The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987 01-12 CCP Regular Session 130 Co r , y CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER JANUARY 12, 1987 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Employee Service Recognition Program -This is the eighth annual presentation by the City Council of service awards to City employees to recognize years of service to the City. 5. Adjourn n 1986 Council 6. Administer Oath of Office 7. Call to Order 1987 Council 8. Roll Call 1987 Council 9. Open Forum 10. Select Mayor Pro tem 11. Approval _ pP of Consent Agenda All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. 12. Approval of Minutes - December 22, 1986 - Regular Session 13. Mayoral Appointments: *a. Human Rights Commission *b. Park & Recreation Commission *c. Northwest Hennepin Human Services Advisory Commission *d. Weed Inspector - Brad Hoffman *14. Designate Official Newspaper - Brooklyn Center Post 15. Resolutions: *a. Designating Depositories for City Funds *b. Designating Representative and Alternate Representative to the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 40 *c. Regarding Mayor Nyquist's 1987 Salary CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- January 12, 1987 d. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation for the Dedicated Public Service of Allan D. Braun *e. Requesting Transfer of Title for One Parcel of Tax - Forfeited Land on Appraisal List 553 -A to the City of Brooklyn Center -This resolution covers the right -of -way for Earle Brown Drive between John Martin Drive and Summit Drive. f. Approving Plans and Specifications for Earle Brown Farm Tax Increment District Phase III Streetscape Improvements (Improvement Project No. 1986 -21, Contracts 1986 -Q, 1986 -R and 1986 -S) -This is the major phase of construction of the Streetscape Improvements within the Tax Increment District. Staff will be prepared to review this project and cost estimates in detail at the Council meeting. *g. Establishing Improvement Project No. 1987 -01, Reconditioning of Wells No. 4 and 9, Accepting Proposal and Approving Contract Therefor -Well No. 4 is located just south of Evergreen School. Well No. 9 is the City's newest well, located between Camden Avenue North and T.H. 252, near 72nd Avenue. *h. Establishing Improvement Project No. 1987 -02, Reconditioning of Water Tower No. 1, and Approving Agreement for Professional Services Relating Thereto -This water tower is located at 69th Avenue and France Avenue. It is recommended that the outside of this tower be reconditioned and repainted. i. Establishing Improvement Project No. 1987 -03, Installation of a Water Main from Lions Park to the Intersection of County Road 10 and Shingle Creek Parkway, Ordering Preparation of a Report Thereon, and Approving Agreement for Professional Services to Conduct a Soils Investigation Relating Thereto -It is recommended that this project be initiated and implemented in conjunction and cooperation with the proposed redevelopment of the easterly portion of the Brookdale Shopping Center site. *j. Authorizing the Submission of an Amendment to the City of Brooklyn Center Community Development Program for Year XII and to Hennepin County for a Consideration as Part of the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program, in Accordance with Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as Amended -This resolution will provide funds for the demolition of 1500 55th Avenue North. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- January 12, 1987 k. Amending the 1987 General Fund Budget -This resolution would provide funds for replacing a camera and 30 sets of turnout gear for the Fire Department. *1. Renewal of Insurance Contracts *m. Acknowledging Gift -The Lions Club has presented the City a gift of $1,000 for the Entertainment in the Parks Program. *n. Acknowledging Gift -The Brooklyn Center Rotary Club has presented the City a gift of $800 for the purchase of flowers for Central Park. *o. Recognizing the Achievement of Reverend Antoni S. Bury - Reverend Bury swam 500 miles at the Community Center. *p. Granting a Bank of Sick Leave to Marvin Hondl -Staff is preparing a Personnel Ordinance amendment to deal with situations similar to this. *q. Requesting Improvements � g p on Count Road 10 Adjacent to Y 7 Brookdale Shopping Center 16. Public Hearings: 7:30 .m. g ( p ) a. Hearing Regarding Improvement Project No. 1986 -05, Acquisition of Right -of -Way for Establishment of Grimes Avenue North between Lakebreeze Avenue and the South Line of the North One Half (N1 /2) of Section 10, T118, R21 -This project provides for the acquisition of right -of- way to allow future development of an access road to the Joslyn Corporation property. 1. Resolution Ordering Improvement Project No. 1986 -05 - Adoption of this resolution calls for a 4/5 roll call vote of the Council. 2. Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to Exercise Options for Purchase of Right -of -Way for Improvement Project No. 1986 - 05 3. Resolution Accepting Proposal to Provide Professional Services Relating to Replatting of Lots 1 & 2 of Block 1, Dale and Davies 3rd Addition as Related to Improvement Project No. 1986 -05 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -4- January 12, 1987 b. Hearing Regarding Proposed Assessment for Project No. 1986 -05, Acquisition of Right -of -Way for the Establishment of Grimes Avenue North between Lakebreeze Avenue North and the South Line of the North One Half (N1 /2) of Section 10, Township 118, Range 21 1. Resolution Adopting Assessment for Improvement Project No. 1986 -05 17. Consideration of Specified License: a. On -Sale Club License -Duoos Brothers American Legion *18. License to Utilize Explosives for the Howe Company 19. Discussion Items: a. Year 2000 Issue No. 12 - Report and Policy Recommendation from Human Rights Commission b. Deletion of Fee Schedule from Chapter 23 c. Gambling License for Brooklyn Center Lions *20. Licenses 21. Adjournment S L Y ,.c. r cl 7 �t -_ J f �'.'. �� A , C f3� g:' , �• II � � � L9�i��r off— dN ( s-✓ X Z S c,•� �q S ny - AW •..rte Ago SE C i . / I -- 1 r. � � r Y 2 1 L'" ! �' S p/ SS� a5hq -�'�9 1 � IL os� '9 ti � t • / / -1 i �'' ,� -- �, 4 ._ � ;• - � ., 1 � � � '� f ,� �� .. ,; , ��' �� f ,,� , �, , ', , �; . � � �� , vo 1i a Q S y gOr �a INotrk oi l -Data irk . � � ,i� I J' J' �/ f f .-� s � v/ �� all ;•A:7 Lt/ �cp - Y Al ��'� �� ,., �; • � _ )j: t ., . �.S `` �.. � / 1 _� -_ �' • 0 i i - � �' j. � ��. �� r � - ; 9 • �`, � ;'�i � .� e.• -rte i ' . � n -� loot," x s � AMW o k� �t iii L6 / /-1 i Y I 1 r � li IL C � � L° �- sue : ♦ Y _ VOM ti T 1 1 � � Y r�l a 3 �o /3 Q J� � i e� 1.� ��, � i s � �� y s ee� �.n �33� �� i� � �� n �. G � G� l S � i CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER E YIPLOYEE RECOGNITION NIGHT CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. JANUARY 12, 1987 IIERN CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION NIGHT January 12, 1987 Tonight is the eighth annual presentation by the City Council of service awards to City Employees to recognize years of service to the City. Recognition is to be given tonight to those employees who, during 1986, observed the anniversary of either twenty or twenty —five years of permanent full —time employment with the City. The awards are a part of a service recognition program approved by the City Council in 1979. Three persons, who are listed below, will receive awards this evening. EMPLOYEES WITH TWENTY YEARS OF SERVICE SCOTT KLINE Police Captain January 17, 1966 DONALD SPEHN Police Officer January 17, 1966 EMPL 0 YEE S WITH TWENTY—FIVE YEARS OF SERVICE RICHARD SCHWAB Public Works Supervisor April 25, 1961 The employees recognized this evening are representative of all City employees who serve their City well. IIER1 ACTIVE CITY EMPLOYEES WITH TWENTY OR MORE YEARS OF SERVICE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1986, AND WHO HAVE BEEN RECOGNIZED BY THE COUNCIL IN PAST YEARS, ARE: THIRTY OR All ORF YEARS OF SE'R VI CE RICHARD JENNRICH, Equipment Operator (33) ROBERT CAHLANDER, Supervisor of Streets and Parks (31) T T'FENT Y -FIVE OR MORE YEARS OF SE'R VI CE JAMES LINDSAY, Chief of Police (27) ALLEN BRAUN, Engineering Technician (26) RICHARD SCHWAB, Public Works Supervisor (25) T E T 7'r 1 T y 1 Y OR 1�7DR YEAR S OF SERVICE RICHARD HANDY, Police Officer (24) LEROY CHRISTENSON, Police Officer (23) GARY GIVING, Engineering Technician (23) DONALD SOLLARS, Police Sergeant (22) PAUL HOLMLUND, Director of Finance (22) DAVID WERNER, Police Sergeant (21) SCOTT KLINE, Police Captain (20) DONALD SPEHN, Police Officer (20) One hundred four employees, of a total of one hundred twenty three full —time authorized City Employees, have served the City for more than five years. An analysis of permanent full —time service as of December 31, 1986 f ollows: Accumulative Employees with 30 or more years service 2 2 Employees with 25 or more years service 3 5 Employees with 20 or more years service 8 13 Employees with 15 or more years service 16 29 Employees with 10 or more years service 31 60 Employees with 5 or more years service 44 104 Employees with less than 5 years service 19 Total Permanent City Employees 123 IIER2 MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 22, 1986 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, and Rich Theis. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Finance Director Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning & Inspection Ron Warren, City Attorney Richard Schieffer, HRA Coordinator Brad Hoffman, Fire Chief Ron Boman, and Administrative Aid Patti Page. Mayor Nyquist noted that Councilmember Hawes would be absent from this evening's meeting. INVOCATION The invocation was offered by Father Griles of St. Alphonsus Catholic Church. OPEN FORUM Mayor Nyquist noted the Council had not received any requests to use the Open Forum session this evening. He inquired if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to address the Council. There being none, he continued with the regular agenda items. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Nyquist inquired if any Councilmembers requested any items removed from the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Lhotka requested item 9c be removed and Councilmember Theis requested item 9b be removed from the Consent Agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 8 1986 - REGULAR SESSION There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve the minutes of the December 8, 1986 City Council meeting. The motion passed. PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASE - SHINGLE CREEK BUSINESS CENTER SITE There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve the performance bond release for the Shingle Creek Business Center Site at Freeway Boulevard and Shingle Creek Parkway. The motion passed. PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASE - R C M PLAZA There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to release the performance bond for R.C.M. Plaza, 6701 Parkway Circle. The motion passed. 12 -22 -86 -1- J PERFORMANCE BOND REDUCTION - PARKWAY PLACE There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to reduce the performance bond from $85,000 to $40,000 for Parkway Place, 6601 Shingle Creek Parkway. The motion passed. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -201 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR DELIVERY OF TWO (2) 28,000 GVW CAB AND CHASSIS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously. LICENSES There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve the following list of licenses: BOWLING ALLEY LICENSE Earle Brown Bowl 6440 James Circle CIGARETTE LICENSE Marc's Big Boy 5440 Brooklyn Boulevard Brookdale Ford 2500 County Road 10 Brooks Superette 6800 Humboldt Avenue N. Budgetel Inn 6415 James Circle Canteen Company of Minnesota 6300 Penn Avenue S. FMC 1800 Freeway Boulevard Chuck's 365 1505 69th Avenue N. M & S Drug Emporium 5900 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Earle Brown Bowl 6440 James Circle Holiday Inn 1501 Freeway Boulevard Ideal Drug 6800 Humboldt Avenue N. Jerry's Brookdale Super Valu 5801 Xerxes Avenue N. Jimmy Jingle 1304 East Lake Street Brookdale Corporate Center 6300 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Palmer Lake Plaza 6860 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Service America Corporation 7490 Central Avenue NE Dayton's Brookdale Center Graco 6820 Shingle Creek Pkwy. MTC 6845 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Snyder Brothers Drug Brookdale Center Theisen Vending Company 3804 Nicollet Avenue S. T. J. Applebee's Brookdale Center Chuck Muer's Restaurant 2101 Freeway Boulevard Ramada Hotel 2200 Freeway Boulevard T. Wright's 5800 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Thrifty Scot Motel 6445 James Circle Bill West Union 76 2000 57th Avenue N. Total Petroleum, Inc. 6830 Brooklyn Boulevard Wes' Amoco 6044 Brooklyn Boulevard Woodside Enterprises 11889 65th Avenue N. 12 -22 -86 -2- 1 Bakers Square 5601 Xerxes Avenue N. COURTESY BENCH LICENSE U. S. Bench Corporation 3300 Snelling Avenue FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE Hickory Farms Brookdale Center GASOLINE SERVICE STATION LICENSE Chuck's 365 1505 69th Avenue N. LODGING ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE Budgetel Inn 6415 James Circle Holiday Inn 1501 Freeway Boulevard NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE Midwest Vending Company 8850 Wentworth Avenue S. Pilgrim Cleaners 5744 Morgan Avenue N. Service America Corporation 7490 Central Avenue NE MTC 6845 Shingle Creek Pkwy. NURSING HOME LICENSE Maranatha Conservative Home 5401 69th Avenue N. OFF -SALE NONINTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE Brooks Superette 6804 Humboldt Avenue N. Chuck's 365 1505 69th Avenue N. Country Club Market 5715 Morgan Avenue N. Country Store 3600 63rd Avenue N. Jerry's Brookdale Super Valu 5801 Xerxes Avenue N. Super America #4058 1901 57th Avenue N. Super America #4160 6545 West River Road ON -SALE NONINTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE Beacon Bowl 6525 Lyndale Avenue N. Chuck Wagon Inn 5720 Morgan Avenue N. Davanni's 5937 Summit Avenue N. Denny's Restaurant 3901 Lakebreeze Avenue N. 50's Grill 5524 Brooklyn Boulevard Little Brooklyn 6219 Brooklyn Boulevard Pizza Hut 6000 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Rocky Rococo's 1267 Brookdale Center Scoreboard Pizza 6816 Humboldt Avenue N. ON -SALE SUNDAY INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE T. Wright's Restaurant 5800 Shingle Creek Pkwy. PERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE Service America Corporation 7490 Central Avenue NE MTC 6845 Shingle Creek Pkwy. POOL & BILLIARD TABLE LICENSE 12 -22 -86 -3- 1 Holiday Inn 1501 Freeway Boulevard PUBLIC DANCE LICENSE Earle Brown Bowl 6440 James Circle Holiday Inn 1501 Freeway Boulevard RENTAL DWELLING LICENSE Initial: Thomas Dunlap 5814 Ewing Avenue North Renewal: Randall