Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010 11-22 CCP Regular Session Public Copy AGENDA CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION November 22, 2010 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary. 1. City Council Discussion of Agenda Items and Questions 2. Miscellaneous 3. Discussion of Work Session Agenda Items as Time Permits 4. Adjourn • CITY COUNCIL MEETING City of Brooklyn Center November 22, 2010 AGENDA 1. Informal Open Forum with City Council — 6:45 p.m. — provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with citizens. Questions from the Council will be for clarification only. Open Forum will not be used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the comments made but, rather, for hearing the citizen for informational purposes only. 2. Invocation — 7 p.m. 3. Call to Order Regular Business Meeting —The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary. 4. Roll Call 5. Pledge of Allegiance • 6. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda —The following items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Council Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes 1. November 8, 2010 — Special Session 2. November 8, 2010 — Study Session 3. November 8, 2010 — Regular Session 4. November 8, 2010 — Work Session b. Licenses C. Resolution Accepting Project No. 2009 -21, Contract 2009 -L, 2009 Capital Maintenance Building Plan Project and Authorizing Final Payment to Excel Companies, Inc. d. Resolution Approving Final Plat for NORTHBROOK CENTER 2" ADDITION is CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- November 22, 2010 • e. Resolution Providing a Nine Month Extension to the Time Period for Submittal of the Northwest Family Service Center Final Plat f. Resolution Setting 2011 Employer Benefits Contribution for Full -Time Non - Union Employees g. Resolution Authorizing the City of Brooklyn Center to Enter Into a Grant Agreement with the Minnesota State Patrol h. Calling for a Public Hearing to be Held December 13, 2010, on the Proposed Denial of an On -Sale Class C Intoxicating Liquor License for AMF Earle Brown Lanes, 6440 James Circle North 7. Presentations / Proclamations /Recognitions/Donations a. Resolution Expressing Recognition and Appreciation of JoAnn Campbell- Sudduth for Her Dedicated Public Service on the Planning Commission Requested Council Action: — Motion to adopt resolution. 8. Public Hearings None. • 9. Planning Commission Items None. 10. Council Consideration Items a. Consideration of Type IV 6 -Month Provisional Rental License for 5603 Bryant Avenue North Requested Council Action: — Receive staff report. — Motion to open hearing. Receive testimony from applicant. — Motion to close hearing. —Take action on rental license application and mitigation plan. b. Consideration of 2011 Utility Rates 1. Resolution Adopting 2011 Water Utility Rates, Fees and Charges Requested Council Action: — Motion to adopt resolution. 2. Resolution Adopting 2011 Sewer Utility Rates, Fees and Charges Requested Council Action: — Motion to adopt resolution. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- November 22, 2010 • 3. Resolution Adopting 2011 Storm Sewer Utility Rates, Fees and Charges Requested Council Action: — Motion to adopt resolution. 4. Resolution Adopting 2011 Street Light Rates and Charges Requested Council Action: — Motion to adopt resolution. 5. Resolution Establishing 2011 Recycling Rate Requested Council Action: — Motion to adopt resolution. 11. Council Report 12. Adjourn Agenda Items Tabled or Continued An Ordinance Amending Chapter 4 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter, Sections 4.01 and 4.02 —This item was first read on April 12, 2010; was published in the official newspaper on April 22, 2010; and the Public Hearing was continued at the May 10, 2010, meeting until such time as the Charter Commission makes its recommendation to the City Council. • Resolution Establishing Fees for Community Garden Plots in the City of Brooklyn Center —This item was tabled at the May 10, 2010, meeting. I • i AGENDA CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION November 22, 2010 Immediately Following Regular City Council and EDA Meetings Which Start at 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers City Hall A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary. ACTIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Discussion of Grant Funds, Capital Improvement Funds, Police Forfeiture Fund, TIF 2, 3, and 4, and Infrastructure Construction 2. TIF Options for Shingle Creek Crossings 3. AMF Bowling Centers Inc. Liquor License Status PENDING LIST FOR FUTURE WORK SESSIONS Later/Ongoing 1. Junk and Inoperable Vehicles Update—Back Yard Parking December 13, 2010 2. Centennial Request- EBHC 3. Sister City Update 4. Strategic Outcome Reports 5. 2011 Brooklyn Center Celebration Update 6. Neighborhood Designations 7. Minn. Stat. 273.128 4d Rental Properties—Annual Report—January 8. Department Year End Reports 9. Active Living Program 10. Community Schools Update 11. Hwy 252 update—February 12. Graduated Sanitary Utility Rate Study 13. Garbage Hauler Organized Collection Update 14. Housing Improvement Association draft procedures 15. Joint meeting with Commissions Brooklyn Center Open Forum Registration Name-:Z;�//mil rreh Date Address Z,T 6;T Phone 4�'4�- / 3 Subject 2:2tw r>v yt Y- WI/C-- l r b I pe City Council Agenda Item No. 6a • • MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL SESSION NOVEMBER 8, 2010 CITY HALL 1. CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Special Session as an election canvass board called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 5:47 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Dan Ryan, Mark Yelich, and Tim Roche (arrived at 5:48 p.m.). Also present was City Clerk Sharon Knutson. 3. CANVASS OF ELECTION RETURNS 3a. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -141 REGARDING CANVASS OF NOVEMBER 2, 2010, MUNICIPAL GENERAL ELECTION The Brooklyn Center City Council proceeded to canvass the City election returns from all City precincts, • reporting ballots cast in the City of Brooklyn Center contests as follows: Office of Mayor Ballot Count Tim Willson 4,476 Robert Marvin 2,753 Office of Council Member Ballot Count Dan Ryan 3,650 Carol Kleven 3,036 Mark Yelich 2,955 Heidi Huckleberry 2,006 Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2010-141 Regarding Canvass of November 2, 2010, Municipal General Election. Motion passed unanimously. 4. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded adjournment of the Special Session at 5:50 p.m. Motion passed unaniYnously. i 11/08/10 -1- MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION NOVEMBER 8, 2010 CITY HALL — COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Tim Roche, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director /City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Police Chief Kevin Benner, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, and Carla Wirth, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS Councilmember Ryan referenced page 2 of the October 25, 2010, Work Session meeting • minutes, regarding the discussion on a graduated sanitary utility rate. He asked whether it was the consensus of the Council to not ask staff for a range of options that included a billing system that was weighted more in the direction of fixed cost. City Manager Curt Boganey recalled that during that discussion, there had been a strong consensus from a majority of Councilmembers that staff would report on a model based upon the consultant's analysis which weighted the cost more toward consumption rather than fixed cost. Councilmember Ryan stated that while he remained concerned about the impact to a certain set of households, he would accept the will of the Council and accept the minutes as written. MISCELLANEOUS Councilmember Lasman questioned the location of the petroleum site investigation. Mr. Boganey advised that the investigation was in the circular area in front of City Hall. Councilmember Lasman asked for an update on the DEED letter. Mr. Boganey explained there was nothing in addition to the letter received and staff will continue to monitor the potential of an on -going impact. Mayor Willson commended staff for following up on the DEED matter because it was not a sanctioned e-mail by DEED, its department, or administration. Councilmember Lasman referenced an out -of -state mailing she had received regarding a "call assurance program" and asked if a similar program was still available in Brooklyn Center for seniors to register and receive a telephone call. Mr. Boganey stated he is not aware of such an • 11/08/10 -1- DRAFT I ongoing City program. Police Chief Kevin Benner advised there used to be a TAP program but it had been canceled in 1998 due to staffing issues. Councilmember Roche reported that he noticed large limestone pieces at the intersection of Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Boulevard, replicating the limestone pieces on Bass Lake Road. He stated it looks very nice. Councilmember Roche stated he had received a call from a Liberian who handles public relations for Bridgestone and is interested in an outreach with Brooklyn Center. He stated this may be an opportunity since the City has a large Liberian community. Councilmember Yelich noted an upcoming Work Session topic is for a Sister City Update and that would be the appropriate time to bring up this option. DISCUSSION OF WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEMS AS TIME PERMITS FIREHOUSE PARK UPDATE Mr. Boganey referenced the report by Police Commander Tim Gannon indicating that calls for service to Firehouse Park since the reinstallation of a single basketball hoop on June 29, 2010, has shown no significant increase in police calls to the Park. He reviewed the calls received and noted that Mr. Gannon recommended the single basketball hoop remain in place. Councilmember Ryan stated he had heard from residents in the immediate area of the Firehouse • Park, especially residents along Bryant Avenue that face the park. He had explained to them that there had been no serious incidents since reinstallation of the single basketball hoop but those residents believe the problems remain and it may take time for them to accept what the data shows, that problems have not returned. Councilmember Ryan stated several residents in the closest proximity also think there is a noise issue. In deference to those residents, he had asked the Council to consider asking the Park and Recreation Commission to review the location of the basketball court and make a recommendation on perhaps relocating the basketball court. Mayor Willson noted the report shows a high commitment by the Police Department to check on the park and assure continued awareness. Given this report, which is quite favorable, he did not see where there was an issue that showed the basketball court should be removed He noted the Park and Recreation Commission had supported a full basketball court with two hoops instead of the half court that was reinstalled. Councilmember Ryan stated he was also struck by the outstanding efforts and commitment by staff and the Police Department to monitor what had been a difficult condition to assure restoring the hoop did not return the issues. He stated he wanted to represent the comments and concerns expressed directly to him by residents who lived in close proximity to the basketball hoop. Councilmember Roche stated his agreement with Councilmember Ryan's assessment and he also appreciates the efforts by staff and the Police Department. He referenced the calls made and suggested the people who live north of that resident had given up. Councilmember Roche suggested that a resident of this neighborhood act as a liaison to the Parks and Recreation 11/08/10 -2- DRAFT Commission, which would also provide a fresh perspective. He believed that housing prices were depressed because of the location of the basketball hoops and that the Council had a . responsibility to be forward looking. Councilmember Roche stated he believed the basketball court was in the wrong location and suggested grant opportunities be researched to relocate the basketball court. Councilmember Yelich reiterated sentiments that residents along the streets bordering Firehouse Park still resent having to endure the past problems. He agreed with Councilmember Roche that some have given up in anger. Regarding the Park and Recreation Commission, he noted their perspective is that basketball players prefer a court with two hoops and it is the City's job to provide recreational facilities that people enjoy. Councilmember Yelich stated the Police Department is good at minimizing problems through environmental design, which is consistent with the notion of relocating the hoops to the other side of the park that is bordered by the school and Fire Department without much of a residential impact. He stated it may not be possible to do this quickly due to financial limitations but as the Capital Improvement Program proceeds, it could be considered when that equipment comes up for maintenance. In addition, it would be less costly for the City to relocate the basketball court if it resulted in responding to fewer complaints. Mayor Willson stated there is a majority consensus of the Council to refer this matter to the Park and Recreation Commission to consider the location of the basketball court and make a recommendation if there is a more environmentally friendly location. The Council discussed whether the Park and Recreation Commission should also consider • whether two basketball hoops should be relocated or just the present single hoop. Mr. Boganey noted another option would be to consider a "kiddy court" that is designed for younger people. It was agreed that the Commission's recommendation should include all options but that the Council would be reluctant to return to the conditions that resulted in removal of one hoop. GARBAGE HAULER REPORT Director of Public Works /City Engineer Steve Lillehaug reviewed that at its March 8, 2010, Work Session, the Council had directed staff to review and report on the City's private "open" garbage collection. He presented staff s report that addressed the effects of garbage trucks on public infrastructure and environment, including air and noise pollution, and public safety. It was noted that the impact of garbage trucks is factored into the design of the City's pavement projects. With regard to potential cost savings with an organized system, Mr. Lillehaug pointed out that Brooklyn Center's residents already receive competitive rates. He presented advantages versus disadvantages for both an open and organized garbage collection and advised that his research revealed many communities have studied this matter and many stayed with an open system. Mr. Lillehaug advised that oftentimes advocacy groups become involved when a city is considering going to an organized system and the process becomes contentious. These advocacy groups are well- organized and contest many of the facts cited by the MPCA related to environmental impacts. He noted another program that may be a balance between open and 11/08/10 -3- DRAFT organized systems would be a neighborhood collection system where residents within a neighborhood solicit rates from garbage haulers. This would be a voluntary program so it would require an active group and cooperation between neighbors. Mr. Lillehau g P City explained that if the Ci is interested in an organized system there are Minnesota statutory requirements with public notification. In addition, carriers would become involved in the process, which could become contentious. He requested Council direction on policy and a determination of whether it would make a real difference to the quality of life, environment, and infrastructure if fewer garbage trucks were on City streets through an organized collection system. Councilmember Yelich asked if it would be possible to determine a dollar figure that could be attributed to each incremental hauler in terms of wear and tear on the City's roadways. He noted that out -of- pocket costs register with residents, such as service costs, but residents don't know about infrastructure costs so if that could be more clear, it may provide enlightenment to residents and the City. Mr. Lillehaug stated some studies address that issue but are not too comprehensive. Also, a local Minnesota research board is developing a spreadsheet to address infrastructure impacts resulting from significant heavy trucks and equipment. ADJOURN STUDY SESSION TO INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the Study Session at 6:45 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. RECONVENE STUDY SESSION Councilmember Roche moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to reconvene the Study Session at 6:47 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. GARBAGE HAULER REPORT - CONTINUED The discussion continued on the garbage hauler report. Councilmember Yelich noted in addition to having fewer garbage trucks, there is also the issue of increased litter with more trucks. Councilmember Lasman stated this is not the first time this issue has come up. She stated she understands the cost to maintain roadways due to heavy vehicles but felt there was still a small i percentage who think that issue outweighs th eir ability to select their own hauler. Councilmember Lasman stated if she could see proof of lower costs and better service to residents, she would support looking at an organized collection. However, currently the rates for an organized collection system don't compare because she pays less than what an organized rate would be. She stated she thinks there would be environmental benefits but the Council serves the people and needs to be assured residents would receive a better service than they already 11/08/10 -4- DRAFT have at a lower cost. Mayor Willson concurred with Councilmember Lasman and noted that organized collection would result in government control and felt the last election showed that voters like the ability to make their own decisions. Mayor Willson agreed there would be environmental and infrastructure benefits, but doubted residents would support going with an organized and government- controlled garbage collection service. I Councilmember Ran asked whether an organized collections stem would offer the City's Y g Y residents a better service than they currently have. He stated he was skeptical it could be offered at a lower cost, explaining that he has a smaller trash bin because of a two - person household, a lower rate, and free lawn waste removal through November. Councilmember Ryan stated he saw a solicitor going door -to -door asking if they would be interested in lower garbage rates, which indicates effort by haulers to be more competitive. With regard to an organized neighborhood collection, he felt it may be a problematic model due to turnover an/or contrarian residents, and questioned how it would be implemented. Mr. Lillehaug clarified that the neighborhood organization would be strictly voluntary. Councilmember Roche took exception to an indication that the MPCA statistics were not accurate, noting MPCA data had been considered accurate by the City for the Logan project. He read the policy issues and indicated he does think that organized collection would make a positive difference in Brooklyn Center's quality of life, the environment, community infrastructure, public safety, and would align with the Council's strategic goals and green community initiatives. Councilmember Roche stated he was elected to lead, even when making • a difficult decision, and believes reducing the number of trucks on residential streets would prolong the City's infrastructure, which would be beneficial to the City and residents who pay for that infrastructure. He suggested that it is a failure of political leadership if the Council fails to execute this option. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Roche seconded to close the Study Session at 7:00 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 11/08/10 -5- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION NOVEMBER 8, 2010 CITY HALL — COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:45 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Tim Roche, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director /City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, Police Chief Kevin Benner, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Carla Wirth, Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. . Mayor Tim Willson opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum. No one wished to address the City Council Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Roche seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 6:47 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 2. INVOCATION Councilmember Yelich requested a moment of silence and personal reflection as the Invocation. 3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 7:00 p.m. Webelo Scout Pack #454 presented the colors and led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. ROLL CALL 11/08/10 -1- DRAFT Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Tim Roche, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director /City Engineer • Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, Police Chief Kevin Benner, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Carla Wirth, Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Willson thanked Webelo Scout Pack #454 for their excellent job in presenting the colors and leading the Pledge of Allegiance. 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, and the following consent items were approved: 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 25, 2010 — Study Session 2. October 25, 2010 — Regular Session 3. October 25, 2010 — Work Session 4. November 1, 2010 — Joint Work Session with Financial Commission 6b. LICENSES MECHANICAL • Absolute Mechanical, LLC 5203 West 73` Street, Edina Air Quality Services 6221 Cambridge Street, St. Louis Park Eco Air, Inc. 16820 Highway 10, Elk River High Road Heating & Cooling 6650 Winfield Circle N., Rockford RENTAL — STANDARDS PRIOR TO MARCH 6 2010 3305 53` Avenue N. / Twin Lakes Manor Teddy Bear Extended LLP RENTAL — CURRENT RENTAL STANDARDS INITIAL (TYPE III — one-year license) 5245 -47 Drew Avenue N. Mai Xiong INITIAL (TYPE II —two-year license) 6820 Fremont Place N. Sharon McGray 6819 Humboldt Avenue N. A202 Raymond Charest RENEWAL (TYPE III — one-year license) 5301 Russell Avenue N. /Sommerset Place Apts. Nedzad Ceric RENEWAL (TYPE II —two-year license) 6435 Bryant Avenue N. Thomas Kaiser • 11/08/10 -2 DRAFT 5819 Dupont Avenue N. Tiet Nguyen RENEWAL (TYPE I — three-year license 4500 58 Avenue N. /Twin Lake North Apts. TLN LA NEL 6511 Humboldt Ave. N./Pines of Brooklyn Center The Pines North, LLC 4204 Lakebreeze Avenue Andrew Hardacre 5316 -20 Russell Avenue N. Daniel Hedlund 3224 67 Avenue N. Haymant Dasrath 5540 Knox Avenue N. Roberto Miguel Rodriguez Motion passed unanimously. 7. PRESENTATIONS / PROCLAMATIONS /RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS - None. 8. PUBLIC HEARING - None. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS - None. 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 10a. CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6 -MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE FOR 5307 EMERSON AVENUE NORTH City Manager Curt Boganey advised that this property was inspected and 15 property code violations were cited and ultimately corrected. He stated this property qualifies for a Type IV six -month provisional rental license based on the number of property code violations found during the initial rental license inspection and validated police incidents /nuisance calls for the past 12 months. The property owner is also required to submit a mitigation plan and report monthly on the progress of that plan. Staff has reviewed that mitigation plan and recommends approval. It was noted the property owner will be required to apply for and complete a new license application after six months. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to open the hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the hearing. Motion passed unanimously. 11/08/10 -3- DRAFT Mayor Willson asked if a motion is required to receive the staff report. Mr. Boganey stated the staff report was presented and a motion made to open the public hearing so a formal motion to • accept the report was not legally required. City Attorney Charlie LeFevere concurred. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to approve a Type IV six - month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for 5307 Emerson Avenue N. with the requirement that the mitigation plan must be strictly adhered to before a renewal rental license would be considered. Motion passed unanimously. 10b. CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6 -MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE FOR 3112 QUARLES ROAD Mr. Boganey advised that this property was inspected and 13 property code violations were cited and ultimately corrected. He stated this property qualifies for a Type IV six -month provisional rental license based on the number of property code violations found during the initial rental license inspection and validated police incidents /nuisance calls for the past 12 months. The property owner is also required to submit a mitigation plan and report monthly on the progress of that plan. Staff has reviewed that mitigation plan and recommends approval. It was noted the property owner will be required to apply for and complete a new license application after six months. