Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992 02-24 CCP Regular Session r� CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FEBRUARY 24, 1992 7 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Opening Ceremonies 4. Open Forum 5. Council Report 6. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda -All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed form the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 7. Approval of Minutes: *a. January 27, 1992 - Regular Session *b. February 10, 1992 - Regular Session 8. Mayoral Reappointments: a. Park & Recreation Commission b. Planning Commission 9. Appointment of Election Judges: *a. Election Judges for April 7 1992 Presidential Prima g � p 10. Planning Commission Items: (7:10 p.m.) a. Planning Commission Application No. 92004 submitted by Rita M. Bonnell requesting special use permit approval to operate a beauty shop in the lower level of her home at 6840 Bryant Avenue North. -This application was reviewed and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at their February 13, 1992, meeting. 11. Ordinances: (7:15 p.m.) a. An Ordinance Vacating a Drainage and Utility Easement in Centaur Addition -This ordinance is offered for a first reading this evening. b. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances to Require a Minimum Separation between Certain Early Morning /24 Hour Commercial Operations and Single - Family and Two - Family Dwellings in R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts -This ordinance amendment was offered for a first reading on January 27, 1992, published in the City's official newspaper on February 5, 1992, and is offered this evening for a second reading and public hearing. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- February 24, 1992 c. An Ordinance Adding Chapter 20 Regarding Trees to the City Ordinances -This ordinance was offered for a first reading on January 27, 1992, published in the City's official newspaper on February 5, 1992, and is offered this evening for a second reading. 1. Resolution Adopting Annual List of Allowable Boulevard Trees 2. Resolution Establishing Fee for Registration of Tree Contractors 12. Discussion Items: a. Cable Casting of Council Meetings b. Communications Task Force Update c. Hockey Booster Funding Request d. Legislative Update e. Brooklyn Boulevard Study (Draft RFP) 13. Resolutions: *a. Requesting Hennepin County Place a Sixty Day Hold on the Auction of a Tax Forfeited Land Parcel *b. Authorizing the Purchase of One (1) Street Sweeper -This item will be purchased using storm drainage utility funds. *c. Amending the 1991 and 1992 General Fund Budgets to Carry Forward Certain Police Department Appropriations *d. Establishing Improvement Project 1992 -02, Local Area Network System for the City of Brooklyn Center Facilities, Approving Specifications, and Accepting Proposals - Approved in 1992 data processing budget. e. Authorizing an Appropriation from the Capital Improvements Fund for the City's Share of the Cost of the Evergreen Park School Playground Project f. Supporting a Cultural Diversity Training Program *14. Licenses 15. Adjournment MEMO THIS ITEM WILL POSSIBLY BE COMING UP AT THE OPEN FORUM SESSION ON FEBRUARY 24, 1992 * * * ** MEMORANDUM * * * ** Date : October 21, 1991 To : Jerry Splinter From : Tom Slupske Subject : Taffic on 59th and 60th Avenues Attached are copies of a petition signed by 90% of the neighbors that live this area. We all want something done to decrease the amount of and speed of traffic in our neighborhood. Feel free to contact me for any questions. Office: 560 -1975 Home: 560 -2997 R t s ruL .�� .� ..r ,.. / m, —,, . �� ..��� JIJ 1 �• �, ,ra Jorr �, III mx" ` xrr wY ka i} rar .t 1 117 J/u ',ra AJE rk i y 1 f d , - rcn � .. � 1 Ear � :.) mr txef ••�.. "1 is � � a /.� ,t saY ? rfv t.0 I eS bat -. t(SY t t4Y AvP Tf � ,� L. -,- 'r � t � Mrr r �(41 �.• i IiLS., taal t t 19Ja /'lN I e � •J (.I ( � y � ! -: F � .N. �'.i l yf� � SW F Sal I� --- � k _.. -. -_... 1, ) �. —lr]i - . ... � -�J✓'t SaY � )' rvl 1. 'T, S R / TZ " r)JI` • JaY � rl ""_ JAI (10 . - � l�if :� � .A 1 ' lel l,il (bll c T f Alr n , TYT tr i''Sfrl tit.) I { - o, nu Ar piel MIS „ra 9A ,� (i`a' Jf >! L nl ti� 1 MIS n _ a nu to,1 )R 'J (rl ]I/I .. j_Tr Arf..�- _J'a rt__ -..AW '� • J+JE STI]L alli C lA� -- J,py ppa a t LIT,.i (1e1 '� w � .�• � ` AOOa � (YI � � L'L__j S,pr g � \ � �� (UI 6 t . . t -_ -- - • .. N wr r }(I F tir j•; 31�a,, ti(s �_ —^.,,_ rr-e Cet� t.l. " - ��. � .,1 0i. *.!• .,---- -- ---- ---�rl-rrf - I Sr't7t1:DA1F ?frp iDOp Ic. ' 1 �' r . •* rmJ J I .azt II ��.. ,• � _: ell, Al y CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF BROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE: 569 -3300 C ENTER F AX: 569 -3494 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 December 18, 1991 Mr. Tom Slupske 5918 Abbott Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Dear Mr. Slupske: The City's Administrative Traffic Committee has met to review updated traffic information regarding your October 21, 1991 petition. It appears that traffic conditions have not changed substantially since the last time this issue was addressed, in 1985 and 1986. However, we will be obtaining more extensive radar surveys and traffic counts. The Committee will take this issue again through the same process as was followed at that time - through neighborhood meetings and the neighborhood advisory group. This will begin after the new year. I will keep you apprised of this process. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Sincerely, Diane Spector Public Works Coordinator Y O N seeui+�uan a� -,w t y O r CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING EVALUATION ACCIDENT SUMMARY Intersection: ���1 . ��p 14 I,,e I ) I No. of I No. of I I I I Total I Property I Personal I No. of I i No. of I Damage I Injury ( Fatal I I Year I Accidents I Accidents I Accidents I Accidents I I i I I i "� I I i I I I I I I i I I I i I I I I TOTAL i Z 41 I Average for � �. I Years I I ( (O� `rt' I I 9 I Q I I Average for I I I I last 2 Years I I I I I I Notes: a 1 (Title) _ Date: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING EVALUATION ACCIDENT SUI -MARY Intersection.: '/(r l�J� / �Z ' �G �'� 4�(, I I No. of N o. of I I I Total ( Property I Personal I No. of I ( No. of ( Damage I Injury I Fatal ( Year I Accidents ( Accidents I Accidents ( Accidents i o I I I I I I ( TOTAL I I I I I i I I I I I i Average for ( /j 7 Years I Average for (last 2 Years Notes: 12 zr�7i��c By: G , (Title) Date: / � /�!� / RADAR SURVEYS 59TH AVENUE (BROOKLYN BOULEVARD TO XERXES) #OF AVERAGE MEDIAN 85TH gib SPEED DATE T/ME VEHICLES SPEED SPEED SPEED L IMIT DIRECTION 04/09/86 W 0745 -0800 56 30.4 30.8 35.0 30 04/09/86 W 0905 -1005 105 30.5 29.8 36.0 30 04/10/86 TH 0700 -0800 160 32.3 31.9 37.8 30 04/14/86 M 0650 -0750 125 30.1 29.8 34.6 30 04/16/86 W 0900 -1000 117 30.3 30.5 34.6 30 03/19/90 M 1515 -1845 498 28.8 28.9 34.0 30 E/W 03/20/90 TU 1515 -1845 520 28.6 28.9 34.6 30 E/W 03/21/90 W 1530 -1845 469 28.5 28.3 33.4 30 E/W 05/16/90 W 0645 -0815 136 29.4 29.3 36.3 30 E/W 05/17/90 TH 0645 -0815 91 26.6 26.0 32.6 30 E/W 05118/90 F 0645 -0815 142 30.8 30.7 35.6 30 E/W 06/03/91 M 1400 -1500 93 32.8 32.8 37.4 30 E/W 06/03/91 M 1600 -1700 116 31.6 32.1 35.3 30 E/W 06/11/91 TU 1200 -1245 90 30.8 31.0 35.2 30 E/W 11/27/91 W 0700 -0800 88 27.6 27.2 31.5 30 E/W 11/27/91 W 1230 -1330 150 29.2 29.1 33.8 30 E/W 12/03/91 TU 1630 -1730 125 27.2 27.1 31.4 30 E/W RADAR SURVEYS 60TH AVENUE (BROOKLYN BOULEVARD TO XERXES) OF,. AVERAGE MEDIAN 85TH a/a SPEED DATE TIME VEHICLES SPEED SPEED SPEED LIMIT DIPECT[ON 04/11/86 F 0640 -0740 17 30.3 31.3 35.0 30 04/14/86 M 0830 -0930 20 27.1 24.0 32.8 30 12/17/87 TH 0640 -0740 20 23.5 22.0 28.0 30 12/17/87 TH 1630 -1730 46 24.6 23.8 29.1 30 12/29/87 TU 1630 -1730 26 25.8 25.5 30.5 30 01/05/88 TU 0700 -0800 36 25.1 25.1 29.5 30 12/04/91 W 0700 -0800 21 23.2 23.0 26.5 30 E/W 12/04/91 W 1200 -1300 24 24.8 24.6 28.0 30 E/W 12/04/91 W 1615 -1715 45 24.3 24.4 27.4 30 E/W CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF ] BROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 r TELEPHONE: 569 -3300 J C E NT E R FAX: 569 -3494 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 January 27, 1992 Mr. Tom Slupske 5918 Abbott Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Dear Mr. Slupske: The City's Administrative Traffic Committee has met to review updated information regarding your petition for four -way stops at all intersections on 59th and 60th Avenues from Brooklyn Boulevard to Xerxes Avenue North. Accident History and Radar The updated accident history shows that virtually all accidents in the corridor occur at Brooklyn Boulevard. There have been a few accidents along the corridor over the past four years, but not enough to warrant, on accident history atone, stop signs. Updated radar surveys indicate average speeds have dropped over the past few years. While the 85th percentile speed on 59th Avenue does exceed the speed limit, which indicates that 15 percent of the vehicles are speeding, it too has been dropping, which is encouraging. Traffic Committee's Decision The Administrative Traffic Committee continues to believe that four way stop signs at every intersection is not an effective strategy. The ATC has agreed to install four way stop signs at Abbott Avenue on both 59th and 60th Avenues on a one year trial basis. All other cross streets will be posted with two way stop signs, stopping the north -south traffic. During the next year, periodic radar surveys will be taken, as well as traffic counts and accident surveys. At the end of the year, this information will be evaluated to determine the effectiveness of the four way stops. These signs will he installed within the next 30 -45 days. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me or Director of Public Works Sy Knapp. Sincerely, l �rn('F1 Diane Spector AM PUBLIC WORKS COORDINATOR L � fr 59th/60th Petition History of Complaint Complaint: June, 1985 0 Original complaint from resident of 59th Avenue regarding speeding on 59th, and plan in Comprehensive Plan to close off 59th. She was in favor of this. 0 Neighborhood meetings 11- 14 -85, 5 -1 -86. Invited residents CR 10 to 63rd, BB to Xerxes. Well attended. Discussed four options, plus suggestions from residents. No consensus. Some vigorously supported closing off access from BB. Some supported stop signs. Some thought should be resolved by improving CR 10 & BB. Concern about shifting problem to other streets. 4 Options: 1. Close 59th at Beard 2. Partial barricade at Beard., allow eastbound traffic only into bank; westbound traffic would be through 3. Convert 59th into one -way westbound 4. Divert traffic at 59th & Abbott 0 Referred to Central Neighborhood Advisory Group for its input. Met 7- 30 -86. Discussed all options and neighborhood comments. Held public hearing. All 59th Ave residents in attendance by show of hands favored blocking off 59th at Beard. Group recommended to Planning Commission that staff find ways of reducing traffic without barriers, such as by publicity, and to look into feasibility of sidewalk. 0 Planning Commission 8- 28 -86. Reviewed all information. Concurred with Advisory Group recommendation and referred to City Council. 0 City Council, 10- 13 -86. Manager noted that PC recommended 59th be left open, although it appears that a majority of the 59th Ave residents wanted it closed off. Concerned that traffic would shift to 60th or 61st. Council concurred with PC. No further action taken. Petition: October, 1991 0 At November meeting ATC reviewed updated accident history (minimal). Agreed that would take through neighborhood advisory group process or else try installing stop signs on a trial basis after new year began. 0 At January meeting, reviewed updated radar. ATC agreed conditions simply hadn't changed since last time this was reviewed. After discussion, ATC decided to install on a one -year trial basis, four -way stops at Abbott and 59th & 60th, and two way at the other intersections, with 59th /60th through streets. Notified Slupske. 0 1 -30 -92 letter from Slupske, stating response is not acceptable and notifying of intent to appeal. Issues: o Agree that there is a cut - through problem O Most appropriate solution would physically divert traffic from the streets O Relief could come from improved capacity at CR 10 and BB. This is a Hennepin County issue. Also, extending the BB median to block turns crossing BB onto 59th. Again, HC issue. Also, would hinder access to bank. O Bank feels very strongly that nothing should be done to hinder traffic to it. O Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices has specific warrants for installation of multiway stops. Most important, "It should ordinarily be used only where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. " Warrants include: excessive accident history (5 or more in 12 months); traffic entering intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours; average delay to minor street traffic is at Yeast 30 seconds during maximum hour. O Manual suggests that before installing stop signs, less restrictive measures be considered. It also notes that "Care should be taken not to install too many signs. A conservative use of regulatory and warning signs is recommended as these signs, if used to excess, tend to lose their effectiveness." Also, "These [ regulator signs shall be erected wherever needed to fulfill this purpose [indicate legal requirements], but unnecessary mandates should be avoided. O Only 50% of the corner property owners on 60th signed petition; 75% of 59th. These owners would be most affected by noise, exhaust, speedups /slowdows, etc. O Our experience has shown that drivers, when confronted by what seem to be unnecessary stop signs, learn to "roll through" the stop sign, leaving t he intersection more dangerous than before. Residents near 62nd and Beard confirmed this at a neighborhood meeting. o Multiway stops on 70th have had no effect on cut - through traffic from 69th. i CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF B:iROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTE R EMERGENCY- POLICE - FIRE 911 TO: Central Neighborhood Advisory Group FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works DATE: July 22, 1986 RE: Through Traffic in the Neighborhood Between Brooklyn Boulevard and Xerxes Avenue from County Road 10 to 63rd Avenue Definition of the Issue This matter was brought to the attention of City staff by a resident in June, 1985. That resident reported that there was heavy traffic on 59th Avenue and particularly noted that much of the traffic was oriented towards Brookdale. That resident stated that she was aware of a proposal (contained in the City's Comprehensive Plan) to close 59th Avenue at Beard in order to eliminate the cut - through traffic and requested that action be taken. Subsequent discussion of the issue by the Administrative Traffic Committee, by neighborhood residents who have attended two public meetings which have been held regarding the matter, and by others have raised other questions regarding vehicular accident records, pedestrian safety, site distance at the intersections, speeding traffic and other items of concern. Traffic /Accident Information The Engineering Staff has taken traffic counts on various streets within the neighborhood at several different times. Following is a summary of counts which have been taken: A traffic count taken at 59th Avenue between Abbott and Beard Avenues in 1985 indicated average daily traffic of approximately 1,810 cars. On May 12 to 14, 1986 traffic counts were taken at four locations and are summarized as follows and shown on Exhibit B attached): „ 71�e $a.Ket�ii.ra d oze �'t� „ July 22, 1986 Page 2 Average Daily Location Traffic Count 59th Avenue between Abbott and Beard 1,809 60th Avenue between Abbott and Beard 814 62nd Avenue between Xerxes and Beard 441 Beard Avenue between Mumfo rd and 63rd 639 'Note: Attached (Exhibit C) is a data sheet which shows the distribution of traffic on 60th Avenue North on an hourly basis. During the week starting June 24, 1986 through June 30, 1986 a traffic count was taken on 59th Avenue North between Abbott Avenue and Beard Avenue. That count showed an average weekday traffic count of 1,922 vehicles per day and a weekend count of 1,134 vehicles per day. Attached (Exhibit D) is a data sheet which shows all of these counts on an hourly basis. Also attached (Exhibit E) is a summary of traffic accidents which have been recorded by the Brooklyn Center Police Department during the past three and one half years on 59th Avenue from Xerxes Avenue to Brooklyn Boulevard. It is noted that of the ten recorded accidents five occurred at the intersection of 59th Avenue and Xerxes, four occurred at the intersection of 59th Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard and one occurred between Xerxes and Brooklyn Boulevard. None of the accidents involved pedestrians. Comprehensive Plan Proposal - 1980 The 1980 Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City Council with City Planning Commission approval includes an acknowledgement t a PP ment tha through traffic fic g g P does exist on 59th Avenue, and includes a proposal to resolve that problem by constructing a traffic barrier on 59th Avenue just West of Beard Avenue. This proposal is shown as Alternate No. 1 on Exhibit F attached. This Exhibit also notes the operational characteristics resulting from this plan. Administrative Traffic Committee Proposal The Administrative Traffic Committee (composed of the City Manager, the Chief of Police and the Director of Public Works) has reviewed iew d this matter and has suggested several alternatives to the plan as recommended within the Comprehensive Plan. These alternatives are shown as Alternates 2, 3 and 4 on the attached Exhibits C, H and I. Each of these Exhibits also notes the operational characteristics resulting from an implementation of each of the plans. July 22, 1986 Page 3 The Administrative Traffic Committee also considered the fact that if through traffic is prohibited on 59th Avenue, it is highly probable that a major portion of that through traffic would shift to 60th Avenue North unless steps were taken to prohibit through traffic on 60th Avenue also. Accordingly the Administrative Traffic Committee recommends that if any of the alternatives are implemented on 59th Avenue, a hammerhead type of traffic turnaround be constructed on 60th Avenue just Westerly of Beard Avenue in order to prohibit through traffic on 60th Avenue (see Exhibit J). In addition, the Administrative Traffic Committee (ATC) considered the possibility that if through traffic were prohibited both on 59th and 60th Avenues it is possible that 62nd Avenue may experience a significant increase in the amount of through traffic. It is the opinion of ATC that this will not happen. However, in the event that it does occur, the ATC then also recommends the construction of a hammerhead type turnaround on 62nd Avenue just Westerly of Beard Avenue (see Exhibit K). After some consideration of the alternatives for 59th Avenue it is the opinion of the ATC that alternates 1 and 4 are the most feasible and effective. Alternates 2 and 3 rely on the ability to enforce one way traffic regulations and it is noted that both of these alternatives still allow westbound traffic to continue uninterrupted through the neighborhood. While Alternate 1 would be the most effective alternate when considering 59th Avenue only it is suggested that Alternate 4 should be considered in conjunction with the total neighborhood analysis (i.e. in conjunction with the consideration for hammerhead turnarounds on 60th Avenue and on 62nd Avenue). Alternate Proposals Attached (as Exhibit Q is a summary of options which have been suggested by residents of the neighborhood at meetings held on November 14, 1985 and on May 1, 1986, and /or by way of written communication to City officials. On that exhibit we have also provided staff commentary regarding each of the suggested options. Analysis and Recommendations There is little question that a good deal of shortcutting of traffic does occur on this section of 59th Avenue. It is our estimate that approximately two thirds of the total traffic on 59th Avenue is traffic which does not have an origin or destination within this residential neighborhood. On the other hand, it is noted that there is no traffic capacity problem, with the exception of some minor capacity problems at the Xerxes Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard intersections. July 22, 1986 Page 4 Our analysis of the traffic accidents during the past three and one half years indicates that the only significant accident problems which have occured are at Xerxes Avenue and at Brooklyn Boulevard. No accidents involving pedestrians have been recorded by the Police Department. Accordingly, it is recommended that any proposed change be considered on the basis of its effect on the entire neighborhood. It is important that a perceived problem not be solved by chasing that problem around the neighborhood. Respectful y submitted,, Sy Knapp Director of Public Works SK: jn . � == �t�!�iq� m in � - • • � � ��� t • - I�j� I1�1� �� MIS IM IV' 4 IM wm M W M mm = MKS M&R JIM imimm - - - — - - \� - _ - - - - �c _ 6TH AVE N. _ BROOKLANE-- 6 _ - - - - PARK - - - - ul - z GA 0 z 6q A r - -� - R N T N. At a - - Z a Q tI SCHOOL w x AVE. - N. - _ Q - - - PO AVE. N .!'� VARLIN - NE DR - - j a iT1R \� w O HENR ROA O �Q� " C \ter niy a - - - a - 2 _ �� m I PARK \ -' . [ .✓�'��`\ -A CITY AvE - - N - 63RD AVE CIVIC CE� N �' I �- ' 0 .a INO. Z ANE- J 639 62ND VE. w 62ND 2 �O ROAD �\ j w A N i - WJ — -- — z NO. II D w N. - - GARDE J W ✓X m til J -� JQNE'T Q L_L_Ll_l�J CITY ? ¢ w LA E wANGSTAD 441 C� PARK r IYO -Xka> J x _ fL PARK \,��� 3g i4 "ixXh� �. N. 3 �\ \��i\ � ,� � om- -- 4�3 JC� , J� X - - - 61ST AVE. Q + 35 61ST AVE. 3 2 1/ 11ENN. D I GOVT SERV CENTE L KYLArvN PARK - �JF - COMMODORE r y N0. 4 ' AVE tJ z - p �' - -- a a- 01 w w 591/2 Vv - - -- Z IZ - - - - -- i - AV E .' arc W I W o — a z - - -- -- i31f 1 a a 581/2 w NO. IIIt - - - - -- o Z 1809 °RT "w AVERAGE DAILY .f. - - - -'J q y - oJ - o— TRAFFIC COUNTS MAY 12 - 14, 1986 jOPEN SPACE \ x LL - 57Tt! AVE 4 l ANE - - �i o ► O c == � s (/ J \ , - a /\ O C S A" N 0 10 z�x1 Y -- - - -- -'1 x I w BURQUEST L 4 VE. \i NORTHPORT -\>( PARK CK ERG R. 1p For,n MHD 29176 (3 -73) PORTABLE TRAFFIC RECORDER DATA SHEET LOCATION 1� �Q �l/Ps -� ev P COUNTY o STATION NO. y ,, QJ - 1 a7 4 '�ele Qy��� I COUNT BEGINNING DATE e��l S bra DATA BY F DATE S � a S -/3 5 - /4L AVERAGE of COUNT MON TUE WED THUR FRI SAT SUN V WEEK DAY WEEK END 12 -IAM 5 6 SS' 1 -2 0 6 3. 2-3 / O p� 3 -4 S O s 4 -5 e 5 -6 // /0 6 -7 19 23 7 -8 39 3 d s' 8 -9 u3 3.o 9 -10 10-11 _g;::;. 0 11 -12N 3 9 ¢a3 12-1 1-2 3 2-3 u 3 3 -4 4-5 �' 7� 7-7 s' 5-6 5 G 70 6 �5 7 -8 8- 9 5e8 u 9 9 -10 / 3o a� 11 -I2M 5 TOTAL 566 8a s' a 37 SKETCH AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC o N Remarks: // T 1 RECORDER TYPE HR 0 MR C 4 MACH N0. TAPE NO. FILE EXHIBIT C ,Form MHO 29176 (3 -73) PORTABLE TRAFFiC RECORDER DATA SHEE i o LOCATION /`�'< Ph�� p /t/� COUNTY STATION NO. 7 ee,:7 GL �C� P �u2, 16 COUNT BEGINNING DATE L1"& he c?S DATA BY A� c.fiine- C/.v »t �.•t �..• ..e V�wC clu..e OATS . o? �1 d5 o�<o w o7 /',��, .?8 -/2-1- -a 9 , - AVERAGE of COUNT DAY MON TUE WED THUR FRI SAT SUN WEEKDAY WEEK END 12 -IAtul ? // '7 1 -2 S 3 2 -3 CZ 7 S 3 -4 / / 3 S a OR �4 4 -5 a 3 1 3 5 - 8 G 13 s-7 - T 3� SSG S S S'7 9 5 4 3 ? 7 -8 /a7 131 Oslo 8 -9 116 8 7 1 3 9 -10 /0/ 96 e6 '76 1// 9 10 -II /a6 67 //4 1 / .QS 13 44.;Z 16'7 9/ 11 -12N 13 99 106 /00 /3B /9/ G6 //5 /.z9 12 - /6$ 140 i/< / 3 1 -2 /da 1 /09 /37 / / /sd <6 1 (4 / 7<6 2- / 57 1116 /-�S 1 /u 7 7 /:56 3-4 11 fa /7-Z 63 X7 1141 o P /6 1 55 /59 /77 a/6 S 63 /7% 6/ 5 -s / 7 /a 136 /� ;A 55 /7 6u i/ 93 8'7 / /6 5 6 A.3 119 us I 7 -8 9 754 90 99 //0 4C 9 6- 93 56 I 8 -9 69 60 7 75. 6G S[3 36 - 6 6 39 t 1 9 -10 1 55 77 6 S 1547 S SG 0 61 Sc j 10 -11 11 .73 ad /8 IQ S4 ad 39 3a 11 -12M 1' SC a 6 30 ./ TOTAL d /63 -� .z3 7 /7S/ r9/d a� �� i�36 � 9� �� SKETCH Z AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC /qa� w O N RemarkS: i n cc w 59TH AVE N. m RECORDER TYPE: HR 0 MR G EXHIBIT D MACH N0. TAPE NO. FILE ACCIDENT SUMMARY 59TH AVENUE NORTH FROM XERXES AVENUE TO BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 1983 83 -01693 59TH & XERXES AVENUE 02 -04 -83 1432 MV PD 83 -5875 59TH & XERXES AVENUE 05 -05 -83 1436 MV MV PD 83 -07807 59TH & BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 06 -10 -83 1605 PI 1984 84 -19336 59TH & XERXES AVENUE 12 -31 -84 1209 MV MV PD 84 -18326 59TH & ABBOTT AVENUE 12 -13 -84 0938 MV MV PD Z 1985 85 -209 59TH & BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 01 -04 -85 1741 MV MV PD 85 -3065 59TH & XERXES AVENUE 02 -27 -85 2148 MV RAN OFF 85 -2444 59TH & BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 02 -15 -85 2256 MV MV PI 85 -16677 59TH & BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 10 -25 -85 0934 MV MV PI JANUARY_, 1986 THROUGH MAY 1986 86 -2438 59TH & XERXES AVENUE 02 -13 -86 1610 MV MV PI - EXHIBIT E O O z z O p o uj z W Z m Q Q > W x O ~ Q Q W > Lij J Q O � Y x Q Y w m z cc m Q w O O N } c m �"' -- - ----�. -�-- 59 T H AVE, N Q, COMPLETE-STREET-CLOSURE BETWEEN ENTRANCE TO RETAIN TWO WAY TRAFFIC 1ST BROOKDALE BANK BETWEEN XERXES AND BEARD AND BEARD AVENUE AVENUES 0 PROHIBITS SHORT CUTTING TO I ROOKDALE FROM BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 0 PROHIBITS SHORT CUTTING TO ST BROOKDALE ANK FROM XERXES 0 PROHIBITS NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC ACCESS zQ iST BR00 DALE BANK AND BROOKLYN BOULEVARD (EXCEPT VIA tLTH AVENUE 0 ALLOWS NEIGHBORHOOD ACCESS TO XERXES AVENUE x Alternate 1 O O D z z O O > > > z cn Z I Q Q > u X O p t— Q D ui t— = Q lU > J W 00 �- Y X Q m m co z cc: O Q N cc CD ------ - - ,,,, 59 TH AVE. N Q, CLOSE SOUTH HALF OF 59 TH ESTABLISH "ONE -WAY (WESTBOUND) ONLY" AVENUE WITH ISLAND - TO REGULATIONS ON ONE BLOCK OF 59 TH PROHIBIT EASTBOUND AVENUE (BETWEEN ABBOTT & BEARD AVENUES) TRAFFIC AT THIS POINT 0 PROHIBITS SHORT CUTTING TO ROOKDALE (FROM BROOKLYN BOULEVARD) 0 ALLOWS WESTBOUND TRAFFIC TO 1ST BROOKDALE BANK & BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 0 ALLOWS NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC TO ENTER /EXIT FROM _ XERXES AVENUE 0 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC ENTERING FROM BROOKLYN BOULEVARD WOULD BE REQUIRED TO ENTER AT 60TH AVENUE Alternate 2 O C o z z o ' > > > z cn I Q Q Q X O p F- r _ Q w > -� `r INSTALL O H Y x Q p m SIGNS m w O O Q N �. m 59 T H AVE. N O, TWO -WAY TRAFFIC TO BEARD AVENUE ONLY ONE WAY (WESTBOUND) TRAFFIC SIGNS FROM XERXES TO BEARD AVENUES 0 PROHIBITS SHORT CUTTING TO BROOKDALE 0 ALLOWS WESTBOUND TRAFFIC DIRECT ACCESS TO 1ST BROOKDALE BANK AND BROOKLYN� BOULEVARD BUT - REOUIRES RETURN VIA 1 AVENUE x 0 ALLOWS NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC TO ENTER ROM XERXES = AVENUE (UTILIZING L UTH T TURN LANE AT 5 TH AVENUE) a' BUT - MUST EXIT AT AVENUE z Alternate 3 o o Z o _� w z J > L1J Q m Q Q > W L1 z * J ¢ O m Q W > z4 W m z In X Q p m � Q N O x m c -� I... ' 59 TH AVE, NO, CONSTRUCT RAFFIC DIVERTER AT ABBOTT 9 TH AVENUES 0 PROHIBI TS- SHORT. CUTTING TO BROOKDALE (FROM BROOKLYN-BOULEVARD) 0 PROHIBITS SHORT CUTTINNG TO 1ST AROOKDALE BANK (FROM XERXES AVENUE) 0 ALLOWS NEIGHBORHOOD ACCESS TO X l ERXES AVENUE X 0 ALLOWS NEIGHBORHOOD ACCESS TO 1 ST BROOKDALE BANK ;•; ? AND BROOKLYN BOULEVARD (VIA CIRCUITOUS ROUTE 4211 03 TO 6CTH AVENUE AND RETURN) Alternate 4 ,1 ". Y �1• :108 .j •r,. '� � r r . fi ,. �° �,_ ... Y -`�> i �•'+►� •�, r k .. � i±�•. +'�• ' �'' � • N t - y+f1�i� ;34�:1'.:1•� , �I �• '� � .:. . a ! Cr.... '] �y mi �yy l �ri \' �1 .�, M',j ' �Y'it � •�r � w �' ��. k . �l kS � V 1•!}� !� �� ^• ,R _ �' ��.• • . I y �r ti '� tin . ,. w.�, � ► � - j � v '1n S' rtt1 _' .: wy, �'�. '•a'. •,� ♦ .i � 1- 1 i•,. SK �'� - 7r, s. r i��tit �". � ` y� "'�„> � , - "'� ar..f T� . 7�� r "•YYY••• �,,, t. �.�� `�. : � rd' . k yx S � � ,, rte. y +. S „ ' 7 r � y tr t t •�..rii!.t,...s -c, . r ,Fyta .rte. c >r'• °L- ttF�Jf 7�'t." �' s'�"1 - +t'�. t ”, v�' 'S`y ) „r '�• i F '�•�f' c•,IN J ,,., •J' �, •:r ;��•.� r r•.,. 1� 1Z ..- �NJ ll �, H y r f •, �J� AA r{'/'•a� Y ` j A .I �N �'r'bG r •.'� ' M/ °� 'r � •�_. � •`�` �. .. =ate d1'^� nw��i.� .....�.� �r.y..J�..t. ! r x ai. �.v ywf v :.,1:. ✓ � , y • a �j- . y° S �, */. �� + , r ri r ...{ . •r„G:1 J r '`M. a!g1rr; i ^ °. 'S. { v � • .�, r '' /r'! � • �►. _ _ t ^:' _ ; . t", ►t f' qq az - •i' / 45 y,� , n. ■ '>.✓, I!'".,. i' v.�l!�^'•i. tlt y r4 �..i+ A "A `'�} , : - •ry • q •` •u _ - if�t % \ ,�:� •• ,Q� a F"'*f' < S � ;•, � {,S"..�'� 'r, - � 5 >r a .:.� � � i. �r L' i�. i!!`� '?�,. `�'' ," ..t+ -v� :... ts:,,,� ,. a.,. �- •:� -�: '�' ::t•+�'j 4,.u; .� c,, ��jty tY ) .,♦ r t '^3 a{.t ', T� r .Mr •�•• .,� - " ate `n >S ar 'j '• r.•••, ar •r - 'J:..'i �^ . .+. ,• .� { r if„`..� ti F ?• ,. >. , 3 vt ��- .' "� Lr•' ,.!�!Y>i� �. +� : if '� r•�+Y, C. - .1];:a!' ..y'�.v..�r ri.., l�'� j... y. >' �Ti:' �F. �. > + o ..,,... •..,. Yy -. ,_ � , i � S� +.�;• � ��Y ju��?•�Ma i�: ' t'ynl r: � � � y f �', �fl • a " �t .�a: �'# Y �'. .� ' oti� j• 'v::_: "�Y y'..`1,�t r' �Ee•�� t °'�y,,,., - J-��j" ,►/•: r .'���x',''�'>•', .r,,,rJ'!1 ". .� y1� l�• r:•yJ ��'t!'. ` �' 1'.:.;'" ,�'�M'.fc �... r: }. ry� K..X- ;��.:>y •... • t- t r� - �.f ` 2`..:'d'� aa::� ���1F.'' . �e. 7.• ti ,.a, . �14 �r� �+', �rt •1'. -r 4 "yeti'• . P . �t y ! .'%S- �:rr1 U ' r . � 'yG '=1'" Y4 ` •l.Y�i �• �•:r k .f'a+j.i. )� .;- 'jl�•.'tie•. "� ,�,y,'�' .��'�. .J� '4. �.r .C.• y � '• Fy �k+,�,, � t - • µJ °ee[.. � � � � a �.(��{'.i aw�`y�• �A�� ..•r•�•ir;' '�". r;J. •''� d'.:w�:e u„�/i!�' t •f, Sfir' 1••,. ��r,�N f .� ^� � � r � ;e• +a.�lr�i'": L-i ".L �'�s� - �f •,a � <•�? �5;. 1' - _. ,;71 •4� ...,Yf �'�r.. }.i ♦�. ; - ' - •�.C.:., Y.: <�:'L���: [1'. ! r. .�� Y. �!7. j� •e!', �,• •Cy '�• J' '�i}.!. :'dc!if'+ .. ;� •1� � r JN'G.d � -�-•�, �•r ;, y "t��. � 4,�tto e. ..��i j ". :� �Y .S'C. y } , �.a iH:�h �,� � •� ••' > �•'� - • 7 a '�'Y• � ' '•� s•. � .. 'y �'�;� .0 _�}}} •..`'s�` \ ".�':• '•"t; �^ �� t �'� � d�:� 'i: °r V•a5`Mi �.:r ,.,.'dY' X� ��u� ;rir\ r�k -.^,� r . �K.� � .��,. � Y�aY�.1' .�J.y. ' ..TT ' t *W u"•' fin- -.� J "_ y ''Y' •' ' �Y , �T { .Ii' '�. � �. i. 7. . r *' , � ��� i _.. ..i ./ � r - t f" ; +e. �t'•t +. 1e 1 . : !. � T .. j� L� � � ` �° �` -%.-\ 4. � .� - r....•� `S .� �' 1: . �x .,.�► ! T • , r te v'?rc "�•� N } �• v - t.. ..�> -. �` j�. _ • ♦ 4 Y r ... ..t. � e : : '„ t! 4w..�'_.wa F r ... a 1 •1:` r _ i err.. y , �... i.. rrt�� bti a IF )r ,} � ! .--, z ,�:� /MM7.. l.� -:. p "•r"tl ys p� •� , '!•�at.'�,`C.�•�' = 1 { , �f 1: �i• •7 '•, .'It. -' yi•n .: { �'Ij f:. +� C',.. .,. ..Si r �. r.. �,, r 'i �, i _t,� h } �' ;7w .�..li ,. f 1 w �. Qom{ a :' + 4 t7a5.x+r�'rla. $ s r y�.7tTy N �.•' "!... �1.:7.r7 ": l � z .:I ' - �"+y+. nvl (,.{•,Ti"S�•FJr.!''�" l.1'tr,' ..!4`1 4 L I _ ,• -r (.� t'- �,f_,., . i.•A,rfr..+c!r.' �' ti. : >,w•�.... .° .a.:..• F, �r� ,' - ' = -- 1! 171 F �• �< ..fir- , f 1.rp . a :, Ti �:�`Qr,lii�''- ``��KK4 I : y � rM•[' S . � f, 1 • lVtf�'✓�' `.„ �i. y/M��'I7�!'r4*Cr�l'f�•l!°a.i.IW M1{"'" '6•.f • ... _ ....p.r•.�.�,�, :. ^: 7 ` ^�. `,N lot r AS ♦ r, a•. i ' ,�.. Y L .1..,.. 7i• ....iA;•,,f:`_L < — `�' r��5�� .. x'"`R• � j 3 �� � ''((�� �• - '? '. ^_ Y ` r J 3� � _ . tJ.. a ., i �. .t .^ . '� } r'i•Y � r r 11[Ya...+ . ti • � � t 4 a ,� "r V` . )� .L. \.M1 .t ■ ) f u.,. r_.1_ 7W• r1r•.,N.t SA fa. N a• K.'wi' ... ' t L.r _ Vir LL > 1 �G 4 4�.z z .: }— a• f a.: �w - r, �`. I tx"f• ° � t -n om ri'�°�w"r ' r. AY I �, y �� �I+.f. a.� . •� 1 1 , r • rf1 .w, ,'il t l 1 '.'. •� r t f. 4 Y' s. � ��� � s.:::� .;,aF.•_tl"!�.it�'• '�:•� '.- y• ,t•+��'�r��:.IISP"�+�.•��M.'�in ...av�:�,. � .•• —� a• -r�l - ?C�`�� y'�'�i .�. .�tC, �Jtl •.�1Mrt � �r „�� �r.�s ^v, „t� �i 1 ,,,,ittt � �� - j� .M *�� �tq �• � �j = ';;!y ►^:. ' �C `� �� �,. '�: � •• 1 1S.��F� � t � �� , j. R10'� � ..y �, i y , ,. ''a :� : ' 1 f. — � rr V3. r � IX, ,r • ,=y .' - PY:,' �' � ✓.i S ,,t•. .'.•r - t:. rl'�. \.. Y., ) r.."r ._rt. LLJ - G_' �:;� �l ; � ti - y � �;'�� s�t`�� 2. - #� �� ;fir► _ -:�. e..', r £�. 'C F v A 4 7 S o N r ' 4 T.3 �t a i►� ti •r; a ri t r - E r mil!' �r��ill yk 1 � , l t fi 4 r „ 6� + t� J;,, °' r 4 'a., . �4 : •• r � ,,-;. J t _ J 1f ?f '� . a• lr 'k t}� ^ ? � - :l�Y. w�� 1 � ' �ia. .,.� }`�� 1`�t�i a 1 �, .i st f � k r ' '' �' R, ' _ ` .•;r y.,'. 1 ...r• ..r.. { -tea �(. - •... : v .. f Al 4� t w"s rr� 'j � t i S t ,(+L.' :�.. � t � t •� , �,r. L,�f fa ` � .:a: . t A`_r„ - / P O P •� '} � x 1 id I '. /I.Y .• f trr.' .r .'^ . .' 'r .dla '' 'r...}'' \ `.•4 •�. a- �`r :ti . t.. fit- ?'Y',^ .•'�' tgN. •, „ S^ 1 �+�[;�,� 1.+-vn 1.,,, v. � � y. o r , tl t. L� !'� - -- 1 � "��-,; ��'�� ? 1 r � r ;�'� 'h�t'� " � •'”' 1 .��N�ii . R ►,� �� �„ ^�' �:: a' v- .1"'d �. +�4 ! i t . � ,A. ] .r w L , • f.ur t » .r ,- � _ � �( s. ��; A � ,� !t � .. �" ��a..•Cgy, � v titi' L ^>.. � y}R1� r. � �!� �.tti`� •r �.� / r. 'n f • r e ,��p• ..•? t . , YY��r '9� ..,1 r .,,� •i" i : x ► ri- /," S i � r ' - •+:w.i�`'� . t „si�. r �' ��+ a � . . :�• p1F �. � ��� f � �,L;�c'� � � '� j •j� '7 �" � r �` .. r� 3: f. �w t, �;3�"Q'> > �!Y Zc _3 =� Vic. � 4 ! � t . S j 7?" �Wn'►+r `N Y � {fit•• a' 1. ..2t ` ••L'. • :�r�� \/, v�? �� ,fir >�,�n 1'�t' �y l : i ..• �'� - /'., 1 i�L . w .t t .a� • � � �!1 � .yJ � `i r. 4 f - •_ l• • . y . , r � � , f�t}��yF�l � '�1 ' �' � x ' /� ' 4 k �� Yj�7�;.��� .�y,�j ;�►4�,x� �,K' b 1' "�� � ' jF•. a a �' l .i. h A•"� 'r_ti ��_i�+t+ /Y�f ��., 1 , ` .� '/ i fi Y r'.I .h -•rr ".. t } ,F '�' AVM' �`' �!Q� yx.� •o !�S��M' w•`' ,y�i�'. • s;r'r-t�1 �.?�"• ,j �, r �, } ...a � � i � • rq .J" �. � '. ( �• ✓�.' �f'l K_ e � �,'•� .al V ��^ 'i' �- ".- __ •t 't t �,�• r• EXHIBIT L Note: Following are options suggested by citizens at the November 14, 1985 meeting, at the May 1, 1986 meeting and /or by way of written communications to City officials, Option 1 - Improve intersection of County Road 10 and Brooklyn Boulevard, especially left turn lane from southbound Brooklyn Boulevard to eastbound County Road 10. Staff Comment: Brooklyn Boulevard was recently improved by the Minnesota Department of Transportation prior to the transfer of jurisdiction for this roadway from MNDOT to Hennepin County. It is the opinion of Hennepin County officials that this roadway currently provides an acceptable level of service. The cost for further upgrading this intersection would be very substantial and it is very doubtful that Hennepin County would place a high priority on such a project. Option 2 - Add more lanes at the intersection of Brooklyn Boulevard and County Road 10. Staff Comments: Similar to comments for Option 1 Option 3 - Extend center island on Brooklyn Boulevard farther North so as to prohibit southbound vehicles on Brooklyn Boulevard to from making a left turn to 59th Avenue while allowing northbound traffic on Brooklyn Boulevard to turn right on 59th Avenue, and while allowing westbound traffic on 59th Avenue to turn right onto Brooklyn Boulevard. Staff Comment: The City's Comprehensive Plan suggests the possibility of constructing center islands on Brooklyn Boulevard from County Road 10 to the North City Limits, with openings at major intersections. City staff supports this concept as a long range goal. However, it is important that the effects of such construction be considered before proceeding either with implementation of the total plan or with a staged implementation plan. If the island is extended only to a point North of 59th Avenue, the effects would include: Diversion of cut through traffic to 60th Avenue Loss of two way access from Brooklyn Boulevard to the commercial establishments located on both sides of Brooklyn Boulevard at 59th Avenue. EXHIBIT Exhibit L - Page 2 Option 4 - Prohibit left turn from soutl: bound Brooklyn Boulevard to eastbound 59th Avenue North during certain hours (i.e. 7 to 9 a.m. and 4 to 6 P.M.). Staff Comment: Enforcement of turn prohibitions during specified hours can be generally effective in concentrated downtown areas. However, studies have shown that limited turn restrictions at isolated intersections are generally ineffective and extremely difficult to enforce. The relatively low numbers of vehicles involved at this location would not justify a high priority enforcement program. Option 5 - Install four way stop signs at all or some intersections on 59th Avenue North. Staff Comment: A stop sign is one of our most valuable and effective traffic control devices ... when used at the right place and under the right conditions. It is intended to help drivers and pedestrians at an intersection decide who has the right of way. Quite often cities use stop signs along a roadway for the expressed purpose of interrupting traffic and reducing speed. However, a number of studies have indicated that stop signs do not slow traffic at locations where the stop sign is not justified by traffic volumes. Where stop signs are installed with the intent of controlling speed or interrupting traffic the following observations have been reported: 1. There is a high incidence of intentional violations. When stop signs are erected arbitrarily and without apparent reason, violations increase rapidly. 2. Speed reduction may be effective only in the immediate vicinity of the stop sign. However, the speed between intersections often increases. 3. The noise level at intersections increases dramatically. Drivers impatient with so many stop signs begin stopping quickly and then "peeling out" quickly thereafter. Many other drivers simply "roll through" the signs. (Note: Residents near 62nd Avenue and Beard Avenue, where a 4 -Way Stop exists, have reported that a high percentage of traffic rolls through those signs.) 4. Law enforcement agencies monitoring these type of installations report that the majority of arrests and citations generally are issued to residents of the neighborhood who may have petitioned for the signs in the first place. M s v Exhibit L - Page 3 5. In addition to the above, the general increase of the use of stop signs for speed control purposes or for traffic diversion greatly increases the air pollution levels in the city, wastes gas and generally increases vehicle operation costs. Option 6 - Post "No Trucks" signs on 59th Avenue. Staff Comments: It is recognized that some of the traffic on 59th Avenue does consist of delivery trucks with a destination in the Brookdale area. The City does have any Ordinance allowing the posting of weight limits on residential streets when a problem exists. However, because this Ordinance is also difficult to enforce, and because staff does not regard the 59th Avenue truck traffic volume as a critical problem, staff recommends denial of this option. Option 7 - Install temporary road blocks to experiment with the various alternatives to closure or partial closure of 59th Avenue. Staff Comment: Temporary measures such as this should only be used when (a) it is not possible to accurately predict the results of a permanent measure; or (b) when the problem to be resolved is temporary and will be resolved permanently by other measures. Neither of these conditions exist in this instance. In addition it is noted that whenever traffic patterns are changed there is a period of time when confusion exists and the number of accidents rise. Accordingly, it is not recommended that temporary closures be used on an experimental basis. Option 8 - Make 59th Avenue one way westbound and 60th Avenue one way eastbound. Staff Comment: The establishment of one way pairs of streets is normally done as a capacity improvement measure. As noted above, no capacity problem exists on these streets. In addition, it is noted that establishment of one way streets would not reduce the volume of traffic shortcutting through the neighborhood and would very probably have the adverse effect, i.e. to increase the volume. In addition, there would be substantial mis- direction of traffic in the neighborhood. Option 9 - Close 59th and 62nd Avenues at Xerxes Avenue North rather than an Brooklyn Boulevard. i Exhibit L - Page 4 Staff Comment: If only 59th and 62nd Avenues were closed to traffic the shortcutting traffic would very probably be rerouted to 60th Avenue. Closure of median openings on Xerxes Avenue at the various intersections could reduce some of the shortcutting traffic. However, the loss of convenient access to Xerxes Avenue would probably be more detrimental to the neighborhood than the loss of direct access to Brooklyn Boulevard. In addition, the closure of medians along Xerxes Avenue would adversely affect access to the residential neighborhood East of Xerxes Avenue. If the intent of this suggested option was to construct turnarounds on the East -West streets at a point West of Xerxes Avenue, it is noted that the location of homes and driveways in this area would make this difficult if not impossible. Option 10 Reduce speed limit to 20 miles per hour. Staff Comment: State law provides that the speed limit in all urban areas is 30 miles per hour unless a different one.is approved by the Commissioner of Transportation. Experience has shown that the Commissioner will not grant a reduced speed limit in residential areas similar to this one. Option 11 Install a semafore (traffic signal) at 59th Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. Staff Comment: The volume of traffic which exists at this intersection does not justify the installation of a traffic signal. In addition, it is noted that the installation of a traffic signal would tend to accentuate the problem rather than to decrease the traffic volumes. Option 12 Install a semi -four (traffic signal) at Xerxes Avenue and Northway Drive. Staff Comment: The traffic volumes now present at this intersection are close to meeting the established warrants for installation of a traffic signal. However, the four -way stop signs which were installed at this intersection in 1985 are effectively controlling the traffic. Installation of a traffic control signal at this location would tend to make the shortcut through the neighborhood more attractive, thereby increasing traffic on 59th Avenue and possibly 60th Avenue. a r Exhibit L - Page S Option 13 Post "No Left Turn" restrictions for southbound traffic on Xerxes Avenue to eastbound Northway Drive. Staff Comment: A number of the drivers who shortcut by way of 59th Avenue do make this left turn from Xerxes to Northway Drive. Posting of this restriction would have some tendency to discourage the shortcutting traffic. However, such restrictions would also apply to traffic originating from the central neighborhood thereby prohibiting the use of a very convenient route from the neighborhood to Brookdale. Option 14 Install speed bumps. Staff Comment: Reasons for avoiding use of the the speed bump include the following: 1. Speed bumps do not control all types of vehicles effectively. Some cars and trucks actually have a better ride over speed bumps at faster speeds. 