Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975 05-19 CCM Regular Session MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION MAY 19, 1975 CITY HALL Call to Order The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Philip Cohen at 7:30 p.m. Roll Call Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Jensen, Fignar, and Kuefler. Also present were City Manager Donald Poss, Director of Public Works fames Merila, Director of Finance Paul Holm1und, Director of Planning and Inspection Blair Tremere, City Attorney Richard Schieffer and Administrative Assistants Ron Warren and James Lacina. Approval of Minutes Motion by Councilman Britts and seconded by Councilman 5-5-75 Fignar to approve the minutes of the May 5, 1975 meeting. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar and Jensen. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Final Plat Approval Motion by Councilman Britts and seconded by Councilman Sellars Addition Jensen to appiuve the final plat of Sellars Addition as submitted. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Council- men Britts, Kuefler, Fignar and Jensen. Voting against. none. The motion passed unanimously. Authorization for The City Manager introduced the next item of business on Obtaining Life the agenda, that of authorization for soliciting group life insurance Quotations insurance quotations. He commented that the specifica- tions provided an option for employees to purchase additional amounts of group life insurance, the premiums to be paid by the empicyee, Following a brief discussion regarding the insurance pro- gram, there was a motion by Councilman Fignar and seconded by Councilman Kuefler to authorize solicitation of group life insurance quotations to be opened on June 17, 1975. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar and Jensen. Voting against: none, The motion passed unanimously, Authorization to The City Manager next recommended that the City Council Execute Contracts authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute contracts for bulk materials awarded April 21 and May 5 0 Motion by Councilman Britts and seconded by Councilman Jensen to authorize the City Manager and Mayor to execute the contracts for bulk materials. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar and Jensen. Voting against: none. The motion passed unani- mously. RESOLUTION Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and NO. 75-91 moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PRO- POSED ALLEY PAVING IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS NO. 1975-1, 1975-2 & 1975-3 -1- 5-19-75 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof; Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar and Robert Jensen; and the following voted against the same® none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.. Member Maurice Britts introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION and moved its adoption- NO. 75 -92 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AND PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR ALLEY PAVING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1975 -4 AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar and Robert Jensen, and the following voted against the same. none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, i Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION and moved its adoption. NO.. 75 -93 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR AMENDATORY IMPROVEMENT PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ALLEY PAVING IMPROVE- MENT PROJECT NO, 1974 -20 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar and Robert Jensen, and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Robert Jensen introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION and moved its adoption-, NO. 75 -94 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET GRADING, BASE & SURFACING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO, 1974 -15, STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1974=35, & ALLEY PAVING IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS NO. 1974 -20, 1975 -1, 2, 3 & 4; AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FORBIDS (CONTRACT 1975 -A) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar and Robert Jensen, and the following voted against the same. none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Maurice Britts introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION and moved its adoption. NO. 75 -95 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENT NOTES 5 -19 -75 -2- The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Robert Jensen, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof - Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, and Robert Jensen; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, Resolution Amending The City Manager next reviewed a resolution recommended 1975 General Fund for the purpose of amending the 1975 General Fund Budget Budget in response to union actions relative to the CETA employees recently hired as laborers in the Street and Park Depart- ments. He noted that despite the fact that CETA employees are temporary and that the CETA program is designed to relieve severe national unemployment problems, Local #49 of the International Union of Operating Engineers has, for its own reasons, opted to exercise its prerogatives and demand laborer wages considerably in excess of the maxi - mum payable by the federal grant program. He stated that the resolution was intended to transfer the CETA employees out of the union bargaining unit into other employment in the Government Buildings