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to open the hearing. • Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to approve a Type IV six - month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for 3112 Quarles Road with the requirement that the mitigation plan must be strictly adhered to before a renewal rental license would be considered. Motion passed unanimously. 10c. CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6 -MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE FOR 419 67 AVENUE NORTH Mr. Boganey advised that this property was inspected and 12 property code violations were cited and ultimately corrected. He stated this property qualifies for a Type IV six -month provisional rental license based on the number of property code violations found during the initial rental license inspection and validated police incidents /nuisance calls for the past 12 months. The property owner is also required to submit a mitigation plan and report monthly on the progress of • 11/08/10 -4- DRAFT that plan. Staff has reviewed that mitigation plan and recommends approval. It was noted the property owner will be required to apply for and complete a new license application after six months. Councilmember Yelich moved and Councilmember Roche seconded to open the hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to approve a Type IV six - month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for 419 67 Avenue N. with the requirement that the mitigation plan must be strictly adhered to before a renewal rental license would be considered Motion passed unanimously. 11. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember Yelich reminded the public of the November 9, 2010, Three Rivers Park District open house to receive input on the Twin Lakes regional trail system. The open house will be • held at the Brookdale Hennepin County Regional Library from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. Councilmember Yelich extended his thanks and appreciation to the nearly 3,000 residents who supported his candidacy for reelection to the City Council. Councilmember Lasman reported on her attendance at the following: • November 1, 2010, City Council Work Session with the Financial Commission to consider budgetary items in the 2011 Enterprise Funds. • November 3, 2010, Special Events Subcommittee meeting where discussion was held on details of the February 5, 2011, Party of the Century when the City's 100 birthday would be celebrated. She encouraged residents to call the Community Center to get tickets and more information, noting this will be a great way to celebrate our City. Councilmember Roche stated he hoped residents plan to attend the Party of the Century to celebrate Brooklyn Center's centennial birthday. He thanked and acknowledged the efforts of those who are working to plan this event and applauded their work. Councilmember Roche acknowledged the attendance of Alex and Dave, who had participated in the Brooklyn Center youth football program. He recapped the games of the past season and encouraged residents to get involved in the City's youth sports programs. Councilmember Roche also thanked the Webelo Scouts for their attendance tonight. Councilmember Ryan reported on his attendance at the November 1, 2010, joint session of the City Council and Financial Commission to review the Enterprise Funds and 2011 budget. Councilmember Ryan stated he appreciated that other members had mentioned the Brooklyn 11/08/10 -5- DRAFT Center Party of the Century and Three Rivers Park District open house that will be held at the Brookdale Hennepin County Regional Library on November 9, 2010. • Mayor Willson reported on his attendance at the November 1, 2010, joint meeting with the City Council and Financial Commission. Mayor Willson noted the Party of the Century is not the only event being planned for 2011 to celebrate the City's centennial birthday. He advised there is an organized effort to schedule events throughout the year and he hoped residents planned to attend. 12. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 7:20 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. • 11/08/10 -6- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC • DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WORK SESSION NOVEMBER 8, 2010 CITY HALL — COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council /Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to order by Mayor/President Tim Willson at 7:28 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor /President Tim Willson and Councilmembers /Commissioners Kay Lasman, Tim Roche, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director /City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, and Carla Wirth, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Also present: Bob Thistle GARBAGE HAULER REPORT • Discussion continued on the garbage hauler report. Councilmember /Commissioner Roche stated he knows it may not be a popular decision but he believes the MPCA numbers are accurate and organized collection would reduce the number of garbage truck trips, increase safety, attract families, and support the Council/EDA's strategic goals. City Manager Curt Boganey advised of the other communities currently looking at this issue, one focusing entirely on the environmental sustainability aspect. Councilmember /Commissioner Ryan stated he applauds any kind of arrangement that addresses efficiency and cost efficient delivery of service and is not opposed to looking at a managed system, if his questions can be answered to his satisfaction. Councilmember /Commissioner Yelich commented that moving to a new system involves a two - year process, is not a trivial undertaking, and he agreed with Councilmember /Commissioner Roche that the Council/EDA was not elected to make popular decisions but to do what is right for the City. He noted another option would be a franchise approach. Mr. Boganey explained how other cities with organized collection have distributed accounts based on the company's current percentage of business within their city. Councilmember /Commissioner Ryan raised the option of using an RFP process to accept the four best bids based on service level, options, price, and other reasonable criteria that addresses 11/08/10 -1- DRAFT the needs of the market. Mr. Boganey advised that is typically the way organized collection is carried out by a city. Councilmember /Commissioner Lasman supported first finding out whether organized collection was cost effective before spending staff time to develop a strategy. Mayor/President Willson stated it was the majority consensus of the Council/EDA to move forward and look further at the option of organized collection. Mr. Boganey stated staff will develop a strategy and method to determine cost comparisons for consideration by the Council/EDA at a future meeting. CITY HALL RETREAT Mr. Boganey requested Council/EDA direction on a date for the annual Council /Staff retreat when goals will be set and orientation provided for the newly elected Member. He stated staff would like to present year -end results at the Council/EDA's January Work Session. The Council/EDA discussed available dates and it was the majority consensus to schedule the annual Council /Staff retreat on either Saturday, February 12 or 26, 2011. The Council/EDA agreed with the suggestion of Mr. Boganey to use Mr. Salverda as the facilitator since he was already familiar with the City and would provide continuity. Councilmember /Commissioner Roche suggested topics for discussion including the Opportunity Site redevelopment, City -wide open house working in tandem with the Minneapolis Realtors Association, and whether the Brooklyn Center school district should be folded. He noted the school district has had seven failed referendums and low test scores so it may be better for Brooklyn Center to align itself with a more successful school district. HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA POLICY Mr. Boganey requested Council/EDA direction regarding establishing a policy to govern the use of Housing Improvement Areas in the City. The creation of a district would allow the City to fund the cost of improvements to common elements of housing structures. He advised that the Mallard Creek Homeowners Association expressed an interest in establishing a Housing Improvement Area. Mr. Boganey reviewed recent changes in the State Statute that raised threshold requirements and minimized the chance the project would not move forward. If approved, staff recommended a requirement for a 56% petition and waiver of veto rights to assure the project cannot be vetoed after the City has invested significant time and expense. It was noted this legislation will sunset in June of 2013. Mr. Boganey reviewed the process that would be used, noting it was fairly involved with strict time frames. The project would be funded through the sale of bonds and the costs assessed against the individual property owners to be paid with their taxes. If not paid, the assessment would become a lien against the property. Mr. Boganey noted that many of the City's • 11/08/10 -2- DRAFT townhomes are aging and this method may be the only option for some townhomes to finance • this type of improvements, especially in today's credit environment. Mayor /President Willson asked how the City would recoup staff and administration costs since multiple associations may request this program. Mr. Boganey advised those costs are fully recoverable and would be paid by the association by requiring the posting of a security or bond. Mayor/President Willson asked whether City staff would handle the administration of this process and purchasing bonds. If so, he asked what other tasks staff would not have time to do. Mr. Boganey stated an option is to hire a professional to handle the administration instead of using City staff. Bob Thistle introduced himself and stated this process provides an option for associations who have not put aside sufficient maintenance costs. However, the process is labor intensive, specific, and the statutes are very prescriptive in terms of what has to happen and deadlines. He explained that some cities have determined a flat percentage to cover administrative costs that is p applied to the project. Another approach is to set it up as an independent cost center and track all staff time, but is more difficult. Mr. Thistle advised that the statutes are clear that an independent financial study must be completed that ascertains the association does not have the financial wherewithal in the normal market and "but for" the City's assistance, the project could not go ahead. He explained the process that would be followed once the financial study was completed. Mayor/President Willson asked who would qualify for the improvement and about units that • have been foreclosed or under bank ownership. Mr. Thistle speculated that someone would still have the ownership, even if the bank, and the City could levy a special assessment against that unit which would be paid when the unit is sold. He clarified that the assessment is against the property unit, not the individual. Mr. Boganey stated that the significant costs at the beginning of the process for the financial analysis and independent inspection would be borne by the association up front and not incurred by the City. He recommended the City indicate which firms could be used for the financial analysis. It was noted that the City's expenses would not start until later in the process. Mr. Thistle stated the association would be required to provide specific information on unit ownership. He explained that some cities fund the project through a housing fund or community development fund with repayment through assessments while other cities issue bonds. He indicated it would probably not have an impact on the City's bond rating. Mr. Boganey noted it is not unlike the City's typical street reconstruction projects where bonds are sold and the costs assessed. Councilmember /Commissioner Ryan stated there is an interest in maintaining the City's housing stock, which includes townhomes and rental units, and asked if these projects could be funded through TIF District #3. Mr. Boganey answered in the affirmative. Mr. Thistle stated the question is whether that is the best use of those TIF funds. • 11/08/10 -3- DRAFT Councilmember /Commissioner Lasman asked how the Council /EDA would be assured the project is a good investment and the units were not in need of additional maintenance. Mr. • Thistle explained a cost benefit analysis would assure a comprehensive inspection of all units, noting they can only use this method of funding once. Mayor /President Willson asked if an ordinance is needed for each association. Mr. Thistle stated an ordinance would cover an area that may include more than one association. Mayor/President Willson asked if there would be an impact to the City's total bonding authority. Mr. Boganey stated these projects will not have such an impact. Mr. Thistle concurred and advised this would use housing authority revenue bonds that would not count against the City's general obligation tax capacity unless the City has to put money into the project because people were not paying. Councilmember /Commissioner Yelich noted that most townhome associations have an organizational structure to collect and set aside funds to cover property maintenance issues. He asked if some townhome associations were irresponsible or their business model flawed. Councilmember /Commissioner Yelich noted that some projects the City has undertaken, like the Center Pointe property, have not been positive and he was hesitant for the City to get involved with an association that was not well managed. In addition, he was skeptical about financial analysts who speculate and make assumptions on what the future will bring but just want to get the project funded. Councilmember /Commissioner Yelich asked whether the City should be involved at all and if a private resident could request general obligation bonds to put new siding on their house. Mr. Thistle explained that to participate in this program, the townhome associations would be • required to give up its ability to be independent, an independent financial analysis would be required, and the City would decide if the project would move forward. In addition, each year of the assessment, the association is mandated, by statute, to prepare and submit independent financial studies to the City. Since the assessment is a lien against the property the City would be paid, even if someone "walks away," when the property is resold. Councilmember /Commissioner Yelich expressed concern that the City will have to wait for payment, impacting cash flow, due to the high number of units on the market. Mr. Thistle explained that the unit owner has to make payment for four years or the property would go to the City and banks have historically paid the taxes because it doesn't want to lose the property. Mr. Boganey stated if the Council/EDA decides to move forward with this program, it would be for the purpose of preserving the City's housing stock and may achieve a second strategic goal of preserving the neighborhood. Councilmember /Commissioner Roche asked if the association is empowered to take the unit owner to court and file a lien if an individual owner is not current with payments. Mr. Boganey stated the association may have some rights if an owner is not meeting its obligation but that is aside from the assessment which would be paid through taxes. Councilmember /Commissioner Ryan stated both Mr. Thistle and Mr. Boganey have indicated that the City has means of recovering cost through assessments as long as a 56% petition and . 11/08/10 -4- DRAFT waiver of veto rights is required. He felt it was not a matter of past failures but the need to • assure maintenance of the City's housing stock and avoiding blighted conditions. Councilmember/ Commissioner Ryan stated on that basis, and subject to obtaining more specific information, he is willing to consider this program. Councilmember /Commissioner Lasman stated there is always some risk involved in this type of project but she supported moving forward, to operate it conservatively with checks and balances in place, noting it will avoid larger problems later on. She suggested consideration of a higher percentage requirement, 60 %, to assure unit owners were more committed, became stakeholders, and were committed to the project. Mayor/President Willson stated his support to move forward subject to addressing concerns to not subsidize, assure the City can recoup all costs, and not put the City at risk. Councilmember /Commissioner Yelich stated he remains very hesitant, felt it would be better to let the market deal with these issues, and did not think assumptions were necessarily true. He - did not believe the City should be getting in the business of providing financial services because private companies already provide financing. Councilmember /Commissioner Yelich stated it is the City's business to put standards in place, impose and enforce those standards, but not to finance them. Mr. Thistle stated if authorized, the next step would be for staff to review the policies of other cities to be sure the expectations are clear from both sides. He acknowledged that questions remain to be answered including the matter of associations that have a,high percentage of rentals. Mr. Boganey stated the "but for" test is very important and gets to the concerns expressed by Councilmember /Commissioner Yelich. He clarified that if the private sector will respond to the need, the Statute indicates the City cannot move forward with that project. It was the majority consensus of the Council/EDA to direct staff to draft a policy to govern the use of Housing Improvement Areas, established under Minnesota Statutes, Section 428A for consideration by the Council/EDA. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember /Commissioner Lasman moved and Councilmember /Commissioner Roche seconded adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 9:01 P.M. Motion passed unanimously. 11/08/10 -5- DRAFT City Council Agenda Item No. 6b • • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: November 16, 2010 • TO: Curt Bo ane City Manager g Y� Y g FROM: Maria Rosenbaum, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Licenses for City Council Approval Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the following licenses at its November 22, 2010, meeting. Background: The following businesses /persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each business /person has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Applicants for rental dwelling licenses are in compliance with Chapter 12 of the City Code of Ordinances, unless comments are noted below the property address on the attached rental report. MECHANICAL Appliance Installers of Minnesota, Inc. 14105 Rutgers Street NE, Prior Lake RENTAL See attached reports. SECONDHAND GOODS DEALER Gamestop #535 6068 Shingle Creek Pkwy Alission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Rental License Category Criteria Policy — Adopted by City Council 03 -08 -10 Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria • License Category Number of Units Property Code Violations per (Based on Property Inspected Unit Code Only) Type I 3 Year 1 -2 units 0- N � W �. Type II — 2 Year 1 -2 units Greater than 1 but not more than 4 RM Type III —1 Year 1 -2 units Greater than 4 but not more than 8 Will Type IV — 6 Months 1 -2 units Greater than 8 t s License Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Category Service & Part I Crimes. (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category 1 -2 0 -1 Impact 5 or more units 0 -0.35 • Decrease 1 1 -2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 jP Category t2 f NO, 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 1 -2 Greater than 3 Categories�� 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe conununity that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust Rental Licenses for Council Approval on November 22, 2010 Current Rental Standards Property Final Dwelling Renewal Code License Police License Unpaid Unpaid Property Address Type or Initial Owner Violations Type CFS * Type ** Utilities Taxes 370155th Ave N Single Family Initial Robert Johnson 0 II N/A II OK OK 4207 Winchester La Single Family Initial Gena Gaal 5 III N/A III OK OK 2807 66th Ave N Single Family Renewal Nicole Franklin 5 III 0 III OK OK 5906 Dupont Ave N Single Family Renewal Bruce Alan Goldberg 4 II 1 II OK OK 6406 Indiana Ave N Single Family Renewal William Coleman 0 1 1 1 OK OK 3319 Mumford Rd Single Family Renewal William Coleman 0 1 1 1 OK OK 14500 Winchester La Single Family Renewal Daniel Pettit 0 1 0 1 OK OK * CFS=Calls For Service for Renewal Licenses Only(Initial Licenses are not applicable to calls for service and will be listed N/A.) ** Final License Type Type 1=3 year Type 11=2 year Type III= 1 year Type IV=6 mos City Council Agenda Item No. 6c • • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM • DATE: November 16, 2010 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works /City Engineer 5� SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting Project No. 2009 -21, Contract 2009 -L, 2009 Capital Maintenance Building Plan Project and Authorizing Final Payment to Excel Companies, Inc. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the Resolution Accepting Project No. 2009 -21, Contract 2009 -L, 2009 Capital Maintenance Building Plan (CMBP) Project and Authorizing Final Payment to Excel Companies, Inc. Background: On October 12, 2009, the City Council awarded the 2009 CMBP Improvement Project No. 2009 - 21, Contract 2009 -L to Excel Companies, Inc., of Anoka, Minnesota. Excel Companies, Inc. has successfully completed the 2009 CMBP project work and has requested final payment for the project. Budget Issues: The original Contract amount for the 2009 CMBP Improvement Project was $202,900.00. The • total value of work, certified for final payment is $207,389.95 that includes Change Order No. 1 ($3,464.20) and No. 2 ($1,025.75). The total project cost including contingencies, administration, engineering and legal is $280,354.89 and was completed under budget in the amount of $26,635.11. The attached resolution provides a summary of costs and funding sources for the project in its entirety. Council Goals: Strategic: 5. We will continue to maintain and upgrade City infrastructure improvements J Alission Ensuring an attractive, clean, stile communitty that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved • its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROJECT NO. 2009 -21, CONTRACT 2009 -L, 2009 CAPITAL MAINTAINCE BUILDING PLAN PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT TO EXCEL COMPANIES, INC. WHEREAS, pursuant to a written Contract signed with the City of Brooklyn Center, Excel Companies, Inc., of Anoka, Minnesota has completed the following improvement in accordance with said Contract: Improvement Project No. 2009 -21, Contract 2009 -L, 2009 Capital Maintenance Building Plan Project NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Final payment shall be made on Improvement Project No. 2009 -21, Contract 2009 -L, 2009 Capital Maintenance Building Plan Project, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid to the Contractor for said improvements under said Contract shall be $207,389.95. • 2. The estimated project costs and revenues are hereby amended as follows: Original Award COSTS Amount Final Amount Contract $ 202,900.00 $ 202,900.00 Changer Order 1 $ 3,464.20 Changer Order 2 $ 1,025.75 Subtotal Contract Costs $ 202,900.00 $ 207,389.95 Other Improvement Costs $ $ 1,311.69 Admin/En ineeringfLe¢al $ 100 000.00 $ 71,653.25 Total Project Cost $ 302,900.00 $ 280,354.89 Original Award REVENUE Amount Final Amount General Fund $ 202,800.00 $ 210,801.47 Water Utility Fund $ 77,000.00 $ 53,261.90 Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund $ 23 100.00 $ 16 291.52 • Total Estimated Revenue $ 302,900.00 $ 280,354.89 • RESOLUTION NO. November 22, 2010 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon -said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • City Council Agenda Item No. 6d I COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM • DATE: November 16, 2010 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Steve Lillehau g, Director of Public Works /City Engineer U SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Final Plat for NORTHBROOK CENTER 2 ADDITION Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the Resolution Approving Final Plat for NORTHBROOK CENTER 2 ND ADDITION. Background: The attached final plat for NORTHBROOK CENTER 2 ND ADDITION was developed by the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority (EDA) to combine existing Lots 1 through 6 located at 1900 57 Avenue North. The plat would form one parcel and one outlot for future development. The Brooklyn Center Planning Commission reviewed the proposed plat under Planning Commission Application No. 2010 -002 (see attached conditions of approval). EDA is now seeking final plat approval from the City Council. In connection to this final plat, all previous unneeded easements that encumbered the property were vacated and Ordinance 2010 - 11 was adopted by City Council on August 23, 2010. The preliminary plat and final plat have been included for reference. i Budget Issues: The EDA (applicant) is required to pay a final plat application fee of $125. Council Goals: Strategic: 2. We will aggressively proceed with implementation of City's redevelopment plans i Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life andlrreserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR NORTHBROOK CENTER 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval for the final plat for NORTHBROOK CENTER 2 ADDITION as part of Planning Commission Application 2010- . 