Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989 10-23 CCP Regular Session1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Open Forum CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER OCTOBER 23, 1989 7 p.m. 5. Approval of Consent Agenda -All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 6. Presentation: a. Patricia Hoyt Neils, School Board Chair - School District 281 Referendum 7. Approval of Minutes: a. October 9, 1989 - Regular Session 8. Resolutions: *a. Supporting Continued Hennepin County Funding for Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council *b. Amending the 1989 General Fund Budget and Accepting Proposal to Furnish Transparencies of Aerial Photography Covering the City of Brooklyn Center . Accepting Proposal to Provide Base Mapping Data for Improvement Project No. 1989 -26 - This mapping is needed to facilitate development of conceptual plans for the improvement of the Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue /66th Avenue corridor between Shingle Creek and T.H. 252 d. Accepting and Approving Environmental Assessment Worksheet Relating to the Reconstruction of 69th Avenue between Dupont Avenue North and the West City Limits (Brooklyn Center Improvement Project. No. 1987 -08) Declaring a Public Nuisance and Ordering the Removal of Shade Trees (Order No. DST 10/23/89) f. Accepting the Bid of Norstan, Inc. to Provide a Telephone System for the City Hall /Civic Center Complex and the Earle Brown Heritage Center *e. • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Accepting the Bid of Telecom North for Cabling for a Phone System for the City Hall /Civic Center Complex and the Earle Brown Heritage Center h. Relating to a $8,100,000 Commercial Development Refunding Revenue Note (Brookdale Two Limited Partnership Project); Authorizing the Issuance Thereof Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152- 469.1651 g. -2- October 23, 1989 9. Ordinances: (7:30 p.m.) a. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 of the Brooklyn Center Ordinances Regarding Liquor - This item was offered for a first reading on September 11, 1989, published in the City's official newspaper on September 20, 1989, and was offered for a second reading on October 9, 1989. The ordinance was continued to this evening's meeting to coincide with the second reading of an additional amendment to the ordinance. b. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 of the Brooklyn Center Ordinances Regarding Liquor - This item was offered for a first reading on September 25, 1989, published in the City's official newspaper on October 4, 1989, and is offered this evening for a second reading. This amendment would allow for a class E liquor license which would allow hotels to dispense liquor for no more than two hours a day to their guests. c. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 of the Brooklyn Center Ordinances Regarding Liquor - This amendment will allow Class C liquor license holders an additional 12 -month period to bring their food /liquor split into compliance. (This item is offered this evening for a first reading.) 10. Discussion Item: a. West River Road Improvement Project No. 1988 -18 - Staff will be prepared to discuss several items for which decisions are needed in order to allow completion of construction plans for this project. b. Brooklyn Center Priority List Status c. Drug Awareness Task Force *11. Licenses 12. Adjournment • CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:01 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Celia Scott, Todd Paulson, and Philip Cohen. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Works Sy Knapp, Finance Director Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning and Inspection Ron Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, City Assessor Mark Parish, and Administrative Aide Patti Page. Mayor Nyquist noted Councilmember Pedlar would be absent from this evening's meeting. INVOCATION The invocation was offered by Jim McCloskey. OPEN FORUM Mayor Nyquist noted the Council had not received any requests to use the open forum session this evening. He inquired if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council. There being none, he continued with the regular agenda items. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Nyquist inquired if any Councilmembers requested any items removed from the consent agenda. No requests were made. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 21. 1989 - SPECIAL SESSION There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Paulson to approve the minutes of the September 21, 1989, City Council meeting. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTIONS MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION OCTOBER 9, 1989 CITY HALL RESOLUTION NO. 89 -191 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE OF LARRY PROPST The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 89 -192 10/9/89 -1- Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE OF SCOTT BURNES The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 89 -193 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTE AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) AIR BOTTLE SYSTEM FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 89 -194 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO DEVELOP PLANS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS TO COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 152 (BROOKLYN BOULEVARD) BETWEEN 49TH AVENUE NORTH AND TRUNK HIGHWAY 100 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 89 -195 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF SHADE TREES (ORDER NO. DST 10/09/89) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. LICENSES There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Paulson to approve the following list of licenses: COMMERCIAL KENNEL Children's Palace 5900 Shingle Creek Pkwy. FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Metropolitan Yogurt, Inc. d /b /a TCBY Yogurt ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Brooklyn Harmonettes St. Alphonsus Catholic Church MECHANICAL SYSTEMS 10/9/89 - 2 - 6034 Shingle Creek Pkwy. 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy. 7025 Halifax Ave. N. • • • Equipment Supply Inc. 593 N. Fairview Ave. Key Metalcraft 8201 Pleasant Ave. S. TAXICAB Suburban Taxi Corporation 9614 Humboldt Ave. S. The motion passed unanimously. PRESENTATION - NEW PROPERTY TAX LEGISLATION The City Manager introduced Gene Ranieri of Publicorp, Inc. Mr. Ranieri went on to review the changes which were made in the special session for property tax legislation. He noted there have been significant changes to the law, and at this time it is difficult to assess what those changes are. He went on to review the summary of the special property tax legislation which was prepared by Publicorp, Inc. The EDA Coordinator entered the meeting at 7:25 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 25. 1989 - REGULAR SESSION There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Paulson to approve the minutes of the September 25, 1989, City Council meeting. The motion passed. Councilmember Scott abstained from the vote as she was not present at this meeting. RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED) The City Manager presented a Resolution Accepting and Approving Proposal to Provide Traffic Engineering Services Relating to Proposed 1990 Improvement Projects. He noted staff is recommending employment of Short- Elliott- Hendrickson, Inc. to provide traffic engineering analysis and preliminary design services as necessary to allow development of a plan for the improvement of the Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue /66th Avenue corridor between Shingle Creek Parkway and T.H. 252. RESOLUTION NO. 89 -196 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND APPROVING PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATING TO PROPOSED 1990 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Requesting Transfer of Title for One Parcel of Tax - Forfeited Land on Appraisal List 705 -NC to the City of Brooklyn Center. He noted this is approximately eight acres of land adjacent to Kylawn Park and Moorewood Townhomes which has become available to the City. The Director of Public Works went on to review a transparency which showed the location of the property. Mayor Nyquist inquired why this property became tax - delinquent. The Director of Public Works stated there are poor soil conditions in this area, and it lies within the flood plain. He noted while it would not be a good use for town homes, it would work quite well for park uses. 10/9/89 -3- RESOLUTION NO. 89 -197 Member Philip Cohen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION REQUESTING TRANSFER OF TITLE FOR ONE PARCEL OF TAX - FORFEITED LAND ON APPRAISAL LIST 705 -NC TO THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Denying the Rental Dwelling License for 5500 Bryant Avenue North. The Mayor noted a public hearing was held on September 25, 1989, to review this item, at which time the applicant did not appear before the Council. He inquired if there was anyone present this evening who wished to address this issue. Mayor Nyquist recognized Wendy Aaserud, 5507 Bryant Avenue North. Ms. Aaserud stated she lives directly across from the property and was not aware of the public hearing held on September 25, 1989. She stated she read about the action in the Brooklyn Center PostNews and strongly supports any action the City takes. She explained exterior maintenance of the building and grounds have been a problem for a long time, and she is ashamed of the way the neighborhood looks because of this property. She inquired if the Council denies the rental dwelling license, how long will the building be left in this condition. The City Manager explained in the past when this action has been taken, the net result has been either the owner repairs and maintains the building or the building and property go down hill a little further until the owner can sell it and a new owner takes over and maintains the property better. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Cohen to approve the resolution with an amendment which would reflect the appearance of a neighbor at this evening's meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 89 -198 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION DENYING THE RENTAL DWELLING LICENSE FOR 5500 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Philip Cohen, and the motion passed unanimously. ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER ORDINANCES REGARDING LIQUOR The City Manager noted this item was offered for a first reading on September 11, 1989, published in the City's official newspaper on September 20, 1989, and is offered this evening for a second reading. He explained an additional amendment was considered for a first reading at the September 25, 1989, meeting, and staff is recommending this evening's public hearing be opened and continued to the October 23, 1989, meeting so the two amendments can be considered at the same time. 10/9/89 -4- • • • • Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on An Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 of the Brooklyn Center Ordinances Regarding Liquor. He inquired if there was anyone present who wished to speak. No one appeared to speak. There was a motion by Councilmember Paulson and seconded by Councilmember Scott to continue the public hearing on An Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 of the Brooklyn Center Ordinances Regarding Liquor to October 23, 1989. The motion passed unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF RENTAL DWELLING LICENSE FOR 6525. 27. 29 WILLOW LANE The City Manager noted a public hearing has been scheduled this evening for consideration of a rental dwelling license at 6525, 27, 29 Willow Lane. The Director of Planning and Inspection went on to review the report submitted for this evening's meeting which details the past actions taken with regard to this rental dwelling license. He noted on October 10, 1988, staff recommended approval of the license renewal upon the condition the property be reinspected within one year, and a report be given to the City Council on the status of the property. He explained the Council accepted the recommendation and reinstated the license at this time. He then went on to review what has been taken care of since the reinstatement of Mr. Ketroser's license and noted there has not been a marked improvement within the past year. He stated he could not recommend approval of the license but strongly recommends revoking this rental dwelling license. Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on consideration of a rental dwelling license for 6525, 27, 29 Willow Lane. He inquired if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council. Mayor Nyquist recognized Irwin Ketroser, owner of the property and applicant for the rental dwelling license. Mr. Ketroser stated he would personally like to see this matter resolved. He stated he has met with, and spoken with, the inspector's office quite often, and he feels he has taken care of more of the problems in the complex than what is being represented this evening. He stated in the past he has had problems with the caretakers, but he now has a new caretaker and he feels this person will be able to follow through and get the problems taken care of. He noted many of the problems which the Planning Department has listed are brought on by the tenants themselves and their misuse. He noted he felt it would be unfair for the Council to revoke the license this evening, and he felt the Council should allow him a reasonable period of time in which to complete the improvements. Mayor Nyquist stated he is concerned that it takes a meeting of this nature to get results from the owner. Mr. Ketroser stated he and the caretakers have been very busy all summer, and some of these projects cannot be completed in a short period of time. Councilmember Cohen asked Mr Ketroser to review the process he uses for prospective tenants. Mr. Ketroser went on to review the process which he and the caretaker uses on prospective tenants. Mayor Nyquist recognized Vicki Snyder, 6408 Willow Lane. Ms. Snyder stated she is concerned with the exterior appearance and maintenance of the complex and also the lack of supervision of children living in the buildings. She noted these children are running out into the street in front of cars. 10/9/89 -5- Mayor Nyquist then recognized Gerald Heck, 6506 Willow Lane. Mr. Heck stated he feels the staff report is accurate and noted he is concerned with the flurry of activity so late in the year. He inquired why this activity did not occur earlier in the summer. He noted his other concerns are the care of the lawn and the screening process which Mr. Ketroser uses for prospective tenants. Mayor Nyquist then recognized Margaret Dahlen, 6518 Willow Lane. Ms. Dahlen stated she believes there has been more deterioration of the buildings in the past year rather than improvement. She noted there has been a flurry of activity in the last month and noted she too is concerned with all the trash around the grounds and also with the children's safety because there is nothing for them to play on and, therefore, they play in the street. Mayor Nyquist recognized Rod Snyder, 6408 Willow Lane. Mr. Snyder stated the residents on the east side of Willow Lane work hard towards improving the area and making their property look nice, but the apartment owner does not appear to care what the building or yard looks like. Mayor Nyquist then recognized Tom Aust, 6500 Willow Lane. He stated he has noticed a deterioration in the property over the past ten years. He stated he has been trying to sell his home for three years, and several realtors have pointed out the appearance of the apartment buildings discourages many prospective buyers. Mayor Nyquist recognized Alvin Flynn, 6512 Willow Lane. Mr. Flynn stated ten to twelve years ago this was a very well maintained apartment complex, but it has steadily gone downhill. He stated he believes if the Council renews this rental license, the owner will go back to his old ways and allow further deterioration. He stated if there are ordinances in place to address maintenance issues, then the ordinances should be enforced. He added he too has been trying to sell his home since July, but the apartment complex is such an eye sore it is discouraging prospective buyers. Mayor Nyquist recognized Andra Blanc, 6354 Willow Lane. Mr. Blanc stated he agrees with the Director of Planning and Inspection's assessment of this property and added he feels these apartments are a disgrace to the neighborhood. Mr. Blanc stated he feels empathy for what the owner is going through because it is difficult to maintain a building when you have residents who abuse the property, but he feels because of the location near the river, it could be a prime piece of real estate if it were well maintained. Mayor Nyquist recognized Philip Dahlen, 6518 Willow Lane. Mr. Dahlen said the condition of the grounds surrounding the building is very poor, and he is concerned with children playing in the street as well as heading across his property toward the river. Mayor Nyquist recognized Irwin Ketroser. Mr. Ketroser stated he has listened very carefully to the neighbors, and he respects what they are saying. He stated he is not blaming others for the problems that exist at the apartment complex, and he accepts full responsibility for them. He stated, however, he does not understand what the neighborhood thinks will be accomplished if the license is revoked. He added he also does not know what the neighborhood thinks he can or should do regarding the children playing in the street. He noted their behavior is the responsibility of their parents, not his. He added he would be glad to keep in contact with the neighborhood regarding their concerns and his progress on the improvements. 10/9/89 -6- • • • • • There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Cohen to close the public hearing on consideration of a rental dwelling license for 6525, 27, 29 Willow Lane. The motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Cohen stated it seems the recommendation of the Director of Planning and Inspection does dictate the need for some action to be taken this evening. He stated he feels some of these issues could be addressed by a better screening process of prospective tenants. He added he also feels the owners track record speaks for itself. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Scott directing staff to prepare a resolution denying the rental dwelling license for 6525, 27, 29 Willow Lane. Councilmember Cohen stated he would like staff to prepare a list of the items which need correction and an approximate dollar figure for this correction. He inquired if it would be possible to require the property owner to post a bond for the improvements, or is it possible for the court system to order the improvements. The City Attorney stated he would have to review the ordinance more thoroughly, but he believes these violations are considered a misdemeanor under the ordinance and could be taken care of through the court system. Councilmember Scott stated she sympathizes with the new caretakers because they have walked into a total mess. However, she stated she does not sympathize with Mr. Ketroser because he knew the improvements were needed, and he should not have been relying on a second party but should have personally been watching over these improvements. Councilmember Paulson stated he was thankful for the neighborhood's support this evening and noted it helps him to get a better feel for what the citizens want. The City Manager stated the development of estimates will take a little extra time but noted he felt a resolution could be prepared for the November 13, 1989, City Council meeting. He stated he would also have staff look into the issue of the owner posting a bond for the improvements. Upon vote being taken on the foregoing motion, the motion passed unanimously. RECESS The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 9:10 p.m. and reconvened at 9 :26 p.m. CONTINUATION OF BUDGET HEARING The City Manager stated due to the changes made in the legislature, he would recommend closing the public hearing this evening. He noted it would be necessary to hold another public hearing in early December, and staff would notify the Council of the proposed date in the near future. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Paulson to close the public hearing on the 1990 annual City budget. The motion passed unanimously. 