B. Cook 5347 Brooklyn Boulevard Fred Johnson 5324 Bryant y Avenue North Guy and Patricia Reuss 5824 Camden Avenue North Larry elds }' 6618 Camden Drive North Ronald Nyberg 5301 Dupont Avenue North H.E. Homes, Inc. 6804 Fremont Place H.E. Homes, Inc. 6809 Fremont Place H.E. Homes, Inc. 6820 Fremont Place H.E. Homes, Inc. 6824 Fremont Place H.E. Homes, Inc. 6831 Fremont Place Walt Halberg 6835 Fremont Place Vernon Vendel 5651 Knox Avenue North Henry R. Johnson 6736 Scott Avenue North Eugene W. Hess 3218 63rd Avenue North H.E. Homes, Inc. 1323 67th Lane Walt Halberg 1326 67th Lane H.E. Homes, Inc. 1339 67th Lane Nancy and Jack Huang 5419 70th Circle Gladys Perisian 3806 72nd Avenue North SIGN HANGERS LICENSE Midway Sign Company, Inc. 444 North Prior Avenue The motion passed. RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED) The City Manager presented a Resolution Setting Wages and Salaries for Calendar Year 1987. Councilmember Theis inquired how this recommendation compares with other area city settlements. The City Manager stated that the cities of Crystal, Maple Grove and Brooklyn Park have settled at 4 %. He noted that other cities have settled at 3.5 %. He stated that he chose 3.5% because it would be easier to add an additional 1/2% later on than it would be to take the money away. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -202 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION SETTING WAGES AND SALARIES FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1987 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by 12 -22 -86 _4_ member Gene Lhotka, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Amending he 1986 General Fund d Budget. He noted that this is an annual year end budget amendment that provides supplemental budget appropriation for several departments that would otherwise exceed their budgets. Councilmember Theis noted the large difference between the general recreational programs and the adult recreational programs. He stated that he was concerned that the City may be emphasizing the adult programs more than the children programs. The City Manager stated that according to a study conducted a few years ago, the City of Brooklyn Center is quite well balanced for programs provided to all age groups. He noted that the difference comes from underestimating the revenue for these other programs in 1986. Councilmember Lhotka inquired why the Legal Counsel Budget needed an additional appropriation. The City Manager stated that this additional appropriation is due to the fact that the legal counsel handled two rather large projects this past year, those being the Lescault case and the Berge case. RESOLUTION NO 86 -203 Member Rich Theis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1986 GENERAL FUND BUDGET The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Gene Lhotka, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Transferring Funds from the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund to the General Fund. Councilmember Lhotka stated that he had mistakenly removed this item from the Consent Agenda. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -204 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER FUNDS FROM THE FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND TO THE GENERAL FUND The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Authorizing Purchase of Optech III -P Optical Scan Voting System and Supporting Equipment. He noted that originally staff had recommended purchasing one additional unit, but after further review the staff now recommends purchasing two additional units. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -205 Member Rich Theis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF OPTECH III -P OPTICAL SCAN VOTING SYSTEM AND SUPPORTING EQUIPMENT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. 12 -22 -86 _5_ The City Manager presented a Resolution Approving Expenditure of Data Processing Appropriation in the 1986 General Fund Budget for a LOGIS Fire Department System. The City Manager noted that it would be possible to transfer the records off of the micro computer into the main frame if it was found that the micro computer was not working. Councilmember Scott inquired who would be loading the information into the computer. The Fire Chief stated that the Fire Department's secretary and one or two others would be handling this project. Councilmember Theis inquired why the Fire Chief had chosen the micro computer over the main frame. The Fire Chief stated that within three years the cost of operating the main frame computer would exceed the initial cost of the micro computer. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -206 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE EXPENDITURE OF DATA PROCESSING APPROPRIATION IN THE 1986 GENERAL FUND BUDGET FOR AN AUTOMATED LOGIS FIRE INFORMATION SYSTEM The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEMS BOND ISSUE REFUNDING The City Manager stated that the City's bond consultant had notified the City that the City has two or three bond issues which would qualify for refunding. He noted that these bond issues were sold when interest rates were quite high. The Director of Finance stated that the net savings would be $300,000 to $500,000. Councilmember Theis inquired if this would be permanent financing. The Director of Finance stated that at this point it looks as though it would be some type of permanent financing. There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to authorize the staff to prepare a proposal for the refinancing of certain bond issues. The motion passed. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR 1986 FINANCIAL AUDIT The City Manager stated that if the agreement meets with the Council's approval the Council should, by motion, authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into the agreement. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Theis to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement with Seifert, Betts, and Company, Ltd., Certified Public Accountants. The motion passed. REVIEW OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT CONDITIONS The City Manager stated that at a previous meeting the Council had requested the City Attorney to review the special use permit conditions regarding the transfer of these permits to new owners. The City Attorney stated that approximately 15 years ago the Legislature amended the zoning legislation which stated that a 12 -22 -86 -6- conditional use permit remains in effect until one of the conditions is violated. He stated that as long as the City treats these permits as conditional uses, and as long as the conditions of the permit are maintained, the City cannot legally set an expiration date. He added that one alternative could be a license but this would not allow the City the leverage that it now has with conditional use permits. Councilmember Scott noted that it is the property that is granted a conditional use permit not the individual. The City Attorney responded affirmatively. Councilmember Theis inquired if a condition could be placed on the permit which would distinguish the operator. The City Attorney stated that most conditions placed on these permits have pertained to the property and not the operator. Councilmember Lhotka inquired if a time period could be set on the permit to see if the proposed use works well for the property. The City Attorney stated that if the owner would agree to waive his rights and set a time period for renewal, this could be done. Councilmember Scott stated that she thought the Council had been making an informal agreement with the property owners all along for review after a certain time period. The City Attorney stated that this agreement should be in writing and not an informal verbal agreement. Councilmember Theis asked if it would be possible for the Council to change the hours on a permit if problems arise. The City Attorney stated that the permit does not allow for change in circumstances, and that the owner would have a right to the first agreement. The City Manager stated that he would like the staff and the City Attorney to have more time to review the situation further. PUBLIC HEARING - SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS The HRA Coordinator stated that these bonds would be similar to the bonds which were issued for the Brookwood project. Councilmember Theis asked what the City's chances of obtaining these bonds were. The HRA Coordinator stated that there is $28 million available and only three communities applying for the funds. Councilmember Theis inquired why other cities are not applying. The HRA Coordinator stated that once a City has received an allocation it must wait three years to apply again. Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on 1986 Single Family Revenue Bond Program, and inquired if there was anyone present who wished to speak at the public hearing. No one requested to speak and he entertained a motion to close the public hearing. There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to close the public hearing on 1987 Single Family Revenue Bond Program. The motion passed. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -207 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ADOPTING A HOUSING BOND PROGRAM FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF SAME TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. 12 -22 -86 _7_ PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION N0. 