Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985 05-20 CCM Regular Session MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION MAY 20, 1985 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor an Nyquist, Councilmembers Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Works Sy Knapp, Director of Planning & Inspection Ron Warren, Director of Finance Paul Holmlund, City Attorney Richard Schieffer, and Administrative Assistant Brad Hoffman. INVOCATION The invocation was offered by Councilmember Rich Theis. OPEN FORUM Mayor Nyquist noted the Council had not received any requests to use the Open Forum session this evening. He inquired if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to address the Council. There being none, he continued with the regular agenda items. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Nyquist inquired if any of the Councilmembers requested any items removed from the Consent Agenda. None of the Councilmembers requested any items removed from the Consent Agenda and the Mayor continued with the regular agenda items. Mayor Nyquist introduced the next agenda item recognizing Dr. Duane Orn for services on the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council Advisory Commission. Mayor Nyquist presented a plaque to Dr. Orn and expressed the City's gratitude for his service. Dr. Orn thanked the Council and indicated that while he was resigning from the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council, that he would still be active in other capacities serving the community. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 6, 1985 There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting of May 5, 1985 as submitted. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 85 -81 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION, RECEIVING ENGINEER'S REPORT, ESTABLISHING 65TH AVENUE NORTH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1985 -14, AND CALLING FOR A HEARING THEREON 5 -20 -85 -1- The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 85 -82 Member Till Hawes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION DECLARING JUNE 26 THROUGH 30 AS BROOKLYN CENTER EARLE BROWN DAYS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Rich Theis, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 85 -83 Member Rich Theis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DISPATCH AND USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BY CITY MANAGER IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS TThe City Manager introduced the next agenda item that being the Traffic Moratorium Study. He briefly reviewed the study and indicated that it was a staff recommendation that the moratorium not be extended. He also suggested that, in light of the findings of the study, the staff be directed to refrain from issuing special use permits in industrial and commercial zones without a traffic analysis of the proposed use and that the staff be directed to review the special use permit section of the zoning ordinance for possible modification. Following the City Manager's presentation, Councilmember Theis inquired if such traffic analysis would be done in- house. The City Manager provided that such analysis would not done in -house but rather be done by an outside consulting agency. He also indicated that those requesting special use permit would be required to pay for the traffic analysis. He estimated that such analysis would run between $500 and $1,000. A brief discussion then ensued relative to the study. Councilmember Lhotka made a motion and seconded by Councilmember Scott directing the staff to research possible modifications of the zoning ordinance relative to special use permits and that the Engineering Department pursue and study recommended traffic signalization within the traffic study area. Voting for the motion: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NOS. 85001 AND 85003 SUBMITTED BY RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR A SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR SHINGLE CREEK CENTER -" 5 -20 -85 -2- i The City Manager pointed out that both planning commission items were reviewed and approval was recommended by the Planning Commission at their February 14, 1985 meeting. He also indicated that Planning Commission No. 85002 submitted by Ryan Construction for an auto service center at the proposed Target Center had been withdrawn. The Director of Planning & Inspection presented and reviewed for Councilmembers pages one through five of the minutes of the February 14, 1985 Planning Commission meeting. He noted that Planning Commission Application No. 85001 was a request for site and building plan approval to construct a 105,000 sq. ft. Target Store and a 34,160 sq. ft. attached retail center on land east of Shingle Creek Parkway between John Martin Drive and Summit Drive. The Secretary then reviewed details of the site plan that had been negotiated with Target and Ryan Construction Company. He also reviewed Planning Commission Application No. 85003 submitted by Ryan Construction for preliminary plat approval to combine six lots and resubdivide into two of the land east of Shingle Creek Parkway between John Martin and Summit Drive. The Planning Director noted that Application No. 85001 had been recommended contingent upon 17 conditions as noted in the minutes and that Application No. 85003 had been recommended by the Planning Commission contingent on six conditions. The Director read those conditions from the minutes of the February 14th Planning Commission meeting. Following the Planning Director's presentation, Mayor Nyquist called a public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 85003 to order. There being no public comment, there was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to close the public hearing. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve the Application No. 85001 subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of building permits. 3• A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits to assure completion of approved site improvements. 4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 5. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 6. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 5 -20 -85 -3- 7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 8. B612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas, including parking lot islands. 