Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978 05-08 CCM Regular Session MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION MAY 8, 1978 CITY HALL Call to Order The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called.to order by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7 :00 p.m. Roll Call Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka and Celia Scott. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Works James Merila, City Attorney Richard Schieffer, Director of Finance Paul Holmlund, Deputy Chief of Police James Lindsay, Director of Planning and Inspection Blair Tremere, and Administrative Assistants Ronald Warren, Brad Hoffman, and Mary Harty Invocation Councilmember Scott offered an invocation. Approval of Minutes Motion by Councilmember Fignar and seconded by Council- 4-24-78 member Scott to approve the minutes of the April 24, 1978 City Council meeting as submitted. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unani- mously Open Forum Mayor bean Nyquist introduced the first item of business on the agenda, that of the Open Forum. He explained that the Open Forum was instituted to give any citizen the opportunity to address the City Council as a whole and comment on any opinion, problem, concern, or complaint they might have which is relevant to the affairs of this local government and its policies and practices. He reported that he had received a letter from Mrs. George Nerburn, 1100 Emerson Lane, and a request that it be read because she would be unable to attend this evening's Council meeting. Mayor Nyquist read the letter thanking the City Council for their letter of concern regarding the sale of pot paraphernalia which had been sent to local businesses. Mayor Nyquist then recognized Mrs. Harold Olsen, 6123 Bryant Avenue North, who stated that she was shocked to find out about the recent increase in the per gallon charge for water and also the increased sewer charge. She claimed that the increase amounted to between 47 and 50 per cent and that this has an adverse effect on persons with limited incomes. She inquired as to why the City of Brooklyn Center had to raise its rates when the rates in the cities of Robbins- dale and Brooklyn Park are less Councilmember Kuefler responded that the current Robbins- dale sewage rate is higher than that of Brooklyn Center even with the new increase. The City Manager pointed out that the costs for treatment of sewage at the Pig's Eye facility have increased and .that this cost in turn has been passed along to the City. He noted that this has had the effect of requiring a higher sanitary sewer rate. The Director of Public Works stated that presently sanitary sewer users pay 55� per 1, 000 gallons of sewage and that approximately 50� per 1,000 gallons must be paid by the City of Brooklyn Center to the Sewage Board He explained that it had originally been recommended that the sanitary sewer rate be -1- 5 -8 -78 increased from $8.75 quarterly to $16.50 to offset the current deficit but after review and discussion by the City Council, and a public hearing, it was felt that it would be more beneficial to have a smaller, original increase which would he followed in succeeding years by increases. The City Manager pointed out that the sanitary 'sewer rate has been 'set at $8.75 per quarter since 1971 and that within the last year the City has experienced a deficit and, therefore, was faced with the fact that the sanitary sewer rates had to be increased. Mrs. Olsen stated there is a third .party who is Nandi - capped who lives in their home but that they cannot qualify for the reduced senior citizen rate. She added that she hoped something could be done by the City Council to address this problem, Mayor Nyquist next recognized Loretta Farrell, 5849 Camden Avenue North, who stated that she too wished to comment on the sewer and water rates but that her questions had been adequately addressed to with the previous explanation. Mayor Nyquist then recognized Nancy Griffin, 6437 Emerson Avenue North, who also commented relative to the sewer and water rates. She stated other suburbs do not seem to have been hit quite as hard as Brooklyn Center with respect to the new sanitary sewer rates. She inquired if businesses were charged in the same manner as residential property. The City Manager responded the same sewer and water rates on a per gallon basis are used to compute the bills for both commercial and residential property. In response to another inquiry by Mrs. Olsen,_ the Director of Public Works stated the present sanitary sewer rate charge is 55� per 1,000 gallons and the water rate charge is 35� per 1, 000 gallons. He added only the sanitary sewer rate had been raised and fiot the water rate. Councilmember Kuefler noted there had been some comments that seem to indicate that Brooklyn Center residents were paying a higher sanitary sewer rate than were citizens of other communities. He pointed out that even with the increased sanitary sewer rate Brooklyn Center residents were not paying higher sewer charges than many other suburban communities. He requested the Director of Public Works to distribute copies of a sanitary sewer rate survey that had been conducted in conjunction with the recommendation to raise the sanitary sewer rates. A brief discussion ensued relative to sanitary sewer and water rates with the City Manager further explaining the rationale for the increase in sanitary sewer rates. Cou_rcilmember Fignar commented the City does not have much control over the charges that are placed on the City by the Metropolitan Sewer Board and that these charges must be paid. He also commented that the City Council had discussed the possibility of providing a subsidy k for senior citizens with three per household but had decided that it could not be feasibly ly do e at this time, .v „5_8_78 -2- An unidentified citizen living at 625 59th Avenue North inquired as to why her water was discolored. The City Manager stated the problem might be solved by flushing the water mains but that it would be checked out further by the Public Utilities Division. He added that generally the discoloration that sometimes appears in City water is harmless. Mayor Nyquist inquired if anyone else wished to be recog- nized for the Open Forum. There being none, the Open Forum was closed. Brooklyn Center High Mayor Nyquist announced that the Brooklyn Center High School Award School Office Education Association Chapter was recently named Chapter of the Year in national competition in Detroit, Michigan. He stated that this is quite an achievement for the High School and that he thought it would be appropriate for the City Council to acknowledge Mr. Dick Lawrence and the Brooklyn Center High School Office Education Association Chapter. Action Directing the Following a brief discussion there was a motion by Council- Preparation of a member Fignar and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to Resolution direct the City Manager to preppre a resolution commending Mr. Dick Lawrence and his Broollyn Center High School Office Education Association Chapter on being named Chapter of the Year in national competition Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Final Plat Approval Motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Council (The Ponds Second member Kuefler to approve the final plat for The Ponds Addition) Second Addition comprehending property on Unity Avenue North between 69th Avenue and 73rd Avenue North Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Final Plat Approval Motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Council - (Gunderson Addition) member Fignar to approve the final plat for the Gunderson Addition involving a cul -de -sac extension of Aldrich Avenue northerly of 68th Avenue North. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously, Subdivision Bond Motion by Councilmember Fignar and seconded by Council- Release member Lhotka to authorize final release of the remaining $500 of a $68,000 financial performance guarantee posted> by Swanco, Inc. for the West River Estates Addition located between Camden and Bryant Avenues from 67th to 68th Avenues North. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, _Council- members Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Action Declaring Motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded by Council - Surplus Property member Scott to declare a 1964 Elgin Street King street sweeper, model No. UR345, serial No. H2312, surplus property to be disposed of in the best interests of the City. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. -3- 5 -8 -78 The City. Manager introduced the next item of business on Police Department "the. agenda, that of two resolutions offered in conjunction Restructuring ' with his restructuring of the police department. He explained that one resolution is recommended for the purpose of Modifying the present police department college education incentive program to exclude sworn personnel above the rank of patrol officer. He stated the elimination of the I� college incentive bonus for these personnel comprehends establishing a maximum salary for the positions which would be equivalent to current base salaries plus the maximum college incentive bonus but would also recognize training, education, performance or any combination thereof as a means to attain this maximum salary level. He reported the other resolution is recommended for the purpose of amending the 1978 salary schedule and 1978 General Fund Budget in conjunction with his restructuring of the police department. He reported the need for the restructuring is the result of the recent resignation of the police chief and the appointment of the deputy chief as his replacement effective May 21, 1978 and the announced retirement of the police department lieutenant on or before October 1 1978 The City Manager reported the restructuring calls for the elimination of the deputy chief position and the elimination of the lieutenant position, with the lieutenant's resignation, and the creation of the position of police department captain -and one additional sergeant. He noted the reorganization will not change the number of staff ,positions in the police department. He pointed out a detailed cost analysis of implementing the new structure has been completed and it has been determined the restructuring will cost less than ` the current appropriation. He explained that with the "addition of a new sergeant position, the possibility exists that the person assuming this position will spend considerable time outside of the office and an additional vehicle might be necessary. He pointed out that this need will be reviewed and that later this year he may be requesting authorization for an additional vehicle. He pointed out that if the vehicle is needed he felt it could be financed within the current appropriation. The City Manager concluded by stating that Deputy Chief Lindsay is present this evening to review the restructuring of the police department with the City Council. Mayer Nyquist recognized Deputy Chief Lindsay who reviewed a transparency showing the current police depart- ment organization chart and an organization chart depicting the restructuring of the police department. He stated with the resignation of the chief and the lieutenant, the police department would be left with an administrative complement of sworn personnel including himself and four sergeants`. He stated that this was an excellent time to look at the structure of the police department and to develop a restruc- turing that could make better use of current personnel. He reported the restructuring, as indicated by the City Manager, involves the adding of a captain's position and one additional sergeant. He further reported that basically there will be two sections of personnel- -sworn personnel and nonsworn personnel. He pointed out the restructuring comprehends the captain's position as being the person who is second in command to the chief and who is ultimately responsible for all sworn depart- ment personnel. He stated the captain would be responsible for providing direct supervision over all sergeants and the person will be responsible for developing a thorough under- standing of the complete operation of the police department. 5 -8 -78 -4- He added the restructuring also comprehends the addition of ` one sergeant which will bring the total complement of sergeants to five upon the resignation of the present police department lieutenant. He explained the additional sergeant position would be involved in providing direct supervision to plainclothes investigators. The deputy chief stated it is anticipated that promotions from within will be made for the position of captain and that candidates for this position will come from the present complement of sergeants. He pointed out that with the promotion of a person from sergeant to captain and the addition of one sergeant position, the police department will be looking for two additional sergeants and plans to promote two persons from the current ranks of patrol officers. He added that it is intended to use a consultant from Labor Relations Associates to help in the selection of both the captain position and the sergeant position, and that this can be provided under the current budget appropriation. The deputy chief reported that the ratio - of sworn administrative personnel to sworn personnel will remain the same with the restructuring and that presently 21.8% of sworn personnel are at or above the rank of sergeant in the police department. He noted that this is a relatively low -percentage in compar- ison to - many other suburban police departments. The deputy chief further reported the creation of a new ser- geant position to replace the lieutenant position will, in all likelihood, mean a need for an additional vehicle at least by 1979. He stated the duties of the new sergeant will require that person to spend considerably more time out of the office than does the present lieutenant. Councilmember Fignar inquired as to the duties and respon- sibilities of the clerk- supervisor. The deputy chief responded that the clerk - supervisor is directly responsible for supervising clerk dispatchers and part -time clerical help. He further stated that the clerk- supervisor also handles