HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977 03-28 CCM Regular Session MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
MARCH 28, 1977
CITY HALL
Call to Order The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session
and was called to order by Mayor Philip Cohen at
7:30 p.m.
Roll Call Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar, and
Lhotka. Also present were City Manager Donald Poss,
Director of Public Works James Merila, City Attorney
Richard Sch.ieffer, Director of Finance Paul Holmlund,
Director of Planning and Inspection Blair Tremere, and
Administrative Assistants Brad Hoffman and Ronald
Warren.
Invocation The invocation was offered by Pastor Carl Groettum of
the Cross of Glory Church.
Approval of Minutes Motion by Councilman Lhotka and seconded by
3 -14 -77 Councilman Fignar to approve the minutes of the
March 14, 1977 City Council meeting as submitted.
Voting in favor: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Kuefler,
Fignar, and Lhotka`. Voting against: none. The motion
passed. Councilman Britts abstained as he was not at
that meeting.
Kaleidoscope The City Manager introduced Jan Noonan, Co- chairperson
Presentation for B. C. Kaleidoscope '77. Mrs. Noonan announced
that Brooklyn Center Community Education is again
sponsoring a Kaleidoscope event to be held on April 24,
1977 at Brooklyn Center High School. She introduced
Henry Dorff, June Scofield, Tom Sollberger and Mary
Ellen Vetter, members of the Kaleidoscope Committee
who were in attendance this evening to seek the
support of the City Council for B. C. Kaleidoscope '77.
She added that the committee is seeking three things
from the City Council regarding the event: City
participation, a resolution proclaiming April 24, 1977
as Kaleidoscope day in Brooklyn Center, and financial
assistance. Mayor Cohen inquired if the committee
had contacted the City Manager regarding financial
contributions, to which Mr. Dorff responded in the
negative.
The City Manager commented that plans are being
developed for various City display booths at
Kaleidoscope. He added that the City, by law, is
prohibited from making contributions or donations, but
that it is expected that an agreement can be made
whereby the City would be billed for its participation
in Kaleidoscope.
Following a brief discussion members of the
Kaleidoscope Committee distributed Kaleidoscope
buttons to members of the City Council.
RESOLUTION Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution
NO. 77 -46 and moved its adoption:
r
-1- 3 -28 -77
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AND DECLARING APRIL 24
1977 AS BC KALEIDOSCOPE '77 DAY
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Maurice Britts, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler,
Bill Fignar,_ and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted
against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Lhotka announced that Wednesday, Legislative Day
March 30, 1977 is Legislative Day at the State Capitol.
He explained that Brooklyn Center Community Education
will have a display booth at the event and is inviting
members of the City Council and the citizens of Brooklyn
Center to attend.
Motion by Councilman Kuefler and seconded by Park Service Area
Councilman Lhotka to accept the resignations of the Resignations
following Park Service Area Committee members and
direct the City Manager to prepare resolutions of
commendation: Mary Andreen, Park Service Area III;
Jan Thunell, Park Service Area III; Bruce Anderson,
Park Service Area IV; Joe Hill, Park Service Area IV;
Yvonne Quady, Park Service Area V. Voting in favor:
Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar, and
Lhotka. Voting against: -none. The motion passed
unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Kuefler and seconded by Park Service Area
Councilman Britts to confirm Mayor Cohen's appointment Appointments
of the following Park Service Area Committee members:
Park Service Area I
James Boone
5446 Humboldt Avenue North
Gerald Olejar
2406 55th Avenue North
Alfred Magnuson
5907 Colfax Avenue North
David Larson
5537 Camden Avenue North
Park Service Area II
Clayton Ditty
7131 Knox Avenue North
Bob Oberstar
7243 Emerson Avenue North
Mary Ulm
700 8 Oliver Avenue North
Dorothy Boman
6419 Dupont Avenue North
Chuck Abrams
7218 Newton Avenue North
3 -28 -77 -2-
Park Service Area III
Ernie Johnson
5419 67th Avenue North
Jim Knight
7107 Palmer Lake Road
George Olzenak
6942 Ewing Avenue North
Richard Mika
4806 69th Avenue North
Nancy Lotthammer
6806 Scott Avenue North
Park Service Area IV
Brian Mortenson
4612 65th Avenue North
Harriet Markeson
5918 Upton Avenue North
Janet Reardon
2713 63rd Avenue North
Park Servic Area V
Jeanette Baker
5012 Abbott Avenue North
Terrance Mitchell
3825 58th Avenue North
Diane Schake
4740 Twin Lake Avenue
Jerry Evans
5049 Brooklyn Boulevard
Voting in favor: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts,
Kuefler, Fignar, and Lhotka . Voting against: none.