10/9/89 -7- OTHER BUSINESS The City Manager presented a Resolution Establishing Improvement Project No. 1989 -29 for Cleanout of Unity Avenue Culvert and Authorizing City Manager to Execute Contract for Said Improvement. The Director of Public Works briefly reviewed the proposed agreement and minor changes which needed to be made to the agreement. RESOLUTION NO. 89 -199 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1989 -29 FOR CLEANOUT OF UNITY AVENUE CULVERT AND AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT FOR SAID IMPROVEMENT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing proclamation was duly seconded by member Philip Cohen, and the motion passed unanimously. PROCLAMATION Member Philip Cohen introduced the following proclamation and moved its adoption: PROCLAMATION DECLARING OCTOBER 15 -21, 1989, AS NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S WEEK The motion for the adoption of the foregoing proclamation was duly seconded by member Todd Paulson, and the motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Scott to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 9 :35 p.m. City Clerk Mayor 10/9/89 -8- • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 10/23/89 Agenda Item Number qa/ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 0 *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CONTINUED HENNEPIN COUNTY FUNDING FOR NORTHWEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL.: No comments to supplement this report Personnel Coordinator Signature - tftte ***************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * ** * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: Comments below /attached **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached The Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council (NWHHSC), a planning and coordinating agency for human services in northwest Hennepin County and supported financially in part by the City of Brooklyn Center and other northwestern suburbs, is in jeopardy of losing 45 percent of its operational budget. Hennepin County Administrator Dale Ackmann has presented a budget to the county commissioners that will totally eliminate funding by the county (over $70,000) for community planning and citizen participation activities of the council. The NWHHSC is asking for the city council's support in requesting the Hennepin County commissioners to continue its funding of this viable agency. Please see the attached memo that explains in more detail what the impact of such reductions will be. REQUESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Pass a Resolution, Supporting Continued Hennepin County Funding for Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CONTINUED HENNEPIN COUNTY FUNDING FOR NORTHWEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL WHEREAS, the Human Services Councils have been jointly funded since 1973 by member municipalities and Hennepin County to meet the suburban human service planning needs; and WHEREAS, the need for planning and coordinating services in the suburbs continues to be very important to meet human service needs of growing suburban populations; and WHEREAS, these planning and coordinating activities help to coordinate fragmented service delivery systems, create cost - effective services, and avoid duplication, thus benefiting all parties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center strongly supports ongoing Hennepin County Community Planning and Citizen Participation funding for the Northwest Hennepin Human Service Councils. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center recommends the County review the total County budget and reduce across the entire County budget rather than entire budgets for human services and contracted agencies. ATTEST: Date Mayor Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. HELP US NOW... SO WE CAN CONTINUE TO HELP YOU The Hennepin County funding for Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council will be totally cut in 1990, unless supporters from our communities can convince the County Commissioners otherwise. This means that Northwest Hennepin Human Services will no longer be able to: * speak on behalf of Northwest Hennepin area residents * work on initiatives to develop needed services in our communities * inform the community about available human services and human service issues * plan for meeting the human service needs of our friends and neighbors * coordinate an effective and cooperative human services system * assure that consumers and other area residents have a voice in decision making through a citizen participation process and we will no longer be able to leverage funds for the: * Northwest Hennepin Surplus Commodities Program * Northwest Hennepin Community Outreach Forums * Northwest Hennepin Emergency Services Program * Suburban Hennepin Affordable Housing Collaborative * Northwest Hennepin Runaway Youth Initiative If you feel that... * Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council assists the communities to better meet the human service needs of the people who live here * Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council plays an essential and important role assisting residents and consumers in defining their own problems and recommending their own solutions * the suburban municipalities should have an organizational link with Hennepin County for planning and developing human services * Hennepin County should continue its support for the Human Services Councils (All of the Suburban and City of Minneapolis Human Service Councils Planning and Coordination and Citizen Participation, activities have been recommended to be totally cut by the Hennepin County Administrator) Northwest Hennepin ',Trooklun • Prenklun2ark Champlin IJJJ. 1,ir4.I I •Hano>`er Haswn A -fame Ljrotie - !Ve>r • Human Services Council 2: arr i.•,aroinatrng Human Sery ices IF YOU DO ... YOU CAN HELP BY: WRmNG, CALLING, OR VISITING COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO EXPRESS YOUR SUPPORT Please see other side for County Commissioners addresses and phone numbers. For more information, contact Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council, 7601 Kentucky Avenue North Suite 101, Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 or call 493 -2802 (voice or TDD) HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Jeff Spartz, 1st District 348 -3085 Randy Johnson, 2nd District 348 -3086 John Keefe, 3rd District 348 -3087 John E. Derus, 4th District 348 -3088 Tad Jude, 5th District 348 -3084 Sam S. Sivanich, 6th District 348 -3082 Mark Andrew, 7th District 348 -3080 Mailing address for all County Commissioners: (Name), A -2400 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN 55487 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 10/23/89 Agenda Item Number S b REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION III ****************************************************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1989 GENERAL FUND BUDGET AND ACCEPTING PROPOSAL TO FURNISH TRANSPARENCIES OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY COVERING THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: * * * * * * * * * * ** ***APP ,4* ** * ** R * * * ** PUBLIC * * **** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report City Council Action Required P «- p x1A 1 A:i' .. i✓ t Y Comments below /attached *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: Explanation (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) In April of 1989, the aerial mapping firm of MARKHURD Corporation contracted with Hennepin County for county -wide aerial photography. Using this photography, MARKHURD has proposed to furnish, to the City, 9" x 9" black and white transparencies covering all of Brooklyn Center. These transparencies are ideal for overhead projections of areas under various engineering or planning considerations. The transparencies would be delivered in individual sleeves and stored in the Engineering Department files. The estimated cost of providing these transparencies is $2,280.00. Copies of the memorandum from City Engineer Mark Maloney and proposal from MARKHURD Corporation are attached for reference. A resolution approving acceptance of the proposal from MARKHURD Corporation is provided for consideration by the City Council. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1989 GENERAL FUND BUDGET AND ACCEPTING PROPOSAL TO FURNISH TRANSPARENCIES OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY COVERING THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, Section 7.09 of the City Charter of the City of Brooklyn Center does provide for a contingency appropriation as a part of the General Fund Budget, and further provides that the contingency appropriation may be transferred to any other appropriation by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has recommended that transparencies of aerial photography be prepared to aid in conceptual planning and engineering considerations; and WHEREAS, MARKHURD Corporation has submitted a proposal to provide 9" x 9" black and white transparencies of aerial photography covering all of the City of Brooklyn Center for an estimated fee of $2,280.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota: ATTEST: 1. That the 1989 General Fund Budget be amended as follows: Increase the Aonrooriations for the following line items: Engineering - No. 41, Object No. 4310 $2,280.00 Decrease the Appropriations for the following line items: Unallocated Dept. Expense - No. 80, Object No. 4995 $2,280.00 2. That the proposal submitted by MARKHURD Corporation is hereby accepted and approved. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract with said firm to conduct the proposed study in accordance with the proposal. Date Mayor Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. YID • • CITY OF B ROOKLYN C ENTER TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works FROM: Mark Maloney, City Engineer DATE: October 17, 1989 RE: Aerial Photography Services for Resurfacing Project Freeway Boulevard /65th,66th Ave. N. I have reviewed MARKHURD's proposal to provide aerial photography services for the above - referenced project. A copy of the proposal is attached for your inspection. I have been assured that the product they will provide is fully compatible with our Apollo /UltiMap workstation. Ben Verbick @ LOGIS has been in contact with Mr. McClanahan of MARKHURD to elaborate on the specific requirements of the project. As a result of the photography, we will get data accurate enough to create construction plans @ 1 " =50' scale, and cross sections 300' either side of centerline. City forces will provide more accurate cross section data for the areas within the road right -of -way. Also described in the proposal is the preparation of 9 "x9" black and white transparencies covering the entire city. This service cannot be charged directly to any project, therfore, we should propose to ammend the 1989 Budget by transferring $2,280.00 from Unallocated Funds to Division 41. The schedule for services as explained in the proposal is acceptable only if we get started right away. Providing ground control for MARKHURD and supplementing the cross section data must be accomplished before there is permanent snow - cover. Therefore I recommend that we accept MARKHURD's proposal as soon as possible to ensure data collection yet this year. These services will be charged against Project 89 -26, Freeway Boulevard /65th Ave. No., as preliminary engineering costs. Approved By: 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 - 5440 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works • IN REPLY, REFER TO: E -6188 Mr: Sy Knapp 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Dear Mr. Knapp: Area Aerial Photography Transparencies Ground Control CORPORATION 345 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 TELEX: 290 -474 MARKHURD GOVY • TELEPHONE: (612) 545 -2583 September 20, 1989 Reference is made to our phone conversation of September 12, 1989. Accordingly, we are pleased to present our proposal for aerial survey services in Brooklyn Center, MN. Details of our proposal are described below.. Our understanding of the area is indicated in red on the attached copy of the USGS 7 -1/2 minute quadrangle map. We estimate the area is approximately 6,500 feet in length. Please examine these limits carefully, and unless changes are indicated on the prints returned with the acceptance copy of this proposal, we will understand the limits are correct. We will use aerial photography covering the above described area at a scale of approximately 1" =500'. This photography was flown in April, 1989, with a precision mapping camera and is suitable for preparing maps. Map content will be as of that date. Using the photography described above, we will prepare 9" x 9" black and white transparencies. These transparencies will be placed in individual sleeves, and will be at an approximate scale of 1" =500'. We estimate that it will require ±38 transparencies to obtain physical coverage of the City of Brooklyn Center. It is understood that your forces will furnish the necessary control for mapping. We will supply you with a set of aerial photographs indicating the location and description of the points for which we require position, and points for which we require elevations. • • MARIONLIRD CORPORATION Mr. Sy Knapp September 20, 1989 - page 2 Photogrammetric Cross Sections After the centerline geometry has been established by your office, we will set the photogrammetric models and read cross section data at 50' intervals along the centerline, plus breaks in the terrain and reaching 300 feet each side of the centerline. We will deliver the information on magnetic tape containing the appropriate X, Y and Z information, with a printout. Performance Schedule We will furnish your forces a set of aerial photographs indicating the control requirements within 10 days after receipt of notice to proceed. The time required to deliver the completed mapping will depend, to some extent, upon our work load when completed ground control is furnished. However, we estimate that delivery can be made within 20 days after its receipt. Payment Our charge for the services described above will be as follows: 1. Cross sections $4,840.00 2. 9" x 9" transparencies 60.00 each Payment of our invoice will be due within 30 days after delivery and invoicing. We will invoice as each item is delivered. When using control information provided by other than our own forces, an additional charge of $40.00 per hour will be made for excess office time, if any, due to erroneous control information. We appreciate the opportunity of furnishing this proposal, and if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Receipt of your purchase order based on this proposal will serve as our contract and notice to proceed. KWM:PAF enc. Very truly yours, ! MC_ enneth W. McClanahan Technical Representative • • • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 10/23/89 Agenda Item Number FC REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE BASE MAPPING DATA FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1989 -26 *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: . SY KNAPP`DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ********* ********"**************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *0 * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Explanation Also attached is a proposal from MARKHURD Corporation to provide this data. This firm has provided aerial mapping services to Hennepin County and most of its constituent municipalities and has an excellent reputation nation -wide. *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) At the 9/25/89 Council meeting the Council gave tentative approval to several 1990 improvement projects, including several improvements along the Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue /66th Avenue corridor between Shingle Creek Parkway and T.H. 252. It is the recommendation of the staff that base mapping data be obtained to facilitate improvement plans for this corridor. Attached is a memorandum from City Engineer Mark Maloney describing the use of this base mapping data. Council Action Required Comments below /attached A resolution accepting and approving the MARKHURD Corporation proposal is provided for consideration by the City Council. • • • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE BASE MAPPING DATA FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1989 -26 WHEREAS, the City Council has tentatively approved the development of preliminary plans, reports and cost estimates for several proposed 1990 improvement projects; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has deemed it prudent to obtain base mapping data to facilitate development of conceptual plans for the improvement of the Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue /66th Avenue corridor between Shingle Creek Parkway and T.H. 252, which will be compatible with the neighborhood, yet provide an adequate level of service for traffic within that corridor; and WHEREAS, the firm of MARKHURD Corporation has submitted a proposal to provide the needed base mapping data and the City Council finds said proposal to be appropriate and acceptable. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: ATTEST: 1. The proposal submitted by MARKHURD Corporation to provide the needed base mapping data for these improvements at an estimated total cost of $4,840 is hereby accepted. 2. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into contract with MARKHURD Corporation to provide the required services in accordance with their proposal. 3. The costs for providing base mapping data shall be charged to the Municipal State Aid Fund, Account No. 2613, in conjunction with the proposed improvement projects for which those services are provided. Date Mayor Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF B ROOKLYN C ENTER TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works FROM: Mark Maloney, City Engineer DATE: October 17, 1989 RE: Aerial Photography Services for Resurfacing Project Freeway Boulevard /65th,66th Ave. N. I have reviewed MARKHURD's proposal to provide aerial photography services for the above - referenced project. A copy of the proposal is attached for your inspection. I have been assured that the product they will provide is fully compatible with our Apollo /UltiMap workstation. Ben Verbick @ LOGIS has been in contact with Mr. McClanahan of MARKHURD to elaborate on the specific requirements of the project. As a result of the photography, we will get data accurate enough to create construction plans @ 1 " =50' scale, and cross sections 300' either side of centerline. City forces will provide more accurate cross section data for the areas within the road right -of -way. Also described in the proposal is the preparation of 9 "x9" black and white transparencies covering the entire city. This service cannot be charged directly to any project, therfore, we should propose to ammend the 1989 Budget by transferring $2,280.00 from Unallocated Funds to Division 41. The schedule for services as explained in the proposal is acceptable only if we get started right away. Providing ground control for MARKHURD and supplementing the cross section data must be accomplished before there is permanent snow - cover. Therefore I recommend that we accept MARKHURD's proposal as soon as possible to ensure data collection yet this year. These services will be charged against Project 89 -26, Freeway Boulevard /65th Ave. No., as preliminary engineering costs. Approved By: 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works • IN REPLY. REFER TO: E -6188 Mr. Sy Knapp 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Dear Mr. Knapp: Area Transparencies Ground Control MR1.0.1.1fLD, CORPORATION 345 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 TELEX: 290 -474 MARKHURO GOVY • TELEPHONE (612) 545 -2583 September 20, 1989 Reference is made to our phone conversation of September 12, 1989. Accordingly, we are pleased to present our proposal for aerial survey services in Brooklyn Center, MN. Details of our proposal are described below. Our understanding of the area is indicated in red on the attached copy of the USGS 7 -1/2 minute quadrangle map. We estimate the area is approximately 6,500 feet in length. Please examine these limits carefully, and unless changes are indicated on the prints returned with the acceptance copy of this proposal, we will understand the limits are correct. Aerial Photography We will use aerial photography covering the above described area at a scale of approximately 1" =500'. This photography was flown in April, 1989, with a precision mapping camera and is suitable for preparing maps. Map content will be as of that date. Using the photography described above, we will prepare 9" x 9" black and white transparencies. These transparencies will be placed in individual sleeves, and will be at an approximate scale of 1" =500'. We estimate that it will require ±38 transparencies to obtain physical coverage of the City of Brooklyn Center. It is understood that your forces will furnish the necessary control for mapping. We will supply you with a set of aerial photographs indicating the location and description of the points for which we require position, and points for which we require elevations. • ARKHURD CORPORATION Mr. Sy Knapp September 20, 1989 - page 2 Photogrammetric Cross Sections After the centerline geometry has been established by your office, we will set the photogrammetric models and read cross section data at 50' intervals along the centerline, plus breaks in the terrain and reaching 300 feet each side of the centerline. We will deliver the information on magnetic tape containing the appropriate X, Y and Z information, with a printout. Performance Schedule We will furnish your forces a set of aerial photographs indicating the control requirements within 10 days after receipt of notice to proceed. The time required to deliver the completed mapping will depend, to some extent, upon our work load when completed ground control is furnished. However, we estimate that delivery can be made within 20 days after its receipt. Payment Our charge for the services described above will be as follows: 1. Cross sections $4,840.00 2. 