misdemeanor check cases, is responsible for the police department property room, typing and clarifying all police reports, and is also responsible for the`jail facilities, The City Manager added that basically the clerk- supervisor , is an office manager in the police department. In response to an inquiry by Councilmember Lhotka, the deputy chief stated that currently three investigator assignees report to the lieutenant and that the other two assignees report to him. He added that with the making of an investigative sergeant that person would be responsible for coordinating all of the activities of the assignees. Also in response to an inquiry by Councilmember Lhotka, the deputy chief stated that the other four sergeants will be responsible for the day -to -day operation of patrol officers on the street. He pointed out that the police department operates three eight -hour shifts, seven days a week and there is a need for at least five sergeants to adequately cover these shifts 365 days of the year. He noted that the investigative sergeant would really be a uniformed sergeant and could fill in when other sergeants are on vacation or away from duty for a variety of reasons. Councilmember Kuefler commented that the restructuring does not make drastic changes in that there will be the same number of administrative personnel in the police department. He stated that he views the restructuring as a shifting of positions .to better utilize the police department's manpower. The deputy chief commented that it is felt that better public service can be provided with this restructuring, Council - -5- 5 -8 -78 member Lhotka inquired if the police department was contem- plating increasing the number of patrol officers in the future. The City Manager responded that there was an additional patrol officer position created in the present police department budget, that the department is now in the process of recruiting for that position, and it will probably be filled in June or July of this year. He added that determining manpower requires an analysis of the demand for service prior to making such recommendations.. He added the department attempts to analyze the amount, the type and the location of calls for service and then match manpower recommendations accordingly. In response to another inquiry by Councilmember Lhotka, the deputy chief stated that a normal work schedule calls for four officers on duty during the day watch, five officers on duty ,during the mid watch, and five officers on duty during the dog watch. He noted that in addition to this schedule, one patrol officer works a shift from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and another from 7 :00 p.m. to 3 :00 a.m. He pointed out that there are five investigator assignees, three on during the days and two on during the evenings. A brief discussion ensued relative to the resolution recom- mended for the purpose of modifying the police department education incentive program, The City Manager pointed out that this resolution only affects officers at or above the rank of sergeant and has no'- whatsoever on college incentive for person in the department covered under the collective bargaining agreement. Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION and moved its adoption: NO. 78 -80 RESOLUTION CONTINUING AND MODIFYING A POLICE DEPARTMENT COLLEGE EDUCATION INCENTIVE PROGRAM AND PRESCRIBING A POLICY RELATED THERETO The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said .resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION and moved its adoption: NO. 78 -81 RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE 1978 CITY SCHEDULE OF POSITIONS AND MAXIMUM SALARIES AND TO AMEND THE 1978 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THOSE CHANGES The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott-, and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. The City Manager introduced the next item of business on Planning Commission the agenda, that of Planning Commission Application Application No. 78022 No. 78022 submitted by Konstantin Topoluk. ( Konstantin Topoluk) 5 =.8 -78 -6- The Director of Planning and Inspection proceeded with a review of Planning Commission Application No. 78022 and the Planning Commission action at its April 27, 1978 meeting. He stated that the application was for approval of a pre - liminary plat of the area located at the southeast corner of 73rd and Dupont Avenues North, and includes a request for a variance on lot size. He stated that the area was zoned R -1 and that the minimum lot size in that zoning district was 75 feet for an interior lot and 90 feet for a corner lot. He explained that the property was approximately 294 feet wide and approximately 130 feet deep. He stated that the applicant had submitted two preliminary plats, one which would divide the property into three lots which exceed ordinance standards as to width and area, and the other one which would divide the property into four lots, none of which meet ordinance standards. He next reviewed a transparency showing the location and configuration of the property in question and showed how the two different proposals would affect the subdivision. The Director of Planning and Inspection reported that the applicant had proposed a subdivision which would result in three 70 foot interior lots and an 84 foot corner lot. He explained that Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances states that the Council may authorize a variance from the ordinance standards when, in its opinion, undue hardship may result from strict compliance. He reported that the Planning Commission had recommended denial of the variance under this application and had cited the following reasons: 1. The variance request does not meet the ordinance standards for variance from the subdivision regu- lations 2. There is no precedent for a variance on lot width in this vicinity. 3. Approval would establish an undesirable. precedent for remaining unplatted land. A brief discussion ensued relative to the application. In response to an inquiry by Councilmember Fignar, the Director of Planning and Inspection stated that the area of the interior lots proposed by the applicant would amount to three interior lots with 9,100 square feet each and one corner lot with 10,930 square feet. He pointed out that the ordinance calls for a 9,500 square foot minimum interior lot and a 10,500 square foot minimum corner lot area. The Director of Planning and Inspection reported that the Planning Commission' had recommended approval of the subdivision with a 100 foot corner lot and two 97 foot interior lots, Councilmember Fignar inquired if it would be possible for this property, if it was zoned R-2, to hold duplexes. The Director of Planning and Inspection responded that if the zoning ordinance permitted R -2 development in this area, it might be possible to build duplexes. He pointed out that a rezoning from R -1 to R -2 would require that such a change be warranted. He stated that the only R -2 areas in the City are in the southeast and parts of the southwest sections. He noted that the Comprehensive Plan called for R -2 develop- ment in the southeast area in hopes that substandard lots would be combined into parcels large enough to comprehend the construction of duplexes and to also provide alternative types of housing in the City. He concluded by stating that a rezoning was not considered by the Planning Commission -7- 5 --8 -78 and that there would be a number of things that would first have to be addressed prior to the Commission making such a recommendation. Also in response to an inquiry by Council -- e member Fignar, the Director of Planning and Inspection stated that none of the single family interior lots in this C area are under 75 feet. Councilmember Scott stated that her concerns with approval of a four lot plat are that an undesirable precedent would be set in this area and that the City in the future would find themselves hard pressed not to grant similar variances if they were brought to the Council. She stated that she does not favor the four lot `plat. Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for purposes of a public Public Hearing hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 78022. No one spoke relating to the application. Motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Council Action Closing member Lhotka to close the public hearing on Planning Public Hearing Commission Application No. 78022. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. In response to an inquiry by Councilmember Kuefler the Director of Planning and Inspection reviewed the standards for permitting a subdivision variance. He stated that to grant a variance the Council would have to find that there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property such that the strict application of the provision of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of h n the reasonable P AP use of his land; that the variance is necessary for the preser- vation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner; and that the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which the property is situated, Following further discussion there was a motion by Council- Action Denying Variance member Fignar and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to Under Planning Commission deny the variance request under Planning Commission Application No. 78022 Application No. 78022 submitted by Konstantin Topoluk for (Konstantin Topolu::) the following reasons; 1 . The variance request does not meet the ordinance standards for variance from the subdivision regu- lations. 2. There is no precedent for a variance on lot width in this vicinity. 3. Approval would establish an undesirable precedent for remaining platted land. Voting - in'favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler,` Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Following further discussion there was a motion by Council Action Approving Preliminary member Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to Plat Meeting Ordinance approve the plat submitted by Mr. Konstantin Topoluk which Requirements Under Planning meets the ordinance standards as to dimensions subject to Commission Application the following conditions: No 78022 (Konstantin Topoluk) 1. Final plat is subject to approval by the City Engineer. 2. Final plat is subject to requirements of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances, 5 --8 -78 -8 Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Planning Commission The City Manager introduced the next item of business on Application No. 78020 the agenda, that of Planning Commission Application No. (Independence Ten) 78020 submitted by Independence Ten. The Director of Planning and Inspection proceeded with a review of Planning Commission Application No. 78020 and the Planning Commission action at its April 27, 1978 meeting. He stated that the applicant sought approval of site and building plans for the property located at 7240 Brooklyn Boulevard which included a variance to allow the building to be built at the property line. He next reviewed a trans - parency showing the location and configuration of the property in question and stated that the property contained a 12 foot wide parcel of land located in the City of Brooklyn Park which is owned by the applicant. He further stated that the appli- cant proposed to build the building at the "zero lot line" setback on the north side rather than have the required 10 foot minimum building setback, and would encumber the parcel in Brooklyn Park as a permanent greenstrip. He explained that the request was essentially a recognition of the uniqueness of the situation where the property is split by a municipal boundary, thereby requiring the 12 feet in Brooklyn Park to be a separate parcel. He added that this has been reviewed by the City of Brooklyn Park and they do not object to it. A brief discussion ensued relative to the application with Councilmember Kuefler commenting that the variance, in essence, relates only to the property in Brooklyn Center and if the additional 12 feet lying in Brooklyn Park were all within the municipal boundary, there would not be a need for the variance and the side yard setbacks could be met. In response to an inquiry by Councilmember Kuefler, the Director of Planning and Inspection confirmed that the 12 feet contained in the City of Brooklyn Park would be encumbered and become part of the property. The Director of Planning and Inspection next reviewed the site and building plans and further discussion ensued, Mayor Nyquist recognized Mr. William Peterson, an architect representing the applicant, who showed a drawing of the building and commented on its use and access. He stated that they are attempting to save as many trees as possible on the site and to provide adequate screening with existing trees and the relocation of some evergreen trees. Public Hearing Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for purposes of a public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 78020. No one spoke relating to the application. Close Public Motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Council- Hearing member Fignar to close the public hearing on Planning Com- mission Application No. 78020 Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unani- mously. Action Approving Following further discussion there was a motion by Council- Planning Commission member Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to Application No. 78020 approve Planning Commission Application No. 78020 (Independence Ten) submitted by Independence Ten subject to the following conditions: I -9- 5 -8 -78 1 , Building Plans are subject to review by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage, berming and utility plans are subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits 3. A performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted to assure com- pletion of approved site improvements. 