Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991 05-13 CCP Regular Session CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MAY 13, 1991 7 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Opening Ceremonies 4. Open Forum 5. Council Reports 6. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda -All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed form the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 7. Approval of Minutes: *a. April 22, 1991 - Regular Session 8. Presentation: a. Ken Schrader, MNDOT 9. Ordinances: a. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 19 of the City Ordinances Regarding Public Nuisances and Petty Offenses -This amendment addresses trespassing on school property and other activities occurring on school property. This item is offered this evening for a first reading. b. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 3 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter (7:15 p.m.) -This ordinance was offered for a first reading on April 8, 1991, published in the City's official newspaper on April 17, 1991, and is offered this evening for a second reading. c. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of the City Ordinances Relating to Recycling Services for Multifamily Dwellings (7:15 p.m.) -This ordinance was offered for a first reading on April 8, 1991, published in the City's official newspaper on April 17, 1991, and is offered this evening for a second reading. Additional amendments have been recommended by the Attorney for the HRG. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- May 13, 1991 d. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 17 of the City Ordinances Regarding Personnel (7:15 p.m.) -This ordinance was offered for a first reading on April 8, 1991, published in the City's official newspaper on April 17, 1991, and is offered this evening for a second reading. e. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 1 of the City Ordinances Regarding Animals (7:30 p.m.) -This ordinance was offered for a first reading on April 22, 1991, published in the City's official newspaper on May 1, 1991, and is offered this evening for a second reading. f. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Zoning Classification of Certain Land (Twin View Meadows) (7:30 p.m.) -This ordinance was offered for a first reading on March 25, 1991, published in the City's official newspaper on April 3, 1991, was tabled on April 22, 1991, and is offered this evening for a second reading. 10. Discussion Items: a. Update on the Status of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Regulations b. Evergreen Park School Playground Project C. Controlling Driveway Widths and Paving in Front Yards and Yards Abutting a Public Street d. Legislative Update 11. Resolutions: a. Establishing Project and Accepting Proposal for Geotechnical Services for Trail Improvement, Improvement Project No. 1991 -07 (Replacement of a Portion of Trail in Central Park, and Surfacing of Trail on 53rd Avenue Extension South of Centerbrook Golf Course) b. Accepting Bids and Awarding Contracts for Removal of Houses on 69th Avenue North, Phase II, Improvement Project No. 1991 -02 *c. Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract for 1991 Diseased Tree Removal, Improvement Project No. 1991 -06, Contract 1991 -G CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- May 13, 1991 *d. Approving Plans and Specifications and Directing g Advertisement for Bids, Water Distribution System Improvement, Improvement Project No. 1990 -03, Contract 1991 -C (Watermain Construction in the Vicinity of 69th Avenue North and Dupont Avenue North, at Tower No. 2) *e. Approving Plans and Specifications and Directing Advertisement for Bids for Humboldt Avenue /65th Avenue Landscaping, Improvement Project No. 1991 -03, Contract 1991 -D *f. Accepting Work Performed under Contract 1990 -E, Signal System Improvements on Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue North at Shingle Creek Parkway, at Humboldt Avenue, and at Dupont Avenue, Improvement Project Nos. 1988 -25, 1990- 11 and 1990 -12 g. Approving Plans and Specifications and Directing Advertisement for Bids, 1991 Sealcoating, Improvement Project No. 1991 -05, Contract 1991 -F *h. Accepting Work Performed and Authorizing Final Payment under Improvement Project No. 1990 -20, for Replacement of Boiler Burners for HVAC System Serving the Civic Center i. Authorizing Entry into a Joint Powers Agreement in the Form of a Declaration of Trust Establishing an Entity Known as "Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund" and Authorizing Participation in Certain Investment Programs in Connection Therewith j. Amending the 1991 General Fund Budget to Provide for Purchase of Census Information k. Authorizing Replacement of Damaged Police Vehicle and Amending the 1991 General Fund Budget 1. Declaring Earle Brown Days as a Civic Event from June through June 12. License to Utilize Explosives for the Howe Company *13. Licenses 14. Adjournment C O R R E C T I O N residential property. The Director of Public Works indicated the analysis would result in an average number for each type of property i.e. single-family residential) ( g y and would not be based upon the number of vehicles owned by an individual. Councilmember Pedlar questioned what the costs might be and whether the taxes citizens already pay should be expected to cover transportation - related services. The Director of Public Works indicated costs were not able to be estimated at this point. In response to Mayor Paulson's question, the Director of Public Works indicated the revenue generated from this type of utility would be available for use for trains also. Councilmember Cohen felt the proposed tax was a complicated method of addressing a need which could be met more staightforwardly by a wheelage tax, if warranted. The Director of Public Works indicated the advantage of the proposed utility versus a wheelage tax was that the utility could be collected by the City without being routed through State government. Mayor Paulson commented on a potential problem of the utility, which was there would be no dis- incentive to use. He felt encouraging lesser use of vehicles would Iead to more efficient transportation. The Director of Public Works concurred. Councilmember Rosene referring to a wheelage tax, noted if encouraging alternative forms of transportation were successful, funding would then diminish due to decreased vehicle use and thus fees paid. Councilmember Cohen stated he supported the proposed resolution as a potential tool for the City's use, but requested the experience of other communities be solicited in order to estimate revenue generated. The Director of Public Works indicated that information was not currently available, but the City would rely on such information in the future before implementing a transportation utility. As a rough guideline, the Director of Public Works indicated the storm /sewer utility fee generated approximately $260,000 for the City. He stated if the transportation utility were to generate a similar amount, it would make a substantial contribution to the $1.5 million annual cost of street repair and maintenance. In response to Councilmember Pedlar's question, the Director of Public Works indicated most other communities were supporting the option to establish a transportation utility in the future. Councilmember Pedlar was reluctant to support the measure without more information on costs. The City Manager stated the City would make an effort to thoroughly analyze estimated costs and anticipated revenue as the information became available in the future before proposing use of the utility. Councilmember Cohen commented he felt the issue would send a message to the State that cities were competent to make the right decision for their citizens in this area without State intervention. Councilmember Rosene indicated the issue of how to make the utility fair for residents of major roads (Le. Humboldt Avenue) would need to be addressed. He commented if adopted by other communities, the utility could provide better roads and better transportation throughout the metro area. 491 /8i -9- RESOLUTION NO. 91 -114 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING LEGISLATION TO AUTHORIZE ESTABLISHMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UTILITIES The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dave Rosene, and the motion passed unanimously. NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES The City Manager briefly reviewed consideration of membership in the National League of Cities and indicated dues were $1,162 annually. There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Scott directing the City Manager to prepare a resolution providing for membership in the National League of Cities and reappropriating $1,162 from the budget for dues. Vote: Four ayes. The motion passed. Councilmember Cohen abstained. RECOMMENDATION TO PURCHASE ACCIDENT INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR CITY VOLUNTEERS The City Manager briefly reviewed this item. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Rosene directing the City Manager to prepare a resolution providing for the purchase of accident insurance coverage for City volunteers. The motion passed unanimously. _RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED) The City Manager reviewed a proposed resolution for the purpose of establishing a Brooklyn Center Ad Hoc Financial Task Force Committee. In regard to membership of the task force, Councilmember Rosene suggested the resolution be amended to provide for membership of a City staff member, with preference given to those residing in Brooklyn Center. The City Manager explained there would be provisions for extensive employee involvement and input; however, he felt it would be best not to have a member of staff directly on the committee as it could perhaps place that employee under undue pressure from co- workers. He felt that getting input from staff members without singling them out as the focus of attention would be preferable. Councilmember Pedlar concurred and the Council agreed the City Manager would work with Councilmember Pedlar to establish an employee input process. 4/8/91 - 10- MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION APRIL 22, 1991 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Todd Paulson at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Todd Paulson, Councilmembers Celia Scott, Jerry Pedlar, Dave Rosene, and Philip Cohen. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Works Sy Knapp, Director of Planning and Inspection Ron Warren, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, Finance Director Paul Holmlund, Personnel Coordinator Geralyn Barone, City Engineer Mark Maloney, Public Works Coordinator Diane Spector, Director of Recreation Arnie Mavis, and Council Secretary Carla Wirth. OPENING CEREMONIES The invocation was observed with a moment of silence for personal reflection. OPEN FORUM Mayor Paulson noted the Council had not received any requests to use the open forum session this evening. He inquired if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council. There being none, he continued with the regular agenda items. COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Pedlar reminded those present that Park Clean -Up Day had been scheduled for May 4th from 9 a.m. to noon. The Director of Recreation asked Councilmembers to inform him if they will be attending so work can be scheduled accordingly. Mayor Paulson suggested, and Council agreed, to consider agenda item 9, Presentation by Hennepin County Commissioner John Derus, at this time. PRESENTATION: JOHN DERUS COUNTY COMMISSIONER Mayor Paulson welcomed Hennepin County Commissioner John Derus to the meeting. 4/22/91 - 1 - s Commissioner Derus provided a report on various matters before the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners including County services, budget cutbacks, Light Rail Transit (LRT) and ethanol usage in County vehicles. He informed the Council that Anoka County and other communities were now using ethanol and encouraged the Council to consider supporting a resolution to use ethanol for their fleet of vehicles. Councilmember Rosene thanked Commissioner Derus for his presentation and questioned the County's innovative use of natural gas for vehicles. Commissioner Derus noted Hennepin County currently had several pickup trucks using propane but no pilot program using natural gas. Commissioner Derus pointed out that Minnesota was a "fuel poor state" which makes it important to look at the use of renewable resources such as ethanol. Councilmember Cohen noted the downside of ethanol use, which was decreased gas tax revenues for use in road maintenance. Councilmember Cohen questioned State contributions towards the County budget in relation to mandated programming. Commissioner Derus explained the process of State mandated programing which was only funded for the first year. Councilmember Cohen expressed the need for Brooklyn Center and other communities to work closer with their County Commissioner. Commissioner Derus agreed and explained the need to also gain support from outlying communities. He then explained the use of soybean ink and that Hennepin County requires its use for all their printed material. Councilmember Scott expressed her concern with the detox and welfare programs, noting her support of purchasing these people a one -way bus ticket back to their homes. Commissioner Derus pointed out he authored the "Bus Ticket Back Program" and shares Councilmember Scott's frustration. The matter was tried at the Fourth Judicial Court and an injunction ordered to stop the program. Commissioner Derus noted that many welfare program users were the elderly through the use of medical assistance. Councilmember Scott complimented Hennepin County on their proactive program of sending welfare department case workers to the site of drug raids to care for the children. Mayor Paulson voiced his support of a Brookdale LRT terminal and his feeling that the current proposal will have a long -term negative impact by pulling revenues out of Brooklyn Center and into other communities. He urged Commissioner Derus to commit to supporting a Brookdale spur in the LRT 20 -year plan. Commissioner Derus responded that he had always supported a Brookdale terminal; however, due to several factors, including the cost of dealing with a freeway overpass, the LRT Advisory Committee recommended an alternate route. Another consideration was the resolution adopted by Brookdale against an LRT terminal since they felt people would use their parking lot to take LRT to their job. Mayor Paulson asked if Commissioner Derus would support a Brookdale terminal within the 20 -year plan. Commissioner Derus restated that he had always supported it, but it would be very difficult at this time to gain enough support from the LRT Advisory Committee to add it to the 20 -year plan. The Mayor and Council 4/22/91 - 2 - thanked Commissioner Derus for his presentation and continued support of Brooklyn Center. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Paulson inquired if any Councilmembers requested any items removed from the consent agenda to which the City Manager requested removal of Item 13d. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Rosene clarified the third paragraph of page 9 as follows: "Councilmember Rosene referring to a wheelage tax, noted if encouraging alternative forms of transportation were successful, funding would then diminish due to decreased vehicle use and thus fees paid. APRIL 8. 1991 - REGULAR SESSION There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve the minutes of the April 8, 1991, regular session as amended. The motion passed unanimously. PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 26 1991 AS EUGENE H. HAGEL DAY Mayor Paulson briefly reviewed this item. There was a motion b Councilmember Scott and seconded b Councilmember Pedlar Y Y to approve a Proclamation Declaring April 26, 1991, as 'Eugene H. Hagel Day." The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 91 -120 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING 1991 PAY PLAN The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded b member P g g Y Y Jerry Pedlar, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -121 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR DELIVERY OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET OF RUBBER FLOORING FOR PARK BUILDINGS 4/22/91 - 3 - The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member 0 Jerry Pedlar, and the motion passed unanimously. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to approve the final plat for the Brooklyn United Methodist Church addition subject to the development and filing of an encumbrance agreement meeting the approval of the City Attorney. The motion passed unanimously. LICENSES There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to approve the following list of licenses: FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Brooklyn United Methodist Church 7200 Brooklyn Blvd. Kids Play 5611 Xerxes Avenue N. Korean Presbyterian Church of T.C. 6830 Quail Avenue N Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home 5401 69th Avenue N. Spiritual Life Ministries 6500 Shingle Crk. Pky. Subs, Etc. 6048 Shingle Crk. Pky. T. Wright's 5800 Shingle Crk. Pky. ITINERANT FOOD LICENSE Brooklyn Center Fire Department 6301 Shingle Crk. Pky Brooklyn Center Park & Recreation 6301 Shingle Crk. Pky Malmborg's 5120 North Lilac Drive MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Air Comfort, Inc. 3944 Louisiana Circle Air Corp., Inc. 13005 16th Avenue N. Air Furnace Care, Inc. 8733 Humboldt Avenue N. Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. P.O. Box 237 Cronstrom's Heating and A/C 7201 West Lake Street Delmar Furnace Exchange 4080 83rd Avenue N. Egan & Sons Co. 7100 Medicine Lake Road Faircon Service 2668 Patton Road Golden Valley Heating & A/C 5182 West Broadway Harris Mechanical Contracting Co. 2300 Territorial Road Louis Degidio, Inc. 6501 Cedar Avenue S. Maple Grove Heating & A/C 8870 Zealand Avenue N. Marsh Heating & A/C Co., Inc. 6248 Lakeland Avenue N. 4/22/91 - 4- MECHANICAL SYSTEMS (Continued) Minnesota Heating & A/C 6908 Georgia Avenue N. Modern Heating & A/C 2318 First Street NE R & S Heating & A/C 21357 Hemlock Avenue Southern Mechanical, Inc. 900 B & H Industrial Ct. Ray Welter Heating Co. 4637 Chicago Avenue S. MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIP Brookdale Ford, Inc. 2500 County Road 10 Brookdale Pontiac 6801 Brooklyn Blvd. Iten Chevrolet 6701 Brooklyn Blvd. RENTAL DWELLINGS Initial: Lyle E. Miller 3501 47th Avenue N. Joan M. Decheine 3207 68th Avenue N. Renewal: Norman Chazin Brookdale Manor Apartments Norman Chazin Four Courts Apartments Vinh and Ha Ly 6007 Brooklyn Blvd. Kenneth O. Schwendeman 4639 France Avenue N. Terry L. Hartmann/H.E. Homes 6827 Fremont Place Richard Olson 5818 Humboldt Avenue N. Marcus Corporation 6415 James Circle North Norbert & Delores Volbert 4207 Lakeside Avenue N. #122 Ethel and Lambert Ackermann 4207 Lakeside Avenue N. #234 Gary Scherber 4708 Lakeside Avenue N. William P. Kelly 5724 Logan Avenue N. Tracy Rice 6907 Morgan Avenue N. Joe Sandino 3834 Oak Street Larry Pederson 5401 63rd Avenue N. Merle G. Biggs 3910 65th Avenue N. Lawrence R. Florian 857 -861 70th Avenue N. Robert W. Rode 869 70th Avenue N. S. Richard Silverness 873 -877 70th Avenue N. James R. Hokanson 881 -885 70th Avenue N. SPECIAL FOOD HANDLING ESTABLISHMENT C.W.'s Corner/Holiday Inn 2200 Freeway Blvd. SIGN HANGER Anchor Signs, DBA Universal Sign Co. 1033 Thomas Avenue Nordquist Sign Company, Inc. 312 West Lake Street 4/22/91 - 5 - SWIMMING POOLS Bennie Rozman Brookdale Ten Apartments The motion passed unanimously. MAYORAL APPOINTMENTS HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESOURCES COMMISSION NORTHWEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL ADVISORY COMMISSION Mayor Paulson reviewed the existing vacancies for the Human Rights and Resources Commission and the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council as well as the applications received for said vacancies. He expressed his desire to see a more equal gender balance on these commissions. Councilmember Rosene concurred. There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Cohen to approve the following appointments: NWHHSC Advisory Commission - Jerry Eiserman, term expires 12/31/92. HR &RC - Sharon Achtelik, term expires 12/31/93, Julie Eoloff, term expires 12/31/93, and Kate Windsor, term expires 12/31/92. The motion passed unanimously. ORDINANCES The City Manager presented an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1 of the City Ordinances Regarding Animals. He explained it will provide one more step in the private kennel licensing process to allow the initial review to be conducted by the City Manager with the opportunity to appeal to the City Council. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to approve for first reading an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1 of the City Ordinances Regarding Animals and setting a public hearing date of May 13, 1991, at 7:30 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The City Manager noted a public hearing was required for the second reading of An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Zoning Designation of Certain Land (Proposed Twin View Meadows). In response to Councilmember Cohen's question, the Director of Planning and Inspection reviewed the area proposed for rezoning and explained that the Council must adopt a housekeeping type of ordinance amendment which describes the land being rezoned under its new zoning designation based on the new legal description contained in the plat. He recommended the Council hold the public hearing as scheduled but not adopt the ordinance until the City had proof that the plat had been filed with the County. 4/22/91 - 6 - Mayor Paulson opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Zoning Designation of Certain Land (Proposed Twin View Meadows) at 8:03 p.m. He inquired if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council. Dan Middlested, 5120 East Twin Lake Boulevard, stated he lives in this area. He reminded the Council that today was Earth Day, and he was concerned about loss of wildlife in Outlots A and B due to the proposed roadway. He requested the Council table final plat approval to allow residents additional time to prepare an alternative roadway (cul -de -sac) to preserve the trees, natural area and its wildlife. Mayor Paulson responded that this was a matter to be considered during final plat approval. He noted the general consensus from area residents was that they were comfortable with this development but concerned with street design. Mr. Middlested agreed that he was not opposed to the proposed 25 lots. The City Manager pointed out a change in road design would effect the plat. The length of the road, if a cul -de -sac, was also a concern since City Ordinances generally restrict the length to 500 feet. Rick Hartmann, President of Twin View Development, informed the Council that a cul -de -sac design was not feasible since the road would be 1,200 feet long. He noted that this alternative was researched and considered, but the preliminary plat was approved with the proposed road design. He felt it was too late to consider an alternate road design at this time. Harland Lewandowski, 4100 51st Avenue N., stated the residents prefered a cul -de -sac to reduce traffic flow. There was no one else present who wished to speak. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Scott to close the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar tabling the proposed ordinance until proof was provided that Twin View Meadows had been properly filed with Hennepin County. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The City Manager briefly reviewed this item for the Council. The Director of Planning and Inspection provided a summary of the proposed development agreement for Twin View Meadows. He noted that this agreement provides guarantees to insure completion of the project. In response to Councilmember Pedlar's question regarding Joslyn Company contamination, the Director of Planning and Inspection explained this requirement was not incorporated 4/22/91 - 7 - as a condition of approval based on the City Attorney's recommendation. He added that this proposed final plat meets all conditions established by the Council in granting preliminary plat approval. Therefore, a commitment had been made to the developer. The City Attorney agreed the Council does not have much latitude during final approval to change the plat if the applicant had met all conditions of the preliminary plat approval, unless a major or unique situation comes to light that was not considered previously. Mr. Hartmann informed the Council that the closing for this property was scheduled for tomorrow. The City Engineer reviewed the major provisions of the development agreement, elaborating on exhibit 2. He also reviewed the 17 conditions for approval, the modification and other aspects of the plat. The Council briefly discussed the need for emergency vehicle and snow plow access. RECESS The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 8:48 p.m. and reconvened at 9:02 p.m. Councilmember Pedlar questioned the City's ability to restrict residential traffic flow. The City Manager reviewed action taken on Wingard Lane involving both signage and a physical barrier. Councilmember Pedlar indicated he would support restrictive signage. The City Manager indicated doing so would create a major enforcement issue and unrealistic expectations from the residents. He estimated that 90% of the traffic would use France Avenue rather than East Twin Lake Boulevard. The City Attorney noted that the resolution approving the development agreement established conditions that must be met for final plat approval. Therefore, he advised the Council to consider final plat approval before the resolution approving the development agreement. As requested by Councilmember Cohen, the Director of Planning and Inspection provided a detailed recounting of the various meetings and hearings that have been held regarding the Twin View Meadows plat as well as alternative ways of dealing with traffic that had been considered. Councilmember Scott stated in looking at the overall area, she felt residents of East Twin Lake Boulevard will drive through the proposed subdivision to access France Avenue. Mayor Paulson reviewed the issues before the Council regarding one resident requesting additional time to prepare and present an alternate road design incorporating a cul -de -sac and the developer's need to present documentation at the closing of this property scheduled for April 23, 1991. He asked these parties to restate their case. 4/22/91 - 8- Mr. Hartmann expressed his doubt that residents from the proposed subdivision would use East Twin Lake Boulevard for ingress or egress. Rather, he agreed with Councilmember Scott's comment that residents will travel through this area to access France Avenue. He assured the Council that he had researched several cul -de -sac alternatives but found none that were feasible due to excessive length. Mr. Hartmann felt the proposed plat provided the best alternative for the neighborhood. In response to Mayor Paulson's question, Mr. Hartmann reiterated that he had based all of his plans according to preliminary plat conditions and had his employees and surveyors working extended hours to meet the closing deadline. Councilmember Cohen asked if he had hired professional engineers to conduct the traffic study. Mr. Hartmann responded Merrilla and Associates were hired to conduct this study, review traffic options and recommend a road design that least impacted the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed plat reflected their recommendation. Mr. Middlested stated he had attended five meetings regarding this plat and conceded on many other points and he felt there were an undue number of negative comments directed towards him. Residents in this area felt strongly about an alternative road design but it would take time for them to prepare a presentation. Mr. Middlested stated he does not object to a cul -de -sac cutting into Outlot A since it would work well with existing terrain and reduce the traffic flow to East Twin Lake Boulevard. He concluded his remarks by indicating this neighborhood contained many children who were used to walking into the street so he was concerned with increased traffic for their safety as well as the preservation of the unique wildlife in this area. Mayor Paulson expressed his intent to allow all residents the opportunity to be heard and express their concerns. He indicated he had looked at this area and considered both sides of the issue and available options. Councilmember Pedlar stated he accepted Mr. Middlested's remarks but the Council was encumbered with the future development of the City. Also, some people originally opposed to the project have reconsidered and feel the proposed plat was in their best interest rather than some type of I -1 development. Councilmember Pedlar pointed out the enforcement problems with restrictive signage and indicated he supported final plat approval. Councilmember Cohen concurred and noted that preliminary plat approval included conditions based on City Ordinances, Planning Commission data and legal advice. The applicant had now met all requirements of the preliminary plat. Councilmember Cohen explained that while he was sensitive to public opinion, he must consider all aspects of the proposal. Councilmember Scott noted the property owner had a right to develop his property and the City had taken the responsibility of protecting wildlife by keeping two outlots. 4/22/91 - 9- There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar 0 to approve the Twin View Meadows final plat subject to the execution of a comprehensive development agreement. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 91-122 Member Jerry Pedlar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR TWIN VIEW MEADOWS SUBDIVISION AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ITS EXECUTION The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dave Rosene, and the motion passed unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEMS WATER SLIDE The City Manager explained the Park & Recreation Commission had been considering a water slide proposal for the community center. They requested authorization to proceed with an in -house financial investigation to determine the feasibility. The Director of Recreation conducted a slide presentation of the Shoreview water slide and the proposed location for a water slide at the Brooklyn Center community center pool. He noted that it would not interfere with existing activity and felt it would increase attendance and participation. The Director of Recreation informed the Council of discussions he had with directors at other facilities and their success. Councilmember Pedlar, as Park and Recreation Commission liaison, endorsed the concept and suggested a business plan outline including dollar figures be developed. The City Manager agreed that a cost analysis could be included as part of the feasibility study. Councilmember Cohen supported moving forward since the study would be conducted in -house at a minimal cost. Councilmember Rosene voiced his support and indicated he felt residents would also be supportive since an indoor water slide would be unique to this area. Mayor Paulson also supported gathering more data including looking at the financial aspect. There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Cohen to direct staff to conduct an in -house financial investigation including a cost analysis to determine the feasibility of a water slide for the community center. The motion passed unanimously. 4/22/91 - 10- 0 Mayor Paulson suggested, and Council agreed, to consider item 12c, 69th Avenue Improvement at this time in consideration of Short - Elliott- Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) representatives. Council agreed to then consider item 12d, Reforestation Program. 69TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENT STATUS REPORT The City Manager updated the Council on the current status of Stage 1 of the 69th Avenue improvement plans. The Director of Public Works introduced SEH- design engineer Sue Mason and a SEH landscape architect who provided an in -depth presentation of proposed roadway alignment /geometric layout plan, existing landscape and optional landscape treatments to meet individual property owner requests. The City Manager noted differing opinions regarding whether the median should be closed or left open. It was felt this issue would be brought up at the public informational meeting scheduled for May 1, 1991. Councilmember Cohen questioned planting maintenance. The City Manager explained that an irrigation system was not anticipated for the 12' to 19' median planting area. This area would be behind the curb to help eliminate salt kill. The Director of Public Works noted the temporary painted median from June to Brooklyn Boulevard until Hennepin County addressed questions about the Brooklyn Boulevard and 69th Avenue intersection. The City Manager informed the Council of discussions with France and Palmer Lake Drive residents who were interested in a property exchange because of their short backyards. The proposed plans would offer flexibility to consider this option if the Council so decided. He explained that these plans would be presented at the May 1st informational meeting. Ms. Mason noted the need to also work with and inventory existing fences. While lot by lot changes can not be accommodated, the Council may consider several lots together. The Director of Public Works reviewed other issues that would be discussed at the public informational meeting. In response to Councilmember Cohen's question, he explained access to Mound Cemetery would be right in and right out only. Mayor Paulson questioned consideration given to closing roads on the north end of 69th Avenue. The City Manager responded that no specific requests have been received for this or a cul -de -sac design. Mayor Paulson urged the Council to look towards function rather than form and activities that the Council wanted to see in the parkway (walking, picnics). The City Manager stated both the concept of expanded park activities and cul -de -sacs would be reviewed and presented at the May 1st public meeting. Councilmember Scott suggested a unique bus shelter be incorporated to accommodate the heavy bus traffic. Ms. Mason commented they have approached MTC regarding a bus stop at France Avenue and will continue working with them. Mayor Paulson noted the City's policy for not putting a bus shelter in front of residential properties. 