HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990 01-08 HRAP•
HRA AGENDA
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
JANUARY 8, 1990
(following adjournment of City Council meeting)
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Resolution:
a. Approving the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment
Authority Budget for the Year 1990 Pursuant to MSA
Chapter 469.033, Subdivision 6 and MSA Chapter 469.107,
Subdivision 1
4. Adjournment
•
•
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 1 /8 /90
Agenda Item Number 3 CZ.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
0 *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
EDA /HRA BUDGET FOR 1990
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
DEPT. APPROVAL:
v lc j T i EDA Coordinator
Signature - title
****************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ** * .. - * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report
•
Comments below /attached
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached
In 1989, the EDA/HRA completed a comprehensive analysis of Brooklyn Center's current housing
inventory and its projected housing needs. Upon completion of the housing study, the EDA started
the development of an implementation program /policy of the study. The 1990 EDA/HRA budget
reflects a proactive role and long -term commitment on the part of the EDA /HRA to the
redevelopment and revitalization of the community based upon the study and the implementation plan.
The EDA budget establishes a full -time assistant's position to the coordinator. The primary
responsibilities of the position will be the development of neighborhood coalitions to foster
neighborhood support and participation for neighborhood oriented housing programs. As an example,
this individual would be responsible for establishing first -time home buyers programs, low interest
rehab loans, neighborhood beautification projects, as well as other housing and redevelopment related
projects. The position would involve the acquisition of properties and their disposal.
A significant increase in professional services is also proposed. During 1990, the EDA will be
conducting a market analysis of the city's commercial and industrial base. In essence, the same type
of study just completed for housing. Upon completion of the industrial /commercial study, the EDA
would again use professional assistance in developing a policy /plan for the implementation of the
study. Combined with the housing plan, Brooklyn Center would then have a complete policy for the
redevelopment of the community. Professional consultant services are also contemplated for specific
project development plans.
The Earle Brown Heritage Center in terms of expenditures is the most significant part of the
EDA/HRA budget. By April 1990, the restoration of the site should be completed. Because this will
be the first year of actual operations on the farm, that part of the EDA/HRA budget attributed to
the Heritage Center represents our best estimates of anticipated costs. With actual operating
experience, future budgets for this operation will be more precise.
In 1990, the EDA /HRA will take a more active role in coordinating efforts to enforce Chapter 12
(Housing Maintenance) of the City's ordinances. Activities will include identifying chronic compliance
problems and eliminating the same. Also, the EDA /HRA will be completing its list of properties for
potential acquisition followed by restoration and /or demolition of existing structures.
I. Introduction:
Brooklyn Center Housing Implementation
Plan: Discussion Outline - First Draft
The City of Brooklyn Center is a first ring suburb whose
housing stock primarily serves the "entry level" market. The
City's approximately 12,000 housing units consist of 8,400
units being owner occupied and 3,600 being rental units. Of
the housing stock, 82% of all units were constructed prior to
1960. The City's 1988 population was projected to be 29,420,
or 6% below the 1980 census total. As a fully developed
city, Brooklyn Center has begun planning for the next decade
and century. Several studies have outlined goals and
objectives for the city. Among the studies is the May, 1989
study "The Brooklyn Center Housing market: A Study of Trends
and Their Impact on the Community." The study recommended
numerous strategies and policies for the city to review. The
strategies are grouped into three major categories
- for sale market
- rental market
- community livability
The strategies can be grouped by type of action. For
example, the strategies can be further grouped as:
- City involvement in the housing stock through such
activities as housing maintenance code enforcement,
and the provision of incentives and programs
- In cooperation with the county, school district,
board of realtors, and civic groups market and
promote the city and its schools.
The three general strategy types suggest a multiple city role
in preserving and developing its housing stock.
