HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972 09-25 CCM Regular Session Minutes of the Proceedings of the City
Council of the City of Brooklyn Center
In the County of Hennepin and State of
Minnesota
September 25, 1972
The City Council met in regular session and was called to order by
Mayor Philip Cohen at 7:35 P.M.
Roll Call: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts.
Also present were: City Manager Donald Pass,, Director of Public Works James
Merila, Director of Finance Paul Holmlund, City Attorney Richard Schieffer
Chief of Police Thomas O'Hehir and Administrative Assistants Daniel Hartman
and Blair Tremere.
The invocation was offered by Reverend Lynch of Brooklyn Center
Baptist Church.
Motion by Councilman Leary and seconded by Councilman Britts
to approve the minutes of the September 11, 1972 meeting as submitted. Voting
in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts. Voting
against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Heck and seconded by Councilman Ausen to approve
the minutes of the September 12, 1972 meeting as submitted. Voting in favor
were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts. Voting against:
none. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Manager explained that pursuant to informal authority
Brooklyn Center has filed as a plaintiff in an anti -trust action against certain
Minnesota liquor wholesalers and their trade association, the Wine and Spirits
Institute. He stated that law suit seeks to recover treble damages and a pro-
h1hition against further violation of anti -trust laws.
A discussion ensued relative to the possible cost ramifications of the
suit, and the City Manager explained that the only cost to the participating
communities would be certain required fees such as filing fees and that any
other expenditures would require prior approval by the participating City Councils..
He stated the law firm which had been contracted to conduct the suit had agreed
to base their fee upon awards which might be made.
Following further discussion there was a motion by Councilman Heck and
seconded by Councilman Ausen to formally authorize the participation of the
City of Brooklyn Center in the anti -trust law suit action against certain Minnesota
liquor wholesalers and their trade association, the Wine and Spirits Institute.
Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Leary and Britts.
Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Manager next explained that the Council had earlier authorized
the conduct of negotiations possibly leading to the sale of land underlying the
former City library. He said the staff and the Hennepin County Library
Administration had each secured an independent appraisal and had negotiated
a tentative sale price of $34,745 on the basis of such appraisals. He further
explained that the land comprised 1.47 acres.
Councilman Ausen commented regarding the cost of the land as it
related to other residential property values.
In response to a question by Councilman Britts, the City Manager stated
that as provided by Charter, the funds realized from the sale must be utilized
to reduce outstanding debt on the property or to reduce debt on similar properties.
-1- '
Following further discussion there was a motion by Councilman Leary
and seconded by Councilman Heck to authorize the Mayor and City Manager
to proceed with the sale of the land underlying the former City library at a
negotiated price of $34, 745.00 noting that independent appraisals were made
of this property.
In further discussion Mayor Cohen stated that research should be
done as to the use of the money realized from the sale of the land, and the
City Manager responded that this would be done in conjunction with the procedure
required by the Charter stipulating that the sale must be approved via ordinance
adoption.
The Mayor then called for a vote. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen,
Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts. Voting against: none. Motion
carried unanimously.
Mayor Cohen announced that the Council would commence with public
hearings and review of special assessments covering 1970 and 1971 projects.
The Clerk produced an affidavit of publication of notice of hearing on
the review of the special assessments showing two weeks' publication thereof
in the official newspaper, the last publication being on September 7, 1972,
which affidavit was examined and found satisfactory and ordered placed on file.
Motion by Councilman Heck and seconded by Councilman Britts to
close the assessment hearing on Water Main Improvement Project No. 1971 -18.
Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts
Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Leary and seconded by Councilman Britts to
close the assessment hearing on Street Restoration Improvement Project No. 1971 -19.
Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts.
Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Ausen and seconded by Councilman Britts to close
the assessment hearing on Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project No. 1971 -13.
Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts.
Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Britts and seconded by Councilman Heck to close
the assessment hearing on Water Main Improvement Project No. 1971 -14. Voting
in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts. Voting
against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Heck and seconded by Councilman Leary to close
the assessment hearing on Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project No. 1971 -1.6.
Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts.
Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Leary and seconded by Councilman Britts to close
the assessment hearing on Water Main Improvement Project No. 1971 -17. Voting
in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts. Voting
against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Ausen and seconded by Councilman Britts to close
the assessment hearing on Street Surfacing Improvement Project No. 1971 -2.
Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts.
Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Leary and seconded by Councilman Heck to close
the assessment hearing on Curb & Gutter Improvement Project No. 1969 -38,
Curb & Gutter Improvement Project No. 1969 -52, Base & Surfacing Improvement
Project No. 1970 -20, Grading, Base & Surfacing Improvement Project No. 1971 -5,
Curb & Gutter Improvement Project No. 1971 -6, Base, Surfacing & Sidewalk
Improvement Project No. 1971 -8, Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project No. 1971 -20,
Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 1971 -21, Water Main Improvement Project
No. 1971 -22, Curb & Gutter Improvement Project No. 1969 -57, Grading, Base &
.Surfacing Improvement Project No. 1970 -13, Curb & Gutter Improvement Project
-2-
No. 1970 -14, Grading, Base & Surfacing Improvement Project No. 1970 -15,
Curb & Gutter Improvement Project No. 1970 -16, Base, Surfacing & Sidewalk
Improvement Project No. 1970 -19, Base & Surfacing Improvement Project
No. 1971 -4, and Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Improvement Project No. 1971 -7.
Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts
Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Heck and seconded by Councilman Britts to close
the assessment hearing on Public Utilities Water Hookups, Public Utilities
Water Revenue, and Sewer Connections. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen,
Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts. Voting against: none. Motion
carried unanimously.
Member John Leary introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 72 -166
RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR WATER MAIN
IMPROVEMENT NO'S. 1971 -14, 1971 -17, 1971 -18, AND 1 971 -22;
AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO'S. 1971 -13, 1971 -16 AND
1971 -20; AND STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMENT NO. 1971 -2;
AND STREET RESTORATION NO. 1971 -19; AND STREET BASE AND
SURFACING IMPROVEMENT NO'S. 1 970 -20 AND 1971 -4; AND
STREET BASE, SURFACING AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO'S.
1970 -19 AND 1971 -8; AND STREET GRADING, BASE AND SURFACING
IMPROVEMENT NO'S. 1970 -13, 1970 -15 AND 1971 -5; AND CURBAND
GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO'S. 1969 -38, 1969 -52, 1969 -57,
1970 -14, 1970 -16, AND 1971 -6; AND CURB, GUTTER AND SIDE -
WALK IMPROVEMENT NO'S. 1971 -7; AND STORM SEWER
IMPROVEMENT NO. 1971 -21; AND PUBLIC UTILITIES WATER HOOKUPS;
AND _PUBL UTILIT WATER REVE�j 72; AN W ER CONNECTIONS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Howard Heck, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, John Leary, Vernon Ausen, Howard Heck and
Maurice Britts; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon
said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member Vernon Ausen introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 72 -167
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT SEWER SERVICE ACCOUNTS
FOR 1971 TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Maurice Britts, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, John Leary, Vernon Ausen, Howard Heck and
Maurice Britts; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon
said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member Howard Heck introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 72 -168
RESOLUTION APPROVING CLASSIFICATION LIST "646 -C"
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member John Leary, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, John Leary, Vernon Ausen, Howard Heck and
Maurice Britts; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon
said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
-3-
Member Maurice Britts introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 72 -169
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CERTAIN TAX FORFEITED LAND IN THE
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO BE USED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Vernon Ausen, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, John Leary, Vernon Ausen, Howard Heck and
Maurice Britts; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon
said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Regarding Planning Commission Applications No. 72018 and No. 72041
submitted by R.W. Steiner, the City Manager noted that the applicant had requested
that the ooulderation of the applications be deferred until the next meeting.