Department rather than exercising the other alternative of relegating the employees again to the ranks of unemployed. The of Finance then reviewed the budgetary process. A brief discussion ensued relative to the union's action. Councilman Jensen inquired if other municipalities were experiencing the same problem and the City Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilman Britts inquired as to possibility of federal government intervention to resolve this matter. The City Manager responded that the union was technically within its rights to demand negotiation of higher wages, noting that he wac� not aware of any government authority to remedy the problem. Councilman Kuefler commented that he felt Local #49 has displayed a conflict with the spirit and j_ntent of the emergency employment act. RESOLUTION Mernber Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and NO. 75 -96 ,owed its adoption- RESOLUTION AMENDING 1975 WAGES AND SALARIES AND AMENDING THE 1975 GENERAL FUND BUDGET The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Robert Jensen, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar and Robert Jensen; and the following voted against the same- none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Planning Commission The City Manager introduced the next item of business, Application Nos. 72010 that of consideration of Planning Commission Application and 72069 Nos. 72010 and 72069 submitted by Dietrich Company. He reported that the applicant was seeking amendment to the sit plans and final plat of the previously approved townhouse development. -3- 5 -19 -75 Mayor Cohen briefly reviewed the procedure which the City Council would be following. He stated that the staff would present the application, the Council would comment on this presentation, the applicant would then make his presenta- tion, and following that the public would be invited to comment. He stated that the public hearing would then be closed and that the Council would deliberate on the appli- cation. Administrative Assistant Ron Warren proceeded with a lengthy review of the minutes of the April 24, 1975 meeting of the Planning Commission at which time they considered this application. Following this review the City Manager commented to the Planning Commission action. He suggested that the Planning Commission may have deliberated items that it did not have the authority to consider and that he would point these out to the City Council so that they may be aware of them. He stated that the matter of garages and the specific location and size of them was not an appropriate item before the Planning Commission, single level, double level and story and one -half dwelling units, and especially, the size of dwellings and price ranges were beyond the authority of government to dictate. He .noted that state policy, national policy, and Metropolitan Council policy have declared such governmental dictates tc be exclusionary and negative in their effects on housing opportunities for the nonwealthy. . He further commented that the State Building Code is notably silent in withholding authority to determine number of garages, size of garages and size of dwelling units. He suggested that the City Council's concerns should be directed toward site arrangement and physical layout and those living amenities which .serve the broad public interest. Councilman Fignar inquired as to what these considerations may be. The City Manager noted that such things as setbacks, street pattern, activity levels, living density, subdivision design, open space, lighting, etc, were amenities of appro- priate public interest which shc be considered by the City Council. The Director of Planning and Inspection then proceeded with a review of additional comments and observations at the Planning Commission meeting of April 24, 1975 when the application was first considered. He noted that the amend- ment comprehended no change in the total size of the project or the amount of open space ,nor in the density. He did state, however, that while the size of the blocks remained the same the lots did vary in that the interior lots in the existing blocks would be reduced in size while the end lots would increase in size. He then reviewed the original building plans and the proposed amendment to these initial plans. He pointed out that the proposed amended plans comprehended detached single garages as an option instead of the attached double garages that were proposed under the original application. Mayor Cohen then recognized Mr. john Liptak, representing the Dietrich Company. Mr. Liptak proceeded with a lengthy presentation on the proposed redesign and amendments to the original application. He noted that after a market analysis it I 5 -19 -75 -4- I I was determined that a change in the design and concepts of the existing project were necessary to make the project more salable in the present housing market. He stated that the proposed plans comprehended the use of a very versatile unit onto which many options could be added depending upon the desire of the buyer. An extensive discussion ensued relative to the options and flexibility of the proposed units. Councilman Kuefler inquired as to location of the smaller units. Mr. Liptak responded by noting that they could only be on end units and would be located on the northerly perimeter of the development. He further noted that through his proposal, there would be a maximum of 11 such smaller units. Councilman Britts inquired as to the price of the units as compared to the existing ones. Mr. Liptak responded by noting that the old units range from $42,000 to $46,000 while the new units would range from $34,000 to $42,000. Councilman Kuefler inquired as to the quality of workman- ship of the units. Mr. Liptak noted that there were various options that could be offered in these units which would raise or lower the cost of the units, but that basically the construction quality was the same. Council.