Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993 05-03 CCP Joint Work Session with Financial Commission F I I r CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MAY 3, 1993 7:00 p.m. COUNCIL WORK SESSION JOINT MEETING WITH FINANCIAL COMMISSION H ,L OUN CR CHAM ER 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Inner -Ring Suburban Community Funding Needs 4. Organizational Evaluation Process 5. Capital Improvement Program Process for 1993 6. 1994 Budget Calendar /Financial Commission Involvement Last year the Financial Commission expressed dissatisfaction with the way they presented their recommendations and they wish to discuss alternative approaches. 7. Adjournment t DRAFT 3/5/93 BROOKLYN CENTER INNER -RING SUBURBAN COMMUNITY FUNDING NEEDS Inner -ring suburbs in this metropolitan area in the decade of the '80s and now on into the '90s are beset by major urban problems such as: drug and crime activity increases; deteriorating housing (both single - family and apartment); aging municipal infrastructure; and aging commercial and industrial areas with declining property values. In Minnesota, most of these cities are classified as cities of the second class and do not have available to them the programs, laws, and funding sources which are available to Minnesota cities of the first class (Duluth, St. Paul, and Minneapolis). These communities are entering into the decade of the 90s without the legal tools and funding mechanisms to address the major problems g g J P they face. Brooklyn Center, specifically, has a significant apartment problem. The tax law changes of 1986 affected their economic viability, most units are 30 years or older, and reduced numbers of renters has produced a surplus of rental apartment units in Brooklyn Center and other inner -ring suburbs. Our long -range goal should be to reduce the number of rental apartments in the next ten to fifteen years by ten to fifteen percent (approximately the same perecentage as our apartment vacancy rate over the last three years). Brooklyn Center seeks funding sources which could assist in implementation of the following approaches to achieve these rental apartment reduction goals: 1) by purchasing and razing those apartment units which are not economically feasible to rehabilitate; 2) rehabilitation of some units to such uses as senior and /or handicap housing; and 3) conversion of some units to co -op or condo status. Currently, Brooklyn Center needs an annual consistent source of funding to accomplish this goal. o address the need for commercial industrial redevelopment, Brooklyn Center will need a mechanism for assisting redevelopment in such a fashion as to make redevelopment property competitive with open land in the outer -ring suburbs. This can be accomplished by modifying the existing Tax Increment Financing legislation or some other mechanism which will allow redevelopment to be competitive with open land development. We need these modifications to address such rehabilitation needs as: deteriorated neighborhood shopping centers (Northbrook, pp g Humboldt Square), Brookl Boulevard yn rd Redevelopment, and storm water treatment facilities in the Brookdale area. Brooklyn Center has completed a market housing analysis and inventory and requires additional funding source for our program to replace dilapidated single - family housing at • a rate of eight to ten homes per year. Brooklyn Center needs a source of revenue annually in the amount of approximately $400, 000 to $500,000 per year to achieve this goal. This would allow Brooklyn Center to realistically address the deterioration of housing in its neighborhoods. Brooklyn Center needs sources of revenue to supplement special assessments, utility revenues, and bonding sources to develop an ongoing utility, street, and neighborhood revitalization program. Brooklyn Center's utilities and streets are entering into the stage where major reconstruction is required. The only source of funding available at this time is through assessments, property taxes, and utilities. Residents in some areas of the city have already paid street and utility assessments previously. Because there are a number of 2 low - income families in various neighborhoods in Brooklyn Center, there is a need for an additional funding source to finance our assessment stabilization program at a