HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988 07-25 CCP Regular Session CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
JULY 25, 1988
7 p.m.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Open Forum
5. Approval of Consent Agenda
-All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be
routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of these
items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event
the item will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
6. Appproval of Minutes:
a. July 11, 1988 - Regular Session
7. Presentation - 1987 Audit Report (7:15 p.m.)
8. Resolutions:
*a. Accepting Proposals for Furnishing of Materials and
Relocation of Storm Sewer on Halifax Avenue North -
Project No. 1987 -22
*b. Establishing Project No. 1988 -14; Replacement of
Concrete Sidewalks at Miscellaneous Locations, and
Accepting Proposal for this Work
C. Establishing Project and Ordering Engineer's Report-
Installation of Concrete Sidewalks on Two Segments of
Humboldt _
Avenue North, Improvement Project No. 1988-17
d. Establishing Project and Accepting Proposal to Provide
Architectural Services for Civic Center Space Needs
Study - Project No. 1988 -16, and Amending the 1988
General Fund Project
*e. Declaring a Public Nuisance and Ordering the Removal of
Shade Trees (Order No. DST 07/25/88)
*f. Providing for Hearing on Proposed Assessments for
Diseased Shade Tree Removal Costs, Delinquent Public
Utility Accounts, and Delinquent Weed Removal Accounts
*g. Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Providing for Hearing
on Proposed Assessments for Improvement Project No.
1988 -04 (Logan Avenue Street Improvement Project)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- July 25, 1988
*h. Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Providing or Hearing
g
on Proposed Assessments for Improvement Project Nos.
1988 -05 (France Avenue Street Improvement Project),
1988 -06 (Lakebreeze Avenue Street Improvement Project),
and 1988 -07 (50th Avenue Street Improvement Project)
*i. Authorizing Acquisition of Title and Possession and
Setting the Approved Appraisal of Value Pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 117.042 for the
Pedestrian /Bicycle Trailway on 57th Avenue North
9. Ordinances: (7:30 p.m.)
a. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 6 of the City Ordinances
Regarding Administrative Code
-This ordinance was first read on June 27, 1988,
published in the City's official newspaper on July 7,
1988, and is offered this evening for a second reading.
b. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 Regarding the Parking
Requirements for Places of Public Assembly
-This ordinance was first read on June 27, 1988,
published in the City's official newspaper on July 7,
1988, and is offered this evening for a second reading.
C. An Ordinance Vacating a Portion of Xerxes Avenue North
between 68th Avenue North and the Northerly Line of
Block 1, Elsen's City View and Third Addition
-This ordinance is offered this evening for a first
reading.
d. An Ordinance Vacating Part of a Utility Easement in Lot
1, Block 3, Donnay's Brooklyn Gardens Second Addition.
-This ordinance is offered this evening for a first
reading.
10. Planning Commission Items: (7:45 p.m.)
a. Planning Commission Application No. 88008 submitted by
John Werner, requesting variance approval to allow
transfer of land by metes and bounds subdivision at
6811 and 6827 Colfax Avenue North
-This item was recommended for approval by the Planning
Commission at its July 14, 1988, meeting.
b. Planning Commission Application No. 88007 submitted by
Robert Zappa, requesting site and building plan
approval to construct a 12 unit apartment building on
the land presently occupied by a four -plex addressed as
6637 Humboldt Avenue North
-This application was originally considered at the June
16, 1988, Planning Commission meeting, and recommended
for denial by the Planning Commission at its July 14,
1988, meeting. The Planning Commission recommended
denial of this application because it does not comply
with the density requirements within our ordinances.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- July 25, 1988
11. Recess to EDA (8:30 p.m.)
12. Discussion Items:
a. Channel Dredging - Middle and Lower Twin Lake
b. Light Rail Transit Study
c. Mediation Services - oral report
d. Police Captain Selection
e. Fire Relief Association Bylaw Amendments
*13. Licenses
14. Adjournment
'/'-' G �__.
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
JULY 11, 1988
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order
by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:03 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and
Rich Theis. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public
Works Sy Knapp, Director of Planning and Inspection Ron Warren, City Attorney
Charlie LeFevere, Personnel Coordinator Geralyn Barone, EDA Coordinator Brad
Hoffman, and Administrative Aid Patti Page.
INVOCATION
The invocation was offered by Reverend Cilke.
OPEN FORUM
Mayor Nyquist noted the Council had not received any requests to use the open
forum session this evening. He inquired if there was anyone present who wished
to address the Council. There being none, he continued with the regular agenda
items.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Nyquist inquired if any Councilmembers requested any items removed from
the consent agenda. Councilmember Scott requested item 8b be removed from the
consent agenda.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 27 1988 - REGULAR SESSION
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
approve the minutes of the June 27, 1988, City Council meeting. The motion
passed unanimously.
RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -114
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FOR SEALCOATING OF STREETS
(IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1988 -15, CONTRACT 1988 -J)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -115
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
7 -11 -88 -1-
RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF SHADE TREES
(ORDER NO. DST 07/11/88)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -116
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING A LIMITED USE PERMIT FROM THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF A BIKEWAY WITHIN THE RIGHTS -OF -WAY OF T.H. 100
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -117
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT
WITH THE DOMESTIC ASSAULT INTERVENTION PROJECT
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously.
LICENSES
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
approve the following list of licenses:
AMUSEMENT DEVICES - OPERATOR
Beacon Bowl 6525 Lyndale Ave. N.
LaCasita Restaurant 2101 Freeway Blvd.
Scoreboard Pizza 6816 Humboldt Ave. N.
AMUSEMENT DEVICES - VENDOR
D.V.M. Inc. d /b /a Dahlco 119 State Street
FOOD ESTABLISHMENT
Korean Presbyterian Church 6830 Quail Ave. N.
GARBAGE AND REFUSE COLLECTION VEHICLES
Aagard Sanitation P. 0. Box 14845
Gordon Rendering P. 0. Box 12785
Hilger Transfer, Inc. 8550 Zachary Lane
Mengelkoch Company 119 NE 14th Street
Metro Refuse 8168 West 125th Street
Midwest Grease Buyers, Inc. P. 0. Box 26
Peterson Brothers Sanitation, Inc. 740 Industry Avenue
Randy's Sanitation, Inc. Route 342
T & L Sanitation 8201 Logan Ave. N.
Waste Control 95 West Ivy Avenue
Willman Trucking, Inc. 62 26th Avenue N.
Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. 4000 Hamel Road
7 -11 -88 -2-
i
ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT
Brookdale Unocal 5710 Xerxes Ave. N.
Brooklyn Center Jaycees Central Park
Brooklyn Center Park & Recreation Central Park
Brooklyn Center Service "76" 6245 Brooklyn Blvd.
St. Alphonsus Fun Fair 7025 Halifax Ave. N.
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
Churchill's Home Heating & Cooling 818 North Prior Ave.
Conrad Mechanical Contractors 509 lst enu
Av e NE
Thermex Corporation 4850 Park Glen Road
Thompson Air Inc. 5115 Hanson Court
SIGN HANGER
Electric Light Sign Co. 815 E. 4th Street
Equity Construction Co. 561 3rd Street
Scenic Sign Corporation Box 881
TEMPORARY ON -SALE NONINTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE
Brooklyn Center Jaycees Central Park
The motion passed unanimously.
RECESS TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 7:06 p.m. and reconvened at 7:16
p.m.
RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED
The City Manager presented a Resolution Amending the 1988 General Fund Budget
and Authorizing Payment to the Hennepin Recycling Group. The City Manager noted
the money requested would be used for start up expenses of the HRG. He noted
the total dollar figure is based upon a $1.50 per household within each City.
He added the money would be used for such costs as insurance, legal fees, etc.
There was a brief discussion regarding the pending action on the BFI issue.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -118
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1988 GENERAL FUND BUDGET AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO THE
HENNEPIN RECYCLING GROUP
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously.
The City Manager presented a Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager
to Execute Any Necessary Agreements with the State of Minnesota for Electrical
Inspections Effective August 1, 1988. Councilmember Scott inquired how much
this would cost the City each year. The City Manager noted it would cost
roughly $4,000 a year, but it will give the City access to other areas such as
plan checking at no additional cost.
7 -11 -88 -3-
I
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -119
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY
AGREEMENTS WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS EFFECTIVE
AUGUST 1, 1988
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously.
The City Manager presented a Resolution Authorizing Initiation of Eminent Domain
Proceedings to Acquire Easement for Pedestrian /Bicycle Trailway on 57th Avenue
North. Councilmember Theis inquired if the five foot trailway easement and the
ten foot utility easement overlap. The City Manager stated the easements have
been modified and the utility easement will no longer be needed only the five
foot trailway easement. The Director of Public Works noted the owner of this
property has a different idea of value than what the City is placing on it. He
noted staff will try to negotiate an agreement with the owner, but the eminent
domain proceedings will be in place if they are needed.
Councilmember Lhotka inquired what the cost of going through the eminent domain
proceedings would be. The City Manager noted it would be the cost of the
condemnation. The Director of Public Works pointed out the owner is asking for
more than twice the appraised value of this property. He explained early in the
negotiations the owner did not have any problems or concerns with granting the
easements or with the suggested dollar figure, but as the negotiations went on
his position changed. Councilmember Lhotka inquired what the value is of this
property. The Director of Public Works stated it is $3,500 and added the owner
is asking $10,000. He explained a dollar amount has been agreed on with the
other property owners in the area, and he would not recommend paying this owner
more than the other property owners.
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -120
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS TO ACQUIRE
EASEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN /BICYCLE TRAILWAY ON 57TH AVENUE NORTH
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - GROUP HOME STUDY
The City Manager explained staff has prepared an RFP which will be sent to
various consultants requesting their assistance in completing a study of
planning and land use issues relating to residential facilities. He noted Peter
Patchin has submitted a proposal to study the probable market value impact of
the proposed Bill Kelly home upon surrounding neighborhood properties.
Councilmember Lhotka inquired what the cost would be for the study to be
conducted by Mr. Patchin. The Director of Planning and Inspection stated Mr.
Patchin has quoted an estimate of approximately $12,300 to complete the study.
7 -11 -88 -4-
He noted the cost of the second study is part of the RFP, but he believes the
study will run between $20,000 and $25,000.
There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
submit the RFP to various consultants and instructing staff to return to the
Council with a final recommendation for awarding the project. The motion passed
unanimously.
NUISANCE ORDINANCES
The City Manager stated he believes staff has covered all the items with the
Council which will have major impacts. He noted there is one part of the
ordinance that he would like to suggest the Council give approval for a first
reading on this evening. He stated this particular section would pertain to
several problem areas of the City and would make many neighborhoods happy. He
added this particular section is the section dealing with storage of commercial
vehicles. He noted the Council could wait to have a much deeper review of the
other ordinance sections because there is no time pressure.
The City Manager noted the current ordinance allows one commercial vehicle up to
25 feet in length to be kept on residentially zoned property, providing it is
used as transportation to and from work. He noted the proposed change to this
ordinance would prohibit the parking of any vehicle in excess of 12,000 pounds
gross weight. Councilmember Theis inquired if the vans discussed in the rug
cleaning business at the last Council meeting would be acceptable. The City
Manager responded affirmatively.
Councilmember Lhotka stated when the Council reviews the other sections of the
proposed ordinance changes, he would like to be able to go over them point by
point. The City Manager stated he would plan on placing these ordinance
amendments on an agenda that did not have many items.
There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka
to approve for first reading An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City
Ordinances Regarding the Parking of Commercial Vehicles and setting a public
hearing date for August 8, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
ORDINANCE
The City Manager presented An Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 Relating to Hours of
Operation for a Bottle Club. He noted this ordinance was first read on June 13,
1988, published in the City's official newspaper on June 23, 1988, and is
offered this evening for a second reading.
Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on An
Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 Relating to Hours of Operation for a Bottle Club
and inquired if there was anyone present who wished to speak. There being none,
he entertained a motion to close the public hearing.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka
to close the public hearing on An Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 Relating to
Hours of Operation for a Bottle Club. The motion passed unanimously.
7 -11 -88 -5-
There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka
to approve for first reading An Ordinance Amending Chapter 19 of the City
Ordinances by Declaring the Parking of Certain Vehicles in Residential Zoning
Districts a Public Nuisance and setting a Public hearing date for August 8,
1988, at 7:30 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
ORDINANCE NO. 88 -13
Member Bill Hawes introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 RELATING TO HOURS OF OPERATION FOR A BOTTLE
CLUB
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 88005 SUBMITTED BY BERNARD HERMAN ARCHITECTS
REQUESTING SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL FOR AN ADDITION TO THE OFFICE
BUILDING LOCATED AT 1915 57TH AVENUE NORTH
The City Manager noted this item was recommended for approval by the Planning
Commission at its June 16, 1988, meeting. He noted the City Council considered
this item at its June 27, 1988, meeting at which time the item was tabled for
further information. He explained staff is recommending condition No. 7 be
deleted from the recommended conditions for this Planning Commission
application. The Director of Planning and Inspection stated the resolution
which was passed earlier regarding eminent domain proceedings relates to this
Planning Commission application.
There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka
to approve Planning Commission Application No. 88005 submitted by Bernard Herman
Architects subject to the following conditions:
1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building
Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of
permits.
2. Grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to review and
approval by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of permits.
3. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical equipment
shall be appropriately screened from view.
4. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing
system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central
monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances.
5. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter
34 of the City Ordinances.
6. Straight B6 curb shall be provided around all parking and driving
areas.
7-11-88 _6_
The motion passed unanimously.
DISCUSSION ITEMS (CONTINUED)
UPDATE ON HRG RECYCLING PROCESS
The City Manager noted he gave a brief update of the HRG when the resolution
amending the 1988 General Fund Budget and Authorizing Payment to the Hennepin
Recycling Group was discussed.
FUND DONATIONS TO CITY FROM COMMUNITY GROUPS
The City Manager noted at the June 27, 1988, City Council meeting staff
expressed concern with accepting donations from those groups which have licenses
that are regulated by the City. He noted the Lions Club, both before and after
the start of the pull -tabs, have financed the police dog. He stated staff does
not feel department heads should be soliciting donations from community groups.
He stated if the Council so wishes he could prepare a letter to be sent to the
community groups suggesting other civic groups which could use the donation as
well as the City.
Councilmember Lhotka stated groups like the band, chorus, mediation project, and
domestic assault intervention program are very needy and crucial organizations.
He stated he would like to encourage the community groups to give their
donations to these people. Councilmember Scott stated she does not feel the
City has a problem at this time. She noted the Lions Club has contributed to
every group which Councilmember Lhotka noted and just about any other group in
Brooklyn Center which exists.
The City Manager stated as long as the donation given to the City is not being
taken away from another needy group and it is not solicited by the City, there
does not seem to be much danger in accepting a donation.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka
to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center
City Council adjourned at 8:04 p.m.
City Clerk Mayor
7 -11 -88 -7-
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 7/25/88
Agenda Item Number
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSALS FOR FURNISHING OF MATERIALS AND RELOCATION OF
STORM SEWER ON HALIFAX AVENUE NO. - PROJECT NO. 1987 -22
DEPT. APPROVAL:
* * * * * * * * * * * ** N *P . D *R CJ fie R *O *Ft P *B I C WO
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report. Comments below /attached
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached
Explanation
• Attached is a resolution that accepts proposals for the material and for the
labor required for the relocation of the storm sewer on Halifax Avenue North
between Lot 46 and Lot 47, Pearsons Northport 3rd Addition (5806 and 5812 Halifax
Avenue North).
The City is undertaking this work pursuant to an agreement with the property
owners of Lot 46 and Lot 47. In accordance with the agreement, the owner of Lot
46 (Mr. Andrescik) will reimburse the City for its costs related to the storm
sewer relocation.
Past Action by City Council
1. Resolution 87 -191 - Established the project and approved the
preparation of a report related to the relocation of a storm sewer
between Lots 46 and 47, Pearson's Northport 3rd Addition (5806 and
5812 Halifax Avenue North).
2. Resolution 87 -208 - Approved the Engineer's report and recommendation
to relocate the existing sewer and at a future date construct a relief
sewer.
3. Resolution 87 -244 - Approved an agreement for the relocation of the
storm sewer between Lots 46 and 47. (Under the agreement, Mr. and Mrs.
Andrescik, owners of Lot 46 agree to pay relocation costs.)
4. Ordinance 87 -19 - Vacated the part of the drainage and utility easement
where the houses on Lots 46 and 47 encroached into the easement.
• Future Action by City Council
Resolution accepting work performed under Improvement Project No. 1987 -22.
Recommendation
It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution accepting
proposals for furnishing of materials and relocation of the storm sewer on
Halifax Avenue North - Project No. 1987 -22.
•
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSALS FOR FURNISHING OF MATERIALS
AND RELOCATION OF STORM SEWER ON HALIFAX AVENUE NO. - PROJECT
NO. 1987 -22
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has received proposals for
furnishing materials, submitted bids being as follows:
Bidder Bid Amount `
North Star Concrete Company $3,012.75
Elk River Concrete Products $3,205.80
WHEREAS, the proposal of North Star Concrete Company of Apple Valley,
Minnesota, in the amount of $3,012.75 is the lowest responsible proposal
received and the Director of Public Works has recommended that a contract be
awarded to said firm in that amount; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has received proposals for
relocation of the storm sewer on Halifax Avenue North, submitted bids being as
follows:
Bidder Bid Amount
Glendale Contracting, Inc. $12,980.00
Volk Sewer & Water, Inc. $15,306.50
United Water & Sewer Co. $15,840.00
WHEREAS, the proposal of Glendale Contracting, Inc. of Plymouth,
Minnesota, in the amount of $12,980.00 is the lowest responsible proposal
received and the Director of Public Works has recommended that a contract be
awarded to said firm in that amount.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The proposal of North Star Concrete Company of Apple Valley,
Minnesota, in the amount of $3,012.75 is hereby authorized and
directed to enter into a contract with said firm in that amount.
2. The proposal of Glendale Contracting, Inc. of Plymouth, Minnesota,
in the amount of $12,980.00 is hereby accepted. The City Manager
is hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with
said firm in that amount.
3. Payment for work completed under the contract shall be charged to
the Special Assessment Construction Fund.
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:
1. The estimated cost of Improvement Project No. 1987 -22 is hereby
amended according to the following schedule:
As Approved As Bid
Contract $19,400 $15,992.75
Engineering
Consultant 2,500
City 1,550 1,280.00
Administration 190 160.00
Legal 190 160.00
TOTAL $23,830 $17,592.75
2. The estimated costs will be financed as follows:
As Approved As Bid
Payment by Property Owner $19,400 $15,992.75
MSA Account 2600 4.430 1,600.00
TOTAL REVENUE $23,830 $17,592.75
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 7/25/88
Agenda Item Number L7
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
• ITEM DESCRIPTION:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT NO. 1988 -14; REPLACEMENT OF CONCRETE SIDEWALKS
AT MISCELLANEOUS LOCATIONS, AND ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FOR THIS WORK
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
DEPT. APPROVAL:
r
* * * * * * * * * * * ** * *P * * DIRECTOR K *, **4
MANAGER'S * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report Y';
Comments below /attached
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes
Explanation
• All or part of the existing sidewalks at the following three locations are
seriously deteriorated and /or displaced, so as to be a public safety hazard (see
Exhibit A attached):
1. On easement area between 71st Avenue and 73rd Avenue from Oliver Avenue to
Logan Avenue.
2. Sidewalk approach panels at Shingle Creek Parkway bridge over Shingle Creek.
3. Sidewalk approach panels at Freeway Boulevard bridge over Shingle Creek.
Requests for proposals were sent to two contractors who specialize in this type
of work. It is recommended that the proposal of the low bidder be accepted and
that the costs for this work be charged to the local Municipal State Aid Fund,
Account No. 2611.
Recommendation
Adoption of the attached resolution.
r
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT NO. 1988 -14; REPLACEMENT OF
CONCRETE SIDEWALKS AT MISCELLANEOUS LOCATIONS, AND ACCEPTING
PROPOSAL FOR THIS WORK
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has advised the City Council
that all or part of the existing sidewalks in the following locations are
seriously deteriorated and /or displaced, so as to be a public safety hazard:
1. On the easement area between 71st and 73rd Avenues north from Oliver
Avenue to Logan Avenue;
2. Sidewalk approach panels at the Shingle Creek Parkway bride over
Shingle Creek; and
3. Sidewalk approach panels at the Freeway Boulevard bridge over Shingle
Creek.
AND WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has obtained the following
proposals to complete the required work:
Contractor Total Cost Proposal
Thomas and Sons Construction $8,550.00
Schmidt Construction $8,627.50
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The following project is hereby established:
PROJECT NO. 1988 -14
REPLACEMENT OF CONCRETE SIDEWALKS AT MISCELLANEOUS LOCATIONS
2. The proposal submitted by Thomas and Sons Construction in the total
amount of $8,550.00 is hereby accepted. The City Manager is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a contract with said company in
that amount.
3. All costs for work on this improvement project shall be charged to
the Municipal State Aid Fund, Account No. 2611.
RESOLUTION N0,
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following g
llowin voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
i
0 1�
4TH I /-
J � A— J , lZ av v �
74TH Al M
�KL YN PARK f _i=
' R W41
—
73RD AVE
z 1 I )
s s t z � z r -R iW00DBINE1 z DBINE LANE
Z
� W �1
Z I ,
:R LAKE PARK 72N6 AYE N a W s� p�E N z
s > w 7 ND Avq `C
a > > r \�� X
a a I IAMY, LANE i �z "�
,� a
EVER REEN�
EAST 71ST AVE N) I \ PORK
P L. t i
LAKEER 71 ST AWE N. 1 1 O O z N z
PARK
o
' w SCHOOL
z
a �CxCX�
,.r
- -- - - - ---
i �!� i 70TH !AVE N CITY — !
IRVING LANE N. > _ MAINTENAN
i j < ANNEX 1
EMERSON LA • WATER .2 I �)
* TOWER 1 I
26.2
f 1 69TH 3536 IAVE 1,N . I 1= j
6B�l.At+E',fl
CITY MAINTENAN h - x BUILDING a Z TH
CE % CREEK 6TAN LANE a I ` �' y -
p J ¢
y eu 67TH ¢ o
OPEN SPACE 67TH AVE. m I AVE.
f
Q BROOKLYN CENTER G TH
NIGH SCHOOL
+ - H FIREHOUSE
F Y PARK
f a I X
eC S > ,, Z
FREEWAY BLVD, 65TH AVE. N. a
ai = p r X r
a
,X ¢
c ~ k} r k Y X o w o ° m a
N.
PARK \h /v
CITY r
CIVIC CFN:PER'
4,
.I
� F LAN cAr001
�< -t X� 63R O
GAApEN7 - h I .J , P 62ND AV N
CITY ,�rh >
I �[ ✓.�� / T., SUMMIT o
f / F •~
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 7/25/88
Agenda Item Number 0 ��
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
• *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT AND ORDERING ENGINEER'S REPORT - INSTALLATION OF
CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ON TWO SEGMENTS OF HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 1988 -17
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
DEPT. APPROVAL:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *P�4* *R * * *�iOR* *O * * PUBL
*W� * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached
Explanation
® The Administrative Traffic Committee has received citizen requests and has
recommended approval of the installation of public sidewalk on the following two
portions of Humboldt Avenue:
- on the west side of Humboldt Avenue from 69th Avenue North
approximately 180 feet south to the end of the existing sidewalk
- on the west side of Humboldt Avenue, from Woodbine Lane to 73rd Avenue
North
A preliminary review of existing conditions at these locations indicates, (1)
that there is a substantial "demand corridor" for pedestrian facilities at both
locations; (2) that both locations are currently hazardous for pedestrians and
for bicyclists; and (3) that easements must be obtained from adjoining properties
if these sidewalk extensions are to be constructed at a location which will allow
retention of a minimum boulevard. Slides will be available at the Council
meeting to show existing conditions.
Staff Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council establish the project, and order
preparation of an Engineer's report. This report would more fully describe the
easements required and provide cost estimates for obtaining those easements and
for the construction costs. After the Engineer's report is prepared, the City
Council would then be requested to consider ordering acquisition of the
easements and construction of the sidewalks.
• Recommendation
Adoption of the attached resolution.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT AND ORDERING ENGINEER'S
REPORT - INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ON TWO SEGMENTS
OF HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1988 -17
I
WHEREAS, citizen requests have been submitted for installation of
sidewalks at the locations hereinafter described, and
WHEREAS, the Department of Public Works has advised the City Council
that easements will be required to allow construction of these sidewalks.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The following improvement project is hereby established:
Improvement Project No. 1988 -17, installation of concrete
sidewalks on the west side of Humboldt Avenue North from 69th
Avenue North approximately 180 feet south to the end of the
existing sidewalk, and on the west side of Humboldt Avenue north
from Woodbine Lane to 73rd Avenue North.
2. The proposed improvement is hereby referred to the City Engineer
for study and the City Engineer is instructed to report to the
Council with all convenient speed advising the Council of the
required easements and estimated costs for acquisition of such
easements and the estimated costs for construction of the proposed
sidewalks.
3. The accounting for this project will be done in the Municipal
State Aid Fund, Account No. 2611. All project costs shall be
charged to this account.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
July 22, 1988
David C. Olsen
1501 -73rd Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55Lf30
Mr. Sy Knapp,
Director of Public Works
City of Brooklyn Center
Dear Mr. Knapp:
Thank you for informing us about the request to study the
extension of sidewalk on Humboldt Avenue. This letter is
being delivered to your office so that you can be aware of
the opinions of the owners of the three properties on the
north end of the street. The families concerned are Olsen,
Arvidson, and Carson. While we have little or no opinion on
the construction of sidewalk on the 69th Avenue end, we have
strong feelings about the proposed construction between
Woodbine and 73rd Avenues.
To begin, let me inform you that your letter is not correct.
Neither Arvidsons or Olsens have ever requested sidewalk.
In fact, we are adamantly opposed to such a project.
Carsons have inquired because they have a path on the
boulevard worn from pedestrians and have not been able to
grow grass on that path. It is this path that has prompted
any of us to talk about sidewalk and we think we have an
idea that should be considered before bulldozing and pouring
concrete.
After a meeting of members of each family on July 21, and
after a discussion with personnel from the city's
Engineering Department, we ask that the plan for sidewalk in
our area be dropped or at least postponed for a much less
expensive plan. It is our opinion that the traffic on the
boulevard is primarily the result of pedestrians catching
the MTC bus at a new stop established in the last couple of
years at our property, about 150 feet south of 73rd Avenue.