The motion passed unanimously.
Performance Bond The City Manager introduced the next item of business
Release (F. B. S. on the agenda, that of a recommendation that the City
Financial Corporation) Council authorize release of a $1 , 000 site performance
cash escrow posted by F. B. S. Financial Corporation
for site upgrading improvements at the former Kennedy
& Cohen building. He explained that the cash escrow
was posted by F. B. S. on behalf of the J. Y. J.
Company on October 18, 1976 to assure various site
improvements at that location to be undertaken during
the spring and summer construction season of 1977. He
added that J. Y. J. Company had ceased its business
operation at that site prior to January 1 , 1977, and
because of this the improvements will not be undertaken.
Motion by Councilman Fignar and seconded by
Councilman Britts to authorize release of a $1,000 site
performance bond posted by F. B. S Financial
Corporation on behalf of J. Y. J. Company for site
upgrading improvements at the former Kennedy & Cohen
building. Voting in favor: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen
Britts, Kuefler, Fignar, and Lhotka. Voting against:
none. The motion passed unanimously.
-3- 3 -28 -77
Motion by Councilman Kuefler and seconded by Subdivision Bond
Councilman Lhotka to authorize the release of a $725 Release (Bobendrier's
subdivision bond posted on behalf of Bobendrier's Third Addition)
Third Addition on the basis that obligations guaranteed
by that bond have been satisfied. Voting in favor:
Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar, and
Lhotka. Voting against: none. The motion passed
unanimously.
Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION
and moved its adoption: NO. 77 -47
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND
APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE
OF DR. R. I. SHRAGG
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Gene Lhotka, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony'Kuefler,
Bill Fignar, and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted
against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
Mayor Cohen requested the City Manager to invite
Dr. R. I. Shragg to the April 11 , 1977 City Council
meeting so that this resolution of commendation could
be formally presented to Dr. Shragg.
Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION
and moved its adoption: NO. 77 -48`
RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING WITHDRAWAL OF
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 77007
SUBMITTED BY MR. TWIG LEININGER
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler,
Bill Fignar, and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted
against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION
and moved its adoption: NO. 77 -49
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS FOR ONE AGGREGATE
SPREADER
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Maurice Britts, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler,
Bill Fignar, and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted
against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION
and moved its adoption: NO. 77 -50
RESOLUTION REJECTING BIDS FOR LINE STRIPING
MACHINE
3 -28 -77 -4-
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Tony Kuefler, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler,
Bill Fignar, and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted
against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution
NO. 77 -51 and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF TRAFFIC
MARKING PAINT
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Maurice Britts, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler,
Bill Fignar, and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted
against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
Planning Commission The City Manager introduced the next item'of business,
Application No. 77001 that of Planning Commission Application No. 77001
(Richard Rockstad) submitted by Richard Rockstad.
The Director of Planning and Inspection proceeded with
a review of Planning Commission Application No. 77001
and the Planning Commission action at its January 27,
March 10, and March 24, 1977 meetings. He stated
that the applicant requests rezoning, from R -5 (multiple
residence) to C -1 (service /office /commercial), of the
property at the northeast corner of 70th and Brooklyn
Boulevard. He explained that the property consisted of
two parcels, 7000 and 7006 Brooklyn Boulevard, with
the parcel to the north presently containing a single
family dwelling which until approximately two years ago
was occupied by the applicant's real estate firm. He
further explained that the structure has recently been
rented as a residence and that the applicant proposes
to remove the existing structure and erect an office
building. He added that a public hearing was held at
the January 27 Planning Commission meeting at which
time the residents of 7014 Brooklyn Boulevard and 7015
Kyle Avenue North had voiced objection to the rezoning
request. He explained that the Planning Commission
after a brief review of the application had tabled the
matter and referred it to the Northwest Neighborhood
Advisory Group for review and comment.