2. Many people try to avoid speed bumps by swerving to take the bump at an angle and driving with one wheel at the edge of the road. These are dangerous but common reactions to speed bumps. 3. Speed bumps create noise and cause much vehicle damage. 4. Bicyclist often catch their bike pedals on the bumps causing dangerous spills. This is especially true of small children's bikes. 5. It is.difficult to remove snow at speed bumps with conventional snowplow equipment. 6. Policemen, firemen and other emergency vehicles can have their vehicles damaged at speed bumps while responding to emergencies. For these reasons the City of Brooklyn Center reject the speed bump as a standard traffic control device on public streets and alleys. Option 15 Install sidewalks in the neighborhood. Staff Comment: The City has a policy of constructing sidewalks in neighborhoods on the basis of a planned system which serves the corridors of demand for pedestrian traffic. It is possible that enough pedestrian traffic exists at one or more locations within this neighborhood to justify the installation of sidewalks connecting to the established sidewalk system. However, to date, staff has not been able to identify such corridors of demand. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date February 24, 1992 Agcnda Item Number C� 6 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF JANUARY 27, 1992 - REGULAR SESSION CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 10, 1992 - REGULAR SESSION DEPT. APPROVAL: - yg Patti A. Page, Deputy City Clerk MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECONEMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) • RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION JANUARY 27, 1992 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Todd Paulson at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Todd Paulson, Councilmembers Celia Scott, Jerry Pedlar, Dave Rosene, and Philip Cohen. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Works Sy Knapp, Finance Director Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning and Inspection Ron Warren, City Engineer Mark Maloney, EDA Coordinator Brad Hoffman, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, Personnel Coordinator Geralyn Barone, and Council Secretary Peggy McNabb. OPENING CEREMONIES Helen Jacobsen offered the invocation. OPEN FORUM Mayor Paulson noted the Council had received one request to use the open forum session this evening and invited Edward Noble to address the Council. EDWARD NOBLE 5117 XERXES AVENUE NORTH Mr. Noble advised the Council he is concerned with police and fire accessibility to the rear of the homes from Brooklyn Boulevard to Xerxes Avenue from 51st Avenue to 53rd Avenue. He requested a road be constructed for police and fire access to those lots so he can build a home on the land he owns. He felt the residents in that area are being charged for a service they need, but do not have. He stated it would be very easy to put a road through; however, the garages for the apartment building are currently in the way. Mr. Noble stated he is additionally concerned with the heavy truck traffic on Xerxes Avenue North. Mr. Noble concluded his address by advising the Council he has provided written information regarding his concerns to both Sy Knapp and Mark Parish. 1/27/92 - 1 - I The City Manager advised the Council staff has been communicating with Mr. Noble on this issue, and he will provide the Council with a written summary of what has been communicated to date. Mayor Paulson inquired if there was anyone else present who wished to address the Council. There being none, he continued with the regular agenda items. COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Paulson welcomed a group of Brooklyn Center seventh and eighth grade girl scouts working on their leadership badges by attending the City Council meeting. Mayor Paulson also welcomed Mr. Genelhotka, former concilmember and former city manager, Mr. Don Poss. Councilmember Rosene advised the Council he had recently observed the City's water rescue squad practicing underwater rescue maneuvers at Twin Lakes. He was very impressed with their abilities and felt confident they are very capable of doing an excellent job for Brooklyn Center. Mayor Paulson requested a copy of the minutes be forwarded to the members of the City's rescue squad noting Councilmember Rosene's observation and praise of their fine performance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Paulson inquired if any Councilmembers requested any items be removed from the consent agenda. Councilmember Cohen requested item 13a be removed from the consent agenda. Mayor Paulson advised the Council staff have requested item 13c be removed. Mayor Paulson also requested the minutes from the January 13, 1992, regular session be removed from the consent agenda. RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 92 -19 Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING OFFER FROM ALL TELEPHONE SERVICE FOR THE PURCHASE OF OKI DISCOVERY SWITCH PHONE SYSTEM The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Jerry Pedlar. The motion passed unanimously. 1/27/92 -2- LICENSES There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to approve the following list of licenses: BOWLING ALLEYS Lynbrook Bowl 6357 N Lilac Drive FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Maranatha Place 5415 - 69th Avenue N GASOLINE SERVICE STATION United States Post Office 6848 Lee Avenue N NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINES Iten Chevrolet Co. 6701 Brooklyn Blvd. Minnesota Vikings Food Service 5200 West 74th Street Graco 6820 Shingle Creek Parkway Group Health 6845 Lee Avenue N Hennepin County Service Center 6125 Shingle Creek Parkway Hiway 100 Health Club 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue N Schmitt Music 2600 Freeway Blvd. Zubaz 6707 Shingle Creek Parkway PERISHABLE VENDING MACHINES Iten Chevrolet Co. 6701 Brooklyn Blvd. Minnesota Vikings Food Service 5200 West 74th Street Graco 6820 Shingle Creek Parkway Group Health 6845 Lee Avenue N Hiway 100 Health Club 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue N Schmitt Music 2600 Freeway Blvd. Zubaz 6707 Shingle Creek Parkway SPECIAL FOOD HANDLING ESTABLISHMENT Brooklyn Center Liquor #1 1500 - 69th Avenue N Brooklyn Center Liquor #2 6520 Brooklyn Blvd. Brooklyn Center Liquor #3 1966 - 57th Avenue N Snyder Brothers Drug 1296 Brookdale Center 1/27/92 -3 - TAXICAB Loon Service 6843 Colfax Avenue N #1 Suburban Yellow Cab Co. 3555 Fifth Avenue S #89 -5 Town Taxi 2500 Washington Avenue N #77, #111, #118, #125, #127, #137, #138, #169 TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCT K -Mart 5930 Earle Brown Drive The motion passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES JANUARY 13. 1992 - REGULAR SESSION Mayor Paulson noted the correct spelling of his daughter's name is MacKenzie. He also noted on page 11, the first paragraph, that he believed Councilmember Rosene asked Mr. Stovike if the Council's concerns were valid. He added he would like these corrections made to the minutes. There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to approve the minutes of January 13, 1992, regular session as corrected. The motion passed unanimously. MAYORAL APPOINTMENTS HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESOURCES COMMISSION Mayor Paulson reappointed Agatha Eckman and Kathleen Carmody to serve on the Human Rights and Resources Commission through December 31, 1994. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar authorizing Mayor Paulson's reappointments to the Human Rights and Resources Commission. The motion passed unanimously. PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION Mayor Paulson asked that appointments to the Park and Recreation Commission be tabled for further consideration. HOUSING COMMISSION Mayor Paulson reappointed Neal Nelson, Robert Torres, Ernie Erickson, and Barb Jensen to serve on the Housing Commission through December 31, 1994. - 1/27/92 - 4 There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Rosene authorizing Mayor Paulson's reappointments to the Housing Commission. The motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION Mayor Paulson requested appointments to the Planning Commission be tabled for further consideration. NORTHWEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY COMMISSION Mayor Paulson reappointed Bettilou Christopher to serve on the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Advisory Commission through December 31, 1993. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Rosene authorizing the Mayors reappointment to the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Advisory Commission. The motion passed unanimously. PRESENTATION BY AD HOC COMMUNICATIONS TASK FORCE Mayor Paulson introduced Dr. Fred Capshaw, President of North Hennepin Community College, and chairperson of Brooklyn Center's Ad Hoc Communications Task Force. Dr. Capshaw advised the Council he and the six task force members, Joel Andrewjeski, Jody Brandvold, Patricia Keehr, Gale Tollin, Susan Warner, and Mike Miller, have met three times to date. He stated they have drafted a preliminary report outlining the goals /purpose of the Task Force which is to assist Brooklyn Center in advancing communication between the City and its residents and work force based on the City's goals for information, involvement and identity. Dr. Capshaw reviewed each portion of the draft outline dated January 15, 1992, as contained in the Council members' agenda packets, and recommended the task force proceed with developing a communications plan based on these goals if approved by the City Council. Dr. Capshaw advised the Council members the Task Force is looking for a response to the outline and for some direction as to where the Council members felt the first and strongest emphasis should be placed. Dr. Capshaw advised the Council the Task Force unanimously supported broadcasting City Council meetings on cable television, and recommended starting with minimal expenditures and gradually improving the programming. Dr. Capshaw further recommended a full time communications position be created to market Brooklyn Center. He felt the Task Force should be involved in developing the job description for this position based on the communications plan. 1/27/92 -5 - Councilmember Cohen thanked Dr. Capshaw for chairing the Task Force and for the presentation, and recommended the Task Force consider holding a public information meeting to obtain input from the residents at this point. The Task Force and Council could then incorporate the information obtained at that public information meeting into the communications plan. In response, Dr. Capshaw supported the idea of holding a public information meeting; however, he indicated the Task Force is really looking for some input /direction from Council at this point. Councilmember Cohen requested that citizens have an opportunity to review the outline prior to the Task Force moving ahead with the plan. Councilmember Pedlar commended Dr. Capshaw for the fine work he and the other Task Force members have done to date and asked if they had discussed prioritizing the goals. Dr. Capshaw said they had not; and emphasized the Task Force's desire for direction from the City Council. Councilmember Scott expressed appreciation for the work of the Task Force and stated she felt the three portions of the outline -- information, involvement and identity -- are equally important, and need to be addressed simultaneously in order to be effective. She suggested each Council member formulate his/her thoughts on the outline, and provide them to the City Manager who in turn can provide them to the Task Force prior to its next meeting. Councilmember Rosene also thanked Dr. Capshaw for his involvement. He felt Brooklyn Center has a lot to offer, and a lot of the City's residents are not aware of what is available to them. He expressed support of both the outline as presented and the creation of a full time communications position. He felt the City is certainly heading in the right direction in maximizing communication to its residents. Dr. Capshaw expressed enthusiasm in developing and implementing the communications plan to attract residents and jobs; to maintain property values; and to promote economic development. The plan also includes the development and implementation of a promotional campaign with a City slogan and logo to instill a positive image when people hear "Brooklyn Center." The Mayor stated he had reviewed minutes from the Communications Task Force meetings, and expressed appreciation that members of this Task Force, as well as members of all the City's commissions, are clearly advocates of the respective commission's purpose /function. Dr. Capshaw stated the communications plan should make Brooklyn Center an attractive place in which to live and do business, which in turn should increase revenues for the City. Councilmember Pedlar stated he was attracted to the "identity" portion of the outline as a priority because there are so many good things to promote in Brooklyn Center. He said when he sees "For Sale" signs on homes in the City he wonders why residents are moving. He hopes they are simply taking advantage of the current low interest rates and relocating 1/27/92 - 6 - within Brooklyn Center; but he is concerned with media portrayal of Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park as being high -crime areas. He has heard residents have left the community for that reason. He felt it would definitely be advantageous if the City could somehow verify why residents move from Brooklyn Center. In response, Dr. Capshaw stated a successful communications campaign can send good messages to residents and can counteract negative media reports. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Scott accepting the preliminary report of the Ad Hoc Communications Task Force. The motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING -- BROADCASTING OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ON CABLE TELEVISION The City Manager advised the Council a public hearing had been scheduled to receive comments on a proposal to broadcast City Council meetings on cable television. A notice of the public hearing had been sent to all City advisory commissioners; the Northwest News and the Brooklyn Center Sun Post were asked to publicize the hearing. A notice had also been posted on cable television channel 37. He stated Mr. Dave Kiser of Northwest Community Television was present at the meeting to answer any questions. The City Manager presented the staff report, and reviewed the five lighting options as contained in the report. Staff and Council members discussed the five lighting options, as well as the possibility and likelihood of moving the Council Chambers to free up the existing space for much - needed office space in City Hall. It was agreed that if the Council agrees to move ahead with cablecasting, the most effective lighting option would be the interim lighting as detailed in option #2. Councilmember Pedlar expressed support of cablecasting the Council meetings, and suggested viewing some programming for quality before making any concrete decisions on lighting. Councilmember Cohen asked about a sum of money that had been provided to each metropolitan municipality by the Cable Commission to promote the cablecasting of city council meetings. In response, the City Manager stated the amount was $218,000, and it is in an interest- earning account. He added that while the Cable Commission provided the money to promote cablecasting, the cities were not legally required to spend it for that purpose. Brooklyn Center had purchased a new Counicl Chambers sound system with a portion of the funds. Councilmember Cohen also supported cablecasting Council meetings, and stated the importance of getting accurate information to residents is critical given the fact that elected officials are often misquoted in the media. He requested the Mayor open the public hearing to obtain input from residents on this matter. 1/27/92 - 7 - Mayor Paulson opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing regarding broadcasting of City Council meetings on cable television at 8:05 p.m. He inquired if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council. KRISTIN MANN, 5415 EAST TWIN LAKE BOULEVARD Ms. Mann recalled the issue of cablecasting Council meetings had been brought up a couple of years ago, and she stated she was pleased to learn the Council was once again considering cablecasting. She recommended airing surrounding communities' Council meetings, as residents can obtain useful information from those meetings as well as from Brooklyn Center Council meetings. She stated she would like to see the City Council meetings of Robbinsdale, Maple Grove, Plymouth and Golden Valley. Councilmember Rosene asked if there were any detriments to airing other communities' meetings. The City Manager said the only detriment is that it cuts into airing time of other local programming; and consequently, local program scheduling has to be worked out with the cable channel. The Personnel Coordinator advised the Council the Communications Task Force will be addressing the issue of program scheduling with Northwest Community Television. Councilmember Rosene felt it would be beneficial for residents to see neighboring communities programming as well and felt it was a matter that could best be determined by residents. DIANE LERBS, 5107 EAST TWIN LAKE BOULEVARD Ms. Lerbs supported cablecasting Council meetings. She stated it would provide an excellent and convenient way in which residents can learn about issues the City Council is addressing. She said it is often difficult to get out at night, and cablecasting the meetings would be an excellent service to residents. The City Manager briefly discussed labor costs for camera operators and a director, as well as a supervisor for the first two or three meetings. The estimated annual cost for these services provided by Northwest Community Television based on twenty-four four -hour Council meetings is $2,100. DON POSS, 3212 - 65TH AVENUE NORTH Mr. Poss, city manager of the City of Blaine, advised the Council he had learned of the public hearing in the local press and wanted to share his cablecasting experience with the Council. The City of Blaine has been cablecasting its Council meetings for three years. He became acquainted with cablecasting when he attended his first Blaine City Council meeting as city manager. He learned at that meeting that an individual was and had been recording the proceedings on a camcorder, taking the film back to the studio, editing it, and airing it in the edited version hour after hour on the cable system in Blaine. After a couple of months it became clear a small group of residents was interested in seeing the Council meetings cablecast, and he persuaded the Council to do so. He felt cablecasting has greatly 1/27/92 7 - 8 - enhanced the structure and reputation of the Council. The feedback has been very positive; residents have observed a hardworking group of officials in a professional, well run meeting environment. He felt cablecasting the Brooklyn Center City Council meetings would easily promote the pride and positive identity Brooklyn Center is so worthy of. Mr. Poss concluded his address by stating Blaine began with simple fluorescent lighting above the Council members, and it works very well. He invited the Brooklyn Center City Council members to visit the Blaine City Council Chambers. RON CHRISTENSEN 6101 JUNE AVENUE NORTH Mr. Christensen supported cablecasting. He felt it would: 1) keep the Council focused on the issue at hand; 2) prevent one member from putting a consensus on the entire group because viewers could see for themselves any differences of opinion and voting on motions; 3) eliminate misquoting of Council members in the media; and 4) increase resident interest in city government. JOSEPH MANN, 5415 EAST TWIN LAKE BOULEVARD Mr. Mann supported cablecasting both the Brooklyn Center City Council meetings and neighboring communities' council meetings. He asked about the need to purchase recording equipment. The City Manager advised Mr. Mann the City does have the necessary recording equipment. BERNARD ACKERSON 53RD AND FRANCE AVENUES Mr. Ackerson asked if the Council meetings would be broadcast live or taped and aired at a later date. The City Manager briefly discussed the different broadcasting possibilities, and stated the meetings would most likely be broadcast both live and then repeated a few times throughout the week. Mr. Ackerson recommended an improved sound system be installed in the Council Chambers as he had trouble hearing and understanding the Council this evening. DAN REIVA, 1707 AMY LANE Mr. Reiva advised the Council he had spoken with Mayor Paulson about advanced broadcasting technologies. The City of Bloomington, for example, has an interactive technology system wherein residents can phone in and order just the information they want to see. At some point in the near future, residents will also be able to order video tapes of just the information they are interested in. He stated the advantage to this type of technology is that the City could easily track the types of information people are interested in having. In response to Councilmember Cohen's question as to the cost of such technology, Mr. Reiva stated it would cost approximately $10,000 to set up a good cablecasting system in the existing Council Chambers. The advanced type of interactive technology used in Bloomington would cost between $25,000 and $30,000. 1/27/92 - 9 - Councilmember Rosene suggested the new communications staff person could certainly respond to phone calls received during Council meetings if the Council would choose to offer that type of opportunity to its residents. Councilmember Cohen expressed continued support of cablecasting and stated that even if only 100 to 200 people tune in and those people in turn each talk to five more people about a City issue, the City would certainly be making communications progress. He asked the City Manager to check into the possibility of providing an incentive or subsidy for residents to hook up to the cable system to make it affordable to more residents. EDWARD NOBLE, 5117 XERXES AVENUE NORTH Mr. Noble felt cable television is not affordable for most senior citizens. He then made some offensive statements on the various races of citizens. Councilmember Cohen took exception to Mr. Noble's statements and asked the Mayor to entertain a motion to close the public hearing immediately. There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Scott to close the public hearing at 9 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Paulson recommended the Council recommend to the Ad Hoc Communications Task Force the City begin immediately to cablecast City Council meetings. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar directing staff to proceed with plans to cablecast City Council meetings beginning with the February 10, 1992, meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Rosene suggested the Council members coordinate a time to visit the council chambers in Blaine, New Hope and Golden Valley as a group. He further recommended taking along a video camera to record the chambers for others to view. Following a brief discussion on staff needs to cablecast the meetings, there was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Rosene to direct staff to enter into negotiations with Northwest Cable Company to provide staff to cablecast the Council meetings. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Paulson expressed the gratification he felt in seeing the Council members work so well together on this issue. RECESS The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 9:10 p.m. and reconvened at 9:33 p.m. LETTER FROM BARB SEXTON, PRESIDENT OF THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS Mayor Paulson read a letter he had received from Barb Sexton, President of the League of Women Voters expressing support of Cable Casting Brooklyn Center Council meetings. COUNCIL REPRESENTATION AT FUND- RAISING EVENTS Mayor Paulson suggested the Council members consider a policy on City epresentation at fund - Y raising events. He recommended the Council discuss it at a future meeting. 1/27/92 - 10- RESOLUTION HONORING MOLLY MALECKI CHAIR OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Mayor Paulson advised the Council the Planning Commission is planning a reception honoring Molly Malecki's years of service on the Planning Commission. After having served many years as a member of the Planning Commission, and having served as chair for the past three years, Molly has decided to give up her service. The reception will be Thursday, January 30 following the Planning Commission meeting which begins at 7:30 p.m. Mayor Paulson felt it would certainly be great if the Council members could attend. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -20 Member Phil Cohen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICTED PUBLIC SERVICE OF MOLLY MALECKI The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dave Rosene. The motion passed unanimously. ORDINANCES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES TO REQUIRE A MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN CERTAIN EARLY MORNING /24 HOUR COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS AND SINGLE - FAMILY AND TWO- FAMILY DWELLINGS IN R1 AND R2 ZONING DISTRICTS The City Manager presented An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances to Require a Minimum Separation between Certain Early Morning/24 Hour Commercial Operations and Single - Family and Two - Family Dwellings in R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts for a first reading. The Council had discussed amending this ordinance at its January 13, 1992, meeting; and the ordinance amendment reflects the Council's discussion from that meeting. Councilmember Cohen requested that a copy of the ordinance amendment be sent to the new executive director of the Brooklyn Center Chamber of Chamber. The Director of Planning and Inspection reviewed the eight points in the amendment on which the Council had provided direction. The City Attorney stated the ordinance clearly states businesses that are affected by this are made nonconforming only with respect to their hours of operation. The businesses may expand in physical size and operation, but they cannot expand their hours of operation into the prohibited hours. - - 1/27/92 11 The Director of Planning and Inspection presented an overhead transparency and reviewed the properties and businesses that will be affected by the amendment. He advised the Council public hearing notices will be sent to all affected property owners and businesses, as well as to the Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce. Councilmember Cohen requested maps highlighting the affected properties and businesses be sent along with the public hearing notices. The Director of Planning and Inspection agreed to this request. There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Cohen to approve for first reading An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances to Require a Minimum Separation between Certain Early Morning/24 Hour Operations and Single - Family and Two - Family Dwellings in R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts and setting a public hearing date of February 5, 1992, at 7:15 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. REQUEST FROM AMERICAN LITTLE LEAGUE FOR USE OF LAND IN GARDEN CITY PARK The City Manager presented a request from American Little League for use of land at the south end of Garden City Park as an additional Little League playing field. The request was initially made by Mr. Les Thurs, President of the American Little League, at the November Parks and Recreation Commission. The land they are requesting is currently a soccer /football field which is used very little, if at all. One of the fields the league owns repeatedly flood throughout the baseball season. In addition, a third field is leased from Brookdale Christian Center Assembly of God Church and could be lost at anytime. 0 The City Manager presented an aerial map of the area, and recommended scheduling a neighborhood meeting to discuss the matter, as he anticipates objection from neighboring residents from past experiences. Councilmember Scott stated that when the third field was added the neighbors were concerned about traffic, parking, and noise. She strongly recommended the Park and Recreation Commission hold a neighborhood meeting to address these types of concerns. The City Manager passed around some photographs of the flooded fields, and the Council members agreed there is a definite need for more adequate playing fields for the American Little League. Mayor Paulson invited Mr. Les Thurs, President of the American Little League, to address the Council. Mr. Thurs presented statistics of the American Little League. He stated it has grown from 26 teams to 40 teams over the last eight years. Over 600 games have to be scheduled and played within the three -month summer period; three reliable fields are essential. 1/27/92 - 12- Mr. Thurs stated the American Little League intends to fully build and pay for the field; there will be no cost to Brooklyn Center. The Council and Mr. Thurs discussed the deteriorating condition of the soil in the area, and the long -range plans of the American Little League. In response to the Mayor's question as to whether or not the requested land space is also sinking, the City Manager stated that while it is further above the flood plain, sinking is certainly possible. Mr. Thurs stated they will basically be moving from the ball field /playing area from the southern portion of the park area to the northern portion of the park area which is actually further away from the neighboring homes. The Mayor invited Roxanne Bridges, 6712 Emerson Avenue, to address the Council. Mrs. Bridges strongly supported the American Little League's request for use of the additional land space to provide improved playing conditions for the teams. She did, however, request the City Council include in the lease agreement some type of stipulation that the girls' program be continued, rather than be divided up as has been discussed by the League. The City Attorney stated a provision could be included in the lease agreement on a complaint basis, whereby the provision would only be enforced if the City received complaints on the matter. In response to Mrs. Bridges' concerns and comments, Mr. Thurs stated the American Little League does not intend to eliminate any of the girls program. They would like to form another charter and then request to play inter - league. Presently, girls from the National League area in the southern part of the City are playing in the American League because they do not have the room to add a National League girls' program. The American Little League plans to form another charter from the National Little League and then apply for inter - league play. The Council members discussed this request, and agreed to support it. Following a brief discussion on ensuring both the boys' and girls' programs are improved equally, Councilmembers Pedlar and Cohen reminded the Council the issue before the Council a request for use of City park land, rather than ensuring equal time for boys and girls. The law clearly states there shall be equal opportunities for boys and girls; it would not have to be written into a lease agreement. There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Cohen recommending the Park and Recreation Commission hold a public hearing for the purpose of obtaining citizen response to the American Little League's request for use of land in Garden City Park as a baseball field. The motion passed unanimously. 1/27/92 - 13 - DISCUSSION ITEMS SELECTION COMMITTEE REPORT REGARDING PROCUREMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN The City Manager presented a Resolution Accepting the Report of the Selection Committee for Procurement of Engineering Services for the Development of a Water Management Plan and Approving Execution of a Contract for Said Services with Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. The development of Brooklyn Center's Water Management Plan was formally initiated at the Council meeting of November 18, 1991, by adoption of Resolution No. 91 -265. The Director of Public Works advised the Council the selection committee consisted of himself; William Monk, Crystal City Engineer; and Charles Lenthe, Blaine City Engineer. Brooklyn Center Engineer Mark Maloney also served as a non - voting member. He then reviewed the selection committee's selection process. The Selection Committee had received six proposals in response to the RFP; reviewed them all; narrowed them down to three; interviewed the final three; and then selected Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. The Director of Public Works reviewed the proposal rating summary used in the process as well as the consultant evaluation form. The Director of Public Works reviewed the two areas of cost -- Phase I includes data collection /inventory, problem identification, priority ranking of problem areas, and scoping of Phase II work. Phase II would then consist of detailed planning and cost analysis to resolve problems, according to the previously adopted priority list. This proposed contract with Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc, is for Phase I only. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., have estimated Phase I services not to exceed $83,818; and Phase II is estimated at approximately $60,000 for a total of $143,818, well within the City's $150,000 estimate and budgeted amount for this project. Mayor Paulson asked for a comparison of the estimated dollar figures of the other bidders. In response, the Director of Public Works said the selection committee's recommendation is based not only on cost, but the contents of the study. Of the three firms interviewed for Phase I, the lowest estimate was approximately $70,500; second was $76,000; and Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., was third at $83,000. He also pointed out that while higher on Phase I, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., was lower on Phase II, so there was a bit of a crossover. The selection committee felt that one of the reasons that the cost of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., was high was the fact that they proposed a very high level of citizen participation and involvement in the development of this study compared to the other firms. If the cost of citizen participation would be taken out of the proposed cost, it would be similar to the other firms. 1/27/92 - 14- In response to Mayor Paulson's request for the differences between the content of the three proposals, the Director of Public Works stated the City's RFP had required at least two public information meetings. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., had included those two public information meetings, plus the mailing of a questionnaire to every resident in the City. The study also included formation of a task force which would include resident members. Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., also included in its proposal a review of the study with other engineers to get independent opinions. In addition, they will prepare monthly articles for the City newsletter. The Director of Public Works stated Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., was very heavy on the city involvement. In addition, the selection committee felt the firm is very well qualified from a technical standpoint. Councilmember Pedlar stressed the need to use in house resources. He felt there were several areas included in the proposal where in house staff could be used. In response, the Director of Public Works stated he certainly plans to use City staff for some of the work, and there is a contingency in the draft Professional Services Agreement between the City and Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., addressing this issue. The project engineers from Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., Mr. Robert Schunicht, Principal in Charge of the Project, and Ismael Martinez, the Project Manager, presented an overview of their proposal. Mr. Martinez felt state -of- the -art water planning processes inspire community commitment to quality water resources. He advised the Council the proposed plan has been tailor designed to meet the needs of Brooklyn Center, and includes; 1) citizen involvement; 2) balancing redevelopment issues which results in proactive water quality planning; 3) experienced planning approach which assures implementation is affordable; and 4) detailed reports and review which results in a valuable community management tool. In addition, peer review enhances the quality of the plan; and maintenance oriented solutions are the key to successful plan implementation. Councilmember Cohen asked how the plan interfaces within the Shingle Creek Watershed District and how it works with other communities. In response the Director of Public works stated every city is required by State law to develop a local water management plan by approximately July 1, 1993. The Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) has determined what must be contained in each of the local plans. Compliance with the BWSR requirements and Shingle Creek and West Hennepin Water Management Plans and Guidelines is a provision of the proposed contract. Mayor Paulson felt the plan was very well presented, but appeared to be above and beyond what is required. He questioned where the plan is on the City's list of priorities, and he felt $83,000 for a written report seemed excessive. He felt consideration should be given to the least expensive proposal. 1/27/92 - 15- I In response, the Director of Public Works said he, staff and the other members of the selection committee felt the recommendation to go with Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., ensures a good workable plan that will be technically correct. The bottom line is going to indicate the need for spending millions of dollars for needed improvements, and the City needs the best possible report as to what the costs of construction are going to be. Councilmember Cohen supported the recommendation, but recommended the proposed resolution authorizing the project be amended to include the maximum dollar amount of Phase I to be $83,818. Councilmember Rosene expressed support of the proposal, and stated that while he appreciates frugality, he felt the City would be better off to have the best plan available. Councilmember Scott supported the recommendation, and stated several times over the years the City has gone with the lowest bidder only to end up with worthless reports, most of which were not even understandable. She felt confident going with Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -21 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption subject to being amended to include the maximum dollar amount of the Phase I contract amount to be $83,818. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE REPORT OF THE SELECTION COMMITTEE FOR PROCUREMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AND APPROVING EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT FOR SAID SERVICES WITH BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Phil Cohen. The motion passed unanimously. AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING TREES The City Manager presented An Ordinance Adding Chapter 20 of the City Ordinances Regarding Trees for a first reading, and advised the Council the ordinance had been revised as requested by the Council at its January 13, 1992, meeting. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to approve for first reading An Ordinance Adding Chapter 20 of the City Ordinances Regarding Trees and setting a public hearing date of February 5, 1992, at 7:15 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. 1/27/92 - 16- I RFP FOR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION STUDY The City Manager presented a Request for Proposals for a Compensation Study of Executive Positions. Councilmember Pedlar reviewed the RFP and pointed out the original RFP dated January 13, 1992, was included in the agenda packets as well as a revision dated January 27, 1992, which includes clarification of item A in the Compensation Study Objectives section of the RFP; the addition of job descriptions as an item in B in the Scope of Work section; and the addition of a new item D.4 in the same section. In addition, he stated item B under Compensation Study Objectives on page one should be amended to read: "To obtain detailed metro region market data and compare it to the City of Brooklyn Center data." Item D -5 under Scope of Work on page two should be amended to read: "Make both a written report and oral report to the city council of your findings." Councilmember Pedlar stated the RFP as presented would provide the City an opportunity to develop good salary ranges for both good qualified incumbents and candidates to ensure the City will be paying them an adequate salary that meets the standards of the region. He asked for the Council's consideration of the RFP as presented. He stated he had spoken with Mr. Don Poss, who is the city manager at Blaine who supported the executive compensation study. Councilmember Cohen expressed thanks to Councilmember Pedlar for his work on this request for proposal and for getting it all sorted out. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Scott authorizing the Request for Proposal for a Compensation Study of Executive Positions dated January 27, 1992, and as amended by Councilmember Pedlar. Mayor Paulson also expressed appreciation to Councilmember Pedlar for working on the RFP. He, however, felt the Stanton Study had plenty of information in it with which to make an evaluation of the executive positions. He expressed the need to first determine policy before setting salary ranges. He felt spending money while trying to save money is counter productive, and he said he would oppose the motion. The motion passed with Mayor Paulson opposed. ADMINISTRATIVE TRAFFIC COMMITTEE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PERSONAL INJURY LAWSUIT RELATING TO ACCIDENT AT BUS STOP The City Manager presented the recommendation of the Administrative Traffic Committee regarding a personal injury lawsuit relating to an accident at an MTC bus stop in June of 1988. He advised the Council members the City's attorneys sought and obtained an out -of- court settlement with the plaintiff. He advised the Council the Administrative Traffic Committee has reviewed the City's policies regarding siting of MTC bus stops, and recommends that a policy change be made to reduce the City's liability should future accidents occur. 1/27/92 - 17- The City Manager stated the logical response following this incident is for the City to come to a liability agreement with the MTC to eliminate the City from being exposed to this type of liability. In the event an agreement with the MTC is not attainable, he recommended the Council consider removing the MTC signs posted within the City to eliminate the liability risk associated with them. Councilmember Scott asked how other communities handle this matter. In response, the City Manager stated he had not spoken with other communities, as he preferred to meet with the MTC prior to making it a metro wide issue. Councilmember Pedlar asked if there are similar liability risks /situations the City should be concerned with and obtain hold harmless agreements. In response, the City Manager said staff is presently looking into this issue. The Director of Public Works advised the Council this is the only situation wherein the City has installed a sign at the request of another agency. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar directing staff to work with the MTC to further define options and come to a mutually acceptable agreement. The Mayor expressed dismay in the City's response to this incident, and stated he felt the City had been negligent in this case as it had clearly been given the responsibility of posting the sign. He felt at issue here, once again, is the manner in which the City responds to matters as they arise; and rather than focusing on this particular incident, staff should thoroughly review and improve the City's policy of responding to issues. He felt policies need to be developed to thoroughly address both sides of issues. He stated he would oppose the motion, and he encouraged the Council to do the same. The City Manager stated this matter goes back quite some time; and it was in response to a specific request from the MTC. The MTC had just taken over the transit system and was changing over all the signs to MTC. The City did not site the location of the sign, it merely posted the sign on a County road as requested by the MTC. Councilmembers Pedlar and Scott withdrew their motion and second respectively, and a lengthy discussion ensued on how to adequately and properly address this matter. Mayor Paulson recommended a more positive approach of determining with the MTC what criteria make a bus stop safe, and then examining the safety at each existing site. Councilmember Pedlar questioned the City's safety expertise to make such determinations, and felt a better approach would be to eliminate or minimize the City's exposure by requiring the MTC to hold Brooklyn Center harmless. 1/27/92 - 18 - In response, the City Attorney stated the Court of Appeals had already determined the City undertook a duty to put the sign in a safe place, and the City has now learned it can be responsible for this type of decision. Councilmember Cohen reminded the Council this is actually a risk management issue. He felt the staff recommendation was a responsible action; and suggested the Mayor become involved in working it out with the MTC. Mayor Paulson felt it would be in the City's best interest to retain the responsibility of posting signs. He felt it is a City problem, and he was disappointed the City was foisting it off on another agency. He suggested if the City truly felt it is not a City responsibility, the matter should be brought to court rather than settled. The City Attorney stated the Court of Appeals had already made the decision that as long as the City continues to post signs, it does have a duty of reasonable care. In response to Councilmember Rosene's suggestion to take it to the Supreme Court, the City Attorney stated that had already been done. The Supreme Court had concluded the Court of Appeals was correct. When the City participates in the placement of this kind of sign they take up a duty to exercise a certain level of care in doing that duty. In this particular case, the City stepped in where it wasn't legally obligated to do so, but in doing so it took up a duty of care. Councilmember Rosene suggested proposing new legislation addressing the duty of care issue. The City Attorney said under Minnesota Statutes the State has given immunity in certain cases. There are still some categories; such as snow and ice removal, where the Legislature recognizes that the municipality continues to be immune. There is a short list of eight or nine categories where sovereign immunity continues; however, he felt it would be a long shot that posting signs would fit into one of those categories. The Mayor again suggested the City examine both its policy and the safety of the existing bus stops within Brooklyn Center. In response, Councilmember Cohen asked if the Mayor was suggesting a traffic safety expert be hired. The City Attorney stated even a traffic expert could not guarantee the City would not be sued. Following additional discussion on drafting a mutually acceptable motion, there was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Cohen directing the Mayor, City Manager and the City's Legal Counsel to meet with the MTC to discuss and resolve this issue, keeping in mind the need to eliminate the City's exposure to liability. The motion passed unanimously. 41 1/27/92 - 19- LEGISLATIVE UPDATE The City Manager presented the Legislative Update for discussion. Councilmember Cohen briefly reviewed the proposed legislative update materials as contained in the Council members' agenda packets, and recommended the Council consider a resolution accepting the legislative update at the next Council meeting so it can be presented to the legislative delegation by the end of February at the latest. The City Manager advised the Council staff is in the process of setting up a meeting with Representative Carruthers and Senator Luther to go over the legislative update; and the Council will be advised of the date, time and location as soon as it is arranged so Council members may plan to attend if they so desire. RESOLUTION APPROVING PAY EQUITY IMPLEMENTATION REPORT Councilmember Cohen withdrew his request to have agenda item 13 -a, a Resolution Approving Pay Equity Implementation Report, removed from the consent agenda, and requested it be brought back to the Council as a discussion item after it is adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -22 Member Phil Cohen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PAY EQUITY IMPLEMENTATION REPORT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR 69TH AVENUE PHASE II IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -10 CONTRACT NO. 1992 -B AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS The City Manager presented a Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications for 69th Avenue Phase II Improvement Project No. 1990 -10, Contract No. 1992 -13, and Directing Advertisement for Bids. He advised the Council Short - Elliott- Hendrickson, Inc., had completed preparation of plans and specifications for improvements to 69th Avenue between Brooklyn Boulevard and West Palmer Lake Drive; however, staff had requested the resolution approving the plans be removed from the consent agenda because of the recent development of a crack near the centerline of the surcharge area through Palmer Lake. The Director of Public Works distributed a memo to the City Manager and Council members outlining this development. He reviewed the memo in detail, and advised the Council that based on discussions and recommendations of the consultants (STS and SEH, Inc.) and staff, he recommended Council consider the resolution authorizing the plans and specifications so staff can proceed. He will keep the Council informed as information becomes available. 1/27/92 -20- r Councilmember Scott asked if the surcharge area had settled gradually as it should have, would it have settled as much as two feet. The Director of Public Works stated it would have settled a lot more. Councilmember Rosene recommended moving ahead as planned as he didn't feel the soil problem should prevent the City from getting started on the improvement project between West Palmer Lake Drive and Brooklyn Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -23 Member Dave Rosene introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR 69TH AVENUE PHASE II IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -10, CONTRACT NO. 1992 -13, AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott. The motion passed unanimously. RETIREMENT OF BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE CHIEF JIM LINDSAY The City Manager read a letter he had received from Police Chief Jim Lindsay announcing his plan to retire from service effective September 12, 1992; his last day of work will be September 11, 1992. Copies of the letter were distributed to the Council members. The City Manager stated that while retirement will certainly be a wonderful experience /opportunity for Mr. Lindsay, he will certainly be missed. The City Manager advised the Council the early notice will provide the staff and Council a good deal of time to hire a qualified replacement. He has asked the Personnel Coordinator to prepare a recommended plan for hiring a replacement, and staff will review the recommended plan with the Council to allow for timely execution of the replacement/hiring process. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene, and seconded by Mayor Paulson to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 12 :35 a.m. Deputy City Clerk Todd Paulson, Mayor Recorded and transcribed by: Peggy McNabb Northern Counties Secretarial Service 1/27/92 - 21 - MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTLK IN THE COUNTY OF H NINEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION FEBRUARY 10, 1992 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Todd Paulson at 7 p,m, RQLL CALL Mayor Todd Paulson, Councilmembers Celia Scott, Jerry Pedlar, Dave Rosene, and Philip Cohen. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Planning and Inspection Ron Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, Personnel Coordinator Geralyn Barone, and Council Secretary Peggy McNabb, OPENING CEREMONIES The Council and staff observed a few moments of silence and self - reflection. OPEN FORUM Mayor Paulson noted the Council had received one request to use the open forum session this evening and invited Diane Johnson to address the Council. DIANE JOHNSON, RESIDENT OF BROOKLYN CENTER Ms. Johnson advised the Council she had attended a Council meeting back in September of 1991 and expressed her concern over the proposed waterslide. In response, the City Manager had sent her a 100 -page packet of information in January which supposedly provided h r _ ded t e basis for the C',ouncr] s approval of the waterslide construction. She stated that P pp at while her questions last September were from a lap - swimmer's point of view, tonight's questions were from a taxpayer's point of view. She felt both the constr4lction figures in the budget as well as the projected revenues were totally unrealistic and highly unlikely. She then asked each Council member who voted for approval of the waterslide to state on what he or she based that decision. Mayor Paulson suggested a copy of the minutes of the Council meetings would provide each Council member's position on the waterslide, and another good way to address specific issues would be to contact Council members individually. Y 2/10/92 - 1 - Mayor Paulson also recalled an agreement had been reached �' eac ed with staff to have lap Swimming lanes open and available at all times the pool is open, in response, Ms. Johnsoo state she had been dea cling unsuccessfully with staff on that issue for the ast five p Y ears. She questioned why the Council and staff would address the issue now, when the waterslide has been approved, but would not address it over the past five years, Mayor Paulson then asked if any of the Council members would like to offer a response to Ms. Johnson' request. Councilmember Cohen stated his support of the waterslide was based on research and figures presented by staff. He expressed confidence In the staff reports and projections and stated he would continue to support the waterslide. The City Manager stated the figures in the projected revenue report had been carefully prepared and had gone through a number of review processes. He said staff would continue to stand by those projected figures as being attainable. Councilmember Pedlar stated approval of the waterslide had not been a hasty decision for the Council. The swimming pool had not been self supporting for many years, and the Council had to respond to that by either increasing revenues to cover the operating costs or close the pool. He stated it was important to him that residents continue to have use of the swimming pool, and waterslides historically do generate revenue. He also continued to support his approval of the waterslide. 0 Ms. Johnson raised the issue of the current low usage of the pool, as well as competition with outdoor water -park facilities. In response, Mayor Paulson stated he had been to the Shoreview Community Center and had observed very high usage by families. He emphasized "family usage" and felt communi swimming pools and waterslides provide an excellent, much needed form of both recreation and exercise. Mayor Paulson acknowledged Boy Scout Troop #154 from Hope Lutheran Church in the audience. He asked for a show of hands as to how many scouts had used the Brooklyn Center Community Swimming Pool in the past month. One scout responded. He then asked how many thought they would try the waterslide during the summer months. The response was unanimous; each scout raised his hand. in closing, the Mayor stated the Council had gone through the process carefully with the Park and Recreation Commission, City staff, as well as with citizen input; and would continue to support the waterslide, He thanked Ms. Johnson and invited her to address the Council anytime again or to contact Council members individually. 2/10/92 -2- Ms. Johnson felt the Brooklyn Center City Council needs to look at all perspectives of issues it addresses, every angle needs to be looked at and fully considered before decisions are made. The Mayor inquired if there was anyone else present who wished to address the Council. There being none, he continued with the regular agenda items. QQ UNCIL REPORTS BOY SCOUT TROOP #154 Mayor 1Paul5on again acknowledged Boy Scout Troop #154 from Hope Lutheran Church, and thanked the scouts for participating in the waterslide issue during open forum. CABLE CASTING THE MEETING Mayor Paulson stated this was the first Council meeting to be cable cast live and welcomed the cable audience. He asked that Council, staff, and citizen remarks and positions be kept brief and to the point this evening, to provide an opportunity for everyone to be heard and to keep things both interesting and moving along. SIATE OF THE CITY MEETING The Mayor advised the Council that on March 19, at 12 noon, at the Brooklyn Center Holiday Inn, an annual state of the city meeting will be held with the Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce. The Mayor will be scheduling some additional meetings around that rime to get moving on some of the things the Council has been talking about, i.e., a vision of the City, housing, commercial development, and citizen participation. He stated there are specific goals and agenda items he wants to place forward in that manner. He asked the Council members to mark their calendars and to contact him with anything they would like incorporated into those meetings. The Mayor will check into having media coverage of the state of the city meeting with the local newspapers and cable television, BROOKLYN CENTER HOCKEY ASSOCIATION Councilmembcr Pcdlar asked that the recent request from the Brooklyn Center Hockey Association for financial assistance be put on the next Council agenda to be considered and finalized. NATIONAL MIDDLE LEVEL EDUCATION WEEK Councilmember Scott thanked the City Manager and Council for including a proclamation of the week of March 15 through 21, 1992, as Middle Level Education Week on the Council agenda. She noted the high amount of media coverage and the emphasis being placed on education from the presidential candidates, and stated education is finally becoming a forefront in our society. She acknowledged the changes taking place in the middle level of our school systems with junior high schools being changed to middle schools, and noted the importance of acknowledging the hard work of the educators in the Brooklyn Center community, She expressed appreciation in seeing the proclamation on the Council agenda. 2/10/92 -3- APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Paulson inquired if any Council members requested any items be removed from th consent agenda. Councilmember Cohen requested the minutes of the January 27, 1992 meeting be removed from the consent agenda. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar approving the agenda and consent agenda as amended. The motion passed unanimously. PROCLAMATION DECLARING MARCH 15-21,1992, AS NATIONAL MIDDLE LEVEL EDUCATION WEEK There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to approve a Proclamation Declaring March 15 -21, 1992, as National Middle Level Education Week, The motion passed unanimously, RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 92 -24 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR WELL NO.3 SAND REMOVAL, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1992 -05, CONTRACT 1992 -A I* The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Jerry Pedlar. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -25 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption; RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMEN'1' 1 ;UK 1310S, TRLJNK SEWER REPLACEMENT UNDER I- 94/694, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO, 1992 -03, CONTRACT 1992 -D The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ,Terry Pedlar, The motion passed unanimously, 2/10/92 -4- RESOTJ ITION NO 92 -26 Mcmbcr Celia Scott introduced tlic fullvwiuig rc6uluLiuia and moved its adoption; RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN APPROPRIATION FROM THE CAPITAL llN1YXQVI lMENTS FUND FOR THE CITY'S SHARD, OJ; THE UUS7' OF CONSTRUCTION OF A JOINT FACILITY FOR PETS UNDER POLICE SECURITY W.U.P.S.) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Jerry Pedlar, The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO, 92 -27 Member C-clia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED POLICE VEHICLE The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Jerry Pedlar. The motion passed unanimously. LICENSES There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to approve the following list of licenses: BULK VENDOR D & G Vending, Inc. 4313 NE Washington Street Vendall Bulk Vending Co, 1820 East 36th Street 9ASOLINE SERVICE STATION SuperAmerica #4160 6545 West River Road U.S. West 6540 Shingle Creek Parkway LODGING 1 TABLISHMENT Brookdale Motcl 6500 Lyndale Avenue N MECHANICAL SYSTEMS P & D Mechanical Contracting Co. 4629 - 41st Avenue N Palen/Kimball Company 550 Vandalia Street NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINES A,R.A Services 2830 N Fairview Avenuc Northwestern National Life 6200 Shingle Creek Parkway American Vending Company P,Q, Box 511 Sears Automotive Brookdale Bro- Midwest Vcnding CA)mpany 9110 Grand Avenue S 2/10/92 -5 - Duoos Bras. American Legion 4307 - 70th Avenue N Beacon Bowl 6525 Lyndale Avenue N Days Inn 1501 Freeway Blvd. Pilgrim Cleancrs 5748 Brooklyn Blvd. Brooklyn Center Service "76" 6145 Brooklyn Blvd. Consumer Vending 2714 East 33rd Street Target Stores 6701 Parkway Circle Earle Brown Bowl 6440 James Circle Thomas M. Hogan 2732 Xylon Avenue N General Litho Services, Inc. 6860 Shingle Creek Parkway HUB Vending, Inc. 6123 Aldrich Avenue N Johnson Controls 1801 - 67th Avenue N N.S.I, /Griswold Corporation 8300 - 10th Avenue N Lynbrook Bowl 6357 North Lilac Drive Travelers North 6601 Shingle Creek Parkway Northern States Power Co. 4501 - 68th Avenue N Twin Cities Vending Company, Inc. 1065 East Highway 36 Sears 1297 Brookdale Center PERISHABLE VENDING MACHINES A.R.A Services 2630 N Fairview Avenue Northwestern National Life 6200 Shingle Creek Parkway American Vending Company P Box 511 Sears Automotive Brookdale Bro- Midwest Vending Company 9110 Grand Avenue S Beacon Bawl 6525 Lyndale Avenue N Consumer Vending 2714 East 33rd Street Target Stores 6701 Parkway Circle C,D. Flodstrom 52UU - 77th Avenue N Firestone 5445 Xerxes Avenue N N.S.I. /Griswold Corporation 8300 - 10th Avenue N Travelers North 6601 Shingle Creek Parkway Twin Cities Vending Company, Inc, 1065 East Highway 36 Sears 1297 Brookdale Center RENTAL DWELLINGS Initial: Sherry Ward 6915 Indiana Avenue N Ivan and Hazel Vetterick 4810 - 65th Avenue N Renewal: Byron and Nancy Mach 4708 -12 Twin Lake Avenue 2/10/92 -6- SIGN HANGER Topline Outdoor Advertising, Inc. 1471 - 92nd Lane NE .5 PECIAT •• FOOD HANDLING ESTABLISHMENT Best Products Co,, Inc, 5925 Earle Brown Drive Gole's Gift Shop 2200 Freeway Blvd. M cat', S Drug Emporium 5900 Shingle Creek Parkway F & M Distributors 5951 Earle Brown Drive Fun Services 3615 - 50th Avenue N Gift Shop, Too 1501 Freeway Blvd. Kay -13ee Toy & Hobby 1320 Brookdale Center Main Street Video 68UU Humboldt Avenue N T.J. Maxi 5900 Shingle Creek Parkway Total Petroleum, Inc. 683U Brookyn Blvd. Toys "R" Us 5425 Xerxes Avenue N TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCT Jerry's NewMarket Broakdale 5801 Xerxes Avenue N APPROVAL OF MINUTES JANUARY 27. 1992 - REG LAR SESSION Following a brief discussion with the City Manager, there was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Rosene tabling approval of the January 27, 1992, minutes until comments from Mr, Edward Noble could be included on page ten prior to the closing of the public hearing. MAY RAL APPOINTMENTS PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Mayor Paulson introduced Mr. Charles Rickart, thanked him for his interest in the Park and Recreation Commission, and appointed him to serve on the Park and Recreation Commission. He appointed Barbara Kalligher and .fill Sherritt to the Planning Commission. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar approving the Mayoral appointments to the Park and Recreation Commission and Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously. The City Manager noted the Planning Commission is currently without a chair, as the chair has resigned and the vice -chair passed away in December. The DIrector of Planning and Inspection suggcsted the most senior member of the Commission be appointed interim chair until a recommendation can be made for a chair at the next Council meeting. The Mayor concurred. 2/10/92 -7- 7 .1_1 t,ir J•l r tV•_ _J -1 _ _ __ . \.11 /.) _L..LLlI i PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS PLANNING COMMISSION 4P LICATIONS NOS 92001 92002 AND 9200 E ILLIPS 60 C OWAN Y The City Manager presented Planning Commission Application Nos. 92001, 92002, and 92003 submitted by Phillips 66 Company. Planning Commission Application No. 92001 is a request for site and building plan and special use permit approval to construct an 1,831 square -foot gas station/convenience store n h si e /cax was o t he , . to vt the existing Union 76 station at 69U1 Brooklyn Boulevard. The application had been reviewed by the Planning Commission at its January 16 and January 30, 1992, meetings and denial was recommended through Planning Commission Resolution No. 92 -1. Planning Commission Application No. 92002 is a request for preliminary plat approval to redraw the boundary line between the service station site at 6901 Brooklyn Boulevard and the single family residence to the north. This application had been reviewed b 8 Y the Planning PP Y g Commission at its January 16 and Janu 0 1992 , meetings s and was rec ommended for ry � approval. Planning Commission Application No. 92003 is a request for variance approval from Section 35 -400 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow construction of a gas station/convenience store /car wash approximately 28' from Brooklyn Boulevard instead of the 50' required by ordinance from all major thoroughfares. This application had been reviewed by the Planning Commission at its January 16 and 30, 1992, meetings and denial was recommended through Planning Commission Resolution No. 92 -1. The City Manager recommended all three applications be discussed in conjunction with one another. The Director of Planning and Inspection advised the Council the minutes of the January 16 and January 30, 1992, Planning Commission meetings contained the Planning Commission's consideration of these applications, He presented a transparency of the site, which is on the northwest corner of Brooklyn Boulevard and 69th Avenue, It is in a C2 zoning district which allows gas stations, car washes and convenience stores as special uses. Public hearings would be required for both the special use permit and the variance request. The proposal is to demolish the existing building and construct a new gas station, convenience store and car wash on the site. The applicant has proposed to transfer a small triangle of land from the northwest corner of the existing service station to the site of a Cl zoned residence to the north, which would eliminate an R1 abutment nonconformance. The Director of Planning and Inspection reviewed the access /parking, landscaping, grading/drainage/utilitics, building, and lighting/trash proposals; and stated the applicant has either met or agreed to meet the City's requirements in these areas. 0 2/10/92 -8 - The Director of Planning and Inspection pointed out the main issue with these applications was the request for setback variance off of Brooklyn Boulevard, The Planning Commission did not believe the standards for variance were met in this case, and consequently recommended denial of the variance request. The Planning Commission's major finding was the standards for a variance had not been met on the following grounds: 1. The applicant has not demonstrated that it is economically infeasible to develop the property without a car wash and thereby meet the required setback,'. A gas station/ convenience store was developed approximately two years ago by another company at 66th Avenue N and Highway 252. 2. The circumstance of a shallow lot depth off Brooklyn Boulevard is not unique. Many, if not most, lots along Brooklyn Boulevard are of insufficient depth to accommodate certain types of commercial development. it is necessary to either fit the development to provide greater lot depth from Brooklyn Boulevard. 3. The hardship experienced by the applicant is self - imposed by the applicant's requirement to have a car wash as part of its development, 4. Granting a variance for this redevelopment project would set a precedent for other redevclopment in this area and all along Brooklyn Boulevard. If some relaxation of the setback along Brooklyn Boulevard is called for, it should be pursued with an ordinance amendment rather than with variance. The Director of Planning and Inspection stated that based on these four findings, Planning Commission Application o Nos, 92001 and 92003 were recommended for denial through Planning Commission Resolution No. 92 -1. The Director of Planning and Inspection stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Commission Application No. 9:002 which is the preliminary plat request. The transfer of the triangle of land to the neighboring site could be accomplished but approval should be sublcct to the following conditions; 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 3. The preliminary plat shall be revised, prior to consideration by the City Council, to indicate a dedication of right of way for future widening of 69th Avenue North of 18' in width, 21092 _ / / 9 - Public hearings have been scheduled for all three applications, and notices have been sent to surrounding property owners. Councilmember Cohen asked the Director of Planning and Inspection if there had been discussion at the Planning Commission meeting about looking at the ordinance as a whole rather than granting variances. In response, the Director of Planning and Inspection stated there was discussion of that nature at the Planning Commission meeting, as well as at a joint meeting with the Council, The Planning Commission, however, had not pursued that avenue with this application. He felt the Planning Commission would be looking for some direction from the City Council for changing the setback standards through an ordinance amendment. Councilmember Cohen asked whether it was the setback or the 18' dedication that was creating the problem with this application. The Director of Planning and Inspection felt it was the setback itself creating the problem, and the 18' dedication requirement simply moved the development 18' to the north, Councilmember Scott questioned the drainage design and specifically the need for a catch basin to prevent ice buildup on the roadway in the winter months. In response, the Director of Planning and Inspection stated that while the City Engineer had reviewed the plans, detailed discussion had not taken place yet, He felt the City Engineer will be recommending the site not drain directly off the driveway onto Brooklyn Boulevard, and will be recommending some type of catch basin to catch that water. Councilmember Scott asked if allowing a developer to get around a condition by dedicating a seetion of land and creating an outlot onto another piece of property would be setting a precedent. The Director of Planning and Inspection stated the 20' triangle would be transferred in a manner where it would not be considered an outlot. Councilmember Rosene asked to what extent the applicant had tried to acquire additional land, The Director of Planning and Inspection stated he believed there had been some discussions on the possible acquisition of properties to the west and the north over the past year, Councilmember Rosene asked how the neighboring residents felt about the development. The Director of Planning and Inspection stated only one neighbor further to the north had been at the Planning Commission meeting, so it was not known what the other neighboring residents felt. The Director of Planning and Inspection stated another thing to keep in mind and what may at least lead to some justification for this application is the guidelines in the City's comprehensive plan which does recommend an expansion of the general commerce or 2/10/92 - 10- C2 zoning district in the northwest quadrant of 69th Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard. He pointed out that entire triangular area has been recommended for redevelopment, so it is likely those residences may be removed from that area at Sometime. Councilmemher Rosene emphasized the need for proper drainage design to prevent ice buildup on the roadway, and also the need for the proposed fence to be acceptablc to the neighboring residents He further cautioned that an additional hazard may be created with water running off the cars as they pull out onto the roadway, The Director of Planning and Inspection stated the operators would certainly have to address those issues. The City Manager pointed out that purchasing the property to the north would not solve the abutment problem, and the major problem is the 50' setback requirement. He further stated modern car wash technology includes drying devices to eliminate water running off the cars. ,TAN BACCUS PHILLIPS 66 C7MPANy Mayor Paulson invited Ron Baccus, Phillips 66 Company, to address the Council. Mr. Baccus stated he had personally worked on the p y redevelopment of this site for the past one and tine -half years, He presented some drawings of the proposal, and briefly addressed the comments of the Council. He felt the plan does meet the setback requirements, and the need for the variance is because of the 18' dedication requirement. Mr. Baccus took exception to the statement in Planning Commission Resolution #92 -1 stating the applicant has indicated no willingness to alter its plans to meet setback requirements. He further stated a car wash is vital to the gasoline service station. The main business is gasoline sales and car wash services; the convenience store is a very small portion of the business. In closing, Mr. Baccus stated Phillips 66 Company has eleven facilities in the Twin Cities, and the company maintains very high standards. Councilmember Scott noted the application indicates a 24 -hour operation, and asked Mr. Baccus if he was aware the City Council recently approved for first reading an ordinance that would rohibit a 24 -hour operation at p p t his location. In response, Mr. Bac 'd h F , cct�5 5a1 e was aware of the ordinancc, DAVE NELSON Mr. Nelson advised the Council he has been working closely with Mr. Baccus on the redevelopment of this site. He felt the City Council may have to review and revise its ordinances for effective redevelopment of the City. He briefly reviewed the site plan, and stated he felt the proposal represents good redevelopment of the area which is consistent with the comprehensive plan. In closing, he asked the Council to carefully consider the proposal. 2/10/92 ANDY RAU OWNER OF HOI IDAY STATION 6$49 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD Mr. Rau advised the Council he has built two stations in the past five years, one with a car wash and one without. He has experienced problems with his station/car wash in New Hope, and he felt Phillips 66 would experience the same problems a t this i . p site, He felt the site is far too small for such development m that it would not allow for an adequate drainage system. Another problem would be the noise created by the blowers used to dry the cars. The residents surrounding his gas station/car wash in New Hope complained of the noise. As a result of these problems, the City of New Hope recently placed some restrictions on his car wash facility. In closing, Mr. Rau invited the Council members to visit his station at 36th Avenue and Highway 169 in New Hope to view the area to see how these problems can arise. The Director of Planning and Inspection emphasized that staff and the Planning Commission certainly are not apposed to this type of development, and they have met oft and on with Phillips 66 and Mr, Nelson for quite some time to discuss the problems with the setback requirements and the nonconforming use problem due to the residential abutment. He felt redevelopment of this site will be difficult because of the size of the F arcel. The Director of Planning and Inspection pointed out to the Council Mr. Rau went through this same process five or six years ago when he redeveloped the Holiday Station on Brooklyn Boulevard. The same standards were applied to his application. Mr. Rau had acquired some additional property, combined land, and also dedicated right of way property along 69th Avenue. The City Manager stated the 50' setback requirement pushes the buildings back toward the residential area and generally the s preference S y p e is to keep he activity toward Brooklyn P ty oo yn Boulevard so the 50' setback requirement really isn't working well for this area. The City Manager further pointed out the current guide plan basically hasn't produced much redevelopment in the City. He felt the Council needs to address these problems. As the community is aging, the Council may have to evaluate and alter its setback requirements in order to promote redevelopment. He suggested the Council may want to have the staff and Planning Commission examine these issues and asked for some direction. Mayor Paulson stated he would like to see the City move forward with a request for proposals for a consultant to provide assistance in Creating character for the community, and determining the type of redevelopment the City should proactively pursue to create that character. In response, the City Manager will draft a request for proposals within the next two weeks. Councils t Scott stated this plot of land is under the same setback restrictions as all the other plots, She does not want to see the City reduce the setback requirements which would allow businesses to develop lose to the roadways. She felt ' i n it s unattractive and p y creates traffic congestion. She is proud of the way Brooklyn Center looks and she wants to maintain that look. She also stated she is very concerned about having a car wash at this particular 2/10/92 - 12- site because of the likelihood of ice buildup on the roadway. She has seen many car accidents as a result of ice buildup from car washes, and consequently she could not support a car wash at this location. Councilmember Pedlar stated that although there is a great deal of opportunity for redevelopment along Brooklyn Boulevard, certainly nothing had been done to date. He felt the Council needs to look into the future and address redevelopment of Brooklyn Boulevard, He felt redevelopment of this particular site as proposed would not be a problem if the 18' dedication requirement did not apply. He felt this proposal is a good redevelopment opportunity, and would like to see something worked out to move ahead with it. Councilmember Cohen provided some information from a real estate journal indicating Brooklyn Center is not doing well in the area of redevelopment. In addition, he presented a 1965 map which showed very little development along Brooklyn Boulevard Since that time, He noted Phillips 66 has come forward with a plan and the financial capability to redevelop a vacant, deteriorating site, He felt the City should take advantage of it and work it out with Phillips 66. He suggested the City Ordinances be amended to either offer some type of credits for the taking of right of way to compcnsate for the ]and that would be required for the setbacks or to develop a Brooklyn Boulevard zoning program, Councilmember Cohen suggested sending the plan back to the Planning Commission for them to review it and work out some options for ordinance amendments with whatever it takes to try to accommodate this particular development, and to look at how it fits in with the land space from 69th Avenue North to 73rd Avenue North. Councilmember Scott asked Councilmember Cohen how he would justify only the segment north of 69th Avenue and not the segment south of 69th. Councilmember Cohen suggested possibly because the area between the freeway and 69th Avenue is more commercial. Councilmember Cohen further stated he felt the Planning ommission is looking for o g r direction from the Council, and it is up to the Council to set the, tone for desired redevelopment. He stated the City does not have the money to offer financial assistance to businesses for development and redevelopment, and therefore needs to somehow encourage businesses to come into the community on their own. Councilmember Cohen asked about the 30- day time clock running on the Phillips 66 applications. In response, the City Attorney stated the Council had 30 days to respond TO the special use permit and variance request, and possibly a bit longer on the plat approval. The City Attorney stated further that the applicant could choose to waive the compliance requirement which would provide the Council additional time. Cohen asked Mr. Baccus if Phillips 66 would agree to extend the time on these applications to allow time for the Council to explore the suggested options. Mr. Baccus stated Phillips 66 would be willing to extend the time, 2/10/92 - 13. The City Manager stated the way this has been done in the past is that the applicant has simply waived the 30 -day time limit, and when the , applicant wishes to reinstate the 30 days and start the clock running again, the applicant would write a letter to the City to that effect: In response, the City Attorney stated a good approach might be to request the applicant to waive compliance to the 30 -day time limit in writing, subject to the applicant's right to reinstate it by giving written notice to the City. Councilmember Rosene stated that although he has some concerns with the possibility of Ice buildup and crowded conditions, he would prefer to see the site developed rather than left vacant. He concurred with Councilmember Cohen's recommendation that the Planning Commission work on options for ordinance amendments addressing this issue. Mayor Paulson stated he would like to see the Council address ordinance amendments separately rather than in the context of this particular applicant/land situation, There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Rosene to table Planning Commission Application Nos, 92001 92002 and 92003 with the concurrence of the applicant, and request the Planning Commission to work on possible ordinance amendments that would encompass both sides of Brooklyn Boulevard redevelopment from 69th Avenue to 73rd Avenue and explore the concept and legality of offering setback credits to developers. Councilmember Pedlar stated that in addition to the specific area indicated in Councilmember Cohen's motion, the area at 63rd and Brooklyn Boulevard is ideal for redevelopment. He felt the City needs to move forward in the redevelopment of Brooklyn Boulevard, and asked for the Mayor's support of the motion. The City Manager noted the Council had been in similar situations on a number of occasions, wherein the Council's desire was to address ordinances as a whole rather than toward ane specific application. He felt the Council should pass this motion to keep the application r moving, process ov H stated pP p g. e staff will then automatically nclude these ns su ti Y gges a and options in examining a policy amendment plan. He will provide, the Council with an estimate of the cost and time frame involved for obtaining assistance in examining a policy amendment plan. Mayor Paulson felt businesses are in fact approaching Brooklyn Center for development, as this was the second application for a gas station in just a couple of months. He emphasized the need, however, for the City to first decide on the type of community it wants to create, and then make some determinations, for example how many and in what areas of town gas stations should be developed. In addition, he felt the City does need to proactively seek redevelopment. 