rate of approximately $200,000 per year. We are considering commencement of a twenty year utility and street improvement program which would involve the replacement of approximately four miles of utilities and streets annually. Because much of the cost burden falls on assessments and property tax, additional sources of revenue such as a transportation utility and local option sales tax funds should be considered as a potential alternate revenue source. In addition to the above needs, the operating departments of Brooklyn Center have suggested needs in the following areas: additional police officers and personnel to address the crime and drugs issue; enhancement of Brooklyn Center's image by funding community promotional and image enhancement programs; additional public works personnel in the management information service area to develop computer capability in this department; additional personnel to assist volunteers in general and specifically neighborhood advisory committee coordination; intrasuburban transit such as a circulator /dial -a -ride system for the Brooklyn Center area; and additional fire inspection services and by creating the position of fire marshal. Brooklyn has recently completed a total capital improvement program and it has identified, or in the process of identifying, needs in the following areas: public safety (police) building addition, a senior center (community center addition), various ADA 3 improvements to Brooklyn Center community facilities, public works garage addition and remodeling, remodeling and expansion of both Brooklyn Center fire stations, park building rehabilitation program, park playground equipment replacement program, recreation facility improvements in the Twin Lake area (possible additional land acquisition); and other recreational facility needs. 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Paulson and City Councilmemb s FROM: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager DATE: March 31, 1993 SUBJECT: ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION PROCESS Your Financial Commission has been charged with the responsibility of evaluating the organization of the City of Brooklyn Center as to its effectiveness and report back to the City Council. The Council at a previous work session had discussed various approaches and questions they wish to be included in this process. I have developed the following outline of a process we believe will address the City Council's interests. This process would cover three areas: 1) evaluation of the potential for administrative structure reorganization; 2) evaluation of the supervisory/management and other staffing levels (using comparative data currently available); 3) a Service Evaluation Process. AREAL ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE REORGANIZATION The Financial Commission would evaluate the potential for developing a future organization plan which could be implemented over time to serve the changing needs of Brooklyn Center. I have attached for your information a copy of the organizational chart of Brooklyn Center just prior to the reorganization of the Community Development Department in the 1992 budget; a rough draft of an administrative organization which divides our organization into functions, departments, and divisions (this chart identifies most all functions of the City); a slightly modified organizational chart of the City of Brooklyn Center recognizing recent changes and doing some minor modifications to the existing structure; and a copy of the City of Bloomington organizational structure. The purpose of this evaluation would be to give a guideline to future councils and staff as to what the organization should or could eventually be and once it is decided, then as opportunities occur, you could make changes and implement portions of the restructuring. AREA 2. SUPER VISORKAIANAGEMENTAND STAFFING LEVELS REVIEW The second stage of this process would be to evaluate and compare staffing levels in all portions of the organization: in the supervisory/management area, and in total personnel. We propose to use existing, readily available information from the Stanton Survey and other sources to iv e the Financial Commission and the Council an initial g evaluation of comparable staffing levels in similar metro area communities. If this data