9" x 9" transparencies 60.00 each Payment of our invoice will be due within 30 days after delivery and invoicing. We will invoice as each item is delivered. When using control information provided by other than our own forces, an additional charge of $40.00 per hour will be made for excess office time, if any, due to erroneous control information. We appreciate the opportunity of furnishing this proposal, and if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Receipt of your purchase order based on this proposal will serve as our contract and notice to proceed. KWM:PAF enc. Very truly yours, M (.. C- enneth W. McClanahan Technical Representative • • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 1 n/21/R9 Agenda Item Number 0 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET RELATING TO THE RECONSTRUCTION OF 69TH AVENUE NORTH BETWEEN DUPONT AVENUE NORTH AND THE WEST CITY LIMITS (BROOKLYN CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -08) *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: 1 SY KNAPP DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ****** *********** 14 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * :• * * ** * ** * r _.._- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) Explanation No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached The City Council has previously adopted two resolutions regarding the proposed reconstruction of 69th Avenue North, between Dupont Avenue North and the west City limits: o The first resolution, dated April 20, 1987, approved a contract for engineering services for this project with Short - Elliott- Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). o The second resolution, dated April 10, 1989, designated the City of .Brooklyn Center as the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for development of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for that project. SEH has initiated work on the design of this project and they have now completed the following work items: preliminary cost estimates have been developed for five alternative designs for the intersection of 69th Avenue North and Shingle Creek Parkway. 2. the EAW has been completed (copy enclosed). Additionally, City staff has substantially completed the "6(f)" process relating to the possible realignment of 69th Avenue North in Palmer Lake Park. The EAW must now be released for public review and must be submitted to other governmental units and agencies for their review and comment. A resolution approving the EAW and ordering its release and submittal is provided for consideration by the City Council. • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: ATTEST: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET RELATING TO THE RECONSTRUCTION OF 69TH AVENUE NORTH BETWEEN DUPONT AVENUE NORTH AND THE WEST CITY LIMITS (BROOKLYN CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -08) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, acting as the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU), has declared that a discretionary Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) be prepared in accordance with rule 6 MCAR s 3 of the Environmental Quality Board (EQB); and WHEREAS, the EAW has now been prepared and has been submitted to the City Council for consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. the EAW is hereby received, accepted and approved; 2. a press release shall be issued; and 3. distribution of copies of the EAW shall be made to other governmental units and agencies as determined by the Environmental Quality Board. Date Mayor Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. .. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET IMPROVEMENTS TO THE 69TH AVENUE CORRIDOR FROM THE WEST CITY LIMITS TO DUPONT AVE. NO. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA • • • L • • • E. R. # (filled in by EQB) MARK APPROPRIATE BOX: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) (X( REGULAR EAW 1 1 SCOPING EAW NOTE TO REVIEWERS: For regular EAWs, written comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the EAW information, potential impacts that may warrant investigation and /or the need for an EIS. For scoping EAWs, written comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information and suggest issues for investigation in the EIS. Such comments must be submitted to the Responsible Government Unit (RGU) during the 30 -day period following notice of the EAW's availability in the EQB Monitor. Contact the EQB (metro: 612/296 -8253: non - metro: 1- 800 - 652 -9747, ask for environmental review program) or the RGU to find out when the 30 -day comment period ends. 1. Project Name Improvements to the 69th Avenue Corridor from the West City Limits to Dupont Avenue North. 2. Proposer City of Brooklyn Center Contact Person Sy Knapp Director of Public Works Address 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Phone (612) 561 -5440 4. Project Location: S 1/2 Sections 25 -28, N 1/2 Sections 33 -36, Township Y 119 Range 21 a. County Name Hennepin City /Township Name Brooklyn Center b. Attachments 1. General Location Map, Exhibit 4.b.1 2. USGS Map, Exhibit 4.b.2 3. Project Site Plan, Exhibits 4.b.3, (1 -23) 4. Existing Zoning 4.b.4 5. Soil Classifications, Exhibit 15 6. Air Quality Analysis Receptor Sites, Exhibit 23 7. Air Pollution Table, Exhibit 23a. 1 Phone 3. RGU City of Brooklyn Center Contact Person: Sy Knapp and Title (See Left) Address • • 8. Noise Table, Exhibit 23c. 9. Section 6(f)(3) Area, Exhibit 27a. ! 10. Estimated Average Daily Traffic, Exhibit 28.1 (a,b,c) 11. P.M. Peak Hour Estimated Volumes, Exhibit 28.2 (a,b,c) 5. Describe the proposed project completely (attach additional sheets as necessary). The proposed project includes a portion of 69th Avenue approximately 2.75 miles in • length from Dupont Avenue on the east to the west city limits. The corridor skirts Palmer Lake Park area which includes protected wetlands and many park amenities. A number of roadway operational deficiencies exist within the corridor. There are safety concerns related to the curvilinear alignment near Palmer Lake Park. Operational concerns include inadequate lane provisions at major intersections, • possible traffic control needs, and geometric deficiencies. There are also overall concerns regarding the lack of provisions for turning movements to other streets or adjacent developments. 69th Avenue is primarily a two way two lane road which was originally designed to a typical rural county road section. As development has occurred, this section is i becoming increasingly inadequate in handling the traffic movements. A significant portion of the roadway is approaching the end of its design life and reconstruction and rehabilitation are being considered. A Traffic Operations Study (SEH, Inc. - March 25, 1988) found that significant operations deficiencies are likely at Zane Avenue (approximately .25 miles west of Brooklyn Center /Brooklyn Park boundary), France Avenue and Shingle Creek Parkway in the future unless improvements are made to 69th Avenue. The existing operational problems at Brooklyn Boulevard would also deteriorate without improvements. In addition, the horizontal alignment of 69th Avenue at Palmer Lake Park is not consistent with the alignment in the remainder of the corridor. The curved alignment together with several intersecting streets and the volume of traffic creates an unsafe situation. 0 • • • The improvements proposed for 69th Avenue North include grading, curb and gutter, bikeway /walkway, and surfacing. Said improvements are included in three different sections. Projected traffic volumes can be served with a three lane section (one lane in each direction with a continuous left turn lane) from the west city limits to Brooklyn Boulevard. Lanes will be added at Brooklyn Boulevard to increase capacity of the intersection. The 69th Avenue /Shingle Creek Parkway intersection will be realigned to favor the major traffic movements and a (to be determined) section is proposed from Brooklyn Boulevard to Shingle Creek Parkway. An upgraded, existing two lane section is proposed from Shingle Creek Parkway to Dupont Avenue North. All major intersections will have turn lanes. Where not currently existing, a bikeway /walkway is proposed along of 69th Avenue to separate pedestrians and recreational bicyclists from traffic. The segment from Brooklyn Boulevard to Shingle Creek Parkway carries a significantly higher volume of traffic and three lane or five lane alternates are being considered. These alternatives would require additional right -of -way. Minor changes in alignment are being considered and are illustrated in this report along with the estimated right -of -way requirements. - 2 - • Improvement of the alignment of 69th Avenue at Palmer Lake would move the road • slightly into Palmer Lake Park. The section 6 (f)(3) conversion process for park lands has been initiated to insure that the park land can be replaced and that there will be no issues in realigning 69th Avenue if the project moves forward. Realigning 69th Avenue would not impact DNR protected wetlands, but would require the development of new "compensating storage" capacity for any fill material placed within the Palmer Lake flood fringe area. Fill material related to identified • Corps of Engineers wetland will be based on specific design elements of the project and applicability of the Section 404 permit process. Any necessary Corps mitigation measures will be undertaken. In relation to a "do- nothing" alternative, it can be stated that the 69th Avenue corridor will continue to experience deficiencies in handling existing as well as • future traffic volumes and movements. Current alignment deficiencies as well as intersection issues will continue to be a problem on a roadway which has not undergone significant improvement since its placement years ago as a typical county road section. • • • • In summary, the proposed improvements to 69th Avenue North are geared toward improving the Level of Service (LOS) for the major intersections, improving traffic safety by providing left turn lanes and limiting access points, and improving pedestrian and bicycle safety by providing a bikeway /walkway away from the roadway. In addition, existing alignment deficiencies will be eliminated by flattening curves and moving slightly into Palmer Lake Park. A Section 6(f) park land conversion process has been initiated and is included by reference in this EAW. 6. Reason for EAW preparation: Discretionary List all mandatory category rule #'s which apply: N/A 7. Estimated Construction Cost: If either of the five lane alternates is selected, the total cost of the proposed improvements is $6,768,000. A cost breakdown follows: Right Segment of -Way Construction Engineering West City Limits to Brooklyn Blvd. $ 0 $1,110,000 $108,000 Brooklyn Blvd. to Shingle Creek Pkwy. $2,100,000 $1,800,000 $200,000 Shingle Creek Pkwy. to Dupont Ave. $ 0 $1,300,000 $150,000 $2,100,000 $4,500,000 $500,000 3 Total $1,218,000 $4,100,000 $1,450,000 $6,768,000 • 0 If the three lane alternate is selected, the total cost of the proposed improvements is $5,253,000. A cost breakdown follows: Segment West City Limits to Brooklyn Blvd. Brooklyn Blvd. to Shingle Creek Pkwy. $ 815,000 $1,600,000 Shingle Creek Pkwy. to Dupont Ave. $ 0 $1,300,000 $ 815,000 $4,300,000 8. Total project area (acres) 9. Number of residential units N/A or commercial, industrial, or institutional square footage N/A 10. Number of proposed parking spaces N/A 0 11. List all known local, state and federal permits /approvals /funding required: LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT TYPE OF APPLICATION STATUS Federal: National Park Service State: Corps of Engineers Minnesota Department of Trade & Economic Dev. Minnesota DNR Local: Shingle Creek Watershed Commission Right of -Way Construction Engineering $ 0 $1,110,000 $108,000 $170,000 Section 6 (f)(3) Parkland Conversion 1. Drainage Facilities 2. Section 404 Section 6(f)(3) Parkland Conversion Drainage Facilities Drainage Facilities 4 $150,000 $470,000 Total $1,218,000 $2,585,000 $1,450,000 $5,253,000 or length (miles) 2.75 miles Applied for/ Approval Given To be applied for To be applied for (If Applicable) Coordination/ Project Agreements To be applied for To be applied for i • • • LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT TYPE OF FUNDING County: Hennepin County County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Assistance Local: City of Brooklyn Center 1. Special Assessments in Accordance with MN. Statute 429. 2. Public Utility Fund. 3. General Fund. 4. Municipal State -Aid Funds 12. Is the proposed project inconsistent with the local adopted comprehensive land use plan or any other adopted plans? X No Yes If yes, explain: 13. Describe current and recent past land use and development on and near the site. Current adjacent land uses are residential (largely single - family and a small portion multi - family) with the exception of commercial areas near Brooklyn • • Boulevard, light industrial near Shingle Creek Parkway, park land on the north side from west Palmer Lake Drive to Oliver Avenue North (Palmer Lake Park) and neighborhood commercial development at Humboldt Avenue. 14. Approximately how many acres of the site are in each of the following categories? (Acreages should add up to total project area before and after construction.) Before After Before After Forest /Wooded Wetland (Types 3 -8)* 3.65 1.24 Cropland Impervious Surface 8.9 ** 12.9 Brush /Grassland Other (Specify) • * Corps of Engineers Wetland, Construction Dependent on Specific Roadway Design and Fill. ** Based on Five Lane or Three Lane Alternatives for Brooklyn Boulevard - Shingle Creek Parkway. 15. Describe the soils on the site, giving the SCS soil classification types, if known. The majority of soils on site belong to the Hubbard - Isan -Duelm Association. These soils are a loamy sand or sandy loam underlain by a sandy soil. The soils are generally well drained but include some poorly drained, broad flat areas. The classification types are DP, IS, and HbB. A significant portion (i.e., west of • Palmer Lake Drive to west city limits) contains CV (cut and fill) soils 5 • • This project will not impact the 100 year floodway. However, some fill materials will be placed in the Palmer Lake 100 year flood plain fringe area. Compensating storage will be calculated and provided. 19. Describe any physical alteration (e.g., dikes, excavation, fill, stream diversion) • of any drainage system, lake, stream, and /or wetland. Describe measures to minimize impairment of the water - related resources. Estimate quantity of material to be dredged and indicate where spoils will be deposited. Existing drainage ditches are anticipated to be filled with the proposed curb and gutter improvements to 69th Avenue. Drainage will be incorporated into the City of Brooklyn Center's storm sewer system. A portion of the project will require construction of outflows to the Palmer Lake basin. The project is not anticipated to impact DNR wetland. However, minor alteration to Corps of Engineers wetland will require any applicable Section 404 permit requirements and associated mitigation measures. Specific quantities of dredged • and fill materials as well as location of deposited spills will be calculated and submitted in the more detailed design phase of the project. 20. a. Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water? • characteristics of urban development in the area. There also exists Ma (Marsh) soils related to the Palmer Lake Park area of the project corridor. These soils are organic in nature. Borings will be taken to verify soil conditions. Note Exhibit 15. 16. Does the site contain peat soils, highly erodible soils, steep slopes, sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, abandoned wells, or any geologic hazards? If yes, show on site map and explain: No X Yes A portion of the project corridor relates to an alignment adjustment of 69th Avenue slightly into Palmer Lake Park. Peat soils are noted in this area (note soils map). Soil borings taken in the mid - sixties in conjunction with a walkway construction project found peat depths ranging from three to twenty -nine feet. As mentioned, soil borings will be undertaken in the more detailed design phase of the subject project which will measure actual depth of peat in the determined roadbed area. Soil correction and /or the use of geotextile techniques will be implemented. 17. What is the approximate depth (in feet) to: a. Groundwater 1' -2' min >6' avg b. Bedrock _ min _ avg [greater than 50']. 18. Does any part of the project area involve: a. Shoreland zoning district? X No Yes b. Delineated 100 -year flood plain? No X Yes c. State or federally designated river land use district? X No Yes X No Yes 6 • • • Areas disturbed by construction will be landscaped, reseeded, sodded or paved during the construction phase. Erosion control will be in accordance with the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission requirements, the State of Minnesota erosion control requirements and any other applicable city, county or state requirements. 22. a. Will the project generate: 1. Surface and stormwater runoff? No X Yes 2. Sanitary wastewater? X No Yes 3. Industrial wastewater? X No Yes 4. Cooling water (contact and noncontact? X No Yes • If yes, explain (indicate quantity and source): b. Will the project affect groundwater levels in any wells (on or off the site? X No Yes If yes, explain: 21. Describe the erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after construction of the project. During construction, erosion and storm water runoff will be controlled with silt fences, interceptor ditches and hay bale ditch checks. If yes, identify sources, volumes, quality (if other than normal domestic sewage), and treatment methods. Give the basis or methodology of estimates. Stormwater runoff will be conveyed by additions and connections to the existing City of Brooklyn Center storm sewer system and outflow lines to the Palmer Lake drainage basin. Drainage facilities permits will be applied for to the Minnesota DNR and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Consistency with the City of Brooklyn Center's Comprehensive Plan and Shingle Creek Watershed Management Plan will be followed: b. Identify receiving waters, including groundwater, and evaluate the impacts of the discharges listed above. If discharges to groundwater are anticipated, provide percolation /permeability and other hydrogeological test data, if available. Both the Palmer Lake basin and ultimately the Mississippi River receives all stormwater runoff. The 69th Avenue drainage network will have a curb and gutter directional system replacing the existing shoulder and ditch areas. Any required detention ponding will be designed and incorporated into the drainage system. Directional storm sewer flow to the Palmer Lake basin or existing lines with outflows to the Mississippi River is anticipated. 