002; and WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority has applied for final approval of the Final Plat for NORTHBROOK CENTER 2 ADDITION as required by City Code. I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that the Final Plat for NORTHBROOK CENTER 2 ADDITION is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: I 1. Conditions as previously recommended by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council for Planning Commission Application No. 2010- 002. • 2. Evidence of title satisfactory to the City Attorney and City Engineer. 3. Any other conditions as established by Hennepin County for recording of said Final Plat. November 22, 2010 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: • whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION FEBRUARY 11, 2010 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Acting Chair Rahn at 7:17 p.m. ROLL CALL Acting Chair Sean Rahn, Commissioners Kara Kuykendall, Stan Leino, and Michael Parks were present. Also present were Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass, Jared Andrews, Loucks and Associates. Commissioner Joann Campbell- Sudduth was absent and excused. Commissioners Carlos Morgan and Della Young were absent and unexcused. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Acting Chair Rahn explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — JANUARY 14, 2010 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Acting Chair Rahn to approve the minutes of the January 1.4, 2010 meeting as submitted. The motion passed. Commissioners Leino and Parks abstained since they were not present at the meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — JANUARY 28 2010 There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Acting Chair Rahn to approve the minutes of the January 28, 2010 meeting as submitted. The motion passed. Commissioners Kuykendall and Leino abstained since they were not present at the meeting. ELECTION OF 2010 CHAIR AND CHAIR PRO TEM Acting Chair Rahn opened the floor for nominations for Chair of the 2010 Planning Commission. There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Parks to nominate Commissioner Sean Rahn as Chair of the 201.0 Planning Commission. Acting Chair Rahn called for further nominations three times. There being none, there was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to close nominations and elect Commissioner Rahn Chair of the 2010 Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn opened the floor for nominations for Chair Pro Tern of the 2010 Planning Commission. There was a motion by Commissioner .Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Leino to nominate Commissioner Parks as Chair Pro Tern of the 2010 Planning Commission. Chair Rahn called for further nominations three times. There being none, there was a motion by Page .l 2 -11 -2010 - ._.._.__................ Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to close nominations and elect • Commissioner Parks as Chair Pro Tem of the 201.0 Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously. APPLICATION NO. 2010-002 EDA OF BROOKLYN CENTER Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2010 -002, a request for Preliminary Plat approval to combine six parcels into one parcel of land and one outlot for future development. Mr. Eitel presented the staff report describing the location of the property and the proposal. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 2 -11 -2010 for Application No. 2010 -002.) He explained that this property is zoned C -2 (Commerce) and that the Economic Development Authority (EDA) is processing the preliminary plat to facilitate the consolidation of six lots into one'7.32 acre lot and a 0.86 acre outlot as part of the planning and marketing of this property for redevelopment. Mr. Eitel added that along with the platting process, additional right of way width will be provided along 57` Avenue and Logan Avenue to assure there will be sufficient boulevard areas for future streetscape and trail /sidewalk improvements. ivlr. Eitel reviewed the history of the site and stated that there had been an environmental assessment conducted for the property. He also reviewed the status of the MPCA clean up and Super Fund Designation associated with the former dry cleaning operation, noting that clean up /vapor extraction is planned to be completed within one year. The City will continue to pursue a No Further Action Letter from the MPCA for the developable lot. Mr. Eitel also pointed out that dedication of additional right of way will provide a minimum of a i 20 ft. boulevard area from the back of the curb and then the ten foot standard drainage utility easement along the property lines adjoining public right of ways. He added that as part of the replatting process, the City will be proceeding with the necessary notifications and hearings to vacate old and unused easements associated with the Northbrook Center Addition plat and the former Morgan Avenue corridor. Along with the replatting of the property, the City will be correcting improvements to the pedestrian walkways along 57 Avenue North as a continuation of the .Bass Lake Road streetscape improvements. Commissioner Rahn referenced a previous development that had been proposed to the site and asked if that had been a PUD proposal. Mr. Eitel referenced the previous Northbook Site Task Force and the City's request for development proposals which resulted in the Northbrook Village development concept for a mixed use commercial - residential development. This concept did not proceed beyond the FDA's initial development agreement and consequently was not formally reviewed by the Commission. Commissioner Parks asked for clarification about Hennepin County's memo regarding the site. Mr. Eitel responded that the County had stated that they would like the city to keep Lilac Drive as the main access on the site and they would like to see the other curb cuts along County Road 10 go away or be limited to only one. He added that they also addressed the right of way dedications and the need for future trail or highway easements. Page 2 • 2 -11 -2010 Commissioner Leino arrived at 7:44 Corn .m. p PUBLIC HEARING — APPLICATION NO. 2010 -002 EDA OF BROOKLYN CENTER There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Leino, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2010 -002, at 7:44 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Leino asked for clarification on what the title to the property would indicate. Mr. Eitel responded that this plat would vacate old easements, dedicate new easements and would be a 7.32 acre lot and a .86 acre outlot to facilitate future planning. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. No persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on Application No. 2010 -002. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2010 -002, at 7:48 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 2010 -002 EDA OF BROOKLYN CENTER There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner .Parks, to recommend to the City Council that it approve Application No. 2010 -002, submitted by EDA of Brooklyn Center subject to the following conditions: 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 (Platting) of the City Ordinances. 3. All drainage and utility easements recommended to be vacated by the City Engineer shall be vacated by ordinance amendment prior to final plat approval. 4. All easements required by the City Engineer for drainage and utility purposes shall be executed prior to final plat approval. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Kuykendall, Leino, and Parks. The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider this application at its February 22, 2010 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. . Page 3 2 -11 -2010 PREL /M /NARY PLAT j/ �/ r I > v' PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTES N Cenbe� N J_J� r / °x I SURVEYOR: OWNER/ ofBroo Brooklyn Center 2nd Addition ORTHBROOK CENTER 2ND ie " // -� Loucks Associates, Inc. City of Brooklyn ,o / / ✓ ✓' i 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway ADD /T /ON /e Maple Grove, MN 55330 Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 113 / /�y✓ /! j LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 through 6, Block 2, Northbrook Center Addition, Hennepin County, Broddyn Center, Minnesda Minnesota, together with that portion of Logan Avenue North, vacated as . , ' t I shown by Document No. 1740258, accruing thereto by reason of the vacation n. thereof. CaydBrooklyn Center /// / / / {/) / ,.•`�y= I` 4�•1, Hennepin County // �/! / t N r •✓ �„y. I' °g ' _' Torrens Property RRGaOSEO DED --CE AND UT — WENENrs SPA / fi /'/ / ��: !� �l; Torrens Certificate No. 1201107 ( PROP —D DRU E umm vAGnoN �// .i /�,G,Fsl OUtlot A DATE OF PREPARATION: �ROPO- oEDIGrION or Loco+ AVE - r July 29, 2009 P i/� <+ 37,074./- SF ! s' 0.85 + /- Ac BENCHMARK: ®PROPoSED OEOIGMIH M Benchmark Top Nut of the Hydrant located on the west side of Logan Ave at I _ - 425 the westerly extension of the southerly R -O -W line for 58th Ave, as shown f/b r- J _ hereon, elevation = 849.30 feet (city datum) AS90CIATM EXISTING ZONING: n... •aw N,a..y.rr,p,r ,/yg( / / / / / ICI I. C2(COMMERCE DISTRICT) '""" J, I PROPOSED ZONING: C2 (COMMERCE DISTRICT) v, ••' AREAS: Total Property Area = 370,648 + /- square feet or 8.49 +1- acres t 7 I I Right of wav Dedication Area = 14,364 + /- souare feet or 0.33 +1. acre ' p t it Net Property Area = 355,700 + /- square feet or 8.16 +l- acres *•�,_, 1 I dye r I 1 � I / Olsl/ g PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACKS: B /� ^,�' 12 t ,.✓ C Front = 35 Feet Ef.IP r I I I ^' .` Side (Corner) -25F t x �� Slde (interior) - 10 Feet = r ,p• R -F� I a Rear = 40 Feet .1 y a S FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: LOT 1 a z This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 2.0 r ,•P .� annual chance Oootl plain) per flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel / d 319210 + / - SF _ No. 27053CO216E, effective date of September 2, 2004. 1. ✓ ✓' \ 7.32./- Ac ais '.�..% 0 50 100 f1 NORTH S rxry IN PSBf RLS R RU. 6-1 / o %' ✓ i `` a �- ' t ~ _ � � ✓' `•_.✓^ A_ :✓� M .✓N 2i' - g( . DDw,ES RDN a..aE . F � � gn I� /r H \ `` \_ 1 �i I - _ ... Yl �NI I • n ow0 SURVEY LEGEND - EXISTING CONDITIONS / � i, � .✓'I . ✓'� ✓. � - - � - - - �s! I - � I \ I GTnH asses sroRR sEwt =RR i / 31 ... ..+� ✓' ,,e \�,, \ s" sroRa uo4laE - srartARV SERER .�' r Im I S7J• / / ,� - � s>, :� ,\ \ ,,.•' ✓- I w , ,� moo v�.. \ v I G3 } ✓ ` � f .+' � g z I e YNTER w,NHDIE —,...- N N ED RcROUNO EEECmx: slo+N THVS Imn. E 3 -• y . '' ✓ ,y, , N � ' a p MOR,Wi .s UNDERGROUND OAS IFS a� 27 6 _ n„ ,I' H I F I i £ 1 I as OAIE VKVE —._ ---ND TELEPHONE 4 Ir R 1C.—E PE FS K O ERHEAD i L Preli ai R P— o - _.CHUM — FENCE Pla POKE z C eMi — U lr POLE CONCRETE CURB _ t L�214. 98 D•fi 3J 09' n �E NORTH s NR:. .. SIGN .:CONCRETE o io " gg2 `w g R 18 9.86 `0 I 5Pm EUNAnoN caNlouR _ �•"; 'b •;: 50 18'E X214.87 SB9 56'I7'W 255.26 U— +f ti .s swim ox T,rt PUT nr,eTrs _ _ =_ y - — - -- �k� • N� „a.R ,a 0903 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 Of 1 NORTHBROOK CENTER 2ND ADDITION J R.T. DOC. No. / KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Economic Development Authority In And For The City Of Brooklyn Center,Minnesote, a Minnesota public body corporate and / politic, owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin. State of Minnesota, to wit: I / I / Lots 1 through 6, Block 2, NORTHROOK CENTER ADDITION, / And I That part of vacated Logan Avenue North in NORTHROOK CENTER ADDITION, dedicated in the plat of SPANJERS ADDITION, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast comer of eet Lot 6, Block 2, NORTHBROOK CENTER ADDITION, therKO North degrees 58 minutes 01 seconds East a distance 190.00 feet to the actual point of tie t ,nnirg, tlience deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 0.25 feet, thence North 0 degrees 58 minutes 01 seconds East a distance of 260.00 t. f, thence deflecOng to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds to a point of the Westerly night of way lure of Logan Avenue North, thence Southerly 260.00 feet along said I I right on way line to the point beginning. Has caused the same to be surveyetl and platted as NORTHBROOK CENTER 2ND ADDITION, and does hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the public / / i � JJ 37 I Way end the easements es shown on this plat for tlreinage end utility purposes. NORTH NOT TO SCALE F1 i I I -- In witness whereof said Economic Development Authority In And for The City Of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, a Minnesota public body Corporate and politc, has caused these 0 60 120 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE 1A / I I presents to be signed by its proper officers this day of 20 SHOWN THUS: 11 l / :,+�: I I I ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 145 SCALE IN FEET I I IS / Im ° I - = Tim Willson, President Cornelius Boganey, Exectutive Director —JL -- THE SOUTH UE OF THE SW 1/4, / _ State of Minnesota NE I/4, SEC Z TWP 118, RNG 21, IS / I l ipi County of UN ASSURED TO HAVE A BEARING OF BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, LESS OTHERWISE / <• r SOUTH 89'44'24" EAST. INDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND / I The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by Tim Willson, its President and by Cornelius Boganey, its BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE ^/�.�yy O DENOTES 1/2 IN X 14 INCH IRON INDICATED, AND ADJOINNG RIGHT -OF -WAY / / OWot A _ I I Executive Director, of Economic Development Authority In And For Me City Of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, a Minnesota public body corporate and politic, on behalf of the public MONUMENT SET, MARKED 'RLS LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. / I I body. 26724" • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND P. - DENOTES DISTANCES PER PLAT OF A-0'2825' m JJ � (Signed) NORTHBROOK CENTER ADDITION \, �-_— L -4798 — Sff9"3p'261r _ � I ' — J M. - DENOTES DISTANCES AS MEASURED — — — — — I •• •• Q-- - - - - - — � -- — —, NW - 42'18'W o (Printed) / I / �-p,25i Notary Public County, Minnesota � My Commission Expires 14` — • • a // y i I I SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION I, Richard L Licht, do hereby cersly that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this is a Correct representation of Me boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on the plat, that all monuments depicted on the plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year, that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 50501, Subd. 3, as of the dale of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat: and all public ways are shown and labeled on this Plat_ e It Dated this day of , 201 r - - -- Richard L. Licht, Licensed Land S or arvey Minnesota License No. 28724 / I I •� State of Minnesota County of Hennepin Lot � i I 1 I The foregoing Surveyors Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of , 201 by Richard L I icht, a Licensed Land Surveyor. BLOCK 1 J27S M (Signature) / I SM 42'1i e . .— .— .— .— .— . —. —. —. _ Printed Name) — .— .— ._._. —__ _ — .— .— . —. —._ — — _._.r JJ ( i Sa9 4 c Notary Public County, Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31, & U 201 — Drainage fAiry -- W r Nwlha Stotea li— Campony £ ant Pw pea Na 4989/6 - - -, I r ) Eo Ar f i �_� •,g h �, N \ 2 BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA s , ' 51.45 . . `\ `l. — .... \� < < 7 This plat of NORTHBROOK CENTER 2ND ADDITION was approved and accepted b the City Council of Broo Center, Minnesota, at regular meeting thereof held this ' 44 ' 24 ' E I ; x P PP P Y ty Y re9 9 5qj sea t a !ha PorvllN MM canter Lne Of 57th AK. N. I 8 S day of A.D. 20. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03, 990 D 1 •s I H ' Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA I — I H I I _ _ + By , Mayor By Manager r — — — — — — I AF' Car. Of let 6 - I I %•; TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Hennepin County, Minnesota \ • .. 0- L - I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 _N7a I N' ? I Jill L Alverson, Hennepin County Auditor I n 07 SW //4, NE l /4, s L'e fir. _2/4.9J 1- -- -�.I a- By .DeWl1' A VE, !_ �.7RISg dip jp, }--- _ - - - -_ 'E I /87486 — — tiT i v1. fast OumNr Cwnc O/ 5 Li • •• - .TO'SB �7Q7RAS 589'M 14 9794 I sac b q - :az4s Nr/a 32 E 67tlt - ; Am me K a p +E Nz / I mnmT c' 2/ ar ee Z his, / 2k y ' A •T \ i Al. Csetn Lna Of 57th A— N -, SH9'4424 E 255.J9 d � •� ,p § SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota M37B2 549'H'24'E /J7!$/ - 1' ' Pursuant to MINN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565 (1969) this plat has been approved this day of .20 - ti.' earner c Of ,.: Av e^ ::E c 0. rx. Sec. 2 f,rP fro Rnq 71 William P. Brown, Hennepin County Surveyor Fnd Hmnepm Ca G1.M. I JJ Ir By loll /AA I I REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota w I hereby certify that the within plat of NORTHBROOK CENTER 2ND ADDITION was filed in this of ice this _day of 20_ AsSOC I AT E S Michael H. Cunniff, Registrar of Titles • City Council Agenda Item No. 6e i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM • DATE: November 16, 2010 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development SUBJECT: Resolution Providing a Nine Month Extension to the Time Period for the Submittal of the Final Plat for the Northwest Family Service Center. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council, following consideration of this matter, approve the Resolution providing a nine month extension to the time period for submittal of the Northwest Family Service Center Final Plat Background: On April 24, 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2010 -75 Regarding the Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2010 -004 Submitted by Welsh Construction LLC, A Request for Preliminary Plat Approval of Northwest Family Service Center. This proposed subdivision involves the creation of a 3.9 acre lot for the planned development of a 63,362 sq.ft. addition to the existing Adult Education Building, located at 7051 Brooklyn Boulevard; improvements to the 71 St Ave and Brooklyn Boulevard intersection; and dedication of right of way to facilitate the realignment of 71 Ave. to enhance the residential street entrance to the adjoining neighborhood and access to the Willow Lane Early Childhood Learning Center. Attached for your reference is a copy of resolution approving the preliminary plat and items which need to be addressed and prepared in conjunction with the submittal of the final plat. The subdivision ordinance indentifies a six month time frame within which an applicant is required to submit a final plat; otherwise, the preliminary plat will be considered void unless an extension in writing by the subdivider and for good cause granted by the City Council. During this time frame, staff has had numerous meetings and conversations with the owners and their consultants on their construction schedule, issues relating to the financing, and structuring the ownership of portions of the building. Staff understands that these issues have added to the complexity of the completing the final plat with the necessary easements and documents that will be recorded as part of this development. Given the nature of the transportation improvements and the plans required to be submitted with the final P lat, staff is recommending that a nine month extension be granted, which extends the deadline for final plat submittal until July 24, 2011. Attached is a letter requesting a nine month extension with the explanation that the owners, CEAP and ISD 279, are working on finalizing the financing of the project before proceeding with the final plat. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Budget Issues: • There are no budget issues to consider with this request. Council Goals: Strategic: 1. Will aggressively proceed with implementation of the City's Redevelopment Plans 5. Will improve the image of the City with Citizens and those outside of the City's border. • i !fission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe cominunity that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and • moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROVIDING A NINE MONTH EXTENSION TO THE TIME PERIOD FOR SUBMITTAL OF THE NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICE CENTER FINAL PLAT. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on March 25, 2010 which was continued until April 12, 2010 at which time a staff report and public testimony regarding the preliminary plat of Northwest Family Service Center were received; and WHEREAS, the City Council On April 24, 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2010 -75 Regarding the Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2010 -004 Submitted by Welsh Construction LLC, A Request for Preliminary Plat Approval of Northwest Family Service Center, and WHEREAS, the City's subdivision ordinance requires the submittal of a final plat not later than six months after the date of approval of the preliminary plat; otherwise , the preliminary plat and final plat will be considered void unless an extension is requested in writing by the subdivider and for good cause granted by the City Council, WHEREAS, Welsh Construction has submitted a written request for a nine month extension to allow the owners to finalize the financing of the project before procceding with the final plat. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to approve a nine month time extension for the submittal of the Northwest Family Service Center Final Plat. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: is whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted WELSH November 2, 2011 Mr. Gary Eitel Director of Business & Development City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Re: Northwest Family Service Center Addition (CEAP) 7051 Brooklyn Boulevard Dear Mr. Eitel: Pursuant to our conversations regarding the above referenced project, we hereby formally request a nine month extension to the preliminary plat approval for the above referenced • project. The Owner has been working diligently to finalize the financing for the project, while they are very close, they still require more time. They wish to hold off on submitting the final plat until the financing is finalized. In an effort to remain consistent with City ordinances, we will require the extension to the preliminary plat approval. If you should have any' question, please contact me at 952- 897 -7862. Thank you, 0-0-0 Mike Schraad Vice President Welsh Construction, LLC • LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of l a .E b t wv 71STAVEN � I '521 S LU fe 'ter, a y °`�' � "�,�, � / � / /��%/ � ,\ y .$ • \\ �' I \\ 7DTHAVE N Wlllow Lane Park - - - � —' \\ r 70TH AVE N _ - - - A m t rn rn z z u rvcMS. {x 3ct.o so�axis o 24 01 Location Map Northwest Family Service Center i Member Kay Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -75 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2010 -004, A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICE CENTER WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2010 -004 submitted by the Welsh Construction, on behalf of LEAP, Inc. and Independent School District 279 requests Preliminary Plat approval of a subdivision, to be known as Northwest Family Service Center, a replat/consolidation of Lot 1, Block 1, Center Brookdale Addition (R -1 residence /vacant lot), Lot 4, Block 1, Replat of Block 2 Lang Addition (R -1 residence /vacant lot), and Lot 3, Block 1, Osseo Willow Lane Addition (C -1 Adult Ed Building) into a 3.9 acre lot with right of way dedications to facilitate improvements to the 71" Ave. North; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on March 25, 2010, which was continued until April 12, 2010, at which time a staff report and public testimony regarding the preliminary plat of Northwest Family Service Center were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Preliminary Plat is consistent with the General Development Plans of the Northwest Family Service Center Planned Unit • Development; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No. 2010 -004 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2010 -01; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered Application No. 2010 -004 at its April 26, 2010, meeting, considered the Preliminary Plat in light of all testimony received, and the Planning Commission's recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to approve Application No. 2010 -004 submitted by Welsh Construction in consideration of the following: 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer Department as outlined in their memo dated April 13, 2010. 