Following a brief discussion there was a motion by Councilman Britts
and seconded by Councilman Heck to defer consideration of Planning Commission
Applications No. 72018 and No. 72041 submitted by R.W. Steiner until the
October 2, 1972 Council meeting. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen,
Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts. Voting against: none. Motion
carried unanimously.
The City Manager next discussed Planning Commission Application
No. 72069 submitted by the Dietrich Co. He stated that the applicant was
seeking approval of a preliminary plat for the Creek Villa townhouse development.
He explained that the Planning Commission had recommended that the final plat
should indicate the dedication of a narrow parcel lying northwesterly of the
Brooklyn Blvd. entrance for purposes of a planned right turn lane. The Director
of Public Works briefly commented relative to the layout of the proposed plat
acid the need for the right turn lane.
The Mayor recognized Mr. Warren Olson who represented the
applicant and a brief discussion ensued.
Motion by Councilman Britts and seconded by Councilman Heck to
approve Planning Commission Application No. 72069 submitted by the Dietrich
Co. subject to the following conditions: `
�
1. The final plat shall be subject to the requirements of
the Platting Ordinance;
2. The final plat shall be subject to review by the
City Engineer;
3 The final plat shall indicate the dedication of a narrow parcel
northwesterly of the Brooklyn Blvd. entrance for a planned
right turn lane to be constructed by the State Highway Department.
Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts.
Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Manager next explained Planning Commission Application
No. 72063 submitted by Brooklyn Center Industrial, Inc. He stated the applicant
was seeking rezoning of a parcel of land located easterly of Xerxes Avenue North
and northerly of F.A.I. 94 , from I -1 to C-2, to permit the construction of a
restaurant development. He stated that the parcel and surrounding land (except
the Shingle Creek greenstrip) are a part of the Brooklyn Center Industrial Park,
which is currently zoned I -1. He noted the area comprehended by the proposal
was 6.48 acres.
He further stated that earlier conceptual plans submitted by the
applicant. had indicated the eventual construction of several restaurants
in the complex.
-4-
The Director of Public Works then commented relative to the proposed
construction of a freeway boulevard northerly of F.A.I. 94 as well as the current
and planned provisions for utilities in the vicinity of the proposed rezoning.
An extensive discussion ensued relative to the possible future develop-
ment of the entire area northerly of the freeway, the "spot zoning" implications
of the proposed rezoning, and the possibility of the establishment of a "freeway
zone" concept which would comprehend a mixture of industrial and commercial
uses.
Councilman Ausen noted his concern with the future access provisions
to the area, particularly in light of the elimination of the Xerxes Avenue off ramps.
Councilman Heck inquired relative to the special assessment risks
which would be realized due to the necessary development of roadway and
utilties in the area to service the subject proposal. The City Manager responded
that the staff had considered the special assessment risk, and that the site
Originally proposed for rezoning by the applicant had been changed to the present
site because of the proximity of roadway access and utilities.
Councilman Ausen voiced his concern that since uses other than
restaurants could be established in a C -2 zone, specifically retail outlets
such as shopping centers, there may be undesirable ramifications upon. other
nearby commercially zoned areas. In that regard, further extensive discussion
ensued regarding the possible development. of a "freeway zone "concept.
Mayor Cohen commented that since the applicant had previously
Promoted the concept, the Council should give consideration to the adoption
of an ordinance vehicle which would comprehend a freeway zone. Administrative
Assistant Blair Tremere noted that the applicant had recently submitted another
application requesting - - rezouin"t the property lying directly east of the subject
Parcel, from I -1 to C-2.
Following further extensive discussion1here was a motion by Councilman
Heck and seconded by Councilman Leary to approve Kanning Commission
Application loo. 72063 submitted by B. C. I. P. , Inc.
Councilman Ausen re- stated his concern relative to the desirability
of the location and the possible ramifications of creating a purely commercial
zone along the freeway.
