HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981 02-09 CCM Regular Session MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
FEBRUARY 9, 1981
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order
by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:06 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of
Public Works Sy Knapp, Director of Finance Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning
and Inspections Ron Warren, Park and Recreation Director Gene Hagel, City
Attorney Richard Schieffer, Assistant City Engineer Jim Grube, and Administrative
Assistant Brad Hoffman.
INVOCATION
The invocation was offered by Father Lowry of St. Alphonsus Catholic Church.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 26, 1981
Councilmember Gene Lhotka noted that in the second to the last line on page 13
that the word "sign" should be included between the words "exit" and "as ".
There was a motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded by Councilmember Fignar
to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting of January 26, 1981 as
amended. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar,
Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none, the motion passed unanimously.
OPEN FORUM
Mayor Nyquist noted that the Council had not received any requests to use the
Open Forum session at this evening's meeting. He inquired of the audience if
there was anyone present who wished to use the Open Forum session. Mary Jane
Gustafson, representing the Brooklyn Center Historical Society, invited Council
members and all of those present at the Council meeting to attend the 70th
birthday celebration of the City of Brooklyn Center_ She noted that the
celebration was to be held February 15 at 1:00 p.m. at the Brooklyn Center
Civic Center.
FINAL PLAT - MERIWETHER RESTAURANT PROPERTY RLS
City Engineer Sy Knapp stated that the RLS was in conformance with the require-
ments of City Ordinance Chapter 15. However, he noted that the abstract of
title had not been forwarded for review by the City Attorney. He also stated
that the legal description of the parcel does not lend itself to review for
verification of noted length, bearings, and curve data and therefore they were
forced to assume that the land surveyor had correctly depicted the parcel and
all of the data. It was the City Engineer's recommendation that final approval
of the RLS be contingent of receipt of the abstract of title.
The City Engineer, Sy Knapp, also noted that in 1975, the parcel was assessed
$467.20 to have the sanitary sewer service extended to the property line as
part of a previous improvement project. He also stated that our records
indicated that no service line was actually installed. The City Engineer
2 -9 -81 -1-
added that the City should consider some form of credit against the building
permits, SAC charges or other charges receivable by the City. It was his
recommendation that the City Manager be authorized to negotiate the final
settlement with the current property owners for the service extension and a
credit for the previous payment. A brief discussion then ensued and Council -
member Kuefler inquired how the property managed to become assessed. The
City Engineer indicated that it had been part of a previous project but that
the work to extend the sewer service had never been undertaken by some over-
sight. Councilmember Fignar inquired if the City owed something to the
current owners. The City Engineer indicated he felt that the City was
somewhat responsible to the owner. Councilmember Fignar inquired if the
matter had been discussed with the property owner. The City Engineer indicated'`
that a letter had been sent to the owners outlining the problem and acknowledging
the previous payment. There was a motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded
by Councilmember Scott to authorize the City Manager to negotiate a settlement
with the Meriwether Restaurant property owner with regards to the extension of
sanitary sewer service to the property. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist,
Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none, the
motion passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Fignar and seconded by Councilmember
Lhotka to approve the final plat on Meriwether Restaurant property RLS contingent
upon receipt of an abstract of title for review by the City Attorney. Voting
in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott.
Voting against: none, the motion passed unanimously.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND POLICY DISCUSSION
City Manager Gerald Splinter introduced the next agenda item as a discussion of
the City's policy guidelines for industrial development revenue bonds. He
stated that Brooklyn Center has witnessed an increase in the volume of industrial
development bond requests for a number of reasons. First, he noted that because
of the current high interest rates on conventional loans, industrial revenue
bonds offer the only financing available that was financially feasible. Second,
he stated that with the construction upgrading of the highway system around
Brooklyn Center, the undeveloped property within Brooklyn Center has become a
very hot item. He stated that the City will continue to see a great deal of
pressure to develop the areas that remain. He then introduced to the City
Council Bond Attorney Dave Kennedy.