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. i • RESOLUTION NO. 2010 - 75 3. Appropriate cross access agreement allowing access from the Willow Lane Early Childhood and Family Education Center, the Northwest Family Service Center, and the Willow Lane Apartments to the proposed Lot 3 shall be developed and filed with the plat. 4. The necessary drainage and utility easements within this Plat and the PUD Master Plan, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be dedicated and filed with the final plat. 5. Existing, but no longer necessary, easements shall be vacated by the City prior to release of the final plat. 6. Approval of the access improvements to the entrance onto Brooklyn Boulevard and the 71" Avenue signalized intersection by Hennepin County. 7. Approval of the 71 Avenue street realignment project by the City of Brooklyn Center. April 26, 2010 Date Mayor ATTEST: ��-- City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Tim Roche and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. Tim Willson, Kay Lasman, Tim Roche, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich;` and the following voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i City Council Agenda Item No. 6f • • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: November 17, 2010 • TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Kelli Wick, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: RESOLUTION SETTING 2011 EMPLOYER BENEFITS CONTRIBUTION FOR FULL -TIME NON -UNION EMPLOYEES Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider adoption of the attached resolution setting the 2011 employer benefits contribution for full -time non -union employees. Background: The City provides a cafeteria benefit plan which allows employees to purchase not only their medical insurance but other insurances provided by the City including dental, supplemental and dependent life, and long and short term disability. The City participates in the LOGIS health care consortium. The consortium allows member cities to pool together their purchasing power when going out for bid for health and life insurance. Our current insurance provider is HealthPartners. Annually the City receives the premium increase for health insurance coverage from the LOGIS . group. For 2011 the group received a 10.22% increase. For 2011 the single health insurance premiums range from $484 to $735 as compared to the 2010 rates of $439 to $666. 2011 family premiums range from $1,275 to $1,935 as compared to the 2010 rates of $1,157 - $1,755. The city reviewed the city benefit contribution and various scenarios in offering the benefit contribution that would enable employees to maximize their benefit dollars and to continue to provide an incentive to assist employees in making a change to a high deductible plan. The City's high deductible plans provide either a health savings account or a health reimbursement account which allows the employee to save with pre -tax dollars for current and/or future health care expenses. The high deductible plans also have considerably lower premiums. Employees who participate in high deductible health plans tend to be better health care consumers as they are responsible for some out of pocket expenses (preventative visits are always covered at 100 %.) We are hopeful that with continuing efforts of better consumerism the results will affect and lower our claims experience, which in turn affects our rates. In order to achieve the goal of better health care consumerism from our employees we are proposing a $32 per month increase to the benefit contribution and a $40 per month increase to the incentive for those employees electing to participate in a high deductible health plan. These increases will pay 29% - 66% of the average increase for the medical premiums depending on the medical plan the employee is electing. It is recor.n mended that the City Council consider adoption of the attached resolution setting the 2011 employer benefits contribution for full -time non -union employees. The total recommended • employer benefits contribution for 2011 is $890 per month (2010 amount was $858.) Those - Vission: Ensuring an attractive. clean, safe commani(v that enhances the quality q 'life and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM electing a high deductible health plan will receive an $80 per month incentive (20 10 amount was $40.) . Budget Issues: The increase of $32 per month to the cafeteria benefit plan and the increase of $40 to the incentive would result in a maximum increase of $137,376. Sufficient funds are available in the general fund of the proposed 2011 budget. Council cil Goals: Ongoing: 1. We will provide streamlined, cost effective, quality services with limited resources • : fission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe commanity that enhances the quality of'tife and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION SETTING 2011 EMPLOYER BENEFITS CONTRIBUTION FOR FULL -TIME NON -UNION EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, the City Council annually reviews the benefit contribution that is used to provide insurance benefit assistance to City employees; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed its contribution to assist in the payment of health insurance premiums and determined that an increase in the City's contribution for 2011 is warranted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the City's contribution for regular, full -time non -union City employees for the calendar year 2011 shall be set at $890.00 per month including the cost of $10,000 in life insurance coverage. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that an incentive of $80 per month shall be provided to all regular, full -time non -union City employees electing to participate in a high deductible health plan. November 22, 2010 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i, City Council Agenda Item No. 6g • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: November 17, 2010 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Kevin Benner, Chief of Police' SUBJECT: Safe & Sober / Operation NightCAP grants Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution to continue the grant partnership with the State of Minnesota on the Safe & Sober and Operation NightCAP projects. Background: The Brooklyn Center Police Department has applied to enter into a grant agreement between the State of Minnesota -- Commissioner of Public Safety, State Patrol Division -- for the projects entitled Safe & Sober and NightCAP. The grant period runs from December 1, 2010, through September 30, 2011. The grant monies would be dedicated to pay officers' overtime for traffic safety initiatives and is not to exceed $5,500.00. There is no matching requirement for the grant contract. • Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Council Goals: Strategic: 1. We will ensure a safe and secure community Ongoing: 1. We will provide streamlined, cost effective, quality services with limited resources i Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life andpreserves thepublic trust I Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO ENTER INTO A GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA STATE PATROL WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center wishes to enter into the Agreement with the Minnesota State Patrol in grant programs which run from December 1, 2010, to September 30, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota State Patrol is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the Brooklyn Center Police Department; and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota is hereby authorized to be the fiscal agent and administer the grants on behalf of the Brooklyn Center Police Department; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has entered into previous grants to provide increased traffic enforcement and educational activities for the following programs: Safe & Sober and Operation NightCAP; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered this matter and believe it to be in the best interests of the City to enter into the grant agreement with the Minnesota State Patrol • to provide enhanced traffic enforcement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the grant agreement and subsequent transactions are hereby approved and adopted, and that the Chief of Police or his designee is authorized and directed to execute such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the grant in the name and on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center in the form approved by this resolution. November 22, 2010 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: • whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item No. 6h • • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM • DATE: November 18, 2010 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk ✓�' SUBJECT: Calling for a Public Hearing to be Held December 13, 2010, on the Proposed Denial of an On -Sale Class C Intoxicating Liquor License for AMF Earle Brown Lanes, 6440 James Circle North Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council call for a Public Hearing to be held December 13, 2010, on the proposed denial of an On -Sale Class C Intoxicating Liquor License for AMF Earle Brown Lanes, 6440 James Circle North. Background: On November 8, 2010, AMF Earle Brown Lanes, 6440 James Cir. N, submitted a renewal liquor license application for a Class C On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. After review of the license application packet, it has been determined that AMF Earle Brown Lanes does not meet the requirements of City Ordinance Section 11- 107.4.c relating to the 40% to 49% revenue derived from the serving of food. The data submitted by AMF shows that only 34% of sales are derived from food. Section 11- 107.4.c reads: 11 -107.4 On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. A Restaurant must have a dining room that is open to the general public, with a total minimum floor area of 1,800 square feet and seat not less than 150 guests at one time in order to obtain an On- Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. The following are the classes of On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses that may be issued by the City: c. On -Sale Class C Intoxicating Liquor License. A Hotel or Restaurant that has 40% to 49% of its applicable revenue derived from the serving of food for consumption on the Premises and derives a considerable part of its revenue from sources other than Liquor or food is eligible for a Class C license. It is our understanding that the applicant wishes to schedule a discussion of this matter with the City Council at a Work Session, prior to Council taking action on its renewal application. If we receive additional information from the applicant warranting a Work Session review, we would ask the City Council to schedule this item for Work Session discussion. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of lift, and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. • Council Goals: Ongoing: 1. We will provide streamlined, cost effective, quality services with limited resources i Mission: Ensuring an attractive., clean, safe communh) that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust Ci ty g Council Agenda Item No. 7a COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: November 10, 2010 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Expressing Recognition and Appreciation of JoAnn Campbell - Sudduth for Her Dedicated Public Service on the Planning Commission Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider adoption of Resolution Expressing Recognition and Appreciation of JoAnn Campbell- Sudduth for Her Dedicated Public Service on the Planning Commission. Background: JoAnn Campbell- Sudduth served on the Planning Commission from May 11, 2009, through November 9, 2010. Mayor Willson has requested that residents be recognized for their service on commissions by Council Resolution. Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. i :Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean., safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO._______________ RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION AND APPRECIATION OF JOANN CAMPBELL-SUDDUTH FOR HER DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, JoAnn Campbell-Sudduth served on the Planning Commission from May 11, 2009, through November 9, 2010; and WHEREAS, JoAnn Campbell-Sudduth has made significant contributions as a member of the Planning Commission, including review of land use, redevelopment, platting, rezoning and special use applications, plan approval, variances, and review of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, her leadership and expertise have been greatly appreciated by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, her public service and civic effort for the betterment of the community merit the gratitude of the citizens of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that her service to the community should be recognized and expressed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that JoAnn Campbell-Sudduth is hereby recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center, and this resolution serves as a visible and lasting expression of gratitude for the leadership and service she has rendered to the citizens of Brooklyn Center. November 22, 2010 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item No. 10a COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: November 22, 2010 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk J - SUBJECT: Type IV 6 -Month Provisional Rental License for 5603 Bryant Ave N. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the issuance of a Type IV 6 -Month Provisional Rental License and mitigation plan for 5603 Bryant Ave N. If the Council chooses to not issue the license, it is recommended that the motion be to direct staff to prepare proposed findings for denial of the rental license and draft said resolution for the next Council meeting. Background: This owner is applying for a renewal rental license. This property qualifies for a Type IV provisional rental license based on the number of property code violations found during the initial rental license inspection (five property code violations) and validated police incidents /nuisance calls (two calls) for the past 12 months. The property qualified for a Type III license based on property code violations, and decreased one category to a Type IV due to the number of validated police incidents /nuisance calls. Staff from Administration, Building & Community Standards and Police Departments worked with the property owner regarding a mitigation plan, which requires Phase I, II and III of the Crime Free Housing Program, and other items included by City ordinance for a Type IV License. A Mitigation Plan has been developed addressing the requirements of the ordinance and any issues specific to the property. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the Type IV Rental License on condition of adherence to the Mitigation Plan. Please refer to the attached copy of the Mitigation Plan for more information. The following is a brief history of the license process actions: 06 -22 -10 Michael Skrogstad applied for renewal of the rental dwelling license for 5603 Bryant Ave N, a single - family residential property. 06 -29 -10 Initial rental inspection conducted (Five orders cited, see attached rental criteria) 07 -29 -10 Second rental inspection passed 07 -29 -10 Two validated police incident/nuisance calls occurred in the past 12 months- one shooting on May 7, 2010 and one narcotics violation on August 24, 2010. 10 -20 -10 Letter to owners notifying of qualification for Type IV 6 -Month Provisional Rental License, including additional requirements to obtain a rental license (submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases I, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc.) 11 -05 -10 Letter sent to owner notifying past due on additional requirements of Type IV 6- Month Provisional Rental License (submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases I, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc.) 11 -09 -10 Mitigation Plan approved Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM If approved, after six months, a new rental license will be required. The license process will begin in approximately four months. The new license will be based on the property code violations found durin g P the initial renewal license inspection and the number of validated police calls for services for disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in 12 -911. The terms of the mitigation plan must also be met. Excerpt from Chapter 12 of City Code of Ordinances: Section 12 -913. TYPE IV PROVISIONAL LICENSES. 1. Rental properties that meet the provisional licensing criteria as described in Section 12- 901 are eligible only for provisional licenses. 2. The City will provide by mail to each licensee a monthly report of any police and fire calls and incidents and applicable property Code violations as described in Section 12- 901. 3. Mitigation Plan. The applicant for a provisional license must submit for Council review a mitigation plan for the license period. The mitigation plan shall describe steps proposed by the applicant to reduce the number of police and fire calls and/or the property Code issues described in Section 12 -901 and 12 -911 to a level that qualifies for a Type I, II, or III license. The mitigation plan may include such steps as changes in tenant screening procedures, changes in lease terms, security measures, rules and regulations for tenant conduct, security personnel, and time frame to implement all • phases of the Crime Free Housing Program. 4. Council Consideration. The application with a proposed mitigation plan will be presented to the City Council together with a recommendation by the City Manager or the Manager's designee as to the disposition thereof. After giving the applicant an opportunity to be heard and present evidence, the Council shall approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions the application and the mitigation plan. If the Council disapproves an application and mitigation plan or approves it with conditions, it shall state its reasons for so doing in writing. In evaluating a mitigation plan, the Council will consider, among other things, the facility, its management practices, the nature and seriousness of causes for police and fire incidences and/or property Code issues and the expected effectiveness of measures identified in the plan to reduce the number of police and fire incidences and/or property Code violations. In evaluating a mitigation plan submitted by an applicant already under a provisional license, the Council will also consider the effectiveness of measures identified in the applicant's previous mitigation plan and the need for different or additional measures to reduce police and fire incidences and/or property Code violations. 5. Compliance with Mitigation Plan. The licensee shall comply with the mitigation plan as approved or modified by the Council. No later than the tenth day after each calendar month, the licensee shall mail or deliver to the City Manager a written report describing all steps taken in furtherance of the mitigation plan during the preceding month. • Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Rental License Category Criteria Policy — Adopted by City Council 03 -08 -10 1. Determining License Categories. License categories are based on property code and nuisance violations noted during the initial or renewal license inspection or for a category verification inspection, along with excessive validated police service calls occurring over a year. License categories are performance based and more accurately depict the condition of the property and the City costs of service. 2. Fees. Fee amounts are determined by the costs of the city to license, inspect, monitor and work with the property to ensure category conditions are met. License fees do not include reinspection fees, late fees, charges for criminal or civil enforcement actions, or other penalties. 3. Category Conditions. The licensee or designated agent must meet the category conditions in the time period specified by the City. A licensee must meet all original conditions required by the License Category, even if a subsequent license category is achieved. 4. License Category Criteria. • a. Property Code and Nuisance Violations. Property code violation rates will be based on the average number of property code violations per unit identified during the licensing inspection or category verification inspection. Property code violations for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include violations of property code and nuisances as defined in Chapter 12, 19, 7 and other applicable local ordinances. The City may, upon complaints or reasonable concerns that the establishment no longer complies with the license category criteria, perform a category verification inspection to the same standards as the license renewal inspection as indicated below. Inspections will be conducted in conjunction with established department policies. In cases where 100% of the units are not inspected, the minimum inspection standards will be established as follows: • At least 75% of units will be inspected for properties with 15 or less units. • At least 25% of units, to include a minimum of 12 units, will be inspected for properties with 16 or more units. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category Number of Units Property Code Violations per (Based on Property Inspected Unit Code Only) Type I — 3 Year 1 -2 units 0 -1 3+ units 0 -0.75 Type II — 2 Year 1 -2 units Greater than 1 but not more than 4 3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III — 1 Year 1 -2 units Greater than 4 but not more than 8 3 +1units Greater than 1.5 but not mote than 3 Type IV — 6 Months 1 -2 units Greater than 8 3+ units Greater than 3 b. Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12 -911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are "Family or household members" as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of "Domestic Abuse" as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 51813.01, Subd. 2 (a). License Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Category Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category 1 -2 0 -1 Impact 3 -4 units 0 -0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 1 -2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 Category 3 -4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 1 -2 Greater than 3 Categories 3 -4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 • Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Council Goals: Strategic: We will ensure a safe and secure community We will stabilize and improve residential neighborhoods Attachment - Mitigation Plan Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust • City of Brooklyn Center Phone. • 763 -569 -3300 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 7TY/Voice711 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 Fax- 763 -569 -3494 www.cityo,tbFooklyncenter.org EmWk Rental License Mitigation Plan (Type IV License) Handwritten plans will not be accepted Please type or use finable form on City websile Property Address: 5603 Bryant Avenue North Owner Name: Michael Skrogstad Local Agent: Brenton Hayden Owner Address: Agent Address: 5205 Baker Road, Minnetonka, MN 55343 715 Florida Avenue South, Suite 205, Gowen vauey, MN 55426 Owner Phone: 612 805 5925 Agent Phone: 952 470 8888 Owner Email: skrog7 @comeast.net Agent Email: brenton@renterswarehouse.com The above referenced property qualifies for a Type IV Rental License. A Mitigation Plan must be completed and reviewed by City staff before the rental license application can be considered for approval by City Council. A Mitigation Plan should indicate the steps being taken to correct identified violations and the measures that will be taken to ensure ongoing compliance with City Ordinances and applicable Codes. The Mitigation Plan provides an opportunity to review property concems and identify possible solutions to improve the overall conditions of the ro Sectioe X- - 7 Required Documents Submit the following documents with the Mitigation Plan for approval: F E 1. Crime Free Housing Program Training Certificate F '772. Copy of Lease including Minnesota Crime Free Housing Lease Addendum 3. Signed & Completed Mitigation Plan F-714. Security Assessment Report (Performed by the Brooklyn Center Police Department) 5. Submit written report by 10'" of each month (after license approval). Sectioa B Crime Free Honsi P . ram Requireinests Phase I 1. Use written lease including Crime Free Housing Lease Addendum. 2. Conduct criminal background check for all prospective tenants. Provide documentation to City ifrequested. 3. Pursue the eviction of tenants who violate the terms of the lease or any addendums. 