—nan, ATI'g - naar briefly commented as to the possible Icso of equity for present owners in the event of allowing con of substantially less quality. Mayor Cohen then opened the meeting up for discussion. He recognized Mr. William Bromfield of 4807 Wingard Lane. Mr. Bromfield stated his concern for a continuation of the provision for two-car garages. He also contended that the placement of the single end units near the rear of the would crowd the open space. Mayor Cohen then recognized Mr. Jerry Warling of 7107 Quail Circle East. Mr. Warling expressed his concern that the concept that was sold to him when he purchased his unit be continued. Mayor Cohen next recognized Mr. Leon Knight of 7109 Perry Avenue North. He stated that existing units would be re in value if the project were not completed. He corn,'mented that he felt the limitation set by the developer on the location of the smaller single story units could be acceptable. Mayor Cohen next recognized the resident of 4805 Wingard Lane. His concern was directed toward the aesthetics and the design concept that was initially sold to the existing property owners. He noted that he did not agree with the flexibility and the appendages that were offered as options. Mayor Cohen next recognized Mrs. Mary Erickson. Mrs, Erickson stated that she was a prospective buyer of a new unit. She commented that she was very much interested in moving into this development and felt the new buildings would not detract from the existing development. -5- 5-19-75 Mayor Cohen next recognized Mr. Leon Knight. Mr. Knight noted that the cheapest unit in this complex would sell for approximately $30,000. He further noted that in order to purchase a house it would take an income of over $14,000, more than the average salary of an Osseo School District teacher, and that he felt this was by no means low- income housing. He theta commented that he felt he could live with the self - limitations established by the developer in the new proposal. Motion by Councilman Fignar and seconded by Councilman Britts to close the public hearing. Voting in favor were: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar and Robert Jensen. Voting against, none. The motion passed unanimously. The City Council recessed at 9,50 p.m. and resumed at Recess 10,15 P.M. Mayor Cohen then commented as to two basic concerns regarding the application. The first being a desire to com- plete the project and the second being the limitations imposed on the developer as to the amendments. A lengthy discussion ensued relative to the application. Councilman Britts inquired as to any legal conflict regarding the original concept as sold to the present owners and the variations and amendments that were now being proposed. The City Attorney noted that the City Council is not legally encumbered to the initial concept of the project. Councilman Jensen expressed a concern that the layout of the plan was not specifically reflective of the Planning Commission action. He contended that there were no appropriate site plans that were presented to act on. Mayor Cohen commented that the plan proposal made by Mr. Liptak would constitute the official site plan for the proJ and that the limitations would be reflected on those playas. A brief discussion ensued relative to the Planning Commission action. The Director of Planning and Inspection suggested that the plan presented to the City Council was in response to the discussion on the application at the April 24, 1975 meeting of the Planning Commission. Councilman Fignar inquired as to the possibility of referring the action back to the Planning Commission for further review. h City Manager recommended against such action because the Planning Commission appeared to defer the entire matter to the Council. He farther commented that the plans as presented by Mr. Liptak set their own thresholds as to develop- ment conditions on location of units. He suggested that it might be appropriate to authorize the staff to in turn authorize exceeding these minimum thresholds as indicated on the pro- posed site and building plan. Councilman Kuefler noted that he could support the proposed site and building plan if there would be contained a clause for the option to upgrade these units, Councilman Britts noting his concern for a commitment to the initial parties, commented that he could not support the pro - posal. Councilman Jensen noted that he could support the proposal only if it were consistent with those conditions apparently agreed upon by the Planning Commission. 5 -19 -75 -6- Councilman Fignar commented that he could sympathize with the present owners but also realized that the value of the proposed units was consistent with the initial sale price of the existing units and that it was important that the project be completed. He noted that he could support the plan as proposed by the developer at this meeting. Mayor Cohen stated that these units were definitely not low-income units and that there was a need to provide available housing in this area and that the project must be completed. A brief discussion then ensued as to the Planning Commission condition regarding the enclosed patio option. It was the consensus of the Council to include this con- dition in the points of approval. After further discussion there was a motion by Councilman Kuefler and seconded by Councilman Fignar to direct the City Manager to draft a resolution approving Application Nos. 72010 and 72069 subject to the following conditions - 1 Building plans are subject to review by the Building Official with respect to the appli- cable codes prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to review by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits and necessary utility line revisions shall be approved by the City Engineer with respect to applicable codes. 