Dave Kennedy then took the opportunity to briefly review the basic principals
involved in municipal tax exempt financing. He added that it was timely for
the Council to be reviewing their industrial development revenue bond guide-
lines because the abuse of IRB's was the current target of the state legislature
as well as federal government. He stated that under the statute, the City has
to make a determination of public benefit for each application that comes before
them. He added that the Council is not bound by its guidelines to approve any
project. He clarified that by indicating that because an applicant has met all
of the criteria set forth in the guidelines does not automatically_ insure the
applicant of an IRB. He noted that on a legal basis each project should stand
on its own merit and emphasized the Council's ability not to grant final approval
to any project for which the Council did not feel there was a public benefit.
He also stated that projects that had received preliminary approval need not be
given final approval if the Council were to find that significant changes had
2 -9 -81 -2-
ogcured in the project since the time'it was first proposed to the Council. He
reviewed a number of potential guidelines the Council could consider incorporating
into the present guidelines. First, he suggested that the Council could consider
limiting industrial development revenue bonds by type. By type he indicated that
the City would issue such financing only to industrial development as opposed to
commercial development. Second, he indicated that the Council could consider
limiting development to a redevelopment area or to'a specified development
district. All other applications outside those areas wouldn't be considered.
Third, the Council might consider limiting the project by dollar amount. He
indicated that there would be a minimum dollar amount for which an IDR would be
considered. Fourth, he suggested that the Council consider limiting the extent
of the project. By limiting the extent of a project, the Council would take the
position that financing would be provided for land and building only to the
exclusion of architectural fees, engineering fees, construction financing costs
and so forth. And fifth, he indicated that consideration of the project should
be done at the time a date is set for the public hearing as opposed to the date
of the public hearing. Mayor Nyquist then inquired if there were any problems,
legal or otherwise, with the City issuing too many industrial development
revenue bonds. Dave Kennedy replied that there is no legal limit or problem
that the City would encounter from issuing IRB's. He also indicated that the
issuance of IRB's has no effect upon the City's bond rating. Councilmember
Kuefler inquired if the Council was empowered to require an equity position on
the project. Dave Kennedy affirmed that the Council could take such a position
but as a practical matter, equity in the project is required by the lender. He
noted that this was especially true in commercial developments. He also
indicated that such -a position might serve to the detriment of the Council in
considering a potential inviting industrial development. Councilmember Scott
inquired if the pressure from the number in dollar amounts of IDR's in the
market today would create competition for the City's placement of municipal
bonds. Dave Kennedy replied that is a rather debatable issue. He added that
experts tend to disagree on the range of effect from no effect to approximately
a point. He indicated that he was of the opinion that it does affect the market
the extent of which he is not sure. City Attorney Schieffer inquired if a
project were to fail after its completion, whether or not there is a possibility
the City would be involved in a law suit. Dave Kennedy replied that there is
always a possibility that the City would become involved in a law suit although
under a private placement it would be doubtful and under a public placement of
the bonds or mortgage it would be probable. He also indicated that while the
City would be sued, the chances of the suing party prevailing were very marginal.
Councilmember Lhotka inquired as to whether or not the City could control who
the lender might be. Dave Kennedy indicated that the City would not desire
direct control and he would advise against it. However, the Council receives
a letter of financial feasibility for each project and if the Council were
unfamiliar with the person reporting on the financial feasibility, it was within
the City's right to retain a financial consultant to review the financial
feasibility of the project and charge such expenses against the applicant.
'Councilmember Kuefler asked if the City sets a precedent on issuing IDR's to
one type of project and refusing it for a similar project. Dave Kennedy replied
that a precedent is not set, that each application has to stand on its own
merits. He likened IDR guidelines to that of the comprehensive plan in its
relationship to the zoning laws. He noted that the zoning law will prevail and
that the comprehensive plan serves only as a guide but is not binding. In the
same vein, IDR guidelines for the Council serve only as guidelines but do not
set precedent or prevail upon the Council or limit their choice. A brief
discussion then followed with Mayor Nyquist thanking Dave Kennedy for his time
and efforts before the Council that evening.
2 -9 -81 -3-
PLANNING COMtIISSION ITEMS
The City Manager introduced Planning Commission Application No. 81010 submitted
by the Classic Car Corporation for determination that assembly of electric cars
is a permitted use in the I -1 zone.