4. An appropriate legal encumbrance approved by the City as to form and content shall be filed against the adjacent property in Brooklyn Park, which is owned by the applicant, establishing the use of said parcel as required open space to be maintained with landscaping as a side yard of the proposed office building. Evidence that this covenant has been appropriate) filed with Hennepin County Y p ou ty shall be submitted with the application for permits 5. All outside trash disposal and any rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 6. The building shall be equipped with automatic fire extinqushing system to meet or exceed NFP13 Standard No. 13. 7. Approval includes recognition of a variance to locate the building at the property line; this io based upon the finding that ordinance variance standards are met, especially with respect to uniqueness and hardship, 86 Approval is exclusive of all signery which shall be subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 9. Willow cuttings shall be distributed across the berm to provide additional screening of the parkins, area. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. The City Manager introduced the next item of business Planning Commission on the agenda, that of Planning Commission Application Application No. 78027 - No. 78027 submitted by Michlitsch Builders. - (Michlitsch Builders) The Director of Planning and Inspection proceeded with a review of Planning Commission Application No. 78027 and the Planning Commission action at its April 27, 1978 meeting. He stated that the applicant was seeking approval of a master plan for the property located at 6637 Humboldt Avenue North and approval of site and building plans for the first phase of that master plan. He reviewed a trans- parency showing the location and configuration of the property in question and explained that the property was one of three vacant R-5 (multi - residential) parcels in the 6600 - 6800 block of Humboldt Avenue. He pointed out that the Berean Evangelical Church directly to the south of the site and noted that this was the only R -1 (single family) zoned property in the immediate area. He stated that the applicant intended to develop the property with an R -4 (1 -1/2 to 2 story) rather than an R -5 (2 -1/2 to 3 5 -8 -78 -10- story) use. He explained that this was permissible pro- vided the R -4 ordinance standards were met. He added that the applicant proposed a master plan containing two fourplexes and one fiveplex for the property and that one fourplex would be built in the first phase of the development. The Director of Planning and Inspection explained that the ordinance requires that, whenever R -4 or R -5 land directly abuts R -1 land, there shall be provided a 15 foot green- strip containing an opaque fence or wall or Council approved substitute, and that the R -1 property to the south is developed with an institutional R -1 use. He stated that the applicant proposes a berm with plantings rather than a fence or wall on the site. He added that the ordinance also requires that all open parking of 6 or more spaces be screened from neighboring residential property, and pointed out that the church parsonage was the only single family house in the area and was adjacent to the R -5 property. The Director of Planning and Inspection next reviewed the site and building plans and a brief discussion ensued relative to the application Mayor Nyquist recognized the applicant, Mr. Marvin Michlitsch, who stated that he had nothing further to add to the application. Action Approving Following further discussion there was a motion by Council - Planning Commission member Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to Application No. 78027 approve Planning Commission Application No. 78027 (Michlitsch Builders) submitted by Michlitsch Builders subject to the following conditions 1. The building plans are subject to review and o approval by the Building Official prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Site grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted to assure com- pletion of approved site improvements. 4. The property shall be replatted by formal plat or registered land survey prior to occupancy of the proposed building. 5. All outside trash disposal facilities shall be appropriately screened from view, 6. Site plan shall be modified to show a 3 foot berm along he south property line. g P p Y 7. Site plans shall be revised to provide an adequate backout space and to show a parking lot delineator which meets ordinance standards. 8. Installation of concrete curb and gutter along the north edge of the phase I parking lot may be deferred for a, period of not more than two years, provided: a.. Temporary curbing approved by the City is installed and maintained during the deferral period; . -11- 5 -8 -7$ b. Permanent curbing may be required during the period upon determination by the City that the temporary curbing is not adequate in design or maintenance; c. The permanent curbing requirement will be waived upon approval of subsequent site plans wherein curbing is not necessary. The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 8:52 p.m. Recess and resumed at 9:06 p.m, The City Manager introduced the next item of business Planning Commission on the agenda, that of Planning Commission Application Application No. 78019 No. 78019 submitted by BCIP, Inc, (BCIP) The Director of Planning and Inspection proceeded with a review eview of Planning Commission ion Application No. 78.019 and the Planning Commission o action g tion at its April 2 7 7 p 19 8 meeting. He stated that the applicant sought approval of a preliminary registered land survey for the property located at 6100 Summit Drive. He reviewed a transparency of the area and explained that this item was a condition of approval of Application No. 78002 for a special use permit for the Summit State, Bank, which was approved by the City Council on February 27, 1978. He reported that the proposed registered land survey constituted a resubdivision of an existing registered land survey. He pointed out that the resubdivision would assure that all buildings and facilities related e to the bank operation w a u ld b e o n c tamed within a single parcel, Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for purposes of a public Public Hearing hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 78019. No one spoke relating to the application. Motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Council- Close Public member Lhotka to close the public hearing. Voting in Hearing favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed. Councilmember Kuefler and Councilmember Fignar were away from the table at the time of the vote. Following a brief discussion there was a motion by Council- Action Approving member Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to Planning Commission approve Planning Commission Application No. 78019 Application No, 78019 submitted by BCIP, Inc., subject to the following conditions: (BCIP Inc.) 1. The final RLS is subject to approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final RLS is subject to requirements of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances, Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed, Council - member Kuefler and Councilmember Fi n ar were away from li> g y the table at the time of the vote. The City Manager introduced the next item of business on Planning Commission the