4/22/91 - 11 - RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED) The Director of Public Works reviewed the proposed resolution accepting SEH, Inc.'s proposal for 69th Avenue improvements to prepare plans and specifications to construct Phase I improvements. Councilmember Pedlar suggested a "not to exceed figure be included. The Director of Public Works pointed out the figure for Phase I was $28,800. Mayor Paulson expressed his reservation regarding the plan and concern that it was devised without input from the Council on general concept and philosophy. He suggested the Council look at uniform fencing and berming and not miss the opportunity to make this a quality project which maximized potential by putting the "park into the parkway." Mayor Paulson added that this was the last time he will vote on something where the City does not have procurement processes in place. The City Manager explained that four different layouts were previously considered with input gathered on all of them. He added that suggestions by Council would still be considered. Mayor Paulson suggested input on medians and sidewalk location be considered. The City Manager stated these concepts would be presented at the May 1st meeting. Councilmember Cohen commented that a plan had to be developed for presentation to residents on May 1. The Council would again consider the plans after the public informational meeting. Councilmember Scott voiced her concern that a cul -de -sac plan would encroach into the open space. Councilmember Pedlar concurred with Mayor Paulson's statements and indicated residents have contacted him expressing their desire to have the street closed. The City Manager pointed out that residents were invited to the public informational meeting on May 1st and could express their concern at that time. In response to Councilmember Pedlar's question, the Director of Public Works explained that SEH will present updated cost estimates for the entire project before the Council considers proceeding with the next stage. Councilmember Pedlar requested staff provide a commentary of questions and answers for the May 1st meeting and that a sign -up sheet be used. Councilmember Rosene agreed that moving the sidewalks further from the roadway would provide a better parkway atmosphere for the user. Motorists appreciate having a median to separate conflicting traffic so he asked staff not to eliminate them. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -123 Member Phil Cohen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FROM SEH, INC. TO PREPARE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS 4/22/91 - 12- (SOIL CORRECTION IN PALMER LAKE SEGMENT OF 69TH, COMPENSATING STORAGE AND WETLAND MITIGATION) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990- 10 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott and the motion passed unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEMS: CONTROLLING DRIVEWAY WIDTHS AND PAVING IN FRONT YARDS AND YARDS ABUTTING A PUBLIC STREET The City Manager explained the draft ordinance was presented tonight for discussion only and staff had prepared a detailed presentation including 35 slides. There was a motion by Councilmember Rosene and seconded by Councilmember Scott to table further discussion of the proposed draft ordinance controlling driveway widths until the next Council meeting. The motion passed unanimously. REFORESTATION PROGRAM The Director of Public Works reviewed the staff report regarding the implementation of a reforestation program. Staff recommended the Council consider limiting tree replacement to those property owners who lost trees in the 1990 and 1991 diseased tree program. The Public Works Coordinator summarized the proposed reforestation program emphasizing that timing was a critical issue to take advantage of the planting season. During the spring planting season bare root trees can be used but in the fall only balled and burlapped trees can be planted . She recommended the Council consider a limited fall planting program which could be advertised through the newsletter. It was noted that the City currently pays one -half the cost to remove boulevard trees and may want to consider contributing one -half of the cost to replant boulevard trees. Councilmember Scott supported the need for reforestation in Brooklyn Center but had reservation with the program presented by staff which was restricted to only 1990 and 1991 diseased trees. Also, the proposed program would require a lot of staff time to administer. Several different alternatives were discussed involving a City negotiated contract with nurseries, use of coupons which have been authorized by the City, and residents selecting and planting the trees. The Public Works Coordinator pointed out the advantage to staff's proposal was having more control over the planting location of trees. Councilmember Scott noted she does not prefer boulevard trees due to excessive trimming by utility companies and suggested a condition of staff approval on location be considered. Councilmember Cohen expressed his support of a reforestation program. Councilmember Pedlar also expressed support but pointed out that it was too late in the season to 4/22/91 - 13 - consider bare root plantings. He also questioned cost and the possibility of other funding AAk sources that may be available. Councilmember Pedlar pointed out the many areas of need in Brooklyn Center and suggested the Council prioritize where City dollars should be spent. Councilmember Cohen questioned criteria used to recommend replacement of only 1990 and 1991 diseased trees. The Public Works Director responded that they considered how extensive the program can be using existing staff. Also, data was available from a 1990 survey of residents who lost trees and their interest in participating in a reforestation program. Requests from other years could also be considered but this would make it difficult to forecast resources and cost. However, if the program worked well it can be opened to other people in the future. Councilmember Cohen suggested a program where the City accepted bids for trees with or without installation and then pass this price on to interested residents. This would eliminate administrative costs for staff involvement. The residents could present their drivers license to the nursery as proof of residency. Councilmember Scott supported this proposal since it allowed residents the ability to choose the variety and size of tree while also limiting staff involvement. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Pedlar to direct staff to further research a reforestation program for the fall of 1991 involving the City's purchase program with local nurseries and also a spring of 1992 program which can be further discussed during the 1992 Budget sessions. The motion passed unanimously. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE The City Manager updated the Council regarding the tax increment financing and fiscal disparity bills currently being considered by the Senate and House. Councilmember Cohen distributed additional information regarding fiscal disparities within Brooklyn Center as well as dollars used by the social services and corrections programs. He stated he would prefer the State indicate they need a tax increase (if that was the case) rather than trying to use "back door" tactics. RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED) RESOLUTION NO. 91 -124 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1991 GENERAL FUND BUDGET FOR AN EXTERIOR DOOR FOR CITY HALL The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Jerry Pedlar, and the motion passed unanimously. 4/22/91 - 14- The City Manager informed the Council that an agreement had been reached with the property owner of the northeast corner of 69th Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard. The Public Works Director explained the negotiating process that had taken place regarding ineligibility for relocation costs since the property owner was moving into an apartment rather than a house. After further consideration Evergreen Land Services recommended approval of a purchase agreement $3,000 over the City's offer. Staff also recommended approval since this was the last residential property needed for the reconstruction of 69th Avenue and additional legal and condemnation costs would otherwise be incurred. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -125 Member Jerry Pedlar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR 69TH AVENUE RIGHT -OF -WAY, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1990 -10 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager noted that the proposed resolution moved the responsibility of the weed inspection program from the City Manager's office to Public Works and Engineering. It also included a special assessment fee of $30 per parcel and $10 capitalized interest. The Public Works Director further researched the proposed fee schedule. The reappointment of the Weed Inspector would be registered with Hennepin County. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -126 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES RELATING TO WEED INSPECTION/REMOVAL PROGRAM The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dave Rosene, and the motion passed unanimously. The Council briefly discussed the need for a balanced cross - section representation on the Budget Task Force. There was a motion by Councilmember Cohen and seconded by Councilmember Scott to appoint the following people to the Brooklyn Center Budget Task Force: Pat Boran, Donn Escher, Ulyssess Boyd, Vi Kanatz, Ron Christensen, Greg Peppin and Dennis Kelly. The motion passed unanimously. 4/22/91 - 15 - ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Pedlar and seconded by Councilmember Rosene to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 11:54 p.m. Deputy City Clerk Mayor Recorded and transcribed by: Carla Wirth Northern Counties Secretarial Service 4/22/91 - 16 - CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Comcil Meeting Date 5 -13-91 • Agenda Item Numbcr REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING PUBLIC NUISANCES DEPT. APPROVAL: Ger yn R. Barone, Personnel Coordinator MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOMMIENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) The City recently received a request from Brooklyn Center school district officials to amend the City's nuisance ordinance to address problems dealing with unwanted visitors in school buildings. When such visitors have been charged with trespassing, all cases have been thrown out of the courts based on the existing language of the City's ordinances. The proposed ordinance amendment is based on language in Minneapolis' and Plymouth's codes that the county attorney's office has identified as workable in the court system. City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, Police Chief Jim Lindsay, and Brooklyn Center school district officials have reviewed the attached ordinance amendment and feel it should provide a better vehicle to deal with problems encountered at the schools. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Approve for a first reading an Ordinance Amending Chapter 19 of the City Ordinances Regarding Public Nuisances. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of , 1991 at p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway to consider an amendment to Chapter 19 regarding public nuisances and petty offenses. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING PUBLIC NUISANCES AND PETTY OFFENSES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 19 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Section 19 -217. CONDUCT IN OR NEAR SCHOOL BUILDINGS OR GROUNDS. Subdivision 1. DEFINITIONS. As used in this section, the following terms shall mean: a. "Public school" shall be any school building, school grounds, play area, parking lot or athletic field owned or leased by a public school district. b. "School official" shall be the principal, assistant or associate principal, school security person, any schoolteacher, or the principal's designee. Subdivision 2. PROHIBITION. No person shall trespass in or upon any public school by remaining upon said school Premises after being ordered to leave the public school by a school official. Subdivision 3. _PERMISSION REQUIRED FOR RE- ENTRY. No Person, having been ordered by a school official to leave a public school and having left said premises shall re- enter said public school without the written permission of the school principal or the school official who gave the order to leave the public school Subdivision 4. DEFACEMENT OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS. No person shall mark with ink paint chalk or other substance, or post hand bills on, or in any other manner deface or injure fences trees lawns or fixtures appurtenant to or located on the public school or post hand bills on such fences trees or fixtures No signs ORDINANCE NO. shall be placed or posted anywhere on a public school without the express permission of a school official. Subdivision 5. BREACH OF PEACE ON SCHOOL GROUNDS. No person shall make or assist in making any noise, disturbance, diversion or activity by which peace, quiet and good order of the public school are disturbed. Subdivision 6. FIGHTING AND BRAWLING ON SCHOOL GROUNDS. No person shall engage in, threaten to engage in, or assist in engaging in any riot, fight, brawl, tumultuous conduct or act of violence in a public school. Subdivision 7. OPERATION OF VEHICLES. No person shall operate or be in actual Physical control of any motor vehicle in or upon any public school premises, except for the purpose of using designated parking areas for parking in connection with a school or school sanctioned function. The parking areas shall be as designated and appropriately marked by the principal of each school. Section 19 -1805. PENALTY. Any person found quilty by a lawful authority of violating any provision of this chapter of the ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine of not more than $700 and by imprisonment for not longer than 90 days or both, together with the costs of prosecution. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of , 1991. Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 13th day of May , at 7:15 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment to Chapter 3 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CHARTER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 3.01 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter is hereby amended as follows: Section 3.01. COUNCIL MEETINGS. [On the first business day of January following a regular municipal election, the Council shall meet at the usual place and time for the holding of Council meetings.] The City Council shall hold regular meetings at such time and place as it by motion shall determine Officers elected at the time of a regular municipal election provided for by this charter shall be sworn in and assume the duties of the office to which they were elected on or after the first business day of January, or at the first City Council meeting in January, or as soon thereafter as practical Officers elected at a special election shall be sworn in and assume the duties of office to which they were elected on any business day or at any City Council meeting after the issuance by the City Clerk of the Clerk's certificate of election. [At this time, the newly elected members of the Council shall assume their duties.] Newly appointed Council members shall take the oath of office and assume the duties of office upon appointment or on any business day, or at any Council meeting after being appointed [Thereafter, the Council shall meet at such times each month as may be prescribed by ordinance or resolution.] The Mayor or any two members of the Council may call special meetings of the Council upon at least twenty -four (24) hours' written notice to each member of the Council. Such notice shall be delivered personally to each member or shall be left at the member's [his] usual place of residence with some responsible person. All meetings of the Council shall be in compliance with the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, and any records thereof shall be made available at all reasonable times. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after publication and ninety (90) days following its adoption. ORDINANCE NO. Adopted this day of 1991. Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted; underline indicates new matter.) CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 5/13191 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION • NNiiNiF iF 1F ItMiNNNNNMNiNNNNNNNNiiNNNNiNMNiiNNNNNiNiNNNiiNNiNNNNiiiNNNNNNNiNNNiiNNNiiiNNii ITEM DESCRIPTION: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of the City Ordinances Relating to Recycling Services For Multifamily Dwellings NNN NNMNiF!► iFNNNNNiNNNNNiiNNNNNiNNNNiMNNNiNMMNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNiiiNNNNNNNNNNNNNNiNNNNiiii DEPT. APPROVAL: Assistant EDA Coordinator Signature - title M 1F iFlFNiFlF IFNiFiiFNNiiiNNNNNNiiNNNNNiiNNNNiiiNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNiFNNiN N iN iiNNiiiNiNNiiiii .. MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached MM'1FMiFlF 1F iFNNlFMNNiFNiiNNNNNNNNNiiiNNNNNiiiNNNNNNNi NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNiN SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached No ) ® This Ordinance amending Chapter 7, the City's Health, Garbage and Sanitation Code, provides that recycling services must be provided to residents by owners of multifamily dwellings with more than eight units. Adoption of this Ordinance amendment by Hennepin County cities is required pursuant to a Resolution of the County Board. The Ordinance was approved for a first reading on April 8, 1991. The Ordinance language, which was approved for first reading, excluded the option for the apartment owners to bring recyclables collected from their tenants to recycling drop -off centers. Hennepin County policy states that apartment owners should be allowed to either contract for recycling collection services or take the materials collected from their tenants to a certified recycling center themselves. The language of this revised Ordinance Amendment will allow apartment owners to either contract for recycling collection services or provide the services themselves. Owners of smaller apartment buildings may find the most cost - effective method of recycling is to take the materials to recycling drop -off centers. The language contained in the Ordinance approved for first reading is shown below. This language is being replaced by the attached Ordinance Amendment. Section 7 -113. MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS. Subdivision 1 Recycling Services Owners of multifamily dwellings containina more than eight dwelling units must contract with a hauler licensed under the provision of Section 7 -103 of the Brooklyn Center Ordinances to Drovide recycling collection services to all residents of the dwelling The recycling collection services Drovided under this subsection must meet the requirements of aoDlicable county ordinances Subdivision 2. Definitions For Durposes of this subsection the term "multifamily dwellina" has the meaning aiven in the Brooklyn Center Zonina Ordinance • Subdivision 3. Penalty. A violation of this section is a misdemeanor. Subdivision 3. Penalty. A violation of this section is a misdemeanor. RECOMMENDATIONS • Staff is recommending approval of the attached Ordinance Amendment for a second reading. The City's procedure on adoption of ordinances allows amendments to be made at the time of the second reading and requires publication of any amendments. • • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER / Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 13th day of May, 1991. , at 7:15 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway to consider an amendment to Chapter 7 regarding recycling services. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES RELATING TO RECYCLING SERVICES FAMILY D ER FOR MULTI WELLINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 7 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended by adding a subsection to read as follows: Section 7 -113. MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS. Subdivision 1. Recycling Services. Owners of multifamily dwellings containing more than eight dwelling units must provide recycling collection services to all residents of the dwelling The recycling collection services provided under this subsection must meet the requirements of applicable county ordinances. Subdivision 2. Definitions. For purposes of this subsection, the term "multifamily dwelling" has the meaning given in the Brooklyn Center Zoning Ordinance. Subdivision 3. Penalty. A violation of this section is a misdemeanor. Section 2. Effective This ordinance shall be effective as of July 1, 1991. Adopted this day of 1991. Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 5 -13 -91 Agenda Item Number d ® REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING PERSONNEL I DEPT. APPROVAL: I Geral . Barone, Personnel Coordinator MANAGER S REVIEW/RECOMII4ENDATION. � ar • V No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUAEVIARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) Attached for a second reading is an ordinance amending chapter 17 of the City ordinances regarding personnel which grants but limits the city manager's authority to make exceptions to authorizing vacation and sick leave benefits to certain newly hired employees. The reason for allowing the city manager to have the ability to grant exceptions to the established vacation and sick leave schedules is that when the issue of these leaves becomes a critical factor in hiring an employee, the need to wait for city council approval can put the whole selection process "on hold" for up to three weeks. This time period can be especially critical when there is a great deal of competition from other employers for experienced personnel (e.g., police officers). The amendment was approved for a first reading by the city council on April 8, 1991. REQUESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION Approve for a second reading an Ordinance Amending Chapter 17 Regarding Personnel. r CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 13th day of May , 1991 at 7:15 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway to consider an amendment to Chapter 17 regarding personnel. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING PERSONNEL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 17 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Section 17 -111. VACATION LEAVE. 1. Amount. Permanent employees shall earn vacation leave at the rate of 6.67 hours for each calendar month of full - time service or major fraction thereof. Permanent employees with five consecutive years of service through ten consecutive years of service shall earn vacation leave at the rate of 120 hours per year. Permanent employees with more than ten consecutive years of service shall earn vacation leave according to the following schedule: During 11th year of service 128 hours per year. During 12th year of service 136 hours per year. During 13th year of service 144 hours per year. During 14th year of service 152 hours per year During 15th year of service and during each year of service thereafter 160 hours per year. In the best interests of the city, vacation leave in excess of the established amount specified in this section may be granted by the City Manager to newly hired employees who have a minimum of five years of job experience which is directly related to the position for which they are hired. The City Manager may grant a newly hired employee no more than 120 hours of vacation leave per year during the employee's first five years of service with the city. s ORDINANCE NO. Employees using earned vacation leave or sick leave shall be considered to be working for the purpose of accumulating additional vacation leave. Section 17 -112. SICK LEAVE. 1. Eligibility. Sick leave with pay shall be granted to probationary and permanent employees at the rate of eight hours for each calendar month of full -time service or major fraction thereof. In the best interests of the city, an advance of a maximum of 96 hours of sick leave which must be earned before additional hours accumulate may be granted by the City Manager to newly hired employees who have a minimum of five years of job experience which is directly related to the position for which they are hired. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of , 1991. Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 5 -13 -91 • Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING ANIMALS DEPT. APPROVAL: Geralyn R. Barone, Personnel Coordinator MANAGER'S REVIEW/RECOAMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached s SUNEM ARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) Attached for a second reading is an ordinance amendment that was prepared in response to the city council's concern about the process used for approving kennel licenses. The amendment continues to require that all commercial kennel licenses be approved by the city council. With regard to private kennel licenses, however, the city manager would be given the authority to approve these. Owners would have an opportunity to appeal the city manager's action to the city council. The city council would retain the ability to revoke both commercial and private kennel licenses. The amendment was approved for a first reading by the city council on April 22, 1991. RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Approve for a second reading An Ordinance Amending Chapter 1 of the City Ordinances Regarding Animals. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of , 19 , at p.m. at City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment to Chapter 1 regarding animals. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please notify the personnel coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING ANIMALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 1 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Section 1 -105. APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND ISSUANCE OF LICENSES. 4. Application for (Private Kennel License orl Commercial Kennel License. a. Initial application for [a private kennel license or] a commercial kennel license shall be made to the City Clerk. The application shall state the name and address of the applicant, the property address or legal description of the proposed kennel location, a sketch or drawing of the proposed kennel describing construction, operation, and the approximate number of animals to be confined therein, together with their age, breed, and sex, and together with the applicable license fee. b. [5.1 Hearing Required. A commercial kennel license application shall be referred to the Public Health Sanitarian who shall review the kennel design and operation and make a recommendation to the City Council on the adequacy thereof. Applications for [private kennel license and] commercial kennel license shall be placed on the agenda of the City Council for a public hearing at the regular City Council meeting next following 14 days after the application is received. Not less than seven (7) days before the date of the public hearing, the City Clerk shall mail notice of the hearing to the applicant and to the owners of property within 150 feet of the proposed kennel location. The failure of any owner to receive such notice shall not invalidate the proceedings. c. [6.] Council Approval. The City Council may approve the [private kennel license or] commercial kennel license and may attach to such approval any conditions necessary to insure compliance with this ordinance, with Chapter 19 of City Ordinances, and any other condition necessary to protect the health, safety, welfare, and property values in the immediate area. The City Council may deny [a private kennel license or] a commercial kennel license upon finding that the establishment of the kennel would constitute a public nuisance, or would adversely affect the health, safety, welfare or property values of the person residing, living, or owning property within the immediate area. The form of approval for a license shall be the resolution of approval, a certified copy of which shall be forwarded to the applicant. d. [7.] Renewal of License. A copy of the [private kennel license or] commercial kennel license shall be forwarded to .the [Director of Planning and Inspection] City Clerk who shall maintain a register of kennel licenses. Subject to any time limitation set by the City Council, the license shall be valid for a period of one year and until October 1 of the then current calendar year and shall be renewable on October 1 of each year thereafter by the City Clerk upon payment of a renewal license fee set forth by City Council resolution, only in the event no complaint regarding the kennel's operation has been received during the license year. In the event that no revocation of the license is made or contemplated by the City Council, the license shall be renewable as set forth in this subdivision. e. [8.] License Revocation. In the event a complaint has been received by City officials, a report thereof shall be made to the City Council by the [Director of Planning and Inspection] City Clerk and the City Council may direct the applicant to appear to show cause why the license should not be revoked. A license may be revoked for violation of this ordinance, Chapter 19 of the Brooklyn Center Ordinances, or any condition imposed at the time of issuance. 5. Application for Private Kennel License. a. Initial application for a private kennel license shall be made to the City Clerk. The application shall state the name and address of the applicant, the property address or legal description of the proposed kennel location, a sketch or drawing of the proposed kennel describing construction, operation, and the approximate number of animals to be confined therein, together with their age, breed, and sex. Proof of current rabies vaccination and City dog license for each animal and the _applicable license fee must accompany the application. Not less than seven (7) days after receipt of the application for a private kennel license, the City Clerk shall mail notice of the license application to the owners of property within 150 feet of the proposed kennel location. The failure of any owner to receive such notice shall not invalidate the proceedings. b. Consideration Process. A private kennel license application shall be referred to the Public Health Sanitarian who shall review the kennel design and operation and make a recommendation to the City Manager on the adequacy thereof. Within fourteen 1 ) days after the notice of application is mailed to area property owners. the City Manager or the City Manager's designee shall review the Public Health Sanitarian's report, consider written comments by the applicant and any other affected persons, and either approve or deny the application. Within fourteen (14) days after the notice of the City Manager's decision is mailed to area property owners, the owner or any other affected person then may request a hearing before the City Council to show cause why the decision should be changed. A written request for the hearing must be received by the City Manager within such fourteen (14) days. Following the public hearing, the City Council shall render a final decision reversing, affirming, or amending the decision of the CitX Manager. C. Standards for Approval. The City Manager may approve the private kennel license and may attach to such approval any conditions necessary to insure compliance with this ordinance, with Chapter 19 of the City _Ordinances, and any other condition necessary protect the health, safety, welfare, and property values in the immediate area. The City Manager may deny a Private kennel license upon finding that the establishment of the kennel would constitute a public nuisance or would adversely affect the health, safety, welfare or property values of the person residing, living, or owning property within the immediate area. The form of approval for a license shall be a memorandum of approval from the City Manager outlining any conditions necessary to insure compliance. d. Renewal of License. A copy of the private kennel license shall be forwarded to the City Clerk who shall maintain a register of kennel licenses. Subject to any time limitation set by the City Manager, the license shall be valid for a period of one year and until October 1 of the then current calendar year and shall be renewable on October 1 of each year thereafter by the City Clerk upon payment of a renewal license fee set forth by City Council resolution, only in the event no complaint regarding the kennel's operation has been received during the license year. In the event that no revocation of the license is made or contemplated by the City Manager, the license shall be renewable as set forth in this subdivision. e. License Revocation. In the event a complaint has been received by City officials, a report thereof shall be made to the City Council by the City Clerk and the City Council may direct the applicant to appear to show cause why the license should not be revoked. A license may be revoked for violation of this ordinance. Chapter 19 of the Brooklyn Center Ordinances, or any condition imposed at the time of issuance. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication Adopted this day of , Mayor ATTEST: Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 22nd day of April 1991 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding the zoning classification of certain land. _ Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Section 35 -1210. GENERAL INDUSTRY DISTRICT (I -2). The following properties are hereby established as being within the (I- 2) General Industry District zoning classification: _ That part of Government Lot 2, Section 10, bounded by the following: [the north line of Government Lot 2 on the north] the south line of Block 2 Twin View Meadows on the north; France Avenue on the east; the northerly right -of -way line of the Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railroad on the south; [a straight line extension of a line drawn 615 west of the east line of Tract Registered Land Survey No. 235] Outlot B, Twin View Meadows, on the west. Outlot B, Twin View Meadows. Section 35 -1220. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DISTRICT (0 -1). The following properties are hereby established as being within the (0 -1) Public Open Space District zoning classification: Outlot A, Twin View Meadows. Section 35 -1240. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD). The following properties are hereby established as being within a (PUD) Planned Unit Development District zoning classification: 1. The following properties are designated as PUD /R1 (Planned Unit Development /One Family Residential): ORDINANCE NO. Lots 1 through 12 Block 1, and Lots 1 through 13 Block 2, Twin View Meadows. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective upon adoption and thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of , 1991. Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) i I _ CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date S,L13f91 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA) DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, TOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) • The 1986 Safe Water Drinking Act (SDWA) required the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to promulgate rules regulating the quality of drinking water delivered by the water industry to residential and commercial customers. Some required rules have been published in their final form; other rules are still in the proposed or comment stage. The attached memorandum from Public Works Coordinator Diane Spector provides an update on the rules and estimates the impact of those rules on Brooklyn Center. The Council on August 28, 1989 received a similar report. At that time, we were very concerned, along with many other water utilities, about the proposed lead and copper rule, which would have made utilities responsible for water quality to the consumer's tap. The proposed rule established not -to- exceed levels for lead and copper, and required utilities to conduct regular sampling from consumers' taps. If more than 10 percent of the samples exceed the maximum level, then the utility would be required to begin or expand upon various methods of treatment. The American Water Works Association (AWWA), of which Brooklyn Center is a member, joined other professional associations in lobbying against the rules as proposed. At the August 28, 1989 meeting, the Council approved a $1,000 donation to the AWWA's Water Industry Technical Fund. This fund is used to fund research and action in the development of drinking water regulations, and was used to fund lobbying efforts to change the lead and copper rule as originally proposed. Very recently the EPA Administrator William K. Reilly announced that in response to ® widespread reaction to the proposed lead and copper regulations the agency will back off its original proposed rule. He has announced that the proposed final lead and copper rule would only affect "high risk" homes and businesses. The final rule also authorizes states to determine appropriate responses should water testing show utilities exceeding "faction levels" for lead or copper. The final rule is expected to be published later this year. Prior to this recent announcement, the proposed lead and copper rule was the regulation which caused us the most concern, and which could potentially have the greatest financial impact on the water utility. The proposed final rule, as announced, is one that we could "live with." Council Action Required Review the attached report, comment . r CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 BROOKLYN TELEPHONE: 569 -3300 C ENTER F ax: 569 -3494 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 May 10, 1991 TO: Sy Knapp FROM: Diane Spector6m�` SUBJ: Safe Drinking Water Act UPDATE Probable Impacts and Costs to Brooklyn Center Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Regulations SUMMARY The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) required the Environmental Protection Agency to promulgate rules in a number of areas impacting water utilities. Some rules are still in the commenting stage, while others have been finalized. This memo summarizes the rules and requirements, and estimates the impact on the Brooklyn Center water utility. The greatest impact could result from the Lead and Copper Rule, which may include corrosion control standards. The final form of this rule is much less restrictive and burdensome to utilities than as originally proposed. The rule stipulates that if lead and copper standards are not met, then the utility is required to take certain actions. For Brooklyn Center, if the standards are not met the best case is that those actions would be simply to provide more of the corrosion control already provided. The worst case is that the utility would be required to construct a lime softening treatment plant, at an estimated cost of at least $15 million. Initial tests suggest that Brooklyn Center water would meet the proposed lead and copper standards. The amount of lead and copper in the water distribution system is minimal. The water utility will have little difficulty meeting the other standards in the rules as proposed. �sa�AU�ewcncm � 2 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) of 1986 required the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to promulgate rules regulating the quality of drinking water delivered by the water industry to residential and commercial customers. The agency has promulgated rules covering some sections of the Act and is re arin final versions of the other sections. P P g Five areas regulated under the SDWA directly affect the Brooklyn Center water utility: • The Coliforms Rule, relating to testing for the presence of coliform bacteria; • The Radionuclides Rule, relating to the presence of radioactivity; • The Phase II and Phase V Synthetic Organic Chemicals (SOCs) and Inorganic Chemicals (IOCs) Rules, providing standards for acceptable levels of certain chemicals; • The Disinfection Treatment Rule, stipulating methods of disinfection; and • The Lead and Copper rule, stipulating maximum levels of lead and copper in water, and corrosion control treatment The following is a summary of the probable impacts of the SDWA on the City of Brooklyn Center. Coliforms and Radionuclides Rules The Coliform Rule was finalized on December 31, 1990. The Radionuclides Rule is expected to be finalized in December, 1992. Brooklyn Center has historically had no problems with coliforms or radionuclides, and should experience no trouble meeting either the proposed or final regulations. There should be no additional cost impact beyond the current regular sampling that is conducted. One point to note is that the Coliforms Rule does include requirements for more extensive testing and public notification than in the past should the water utility obtain a "bad" sample. Organic and Inorganic Chemicals Rule This rule was published in its final form on January 30, 1991, and will be effective July 30, 1992. This rule establishes maximum allowable levels for a variety of organic and inorganic chemicals which could contaminate drinking water. The EPA will continue to monitor the available research and add new chemicals to the regulatory list as research warrants. Brooklyn Center water does not contain measurable levels of any of the regulated chemicals, nor is it expected that such contamination would occur in the future. It appears that the only impact of this 3 rule on Brooklyn Center will be the increased cost for the additional testing the rules will require. The Minnesota Department of Health will probably take the lead in this area, and will perform the required tests along with the regular testing it performs on municipal water supplies. The Department of Health currently charges Brooklyn Center about $400 per year to conduct these water quality tests, and the City contracts with Twin City Testing or other tests at an annual cost of just under $2,000. i y g � J There is a related national secondary regulations rule which provides guidelines for chemicals which are not a health hazard but which affect the aesthetic quality of drinking water. Brooklyn Center does exceed the recommended level for manganese. It is unlikely that the EPA would ever amend the secondary rules to require meeting the manganese standard. If it should, however, water treatment is Brooklyn Center's only alternative. It has been previously estimated that a water treatment plant to remove iron and manganese could cost $6 -8 million. Disinfection Treatment Rule This rule affects utilities obtaining their water from surface sources, and those obtaining water from groundwater sources that are significantly affected by surface water. Brooklyn Center does not fall into these categories, and is not affected by these rules at this time. It is possible that future rules could regulate disinfection treatment for groundwater sources. Lead and Copper Rule The proposed lead and copper rule was recently published in its final form. In response to widespread water industry reaction to the originally proposed rules, the EPA agreed to major revisions to the draft rules for the final rules. Depending on how the rule is to be implemented, there couuld be a significant impact on Brooklyn Center. As originally proposed, this rule would establish not -to- exceed standards for lead and copper at the consumer's tap. The utility would be required to sample "first draw" water from consumers' homes and test for lead and copper. If more than ten percent of the samples exceed the standard, the utility would be required to begin or increase corrosion control. That control would be specified as treating water to obtain a pH level of 8.0 or above. As recently announced by the EPA, the final rules drop those not -to- exceed standards in favor of establishment of so- called "action levels," and authorizes states to determine optimal corrosion control treatment methods. 1. The rule specifies that utilities obtain as many as 100 samples every six months from high -risk homes, and test those samples for lead and copper contamination. 2. If more than ten percent of those samples exceed the established "action level," then the utility would be required to begin or increase its corrosion control. States would have the authority to determine optimal corrosion control treatment methods. 3. If corrosion control is in place and the standards are still exceeded, then the utility may be I� 4 required to monitor raw water and install treatment systems where contamination is caused in part by raw water; begin a program of service -line replacement; and provide public education. Preliminary Test Results Brooklyn Center utility staff do not have enough information about the household plumbing and fixtures in Brooklyn Center to estimate the proportion of households which might be at risk for contamination. The utility recently contracted with a testing firm to obtain baseline samples for lead and copper from several points in the distribution system. These tests were taken: at the well head, from "raw water," before introduction of any chemicals; from homes in each corner of the city; in the West Central area; and in two older homes in the southeast neighborhood. The "action level" for lead under the proposed final rules would be .015 milligrams per liter of water, in no more than 10 percent of all samples. The "action level" for copper would be 1.3 milligrams per liter of water in no more than five percent of all samples. These preliminary, baseline test results indicate that Brooklyn Center's raw water is not a source of lead or copper contamination, nor is the water distribution system. The tests on samples from the older homes were conducted from "first draw" samples, or what is considered to be the "worst case." Both older homes met the lead standard, although the samples showed a higher lead level than the water being delivered to the homes. One older home showed an elevated level of copper. PRELIMINARY LEAD AND COPPER TEST RESULTS Lead (mg /L) Copper (mg /L) LOCATION (Standard = .015) (Standard= 1. 3) WATER SYSTEM: Well #4 <.002 < .02 Well #6 <.002 < .02 Hydrant, SW Corner <.002 < .02 HOMES: Southeast .002 .02 Westcentral #1 < .002 .04 Westcentral #2 < .002 < .02 South <.002 < .02 Northeast <.002 <.02 FIRST DRAW: Southeast #1 .002 1.6 Southeas # .006 1.0 NOTE: < means "not detected at this level" 5 These tests results, while very preliminary, are encouraging. It is likely that when sampling is expanded to the number and frequency required by the regulations, that some samples will exceed the action levels. It is not possible to predict if the number of these samples will exceed ten percent of the total. However, it does seem unlikely that Brooklyn Center would be required to treat raw water for lead or copper. Sources of Lead and Copper Contamination Lead contaminates water primarily from three sources: the water main and services, household plumbing, and fixtures. The Brooklyn Center water distribution system contains no lead water main. Utility staff are not aware of any lead services in the city. Household plumbing generally consists of copper, galvanized steel, plastic pipe, or some combination of these materials. Until recently, copper pipe was commonly joined using a lead -based solder. This solder is a significant source of lead in water. Galvanized steel pipe coating may be a source of some lead contamination. Plastic pipe manufactures in the US may not contain lead; however, some foreign -made plastic pipe may contain some lead. Most household faucets are made of brass and coated with chrome. Until the 1986 SDWA lead ban, brass faucets could contain 3 -8 percent lead. Lead and copper contamination usually occurs when water comes in contact with lead or copper, and the water slowly dissolves the metal. High risk homes are homes with lead service lines or fittings (often older homes) and newer homes constructed just prior to the lead solder ban. Brooklyn Center currently treats its water with zinc orthophosphate, which coats the interiors of pipes and reduces the amount of direct contact. Corrosion Control In previous versions of the rules, corrosive water was defined as water at a pH level lower than 8.0. Brooklyn Center's water averages about 7.0. The impact on Brooklyn Center of meeting such a pH standard could be significant. The pH of water, or its acidity, has a direct relationship with its potential lead level. At pH levels above 8.0, lead becomes increasing less soluble in water. Even more important, at higher pH levels naturally occurring minerals in the water precipitate and form a scale on the walls of pipes and mains. This scale acts as a barrier, preventing the water from coming in direct contact with lead, and reducing the possibility of contamination. Unfortunately, scaling also introduces significant new problems. Scale builds up in water mains, requiring expensive, continuing maintenance to keep them open. This scale also builds up in service lines and household plumbing. Excessive scaling can ruin household water softeners. The final rules allow states to determine the optimal corrosion control method. There are two ways Brooklyn Center could treat water to meet this corrosivity standard. The first, and preferred, method would be to increase the amount of zinc orthophosphate added to the water. This type of treatment would roughly double annual expenditures for zinc orthophosphate. 1990 expenditures for this chemical were $ 41,820. This treatment would provide additional "filming" of the interior of the pipes and services, further reducing the possibility of direct contact with lead or copper. The 6 increased amount of chemical added would not increase zinc levels appreciably. Zinc is a "secondary" standard, or a contaminant which is not a health hazard but which might have aesthetic considerations. An alternative treatment would require a lime softening treatment plant to both increase the pH and to remove minerals which cause scaling. The estimated cost of such a plant is at least $15 million. - Several cities in the metro area have constructed such plants. Constructing and operating this facility would meet the requirements of the rule and also provide iron and manganese removal, but would triple or quadruple water rates. SUMMARY At a minimum, an impact of the SDWA is the need to provide additional information to the public. As these rules are published and publicized, Brooklyn Center residents will question the safety and quality of their water. it will be important to provide assurances that Brooklyn Center is in compliance with the regulations. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date Agenda Item Numbe REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: EVERGREEN PARK. SCHOOL PLAYGROUND PROJECT DEPT. APPROV L: h l - 1� Director of Recreation Signature - title MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Here is an update on the Evergreen Park School Playground Project. I met with Ken Berg, principal of Evergreen Park School on April 24 to get an update on the playground project. Mr Berg reported that everything was proceeding in a timely manner. He further reported that school district 11 (Anoka - Hennepin) was preparing to put out for bids on the project in the very near future and that the time table mentioned in the letter to the City Manager was very realistic. (A copy of this letter is enclosed). He did mention one change in their plans and that was to use sand instead of pea rock which our department highly agrees with. I think this is the way to go with two units of local government co- operating to provide the students of Evergreen Park School with a new playground which is definitely needed but also providing a new playground for the citizens of Brooklyn Center. I would like to recommend that the city appropriate $15,000 for this project. �dCG3C�G3C���1 PG�1G3a C��C�C��4G�1G3�1 �6a00d KEN BERG, PRINCIPAL 7020 DUPONT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 (612) 561 -0270 Thursday, March 28, 1991 MEMO TO: Gerry Splinter Brooklyn Center City Manager FROM: Ken Berg Principal DATE: March 27, 1991 RE: Playground Project Gerry, this memo is to follow -up on our meeting of Thursday, March 14, 1991. 1 was very pleased with the discussion that took place and the cooperative atmosphere that exists between the City and our school The following is information that we agreed on: Phase I - 1991 The school district will be responsible to: 1 . remove all existing playground equipment including that which is below ground. - District Grounds Crew 2. bid the new playground equipment system. 3. install wooden border around play area. - District Grounds Crew 4. install the new playground equipment system with parent volunteers under the supervision of the company. 5. install fitness station course equipment and wooden border. 6. spread the pea rock. The City will be responsible to: 1. provide city equipment and personnel to haul pea rock at no cost. 2. provide city equipment and personnel to overlay our existing playground blacktop including the hauling of bituminous at no cost. 3. remove our basketball standard and install the city basketball standards in their place if deemed necessary. Project Budget Fund from Evergreen Park P.T.O. $10,000 Funds from Anoka - Hennepin District 11 20,000 Funds from City of Brooklyn Center 15,000 Funds from Brooklyn Center Lions club 2,000 Total Funds 47,000 Playground 1 Estimated Project Costs New playground equipment system $36,000 Fitness station course equipment 4,000 Bituminous for blacktop overlay 885 Pea rock ( 5.50 /ton) 2,000 Wooden timbers for border 1,720 (100'x100 ") (25'x50') 1,100 lineal feet two high 8' = $12.49 Total Estimated Cost $44,605 Project Time Lines Removal of present playground equipment June 1991 Blacktop overlay June 1991 Installation of new equipment and old June 1991 equipment Installation of border August 1991 Pea rock August 1991 Phase II - 1992 Running Track $9,000 10' wide, bituminous surface, 1,320 lineal feet If you see anything that is not according to our discussion, as you see it, please let me know. Playground 2 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 5/13/91 Agenda Item Number It REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Discussion Item - Controlling Driveway Widths and Paving in Front Yards and Yards Abutting a Public Street * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: M Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) • On the May 13, 1991 City Council agenda is a discussion item related to controlling driveway widths and paving in front yards and yards abutting a public street. This item was also the subject matter of a City Council discussion on February 25, 1991. We have been struggling with various ideas on how to best control and regulate the parking and storage of vehicles in front yards and yards abutting public streets. Attached are copies of the February 25, 1991 Request for Council Consideration, a January 16, 1991 memo relating to a yard coverage ordinance and a listing of other communities' residential paving limitations which were all presented to the City Council for consideration on February 25, 1991. Also attached is a draft ordinance that the staff has prepared and has discussed that attempts to address some of the concerns raised. This ordinance would amend Section 19 -103 of the City ordinances relating to nuisances involving the parking and storage of vehicles on occupied residentially used property by deleting the provision that allows authorized driveways and paved or graveled extensions of these driveways to be up to 500 of the front yard or yard area abutting a public street. Instead, this section would require that all driveways and extensions of driveways now comply with limits established in Section 25 -501. SUMMARY EXPLANATION Page 2 Section 25 -501 of the City ordinances deals with the construction of private driveways and sidewalks. This section would be amended to make it clear that it pertains to driveways and sidewalks on private property as well as the boulevard or public portion of the street right -of -way. The proposal would add a subdivision that would limit driveways for single - family and two - family residential dwellings to no more than 24 in width at the curb line and through the boulevard portion of the street right -of -way. Another proposed subdivision would require the following: 1. All driveways for single- family and two - family residential dwellings to be hard surfaced such as concrete, asphalt, or a well compacted gravel. 2. Driveways leading to a garage would not be allowed to exceed the width of that garage. 3. Driveways not leading to a garage would be limited to 12 in width. 4. Paved or graveled expansions of authorized driveways S would be limited to 12 for parking or turnaround areas. 5. The total area for authorized driveways or paved or graveled expansions would be limited to the above dimensions or 50% of the front yard or yard area abutting a public street, whichever is less. The impacts of these proposed provisions will vary. Probably the most significant is requiring a hard - surfaced driveway. We have had discussions regarding the possibility of only requiring hard- surfaced driveways in front yards or yards abutting a public street as this is the area other provisions of the ordinance involving parking and storage of vehicles relate to directly. Enforcement of such provisions is an area that will require City Council direction. It has been suggested that the Council, by resolution, establish a time line for compliance, particularly the requirement for hard- surfaced areas and the restoration of areas that currently exceed the limits established by the ordinance. Restoration of boulevard areas as well as front yards and yards abutting a public street is recommended and may be a hardship for some persons. It has been suggested that a notice giving persons up to say, three years to comply, might be reasonable. We do not recommend at this time considering "grandfathering" situations that don't comply or making the ordinance only effect people putting in driveways or expanding driveways after a certain date. Enforcement of these types of situations would be extremely difficult, and most • of the problems that this ordinance is attempting to address, already exist. Recommendation The "draft" ordinance presented is for discussion only and is not offered for a first reading by the City Council. We will be prepared to discuss this matter in more detail at Monday evening's meeting and to respond to questions and suggestions the City Council may have. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 2/25/9 Agenda hem Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Discussion Item - Controlling Driveway Widths and Paving in Front Yards and Yards Abutting a Public Street DEPT. APPROVAL 4. ct4t-1 4o4J6 b%. Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached On the February 25, 1991 City Council agenda is a discussion item related to the possibility of developing' regulations for residential areas which would attempt to control driveway widths and avin of p g yards abutting public streets. Attached is a copy of a memo to the City Manager regarding concerns with a recently adopted Nuisance Ordinance which might be considered to encourage paving of yards well beyond what the City Council might favor. This ordinance restricts parking in front yards and yards abutting public streets to driveways and paved or graveled extensions of driveways. The ordinance limits this paving or driveway extension to not more than 50% of the yard. Besides possibly encouraging people to pave or utilize too much of their front yards for parking and storing vehicles, trailers, etc., the provision could also be used for allowing excessively wide driveways. For instance, a typical single family- residential lot with a minimum width of 75' could have a driveway opening at the street of 37.5 A corner lot with a depth of 120 could possibly have a 60' wide driveway. As the memo suggests, we believe it would be appropriate to adopt an ordinance provision limiting the width of driveways at the street line or property line to some maximum width such as 24 This would help control one problem. SUMMARY EXPLANATION Driveway Widths and Paving Page 2 However, this leads to other potential problems and concerns relating to other aesthetic and property maintenance matters. Should we consider reducing further the 50% limit on paving in yards abutting streets? There are within the city some 50' and even 40' wide lots. The 50% limit might be restrictive to the smaller lot and may be excessive on the standard size or larger lot. An "eyeball survey" of the city's residential areas will show a wide variety of ways people have paved yards to accommodate parking and turnaround areas in their yards. We seem committed to trying to limit car, snowmobile, recreation vehicle and other authorized vehicle parking to driveways and paved or improved extensions of driveways. But how much becomes too much? Should we consider a maximum amount of paving beyond a normal driveway width and percentage of yard coverage combined? This subject has also lead to other questions and concerns. The engineering department has suggested that if we establish minimum driveway widths on the boulevard portion of the street right -of- way, that perhaps we should establish also a requirement for paved or improved driveway aprons across the boulevard portion of the right -of -way to prevent undermining of the roadway, especially in areas with sidewalks. The City does not require improved driveways on residential lots other than on multiple family residential developments. Should we consider such a requirement for single - family and two - family residential lots? If so, when do we start to enforce such a requirement? General discussion of these subjects by the City Council is encouraged to see if there is interest in pursuing any of the above, or perhaps other suggestions as well. - MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection / /' ;' SUBJECT: Yard Coverage Ordinance DATE: January 16, 1991 As follow -up to our January 2, 1991 meeting, you have requested me to review a City Council raised concern regarding a recently adopted Nuisance Ordinance provision that limited authorized driveways and paved or graveled extensions thereof to not more than 50% of a front yard or a yard area abutting a public street. The City Council was concerned that this provision might lead, or encourage, people to pave or utilize too much of these yards for the purpose of parking and storing vehicles, trailers, recreation vehicles, snowmobiles and other types of vehicles. We had discussed the possibility of limiting driveway widths in residential areas as a means of controlling this problem. I have discussed such a suggestion with Mark Maloney, City Engineer, who is looking at a possible maximum driveway width at a street line. _ He has not as yet suggested such a dimension, but does agree that limiting a driveway width in a residential area would be a positive thing. I suggest that we consider amending Chapter 25 of the City Ordinances which deals with streets and highways, specifically at Section 25 -501 which deals with the construction of private driveways and sidewalks, to add a subdivision c which would allow driveways in.residential areas to be no greater than 24' in width. Mark may wish. to modify this suggested width based on his expertise, and I certainly would have no problem with such a modification. I've also had Gary Shallcross contact a few communities in the area to see if they regulate the amount of yard area which can be paved or hard surfaced or regulate driveway widths. Attached is a copy of the results of his quick survey. I believe restricting driveway widths at the street line would have a positive effect of limiting the amount of hard surfaced area being utilized within a particular yard. The question is whether or not we want to go further in attempting to control this matter. January 9, 1991 RESIDENTIAL PAVING LIMITATIONS CITY LIMITATION Brooklyn Park Maximum width of driveway of 30 Most park on paved surface. At least 5' from property line. Can't expand more than 10' in any direction. No restriction on rear yard. Require permit for driveway, but don't enforce. Crystal Driveway opening 22' maximum (don't rigidly enforce). 50' from intersection; 40' apart; 1 opening per lot. Can't widen driveway to:-rard principal structure. Opening must be at least 3' from side lot line. Enforced on complaint basis. Permit for opening into concrete curb, not into bituminous. Columbia Heights Golden Valley No restrictions on driveway size. No written restriction on driveway openings. Handle on case -by -case basis. They do issue permits for driveway openings. Maple Grove No specific driveway width. Maximum width across boulevard is 24' without Engineering Department approval. Thinks a permit required for driveway opening. New Hope Only one driveway. Must be 5' from property line. 40' from intersection. Maximum driveway curb cut is 24 Concrete driveway must be 5" thick, 6 Class 5 gravel base. Cars must be parked on hard surface. Robbinsdale 22' wide curb opening. No limit on driveway. Engineering Department issues permits on curb cut. St. Louis Park No limit on size of driveways. Can't park on lawn. Driveway must lead to garage or parking _- space. No permit system for driveways. Public Works issues permit for curb opening. 