The Director of Planning and Inspections presented and reviewed for the Council
members pages 1 through 3 of the minutes of the January 29, 1981 Planning
Commission meeting and also Planning Commission information sheet no. 81010 for
their review. The Director of Planning and Inspections reviewed the location
of the site. He further stated there was no clear precedent of a similar
determination by the City Council in the past. Therefore the matter was being
brought to the Council for review at this time. He noted there is no new
construction involved with the application only the occupancy of the tenant
spaces in Spec 8 and Spec 6 industrial buildings. He noted that the activity
proposed for the building had been comapred with those of TCR Head Screw Products
and Audio Research. It is noted that the City Manager and the Director of`
Planning and Inspections had an opportunity to review the electric car assembly
operation at the company's current location in Plymouth. The operation involves
taking reconditioned volkswagon chassis and outfitting them with a number of
batteries and then attaching already manufactured single unit fiberglass bodies
to the frames. The process also includes the necessary mechanical work to make
the unit operational. Assembly is done in teams rather than the more conven-
tional assembly line process. Also viewed at the assembly site in Plymouth was
the fiberglassing operation where car bodies are repaired. It is proported by
the applicant in his letter to the Planning Commission that_ the process is
relatively clean and free of obnoxious odors and dirt. The Director of Planning
and Inspections concurred with that observation. He further indicated that the
staff's primary concern is that the manufacturing and assembly be as viewed and
as the applicant indicates and not evolving to a more traditional automobile
assembly plant. He noted that the Planning Commission recommended approval of
Application No. 81010 at its January 29, 1981 meeting. Councilmember Scott
inquired as to the exact location of the proposed assembly plant. Planning
Director Warren indicated that it will be located at the former Onan site„
Councilmember Kuefler inquired as to their explanation or definition of assembly
only. The City Manager Gerald Splinter briefly described the team assembly
process as opposed to the more traditional assembly line procedures of other
plants. Following a brief discussion there was a motion by Councilmember
Fignar and seconded by Councilmember Kuefler to approve Application No. 8
with the three recommendations of the Planning Commission. Voting in favor:
Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting
against: none, the motion passed unanimously.
The City Manager introduced Application No. 81011 submitted by Youth Investment
Foundation who were seeking a special use permit to use the single family
residence at 4800 71st Avenue North for office, counseling, and group meeting
functions of the organization. He added that approval would constitute a
determination that the YIF use is a noncommercial use required for public
welfare in an R -1 district. He stated that the Planning Commission recommended
denial of Application No. 81011 at its January 29, 1981 meeting,
The Director of Planning and Inspections presented and reviewed for the Council
pages 4 through 9 of the Planning Commission minutes of the January 29, 1981
meeting and also the Planning Commission information sheet prepared for
Application No. 81011. He noted that the applicant requests approval of the
special use permit to use the single family residence for office, counseling
2 -9 -81 -4-
and group meeting functions of the Youth Investment Foundation. The property
is zoned R -1 and is bounded by Brooklyn Boulevard on the east, by 71st Avenue
North on the south, by a single family residence on the west and by Creek
` Villa Townhouses on the north. He stated that special uses, permitted in R -1
zones include "other uses required for public welfare and an
R -1 district has determined by the Council He stated that approval of the
application would involve a determination that the use described by the
applicant is required for the public welfare in an R -1 district. He noted the
religious uses proposed for the site and stated that religious uses such as
chapels, churches, temples and synagogues are separately acknowledged special
uses which are permitted "provided primary vehicular access shall be gained to
the uses by a collector or arterial street ". He also stated that the Zoning.
Ordinance requires measures be taken to provide ingress, egress and parking so
designed as to minimize traffic congestion in public streets.
Following Planning Director Warren's review, Mayor Nyquist opened the public
hearing on the matter. Mayor Nyquist recognized Mr. Pearson, 4812 71st Avenue
North. Mr. Pearson requested that the Council deny this special use permit.