demonstrates a need for further, more detailed analysis, then the recommendations could be made, Is appropriations approved, and a more detailed analysis could be completed. PP � Y P Memo to Council Page 2 March 31, 1993 AREA 3. SERVICE EVALUATION PROCESS After your discussion at your last work session, the Council appeared to be leaning toward processes which involve employees within the organization rather than outside time analysis experts. We concur in this focus and propose a Service Evaluation Process structured similar to the 1992 prioritization process. The Service Evaluation Process would have a similar employee involvement committee system and would be directed at answering the following questions: 1. What do we do well and why? 2. What do we do okay and why? 3. What needs improvement? How /why? 4. Are there other cities or businesses which do particular tasks better than we do? How /why? 5. How can we provide services better? 6. Are we doing the right things? 7. How should your department's performance be measured? 8. What opportunities are there for additional cooperation between departments? 9. In what ways can we encourage cooperation with other cities and governmental units? 10. What other departments do we interact with and in what ways? //, 0 1,0 e.S -i4lovS I If the City Council and Financial Commission can agree to this general outline, I believe it is something which could give us a guide to use in future budget decisions and in general overall policy discussions. Attachment '" ACte�nTin► PE�CSOMNE IL v t-tASult 61 AC Pu�c r1 A / /�tA►LAL siard a ADM T►1,Ty 6,LL►N� N Si�J6� — S /EeiaL a �R ,AN1Z �r10 ►sk L.ct�►Sta + �S�tssir►E�T MA*VAQ%twttNT t/t��. ►TS r �to�t, `' saii:fTWs s o r C �Ty o F Ql�oOklyn! CE N TE.( MINNESOTA A s� grE c n e,� o ; DAA �T a s ,�ovNQs R �Ua {'a VI J`L Y r s Tv6� t A ti D iT l.E� A L Aoni�N �� ir )C's v E3 ?4AT, o � � C "' ` 0 N �rCp 1 Ao U 6th v = TLL �,CoE„A REc�(EA ctrY ,T rlo4�cA�,s ni MaNA66l� Co�tNC� 1, ELecTof%ATF. Cc �� vN �Ty � aratme "i ,�6�AE 7 A P �o�tt'c1 .A� Vr'� Cofin►►tSto�JS f ti {t CIO �CeNaG�- G y�'s �iy8n DlV 1510 5 C3� C� v t r °'"� AG v s Ig �� ��� t p �� R T M LNTS the to R h� v a F oQ- ul A� tir -1e '� —A;susCR pl"" c� '�Fs - R'Rsyon►sc F U N CT o N S P ` o ,N Cl 1')r ©t l� R � `Y N le vv I ELECTORATE CITY COUNCIL AdviSOry Commissions Purchasing City Attorney - -- City Manager Personnel City Clerk Elections Licenses Public Fire Community Financial Police Recreation services Department Development Services Department Department COV't BIdgS Sanitary Sewer Inspections Acctng Recreation & Audit Programs Storm Sewer Engineering Assesslng utntty ommunity Willing Center �V ater Dept Street Mntc EDA/HRA Equipment Park Mntce Zoning Liquor Golf Services Stores Course EBHC Risk Mgmnt MIS People of Bloomington Housing and Redevelopment Authority May or and Cit Charter Commission :;;:: y y Council Port Authority ........ ................ Natural and Historic Resources Commission Planning Commission CAN Advisory Commission Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission Traffic and Transportation Advisory Commission Human Rights Commission Senior Citizen Advisory Commission Health Advisory and y o City Manager Merit Board >' Legal Personnel ......: ...:................... Administrative Community Community Police olio Public tY e Fire Works ork s i Services ces e elo m n e .. t S ry ... a ices .. ............................... ox City Clerk Operations Planning .. Health Engineering y` Finance M , Support Division Building and Parks and Traffic Inspection Recreation Audit Fire Prevention Human Maintenance Services Information Housing and Systems Redevelopment CATY Equipment Assessing Environmental Recreation Utilities Services Facilities Su rt Services CD Block Grant PPo Port Authority Management 3300 A 4/02 ORGANIZATION CHART COUNCIL - MANAGER PLAN City of Brooklyn Ce nter, Minnesota ADVISORY. CHARTER COMMISSION Various Ad Hoc Committees ELECTORATE / (appointed by district court) ADVISORY CITY ATTORNEY Housing Commission ADVISORY CITY COUNCIL Human Rights 8 Resources Commission PERSONNEL COORDINATOR ADVISORY EDA COORDINATOR Parks & Recreation Commission -- ---- -- �--- -� CITY MANAGER / ADVISORY CITY CLERK DIRECTOR EARLE Planning Commission Emergency BROWN Prepared- HERITAGE ness CENTER DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR CHIEF DIRECTOR CHIEF MANAGER DIRECTOR ASSESSOR Planning of Finance of Volunteer Public Tax and Recreation Department Police En v i Liquor Assessment Inspection Cit Department mental De artment Stores De a�tment Department Treas�irer Health p p Department Golf D �— DDivision Course Park Government Engineering Street Maintenance Buildings Centerbrook Division Division Division Division MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, Administrative Assistant /Deputy City Clerk DATE: April 2, 1993 SUBJECT: COMPOSITION OF COMMISSIONS Subdivision 5 of the enabling resolutions for the Brooklyn Center advisory commissions sets the size of membership of the commissions. Following is the current composition for each of the commissions: DRUG AWARENESS Chair plus eight (8) members. FINANCIAL Chair plus six (6) members. HOUSING Chair 8 lus eight members. p g () e bers. HUMAN RIGHTS & RESOURCES Chair plus six (6) members. PARK & RECREATION Chair plus six (6) members. PLANNING Chair plus six (6) members. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF BROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE: 569 -3300 C ENTER FAX: 569 -3494 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 March 22, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Paulson Council Members. FROM: Diane Spector, Public Works Coordinato a" SUBJ: Capital Improvement Program Process for 1993 Enclosed are two items. The first is a revised version of the Capital Improvement Process (CIP) for 1993, reflecting your suggestions from March 15's work session. Specifically, I have added step 3, where staff recommendations are to be reviewed by the Council in May, prior to going to the Commissions for review and input. You may at that time provide direction, if you wish, to the Commissions - perhaps suggesting a theme or a focus. The second enclosure is an excerpt from the CIP of projects listed for consideration in 1993, 1994, and 1995, with a summary for 1996 -2000. A more detailed version of this enclosure is reproduced in the 1993 budget book; it is the final section, on green paper. If you have any suggestions regarding the CIP process, please let me know as soon as possible, and I will incorporate them into the process. I anticipate that staff review of capital needs will begin by the end of March. Please feel free to discuss any aspect of the CIP - the process, the summary tables, the individual projects - with me at any time. I'd especially like to know if there are additional summaries or displays which you think would be helpful, or if there are other category breakdowns you'd like to see. Thank you for your time. cc: G. G. Splinter Sy Knapp isseui.,w�c�rnr� e Revised CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS: 1993 Because many CIP initiatives are funded by the General Fund Budget, this process must coincide with the budget process 1. Staff reviews needs and funding availability during March/April Engineering, Public Utilities, Streets: Water, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Streets Engineering, Building Maintenance, Fire: Government Buildings Park Maintenance, Recreation: Parks Streets, Parks, PU, Police, Fire: Vehicles Data Processing Committee: Data Processing Heritage Center: ? ADA Compliance: ADA Compliance Committee 2. Staff recommendations are reviewed and prioritized at a Department Head meeting around the third week of April. Additions or changes are suggested for staff review and cost analysis 3. Staff recommendations are forwarded to the City Council at the first meeting in May as a discussion item. PURPOSE: Review staff recommendations, make suggestions, and establish a direction for Commission and staff 4. Informational meeting of Commissions in May (Park & Rec, Financial, Water Mgmt, other ?) with staff where this is the only item on the agenda PURPOSE: To review (1) history and background; (2) where staff sees needs and priorities; (3) what are existing sources of funding; and (4) what are possible other sources of funding 5. Commission working session(s) PURPOSE: (1) Review staff recommendations; (2) Discuss process to evaluate any new needs - e.g., rely solely on Commission's expertise, have neighborhood or general meeting, send surveys or questionnaires; (3) Implement process; (4) Staff to provide support in estimating