Until that stop had been established, there was no apparent
wear on the boulevard. We support this opinion with the
knowledge that there are no grade school children that
travel from this area to Evergreen School and that the
Junior and Senior High busses do not stop at locations that
cause students to travel this route. There are other bits
of evidence as well that suggest that building the sidewalk
would be a virtual waste.
We seriously doubt the "preliminary review of existing
conditions..." when you state "there is a substantial
'demand corridor' for pedestrian(s)..." at our location. We
do not know what constitute "substantial" demand but we are
conducting a videotaped observation of the boulevard to
determine the amount of actual traffic on both sides of the
street. We are going to tape this traffic from 6:30 A.M. to
dusk each day for about a week and then summarize the
traffic as to direction of travel, pedestrian or biker or
,logger, adult or youth, or bus riders. We will summarize
this data for each day and we are including the time of day.
It is our intention to share this information with you and
we will have some of it for Monday's meeting with the City
Council. (At the present time, our data suggests that the
"substantial demand" is far fewer than one person per hour).
The expense of the project is not the only reason that
causes us to reject the sidewalk idea.
We have made measurements of the boulevard and have
concluded that the path of the sidewalk must be quite
creative or we will lose several large plantings of trees.
Unless the city is prepared to move the power line poles,
• Carson's boulevard will likely lose two large trees,
Arvidson's and Olsen's will also likely lose important
plantings. Of these, the plantings at the Olsen house are
most extensive and would constitute a serious loss of value
if they were removed. These trees are self - planted elms
that have been allowed to grow into a large tree hedge to
help screen out road noise from Humboldt Avenue.
At the time of planning these houses, (Arvidson Addition),
Humboldt was not a busy street, did not directly line up
with itself on the Brooklyn Park side of 73rd, and we had no
idea that noise would eventually reach the levels it does on
Humboldt. This noise has reached a level that interferes
with conversations if windows are open and often has a
devastating effect on any outdoor gathering. Since the
Olsen home has a developed outdoor space with patios and a
pool, we feel that controlling noise on Humboldt is
essential and have consulted with the city on several
occasions for ideas to block the transmission of noise. To
that end, the mounds, fence, and growth of trees as a dense
hedge provides a significant reduction in noise. We would
strongly oppose any changes that increase the already
excessive noise levels.
A couple of years ago, when Highway 252 was being finished,
a local meeting was held at Evergreen School for citizens
concerned about the traffic on Humboldt. The focus at that
time was on the re- routed traffic from construction, but it
provided a forum for a general discussion about the future
of Humboldt and its role as a developing arterial highway.
The city planners who were present and the city manager
assured us that every effort would be made to keep the
traffic and further development of Humboldt to current
status and discourage any increases of use on Humboldt. We
who live on the street remember that meeting and
conversations very well. We are so concerned about the
traffic and development of Humboldt that we have considered
Forming a citizens' group of homeowners to meet regularly
and monitor problems as we see them in an organized manner
to press for reduction of pressure on Humboldt. It would
seem that such a group should be formed to protect our
interests if it is the city's intention to concentrate more
resources on development of the route.
Perhaps the greatest irritation, both from the standpoint of
noise pollution- and real damage to property, was the change
of the MTC bus route from Dupont to Humboldt Avenues. We
know that this is not a direct responsibility of the city,
but we would like some relief from this incessant intrusion
and house - shaking. We would propose a change in route for a
• few years to another street. (This would also eliminate the
traffic on the boulevard that prompted the complaint from
Carson's).
We also feel that the little pedestrian traffic that does
walk on the west boulevard needs to be directed to cross the
street at 73rd Avenue, or at the established cross -walks
controlled by school crossing guards. We would like to see
painted crossings at 73rd and perhaps more restricting signs
advising motorists to yield to pedestrians at these
locations. We would also like to see more enforcement of
the traffic laws at 73rd and controls on the speed of
traffic Humboldt. The current speed limit is often violated
and the stop signs are often ignored.
In conclusion, we feel that Humboldt Avenue is channeling a
level of motorized traffic that was never envisioned Cor at
least, never projected) at the time the houses were built.
While the extensions of sidewalks does not necessarily mean
the level of motorized traffic will increase, we feel that
any further development of the street and boulevards
encourages more traffic. We feel that the wear of the grass
on the boulevard would be brought to a controlled level by
moving the location of the MTC bus stop from its latest
location between 73rd and Woodbine, to its earlier locations
north of 73rd and south of Woodbine. If the bus riding
i traffic is eliminated by moving the bus stops, the remaining
boulevard traffic will be reduced to a level that makes it
ludicrous to waste the money on the sidewalk. Much of
Brooklyn Center has boulevards without sidewalks and we are
suggesting that this area should continue as it is.
We want the city to: 1) move the bus stops, 2) leave the
trees and shrubs in place, 3) establish a crossing on
Humboldt at 73rd, ` i) enforce the traffic laws strictly on
Humboldt to keep it safe, and S) permit no further
development of the street or boulevards, including the
sidewalk extension. We want the city to take an aggressive
stance and action to reduce, not increase, the amount of
traffic on Humboldt. If sidewalk work is to be done, we
want drastic reductions in the levels of noise pollution or
the establishment of sound abatement methods that will
result in sound levels consistent with the noise levels on
other streets in the area such as Emerson, or even Logan
Avenues. We feel that our properties are being unfairly
depreciated as a result of conditions on Humboldt and that
we are entitled to the same type of residential environment
enjoyed by others in Brooklyn Center. We do not want more
development, we would like to see Humboldt turned into a
cul -de -sac.
Sincerely,
A /e.y 0�—
David C. Olsen
cc Arvidson family
Carson family
City Manager
Z7 /5
a-3
zi
i
r
_
ri Cam.,
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 7/25/88
Agenda Item Numbe
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT AND ACCEPTING PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES FOR CIVIC CENTER SPACE NEEDS STUDY - PROJECT NO. 1988 -16 AND AMENDING THE
1988 GENERAL FUND PROJECT
DEPARTME PR A •�
Signature - ' le
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached X�
Attached please find a copy of a proposal from CMA Architects and Al Mjorud to conduct a space
needs study for the civic center area. Also included is a copy of a memorandum from Sy Knapp.
The specific charge of this analysis would be to develop a preliminary report on the space needs for
all city departmental functions in city hall and a similar analysis in the community center with
• special emphasis on a senior activity center and field house activities. It would also include cost
estimates and a conceptual plan.
The driving portion of this analysis is the senior activity center as this was recommended by the
Earle Brown Farm Committee and the Parks and Recreation Commission. Upon initial analysis, the
most logical location for this center would be as an addition or expansion of the existing community
center. This new addition then could use and draw on the existing facilities in the community center
and should further or additional expansion of that area occur, then the seniors would be in a position
to also take advantage of those facilities. Because adding one piece to the ° civic center complex
could affect any future expansion of any other portion, it makes good common sense to analyze the
future building and space needs of the civic center complex before considering adding any part.
Because the civic center site has significant "poor soil" areas, to get any kind of a reasonably
accurate cost estimate on building construction in this area, extensive soil borings are required. Our
proposal calls for approximately $5,600 in addition to the cost of the architectural analysis for soil
borings. With the $1,365 architectural cost, the total project cost amounts to $17,000.
RECOMMENDATION
We recommend passage of a resolution authorizing transfer of the necessary funds to cover the cost
of the architectural analysis and the soil borings for a civic center space needs analysis from the
contingency fund to government buildings, division 19 in the general fund budget, and authorize the
mayor and manager to sign the necessary contracts.
CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY
OF
B ROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
ENT TELEPHONE 561 -5440
C EN 1 �R EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE
911
TO: G.G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp
Director of Public Works
DATE: July 15, 1988
RE: Proposal to Provide Architectural Services for
Civic Center Space Needs Study
In accordance with requests from the City Council and staff discussions, we have
obtained a proposal from the architectural firm of Carlson Mjorud Architecture,
Ltd. (CMA) to conduct a needs study for the development of a Senior Center
Complex, a Field House /Athletic Facility, and an expansion of the City Hall to
accommodate existing and future space needs by the various departments and for
civic functions. A copy of that proposal dated May 26, 1988 is attached.
It is my belief that the proposal describes the work required to develop a
preliminary compilation of the City's needs and to evaluate the feasibility of
redesigning the Civic Center site so as to accommodate these needs.
Consideration would also be given, and decisions would need to be made, whether
the concentration of all of these facilities at the Civic Center site is
cost - effective in the long term as well as in the short term, or whether some
portion(s) of the currently- needed facilities should be located elsewhere.
The staff decision to request CMA to submit this proposal, and to recommend
acceptance of their proposal to the City Council is based on the fact that all
of our experiences with this firm have been excellent. We believe that they are
technically very competent and that they are very knowledgeable regarding the
type of activities which the proposed facilities would serve. Most importantly,
they have repeatedly demonstrated an excellent ability to communicate with City
staff so that there are "no surprises" after their initial studies are
completed.
It must be noted, however, that Mr. Al Mjorud, who has been the principal
contact person representing CMA on Brooklyn Center projects has recently sold
his interest in that firm and has opened a new practice under the title of
"Mjorud Architecture ". Under terms of their departure agreement, Mr. Mjorud is
not allowed to solicit business from current clients of CMA for a period of two
d roeeui- uueivan �
Page 2
July 15, 1988
years. However, because we believe it is vital to have Mr. Mjorud's involvement
in this proposed study, the attached proposal (at our request) provides that CMA
will employ Mr. Mjorud to act as their lead person for this study on a
consulting basis. The proposal further provides a basis for the City to employ
Mr. Mjorud directly for future phases of work regarding this project if that is
the City's wish. While we have some discomfort with this arrangement, we are
confident that the City would obtain an excellent conceptual design study if
this proposal is accepted.
Because the study would include analysis of sites within the Central Park area,
which are not immediately adjacent to the existing buildings, it will probably
be necessary to obtain extensive soil borings and soils engineering analyses to
allow CMA to evaluate the costs for soil correction or piling to allow various
facilities to be constructed. The results of these surveys will very probably
affect the economic feasibility of a number of alternative design concepts.
Accordingly, if the CMA proposal is accepted and approved, with a maximum fee of
$11,365, I recommend that the resolution appropriate a total of $17,000 to
provide funds for needed soil surveys. A resolution for that purpose is
provided for Council consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
Sy Knapp
Director of Public Works
Attachment
n .
T' I
Carlson Mjorud Architecture Ltd. 1000 Shelard Parkway
Minneapolis. Minnesota 55426
612/546 -3337
May 26, 1988
Mr. Sy Knapp
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Re: PROPOSAL OF SERVICES FOR
SPACE NEEDS STUDY - PHASE I
Dear Mr. Knapp:
Carlson Mjorud Architecture Ltd. (CMA) appreciates the opportunity to submit
a proposal to the City of Brooklyn Center for this First Phase of Architectural
Services for the Development of a Senior Center Complex, Field House /Athletic
Facility and the expansion of the City Hall.
The first phase of services we propose would be broken down into three
categories:
1. Formulate a Building Program of the desired facilities.
2. Analyze the Site's Suitability to accommodate these facilities.
3. Prepare a Cost Estimate of potential development costs.
An explanation of each category follows:
1. BUILDING PROGRAM
Formulate a Building Program of the desired spaces.
This involves collecting information from the City of Brooklyn Center
regarding types of rooms, equipment, lighting, number of users,
relationships of spaces; and a variety of other printed information
including soil tests, surveys, site plans, photos and existing athletic
fields. This information on new facilities will then be reduced to a
written description of the spaces including sizes and how they should
relate to each other. It would also include overall descriptions of
facility requirements, parking, and basic philosophies on the design of
these facilities.
Mr. Sy Knapp
May 26, 1988
Page Two
2. SITE SUITABILITY
Analyze the suitability of the existing site to accommodate all of the
proposed facilities identified in the Building Program.
This study will compare the building areas formulated in the Building
Program to the space available on the existing site. It will consider
such items as parking, preserved areas, soil suitability, and visual
impact. Existing soil test results would be used in the structural
analysis.
The study will include a diagrammatic comparison of different sized
building footprints at potential locations. This will result in information
indicating how single, two or multi -story buildings would have an
impact on the Civic Center site. Likewise it may also be necessary to
consider multi -level parking.
3. COST ESTIMATE
Estimate potential development cost.
Based on the results of the program and site study, an estimate of
possible development costs will be prepared. This estimate will include
fees, furnishings, equipment and construction costs. It will be broken
down to allow an evaluation of the major components of the project.
The architectural fees for the three categories are based on the work effort
listed below. The work would be billed on an hourly basis with the fee not to
exceed the Total Maximum Fee:
BUILDING PROGRAM
- Gather information, meet with Owner, analyze forms and data gathered.
- Prepare first draft of ram. Space Program.
g
- Second o d meetin
with Owner program. to refine
9
- Prepare conceptual cost estimate.
- Compile written text to explain program and philosophy.
- Type program, cost estimate and text.
- Meet with Owner to distribute draft of program.
- Modify program based on feedback.
- Presentation of final program.
Principal time: 26 hrs, x $85 = $2,210
Architectural time: 59 hrs. x $44 = 2,596
Clerical time: 11 hrs. x $37 = 407
Total $5,213
Mr. Sy Knapp
May 26, 1988
Page Three
SITE SUITABILITY
- Analyze existing site information to determine suitability of site to
accept program.
- Confirm Code and Ordinance limitations on site, verify limited use
areas, setbacks, possible heights of structure and traffic circulation.
- Have Structural Engineer analyze soil characteristics and suitability of
soil to receive building loads.
- Determine possible locations and configurations of facilities based on `
sizes determined from the program.
- Meet with Owner to review various options.
- Revise plans to meet Owner's needs.
- Prepare final plans.
- Prepare report summary.
- Presentation of plans to Owner.
Structural Engineer $ 400
Principal time: 14 hrs. x $85 = 1,190
Architectural time: 39 hrs, x $44 = 1,716
Clerical time: 2 hrs. x $37 = 74
Total $3,380
COST ESTIMATE
- From selected site configuration formulate estimated costs for all
portions of construction.
- Type draft of cost estimate.
- First meeting with Owner to review draft copy.
- Revise estimate to reflect Owner selected direction.
- Revise draft.
- Final presentation.
Principal time: 14 hrs, x $85 = $1 ,190
Architectural time: 40 hrs. x $44 = 1,760
Clerical time: 6 hrs. x $37 = 222
Total $3,172
FEE SUMMARY OF ALL COMPONENTS
Program $ 5,213
Site Suitability 3,380
Cost Estimate 3,172
Total Maximum Fee $11,365
Mr. Sy Knapp
May 26, 1988
Page Four
CHANGES TO THE WORK
The work in each step or category is based on information generated in the
previous category. Changes or additions occurring after incremental steps are
completed will incur additional fees based on hourly rates. There are
increments within each category which will be defined during the process.
KEY PERSONNEL
In response to your letter dated May 24, 1988, regarding a change in the
professional relationship between Al Mjorud and CMA, we genuinely recognize
and appreciate your concern. The City of Brooklyn Center is a valued client
to CMA as an organization and Al Mjorud individually: CMA fully intends to
maintain the high standards and services to Brooklyn Center which have been
set by Al Mjorud. In order to maintain a continuity and respond to your
concerns we propose the following:
a) For the work outlined in this proposal, CMA will engage Al Mjorud on a
consulting basis as the lead person. Eighty -five percent (850) of the
principal's time listed in this proposal is intended to be filled by Al. A
document stating Al Mjorud's availability is attched to this proposal.
b) If after the Phase I work described in this proposal the City feels that
CMA has performed to a lower standard of service than provided on
previous work, the City may inform CMA in writing of their dissat-
isfaction and then be free to engage Al Mjorud independent of CMA.
c) As with any project, the City has the option not to engage CMA for
additional work and seek new consultants. We hope this does not occur
but was listed in your letter.
We trust this proposal meets your expectations for the Space Needs Study -
Phase I and participation of key individuals. If there are any questions re-
garding this proposal, please do not hesitate to ask.
Sincerely,
CARLSON M 0 UD ARCHITECTURE LTD.
y� Approved by Brooklyn Center City Council:
Mi ael Montgom ry, IA Date: 1988
Accepted for the City of Brooklyn Center
Aij Id, AIA
By:
MM /AM: by Manager
Enclosures
and By:
City Manager
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT AND ACCEPTING PROPOSAL
TO PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR CIVIC CENTER SPACE
NEEDS STUDY - PROJECT NO. 1988 -16 AND AMENDING THE 1988
GENERAL FUND BUDGET
WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the City Council that a study needs to
be conducted to define the space needs for the development of a Senior Center
Complex, a Field House /Athletic Facility, and for expansion of the existing
City Hall to accommodate current and future office needs and needs for civic
functions; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has obtained a proposal from the firm of
Carlson Mjorud Architecture, Ltd. to conduct the needed study at a maximum total
fee of $11,365.00; and
WHEREAS, additional costs, specifically including soil borings and
soils engineering services will be required to allow proper evaluation of design
alternatives to be completed by the architect;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The following improvement project is hereby established:
Improvement Project No. 1988 -16
Civic Center Space Needs Study
2. A transfer in the amount of $17,000 is hereby authorized from the
Capital Projects Fund to the General Fund Government Buildings
Division 19 of Appropriation for the purpose of paying the costs
for architectural services and soils engineering services relating
to this proposed study.
3. The proposal submitted by Carlson Mjorud Architecture, Ltd. to
conduct the space needs study at a maximum fee of $11,365.00 is
hereby accepted. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized
and directed to execute an agreement for said services in that
amount.
Date Mayor
c
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 7/25/88
Agenda Item Numbe
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE
AND ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF SHADE TREES
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
DEPT. APPROVAL:
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report. Comments below /attached
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached NO
The attached resolution represents the official council action required to expedite
removal of the trees most recently marked by the city tree inspector in accordance with
the procedures outlined therein. It is anticipated that this resolution will be submitted
for council consideration each meeting during the summer and fall as new trees are marked.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the council adopt the attached resolution.
F 16-
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE
REMOVAL OF SHADE TREES (ORDER NO. DS 07/2 5/88)
WHEREAS, a Notice to Abate Nuisance and Shade Tree Removal
Agreement has been issued to the owners of certain properties in the City of
Brooklyn Center giving the owners twenty (20) days to remove shade trees
on the owners' property; and
WHEREAS, the City can expedite the removal of these shade trees by
declaring them a public nuisance:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. The shade trees at the following addresses are hereby declared
to be a public nuisance.
PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS TREE NUMBER
DAN WHITTENBURG 6926 DALLAS RD 194
AGNES BEIKLER 6435 BRYANT AVE N 195
EDWARD /NANCY STEWART 5836 EMERSON AVE N 196
FRITHJOF MOEN, JR 6938 BROOKLYN BLVD 197
FRITHJOF MOEN, JR 6938 BROOKLYN BLVD 198
GREGORY LUTGEN 7216 BROOKLYN BLVD 199
GENE /JANICE HOZEMPA 7235 NOBLE AVE N 200
GENE /JANICE HOZEMPA 7235 NOBLE AVE N 201
EILEEN KORLATH 6907 REGENT AVE N 202
RAYMOND SWANSON 6843 REGENT AVE N 203
WILLIAM SMITH 6413 TOLEDO AVE N 204
DAVID /ALMA TIMMERSMA 5318 ELEANOR LA 205
ALLEN /COLLEEN KUSHIN 6307 UNITY AVE N 206
WALTER STEENSON 5001 65TH AVE N 207
RAYMOND ECKHOFF 6400 PERRY AVE N 208
DAN /MARCIA BAKER 6225 NOBLE AVE N 209
MAX WELTON 6318 KYLE AVE N 210
THOMAS /EVA GRUE 6401 KYLE AVE N 211
ROY PETERSON 6418 INDIANA AVE N 212
ERIC /LORI POEHLER 4201 WINCHESTER LA 213
WELCOME COMM HOME 6451 BROOKLYN BLVD 214
META MILLER 5431 JAMES AVE N 215
OLIVIA WEINRICH 3500 69TH AVE N 216
KENNETH CAMPBELL 5603 JAMES AVE N 217
JAMES SARTELL 5506 IRVING AVE N 218
DAN PETERSON 5607 COLFAX AVE N 219
GARY LYONS 6807 HUMBOLDT AVE N 220
ROLLAND WALLACE 5529 BRYANT AVE N 221
WALLACE BERNARDS 5540 BRYANT AVE N 222
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 223
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 224
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 225
RESOLUTION NO.
PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS TREE NUMBER
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 226
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 227
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 228
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 229
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 230
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 231
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 232
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 233
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 234
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 235
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 236
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 237
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 238
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 239
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 240
CITY 6900 SHINGLE CRK PKW 241
WALTER WENHOLZ 501 69TH AVE N 242
OUTREACH COMM CTR 507 69TH AVE N 243
CITY GARDEN CITY PK 244
THOMAS SCHOMMER 6725 DREW AVE N 245
FRANCIS LACHANCE 6812 DREW AVE N 246
LAWRENCE EAVES 5919 HALIFAX AVE N 247
SCOTT DURANT 5924 HALIFAX AVE N 248
CHARLES REGAN 5937 HALIFAX AVE N 249
DALE WESSEN 6013 HALIFAX AVE N 250
RICHARD GARDNER 6018 HALIFAX AVE N 251
JOSEPHINE CHAMBERLAI 6031 HALIFAX AVE N 252
JOSEPHINE CHAMBERLAI 6031 HALIFAX AVE N 253
JAMES ORDNER 6039 HALIFAX AVE N 254
ANN STANCHFIELD 4013 61ST AVE N 255
JOHN GAGNON 4100 61ST AVE N 256
JAMES GROSS 6131 JUNE AVE N 257
ED /RUTH KOSCIOLEK 6312 GRIMES AVE N 258
CHARLES /PAT BEACH 3301 MUMFORD RD 259
DUDLEY LARSON 5936 ABBOTT AVE N 260
EDWARD EMPENGER 5907 ABBOTT AVE N 261
LORA PESHECK 3125 62ND AVE N 262
JOHN /MELANIE GILBERT 3412 62ND AVE N 263
CARL MUNSON 3413 62ND AVE N 264
STEVEN VILKS 6230 CHOWEN AVE N 265
MARK /TERRI IONE 5826 ALDRICH AVE N 266
DANIEL HUSBY 6519 CHOWEN AVE N 267
DAVID /PAM HOLCOMBE 3500 66TH AVE N 268
DAVID /PAM HOLCOMBE 3500 66TH AVE N 269
QUINN /PAT THOMPSON 6136 REGENT AVE N 270
CARL VICKROY 5019 61ST AVE N 271
HAROLD LOPPNOW 6117 LYNDALE AVE N 272
ETHEL HOLM 6127 LYNDALE AVE N 273
AQUA GEM ENTERPRIZE 2243 JUDY LA 274
EUGENE /WM HOFFMAN 5451 E TWIN LK BLVD 275
JAMES SCHULTE 5427 E TWIN LK BLVD 276
WM /LINDA BJERKE 3616 50TH AVE N 277
DAN /CAROL SCHUELLER 2318 ERICON DR 278
RESOLUTION NO.
PROPERTY OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS TREE NUMBER
HAROLD EVENSON 5136 FRANCE AVE N 279
2. After twenty 0 days y ( ) from the date of the notice, the property
owners will receive a second written notice that will give them
(5) business days in which to contest the determination of City
Council by requesting a hearing in writing. Said request shall be
filed with the City Clerk.
3. After five (5) days, if the property owner fails to request a
hearing, the tree(s) shall be removed by the City. `
4. All removal costs, includin g g g legal, financing and administrative
charges, shall be specially assessed against the property.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
YF, 0, h
CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY
OF
B ROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
TELEPHONE 561 -5440
EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE
C ENTER
911
s
TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
FROM: Joe Oster, Public Works Coordinator
DATE: July 20, 1988
RE: 1988 Special Assessment Levies
This memo provides summary information regarding the assessment levies being
recommended for adoption in 1988. The following information is submitted:
A. 1987 and 1988 Diseased Shade Tree Removal Costs - Levies 11067 and 11068:
Includes diseased shade tree removal costs to property owners who, (1) have
requested to have the costs assessed on the Notice to Abate Nuisance and
Diseased Shade Tree Removal Agreement, (2) have failed to pay removal costs
as agreed on the before mentioned agreement or, (3) have had trees removed
in accordance with the procedure established when a property owner fails to
respond to official notices, (i.e. the Public Nuisance Procedure). Charges
for tree removal include: (1) contract cost for tree removal (half of
contract cost for boulevard trees), (2) administrative fee ($40.00 per
tree), (3) interest cost ($10.00 per tree), and (4) special assessment fee
($25.00 per parcel).
The trees included in the 1988 levies are trees that were removed in 1987
after the deadline for special assessments in 1987 and those trees removed
in 1988 prior to the deadline for 1988 special assessments. The deadline
this year was July 15, 1988. Any trees removed after that date will be
specially assessed in 1989.
Levy 11067 is for special assessments amounting to $300.00 or less and is
paid over a three year period and 11068 is for special assessments greater
than $300.00 and is a five year special assessment.
B. Delinquent Public Utilities - Levy 11069:
Includes delinquent public utilities to properties where, as of July 1,
1988, public utility bills remain unpaid. Delinquent public utilities are
collected as one year assessments.
' 41 Ncx
C0 ��,..�
Page Two
July 20, 1988
C. Delinquent Weed Destruction Accounts - Levy 11070:
Includes delinquent weed destruction charges to properties who have
neglected to pay removal charges for weeds removed by order of the City
Weed Inspector.
D. Logan Avenue Street Improvement - Project Number 1988 -04 - Levy 11071
This project is currently being constructed and costs are estimated. It is
anticipated that the project will be completed by the time assessments are
levied and by including this project in the 1988 special assessments the
city will not have to include one year of capitalized interest to the
amount used to calculate the special assessment rates. This will reduce
the special assessments levied to the property owners. Costs included in
the calculation of the assessment rates are the bid cost of construction,
city engineering (12% of contract), administrative (1% of contract), legal
(1% of contract), right of way acquisition costs and contingency cost (5%
of contract) to cover unforeseen change orders resulting in increased
project costs. Three credits (pavement life credit, single frontage
credit, and storm sewer credit) were applied to the construction cost
reducing the cost used in calculating rates from $533,445 to $122,566.48.
