HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971 10-04 CCM Regular Session Minutes of the Proceedings of the City
Council of the City of Brooklyn Center
In the County of Hennepin and State of
Minnesota
October 4, 1971
The City Council met in regular session and was called to order by
Mayor Cohen at 6:40 P. M.
Roll Call: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Willard.
Also present were: City Manager Donald Poss, Director of Finance Paul Holmlund,
Director of Public Works James Merila, City Attorney Richard Schieffer, Chief of '
Police Thomas O'Hehir, Administrative Assistants Tom Loucks and Blair Tremere.
Reverend Amos Levang of Brooklyn Center Assemblies of God Church
offered the invocation.
Motion by Councilman Heck and seconded by Councilman Leary to
t
reconvene the 1972 budget hearings. Voting .n favor were: Mayor Cohen,,
g Yo he .
Councilmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Willard. Voting against: none. Motion
carried unanimously.
The City Manager proceeded with a review of the recommended appro-
priations for the Park and Recreation Department. It was suggested that the
matter of purchasing a piano for the Community Center social hall, which had
been earlier deleted from the budget, might be reconsidered.
After a brief discussion of the need and costs of a new piano it was
the consensus of the Council that the proposed purchase of a piano in the amount
of $900 should remain in the budget.
The City Manager responded to various inquiries regarding the Park and
Recreation Department budget and recommended the addition of $2,040.00 to the
Capital Outlay Account No. 475 -53 to purchase seventeen trash containers for
the City parks thereby enabling commercial trash collection at a savings of
an estimated 768 elan hours of park employee time. Relative thereto the Council
concluded to delete the recommended 3/4 ton pickup truck and a mobile radio
from the budget.
The meeting recessed at 8 :10 P.M. and resumed at 8:30 P.M.
The City Manager stated that the 1972 budget proposal for the independent
audit reflected the anticipated cost of the audit activity during the ear involving
tY g year,, g
all accounts except '&,a Fire Relief Association and the Public Utilities.
He commented that the anticipated expenditures for legal services
remains at the approximate level of the 1971 appropriations and that the
recommended $1500 for the Charter Commission was required by statute,
i
The City Manager stated that the government buildings account has
been greatly influenced by the recent capital projects program to the extent
that it reflects the custodial costs of maintaining the new facilities and the
Increased utility costs for electricity and heating.
l
A brief discussion ensued with regard to various items concerning
the maintenance of the new buildings.
The City Manager next reviewed the police protection portion of the
proposed budget. He noted that the proposal comprehends no additional full -time
positions. He further stated that it was intended to deploy present manpower
in such a manner that an additional squad will be assigned patrol duties during
the middle watch and the dogwatch shifts. He explained that in order to accom-
plish this it is recommended an additional black and white squad car be acquired
and outfitted. This would result in five squad cars being on duty during the
two shifts during the majority of the work year.
_1_
The City Manager commented that because the 1971 police squad cars
were late in arriving and thus would not be in service for a complete year prior
to the County bids for 1972 models, it was intended to experiment by running
the cars an extended period of time through 1972. As a consequence approximately
$800 per car had been recommended as in incremental increase in the Street
Department vehicle maintenance and repair budget.
With regard to proposed manpower requirements the City Manager
recommended the establishment of another juvenile officer assignee position
and noted the deletion of a lieutenancy. A general discuss ion ensued regarding
various aspects of the Police Department operation and training program and
regarding various items of capital outlay.
The City Manager next reviewed the fire protection portion of the budget.
He noted the 1972 proposal recommends no change in the manpower complement
except for some station duty expansion on Saturday watches. He commented that
certain items of specialized fire fighting equipment are recommended in the proposal
thereby contributing to the department's reputation as being one of the finest
equipped fire departments in the suburban area. He said that in addition to the
operating appropriations, the sum of $34,,496 was included for 1972 actuarial
funding of the Fire Relief Association Pension Fund.