The Director of Planning and Inspection stated that the
Planning Commission had again considered this
application on March 10, 1977 at which time a public
hearing was held and the Northwest Neighborhood
Advisory Group's recommendation was considered. He
reported that a lengthy discussion regarding this
rezoning request had taken place at that time concerning
whether or not the proposal was consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, whether the request represents
spot zoning, whether the proposed land use represents
the highest and best use for the land, and whether the
proposal is consistent with the best interests of the
community. He stated that the Northwest Neighborhood
Advisory Group had submitted a written report and
-5- 3 -28 -77
recommended that the present zoning be retained. He
reported that the applicant had claimed that the area was
flexible for either office or apartment uses and that the
R -5 and C -1 zoning were compatible. He further
claimed that in his opinion each of the other R -5 parcels
containing nonconforming uses was large enough to
support small but viable C -1 developments. He, stated
that the Planning Commission felt that a formal deter-
mination of whether C -1 zoning was the best use of this
area was premature and that further analysis of the
Comprehensive Plan would have to be done prior to any
recommendation for rezoning. He explained that the
Planning Commission had offered the applicant the option
of either tabling the application to allow adequate time
to review the Comprehensive Plan and related matters,
or to direct a draft resolution recommending immediate
disposition to the City Council. He stated that the
applicant, Mr. Rockstad, preferred that the matter be
referred to the City Council as soon as possible.
The Director of Planning and Inspection stated that the
Planning Commission at its March 24, 1977 meeting had
considered a draft resolution recommending denial of
Application No. 77001 and had formally adopted it for
consideration by the City Council. He noted that the
applicant had submitted a petition that had been
circulated among the property owners within 350 feet of
the property which contained 22 validated signatures
representing 22 individual properties that were in favor
of, or saw no objection to, the rezoning request.
The Director of Planning and Inspection next reviewed
transparencies showing the location and configuration
of the property in question, pointing out the current
zoning for neighboring properties. He also reviewed
various slides showing pictorial layout of the area.
A lengthy discussion ensued relative to the slides and
the transparencies with the Director of Planning and
Inspection commenting to various questions regarding
the zoning of property south of the old City Hall to 70th
and Brooklyn Boulevard. The Director of Planning and
Inspection noted that the Planning Commission had
recommended denial of this application because of "spot
zoning" aspects, neighboring property owners were not
in favor of the rezoning, the Northwest Neighborhood
Advisory Group had submitted a written recommendation
that the present rezoning be retained, that the proposal
is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and that
the Planning Commission had not had an opportunity to
thoroughly review the Comprehensive Plan and zoning for
this area subsequent to a recommendation for C -1 zoning
for a larger area
Mayor Cohen recognized the applicant, Mr. Richard
Rockstad, who showed the City Council an artist's
conception of the type of office building he would like to
build on the property. He stated that the property was
best suited for a small office building and could be
developed within ordinance standards and would be com-
patible with the area. He added that he had bought the
property approximately ten years ago with this in mind.
Mr. Rockstad further stated that he has spoken with
Father Dowd of St. Alphonsus Church, which owns much
of the land east of the property in question. He stated
3 -28 -77 -6-
that Father Dowd was not opposed to the rezoning and
had stated that the proposed use might well be an
improvement to the area.
Councilman Kuefler .inquired if the property, with the
proposed building, would support adequate parking.
The Director of Planning and Inspection responded that
three drawings have been seen thus far and that only
one of these drawings indicated a configuration which
would permit space for required parking. Councilman
Fignar inquired if there was a difference between the
permitted height of a building in an R -5 zone and a
C -1 zone. The Director of Planning and Inspection
responded that three stories are the maximum height
for buildings in both zones.
Public Hearing Mayor Cohen opened the meeting to notified property
owners and recognized Mrs. Hagen, 7015 Kyle Avenue
North, who stated that she opposed the rezoning for
the same reasons she had expressed before the
Planning Commission, that being that she felt her
residential property value would be adversely affected.
She added that it was her opinion that the request
represented "spot zoning" and that she preferred the
property remain R -5 She commented that Mr.