Estimated As Bid
Contract $559,880 $448,281.75
Engineering 67,186 53,793.60
Administration 5,599 4,482.80
Legal 5,599 4,482.80
Capitalized Interest 27,996 22,414.05
Total Project $666,260 $533,455.00
The special assessments for this project have been determined on the basis
of benefit received to properties lying within the special assessment
zones. Total special assessments amount to $122,566.48. The rates applied
to the properties, based upon area square feet, are shown below.
Zone Estimated As Bid
A $0.3530 /square foot $0.34627 /square foot
B $0.1412 /square foot $0.13851 /square foot
C $1,325 /parcel $1,325 /parcel
D $649.80 /unit $649.80 /unit
The actual assessments to each parcel are detailed in appendix A.
D. France Avenue Area Street Improvements - Project Numbers 1988 -05, 1988 -06,
1988 -07 - Levy 11072
Page Three
July 20, 1988
This project is currently being constructed and costs are estimated. It is
anticipated that the project will be completed by the time assessments are
levied and b including this p roject in the 1988 special assessments the
Y g ro
P
J P
city will not have to include one year of capitalized interest to the
amount used to calculate the special assessment rates. This will reduce
the special assessments levied to the property owners. Costs included in
the calculation of the assessment rates are the bid cost of contruction,
city engineering (12% of contract), administrative (1% of contract), legal
(1% of contract), right of way acquisition costs and contingency cost (5%
of contract) to cover unforeseen change orders resulting in increased
project costs. Two credits (pavement life credit, and single frontage
credit) were applied to the construction cost reducing the cost used in
calculating rates from $572,598 to $367,617.90.
Estimated As Bid
Contract $730,090 $487,981.15
Engineering 87,604 58,557.22
Administration 7,301 4,879.81
Legal 7,301 4,879.81
Capitalized Interest 27,374 16,300.01
Total Project $859,670 $572,598.00
The special assessments for this J
ro"ect have been determined on the basis
P
of benefit received to properties lying within the special assessment
zones. Total special assessments amount to $367,617.90. The rates applied
to the properties, based upon area square feet, are shown below.
Zone Estimated As Bid
A $0.25110 /square foot $0.20867 /square foot
B $0.08878 /square foot $0.07377 /square foot
C $1,325 /parcel $1,325 /parcel
The actual assessments to each parcel are detailed in appendix B.
e pectfully submitted Approved for subulittal
A4.� '^
se � G. Oster K yy�na p
' Pub Works Coordinator Direct' of Public Works
0
LOGAN AVENUE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ASSESSMENT
ACTUAL AMOUNT
ZONE C ZONE D PROPOSED ESTIMATED
PROPERTY PROPERTY A ZONE B ZONE A ZONE B ZONE RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL TOTAL IN ENGINEER'S
ADDRESS STREET PID AREA AREA ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT REPORT
NO NUMBER - EVEST PRT 02- 118 -21 -13 -0025 14,930 32,704 $5,169.81 $4,529.83 $9,699.64 $9,934.07
NO NUMBER - NSP 02- 118 -21 -14 -0007 9,256 $3,205.08 $3,205.08 $3,299.34
1900 57th Ave N 02- 118 -21 -13 -0029 20,052 $6,943.41 $6,943.41 $7,147.62
5840 Lilac Drive No 02- 118 -21 -14 -0019 32,332 $11,195.60 $11,195.60 $11,524.88
5800 Logan Ave N 02- 118 -21 -14 -0025 51,210 - $17,732.49 $17,732.49 $18,254.02
c
5710 Morgan Ave N 02- 118 -21 -13 -0026 19,763 77,361 $6,843.33 $10,715.27 $17,558.60 $17,954.74 ._
5712 Morgan Ave N 02- 118 -21 -13 -0024 103,346 81,385 $35,785.62 $11,272.64 $47,058.26 $48,315.77
5716 Logan Ave N 02- 118 -21 -14 -0107 3,965 $649.80 $649.80 $649.80
.5744 Logan Ave N 02- 118 -21 -14 -0100 3,965
$649.80 $649.80 $649.80
5724 Logan Ave N 02- 118 -21 -14 -0105 4,455 $649.80 $649.80 $649.80
5720 Logan Ave N 02- 118 721 -14 -0106 4,455 $649.80 $649.80 $649.80
5728 Logan Ave N 02- 118 -21 -14 -0104 4,455 $649.80 $649.80 $649.80
5732 Logan Ave N 02- 118 -21 -14 -0103 4,455 $649.80 $649.80 $649.80
5740 Logan Ave N 02- 118 -21 -14 -0101 4,455 $649.80 $649.80 $649.80
5736 Logan Ave N 02-118 -21 -14 -0102 4,455 $649.80 $649.80 $649.80
1808 57th Ave N 02- 118 -21 -14 -0004 9,917 $1,325.00 $1,325.00 $1,325.00
5712 Logan Ave N 02- 118 -21 -14 -0006 9,917 $1,325.00 $1,325.00 $1,325.00
5706 Logan Ave N 02- 118 -21 -14 -0002 9,917 $1,325.00 $1,325.00 $1,325.00
LOGAN TOTAL 315,300 191,450 $86,875.34 $26,517.74 $3,975.00 $5,198.40 $122,566.48 $125,603.84
0 1
Note! This represents I LOGAN AVENUE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
as bid cost for
the Logan Avenue I ZONE A ASSESSMENTS $86,875.34
Project. I ZONE B ASSESSMENTS $26,517.74 '
ZONE C RESIDENTIAL USE CREDIT (SINGLE FAMILY) $3,975.00
ZONE D RESIDENTIAL USE CREDIT (TOWNROMES) $5,198.40
TOTAL ASSESSMENTS $122,566.48
APPENDIX A
•
FRANCE AVENUE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ASSESSMENT
ACTUAL AMOUNT
PROPOSED ESTIMATED
PROPERTY PROPERTY A ZONE B ZONE A ZONE B ZONE C ZONE TOTAL IN ENGINEER'S
ADDRESS STREET PID AREA AREA ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT REPORT
3725 47th Ave N 10- 118 -21 -42 -0024 30,524 $6,369.44 $6,369.44 $7,664.73
3707 50th Ave N 10- 118 -21 -13 -0062 15,000 $3,130.05 $3_,130.05 $3,766.57
3715 50th Ave N 10- 118 -21 -13 -0063 16,636 $3,471.43 $3,471.43 $4,177.38
3721 50th Ave N 10- 118 -21 -13 -0064 13,364 $2,788.67 $2,788.67 $3,355.77
3616 50th Ave N 10- 118 -21 -13 -0051 20,250 $4,225.57 $4,225.57 $5,084.88
3607 50th Ave N 10- 118 -21 -13 -0059 21,800 $4,549.01 $4,549.01 $5,474.09
3615 50th Ave N 10- 118 -21 -13 -0060 15,000 $3,130.05 $3,130.05 $3,766.57
3701 50th Ave N 10- 118 -21 -13 -0061 15,000 $3,130.05 $3,130.05 $3,766.57
5001 Drew Ave N 10- 118 -21 -13 -0003 20,250 $4,225.57 $4,225.57 $5,084.88
5001 Ewing Ave N 10 118 -21 -13 -0042 19,954 $4,163.80 $4,163.80 $5,010.55
4748 France Ave N 10- 118 -21 -42 -0007 26,279 60,963 $5,483.64 $4,497.24 $9,980.88 $12,010.77
4911 France Ave N 10 -118- 21-24 -0003 91,000 172,000 $18,988.97 $12,688.44 $31,677.41 $38,119.82
4906 France Ave N 10- 118 -21 -13 -0066 18,000 11,497 $3,756.06 $848.13 $4,604.19 $5,540.54
4900 France Ave N 10 118 -21 -13 -0067 6,555 $1,367.83 $1,367.83 $1,645.99
4902 France Ave N 10 118 - 21 -13 -0068 17,735 6,967 $3,700.76 $513.96 $4,214.72 $5,071.84
5001 France Ave N 10- 118 -21 -24 -0002 36,600 147,681 $7,637.32 $10,894.43 $18,531.75 $22,300.81
5000 France Ave N 10- 118 -21 -13 -0006 19,954 $4,163.80 $4,163.80 $5,010.55
4837 France Ave N 10 118 -21 -23 -0004 22,000 1,561,842 $4,590.74 $115,217.08 $119,807.82 $144,176.68
4825 France Ave N 10- 118 -21 -31 -0027 81,883 24,000 $17,086.53 $1,770.48 $18,857.01 $22,691.83
4912 France Ave N 10- 118 -21 -13 -0065 18,000 16,884 $3,756.06 $1,245.53 $5,001.59 $6,018.77
4715 France Ave N 10- 118 -21 -31 -0015 14,000 14,182 $2,921.38 $1,046.21 $3,967.59 $4,774.48
4010 Lakebreeze Ave 10- 118 -21 -31 -0008 88,994 61,285 $18,570.38 $4,520.99 $23,091.37 $27,787.41
3650 Lakebreeze Ave 10- 118 -21 -31 -0028 67,206 47,161 $14,023.88 $3,479.07 $17,502.95 $21,062.47
3901 Lakebreeze Ave 10- 118 -21 -31 -0024 50,911 30,144 $10,623.60 $2,223.72 $12,847.32 $15,460.04
4001 Lakebreeze Ave 10- 118 -21 -31 -0029 105,456 216,373 $22,005.50 $15,961.84 $37,967.34 $45,689.02
4800 Lilac Drive N 10- 118 -21 -42 -0002 147,427 $10,875.69 $10,875.69 $13,087.82
4639 France Ave N 10- 118 -21 -31 -0004 22,000 22,286 $1,325.00 $1,325.00 $1,325.00
4645 France Ave N 10- 118 -21 -31 -0016 17,200 17,423 $1,325.00 $1,325.00 $1,325.00
4629 France Ave N 10- 118 -21 -31 -0005 20,000 20,260 $1,325.00 $1,325.00 $1,325.00
FRANCE TOTAL 911,551 2,578,375 $177,860.09 $185,782.81 $3,975.00 $367,617.90 $441,575.83
NOTE: COST DETAILED IN
THIS SPREADSHEET I FRANCE AVENUE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
REPRESENT AS BID
CONSTRUCTION COSTS. I ZONE A ASSESSMENTS $177,860.09
ZONE B ASSESSMENTS $185,782.81
ZONE C RESIDENTIAL USE CREDIT (SINGLE FAMILY) $3,975.00
TOTAL ASSESSMENTS $367,617.90
APPENDIX B
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 7/25/88
Agenda Item Numbe
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
® ITEM DESCRIPTION:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR DISEASED SHADE TREE
REMOVAL COSTS, DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY ACCOUNTS, AND DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL
ACCOUNTS
DEPT. APPROVAL:
SY KNAPP DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WO
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes )
The purpose of this resolution is to order a public hearing on Tuesday
September 6, 1988, at 8 P.M., local time, to hear and pass upon all objections,
0 if any, to the proposed special assessments for diseased shade tree removal
costs, delinquent public utility accounts, and delinquent weed removal
accounts.
All diseased trees have been declared a public nuisance in past City Council
resolutions and the trees have been removed by the City Tree Contractor in
accordance with the established policy.
Delinquent public utilities account property owners have received notice of
q P P P
delinquent account in accordance with the established collection policy and
have not made payment.
Delinquent weed destruction account property ert
q P P Y owners have received notice of
delinquent account in accordance with the established collection policy and
have not made payment.
Future council actions include the public hearing at the specified date and
adoption of the resolutions to certify the special assessment levy role with
the Hennepin pin C unty Auditor.
Recommendation
It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to
hold public hearing on these special assessments.
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
U r
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS
FOR DISEASED SHADE TREE REMOVAL COSTS, DELINQUENT PUBLIC
UTILITY ACCOUNTS, AND DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL ACCOUNTS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, that:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 6th day of September, 1988 in the <
City Hall at 8 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessments for
the following charges:
Diseased Shade Tree Removal Costs
Delinquent Public Utility Account
Delinquent Weed Destruction Account
2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall
forthwith prepare ;assessment rolls for the above charges, and
shall keep them on file and open to inspection by any interested
persons.
3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing.
4. The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner
of each parcel described in such assessment rolls not less than
two weeks prior to the hearing.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
-----------------------------------------------
7/15/88
PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
-- ---- ------ - --- --- ----------------
Improvement Project No.: 1987 -06 & 1988 -11 Levy No.: 11067
Description: Cost of diseased shade tree removal to Fund /Code No.: 17 -023
those tracts or parcels where trees were
removed during 1987 or 1988, by written Levy Description: TREE REMOVAL 87 -3
agreement with the property owner or by
order of the City Tree Inspector at a cost
of $300 or less.
Location: Various City Locations Levy runs three (3) years with interest at the
rate of ten percent (10 %).
Improvement Hearing Date: N/A
First payment, with property taxes payable in
Improvement Ordered on: N/A 1989 shalt include fifteen (15) whole months interest.
by Resolution No.: N/A Date of Assessment Hearing: September 6, 1988
Assessment District: N/A Adopted on:
by Resolution No.:
Method of Apportionment: Direct cost, interest and administrative Corrections, Deletions or Deferments:
costs assessed
Cost Summary
from Resolution No.:
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST:
Less Direct City Share:
(Fund M.S.A.)
Less Other Payments:
TOTAL ASSESSED: $3,102.95
City Property:
Other Public Property:
Private Property: $3,102.95
s 0
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DISEASED TREE REMOVALS PAGE 1 OF 2
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 3 YEAR LEVY 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification
LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address I Name Name 1
I NO. I NO. (IDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL 1 Addition /Legal Description 1 Mailing Address 1 Mailing Address 1
111067 1 101-118-21-21-0002 1 89295 1 $163.50 15959 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH ICATHERINE G BENSON 1 1
ILOT 1, BLOCK 2 15959 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH
I 1 I I (CAMDEN ACRES 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
111067 1 101- 118 -21-21-0027 1 89285 1 $173.90 15930 ALDRICH AVENUE NORTH 1MICHAEL J & JANE M OVERMAN 1 1
IL2, B1, FRANK BURCHS ADDITION & 5930 ALDRICH AVENUE NORTH
!I 1 1W 50' OF L4, B2, CAMDEN ACRES (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
1 11067 1 1 01-118 -21 -21 -0044 ' 89285 $295.00 5940 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH IBODO F & SHARI A STEINKE
1 1 I 1 (LOT 15, BLOCK 2 15940 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH 1 1
1 1 I I ( FRANK BURCH'S ADDITION ( B ROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I 1
111067 1 101-118 -21- 22-0089 1 89622 1 $131.00 16026 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH IBARBAHUMBOLDTZAVENUEENORTH I 1
LOT 13
1 1 I I 1 1EDWIN E NELSON'S 3RD ADDITION 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
111067 1 101- 118-21- 24 -0107 1 89560 1 $293.30 15835 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH 1ROGER J DUNN 1 1
PART OF LOT 25 5835 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH
1 I 1 1 1 1LYNDALE RIVERSIDE ACRES 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I 1
111067 1 101- 118 - 21-33-0035 1 89365 1 $224.30 15423 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH GLORIA J 1 1
LOTS 4 & 5, BLOCK 1
I1 1 1 1FAIRHAVEN PARK 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
111067 1 101- 118 -21- 43-0064 1 89225 1 $292.50 15333 OF 4TH
LOTSTREET NORTH I5333RM 47HPATRICIA
NORTH I 1
1 1 1 1 1 1BELLVUE ACRES 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
111067 1 102- 118-21-34 -0058 1 89686 1 $249.00 15321 PENN AVENUE NORTH 1JAMES B & JANET M ELMQUIST 1 1
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 5321 PENN AVENUE NORTH
1 I 1 1 1QUEEN ADDITION 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
111067 1 102- 118-21-42 -0059 1 90001 1 $104.50 12107 ERICON DRIVE FRANCES P 1 1
LOT 4, BLOCK 1
1 1 I 1 1 1RYDEN'S SECOND ADDITION 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
1 11067 1 102- 118 - 21-22-0054 1 89441 1 $227.00 159422VINCENT 6, AVENUE NORTH MAHDEA I
1 1 1 1 1 1HIPP'S 4TH ADDITION 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
1 11067 1 103-118 -21- 13-0085 1 89667 1 $216.50 158306ADMIRAL LANE 1DIANEADMIRALHLANE I 1 , BLOCK
1-1-1 I 1 1PEARS0N'S NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 1
I
i • 0
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DISEASED TREE REMOVALS PAGE 2 OF 2
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 3 YEAR LEVY 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER I Additional Notification
' LEVY IPROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address Name Name
I NO. I NO. (IDENTIFICATION NO.I NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address I Mailing Address !
111067 1 103-118- 21-11-0067 1 89440 1 $205.00 159001BEARD AVE NORTH I BEARD
CHARLES A AVENUE NORTH
I IHIPP'S 3RD ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 I
111067 1 103- 118-21-24 -0081 1 89667 1 $225.00 1388063 - 58THAVENUE NORTH PERRY
AVENUE MILLER NORTH
II I 1PEARSON' NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 I I
I 11067 I 14734 TWIN LAKE AVENUE RICHARD BECHT /ELIZABETH ARMSTRONG
I I 10-118- 21-32 -0039 89495 I $173.90 ILOT 10, BLOCK 3 14734 TWIN LAKE AVENUE I I
I LAKEBREEZE ADDITION ( B ROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429
111067 1 126 - 119-21-41 -0107 1 89784 1 $236.20 11711 - 73RD AVENUE NORTH 1THOMAS G & KAROLE A WILLIAMS I i
TRACT J 1711 - 73RD AVENUE NORTH
II I I I ( REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1409 (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I I
11067 33-119 -21- 11-0036 1 89570 $138.50 6800 PERRY AVENUE NORTH RODNEY J ROYALTY
(LOT 8, BLOCK 1 16800 PERRY AVENUE NORTH I i
I I IMARSTAN PLACE IBRROKLYN CENTER, MN 55429
11067 33- 119 - 21-42 -0124 1 89343 $114.75 5206 - 63RD AVENUE NORTH DOUGLAS HENTGES
I ILOT 19, BLOCK 5 15206 - 63RD AVENUE NORTH I i
I I IDONNAY'S BROOK LYN GARDENS 2ND ADDNIBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429
1 11067 1 133-119- 21-42 -0115 1 89343 1 $131.00 163181UNIBLOCKENUE NORTH 16318 UN &TY ANORTHAZ I I
II I I I IDONNAY'S BROOK LYN GARDENS 2ND ADDNIBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1
111067 1 136- 119 -21 -41 -0004 1 89036 I $140.50 16408 WILLOW LANE NORTH IRODNEY L SNYDER
UNPLATTED SECTION 36 16408 WILLOW LANE NORTH
II I I I 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
I I I I I i I I I
$3,102.95
, n
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
-----------------------------------------------
7/15/88
PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No.: 1987-06 & 1988 -11 Levy No.: 11068
Description: Cost of diseased shade tree removal to Fund /Code No.: 17 -024
those tracts or parcels where trees were
removed during 1987 or 1988, by written Levy Description: TREE REMOVAL 87 -5
agreement with the property owner or by
order of the City Tree Inspector at a cost
of more than $300.
Location: Various City Locations Levy runs five (5) years with interest at the
rate of ten percent (10 %).
Improvement Hearing Date: N/A �
First payment, with property taxes payable in
Improvement Ordered on: N/A 1989 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest.
by Resolution No.: N/A Date of Assessment Hearing: September 6, 1988
Assessment District: N/A Adopted on:
by Resolution No.:
Method of Apportionment: Direct cost, interest and administrative Corrections, Deletions or Deferments:
costs assessed
Cost Summary
from Resolution No.:
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST:
Less Direct City Share:
(Fund M.S.A.)
Less Other Payments:
TOTAL ASSESSED: $3,332.50
City Property:
Other Public Property:
Private Property: $3,332.50
n
! 0 !
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DISEASED TREE REMOVALS PAGE 1 OF 1
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 5 YEAR LEVY 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification
LEVY (PROJECT PROPERTY I ADDN. TOTAL I Address I Name Name
I NO. I NO. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address I Mailing Address I
11068 5812 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH TERRY L & LINDA J MCCULLOUGH
I I I 01- 118 -21 - 13 -0038 89560 I $555.00 1 PART OF LOT 16 & LOT 19 45812 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH I I
II I I ILYNDALE RIVERSIDE ACRES (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
11068 01-118-21-31-0061 89385 $340.00
I I I I 15500 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH 1HERBERT A ZWIRN
PART OF LOT 46 45900 - 3RD STREET NE 1
II I I I IGARCELONIS ADDITION TO MPLS IFRIDLEY, MN 55432
111068 1 101- 118-21- 31-0150 1 02331 1 $511.50 1806 - 55TH AVENUE NORTH I0 55TH
DDARRLENW NORTH IC THE /0 ESTAT D ARLEN ELW ALTER
ILOT IMADSEN FLORAL ADDITION [BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 4806 - 55TH AVENUE NORTH 1
IBROKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
11068 1 03- 118 -21 -24 -0077 89667 $418.50 15809 PEARSON DRIVE 4ARLEN STREHLO
I [LOT 33, BLOCK 6 15809 PEARSON DRIVE 1
II I IPEARSON'S NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 I
111068 1 110- 118-21- 21-0018 1 90080 1 $375.00 15230 GREAT VIEW AVENUE 1EMIL V ANDRES I
PART OF LOT 6 & LOT 7, BLOCK 1 5230 GREAT VIEW AVENUE
1 TWIN LAKE WOODS ADDITION 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 I 1
111068 1 127- 119 -21-33 -0097 1 03111 4 $485.00 17100 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 1ARDEN HILL PROPERTIES 1 I
i LOT 1, BLOCK 1 4926 IDS CENTER
II I 1 I 17100 CORPORATE PLAZA 2ND ADDITION IMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 I 1
1 11068 I 127-119-21-42-0026 1 89662 I $302.50 171243 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH IB ENJA FRANCE VELMA SUNORTHA I
II I IPALMER LAKE TERRACE 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 I
111068 1 128- 119-21-44-0015 1 89605 1 $345.00 17055 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 1COLLEEN FAYE MULLEN 1 I
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 7055 PERRY AVENUE NORTH
(MILLER'S WILLOW LANE 1ST ADDITION 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
$3,332.50
0
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
-----------------------------------------------
7/15/88
PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No.: N/A Levy No.: 11069
Description: Delinquent Public Utility Charges Fund /Code No.: 72-109
Levy Description: DELINQUENT PUB UTIL 87
Levy runs one (1) year with interest at the rate
Location: Various City Locations of ten percent (10 %).
Improvement Hearing Date: N/A First payment, with property taxes payable in
1989 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest.
Improvement Ordered on: N/A
Date of Assessment Hearing: September 6, 1988
by Resolution No.: N/A
Adopted on:
Assessment District: N/A
by Resolution No.:
Corrections, Deletions or Deferments:
Method of Apportionment: Direct Costs Assessed
Cost Summary
from Resolution No.:
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST:
Less Direct City Share:
(Fund M.S.A.)
Less Other Payments:
TOTAL ASSESSED: $472.40
City Property:
Other Public Property:
Private Property: $472.40
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DELIQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY ACCOUNTS PAGE 1 OF 1
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 1 YEAR LEVY 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification
LEVY (PROJECT PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address ' Name Name
NO. I NO. JIDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description i Mailing Address i Mailing Address
111069 I I 101- 118 -21 -42 -0008 1 89385 I $50.98 15530 LYNDALE AVENUE NORTH HEDBERG NORTH
IGARCELONIS ADDITION TO MINNEAPOLIS (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
I
(11069 I 101- 118 - 21-42-0009 89385 I $134.39 1 ` 5524 LYNDALE AVENUE NORTH II12615SUBURBAN
COUNTYNRREGIONAL PARK DIST
! I (LOT 10
I I 1 1 IGARCELONIS ADDITION TO MINNEAPOLIS 1PLYMOUTH, MN 55441
111069 102-118-21-44-0133 1 89961 1 $134.39 1 5419 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH ILAWRENCE MICKELSON
l 1 1 `LOT 2, BLOCK 1 15419 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH i 1
I I [ROCKWELL'S SECOND ADDITION ISROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1
11069 I 135-119 -21- 11-0024 1 00911 1 $152.64 16777 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH 1 DAVID C & TERRY SAXTON 1
1 I ILOT 8, BLOCK 1 13475 - 2ND STREET NE
IHUMBOLDT SQUARE ESTATES (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418
1 1 1 I I I I I I I
$472.40
I
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
7/15/88
I
PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
------ ------- ------ --------------- -
Improvement Project No.: N/A Levy No.: 11070
Description: Weed Removal Costs Fund /Code No.; 01 -024
Levy Description: WEED DESTRUCTION 87
Levy runs one (1) year with interest at the rate
Location: Various City Locations of ten percent (10 %).
Improvement Hearing Date: N/A First payment, with property taxes payable in
1989 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest.
Improvement Ordered on: N/A
Date of Assessment Hearing: September 6, 1988
by Resolution No.: N/A
Adopted on:
Assessment District: N/A
by Resolution No.:
Corrections, Deletions or Deferments:
Method of Apportionment: Direct Costs Assessed
i
Cost Summary
from Resolution No.:
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST:
Less Direct City Share:
(Fund M.S.A.)