22' maximum width. January 9, 1991 RESIDENTIAL PAVING LIMITATIONS CITY LIMITATION Brooklyn Park Maximum width of driveway of 30'. Most park on paved surface. At least 5' from property line. Can't expand more than 10' in any direction. No restriction on rear yard. Require permit for driveway, but don't enforce. Crystal Driveway opening 22' maximum (don't rigidly enforce). 50' from intersection; 40' apart; 1 opening per lot. Can't widen driveway to: principal structure. Opening must be at least 3' from side lot line. Enforced on complaint basis. Permit for opening into concrete curb, not into bituminous. Columbia Heights Golden Valley No restrictions on driveway size. No written restriction on driveway openings. Handle on case -by -case basis. They do issue permits for driveway openings. Maple Grove No specific driveway width. Maximum width across boulevard is 24' without Engineering Department approval. Thinks a permit required for driveway opening. New Hope Only one driveway. Must be 5' from property line. 40' from intersection. Maxi -um driveway curb cut is 24 Concrete driveway must be 5" thick, 6 Class 5 gravel base. Cars must be parked on hard surface. Robbinsdale 22' wide curb opening. No limit on driveway. Engineering Department issues permits on curb cut. St. Louis Park No limit on size of driveways. Can't park on lawn. Driveway must lead to garage or parking space. No permit system for driveways. Public Works issues permit for curb opening. 22' maximum width. DRAFT CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of , 1991 at p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment to Chapters 19 and 25 of the City Ordinances regarding the construction of private driveways and sidewalks. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the Personnel Coordinator at 569 -3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 19 AND 25 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapters 19, Section 103, Subd. 14 is hereby amended as follows: Section 19 -103. PUBLIC NUISANCES FURTHER DEFINED. It is hereby declared to be a public nuisance to permit, maintain or harbor any of the following: 14. The outside parking and /or storage on occupied residentially used property of usable or nonusable vehicles, trailers, watercraft, snowmobiles, recreational vehicles, all terrain vehicles and similar vehicles, materials, supplies, equipment, ice fish houses, skateboard ramps, or other nonpermanent structures unless they comply with the following: a) Vehicles, trailers and watercraft may be parked or stored outside in any yard provided, 10 however, if they are parked or stored in the front yard area, or a yard area abutting a public street, they must be parked or stored on an authorized arkin or driveway P g Y area or a paved or graveled extension of an authorized parking or driveway area and be in compliance with Section 19 -1301 through 1305 of the City Ordinances. Authorized driveways and paved or graveled extensions thereof may not exceed [500 of the front yard or a yard area abutting a public street] the limits established by Section 25 -501 of the City Ordinances unless approved by the city council as part of a plan approval for an apartment complex pursuant to Section 35 -230 of the City Ordinances. Section 2. Chapter 25, Subd. 501 is hereby amended as follows: CONSTRUCTION OF PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS Section 25 -501. WHEN AUTHORIZED. Property owners are hereby authorized to construct driveways and sidewalks on private Property and on property traversing the boulevard connecting onto the streets owned by the City of Brooklyn Center subject to the following conditions: a. Such construction work must be done at the expense of the property owner and no such construction work shall impair or damage the street. b. The granting of permission by the council for this purpose shall give the owner no right or claim against the City if and when the City shall regrade the streets and shall otherwise improve or maintain said streets so that if following any construction or maintenance work on the streets, the property owner is required to reconstruct the driveway or sidewalk as a consequence thereof, he shall not be entitled to any reimbursement by the City. C. Driveways for single family or two family residential dwellings shall not exceed 24 feet in width at the curb line and through the boulevard Portion of the street right -of -way. d. Driveways for single family and two family residential dwellings shall be of hard surface such as concrete, asphalt, or a well compacted gravel in accordance with Engineering Department specifications. Driveways leading to a garage shall not exceed the width of said garage. Driveways not leading to a garage are limited to 12 feet in width. This section of the ordinance shall not prohibit a paved or graveled expansion of an authorized driveway by twelve feet for vehicle parking or a turnaround area. The total area allowed for authorized driveways and paved or graveled expansions thereof may not exceed the above limits or 500 of the front yard or the yard area abutting a public street, whichever is less. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) Key features of House and senate tax bills Factor House Senate League comments A. Aid cuts: 1. Doc. 1991 aid $25 million, M4paanc • $37.5 million cut, 201 • House provision bette ;aid of base. ?s000. . peraat of nve: �e base.= cuts are lass. e , C:. �Y*� �,.L v g oob 13 , C.1��, CZi ut� • County social services 2. Calendar 1992 aid • No furtba cuts. • S87 milliaa cut, 4SS excluded from base for IIZ of revenue base. = ruts. - 2 5 ,Coo 13 ,C. CA;tJ • All cuts taken 9= fMM LGA. • Both bills leave in= tt,- �„ $30 million "t is caien 1992,15 percent of revenue base. C.c 7 -1 "r G rri. 0 t 1�' a & re- B. Levy limits for 1992, • Three Percent gowth • Present levy limits -- - Senate provisions be Cities over 2,500 except for first class dries, increase of three pe=nt • Home bill severe in == population no population growth factor. Pius population growth, levy allowing Ie ry to replace aid #rowtb for valor of new allowed to replace '92 aid cuts and limit on debt CoCStIUC2ioD.r 1sTa le vy. e vv 64s a Fa r- t *T 2 = • No levy to replace aid �• �� No debt service levy limit. - Bath bills exclude cities !S9 0 LL + Cerf: f: Ist ice} cuts.i+t r9 qz.. uade.• 2 - 4 00 frcm levv 1 Debt service levies frorta an ]ff real of lest' unless included within limit1993. . Shame .f Soul calf, general levy lImI Mastbe approved by refhtodum before May 20, 1991, issued and sold before May-, or binding contracts signed before May 20. C. Dedication of revemc • State sales tax reduced to - No local option feature. • The dedication of reverse for Iocal aids 4 Ill percent - 253 treats of sales tax for local aids in both bids is • Local option two perrrat dedicated to Local aids, good for future stability aid sales tax can be toted by including school district pro %th of city aids. county boards, deTm ed to ' SACA, for calendar ytar • The House pmvisicns local aids, excluding school 1991 aids, 231 cents for should be safer from fu=-. district HACA. calendar ytar 1992 and tampesinp• • Distribution. in 1491 and _ t5aM&ft= 1992 per currant rid amounts. • New distribution fommlas must be adopted by 1992 Legislature for 1993 aids. b. C /t9L 17tz rto A;!• n"Ojivaj bni f,er •tfr.MML& r,ttts. �`e 2.3Ct77t� {1413} �.`t rS4Z - 'CA is •l, i se lix), 2. t7 7S a. Nt7r K.•y• .claw �.t till 2.5 t9Y'/ 3 t99t res�23� • - 2Z t49s, . _. - Ala c!s r id KcT,.°r FRED CORRIGAN E Fecul -e Director •s !ERRY ANDERSON THE MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION Ass! Exec u!— D.re<!or HL Ll Al 1 % L FORMERLY MINNESOTA GOOD ROADS. INC. May 1, 1991 TO: Transportation Industry Associations FROM: Fred J. Corrigan, Executive Director RE: TRANSPORTATION POLICY AND FUNDING LEGISLATION A meeting of transportation industry representatives was held at the State Capitol on April 30th. Senators Gary DeCramer and Keith Langseth and Representative Henry Kalis were present to explain the status of transportation legislation including the Transportation Study Board policy bill and the three funding initiatives currently in committee. The consensus of the meeting was to get out a strong telephone and mail effort to support the policy bill and the need to maintain transportation funding at levels not less than the levels approved in 1989 for the past biennium. I have included information prepared for members of The Minnesota Transportation Alliance outlining a lobbying effort for the final days of the session. A strong effort by all transportation industry people is critical not just for this session, but also to ensure a better reception in future sessions. We are attempting to arrange a meeting with the Governor to discuss these issues and gain his support for a funding package this year. Your organization should also request a meeting with the Governor and the Commissioner as soon as possible. The Governor will need to make a positive statement on the need for supporting the 1989 funding commitment to transportation before we can expect the legislative leadership to respond. Your efforts are critical. Senators DeCramer and Langseth and Representative Kalis have provided the opportunity to pass legislation this year. Let's work closely with them for the balance of the session to support their efforts to bring this legislation to a vote. Enclosure 3402 UNIVERSITY AVENUES. E. MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55114 612.379.7227 THE MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION LF'G S=X2kT =V LERT E .A For Alliance Members fORMERIY MINNESOTA G000 ROADS, INC. MAY 1, 1991 1991 TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PACKAGE IS IN YOUR HANDS Current proposals in the Minnesota Legislature would reduce highway funding by up to 4.1% and transit funding by up to 18.3% for the 1992 -93 biennium. Two funding packages have been introduced in the Senate: a 3 -cent gas tax increase from 20 cents to 23 cents per gallon and extension of the state 6% sales tax to include labor costs of vehicle repairs. The Minnesota House of Representatives has introduced a 10% transfer of MVET. The Senate proposals would each provide over $120 million while the House proposal would result in approximately $20 million for transportation over the biennium. If any of these proposals are to have any chance this year, legislators and legislative leadership must hear from YOU repeatedly over the remaining days of the legislative session. Transportation funding was already cut by $52 million in 1991 and can not absorb any additional reductions in the next biennium. WE MUST TELL LEGISLATORS THAT TRANSPORTATION FUNDING FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION AND TRANSIT MUST NOT BE CUT BELOW THE FUNDING LEVELS APPROVED FOR THE LAST BIENNIUM. The Alliance has supported the recommendations of the Transportation Study Board including a 4 -cent gas tax increase, and a 50% dedication of MVET revenues to transportation. Legislators have all of these options available to them during this session and you must convince them to use one or all of these choices to make up the shortfall in transportation funding levels. 1992 is an election year and legislators may be even more nervous then about passing gas tax increases. Your efforts NOW are critical. Please call and write the Governor and the legislators on the enclosed list today and ask your employees and associates to Join the effort with their own contacts 3402 UNIVERSITY AVENUE. S.E. Fred Corrigan MINNEAPOl15 55414 (61(2) 379 -7227 Executive Oirector TRANSPORTATION FUNDING COMPARISON: FY90 -91 BIENNIUM AND CURRENT FY92 -93 PROPOSALS April 30, 1991 All figures appear in thousands (000's). FY90 -91 GOVERNOR CHANGE: GOV. SENATE CHANGE: SENATE HOUSE CHANGE: HOUSE PURPOSE APPROPRIATION FY92 -93 REC. OVER 90 -91 FY92 -93 REC. OVER 90 -91 FY92 -93 REC. OVER 90 -91 ---- - - - - -- STATE ROAD CONSTRUCTION 853,632 811,400 813,596 826,400 COUNTY STATE AID 479,400 482,000 482,000 482,000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID 155,000 133,000 133,000 133,000 Subtotal 1,488,032 1,426,400 —4.1% 1,428,596 —4.0% 1,441,400 —3.1% TRANSIT —Metro (RTB) 49,846 45,552 45,552 53,547 — Greater MN (Mn/DOT) 16,286 13,686 13,686 15,685 — LRT &Admin. (Mn/DOT) 8,009 1,310 1,310 1,310 Subtotal 74,141 60,548 — 18.3% 60,548 —18.3% 70,542 —4.9% TOTAL 1,562,173 1,486,948 —4.8% 1,489,144 —9,7% 1,511,942 —3.2% THE MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION ALUM" LEGISLATIVE ALEM For Alliance Members LEGISLATIVE CONTACT WORKSHEET TRANSPORTATION FUNDING SUPPORT Members need to contact the following legislative leadership to support transportation funding in this session. The Alliance is recommending the following statement: "Funding for highway construction and maintenance and transit service must not be reduced below the level of appropriation approved for the last biennium. I SUPPORT THE LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES CURRENTLY BEFORE THE LEGISLATURE TO MAKE UP THE LOSS OF WET FUNDING, INCLUDING: • 3 -cent gas tax increase • transfer of MVET revenues to transportation (Members may want to be selective in their choice of one or more of these revenue options. Legislators will ask for recommendations for the source of funding.) Members should call and write to each of the following persons. If the person is not available by phone, leave your name, your phone number, where you are calling from and the reason you are calling (read your prepared remarks to the person answering the call) Governor Arne Carlson Senator Roger Moe 0 130 State Capitol Majority Leader Saint Paul, MN 55155 208 State Capitol 612/296 -3391 Saint Paul, MN 55155 612/296 -2577 Commissioner John Riley MOOT Representative Robert Vanasek 411 Transportation Bldg. Speaker of the House 395 John Ireland Blvd. 463 State Office Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 612/297 -2930 612/296 -4229 Senator Duane Benson Your State Senator: Minority Leader 147 State Office Bldg. Saint Paul, MN 55155 612/296 -3903 Representative Terry Dempsey Your State Representative: Minority Leader 267 State Office Bldg. Saint Paul, MN 55155 612/296 -9303 Don't forget to copy this alert and pass it along to your employees and associates. The Alliance office would be happy to provide you with phone and address information for your local legislators. Your investment of time today will impact the investment in our transportation system tomorrow. 5 =1 -91 League of Minnesota Cities = C t U01le t,n 1 1 1" " 11 S a Number 17 May 3,1991 League urges cities to contact Local salary g cap proposed legislators about tax bills Senator Bill Luther (DFL- Brooklyn The League urges city officials 3. Aid to cities - -The League Center) successfully amended the state to contact their senators and supports the House provisions, which departments appropriations bill on representatives regarding tax provide for additional aid cuts Wednesday, May 1 to freeze for two conference committee action on the beyond current law for all levels of years the salaries of all local govem- following features of the Senate and local government of only $25 ment employees, both supervisory and House omnibus tax bills. See Page 3 million, compared to $125 million in non - supervisory, who are not covered for more detail. the Senate bill. by a collection bargaining agreement. 1. General levy limits- -The 4. Dedication of sales tax League staff have not yet been able League supports the Senate levy revenue to local aids- -The League to communicate our reaction to this limit provisions, which maintain supports the House version because proposal, or to gauge his intent. It is current -law levy limits. The House of its better prospects for future broader, harsher, and has a longer bill restricts levies, especially retention of the dedicated funds for duration than proposals Senator Luther regarding not allowing levies to local aids. has offered regularly during appropria- make up for aid cuts. 5. Discount for pre - payment of lions bill debates the past few years. In 2. Debt service levy limits -- property taxes - -The League opposes every case, the language was deleted in The League supports the Senate this provision of the House bill, conference committee. provision which continues the which would provide a 2 -1/2 percent Our chief concern is that the past exemption of debt service from levy early payment discount. Cities actions may make local government limits. The House bill limits debt would lose more tax revenues than employees lackadaisical in reacting to service levies for cities over 2,500 they would gain on interest earnings. the proposal; to their serious detriment. in several ways. JT Please contact your senator. JJ Full Senate barely passes tax bill t A bill that includes large aid cuts, Prior to floor action, tax commit- The House tax bill was passed on creates a "property tax relief account," tee approval was difficult. With four a vote of 79 to 54 May 1. dedicates a percentage of sales tax, DFL members initially voting against Negotiations on the substantial ' and amends the current levy limit law the bill it could not pass out of the tax differences in the two bills are ex- got the approval of the full Senate committee. After several tense pected to be discussed in conference Thursday, May 2 by a vote of 34 to 33. moments, Senator Chmielewski (DFL- committee beginning the week of May Eleven of the lawmakers voting Sturgeon Lake) changed his vote to the 6. It appears unlikely that the Legisla- against the bill are DFL Senators. affirmative and the bill passed on to ture will meet the governor's request The most substantial change the Senate floor. Senators Frank for a final tax bill by May 10. during floor discussion was an amend- (DFL-Spring Lake Park), Mart DFL- A summa of the provisions P g Y( summary p visions in ment to exclude cities with popula- St. Paul), and Bertram (DFL- Pay - the Senate tax bill follows. SH lions under 500 from the proposed nesville) voted against the bill. In December 1991 and calendar year addition, all of the IR members of the See Senate tax bill, page 4 1992 aid cuts. tax committee voted in the negative. a The Cities Bulletin is a publication of the League of Minnesota Cities . and includes an update of state legis- C ontents lative, administrative, and congres- sional actions that affect _cities. It also includes reviews of metropoli- tan area issues by the Association of 1 / League urges cities to contact legislators about Metropolitan Municipalities. tax bills 1 / Local salary cap proposed League legislative staff members are 1 / Full Senate barely passes tax bill available to answer your questions 3 / Key features of House and Senate tax bills concerning legislation relating to 6 / Update on House tax bill cities. 8 / Governor issues executive order on mandates from state agencies The Bulletin lists League and AMM 8 / Sister Cities International requests information authors of articles and bill summa - 9 / House approves strengthening local election ries by their initials. authority 9 / DOER appoints pay equity advisory committee 10 / Federal update Gayle Brodt - -GB t S1 / Bill Status Tim Busse - -TB B 1 / Bill Summaries Jean Mehle Goad - -JMG Inside Sarah Hackett - -SH back Carla Heyl - -CH cover / Municipal ads Ann Higgins - -AH Joel Jamnik - -JJ Darlyne Lang - -DL Andrea Lubov - -AL Debra Nyberg - -DN Stanley Peskar - -SP Roger Peterson - -RP Barry Ryan- -BR Donald. A. Slater - -DAS Jim Stigman- -JS John Tomlinson - -JT Peter Tritz - -PT League of Minnesota Cities, 183 University Ave. E., St. Paul, MN 55101 (612) 227 -5600 Fax (612) 221 -0986 Page 2 Panted on recycled paper LMC Cities Bulletin Key features of House and Senate tax bills Factor House Senate League comments A. Aid cuts: 1. Dec. 1991 aid • $25 million, 1.14 percent • $37.5 million cut, 2.01 • House provision better, aid of revenue base. percent of revenue base. cuts are less. • County social services 2. Calendar 1992 aid • No further cuts. • $87 million cut, 4.55 excluded from base for all percent of revenue base. cuts. • All cuts taken first from LGA. • Both bills leave intact the $50 million aid cut in calendar 1992, that was passed in 1990, 2.55 percent of revenue base. B. Levy limits for 1992, • Three percent growth • Present levy limits— • Senate provisions better. Cities over 2,500 except for first class cities, increase of three percent • House bill severe in not population no population growth factor, plus population growth, levy allowing levy to replace aid growth for value of new allowed to replace '92 aid cuts and limit on debt construction. cuts. service levy. • No levy to replace aid • No debt service levy limit. • Both bills exclude cities cuts. under 2,500 from levy limits • Debt service levies frozen and keep repeal of levy unless included within limits in 1993. general levy limit. Must be approved by referendum before May 20, 1991, or issued and sold before May 20, or binding contracts signed before May 20. C. Dedication of revenue • State sales tax reduced to • No local option feature. • The dedication of revenue for local aids 41/2 percent. • 2.53 cents of sales tax for local aids in both bills is • Local option two percent dedicated to local aids, good for future stability and sales tax can be voted by including school district growth of city aids. county boards, dedicated to HACA, for calendar year • The House provisions local aids, excluding school 1991 aids, 2.31 cents for should be safer from future district HACA. calendar year 1992 and tampering. • Distribution in 1991 and thereafter. 1992 per current aid amounts. • New distribution formulas must be adopted by 1992 Legislature for 1993 aids. May 3,1991 Printed on recycled paper Page 3 Senate tax bill, continued from page 1 ARTICLE i seasonal residential recreational ARTICLE 3 State budget property to 2.2 percent (currently 2.3 Levy limits The bill would establish a "prop- percent) for taxes payable in 1992, 2.1 The Senate tax bill would provide erty tax relief account" within the percent for taxes payable in 1993, and cities with the same levy limits as they general fund to make the payments of 2.0 percent for taxes payable in 1994 had for taxes payable in 1991. The general property tax relief aids such as and after. SH three percent overall increase and the local government aid (LGA), equaliza- The bill would also make some adjustment for population or house - tion aid, homestead and agricultural changes to the market values of low- hold growth would remain. The bill credit aid (HACA), and disparity income housing. Assessors would would not change the scheduled reduction aid. Funding for this have to determine the market values of complete elimination of all levy limits account would be 42.8 percent of the properties classified as low- income for taxes payable in 1993. state's sales and use tax in fiscal year housing based on restricted rents and The bill would authorize several 1992 and 39 percent thereafter. The standardized expenses. The special special levies; most are for social bill provides that the revenues, and market value only on the portion of the service spending by counties. The bill therefore payments, of the account structure used by low - income, elderly, would provide for a special levy would rise and fall as the revenues or handicapped people with low or available to cities to pay the costs of from its dedicated source fluctuate. moderate incomes. The tax capacity redistricting, the establishment of The Senate bill would adjust the of property qualifying as low- income election precincts, required notice, and size of the state's budget reserve rental housing is currently 2.3 percent the reassignment of voters in the downward - -to $300 million, compared of market value compared to the 3.0 to statewide voter registration system. to the $550 million target in current 3.6 percent rates for property that does The bill would limit this special levy, law. The Senate proposes to use $250 not qualify. outside the overall limited levy, to $2 million of the existing budget reserve. The property manager would have per capita. (Special levy authority SH to demonstrate annually that 70 applies only to cities with populations percent of the tax savings due to the over 2,500.) SH ARTICLE 2 lower market value went to reduce Property taxes rents, improve maintenance, make ARTICLE 4 The Senate plan would reduce the capital improvements, or was placed in Truth in taxation class rate on the homestead third tier capital reserves. If the benefit has not The Senate bill would make (property valued over $110,000) to 2.7 been given to the tenants, the property several clarifications and changes to percent of market value (currently is subject to triple the savings incurred the truth in taxation process. Contra - three percent) for taxes payable in by having a lower market value. dictory requirements in current law 1992. The bill plans for future In addition, property that does not caused a great deal of confusion reductions for this property to 2.4 qualify for a federal low- income concerning the required size of the percent for taxes payable in 1993, and housing credit could qualify as low- newspaper advertisement. The 2.0 percent for taxes payable in 1994 income housing if certain require- Department of Revenue prescribed the and after. ments, including rent and income restrictions and rehabilitation ex ndi- Intent „ of the law last year by Rental residential properties requiring all participating local would also see class rate reductions tures are met. Developers would also governments to publish one - quarter beginning this year. Apartment have to sign an agreement with the page ads. buildings (four or more residential local housing and redevelopment For truth in taxation in calendar housing units) would see a rate reduc- authority to meet the low- income year 1991, this bill clarifies the tion to 3.5 percent of market value requirements for 15 years. requirements for one - quarter page (currently 3.6 percent) for taxes The local housing and redevelop- advertisements and requires that they payable in 1992 and thereafter. ment agency (HRA), or county HRA if be used for all cities with populations Smaller rental residential - iroperties of there is no local HRA, would annually of 2,500 or more. The bill would three units or less would see a rate review records to determine if the require cities with populations less reduction to 2.8 percent for taxes owner or developer was meeting the than 2,500 to publish an ad that is one - payable in 1992 (currently three requirements. The agency would have eighth page in size. (Population for percent), 2.6 percent for taxes payable to report to the assessor who then this distinction would be determined in 1993, and 2.5 percent for taxes determines the classification of the by the same numbers used to deter - payable in 1994 and thereafter. property. If the low- income require- mine applicable levy limits.) In addition, the bill would reduce ments have not been met, an additional The bill would retain parcel - the class rate on non - commercial tax would be imposed. AL specific truth in taxation notices for Page 4 Printed on recycled paper LMC Cities Bulletin Hennepin, Ramsey, and St. Louis would translate into approximately for state grants for cities, counties, and Counties for calendar year 1991, and 2.01 percent of city revenue base. townships to either jointly provide for all other counties beginning in Cities take a slightly larger share of services, or to actually consolidate calendar year 1992. the cut because county social service several governments into one. The The generic mailed truth in levies are excluded from the revenue department of trade and economic taxation notice used last year caused base of county levies when calculating development would review proposals, some confusion among taxpayers their cut. and distribute grants. regarding the actual expected percent For 1992 aid payments, $137 The bill would target at least 40 increase in property taxes. The Senate million would be cut from local aid percent of the funding for "cooperation bill would require that each notice payments - -$51 million is in current and combination" efforts by local show the total percentage increase or law (1990 Legislature), $25.8 million governments to fully consolidate over decrease as an "average percent from cities; an additional $87 million a four -year period. Counties may change." The calculation would be is proposed of which cities lose combine with other counties, cities and weighted in proportion to each taxing another $48.2 million. The total $137 towns may combine with one or more jurisdiction's share of the total levy. cut, of which cities would bear $74 other cities and towns. The incentive Advocates of this calculation million, would result in aid cut funding for this program would have admit that it would not show an amounts of 7.1 percent of city revenue to be repaid if the participating accurate approximatation of the total base. These cuts, like those made governments did not accomplish the tax increase, but claim that it is previously, would be deducted first consolidation within the timeframe. preferable to taxpayers adding up all from local government aid (LGA), Although few barriers appear to of the individually listed estimates of then equalization aid, homestead and be preventing cities from entering into tax burden changes. agricultural credit aid (HACA), and joint powers agreements to share Property parcels where tax disparity reduction aid. BR services, as much as $1.2 million increment or fiscal disparities taxes The bill creates a "nonhomestead could be available to help provide apply would have separate listings on credit relief aid" for cities with an governmental services in ways that the truth in taxation notice. The appropriation of $6 million. This new would either reduce costs or provide proposed tax levy on the value which aid program would be available to a services more efficiently. is captured for TIF or subject to the city if its local tax rate in 1991 was .15 (Other bills introduced this session areawide FD tax rate would be listed or higher. The aid, to reduce city would have required unit or service separately. Currently, these two items levies on nonhomestead and nonagric- consolidation on a non - voluntary are grouped with the aggregate line ultural property, would be calculated basis.) SH item for special districts on the truth in by multiplying the net tax capacity of taxation notice. all nonhomestead and nonagricultural ARTICLE 7 The notice design used in previous property times .12 percent times one Income taxes years included the time and date of a minus the ratio of net tax capacity per Like the House tax bill and the second, continuation hearing. The capita to 900. The calculation would governor's proposal, the Senate bill Senate bill would eliminate this use the class rates and net tax capacity also recommends changes so that the requirement. Instead, in cases where of the year prior to the aid distribution. Minnesota income tax laws comply to discussion is not completed at the fast SH the deduction and withholding hearing, the date, time, and place for December payments of state aid requirements that are now part of continuation of the hearing would be would change from the 15th of the federal taw. This would generate announced. That hearing, if necessary, month to the 31st. The League approximately $82 million over the would need to be at least five business supports this adjustment to help the next biennium. days, but no more than 14 business state's cash flow. SH The Senate bill proposes smaller days after the original hearing. SH increases in the income tax rates, ARTICLE 6 ARTICLE 5 however. Under this bill, the rates Local government service would be six percent, eight percent, Property tax aids sharing and combination and 8.5 percent. SH and credits incentives December 1991 aid payments ARTICLE 8 would be cut by an additional $37.5 The Senate bill includes a new Sales taxes million; $20.8 of this would be taken grant program to help facilitate service A percentage of annual revenues from expected city aid a sharing and consolidation by local Pe y payments. As governments The author is Senator would fund the attempt to dedicate a . with previous cuts, these would be portion of the state sales and excise tax made as a portion of each city's Ember Reichgott (DFL -New Hope). A revenue base. The December aid cut $2 million appropriation would pay See Taxes, page 9 May 3,1991 Printed on recycled paper Page 5 Update on House tax bill Levy limits caps on these LGA deductions so the the state's cash flow needs and the tax 0 On the House floor, an amend- process has oversight by the tax bill's use of the state budget reserve. ment Representative Alan Welle committees. An appropriation of $300,000 (DFL- Willmar) offered would reinstate would go for a newly created "legisla- the overall three percent levy limit Franchise fees five commission for the study of inter - growth to all cities except those of the The bill's effect on franchise fees governmental aid." The funding for first class. Another change would appears to do more harm than ex- this study would be from the new remove the levy limit base increase for pected. Fees which are already in sales -tax funded homestead credit trust increased market value due to new effect are capped at their present rate, fund. construction from all cities except but when the contract on the franchise On the floor, an amendment by cities of the Faust class, is up for negotiation, it looks likely Representative Kris Hasskamp (DFL- that the bill would cap a city at the Crosby) limited the use of the three Three property tax payments new three percent limit. percent lodging tax authority in the During committee discussion, an bill. Now, except for cities in Henne- amendment Representative Bill Other issues pin and Ramsey counties, cities would Schreiber (IR- Brooklyn Park) offered As in the Senate bill, the House need to use the proceeds of this tax, if would require three, rather than two, changes the December aid payment unposed, for tourism purposes. SH property tax payments each year. The date from the 15th to the 31st to help payment dates would be: March 15, July 15, and November 15. Debt changes in House bill The governor recommended this change for several reasons. It would The severe restrictions on cities' subdivision's levy in 1991 under slightly improve the cash flow of local ability to issue debt for cities with section 275.50, subd. 5, clauses (b), governments. The earlier first pay- over 2,500 population that the House (c), (d), and (e) (special debt levies ment may allow cities, counties, and Tax Committee passed were modi- backed by the city's taxing author - townships to maintain lower cash flow fed by the full House on Wednes- ity), less the greater of.