costs etc. 5 Prioritize needs and assign target dates PP , ( ) i g g g , 6 Evaluate luate all in light of fundin g constraints; () 7 Make final recommendations , 6. Commissions make preliminary recommendations in June /July for inclusion in departmental budget requests 7. Staff compiles Commission recommendations into draft CIP report by end of July 8. Council work session in August PURPOSE: (1) Review Commission's processes; (2) Review recommendations and priorities; (3) Review funding plan; (4) Discussion; (5) Suggest modifications 9. Staff provides additional information, cost estimates, etc. 10. Public hearing or meeting to comment on proposed plan 11. Council approves CIP in September eAeng \cip \process 0 0 0 - AS PROPOSED TABLE A — Capital Improvement Program — Detail of Capital Outlays Water Utility Capital Improvements Italics indicates moved to 1993 12— Mar -93 1993 1994.. 1'995 1996 -207 FUND SQURCE EXPENDITURES: All Water Utili WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Well 10 to Well 6 0 Shingle Creek Pkwy to Brooklyn Blvd (69th Ave Project) 0 Well 6 to Shingle Creek Pkwy 300,000 0 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Construct Well #10 2 MG Reservoir & Pumping Station 3,300,000 0 Construct Well #11 1,000,000 MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS New Electric Controls at Wells 5, 6, 7 90,000 0 Loop 2" Water Main at Lawrence Circle 15,000 0 WATER TOWERS Paint Tower #1 166,000 Paint Tower #2 150,000 0 Paint Tower #3 158,000 MISCELLANEOUS Water Sample Lab Update 25,000 Routine Well Maintenance 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Cathodic Protection 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 SCADA System Update 50,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,715,66 $165 000 $225,0001 $1,749 FUND SOURCES: Water Utility 3,715,000 165,000 225,000 1,749,000 TOTAL $3 $165,0001 $225,0001 $1,749,0001 0 s +D AS PROPOSED TABLE B — Capital Improvement Program — Detail of Capital Outlays Sanitary Sewer Utility Capital Improvements Italics indicates moved to 1993 12— Mar -93 < 1:95 . 11994 1!;995 1996b;QU FllND.SO.URCE EXPENDITURES: All San Sewer Utility LIFT STATIONS 0 Replace Lift Station #2 0 Lift #1 Rehab, Replace Forcemain 600,000 0 Intrac /Motorola Update 90,000 0 Replace Lifts 8 & 9 220,000 SEWER REPLACEMENT: 69th Avenue, Brooklyn Blvd to Drew 0 53rd Avenue (By Brookdale 10 Apts) 32,000 0 James Avenue (55th to the South) 70,000 0 69th Avenue to Lift Station #1 250,000 750,000 0 194/694 Repair 0 Replace Sewer Line at Brookdale MISCELLANEOUS Annual Televising Program 8,000 8,000 8,000 40,000 1/1 Remediation Program 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Mobile Emergency Pump 30,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $968 , 0001 $130,0001 $778 , 0001 $360 FUND SOURCES: Sanitary Sewer Utility 968,000 130,000 778,000 360,000 TOTAL [ : " : � sq68 , 000j si3o , 0001 $778 $360 AS PROPOSED TABLE C — Capital Improvement Program — Detail of Capital Outlays Storm Drainage Utility Capital Improvements Italics indicates moved to 1993 12— Mar -93 1993 199;4 1`:995 >> .1996 2000 FUNa S URCE All Storm Drainage EXPENDITURES: Utility Repair or Replace Defective Sections of System 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 Watershed Commission Capital Improvements 100,000 Miscellaneous improvements 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 Water Quality Improvement Projects 50,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $175,0001 $225,0001 $225,0001 $1 FUND SOURCES: Storm Drainage Utility 175,000 225,000 225,000 1,225,000 TOTAL $175 000 $22 $225 $1 AS PROPOSED TABLE D — Capital Improvement Program — Detail of Capital Outlays Sidewalk and Trail Improvements Italics indicates moved to 1993 12— Mar -93 , 1953 1994 1995 1996 -20b0 FUND: SOURCE EXPENDITURES: OFF — STREET TRAIL: Trail Subsidence Correction Behind Library 0 Local State Aid Humboldt Square Trail 0 Local State Aid 53rd Avenue, Upton to Shingle Creek 0 Local State Aid Brookdale Center Trail 300,000 0 Local State Aid 69th Avenue, Brooklyn Blvd to Shingle Creek Parkway 0 Local State Aid I Twin Lake /Preserve Trail 94,000 Local State Aid Hennepin Parks' Riverridge Trail 50,000 0 Hennepin County NSP Easement Trail, Knox to Dupont 50,000 0 Local State Aid Willow Lane, 1694 to West River Road 25,000 0 