4. Attend City approved eight hour Crime Free Housing course. I Date Course Completed: 07/27/2010 Date Course Scheduled: Phase H r -17-1 Complete Security Assessment and implement all security improvements recommended by the Brooklyn Center Police Department. Date Completed: 11/08/2010 Im rovements to be completed by: 12/01/2010 Page 1 Type IV Mitigation Plan 9 -10 Phase 111 �`'� T will attend a minimum of 50% of the ARM meetings (four). { M► 1 I will attend the ARM meetings scheduled for: 01114120 & 111181201q 0 1. will have no repeat code violations previously documented within the past Year. For propeMes wish four or more ueeits: I wil I conduct resident training annually that includes crime prevention techniques. I will hold regular resident meetings. Section C -- Lon "berm Ca ftal Improvements Plan Future Date Last Replaced lacemcat Date Furnace /AC 0810112008 Water Heater 0810112008 Kitchen, Appliances Q8115008 Latutdr Appliances 0812012008 Exterior ftint/Siding 0710112012 Windows wolwi7 - Roof 06/01120115 -Fence - Shed -Garage - Garage _Mveway Sidewalks 0eroV2010 Smoke Alarms & Carlson Monoxide Alarms 0810 7/20178 Other: Seetka D — Steps to Im grove lMiana ement and Conditions of Pro perty Implementing the following best practices may assist in the management of your property. By checking the boxes below, you agree to: 0 Check in with tenants every 30 days. Drive by property to check for violations twice a month. EZJ Evict tenants in violation of the lease and all addendums. Provide lawn /snow service. Provide garbage service. Install security system. Provide maintenance service plan for appliances. Name of service company: Other: Page 2 Type IV Mitigation Flan 9 -10 • If the Type IV Rental License is approved by the City Council, the Licensee must comply with the approved Mitigation Plan and all applicable city codes. No later than the I W of each calendar month., the licensee must submit to the Building and Community Standards Department a written report describing all steps taken to comply with the Mitigation Plan. I verity that all information provided above is true and accurate. I understand that if I do not comply with an approved Mitigation Plan, enforcement actions such as citation, formal complaint or license review may result l A� " - Owner or Agent Signature / Title Date Additional Owner or Agent Signature / Title Date (If applicable) Police Department / Title Date Builo g & Community Standards Department / Title Date Page 3 Type IV Mitigation Plan 9 -10 City Council Agenda Item No. lOb 3 City of Brooklyn Center • City Council Agenda Item Memorandum TO: Curt Boganey, City Ma FROM: Daniel Jordet, Director of Fiscal & Support Services DATE: 17 November 2010 SUBJECT: Utility Rates for 2011 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider the five attached resolutions setting rates for consumption and use of City provided utility services for the 2011 fiscal year. Background: During the 1 November 2010 working session of the City Council and Financial Commission, staff presented the expected costs for operation of the City's utility services for 2011. Along with those costs were projections of the revenues needed for the 2011 year and for future years to keep operations running smoothly and fund the infrastructure improvements needed in the system. For 2011, higher rate increases were originally projected in order to maintain cash reserves and fund infrastructure improvements, operational savings and reductions in capital spending resulting from lower prices on construction have resulted in lower rates of increase for all utilities in 2011. The following base rate recommendations have been presented for the City's various utility services: Water: 4.00% increase (originally projected at 5.00 %) Sewer: 3.00% increase (originally projected at 4.00 %) Storm Sewer: 1.00% increase (originally projected at 3.00 %) Street Lights: 3.00% increase (originally projected at 4.00 %) Recycling: 2.00% increase (originally projected at 3.00 %) Financial Impact: Adopting the recommended rates for the five City utilities would produce the • following changes in a quarterly residential bill using 18,000 gallons of water in a quarter: Quarterly Quarterly ,Bill Bill quarterly 2010 2011 change Water $ 25.76 $ 26.74 $ 0.98 Sanitary Sewer $ 63.87 $ 65.79 $ 1.92 Stormwater $ 14.33 $ 14.48 $ 0.15 Streetlight _....._: . _ 384 $. 3.95 $ 0.11 Recycling $ 8.27 $ 8.43 $ 0.16 ;x$116.07 $119.391 $ 3.32; • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2011 WATER UTILITY RATES, FEES AND CHARGES WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center Charter requires that municipal utilities be self - supporting through revenue provided by a uniform schedule of rates, fees and charges; and WHEREAS, this uniform schedule shall be called the "Public Utility Rate Schedule" and shall be adopted by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, financial requirements for the utility funds have been identified and reviewed by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the following Water Utility rates, fees and charges are hereby adopted and shall be effective for all billings issued on or after January 1, 2011. 2011 WATER UTILITY RATE SCHEDULE Water Rates, Fees and Charges Base Rate Year 2011 $1.40 per 1,000 Gallons Quarterly Minimum Rate Meter Size 2011 Quarterly Minimum Charge 1" $ 19.60 1 /z" $ 25.20 2" $ 49.00 3" $ 98.00 4 55 $ 165.20 65 $ 378.00 8" $ 714.00 10" $ 952.00 Water Conservation Rate Meter Size Base Charge (per quarter) 5/8" and 3/4" $ 6.76 Thousands of Gallons Consumption Charge (per 1,00 gallons used) 0to30 $1.11 31 to 60 $ 1.39 61 and greater $ 2.09 RESOLUTION NO. Other Charges Delinquent account, quarterly charge Greater of $ 3.00 or 10% of unpaid balance Certification for collection with property $30.00 taxes November 22, 2010 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. . RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2011 SEWER UTILITY RATES, FEES AND CHARGES WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center Charter requires that municipal utilities be self - supporting through revenue provided by a uniform schedule of rates, fees and charges; and WHEREAS, this uniform schedule shall be called the "Public Utility Rate Schedule" and shall be adopted by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, financial requirements for the utility funds have been identified and reviewed by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the following Sewer Utility rates, fees and charges are hereby adopted and shall be effective for all billings issued on or after January 1, 2011. 2011 SEWER UTILITY RATE SCHEDULE Sewer Rates, Fees and Charges Base Rate Quarterly Residential Single Family Apartment Senior Citizen Year 2011 $ 65.79 $ 46.05 $ 36.18 Non - Residential Rate Year 2010 $ 2.65 per 1,000 Gallons • Fees SAC Charge set by MCES Fee Established by MCES Charges Delinquent account, quarterly charge Greater of $3.00 or 10% of unpaid balance Certification for collection with property taxes $30.00 Line cleaning charge Labor, materials, equipment and overhead Sanitary Sewer Connection Established annually by resolution November 22, 2010 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. • RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2011 STORM SEWER UTILITY RATES, FEES AND CHARGES WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center Charter requires that municipal utilities be self- supporting through revenue provided by a uniform schedule of rates, fees and charges; and WHEREAS, this uniform schedule shall be called the "Public Utility Rate Schedule" and shall be adopted by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, financial requirements for the utility funds have been identified and reviewed by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the following Storm Sewer Utility rates and charges are hereby adopted and shall be effective for all billings, issued on or after January 1, 2011. 2011 STORM SEWER UTILITY RATE SCHEDULE Storm Sewer Rates and Charges Quarterly Rates per Acre 2011 Quarterly Charge Base Rate $ 57.90 Cemeteries and Golf Courses $ 14.48 Parks $ 28.95 • Single Family, Duplex, Townhouse $ 14.48/lot School, Government Buildings $ 72.38 Multiple Family, Churches $ 173.70 Commercial, Industrial $ 289.50 Vacant Land As Assigned Charges Delinquent account, quarterly charge Greater of $3.00 or 10% of unpaid balance Certification for collection with property taxes $30.00 Private facility cleaning charge Labor, materials, equipment and overhead November 22, 2010 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2011 STREET LIGHT RATES AND CHARGES WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center Charter requires that municipal utilities be self - supporting through revenue provided by a uniform schedule of rates, fees and charges; and WHEREAS, this uniform schedule shall be called the "Public Utility Rate Schedule" and shall be adopted by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, financial requirements for the utility funds have been identified and reviewed by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the following Street Light Utility rates and charges are hereby adopted and shall be effective for all billings issued on or after January 1, 2011. 2011 STREET LIGHT UTILITY RATE SCHEDULE Street Light Rates and Charges Quarterly Rates Customer 2011 Quarterly Charge Per Dwelling Unit: Single, Double and Multiple Family Residential $ 3.95 g p Y Per Acre: • Parks $ 6.58 Schools, Government Buildings, Churches $ 13.16 Retail and Service - Office $ 19.75 Commercial and Industrial $ 19.75 Vacant Land and Open Space As Assigned Charges Delinquent account, quarterly charge Greater of $ 3.00 or 10% of unpaid balance Certification for collection with property taxes $ 30.00 November 22, 2010 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2011 RECYCLING RATE WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is a member of the Hennepin Recycling Group (HRG), which is a joint powers group organized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 (1987); and WHEREAS, the purpose of the joint powers agreement is to create an organization by which member cities may jointly and cooperatively provide for the efficient and economical collection, recycling and disposal of solid waste within and without their respective corporate boundaries in compliance with the Minnesota Waste Management Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 115A (1987); and WHEREAS, the HRG has established a curbside recycling program for its member cities to meet the requirements of Hennepin County Ordinance No. 13, Solid Waste Source Separation for Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, the HRG invoices the City of Brooklyn Center for the cost of recycling serviced based on a per household rate; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center must establish rates to fund the City's curbside recycling program and the cost for projected reimbursement of recycling charges from the HRG along with other program operating charges; and • WHEREAS, Brooklyn Center Ordinance No. 89 -11 authorizes the City to establish rates for recycling services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the per household recycling rate charge shall be $ 8.43 per quarter for all billings issued on or after 1 January 2011. November 22, 2010 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. AGENDA CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION November 22, 2010 Immediately Following Regular City Council and EDA Meetings Which Start at 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers City Hall A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary. ACTIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Discussion of Grant Funds, Capital Improvement Funds, Police Forfeiture Fund, TIF 2, 3, and 4, and Infrastructure Construction 2. TIF Options for Shingle Creek Crossings 3. AMF Bowling Centers Inc. Liquor License Status PENDING LIST FOR FUTURE WORK SESSIONS Later/Ongoing 1. Junk and Inoperable Vehicles Update—Back Yard Parking-December 13, 2010 2. Centennial Request- EBHC 3. Sister City Update 4. Strategic Outcome Reports 5. 2011 Brooklyn Center Celebration Update 6. Neighborhood Designations 7. Minn. Stat. 273.128 4d Rental Properties—Annual Report—January 8. Department Year End Reports 9. Active Living Program 10. Community Schools Update 11. Hwy 252 update—February 12. Graduated Sanitary Utility Rate Study 13. Garbage Hauler Organized Collection Update 14. Housing Improvement Association draft procedures 15. Joint meeting with Commissions Work Session Agenda Item No. I 2011 Budget Review City Council Work Session 22 November 2011 Police Forfeiture Fund page 1 City Initiatives Grant Fund page 7 TIF District # 2 Fund page 15 TIF District # 3 Fund page 19 TIF District # 4 Fund page 23 Capital Improvements Fund page 27 Infrastructure Construction Fund page 31 City of(Brook)n Center 2011 (Budget FUND: Fund—20500 DEPT/ACTIVITY/PROJECT: Police Forfeiture Fund—42190 PROFILE This find was established to account for receipts and disbursements related to drug forfeited vehicles, equipment and cash as well as DUI forfeitures of vehicles. This fund permits the City to carry a balance from year to year and expend funds upon approval for items and services that may be necessary to continue the City's effort to curtail drug activities and DUI in the community. Budgets of$24,000 in Forfeitures and $ 15,000 in DUI Forfeitures are reflected and are our best estimates of the level of activity anticipated for calendar year 2011. When fiends are appropriation requests will be made of the City Council. PERSONNEL LEVELS No personnel are assigned to this activity. CAPITAL OUTLAY None requested. 1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 20500 POLICE FORFEITURE FUND 42190 POLICE FORFEITURE FUND 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 4001 REVENUES 4300 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4340 STATE REVENUE 4359 OTHER STATE GRANTS/AID 852- 4340 STATE REVENUE 852- 4360 COUNTY GRANTS 4370 OTHER GRANTS/AID 4300 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 852- 4500 FINES&FORFEITS 4505 FEDERAL FORFEITURE REVENUE 5,090- 17,974- 12,000- 12,000- 4506 STATE FORFEITURE REVENUE 27,019- 17,775- 7,979- 12,000- 12,000- 4500 FINES&FORFEITS 27,019- 22,865- 25,952- 24,000- 24,000- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4603 INTEREST EARNINGS 145- 280- 69- 4605 UNREALIZED INVESTMENT GAIN/LOS 35- 7- 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 180- 287- 69- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 180- 287- 69- 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 4921 REFUNDS&REIMBURSEMENTS 5,137- 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 5,137- 4001 REVENUES 33,188- 23,152- 26,022- 24,000- 24,000- 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 6199 SUPPLIES 6200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 6214 CLOTHING&PERSONAL EQUIPMENT 2,646 884 6219 GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES 18,682 8,000 8,000 6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 21,328 884 8,000 8,000 6220 REPAIR&MAINT SUPPLIES 6240 SMALL TOOLS&MINOR EQUIPMENT 6242 MINOR EQUIPMENT 269 7,499 6,724 11,000 11,000 6240 SMALL TOOLS&MINOR EQUIPMENT 269 7,499 6,724 11,00D 11,000 6199 SUPPLIES 269 28,826 7,609 19,000 19,000 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6307 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 702 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 702 6320 COMMUNICATIONS 2 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 6330 TRANSPORTATION 6350 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 6400 REPAIR&MAINT SERVICES 6410 RENTALS 6412 BLDGS/FACILITIES 125 6416 MACHINERY 8,459 7,754 6421 SOFTWARE LICENSE 9,568 6410 RENTALS 8,459 7,878 9,568 6430 MISCELLANEOUS 6432 CONFERENCES AND SCHOOLS 3,709 3,000 3,000 6430 MISCELLANEOUS 3,709 3,000 3,000 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 6449 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICE 4,793 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 4,793 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 13,252 7,876 13,979 3,000 3,000 6500 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6501 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 13,520 36,705 21,588 22,000 22,000 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 19,667- 13,553 4,433- 2,000- 2,000- 42190 POLICE FORFEITURE FUND 19,667- 13,553 4,433- 2,000- 2.000- CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 42193 DUI FORFEITURE FUND 4001 REVENUES 4300 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4340 STATE REVENUE 4359 OTHER STATE GRANTS/AID 1,391- 45- 4340 STATE REVENUE 1,391- 45- 4300 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,391- 45- 4500 FINES&FORFEITS 4506 STATE FORFEITURE REVENUE 6,293- 26,446- 16,445- 15,000- 15,000- 4500 FINES&FORFEITS 6,293- 26,446- 16,445- 15,000- 15,000- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4603 INTEREST EARNINGS 16- 117- 80- 4605 UNREALIZED INVESTMENT GAIN/LOS 3- 5- 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 19- 123- 80- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 19- 123- 80 49DO OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 4001 REVENUES 6,312- 27,959- 16,570- 15,000- 15,000- 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 6199 SUPPLIES 6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 6240 SMALL TOOLS&MINOR EQUIPMENT 6242 MINOR EQUIPMENT 5,256 8,013 9,000 9,000 62.4D SMALL TOOLS&MINOR EQUIPMENT 5,256 8,013 9,000 9,000 6199 SUPPLIES 5,256 8,013 9,000 9,000 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6320 COMMUNICATIONS 6400 REPAIR&MAINT SERVICES 6430 MISCELLANEOUS 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 6447 TOWING CHARGES 3,157 6,142 3,265 6,000 6,000 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 3,157 6,142 3,265 6,000 6,000 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 3,157 6,142 3,265 6,000 6,000 6500 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6501 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 8,413 14,154 3,265 15,000 15,000 42193 DUI FORFEITURE FUND 2,102 13,805- 13,305- 4 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 20500 POLICE FORFEITURE FUND 17,566- 252- 17,739- 2,000- 2,000- 5 This page has been left blank intentionally. 6 City of Brook&n Center 2011 Budget FUND: Fund—28600 DEPT/DIVISION/ACTIVITY: Auto Theft Grant—42187 COPS Grant—42188 Recreation Grants—45020 PROFILE This fund was established to account for grants received from federal, state and other agencies where accounting for funds received and expended must be separate from other funds. This fund provides detail accounting required for theses funds without commingling these activities within the General Fund or other funds. Generally, these grants are for specific functional areas such as Police, Fire, Trails, etc. where the granting agency has required a separate accounting for amounts received and amounts disbursed. The budget reflects our best estimate of the level of activity anticipated for calendar year 2011. There are three division tracking grants expected during the 2011 fiscal year: 42187 Auto Theft Grant This grant will mature at the end of June 2011. Proceeds will be used to fund the wages and benefits of a police officer assigned to work on reducing the hazard of auto theft in Brooklyn Center. 42188 COPS Grant In this second full year of three years for this grant, this will assist in funding a juvenile specialist officer position. This grant funding runs through June of 2012. 45020 Recreation Grants This division tracks the various activity grants received by the Recreation programs as well as contributions from various donors. Establishment of this division assures that donations do not get absorbed back into the General Fund operations at the end of a fiscal year. PERSONNEL LEVELS Personnel are assigned to these activities only if grant funds are first obtained for expenditure. CAPITAL OUTLAY None requested. 7 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 42187 AUTO THEFT GRANT 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 4001 REVENUES 4300 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4340 STATE REVENUE 4359 OTHER STATE GRANTS/AID 74,797- 66,385 77,269- 58,453- 38,634- 38,634- 4340 STATE REVENUE 74,797- 66,385- 77,269- 58,453- 38,634- 38,634- 4400 CHARGES FOR SERVICES-GENERAL 4300 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 74,797- 66,385- 77,269- 58,453- 38,634 38,634 4001 REVENUES 74,797- 66,385- 77,269- 58,453- 38,634 38,634- 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 6101 WAGES&SALARIES-FT EMPLOYEES 48,845 46,517 61,979 38,694 29,913 29,913 6102 OVERTIME-FT EMPLOYEES 1,321 1,784 1,181 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 50,166 48,301 61,979 39,875 29,913 29,913 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 6123 PERA POLICE&FIRE PLAN 6,471 6,777 8,739 5,622 4,218 4,218 6126 MEDICARE CONTRIBUTIONS 766 713 899 598 434 434 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 7,237 7,490 9,638 6,220 4,652 4,652 6130 INSURANCE BENEFITS 6131 CAFETERIA PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS 7,058 6,347 10,800 8,314 5,640 5,640 6130 INSURANCE BENEFITS 7,058 6,347 10,800 8,314 5,640 5,640 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 6151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE 2,034 2,590 2,585 1,776 1,346 1,346 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 2,034 2,590 2,585 1,776 1,346 1,346 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 66,495 64,727 85,002 56,184 41,551 41,551 6199 SUPPLIES 6200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 6214 CLOTHING&PERSONAL EQUIPMENT 135 109 6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 135 109 6240 SMALL TOOLS&MINOR EQUIPMENT 6242 MINOR EQUIPMENT 1,768 5,743 6243 MINOR COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 337 6240 SMALL TOOLS&MINOR EQUIPMENT 2,104 5,743 6199 SUPPLIES 2,239 109 5,743 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6320 COMMUNICATIONS 6321 TELEPHONE/PAGERS 490 499 376 6329 OTHER COMMUNICATION SERVICES 299 481 358 g CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 6320 COMMUNICATIONS 788 980 734 6350 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 6400 REPAIR&MAINT SERVICES 6401 MOTOR VEHICLE SERVICES 4,476 6402 EQUIPMENT SERVICES 45 6409 OTHER REPAIR&MAINT SVCS 524 850 6400 REPAIR&MAINT SERVICES 4,476 569 850 6410 RENTALS 6415 OTHER EQUIPMENT 3,019 6410 RENTALS 3,019 6420 IS SERVICES/LICENSES/FEES 6421 SOFTWARE LICENSE 696 6420 IS SERVICES/LICENSES/FEES 696 6430 MISCELLANEOUS 6434 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 20 60 6430 MISCELLANEOUS 20 60 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 9,000 1,549 1,644 6600 DEBT SERVICE 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 77,734 66,385 85,002 63,570 41,551 41,551 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 2,937 7,733 5,118 2,917 2,917 42187 AUTO THEFT GRANT 2,937 7,733 5,118 2,917 2,917 9 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 42188 COPS GRANT 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 4001 REVENUES 4300 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4310 FEDERAL REVENUE 4320 MISC FEDERAL GRANTS 16,021- 4310 FEDERAL REVENUE 16,021- 4340 STATE REVENUE 4359 OTHER STATE GRANTS/AID 132,473- 81,872- 69,620- 81,337- 81,337- 4340 STATE REVENUE 132,473- 81,872- 69,620- 81,337- 81,337- 4300 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 132,473- 81,872- 69,620- 16,021- 81,337- 81,337- 4001 REVENUES 132,473- 81,872- 69,620- 16,021- 81,337- 81,337- 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 6101 WAGES&SALARIES-FT EMPLOYEES 95,214 60,782 49,924 36,460 59,827 59,827 6102 OVERTIME-FT EMPLOYEES 3,960 2,652 2,136 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 99,174 63,433 49,924 38,596 59,827 59,827 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 6123 PERA POLICE&FIRE PLAN 12,777 8,934 7,039 5,442 8,436 8,436 6126 MEDICARE CONTRIBUTIONS 1,519 971 724 603 867 867 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 14,296 9,905 7,763 6,045 9,303 9,303 6130 INSURANCE BENEFITS 6131 CAFETERIA PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS 15,008 4,991 9,816 6,542 11,280 11,280 6130 INSURANCE BENEFITS 15,008 4,991 9,816 6,542 11,280 11,280 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 6151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE 3,996 3,543 2,117 1,624 2,692 2,692 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 3,996 3,543 2,117 1,624 2,692 2,692 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 132,473 81,872 69,620 52,807 83,102 83,102 6199 SUPPLIES 6200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6240 SMALL TOOLS&MINOR EQUIPMENT 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6320 COMMUNICATIONS 6350 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 6400 REPAIR&MAINT SERVICES 6410 RENTALS 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 10 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 132,473 81,872 69,620 52,807 83,102 83,102 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 36,766 1,765 1,765 42188 COPS GRANT 36,786 1,765 1,765 11 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 45020 RECREATION GRANTS 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 4001 REVENUES 4340 STATE REVENUE 4370 OTHER GRANTS/AID 4373 OTHER GRANTS/AID 12,000- 4370 OTHER GRANTS/AID 12,000- . 