• fund balances. In addition, if property day. April 30, 1991. 1. The amount levied under the taxes increase because of cuts to local The new provisions would make comparable special levy authority in aid programs, the impact may be less it possible for cities to issue debt to 1990, or noticeable spread over three payments. finance projects if they made com- 2. The amount levied under the mitments before May 20, 1991. special levy authority in 1991 for LGA deductions for state Debt cities issued after May 20 to qualified bonds. Qualified bonds are agency costs finance projects for which commit - bonds, certificates of indebtedness, meats have not been made before or other debt issued or sold before Representative Ted Winter (DFL- re May 20 will, according to House May 20,1991, approved by the Fulda) moved re cap the amount that language, be subject to a city's voters in an election held before May state agencies receive for program overall levy limit. There are no 20, 1991, or issued to construct costs which are deducted from the similar provisions in the Senate bill, correctional facilities in Washington local government aid (LGA) program. Restrictions of this kind on debt and St. Louis counties, or issued to The amendment would appropriate the levies are unprecedented and the acquire or construct land, improve - same amount they got last year to the reactions of bond rating agencies are ments, materials or equipment if office of the state auditor, the Depart- uncertain. binding contracts were entered into ` Dent Employee Relations, and the The League urges city officials for the acquisition or construction Department of eco rdds ion for the to contact their legislators and before May 20,1991, or issued for local got t records program and inform them of any difficulties these street and related improvements the intergovernmental information provisions create. where the land on which all or part the system (IISAC). Under current law, The language adopted by the of the improvements will be con - payments appropriations bills allow for these House is as follows: structed was acquired by the city p from LGA each year. The For taxes levied in 1991, the after January 1, 1989 and before Lague opposes these deductions as adjusted levy limit base is reduced May 20, 1991 and the expenditures matter of principle, and the Senate by an amount equal to the result of for the acquisition exceeded does not include this provision in their tax bill. Although the House position the following computation: $2,500,000. AL may prevail, it is preferable to include The amount of the governmental Page 6 Printed on recycled paper LMC Cities Bulletin e [)*]*Re Es(CaTeOe ReYo OF MINNESOTA 1!1qE Available in February Price $20* j The Directory contains: • Names of all city officials and department heads in Minnesota • City hall street addresses and zip codes • Designation of Plan A and Plan B cities • Council meeting dates • Telephone numbers of city hall or city clerk, when available • Population estimates from the 1990 federal census • Legislative and congressional districts * Advance payment required. Discounts available for member city officials and state agencies. Mail order form to Finance Department, League of Minnesota Cities, 183 University Ave. E., St. Paul, MN 55101 Order form: 1991 Directory of Minnesota City Officials Name Number Title of copies at $20 Firm/State Department State agencies: 10% discount Address Member cities: 25% discount Subtotal City /State/Zip 6% sales tax Postage and handling Postage and handling If your order is between: $1.00 and $25.00 $1.50 (see chart at left) $25.00 and $50.00 $3.00 $50.00 and $75.00 $4.50 Total enclosed over $75.00 $6.00 Governor issues executive order on mandates from state agencies In April, Governor Ame Carlson the mandates that the agency imposes. The changes from the executive issued an executive order directing The state planning agency will be order are not intended to require state agencies to "immediately responsible for reviewing the plans "administrative or Legislative eliminate any unnecessary mandates from all other agencies. action." This will greatly limit the on local units of government that Carlson said that the Dyrstad changes that can occur and the can be eliminated without legislative Commission on Local and State mandates the order can eliminate. In action." Government Relations motivated this addition, many mandates to Minne- The governor told agencies to executive order. The commission, sota cities which are administrative eliminate or modify "unnecessary or appointed in January, has spent the or revenue restricting, the Legisla- problematic mandates" for which no majority of its time discussing recom- ture institutes, not state agencies. administrative or IegisIative action is mendations for eliminating mandates The League is working with the required. to cities, counties, and townships. Department of Administration to The governor gave state agen- Changes in requirements and funding coordinate input by cities into this cies until November 1, 1991, to of the presidential primary has been mandate review. A study of Minne- identify those mandates which the the only mandate to receive consider- sota Rules (state agency rules and state should change or eliminate -- able attention by the governor's staff. requirements) which the League is either through administrative or Little progress has been made on this doing will be helpful in these legislative action. Each agency will issue in negotiation with the Legisla- discussions. SH prepare plans and timelines for its ture. proposal and a compilation of all of Sister Cities International requests information The Sister Cities International The SCI needs the following state management team will meet at (SCI) is asking cities with sister cities information to update the directory of the LMC office to begin the develop - in other parts of the world to send Minnesota cities: ment of a statewide strategy and effort information about their programs to *Name of city (cities) with which to support and expand the sister cities help update information about Minne- your city has a sister city relation; program in Minnesota. SCI has a sota cities with sister cities programs. *Name, address, phone for the volunteer leadership development Those cities interested in partici- city official or volunteer serving as program to identify priorities for sister pating in the program may also send sister cities coordinator /contact; cities programs for Minnesota cities information and contact the sister *Status of the sister cities program and to develop services and marketing cities management team. The manage- in your city; approaches to strengthen and expand ment team, made up of city officials *Events or plans for sister cities sister cities programs locally. and other volunteers, is supporting and activities in 1991 -92. City officials participating in the strengthening sister cities programs for The League will feature a pro- SCI state management team will also cities in Minnesota. gram on sister cities at the 1991 assist cities to form new sister city Joyce Benson y , formerly member Annual Conference in Rochester. The affiliations ons with cities around the of the Duluth City Council, serves as session, Thursday, June 13 from 2:15- world as well as to increase SCI SCI state coordinator. Benson is 3:30 p.m., will explain how to start a membership in Minnesota. working with the League to provide sister cities program in your city as Please send the information to assistance and information to cities well as to provide tips on fund - raising Joyce Benson, 2223 Catskill Street, already participating in sister cities strategies and benefits of sister cities Duluth, MN 55811 • or if Y ou have activities as well as communities activities. questions call (218) 727 -2026 after 6 interested in establishing a sister cities On May 23, members of the SCI pm., weekdays. AH relationship with cities throughout the world. Page Printed on recycled paper S PP g LMC Cities Bulletin House approves strengthening DOER appoints local election authority equity Y p Y Y On Tuesday, April 30, the House functions can seriously interfere with advisory approved H.F. 478, the secretary of balloting and access of voters to the state's elections "housekeeping" polls.); legislation. The bill would strengthen * Insist that, except in the event of committee _ the authority of city election officials an emergency that makes the space to conduct elections at the local level. unusable, the location of the polling In advance of final approval by The bill, which will now go to the place in the facility may not be moved the Legislature for authority to adopt Senate, for action, contains election without prior approval; . rules regarding the implementation of improvements which the League has * Require that parking spaces not the state's pay equity law, the depart- sought. It would reduce costs and in use for facility activities be made ment of employee relations (DOER) make it easier for cities to carry out available for voters; has selected a 28 -member committee their responsibility for locating * Allocate costs of conducting to assist in drafting rules. The League precinct polling places and conducting elections to school districts for a of Minnesota Cities has four members balloting for combined city/school proportionate share of the expenses of on the committee. They are: elections. elections held simultaneously with The House voted unanimously to regular city elections; and Karen Anderson give city clerks or those local officials * Determine the voting method to Councilmember responsible for conducting elections be used in combined local elections Minnetonka authority to: when other elections are scheduled on * Approve facilities made avail - the same day as regular city elections. Samantha Ordeno able by schools and other public Both House and Senate versions Administrator Mounds View agencies for precinct polling places of the legislation also contain a change and parking; in the order of balloting for local Steve Perkins * Require that such facilities be of elective offices, making the listing of Administrator sufficient size to accommodate all city elective offices on the ballot Luverne election activities and to be in a ' appear immediately following federal, location separated from other activities state, and county levels of goverment Sherrie Le occurring in the building (This is and prior to the listing of elective Personnel Advisor particularly important in schools judicial positions. AH League of Minnesota Cities where class activities and other school Taxes, continued from page 5 Reminder The League of Minnesota for local aid programs through the ARnCLE 9 .1..i Cities staff would like to "property tax relief account." In the Miscellaneous remind city officials to keep bill, the account would receive 42.8 An additional $1 million would us informed, on an on -going percent of the six cent sales tax fund for tax reductions for border city basis, of any changes in receipts in fiscal year 1992, and 39 enterprise zones, outside cities of the elected officials, clerks, percent for fiscal years after 1992. first class. managers, or department This article also includes special The bill would authorize the city heads in your city. provisions for the cities of Blooming- of Crookston to establish a special ton Mankato, Winona and Rochester. i will help k e ter. service district within its borders. SH SH This e p us keep our records up-to-date at all times. Thank you for your cooperation. May 3,1991 Printed on recycled paper Page 9 Federal update Legislation could return control of billboards to cities City officials should contact But cities have increasingly of trees and vegetation along public Senators Durenberger and Wellstone to demanded the right to regulate and rights -of -way is occurring; and in urge them to return control over remove billboards along roadsides. some instances, destroying trees existing billboards to local govern- The introduction of the visual pollu- planted with federal highway beautifi- ment. Sen. Claiborne Pell (Rhode lion control act of 1991 gives Congress cation funds during the 1960s. Island) has introduced legislation that the opportunity to restore the ability of Amoritization allows local would allow cities (and states) to cities to limit the spread of billboards. government to use land use authority remove nonconforming billboards The new legislation would restore to compensate billboard owners by through amoritization. local authority to remove non- allowing them to maintain the bill - Hopefully the proposal will be conforming billboards using amoritiza- board for a grace period, usually five added to the reauthorization of the lion while not requiring the removal of to seven years, during which owners surface transportation assistance act any legally erected billboards. Local can recoup their original investment now under consideration by the Senate governments would have the authority and earn additional income. Environment and Public Works to determine whether or not to remove In 1978, the ability of cities to use Committee. Both Minnesota senators signs. The bill would call for a mora- that authority was removed. Since serve on this committee. torium on the construction of new 1983, there have been no federal funds In 1965, Congress enacted the billboards along federal highways. appropriated for billboard removal. highway beautification act (HBA), Supporters of the legislation, Since few cities have the financial which was expected to control the including the National League of resources to pay for removing such number of billboards along the Cities, claim that new billboards are signs, removal of unsightly billboards nation's highways. But the federal law being constructed faster than ever. has rapidly declined. From 1986 to has been amended over the years to Environmentalists argue that many of 1988, only 2,657 nonconforming protect many of the billboard loca- the billboards needlessly destroy trees billboards were removed. In the tions. The current law prohibits cities on public land and urge that the law meantime, an additional 47,500 new from removing many billboards prohibit such destruction. Clearcutting billboards were constructed. AH through local land use ordinances. Banking reform bill to ease tax - exempt bond restrictions Legislation that would ease provements. Complex municipal bond banks to deduct their interest costs for federal tax restrictions on municipal regulations have made it more difficult owning bonds. tax - exempt bond authority has been and costly to determine what cities can The bill is similar to legislation introduced in both the House and finance. introduced last session to implement Senate. Senator Durenberger is being The legislation would increase recommendations of the Anthony urged to co- sponsor the legislation, S. from $5 to $25 million the threshold Commission. The commission is made 913 (Baucus and Dodd). The bill is a exemption for compliance with federal up of local government officials and companion to H.R. 710, " introduced by arbitrage requirements. It would elimi- others from associations representing Representative Beryl Anthony to nate the requirement that cities restrict cities and other local units of govern- provide relief from some of the costly the rate of interest earnings from such ment as well as goverment finance and complex bond provisions of the bond sales to comply with federal officers. 1986 tax reform act that have directly rebate requirements. It is hoped that The National League of Cities and affected cities. enactment of the reforms will increase the League of Minnesota Cities have The measure would also provide the market for potential purchasers of adopted policies that support such incentives for banks to purchase bonds tax - exempt bonds for small bond changes in federal regulation of tax - that cities sell to pay for public im- issues ($10 -$25 million) by allowing exempt financing. All Page 10 Printed on recycled paper LMC Cities Bulletin Bill status Courts and crime Uniform traffic tickets Alternative activities; H.F.728 Rereferred to Committee on criminal penalties Appropriations. H.F. 1231 No action taken. Towing of unlawfully S.F.1456 No action taken. S.F.1067 No action taken. parked vehicles H.F.155 Passed House. Service, enforcement, and effect Eminent domain over railroad S.F.816 On Senate floor. of subpoena properties H.R.751 No action taken. H.R.1277 On House floor. Examination before eminent S.F.495 No action taken. S.F.834 Rereferred to Committee on domain proceedings Transportation. H.F.236 Passed House. Order of protection violations S.F.186 On Senate floor. H.F.768 No action taken. Assault of public employees S.F.716 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.1310 Passed House. Constitutional amendment Finance. S.F.1206 On Senate floor. guaranteeing right to bear arms H.F.263 No action taken. Cororner and medical Domestic abuse data system S.F.110 No action taken. examiner data H.F.1336 No action taken. H.F.891 No action taken. S.F.1191 No action taken. School district tort liability limit S.F.812 No action taken. H.F.265 No action taken. Interest on arbitration awards S.F.438 No action taken. Logging roads H.F.1346 No action taken. H.F.916 On House floor. S.F.1208 No action taken. Volunteer service act S.F.899 On Senate floor. H.F.286 No action taken. Occupational safety and S.F.349 No action taken. Volunteer service act health violations H.F.970 No action taken. H.F.1382 Rereferred to Committee on Joint and several liability S.F.624 No action taken. Labor- Management H.F.396 No action taken. Relations S.F.591 No action taken. Assault weapons S.F.1249 No action taken. H.F.1032 No action taken. Use of deadly force S.F.978 No action taken. Traffic violation prosecution H.F.414 Passed House. H.F.1425 No action taken. S.F.392 On Senate floor. Sexual orientation S.F.1359 No action taken. H.F.1091 No action taken. Volunteer service act S.F.1000 No action taken. Criminal justice impact statements H.F.449 No action taken. H.F.1449 No action taken. No Senate companion. Human rights defenses S.F.271 Rereferred to Committee on H.R.1123 Rereferred to Committee on Finance. Public disclosure of rivate fact p Rules and Legislative H.F.469 No action taken. Administration. Mandatory HIV testing in criminal S.F.408 N action k No act o taken. S.F.1069 Rereferred to Committee on sexual conduct crimes Employment. H.F.1605 No action taken. Obscenity S.F.612 No action taken. H.F.520 No action taken. Seat belt use S.F.372 No action taken. H.F.1145 No action taken. Assault weapon liability S.F.766 On Senate floor. No House companion. License plate impoundment S.R.392 No action taken. H.F.619 No action taken. Human rights violations: S.F.375 No action taken. Statute of limitations Criminal harassment H.F.1170 On House floor. No House companion. Breathalyzers in liquor S.F.268 On Senate floor. S.F.647 No action taken. establishments H.F.675 No action taken. S.F.634 On Senate floor. May 3, 1991 Printed on recycled paper S1 Bill status continued. Pistol permit fees Port authorities Time off to vote in state rimar 0 p Y No House companion. P H.R997 On House floor. H.F.326 In conference committee. S.F.680 No action o taken. .F S . 1 021 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.552 In conference conrnrittee. Taxes and Tax Law. Traffic regulations Experimental mail ballot for 1992 No House companion. Seed capital fund presidential primary S.F.701 No action taken. H.F.1088 On House floor. H.F.397 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.1037 Rereferred to Committee on Appropriations. Drug sale or possession penalties Taxes and Tax Law. S.R.263 No action taken. No House companion. S.F.736 No action taken. Tax increment financing Trainee election judges H.R1224 No action taken. H.F.398 Passed House. Undercover operations S.F.1255 No action taken. S.F.750 On Senate floor. No House companion. S.R787 No action taken. Tax increment financing Voter registration list H.F.1497 No action taken. H.F.478 Passed House Speeding violations S.F.1443 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.508 On Senate floor. No House companion. Taxes and Tax Law. S.17-956 No action taken. Levy limit exemption Regulating and licensing builders for redistricting Economic development and contractors H.F.634 No action taken. No House companion. S.F.642 No action taken. S.R94 No action taken. Development societies Redistricting changes ' H.F.359 No action taken. Public facilities authority H.F.635 Rereferred to Committee on No Senate Companion. No House companion. General Legislation, S.F.1087 Rereferred to Committee on Veterans Affairs, and Greater Minnesota Corporation Finance. Gaming. H.F.686 No action taken. S.F.643 Rereferred to Committee on No Senate companion. Penalties and interest Finance. No House companion. Transfer S.F.1114 No action taken. Change in ballot wording H.F.687 No action taken. H.F.711 Rereferred to Committee on No Senate Companion. Elections and ethics General Legislation, Veterans Affairs, and Rural development Gaming. H.17-710 Rereferred to Committee on Withdrawal of candidates for S.F.638 On Senate floor. Taxes. state office S.F.446 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.137 Passed. Limit of election dates Taxes and Tax Law. S.F.4 On General Orders. H.F.810 No action taken. No Senate companion. Tax increment financing Repeal of political ' H.F.780 No action taken, contribution credit School activities on election day S.17.1453 No action taken. H.F.138 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.943 On House floor. General Legislation, S.F.1178 On Senate floor. Neighborhood revitalization Veterans Affairs, and programs Gaming. Local government ethics H.F.840 Passed House. S.17.61 No action taken. H.F.1053 No action taken. S.F.286 Passed Senate. S.F.225 Rereferred to Committee on Delivery of absentee ballots Finance. Tax increment financing H.F.194 No action taken. H.F.964 No action taken. S.F.185 No action taken. S.17.1012 Rereferred to Committee on T a x es a T ax L aw. S2 Printed on recycled paper LMC Cities Bulletin Bill status continued Campaign contribution reporting Petroleum tank cleanup account Hazardous materials incident requirements H.F.181 Passed House. response act H.R1073 No action taken. S.F.382 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.660 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.365 No action taken. Environment and Natural Appropriations. Resources. S.F.738 Rereferred to Committee on Code of ethics Transportation. H.F.1098 No action taken. Wooded filter strips along S.F.367 No action taken. public waters Environmental enforcement act H.F.228 Passed House. H.F.694 Rereferred to Committee on Limit on city council terms S.F.1457 Rereferred to Committee on Appropriations. H.F.1379 No action taken. Environment and Natural No Senate companion. No Senate companion. Resources. Petrofund reimbursement Election date change Waste management changes H.F.744 Passed House. H.17.1472 No action taken. H.F.303 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.1134 Rereferred to Committee on S.17.1464 No action taken. Appropriations. Finance. S.F.256 No action taken. Restrictions on school Office paper requirements district elections Petroleum tank release H.F.767 No action taken. H.F.1539 No action taken, compensation S.F.1483 No action taken. S.F.327 On Senate floor. H.F.335 No action taken. S.F.108 Rereferred to Committee on Packaging requirements Limit on legislators terms Finance. H.F.779 No action taken. H.F.1583 No action taken. S.F.731 No action taken. No Senate companion. Recycling of hazard signs H.F,340 On House floor. Shade trees disease and wood use Campaign funds S.F.302 Passed Senate. H.F.784 Rereferred to Committee on No House companion. Appropriations. S.F.649 No action taken. Red Lake watershed district S.F.437 Passed Senate. H.F.428 No action taken. Student identification cards S.F.397 Passed Senate. Acquisition of wetlands No House companion. H.F.836 No action taken. S.F.947 No action taken. Coon Creek watershed district S.F.752 No action taken. H.F.468 No action taken. Environment S.R.305 Rereferred to Committee on PCA investigations and fees Taxes and Tax Law. H.F.858 Rereferred to Committee on Appropriations. Natural resources protection fund Water and sewer bonds S.F.218 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.115 Rereferred to Committee on H.R524 On House floor. Finance. Taxes. S.F,531 Passed Senate. S.F.142 Rereferred to Committee on Mandatory recycling Taxes and Tax Law. Pesticide application H.F.890 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.602 No action taken. Appropriations Water detention requirements for S.F.959 No action taken. S.F.778 No action taken. new development H.17.128 Passed House. Save the wetlands act Battery regulations S.F.667 On Senate floor. H.F.626 No action taken. H.F.927 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.939 No action taken. Judiciary. Beaver abatement and control S.F.793 Passed Senate. H.F.135 No action taken. S.R.102 Rereferred to Committee on Authority of watershed districts Finance. H.F.988 No action taken. S.F.831 No action taken. May 3, 1991 Printed on recycled paper S3 Bill status continued Pipeline approval authority Civil environmental enforcement Advertising exemption for truth in H.F.1013 On House floor. No House companion. taxation S.F.1401 No action taken. S.F.480 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.775 No action taken. Rules and Administration. S.F.1358 No action taken. Toxic pollutant release H.F.1041 No action taken. Criminal environmental Property tax refund for seasonal and S.F.841 No action taken. enforcement recreational property No House companion. H.R792 No action taken. Solid waste disposal facilities S.F.546 On Senate floor. S.F.1170 No action taken. H.F.1047 No action taken. S.F.825 Rereferred to Committee on Emission tests Certain federal leased land exempt Rules and Administration. No House companion. from property tax S.R1368 No action taken. H.F.820 No action taken. Medical waste S.F.27 No action taken. H.F.1155 No action taken. Finance and taxation S.F.1023 No action taken. Earlier mailing of tax statements H.F.850 No action taken. Aquatic farming Special levy for Mahnomen S.F.22 No action taken. H.F.1156 No action taken. County hospital S.F.972 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.152 Chapter 3 LGA for small cities Rules and Administration. S.F.149 1991 Session Law H.F.868 No action taken. z S.F.851 No action taken. RV environmental damage EMS system funding H.F.1172 No action taken. H.F.235 No action taken. Regional library special levy No Senate companion. S.F.191 No action taken. H.F.925 Rereferred to Committee on Taxes. Incinerator ash Elimination of third rate S.F.1339 No action taken. H.F.1176 On House floor. on homestead S.F.1091 On Senate floor. H.F.281 No action taken. Fire state aid S.F.405 No action taken. H.F.933 No action taken. Eminent domain liability S.F.760 No action taken. H.F.1280 On House floor. Tree removal service exempt S.F.822 On Senate floor. from sales tax Minnesota residential property tax H.F.347 No action taken. study commission Rechargeable batteries S.F.741 No action taken. H.F.990 No action taken. and appliances S.F.1490 No action taken. H.F.1444 No action taken. New class rate for privately owned S.F.1247 No action taken. airport hangers Classification of vacant land H.R480 No action taken. H.F.1074 No action taken. Local PCBs burning permit No Senate companion. S.F.1077 No action taken. H.F.1487 Returned to author. S.F.1258 No action taken. Drug abuse resistance education levy Revaluing platted land H.F.481 No action taken. H.R1075 No action taken. Packaging requirements S.F.618 No action taken. S.F.1079 No action taken. H.F.1595 No action taken. S.F.1209 No action taken. State income tax changes Commercialrndustrial preference H.F.690 No action taken. restrictions Integrated pest management No Senate companion. H.F.1076 No action taken. H.F.1644 No action taken. S.F.1078 No action taken. No Senate companion. Homestead treatment for certain recreational properties Environmental .F.717 No action taken. •nmental enforcement account No House companion. No Senate companion. S.F.462 On Senate floor. S4 Printed on recycled paper LMC Cities Bulletin Bill status continued Truth in taxation advertising New class rate on substandard Gamblin exemption for cities under 500 commercialrndustrial property H.F.1086 No action taken. H.R1470 No action taken. S.F.1009 No action taken. S.F.991 No action taken. Gambling control board authority/ posting pull -tab winners MVET exemption for police or Municipal wastewater H.F.336 No action taken. sheriff vehicles treatment funding S.F.318 No action taken. H.R1128 No action taken. H.R1453 No action taken. No Senate companion. S.F.1292 No action taken. Abolishment of department and commissioner of gaming/ Property tax reform Wetlands tax exemption paddlewheels H.R.1187 No action taken. H.F.1554 No action taken. H.F.348 No action taken. S.F.1294 No action taken. S.R1232 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.324 No action taken. Taxes and Tax Law. Constitutional amendment limiting Lawful gambling regulation state spending increases Property tax exemption for city H.F.395 No action taken. H.F.1207 No action taken. recycling centers S.F.285 No action taken. No Senate companion. H.R1555 No action taken. S.F.1233 No action taken. Changes and penalties in Drug abuse education levy lawful gambling taxes H.F.1211 No action taken. Tax exemption for leased H.F.457 No action taken. S.F.1115 No action taken. school property S.R.313 No action taken. H.R1574 No action taken. Truth in taxation S.F.815 No action taken. Changes in gaming regulations advertising schedule H.F.516 No action taken. , H.F.1217 No action taken. Sales tax extensions - yuppie taxes S.F.389 No action taken. S.F.1011, No action taken. H.F.1624 No action taken. S.F.1478 No action taken. Changes in gaming regulations Open space classification H.F.517 No action taken. H.F. 1228 No action taken. City ales authorization S.F .390 No action taken. y tax S.F.1097 No action taken. H.F.1646 No action taken. S.F.1501 No action taken. Video lottery machines Levy limit repeal advanced to H.F.793 No action taken. current year Restructuring local government S.F.595 No action taken. H.F.1258 No action taken. H.F.1654 No action taken. No Senate companion. S.F.1516 No action taken. Gambling forms H.R1552 No action taken. Commercia>rndustrial refund Capital equipment definition No Senate companion. for large tax increases No House ouse com P anion. H.F.1355 No action taken. S.F.343 No action taken. General government S.F.1313 No action taken. Public library operating Public financing costs special levy Legislative commission on children, H.R1420 No action taken. No House companion. youth, and families S.F.1179 No action taken. S.F.1098 No action taken. H.F.9 Rereferred to Committee on Appropriations. Discount for early property Homestead tax rates available S.F.116 No action taken. tax payment for up to three units H.F.1451 No action taken. No House companion. Stairway chair lift No Senate companion. S.F.1498 No action taken. No Se 5 No action taken. No Senate companion. Service sharing grants No House companion. S.F.1513 No action taken. May 3, 1991 Printed on recycled paper SS Bill status continued Exit sign lighting Liquor establishments—drunk Space rental by public employees H.F.132 Passed House. driving signs H.F.771 No action taken. S.F.137 Passed Senate. H.F.382 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.1122 Passed Senate. Appropriations. Dangerous dog warning S.F.269 On Senate floor. Location restrictions on H.F.162 On House floor. off sale licenses S.F.274 Passed Senate. Liquor establishments— H.F.797 No action taken. posting signs No Senate companion. Public employee definitions H.R.383 No action taken. H.F.202 On House floor. S.F.270 No action taken.