He indicated to the Council that he felt that the proposed use would generate
too much of a parking problem for the neighborhood and that the use was not
suitable to a residential neighborhood. Mayor Nyquist then recognized Mr. Lew
Terzich of 4825 71st Avenue North. Mr. Terzich objected to the proposed use
reiterating the same reasons as Mr. Pearson. Mayor Nyquist then recognized
Delphine Pallum of 4800 71st Avenue North. She noted that she lives in the
house at the site and indicated that she felt it was a perfect location for
the proposed use. She stated that the house is somewhat isolated from the rest
of the neighborhood and that it is generally too noisy for a family. Mayor
Nyquist then recognized Mr. Thayen, the applicant. Mr. Thayen requested the
Council look at the letters that have been submitted from residents next to
other YIP locations. He noted that the potential problems that had been
expressed to the Council, especially the parking, had not been experienced at
other sites. He also indicated that he had spoken to United Methodist Church
and there was a possibility that they would let them use their parking lot. He
said he felt the property was beneficial because it offered a home atmosphere,
its location was readily accessible and it was close to the schools with which
he would be working. Councilmember Fignar inquired as to the funding for YIF.
Mr. Thayen implied that it was a nonprofit corporation that received donations
from churches, individuals and companies. Councilmember Fignar then inquired
if their counseling is strictly for the children within that district or would
they accept children from anywhere. Mr. Thayen indicated that the emphasis
would be on children from this area but that no child would be precluded from
the program. Councilmember Lhotka inquired as to the types of problems they
dealt with. Mr. Thayen indicated that they dealt with a wide variety of
problems including family, social, drug and other problems. He indicated that
they did not function as a treatment center. Councilmember Scott requested
the applicant to describe their year round camp operation. The applicant, Mr.
Thayen, briefly described the YIF camp noting that it was their philosophy to
maintain contact with the youths that attend the camp once they have left. He
noted that children at the camp receive closer attention from the counselor.
Councilmember Fignar inquired as to how long YIF had been in existance. Mr.
Thayen indicated that they have been counseling youths since 1970. The applicant
further stated that they were seeking either approval of the special use permit
2 -9 -81 -5-
or their request was that the Council refer the matter back to the Planning
Commission for further discussion. Planning Director Ron Warren indicated
the use is more appropriate in a C -1 zone and that was the intent of the
Planning Commission in their recommendation for denial. Councilmember Scott
indicated that she is very familiar with the work of the foundation and she
spoke very highly of them. However, she noted that the location selected by
the YIF organization presented some problems for the Council that would
establish the precedent that would create problems for them in the future.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember
Lhotka to close the public hearing. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Council -
members Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none, the motion
passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded by Councilmember
Fignar to deny Planning Application No. 81011 based upon the three recommenda-
tions of the Planning Commission. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Council-
members Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none, the motion
passed unanimously. Councilmember Lhotka inquired as to why Planning
Commissioner Malecki had not voted on the matter. Planning Director Warren
indicated she was of the opinion that the use of the special permits had not
been discussed in great enough detail to allow her to make a decision on that
matter.
RECESS _
The Council recessed at 9:05 and reconvened at 9:20 p.m.
RESOLUTIONS
The City Manager introduced the first resolution establishing Street Improve -
ment Project No. 1981 -02. City Engineer Sy Knapp noted that because of the
purchase and development of the property north of Brookdale Ford by Commercial
Partners Inc., the Engineering Department's recommending construction of right
and left turn lanes for north and southbound roadway exits to the commercial
development. In addition, he recommended construction of left turn lanes
along the median at John Martin and Summit Drives to provide for left turn,
northbound to westbound traffic movements to the new Hennepin County library
complex. He also proposed modifications for the median adjacent to the City
Hall -Civic Center complex. He noted that the median reconstruction had been
designed to accommodate a projected increase in southbound, eastbound turning
movements in the Shingle Creek Parkway -Summit intersection. Median closures
were recommended at the south access to the City Hall and the currently
baracaded Civic Center access.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -40
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1981 -02,
ACCEPTING CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICA-
TIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.