Less Other Payments:
TOTAL ASSESSED: $1,843.75
City Property:
Other Public Property:
Private Property: $1,843.75
0 0 0
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL ACCOUNTS PAGE 1 OF 4
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 1 YEAR LEVY 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification
LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address I Name Name 1
I NO. 1 NO. (IDENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address I Mailing Address 1
1 11070 01-118-21-21-0109 89763 $68.75 15927 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH KENTON R & NANCY E LUNDGREN
1 1 1 ( TRACT J 15927 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH 1 1
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1271 BROOKLYN CENTER MN 55430
1 11070 1 101- 118 - 21-34-0083 1 89225 I $62.50 1 5300 COLFAX AVENUE NORTH ( ROGER P & SUSAN M ARNESON I 1
1 I 1 (PART OF LOT 10, BLOCK 4 15300 COLFAX AVENUE NORTH 1 1
1 1 1 I 1BELLVUE ACRES (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 I
111070 1 101- 118-21 -34 -0100 1 89225 $130.00 15345 COLFAX AVENUE NORTH SHARON K MULFORD 1 1
PART OF LOT 15, BLOCK 4 15345 COLFAX AVENUE NORTH
1 1 1 1 1 IBELLVUE ACRES (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
111070 1 102- 118-21-11-0006 1 89791 1 $115.00 IVACANT LAND 1 RFI CHIGHLAOOKROADW PARTNERSHIP 1 1
TRACT A
1 1 1 I (REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1458 1PONTIAC, MI 48054 1 1
1 11070 1 102-118-21 -13 -0028 1 00203 1 $55.00 1 1912 5, 57TH A NORTH EVEST LTD. 206 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 INORTHBROOK CENTER ADDITION (DALLAS, TX 75244 1 1
111070 1 103- 118 -21- 22-0036 1 89611 1 $77.50 (VACANT LAND 1STATE OF MINNESOTA I 1
OUTLOT D
1 1 1 1 1 1MOORWOOD TOWNHOUSES 1 1 1
111070 1 110-118 -21- 12-0051 89540 1 $95.00 15126 DREW AVENUE NORTH 1LOUISE C BERGEE 1 1
LOT 7, BLOCK 4 5126 DREW AVENUE NORTH
1 1 1 1 1LINDEN SHORES ON TWIN LAKE (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 I
1 11070 1 110-118- 21-23-0002 1 89010 1 $40.00 IVACANT 10 (TAX STA - LO /S LINE RR CO 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 1 1
111070 1 110-118-21-24-0001 1 89010 1 $40.00 IVACANT LAND 1TRI STATE LAND CO /SOO LINE RR CO 1 1
JUNPLATTED SECTION 10 TAX DEPT - SOO LINE BUILDING
1 1 1 1 1 1 (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 1 1
111070 1 110-118- 21-32-0010 1 89345 1 $60.00 (VACANT LAND (WILLIAM E & NANCY G DAHLQUIST 1JEROME L FISCHER 1
LOT 3, BLOCK 1 4704 LAKEVIEW AVENUE NORTH 2516 DAYBREAK DRIVE
1 1 1 1 1DOVER'S LAKEVIEW ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1DALLAS, TX 75252 -3032 1
111070 1 125- 119-21 -41 -0020 1 89639 1 $125.00 17109 WILLOW LANE NORTH IMARION E CARLSON 1 1
LOT 4, BLOCK 3 17109 WILLOW LANE NORTH
1 1 I I 1NORTH RIVER ESTATES 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 I 1
9 0 0
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL ACCOUNTS PAGE 2 OF 4
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 1 YEAR LEVY 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification
LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address I Name I Name
I NO. I NO. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. I PRINCIPAL I Addition /Legal Description 1 Mailing Address 1 Mailing Address 1
1 90062
11070 126- 119-21- 44-0079 $62.50 1708 - 69TH AVENUE NORTH (DAVID & WENDY LONGEN 1 1
I I I ILOT 2, BLOCK 2 11708 - 69TH AVENUE NORTH
1 1 I I I ITISCH'S ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 I 1
(11070 I `27-119- 21-43-0011 1 89662 I $60.00 16930 DREW AVENUE NORTH JERIC E JACOBSON /THERESA M CARLSON I
I I16930
BROOK
LOT 19, BLOCK 1 IDLYN CENTER, MN 55429
WRTH
I PALMER LAKE TERRACE I 1 1
1 11070 1 1 28-119 -21- 41-0128 89505 $55.00 4818 - 71ST AVENUE NORTH GREGORY J & KAPI RICHTER
1 1 1 (LOT 3, BLOCK 1 14818 - 71ST AVENUE NORTH I i
I LANG ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 1
11070 1 128 -119- 21-43-0057 1 90059 $55.00
1 1 1 1 1 (VACANT LAND THE PONDS ASSOCIATION
LOT 11, BLOCK 1 IPO BOX 29496 1 1
1 ITHE PONDS (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 1
1 11070 1 1 1 13313 - 68TH AVENUE NORTH ISTEPHEN M & DEBRA A GILMORE
1 1 34- 119 - 21-11-0056 1 89355 1 $60.00 ILOT 3, BLOCK 4 13313 - 68TH AVENUE NORTH 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 IELSENIS CITY VIEW (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 1
111070 1 134- 119 -21- 11-0076 1 89356 1 $62.50 (VACANT LAND (KEVIN P SMITH I 1
LOT 5, BLOCK 3 5637 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD, #107
1 1 1 1 1 1ELSENIS CITY VIEW 2ND ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 1
111070 1 134- 119-21- 13-0009 1 89100 1 $60.00 16520 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 1PHYLLIS ANN PLUMMER 1 1
PART OF LOT 8 6520 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD
1 1 1 1 1 1AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 25 (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 i
1 11070 1 134- 119 -21-24-0032 1 89635 1 $60.00 1 40 01 1, 66TH AVENUE NORTH (4612 ESTERKI AVENUE SOUTH I 1
1 1 I 1 1 1 NORTHGATE ADDITION (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55409 1 1
111070 1 135-119 -21 -22 -0012 1 01318 1 $100.00 IVACANT LAND (SHINGLE CREEK LAND COMPANY 1 1
ILOT 1, BLOCK 1 625 - 4TH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1550
1 1 1 1 1 1EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 1ST ADDN (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415
111070 1 135-119- 21-23-0002 1 89779 1 $115.00 IVACANT LAND (SHINGLE CREEK LAND COMPANY I
TRACT B (EXCEPT HIGHWAY) 625 - 4TH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1550
1 REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1377 (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 1 i
111070 1 135-119-21-24-0003 1 89779 ( $100.00 IVACANT LAND (SHINGLE CREEK LAND COMPANY I
ITRACT C 625 - 4TH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1550 I
1 1 1 1 1 iREGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1377 (MINNEAPOLIS, MH 55415 1 1
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL ACCOUNTS PAGE 3 OF 4
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 1 YEAR LEVY 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification
LEVY IPROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL I Address 1 Name Name
1 NO. I NO. (IDENTIFICATION NO.I NO. I PRINCIPAL 1 Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address 1 Mailing Address
111070 1 135-119- 21-41 -0009 1 02965 1 $92.50 (VACANT LAND (SHINGLE CREEK LAND COMPANY I 1
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 625 - 4TH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1550
IRICHARDSON ADDITION MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415
1 111070 1 135 - 119 -21 -41 -0011 1 02965 I $92.50 I VACANT LAND ( SHINGLE CREEK LAND COMPANY 1
1 1 1 I (LOT 3, BLOCK 1 1625 - 4TH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1550 1 1
1 1 I 1 I IRICHARDSON ADDITION 1MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 1
111070 1 135-119 -21 -41 -0012 1 02965 1 $92.50 (VACANT LAND 1SHINGLE CREEK LAND COMPANY 1 1
LOT 4, BLOCK 1 625 - 4TH AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 1550
1 1 1 1 1 1RICHARDSON ADDITION 1MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 I 1
1 11070 1 135- 119 -21 -41 -0013 1 02965 1 $92.50 ILOT BLOCK 1 1625 CREEK LAND COM' P A SUITE 1550 I 1
1 I 1 1 I IRICHARDSON ADDITION 1MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 i 1
111070 1 136- 119 -21 -12 -0049 1 89423 1 $70.00 16836 WEST RIVER ROAD 1USALDO RAMOS 1 1
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 6836 WEST RIVER ROAD
1 I 1 1 1GROSSER ADDITION (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1
111070 1 136- 119 - 21-13 -0031 1 89720 1 $100.42 IVACANT LAND 1MARVIN H & BETTY NELSON 1
PART OF TRACT D 104 DORADO COURT
I1 1 I 1 1REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 678 (PLANT CITY, FL 33566
111070 1 136- 119 - 21-13-0032 1 89720 1 $100.42 IVACANT LAND 1MARVIN H & BETTY NELSON 1
TRACT E 104 DORADO COURT
1 1 1 I I (REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 678 (PLANT CITY, FL 33566 I 1
111070 I 136 119 13 -0033 1 89720 1 $100.41 IVACANT LAND IMARVIN H & BETTY NELSON 1 1
TRACT F 104 DORADO COURT
1 1 1 1 1REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 678 (PLANT CITY, FL 33566 1
111070 I 136-119-21- 13-0078 1 90017 I $85.00 LAND RCE
2, BLOCK 1 15217 BOULEVARD, SUITE
1 1 1 I 1 1SHOPPERS ADDITION ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 i 1
111070 I 136-119-21-41-0007 1 89036 1 $86.25 16354 WILLOW LANE NORTH 1ANDRE A & CYNTHIA L BLANC
UNPLATTED SECTION 36 6354 WILLOW LANE NORTH
II I 1 I I 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430
1 11070 1 136- 119-21-42-0013 1 89564 1 $60.00 164 LANE NORTH 127355 -LUND CONSTRUCTION, INC 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 ILYN -RIVER ADDITION 1ANOKA, MN 55303 1 1
0 0 0
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL ACCOUNTS PAGE 4 OF 4
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 1 YEAR LEVY 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification
LEVY (PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL I Address I Name I Name 1
I NO. NO. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. 1 PRINCIPAL 1 Addition /Legal Description 1 Mailing Address 1 Mailing Address 1
111070 1 136-119 -21- 42-0016 01417 I $86.25 16357 NORTH LILAC DRIVE LYNBROO
NORTH
LOT 2, BLOCK 1
I 1LYNBROOK BOWL ADDITION .GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 1
1 1 11070 1 136 -119- 21-42-0017 01417 $150.00 VACANT LAND I MARVIN H & BETTY NELSON
I I 1 ILOT 3, BLOCK 1 1104 DORADO COURT
1 I 1 1LYNBROOK BOWL ADDITION 1PLANT CITY, FL 33566 1 1
$1,843.75
I�
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 7%25/88
Agenda Item Numbe
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
® ITEM DESCRIPTION:
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND PROVIDING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED
ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPPROVEMENT PROJECTS NO. 1988 -04 (LOGAN AVENUE STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT)
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
DEPT. APPROVAL:
* * * * * * * * * * * ** N **P * D *R* * °R *OF PUBLIC * OR * * ** ** k * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report . Comments below /attached
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes
The purpose of this resolution is to order a public hearing on Tuesday
September 6, 1988, at 8 P.M., local time, to hear and pass upon all objections,
if any, to the proposed special assessments for Improvement Project 1988 -04
• (Logan Avenue Street Improvement Project). It is a street construction project
and includes storm sewer improvements, regrading, subgrade preparation,
installation of concrete curb and gutter, bituminous paving, and construction
of sidewalks and bikeways in selected areas. The project location is along
Logan Avenue from 57th Avenue North to Lilac Drive and Lilac Drive from Logan
Avenue North to 59th Avenue North.
The following council actions regarding these projects were adopted:
Resolution Action
87 -225 Established project and called for reports
88 -29 Received the Engineer's Report and called for hearing on
the project
88 -44 Ordered the project and preparation of plans
88 -47 Approved plans and specifications and authorized
advertisement for bids
88 -66 Approved addendum 1 to contract 1988 -H
88 -103 Accepted bid and approved contract 1988 -H
Future council actions include the public hearing at the specified date and
adoption of the resolutions to certify the special assessment levy role with
the Hennepin County Auditor.
Recommendation
It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to
hold public hearing on these special assessments.
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND PROVIDING
FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1988 -04 (LOGAN AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT)
WHEREAS, a contract has been let for street improvements on Logan
Avenue North from 57th Avenue North to Lilac Drive and on Lilac Drive from
Logan Avenue North to 59th Avenue North, and
WHEREAS, the estimated costs of the street improvement project have
been tabulated and are presented below:
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NUMBER 1988 -04
Contract (as bid) $448,281.75
Engineering (City) 53,793.60
Administrative 4,482.80
Legal 4,482.80
Capitalized Interest 22.414.05
TOTAL $533,455.00
AND WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the Director of
Public Works, has prepared a proposed assessment roll showing the proposed
amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable
lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to
cash valuation, as provided by law:
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. That the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited
owners is declared to be
property 122 566.48 $
2. A hearing shall be held on the 6th day of September, 1988, in
the City Hall at 8 :00 P.M. to pass upon such assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with
reference to such assessment.
3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the hearing on
the proposed assessment to be published once in the official
newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall
state in the notice the total cost of the improvement.
4. The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner
of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two
weeks prior to the hearing.
I
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
------------------------------------------------
7/15/88
PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No.: 1988 -04 Logan Avenue North Street Improvements Levy No.: 11071
Description: Street construction including storm sewer installation, Fund /Code No.: 59 -021
regrading, subgrade preparation, concrete curb and gutter
installation, bituminous paving and sidewalk and Levy Description: Street (88 -04)88
bikeway construction
Levy runs 10 years with interest at the rate of
Location: Logan Avenue from 57th Avenue North to Lilac Drive and ten (10) percent.
Lilac Drive from Logan Avenue North to 59th Avenue North
First payment, with property taxes payable in
Improvement Hearing Date: March 14, 1988 1989 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest.
Improvement Ordered on: March 14, 1988 Date of Assessment Hearing: September 6, 1988
by Resolution No.: 88 -44 Adopted on:
Assessment District: Zone A: Property that abuts and benefits the from project by Resolution No.:
Zone B: Property that does not abut but benefits from the
project
Zone C: Single family residential property that abuts and Corrections, Deletions or Deferments:
benefits from the project
Zone D: Multi - family residential property that abuts and
benefits from the project.
Method of Apportionment: Zone A: $0.34627 /square foot
Zone B: $0.13851 /square foot
Zone C: $1,325 /parcel
Zone D: $649.80 /unit
Cost Summary
from Resolution No.: N/A
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: N/A
Less Direct City Share:
(Fund M.S.A.)
Less Other Payments:
TOTAL ASSESSED: $122,566.48
City Property:
Other Public Property:
Private Property: $122,566.48
r n
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER LOGAN AVENUE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PAGE 1 OF 2
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 20 YEAR LEVY PROJECT NO. 1988 -04 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification
1 Name
NO. 1 NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. I NO. I PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address
1 110711 102- 118 - 21-13 -0024 1 00203 1 $47,058.26 15712 MORGAN AVENUE NORTH (EVEST PARTNERS LTD.
1 1 1LOT 1, BLOCK 2 14901 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 206
INORTHBROOK CENTER ADDITION iDALLAS, TEXAS 75244
1 110711 102- 118-21 -13 -0025 1 00203 $9,699.64 1VACANT LAND (EVEST PARTNERS LTD. 1
LOT 2, BLOCK 2 4901 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 206
1 1 1 1 1 1 NORTHBROOK CENTER ADDITION 1DALLAS, TEXAS 75244 1
11071 102-118 -21- 13-0026 ! 00203 1 $17,558.60 15710 MORGAN AVENUE NORTH EVEST PARTNERS LTD. i
1 I 1 (LOT 3, BLOCK 2 14901 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 206 1
1 1 1 1 1 1NORTHBROOK CENTER ADDITION 1DALLAS, TEXAS 75244 i 1
1 110711 102- 118 -21 -13 -0029 1 00203 1 $6,943.41 11900 - 57TH AVENUE NORTH 1RONALD A LEE 1 1
LOT 6, BLOCK 2 3148 KENTUCKY AVENUE SOUTH
1 1 1 1 1 1NORTHBROOK CENTER ADDITION 1ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 1 1
1 11071 102-118- 21-14 -0002 89103 5706 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH ELSIE R HAWTHORNE
1 1 1 1 $1,325.00 1PART OF LOT 55 15706 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO 218 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
1 110711 102-118 -21- 14-0004 1 89103 1 $1,325.00 11808 - 57TH AVENUE NORTH 1LEONARD N ANDERSON 1 1
PART OF LOT 55 1808 - 57TH AVENUE NORTH
1 1 1 1 1 1AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO 218 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 i 1
1 110711 102- 118-21-14-0006 1 89103 1 $1,325.00 15712 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH 1STEVEN JOHN CONZET 1 1
1 1PART OF LOT 55 5712 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH
1 1 1 1 1 1AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO 218 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
1 110711 102-118- 21-14-0007 1 89103 1 $3,205.08 1 ?ART 55 1
LAND NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY 1 1
1 1AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO 218 1MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 1 1
1 11071 1 02- 118 - 21-14 -0019 1 89103 1 $11,195.60 5840 NORTH LILAC DRIVE NORTHBROOK CLINIC
1 1 1 1 1PART OF LOT 57 15840 NORTH LILAC DRIVE 1 1
1 1 1 ( 1 1AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO 218 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
1 110711 102-118- 21-14 -0025 1 89103 1 $17,732.49 158000 LOFGAN A5E NORTH 1 LOGAN CREEK
IPART NORTH PROPERTIES 1 1 ROAD
1 1 1 1 1 1AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO 218 1FRIDLEY, MN 55432 1
11071 102-118-21-14-0100 1 01136 1 $649.80 5744 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH JAMES L LUNDQUIST
1 1 1 1LOT 1, BLOCK 1 12900 - 80TH AVENUE NORTH 1
1 1 1 1 1 1NORTHBROOK ESTATES 1BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55444 1 1
! i �
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER LOGAN AVENUE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PAGE 2 OF 2
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 20 YEAR LEVY PROJECT NO. 1988 -04 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification 1
1 LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY 1 ADDN. 1 TOTAL 1 Address 1 Name 1 Name
1 NO. 1 NO. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. 1 PRINCIPAL 1 Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address Mailing Address 1
1 11071 1 102- 118-21-14 -0101 01136 $649.80 5740 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH ` DAWN M LUNDQUIST
_ ILOT 2, BLOCK 1 122000 TULIP STREET NW 1
1 I I I 1NORTHBRO0K ESTATES IOAK GROVE, MN 55303 I 1
1 110711 102-118- 21-14 -0102 1 01136 1 $649.80 1 5736 3 L0GAN AVENUE NORTH 1 5736 STEVEN J LO ECHLER NORTH 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1NORTHBROOK ESTATES 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
1 110711 102- 118 - 21-14 -0103 1 01136 1 $649.80 15732 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH 1MICHELE R PETERSON 1 1
LOT 4, BLOCK 1 15732 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH
1 1 1 1 1NORTHBROOK ESTATES 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
1 110711 102- 118 -21 -14 -0104 1 01136 1 $649.80 157285LOGAN AVENUE NORTH JUDITH A NORTH 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1NORTHBROOK ESTATES 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 i 1
1 110711 102 -118- 21 -14 -0105 1 01136 1 $649.80 15724 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH 1WILLIAM P KELLY 1 1
LOT 6, BLOCK 1 15724 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH
1 1 1 1 1 1NORTHBROOK ESTATES 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
1 110711 102 118 - 21 - 0106 i 01136 1 $649.80 15720 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH 1PATRICIA C BENNIS 1 1
LOT 7, BLOCK 1 5720 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH
1 1 1 1 1 1NORTHBROOK ESTATES 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
1 110711 102-118- 21-14 -0107 1 01136 1 $649.80 15716 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH 1PAUL A & SUSAN F CICHY 1 1
LOT 8, BLOCK 1 5716 LOGAN AVENUE NORTH
1 NORTHBROOK ESTATES 1BR00KLYN CENTER, MN 55430 1 1
I I I I I I I i i
$122,566.48
- - i
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 7/25/88
Agenda Item Numbe
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
• ITEM RE O LU ION I DECLLARRING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND PROVIDING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED
ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 1988 -05 (FRANCE AVENUE STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT), 1988 -06 (LAKEBREEZE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT),
AND 1988 -07 (50TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT)
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
DEPT. APPROVAL:
* * * * * * * * ** KNA *4* DIRE** OR OF PUBLIC WQRK ** ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes
The purpose of this resolution is to order a public hearing on Tuesday
September 6
p r 1988, at 8 P.M., local time, to hear and pass upon all objections,
if any, to the proposed special assessments for Improvement Projects 1988 -05
• (France Avenue Street Improvement Project), 1988 -06 (Lakebreeze Avenue Street
Improvement Project), 1988 -07 (50th Avenue Street Improvement Project). These
projects include storm sewer improvements, regrading, subgrade preparation,
installation of concrete curb and gutter, bituminous paving, and construction
of sidewalks and bikeways in selected areas. The project location includes
France Avenue North from the South City Limits to 50th Avenue North, Lakebreeze
Avenue North from France Avenue North to Azelia.Avenue North and 50th Avenue
North from France Avenue North to Trunk Highway 100.
The following council actions regarding these projects were adopted:
Resolution Action
87 -225 Established project and called for reports
88 -29 Received the Engineer's Report and called for hearing on
the project
88 -45 Ordered the project and preparation of plans
88 -47 Approved plans and specifications and authorized
advertisement for bids
88 -66 Approved addendum 1 to contract 1988 -H
88 -103 Accepted bid and approved contract 1988 -H
Future council actions include the public hearing at the specified date and
adoption of the resolutions to certify the special assessment levy role with
the Hennepin County Auditor.
• Recommendation
It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to
hold public hearing on these special assessments.
l
�h
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND PROVIDING
FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NOS. 1988 -05 (FRANCE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT), 1988 -06 (LAKEBREEZE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT), AND 1988 -07 (50TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT)
WHEREAS, a contract has been let for street improvements on France
Avenue North from the southern limits to 50th Avenue North; on Lakebreeze
Avenue North from France Avenue North to Azelia Avenue North; and on 50th
Avenue North from France Avenue North to Trunk Highway 100, and
WHEREAS, these projects were assigned separate project numbers for the
purpose of Municipal State Aid accounting and are combined for the purpose of
calculating special assessment rates, and
WHEREAS, the combined project costs are estimated to be as follows:
Contract $487,981.15
Engineering (City) 58,557.74
Administrative 4,879.81
Legal 4,879.81
Capitalized Interest 16.470.49
TOTAL $572,769.00
WHEREAS, the City Clerk, with the assistance of the Director of
Public Works, has prepared a proposed assessment roll showing the proposed
amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable
lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to
cash valuation, as provided by law:
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. That the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited
property owners is declared to be $367,617.90
2. A hearing shall be held on the 6th day of September, 1988, in
the City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with
reference to such assessment.
3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the hearing on
the proposed assessment to be published once in the official
newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall
state in the notice the total cost of the improvement.
4. The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner
of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two
weeks prior to the hearing.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
0 r
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
------------------------------------------------
7/15/88
PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No.: 1988 -05, 06, 07 France Avenue Area Street Improvements Levy No.: 11072
Description: Street construction including storm sewer installation, Fund /Code No.: 59-022
regrading, subgrade preparation, concrete curb and gutter
installation, bituminous paving and sidewalk and Levy Description: Street (88 -05 to 88 -07)88
bikeway construction
Levy runs 20 years with interest at the rate of
Location: France Avenue North from the South City Limits to 50th ten (10) percent.
Avenue North, Lakebreeze Avenue North from France Avenue
North to Azelia Avenue North and 50th Avenue North from First payment, with property taxes payable in
France Avenue North to trunk Highway 100 1989 shall include fifteen (15) whole months interest.
Improvement Hearing Date: March 14, 1988 Date of Assessment Hearing: September 6, 1988
Improvement Ordered on: March 14, 1988
by Resolution No.: 88 -45 Adopted on:
Assessment District: Zone A: Property that abuts and benefits the from project by Resolution No.:
Zone B: Property that does not abut but benefits from the
project
Zone C: Single family residential property that abuts and Corrections, Deletions or Deferments:
benefits from the project
Zone D: Multifamily residential property that abuts and
benefits from the project.
Method of Apportionment: Zone A: 50.25110 /square foot
Zone B: 50.08878 /square foot
Zone C: 51,325 /parcel
Cost Summary
from Resolution No.: N/A
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST: N/A
Less Direct City Share:
Less Other Payments:
TOTAL ASSESSED: $367,617.90
City Property:
Other Public Property:
Private Property: $367,617.90
i ! !
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FRANCE AVENUE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PAGE 1 OF 3
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 10 YEARS PROJECT 1988 -05, 06, & 07 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification
LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY I ADDN. I TOTAL 1 Address Name 1 Name 1
NO. I NO. 11DENTIFICATION NO.1 NO. 1 PRINCIPAL 1 Addition /Legal Description 1 Mailing Address 1 Mailing Address 1
1 11072 110-118 -21- 13-0003 89010 $4,225.57 15001 DREW AVENUE NORTH ISIGURD FOLLESE JR/ SCHWARTZ OIL CO
1 1 I = 1UNPLATTED SECTION 10 15182 WEST BROADWAY
1
{ i i (CRYSTAL, MN 55429
111072 I 110- 118-21 - 13-0006 I 89010 1 $4,163.80 1 1 5000 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH JAMES TALMAGE
1 I 1UNPLATTED SECTION 10 13715 - 50TH AVENUE NORTH
I BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429
1 1 11072 1 110-118-21-13-0042 1 90081 1 $4,163.80 15001 EWING AVENUE NORTH IBARTHOLOMEW DABROWSKI 1 1
1 I ( 1 ILOT 16, BLOCK 2 15001 EWING AVENUE NORTH 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1TWIN LAKE WOODS 2ND ADDITION 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 1
1 11072 10-118-21 -13 -0051 1 90081 3616 - 50TH AVENUE NORTH WILLIAM R & LINDA D BJERKE
1 1 1 1 $4,225.57 1LOT 7, BLOCK 3 15309 EAST TWIN LAKE BOULEVARD 1 1
1 1 1 I 1 1TWIN LAKE WOODS 2ND ADDITION 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 1
1 11072 110- 118 - 21- 13-0059 89275 $4,549.01 13607 - 50TH AVENUE NORTH HELIX MACHINE COMPANY
1 I 1 1 ILOT 1, BLOCK 5 13607 - 50TH AVENUE NORTH 1 1
I 1 I BROOKLYN MANOR 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 1
111072 1 110-118- 21-13 -0060 1 89275 1 $3,130.05 13615 - 50TH AVENUE NORTH 1BENNING, INC 1 1
ILOT 2, BLOCK 5 3615 - 50TH AVENUE NORTH
1 1 1 1 1 1BROOKLYN MANOR 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 1
111072 1 110- 118-21-13-0061 1 89275 1 $3,130.05 13701 - 50TH AVENUE NORTH 1HAPPYVILLE MINNESOTA, INC 1 1
LOT 3, BLOCK 5 13701 - 50TH AVENUE NORTH
1 1 1 1 I 1BROOKLYN MANOR 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 1
111072 1 110- 118 -21 -13 -0062 1 89275 1 $3,130.05 13707 - 50TH AVENUE NORTH 1WILLIAM HARKESS 1 1
LOT 4, BLOCK 5 ROUTE 1, BOX 222
1 1 1 1 1 1BROOKLYN MANOR 1DELANO, MN 55328 1 1
1 11072 1 110- 118-21 -13 -0063 1 89275 1 $3,471.43 13 715 5 & OF LOT NORTH OBLOCK 5 I7541 &EWOOD TALMAGE 1 1 DRIVE
1 1 1 1 1 1BROOKLYN MANOR 1MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418 1 1
111072 1 110- 118-21-13-0064 1 89275 1 $2,788.67 13721 - 50TH AVENUE NORTH IJAMES TALMAGE 1 1
PART OF LOT 6, BLOCK 5 DRIVE
1 1 1 1 1 1BROOKLYN MANOR 1MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418 1 1
11072 110-118- 21-13-0065 1 89275 1 $5,001.59 14912 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH 1C E ANDERSON, SR 1 1
I I ILOT 7, BLOCK 5 16401 WELCOME AVENUE NORTH 1
1 1 1 1 1 1BROOKLYN MANOR 1BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55429 1 1
! 0 !