86042 SUBMITTED BY LOMBARD PROPERTIES REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM THE SIGN ORDINANCE TO ALLOW A PERMANENT PROJECT IDENTIFICATION SIGN FOR THE EIGHT - PARCEL SHINGLE CREEK BUSINESS CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY AND FREEWAY BOULEVARD AND PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO 86043 SUBMITTED BY LOMBARD PROPERTIES REQUESTING A VARIANCE FORM THE SIGN ORDINANCE TO ALLOW TWO OFF SITE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY AND PARKWAY CIRCLE The City Manager noted this item y g m was recommended for approval b the Planning PP y g Commission at its December 11, 1986 meeting. He added that the Director of Planning & Inspection would like to present both Planning Commission Application Nos. 86042 and 86043 at the same time. The Director of Planning & Inspection referred the Council to pages one through three of the December 11, 1986 Planning Commission minutes and the attached informational sheet with those minutes. He proceeded to review the application and noted that a public hearing had been scheduled on both applications. The Director of Planning & Inspection stated that the proposed freestanding identification sign would advertise the entire complex of buildings developed by Lombard Properties. He noted that it would pertain to developments not on the site where the sign would be located. Therefore, the proposed sign would, to some extent, be an off -site sign or billboard. He stated that such signs are prohibited under Section 34 -130, Subsection 11 of the sign ordinance. He added that a variance has been approved for such sites as Brookdale, Northbrook, and Palmer Lake Plaza office /industrial complex. Councilmember Lhotka inquired what the sizes were of the three signs. The Director of Planning & Inspection stated that the smallest sign would be 44 1/2 sq. ft., the next in size 82 1/2 sq. ft. and the largest being 127 1/2 sq. ft. He noted that one of the conditions of the variance could be that the development of the office buildings would have to be started before construction of the signs begins. The Director of Planning & Inspection went on to review Planning Commission Application No. 86043. He noted that this item was also recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its December 11, 1986 meeting. He noted that Parkway Circle is not a public street and that the signs would not be on the boulevard or street right -of -way. He noted that the variances which were approved for Brookdale Ford and Cinema I, II, III, IV are similar to this application, because both these cases also involve developments that rely on other properties for access. The Director of Planning & Inspection went on to review the recommended conditions for Planning Commission Application Nos. 86042 and 86043. He noted that a public hearing had been scheduled and notices had been sent. The Director of Planning & Inspection introduced Ms. Cheryl O'Donnell of Sign Consultants who gave a brief description of the signs and the materials which would be used for the signs. Councilmember Lhotka inquired what material would be used for the three large signs. Ms. O'Donnell stated that the signs would be 12 -22 -86 -8- constructed from aluminum and would have a satin finish on them. She noted that the signs would be internally lighted on both the directional and project identification signs. Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Planning Commission Application Nos. 86042 and 86043. Mayor Nyquist inquired if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to speak at the public hearing. No one requested to speak and he entertained a motion to close the public hearing. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to close the public hearing on Planning Commission Application Nos. 86042 and 86043 submitted by Lombard Properties. The motion passed. Councilmember Lhotka inquired if the Council approves these applications, can the types of material and sizes proposed be tied into the conditions so that they could not change in the future. The City Attorney stated that a condition could be added noting the things that had been discussed this evening. Councilmember Lhotka asked how the City can distinguish this type of sign from a billboard. The Director of Planning & Inspection stated that according to the City ordinance definition a billboard is advertising something or building off - site. He added that the hardship that Lombard Properties cited for their reason for a variance is not being permitted to identify their development complex with a sign. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to approve Planning Commission Application No. 86042, subject to the following conditions: 1. No other freestanding sign within the Shingle Creek Business Center complex shall have an impact plan larger than the 127.5 sq. ft. of the largest panel of the proposed project identification signs. 2. A deed restriction limiting freestanding signs within the Shingle Creek Business Center to 127.5 sq. ft. shall be executed and filed with the title to the affected properties. 3. The permit for the proposed freestanding project identification sign shall not be issued until the building permit is issued for the planned office development on the same parcel. Any resubdivision of the land parcel at the northwest corner of Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Boulevard or development proposal for something other than a multi -story office development shall invalidate approve of this application. 