1981 -02
2 -9 -81 -6-
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Gene Lhotka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
The City Manager then introduced resolution to establish Street Reconstruction
Project No. 1981 -03. The City Engineer noted that his department had under-
taken the redesign of Xerxes Avenue North from T.H. 100 to County Road 10
adjacent to the Brookdale Shopping Center. He stated that normal design
standards anticipate a useful life of 20 years for pavement structures, with a
possible 5 to 10 years service lift extension upon proper and timely use of
bituminous overlays. He added that in this case the existing roadway structures
which were placed in 1961 have shown signs of marked deterioriation for a number
of years. He also stated that curb and gutter installations for these streets
have also shown premature deterioriation. He stated that special considerations
should be given to possible funding sources. He noted that whereas Xerxes
Avenue is a municipal state aid street, it is therefore eligible for MSA
construction funding although 55th and 56th Avenues are not. He stated the
City does have the option of adding the two roadways to the MSA street system
and that the staff would recommend such action be taken. He also stated that
the project does benefit the adjoining properties in the area and recommended
special assessments be levied to the benefit of the properties. He recommended
the City Council consider a reduction of assessible project costs by an amount
corresponding to pavement structures surface lift not realized. He recommended
33% reduction in total assessible project costs. He indicated that special
assessment rates may be established by the various methods including the area
method or the front foot method. The staff recommended that the Council
consider the area method of assessment with provisions for establishing
establishment of zones of benefit. Following a brief discussion of the proposed
assessment plan, Councilmember Kuefler indicated that he felt the majority of
the traffic that was generated by Brookdale and not the other properties that
would benefit from the road construction. He expressed a concern that Brookdale
was there longer and had made more use of the roadway even before the others
were even established. He expressed his concern that the assessment to the
benefit of properties be equitable. The City Engineer stated that the assess-
ments would be based on total area, therefore the majority of assessment
would go to the Brookdale Shopping Center.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -41
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING XERXES AVENUE, 55TH AVENUE, 56TH AVENUE, STREET
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 1981 -03, ACCEPTING CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1981 -03
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
2 -9 -81 -7-
The City Manager introduced a resolution calling for the establishment of
municipal state aid streets.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -42
Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon,.the following voted
in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
The City Manager introduced a resolution establishing a City purchasing policy.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -43
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A CITY PURCHASING POLICY
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
The City Manager introduced a resolution recognizing the public service of
Mr. Daniel Erickson.
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -44
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC
SERVICE OF MR. DANIEL ERICKSON
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
BROOKLYN CENTER'S 75TH ANNIVERSARY
A brief discussion ensued relative to preparation for Brooklyn Center's 75th
Anniversary to occur.in February of 1986. There was general support for some
form of celebration. It was agreed that there be merit to contacting people
in the community to determine what types of celebrations would be appropriate.
There was a motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded by Councilmember
Fignar to bring the matter back before the Council one year from this date.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and
Scott. Voting against: none, the motion passed unanimously.
LICENSES
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Fignar
to approve the following list of licenses:
2 -9 -81 -8-
BULK VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
Brooklyn Center Lions Box 29092
CIGARETTE LICENSE
Coca Cola Bottling Midwest 1189 Eagan Ind. Rd.
Hoffman Engineering 6530 James Ave. N.
Servomation 7490 Central Ave. N.
Graco 6820 Shingle Cr. Pkwy
FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
Arthurs Treacher's Fish & Chips 6100 Brooklyn Blvd.
Brooklyn Center Evangelical Free Church 6830 Quail Ave. N.
Brooks Superette 6800 Humboldt Ave. N.
Denny's Restaurant 3901 Lakebreeze Ave. N.
Duoos Bros. Am. Legion Post #630 4307 70th Ave. N.
Fanny Farmer Candy Shops, Inc. Brookdale Shopping Ctr.
Frontier Fruit & Nut Co. Brookdale Shopping Ctr.
Garden City School 3501 65th Ave. N.
Jerry's Brookdale Super Valu 5801 Xerxes Ave. N.
Maid of Scandinavia Co. Westbrook Mall
Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home 5401 69th Ave. N.
Marc Big Boy 5440 Brooklyn Blvd.
Nature Food Center, Inc. Brookdale Shopping Ctr.
Num -Num Foods, Inc. 3517 Hennepin Ave.
Brookdale Snack Bar Brookdale Shopping Ctr.
Orchard Lane School 6201 Noble Ave. N.
Peking Place 5704 Morgan Ave. N.
Poppin Fresh Pie Shop 5601 Xerxes Ave. N.
Brookdale Country Store 5425 Xerxes Ave. N.
Winchell's Donut House 1912 57th Ave. N.
MECHANICAL SYSTEM'S LICENSE
Central Heating & Air Conditioning 1971 Seneca Road
Rouse Mechanical, Inc. 11348 K -Tel Drive
NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
Canteen Company 6300 Penn Ave. S.
Iten Chevrolet 6701 Brooklyn Blvd.