3. A performance agreement and a financial guarantee (in a form and amount approved by the City Manager) shall be submitted to assure completion of approved site improvements for the project, prior to the issuance of permits. 4. The site shall be replatted according to the approved plans, and said plat will be subject to the following- a. Review by the City Engineer. b. Requirements of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances, co A copy of any proposed amendments to the Homeowner's Association document shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review. The final plat shall be filed prior to the certification of occupancy for permitted structures. 5. A minimum of two parallel off-street parking stalls shall be provided on the site of each unit. -7- 5-19-75 6. The location of the proposed 11 single level end units shall be as designated on the submitted plans (Blocks 12, 14, 15, 16, 19 and 22).' 7. Enhancements to the proposed single level units shall be subject to approval by the Building Official prior to issuance of building permits. 8. Proposed enclosed patio options shall be limited to Blocks 13, 14, 15 and 16. 9. Landscaping and site improvements shall be evaluated in accordance with the approved landscaping plan and improve - ments in the developed areas shall be completed no later than July 1, 1975, 10. Site lighting for the balance of the project will be compatible in design to the com- pleted portion of the project. Following further discussion there was a vote on the motion. Voting in favor were- Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Fignar and Kuefler. Voting against. Councilmen Jensen and Britts; The motion passed. Mr. Liptak then noted a concern for the July 1 , 1975 date for landscaping. He commented that he would prefer to defer' this work to later in the year when it was more desirable to plant shrubs and trees. Mayor Cohen suggested this matter be referred to the staff for review and recommendation. Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and RESOLUTION moved its adoption. NO. 75-97 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 73 -140 WHICH ESTABLISHED THE BROOKLYN CENTER HOUSING COMMISSION AND DEFINED THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES THEREFOR The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Robert Jensen, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar and Robert Jensen, and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Maurice Britts introduced the following resolution RESOLUTION and moved its adoption- NO. 75 -98 RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING GIFT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar and Robert Jensen; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 5 -19 -75 -8- RESOLUTION Member Maurice Britts introduced the following resolution NO. 75-99 and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION IMPLEMENTING GRIEVANCE ARBITRATION AWARD The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Robert Jensen, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, Maurice Britts, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar and Robert Jensen; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. First Reading The City Manager next recommended the ordinance amend- of Ordinance ing Chapter 12 to the City Council for first reading. He Amending noted that the ordinance reflected those changes approved Chapter 12 by the City Council plus an additional change located in Section 12-317 which represented a housekeeping amend- ment. Mayor Cohen. commented that there were two items which were deferred for further study, those being Section 12-503 and 12-804. Councilman Kuefler inquired as to Section 12-802 noting his concern for controlling density according to numn'Ji of fow - fis regardless of habitable floor space. He recommended this section also for further study. First Reading Motion by Councilman Jensen and seconded by Councilman Fignar to offer for first reading an ordinance amending Chapter 1.2 of the City Ordinances. Voting in favor were, Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar and Jensen. Voting against: none. The motion passed unani- mously. First Reading Motion by Councilman Kuefler and seconded by Councilman of Ordinance Britts to offer for first reading an ordinance Providing for Providing for control of noxious weeds. Voting in favor were: Mayor Control of Cohen, Counclib-nen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar and Jensen. Noxious Weeds Voting ag3inst. none, The motion passed unanimously. CETA and Summer For Council information the City Manager next reviewed Youth Employment a proposal in Congress to provide additional CETA money Plans for ernergency employment. He noted that Hennepin County would be serving as a clearinghouse for this money ter: the municipalities as it did under the first entitlement. He did note, however, that the allocations would be different for this entitlement in that a committee of the Met_ Area Management Association recommended that the entitlement be distributed by dollar amount based on an allocation formula rather than a position amount through political patronage as