II. Current City Role in Housing
The City has taken an active role in preserving and
expanding its housing stock. Since 1980, the City has issued
tax exempt mortgage revenue bonds as well as approved several
multifamily revenue bonds. In addition, the City has
annually received $195,000 in community development block
grants (CDBG) and has levied for the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The CDBG funds have been used
for housing rehabilitation while levy funds have been used
for acquisition of substantial buildings.
The use of federal and local funds, and tax exempt bonds are
not the only means employed by the City. The City has
adopted and enforced a housing maintenance code, and requires
the licensure of all rental property owners.
III. Proposed City Involvement
The City's role in housing can include, but not be
limited to:
- policy development
- policy implementation
- housing developer (redeveloper)
- provider of financial incentives
- coordinator in framing programs available
from public and private agencies
Policy Development:
A.
B.
The City Council has adopted housing policies and must
discuss and debate policy in, at least the following policy
issues: (The issues are identified and subsequent sections
outline implementation strategies).
continued housing maintenance enforcement
truth -in- housing ordinance
advisory report
code enforcement
C. cooperative agreement with Minnesota Housing
Agency (MHFA) and their agencies regarding housing
rehabilitation and single family mortgage rather
than locally issued bonds
D. spot redevelopment program
E. - ~~ neighborhood development
southeast or city -wide
F. subsidized housing
- level of housing subsidized
- city role in preserving project based housing
use -of city financial resources
3
amount of use
type of use
- one time expenditures
leveraging -
matching
1
H.
occupied
conversion of single family rental to owner
I. multi- family preservation
- landlord technical assistance
- city as receivership administrator
- property acquisition and disposition
- role of non - profits
A. Housing Maintenance Enforcement
1. Role of Housing Inspectors as Providers of
Information regarding available housing programs
- preparation of an information brochure
- in- service training (annual session)
regarding programs and new legislation
2. Housing Inspectors and 1989 Legislation Regarding
Substandard Rental Housing
- legal analysis and training session
preparation of management process
coordination with assessor and Housing Court
- implementation in 1991
3. Licensure and Technical Assistance
- develop a fact book for rental housing owners.
Fact book can include information regarding:
- building maintenance
police and fire safety procedures
(book can be developed in conjunction with the
Multifamily Housing Association (MHA))
- sponsor training sessions for rental apartment
owners. (Alternative: require a management
plan including a process for tenant screening
as a condition for a license). Sessions can
include:
tenant screening
landlord rights
- housing court
- public financing programs
City can enter into an agreement with the MHA
to provide the sessions.
- encourage establishment of a building owners
alliance which could:
- exchange information
- provide a link to the City
- enter into joint contracts for services
such as:
develop "in house" capability to assemble
evidence for housing court presentations
police data
- require copy of housing inspection report to
be made available to tenants of the building.
Cost: To be determined
SL Truth -in- Housing Ordinance
tenant screening
- solid waste
- maintenance
- capital improvements
Purpose - Provide prospective home buyer with a report
on,the home's condition.
-
Report be advisory
- Report will be completed by licensed reviewers
- Report be basis for city assistance in
correcting certain conditions (emphasis on single
family units s now rented)
- Report be required for sale of all duplex and
single family units
Cost: Report to be a fee for service.
Property .owner pays for the report.
No direct city cost.
C. MHFA and City Cooperative Programs
1. General Operation
Y
- identify a local lender(s) willing to
originate loans and mortgages. (Community
Reinvestment Act requirements and city's
deposits prior involvement with MHFA
should be criteria in the identification
process)
- in cooperation with MHFA, Realtors,
neighborhood groups, and other civic groups
develop a marketing program. Elements of the
program can include
- housing information fair
- newsletters (City Manager)
- school sponsored programs
- media advertising and articles
- identify city staff person responsible to
liaison with MHFA and other agencies as well
as participate in marketing programs:
new staff person
- salary level
- funding source
2. MHFA Programs that Assist Cities and Require
Applications
- Communities Program - provides city with
access to mortgage bond funds to meet specific
goals. MHFA annually issues tax exempt
mortgage revenue bonds. The community's
program receives a set aside of mortgage funds
for cities to meet local housing goals that
are'compatible with the MHFA's criteria. $7.0
million is available annually and no one city
can receive $1.0 million:
Local Match: No
(See Appendix A for additional information.)