- Loans for political subdivisions S.R.173 On Senate floor. H.F.889 No action taken. Office of rural health S.F.888 No action taken. Salary reduction H.F.413 No action taken. H.F.210 No action taken. S.F.413 No action taken. Utility operating expenses No Senate companion. H.F.924 Passed House. Mandates S.E1101 On Senate floor. State licensure of building H.R461 No action taken. contractors S.F.448 No action taken. Public contracts H.F.218 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.959 No action taken. Appropriations. Handicapped accessibility S.F.957 No action taken. S.F.202 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.664 Passed House. Finance. S.F.723 Rereferred to Committee on Shared facilities Finance. H.F.1111 No action taken. Rate regulation exemption S.F.1476 No action taken. H.F.282 Passed House. Child care providers S.F.308 On Senate floor. H.F.671 Passed House. Loan programs for S.F.631 On Senate floor. politicai subdivisions Licensure to sell malt liquor H.F.1126 On House floor. H.F.294 No action taken. Alcoholic beverage clarification S.F.636 Passed Senate. S.F.288 No action taken. H.F.683 Passed House. S.F.683 On Senate floor. Hospital maintenance Use of interactive television plumber licensing H.R.331 Passed House. Appointment of deputy registrars H.F.1168 No action taken. S.F.396 Passed Senate. H.F.709 Passed House. S.F.1108 No action taken. S.F.368 Passed Senate. Extending bar hours Utility assessments H.F.353 On House floor. Regional libraries H.F.1190 On House floor. S.F.582 On Senate floor. H.F.740 No action taken. S.F.1380 On Senate floor. No Senate companion. Utility restoration Plumber and water H.F.357 Passed House. Amusement ride regulation conditioner licensing S.17.693 On Senate floor. H.F.7 -IS On House floor. H.F.1115 No action taken. S.F.764 On Senate floor. S.F.849 Rereferred to Committee on Minnesota produced beer Governmental Operations. H.F.368 No action taken. Motor vehicle and drivers No Senate companion. license information Uniform information practices code H.F.749 No action taken. H.F.1159 No action taken. Clean indoor air act S.F.434 No action taken. No Senate companion. H.F.376 No action taken. S.F.429 Rereferred to Committee on Commerce. S6 Printed on recycled paper LNIC Cities Bulletin Bill status continued Energy conservation and efficiency Debt capacity forecasts Housing mortgage revenue bonds H.F.1246 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.1385 No action taken. H.F.833 Rereferred to Committee on Appropriations. S.F.1182 Rereferred to Committee on Taxes. S.F.944 Rereferred to Committee on Finance. S.F.579 Rereferred to Committee on Face. Taxes and Tax Law. Data practices act Refrigeration workers H.F.1465 No action taken. Special needs housing H.F.1270 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.1306 No action taken. No House companion. Environment and Natural S.F.543 Passed Senate. Resources Official control conflicts S.17.1344 No action taken. H.F.1479 No action taken. Omnibus housing bill No Senate companion. No House companion. Abolishment of state planning S.F.648 No action taken. agency Essential employees H.F.1278 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.1501 No action taken. Community resource program Appropriations. No Senate companion. H.F.1157 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.1278 Rereferred to Committee on Appropriations. Finance. Requiring of fiiscal notes for state S.F.1137 Rereferred to Committee on mandated actions Finance. Storm sewer improvements No House companion. H.F.1282 Passed House. S.F.249 Rereferred to Committee on Permanent housing trust S.F.1126 Passed Senate. Finance. H.F.1260 Rereferred to Committee on General Legislation, Building code Suspension of multimember agencies Veterans Affairs, and H.F.1285 No action taken. No House companion. Gaming. ' S.F.1149 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.1039 No action taken. S.F.1262 No action taken. Finance. Public administration Bonding allocation Water and wastewater treatment No House companion. H.F.1461 No action taken. facilities S.F.1328 No action taken. S.F.1324 No action taken. H.F.1288 On General Orders. S.F.1129 Passed Senate. Competitive bid requirements Metropolitan affairs No House companion. Ramsey County police department S.F 1343 No action taken. Hopkins- Environmental H.F.1308 No action taken. S.F.1136 No action taken. response bonds Local government contracts H.F.279 Rereferred to Committee on No House companion. nations. Public and school library S.F.1385 No action taken. Appropriations. H.F.1337 No action taken. S.F.350 Passed Senate. S.F.1003 No action taken. Housing Distribution of public notices Assessment review; validation of H.F.422 Passed House. Nicollet Mall improvements Community land trusts S.F.334 Passed Senate. H.R1370 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.27 Rereferred to Committee on Resident bidder preference Taxes. Appropriations. HY 448 No action taken. S.F.859 Passed Senate. S.F.294 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.424 No action taken. Taxes and Tax Law. Study of governmental units Construction bid requirements H.F.1372 No action taken. Omnibus housing bill H.F.474 On House floor. No Senate companion. H.R714 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.432 On Senate floor. Appropriations S.F.951 Rereferred to Committee on Taxes and Tax Law. May 3 9 1991 Printed on recycled paper S7 Bill status continued Licensing for the sale of cigarettes Ramsey County consolidation study Early retirement incentive H.R487 No action taken. H.F.1515 On General Orders. H.F.956 Rereferred to Committee on 0 S.F.304 No action taken. S.F.1295 Passed Senate. Appropriations. S.F.1060 Rereferred to Committee on Assessment review Metropolitan council Finance, H.F.578 Passed House. H.F.1531 No action taken. S.F.653 On Senate floor. S.R1323 On Senate floor. Rule of 85 H.F.966 No action taken. H.ft584 Passed House. Joint telecommunications ventures P ensions and retirement S.F.870 No action taken. S.F.599 Passed Senate, Employer paid rule of 85 Small employer health benefit act H.F.1195 No action taken. Municipal boundary commission H.R208 Rereferred to Committee on No Senate companion. H.F -948 No action taken. Financial Institutions and No Senate companion. Insurance. Rule of 80 S.F.501 Rereferred to Committee on No House companion. Municipal boundary commission Health and Human Serv- S.F.801 No action taken. ILF -949 Rereferred to Committee on ices. Local Government and Personnel Metropolitan Affairs. Survivor spouse benefit S.F.1318 Passed Senate. on remarriage H.F.299 No action taken. Specifying definition of the Metropolitan planning S.F.427 No action taken. term employee and development H.F.37 No action taken. H.F.1179 Passed House. State deferred compensation option S.F.924 No action taken. S.F.1124 Passed Senate, H.F.323 No action taken. S.R418 No action taken. Donation of sick time Library tax districts H.F.290 Chapter 9 H.F.1144 Rereferred to Committee on Police state aid increase S.F.461 1991 Session Law Education. H.F.409 Rereferred to Committee on S -8573 On Senate floor. Taxes. St. Paul residency requirements S.F 430 No action taken. H.R292 No action taken. Fiscal disparities S.F.472 No action taken. H.F.1203 No action taken. Refunds following retirement No Senate companion. H.F.435 No action taken. Sunday and holiday wage S.F.272 No action taken. H.F 312 No action taken. Metropolitan taxes S.F.1130 No action taken. H.F.1466 No action taken. Public employees retirement No Senate companion. H.F.522 Chapter 29 Peace officer education SY.567 1991 Session Law H.F.473 Rereferred to Committee on Annexation, detachments, Appropriations. and.incorporations Minneapolis employees S.F.404 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.1469 No action taken, retirement board Finance, S.F.1010 No action taken. H.R.605 No action taken. S.F.291 No action taken. Unemployment compensation H.F.498 No action taken. 13th check S.F.818 No action taken. H.F.886 On House floor. S.F.1212 No action taken. Video display terminals H.F.755 Rereferred to Committee on Labor- Management Relations tv No Senate companions. S8 Primed on recycled paper LMC Cities Bulletin Bill status continued Union organization Video display terminals Licensing of interior designers H.F.756 On general orders. H.F.1525 No action taken. for public spaces S.R975 No action taken. S.F.1373 No action taken. H.F.217 Rereferred to Committee ` on Governmental Operations Military benefits Workers' compensation S.F.394 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.831 No action taken. No House companion. Governmental Operations 5 S.F.952 No action taken. S.F.596 No action taken. Virginia liquor licenses a uo ce g q Safety provision violations Workplace safety- employer duties H.R430 Passed House. H.F.844 No action taken. No House companion. S.F.416 Rereferred Pa to Committee on S.R.832 No action taken. S.F.1351 No action taken. mm Co erce. Small cities — contract service Public Safety Firefighters relief fund H.R894 Passed House. H.F.534 No action taken. S.F.922 Passed Senate. S.R678 No action taken. Emergency medical services Employee drug testing H.R.533 No action taken. Minneapolis fire department H.F.1016 Passed House. No Senate companion. relief association S.R.550 Passed Senate. H.F.536 No action taken. Amusement ride safety act S.F.677 No action taken. Workers' compensation requirement H.F.913 No action taken. H.F.1046 No action taken. S.F.130 No action taken. Survivor benefits No Senate companion. H.F.570 No action taken. 911 dispatcher training S.F.654 No action taken. Doctor salaries H.F.1383 No action taken. H.F.1079 No action taken. S.F.1398 No action taken. Minneapolis municipal employees S.R988 Passed Senate. H.F.571 Passed House. Local regulation of firearms S.F.656 Rereferred to Committee on Public employment No House companion. Finance. H.17.1147 On House floor. S.F.369 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.1168 On Senate floor. Judiciary. Minneapolis municipal employees H.F.572 No action taken. Definition of wages Special legislation S.R.655 No action taken. H.F.1164 No action taken. S.F.905 No action taken. Richfield police relief association Maplewood police H.F.579 Passed House. Workers' compensation study H.F.151 No action taken. H.F.57 Pa Senate floor. H.F.1191 No action taken. S.F.164 No action taken. No Senate companion. Mankato and North Mankato: Crookston special service district tax vehicle excise Workers' compensation H.F.157 Rereferred to Committee on Motor Motor Rereferred excise to Committee on t H.R.1302 No action taken. Taxes. Taxes. S.F.1090 No action taken. S.F.119 On Senate floor. S.F.948 Rereferred to Committee on Workers' compensation Special assistance for town bridges Taxes and Tax Law. H.F.1422 Passed House. H.F.159 No action taken. Duluth— extension of authorization S.F.1248 Passed Senate. S.F.100 Rereferred to Committee on of sales tax Finance. H.F.953 No action taken. Family leave S.F.637 No action taken. H.F.1433 On House floor. S.17.1317 On Senate floor. May 3,1991 Printed on recycled paper S9 Bill status continued Cottage Grove, Woodbury, St. Paul Excise tax for fuel- efficiency Speed zone regulation by cities Park, and Newport: Special levy of vehicles H.F.835 No action taken. H.F.1124 No action taken. H.F.369 No action taken. S.F.1131 No action taken. S.F.907 No action taken. S.F.287 No action taken. Littering fines St. Paul economic development Reporting of airport development H.F.882 Passed House. H.F.1249 Passed House. H.F.377 No action taken. S.F.986 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.1172 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.331 On Senate floor. Finance. Economic Development and Housing. Bicycle registration and fees Hennepin County Highway 18 H.F.386 No action taken. appropriation Minneapolis small business loans S.F.1014 No action taken. H.R.901 No action taken. H.F.1269 On House floor. S.F.697 No action taken. No Senate companion. Rustic roads H.F.450 No action taken. Natural preservation route Ramsey County: Authority to exceed S.F.345 No action taken. designation library special levy limits H.R.1304 No action taken. H.F.1369 No action taken. Wheelchair securements S.F.799 No action taken. S.F.1195 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.465 On House floor. Taxes and Tax Law. S.F.132 Passed Senate. Handicapped parking H.F.1520 Rereferred to Committee on St. Paul: Exemption from county Transportation department bill Appropriations. K road and bridge levies H.F.473 Rereferred to Committee on No Senate companion. H.F.1640 No action taken. Appropriations. S.F.1494 No action taken. S.F.477 Rereferred to Committee on Studded tires for rural mail carriers Finance. H.F.1620 No action taken. Transportation S.F.797 No action taken. Seat belt violations H.R.627 No action taken. Bridge funding Fee limitation for road work No Senate companion. H.F.1641 No action taken. H.F.83 Rereferred to Committee on S.F.1503 Rereferred to Committee on Appropriations. Seat belt violations Rules and Administration. S.F.93 Rereferred to Committee on H.F.628 Rereferred to Committee on Finance. Appropriations. Televisions in motor vehicles S.F.542 Rereferred to Committee on No House companion. Town roads as detours H.F.237 No action taken. Finance. S.R650 No action taken. S.F.197 No action taken. Triple - trailer study Motor carrier regulations H.F.676 Rereferred to Committee on No House companion. Railroad traffic within cities Appropriations. S.F.790 No action taken. S.F.31 8 No action taken. S.F.1076 Rereferred to Committee on .F.312 No action taken. Finance. Flashing green lights for emergency vehicles Bikeways, bicycle regulat ".,n, and Traffic regulation clarifications No House companion. highway planning H.R.789 Returned to author. S.F.1472 No action taken. H.F.355 No action taken. No Senate companion. S.F.1015 No action taken. Transportation utility Handicapped parking clarifications No House companion. H.F.823 On General Orders. S.F.1491 No action taken. S.F.765 Passed Senate. S10 Printed on recycled paper LMC Cities Bulletin * Indicates League support :3r enerzi combrsnance to League policies. Finance and ta. -, ` d,-,ls than ten percent over the net property H ou si ng I axes Payable in the prior year, with dollar limitations. Local governments ;Market value increase iimitation would receive payment of the target - Low income housing H.F.1588 (McPherson, icoppendra ver, ;no credit, in lieu of the expected S.F. 1448 (Reichgott, Pogemiller, Swenson, Haukoos) (Taxes) would set property taxes, when they receive Metzen, D.J. Johnson), H.F. 1623 out situations whereby the market other state aid payments. SH (Rest) would require that data on value of homesteads owned by people individuals that political subdivisions at least 65 ears old c s y could not exceed interest on delinquent faxes maintain (city or county HRAs) in the previous year's value. SH S.F.1485 (Stumpf) Taxes & Tax order to determine whether property i s P ( Laws) would double the interest on eligible to be classified as low-income Lottery proceeds for cities delinquent property taxes if the housing is private data, but it may he and towns Y --oregate tax capacity of the disclosed to 1 - H.F.1599 (Farrell) (General Lc�isia- J p y e o rt P Y coun an d oral asses exceeds 15 percent of the total tax sors. To qualify as low- income lion) would appropriate 25 l,crcent of capacity in a school district. Effective housing, the taxpayer must make an the net proceeds from the state loacry for taxes deemed delinquent after irrevocable election regarding rent to cities and towns. These local ecember 31, 1991. Companion restriction and income of tenants. governments would receive ibis 1.81645 (Tunheim). SH New buildings and rehabilitated distribution in proportion to the uoss buildings meeting certain federal lottery receipts the city collects. T:ie County fee on special assessments, requirements would qualify as low - bill would require this funding to go >> roperty tax liability changes income housing. In addition, the bill for property tax relief. Effective nor S.R1489 (De-Cramer) (Taxes & Tax would require developers to sign an net lottery proceeds deposited in the Laws) would authorize county auditors agreement with the local housing and state treasury after June 30, 1991. SH to charge and collect a fee of up to $5 redevelopment authority to meet the per parcel for each special assessment low- income requirements for 15 !x ears. q v Tax rate changes for homesteads and certified on that property and for each The bill would require the local commerciaVndustrfal ro ert P P Y charge. Personal liability unpaid h • c. o ncy (or H.F.1 P ty is housing and redevelopment n l e t a 636 (K. Nelson, Long) (Taxes) extended for certain delinquent county HRA if there is no loc�al HRA) would eliminate the third tier class rate property taxes. SH to review records annually to deter- for homestead property; all homestead mine if the owner or developer is property valued over S68,CW would Property tax and income tax rate meeting the requirements. The agency be taxed at the two percent class rate. changes, working family credit would have to report to the assessor The bill would reduce the rate on S.F.1531 (Marty) (Taxes & Tax Laws) who would then determine the classifi- commercial and industrial property would eliminate the third tier class rate cation of the property. If the assessor valued over $100,000 to 4.85 percent for homestead property; all homestead determines that the low- income for taxes payable in 1992, 4.75 percent residential property valued over requirements have not been met, an for taxes payable in 1993, and 4.65 $68,000 would be taxed at the two additional tax is imposed. AL percent for 1994 and thereafter. percent rate. The bill would reduce Effective for taxes levied in 1991, the tax rate on rental residential Personnel payable in 1992, and thereafter. property of three units or less to 2.8 Companion S.F.1493 (Ranum). SH percent (currently 3.0 percent). The bill would increase the upper income Peace officer benefits Direct property tax deduction tax rates; the rates would be six H.F.1663 (Gruenes) (Judiciary) would H.F.1650 (Heir, Ogren Blatz, 1. percent, eight percent, 8.5 percent, and Provide death benefits to dependents Anderson, Gutknecht) (Taxes) would 12 percent. An r of peace officers killed in the line of change appropriation nation of a the currents stem of refund P g r nmd } �250,C40 would be made to advertise duty. The bill would also expand the for property tax credits for lower- the availability of a newly created definition of "killed in the line of income homeowners to a direct "Minnesota working family credit." duty" to include deaths from natural deduction from the property tax Rate changes would be effective for causes or deaths that occur during statement. The bill would make the g e o employment for an taxes levied in 1991, payable in 1992, independent PY credit available on the property tax and thereafter. SH firefighting corporation. TB increase on a homestead which is more flay 3 , 1991 Primed on recycled paper BI Bill summaries continued Special legislation White Bear Lake: Electric service Cloquet: Permitting levy outside of area boundary exemption levy limits S.F.1537 (Knack) (Energy and Public S.F.1540 (Chmielewski) (Taxes and Richfield: Bonding and advancing Utilities) would authorize the public Tax Law) would authorize the city of funding for frontage road utilities commission to make the Cloquet to levy outside of state levy S.F.1238 (Riveness) (Transportation) necessary changes in the boundaries of limits to pay back a state loan for would authorize Richfield to advance electrical service areas to ensure that wastewater treatment. The bill would funds to the commissioner of transpor- White Bear Lake comprises one require a city council resolution tation and issue bonds in order to electrical service area that is subject to approved by voters in a special or expedite construction of a highway the city's franchise for electric service. general election before the city could improvement project on a frontage The city would have to compensate exercise the levy authority. TB road parallel to I -494. Companion any electric utility formerly serving H.F.1377 (Garcia). SH the area. TB Col"Iferences Telecommuting 1990 census data use conference set conference slated A conference on demographic which the data can be used. information, data use, and the 1990 It is sponsored by the U.S. Census The Minnesota telecommuting census is set for June 11 -12 at the Bureau, State Demographer's Office, conference called "Telecommuting Earle Brown Center, St. Paul Campus, and the University of Minnesota's Getting to Work Without Working to University of Minnesota. Center for Population Analysis and Get There" is set for May 15 -16 at the Data from the 1990 census and Policy. Bloomington Marriott. other federal, state, and local sources Conference topics include of information can be essential for For more information or to telecommuting today and tomorrow, planning and decision making in register contact Judy Weber, Depart - corporate policies, stories from government, schools, social service ment of Professional Development, industry, interest group subsessions, agencies, business, and health care 338 Nolte Center, University of Sears: report on telecommuting pilot agencies. Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, project, telework centers, and The conference will examine (612) 625 -4331. GB megatrends 2000. sources of information and ways in For more information contact Mary Brauer, Department of Transpor- Don't forget to register for the 1991 League tation, (612) 297 -7028. GB of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference coming up June 11 -14. Call the League for registration materials. B2 Printed on recycled paper LNIC Cities Bulletin Municipal ads Municipal ads are printed at rho char a to mem a fuficer. Experience in police g bercltle ingthe nandtwiceaconth ceseinvest ll -ti investigations police officer. Request application torunasecondllme .'il�eClassBull� tin ispublishedweelclyduringthekgkiati�esasbnandtwicramonth g P q PP during the Interim, the time between sessions. Municipal Ads will appear in the next available Cities form from City Administrator's Office, City of # B"Hadn. Cities have the right to reject any or all bids on equipment or proposals, and to waive any Marshall, 344 W. Main, Marshall, MIN 56258. informaililes therein. M]nnesota cities are equal opportunity employers. Provide at least three letters of recommendation on applicant's general character and qualifica- to $54,808 per year maximum plus benefits. � Positions lions. Return application along with a resume to CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL. The City of Apply at Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Ave., city administrator's office by 5:00 p.m., Monday, Richfield is seeking a chief building official Richfield, MN 55423, 8:00 a.m. -4:30 p.m June 10, 1991. Women and minorities are Monday through Friday. Applications close encouraged to apply. Responsibilities include administration of all city Friday, May 31, 1991. EOE/MFH building inspection functions, including PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. The City of g NATURAL GAS ENGINEER/ASSISTANT Long prairie (population 2,786) is taking structure electrical, plumbing inspections WATER AND GAS SUPERINTENDENT. The applications for a public works director. for compliance with federal, state, and municipal City of Two Harbors is accepting applications for law: and supervise rental Property and point-of- an engineer qualified to take on the responsibili- Responsibilities include management, r syst - sale inspection programs. Qualifications include ties of its municipal water and natural gas sion, and operations of water and sewer systems training and experience equal to high school and parks and street maintenance. Class C water, distribution systems The position will also graduation; two plus years related course work in class C sewer, and class B driver's licenses include the supervisory responsibilities of construction, inspection, structural engineering, required. Interested people may receive assistant water and gas department superunten- a lication for employment form g or architecture; five plus years progressively dent Requirements include a Bache PP s with ti ge neral fie degree job description of the position by contacting city responsible work in constnicL l on / building trades; in mechanical engineering or related field. and an A.A. in building inspection. Must be hall. Completed applications should be Starting salary open. Submit application and accompanied by a resume and salary history. Minnesota certified building code official. Salary resume to City Administrator, 522 First Ave., range is $34,340.80 per year minimum to Applications must be returned by Friday, May Two Harbors, NIN 55616. Deadline is May 31, 17, 1991 to Cit Hall, 42 Third St. N., Lon $48,068.80 per year maximum, and benefits. 1991. y g Apply to Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland, Prairie, MN 56347. (612) 732 -2167. POLICE CHIEF. Orono, MN. Also serving Richfield, MN 55423, Monday through Friday. (on a contractual basis) the cities of Long Lake, Applications close Monday, May 13, 1991. Minnetonka Beach, and Spring Paris with a total For sale s ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COORDI- of 11,400. Supervise department of 16 sworn CAB PUMPER AND TANKER. The Spring NATOR. The Montevideo Community personnel plus 3 support staff. Requires A.A. Lake Park fire department has for sale a 1974 Development Corporation (MCDC) is accepting (B.A. preferred) plus 3 -5 years experience in a Pirsch custom canopy cab pumper and a 1953 applications for an economic development responsible public safety management position, GMC 1500 gallon tanker. The canopy cab coordinator. The MCDC is a non - profit preferably at a local government level. Current pumper has 1250 gpm Hale pump, 500 gallon corporation that has primary responsibility for the starting salary range is $47,500 to $50,500. Send tank, 5K power plant; Motorola 4- channel radio coordination of economic development activities resume to Jim Brimeyer, Sathe & Associates with extended console; Waukesha engine; and within the area. The economic development Executive Search, Minneapolis, MN 55415 by 6/ needs work. Asking price is $5,900. The tanker coordinator, as chief administrative officer, is re- 14/91. AA/EOE. has an auxiliary pump, Motorola radio, and the sponsible for the daily management and POLICE DETECTIVE. The City of body needs work. Asking price is $3,900. For implementation of the work plan of the MCDC. Marshall (population 12,000) is seeking a police more information contact Captain lay Bohan, A bachelors degree in public administration, detective. Must be a licensed Minnesota police 1810 Highway 10, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432, business administration, planning, economics, or officer or be eligible to be licensed in Minnesota 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, a related field is preferred. Candidate must also and have a minimum of five years experience as (612) 786 -4436. have a demonstrable experience with a broad range of economic development matters and community -based economic development Report features successful economic programs. For a position description and to send letters of application and resumes contact City of development strategies Montevideo, P.O. Box 676,103 Canton Avenue, Learn Montevideo, MN 56265, (612) 269 -6575. Letters how local governments strategies to enhance revenue sources, of application and resumes must be received succeed in bringing new jobs and increase employment opportunities, before the close of business Friday, May 3, 1991. new investment to their communities and improve the quality of life for Salary and benefits commens with expen- in a time of declining revenues and their citizens. x once and qualications. FINANCE MANAGER. The City of fierce competition with ICMA's For nine different development Richfield (population 35,710) is accepting brand new special report, "Achieving goals, the report reviews the most r applications for finance manager. Duties include Economic Development Success: popular techniques the successful gov- maintaining all financial records and reporting of $6 the city including $6 million plus liquor Tools That Work." emments used. Case studies describe operation, golf course, and $12 million plus Based on an extensive ICMA land use decisions, creative financing general fund budget; preparation of budget, survey of local governments, the packages, marketing campaigns, and CAFR, and interim repots; $30 million invest- report focuses on the 122 responding self- assessment projects. ment portfolio; supervision of finance staff; and financial analysis of municipal functions and communities with the most success- For more information write ICMA special projects. Qualifications include training ful economic development programs. Order Processing, 777 N. Capitol St., and experience substantially equivalent to It examines how these successful NE, Suite 500, Washington, DC Bachelor's degree in accounting or related field communities assessed their economic 20002 -4201, or call (202) 962 -3620. and five or more years commensurate experi- ence. Salary range is $39,166 per year minimum situation and how they developed Printed on recycled paper FIRST CLASS U.S. POSTAGE PAID St. Paul, MN PERMIT NO. 322 League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Avenue East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 Phone: 612- 227 -5600 FAX: 612 - 221 -0986 The League of Minnesota Cities publishes the Legislative Bulletin weekly during the Legislative session and twice monthly during the interim, the time between sessions. Subscriptions: members -$35: non - members -$50. Contact: Laurie Audette, League of Minnesota Cities. D onal d Staler A E C E I M � ii MAY 6 1991 Executive Director Debra Nyberg Assistant Editor Jean Mehle Goad Editor " Where to League of Minnesota get legislative information at the Capitol * Cities Legislative Staff Copies of bills Joel Jamnik House Chief Clerk's Office - 296 -2314, Rm. 211, State Capitol Environment, personnel, public safety general government Secretary of Senate's Office - 296 -2343, Rm. 231, State Capitol John Tomlinson Taxes, fmance Bill status, authors, companion, committee referral (by bill number, Sarah Hackett author, or topic) Stanle Peskw finan transportation House Index - 296 -6646, Rm. 211, State Capitol Pensions, personnel public safety Senate Index - 296 -2887, Rm. 231 State Capitol Donald Staler Development tools Weekly committee schedules, bill introductions, and summaries of Ann Higgins Federal legislation, elections, ethics committee and floor action Barry Ryan House Information Office - 296 -2146, 175 State Office Building Taxes, finance Senate Information Office - 296 -0504, Rm. 231, State Capitol Andrea Lubov Tax increment financing, bond allocation, housing Recording of the following days committee schedule and agenda, Jim Stigman (afte 4:30 p.m.) Legislative network "House Call" (House committee schedule) - 296 -9283 Tim Busse Senate Hotline (Senate committee schedule) - 296 -8088 Legislative Assistant Mary Diedrich Legislative secretary To reach a member on the House or Senate floor Julie Johns House Sergeant at Arms - 296 -4860 Legislative Secretary Senate Page Desk - 296 -4159 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Legislative Staff To notify the governor's office of your concerns Governor Arne Carlson - 296 -3391, Rm. 130, State Capitol Vern Peterson Executive Director Roger Peterson Director of Legislative Affairs *All addresses are St. Paul, MN 55155, all area codes 612 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 5/q Agenda Item Number Ilg REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT AND ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FOR TRAIL IMPROVEMENT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1991 -07 (REPLACEMENT OF A PORTION OF TRAIL IN CENTRAL PARK, AND SURFACING OF TRAIL ON 53RD AVENUE EXTENSION SOUTH OF CENTERBROOK GOLF COURSE) ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, 009CTOR UBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached * * * * * * ** * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Y es • City staff recommends the upgrading of two segments of the City's existing trail system which are beyond the scope of "normal maintenance ". The first segment is the side -by -side, pedestrian/bike trail located just west of the Hennepin County Government Center complex. The other segment requiring attention runs east -west, along the south boundary of Centerbrook Golf Course (see locations shown on attached map). Portions of the bituminous side -by -side trail, adjacent to Shingle Creek and extending through gh Garden City ark, are currently under u to 6 inches of standing y Y P g water. In previous years, this condition existed only during the peak spring runoff Y g P P g when the Creek was at its highest level, but has progressively gotten worse over the last few years as the trail has subsided. City forces have raised (temporarily) the surface of the trail the last few summers by adding successive 2 inch lifts of asphalt, in the hope that the trail would stabilize. However, after consultations on -site with a soils engineer, it appears that the unstable nature of the underlying soils and the additional weight of the asphalt have aggravated the condition. City staff believes that the most cost - effective solution is to completely remove and replace these "sinking" sections of the trail. The segment of the City's trail system along the h boundary Y y g Bout of Centerbrook Golf Course exists as an approximately pp ly 400 foot long, wood chip surface adjacent to the backwaters of Shingle Creek. This segment will connect a future on- street bike trail to the north -south pedestrian /bike trail which extends from the Minneapolis city limits, through Brooklyn Center, and on into Brooklyn Park (see attached Sidewalk and Trail Map). This trail along the Golf Course, in its usual saturated ® condition, is too soft to ride a bicycle on. It is proposed at this time to pave this wood chip segment with asphalt, to allow bicycle traffic to /from the City's main trail system. Because of the nature of underlying soils in the areas of these proposed projects, the City Engineer has requested a proposal from a geotechnical consultant. STS • Consultants Ltd., of Minneapolis, have submitted a proposal to provide geotechnical services for these projects, at a cost not to exceed 2 700.00. These proposed � P P services include the testing and analysis of the existing soils, evaluation of design alternatives and recommendations for construction. A copy of the proposal is attached for reference. STS has satisfactorily ril performed in Brooklyn Center and is currently rovidin Y P _ Y providing geotechnical services for the design of the 69th Ave. No. project. Staff has maintained a good working relationship with STS and accordingly recommends acceptance of their proposal as submitted for this project. City Council Action Required A resolution establishing the trail project and accepting proposal for geotechnical services is provided for consideration by the City Council. • %/a Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT AND ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FOR TRAIL IMPROVEMENT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1991-07 WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported to the City Council that there exist portions of the City's trail system which require repair; and WHEREAS, the required repairs are beyond the scope of usual maintenance performed by City forces; and WHEREAS, the reconstruction of these trail segments requires geotechnical services; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has obtained a proposal from STS Consultants, Ltd. to provide geotechnical services in conjunction with the proposed improvements, and make recommendations regarding said improvements, at a cost not -to- exceed $ 2,700.