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FRANCE AVENUE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PAGE 2 OF 3
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 10 YEARS PROJECT 1988 -05, 06, & 07 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification
1 LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL 1 Address 1 Name ' Name
NO. I NO. 11DENTIFICATION NO. I NO. i PRINCIPAL i Addition /Legal Description i Mailing Address i Mailing Address
89275
11072 110-118 -21 -13 -0066
` 1 4906 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH DAVID B HEEGAARD /BRUCE SANDBERG
1 $4,604.19 1LOT 8, BLOCK 5 14906 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH
BROOKLYN MANOR BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429
1 11072 1 1 89275 1 4900 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH WILLIAM N DUDLEY 1
' 1 10-118 -21- 13-0067 = 1 $1,367.83 (PART OF LOT 9, BLOCK 5 4900 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH 1 1
1 i I 1 BROOKLYN MANOR IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1
11072 I 10-118 -21- 13-0068 I I 89275 1 $4,214.72 14902 ART FRANCE
9, BLOCK 5 14900 FRANCE
WILLIAM U AVENUE NORTH ' I
1 I 1 ISROOKLYN MANOR 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 I 1
111072 I 110- 118 -21- 23-0004 1 89010 1$119,807.82 14837 FRANCE AVENUE 10 RTH 1 NORTH
JOSLYN CO I 1
UNPLATTED 1 I I 1 1 1CHICAGO, IL 60606 1 1
1 11072 1 110- 118 - 21-24-0002 1 89010 1 $18,531.75 1UNPLATTED NE10 RTH 13140 SOUTH 14440CWESTE25THISTREETENT 1
1 1 I I 1 I IMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 1
111072 1 110 - 118 -21 -24 -0003 1 89010 1 $31,677.41 14911 FRANCE AVENUE 10 RTH 1NORTHERN STATES
MALL
COMPANY 1 1
UNPLATTED 1 1 1 1 1 I MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 I 1
1 11072 10- 118-21-31-0004 89010 $1,325.00 14639 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH CHERYL A RIEBE 1 1
1 1 1 1 JUNPLATTED SECTION 10 13222 JAMES AVENUE NORTH
1 1 1 1 1 1MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55412 I 1
117072 1 110- 118 - 21-31-0005 1 89010 I $1,325.00 1UNPLATTEDCSECTIONE10 RTH 14629 N FRANCE S
NORTH 1 1
I1 1 1 IBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55422
1 11072 10 -118- 21-31 -0008 89338 $23,091.37 4010 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE ALVIN E DAVIES FREDERICK E JONES / ALVIN E DAVIES 1
1 1 1 i 1LOT 3, BLOCK 1 15625 EVERGREEN LANE 14010 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE 1
1 1 1DALE AND DAVIES 1ST ADDITION (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55442 (BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429
111072 1 X10- 118 -21 -31 -0015 1 89743 1 $3,967.59 14715 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH 1PAUL E HINCK 1
TRACT B 3207 - 73RD LANE
i 1REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO 1082 1BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55443 1 1
111072 1 110-118-21- 31-0016 1 89743 1 $1,325.00 1TRACTFRANCE AVENUE NORTH 1 FRANCE
DAVIDS AVENUE NORTH 1 1
1 1 1 ( 1 1REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO 1082 ,BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55422 1 1
A
! 0 0
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FRANCE AVENUE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PAGE 3 OF 3
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL 10 YEARS PROJECT 1988-05, 06, & 07 7/15/88
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification
LEVY 1PROJECTI PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL I Address 1 Name i Name 1
NO. 1 NO. (IDENTIFICATION N0,1 N0, PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description I Mailing Address 1 Mailing Address
111072 1 110-118-21-31-0024 1 89336 I $12,847.32 13901 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE IDENNYIS, INC % MICHAEL D CLARK
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 16700 VALLEY VIEW AVE - PO BOX 605
1 1 1 1 I (DALE AND DAVIES 2ND ADDITION ILA MIRADA, CA 90637 I 1
' 11072 10-118 -21 -31 -0027 01829 1 $18,857.01 1 4825 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH ( WILLIAM J DALE
1 1 1 iLOT 1, BLOCK 1 1340 EAST DIAMOND LAKE ROAD i 1
1 1 1 1 I 1 DALE AND DAVIES 3RD ADDITION MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55419
1
I 1
1 11072 1 110-118-21-31-0028 1 01829 1 $17,502.95 136502LAKEBREEZE AVENUE 15525ASOUTH TENNIS L CLUB, INC 1 1
1 1 1 1 1DALE AND DAVIES 3RD ADDITION ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 1 1
111072 1 110 - 118-21- 31-0029 1 02333 1 $37,967.34 14001 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE 15525 T INC 1 1
LOT 1 BLOCK 1
1 1 1 I 1 1TENNIS ACRES TWO 1ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 1 1
111072 1 110-118-21- 42-0002 1 89712 1 $10,875.69 14800 AR LILAC DRIVE 14780 C H 5 8 RH A
TRACT C SNNORTH 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO 546 1CRYSTAL, MN 55427 1 1
1 11072 110- 118 - 21-42 -0007 1 89735 $9,980.88 4748 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH WISE GREENWALD & GREENWALD
1 I 1 1 1TRACT A 14748 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO 952 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 1 1
111072 1 110- 118 -21 -42 -0024 1 89963 1 $6,369.44 13725 - 47TH AVENUE NORTH 1LUCILLE H HANGGI 1 1
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 3725 - 47TH AVENUE NORTH
1 1 1 I I 1RYAN LAKE TERRACE 1BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55422 1 1
$367,617.90
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 7/25/88
Agenda Item Numbe
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF TITLE AND POSSESSION AND SETTING THE
APPROVED APPRAISAL OF VALUE PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 117.042 FOR
THE PEDESTRIAN /BICYCLE TRAILWAY ON 57TH AVENUE NORTH
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
DEPT. APPROVAL: r-"\ �-
r
M
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report. Comments below /attached
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached
Explanation
The attached resolution is a confirmation of the previous action by City Council
• to authorize eminent domain proceedings. The attached resolution enables the
City to use the quick take process that assures possession in 90 days.
The easements to be acquired are along 57th Avenue North between Lilac Drive and
the SuperAmerica service station at Logan Avenue. The easements have an
appraised value of $1,100.00.
Previous Action by the Council
7/11/88 - Approved Resolution 88 -120, authorizing initiation of eminent domain
proceedings.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution which
authorizes use of the quick take process.
•
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF TITLE AND POSSESSION
AND SETTING THE APPROVED APPRAISAL OF VALUE PURSUANT TO
MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 117.042 FOR THE PEDESTRIAN/
BICYCLE TRAILWAY ON 57TH AVENUE NORTH
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 88 -120, the Brooklyn Center City Council
authorized condemnation of an easement for the construction and maintenance of a
pedestrian /bicycle trailway along the south side of 57th Avenue North (C.S.A.H.
57) between Logan Avenue North and Lilac Drive on tracts C and D, Registered
Land Survey Number 1114, Hennepin County, Minnesota, the legal description of
which easements are as follows:
Easement No. 1
A sidewalk and trailway easement over, under, and upon that part of Tract D,
Registered Land Survey Number 1114, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly
of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the westerly line of said Tract D, which point
being 3.00 feet south of the northwesterly corner of said Tract D;
thence easterly along a line that is parallel and 3.00 feet distant
from the northerly line of said Tract D to the easterly line of said
Tract D and there terminating.
and
Easement No. 2
A sidewalk and trailway easement over, under, and upon that part of Tract C,
Registered Land Survey Number 1114, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly
of the following described line:
Beginning at the northwesterly corner of said Tract C thence easterly
to a point on the westerly line of Tract D of said Registered Land
Survey Number 1114, which point being 3.00 feet south of the
northwesterly corner of said Tract D and there terminating.
(hereinafter referred to as the "easements ")
WHEREAS, it is necessary, proper, and expedient, and in the interest of
the public health, convenience, and welfare of the citizens of the City that
title to and possession of the easements be acquired prior to the filing of the
final report of the condemnation commissioners to be appointed; and
RESOLUTION N0.
WHEREAS, the City has ordered and received written appraisal reports
setting forth the damages, if any, that will result on account of the
acquisition of the easements.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CI OUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that it is necessary, convenient, and in the public
interest that the easements be acquired by eminent domain for sidewalk and
trailway purposes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Attorney is hereby authorized and
directed to undertake such proceedings on behalf of the City as are necessary to
acquire the easements by eminent domain under the laws of the State of
Minnesota, including the use of Minn. Stat. 117.042 (1986), and that the
approved appraisal of value of said easements within the meaning of Minn. Stat.
117.042 (1986) is determined to be $950.00 for the above - described Easement No.
1 and $150.00 for the above- described Easement No. 2, or $1,100.00 for the
combined easements.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon n said resolution was declared dul y passed and adopted.
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 25th day of
July 1988 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek
Parkway, tc- consider an amendment to Chapter 6 Regarding Administrative Code.
Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96
hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 561 -5440 to make
arrangements.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 6 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center
is hereby amended in the following manner:
Section 6 -102. ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION.' The administrative services
of the City shall be divided into the following departments and offices and
heads thereof, and said departments, offices and positions are hereby created:
City Manager's Office ...................City Manager
Deputy City Manager
City Clerk's Office.. City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
[City Treasurer's Office .................City Treasurer]
[Deputy City Treasurer]
City Assessor's Office ..................City Assessor
Department of Finance Deputy City Assessor
/City Treasurer's Office ................Director of Finance /City Treasurer
Deputy City Treasurer
Department of Public Works ..............Director of Public Works
Department of Police ....................Chief of Police
Department of Planning and Inspection... Director of Planning and Inspection
Department of Parks and Recreation ...... Director of Pa
rks
[ and] Recreation
Fire Department .........................Fire Chief
Municipal Liquor Facility ...............Liquor Stores Manager
[Assistant Liquor Store Manager]
Section 6 -103 AUTHORITY, DUTIES, AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY
MANAGER. The city manager shall be the head of the administrative branch of the
City government and shall be responsible to the city council for the proper
administration of all affairs relating to the City. The city manager shall have
the authorities, duties, and responsibilities conferred upon [him] the city
manager by law, the City Charter and City Ordinance not inconsistent with the
City Charter.
ORDINANCE NO.
Section 6 -105. FUNCTIONS, DUTIES, AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE OFFICE
THE CITY CLERK. The office of the city clerk shall be administered by the city
clerk who shall be responsible to and appointed by the city manager. The city
clerk or [his deputy] the city clerk's designee shall act as secretary of the
city council. The city clerk shall have duties and responsibilities in
connection with the keeping and maintaining of the City records and such other
duties and responsibilities as may be assigned by the city manager and the
provisions of the City Charter.
[Section 6 -107. FUNCTIONS, DUTIES, AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE OFFICE OF
THE CITY TREASURER. The office of city treasurer shall be administered by the
city treasurer who shall be responsible to and appointed by the city manager.
The city treasurer shall have duties and responsibilities in connection with the
disbursement and custody of public funds and such other duties as may be
assigned g b the city y manager and the provisions of the City Charter.]
[Section 6 -108. DUTIES AND APPOINTMENT OF DEPUTY CITY TREASURER.]
[6- 108.10. Duties. The deputy city treasurer shall, in the absence of the
treasurer, perform all duties normally performed by the city treasurer.]
[6- 108.20. Appointment The deputy city treasurer shall be appointed by
the city manager.]
Section 6 -111. FUNCTIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE / OFFICE OF THE CITY
TREASURE .
THE
Section 6 -112. DUTIES, APPOINTMENT, AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DIRECTOR
OF FINANCE /CITY TREASURER AND DEPUTY CITY TREASURER
6- 112.10. Responsible to City Manager The director of finance /cit
treasurer shall be appointed by the city manager and shall be responsible to,
and under the supervision of., the city manager for the management and
administration of the department of finance and city treasurer's office
6- 112.20. [ Financial Advisor Duties. The director /treasurer shall be
financial advisor[y] to the city manager, and shall assist the e
city manager "
Y g in
the
preparation and presentation of the annual budget. The director /treasurer
shall have duties and res onsibilities in connection with the disbursement and
custod of Public funds.
6- 112.30. Financial Procedures The director /treasurer shall be
responsible for the application of approved financial and accounting procedures
and methods employed within the department, and shall recommend to the city
manager accounting procedures to be adopted by all administrative departments.
6- 112.40. Reports. The director /treasurer shall prepare, or supervise the
preparation of-, all reports requested of [him] the director /treasurer by the
city manager[,] or that are required by law.
ORDINANCE NO.
6- 112.50. Additional Duties The director /treasurer shall perform an
additional duties that may be assigned from time to time by the city manager and
by the provisions of the city charter
6- 112.60. Duties and Appointment of Deputy City Treasurer. The deputy
city treasurer shall in the absence of the treasurer, perform all duties
normally performed by the city treasurer. The deputv city treasurer shall be
appointed by the manager.
WORKS Section 6 -113 ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
6- 113.10. Organization The department of public works shall be composed
of a director of public works and the following divisions and division heads:
Engineering Division .......................City Engineer
Street Division .... .......................[Street Superintendent]
••••••••••• ••••••• .......... Superintendent of Public Works
Public Utilities Division .................[Public Utilities Sup't.]
Superintendent of Public Works
Parks Maintenance Division .................Su erintendent of Public Works
Government Buildings Division ............ ..raintenance Su ervisor
6- 113.20. Function. The primary function of the department of public
works shall be the planning, coordination, and supervision of all public works
projects[,] and maintenance and operation of existing public works facilities[,]
within the City.
6 -11_ 360. _ Parks Maintenance Division. The parks maintenance division
shall be responsible for the maintenance of the CitVparks system
6- 113.70. Government Buildinzs Division The government buildines
division shall be responsible for the maintenance and operation of existing Cit
buildings and grounds in the City_
[6- 113.60.] 6- 113.80. Reports and Records The department of public works
shall prepare- such reports as may be requested by the _city manager and shall
maintain the special assessment record in accordance with procedures recommended
by -the director of finance.
Section 6 -114. DUTIES, APPOINTMENT, AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DIRECTOR
OF PUBLIC WORKS AND DIVISION HEADS.
6- 114.10. Responsible to City Manager_ The director of public works
shall be appointed by the city manager and shall be responsible to, and under
the supervision of, the city manager for the management and operation of the
department of public works.
6- 114.20. Engineering Advisor The director shall be the engineering
advisor to the city manager[,] and shall advise the city manager on all matters
pertaining to public works. [He] The director shall advise and assist the city
. manager in preparation of the public works portion of the annual budget.
ORDINANCE NO.
6- 114.30. Representative. The director shall attend meetings and
represent the City at official or semi - official functions, as may be a igned or
directed by the city manager.
6- 114.50. Division Heads The _city engineer, the [street] superintendent
of public works _and_._the._[public ;utilities superintendent,] maintenance
supervisor shall be under the supervision of[,] and responsible to[,] the
director of public works[,] and shall perform such tasks as the director may
from time to time assign.
Section 6 -116 DUTIES, APPOINTMENT, AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CHIEF OF
POLICE.
6- 116.20. - Personnel. The chief of police shall be responsible for the
training of police personnel. [He] The chief shall directly supervise and be
responsible for the operations of the department.
Section 6 -118 DUTIES, APPOINTMENT, AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DIRECTOR
OF PLANNING AND INSPECTION. -
6- 118.10. Duties. The director of planning and inspection shall be
appointed by the city manager and shall be responsible to, and under the
supervision of the city manager for the administration, supervision, and
operation P ,
P n of the department of planning and inspection.
Section 6 -119 FUNCTIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION. The
department of parks and recreation shall supervise the acquisition and
development[, and provide for the maintenance] of all public park property
within the City, and shall.develop and-implement a public recreation program. _
Section 6 -120 DUTIES, APPOINTMENT, AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DIRECTOR
OF [PARKS AND] RECREATION.
6- 120.10. - Responsible to City Manager The director of [parks and]
recreation shall be appointed by the city manager and shall be responsible to,
and under the supervision of, the city manager for the management and operation
of the department of parks and recreation and the golf course
6- 120.20. Parks and Recreation Advisor The director shall be the parks
and recreation advisor to the city manager[,] and shall advise the city manager
on all matters pertaining to park development [and management] and the program
of public recreation conducted by the department. [He] The director shall also,
as assigned, advise relevant City advisory commissions on matters relating to
the parks and recreation function.
6- 120.30. Budget. The director shall assist the city manager in the
preparation of that portion of the annual budget pertaining to (parks and]
recreation.
Section 6 -122. FUNCTION AND OPERATION OF THE MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FACILITY.
The function and operation of the municipal liquor facility shall be as set out
in Chapter 11, Section 201 through [207] 205 of the City Ordinances.
ORDINANCE NO. _
Section 6 -123. DUTIES, APPOINTMENT, AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF LIQUOR STORES
MANAGER.
6- 123,10. Responsible to City Mana er The liquor stores manager shall be
appointed by the city manager and shall be responsible to, and under the
supervision of, the city manager for the management and operation of the
municipal liquor operation. [He] The liquor stores manager shall be responsible
for the supervision and training of liquor store personnel.
6- 123.20. Advisor. The liquor stores manager shall advise the city
manager in regard to the operation of the municipal liquor operation and
recommend policy in regard to such operation.
6- 123.30. Additional Duties The liquor stores manager shall perform any
additional duties that may be assigned from time to time by the city manager.
I
Section 6 -124 ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY.
6- 124.10. General Duties of Officers. Each officer listed in Section 6-
102 of this code shall perform all duties required of his or her office ffice
b State
ate
law, City rdinances City t Charter, and the city manager.
er. g
Section 2, This ordinance shall become effective adoption and upon thirty
(30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 1987.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Underline indicates new matter, brackets matter to be deleted.)
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER qb
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 25th day of
. July , 1988 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway,
to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding the parking requirements
for places of public assembly.
Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours
in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 561 -5440 to make
arrangements.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 REGARDING THE PARKING
REQUIREMENT FOR PLACES OF PUBLIC ASSEMBLY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn
Center is hereby amended in the following manner:
Section 35 -704. MINIMUM PARKING SPACES REQUIRED.
4. Miscellaneous
a. Places of public assembly such as churches, theatres, auditoriums
(other than school auditoriums) mortuaries, stadiums, arenas,
dance halls:
One space for every three seats. Places of public assembly
loc ated in a retail shopp center complex shall have one space
for eve four seats.
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon
thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 1988.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter).
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 7/2
Agenda Item Number /
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF XERXES AVENUE NORTH BETWEEN 68TH AVENUE NORTH
AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF BLOCK 1, ELSEN'S CITY VIEW AND 3RD ADDITION
DEPT. APPROVAL: (�
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes
Explanation
A street vacation request (see copy attached) has been submitted by the owner of
the property which abuts the dead -end portion of Xerxes Avenue No. which lies
north of 68th Avenue North. As noted in the petitioner's letter, this section
of street was originally platted with the intent that it be extended northerly
to 69th Avenue. However, all properties to the north and east of the dead end
street have been platted and developed without providing for such extension.
Accordingly, the only property served by the street is the property owned by the
petitioner.
A review of existing conditions indicates that utility lines (including a water
main, a storm sewer, and NSP's transmission line) are located on or across this
area, and that it does provide a drainageway for storm water from 68th Avenue.
Staff Recommendation
There appears to be no need to retain the street easement across this property.
Vacation of the street easement will eliminate the City's responsibility to
provide maintenance of what operates as a private driveway. It will also allow
petitioner to exercise access control over that property. That is the basic
reason for his request.
However, the City should retain an easement covering all utilities and drainage
rights over the entire portion of the street to be vacated.
Recommendation
. Conduct first reading of the proposed ordinance (copy attached).
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of
at p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek
Parkway, to consider An Ordinance Vacating the right of way of Xerxes Avenue
North, north of the northerly right -of -way of 68th Avenue North in Elsen's City
View 3rd Addition.
Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96
hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 561 -5440 to make
arrangements.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE VACATING THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF XERXES AVENUE
NORTH, NORTH OF THE NORTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY OF 68TH AVENUE
NORTH IN ELSEN'S CITY VIEW 3RD ADDITION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That portion of Xerxes Avenue North described below is
hereby vacated as a public street:
That portion of Xerxes Avenue which lies between the easterly
extension of the northerly right -of -way line of 68th Avenue North and
the northerly line of Block 1 Elsen's City View 3rd Addition
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Section 2. The City excepts from the vacation of Xerxes Avenue North
as described above, and reserves to itself and its assigns an easement for all
utility and drainage purposes upon over, and under the entire property above
described as vacated. No structure shall hereafter be erected upon the easement
reservation
Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and
thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of ,
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Date of Publication
i Effective Date
_fume 15. . 988
Mr. Roy E. Tewalt
3000 - 68th Ave. No.
Brooklyn Center, [IN 5542
(612) 561 -3723
Mr. Gerald Splinter
City Manager
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shinqle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Dear Mr. Splinter:
I am writing to ask the City of Brooklyn Center to vacate their
right of way on Xerxes Ave No., north of 68th Ave No..
I understand the initial use for this was to be able to connect
Xerxes Ave No. to 64th Ave No., which plan I also understand has
been abandoned.
This stretch of Xerxes Ave No. is becoming a nuisance as well as
a safety hazard to my children and friends who play in my
driveway. On many instances, people unfamiliar with the neighbor,
turn on Xerxes and use my driveway as a turn around. As normal,
some motorists are careful, while some are quite careless. (I'll
spare you some of the stories.)
From the city's advantage, snow removal and street sweeping would
be made a little easier.
I've enclosed a map of the exact area I am speaking about.
Please call or write if you have any questions.
Si c rely,
L•
0 E. Tewalt
r�
Po ►1 0
7�
Z A9 ND
a0
a�
0
�O
\ M
G
PkLYER LAKE
( kER1AL MVO) _
L i �- 1 956 <RIAI "77)
V
Y
69 5, C 9 ' r
i
< i
> i
® X ES
i
�8rN. ,v . N
P
n k� NINGLE GREEK PKWY
u11J [
°D. h
y.�. pGtn. Iv0.�4
Qom,
mil/ 9 <
66TH. AVE. N.
0
6 67H
Z z �Ah
a < ®' O f
` Z o 9WRC ES RD
3 4
i �S
L�
VICINITY OF XERXES AVE RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION
I
Q 500 i 000
ROOL M I i
SCALE iN FEET
PREPARED BY ULTIMAP
SHEET i OF z
1
1
l
Z \
t
1 1
�y \
1
3 cr ca 5
a N
6 s8 ° Z z RM S5
o �O
5 15
6 `
ESLESEN'S CITY VIEW 5
2ND ADD'N.
5
�s
. • � i
® 4
N
Q 1
P
MA
Q
I
68 Ty
S AN sEwER q V E ' No.
\
I
XERXES AVE RIGHT -OF -WAY
M MM 0 30 (00
E ROCKL� �UV SCALE IN BEET
D
PREPARED BY ULTIMAP
SHEET 2 OF Z
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council Meeting Date 7 Z5.Z3B
Agenda Item Numbe
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
• ITEM DESCRIPTION:
AN ORDINANCE VACATING PART OF UTILITY EASEMENT IN LOT 1, BLOCK 3, DONNAY'S
BROOKLYN GARDENS 2ND ADDITION
DEPT. APPROVAL:
* * * * * * * * * * * **N * * * * # * DIRE TOR *O PU B * * * * **OR * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report Comments below/attached-
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached Yes
Explanation
S In July, 1959, Mr. Eugene Hammerlund received a quit claim deed from the City of
Brooklyn Center for the south ten feet of a fifteen foot easement on the north
line of his property. The deed permitted the construction of a garage near the
north property line. The deed was not correctly executed.
Mr. Hammerlund did not record the document and so he did not realize that the
document had not been fully executed. It is too late to fully execute that
document since the documentation related to the execution of the quit claim deed
cannot be found. The easiest solution is to reinitiate the process by vacating
the easement.
Pursuant to City code, we will notify all of the utility companies of the City's
plan to vacate part of this easement. A public hearing is required.
Future Action by City Council
City Council will hold a public hearing to receive public input relative to
the vacation.
Recommendation
It is recommended that City Council approve the attached ordinance on first
reading and set the date for a public hearing on the vacation.
•
qV
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
•
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of
, at p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek
Parkway, to consider An Ordinance Vacating Part of a Utility Easement in Lot 1,
Block 3, Donnay's Brooklyn Gardens 2nd Addition.
Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96
hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 561 -5440 to make
arrangements.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE VACATING PART OF A UTILITY EASEMENT IN LOT 1,
BLOCK 3, DONNAY'S BROOKLYN GARDENS 2ND ADDITION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The southerly 10.00 feet of the 15.00 foot drainage and
utility easement along the northerly lot line of Lot 1 Block 3 Donnay's 2nd
Addition, Hennepin County Minnesota except the westerly 5.00 feet of said
easement, is hereby vacated
Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and
thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of ,
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
i
I
i
Ll
i
HUNE LA.
66TH. AvE. N.
Z
UJ
r
r -
WINCHESTER LA.
LOT 1
BLOCK 3
I I I 1 -1 1 : � I -
N .