4399 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 4470 CHARGES FOR SERVICES-CARS 4473 CHILDREN RECREATION PROGRAMS 1,243- 1,055- 1,125- 1,000- 1,419- 1,419- 4470 CHARGES FOR SERVICES-CARS 1,243- 1,055- 1,125- 1,000- 1,419- 1,419- 4480 CHARGES FOR SERVICES-COMM CTR 4492 SPECIAL EVENTS 11,160- 10,115- 11,434- 11,110- 16,000- 16,000- 4480 CHARGES FOR SERVICES-COMM CTR 11,160- 10,115- 11,434- 11,110- 16,000- 16,000- 4399 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 12,403- 11,170- 12,559- 12,110- 17,419- 17,419- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4603 INTEREST EARNINGS 1,131- 577- 150- 4612 DONATIONS&CONTRIBUTIONS 42,758- 43,541- 14,850- 14,569- 14,850- 14,850- 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 43,889- 44,117- 14,850- 14,719- 14,850- 14,850- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 43,889- 44,117- 14,850- 14,719- 14,850- 14,850- 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 4921 REFUNDS&REIMBURSEMENTS 94- 543- 300- 4,048- 350- 350- 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 94- 543- 300- 4,048- 350- 350- 4001 REVENUES 56,386- 55,830- 27,709- 42,877- 32,619- 32,619- 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 6103 WAGES-PART TIME EMPLOYEES 5,482 3,324 7,437 3,624 8,162 8,162 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 5,482 3,324 7,437 3,624 8,162 8,162 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 6122 PERA COORDINATED PLAN 140 125 130 571 571 6125 FICA 340 206 227 505 505 6126 MEDICARE CONTRIBUTIONS 79 48 53 118 118 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 560 379 410 1,194 1,194 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 6151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE 74 48 47 105 105 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 74 48 47 105 105 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 6,116 3,751 7,437 4,081 9,461 9,461 6199 SUPPLIES 6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 6219 GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES 8,876 10,066 10,665 9,512 11,290 11,290 6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 8,876 10,066 10,665 9,512 11,290 11,290 12 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 6220 REPAIR&MAINT SUPPLIES 6242 MINOR EQUIPMENT 425 6220 REPAIR&MAINT SUPPLIES 425 6199 SUPPLIES 9,302 10,066 10,665 9,512 11,290 11,290 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6307 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,439 210 990 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,439 210 990 6320 COMMUNICATIONS 6330 TRANSPORTATION 6339 OTHER TRANSPORTATION EXPENSE 1,975 4,914 2,133 850 850 6330 TRANSPORTATION 1,975 4,914 2,133 850 850 6340 ADVERTISING 6349 OTHER ADVERTISING 160 6340 ADVERTISING 160 6350 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 6410 RENTALS 6430 MISCELLANEOUS 6431 SPECIAL EVENTS 12,478 12,307 9,700 13,526 9,700 9,700 6433 MEETING EXPENSES 717 9 49 6430 MISCELLANEOUS 13,196 12,316 9,700 13,575 9,700 9,700 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 6449 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICE 12,027 30,974 8,239 10,394 11,778 11,778 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 12,027 30,974 8,239 10,394 11,778 11,778 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 26,822 45,476 22,853 27,092 22,328 22,328 6600 DEBT SERVICE 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 42,239 59,293 40,955 40,685 43,079 43,079 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 14,147- 3,463 13,246 2,192- 10,460 10,460 45020 RECREATION GRANTS 14,147- 3,463 13,246 2,192- 10,460 10,460 13 This page has been left blank intentionally. 14 City of Brook& Center 2011 Budget FUND: Fund—27700 DEPT/DIVISION/ACTIVITY: TIF District 42-46412 PROFILE This fund accounts for all TIF revenues and expenditures for TIF District ##2, the Earle Brown TIF District. This TIF District was the primary financing tool for the redevelopment of the Earle Brown Terrace and Earle Brown Commons senior residential proj ects.. BACKGROUND OF THE DISTRICT This District was established in 1985. Its original purposed was to develop retail space, senior housing and to redevelop and preserve the Earle Brown Farm site. Activities pursued in the district included land acquisitions,road improvement, storm water control, traffic lights and streetscaping. Projects resulting from the efforts to improve the area include the Earle Brown Heritage Center, Earle Brown Commons and Earle Brown Terrace senior living facilities, and the Shingle Creek retail center. The district must be decertified by the end of 2011 DEPART'MEN'TAL GOALS • Prepare amendment of plan allowing accumulation of tax increments for use in any remaining possible improvement projects • Prepare for closure of the District by the required December 31, 2011 decertification date. EXPENDITURE DETAILS 6303 Legal Services $ 5,000 For activities and advice from legal counsel on the closure of the district in 2011 6307 Professional Services $ 5,000 For advice and counsel from a professional financial advisory services firm on the closure of the district in 2011 PERSONNEL LEVELS No personnel are assigned to this activity. CAPITAL OUTLAY None requested. 15 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 27700 TIF DISTRICT#2-EBHC 46412 TIF DISTRICT#2 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 4001 REVENUES 4050 'TAXES 4100 AD VALOREM TAXES 4150 TAX INCREMENTS 701,339- 905,702- 805,986- 490,162- 980,000- 980,000- 4100 AD VALOREM TAXES 701,339- 905,702- 805,986- 490,162- 980,000- 980,000- 4050 TAXES 701,339- 905,702- 805,986- 490,162- 980,000- 980,000- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4603 INTEREST EARNINGS 12,174- 12,676- 7,586- 5,000- 5,000- 4605 UNREALIZED INVESTMENT GAIN/LOS 1,494- 658- 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 13,668- 13,334- 7,586- 5,000- 5,000- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 13,668- 13,334- 7,586- 5,000- 5,000- 4900 01-11ER FINANCING SOURCES 4915 TRANSFERS IN 657- 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 657- 4001 REVENUES 715,007- 919,692- 805,986- 497,748- 985,000- 985,000- 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6301 ACCTG,AUDIT&FIN'L SERVICES 967 2,337 1,000 6303 LEGAL SERVICES 1,277 788 5,000 5,000 5,000 6307 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,515 12,000 5,000 5,000 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,244 9,639 18,000 10,000 10,000 6320 COMMUNICATIONS 6330 TRANSPORTATION 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 6449 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICE 657 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 657 6470 TRANSFERS AND OTHER USES 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 2,901 9,639 18,000 10,000 10,000 6500 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6600 DEBT SERVICE 16 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 2,901 91639 18,000 10,000 10,000 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 712,106- 910,053- 787,986- 497,748- 975,000- 975,000- 46412 TIE DISTRICT#2 712,106- 910,053- 787,986- 497,748- 975,000- 975;000- 27700 TIE DISTRICT#2-EBHC 712,106- 910,053- 787,986- 497,748- 975,000- 975,000- 17 This page has been left blank intentionally. 18 City of Brookjf n Center 2011 Budget FUND: Fund—27800 DEPT/DIVISION/ACTIVITY: TIF District#3 —46413 PROFILE This fund accounts for all TIF revenues and expenditures for TIF District #3. Major redevelopment projects within the District include 691h and Brooklyn Boulevard, the area around 66th and 252 including the theater and the town homes, as well as the area in and around Brookdale. Additional development work in this District includes site consolidation with the acquisition and demolition clearance of the Olive Garden, Cracker Barrel and Days Inn sites, the acquisition and demolition clearance of the Hmong America Center. The "Opportunity Site" north of 57th and east of Shingle Creek is partially included in the District. The TIF District #3 fund is annually transferring principal and interest payments to debt services funds for three outstanding TIF Revenue Bonds; the 2004B TI Refinancing Revenue Bonds, the 2004D TI Revenue Bonds and the 2008A TI Revenue Bonds. The final payment on the 2004B Refinancing Revenue Bonds will be made in February of 2011. DEPARTMENTAL GOALS Implement City Council redevelopment goals and provide for debt service payments. EXPENDITURE DETAILS 6474 Debt Service Fund Transfer $ 1,997,030 PERSONNEL LEVELS No personnel are assigned to this activity. C n pITAL 011TLAV Capital acquisition and construction/demolition requests will be made directly to the EDA and City Council as projects for utilization of the 15% reserve for low and moderate income housing arise and as costs for realization of the projects are determined.. 19 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10131/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 27600 TIE DISTRICT#3 46413 TIF DISTRICT#3 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 4001 .REVENUES 4050 TAXES 4100 AD VALOREM TAXES 4150 TAX INCREMENTS 1,900,386- 2,350,053- 2,115,541- 709,214- 1,560,270- 1,560,270- 4150.1 MKT VALUE CREDIT-TIF 5,667- 6,588- 4150 TAX INCREMENTS 1,906,053- 2,356,641- 2,115,541- 709,214- 1,560,270- 1,560,270- 4100 AD VALOREM TAXES 1,906,053- 2,356,641- 2,115,541- 7091214- 1,560,270- 1,560,270- 4050 TAXES 1,906,053- 2,356,641- 2,115,541- 709,214- 1,560,270- 1,560,270- 4300 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4362 COUNTY GRANTS/AID 115,046- 4300 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 115,046- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4603 INTERE=ST EARNINGS 256,404- 76,110- 60,000- 15,163- 12,000- 12,000- 4605 UNREALIZED INVESTMENT GAIN/LOS 16,306- 2,986- 4606 OTHER REVENUE 12,500- 250- 1- 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 285,209- 79,347- 60,000- 15,164- 12,000- 12,000- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 285,209- 79,347- 60,000- 15,164- 12,000- 12,000- , 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 492.1 REFUNDS&RE=IMBURSEMENTS 9,616- 4931 BOND SALES 4,335,000- 4933 DISCOUNT ON BOND SALES 28,178 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 4,306,823- 9,616- 4001 REVENUES 6,613,130- 2,435,988- 2,175,541- 733,994- 1,572,270- 1,572,270- 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 6101 WAGES&SALARIES-FT EMPLOYEES 28,696 1,939 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 28,696 1,939 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 6122 PERA COORDINATED PLAN 1,864 131 6125 FICA 1,801 121 6126 MEDICARE CONTRIBUTIONS 421 28 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 4,085 280 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 6151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE 221 17 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 221 17 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 33,002 2,236 6199 SUPPLIES 6200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 20 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 6219 GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES 346 6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 346 6199 SUPPLIES 346 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6301 ACCTG,AUDIT&FIN'L SERVICES 36,482 8,755 27,500 2,874 6302 ARCH.ENG&PLANNING 3,434 17,230 6303 LEGAL SERVICES 49,762 26,185 10,000 14,878 6307 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 66,021 38,624 18,000 8,113 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 155,699 90,794 55,500 25,865 632.0 COMMUNICATIONS 6330 TRANSPORTATION 6333 FREIGHT/DRAYAGE 173 9 6330 TRANSPORTATION 173 9 6340 ADVERTISING 6342 LEGAL NOTICES 222 6340 ADVERTISING 222 6350 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 6380 UTILITY SERVICES 6381 ELECTRIC 1,299 3,324 700 646 6382 GAS 330 625 1,200 352 6383 WATER 57 352 600 2,837- 6385 SEWER 13 66 200 594 6386 STORM SEWER 29,755 33,024 40,000 23,981 6389 STREET LIGHTS 2,076 2,193 3,000 1,678 6380 UTILITY SERVICES 33,531 39,584 45,700 24,414 6400 [REPAIR&MAINT SERVICES 6410 RENTALS 6430 MISCELLANEOUS 6433 MEETING EXPENSES 59 815 6430 MISCELLANE=OUS 59 815 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 6441 LICENSES,TAXES&FEES 109,067 19,709 22,694 6449 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICE 277,910 81,339 94,695 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 386,977 101,046 117,389 6470 TRANSFERS AND OTHER USES 6472 ENGINEERING SERVICE TRANSFER 628 9,130 6474 DEBT SERVICE FUND TRANSFER 462,061 2,493,054 3,573,462 3,571,224 1,997,030 1,997,030 6482 MISC TRANSFER OUT 781,122 6499 EXPENSES REIMBURSED 610,000 200,000 6470 TRANSFERS AND OTHER USES 1,243,811 3,112,184 3,573,462 3,771,224 1,997,030 1,997,030 21 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 1,820,472 3,344,427 3,674,662 3,938,900 1,997,030 1,997,030 6500 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6501 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6510 LAND 6,475,243 981,089 710,896 6530 IMPROVEMENTS 44,624 814,938 58,046 6501 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6,519,867 1,796,027 768,942 6500 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6,519,867 1,796,027 768,942 6600 DEBT SERVICE 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 8,373,686 5,142,689 3,674,662 4,707,842 1,997,030 1,997,030 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 1,760,556 2,706,702 1,499,121 3,973,847 424,760 424,760 46413 TI F DISTRICT#3 1,760,556 2,706,702 1,499,121 3,973,847 424,760 424,760 27800 TIF DISTRICT#3 1,760,556 2,706,702 1,499,121 3,973,847 424,760 424,760 22 City of(Brook&n Center 2011 (Budget FUND: Fund—27900 DEPT/DIVISION/ACTIVITY: TIF District 44—46414 PROFILE This fund accounts for all TIF revenues and expenditures for TIF District#4. The clean up of this contaminated site and its redevelopment has now been completed. Prior to the redevelopment of this superfund site, the project area had a market value (for tax purposes) of approximately $2,000,000. Today, the project area has a market value in excess of$20,000,000 and more than 400 fiill time jobs have been added. Companies including Caribou Coffee, Toro Distributing and Wickes Furniture are or have been tenants in the redeveloped properties. The financing provided by this district is "pay as you go" financing. Payments are made to the Developer/Owner who holds two Tax Increment Revenue notes issued by the City. The TIF paid to the Developer/Owner is equal to 97.5% of the tax increments paid by the Developer/Owner with the most recent property tax payment. If taxes are not paid by the property Developer/Owner, no increment is paid back to the Developer/Owner. These payments are applied to interest owed at that point on the Tax Increment Revenue Notes. Any remaining increment paid is applied to outstanding principal. These payments are limited to the earlier of the time that the note is paid in full or the time that the Tax Increment District is decertified. The District is scheduled to be decertified by December 31, 2020. DEPARTMENTAL GOALS • Provide for the payment of increment pursuant to the terms of applicable development agreements for the successful redevelopment of the properties in TIF District #4. • Analyze a possible buyout of the district through the acquisition and conveyance of a development parcel within the district in exchange for value on the TI Revenue Notes payable. PERSONNEL LEVELS No personnel are assigned to this activity. CAPITAL OUTLAY None requested. 23 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 27900 TIF DIST#4-FRANCE AVE BUS PK 46414 TIF DISTRICT#4 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 4001 REVENUES 4050 TAXES 4100 AD VALOREM TAXES 4150 TAX INCREMENTS 287,203- 339,404- 305,463- 169,853- 339,706- 339,706- 4100 AD VALOREM TAXES 287,203- 339,404- 305,463- 169,853- 339,706- 339,706- 4050 TAXES 287,203- 339,404- 305,463- 169,853- 339,706- 339,706- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4603 INTEREST EARNINGS 535- 261 28- 4605 UNREALIZED INVESTMENT GAIN/LOS 213- 59- 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 748- 320- 28- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 748- 320- 28- 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 4915 TRANSFERS IN 1,317- 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 1,317- 4001 REVENUES 289,267- 339,724- 305,463- 169,881- 339,706- 339,706- 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6301 ACCTG,AUDIT&FIN'L SERVICES 606 2,733 5,000 3,000 3,000 6303 LEGAL SERVICES 10,000 7,000 7,000 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 606 2,733 15,000 10,000 10,000 6330 TRANSPORTATION 6333 FREIGHT/DRAYAGE 18 6330 TRANSPORTATION 18 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 6449 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICE 1,500 5,000 5,000 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 1,500 5,000 5,000 6299 O FHER CHARGES&SERVICES 624 2,733 15,000 1,500 15,000 15,000 6600 DEBT SERVICE 6602 OTHER DEBT-PRINCIPAL 274,953 305,471 290,189 331,066 322,720 322,720 6600 DEBT SERVICE 274,953 305,471 290,189 331,066 322,720 322,720 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 275,577 308,203 305,189 332,566 337,720 337,720 24 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/3112010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 13,690- 31,521- 274- 162,685 1,986- 1,986- 46414 TIF DISTRICT#4 13,690- 31,521- 274- 162,685 1,986- 1,986- 27900 TIF DIST#4-FRANCE AVE BUS PK 13,690- 31,521- 274- 162,685 1,986- 1,986- 25 This page has been left blank intentionally. 26 City of Brooklyn Center 2011 Budget FUND: Capital Improvements Fund—40100 DEPT/ACTIVITY/PROJECT: Capital Improvements Fund—40100 PROFILE The Capital Improvements Fund provides for the accounting of sources (revenues) and uses (expenditures) of monies available from a number of sources such as the General Fund, enterprise funds and public utility funds. Available funds are used to finance government building and park improvements and to purchase land for public uses such as parks or other public facilities. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS The City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes a multi-year projection of capital improvement needs for the park system. Projects proposed for 2011 as part of the CIP include the following: • West Palmer Park Building Replacement • Centennial Park Youth Soccer Field • Capital Maintenance Building Program In order to provide proper cash flows for this fund it is suggested that two strategies be implemented. First, the contribution from the BC Liquor Fund to the Capital Improvements Fund should be increased from $ 135,000 per year to $ 160,000. Second, interfund borrowing of $ 300,000 per year should be considered in order to construct the West Palmer Park Building in 2011 and the Northport Park Building in 2012. This total of$ 600,000 borrowed from other City funds would be repaid at a rate of $ 100,000 per year plus 2.00% interest on the outstanding balance of the interfund loan. The loans would be fully repaid in 2016 with a total interest cost of $ 36,000. Possible sources of the internal borrowing are the Capital Reserve Emergency Fund, the Central Garage Fund or the BC Liquor Fund. DEPARTMENTAL GOALS Continue making park improvements in accordance with the multi-year plan and maintain and improve public facilities to provide for adequate function and accessibility to all. PERSONNEL LEVELS No personnel are assigned to this division. CAPITAL OUTLAY Projects as noted above and listed in the 2011 Capital Improvement Program. 27 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 40100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 40100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 4001 REVENUES 4300 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4340 STATE REVENUE 4370 OTHER GRANTS/AID 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4603 INTEREST EARNINGS 13,178- 2,840- 1,726- 317- 250- 250- 4605 UNREALIZED INVESTMENT GAIN/LOS 898- 115- 4612 DONATIONS&CONTRIBUTIONS 38,421- 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 52,498- 2,955- 1,726- 317- 250- 250- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 52,498- 2,955- 1,726- 317- 250- 250- 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 4915 TRANSFERS IN 9,138- 300,000- 300,000- 4915.1 TRANSFERS FROM LIQUOR FUND 135,000- 265,490- 135,000- 95,199- 160,000- 160,000- 4921 REFUNDS&REIMBURSEMENTS 188- 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 135,000- 274,815- 135,000- 95,199- 460,000- 460,000- 4001 [REVENUES 187,498- 277,771- 136,726 95,516- 460,250- 460,250- 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 6199 SUPPLIES 62.10 OPERATING SUPPLIES 6220 REPAIR&MAINT SUPPLIES 6240 SMALL TOOLS&MINOR EQUIPMENT 6242 MINOR EQUIPMENT 684 6240 SMALL TOOLS&MINOR EQUIPMENT 684 6199 SUPPLIES 684 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6302 ARCH,ENG&PLANNING 82,166 1,323 9,019 6307 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 16,415 132 3,242 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 98,581 1,454 12,262 6330 TRANSPORTATION 6340 ADVERTISING 6342 LEGAL NOTICES 785 908 6340 ADVERTISING 785 908 6350 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 28 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 6360 INSURANCE 6380 UTILITY SERVICES 6400 REPAIR&MAINT SERVICES 6409 OTHER REPAIR&MAINT SVCS 18,498 6400 REPAIR&MAINT SERVICES 18,498 6410 RENTALS 6420 IS SERVICES/LICENSES/FEES 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 6441 LICENSES,TAXES&FEES 1,500 - 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 1,500 6470 TRANSFERS AND OTHER USES 6472 ENGINEERING SERVICE TRANSFER 4,186 3,390 6470 TRANSFERS AND OTHER USES 4,186 3,390 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 123,550 5,752 12,262 6500 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6501 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6520 BUILDINGS&FACILITIES 22,311 6530 IMPROVEMENTS 234,229 462,732 339,000 292,149 350,000 350,000 6501 CAPITAL OUTLAY 234,229 485,043 339,000 292,149 350,000 350,000 6602 OTHER DEBT-PRINCIPAL 100,000 100,000 6612 OTHER DEBT-INTEREST 6,000 6,000 6500 CAPITAL OUTLAY 234,229 485,043 339,000 292,149 456,000 456,000 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 357,779 491,479 339,000 304,410 456,000 456,000 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 170,281 213,708 202,274 208,894 4,250- 4,250- 40100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 170,281 213,708 202,274 208,894 4,250- 4,250- 40100 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 170,281 213,708 202,274 208,894 4,250- 4,250- 29 City of Brooklyn Center AV Capital Improvements Fund Cash Flows Analysis Actual Budget Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Revenues Transfer in General Fund $ - $ 202,800 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Transfer in Liquor Fund $ 274,628 $ 135,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 Intergovernmental Revenue $ - $ - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Debt Payment Golf Course $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Misc Revenue $ 3,143 $ 1,596 $ 250 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Revenues $ 277,771 $ 339,396 $ 460,250 $ 460,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 Expenditures Personal Services $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - o Supplies $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Services $ 65,279 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Depreciation $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Debt Service $ - $ - $ 106,000 $ 110,000 $ 108,000 $ 106,000 $ 104,000 $ 102,000 Total Expenditures $ 65,279 $ - $ 106,000 $ 110,000 $ 108,000 $ 106,000 $ 104,000 $ 102,000 Capital Outlay $ 426,200 $ 339,000 $ 350,000 $ 477,000 $ 20,000 $ 115,000 $ 120,000 $ 127,000 Total Cash Requirement $ 491,479 $ 339,000 $ 456,000 $ 587,000 $ 128,000 $ 221,000 $ 224,000 $ 229,000 Beginning Cash Balance $ 553,315 $ 319,125 $ 319,521 $ 323,771 $ 196,771 $ 228,771 $ 167,771 $ 103,771 Changes in Assets/Liabilities $ (20,482) Revenues $ 277,771 $ 339,396 $ 460,250 $ 460,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 Expenditures $ (491,479) $ (339,000) $ (456,000) $ (587,000) $ (128,000) $ (221,000) $ (224,000) $ (229,000) Depreciation Add-Back $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Cash Balance $ 319,125 $ 319,521 $ 323,771 $ 196,771 $ 228,771 $ 167,771 $ 103,771 $ 34,771 I City of Brookfyn Center 2011 Budget FUND: Infrastructure Construction Fund—40700 DEPT/ACTIVITY/PROJECT: Infrastructure Construction Fund—40700 PROFILE The Infrastructure Construction Fund was formerly titled the Special Assessment Construction Fund and will continue to account for the financing of improvements funded all or in part by special assessments and transfers from the public utility funds. PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS Projects scheduled in 2011 are listed and described in the Capital Improvement Program section of the Budget. They include: • Logan Area Neighborhood Street& Utility Reconstruction • East Palmer Lake Neighborhood Street & Utility Reconstruction • Unity Avenue Street &Utility Improvements • Shingle Creek Parkway Street Improvements • Storm Water Ponds Dredging and Restoration (Ponds 12-002, 12-00') and 12-005) DEPARTMENTAL GOALS • Reconstruct/rehabilitate streets and utilities to improve infrastructure. • Enhance the appearance of neighborhoods. • Work cooperatively with other agencies to solve mutual problems that affect the City's infrastructure. PERSONNEL LEVELS No personnel are assigned to this division. CAPITAL OUTLAY Projects listed in the 2011 Capital Improvement Program. 