Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993 05-10 EDAP Regular Session EDA AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MAY 10, 1993 (following adjournment of City Council meeting) 7 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: * a. EDA Minutes - April 26, 1993 - Special Session 4. Resolutions: a. Authorizing the Acquisition of Certain Real Property Within the City of Brooklyn Center and Establishing Offer of Just Compensation for Said Property Located at 5305 Bryant Avenue North in Brooklyn Center b. Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Demolition of 6715, 6717, 6719, and 6721 Humboldt Avenue North in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 5. Adjournment CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Camcil Mewing Date May 10 ,1993 Agenda Item Number 01 1� , REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ******************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: EDA MINUTES - APRIL 26, 1993 - SPECIAL SESSION DEPT. APPROVAL: Brad Hoffman, EJUA Coordinator MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOMNIENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below/attaclfed SU B ARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL SESSION APRIL 26, 1993 CITY IiALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority met in regular session and was called to order by President 'Todd Paulson at 8:55 p.m. ROLL CALL President Todd Paulson, Commissioners Celia Scott, Dave Rosene, Barb Kalligher, and Kristen Mann. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Community Development Brad Hoffman, Community Development Specialist Tom Bublitz, City Attorney Charlie UFevere, and Council Secretary Nancy Berg. APPROVAL OF MINUTES APRIL 12. 1993 - SPECIAL SESSION There was a motion by Commissioner Mann and seconded by Commissioner Kalligher to approve the minutes of the April 12, 1993, EDA meeting as printed. The motion passed unanimously, DISCUSSION ITEMS CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACTING WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY SERVICES FOR HOME REHABILITATION DEELERED LOAN PROGRAM The City Manager presented the consideration of contracting with Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development for Administrative Services for Home Rehabilitation Deferred Loan Program. He explained the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment Authority presently had a contract with the Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority (Metro HRA) to perform certain administrative services for the EDA's home rehabilitation deferred loan program. The Community Development Specialist explained Metro HRA staff currently provides administrative services for the applicant verification process including income, asset, mortgage status, and title verification, along with filing of the repayment agreement with 4/26/93 - 1 - t Hennepin County. He explained the cost for this service was $600 per grant project. He further explained staff had been exploring options to improve the efficiency of the administration of the rehabilitation grant prograill. He recommended the Br«uklyll Cccitcr 0 EDA consider contracting with the Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development for administrative services for the rehabilitation grant program for the following reasons; 1. Hennepin County, as lead agency in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development 1310ck Grant Program, establishes procedural guidelines for the program which must be followed in administration of the program. Over the course of each year there are scvc"al deforrod luaii prujcuts which require input from the Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development concerning interpretation of the, eligibility guidelines. Presently, both EDA staff and Metro HRA staff consult with Hennepin County staff on a regular basis regarding interpretation of eligibility guidelines. By having Hennepin County staff assume this administrative function, this three -way discussion would no longer have to occur. 2. Brooklyn Center was the only City that Metro HRA served in this administrative capacity. As a result, Metro HRA assigns the administrative work for the grant program to staff persons whose primary job assignments are comprised of duties other than the admini of tho Brooklyn Center grant program. Access to the Metro HRA staff person was limited, and past performance had been inconsistent. 3. Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development staff work full -time on administration of the home rehabilitation grant program for Hennepin County and for numerous cities in Hennepin County. Hennepin County staff had also been refining the application verification process and work with the process on a full -time basis. 4. By having the Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development perform these administrative services now performed by Metro HRA, the EDA would be better able to coordinate the leverag of additional rant fund b $ g rant availa e hr t ou h the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. With h g t se a dditional e a nal funds qualified applicants can obtain an additional $9,000 for their rehabilitation work on their home. This $9,000 was in addition to the $10,000 offered through the City's CDBG program, The Community Development Specialist continued to explain the City could improve the efficient of the program b using Y p g y t stn He nnepin �'�otm and n ot increase the cost to the FDA g . p County for pro r on of these administrative services. He further explained he had d met with Ms. Kathy Kline at Metro HRA to discuss the possible change to the Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development and she had no objections. He stated the contract with Metro HRA provided for a thirty -day notice of termination. He agreed to work with Hennepin County staff to prepare a contract for EDA consideration if the EDA agreed. 