Local State Aid Palmer Lake Dual Trail 71,000 Local State Aid 69th Avenue, Shingle Creek Parkway to TH252 90,000 Local State Aid ON— STREET TRAIL: Marking and Signage 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 Local State Aid SIDEWALK: , Northway Drive 18,000 0 Local State Aid 73rd Avenue, Humboldt to TH 252 35,000 0 Local State Aid 55th Avenue, Lions Park to Logan 21,000 Local State Aid 73rd Avenue, Humboldt to Penn 30,000 0 Local State Aid 71 st/72nd Avenues, Noble to Halifax 27,000 Local State Aid TOTAL EXPENDITURES $118,0001 $110,0001 $310,0001 $353,0001 FUND SOURCES: State Aid — Local Accounts #2611/ #2600 118,000 60,000 310,000 353,000 General Fund Other Governments 0 50,000 0 TOTAL I siis.onol sl to.noo -sa1n nnn visa nnn AS PROPOSED TABLE E — Capital Improvement Program — Detail of Capital Outlays Park Improvements Italics indicates moved to 1993 12— Mar -93: 1593 199# 1;995 :; <: 19962000 ND SOURCE EXPENDITURES: Playground Equipment Replacement: 2 per Year* 63,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 General Fund Replace 6 Shelter Buildings 360,000 GO Park Bonds Lighting— Grandview Baseball 100,000 GO Park Bonds Acquisition of New Park Land 200,000 GO Park Bonds Twin Lake /Preserve /Kylawn Improvements 400,000 GO Park Bonds TOTAL EXPENDITURES $63,0001 $25,0001 $25,0001 $1,185,0001 FUND SOURCES: Capital Projects Fund 0 0 0 0 General Fund 63,000 25,000 25,000 125,000 GO Bonds 0 0 0 1,060,000 I TOTAL $s3 000 1 $25,0001 $25,0001 $1 185 000 * 1993 budget = $63,000. All items pending comprehensive park and playground needs study. 0 0 0 . . , AS PROPOSED TABLE F — Capital Improvement Program — Detail of Capital Outlays Public Building Improvements Italics indicates moved to 1993 12— Mar -93 .... 1993 t 9!4 1995 < .1998 -24t�Q FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURES: ' CITY HALL City Office Improvements 1,500,000 0 1 /2 GO Bonds, 1 /2 Capital COMMUNITY CENTER Projects Fund Senior Center /Elevator 1,000,000 0 1 /2 GO Bonds, 1 /2 Capital Projects Fund Water Slide 0 Capital Projects Fund CITY GARAGE IMPROVEMENTS 250,000 450,000 1 /4 Water, 1 /4 Sewer Utilities, 1 /2 Capital Projects FIRE STATIONS East Station 610,000 0 1 /2 GO Bonds, 1 / 2 Capital West Station 330,000 0 Projects Fund TOTAL EXPENDITURES . $3 , 690 , 0001 $ $o $450 FUND SOURCES: Capital Projects 1,870,000 0 0 225,000 Water Utility 50,000 0 0 112,500 Sanitary Sewer Utility 50,000 0 0 112,500 GO Bonds 1,720,000 0 0 0 TOTAL $3 690 000 $0 $0 $450 000 AS PROPOSED TABLE G — Capital Improvement Program — Detail of Capital Outlays Street Improvements Italics indicates moved to '93/4 12— Mar -93 1'994 1995 1996 -20OQ ] UiND SOURCE EXPENDITURES: SEALCOATING 140,000 140,000 140,000 700,000 General Fund SIGNALS 69th and France Avenues 0 MSA— Regular #2613 Brooklyn Blvd & TH100 Northbound Ramp /Lilac Dr 150,000 0 Local State Aid Brooklyn Blvd & 51 st Avenue 150,000 0 Local State Aid Summit & Earle Brown W (Target Entrance) 125,000 0 Special Assessments Shingle Creek Pkwy and Parkway Circle 125,000 0 Special Assessments REGULAR MSA ACCOUNT #2613 STREET PROJECTS 69th Avenue, Brooklyn Blvd to Shingle Creek Pkwy 0 MSA— Regular #2613 0 MSA — Regular #2613 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 0 MSA— Local #2611/ #2600 MSA— Bonds #2612 0 MSA —Bonds #2612 Water Utility 0 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 0 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 0 Special Assessments 57th Avenue, Logan to Lyndale 1,100,000 0 MSA — Regular #2613 404,000 0 MSA— Regular #2613 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 126,000 0 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 Water Utility 50,000 0 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 4,000 0 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 326,000 0 Storm Drainage Utility Henna in County 190 1 0 1 Hennepin Count AS PROPOSED TABLE G — Capital Improvement Program — Detail of Capital Outlays Street Improvements Italics indicates moved to '93/4 12— Mar -93 1993 ' 1994 11995 1996 -2000 FUND.SUURCE (State Aid Street Projects, con't) 63rd Avenue, W City Limits to Brooklyn Blvd 1,002,000 0 MSA— Regular #2613 461,000 0 MSA— Regular #2613 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 156,000 0 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 Water Utility 95,000 0 0 