Q
z P�� DR. <
o �
z
64 A N. uu;
d
VICINITY MAP
DONNAYS BROOKLYN GARDENS
EASEMENT VACATION
SCALE IN FEET (I�
I
PREPARED BY ULTIMAP
SHEET 1 OF 2
i
i
1
LOT 3
1
cn _ 127
5 1����������-
I
l
i
1
1
i
H LOS
I
Q
CD I
co
I
CD 51
Z 127
i
D
LOT 2
EASEMENT VACATION
DONNAY'S BROOKLYN GARDEN 2ND ADDITION
LOT 1 BLOCK 3
�Mt�/ M 0 30 60
C, ROCKL U SCALE IN FEES
PREPARED BY ULTIMAP
SHEET 2 OF 2
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
JULY 14, 1988
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Planning Commission met in regular session and was called to order by Chairman
George Lucht at 7:31 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chairman George Lucht, Commissioners Wallace Bernards, Mike Nelson and Bertil
Johnson. Also present were Director of Planning and Inspection Ronald Warren, City
Engineer Bo Spurrier and Planner Gary Shallcross. Chairman Lucht explained that
Commissioners Malecki and Ainas were unable to attend and were excused.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - June 16, 1988
Motion by Commissioner Nelson seconded by Commissioner Bernards to approve the
minutes of the June 16, 1988 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. Voting in
favor: Commissioners Bernards, Nelson and Johnson. Voting against: none. Not
voting: Chairman Lucht. The motion passed.
APPLICATION NO. 88008 (John Werner)
Following the Chairman's explanation, the Secretary introduced the first item of
business, a request for variance approval to allow a transfer of land by metes and
bounds subdivision at 6811 and 6827 Colfax Avenue North. The Secretary reviewed
. the contents of the staff report (see Planning Commission Information Sheet for
Application No. 88008 attached).
Commissioner Nelson asked what the purpose of the land transfer was. The Secretary
answered that he thought it was to square out the lots. Commissioner Nelson asked
whether it was to get around any setback requirement. The Secretary responded in
the negative. Commissioner Johnson asked whether the lots would be more square
when the rear lot lines would no longer be the same as the front lot lines. The
Secretary explained that the joint property line between 6811 and 6827 Colfax Avenue
North would be more square with the location of the houses.
Chairman Lucht asked the applicant whether he had anything to add. Mr. John Werner
of 6827 Colfax Avenue North explained that the land was platted many years ago when
the area was farm land. He explained that he owns both lots at present and has a
garden partially on the 6811 property. He stated that the land transfer would put
all of that garden on the 6827 lot.
PUBLIC HEARING (Application No. 88008)
Chairman Lucht then opened the meeting for a public hearing. Seeing that there was
no one present to speak regarding the application, he called for a motion to close
the public hearing.
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
Motion by Commissioner Nelson seconded by Commissioner Bernards to close the public
hearing on Application No. 88008. The motion passed unanimously.
i 7 -14 -88 -1-
s
The Secretary explained to the Commission that the Subdivision Ordinance requires
platting of land and does not recognize divisions by metes and bounds description.
He explained that that was the reason a variance was required to accomplish a
division of land by metes and bounds. He explained that metes and bounds divisions
were only allowed in the case of land transfers and that new buildable lots would
have to be platted.
ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 88008 (John Werner)
Motion by Commissioner Nelson seconded by Commissioner Johnson to recommend
approval of Application No. 88008, subject to the following condition:
1. The City Council directs the City Assessor to amend the legal
description of 6811 and 6827 Colfax Avenue North to reflect the
land transfer upon filing with the County of the proposed
division.
Voting in favor: Chairman Lucht, Commissioners Bernards, Nelson and Johnson.
Voting against: none. The motion passed.
APPLICATION NO. 88007 (Robert Zappa)
The Secretary then introduced the next item of business, a request for site and
building plan approval by Robert Zappa to construct a 12 unit apartment building on
the land presently occupied by a four plex addressed as 6637 Humboldt Avenue North.
The Secretary reviewed the contents of the staff report (see Planning Commission
Information Sheet for Application No. 88007 attached) and also reviewed the
location of the site and briefly the proposed site plan.
Chairman Lucht asked the applicant whether he had anything to add. Mr. Robert Zappa
then addressed the Commission. He stated that there is a great need for three-
bedroom apartments in Brooklyn Center, perhaps because of the ordinance limitation
restricting three - bedroom apartments to no more than 10% of a multiple- family
complex. He pointed out that other cities do not limit three bedroom apartments.
He also pointed out that there are few multiple- family zoned lots remaining in
Brooklyn Center. He stated that 11 more three - bedroom apartment units will not
affect the City adversely.
Mr. Zappa went on to explain that he has looked at the cost of changing the project to
a two - bedroom unit complex. He stated that rents would be substantially lower and
that a two - bedroom complex would have cash flow problems and that this would hurt
maintenance of the property. He stated that there is a definite demand for three -
bedroom apartment units in the Metro area.
The Secretary explained that there hasn't been much apartment development in the
City since the moratorium on apartment construction in 1973 and 1974. He added that
most apartments in the City were built before the limitation on three - bedroom units
and that few three - bedroom units were built when there was no limitation on them.
Chairman Lucht stated that if a complex were destroyed by fire, the complex could be
rebuilt with all three - bedroom units if there was no limitation on the number of
three - bedroom units. The Secretary agreed, though he noted that there would be a
slightly greater land requirement.
Commissioner Johnson asked whether there has been any documentation of the need for
three - bedroom apartments. The Secretary answered that the Metropolitan Council
has indicated that there is a need for three - bedroom apartment units for large
family subsidized housing. He explained that, right now, this demand is being met
primarily by single - family homes.
7 -14-88 -2-
Chairman Lucht asked the Secretary how best to proceed. The Secretary answered
that the applicant could submit a variance if he is unwilling to change the design of
the apartment complex. He added, however, that he did not think the Standards for a
Variance would be met. He stated the other two options would be to table the
application and direct the applicant to change the design or to recommend denial.
Mr. Zappa explained that -
PP p a a two -bedroom m a artment complex is not financially
P P Y
feasible. He asked whether some allowance could be made for the fact that the other
building on the site requires 3,600 sq. ft. per unit as opposed to 2,700 sq. ft. per
unit for the units in the three - storey building. There followed a brief discussion
of the land requirements in which the Secretary explained that greater land area is
required for each unit in a two - storey building than in a three - storey building.
Chairman Lucht stated that the main problem was that the ordinance allows only 10% of
the units to be three bedroom. The Secretary then referred to the site plan and
pointed out that although a three - storey building requires less land area per unit,
three - bedroom units require slightly more than one or two - bedroom units in the same
building. He explained that part of the reason for this requirement was to provide
for recreation space on the site. He stated that there is very little recreation
area on the site as proposed. Commissioner Bernards agreed and referred to the
dicussion of the Planning Commission at the previous meeting in which recreational
space was strongly emphasized. Mr. Zappa stated that he would provide a play area
on the site.
Chairman Lucht asked the Commission for its comments. Commissioner Nelson stated
that it is a choice between denying the application or revising the plans and that it
is up to the applicant which of these he wants. Mr. Zappa asked whether the Planning
Commission would be open to a variance application on a one time basis. Chairman
Lucht stated that such a variance would create a precedent for other developments.
Commissioner Nelson stated that he doubted the Standards for a Variance would be "
met. The Secretary added that it appeared the Planning ommission wanted to st
Y
with the present ordinance with the limitation on three - bedroom units. t He stated
that a one time exception to this policy would be a bad choice. He told the
applicant that he has the right to submit a variance request, but added that he did
not feel the situation was unique and that the hardship was being created by the
applicant, rather than by the ordinance. He stated that the standards do not seem
to be met.
Commissioner Nelson stated that the applicant would have to make his case to the City
Council for an ordinance amendment. There followed a brief discussion of
procedures. Mr. Zappa asked whether other cities indicated that there were too
many three - bedroom units when they were surveyed as to their ordinance
requirements. The Planner stated that they were not asked specifically this
question, but that none of them did indicate that they had too many three - bedroom
units.
ACTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF APPLICATION NO. 88008 (Robert Zappa)
M
otion by Commissioner Nelson seconded by Commissioner Bernards to recommend denial
of Application No. 88008 submitted by Robert Zappa, on the grounds that the Zoning
Ordinance requirements relating to three - bedroom apartment units were not met in
this case. Voting in favor: Chairman Lucht, Commissioners Bernards, Nelson and
Johnson. Voting against: none. The motion passed.
DISCUSSION ITEM
a) Southwest Quadrant of Brooklyn Boulevard and I -94
The Secretary then addressed the Commission briefly regarding the vacant property
7 -14 -88 -3-
at the southwest quadrant of Brooklyn Boulevard and I -94• He noted that the site
was the site of the proposed Church on the Move which was proposed about three years
ago. He explained that there had been a rezoning application from R5 to C1 for the
property which the Planning Commission had recommended, but which the City Council
did not approve. He noted that the Church on the Move and an office condominium
development had been proposed for the property within the last five years, but that
neither had been built. He stated that the Comprehensive Plan recommends mid -
density residential or office development on the site. He explained, however, that
if there is a conflict between the zoning of the property and the recommendation of
the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning prevails. This would mean that an R5
development such as a three - storey apartment complex could be proposed and approved
for the site even though it does not conform with the Comprehensive Plan.
The Secretary explained that the strategy for Brooklyn Boulevard has been to not
rezone property unless a major development plan is proposed. He acknowledged that
there is risk involved with this strategy, that the land could be developed as zoned
rather than in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that the
Comprehensive Plan does not recommend three - storey apartment buildings in this area
as it is presently zoned. He added that there are very difficult access problems
and soil problems with the site which may make any sort of development difficult.
The Secretary stated that the City Council, at its June 27, 1988 meeting, discussed
the property and decided that they did not want to buy houses at this time to improve
the access to the large vacant property, but indicated a preference for rezoning the
property to either Cl or R3. Chairman Lucht noted that an R3 zoning would allow for
an office condominium development.
Commissioner Nelson noted that the Church on the Move included a rezoning to Cl which
was denied by the City Council. The Secretary explained that the rezoning was not
actually denied by the City Council. He explained that the Cl zoning was
recommended because it fit within the Comprehensive Plan and also allowed for
"religious uses" which would certainly include churches. The City Council,
however, balked at some of the service uses allowed in the Cl zone and asked for an
amendment to allow churches in the R5 zone instead of the rezoning. The church
eventually went elsewhere because of the soil and access problems on the site.
Commissioner Johnson inquired as to the state statute mentioned earlier. The
Secretary explained that the Comprehensive Plan may recommend one thing, but that
the zoning prevails which may allow something else. The Secretary explained that
the R5 zone allows both offices and townhouses which are recommended by the
Comprehensive Plan, but a permitted use - such as a three -storey apartment building
- is not recommended under the Comprehensive Plan.
In response to a question from Chairman Lucht regarding the Lescault property, the
Secretary explained that that property was recommended for Cl zoning. However, he
went on, it was not rezoned because it would make the home nonconforming. He cited
the example of the Bush's who wanted to add a porch onto their single - family home
which was zoned Cl in an area of Brooklyn Boulevard not far from the Lescault
residence. He explained that the Cl zoning prevented the expansion of a
nonconforming use. Commissioner Johnson asked what would happen with the R1
houses. The Secretary answered that if they were burned down, they could be
rebuilt. Commissioner Johnson asked whether that was what the City wanted. The
Secretary explained that Cl uses along Brooklyn Boulevard require one acre of land
and that the strategy has been to allow single - family uses to continue until a ma jor
development plan comes along which would incorporate service /office uses on one
acre parcels.
7 -14-88 -4-
Commissioner Bernards asked what were the concerns of the neighbors at I -94 and
Brooklyn Boulevard. The Secretary stated that one of the concerns was the
possibility of access being gained off Indiana Avenue to the west. He pointed out
that the City has taken a strong position that access must be a right -in /right -out
access off Brooklyn Boulevard and that no access will be allowed off Indiana Avenue.
The City Engineer pointed out that drainage from the site would be difficult because
of a small storm sewer line leading to the south. The Secretary also commented that
the church would be a tax - exempt use. Commissioner Nelson stated that it might be
tax - exempt, but that another use would very possibly involve a City subsidy and so
the City would wind up paying either way.
The Secretary stated that the staff would bring back a rezoning application and
asked for the Commission's suggestions as to what zone it should be. Chairman Lucht
pointed out that an R3 zoning would limit office developments to 1 112 stories and
that this might be preferable to the neighborhood. The Secretary pointed out that
the Cl zoning district would allow offices up to three stories in height.
Commissioner Nelson stated that there are parcels to look at along Brooklyn
Boulevard and that the City should get involved financially in purchasing some of
these older homes to prevent blight.
On a different matter, Commissioner Johnson asked how much the City received from
Hennepin County for improving the City's lakes. He stated that they spend 94% of
their money on Lake Minnetonka. The City Engineer stated that he did not know what
organization administers those funds. The Secretary added that the County
controls lakes that cross jurisdictional lines and that there are not that many in
Hennepin County.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Nelson seconded by Commissioner Bernards to adjourn the
meeting of the Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously. The Planning
Commission adjourned at 8:52 p.m.
Chairman
7 -14-88 -5-
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 88008
Applicant: John E. Werner
Location: 6811 and 6827 Colfax Avenue North
Request: Variance (Subdivision by metes and bounds)
The applicant requests a variance from the subdivision ordinance to transfer a
triangular parcel of land from 6811 to 6827 Colfax Avenue North by a metes and bounds
division. The property in question is zoned R1 and is bounded by Colfax Avenue
North on the east and by single - family homes on the south, west, and north.
Both of the lots in question have single- family homes on them. They are large lots
with 100.32 of frontage each. The house and attached garage at 6811 Colfax Avenue
North comply with all setback requirements from existing and proposed property
lines. The dwelling at 6827 is substandard as to setback from both the east (front)
and north (side) lot lines. However, these setbacks are not at issue in the
proposed transfer of land. A second detached garage at 6827 Colfax is presently set
back approximately 3' to 5' from the existing south side lot line. It will be set
back approximately 17.8' from the proposed south lot line with the transfer of land.
What is happening in the proposed land transfer is that the southwest corner of 6827
(also the northwest corner of 6811) Colfax is being moved 10' south of its current
location. The southeast corner of 6827 (also the northeast corner of 6811) Colfax
will remain the same. This new line creates a triangle of land to be conveyed to
6827 Colfax.
The existing legal description of the land in question is Lots 5 and 6, Block 1,
Morningside Estates 2nd Addition. The proposed division creates Parcels A and B, A
being Lot 5 plus that portion of Lot 6 lying north of the line described earlier and
Parcel B being that portion of Lot 6 lying south of that line. The resulting lot
areas are 14,004 sq. ft. for Parcel A and 12,673 sq. ft. for Parcel B. These lot
areas both exceed the minimum lot area for interior lots in the Rl zone (9,500 Sq.
ft.).
Generally, subdivisions by metes and bounds have been allowed provided that: a) no
new buildable lots are being created; b) the underlying land is platted property;
and c) no lot or setback variances are implied. Since all these conditions are met
in this case, staff recommend approval of the variance, subject to the following
condition.
1) The City Council directs the City Assessor to amend the legal
descriptions of 6811 and 6827 Colfax to reflect the land transfer
upon filing with the County of the proposed division.
is
7 -14-88
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 88007
Applicant: Robert Zappa
Location: 6637 Humboldt Avenue North
Request: Site and Building Plan
This application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its June 16, 1988
meeting and was tabled because the proposed apartment building would contain 11
three - bedroom units. Only one such unit is allowed by Section 35 -400 of the Zoning
Ordinance. The Commission asked for some background on the limitation in the
ordinance that no more than 10% of the units in a multiple- family dwelling can have
three bedrooms.
What we have discovered in reviewing the record is that the City declared a
moratorium on apartment construction in 1973. During the moratorium, the
regulations pertaining to multiple - family dwellings were studied, particularly
those relating to density. An ordinance amendment was adopted in August of 1974
which established new density requirements, including the following:
a) Computed allowable density exclusive of the land area lying
within setbacks abutting public streets. (This was repealed in
the early 1980's because it adversely affected smaller parcels
and corner lots disproportionately).
b) Allowed that the minimum land area for efficiency apartments
could be reduced by 250 sq. ft., but limited such units to no more
than 10% of the units in a multiple - family dwelling.
c) Required that the miniumum land area be increased by 250 sq. ft.
for each bedroom in excess of two in a multiple- dwelling unit and
limited such units to no more than 10% of the units in any multiple
dwelling. (The requirement for 250 sq. ft. of additional space
per bedroom in excess of two was part of the ordinance prior to
1974).
d) Allowed for a density credit of 500 sq. ft. for each required
parking stall in or under a multiple residence.
Taken together, these provisions tend to aim at providing more open space per
occupant of a multiple- family residential building. The minutes of the November
15, 1973 Planning Commission meeting indicate that the study was to look into:
"recreation area; light, air and view; open green space; and parking and storage
facilities," all related to the sense of density (see minutes of 11 -15 -73 Planning
Commission meeting, attached). The Commission then generally felt there should be
greater restrictions on three - bedroom developments as a means of controlling the
"density and distribution of population" which are legitimate means of regulation
as listed in the Zoning Ordinance Statement of Policy contained in Section 35 -100 of
the City Ordinances (attached). It appears that the concern was over the greater
activity levels and the need for on -site recreational facilities that three - bedroom
units tend to generate. Although there were further deliberations on the subject,
none are extensively reported in either the Planning Commission or City Council
minutes of 1973 and 1974. Some meetings of an ad hoc study group, including Housing
Commission and City Council members, were held however, we have no minutes of these
meetings.
7 -14-88 -1-
Application No. 88007 continued
We have also checked with 16 other suburban communities as to their regulations
pertaining to three - bedroom apartments. None of these communities has anything
similar to a 10% limit on three - bedroom units, but a number (8) have a land area
requirement which escalates somewhat with larger units or more bedrooms.
Three - bedroom apartments are relatively rare in Brooklyn Center, certainly far
under the 10% maximum envisioned by the Zoning Ordinance. But, there is also no
vehicle for transferring the unused development rights of other complexes to this
property. (It should also be noted that other complexes are generally built to the
maximum already and have little or no excess density credit to transfer, if that were
possible).
In conclusion, we do not recommend at this time any change in the Zoning Ordinance.
The present ordinance was arrived at after much study and discussion and even a
moratorium on apartment construction. It should not be amended or repealed
lightly. We, therefore, recommend that the applicant be directed to revise the
site and building plans to show only one three - bedroom unit. Otherwise, we would
have to recommend denial of the application as it presently stands on the basis that
the plan is in conflict with density provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
7 -14 -88 -2-
G I R A R 1 o
= O "� r ♦ ___) I D.
PTl
�-� � FREMOtiT PACE � -
FREMpNT s v , z r► EMERS�
o m o
O Z L -
r - -t z
EMERSON m - AVE
D
pUPONT
' m z J_ - r
� v --� , cn rn
pUPONT Z s
�C n� - - COLFAX 0� x
0
Z �r mm D I om x
m x V ` Z X ;1 Z I z
COLFAX k v _ _ .�� z�
mX m B RYAN
rt _ m r.
(A X
X
BRYANT
ALDRICN
CAM D L - p
ti EN .,
CAMDEN DR. 00
AVE. N
CAMDEN _ z
5T N ST.
�C z ROAD .0_ko 4
RIVER c eel
a►
���o��►aart�v u�
r �waae „ ot
R. ( WEST
L RI S A E gOLJ
GR _ _
77
wl
'Lo w +
WILLOW LA.
i33 4Z � I
N 89° 53' 35" W
C,
PARCEL q
SQ. FT. 14,004
I
WO OI � A
WN N ( N y
rn
i
X
N o.-S� L�h�
PARCEL B N.E.
Lo+ 6
SQ. FT. 12,673
I
rn
0 0 d
' r N u
N
� � m
I � �
' 133.
N. 89 ° 53 35" W
9. The plans shall be modified prior to consideration by the City
Council to indicate a parking delineator (B612 curb and gutter)
at the east end of the row of parking along the north side of the
lot (in the newly paved area).
10. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes,
ordinances and regulations and any violation thereof shall be
grounds for revocation.
11. Parking of cars on the north portion of the property by off -site
auto dealerships is strictly prohibited unless and until a
separate special use permit is granted for such use.
12. The conveyance of additional runoff from the expanded parking lot
to the I -6914 right -of -way is subject to approval by MN /DOT.
Voting in favor: Chairman Pro tem Mike Nelson, Commissioners Malecki, Bernards,
Wallerstedt and Johnson. Voting against: none. The motion passed.
APPLICATION NO. 88007 (Robert Zappa)
The Secretary introduced the next item of business, a request for site and building
plan approval for a 12 unit apartment building at approximately 6637 Humboldt Avenue
North. The Secretary reviewed the staff report (see Planning Commission
Information Sheet for Application No. 88007 attached). He stated there is a
problem with the plan showing 11 three bedroom units due to the fact that the
ordinance requires 250 sq. ft. of additional land area for each unit with over two
bedrooms and limits such units to 10% of the units in any multiple dwelling. Based
on this requirement. he stated, only one three bedroom unit would be allowed.
Commissioner Johnson asked why there is a restriction placed on number of three
bedroom units. The Secretary responded that he assumed the reason for these
limitations was a method of controlling density in mult- family zoning districts.
He added that there is the potential for more occupants in complexes with three
bedroom units and possibly more traffic and other activity associated with
multiple - family use of property. He further added that the ordinance also reduces
the density of an apartment by 250 sq. ft. per unit for efficiency units and limits
these to no more than 10% of the total also. He pointed out that the ordinance was
probably designed to provide a mix of units with mostly one and two bedrooms and to
avoid over concentrations of efficiency and three bedroom units.
Chairman Pro tem Nelson asked the applicant if he had anything to add. Robert
Zappa, owner and developer of the property, stated he had contacted the Metropolitan
HRA and was informed there is a shortage of apartment buildings with three bedroom
units and that he was encouraged to provide such units. He stated he would rent to
low income families and is attempting to provide units that fill a void in the area.
He also stated that the correct number of garages to be built should be 17.
Commissioner Johnson asked if the number of occupants in an apartment can legally be
limited. Mr. Zappa stated that he thought it could and would be willing to limit the
number of occupants if that was a concern to the City.
In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Bernards, Mr. Zappa stated that he has had
no problems renting to low income, large families in other buildings that he owns.
He stated he intends to install a fence to avoid problems with surrounding
neighbors. He added the color of the new apartment building. would be the same as
the blue /gray combination proposed for the existing building. The Secretary
pointed out that he did not believe the City could impose any special occupancy
6 -16 -88 -6-
restrictions other than those already contained in the Housing Maintenance and
Occupancy Ordinance. He also recommended that decision not be made on whether or
not the apartment is to be for low income people.
The Secretary stated there are three options: an ordinance amendment, the
p e , applicant
has the right to seek a variance, or it can be left alone. He stated tabling may be
appropriate in order to give staff time to research for background information.
Chairman Pro tem Nelson
polled the Commissioners for their opinions. Commissioner
Bernards stated he considered the 250 sq. ft. density an important factor.
Commissioner Malecki asked for clarification of the basis for the 10% figure.
Commissioner Bernards added a play area is needed. Commissioner Wallerstedt
stated she was also in favor of providing a play area. Chairman Pro tem Nelson
stated he was in favor of an ordinance amendment and further research. He asked how
much land is available in the R4 and R5 districts. The Secretary responded vacant
land is scare in Brooklyn Center.
ACTION TABLING APPLICATION NO. 88007 (Robert Zappa)
Motion by Commissioner Bernards seconded by Commissioner Malecki to table
Application No. 88007 to allow staff to research background information. Voting in
favor: Chairman Pro tem Nelson, Commissioners Malecki, Bernards, Wallerstedt, and
Johnson. Voting against: none. The motion passed.
DISCUSSION ITEM
a) Theatre Parking Ordinance Amendment
This ordinance amendment provides a change from one space for three seats to one
space for four seats in the parking requirement for theatres located in a shopping
center.
ACTION APPROVING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
Motion by Commissioner Bernards seconded by Commissioner Malecki to recommend
approval of the draft ordinance amendment as submitted. Voting in favor:
Chairman Pro tem Nelson, Commissioners Malecki, Bernards, Wallerstedt and Johnson.
Voting against: none. The motion passed.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Wallerstedt seconded by Commissioner Malecki to adjourn the
meeting of the Planning Commission. Voting in favor: Chairman Pro tem Nelson,
Commissioners Malecki, Bernards, Wallerstedt and Johnson. The motion passed.
The Planning Commission adjourned at 10:05 p.m.
Chairman
6 -16 -88 -7-
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 88007
Applicant: Robert Zappa
Location: 6637 Humboldt Avenue North
Request: Site and Building Plan
Location /Zoning
The applicant requests site and building plan approval for a 12 unit apartment
building at approximately 6637 Humboldt Avenue North. The property in question is
zoned R5 and is bounded on the north by a collection of 4 four - plexes, on the east by
Humboldt Avenue North, on the south by the Berean Evangelical Free Church and
parsonage, and on the west by the Spec. 7 industrial building. The apartment
building is to be three stories. Three - storey apartment buildings are permitted
uses in the R5 zoning district.
There is an existing two - storey four -plex already on the property. Under the
Zoning Ordinance, two - storey apartment buildings are also permitted in the R5 zone,
but at the R4 density of 12 units per acre (or 1 unit per 3,600 sq. ft.). The
existing four -plex, therefore, requires 14,400 sq. ft. of land area. This leaves
34,308 sq. ft. for the three - storey building. At 2,700 sq. ft. per unit (the R5
density), 12.7 additional units could be allowed. Therefore, 12 additional units
can be built on the site.
The proposed plans call for 11 three - bedroom units and one two - bedroom handicapped
unit. This collection of units, however, is not permitted under Section 35 -400 of
the Zoning Ordinance. Footnote lc of that section requires 250 sq. ft. of
additional land area for each unit with over two bedrooms and limits such units to
10% of the units in any multiple dwelling. This provision limits the number of
three - bedroom units to only one of the 12 proposed. We have informed the developer
of this problem and he has asked for a review by the Planning Commission, though no
variance has yet been submitted. Staff would oppose a variance and recommend that
the plans be tabled until revised plans are submitted without the excess number of
three - bedroom units.