Mayor Cohen left the Council Chamber at 9:50 P. M. and handed
the gavel to Mayor Pro -tem Howard Heck.
A brief discussion ensued concerning emergency response time of the
Brooklyn Center Fire Department, it being suggested that with the use of the
proposed radio and telephone recording equipment the actual response time could
be included in the regular Fire Chief s report to the Council,
Mayor Cohen returned to the meeting at 10:00 P.M.
Following a review of the recommended appropriations for Protective
Inspection, a discussion ensued concerning the recently passed state law regarding
a state building code and the ramifications for inspection activities at the local
level.
Motion by Councilman Leary and seconded by Councilman Heck to
adjourn the budget hearing. Voting in favor were: Mayor Cohen, Councilmen
Leary, Ausen, Heck and Willard. Voting against: none. Motion carried
unanimously.
The next item on the agenda was a continuation of deliberations regarding
the proposed ice facility. The City MVianager presented a resolution previously
requested by the Council which would put the matter of a ice arena bond issue
before the voters on November 2nd.
A discussion ensued relative to uses of such a facility other than ice
skating as well as the various cost factors of a multi -use facility. Councilman
Heck suggested the Council should consider further study of the matter, thus
not having the bond referendum put before the voters on November 2nd. The Mayor
recognized Mr. Ron Giddings, the President of the Brooklyn Center Hockey
Association, and asked Mr. Giddings to comment. Mr. Giddings said that the
Hockey Association had recently considered the possibility of postponing a final
decision on the ice facility issue for approximately thirty days to permit further
study. He stated that the Hockey Association realizes the validity of a proposed
multi -use facility as well as the possible need for further public hearings on the
proposal.
A lengthy discussion ensued concerning various design possibilities
and related cost differentials, and further discussion was generated relative
to whether an ice facility would be used for six months or would feature a
multi -use capability for 12 month utilization,
Mayor Cohen stated that a substantial amount of data was already
available to the Council and he questioned whether delaying the decision on
the bond issue for purposes of further study would produce new data and soiutica s.
He commented that if the decision, and thus the referendum, were delayed, the
Council should set a specific date for a special election, such as December 7,
1971, and assure that deliberations were completed and a decision made within
thirty days so that the referendum could in fact be held on that date.
Mayor Cohen recognized Mr. Leon Binger and Mir. Tony Kuefler who
reiterated their position that there was a substantial cost differentiation between
a six month ice facility and a twelve month multi -use facility and thus, further
study was merited to determine which of those should be proposed to the voters,
Mrs. Delores Hastings, President of the League of Women. Voters in Brooklyn
Center, said she had talked with many residents who had opposed a City operated
ice hockey facility. She stated that there was a need for thorough discussion
of several alternative facilities to avoid the impression that the Council had
made a hasty decision with regard to one particular type of facility.
The City Manager noted that if the Council were going to consider
additional alternatives they would have to assure that they were considering
viable alternatives. He stated that this, in effect, would require that an entire
new program proposal be developed during the suggested thirty day postponement
period. A brief discussion ensued concerning the procedure which could be +
following to develop new alternatives.
Notion by Councilman Leary and seconded by Councilman Willard to
table consideration of the proposed ice arena until the October 18, 1971 Council
meeting. Voting in favor were: Councilmen Leary, Heck, Ausen and Willard.
Voting against: Mayor Cohen. Motion carried.
Councilman Leary moved to reconvene the 1972 budget hearings. The
motion failed for lack of a second.
Notion by Councilman Willard and seconded by Councilman Heck
to adjourn n the meeting until October 5, 1971 at 800 P. M. .Voting in favor were:
Mayor Cohen, Counc ±lmen Leary, Ausen, Heck and Willard. Voting against: none,
IV otion carried unanimously, The Council meeting adjourned at 1 :00 A. M.
ClerkiUlayor
3
i
-3-