0 2/10/92 14 Councilmember Cohen felt the City does not have the money to go with a grandiose plan for redevelopment and needs to seek development tools from the legislature. He felt developers want incentives or hot spots in which to build, The motion passed unanimously. The City Manager suggested Phillips 66 submit a letter addressing the 30 -day time limit, as suggested by the City Attorney. RE= The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 9:06 p.m. and reconvened at 9:20 p.m. ORDINANCES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 34 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES RLGARL)INQ WALT. AND FRE . T,ANDINQ SIGNS IN THE C -2, I -1 AND I -2 ZONING DTSTRI(7,5 The City Manager presented an Ordinance Amending Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances Regarding Wall and Freestanding Signs in the C2, I1 and I2 Zoning Districts. The City Council had discussed this ordinance amendment proposal at its December 2, 1991, and December 16, 1991, meetings. The amendment reduces the amount of allowable wall signs in the stated zoning districts from the current 30 %v of the wall area to 15 %. The ordinance also establishes a provision to allow additional freestanding signs in these zoning districts provided the establishments agree to forego all other permitted wall signs and comply with various standards established. This ordinance amendment was offered for a first reading on January 13, 1992, published in the City's official newspaper on January 22, 1992, and was offered this evening for a second reading, Mayor Paulson opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on An Ordinance Amending Ch �34 of the, Cit Qrdinancc R , rdin W all a nd Fre . ndin ins i g p ty s ega g a a esta g S g n the C2, I1 and I2 Zoning Districts at 9 :20 p,m. He inquired if thcrc was anyone present who wished to address the Council. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Cohen to close the public hearing at 9 :21 p,m. The motion passed unanimously. QRDINANCE NO. 92 - Member Celia Scott introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption; AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 34 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING WALL AND FREESTANDING SIGNS 11N THE C -2, 1 -1 AND I -2 ZONING DISTRICTS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by member Dave Rosene. The motion passed unanimously. 2/10/92 .15 - DISCUSSION ITEMS T COMMUNICATIONS TASIL FORCE UPDATE The City Manager advised the Council the Communications Task Force has met and reviewed the issues it will be addressing as directed by the Council. He stated the Task Force felt the lighting for the cable casting of Council meetings, however, should definitely be a decision of the Council. He briefly reviewed the lighting options that had been presented at the February 10, 1992, meeting, and asked the Council for some direction. The Mayor recommended the Council members make a decision after viewing tonight's broadcast on television to see what the quality was like. Councilmember Pedlar agreed with the Mayor, and stated it would provide an opportunity for the Communications Task Force momber$ to view tonight's broadcast as well. In response to Councilmember Cohen's request for comment on the viewing of the video of the different types of lighting in the various council chambers, Councilmember Scott felt the drop cone lighting with the cones recessed all the way across the Council table provided the best lighting scenario and was less obtrusive and created less shadows. She emphasized the need for a good quality product. The City Manager said staff will look at the least expensive way to get the best non -glare lighting, above eye level, and comparable to Golden Valley lighting. He will report back to the Council at the next meeting. AGREEMENT FOR CABLE CASTINC SERVICES The City Manager presented an agreement for cable casting services between the City of Brooklyn Center and Northwest Community Television for the provision of professional staffing services for cable casting of all regular City Council meetings, and a resolution amending the 1992 general fund budget to provide cable casting services. Councilmember Scott felt the costs in the Northwest Community Television agreement were 100 reasonable, and that it is clear they do very competent work. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar approving the agreement for cable casting services between the City of Brooklyn Center and Northwest Community Television for the provision of professional staffing serviCes for cable casting of all regular City Council meetings. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO, 92 -28 Member Cclia Scott introduccd the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1992 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO PROVIDE CABLE CASTING SERVICES The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Ferry Pedlar. The motion passed unanimously. 2/10/92 -16. PR�LTIZATION PROM �S FOR UNIT 111 CITY COUNCIL BUDGET The City Manager advised the C,ouneil members they will have an opportunity to participate in the prioritization process for the City Council's budget. A sampling of the questionnaires being sent to every department was provided to the Couneil members, and they were asked to indicate some ideas for modifications and reductions to the City Counc budget. et. The g e for submitting these ideas is February 19. On February 24 the Council will be asked to assign priorities to each of the items and return to the rankings to - g the Personnel Coor d i nator mat orb March arch 4 for a presentation of the composite results at the March 9 Council meeting. The Personnel Coordinator briefly reviewed the questionnaire, and responded to questions and comment from s o the CouneiI on specific items in the Unit 111 Budget. APPOINTMENT OF COUNCIL MEMBER TO TRI CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION The City Manager advised the Council a Council member had not yet been appointed to the Tri City Airport Commission. There was a motion by Mayor Paulson and seconded by Councilmember Scott appointing Councilmember Pedlar to the Tri City Airport Commission. The motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Pedlar accepted the appointment. FEASIBILITY QF JOINT MEETING BE CITY COUNCIL AND FO SCHOOL DISTRICTS The City Manager acknowledged the Council had recently met with the Brooklyn Center School District, and asked if the Council members want to meet with the other three school districts separately or in one joint meeting, Councilmember Scott stated she often gets calls from various members of the school boards, and it seems there has not been a lot of discussion or communication among the City and the four school districts. She felt a joint meeting with the four school districts would be an excellent way to address and resolve mutual problems, and would most likely result in some cost savings for all. Councilmember Cohen suggested individual meetings at the various school board meeting rooms and then a joint meeting with a representative of each school board spaced out over one year. The Council and staff discussed the scheduling and priority of the meetings. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Rosene directing staff to schedule individual meetings with the four school districts within Brooklyn Center and then a joint meeting with a representative of each school district over a one -year period of time, The motion passed unanimously, 2/10/92 - 17- ENEORCEMENT PQLICY FOR VEHICLE EM �SION S7ANDAIZDS VIOLATION IN l NOOKL YN GEN 1 hX The City Manager stated Councilmember Rosene had called with some concerns regarding the City's method of enforcing emission standards on vehicles which appear to be in violation of State emission standards. He distributed and reviewed a memo from the Police Chief outlining the City's enforcement methods and 1991 citation figures. The City Manager advised the Council that while Minnesota Statutes do not authorize the City to require a suspected violator to have his vehicle checked at a public inspection station, there may be a way to address that wherein the City could have the suspected violator report back to the police department for a recheck, or else issue a tag instructing the suspected violator to return some type of repair certification. Councilmember Rosene felt the City should establish a policy of not wanting these cars polluting Brooklyn Center. The City Manager advised the Council the police department staff are checking to see if the City can require suspected violators to go to the public inspection station. He will report back to the Council at the next meeting. FIVE -CITY JOINT DISPATCH FACIL FEASIBILITY STUDY The City Manager presented a resolution Authorizing Participation in a Five -City Joint Dispatch Feasibility Study and Transferring Funds, and stated the joint effort is on behalf of five cities, Brooklyn Center, Crystal, Golden Vallcy, New Hope, and Robbinsdale, to determine the feasibility, the quality, and the cost savings of a joint dispatching system. He advised the Council the five cities felt the concept of one central dispatch for the group would be beneficial in terms of reduced operating costs because of the combined labor plus increased efficiency and effectiveness of a centralized dispatch station. He stated the feasibility study will provide an objective evaluation of the existing public safety radio and telephone communications used by the five cities. He recommended the Council adopt the resolution. In response to Councilmember Pedlar's question as to the positions of the police and fire chiefs of the cities included, the City Manager stated all of the police and fire chiefs supported the idea with the exception of one fire chief who, while not opposed, had expressed a concern. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -29 Member Jerry Pedlar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN A FIVE CITY JOINT DISPATCH FEASIBILITY STUDY AND TRANSFERRING FUNDS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dave Rosene. The motion passed unanimously. 2/10/92 -18 _ ACQUIS1 ION OF HOUSE AT - 53RD AVENLJE N ORTH The City Manager advised the Council the house at 706 - 53rd Avenue North, which borders the south end of Bellvue Park, has been returned to HUD. He stated several years ago the Housing Commission and Park and Recreation Commission had discussed the possibility of the City acquiring the homes on this particular block as they became available to possibly design a parkway entrance at that point. This is the first home to become available since those discussions, and he felt the Council should discuss and provide some direction to staff. The EDA Coordinator reviewed the information, and advised the Council members he would develop some options to finance the purchase if in fact the Council desired, Councilmember Cohen expressed support of the acquisition, and stated it is an entry point to the City and certainly a parkway entrance would be more appealing than the existing condition of the homes in that area. Councilmember Scott agreed the homes in the area are not in good condition and continue to deteriorate rapidly. She felt it would be good for the City to buy the land as it becomes available, and to develop larger buildable lots for some nice homes which would provide a nice entry point into the City. She expressed concern on the costs of expanding an already good -sized park that currently has little usage, and she felt an entrance on the south end would not be desirable. Councilmember Rosene felt combining the lots and putting u new homes would be more . p g P beneficial to the City than an extended park. The Council and staff continued to discuss several options that could be considered for this area such as a combination of new housing and a park entrance. Councilmember Sett again emphasized an entrance on the south side of the park would not be desirable for several reasons. The park is in the middle of a block and it is difficult for police to patrol it. Vandalism has been a problem; the park is full of broken glass; and the neighbors bordering the park have experienced vandalism. She felt the park should be designed to serve more of the younger children of the area, rather than unsupervised teenagers from the south area and from Minneapolis. She advised the Council rl she would not support a parkway entrance. Mayor Paulson felt the City should determine exactly what it will do with the property before committing to the purchase. In response, Councilmember Rosene stated the Housing Commission and Earle Brown Neighborhood Croup already have that vision of what they would like to see done with this area, and he encouraged the Mayor to discuss it with those groups. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Cohen directing the E,DA Coordinator to ask HUD to put the sale of this property on hold, and to refer this possible purchase to the Housing Commission and to the Earle Brown Neighborhood Croup to see if they would be interested in this type of property acquisition in the southeast neighborhood, The motion passed unanimously. 2/10/92 - 19- I r AN ORDINANCE AMENbINCx CHAPTER 5 REGARDING THE FIRE _D_ EPARTMENT AND LIKE PREVENTION The City Manager presented a proposed Ordinance Amending Chapter 5 Regarding the Fire Departmcnt and Fire Prevention and a resolution Approving Amendments to the Fire Department Bylaws. He advised the Council the staff report outlines the major changes, and it is presented this evening for discussion only. He invited the lire Chief and Personnel Coordinator to present the information, The Personnel Coordinator advised the Council the resolution should be passed only after the ordinance has been amended. The Fire Chief stated the changes basically clean up the language such as deleting fire marshal, adding the safety officer position which is required by OSHA, and changing the auditing committee to the financial planning and audit committee. He advised the Council the members of the fire department have had input, have agreed to the proposed changes, and have agreed the amendment provides a comprehensive fire code for the City of Brooklyn Center, Councilmember Pedlar congratulated the Fire Chief and City Manager for their work on the City's comprchensive fire code. The Fire Chief responded to questions from the Council on the proposed changes. Mayor Paulson asked the Fire Chief for a brief overview of what has transpired in the Fire Department during 1991. In response, the Fire Chief stated the department has been working on ventilation inspections; a program of ensuring ventilation hoods are being cleaned regularly and properly; inspecting sprinkler systems; getting into the apartment buildings once per year; and training staff to become certified in handling hazardous materials, Councilmember Scott also noted the Fire Department's first female volunteer has recently joined the Brooklyn Center Fire Department, Mayor Paulson asked for clarification of Section 5 -108 on the process of appointing a fire chief, and raised a discussion on where the authority lies in the City for appointment of such positions. Following a lengthy discussion, the Personnel Coordinator stated she will provide the language from Moth the City Ordinance and the City Charter which clearly outlines that authority and process. There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Rosene approving the Ordinance Amending Chapter 5 Regarding the Fire Department and Firc Prevention for a first reading. The motion passed unanimously. 2/10/92 -20- CULTURAL DIVERSITY COMMITTEE The City Manager advised the Council a number of agencies in the northwest suburban area, including the Northwest Hennepin Human Services C.Quncil, the cities of Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, New Hope, Crystal, Robbinsdale, and the school districts have been discussing a joint effort in rccob izing the need for training and creating awareness concerning cultural diversity issues. He brietly reviewed the information contained in the agenda packet, and asked for Council input /direction on the issue. Councilmember Rosene stated he would be interested in being Brooklyn Center's representative on the Cultural Diversity Committee. The City Manager responded to Councilmember Rosene's concerns on meeting times and dates by stating the Committee would certainly have to take into consideration working schedules in arranging the meeting times and dates. There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Cohen appointing Councilmember Rosene as Brooklyn Center's rcprescntativc on the proposed Cultural Diversity O)rnmittee and directing staff to prepare a resolution endorsing the proposed program. The motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar, and seconded by Councilmember Rosene to adjourn the meeting, The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 10:42 p.m. Deputy City Clerk Todd Paulson, Mayor Recorded and transcribed by: Pcggy McNabb Nurthcrn Counties Secretarial Scr icc 2/10/92 _ 21 - CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date February 24, 1992 Agenda Item Numbe REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: MAYORAL APPOINTMENTS DEPT. APPROVAL: �. 9 4, Patricia Deputy City Clerk � MANAGER REVIEW/RECONEVIENDATION. s No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUIVIlVIARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) • Four commissioners from advisory commissions are waiting formal reappointment to their respective commissions. They are as follows: PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION Thomas R. Shinnick wants to be reappointed to serve through 12 -31 -94 PLANNING COMMISSION Mark Holmes wants to be reappointed to serve through 12 -31 -93 Bertil Johnson wants to be reappointed to serve through 12 -31 -93 Ella Sander wants to be reappointed to serve through 12 -31 -93 It is also still necessary to appointed a chairperson for the Planning Commission. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION I recommend reappointment of the above listed commission members. If the Mayor and Council do not wish to reappoint these people they should be notified of this decision. I also recommend appointment of a chairperson for the Planning Commission. • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting flee 2 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Appointment of Election Judges for April 7, 1992, Presidential Primary DEPT. APPROVAL: S'4 t - � / V Sharon Knutson, Deputy City Clerk MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOMM ENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SU EVIARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) • On April 7, 1992, a Presidential Primary election will be conducted. All nine precincts will be open for voting and election judges are needed for this process. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION Appoint the attached list of persons to serve as election judges for the April 7, 1992, Presidential Primary. Precinct 1 Precinct 7 R- Mildred Egnell D -Mona Hintzman (Chair) R -Grace Freund R -Susan Coombe * R -John Freund D -Carol Benkofske D- Joanne Goddard R -Wendy Erklouts D- Arlene Groves D- Marion Gagnon D- Dorothy Nyberg R -Susan Heisler R- Marian Smith R- Imelda Mayleben D -Mary Gwen Stein R -Bruce Monkkonen R -Mary Thiebault R -Angie Olson D -Donna Wiggins R -L. Darlene Rosholt R- Barbara Wacek Precinct 2 D -Donna Jennrich Precinct 8 R -Tom Masley R -Trudi Ann Gores (Chair) D- McKevha Thomas D -Anne Bergquist D- Eileen Hannan Precinct 3 R- Doloris McGeorge R -Ann Bystrom (Chair) D -Ethel Pettman D- Clarence Beadles D -Ralph Saline D -Mary Lou Beecher R -Joyce Shudy Precinct 9 D -Rosie Teas (Chair) Precinct 4 R -JoAnn Reavely D -Helen Bolier R -Pat Skindelien -Ardis Fairchild D -Tracy Tyler 0 R- Patricia Lessner D -Joyce Nelson * Absentee Judges R -Mary VanDerWerf R -Ruth Johnson R- Barbara Sexton Precinct 5 D- Marilyn Tyler D -Kay Brosseau (Chair) R -Lois Froebel D- Lorraine Halter D- Beverly Hovde R- Arlene Kemp D- Gloria Voeltz Precinct 6 Catherine Wetzel (Chair) D -Doris Chapman R -Lora Jefferson D -Myrna Kragness D -John Mandrich R -Jo Swart D -E. Margaret Trautwein Have not served as an election judge before. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date9✓i Agenda Item Number /Q REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Planning Commission Minutes February 13, 1992 DEPT. APP VAL: RONALD A. WARREN, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND INSPECTION MANAGER'S REVIEW RECOMMENDATION: "��', .,3'w:•.�� ?, f No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) • • 1 MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION FEBRUARY 13, 1992 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission met in regular session and was called to order by interim Chairperson Wallace Bernards at 7:30 p. m. ROLL CALL Chairperson Bernards, Commissioners Mann, Sander, Johnson, Holmes, Kalligher and Sherritt. Also present were Director of Planning and Inspection Ronald Warren and Planner Gary Shallcross. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (January 30, 1992) Motion by Commissioner Mann seconded by Commissioner Johnson to approve the minutes of the January 30, 1992 meeting as submitted. Voting in favor: Chairperson Bernards, Commissioners Mann, Sander, Johnson and Holmes. Voting against: none. Not voting Commissioners Kalligher and Sherritt. The motion passed. ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE The Secretary then administered the oath of office to Commissioners Kalligher and Sherritt. Chairperson Bernards stated that there would be no election of a Chairperson Pro -Tem until a chairperson has been appointed by the Mayor. He clarified that he had no desire or design to be permanent chairperson. APPLICATION NO. 92004 (RITA BONNELL) Following the chairperson's explanation, the Secretary introduced the first item of business, a request for special use permit approval to operate a beauty shop in the lower level of the applicants home at 6840 Bryant Avenue North. The Secretary reviewed the contents the staff report (See Planning Commission Information Sheet for Application No. 92004, attached). The Secretary also explained that the limitation on a home occupation sign is 2 1/2 square feet. He stated that the activity level of the home occupation should be less than the activity level of the beauty shop at Humboldt Square shopping center. He stated that the home occupation must be incidental and secondary to the residential use of the premises. Commissioner Johnson asked about the limitation of 10 in the basement. The Planner explained that the building code does not require a second exit for a home business as long as there are no more than 10 occupants in the basement level at any given time. Commissioner Mann asked whether a special use permit of this type is transferable. The Secretary answered that special use permits generally go with the property, but that the city has looked at home occupations as an accessory use and that a re- review would be required if a different person were to move in and operate the home occupation. Commissioner Mann asked whether an insurance binder would be required for this home occupation. The Secretary stated that that is not a land use regulation. The Planner stated that an insurance binder might be required by the state under their licensing provisions. In response to a question from Commissioner Holmes regarding ventilation and plumbing improvements, the Secretary stated that the city would issue permits and do inspection on the work but that the work is actually required by the state and would also be inspected by them. In response to a question by Chairperson Bernards, regarding fire codes, the Secretary stated that a fire extinguisher would be required in the area of the home occupation. He added that another exit is not required as long as there are not more than 10 people occupying the basement. Chairperson Bernards asked about the hours of other home beauty shops generally. The Secretary stated that there are a variety of hours. He stated that the people performing services are not necessarily busy the 2 -13 -92 1 whole time that they may have hours available. He stressed that all home beauty shops should operate on an Aft appointment only basis. Parking is also prohibited on street. He stated that the city has received few complaints regarding beauty shops over the years. Chairperson Bernards asked whether they could be open on holidays. The Secretary answered that those hours have not been restricted. Commissioner Johnson asked whether the 7:00 pm ending time meant that the last appointment would be at 7:00 pm or if work would finish at 7:00 pm. The Secretary stated that it might mean that the last appointment would be at 7:00 pm. Commissioner Holmes asked whether Ms. Bonnell would be the only person operating the home business. The Secretary stated that it was limited to a one chair operation. He noted that a previous home occupation had allowed an occasional employee and that one is allowable under the ordinance but has not been sought in this case. Commissioner Sherritt asked whether there had been any input from the neighbors. The Secretary stated that none had been offered as yet. Chairperson Bernards then asked Ms. Bonnell if she had anything to add. Ms. Bonnell stated that she has insurance and will transfer that insurance coverage to her home beauty shop. In response to a question from Commissioner Mann regarding employees, Ms. Bonnell stated that she would have none. She also stated that the 10 hour days would be a maximum and that she usually does between 3 and 10 haircuts a day. Commissioner Sander asked whether she had walk in traffic now at the Humboldt Square. Ms. Bonnell responded in the affirmative, but added that she would operate on an appointment only basis. Commissioner Mann asked whether she would have a sign. Ms. Bonnell stated that it would be a small sign if any at all. Commissioner Holmes asked whether snow shoveling of the driveway would be required. The Secretary stated that, if the lack of shoveling forced on street parking, the city might get calls and it would then have to be done in order to observe the requirement for no on street parking. He stated that home occupations generally regulate themselves. Commissioner Mann asked whether the tools used in the home beauty shop cause any TV or radio interference and if filters would be used. Ms. Bonnell responded that she uses the same size hair dryer as people use in their own homes. She did not see why it would be necessary to filter such equipment. Chairperson Bernards asked Ms. Bonnell why she was moving from Humboldt Square shopping center. Ms. Bonnell responded that the rent at Humboldt Square is simply too high for her to make a living at that location. PUBLIC HEARING (Application No. 92004) Chairperson Bernards then opened the meeting for a public hearing and asked whether anyone present wish to speak regarding the application. Mrs. Madeliene Roche of 816 69th Avenue North pointed out that no parking is allowed on 69th Avenue North. She stated that when she has family gatherings, her family has to park on Bryant Avenue North. She stated that is where her on street parking is. She stated that she had no objection to business as long as it did not interfere with this ability to park on Bryant Avenue North. Mr. Dick Tetzlaff of 6832 Bryant Avenue North stated that he had no problems with the home occupation. Mr. Joe Roche of 816 69th Avenue North also stated that he had no objection to the home occupation. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Motion by Commissioner Mann seconded by Commissioner Holmes to close the public hearing. The motion passed unanimously. ACTION RECOMMENDING APPLICATION NO. 92004 (RITA BONNELL) Motion by Commissioner Johnson seconded by Commissioner Sherritt to recommend approval of application of No. 92004, subject to the following conditions: 1. The special use permit is granted only for a one chair home beauty shop. The use may not be altered or expanded in any way without first securing an amendment to this special use permit. 2 -13 -92 2 2. The beauty shop shall operate on an appointment -only basis. Hours of operation shall be from 9:00 am to 7:00 pm, Monday through Friday and 8:30 am to 3:00 pm on Saturdays. 3. The applicant shall provide the city with a current copy of the state shop license prior to issuance of the special use permit. 4. The applicant shall obtain required permits for plumbing and ventilation work. 5. The applicant shall install a 10 lb. fire extinguisher in the room of the home beauty shop. 6. There shall be no more than 10 people in the basement area at any given time. 7. All parking associated with the home beauty shop shall be off - street on improved space provided by the applicant. Voting in favor: Chairperson Bernards, Commissioners Mann, Holmes, Sander, Johnson, Kalli 9 her and Sherritt. Voting against: none. The motion passed. OTHER BUSINESS The Secretary then updated the Planning Commission on the action taken on the Phillips 66 application. He stated that the City Council tabled the applications with the applicant's consent and indicated that it was willing to look at a modification to the setback requirement along Brooklyn Boulevard between 69th and 73rd Avenue North. Chairperson Bernards asked what upcoming business there was. The Planner indicated that a group home ordinance was being worked on and that an office /wholesale distribution facility at 69th and Shingle Creek Parkway had been submitted for possible application in March. The Secretary added that the real estate sign ordinance would also have to be reviewed in the near future. Following further brief discussion of some issues to relating to the Planning Commission, Chairperson Bernards again extended a warm welcome to the two new planning commissioners, Commissioners Kalligher and Sherritt. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Sander seconded by Commissioner Holmes to adjourn the meeting of the Planning Commission. The motion was acknowledged by the Chairperson and the meeting was declared adjourned at 8:19 pm. Chairperson 2 -13 -92 3 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting oate_ q I Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Planning Commission Application No. 92004 - Rita M. Bonnell ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. AP OVAL: RONALD A. WARREN, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND INSPECTION MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:` s No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) Planning Commission Application No. 92004 submitted by Rita M. Bonnell is a request for special use permit approval to operate a beauty shop in the lower level of her home at 6840 Bryant Avenue North. This application was reviewed by the Planning Commission on February 13, 1992. Attached for the Council's review are minutes, information sheets, and a map of the area relating to this application. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended approval of this special use permit for a home occupation at its February 13, 1992 meeting. • 0 Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 92004 Applicant: Rita Bonnell Location: 6840 Bryant Avenue North Request: Special Use Permit The applicant requests special use permit approval to operate a beauty shop in the lower level of her home at 6840 Bryant Avenue North. The property in question is zoned R1 and is bounded on the north, east and south by single - family homes, and on the west by Bryant Avenue North. Single - family homes are also on the opposite side of Bryant Ave. North. Home beauty shops are classified as special home occupations and require the approval of a special use permit. The applicant has submitted a brief letter and floor plan of the lower level of her home. In the letter, Ms. Bonnell explains that she wishes to move her beauty salon which is located in the Humboldt Square Shopping Center to the basement of her home in a room that is approximately 13' x 13 She states that she would be "open" from 9:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. weekdays and 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Saturday. She states that she has a large driveway; so there would be no on- street parking. She expects only one or two cars at a time. The services she would offer would be hair care, facial hair waxing and ear piercing. Access would be from either 65th or 69th to Bryant Avenue North. She intends to have a fire extinguisher and she has fire alarms throughout her home. Customers would enter the front door of the home, which is a split level, and go down the stairs to the basement level. Ms. Bonnell concludes her letter by stating that she has been an operator for over 20 years and has had her own salon for over 30 years. Her Manager's and salon license numbers are given. Staff's biggest concern with the proposed home occupation is that service be rendered on an appointment -only basis rather than just attracting walk -in traffic. The hours and the services offered are also more than is customarily the case with home beauty shops. Nevertheless this operation can probably be comprehended as a special home occupation as long as services are rendered on an appointment -only basis and signery lives within the limits of the Sign Ordinance. Ms. Bonnell has been somewhat difficult for us to reach. We would recommend that the Commission discuss these and other concerns thoroughly with her at Thursday's meeting. Approval of this special use permit should be subject to at least the following conditions: 1. The special use permit is granted only for a one chair home beauty shop. The use may not be altered or expanded in any way without first securing an amendment to this special use permit. 2 -13 -92 1 2. The beauty shop shall operate on an appointment -only basis. Hours of operation shall be from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Saturdays. 3. The applicant shall provide the City with a current copy of the State shop license prior to issuance of the special use permit. 4. The applicant shall obtain required permits for plumbing and ventilation work. 5. The applicant shall install a 10 lb. fire extinguisher in the room of the home beauty shop. 6. There shall be no more than 10 people in the basement area at any given time. 7. All parking associated with the home beauty shop shall be off - street on improved space provided by the applicant. Submitted by, Gary Sha llcross Planner roved by, Ronald A. Warren Director of Planning and Inspection 2 -13 -92 2 �I -- -- o C z NEIYTON N AVE. L � �_ V T--- -- 1 t AVE. I fl _ �C t -t M--- 1 CREEK PMCMY. S UI 1. � l _f� � C ] l -1. _ OGA AVE. N R. -- - L = [,I-- �_ I1 AVE. 1_l ����N� I} -� y (� J JAMES AVE. N. EARLE OMN DR. Z -� , z Z JAMES AVE. N. 'N 'NID 53►1V � � ;� m I IRVING AVE. N? - -- IRV !G AVE. N. —� D ,� A - 1 - F � �� m HUIpf3GLDT _ _AVE, N - _ I — - -- HUMBOL AVF -- -_ - - - - -- - - C T I ctRARD AYE N. t � t N. GIRARD AVE.. ) — - _ � > --- --_ -__._ ! ��� • FREMONT l - �� � � < EMERSON AV E. N `- '- � °I � AVE• Ll._C�_l_� r ' �- N EMERSON AYE. ° I - - - - - - -- DUPONT _� J A E - -C� __ -- DUPONT AVE. N. L 1 1 [ DUPD�NTAVE. N•J Z 1 DUPONT 1�(T - 11 I_r 7I TI-11 a t C �Id 1�F3 `p COLFAX AVE. N. � �J -�,d - -- COLFAX AVE_ N•� '�' � \ VD H - >: BRYANT AVF. N. O X PBRYAH1 -�� xv ALDRICN : �' y r`T�r - �_ � CAMDEN N AVE. - - -- VF AWEN AVE. N. N _ AVE. N_ -- . ) ------ 441 --- ...•i:��irirrr rr.r. r ••...r•••r�..�__ t,.lS- � - - -��� • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Dace 2/24/92 Agenda Itcm Number a REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: AN ORDINANCE VACATING A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT IN CENTAUR ADDITION * �k�k�k e�k�k> k> evc�k�! e�k�k�Kycx�; eye�k�K> k�F�k�k>; c�k�F�k�k�k��k�k�k�k�k�k�k�k�K> k�k�; c> k�F��k> k���K�k�k�kxx� ;c�xxxyeyeYCxye�?e DEPT. APPROVAL: W t Sy Knapp, Dir& of Public Works M ��R��R�kikm�k .��k MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: 0 No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached �ky c> k? e�k�k} c�c�k> c�e��> k�k�k�k�k�k�k�; c�k�k�k�FM> c>; e�k�k�k�k�k�k�k�K�k�k> k> k> K�k�k�k�; c�c�k> k�k�k> k >k�Kae�e�k�k�kycx�kM�k�K>ex�erc SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes • The plat of CENTAUR ADDITION recorded in 1976 dedicated ublic utility an P Y d drainage easements along its perimeter, and adjacent to one of the interior lot lines. Mr. Noah Bridges, the owner of Lot 3, Block 1, has requested that the City vacate the easement adjacent to (address - 6712 Emerson Avenue North) his southerly lot line. It is his desire to build an addition onto his garage, into the area currently dedicated as public easement. The attached exhibit is provided for reference. The preliminary plat for this development (dated 1976) did not indicate a need for an easement along the southerly lot line of Lot 3 (as eventually platted), and staff has not been able to determine why the final plat reflects an easement. It is now proposed that the drainage and utility easement which occupies the southerly 5 feet of Lot 3 be vacated. The private utility companies serving the area are reviewing this request. City staff are also reviewing locations of any City -owned utilities to determine if the City should retain any portion of the easement. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION An ordinance is provided for consideration and first reading by the City Council. If the first reading is conducted, the proposed ordinance will be published along • with a notice of public hearing. After the second reading and public hearing, the City Council would then consider final adoption of the ordinance. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of at P.M. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider An Ordinance Vacating A Drainage And Utility Easement in CENTAUR ADDITION. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3350 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE VACATING A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT IN CENTAUR ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The five foot drainage and utility easement along the southerly line of Lot 3 Block 1 CENTAUR ADDITION Hennepin County Minnesota, except the westerly 10 feet and the easterly 5 feet thereof, is hereby vacated. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of , Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date 6718 z 10' X 35 r 6712 ( 50) �i o � o .o � P ROPO SED E q SeMeNT V ACAT/ ! LOT 3 ,BLOCK � CENVAUMID ADON CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date V9�( Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES TO REQUIRE A MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN CERTAIN EARLY MORNING /24 HOUR COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS AND SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS IN THE R1 AND R2 ZONING DISTRICTS DEPT. APPROVAL: RONALD A. WARREN, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND INSPECTION ;s MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOMMENDATION No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION - (supplemental sheets attached ) The City Council has for some time been considering the possibility of amending the Zoning Ordinance to prohibit certain early morning or 24 hour commercial operations from being in close proximity to single family and two family residential areas. This matter has been discussed by the City Council at its meetings on December 2 and December 16, 1991 as well as on January 13 and January 27, 1992. The ordinance amendment had a first reading on January 27, 1992, was published in the City's official newspaper on February 5, 1992 and is offered to the City Council for second reading and public hearing on February 24, 1992. At the City Council's direction the staff notified property owners and operators of affected property about the proposed ordinance changes and the public hearing scheduled for February 24. Attached is a copy of the letter sent to various owners and occupants and a list of all those who were notified. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council, following public hearing on this matter, consider the proposed ordinance amendment for final adoption. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 24th day of February, 1992, at 7:15 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to require minimum separation between some commercial operations and certain R1 and R2 zoned property. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES TO REQUIRE A MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN CERTAIN EARLY MORNING/ 24 HOUR COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS AND SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS IN THE R1 AND R2 ZONING DISTRICTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Section 35 -412. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS IN C2 DISTRICTS 8. Commercial operations which are open for business to the general public for service, entertainment or retail sales between the hours of 12:00 midnight and 6:00 a.m. shall not be located closer than 200 feet from any single family or two family dwelling in an R1 or R2 zoning district measured from property line to property line. The following uses, situations or conditions are lawful exceptions to the hour limitations imposed by this section of the ordinance: a. Temporary promotional events authorized by administrative permit pursuant to Section 35 -800 of this ordinance b. Uses that are separated from single family or two family dwellings by major thoroughfares as defined in Section 35 -900 of this ordinance and 69th Avenue North between Brooklyn Boulevard and TH 252. C. Medical emergency services d. Hotels, motels or lodging establishments except for that part of those operations which may involve, eating, drinking and /or entertainment activities e. Tennis clubs, racquet and swim clubs and other athletic clubs and health spas except for any permitted outdoor activity_ f. Any service /office use which is also permitted in the Cl zoning district g The lawful use of a commercial operation for service, entertainment or retail sales during the hours of 12:00 midnight and 6:00 a.m. existing at time of the adoption of this ordinance may be continued provided, however, that the hours of operation shall not be expanded beyond the hours existing at the time of the adoption of this ordinance. If the use ceases to operate during the restricted hours for a period of two consecutive years the restricted hours may not be re- established. Such a lawful non - conforming use of the property shall not result in the prohibition of any expansions or alterations permitted by this ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. Section 35 -800 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMITS. No person shall use hiss property or /and assist, countenance or allow the use of his her or of another's property located within the municipality for any of the following purposes or uses without first having obtained a permit from the City zoning official. The use shall not for the duration of the permit, considering the time of year, the parking layout for the principal use, the nature of the proposed use and other pertinent factors, substantially impair the parking capacity of the principal use or impair the safe and efficient movement of pedestrian and vehicular traffic either on or off the premises. A waiver from certain provisions of the sign ordinance and from certain parking requirements of this ordinance is implied by the granting of the administrative permit, but only for the duration of the permit and to the extent authorized by said permit. 2. Out -of -door retail sale, storage and display of merchandise or offering of services when accessory to or promoting a permitted use or special use within a non- residential zoning district as follows: b. Miscellaneous out -of -door retail sales or displays or promotional events_ including promotional events that would allow otherwise prohibited service, entertainment or retail sales in the C2 zoning district between the hours of 1.2:00 midnight and 6:00 a.m., for periods not to exceed 10 consecutive days. Two such 10 day permits may be allowed per premises per calendar year. The permit fee shall be as set forth by City Council resolution Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon 30 days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of 1992. Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Underline indicates new matter.) CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BIJ OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 ROOK LY N TELEPHONE: 569 -3300 C ENTER FAX: 569 -3494 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 CITY COUNCIL 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 569 -3300 Dear Commercial Property or Occupant: The City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center is considering amending the City's Zoning Ordinance to require a minimum separation of 200' between certain early morning or 24 hour commercial operations and single- family and two - family residential areas. Operations which are so situated would not be allowed to be open to the general public for business between the hours of midnight and 6:00 a.m. The purpose of this proposal is an attempt on the part of the City Council to address the negative impacts such as noise, light glare, traffic, etc. such operations have on nearby residential areas during a time when a residential area might normally expect quiet and a reduced activity level. In addition to the normal legal newspaper notice, which appeared in the Brooklyn Center Sun -Post on February 5, 1992, the City Council requested that affected property owners/ occupants and the Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce be specifically notified of the City Council's consideration and public hearing. The public hearing will be held on Monday, February 24, 1992 at approximately 7:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Brooklyn Center City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway. You are invited to attend and comment. Included with this notice is a copy of the ordinance proposal and various maps showing properties that would be affected. As you will note from the attached ordinance amendment there are certain properties, uses and situations which are exempt from the proposed hour restrictions. Also, the ordinance allows an otherwise restricted 24 hour operation to be allowed as part of a promotional event for up to 10 consecutive days through the issuance of an administrative permit. Two such 10 day administrative permits may be granted per calendar year. i�auu�zcacm �`'A Page 2 Another important feature of the ordinance is that any operation which is already op duri the hours of midnight and 6:00 Y p g g a.m. which would be prohibited by the new regulations may continue to operate during these hours, but they may not expand them beyond the current limits. If such a use ceases to to be open during these hours for a period of two consecutive years, the hours may not be re- established. If you have any questions or need some clarifications on this proposed ordinance before the Council's consideration on February 24, 1992, you may contact me at City Hall during daytime hours at 569 -3300. Again, you are encouraged to participate in the public hearing and express your opinions at that time. Sincerely, LJ� Ronald A. Warren Director of Planning and Inspection `` � � ~ w it- . f`' • - - - - � �• y-14. ` �� �... 1 _ I I 1 •�: 1 _ -1 • __ 1 w ,M 171M\ - �` aYbrv,.._ ^ -...,Y � .- � � ' i h _ {r: tt J A 4 1 - i r rr �q IT _ �,1.- - _ -- - - - - - , l L {1 .N;E1 , l T LL11 1 L LL1� 1 I 1 . w - t y F M NTI , X ,x \ Ll III a -�� - - fff w , N ''v � __ x _till� C 1iLl�iiI _ �- 'a v of ,i — f11 • Q ;. L ' .�i X , i i � _ � —. -- 1 111 t: �.--�.� RUES AVE. N. ,;CIE „ Gt7IC ,. ..,.\', `�,� `.°, i \! \�;�`i�. \`: .�.�`•�., , -�t // � .. {' � t , } C ;fY I � - __ l - .Y ! '+ y ' 1 M `i N iAY YvDA �� �i y J \ , \`�: : \:�:� �� \ `,. .,1, `,`. `,`. `, t /•. M/ / •.Y _� - I H ( _ - /� / �{7 ®��]{ - `1F`' k i ____._.. �f "x `''r.T r .\ � A `,Y,`, `, `. :�: ;���: `;•�:� _. t n - J I � l � I { M \ \ 1 - i b 1 _ � ��1.1��. ��� h .�� _�, : ^'rye ` `: . \',`:.;:i �. \;,�.`. `,..;,`�. `; ,•. 7f11 I > . 'S: -t N � x _ I� N 7 /,r 1111H WWW , • I „ i `• Y 3 - 1 ' H ` ! � • .ND AVI � SSS " '�•.� (I�IV n � . .. -... _� - . n l T ' `\ 1 , Z G 1 I I .�_��. �_�.- � � . 4 .. - 1, w+, °m 11 ILI � qII J 1 I 111 I ttt 1 1 1 � 1 Av? oc c Y •4,.3 l _ — y TI It :, Ir` { ► f 1a 1 �; [ _ I f I _ — • 't - 1 7 - °r AYC i V -V _ � 1 t NLY \ �� � -1- } 1 l .v 531141 I - f 1 - U ..,J Only ; � �. -�� �� �•� i � � - - _� � �� =� - I , - �- b7 _ _��� - - � � —;' ��o •� �•�`���- - _ - - -. r vNVIDNI }�,`. -�� / �.yll..`�.1 r� �' _ l �J - � LL �..a.__• ..w+r .. • �� N 31Y 1 - l T ina - - N :,Y ��. °• / ` �i t �1__ I �� L < < -� f� •l. _ _ 1 ------- _ - -__W u �- `�� ::.' �� �' _ � �,� � '., � � , >�;. •---� ice;- -� x �,���. �.-t -- - l) o�� I 1 — �i �i d �331 v e�, Yn ooLy -- F1 �L �� L � � � uAUOrt A E N. 1 � r., r .; _ � .- I . _III ' � I . L : \ � .` �.. 3 �f✓'� ; . - --- - - — _ - -- �/ � ,, NCf7Lf AVE.� N• 1 I 'I ',,I,�+1��' 1 �. - \` L � F-7 .. u t �- t Q 25 8 r � � � td - _ � � . — _ _ _ � �J � - - - F 3`.r '`•� I I I ��� 1, }- �. _ �� +-•+�(1 � OOIS / �_ t��� _ 1 \\ - qj JJ-- R T ff - ,[ «�s },1 F N. / f l / Y W, A -- --------- - 4 ` /!� i '�- �\� `T• - � - F�, -- —� 5; it CIA - - -- _- '. � -� r I '_... � � � - - — L u -= ` —`mss! L..l; LLa�.�� -- `��- ,�'��'_I I� • z' ^yj i I l 1 L `,6TH. Al - E N t EJC9ERG Ca \ � Y i \� tSA TU t ' � t 5 '�,-! r f ,,,i.. -a I �^ rr —»-�� ✓� n�!'� � � i ,'� _. ��,•: /` x; X /q `�i'' r�'%f � `I [ , - I �� i y"3RD. - fI�.9,p , /' // •f, .� i �; i ,rYf• %��. ` I i , L_� � �- �;:;i „`;,,;;:'; �r�ki i' n �_�. • --'T � !4 - �i�1 U6/ ;j J A:E. h I 1 1 7 1 1 1 V X. LL MIDOLC- 0 4TH � TNIri C .VI it moo- o LAKE ','” +FF2E A'VF- <erH A� r- _ � •, =.`�� .,. 481H AVE rf �/ — � ,y - — . _tea• IIIr r RYAN LANE � - 1 TY Or�,O��I�S`D. / ' i1._r -1 fit 46IT41 AOF N . ,1 �I I I NOTE SEE fEse►/fif: AND FL006w• CETAILED Ihf Re E and H Properties Arlo Johnson Robert & Donna Iture 16 13 Lawrence Road 6280 Lakeland Avenue N. 12185 48th Circle N. 1ocklyn Center, MN 55429 Minneapolis, MN 55422 Plymouth, MN 55442 Roger Scherer Duoos Bros. Amer. Legion Dennis & Carole Hansen 12001 Bass Lake Road Post 630 Housing Corp. 5222 Minnequa Drive Plymouth, MN 55442 4307 70th Avenue N. Golden Valley, MN 55422 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Byron & Phvllis Wilson Frithjof Moen Jr. Clifford Lane 6956 Brooklyn Blvd. 6938 Brooklyn Boulevard 17210 12th Ave N. Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Brooklyn Center, MN 55529 Plymouth, MN 55447 Phillips 66 Company Ronald Schnoor Northern States Power Co. 6800 College Blvd. 5338 Quail Ave. N. 414 Nicollet Mall Overland, KS 66211 Crystal, MN 55429 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Velie Motor Co. O.K. Penn Realty, Inc. William Koenig c/o Bob Ryan Olds. 1429 Walnut St. 9304 Loch Lomond Ave. N. 6700 Brooklyn Blvd. Philadelphia, PA 19102 Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 or oklyn Center, MN 55429 City Realty, Inc. Abko XXIV, Inc. Sportsman's News Network 6005 Wayzata Blvd. P. O. Box 1919 5001 Drew Avenue No. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 c/o Chrysler Corp. Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Detroit, MI 48288 Normandale Tennis Club Northbrook Partners Ronald Lee 5525 South Cedar Lake Rd. 4301 Highway 7 3148 Kentucky Ave. S. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 St. Louis Park, MN 55426 Gene C. Anderson Ericon, Inc. Robert & Michelle Milavetz 5814 Knox Ave. N. 5459 Brooklyn Boulevard 2385 Cherrywood Drive Brooklyn center, MN 55430 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Superamerica Group, Inc. Mr. Jon Baccus Chamber of Commerce P. O. Box 1400 P. 0. Box 1967 6205 Earle Brown Drive #110 Lexington, KY 40517 Houston, TX 77251 -1967 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Occupant Northern States Power Red Owl Country Stores 6912 Brooklyn Blvd. 4501 68th Ave. N. 3610 63rd Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 silders Square Union 76 Bridgeman's 00 63rd Avenue North 6245 Brooklyn Blvd. 6201 Brooklvn Boulevard ooklvn Center, Mn 55429 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Brookdale Chrysler Hiway 100 Racquet & Swim Club Acme Typewriter 6121 "Brooklyn Blvd. 4001 Lakebreeze Ave. N. 1900 57th Ave. N. Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Brooklvn Center, MN 55429 3rooklvn Cneter, MN 55430 Anderson Drywall Occupant Subway Sandwich Shop 2121 57th Ave. N. 2121 57th Ave. N. 1950 57th Ave. N. Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Brooklvn Center, MN 55430 Brooklvn Center, MN 55430 Milavetz & Associates Superamerica 1915 57th Ave. N. 1901 57th Ave. N. Brooklvn Center, MN 55430 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date 2/24/92 • Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 20 REGARDING TREES DEPT. APPROV Sy Knapp, erector oeVublic Works MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attaahed SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes • The attached ordinance would establish policies regarding the care of trees in Brooklyn Center. It was offered for a first reading on January 27, 1992, and published in the City's official newspaper on February 5, 1992. It is offered tonight for a second reading. Also included are two resolutions. The first resolution establishes the varieties of trees which will be allowed in 1992 as boulevard trees. This list has been somewhat expanded to include more cultivars and to include some ornamental trees. Section 20 -200, subd. 3 assures that all boulevard trees will be located so as to avoid creating future sight distance problems. The second resolution establishes the registration fee for tree contractors wishing to do business in Brooklyn Center as $25. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION Conduct a second reading of the ordinance and hold a public hearing. If the ordinance is adopted, consider and approve the two resolutions. • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of , 19 , at p.m. at City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider An Ordinance Adding Chapter 20 Regarding Trees. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request as least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 20 REGARDING TREES TO THE CITY ORDINANCES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 20 is hereby added to the City Ordinances with language as follows: CHAPTER 20 - TREES Section 20 -100. PURPOSE. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish policies to protect and enhance the City of Brooklyn Center's urban forest to the extent found by the City Council to be practical within available financial and staff resources. Section 20 -101. MANAGEMENT The director of public works or designee shall be responsible for developing policies regarding the care preservation planting replanting removal or disposition of trees and shrubs in parks in the public right of way, along trails and in other public areas and for developing an annual tree planting and maintenance plan Section 20 -102. DEFINITIONS. The language set forth in this ordinance shall be interpreted in accordance with the following definitions. Boulevard. The area between the edge of the street or the back of the curb where curb and gutter exist and the property line Public tree. Any tree or shrub located in any park, _public right of way, trail, or other public space. Public space. Includes but is not limited to the grounds of public buildings: designated open space: city owned property' street alley, and trail rights of way. 0 CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF TREES Section 20 -200. PUBLIC TREE CARE IN GENERAL. Subdivision 1. Care of Trees in Public Areas. The City shall have the right to plant, prune, maintain, and remove trees, plants, and shrubs in parks, in the public right of way, along trails, and in other public areas, as may be necessary or desirable to protect public safetv or to preserve or enhance the svmmetry and beauty of such public grounds. Subdivision 2. Removal of Unsafe Trees. The City may remove or cause or order to be removed any tree or part thereof which is in an unsafe condition or which by reason of its nature or location is injurious to sewers, electric power lines, gas lines, water lines or other public improvements, or is affected with any injurious fungus insect or other pest. Subdivision 3. Planting Boulevard Trees. No tree may be planted on the boulevard except by permit obtained from the director of public works or designee. The City may move, remove, or trim or cause or order to be moved, removed, or trimmed any boulevard tree not planted by permit or any boulevard tree which is not in compliance with this code. This section does not prohibit the planting of boulevard trees by adjacent property owners providing the selection location and care of said trees are in accordance with the provisions of this code. Section 20 -201. TREE TRIMMING. The City shall have the authority to trim trees in parks and other public spaces. The City shall have the authority to trim boulevard trees, as needed, to allow the movement of the tallest pieces of street maintenance equipment along the streets. The property owner shall be responsible for aesthetic trimming: for trimming on any corner lot which is necessary to allow visibility at intersections in the sight triangle bounded by the property lines of said lot and a straight line joining points on such property lines 25 feet from their intersection of the property lines, pursuant to Section 35 -560 of this code; for trimming of any boulevard tree or shrub which is necessary to maintain adequate sightlines for vehicles bicycles and pedestrians; and for any other trimming not specifically assigned to the City in this section. Section 20 -202. PRUNING AND REMOVAL OF DEAD BRANCHES AND TREES. Every owner of any tree within the City shall prune the branches so as to remove all dead, diseased, dangerous, or broken or decayed limbs. Any standing dead or fallen tree is hereby declared a public nuisance for purposes of sections 19 -101 throuzh 19 -106 of this code. Any such tree shall be removed and disposed of Promptly y the owner, or in the case of boulevard trees by the adjacent property owner. Standing and fallen dead trees located in public -owned nature areas or open spaces shall be removed at the discretion of the director of public works or designee. Section 20 -203. STORM DAMAGE. The City shall be responsible for cleanup of _downed or broken limbs or otherwise storm damaged boulevard trees. The adjacent property owner is responsible for stump removal. Section 20 -204. STUMP REMOVAL. All boulevard stumps shall be removed four inches below the surface of the ground so that the top of the stump shall not project above the surface of the ground. Section 20 -205. ABUSE OR MUTILATION OF TREES No person shall intentionally damage, cut, carve, transplant or remove any public tree; attach any rope, wire nails, advertising posters or other contrivances to any public tree; allow any gaseous, liquid, or solid substance which is harmful to such trees to come into contact with them: or set any fire or permit any fire to burn when such fire or the heat thereof will injure any portion of the tree: or to direct or authorize such activity or circumstance. Section 20 -206. PRESERVATION STANDARDS No Excavation Permit Building Permit, Plat Approval, Site Plan Approval or other relevant Permit or Approval may be granted until the director of public works or designee determines that the existing trees are adequately protected and preserved. Only adequately protected and preserved trees may be considered as providing credit toward site landscaping requirements for certain types of development detailed in Chapter 35 of this code. DETECTION AND CONTROL OF TREE DISEASES Section 20 -306. CITY COST PARTICIPATION The City shall pay 50 percent of the cost of removal of diseased boulevard trees provided such removal is conducted under the City's annual Diseased Tree Removal contract. PLANTING OF TREES Section 20 -400. DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF STREET OR SIDEWALK. Where there is no sidewalk, no tree may be planted closer than eight feet from the edge of the street, or from the back of the curb where curb and gutter have been installed. Where there is a sidewalk and the boulevard is greater than twelve feet wide boulevard trees are permitted provided they are planted no closer than six feet from the edge of the street or from the back of the curb and no closer than three feet from the edge of the sidewalk Where there is a sidewalk and the boulevard is between six and twelve feet wide boulevard trees are permitted provided they are planted in the middle of the boulevard Where there is a sidewalk and the boulevard is less than six feet wide no boulevard trees may be planted Any trees planted within sidewalks must be Planted utilizing tree grates Such sidewalk planting is subject to design details approved by the director of public works No tree may be planted closer than four feet from the edge of the sidewalk on the side opposite the street. Section 20 -401. UTILITIES. No boulevard trees other than those which may attain a maximum height of 25 feet or less at maturity may be planted under or within 10 lateral feet of any overhead utility wire No boulevard tree may be planted over or within 5 lateral feet of any underground water line sewer line, transmission line, or other utility. Section 20 -402. RECOMMENDED TREE SPECIES The City promotes a diverse urban forest so as to minimize the spread of tree disease To assist in meeting this goal, the City Council shall annually adopt a resolution designating allowable boulevard tree species REGISTRATION OF TREE TRIMMERS /REMOVERS Section 20 -501. REGISTRATION REQUIRED It shall be unlawful for any individual partnership or corporation to conduct as a business the cutting trimming pruning removing spraying or otherwise treating of trees or shrubs in the City without first having secured a registration from the City to conduct such business Application for the registration is made through the City Clerk or designee Registration will be granted upon proof that the applicant meets the requirements of section 20 -502 The annual fee for registration is set by Council resolution from time to time The registration expires annually on December 31 Registration is not transferable The registration fee must be paid to the clerk at the time of application The registration fee will not be prorated Section 20 -502. REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS The applicant must file with the clerk a certificate of insurance showing the applicant has purchased public liability and worker's compensation insurance which will remain in effect for the term of the registration and that the insurance will not be canceled without 10 days notice to the City. The policy or policies of public liability insurance shall provide public liability coverage to the applicant in the amount of $100,000 for bodily injury to or death of one person per occurrence, $300,000 because of bodily injury to or death of more than one person or occurrence and $100,000 property damage coverage per occurrence and shall name the City as an additional insured Section 2. Sections 19 -1501 through 19 -1505 are hereby renumbered 20- 301 through 20 -305. Section 3. Section 19 -1506 is hereby renumbered 20 -900. Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective after publication and thirty (30) days following its adoption. Adopted this day of 19 Mayor ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING ANNUAL LIST OF ALLOWABLE BOULEVARD TREES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center promotes a diverse urban forest so as to minimize the spread of tree disease; and WHEREAS, section 20 -402 of the ordinances provides for an annual listing of allowable boulevard tree varieties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The following is the list of allowable boulevard trees for 1992: Ash (Patmore) Japanese Tree Lilac Ash (Summit) Linden (American) & cultivars Ash (Autumn Purple) Linden (Littleleaf) & Crabapple (Flowering) & cultivars cultivars Hackberry Maple (Norway) & cultivars Honeylocust (Imperial, Shademaster, Maple (Red) & cultivars Skyline, Thornless) Maple (sugar) & cultivars Ironwood Oak (Pin) Oak (White or Bur) 2. Exceptions may be made to the above list only by written permission from the Director of Public Works or the Director's designee. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. I Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEE FOR REGISTRATION OF TREE CONTRACTORS WHEREAS, Section 20 -501 of the Brooklyn Center city ordinances requires that persons or firms conducting within the city a business cutting, trimming, pruning, removing, spraying, or other wise treating trees obtain registration with the city clerk; and WHEREAS, section 20 -501 establishes that there will be an annual fee for said registration, said fee to be established by the City Council from time to time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the registration fee for tree contractors wishing to conduct business in the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby established as $25 per year. Date Todd Paulson Mayor > y ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date 2r 4/92 Agenda It= Numberi REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION �--- ITEM DESCRIPTION: CABLE CASTING OF COUNCIL MEETINGS DEPT. APPROVAL: Geralyn R. Baro e, Personnel Coordinator MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECONEUENDATION: A No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) • City staff has been working cooperatively with representatives of Collins Electric Co. to develop a proposal for improving the lighting of the council chambers for cable casting city council meetings. We anticipate that Collins will have a proposal ready sometime early in the week of February 24, but not in time for the staff to obtain a second quotation and present it to the city council for approval on February 24. We would like to discuss the timing for approval of lighting enhancements, such as waiting until the March 9 city council meeting for approval or making arrangements to contact all city council members prior to March 9 to obtain approval to move forward with any lighting improvements. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION Discuss timing of approval of lighting enhancements. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 2/24192 i Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 40 ITEM DESCRIPTION: COMMUNICATIONS TASK FORCE UPDATE DEPT. APPROVAL: LK6""-IPL Gera lyn R. Barone, Personnel Coordinator MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOMMENDATION: V No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUNEVIARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) • The communications task force met on Wednesday, February 19, 1992. Attached is a draft of the meeting minutes (not yet approved by the task force). Also attached is a very rough first draft of a position description for a communications coordinator developed by the task force. The task force is looking for input and direction from the mayor and city council regarding the description (i.e., does it reflect what the council would like to see in the position description; if not, how should it be amended ?). The council should also discuss where it is going from here with the description if approved. The task force did receive comments at a past meeting that the position should be considered by the City's financial task force in the context of all other budget reduction /revenue enhancements that are being considered as part of the service prioritization process underway in the City. The council has earmarked funds in the 1992 contingency fund for a communications position and some office furniture and computer equipment to accommodate it. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION Review /discuss /amend communications coordinator position description; determine next steps for this position. • 4 5..7 x:01 Li MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE AD HOC CITY COMMUNICATIONS TASK FORCE FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION FEBRUARY 19, 1992 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Capshaw called the meeting of the communications task force to order at 7:07 p.m. ROLL CALL Chairperson Capshaw, Members Warner, Andrewjeski, Benjamin, and Brandvold. Also present were Mayor Todd Paulson; Personnel Coordinator Geralyn Barone, staff assistant and recording secretary; and guest Dan Reiva. Members Keehr, and Pfann were absent from this evening's meeting. Member Miller arrived at 7:20 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 29, 1992 There was a motion by Member Warner and seconded by Member Andrewjeski to approve the minutes of the January 29, 1992, communications task force meeting. The motion passed. OTHER BUSINESS Chairperson Capshaw recognized Mr. Reiva, who said he recently forwarded to Mayor Paulson some proposals regarding use of cable television. Mayor Paulson noted Mr. Reiva appeared before the city council at its public hearing on cable casting city council meetings. Mayor Paulson distributed to the task force members a copy of the letter to him from Mr. Reiva dated February 18, 1992. Mr. Reiva said there are four basic ideas in his letter that require some fleshing out before being finalized; however, the letter provides some parameters for discussion. Mr. Reiva said it would be good for the City to clarify the type of programming it wants, have a consultant assist in determining programming objectives, and then determine the equipment needed to support these objectives. He noted the town meetings could be covered for about $1,500 per meeting. Chairperson Capshaw asked what the purpose of the documentary item would be, and Mr. Reiva said the end result would be a production rather than live taping. The town meetings would be edited, and post - production would result in a more watchable program that could be replayed over and over again. Mayor Paulson said if the communications coordinator could help set up the town meetings, people could watch and expect the meetings to be on the air and the process could be refined as time passes. Member Brandvold said the 02 -19 -92 -1- im _ T V 0 L D 1 1 � I town meetings would be valuable if edited. She asked if city council meetings are replayed on cable television in an unedited 0 version, and Barone said they are. Member Brandvold asked Mr. Reiva if he is suggesting editing city council meetings, and Mr. Reiva said he is not. He noted these are best left unedited because it becomes a political issue of what gets edited and what does not. Mr. Reiva said a summary program with the highlights of the council meetings could be produced, but this would be in addition to the full unedited version of the council meetings running on cable television. He noted the town meetings with public hearings could be edited. Mayor Paulson suggested a lot of good input on these issues can be obtained at a public hearing. Member Miller arrived at 7:20 p.m. Chairperson Capshaw asked Mr. Reiva what costs are included in his third proposal to install closed circuit television cameras in the council chambers for cable casting meetings at a cost of around $28,000. Mr. Reiva said these are purchase price startup costs with a system that is geared to only one operator. Chairperson Capshaw asked Mr. Reiva to further describe the video disk system described in his fourth proposal. Mr. Reiva said this state -of- the -art proposal, now part of a pilot project in Bloomington, puts all of the City's video programs and character generated pages on an interactive medium called a video disk. Viewers can call up on the telephone and select a topic they wish to watch. He noted everyone sees the selections over the entire cable system, but there is a four to five minute limit per person and information is presented in ninety second infomercials. There is a $30,000 pricetag for equipment and production costs. Mr. Reiva noted topics could be handled by rolling video, still pictures like a slide show, or videographics. He added not everything is a video production. Chairperson Capshaw asked if the City defined the information it wants to communicate, how long would it take to get the video disk up and running. Mr. Reiva said it would take approximately three months. Member Brandvold asked how much it would cost to add additional programs. Mr. Reiva said if you want to add programs, a new disk costs $500; therefore, it is essential to have upfront planning. He added an auxiliary could be used for unexpected updates by using a VCR hooked into the system which could be programmed for the VCR to play when special updates are selected. He added this technology does have some inflexibility by making it expensive to add items. Member Brandvold gave an example of work being done by the Earle Brown Neighborhood committee and asked Mr. Reiva if all of the housing information could be placed on one disk. Chairperson Capshaw said housing would be part of the total disk, with other 02 -19 -92 -2- D information on the same disk. Mr. Reiva said the disk is an encyclopedia of all the information you think people want to know. Member Benjamin asked what channel this would be played on, and Mr. Reiva said Bloomington has two channels, one for city council meetings and the other for video disk programming. Chairperson Capshaw thanked Mr. Reiva for coming to this evening's meeting and said the task force appreciates the opportunity to hear about this information. COMMUNICATIONS COORDINATOR POSITION Chairperson Capshaw said the task force has discussed the communications position in the context of recommendations in the Coleman & Christison communications audit, and Mayor Paulson has prepared information regarding the communication position. Chairperson Capshaw said at the last meeting, the task force decided to use the position descriptions for communications positions from the cities of Brooklyn Park and Minnetonka as a basis to establish Brooklyn Center's description. He suggested the task force needs to think of this position in terms of the goals it has developed with the three components of information, involvement, and identity. He added the task force should also consider the way in which the position will include marketing, promotion responsibilities, and volunteer coordination responsibilities. Chairperson Capshaw noted one of the goals is for this position to assist in drawing people into participating in City activities. Member Brandvold asked if both Brooklyn Park and Minnetonka's positions are full -time, and Barone responded affirmatively. Member Benjamin noted this is a major position in any company or business. Chairperson Capshaw said the task force should look at ideally what should the position look like and how it will be paid for. He suggested walking through the combined description and making suggestions to amend it. Member Benjamin noted the money question is still an issue, because not only will money be spent on the position, but money will be spent on things this person will be doing. Chairperson Capshaw noted that Councilmember Cohen has suggested the position might be set up as part -time. The task force proceeded to review the position description, first discussing the primary objective of the position. Mayor Paulson noted his interest in this position and said it is important how this person relates to the city council, staff, and the public. He said this person needs to be a free floating agent. He noted one of the problems he sees in the city is that everything has to go through the city manager's office, and he would like to free up the city manager to look at the big picture of things going on in the city rather than funneling everything through the city manager. He suggested this staff person should be able to be free floating, acting as an ombudsman. He added this position would need to be 02 -19 -92 -3- , fr 6 l accountable to the city manager, but he would like to go directly to this person. Barone briefly reviewed for the task force the city's charter that establishes a council- manager form of government. The task force made some amendments to the position objective used in the Brooklyn Park position description. The task force proceeded to review the responsibilities of the position, using the combined description generated from the Brooklyn Park and Minnetonka descriptions and made changes to fit the needs of Brooklyn Center. Mayor Paulson said he would like someone to assist in keeping the advisory commissions memberships up -to -date. Barone explained how the staff liaisons to the various advisory commissions keep track of any vacancies, inform the council of these vacancies, and assist in notifying prospective residents to participate on the commissions. Chairperson Capshaw asked how people have become involved with the Earle Brown neighborhood group. Member Brandvold said neighborhood groups were formed years ago, and the group for her neighborhood was formed from this group. Barone explained the neighborhood advisory groups are established throughout the city, and have been primarily used for issues relating to planning and zoning. She added the neighborhood advisory groups were also used to solicit input during the 1980 park bond project. Member Brandvold said the Earle Brown neighborhood group has found its newsletter to be well received. Mayor Paulson said if the City enters into a new dynamic of getting Y g Y Y people involved, it would be nice to have a person to coordinate this involvement. He gave an example of a reforestation plan, where the City has put an ordinance in place. He suggested an urban forest league could be created to get volunteers involved and develop a newsletter. He said the communications person could make sure all these types of groups are coordinated. There was discussion regarding the volunteer coordination component of the position description. Mayor Paulson suggested the position description be established as very inclusive, and then the strengths of the person hired could be matched with the needs of the City to further refine the job duties. Chairperson Capshaw expressed concerns about diffusing the description too much to detract from the main position objective. There was discussion regarding "How are We Doing" forms that the City has used in its various departments to solicit input from residents. Barone said the recreation department is an example of one area where the City has received input from the public using this format. Mayor Paulson said if a resident calls the City with a concern, he would like to see a system where a form can be used to describe the problem and record all the pertinent information related to the concern. A copy of the form could be kept for further reference. 02 -19 -92 -4- Do I L L � Member Miller suggested the communications person could design this form. Barone proceeded to describe the City's pilot project of a customer response system, which is a database system established by the City to track the types of concerns Mayor Paulson has noted. She added this is a very new program for the City and is being used on a limited basis at the outset. Member Warner suggested the desktop publishing duties described in the responsibilities should be included in the qualifications section instead. Member Brandvold said with regard to qualifications, she feels the Minnetonka language is best with regard to education and experience. Chairperson Capshaw suggested adding a separate section describing marketing responsibilities which could identify what the City has to offer, spell it out, capture it, and put it out to the public in a positive sense. After some discussion, the task force agreed this person could act as a marketing liaison with the Tourism Bureau, the Chamber of Commerce, and the Earle Brown Heritage Center. Chairperson Capshaw suggested updating to the City logo could be part of the marketing responsibilities. Member Brandvold suggested the City could capitalize on Earle Brown Days and the Earle Brown Heritage Center to assist in presenting a positive identity for Brooklyn Center. Member Benjamin pointed out there is a minimal advertising budget for Earle Brown Days. Member Warner suggested the section regarding assisting departments in the development of internal communication training need not be included in this description, and the task force members agreed. The task force discussed the general administrative support section of the responsibilities and noted the mayor should be included in the section where the communications coordinator would assist the city manager, council members, and department heads in research and preparation of reports. Mayor Paulson said this would be very helpful for him to have assistance in researching and preparing written or oral reports. He added he would also like someone to assist in coordinating his schedule. Member Warner suggested this would be another part -time position that the mayor should think about, because she feels the responsibility for coordinating the mayor's schedule could be very time consuming. Member Miller suggested this person could look at ways to improve scheduling done in the City. Mayor Paulson suggested it would be helpful for him to have someone assist in his scheduling, particularly when groups come into the City, such as to the Earle Brown Heritage Center, and he could make a presentation on behalf of the City. He noted he enjoys doing this, but it would be helpful to have someone assist him in his . schedulin g p P Chairperson Capshaw asked how this has been handled, and Barone noted the former mayor handled all of his own scheduling. She added Mayor Paulson is not always at city hall during his scheduled office hours, and it would be helpful for 02 -19 -92 -5- �a staff to know his schedule so employees could better respond to inquiries on when the mayor is available. Barone suggested the position description can be put in the format of other City position descriptions. She will separate out a knowledge, skills, and abilities section from the qualifications. Member Benjamin asked Mayor Paulson what his timetable on this is, and Mayor Paulson said if the task force is comfortable with the changes it has made to the description this evening, he would suggest passing it to the city council as soon as possible for the council to review it and make any changes to it. Mayor Paulson said he would like to see this person be equal to a department head so the city council could be brought in on the recruitment and hiring of this person as provided for in the city charter. Mayor Paulson urged the task force to forward the position description to the city council for its review on February 24, 1992. After some discussion on how best to handle the draft version of the position description and get input from the task force, it was agreed that Barone would work with Chairperson Capshaw to make the changes and include a rough draft of the position description with the city council's agenda packet for February 24. NEXT TASK FORCE MEETING The next meeting of the ad hoc city communications task force is scheduled for March 18, 1992, at 7 p.m. Chairperson Capshaw suggested the task force could work on planning for a public hearing at this time. ADJOURNMENT The Brooklyn Center ad hoc city communications task force adjourned at 9 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Geralyn R. Barone Recording Secretary 02 -19 -92 -6- DRATT 2/92 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER POSITION DESCRIPTION POSITION IDENTIFICATION TITLE: Communications Coordinator DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office STATUS: Exempt SALARY SCHEDULE: Supervisory- Professional Schedule C DATE WRITTEN /REVISED: February 1992 POSITION OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this position is to coordinate the City's communication activities both externally and internally. This position will provide information to the residents and workforce of the City, increase citizen involvement in the City's activities and contribute to the development of an increased sense of identity of the City. This position will assist the mayor, city council, city commissions, city manager, and city staff in developing and enhancing methods which support the City's commitment to open, friendly, and responsive government. This position works under the general administrative direction of the city manager and performs skilled, professional, and technical tasks. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Develop, implement, and maintain a communication plan for the City. a. Plan, develop, and implement the City's communication plan. This will be accomplished by using feedback from the mayor, city council, city manager, communications commission, employees, media, and formalized feedback tools such as surveys. b. Work closely with City departments to enhance their communication effort in accordance with the communication plan. c. After the communication plan has been formulated and implemented, it will be the responsibility of this position to monitor communication trends and identify additional communication needs and to update the communication plan accordingly, setting new goals and objectives as required. 2. Coordinate communication with citizens. a. Brooklyn Center City Newsletter. 1. Coordinate content, production, and distribution of the City's newsletter. 2. Ensure the creation and maintenance of a historical file with copies of every issue of the City newsletter. b. Cable television government access channel. 1. Coordinate the programming of the government access cable television channel. 2. Oversee the cable casting of city council meetings. 3. Develop and assist others in the development of cable television presentations regarding specific City programs or activities and current City issues of interest to the general citizenry. 4. Ensure the creation and maintenance of a video library of city council meetings, other City meetings, City - sponsored activities, and television programs/ segments regarding the City. c. News media. 1. Regularly provide articles about specific City programs or activities of general interest to newspapers, radio stations, and television studios which provide service to the City. Assist other departments in preparation of articles for publication or broadcast. 2. Coordinate all information provided by the City to the news media. 3. Coordinate and monitor all City- related press releases. 4. Ensure the creation and maintenance of a "clipping" file for reference and historical purposes of published articles regarding important City issues. d. Act as staff liaison to designated citizen and business groups and advisory boards. e. Serve as volunteer coordinator for activities such as town meetings, neighborhood meetings, and other activities involving residents of the City. f. Citizen inquiry and response process. 1. Respond to citizen inquiries as directed, answering correspondence, phone inquiries, and How Are We Doing forms. 2. Works with City employees as directed to insure that accurate information is disseminated in response to public and media inquiries. 3. Coordinate communication between staff and the public. a. Act as an advisor to the city manager and department heads on internal and external communication issues. b. Assist City personnel in the development of presentations. C. Train, or provide for training of, employees in effective communication techniques. d. Produce and update a guide to standardize the style and format of City written materials. e. Provide for the video taping of City meetings, City - sponsored events, daily work activities and television broadcasts regarding the City, as required or requested. f. Provide support for departments in writing, designing, and publishing in -house publications such as brochures, books, and articles. 4. Coordinate employee communication. a. Coordinate the content, production, and distribution of the monthly internal employee newsletter. b. Assist staff in the development of communication and recognition programs for City employees. 5. Coordinate marketing of the City. a. In cooperation with the various school districts and the business community, maintain a detailed community information packet for new residents and /or businesses. b. Assist in the development of an increased sense of identity of the City by enhancing the City logo and other images of the City. C. Serve as liaison for marketing Brooklyn Center to the North Metro Tourism Bureau, Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce, and Earle Brown Heritage Center. d. Organize and direct any special events as directed by the city manager. 6. General administrative support. a. Assist the city manager, mayor, council members, and department heads in research and preparation of written and oral reports and speeches. b. Prepare correspondence and answer citizen inquires as directed. c. Assist in scheduling City events involving elected and appointed City officials. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES I. Knowledge of journalism and media techniques which provide a basis for reaching specific targeted audiences. 2. Knowledge of public relations, marketing, and community affairs field. 3. Skill in the use of computer equipment and software including word processing (WordPerfect 5.1 for Windows) and desk top publishing. 4. Skill in the use of video production equipment and production techniques. 5. Excellent ability to effectively communicate both orally and in writing using various formats and in a variety of situations. 6. Ability to work independently, providing self- direction. 7. Ability to develop, organize, and administer various organizational procedures. 8. Ability to deal tactfully and effectively with all City elected officials, personnel, outside agencies, and the general public. 9. Ability to assess and resolve problems with the tools available to do so. REQUIREMENTS 1. Training, experience, and education substantially equivalent to a four -year degree in Public Administration, Business Administration, Communications, Public Relations, or related field required. 2. Three to five years experience in promotions, public relations, community affairs, or related field required. 3. Working experience in local government or covering local government as a journalist preferred. POSITION DESCRIPTION APPROVED By City Manager Date Approved February 18, 1992 Mayor Toted Fain t n City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 RE: Proposals for Cable /Video Communication. Dear Todd: Thank -you for meeting with me last month. We brainstormed several possible approaches for implementing video and interactive multimedia technology as part of the Brooklyn Center government information channel. I propose four basic approaches to programming the municipal government channel: 1. Clarify programming objectives before purchasing production equipment through an ascertain of the city's programming needs. A set of programming objectives for a nine month or one year period could be defined. Approximate cost: $1500.00 2. Documentary coverage of town meetings, including shooting, editing nd necessary scri twritin . The final program g Y ram P g P g will capture the input of the town meeting and be useable for a variety of audiences including broadcast. Approximate cost: $1500.00 per program. 3. Cablecasting city council and commission meetings from the council chambers utilizing two remotely controlled cameras. The meeting will be taped for later re- cablecasting. One operator necessary. Approximate cost: $28,000 4. Interactive videodisc system that can store several hundred short video segments and video text with audio messages that can be selected by viewers using a touch - tone telephone. Approximate cost: $30,000. I will call you to discuss this ascertainment proposal and answer any questions concerning the above programming approaches. Si c� ' el v Daniel P. Reiva 1707 Amy Lane Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 566 -3889 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meetin Date February 24, 1992 Agenda Item Number / REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: HOCKEY BOOSTER FUNDING REQUEST DEPT. APPR Gerald . Splinter, L Cityy Manager * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ********************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOMIMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUN MARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) As a part of the 1992 Budget process, the request by the Brooklyn Center Hockey Boosters was considered by the City Council. You expressed concern over the precedent which could be set by this funding request and referred the overall policy question to the Park & Recreation Commission to develop a policy for your consideration (they are currently developing such a policy). During discussions regarding this matter, the City Council members indicated they might consider a "one- time" funding of equipment to keep the program viable. The Brooklyn Center Hockey Boosters have requested Council consideration of this type of funding. At your last Council meeting, you requested this be placed as a discussion item on this agenda. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date February 24. 1992 Agenda Item Number T REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE DEPT. APPR era d er, City anager * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ***************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECONMIENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUIVEVIARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) The State Legislature is again in session this week and taking up a number of bills. The latest information we have is that it is possible for the State revenue shortfall to reach as much as $600 million. We are not sure at this time the actual figure or what impacts the shortfall will have on municipal state aids. This week we (Mayor Paulson, Councilmember Cohen, Manager Splinter, Brad Hoffman and Tom Bublitz) met with Representative Carruthers and Senator Luther regarding the legislative interests of the City of Brooklyn Center. These discussions covered the Orrfield Bill relating to the control of urban sprawl, transit concerns and issues, housing legislation and Brooklyn Center's prioritization process. Representative Carruthers and Senator Luther were interested and supportive of the RTB /MTC concept of regional transit hubs out of such locations as Brookdale and encouraged Brooklyn Center's participation. Representative Carruthers and Councilmember Cohen debated the pros and cons of the Orrfield Bill (control of urban sprawl by limiting the sewer interceptor bonding capacity of the Metro Sewer District). Representative Carruthers believes there is some basic merit in the concept of the bill and Councilmember Cohen cautioned that while the concept behind the bill was valid, he wasn't sure it would achieve the goal of controlling growth in the urban fringe. Both Senator Luther and Representative Carruthers stated that the biggest problem the legislature is going to be facing is handling the shortfall. We made a brief presentation on the prioritization process and the potential damage to municipal services by severe cuts in state aid. Senator Luther and Representative Carruthers expressed interest in a cooperative effort between Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park on possible legislation which would address apartment building • deterioration. EDA Coordinator Hoffman presented information regarding a business retention program and Senator Luther suggested we work with state agencies to seek funding for the proposal. Attached please find a copy of a draft report on a Metropolitan Housing Revitalization Fund. Through his position on the Metropolitan HRA, Councilmember Cohen has been involved in this process and now the fund proposal which will eventually need state legislative support is going through the Metro Council approval process and has received favorable action at its initial stages. If this becomes a reality it could be a useful source of funding to address some of our housing . concerns. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION I Council discussion /comments /questions. I DRAFT REPORT A PROPOSAL FOR A METROPOLITAN HOUSING REVITALIZATION FUND DEVELOPED BY THE HOUSING LEGISLATION WORK GROUP January 1992 Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In June, 1990, Council Chair Steve Keefe, with Metropolitan Council approval, appointed a Regional Housing Task Force that was charged with "discussing and identifying the main housing problems facing the region in the 1990s and [recommending] adoption of regional policies, programs and legislation aimed at solving the identified problems." In January, 1991, the housing task force completed its work with the adoption of a report titled, Meeting the Region's Housing Needs in the 1990s. A Three -Part Proposal. In the course of its work, the task force identified a variety of housing needs and issues. Two paragraphs in the introduction to the task force report summarize the main issues: New construction in the developing suburbs attracts residents from older suburbs; vacancies in older suburbs attract residents from central cities, often leaving behind permanently vacant and deteriorating housing. Although such vacancies provide opportunities for redevelopment, they can also cause a financial burden for cities where they are located and can trigger large -scale abandonment in older neighborhoods. At the same time these market forces are occurring, certain kinds of housing needs continue to grow. Special segments of the population will place increasing demands on the housing market in the 1990s. For example, the region's minority population is growing much faster than the overall population. People in minority groups experience much higher poverty rates than do white people in the Metro Area. This signals a growing need for affordable housing and housing connected to a variety of support services. The Regional Housing Task Force recommendations were grouped under three main areas: additional funding for housing, new policy directions to guide housing and neighborhood revitalization programs, and development of regional and local housing plans. In July, 1991, Metropolitan Council Chair Mary Anderson appointed a Housing Legislation Work Group for the purpose of refining the legislative recommendations made by the Regional Housing Task Force and to develop a more specific proposal that could be converted into a housing legislation bill for the Metropolitan Council to introduce at the 1992 legislative session. Besides reviewing regional housing issues and need as earlier identified by the Regional Housing Task Force, the housing legislation work group looked at housing and neighborhood revitalization efforts that individual communities in the Metropolitan Area are involved in. Examination of figures provided by just a handful of communities provided an insight of the magnitude of the housing problem in the region: between $349 and $359 million annually for the next several years will be needed to address problems in Minneapolis, St. Paul, Bloomington, Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park; an additional $462 million is estimated by Richfield and Washington County as the dollars needed to implement their housing plans. With this added perspective on housing need, the work group set out to develop more specific 1 recommendations to address the region's housing problems. Regarding additional funding to address identified housing problems, the task force report had listed two major mechanisms: Expansion of the Housing Trust Fund to continue to finance the growing housing needs (p. 34, second bullet; several revenue sources were identified). and Creation of a "regional housing fund" which could be tapped by local governments to promote limited redevelopment of deteriorated residential areas when other strategies or redevelopment tools cannot be used in a cost - effective manner (p. 34, third bullet). Using the above housing task force recommendations as guidance for its deliberations, the Housing Legislation Work Group developed and adopted the following funding proposals on December 4, 1991. METROPOLITAN HOUSING REVITALIZATION FUND Funding Sources - Options 1. The Metropolitan Council could seek specific authority from the Legislature to allow the Metropolitan HRA to issue housing bonds with the understanding those bonds would not be supported by property tax. 2. Create a mortgage registry surcharge in the metropolitan area that would yield million dollars. 3. A 10 percent surcharge on the interest and penalties for delinquent property taxes collected. 4. A percentage of the state's lottery receipts. Administration of the Fund The Metropolitan Housing Revitalization Fund would be governed by a board that would include a minimum of three members appointed by the Metropolitan Council. The balance of the board membership would include persons with background in the type of problems that the fund is set up to address, e.g. physical deterioration of housing in the central cities and older suburbs, socioeconomic problems at the neighborhood level, housing needs of ethnic and minority groups as well as other special populations. T'ne fund could be administered by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency which already has in place the administrative mechanism to carry out this type of work. Program staffing and administration costs could be paid out by the fund. 2 Eligibility To access the fund a municipality would need to have a housing plan approved by its local governing body and reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. The plan, in turn, must respond to the regional housing plan and its relation to social service needs adopted by the Council. A municipality could receive financial assistance from the fund to complete the housing plan. Without an approved plan, no fund activity could occur in the municipality. Local matching requirements and development of an allocation plan or entitlement approach would also need to be specified. Application for funds must be approved by the governing body with citizen input. Criteria and a point system will need to be developed and evaluated annually. The target population for this fund will be individuals and families with incomes no greater than 60 percent of the median income adjusted for family size. EXPANSION OF THE HOUSING TRUST FUND The Housing Trust Fund should be targeted to individuals and families at 30 percent of median and below and should be maintained as a state -wide program which is being well used in the metro area. There should also be an additional funding source for the Housing Trust Fund: A 10 percent surcharge on t-'rt and penalties for delinquent property taxes collected in the -7 S �i e Income tax - Limit Deduction for Qualified Residence Interest. H.F, 2003 Introduced by Dawkins x(St. Paul) Clark x(Mpls) 1, An arson (International Falls) Committee on Taxes Amends Minnesota Statutes 1990, Section 290,62, and Minnesota Statutes 1991 Supplement, Section 290.01, Subd. 19a, relating to income tax deduction disallowances. Disallows any qualified residence interest in excess of $20,000. Requiring calculation of additional revenues due to this change and allocation to the housing assistance account. Neighborhood Land Trust Program - $20,000,000 Bonding H.F. No. 2004 introduced by Dawkins x(St. Paul) Clark x(Mpis) imoneau x(Frldiey) Rest x(New Hops) Runback "(Circle Pines) Committee on Housing Requires the Commissioner of Finance, on the Governor's request, to sell up to $20,000,000 in state bonds. Appropriates $20,000,000 to the Housing Finance Agency for leans or grants for purposes of the neighborhood land trust program. H. No. 2 Revitalization - Housing Assistance Account - Housing Revitalizatio Introduced by Dawkins x(St.Paul) Clark x(Mpis) Greenfield x(Mpls) Dauner x(Hawley) Runback } (Circle Pines) Committee on Housing Makes annual appropriation of funds in the housing assistance account for housing revitalization - 80% to the housing development fund for state matching funds for federal hone Investment partnership program and 20% to the housing trust fund account. TnTAI RAGF . O^ +. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date February 24, 1992 Agenda Item Numbcr REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: I BROOKLYN BOULEVARD STUDY (DRAFT RFP) DEPT. APPROVAL: Brad Hoffman, EDA Coor inator �? MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECONEMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SAY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) The RFP is a rough draft for Council discussion Monday evening. You will note that in calls for a study are from T.H. 100 to 73rd Avenue North as opposed to I -94 to 73rd Avenue North. This project would be funded with CDBG funds which require a ublic hearing establishing the project. P g J I will be available Monday to provide greater detail. I RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION Provide direction to staff on desired changes in the study and direct publication of notice for RFP. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL BROOKLYN BOULEVARD REDEVELOPMENT STUDY GENERAL INFORMATION The City of Brooklyn Center is a first ring northern suburb of Minneapolis. With an approximate population of 30,000, the City occupies 8.5 square miles. The City's economic base is a well- balanced mix of manufacturing, warehousing, retail, and service. Brookdale, a large regional mall, dominates the retail in the city and general area. Commercial industrial properties comprise 50% of the City's total market value, while residential property is the major portion of the other half of the property value. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Brooklyn Boulevard, historically referred to as Osseo Road, is an integral part of the commercial /retail base of the city, as well as a major traffic corridor. Over the past few years, there has been a noticeable decline in the overall appearance of Brooklyn Boulevard. The general condition of buildings is deteriorating and indeed some buildings are vacant or underused. The general decline in the area is of concern to the City. It is the desire of the City of Brooklyn Center to take an active role in stemming this decline before the problem becomes inordinate. The City's Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 1980, warns that a general decline in the "environmental quality" of Brooklyn Boulevard will have an adverse affect upon adjoining residential neighborhoods. In addition to the Comprehensive Plan, the City has undertaken two (2) separate studies, both of which were conducted by the Maxfield Research Group. The first was a comprehensive housing study comparing the present housing inventory with the City's future population housing needs. The second was a similar study of the comtmercial /industrial properties of the City. Both studies were conducted from a "market" oriented approach as opposed to a land use approach. Both studies have observations about Brooklyn Boulevard PROPOSAL The City of Brooklyn Center is seeking proposals for a study of Brooklyn Boulevard that will consider the two (2) axfield studies in conjunction with the Comprehensive rehensive Plan to be J P used to develop /update City policies and goals with respect to the redevelopment of Brooklyn Boulevard. Recommendations should not be limited by the confines of the Comprehensive Plan or the Maxfield studies but should address any recommended deviations. It is the intent of the City to use the study as a review of past policies, plans, and regulations affecting redevelopment of the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor STUDY AREA Length: Highway 100 north along Brooklyn Boulevard to 73rd Avenue North. Width: 200' from the curb on both the east and west side of Brooklyn Boulevard. SCOPE OF STUDY The study should provide Brooklyn Center with a rational /philosophical basis for establishing objectives and policies for the redevelopment of Brooklyn Boulevard. It should be of sufficient detail as to provide guidance by which development proposals can be evaluated. At a minimum, the final product should provide a conceptual development plan for Brooklyn Boulevard that considers: a. current setback requirements; b. buffering techniques to mitigate the impact of redevelopment on adjoining residential uses; C. separation of R -1 uses from commercial uses; d. landscaping; e. nonconforming uses defined in the guide plan versus those defined by current zoning; L prezone parcels or use the guide plan to direct future zoning; and g, types and density of developments recommended that are compatible with traffic capacity limitation. In addition, the study should identify potential impediments to development along Brooklyn Boulevard. Such impediments can be physical, financial, guide plan oriented, or ordinance related. Also, describe any techniques and /or ordinance that can be adopted to control or direct development on specific sites. Earl attention should be given to issues related to a specific development proposal for the Early g P P P P northwest corner of 69th Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard. PRODUCT REVIEW The selected consultant should anticipate an initial meeting before undertaking the study. In addition, two (2) preliminary reviews should be expected before a presentation to the council. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Study proposals will include a detailed description of the proposed study and methodology to be used. Also, RFPs will include a resume of the company submitting the proposal as well as resumes of the individuals who will work on the study. Fees for completion of the study must be included. Also, reimburseables must be estimated and submitted as a "not to exceed" cost. Finally, all RFPs must provide a completion time estimate. WORK PRODUCT The findings will be presented in a bound report and will include an executive summary section. One hundred (100) copies of the report will be delivered and the provider will make a formal presentation of the study to the city council. SCHEDULE FOR SUBMISSION AND CONTACT PERSON The completed RFPs are due no later than 4:30 p.m. on March 18, 1992. Eight (8) copies of the RFP should be delivered to: Mr. Ron Warren Director of Planning and Inspection City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Mr. Warren can be contacted at 569 -3330. This study is 100% Federally Funded with Community Development Block Grant Funds. Brooklyn Boulevard Study Introduction Brooklyn Boulevard, State Highway (TH) 152, serves a dual purpose for the City of Brooklyn Center: it provides arterial passage for traffic moving between Minneapolis and Brooklyn Park and it provides efficient circulation for numerous local trips. From the days of its early development as a rural dirt road through its modern evolution to a paved, four -lane State Highway, the Brooklyn Boulevard /West Broadway Avenue route has been uti- lized for traffic movement from central Minneapolis to the northwestern portions of Hennepin County. Its importance in that function has been reduced in recent years due to the introduction of Interstate 94 and the upgrading of U.S. (TH) 52. However, Brooklyn Boulevard remains an important element in the continued development of Brooklyn Center. Its ability to carry a great number of vehicles per day while allowing ease of access to land parcels and local streets along its route makes the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor a desirable location for a variety of retail, service, and multiple - family residential land uses. This fact has increased the pressures from commercial interests for development of available land along the boulevard. The City of Brooklyn Center realizes the opportunities and potential pit- falls which are presented by this situation. It desires to see the roadway continue to function smoothly in its capacity as a traffic artery and it also wishes to promote physical development in the corridor which serves the best interests of the City of Brooklyn Center. A comprehensive urban design and development plan is required to promote the achievement of these dual objectives There is a growing demand to establish individual retail or service facili- ties at every available location along Brooklyn Boulevard between State Highway (TH) 100 and the northern Brooklyn Center city limits. Unguided Y Y 9 commercial development could result in such a great number of access /egress points along the boulevard that its traffic flow could become seriously impeded, particularly during the afternoon peak period (4:00 -6 :00 PM). In addition, a highly linear pattern of commercial facilities, each with its own building and freestanding sign, could develop an unsightly "strip commercial" appearance. In response to these potential opportunities and problems, this study of the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor has been included as an element of the City of Brooklyn Center Comprehensive Plan The study consists of the following elements: s • an inventory and analysis of the existing physical features of the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor 139 r • an analysis of the existing developmental pattern of the corridor • an inventory and analysis of the existing and projected traffic movement capabilities of Brooklyn Boulevard • the formulation of four alternative conceptual development plans for the corridor • the recommendation of a single conceptual development pattern for the corridor • a discussion of steps which the City of Brooklyn Center should take to improve the appearance and function of this important and highly imaginable traffic corridor. 140 Existing Corridor Development Pattern EXISTING LAND USE AND VISUAL IMAGE The Brooklyn Boulevard corridor contains a combination of single - family homes, a limited number of mid - density residential uses, a high intensity of retail development and low intensity service and office uses. For many years, the principal locus of commercial activity was located at the inter- section of the, then, Osseo Road and 69th Avenue north, the site of the first general store and post office in Brooklyn Township. Since that time, many single - family homes have been constructed along the length of the corridor, although many land parcels were not utilized for this purpose. A variety of large and small retail, service, office, and mid - density resi- dential developments have been constructed in the last two decades on all but a very few of the remaining sites in the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor. In this manner certain segments of the corridor have acquired a distinctly residential nature while others are dominated by retail or service uses. Particular areas are not clearly defined as to their predominant use, and remain in a state of evolution. Chief among these weakly defined areas is the segment of ' the corridor located between the Brookda le Shopping Center and Interstate 94. Figure 18, "Existing Developmental Concept," illustrates the general pat- tern of development in the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor as it appears today. The corridor has been divided into subareas according to homogenous land uses or a perceived theme. Notes describe the general nature of each subarea and point out particularly interesting physical development features. Figure 19, "Existing Corridor Conditions," portrays in detail the type of land use on each parcel, the actual name of each business, and the exterior physical condition of each structure as derived from a windshield survey conducted in Spring, 1978. The most northerly and southerly segments of the corridor are occupied by residential neighborhoods which frame the remainder of Brooklyn Boulevard. The physical housing conditions in both of these areas are good. However, as with most of the single - family homes located along Brooklyn Boulevard, there is no service road, and driveways access on- street directly. The northerly area is the location of a recently developed townhouse project. Additional undeveloped land designated residential also exists on the oppo- site side of the boulevard near 71st Avenue. 141 0 Fi 1e �� � � AUIO Dealer • Low Inlensdy Land Use Fast Food Reslaurents e MalOr Naw TOwnEOUSB TRANSITIONAL ZONE �`�'" �- �GI o0mant • MIXED RESIDENTIAL AND e +1 ?•� V COMMERCIAL USES 1 • UNCERTAIN IDENTITY K ) STABLE RESIDENTIAL A ` • DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL I ARE WITH PONTI TEAL {- •—�- 111 ,� i .�. �T ` , 1 rI FOR ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT I S F F �j II ADII •k" I � AOarlmenl COmpleK M i � Prme Devatoomenl S la I ,� wo I f S Ma o. 10 la.S _ l.�'/ wesilnsae f t I Easl Artery L l } - I I I �! � •' .ae � + -... t r STABLE Low INTENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT M 9TH Avenue 1 Ma or rvorm 5 da East west Artery BUFFERED BY GE I ROAD AND ISLAND � �{ •U1L � / / R sYl F • COMMUNITY PETAL /SERVICE NODE T t COMMUN RETAIL —� T — ' 1 �}( / AUTO a SERVICE AREA ELATED �, r S ../ �1 _ •LOW NTENS TV REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER POOR BUILD NG CONDITION MAJOR TRIP ATTRACTION yyI r c[ • * REDEV ELGPMENT POT -NTIAL ONTHPORT •/ H I NTENSITY DEVELOPMENT ink AUTO RELATED USAGE LOW INTENSITY LAND USE p,L \ , Existing `✓ H ,Do Developmental _ • Ma pr S o - If - I >✓� �'� aLp pse Concept - y \ UNDEVELOPED LAND �- r LAND OF HIGH REDEVELOPMENT - POTENTIAL - i INTENSITY OF VEHICULAR CIRCULATION l � •MiorOrgnanCDesln� ton/ �� l � i ,� d ��.n ward T,a I� �; ' �`• "� � .: °`� - _.__, � Nwa, Bwce � �•,+. / / I `Make Gpod Mglw' LMerelOpad law land / /,' Boilers STABLE APPROPRIATE � i / "; '1 Apartment GOrrpen > _. •S +~ S� f RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT sea A Scrod '. -- RESIDENT MEDxxn wTENS TY �. / ��l[f. �� /i .er.,e ^; • Rmcpal CoMecld Sheet L / { v� 2aYres DQ-1 Slae ; i r S� Hee. mdusvy r I Comprehensive Plan — Brooklyn Boulevard Study s - FKue 19 t Brooklyn elva. cnrowacuc CnrY r P vmoum P.B.C. Mad cal Denial �. Artnpr Tredcbers F antl Gh,ps t.w0o< 1 ..erwin a -IM ?�' r ;a� Burger K ng -`�+�• ` 3 t ? Slargartl Gas Stal on Cerbone's Pizze e ..v�li1C -.°4� l YWli-- 1 -,� -�L EvansiJONV Fureral Hone � 7 � t�; d J Gory CenlerarOOk Gtices \ � Crc•s o — U~" 61-0. Met 1-1 Cnurcn L� tern GnG,­ Br � 1 ..{ d � / oodnaven Denaa Assoc.- on _ S!aie y T Farm ns DullJ ServKe t j 3�. Wesbrppk Mal -- -- /Coot nenla Sgn j.�'�� :bib \ • Bropkpa A su Am. Leg on Post t -' 41 r r a y OK Stang Co StereO LltlYf i4e {� ��.. -{�;� Smal StwDO rg Center Tre Saes - a il Nat onal eeaulY SWDNes ;I Dayt«s �� aigr Ceaners L 0 . T O ,.er scounl Bakery 6 5 S aj Gas Sle rY Leonartl Bropkl C Coun ��� I \ Hennep n Federal Moo Sery c S t pn � BB Wn ­. Stone F rst Brook Gale Bank _ '� C % lei Snpp NQRTitPpia� }� 1 Poppn Fresn V S.ar Dodge COm i,c ary J �`-_ 4 d Mtlwest Fetleral 9rookda a Pont ac Oltlstpwn U.SA < Lem n area Restauranl A— Pa nl a d G ass i_ f . ,, q'\ •I� Happy .,,g Restauranl Rockwel Power loo Center T jS. McDOna tls Restaurant Servom n Tw Glas 39^.Si e Faneus <e cream Iren enavrn et --- .,�, an a , Kentucky F, etl Cn cken N Gar Was° — ,eatpne C , ­ Existing y� � /Co—, Sfore FpotlS F +-- - / \ r �r- Existing Corridor a a':, t Conditions a r 1 um Ck v RESIDENTIAL LAND USE I x aT � y Gacc ew w p � SINGLE - FAMILY DETACHED Oo Gale Covenant C °urc° 1 —� � - 2.3 zntl a UNITS i I � / � zarro snppc da- �ast ` Grr ualmborg s Greennouse anG Carden Cen er ,_ „ `� - 1 TOWNHOUSES / •” d . MULTI- FAMILY � i 1 �J �_�L+ai� dhryp� �' ' U .- �_ F.e Sla lron C Snell Sery arG ce Sl S �+Kmdl Lc ems!' r NON LAND USE /�'� Maknbor9 a Greenhouse ao ev Center >y r I ,.} d RETAIL • GtC A— Pa z Lj -� L tj OFFICE; SERVICE •DU ng Oo1 ca d 6 Twn L—II A-— • Taco rgw�e R uranN I � WDUSTRIAL •SOec al S�xeS p A PUBLIC (' # D and B stuns cdaners r 3 r` �1 - Bas e eM Marxsl � SEMI - PUBLIC Br tlgemans Cj = 'r PARKS eM OPEN SPACE T e Inc. Best UNDEVELOPED \ Bel Fert N[er „• PHYSICAL DETERIORATION SOUND 0 MINOR DETERIORATION MAJOR DETERIORATION Comprehensive Plan— Brooklyn Boulevard Study At the southern city limits Howe Fertilizer, Inc., occupies a site which abuts Brooklyn Boulevard. Howe Fertilizer, Inc. has conducted business from this location for several decades but the operation exists now under a Special Use Permit of the City Zoning Ordinance. At the intersection of Brooklyn Boulevard and 69th Avenue north is located a community - related service area. This location appears to hold a high potential for redevelopment to a more intense level of economic activity. This judgement is based upon the amount of traffic which crosses the inter- section and the low intensity nature of the present development. The exterior physical conditions of the small, one -story structures in this area are poor, off - street parking is limited, and several land parcels appear to be underutilized. Immediately south of this community service area, three automobile dealers and a few, minor auto - related commercial developments are located. Although the use intensity of most of the land in this area is rather low, the buildings themselves are in good condition and business appears to be strong. This is a prime site for this type of commercial activity due to its good visibility from Interstate 94 and easy access from Brooklyn Boulevard. To the south of Interstate 94, extending to 58th Avenue, is a mixed area of retail, service, office, low- and mid - density residential uses, a church, and public school. This area is indicated on Figure 18, "Existing Developmental Pattern" as a Transitional Zone. This segment of Brooklyn Boulevard has the least strongly defined image and character of any segment of the corridor. Several residential neighborhoods abut the boulevard at this location. However, numerous commercial uses have located in this area recently, including convenience food restaurants, a mortuary, professional office buildings, a gasoline service station, and an auto dealer. These uses are, unfortunately, closely intermixed with the residential uses along the boulevard. The danger exists that this segment of the corridor, particularly that por- tion south of 63rd Avenue, may evolve from a residential area with a shopping node at 63rd Avenue into a commercial "strip". At the southwest corner of 63rd Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard a functional, integrated collection of shops exists. On the opposite side of the boulevard, how- ever, the commercial developments are establishing themselves in a linear pattern which is not nearly as functional or aesthetically appealing. The commercial utilization of several undeveloped parcels near 59th Avenue and several residential parcels now squeezed between non - residential uses could complete this evolutionary process between 58th and 62nd Avenues. While commercial development along Brooklyn Boulevard between State Highway (TH) 100 and Interstate 94 may not be deleterious to the corridor's image or function, there are certain characteristics of a linear pattern of inde- pendently developed, auto- oriented commercial uses which may cause problems. These include: 0 individual points of access and egress to the street from each development 147 • individual free- standjr = competing signs for each development • negative impacts on -e of nearby residential land uses, par- ticularly if the property does not receive sufficient buffering from the c ^ru.r, ,�_ area and is not located in a position for potent redeveIr,;,m.nr `o a commerc use. Proceeding further south along ~­e corridor from 58th Avenue, there is a well planned collection of and retail uses between Brooklyn Boulevard and Xerxes Avenue. Thew offices, shops, and restaurants have developed in response to the traffic drawn by Brookdale Shopping Center, immediately to the east. Traffic circulation in this area is handled smoothly by the system of feeder roads serving Brooklyn Boulevard. The buildings' architecture is generally pleasing, setbacks and buffering are adequate, parking is adequate, and the land is well utilized. Across Brooklyn Boulevard from this commercial location is a neighborhood of single- family homes set well back from the boulevard by the presence of a service road and a generous median. The homes are in good physical con- dition and are protected from the traffic of Brooklyn Boulevard by their setback and indirect access to that road. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION Traffic movement at the present time on Brooklyn Boulevard presents no significant problems. Average daily traffic is within the design limits of the roadway, and, although traffic levels increase considerably at peak hours, waiting periods at traffic signals are not inordinately long. There is some justifiable concern, however, over the impact which increased num- bers of curb cuts and left turn maneuvers could have on traffic flow. The increased peak hour occurrence of turning movements and roadway access demands does inhibit smooth traffic at these times of day. Fortunately the number of average daily and peak hour vehicles is not expected to increase significantly over the next 20 years. But attention must still be paid to the effect .which redevelopment within the corridor could have on local traffic movement. The Hennepin County Department of Transportation estimated in 1977 that the level of annual average daily traffic level on Brooklyn Boulevard north of State Highway (TH) 100 decreased to approximately 11,500 vehicles as indi- cated in Figure 20, "Existing Vehicular Circulation.' In that same year peak hour traffic volume was measured and determined to be: AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 55th Avenue 1959 Vehicles 2605 Vehicles 65th Avenue 1973 Vehicles 1781 Vehicles 71st Avenue 1745 Vehicles 2498 Vehicles 148 Fgure 20 fit, �•5M + ` �= :- NORTH T t m Y - ' •� // [ Existing Vehicular �. Circulation�.