7 ' • • 1 23.a. Air Pollution To insure the provisions of a healthy air quality environment, a number of potential sensitive receptor locations were analyzed along the 69th Avenue Corridor. These sites are illustrated in Exhibit 23. The 69th Avenue Corridor provides access to many differing abutting land uses such as low and medium density residential units, commercial, recreational and light L1� industrial uses. The most potentially sensitive receptors in the project vicinity are located near the intersection with France Avenue. At this location, the road alignment alternatives shift north or south of the existing alignment. The model parameters and traffic volumes were chosen to produce forecasts CIA) of elevated carbon monoxide levels resulting from the poorest air quality conditions which might exist. Ultimate future traffic volumes for years 1997 and 2007 were used for all analysis. Vehicle emission rates for year 1997 and 2007 were calculated from a base emission rate and correction factors from the model. These calculations were performed using the Mobile 4 microcomputer program. The emission rates were calculated '� to be: 1989 - 18.6 grams /vehicle -mile 1997 - 10.5 grams /vehicle -mile 2007 - 8.6 grams /vehicle -mile The assumptions used to compute the emissions were: EMISSION ASSUMPTIONS Temperature 20 Degrees Fahrenheit Vehicle Class Mix: 23. Will the project generate (either during or after construction): a. Air pollution? No X Yes b. Dust? No X Yes c. Noise? No X Yes d. Odors? X No Yes If yes, explain, including as appropriate: distances to sensitive land users: expected levels and duration of noise; types and quantities of air pollutants from stacks, mobile sources, and fugitive emissions (dust): odor sources; and mitigative measures for any impacts. Give the basis or methodology of estimates. Percent Cold Starts - 20 Percent No platooning of vehicles assumed 97% Light Duty Vehicles 2% Light Duty Gas Trucks 1% Heavy Duty Gas Trucks No Diesel Trucks • • • • • • The receptor sites are all single family homes located immediately adjacent to 69th Avenue. The roadway design is not anticipated to significantly change near receptors 1 and 7. Receptors 2 thru 5 were chosen to represent various conditions for the realignment alternatives. Exhibits 4.b.3(3) to 4.b.3(8) illustrate example cross sections taken just east of the France Avenue intersection. Dispersion modeling was performed using the Caline 3 computer program. The dispersion assumptions used were: Wind Speed Wind Angle (BRG) Stability Class Mixing Height Averaging Time Surface Roughness Settling Velocity Deposited Velocity DISPERSION ASSUMPTIONS 1.0 Meter /Sec (2.24 mph) Variable (based on worst case) D (Neutral) 1000 Meters (3267 ft) 60 Minutes 200 Centimeters 0 centimeters per second ▪ 0 centimeters per second A conservative ambient carbon monoxide concentration of 4.0 ppm (1 -hour) and 2.0 ppm (8 -hour) were used for existing and future analysis periods. The analysis of air quality at the receptors found that the projected concentrations are barely over the assumed ambient values (see Exhibit 23a). These values are considerably less than the state 1 -hour standard of 30 ppm. Using a typical persistence factor of 0.7, the equivalent average 8 -hour CO concentration was well below the state standards of 9 ppm. One potential air quality problem area does exist at the intersection of 69th Avenue with Brooklyn Boulevard (T.H. 152). A couple of years ago Mn /DOT analyzed a number of metropolitan intersections including this intersection. The computer model identified potentially high carbon monoxide concentrations. Recent discussions with Mn /DOT Environmental Staff has found that: • The computer modeling was performed for sidewalk along Brooklyn Boulevard. ▪ If the analysis was performed today using Mobile 4 vehicle emissions, significant improvements would be anticipated. ▪ This location has not been monitored to determine the current levels of carbon monoxide concentrations. The proposed project does not include modifications to Brooklyn Boulevard. However, the reconstruction of 69th Avenue will improve the overall intersection operations by improving the geometrics on 69th Avenue. - 9 - • • Based on this analysis, no mitigating measures are anticipated to be required. • • • 23.b Dust 23.c Noise During construction, airborne particulate fugitive dust emissions will temporarily increase. All available mitigation measures will be employed to reduce the dust emissions from the construction activities. The mitigating measures will include the watering of areas undergoing grading or earthmoving, planned selective grading and staged development, timely job site cleanup and haul road maintenance. Construction noise impacts were considered. Most of the construction activities which will generate the most noise (grading, heavy truck hauling, etc.) will be of fairly short duration. The impact of construction noise can be minimized by restricting the activity hours and by ensuring that the construction equipment is properly muffled. Future projected traffic volumes carried by the roadway will be a potential source of noise. The area along 69th Avenue is anticipated to experience some redevelopment after the corridor is improved. Currently, many if riot most single family residences to not meet the city setback requirements for a collector roadway like 69th Avenue. The city fully intends to insure that redevelopment and other changes along the corridor meet the setback requirements. Berming and landscaping treatments (similar to Exhibit 4.b.3(6) or Exhibit 4.b.3(8)) will be used wherever possible. The final result will be to increase the distance between homes and the roadway, thereby reducing the noise sensitivity. The current and future daytime noise levels have been calculated and they are shown in Table 2 (Exhibit 23c). Under current conditions, the noise levels have been estimated to be within relative compliance with state standards. Relative means that some locations may be experiencing elevated levels which are slightly over the standards but are no more than 3 dBA higher. Generally a noise level less than 3 dBA in difference is not perceptable to the human ear. Receptors 1 and 2 are exceptions where the L values may be significantly exceeded. From a future noise standpoint, Alternate A (Realignment to the South) is better than Alternate B (Realignment to the North) which is better than expansion on the existing centerline. Realignment would permit extensive berming and landscaping which is not possible within the existing right - of -way. Regardless of the alternative which is chosen, most of the projected noise levels are estimated to be within state standards. - 10 - • . 24. Describe the type and amount of solid and /or hazardous waste including sludges and ashes that will be generated and the method and location of disposal: 40 25. Will the project affect: a. Fish or wildlife habitat, or movement of animals? X No Yes b. Any native species that are officially listed as state endangered, threatened, or of special concern (animals and /or plants)? X No Yes If yes, explain (identify species and describe impact): 26. Do any historical, archaeological or architectural resources ® exist on or near the project site? (If yes, explain (show resources on a site map and describe impact): X No Yes 27. Will the project cause the impairment or destruction of: a. Designated park or recreation areas? No X Yes • b. Prime or unique farmlands? X No _ Yes c. Ecologically sensitive areas? X No Yes d. Scenic views and vistas? X No _ Yes e. Other unique resources (specify)? X No Yes If yes, explain: d • A portion of the project entails a realignment of 69th Avenue slightly into Palmer Lake Park. Because the park involves Land and Water Conservation Fund (L & WCF) monies, a Section 6(f)(3) conversion process has been initiated and applied for to the National Park Service (NPS). Coordination with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development (outdoor recreation program) has been undertaken in identifying 7.5 acres of replacement park land adjacent to Kylawn Park in Brooklyn 41 Center. Approximately 3.44 acres of land within Palmer Lake Park has been identified for the 69th Avenue realignment area. Approval has recently been given by the NPS for this conversion with the understanding that the bicycle trail in Palmer Lake Park displaced by the realignment will be relocated onto other land in the park. • 28. For each affected road indicate the current average daily traffic (ADT), increase in ADT contributed by the project and the directional distributions of traffic. Exhibits 28.1a to 28.1c and 28.2a to 28.2c illustrate the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes for existing (1989), 1997 and 2007. Existing traffic counts, future land use projections and Mn /DOT and Hennepin County 41 future traffic forecasts were studied and used as a guide to produce future ADT's and peak hour volumes. 29. Are adequate utilities and public services now available to service the project? If not, what additional utilities and /or services will be required? No X Yes N/A • SUMMARY OF ISSUES For regular EAWs, list the issues as identified by "yes" answers above. Discuss alternatives and mitigative measures for these issues. For scoping EAWs, list known issues, alternatives, and mitigative measures to be addressed in EIS. 16. The peat soils removed within the roadbed area will be disposed of at specified locations either on private property or within embankments outside the roadbed. Soil correction and /or use of geotextile techniques will be implemented. 18b Compensating storage will be calculated and provided for fill materials placed in the Palmer Lake 100 year flood plain fringe area. 22a The storm water runoff will be confined to the roadway and discharged through the City of Brooklyn Center's storm sewer. Drainage facilities permits will be applied for to the Minnesota DNR and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers related to outflows to the Palmer Lake Park basin area. In addition, storm water runoff will be mitigated by conformance with the City of Brooklyn Center's Comprehensive Plan and the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission requirements. 23a b,c See attached statements. Any additional issues can be mitigated by compliance with City and State Agency permits. 27a Park land will be replaced as part of Section 6(f)(3) conversion process which has been applied for and approved by the National Park Service. Coordination and review by the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development (outdoor recreation program) has been undertaken. Mitigation includes 7.5 acres of replacement land adjacent to Kylawn Park in Brooklyn Center. CERTIFICATION BY RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT I hereby certify that the information contained in this document is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and that copies of the completed EAW have been made available to all points on the official EQB distribution list. Signature i/ Title Director of Public Works Date October 19, 1989 - 12 - •• • • • • • ATTACHMENTS " I ' X , ••••.`': t '' \\\, ,,441 • e, J OVC.Aft'Eirt'S 1 0.,,C4NNIY, PROJECT AREA "r I-sty t w 0 C.1.41M 1•1•41&"4 , RockKr.xN " 1' „ , .. "1,-• >210 . • X • * k‘tt t •••• .1;ot'. • .• r . 4-';•1 „p....._ ,;,;,•.-.4,_ „,„..,..s.• .. - . f— • 1,-- , ,. ,„,..• -, Iii ;1 i :: . — , •-... '..‘‘. .,:.. '.:., .. ..;..., . A, '4. ..w.. : i -.•\'\ ” i i ' ..s .,,,:.„ ,,,, e e 7 • 7 ,,, , . . ...7` -• 4.;:ti f... ;.:4,4,: i :•,-, ;: •‘ •■•:• 4 ....".:'" --- - - "'.."• - ...=- - ::-...,.. . . ::=7,". " \ •1" ' i i •• s -"•` ". •N\ ' • '''', \\ . K 1 . 1 4 t•I•sttt, : ' i• 14., ,..3 . 1 g ..! i • el ""4 . A f i..- !I , Y 4 'Al " --. :".'94-,,',N...:. \,. • q ?'f "---<,‘„... 4 4 . • EXHIBIT 4.b.1 /f4.,4 i>A43 • NeteltIKYIX DIMIkbattr ISAXISICIC=Citl 1110:30111M UM= MulOur TAIPAIMEM or IlltiMOME110141 UNIMIAY AZIOXIMCISIt toisatevAirstrailt • GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP 1 HENNteui COUNTY IVIDA OM 'Los t•nt * ; BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA lo, mol•••••••••••••••••■• rii • • • • r•IAS 117S511Y 13M N701113N1 r IA1 11100N1 r7Ar NOlai; 11•7AY 1N33NI1 4'7A1 NYn,NSi: 111A• 333717 'N r0 y '7AV Y A r Mail • � r •IA� atois� N 'IM OYii 147A• 411"3141 It 3A1 NIYO 1 '741 04403 • NN Ulm 1144713 ▪ '1AS S7w YO • /'1A• •N, ION1 N •IAI 7,11v • 11'1+q 1010/401 1 •14! ONW 101A•.1101 31 r 7A. Y7Ai '140 N143I 11140 443310 1V3AS 7 -4, 'N'IA? 331 r'7AV YOMw r'7At 3 117A1 011 -4, 14 . 741 4YY74 Se0 r'7A• vA0 11'3AV 107 01* art 11'1AV 11010 . 1 001 7N'7A! all 1r 1. N•S 11 AV WYI !MIA _ 'AV l UMW iuppIl 1 � j„J"L,LLJ..l:L1 ■ 11111111 11111113 OBI IOU 11ce u� 26144 ter" 1111 M 0 t! • •A• •A• 11 1111 N 1 �i •s 1111111! 1111[11] ttlt�7t 1111111' i••r /UI6, WV • ri71 Ittd jam ▪ VVVVVVV Ape Tap =111[0 _ imo t• ■ 1 -1 ti 4 • 1 suiiiiii� 11 • /•/ t N•1-N e •i iiii±!±E yl •111• nig 1 /111 •p 1• . 111 II! Vd 1 • 1 2 w 1 t • 1A 0 Yr 000 44 NS S340 PPP 11 seam m 111111 .1 161/1 �t • o iww .1 iii 41. 4. as !1 _ V ; MOSE 0 r MI t NO Air - 7 • 11 • tF • 0 • otfl 1 :011 • 1A•I N �.nr 11E MO 111111 1111.. 111\ 11111111 1111111 —C�ttu • V tAe { I • • -.• 14111 .y —,�'T u�'/1�" {,� � �j�l�l�.. (I ti0SY7w7 I � J} {� rl•tey �_�: _ X11 (_f }1 ■ - j 1 i..u•Ott. �.1y: iuiu �ii��i Mgt: %. • • OPP VW' 1NOw7 I _ I r; Y j�_ - •j ---- . . • 7•• 0014111 , • Ie ••• L.1 t 11_Lgr,.._L11� Y rt —� y;jjJ e _ A wpm 0. • a i • UMW UMW C W .J • • 0.. • •A• 1 _ �• JL' ,1 , 10 j0 V mzo -J 0 0 • JI et , Brouklyn .•.1k High Sch •I/C . --- L • , • to 0 L - WO Of N - * *City, all , * • -.4;7) •• • rater IP6 ' so • rY Ull MIN I A 3 17 rli ear ank UJ • Patorre 'ake cl In j 4 • IS G rde 1I 1 .; • 1 • I MIN If PALMER no ••• »t 84, L J DPI z ' LAKE PAR( WNW I ) Wm= 111011111W V, 35 .77p, PROJECT CORRIDOR • :94 1 11 0 ,1' a;) 711 li • • •• • • • • ..... — 1 0 ' • 15 e• • •I I I 1 ■t - I 2' ‘ e 'Part, y 41 1 1 Z•rsewt...1 • Wil S.) I ti rook ly 77 - rl • = 11.1. tele M 1__LOrthard Lane s ke-*\. r : Fair Oaks n - N. wy 4. •,-,---/, 1 63Try \ ,..,_ 1- ir.11- -1 :4 1 3 1 1 I _ I J! ' o ■-•( 1111 I . r , - , look • • LJ 11 630 a. • all I ! ed . > 1, __ . ;i i ‘,0 1 . ■ 746r r . s a:a 7 -- i r ! Ky j ..e...... A . • • • k Par BR 848 I • _ h BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA • L_ rin UN •IN cte, • irsai • ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS .PLANNERS • • • • MINNEAPOLIS NORTH, MINN. , .ss • S •; 11.4 • „... , 1,4 • 0 Altl•elIC Pl2rehn • v EXHIBIT 4.b.2 SCALE 1:24 000 1967 PHOTOREVISED 1972 AND 1980 DMA 7374 III SE—SERIES V872 2 5' — L_ -- § 20;_ Li \\.1 nnirlrip :;_grl;Ind ■ewl Pa4 JLJLJ • —.. • ) - . 1 , );',' ; ,,'. I' . • . • • ,, •1,-,, I 1 ''; ; i :.. i 1 'Zi. ' • 1 17 :•' • , ',.." r. -. 1 - 1 ------- " ---- -: -; .. `"- ' • 11. ;IP --' - ------ II. lirooktvrt Citti Hi :..-. ,, .-- Plc'. ;• .:::•0: I ••• -,.--_-_,,,,..., !,. I i! 'L. FILE NO DRS NO 1 itn I Ai ELSENS v _- CITY VIEW O N / CP INDIANA AVE rN 43 OEIENDRIER'S ..m 3IRDj_ ADD. HALIFAX AVE t1N x : ' a BOBENDRIER'S D Z _ " ;• 4TH. ADD. OBIMES AVE PALMER LAKE TERR.4TH ADD U 9 f F -3 9, AVE PA LMERL 4KE TERR 3RD ADD /c NOBLE AVE_ Cg OI/p a4 44, 14 40 LEE EWING AVE ONE ELSEN BEAFDlV CITY VIEW. y w L s MAJOR AVE - r tER'S • ADD. HALIFAX AVE BOBENDRIER'S — L r 'r 4TH. ADD. GMAES AVE - -T RIMER LAKE _ _ ERR. 4TH. ADD r ERR RD ADD • • • • • • • • • • • cc LL! 2 LAD'S BR KLYN ¢ g - m T • MAIM ' q. 0*01E0 ALA. ALTERNATE "C 0 E n«.e ..nr m.1 xw .1pn .. Po... e 1 -fl • -J cc J PuRCIVUIS 1 0 0 F W POSSIBLE PURCHASE PROPOSED MONO OF WAY W Cr Cr a la r• 3 CEMETERY - w g rn t w BROOKLYN CENTER 3 ' J— O soo ALTERNATE "C' ROW AVENUE N. • Exhibit 4.b.3(2) P4ONT OF WAY REQUIREMENTS ms No. 17136 MIS r �1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIi111111 111 a F 1111 1 1� 1 I .., ..ft .11. urn was c..wr a w • 1•••• w Matt Pr** end wi I r. wOr n••••■ N.• mr OP two • w ninname n �� SEtI 69th. AVE. N. BROOKLYN CENTER A • GRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED AUGNMENT • EXISTING CROSS SECTION Exhibit 4.b.3(3) I *Has I *Mt W1• DATE !RTE- H ♦R RO.W -c 69th. AVE. N. BROOKLYN CENTER • Exhibit 4.b.3(4) EXISTING CROSS SECTION GRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF ( VIZ PROPOSED AUGNMENT ..,E • • • • • • • • • ET MI IM 110 OEM DEDIOD 01.01 1C. N, • IT 8 Bz 69th. AVE. N. II. T M w c 1. w 9D FY lT7i.cR BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED ALIGNMENT • tx)■K S' Mt 1E0m r w A MI Exhibit 4.b.3(5) FUTURE CROSS SECTION 5 LANE ALTERNATE 'A' GRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF I 67 • • • J.. TIE ITEM M'p ■ PnW 1 , :s .. ..is.�.... w «.+a •r s. ... • - .r..: a al r uw.��.r. w. w. .0 •••• • A • • 69th. AVE. N. BROOKLYN CENTER • Exhibit FUTURE CROSS SECTION GRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED ALIGNMENT 4.b.3(6) 5 LANE ALTERNATE 'A' f MI ON). AT tH IMO APRIL M • • • I1EVrcYs ITEM • - -.___ DE.IYI C..ED Da. -_. =SEN •01.1111.••YC.r1KA••■• • • • 69th. AVE. N. BROOKLYN CENTER Exhibit 4.b.3(7) FUTURE CROSS SECTION 5 LANE ALTERNATE 4' GRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF 6?I NO Sel PROPOSED ALIGNMENT PAR APRIL Is • • ).o ap I,. aao a0 aoo Ib .b —0-a--n.— 'S., . p.r ww.a mm�+iwasu .Deft Aa 69th. AVE. N. BROOKLYN CENTER P(o.of[D iro rr WOK O•a• - tAmno NAL ( APRIL se T. f )o a o .o 1 wsn.• 00e14■01 Exhibit 4.b.3(8) FUTURE CROSS SECTION 5 LANE ALTERNATE b' GRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF I 571u PROPOSED ALIGNMENT 0011I .Y a • .Y MOM i 0.1 l 090 1 BROOKLYN CENTER,MNNESOTA SO 0 SO v00 .e/. I.r 88th AVENUE NORTH GEOMETRIC LAYOUT • • • Exhibit 4.b.3(9) i mess, lesslor mg :w .w...., woo ... nal 6EMSED Os. .y raYSIN..o..sn.wr.r • BROOKLYN CENTER.MNNESOTA I 89th AVENUE NORTH OEOLW€TNIC LAYOUT rr • Exhibit 4.b.3(10) • L SATE • • • • • • TEE„ 1 ± al kw. My Oltr•al ••••n •.. ••O i ... ••• A Ca 1 ROOKLYN CENTER,MINNESOTA nab 69th AVENUE NORTH GEOMETRIC LAYOUT N Exhibit 4.b.3( 1 1) 6 LANE ALTERNATE 'A ' •11th PAIN 5 . 1 1 1 1 01 0 8 > !A • • • IDATE MOM • • • • • • • p hproby bylby PON. 10■11 grab bribniree by ay sr/ soct al** Mill MOO 1 Om • duly nap... Prows. war to Iwo 044 • • gEIJ 41111111111, SVOINS••••■•COMPRIY•PUPOINNONS • BROOKLYN CENTF_R,MINNESOTA I 69th AVENUE NORTH GEOMETRIC LAYOUT • e xhibit t 4.b.3(13) 5 LANE ALTERNATE 'A' ma POOL 87131 • • • • • • • !► • • • • REY SMOKED I Molt, ..........._.... _. ........: - -- • • BROOKLYN CENTERMINNESOTA SO Exhibit 4.b.3(14) 6 LANE ALTERNATE 1' J O � 89th AVENUE NORTH I GEOMETRIC LAYOUT • ievro.1N �j Cm31.3, Ir. Rog BROOKLYN CENTERMNNESOTA • 69th AVENUE NORTH GEOMETRIC LAYOUT SO r • Exhibit 4.b.3(15) 5 LANE ALTERNATE R 8718 0811 • DATE MYMOIN . K, . .. , , . « . - /00.0110IM .raw pa ono of oo rtE. ono. c.EEc[u o.. ___. ..pw .� • lab • P ROOKLYN CENTER,MINNESOTA • • • 88th AVENUE NORTH GEOMETRIC LAYOUT Exhibit 4.b.3(16) 5 LAZE ALTERNATE 1r l_ Pla .n IT IK �+n 1 1 sr 15An Annum. 0015.1:0 4. plan was owere■ ,••• ••• ••• alrarci •••••■••. oso I •.• • 4W ••■••••••• ■••••••••■•■ ••■•••■• ••• Ow* 411111.1F 1■1111111■••00•MOII•••■••■•11• BROOKLYN CENTERMINNESOTA • • • 69th AVENUE NORTH OEOMETRIC LAYOUT • Exhibit 4.b.3( 18) 5 ANE ALTERNATE lr MS MO. 1111311 • .7 +DATE k 0 1 00 000 — - -- w . \ ` x + \ '�T 7+ 33-- — vim — 99 ..m. — -- o . '0 s 000 �M DE.S.1 BLDG 0 BLDG I M.. D,.110 00n .. . ,,.. ...V.1.7 a 010. 000r.040n 00: 1.1 1 0 04.000F00...r40001. use w Yew 010. t_0010 OM 0 • • • • • • • .o.0010•..n.l.cn•n.rr11 n WY nous. 0 0 nwY 1'J I BROOKLYN .CENTER.MWNESOTA rw 1E. 69th AVENUE NORTH GEOMETRIC LAYOUT _ . �x�i?c ; � � o , lob; Exhibit 4.b.3 (1 0) 3 TARE ALTERNATE . C . RS MD 1 1070 • -' I MO I I .r ;DATE 1 armor • 0 • a l ' 001 1 r.rry ....., .w r. P. wN,..Ir■ ti;•• w ... , o WO. .v.w w w.. ... u, wow.... Pr....... ..∎••• ..a c.Erwtn ow .__- .__- -- --__ -- w.P1 __ - -- m _ m, "4 r_ 1 - -- - -- I : � G — — • ! • (MnSL HOUSE BROOKLYN CENTER.MNNESOTA 'r' qt�F� 89th AVENUE NORTH GEOMETRIC LAYOUT SO Exhibit 4.b.3(20) 3 LANE ALTERNATE "C" I 0713111 I OATS /. REM 1 he., *n/,.1 M On 1.41 o, +,r ft asK. •••41,a• N Yr„ r • 4 444 4 0 .M.wN wMwW�I N/iw .,YtiMnN SEN mmamosmomsrnmommom ROOKLYN CENTER,MINNESOTA Beth AVENUE NORTH GEOMETRIC LAYOUT • Exhibit 4.b.3 (21) al 000 .O.. _ w ,. .=.S 'BROOKLYN CENTER,MINNESOTA .. 0 89th AVENUE NORTH GEOMETRIC LAYOUT •M Exhibit 4.b.3 (22) • • • • • PC � .1 SPATE • s-, p :.0.“6 PE..w CDEPEO 0.1. 11.p , lea 0 BROOKLYN CENTER,MINNESOTA 69th AVENUE NORTH GEOMETRIC LAYOUT • • • Exhibit 4.b.3 (23) 3 AP* ALTERNATE a I/. 111/0111/1 M. AKKINO CEO. iun II i =iiiii OVI UM W& 9,500 84.401. SCHOOL :I ... . ..... • • • — L '1 1 1 1 ; 1 11 t x 11 1 •'•''•'•��� }. min : ' x.••.,,.4 • CE N �� 2 i„I i�1- _ _ a• RE m ; /1/11111 ••f = - = = =s 111W. ° L I N M I f ITE ZE - D. ,- 7171 I.NE L41 11 11 11it 1 ,NCNESIEA L• e * 1 E IWIIICMES7E•l 1 1 R. ` I �i 11I1+IUI 1+ I REI wij wIC1rFRn1[t1mFRm ZON /NG D /STR /CTS All 01STR1CT EOIMOARIE* 147[1* PERPENWCIAAALY TOTNE CMRERUMi OF STREETS ALL AREA* NOT OTNEAMUE 01 *IANATEO Alt AI BESIOENCE RI - ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE R2- TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE RS- MULTIPLE FAMILY E an t E RA- /RUMPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ti vs we MEAEI RS- MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 1 *N10* M*RTI 01- MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE t• AN * 11104T1 R7 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE • 1TMIa• M M IMI OE NOTES FLOOOWAY I100YR1 DENOTES FL000 FRINGE 000 Y10 .... — t211TICAL RIVERS AREA BOUNDARY COMAERCE Ct- SERVICE/OFFICE CIA- SERVICE /OFFICE C2- COMMERCE (VOUSFRY 11- INDUSTRIAL PARK 12 GENERAL INDUSTRY Tfl PEN SPACE 01- FUSLIC OPEN SPACE RESERVED OE- PUBUC B PRNATE OPEN SPACE RESERVEO '_ t — 1114 ill 11trIO1II11 PALMER LAKE • ASO cur-meows • ARCN/EAcr, • I1.