4. The freestanding project identification sign authorized by this variance shall be in lieu of any and all other freestanding identification signs permitted by the Sign Ordinance for the property on which it shall be located. 12 -22 -86 _g_ 5. The freestanding project identification sign authorized by this variance shall be the same size, same design and same materials as indicated on the submitted plan. The motion passed. There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve Planning Commission Application No. 86043 submitted by Lombard Properties, subject to the following conditions: 1. No freestanding identification sign for an off -site property listed on the directional signs located at the intersections of Parkway Circle and Shingle Creek Parkway may be readily visible from the public streets. 2. The applicant shall install street signs denoting Parkway Circle and Shingle Creek Parkway that are consistent with the City's street signs at the two intersections in question prior to release of the financial guarantee for Parkway Place (6601 Shingle Creek Parkway). 3. The message of the directional signs shall be clearly directional in nature and subject to the height and size requirements of the Sign Ordinance. Variance approval pertains to location only. 4. The off -site directional signs authorized by this variance shall be the same size, same design and same materials as indicated o g n the submitted plan. The motion passed. RECESS The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 8:28 p.m. and reconvened at 8:31 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO 86044 SUBMITTED BY ED TROMBLEY REQUESTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL TO RESUBDIVIDE INTO TWO BUILDABLE LOTS THE LAND AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 61ST AND COLFAX AVENUE NORTH The City Manager anager noted this item was recommended o f r approval by the Planning Commission at its December 11, 1986 meeting. The Director of Planning & Inspection briefly reviewed the application and the placement of the present home on proposed Lot 1. Councilmember Lhotka returned to the table at 8:34 p.m. The Director of Planning & Inspection noted that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of Application No. 86044, subject to five conditions which he briefly reviewed for the Council. Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Planning 12 -22 -86 -10- 9 Commission Application No. 86044. He inquired if there was anyone present who wished to speak at the public hearing. No one requested to speak and he entertained a motion to close the public hearing. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Theis to close the public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 86044. The motion passed. The City Attorney stated that a condition should be added which would state that the abstract is subject to review by the City Attorney prior to final plat approval. There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve Planning Commission Application No. 86044 submitted by Ed Trombley, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 3. The existing wood shed on the proposed Lot 1 shall be relocated outside of the proposed drainage and utility easement along the easterly 5' of the property prior to release of the final plat for filing at the County. 4. The applicant shall enter into a standard utility hookup agreement prior to final plat approval. 5. No building permit shall be issued for a structure on the proposed Lot 2 until the proposed plat has received final approval and been filed at the County. 6. The abstract is subject to review by the City Attorney prior to final plat approval. The motion passed. CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIED LICENSE - ON -SALE CLUB LICENSE - DUOOS BROTHERS AMERICAN LEGION The City Manager presented the next agenda item and stated that representatives from the Legion are available as well as the Legion's legal counsel. He noted that the Council had received a copy of the investigation report for this license. Councilmember Lhotka inquired if new rules or regulations had been set by the bar committee at this time. Mr. Gary Flakne, attorney for the Duoos Brothers American Legion Club stated that no firm rules had been set at this time. Councilmember Scott inquired how the Club plans to start implementing rules that have not yet been set up. Mr. Flakne stated that some basic rules had been outlined in a letter which was addressed to the City Manager and the Chief of Police. Councilmember Lhotka noted that there appears to be some confusion among the people interviewed regarding the hours of operation for the S 12 -22 -86 -11- Club. Mr. Flakne stated that the new hours will begin when the new license period begins. He noted that the hours will be somewhat flexible in order to accommodate special occasions. Mayor Nyquist stated that it appears that nothing has actually been accomplished, only statements of what will be done when