Baumeister, 7014 Brooklyn Boulevard, who was out of
town and unable to attend this evening's meeting, feels
the same way. Councilman Fignar inquired of Mrs.
Hagen if she would object if apartments were built on
this property. Mrs. Hagen responded that she would
not object, nor would Mr. Baumeister. Mayor Cohen
stated that it would be inappropriate to accept Mr.
Baumeister's comments; other than those already in
the record. He added that Mr. Baumeister could submit
a letter expressing additional concerns or comments
that would be considered.
Mayor Cohen then read a letter from the Northwest
Neighborhood Advisory Committee indicating that
group's recommendation that the present zoning (R -5)
be retained.
Mayor Cohen stated that he would like to see the
Council review the Comprehensive Plan more closely
and that it was his recollection that the Plan addresses
R -5 and C -1 zones as being quite similar and com-
patible. He added that the old City Hall is zoned R -5
but that the upcoming use of the building by CEAP is
more of a C -1 type use. The Director of Planning and
Inspection responded that the Comprehensive Plan
speaks of the similarity of R -5 and C -1 zones for
planned development areas and that the Planning
Commission was not opposed to C -1 type uses in this
area but would want to look at the entire area for
possible rezoning rather than just the two parcels
requested by the applicant. He added that the applicant
had expressed his desire to pursue the application on
its own merits
Close Public Following further discussion there was a motion by
-Hearing Councilman Lhotka and seconded by Councilman Fignar
to close the public hearing with the understanding
that questions could be put forth to the applicant and
Mrs. Hagen if the need arises during the Council's
-7- 3 -28 -77
deliberation. - Voting in favor: Mayor Cohen,
Councilmen Britts Kuefler, Fignar, and Lhotka
Voting against: none. The motion passed unani-
mously.
A lengthy discussion ensued relative to the application
with Councilman Kuefler expressing the opinion that
this area might be more conducive to C -1 rather than
R -5 zoning. Councilman Fignar stated that there was
merit to the applicant's C -1 rezoning request and
inquired of the City Attorney as to the proper manner
for the City Council to proceed to consider such a
rezoning request and avoid the "spot zoning" dilemna.
The City Attorney responded that it would not be considered
"spot zoning" to rezone an area recommended for a
particular zoning by the City's Comprehensive Plan. He
stated that in this case it would be proper to conduct a
study to determine whether C -1 zoning was proper. If
such a study so indicated, the Comprehensive Plan
could be amended and the City Council could proceed to
rezone the property.
In response to an inquiry by Councilman Lhotka the
Director of Planning and Inspection stated that there is
no documented evidence that would indicate that C -1
zoning would decrease the value of surrounding residential
property. Councilman Fignar stated the opinion that
C -1 , service /office building type uses are generally more
compatible to surrounding R -1 properties than are the R -5
type apartment uses. He added that apartments often
have a more disrupting effect on a single family
residential neighborhood than an office building with
normal 9 5 hours.
Mayor Cohen cautioned that any subsequent rezoning
action should be undertaken in a proper manner based on
a finding of facts. He added that even though the
Comprehensive Plan must be reviewed within the next
few years, the City cannot stand still and not address
problems of this nature. He recommended that there be
more study of the matter to see` if there is a valid basis
for recommending an amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan. Councilman Britts `commented relative to several
problems related to rezoning in this area and also urged
careful study prior to proceeding.
The City Manager stated that if the City Council 'sees
the proposed development as an asset and deserving of
more study, then alternatives for implementing the con-
cepts can be looked at. He added that the Council should
also determine if the proposal is beneficial to the
community as a whole as well. Councilman Fignar stated
that he would like to see options developed within a
reasonable time period. The City Manager commented
that such options could be before the City Council within
four weeks.
Following further discussion there was a motion by Action Continuing
Councilman Fignar and seconded by Councilman Kuefler Planning Commission
to continue Planning Commission Application No. 77001 Application No. 77001
on the basis that the proposal would be beneficial to the and Requesting Further
area and the community and to direct the preparation of Review and Study
options for implementing the proposal. Voting in favor:
i
Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar, and
Lhotka . Voting against: none. The motion passed
unanimously.
3 -28 -77 -8-
Recess The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 9:.10 p.m.
and resumed at 9 :30 p.m.