Access /Parking
The site gains access off Humboldt Avenue North via an existing 24' wide driveway
along the south side of the site. The proposed building will be located where much
of the existing parking is. The plan calls for 16 surface parking stalls, nine at 90
adjacent to the new building and seven parallel stalls along the south side of the
lot. A 15' wide buffer strip along the south side of the property is provided as
required adjacent to Rl zoned property. The plan also calls for 18 garage stalls in
two buildings on the west end of the site. Between garage parking and surface
parking, therefore, the parking requirement of two stalls per unit is met.
i
Landscaping
The landscape plan calls for the preservation of numerous trees on the site,
especially a number of large existing Elms. The policy of the City has been to
disregard Elms as meeting any landscape requirements. Since there will be a total
of 16 dwelling units on the site, section 35 -410 requires a minimum of three 6"
diameter trees on the site. This requirement is met by three large existing
Willows, two large existing Cottonwoods and a large existing Ash. The plan
proposes six Black Hills Spruce, north of the proposed building in the setback area
off the north lot line. Four Russian Olives are proposed in the open area west of
the proposed building and east of the proposed seven-stall parking garage.
6 -16-88 -1-
Application No. 88007 continued
Potentillas and Globe and Pyramidal Arborvitae are proposed for foundation
plantings along the south side of the new building. Four Junipers and two Pyramidal
Arborvitae are scheduled in front of the existing building. The total point value
of the non -Elm landscaping is 122.5 points. The site is required to have 102 points
based on the landscape point system. Therefore, the proposed landscape plan is
sufficient, provided that existing non -Elm trees are counted. Areas to be
disturbed by construction are to be sodded. As to screening from the R1 property to
the south, the applicant has indicated a desire to fence the property on the north,
west, and south sides, but this fence is not shown on the plans. A chain link fence
already exists around the church parsonage.
Grading, Drainage, Utilities
The grading plan calls for one new catch basin south of the easterly garage which
will take drainage from the surface parking area and the paved area between the two
proposed garages. Also, the lawn area west of the proposed apartment building and
east of the easterly garage will drain over a flattened curb at the southeast corner
of the easterly garage. The plan does not actually call for B612 curb and gutter,
but the architect has indicated orally that curb and gutter is planned around all
parking and driving areas. The plan also calls for a 2 water service (which will
provide minimum pressure) and a 6 sanitary sewer service. The location of these
services is very close to a row of large existing Elms which the landscape plan calls
for preserving. The precise location of these service lines may, therefore, need
to be revised somewhat northward.
Building
As mentioned earlier, the plans call for 11 three - bedroom units in the proposed
apartment building. This is 10 more than permitted under the Zoning Ordinance and,
without a variance, we cannot recommend approval of the plans as submitted. The
proposed exterior treatment would be 8 wide horizontal exposure wood, with
vertical ribbed exterior plywood above the third floor level. Each unit is to have
either a patio (first floor) or deck (2nd and 3rd floors) with sliding glass doors.
An exterior light is proposed in all of these deck /patio areas. The roof is a gable
roof running north /south along the length of the building. The existing building
has a brick front and 8 horizontal boned siding on the other three sides. It is
presently being painted a light blue. It has a hip roof. The Commission may wish
to discuss with the applicant the aesthetic compatibility of the two.structures.
It is certainly a valid question.
Lighting /Trash
In addition to exterior lights on the building, three sets of 75 watt flood lights
are proposed on the garages, two sets on the larger 10 stall garage and one on the
smaller seven stall garage. Also, a 200 watt incandescent lamp is proposed on a 10'
high pole at the southwest corner of the new building. A dumpster with an enclosure
is proposed at the southeast corner of the smaller, easterly garage.
Conclusion
Again, staff recommend tabling the application at this time because of the number of
three - bedroom units in the proposed building. The Planning Commission may wish to
discuss with the applicant the merits, if there are any, for a variance to allow more
three- bedroom units. None occur to us at the writing of this report. (Note:
Three - bedroom units require 250 sq. ft. of additional land under Section 35 -400.
Based on this requirement, only 8 units could be three - bedroom even if the 10% cap
were lifted.
6 -16 -88 -2-
MINUTES OF TFiF P?'OCEEDINGS OF TFrE
rLA17NT7 G .^i. ".MTSSI HE
�' OF T CI'1'�' OF
^T;N�; ?R T`- Tr T CnrJN2^;r . -F
H!'NNi:_T`IN AI'D TATF. OF° MITTN- �'SOTA
SPECIAL SESSION
CITY ILALL
NOVEMBER 15, 1973
:all to Order: The Planning CcTM?nission met in special
scssicn and was called to order by
Chairman rc, crt Jensen at 8:00 P.M.
-.o11 Call:
Jensen,
Cc ^ ^issieners Eogucki
t, 0:3
and
:p , c,�
cnt. ;eas Director of
"1 and Inspection Blair Tremens.
pprcve Minutes: Motion by Cct
11 -8 -73 rni i
ssor_er Scott seconded by
Commissioner Foreman to approve the
minutes of the Nc !emb 8, 197 meeting
as submitted. Voting i_r fa.vor were
Chairman Jensen, Commissioners Poaucki,
Foreman, Scott, Gross and Engdahl. Not
voting: COmmissioner Grosshans who ex-
plained he was not present at that
meeting. The motion passed.
sc;scion of Chairman Jenson
:1ti Residential to that the meeting
had been called to consider the status
acing Study of the studv ordered by the City Council
on July 23, 197 ?, z;t Which time a 120-
day moratorium on all multi- residential
development not yet- aDorcved bv the
Cciincil was dcc7.a °,d,
The Secreta -y stared that the Council
had -sked that a s Idy be made OF
ordinance provisions recarding the
following factors for the F, -3 through
R -7 districts: recreation area; lig
air, and vies•?; open g er.n .^sacs and '
pa.rki.nc and storage facilities. The
Secretary further stated that these
factors, tal=on toact':c� , -e ,-
presented
what was Often tormec? "r ", and he
stated the app -oach of tl -e toning
Ordinance was the stipulation for a
minimum land area requirement based on
the number Of uni_tS in a deyelopmc nt.
He commented further that the ordinance
did not specifically stipirlatc the
allocati f - r
iOn o._ tine area o .'r
a site to uses
such as recr cn area, open c_77rean
space, and storage facilities. He stated
that parking was provided through the re-
quirement of a mi -iMU -1 number of sraces
per unit. and t'_iat there x.- certain rc-
quirements for landscaping, setback, and
buffer zones.
The Secretary also stated that beyond the
requirement. that 250 additional square
feet must be added to the m.i nia,nm 1and
-1- _11/15/73
area for each bedroom in excess of two,
there was no ordinance provision govern -
ing the size of apartment units -.r the
density of the number of occur nts.
He stated that one of the b - - >>_c concerns
voiced by the Council ar -i . - Commission
had been the need to a«. provi. ion
for basic amenities it? riven proj?ct
specifically in relatio.. to the number
and size of the dwe). ?.-. *:g units.
The Secretary comm<-,zted further that
this relationshin -ias a basic issue in
the City's effort: to provide for quality
housing. He explained that if the City
were to provide for three or more bed-
room apartments, primarily oriented to-
wards family use, then it would seem
desirable to incorporate more stringent
density- - related Zoning Ordinance requir.-
ments.
He added that there were serious ques-
tions as to whether three or more bed -
room units in the R -4 and R -5 types o,
multiple family dwellings were desir.-.i_:I.e
at all.
During an extensive discussion Commis-
sioner Grosshans inquired as to ordinance
rea?i.irements for minimum area of &%— fling
units. The Secretary responded tha.c-
wh _le the building cod.^ c id make cr -tain
general minimum provi - .. - -;:s as to = com
s -7:es and capacitie apartment. nits,
ti=re were not pr ons relatin :: the
m•.-ber or size c ::its to the si_e or
d :7ree of amen for the occv�:nts.
C':'- nirs:,n Jer -gin stated that the basic
Gr:ctsti.on o- density of multiple family
dwellings in re1_:r_ien to the size of the
site. and the :.:unities provided, demon-
stra �ted ' ?: r.c�= a to adopt more restric-
tip n r:ul -idential housing recruire-
rrencr -.
f
Ir_ further discussion, Commissioner
Enadorl ,ggested the possibility of a
for:; ilierebv the ordinance would re-
qu ire i: average minimum size for units
in a Arvelopment, as well as a maximum
average number of bedrooms in the de-
velopment. commissioner Foreman stated
that another approach might be through a
planned unit development concept whereby
site and building plans for the remain-
ing R -3 through R -7 zoned land in the
City would be considered on its own
merits, and would possibly provide for
various modes of living units.
Chairman Jensen stated that three
specific proposals which might be con-
sidered were:
1. Requirement that there be at
,f
least on enclosed garage per
unit, intended for storage pur-
poses as well as for parking.
2. The minimum land area requirement
for bedrooms in excess of two !
would be increased from that in i
the present ordinance; and
furthermore, a specific require-
ment be made as to the provision
for minimum living area in the
units.
3. That a "fixed coverage" r ge" concept
for sites be adopted relating
the maximum amount of land which
could be devoted to buildings
and parking purposes, thereby
more precisely defining the
density as well as providing
j:
for a definite minimum amount of
land to be used for recreational
and open space purposes.
�I
ss: The meeting recessed at 9:30 P.M. and
resumed at 9 :55 p.M.
Chairman Jensen asked the Secretary to
review a zoning map noting the remaining
undeveloped parcels throughout the City
which were zoned R -3 through R -7. An �(
extensive discussion ensued. i
Chairman Jensen stated that it was ap-
parent from the discussion that the
I
primary concern focused upon the R -4 and ki
R -5 districts, and that the basic point
of contention was the r�
p ovision for !I
family oriented units which had more than
two bedrooms.
Chairman Jensen then proceeded to poll
the Commission as to the possible approach !
which,might be taken either prohibiting
or further restricting developments
featuring more than two bedrooms. Com-
missioner Bogucki stated that in his
opinion, three or more'bedroom units
should only be allowed with separate
restrictive standards. Commissioner
Foreman stated that he could not see any
legal way in which large multiple bed-
room units could be prohibited, but that (
he would consider development of more I
restrictive requirements. Commissioner
Gross stated that large family oriented !
units which involved more than two bed -
rooms should be subject to more stringent
requirements, and he noted the possibility E!
of developing a special use permit concept.
Commissioner Grosshans stated that he felt
the requirements for developments featur-
ing multiple bedroom units should be very r!
restrictive.
{
-3- 11/15/73
,nsus to Continue Chairman Jen::en determined that it was
•and to Direct the consensus of the Commission to con-
:er Data tinue the discussion and study of
ordinance density requirements relative
to multi - residential housing and that
the 5ecretar�- should be directed to
develop further data based on require-
ments of other communities.
n Requesting Motion b
Multi Residential y COrunissioner Gross seconded by
Commissioner Bogucki to recommend that
.opment Moratorium the City Couicii extend the moratorium
tended on multi- residentia housing development
for sixty (60) days. Chairman Jensen
stated that the Commission should note
the Ccuncil ° U direction that there was a
need to gain broad input, namely from
the row Housing Commission and the Neigh-
borhood Advisory Groups. He then called
for a tote. The motion passed
unani:aously.
Isus Regarding In other business it was the consensus
per Meeting of the Commission that the Decemrer 6,
1973 regular meeting should commence at
7 :30 P.M. in consideration of the large
number of agenda items.
mment Motion by Commissioner Engdahl seconded
by Commissioner Foreman to adjourn the
meeting. The motion passed unanimoixsly.
The Plannincf Commission meeting adjourn-
ed at 11:25 p.M.
Chai an
-4- 11/15/73
�r
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
ORDINANCE NO. 74-17
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES
RELATIVE TO MINIMUM LAND AREA REQUIREMENTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Section 35 -400 (1) is hereby amended to read as follows:
(1) In the case of residential uses, the minimum land area shall apply to
each dwelling unit, [ except that such minimum land area shall be reduced by 25
per cent in the case of efficiency units.] [No more than 10 per cent of the total
number of dwelling units in a multiple dwelling may be efficiency units.] [The
minimum land area] and shall be computed and adjusted as follows:
(a) [ For each required parking stall in or under a multiple
residence or otherwise completely underground, sub-
tract 500 square feet from the required total minimum
land area.] Computation of the maximum number of
units on a proposed site in the R -4, R-5, R -6 and R -7
Districts shall be exclusive of the aggregate area of
all yard setbacks abutting streets as required by the
Zoning Ordinance for said site.
(b) [For each bedroom in excess of two in any one multiple
family dwelling unit, add 250 square feet to the required
total minimum land area.] The minimum land area
required per unit shall be reduced by 250 square feet per
efficiency unit in a multiple family dwelling; and -no more
than 10 per cent of the units in such a dwelling may be
efficiency units.
Section 2: Section 35 -400 (1) (c) is hereby designated as Section 35 -400
(1) (e) .
Section 3: Section 35 -400 (1) is hereby amended by the addition of the
following:
(c) The required total minimum land area may be reduced
500 square feet for each required parking stall in or
under a multiple residence or otherwise completely
underground.
ORDINANCE NO. 74 -17
(d) The required total minimum land area shall be increased
250 square feet for each bedroom in excess of two in
any one multiple family dwelling unit, and no more than
10 per cent of the units in any multiple dwelling shall
have more than two bedrooms.
Section 4: This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon
thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this 5th day of August 1974.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Published in the official newspaper ly 1 R, 1 974
Effective date Artist, 17, 1974
(Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.)
sm
...,. ■ ■mom■■ .■_ ■ ■■
WARM
■■ � tl � � � i � � ��
RVING LA ' ■ ■
1 W'w
BROOKLYN CENTER
�• HIGH SCHOOL •.4 ■�
►�1 ♦ 4 - •
�
WE
i■�i
v
EX, u1L EX, UIL Ex. CDT I -EX, OAK
------------------------
X• LM V EX. ;IL Ex. 0 n
1
i k r I
EX. fLM ✓
i
, t
I
t I
f i 1
I '
1
1 °I 0 I (
i
, j 1
I � '
1 I I^
r,
°
<L � 1 RD RO �� i x
I � PC R0�!� I I 1
1
i j 6 POT
- -- / 5 BLS
�
IS GA
j / t
1
EX. EL'Lts� ��
`x I
��� I FA ' t
Ex. Ei
NOTE
GROUNDS DISTURBED BY
1 � CONSTRUCTION ARE TO
BE SODDED. �
Ex. Eqm EX. ELM
1
, _ 1
EX. ELM Ex. C
1
Ex, EUM f (
r EX. ELM i
EX. ELM
I I
EX. ELF = i
1
1
� r EX. ELM
1 I '
I I PA� � I
PA
4 JN _ -r
E.Y. ELM
i
t 7l Et EL I
MXI ASN,i
d----- - - - - -- ----------------------------------- - - - -d'
HUMBOLDT AVE. N.
CITY 4141 Douglas Drive North • Crystal, MN 55422 - 1696.537 -8421
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
July 7, 1988
Mr. Gerald Splinter, City Manager
City of Brooklyn_ Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Mn 55430
Dear Mr. Splinter:
As a follow -up to the City Council resolution recently sent
to your attention, a resident petition is attached regarding
the channel dredging between Middle and Lower Twin Lake.
Both the resolution and petition reflect the importance with
which Crystal views this matter. Given the long history of
. interaction between municipalities and other agencies on
issues related to Twin Lake, Crystal is requesting Robbins -
dale, Brooklyn Center, MnDOT and the Department of Natural
Resources respond to our request that the depth of the
dredged channel be reduced.
Your attention to this item of mutual interest is
ppreciated.
IT
terry 4ulgar,/
,t ity Manager'
JD : j rs
Encl
cc: Mayor Dean Nyquist
PETITION TO THE CRYSTAL CITY COUNCIL
I, John Schaaf of 4908 Quail Ave. No. a resident of Crystal and the circulator
of this petition do hereby petition with my fellow neighbors hereafter listed
that the Crystal City Council look into and pursue whatever relief possible for
the following injurious situation that has developed:
That the City of Robbinsdale has, without any public hearing or notification
to the residents of Crystal requested and authorized that the Minnesota Department
of Highways conduct a dredging operation and channelization project between the
lower and middle portions of Twin Lake; namely under the Highway 100 bridge.
The adverse implications to Crystal residents are as follows
1.) The lake is used extensively by swimmers, sailboarders, sailors,
paddleboats, canoes and small fishing boats. There has been an
ongoing safety problem for the past years with high speed-boat
traffic that the cities have been unable to regulate. We feel that
this channel dredging project will serve to greatly accentuate the
safety problems that now exist.
2.) A further lowering of lake levels having a detrimental effect on
the cities water table and the shoreline's ecology.
3.) Opening up a new deep water channel where none has existed in the
last twenty years leading to increased high speed powerboat traffic
on both portions of the lake which has in the past been opposed
unanimously by the City Councils of Crystal, Brooklyn Center, and
Robbinsdale after extensive resident complaints.
We hereby respectfully request that the Crystal City Council use whatever means
it deems necessary to provide relief from this situation; namely to request
Robbinsdale to restore the channel to what existed before Robbinsdale's ill
advised action.
Submitted this date, July 5, 1988, by the following:
NAME ADDRESS
t7 q ZIQ ��,��� A�� Y�_ C� Sala► �U1tJ
l , //// T
?d
7 1
PETITION TO THE CRYSTAL CITY COUNCIL
I, John Schaaf of 4908 Quail Ave. No. a resident of Crystal and the circulator
of this petition do hereby petition with my fellow neighbors hereafter listed
that the Crystal City Council look into and pursue whatever relief possible for
the following injurious situation that has developed:
That the City of Robbinsdale has, without any public hearing or notification
to the residents of Crystal requested and authorized that the Minnesota Department
of Highways conduct a dredging operation and channelization project between the
lower and middle portions of Twin Lake; namely under the Highway 100 hridge.
The adverse implications to Crystal residents are as follows
1.) The lake is used extensively by swimmers, sailboarders, sailors,
paddleboats, canoes and small fishing boats. There has been an
ongoing safety problem for the past years with high speed boat
traffic that the cities have been unable to regulate. We feel that
this channel dredging project will serve to greatly accentuate the
safety problems that now exist.
2.) 'A further lowering of lake levels having a detrimental effect on
the cities water table and the shorel ecology.
3.) Opening up a new deep water channel where none has existed in the
last twenty years leading to increased high speed powerboat traffic
on both portions of the lake which has in the past been opposed
M unanimously by the City Councils of Crystal, Brooklyn Center, and
Robbinsdale after extensive resident complaints.
We hereby respectfully request that the Crystal City Council use whatever means
it deems necessary to provide relief from this situation; namely to request
Robbinsdale to restore the channel to what existed before Robbinsdale's ill
advised action.
Submitted this date, July 5, 1988, by the following:
NAME ADD RESS
A -41
> ice' �CJ �) ✓ '��i ��.
G
PETITION TO THE CRYSTAL CITY COUNCIL
I, John Schaaf of 4908 Quail Ave. No. a resident of Crystal and the circulator
of this petition do hereby petition with my fellow neighbors hereafter listed
that the Crystal City Council look into and pursue whatever relief possible for
the following injurious situation that has developed:
That the City of Robbinsdale has, without any public hearing or notification
to the residents of Crystal requested and authorized that the Minnesota Department
of Highways conduct a dredging operation and channelization project between the
lower and middle portions of Twin Lake; namely under the Highway 100 bridge.
The adverse implications to Crystal residents are as fol
1.) The lake is used extensively by swimmers, sailboarders, sailors,
paddleboats, canoes and small fishina boats. There has been an
ongoing safety problem for the past years with high speed boat
traffic that the cities have been unable to regulate. We feel that
this channel dredging project will serve to greatly accentuate the
safety problems that now exist.
2.) A further lowering of lake levels having a detrimental effect on
the cities water table and the shoreline's ecology.
3.) Opening up a new deep water channel where none has existed in the
last twenty years leading to increased high speed powerboat traffic
on both portions of the lake which has in the past been opposed
unanimously by the City Councils of Crystal, Brooklyn Center, and
Robbinsdale after extensive resident complaints.
We hereby respectfully request that the Crystal City Council use whatever means
it deems necessary to provide relief from this situation; namely to request
Robbinsdale to restore the channel to what existed before Robbinsdale's ill
advised action.
Submitted this date, July 5, 1988, by the following:
NAME ADDRESS
ee
c
PETITION TO THE CRYSTAL CITY COUNCIL
I, John Schaaf of 4908 Quail Ave. No. a resident of Crystal and the circulator
of this petition do hereby petition with my fellow neighbors hereafter listed
that the Crystal City Council look into and pursue whatever relief possible for
the following injurious situation that has developed:
That the City of Robbinsdale has, without any public hearing or notification
to the residents of Crystal requested and authorized that the Minnesota Department
of Highways conduct a dredging operation and channelization project between the
lower and middle portions of Twin Lake; namely under the Highway 100 hridge.
The adverse implications to Crystal residents are as follows
1.) The lake is used extensively by swimmers, sailboarders, sailors,
paddleboats, canoes and small fishing boats. There has been an
ongoing safety problem for the past vears with high speed.boat
traffic that the cities have been unable to regulate. We feel that
this channel dredging project will serve to greatly accentuate the
safety problems that now exist.
2.) A further lowering of lake levels having a detrimental effect on
the cities water table and the shoreline's ecology.
3.) Opening up a new deep water channel where none has existed in the
last twenty years leading to increased high speed powerboat traffic
on both portions of the lake which has in the past been opposed
t unanimously by the City Councils of Crystal, Brooklyn Center, and
Robbinsdale after extensive resident complaints.
We hereby respectfully request that the Crystal City Council use whatever means
it deems necessary to provide relief from this situation; namely to request
Robbinsdale to restore the channel to what existed before Robbinsdale's ill
advised action.
Submitted this date, July 5, 1988, by the following:
NAME ADDRESS
XIC
l
PETITION TO THE CRYSTAL CITY COUNCIL
I, John Schaaf of 4908 Quail Ave. No. a resident of Crystal and the circulator
of this petition do hereby petition with my fellow neighbors hereafter listed
that the Crystal City Council look into and pursue whatever relief possible for
the following injurious situation that has developed:
That the City of Robbinsdale has, without any public hearing or notification
to the residents of Crystal requested and authorized that the Minnesota Department
of Highways conduct a dredging operation and channelization project between the
lower and middle portions of Twin Lake; namely under the Highway 100 bridge.
The adverse implications to Crystal residents are as follows
l.) The lake is used extensively by swimmers, sailboarders, sailors,
paddleboats, canoes and small fishing boats. There has been an
ongoing safety problem for the past years with high speed boat
traffic that the cities have been unable to regulate. We feel that
this channel dredging project will serve to greatly accentuate the
safety problems that now exist.
2.) A further lowering of lake levels having a detrimental effect on
the cities water table and the shoreline's ecology.
3.) Opening up a new deep water channel where none has existed in the
last twenty years leading to increased high speed powerboat traffic
on both portions of the lake which has in the past been opposed
unanimously by the City Councils of Crystal, Brooklyn Center, and
Robbinsdale after extensive resident complaints.
We hereby respectfully request that the Crystal City Council use whatever means
it deems necessary to provide relief from this situation; namely to request
Robbinsdale to restore the channel to what existed before Robbinsdale's ill
advised action.
Submitted this date, July 5, 1988, by the following:
NAME ADDRESS
de
t�
PETITION TO THE CRYSTAL CITY COUNCIL
I, John Schaaf of 4908 Quail Ave. No. a resident of Crystal and the circulator
of this petition do hereby petition with my fellow neighbors hereafter listed
that the Crystal City Council look into and pursue whatever relief oossible for
the following injurious situation that has developed:
That the City of Robbinsdale has, without any DUblic hearing or notification
to the residents of Crystal requested and authorized that the Minnesota Department
of Highways conduct a dredging operation and channelization project between the
lower and middle portions of Twin Lake; namely under the Highway 100 hrid.ge.
The adverse implications to Crystal residents are as follows `
1.) The lake is used extensively by swimmers, sailboarders, sailors,
paddleboats, canoes and small fishing boats. There has been an
ongoing safety problem for the past years with high speed-boat
traffic that the cities have been unable to regulate. We feel that
this channel dredging project will serve to greatly accentuate the
safety problems that now exist.
2.) A further lowering of lake levels having a detrimental effect on
the cities water table and the shoreline's ecology.
3.) Opening up a new deep water channel where none has existed in the
last twenty years leading to increased high speed powerboat traffic
on both portions of the lake which has in the past been opposed
unanimously by the City Councils of Crystal, Brooklyn Center, and
Robbinsdale after extensive resident complaints.
We hereby respectfully request that the Crystal City Council use whatever means
it deems necessary to provide relief from this situation; namely to request
Robbinsdale to restore the channel to what existed before Robbinsdale's ill
advised action.
Submitted this date, July 5, 1988, by the following:
NAME ADDRESS
� Yj - 7� Z
��
�O� U
HENNEP!N COUNTY R EGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY
A -2307 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN. 55487 -0237 612/348 -4077
July 14, 1988
Mr. Gerald G. Splinter
Manager, City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
RE: Advisory Committee Membership
Anoka /Hennepin Northeast Corridor Study
Dear Mr. Splinter:
The regional railroad authorities of Anoka County ( ACRRA) and Hennepin County
( HCRRA) have agreed to undertake the comprehensive study of a light rail transit
corridor which would link Anoka County with downtown Minneapolis.
In order to have the benefit of input from all affected communities and agencies,
the railroad authorities are jointly forming advisory committees in three
categories:
o Intergovernmental Advisory Committee (IAC). This Committee will
address major issues brought before the Committee and provide guidance
to the railroad authorities regarding the conduct and direction of the
study.
0 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). The TAC, composed of staff from
affected communities and agencies, will evaluate technical issues
which arise during the study, provide technical advice to the railroad
authorities, and advise the IAC on technical issues.
o Corridor Advisory Committees (CAC). There will be a CAC composed of
representatives of affected communities. Each will consider issues
relevant to the geographic area they represent.
The HCRRA asks that you appoint one person from your staff to the
Technical Advisory Committee. Please inform the HCRRA of the names of
your appointees by Monday, August 22, 1988. A letter has also been sent
to your Mayor asking for appointments to the IAC and CAC.
We appreciate your participation in this planning process and look forward
to working with you and your appointees. If you have any questions,
please call me or Vern Genzlinger (348- 4306).
Sincerely,
p rtz
ha
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Jeff Spartz Sam S. Sivanich John E. Derus Mark Andrew Randy Johnson John Keefe E. F. Robb, Jr.