9. The replat of the property shall receive final approval by the City Council and be filed at the County prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. Plan approval excludes the restaurant portion of the project which is subject to future review and approval. 11. An outside storage in the garden center area shall be effectively screened from view by an opaque masonry wall. Excepted from this condition are the tops of tree seedlings. However, no packaged merchandise shall be visible from outside the garden center. There shall be no outside storage of semitrailers on the site with the exception of trailers parked at the loading docks. 12. Plan approval acknowledges a proof -of- parking which meets the minimum requirement of the City Ordinances for 880 spaces. The applicant (Target and Ryan Construction) shall acknowledge in writing that, if the City deems it necessary, they shall install parking as required by City Ordinances (up to 880 spaces). 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to install all on- site traffic control signs as approved by the Director of Public Works. 14. The landscape plan shall be modified prior to the issuance of building permits, to include or acknowledge the following: a. The relocation of shrubs for the island areas to other appropriate locations on the site. b. Additional shade trees at the southeast portion of the site in the greenstrip between the LaBelle's property and the proposed shopping center. 15. That exterior modifications to the Target building, such as rounded corners, be included on the site plan prior to issuance of building permits. 16. The applicant is encouraged to continue negotiations with LaBelle's for the purpose of providing a common loading area. Voting for the motion: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against the same: none. The motion passed unanimously. There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve Planning Application No. 85003 subject to the following conditions: 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 5 -20 -85 -4- 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 3• The plat shall be modified to include sidewalk easements in I � accordance with the recommendations of the Director of Public Works. 4. The applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the City stipulating responsibility for and assessment of costs for certain improvements to public facilities within the public right -of -way, including, but not limited to: a. potential installation of traffic signals at John Martin Drive and Shingle Creek Parkway and at Summit Drive and Earle Brown Drive. b. installation of deceleration lanes serving accesses on Shingle Creek Parkway and on Summit Drive. c. relocation of public sidewalks as necessary. 5. The applicant shall execute cross easements for access and parking between Lots 1 and 2 prior to final approval by the City Council. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Scott to give final approval to Shingle Creek Center plat Planning Commission Application No. 85003• Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 85 -84 Member Rich Theis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR SHINGLE CREEK CENTER The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. The Director of Planning & Inspection introduced the next agenda item, Planning Commission Application No. 85010 submitted by Dawn Weum for special use permit approval to operate a nursery school in the basement of the Brooklyn United Methodist Church at 7200 Brooklyn Boulevard. He noted that the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Commission Application No. 85010 at its May 9, 1985 meeting. The Director of Planning then reviewed pages one and two of the May 9 Planning Commission meeting. He noted that the proposal was in actuality a continuation of an operation which has existed for the last ten years and 5 -20 -85 -5- represented a change in ownership. The Planning Commission recommended approval subject to six conditions. Mayor Nyquist then called a public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 85010. There being no public comment, a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to close the public hearing. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to approve Planning Commission Application No. 85010 subject to the following conditions: 1. The permit is issued to the applicant as operator of the facility and is nontransferable. 2. The permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations and any violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation. 3. The hours of operation shall be: 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday and 9:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., Friday. 4. The applicant shall submit a current copy of her state operator's license to be kept on file at the City offices prior to issuance of the special use permit. 5. Permit approval acknowledges 30 parking spaces to the rear of the church as adequate for handling traffic of parents dropping off and picking up children at the nursery school. 6. The permit is subject to compliance with orders of the Building Inspector and the Fire Marshal. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. The City Manager introduced Planning Commission Application No. 85011 and Planning Commission Application No. 85012 submitted by Uhde /Nelson, Inc. for site and building plan and special use permit approval and preliminary plat approval on the old City Hall property at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard respectively. The Planning Director then reviewed pages three through seven of the May 9, 1985 minutes. He noted the Planning Commission commented on the compatability of various proposed office developments with the comprehensive plan recommendations for that area of the boulevard. He also noted that the neighbors in the area commented when the old City Hall building burned down by stating their preference for an office development. He explained that the property was sold to Uhde /Nelson, Inc. on the basis of the concept for the office development. The Secretary then reviewed Planning Commission Application No. 85012, a request for a preliminary plat approval and to a single lot for the parcels of land that made up the old City Hall site at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard. He noted that a boundary discrepancy had been indicated, although, such discrepancies were not uncommon when platting property. He suggested that the proposed plat be reviewed by the County land surveyor and possibly commented on by the City Attorney. Following the Secretary's presentation, Mayor Nyquist called a public hearing on 5 -20 -85 -6- Planning Commission Application No. 85011. There being no public comment, there was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to close the public hearing. There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve Planning Commission Application No. 85011 subject to the following conditions: 1. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations and any violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation. 2. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 3. Grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of building permits. Specifically, the applicant should comply with the conditions of the City Engineer's memo of May 2, 1985 to the Director of Planning and Inspection and other conditions as imposed by the City Engineer. 4. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure completion of approved site improvements. m PP p 5. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 6. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 9. B612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 10. The plat for the property shall receive final approval and be filed at the County prior to issuance of building permits. 11. Plan approval acknowledges the existing cedar hedge along the north and east property lines as providing appropriate screening from neighboring residential uses as required by City ordinance. If this landscape screening fails, it shall be replaced by comparable landscaping or by a minimum 4' high opaque fence. The cedar hedge shall be extended westward to completely screen the residences to the north from all parking on the subject property. 5 -20 -85 -7- 12. Absent change in the utility plans acceptable to the City Engineer, the applicant shall provide the City with a copy of a utility easement over the neighboring Boulevard Plaza property prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. The applicant shall provide a $1,000 cash guarantee to insure proper and timely replacement of the sidewalk along Brooklyn Boulevard. 14. Utility "as- built" information shall be provided to the City prior to release of the performance guarantee cited in Condition No. 4. 15. The applicant shall enter into a standard utility maintenance agreement prior to the issuance of building permits. 16. The site and building plans shall be certified by a registered architect prior to the issuance of building permits. 17. Plan approval acknowledges phased development of the property. If construction does not begin within one year of initiation of the project, the second phase area shall be graded and seeded and permanent improvements shall be deferred for a period of up to three years. The bond for the project shall not be released until all permanent improvements have been installed. 18. Approval of the second building is subject to further review and approval of the building plans. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Nyquist then called a public hearing together on Planning Commission Application No. 85012. There being no public comment, there was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to close the public hearing on Planning Commission No. 85012. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion P assed unanimously. . There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to approve Planning Commission Application No. 85012 subject to the following conditions: 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 3. The preliminary plat shall be modified in accordance with the City Engineer's memo of May 2, 1985. 4. The plat shall be subject to approval by the Hennepin County land surveyor with respect to the proper location of property monuments. 5. The City Attorney shall submit an opinion as to the validity of the plat surveyor's practices in locating property corners prior to final lat approval. A AP 6. The final plat shall be approved by the City Council and filed with Hennepin County prior to the issuance of building permits for the building proposed under Planning Commission Application No. 85011. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. The City Manager then introduced Planning Commission Application No. 85013 submitted by Uhde /Nelson, Inc. for site and building plan approval to construct a two -story office building on the vacant parcel of land between the Girl Scout offices and the Brooklyn Law Center building in the 5600 block of Brooklyn Boulevard. He noted the Planning Commission recommended approval of the application at its May 9, 1985 meeting. The Planning Director then reviewed the minutes of the May 9 Planning Commission meeting, specifically pages one and two. He noted the proposed office building was a two -story 8,900 sq. ft. office building. He specifically noted that the access to the site would be from the Brooklyn Boulevard frontage road. He noted that because the site fronts on a service road, are the normal 35' and 15' respectively, rather than the greater requirements for developments adjacent to a major thoroughfare (50'setback and 35' setback). He then reviewed the ordinance ks change with the Council that made such setbacks g b c possible. A general discussion then ensued relative to the setbacks of the building relative to the adjacent buildings. The Planning Director reviewed the drawing illustrating the setback lines for the proposed building. Councilmember Lhotka requested opportunity to review the plans. There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve Planning Commission Application No. 85013 subject to the following conditions: 1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure completion of approved site improvements. 4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 5. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 5 -20 -85 -9- 6. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 8. B612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 9. The site and building plans shall be certified by a registered architect prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. Plan approval acknowledges proof -of- parking for one parallel stall west of the building. The applicant shall agree in writing to install this additional space upon a determination by the City that insufficient parking exists on the site. 11. The building will be situated on the site so as to minimize the setback difference with the adjacent buildings. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. RECESS The City Council recessed from 9:05 p.m. and reconvened at 9:21 p.m. DISCUSSION ITEMS EXIT RAMP BETWEEN I -694 TO T.H. 252 The City Manager introduced the first discussion item calling for a redesign of the exit ramp for westbound traffic on I -694 to T. H. 252. The City Engineer reviewed the proposed design noting that there is currently conflict with people exiting I- 694 to T. H. 252 and then taking a left turn onto 66th Avenue North. He noted that the distance is too short and that it was a hazardous move. He then displayed a redesign that appeared to solve the problem. He noted that it would require the acquisition of right -of -away involving several parcels east of T. H. 252 and south of 66th Avenue North. He noted that the highway department would be willing to include the change but would require the City to acquire the property in question and provide for part of the cost of the construction. Councilmember Lhotka indicated his displeasure with MN /DOT indicating that he felt that the City had given the highway department ample time and opportunity to design such an interchange. He indicated he felt that the City was again getting the short end of the stick from MN /DOT. The Director of Public Works concurred with Councilmember Lhotka, and noted that MN /DOT did not have the funds for the project and that the timing was too short to go through their process to acquire necessary funds. He also noted that MN /DOT had been informed of the problem over two years ago and was not just now responding to the problem. Following the general discussion of the concept, there was a consensus of the Council that staff be directed to pursue feasibility of the project and report back to the Council. 5 -20 -85 -10- RECOMMENDATION NOT TO PURCHASE UMBRELLA INSURANCE POLICY The City Manager introduced the next agenda item by indicating that it was staff recommendation that the City not purchase Umbrella Insurance Policy. The Director of Finance reviewed the current situation relative to general liability and property coverages concurred by the City. He noted that our current carrier for the Umbrella coverage, Integrity Insurance Company, has notified us that they will not h renew our Umbrella coverage as of May 19, 1985. Now we are currently paying an annual premium of $10,000 for five million dollars insurance coverage on all City risks. He noted that our insurance agent has tried to place our coverage with other companies but to date had not been successful. We received one proposal that would provide one million dollars in coverage for $45,000. It was the opinion of the Finance Director that the potential liability did not warrant the excessive cost of the insurance. The Finance Director recommended that the Council not purchase additional insurance. Following a general discussion, there was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to not approve the purchase of additional Umbrella Insurance. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT The City Manager introduced the next agenda item indicating that the proposed Joint Powers Agreement before the Council would provide for transportation service for the seniors age 60 and up. For the most part, the service would be a variable fixed route. In the beginning people will be transported from known areas of high senior concentration such as apartment complexes, to recreation activities, congregate dining and shopping areas. The City Manager noted that the City would have the opportunity to opt out of the program at the end of each year. Councilmember Theis inquired as to the type of report the City would get back. The City Manager indicated that the City of New Hope is taking the lead and that the City would receive information relative to the usage, cost and number of people using the service of people. He also indicated there would be some opportunity to design the report as needed by the City. Councilmember Theis inquired if such a report would be available prior to the six budget meetings. The City Manager indicated that information would not be available because the system would not be up and running at that point in time. Following a general discussion, there was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve the proposed Joint Powers Agreement. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. LICENSES There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve the following list of licenses: CATERING FOOD VEHICLE LICENSE Bridgeman's 6201 Brooklyn Blvd. CIGARETTE LICENSE Video Review 5810 Xerxes Ave. N. 5 -20 -85 -11- FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE Sridgeman's Brookdale Center B. C. American Little League 6800 France Ave. N. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops Brookdale Center Good Earth Restaurant Westbrook Mall 'Hickory Farms Brookdale Center 1 Potato 2 Brookdale Center Perkins Cake & Steak 5915 John Martin Dr.. Rocky Rococo Brookdale Center T. J. Applebee's Brookdale Center Uncle Bob's Quick 6 6600 West River Road MECHANICAL SYSTEMS LICENSE Hayes Contractor's Inc. 1010 Currie Ave. NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE Coca Cola Bottling 1189 Eagan Ind. Rd. Ganto's Brookdale Center Royal Crown Beverage Co. P.O. Box 43466 American Bakeries 4215 69th Ave. Ansari Abrasives, 4811 Dusharme Dr. Denne's Market 6912 Brooklyn Blvd. Eye Works 5900 Shingle Cr. Pkwy. Holiday Inn 1501 Freeway Blvd. Industrial Metal Fab. 2255 49th Ave. N. Kruger Galleries 6045 Brooklyn Blvd. Lutheran Church of the Master 1200 69th Ave. N. Marksman Metal 6801 Shingle Cr. Pkwy. Northport Elementary 5421 Brooklyn Blvd. North Star Dodge 6800 Brooklyn Blvd. Poly Optics 6800 Shingle Cr. Pkwy. Red Owl Country Y 3600 63rd Ave. N. Twin City Hose 2700 Freeway Blvd. RENTAL DWELLING LICENSE Renewal: Anna May Turnacliff 6507 Ewing Ave. N. Mike Sonnack 6637 Humboldt Ave. N. Jerry Fischer 4700, 04 Lakeview Ave. Tracy Rice 6907 Morgan Ave. N. Lawrence R. Florian 857, 861 70th Ave. N. Robert W. Rode 869 70th Ave. N. S. Richard Silverness 873, 877 70th Ave. N. James R. Hokanson 881 88 0th Ave. 57 N. v SWIMMING POOL LICENSE Lyn River Apartments 201 65th Ave. N. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Scott to 5 -20 -85 -12- i adjourn the meeting. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. The Broo yn Ce ter City Council adjourned at 10:10 p.m. uty CitT Clerk May r ! 5 -20 -85 -13-