Liquor License The next. item of business was consideration of a request
(Cicero's) by Cicero's Restaurant, 5717 Xerxes Avenue North, for
an on sale intoxicating liquor license and a Sunday on
sale intoxicating liquor license.
The City Manager introduced the item by reporting that
the police department has completed an investigation
of the principals involved in the application and that
a copy of that report has been submitted to the City
Council. He stated that other requisites to the
issuance of a liquor license have been met by the
applicant. He further stated that on the basis of the
background investigation and personal observations of
the past management operations at Cicero's, it is
recommended that the City Council authorize the
issuance of the liquor licenses.
Mayor Cohen recognized Mr. Belknap, representing
Cicero's Restaurant. Mr. Belknap stated that Cicero's
looks at its operation as that of a family type
restaurant and not as a bar business. He explained
that Cicero's does not plan to have a bar in the normal
sense of the word and that there would be no area with
bar stools, etc. for serving intoxicating liquor. He
added that patrons would be served at tables if they
desire alcoholic beverages.
Mr. Belknap stated that in other similar operations,
such as in Toronto, Canada, where intoxicating liquor
is served, only about 12% of sales is made up of liquor,
wine and beer. He added that Cicero's is seeking the
intoxicating licenses in an effort to move toward
becoming a full service, moderate price, family
restaurant, and that liquor will be used only to stimulate
the restaurant aspect of the business
Mayor Cohen complimented the Cicero's operation as
being a credit to the community. He inquired of Mr.
Belknap if Cicero's was aware of the potential liquor
related problems that might arise because they tend to
attract a younger clientele. Mr. Belknap responded
that he was well aware of the potential problems and
reviewed Cicero's present policy regarding their sale
of nonintoxicating malt liquor. He stated that Cicero's
strictly abides by the requirements of the City ordinance
and they do not serve individuals that do not have
proper identification. He added that it is also Cicero's
policy to not serve alcoholic beverages to a group of
persons if one of that group fails to produce proper
identification.
In response to an inquiry by Councilman Kuefler, Mr.
Belknap stated that management of Cicero's is pleased
with their business and plans to continue its operation
for some time. He reiterated that they are in the
restaurant business primarily and that the liquor
business would only be a secondary aspect to the
entire operation.
-9- 3 -28 -77
v
t
Following a brief discussion there was a motion by Action Authorizing
Councilman Britts and seconded by Councilman Lhotka the Issuance of a
to authorize the issuance of an on sale intoxicating Liquor. License
liquor license to Cicero's Restaurant, 5717 Xerxes
Avenue North. Voting in favor: Mayor Cohen,
Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar, ar.d Lhotka. Voting
against: none. ` The motion passed unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Fignar and seconded by Action Authorizing
Councilman Kuefler to authorize the issuance of an on the Issuance of a
sale intoxicating Sunday liquor license to Cicero's Sunday Liquor License
Restaurant, 5717 Xerxes Avenue North. Voting in favor:
Mayor ,Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar, and
Lhotka. Voting against: none. The motion passed
unanimously.
The City Manager introduced the next item of business, Planning Commission
that of Planning Commission Application No. 77009 Application No. 77009
submitted by Roger Lange. He stated that this appli- (Roger Lange)
cation was originally considered by the City Council
at its February 28, 1977 meeting and tabled for
additional information. He further stated that the
additional information was provided to the Council at its
meeting of March 14, 1977 but the applicant requested a
continuation to this evening's meeting in order to com-
plete tentative lease arrangements required by the City
Council as a prerequisite to consideration of the matter.
He explained that the City has instituted written com-
munication with Mr. Lange regarding the Council's
request for a tentative lease arrangement information but
has received no written or verbal contact from Mr. Lange.
He further explained that Mr. Lange was contacted by
phone this evening and that he had stated he forgot about
the meeting and asked for a continuation. The City
Manager reported that Mr. Lange had also informed him
that he is prepared to present a letter of intent regarding
the lease. The City Manager stated that Mr. Zitzloff,
owner of the building at 4321 68th Avenue North, is
present and will respond to Council questions regarding
his knowledge of the application.,
Mayor Cohen recognizes' Mr. Zitzloff who commented
relative to Mr. Lange's proposal. He stated that Mr.