Councilman Britts stated that this was his concern as well and that
further consideration might be given to a mixture of uses along the freeway,
Councilman Leary explained that he was somewhat reluctant to move
on the application, since there were considerations of the development of the
entire area with commercial uses, and he noted his concern that proper access
be provided for all potential tenants., noting -that-the- specific- oommercial uses
could vary substantially.
The Mayor then called for a vote. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen,
Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts. Voting against: none. Motion
carried unanimously.
The City Manager then suggested that the Council's reluctance might
Justify renewing consideration of a possible "freeway zone". He stated that
Possibly consideration could be given to a planned commercial zone, developed
along the lines of the proposed planned residential development ordinance
amendment, wherein the freeway district could be comprehended as a special
use in the I -1 zone.
Councilman Ausen agreed that the Planning Commission should be
asked to consider a planned commercial development special use Ito-ba-Vatterned-
after the planned residential developer ►mot - ordinanc"meadment.
Councilman Britts agreed, stating that the Council's reluctance to
approve the rezoning of various parcels from I -1 to C -2 should be noted
to the Commission.
Mayor Cohen stated that possibly a joint meeting should be arranged
for purposes of considering the concept of such a district.
With reference to the action taken regarding Planning Commission
Application No. 72063 submitted by B. C. I. P. Inc. an extensive discussion
ensued relative to holding that rezoning action in abeyance until a determination
was made relative to development of a more flexible zoning device.
Motion by Councilman Leary and seconded by Councilman Britts
to reconsider Planning Commission Application No. 72063 submitted by
B.C.I. P. , Inc. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen,
Heck and Britts Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Following a brief discussion there was a motion by Councilman Britts
and seconded by Councilman Ausen to table Planning Commission Application
No. 72063 submitted by B.C.I.P., Inc. to permit review of a freeway zoning
concept.
In further discussion Councilman Heck noted that the particular developer
had originally requested consideration of such a freeway concept, and that
action on such a proposal had been deferred indefinitely. He stated that, in his
opinion, reconsideration of the concept should be undertaken and completed
promptly.
Councilman Ausen agreed and noted that the Council had earlier rejected
a proposed ordinance because of concern at the time of the effect of signery and
the Sign Ordinance
The Mayor then called for a vote. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen,
Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts. Voting against: none. Motion
carried unanirnously.`7
The meeting recessed at 9:35,P.M. and resumed at 10:10 P.M.
The City Manager explained that all subdivision obligations pertaining
to the Edling Third Addition have been completed and recommended that the
subdivision bond in the amount of $770.00 posted by Lundstrom Construction
Company be released.
Motion by Councilman Leary and seconded by Councilman Ausen to
authorize the release of the subdivision bond in the amount of $770.00 posted
by Lundstrom Construction Company for improvements in the Ediing Third
Addition. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck
and Britts. Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Manager presented a draft resolution which recommended the
rejection of bids for bituminous paving Contract 1972 -C. He explained that
the bids had been determined excessive and that other arrangements were being
made to complete the necessary work.
The Director of Public Works further commented relative to the subject
project and stated that he was in the process of negotiating a possible bituminous
paving of the subject. roadways.
In response to a question from Councilman Heck, the City Manager stated
that under Charter provisions such a contract could be negotiated since the
dollar amount was within the $5,000 limitation.