4/26/93 -2- h. Commissioner Scott stated she understood where efficiency for the program would be improved by cutting the middle man, and she agreed with the proposed change. The Community Development Specialist stated he could not say the change would save money, only that it should not cost any more, Commissioner Mann asked if Hennepin County would be as consistent as the Metropolitan Council. She explained the Metropolitan Council had not changed its rate since 1958. The Community Development Specialist answered Hennepin County had indicated to him they can do it for less, but he could not guarantee the price will not go up. He further stated he could address this at contract negotiation time. There was a motion by Commissioner Mann and seconded by Commissioner Scott to proceed with establishing a contract with Hennepin County for the provision of administrative services for the EDA home rehabilitation clePerrcd loan program. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTIONS The City Manager presented a resolution providing for a public hearing regarding the sale of land by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center and authorizing the Executive Director to negotiate a purchase agreement for the sale of such land. He explained Habitat for Humanity had expressed an interest in purchasing the lot at 6730 Perry Avenue North for single- family redevelopment. He, further explained the purchase price for the lot would be in accordance with Habitat for Humanity policy, which is to purchase lots at the price of $1.00. RESOLUTION NO 93 -13 Comniissione,r Scott introdAiwd the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE SALE OF LAND BY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO NEGOTIATE A PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR THE SALE OF SUCH LAND The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner Rosene, and the motion passed unanimously. The Director of Community Development presented a resolution amending the 1993 Capital Outlay Budget for The Earle Drown Heritage Center. He explained the resolution would provide for the purchase of twenty tables and a stage ramp and would eliminate the purchase of chairs. 4/26/93 . 3 - Commissioner Rosene stated the chairs had been put in the budget because the Director of Community Development had felt there was a need for additional chairs. He asked how the Director of Community Development would compensate for the lack of the chairs, The Director of Community Development answered the chairs would be rented. He agreed it would be better to own them and hoped to put it in the budget for next year at a much better cost. Commissioner Scott asked why the ramp was so expensive. Judith Bergeland answered it was made by the same company that made the stage, and it basically comes down to the company being a sole- provider for the ramp. Commissioner Rosene noted there was also an additional amount for table glass -tops. Judith Bergeland answered she needed just slightly more than budget to cover the cost of the glass. RESOLUTION NO. 93 -14 Commissioner Scott intrpduced the fallowing resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1993 CAPITAL OUTLAY BUDGET FOR THE EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner Mann, and the motion passed unanimously. Judith Ber eland informed the EDA the Brown In g e Earle B ow n had been honored with an award. She explained the "Inn Business Review" nominates ten inns across the United $rates as Outstanding Inn of the year. She continued the Earle Brown Inn was nominated in 1992, and the closest state nominated to Minnesota was Michigan. She stated staff would be preparing a press release about the award. She further explained the people who gave the award came to the Inn incognito once in 1991 and once in 1992. She continued to explain the historic significance and link in the middle of the city were all part of what brought this honor to the Inn. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Kalligher and seconded by Commissioner Rosene to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Todd Paulson, president Recorded and transcribed by: Nancy Borg TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial 4/26/93 - 4 - CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date May 10, 1993 Agenda Item Number / a � REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND ESTABLISHING OFFER OF JUST COMPENSATION FOR SAID PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5305 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH IN BROOKLYN CENTER DEPT. APPROVAL: Tom Bublitz, Community D opment Specialist MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECONMENDATION: _;L" No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUNMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached YES ) The EDA is requested to approve a resolution which would authorize the making of an offer of just compensation to acquire the property at 5305 Bryant Avenue North in Brooklyn Center. The acquisition of the property was reviewed as a discussion item by the EDA at its March 22, 1993 meeting, and the EDA approved a motion to authorize staff to prepare a formal appraisal on the property based on the initial inspection by the City's Building Official regarding the condition of the property. The EDA board has received a copy of the appraisal report on the single - family property located at 5305 Bryant Avenue North. Additionally, the City Assessor has calculated the fair market rents for the property and has determined that the property is exempt from