Lange had assured him that the operation was geared
primarily for sales, although there would be a recreation,
center on the site. He further stated that he was a little
leery of the operation but felt that if the City Council
would give its approval he would not object. Mr. Zitzloff
added that he is somewhat disturbed that Mr. Lange does
not seem to be interested enough to be at this evening's
Council meeting,
Mayor Cohen pointed' out the City Council's apprehension
regarding the proposed application in that Mr. Lange had
not given the City staff and the Planning Commission a
full disclosure regarding his similar operation in Fridley.
The Mayor added that the City had experienced a number
of problems with another recreation center that was
operated in the Humboldt Square Shopping Center
approximately two years ago. He further stated that
there have been successful recreation centers operated
in the City primarily due to an effective management
technique. The Mayor commented that he was quite dis-
turbed because of Mr. Lange's failure to appear at this
evening's meeting.
3-28-77 -10-
Mr. Zitzloff stated that he has checked Mr. Lange's
references and that they seem to be in order. He
further stated that he understands the City Council's
concern over the manner in which the applicant has
dealt with the Council and also the problems
associated with the applicant's proposal. He added
that whatever action the City Council decides to take
will be acceptable to him.
In response to an inquiry by Councilman Lhotka, Mr.
Zitzloff stated that he was prepared to offer Mr. Lange
a one year lease.
Mayor Cohen inquired if the City Council could dispose
of this applicant this evening or if it should be held
over. The City Manager responded that certain dis-
courtesies have been displayed by the applicant which
may seem to indicate the applicant's intent. He
commented that the Council has received all of the
documentation requested except for a finalized lease
arrangement and could take action if it so desired. He
recommended that any Council action be in the form of
a resolution.
Councilman Lhotka suggested continuing the application
for another two weeks, stating that he would like_the
opportunity to confront the applicant.
Action Continuing Following a brief discussion there was a motion by
Planning Commission Councilman Britts and seconded by Councilman Lhotka
Application No. 77009 to continue Planning Commission Application No. 77009
(Roger Lange) submitted by Roger Lange until April 11 , 1977 at the
request of the applicant, noting that the applicant had
failed to appear and had failed to produce the infor
mation requested by the City Council. Voting in favor:
Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar, and
Lhotka. Voting against: none.- The motion passed
unanimously.
Amendment to Park The City Manager introduced the next item of business,
and Recreation that of a resolution recommended for the purpose of
Commission Resolution amending the Park and 'Recreation Commission resolution
(Resolution No. 73 -25) to eliminate the annual appoint-
ment procedure for Park Service Area Committee members
presently contained in that resolution. He briefly
reviewed the makeup, duties and responsibilities, and
the appointment procedures of the Park Service Area
Committee members. He stated that in addition to the
burdensome amount of record keeping associated with
these appointments, it is no easy task to secure
members to serve on these area committees and that a
fixed term has the effect of inviting service termination.
He further stated that the effect of the resolution would
be to make appointments for an indefinite term at the
discretion and pleasure of the Mayor.
A lengthy discussion ensued relative to the resolution
with Councilman Britts commenting that an indefinite
appointment might be just as much of a record keeping
problem as that of a one year appointment. He added
that it might well be more difficult to attract people to
serve a long indefinite term than a shorter fixed term.
-11- 3 -28 -77
Further discussion ensued with it being the consensus of
the Council to modify the resolutioni to incorporate
language acknowledging that members may voluntarily
resign or be removed by the Mayor and that three con-
secutive unexcused absences would constitute automatic
resignation.
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION
and moved its adoption: NO. 77 -52
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 73 -25 WHICH
CONTINUED A BROOKLYN CENTER PARK AND RECREATION
COMMISSION AND REDEFINED THE DUTIES AND
RESPONSIBILITIES THEREFOR
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Tony Kuefler, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler,
Bill Fignar, and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted
against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was
declared duly passed and adopted.
Member Ma.urice Britts introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION
and moved its adoption: NO. 77 -53
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO LEASE
AGREEMENT
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Tony Kuefler, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler,
Bill Fignar, and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted
against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was
declared duly passed and adopted.
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION
and moved its adoption: NO. 77 -54
RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 75 -189 AND
ESTABLISHING WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.
