The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1990 09-10 CCP Regular Session CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SEPTEMBER 10, 1990 7 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Open Forum 5. Approval of Consent Agenda -All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 6. Approval of Minutes: *a. August 13, 1990 - Regular Session b. September 4, 1990 - Special Session 7. Performance Bond Releases: *a. Earle Brown Farm Patio Homes, 6800 York Place *b. Hardee's Restaurant, 1601 Freeway Boulevard 8. Resolutions: *a. Amending the 1990 General Fund Budget to Reappropriate Funds for Lobbying for Group Home Siting Process b. Creating the Brooklyn Center Communication's Committee and Defining Its Purpose and Composition c. Relating to Animal Control: Authorizing Membership of the City in Pets under Police Security (PUPS) *d. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation for the Dedicated Public Service of Richard E. Nordstrom e. Approving Specifications for Removal of Houses on 69th Avenue, Improvement Project No. 1990 -21 *f. Accepting Work Performed under Contract 1990 -A, 1990 Sealcoating Program *g. Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract for Xerxes Avenue Sidewalk, Improvement Project No. 1990 -19, Contract 1990 -I CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- September 10, 1990 *h. Declaring a Public Nuisance and Ordering the Removal of Diseased Shade Trees (Order No. DST 9/10/90) *i. Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to Execute a Third Party Agreement for Operation of the Year XV Single - Family Housing Rehab Program j. Authorizing the Transfer of Unclaimed Property from Police Property Storage to the Park and Recreation Department *k. Declaring Surplus Property 9. Ordinance: (7:30 p.m.) a. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Minnesota State Building Code -This item was first read on August 13, 1990, published in the City's official newspaper on August 22, 1990, and is offered this evening for a second reading. 10. Planning Commission Item: (7:45 p.m.) a. Planning Commission Application No. 90024 submitted by Brookdale Office Park requesting preliminary plat approval and site plan amendment to alter the common property line between the Brooklyn Crossing Office Building at 3300 County Road 10 and the Multi- building parcel to the east. The purpose of the replat and the plan amendment is to accommodate medical tenants on both sites. -This item was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its August 30, 1990, meeting. 11. Public Hearings Regarding Proposed Special Assessments (8 p.m.) NOTICES OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS REGARDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED OR IMPROVEMENTS MADE HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED IN THE CITY'S OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER. INDIVIDUAL NOTICES HAVE ALSO BEEN SENT TO THE OWNERS OF ALL PROPERTIES AGAINST WHICH IT IS PROPOSED TO LEVY SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. a. Public Hearing Regarding the Proposed Special Assessments for Tree Removal Costs 1. Resolution Deleting One Assessment from Proposed Levy #11786 2. Resolution Deleting One Assessment from Proposed Levy #11787 3. Resolution Certifying Tree Removal Cost to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- September 10, 1990 b. Public Hearin Regarding II g the Proposed Special Assessments for Delinquent Public Utility Accounts 1. Resolution Certifying Delinquent Public Utility Accounts to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls C. Public Hearing Regarding the Proposed Special Assessments for Weed Destruction 1. Resolution Certifying Weed Destruction Charges to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls d. Public Hearing Regarding the Proposed Special Assessments for Public Utility Hookup p Charges 1. Resolution Certifying Public Utility Hookup Charges to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls r e. Public Hearing Regarding the Proposed Special Assessments for Alley Improvement Project No. 1989 -08, Fremont /Girard, 55th to 57th Avenues 1. Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Improvement Project 1989 -08 to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls f. Public Hearing Regarding the Proposed Special Assessments for Alley Improvement Project 1989 -15, Girard /Humboldt, 54th to 55th Avenues 1. Resolution Amending One Assessment on Proposed Levy #11791 2. Resolution Providing for Deferment of Portions of Special Assessments on Proposed Levy #11791 3. Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Improvement Project 1989 -15 to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls g. Public Hearing Regarding the Proposed Special Assessments for Alley Improvement Project 1989 -16, Emerson /Fremont, 53rd to 54th Avenues 1. Resolution Providing for Deferment of a Portion of One Assessment on Proposed Levy #11792 2. Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Improvement Project 1989 -16 to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -4- September 10, 1990 h. Public Hearing Regarding the Proposed Special Assessments for Alley Improvement Project 1989 -17, Lakeview /Twin Lake, Lakebreeze to Lakeside Avenues 1. Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Improvement Project 1989 -17 to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls i. Public Hearing Regarding the Proposed Special Assessments for Street Improvement Project 1988 -18, West River Road 1. Resolution Providing for Deferment of Certain Special Assessments and Deleting those Assessments from Proposed Levy #11799 2. Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for Improvement Project 1988 -18 to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls j. Public Hearing Regarding the Proposed Special Assessments for Street Improvement Projects 1989 -26 and 1989 -27 Freeway/65th/66th and Humboldt Avenue 1. Resolution Certifying Special Assessments for 0 Improvement Projects 1989 -26 and 1989 -27 to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls 12. Discussion Items: a. Business Ethics Policy b. Review of Replies to Date to Tree Replacement Survey c. Northwest Cable Commission Update *13. Licenses 14. Adjournment MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION AUGUST 13, 1990 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Celia Scott, Todd Paulson, Jerry Pedlar, and Philip Cohen. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Works Sy Knapp, Finance Director Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning and Inspection Ron Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, City Engineer Mark Maloney, Public Works Coordinator Diane Spector, and Personnel Coordinator Geralyn Barone. INVOCATION The invocation was offered by Elaine Bernards, chairperson of the Mayor's Prayer Breakfast Committee. OPEN FORUM Mayor Nyquist noted the Council had received one request to use the open forum session this evening. He recognized George Watts, 6125 Kyle Avenue North, who said he has resided in Brooklyn Center for the last 21 years. He said in the last three to four weeks, high winds and a rain storm broke off the top of a tree on the boulevard of his property. Mr. Watts said he called the City and was informed this was his tree. He asked why the City has trimmed it for the last 21 years if it is his tree. He said he was concerned about his liability if the portion of the tree fell and hurt someone. Mr. Watts said he spent $65 having a tree removal company trim the broken branches. Mr. Watts requested the City reimburse him for part of the cost for removal of the branches. The Director of Public Works said he was informed about this last Friday, and he asked the City Council for an opportunity to review the issue in more detail. Mr. Watts said this was fine with him as long as he receives some sort of a response from the City. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Nyquist inquired if any Councilmembers requested any items removed from the consent agenda. Councilmember Pedlar requested 9e and 9f be removed from the consent agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 23 1990 - REGULAR SESSION There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Paulson to approve the minutes of the July 23, 1990, City Council meeting. The motion passed unanimously. MAYORAL APPOINTMENTS There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Paulson 8/13/90 -1- to appoint election judges for the September 11, 1990, primary election. The motion passed unanimously. SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT APPROVAL There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Paulson to approve the subdivision agreement for Richardson Park 2nd Addition (Olive Garden Restaurant). The motion passed unanimously. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Paulson to approve the final plat for Richardson Park 2nd Addition ( Olive Garden Restaurant). RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION N0, 90 -156 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1989 -E - NORTH LILAC DRIVE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -157 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -16, CONTRACT 1990 -G, CONSTRUCTION OF WELL HOUSE NO. 10 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -158 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH SEH, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RELATING TO 69TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -10 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -159 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF DISEASED SHADE TREES (ORDER NO. DST 8/13/90) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. 8/13/90 -2- RESOLUTION NO. 90 -160 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PURCHASE OF A DOT MATRIX PRINTER The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -161 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION DECLARING SURPLUS PROPERTY The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -162 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN HENNEPIN COUNTY AND THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR THE YEAR XVI URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. LICENSES There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Paulson to approve the following list of licenses: GARBAGE AND REFUSE COLLECTION VEHICLE Aagard Sanitation 875 Prior Ave. N. Darling & Co. P. 0. Box 12785 Midwest Grease Buyers, Inc. P. 0. Box 26 Robbinsdale Transfer 3601 48th Ave. N. T t L Sanitation 8201 Logan Ave. N. ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Brookdale Unocal 76 5710 Xerxes Ave. N. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS A- Aaron's div. of Waste Inc. 2511 Highway 7 Master Mechanical, Inc. 9864 James Circle McQuillan Bros. Plumbing & Htg. Co. 452 Selby Ave. PERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE C. D. Flodstrom 5200 77th Ave. N. SIGN HANGER Crosstown Sign Inc. 10166 Central Ave. NE SPECIAL FOOD HANDLING ESTABLISHMENT 8/13/90 -3- Neatables 5900 Shingle Ck. Pkwy. SWIMMING POOL Chippewa Park Apartments 6507 Camden Ave. N. TAXICAB Blue and White 1086 East York The motion passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 7 1990 - SPECIAL SESSION There was a motion by Councilmember Paulson and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve the minutes of the August 7, 1990, City Council meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Pedlar abstained from voting. _RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED) The City Manager presented a Resolution Approving Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 1990 -A, Sealcoating Project No. 1990 -08. The City Manager reviewed the proposal and said if there is further peeling of any of the roadway, the City will deal with these sections as problems occur. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -163 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. 1990 -A, SEALCOATING PROJECT NO. 1990 -08 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Jerry Pedlar, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Relating to MNDOT Study of I -94 between Brooklyn Boulevard and I -494. Councilmember Pedlar commented that he saw someone fall off a section of the Xerxes Avenue sidewalk (south of the 1 -94 bridge) that had buckled. The Director of Public Works said he was not aware of this and will check into it. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -164 Member Jerry Pedlar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO MNDOT STUDY OF I -94 BETWEEN BROOKLYN BOULEVARD AND I -494 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Accepting Work Performed under Improvement Project No. 1990 -18 - Well No. 5 Repairs. Councilmember Pedlar referred to minutes of the July 23, 1990, City Council meeting in which staff referenced well No. 8 and its problems. He asked when there will be a report back to the Council on well No. 8. The Director of Public Works said this would be ready in September. Councilmember Pedlar asked if the City intends to conduct a comparable evaluation of all of its wells. The Director of Public Works said there is no need to do this because other wells do not have problems 8/13/90 -4- similar to those of well No. 8. Councilmember Pedlar expressed concern for the expense of making corrections to well No. 5. The Director of Public Works noted each well is checked every five to seven years, which is on a rotating schedule. One to two wells are checked each year with an expense of $15,000- $20,000 to rehabilitate each well after it has been checked. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -165 Member Jerry Pedlar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -18 - WELL NO. 5 REPAIRS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Philip Cohen, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Establishing Health Insurance Program. He said the current program for retirees will expire at the end of this year, and the City Council had requested an opportunity to review the program prior to expiration. The Director of Finance said the only real change of the current program is a provision which allows retirees who established residency out of Minnesota to continue participation in the program by having the City pay the single premium to an out -of -state insurance carrier. He noted the current insurance carriers served by the City have service areas only in Minnesota. The Director of Finance said the estimated cost of the program is $15,000 each year for a total cost of approximately $76,000 for a five -year period. The last program cost approximately $25,000. The Director of Finance said the City of Brooklyn Center's employees retirement fund has a balance of approximately $800,000 and earns about $60,000 a year in interest. Councilmember Scott asked if employees must be eligible for full retirement benefits and asked if employees would not be able to participate in this program if they took early retirement. The Director of Finance responded that employees are eligible to retire under PERA at age 62 or with a rule of 90 (service years plus age), and police officers can retire at age 55. An employee who retires without full benefits would not be eligible for the program. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -166 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING RETIREMENT HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Approving Purchase of Fax Machine and Computer Workstation and Authorizing Transfer of Funds from Drug Forfeiture Monies. Councilmember Pedlar said $8,400 will be left for training, and he asked what the total cost of training is. The City Manager said the cost is $10,000, but some employees on staff will be doing some of the training. RESOLUTION NO 90 -167 Member Philip Cohen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 8/13/90 -5- r RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1990 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING FORFEITED PROPERTY FUNDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE FAX MACHINE AND ONE COMPUTER WORKSTATION FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Jerry Pedlar, and the motion passed unanimously. ORDINANCE The City Manager presented An Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Minnesota State Building Code. He noted this item is offered this evening for a first reading. Councilmember Cohen asked if the provisions of the ordinance are not retroactive so any practices regarding sprinklers would not be voided. The City Manager said the ordinance relates to new structures only and does not impact existing structures. Councilmember Pedlar asked under what building code the City is currently operating. The Director of Planning and Inspection said it is the 1987 building code. Councilmember Pedlar asked which fire code the City is using, and the Director of Planning and Inspection said he believes it is the 1979 code. The City Manager said the Fire Department is working to update the fire code, and Councilmember Pedlar said he encourages this update. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to approve for a first reading An Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Minnesota State Building Code and setting a public hearing date of September 10, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEMS CITY HALL STUDY The City Manager said staff is requesting authorization to proceed with further analysis of building needs. The Director of Public Works referenced his memorandum in the agenda packet and reviewed it for the City Council. He recommended the City Council approve the use of an architect to develop a long term plan looking at space allocation. The City Manager said the City should be sure that what it spends in the short run will not be wasted in the long run. Councilmember Paulson asked if there is any kind of time conflict for staff to generate the space needs information in- house. The City Manager said the City can use information that departments have already compiled, but the City needs help on a planning design scheme and how to best utilize space. Councilmember Cohen noted the report said a minimum of 4,000 square feet is needed immediately. He said he understands a number of other city halls have been completely gutted and made more functional, a consideration not beyond the realm of possibilities. Councilmember Cohen noted the City Council will have an opportunity to consider a formal proposal in the future when concerns can be fully addressed. He added he has no problems looking for a proposal at this time and noted if the City agrees a study should be made, the next step would be to solicit proposals. If the Council were to accept a proposal, then a session to discuss it should be scheduled. Mayor Nyquist inquired if a study session should precede the request for proposals. The City Manager said the City Council can proceed either way. 8/13/90 -6 Councilmember Pedlar suggested bringing a space consultant in to discuss how to solve the City's short range space problems. Councilmember Pedlar expressed concern with having a consultant come in and tell the City how to use the 4,000 square feet. The City Manager noted some interim improvements are needed, so if it is possible to avoid wasting costs as related to long term improvements, this would be best. Mayor Nyquist suggested the City could get out of the municipal liquor business and use the space from those buildings. Councilmember Pedlar asked what the cost of leasing space is, and the City Manager said for the space needed to handle an interim situation, the annual cost would be approximately $60,000. He noted moving part of the organization to an off -site location would be very expensive to do for more than a year or two. He suggested trying to use what we have to make it more functional. Councilmember Paulson said he is not entirely convinced there is a need to expand and feels we can use our own resources. He supports the suggestion to have a study session to look at the scope of a proposal before soliciting requests. Councilmember Scott said there is no doubt in her mind that some City departments are drastically in need of space. Her concern is to not lose money on temporary solutions. She noted the department heads have put a great deal of time into studying this already. She does not think it is feasible to use closets and hallways and feels the City Council needs to discuss this more. She said she would support a City Council meeting to review and discuss any proposals. Councilmember Cohen said he feels the space in City hall is being utilized to its best capacity and suggested a work session be scheduled to discuss this further. The City Manager said he will attempt to schedule a special meeting of the City Council within the next 30 days to discuss City hall expansion needs. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 90015 SUBMITTED BY TEASDALE AND ASSOCIATES REQUESTING VARIANCE APPROVAL TO ALLOW MORE THAN TEN PERCENT OF THE GARDEN CITY COURT APARTMENT PROJECT TO BE THREE - BEDROOM UNITS FOLLOWING A CONVERSION OF 24 TWO- BEDROOM UNITS TO 16 THREE - BEDROOM UNITS The City Manager noted this item was recommended for denial by the Planning Commission at its July 26, 1990, meeting. The Director of Planning and Inspection referred the City Council to the Planning Commission minutes of June 14, 1990, pages five through eleven, and the attached information sheet to those minutes. He also referenced the July 26, 1990, minutes of the Planning Commission, pages one through four, and the information sheet attached to the minutes. The Director of Planning and Inspection said following a public hearing on July 26, 1990, at the Planning Commission meeting the Commission recommended denial of the variance, and he reviewed the reasons for denial. He said the Planning Commission recommended the City Council review the ten percent rule regarding three - bedroom apartment units. He noted a public hearing is scheduled this evening and the applicant is present. Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 90015. Mayor Nyquist recognized Harold Teasdale, who identified himself as the applicant. He said he is in agreement that the action requested is not a variance, and the ordinance should be changed. Mr. Teasdale suggested opposition to his application which revolves around management of 8/13/90 -7- apartments and not the fact there will be three - bedroom units. He said there is a concern regarding the number of people who will live in the apartments but pointed out there will be a decrease in the number of units. He asked if it is appropriate for children to live in walk -out apartments and noted there is demand for apartments that allow children. He said the fact is that children do live in apartments. Councilmember Paulson said he felt the current management is doing all right and questioned whether or not the facility will continue to be well managed. Mr. Teasdale said he is not criticizing current management. Councilmember Paulson asked what the rent is for a three - bedroom apartment. Mr. Teasdale said it is approximately $500 -$600 each month. Councilmember Pedlar asked if the applicant would pursue this project if rehabilitation grants were no longer available. Mr. Teasdale said he felt some sort of rehabilitation money should be available for him to continue involvement in this project. Councilmember Pedlar asked the applicant if he is involved in these projects in other communities. Mr. Teasdale said he is not involved in this particular type of conversion from two to three - bedroom units, although, he is a partner in about five other apartment complexes in the metropolitan area. Councilmember Paulson asked Mr. Teasdale if he agreed that the variance should be denied. Mr. Teasdale said the application does not appear to meet the current criteria, and he believes the ordinance should be changed. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to close the public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 90015. The motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Pedlar said he agrees with the former City Council, the former City Manager, City staff, the Planning Commission and area residents that the application should be denied. There was a motion by Councilmember Paulson and seconded by Councilmember Scott to deny Planning Commission Application No. 90015. Councilmember Cohen said he feels there should be a resolution that accompanies the denial in case the City is challenged in the future. He said the City has an outstanding record in dealing with housing needs and suggests further study is necessary to address additional housing needs for families. He suggested amending the motion to direct staff to prepare a resolution denying Planning Commission Application No. 90015 and include in the resolution direction to study the issue further. He suggested points to note in the resolution would include the following information: history leading up to action taken in 1973; Brooklyn Center has addressed the needs to house families in the City's comprehensive plan; Brooklyn Center has provided for affordable rental units, and the City has the second highest number of Section 8 voucher units in the metro area; the pending surplus of single- family "starter homes" could well meet the needs of families and increasing three - bedroom apartment units would further add to the surplus; the City should P y examine the future demographics to determine the need for three - bedroom apartment units in the next ten years; the City should examine the total effect on the apartment rental inventory in Brooklyn Center if the percentage of three - bedroom units is raised from ten percent to twenty -five percent; the need for additional open space or other internal space considerations to accommodate family needs; and what the future of these units will be should the federal government terminate the low income housing credits 8/13/90 -8- as it has cut other tax code related housing incentives. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Scott to amend the motion made by Councilmember Paulson to draft a resolution denying the application and based on the Planning Commission recommendation and City Council findings, the City should study the City Council's continuing concern regarding the need for shelter. Councilmember Paulson said he first wants to vote on the variance denial and then direct staff to conduct a study with a separate action. He wants to divorce the general policy from the specifics. Councilmember Cohen said he has no problems doing that, and he is just trying to set the record and make it as complete as possible. The City Attorney said the variance denial should have a resolution for the record. He said he has no problem with two separate resolutions that would include a second resolution setting the record and requesting further study on this. The City Manager agreed that it makes good sense to have a denial resolution for the record. Councilmember Cohen withdrew his motion amending the original motion made by Councilmember Paulson, and Councilmember Scott said she agrees with the withdrawal. Upon vote being taken on the motion to instruct staff to prepare a resolution denying the variance as recommended by the Planning Commission, the motion passed unanimously. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to refer to the Housing Commission for study the issue of the ten percent limit on three - bedroom apartments, and this referral should be made formal in a resolution. Councilmember Cohen suggested a historical perspective plus future demographics, current housing, and research on future liability of funding for three - bedroom apartments should all be included in the study by the Housing Commission. He said all the information he is suggesting be studied is available, and it is a matter of assimilating the data. Councilmember Paulson said he feels the City is already in the process of looking at housing. Councilmember Cohen asked Councilmember Paulson if he is concerned that by adopting the resolution the City is doing something out of sequence. Councilmember Paulson expressed concern about having short -term decisions made when the Housing Commission is trying to look at a long -term issue. Councilmember Cohen said the intent of his motion is to incorporate this study with the total housing implementation study. Upon vote being taken on the foregoing motion, the motion passed unanimously. RECESS The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 8:28 p.m. and reconvened at 8:45 p.m. DISCUSSION ITEMS (CONTINUED) COMMUNICATIONS AUDIT 8/13/90 -9- I The City Manager said the City has received the communications audit report from Coleman and Christison as commissioned by the City Council. Councilmember Cohen said he will abstain from voting because of a possible conflict of interest. He asked the City Council to allow him to ask questions. Mayor Nyquist said Councilmember Cohen will have this privilege if no one objects. The City Attorney noted this question came up in January as to whether or not there is a conflict of interest for Councilmember Cohen. He said Coleman and Christison has as a wholly owned subsidiary the company that employs Councilmember Cohen. He noted Councilmember Cohen has no ownership in these companies and said he is free to vote on the issue because there is no conflict of interest. He further noted that Councilmember Cohen may wish to abstain from voting if he so chooses. Mayor Nyquist recognized Steve Miller, who said he is an account executive with Coleman and Christison. He said the firm was asked to conduct a communications audit and thanked the City Council for commissioning Coleman and Christison to do this. He also thanked the City staff, City Council, and residents of Brooklyn Center for contributing to information used to compile the audit. Mr. Miller proceeded to review the audit process, identifying the problem, solution, and goals. Councilmember Paulson asked if Mr. Miller could provide a list of the people who participated in the focus groups, and Mr. Miller said he will have to discuss this request with City staff prior to releasing this information. Mr. Miller proceeded to review some media facts regarding the Brooklyn Center Post, Star Tribune, and cable television. Mayor Nyquist asked if there is any information regarding how many people watch local programming on cable television. Mr. Miller said a survey conducted by Decision Resources Limited includes viewership statistics, but the survey results are not broken down by city. Councilmember Cohen noted if City Council meetings are televised, there would be only approximately 250 -350 maximum viewers. Mr. Miller noted this may be a liberal estimation. He noted the number of choices available to viewers is large and said local programming is not usually watched intentionally but rather is come upon by channel flipping. Mr. Miller said currently cable television is not cost effective but may be at some future point. Councilmember Cohen suggested the advantage of having City Council meetings on cable television is that citizens can get information quickly and accurately, and information is not left up to someone's interpretation. Councilmember Paulson inquired if there was any recommendation on what to do with cable television, and Mr. Miller said cable is recommended as a third or fourth priority because it is not cost effective in terms of the City Council's goal of reaching a large number of households. The City Manager said a major factor regarding cable television has been penetration, and it is not a cheap media to operate if you are going to do it well. Councilmember Scott noted the study shows the residents the City is not reaching; younger residents would be even less apt to be reached by cable television. Mr. Miller agreed and pointed out the younger residents are part of the changing nature of the City. Mayor Nyquist asked if information is available regarding circulation versus readership for the written media. Mr. Miller said this information is not available, although, the Decision Resources Limited survey said fifty percent of those surveyed read the Brooklyn Center PostNews. Mr. Miller reviewed statistics collected by a survey conducted by Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council which included questions regarding communications. 8/13/90 -10- Mr. Miller proceeded to review recommendations and described each of them. Councilmember Paulson asked what Coleman and Christison`s recommendation would be with regard to a City news tabloid if there is a full circulation newspaper in the City. Mr. Miller noted a section of the newspaper could be developed into a regular City section. He noted the firm did not take Northwest News into consideration during the study because of its brief tenure. He said if this becomes a regular newspaper, it may be an option for the study. He pointed out a number of people in the focus groups mentioned Northwest News as a resource. Councilmember Paulson asked if this would work if the Brooklyn Center PostNews went into full circulation. Mr. Miller said he is not sure he understands the editorial perspective of the Brooklyn Center PostNews and has some problem with publishing a section which may not clearly identify from where it comes. He said there are some ethical questions that would have to be answered. Councilmember Paulson said he spent a lot of time talking about his concerns with Mr. Miller and does not see a lot of what he said in the report. He noted enlisting citizen participation was one of his concerns and asked how the report addresses the concern of engaging in a dialogue with residents. Mr. Miller said the City must first establish a foundation and noted a newsletter done well will provide access for interaction. He added in a complaint system and phone message system, people are encouraged to make comments. He suggested cable television is not interactive yet because it does not provide for feedback. Councilmember Cohen noted the recommendation for delivery of the news tabloid would be use of the post office as opposed to hand delivery on the doorstep. Mr. Miller said the current delivery system does not reach apartments and businesses. He suggested the swim club would be used to continue delivery of the park and recreation brochure, and he noted this brochure should be divorced from the newsletter. Councilmember Paulson said the study is well done and makes good recommendations. He suggested a communications advisory committee be formed to enlist help from citizens an important first step. Councilmember Pedlar left the council chambers at 9 :27 p.m. and returned at 9:30 p.m. There was a motion by Councilmember Paulson and seconded by Councilmember Scott to direct staff to prepare a recommendation on forming a Communications Advisory Commission. Councilmember Scott suggested the commission's membership include residents, City staff, and members of the business community. Councilmember Paulson suggested allowing staff to provide a proposal to bring before the City Council. The City Manager said information from other cities who have similar commissions will be collected in preparing the information for the City Council. Upon vote being taken on the foregoing motion, the motion passed. Councilmember Cohen abstained from voting on the motion. EVALUATION REPORT REGARDING LIFT STATION NO. 2 The City Manager noted SEH, Inc. has prepared a report which describes three alternates for upgrading or replacing the lift station located at Lyndale and 8/13/90 -11- 55th Avenues North. He noted the choices available to the City Council are laid out in the report prepared by the Engineering Department. The Director of Public Works briefly reviewed the three specific alternatives, their costs, and the advantages and disadvantages of each. He noted the first two options are remodeling alternatives, and the third option would be complete replacement of the lift station. Mayor Nyquist recognized John Stodola from SEH, Inc., who said some of the problems of the existing lift station relate to odor. He said alternate C would best handle this problem. Councilmember Cohen asked about location of the building if alternate C is chosen, and the Director of Public Works said the new lift station would be built on the property south of the existing lift station. Councilmember Cohen asked about the by -pass system if alternates A or B are selected versus alternate C. The Director of Public Works noted there would be a brief switch over period for alternate C. The City Manager noted the lift station is in a sensitive location near the Minneapolis water inlet. He said with a by -pass, there is greater risk that an incident could occur. Councilmember Scott said this lift station reminds her of a well with which the City has had problems. She expressed concern about alternates A and B that would pump for 24 hours at a time, noting there are a lot of people in the neighborhood who have varying hours and would not be happy with twenty -four hour pumping. She expressed concern about the risk for an accident near the Minneapolis water inlet and feels alternates A and B do not solve all of the problems. She said the building is still an old facility with safety and maintenance problems. Councilmember Scott said alternate C would give the neighborhood a good feeling about Brooklyn Center which it does not have right now. She said in order to be cost effective, the City should select the permanent solution, so she would like to see alternate C selected. Councilmember Pedlar and the Director of Public Works discussed how the odor control problem would be resolved in each of the alternates. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Scott to establish a project for lift station No. 2 selecting alternate C with $547,200 as the estimated project cost. The motion passed unanimously. ALTERNATE FUNDING SOURCES FOR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM COSTS The City Manager said staff had been requested to look at alternate sources of revenue for financing City expenses. The Director of Public Works referenced the memorandum prepared by the Public Works Coordinator and proceeded to review it in detail. Councilmember Scott thanked the Public Works Coordinator for her excellent report which is concise and easy to read. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Cohen to accept the recommendation of the City staff to establish a storm water utility. The motion passed unanimously. T.H. 100 RECONSTRUCTION The City Manager said there is very preliminary information available regarding T.H. 100 reconstruction, and staff is looking for authorization to hold a Brooklyn Center informational hearing prior to the general public hearing that 8/13/90 -12- the Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) will conduct on this project. The Director of Public Works reviewed his memorandum to the City Council and noted MNDOT will conduct an informational meeting on this in late September or early October. He suggested having staff conduct a public information meeting with Brooklyn Center residents who live in the area to inform them, develop opinions, and receive comments prior to the MNDOT meeting. Councilmember Scott noted there is nothing in the agenda packet regarding segment 2 of the project, and the Director of Public Works pointed out this segment is not located in Brooklyn Center, The Director of Public Works proceeded to review the five alternates for the Brooklyn Center portion of T.H. 100, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each. He noted not one of the alternates is a real winner in all respects, but at this point in time, the one with the best opportunity to serve the City is alternate E. There was brief discussion by the City Council, and Councilmember Pedlar expressed his dismay with the options presented. Councilmember Cohen said the City should work with MNDOT on this project so funding for it is not lost. Councilmember Scott noted some of the roadwork extends into neighborhoods and asked who would be responsible for installing new signal lights. The Director of Public Works said any changes required as a result of the design will be paid for by MNDOT. Councilmember Scott asked if Brooklyn Center representatives will be present at the MNDOT public hearing, and the Director of Public Works responded affirmatively. The City Manager said staff would like to hold a preliminary hearing with area residents. Councilmember Paulson asked what the purpose of the project is, and the Director of Public Works said it is to upgrade T.H. 100 to keep up with future traffic demands by improving traffic capacity and traffic safety. Councilmember Paulson asked if at some future date light rail transit is installed along the Soo Line to Brookdale, would this affect the T.H. 100 project. The Director of Public Works said he recognizes that light rail transit will pass through Robbinsdale, but he is not aware of any plans to have future spurs to Brookdale. The Director of Public Works asked if the City Council wishes to have staff proceed with a neighborhood information meeting, and the consensus of the City Council was to schedule the meeting. Councilmember Scott said the City has an obligation to meet with its residents prior to the MNDOT information meeting. 1991 PRELIMINARY BUDGET REVIEW The City Manager said the City Council has a preliminary report on the 1991 budget. He requested the Council to set a preliminary levy figure which can be lowered but cannot be raised, and a preliminary total budget figure which can be adjusted up or down. He said the recommended levy would increase taxes approximately $25 a year for the average homeowner in Brooklyn Center. The City Manager noted by December 28, 1990, the City must have its 1991 budget finalized. He said between November 15, 1990, and December 20, 1990, the City Council is required to hold a public hearing. He said the City Council will have work sessions to review the budget. Councilmember Cohen said that with the uncertainties in funding, there is no alternative but to levy the maximum amount available to the City. He expressed concern about selling off certificates of indebtedness and wondered if it will be necessary to do this next year, too. 8/13/90 -13- The City Manager said information regarding this can be provided to the City Council. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -168 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1991 PROPOSED BUDGET The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Philip ohen and the motion P o ion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -169 Member Philip Cohen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A PROPOSED TAX LEVY FOR 1991 BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Paulson to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 11 p.m. City Clerk Mayor 8/13/90 -14- MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL SESSION SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in special session and was called to order by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 11:25 a.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Todd Paulson and Philip Cohen. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Finance Director Paul Holmlund, and Administrative Aide Patti Page. The City Manager presented a Resolution Approving a Tax Levy for the Purpose of Defraying the Cost of Operation, Providing Informational Service, and Relocation Assistance Pursuant to the Provisions of MSA 469.001 through 469.047, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center for the Year 1991. He explained the City Council must consent to the proposed tax levy of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -181 Member Todd Paulson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING A TAX LEVY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION, PROVIDING INFORMATIONAL SERVICE, AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF MSA 469.001 THROUGH 469.047, OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR THE YEAR 1991 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Philip Cohen, and the motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Paulson to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 11:26 a.m. Mayor 9/4/90 _1_ CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number - 7cZY--.b REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Performance Guarantee Release DEPARTMENT APP L: Signature - title Director of Planning and Inspection MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: �' 4 No comments to supplement this report t> mments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached The following performance guarantee is recommended for release: 1. Earle Brown Farm Townhouses 6800 block of York Place 4 Planning commission Application No. 84031 Amount of Guarantee - $15,000 bond - Obligor Cyro Associates All landscaping for the units that have been built is in and viable. Parking spaces have been installed and striped. An as -built utility survey has been submitted and was approved by the City Engineer. Of the 12 units that were to be built in this project only 4 have been built. The area of the 8 undeveloped lots is in a condition that can be maintained by occasional mowing. The obligor wishes release of the bond at this time. A new bond will be required before building permits for the remaining units are issued. All improvements are in an acceptable state as of this time. Recommend total release. 2. Hardees 1601 Freeway Boulevard Planning Commission Application No. 89005 Amount of Guarantee - $35,000 bond Obligor - Paul S. Gray Co., Inc. All improvements are installed. Landscaping appears viable. Utility corrections have been made and an as -built utility survey has been submitted and was approved by the City Engineer. Recommend total release. Submitted by Gary Shallcross, Planner CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date 9110/90 Agenda Item Numbe REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1990 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REAPPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR LOBBYING FOR GROUP HOME SITING PROCESS DEPT. APPROVAL: sue:, Signature - City Manager ******************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Attached please find a copy of the August 14, 1989, minutes of the City Council documenting the City Council's approval of a work program for Boland and Associates to lobby on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center regarding the group home siting process. This action authorized $5,000 for that purpose in 1989. The attached resolution reappropriates $5,000 from the contingency fund as the billing processes for this work carried over into 1990, and we did not carry forward the appropriation. The 1989 appropriation lapsed. The attached resolution transfers $5,000 from the contingency fund to the City Council's Professional Services Account, thus reappropriating this $5,000 for payment in 1990. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend City Council's favorable consideration of the attached resolution. Trust. Police Chief Lindsay and EDA Coordinator Brad Hoffman entered the meeting at I 11:10 P.M. SELECTION OF A PROSECUTING ATTORNEY The City Manager explained a staff committee of five people was appointed to review the proposals received from 14 law firms. He noted the committee has reviewed the proposals and is forwarding the names of two firms which could provide quality prosecution services from the request for proposals submitted. He stated it is the committee and staff's recommendation to appoint the firm of Carson and Clelland as the City's prosecuting attorney. Mayor Nyquist stated he would like to caution the Council against making their decision based upon rates. He noted there are many differences in the rate structure and how they are billing their time. He added he would like to see a reasonable annual maximum dollar amount incorporated into the contract. He inquired if the City Manager had any type of recommendation for a reasonable maximum dollar amount. The City Manager stated he would like to have the committee review that point. He added that particular issue may have to be negotiated between the firm and the City. Councilmember Paulson stated from his own personal experience with people from both firms, he feels they are both well qualified to handle the 'City's prosecution services. He added, however, he felt more comfortable with the firm of Carson and Clelland. Councilmember Cohen stated he concurs with the recommendation of appointing Carson and Clelland as the City's prosecuting attorney. RESOLUTION NO Member ,Terry Pedlar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION REGARDING APPOIXrMENT OF CITY PROSECUTOR The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. GROUP HOME LEGISLATION - BROOKLYN CENTER INVOLVEMENT The City Manager stated he has reviewed with Boland and Associates the feasibility of its organization developing a work program for the last half of 1989, which would be directed at organizing a multicommunity and agency lobbying effort to modify group home legislation. He stated he does not believe the lobbying effort can be organized among interested governmental agencies without one community taking the lead and hiring someone to organize that effort. He stated he believes Brooklyn Center should take the lead in attempting this organization. He stated he is recommending the City Council authorize up to $5,000 for the legislative work proposed in the Boland and Associates work program document. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Cohen authorizing up to $5,000 for the legislative work proposed in the Boland and Associates work program document contained with this agenda packet. The motion passed unanimously. 8/14/89 -11- Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1990 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REAPPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR LOBBYING FOR GROUP HOME SITING PROCESS WHEREAS Section 7.09 of the City Charter of the City of Brooklyn Center does provide for a contingency appropriation as a part of the General Fund Budget, and further provides that the contingency appropriation may be transferred to any other appropriation by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized Boland and Associates to lobby on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center regarding the group home siting process; and WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized the expenditure of $5,000 for this purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to amend the 1990 General Fund Budget as follows: item: Increase the Appropriations for the following line ------------------------------------------------------- City Council Professional Services Account No. 4310 $5,000. item: Decrease the Appropriations for the following line ------------------------------------------------------- Unallocated Expenses Contingency Account No. 4995 $5 Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/lo/go Agenda Item Number F,b_ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION CREATING THE BROOKLYN CENTER COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE AND DEFINING ITS PURPOSE AND COMPOSITION DEPT. APPROVAL: bf&4&Dj� Personnel r in Coo d� ator Signature title ************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * ** 4+01* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below/attached- SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached — )U The city council recently received a report on a communications audit conducted by Coleman & Christison, Inc. One recommendation generated by the audit is to create an advisory communications committee comprised of members of the community, and the city council directed staff to prepare a proposal for creation of such a committee. A resolution creating the communications committee is attached. If the city council approves the resolution, the council will need to appoint the committee members. The city manager will designate a staff liaison to provide assistance to the committee as it evaluates the communications audit and other resources in order to prepare and present a recommended plan of action to the city council. With regard to the makeup of the committee membership, I contacted several cities that have utilized a communications committee and found some helpful information regarding the committee structure. Some cities used exclusively residents while others involved nonresident representatives. The chamber of commerce's executive director and /or president were involved in some, as was the communications director from the local school district. All included people who were professionals in the communications, advertising, or marketing fields at the time of their committee membership. Also participating were some advisory commissioners who had a stake in their city's communications efforts. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Pass a Resolution Creating the Brooklyn Center Communications Committee and Defining Its Purpose and Composition. �b Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CREATING THE BROOKLYN CENTER COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE AND DEFINING ITS PURPOSE AND COMPOSITION WHEREAS, in 1990, the Brooklyn Center City Council commissioned Coleman & Christison, Inc. to conduct a communications audit for the City of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, a recommendation generated as a result of the audit is to prepare a communications plan outlining communications improvements for the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to involve members of the community to develop a communications plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center that there is hereby established within the City of Brooklyn Center an ad hoc Communications Committee with the primary purpose of developing a communications plan of action for the City of Brooklyn Center. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the committee shall be appointed by the Mayor with majority consent of the City Council and shall serve until removed from the committee by voluntary resignation or by majority consent of the Mayor and City Council. The committee shall be composed of a chairperson and eight members. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the committee shall dissolve upon the submittal and presentation of its recommended plan of action to the City Council. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION RELATING TO ANIMAL CONTROL: AUTHORIZING MEMBERSHIP OF THE CITY IN PETS UNDER POLICE SECURITY (PUPS) DEPT. APPROVAL: fit! Personnel Coordinator Signature - tifle MANAGERS REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: x ` Z V No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached X ) Attached is an analysis of animal impound needs for seven metro area cities, including Brooklyn Center. The city council is being asked to approve a joint powers agreement that would create Pets Under Police Security (PUPS), an organization that would be responsible for oversight of an animal impound facility for these cities. The council is also requested to appoint a representative and an alternate from the City to serve on the PUPS executive board. The attached analysis provides a history of the City's involvement with impounding animals and an explanation of why PUPS is being created. Should the joint powers agreement be approved, the cities will proceed with construction of an animal impound facility. The analysis provides a breakdown of the capital, administrative, and animal costs to be incurred by each city for a new facility plus the formulas for how these costs will be divided amongst the cities. The City of Brooklyn Center can pay for capital costs by making a direct appropriation from its capital projects fund. Administrative costs can be covered by the animal control budget, which has a 1990 line item appropriation of $6,500 for Other Contractual Services. (This is the amount that in the past has been paid to Funk Animal Hospital for its services and which, no matter where the City goes in the future to impound animals, is expected to increase to at least the level cited in the attached analysis for PUPS operations and animal costs.) Most of the animal costs are charged back to pet owners with impound fees. (Under the existing policy, the City charges a $25 fee for each impounded animal plus a $5 a day room and board fee.) The annual average number of animals impounded by the City from 1986 to 1988 was 175. It is worth noting that several other cities, in addition to the original seven, have expressed some interest in joining PUPS. These cities include Wayzata, Plymouth, and Medina. If other communities join in with the original seven cities, the costs for Brooklyn Center will be reduced. Additional details regarding this may be available at the September 10, 1990, city council meeting. As you know, I have been representing Brooklyn Center on the animal impound facility search committee. I will be available to answer any questions the city council may have regarding this at its meeting. Because no other viable alternatives exist for the sensitive handling of our residents' pets, 1 will strongly urge the city council to approve the PUPS joint powers agreement so we may proceed with providing an adequate facility for these animals. As people become more sensitive to how their animals are handled, it seems this option will not only help the City to control its future animal control costs; it appears to be the best way we know how to guarantee appropriate handling of animals. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Pass a Resolution Relating to Animal Control: Authorizing Membership in Pets Under Police Security (PUPS). i �c Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO ANIMAL CONTROL: AUTHORIZING MEMBERSHIP OF THE CITY IN PETS UNDER POLICE SECURITY PUPS BE IT RESO LVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota: Section 1. Background: Findings 1.01. The City is authorized to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by conducting an animal control program (Program). The Program consists, among other things, of the impoundment of dangerous, stray, unlicensed, and unvaccinated animals. 1.02. The City has been unable to contract with a suitable private animal control agency to assist the City in the Program. g m. It is found and determined that it is necessary and desirable to provide for municipally owned and operated facilities to perform impoundment services under the Program. 1.03. Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59 (Act) authorizes the City to perform municipal functions by contract jointly with other political subdivisions of the State. The City has participated in a study of a joint animal impound facility conducted by the cities of Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Crystal, Golden Valley, Maple Grove, New Hope, and Robbinsdale (the Cities). The Cities have recommended the formation of an organization under the Act to be known as Pets Under Police Security (PUPS). 1.04. A form of contract (Contract) creating PUPS and setting forth its basic powers and duties has been presented to the Council. The Council has reviewed the Contract and a copy is on file with the Clerk. 1.05. It is found and determined that it is in the best interests of the City that the City execute and deliver the Contract. Section 2. Authorization: Findings 2.01. The Contract is approved. 2.02. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Contract on behalf of the City. RESOLUTION NO. 2.03. The Clerk is authorized and directed to deliver a certified copy of this resolution together with the executed contract to the City Clerk of the City of Crystal. Section 3. Representative Appointment 3.01. Police Chief Jim Lindsay is appointed the City's representative on the PUPS Board and Police Captain Scott Kline as alternate representative. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. PUPS (Pets Under Police Security) Analysis of Animal Impound Facility Needs for the Cities of: Crystal Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Golden Valley Maple Grove New Hope Robbinsdale THE HISTORY In the 70's many Metro Cities used an organization known as MAPSI (Municipal and Private Services Inc.) for animal control. MAPSI was the Minneapolis "dog catcher and dog pound." Over time, cities experienced problems with MAPSI in the areas of dog handling, costs, public relations, "billings,- etc. Due to the extensive problems they had Wit h ••MAPSI..many cities switched ' from .-MAPSI to Funk's .in the- late 70 j Funk'.s Animal Hospital, 7508 Jolly Lane, Brooklyn Park, was contracted to provide all animal impound services with the exception of the "dog catcher" role. Each city, .typically through the Police Department individually.or with other cities, hired'employees.to act As "dog catcher or animal_ warden.." This arrangement with Funk's worked very well for many years. On May 15, 1989, Dr. Funk sent letters to all cities using his animal hospital as an animal impound facility stating he would no longer be in the animal impound business effective September 1989. Dr. Funk wanted out of the impound business. His main reason being the bad public image a veterinarian gets running an animal impound facility. The other reason was his land value has increased and if he is made an offer to sell he may opt to do so. Staff from Crystal, Brooklyn Center, Maple Grove, and Brooklyn Park pleaded with Dr. Funk to remain at his facility on a month -to -month lease because no other animal impound facility was available in the area. Dr. Funk agreed to a month -to -month arrangement only if the cities provided staff to maintain the animal impound facility. Brooklyn Park agreed to use their CSO's to staff the animal impound portion of Dr. Funk's facility. The only ther facility available Y y a la le for use in the Northwest Metro Area for animal impound was Corcoran Pet Care Center. Corcoran, being a small facility, cannot handle the additional cities who have used Funk's. On July 18, 1990, Crystal and New Hope and other Metro Area Cities were informed that Corcoran is cancelling their animal impound services effective September 1990. THE STUDY In 1989 the Cities of Crystal, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Maple Grove, Robbinsdale, New Hope, and Golden Valley joined together to the animal impound problem. The Committee surveyed 159 veterinarians, kennels, and boarding facilities in the Metro Area asking the following: 1. Do you have a facility the cities could use? 2. Are you interested in building a facility for :us to .use ?. 3. Are you - interested in running a facility a city' would build? Out of 159 surveys sent, we received 60 responses. Two indicated we. could use their facility. The problem with this was their facilities were. located in St :.Cloud and Maple Plain,- Minnesota. The remainder of- responses were not interested in any involvement with cities and an animal impound facility. After review of the surveys and discussion with Hennepin County Animal Humane Society, and surveying cities in the Twin City Metro Area, the Committee decided to focus on finding property and building a facility. THE SITE After studying properties, cost and zoning in the seven cities on the Committee, Maple Grove purchased property adjacent to their public works building. Maple Grove needed the land for future public works /development use and would allow PUPS to purchase part of this land to build an animal impound facility. SC, Nunl.• Otlr• w ~ n __.. ry! _ A 1' e g stew. p � f t15 g r� ae1• .a er u L N o c ° 1 r..++a,� '� v�' e..iku 'ne t ) •' S '�;4 ^' 7 y .11 7 X S t 9100 it f .f7 •Y".I m .f r C ' 14". 4 id , t r t 4 �. ,"I y ° 1 •I r 0 r °' 1 + 'X'iie�l,. N. " e '. 'Ty7�.•��Y S 1 a d.. /� � JC7 tiv �,; a C ' ' ,. r �k'laifT �`r�SN• Y: /. r' � r , D, P !. �a .. � C • ►•en Len• N ° i� ry S� Cn v ' � � '�"}. l: 'C•n I A . ,. :.. I^c 17300 '. 1:3 � to Y. 11i�t � n. �� r? a rl f .!.• e - ,/ ••• , IC . • . D e N ." - •�:; �4 • - �. N { ...t .�.r. HoXY . .'. ,, 1i. .�'�F 7�r \�, ?rj l� ', �� `b.. �Y � '�, arke #+rR l y ; � i,�e 1 / DunkN len• _ �g Dunk Nklene " 9 S F � O l p dG t le f �.� � a �o -_ g , `�'�v R v � t f• < � ? ♦� P ?' �,t ,� °P,n.� zl, I► "�� .••� e z nrle.r r a � I � VIr•• • O` L,r1• N. C \� V1ek•Vwr9 L•n•13000 + v. �" .�1 p � 1 ; e � rte n.n ku. ' 1 •�'r l e o -_. '.. .r . �w,♦ .�_._ A - M� y .f � K y S� �� ', - ••Y a ,D � , , �w > ,,, .:;� , w•;7 ., d Zti ;r' 1ptl 4 ': 1 •' l ,' �1 i r� � ��•i Ir � • P.rk• /• NI• •r, L,. ..r NI•e.r, �M �� '•' � `v � :i t 3 "r' ,� � t,,;,r� i dr� r � 'r � a o r w i x . r ._ ;w r �� n. Y �, V `� � .. -. D Inner a •Y• fla. f "R �,' t (y `(l r�r r, ,�,5 v ^M � x ry ';� Y "V 'Yl � 8� a ��' (�r • O j� , r i z •'r - �e s � }k'` 4t4 hx� t} ffi l ?` , 1 �.i"� f� �� {��n1��,„ a .� , µt yI,I 1 n � /,. ;ij4. vl r ^I�izFl si f. [}I.� h is { '•'vf t } sl. i:' �� s�'` °. 1 s .,� �, ° _ s e' •r � '� un reek 1i�l�sgjH ' j�':!4 �. r j� ter r. ooz .S � - AY€ a �,,, h � �,pte '�` t t. d .�r,. �' , �, la.... I � � y r•rnn.eet t. ".,�-- -�1- -+ l(' pl q a x r 1C.. r rf �. r r �y. L •r t t y� r# y`�t, f ,, N r ►e � ' � cn•.nk. .rk.nlr o Man �'' �`"ai � li" �1 i rrp K � n , �5x1+� $rrR�k�• • rL W �M� �„ k 9�xl�ki ' � �'+� e c.ir. aa. •f. � « O , w nknn �L a +. /'.. �m �, �, �� c y �� Q�� Are. p +��' m 4,t+a. f �,� ( � s ri l S u « �'p�p� ,. N H z•nwm •n N. « r • �r or 1" vm K (+" Ir r 1 a �" 1 n pp n � a � � y l: �'� ♦ +i r 1 'Y for '. L p Y > ':'k •� ;� i 1 _ ( I �, 1 ,. `' � rt RIA•vi. ' • vin• I w 6,ne' N S r} 4 ,? "I'�di eW N(. 's a �•+` :� Yo m g w;r (a o �9"" '41�f�' # ' r ,;�, F� Gael S ul . • e e6 ten, N ''sj'At $ it , y„ t 1 P �,� �' kf 1 k ° r 8 x� ya••Y c ,.. , + . g r y, �� f� ' t k le`liy� p,�`"r +� p }�j#1� �., xS ,f y1,y �ne , uA•r •?t AyA '�� 1, " L.an.rr LIB" g 11 �s� °' '� .le C, +x?', i{ -1Qi� I '. ` uA iL - � W � •n ? � : [ � r � '$' 1 iy�� t� �y� * 9: 7 V! � �; � e( �• � r °_, � en•. ( P t � � j tr � I r « • to i�'�� @�rj Yip �r• }j, � •:.� W x � i ¢y' v. IJ nor Y w Y {�'� ",X '� � r Z G� � 14 r jC' I . ''M,�a�Q +�1 � l,r�, � � 1 � •� � rove -i „�i Z ° ° �i. 5r 8 s I 7 •, 2 � �{, y' , aC� �. ,_ �, ��d'�. � { yd 1 f r'• � � � - _ Ilo (p. . 1+. r''”. f e.t:' N a P, e mn.•r� l ri. P A • i r; e _ •n . ••o n [ v. r. : � o 1 - Z `�^ � r � 71n Ar.. !.(� • '� ° Nw 1 .,. b <� /'1(' ;�,.., ° t even. a Ar p W p d.N r n Y z A cd e, _ 8 wlnn•1k, y r M WI 1M• Ar• M n•IV• M r•. 00 + + _ I1'.. • .�_ pp A ,$1 er `r. aw•y A. z Q > G > ,� •s3. y 11A 6 C g w, i 1 �(fl Ll •RR //�� _ i � � i entuah d > erA` • v 3 nlu< 'Aw•r..J �" �� d Fy.e Leu1a i� �, L 1�1if1n`I�S Y �� r r _ j p e. er < , y ¢ > n q me ►w N Pb N O •ra•r Ar•. N I..Ar. 2 xa1r. x r� 1. U C ' � o r � e ' �" r �i: o d �•a't�l v \'\ `ti.. .Snnakv - u �lr'� t � AyM Ad r�..` �+ r1��4\ •. , p C ('d r o-t z.n• ' Are m r z.n• Aw. � � m d � ? N o od a7" ? r - s r, 7� 3 V b a .. r s I A 7• T. � f Yr •� - ' '�- r � C7pL ' ,y �� bo #1�� = y l .r� �r � � 1 3 � 3 41Y� x ,�"j r�, 1 r v.rn o - ■ 11„x.._. A I � t� y,+ L_ u 11r— W 4 ��6 ,� / k ��7,? A; o - c •r�, YY � 0 Op r t @ n1 y �) ., u � •u a•a.n1 •r.. � � Y 1 M d- 17 �., ;. O -_ � 5i F R• n1 Ar• r rr �prk � � �t3 Y {? s� O �`° • r" � "tx " Y —�� n O• k rtr O o�an, ('�d, � ° � 4 r Ur� Noe1• ^ A.• — Q Nenu Ar -�, O, N•e1. Ar• Nebl 1 , •, IJ �' I S �OC,r j"a 1. kSd l.k A oA �'x �'_� - B �t� y 1 I u y 4 ,yu:a et t �� r•. �o _ .r„a �� w�2 „�'. r.rnc• � P.. O Ild - E . c .fie Av N. a d M •xd. � W R r S7 Py'� ' r. . ° ay O e � NMti �. y � ;9 yM1. `D 5 + �."ai S `. 3 V+( ^• '^ ,, n ' er a ; .; � O 'fy ��, �Y } -� ^ [r .a e 7.n 1n p Ar• C e 9 y �,,y+��, 5y�i h' F) 1:I r...e• " , r r � _ // i 3 _ re•eo � ; rN A)r. � r { � � ah - : � J' ) ; l ; s n V " n (� _ \ '' - eY g !'G.p ) °II it AJ i .. /"�� i M•wto '�, Il ' �`S7 � o N P•nn u Av. � N. {ry w V•n C N•wlon � �,.. i. • i r. a �� n , ° z 1e > Ar•, N 1 � y., p 1(i I �umbele a Ar.. N_ (4�1 l rti.ti, 1e A p � . a a r� 1 l N•�� tJr n.Mem � � � V ��'''��'s M1i� 1 69>A' ' 'AV��N'rY � ,L� r • �' +� [.N IIR � �'� � Ar• N. � : d 4 �d a r! � , v Y 8ryn1 Av N / 3� > "J{ lA '% 2 •� •i y 'i t �( ...)� -1;� u sO L naa• un . 0 THE FACILITY The city managers from participating cities chose Roger Erickson from the Co- Partnership Architects to work on preliminary design of the PUPS facility. Roger has previous work with the public sector with the cities of Rockford, Cologne, Blooming Prairie, and as consulting architect for St. Peter State Hospital for over ten years. After months of working with the Committee, an animal impound facility was initially designed to meet the needs of the seven cities and to accommodate K -9. After cost evaluations of the planned facility, the separate K -9 kennel area was removed from the plan. - Facility size is planned at approximately 4,625 square feet. -There are plans for 20 large animal holding kennels. which can be:split to 40 at times of high use. -There is room for a maximum of 30 small animal kennels. The size of the proposed facility was determined by totalling animal impounds for each of the seven cities from.1985 through 1989. Calculations of.monthly averages. of animal impounds' 'for all cities combined were- then determined. The '"Monthly average figures combined with average length of stay per animal impounded helped 'to determine maximum and minimum kennel numbers needed to operate an animal impound facility for seven cities. 1' j/ I 0 _ r � x`��s�..:wrsr �II ',4.="�wC�•;lf�f�l�I •'•ylOW I. ^� P • � ��n. C ■ / ■ ■ ■■ ■ IM■ 11 t 11 1 Mlil •a r,-- �I ° =�, fit' ■ e. � � ii�; �ii� �� . �y;:.. �:!�rlf' =�I�1�1••; ,,� I I �� 11 �� r •. Illf e.r•j :; wIT \A = I 1 �r . a• � r j e • :;r:. �?r + - � � � " � 7i�� R� � � � ( 1 1 O�Oq' iwl��Il /r ,� .nom ;�.i��.��G•�•R�I ��IIII17��I 1+r ►�• f '� f IZ"if": i r t, � � ■ ■ u nnr J' '�• •M,v a •P9.Aq• AM �rll ur1 Unl r •►j'•T � r A .�•. I � ■ .■I ! 111 /` II .. �� . �� `a A , �, * av i - ,G,•'L�\ +.1 _' fa�� _ i �� k��aS •, 1. /' •... , .. ( 4a `�i11n...% J r =Its (a• �t /j •° • �',�.. �,� `�' ? '�r • ', N: Q. ,R' y �r 1 ' t a • •1 •. . / t y 5; I i.J' v' 1 + �apliS= I ;��^ay'• " =I j • INrd.... M 11 ,,,•,� '�• •� •��•.� TatN1`i t ! f' l a • + 4, _'' ti• �� + 7 "� q ;,� t L Y3 y ri° � 1 ' 1 .N I� �C1 1� j • / •'.1.•..11}\; �• r��, Grp ,,�;,� ltjlNti'�� /sled � "N fi ��° „o�• � fljr �� ( "i� •T�'�i�°�r1;E0M1.�`�"3't %lC,p e F f t•• rr l (p = +r � r il G,^„ . �:! 1:�� "o: \ ; r ( 1 'ii��..�.. �v '•�' •'ref /��lY�"a� \\ •� �'' +x• r� • , = �r^j;J• >: a.i:. ��„ - `L'� � a o�AiE'r•:j� ° .:.tl� •��w'� ,,��t ; Eft:. 1L��a��• i,�#'�f. ` i .:.•�':i3• j �:v'i'/Z'. :.. i,!• �/,. /I + � t' q (3 �; f ��j�ti�; �' L r /� /i /ice / ��•'r l � w !��y� . � "f1i' � • 7 ' a ` ( '�:' �� It I",'�•l a N • '" , �� a ` 'a "R� j Vii °• I l i'••�.��f ,• s`a �•.. !- r '�I�N - .4� -�i \ lN' I j )T (! �'.�,� �' rT'.r °� .. ..1�j .t••. �0.�: • �: 1\ ` 7 .4 r tk L rw. yl� . 11 t•0' 1. P / t •.+ + • `��R' \� 0'�w \�'.•^ PI�/Y— `,,l )r ` r• / � ,/Y,r: i ° ` . ff! y t Ir'' •w. C� • A; r �' • ,� \.��` �SLrela/;:• /1•: � Y.a• ir,ef J!i•/ Ir•:�.. J. .i •:° r.t el /lN N �r' w'"L �tir r �i • � t s'�'1 �7 �`.1, .,. .r A : �j �r tr..`�� hi 'I / ° ♦ �w►•i • � 4, a•�t+ r .( tl •, a ^* A..r „IL ,• s w fi r '•il rr , 7 1 r..« °�.!.-�1 .r � + � 1��.� �.1 �' r rPi • � 4��r � y �' '1 ,t'. �Fr� '•n'r 1' J• r t: a ° Ir � 1 err _.1� ��ti + •wri.. ;• %�� 4e f� J r. ° I .iT.' e' �}� Pr,' • P.�t ;I'�.. •. r V �� /! /J 3 F' i, • /j �•Q' •� .., � 111 • Iv' :� i a ::f x • f y.P• �,L r. • . /r = �.f + • .• , Iy. ' S , i'i % r' t �r (, I r?.' •.�� ►'�; 1�y'n'.�•1 ^ `vw /Af� ;�ti(;�s''.'. 1 �. \��i. •e „�'•"�•s �,�'y3 .� %', i1':I , /.;��.�i �s � t . �1.r• \, �';� ! ( ' . 1/ 3 \ S'.�:'i /. I�i 1.1d i,.,!� Ile •.,� tY r yf., ; , 'a.1.'• =: 1�,,�>ln��'. !�•: .� . .i1 .! t � yr ;l r' Aw ••.H /' 1 /`�M'1'.%• / � .h •. ,• +. +�• y �t r =% :�: "i'= 1 � /i R 7� .i, •, ,( 71. Y ..• "i1 ��'�Y �' - .,1 /i,.•''••�; r ^ /,.:�. +. ..y.•, Y'�I� i tt .fi /: wt� i 1. .;•r'! / /lr ti;� u✓i•,•�: iT,1„``�T �,,,f. ?T'•�A71+ewfi•1 .•% J•r• (•�,..... e! Y • r • `• ^►,.:.±i li •, l.t E./i: . +S ..,, r ' / �.•'�. :' !. r ' ..�e:tr ff 1i '1� 4• ".' • .it'i �...,•, ••�'; r •. `A'� T�v( .w.• 1 ` A /•' 'ti �T R Ifl�`. � r / /i'. ..': .•. /' ( 1, � .i. j/` , *i +.. I 1'+ ` J vi .� » h / / j � 1 • . e . {=:.1 f ' �'T 1 \Q!�•:y; r't .,, \\a .,. .i.�I, /•a� i P�'� " • � /.4/ �f�y � �aj "i =: r••� r� ,(fi /.ill.., .a.. +,aa�,�.�. ` { y y l �fl'r•T . • �• ..�r�I� ft. y .Y: �w! :1 t l ✓ /�• i� P ••w. i i�'ry �j ! a�r� t »' +. ).5A): fi:`.. • t a'�.. fl •�'.:�! Ci i4• •�(: .'.l';'.•„ n••i:. r �,r : "A�'. .�1 ►1 �• � .:_, = i di '� It =•i.•.*° ir/ / g!!•. ... a, fir` jd r .r i � ��;.� • i1 = •! .�a;`.• /:T'TI:' r:. :w!1 �r * ►!/ �; alitt • \•' • :'a: •n ,rr' / ,. 1 4a },�, ,� , f • Z t , / . f , •' r a� a ♦• �•'' r + � I�f S / !,. ♦ R for. �f�l t I.. L, C: J •� 1a ' /I �!+'+ `ti' +�..ta.� ,' �,,, .w�(f� •.' �� +�� r � . • ,Irl�,� \ �� / �A�� / • ��• �1 :�• F `'J•' J � i• A ' � / �i i [ • \•� ! 1 , �� . %�' f '~ � '.n'• • / ,� ',j 1 I �° r�',r I •( �li � i••.' �• /�jfdf �,�� •". rt ..r^• / � ..• It / ••�• •r • � ",f V� 7 ;(' . / 7 1 • °r•lr r a. T � `li 1, �6. %�. 1 v ::. f ••.,. r 1 {� ` \ � /� /! 1 �i ! _� r j :' Y •'�f .'=.IIr /)j j y.�.� .I =1 1�� 73i�.. ma _,� � � t v R r • / a /(: �� . = 'j I i��, ' l ��I � � � 1r,!' � 'r �, r ^w �.. �, i , � ++ .I " '{'�•. •51 S► r' • 171x i� �y * ! ) �}l { K / P a ^Jt stltw ! v /1' +, r . rfftj t. 1., rf , }f N• , +�4 ••:?♦ p ° y I 'r�•k ��A' � i /. =. .e�l vfi' /Ifj=. +.ii:��'�il.��P'h:1A;t.. r, I `. +, +� t r.0 i�.4RY�'.' 17.'i ' �'i�•.r f1�S',�. ..'r 11 /1tI i ..f •., ,%'a'trLii"!A%� e + r r a G r� t. ry ;• k 'V�1 7y1 i �'•�! SERVICE AREA KENNELS • '•. N hi � 's TAF PARKING OFFICE LOBBY ,,ENTRANCE ENTRANCE WALK H.C. PUBLIC PARKING ..Sh ,� Q�$ ° p. GATE y 2 +� `It. � X' '� i .1 '�i�Xl��'1Np T�L�'l�- "i� ( '` r�1T8I r.•i . �'�6,, SITE PLAN 89th AVENUE NORTH 10 20 90 40 NORTH 29AUG P. U. P. S. ANIMAL CONTAINMENT FACILITY co•parknnrslnlp AHCHIMT6 1'.. 1 00.0" A.,... lwl. 1, � A % ' • � , L• �r t .a•.. •i #:" "� < ' ' ;'I � : 1 t k V , t't� �•'T., j '�:.,F3'f , �1z'�' j`ta�: ".i.'Ti r. .tt t�nr�� 1 ��' `�? .� �' • '''� � ''� t(},J' s r s1 �..Il'•'F� h: 'A+ C. x. � �y'�2_'�r 'f: �11,r,M.) r •tf, � A,� ' � .li ��•, N.» ti '•� � a .,'.• o , tl:`I.l, l t � :'x�'�•� n ( +�'n y •t�� ;:� , r � � ,34�� I'r:',t'�`1. ;. r • y �1 ? } ,v2 '� � 7 t f �{, #. y ,,� 1 � � } 1 4•;1alytG�.9v'7Ry +� 3T f 51F. ti ' `,• a�i! �, +t,s. ,r y►.t�i1F.,�;fy''1:� ;4 + Lulit*� ' * 'Cj { �t� "K`Tt ~1 � fl 1'y t� 1 :.* , + M' y r t: ,`� j { i 1, ' {�;'`',1:� �t +t �5' 4 " `�' " ' { � ' j� ,� l F r ► ,rY+4;�1. 4 . I .r �l al f�:.,R� �C ' f ir , .t: f1: � �i �,, �I,t`�t� � 4� ,' �4:ti•f� t .,i. f� �j4a.,3tj �� r�,#. � r: •. 1;-.r q.,�'. h y ' �f�,'s�.•nrr � * ,j, r<!� " ,' �. §• ,e,,,.. r. ^ .t i ',y+jFr F{l..f,Lr`, '4 t^ f'1 �� :: ,.�(i'w.rj., 'fit l .:tw• Y1''•:' .vt .� .Kti,• 1 �. t'R I •? t., ! Q �'ir r Fit 1(y' jr. r � ti I s ,r.T s •��; Y >� � wr i ? t�M.•t .`� 'Y' t �> >, .. t"�l'Y '4tt y l� � } ) 3 , 7 ">� .'t: w 4.� •t 1 L ` +.{ , t '! 1 r ��.�"tC :1.�•. i I � Y ,�� T h� { )�Z• �� : �,�` ; 4 + ; • . ; 1 > rt �t)_`';•J ) 8 �F' j, I• '� � n {^{ t 111 1 r A �� «�� n + � ,} �� •t�`�i�tlri }(,ir'gC,, #k1 t•y+� y{ ��t i�1j�.��'4�'•i: ' y. �4; �f •`��. stYJ � ,'T7e' .� $ � G• k t[ ,G / ��i .f 't ^r 1� yv • f ) t� r ll'':r. ..}.fir' yyA��r j ' t:� � Z a f ��'�, 1.. +. '�'-tJ ,, ?� LL _ ;?r•A r S�. `lb.t + Og L A _ELVES Ri 1 COOLER FOOD D W y ti { � yy e + ry •� JAN 1 in S, p 1. 'j Y r •I.1 .cf BAR, �� i p 20 KENNELS cc CRAM ER y Y � `n ` f ,. • "��R}' yy � , t . +.•• {, � E' TH to MECHANICAL ROOM ABOVE V• 1''b.;f•�4t GARAGE N 3 - 45 ;. UP TO ,�, f tdf Im 0'> 1 { LL+ 1•`t{ MECH. M irk'' •'' {>;� wb v: t ME H. STAFF r �? r2 ENTRA ICEr '•` v 20 KENNELS - ;� � �i>`�y v t " j � ,1nt ti { INK -- -, -_• Vy .y, sr'j !r, c R'9 .x''. SMALL y �j+�• �` y 3'.fi�'k,ll:'� 5�1;'• ` , �� •1 { �` � r :..a , :.r ANIMALS Yt )��). � 1 fi ,}�i't �., q i��ak� ^'� �' �� t{C ti�0� � I' T "�:` K�� -�� •.. i !�' Ir l• A . .J},' I'y{ r5 .. � ,k a ' 1. ' �+'• S, � ,. O � 1 1� t F J(, !• _ y ' p., yKS c SSSSSGGGGG� Yt�l'ly 1 X l} j +C% { {= L�l l rtit• / It w. �nx ti SEATING ��• j� p - 4�`1)` t F'� ,„, r. r LOBB r OFFICE l tpp�� ,,� �'r"t1 WI c 7 �.,r ,Yt yyCC h' ' Al � l �t Fe "Hl'. ,,0t »Y,.. b1. {'i ..s.d, ,, � �, K.• COUNTER -- D. F. � fh�'�. to .� , ��sA "�. t r )� ,;� r_I 'h•j A ��' l.:: a ,}�•' .. +, '^• �' . � r' • t Y �1� � Y� H-` �Ll._ .j.,t 1 'l '1{',P rt,,, • r ��F � � .�!'�� ir�`,} F•+ � j `�� ,; ` + F ` EMPLOYEE— V ,i T { LU in / l `.1� t µ r c } '� - �• , 1 { 1 , r l f1.:u.ty— ; x 7 x -'..t} �f �xr' � �'J�y'l . ' t A P �� ,• '.,r , 4 1 h.�} , r y 11 + { ,1 ; • :, , ' YET, ENTER ;1,,j. 4r i t, a st }� wJ' ,}� t ' f t r t•fJ�i�l .) y }�i'• k ; �. — - • • ]�"•4•b' �5,, ,. I . 1 S, q y .s } { "{ • 11. ' a a•w ' + � + ,� "!, { � .ls. a1 �1 , e L � � � �( J,y,kr �. s � �c'�� '27F +,� x+ 1 > tom �. � ;•. {, t>. .yam ,�j -(�•�1 .,jy. C,(•L�; r N 1 ;�. - s � ��4T¢• t 57 .1 �•�.,, �� . • Fr T^! �Y-n r•J. k sf•• > � � � �r � t if .'WSc �•�� S� ' It 1 �� t'�'� i/ � ,P#`' ?, �N��l>! 1 , r, -' ..�, st..' � fi r. r� . `,•c1 i `F �'� E'`A`r:,� ��• t Ti l " r< a FLOOR PLAN � SIDEWALK L NORTH 2& AU090 ( P.U. P.S. ANIMAL CONTAINMENT FACILITY ( '�- o•pa,rl�n�rInoN AtICHIt[CtS � } sNn� � f r +`� / LM m tY « i �• r j . ' MIST N A tl r rjj�� '. w,>n9Y Ii �IJY,9�T�11>f��R"u e •y Y '1( �1 S �� ' i �� , y ! �� 2s eft . 2 as •}�i:i�� •e it::G e Fi Joe G �I .F s• a,. s :: � �a : �_ _ � 4�k��YM4 �,uw g f « 3 ;ti „,�1•,.. y .... ..% • • : .. r :• � F G:a s:.F..FF E : ° Et i j e• �i F . ::.. �- a #bM£bti #4 #BR'j �:nHil” Hill me eRa .:e::: : :3.F. -sae• G:FeC• F. •: s eF �• upaa:Wffiw r-- _._. R ziul :G x b b a Walla %.a�x ;.. �KbSkC ppppWaWa l` y f {1 y �q g 1{y / : #R #R ## ••.5... ..x M... �.,+.. W "bRMWiR•3•RHkiY "• . , rX. ••«. �� R :t %31 .. .6 %M R Na M�B 9.✓z..... •. un .. —acmvr it, • ti'ee:Q a fti i + f .«aw « xnYlkt S« Yt aA "bk #` tiii ��I a �'i h'i��tii��hq�,y /f al ii F ! I i�i , ; h•i$i �� fS i+.w. ii• iiiiii u 4 �■k< ab &ins «» ' � i �_. t #� `� ! i ;fit •k If .nli+na / J, ,M '• " ` " ":: :...,. « q :a:as; 3 .,• :�.:.: • S H, ,: q « ■ ti17i11� \ /• 1 9J 1x •1x«11II�'llgwpn1S E l •1 kMk #F. i .b ••• \ ■I Se #M#iY# ■•• .d }•rtl %!?'iFDL4 NYkJ'9` F • b4 I�«•, �� !4 ! wt•.1 q, ''.. �� /�;1 J. •� • : / p�Ga #^ #t #4xLl F. • '.�FF�� N� FF�� ! 1, M �I 4w1� Wg j}• n u. # ' uN 1 a "xM %a % 4 %R # ea •x "ai a�,. IPP.II��« 1 I yy .. v y :x U. % e s• ' I I. MI% #b ll //1 %kMk % %7 {\ A' 6 %A3 MM � •. .N. .• . 1 Itlll %7 %'&gg sx 1 •% , ell x laY x ��bl I,� ly� �� i •�� #MMM% >.. S n:. � r a My . x. . ': %kb SMMk�•6 k #iYY%M #k . a . 7'. v Jf ,.... :& e N THE COSTS Since the facility is planned to be located in Maple Grove, it is recommended that they handle the front end financing and the accounting function for PUPS. Capital costs The Committee also recommended that capital costs which includes land, building, and equipment be charged on a percentage basis. The percentage used for charging cities is determined by using figures for single family household (Hennepin County data), population (Met Council 1989 data) and three years of average impound. The committee recommended using this formula to more fairly and evenly distribute costs by those who would actually use the facility. Administrative costs Administrative costs are recommended to be split equally. - among the'. *seven - meittber.s:, These costs include utilities, refuse; telephone, and miscellaneous supplies. Administrative costs are those costs which are to operate the facility regardless if there are animals in the facility or not. Animal costs Animal costs are. recommended to be by actual impound use." Animal costs. consist of food, - water, personnel, etc. Costs under the animal category are those that are directly related to care of the animals. Revenues Any revenues collected from impound fees or licensing would be set and monitored by each city. Currently, each city sets and collects their own fees from impounding of animals. The committee recommends continuing with this current practice. Revenue is not shown in any of the cost estimate figures. PUPS COST ESTIMATE TOTAL OPERATIONS & CAPITAL ANIMAL COSTS ONLY BROOKLYN PARK CAPITAL $201,252 ADM. $3,493 $201,252 $18,203 ANIMAL $14,711 MAPLE GROVE CAPITAL $141,663 ADM. $3,493 $141,663 $14,944 ANIMAL $11,451 BROOKLYN CENTER CAPITAL $105,922 ADM. $3,493 $105,922 $10,190 ANIMAL $6,697 CRYSTAL' CAPITAL $87,120 ADM. $3,493 ANIMAL . $4,575 GOLDEN VALLEY CAPITAL $82,649 ADM. $3,493 $82,649 $5,640 ANIMAL $2,147 NEW HOPE CAPITAL $78,768 ADM. $3,493 $78,768 $5,832 ANIMAL $2,339 ROBBINSDALE CAPITAL $54,225 ADM. $3,493 $54,225 $6,317 ANIMAL $2,825 --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --------- -- - - - - -- TOTALS: $751,600 $69,195 PUPS COST ESTIMATES 17- Aug -90 PITAL COSTS: (SPLIT BY PERCENTAGE) ----------------------------------------------- - - - - -- - -- LAND $50,000 150FT BY 240FT, APPROX .82 ACRES BUILDING $515,000 BUILDING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT $39,800 ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING FEES $4,000 SOIL TESTING AND SURVEYS $19,500 BUILDING PERMIT AND SAC CHARGES $77,250 BUILDING CONTINGENCY 15% $30,000 FINANCING COSTS EQUIPMENT $16,050 EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE NEEDED TOTAL CAPITAL: $751,600 ESTIMATE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS: (SPLIT EQUALLY) ---------------------------------------------------------- UTILITIES $13,500 ELE, GAS, WTR /SWR, REFUSE, PHONE MISC. EQUIP. $750 OFFICE SUPPLIES AND SMALL TOOLS INSURANCE $5,000 GEN. LIA, PROPERTY, E &O SECURITY $600 SECURITY MONITORING CONTRACT $500 E.QUIPMENT-MAINTENANCE CONTRACT VET - $500 LICENSED VETERINARY - CONSULTANT EXTERIOR MAINT: 600 MAINTENANCE ON EXTERIOR OF BLDG. FINANCING $3.,000 MAPLE GROVE FEES - FINANCIAL PROCESSING TOTAL ADM: $24,450 ESTIMATE ANIMAL COSTS: (SPLIT BY IMPOUND USE) ------------------------------- PERSONNEL $35,620 1 FULL TIME, 1 PART TIME EMPLOYEE TRAINING $500 COUNSELING $500 EUTHANASIA RELATED FOOD ETC. $3,750 FOOD, BEDDING, AND SUPPLIES REMOVAL $4,175 $12.50 PER ANIMAL EST.(25% EST.) SUPPLIES $200 EUTHANASIA SUPPLIES TOTAL ANIMAL: $44,745 ESTIMATE PUPS CALCULATIONS 87 -89 AVG CITY HOUSEHOLD POPULATION IMPOUND TOTAL BP 14,500 55,294 384 70178 26.78 MG 11,371 37,729 299 49399 18.85 BC 8,183 28,578 175 36936 14.09 CRY 7,445 22,815 119 30379 11.59 GV 6,951 21,813 56 28820 11.00 NH 4,726 22,680 61 27467 10.48 ROB 4,559 14,276 74 18909 7.21 TOTAL 57,735 203,185 1,167 262,087 100 POPULATION FIGURES OBTAINED FROM MET COUNCIL. FIGURES ARE FOR 1989 . HOUSEHOLD FIGURES ARE 1989 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS AS RECORDED BY HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY DIVISION 0 THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT A Joint Powers Agreement was drafted by the Committee members working with Crystal City Attorney Dave Kennedy of Holmes and Graven. The joint powers for PUPS details out the purpose, membership, meetings, powers and duties etc. of PUPS. It is the consensus of the Committee that initial members are responsible for 100% of capital costs regardless of length of time of use of PUPS facility. Once the Joint Powers agreement is passed by all Cities, the Board of Directors will meet to develop the by -laws which will detail out the formal operations of the PUPS organization. THE RECOMMENDATION The Committee recommends the City-Council of each of the seven cities take the following action: 1. Approval of the PUPS Joint Powers Agreement by council resolution, which also allows for capital and 1991 operating costs for PUPS to be allocated. 2. Council appointment of each city's director and alternate director to work within the PUPS by- laws, operating guidelines and Joint Powers Agreement. 8/90 N. Gohman JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PETS UNDER POLICE SECURITY The parties to this agreement are governmental units of the State of Minnesota. This agreement is made and entered into pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 471.59. ARTICLE I. GENERAL PURPOSE The general purpose of this agreement is to create an organization by which the parties may jointly and cooperatively provide for the efficient and economical impoundment of animals coming into their possession in the course of the conduct of municipal animal control programs in a jointly owned and operated animal control impound facility. ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS Section 1. For purposes of this agreement the terms defined in this Article have the meanings given them. Section 2. "Agreement" means this agreement. Section 3. "Board" means the board of directors created by Article IV. Section 4. "Director" means a director or alternate director appointed under Article IV of this agreement. Section 5. "Governing body" means the city council or other governing body of a member. Section 6. "Governmental unit" means a home rule city, a statutory city, and any political subdivision of the state authorized to take possession of and impound animals as part of an animal control program. Section 7. "Member" means a governmental unit which is a party to this agreement and is in compliance with and in good standing under this agreement. Section 8. "Pets Under Police Security (PUPS) means the organization established by this agreement. ARTICLE III. MEMBERSHIP Section 1. Any governmental unit is eligible to be a member of PUPS. Section 2. The initial members of PUPS are the cities of Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Crystal, Golden Valley, New Hope, Maple Grove and Robbinsdale. Section 3. A governmental unit other than an initial member desiring to be a member of PUPS may do so by executing and delivering a copy of this agreement in the manner provided by Article XII and complying with its terms. The board must approve or disapprove the admission of a governmental unit. The board may impose reasonable conditions on the admission of members and establish procedures for the removal of a member for cause. A governmental unit becoming a member must pay to PUPS a sum equal to the capital contribution obligation of the initial members pursuant to Article VIII. ARTICLE IV. BOAR.D OF DI RECTORS Section 1. The governing body of PUPS is its board of directors. A member must appoint one director to the board. A director has one vote. A member may appoint one alternate director. The alternate director may attend meetings of the board and may vote in the absence of that member's director. Section 2. Directors are appointed by resolution of the governing body of a member. The appointing resolution must be filed with the secretary- treasurer. The resolution must be accompanied by the director's address for purposes of notice. Section 3. The term of a director is one year. The terms of directors initially appointed expire on December 31, 1990. Directors serve until their respective successors are appointed and qualify. Section 4. A director may be removed from the board at any time, with or without cause, by resolution of the governing body making the appointment. The resolution removing the director must be filed with the secretary - treasurer. Section 5. A vacancy on the board is filled in the same manner that an appointment of a director is made. Section 6. Directors may not vote by proxy. Section 7. A director may not vote if the board determines that the member represented by the director is not in compliance with this agreement or if the director has been removed from the board. ARTICLE V. MEETINGS Section 1. The directors of the initial members must conduct an organizational meeting no later than 30 days after the effective date of this agreement. At the organizational meeting, or as soon thereafter as is reasonably possible, the board must elect its officers and adopt such by -laws and other procedures governing the conduct of its meetings and its business as it deems appropriate. Section 2. The board must conduct an annual meeting at a date and place specified in its by -laws to elect officers and to undertake such other business as may properly come before it. The board may provide for a schedule of regular meetings. A regular meeting must be held once in each calendar quarter in the year 1990 and thereafter as provided by the by -laws. Section 3. A special meeting of the board may be called by the president or by the secretary- treasurer upon written request of such number of directors as specified by the by -laws. Notice of a special meeting must be mailed to directors at least five days prior to the special meeting and in accordance with law. Business at special meetings is limited to matters contained in the notice of the special meeting. ARTICLE VI. OFFICERS: COMMITTEES Section 1. The officers of the board are a president, a vice president and a secretary- treasurer elected for a term of one year by the directors at the organizational meeting and at the annual meeting. The board may designate directors to act as officers in the absence of an officer. Section 2. The president presides at meetings of the board. The secretary- treasurer is responsible for records of proceedings of the board, the funds and financial records of the board, and such other matters as may be delegated to the secretary- treasurer by the board. Section 3. The president and the secretary- treasurer i must sign vouchers or orders disbursing funds of PUPS. Disbursement must be made in the method prescribed by law for statutory cities. Section 4. The board may in its by -laws provide for and define the duties of such other officers as it determines necessary from time to time. Section 5. The board may in its by -laws provide for such committees as it determines necessary from time to time. A by- law providing for an executive committee and defining the powers and duties of an executive committee may be adopted only by a favorable vote of all members of the board. ARTICLE VII. POWERS AND DLTI' I ES Section 1. The board may take such actions as it deems necessary and convenient to accomplish the general purposes of this agreement. Section 2. The board may: a) enter into contracts with public or private agencies or persons to carry out its powers and duties; b) provide for the prosecution, defense, or other participation in proceedings at law or in equity in which it may have an interest; c) employ such persons as it deems necessary on a part - time, full -time or consultant basis; d) purchase, hold or dispose of real and personal property; e) contract for space, commodities or personal services with a member or group of members; f) conduct research in animal control matters; g) accept gifts, apply for and use grants or loans of money or other property from the state, the United States of America, and from other governmental units and may enter into agreements in connection therewith and hold, use and dispose of such money or property in accordance with the terms of the gift, grant, loan or agreement relating thereto; and h) apply for and pay premiums on policies of insurance and surety bonds for personnel in such amounts as deemed necessary, provided that the board must provide that the organization or each of its members has public liability insurance coverage in the maximum liability amounts specified in Minnesota Statutes, section 466.04. ARTICLE VIII. FINANCIAL MATTERS Section 1. The fiscal year of PUPS is the calendar year. Section 2. The board must adopt an annual budget prior to July 1 of each year. The board must give each member a reasonable opportunity to comment or object to the proposed budget before adoption. Notice of the adopted budget must be mailed promptly thereafter to the chief administrative officer of each member. The budget is deemed approved by each member unless a member gives written notice to the secretary - treasurer that the member is withdrawing at the end of the year as provided in Article X. Section 3. Operational and capital costs are to be shared according to methods agreed upon by unanimous vote of the board. Those methods may include membership dues and fees, charges for services to members, and charges for capital costs to members. Section 4. Billings to PUPS members are due and payable no later than 30 days after mailing. In the event of a dispute as to the amount of a billing, a member must nevertheless make payment as billed to preserve membership status. The member may make payment subject to its right to dispute the bill and exercise any remedies available to it. Failure to pay a billing within 60 days results in suspension of voting privileges of the member's director. Failure to pay a billing within 120 days is grounds for termination of membership but PUPS rights to the billing are not affected by termination of membership. Section 5. The board must provide in the by -laws for the reporting to the members of the receipts and disbursements and the financial condition of the organization at regular intervals not less than quarterly. ARTICLE IX. ADMINISTRATOR Section 1. PUPS may appoint an administrator. The administrator may be employed on a full -time, part -time or consulting basis. Section 2. The administrator, dm nistrator, if appointed, has those powers and duties specified in the by -laws and delegated by the board. The administrator reports to and is responsible to the board. ARTICLE X. WITHDRAWAL Section 1. A member may withdraw from PUPS no later than 30 days after the adoption of the Y giving budget b ivin written notice to g the secretary- treasurer. The notice must be accompanied by a certified copy of a resolution adopted by the governing body of that member authorizing its withdrawal from membership. The withdrawal is effective at the end of the calendar year in which notice is given. Section 2. The withdrawal of a member does not affect that member's obligation to pay fees, charges or contractual charges for which it is obligated under this agreement. ARTICLE XI. DISSOLUTION: AMENDMENT Section 1. PUPS may be dissolved by a two- thirds vote of the members in good standing. Dissolution is mandatory when the secretary- treasurer has received certified copies of resolutions adopted by the governing bodies of the required two - thirds of the members requesting dissolution of PUPS. Section 2. In the event of dissolution, the board must determine the measures necessary to effect the dissolution and must provide for the taking of such measures as promptly as circumstances permit, subject to the provisions of this agreement and law. Section 3. In the event of dissolution and following the payment of all outstanding obligations assets of PUPS will be distributed among the then existing members in direct proportion to their cumulative annual membership contributions. If those obligations exceed the assets of PUPS the net deficit of PUPS will be charged to and paid by the then existing members in direct proportion to their cumulative annual membership contributions. Section 4. In the event of dissolution the City of Maple Grove has the right g t of first refusal to purchase the land and buildings on which the initial PUPS impound facility is located. Section 5. This agreement may be amended by an affirmative vote of all members. ARTICLE XI I . EFFECTIVE DATE; DURATION This agreement continues in effect indefinitely unless terminated in accordance with its terms. This agreement is effective on the day that executed copies of this agreement accompanied by the member resolution authorizing its execution is filed by the initial members with the city clerk of the City of Crystal. IN WITNESS WBEREOF, the undersigned governmental unit has g caused this agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officers and delivered on its behalf as of this N - -- day of , 1990. CITY OF By --- I ts ------------- - - - - -- And _ __ Its -------------- -- - - -- Received and filed by the City of Crystal this _ -- day of -------- - - - - -- - - -' 1990. CR.205 -47 Fo Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE OF RICHARD E. NORDSTROM WHEREAS, Richard E. Nordstrom served the City of Brooklyn Center from December 16, 1968 to August 31 1990• and g � , WHEREAS, his consistent and exemplary job performance during that period merits the gratitude of the citizens of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that his service to the community should be recognized and expressed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the dedicated public service of Richard E. Nordstrom is hereby recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number CI? f= REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR REMOVAL OF HOUSES ON 69TH AVENUE, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -21 ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: l SY KNAPP, bXECTOR CfF PUBLIC WORKS ****************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** d_. MANAGERS REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: 1 �_,� No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) In conjunction with the reconstruction of 69th Avenue North between Brooklyn Boulevard and Shingle Creek Parkway, separate contracts for house removals will be let in the near future. Because of the timing of the closings on the individual properties, it is likely that perhaps as many as three or four separate contracts for house removals will be needed. Staff has developed a "typical" specification for use in each of these anticipated contracts. Using specifications from other governmental units as examples, we have assembled a specification and proposal form which is highlighted by the following: • The specification and proposal form is flexible enough to allow the City to select the highest offer for individual houses, not necessarily the highest offer for all houses, as a package. If the City so desired, it could mix and match contractors and houses, so as to obtain the highest offer for each house. • The specifications provide for bid security and performance surety, similar to City specifications for construction projects. • The City will then deliver a Bill of Sale, if appropriate, to the highest bidder upon receipt of payment in full and delivery of all securities and sureties. In the event that the "highest bid" submitted for an individual house actually represents a net cost to the City, the Contract will be administered as a normal construction project. • The specifications dictate that all utility disconnections, well abandonments, etc. will be performed in strict compliance with all federal, state and local regulations and /or ordinances. I • The City assumes no responsibility or makes any representations as to the conditions of the houses during the removals and all damages or loses are at the risk of the bidder. • The contractor will be responsible for maintenance of the entire property, including litter and debris removal, grass cutting, weed removal and trimming of storm damaged trees, during the contract. The contractor will also be required to provide public liability insurance covering the entire property during the life of the contract. The City will resume responsibility for maintenance of the site upon satisfactory completion. • The specifications and plans will identify, in advance, all trees or shrubs that could possibly be removed during the house removal. Unauthorized removals will cause the City to seek damages from the bidder and /or his agents. It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution which approves these specifications for use in the 69th Avenue No. project. Council Action Required Adopt the attached resolution. • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR REMOVAL OF HOUSES ON 69TH AVENUE, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -21 WHEREAS, the 69th Avenue North reconstruction project requires the removal of existing houses and garages along the north side of the road; and WHEREAS, the removal of such structures will be performed outside of the future contract for road reconstruction; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has developed a specification for removal of houses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the specifications for house removals, as prepared by the City Engineer, are hereby approved for use in conjunction with the 69th Avenue North reconstruction project, Improvement Project No. 1990 -21. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish advertisement for bids for the removal of houses in accordance with said specifications. The advertisement for bids shall be published as required by law. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/9 Agenda Item Number - -Xk=—' REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1990 -A, 1990 SEALCOATING PROGRAM ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: J -4 49t , � ' SY KNAPP, DIRE OR OF PtIBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) • Contract 1990 -A, 1990 sealcoating program (Improvement Project No. 1990 -08) has been completed by Allied Blacktop Company. The City Council awarded the bid as per Resolution No. 90 -119 and a contract was subsequently executed in the amount of $109,781.19. Responding to a petition by property owners, City Council directed staff to negotiate and execute a change order for the re- sealing of approximately 10 blocks of streets which were in a prior year's program. The value of this change order was $9,052.50. As a result of a minor overrun of quantities, the final contract amount exceeds the original contract, plus approved change order by $1,095.14. It is requested that the Council approve final payment in the amount of $119,928.83. The 1990 Division No. 42 Street Maintenance budget included $155,000 for the sealcoating program, so no additional funds need be appropriated for the overrun. City Council Action Required Adopt the attached resolution. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1990 -A, 1990 SEALCOATING PROGRAM WHEREAS, pursuant to written contract signed with the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Allied Blacktop Company has satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance with said contract: 1990 SEALCOATING PROGRAM NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The work completed under said contract is accepted and approved according to the following schedule: Original Contract With Approved Change Order Final Amount Value of Work $118,833.69 $119,928.83 2. The value of work actually performed exceeds the original contract value plus approved change order by $1,095.14, due to a minor underestimation of quanitites. 3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvement under said contract shall be $119,928.83. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR XERXES AVENUE SIDEWALK, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -19, CONTRACT 1990 -I DEPT. APPROVAL: i 440 SY KNAPP, DI TOR O UBLIC WORKS 47 MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: ter. No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) ® At its regular meeting of August 27, 1990, the City Council adopted a resolution which established the Xerxes Avenue Sidewalk Project (1990 -19), approved plans and specifications and ordered advertisement for bids. Bids for this work were received and opened on September 6, 1990. Of the 2 bids received (see attached resolution), the lowest bid was that of Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc., in the amount of $23,508.00. The Engineer's estimate for this construction, including a 15% contingency, was $30,746.00. Staff recommends acceptance of the low bid and award of the contract to Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. City Council Action Required A resolution is provided for consideration by the Council. • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR XERXES AVENUE SIDEWALK, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -19, CONTRACT 1990 -I WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project No. 1990 -19, Xerxes Avenue sidewalk, bids were received, opened, and tabulated by the City Clerk and City Engineer, on the 6th day of September, 1990. Bidder Bid Amount Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. $23,508.00 Schmidt Curb Co., Inc. $26,759.10 WHEREAS, it appears that Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc., is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. of Rogers, Minnesota in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project No. 1990 -19 according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. 3. The estimated cost for Improvement Project No. 1990 -19 is hereby amended from $34,436.00 to $27,642.00. The estimated project cost is comprised of the following: As Amended As Established (per low bid) Total Estimated Construction Cost (incl. Contingency) $30,746.00 $24,680.00 Engineering (10 %) 3,074.60 $ 2,468.00 Administration (1 %) 307.70 $ 247.00 Legal (1 %) 307.70 $ 247.00 Total Estimated Project Cost $34,436.00 $27,642.00 i RESOLUTION NO. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number h REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF DISEASED SHADE TREES ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, DIRPCT,OR OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) ® The attached resolution represents the official Council action required P q fired to expedite removal of the trees most recently marked by the City tree inspector, in accordance with approved procedures. It is anticipated that this resolution will be submitted for Council consideration each meeting during the summer and fall as new trees are marked. Recommendation It is recommended the Council adopt the attached resolution. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF DISEASED SHADE TREES (ORDER NO. DST 09/10/90) WHEREAS, a Notice to Abate Nuisance and Shade Tree Removal Agreement has been issued to the owners of certain properties in the City of Brooklyn Center giving the owners twenty (20) days to remove shade trees on the owners' property; and WHEREAS, the City can expedite the removal of these shade trees by declaring them a public nuisance: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The shade trees at the following addresses are hereby declared to be a public nuisance. PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS TREE NUMBER TRI STATE LAND CO. 4837 FRANCE AVE N 370 TRI STATE LAND CO. 4837 FRANCE AVE. N. 371 TRI STATE LAND CO. 4837 FRANCE AVE. N. 372 STEPHEN NELSON 821 69TH AVE N 568 PHYLLIS OWENS 6520 BROOKLYN BLVD. 569 MICHAEL /BRENDA HELD 5332 IRVING AVE N 570 MARGARET MITERKO 5749 BRYANT AVE N 571 2. After twenty (20) days from the date of the notice, the property owners will receive a second written notice that will give them (5) business days in which to contest the determination of City Council by requesting a hearing in writing. Said request shall be filed with the City Clerk. 3. After five (5) days, if the property owner fails to request a hearing, the tree(s) shall be removed by the City. 4. All removal costs, including legal, financing and administrative charges, shall be specially assessed against the property. RESOLUTION NO. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/lo/go Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A THIRD R PA TY AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION OF THE YEAR XV SINGLE - FAMILY HOUSING REHAB PROGRAM DEPT. APPROVAL: EDA Coordinator ignature -title MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: r� '+ No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: su lemental sheets attached � PP � The resolution before you authorizes the execution of an agreement with Metro HRA to provide administrative services for our rehab grant program. The agreement stipulates that Metro HRA will • comply with the rules and regulations of the CDBG program as established by HUD and make their records available to HUD, Hennepin County, and ourselves for audit and /or inspection. This is a renewal of our three -year agreement and is required by HUD. RECOMMENDED ACTION BY CITY COUNCIL: I recommend approval roval of this I will be available Monday evening should you have any questions. ` � A UUU �[ I Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A THIRD PARTY AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION OF THE YEAR XV SINGLE - FAMILY HOUSING REHAB PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City is a cooperating unit in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) by virtue of a joint cooperation agreement executed between the City and Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, the City has executed a subrecipient agreement with Hennepin County which allocates funds from the Year XV (FY 1989) Urban Hennepin County CDBG program for the purpose of supporting the activities as identified in Exhibit 1, which is attached to and a part of the Third Party Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City must execute the Third Party Agreement for operation of the Year XV Single - Family Housing Rehab Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute a Third Party Agreement between the City of Brooklyn Center and Metropolitan Council Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date Agenda Item Number f . REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION DECLARING SURPLUS PROPERTY AND DESIGNATING USE DEPT. APPROVAL: i Signature - le— 4ames Lindsay, Chief of Police MANAGER'S /RECOMMENDATION: ✓° ` �'' l No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached yes ) In May, 1987, the department came into the possession of a 1981 Chevrolet pickup truck during a drug arrest. Because the case was interstate, it was decided to prosecute federally through the alcohol, tobacco and firearms (ATF) agency. Shortly after, the ATF agent assigned was transferred to Miami. In attempting to track the case since that time, all ATF would tell us was that it was pending. We eventually learned in November of 1989 that the case had never been presented for charging but had been lost in the back of a credenza at ATF. The department has since taken charge of the case. Through the County Attorney's office, charges were filed in January of 1990. Certified letters were mailed to both the defendant, C.J. Coyle, and his attorney. The storage fee at this time is in excess of $6,500. The defendant received his notice on November 17, 1989. The defendant at no time during the three year period since 1987; nor since receiving the notice on November 17, 1989, has made any claim to the vehicle. The city garage has inspected the vehicle and indicated with some minor repairs it would be serviceable for use by the city. The city manager has determined the vehicle be used by the park and recreation department. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council pass the resolution declaring the vehicle abandoned property and appropriating it for city use. FJ Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY FROM POLICE PROPERTY STORAGE TO THE PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, on May 13, 1987, a 1981 Chevrolet pickup was seized in a drug related arrest; and WHEREAS, the owner was notified by certified mail that he had 30 days in which to claim the vehicle; and WHEREAS, the owner did sign for and receive the notice but did not take any further action to claim the vehicle; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 2 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center, the City Council can authorize the appropriation of said vehicle for City use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the 1981 Chevrolet pickup (VIN GTCC14D8BF70561) is hereby declared abandoned and unclaimed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby directed to transfer this vehicle to the Park and Recreation Department. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/ Agenda Item Number iT K REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION DECLARING SURPLUS PROPERTY *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: 0� W_ ' - 0 ( pn &I Administrative Aide Signature - title MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: b No comments to supplement this report Comments below/attached- SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached The Park and Recreation Department has a Silver -Reed EX77 typewriter which is not repairable. The City Manager has approved the purchase of a new typewriter using funds which are in the 1990 budget for equipment replacement. Since the typewriter is not repairable, 1 recommend using it as a trade -in when we purchase the new typewriter. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING SURPLUS PROPERTY FA #2885 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that a Silver -Reed EX77 typewriter (Fixed Asset #2885) is hereby declared surplus. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to use the typewriter as a trade -in when purchasing a new typewriter. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ' and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Numbe REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Minnesota State Building Code DEPARTMENT AP L: Signature - title Director of Planning and Inspection MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: ; .z�° No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached On August 13, 1990 the City Council had a first reading on the - • above entitled ordinance amendment which is a revision to Section 3 -101 of the City Ordinances to adopt various revisions to the Building Code to be in compliance with the recently adopted Minnesota State Building Code. The revised Building Code was adopted by the State of Minnesota on July 9, 1990. The adoption of the Minnesota State Building Code will not require the City to expend additional dollars to administer, implement, P , or operate other than that which might be associa ted with the P g inspectors becoming g more familiar with the new code P rovisions. Recommendation It is recommended that City Council, following public hearing on this matter, adopt the new revisions making up the State Building Code. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby iven that a public hearing will be held on the g P g 10th day of September , 19 at 7:30 p. m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway to consider an amendment to Chapter 3 regarding the Minnesota State Building Code. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 561 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 3 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended by the repeal in the following manner: Section 3 -101. [ADOPTION OF THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE. The City of Brooklyn Center hereby adopts by reference those State Regulations 2MCAR 1.10101 through 2MCAR 1.18901 collectively known as the Minnesota State Building Code, filed with the Secretary of State and the Commissioner of Administration on September 9, 1980. [The following codes are adopted by reference as part of the 1980 Minnesota State Building Code: A. 1979 Edition of the Uniform Building Code, identified as the "UBC". B. 1978 National Electric Code, identified as "NEC ". C. 1978 American National Standard Safety Code for elevators, dumbwaiters, escalators, and moving walks, identified as "ANSI A17.1 1978, and supplements ANSI A17.12 1979 ". D. 1979 Minnesota Plumbing Code, identified as "MHD 120 through MHD 135 ". E. Flood Proofing Regulations (FPR), Office of the Chief Engineers, U. S. Army. F. 1975 Edition of the One and Two Family Dwelling Code. ORDINANCE NO. G. 1976 Edition of the Heating, Ventilating, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Code, identified as SBC 7101 through SEC 8505. H. The following mandatory appendices, annexes, and supplemental material listed in this code. 1. Minnesota State Building Code, Appendix "A ", identified as "Technical Requirements for Fallout Shelters ", (applying only to State - owned buildings). 2. Minnesota State Building Code, Appendix "B ", identified as "Variation in Snow Loads ". 3. 1979 UBC Appendix, Chapter 35, identified as "Sound Transmission Control ". 4. Minnesota Plumbing Code, Appendix "B ", identified as "Plumbing Illustrations ". [Three copies of the 1980 Minnesota State Building Code shall be on file and available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. Those regulations combined with the provisions of this Chapter of the City Ordinances shall hereinafter be known as the "Building Code ".] Section 2. Chapter 3 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended by the addition of the following: Section 3 -101. Building Code. The Minnesota State Building Code, established pursuant to MN Stat 16B.59 to 16B.73, one copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk is hereby adopted as the building code for the City of Brooklyn Center. Such code is hereby incorporated in this ordinance as completely as if set out in full A. The following chapters are adopted by reference as Part of the 1990 Minnesota State Building Code. 1. Chapter 1300 - Code Administration 2. Chapter 1301 - Certification and Continuing Education of Building Officials 3. Chapter 1302 - Building Construction and State Agency Construction Rules ORDINANCE NO. 4. Chapter 1305 - Adoption of the 1988 Uniform Building Code by Reference The 1987 ANSI A 17.1 Code for Elevators and Related Devices is an amendment to Chapter 51 of the UBC and no longer found in SBC Rule 1320. a. Required Provisions - UBC Appendix Chapter 35 Sound Transmission Control 5. Chapter 1315 - Electrical Code 6. Chapter 1325 - Solar Energy Systems 7. Chapter 1330 - Technical Requirements for Fallout Shelters 8. Chapter 1335 - Floodproofing Regulations (when required) 9. Chapter 1340 - Facilities for the Handicapped 10. Chapter 1346 - Minnesota Uniform Mechanical Code 1990 Edition 11. Chapter 1350 - Manufactured Home Rules 12. Chapter 1355 - Plumbing Code - Administrative Rule 4715 13. Chapter 1360 - Prefabricated Structures 14. Chapter 1365 - Variation of Snow Loads 15. Chapter 1370 - Model Energy Code- - Administrative Rule 7670 16. Chapter 1305.0150 Subpart 2 a. UBC Appendix Chapters 1, 12, Division 1, 26, 38, 55, and 70 17. Chapter 1305.6905 special fire suppression systems with option 3808 (c) 8. 18. Chapter 1310 - Building Security ORDINANCE NO. 19. Chapter 1335 - Floodproofing Regulations Parts 1335.0200 to 1335.3100 and FPR Sections 200.2 to 1405.3 Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of , 19 Mayor ATTEST: Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter). MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AUGUST 30, 1990 STUDY SESSION CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission met in study session and was called to order by Chairperson Molly Malecki at 7:33 p.m. ROLL CALL Chairperson Molly Malecki, Commissioners Wallace Bernards, Bertil Johnson and Mark Holmes. Also present were Director of Planning and Inspection Ronald Warren and Planner Gary Shallcross. It was noted that Commissioners Ella Sander, Lowell Ainas and Kristen Mann were excused. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 16 1990 Motion by Commissioner Bernards seconded by Commissioner Holmes to approve the minutes of the August 16, 1990 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. Voting in favor: Chairperson Malecki, Commissioners Bernards and Holmes. Voting against: none. Not voting: Commissioner Johnson. The motion passed. APPLICATION NO. 90024 (Brookdale Office Park) Following the Chairperson's explanation, the Secretary introduced the first item of business, a request for preliminary plat approval and site plan amendment to alter the common property line between the Brooklyn Crossing Office building at 3300 County Road 10 and the multiple building parcel to the east. The Secretary reviewed the contents of the staff report (see Planning Commission Information Sheet for Application No. 90024 attached). The Secretary also showed the Planning Commission the location of Building A and the new location of the common property line on a transparency. The Secretary explained the background of the new medical tenants going into the complex, the restrictive covenant which had been placed on the property by the property owner and the reasons staff had issued permits in the interim. Commissioner Bernards asked whether the three unbuilt buildings would be affected by the replat. The Secretary answered that the foundation for Building A would have to be reduced, but that otherwise the buildings could be built essentially as proposed. Commissioner Holmes asked whether parking for the complex would suffice. The Secretary responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Holmes asked whether there were any plans to develop the unbuilt office buildings. Mr. Dave Carland, representing the applicant, stated that that would be a function of demand which is soft at this time. Chairperson Malecki asked the applicant whether he had 8/30/90 1 anything else to add to the application. Mr. Carland responded in the negative. PUBLIC HEARING (Application No 90024) Chairperson Malecki then opened the meeting for a public hearing on Application No. 90024 and asked whether anyone present wished to speak regarding the application. She noted that there was no one present to speak and called for a motion to close the public hearing. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Motion by Commissioner Johnson seconded by Commissioner Holmes to close the public hearing. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Holmes stated that there seemed to be ample parking on the.site at present. The Secretary noted that there are cross access and cross parking agreements between the main building site and the multiple building site which are presently under one ownership. He acknowledged that there was more parking now than is needed, but that future development would probably use all available parking on the site. In response to a question from Commissioner Johnson regarding access to the development, the Secretary explained that the access to Lot 1 (the main building site) would be across Lot 2 (the multiple building site) and noted there is a cross access agreement filed which preserves this arrangement. He explained some of the background of the Brooklyn Crossing office development as it was originally proposed and then replanned in 1986. He explained that access to the westerly building has always been across the easterly site. Commissioner Johnson expressed some concern about left turn movements from eastbound County Road 10 onto Northway Drive. He asked whether there would be a need for signals at some in the future. The Secretary expressed doubt that signals would ever be needed. He then explained some of the background of the County's plans for County Road 10 which had been developed about five years ago and also noted that access was considered at some length when the development was first proposed. Commissioner Johnson stated that his concern is that as traffic builds, it will be difficult to cross County Road 10. The Secretary acknowledged that this might happen and that cars might go on to Xerxes Avenue North and turn north and up to Northway Drive. There followed a brief discussion of traffic movements in the area. ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO 90024 (Brookdale Office Park) Motion by Commissioner Bernards seconded by Commissioner Johnson to recommend approval of Application No. 90024, subject to the following conditions: 8/30/90 2 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 the City ordinances. 3. Medical occupancy shall be limited to no more than 3,955 sq. ft. on Lot 1 and no more than 6,600 sq. ft. on Lot 2. 4. The restrictive covenant placed on the properties restricting future development and medical occupancy shall not be released until the plat is filed at the County and the foundation for Building A is reduced in size to 6,000 sq. ft. consistent with the amended site plan. Voting in favor: Chairperson Malecki, Commissioners Bernards, Johnson and Holmes. Voting against: none. The motion passed. There followed a brief discussion of the Commission's upcoming schedule for the rest of 1990. The Secretary also discussed with the Commission the possibility of a rezoning on the Soo Line property just north of the Murphy Warehouse on France Avenue North. He noted that the City was looking at the possibility of park development in the area including the Joslyn property. Commissioner Johnson asked whether the cleanup of the Joslyn property was completed. The Secretary responded that he did not think so. He stated that there was some land farming and pumping of ground water still going on at present. He stated that he was not aware of any contamination of wells in the area. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Holmes seconded by Commissioner Bernards to adjourn the meeting of the Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously. The Planning Commission adjourned at 8:07 p.m. Chairperson 8/30/90 3 Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 90024 Applicant: Brooklyn Office Park Partnership Location: 3300 County Road 10 Request: Preliminary Plat The applicant requests preliminary plat approval to redivide the two lots containing the Brooklyn Crossing office building and the five smaller office buildings (two of which are fully built) to the east, at the northeast corner of Brooklyn Boulevard and County Road 10. The property in question is zoned ClA and is bounded on the north by single - family homes, on the east by the Honeywell Credit Union (old F & M bank) and Northway Drive, on the south by County Road 10, and on the west by Brooklyn Boulevard. The purpose of the new subdivision is to transfer some parking stalls from the multi - building site (new Lot 2) to the main building site (new Lot 1) in order to allow some medical tenants in the main building. The applicant has also submitted a revised site plan for the multi - building parcel which reduces the size of one of the future office buildings (Bldg. A) from 8,400 sq. ft. to 6,000 sq. ft. and adds 9 new parking stalls. The purpose of this revision is also to allow for some medical tenancies on the multi - building site. Medical uses require more parking per given area than general office uses. The total area of the two lot plat to be known as Brooklyn Crossing 3rd Addition, is 325,343 sq. ft. or 7.469 acres. The area of Lot 1 (the main building site) is 143,593 sq. ft. or 3.296 acres. The area of Lot 2 (the multi - building site) is 181,750 sq. ft. or 4.173 acres. The revised site plan shows 264 parking stalls on the main building site (including 2 within a parking lot island). The size of the main building is 55,193 sq. ft. (Gross Floor Area) . This number of parking spaces will allow for up to approximately 3,955 sq. ft. of medical space (@ one space for 150 sq. ft. = 26.37 spaces) and 51,237 sq. ft. of general office (@ one space per 215.6 sq. ft. _ 237.63 spaces) (there is a sliding scale formula for general office parking). The multi- building parcel is to have 33,600 sq. ft. of office space and 179 parking stalls. On this site, the parking requirement for general office space is simply one space per 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The maximum medical occupancy on the multi - building parcel is 6,600 sq. ft. (6,600 = 150 = 44 spaces). The corresponding general office usage would be 27,000 sq. ft. (27,000 = 200 = 135 spaces). Staff have issued two permits for medical tenants in this complex, one of 1,266 sq. ft. on the multi- building site and one for 3,514 sq. ft. on the main building site. This lives within the limits for each building outlined above. The property has filed a covenant against both parcels limiting medical use to 4,800 sq. ft. is on the entire complex, prohibiting development of the three 8 -30 -90 1 Application No. 90024 continued remaining office buildings, and stipulating that the covenant will only be released by City approval when all parking requirements have been met for each site so that the previously mentioned permits could be issued. This preliminary plat is in furtherance of that objective. When the plat is filed and the foundation for Building A on the multi- building site has been cut back to 6,000 sq. ft., the covenant will be released. We have encouraged the property owner to provide more parking than the general office formula requires in order to accommodate some medical tenants. This is an on -going issue with most multi- tenant office buildings in the City. In this case, there is still some flexibility since not all the buildings have been built and the entire complex is still owned in common. What we wish to avoid is parking deficiencies in the future when one or the other site may be sold to another party. In general, the preliminary plat and revised site plan appear to be in order and approval is recommended, subject to at least the following conditions: 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City ordinances. 3. Medical occupancy shall be limited to no more than 3,955 sq. ft. on Lot 1 and no more than 6,600 sq. ft. on Lot 2. 4. The restrictive covenant placed on the properties restricting future development and medical occupancy shall not be released until the plat is filed at the County and the foundation for Building A is reduced in size to 6,000 sq. ft. consistent with the amended site plan. 8 -30 -90 2 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Planning Commission Application No. 90024 - Brookdale Office Park DEPARTMENT APP //�� ..�� 0# Signature - title Director of Planning and I specti on MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached X ) Application No 90024 is a request for preliminary plat approval to redivide the two lots containing the Brooklyn Crossing office building and the five smaller office buildings (two of which are fully built) to the east, at the northeast corner of Brooklyn Boulevard and County Road 10. The application was considered by the Planning Commission at its August 30, 1990 regular meeting. Minutes, information sheet, map and drawings from that meeting are attached for the Council's review. Recommendation Approval of the application was recommended by the Planning Commission subject to the conditions listed on page 3 of the August 16, 1990 minutes. • MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AUGUST 30, 1990 STUDY SESSION CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission met in study session and was called to order by Chairperson Molly Malecki at 7:33 p.m. ROLL CALL Chairperson Molly Malecki, Commissioners Wallace Bernards, Bertil Johnson and Mark Holmes. Also present were Director of Planning and Inspection Ronald Warren and Planner Gary Shallcross. It was noted that Commissioners Ella Sander, Lowell Ainas and Kristen Mann were excused. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 16 1990 Motion by Commissioner Bernards seconded by Commissioner Holmes to approve the minutes of the August 16, 1990 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. Voting in favor: Chairperson Malecki, Commissioners Bernards and Holmes. Voting against: none. Not voting: Commissioner Johnson. The motion passed. APPLICATION NO. 90024 (Brookdale Office Park) Following the Chairperson's explanation, the Secretary introduced the first item of business, a request for preliminary plat approval and site plan amendment to alter the common property line between the Brooklyn Crossing Office building at 3300 County Road 10 and the multiple building parcel to the east. The Secretary reviewed the contents of the staff t ff re ort see p ( Planning Commission Information Sheet for Application No. 90024 attached). The Secretary also showed the Planning Commission the location of Building A and the new location of the common property line on a transparency. The Secretary explained the background of the new medical tenants going into the complex, the restrictive covenant which had been placed on the property by the property owner and the reasons staff had issued permits in the interim. Commissioner Bernards asked whether the three unbuilt buildings would be affected by the replat. The Secretary answered that the foundation for Building A would have to be reduced, but that otherwise the buildings could be built essentially as proposed. Commissioner Holmes asked whether parking for the complex would suffice. The Secretary responded ed in the affirmative. Commissioner Y P io r Holmes asked whether there were any plans to develop the unbuilt office buildings. Mr. Dave Carland, representing the applicant, stated that that would be a function of demand which is soft at this time. Chairperson Malecki asked the applicant whether he had 8/30/90 1 anything else to add to the application. Mr. Carland responded in the negative. PUBLIC HEARING (Application No 90024) Chairperson Malecki then opened the meeting for a public hearing on Application No. 90024 and asked whether anyone present wished to speak regarding the application. She noted that there was no one present to speak and called for a motion to close the public hearing. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Motion by Commissioner Johnson seconded by Commissioner Holmes to close the public hearing. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Holmes stated that there seemed to be ample parking on the site at present. The Secretary noted that there are cross access and cross parking agreements between the main building site and the multiple building site which are presently under one ownership. He acknowledged that there was more parking now than is needed, but that future development would probably use all available parkin g on the site. In response to a question from Commissioner Johnson regarding access to the development, the Secretary explained that the access to Lot 1 (the main building site) would be across Lot 2 (the multiple building site) and noted there is a cross access agreement filed which preserves this arrangement. He explained some of the background of the Brooklyn Crossing office development as it was originally proposed and then replanned in 1986. He explained that access to the westerly building has always been across the easterly site. Commissioner Johnson expressed some concern about left turn movements from eastbound County Road 10 onto Northway Drive. He asked whether there would be a need for signals at some time in the future. The Secretary expressed doubt that signals would ever be needed. He then explained some of the background of the County's plans for County Road 10 which had been developed about five years ago and also noted that access was considered at some length when the development was first proposed. Commissioner Johnson stated that his concern is that as traffic builds, it will be difficult to cross County Road 10. The Secretary acknowledged that this might happen and that cars might go on to Xerxes Avenue North and turn north and up to Northway Drive. There followed a brief discussion of traffic movements in the area. _ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO.- 90024 (Brookdale Office Park) Motion by Commissioner Bernards seconded by Commissioner Johnson to recommend approval of Application No. 90024, subject to the following conditions: 8/30/90 2 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 the City ordinances. 3. Medical occupancy shall be limited to no more than 3,955 sq. ft. on Lot 1 and no more than 6,600 sq. ft. on Lot 2. 4. The restrictive covenant placed on the properties restricting future development and medical occupancy shall not be released until the plat is filed at the County and the foundation for Building A is reduced in size to 6,000 sq. ft. consistent with the amended site plan. L Voting in favor: Chairperson Malecki, Commissioners Bernards, Johnson and Holmes. Voting against: none. The motion passed. There followed a brief discussion of the Commission's upcoming schedule for the rest of 1990. The Secretary also discussed with the Commission the possibility of a rezoning on the Soo Line property just north of the Murphy Warehouse on France Avenue North. He noted that the City was looking at the possibility of park development in the area including the Joslyn property. Commissioner Johnson asked whether the cleanup of the Joslyn property was completed. The Secretary responded that he did not think so. He stated that there was some land farming and pumping of ground water still going on at present. He stated that he was not aware of any contamination of wells in the area. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Holmes seconded by Commissioner Bernards to adjourn the meeting of the Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously. The Planning Commission adjourned at 8:07 p.m. Chairperson 8/30/90 3 Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 90024 Applicant: Brooklyn Office Park Partnership Location: 3300 County Road 10 Request: Preliminary Plat The applicant requests preliminary plat approval to redivide the two lots containing the Brooklyn Crossing office building and the five smaller office buildings (two of which are fully built) to the east, at the northeast corner of Brooklyn Boulevard and County Road 10. The property in question is zoned C1A and is bounded on the north by single - family homes, on the east by the Honeywell Credit Union (old F & M bank) and Northway Drive, on the south by County Road 10, and on the west by Brooklyn Boulevard. The purpose of the new subdivision is to transfer some parking stalls from the multi - building site (new Lot 2) to the main building site (new Lot 1) in order to allow some medical tenants in the main building. The applicant has also submitted a revised site plan for the multi- building parcel which reduces the size of one of the future office buildings (Bldg. A) from 8,400 sq. ft. to 6,000 sq. ft. and adds 9 new parking stalls. The purpose of this revision is also to allow for some medical tenancies on the multi- building site. Medical uses require more parking per given area than general office uses. The total area of the two lot plat to be known as Brooklyn Crossing 3rd Addition, is 325,343 sq. ft. or 7.469 acres. The area of Lot 1 (the main building site) is 143,593 sq. ft. or 3.296 acres. The area of Lot 2 (the multi- building site) is 181,750 sq. ft. or 4.173 acres. The revised site plan shows 264 parking stalls on the main building site (including 2 within a parking lot island). The size of the main building is 55,193 sq. ft. (Gross Floor Area). This number of parking spaces will allow for up to approximately 3,955 sq. ft. of medical space (@ one space for 150 sq. ft. = 26.37 spaces) and 51,237 sq. ft. of general office (@ one space per 215.6 sq. ft. _ 237.63 spaces) (there is a sliding scale formula for general office parking). The multi - building parcel is to have 33,600 sq. ft. of office space and 179 parking stalls. On this site, the parking requirement for general office space is simply one space per 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The maximum medical occupancy on the multi - building parcel is 6,600 sq. ft. (6,600 = 150 = 44 spaces). The corresponding general office usage would be 27,000 sq. ft. (27,000 200 = 135 spaces). Staff have issued two permits for medical tenants in this complex, one of 1,266 sq. ft. on the multi - building site and one for 3,514 sq. ft. on the main building site. This lives within the limits for each building outlined above. The property has filed a covenant against both parcels limiting medical use to 4,800 sq. ft. on the entire complex, prohibiting development of the three 8 -30 -90 1 Application No. 90024 continued remaining office buildings, and stipulating that the covenant will only be released by City approval when all parking requirements have been met for each site so that the previously mentioned permits could be issued. This preliminary plat is in furtherance of that objective. When the plat is filed and the foundation for Building A on the multi - building site has been cut back to 6,000 sq. ft., the covenant will be released. We have encouraged the property owner to provide more parking than the general office formula requires in order to accommodate some medical tenants. This is an on -going issue with most multi - tenant office buildings in the City. In this case, there is still some flexibility since not all the buildings have been built and the entire complex is still owned in common. What we wish to avoid is parking deficiencies in the future when one or the other site may be sold to another party. In general, the preliminary plat and revised site plan appear to be in order and approval is recommended, subject to at least the following conditions: 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City ordinances. 3. Medical occupancy shall be limited to no more than 3,955 sq. ft. on Lot 1 and no more than 6,600 sq. ft. on Lot 2. 4. The restrictive covenant placed on the properties restricting future development and medical occupancy shall not be released until the plat is filed at the County and the foundation for Building A is reduced in size to 6,000 sq. ft. consistent with the amended site plan. 8 -30 -90 2 w _ _ ..... u i .M �� ,� °:.:"''� 1111 /I�j�Ij��e ,■ � maul ME N � � N . � �'. •�� IIUI � �fii i 1111� / /IQ/ // �;,� a � � • ! _ .;N r .- ■mimic �i� /III�� ■■■■■■��rrr1� • ,�,_,..�Y..�;,��,,�� --..• m .N C �� "� u1' • • ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■rrrrrr�� N .. Emiu■��11�1111�►� . ■■ 1 111/ ■ ■/I� �� un� ♦� �� "1 , ■■..,, ,�,,�•�, Emil■ ■.,,,� • a .. ' "3� • is So Rum .... ICI r •. {, v� / 1N � .� �o =�y � ■■ ■ � } ■� [Mimi mi�i� r �: „ Nu. �1� •..1 �. •111111 0� won ,. id APPLICATION 1 NO - N tis� y NN a �; WIM MEN IN _� , N A NM /N N. ..NNNN�� IS �.. , ,�, lmi ■mil \I� 1`' �.■ ��Oi A t ■l mil■■■ : �o- .. ° •.- : -. -"� �. � : �� = : ♦'� - . • � � �� , �: ';! �i� SEE III I /1u1�� mill mum _ �® ■111 / //�� j am.. �� y • �`$ \i IEEE / ■�� . �� • .ice � �� W ``�'� ■� •OI/ ■ N FA AN on IFAW MW x:111111111: �� _' ` �� • ��. ,� �IIl�i■!1: :� •� � � AEI `� �� ' •► ."�- RAT... �ii "a, 950 20 b() 857 c,3 cR 8574 gs 4 57 LOT I ��JJJ a I gsi 4 m' ,Pf )0 FO UN DFlTIO N LOT 2 x8574 58, 6 1855 85Z 4 05 858 658 bi Bss 857 BLOC 559 � �� 1 � ��c � � us6 � II /i. NB7'58 "08'E 107.18 - - S84' 7'38- A�47, t.. P-qz, 1 3 del 43. A, j3 5' \�\ 6o J x 57 i F- tiEk eu,LO�GS m ' z 1 ExST G6. W ! �.•FetiCE til --t'y , `v�Y z'°�(JC ^Kti' �• /� I . S !fF —. -. .(/._.�. r N - o� j.:� s nor u CJ sd E ,UWfR �\y , CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF :BROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE: 569 -3300 CENTER FAX: 561 -0717 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE September 6, 1990 911 TO: Sy Knapp FROM: Diane Spector SUBJ: Additional Information For Consideration Concerning Special Assessment Procedures The following information regarding special assessment procedures may be helpful: the process should an assessment be contested or appealed; the process for deferral of special assessments by senior citizens and persons retired due to total and permanent disability; and the City's standard street improvement project assessment polices, and payment options. Objections and Appeals Chapter 429 of the Minnesota Statutes sets forth special assessment procedures and regulations. Statutes require • a hearing at which time property owners may contest or appeal their own assessment. The Council may consider both written or verbal objections at the hearing, but statutes require that all appeals as to the amount of the assessment must be made in writing either prior to or at the hearing, and must be signed by the property owner. Objections The Council may wish to consider some objections at the hearing. However, it is recommended that the Council defer consideration of any substantive objections until a future meeting. Substantive objections include those which would require further information and investigation, and any contested assessments. The following is the procedure for consideration of a contested assessment: 1. The city will present its case by first calling witnesses who may testify by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the city has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning the city's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. ,sasauacrn 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape - recorded. 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. App eals An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the mayor or clerk of the city within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten days after service upon the mayor or clerk. (Source: Local Imlrovement Guide, League of Minnesota Cities) Deferral for Senior Citizens and Disabled Persons City policy allows qualified senior citizens and persons retired due to total and permanent disability to defer some or all of a special assessment. As amended at the June 25, 1990 Council meeting, the following requirements apply: • 1. The property must be homesteaded. 2. The property owner or spouse must be of at least 65 years of age or retired due to permanent and total disability. 