Member Maurice Britts introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 72 -170
RESOLUTION REJECTING BIDS FOR BROOKLYN CENTER CONTRACT
1 97
-6-
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Howard Heck, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, John Leary, Vernon Ausen, Howard Heck and
Maurice Britts; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member John Leary introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 72 -171
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTATION FOR BITUMINOUS STREET
SURFACING OF BRYANT AVENUE NORTH AND COLFAX AVENUE
NORTH FROM 69TH AVENUE NORTH TO APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET
SOUTH (STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 19711.5)
The motion for the adoption of the foregdhg resolution was duly seconded by
member Maurice Britts, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, John Leary, Vernon Ausen, Howard Heck and
Maurice Britts; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon
said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member John Leary introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 72 -172
RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ROBBINSDALE
RELATIVE TO PROVIDING UTILITY SERVICE TO ROBBINSDALE
RESIDENTS ON FRANCE AVENUE NORTH FROM THE BROOKLYN
CENTER CORPORATE LIMITS TO APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET
SOUTHERLY THEREOF
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Howard Heck, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, John Leary, Vernon Ausen, Howard Heck and
Maurice Britts; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon
said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member Vernon Ausen introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 72 -173
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK (CONTRACTED BY CITY)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Maurice Britts, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, John Leary, Vernon Ausen, Howard Heck and
Maurice Britts; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon
said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member Maurice Britts introduced the following ordinance and moved
its adoption:
ORDINANCE NO. 72 -16
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 TO PROVIDE FOR
ACCESSORY OFF - STREET PARKING IN BUSINESS DISTRICTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS;
Section 1: Section 35 -320 of the City Ordinances is hereby amended
by the addition of the following:
-7-
3 . Special Uses,
La) Accessory off -site narking not located on the same fro
with the Principal use , sub, j�ect to the provisions of
Section 35 -701,
Section 2: Section 35 -321 of the City Ordinances is hereby amended
by the addition of the following:
3. Special Uses.
ka_.) Accessory off - site Parking not located on the same property
with the principal use, sub, ject to the provisions of
Section 35-701,
Section 3: Section 35 -322 of the City Ordinances is hereby amended
by the addition of the following:
3. Special Uses,
lc) Accessory off -site Parking not located on the same property
with the Principal use, „subject to the Provisions of
Section 35 -701.
Section 4: Section 35 -330 of the City Ordinances is hereby amended
by the addition of the following:
3_. Special Uses.
fie) Accessory off -site Parking not located on the same property
with the principal use subject to the provisions of
Section 35 -701,
Section 5: Section 35 -331 of the City Ordinances is hereby amended
by the addition of the following:
3. _Sp ecial Uses.
c A esso o f -s t kin not located on the same ro
with fihe princiP use subie_ct to the provisions of
Section 35 -701,
Section 6: Section 35 -701, subdivision 3, is hereby amended to
read as follows:
3. Spaces accessory to uses located in a business or industrial
district shall l be on the same lot as the uses served unless a special use permit
authorizes su2Plemental accessory of� f-site Parkngnot located on the same
P roperty with the n rinciv al use. Sec al use 2ermits auth rizing s ch 2§rkin
may be issued subiect to the following conditions
(a) Special use Permits may be issued only for business or
industrial uses which have been continuously operational
on a specific site for at least two years.
(b) Accessory off-site parking shall be Remitted only on
Properties located in districts zoned commercial (Cl ,� ClA ,
CJ and industrial (Il , I2) and having the he same or less
restrictive zoning classification as the Principal use,
(c) Accessory off -site parking shall be limited to one site
Per each business or industrial use issued a special
use permit.
(d) The distance from the furthest point of the accessory off site
Parking property to the site of the principal use shall not
exceed 300 feet.
(e) A minimum of 20 Parking spaces must be provided on the
off -site parking pronertz.
(f) Accessory off -site Parking shall be located such that pedestrian
traffic will not be reguired to cross the following roadways to
reach the principal use:
-8-
(1), Maier thoro„uchfares as defined in Section 35 -9001
(2) 55th and 56th Avenues North between Xerxes Avenue
and Brooklyn Boulevard:
L3) Summit Drive;
(4) 66th Avenue North between Lyndale Avenue ,North_ and
Camden Avenue North,
(g) Accessory off -site parkin spaces maybe credited to the
parking requirements of the printpal use if th2 off-site
Parking, Property is legally encumber ed to the sole purpose
Of Rrovidina Parking accessory to the principal use.
(h) Accessory gfff -site Parking site improvements shall be_
provided as required by the City Council.