1977 -7 AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 1977 -8 AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar,
and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted against the
same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared
duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Fignar left the table at 10:25 p.m.
Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION
and moved its adoption: NO. 77 -55
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
PROPOSED TRUNK WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 1977-1, SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 1977 -2, STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 1977 -3, AND CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1977 -4
3 -28 -77 -12-
i
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Maurice Britts, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler,
and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted against the
same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared
duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION Member Maurice Britts introduced the following
NO. 77 -56 resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1977 -5
AND STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.
1977 -6
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Gene Lhotka, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler,
and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted against the
same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared
duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution
NO. 77 -57 and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
PROPOSED WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.
1977 -7 AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 1977 -8
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Gene Lhotka, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler,
and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted against the
same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared
duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following
NO. 77 -58 resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS NO.
1977 -7, 1976 -10, AND 1977 -1; AND SANITARY SEWER
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS NO. 1977 -8, 1977 -2 AND
1977-5, AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
(CONTRACT 1977 -A)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member Maurice Britts, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler,
and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted against the
same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared
duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Fignar returned to the table at 10 :30 p.m.
'ORDINANCE Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following ordinance
NO. 77 -6 and moved its adoption:
:E
-13
3- 28_77
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 15 AND CHAPTER 35
OF THE CITY ORDINANCES RELATIVE TO SINGLE FAMILY
ATTACHED DWELLING UNITS
THE CITE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 . Sections 15-106 (c) , (e) , (f) , and (g) of
the City Ordinances are hereby amended in part to read
as follows:
(c) 15. Private Streets. With the exception of
condominium single family attached [ (townhouse)]
dwelling unit subdivisions, private streets shall
not be approved nor shall public improvements be
approved for any private street.
(e) 1 . Provided for Utilities. With the exception
of condominium single family attached f (townhouse))
dwelling unit subdivisions, easements at least
10 feet wide, centered on rear and other lot lines
shall be provided for utilities, where necessary.
They shall have continuity of alignment from
block to block, and at defection points. Ease-
ments for pole -line anchors shall be provided
where necessary.
(f) 4. Arrangements. With the exception of con-
dominium single family attached [ (townhouse)]
dwelling unit subdivisions, a block shall be so
designed as to provide two tiers of lots, unless
it adjoins a railroad or limited access highway
where it may have but a single tier of lots.
(g) 1 . Location. With the exception of lots in a
condominium single family attached [ (townhouse)]
dwelling unit subdivision, all lots shall abut by
their full frontage on a publicly dedicated street
or a street that has received the legal status as
such.
Section 2. Section 15 -111 of the City Ordinances is
hereby amended to read as follows:
BUILDING PERMIT With the exception of condominium
single family attached [ (townhouse)] dwelling unit sub -
divisions, no building permits shall be issued by any
governing official for the construction of any building,
structure or improvement on any land required to be sub-
divided by this ordinance until all requirements of this
ordinance have been fully complied with.
Section 3. Section 35 -312 1. (a) is hereby amended
to read as follows:
(a) Townhouse or garden apartments and condominium
single family attached dwelling units as defined
in Section 35 -900,
Section 4. Sections 35 -312 3. (b) (2) and (3) are
hereby amended to read as follows:
3 -28 -77 -14-
(2) At least 25% of the total number of dwelling'
units shall be [ R -3 type] townhouse /garden
apartments or condominium single family
attached dwelling units as defined in Section
35 -900;
(3) If the Planned Residential Development is to be
constructed in multiple phases, at least 20%
of the total number of dwelling units in each
phase shall be [ R -3 type] townhouse /garden
apartments or condominium single family
attached dwelling units, until the above
minimum requirement has been fulfilled;
Section 5. Section 35 -900 of the City Ordinances
is hereby amended by the addition of the following:
Condominium Single Family Attached Dwelling Units.
Two or more dwelling units horizontally attached in
a linear or cluster arrangement, with the individual
dwelling units separated from each other by a wall
or walls extending from foundation to roof, and with
each dwelling unit located upon a separate platted
lot. Characteristic features of such a development
include individual ownership of dwelling units, and
common (nonpublic) ownership of open areas, site
amenities, and recreation facilities'. A condomini
single family attached dwelling unit development
includes at least one large common area of open
space for aesthetic or recreational purposes.