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Improvement Project No. 1991 -07, Trail Improvements, is hereby established. 2. The proposal submitted by STS Consultants, Ltd. to provide geotechnical services relating to Improvement Project No. 1991 -07 at a cost not -to- exceed $ 2,700.00 is hereby accepted and approved. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract with said firm on the basis of said proposal. 3. All costs relating to this project shall be charged to the MSA Fund No. 2611. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. r � _ 2 Ir �c f w R i 1 ra: i I , 1 s � f PROD Cfi CATION 4 - -- 4 i r I �r --- - - - - -- - - - -- >> ROJECT (LOCATION - r r r r , CUM TRAIT 09 SIDEWALKS -\ EXISTING ON STREET TRAILS ) �7 - EXISTING OFF STREET TRAILS 7 I I>, PROPOSED ON STREET TRAILS °- "r - - - - - -- PROPOSED OFF STREET TRAILS 1. } s' ,i ` u�nwv uua m MAP Comprehensive Plan D CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 13 91 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR REMOVAL OF HOUSES ON 69TH AVENUE NORTH, PHASE II, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1991 -02 ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: — A4 SY KIVAPP, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:�s No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached • SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) On April 8, 1991, the City Council approved 1991 -02 specifications and authorized advertisement for bids for Improvement Project No. 1991 -02, 69th Avenue North House Removals, Phase II. Bids for this work were received and opened on May 2, 1991. Four house moving companies submitted bids (or offers) for the seven bid items (see attached resolution). Ernst Machinery & Housemovers Corporation, of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, submitted the highest offers for bid items 1, 2 and 3, and Semple Building Movers, Inc., of St. Paul, Minnesota, submitted the highest offers for bid items 4 through 7. The locations of the bid items for Improvement Project No. 1991 -02 are as follows: Bid Item No. Address 1 3512 - 69th Avenue North 2 3700 - 69th Avenue North 3 3800 - 69th Avenue North 4 3812 - 69th Avenue North 5 3900 - 69th Avenue North 6 4100 - 69th Avenue North 7 4108 - 69th Avenue North Ernst Corporation is an established house moving /sales firm with a good reputation in the Metro area. Additionally, Ernst Corporation was awarded six previous bid items in the 69th Avenue North corridor, and is familiar with the City's expectations for the work. Semple Building Movers, Inc. has most recently performed work for Washington County, Chisago County and Hennepin Parks. Semple's references, when contacted, stated that Semple was capable of performing this type of work, and ® they (the references) would contract with them again. Del Miller, representative of Hennepin Parks, stated that at least one half of the problems they experienced with moving the house from Lyndale Avenue North were related to the specifications they used and their own procedures for inspection. Accordingly, staff recommends award of bids items 1, 2 and 3 to Ernst Machinery & Housemovers Corporation and award of bid items 4, 5, 6 and 7 to Semple Building Movers, Inc. Council Action Required Adoption of the attached resolution. • //h Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR REMOVAL OF HOUSES ON 69TH AVENUE NORTH, PHASE II, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1991 -02 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project No. 1991 -02, Removal of Houses on 69th Avenue North, Phase II, the following bids or offers were received, opened and tabulated by the City Engineer, on the 2nd day of May, 1991: Bid Item Bid Item Bid Item Bid Item Bid Item Bid Item Bid Item Bidder No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 No. 7 Ernst Machinery & Housemovers Corp. $7,100.00 $9,500.00 $7,640.00 $8,108.00 $8,408.00 $8,100.00 $7,300.00 Semple Builders Movers $ - -- $8,050.00 $ - -- $8,299.00 $9,310.00 $9,100.00 $8,150.00 Carl Bolander & Sons $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 R.J. Valek Construction $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $3,900.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 WHEREAS it appears that Ernst Machinery and Housemovers Corporation P P Y P of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota has submitted the highest offers for bid items 1, 2 and 3 and that Semple Building Movers, Inc. has submitted the highest offers for bid items 4, 5, 6 and 7. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute contracts with Ernst Machinery and Housemovers Corporation for bid items 1, 2 and 3 with payments to the City in the total amount of $24,240; and with Semple Building Movers, Inc. for bid items 4, 5, 6 and 7 with payments to the City in the total amount of $34,859. 2. All costs and revenues associated with Improvement Project No. 1991 -02 shall be accounted for in the MSA Fund No. 2611. RESOLUTION NO. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 05/13/91 Agenda hem Number ZH REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 1991 DISEASED TREE REMOVAL, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1991 -06, CONTRACT 1991 -G ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, D1 CTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW RECOMMENDATION: �CJ No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) On April 8, 1991, the City Council, by Resolution No. 91 -118 established the above project and ordered the advertisement for bids. One bid for this project was received and opened on May 2, 1991. The bidder was Ceres Tree Company, the company which was awarded the contract for the 1990 tree program. Ceres' bid was $114,768, while the Engineer's Estimate was $107,600. Ceres' bid represents. a six percent increase above its 1990 prices. Often when only a single bid is received on a project, the bid is rejected and the contract is opened a second time for bids. However, in this case I recommend Council acceptance of the bid for the following reasons: 1. Ceres was the low bidder in 1990, and the proposed six percent increase in prices over 1990 is quite reasonable. 2. Ceres' performance in 1990, while not without its problems, was acceptable. Most problems were with the particular stump grinding crews Ceres employed. When Ceres changed crews, the problems ceased. 3. Ceres references are acceptable. Ceres has worked for the City of Minnetonka, City of Minneapolis and City of St. Louis Park. One important disadvantage of accepting a single bid is there is no second bidder on which to fall back should the contractor not be able to complete the contract, or its performance be unacceptable. I believe that since Ceres is an established company, it is stable. University of Minnesota experts predict little or no increase in tree disease this year, so it is not likely that there would be more 0 work than one company could handle. Finally, last year when performance problems rose, Ceres was responsible and worked to correct the roblems in a timely manner. P Y i Recommendation It is recommended that Ceres Tree Service's bid be accepted and a contract be awarded to that firm. Council Action Required Adoption of the attached resolution. • I Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 1991 DISEASED TREE REMOVAL, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1991 -06, CONTRACT 1991 -G WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project No. 1991 -06, bids were received, opened and tabulated by the City Engineer, on the 2nd day of May, 1991. Said bid was as follows: Contractor Amount Ceres Tree Company $114,768 WHEREAS, it appears that Ceres Tree Company, St. Paul, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The Mayor and City a hereby authorized and directed to n Manager are he y y g y enter into the attached contract, in the amount of $114,768, with Ceres Tree Company, St. Paul, Minnesota in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project No. 1991 -06 according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. All costs of this project shall be accounted for in Fund 17, the Diseased Tree Fund. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. y P P CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 5/13/9 Agenda Item Number PC/ _ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ® ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -03, CONTRACT 1991 -C (WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION IN THE VICINITY OF 69TH AVENUE NORTH AND DUPONT AVENUE NORTH, AT TOWER NO. 2) DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, DIR TOR PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) The City Engineer has developed plans and specifications for Water Distribution System Improvements, Improvement Project No. 1990 -03, in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 90 -13. This project implements the Phase I improvements recommended in the 1989 Report on Water Works Facilities for the City of Brooklyn Center. These Phase I improvements will enhance the effectiveness of Tower No. 2, by separating it from the well transmission lines and allowing it to better contribute water to the area during periods of peak demand. The proposed improvements include modifications of the existing water mains, valves, etc. in the vicinity of Tower No. 2. (Refer to attached Figure No. 1 for proposed improvements.) This project was first brought before the City Council and established on January 8, 1990. A summary of previous Council action is as follows: - Resolution No. 90 -13, dated 01/08/90, established project at estimated cost of $ 600,000 and directed City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications. - Resolution No. 90 -270, dated 12/18/90, accepted proposal from PCE Consulting Engineers, Inc., to provide design services for the project, at a cost not to exceed $ 6,000. - Resolution No. 91 -95, dated 03/25/91, accepted proposal for geotechnical services from STS Consultants, Ltd., for a cost not to exceed $ 2,679. • The City Engineer has since incorporated the consultants' recommendations into the design of the proposed improvements, and the total estimated cost of these improvements has been revised from $ 600,000 to $ 526, "087. Staff recommends approval of the laps pp p and specifications, as prepared by the City Engineer, and authorization for advertisement for bids. Council Action Required A resolution approving plans and specifications and directing advertisement for bids is provided for consideration by the City Council. r I • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -03, CONTRACT 1991 -C WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 90 -13, adopted January 8, 1990, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for Water Distribution System Improvement, Improvement Project No. 1990 -03, Contract 1991 -C and has submitted the plans and specifications to the City Council for review and approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Said plans and specifications as prepared by the City Engineer are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an M advertisement for bids for the making of such improvement in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, shall specify the work to be done and shall state the time and location at which bids will be opened by the City Clerk and the City Manager or their designees. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City Clerk for 5 percent of the amount of such bid. 3. The total estimated project cost for Improvement Project No. 1990 -03 is hereby amended from $ 600,000 to $ 526,087. The estimated costs are as follows: Contract $ 409,017 Contingency 61,353 Professional Services 8,679 Engineering (8%) 37,630 Administration (1 %) 4,704 Legal (1 %) 4.704 Total Estimated Project Cost $ 526,087 4. All costs for these improvements shall be financed by the Public Utilities Fund. RESOLUTION N0, Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. . .. . r . ........ .. . . . .. ...... O s W v r r:rr ............. nr :...... »:.......n......•... n..:..r..• I r .. .... r....... ....... xr::: {r iirir:: ?b .1i::::;X }•: ;.y:::::. }T>;•i' ":: r. r7: ::C +ivr'':� •:5 . •°w.>..}::• }v,::•ya4r^ ' r,.: .•.:•:.•: x.,r . ,r✓� .... /....,.n" .•..• < ". .. .�:•SN.::Y.�.T•.J�i.QrfJ:Cri '':':. . �y. :. ;',w.F�. {r % �•Y. ::•:.... w ti ?'l.•:•'l.•.',.v. rX.v.Y Y sm +1iw•vlr]C_.; {/;yrvyry:;;rfp {; �'i1R3iE6:4•.w .Y.:YS53'rYF Xr ?: }:!:✓ r•L'{n PROPOSED 20 PROPOSED 1 f" . .. ". . .........::........:........: �......... ti .... .. -- ..... ... ...- ... i:• ... .... .. .. .... " -... _ '\ ?� .. ` rwwr.....�•Aw•nnnnn- ........:. PROPOSED 30 ........ : k . V: ' •:rr • r• i :.... a.:.:... a. :.:: . =<: IMPROVEMENT PROJECT �� '• �� 199 0 -03 PROPOSED 12 211 � .... .. '• , r c i > • r� . z ;: f • ATE f DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PROPOSED 24't ;:. � ... - - - -� � • ... .rr. x.....nnve.r.•..wr.. -.... •. :... • v... . r......... ! �. : :h; �w`�� �}'�'' { �: ....r... .v......nn.xr�.•.., x.•w.. .vx. n •. � � :: \Y {:•:• ••';,:••'•: '..: .n...r.a. .. a� • • • �� • . �� f . �� • :.......... r..x ::.... r .. ...: r .. . ..... 11 .. .....,r..... ...... ..... .....,.r.. ... . ..... .....M... ..... .. ....r:...... a.... f ff fff•yff f•fffN••a faf��•ffaf• �. • � w :f :• fff •fff ff •f fff•ff •ff fffff••fflNf�f� PROPOSED 8 •f ........ .... .....vv. r... •.• w.r.•• ... .. .. ... .. .. .... ... ... •:.v• .... ... - ......•.. .... ........... .. ....... ......... ......•.... .... ..........v ...... .. .. ..... .. .� ......... . s ........... FIG NO FIGURE .. 1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 5/13/9 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR HUMBOLDT AVENUE /65TH AVENUE LANDSCAPING, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1991 -03, CONTRACT 1991 -D ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP," ECT R OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: win, No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) Westwood Professional Services, Inc., the City's landscaping consultant for this project, have developed plans and specifications for tree plantings along 65th Ave. No. and Humboldt Ave. No., adjacent to the Brooklyn Center High School. At the April 8, 1991 meeting, the Council accepted Westwood's proposal for these design services and directed staff to proceed with the design. Also planned is improvement of the "node" across the street from the High School, just east of the northbound TH 100 /Humboldt Ave. No. ramp. This area had been planted with shrubs in the past, but has since overgrown. City staff and the landscaping consultant met recently with representatives of the School District, to discuss the consultant's suggested plan and tree species (a copy of the consultant's recommendations is attached for reference). It was agreed that the City would utilize the 4 species of trees as recommended by the consultant. The selection of these species was based on factors such as salt tolerance, maximum size, reliability as a boulevard tree, fall color, low -level branching, etc. While the species were chosen to encourage diversity, it should be noted that relatively few tree species are appropriate choices for such a harsh planting condition (hard surface surrounding, exposure to road salt, etc.). The Engineer's estimate for this construction contract is $ 20,200. Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications, as prepared by the landscaping consultant, and authorization for advertisement for bids. Note: It is anticipated that the design alternatives for the sidewalk /trail segment in front of Humboldt Square will be presented at the next Council meeting. Council Action Required • A resolution approving plans and specifications and directing advertisement for bids is provided for consideration by the City Council. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR HUMBOLDT AVENUE /65TH AVENUE LANDSCAPING, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1991 -03, CONTRACT 1991 -D WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 91 -117, adopted April 8, 1991, Westwood Professional Services, Inc. have prepared plans and specifications for Humboldt Avenue /65th Avenue North Landscaping, Improvement Project No. 1991 -03, Contract 1991 -D and have submitted said plans and specifications to the City Council for review and approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Said plans and specifications as prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the making of such improvement in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, shall specify the work to be done and shall state the time and location at which bids will be opened by the City Clerk and the City Manager or their designees. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City Clerk for 5 percent of the amount of such bid. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Westwood Proressionai Services. Inc. MAY 2 , 1991 14180 Trunk Hwy. 5 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 612.937 -5150 FAX 612 - 937 -5822 TREE SPECIES SELECTION 65TH AND HUMBOLDT AVENUE STREETSCAPE - BROOKLYN CENTER, MN The selection of tree species for placement in the tree grates along 65th and Humboldt Avenues is a complex task. Surrounding a tree with concrete and asphalt coupled with salt spray from a busy street and potential vandalism from heavy pedestrian traffic creates one of the harshest environments in which a tree can grow. For this reason, the characteristics that we look for in a tree for this location would be drought and salt tolerance, fast growth, and high branching habit. Other desirable criteria for selection are the avoidance of a mono - culture and the provision of visual interest (fall color, texture, etc.) Given the above criteria, it is recommended that a combination of species be planted, with 50% being a reliable, "boulevard- tested" species and remaining 50% being a combination of species that provide visual interest and variety. The species that we recommend for consideration are listed below. Hackberry is definitely a "boulevard- tested" species. The rest of the species will be generally reliable provided they are given adequate care and maintenance. 1. Hackberry Pros: Very reliable Interesting bark Cons: Can disfigure w /Witches Broom & Nipple Gall (not fatal) 2. White Ash Pros: Quite reliable Good fall color (purple) Cons: Susceptible to Ash Yellows Not locally available 3. Am. Linden Pros: Quite reliable Not over used Cons: Somewhat softwooded 4. Honeylocust Pros: Fast growing Good fall color (yellow) Cons: Subject to Nectria Canker (Plant only hardiest varieties) - ILL MM_ heft m Sr.cn. I- a n .aur .oesrtu�v �d� TREE SPECIES SELECTION PAGE 2 The following matrix compares some visual characteristics of the recommended tree species. Fall Color Leaf Texture Hackberry Yellow Med. White Ash Purple Fine Am. Linden Yellow -brown Course Honeylocust Yellow Fine Other trees were considered but rejected for various reasons: Green Ash Overused Maples Bark needs to be wrapped and shallow roots can heave sidewalks Catalpa Litter from leaves, flowers, and pods Ironwood Concern for survival while getting established and very slow growth Littleaf Linden Low branching habit Ginkgo Slow growth Eastern Pin Oak Iron chlorosis problem CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 5/13/91 Agenda Item Number —Z/ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1990 -E, SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ON FREEWAY BOULEVARD /65TH AVENUE NORTH, AT SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY, AT HUMBOLDT AVENUE AND AT DUPONT AVENUE, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 1988 -25, 1990 -11 AND 1990 -12 DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, DIR R OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: -g No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ® SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) Contract 1990 -E, Signal System Improvements on Freeway Boulevard /65th Avenue North, at Shingle Creek Parkway, at Humboldt Avenue and at Dupont Avenue (Improvement Project Nos. 1988 -25, 1990 -11 and 1990 -12) has been completed by Killmer Electric Co. Inc. The City Council accepted the proposal per Resolution No. 90 -111 and a contract was subsequently executed. The actual value of work equals the original contract amount plus an approved change order. Accordingly, staff recommends acceptance of the work performed and authorization to make final payment. City Council Action Required Adopt the attached resolution. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1990 -E, SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ON FREEWAY BOULEVARD /65TH AVENUE NORTH, AT SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY, AT HUMBOLDT AVENUE AND AT DUPONT AVENUE, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 1988 -25, 1990 -11 AND 1990 -12 WHEREAS, pursuant to written contract signed with the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Killmer Electric Co. Inc. has satisfactorily completed the following improvements in accordance with said contract: SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 1988 -25, 1990 -11 AND 1990 -12 CONTRACT 1990 -E NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The work completed under said contract is accepted and approved according to the following schedule: Project Costs Original Contract And Approved As Ordered Change Order Final Amount Contract $ 195,000 $ 192,229.00 $ 192,229.00 Contingency 29,250 0.00 0.00 Engineering 8% 17 940 15 378.32 15 3 g g C ) 78.32 Administrative (1 %) 2,240 1,922.29 1,922.29 Legal and Bonding (1 %) 2,240 1,922.29 1,922.29 Interest 22.430 0.00 0.00 Total Estimated Project Cost $ 269,100 $ 211,451.90 $ 211,451.90 Project Revenues Original Contract And Approved As Ordered Change Order Final Amount Regular Municipal State Aid Fund 2613 $ 269,100 $ 196,740.64 $ 196,740.64 Local Municipal State Aid Fund 2611 -0- 14.711.26 14.711.26 Total $ 269,100 $ 211,451.90 $ 211,451.90 RESOLUTION NO. 2. The value of work actually performed is equal to the original contract value plus an approved change order. 3. It is hereby directed that final payment to made on said contract, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvements under said contract shall be $ 192,229.00. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 5/13/9 Agenda Item Number V REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, 1991 SEALCOATING, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1991 -05, CONTRACT 1991 -F ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: ,-Y SY' NAPP, DPR CTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS *,� �/-j MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes ) The 1991 General fund budget for Division 42 - Street Maintenance - includes an appropriation of $160,000 for the continuation of the City's established street sealcoating program. In anticipation of additional cuts in state aids, the City Manager has requested that this program be reduced by approximately 15% (i.e. $24,000), recognizing that such a reduction, while reducing current costs, will result in increased long -term costs. (Note: If that same reduction were continued into the future, the net result would be that the average time lapse between sealcoats on all streets in the City would be increased from 8 years to 9 years.) Accordingly, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for this work, including the same modifications which were incorporated into the specifications for the 1990 program at the request of the Council; i.e. - to provide for the use of smaller, less aggressive aggregates on lower traffic residential streets, while specifying the larger more durable aggregates for use on higher- traffic streets. During 1990, the use of the smaller aggregate proved to be satisfactory and cost effective. In addition, the 1990 specifications requested each bidder to bid specific prices for the use of different types of aggregate, and allowed the City to award the contract based on the City Council's determination of which alternate best served the City's needs. Using this same approach, the proposed specifications for the 1991 project assures the greatest competition between material suppliers while allowing the City Council to make its final choice of alternates. Depending on which alternate is selected, we estimate the total costs will be between $128,000 (20% below the budgeted amount) and $146,300 (9% below the budgeted amount). Obviously, we cannot know the actual costs until bids are received. In addition, the City Engineer recently met with representatives of the material suppliers and sealcoating contractors, to discuss the results of recent changes in the technical specifications used for the work. It was then suggested, and now recommended that the City vary the application rates for bituminous and aggregate materials, to accommodate actual field conditions encountered during construction. Accordingly, the bid items for the bituminous and aggregate materials have been separated in the proposal form, to allow for fair pricing by the contractor. A map showing the areas included in this proposed sealcoating project is attached for reference. (Note: The areas shown as FA -3 (Mod) are the higher- traffic areas for which the larger, more durable aggregate is specified. The areas shown as FA -2 (Mod) are the low- traffic areas for which the smaller aggregates are specified. City Council Action Required A resolution approving plans and specification and directing advertisement for bids is provided for consideration. r Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, 1991 SEALCOATING, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1991 -05, CONTRACT 1991 -F WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported to the City Council that it is necessary and in the best interests of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota to sealcoat various City streets; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared specifications for the proposed work; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has estimated the construction cost of said improvement to be between $ 128,000 and $ 146,300, depending on which alternate bid is selected by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The following project is hereby established: 1991 SEALCOATING, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1991 -05 2. The specifications for Contract 1991 -F for said improvement project prepared by the City Engineering are hereby approved and ordered filed with the City Clerk. 3. The Cit Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least twice in the official newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published as required by law, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that said bids will be received by the City Clerk until the date and time specified, at which time they will be publicly opened at City Hall by the City Clerk and the Director of Public Works. Subsequently, the bids shall be tabulated and will then be considered by the City Council at a meeting of the City Council. The advertisement shall state that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for 5 percent of the total amount of such bid. 4. The accounting for Project No. 1991 -05 will be done in the General Fund, Street Maintenance Division No. 42. RESOLUTION NO. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. a .0 C �I \ \WU\■■■■■■■■ ■ ■W�III ff /I •• was I1tt■tt■t \ ■ \���- �- H■ /t1� w - ww -� ? � ��.p� ■ ■ ■fW ■f■■ ■■:!!1■ tM-!fti ■■\1■/l� a,• pawn, -,�= = _ ,: ,: = =-- t ■\/■m1111111 �_ ■■■f'�■f■ �J■■■a/�i • icm - w - ♦ r► �twu I iiii� , 1 \ ■■ ■UW ■ttl w - ■� ► ♦ t - w ■ ■111 , - __ ��� �\■ ■ \ ■ ■ ■ttI �nmin; = = = �i ♦� c Ma� _ _- Iffy ■ !g���� •. i /f��� -� U11 ��1� �1 ■■ ■f ■ ■ ■� ♦ �w w . ww w■. ww w. — w -- �j�♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ - _ - w 11 MI�IIIfWI - �I �� �■ _w w ww -- -w w- w SIN _ �j -� �� � iw w n- n-Iilliii % ! : �1 �- +M �� ■° ww ww t :a rc.� ww w"� ���I ♦;i► - .w -- �i' ♦� �� �t = >:� =1j1I ♦ ■ ■i ■[1t57E■fl■ ■ ■ /Q© ! / - _ - -- an= HI _ —� � �aa -- a,iu aus v_ _w ww w I _ _ wr ■.na rr. � - — r.�.. = �� �` ` � � � � � � - �� � � � ♦� ♦� ♦� �� a � Tom'. wwl ww'� �� _ _ ■ ■ ME 22 am _ _ �N _ __ w � ■w _w E7�7 xacl ww ■■ O ■� �■ i _ -- . �.�► r '� =1 �71�/■1 �S� - ��- =') '!Z �!Yl!■■ — immis an= lZ ow ra FIE "M ow p = _ ■E, ► ■ ��� �� ♦♦ ° -w —_- -_- N M �� w■ �, �� w — �f " I ■a � � � I� ` w_ — _w ■�■ a — - ww ■ -- Mc w ■ of ��t / ■ ■■■ ■ ■■ - ■ _ -w — ■!■ I ail _w ww ■r — -- ■■ w -- — y X11 111111. ♦ �� �r L OCAL In ♦ CC ° mm aU ■/i ■a+ ■� ■� ■■ If = INDEX �.��_ �:� 111 i11111W�� m om -- - : - an No ME zu M man on 2 NMI �Il !r - ■ ■ ■IBM ai ■ - -_ _ , j - 'w � i 1 115 - . . CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 05113/91 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT UNDER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1990 -20, FOR REPLACEMENT OF BOILER BURNERS FOR HVAC SYSTEM SERVING THE CIVIC CENTER ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: SY KNAPP, DIRECTOR OP PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) The 1990 budget included $17,940 to replace the Civic Center boiler burners, and $10,350 to extend the Civic Center boiler stack. The City's engineering consultant Oftedahl Locke and Broadston determined that replacement of the burners with more efficient and cleaner burners would solve a persistent odor problem and that the i stack extension would not be necessary. Brady Mechanical was awarded the contract to replace the Webster brand burners with Gordon -Piatt burners. During the course of installation it was discovered that a previously unknown gas pressure regulator had been installed at some time in the past to downsize gas pressure into the Civic Center. The new burners were designed for the pressure being delivered to the Civic Center by Minnegasco. An additional $585.55 was expended to remove the regulator and make other necessary revisions. Since installation, 6,000 gallons of fuel oil have been burned. Initial problems with the flame safety control have been satisfactorily resolved by the manufacturer. The burners functioned efficiently, with no discernable odor problem. Recommendation A resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment is attached. Council approval is recommended. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT UNDER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1990 -20, FOR REPLACEMENT OF BOILER BURNERS FOR HVAC SYSTEM SERVING THE CIVIC CENTER WHEREAS, pursuant to the written Contract for Improvement Project 1990 -20 and signed with the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Brady Mechanical Services, Inc. has satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance with said Contract: REPLACEMENT OF BOILER BURNERS FOR HVAC SYSTEM SERVING THE CIVIC CENTER NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The work completed under said contract is accepted and approved according to the following schedule: As Approved Final Amount Original Contract $13,870 $14,455.55 2. The value of work performed is greater than the original contract due to conditions found during construction. 3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvement under said contract shall be $14,455.55. 