Section 7: This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and
thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by
member Vernon Ausen, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Philip Cohen, John Leary, Vernon Ausen, Howard Heck and
Maurice Britts; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon
said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
The City Manager recommended a draft ordinance for the purpose of
implementing the recently successful referendum authorizing issuance of Sunday
liquor licenses.
Following a brief discussion Counciaman Britts moved and Councilman Heck
seconded the first reading of the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO LICENSING AND REGULATING THE
SUNDAY SALE OF INTQMCATING LIQUOR
Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts.
Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Leary and seconded by Councilman Ausen
to approve the following licenses:
Bulk Vendor License
K -Mart (S.S. Kresge) 5930 Earle Brown Drive
Food Establishment License
Peking Eating Place 5704 Logan Avenue North
Garbage and Refuse Hauling License
Alter Trucking & Terminal 2333 Rockingham Road
Dan's Disposal Route 1, Cedar, Minn.
Maroney's Trucking, Inc. Route 3, Box 30A
McKnight Trucking, Inc. 424 South Concord
Waste Control, Inc. 444 Atwater Street
Gas Piping License
3 -D Heating 6532 West Lake Street
Gas Supply, Inc. 2238 Edgewood Ave. So.
Larson Mac Co. 7811 Golden Valley Road
Heating and Air Conditioning License
3 -D Heating 6532 West Lake Street
Larson Mac Co. 7811 Golden Valley Road
Housemovers_ License
Ernst Housemovers 85th & Co;. Rd. 18
-9-
Non - Perishable Food Vendor License
K -Mart (S. S. Kresge) 5930 Earle Brown Drive
Sian Hanger's License
Signcrafter's Outdoor Display #13 - 77th Way N.E.
Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts.
Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Councilman Heck and seconded by Councilman Britts
to reconvene the 1973 budget hearing. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen,
Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts. Voting against: none. Motion
carried unanimously.
Mayor Cohen noted a letter dated September 25, 1972 which he submitted
to the Council amplifying his remarks which appeared in a Brooklyn Center Post
news article the previous week, relative to the provisions and ramifications of
the Omnibus Tax Law levy limitations.
The City Manager then proceeded to review the various departmental
budget statements and recommendations including those accounts for the
Mayor and Council, Elections, Administrative Office, and the Office of the
Assessor. A brief discussion ensued relative to the recommendations for the
Assessor's Office, as well as the personnel structure of that department.
The City Manager further reviewed the recommendations for the
Finance Department and an extensive discussion ensued relative to the ram-
ifications of the LOGIS program. Also reviewed were the recommendations -for
the Independent Audit, Legal Services, Charter Commission, Government Buildings,
and the Police Department.
A discussion ensued relative to the maintenance and acquisition of
Patrol cars for the Police Department as well as various administrative innovations
which had been established in the department over the past year.
Regarding the account for Fire Protection, the City Manager noted
certain corrections of the Personal Services section of the proposed budget,
namely the recommended monthly salaries for the Assistant Chief should read
$120.00, for the Deputy Fire Marshal, $50.00, and for the Drill Master, $90.00.
Further discussion ensued relative to the requests and the recommendations br
the Fire Protection Account.
Also reviewed were the accounts for Protective Inspection, Civil Defense,
Animal Control, and the Engineering Department. Regarding Civil Defense,
the City Manager briefly explained he intends to recommend restructuring the
Civil Defense function.
Motion by Councilman Leary and seconded by Councilman Britts to
adjourn the 1973 proposed budget hearing until 7 :30 P.M., September 27, 1972.
Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts.
Voting against: none. Motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Ausen stated that the Council should recognize the need
for a definite interpretation of the Omnibus Tax Law regarding the establishment
of the base year for determining the tax levy limitations.
Following a brief discussion there was a motion by Councilman Britts
and seconded by Council Heck to adjourn the meeting. Voting in favor were:
Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Britts. Voting against: none.
Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 12:15 A. M.
Clerk Mayor
-10-