31 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 4070D INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION 40700 INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 4001 REVENUES 430D INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4310 FEDERAL REVENUE 4320 MISC FEDERAL GRANTS 1,363,945- 4310 FEDERAL REVENUE 1,363,945- 4340 STATE REVENUE 4360 COUNTY GRANTS 4362 COUNTY GRANTS/AID 464,932- 4360 COUNTY GRANTS 464,932- 4370 OTHER GRANTS/AID 4300 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,828,877- 4399 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 4430 CHGS FOR SERVICES-PUBLIC WORKS 4431 WEED CUTTING CHARGES 11,795- 23,530- 50,000- 57,575- 50,000- 50,000- 4434 DISEASED TREE REMOVAL 26,738- 23,799- 45,000- 29,349- 20,000- 20,000- 4430 CHGS FOR SERVICES-PUBLIC WORKS 38,533- 47,329- 95,000- 86,923- 70,000- 70,000- 4399 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 38,533- 47,329- 95,000- 86,923- 70,000- 70,000- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4601 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 467,561- 168,089- 405,200- 645,156- 1,122,968- 1,122,968- 4602 SPECIAL ASSESS-PENALTIES&INT 5,226- 5,262- 136- 4606 OTHER REVENUE 3,668- 1,174- 1,788- 4607 SPEC ASSESS INTEREST 169- 1,659- 1,283- 4600 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 476,625- 176,185- 405,200- 648,362- 1,122,968- 1,122,968- 4599 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 476,625- 176,185- 405,200. 648,362- 1,122,968- 1,122,968- 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 4915 TRANSFERS IN 831,297- 8,367,800- 7,621,500- 7,621,500- 4931 BOND SALES 2,339,932- 4900 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 3,171,230- 8,367,800- 7,621,500- 7,621,500- 4001 REVENUES 3,686,388- 223,514- 8,868,000- 2,564,162- 8,814,468- 8,814,468- 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 6103 WAGES-PART TIME EMPLOYEES 706 6104 OVERTIME-PART TIME EMPLOYEES 7 6100 WAGES AND SALARIES 713 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 6125 FICA 44 6126 MEDICARE CONTRIBUTIONS 10 6120 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 55 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 32 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 6151 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE 3 6150 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 3 6099 PERSONAL SERVICES 770 6199 SUPPLIES 6200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6201 OFFICE SUPPLIES 322 6200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 322 6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 62.14 CLOTHING&PERSONAL EQUIPMENT 160 6219 GENERAL OPERATING SUPPLIES 5,133 294 6210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 5,133 294 160 6220 REPAIR&MAINT SUPPLIES 6230 REPAIR&MAINT SUPPLIES-OTHER 6240 SMALL TOOLS&MINOR EQUIPMENT 6199 SUPPLIES 5,133 616 160 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6302 ARCH,ENG&PLANNING 180,863 445,634 300,000 452,797 954,250 954,250 6303 LEGAL SERVICES 769 19,561 2,000 2,544 2,500 2,500 6307 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 42,400 45,907 45,000 27,376 30,000 30,000 6300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 224,032 511,102 347,000 482,717 986,750 986,750 6320 COMMUNICATIONS 6321 TELEPHONE/PAGERS 928 772 886 6320 COMMUNICATIONS 928 772 886 6330 TRANSPORTATION 6333 FREIGHT/DRAYAGE 29 45 6330 TRANSPORTATION 29 45 6340 ADVERTISING 6342 LEGAL NOTICES 1,527 2,350 2,297 6340 ADVERTISING 1,527 2,350 2,297 6350 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 6351 PRINTING 3,585 6350 PRINTING AND DUPLICATING 3,585 6400 REPAIR&MAINT SERVICES 6405 PARK&LANDSCAPE SERVICES 71,366 57,462 50,000 51,882 315,000 315,000 6409 OTHER REPAIR&MAINT SVCS 6,218 6400 REPAIR&MAINT SERVICES 77,585 57,462 50,000 51,882 315,000 315,000 6430 MISCELLANEOUS 6434 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 82 6438 CASH SHORT(OVER) 48- 15- 29 6430 MISCELLANEOUS 48- 15- 111 33 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Budget Report 2008 2009 2010 10/31/2010 2011 2011 Actual Actual Final YTD Recommended Approved Object Code/Description Amount Amount Budget Actual Budget Budget 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 6441 LICENSES,TAXES&FEES 1,985 4,575 1,750 6442 COURT AWARDS/SETTLEMENTS 160,800 6440 OTHER EXPENSES 1,985 165,375 1,750 6460 CENTRAL GARAGE CHARGES 6462 FIXED CHARGES 307 6460 CENTRAL GARAGE CHARGES 307 6470 TRANSFERS AND OTHER USES 6471 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE TRANSFE 413,910 413,910 6472 ENGINEERING SERVICE TRANSFER 250,505 314,574 363,485 6470 TRANSFERS AND OTHER USES 250,505 314,574 363,485 413,910 413,910 6490 OTHER MISC COSTS/EXPENSES 6499 EXPENSES REIMBURSED 3,773,175- 3,604,491- 2,750 6490 OTHER MISC COSTS/EXPENSES 3,773,175- 3,604,491- 2,750 6299 OTHER CHARGES&SERVICES 3,212,740- 2,552,871- 760,485 542,438 1,715,660 1,715,660 6500 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6501 CAPITAL OUTLAY 6530 IMPROVEMENTS 5,879,963 3,104,400 10,104,800 6,462,823 7,826,840 7,826,840 6501 CAPITAL OUTLAY 5,879,963 3,104,400 10,104,800 6,462,823 7,826,840 7,826,840 6500 CAPITAL OUTLAY 5,879,963 3,104,400 10,104,800 6,462,823 7,826,840 7,826,840 I 6600 DEBT SERVICE 6621 PAYING AGENT/OTHER FEES 588 237 477 6600 DEBT SERVICE 588 237 477 6001 EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES 21672,943 553,153 10,865,285 7,005,897 9,542,500 9,542,500 4000 REVENUES AND EXPENSES 1,013,445- 329,639 1,997,285 4,441,736 728,032 728,032 40700 INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION 1,013,445- 329,639 1,997,265 4,441,736 728,032 728,032 032 728 032 _ 997 285 4 441,736 728, , - CONSTRUCTION 1 013 445 329,639 1, 40700 INFRASTRUCTURE CO STRUCTIO , 34 • Work Session Agenda Item No. 2 r COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM . DATE: November 17, 2010 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development SUBJECT: Discussion on Issues and Options relating to use of Tax Increment Financing and the redevelopment of the Brookdale Mall properties. Recommendation: This report is being presented as information only and is intended to assist the City Council in understanding the issues and options associated with the creation of a new tax increment financing district to assist in the redevelopment of the Brookdale Mall. Issues: The Brookdale Mall properties are presently part of Tax Increment District No. 3, a Redevelopment Tax Increment District that was established in 1994 and runs through 2021. Tax Increment/General Obligation Bonds were sold to provide assistance to various commercial redevelopment and housing development projects, with a payment schedule that runs through 2020. • The three challenges to the City's economic development efforts that were identified at the January 11, 2010 City Council Work Session included: 1. The diminishing valuation of the Brookdale Mall properties from its 1994 TIF frozen/base valuation is affecting the future ability of TIF District 3 to generate sufficient funds to make future debt payments. 2. The availability of any additional funding for economic development incentive or assistance for the Brookdale parcels is curtailed until TIF #3 is decertified in 2021. 3. The removal of the Brookdale parcels from TIF #3 would improve the increment generation of the district and could provide opportunities for the reformation of the Brookdale parcels into a new economic development or tax increment district; however, the action would reduce the general tax base by $504,976 or about 2.16% based on the 2009/2010 taxes, unless corresponding tax base were added to the general tax base at the same time. A copy of the January 11, 2010 staff report has been attached for your reference. The City's financial consultant is currently updating their prior TIF 3 analysis and re- evaluating the effects on the City's tax base and tax levy with the following mitigating factors: 1. Additional tax base from the FBI Site and plans by Luther Automotive to proceed with their Phase III improvements in 2011. 2. The decertification of Tax Increment District 2 in 2011. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe conuntnity that enhances the qualio of life and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Based on preliminary discussions, it does appear that there are options that would allow all or • portions of the Brookdale Mall properties to be dropped out of TIF 3 without a negative effect on either the City's tax base or tax levy. A tax increment update and recommendation on this matter is planned for a January, 2011 City Council meeting. Options: The tax increment financing options that are being considered include the following: 1. The creation of a new 9 year Economic Development District under the 2010 Minnesota Jobs Bill. This Bill temporarily expands the eligible developments to include office, retail and residential uses, providing that the necessary "But - For" findings are made and construction starts before July 1, 2011. 2. The creation of a new 16 year Renewal and Renovation District. This district requires a finding that 20% of the buildings are structurally substandard and at least 30% of the other buildings require a substantial renovation or clearance. This district includes also requires the "But — For" findings and has a requirement that at least 90% of the tax increment must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allowed the designation/qualification of the district. A description of a Renewal and Renovation District and definition of structural) substandard • P Y has been attached to this memo for your reference. At this time, a building inspector, recommended by our Financial Consultant, is completing a review of the Mall structures and evaluating conditions to determine the potential eligibility of the Brookdale Mall as a Renewal and Renovation District. It is anticipated that his findings will be available next week. Additionally, the developer has received the list of the information required for our Financial Consultant to complete their analysis and provide a recommendation on the "But — For test. il Attached for your reference is a copy of the submittal requirements that will enable our consultant to complete their analysis and report on the But — For test. So far, the only information provided by the developer is a list of items that they have identified as extraordinary development costs of approximately $13,000,000. At this time, there has not been an analysis on whether these items and estimates costs are either necessary or justified for economic assistance. Our Financial consultants will be at the November 22 °a work session to provide an overview of the tax increment options, identify a schedule to establish a new TIF District, and respond to Council questions. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality oJlife and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Budget Issues: Actions of the EDA regarding this item may have a budgetary impact in future years. The developer, Gatlin Development Company, is paying for the Tax Increment Consultant's review and the building inspections. • Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe conmiunity that enhances the duality of life and preserves the public trust TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (TIF) IN MINNESOTA Renewal and Renovation TIF District • How To Qualify — • Parcels comprising 70% of the area of the district are occupied (at least 15% of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, parking lots); • at least 20% of the buildings (excluding out buildings) are structurally substandard'; and • at least 30% of the other buildings (excluding out buildings) require substantial renovation or clearance to remove existing conditions such as inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to the health, safety, and general well -being of the community. • All which is reasonably distributed throughout the geographic area of the district. Term of District — ■ 15 years after receipt by the Authority of the first increment (16 total years); and ■ TIF authority may specify in the TIF plan the first year in which it elects to receive increment, up to four years following the year of approval of the district. Eligible Expenditures /Limitations — • • At least 90% of the tax increment must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation of the district. These costs include, but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements or hazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures, clearing of land, removal of hazardous substances or remediation necessary to develop the land, and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site • Allowable 10% administration may be included within the above qualified costs. • No more than 10% of the tax increment could be used in general for TIF - eligible expenditures (i.e., not correcting conditions) within the TIF district or spent outside the district, but within the Redevelopment Project area. 1 "Structurally substandard" means containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing anew structure of the same square footage and type on the site. 2 Preliminary list of eligible costs from the Gatlin Development Company include: piles, demolition, removal of parking areas, soil remediation, contaminant removal including asbestos, installation of vapor barrier, Shingle Creek day- lighting, installation of bike and walking paths, street/parkway landscaping, installation of sewer lift station, relocation of utilities. Prepared by Springsted for Brooklyn Center — Proposed Shingle Creek Crossing TIF Information required to complete financial assistance analysis ( "But For" Analysis) Brookdale Redevelopment • Project Details The Shingle Creek Crossing Site Plan includes the following buildings and SF: ■ Wal -Mart — 152,036 s.f. ■ Jr. Anchor #1— 57,671 s.f. ■ Jr. Anchor #2 — 36,532 s.f. ■ Mall space — 122,242 s.f. ■ 5 Restaurant Pads — 32,203 s.f. total (3,530 — 7,700 — 5,813 — 7,555 — 7,605) ■ 5 Retail bldgs — 91,695 s.f. total (15,353 — 45,021 - 13,770 — 8,533 — 9,018 ) o What is cost of construction per type of retail building? o What is cost for site improvements and public infrastructure costs? o Include detailed breakdown of all project costs, land acquisition through building construction. Project Phasing ■ Include commencement and completion for each building construction, or each site improvement, or public infrastructure • ■ Include date for sale of unit or lease of unit, occupancy start and full occupancy, etc Project Financing • Include a complete sources and uses of funds for the entire project (through building occupancy) • Include preliminary assumptions for bank financing, i.e., principal, term, rate • Include equity amount and timing of equity in project • Include take -out source of bank financing for construction period, if applicable • Include letters of commitment or interest from financial institutions • Include amount of public financing request, and form of request, i.e., bonds, pay -go- note, etc • Include gap amount to match public financing request (all equity and private sources are insufficient to pay all costs) — Prepare a sources and uses with and without requested subsidy • Include description of and rationale behind proposed governmental financial assistance Public Financing Revenue Assumptions ■ Include estimated appraised value per type of retail building ■ Include any growth assumptions Project Operation • Include operating assumptions related to each type of retail bldg - o include revenue and expense assumptions and increases o include reserve assumptions (capital, operating, etc.) • o include type of lease, estimated lease rate, est. operating expenditures, assumed vacancy, etc o include lease commission assumptions • Include complete pro -forma (construction through operations for a total of 15 years) calculating internal rate of return one with and one without requested financial assistance and a hypothetical sale in the final year of the pro -forma and identify assumed capitalization rate (We would expect the internal rate of return calculation for the pro -forma without assistance to be below that necessary to attract private capital) • If the pro -forma and internal rate of return calculations include debt service, include all related debt assumptions • Include proposed or likely tenants, with job and wage information General Information /Assumptions ■ Qualify any published source used in any of the above I 01709 tl oosccsos, o< xoxr.n,s» sxr .vxsssr ,wMr..s m°xAxe r a xro wa .� s ° '"- ` '0» 133rOtld _ A, root x3»iW 3dL / "�' C \ \ \ \'• \ z 0,02 .O l v+uraO xo, xvu rw,ro»» Aw xm ' tiv2e \ \ 31 ¢xo ° 93a1d3 \ \ i YY Ora "345 '� r- y. � _ \ Z .i O x°x,n,; � � �",°� �� `•," � tx ,rn wn ,.xm3,., i � � �� ,�\ 1 ` �' � � R i N1 — , rn r: sw::m n w a 7O,n wm„r ra m MOM rwx3,¢ ,wrww 3n ¢a3>b m ,3M ,vM ,avow Lw, m, »Ax ¢ r, -3xxxa m o3m nw¢u ; , •:' , <' ` i `�' ic ,2. ;_ '7'' 1 s { i x 0 � a. vMxYx aw YLrB T rn ne r bro�i rm�is p� „ Y ) y y�i t ` 1 o O to o< vnx nrwro Ax xx»new xx, Z ¢ avx¢ o woAO n xro w¢ xo aro:x� W k i al z m sxxsm.M O1 318V1 V1V0 311S v.t t i A m �v Al "> ¢uox. 3xsnr aM v>,vxm °ar a w x3xMn r wr¢ » ro , '�r '�` fix. -\ �' .�•' _ . n� •A `\ . ._ . : f i, �t �f y ,�' - t`L� , t'i . \ 1 n 3.xw TM < xwanAw w, „m. „N. m =' e m xmw wawxx� d s�w.oa rnv. n.w""wm�w s �.+ws s 5IOlOVH1NOJ OL 1k3lV „� ,, :•I� p + ,C <,, �. -•.�-, a \ y �,{t�� � � r xw sxru 3vO1 _ i 1 r aM swawa »xa N0' L000- 15° -lt9 Y3tlY AlA Htwl /�'' \T ' �✓ `x\ \ Vrti` `K .t' Y 1 , s r $NMv36 UMLL3-38 6NOO 330 (n » 3e'Mxs sarn sxr sxwrxww o°»"m°"riaixov w»r, sari -zsz ooe -, 33tl1 fi { ,A 3NO llVO 31ViS V3HdOS aax.mox. » >,aowa n ,xsA,..a oMSw aaw3r rms w,a.wxw 13r1 »00 asrY, sYaavmNw rn 1'r d? \ \ �(, fi ! ✓„ r 'j( t'd b m M Sa.wna Yauro oM ° acomxe " ia,:x mma miar s ', (/, , Y LL 6tlY36 �L - f1 2 t i S'1 a r � s¢.aro uw:vee nr u xouavow xw v wuarvx°a , 3nssi sw ax¢s3ww : f '1� ✓'' ' '� 1 ONI1sma 1� 31ON NV1d 3LS smur �'x."�x.aro> "':'mx°« �.,1',ff!� , `;i i , ;,'� t l: , CZ 1](OtlYYI YY Ka'L6L ,,� , j 1 ' S o ,x '�' , �, anoa'oaL-a J. I s: t:::' j %: •' > Y Y .th oo'KKaarola \� \'• tji'' �''�'.; -;.,- `, k`` i r n.ws..,s¢ anew.: saomw � ' �•' r � L < � - 1 \ 4. p� 9 ' � irx, sro»nu» roaex. .w »w.w '' � /. \ = f �,,: I `• i ' B y w xn¢3m v3daoa rosa.ow / ✓! / Q i i :ON30 H3 VH 1N3N3AVd »a �g�a� �+ "� :sxwiY :• / j' " v; ;`� : / f % r' I � + g$ ON3031108WAS I . ��'� Q H1uoN '°:�� / Y� �` ♦. 3.C' �r • P �'' ® . , O° __ � Q ', �j t � � �. p ,, r oriusn<3 3 : y� _ - ss- fir, - ..._�_ -. -�_. --- ��._ x ., 10 i,�a.�.•Q_ — aaoLlaanssYa nL.oN au - uarw ._.... w ��. w �.. r _ Ip ss Y MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE: January 7, 2010 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Dan Jordet, Director of Fiscal and Support Services Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development SUBJECT: Update on Tax Increment Finance Districts COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: The status report of these three tax increment districts is being presented as information 1 Th only. e data is intended to inform the Council of the current status of each of the three active Tax Increment Districts and the potential opportunities to assist in achieving Council goals. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 2: Tax Increment District No. 2 was established in 1985, as a redevelopment district, to remedy conditions of economic obsolescence, physical blight, under utilization of land, extensive soil corrections which the private sector has not been willing or able to accomplish and correction of numerous traffic hazards and pedestrian conflicts. • In 1994, the district's project area was enlarged to include the geographic boundaries of the city and the following additional objectives were added: • To enhance the tax base of the City. • To provide maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City, for redevelopment by private enterprise. • To better utilize vacant or undeveloped land. • To attract new businesses. • To acquire blighted or deteriorated residential propriety for rehabilitation or clearance and redevelopment. • To develop housing opportunities for market segments underserved in the City, including housing for the disabled and elderly. The District consisted of 61.59 acres located east of Shingle Creek Parkway, north of John Martin Drive and west of Earle Brown Drive and had a base tax capacity of $ 350,282. The 2009 tax capacity of the 11 commercial retail office and residential land uses is $999 947 p tY , which results in an incremental tax capacity of $ 649,665 or approximately 185% growth since the district was created. In 2008, the 6.15 acres Embassy Suites site was removed from the District. • This district has a fund balance of $1,919,954.66 as of 12- 31 -09. 1 The district is scheduled to expire in 2011 and is projected to generate $1,743,000 in additional tax increment revenue which is $1,663,117 in present day value. The City's TIF consultant, Briggs & Morgan, is recommending that a formal budget amendment, including public hearing and notifications to the other governmental units, be completed prior to use of this $3.6M+ of additional funds. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.3 Tax Increment District No. 3 was established in 1994 to provide assistance to various commercial redevelopment and housing development projects within the District. The District is a scattered site district with three sites, the Brooklyn Boulevard /69th Area, the Brookdale Area, and the Willow /252 Area and included the following objectives: - To enhance the tax base of the City - To provide maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City, for development by private enterprise, - To better utilize vacant or underdeveloped land To attract new businesses - To acquire blighted or deteriorated residential property for rehabilitation or clearance and redevelopment, - To develop housing opportunities for market segments underserved by the City including housing for the disabled and elderly. The district consisted of 221 p arcels of land, 174 of which contained existing houses and structures with a 1994 base tax capacity of $2,290,408. The current tax capacity in 2009 is $3,447,706, creating an incremental tax capacity of $1,197,208. Special state legislation associated with the creation of this Tax Increment District included provisions which required that 15% of the revenues generated from tax increment in any year is deposited in the housing development account of the authority and expended according to the tax increment financing plan. Additionally, the legislation included certain time constraints for the expenditure of the tax increments on planned activities /acquisitions /capital improvements. Special legislation extended the initial 10 year deadline to 13 years. and on May 15, 2008, this district moved to a debt service mode (ie. with the exception of the 15% housing fund, all new increment is limited to paying off the existing debt of the district. In 2008, the last bond sales allowed within this district occurred which provided the funding for the Xerxes Ave. Streetscape Improvements and the James Ave. water trunk realignment. The balance of the loan proceeds is $ 2,134,069, of which $1.8M has been allotted to the 2010 Bass Lake Road Streetscape Improvement Project. Additionally, $250,000 of these funds have been identified as a funding source for the City's portion of a potential grant associated with a restoration project of Shingle Creek. Also, in 2008, the EDA adopted Resolution No. 2008 -05 which amended the budget to 2 include the following activities to address foreclosure issues and the 57th and Logan Ave. dry cleaner vapor study: • - Acquisition of single and multi - family housing - Rehabilitation of single and multi - family housing - Environmental remediation of single family and multi - family housing properties The Housing Fund has a balance of $3,154,154 as of December 31, 2009. In January, 2009, the City Council approved the Renew Loan and Remove & Rebuild Foreclosure Programs and allotted $1.6M form this TIF Housing Account. Currently, the Renew Loan Program has used $635,000 of its $1M budget and the Remove and Rebuild Program has used #300,000 of its $600,000 budget. This 15% housing fund will continue to funded by the annual tax increments through the expiration of this district in 2021. Presently, approximately $300,000 a year is placed into this fund which over the remaining 12 years could amount to an additional $3.6 M for housing related activities. The outstanding debt in TIF #3 includes two bond issues: Go Tax Increment Bonds 2004D sold in the amount of $17,245,000. The outstanding principal on these bonds is $14,310,000 as of December 31, 2009. The final payment on these bonds will be made on February 1, 2020. GO Tax Increment Bonds 2008A sold in the amount of $4,335,000. The outstanding principal on these bonds is $2,665,000 as of December 31, 2009. The final payment on these bonds will be made on February 1, 2018. Both Bonds were based on projected tax increments exclusive of the Brookdale Mall properties. $3,432,586.63 of the total $8,720,809.82 cash balance in TIF # 3 is reserved as payment for these debts. An issue that continues to be monitored is the diminishing valuation of the Brookdale Mall properties and their effects on the District's ability to generate sufficient tax increment to meet annual debt service. The 1994 base tax capacity for the Brookdale Mall Properties was 929,426, calculated from a base value of $46,621,300 which included the Applebee's and Kohl's parcels. The current tax capacity, as recently stipulated by Hennepin County, is 424,450 or 504,976 less than the base value, a loss of 54.33 %. This loss is currently absorbed by the entire TIF #3 district before any increment is calculated and lowers the overall increment available from TIF #3 by more than $700,000 ($715,565.85 at a 142.099% tax extension rate). This presents three challenges to the City's economic development efforts: • 3 1. The ability to generate sufficient funds to make dept payments is reduced by leaving • the Brookdale parcels in the TIF #3 district. 