Chairman Vice Chairman Treasurer Secretary
cc
a CHAMPLIN 'N IS
�$SA BLAINE ` r } '
RAPIDS
3'
••' _ •.. "•.••. N I
�LEXEXNG�T(M
CIRCLE -r
PI
,r NES(" 1
- - rs - .75a � u " � — _ — I L..• r R• +�`.r. t
VI LnL
a �"• "` BROOKLYN O F~ f AAR +: % • •� [!
PARK q r3
VIEW
. �� � • '< • t l r .,• j •' Pdm. Y f )) a t ` Lo., •SHOREVIEW
tom- OOKLY L,..
CENTER wa ,
.:l � ufW.r v • V 7fnr,n a u
., ke •:;.;,\ i. NEW G. l
•� :•i;;iL�, 'U: O A A LL. ; RIGHTO. [� r,r.nel
to ye � :r: ••.�^ 7..n �� v . H � r _' .' ' :: - �(. i�a.eod _ _s •fs..
:.
•;,.• r top c .r
LUIv w,e..•
>HEI 5 L '�
�Ew HOP , .n r ^. t R a~i S , Z — m L,k, q <
r` , CRYST c.t tun, — / r ,
L'
wl INSD ' L n w,
`.� , .r 1 s ♦ s LjQ s NTHONI
:o +c ,. «. g ab •., .
r;
.•tea \� Grr i ' ' �( � /KI
I x M I LN L I S — <' ROSEVILLF
- • t y
LAKE ;,� `t +r7f;7 1, 7DERDALF - c
«,... ' -` - II {l� ..r • y \•\\a..�{s, FALCON
ry
woo
v
i
h .•
.. r:
I n o oka/Hennepin Northeast Corridor Study Alternative Alignments
and Comprehensive LRT System Plan to be Analyzed
Pa*ation /Communication Process # .
State
F— - -- Legislature
Anoka. Co. Hennepin County
= nal Reegni al Rai'Iroad
Authority Authority
Ramsey Co. Cities Metrosolitan RTB �
Railroad CoUn
Authority Executive
Committee
®e
Intergovernmental
Advisory
Committee
General Corridor Technical
Public Advisory Advisory
Forums Committee Committee
,��r au rt J
61 or �
r
# .a oCI
i
i
1 ®' 1�
low
NEW 'ROW
ry r t
� x
x
/ tl�
4
/x
y
v
u
x
�h
v
Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
Jeff Spartz, Chairman ,
Sam S. Sivanich, Vice Chairman
John E. Derus, Treasurer
Mark Andrew, Secretary
J
Randy Johnson
John Keefe J
E.F. Robb, Jr.
NOTE: The Comprehensive LRT System Plan for Hennepin County as presented in this report
was adopted by the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority on June 21, 1988.
J
J
I
c
COMPREHENSIVE LRT SYSTEM PLAN
FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY
Prepared for
HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY
2307 -A Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487
r
I Prepared by:
BRW, Inc.
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
Subcontractors:
BECHTEL CIVIL, INC.
LTK ENGINEERING SERVICES
MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL
r CNA CONSULTING ENGINEERS
June 21, 1988
i
G
I. SUMMARY
The Comprehensive Light Rail Transit System Plan has been prepared by the Hennepin County
Regional Railroad Authority ( HCRRA) in response to a mandate by the Minnesota State Legis-
lature in its 1987 session. In the preparation of the System Plan, the HCRRA considered:
• LRT Design and Service Standards and Policies
• System Definition
- Location of LRT Service within Hennepin County
- Patronage Forecast
- Capital and Operating Costs
• System Financing
G • Potential Public Benefits of LRT
• LRT and Corridor Land Use Relationship
• Implementation Methodology Alternatives
• System Operator
Major points are summarized below.
r
1
J
LRT DESIGN AND SERVICE STANDARDS AND POLICIES
J
The recommended system is a conventional light rails stem using a steel- wheeled vehicle riding
Y g system, g g
on a steel rail, electrical power drawn from an overhead wire, and exclusive (though not neces-
sarily grade- separated) right -of -way.
The analysis of system standards also determined hours of service, maximum headways, passenger '
loadin g standards fare collection method P regarding and other standards and policies re ardin system con -
struction and operation.
One remaining issue which has been deferred to the preliminary engineering phase of project
development is the means by which elderly and handicapped accessibility will be provided. The
options include high platform stations, low platform stations with various means of bringing the
mobility- impaired to the car floor height, and low floor cars which would allow level loading from
a 14- to 18 -inch high platform.
SYSTEM DEFINITION J
The recommended Twenty -Year Plan and the Stage I Plan are shown on Figure 1 and Figure 2.
The Twenty -Year Plan represents the long -range view of how light rail will serve Hennepin Coun-
ty and reflects the expected growth in population and employment concentrations. The
Twenty -Year Plan includes service in five corridors and a downtown segment located under-
ground; service in a sixth corridor is recommended for study with Anoka County. The Stage I Plan
is proposed to be implemented over an eight -year period. The Stage I Plan includes the Univer-
sity Connector and initial segments of the four other corridors contained in the Twenty -Year Plan.
The proposed Yards and Shop facility will be located in the Hiawatha Corridor near I -94 and
Cedar Avenue. The potential for trails will be investigated in preliminary engineering for all LRT
corridors.
J
2 .J
>,
E
i
z
s
3
V
- s
w
Stud E �,= �orritlor� with
a Stu Mar�heas#
Anbka CQOnty ;
T
`- Northwest 3 }} ,
I L
t
ry y
plreserve ?Y .� �t A$ _.• _� ([` l s' � .3:_ ., - i t�
-, g moutharrdor A.t3W
", �: v, - �annection with
Midway Crrtdor it
it
^
r11Yt'Sity
r
r
f
� Hiawatha �
uth
t , �
y... ;
sQ� � y
tlon to �
�/� 'A,
a w �-
t
v >
- ° Utenstans ;
E
r Future �tu<
Extension a '
p+ l
.H
r
E
IL
> e E
xte
nsta4�-
i-
f 7(E
h HCRRA FIGURE 1
Jlnirp�iri Gwrify Reyain�(Npil�'aad Au(honry
Comprehensive 20 Year Comprehensive
LRT System Plan o 2 Mile North LRT System Plan
J
'\N x
,� �.
��
S
t
w
,�, °.( € i F 3. 4 E .; ud �• # "' j' `".% ? sT , r
- .,?°":y , '' „• zr ...y r�r
,a.-
t,y f• s n v ° ;° ,3
by <-,
€, K D I-1 a, � F _ ..1
Y `1
-" Y.. F { i r r
A ••ti�3..t:Yv Ffikh^>.�:.
.rs R,' k °«,...._.. ...,...,.�... c ��:k r.: €. k r r 1 '4�, ¢S,Y:
4 � d p {t ,-'•A 1 �Pr•}3'A'Ctl,�.
.r° :. �
sas , ty . r 1F. y t€
#;; ,} > tt{ : =.a ak, •`"°" t L y r. 1' -' a,t 4 r .. r .;#g,,, .s ;�'-- L>.
« G ,.{ 9, ,;�.< at.. 4.�.. L �
— s.r`
is ! _... fy •, �S ,.. ..,,' ,a } ° 3 ). :�^,., k- !�S } 3 3;uSS ?n >} �3 /,a -t �:Y io-o-a � c ' 'L mu ,e�i- � t �� ,.:il:, �,.8• f
x.r d v,, - y ,r r ' ?t. { > �.Z ?. mg , -�• nvr�3� 7� ,». -- �"r`"K , ,.� \ .M ' a, ,< �� <� s17 €�,}
w 9
,
I 77tt , i —7 "'a ;...a� :� F f �✓:^`,".._ Fm'=- � �
.<..�j
�<. ...,_..> u • r.�xa «.. a£ G j ..: 1 : . - .fig R, F 3. ¢r . l ,' r >. > I's� 4 t
S �'..i: £ 6 .k 2 , 3: E;iN F .I..i.:.<,.g.,;Q . -de , T h } y, ,. >:„A
?. ...€ `f,� {a ... ,k
1 1'
it
,. 6 f �.:: :'s- ;� f »� � :. :, >. S:: tY�� � ��" h, •'.'1 �y a f ,.., ✓, ....
jr �. ,w°'^" q. y {,. „ £ E t � NC 3 3 � ,(t. •' 4 } � � d��..z, �i ..-�i� ,l' � �.s'/
4 1 � y �� '} <,. , �," !z �'".�S- �''t. � t.. 'i� �,��,.: S _ a• �` �il� '�. "z��"� ,�.;,.^;...� R: rax�,t.e r.
4 ��
,. e:tw ^L
t,..i ✓,x,g�a .f<` �*rr :•"xY .,»...,; ! '..>'. e ,a,. k
j
q 1 '�� s i •. € .ts:r z
f
� """:� r�+ :., ,,<;:..w �r��y }. ';r r ':... <, `i ,� � �' � k °�i< �i . i� 1 � � € �-�-
,r- s. a ..ab ,u� e ,�', a .�, , -,�:�, u,' - �,, -c»-^ { f " .t...^ -, ,{.:,.._< ..�.....a.
s s � ; w �
§ m' �f �4a a v a a
, o
�.�t$�a �.a.�`:'� €<
! , c `•, t i" ..C ,w_`°„ ... »..- _� ,. t >•.,., •:r / _ ` r , �.n� a. i E d<E- -: .... �a..:.`.,a• =-- 'Ce :.�C
a
r' e
a
. , r _, .. -� .. !a:',».n.. • .,, � .�, a raM r y^F„$ € s '�;. -�. ��fL.�rii� Cv� �_.y:;p::. .�,,.�, Vst � �: }�,
. a" <
t .., - i ,z ; I ,1 { Y l.: v,.� ia'E' €.`•€.. 7 .. �... - '--.a =,..a�,'1 . i<'',, \ �p 1.a o- a;,t. 'f
..,'' ,;?„x 4_ E #" i , "» ^ a ,.;.��i #:. k s -.�' ,,,�m<:: }-a 'it •€+. J
i f ,,
,
..r. ", - a ..,...y'1� t .: 1. �, i > s e ( �.;€..�. l i.m.. 1i•` y .'' ..e'�. ;:a x �� ,X \ ;� ?
� "`."T" {�.
w.
jj
r J ' 3 � „d :;: i•. € Y "Y f'i T � i S . i . i . I.
"y
=J ii ,',.�z S� 7 €} € ^.. �. � r _{ ,,.,,,, /J �,�.. _ , o-i € t �� � r11.
Ek _.. i:,., � 3 .. �.:. �, { w .l" �i •:..:....E +.s p $ ¢ '/ ,.�. � f „'�:
.¢, 1'" t ,€ ar
.,.,..<.j � /��F#F�� T ,1I}
-k {{ € I, x, ,�.,•. [
y � i
k.. f Ei F 3 y`dF ...�.". -+�, F
\
� k � V 1 � y . � L € t } � ....,.."°e�,
�...,� � s» P' 'ti�� �`= �u� -'Lw• c f.S;, ,_, t_ n E t' '"�t;,4:.s� �< a�� " �s
. -7 >N• s; "°Y>•�a• <t (r of t z.t t>, °' ,., /'`." € - l z �t�a Nmg fEe:aESx s^ - �. �
P V Ad j
�. ,.,,..k. ....,. 4 "`•w f� _ ., „....{ <S ,� Legend
At Grade
Tunnel
a € 1111M am am —K
HCRRA FIGURE 2
J
L RT Sys em Plan � lt'C1e' Stage I Plan
2 M;,BB North
F 0 0 0
F The characteristics of the Twenty -Year Plan and the Stage I Plan are presented on Table 1. The
characteristics include corridor length, capital cost, and ridership.
G
SYSTEM FINANCING
The above described Stage I Plan is estimated to cost $497 million (1988 dollars). The revenue
used to retire the bonds to pay for this system are expected to come from federal, state, local, and
private sources. At this time the following three revenue sources have been adopted by the
I HCRRA:
r-
• Property Tax levy of up to 1 mill for Hennepin County
• Tax increment financing through agreements between the HCRRA and cities
F • Motor vehicle excise tax (MVET) as directed by the Legislature
i
Other revenue sources that are candidates to be used to retire the bonds include:
• Hiawatha Special Funding
6 • I -35W Reconstruction Funds
• Urban Mass Transportation Administration Capital Grant
' • Private Sector Development Related Payments
P Y
• Other private- sector contributions
The first three revenue sources identified above would cover approximately 64 percent of the re-
F wired revenue to a for the 29 -mile Sta e I s stem. Durin relimina engineering, q pay g Y g preliminary the financial
plan and Stage I system plan will be finalized.
I
5
i
J
TABLE 1
J
CHARACTERISTICS OF RECOMMENDED
TWENTY -YEAR AND STAGE I PLANS
TWENTY -YEAR PLAN STAGE I PLAN
Length Capital Cost Daily Ridership Length Capital Cost Daily Ridership
SEGMENT (Miles) (1988 $ Million) Range Year 2010 (Miles) (1988 $ Million) Range Year 2010
Downtown 3.4 $138 -- 3.4 $138 --
(Tunnel to 29th Street)
Northwest Corridor 12.0 139 19,600 - 25,500 9.0 114 18,000 - 23,500
J
Southwest Corridor 13.5 127 16,600 - 22,000 6.9 71 14,500 - 18,800
South Corridor 10.4 216 24,500 - 32,000 4.4
80 15,300 - 20,000
Hiawatha Corridor 10.0 145 17,300 - 22,500 3.9 34 13,000 - 17,000 J
University Connector 1.5 40 9,200 - 12,000 1.5 40 9,200 - 12,000 J
Yards and Shops -- 20 __ 20
r
TOTAL 50.8 $825 87 200 -114 29.1 $497 70 - 91300
I
NOTE: The capital costs and patronage forecasts wilf be refined in Preliminary Engineering. The ridership forecasts are based on work reported in the
Metropolitan Council report dated December 1986, "A Study of Potential Transit Capital Investments in Twin Cities Corridors" and the results
of the Patronage Forecasting Peer Review Committee work.
J
J
BENEFITS OF LRT
Implementation of a light rail transit system in Hennepin County will have beneficial effects in
several areas:
• Enhanced transit service in corridors where LRT is constructed
• Increased transit patronage
(� • More economical use of transit resources
• Reduced auto trips on regional hi hw
p highway system
• Improved air quality in the region
• Reduced bus traffic in downtown Minneapolis
r
{ • Reduced auto traffic in downtown Minneapolis
• Reduced need for parking in downtown Minneapolis
• Increased development potential near stations
• Increased development potential in downtown Minneapolis
LRT AND CORRIDOR LAND USE RELATIONSHIP
Each community along proposed LRT alignments will be responsible for making appropriate
changes in its comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. The recommendation is that land use
decisions along the LRT alignments should remain the sole responsibility of local units of govern-
ment. The HCRRA will request the opportunity to review proposals for development along the
LRT alignments. Local communities will be asked to examine the potential for funding of develop-
7
ment - related LRT construction under an agreement with the HCRRA through the appropriate
g g
local taxing authority.
IMPLEMENTATION METHODOLOGY ALTERNATIVES
Four alternative implementation methodologies were defined and analyzed; the preferred ap-
proach will be selected in preliminary engineering. i
Traditional
The Project Manager/Engineer prepares detailed plans and specifications for all system com-
ponents. Contracts are bid and awarded to low, responsible bidders.
Upon completion, an operations contractor or a public agency operates the system. Traditional
contracting provides maximum control to the project owner, but limits the likelihood of obtain-
ing contractor financial participation.
J
Design/Build
The Project Manager/Engineer advances the design to approximately the thirty percent level.
J g PP Y tY P
Contracts are awarded to contractors who design, furnish, and install each component. Upon com-
pletion, an operations contractor or a public agency operates the system; the operations decision r
is made independent of the design and construction. Design/Build sacrifices a modest degree of
owner control, but enables suppliers to tailor final design to their products rather than having to '
"re- engineer" to the owner's exact specifications.
J
ti
Turnkey
The Project Manager/Engineer advances the design as would be done in the Design/Build
category, but the performance specifications and thirty percent design are issued for competition
as one package. The winning Turnkey contractbr completes the design in all areas and fabricates
and furnishes the equipment at an agreed -upon price. The Turnkey Contractor also manages the
operation of the system, at an agreed -upon price, for a prescribed period to ensure reliability. A
minimum period of five years is usually suggested as a reasonable time period for problems to
r develop.
Super Turnkey
{ This is the same as the Turnkey approach except that, in addition, the Super Turnkey contractor
is made responsible for partial or total system financing and may be involved in the related land
development. This approach allows the private sector to prepare "innovative" financing methods.
The Super Turnkey approach is likely to require that public agencies cede substantial control over
the precise details of the technical /physical solution to the Super Turnkey contractor.
SYSTEM OPERATOR
G
It is recommended that the LRT system be operated by the Metropolitan Transit Commission.
The potential for private sector management of the system would exist.
I_
I
i 9
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Council meetin Date 7/25/88
Agenda Item Numbe
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH THE CAPTAIN'S SELECTION PROCESS
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL:
Signature - title
MANAGER'S REVIEW /RECOMMENDATION:
No comments to supplement this report Comments below /attached X
*********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
SUMMARY EXPLANATION: (supplemental sheets attached X
HISTORY:
September, 1987 City Council approved contingency funds for police captain position in 1988. May,
1988, City Council transferred funds from contingency to police department budget for captain's
position and placed a hold on final stages of selection process.
We respectfully request the City Council remove the hold on the selection process for the police
captain's position authorized in the 1988 budget. Attached is a report on the status of certain
problem areas pointed out to the Council in the 1988 budget presentations. We are proposing to
complete the internal selection process and fill the position by October 1, 1988.
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to authorize city staff to proceed with the captain's position selection process.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
SUBJECT: Police Department Operational Status
DATE: July 19, 1988
As a part of the 1988 budget process, we identified. certain
problem areas within the department. As a part of the budget
process, we sought to address a number of these problem areas: `
1. Report typing
2. Investigation clerical support - property room
3. Initial Complaint Reports (ICR's) and data entry
4. Investigation workload
5. Administrative workload
The following is a status report on these problem areas after
reviewing and analyzing the first six months of 1988:
1. Report typing
-With the approval in the 1988 budget of an
additional 1,000 hours per year of report
typing, we have, since early in 1988,
eliminated the excessive backlog of untyped
reports and are now keeping current. Unless
highly unusual circumstances occur, all
weekend low priority reports are consistently
typed by noon Tuesday. High priority reports
are typed by noon on Monday.
2. Investigation clerical support - property room
-With the addition of a full -time secretary
for investigation and assigning of property
room responsibilities to this position, the
investigators' "phone call" handling problems
have been substantially reduced. The
revamping of the property room is now
complete and this function is being
transferred to the investigation secretary.
The receptionist activity and clerical
support given to the investigators by this
position has allowed them to better utilize
their time and serve the public more
effectively.
3. ICR and data entry
-The 1988 budget approved additional
personnel hours for this function. This has
. resulted in the elimination of the data entry
backlog. Since early in 1988 we have
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL -2- July 20, 1988
consistently kept up with data entry
schedules and eliminated any backlogs.
The department has implemented administrative and clerical
procedures which will effectively review and cross check the
meeting of data entry, equipment repair, and report typing
schedules. Cross training of clerical and technical personnel
now provides at least two people trained for each function. To
keep current in their "secondary" assignments, backup personnel
are routinely scheduled to perform their "secondary" backup
functions. The administrative services manager monitors daily
`
g Y
the report typing status and weekly data entry and property room
status. The police administrative assistant monthly reviews the
status of report typing, equipment repair, data entry and
property room functions, as well as other departmental
statistics.
4. Investigation workload
-The additional full -time officer assigned to
this area in late May of 1988 has helped in
reducing the case backlog. Because the new
assignee is still "in training," it's not
possible to evaluate the full impact of this
addition until early 1989. This division now
has an updated case tracking system.
5. Administrative workload
-The Council has approved an additional
captain's position in the 1988 budget
effective September 1, 1988, and placed a
hold on the selection process pending this
report to the City Council. I believe the
addition of this position will enhance the
department's service capabilities in the
following areas:
1. Allow the department to meet the
increasing administrative workload
and have more time to:
-work with juvenile mediation and
domestic intervention programs.
- review citizen inquiries.
-work with crime prevention program
(business and residential).
- increase the effectiveness of our
training program.
- evaluate new program needs.
- evaluate and improve department
effectiveness.
-meet the increased administrative
demands of the court system.
- evaluate computer data to direct
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL -3- July 20, 1988
department activities.
2. Increased supervisory capability.
- Increased time is needed to assist
investigators and give them
additional support in working with
more complex cases and the county
attorney's office.
-There is also a need for
additional supervisory time in the
dispatch and patrol function. `
- Because this department functions
24 hours per day 365 days per year,
it requires more hours of
supervision than the standard 40
hours per week municipal function.
The additional captain's position
will allow us to extend
administrative management services
regularly to the "dog watch" hours.
Respectfully submitted,
Geral G. S linter
City Pl P anager
TO: JERRY SPLINTER CITY MANAGER
FROM: RON BOMAN FIRE CHIEF 0
SUBJECT; RELIEF ASSOCIATION QUESTIONS
DATE: JULY 12, 1988
I have listed below the contributions other cities make to there
relief associations, in order to get a more complete picture I
have also included the amount other cities pay for fire run pay
and Brooklyn Centers duty or sleep in pay. Brooklyn Center is `
the only city in our mutual aid association that doesn't receive
run pay, or pay for drills and work details.
CITY PENSION RUN & DRILL TOTAL CITY
CONTRIBUTION PAY CONTRIBUTION
NEW HOPE $14,500 $112,500 $127,000
CRYSTAL 840,484 $65,000 $105,484
PLYMOUTH $15,000 $106,000 $121,000
BROOKLYN PARK $12 $98,000 $110,000
FRIDLEY FULLY FUNDED $86,000 $86,000
IN 1987
BROOKLYN CTR. 26 743 72 94
$ $46,200 $ 3 , 4
PENSION BENIFITS PAID
NEW HOPE $300 PER MONTH AFTER 20 YEARS
$450 PER MONTH AFTER 30 YEARS
OPTION TO TAKE LUMP SUM @ $2,350 PER YEAR OF
SERVICE
CRYSTAL $300 PER MONTH AFTER 20 YEARS
$450 PER MONTH AFTER 30 YEARS
OPTION TO TAKE A LUMP SUM @ $2,400 PER YEAR OF
SERVICE
PLYMOUTH $480 PER MONTH AFTER 20 YEARS
$720 PER MONTH AFTER 30 YEARS
OPTION TO TAKE A LUMP SUM @ $2,400 PER YEAR OF
SERVICE
BROOKLYN PARK DEFINED CONTRIBUTION TO EACH INDIVIDUALS PERSONAL
ACCOUNT, AUTOMATICALLY INCREASED EACH YEAR BY THE
SAME AMOUNT OF PAY INCREASE GIVEN TO NON UNION
CITY EMPLOYEE'S
FRIDLEY DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION PLAN
The median age of the Brooklyn Center Fire Department is 37
years, with youngest member at age 20 and the oldest at age 55.
We have 21 members that will have 25 years in before they reach
the age of 48, or seven (7) years before they would have to
retire under the present system of retirement at age 55. One of
the main reasons for allowing firefighters to continue to
accumulate pension up to 30 ,years is that we are having more
persons joining the fire department at a younger age.
All members of the Brooklyn Center Fire Department are required `
to maintain 25% of all calls the fire department receives and 33%
of his expected or assigned fire calls, during the last two years
we have responded to over 500 fire calls each year. All
firefighters are broken into two categories, day and weekend or
night and weekend firefighters. In addition all members must
attend drills, meetings and work details, we have drills and
meetings scheduled every Monday night, every member must make 50%
of the work details scheduled for the year, and cannot miss more
that two (2) drills in a row. Failure to make your assigned
calls, drills and work details subjects a member to disciplinary
action, usually a 30 day suspendation from the Fire Department,
two (2) suspendations in a 12 month period will result in
termination from the Fire Department. The exceptions are for
vacations and sickness.
All of our firefighters are evaluated on on the above criterion
on a quarterly basis.
All members of the Brooklyn Center Fire Department must be able
to function in any area of fire suppression, at any given time
their job can vary such as nozzelman, pumper operator,
ventilation or salvage and overhall, or they have to know how to
use or emergency equipment such as the Hurst tool and airlift
bags ect. After responding to a fire or emergency all equipment
must be cleaned and put back on the engines, so we are ready to
respond to the next call. It generally takes as much time to put,
the equipment back in operating condition as is spent on the fire
of emergency, if we spend 2 hours at the fire it will take us
another 2 hours cleaning airmasks, relaying and washing hose and
putting the engines back in shape.
During the past year the average member of the Brooklyn Center
Fire Department responded to 259 fire emergencies, 3 drills and
meetings and 4 work details, for average of 420 hours devoted a
year to the fire department or an average of 35 hours per month.
This figure doesn't include extra duties some members take on
such as the dive rescue team, the rope rescue team, working
during fire prevention week and attending schools outside our
fire department. Our work details include cleaning, waxing of
all fire department equipment, washing and rolling fire hose,
cleaning the apparatus room area and doing minor repairs on the
fire engines and mounting equipment ect.
Licenses to be approved by the City Council on July 25, 1988:
GARBAGE AND REFUSE COLLECTION VEHICLE
Gallagher's Service, Inc. 1691 91st Ave. NE
Metro Refuse 8168 W. 125th Street
Willman Trucking, Inc. 62 - 26th Ave. N. �( %�1✓V/_�
Sanitarian _ _
ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT ( 7 !
Brooklyn Center Park & Recreation Central Park
Sanitarian
r
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS ,. <
Del -Air Heating & Cooling 9860 James Circle
Building Official
RENTAL DWELLINGS
Initial:
Stephen & Karen Cook 5306 Russell Ave. N.
Janet M. Schenk 3118 67th Ave. N.
Renewal:
Lloyd J. Waldusky Georgetown Park Townhouses
Olympic Electric Lyn River Apartments
Douglas Bistodeau 5541 Emerson Ave. N.
Jay Showalter 6742, 44 France Ave. N.
Roland Scherber 7212 Newton Ave. N.
Richard T. Stallman 1215 54th Ave. N.
Douglas & JoMarie Hentges 5206 63rd Ave. N. i { /jj1
Harshad Bhatt 7206, 12 West River Road ` I (.0 l( lY ?' .
Director of PlanningE,
and Inspection
r
GENERAL APPROVAL:
D. K. Weeks, City Clerk