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 5,000 0 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 135,000 0 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 150,000 0 Special Assessments Noble Avenue, Brooklyn Blvd to N City Limits 87,000 0 MSA — Regular #2613 51,000 0 MSA— Regular #2613 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 (4,000 ) 0 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 Water Utility 13,000 0 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 1,000 0 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 0 0 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 26,000 0 Special Assessments 69th Avenue, Shingle Creek Pkwy to Oliver & Bridge 1,197,000 0 MSA — Regular #2613 1,015,000 0 MSA — Regular #2613 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 (2,000 ) 0 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 Water Utility 32,000 0 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 2,000 0 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 45,000 0 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 105,000 0 Special Assessments France Avenue, 69th to N City Limits 349,000 MSA— Regular #2613 188,000 MSA— Regular #2613 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 18,000 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 Water Utility 31,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 2,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 45,000 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 65 Special Assessments AS PROPOSED TABLE G — Capital Improvement Program — Detail of Capital Outlays Street Improvements Italics indicates moved to '93/4 12— Mar -93 .1993 f 994. 1995; 1996 -200Q FUND SOURCE (State Aid Street Projects, con't) 53rd Avenue, France to 55th Avenue 403,000 MSA— Regular #2613 196,000 MSA— Regular #2613 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 51,000 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 Water Utility 36,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 2,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 51,000 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 67,000 Special Assessments Brooklyn Boulevard At Lilac Drive 571,000 MSA— Regular #2613 474,000 MSA— Regular #2613 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 23,000 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 Water Utility 17,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 1,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 24,000 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 32,000 Special Assessments 51stAvenue, Brooklyn Blvd to Xerxes 71,000 MSA— Regular #2613 40,000 MSA — Regular #2613 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 8,000 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 Water Utility 5,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 1,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 8,000 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 9,000 Special Assessments 69th Avenue, Oliver to Dupont 867,000 MSA— Regular #2613 544,000 MSA — Regular #2613 MSA— Local #2611/ #2600 63,000 MSA —Local #2611/ #2600 Water Utility 45,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 3,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 64,000 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 148,0001 Special Assessments 0 s �► AS PROPOSED TABLE G - Capital Improvement Program - Detail of Capital Outlays Street Improvements Italics indicates moved to '93/4 12- Mar -93 1993 1.99: y 995>? 1996..:.200Q IUND..SURCE (State Aid Street Projects, con't) Humboldt Avenue, 69th to N City Limits 423,000 MSA- Regular #2613 220,000 MSA - Regular #2613 MSA -Local #2611/ #2600 45,000 MSA -Local #2611/ #2600 Water Utility 31,000 Water Utility Sanitary Sewer Utility 2,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Storm Drainage Utility 45,000 Storm Drainage Utility Special Assessments 80,000 Special Assessments OTHER STREET PROJECTS 2/3 Bonds Neighborhood Street Improvement Program 600,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 6,000,000 1/3 Special Assessments LANDSCAPING West River Road Streetscape 0 MSA -Local #2611 Cc Rd 10 Streetscape 100,000 0 1 /2 MSA -2600, 1 /2 Special Assessments Xerxes Avenue Streetscape 70,000 0 MSA -Local #2600 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ! � 537 , 