2. The availability of any additional funding for economic development incentive or assistance for the Brookdale parcels is curtailed until TIF #3 is decertified in 2021. 3. The removal of the Brookdale parcels from TIF #3 would improve the increment generation of the district and could provide opportunities for the reformation of the Brookdale parcels into a new economic development or tax increment district that could facilitate redevelopment opportunities for the mall properties and surrounding area. However, the action would reduce the general tax base by 504,976 or about 2.16% unless corresponding tax base were added to the general tax base at the same time. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.4 Tax Increment District No. 4 is a soils district that was established in 1999 to assist in certain public redevelopment costs associated with the Twin Lakes Business Park. The district consists of 29.26 acres and had a base tax capacity of $37,762. The 2009 tax capacity of the 3 industrial lots (Wickes Furniture - now Wagner Spray Technology, Baker Furniture /Toro, and Caribou) is $ 312,450, a 725% growth of the tax capacity of the district. In 2009, the district generated $399,404 in increments, (after fiscal disparity deductions). Of that amount, 97.5% was used to pay off a $1,666,143 note issued in 1999 and a $758,056 note issued in 2002. The outstanding debt in this district is held by Joslyn Manufacturing and Twin Lakes Business Partnership. It is retired on pay -as- you -go basis using only 97.5% of the increments actually paid in the district each year to a maximum of the outstanding note plus interest. The pay -as- you -go notes, totally $2,424,199, were issued with an interest rate of 8 %. The obligation matures when the district is decertified in 2020 and any unpaid principal remaining at that time is canceled. 12 -31 -2009 cash balance is $173,043.61 Of that amount, $165,459.46 will be paid to Joslyn Manufacturing and Twin Lakes Business Partnership on February 1, 2010, leaving a net balance of $7,584.15. COUNCIL POLICY ISSUES: The future identification and prioritizing of eligible acquisitions and /or capital improvements that the Council wishes to include in a potential $3.6M + budget amendment to Tax Increment District No. 2. The consideration of the future removal of all or portions of the Brookdale Mall properties from Tax Increment District # 3. 4 Public Sector Advisors PIP ilkz © springstea ty o/ 3BR70 OKLYN TER Tax Increment Financing in Minnesota Proposed Shingle Creek Crossing November 22,2010 PRESENTER: Jenny Wolfe,Senior Project Manager Public Sector Advisors ;. Springsted 1 What is TIF? • A method of capturing tax base growth resulting from new development • Captures new local taxes (increment) to pay for public improvements related to development • Fixed term for capture, then new development added to tax base Public Sector Advisors © Springsted ....................... ............... ............ Tax Increment Financing • Defined by State Statute 469.174 — 469.1799 • Gap financing tool • Different types of Districts, different qualifications • Depending on year created, different compliance requirements apply • Provides incentive and funding p for development ..___ __ Public sector Advisor © Springsted i 2 Tax Increment Variables/Definition • Base Values • Estimated Market Value (EMV) • Net Tax Capacity • Tax Classification Rates • Tax Capacity Rates • Tax increment is the difference between property taxes without new development to property taxes with new development Public Sector Advisors How are property taxes calculated? Parcel Class Taxable Taxable times Rate equals Net Tax Market (e.g. CA, Capacity Value Resid.) (NTC) Taxable Local NTC- Net Tax times Tax equals Based Capacity Capacity Property (NTC) Rates Taxes Public Sector Advisors Springsted 3 How is TIF calculated? • Net Tax Capacity from existing land and building value is called the Original NTC after conversion from Base Value. — Property taxes generated by the ONTC of the TIF district continue to flow to individual taxing jurisdictions (e.g. City, County, ISD). • NTC growth above the ONTC is captured by the TIF district and generates tax increment. Public sector Advisors Springstea How is TIF calculated? i NT V�Taxe Increase in Increase In Tax Taxable (Captured) Increment Market Net Tax times Revenue Value Capacity Tax (TIF) Original Original Rates Taxes to TMV NTC Entities Springsted 4 How is a TIF District Created? • Development District TIF District — TIF Plan • Budget • Geographic boundaries • Purpose — Public Hearing — Certification Springsted Estimated Calendar — Shingle Creek Crossing Nov. 22—City Council Work Session • Dec. 13— City Council Calls for Public Hearing — City and EDA review TIF Plan • Dec. 23—County and School District Receive TIF Plan and Impacts • Jan. 13— Planning Commission reviews TIF Plan • Jan. 24—City Council holds public hearing and considers adoption of TIF Plan Springsted 5 Process for Approving TIF District - Subsidy Review - Approximate 60 day approval process, which includes notifications to County and School Board, publication of hearing notice, Planning Commission review, and holding of public hearing - But-For test: — City to make a finding that"...the proposed redevelopment would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future..." v Springstee Analysis of Subsidy Request - Process of testing subsidy request and measuring against industry standards - Two questions are asked and answered: — Is the assistance necessary? — How much assistance is needed? - Objective: — Provide minimum subsidy required to get a project completed — Mitigate city risk 6 Types of TIF Districts (Determines Timeframe and Uses of TIF) • Redevelopment • Renewal and Renovation • Housing • Soils Condition • Economic Development • Other — Hazardous Substance Subdistrict i Renewal and Renovation District • Qualifications — Improved parcels make up at least 70%of the district. — More than 20%of the buildings (excluding outbuildings)are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. — A building is not considered substandard if it could be brought up to code at a cost of less than 15% of a comparable new building on that parcel. — More than 30%of the other buildings (excluding outbuildings) require substantial renovation or clearance to remove existing conditions Public. A,,,\ .%o,s ..r". 5pringsted 7 Economic Development District • District for which the Authority finds to be in the public interest because- - it will discourage commerce, industry, or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state or municipality; — it will result in increased employment in the state; or — will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the state © Springsted District Restrictions • District Term — Renewal and Renovation • 15 years after the date of receipt of first increment (16 years maximum); • Authority may elect first year of receipt, within four years from year of approval of TIF — Economic Development • 8 years after the date of receipt of first increment (9 years maximum). Springsted 8 I, District Restrictions • Renewal and Renovation — At least 90%of the increment must be used to finance the costs of correcting conditions that allow designation of a renewal and renovation district.These costs include but are not limited to: • Acquiring properties containing substandard improvements or hazardous substances; • Demolition and rehabilitation of structures,clearing of land; • Removal or remediation of hazardous substances;and • Installation of utilities,roads,sidewalks and parking facilities. • Economic Development — Increment cannot be spent if more than 15%of the buildings s.f. within the district are NOT used for manufacturing,warehousing, storage,distribution, research and development,telemarketing, tourism,or qualified border retail tx Springsted Exception under 2010 Statutes • Tax increments from an Economic Development district may be used to provide assistance in any form if — the municipality finds that the project will create or retain jobs in this state, including construction jobs, and that construction of the project would not have commenced before July 1,2011, without the authority providing the assistance; — construction of the project begins no later than July 1, 2011; and — the request for certification is made no later than June 30, 2011 , Springst?o 9 ................._............ Typical Eligible Costs • Public Improvements • Acquisition • Soil Correction • Site Preparation/Demolition • Relocation • Financing Fees/Capitalized Interest • Administrative Costs (10%) © Sprfngsted Public Improvement Costs Allowed • Streets and Roads • Utilities • Bridges and Interchanges • Parking • Sidewalks and walkways • Soft costs related to any of the above Public 5BCCOI Advisors i� � Springsted 10 Public Improvement Costs Not Allowed • Public Buildings such as a City Center, Public Safety, Public Works buildings • Culture and Recreation such as parks, community centers, golf courses, etc. • Administration beyond 10% of TIF collections Questions Jenny Wolfe, Senior Project Manager 651-223-3085 Springsted Incorporated 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300 Saint Paul, MN 55101-2887 Springsted 11 f Work Session Agenda Item No. 3 MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE: November 19, 2010 TO: City Council FROM: Curt Boganey, City Mana e SUBJECT: AMF Bowling Center Inc, Liquor License Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider providing direction to staff regarding g Background: Given the standards of the City ordinance governing liquor licenses, staff has determined that AMF Bowling Center Restaurant does not meet the standard for Class C On Sale License. There it has been recommended that the City schedule an application hearing for December 12tH, 2010 I have enclosed a letter from Kaela Brennan representing the applicant. The applicant has submitted an explanation of why food sales have fallen below the required threshold and has proposed a plan to remedy the situation. From discussions with the City Attorney, it appears the City Council has the authority to 1. Deny the license 2. Grant the license with the conditions the Council deems appropriate. The City Attorney will be at the worksession to provide further legal guidance if required. Policy Issues: What action would best serve the long term interest of the City? fission:Ensurdnq an attractive,elean,safe comnunify that enhances the quality of daft and preserves the publie trust MCGRANN SHEA CARNIVAL STRAUGHN & LAMB, CHARTERED ATTORNEYS AT LAW WILLIAM R. MCGRANN U.S. BANCORP CENTER AMY L. COURT DOUGLAS M. CARNIVAL 800 NICOLLET MALL ALBERT E. LI ROBERT O.STRAUGHN CHRISTINE L. MENNEN PETER L. COOPER SUITE 2600 EMILY J. PIPER KATHLEEN M. LAMB MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA MICHAEL P. ELDRIDGE JOHN R. SCHULZ JASON H. THOMAS COREY J.AYLING 55402-7035 JOELLE M. LESTER SCOTT B. CROSSMAN CARLA J. PEDERSEN TELEPHONE (612) 338-2525 KATHLEEN MICHAELA BRENNAN FACSIMILE (612) 339-2386 JOSEPH T. BAGNOLI JENNIFER A.JAMESON ROGER J. STELLJES www.mcgrannshea.com JEFFREY C. URBAN TIMOTHY J. NOLA N' - Or COVNSEL CARL S. WOSMEK ANDREW J.SHEA November 19, 2010 VIA HAND DELIVERY City Council Members City of Brooklyn Center c/o City Manager Curt Boganey 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Re: AMF Bowling Centers Inc. Liquor License Renewal Our File No.: 60709-0006 Dear Honorable City Council Members: I represent AMF Bowling Centers Inc. d/b/a AMF Earle Brown Lanes, which is a bowling center that holds an on-sale Class C intoxicating liquor license with the City. The renewal materials for its liquor license show that food-as-a-percentage-of-gross- sales was 34%, which is below the 40% to 49% required by the City for this class of license. Earle Brown Lanes will appear before you at the work session scheduled for November 22, 2010. The purpose of this letter is to outline the proposal for City Council consideration. Please note that 2010 is the first year in which Earle Brown Lanes reported food sales below 40%. Food sales within the previous five years ranged from 40% to 57%. As explained in the enclosed report, Earle Brown Lanes experienced some changes in 2010 that were unique in its history. The restaurant was renovated. Significantly, the restaurant hours were reduced to only four hours per day (4 - 8 pm). Management experienced turnover. Earle Brown Lanes believes that these items were unique to this year and expects food sales to increase significantly going forward. The business plan to increase food sales is detailed in the enclosed report. Earle Brown Lanes will launch the grand re-opening of its restaurant within the next few weeks. The restaurant hours will be expanded to nine hours per weekday (1 1 am - 8 City Council Members November 19, 2010 Page 2 pm) and eleven hours on weekends (9 am- 8 pm). It has retained a full-time, executive chef and prepared a new menu with extensive selections. A copy of the new menu is included in the report. Earle Brown Lanes is pleased to offer all-you-can-eat weekend brunch, as well as early bird food specials. Food will be served until the center closes each night. In light of these business changes, Earle Brown Lanes fully expects a significant increase in food sales. It is willing to report food sales to the City on a regular basis to monitor on-going compliance with the City's requirements. We are concerned that a denial of the liquor license would create a serious financial hardship, and perhaps require the closing of Earle Brown Lanes. Such a result would deprive the community of a valuable asset - more than the only bowling center in the City. Earle Brown Lanes is home to 714 League bowlers and 24 leagues, as well as an entertainment destination for child and adult birthday parties, corporate functions, holiday parties, and school and church groups. Earle Brown Lanes has invested in the community with its restaurant renovations, new food and bar equipment, and personnel changes. It hopes to remain in the City for many years to come. Earle Brown Lanes therefore requests that the City Council consider approving its liquor license renewal, contingent upon the following conditions: • Restaurant hours of at least 40 hours per week; • Continued extensive menu selections; and • Quarterly reporting of food sales to the City. We appreciate the opportunity to address the City Council and look forward to meeting with you on November 22nd. Sincerely, KV Kaela Brennan Enclosure cc (w/encl.): Charlie LeFevere, Esq. (City Attorney) (w/o encl.): Donna Arruda Darlene Newman-Brown it i Earle Brown Lanes November 2010 Earle Brown Lanes Who We Are: AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. is the world's largest owner and operator of bowling centers, with 299 centers in the United States. Over 20 million bowling enthusiasts a year choose AMF, bowling about 100 million games. Whether it's a birthday party, a company outing or just a spontaneous desire to go have some fun, AMF is where America goes bowling. Akl?ArF= :360- Earle Brown Lanes Our Center is a valuable part of the community. It is home to 714 League Bowlers, who bowl up to 32 weeks each year in a social sporting activity. We house 24 leagues that are sanctioned with the United States Bowling Congress, the sanctioning organization for the sport of bowling. In addition to our league bowlers, we offer a safe place for entertainment. Additional forms of entertainment include: Corporate Functions Child & Adult Birthday Parties School & Church Groups Team Awards Banquets Holiday Parties Social Events Recruiting Sessions Fund Raisers Community Groups AN1 F M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M i M = M Earle Brown Lanes Community Organizations and Businesses who use our Center: Medtronic Retired Brooklyn Center Teachers Honeywell North High School Coaches Minneapolis Public Works Dallas University Federal Reserve Mitchell Bus Station American Legion University of Minnesota Retirees Grocer's Union Lions Club ANI F Earle Brown Lanes — Parties for Children and Adults Customers • Children and families • Unique and highly interactive entertainment for both kids and adults • Events vary in type and size and range from birthdays - for both children and adults - sports team celebrations, holiday parties, and social events pthdayd Af • i r 1 ..t Need fun? Add bowling. A TA F �- M MM MM S i M MM M MM M M M S M Earle Brown Lanes — Control of Alcoholic Beverages AMF Centers Participate in TIPS: • TIPS (Training for Intervention Procedures) — Training on how to prevent intoxication, drunk driving and underage drinking • Offered through in-classroom sessions or online training • TIPS training includes: Behavioral Cues (visible, progressive signs of intoxication) Blood Alcohol Content (BAC, the level of alcohol in a person's bloodstream) Absorption Rate Factors (items that affect the absorption of alcohol) Effective Responses (intervention strategies for servers to use with guests) Checking IDs (proper formats and things to look for on an ID) Understanding Liability (explanations about how servers can be held responsible for alcohol-related problems) • AMF Earle Brown Lanes is presently 100% trained • Training compliance is tracked online All managers and employees in alcohol-related positions must be TIPS trained. • Any employee who violates the alcohol beverage service policy is subject to disciplinary actions including termination. p Y � g • No Alcohol violations within the last 7 years. AM F z \ Earle Brown Lanes Reason for Reduction in 2010 Food Sales : • Restaurant Hours Were Reduced Hours were Sunday — Saturday 4:00 PM — 8:00 PM • Renovations of the Restaurant • Management Turnover AJ7AF �W M M M M M M M M M M M M e M M Earle Brown Lanes Updates What's New and Improved . Food Sales Strategies New Expanded Restaurant Hours • Monday — Friday 11 :00 AM — 8:00 PM • Saturday & Sunday 9.00 AM — 8:00 PM New Executive Chef with extensive banquet experience New varied menu with new selections and a new look Early Bird Food Specials Offering All You Can Eat Weekend Brunch Food is served until center closing. Food can be ordered from the lanes and bar area in addition to the restaurant. Marketing to local hotels. AM F O- Earle Brown Lanes Updates (continued . . . ) What's New and Improved • Grand Reopening of Restaurant To occur within the next 2-3 weeks • Investments in Earle Brown Lanes New Lighting New Carpet — To be installed within next two weeks. New Interior Paint New Food & Bar Equipment New Management Advertising in Local Newspaper Partnership with the Brooklyn Center Historical Society Historical photos from the early 1900's with brass plate placards • Monitoring of Food & Beverage Ratio on Monthly Basis ,A�F= _ r r� �r r� �■r rr rr �r �r �r rr r rr rr rr r rr �■r �r The NEW EB's Grill at AMF Earle Brown Lanes is more than just a new name and logo . . . . . . BROOKLYN MINNEAPOLIS z . S Earle Brown Lanes Main Dining Room Before t After ,AMF Earle Brown Lanes Main Dining Room � s Before After �F Earle Brown Lanes Saturday & Sunday Buffet __ wool i Before After .o.M F Earle Brown Lanes Main Dining Room Before ' After 3bo- �F lllllllllq� I ME, Earle Brown Lanes New Menu Welcome dinner specials to EB's Grill [here W"d to PAWS.Fldua NTaro,F—I'Veq"A"tshd a ft"S" 10 oz Salon SteaK TraCAtional Spaghetti et started pizza, mizones&subs a ^�"°°pBl°° ' so �` $15 Tradltionat Spaghetti Chicken Parmesan With Meatbaills or Sausage Wngs A 610 F-Sh 2a 12.60.20 F7nurr 25.99 FamrY $1 210 ►ladtlry patbn nerved rrMfl Pasta stz walleye f,ay MOLareia Shdc3 bats eopPnp Gr*x9 Salmon Pm sawo w•h LOW&AW 5- 2e Persona.2.99•acr -array s i 2•�r � Served wKh Fyrp gAN1 313 tnea ShrrW I: wrp $14 68.90 56~.Her, ChicktoTefir.WS FV m wFPt.Budget,CnoMenAWXr,Wes,FWaChem. ShrwripSGampi W IfAwiptah•rtwr 6 87.99 gcvns.oums.Pidip rs,i tPoods,mud roar- Served*0 Gsrtc B1Mlier am Lrguru May fth Fry}•tom 7°"00 4yrrtl.A" $13 GTyc4er Gartrea Salad $599 (,iwore }, Shitmw ae Ctww•61 W lo sw is beVerW GrAod Chicken Ouetiyd•as top" 820 smi - - so~Pspvsrs►M"ene.-- ,rim $740 . Pmsspcb.Bryeb cerdtn.NThawu.bets Diodes D'EXA iMS Chir c*Cream 5U-00 �d A tioa 0 faodra o"aw,poppom aio[CA ww l itia", W Ch=bb0*Crib a*Ift Know am Pepin Papr 0.29 Feiner-212.00 Tairw,Scr,.a,Sao d bs CftW,ra Fudp and wr,•.a Cider 1sw AkN"tan DM %echo SLprw a Chicken iv KW yrn Met F*Aw•8.99' Fan*-60-99 SL4:* Ice�Aeern Sudae -W $4.w FLA I*.* s .W Ch—ink,Hal Ftope.SNSAN a MM0Pdt SD* Bred tarry:;pfti0.vmoiK Saasps W4 P"*4m.Tra4tsF VAd Mr 00q)W Cpsm end a 0" x I: 84.96 Mena C criesee.Riw C2ra w P&M,R A•" $3.50 CaMea HouS+e&-" (;Mn CtADW ChdW A gales OLT.RAVo Ctdsn added'eiw Waft Sundae Too 130 1�r pe $6.99 Hd Cfa(obte J")8nci POPPer` Lwk&..10"Ek.Fti,Iun- nts"W v faaa•chit -he Classir Barana F ! cad Too 68.50 PIPP0,11,►aararl Mori.Hal$eam.rt r Paeytsrts $A'" B Mwd Waex :rwgw burgers & chicken :xqo D, ,5 " 1% L _. s7.9� We Also hays a/u/I aarvyce bar.5 rng Wine.Ora/n Beer Pincher or Vint. WIe0 wsT L90X4,rdntsr0 S Pew', a»•yee sa/ecrwn o/Borc/en B.er and a/ten:e/echn or 5v1­r r Fr•Maa 4rardJa ner,br91iR kr a rrw•rer.Yrxar A, r r envars arinw,"a�lalz. The C4a2sk dwesra swy Garden&urger Served w+th hesh veoes kids cbmbo value meal 679D 61.99 on/.emr..,�.,� r ,/��>•o,., Ttw C.tassrc Burma Gr•HU Blacxened CIV'kan BraW. Only each $7$0 67.99 Gniled ... iTre SWISS.8aeiul.and KAxnroom Ltowr tiled Chckcsr Slidem Mo—arefla,Sticks 2p99 67.E the HAT f3rager GrI10d tlicken 81-1 wilt,11 rlfwy M1.1S781'n Spaghetti and Meatball Chicken JoncWs (099 NEW :3bO Earle Brown Lanes — Breakfast Menu The Deck Hand.................................................... ..............$ 5.99 Salors Breakfast Sampler..... ...........................................$ 7.99 Two aggS Cook:aiy stjie,served Y&hash brae"and W chote of 2 Ta eggs mkod to orcler.ho sausag-� i-lowes, Iv'n .tips z rd h'x pk,es of bawt,saisage links or patties. paqcaW,seaedw#4' h browns. TheScurvey.......................................................................$6.99 Breakfast sandw.nim chke of bacon, or satuge*12�hash browns&IG Earty Riser................................................................... 4.49 coffee or jj�e, ftw.,eggs ;;ny sl,o ie served voi-,h has.,;brow-is and-tour choice of Ms:. Sailor Delight 4,99 Two eggs cooked aN 910e.,MIM 2 pieces of t�icuii w ai�u your �noic! The Vcqetarian..................................................................$4.99 of toast. I'm suaz--ibecl egg beaters served with V tofnato patown and fresh sliced seal iri.l. TheEye Opener........................................... ......................$6.99 Two eggs ralokW to or ,two pancakes or Frencri tow 3, your cxice of mo Breakfast Treat ...................................................................$5.99 sausage links or crisp barn_ Breakfast ai 3 Paimktn or 4 French Toast or a Large Belgium Wattle Ham and Cheese Omelette................................................$6.99 01 :e of 2 pieces&&Can,Ham,or SauW 3-egg vnelleq� se ,=,: ,x.l and tow! Ala Carte Breakfast Items Cinnamli'Roll.................................... ...............................$2.99 Sausage Pathes(2)................................... ...........................$2.49 CrispBacon(3)...................................... .........................62.49 Grilled Ham...........................................................................$2.99 Sausage Links(3).............•....................................................S2,49 One Egg any style.................... ........ ....................................%1,25 EnglishMuffin.......................................................................S1.75 boast & J dly...... ................................. ...............................$1 A9 Bagel & Cream Cheese.................. ............................. ...52.49 Hash Browns............................ ............... .. ........... _........._.S1.99 AJ*F= Earle Brown Lanes Additional Marketing - Room cards are placed in all great pizza & wings served until midnight! local hotels offering pizza and AHaishle forpcap any wings for pick up at E B's Grill. pizza Pereonad-$6.99 Famiy-$12.99 Eadre toppkKW Personal-5.99 each,Famy-51.99 each Toppi mpK Sausage. l-bm Pineapple,Buffalo Chicken. Anchcross.Extra Cheese.Ricotta,Omens,Peppers, Bro"i Muehnxoms.Tomato,Spnach.Basi wings 1/2 dozen-56.99 1 dozen-$9.99 Saucer.Spicy Buffalo,BBO,ThEii Chii-Garic Hest. AW Eak Enaetaims ,AAMF. &WJanesCirdeNorth X1/7 isNbfF Bmliyn Center,ANSS430 �� p63J 4-630 AJZI r bo C � F= �i. E -- M