4. All costs for this improvement shall be charged to the Government Buildings Division 19 of the General Fund, Object No. 4520. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Cound Meedng pate 5 1 13h 1 1 Agenda Rem Number DDDRCC REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT IN THE FORM OF A DECLARATION OF TRUST ESTABLISHING AN ENTITY KNOWN AS "MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL MO MARKET F UN D " A A PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN INVESTMENT t'1(VGR�IIIJ *' � ' M 1. V���� CL��1v�r *�nL�1t�� *wrfwfrtw *�� *� :sir *ft�►� *ice *wit 3�►*tfNSws►* DEPARTMENT APPROVAL- 0 W. Director of Finance Signature - title _ MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached This resolution would allow the City of Brooklyn Center to participate in the Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (The "4M Fund "). This is an investment program sponsosred by the League of Minnesota Cities. Any Minnesota.City may ® join the Fund as a participant. The City would use the money market fund as another vehicle to invest monies for short periods of time. The monies in the Fund are readily available when needed and the Fund has a history of competitive interest rates. Approximately 217 Minnesota municipalities currently participate in the Fund. I have attached a listing of currently participating municipalities along with information about the Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council pass the resolution and allow the City to participate in the Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund. SPECIFIC ACTION REQUIRED BY THE CITY COUNCIL -------------------------------------------- Pass the attached resolution authorizing participation in the Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund. .....::.::..:: f 7 ,..:�:.::•.��:�:iii;;.::t;;•;�:.,;i;i;;:;;...::a•i:i.;-:::.;�:::::�::� .... - `i• - • !`i'`;is;:;':;'�.'':>: - 1^ .....:::....:�:is ii;.,•.;;:::.:::: .....::::.:: Inneso a u c : ... :::.::.::... . .. .... .... .:.:..::. .::::.:.:::::.........:.. . w:;:..'�i:i:ii::�i iiii:�::�:i:;;�..:::.i:�i.•:.i:�:.::i'::3: H ­ ` rk6t, _� 1 :•iiiiii:;i:.::::.:....:...:....::::::::is;;:..is ;Wit::..:........ ' "•`'iv:;i:i;•i:ii}ii:....... ::::::::::::....... .'.::t.i'iiiii:�i�'" - ... —:•i?:�. ...........:is iiii•.::::;,......•:•.:::.:: w ;..... :::::.:::::'.�.:::.... v:4ii:•:::::..:.;�:�.-.:::::.�:::is"- 'iii::i:::<:i'' h! — - � v:.::.:.>':::.::.:...::......:i::. .::::.^iii:^ii.t�i:i.,.-:::•vi;;;.i;.;n•.�::::::•::.::•:•:;•:•:::, '- �. - 1 " n;•i:iii:..:::::..:.::...........:...... -.... :•:::.,.;.� ............��.:.iii:::............�.....�� _'>\ .. ....... ..:..:.::i:.i:i..;...:.. I —...... u . .. .. ..... .1 •: . :is .......... i : •i:ii: .:::::•: .... :.:::.::::::::::::. .:::::::.�:::..:.:i:i y f y : :�.>�.:.�..........::.�..�::iii::.....�:.:. ...... ,. .... .......... -,5 r^ _ :::::.......:..::::.:::....... �iGi•�:<;fii;iiii;`:ii''r:zii'i':':i'ii;i;ii;ii;i;i;;,.;i - . :::..iiii;. .::: 1i::v:'::•iii'-i'i:•:. r., :iii}::::::.. ............ r v _ .;,.::::::,o-::i i::-i:�t;�:i.:.:;�ai ii is i i:i t:ii::i;�::•.i�:i::i�a^i:'a:ii: ..:::..:::::..:::::::.iisiiii::o-:::::::.��.�i+iiii:�i:•iiii:: ..... :•:::.;;.i:iii:.,::.:::::.�::.......... ::::....... - ......;.i.;�..............,::::.::::::+iiii;.;:•i:i::..a:::..::::..:::::::::::..:............ .., - _ ', .- lv'A ���i �"�'•i:;;,i:•:''r:iiii::.........::::.::::::.::�.... + l _ ......:iii:iii.• ,:;pi•......:. ..::iii:ii�:i:.:..: :::::..:........: - - ::i:.ii;Y4:;:;•.riiii:.'.::::i.i'v}i:Ji'::ti;ii ii ii.:.:.:.:.::::::ii:.:.. ...'.+ _ ti' i` ............ -i:::i:'.::;:;:;;;�'�:;!C•iii:4:::'.:is/,. ... - . .........::..:::'.�:v::.�..ii isii:i•::::::r�i:v;t>:.:.i>:'::'iii>:.i:.y::•..::::�.......:::........... l _ r wi::::'i iiii.•: is ::"�:::::::::::i:....:......' ....ivni:is i::�::�,t:.:i:<:•: � - ::is•-i...:.:: i t i•i:: - ...:.::::::::...iii:;.: ..............:. •.:::G:2:%;:;:,:�: _ 1 - I - j` aii..•. ..:::.::.:.::: ....i:�i:�i:.i i:•i:�i:�i:�-::-::.::. .:.:::.:.iii:...;.:.::i.ii:•: - i e ..T , n — :::•:::::::::::.:xi:::oi:a:a;;•::::o-:::•:::.�:::. ..::::::::::.�..�:::::::::::iiii:::•: .� - ... ., _ .: - ,-�.. iii\�i::i�:h:•iii.::::::•ii}:4;:�::iii:iii;:i;ii:::�:•i:'::;iiY;is ii:•l.: ` --y,.-- �, - - ....................................::::::::::::::::::.:::: / .:.i;'::.:;:i;i i;.i.::;i:fi.i...i•.i�.0.i...i. Comprehensive,reh n s iv e T as h Ma na g em e_ n t S ce f o r 1 nn esota M un 1c 1 p a I Itl es rvl - _ . .L - :.........:..::..::::.:::..iii ...:.::...: __, ...�:::... :.:i:.iit:.i.::.....::.i:.:.i.:.;:;.iiiiiiiiii:•.i:<:i:::: ,� ',, <c ........:: ,r • iiii.:.:.:_i::.:::.::.::::......::.:.:::::::::::..............: :.........:...:::::>::i>•: - 'c \ ..............:::::.:...:..::.: .....::......... `f - i::;..::. :.::..:......::..: ..::. M F Sponsored by the iii::::i::•i::�i:ii::::i::is:is:i:�:ii::i::::i:::::i:::i':: Lea e of Minnesota Cities Y = _ iiii..:,. .....:: r i:i::i::ii: The 4M Fund: money market fund uses state -of -the -art cash A Comprehensive Financial Service management techniques to maximize investment Alternative for Minnesota municipalities earnings. It maximizes "float" by keeping all of -� 0 he Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund your cities monies invested at all times. It com (the 4M Fund) is a professionally managed money pounds principal and interest daily and credits market fund. It enables cities in Minnesota to these monthly, so that interest actually earns interest. The 4M Fund offers. _ pool short -term investable monies and earn high- _ _ - money market rates while maintaining safety of - • Safety of principal. - principal. •Competitive money marketrates. Sponsored by the League of Minnesota Cities, the Easy and immediate access to invested 4M Fund is a financial service exclusively for assets; no advance notice is required for Minnesota cities. Accounts are available only to deposits or withdrawals: cities, counties, public authorities, public corpora = No minimum balance or minimum length - tions, public commissions, special districts, and of deposit. R = any "instrumentality" (as defined in the joint pow- Direct deposit of state payments to a lock box. - ers act) of a municipality in the state of Minnesota.: Free, unlimited checkwriting allows The 4M Fund offers investments to earn interest until checks - arange of optional programs J _ and services to help your city further decrease " are presented for payment. the time and expense of investment management. Comprehensive monthly statements for This brochure explains these extra programs. each account you open. The Information Statement and the Application • Daily statements for each investment Forms available from the League office contain and wire withdrawal. _ ore specific information on the 4M Fund. - The 4M Fund is an Investment Option The - Professional Team,. a - ---- J _ - — a Complement to and not Piper Capital Management Incorporated (PCM) Replacement for Bank Services - - First Bank National Association, and Cadre- The 4M Fund does not purport to be a replace Consulting Services, Inc. have assisted many ment for the services that banks or other finan- - public officials with their investment and finan-- cial institutions provide to cities. However, it cial needs. PCM serves as administrator and does provide a unique _service by reducing the investment adviser for a similar program for amount of time and money public officials Minnesota Municipalities and Minnesota Cities., `_ expend on their investment management pro- Cadre Consulting Services, Inc. administers nine grams. Irrparticular, the money market - - municipal investment pools and has the experi fund serves as-7- - 4 ence and software necessary to co- mingle individ- = ual cities' deposits and maintain the separate •- A convenient alternative to - direct - - accounting records necessary for each account., investment in money market instruments. First Bank National Association serves as custo- w • An investment option orthy of than of the Fund's assets: L consideration by every city that T -wants to make the most on its money, - Advantages of a Professionally - - Managed Money Market Fund - Wy pooling short -term investable monies with those of other Minnesota cities you'll reduce the- time and expense of managing your investments v while helping improve investment earnings. The The 4M Fund Charges No Fees include the following: The 4M Fund pays all of its own operating - . All principal and interest are federally expenses, including fees of the investment advis -. insured. r and the administrator. This means that yields At rates your city can select hat the 4M Fund quotes are the net returns the __ from among e most favorable rat - g tes cities earns. . available. 4M Fund Reporting Keeps Municipalities Time and money savings - nationwide Close To Their Money quotation systems allow you to "shop the J A municipality may open as many individual market." accounts as necessary and will receive a daily • Safety - all certificates of deposit meet = - statement reporting all, transactions for the day, the requirements of Minnesota law; you including all deposits and withdrawals. At the receive a safekeeping receipt for all fixed- _- end of every month, a comprehensive statement rate investments you purchase. shows for each account: Convenience — you can automatically - All deposits and withdraw transfer monies from your 4M Fund • p withdrawals. account to purchase CDs. You receive a - r • Interest earned for the month. - statement confirming your purchases; • Interest earned year -to- dater maturities, and interest payments. <� = _ • End of the month closing balance: - - Certificates of deposit.-, monthly 4M Fund statement provides - a _ - - � -- - - ` Interest received from certificates of complete summary of all transactions, enabling ; • - you to, review at a glance all your short and long- deposit for the month. - term investments. Also, you'll receive notifica • Interest received from certificates of- tion as our" y : _ - roves men s near maturity deposit Year -to -date. - Free Cash -Flow Management Consultation The 4M Fund Offers a Range of _ -_ When your municipality, opens an 4M Fund Financial Services - account, you'll be able to call PCM's toll-free tele- In an effort to provide your Municipality with a phone number for daily cash -flow management range of financialservices, the 4M Fund also, advice. This advice is made available on an indi makes available through its administrator or sub victual basis only ,to participating municipalities at administrator, the following options: no additional charge. Both Piper Capital _ Management Incorporated and Cadre Consulting -Y Fixed - Rate Investment Services, Services, Inc. are available at any time to consult with you on any aspect of your municipality's Like-all money market funds the rates that the cash -flow management, including banking, bor 4M Fund pays will vary from day to day. - rowing, or other needs. However, as an extra service, the 4M Fund allows"_ . participants to locate and lock in some of the most attractive available rates on certificates of deposit. By placing one toll-free telephone call and specifying the amount you wish to place and the desired maturity, you'll receive fast quotes l om among the best fixed- interest rates avail-. = - ble nationwide. Benefits - of the fixed -rate investment service 4 v ' 'tae '�' �- � : J r ti�j � � — 1 S Z / - .•� -- � — '/ '- _ ' `� 1 Minnesota Municipal = `yt y = Piper Capital ` -;= Cadre Consulting Money Market Fund °� Management Inc. - Services, Inc.;' - c/o League of - °v Piper Jaffray Tower 905 Marconi Avenue Minnesota Cities ° = 222 South-9th Street Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 -;183 University Ave. E: = 'Minneapolis, MN 55402 1- 800 -221 -4524 - St. Paul, MN 55101 1- 800 - 333 -6000, (612) 227 -5600_ '� �,- 4M FUND PARTICIPANTS" City of Aitkin City of Dodge Center City of Lynd City of Prior Lake City of Akeley Dover - Eyota, St. Charles City of Mabel City of Proctor City of Albert Lea Sanitary District City of Madison Lake Ramsey County Lg LG ALF Ambulance Service > it or Eagle , C ,.► lc I,•�ke 3' f, � City of Mahnonu.n Red Lake, County Alexandria BPW Eagle Lake Fire Dept City of Mahlomedi City of Red Lake Falls Cily of Altura City of East Bethel City of Mankato Red Lake Falls FR City of Andover City of E. Grand Forks City of Maple Grove City of Red Wing City of Annandale City of Eden Prairie City of Maple Lake City of Remer City of Anoka City of Eden Valley City of Maple Plain Rice County DistAlpd. City of Arden Hills City of Edina City of Maplewood City of Richfield City of Arlington Elbow Lake I1lunic. Pwr City of Marshall Town of Rogers City of Ashby City of Elk River City of tllazeppa City of Roseau - FRA City of Babbitt City of Excelsior City of Melrose City of Rush City City of Backus City of Falcon Heights City of NIenahga City of Sacred Heart Town of Balkan City of Faribault Assn of Metro Munic. City of Sauk Centre City of Barnum City of Farmington Metro Lib. Serv. Agency City of Sauk Rapids City of Baxter City of Fergus Falls Mid -Minn Dev. Comm. City of Shakopee City of Becker City of Fosston City of Minneota Shakopee Pub. Util. Comm. Becker County IIRA City of Frazee City of Minnesota Lake Town of Silver Creek City of Big Lake City of Gilbert AIN Police Dept. RS City of Skyline City of Bird Island City of Grand Marais City of Minnetonka City of Sleepy Eye Wi City of Biwabik Grand Marais Pub. Util. City of the Village of South Hennepin HSC tv of Blackduck City of Ham Lake Minnetonka Beach City of South St. Paul (y of Blaine City of Hancock City of Montevideo S. Lake Minnetonka PSD Bloomington IIRA City of Ilawley City of Monticello South Washington Cty. Cable Brainerd Wtr & Lght City of Hermantown City of Moorhead Spring Lake Park FR Cily of Brainerd City of Hinckley Moorhead PSD City of St. Anthony City of Brandon City of Hoyt Lakes City of Morris St. Anthony ILRA City of Breezy Point City of Hugo City of Motley City of St. Charles City of Brooklyn Park City of Humboldt City of Mound City of St. Cloud City of Brooten City of Iron Junction City of Mountain Lake City of St. James City of Brownsdale City of Jackson City of Nashwauk City of St. Louis Park City of Buhl City of Jordan City of New Brighton St. Louis Park EDA City of Cannon Falls City of Lake Benton. City of Nisswa City of St. Michael City of Carlos City of Lake City City of North Branch City of St. Paul City of Cass Lake City of Lake Crystal City of North St. Paul City of Starbuck City of Champlin City of Lake Park City of Northfield City of Stewartville City of Circle Pines City of Lakefield City of Oakdale City of Stillwater City of Coleraine City of Lakeland Shores(2) Town of Oakport City of Thief River Falls City of Cook City of Lakeville City of Olivia City of Tonka Bay City of Cosmos League of MN Cities City of Onamia Tower - Breitung Wstewtr Bd City of Cottonwood City of LeSueur City of Oronoco City of Tracy City of Crosslake City of Lester Prairie City of Ortonville Traverse Des Sioux Lib. City of Crystal City of Lexington City of Osakis City of Two harbors Town of Crystal Bay City of Lindstrom City of Park Rapids City of Tyler Dakota County IIRA City of Lino Lakes City of Parkers Prairie City of Vermillion City of Deephaven City of Little Canada Paynesville Township City of Victoria ity of Deer River City of Little Falls City of Pelican Rapids City of Virginia ity of Deerwood Local Gov't. Info. Sys. City of Pequot Lakes City of Wadena City of Delano City of Loretto Pequot Lakes FRA City of Waite Park Delano Mon. Util. City of Luverne City of Pine City City of Walnut Grove 4M FUND PARTICIPANTS* City of Watertown City of Waterville City of Wayzata City of West St. Paul West Miss. Watershed NIgmt City of Willmar City of Windom City of Winona City of Winsted City of Woodbury City of Worthington * 217 as of April 15, 1991 3 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT IN THE FORM OF A DECLARATION OF TRUST ESTABLISHING AN ENTITY KNOWN AS "MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL MONEY MARKET FUND" AND AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN INVESTMENT PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 (the Joint Powers Act) provides among other things that governmental units, by agreement entered into through action of their governing bodies, may jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund was formed in January 1987 pursuant to the Joint Powers Act by the adoption of a joint powers agreement in the form of a Declaration of Trust by a group of Minnesota Municipalities acting as the Initial Participants thereof; and WHEREAS, the Declaration of Trust has been presented to this council; and WHEREAS, the Declaration of Trust authorizes municipalities of the State of Minnesota to adopt and enter into the Declaration of Trust and become Participants of the Fund. Municipality shall mean city, county, town, public authority, public corporation, public commission, special district, and any "instrumentality" (as that term is defined in the Joint Powers Act) of a municipality; and WHEREAS, this council deems it to be advisable for this municipality to adopt and enter into the Declaration of Trust and become a Participant of the Fund for the purpose of the joint investment of this municipality's monies with those of other municipalities so as to enhance the investment earnings accruing to each; and WHEREAS, this board deems it to be advisable for this municipality to make use from time to time, in the discretion of the officials of the municipality identified in Section 2 of the following Resolution, of the Fixed -Rate Investment Program available to Participants of the Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. This municipality shall join with other municipalities in accordance with the Joint Powers Act by becoming a Participant of the Fund and adopting and entering into the Declaration of Trust, which is adopted by reference herein with the same effect as if it had been set out verbatim in this Resolution No. resolution, and a copy of the Declaration of Trust shall be filed in the minutes of the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted. The mayor and city manager are hereby authorized to- take such actions and execute any and all such documents as they may deem necessary and appropriate to effectuate the entry of this municipality into the Declaration of Trust and the adoption thereof by this municipality. Section 2. This municipality is hereby authorized to invest its available monies from time to time and to withdraw such monies from time to time in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Trust. The following officers and officials of the municipality and their respective successors in office each hereby are designated as "Authorized Officials" with full powers and authority to effectuate the investment and withdrawal of monies of this municipality from time to time in accordance with the Declaration of Trust and pursuant to the Fixed -Rate Investment Service available to Participants of the Fund: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager 0 Paul W. Holmlund, City Treasurer The treasurer shall advise the Fund of any changes in Authorized Officials in accordance with procedures established by the Fund. Section 3. The Trustees of the Fund are hereby designated as having official custody of this municipality's monies which are invested in accordance with the Declaration of Trust. Section 4. State banks, national banks, and thrift institutions located either within or without the State of Minnesota which qualify as depositories under Minnesota law and are included on a list approved and maintained for such purpose by the Investment Advisor of the Fund are hereby designated as depositories of this municipality pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 118.005 and monies of this municipality may be deposited therein, from time to time in the discretion of the Authorized Officials, pursuant to the Fixed -Rate Investment Service available to Participants of the Fund. It is hereby certified that the City of Brooklyn Center duly adopted the Model Resolution at a duly convened meeting of the council or board held on the 13th day of May, 1991, and that such Resolution is in full force and effect on this date, and that such Resolution has not been modified, amended, or rescinded since its adoption. Resolution No. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 5/13/91 Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: Resolution Amending the 1991 General Fund Budget to Provide for Purchase of Census Information ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: N Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached x ) • Attached is a copy of a memorandum from the City Planner recommending that .we acquire from the Census Bureau the User Defined Areas Program (UDAP) at a cost of approximately $820. The memo identifies the information to be obtained through this program which is comparable to the Neighborhood Statistics Program of the 1980 Census. The memo also breaks down the costs associated with the program and further recommends that we obtain the information on a computer disk. The need to acquire Census information was not known at the time the 1991 budget was being put together and, therefore, no request to fund such an appropriation was made. The City Charter allows for a contingency appropriation for unanticipated needs or expenses which is included in the Unallocated Departmental Expenses (Unit No. 80) portion of the City budget. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the proposed resolution which would transfer $820 from the contingency appropriation to the Planning and Inspection Department budget for the purpose of acquiring the User Defined Areas Program from the Census Bureau. MEMORANDUM TO: Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection FROM: Gary Shallcross, Planner DATE: March 4, 1991 SUBJECT: User Defined Areas Program of U. S. Census This memo is to request in writing that the City expend approximately $820 in this fiscal year to obtain from the Census Bureau statistics on certain areas (neighborhoods) within the city based on the 1990 census. This program is called the User Defined Areas Program (UDAP) and is similar to the Neighborhood Statistics Program of the 1980 census, which we also participated in. The program will provide to census users demographic data by area on age, sex, race, labor force characteristics, income and poverty status, housing units, occupancy, and other data. This information might be useful to the staff, council, and advisory commissions that are organized by neighborhoods. The primary cost of the program is in the geographic portion (maps involved in defining the areas in question) and the data preparation portion. The geographic portion should not exceed $310 and the data preparation portion would probably cost no more than $350 (for up to 500 blocks). In addition, I would recommend that the City buy narrative profiles on each neighborhood for $10 each (a total of $60). Also, I would recommend that we obtain the information on computer disk, the charge for which is an additional $100.00. The total expenditure anticipated is $820. It will be cheaper to purchase this information now than, say, 2 years from now. A .$25.00 deposit is required with the submission of the order form. This amount is then subtracted from the final bill which must be paid prior to August 31, 1991. Since this information will have value to more than just our department, I would hope that monies could be found in other budgets to finance this expenditure. If not, perhaps some scaling back on the purchase of colored graphics for the Comprehensive Plan could be considered to free up money for this program. I would stress again that we will save some money by ordering this information now, whereas the cost of some items may actually go down if we wait to purchase them. GS:mll Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1991 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO PROVIDE FOR THE PURCHASE OF CENSUS INFORMATION WHEREAS, Section 7.09 of the City Charter of the City of Brooklyn Center does provide for a contingency appropriation as a part of the General Fund Budget, and further provides that the contingency appropriation may be transferred to any other appropriation by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City's 1991 General Fund Budget did not comprehend the need to acquire 1990 Census data; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it necessary to acquire certain 1990 Census data pertaining to neighborhood areas known as the User Defined Areas Program (UDAP) at a cost of $820. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to amend the 1991 General Fund Budget as follows: Increase the Appropriations for the following line items: --------------------------------------------------------- Planning and Inspection Department No. 33 Operating Supplies Account No. 01- 4220 - 000 -33 820 Decrease the Appropriations for the following line items: --------------------------------------------------------- Unallocated Departmental Expense No. 80. Contingency Account No. 01- 4995 -00 -80 820 Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 6 Agenda Rem Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ITEM DESCRIPTION: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED POLICE VEHICLE *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: Signature - titl - J es Lindsay, Chief of Polic MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached yes ) e The police department recently had a vehicle damaged. The officer was trying to apprehend a suspect in a stolen vehicle and was following him into Minneapolis. Minneapolis officers joined the pursuit and attempted to block the suspect's path. The suspect damaged some vehicles in his path. Our officer, in attempting to avoid hitting any vehicles, swerved from the roadway and collided with some signage and a wall. The officer was not injured; however, the City's insurance carrier viewed the vehicle and declared it totaled. As we cannot afford to be without marked squad cars for a long period, the City garage personnel were instructed to immediately change over the captains' vehicle into a marked squad. This leaves the three captains, who share one vehicle, without a staff car. We received several quotes from leasing companies for various vehicles. All listed quotes include 6% sales tax. We recommend the purchase of a 1990 Pontiac 6000 from National Car Sales at a cost of $9,857. As we will receive $3,500 for the totaled vehicle, the remainder, or $6,357, would have to come from the contingency account. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council approve the resolution authorizing the replacement of a damaged police vehicle. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED POLICE VEHICLE AND AMENDING THE 1991 GENERAL FUND BUDGET WHEREAS, one of the police department marked squad vehicles was damaged in an accident; and WHEREAS, the vehicle in question was declared totaled by the City's insurance carrier; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary to replace such vehicle; and WHEREAS, quotations were received from five leasing companies on seven different vehicles as follows: Company Ouote Auto Net Leasing $1105 1990 Mercury Sable Hertz Car Sales $11 1990 Mercury Sable Hertz Car Sales $10 1990 Pontiac 6000 Iten Chevrolet $1100 1990 Chev Lumina National Car Sales $ 9,857 1990 Pontiac 6000 Ryan Oldsmobile $10 1990 Olds Cutlass Calais Resolution No. WHEREAS, the City's insurance carrier has determined it will pay the City $3,500 for the totaled vehicle. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the purchase of a 1990 leased vehicle from National Car Sales in the amount of $9,857 is hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the cost of this vehicle will be funded by the funds from the insurance company, $3,500; with the remainder, or $6,357, from the Unallocated Departmental Expense Contingency Account; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 1991 General Fund Budget be amended as follows: Transfer an appropriation of $6,357 from the Unallocated Departmental Expenses Account No. 4995 -80 to the Police Department Mobile Equipment Account No. 4553 -31. Date Todd Paulson, Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 11L Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING EARLE BROWN DAYS AS A CIVIC EVENT FROM JUNE 18 THROUGH JUNE 30 WHEREAS, the purpose of Earle Brown Days is to promote the City of Brooklyn Center, its people, and amenities; and WHEREAS, residents, the city community civic groups, and businesses participate in the annual civic celebration to demonstrate the vitality of the City of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, in order for Earle Brown Days, Inc. to schedule certain events requiring City- issued administrative land use permits, it is necessary for Earle Brown Days to be declared a civic event. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Earle Brown Days are declared a civic event from June 18, 1991, through June 30,1991. Date Mayor ATTEST: Deputy Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER council Meeting Date Agenda Item Number REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEM DESCRIPTION: LICENSE TO UTILIZE EXPLOSIVES PERMITS FOR THE HOWE COMPANY ********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** DEPT. APPROVAL: D epujy City Clerk Signature - title * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION: No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached ************************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached ) Section 35 -413.2 of the City Ordinances requires that the utilization of explosives must be licensed by the City Council. The following items are recommended conditions for the utilization and discharge of explosives at The Howe Company facility, 4821 Xerxes Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. • 1. The permit is issued to The Howe Company, 4821 Xerxes Avenue North, Brooklyn Center and is nontransferable. 2. The Howe Company shall continue to use a two - component compound, kinestik, or a similar two - component compound. 3. The Howe Company shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local legislation governing the transportation, storage, handling, and detonation of explosives. 4. The Howe Company shall notify the Chief of Police in advance of all blasting operations. 5. City employees shall have the right to inspect upon reasonable notice given to The Howe Company. 6. Authorization to discharge explosives in the City of Brooklyn Center granted under this permit shall expire March 27, 1992. I recommend approval of this license. Licenses to be approved by the City Council on May 13, 1991 i AMUSEMENT DEVICES Brooklyn Center Community Center 6301 Shingle Crk. Pky. � 6 C hief of Police2 CIGARETTE Cole's Gift Shop /Holiday Inn 2200 Freeway Blvd.�� Deputy Clerk FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Blevins Concession Supply Co. 6800 Shingle Crk. Pky. Brooklyn Center Babe Ruth 1600 59th Avenue N. Brooklyn Center Babe Ruth 7112 Bryant Earle Brown Commons 6100 Summit Drive Jerry's Enterprises 5101 Vernon Avenue S. Country Store 3600 63rd Avenue N. Lutheran Church of the Triune God 5827 Humboldt Avenue N. McDonalds 5525 Xerxes Avenue N. Northbrook Alliance Church 6240 Aldrich Avenue N. Orchard Lane School 6201 Noble Avenue N. 1 Potato 2 1319 Brookdale Center �J Subway 1960 57th Avenue N. Sanitarian% ITINERANT FOOD LICENSE Brooklyn Center Park & Recreation 6301 Shingle Crk. Pky. North Star Dodge 6800 Brooklyn Blvd. Sanitarian MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AER, Inc. Box 1146 Air One Mechanical Corp. 6317 Welcome Avenue N. Bell Air Heating 815 West 106th Street C. 0. Carlson Air Conditioning Co. 1203 Bryant Avenue N. Ditter, Inc. 820 Tower Drive Donco Air Conditioning 642 Tripp Excel Air Systems 2075 Prosperity Road Precise Heating, A /C, & Electric, Inc. 15059 91st Avenue N. Randy Lane & Sons 1501 West Broadway Rapid Heating & Air Conditioning 5514 34th Avenue N. Realistic Heating & Cooling 9077 Van Buren Street NE Rouse Mechanical, Inc. 11348 K -Tel Drive Thompson Air, Inc. 5115 Hanson Court Wenzel Heating & A/C 1955 Shawnee Road Building Official MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIP ,& Rob Ryan Oldsmobile 6700 Brooklyn Blvd. Deputy Clerk RENTAL DWELLINGS Initial: Randy McGovern 5830 Admiral Lane Anna Gullord 2309 54th Avenue N. Reolita Paray 3307 66th Avenue N. Renewal: Norman Chazin Northbrook Terrace Apts. Norman Chazin North Lyn Apartments Gary Scherber The Lilacs Gary Scherber 5820 Logan Avenue N. Thomas W. Kotila 5430 Morgan Avenue N. Deep Root Investments /ROI Properties 6908, 6912 Unity Avenue N. Joseph Veidel 7104 Unity Avenue N. Bobby and Sally Robson 1107 57th Avenue N. Edward Doll 1201 57th Avenue N. Joseph & Madeleine Roche 824 69th Avenue N. Director of Planning and Inspection SIGN HANGER Arrow Sign Co. 18607 Highway 65 NE Demars Signs 4040 Marshall Street NE Leroy Signs, Inc. 6325 Welcome Avenue N. Building Official i s SPECIAL FOOD HANDLING Sport About 6066 Shingle Crk. Pky. Sanitarian SWIMMING POOLS Earle Brown Farm Apartments 1701,07 69th Avenue N. Garden City Court Apartments 3407 65th Avenue N. Moorwood Homeowners Association 5809 Lake Curve Lane Riverwood Townhomes Association 6626 Camden Drive N. Timber Ridge Apartments 6507 Camden Avenue N. Sanitarian TAXI CAb Suburban Yellow 3555 5th Avenue S. (Cab #1345) hief of olice GENERAL APPROVAL:. P. Page, Depi y Clerk