the one for one housing replacement rule (Barney Frank) which requires that any affordable units demolished must be replaced on a one for one basis within a three year period from the demolition. Staff was initially contacted by the owner of the property in February of this year with a written request to consider acquisition of the property. An inspection of the property by the City Building Official and myself resulted in a staff recommendation to consider the property for acquisition under the City's scattered site redevelopment program. A copy of the owner's letter requesting the EDA to acquire her property is included with this council request form. The acquisition is being approached as a voluntary sale by the owner; and, as such, she would be required to formally waive any consideration of relocation benefits. Funding for the project is recommended to be from the City's CDBG program for scattered site redevelopment. The initial appraisal recommended a value of $42,000 for the property. At the time of the writing of this request form, the City Assessor had not completed the review appraisal and reconciled it with the initial appraisal. However, he did indicate the review appraisal would be very close to the initial appraisal. As a result, I have kept the item on Monday's agenda and will have the final appraisal amount for Monday's meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff will recommend a final appraisal amount at Monday's meeting. Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND ESTABLISHING OFFER OF JUST COMPENSATION FOR SAID PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5305 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH IN BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority has received the following items relative to the appraisal of the real property located at 5305 Bryant Avenue North: a. Appraisal report dated April 4, 1993; and b. Review appraisal dated May , 1993. WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center (EDA) is authorized, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.012, Subd. 7, within its area of operation, and without the adoption of an urban renewal plan, to acquire real property and to demolish or remove the buildings and improvements thereon; and is WHEREAS, the owner of the property located at 5305 Bryant Avenue North in the City of Brooklyn Center, legally described as the south 1/2 of the east 1/2 of that part lying east of east line of Colfax Avenue and the east 14 feet of the south 1/2 of the west 1/2 of that part lying east of the east line of Colfax Avenue, Lot 9, Block 4, Bellevue Acres (the property), has requested that the EDA consider the purchase of the property; and WHEREAS, the building located on the property is substandard and obsolescent and that such condition and obsolescence is detrimental to the public heath, safety and welfare of the community; and WHEREAS, the EDA has received an appraisal and a review appraisal which establishes that the market value for the property is $ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center as follows: 1. The EDA hereby finds and determines that the property is substandard and obsolete within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes Section 469.012. 2. The appraisal documents described in paragraph 1 of this resolution are hereby accepted and the fair market value of $ , established by EDA Resolution No. the appraisal documents, is hereby accepted and established as just compensation for the real property located at 5305 Bryant Avenue North. 3. The Executive Director is authorized to make a written offer of $ to the owner of the real property at 5305 Bryant Avenue North for the acquisition of the property, contingent on release of the property from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Environmental Conditions and the publication and subsequent approval by HUD of a Notice of Finding of No Significant Impact on the Environment (FONSI) and Notice of Intent to Request Release of Funds and to take such further action as may be necessary to acquire the property. Date. Todd Paulson, President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. February 25, 1993 Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center Attention: Brad Hoffman, Coordinator 6301 Single Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Re: Scattered -Site Redevelopment Program Dear Mr. Hoffman: In recent years the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center (the "Authority ") has undertaken a scattered -site redevelopment program (the "Program ") within the City which entails the purchase and demolition of blighted residential properties in order to replace such properties with new housing. I am the owner /occupant of a single- family residence located at 5305 Bryant Avenue North within the City. The house, consisting of approximately 630 square feet, was constructed in the early 1920's. In my opinion, the house is blighted because in order to renovate the house to an acceptable level of repair and code compliance, the costs would greatly exceed the value of the house upon completion of the renovations. It appears that the following renovations are needed with respect to the house, including estimated costs: 1. Siding: The siding is deteriorating in areas and the overhang on the front porch is rotting. I assume the front of the house was at one time an open porch because that is the only area under which there is no basement. When the porch was enclosed and became a part of the living room, no type of wallboard was used to back the siding. There has been a problem with wasps nesting in this area, gaining access through the cracks between the siding material. While the garage obviously needs paint, I have not included in the estimate a cost to side the garage, assuming paint would be sufficient. I assume the cost for exterior repairs and installation of siding would cost approximately $7,500.00. 