��; ✓i / t AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (1978) a f i PEAK HOUR VOLUME (1978) � i �• �r BUS ROUTES 711 < � a + (D BUS STOPS – lr �i t1l Snererea �eencn � - y OFF- STREET PARKING � r d .I TURNING LANES PROVIDED A ! JAI T TRAFFIC SEMAPHORES...— r j1 r7 Comprehensive Plan — Brooklyn Boulevard Study r Estimates for the year 2000 indicates that traffic volumes on Brooklyn Boulevard should increase by approximately 10 %. The average daily volume north of State Highway (TH) 100 should be approximately 27,000 vehicles, and south of State Highway (TH) 100 approximately 14,000 vehicles. Peak hour volume should experience a similarly modest increase. The reasons that only modest traffic volume increases are forecast for Brooklyn Boulevard include the proposed upgrading of State Highway (TH) 252, for- merly U.S. 169, currently in the planning stages, during the 1980's and Interstate 94 between Interstate 694 and downtown Minneapolis, will also be completed during that decade. These facilities will serve to reduce traf- fic volumes, particularly peak hour traffic, from Brooklyn Boulevard. 151 I Alternative Development Concepts Four alternative concepts of possible physical development have been for - mulated in order to portray the range of courses which the City of Brooklyn Center could pursue in the continued development and redevelopment of land within the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor. These concepts are indicated in Figures 21 -24, "Alternate Concepts A -D." From the four concepts will be developed a recommended conceptual development plan. The graphic represen- tation of the various land use configurations is schematically indicated to permit interpretation and refinement by City staff according to individual circumstances. The four development concepts are described below. ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT A The first concept as indicated in Figure 21, "Alternative Concept A," is quite similar to the existing pattern of development along the corridor. Rather than suggesting any significant changes in land use, Alternative Concept A utilizes the present development pattern and strengthens the collection of service businesses near 69th Avenue, the retail businesses near 63rd Avenue, and the service businesses located along the east side of the boulevard between 62nd and 59th Avenues. Alternative Concept A recom- mends that mid - density housing be utilized when developing or redeveloping land parcels in two existing residential areas: between 70th Avenue and Shingle Creek and between the 63rd Avenue retail area and Interstate 94. As in each of the concepts presented, Alternative Concept A recommends the development of a major office complex on the vacant land northeast of the 58th Avenue /Brooklyn Boulevard intersection. ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT B The second concept as indicated in Figure 22, "Alternative Concept B," differs from the first in two principal ways. Alternative Concept B pro- poses a transition from primarily service to primarily retail land uses in the community commercial development area surrounding the 69th Avenue intersection. This shift would likely increase the traffic generated by businesses in this area, require additional off - street parking, and induce the redevelopment of the immediately adjacent, existing single - family homes. No enlargement in size of this commercial location is suggested by Alternative Concept B , however. P Secondly, Alternative Concept B recommends an increase in residential densities west of Brooklyn Boulevard between 58th Avenue and 62nd Avenue. This change is recommended in response to existing mid - density housing in this area and the perceived redevelopment possibilities for this area. 152 Fic,7.ire 21 L 1l. I STRENGTHEN DEVELOPING LINEAR -A SERVICE /OFFICE PATTERN I �] 1 \1 _ L ENICGRAGE IHD-CENS+TY FSCCE11Al ENGWRAGE MAJOR OFFICE DEVELOP-IT OL I N FILL DEVELOPMENT ANG F JE`.'ELOPMENT { r,. LE E OPCIF t SEP,c,NODE MAINTAIN Ex STING _ RETAIL/ SERVICE AREAS R T $ ' AE LONG T +M CON TNUAi ON OF C Tu J T RELATED CC-ILIFOAL USES 4� �:k Alternative ail` �ai 4 rir Concept = A LOW - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - F - Yt MID - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SERVICE RETAIL INDUSTRIAL EXISTING OF1,IG P°ESERVE Ex I Sn L.1 1ENS iY e� AUTO RELATED SF RVICE * ` -S N E E 05 PFINFORCE EXISTING GOM _NITY * COMMERCIAL USES Comrrohensvi, Eoulevarcl St L, I d v 0 111 Figure 22 i ENCOLRACE FEER DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELCMENi / y � REDEVELOPtENT r ALLOW WANSITION PRpA SERVICE TO RETAIL NODE ' NORT PORT tss NOTE f — PAR!( � , TI-E RE!. +AMBER OF CPNt,EPTiJPL DEVELOFLA NT PATTERN 'S' IS THE SANE AS SHOWN _ Y WALTERNAT VE'A Y _. Alternative Concept - LOW - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL •1 , /� Q MID- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL a SERVICE /A'F Lj RETAIL INDUSTRIAL y- stwoo�t we ' tr Af r E ; ` •• o o t / Ir + _y i —, - i i A J L Comprehensive Plan — Brooklyn Boulevard Study aicmv ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT C The third concept as indicated in Figure 23, "Alternative Concept C," pro- poses the development of a third retail "node" along the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor in addition to those which presently exist at the Brookdale Shopping Center and around the 63rd Avenue intersection. This third retail area would extend along Brooklyn Boulevard from Interstate 94 to just beyond 69th Avenue. The redevelopment to a much more intense use of the land now occupied by the three auto dealers is envisioned in this scheme. Also proposed in Alternative Concept C is the evolution from a community commercial "strip" to a mid - density residential area of that land east of Brooklyn Boulevard between 58th and 63rd Avenues. This change would more sharply define the commercial areas of the Brookdale Shopping Center and Boulevard Center /Zayre's Shopper's City complex. The overall effect of these two changes would be to concentrate commercial land uses into development patterns which are less linear in form, more compact, and more clearly separated from nearby residential uses. ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT D The fourth concept as indicated in Figure 24, "Alternative Concept D," proposes the enlargement of the community retail area at 63rd Avenue to include the land now underutilized by the automobile dealership immediately south of Boulevard Center. This strengthened retail center would be separated from the Brookdale Shopping Center complex by the development within the corridor of mid - density housing on both sides of Brooklyn Boulevard. Commercial areas north of Interstate 94 would retain their pre- sent characteristics of community service use and auto - related commercial use. Features of this concept include: • the continuation of the retail and service uses in an around the Brookdale Shopping Center • the preservation of existing, low- density, single - family neigh- borhoods south of State Highway (TH) 100 as well as west and north- west of the Brookdale Shopping Center • the continued use of the Howe Fertilizer, Inc., site as industrial land • the intensive development as an office use of the vacant land northeast of the 58th Avenue intersection • the completion of the service /office pattern east of the boulevard between 58th Avenue and 63rd Avenue • the reinforcement of existing commercial developments near 63rd Avenue and 69th Avenue 157 ` Figure 23 �I L A I l -PROMOTE EVOLUTION FROM y SERVICE STRIP TO MID - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL •SHARPLY DEFINE COMMERCIAL _ VS, RESIDENTIAL AREAS T ,.. I �i Cw00� ENCOURAGE MID- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ENCC —AGE MAJOR OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ( ' IN - FILL DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPAENT 1 / DEVELOP THIRD RETAIL NODE H PLAN FOR TRANS ITION TO MAINTAIN EXISTING MORE INTENSE RETAIL CENTER [ / 1 RETAIL /SERVICE AREAS 'ORTH ORT ( _ PAgM 1 ASStNAE LONG TERM CONTINUATION OF 4 AUTO RELATED COMMERCIAL USES d .,�. Alternative 1 Concept = -- 1 F LOW— DENSITY RESIDENTIAL U MID — DENSITY RESIDENTIAL I SERVICE "�� L r �'I • RETAIL . ® INDUSTRIAL PRESERVE EXISTING LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS 1 I , I REINFORCE EXISTING COMMLNTY COMMERCIAL USES NODE _ a CONTINUE INDUSTRIAL LAND USE Comprehensive Plan — Brooklyn Boulevard Study �ccc;u� i Figure 24 y oA I �` j• -ENCOURAGE MID-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL _ •\B tY 1 DEt ELOPMENT ON BOTH SIDES } OE PRLY DELINEATE .. 1, � CLEARLY OELINEAtE REiaL NODES I� { 1\ �i A f 'eat a �t NORiHRORT /FF R Alternative Concept LOW -DENSITY AESIDEN TIAL 1 MID- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL l � © SERVICE '^�-• ` ''� RETAIL t i t I 1 L - �- t I ® INDUSTRIAL I n A•, �3 � I / A`' anti :� }ry1 NN E%ARGE. RENFORCE E%ISTNG M t COMMUN TY RETAIL CENTER FE � I fl .,�.I n -J �( _ f�� I .. •/'\. . t 'j�. Comprehensive Plan— Brooklyn Boulevard Study • the continuation of auto - related commercial uses immediately north of Interstate 94 • the development and redevelopment north of 70th Avenue and south of State Highway (TH) 100 using mid - density housing (e.g. townhouses, duplexes, and quadruplexes). • the construction of the auto dealers just north of Interstate 94. RECOMMENDED CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVE Land Use The recommended Conceptual Alternative for the continued evolution of the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor recognizes the constraints which certain existing developments have placed upon the City's options for change within the corridor. Working within these parameters, the Recommended Conceptual Alternative attempts to strike a reasonable balance between the status quo shown in Conceptual Alternative A and the close -to -ideal situation portrayed by Conceptual Alternative C. This option was designed with the following objectives in mind: • to contain commercial land uses within clearly defined sectors of the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor; propose means of preventing the evolution of a "strip" of retail and service businesses from State Highway (TH) 100 to the northern City boundary • to preserve the smooth traffic flow along Brooklyn Boulevard • to protect adjacent residential neighborhoods from undue negative environmental influences generated by development along Brooklyn Boulevard • to minimize disruption during redevelopment to the residential character of areas along Brooklyn Boulevard which are recommended to remain residential • to provide an adequate amount of land designated for commercial use within the corridor to meet reasonable future community needs for goods and services • to enhance the image and appearance of the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor. The resultant plan is indicated in Figure 25, "Recommended Conceptual Alternative." Three principal retail nodes are recommended by this alternative: Brookdale Shopping Center, the 63rd Avenue area, and the 69th Avenue area. The latter two represent expansions of existing commercial developments. Land presently being utilized by single- family homes is recommended for redevelopment into new or more intense retail land uses. 163 Fire 25 •STRENGTHEN SERVICE /OFFICE PATTERN o� i w !ENCOURAGE OFFICE USES " « -STRIVE FOR HARMONIOUS ARCHITECTURE AND SITE DESK?! V -ALLOW TRANSITION TO LOW-DENSITY ' k �� i OFFICE PATTERN r� -�J PROMOTE MAJOR OFFICE COMPLEX I 4 -A LOW EVOLUTION TO LOW DENSITY L e OFFICE PATTERN _N SITE HARMONIOUS ARCHTECTURE AND D SITE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT N MRDE RESGEVELOPMENNT NFiL MAINTAINE%STNG RETA._ rv" DEVELOMET A,•D REDENT y SERV'IGE DEVELOPMENT -UPGRADE ENLARGE E %ISTING �,. COMMERCIAL NODE EMPHASIZE RETAIL BUSINESSES i �v I 4 Recommended = Conceptual •, Alternative ASSUME LONG -TERM � ' - r CONTINUATION OF AUTO- - RELATED COMMERCIAL USES ' \ T i L- `�. LOW - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL `✓ l - Y r� A � MID - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL A SERVICE /OFFICE t j RETAIL / ® INDUSTRIAL � � ' PRESERVE E %S TING LO'N-DEN$TY I t RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD AUTO RELATED SERVICE •ENLARGE. REINFORCE EXISTING COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL ODE + j •PROMOTE HIGH INtEN51TY RETAIL U.I. CONTIN J* WOUSTRIAL LAND USE j I t Comprehensive Plan —Brooklyn Boulevard Study NMI �� Office buildings are recommended for development along Brooklyn Boulevard in three locations: (1) immediately west of the Brookdale Shopping Center between State Highway (TH) 100 and 58th Avenues, (2) the eastern side of the corridor between 58th and 62nd Avenues and (3) the western s i d e of the corridor between 58th and 62nd Avenues. The recommendation for the former area is designed to complement retail uses in the Brookdale Shopping Center complex. The second area's recommendation is in to established service /office developments in that location. Were it not for this devel- opmental precedent, a medium density residential land use would probably have been suggested for the 58th to 62nd Avenue area in order to complement the low -to- medium density residential development across Brooklyn Boulevard and more clearly demarcate the commercial land uses located both to the north and to the south of that location within the corridor. The service/ office recommendation for the western side of the Brooklyn Boulevard corri- dor between 58th and 62nd Avenues acknowledges the pressures for commercial development which will be placed on this location by such land uses across Brooklyn Boulevard. It is further recommended that several well defined residential locations be preserved and intensified along the corridor. Figure 25, "Recommended Conceptual Alternative," indicates these residential locations. The nature of their future uses should follow these guidelines: • The most southerly of these residential areas should retain its existing low- density character. • The residential area immediately south of Interstate 94 and that area north of 70th Avenue should receive infill development and redevelopment with medium - density housing. Commercial uses should not be allowed to stray into these residential enclaves and detract from the character which is being sought. As in the preceding alternatives, a major office complex is recommended for the northeast corner of the 58th Avenue intersection and no alteration is necessitated in the foreseeable future for the Brookdale Shopping Center area. It is assumed that the automobile dealers will desire to retain their present cluster just north of Interstate 94. Finally, industrial land uses should be sustained at the southernmost tip of the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor and also adjacent to Iten Chevrolet just north of Interstate 94. 167 Special Development Considerations Along most sections of the corridor, the development or redevelopment of new residential, retail, service, or office facilities will present little or no difficulty. For example, the transition from a single - family resi- dential to an office land use between 55th and 58th Avenues will not cause traffic problems for Brooklyn Boulevard due to the presence of a frontage road. Also, office development may be separated from that area's residen- tial neighborhood by Northport Drive. In other instances, development of a nature similar to that recommended (either commercial or residential) may already exist, access to the site may be accomplished by the use of local streets without creating excessive impact upon nearby homes, and /or current land parcelization may dictate the minimum size of a site which will be acquired for development. However, the evolution of the land along Brooklyn Boulevard between 58th Avenue and Halifax Drive presents some difficulties. The following questions arise when considering office or mid - density residential develop- ment in this location: • How can the impact upon Brooklyn Boulevard's traffic movement be minimized? • To what distance away from Brooklyn Boulevard should land be zoned for service /office development? • If new office development abuts both Brooklyn Boulevard and a local street to the rear, should access to this development be allowed via the local street? • How can aesthetically pleasing scale and design of service /office development be encouraged? • Are office buildings or mid - density housing the better development option? • Are townhouses the preferred mid - density housing type? To explore these issues further, a larger scale map of that portion of the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor between 58th Avenue and Halifax Drive (termed the Focus Area) was developed which included building outlines, property lines, and curb lines. Land parcels likely to experience redevelopment in the foreseeable future were identified. Prototypical office site plans were designed based upon a building floor area and front yard setback considered to be the minimum acceptable for this location. The office site 168 plans were superimposed on the areas considered for redevelopment to deter- mine the depth of parcels from Brooklyn Boulevard which should be designated a C -2 Zoning Classification. These office site plans have either a minimum lot width of 150 feet (to accommodate two double - loaded parking bays plus the minimum side yard set- back requirements of 10 feet) or a minimum lot depth of 180 feet (so as to accommodate two double - loaded parking bays plus the absolute minimum front yard setback of 35 feet of landscaped area. It should be emphasized that these site plans illustrate the minimum feasible designs for office devel- opment. If the full 50 foot front setback is utilized (as presently required by the Zoning Ordinance for commercial developments along major thoroughfares) the office developments would either have to be of a smaller f l oor area, developed as one building rather than two adjacent buildings, l d i n s J 9 , or developed p on larger land tracts. This final option would require that the second row of lot depth from Brooklyn Boulevard be zoned for service / P office use. The only locations within the Focus Area where this option resents itself p sel are west of the bouely and at 58th Avenue and immediately north of 61st Avenue as indicated in Figure 26 "Office Develo Development." 9 , P Other locations are either only one lot deep to the first local street or require the depth of two lots to accommodate what should be considered the minimal scale of development. If mid- density housing is chosen as a land use option for any locations in the Focus Area along the west side of Brooklyn Boulevard, townhouses should be the maximum density sought to maintain compatible building scale and to encourage planned unit development (PUD) site planning criteria. When estimating the minimum size of a tract needed for the development of townhouses, it is noted that such developments usually require a minimum of 15 dwelling units becasue of the fixed costs associated with new townhouse development. Since the Zoning Ordinance stipulates that a maximum of 8 dwelling units may be constructed per gross acre of land, tracts of at least 1.86 acres would be required. The locations within the Focus Area which would accommodate townhouse development are indicated by Figure 27, "Mid- Density Residential Development." Interference with traffic movement on Brooklyn Boulevard may be reduced by amending the City Zoning Ordinance to require minimum lot widths in the C -1 Zoning Classification of at least 150 feet when such a use fronts on a major thoroughfare (such as Brooklyn Boulevard). Whenever possible, adja- cent independent development should construct shared access drives. When a development abuts a local street which is perpendicular to Brooklyn Boulevard access to that tract should be via the local , a street. If the City of Brooklyn Center determines that a median with shared left turn lanes should be placed in Brooklyn Boulevard to minimize turning movements, no more than one break per block should be made in this facility. Such arrangements would allow Brooklyn Boulevard to continue to function ade- quately as a traffic artery. The use of a frontage road or turning lanes on the perimeter of Brooklyn Boulevard were considered in this regard. Such facilities would undoubtedly aid traffic movement, however, they may not be necessary and would require the acquisition of substantial land. 169 r Figure 26 F � G G — i _J 61st AVE. �F+ I V � C 0.00 SC1 R. 15.WO SO. R o 9600 so. R 63rd _ (� T a-6 FT. 1 I I 1 r Office Development 62�d A VE o . 12000 SO. R. +I AVE- Comprehensive Plan— Brooklyn Boulevard Study Fire 27 O 7 �L> ❑ O I � , O- r� I U 3 ACRES o I � z. GNTS B DU /ACRE 3AGRE5 a 63rd ZA UNITS -- e CU /ACRE I ^ 6- Av a 3 3 < I ' vE : 5 ACRES r� \ 62. AVE Mid- Density -- - - Residential -- ❑ Development 16 w A. re rs 1 W /A(:RE ' 6t1i AvE� �w r' 581h C �' ❑ /oo zao wv .00 .. �❑��` � � OO OO ���[� ���C�Q CIS I _ 'I', !�ii�llllll'','.'.I �ilillll — Comprehensive Plan— Brooklyn Boulevard Study GIMW In summary, there appears to be three basic options available to the City of Brooklyn Center regarding future development and redevelopment within the Focus Area, including: 1. Do nothing, in which case, a building, parking lot, freestanding sign, and ac drive conceivably occur ever 70 feet. The access could conceiva 9 Y Y result could be a pattern of undesireable construction which might well require public action to correct at a later date. 2. Amend the Zoning Ordinance to require a minimum l ong width i n the C -1 Zoning Classification of 150 feet and a minimum lot size of 1 acre when the land parcel will be developed with direct access to a collector or arterial level street (such as Brooklyn Boulevard or 69th Avenue). Property should be zoned for either service /office or townhouse development according to the pattern shown in Figures 15 and 25, "Land Use Plan Revisions" and "Recommended Conceptual Alternative." 3. Acquire the critical tracts of land and "bank" them so that the City of Brooklyn Center may exercise maximum development control over the nature and scale of redevelopment. This option would have the greatest monetary and potential political costs of the three presented. 175 Recommended Public and Private Improvements and Controls A number of physical improvements are recommended to be implemented along Brooklyn Boulevard by the City of Brooklyn Center and private landowners. These recommendations are intended to help achieve a more functional and aesthetically appealing roadway corridor, as indicated in Figure 28, "Public and Private Boulevard Improvements and Control." These recommendations are derived from an analysis and projection of traf- fic volumes along Brooklyn Boulevard and an examination of current and projected traffic movement patterns at specific locations. The Recommended Conceptual Alternative was analyzed to estimate the amount of additional traffic which would likely be generated by new retail, service, and resi- dential development. General traffic operation improvements noted below were formulated to support and assist new development within the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor, to protect the traffic capacity of Brooklyn Boulevard, and to maintain safe and efficient traffic flow conditions. Although detailed traffic studies should be made in response to specific development proposals, the recommendations presented below are given as general indica- tions of the nature which actual improvements might assume. Other Brooklyn Boulevard recommendations relating to lighting and landscaping are made upon a visual inspection and analysis of the corridor throughout the day. The visual effect on automobile drivers and pedestrians of the roadway and its attendant development was considered. In addition, an objective was established that these improvements should complement and reinforce the suggested development pattern of the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor. TRAFFIC OPERATION IMPROVEMENTS In general, Brooklyn Boulevard appears capable of handling the relatively modest increases in traffic volumes anticipated for it. No additional traffic movement lanes should be required. There are concerns, however, which relate to five specific locations along the boulevard. The locations were noted in Figure 25, "Recommended Conceptual Alternative," as being sites of suggested new development and /or redevelopment. These five areas and their recommended traffic operation improvements are: 1. The 69th Avenue Retail Area • Wherever possible, access to areas of commercial development should be via local streets. • Direct access to Brooklyn Boulevard from commercial developments should not be allowed. Where no other alternative is available, access should be limited to right turns in and right turns out. 176 -4 Figure 28 1 _ FUTURE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS "•° '�°" a IMPROVEMENTS: • NSTALL MEDIANS X t!/ i ALLOW ACCESS ONLY VIA ''� "• !��..'.��, I I SIDE STREETS RELOCATE ALL OVERHEAD WIRING y BELOW GRADE ALONG ENTIRE i I LENGTH OF BOULEVARD INSTITUTE LOW- INTEREST LOAN PROGRAM TO ASSIST LANDSCAPING }� •' J OF PRIVATELY OWNED SETBACK � .--�-� PROPERTY ALONG ENTIRE LENGTH OF�� BOULEVARD EMPHASIZE USAGE OF I zi• I \�' -` • CONIFEROUS PLANT MATERIALS FUTURE TRAFFIC O PERATION S '� • + ( IMPROVEMENTS T O SU PPORT �}^ A:STALL TRAFFIC MEDA FI NSL ACTIVITY: IN -' POSSIBLE ROADWAY wOENwG + , F 44 '�. I Y ! :._ • ' 2- --y� -MULTI PHASE TRAFFIC SGNALS ✓ �. ��''k i % r T �" \ j SPECIAL EMPHASIS STREET LIGHTM G 1 f VORT pAT • l • REL RESIDENTIAL SEGMENTS Of PAkN �} ' SPECIAL EMPHASIS STREET LIGHTING I \/ BL D AIT. LO' ER INTEIS F *TJRES \� LCHT ALB E' <'c CAL EMPHAS T Public and Private • PING N T E GGMMER AREAS LANDSCAPE TRAFFC 1 Boulevard _ MEDIANS WTH HGH L c " ERANT PLANT MATERIAL • ''� Improvements m �provel I m dents and Controls �= SPECIAL EMPHASIS LIGHTING T tT -z+-. -i COMMERCIAL AREAS -.•�` 3 j •.,, RESIDENTIAL RELIGHTING 555 r �� t• i LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS AND BUFFERS r' - - TRAFFIC OPERATIONS IMPROVEMENTS y ' \ 7 i FUTURE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS .1 / IMPROVEMENTS TO SUPPORT ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL •/ Y �� L VI ACT TY. RESTRICT , CONTROL DIRECT } ACCESS TO BOULEVARD E dj ,T •RALIGN ZAVRE'$ SHOPPER'S CITY .6' i t *PUBLI CONTROLS. f I NS P REC NDCD AMENDMENTS " � 5 ,• I CY L 5 RIN GN O D RDN N y SPE f CIAL EMPHASIS -Z Nt. PRn,PI I>�" STREET LIGHTING Ma REQUEST OF 0 .R �(, ACHIEVE •• URBAN DESIGN O' LI,,ES x III •._...�L , � ��IIv�� ���( I' � /�` / /� i �� ��Ir i ,� I rJ: .�1�J � .. Comprehensive Plan— Brooklyn BOU9evard Study • A median should be constructed to channel traffic flow through the area and to eliminate left turns except at intersections. • Consideration should be given to upgrading the intersection of Brooklyn Boulevard and 69th Avenue to provide five lanes (two traf- fic lanes in each direction and a shared left turn lane) and multi- phase traffic signal control. • Future studies may indicate that signalization may also be required at either or both of the intersections of 68th Avenue and 70th Avenue with Brooklyn Boulevard. 2. Halifax Drive to Interstate 94 Mid - Density Residential Area • Adequate access capacity to both existing and proposed residential development can probably be provided via existing cross streets (Halifax Drive and 65th Avenue). • As redevelopment occurs, driveways which directly access Brooklyn Boulevard should be eliminated. • Intersections should be studied periodically to see whether signali- zation is warranted. 3. The 63rd Avenue Retail Area The existing and potential retail businesses in this location will generate significant amounts of traffic. As part of the planning pro- cess leading to redevelopment, consideration must be given to the increased trip generation that conversion to intense retail uses will cause. These recommendations are made as guidelines for traffic control: • Restrict direct access to Brooklyn Boulevard to locations where no reasonable alternative is available. • As recommended retail areas south of Zayre's Shopper's City are developed, locate the Shopper's City /Brooklyn Boulevard driveway opposite Halifax Drive. Align the Shopper's City /63rd Avenue driveway with the access point to the retail area south of 63rd Avenue. • Signalization in this area should be coordinated with activities at the fire station so that emergency vehicles can leave the station area quickly and safely. • The installation of medians in this area should be considered as redevelopment occurs so that travel paths are clearly defined and undesirable vehicle movements are eliminated. 4. 58th Avenue to 61st /62nd Avenues. • Brooklyn Boulevard should be channelized in order to provide smooth traffic flow. 179 • No direct access to Brooklyn Boulevard should be allowed. Access should be provided via cross streets. • In conjunction with development along both sides of Brooklyn Boulevard, cross street access should be examined with the intention of providing adequate access in an organized pattern. Possible action in this regard would include: - Providing access from the west side of Brooklyn Boulevard oppo- site 59th Avenue - Realigning 60th Avenue and Admiral Lane to allow a single, four - legged intersection - Providing access to the retail area east of Brooklyn Boulevard opposite 61st Avenue. • The potential office development at the intersection of Brooklyn Boulevard and 58th Avenue will generate a large volume of traffic, particularly during the peak hours. Planning for that development should include consideration of adjacent developments, location of access points to Brooklyn Boulevard and 58th Avenue, and the coor- dination of traffic movement in the area. i PUBLIC CONTROLS In order to implement the he objectives of the Recommended Conceptual Alternative, 'certain amendments and additions to existing public land use and signage controls are necessary. The City of Brooklyn Center Zoning Ordinance should be amended as follows: • Property within the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor which is presently zoned R -5 (allowing multiple family dwellings of two and one half or three stories in height) should be rezoned to the R -3 Zoning Classification to accommodate townhouses and garden apartments (defined in Section 35 -900 of the City of Brooklyn Center Zoning Ordinance) as permitted uses. Such medium density residential land uses will allow the eventual conversion to a more intense, more eco- nomic function of the land presently utilized by single - family homes without resorting to a commercial land use or a high density resi- dential use. The latter two land uses are not generally favored by community residents. • In Section 35 -400, the Table of Minimum District Requirements, should be amended to require a minimum lot width in the C -1 Service /Office Zoning Classification of 150 feet and a minimum lot size of 1 acre. • In Section 35 -412, the Special Requirements in the C -2 Zoning Classification, should be amended to include a provision that access from a retail land use onto a local street intended primarily to serve residential development may only be allowed upon a finding by ( L7 -- 180 the City Council that such access will not negatively affect the residential environment of the nearby neighborhood. • In Section 35 -900, add the following definition: "Convenience -Food Restaurant ": An establishment whose principal business is the sale of foods, frozen deserts, or beverages to the customer in a "ready -to -eat" state for consumption either within the building or for carry -out with consumption either on or off the pre- mises, and whose design or principal method of operation includes both of the following characteristics: 1) Foods, frozen desserts, or beverages are usually served in edible containers or in paper, plastic, or other disposable containers 2) The customer is not served food at his /her table by an employee but receives it at a counter, window, or similar facility for carrying to another location on or off the pre- mises for consumption. • Any references to "drive -in eating establishments" should be revised to "convenience -food restaurant" so as to be consistent with and covered by the above definition. • Section 35- 320 -1 -S should be deleted and a new subsection added to read as - follows: 2. Accessory Uses Within office buildings having either a gross floor area of 40,000 or more square feet or at least 200 f u l l - t i m e office employees,a limited amount of ground floor areas may be used for facilities providing convenience goods and /or services for the office area occupants and their visitors. These uses shall be termed "Accessory" and shall include those listed below and any other uses whose primary function shall be to supply needed convenience goods and /or services for the office building occupants. The total net floor area devoted to these convenience goods or services shall not exceed 70p of the gross floor area of the building. (1) Barber shops (2) Book and stationary shops (3) Candy stores (4) Dry cleaning and laundry receiving and pick -up stations (with processing to be done elsewhere) (5) Gift shops (6) Office supply equipment, sales, and service (7) Telegraph or postal substations (8) Drug stores ( (9) Restaurants, cafes, or coffee shops (10) Newstands (11) Pipe and tobacco stands 181 The City of Brooklyn Center Sign Ordinance should be amended as follows: r� ' • Table 34A, "Table of Permitted Freestanding Sign Areas and Heights ", should require its allowable maximum signs areas be reduced by 20p. The maximum allowable sign height should be restricted to 24 feet. • The list of prohibited sign types should be expanded to include sign incorporating any "chasing action" (used to create the appearance of motion) or "scintillating action" (used to give - the effect of twinkling lights. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS Improvements in street lighting facilities are recommended for the entire length of Brooklyn Boulevard and in the City of Brooklyn Center. To improve the image and appearance of Brooklyn Boulevard, to lend additional definition to the corridor's commercial areas, and to increase traffic safety. Using a carefully selected and aesthetically pleasing lamp stan- dard, arm, and globe, the entire length of the Brooklyn Boulevard should be relighted. In residential areas this lighting should be designed to pro- duce a somewhat lesser degree of illumination than that provided for commercial sectors of the boulevard. It is further recommended that lighting fixtures should be selected for their low maintenance requirements and efficient energy use (i.e. high pressure sodium, metal halide, or mer- cury vapor lights). LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS Other public improvements which may upgrade the image and appearance of Brooklyn Boulevard include landscaping of the existing and proposed medians and publicly -owned land in the roadway's right -of -way. The wide medians in the vicinity of Brookdale Shopping Center provide exemplary opportunities of the creative use of landscaping. Coniferous plant materials should be given priority for usage to maintain a "green" image year around. Since public land areas constitute but a limited proportion of the land which may be landscaped along Brooklyn Boulevard, it is important to encourage the additional landscaping of privately -owned land as well. The City should make available a program of low interest loans to private land- owners along Brooklyn Boulevard to assist and encourage the construction of earthen berms and the planting of trees, shrubs, and flowers within the "setback" areas. 182 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER C_- a,,,a„ng ►1ft a 'A `19oZ An-6 Ilan N—h- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION REQUESTING HENNEPIN COUNTY PLACE A SIXTY DAY HOLD ON THE AUCTION OF A TAX FORFEITED PARCEL DEPT. APPROVAL: Mark P. Parish, City Assessor MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached i SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) *without a resolution from the City Council, Hennepin County will proceed with the auction sale of this parcel. The amount of delinquency is approximately $200. Staff is concerned that the purchase of this parcel, which is common area land, by a third party, would have a negative impact on all members of this association. A letter has been prepared for mailing to all owners (copy attached). It is hoped that the owners will take action to cure the default during this sixty day period to avoid further problems. RECOMNIENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION• Request favorable consideration of the attached resolution. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REQUESTING HENNEPIN COUNTY PLACE A SIXTY DAY HOLD ON THE AUCTION OF A TAX FORFEITED LAND PARCEL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center has received from the County of Hennepin, a list of land in Brooklyn Center which became the property of the State of Minnesota, for nonpayment of real estate taxes; and WHEREAS, each parcel of land described in said list has heretofore been classified by the Board of Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota, as nonconservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore been authorized by said Board of Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the specific parcel is common area land for the Ponds Townhouse Association and the sale of this parcel would be detrimental to the members of the association; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center believes the forfeiture will be cured by the Ponds Townhouse Association once the effects of third party ownership of this common area parcel is realized. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that said parcel, PID #28- 119 -21 -43 -0151, described as Lot 3, Block 1 of The Ponds Plat Four, being found on List 773 -NC of Tax Forfeited Lands, be held from auction for a period of sixty days to enable the former owners to cure the default. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. February 25, 1992 Dear Ponds Townhouse Owner: It has come to the attention of the City of Brooklyn Center that a portion of the common area land in your development is tax delinquent and may soon be sold at auction. We believe this would do serious harm to your ownership interests and we hope the sale can be avoided. Last night, the City Council passed a resolution asking Hennepin County to hold the parcel in question from auction for sixty days. Your townhouse association should contact the Tax Forfeited Land department at 348 -3734 to discuss payment. We understand the amount is approximately $200. The City believes payment should be made now to protect your interests. If the delinquent amount is not paid, the parcel will be sold at auction. If this parcel is purchased by a third party: • the marketability of your home may be reduced • the value of your home may be reduced • you may have title problems which would increase the selling costs and complicate any sale • the loss of this common area may push the development beyond the density requirements of City ordinances. In this case, your property would be a non - conforming use which would prevent issuance of future building permits, and limit your rights. As you can see, there are legal and financial implications in addition to the practical problems of having a third party own your common area. What should you do? We recommend you contact your owners association and direct them to resolve this issue with Hennepin County. Also, have them confirm the current mailing address with the City and County to assure that official notices are being received. Finally, if you have questions on how the sale of the common area would affect your interests, please discuss this letter with your attorney. A copy of an area map is enclosed with this letter. The Council's resolution should delay the sale until the end of April. We hope this matter is successfully resolved before then. Sincerel Gerald G poer City Man Enclosure / 7/33 5� i 711 h ♦ 5308 7109 7105 7101 7 clef T08/ � �Obb Q TOTT � T076 TOTS � � 7072 71169 Z 7068 7065 =D 706! �rn o h� 12 5'r 7061 5306 7057 5300 S CA L E i a i 0 i 0 N 1" = 150' 7� � 00 S� 7049 7p45 SHADED AREA 7041 w INDICATES �I 543 TAX FORFEITURE 7037 `" PROPERTY 703 i 7020 7021 701 7016 5229 7013 7 °12 5218 S21S 5206 5200 5118 S 112 5937 7009 7008 700 7004 70TH AVE N 7000 5513/ � 700 t- W 6933 6932 692! 6925 U 69�j 6y28 592S J 69 29 6y1, f- 6918 6919 n 6y O � 2 X 531- rn O O p Of O Cc cf 69 /s CD ca 6,917 6912 5413 D O WO 69/3 6912 6913 rn m 54°4 6908 z z &W7 &900 65Y16 5907 U H 6905 5874 U . 690/ 6900 5901 6900 5401 I 69TH AVE NO CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date February 24. 1992 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) STREET SWEEPER DEPT. APPROVAL: PAM_., Patricia A. Plie, Deputy City Clerk MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOnIMENDATION. No comments to supplement this report Comments below PP attached P below/ attached EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) • This sweeper was included in the storm drainage utility budget. This proposed piece of equipment P g Ty g P P P would replace an existing 1980 mechanical sweeper. The existing sweeper is getting costlier to maintain and it is at a oint where i would require major o tl overhaul which wouldn't extend e e t oud e ea costly P q Y its life much. Newer models of sweepers require less maintenance, and are less costly to run overall. The State of Minnesota awarded a contract to MacQueen Equipment Inc. for street sweepers. I have received confirmation from MacQueen Equipment that they can and will extend this contract price to the City of Brooklyn Center. The cost of the street sweeper, after trade -in of the existing 1980 Elgin Pelican street sweeper, is P g g P $62,755. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION I recommend approval of the attached resolution. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) STREET SWEEPER WHEREAS, it has been deemed necessary to purchase one (1) street sweeper usin g g Y e Storm Drainage Utility funds; and WHEREAS, it is possible for the City of Brooklyn Center to participate in a State of Minnesota contract to purchase the street sweeper; and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota contract was awarded to MacQueen Equipment Inc.; and WHEREAS, the cost of this equipment, after trade -in of the existing 1980 Elgin Pelican street sweeper, is $62,755. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center that the purchase of one (1) Hydro Dual Sweeper from MacQueen Equipment Inc. under State of Minnesota contract #C79382- 02258 -01 in the amount of $62,755 is hereby approved. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Xleeting Date r chruary zl. 1992 0 Agenda Item Number 1 3 -- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Kkk M* kk�kk yc�c k �c�cKkkKrc�cjc kkK K} crc�cic�c * *icy *� ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1991 AND 1992 GENERAL FUND BUDGETS TO CARRY FORWARD CERTAIN POLICE DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATIONS DEPT. APPROVAL: Ja'nfes Lindsay, Chief of Police MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached yes ) At the February 11, 1991 meeting, the City Council adopted a policy for offering Hepatitis B vaccinations to certain employees classified as "at risk" under Minnesota OSHA standards. At the June 10, 1991 meeting, the Council authorized the transfer of funds from contingency to pay the cost of this vaccination program. The vaccination program consists of a series of three vaccinations for each employee. The time frame of the doses are: one initial dose, a second dose 1 month after the first, and a third dose six months after the second. I It was determined that the city had one hundred and one (101) of these "at- risk" employees who expressed an interest in getting the vaccinations. We had obtained a bid from Dr. Orn to give the vaccinations at a total cost of $150 per employee ($50 per vaccination). The first doses were given to employees in mid - September and the second dose in mid- October. The third dose will need to be given in mid -April of this year. As the total funds were transferred into the 1991, we are requesting to bring forward the monies for the third vaccine that were left at the end of the year. This would be $50 each for the 101 employees for a total of $5,050. These monies should be transferred to the police department's medical expenses account #4314. Also, the police department received a grant during 1991 to fund the Outreach Worker program for a period of twelve months. As this twelve month period did not run the calendar year, but started on March 1, funds were also remaining at the end of the year which need to be brought forward to fund the remaining portion of the grant. A total of $7,750 needs to be brought forward into the police department's other contractual account #4420. • RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION I The City ouncil adopt the resolution authorizing the transfer of fun Y p b i ds. (RESPOLIC) Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1991 AND 1992 GENERAL FUND BUDGETS TO CARRY FORWARD CERTAIN POLICE DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATIONS ------------------------------------------------------------- WHEREAS, Section 7.08 of the City Charter does provide the City Council with the authority to appropriate funds from accumulated surplus in an amount equal to a previous appropriation in the General Fund Budget, if not in fact expended or encumbered for that purpose in the previous fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution 91 -147 approving a Hepatitis B vaccination program for certain employees which began in 1991 but which couldn't be completed until 1992; and WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution 91 -51 approving an "At Risk Youth Outreach Worker" program funded by a State Grant and running from March 1, 1991 through February 29, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center as follows: 1. To amend the 1991 General Fund Budget for amounts to be carried forward to 1992 as follows: Reduce the estimated revenues as follows: Transfers from Fund Balance Account $5,050 State Grants Drug Policy 7,750 $12,800 Reduce the appropriation of the Police Department as follows: Medical expenses (4314) $5,050 Contractual services (4400) 7,750 $12,800 2. To amend the 1992 General Fund Budget for amounts to be carried forward from 1991 as follows: Increase the estimated revenues as follows: Transfers from Fund Balance Account $5,050 State Grants Drug Policy 7,750 $12,800 Increase the appropriation of the Police Department as follows: Medical expenses (4314) $5,050 Contractual services (4400) 7,750 $12,800 Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date �'I'q/n y, Agenda Item Number 3 d REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1992 -02, LOCAL AREA NETWORK SYSTEM FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FACILITIES, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS, AND ACCEPTING PROPOSALS DEPT. APPROVAL: BARBARA A. GALLO, MIS COORDINATOR /PAUL HOL UND NANCE DIRECTOR MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Y Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) The Data Processing Advisory Committee developed a Management Information Systems (MIS) five - year strategic plan and approved it in October 1991. A central part of the plan was installing a local • area network in City Hall with the Garage, H Barn and the Earle Brown Heritage Center having access to it. The funding for the local area network was part of the 1992 capital outlay budget for Division 20, Data Processing. The local area network was approved and is part of the adopted 1992 annual budget. The local area network is also part of the Capital Improvements Program which was approved June 24, 1991 with resolution 91 -163. The MIS coordinator has been working with LOGIS staff on the specifications and acquiring proposals for the local area network. Again this year, LOGIS let formal bids and awarded contracts for IBM compatible PCs, peripherals, supplies, software and other PC related components according to Hennepin County guidelines. The LOGIS contracts include all components needed to establish a local area network (LAN). Because all LAN components are included in LOGIS' vendors catalogs and with the State of Minnesota's vendor catalog (Ameridata), it was not necessary to re -bid LAN components as long as the City orders through the LOGIS PC and Peripherals contracts or the State of Minnesota's PC and Peripherals contract. With LOGIS' encouragement and assistance Brooklyn Center along with Maple Grove, Minnetonka, Coon Rapids, and LOGIS requested a combined quote from the bid award vendors and we were able to get volume discounts on most components. The total cost of the project will be $75,765. $71,783 of that amount is the cost applicable to Division 20, Data Processing. The remainder $3,982 will be charged to the Earle Brown Tax Increment District. See attached memorandum to Gerald Splinter and Paul Holmlund for additional information. Staff is also available for more information. Action Required A resolution is provided for Council consideration. fad Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1992 -02, LOCAL AREA NETWORK SYSTEM FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FA C ILI TIES, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS, AND ACCEPTING PROPOSALS WHEREAS, installation of a Local Area Network is included in the Capital Improvements Program approved by Resolution 91 -163 on June 24, 1991, and the adopted 1992 annual budget includes $78,997 for the purchase and implementation of a local area network (LAN) for the City of Brooklyn Center facilities; and WHEREAS, the 1992 Earle Brown Tax Increment District annual budget includes, $4,395 for the conversion of the Earle Brown Heritage Center Local Area Network from ArcNet to Ethernet; and WHEREAS, the MIS coordinator and the Local Government Information System Association ( LOGIS) have jointly prepared specifications; and WHEREAS, LOGIS and the MIS coordinator have obtained quotes from contract vendors for the LAN components purchase and installation and propose that the components be purchased from the contract vendors listed below for the prices listed as follows: PC Express /PC Tronics Inc. $25,800 Entre Computer Center $13,800 Ameridata $6,800 Prairie & Associates $2,100 Productive Software Systems, Inc. $8,000 Egghead Discount Software $11,356 WHEREAS, LOGIS will provide training for the MIS Coordinator and consulting services as needed as part of their billable services in the amount of $2,200; WHEREAS, the MIS Coordinator has received one written quote of $1,113 from Office Products of Minnesota for a power conditioner and uniterruptible power supply unit to prevent file server hardware failure or loss of data due to interruptions in power; WHEREAS, the MIS Coordinator has recieved a written quote of $150 for an additional duplex receptacle; WHEREAS, the MIS Coordinator has received two written quotes for needed additional cabling for City facilities, including the Earle Brown Heritage Center and Inn as follows: Global Communications $4,829 P &T Communications $3,210 and the MIS coordinator recommends that the quote from P &T Communications be accepted since it is the lower quote; WHEREAS, the MIS Coordinator and LOGIS have recieved a quote of $436 from U.S. West to install the telephone circuits to allow access to the LAN and LOGIS by the Garage, H Barn and Earle Brown Heritage Center; and WHEREAS, the sum of the project quotes is $71,783 for Division 20, Data Processing and $3,982 for the Earle Brown Heritage Center and this sum is less than the amount budgeted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The following project is hereby established: LOCAL AREA NETWORK SYSTEM PROJECT NO. 1992 -02 2. The specifications for Local Area Network for said improvement project prepared by the MIS coordinator and LOGIS are hereby approved and ordered filed with the City Clerk. 3. The proposals of PC Express /PC Tronics, Entre Computer Center, Ameridata, Prairie & Associates, Productive Software Systems, Egghead Discount Software, Office Products of Minnesota, U.S. West, P &T Communications, Collins Electrical Systems, Inc., and LOGIS are hereby accepted. 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to enter into contracts with the above listed vendors on the basis of the quotes. 4. The portion of the costs for this improvement for City Hall, Garage and H Barn shall be charged to Data Processing Division 20 of the General Fund, Object No. 4551. 5. The portion of the costs for this improvement for the Earle Brown Heritage Center and Inn shall be charged to the Earle Brown Tax Increment District. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY :713 1ROOKLYN of BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE: 569 -3300 C ENTER, FAX: 569 -3494 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE MEMORANDUM 911 TO: Gerald Splinter and Paul Holmlund FROM: Barbara A. Gallo, MIS Coordinator DATE: February 21, 1992 SUBJECT: Proposed Improvement Project 1992 -02, Local Area Network System for the City, the Specifications and Proposals As you are aware the Data Processing Advisory Committee and its Development Subcommittee developed a Management Information Systems (MIS) five -year strategic plan. This plan was approved by the Data Processing Committee in October 1991. A central part of the plan was installing a local area network in City Hall with the Garage, H Barn and the Earle Brown Heritage Center having access to it. The funding for the local area network was part of the 1992 capital outlay budget for Division 20, Data Processing. The local area network was approved and is part of the adopted 1992 annual budget. The local area network is also part of the Capital Improvements Program which was approved June 24, 1991 with resolution 91 -163. Over the last five months I have been working with LOGIS staff Kevin Pikkaraine and Dave Babcock on the specifications and acquiring proposals for the local area network. This work is now completed and the project is ready to be sent to the City Council for approval. The total cost of the project will be $75,765. $71,783 of that amount is the cost applicable to Division 20, Data Processing. The remainder $3,982 will be charged to the Earle Brown Tax Increment District. This document will summarize the process LOGIS and I went through to create the design, specifications and to get the proposals. In addition I will review, for your information, what is a local area network and what its benefits are. !vesnu�.w�acacm What is a Local Area Network? fe A local area network (LAN) is a high - speed communications link for data processing equipment in a limited geographic area such as a building or department. LANs can connect personal computers (PCs), printers, mini computers and other devices together. Networked PCs can share data and resources such as file storage space, software and printers. Benefits of a Local Area Network for Brooklyn Center Installing a LAN in City Hall is necessary for staff to share PC based data electronically. A LAN will provide the following benefits: 1. Easy access to common files (spreadsheets, word processing files). 2. Multi -user access to databases. Microcomputer based databases such as the Business License database will be available to those who need access regardless of their location within City facilities. More than one user will be able to access the same database at the same time. 3. Electronic mail for network users. This will help improve interdepartmental communication because information about computer -based data can be given on a timely basis. An electronic data record is created of the information that can be stored or printed. 4. Multi -level security for file access. Access can be restricted to an application, a subdirectory and a file within a subdirectory. Rights to files and subdirectories can be assigned by group or individual. Currently anyone can access information contained on a PC if they can use the PC. 5. Sharing of printers among all PCs. The number of printers needed by staff will be decreased because printers will be available to more than one person from their workstation. 7. Print job spooling. This allows users to continue working while large documents, spreadsheets, or reports are printing. S. Easier upgrading software. Instead of having to install upgrades at each workstation, the MIS coordinator would just upgrade the software on the file server. 9. Disaster recovery. Regular backup of data files is accomplished by daily backup of the file server. This eliminates the need for individual users to back up their individual systems because important and /or strategic files and historical files should be stored on the file server and not on floppy disks or individual hard drives. 10. Use of file servers disk space. Individual workstations would not have to be purchased with large hard drives and multiple floppy drives. 11. Connection of network to LOGIS' network and Cities. 12. Improve the MIS coordinator's ability to provide support services. With just the purchase of inexpensive software, the coordinator will be able to see a users screen and fix problems from her workstation. Desijzn Specifications for Local Area Network After discussion with the development subcommittee to develop a list of what capabilities we were looking for in our local area network, I met with Kevin Pikkaraine and Dave Babcock to come up with the LAN design specifications. The requirements for our LAN included the ability for the computers at the Garage and at the H Barn to be able to access the file server. Access to the Earle Brown Heritage Center's LAN was also a must. The other requirements include file sharing, printer sharing, providing centralized backup of data and security of data. See Exhibit 1 for a graphical picture of the proposed LAN. Based on this information the following specifications were named: File Server — 486, 33 MHz ISA Computer with 12 MB RAM with two 1.2 GB SCSI Drives with hard drive controller for disk mirroring Print Server — 386, 33 MHz Computer with 4 MB RAM with a 80 MB hard drive Network Cards — 63, SMC 16 Bit Combo Ethernet Cards and two Microchannel SMC Ethernet Cards Network Operating System — Novell Netware 386 100 User Version Network Bridges & Hubs — four Codex DSU /CSUs, four Hewlett Packard Bridges, one Hewlett Packard Ether Twist Hub /48, one Hewlett Packard Ether Twist Hub /12 Uninterrupted Power Supply — ONEAC Uninterruptible Power Supply and Power Conditioner (600VA) notifies the file server of a power failure so the server can initiate automatic shutdown Network Back Up — Mountain 1.3 GB 4 MM Data Tape with Palindrome Network Archivist 2.0 software with SCSI adapter and 24, 4 MM data tape cartridges Software — 41 copies of 3000 Connection (allows access to LOGIS through the LAN) 20 User License for WordPerfect 20 User License for Spreadsheet Software 1 copy of LAN Assist, Printer Assist, Map Assist, and Modem Assist 10 copies of Central Point Anti -Virus software Telephone Circuits — Two 56 Kilobyte circuits are needed to allow communication between the Garage and the Earle Brown Heritage Center. Additional Cabling — 10 Twisted pair drops in City Hall, two in H Barn and four coaxial drops (1 in City Hall & 3 at Garage). One coaxial location and one twisted pair location at the Earle Brown Heritage Center and three twisted pair locations at the Inn. Additional Electrical — Installation of duplex receptacle Training and Consulting — Certified Novell Engineer Training and license for MIS coordinator and consulting as needed Process to be Used to Purchase Local Area Network Components Again this year (contract year 1991/92) LOGIS let formal bids and awarded contracts for IBM compatible PCs, peripherals, supplies software and other PC related components as stated in their bid documents. LOGIS followed the formal bid process by publishing bid announcements, sending bid proposals to numerous PC dealers and vendors, and requiring a signed sealed bid to be returned to LOGIS by August 16, 1992, 10:a.m. At that time a public bid opening was held at the LOGIS offices. Upon analyses of all bids, PC Express was awarded one contract for IBM PC compatible systems, peripherals, supplies, and other catalog items and Entre Computer Center was awarded contract #9202 for Hewlett Packard specific PCs, printers, supplies, peripherals and all other product items in the submitted catalog. (Refer to attached memo from Mike Garris to Gerald Splinter dated February 19, 1992.) The LOGIS contracts include all components needed to establish a local area network (LAN). Because all LAN components are included in LOGIS' vendors catalogs and with the State of Minnesota's vendor catalog (Ameridata), it was not necessary to re -bid LAN components as long as the City orders through the LOGIS PC and Peripherals contracts or the State of Minnesota's PC and Peripherals contract. With LOGIS' encouragement and assistance Brooklyn Center along with Maple Grove, Minnetonka, Coon Rapids, and LOGIS requested a combined quote from the bid award vendors and we were able to get volume discounts on most components. Since cabling is not part of the LOGIS or State contracts, I received to written proposals that include quoted prices for installing the additional cable locations. Proposals have been received from P &T Communications and Global Communications Services. P &T Communications has been selected because their proposal is lowest. A quote from Collins Electric for the needed additional electrical receptacle was also received. A quote was received from Office Products of Minnesota for a unitteruptible power supply and power conditioner for the file server. This unit will help prevent file server hardware failure and loss of data to do power spikes and power failures. Two 56 Kilobyte circuits are needed to allow communication between the Garage and the Earle Brown Heritage Center. A kilobyte is 1,024 bytes. A byte is a eight -bit group of data. U.S. West will install the circuits at a cost of $436. The monthly charge for each circuit will be $28. All the software needed in addition to the network operating system will be purchased using LOGIS or Hennepin County contract vendors. Written quotes for the software listed above have been received from these vendors. The 3000 Connection software will be purchased from Productive Software Systems, Inc. and all other software will be purchased from Egghead Discount Software. The file and print servers, network cards, and Novell Netware 386 will be purchased from PC Express Inc. Entre Computer Center will provide the network bridges and hubs. Prairie & Associates will provide the Codex DSU /CSUs and Ameridata will provide the uninterrupted power supply, the Mountain tape back up drive and Palindrome software. Attached are the components listed by vendor. This listing includes the prices for each component along with the total cost of the project and the amount to be paid by Division 20 and the Earle Brown Tax Increment District. Components for Local Area Network and Quoted Prices for Components PC Express Inc. File Server 1, 486 33 MHz ISA Computer with 12 MB RAM and 2, 1.2 GB SCSI Drives with hard drive controller for disk mirroring $ 6,200 Print Server 1, 386 33 MHz Computer with 4 MB RAM and 80 MB hard drive $ 1,300 Network Cards 63,SMC 16 Bit Combo Ethernet Cards $13,800 2,Microchannel SMC Ethernet Cards 500 Network Operating System Novell Netware 386 100 User Version $4,000 Total PC Express $25,800 Entre Computer Center Network Bridges & Hubs 4, Hewlett Packard Bridges $ 9,600 1, Hewlett Packard Ether Twist Hub /48 $ 3,000 1, Hewlett Packard Ether Twist Hub /12 1 Total Entre Computer $13,800 Ameridata Network Back Up Mountain 1.3 GB 4 MM Data Tape with Palindrome Network Archivist 2.0 software with SCSI adapter and 24 4 MM data tape cartridges 6,80 Total Ameridata $7,600 Prairie & Associates 4,Codex DSU /CSUs $ 2,100 Productive Software Systems, Inc 41, 3000 Connection $8,000 Egg head Discount Software 1 copy of Lan Assist Plus $169 1 copy of Map Assist $289 1 copy of Modem Assist Plus $299 1 copy of Printer Assist /Que Assist bundled $399 10 user subscription of Central Point Anti -Virus $800 20 User License for WordPerfect $3,200 20 User License for r se a Spreadsheet Software P $6,200 Total Egghead Discount Software $11,356 Office Products of Minnesota Uninterrupted Power Supply 1, ONEAC Uninterruptible Power Supply and power conditioner with software that notifies file server of power failure to initiate automatic shutdown $l,ll3 U.S. West Communications Installation of two 56 KB circuits $436 P &T Communications 10 Twisted pair drops in City Hall, 2 in H Barn and 4 coax drops (1 in City Hall & 3 at Garage) $2,260 1 coax location at the Earle Brown Heritage Center and 3 twisted pair locations at the Inn. 950 Total P &T Communications $3,210 Collins Electrical Systems Inc. Installation of duplex receptacle $150 LOGIS Certified Novell Engineer Training and license for MIS coordinator $1,200 Consulting fees $1,00 0 Total LOGIS $2,200 Total Division 20, Data Processing $71,783 Total Earle Brown Tax Increment District $3,982 Total Local Area Network Costs 1 75,765 Garage Print Server Uk 4 F" File Server m r Proposed a Brooklyn Center .- LAN "'"J EBHC m x - H Barn MEMORANDUM Date: February 19, 1992 To: Gerald Splinter A-4- From: Nlike Garris Subject: Purchase of Local Area Network Components Through LOGES PC Bid Contracts Introduction The purpose of Lhis memorandum is to describe the process when using LOGIS PC and Peripheral Bid Contracts to order PC's and other Local Area Network (LAN) components , Backg oc and Again this year (contract year 1991/92) LOGIS has let formal bids and awarded contracts for IBM compatible PC's, peripherals, supplies, software and other PC related components as stated in the bid documents. Vendors included their product catalogs and these were made a part of the bid response and subsequent contract awards. LOGIS followed the formal bid process by publishing bid announcements, sending bid proposals to numerous PC dealers and vendors, and requiring a signed sealed bid to be returned to LOGIS by August 16, 1992, 10:00 a.m. At that time a public bid opening was held at the LOGIS offices. Upon analyses of all bids, PC Express was awarded one contract (#9203) for IBM PC compatible systems, peripherals, supplies, other catalog items and Entre Computer Center was awarded contract #9202 for Hewlett Packard specific PCs, printers, supplies, peripherals and all other product items in the submitted catalog. As a side note, the LOGIS PC bid contract pricing fell significantly below the State's Ameridata PC vendor contracts. Included in the LOGIS contracts are many different components which can be purchased along with the PC systems ordered. Printers, monitors, additional disk drives, memory chips, cabling, etc., are just a few examples of these different components necessary for various office PC systems. Included in these contracts are also all components needed to establish hardware and software connections to the various PC's so they can. communicate and share software and data with one another, This arrangement is typically described as a Local Area Network or LAN. Discussion Because all LAN components were included in our vendors catalog or products bid, it is not necessary for a city to re -bid LAN components as Iong as the city orders through the LOGIS PC and Peripheral Contracts. The LAN is merely those PC's, cabling, software, hardware, LAN cards and other optional equipment needed to establish the LAN. LOGIS also recommended that cities currently interested in acquiring LAN components request a combined quote from the bid award vendors through the PC contracts so that volume discounts, if any, could be passed along to those cities. MG:pg (REQPLAY) CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Counci t Meeting Date oZ o� g Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN APPROPRIATION FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND FOR THE CITY'S SHARE OF THE COST OF THE EVERGREEN PARK SCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROJECT DEPT. APPROVAL: CAA/L& }J Charles Hansen, Assistant Finance Director MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION::,, t o� No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY E %PLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) The Park and Recreation Commission brought a proposal to the City Council at its December 3, 1990 meeting for the City to commit $15,000 to a project to construct a new playground at Evergreen Park School. • The matter was referred to the City Manager for review to determine the playground needs in the Evergreen Park area. A review was completed in cooperation with Anoka Hennepin School District officials and the Evergreen Park Elementary School PTO. This was returned to the City Council for consideration at its May 13, 1991 meeting. The City Council approved the project by motion and committed $15,000 to it from the Capital Improvements Fund. This type of project technically must be approved by resolution. So it is coming to you again for passage of the attached resolution to confirm your earlier approval and to authorize final payment. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION Passage of the attached resolution. (RESPLAY) Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN APPROPRIATION FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND FOR THE CITY'S SHARE OF THE COST OF THE EVERGREEN PARK SCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROJECT ---------------------------------------------------------- WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center passed Resolution 68 -246 which established a Capital Improvements Fund in order to provide for certain major, permanent facilities needed by the city; and WHEREAS, the Park and Recreation Commission recommended to the City Council at its December 3, 1990 meeting that the City should commit $15,000 to participate with the Anoka Hennepin School District in the construction of a playground project at Evergreen Park School; and WHEREAS, the City Council discussed the matter again at its May 3, 1991 meeting and approved by motion that $15,000 from the Capital Improvements Fund be committed to the project; and WHEREAS, construction has now been completed and the school has invoiced the City for its promised $15,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The amount of $15,000 is appropriated from the Capital Improvements Fund for the Evergreen Park School Playground. 2. Payment of $15,000 to Evergreen Park School is approved. 3. The project is declared to be final and closed. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. EVERGREEN PARK SCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROJECT The City Manager reviewed this item for the Council, noting that the City was requested to provide $15,000 which would be spent for the Evergreen Park School Playground Project. School District 11 and the City would cooperate to provide the students of Evergreen Park School and the citizens of Brooklyn Center with a new playground. He recommended approval of the item and noted City equipment would be used to haul sand, and any stands removed would be reinstalled. In response to Councilmember Pedlar's question, the City Manager indicated the money would come from the capital improvements fund. There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to approve the project as presented by staff and to approve $15,000 funding from the Capital Improvement Fund. The motion passed unanimously. RECESS The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 8:20 p.m. and reconvened at 8:37 p.m. DISCUSSION ITEMS (CONTINUED CONTROLLING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS AND PAVING IN FRONT YARDS AND YARDS ABUTTING A PUBLIC STREET The City Manager presented to the Council a draft ordinance for discussion and pictorial evidence of existing situations that illustrated problems and potential consequences of an ordinance. The Director of Planning and Inspection indicated modifying the 50 % paving rule would be one issue the proposed ordinance would address. He indicated the main provisions of the ordinance would include: 1. All driveways for single- family and two - family residential dwellings to be hard surfaced such as concrete, asphalt, or a well compacted gravel. 2. Driveways leading to a garage would not be allowed to exceed the width of that garage. 3. Driveways not leading to a garage would be limited to 12' in width. 4. Paved or graveled extensions of authorized driveways would be limited to 12' for parking or turnaround areas. 5/13/91 There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Scott to rename the arboretum as the "Eugene H. Hagel Arboretum." The motion passed with Mayor Nyquist opposed. The City Manager stated the second recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission was for the City to commit $15,000 plus labor for enhancements to the Evergreen Park Elementary School playground. He stated he is recommending referral of the proposal to the City Manager for review and cooperative work with Anoka Hennepin School District officials and Evergreen Park Elementary School PTO to determine the playground needs in the Evergreen Park area. He stated he would come back with a more specific proposal from the school district. Councilmember Scott inquired where the money would be taken from to fund this project. The City Manager stated it would be taken from the capital improvements fund. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Cohen referring the Evergreen Park Elementary School playground additions proposal to the City Manager for review and cooperative work with Anoka Hennepin School District officials and Evergreen Park Elementary School PTO to determine the playground needs in the Evergreen Park area. The motion passed unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS The City Manager stated he would recommend the Council's support of James Krautkremer for a seat on the Metropolitan Council. Councilmember Paulson inquired what the City of Brooklyn Park is doing. Mayor Nyquist stated Brooklyn Center has never followed Brooklyn Parks' lead before, and he doesn't believe they should start doing so at this point. He added that Mr. Krautkremer is the only one interested at this point anyway. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Scott directing staff to prepare a letter for the Mayor's signature supporting James Krautkremer for a seat on the Metropolitan Council. The motion passed unanimously. The City Manager noted he included with the Council packet information regarding the process used in the past for appointment to a Council vacancy. He noted the City Council must make an appointment within 30 days of the vacancy or a special election would occur. He noted it was necessary to get this process started as soon as possible. He stated he would recommend taking applications through December 21 or 28 and making the appointment at the second meeting in January. Councilmember Paulson stated he felt setting a deadline of December 21 would not allow enough time. A discussion then ensued regarding the application due date. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Paulson authorizing acceptance of applications for the vacant Council seat until 4:30 p.m. on December 31, 1990. The motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Paulson to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 9:47 p.m. ' ,P Deputy City Clerk Mayor 12/3/90 -9- CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date February 24, L 1992 Agenda Item Number ✓ /� REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A CULTURAL DIVERSITY TRAINING PROGRAM DEPT. APPROVAL.,: Tom Bublitz, Assistant EDA Coordinator MANAGERS REVIEWRRECOMNIENDATION. No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached x SUNDIARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) • The attached material from the Government Training Service (GTS) provides an overview of the Cultural Diversity Project. The project has been proposed in four phases. Phase I includes initial project development, needs assessment, Focus Groups and surveys. Phase II is the policy makers retreat. Phase III is the management /supervisory staff training. Phase IV employee workshops. The Focus groups are currently being organized and will include the following groups: 1. Policy makers. 2. Management supervisory and other staff. 3. Youth. 4. Communities of color. 5. Community leaders. is 6. Police Departments. 7. Three randomly selected City employee groups. The intent of the Focus Groups is to help determine the relevant issues for the design of the initial policy makers retreat. The Focus Group experience will also serve as a foundation for development of a survey to be conducted with City staff. PROJECT FUNDING The City of Brooklyn Park, as initiator of the project, contributed $5,000 as "seed money" for the planning and development phase of the project. The total cost of the four phases of the project, for all five cities, is approximately $40,000. Grant proposals have been submitted by the Government Training Service and INTER -RACE, to several foundations to cover the remainder of the project costs. Cities will be asked to absorb some of the direct costs of the project, such as meals for policy makers and staff at the retreats and training sessions. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION Staff recommends approval of resolution supporting a Cultural Diversity Training Program. • 13F Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A CULTURAL DIVERSITY TRAINING PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center continues to experience change and diversity in its demographic composition; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has a commitment to excellence in service to its residents; and WHEREAS, understanding the needs of a diverse community is an important component to providing excellent public service, and; WHERAS, the Cultural Diversity Training Program proposed by the Government Training Service and INTER -RACE will provide necessary training for the employees of the City of Brooklyn Center. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center hereby endorses the concept of cultural diversity training as expressed in the Government Training Service /INTER -RACE proposals, subject to City Council approval of a financing plan. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. PROJECT AT A GLANCE "Diversity: Creating a Public Vision for the Northwest Suburbs" The Need and Onnortunity As Minnesota's workforce and communities become more culturally and economically diverse, new opportunities and problems have arisen as cities attempt to respond to the challenge. Changing values and attitudes of employees as they serve a changing client base is a major issue facing cities and school districts. This is especially true in the first -ring suburbs, which are now encountering the challenges long associated with the core cities: poverty, housing disintegration, growing diversity in the population. Among the key diversity issues that cities face are the following: • customer service problems - -a workforce that isn't diverse is dealing with customers who are, • employees unskilled in relating to each other in a diverse workplace, • of direction; being reactive rather than proactive. Consequently, it is clear that four groups are central to any change: policy - makers, managers, employees and citizens. Further, it is also necessary that specific change strategies for all groups must be employed so that the effect of the values, beliefs and behaviors of each group are understood in shaping public opinion about the issue. Policymakers can make rapid progress by developing the "big picture" through value statements for their organizations and support for policy development. Managers and employees then operationalize the "big picture" and make diversity real throughout the area if committed to change. Cities have been trying to address these issues in their own jurisdictions, but now need to work across geographic and agency boundaries. What the Protect Is A pro- active initiative designed to create a public vision about diversity in their communities. It is designed to be a comprehensive approach -- resulting (in the long -term) in the institutionalization of both the process and the support systems needed for positive attitudinal and behavioral change to happen. This joint effort is seen as the beginning of a long -term process. During the first year, a joint 5 -year action plan will be produced and several key implementation steps will be completed as delineated below. The collaborators recognize that major change takes time. The strength of this project is that g P 7 it institutes a process and systems which can and will effect that individual and organizational change. Who's Involved The Cities of: Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Crystal New Hope Robbinsdale The School Districts of: Brooklyn Center Osseo Robbinsdale Northwest Hannepin Human Services Council (NWHHSC) Government Training Service (GTS) INTER -RACE Hennepin County Prevention Center (HCPC) Project Advisory Committee (Representing the above and the community at large) The Steps The project includes a sequence of important steps: • Data would be collected about the communities- - through statistics /written materials and through input from citizens in focus groups. [IN • Polic ake ym rs and top administrators from each jurisdiction and school district would participate in a joint planning retreat to conceptualize the "big picture," plus develop overall value statements and action plans. [APRIL 10 -11, 1992] • After individualizing these to each municipality, educational workshops for managers and employees would be developed and conducted. • Finally, a joint session for policymakers would be held to assess progress and plan for the next year's efforts. The impact of the project on the northwest suburbs will be greatly increased by its combination of joint and targeted activities. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date 2/24/92 Agenda Item Numbe REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: LICENSES DEPT. APPROVAL: a Sharon Knutson, Deputy City Clerk MANAGERS REVIEW/RECONEVIENDATION: R V No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ******************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUNEVIARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) Attached is the list of licenses to be approved by the city council. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION Approve licenses. Licenses to be approved by the City Council on February 24, 1992: / AMUSEMENT DEVICE - OPERATOR / Kids "R" Us 5717 Xerxes Ave. N. ief of Police 4k CATERING FOOD VEHICLE o Bridgeman's 6201 Brooklyn Blvd. ! •a• Sanitarian FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Korean Presbyterian Church of MN 5840 Humboldt Ave. N.. r Sanitarian - GARBAGE AND REFUSE COLLECTION VEHICLE f� Block Sanitation 8924 Ashley Terrace 1 Q Sanitarian ABC MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Air Conditioning Associates, Inc. 689 Pierce Butler Rt. ry Snelling Mechanical, Inc. 1402 Concordia Ave. 0, Building Official p,k_ NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINES Apple Automatic Food Service 6313 Cambridge St. Royal Business Forms 6840 Shingle Ck Pkwy Maranatha Cons. Baptist Home 5401 - 69th Ave. N. Norcroftt, Inc. 8833 Jefferson Highway Brooklyn Center High School 6500 Humboldt Ave. N. Service America Corporation 7490 Central Ave. NE n /�, MTC 6845 Shingle Ck Pkwy �✓ �'L Sanitarian PERISHABLE VENDING MACHINES Apple Automatic Food Service 6313 Cambridge St. Royal Business Forms 6840 Shingle Ck Pkwy Maranatha Cons. Baptist Home 5401 - 69th Ave. N. Norcroftt, Inc. 8833 Jefferson Highway Brooklyn Center High School 6500 Humboldt Ave. N. Service America Corporation 7490 Central Ave. NE �• /1 MTC 6845 Shingle Ck Pkwy l •� Sanitarian Q,k READILY PERISHABLE FOOD VEHICLE Bridgeman's 6201 Brooklyn Blvd. Sanitarian SPECIAL FOOD HANDLING ESTABLISHMENT Kohl's Department Store 2501 Co. Rd. 10 Paper Warehouse 7634 Golden Triangle `, Sanitarian TAXICAB Town Taxi 2500 Washington Ave. N. #124 C of of Police GENERAL APPROVAL: patl `✓"' . P. Page, Deputy Clerk