•NMII• • � I r BROOKLYN CENTER,MINNESOTA .." " FIDE is ZONING EXHIBIT 4.b.4 ORG Na • • • • • Vv- BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA is J Op Irc Sfl • ggcfrncrs•I( • i ) j /r LL. ( i s SOILS CLASSIFICATION EXHIBIT 15 ALE NO ORG NO. • • e al AUN1 Eft. D�J ANNERio al " •�I 461 11 ir a% MIA. OUTUICIIIIEI - - - -.1 IN Ma IS d r- i /-� w II .v,(( L - t 1 - 1iNCNE STE ��l NE ri }�I } }I 1111 }1)� 1}}}{} . II 1� U1�, !J. Ii ton: WOO Al I = ■ 2N0 AVE 111 LANE R 3 e NO CZ w RI 'Inmin 1 i � 6 1 6a N 1 1 1 1 1 C 1 _ 11J 1 LI ll1.111l IIII1 ■ LI 11111 11111 1IE>y'1111 R5 ma en re 1115 N 9 :g 15 1 • 69TH' 1 :V Ei 671 R3 N • o 0 e - s OVC( .+[• iv j I �,11 1 6'm111 MO MO - 1 � " �tI1�l 1 �j r en 111 la TA C2 414.1401 WEI VIM 5 11 • 6)60 aa F"~ math, , Ititli 1111 NEMO" 1 1 6R1 1 :PALMER -:LAKE PARK 4. U 11U I U � I 11 1 1... . IRCv' 5 .1111M70 = 112 1 . �• 41i UM W wwi[NM •[ "";7;"h R t 4 i 1 / CRCE• _ OPEN SPACE Su 2 67 EREEw• R. BLVD C2 •VE C,2 R 5 beam 11 dB US 67 : ................... Ii L 2 , SAFETY .,.:; \ ZONE i � \ A . 11 I • • *4i. 1 lA1 1 I'f + °lsc l `' I N T"w°o° P "C i Temc TITILANE BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA T 00 0 9 , I� / 1 vtE ■11► 'I\ =rt 6T 4 L� U U CO BOO 11 E M 6 al 111111 /�' —�1 6Film ; M {Qj.�J {(�j�1 ENGINEERS • ARCMIEKES • PL ANNERS .- T 1 LABS L•NE 69111 R5 I 41 EXHIBIT 23 RECEPTOR SITES 69TH AVE. CORRIDOR STUDY AREA 111 U1 = ON ON d FILE NO AVE DRG. NO. • ••_ 1997 • U' J • 4 . 5 4.5 4.4 EXISTING 2.26 2.26 2.21 4.3 4.3 1997 t 2.16 2.16 2007 1997 2007 2007 2.10 TABLE 1 PREDICTED CONCENTRATION OF CO (IN PPM) 2.16 c) 2.16 4.3 2.16 2.16 4.4 4.3 2.21 2.16 4.2 2.10 2.1 4.3 4.3 4.2 2.10 4.2 2.10 Note: Receptor locations are shown in Exhibit 23 to AMBIENT CONC. (1 HOUR) =4.0 PPM AMBIENT CONC. (8 HOUR) =2.0 PPM 2.10 to 4.2 4.6 2.32 2.16 4.2 2.10 2.10 2.10 ti 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.2 2.10 4.2 0 4.3 2.16 Exhibit 23a • • •• s • L •10 L 50 EXISTING 1997 2007 1997 . m J • 2007 1997 t v • . • Q 2007 64.5 65.2 68.5 62.4 62.5 TABLE 2 NOISE ANALYSIS SUMMARY N 67.1 66.5 68.2 65.6 65.9 L = 65 dBA 56.8 62.4 67.2 64.9 64.2 62.4 67.5 64.3 60.9 65.2 47.8 48.2 59.8 62.8 61.1 49.8 60.8 49.5 48.8 48.7 49.2 c0 60.4 60.2 60.8 Note: Receptor locations for noise analysis are the same as those used for air quality analysis. • STANDARDS PM PEAK HOUR NOISE VALUES ti 63.0 61.8 63.5 62.1 64.0 62.8 L = 60 dBA. Exhibit 23c • • • • • • 10014,4•110 1 - P.44 Sicluv eon JJ P491 110LWARY StrilaV 00(31 0 04••• • 400000 PROPOSED ...60 • it e 00.46 RIGT 4 100••• 44•14 < PROPOSED RIGHI-t.4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA ROY UVARY SECr10$ 6ff)(3) • • 1: . a v581 INCIONHISSAMORIWCIS•PlANIMPS • • • • PARR 119060.477r Stralail 6(F.N 1 - - - - - -1 - - • I / $1 tam nun um 41.1 SECTION 6(f)(3) EXHIBIT 27.a PALMS L.11f1 PAM I INVIIMS1 PROPOSED 697N A1f 457■144171( CIE07 Noma RiCoor .4cOUISITION CI Fr OF MOM rtv CO PROJELY 1919 AUGUST 24 1999 /*KM 41•14 iffIrmsemov$,-. FILE NO. ONO. NO • • • BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA ENGINEERS • •NCNIIICTS • EN ANNE NS • • 0 0 0 p- 1 ` . 69TH AVE.i 8 1- z a. 0 c Q EXISTING (1987) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) EXHIBIT 28.1a P11E MC. ONG NQ • BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA •NGMYRRf • ARCNIIRCIS • IL MINERS 1997 FORECASTED ADT EXHIBIT 28.1b RILE 16 ono Na • BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 4 s FNLMIIERS • IRCNII &CIS • PI INNERS 1 • 1-694 1 1 111 7,200 I /� ) ` " 41 r 17,200 _ � I, + ( lo,9o0 \.( I (::•4,-11) A AVE. I I 1 2007 FORECASTED ADT LAMIT 2#.1c Rl NO p11 N O • o I40 -� 430 I 0--•. o 10 I +� ° tu W 4 UU Q ' 11. 0 210 k_ l° -i3 l -95 S..' ' .r -165 o I x-455 to _ lei f ......_515 '�-- M 240 0 ' 50 \ r-155 r » L1 r 1 t r ‘ r-60 ,-- 65 J _6 LI "9TH 1 15 -A ` r 30-'0 1 -� , } (30� 1\ f (755 -4.. "\ (4 0--"I AVE. 210 —+� d * o, 13 .4 550 - ∎ in 410 - + a 1460 -• 1 0 0 345 , 215 - "" 160 34 IO�i of 15 o�10 -� o ' BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA =S I I tNGNM&RS • *RCNIT&< YS 1 01 AS . RS 1 -694 1- Z 0 C o 4. to -55 o 0 15 -115 N o -� - 2 2 r80 .0 ) r^-10 45-A, r 30- r 95 0 4 O 105 lV 20Th EX EXISTING (1987) PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS T 28.21 ALE ND DRG Nn • • • 0 Tr.; 310 250 "-165 125 290 —+ 200 lb O, I 15 11 1175 370 BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 330-' 1 R I 180 I� AO —+ 540 - - +� '? 240—A INCOME.. ERCNIIEC IS. PI N•NERS • 470- e 13 I -694 1- z 0 a. 0 2 a 60 o N 15 - 12 5 N o -� 2 40 j to ..'� m' w x--550 I-. �- - 265 t 70 /. LI `_ 69TH J L r. -so L (S0--.. ( J AVE. 60-01 f r 35 105 oho 145-+ Vin{ CM o O M 115 1997 FORECASTED PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 20 EXHIBIT 28.2b i FILE M5. ORG. NO. • • • • • 1190 370 BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA • • W Q 330) 0 • v 1 ` I ` e 350 L. 180 (� ��0 � 'J F_2 l 1 - J o e l' R -•-655 I - _ r , r 165 r 1 r.✓ 1 ` r ‘1/4 �- '" f (a' \ o \.( Vii' f . 195-f t r-- ( -85 - r A P o SS` G I _ 15 323 —290 N so Li -- 69TH J r _A AVE. 1 -694 2007 FORECASTED PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 1— Z 0 0 • o n N 140 IQ o -+ — 265 r - 95 t l 65 h YO 120 —..- 0 1 � t 135 N N 25 � Q EXHIBIT 28.20 FILE O. 0116 N Q CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 10/23/89 Agenda Item Number (5 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION • *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: RECOMMENDATION RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF SHADE TREES ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: 1/1j SY K DIRECTOR'OF PUBL WORK y * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ********* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached NO • The attached resolution represents the official council action required to expedite removal of the trees most recently marked by the city tree inspector in accordance with the procedures outlined therein. It is anticipated that this resolution will be submitted for council consideration each meeting during the summer and fall as new trees are marked. It is recommended the council adopt the attached resolution. • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: ATTEST: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF SHADE TREES (ORDER NO. DST 10/23/89) WHEREAS, a Notice to Abate Nuisance and Shade Tree Removal Agreement has been issued to the owners of certain properties in the City of Brooklyn Center giving the owners twenty (20) days to remove shade trees on the owners' property; and WHEREAS, the City can expedite the removal of these shade trees by declaring them a public nuisance: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The shade trees at the following addresses are hereby declared to be a public nuisance. PROPERTY OWNER Clerk PROPERTY ADDRESS TREE NUMBER CITY OF BROOKLYN CTR GARDEN CITY PRK 576 CITY OF BC CABLE PARK 577 CITY OF BC CABLE PARK 578 CABLE PARK 579 2. After twenty (20) days from the date of the notice, the property owners will receive a second written notice that will give them (5) business days in which to contest the determination of City Council by requesting a hearing in writing. Said request shall be filed with the City Clerk. 3. After five (5) days, if the property owner fails to request a hearing, the tree(s) shall be removed by the City. 4. All removal costs, including legal, financing and administrative charges, shall be specially assessed against the property. Date Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: TELEPHONE SYSTEM RECOMMENDATION *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. Aa VAL: EDA Coordinator S• ature - title * * * * * * ** � ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *° * * * *?,* * *. * * *r` ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** '' age ;ma CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 10/23/89 Agenda Item Number 7%x`4- ' ' REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) Monday evening we will be recommending to the Council /EDA that the bid of Norstan, Inc. in the amount of $121,658.53 be accepted as the best (lowest) responsible bid. We will also recommend that the bid of Telecom North in the amount of $15,014.00 be accepted for the cabling contract. Norstan, Inc. is being recommended over U.S. West and its bid of $247,849.35 as a one -time payment for seven (7) years. if you present value the two (2) systems along with operation costs, Norstan with voice mail would cost $274,513 and U.S. West Centron system would cost $309,376. However, if voice mail is eliminated, Norstan costs $252,421 and U.S. West would be $235,836 over seven (7) years. Low bid is determined by the presence or absence of voice mail. One of the uses of voice mail will be to answer the phone at the switchboard after a selected number of rings to inform the caller that all lines are tied up and that the operator will be with them as soon as possible. Also, voice mail is used to leave verbal messages with individuals at City Hall. That individual can call in and get their messages without being in the building. These are applications for this system in the police and planning and inspections department. Also, our consultant's position is that as we become more acquainted with the system, we will find more uses. They have indicated that voice mail is a fast - growing trend within the industry and, we will have it in the near future if we elect not to have it now. We believe it is a good buy now under this system. We will be available Monday along with the consultant to answer questions. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BID OF NORSTAN, INC. TO PROVIDE A TELEPHONE SYSTEM FOR THE CITY HALL /CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX AND THE EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center's present phone system is a continued maintenance problem; and WHEREAS, the City requested bids for a new system for the City Hall /Civic Center complex and the Earle Brown Heritage Center; and WHEREAS, the City has received bids as follows: Company Bid Norstan, Inc. $113,905.02 Telecom North 142,369.00 U.S. West 249,441.19 WHEREAS, Norstan, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder when bids were present valued over a seven -year period. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the bid of Norstan, Inc. in the amount of $113,905.02 be accepted and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement with Norstan, Inc. ATTEST: Date Mayor Clerk RESOLUTION NO. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. )77- Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BID OF TELECOM NORTH FOR CABLING FOR A PHONE SYSTEM FOR THE CITY HALL /CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX AND THE EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is replacing the present phone system in the City Hall and adding a new system to the Earle Brown Heritage Center; and follows: WHEREAS, the City received bids for the cable system as Company Bid Telecom North $15,014.00 P & T Communication Professionals 21,297.76 U.S. West 30,948.64 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the bid of Telecom North in the amount of $15,014.00 be accepted and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement with Telecom North. ATTEST: Date Mayor Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. s • • *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: REFUND /REFINANCING BOND ISSUE *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. AP' OVAL: EDA Coordinator Si ature - title ,or 4 2 **********.********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *,t * *** x; t *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: ' ";, ` CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 10/23/89 Agenda Item Number gF) REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Ryan Construction has a request before the Council to approve a refunding of the IRB issue on their second office building. In essence, it is a refinancing of that building. The documents have been reviewed by the City Attorney's office and have been found to be in proper order. The bond issue is at a point in time where they can be called and reissued at a lower rate. I would recommend approval of the resolution. I will be available Monday to answer questions about this request should there be any. • • • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO A $8,100,000 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE NOTE (BROOKDALE TWO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PROJECT); AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 469.152- 469.1651 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. Definitions. 1.01. In this Resolution the following terms have the following respective meanings unless the context hereof or use here in clearly requires otherwise: Act: the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152- 469.1651, as amended; Assignment: the Assignment of Leases and Rents to be given by the Partnership to the Lender; City: the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, its successors and assigns; Guaranty: the Guaranty Agreement to be given by Northwestern National Life Insurance Company to the Lender; Holder: the Lender or any person to whom the Note has been assigned pursuant to Section 4.04 of this Resolution; Improvements: the approximately 116,000 square foot office building and related facilities and improvements located on the Land; Land: the real estate located in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and legally described in Exhibit A to the Mortgage; Lender: General Electric Capital Corporation, a Delaware corporation, its successors and assigns; Loan Agreement: the Loan Agreement to be entered into between the City and the Partnership; • that: RESOLUTION NO. Mortgage: the Combination Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement to be entered into between the Partnership, as mortgagor, and the Lender, as mortgagee; Note: the $8,100,000 Commercial Development Refunding Revenue Note (Brookdale Two Limited Partnership Project) to be issued by the City pursuant to this Resolution; Partnership: Brookdale Two Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership and its permitted successors and assigns under the Loan Agreement; Pledge Agreement: the Pledge Agreement to be given by the City to the Lender; Project: the Improvements and the Land; Refunded Bonds: the City's Commercial Development Revenue Bonds (Brookdale Two Limited Partnership Project), Series 1984, dated December 1, 1984, outstanding in the principal amount of $8,100,000; Remarketing Agreement: the Remarketing Agreement to be entered into between the City, the Partnership, the Guarantor and Juran & Moody, Inc., as Remarketing Agent; and Resolution: this resolution of the City. Section 2. Findings. It is hereby found and declared (a) the Project has contributed to the tax base of the City, has been of direct benefit to the taxpayers of the City as well as those of the County of Hennepin and the school district in which the Project is located and refinancing of the Project will enhance the economic viability of the Project; (b) the Project has heretofore been approved by the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development as furthering the purposes of the Act after a public hearing as required by the Act and Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended; (c) the refinancing of the Project, the issuance and sale of the Note, the execution and delivery of the Loan Agreement, the Remarketing Agreement and the Pledge Agreement, and the performance of all covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Note, the Loan • • RESOLUTION NO. Agreement, the Remarketing Agreement and the Pledge Agreement and of all other acts and things required under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Note, the Loan Agreement, the Remarketing Agreement and the Pledge Agreement valid and binding obligations of the City in accordance with their terms, are authorized by the Act; (d) it is desirable that the Note in the amount of $8,100,000 be issued by the City upon the terms set forth herein, and that the City pledge its interest in the Loan Agreement and grant a security interest therein to the Lender pursuant to the Pledge Agreement as security for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Note, and the City has not heretofore pledged, assigned or otherwise encumbered its interest in the Loan Agreement; and (e) the loan payments contained in the Loan Agreement are fixed, and required to be revised from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenue sufficient to provide for prompt paymen~ of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Note when due, and the Loan Agreement also provides that the Partnership is required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the Project, including, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and all taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the Project and payable during the term of the Loan Agreement. Section 3. Approval of Agreements; Execution. 3.01. Approval of Documents. Pursuant to the foregoing, there have been prepared and presented to the Council copies of the following documents, all of which are now, or shall be, placed on file in the office of the City Clerk: (a) Assignment; (b) Loan Agreement; (c) Mortgage; (d) Guaranty; (e) Pledge Agreement; and (f) Remarketing Agreement. RESOLUTION NO. The forms of the documents listed in (a) through (f) above are hereby approved, with such variations, insertions and additions as are deemed appropriate by the parties and approved by the City Attorney. 3.02. Execution. Upon the completion of the Loan Agreement, the Pledge Agreement and the Remarketing Agreement approved in Section 3.01 hereof, the Mayor and the City Manager shall execute the same on behalf of the City, shall execute the Note in substantially the form approved in Section 4.01 hereof on behalf of the City, and shall execute such other certifications, documents or instruments as bond counsel or counsel for the Lender shall require, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and all certifications, recitals and representations therein shall constitute the certifications, recitals and representations of the City. Execution of any instrument or document by one or more appropriate officers of the City shall constitute, and shall be deemed the conclusive evidence of, the approval and authorization by the City and the Council of the instrument or document so executed. Section 4. The Note. 4.01. Form and Authorized Amount. The Note shall be issued substantially in the form presented to the Council and set forth as Exhibit A to this Resolution with such appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as are permitted or required by this Resolution, in the total principal amount of $8,100,000. The terms of the Note are set forth therein, and such terms, including but not limited to provisions as to interest rate, dates and amount of payment of principal and interest and prepayment privileges, are incorporated by reference herein. It is acknowledged that the interest rate is not completed in the Note set forth as Exhibit A to this Resolution. The City Manager is hereby authorized to approve the initial rate, provided that such rate does not exceed 8.25% per annum. The approval of the City Manager shall be conclusively presumed by the execution of the Note by the officers of the City. 4.02. Execution. The Note shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and shall be sealed with its corporate seal. In case any officer whose signature shall appear on the Note shall cease to be such officer before the delivery thereof, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes. • • RESOLUTION NO. 4.03. Mutilated, Lost and Destroyed Note. In case the Note shall become mutilated or be destroyed or lost, the City shall cause to be executed and delivered a new Note of like outstanding principal amount and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of the mutilated Note, or in lieu of and in substitution for such Note destroyed or lost, upon payment by the Holder of the expenses and charges of the City in connection therewith, and, in case the Note is destroyed or lost, filing by the Holder with the City evidence satisfactory to it of such loss or destruction. 4.04. Assignment. The Note may be assigned by the Holder, from time to time, by endorsement thereon or by separate written instrument; provided that notice of any such assignment shall be given in writing to the City and the Partnership. At the request of the Holder, the Note shall be registered on the books of the City, subject to the conditions set forth in the form of the Note attached hereto as Exhibit A. 4.05. Redemption of Refunded Bonds. The Refunded Bonds shall be redeemed on December 1, 1989 from the proceeds of the Note and the trustee for the Refunded Bonds is authorized to give notice of redemption of the Refunded Bonds in accordance with their terms. Section 5. Limitations of the City's Obligations. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Note, the Loan Agreement or the Pledge Agreement or any other documents referred to in Section 3.01 hereof, the Note shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation, and shall not be payable from nor charged upon any funds other than the revenue pledged to the payment thereof, and the City shall not be subject to any liability thereon, and no Holder of the Note shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Note or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City other than those rights and interests of the City under the Loan Agreement which have been pledged to the Lender by the Pledge Agreement, and the Note shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City other than those rights and interests of the City under the Loan Agreement which have been pledged to the Lender by the Pledge Agreement. The agreement of the City to perform the covenants and other provisions contained in this Resolution or the Note, the Loan Agreement or the Pledge Agreement and the other documents listed in Section 3.01 hereof shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues furnished by the Partnership sufficient to pay all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof, and the City shall not be subject to any personal or pecuniary liability thereon other than as stated above. • • RESOLUTION NO. ATTEST: Date Mayor Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 9th day of October , 19 89 , at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment to Chapter 11 of the city ordinances. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please notify the personnel coordinator at 561 -5440 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER ORDINANCES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 11 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Delete the line: [(For the purposes of this ordinance, people born on or before 9/1/67 are considered 21 years of age.)] as it appears in the following sections: Section 11 -107, subd 1; Section 11 -109, subd 3; Section 11 -112, subds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8; Section 11 -204, subd 3; Section 11 -508, subd 1; Section 11- 510, subd 7; Section 11 -512, subds 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6; Section 11 -609, subd 1; Section 11 -611, subd 7; Section 11 -613, subds 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; Section 11 -709, subd 1; Section 11 -711, subd 7; and Section 11 -713, subds 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Section 11 -511.. HOURS OF OPERATION. 2. Organizations who hold "on -sale club" licenses may obtain a special license to serve intoxicating liquor between the hours of 10 a.m. [and 12 midnight] on Sundays and 1 a.m. on Mondays in conjunction with the serving of food. They must show proof to the chief of police that food will be sold and that a minimum of 30 persons may be served at any one time. • • oio ORDINANCE NO. Section 11 -612. HOURS OF OPERATION. No intoxicating liquor shall be sold nor consumed nor permitted to be consumed within the licensed premises after 1 a.m. on Sunday nor until 8 a.m. on Monday. No intoxicating liquor shall be sold nor consumed nor permitted to be consumed within a licensed premise between the hours of 1 a.m. and 8 a.m. on any weekday. No "on- sale" shall be made after 8 p.m. on December 24. On Sundays, wine may be sold without a special license under the authority of an "on -sale wine" license between the hours of 10 a.m. Sunday and [12 midnight] 1 a.m. Monday in conjunction with the serving of food. Section 11 -701. DEFINITION OF 'PERMS. 10. The term "restaurant" means any establishment under the control of a single proprietor or manager, having appropriate facilities to serve meals and for seating not less than 150 guests at one time, and where in consideration of payment therefor, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public, and which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests, and a significant part of the business of which is the serving of foods for consumption on the premises. 11. The term "premises" as used in this ordinance, shall mean the inside of the building or the leased space inside a building as shown on the plan submitted to the chief of police with the original license. Outside areas, such as patios or parking lots, shall not be included unless specifically listed on the license or special permission in writing is obtained pursuant to Section 11 -702. paragraph 3h for a limited period of time under certain conditions. Section 11 -702. LICENSE REQUIRED. 2. "On -sale liquor" licenses shall be issued only to restaurants which are conducted in such a manner that a significant part of the revenue for a license year is the sale of foods for consumption on the premises, and to hotels conducted in such a manner that, of that part of the total revenue derived from the serving of goods and intoxicating liquors, a significant part thereof for the license year is derived from the serving of foods for consumption on the premises. The term "significant part" is defined under each license class. • • • ORDINANCE NO. 3. The following are the types of "on -sale liquor" licenses which can be issued under this section. a. On -Sale Class A Liquor Licenses: 80 percent or more of the applicable revenue derived from the serving of foods for consumption on the premises; Class A licenses are available to all hotels and restaurants. b. On -Sale Class B Liquor Licenses: 50 percent through 79 percent of the applicable revenue derived from the serving of foods for consumption on the premises; Class B licenses are available to all hotels and restaurants. c. On -Sale Class C Liquor licenses: 40 percent through 49 percent of the applicable revenue derived from the serving of foods for consumption on the premises; Class C licenses are available only to hotels and to restaurants which derive a considerable part of their revenue from sources other than liquor and food. h. Special Provision: expansion of premises for special events: Special permission may be granted either by the City Council or in writing signed by both the chief of police and the director of planning and inspection for a temporary, expansion of the licensed premises for wedding receptions, parties. promotional activities or other special events. Special permits may be issued only for specified areas of the same lot, piece or parcel of land on which the premises lies or a contiguous lot, piece or Darcel of land. Application shall be made to the chief of police on a form provided by the City and all information requested by the chief of police shall be submitted therewith. Permits may be granted for a period of no more than ten days. and permits may not be granted . for a total of more than forty days in any one license year. , In acting on an application. consideration shall be given to such factors as noise. nature of entertainment to be provided. potential difficulties with law enforcement or security. proximity of residential or other sensitive land uses. effect on parking or other zoning or land use controls. and the nature . of the event proposed. The permit may specify conditions with which the licensee must comply, and the sale of liquor ORDINANCE NO. pursuant to the permit shall be deemed a consent and agreement to the imposition of such conditions. Violations of any such conditions or any other provisions of law are grounds for suspension or revocation of the permit and of the licensee's liquor license. Permits issued pursuant to this paragraph may be suspended without prior notice by the chief of police upon determination that such suspension is necessary or expedient to protect the public health. safety or welfare. Section 11 -705. RENEWAL APPLICATIONS. Applications for renewal of an existing license shall be made at least 60 days prior to the date of expiration of the license. If, in the judgment of the city council, good and sufficient cause is shown by an applicant for his failure to file for a renewal within the time provided, the city council may, if the other provisions of this ordinance are complied with, grant the application. At the earliest practicable time after application is made for a renewal of an "on -sale liquor" license, and in any event prior to the time that the application is considered by the city council, the applicant shall file with the chief of police a statement prepared by a certified public accountant that shows the total gross sales, the total food sales for consumption on the premises, and the total food sales of the restaurant for the twelve month period immediately preceding the date for filing renewal applications. A foreign corporation shall file a current Certificate of Authority. Section 11 -711. CONDITIONS OF LICENSE. 16. A licensed restaurant shall be conducted in such a manner that a significant part of the business for a license year is the serving of foods for consumption on the premises. Section 11 -718. PROHTBI'1'ED ACTIVITIES.. Subdivision 1. Prohibition It is unlawful for anv licensee. owner or manager of any establishment licensed under Sections 11 -701 through 11 -718 of this Code to cause commit_ permit or allow in the licensed premises any of the activities listed in this Section or any similar activities or to sell liquor in any premises from which any such activities may be viewed or heard.. Subdivision 2. Prohibited Activities. Activities referred to in Subdivision 1 of this Section include the following: ORDINANCE NO. A'1'1'EST: a. Nudity. sadomasochistic abuse or sexual conduct as those terms are defined in Section 19 -1700 of this Code, either actual or simulated. b. Mud wrestling. wet T -shirt contests, lingerie shows or displays. or strip -tease dancing._ e. The display of any of the foregoing by any means including. but not. limited to. hooks, printed material,. magazines, movies, pictures, videos_ plays, exhibitions_ recordings closed circuit television.. productions, or any other device or contrivance in any way which is capable of being used or adapted to arouse interest. or to affect the human senses, whether through the medium of reading, observation, sound or any other means.. Subdivision 3. Penalty, Violation of this Section is grounds for, revocation of any license issued under Sections 11 -701 through 11 -718 of this. Code. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and • upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of Clerk Mayor Date of Publication Effective Date (Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.) CITY OF BROOKLYN CEN'I'ER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 23rd day of October , 19 89 , at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment to Chapter 11 of the city ordinances. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please notify the personnel coordinator at 561 -5440 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER ORDINANCES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 11 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Delete the line: [(For the purposes of this ordinance, people born on or before 9/1/67 are considered 21 years of age.)] as it appears in the following sections: Section 11 -107, subd 1; Section 11 -109, subd 3; Section 11 -112, subds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8; Section 11 -204, subd 3; Section 11 -508, subd 1; Section 11- 510, subd 7; Section 11 -512, subds 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6; Section 11 -609, subd 1; Section 11 -611, subd 7; Section 11 -613, subds 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; Section 11 -709, subd 1; Section 11 -711, subd 7; and Section 11 -713, subds 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Section 11 -511.. HOURS OF OPERATION. 2. Organizations who hold "on -sale club" licenses may obtain a special license to serve intoxicating liquor between the hours of 10 a.m. [and 12 midnight] on Sundays and 1 a.m. on Mondays in conjunction with the serving of food. They must show proof to the chief of police that food will be sold and that a minimum of 30 persons may be served at any one time. ORDINANCE NO. Section 11-612. HOURS OF OPERATION. No intoxicating liquor shall be sold nor consumed nor permitted to be consumed within the licensed premises after 1 a.m. on Sunday nor until 8 a.m. on Monday. No intoxicating liquor shall be sold nor consumed nor permitted to be consumed within a licensed premise between the hours of 1 a.m. and 8 a.m. on any weekday. No "on- sale" shall be made after 8 p.m. on December 24. On Sundays, wine may be sold without a special license under the authority of an "on -sale wine" license between the hours of 10 a.m. Sunday and [12 midnight] 1 a.m. Monday in conjunction with the serving of food. Section 11 -701.. DEFINITION OF 'PERMS. 9. The term "hotel" means and includes any establishment having a resident proprietor or manager where, in consideration of payment therefor, food and lodging are regularly furnished to transients, which maintains for the use of its guests not less than 100 guest rooms with bedding and other usual, suitable, and necessary furnishings in each room, which is provided at the main entrance with a suitable lobby, desk, and office for the registration of its guests on the ground floor, which employs an adequate staff to provide suitable and usual service, and which maintains under the same management and control as the rest of the establishment and has, as an integral part thereof, a dining room with appropriate facilities for seating not less than 100 guests at one time, where the general public are, in consideration of payment therefor, served with meals at tables. In the case of an on -sale Class E license. the hotel shall have a dining room with appropriate facilities for seating not less than 30 guests at one time where guests are provided with, food and beverages.. 10. The term "restaurant" means any establishment under the control of a single proprietor or manager, having appropriate facilities to serve meals and for seating not less than 150 guests at one time, and where in consideration of payment therefor, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public, and which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests, and a significant part of the business of which is the serving of foods for consumption on the premises. ORDINANCE NO. 11. The term "premises" as used in this ordinance, shall mean the inside of the building or the leased space inside a building as shown on the plan submitted to the chief of police with the original license. Outside areas, such as patios or parking lots, shall not be included unless specifically listed on the license or special permission in writing is obtained pursuant to Section 11 -702. paragraph 3h for a limited period of time under certain conditions. Section 11 -702. LICENSE REQUIRED. 2. "On -sale liquor" licenses shall be issued only to restaurants which are conducted in such a manner that a significant part of the revenue for a license year is the sale of foods for consumption on the premises. and to hotels conducted in such a manner that, of that part of the total revenue derived from the serving of goods and intoxicating liquors, a significant part thereof for the license year is derived from the serving of foods for consumption on the premises. The term "significant part" is defined under each license class. The following are the types of "on -sale liquor" licenses which can be issued under this section. a. On -Sale Class A Liquor Licenses: 80 percent or more of the applicable revenue derived from the serving of foods for consumption on the premises; Class A licenses are available to all hotels and restaurants. b. On -Sale Class B Liquor Licenses: 50 percent through 79 percent of the applicable revenue derived from the serving of foods for consumption on the premises; Class B licenses are available to all hotels and restaurants. c. On -Sale Class C Liquor licenses: 40 percent through 49 percent of the applicable revenue derived from the serving of foods for consumption on the premises; Class C licenses are available only to hotels and to restaurants which derive a considerable part of their revenue from sources other than liquor and food. • • ORDINANCE NO. d. On -Sale Class E Liquor License: this license is available only, to hotels which serve food and liquor in a dining room to guests. Applicants for Class E licenses must submit with their applications menus of food and nonalcoholic beverages which will be served with the liquor dispensed. The City Council will determine whether such food and beverages are adequate to protect the public interests. Changes in menu may not be, made without the prior approval of the Chief of Police.. Liquor may be dispensed for no more than two hours a day and shall not he dispensed before 4:00 p.m. or after 8:00 p.m. The licensee may not require the payment of consideration for liquor other than that which is paid as its regular charges for rooms. The area designated as the dining room shall be adequately separated from other common areas of the hotel by physical barriers to control ingress and egress and to ensure security and compliance with the provisions of this Code. Class E licensees may serve liquor on Sunday subject to the provisions of this Code without a separate Sunday Liquor License. Special Provision: expansion of premises for special events: Special permission may be granted either by the City Council or in writing signed by both the chief of police and the director of planning and inspection for a temporary expansion of the licensed premises for wedding receptions, parties. promotional activities or other special events. Sp ecial permits may be issued only for specified areas of the same lot. piece or parcel of land on which the premises lies or a contiguous lot. piece or parcel of land. Application shall be made to the chief of police on a form provided by the City and all information requested by the chief of police shall be submitted therewith. Permits may be granted for a period of no more than ten days. and permits may not be granted for a total of more than forty days in any one license year. In acting on an application. consideration shall be given to such factors as noise, nature of entertainment to be provided. potential difficulties with law enforcement or security. proximity of residential or other sensitive land uses. effect on parking or other zoning or land use controls, and the nature of the event proposed. The permit may specify conditions with which the licensee must comply, and the sale of liquor pursuant to the permit shall be deemed a consent and • • ORDINANCE NO. agreement to the imposition of such conditions. Violations . of any such conditions or any other provisions of law are, grounds for suspension or revocation of the permit and of the, licensee's liquor license. Permits issued pursuant to this paragraph may he suspended without prior notice by the chief of police upon determination that such suspension is necessary or expedient to protect the public health. safety or welfare. Section 11 -705. RENEWAL APPLICATIONS. Applications for renewal of an existing license shall be made at least 60 days prior to the date of expiration of the license. If, in the judgment of the city council, good and sufficient cause is shown by an applicant for his failure to file for a renewal within the time provided, the city council may, if the other provisions of this ordinance are complied with, grant the application. At the earliest practicable time after application is made for a renewal of an "on -sale liquor" license, and in any event prior to the time that the application is considered by the city council, the applicant shall file with the chief of police a statement prepared by a certified public accountant that shows the total gross sales, the total food sales for consumption on the premises. and the total food sales of the restaurant for the twelve month period immediately preceding the date for filing renewal applications. A foreign corporation shall file a current Certificate of Authority. Section 11 -710. PLACES INELIGIBLE FOR LICENSE. 3. No "on -sale liquor" license shall be granted for a restaurant that does not have a dining room, open to the general public, with a total minimum floor area of 1,800 square feet and seating for 150 people; or except in the case of a Class E license., for a hotel that does not have a dining area, open to the general public, with a total minimum floor area of 1,200 square feet and seating for 100 people. Section 11 -711. CONDITIONS OF LICENSE. 16. A licensed restaurant shall be conducted in such a manner that a significant part of the business for a license year is the serving of foods for consumption on the premises., • • ORDINANCE NO. Section 11 -718. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES. Subdivision 1. Prohibition, Tt is unlawful for any licensee. owner or manager of any establishment licensed under Sections 11 -701 through 11 -718, of this Code to cause. commit, permit or allow in the licensed premises any of the activities listed in this Section or any similar activities or to sell liquor in . any premises from which any such activities may be viewed or heard. Subdivision 2. Prohibited Activities. Activities referred to in Subdivision, 1 of this Section include the following: a. Nudity. sadomasochistic abuse or sexual conduct as those terms are defined in Section 19 -1700 of this Code_ either actual or simulated. b. Mud wrestling. wet T -shirt contests. lingerie shows or displays. or strip -tease dancing. c. The display of any of the foregoing by any means including. but not limited to. books. printed material. magazines. movies. Pictures. videos. plays, exhibitions recordings. closed circuit television, productions, or any other device or contrivance in any way which is capable of being used or adapted to arouse interest. or to affect . the human senses. whether through the medium of reading, observation. sound or any other means. Subdivision 3. Penalty. Violation of this Section is grounds for revocation of any license issued under Sections 11 -701 through 11 -718 of this Code. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of A'I'I'EST: Clerk Mayor ORDINANCE NO. • Date of Publication Effective Date (Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.) • • • ITEM DESCRIPTION: DEPT. APPROVAL: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date A Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER ORDINANCES REGARDING LIQUOR *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Signature - tit flames Lindsay, Chief of Police * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * ** * * * * ** **** ** calr+tyC7F3Ei�rlt if * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * ** ** s **. * * * * ** * * * * ** * ** * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report SUMMARY EXPLANATION: Comments below /attached 9 e— *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** (supplemental sheets attached yes ) The liquor ordinance has been amended to disallow take -out and delivery food from being counted in the food /liquor split figures. This amendment was written at the request of the City Council to eliminate a problem perceived at Lynbrook Bowl. It was felt Lynbrook Bowl was becoming a "neighborhood bar" with a minimum amount of food being consumed on the premises and most being delivered in their take -out service. The staff has met with Steve Nelson from Lynbrook Bowl during the preparation of this amendment. During these meetings, Nelson expressed concern that he was not being given enough time to bring the restaurant into compliance. This additional proposed amendment will give Lynbrook Bowl, which is the only Class C liquor license holder, an additional twelve month period to bring their food /liquor split into compliance. Also during the discussions with Nelson, he has indicated that they are looking at upgrading the restaurant in the future. As part of the City Council discussions on the concerns of the take -out service at the Lynbrook, it was also expressed that the Lynbrook had a limited menu. A copy of the minimum menu offered at the Lynbrook is attached. You will see they do offer a varied menu and the staff feels there is no problem with the menu offered. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the attached ordinance amendment be adopted through the regular process. • • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of ,19 , at p.m. at City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment to Chapter 11 of the city ordinances. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please notify the personnel coordinator at 561 -5440 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER ORDINANCES REGARDING LIOUOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 11 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Section 11 -702 (3) For 1989 on -sale Class C liquor licensees. calculation of the percent of applicable revenue derived from the serving of foods for consumption on the premises shall be made beginning in 1991 for licenses issued for 1992 and subsequent years. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication. 410 Adopted this day of PEST: Clerk Mayor Date of Publication Effective Date (Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.) t Wok CHICKEN FAMILY PACS inc., Chicken, Rolls, Butter, Mashed Potatoes, Grave, & Cole Slaw 3 piece single dinner 5 piece single pac 7 piece family pac 12 piece family pac 15 piece family pac 21 piece family pac PARTY PACS. Chicken Only 10 piece party pacs 15. piece party pacs 21 piece party pacs 26 piece party pacs PARTY SNACKS 15 wings 20 wings „wings wings AI DITIONAL MENU SELECTIONS Chicken pe_f piece ::.uhed Potatoes gravy Baked Beans 6 Dinner Rolls Cole Slaw �, rLTIGERj' .P: • Garlic Bred es� Bred Pizza Bread (add. ind. .25t) Jo -Jo Potatoes 6 ounce Jo -Jo Potatoes 12 ounce RESTAURANT & LOUNGE I94/694 & 252 BROOKLYN CENTER $ 4.99 $ 9. $11.79 $17.29 $22.29 $29.89 $11.59 $15.89 $22.69 $25.89 , $ 8.49 $11.29, $16.49 $ .95 $ 1.50 $ 1.75 $ 1.35 $ 1.95 PIZZA Cheese Pizza 8" $3.50 add. Cheese Onion Gr. Pepper Sausage Pepperoni Can. Bacon Mu shrooM Gr. or Blak. Olive each add. item PIZZA SPECIALS RIBS 2 rack (ribs only) 1 rack (ribs only) COMBO Rib Sandwich w /Jo -Jo's Rib Sandwich Only 10" 12" $4.95 $5.75 items .50t Life Support $6.50 $8.50 (Sausage, Gr. pepper, onions) 14" $6.75 $8.25 $7.60 $9.45 $10.50 911 Special $7.90 , $10.90 $13.45 (Pepperoni, saus., gr. peppers, mushrooms, onions) $21.99 Veggie $7.60 $10.30 $12.75 $ 1.15 2 rack, cole slaw, Jo -Jo's and rolls $ 6.99 $ 1.15 $ 1.15 $ 1.35 $ 1.35 $ 1.35• Jo -Jo Potatoes, cole slaw and rolls. $16.99 1 rac'--:, cole slaw, Jo - Jo's, and rolls $13.49 Dinner for Four includes 12 racks of ribs, 5 pieces chicken, 2 rack.ribs, cole slaw Jo -Jo potatoes,.and rolls $ 5.49 $ 9.99 $15.99 $ 3.50 $ 2.50 24 LANES Telephone 561-4240 iamb Hamb. Bsk. All prices inc. tax Cheeseburger Cheeseburger Bs1:. Fish Fish Bsk. 21 Shrimp Bsk. Hot Dog Hot Dog Bsk. French Fries Onion Rings Mushrooms Cheese Balls • 49461464 Feed 6357 NORTH LILAC DRIVE • MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55430 • • *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** l e ITEM DESCRIPTION: DISCUSSION OF ITEMS RELATING TO WEST RIVER ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1988 -18 *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP;DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *X ********* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ****4 MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: Explanation 4. landscaping plans. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 10/23/89 Agenda Item Number /Oa/ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached On August 28, 1989, following a public hearing on the project, the City Council ordered development of plans for the improvement of West River Road between 66th and 73rd Avenues, and for construction of a pedestrian /bicycle trailway on Willow Lane between I -694 and 66th Avenue. Short - Elliott- Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) are the consulting engineers assigned to develop the construction plans and specifications for this project. SEH's goal is to complete development of semi -final plans by mid - November - for final review by the City, discussion with property owners, and submitted to MNDOT. Four major issues need to be discussed by the City Council, and decisions made on these items, before SEH can complete those semi -final plans. Those four issues are: 1. possible reconfiguration of the West River Road /66th Avenue intersection area; 2. right -of -way acquisition and easement acquisition needs as required for the entire project; and 3. removal of overhead power, telephone and CATV lines - and installation of those facilities underground; and Staff will be prepared to discuss these items on a preliminary "concept" basis at the October 23, 1989 Council meeting. At that time we will ask the Council to provide direction so that more detailed information can be prepared and presented at the following Council meeting (on November 13), and decisions made at that time. • • 17 RESPONSES OUT OF 35 QUESTIONNAIRES SENT 10 YES VOTES 7 NO VOTES COMMENTS - NO VOTES 1. OUR ROAD IS JUST FINE NOW AND THERE IS ROOM FOR BIKE PATH ON WEST SIDE. I HAVEN'T NOTICED ANY AMOUNT OF SPEEDING CARS. IF YOU WANT TO REMOVE LINES, LEAVE ROAD AS IS. 2. WE ARE UNSURE HOW THIS WILL AFFECT THE POWER LINES THAT GO FROM WEST RIVER ROAD TO THE POLE IN OUR BACK YARD. IF THESE LINES WOULD ALSO BE UNDERGROUND AND THAT POLE REMOVED, WE WOULD VOTE YES. COMMENTS - YES VOTES REMOVAL OF OVERHEAD POWER /TELEPHONE /CATV LINES WEST RIVER ROAD 10/20/89 1. THIS SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE $1351 CHARGE. CAN WE GET RID OF THE "U" BEND AT 66TH AND WEST RIVER ROAD? 2. I WOULD ALSO VERY MUCH LIKE TO SEE THE POWER LINE THAT RUNS ALONG THE NORTH EDGE OF MY PROPERTY BETWEEN WEST RIVER ROAD AND WILLOW LANE PUT UNDERGROUND. COULD THIS BE PART OF THE SAME PROJECT? 3. THIS IS THE SECOND BEST OPPORTUNITY TO ACCOMPLISH THIS MODERNIZATION. THE BEST TIME TO HAVE DONE IT WAS TWO YEARS AGO WHEN THE POWER LINES WERE MOVED FROM THE WEST SIDE OF WEST RIVER ROAD TO THE EAST SIDE WITH THE CONSEQUENT LOSS OR MUTILATION OF MANY NATURE TREES. 1 • TO: CITY OF B ROOKLYN CENTER All Property Owners Abutting West River Road Between 66th Avenue North and 73rd Avenue North FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works DATE: August 31, 1989 RE: Removal of Overhead Power /Telephone /CATV Lines Dear Property Owner: 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 On August 28, 1989 the City Council conducted a public hearing regarding proposed roadway improvements and construction of a bicycle /pedestrian trailway on West River Road. Following the public hearing, the City Council adopted a resolution ordering construction of those improvements, specifying that the bicycle /pedestrian trailway be constructed on the west side of West River Road. (Note: The Brooklyn Center Post's August 30 edition incorrectly reported that the Council ordered the trail to be constructed on the east side of West River Road.) For your information, we now expect to complete the design of these improvements, receive bids for this work and place it under contract for construction during 1990. One major item remains undecided at this time. That is the question of whether or not the existing overhead electrical distribution lines, telephone lines and CATV lines should be removed and reinstalled underground as a part of this project. While the aesthetic benefits of this are obvious, it is also noted that, if this is done, both the City's cost participation and your costs will increase, i.e.: o The City's cost participation will increase by approximately $160,000 to cover the costs of changing the transmission lines. No part of these costs would be added to the proposed special assessments against your properties. However, o each property owner who now receives electrical service from the transmission line on West River Road would be required to hire his /her own electrical contractor to convert their service line from overhead to underground. It is estimated that the normal costs for such a conversion would be approximately $200.00. However, these costs may vary considerably with each property. SCI 19b6 All- AAIRKA OTT • • Page Two 0 August 31, 1989 The City Council wishes to receive your opinions and comments regarding this issue before deciding whether or not to include this as a part of the project. Please review the enclosed survey form, complete it and return it to this office, using the enclosed stamped, self - addressed envelope. Should you any questions relating to this matter, please call me. Thank you for your cooperation. Yours very truly, Enclosure Sy Knapp Director of Public Works TO: Sy Knapp Director of Public Works RE: Removing Overhead Electrical, Telephone and CATV Lines from West River Road Comments: Signed: Name: Address: Tel. No. YES, I favor the removal of these lines as a part of the proposed West River Road reconstruction project. NO, I oppose this proposal. Send to: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 10/23/89 Agenda Item Number /C ?/) REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: STATUS REVIEW OF CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PRIORITIES LIST *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: Signature - title *****************************************************#**** * * * * MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: jr** * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** No comments to supplement this report . below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) As a part of the annual planning process for the City of Brooklyn Center, the City Council, its staff, and members of the various commissions have produced a "tentative" list of issues, trends, and projects. The City Council will, in the near future, be reviewing this list and establishing the final priorities. Attached please find a copy of this tentative priority list and the following is to be a review of the status of the top priorities and high priorities (these two categories are not based on any Council ranking; it's an estimate by your staff). TOP PRIORITIES 1. Drug Education and Prevention Program. a. Prevention - As a part of the 1990 Budget, the City Council is considering increases in the police department investigation personnelin the drug enforcement area. b. Education (D.A.R.E. Program) - Council should be aware that the D.A.R.E. Program was to start in all grade schools in Brooklyn Center this fall. However, due to a health problem, Officer Fryer, at this time the only trained D.A.R.E. specialist, this program has been delayed. We currently have Officer Bebensee in training to become a certified D.A.R.E. instructor. We expect Officer Fryer to return from his convalescence in time for both officers to start teaching the program after the first of January when the schools open after the holidays. With two officers teaching in the schools through the spring of 1990, we would expect to serve the same number of children and teach the same curriculum as we would have if we would have had one officer instructing since September of '89. c. Mayor's Drug Task Force - We are currently examining the feasibility of formally designating this task force as an official City commission and expanding its role in the area of employer and business education, as well as the general public awareness. 2. Committee to Review City Building and Park Expansion Needs. The City Council will consider, before the end of 1989, a requested staff report on setting up a citizen's task force to review capital improvement needs for various city buildings, parks, and other facilities. 3. Earle Brown Farm Renovation and Redevelopment. The reconstruction of the Earle Brown Heritage Center is underway, and we would expect the Inn on the farm to be complete and operational in early December and other facilities coming on -line and opening between then and April of 1990. 4. Economic Development Study /Redevelopment Policy. a. Housing Study - The housing study by Lee Maxfield has been completed and the housing and planning commissions are reviewing the study. The City Council has also authorized Publicorp to develop an action plan for implementation of the study in early 1990. A proposed 1990 EDA budget will also consider and propose personnel and other funds to be used in the implementation of the housing study. b. Commercial /Industrial Study - The commercial /industrial study RFP is nearing completion, and we would expect to recommend a contractor for this study early in 1990. c. Policy Development - The development of a complete redevelopment policy will await the implementation and analysis process contained in the commercial /industrial study and the housing study. However, sections of the policy, especially in the housing area, can move along at a much faster rate as we complete the implementation plan as contracted with Publicorp. 5. Proactive Housing Maintenance /Rehab Program. a. Review Current Code Regulations - By early 1990 City staff will report for City Council and advisory commissions on the update of our codes as relates to building maintenance and rehab. b. Nonrehabitable Home Buy -Out Program - Currently we are buying homes that are nonrehabitable and a policy on these buy -outs will be developed as a part of our overall redevelopment plan. (Currently the housing commission is reviewing proposed guidelines.) c. Point -of -Sale Code Compliance - This issue will be reviewed by the housing commission in 1990. d. Housing Study Recommendations - Publicorp is preparing an implementation plan for Council review in early 1990. 6. Battered Youth Program. a. Peacemaker Center - Peacemaker Center is currently finalizing the hiring of a permanent executive director and will be working with the police department on referrals, hopefully by the end of 1989. b. Battered Youth Advocacy Program - This program was started in 1989 and currently there are volunteers working with the police department on this program. Additional expansion of this program will depend on the resources available. 7. Lynbrook Area Redevelopment Program - Currently this project is on hold awaiting the time from the EDA staff necessary to prepare a redevelopment plan or program. 8. Aging Population Service Needs - City Council will have to choose either to make this particular aspect the subject of a specific study or include it in the overall housing redevelopment and other analyses we are going through at this time. The senior center, which is part of this general area, will be evaluated as a part of the capital improvements program committee, which we anticipate to be established before the end of 1989. 9. Redevelopment Plan 69th and Brooklyn Boulevard - The engineering study of 69th is complete, and we anticipate the start of public information meetings on this improvement in early 1990. After the completion of the major EDA work on the Earle Brown Heritage Center, the City Council will have to decide and prioritize this project, along with other EDA projects such as the Lynbrook area redevelopment, and make a decision as to which project should be emphasized by the EDA. 10. Communications Improvement Projects a. Expanded Use of Cable Television - City Council has received approximately $234,000 from the Northwest Cable Commission for the express purpose of improving cable television capability of the City. One of the projects proposed by the staff is to modify the council chambers for cable television by installing the necessary lighting and sound systems which will allow cable casting of City Council and other meetings. b. Expanded Newsletter - We have added two additional issues which brings us up to six annually as a part of the 1989 Budget, and we are looking at ways in which to improve the format and content to communicate more effectively. c. Improve Communications Regarding the Redevelopment Projects, and Policies - This is an area which we have done nothing in recent months as we are still in the process of working on the Earle Brown Heritage Center. We would expect this project not to get much attention until the completion and opening of the Earle Brown Heritage Center. HIGH PRIORITIES 1. Complete the "Top" Priorities of the Park and Recreation Commission by 1994 - This is a project list of park improvements which the park and recreation commission believes should be completed by 1994. These projects would be considered by the capital projects citizens review committee. 2. Residential Treatment Facilities Analysis - Planning commission will be receiving the final reports from the ordinance analysis and the property value analysis and proposed changes should be before the Council in late '89 or early 1990. 3. Maintenance Code for Commercial /Industrial Buildings - The staff work on this project is in its final stages, and it should be before the planning commission, housing commission and City Council in early 1990. 4. Development of a Group Home Siting Process and Plan - Part of this project is in the ordinance study which will be before the council and advisory commissions in early 1990. The other portion of this project is the legislative effort which is in the process of starting up as we will be approving the contract with Boland & Associates within the next 30 days to start their lobbying efforts. This particular lobbying project was stalled by the special session of the Legislature which made it virtually impossible for any lobbying, other than directly relating to that special session, to be done. 5. I- 94/694 Improvement Project - This construction project is anticipated to be mostly completed before the end of 1989. Within the next month or so, a number of the interchanges and lane closures that we've experienced in the late summer and fall will start to open up again. Contracts require the construction company to complete the improvement • • project by June of 1990. We fully expect minor work to be remaining for completion in the spring of '90 but most of the lane closures will be eliminated prior to the worst of the winter of 1989/90. 