Application Time: anytime during the year
- Housing Preservation Grants - approved by the
1989 legislature, the program provides grants
to cities for establishing revolving loan
programs for the acquisition improvement or
rehabilitation or residential buildings. The
grant must be used in a specific area of the
city that meets the following requirements:
- 70% of the housing units are at least
35 years old
60% of single family housing is owner
occupied
- average market value of homes in the
area's owner occupied housing is not more
than 100% of the purchase price of MHFA's
existing purchase limits
- the geographic area must be contiguous
committee
Laca1_ Match: Yes. - _ $1 to $1
Eligible local match sources:
- general fund or special fund
- federal grants
- foundation grants
public improvements
- bond issuance costs
- fees from community development activities
Advisory Committee: City must establish a
Available State Funds: $1.5 million
Date of Availability: Announcements: February 1990
Grants: July 1990
- Neighborhood Preservation Loans - provides property
improvement loans for preserving designated
neighborhoods. Eligible borrowers include owners
of rental property who rent to low and moderate
income tenants, nonprofit groups :, low and moderate
income persons and families. -Up to 25% of the -
funds to a neighborhood may be loaned to entities
not meeting the criteria.
Local Match: 25% local; 75% state
Amount Available: $10.0 million
Date of Availability: Announcement - February 1990
Awards -July 1990
Local Match Use: interest writedown, insurance
reserve or neighborhood
preservation activities
3. MHFA Programs that are Individual Property Oriented
The following MHFA programs are available to
individual property owners: the City, however,
should consider proposing to MHFA that a portion of
the program be included in the neighborhood loan or
communities program. In effect, the City should
request a set- aside.
- Purchase Plus - provides borrowers with the
ability to raise funds to simultaneously
purchase and rehabilitate, or refinance and
rehabilitate existing housing through a single
mortgage. Targeted neighborhoods can be
included. Local subsidies can be used to
write down costs.
Local Match: No
Available State Funds: $10.0 million
Program Availability: July 1990
- Rental Rehabilitation Loan Program - provides low -
interest financing for making energy conservation
and other basic improvements to rental residential
property.
Implementation: Local.
Participation of two organizations, administering
entity and lender, is needed. Administering entity
can be a public or non - profit agency which
- identifies properties
- recruits a lender
- assists owner
acts as escrow agent
Amount Available: $1.0 million
- Rehabilitation Loans. The MHFA offers a variety of
rehabilitation loans and grants. Some of the
programs encourage local participation. Among the
programs are:
- local participation home improvement loans
- home improvement loans
- home energy loans
- deferred loans
- revolving loans
- Federal Programs. The federal housing initiatives
are being reevaluated and it is probable that 1989
pending federal legislation will change the federal
housing policy. Despite the federal review of its
housing programs, there are two programs that could
assist the city with rental housing:
- Section 108 Loan Guarantee.
Provides communities with front -end financing
for development projects that cannot be
financed from annual grants. Section 108 is a
loan guarantee program. The maximum guarantee
is three times the applicant's annual
entitlement. The principal security for the
ZPa ,.is the applicant's annual entitlement
amount.
Loan guarantees can be used for real property
acquisition, rehabilitation of publicly owned
property, housing rehabilitation and CDI3G
eligible activities.
In fiscal year 1988, $144 million was the
federal limit. It is possible that under
pending legislation the 108 program can be
eliminated.
Section 223(f) Existing Multifamily Rental
Housing.
This program permits the purchase or
refinancing of existing apartment projects.