was done by the first entitlement. The City Manager next reviewed the Federal Summer Youth Employment Program. He noted that along with the , Congressional action creating the CETA positions, there would also be a Federal Summer Youth Program that would last about nine weeks with a focus directed towards dis- advant;a-ed youths. He stated that the Center for Community Action would be handling the recruiting, hiring and administering of the program, and that the municipalities were only required to provide and supervise the work pro- jects. He further noted that the allocation for this program -9- 5-19-75 was also based on a formula devised by the Metropolitan Area Management Association Committee and that the CCA would serve as a clearinghouse similar to Hennepin County for the CETA positions. He did note, however, that unlike CETA these positions were paid totally through the CCA whereas CETA worked on a reimbursement basis to the municipality. The City Manager next reviewed the Governor's Summer Youth Employment Program. He noted that this program is one that the City had participated in last year and that it involved a State grant which the City was required to match in the amount of 25 %. He commented that the target areas for this program were both disadvantaged and nondisadvan- taged youth. Mayor Cohen left the table at 11:35 p.m. and returned at 11:40 p.m. The City Manager next noted that the Jaycees had applied License - Jaycees for a temporary on -sale nonintoxicating beer license for the Temporary On -Sale upcoming carnival. He noted that the site of the carnival Nonintoxicating this year would be the Brookdale parking lot near County Beer License Road 10 and Shingle Creek. He further commented that Brookdale Center management expressed apprehension regarding this site and the sale of beer and consequently, recommended that beer consumption be limited to the area of the beer tent and that at least two off -duty police officers be employed during hours which beer is sold. A brief discussion ensued relative to the Iicense. Council- man Fignar inquired as to the problem of walk -ons with beer. The City Manager noted that this would be a problem and that there was relatively little that could be done about it. Councilman Kuefler inquired as to the off -duty patrol officers and whether this requirement might nullify the intent of the carnival in making money. The City Manager responded by noting that the carnival had used off -duty police officers in the past, and that the recommendation formalized practice of previous years. Motion by Councilman Jensen and seconded by Councilman Kuefler to approve the Jaycees temporary on -sale nonintoxi- eating beer license subject to the following conditions: 1 . Beer consumption shall be limited to the area of the beer tent. 2. At least two off -duty police officers shall be retained during the hours of the sale of beer. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar and Jensen. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Motion by Councilman Kuefler and seconded by Councilman Licenses Britts to approve the following licenses. 5 -19 -75 -10- BINGO LICENSE Jaycees 5313 - 68th Ave. N. COMMERCIAL KENNEL LICENSE Brookdale Pet Center Brookdale Brooklyn Pet Hospital 4902 France Avenue N. K-Mart 5930 Earle Brown Dr. Shopper's City 3600 - 63rd Ave. N. Woolworths Brookdale FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE Olive's East Brookdale ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE Mrs. Taycees 5313 - 68th Ave. N. Stanley Shows (7 stands) Hot Springs, Arkansas MOTOR VEH ICLE DEALER'S CLASS A LICENSE Brooklyn Blvd. Chrysler- Ply mouth 6121 Brooklyn Blvd. MOTOR VEHICLE DEALER'S CLASS B LICENSE Zec-G-ae PDNA!er Sports, Inc. 4321 - 68th Ave. N. SIGN HANGER'S LICENSE Sir .cra 'via GjULLUJU Dizplay No. 13 - 77th Way N.E. SWIMMING POOL LICENSE Columbus Village Apts. 507 - 70th Ave. N. Holiday T 1501 - 65th Ave. N. Mary 'Garden Townhouses 4703 - 68th Ave. N. Twin Lake North Apts. 4536 - 58th Ave. N. TEMPORAR77 ON-SALE NONINTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE ja Y C e �L" 7, 5313 - 68th Ave. N. Voting "i.n. Fav,-.)r were, Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, KueflInr, Fignar and jemsen. Voting against, none. The rriot.lcn unakilmously. Parking on The Manager next brought up the boulevard parking Boulevard prc for consideration© He reviewed a series of slides oftil-le se theast neighborhood which illustrated the prob- le m and the street deterioration which was directly related L . 0 0 M57 Cohen, then commented that he felt there was a need fer a projoct '17o restore these certain boulevards similar to what was done after utilities were installed in other streets. He Etated his concern that a solution be found for this P r o A ler- discussion ensued relative to the parking on boulevard problem and street parking relative to the ordinance violations. The City Manager noted that it was City policy not to tag for street parking during the summer months. He suggested that perhaps the ordinance should be changed to reflect this policy. Mayor Cohen requested the City Manager to do further research on the boulevard parking problem and present alternatives to the Council along with possibility of amending the street parking ordinance. 5-19-75 Motion by Councilman Britts and seconded by Councilman Adjournment Kuefler to adjourn the meeting. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Britts, Kuefler, Fignar and n n n Dense o Voting against: st: nonea The motion passed una ni- g g P mously. m The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 12 :30 a.m. �f Clerk Mayor 5 -19 -75 -12-