6. Senior Drop -In Center - This project will be reviewed as part of the citizens capital improvements advisory committee should it be set up. 7. Recycling -Solid Waste Program. a. Recycling Program - Approximately mid 1989 Brooklyn Center started a curbside recycling program which is now in full operatation with a minimum of problems. We are currently reviewing the feasibility of working with Hennepin County to become part of a "pilot project" for plastic recycling. We are also in the process of carefully evaluating the new legislation recently passed as a part of the special session which relates to recycling. b. Coordinated Refuse Hauling - The HRG at this time has evaluated whether or not the communities of Brooklyn Center, Crystal, and New Hope should enter into a coordinated hauling system in which we contract with one or multiple vendors for refuse hauling services on behalf of all the citizens of our communities. At this time we are recommending this project be placed on hold because of the rapidly changing regulations and processes surrounding the handling of solid wastes and the financing of these services. At this time our most recent data indicates that it may not be worth our while to proceed with this type of a project given the environment of uncertainty. 8. Neighborhood Watch Program Expansion - Our part-time crime prevention officer is steadily increasing the number of neighborhood watch programs in the community, and we are rapidly coming to a point where, because of the part-time commitment to this project, we will not have the staff time to service these neighborhood watch groups properly. We are hopeful in the 1991 Budget to increase our commitment in the crime prevention and neighborhood watch area. In 1990 that has taken a secondary position to drug enforcement and possible additions in the street patrol division. We are also hopeful of being able to coordinate the crime watch activities with the proposed neighborhood housing advisory group program. 9. Subsidized Elderly Housing - Currently there is no specific activity or program scheduled in this area. The City Council will have to determine a priority allocation of time and resources. 10. Maintain and Improve Business Climate Diversity - We are working toward this goal by establishing a redevelopment policy in the completion and implementation of the housing study and the commercial /industrial study. REMAINING PRIORITIES 1. Develop Annual Citywide Spring Cleanup Program. 2. Redevelopment Plan 50th and France Avenue Area. 3. Crime Prevention Fund Expansion. 4. Explore Public /Private /Nonprofit Partnership for Social Services. 5. Improve /Expand Public Communications Redevelopment Policies and Projects. 6. Planned Unit Development Ordinance. • • 7. Police Master Plan Study - completed in 1988, updated in 1989. 8. Expand City Use of Newsletter and Cable TV to a Monthly Basis - possible duplication of Top Priority #10. 9. Complete High and Moderate Priorities of Park and Recreation Commission between 1994 -99. 10. Fire Service Master Plan. 11. Develop Intra -City Bus Transportation System. 12. Clean Up Shingle Creek and Palmer Lake Area. 13. Establish Storm Drainage Utility. 14. Develop Residents - Helping- Residents Program. 15. Clean Up along Major Roads (Highway 100 and Brooklyn Boulevard). 16. Seek City Sales Tax and Alternate Sources of Revenue. 17. Make Open Forum a More Inviting and Pleasant Process. 18. Develop a Low -price Cable TV Access for Residents to Government and Public Access Channels. 19. Televise City Council Meetings. 20. Large Capacity Convention Center (2500 +). 21. Develop Cultural Center, Ice Arena, Restaurant Complex. 22. Use a Cleaner or Less Messy Seal Coating Process. enc. 1988 PROJECT 1989 PRIORITIES RANKING STATUS 1. Drug Education and Prevention Program a. Prevention b. Education- D.A.R.E. c. Mayors Drug Task Force 2. Committee to Review City Bldg. and Park Expansion Needs 3. Earle Brown Farm Renovation and Redevelopment 4. Economic Development Study Redevelopment Policy a. Housing Study b. Commercial- Industrial Study c. Policy Development 8. Aging Population Service Needs 18 a. Metro Council Booklet "Blueprint for Local Action" b. Senior Center 1989 BROOKLYN CENTER PRIORITIES 7/26/89 8 1 2 5. Proactive Housing Maintenance/ 12 Rehab Program a. Review current code regulations b. Non - rehabitable home buy -out program c. Point -of -Sale Code Compliance d. Housing Study Recommendations 6. Battered Youth Program 11 a. Peacemaker Center b. Battered youth advocacy program Page 1 Start 1989 Complete 1989 Start 1989 Start 1990 Start 1989 Started 1989 7. Lynbrook Area Redevelopment 4 Holding Program Established 1989 Complete 1989 Start 1989 COUNCIL POLICY FOCUS 1989 - review funding of prevention programs as part of 1989 budget - expand education effort to general public and business community - evaluate formalizing the Drug Task Force - decide whether or not to appoint committee and resolve its makeup - monitor progress - complete review of Housing Study and establish action plan - authorize Comm -Ind Study - complete action plan plan based on Housing Study recommendations - review potential of Peacemaker Center role in this program - review funding requests 1990 budget - awaiting availability of EDA staff time - evaluate next step in servicing our growing elderly population - complete evaluation of need for a senior center (Ad Hoc Comm) 1989 PRIORITIES 9. Redevelopment Plan 69th and Brooklyn Boulevard 10. Communications Improvement Projects a. Expanded use of Cable TV b. Expanded Newsletter (improve circulation) c. Improved communications re: Redevelopment projects, policies, and projects 11. Complete "Top" Priorities of Park and Recreation Commission by 1994 12. Residential Treatment Facilities 9 Analysis (Patchen Property Value Study) 13. Maintenance Code for Commercial Industrial Buildings •14. Development of a Group Home Siting Process and Plan 15. I- 94/694 Improvement Project 16. Senior Drop -In Center 18. Neighborhood Watch Program 16 Expansion 6 10 17. Recycling -Solid Waste Program 13 a. Recycling Program b. Coordinated Refuse Hauling 1988 RANKING 3 7 Page 2 PROJECT STATUS Start 1988 Completed 1989 Completed 1989 Start 1989 Complete 1990 Start 1989 Started 1989 COUNCIL POLICY FOCUS 1989 - engineering study of 69th completed in 1988 (public meeting to be scheduled late in 1989) - evaluate priority of this project - evaluate cost/benefit of various projects - evaluate this project along with other priority projects - establish as priority for staff and advisory commission - provide "seed" money for 1989 -1990 Legislative session lobbying effort - review priority as a part of other City project needs (Ad Hoc Committee) - review feasibility of "Consortium " -based refuse hauling in conjunction with HRG - determine if additional resources should be allocated in 1990 t 1989 PRIORITIES 19. Subsidized Elderly Housing 20. Maintain and Improve Business Climate Diversity 21. Develop Annual City -wide Spring Cleanup Program 22. Redevelopment Plan - 50th and France Avenues 23. Crime Prevention Fund 14 Expansion 24. Explore Public /Private/ Nonprofit Partnership for Social Services 25. Improved /Expanded Public Communications Redevelop- ment, Policies and Projects 26. Planned Unit Development Ordinance 27. Police Master Plan Study 15 28. Expand City Use of Newsletter and Cable TV to a Monthly Basis 29. Complete "High" and "Moderate" Priorities of Park and Recreation Commission between 1994 -99 30. Fire Service Master Plan 17 31. Develop Intra -City Bus Transportation System 32. Clean Up Shingle Creek and Palmer Lake Area 33. Establishment of Storm Drainage Utility 1988 PROJECT RANKING STATUS 5 Page 3 Completed Completed 1989 Completed 1989 COUNCIL POLICY FOCUS 1989 - determine priority allocation -merge with #10 and evaluate as a project - establish redevelop- ment project priorities -fund has expanded into drug education assistance - possible duplicate of #10 and #28 - council will receive Planning Commission draft fall of 1989 - council review annually as part of budget - possible duplicate of #10 and #25 • 1989 PRIORITIES 34. Develop Residents Helping 4110 Residents Program 35. Clean Up Along Major Roads (Hwy. 100 and Brooklyn Blvd.) 36. Seek City Sales Tax and Alternative Revenue Source 37. Make Open Forum a More Inviting and Pleasant Process 38. Develop a Low -price Cable TV Access to Government and Public Access Channels 39. Televise City Council Meeting 40. Large Capacity Convention Center (2,500 +) 41. Develop a Cultural Center, Ice Arena, Restaurant Complex 42. Use Cleaner or Less Messy Seal Coating Process 1988 PROJECT RANKING STATUS Page 4 r o u g h d r a f t Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CREATING THE BROOKLYN CENTER DRUG AWARENESS COMMISSION AND DEFINING ITS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES WHEREAS, there exists a worldwide problem with drug and controlled substance abuse, and it is anticipated that this problem will be with us for an extended period of time; and WHEREAS, the growth of this problem can be mitigated by effective community -by- community education and prevention activities; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center wishes to make a long term commitment to programs and activities which are directed at promoting awareness of drug and alcohol abuse related issues; and WHEREAS, broad citizen participation in the affairs of the community is actively sought and promoted by the City Council on the premise that such participation promotes better community understanding: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the public policy of said City shall be to fulfill its responsibility of being proactive in the area of promoting awareness of drug and alcohol related issues in Brooklyn Center's schools, homes, and work places. /�c BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that there is hereby established within the City of Brooklyn Center a Brooklyn Center Drug Awareness Commission as follows: Subdivision 1. TITLE: This organization shall be known as the Brooklyn Center Drug Awareness Commission. Subdivision 2. SCOPE: The scope of activity of this Commission shall consist of advising the City Council and other Brooklyn Center advisory commissions regarding matters relevant to drug abuse awareness and prevention. Subdivision 3. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Commission is to promote public understanding of drug and chemical abuse issues in the schools, homes, and work places of Brooklyn Center. Subdivision 4. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: In fulfillment of its purpose, the duties and responsibilities of the Commission shall be to: 1. Advise and review relevant matters referred to it by the City Council. 2. Serve as a coordinating entity to support, encourage, and develop cooperation between and among various agencies and individuals interested in drug and chemical abuse education and prevention in our schools, homes and work places. Subdivision 5. COMPOSITION: The Commission shall be composed of a Chairperson and members, all of whom shall be appointed and serve as set forth in Subdivision 6. Subdivision 6. MEMBERS METHOD OF SELECTION -TERM OF OFFICE - REMOVAL: Chairperson: The Chairperson shall be appointed by the Mayor with majority consent of the City Council. The Chairperson may be removed by the Mayor with majority consent of the Council. The Chairperson shall assure fulfillment of the following responsibilities in addition to those otherwise described herein: 1. Preside over meetings of the Commission. 2. Appear or appoint a representative to appear, as necessary, before City advisory commissions and the City Council to present the viewpoint of the Commission in matters relevant to drug and alcohol abuse related issues, as it relates to business under consideration by said commissions or City Council. 3. Review all official minutes of the City Council and other advisory commissions for the purpose of informing the Drug Awareness Commission of matters relevant to drug and alcohol abuse related issues. 4. Provide liaison with other governmental and voluntary organizations on matters relevant to drug and alcohol abuse related issues. Vice Chairperson: A Vice Chairperson shall be appointed annually by the Chairperson from the members of the Commission. The Vice Chairperson shall perform such duties as may be assigned by the Chairperson and shall assume the responsibilities of the chair in the absence of the Chairperson. Members' Term of Office: Members of the Commission shall be appointed by the Mayor with majority consent of the Council. The terms of office shall be staggered three -year terms, except that any person appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the term for which their predecessor was appointed shall be appointed only for the remainder of such term. Upon expiration of their term of office, members shall continue to serve until their successor is appointed and shall have qualified. Terms of office for members of the Commission shall expire on December 31 of the respective calendar years. In the event an appointed Commissioner suffers from an extended illness„ disability, or other activity preventing proper fulfillment of duties, responsibilities, rules and regulations of the Commission, the Commissioner may be temporarily replaced during the temporary leave by an interim Commissioner appointed by the Mayor with majority consent of the City Council. Oualifications for Membership: Members of the Commission shall consist of at least two - thirds Brooklyn Center residents who shall have been residents of said City for at least one year prior to their appointment. The remaining one -third may be nonresidents who, by virtue of their interest or expertise in drug awareness and prevention, can provide service to the community of Brooklyn Center because of their association with business organizations or agencies serving Brooklyn Center. Representation Reauirements: Due regard shall be given by the Mayor in appointing Commission members with geographical distribution within the City, and the representative nature of the Commission in terms of sex, religion, ethnic, racial, age, handicapped employment and employer groups. Conflict of Interest: No Commissioner shall take part in the consideration of any matter wherein he is the applicant, petitioner, or appellant, nor in the consideration of any application„ petition, or appeal wherein his interest might reasonably be expected to affect his impartiality. Resignations- Removal. from Office- Vacancies: Commissioners may resign voluntarily or may be removed from office by the Mayor with consent by majority vote of the City Council. Three consecutive unexcused absences from duly called Commission meetings or unexcused absences from a majority of duly called Commission meetings within one calendar year shall constitute automatic resignation from office. The City staff liaison on the Commission shall inform the Mayor of such automatic resignations. Vacancies in the Commission shall be filled by mayoral appointment with majority consent of the City Council. Compensation: Commissioners shall serve without compensation. Subdivision 7. RULES AND PROCEDURES: The Commission shall adopt such rules and procedures not inconsistent with these provisions as may be necessary for the proper execution and conduct of business. Subdivision 8. MEETINGS: The initial meeting of the Commission shall be convened at the call of the Chairperson within thirty days after appointment by the Council. Thereafter, regular meetings shall be held with date and time to be determined by the Commission. Special meetings may be called by the Chairperson. Subdivision 9. STAFF: The City Manager shall assign one member of the administrative staff to serve as staff to the Commission. The staff member assigned shall perform such clerical and research duties on behalf of the Commission as may be assigned by the Chairperson or the City Manager. Subdivision 10. EX OFFICIO MEMBERS: The Mayor or his Councilperson- appointee shall serve as an ex officio member of the Commission, privileged to speak on any matter but without a vote, and shall provide a liaison ATTEST: between the Commission and the City Council. Date Mayor Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ' and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: ATTEST: Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING SURPLUS PROPERTY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the list of property submitted by the City Clerk at the October 23, 1989, City Council meeting is hereby declared surplus property and is hereby authorized for public sale. Date Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • 301 1974 Yamaha 360 Enduro motorcycle (VIN #446021295) 302 1972 Honda motorcycle (VIN #2027089) 304 1976 Honda motorcycle (VIN #2000761) VEHICLES FOR AUCTION 11/89 303 1976 Chevrolet 4x4 3/4 ton pickup truck (VIN #CKL246J173667) 305 1986 Honda Elite motorscooter (VIN #JH2KF0121GK113792) 306 Bridgestone motorcycle (year unknown) (VIN #22Q006022) 307 1987 Honda Elite motorscooter (VIN #JH2HF0308HS203285) 308 1981 Honda motorcycle (VIN #1HFSC0405BA116033) 309 1980 Honda Moped (VIN #DA011009173) 310 1987 Pontiac Transam (VIN #1G2FWZ1H6HL214322) 88 -07091 88 -13010 88 -22194 89 -07910 89 -09165 89 -09873 89 -10777 89 -13601 89 -15232 89 -18337 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 10/23/89 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION lop *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASE FOR RICHARDSON PARK (FROM SHINGLE CREEK LAND COMPANY AND MR EMS SYSTEMS, INC. FOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS) *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: * * * * * * * * * * * * ****** * DIRECTOR * * * * ** ** PUBLIC * * ****WORKS ********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached The following performance guarantee is recommended for release: Richardson Park Addition 64th and Irving Avenues North between I- 94/694 and Freeway Blvd. Amount of Guarantee - $217,600 Bond Obligor - Shingle Creek Land Company Site improvements, including storm drainage, sanitary sewer, water main, street paving, and survey.monumentation have been completed. This performance bond is recommended for release, subject to verification that the improvements satisfy the conditions specified in the subdivision agreement. • *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASE FOR RLS 1619 (FROM SHINGLE CREEK LAND COMPANY AND MINNESOTA STATE HIGH SCHOOL LEAGUE FOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT 2100 FREEWAY BLVD.) *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 10/7VR9 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION * * * * * * * * * * * * **! *PP4* DIRECTOR * * * * ** PUBLIC ****WORKS ********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached The following performance guarantee is recommended for release: Registered Land Survey Number 1619 Freeway Boulevard and Shingle Creek Parkway Amount of Guarantee - $32,000 Bond Obligor - Shingle Creek Land Company Site improvements, including sanitary sewer facilities, private streets, storm drainage, traffic and parking signs, and survey monumentation have been completed. The performance bond is recommended for release, subject to verification that the improvements satisfy the conditions specified in the subdivision agreement. • • Licenses to be approved by the City Council on October 23, 1989: CHRISTMAS TREE SALES LOT P.Q.T. Company P.Q.T. Company COMMERCIAL KENNEL Brooklyn Pet Hospital and Clinic Inc. GASOLINE SERVICE STATION Davies Water Equipment Co. Thompson Lumber Company ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Willow Lane Elementary School MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Air One Mechanical Company Loop- Belden - Porter Co. RENTAL DWELLINGS Initial: Kenneth 0. Schwendeman Harold and Phyllis Loppnow Joe Sandino Lois Holm Julie K. Anderson Renewal: Real Estate Equities Ralph C. Johnson Tower Investments Helene Ebhardt Rafael Rocha Jonathan Cain Tracy and Ray Rice J. G. Strand Ernest W. Gertzen Carin Lee Rudolph Dennis Tollefson Robert Messersmith Peter S. Kelly Nell Davis SIGN HANGER Thomas Sign Company Venus Sign, Inc. GENERAL APPROVAL. , 1� D. K. Weeks, City Clerk 5040 Brooklyn Blvd. 5801 Xerxes Ave. N. 4902 France Ave. N. 4010 Lakebreeze Ave. N. I' A � 1 4810 North Lilac Drive � / <i� 7020 Perry Ave. N. 6317 Welcome Ave. N. 315 Royalston Ave. N. 4639 France Ave. N. 6109 Lyndale Ave. N. 3834 Oak Street 5841 Zenith Ave. N. 5430 70th Circle N. Chippewa Park Apartments 5440 -44 Bryant Ave. N. 5100 Drew Ave. N. 5639 Girard Ave. N. 5324 -26 James Ave. N. 4207 Lakeside Ave. N. #135 7037 Logan Ave. N. 5329 Penn Ave. N. 5347 -49 Penn Ave. N. 5318 -20 Queen Ave. N. 5328 Queen Ave. N. 5338 Queen Ave. N. 3900 56th Ave. N. 3827 69th Ave. N. 2775 Hilltop Court 10695 Johnson Street / • 0.,2p_)2A City Clerk Sanitarian City Clerk 13k . ---0._&y.2.4.,vt Sanitarian 0.a. O'T Building Official /3k- Building Official Director of Planning J and Inspection