3. Household income may not exceed $21,650. The policy states that the maximum annual payment that qualifying property owners would be required to make would be 1.5 percent of household income. In other words, if the household income was $10,000, the maximum annual payment on all special assessments would be $150. Interested persons may apply by contacting the City Engineering Office. They will be asked to fill out two forms, one a City application and one a Hennepin County application, and to provide proof of income such as the previous year's income tax form. Staff will then calculate the maximum annual payment, determine the sum of annual payments on all outstanding special assessments on the property, and will calculate the amount of the deferral. The deferred portion of the assessment is certified to Hennepin County as a separate levy. The principle accrues interest until the deferred levy is paid, usually as a result of sale of the property. Street Improvement Standard Special Assessments The City annually establishes assessment rates for street improvement projects in residential areas. This policy establishes a per lot charge for R -1 zoned properties used as single family sites and which cannot be legally subdivided. R -2 and R -3 zoned properties are assessed a per front foot charge. R -4 through R -7 zoned properties are assessed a rate based on project cost and the benefit to the property. The rates for 1989 and 1990 are as follows: 1989 1990 R -1 $1,325 $1,410 R -2 $17.60 /ff $18.74/ff Minimum charge: R -1 rate R -3 Assessable frontage x R -2 rate Number of resident units Corner Lot and Double- Frontage Lot Assessment Option- For street reconstruction improvement projects in R -1 residential areas the City has established the policy which provides that "corner lots" and /or "double - frontage" lots will not be assessed twice (i.e. - for improvements to their "front" street and to their "side" street or "rear frontage "). In addition, the owners of such properties are to be given the option of being assessed at the time of the first improvement or at the time of the second improvement, with the understanding that the rates charged will be those in effect at the time when the assessment is levied. Thus, if an owner opts to defer assessments for a current improvement, his future assessment may be considerably higher because of increased construction costs, because of changes in the City's policy regarding cost participation in such improvements (the current assessment rate reflects approximately 30% of the costs for reconstructing an existing residential street to current residential street standards), or because of other factors. Payment Options Available to Property Owners Once an assessment roll is adopted by the Council, the owner of each property has the following payment options: 1. Pay the entire amount of the special assessment, without interest, if payment is made within 30 days of the date of adoption by the Council. 2. Pay the entire amount plus interest from the date of adoption by the Council until December 31, if payment is made between the 30th day following adoption and December 31. 3. Payment on an installment basis, with the owners annual property tax payments, including interest charges accrued to December 31 for each year in which payment is made. The term of the installments varies, to reflect the anticipated life of the improvement. (Example: Weed removal assessments are levied on a single- installment basis, whereas street improvements are levied on a 10 -year or 20 -year basis). The term of the levy is shown under the "Levy Information" section on each of the proposed assessment rolls. 1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS SEPTEMBER 10, 1990 General Introduction to Public Hearin s Regarding Special Assessments These 10 hearings cover proposed special assessments for four types of service charges and for six improvement projects. Regarding the proposed assessments for service charges, it is noted that all property owners affected by these charges either received prior notice of the services to be performed or signed written agreements with the City relating o g these services. Regarding the proposed assessments for improvement projects, it is noted that improvement hearings were conducted by the City Council prior to proceeding with these improvements. Regarding tonights' hearings, it is noted that individual notices have been sent to all property owners whose property is proposed to be assessed for the services provided or for the improvements made. Also, notices of these hearings have been published in the City's official newspaper. (Copy attached) Deferment of Special Assessments for Persons who are 65 years old or older, or who are totalled permanently disabled (See Slide) Payment Options • payment in full, without interest, within 30 days after approval of assessment roll by Council • payment in full, with interest, after 30 days, but before November 15th • installment payments, with property taxes, with first installment in 1991. Term of payment varies with each improvement. Recommended interest rate = 10% Recommended Procedures For Consideration Of Objections • for obvious errors or minor adjustments: adopt a motion(s) approving the corrections or adjustments, and directing staff to prepare a resolution for formal consideration at the September 24, 1990 meeting • for substantive objections (including all written objections): adopt a motion(s) deferring consideration of these special assessments to an adjourned hearing (date to be established later) • August 10, 1990 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed are the following 3 documents: (1) an official Notice of Public Hearing on proposed special assessments affecting your property; (2) a copy of the proposed special assessment roll pertaining to your property; and (3) the levy roll information sheet. The public hearing on these special assessments has been scheduled for September 10, 1990 in City Hall. If you have any objections to the assessments, please follow the procedures outlined within the official Notice of Public Hearing. Special assessment charges for your property are highlighted on the enclosed proposed special assessment roll. The total principle will be payable in equal annual installments for the period stated on the levy roll information sheet. Interest is paid on the unpaid balance; the rate of interest is estimated to be 10 percent. (The actual interest rate will be determined by the City Council.) The total principle amount of special assessments may be prepaid without interest to the City Treasurer within 30 days after the adoption by the City Council of the resolution levying the assessments. If the Council certifies your special assessment at the September 10 hearing, you may pay the assessment in full, without interest, any time between September 11 and October 10, 1990. If payment is made after October 10 but before November 15, the total principle amount of the assessment may be prepaid with interest calculated from October 1, 1990 to the date of the payment. No partial prepayments of assessments are authorized. On November 15, 1990 and on each November 15th thereafter, the first and succeeding special assessment installments will be placed on the roll of property taxes payable in 1991 and succeeding years by the Hennepin County Director of Finance. The first installment of special assessments will include 15 months interest, from October 1, 1990 to December 31, 1991. Interest for one year on all unpaid installments will be added to each subsequent installment when due. Prepayment of the remaining special assessment principle, not yet so placed on the tax rolls for collection in any year, may be made to the City Treasurer prior to November 15 of any year. If you have questions regarding this assessment, please contact the City Engineering Office at 569 -3340. If you have questions regarding payment, please contact the City Assessor's Office at 569 -3310. IMPORTANT NOTE: please refer to the notice of public hearing for information regarding deferral of special assessments and auxiliary aids for handicapped persons. Sincerely, Diane F. Spector Public Works Coordinator � a CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSb1ENTS • Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, will meet at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, on Monday, September 10, 1990, at 8 P.M. local time, to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed assessments for the following improvements: DISEASED SHADE TREE REMOVAL COSTS It is proposed to assess the cost of diseased shade tree removal to those tracts or parcels where trees were removed during 1989 and 1990 by written agreement with the property owner or by order of the City Council pursuant to City Ordinances, Section 19 -1501 through 19 -1506. DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY ACCOUNTS It is proposed to assess public utility charges to those tracts or parcels where such charges were delinquent as of July 1, 1990, and, after due notice to the property owner, remain unpaid. This assessment is made pursuant to City Ordinances, Section 4 -105. DELINQUENT WEED DESTRUCTION ACCOUNTS It is proposed to assess the cost of noxious weed destruction to those tracts or parcels where, pursuant to City Ordinance Section 19 -1601 through 19 -1604, noxious weeds were destroyed by order of the city Weed Inspector and the cost for such destruction, having been billed to the property owner, remains unpaid. PUBLIC UTILITY HOOKUP CHARGES It is proposed to assess the cost of water hookup charges to those parcels where, pursuant to City Ordinances, Section 4 -201, property owners have signed agreements requesting that these charges be assessed. ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Improvement Project Number 1989 -08 Concrete paving and storm sewer construction in the alley between Fremont and Girard Avenues North, from 55th to 57th Avenues North. The amount proposed to be assessed is $62,596.86. Improvement Proiect Number 1989 -15 Concrete paving and storm sewer construction in the alley between Girard and Humboldt Avenues North, from 54th to 55th Avenues North. The amount proposed to be assessed is $29,308.02. Improvement Project Number 1989 -16 Concrete paving and storm sewer construction in the alley between Emerson and Fremont Avenues North, from 53rd to 54th Avenues North. The amount proposed to be assessed is $26,150.62. Improvement Project Number 1989 -17 Bituminous paving in the alley between Lakeview and Twin Lake Avenues, from Lakebreeze to Lakeside Avenues North. The amount proposed to be assessed is $10,463.00. . It is proposed to assess all properties abutting each improved alley. IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NUMBERS 1989 -26 and 1989 -27 ® Street construction including storm sewer improvements, regrading, subgrade preparation, installation of concrete curb and gutter, bituminous paving, construction of sidewalks and bikeways, and landscaping. The project location is along Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue North /66th Avenue North from Shingle Creek to T.H. 252, and along Humboldt Avenue North from 65th to 69th Avenues North. For purposes of assessment the projects have been separated into three segments and three proposed levies: 1989 -26A, for which it is proposed to assess $223,643.05; 1989 -2613, for which it is proposed to assess $213,666.12; and 1989 -27, for which it is proposed to assess $95,100.00. The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: 1989 -26A: All properties abutting that portion of Freeway Boulevard which lies between Shingle Creek and Humboldt Avenue North, and all properties not abutting Freeway Boulevard but lying between Shingle Creek Parkway and Humboldt Avenue North that are north of 1- 94/694 and south of Freeway Boulevard. 1989 -26B: All properties lying between Humboldt Avenue North and T.H. 252 which: are zoned or used as commercial, industrial, public, or multiple family which abut the north side of 65th /66th Avenue North, or which lie north of I- 94/694 and south of 65th /66th Avenue North; and all properties located within Block 1 of Riverwood Townhomes Addition. 1989 -27: All properties abutting that portion of Humboldt Avenue North which lies north of a point approximately 200 feet north of Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue North; all properties located within Block 1 of Humboldt Square Estates; and all properties located within Block 1 of Rosemary Terrace. IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NUMBER 1988 -18 Reconstruction of the existing roadway, including: storm sewer modifications; curb and gutter; grading, base preparation, and surfacing; sidewalk and /or trail construction; landscaping and lighting. The project location is along West River Road, from 66th to 73rd Avenues North. It is proposed to assess those properties abutting West River Road, from 66th to 73rd Avenues North. The amount proposed to be assessed is $79,401.82. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION FOR OBJECTIONS TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment as to a specific parcel of land may be made unless the owner has filed a written objection to that assessment, signed by the affected property owner, with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented such a written objection to the presiding officer at the hearing. These assessments are now on file at City Hall and open to public inspection. Written or oral objections to the proposed assessments will be considered at this meeting, but the City Council may consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION FOR DEFERRED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS • Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the City Council may, at its discretion, defer the payment of some or all of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older, or by a person retired due to permanent and total disability for whom it would be a hardship to make payment. ® The City Council has established the following qualifying conditions for applicants for deferred payment of special assessments: 1. Applicant or spouse must be 65 years of age or older, or retired due to permanent and total disability. 2. Annual household income may not exceed $21,650. 3. The aggregate total of previous special assessment installments plus the first year installment of the current levy must exceed one and one -half (1 -1/2) percent of the applicant's annual household income. The applicant will be required to pay a maximum of one and one -half (1 -1/2) percent of annual household income toward the special assessment; any excess can be deferred. 4. Special assessments levied due to a failure to pay charges for City services or failure to comply to City codes are not eligible for deferment and will not be included in calculating the aggregate total of annual special assessment installments. When deferment of special assessment terminates, for any reason provided in the law, all accumulated deferments plus applicable interest become due. Further information regarding deferred assessments and application forms are available at the City Engineering office, 569 -3340. Important Note: TO QUALIFY FOR DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, APPLICATIONS MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1, 1990. AUXILIARY AIDS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours (4 days) in advance of the hearing. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 569 - 3350 to make arrangements. D.K. Weeks, City Clerk By order of the City Council Published in the Brooklyn Center Post on August 22nd, 1990. • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERRAL POLICY 1 . APPLICANT OR SPOUSE 65 OR OLDER, OR RETIRED DUE TO PERMANENT AND TOTAL DISABILITY • 2. HOUSEHOLD INCOME LESS THAN $21,650 3. TOTAL ANNUAL PAYMENTS WOULD EXCEED 1-1/2 PERCENT OF ANNUAL INCOME • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING September 10, 1990 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE OR IMPROVEMENT: Tree Removal Costs Levy #11786 - 3 years; Levy #11787 - 5 years MAP OF PROJECT AREA: N/A MAP OF AREAS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED: N/A PICTURES OF IMPROVEMENT: N/A COST SUMMARY /SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: N/A WRITTEN OBJECTIONS RECEIVED "NOTED FOR THE RECORD ": None CORRECTIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: Adopt Two Resolutions SENIOR /HANDICAP DEFERMENTS: None • OPEN PUBLIC HEARING: CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING: MOTIONS) TO CORRECT ERRORS OR MINOR ADJUSTMENTS MOTIONS) TO DEFER CONSIDERATION (OF SPECIFIED ASSESSMENTS) TO AN ADJOURNED HEARING ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CERTIFYING THIS ASSESSMENT & ROLL TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS i CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER . SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING September 10, 1990 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE OR IMPROVEMENT: Delinquent Public Utility Accounts Levy #11788 - 1 year MAP OF PROJECT AREA: N/A MAP OF AREAS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED: N/A PICTURES OF IMPROVEMENT: N/A COST SUMMARY /SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: N/A WRITTEN OBJECTIONS RECEIVED "NOTED FOR THE RECORD ": None CORRECTIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: None SENIOR /HANDICAP DEFERMENTS: None OPEN PUBLIC HEARING: CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING: MOTIONS) TO CORRECT ERRORS OR MINOR ADJUSTMENTS MOTIONS) TO DEFER CONSIDERATION (OF SPECIFIED ASSESSMENTS) TO AN ADJOURNED HEARING ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CERTIFYING THIS ASSESSMENT & ROLL TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING September 10, 1990 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE OR IMPROVEMENT: Weed Destruction Charges Levy #11789 - 1 year MAP OF PROJECT AREA: N/A MAP OF AREAS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED: N/A PICTURES OF IMPROVEMENT: N/A COST SUMMARY /SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: N/A WRITTEN OBJECTIONS RECEIVED "NOTED FOR THE RECORD ": (copies attached) Name Richard R. Adams Address 7205 Fremont Ave. N. CORRECTIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: None SENIOR /HANDICAP DEFERMENTS: None OPEN PUBLIC HEARING: CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING: MOTIONS) TO CORRECT ERRORS OR MINOR ADJUSTMENTS MOTIONS) TO DEFER CONSIDERATION (OF SPECIFIED ASSESSMENTS) TO AN ADJOURNED HEARING i ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CERTIFYING THIS ASSESSMENT & ROLL TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS Z ,��i� -rc� �_ . 11996' C E I V F 0 �,��K y� � 5sy3 � Neu E �� e�^ �jee�t �� a�L' e� o� a ��x'� weeq� Ho�� U��'Ja�� er c,v�'� �T�a �u,- - t��- v .� ln�vy l�iG ��ow ��e �� a r�o?�rc3u� u.�E�c� e�1- ac�i��a�1 or vt�� o�.SUN� ��uS /S ��- �o le �vte��r r �r �� v-�s� �� r � �37. S 14 e c) u t4ll ULf'_��( oi�� /�1 ��tice.�� as�ti `Newt f T / f12,, G�a� e C , u4 p � ��c �d o l�C�� a�(t ��t C� 04 e � �1 N_t��Z�� (�C�'�j M � ke-e- t s �`�� ups c` lS,. hs, - t - e-att ne)tc tLle-s e �sseSSu� air 1 / G� �. • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER . SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING September 10, 1990 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE OR IMPROVEMENT: Public Utility Hookup Charges Levy #11806 - 10 years MAP OF PROJECT AREA: N/A MAP OF AREAS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED: N/A PICTURES OF IMPROVEMENT: N/A COST SUMMARY /SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: N/A WRITTEN OBJECTIONS RECEIVED "NOTED FOR THE RECORD ": None CORRECTIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: None SENIOR /HANDICAP DEFERMENTS: None OPEN PUBLIC HEARING: CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING: MOTIONS) TO CORRECT ERRORS OR MINOR ADJUSTMENTS MOTIONS) TO DEFER CONSIDERATION (OF SPECIFIED ASSESSMENTS) TO AN ADJOURNED HEARING ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CERTIFYING THIS ASSESSMENT & ROLL TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING September 10, 1990 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE OR IMPROVEMENT: Alley Improvement Project 1989 -08 Fremont /Girard, 55th to 57th Levy #11790 - 20 years MAP OF PROJECT AREA: N/A MAP OF AREAS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED: N/A PICTURES OF IMPROVEMENT: (See Slides) COST SUMMARY /SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: Attached WRITTEN OBJECTIONS RECEIVED "NOTED FOR THE RECORD ": Name Address Name Address CORRECTIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: None SENIOR /HANDICAP DEFERMENTS: None OPEN PUBLIC HEARING: CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING: MOTIONS) TO CORRECT ERRORS OR MINOR ADJUSTMENTS MOTIONS) TO DEFER CONSIDERATION (OF SPECIFIED ASSESSMENTS) TO AN ADJOURNED HEARING ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CERTIFYING THIS ASSESSMENT & ROLL TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -08 FREMONT /GIRARD - 55TH TO 57TH PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (FINAL) $ 97,853.99 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $ 62,596.86 OTHER FUNDS $ 35,257.13 i PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PER BUILDABLE SITE AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL DIRECT ACCESS $ 3,215.33 $ 3,016.13 INDIRECT ACCESS $ 989.33 $ 827.00 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TWENTY (20) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING September p er 10, 1990 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE OR IMPROVEMENT: Alley Improvement Project 1989 -15 Girard /Humboldt, 54th to 55th Levy #11791 - 20 years MAP OF PROJECT AREA: N/A MAP OF AREAS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED: N/A PICTURES OF IMPROVEMENT: (See slides) COST SUMMARY /SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: Attached WRITTEN OBJECTIONS RECEIVED "NOTED FOR THE RECORD ": Name Address Name Address CORRECTIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: Adopt Resolution SENIOR /HANDICAP DEFERMENTS: Adopt Resolution OPEN PUBLIC HEARING: CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING: MOTIONS) TO CORRECT ERRORS OR MINOR ADJUSTMENTS MOTIONS) TO DEFER CONSIDERATION (OF SPECIFIED ASSESSMENTS) TO AN ADJOURNED HEARING ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CERTIFYING THIS ASSESSMENT & ROLL TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -15 GIRARD /HUMBOLDT - 54TH TO 55TH PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (FINAL) $ 38,136.04 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $ 29,308.02 OTHER FUNDS $ 8,828.02 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PER BUILDABLE SITE AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL DIRECT ACCESS $ 1,953.78 $ 1,875.03 INDIRECT ACCESS $ 697.78 $ 640.25 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TWENTY (20) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER • SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING September 10, 1990 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE OR IMPROVEMENT: Alley Improvement Project 1989 -16 Emerson /Fremont, 53rd to 54th Levy #11792 - 20 years MAP OF PROJECT AREA: N/A MAP OF AREAS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED: N/A PICTURES OF IMPROVEMENT: (See slides) COST SUMMARY /SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: Attached WRITTEN OBJECTIONS RECEIVED "NOTED FOR THE RECORD ": Name Address Name Address CORRECTIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: None SENIOR /HANDICAP DEFERMENTS: Adopt Resolution OPEN PUBLIC HEARING: CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING: MOTIONS) TO CORRECT ERRORS OR MINOR ADJUSTMENTS MOTIONS) TO DEFER CONSIDERATION (OF SPECIFIED ASSESSMENTS) TO AN ADJOURNED HEARING ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CERTIFYING THIS ASSESSMENT & ROLL TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -16 EMERSON /FREMONT /- 53RD TO 54TH PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (FINAL) $ 39,487.49 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $ 26,150.62 OTHER FUNDS $ 13,336.87 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PER BUILDABLE SITE AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL DIRECT ACCESS $ 1,176.84 $ 1,176.84 INDIRECT ACCESS $ 430.00 $ 430.00 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TWENTY (20) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING September 10, 1990 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE OR IMPROVEMENT: Alley Improvement Project 1989 -17 Lakeview /Twin Lake, Lakebreeze to Lakeside Levy #11793 - 10 years MAP OF PROJECT AREA: N/A MAP OF AREAS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED: N/A PICTURES OF IMPROVEMENT: (See Slides) COST SUMMARY /SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: Attached WRITTEN OBJECTIONS RECEIVED "NOTED FOR THE RECORD ": Name Address Name . Address CORRECTIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: None SENIOR /HANDICAP DEFERMENTS: None OPEN PUBLIC HHEARING: CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING: MOTIONS) TO CORRECT ERRORS OR MINOR ADJUSTMENTS MOTION(S) TO DEFER CONSIDERATION (OF SPECIFIED ASSESSMENTS) TO AN ADJOURNED HEARING • ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CERTIFYING THIS ASSESSMENT & ROLL TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TAR ROLLS ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -17 LAKEVIEW /TWIN LAKE - LAKESIDE TO LAKEBREEZE PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (FINAL) $ 13,634.29 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $ 10,463.00 OTHER FUNDS $ 3,171 .29 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PER BUILDABLE SITE AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL DIRECT ACCESS $ 1,778.71 $ 1,778.71 INDIRECT ACCESS $ 523.15 $ 523.15 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TEN (10) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING September 10, 1990 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE OR IMPROVEMENT: Street Improvement Project 1988 -18 West River Road Levy #11799 - 20 years MAP OF PROJECT AREA: Attached MAP OF AREAS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED: Attached PICTURES OF IMPROVEMENT: N/A COST SUMMARY /SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: Attached WRITTEN OBJECTIONS RECEIVED "NOTED FOR THE RECORD ": (Copy attached Name Ubaldo Ramos Address 6836 West River Road • Name Address CORRECTIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: None SENIOR /HANDICAP DEFERMENTS: None OTHER DEFERMENTS: Adopt Resolution OPEN PUBLIC HEARING: CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING: MOTIONS) TO CORRECT ERRORS OR MINOR ADJUSTMENTS MOTIONS) TO DEFER CONSIDERATION (OF SPECIFIED ASSESSMENTS) TO AN ADJOURNED HEARING ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CERTIFYING THIS ASSESSMENT & ROLL TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS • STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1988 -18 WEST RIVER ROAD PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (ESTIMATED) $1,552,837 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $79,402 OTHER FUNDS $1,473,435 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PER BUILDABLE SITE AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL R -1, PER PARCEL $1,351.00 $1,351.00 R -2, PER FRONT FOOT $17.95 $17.95 R -4, PER SQUARE FOOT $0.3562 $0.3562 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TWENTY (20) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT 6836'V'ES T RIVER, ROAD • '`✓',!NNEAPOLIS MI,NNES; TA 55-133 r N ORTH�ti ESTERN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (6? 2) 560-4051 �`.ERAL AGENT Brooklyn Center,MN Aug. 30, 1990 Mayor of Brooklyn Center City Hall Dear Sirs: I am a homeowner at 6836 West River Road, my home is an old house over 60 years old ithas one bathroom and only two bedrooms, I am the only resident at this address and my iname in 1989 was $10,900.00, this year might be even less. lam being assessed $2;7 02.00 and Iam appealing this assessement, since most CE my neighbors are paying only $1,35 LOO and some have just as large property like the one in the corner of 79 th and W. River Rd.. I am asking you to reconsider and exempt me from paying this amount. Sincerely, Ubaldo amos. �� CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARING September 10, 1990 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE OR IMPROVEMENT: Street Improvement Projects 1898 -26 and 1989 -27 Freeway Boulevard /65th /66th, Shingle Creek to T.H. 252 and Humboldt Avenue, 65th to 69th Levy Nos. 11796, 11797, and 11798 MAP OF PROJECT AREA: Attached MAP OF AREAS PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED: Attached PICTURES OF IMPROVEMENT: N/A COST SUMMARY /SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: Attached WRITTEN OBJECTIONS RECEIVED "NOTED FOR THE RECORD ": (Copies attached) Name Lvnn Torkildson Address 6620 Camden Drive • Name Address CORRECTIONS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF: None SENIOR /HANDICAP DEFERMENTS: None OPEN PUBLIC HEARING: CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING: MOTIONS) TO CORRECT ERRORS OR MINOR ADJUSTMENTS MOTIONS) TO DEFER CONSIDERATION (OF SPECIFIED ASSESSMENTS) TO AN ADJOURNED HEARING ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CERTIFYING THIS ASSESSMENT & ROLL TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS 1 I � t'• i ,I , � 114. �vE. Hi; ` 56114. AVE. N.1 i HUMBOLDT AVE. N. CONSTRUCTION 1 � 1989 -27 1990 -12 _ ar14. A :_o, n i HUMBOLDT AVE DUPONT AVE. N SIGNAL 1990 -11 ! d9pOti WTH - � SIGNAL MODIFICATION A& v.l 55TH AVE. t1 Z 41 y� 1 i Z :M�rS- ?il.l i i i t t FREEWAY BLVD /65TH AVE. N. CONSTRUCTION 1989 -26 cm FREEWAY BLVD SIGNALS 1988-25— t � i t ! PROJECT L MAP CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FE MEPIN COLWT - Y, MW ESOTA FIGURE 1 65 TH 66TH AVE ASSESSMENT AREA W a ti Ct 7 0 5 65TH ��wv vvvvvvvvvvtivvv � ,�,�" ��.vtvvvvvv�tvv vv W p } wv�vwvvwa�ti`�vvvv • W p m �wvvvvww� �v��vvvv� ��vvwvvv�v �.v.v.�vvd �w��wwvv e vvw ZONE A - 733,200 SF / 16.8 AC ZONE B- 2,448,543 SF / 56.2 AC R -3 805 FEET T OF FRONTAGE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WMEPIN COUNTY, MNIMM"A FIGURE 3 d Y 2 a z Lu W =- w w T f i rlr C IV I ZONE A - 846 SF / 18.5 AC ZONE B-1,536.1750 SF / 35.3 AC FREEWAY BLVD. ASSESSMENT AREA CITY • OF BROOKLYN CENTER HEMEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 L LME ct. 2625 )T W *�. AV E. ; 68THLAI w A 1-1. a it ,_Z 1 w 67TH LA.i 1 � 67TH I /. BROOKLYN CENTER HIGH SCHOOL t *01". > I'Z Lti C2 Y r H UMBOLDT A A AREA M ZONE A 1,233 SF / 28.3 AC CITY Of BROOKLYN CENTER HENNEPIN GOUN", MNNE'`50TA FIGURE 4 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -26A FREEWAY BOULEVARD - SHINGLE CREEK TO HUMBOLDT AVENUE PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (ESTIMATED) $375,074.86 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $223,643.05 OTHER FUNDS $151,431.81 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RATES AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL ZONE A, PER SQUARE FOOT $0.2507 $0.1859 ZONE B, PER SQUARE FOOT $0.0648 $0.0480 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TEN (10) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -26B 65TH /66TH AVENUE, HUMBOLDT AVENUE TO T.H. 252 PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (ESTIMATED) $387,387.89 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $213,666.12 OTHER FUNDS $173,721.77 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RATES AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL ZONE A, PER SQUARE FOOT $0.1930 $0.1815 ZONE B, PER SQUARE FOOT $0.0279 $0.0263 R -3, PER FRONT FOOT $18.74 $18.74 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TEN (10) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT w STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -27 HUMBOLDT AVENUE, 65TH TO 69TH AVENUES PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (ESTIMATED) $234,078.16 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $95,100.00 OTHER FUNDS $138,978.16 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RATES AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL PER SQUARE FOOT $0.0771 $0.0771 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TEN (10) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT , � Y TO: BROOKLYN CENTER MAYOR OR CLERK FROM: LYNN TORKILDSON DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -26 This letter is in objection to the assessment for IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -26, specifically assessment area 1989 -26B. I reside at 6620 Camden Drive in Riverwood Townhomes. I am the owner of a SINGLE FAMILY Townhome. By law I cannot have more than one family living in my home. I feel the $145.25 assessment on my property is unjust and illegal. According to your assessment 1989 -26B "all properties lying between Humboldt Avenue North and TH 252 which: are zoned or used as commercial, industrial, public, or multiple family. 11 will be assessed. Now refer to the SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL, specifically property identification no. 36- 119 - 21 -13 -0096. The owner is listed as Lynn Torkildson and the • address is listed as 6620 Camden Drive. I am challenging the City of Brooklyn Center to prove that either Lynn Torkildson or 6620 Camden Drive is commercial, industrial, public, or multiple family unit. I am a home owner not a business owner. I see no income or profit from my townhome. I do not wish to insult anyones intelligence but I'ld like to make a simple analogy. My home is like any other Brooklyn Center single family unit in that I was approved for a loan, I make a mortgage payment, pay property tax, and am responsible for any and all costs incurred from interior and exterior repairs. I do not have a management company to replace worn or out dated decor. And if I choose to move I cannot simply leave my notice and pack. You yourself have differentiated between a Riverwood townhome and Georgetown Townhomes or Chippawa Apartments by listing each of our addresses seperatly but theirs as a group. Georgetown and Chippawa are owned and operated for a profit. As far as my property benefiting from this project, the location of my home is quite a distance from any major improvements. I received what you label as a pedestrian /bicycle trailway, which in fact is nothing more than a second sidewalk constructed along side the existing sidewalk which was never congested with pedestrian or bicycle traffic. This so called bicycle trailway has been nic -named the bike trail to nowhere because it comes to 1 an end at 252 N, which most safety minded parents would not- advise or encourage their children to ride to. This second sidewalk has no increasing value to my home. Rather it took out frontage property and came dangerously close to pine trees that may not survive. Its construction was a burden by closing our street from July 12, 1990 to the first week in August and causing me to live with constant dirt, mud, and cement dust blocking my only way out to my bus stop every morning. The other part of the improvement project remotely close to my home is the turn lane. In three years I have never experienced a long or frustrating delay at the intersection of 66th and Camden Drive. Neither projects located near my home benefit my property's value. As I indicated at the City Council meeting on April 9, 1990, my home is on a block that holds only 4 or 5 more homes than the average Brooklyn Center city block. Camden Drive is not a thru street, therefore traffic generated from our block includes residents, guests and service companies only. The average Brooklyn Center block being a thru street would generate traffic including residents, guests, service companies and thru traffic. It is not fair to assume that we create more traffic. I own a single family home, I do not own commercial, industrial, public, or multiple family property. Therefore by the city's own decision I should not be assessed. I am requesting that the City Council reconsider the assessment. If I am assessed I will assume that the City Council has changed law and that I can legally have more than one family living at 6620 Camden Drive. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I do not wish to come across with a hostile attitude but I hope that as fellow home owners you can understand my concern not only with this assessment but in the event that there are other assessments in the future. 2 CITY B 1 0 OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9 90 � � Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION DELETING ONE ASSESSMENT FROM PROPOSED LEVY #11786 DEPT. APPROVAL SY KNAPP, DIIREC 4OR OF P06M WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached The proposed levy roll for diseased tree removal where costs are less than $300 • included a $204.60 assessment for the property at 507 - 69th Avenue, owned by Outreach Group Homes. This assesment was included on the roll by error. Outreach Group Homes has paid this tree removal cost in full. Council Action Reauired A resolution deleting this assessment from the proposed levy #11786 is provided. r Member introduced the following resolution and flo'/ moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DELETING ONE ASSESSMENT FROM PROPOSED LEVY #11786 WHEREAS, the proposed special assessment levy roll for proposed levy #11786 included an assessment of $204.60 on PID #36- 119 -21 -12 -0037; and WHEREAS, this assessment has been placed on the levy roll in error. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the proposed special assessment in the amount of $204.60 on PID #36- 119 -21 -12 -0037 is hereby deleted from proposed levy #11786. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number �L REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION DELETING ONE ASSESSMENT AND AMENDING ONE ASSESSMENT ON PROPOSED LEVY #11787 DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, DIRECTOR OF PuBUc WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: �r► ►��,�; No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached The proposed levy roll for diseased tree removal where costs are greater than —� $300 included $467.00 for the property at 6836 Orchard Avenue, and a $395.00 assessment for the property at 6207 Chowen Avenue. 6836 Orchard Avenue This property changed hands on June 28, 1990. One tree was removed two weeks prior to the sale; another tree was marked for removal the day before c previous property y losing. The P p pert owner had Y asked to be assessed for the cost of the first, and protested his responsibility for the second. The current property owners were not aware of the first tree's removal, and protested their responsibility for the second. The revious property P p ert owner P y prior to moving in out of g the country, recently submitted ted payment in full for the two trees. The cost no longer need be assessed against the property. 6207 Chowen Avenue Two trees were removed from this property. The charge on the levy roll, $395.00, was for both tree and stump rem city's not able to fit his stump grinding machine a into T the area of the c yard a where w the trees were located, and thus did not grind the two stumps. The amount to be assessed against the property should be $315.20, the cost for tree removal only. . Council Action Required A resolution deleting one assessment and amending the second is provided. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DELETING ONE ASSESSMENT AND AMENDING ONE ASSESSMENT ON PROPOSED LEVY #11787 WHEREAS, the proposed special assessment levy roll for proposed levy #11786 included an assessment of $467.00 on PID #33- 119 -21 -11 -0009; and WHEREAS, the charge resulting in said special assessment was paid in full by the previous property owner; and WHEREAS, said assessment roll included an assessment of $395.00 on PID #34- 119 -21 -43 -0028; and WHEREAS, this assessment was for the cost of removal of two trees and stumps, and it has been determined that the City's tree contractor has not been able to remove the stumps; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The proposed special assessment in the amount of $467.00 on PID #33- 119 -21 -11 -0009 is hereby deleted for proposed levy #11787. 2. The proposed special assessment in the amount of $395.00 on PID #34- 119 -21 -43 -0028 is hereby amended to $315.20. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/lo/9 Agenda Item Number 3 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION IT DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TREE REMOVAL COST TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS DEPT. APPROVAL: 4 SY KNAPP, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: V No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) On July 23, 1990 the City Council adopted resolution 90 -147 providing for public hearing regarding proposed assessments for tree removal costs. The purpose of this resolution is to certify special assessments for tree removal costs to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. All special assessments are for tree removal costs of trees declared a public nuisance in past City Council resolutions, and the trees have been removed by the City Tree Contractor in accordance with the established policy. The special assessments recommended are to property owners who (1) have signed Tree Removal Agreements and requested that the costs be assessed to their taxes; (2) have been invoiced for but have failed to pay removal costs as agreed to in the before mentioned signed agreements; or (3) have had not responded to the City's order and have had trees removed in accordance with the procedure established when a property owner fails to respond to official notices (i.e. Public Nuisance Procedure). All property owners have been duly notified by certified mail of this special assessment hearing. Recommendation Following the public hearing, the City Council should consider adoption of the attached resolution which would certify the proposed special assessments for collection on the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. Ila- - 3 i Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TREE REMOVAL COST TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the Tree Inspector of the City of Brooklyn Center has caused the removal of trees on certain properties within the City during 1989 and 1990 under the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.023 and by written agreement with the owners of such property; and WHEREAS, two assessment rolls, a copy of each of which is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, have been prepared by the City Clerk, one tabulating those properties where tree removal costs are less than or equal to $300.00 and one tabulating those properties where tree removal costs are greater than $300.00 together with the amounts proposed to be assessed to each property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for tree removal costs: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Said assessment rolls of tree removal costs are hereby adopted and certified as the following levies: Tree Removal costs less than or equal to $300 Levy No. 11786 Tree Removal costs greater than $300 Levy No. 11787 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of years as listed below. The first of the installments shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from October 1, 1990. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October 1, 1990 until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. a. Assessments less than or equal to $300.00 are payable in three annual installments. b. Assessments greater than $300.00 are payable in five annual installments. RESOLUTION NO. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION ------------------- ---------------- Improvement Project No.: 1989 -03 & 1990 -13 Levy No.: 11786 Description: Cost of diseased shade tree removal to Fund /Code No.: 17/027 those tracts or parcels where trees were removed during 1989 or 1990, by written Levy Description: TREE REMOVAL 89 -3 agreement with the property owner or by order of the City Tree Inspector at a cost of $300 or less. Location: Various City ocations Y Levy runs three (3) years with interest at the rate of ten (10) percent. Improvement Hearing Date: NIA First payment, with property taxes payable in 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: N/A Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 by Resolution No.: NIA Adopted on: Assessment District: N/A by Resolution No.: Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Method of Apportionment: Direct cost, interest and administrative costs Cost Summary from Resolution No.: N/A TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: NIA Less Direct City Share: (Fund M.S.A.) Less Other Payments: TOTAL ASSESSED: $4,129.30 City Property: Other Public Property: Private Property: $4,129.30 0 0 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DISEASED TREE REMOVALS MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 3 YEAR LEVY PAGE 2 OF 3 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11786 01- 118 -21 -21 -0032 89285 $215.60 5933 ALDRICH AVENUE NORTH NANCY JOHNSON LOT 3, BLOCK 2 5933 ALDRICH AVENUE NORTH FRANK BURCH'S ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11786 01- 118 -21 -31 -0078 89545 $297.00 5518 DUPONT AVENUE NORTH HELEN SIMONSON LOT 11, BLOCK 1 5518 DUPONT AVENUE NORTH LITTELL ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11786 01- 118 -21 -42 -0034 89385 $127.00 520 56TH AVENUE NORTH ROGER SCHWARTZ LOT 37 520 56TH AVENUE NORTH GARCELON'S ADDITION TO MINNEAPOLIS BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11786 02- 118 -21 -14 -0040 89235 $256.00 5738 KNOX AVENUE NORTH JOHN MC ARDELL LOT 8 5738 KNOX AVENUE NORTH BERGSTROM'S ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11786 02- 118 -21 -41 -0004 89103 $175.00 5639 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH TERRY EARL CASE LOT 54 5639 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 218 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11786 02- 118 -21 -41 -0113 89580 $215.60 5540 KNOX AVENUE NORTH STEVEN M. GEMAR LOT 14, BLOCK 5 5540 KNOX AVENUE NORTH MEADOWLARK GARDENS BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11786 02- 118 -21 -44 -0025 89965 $297.00 5406 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH WM. & PAT TALMADGE LOT 9, BLOCK 2 5406 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH JOHN RYDEN ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11786 03- 118 -21 -11 -0067 89440 $145.00 5900 BEARD AVENUE NORTH ERIC MOONEN LOT 10, BLOCK 6 5900 BEARD AVENUE NORTH HIPPS 3RD ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11786 03- 118 -21 -21 -0085 89667 $155.00 6031 HALIFAX AVENUE NORTH JOSEPHINE CHAMBERLAIN LOT 5 6 6, BLOCK 9 6031 HALIFAX AVENUE NORTH PEARSON NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION BROOKLYN CETNER, MN 55429 11786 03- 118 -21 -43 -0091 89695 $231.00 5354 NORTHPORT DRIVE HENN CNTY DEPT OF TAX FORFEIT LANDS EASE SIDE OF TRACT G 603A GOVERNMENT CENTER REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 40 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55587 11786 10- 118 -21 -12 -0047 89540 $141.50 5160 DREW AVENUE NORTH JEFFREY ALLEN LOT 1, BLOCK 4 5160 DREW AVENUE NORTH LINDEN SHORES ON TWIN LAKE BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DISEASED TREE REMOVALS MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 3 YEAR LEVY PAGE 3 OF 3 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11786 10- 118 -21 -24 -0001 89010 $280.00 51ST /E. TWIN LAKE BLVD. TRI- STATE /SOO LINE COM AT THE INTERSEC OF NELY LINE OF SOO LINE BUILDING R R R/W AND THE S LINE OF N 1/2 OF MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 GOVT LOT 2 TH E ALONG SAID S LINE TO A PT DIS 1007 FT W FROM SE COR THEREOF TH N PAR WITH E LINE THEREO 11786 27- 119-21 -33 -0039 90040 $217.00 6933 MAJUOR AVENUE NORTH PATRICK S RENEE THOMAS LOT 3, BLOCK 3 6933 MAJOR AVENUE NORTH SUNSET MANOR ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11786 27- 119 -21 -43 -0078 89662 $152.00 3806 69TH AVENUE NORTH JAMES M. SORENSEN LOT 18, BLOCK 4 3806 69TH AVENUE NORTH PALMER LAKE TERRACE BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11786 28- 119 -21 -44 -0015 89605 $126.00 7055 PERRY AVENUE NORTH COLLEEN MULLEN LOT 1, BLOCK 1 7055 PERRY AVENUE NORTH MILLER'S WILLOW LANE 1ST ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER. MN 55429 11786 33- 119 -21 -41 -0131 89245 $231.00 6300 PERRY AVENUE NORTH GENE 6 LINDA LOFTUS PART OF LOT 19, BLOCK 3 6300 PERRY AVENUE NORTH BERGSTROM'S LYNSIDE MANOR ADDITION BROOKLYN CETNER, MN 55429 11786 34- 119 -21 -13 -0019 89265 $231.00 6607 DREW AVENUE NORTH A. COLLODORO /A. REKKEDAHL LOT 1, BLOCK 3 6607 DREW AVENUE NORTH BROOKLANE ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11786 34- 119 -21 -41 -0069 89393 $231.00 3313 POE ROAD EDWARD 6 BARB BARRON LOT 2, BLOCK 3 3313 POE ROAD GARDEN CITY 4TH ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11786 34- 119 -21- 44-0086 89392 $201.00 3313 62ND AVENUE NORTH TIMOTHY & JULIE ADAMS LOT 12, BLOCK 4 3313 62ND AVENUE NORTH GARDEN CITY 3RD ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11786 36- 119 -21 -12 -0037 89105 $204.60 507 69TH AVENUE NORTH OUTREACH GROUP HOMES LOT 29 1555 118TH LANE NW AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 310 COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 $4,129.30 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ---------------------- ------ ------ -------- - - - --- September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION - ------------ - ----- --------------- - Improvement Project No.: 1989 -03 6 1990 -13 Levy No.: 11787 Description: Cost of diseased shade tree removal to Fund /Code No.: 17/028 those tracts or parcels where trees were removed during 1989 or 1990, by written Levy Description: TREE REMOVAL 89 -5 agreement with the property owner or by order of the City Tree Inspector at a cost of greater than $300. Location: Various City Locations Levy runs five (5) years with interest at the rate of ten (10) percent. Improvement Hearing Date: N/A First payment, with property taxes payable in 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: N/A Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 by Resolution No.: N/A Adopted on: Assessment District: N/A by Resolution No.: Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Method of Apportionment: Direct cost, interest and administrative costs Cost Summary from Resolution No.: N/A TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: N/A Less Direct City Share: (Fund M.S.A.) Less Other Payments: TOTAL ASSESSED: $10,720.20 City Property: Other Public Property: Private Property: $10,720.20 0 0 0 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DISEASED TREE REMOVALS MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 5 YEAR LEVY PAGE 2 OF 3 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11787 01- 118 -21 -24 -0056 89405 $1,277.00 5700 DUPONT AVENUE NORTH DEAN L. PEARSON LOT 20 & 21 5700 DUPONT AVENUE NORTH GOULD'S RIVERVIEW ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11787 01- 118 -21 -31 -0059 89385 $717.00 5538 COLFAX AVENUE NORTH ROBERT M. LINDBLOM LOT 45 11429 65TH PLACE NORTH GARCELON'S ADDITION MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 11787 01- 118 -21 -31 -0061 89385 $911.00 5500 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH B. KRUGER /J. TRIVEDI LOT 46 5500 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH GARCELON'S ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11787 01- 118 -21 -32 -0023 89001 $501.60 5615 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH JEFF 5 LONA PORTER THAT PART OF 2 79 FT OF N 585 5615 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH 16/100 FT OF E 1/4 OF W 1/2 OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 LYING W OF E 30 FT THEREOF EX ALLEY EX ST 11787 01- 118 -21 -33 -0062 89365 $377.00 5405 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH JAMES 6 SUSAN BURNETTE LOTS 12 6 13, BLOCK 2 5405 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH FAIRHAVEN PARK BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11787 01- 118 -21 -34 -0119 89225 $425.00 5431 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH THOMAS TORGERSON LOT 3, BLOCK 3 5431 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH BELLVUE ACRES ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11787 02- 118 -21 -41 -0103 89580 $402.00 5533 JAMES AVENUE NORTH DAVID KENNEY /PENELOPE KENNEY -CHASE LOT 4, BLOCK 5 5533 JAMES AVENUE NORTH MEADOWLARK GADENS ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11787 03- 118 -21 -21 -0131 90090 $402.00 3819 61ST AVENUE NORTH SHEARSON - LEHMAN - HUTTON LOT 5, BLOCK 4 ATTN: ANN JOHNSTON WANGSTAD'S BROOKLYN TERRACE 1201 HIGHLAND AVENUE SUITE D SAN BERNADINO, CA 92404 11787 03- 118 -21 -24 -0059 89666 $647.00 3715 58TH AVENUE NORTH DONALD G. PETERSON LOT 3, BLOCK 1 3715 58TH AVENUE NORTH PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 2ND ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11787 10- 118 -21 -12 -0010 89540 $402.00 5206 DREW AVENUE NORTH DAN HOLIEN LOT 10 6 11, BLOCK 1 5206 DREW AVENUE NORTH LINDEN SHORES ON TWIN LAKE ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DISEASED TREE REMOVALS MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 5 YEAR LEVY PAGE 3 OF 3 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11787 26- 119 -21 -44 -0025 89404 $652.60 1807 70TH AVENUE NORTH CRAIG & BARBARA BENELL LOT 2, BLOCK 3 1807 70TH AVENUE NORTH GEORGE'S TERRACE 2ND ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11787 28- 119 -21 -41 -0205 00067 $877.00 7216 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD GREGORY LUTGEN LOT 2, BLOCK 1 7216 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD SHINGLE CREEK MANOR ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11787 33- 119 -21 -11 -0009 90015 $467.00 6836 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH ROBERT & PATRICIA SHAW LOT 1, BLOCK 1 6836 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH H. SMILDEN'S ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11787 34- 119 -21 -43 -0028 89525 $395.00 6207 CHOWEN AVENUE NORTH C. BREKKE /T. MARTIN LOT 1, BLOCK 2 6207 CHOWEN AVENUE NORTH LAWNRIDGE ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11787 34- 119 -21 -44 -0057 89392 $547.00 3319 MUMFORD ROAD DENNIS & BEVERLY BATTY LOT 17, BLOCK 3 3319 MUMFORD ROAD GARDEN CITY 3RD ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11787 35- 119-21 -11 -0034 01291 $487.00 1507 HUMBOLDT PLACE NORTH DEVRIES BUILDERS INC. LOT 9, BLOCK 1 7564 MARINER DRIVE ROSEMARY TERRACE ADDITION MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 11787 36- 119 -21 -31 -0023 89460 $425.00 6429 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH JOHN M. KOKESH LOT 4 6429 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH HOHENSTEIN'S ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11787 36- 119 -21 -34 -0059 89615 $406.00 6230 COLFAX AVENUE NORTH RUTH BEGGS LOT 14, BLOCK 2 6230 COLFAX AVENUE NORTH J. R. MURPHEY ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11787 36- 119 -21 -34 -0064 89615 $402.00 6233 COLFAX AVENUE NORTH MARIE MILES LOT 2, BLOCK 3 6233 COLFAX AVENUE NORTH J. R. MURPHEY ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 $10,720.20 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number 11,6 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY ACCOUNTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPjDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: j��°i�� No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) • On July 23, 1990 the City Council adopted resolution 90 -147 providing for public hearing regarding proposed assessments for delinquent public utility accounts. The purpose of this resolution is to certify special assessments for delinquent public utility accounts to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. These property owners have been notified on the delinquent status of their public utility account, in accordance with City ordinances. All property owners have been duly notified by certified mail of this special assessment hearing. Recommendation Following the public hearing, the City Council should consider adoption of the attached resolution which would certify the proposed special assessments for collection on the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. ll,bl Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY ACCOUNTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the records of the Public Utilities Department list certain accounts as delinquent as of August 1, 1990; and WHEREAS, the owner of the property served by each delinquent account has been notified of the delinquency according to legal requirements; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 and City Ordinances, Section 4 -105 authorize certification of such delinquent accounts to the County Tax Rolls for collection; and WHEREAS, an assessment roll, a copy of - which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk tabulating those properties where a delinquent public utility account is to be assessed with the amount, including interest and service charges, to be assessed; and WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to such proposed assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Said assessment roll of delinquent public utility accounts is hereby adopted and certified as Levy No. 11788. 2. The assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 1991, in one annual installment with interest thereon at ten (10) percent per annum, for a period of fifteen (15) months from October 1, 1990 through December 31, 1991. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. RESOLUTION N0. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION -- ----------- - - ---- --------------- - Improvement Project No.: N/A Levy No.: 11788 Description: Delinquent Public Utility Charges Fund /Code No.: 72/112 Levy Description: DELINQUENT PUB UTIL 90 Levy runs one (1) year with interest at the rate Location: Various Locations of ten (10) percent. Improvement Hearing Date: N/A First payment, with property taxes payable in 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: N/A Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 by Resolution No.: N/A Adopted on: Assessment District: N/A by Resolution No.: Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Method of Apportionment: Direct Costs Assessed Cost Summary from Resolution No.: N/A TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: N/A Less Direct City Share: (Fund M.S.A.) Less Other Payments: TOTAL ASSESSED: $666.24 City Property: Other Public Property: Private Property: $666.24 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DELINQUENT PUBLIC MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL UTILITY ACCOUNTS 90 PAGE OF PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11788 01- 118 -21 -32 -0047 89001 $62.27 5650 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH GEORGE DUNN Unplatted 01 118 21. That prt of 5650 Humboldt Avenue North the N 1 /10 of W 1/4 of NW 1/4 of Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 SW 1/4 lyg W of E 132 £t thereof ex st 11788 02- 118 -21 -23 -0019 89760 $244.46 2920 COUNTY RD 10 CAPITOL CITY INVESTMENTS Tract B ex rd RLS #1261 246 S. Albert Street St. Paul, MN 55105 11788 03- 118 -21 -12 -0071 89666 $300.25 5737 DREW AVENUE NORTH EUGENE & VELMA HAWKINS Lot 9 Block 2 PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 5737 Drew Avenue North 2ND ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11788 34- 119 -21 -24 -0009 89635 $59.26 6527 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD GARY & VICKI ZIMMERMAN Lot 2 Block 1 NORTHGATE ADDITON 22950 Woodbine St St. Francis, MN 55070 $666.24 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/ 10/90 Agenda Item Number L' REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING WEED DESTRUCTION CHARGES TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, DIRECTOR WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:;.t� `u:• No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) On July 23, 1990 the City Council adopted resolution 90 -147 providing for public hearing regarding proposed assessments for delinquent weed destruction accounts. The purpose of this resolution is to certify special assessments for delinquent weed destruction accounts to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. Delinquent weed destruction account property owners have received notice of delinquent account in accordance with the established collection policy and have not made payment. All property owners have been duly notified by certified mail of this special assessment hearing. Recommendation Following the public hearing, the City Council should consider adoption of the attached resolution which would certify the proposed special assessments for collection on the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. l�� f Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING WEED DESTRUCTION CHARGES TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the Weed Inspector of the City of Brooklyn Center has caused noxious weeds to be cut down on certain properties within the City under the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.271; and WHEREAS, the owners of record of such properties were notified in writing of the work done, and the costs and expenses involved, at least thirty days prior to September 10, 1990 in accordance with individual notice provisions of Subdivision 4 of Section 18.271; and WHEREAS, on August 1, 1990, there remained unpaid certain of these weed destruction accounts; and WHEREAS, assessment rolls for unpaid accounts from 1989, copies of which are attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, have been prepared by the City Clerk tabulating those properties where a delinquent weed destruction account is to be assessed with the amount to be assessed; and WHEREAS, said statute authorizes the certification of delinquent weed destruction accounts to the County tax rolls for collection; and WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for tree removal costs: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Said assessment rolls of delinquent weed destruction accounts are hereby adopted and certified as Levy No. 11789. 2. The assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 1991, in one annual installment with interest thereon at ten (10) percent per annum, for a period of fifteen months from October 1, 1990 through December 31, 1991. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the RESOLUTION N0, adoption on of this resolution; p tion; and he may, an time thereafter, Y Y , pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ----------------------------------------------- September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION -- ---- ------- - - - - -- --------------- - Improvement Project No.: N/A Levy No.: 11789 Description: Weed Removal Costs Fund /Code No.: 01/026 Levy Description: WEED DESTRUCTION 90 Levy runs one (1) year with interest at the rate Location: Various Locations of ten (10) percent. Improvement Hearing Date: N/A First payment, with property taxes payable in 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: N/A Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 by Resolution No.: N/A Adopted on: Assessment District: N/A by Resolution No.: Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Method of Apportionment: Direct Costs Assessed Cost Summary from Resolution No.: N/A TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: N/A Less Direct City Share: (Fund M.S.A.) Less Other Payments: TOTAL ASSESSED: $2,297.50 City Property: Other Public Property: Private Property: $2,297.50 0 ! ! CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WEED MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL DESTRUCTION 90 PAGE 2 OF 4 _ PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO., NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11789 01- 118 -21 -31 -0061 89385 $202.50 5500 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH BRUCE KRUGER JAGDISH TRIVIDI Lot 46, GARCELON'S ADDITION TO 5500 Bryant Avenue North 5500 Bryant Avenue North MINNEAPOLIS. That prt of the S 1/2 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 of Lot 46 lyg W of the E 200 ft thereof ex street 11789 01- 118 -21 -32 -0004 89001 $50.00 5625 DUPONT AVENUE NORTH HOMER L. CARROLL Unplatted 01 118 21. The E 1/2 of 5625 Dupont Avenue North the fol desc tract com at a pt on Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 E line of NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 dis 277 81/100 ft S from NE cor thereof th S 116 45/100 ft th W to W line of E 1/4 of NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 th N 116 6/10 ft th E to beg ex rd 11789 01- 118 -21 -32 -0047 89001 $50.00 5650 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH GEORGE J. DUNN Unplatted 01 118 21. That prt of 5650 Humboldt Avenue North the N 1 /10 of W 1/4 of NW 1/4 of Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 SW 1/4 lyg W of E 132 ft thereof ex street 11789 01- 118 -21 -33 -0100 89675 $85.00 5403 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH MICHELE GEYERMAN Block 2 Lots 14 & 15 N. & E. 5403 Emerson Avenue North PERKINS ADDITION TO MINNEAPOLIS Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11789 01- 118 -21 -33 -0147 89675 $100.00 5302 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH ROGER L. KLINGENSMITH Block 4 Lots 16 & 17 N. & E. 5302 Emerson Avenue North PERKINS ADDITION TO MINNEAPOLIS Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11789 01- 118 -21 -34 -0081 89225 $135.00 902 53RD AVENUE NORTH EQUIVEST INTERNATIONAL, INC. E 60 ft Lot 10 Block 4 BELLVUE 1018 Twelve Oaks Centre ACRES 15500 Wayzata Boulevard Wayzata, MN 55391 11789 01- 118 -21 -43 -0082 89225 $85.00 5350 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH MARKUS & NANCY SCHILLER N 1/2 Lot 15 Block 2 BELLVUE ACRES 5350 Camden Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11789, 02- 118 -21 -21 -0014 01091 $152.50 5939 JOHN MARTIN DRIVE SHERMAN- BOOSALIS INTERESTS Tract A RLS # 1529 1111 - 3rd Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55404 11789 02- 118 -21 -41 -0073 89580 $85.00 5619 KNOX AVENUE NORTH JILL MELEK Lot 6 Block 3 MEADOWLARK GARDENS 5619 Knox Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WEED MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL DESTRUCTION 90 PAGE 3 OF 4 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11789 10- 118 -21 -12 -0056 90016 $50.00 3305 - 53RD AVENUE NORTH BENNIE ROZMAN Lot 1 Block 1 TERRACE APARTMENTS 400 Dakota Avenue South ADDITION. That prt of Lot 1 lyg N Golden Valley, MN 55416 of a line running E par with N line of Sec 10 T118 R21 from a pt in W line of said Lot 1 dis 558 ft S from N line of said Sec 10 11789 10- 118 -21 -12 -0057 90016 $50.00 3413 - 53RD AVENUE NORTH BENNIE ROZMAN Lot 1 Block 1 TERRACE APARTMENTS 400 Dakota Avenue South ADDITION. That prt of Lot 1 lyg S Golden Valley, MN 55416 of a line running E par with N line of Sec 10 T118 R21 from a pt in W line of said Lot 1 dis 558 ft S from N line of said Sec 10 11789 25- 119 -21 -32 -0015 89104 $137.50 7205 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH KATHLEEN F. & RICHARD R. ADAMS Lot 46 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 309 7205 Fremont Avenue North S 90 ft of that prt of Lot 46 lyg Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 E of ZIESMER'S ADDITION 11789 25- 119 -21 -41 -0020 89639 $135.00 7109 WILLOW LANE NORTH MARION E. CARLSON Lot 4 Block 3 NORTH RIVER ESTATES 7109 Willow Lane North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11789 26- 119 -21 -44 -0079 90062 $152.50 1708 - 69TH AVENUE NORTH DAVE AND WENDY LONGEN Lot 2 Block 2 TISCH'S ADDITION 1708 - 69th Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 11789 35- 119 -21 -11 -0015 00257 $152.50 6637 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH ROBERT ZAPPA Tract A RLS # 1486 11420 - 53rd Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55442 11789 35- 119 -21 -32 -0094 89390 $85.00 2819 O'HENRY ROAD ADLY O'HALLEY 6 TAHA ABOUISNAINEH Lot 12 Block 7 GARDEN CITY 1ST 2819 O'Henry Road ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 11789 36- 119 -21 -13 -0031 89720 $117.50 RLS #0678. That prt of the S 98 MARVIN AND BETTY NELSON 2/10 ft of Tract D lyg W of E 29 104 Dorado Court ft thereof. Also that prt lyg N Plant City, FL 33566 of S 98 2/10 ft thereof ex parcel 3B as shown on MNDOT ROW plat No. 27 -20 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WEED MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL DESTRUCTION 90 PAGE 4 OF 4 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11789 36- 119 -21 -13 -0032 89720 $117.50 RLS #0678, Tract E MARVIN AND BETTY NELSON 104 Dorado Court Plant City, FL 33566 11789 36- 119 -21 -13 -0033 89720 $117.50 RLS #0678, Tract F MARVIN AND BETTY NELSON 104 Dorado Court Plant City, FL 33566 11789 36- 119 -21 -13 -0108 89374 $50.00 6525 WILLOW LANE NORTH IRWIN KETROSER Lot 1 Block 2 FARR'S 1ST ADDITION 5353 Gamble Drive Suite 110 Minneapolis, MN 55416 11789 36- 119 -21 -42 -0017 01417 $187.50 Lot 3 Block 1 LYNBROOK BOWL MARVIN AND BETTY NELSON ADDITION 104 Dorado Court Plant City, FL 33566 $2,297.50 it U FO AUG 31 1990 , ,� 1 ' �-�t ar^c� P� • �c�a.+ -t � Frejo& (qu. Ne�, ir 51 h�X'r u� usFec� pr��i �� vim+ -halj or uw�� V k^ad i &1 0 of S- 4 LA Iwe-' /Sw l*"!) aN SCi -- S 14aOlf �0ue �o all � I�� vte� o►� - tA C�'U4 4�1- i m e ri (n I V 6-Ant4j!-) re-.�e . rh� �«!-c_ w�l�� or a�!e �0 �= `�e' /" �i %2'� NlC�tl.�(� c1L�(� �tl�P� r S 7 f't �. HI � ��, D� t�f � IT �'� tivese e- re__& at 6f? re a�l"a/ house holel 1 m tc'we o CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number /d j REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING PUBLIC UTILITY HOOKUP CHARGES TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: i 5 SY KNAPP, bIRECTOR - OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW RECOMMENDATION:'' No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) On July 23, 1990 the City Council adopted resolution 90 -147 providing for public hearing regarding proposed assessments for public utility hookup charges. The purpose of this resolution is to certify special assessments for public utility hookup charges to the Hennepin P g n Count P y Tax Rolls. The owners of certain properties have executed an agreement to be assessed a water or sewer hookup charge in accordance with Cit y ordinances. All property owners have been duly notified by certified mail of this special assessment hearing. g Recommendation Following the public hearing, the City Council should consider adoption of the attached resolution which would certify the proposed special assessments for collection on the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING PUBLIC UTILITY HOOKUP CHARGES TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, certain properties which were not previously assessed a full share of the cost of the municipal water supply system or sanitary sewer system have been permitted to connect to such system; and i WHEREAS, the owner of each such property have executed an agreement to be assessed a hookup charge pursuant to City Ordinance Section 4 -201; and WHEREAS, an assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk tabulating those properties to be assessed for utilities over a ten year period, together with the amount to be assessed to each property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to such proposed assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Said assessment roll of water hookup charges are hereby adopted and certified as Levy No. 11806. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten years as indicated on the assessment roll. The first of the installments shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from October 1, 1990. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October 1, 1990 until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before RESOLUTION NO. November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ----------------------------------------------- September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION -- ----------- ------ --------------- - Improvement Project No.: N/A Levy No.: 11806 Description: Charges established for hookup to City Fund /Code No.: 72/113 utilities Levy Description: UTILITY HOOKUPS 90 Levy runs ten (10) years with interest at the rate Location: Various locations of ten (10) percent. Improvement Hearing Date: N/A First payment, with property taxes payable in 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: N/A Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 by Resolution No.: N/A Adopted on: Assessment District: N/A by Resolution No.: Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Method of Apportionment: Charges as established in Utility Hookup agreements Cost Summary from Resolution No.: N/A TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: N/A Less Direct City Share: (Fund M.S.A.) Less Other Payments: TOTAL ASSESSED: $12,713.46 City Property: Other Public Property: Private Property: $12,713.46 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER UTILITY MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL HOOKUPS 90 PAGE 2 OF 2 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11806 01- 118 -21 -33 -0037 89365 $2,200.00 5415 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH WHITELY ENTERPRISES LOT 8, BLOCK 1 FAIRHAVEN PARK 5401 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11806 35- 119 -21 -41 -0016 04160 $10,513.46 BLOCK 2, LOT 2, RICHARDSON PARK SHINGLE CREEK LAND COMPANY C/O WINFIELD DEVELOPMENTS 5776 LINCOLN DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 $12,713.46 i it CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number C / REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -08 TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP,,,DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) • On July 23, 1990 the City Council adopted resolution no. 90 -140 providing for public hearing regarding proposed assessments for alley improvement project 1989 -08. This project installed storm sewer and concrete paving in the alley between Fremont and Girard Avenues, from 55th to 57th Avenues North. The proposed special assessments were made in accordance with the City's alley improvement policy and with the methodology discussed at the public hearing establishing the project. All property owners have been duly notified by certified mail of this special assessment hearing. Recommendation Following the public hearing, the City Council should consider adoption of the attached resolution, which would certify the proposed special assessments for collection on the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -08 FREMONT /GIRARD - 55TH TO 57TH PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (FINAL) $ 97,853.99 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $ 62,596.86 OTHER FUNDS $ 35,257.13 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PER BUILDABLE SITE AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL DIRECT ACCESS $ 3,215.33 $ 3,016.13 INDIRECT ACCESS $ 989.33 $ 827.00 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TWENTY (20) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -08 TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed Special Assessment Levy No. 11790 for the following improvement: ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -08 FREMONT /GIRARD, 55TH TO 57TH AVENUES NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Such proposed Special Assessment Levy 11790, made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute he s y p to t pedal assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. i 2. The assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of twenty (20) years as indicated on the assessment roll. The first of the installments shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from October 1, 1990. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October 1, 1990 until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment, when due, shall be added interest for one year on all paid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. RESOLUTION N0, 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ------------------------------------------------ September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION -------- ----- - - - - -- --------------- - Improvement Project No.: 1989 -08 Levy No.: 11790 Description: Alley Paving Fund /Code No.: 59/024 Levy Description: ALLEY (89 -08) 90 Location: Between Fremont and Girard Avenues Levy runs twenty (20) years with interest at the rate From 55th to 57th Avenues North of ten (10) percent. Improvement Hearing Date: June 26, 1989 First payment, with property taxes payable in 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: June 26, 1989 Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 by Resolution No.: 89 -127 Adopted on: Assessment District: Direct: Access from alley Indirect: Access from street by Resolution No.: Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Method of Apportionment: Direct: $3,016.13 /parcel Indirect: $827.00 /parcel Plus cost of upgrading to concrete driveway apron, where applicable Cost Summary from Resolution No.: 90 -118 TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: $97,853.99 Less Direct City Share: $35,257.13 (Fund M.S.A.) Less Other Payments: TOTAL ASSESSED: $62,596.86 City Property: Other Public Property: Private Property: $62,596.86 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL ALLEY (89 -08) 90 PAGE 2 OF 5 FOR INFORMATION ONLY PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL ALLEY APRON Address Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL PAVING PAVING Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0019 89001 $827.00 $827.00 5655 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH JAMES & SUE GUNDERSEN S 81 16/100 FT OF N 111 16/100 FT 5655 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH OF THAT PART OF THE E /14 OF W 1/2 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 LYING W OF E 30 FT THEREOF EX ALLEY AND ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0020 89001 $827.00 $827.00 5651 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH STELLA CHRISTENSEN S 79 FT OF N 190 16/100 FT OF THAT 5651 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH PART OF THE E 1/4 OF W 1/2 OF NW BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1/4 OF SW 1/4 LYING W OF E 30 FT THEREOF EX ALLEY AND ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0021 89001 $3,093.63 $3,016.13 $77.50 5645 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH JUDITH L. NYHOLM S 87 FT OF N 435 16/100 FT OF 5645 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH E 1/4 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 EX ALLEY AND ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0022 89001 $3,016.13 $3,016.13 5625 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH LAWRENCE R. STANCHFIELD S 71 FT OF N 506 16/100 FT OF 5625 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH E 1/4 OF W 1/2 OF NW 114 OF SW 1/4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 EX ALLEY AND ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0023 89001 $827.00 $827.00 5615 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH JEFF S LONA PORTER THAT PART OF S 79 FT OF N 585 16/100 5615 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH FT OF E 1/4 OF W 112 OF NW 1/4 OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 SW 1/4 LYING W OF E 30 FT THEREOF EX ALLEY EX ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0024 89001 $827.00 $827.00 5611 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH JOSEPH J. CROAL S 79 FT OF N 664 16/100 FT OF THAT 5611 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH PART OF THE E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 OF SW 1/4 LYING E OF ALLEY EX ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0025 89001 $3,016.13 $3,016.13 5605 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH WM. J. VAUGHN THE S 79 FT OF THE N 743 161100 FT 5605 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH OF THAT PART OF THE E 1/2 OF W 1/2 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 LYING E OF ALLEY EX ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0026 89001 $827.00 $827.00 5543 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH H. A. SCOFIELD COM AT A PT IN E LINE OF W 1/2 OF 5543 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 DIS 462 22/100 FT N BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 FROM SE COR THEREOF TH W 158 47/100 FT TO A PT 462 52/100 FT N FROM THE S LINE THEREOF TH N TO A PT 743 16/100 FT S FROM N LINE THEREOF TH E TO E LINE THEREOF TH S TO BEG EX ST CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL ALLEY (89 -08) 90 PAGE 3 OF 5 FOR INFORMATION ONLY PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL ALLEY APRON Address Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL PAVING PAVING Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0027 89001 $3,016.13 $3,016.13 5527 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH PHILIP E. NYBERG COM AT A PT IN THE E LINE OF W 1/2 5527 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 DIST 372 FT N BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 FROM THE SE COR THEREOF TH W 158 4/10 FT TH N 90 52/100 FT TH E 158 47/100 FT TO E LINE THEREOF TH S 90 22/100 FT TO BEG EX ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0028 89001 $827.00 $827.00 5521 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH HARRY L. LINDQUIST N 108 FT OF S 372 FT OF E 1/4 OF 5521 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 EX ALLEY BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 AND EX ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0029 89001 $3,016.13 $3,016.13 5515 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH STEPHEN R. & JOAN E. SCHONNING N 68 FT OF S 264 FT OF W 128 37/100 5515 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH FT OF E 158 37/100 FT OF W 1/2 OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 EX ST I 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0030 89001 $827.00 $827.00 1300 55TH AVENUE NORTH MARK SCHWEITZER /CONSTANCE BESAW S 196 FT OF W 128 37/100 FT OF E 158 1300 55TH AVENUE NORTH 37/100 FT OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SW BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1/4 EX ROAD 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0031 89001 $3,016.13 $3,016.13 5504 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH DONNA M. JARL COM AT A PT 33 FT N FROM THE SW COR 5504 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 TH N 103 64/100 FT TH E 158 41/100 FT TH S TO A PT 158 391100 FT E FROM BEG TH W TO BEG EX ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0032 89001 $3,188.33 $3,016.13 $172.20 5520 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH HENRY J. KLOSTER COM AT A PT 136 64/100 FT N FROM THE 5520 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH SW COR OF THE E 1/2 OF W 112 OFO NW BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1/4 OF SW 1/4 TH E 158 41/100 FT TH N 75 FT TH W 158 431100 FT TH S 75 FT TO BEG EX ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0033 89001 $3,016.13 $3,016.13 5524 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH AARON 6 CAROL SMITH COM AT A PT 211 64/100 FT N FROM SW 5524 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH COR OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF BROOOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 SW 1/4 TH N 75 FT TH E 158 45/100 FT TO W LINE OF ALLEY TH S ALONG ALLEY LINE 75 FT TH W 158 43/100 FT TO BEG EX ST CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL ALLEY (89 -08) 90 PAGE 4 OF 5 FOR INFORMATION ONLY PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL ALLEY APRON Address Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL PAVING PAVING Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0034 89001 $827.00 $827.00 5530 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH MARSHALL E. THOMPSON COM AT A PT 286 64/100 FT N FROM THE 5530 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH SW COR OF E 112 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 OF SW 114 TH N 75 FT TH E 158 47/100 FT TH S 75 FT TH W TO BEG EX ST 11790 01- 118-21 -32 -0035 89001 $827.00 $827.00 5538 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH GREGORY W. & GALE D. MICKA COM AT A PT 361 64/100 FT N FROM THE 5538 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH SW COR OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 SW 1/4 TH N 75 FT TH E 158 491100 FT TH S 75 FT TH W 158 47/100 FT TO BEG EX ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0036 89001 $3,110.85 $3,016.13 $94.72 5546 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH PATRICK W. & CYNTHIA A. BURKE COM AT A PT 436 64/100 FT N FROM SW 5546 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH COR OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 SW 1/4 TH N 75 FT TH E 158 51 /100 FT TH S 75 FT TH W 158 49/100 FT TO BEG EX ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0037 89001 $827.00 $827.00 5548 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH JOHN & BARBARA KALLIGHER COM AT A PT 511 641100 FT N FROM SW 5548 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH COR OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 SW 114 TH N TO A PT 743 1 /10 FT S FROM NW COR THEREOF TH E TO W LINE OF ALLEY TH S ALONG SAID ALLEY LINE TO A PT DUE E FROM BEG TH W TO BEG EX ST 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0038 89001 $3,016.13 $3,016.13 5550 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH THOMAS M. RYAN S 79 FT OF N 743 16/100 FT OF W 1/2 5550 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 EX ST AND ALLEY 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0039 89001 $3,016.13 $3,016.13 5600 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH JOSEPH & ESTHER VALENTA, JR. S 79 FT OF N 664 16/100 FT OF W 1/2 5600 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 EX ST AND ALLEY 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0040 89001 $827.00 $827.00 5620 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH LOUIS F. LARSON S 75 FT OF N 585 16/100 FT OF W 1/2 5620 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 114 OF SW 1/4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 EX ST AND ALLEY 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0041 89001 $827.00 $827.00 5630 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH STEVEN & KATHLEEN SMITH S 83 FT OF N 510 16/100 FT OF W 1/2 5630 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 EX STREET AND ALLEY CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL ALLEY (89 -08) 90 PAGE 5 OF 5 FOR INFORMATION ONLY PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL ALLEY APRON Address Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL PAVING PAVING Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0042 89001 $3,143.54 $3,016.13 $127.41 5636 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH STEPHEN & DEBORAH TOBAKO S 72 FT 3/10 FT OF N 427 16/100 FT OF 5636 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH W 1/2 OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 OF SW 1/4 EX ST AND ALLEY 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0043 89001 $827.00 $827.00 5646 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH DARYL & PATRICIA GRAVES S 85 7/10 OF N 354 86/100 FT OF 5646 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH W 1/2 OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 OF SW 1/4 EX ST AND ALLEY 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0044 89001 $3,016.13 $3,016.13 5652 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH DEE K. MANTZ S 79 FT OF N 269 16/100 FT OF W 1/2 5652 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH OF E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 EX ST AND ALLEY 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0121 03310 $3,115.95 $3,016.13 $99.82 1313 57TH AVENUE NORTH COURTNEY 5 JULIE SMITH LOT 1, BLOCK 1 1313 57TH AVENUE NORTH D.L. LARSON ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0122 03310 $3,016.13 $3,016.13 5658 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH JOHN S JEANNE GUNDERSEN LOT 2, BLOCK 1 5658 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH D. L. LARSON ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0072 89263 $3,016.13 $3,016.13 5649 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH SUSAN HILLSDALE LOT 1, BLOCK 1 5819 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH BRANDVOLD WOODS ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 � 11790 01- 118 -21 -32 -0073 89263 $3,016.13 $3,016.13 5647 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH GORDON 6 DOROTHY JOHNSON, SR. LOT 2, BLOCK 1 5647 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH BRANDVOLD WOODS ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 $62,596.86 $62,025.21 $571.65 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9 /1 /90 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION AMENDING ONE ASSESSMENT ON PROPOSED LEVY #11791 DEPT. APPROVAL- SY KNAPP, DRECT6R OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached The proposed levy roll for alley improvement project 1989 -15 included a $1,875.03 assessment for the property at 5422 Humboldt Avenue North. This assessment is at the "Direct Access" ess rate. It was determined during project construction that this property has "Indirect Access ". The amount shown on the levy roll is in error, and should have been at that "indirect access" rate of $640.25. Council Action Required A resolution amending this assessment is provided. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING ONE ASSESSENT ON PROPOSED LEVY #11791 WHEREAS, the proposed special assessment levy roll for proposed levy #11791 included an assessment of $1,875.03 on PID #01- 118 -21 -33 -0066; and WHEREAS, this assessment is at the "Direct Access" rate, and it has been determined that said assessment should have been made at the "Indirect Access" rate. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the proposed special assessment on PID #01- 118 -21 -33 -0066 is hereby amended from $1,875.03 to $640.25. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number — YZzE,;� — REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR DEFERMENT OF PORTIONS OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PROPOSED LEVY #11791 DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, DACCTOR Of ISUMIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached City Council Resolution No. 78 -87 established City policy for deferral of • special assessments by certain senior citizens, and Resolution No. 85 -143 extended that provision to persons retired due to permanent and total disability. Three persons have applied for and are eligible for deferment of a portion of their special assessments for alley improvement project 1989 -15. Percy M. Sommers, 5421 Girard Avenue North, is proposed to be assessed $1,875.03. He is eligible to defer $716.63. If the deferment is approved, the reduced assessment would be $1,158.40. Mrs. Ardelle Barker, 5415 Girard Avenue North, is proposed to be assessed $1,959.51. She is eligible to defer $1,109.80. If the deferment is approved, the reduced assessment would be $849.71. Douglas P. Cincotta, 5446 Humboldt Avenue North, is a disabled person who works part time in sheltered employment. Because he is prone to convulsions, his employment options are limited. He is proposed to be assessed $1,875.03, and is eligible to defer $782.12. If the deferment is approved, the reduced assessment would be $1,092.91. Council Action Required A resolution approving the deferments and amending the proposed special assessment levy roll is provided. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR DEFERMENT OF PORTIONS OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PROPOSED LEVY #11791 WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 78 -87 provided for the deferment of special assessments by senior citizens, and Resolution No. 85 -143 extended that provision to persons retired due to permanent and total disability; and WHEREAS, the Council has received and considered applications from certain persons for deferment of special assessments; and WHEREAS, the Council has found that certain persons are eligible for deferment of a portion of their proposed special assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The deferral of $716.63 of the proposed $1,875.03 assessment on PID #01- 118 -21 -33 -0055 is hereby approved, and the assessment is amended to $1,158.40. 2. The deferral of $1,109.80 of the proposed $1,959.51 assessment on 0 PID #01- 118 -21 -33 -0058 and PID #01- 118 -21 -33 -0059 is hereby approved, and the assessment is amended to $849.71. 3. The deferral of $782.12 of the proposed $1,875.03 assessment on PID #01- 118 -21 -33 -0070 is hereby approved, and the assessment is amended to $1,092.91. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9 10 90 Agenda Item Number 11, REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -15 TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP,::DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) On July 11, 1990 the City Council adopted resolution no. 90 -141 providing for public hearing regarding proposed assessments for alley improvement project 1989 -15. This project installed storm sewer and concrete paving in the alley between Girard and Humboldt Avenues, from 54th to 55th Avenues North. The proposed special assessments were made in accordance with the City's alley improvement policy and with the methodology discussed at the public hearing establishing the project. All property owners have been duly notified by certified mail of this special assessment hearing. Recommendation Following the public hearing, the City Council should consider adoption of the attached resolution, which would certify the proposed special assessments for collection on the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. a ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -15 GIRARD /HUMBOLDT - 54TH TO 55TH PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (FINAL) $ 38,136.04 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $ 29,308.02 OTHER FUNDS $ 8,828.02 • PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PER BUILDABLE SITE AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL DIRECT ACCESS $ 1,953.78 $ 1,875.03 INDIRECT ACCESS $ 697.78 $ 640.25 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TWENTY (20) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -15 TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed Special Assessment Levy No. 11791 for the following improvement: ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -15 GIRARD /HUMBOLDT, 54TH TO 55TH AVENUES NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Such proposed Special Assessment Levy 11791, made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of twenty (20) years as indicated on the assessment roll. The first of the installments shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from October 1, 1990. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October 1, 1990 until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment, when due, shall be added interest for one year on all paid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. RESOLUTION NO. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ------------------------------------------------ September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION ----- -------- - -- - -- --------------- - Improvement Project No.: 1989 -15 Levy No.: 11791 Description: Alley Paving Fund /Code No.: 59/025 Levy Description: ALLEY (89 -15) 90 Location: Between Girard and Humboldt Avenues Levy runs twenty (20) years with interest at the rate From 54th to 55th of ten (10) percent. Improvement Hearing Date: June 26, 1989 First payment, with property taxes payable in 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: June 26, 1989 Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 by Resolution No.: 89 -128 Adopted on: Assessment District: Direct: Access from alley Indirect: Access from street by Resolution No.: Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Method of Apportionment: Direct: $1,705.03 /parcel Indirect: $937.52 /parcel Plus cost of upgrading to concrete driveway apron, where applicable Cost Summary from Resolution No.: 90 -118 TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: $38,136.04 Less Direct City Share: $ 8,828.02 (Fund M.S.A.) Less Other Payments: TOTAL ASSESSED: $29,308.02 City Property: Other Public Property: Private Property: $29,308.02 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL ALLEY (89 -15) 90 PAGE 1 OF 3 IFOR INFORMATION ONLY PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER I I LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I ALLEY I APRON I Address ( Name I NO. i N0. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I PAVING I PAVING I Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address 1 1 111791 1 101- 118-21-33 -0054 1 89365 1 $1,875.03 1 $1,875.03 1 -- 15453 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH IDEAN & BARBARA JACOBS I i I I I I I I ILOT 1& 2, BLOCK 2 15453 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH 1 ( I I 1 1 I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I i I I I I 1 1 I 111791 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0055 1 89365 1 $1,875.03 1 $1,875.03 1 - 15421 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH IPERCY M. SOMMERS 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 3, BLOCK 2 15421 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I I I I I 111791 1 101- 118 -21- 33-0056 1 89365 1 $1,875.03 1 $1,875.03 1 -- 15419 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH (RICHARD F. YOUNGBERG I I 1 1 1 I 1 I ILOT 4 AND PART OF LOT 5, BLOCK 2 15419 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH I I I 1 I ( I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 111791 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0057 1 89365 1 $1,913.30 1 $1,875.03 1 $38.28 15417 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH (CLIFFORD & RENEE KUYKENDALL I 1 I I 1 1 I I (PART OF LOT 5, LOT 6, BLOCK 2 15417 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH 1 1 I 1 1 1 ( I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I I I I I 111791 1 101 -118- 21-33 -0058 1 89365 1 $1,021.99 1 $937.52 1 $84.47 15415 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH IMRS. HUBERT BARKER I I I I I I I I (LOT 7, BLOCK 2 15415 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I I I I I 111791 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0059 1 89365 1 $937.52 1 $937.52 1 -- 15415 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH IARDELLE BARKER I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I ILOT 8, BLOCK 2 15415 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH I I 1 1 1 1 1 I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I I I I I 111791 1 101-118 -21 -33 -0060 1 89365 1 $1,930.98 1 $1,875.03 1 $55.95 15413 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH ICHARLES D. BLOOM I I I I I I I I ILOT 9, BLOCK 2 15413 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I I I I I 111791 1 101- 118- 21-33-0061 1 89365 1 $1,875.03 1 $1,875.03 1 -- 15409 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH IGEORGINE HAMPTON I i 1 1 1 I 1 I ILOT 10 & 11, BLOCK 2 15409 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH I I 1 1 1 1 I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 0 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL ALLEY (89 -15) 90 PAGE Z OF 3 IFOR INFORMATION ONLY PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER I LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I ALLEY I APRON I Address 1 Name 1 I NO. I NO. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I PAVING I PAVING I Addition /Legal Description 1 Mailing Address 1 1-1-1 I I 1-1-1 I I 111791 1 101-118-21-33 -0062 1 89365 1 $640.25 1 $640.25 1 -- 15405 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH (JAMES & SUSAN BURNETTE 1 I I i I I I I ILOT 12 & 13, BLOCK 2 15405 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH 1 1 I I 1 ( I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 111791 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0063 1 89365 1 $640.25 1 $640.25 1 -- 15401 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH (DONALD E. NELSON 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 14 & 15, BLOCK 2 15401 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I 1 1 I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I I I I I 111791 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0064 1 89365 1 $640.25 1 $640.25 1 - 15400 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH ISTELLA R. PIELES 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 16 & 17, BLOCK 2 15400 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 111791 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0065 1 89365 1 $1,875.03 1 $1,875.03 1 -- 15408 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH (MICHAEL & CHERYL HETRICK 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 18 & 19, BLOCK 2 15408 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 111791 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0066 1 89365 1 $1,875.03 1 $1,875.03 1 -- 15422 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH (CHARLES E. DIBBLE, JR. 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 20 & 21, BLOCK 2 15422 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 111791 1 101 - 118 -21 -33 -0067 1 89365 1 $1,952.22 1 $1,875.03 1 $77.19 15430 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH ILILLIAN CHRISTIAN 1 I I i I I I I ILOT 22 & 23, BLOCK 2 15430 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1 I I 1 1 1 I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 111791 1 101-118- 21-33 -0068 1 89365 1 $2,077.15 1 $1,875.03 1 $202.12 15440 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH (PAUL J. ROSCH I I I I I I I ILOT 25, BLOCK 2 15440 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 111791 1 101-118 -21- 33-0069 1 89365 1 $1,875.03 1 $1,875.03 1 -- 15444 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH (BRIAN & SALLY SWANSON I I I I I I I I ILOT 26, BLOCK 2 15444 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL ALLEY (89 -15) 90 PAGE 3 OF 3 IFOR INFORMATION ONLY PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER I LEVY IPROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I ALLEY I APRON I Address I Name 1 I NO. I NO. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I PAVING I PAVING I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address I 1-1-1 I l 1-1-1 I I 111791 I 101-118-21 -33 -0070 1 89365 I $1,875.03 1 $1,875.03 1 -- 15446 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH (DOUGLAS P. CINCOTTA 1 1 1 1 I ( I 1 ILOT 27, BLOCK 2 15446 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1 1 ( 1 1 I I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 111791 1 101-118 -21 -33 -0071 1 89365 1 $1,875.03 1 $1,875.03 1 -- 15448 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH IFRANCIS & LORRI KAAS 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 28, BLOCK 2 15448 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I 111791 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0072 1 89365 1 $678.84 1 $640.25 1 $38.59 11425 55TH AVENUE NORTH IRAYMOND N. JANSSEN 1 1 I I I I I I ILOT 29 & 30, BLOCK 2 11619 25TH AVENUE NORTH 1 I 1 I I I I I IFAIRHAVEN PARK ADDITION IMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55411 I L 1-1-1 I I $29,308.02 $28,811.43 $496.60 ill CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9-1 0 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR DEFERMENT OF A PORTION OF ONE ASSESSMENT ON PROPOSED LEVY #11792 DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, DIRECTOR 6F , UC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached City Council Resolution No. 78 -87 established City policy for deferral of special assessments by certain senior citizens, and Resolution No. 85 -143 extended that • provision to persons retired due to permanent and total disability. Katherine Grimmer, 5322 Fremont Avenue North, has applied for and is eligible to defer a portion of the special assessment for alley improvement project 1989 -16. The proposed assessment on Ms. Grimmer's property is $1,302.54; she is eligible, according to established policy, to defer $148.08 of that principle. If the deferment is approved, the reduced assessment would be $1,154.46. Council Action Required A resolution approving the deferment and amending the proposed special assessment levy roll is provided. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: . RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR DEFERMENT OF PORTIONS OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PROPOSED LEVY #11792 WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 78 -87 provided for the deferment of special assessments by senior citizens, and Resolution No. 85 -143 extended that provision to persons retired due to permanent and total disability; and WHEREAS, the Council has received and considered application for deferment of special assessments; and WHEREAS, the Council has found that the applicant is eligible for deferment of a portion of her proposed special assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the deferral of $148.08 of the proposed $1,302.54 assessment on PID #01- 118 -21 -33 -0127 is hereby approved, and the assessment is amended to $1,154.46. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/9 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -16 TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW RECOMMENDATION: irr 17 No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) On July 23, 1990 the City Council adopted resolution no. 90 -142 providing for public hearing regarding proposed assessments for alley improvement project 1989 -16. This project installed storm sewer and concrete paving in the alley between Emerson and Fremont Avenues, from 53rd to 54th Avenues North. The proposed special assessments were made in accordance with the City's alley improvement policy and with the methodology discussed at the public hearing establishing the project. All property owners have been duly notified by certified mail of this special assessment hearing. Recommendation Following the public hearing, the City Council should consider adoption of the attached resolution, which would certify the proposed special assessments for collection on the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. • ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -16 • EMERSON /FREMONT /- 53RD TO 54TH PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (FINAL) $ 39,487.49 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $ 26,150.62 OTHER FUNDS $ 13,336.87 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PER BUILDABLE SITE AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL DIRECT ACCESS $ 1,176.84 $ 1,176.84 INDIRECT ACCESS $ 430.00 $ 430.00 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TWENTY (20) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT • 1� Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -16 TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed Special Assessment Levy No. 11792 for the following improvement: ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -16 EMERSON /FREMONT, 53RD TO 54TH AVENUES NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Such proposed Special Assessment Levy 11792, made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of twenty (20) years as indicated on the assessment roll. The first of the installments shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from October 1, 1990. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October 1, 1990 until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment, when due, shall be added interest for one year on all paid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. RESOLUTION NO. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ------------------------------------------------ September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION ------- ------ - - - - -- --------------- - Improvement Project No.: 1989 -16 Levy No.: 11792 Description: Alley Paving Fund /Code No.: 59/026 Levy Description: ALLEY (89 -16) 90 Location: Between Emerson and Fremont Avenues Levy runs twenty (20) years with interest at the rate From 53rd to 54th Avenues North of ten (10) percent. Improvement Hearing Date: June 26, 1989 First payment, with property taxes payable in 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: June 26, 1989 Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 by Resolution No.: 89 -129 Adopted on: Assessment District: Direct: Access from alley Indirect: Access from street by Resolution No.: Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Method of Apportionment: Direct: $1,176.84 /parcel Indirect: $430.00 /parcel Plus cost of upgrading to concrete driveway apron, where applicable Cost Summary from Resolution No.: 90-118 TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: $39,487.49 Less Direct City Share: $13,336.87 (Fund M.S.A.) Less Other Payments: TOTAL ASSESSED: $26,150.62 City Property: Other Public Property: Private Property: $26,150.62 0 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL ALLEY (89-16) 90 PAGE 1 OF 3 I 1 FOR INFORMATION ONLY 1 PROPERTY ASSESSED I OWNER 1 I LEVY IPROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I ALLEY I APRON I Address 1 Name 1 I NO. I NO. (IDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I PAVING I PAVING I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address 1 1-1-1 I L 1-1-1 I I I I I l I I I { I 1 111792 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0110 1 89675 1 $1,271.54 1 $1,176.84 1 $94.70 15357 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH IMARGARETE ROSENOW 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 1, BLOCK 3 15357 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 111792 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0111 1 89675 1 $1,254.34 1 $1,176.84 1 $77.50 15355 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH IJAMES J. BREZINSKI I I I I I I I I ILOT 2, BLOCK 3 15355 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111792 1 101- 118-21 -33 -0112 1 89675 1 $1,285.34 1 $1,176.84 1 $108.50 15351 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH JDAVID L. VANORSOW 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 3& 112 OF LOT 4, BLOCK 3 15351 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 111792 1 101- 118-21- 33-0113 1 89675 1 $1,287.04 1 $1,176.84 1 $110.20 15343 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH (MILTON J. HAMANN I I I I 1 I I I 1112 OF LOT 4& LOT 5, BLOCK 3 15343 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH I i I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 f f i l I I I 1 1 I 111792 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0114 1 89675 1 $1,300.84 1 $1,176.84 1 $124.00 15339 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH IMARY LODAHL 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 6, BLOCK 3 15339 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 111792 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0118 1 89675 1 $1,176.84 1 $1,176.84 1 -- 15313 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH IFRANCES E. INGLE I I I I I I I I ILOT 9, BLOCK 3 15313 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111792 1 101-118 -21 -33 -0119 1 89675 1 $1,176.84 1 $1,176.84 1 - 15311 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH IMANFRED C. BERGSTROM 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 10, BLOCK 3 15311 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I I I I I 111792 1 101-118-21-33 -0120 1 89675 1 $1,263.02 1 $1,176.84 1 $86.18 15309 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH IANTON E. PFILIPSEN 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 11, BLOCK 3 15309 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH 1 I I { 1 I 1 IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I I 1 1 I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL ALLEY (89 -16) 90 PAGE 2 OF 3 FOR INFORMATION ONLY PROPERTY ASSESSED I OWNER 1 I LEVY IPROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I ALLEY I APRON Address Name I NO. I NO. (IDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I PAVING I PAVING I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address 1 1-1-1 I L 1-1-1 I I 111792 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0121 1 89675 1 $1,283.63 1 $1,176.84 1 $106.79 15307 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH ILOUIS P. KOEGL I I I I I I I I ILOT 12, BLOCK 3 15307 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 111792 1 101- 118 -21- 33-0122 1 89675 1 $1,176.84 1 $1,176.84 1 -- 15305 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH IROBERT J. KOSKINEN 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 13, BLOCK 3 15305 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH I I ( I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 111792 1 101-118 -21 -33 -0123 1 89675 1 $1,314.63 1 $1,176.84 1 $137.79 15303 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH IJAMES & YVONNE K. LYONS 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 14, BLOCK 3 15303 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 111792 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0124 1 89675 1 $430.00 1 $430.00 1 15301 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH ISCOTT & MARGARET THORNTON I I I I I I I (LOT 15, BLOCK 3 15301 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111792 1 101- 118-21-33 -0125 1 89675 1 $430.00 1 $430.00 1 -- 15302 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH IPATRICK MENTH 1 I I I I I I I ILOT 16 & 17, BLOCK 3 119830 POLK ST. N.W. 1 I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION (ELK RIVER, MN 55330 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111792 1 101-118 -21 -33 -0126 1 89675 1 $1,267.05 1 $1,176.84 1 $90.21 15312 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH (GLORIA HANRATTY 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 ILOT 17 & 18, BLOCK 3 15312 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I 1 I 1 IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I I I I I 111792 1 101- 118 - 21-33 -0127 1 89675 1 $1,302.54 1 $1,176.84 1 $125.70 15322 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH IKATHERINE GRIMMER I I 1 I I I 1 ILOT 19 & 1/2 OF 20, BLOCK 3 15322 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I 111792 1 101- 118 - 21-33 -0128 1 89675 1 $445.24 1 $388.36 1 $56.88 15326 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH ITERRENCE V. BUZZARD 1 I I I I I 1 1 1112 OF LOT 20, BLOCK 3 15326 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL ALLEY (89 -16) 90 PAGE 3 OF 3 1 FOR INFORMATION ONLY I PROPERTY ASSESSED 1 OWNER 1 LEVY IPROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I ALLEY I APRON Address Name 1 I NO. I NO. (IDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I PAVING I PAVING I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address I 1-1-1 I I 1-1-1 I I 111792 I 101-118- 21-33 -0129 1 89675 1 $788.48 1 $788.48 1 -- 15326 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH ITERRENCE V. BUZZARD 1 I I 1 I 1 I ILOT 21, BLOCK 3 15326 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH I I I I I ( 1 I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I 1 1 I 111792 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0130 1 89675 1 $1,176.84 1 $1,176.84 i -- 15330 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH ISIGMUND WROBEL I I I I I I I I ILOT 22 & 112 OF 23, BLOCK 3 15330 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I ( I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 i 111792 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0131 1 89675 1 $430.00 1 $430.00 1 -- 15334 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH IHARVEY W. STEVENS 1 I I I I I I 1 ILOT 23, 24, 25, BLOCK 3 15334 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I 111792 1 101 118 - 21 - 33-0132 1 89675 1 $1,176.84 1 $1,176.84 I -- 15340 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH IRAYMOND A. RARICK 1 I I I I ( I I ILOT 25 & 26, BLOCK 3 15340 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I 111792 1 101- 118 -21- 33-0133 1 89675 1 $1,176.84 1 $1,176.84 1 -- 15344 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH IFLORENCE HELGREN 1 I I I I I I ( ( LOT 27, BLOCK 3 15344 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 111792 1 101 118 - 21-33 -0134 1 89675 1 $1,292.62 1 $1,176.84 1 $115.78 11215 -17 54TH AVENUE NORTH IRICHARD T. & KIMBERLY K. STALLMAN 1 I I I I ILOT 28, 29, 30, BLOCK 3 11215-17 54TH AVENUE NORTH 1 1 I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I I I I 1 111792 1 101-118- 21-33 -0135 1 89675 1 $1,266.43 1 $1,176.84 1 $89.59 11209 54TH AVENUE NORTH IIRMA GILCHRIST 1 1 1 1 I I I i ILOT 29 & 30, BLOCK 3 11209 54TH AVENUE NORTH 1 I 1 I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I I I I I 111792 1 101- 118 -21 -33 -0161 1 89675 1 $1,176.84 1 $1,176.84 ( -- 15335 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH ISTEPHEN C. JARNOT 1 1 I I I 1 I I ILOT 7& 8, BLOCK 3 15335 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I I IN & E PERKINS ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I $26,150.62 $24,826.80 $1,323.82 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date9 /10/90 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -17 TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS DEPT. APPROVAL: a, SY KNAPP, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW RECOMMENDATION: V No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) On Jul 23 19 t _ July 90 he City Council adopted resolution no. 90 143 providing y P P g for public hearing regarding proposed assessments for alley improvement project 1989 -17. This project provided bituminous paving in the alley between Lakeview and Twin Lake Avenues, from Lakebreeze to Lakeside Avenues. The proposed special assessments were made in accordance with the City's alley improvement policy and with the methodology iscussed at the public hearing gy P g establishing the project. All property owners have been duly notified by certified mail of this special assessment hearing. Recommendation Following the public hearing, the City Council should consider adoption of the attached resolution, which would certify the proposed special assessments for collection on the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. • ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -17 i LAKEVIEW /TWIN LAKE - LAKESIDE TO LAKEBREEZE PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (FINAL) $ 13,634.29 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $ 10,463.00 OTHER FUNDS $ 3,171.29 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PER BUILDABLE SITE AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL DIRECT ACCESS $ 1,778.71 $ 1,778.71 INDIRECT ACCESS $ 523.15 $ 523.15 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TEN (10) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -17 TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed Special Assessment Levy No. 11793 for the following improvement: ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -17 LAKEVIEW /TWIN LAKE, LAKEBREEZE TO LAKESIDE AVENUES NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Such proposed Special Assessment Levy 11793, made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby ound to be benefitted b the improvement y y p ment in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years as indicated on the assessment roll. The first of the installments shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from October 1, 1990. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October 1, 1990 until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment, when due, shall be added interest for one year on all paid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment ent is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. RESOLUTION NO. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ------------------------------------------------ September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION --------- --- - ---- -- --------------- - Improvement Project No.: 1989 -17 Levy No.: 11793 Description: Alley Paving Fund /Code No.: 591027 Levy Description: ALLEY (89 -17) 90 Location: Between Lakeview and Twin Lake Avenue, Levy runs ten (10) years with interest at the rate From Lakebreeze to Lakeside Avenues of ten (10) percent. Improvement Hearing Date: June 26, 1989 First payment, with property taxes payable in 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: June 26, 1989 Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 by Resolution No.: 89 -130 Adopted on: Assessment District: Direct: Access from alley Indirect: Access from street by Resolution No.: Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Method of Apportionment: Direct: $1,778.71 /parcel Indirect: $523.15 /parcel Cost Summary from Resolution No.: 90 -118 TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: $13,634.29 Less Direct City Share: $ 3,171.29 (Fund M.S.A.) Less Other Payments: TOTAL ASSESSED: $10,463.00 City Property: Other Public Property: Private Property: $10,463.00 • i 0 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ALLEY (89 -17) 90 MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL PAGE 2 OF 2 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11793 10- 118 -21 -32 -0033 89495 $1,778.71 4721 LAKEVIEW AVENUE MARY KNIGHT LOT 3, BLOCK 3 4721 LAKEVIEW AVENUE LAKEBREEZE ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11793 10- 118 -21 -32 -0034 89495 $1,778.71 4729 LAKEVIEW AVENUE DAVID AUDETTE LOT 4, BLOCK 3 4729 LAKEVIEW AVENUE LAKEBREEZE ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11793 10- 118 -21 -32 -0035 89495 $523.15 4735 LAKEVIEW AVENUE DAVID S SUSAN WEISS LOT 5, BLOCK 3 4735 LAKEVIEW AVENUE LAKEBREEZE ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11793 10- 118 -21 -32 -0036 89495 $523.15 4741 LAKEVIEW AVENUE BRIAN & MELONIE THYMIAN LOT 6, BLOCK 3 4741 LAKEVIEW AVENUE LAKEBREEZE ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11793 10- 118 -21 -32 -0037 89495 $1,778.71 4748 TWIN LAKE AVENUE PAUL & BETTY ENGE LOT 7 & 8, BLOCK 3 4748 TWIN LAKE AVENUE LAKEBREEZE ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11793 10- 118 -21 -32 -0037 89495 $523.15 4752 TWIN LAKE AVENUE PAUL & BETTY ENGE LOT 7 & 8, BLOCK 3 4752 TWIN LAKE AVENUE LAKEBREEZE ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11793 10- 118 -21 -32 -0038 89495 $1,778.71 4740 TWIN LAKE AVENUE DUWAYNE A. SCHAKE LOT 9, BLOCK 3 4740 TWIN LAKE AVENUE LAKEBREEZE ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 11793 10- 118 -21 -32 -0039 89495 $1,778.71 4734 TWIN LAKE AVENUE RICHARD BECHT /E. ARMSTRONG LOT 10, BLOCK 3 4734 TWIN LAKE AVENUE LAKEBREEZE ADDITION BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 $10,463.00 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number .a LL _ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR DEFERMENT OF CERTAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND DELETING THOSE ASSESSMENTS FROM PROPOSED LEVY #11799 *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: ti SY KNAPP, 6RECTOR OF WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached City of Brooklyn Center special assessment policy allows single - family ® residential property owners whose properties are on corners, or which otherwise have frontage on two or more streets to avoid being assessed for multiple street improvement projects. This policy allows these owners to choose to be assessed for a current street improvement project on one frontage, or defer being assessed until such time as an improvement project improves the other street on which they have frontage. Such a choice was extended to the eligible property owners proposed to be assessed for the West River Road project. To date, the following property owners have chosen to defer assessment: Name Address Amount Deferred PID # William & Theresa Olson 7200 West River Road $1,351.00 25- 119 -21 -42 -0013 Norris & Barbara Hanson 315 70th Avenue N. 1,351.00 25- 119 -21 -43 -0021 Russell L. Nemitz 6901 Dallas Rd. 1,351.00 25- 119 -21 -43 -0036 Robert C. Wilber 6857 Dallas Rd. 1,351.00 36- 119 -21 -12 -0061 One ro ert owner, John Kelly, West River o as chosen to be assessed a P p y y, Road, h h n t this time. Council Action Required A resolution approving these deferrals and deleting the assessments from the proposed • levy roll is provided. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR DEFERMENT OF CERTAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND DELETING THOSE ASSESSMENTS FROM PROPOSED LEVY #11799 WHEREAS, City street improvement special assessment policy provides single- family residential property owners fronting on two streets a choice of which street improvement projects for which they wish to be assessed; and WHEREAS, such a choice was offered to eligible property owners proposed to be assessed for street improvement project 1988 -18; and WHEREAS, some of those property owners have chosen to defer their assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the proposed special assessments for the following properties are hereby deferred, and deleted from the proposed levy roll: Name Address Amount Deferred PID # William & Theresa Olson 7200 West River Road $1,351.00 25- 119 -21 -42 -0013 Norris & Barbara Hanson 315 70th Avenue N. 1,351.00 25- 119 -21 -43 -0021 Russell L. Nemitz 6901 Dallas Rd. 1,351.00 25- 119 -21 -43 -0036 Robert C. Wilber 6857 Dallas Rd. 1,351.00 36- 119 -21 -12 -0061 Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the followin g g voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9 10 90 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1988 -18 TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KbIAPP , DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * ** ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:_:= .:`T -. er'.✓7t+�� j�3 No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) • On July 23, 1990 the City Council adopted resolution no. 90 -145 providing for public hearing regarding proposed assessments for street improvement project 1988 -18. This project reconstructed West River Road from 66th to 73rd Avenues North, and constructed a bicycle /pedestrian trail on the west side of the road. The proposed special assessments were made in accordance with the City's standard special assessment policy for street improvement projects. All property owners have been duly notified by certified mail of this special assessment hearing. Recommendation Following the public hearing, the City Council should consider ad o g y p f the attached resolution, which would certify the P proposed special assessments for P collection on the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. I STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1988 -18 WEST RIVER ROAD PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (ESTIMATED) $1,552,837 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $79,402 OTHER FUNDS $1,473,435 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PER BUILDABLE SITE AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL R -1, PER PARCEL $1,351.00 $1,351.00 R -2, PER FRONT FOOT $17.95 $17.95 w R -4, PER SQUARE FOOT $0.3562 $0.3552 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TWENTY (20) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1988 -18 TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed Special Assessment Levy No. 11799 for the following improvement: WEST RIVER ROAD IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1988 -18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Such proposed Special Assessment Levy 11799, made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of twenty (20) years as indicated on the assessment roll. The first of the installments shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from October 1, 1990. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October 1, 1990 until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment, when due, shall be added interest for one year on all paid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. RESOLUTION NO. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ------------------------------------------------ September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION Improvement Project No.: 1988 -18 Levy No.: 11799 Description: Reconstruction of West River Road Fund /Code No.: 59/033 Levy Description: STREET (88 -18) 90 Levy runs twenty (20) years with interest at the rate Location: West River Road Between 66th and 73rd Avenues North of ten (10) percent. Improvement Hearing Date: August 18, 1989 First payment, with property taxes payable in 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: August 18, 1989 Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 by Resolution No.: 89 -166 Adopted on: Assessment District: Those properties abutting West River Road, from 66th to 73rd Avenues North: standard 1989 by Resolution No.: street assessment rates by zoning district. Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Method of Apportionment: R1: $1,351 /parcel I R2: $17.95 /front foot R4: $0.3562 /square foot Cost Summary from Resolution No.: 90 -115 TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: $1,552,837.00 Less Direct City Share: $ 817,798.18 Less Other Payments: $ 655,637.00 TOTAL ASSESSED: $ 79,401.82 City Property: $ 9,856.70 Other Public Property: Private Property: $ 69,545.12 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL STREET (88 -18) 90 PAGE 2 OF 5 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11799 25- 119 -21 -42 -0013 89526 $2,702.00 7200 WEST RIVER ROAD WIILLIAM E & TERESA OLSON W 195 ft Lot 1 Block 2 LAWRENCE 7200 West River Road ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 25- 119 -21 -42 -0018 89639 $1,351.00 7118 WEST RIVER ROAD TERRY ALLEN HOFFMAN Lot 19 Block 1 NORTH RIVER ESTATES 7118 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 I 11799 25- 119 -21 -42 -0019 89639 $1,351.00 7124 WEST RIVER ROAD JOHN W KELLY Lot 20 Block 1 NORTH RIVER ESTATES 7124 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 25- 119 -21 -42 -0040 90033 $1,854.23 7206 -12 WEST RIVER ROAD HARSHAD P & REKHA H BAHTT Lot 8 Block 5 SUNNY -BROOK TERRACE 20999 Isle Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 I I 11799 25- 119 -21 -42 -0041 90033 $1,854.23 7218 -24 WEST RIVER ROAD ROBERT E & ARLENE JOHNSON Lot 9 Block 5 SUNNY -BROOK TERRACE 4129 - 85th Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 11799 25- 119 -21 -42 -0042 90057 $5,360.45 7250 WEST RIVER ROAD HAROLD SWANSON Lot 1 Block 1 SWANSON ADDITION 8420 Xerxes Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 11799 25- 119 -21 -42 -0043 90057 $9,500.21 7240 WEST RIVER ROAD HAROLD SWANSON Lot 2 Block 1 SWANSON ADDITION 8420 Xerxes Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 11799 25- 119 -21 -42 -0044 90057 $5,042.00 7230 WEST RIVER ROAD HAROLD SWANSON Lot 3 Block 1 SWANSON ADDITION 8420 Xerxes Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 11799 25- 119 -21 -43 -0009 89260 $1,351.00 7006 WEST RIVER ROAD PETER F BOONE Lot 2 Block 2 BRANDON ADDITON 7006 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 25- 119 -21 -43 -0010 89260 $1,351.00 312 - 70TH AVENUE NORTH DENNIS E NELSON Lot 3 Block 3 BRANDON ADDITION 312 - 70th Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 25- 119 -21 -43 -0021 89480 $1,351.00 315 - 70TH AVENUE NORTH NORRIS L & BARBARA A HANSON Lot 3 Block 3 KELLEY ESTATES 315 - 70th Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 0 0 9 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL STREET (88 -18) 90 PAGE 3 OF 5 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11799 25-119 -21 -43 -0036 89559 $1,351.00 6901 DALLAS ROAD RUSSELL L NEMITZ Lot 5 Block 2 LUNDGRENS 3RD 6901 Dallas Road ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 25- 119 -21 -43 -0037 89559 $1,351.00 6910 WEST RIVER ROAD BOUNHIENG & PHETSAMONE SOUTHIVILAY Lot 7 Block 2 LUNDGRENS 3RD 6910 West River Road ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 25- 119 -21 -43 -0038 89559 $1,351.00 6918 WEST RIVER ROAD ROGER D BYLAND Lot 8 Block 2 LUNDGRENS 3RD 6918 West River Road ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 25- 119 -21 -43 -0039 89559 $1,351.00 6926 WEST RIVER ROAD CHARLES E & KATHERINE A BONIFAS Lot 9 Block 2 LUNDGRENS 3RD 6926 West River Road ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 25- 119 -21 -43 -0040 89559 $1,351.00 6932 WEST RIVER ROAD RALPH R & MARY S ABRAHAMSON Lot 10 Block 2 LUNDGRENS 3RD 6932 West River Road ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 25- 119 -21 -43 -0041 89639 $9,856.70 RIVERDALE PARK CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Lots 3 -8, 13 -18 NORTH RIVER ESTATES 11799 25- 119 -21- 43-0044 89639 $1,351.00 7012 WEST RIVER ROAD RICHARD A FORBERG Lot 11 Block 1 NORTH RIVER ESTATES 7012 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 25-119 -21 -43 -0045 89639 $1,351.00 7018 WEST RIVER ROAD LOREN F HERZOG Lot 12 Block 1 NORTH RIVER ESTATES 7018 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -12 -0002 89104 $1,351.00 6856 WEST RIVER ROAD MINNEAPOLIS GAS COMPANY Lot 20 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 309. 201 South 7th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 11799 36- 119 -21 -12 -0007 89105 $1,351.00 6845 WILLOW LANE NORTH DAVID & CAROLYN WAGTSKJOLD Lot 1 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 310. 6845 Willow Lane North That prt of S 75 ft lyg W of Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Willow Lane. 11799 36- 119 -21- 12-0009 89105 $1,351.00 6854 WEST RIVER ROAD DAVID P WAGTSKJOLD Lot 1 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 310. 6854 West River Road That prt lyg N of S 75 ft and W of Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 rd. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL STREET (88 -18) 90 PAGE 4 OF 5 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11799 36- 119 -21 -12 -0011 89105 $2,702.00 6842 WEST RIVER ROAD DAVID W BERG Lot 2 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 310. 6842 West River Road That prt lyg W of rd. Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -12 -0017 89105 $2,702.00 6712 WEST RIVER ROAD FRANCIS F PEABODY Lot 7 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 310. 6712 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -12 -0018 89105 $1,351.00 6704 WEST RIVER ROAD MARSHALL A PETERSON Lot 8 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 310. 6704 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -12 -0019 89105 $1,351.00 6700 WEST RIVER ROAD ROBERT R NYSTROM Lot 9 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 310. 6700 West River ROad Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -12 -0049 89423 $2,702.00 6836 WEST RIVER ROAD UBALDO RAMOS Lot 1 Block 1 GROSSER ADDITION 6836 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -12 -0061 89559 $1,351.00 6857 DALLAS ROAD ROBERT G WILBER Lot 6 Block 2 LUNDGREN 3RD 6857 Dallas Road ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -12 -0064 90108 $1,351.00 6732 WEST RIVER ROAD MICHAEL G 5 SUSAN S SCHMIDT Lot 2 Block 1 WILDA ADDITION 6732 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -12 -0065 90109 $1,351.00 6724 WEST RIVER ROAD LEROY A FELRATH Lot 1 Block 1 WILLOW LANE MANOR 6724 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -12 -0068 90109 $1,351.00 6720 WEST RIVER ROAD LEONARD V WOOD Lot 4 Block 1 WILLOW LANE MANOR 6720 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -12 -0070 89624 $1,351.00 6728 WEST RIVER ROAD DENNIS J 6 SHIELA M HOISETH Lot 2 Block 1 FRED NELSON ADDITION 6728 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -13 -0001 89105 $1,351.00 6654 WEST RIVER ROAD HARRY P POATE Lot 10 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 310 6654 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 • ! ! CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL STREET (88 -18) 90 PAGE 5 OF 5 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 11799 36- 119 -21 -13 -0002 89105 $1,351.00 6648 WEST RIVER ROAD GUY BOBENDRIER Lot 11 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 310 6648 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -13 -0003 89105 $1,351.00 6640 WEST RIVER ROAD ROLLIN W & DELORIS E ERICKSON Lot 12 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 310 6640 West River Road Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 11799 36- 119 -21 -13 -0004 89105 $1,351.00 6632 WEST RIVER ROAD STANLEY L LEE Lot 13 AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 310 6632 West River Road Subject to rd Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 $79,401.82 it Mayor and City Council September 10, 1990 City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Dear Mayor and City Council: Regarding the proposed assessment to 7230-7250 West River Road P.I.D. Nos. 25-119-21-42-0042 through 0044: 1 protest the assessment which you are planning to Certify to the above described property. At the hearing that was held to order the project related to the above described project, I objected to the project because it didn't enhance the value of my property and was not necessary. I was told at that meeting that the project would increase the value of my property by at least the amount of the assessment and the project was ordered without regard to my objection. I have contacted appraisers and realestate sales agents regarding the increased value of my property because of the street and related improvements and no one will place any increased value because of the City Utility Project described herein. The street which was previously a State Highway (the West River Road) had carried traffic for many years at a rate many times the current or proposed volume. The answer that was given was that the street was of a different design than what the city wants now. The city also wanted to extend the trail system on the opposite side of the street. I can find no value in the proposed assessment and see no reason to pay any of it. Sincerely, Harold Swanson 8240 Xerxes Ave. No. Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55444 6836 WEST RIVER ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55430 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ALDO RAMOS (612) 560 -4051 GENERAL AGENT Brooklyn Center,MN Aug. 30, 1990 Mayor of Brooklyn Center City Hall Dear Sirs; I am a homeowner at 6836 West River Road, my home is an odd house over 60 years old ithas one bathroom and only two bedrooms, I am the only resident at this address and my inTme in 1989 was $10,900.00, t1 is year might be even less. • lam being assessed $2; 02.00 and Iam appealing this assessement, since most CE my neighbors are paying only $i,35L 00 and some have just as large property like the one in the corner of 79 th and W. River Rd.. I am asking you to reconsider and exempt me from paying this amount. Sincerely, h Ubaldo amos. s' • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/10/90 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION �'- ***************************************************************************************** ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 1989 -26 AND 1989 -27 TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) • On July 23, 1990 the City Council adopted resolution no. 90 -146 providing for public hearing regarding proposed assessments for street improvement projects 1989 -26 and 1989 - 27. These projects reconstructed Freeway Boulevard /65th /66th Avenues North, from Shingle Creek to T.H. 252 (1989 -26) and Humboldt Avenue from 65th to 69th Avenues North (1989 -27). For special assessment purposes, 1989 -26 was separated into two distinct components: Freeway Boulevard from Shingle Creek to Humboldt (1989 -26A) and 65th /66th Avenues, from Humboldt Avenue to T.H. 252. The proposed special assessments were made in accordance with the methodology discussed in the Engineer's Report regarding these improvements. All property owners have been duly notified by certified mail of this special assessment hearing. Recommendation Following the public hearing, the City Council should consider adoption of the attached resolution, which would certify the proposed special assessments for collection on the Hennepin County Tax Rolls. STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -26A FREEWAY BOULEVARD - SHINGLE CREEK TO HUMBOLDT AVENUE PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (ESTIMATED) $375,074.86 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $223,643.05 OTHER FUNDS $151,431.81 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RATES AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL ZONE A, PER SQUARE FOOT $0.2507 $0.1859 ZONE B, PER SQUARE FOOT $0.0648 $0.0480 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TEN(10)YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -26B 65TH /66TH AVENUE, HUMBOLDT AVENUE TO T.H. 252 PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (ESTIMATED) $387,387.89 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $213,666.12 OTHER FUNDS $173,721.77 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RATES AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL ZONE A, PER SQUARE FOOT $0.1930 $0.1815 ZONE B, PER SQUARE FOOT $0.0279 $0.0263 R -3, PER FRONT FOOT $18.74 $18.74 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TEN(10)YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT STREET IMPROVEMENT NT PROJECT 1989 27 HUMBOLDT AVENUE, 65TH TO 69TH AVENUES PROJECT COST TOTAL COST (ESTIMATED) $234,078.16 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $95,100.00 OTHER FUNDS $138,978.16 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RATES AT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSED HEARING FINAL PER SQUARE FOOT $0.0771 $0.0771 TERM OF ASSESSMENT TEN (10) YEARS INTEREST RATE TEN (10) PERCENT Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 1989 -26 AND 1989 -27 TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed Special Assessment Levy Nos. 11796, 11797, and 11798 for the following improvements: FREEWAY BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1989 -26A 65TH /66TH AVENUES STREET IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1989 -26B HUMBOLDT AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1989 -27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Such proposed Special Assessment Levies 11796, 11797, and 11798, made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improvements in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years as indicated on the assessment rolls. The first of the installments shall be payable with ad valorem taxes in 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from October 1, 1990. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October 1, 1990 until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment, when due, shall be added interest for one year on all paid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before RESOLUTION NO. November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of these assessments to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ----------------------------------------------- September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION Improvement Project No.: 1989 -26A Levy No.: 11796 Description: Freeway Blvd. /65th /66th Reconstruction Fund /Code No.: 59/030 Location: Shingle Creek to Humboldt Ave. N Levy Description: STREET (89 -26A) 90 Improvement Hearing Date: May 7, 1990 Levy runs ten (10) years with interest at the rate of ten (10) percent. Improvement Ordered on: May 7, 1990 First payment, with property taxes payable in by Resolution No.: 90 -97 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Assessment District: All properties abutting that portion of Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 Freeway Blvd. which lies between Shingle Creek and Humboldt Ave. N, and all properties not abutting Adapted on: Freeway Blvd. but lying between Shingle Creek Pkwy. and Humboldt Ave. N that are north of I- 94/694 and by Resolution No.: south of Freeway Blvd. Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Zone A: Area of property abutting and within 200 feet of Freeway Boulevard. Zone B: Area of benefitted property more than 200 feet from Freeway Boulevard. Method of Apportionment: Zone A: $0.1859 /sq.ft. Zone B: $0.0480 /sq.ft. Cost Summary from Resolution No.: N/A TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: $375,074.86 Less Direct City Share: $151,431.81 Less Other Payments: TOTAL ASSESSED: $223,643.05 City Property: Other Public Property: Private Property: $223,643.05 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89 -26A) 90 PAGE 1 OF 3 1 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address Name Name I NO. I NO. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 140. 1 PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address I Mailing Address I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 111796 I 135- 119 -21 -13 -0006 1 01230 1 16,275.59 12101 FREEWAY BOUELVARD IS.A.H. PARTNERSHIP I 1 1 I I (REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1538 113090 OTTOWA CIRCLE 1 I 1 I I (TRACT A (SAVAGE, MN 55378 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 111796 1 135-119 -21- 13-0012 1 02256 1 18,548.03 12200 FREEWAY BOULEVARD (PLAZA REAL ESTATE PARTNERS I I 1 I I I (REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1572 IC /O RICHARDSON REALTY 1 I (TRACT B 11410 ONE LOMBARD PLACE 1 1 1 1 I (WINNIPEG, MANITOBA CANADA R3BOX5 i 1 I I I I I I I I l 111796 1 135-119 -21-13 -0019 1 04001 1 8,997.61 12100 FREEWAY BOULEVARD IMN STATE HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE 1 1 1 1 1 1 I IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1619 12100 FREEWAY BOULEVARD 1 1 I I 1 I (TRACT A (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I I I I 1 111796 1 135- 119 -21 -13 -0020 1 04001 1 17,282.60 (VACANT (SHINGLE CREEK LAND CO. 1 1 I 1 ( IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1619 IC /O WINFIELD DEVELOPMENTS 1 1 1 I 1 I I (TRACT B 15776 LINCOLN DRIVE 1 I 1 I ( IMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 I I I I I I I 1 I I 111796 I 135- 119 -21 -14 -0004 1 89273 1 260.34 IVACANT (MORTGAGE GROWTH INVESTORS 1 1 I I I I I IBROOKYN CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK 1A MASSACHUSETTS BUSINESS TRUST I 1 I 1 1 I )PLAT 2, OUTLOT A 130 ROWES WHARF #410 1 1 I I I (BOSTON, MA 02110 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 111796 1 135 -119- 21 -14 -0008 1 89772 1 30,520.03 11800 FREEWAY BOULEVARD IST. PAUL PROPERTIES 1 1 1 1 1 IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1329 1385 WASHINGTON STREET 1 1 1 I 1 1 (TRACT D IST. PAUL, MN 55102 1 I I I I I I I I I 111796 1 135- 119-21 -14 -0009 i 90068 1 5,681.12 16511 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH (NORMAN CHAZIN 1 1 1 I I I I ILOT 1, BLOCK 1, TWIN CITIES 15353 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 602 1 1 1 1 1 I 11NTERCHANGE PARK IMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 1 I I I I I I I i I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89 -26A) 90 PAGE 2 OF 3 1 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification I I LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address Name Name I I NO. I NO. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address 1 Mailing Address I I I I I I I I I 111796 1 135- 119 -21- 14-0010 1 90068 1 7,448.48 16501 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH IROBERT L. ADELMANN I I I I I I I ILOT 2, BLOCK 1, TWIN CITIES 19240 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. 1 I I I I I I (INTERCHANGE PARK (COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I 111796 1 135- 119 -21- 14-0011 1 90068 1 27,256.19 11600 FREEWAY BOULEVARD IMORTGAGE GROWTH INVESTORS 1 I I I I I ILOT 3, BLOCK 1, TWIN CITIES IA MASSACHUSETTS BUSINESS TRUST 1 1 I I I I (INTERCHANGE PARK 130 ROWES WHARF #410 I I I I I I I I (BOSTON, MA 02110 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 111796 1 135- 119 -21 -41 -0003 1 00259 1 29,304.22 11501 FREEWAY BOULEVARD 11NTEGRA HOTEL CORPORATION I I I I I I I (REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1477 14441 WEST AIRPORT FREEWAY 1 I I I I I I (TRACT A 11RVING, TX 75061 ( I I I i I I I I I I 111796 1 135- 119 - 21-41 -0008 1 00261 1 14,625.46 16440 JAMES CIRCLE NORTH (JAMES E. & JOAN C. MADDEN I I I I I I I (REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1482 112158 GANTRY LANE I I I I I I ITRACT F (APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 i I I I I I I I I I 111796 1 135- 119 -21 -41 -0014 1 04160 1 7,380.10 11601 FREEWAY BOULEVARD IROGER FRITZ 1 I I I I I I ILOT 1, BLOCK 1, RICHARDSON PARK 1P.0. BOX 158 I I I I I I I (ALEXANDRIA, MN 56308 I I I I I I I I I I I 111796 1 135- 119-21- 41-0015 1 04160 1 2,338.81 (VACANT (SHINGLE CREEK LAND COMPANY I I I I I I I ILOT 2, BLOCK 1, RICHARDSON PARK IC /O WINFIELD DEVELOPMENTS I I I I I I I 13300 EDINBOROUGHWAY #318 1 I I I I I I I 1EDINA, MN 55435 I I I I I I I I I I I 111796 1 135 - 119 -21 -41 -0016 1 04160 1 5,369.18 IVACANT ISHINGLE CREEK LAND COMPANY 1 I I I I I I (LOT 2, BLOCK 2, RICHARDSON PARK IC /O WINFIELD DEVELOPMENTS 1 I I I I I I 15776 LINCOLN DRIVE 1 1 I I I I I I IMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 I I I I I I I 1 I I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89-26A) 90 PAGE 3 OF 3 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification I LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address Name Name 1 I NO. i N0. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address I I 111796 1 135- 119-21- 41-0017 1 04160 1 9,364.85 IVACANT (SHINGLE CREEK LAND COMPANY ILOT 3, BLOCK 2, RICHARDSON PARK IC /O WINFIELD DEVELOPMENTS 1 15776 LINCOLN DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 I 111796 1 135- 119 -21 -42 -0003 1 00261 1 6,070.35 16415 JAMES CIRCLE NORTH IB & G REALTY INC. 1 IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1482 1212 WEST WISCONSIN AVENUE ITRACT A (MILWAUKEE, WI 53203 1 111796 1 135 - 119 -21 -42 -0006 00261 1 14,710.95 16445 JAMES CIRCLE NORTH IWILLIAMS STEEL & HARDWARE 1 REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1482 128TH AVENUE NORTH & 1ST STREET NORTI 1 I I ITRACT H IMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55411 ( I I I I I I i I 111796 I 135- 119 -21- 42-0010 1 04160 1 2,209.14 IVACANT IMR EMS SYSTEM, INC. I I I I I I I ---- ----- -- ILOT 1, BLOCK 2, RICHARDSON PARK 11664 UNIVERSITY AVENUE 1 I I I I 1223,643.05 1 IST. PAUL, MN 55104 I I 1 - - - - - -1 - -- - I------------------ I------- I----------- I------------------------------------ I----------------------------------- I---------- ------- --- ---------- --- - -1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ----------------------------------------------- September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION --- ---------- - - - - -- --------------- - Improvement Project No.: 1989 -26B Levy No.: 11797 Description: Freeway Blvd. /65th /66th Reconstruction Fund /Code No.: 591031 Location: Humboldt Ave. N to T.H. 252 Levy Description: STREET (89 -26B) 90 Improvement Hearing Date: May 7, 1990 Levy runs ten (10) years with interest at the rate of ten (10) percent. Improvement Ordered on: May 7, 1990 First payment, with property taxes payable in by Resolution No.: 90 -97 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Assessment District: All properties lying between Humboldt Ave. N and Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 T.H. 252 which: are zoned or used as commercial, industrial, public, or multiple family which abut Adopted on: the north side of 65th /66th Ave. N, or which lie north of I- 94/694 and south of 65th /66th Ave. N; and by Resolution No.: all properties located within Block 1 of RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES ADDITION Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Zone A: Area of property abutting and within 200 feet of Freeway Boulevard. Zone B: Area of benefitted property more than 200 feet from Freeway Boulevard. Method of Apportionment: Zone A: $0.1815 /sq.ft. Zone B: $0.0263 /sq.ft. R -3: $18.741FF Cost Summary from Resolution No.: N/A TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: $387,387.89 Less Direct City Share: $173,721.77 Less Other Payments: TOTAL ASSESSED: $213,666.12 City Property: $ 27,982.09 Other Public Property: $ 74,009.33 Private Property: $111,674.70 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89 -26B) 90 PAGE 1 OF 7 I I PROPERTY ASSESSED I OWNER I Additional Notification 1 LEVY IPROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address I Name I Name I I NO. I NO. (IDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address I Mailing Address I 1-1-1 I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119-21 -13 -0009 1 89105 1 246.20 16512 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH (MARTIN J. WILLIAMS I I ILOT 17, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 16512 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH 1 I IND. 310, NLY 75 OF WLY 155 IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136 119-21-13 -0010 1 89105 1 246.20 16506 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH IPATRICK W. & KAREN L. PETERSON 1 I ILOT 17, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 16506 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH 1 1 i I I IND. 310, SLY 75 OF NLY 150 IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I IOF WLY 155' 1 { 1 { { { I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -13 -0011 1 89105 1 246.20 16500 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH IHENRY DAVIS i I ILOT 17, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION 16500 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I IND. 310, THAT PART OF THE WLY IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I 1155 OF LOT 17, LYING SLY OF THE I I I I I I INLY 150 THEREOF EX ST I I I I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 - 21-13 -0027 1 89720 1 1,203.62 16525 WEST RIVER ROAD 1R. R. GILBERTSON I 1 i I I I I IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 0678 11095 MISSISSIPPI DRIVE ( I I I I I ( ITRACT A, EX HWY ICHAMPLIN, MN 55316 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119-21 -13 -0028 1 89720 I 104.78 (VACANT IR. R. GILBERTSON I I I I IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 0678 1927 SOUTH 13TH AVENUE I I I ( I ITRACT B, EX HWY (HOLLYWOOD, FL 33019 I I I I I I I I I 1 { 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -13 -0029 1 89720 1 373.96 IVACANT IR. R. GILBERTSON I I I I I I 1 IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 0678 1927 SOUTH 13TH AVENUE i I I I ITHAT PART OF THE S 98 2110 FT OF (HOLLYWOOD, FL 33019 1 I I I I ITRACT C LYING E OF THE W 82 7/10 1 I I IFT THEREOF ALSO THAT PART OF TRACT I I I I I I I I IC LYING N OF S 98 2/10 FT THEREOF I I I I I I I I 1EX HWY I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89-26B) 90 PAGE 2 OF 7 I PROPERTY ASSESSED I OWNER I Additional Notification I I LEVY IPROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address I Name I Name 1 I NO. I NO. (IDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address I Mailing Address I 1-1-1 I I I I I 1 111797 I 136- 119 - 21-13 -0030 1 89720 1 295.97 1430 65TH AVENUE NORTH ILOWELL R. ZITZLOFF & I I I I I I I IW 82 7/10 FT OF THE S 98 2/10 FT ILEROY KOEHNEN 1 1 I I IOF TRACT C ALSO THE E 29 FT OF S 16365 BAY RIDGE ROAD I 1 I I I 1 1 198 2/10 FT OF TRACT D IMOUND, MN 55364 1 I I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 - 21-13 -0031 1 89720 1 341.74 (VACANT IMARVIN H. & BETTY NELSON i 1 I 1 1 1 1 IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 0678 1104 DORADO COURT 1 I I 1 I I I ITHAT PART OF THE S 98 2110 FT OF IPLANT CITY, FL 33566 1 I I I I I I ITRACT D LYING W OF E 29 FT THEREOF I I 1 I I I I I (ALSO THAT PART LYING N OF S 98 2/10 I 1 I I I I I I IFT THEREOF EX PARCEL 3B AS SHOWN ON 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1MN /DOT R/W PLAT NO 27 -20 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -13 -0032 1 89720 1 409.68 (VACANT IMARVIN H. & BETTY NELSON I I IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 0678 1104 DORADO COURT 1 I I I 1 ( I ITRACT E IPLANT CITY, FL 33566 1 I I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136-119 -21 -13 -0033 1 89720 1 949.20 IVACANT IMARVIN H. & BETTY NELSON 1 1 1 I I I I IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 0678 1104 DORADO COURT I 1 I I I ( I ITRACT F (PLANT CITY, FL 33566 I I i I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21- 13-0079 1 89789 1 11,598.99 IVACANT (ROBERT & DONNA ZITURE I I I ( ( I I IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1442 112185 48TH CIRCLE NORTH I I I I 1 I ITRACT A, EX HWY (PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 I I I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21- 13-0080 1 89789 1 3,629.26 1412 66TH AVENUE NORTH IROBERT E. SCHELL I I I I I I I IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1442 1412 66TH AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I I ITRACT B EX PARCEL 8A AS SHOWN ON IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 IMN /DOT R/W PLAT NO 27-20 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -13 -0086 1 89958 1 145.25 16646 CAMDEN DRIVE ICRAIG S. ENERSON I I I I 1 I ( ILOT 1, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES 16646 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 I I 1 I 1 I I (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89-26B) 90 PAGE 3 OF 7 I PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER I I Additional Notification I LEVY IPROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address I Name I Name 1 NO. I NO. (IDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address { Mailing Address 1 1-1-1 I I 1 I I 1 111797 1 136-119 -21 -13 -0087 1 89958 1 145.25 16644 CAMDEN DRIVE IKRISTY S. KUCERA I 1 1 1 1 ILOT 2, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES 16644 CAMDEN DRIVE I 1 I { { I IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I 1 I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21- 13-0088 1 89958 1 145.25 16642 CAMDEN DRIVE IPATRICIA M. KEENE I i 1 1 I I I ILOT 3, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES 16642 CAMDEN DRIVE I { I I I I I IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 111797 I 136- 119 -21 -13 -0089 1 89958 1 145.25 16638 CAMDEN DRIVE ITHOMAS J. LEVERENTZ 1 1 I I I I 1 ILOT 4, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES 16638 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 I 1 1 I I I I IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21- 13-0090 1 89958 1 145.25 16636 CAMDEN DRIVE IROBERT A. BRUNIG 1 1 I 1 I ILOT 5, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES 16636 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 1 I 1 I I IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -13 -0091 1 89958 1 145.25 16634 CAMDEN DRIVE IBRUCE ELLEGAARD I I I I I I ILOT 6, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES 16634 CAMDEN DRIVE I I I 1 ( I 1 1 IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 111797 1 136- 119-21 -13 -0092 1 89958 1 145.25 16630 CAMDEN DRIVE IJERRY L. SORENSON & 1 I I I I I I ILOT 7, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES IWAYNE A. VOLK 1 I I I I 1 1 16630 CAMDEN DRIVE I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21- 13-0093 1 89958 1 145.25 16628 CAMDEN DRIVE IMILAGROS R. RUSH I 1 I I 1 I ILOT 8, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES 17301 LANHAM LANE 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 IMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 1 1 { { { I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -13 -0094 1 89958 1 145.25 16626 CAMDEN DRIVE IADELE M. PINT I 1 1 1 1 I ILOT 9, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES 16626 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89 -26B) 90 PAGE 4 OF 7 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification I LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address I Name Name I NO. I NO. JIDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address I 1 1 111797 1 136- 119 - 21-13 -0095 1 89958 1 145.25 16622 CAMDEN DRIVE IMARK A. ANDRESCIK I I I I I ILOT 10, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMESIPAMELA A. HOLTUS I I I I I I 16622 CAMDEN DRIVE I 1 I I ( I IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -13 -0096 1 89958 1 145.25 16620 CAMDEN DRIVE ILYNN M. TORKILDSON I i I i I I I ILOT 11, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES16620 CAMDEN DRIVE I I I I I I I IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -13 -0097 1 89958 1 145.25 16618 CAMDEN DRIVE ISHELDON N. CARLSON I 1 I I I I I ILOT 12, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES16618 CAMDEN DRIVE ( 1 I I I I I I IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -13 -0098 1 89958 1 145.25 16616 CAMDEN DRIVE (ARNOLD L. OSTROFSKY I I I 1 i ILOT 13, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES16616 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 I I I I I ( I 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119-21 -13 -0099 1 89958 1 145.25 16615 CAMDEN DRIVE IARNOLD J. KIMBREL I I I I i I I ILOT 14, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES16615 CAMDEN DRIVE I I I I I I I I IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119-21-13 -0100 1 89958 1 145.25 16613 CAMDEN DRIVE IDIANNA ALSING 1 I I I I (LOT 15, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES16613 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 I I ( I I I I IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119-21-13 -0101 1 89958 1 145.25 16611 CAMDEN DRIVE INILA R. EIDE I I I I I ( I ILOT 16, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES16611 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 I I 1 I I I i IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -13 -0102 1 89958 1 145.25 16609 CAMDEN DRIVE IROGER H. SPANO 1 I I I I I I ILOT 17, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES16609 CAMDEN DRIVE I I I I I I I I IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89 -26B) 90 PAGE 5 OF 7 { 1 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification { LEVY {PROJECT{ PROPERTY { ADDN. { TOTAL { Address { Name { Name { { NO. { NO. {IDENTIFICATION N0.1 NO. { PRINCIPAL { Addition /Legal Description { Mailing Address { Mailing Address { 111797 { {36- 119-21 -13 -0103 { 89958 { 145.25 16605 CAMDEN DRIVE {DONALD A. & PATRICIA POPPLER { { { { { { { (LOT 18, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES 16605 CAMDEN DRIVE { { { { { { { { {BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 { { 111797 { {36- 119 -21 -13 -0104 { 89958 { 145.25 16603 CAMDEN DRIVE {LIEU & THUONG QUAN { { { { { { ( {LOT 19, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES 16603 CAMDEN DRIVE { { { { { { { {BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 { { 111797 { {36- 119 -21 -13 -0105 ( 89958 { 145.25 16601 CAMDEN DRIVE {MARION J. LOGAN { { { { { { {LOT 20, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES 16601 CAMDEN DRIVE { { { { { { { { {BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 { { 111797 { {36- 119 -21 -13 -0109 { 04268 { 11,032.95 16545 WEST RIVER ROAD {SUPERAMERICA GROUP, INC. ( { { { { { { {LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SUPERAMERICA {P.O. BOX 14000 { { { { { { { { {LEXINGTON, KY 40512 { { 111797 { {36- 119 -21 -13 -0110 { 04268 { 10,744.42 {VACANT {MILES & SHIRLEY FITERMAN { { { { { { ( {LOT 2, BLOCK 1, SUPERAMERICA 13909 WEST 25TH STREET { { { { { { { ( {MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 { { 111797 { 136-119-21 -23 -0001 { 89105 { 74,009.33 16500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH {INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT { { { { { { { {AUDITORIS SUBDIVISION NO. 310 {NO. 286 { { { { { { { {LOTS 46 & 47 16500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH { { { { { { { { {BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 { { 111797 { 136-119 -21 -24 -0012 { 89105 { 14,841.33 16535 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH {CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER { { { { { { {LOT 45, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 16301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY { { { { { { { {N0. 310, EXCEPT STREETS, THAT {BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 { { { { { { { {PART OF LOT 45 LYING N OF THE N { { { { { { { { {LINE OF THE S 2 ACRES OF LOT 3 { { { { { { { { {MENDENHALLS OUTLOTS { { { { { { { { { { CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89 -268) 90 PAGE 6 OF 7 PROPERTY ASSESSED ( OWNER I Additional Notification I LEVY IPROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. { TOTAL I Address { Name I Name 1 I NO. I NO. (IDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address I Mailing Address 1 1-1-1 I L I I I I 111797 I 136- 119 - 21-24 -0037 1 89433 1 12,489.47 16500 DUPONT AVENUE NORTH ICITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER I I I I I I IBLOCK 1, HALEKIS 5TH ADDITION, 16301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY 1 I { I I I I ILOTS 9 TO 24 INCL. IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 111797 1 136-119-21 -24 -0046 1 89625 1 11,189.57 16507 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH IREAL ESTATE EQUITIES I I I ( I I I ILOT 1, BLOCK 1, NORDLING WELTER 1ATTN: KATHY POECHMANN 1 I I { I I { ( ADDITION, THAT PART OF LOT 1 1325 CEDAR STREET, SUITE 400 I I 1 IBLOCK 1 LYING IN THE N 1/2 OF IST. PAUL, MN 55101 1 I { I I I I ISEC 36 T 119 R 21 1 I { I I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136-119- 21-24 -0047 1 90107 1 12,181.00 1700 66TH AVENUE NORTH (ORIGINAL GEORGETOWN INC. I I I I I { 1 ILOT 1, BLOCK 1, WIENSCH 1ST IC /O WIENSCH CONSTRUCTION CORP. I I 1 { I I (ADDITION 1P.0. BOX 17866 1 I I { I 1 1 1 (MILWAUKEE, WI 53217 1 { I I { I I I I I I ! 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -31 -0045 1 89625 1 25,594.48 16305 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH IREAL ESTATE EQUITIES 1 I I I I I I ILOT 1, BLOCK 1, NORDLING WELTER IATTN: KATHY POECHMANN I I { I 1 I I (ADDITION, THAT PART OF LOT 1 1325 CEDAR STREET, SUITE 400 1 I I I 1 IBLOCK 1 LYING IN THE S 1/2 OF IST. PAUL, MN 55101 1 I I I I I I ISEC 36 T 119 R 21 EX HWY I I I I I I { { I I { I 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -32 -0082 1 89685 1 10,324.45 11101 65TH AVENUE NORTH INORTHWESTERN BELL 1 I LOT 1, BLOCK 1, PRINCESS ADDITION I I I I I REAL ESTATE DEPARTMENT I I { { I I I { { 170 WEST 4TH STREET, ROOM 1 -C I 1 ST. PAUL MN 55102 ( i I I I l { { I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136- 119 -21 -42 -0015 1 01417 1 1,365.60 16351 LILAC DRIVE NORTH ILYNBROOK PARTNERS I I LOT 1 BLOCK 1 LYNBROOK BOW I I I I I I L 1850 DECATUR AVENUE NORTH 1 1 I I I I I 1ADDITION IGOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89-268) 90 PAGE 7 OF 7 1 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification I LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address Name Name I NO. I N0. JIDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 1 I 1 I 1 111797 1 136 119 -21 - 42 -0016 01417 1 4,254.36 16357 LILAC DRIVE NORTH ILYNBROOK PARTNERS I 1 I I I I I ILOT 2, BLOCK 1, LYNBROOK BOWL 1850 DECATUR AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I (ADDITION (GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 111797 1 136 -119- 21-42 -0017 1 01417 1 2,437.07 (VACANT IMARVIN H. & BETTY NELSON I I I I I 1 I ILOT 3, BLOCK 1, LYNBROOK BOWL 1104 DORADO COURT 1 I I ( 1 I I (ADDITION (PLANT CITY, FL 33566 1 1 I l I I I 1 I I 111797 1 136-119- 21-42-0018 1 01417 1 651.29 (VACANT (CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 1 I I I I I I -- ---- --- - - ILOT 4, BLOCK 1, LYNBROOK BOWL 16301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY 1 I I I I I 1213,666.12 (ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 - - - -- 1 - - -- -- I -------------- ---- 1 ------- I ----------- I ------------------------------------ i ----------------------------------- I ----------------------------------- I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ----------------------------------------------- September 10, 1990 PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION Improvement Project No.: 1989 -27 Levy No.: 11798 Description: Humboldt Avenue Reconstruction Fund /Code No.: 591032 Location: 65th to 69th Avenues North Levy Description: STREET (89 -27) 90 Improvement Hearing Date: May 7, 1990 Levy runs ten (10) years with interest at the rate of ten (10) percent. Improvement Ordered on: May 7, 1990 First payment, with property taxes payable in by Resolution No.: 90 -97 1991 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest. Assessment District: All properties abutting that portion of Humboldt Ave. Date of Assessment Hearing: September 10, 1990 which lies north of a point approximately 200 feet north of Freeway Blvd. /65th Ave. N and south of 69th Adopted on: Ave. N; all properties located within Block 1 of HUMBOLDT SQUARE ESTATES; and all properties located by Resolution No.: within Block 1 of ROSEMARY TERRACE Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: The depth of the Brooklyn Center High School property is taken for assessment purposes to be 200 feet Method of Apportionment: $0.0771 /sq.ft. Cost Summary from Resolution No.: N/A TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: $227,294.27 Less Direct City Share: $132,194.27 Less Other Payments: TOTAL ASSESSED: $ 95,100.00 City Property: Other Public Property: $ 16,726.84 Private Property: $ 78,373.16 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89-27) 90 PAGE 1 OF 5 1 1 PROPERTY ASSESSED I OWNER 1 Additional Notification 1 I LEVY IPROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address 1 Name I Name 1 I NO. I NO. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL 1 Addition /Legal Description 1 Mailing Address 1 Mailing Address I 1-1-1 I 1 I I I I 111798 1 135- 119-21-11-0002 1 89035 1 4,171.69 16737 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH (THOMAS E. & JOANN E. LIMOND 1 1 I 1 1 I I IN 1/4 OF S 112 OF COM AT A PT IN THE16715 45TH PLACE 1 I I 1 I I I IN LINE OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 DIS (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55428 1 1 I i I I I 1 388 25/100 FT E FROM THE CTR LINE 1 I I I I I I I IOF HOPPER ROAD TH S TO A PT IN THE 1 I I I ( I I I IS LINE OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 DIS I I I I I I 1388 31/100 FT E FROM THE CTR LINE 1 1 I ( I I I IOF HOPPER ROAD TH E TO SE COR ( I I 1 1 I 1 1 (THEREOF TH N TO NE CDR THEREOF TH W I I i I { I I I 1328 25/100 FT TO BEG EX ROAD I I I I I I i I I I I I 111798 1 135- 119-21 -11 -0005 1 89436 1 2,931.29 11505 69TH AVENUE NORTH INORTH SUBURBAN COMPANY 1 I I 1 I I (LOT 1, BLOCK 1, HELLSTED ADDITION (TOTAL MN INC. 1 I I I I 1 I I (PROPERTY TAX DEPT. I i I I I I I I (LOCATION #2416 I I I I I I { IP.O. BOX 500 1 1 I I I I I ( IDENVER, CO 80201 I I I I I I I I I I I 111798 1 135- 119-21 -11 -0006 1 89436 1 7,002.30 16807 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH (GARY D. LYONS I I I I I I I ILOT 2, BLOCK 1, HELLSTED ADDITION IGARNAN MANAGEMENT I I I I I I 1 1 14740 KILLARNEY DRIVE I I I I I I I I (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55422 I I I I I I I I I { { 111798 1 135-119 -21 -11 -0007 1 89739 1 944.95 16719 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH (WILLIAM E. & BONNIE L. SHUTTE I I I I I I I (REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 0993 11340 BUCHANAN PLACE NE 1 I I I I I (TRACT A (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55421 1 I I I I I I I I I I 111798 1 135- 119 -21 -11 -0008 1 89739 1 944.95 16721 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH (NELSON S. GREGG CO. I I I I I I (REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 0993 IC /O WILLIAM F. SHUTTE ( I I 1 I I I IEX ROAD TRACT B 11340 BUCHANAN PLACE NE I I { { { 1 1 I (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55421 I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89 -27) 90 PAGE 2 OF 5 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification i LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address Name Name I NO. I N0. JIDENTIFICATION N0.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address I I 111798 1 135- 119 -21 -11 -0009 1 89739 1 944.95 16715 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH INELSON S. GREGG CO. I 1 I I I I I IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 0993 IC /O WILLIAM F. SHUTTE 1 I I I I I I IEX ROAD TRACT C 11340 BUCHANAN PLACE NE 1 I I I I ( I I IMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55421 I I I I I I I I i I I 111798 1 135- 119-21-11-0010 1 89739 1 944.95 16717 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH IWILLIAM E. & BONNIE L. SHUTTE I I I I I IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 0993 11340 BUCHANAN PLACE NE I I I I I ITRACT D IMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55421 1 I I I I I I I I I I 111798 1 135- 119 -21 -11 -0015 1 00257 1 3,796.61 16637 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH IZAPPA DEVELOPMENT, INC. I I I I I I I IREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1486 111420 53RD AVENUE NORTH ( I I I (TRACT A IPLYMOUTH, MN 55442 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 111798 1 135- 119 -21 -11 -0017 1 00911 1 415.27 16753 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH (JOSEPH B. CRAIN 1 I I i I I ILOT 1, BLOCK 1, HUMBOLDT SQUARE 16753 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH I I I I (ESTATES (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I 111798 1 135-119 -21- 11-0018 1 00911 1 415.27 16749 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH ISHEILA COTTEW 1 I I I I I [LOT 2, BLOCK 1, HUMBOLDT SQUARE 16749 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I (ESTATES IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 111798 1 135- 119 -21- 11-0019 1 00911 1 415.27 16757 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH IDORIS A. KOHNER 1 I I I I I ILOT 3, BLOCK 1, HUMBOLDT SQUARE 16757 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1 I I I I I I (ESTATES IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I 111798 1 135- 119 -21- 11-0020 1 00911 1 415.27 16761 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH IJOANN L. NEUMAN 1 I I I I I I ILOT 4, BLOCK 1, HUMBOLDT SQUARE 16761 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I I (ESTATES IBROOKYLN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I I I I I I I I I I 111798 1 135-119 -21 -11 -0021 1 00911 1 415.27 16769 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH IMARTHA L. ARRADONDO 1 I I I I I I ILOT 5, BLOCK 1, HUMBOLDT SQUARE 16769 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH I I I I I I I 1ESTATES IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 0 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89 -27) 90 PAGE 3 OF 3 I PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification I LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address Name Name I I NO. I NO. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 1 1 111798 1 135 -119- 21-11 -0022 1 00911 1 415.27 16765 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH IBARRY 0. BRODSKY I I I I I ILOT 6, BLOCK 1, HUMBOLDT SQUARE 16765 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH I 1 I I I I I IESTATES IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I 1 I I 1 1 111798 1 135-119 -21 -11 -0023 1 00911 1 415.27 16773 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH ICLIVE R. & JODY C. WEST ILOT 7, BLOCK 1, HUMBOLDT SQUARE 16773 HUMBOLDT AVNEUE NORTH I 1 IESTATES IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I I I I I I 111798 I 135- 119-21 -11 -0024 1 00911 1 415.27 16777 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH IALICIA & MARIE HERNANDEZ 1 1 I I I I ( ILOT 8, BLOCK 1, HUMBOLDT SQUARE 16777 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1 i I I I IESTATES 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 111798 1 135- 119-21- 11 -0026 1 01291 ( 377.98 11537 HUMBOLDT PLACE NORTH IPETER M. JACOBSON & 1 I I I I I I ILOT 1, BLOCK 1, ROSEMARY TERRACE 1DAVID M. GEE I I I I I (ADDITION 116969 WEAVER LAKE ROAD 1 1 IMAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 111798 1 135- 119 -21 -11 -0027 1 01291 1 377.98 11543 HUMBOLDT PLACE NORTH IDAVID M. GEE & 1 1 I I I I I ILOT 2, BLOCK 1, ROSEMARY TERRACE IPETER M. JACOBSON 1 I I I i 1 (ADDITION 116969 WEAVER LAKE ROAD I I IMAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 111798 1 135- 119 -21 -11 -0028 1 01291 1 377.98 11549 HUMBOLDT PLACE IPETER M. JACOBSON & 1 I I I I I I ILOT 3, BLOCK 1, ROSEMARY TERRACE 1DAVID M. GEE I 1 I I I (ADDITION 118250 64TH AVENUE NORTH 1 1 I 1 I IMAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 I I I I I I I I I I I 111798 1 135 119 -21- 11-0029 1 01291 1 377.98 11555 HUMBOLDT PLACE NORTH IDEVRIES BUILDERS, INC. 1 1 I I I I I ILOT 4, BLOCK 1, ROSEMARY TERRACE 17564 MARINER DRIVE I I I I I I 1 (ADDITION IMAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89 -27) 90 PAGE 4 OF 5 1 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification 1 1 LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY 1 ADDN. 1 TOTAL 1 Address Name Name 1 1 NO. 1 N0. JIDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. 1 PRINCIPAL 1 Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address I Mailing Address 1 1 1 111798 1 135- 119 -21- 11-0030 1 01291 1 377.98 11531 HUMBOLDT PLACE NORTH 1DEVRIES BUILDERS, INC. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1LOT 5, BLOCK 1, ROSEMARY TERRACE 17564 MARINER DRIVE i 1 1 1 1 1 1 (ADDITION 1MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 111798 1 135 - 119-21- 11-0031 1 01291 1 377.98 11525 HUMBOLDT PLACE NORTH 1DEVRIES BUILDERS, INC. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (LOT 6, BLOCK 1, ROSEMARY TERRACE 17564 MARINER DRIVE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (ADDITION 1MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 i 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 111798 1 135- 119-21- 11-0032 1 01291 1 377.98 11519 HUMBOLDT PLACE NORTH 1MICHELLE K. SCHONHARDT 1 1 1LOT 7, BLOCK 1, ROSEMARY TERRACE 11519 HUMBOLDT PLACE NORTH 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 (ADDITION 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 111798 1 135-119 -21 -11 -0033 1 01291 ( 377.98 11513 HUMBOLDT PLACE NORTH 1LEO J. & IRMA VOGEL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1LOT 8, BLOCK 1, ROSEMARY TERRACE 13200 GRIMES AVENUE NORTH 1 1 (ADDITION 1ROBBINSDALE, MN 55422 1 1 I I I i I 1 1 1 111798 1 135- 119 -21- 11-0034 1 01291 i 377.98 11507 HUMBOLDT PLACE NORTH 1DEVRIES BUILDERS, INC. 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1LOT 9, BLOCK 1, ROSEMARY TERRACE 17564 MARINER DRIVE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1ADDITION 1MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I 111798 1 135- 119 - 21-11 -0035 1 01291 i 377.98 11501 HUMBOLDT PLACE NORTH 1CHANG YIM & LAI WAH HUI 1 1 I I I 1 1 1LOT 10, BLOCK 1, ROSEMARY TERRACE 11501 HUMBOLDT PLACE NORTH 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1ADDITION 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I i 111798 1 135- 119 -21 -14 -0009 1 90068 1 19,208.88 16511 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1NORMAN CHAZIN 1 1 I I I I I 1LOT 1, BLOCK 1, TWIN CITITES 1NORTHLYN APARTMENTS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (INTERCHANGE PARK 15353 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 602 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 i 111798 1 135-119- 21-14 -0013 1 00258 1 8,984.39 16625 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1BEREAN EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BEREAN ADDITION 16625 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89 -27) 90 PAGE 5 OF 5 { 1 PROPERTY ASSESSED { OWNER { Additional Notification { I LEVY {PROJECT{ PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address { Name { Name { I NO. { NO. {IDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. { PRINCIPAL { Addition /Legal Description { Mailing Address { Mailing Address { 111798 { 136- 119 -21 -22 -0036 { 89438 1 1,997.35 16840 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH IUNO -VEN CO. { { { { { { { {LOT 1, BLOCK 1, HI CREST SQUARE 11650 EAST GOLF ROAD { { { { { { { { ISCHAUMBURG, IL 60196 { { 111798 1 136-119-21-22 -0038 { 89438 1 3,268.67 16700 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH {MARY K. HARRINGTON { { { { { { { {LOT 3, BLOCK 1, HI CREST SQUARE 18703 HUNTERS COURT { { { { { { { { {APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 { { 111798 1 136- 119 - 21-22 -0043 { 89438 1 3,243.23 16640 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH {MARY K. HARRINGTON { { { { { { { {LOT 1, BLOCK 3, HI CREST SQUARE 18703 HUNTERS COURT { { { { { { { i {APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 { { 111798 1 136- 119-21- 22-0047 ( 89767 1 12,886.99 16800 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH {ROBERT J. & ALICE V. FOLEY { { { { { { { {REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1312 1216 SOUTH DUNLAP STREET { { { { { { { {TRACTS A, B & C IST. PAUL, MN 55105 { { 111798 1 136 119 -21 - 23 -0001 { 89105 1 16,726.84 16500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH {INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT { { { { { { {--- -- ------ {AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 310 INO. 286 { { { { I { { LOTS 46 & 47 16500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH { { { I { I 1$95,100.00 I IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I - - -- I ---- 1------------------ I------- I----------- I------------------------------------ I----------------------------------- I------ --- -------- ------ --- -- -- -- - - -1 I TO: BROOKLYN CENTER MAYOR OR CLERK FROM: LYNN TORKILDSON DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 1990 I SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -26 This letter is in objection to the assessment for IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1989 -26, specifically assessment area 1989 -26B. I reside at 6620 Camden Drive in Riverwood Townhomes. I am the owner of a SINGLE FAMILY Townhome. By law I cannot have more than one family living in my home. I feel the $145.25 assessment on my property is unjust and illegal. According to your assessment 1989 -26B "all properties lying between Humboldt Avenue North and TH 252 which: are zoned or used as commercial, industrial, public, or multiple family. . . « will be assessed. Now refer to the SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL, specifically property identification no. 36- 119 -21 -13 -0096. The owner is listed as Lynn Torkildson and the • address is listed as 6620 Camden Drive. I am challenging the City of Brooklyn Center to prove that either Lynn Torkildson or 6620 Camden Drive is commercial, industrial, public, or multiple family unit. I am a home owner not a business owner. I see no income or profit from my townhome. I do not wish to insult anyones intelligence but I'ld like to make a simple analogy. My home is like any other Brooklyn Center single family unit in that I was approved for a loan, I make a mortgage payment, pay property tax, and am responsible for any and all costs incurred from interior and exterior repairs. I do not have a management company to replace worn or out dated decor. And if I choose to move I cannot simply leave my notice and pack. You yourself have differentiated between a Riiverwood townhome and Georgetown Townhomes or Chippawa Apartments by listing each of our addresses seperatly but theirs as a group. Georgetown and Chippawa are owned and operated for a profit. As far as my property benefiting from this project, the location of my home is quite a distance from any major improvements. I received what you label as a pedestrian /bicycle trailway, which in fact is nothing more than a second sidewalk constructed along side the existing sidewalk which was never congested with pedestrian or bicycle traffic. This so called bicycle trailway has been nic -named the bike trail to nowhere because it comes to 1 an end at 252 N, which most safety minded parents would nom • advise or encourage their children to ride to. This second sidewalk has no increasing value to my home. Rather it took out frontage property and came dangerously close to pine trees that may not survive. Its construction was a burden by closing our street from July 12, 1990 to the first week in August and causing me to live with constant dirt, mud, and cement dust blocking my only way out to my bus stop every morning. The other part of the improvement project remotely close to my home is the turn lane. In three years I have never experienced a long or frustrating delay at the intersection of 66th and Camden Drive. Neither projects located near my home benefit my property's value. As I indicated at the City Council meeting on April 9, 1990, my home is on a block that holds only 4 or 5 more homes than the average Brooklyn Center city block. Camden Drive is not a thru street, therefore traffic generated from our block includes residents, guests and service companies only. The average Brooklyn Center block being a thru street would generate traffic including residents, guests, service companies and thru traffic. It is not fair to assume that we create more traffic. I own a single family home, I do not own commercial, industrial, public, or multiple family property. Therefore by the city's own decision I should not be assessed. I am requesting that the City Council reconsider the assessment. If I am assessed I will assume that the City Council has changed law and that I can S legally have more than one family living at 6620 Camden Drive. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I do not wish to come across with a hostile attitude but I hope that as fellow home owners you can understand my concern not only with this assessment but in the event that there are other assessments in the future. 2 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NUMBERS 1989 -26 and 1989 -27 Street construction including storm sewer improvements, regrading, subgrade preparation, installation of concrete curb and gutter, bituminous paving, construction of sidewalks and bikeways, and landscapin The project location is along Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue North /66th Avenue North from Shingle Creek to T.H. 252, and along Humboldt Avenue North from 65th to 69th Avenues North. For purposes of assessment the projects have been separated into three segments and three proposed levies: 1989 -26A, for which it is proposed to assess $223,643.05; 1989 -26B, for which it is proposed to assess $213,666.12; and 1989 -27, for which it is proposed to assess $95,100.00. The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: 1989 -26A: All properties abutting that portion of Freeway Boulevard which lies between Shingle Creek and Humboldt Avenue North, and all properties not abutting Freeway Boulevard but lying between Shingle Creek Parkway and Humboldt Avenue North that are north of I- 94/694 and south of Freeway Boulevard. 1989 -26B: All properties lying between Humboldt Avenue North and T.H. 252 which: are zoned or used as commercial, industrial, public, or multiple family which abut the north side of 65th /66th Avenue North, or which lie north of I- 94/694 and south of 65th /66th Avenue North; and all properties located within Block 1 of Riverwood Townhomes Addition. 1989 -27: All properties abutting that portion of Humboldt Avenue North which lies north of a point approximately 200 feet north of Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue North; all properties located within Block 1 of Humboldt Square Estates; and all properties located within Block 1 of Rosemary Terrace. • IMMPROVEMENT PROJECT NUMBER 1988 -18 Reconstruction of the existing roadway, including: storm sewer modifications; curb and gutter; grading, base preparation, and surfacing; sidewalk and /or trail construction; landscaping and lighting. The project location is along West River Road, from 66th to 73rd Avenues North. It is proposed to assess those properties abutting West River Road, from 66th to 73rd Avenues North. The amount proposed to be assessed is $79,401.82. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION FOR OBJECTIONS TO SPECIAL ASSESSIiENTS An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment as to a specific parcel of land may be made unless the owner has filed a written objection to that assessment, signed by the affected property owner, with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented such a written objection to the presiding officer at the hearing. These assessments are now on file at City Hall and open to public inspection. Written or oral objections to the proposed assessments will be considered at this meeting, but the City Council may consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION FOR DEFERRED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the City Council may, at its discretion, defer the payment of some or all of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUN1C CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL Street (89-268) 90 PAGE 4 OF 7 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification 1 LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY 1 ADDN. 1 TOTAL 1 Address Name Name 1 NO. 1 NO. 11DENTIFICATION N0.1 NO. 1 PRINCIPAL 1 Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 1 1 111797 1 136- 119 - 21- 13-0095 1 89958 1 145.25 16622 CAMDEN DRIVE IMARK A. ANDRESCIK 1 (LOT 10, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMESIPAMELA A. HOLTUS ( 1 16622 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 1 BROOK LYN CENTER, MN' 55430 I 1 1 111797 1 136- 119-21-13 -0096 1 89958 1 145.25 16620 CAMDEN DRIVE (LYNN M. TORKILDSON 1 1LOT 11, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES16620 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 1 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 ' 111797 1 136-119- 21-13 -0097 1 89958 1 145.25 16618 CAMDEN DRIVE (SHELDON N. CARLSON I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1LOT 12, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD T0WNHOMES16618 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 ( 1 I I I I I I I I ( 111797 1 136- 119-21-13 -0098 1 89958 1 145.25 16616 CAMDEN DRIVE 1ARNOLD L. OSTROFSKY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1LOT 13, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES16616 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 1 1 1 ( ( 1 1 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 111797 1 136-119-21 -13 -0099 ( 89958 1 145.25 16615 CAMDEN DRIVE 1ARNOLD J. KIMBREL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1LOT 14, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES16615 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 I I I I I I I I 111797 1 136-119 -21 -13 -0100 1 89958 1 145.25 16613 CAMDEN DRIVE (DIANNA ALSING 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1LOT 15, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES16613 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 111797 1 136-119-21-13-0101 1 89958 1 145.25 16611 CAMDEN DRIVE 1NILA R. EIDE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1LOT 16, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD T0WNHOMES16611 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 111797 1 136 119 - 21 -0102 ( 89958 1 145.25 16609 CAMDEN DRIVE 1ROGER H. SPANO 1 1 1` 1 1 1 1 1LOT 17, BLOCK 1, RIVERWOOD TOWNHOMES16609 CAMDEN DRIVE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROJECT SUMMARY Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue North /66th Avenue North and Humboldt Avenue North Improvement Project Nos. 1988 -25, 1989 -26, 1989 -27, 1990 -11 and 1990 -12 On March 12, 1990 the Brooklyn Center City Council formally initiated consideration of an improvement program which includes the upgrading of the Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue /66th Avenue roadway between Shingle Creek and T.H. 252, and the resurfacing of Humboldt Avenue North from 65th Avenue North . to 69th Avenue North. The proposed projects include the following major components. • Improved geometric designs at the intersections of Freeway Blvd /65th Avenue with Shingle Creek Parkway and with Humboldt Avenue; • A five -lane roadway with a two- way -left -turn center lane between Shingle Creek Parkway and Humboldt Avenue; • A bituminous overlay of existing 65th Avenue /66th Avenue North, easterly from the improved Humboldt Avenue intersection to Camden Avenue - and establishing that roadway as a three -lane roadway with a two- way -left- turn center lane; • Installation of a permanent traffic signal system at the intersection of Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Boulevard; • Traffic signal system changes as needed to accommodate the revised intersection geometrics at the intersection of Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue with Humboldt Avenue; • Installation of a traffic signal system at the intersection of 65th Avenue with Dupont Avenue; • Construction of a pedestrian/bicycle trailway on the north side of Freeway Blvd /65th Avenue /66th Avenue from Shingle Creek to T.H. 252; • Bituminous overlay of Humboldt Avenue from 65th to 69th Avenue; • Widening of the existing sidewalk on the east side of Humboldt Avenue, adjacent to the Brooklyn Center High School. FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS - Freeway Blvd /65th Avenue /66th Avenue Improvements In accordance with established policies, it is proposed to levy special - assessments to adjacent properties, based on two levels of benefit. Zone A is defined as that portion of property abutting and within-200 feet of Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue /66th Avenue, while Zone B is that benefitted property lying more than 200 feet from Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue /66th Avenue (see maps enclosed). It is proposed to "credit" the assessed properties one -third of the street improvement costs. For these projects, 67% of the proposed levy is assigned to Zone A, with the remainder to Zone B. It is not proposed to levy special assessments to properties which are zoned and used as R -1 (single family) properties. ' CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9/ Agenda Item Numbe REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: BUSINESS ETHICS POLICY DEPT. APPROWII A&440n Personnel Coordinator Sign ure - title MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: * 7 , S No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached X ) The city council reviewed a draft of the proposed business ethics policy at its August 27, 1990, meeting and requested clarification of the use of "public official" and "City official ". In addition, there were some concerns expressed by the council regarding the "employment of relatives" section of the policy. Attached is a revised version of the policy that should alleviate these concerns. City Attorney Charlie LeFevere and 1 have reviewed these changes and feel they will satisfy the intent of the city council. With regard to the use of "public official" and . "City official ", the policy has been amended to delete all use of "City official ". "Public official ", as described in the second paragraph of the policy, sufficient) d efines y e nes those affected b various aspects of the policy. A definition �� Y P P de o of "City employee" ee Y Y P Y has been added to the policy's second paragraph because of the desire to address issues that only im act employees. p p oyees. The section regarding employment of relatives has been completely deleted from the policy. Because this is considered a hiring policy and it is already addressed to some extent in the City's personnel ordinance (Section 17 -104, subd. 2), this section does not appear to be a necessary part of the business ethics policy. We are looking at updating sections of the personnel ordinance in the near future and will further address the concerns expressed by the city council regarding employment of relatives at that time. I plan to attend the September 10, 1990, city council meeting and will be available to answer any questions or concerns raised by the council regarding the business ethics policy. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION Pass a motion approving the business ethics policy. D CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Q D�71 BUSINESS ETHICS POLICY 1. The City of Brooklyn Center shall operate its business in accordance with the highest ethical standards and with the applicable laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota and the Charter and ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center. Specific matters or types of transactions not covered by such specific provisions shall be conducted in accordance with the following general policy. 2. For purposes of this statement of business ethics policy, the term "public official" shall include all elected officials, all members of boards or commissions, and the city manager and all employees of the City. The term "employee" shall include those personnel defined as employees in the City's personnel ordinance. OFFERING OR ACCEPTING GIFTS AND GRATUITIES 1. No public official shall misuse his or her position to secure special privileges or exemptions for such person or any other person. 2. No public official shall directly or indirectly receive, or agree to receive, any compensation, gift, reward, or gratuity in payment for the performance of his or her official duties except as may be provided by law. 3. Whenever a public official deals with a City supplier or customer, he or she has an obligation to act solely in the best interest of the City. This obligation includes not only those acts formalized by written contracts but also covers everyday business relationships with vendors or customers. 4. No public official shall ask for or accept (directly or indirectly) payment, favors, or any other thing of significant value from a current or potential City supplier or customer, or any other person in consideration for assistance or influence, or upon the representation that such assistance or influence has been or will be rendered, in connection with a purchase or any other transaction or proceeding affecting the City. This policy does not bar the acceptance of unsolicited meals, entertainment, or advertising favors which are of negligible value and are legally permissible, when no assistance is given for or any obligation to render assistance is assumed by such acceptance. 5. No public official shall offer or give (directly or indirectly) payments, favors, or any other thing of significant value to an employee or agent of a current or potential supplier, customer, or union in consideration for assistance or influence, or upon the representation that such assistance or influence has been or will be rendered, in connection with a sale or any other transaction or proceeding affecting his or her employer or principal P P and the City. This policy generally does not apply to meals, entertainment, or advertising favors which are of insignificant value and are legally permissible and are given or offered without condition that it obligate the recipient. -1- E 11 l r u """ �� 6. Acceptance or giving of gifts must be limited to incidentals which are obviously of an advertising nature as items of insignificant value, or which in no way would cause the City to be embarrassed or obligated, and no gifts or entertainment may be accepted which, due to value, circumstances, disposition of the gift, frequency or repetition of donation could cause the City to be embarrassed or obligated. Gifts which do not fit in these categories must be returned. 7. Any questions concerning the application of this policy regarding specific transactions by City employees should be referred to an employee's immediate supervisor or department head, or the city manager. Any questions concerning the application of this policy regarding specific transactions by all other public officials should be referred to the city attorney. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 1. Prohibited Conduct. a. A public official may not engage in any activity or become involved in any arrangement (directly or indirectly) through a family member or any other person acting on his or her behalf which will conflict, or may reasonably be viewed as conflicting, with his or her obligations and responsibilities to the City or involve the use of City information or goodwill for personal gain or for the gain of others. b. A City employee must make prior disclosure of any contemplated consulting, representation, or secondary employment arrangement. If the city manager determines that the proposed activity would violate this policy, the employee may not engage in it and continue City employment. 2. Action to be taken by public official: a. Whenever any public official, in the discharge of official duties, would be required to take an action or make a decision which would substantially affect the individual's financial interests or those of an associated business, (unless the effect on the individual is no greater than on other members of the official's business classification, profession, or occupation), they shall: i. Prepare a written statement describing the matter requiring action or decision and the nature of the potential conflict of interest; ii. Deliver copies of the statement to the city council, the city manager, and the employee's immediate superior, if any; iii. If a potential conflict of interest presents itself and there is insufficient time to comply with the provisions of clauses (i) and (ii), the public official shall orally inform the city council or superior of the potential conflict. -2- °6 7 b. If the public official is not a member of the city council, the city manager shall make a determination in the matter. If there is no immediate superior, the public official shall abstain in a manner prescribed by the city council from influence over the action or decision in question. If the public official is a member of the city council, at the member's request, the city council shall excuse the member from taking part in the action or decision in question. SAFEGUARDING CITY ASSETS 1. The department head or assigned manager /supervisor at each location is responsible for the safeguarding of all City assets and the correctness of data submitted to the finance department and contained in the financial reports. 2. Special protection should be afforded assets which are readily saleable because of high intrinsic value or common usage. Attention should also be given to machinery, equipment, and records which, if damaged, would stop or drastically reduce operations for an extended period. Examples of assets or documents which could provide access to assets and which need protection are: Cash Marketable securities Readily marketable products, parts and subassemblies Precious metals (raw or in any high content form) Check blanks Stamps /postage meters Common tools and equipment High value, portable equipment Data processing and other office equipment, including programs Vital records 3. Although the preparation of the financial reports is the duty of the finance department, department heads are responsible for the accuracy and reliability of the financial data. Consequently, the department heads should be concerned about all those factors which are involved in the propriety of recordkeeping and in the care taken as to the procurement, handling, upkeep, and disposal of assets of all kinds. 4. The objective should be to safeguard City assets and maintain reliable financial records at a level of acceptable business risk. No false, misleading, or artificial entries shall be made on the books and records of the City. No funds or assets shall be maintained by the City for any illegal or improper purpose. All transactions must be fully and completely documented and recorded in the City's accounting records. All City payments, except from authorized petty cash funds, must be approved by the department head or the acting department head in the department head's absence. -3- D POLITICAL ACTIVITIES, . ' 7-9a 1 The rights of employees to express their personal views on matters of public policy and to participate in partisan political activities on personal time shall be protected. An employee shall neither gain favor nor incur disadvantages within the City because of any decision or activity regarding the employee's personal political participation. 2. The personnel ordinance governs the political activity as applicable to City employees and is to be consulted for guidance. 3. Any questions concerning the application of this policy regarding specific transactions should be discussed with an employee's immediate supervisor, department head, or city manager. -4- REPRESENTATION CONCERNING D COMPLIANCE WITH CITY POLICIES 9 - 7-90 Representing my department, I declare that to the best of my knowledge, none of our employees whom I supervise is in violation of the City of Brooklyn Center policies and practices with regard to business ethics, offering or accepting gifts and gratuities, conflicts of interest, employment of relatives, safeguarding city assets, and political activities and that these policies and practices have been reviewed within the last year with all employees whom I supervise. Signature Name and Title Department Date -5- 17 -103 1. The following offices and positions shall be wholly exempt from the provisions of this ordinance. a. Officials elected by the people. b. Members of boards and commissions. i C. Volunteer members of the Fire Department. d. City Manager. e. City Attorney. 2. Employees covered by formal labor contracts with the City shall be exempt from those provisions of this ordinance which are in conflict with labor contract provisions and such employees shall be limited to the benefits provided in such labor contracts. Section 17 -104. APPOINTMENT PROCEDURE AND CONDITIONS. 1. By City Manager. All appointments to positions in municipal service shall be made by the City Manager according to merit and fitness, consistent with the provisions of the City Charter. 2. Employment of More than One Family Member. More than one family member may not be employed within any department where they routinely interact with each other in the course of business or where one may influence the work or working conditions of another; nor may relatives be placed where the will work under the direction of the same immediate supervisor. (In the application pp n of this policy, a person shall be regarded as related if such person is a brother, sister, spouse, the lineal ancestor or descendant of the prospective employee, qr the husband or wife of any y brother, sister, ancestor or descendant, or the first cousin, or the spouse of the first cousin of the prospective employee..) 3. Residency Policy. Emergency public safety response requirements dictate that a reasonable public policy be established for police officer residency. It is thereby declared that within eighteen months after original appointment, police officers shall comply with the following residency requirements: All sworn personnel must establish his or her residence so that the driving time between his or her residence and the police station will be no more than thirty (30) minutes. Any officer residing east of the Mississippi River, and who would use either Interstate 694 Bridge or the Camden Bridge in Minneapolis, must establish his or her residence so that the driving time from his or her residence to either of the aforementioned bridges is no more than fifteen (15) minutes. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 9 /10/90 Agenda Item Number /19 h REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: REVIEW OF REPLIES TO DATE TO TREE REPLACEMENT SURVEY (DISCUSSION ITEM) ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS r / MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report eport Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes } The attached memorandum summarizes the responses received to date to the City's Reforestation Survey. This survey is included in the packet of information property owners receive when they are notified that a diseased tree marked on their property must be removed. A total of 110 responses have been received. Almost 90 percent of respondents indicated that they would be interested in participating in a reforestation program. Not all respondents identified the number of trees they would want planted, but those who did wanted a total of 110. A number of respondents noted that their participation would depend on the price of the trees. The survey form provides space for respondents to make additional comments. A number of issues have been raised, including boulevard tree policy, maintenance, and the need for education and consultation. A more detailed analysis of the survey will be available later this fall. Council Action Required This summary is provided for the Council's information. The Council may wish to direct staff to continue to collect information and provide another status report at a future date. Or, the Council may wish to, based on this preliminary information, direct staff to develop a reforestation program and return at a later date with a proposal. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 BROOKLYN TELEPHONE: 569 -3300 CENTER FAX: 561 -0717 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE September 5, 1990 911 TO: Sy Knapp FROM: Diane Specto SUBJ: Reforestation Survey - Status Report Summary A Reforestation survey a being included this year with the notice property owners receive when a diseased tree on their property is marked for removal. As of September 5, 110 surveys have been returned. Most respondents would be interested in a program which would allow them to purchase one or more trees at the City's low bid price, choose where the trees would be planted, and choose Who they prefer to plant the tree(s). Only ten respondents said the City should not consider a reforestation program at all. Some respondents indicated interest in two or more trees, others did not provide a specific number. In all, the respondents would be interested in planting at least 110 trees. We have this year been including the attached Reforestation Survey with the notice property owners receive when a tree on their property is marked for removal through the City's Diseased Tree Program. As of August 28, 1990, 572 trees had been marked; taking into account properties with more than one tree marked, about 475 individual property owners received surveys. As of September 5, 1990, 110 surveys have been returned. This is a return rate of 110/475, or about 20 -25 percent. Nearly all surveys were returned by property owners who requested the City's tree contractor to remove the tree. Since it is estimated that about 250 individual property owners made such a request, a more realistic estimate of the rate of survey return is 110/250, or 40 -45 percent. 1b ION_ 1986 ALLAME81%ACTY Page Two Results So Far The survey described three program options: Option One, which would allow property owners to buy trees for their property at the City's low bid price, and choose either the City's contractor or themselves to plant the tree(s); Option Two would provide only the trees; and Option Three would have the City purchase and plant only boulevard trees. The items below summarize the responses so far. • 34 or 31 % Would participate in any of the options. • 97 or 88% Expressed a preference for a particular option. Four out of five would participate in just one option; the others were split among combinations of options. • 42 or 38% Would participate in Option One, the most flexible. • 24 or 22% Would participate in Option Two, which would provide only trees at the City's low bid price. • 32 or 29% Would participate in Option Three, where the City would plant a boulevard tree or trees. • 17 or 15% Would not be interested in participating, but thought the City should consider a reforestation program. Respondents were split between Options One and Three. • 10 or 9% Thought the City should not consider a reforestation program. • 32 respondents would prefer to plant the tree(s) themselves; an equal number would prefer someone else to do the planting. • Almost 40 percent would participate only if they could choose the variety to be planted; 60 percent would plant a recommended variety. • Respondents would be interested in planting 110 trees. A number of respondents did not identify a specific number; some said it depended on the price of the trees. Comments The survey also included space for respondents to add comments. These fell primarily into four categories: 1. A number of respondents thought the program was a good idea, and that as many trees, especially boulevard trees, should be planted as is possible. 2. Respondents noted a need for more education regarding disease, and proper care for trees. They were also concerned about the variety of trees that would be planted, and that those be chosen with care. Page Three 3. Several respondents thought the City's policy to pay only half the cost of removing boulevard trees was unfair. Several also said that it should be the City's responsibility to plant more boulevard trees. 4. The extent of participation would depend on the cost of the trees - some respondents who said they would be interested also said their participation depended on the low bid prices being a "bargain." Summary This survey was sent only to property owners who lost one or more trees this year due to disease or drought. It is likely that other property owners are also interested in participating. Survey comments suggest that any tree acquisition program be combined with some type of educational program on selection and care of trees, and prevention of the spread of disease. 110 Responses CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER As of 9 -5 -90 REFORESTATION SURVEY The City is collecting information to help determine if there is interest in a City - sponsored reforestation program. You have received this survey form because you have a tree or trees marked for removal through the City's Diseased Tree Program. The City Council is considering several options for reforesting both the boulevard and private property. These are described below. Please review these options, and answer the questions below and on the back side. This does NOT obligate you to participate in any program the Council establishes, nor is it a guarantee that the Council will establish such a program. OPTION 1: The City would request bids from tree suppliers, and would award a reforestation contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Homeowners could purchase trees at this low bid price, and choose to plant trees themselves, or for an additional charge have the supplier or a City crew plant them. Homeowners could choose where the trees would be planted. Trees planted on private property would be solely the homeowner's responsibility. OPTION 2: The City would award a contract as in Option 1, but would supply only the trees. Homeowners would be responsible for planting the trees. OPTION 3: The City would acquire trees for planting on the boulevard only. Homeowners could request a boulevard tree and suggest planting locations, but the City's forester would make the final decision as to where trees would be planted. 1. Please choose the statement below with which you most agree. Remember, this does NOT obligate you to participate in a reforestation program. 34 A. I would be interested in participating in any of the three options above. 97 B. I would be interested in (choose one or all): 42 Option 1 24 Option 2 31 Option 3 ( 9 1 &2 9 1 &3 2 2 &3 3 All ) 17 C. wou d not be in e�resTed in participa mg, but the city sTiould consider establishing a reforestation program. I would support: _7 Option 1 2 Option 2 7 Option 3 10 D. I would not be interested in participating, and the City should not consider a reforestation program. 2. If ou are interested in Option 1 who w Y p ould our ou refer plant tree (s)? P P Y— (s . ) 2 Myself 32 Someone Else 3. If you are interested in any Option, please choose the statement below with which you most agree: 2 9 I would participate only if I could specify the variety of tree to be planted. 46 I would plant the variety recommended by the City's forester. 4. I would be interested in having 11 o tree(s) planted. 5. Additional comments: PLEASE PROVIDE US WITH YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, SO WE MAY CONTACT YOU IF THE CITY COUNCIL SHOULD APPROVE A REFORESTATION PROGRAM. Name: Address: Date: THANK YOU FOR PARTICIPATING IN THIS SURVEY. THE CITY COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER A REFORESTATION PROGRAM THIS FALL, AND YOUR RESPONSE WILL ASSIST IN THAT DECISION. MOSS & BARNETT A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION M E M O R A N D U M TO: Northwest Cable Commission and Corporation Members and Greg Moore, Executive Director FROM: Adrian E. Herbst DATE: September 5, 1990 RE: LEGISLATIVE AND FCC UPDATE The following are some brief comments about cable legislation in Congress and the recent report of the FCC regarding the Cable Act. It is anticipated that the legislation will be passed before the end of the year. LEGISLATION There are a number of regulatory changes which may take place if the legislation passes. These changes include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Tierincz -The legislation would create a basic tier, consisting of local broadcast stations. Currently, the Cable Act does not require any tiers and leaves the programming, manner of programming, and tiering solely to the discretion of the cable operator. On the one hand, this tiering requirement is an important step from the standpoint of communities. It helps to ensure that all income levels will be afforded an opportunity to receive cable television services. This is so, because it is anticipated that this basic tier will be at a relatively low cost. On the other hand, what now is traditionally known as basic service will become an expanded basic service and regulation of the rates for the expanded services will not be permitted, in most cases. 2. Rate Regulation be created b the a basic tier which would y legislation will permit regulation of rates. However, the rate regulation will not be within the jurisdiction of the local franchising authority, such as this Commission. The Federal Communications Commission itself would have authority to control rates and to assure that rates do not become abusive. Many cities have sought to have rate regulation brought back because it was alleged that after the Cable Act was passed, rates had climbed tremendously. While this may be a step in the right direction and, as pointed out above, it will help to assure some degree of control over rates, for the most part, it does not accomplish what many cities had sought. 3. Must Carry -- Recently, rules of the FCC regarding the carriage of local broadcast signals by a cable operator were abolished. Then, after considerable negotiation between the cable industry and the Federal Communications Commission and the broadcast industry, a compromise was achieved. Currently, must -carry rules leave the discretion of the carriage of local broadcast signals to the cable operator. However, should the cable operator not carry local broadcast signals, then it is required to furnish an AB switch to MOSS & BARNETT A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION its subscribers, so that the subscriber can receive the signals over the air by a flick of a switch. The legislation, if passed, would again make the carriage of local broadcast signals by a cable operator a requirement. 4. Technical Standards - -At the current time, cities cannot enforce technical standards more stringent than those that are the minimum guidelines of the Federal Communications Commission. About two years ago, the right of the city to enforce technical standards was preempted by rules of the Federal Communications Commission. This new legislation will provide greater authority to municipalities in terms of enforcement of technical standards. 5. Consumer Protection -- Numerous provisions are included in the legislation which, if passed, would require the Federal Communications Commission to develop specific standards for consumer protection. At the current time, there is not a national standard regarding consumer protection. During the past year, however, the cable industry itself developed a policy. Further, many municipalities, through their local franchises, include consumer protection standards. Despite these measures, operators and municipalities still receive complaints concerning a number of consumer issues, such as response time to complaints, maintenance, support of cable systems, and other similar issues. Therefore, the rules developed by the FCC should provide cities with more authority to regulate the performance of a cable operator. It should be noted that inasmuch as many of the provisions in the legislation would require the FCC to adopt rules and standards, there will be continuing discussion and hearings concerning these matters. Because many of the provisions are not particularly favorable to local franchising authorities, it will be important for the Commission and Corporation to continue to monitor the progress on these matters and to help facilitate input by this Commission into the rule - making procedures to be conducted by the FCC. One of the complaints during the past year concerning the review of federal legislation was that Congressmen were not receiving sufficient input from local franchising authorities. Hopefully, this will soon change. FCC REPORT ON THE CABLE ACT Under the Federal Cable Act, the Federal Communications Commission was required to do a study after six years and to submit a report to Congress. The report is quite extensive. It is approximately 200 pages. The crux of the report is that it describes the current status of the cable industry today. It also, I believe, sets forth the general philosophy of the Federal Communications Commission. That is, the FCC seems committed to assure greater competition in the marketplace, as opposed to regulation, in order to ensure better performance by cable operators and also to address ongoing concerns such as rates, transfers of ownership, and claimed abuses. The report is very important, and it is our recommendation that you may want to further familiarize yourself with the report in order to understand the nature and scope of this study, as well as the general philosophy of the FCC which will, if new legislation is passed, have greater authority and responsibility to develop expanded rules regarding a number of areas concerning the regulation of cable television. 556ZKJD -2- / Decision Resou L td. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study contains the results of a survey of 400 randomly selected cable subscribers in the King Videocable service area of Hennepin County. Survey responses were gathered by professional interviewers between July 8 and July 19, 1990. It should be noted that the survey fieldwork was completed prior to the current NWCT changes: 24 -hour cablecasting; 24 -hour local news; Channel 32 upgrade; and expanded promotional efforts. The average interview of cable television subscribers took twenty -two minutes. Random samples such as this one yield results projectable to the entire universe of King Videocable subscribers within + 5.0 percent in 95 out of 100 cases. In general, the survey showed that both the viewership and the value placed upon Northwest Community Television had increased. Since 1988, viewership across the area has increased from thirty -nine percent to forty -seven percent. In addition, the percentage of subscribers feeling that Northwest Community Television is "very valuable" almost doubled: from eight percent in 1989 to fifteen percent in 1990. Both trends indicate a growing base of support for local programming and public access opportunities. Demographically, the cable television subscriber universe is somewhat heterogeneous. Forty -two percent of the households contain either schcol -aged children or pre - schoolers; thirteen percent contained only senior citizens. Twenty percent rented their current residences. Thirty -five percent were below the age of 35, while eighteen percent were above it; the majority of subscribers, however, are between the ages of 25 and 44 years old. Owner - Manager and Professional- Technical households com- prised fifty -four percent of the sample; Blue Collar and Retiree households were thirty -five percent. Almost sixty percent had attended college, but not necessarily graduated from it. The median household annual income was $42,860.00, a little higher than the Metropolitan Area suburban average. Almost three - quarters of the sample had subscribed to cable television for over two years. They did so for two major reasons: forty -eight percent mentioned the variety of offerings, and twenty -two percent pointed to better reception of programs. Eighty -six percent rated the cable television service as "excellent" or "good;" fourteen percent felt it was "only fair" or "poor." Poor reception and limited selection were the key reasons for lower ratings. Compared with last year, there was a slippage from the excellent category to the good category, but 3 12 DeC�n Court • �1inrle�a��olis, �1irinesot� 55416 • (612) 920 -033 the lower ratings remained relatively stable. Ninety -six percent intended to continue their subscription to cable television. Sixty -seven percent rated the charges they paid for cable as "very reasonable" or "somewhat reasonable;" twenty -nine percent were more critical. In comparison, electric service charges are considered similarly reasonable by eighty -four percent, and telephone service charges are rated reasonable by eighty percent. When compared with the broader standard of all the other goods and services they buy, sixty -three percent felt the charges for basic, non - premium cable television service were "reasonable;" thirty -two percent labeled them as "unreasonable." By fifty percent to twenty -eight percent, premium channel charges were deemed "unreasonable;" by forty -two percent to twenty -nine percent, Pay- Per -View charges were similarly categorized; and by thirty -four percent to eighteen percent, charges for an additional cable outlet were viewed "unreasonable." A very high ninety -two percent rated their picture and sound quality as "excellent" or "good." But, service interruptions also appear to be increasing: forty -four percent reported experiencing problems at least "occasionally." In 1989, the comparable figure was thirty -two percent. King Videocable was rated on a list of standards recommended for customer service by the Cable Television Association. Overall, the company was rated favorably. Over eighty percent said they received timely information on product and services, policies and options, and a similar number felt their bills were clear, concise, and understandable. Over two - thirds of the sample said knowledgeable, qualified representatives responded to their telephone inquiries, and responded to service interruptions promptly. Over fifty percent stated the Customer Service Center and bill payment locations were opened during regular business hours, customers were given the opportunity to specify the general time of day for installation service, and customers were notified at least thirty days in advance of any rate or channel changes. Forty -six percent also reported the opportunity for re- scheduling was offered if the technician was running late, and twenty -three percent said refund checks were received within 45 days of the resolution of the request and return of equipment. In each case, no more than ten percent disagreed that the standard was being met, and, the ratio of agreement -to- disagreement never dipped below an impressive four -to -one! On two standards, however, agreement was more contested. By forty -three percent to thirty -three percent, respondents said the wait to talk to a customer service representative was less than 30 seconds. And, by a close thirty -nine percent to thirty - seven percent, interviewees disagreed that the customer service telephone number was not usually busy. King Videocable, then, appears to meet all of the service standards except those dealing with telephone call processing. More people knew about Northwest Community Television this 2 year. School programs and local programming were the two items most associated with the service. As mentioned earlier, the audience has enlarged to forty -seven percent. Nineteen percent reported watching programs on Channels 63 -67, down seven percent since 1989. School - related programs, recitals, sports, and city council meetings were the types of programs people recalled watching on Channels 32 -37 and 63 -67 and also reported placing the highest value upon. The three previously identified market segments were again examined. Twenty -four percent of the cable subscribers reported watching local athletic events on Channels 32 -37 or 63 -67 during the past six months. Fifty -eight percent of these viewers watched events not involving relatives, friends, or neighbors. Nineteen percent of all subscribers had watched community news shows or city council and school board meetings during the same period. And, thirty -two percent of the sample had viewed child - oriented shows during the past half -year; surprisingly, just under a majority of these people were watching programs not involving relatives, friends, or neighbors. The relative rank of each segment has not changed during the past twelve months. Several shows were specifically tested for viewership. "Northwest Edition" drew nine percent of the cable subscriber audience, up three percent from last year. "Northwest Cities" drew eight percent, up four percent from 1989. "Direct Line" attracted eight percent, again up three percent from last year. "In Our Town" drew nine percent of the potential viewership. "City Reports" attracted the most viewers at thirteen percent, an increase of four percent since 1989. In each case, viewership had risen during the past twelve months. Ninety -two percent of the viewers of Channels 32 -37 and 63- 67 stated they owned video cassette recorders. About one -third had taped local program telecasts on community stations. The most popular were recitals and school events, sports trailed somewhat. One -third of these video cassette recorders had also taped programs featuring their children or the children of friends and relatives. Certainly, the opportunity to tape broad- casts of children is meeting -- or perhaps, even creating -- a demand. Fifty -seven percent of the viewers of Channels 32 -37 rated the picture and sound of local programs as "excellent" or "good." Sixty -four percent rated program content similarly high. Fifty - four percent of the viewers of Channels 63 -67 rated the picture and sound of local programs as "excellent" or "good." Seventy - seven percent rated their content similarly. In each case, a marginal increase from 1989 was noted in the rating. Eighty -three percent of the sample felt City Council Meetings in their community should be televised on cable television; only seven percent disagreed. Seventy -nine percent thought School Board Meetings should be cablecasted; ten percent disagreed. The principal source of information about local 3 activities and events is newspapers: Local weeklies were utilized by fifty -three percent, while eighteen percent relied upon the "Star- Tribune." Television was mentioned by nine percent. Twenty -one percent rated local programming on cable television to be a "principal source" or "important source" of information about their community. Subscribers would expect to find program information about locally produced cable television programs in either their newspaper or through channel "flipping." The primary sources of information about television programs, in general, were the "TV Guide," newspaper listings, the Sunday newspaper insert, and the cable guide. Only fifteen percent even "somewhat frequently" use the programming schedules shown daily on Channel 32. As mentioned earlier, Northwest Community Television was deemed either "very valuable" or "somewhat valuable" by forty - four percent of the subscribers. This again places NWCT in the middle range of all non - premium cable service channels. Its peers are currently MTV, at forty -seven percent, VH1, at thirty - seven percent, and The Learning Channel /Bravo at thirty -seven percent. In comparison with similar-programming, NWCT places much higher: Regional Channel 6 is considered "somewhat or very valuable" by twenty -two percent; FNN, at twenty -eight percent; C- SPAN, at thirty percent; C -SPAN II, at twenty -six percent; and the School Districts and Library Channels, at twenty -eight percent. Twenty -six percent of the survey reported watching NWCT during the past seven days; an additional twenty -five percent had viewed it during the previous thirty days. In other words, fifty -one percent had tuned in during the prior thirty days. Again, in comparison with peer services, it ranks exceptionally high. The subscriber average viewership for Northwest Community Television was 15.4 times during the prior six months; this was a decrease from the 18.0 registered in 1989. But, the decline is consistent with the behavior noted for other channels: only two of the eight channels re- tested showed any marginal gains. Twenty -six percent of the sample were aware of Northwest Community Television's role in the production of local programming. This was a slight decrease from the twenty -eight percent posted in 1989. However, forty -nine percent were aware of public access opportunities, up from forty -three percent one year ago, and thirty -nine percent were aware of the role of NWCT, a modest increase. People cited three major sources of informa- tion about the Northwest Community Television role in both areas: cable television itself, newspapers, and word -of- mouth. Four percent of the sample had taken training classes during the past six months, and the same percentage had produced a program for telecast. Interest in future production was down somewhat: sixteen percent were at least "somewhat interested" as opposed to twenty -two percent in 1989. Of the two services, local programming was again deemed more important than public access. Forty percent chose the former, while twenty -four percent 4 mentioned the latter. If subscribers could allot a portion of their payment to provide local programming and public access, the average amount would be $2.12. This is lower than the $2.69 average posted in 1989 and is attributable to the lower amounts indicated by newer subscribers. In comparison with other channels, however, Northwest Community Television fares very well. CNN would be allotted an average of $1.43; ESPN, an average of $1.63; Lifetime, $0.77; C -SPAN, $0.39; and, VH1, an average amount of $0.38. The difference is primarily because fewer people say they would allot "nothing" to NWCT; the services provided are deemed valuable by more people, including those who do not currently take advantage of them. When informed of the actual cost, seventy -five percent felt it was a good value, while only fifteen percent disagreed. But, when asked about a ten percent increase in the allotment to expand local programming, sixty percent declined. Subscribers, then, are basically satisfied and see great value in the current level of service provided by NWCT. In the years since 1988, Northwest Community Television has shown dramatic increases in subscriber evaluations. More people are watching its programs and placing higher value upon them. The services provided are certainly appreciated, even by those who have no interested in watching or producing local programs. NWCT has developed a solid core constituency and is augmenting it yearly. Even though only marginal changes had been made in advertising and programming format prior to this survey, the trend in viewer opinions is clearly positive. With the substantial changes currently underway, NWCT should be able to dramatically build upon this already solid foundation. 5 REASONABLENESS Charges for Services 70 63 60 57 ...... .................... ...... ...... . ................... ...... . .. ........ . . . . ........ .. ........... . ...................... ... ....... . .............. ....... .................... ................ � ME .................................................................................. .......................... ............................................... 50 . ..................... ................................. 40 . ............. ...... ....... .............. ....................... ............ ........... .......... ...... - ..... - .... .............. ............... ........... ................................ ....... .... ...... .............. ........ ....... ............................. 30 . . .. ....... ..... . .. ... . .... .......... 0 . 1 .. ..... 21 ...... ...... ...... . ............ ............. ......... ............................... ............................ ............ ....................................... 13 20 . ............... : ...... ..... ...... ...... .. ... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... .... 11 ...... ..... ............ .... 10 — ........... ........... . .. . ...... 8 ........... ........... —7 .... ..... 6 5 ...... .... 4 3 ....... ...... ...... .... 0 Very Reasonable Smwt Unreasonable Unsure Smwt Reasonable Very Unreasonable Cable Television Electricity Telephone ecislon Resources, Ltd. CUSTOMER SERVICE NCTA standards ,00 84 84 80 ...................................... ............................... 75........................................ ............................... ... .... ....... ... ..... .......... 67 64 68 61 60 _.........._ - _ .. _ _..._ _ ._ _ _. 55 43 46 40 ....... 3 .... 37 .. ............ ............ ...._. ..... _....... .......... _ _ .............. ........ 23 20 .. ....... _ _._ .... _ _.... ... 9 9 0 7 8 8 5 10 3 4 0 Qualified Not Busy Install Schedule Inform Refunds Wait CSC Open Interrupt Reschedule Bills Notified Ye s ® N o Decision Resources, Ltd. CABLE TELEVISION Rating of Service 80 70 ................................. ............................... 64 ................................. ................................................................................................................ ................................................. 59 60 ........................... ............................... ............. . ............................................................. .................................... ............................. ................. ...................... . _ ............................. ................ . _............._....... __ . ....... ................. ...... 40 ...................... ...... --- ........ ........ ............. .......... 30 ................... ........29..................... .................................................................._..._ .............................._ ............... _.......... ........ .. .. _...... 22 20 .... ................. _...................... .............................. . ............................................... .................. .............................................. ... 11 11 10 .... ............... ............... 3 ..................... _ .............................. 2 0 0 0 Excellent Good Only Fair Poor Unsure 1989 ® 1990 Decislon Resources, Ltd. VIEWERSHIP Channels 32-37 70 60 . ................................. .......................... ... ........ ...... ..... ................... .............. ............. ......... ... .... ... ......... ...... 55 55 ...................... 50 . ............. ......... ............ ......... ...... ... ........ ... ....... .. . ......... .. ...... .. ..... ... .......... .. 50 VIEWERSHIP INCREASE FOR TWO YEARS: 40 . ..... ... ..... .. . .. .. ... . ..... ......8 % . .. ... .. .. .. .. .................... ........................ 30 . ............ ... ............ ... ....... . ............. 26 ... ...... .......... .. 20 . ........... ... .... . . . .. ... .... .. .... ... -17 ...... ....17 ... ........ .... 18- .... .................. - ............. ........................ ..... ...... ........... 6 ........... ... 10 6 ... . ...... 4 2 4 ...... ...... 0 Frequent Occasional Rarely Never Unsure M 1990 1989 1988 Decision Resources, Ltd. S Channels 32 -37 Viewership Athletics 24 Community 1� Viewers may fall into one or more categories. Children 32 Declslon Resources, Ltd. PROGRAM VIEWERSHIP Community Programs 16 14 ................................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................. ......................... 12 ................................................................................................................ ............................... .......................... 10 ............ ............................... ............................... _......... ..... ..... ..... ....................... ......._. ....._. ...._ 9 9 8 8 8 ....... _ ............ ... .... _. ... ...... 6 ......... ....... 6 ................. .................................. 5 . . 4 4 NA ............ _.._ 0 NW Edition NW Cities Direct Line In Our Town City Reports 1990 1989 Decision Resources, Ltd. VALUE OF CHANNEL Non-Premium Cable Services Interfaith 13 QVC Univision 20 Regional 6 22 Showcase 22 tan 11 26 C-S NBC 27 Schools 28 BET 28 FNN 28 Country 29 C-Span so Travel 33 Nashville 3 5 VH1 37 Learnin 37 NWCY sa MTV 47 Nickel 6a Lifetime -- 60 A & E Family 62 Weather USA W"NE-ak 69 Headline WGN 74 Discover T B ES N .:79 p T 81 TN WCCO 85 CNN 97 0 20 40 60 80 100 =Very & Somewhat Decision Resources, Ltd. ATTACIMNT C Company Marketing Report Customer Information as of Month End - 1990 January February March April May June July Homes Passed 98,052 98,111 98,276 98,371 98,418 98,437 98,649 City Brooklyn Center 4,898 4,894 4,905 4,923 4,910 4,862 4,828 Brooklyn Park 9,705 9,742 9,730 9,738 9,599 9,501 9,456 Crystal 4,331 4,334 4,340 4,384 4,346 4,318 4,277 Golden Valley 3,808 3,815 3,828 3,849 3,852 3,850 33,856 Maple Grove 6,680 6,674 6,694 6,741 6,708 6,703 6,731 New Hope 3,838 3,828 3,793 3,811 3,772 3,758 3,716 Osseo 368 374 387 381 375 365 356 Plymouth 9,268 9,270 9,382 9,529 9,600 9,650 9,623 Robbinsdale 2,317 2,323 2,347 2,361 2,354 2,325 2,309 Medicine Lake 66 66 66 68 68 69 67 Corcoran 173 182 200 207 207 209 201 Rogers 91 91 89 90 89 87 86 Total 45,543 45,593 45,761 46,082 45,880 45,697 45,506 asic Services Basic 22,701 42,477 42,432 42,667 42,542 42,927 42,585 Basic /Remote 11,503 18 1 0 0 0 0 Basic /No Remote 7,577 6 1 0 0 0 0 Basic /No Converter 2,776 3,089 3,144 3,278 3,303 3,297 3,311 Basic /Volume Control 986 3 0 0 0 0 0 Total 45,543 45,593 45,578 45,945 45,845 46,224 45,896 Premium Services HBO 16,527 16,380 16,504 16,625 15,905 16,037 15,447 Shoutime 9,215 9,137 8,922 8,838 8,470 8,441 8,473 The Movie Channel 4,084 4,078 3,947 3,767 3,430 3,402 3,508 Cinemax 6,918 6,780 6,410 5,991 5,597 5,584 5,403 The Disney Channel 4,930 5,674 5,739 5,923 5,764 6,003 5,921 Total 41,674 42,049 41,522 41,144 39,166 39,467 38,752 L Other Services ------------------ ------------------ VCR Connections * 577 0 0 0 0 0 0 FM Services ** 1,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 Remotes 31,037 29,849 29,157 28,707 28,564 27,814 27,392 Add't Outlets 0 8,000 7,774 7,620 7,513 7,381 7,266 Penetration 46.44% 46.47% 47.23% 47.55% 47.45% 47.04% 46.52% Pay Product to Basic 91.50% 92.23% 91.10% 88.49% 84.93% 85.38% 84.43% Pay Per View Buys 13,206 10,711 12,249 13,046 9,667 15,692 11,584 * Moved to "additional outlet" in February ** Moved to "free" in February �3 Licenses to be approved by the City Council on September 10, 1990: FOOD ESTABLISHMENT S.A.M.S. Inc. d/b /a Subs Etc. 6048 Shingle Ck. Pkwy. Sanitarian SIGN HANGER Prowood Signs, Inc. d/b /a Edison Signs 2415 W. Industrial Blvd. Building Official GENERAL APPROVAL: D. K. Weeks, City Clerk