2. Roof: Just by visual inspection, it appears that shingles are beginning to curl and in the near future a new roof will need to be installed, even though at the current time there is no visible sign of leakage. Since there are currently several layers of shingles, these need to be completely torn off. I assume the cost to replace the roof would be approximately $3,500.00. 3. Windows: Except for the kitchen and back hall, it appears that the house contains all the original windows. These are mainly double hung with sash cording. Both windows in the bedroom to the back of the house need replacement. In the double hung window, the sill is rotted out and there is major leakage. In the horizontal window there are doors which open into the room on a hinge. When there are north or northwesterly winds, these windows tend to blow open, even though I have installed a combination storm /screen window. In the front bedroom the horizontal window is more of a metal casement style. I have also installed a combination storm /screen window in it. There is obvious leakage because during the coldest part of the winter, this window frosts up. In the front of the living room there are two side -by- side windows which need replacement. The kitchen window is the newest window in the house and needs to be replaced because of its low quality. The window is not square and there are airspaces between the sections. Two basement windows also need to be replaced. At an average cost of $500.00 per window, including labor, I estimate that the cost to replace 6 windows would be $3,400.00 (assuming the cost of the 2 basement windows of $200.00 each). 4. Foundation: There have been leakages in the foundation on three sides of the basement which appear to be dependent on either the amount of snow melt or rainfall. The south wall is bowed in and appears to leak the most, even though there is a gutter along that side of the house. There are areas in the exterior foundation that need new mortar. In order to correct the bow in the south wall and to repair the leakage problem, I assume the exterior would need to be excavated. I am not sure the type of block which is now in the foundation, and that may have an impact on the repair costs. Additionally, if there were to be excavation required on the north wall, this activity would encroach upon the neighbor's property, including an asphalt driveway, and those repair costs would need to be taken into consideration, if the neighbor approved the activity. The house itself encroaches on the neighbor's property. I assume foundation corrections would cost $12,000. 5. Plumbing: As in many older homes, the plumbing system is antiquated and has been updated only when repairs have been required. When I moved in none of the plumbing fixtures had independent shut -offs. As plumbing repairs have been done, some shut -offs have been installed. There is a leakage problem in the bathtub. Whenever water is run in the bathtub, water drips into the basement. I have had people look at the pipes but was unable to find the source of the leakage. There is also a leakage problem under the kitchen sink, which has a drain system which should be replaced. I assume to correct the plumbing situation, the costs would be approximately $3,000.00. 6. Electrical: Similar to the plumbing, the electrical system is a combination of ages. Very few of the outlets are grounded. When I moved in I assumed the wiring had been updated because the wiring in the basement to the circuit box looked new. As I have lived there I have found that certain circuits are overloaded, i.e., portion of the living room, bedroom, basement and portion of the kitchen on one circuit. It is not uncommon in certain outlets in the kitchen that when the toaster is used, the outlet, toaster plug and cord become extremely hot. I am now wondering if that is caused by the wiring involved. I was concerned a month ago when I was installing an overhead fan in one bedroom and found that the wiring was very old (30's or 40's) and there was no junction box in the ceiling. It made me wonder the state of the wiring in the rest of the house. I assume to correct the electrical shortfalls in the house would cost approximately $3,000. 7. Additionally, at sometime there was a fire in the basement in the back of the house. I am not sure when this occurred. While appropriate repairs were made and joists were replaced, I am concerned about the overall structure of the back of the house since there seems to be a "give" in the kitchen floor. As the house ages further, this may become more of an issue. I am including an estimate of $1,500 to repair this problem so it does not progress further. Based on these estimates, which I want to point out are very rough and are not based on any quotes from contractors, costs to restore the house would be as follows: Siding $ 7,500 Roof 3,500 Windows 3,400 Foundation 12,000 Plumbing 3,000 Electrical 3,000 Reinforce Floor 1.500 Total $33,900 I want to oint out that these estimates do not contain an cosmetic updates to the house. p Y p Based on the age and square footage of the house, the house has an estimated market value of approximately $53,000. I currently owe approximately $48,500 on the house. If I were to undertake the repairs, the house would not be worth $82,400. Based upon my discussion with a realtor, the estimated value of the house upon completion of the above activities would be $59,000. This is also based on the age of the house, the size of the house, the fact that the bedrooms are very small (9x9 and 9x8 - the realtor had concerns as to whether the smaller one could be