Section 6. This ordinance shall become effective
after adoption and upon thirty (30) days following its
legal publication.
Adopted this 28th day of March, 1977.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing "ordinance
was duly seconded by member Gene Lhotka, and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler,
Bill Fignar, and Gene Lhotka; and the following voted
against the same: none, whereupon said ordinance
was declared duly passed and adopted.
Licenses Motion by Councilman Fignar and seconded by
Councilman Kuefler to approve the following licenses:
FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
Harron United Methodist
Church 5452 Dupont Ave. N.
Northbrook Alliance Church 6240 Aldrich Ave. N.
Pizza Factory 6816- Humboldt Ave. N.
ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
Sandra Smith Earle Brown School
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS LICENSE
Four Seasons Sheet
Metal, Inc. 2964 Jersey; Ave. N.
:E
-15- 3 -28 -77
V
NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
Brookdale Towers Apt. 6925 Humboldt Ave. N.
Coca Cola Bottling 1189 Eagan Ind. Road
Sears Brookdale
Minnesota Fabrics 5712 Morgan Ave. N.
READILY PERISHABLE FOOD FLEET LICENSE
Servomation 4301 68th Ave. N.
RENTAL DWELLING LICENSE
Initial:
Wilfird & Lillian Hollenbeck 5406 Bryant Ave. N.
Carin Lee Rudolph 5318 -20 Queen Ave. N.
Ronald & Esther Anderson 5328 -30 Queen Ave. N.
Gene & Anna Gullord 5337 -39 Queen Ave. N.
Richard Biggs 819 -21 55th Ave. N.
Alfred & Myrtle Herlitz 1713 72nd Ave. N.
Renewal
Richard E. Gunderson 6109, 11, 13 Beard Ave. N.,
Mike Elnicky &
Robert Tombers 7015 & 7021 Brooklyn Blvd.
Earl James Backer 7018 Brooklyn Blvd.
Voting in favor: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts ,
Kuefler, Fignar, and Lhotka. Voting against: none.
The motion passed unanimously.
The City Manager reported that due to the recently enacted Environmental
Community Health Services Act, Hennepin County is Health Services
attempting to promote environmental health programs
similar to the one the City is involved in jointly with the
cities of Crystal and Brooklyn Park. He stated that the
County is recommending sharing its subsidy, in an
amount of 79� per capita to promote a "seed" effort to
get environmental health service programs going in
communities not providing them.
He reported that a community like Minnetonka, which
has no environmental health program would receive
approximately $27,000 to start up such a program. He
stated that cities like Brooklyn Center with existing
environmental health services are being granted a token
or salve of ll� per capita amounting to $4,202 to Brooklyn
Center. He explained that to receive this subsidy the
City would have to execute an agreement with the County
to continue environmental health services.
Following a brief discussion there was a motion by Action Authorizing
Councilman Kuefler and seconded by Councilman Lhotka the Execution of
to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute an an Agreement
agreement with Hennepin County to continue environ-
mental health services in return for $4,202. Voting in
favor: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar,
and Lhotka. Voting against: none. The motion passed
unanimously.
The City Manager reported that Hilda Boyle, Director of Suburban Health
the Suburban Health Nursing Board, has contacted him Nursing Board
regarding an opening on the Board for an elected official
from the northwest area. He stated that she is urging
an elected official from Brooklyn Center to seek appoint-
ment. A brief discussion ensued relative to the request
with it being the consensus of the Council that such an
appointment be decided by the next City Council meeting.
i
3 -28 -77 -16-
Park and Recreation Councilman Kuefler reported that the Park and
Commission Tour Recreation Commission, in conjunction with its
comprehensive review of all City parks, is planning
a tour of the parks on Saturday, April 2, 1977. He
stated that all City Council members are invited and
that the bus would be leaving the Community Center
at 1:00 p.m.
Adjournment Motion by Councilman Lhotka and seconded by
Councilman Fignar to adjourn the meeting. Voting in
favor: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler,
Fignar, and Lhotka. Voting against: none. The motion
passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council
adjourned at 10 :40 p.m.
Clerk Mayor
-17- 3 -28 -77