It also allows for purchase and conversion of
an existing rental project to cooperative
mortgage insurance program. The project must
contain at least five units and must be at
least three years old. Eligible applicants
include HRA, non - profits, builders,
developers, and investors.
Private. Resources.
The central cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul have
been able to develop housing with the assistance of
grants from the McKnight Foundation. The two
cities ;. have established the Twin Cities Housing
fund. The City of Brooklyn Center as an inner ring
city adjacent to Minneapolis exhibits the similar
housing problems. The city should consider:
discussing with the Foundation the possibility
of. private : assistance in suburban communities
- presenting a proposal for a housing initiative
to a private foundation
- Spot Redevelopment.
City is currently acquiring with local funds
individual parcels considered to be blighted., or in
need of substantial rehabilitation. Acquired
properties are disposed to developers for new
construction on rehabilitation. The city estimates
that approximately 60 to 80 properties could be
acquired over the next three to five years. The
city should review the program with the following
issues to be discussed:
- Use of Tax Increment Financina (TIF)
A scattered site TIF project could be
established as either a redevelopment or
housing district. The district would need to
meet the criteria established in the 1989
amendments. Such criteria include
restrictions on use of income or income of the
owner occupants ($44,000 /year). Assuming a
$40,000 base value for a homestead $400 tax
capacity) and a new homestead at $80,000
($920), and a 100% tax rate, the increment
would be $500. For 60 parcels, the maximum
increment per year could be $30,000.
- Recapture of Subsidy
The city will usually dispose the property at
cost lesser than the acquisition cost. To
recover all or a portion of the subsidy it
could in combination with TIF or separately
require the new homeowner to reside there for
at least 5, 7, or 10 years. If there is a
sale prior to the minimum residence period, a
portion of the equity can be paid to the city
as payment for the "up front" costs. The
portion paid to the city.
- Design Guidelines
The city as part of this program and other
housing initiatives in target neighborhoods,
should offer exterior design guidelines. The
guidelines can emanate from such sources as:
- design competition among local architects
provision of architectural services
- citizens advisory committee working with
selected architect(s)
- other
- Developer: City or Contractor
Some public agencies, Minneapolis and Dakota
County, have or are building single family
houses on publicly owned lots. The Dakota
County program builds on tax forfeit property
while Minneapolis is contemplating a renewal
of its program. In Dakota County, the HRA has
acted as both general contractor or has hired
a general contractor.
- Program Financing (Housing Units)
Construction loans can be obtained from
available public funds or the issuance of
construction loan notes that are permitted
E. Neighborhood Renewal
_under_.chapter.469. Dakota County has issued
such notes:' - Permanent mortgage financing is
completed with tax exempt mortgage bonds.
The Maxfield report suggests that the city develop and
implement a concentrated renewal program in the
southeast neighborhood. In structuring such a program,
the following issues are used:
Citizen Involvement
A citizen's planning council must be established.
The council can assist in program development as
well as marketing program. The city should
consider developing or at least have the capacity
to have a city -wide citizen involvement program.
Public Improvements
A possible incentive for individual home
improvements could be public improvements such as
curb and gutter. The improvements could be
installed if the neighborhood indicates a
--, willingness for individual investment. Another
type of public improvement that could stimulate
investment would be construction of the pathway
system
Cost: -::To be determined
Funding Sources: HRA, EDA, or block grant CoV)
Subsidized Housing
The.:Maxfield report's total number of multifamily
rental-units approximates 3600. There are 708
subsidized rental units in the city, of which 538
are Section 8; The remainder are 236 or 221 d3
projects. The Section 8 units include 385
certificates and 153 project based units. Of the
city's rental units, section 8 represents 15% of
the total rental units. The policy options
available-to the city are limited but could
include: -
advocacy for a regional fair share plan
incentives to cities having a large number of
subsidized units. Such incentives can include
priority for MHFA programs, and other state
programs, and increased state aids
• H.