M.T.C. 6845 Shingle Cr. Pkwy.
N.W. Bell 6540 Shingle Cr. Pkwy.
Cass Screw Company 4748 France Ave. N.
Christy's Auto 5300 Dupont Ave. N.
Coca Cola Bottling Midwest 1189 Eagan Ind. Rd.
Ault Corp. 1600 Freeway Blvd.
Brookdale Car Wash 5500 Brooklyn Blvd.
Brookdale Chrysler Plymouth 6121 Brooklyn Blvd.
Brooklyn Center Ind. Park 6120 Earle Brown Dr.
Cat Pumps 1600 65th Ave. N.
Earle Brown Apts. 1701 69th Ave. N.
Garden Ctiy School 3501 65th Ave. N.
2 -9 -81 -9-
Coca Cola Bottling Midwest Continued
Hoffman Engineering 6530 James Ave. N.
Holiday Inn 1501 65th Ave. N.
K -Mart 5930 Earle Brown Dr.
Midwest Federal 5545 Xerxes Ave. N.
J.C. Penney Brookdale Shopping Ctr.
Perkins Cake & Steak 5915 John Martin Dr.
Precision Inc. 3415 N. 48th Ave.
Razor Court 5740 Brooklyn Blvd.
St. Paul Book & Stationery 5810 Xerxes Ave. N.
State Farm Office 6415 Brooklyn Blvd.
Willow Lane School 7030'Perry Ave. N.
Dale Tile Company 4825 France Ave. N.
Davies Water Equipment 4010 Lakebreeze Ave. N.
First Brookdale State Bank 5620 Brooklyn Blvd.
R.E. Fritz Company 8511 10th Ave. N.
Ault, Inc. 1600 Freeway Blvd.
Interstate United Corp. 1091 Pierce Butler Rte.
State Farm Ins. 5930 Shingle Cr. Pkwy.
Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home 5401 69th Ave. N.
Midwest Bolt & Supply Co. 6820 Shingle Cr. Pkwy.
Northomation Systems 7421 Bush Lake Rd.
Brookdale Pontiac 6801 Brooklyn Blvd.
Northwest Microfilm, Inc. 1600 67th Ave. N.
Red Owl Stores Inc. dba Country Store 5425 Xerxes Ave. N.
Servomation 7490 Central Ave. N.
Graco 6820 Shingle Cr. Pkwy
Twin City Vending Co. 1065 East Highway 36
Earle Brown Farm Ind. Park 6100 Summit Dr.
Viking Pioneer Distr. 5200 West 74th Street
LaBelle's 5925 Earle Brown Dr.
PERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
Canteen Company 6300 Penn•Ave. S.
Iten Chevrolet 6701 Brooklyn Blvd.
M.T.C. 6845 Shingle Cr. Pkwy.
N.W. Bell 6540 Shingle Cr. Pkwy.
Coca Cola Bottling Midwest 1189 Eagan Ind. Rd.
Hoffman Engineering 6530 James Ave. N.
Interstate United Corp. 1091 Pierce Butler Rte.
State Farm Ins. 5930 Shingle Cr. Pkwy.
Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home 5401 69th Ave. N.
Northomation Systems 7421 Bush Lake Rd.
Brookdale Pontiac 6801 Brooklyn Blvd.
Northwest Microfilm, Inc. 1600 67th Ave. N.
Red Owl Stores, dba Country Store 5425 Xerxes Ave. N.
Servomation 7490 Central Ave. N.
Graco 6820 Shingle Cr. Pkwy.
Viking Pioneer Distr. 5200 West 74th Street
LaBelles 5925 Earle Brwon Dr.
SPECIAL FOOD HANDLING LICENSE
Consolidated Toy Co. 6020 North Lindbergh Blvd.
Toy City Store 6000 Earle Brown Dr.
Snyder Bros. Drug Brookdale Shopping Ctr.
2 -9 -81 -10-
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and
Scott. Voting against: none, the motion passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Fignar
to prepare resolutions of appreciation for Mary Ellen Vetter and Henry Dorff.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and
Scott. Voting against: none, the motion passed unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Fignar
to adjourn the meeting. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers
Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none, the motion passed
unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 10:17 p.m.
Cl rk Mayor
2 -9 -81 -11-