agenda, that of Planning Commission Application No, Application No. 78021 78021 submitted by BCIP, Inc, (BCIP, Inc.) 5 --8 -7$ -12- Councilmember Kuefler and Councilmember Fignar returned to the table at 9:13 p.m. The Director of Planning and Inspection proceeded with a review of Planning Commission Application No. 78021 and the Planning Commission action at its April 27, 1978 meeting. He stated that the applicant sought preliminary registered land survey approval of a resubdivision of the area located in the 1600 - 1900 block on Freeway Boulevard. He next reviewed a transparency of the area showing the layout of the proposed registered land survey. He stated that the resubdivision was for the property south of Freeway Boule- vard between Shingle Creek Parkway and the west boundary of the Holiday Inn property. He explained that the land is zoned I -1 (industrial park) which comprehends both light industrial uses and special commercial uses. He pointed out that the proposed registered land survey would result in a total of nine tracts, two of which would be dedicated for public street purposes. He reported that the property located to the south of this subdivision would eventually be turned back to private use with the closing of the Humboldt Avenue interchange and that the roadway dedication was needed so that this parcel would not be landlocked. The Director of Planning and Inspection reported that the installation of the roadway was not anticipated for the immediate future. He explained that while the Holiday Inn Property currently has a 5 foot greenstrip along the west boundary line which was permitted by the ordinance, that when the street is installed a 15 foot greenstrip would be required. He noted that the street could be installed in such a manner that there would be a 25 foot boulevard along the east side of the roadway which would provide for a 15 foot greenstrip by the Holiday Inn property, A brief discussion ensued relative to the procedures for turning back highway property with the Director of Planning a,nd Inspection and the City Engineer commenting on this process. Public Hearing Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for purposes of a public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 78021. No one spoke relating to the application, Close Public Motion by Councilmember Fignar and seconded by Council Hearing member Scott to close the public hearing. on Planning Commission Application No. 78021. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scotto Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Action Approving Following further discussion there was a motion by Council- Planning Commission member Scott and seconded by Councilmember Kuefler to Application No. 78021 approve Planning Commission Application No. 78021 (BLIP, Inc) submitted by BCIP, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. The final RLS is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer, 2. The final RLS is subject to the requirements of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 3. The final RLS shall be filed and recorded with Hennepin County prior to the occupancy of any development therein. _13- 5 -8 -78 Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Pignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The r motion passed unanimously. The City Manager introduced the next item of business on Planning Commission the agenda, -that of Planning Commission Application No. Application No. 78023 78023 submitted by BLIP, Inc, (BCIP, Inc,) The Director of Plannin g p and Inspection proceeded with a review of Planning Commission Application No. 78023 and the Planning Commission action at its April 27, 1978 meeting. He stated that the applicant is seeking approval of site and building plans and a special use permit for commercial use in the I -1 (industrial park) zone, consisting of a bowling alley, restaurant and cocktail lounge. He noted that approval ' of the special use permit at this time is exclusive of the } proposed recreational games portions of the operation. He explained that this was due to the Council's concern over recreational uses of this nature which include pinball machines and game rooms. He added that the applicant has been asked to meet with the staff so that concerns such as hours of operation and "house rules" can be established. He pointed out that a final recom- mendation regarding this portion of the special use permit will. be made: by the Planning Commission following such a meeting. The Director of Planning and Inspection next reviewed the site plans and a lengthy discussion ensued relative to the application. He noted that different ordinance standards are used for determining parking for bowling alleys and for restaurants and that there are 281 spaces required for the establishment and the applicant has indicated that a 287 spaces can be provided, Mayor Nyquist recognized Mr. Al Beisner, representi7 BLIP who commented further on the building design ana site plan. Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for purposes of a Public Hearing public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 78023. No one spoke relating to the application, The Director of Planning and Inspection commented that he had received a call from Mary Carroll, an attorney representing Prudential- Insurance, who wished to go on record as expressing concern with the adequ.-.;: of the security area; traffic considerations; that there be sufficient restrictions on the special use; that the development will conform to the general characteristics of the existing development; and that the use and operation of the proposed development won't conflict with the "sedate existing uses. He pointed out that Ms. Carroll seemed satisfied with the explanations given to her over the phone regarding the application but still wished to be on record as having expressed these concerns. Councilmember Kuefler commented on the traffic problems at the intersection of Xerxes and 69th Avenue North, He pointed out that this is somewhat of a blind intersection and inquired if any plans were in the offing to correct this situation. The Director of Public Works responded that the County envisions upgrading 69th Avenue North in this area and there is a possibility that a traffic signal will be installed at that location. Motion by Councilmember Fignar and seconded by Close Public Councilmember Lhotka to close the public hearing on Hearing Planning Commission Application No. 78023. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously, 5 -8 -78 -,n Action Approving Following further discussion there was a motion by Council -- Planning Commission member Kuefler and seconded by Councilmember Scott to Application No. 78023 approve Planning Commission Application No. 78023 subject (BCIP, Inc.) n E ) to the following conditions: s. 1. The permit is issued to the owner as operator of the facility and is not transferable. 2. A special use permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations including special licensing provisions and violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation, 3. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official prior to the issuance of permits. 4. Site grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits 5. A performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted to assure com- pletion of all site improvements 6. All outside trash disposal facilities and any rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 7. Bicycle parking racks shall be provided. 8. Approval is exclusive of the proposed recreational "game room" facilities which shall be subject to further review after the applicant has had the opportunity to review earlier similar approvals and to submit proposed management. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Planning Commission The Director of Planning and Inspection proceeded with a Application No. 78024 review of Planning Commission Application No. 78024 (BCIP, Inc,) submitted by BCIP, Inc. and the Planning Commission action' at its April 27, 1978 meeting. He stated that the application was for a special use permit for live entertainment in the bowling alley considered under Application No. 78023 previously approved by the Council. He explained that the applicant intends to have a piano or organ player on the premises and it is not their intention to have a band'. He noted that the applicant also intends to have hours of opera- tion coinciding with the hours permitted by the liquor license ordinance. Public Hearing Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for purposes of a public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 78024. No one spoke relating to the application. Close Public Motion by Councilmember Fignar and seconded by Council- Hearing member Kuefler to close the public hearing- on Planning Commission Application No. 78024. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. -15- 5 -8 -78 V i Mayor Nyquist recognized Mr. Al Beisner representing 3CIP and a discussion ensued relative to the application. Council - member Fignar inquired if the hours of live entertainment should be stipulated in the special use permit. The Director of Planning and Inspection responded that the Council could, if they desired, stipulate this but that the hours of entertain- ment would not be able to exceed those listed in the liquor license ordinance. He pointed out that if there is a p problem because this is a special use permit, the Council could stipulate hours o p o f operation at some future time. Mr. Beisner introduced Jim Madden, who will operate the facility. Mr. Madden commented on the live entertainment proposed and added that he has met with the deputy chief of police regarding the liquor license requirements and conditions involved with the game room facilities. Following further discussion there was a motion by Council- Action Approving member Fignar and seconded by Councilmember Kuefler Planning Commission to approve Planning Commission Application No. 78024 Application No. 78024 submitted by BLIP, Inc., subject to the following conditions; (BLIP, Inc,) 1. The permit is issued to the owner as operator of the facility and is not transferable, 2. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations, including special licensing requirements and violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scotto Voting against: none. Thv motion passed unanimously. Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution RESOLUT10N and :moved its adoption: NO. 78 -82 RESOLUTION APPROVING LAND DIVISION FOR HENNEPiN COUNTY REGIONAL LIBRARY SITE The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Tony Kuefler, and upon voted being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the sarr:�:: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly pauacd and adopted. Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION and moved its adoption: NO. 78 -83 RESOLUTION URGING FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION BY HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION ALONG COUNTY ROAD 130 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member, Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the ,following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. d p . 5-8 -78 _16- RESOLUTION Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution` and NO, 78 -84 moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF TEN USED VOTING MACHINES The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution NO 78 -85 and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF STREET SWEEPER GUTTER BROOMS AND BRUSHES The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and NO. 78 -86 moved its adoption RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF REFLECTORIZED MATERIALS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Policy for Deferring The City Manager introduced the next item of business on Special Assessments the agenda, that of a resolution recommended for the purpose of establishing a policy for deferring special assessments for low income senior citizens. He explained that the Council had directed such a draft resolution at the last Council meeting, He noted that the resolution makes a determination that deferral of special assessments for certain senior citizens is in the public interests and establishes a policy for deferring these assessments provided the property upon which the assessment is deferred be homesteaded; that the property is owned by a person at least 65 years of age on January 1 of the payment year; and that the household income is not in excess of $7,500 the year preceding the payment year, The Director of Public Works further reviewed the policy for deferring special assessments and cited various examples which indicated how the policy would work In response to an inquiry by Councilmember Kuefler, the Director of Public Works stated that the proposed policy incorporates a number of the better criteria used by other communities in the area. -17 5 -8 -78 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION and moved its adoption: NO. 78 -87 RESOLUTION RELATING TO DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PERSONS 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER AND ESTABLISHING AN INTEREST RATE The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: . Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION and moved its adoption: NO. 78 -88 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION and moved its adoption: NO, 78 -89 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTWiC'i FORM (SIDEWALK CONTRACT 1 978 -B) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution VIM.3 duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dz:an Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and RESOLUTION moved its adoption: NO. 78 -90 RESOLUTION ORDERING CONSTRUCTION OF SIDES ^T. Lv IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS NO. 1977 -12, 1978 -15 AND 1978 -16 AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Gene Lhotka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following ordinance and ORDINANCE moved its adoption: NO. 78 -8 r AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF PENN AVENUE NORTH j THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 5 -8 -78. -18- Section 1 . That ortion of Penn Avenue North lyin northerly of the northern most line exten east erl - Y - of Registered Lan S urvey No, 1256 and southerly of th n orth li ne of Lot 32 Subdivision No. 218, Hennepin County, Minnesota, is hereby vacated as a p street. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this 8th day of May, 1978, The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and upon vote beinc taken thereon, the following voted - in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefl.er, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. Parking Prohibition in The City Manager reported that the City Council at its Twin Lake Beach Park April 24, 1978 meeting had directed the City Manager to Area prepare the necessary action to permit a ban on parking in the Twin Lake Beach Park area pursuant to the recom- mendation made by the Park and Recreation Commission He briefly reviewed that the City Manager has the authority to initiate such a parking ban based on a recom- mendation from the police chief and the city engineer. He pointed out that the question has come up as to whether the Council wishes to continue utilizing this type policy for parking bans or if they wish to develop a new policy. The Director of Public Works briefly reviewed the policy for administratively instituting various parking bans in the City. A lengthy discussion ensued relative to the policy. Following the discussion the City Manager stated that he would proceed to establish a parking ban in that area on a seasonal basis. The Director of Public Works pointed out that the main concern for instituting a parking ban in that area would be to develop such a ban that provides uniformity. Councilmember Scott noted that during this time of the year a number of people living in the area have graduation or other special type parties which might cause some parking Problems in the area. She requested the City Manager to review this in more detail and determine if it might be feasible to institute a policy which could address this problem. Hennepin Emergency The City Manager reported that the City Council has been Communications presented a draft resolution relating to pledging Brooklyn Organization Center's emergency radio frequencies to the Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization (HECO). He explained that the resolution reaffirms the City's previous . commitment made in a joint powers agreement establishing HECO. He pointed out that this resolution serves as a i commitment on the City's part to transfer its emergency radio frequencies to HECO at such time as they would be needed to implement an integrated public safety communica- tions plan. The City Manager reported that in order to coordinate our planning with the proposed 911 system, HECO must complete its plan by April, 1979. He added that this plan -19- a 5 -8 -78 reduces the number of dispatch points in Hennepin County, { and it appears it will provide substantial savings in tax dollars. . He noted that the actual transfer of the Brooklyn Center's radio frequencies will require additional Council action, and that the resolution recommended is conditioned upon the adoption of a consolidation plan by April 1, 1979; that a sufficient number of frequencies are pledged; and that the plan can be implemented. A brief discussion ensued relative to the City Manager's report and recommendation. In response to a Council inquiry, the City Manager stated that basically if all public safety organizations in the area get together there will be enough frequencies for use in the system. He pointed out that Brooklyn Center's frequency is presently, based on a comparison with other frequencies in the metropolitan area, under used. He pointed out that Brooklyn Center could handle more calls than are presently being handled, utilizing the present facilities. Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION and moved its adoption: NO. 78 -91 PLEDGE OF BROOKLYN CENTER'S EMERGENCY RADIO FREQUENCIES TO THE HENNEPIN EMERGENCY COMMUNI- CATIONS ORGANIZATION The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. The City Manager reported that he has received an offer Fire Insurance from the Home Insurance Company td settle the fire Clain; insurance claim for the old city hall located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard. He explained that the insurance company has offered to settle the claim for $208,987. He noted that this figure is the result of much negotiation on the part of the Director of Finance and the City Attorney and that he feels it is an adequate settlement. He further stated that although he has the authority to settle such a claim, he wished to have City Council concurrence before accepting the final settlemen:.- Following further discussion there was a motion by Action to Ccncu.° with Councilmember Kuefler, seconded by Councilmember City Manager's Fignar to concur with the City Manager's recommendation Recommendation to settle with the Home Insurance Company in an amount of $208,987 for fire damage to the old city hall located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard. .• Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, anca Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Nyquist commented that recently there seems to be Other Business much debris in the area between 53rd and 55th Avenues ,North and Brooklyn Bouelvard. He stated that it also seems that much of the debris is coming from the Red Owl Country Store and requested the City Manager to review this matter to see if something can be done to correct the problem. 5 -8-78 -20- Licenses Motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Council- member Fignar to approve the following list of licenses: I BULK VENDOR LICENSE Phil Johnson Vending Sales 5821 Drew Ave. No. i i MECHANICAL SYSTEM'S LICENSE Air Conditioning Assoc., Inc. 689 Pierce Butler Rt. Hutton & Rowe, Inc. 217 VanBuren St. Mill City Heating & Air Cond. 13005 B. 16th Ave. No. Trane Home Comfort Center 880 Colorado Ave. So. MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIP LICENSE Bob Ryan Oldsmobile 6700 Brooklyn Blvd. NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE David Bauermeister 5809 Boone Ave. No. Pizza Factory 6816 Humboldt Ave. No. RENTAL DWELLING LICENSE Initial: Bertil G. Johnson 6107 Brooklyn Blvd. Michael K.Uzzell 5235,37 Drew Ave. No. John Westlund 5137,39 France Ave. No Leroy Crowell 6024 Halifax Place Virgil L. Hillstrom 5907,09 June Ave. No. Roland Scherber 5820 Logan Ave. No. G. R. Anderson 2913 65th Ave. No. Renewal: Robert W. Johnson 6801 Scott Ave. No. i } SWIMMING POOL LICENSE Chippewa Park Apts. 6507 Camden Ave. No. Columbus Village Apts. 507 70th Ave. No. Riverwood Townhomes Assoc. 6611 Camden Dr. No. Twin Lake North Apts. 4536 58th Ave. No. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhfltka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The .motion passed unanimously. Adjournment Motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded by Council - member Fignar to adjourn the meeting. Voting in favor Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 10:38 p.m. Clerk Ma r i -21- 5 -8 -78.