0001 $12 , 068 , 000 FUND SOURCES: MSA - Regular #2613 0 916,000 1,015,000 1,662,000 MSA - Local #2611/ #2600 0 578,000 (2,000 ) 208,000 MSA - Local #2600 120,000 0 0 0 MSA - Bonds #2612 0 0 0 0 Water Utility 0 158,000 32,000 165,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 10,000 2,000 11,000 Storm Drainage Utility 0 461,000 45,000 237,000 Special Assessments 498,000 762,000 501,000 2,381,000 Bonds 402,000 804,000 804,000 4,020,000 General Fund 140,000 140,000 140,000 700,000 Hennepin County 0 01 01 0 TOTAL 1$1,160,000 $3 829 000 2 $9 384 000 * If a Transportation Utilitv is authori7Pd by tha I aniclnt; ira it r`n;;Irl hA i mnH to rei n lann -e of them fe or%An^ - ;.....+ - -._ AS PROPOSED TABLE H — Capital Improvement Program — Detail of Capital Outlays Data Processing Equipment Italics indicates moved to 1993 12— Mar -93 1993 199'4 1995 1996 2QQp FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURES: Network OR Distributed Site 20,000 170,000 General Fund Annual Equipment 65,500 150,000 40,000 100,000 General Fund, Other, Water & Sewer Utilities i Remote Reading Water Meters 275,000 250,000 250,000 Water Utility TOTAL EXPENDITURES $65,5001 $425,0001 $310,0001 $520 FUND SOURCES: General Fund 58,000 108,000 60,000 270,000 Water Utility 7,500 275,000 250,000 250,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility 0 Other Funds 42,000 0 TOTAL r $65 500 $425,000j $310,000j $520 AS PROPOSED TABLE I — Capital Improvement Program — Detail of Capital Outlays City Vehicles Italics indicates moved to 1993 12— Mar -93 T993 i 994. 995 996- 21700 FUND SOURCE (City vehicles, con't) UNLICENSED 1 Ton Roller 0 General Fund Cat Grader 0 General Fund Cat Loader 75,000 General Fund Rubber Tired Roller 0 General Fund Backhoe 50,000 Water Utility Snow Blower 68,000 0 General Fund FIRE DEPARTMENT Vans 375,000 General Fund Pumpers 155,000 General Fund Autos 0 General Fund Ladder 0 General Fund POLICE Autos 56,000 56,000 56,000 280,000 General Fund TOTAL EXPENDITURES $325 $175,0001 $366,6001 $1,506,000 FUND SOURCES: General Fund 220,250 165,000 106,000 1,251,500 Water Utility , 35,000 5,000 0 77,250 Storm Drainage Utility 65,000 0 130,000 150,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility 5,000 5,000 130,000 27,250 TOTAL r "7 $ - 325,2501 $175 000 $366 000 $1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 1994 BUDGET CALENDAR May 10, 1993 Monday City Council discusses elements of Capital Improvements Program (C.I.P.). May 18, 1993 Tuesday Preliminary budget conference for City Manager with city department and division heads, 8:30 a.m., Council Chambers. June 7, 1993 Monday City Council Town Meeting - 1994 Budget. June 14, 1993 Monday Budget requests due from all departments for submission to the Finance Director. June 23, 1993 Wednesday Consolidated budget requests forwarded from the Finance Director to the City Manager. June 24 through July 9 Manager consults as necessary with individual department and division heads as budget document is shaped. June /July 1993 City Commissions make preliminary recommendations on Capital Improvements Program (C.I.P.) components. August 6, 1993 Friday Preliminary budget is delivered to the City Council members. August 1993 City Council holds work sessions to review Capital Improvements Program. August 19, 1993 Thursday County must notify City of the public hearing dates selected by school districts. Sept 1, 1993 Department of Revenue is to certify Local Government Aid amounts. September 1993 City Council approves C.I.P. Sept 9, Last day for adoption of the Preliminary Budget and the Preliminary tax levy by the City Council. Sept 14, 1993 Certify preliminary budget and preliminary tax levy to the County. City must also inform the County of City budget public hearing dates. Nov 10 - Nov 23, 1993 County must mail individual property tax notices to each property owner. Nov 29 - Dec 20, 1993 Public hearings on the budget to be held. Exact dates will be determined after school districts set their hearings. December 7, 1993 Tuesday All counties to hold budget public hearings. December 20, 1993 Monday Last day for the adoption of the final budget by the City Council. December 27, 1993 Monday Last day to certify final tax levy and final budget to the County. ALL DATES AFTER AUGUST 6 ARE TENTATIVE UNTIL THE LEGISLATIVE SESSION HAS ENDED. I