G. Use of City Financial Resources
Available resources to the city include
- HRA levy - $130,000 /yr
- EDA levy - $180,000 /yr
- CDBG - $195,000/yr
- Fund Balances in EDA or HRA N/A
The city can also issue bonded debt for
- Tax increment
- housing bonds (essential function)
- redevelopment activities
Operating principles for the use of city funds should
- leverage other funding sources
- recycle funds through revolving loan funds
- recapture all or a portion of the subsidy
- combine funds where needed to stimulate the program
- be accounted for in a development account
Conversion of single family rental to owner occupied
housing
The city should implement a program to encourage
conversion from single family rental to homeownership.
Elements of a program could be:
- identify annually with the assistance of the
assessor and county auditor single family rental
rental properties (As part of its technical
assistance role, the urban county should be
requested to provide such a service.)
write to property owners and renters informing them
of the city's rental to owner program
- conduct the required housing maintenance code
inspection
- provide the owner and renter with a copy of the
report
work with MHFA to provide a set -aside for home
improvement loans to the absentee owner so that
their property will be more salable. If the loan
is paid from the sale proceeds, the loan is
interest free.
set aside tax exempt bonds for mortgages
- develop a deferred loan process for down payment
assistance
- work with realtors to market the program
Preservation
(To be completed. Research regarding receivership
statute is not complete and meeting with non - profit
groups.)
>t>
BROOKLYN CENTER: SUBSIDIZED HOUSING
The following information regarding the city's
subsidized bousing was suppied by the Metropolitan Housing
and Redevelopment Authority, HRA. (The date available is of
October 28, 1989)
Table I: Project based Section 8, Section 236, Section 221D3
Housing by unit size and mortgage.
City of Brooklyn Center
Project Total Units Bedrooms Mortgage Type
1 2 3 . 4 5
Emerson Chalet 18 6 12 0 0 0 MHFA Section 8
Ewing Square 23 0 0 16 7 0 MHFA Section 8
Ponds 112 0 59 53 0 0 MHFA Section 8
Shingle Creek 122 77 45 0 0 0 HUD 236
Victoria Town
Homes 48 0 0 48 0 0 HUD 221 D3
TOTAL 323 83 116 117 7 0
The Shingle Creek project can prepay its mortgage as early as
1994 while the Victoria project has a 2001 prepayment date.
In addition to the project based units, the city also
participates in the Section 8 voucher or contract program.
The Metropolitan HRA administers the program, Table II
presents contract information by applicant type.
Table II: Section 8 contracts by Type of Applicant:
City of Brooklyn Center, October 28, 1989
Type Number % Total
Elderly 73 19.0
Handicapped 13 3.4
Disabled 17 4.4
Family 282 73.2
TOTAL 385 100.0
In addition to type, the Metroloitan HRA reports the average
annual income of applicant.by type and family size. Table
III present income information.
Table III: Annual Income by Type and Family Size
City of Brooklyn Center, October 28, 1989
Family Size
Type 1 2 3 4 5
Elderly $ 8021 $ 8954 - -
Handicapped $ 5750 $ 9274 - -
Disabled $ 6531 $ 7757 - -
Family $ 11,232 $ 7397 $ 8817 $ 13,741 $ 10,452
(EHRABDGT)
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment Authority
has considered the attached budget and finds that this budget is necessary
for the operation of the Brooklyn Center Housing and Redevelopment Authority
during the year 1990:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority for the City of Brooklyn Center that the attached budget of
the Economic Development Authority for said City is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution, together
with the attached budget, be submitted to the City Council of the City
of Brooklyn Center.
Passed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City
of Brooklyn Center this 8th day of January, 1990.
Date
HRA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE BROOKLYN CENTER HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 1990 PURSUANT TO MSA CHAPTER
469.033, SUBDIVISION 6 AND MSA CHAPTER 469.107, SUBDIVISION 1
President
The motion for the adoption of the forgoing resolution was duly seconded
by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.