considered a "legal" bedroom) and that the house is nonconforming with the other houses in the neighborhood based upon its location far back on the lot. I would like to propose that the Authority include my property in the Program. At the present time the property generates $713 in taxes (payable 1993). A new house would generate property taxes of approximately $1,185 for the same period, a 66% increase in tax base assuming a value of $80,000. This would benefit the City because more taxes would be generated and it would assist in increasing value of the surrounding properties. Additionally, there is a possibility that the taxes generated from the present site would continue to decline because of the blight while the taxes of the new house would increase. At the present time I am very desirous of selling this property. I have consulted with a realtor and he has suggested that my most viable option is to find an investor who would turn the property into rental housing. This would further contribute to a decline in this area of the City. This statement is based on the current housing market and is no way meant to be interpreted in a coercive mode. I feel this is one of the more convenient areas of the City. There is close access to shopping, transportation and freeway access. For the last few years I have thought that a viable option the Authority could look at in developing the neighborhood would be to acquire my property, the commercial property on the corner of 53rd and Bryant and the property on 53rd abutting the commercial property. This would be a good location for a small, 8 unit senior housing facility. If a four -way stop were installed at the intersection, it would be even better. Bryant is right on a bus line and one block south on Bryant is a small convenience store and beauty shop. There would also be room for some garages and gardening space. I have lived in my house for a number of years and have many nice memories, but realistically, the City would be better off with a new house on that property rather than having mine located there. I purchased this house about 8 years ago for $49,900. The housing market was much different then and as to whether I made a wise purchase or not need not be addressed. I was more interested in acquiring affordable housing for my family. As stated previously I owe approximately $48,500 on my house and the market value is currently $52,900. Based upon these figures, I would propose that the Authority purchase my house for $50,700, which is the average of the two prices. Additionally, I would waive any relocation costs with respect to the Authority's acquisition. Time is of the essence with respect to this proposal. I have made an offer on a different house outside of the City. While I generally qualify for the second house without selling the house on Bryant, I would need to rent out the house on Bryant, which I am hesitant to become involved with. If I can provide you with any additional information with respect to the house or this proposal, please let me know. I will be available at reasonable times for the City to have acess to the house for any inspection. I can be reached during the day at 375 -6259 and in the evening at 561 -1468. Thank you for your consideration with respect to this proposal. Very t 1 yours, Pamela Frantum cc: Nick Eoloff Tom Bublitz 5305 Bryant Avenue North Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date May 10, 1993 Agenda Item Numbe REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION OF 6715, 6717, 6719, AND 6721 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH DEPT. APPROVAL: �� Tom Bublitz, Community Development Specialist MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECONMMNDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) Bids were opened for the demolition of the fourplex apartment buildings located at 6715, 6717, 6719, and 6721 Humboldt Avenue North on May 4, 1993. A summary of the bid amounts is contained in the resolution included with this request form. The apparent low bidder for the demolition project is Kevitt Excavating, Inc., with a bid of $20,900. The staff assessment of the bids is that this is an extremely low bid for a project of this size. However, references were obtained from previous customers of the low bidder and the references indicated the company did acceptable demolition work. Agencies contacted regarding the contractor's work were the Minneapolis Community Development Agency (MCDA) and the City of Robbinsdale. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the resolution. Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION OF 6715, 6717, 6719, AND 6721 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH IN BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for site demolition at 6715, 6717, 6719, and 6721 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, the following bids were received, opened and tabulated by a representative of the Community Development Director on the 4th day of May, 1993: BIDDER BID AMOUNT Herbst and Sons Construction $75,200 Bolander and Sons 44,800 Roger Kjelberg 39,900 Doty & Sons, Inc. 38,600 Veit & Company, Inc. 33,619 Kevitt Excavating, Inc. 20 WHEREAS, it appears that Kevitt Excavating, Inc., has submitted the lowest responsible bid for site demolition at 6715, 6717, 6719, and 6721 Humboldt Avenue North. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. The EDA Executive Director is hereby authorized to execute a contract with Kevitt Excavating, Inc., for site demolition at 6715, 6717, 6719, and 6721 Humboldt Avenue North in the amount of $20,900. 2. All costs associated with the project shall be accounted for in the EDA special operating fund. Date Todd Paulson, President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.