the new license begins. He stated that he could not vote in favor of the license based on the information presented this evening. He added that if the only reason the Legion Club exists is for the sale of liquor, then it does not belong in Brooklyn Center. Mr. Flakne stated that he feels the Legion Club has come a long way in the past eight to ten weeks and has accomplished a number of things. Councilmember Scott stated that no one doubts the Club's willingness and good intentions, but she is not sure that the willingness or good intentions of the club members will accomplish the change which is necessary. She stated that she would like to see written rules, regulations and positive actions being taken to achieve this change. Mr. Flakne stated that the new rules which were discussed with the Club could be implemented this evening if it were the Council's wish. Mr. Flakne then introduced Mr. Marlin Ronnei, the District Commander for the seven county area. Mr. Ronnei stated that he is a member of the Osseo American Legion Club as well as being the District Commander for the seven county area. He stated that he is more than willing to give assistance to any American Legion Club. He stated that he feels the Duoos Brothers Post has taken a number of steps which will be beneficial to both the Post and the City. Mayor Nyquist inquired if it would be possible to issue a license to the Duoos . Brothers Post with the Osseo Post being responsible for overseeing the actions of the Duoos Brothers Post. Mr. Ronnei stated that he would not be comfortable having another Post involved with the liquor license. He added that he would be more than happy to stay involved with this problem and give the Post guidance wherever it is needed. Councilmember Scott inquired if the Osseo Post has written rules and regulations. Mr. Ronnei responded affirmatively. Councilmember Scott stated that she had some questions regarding the "guest" rule. Mr. Ronnei stated that the definition of guest is quite large and that according to American Legion Club by -laws you do not have to be a guest of a member in order to enter the Club. He stated that a person must only sign the guest book in order to be admitted into the Club. Councilmember Scott stated that she would like to see a copy of the written rules and regulations. Councilmember Lhotka inquired of the City Attorney if the Council must issue the license for a one year period. The City Attorney stated that this license is under revocation at the present time, and that the new license can start whenever the Council so desires. Councilmember Lhotka inquired if the Council could approve the license for a three or six month period and then have a review of the license. The City Attorney stated that he did not feel this would be a good course of action for the Council to take. He stated that there are basically three directions in which the Council could go. The first being, the Council could not issue the license at all, and then a resolution would have to be approved setting forth the shortcomings of the Post. The second, would be to table this item to the next meeting allowing the applicant time to put in 12 -22 -86 -12- writing the things they intend to accomplish. The third course of action would be to table this item indefinitely and allow the applicant time to put in writing the things they intend to accomplish. Councilmember Scott stated that she feels the Post has taken a few good steps, but they have not gone far enough. She stated that she would not be able to vote in favor of approving the license this evening. Councilmember Lhotka stated that the letter written by Mr. Flakne is very general and that he believes the Council is looking for specifics. Mr. Flakne stated that it would not be that difficult to set the rules down in black and white and implement them immediately. He further stated that he did not realize the Council and staff wanted specifics, or that would have been done from the beginning. Mayor Nyquist stated that since the Council and staff is aware of all the past problems with the Legion Club the City would be linked in a lawsuit, if an accident occurred after the City Council approved the liquor license. Mr. Flakne stated that if the Council tables the license until the January 12, 1987 Council meeting this would result in an 18 day penalty which would cause great financial difficulties for the Post. The City Manager stated that if Mr. Flakney would submit a written set of rules and regulations as soon as possible to him, he would forward the copies to the Council for their comment. He noted that by doing this there should be no lack of communication at the January 12 meeting. Mayor Nyquist recognized Mr. Perry Ronnei, Post Commander for the Duoos Brothers Post. He stated that 18 days would create quite a hardship on the Legion Club and that he was not sure what type of rules the Council was looking for. He added that every Legion Club has a standard set of rules. Councilmember Scott inquired if these standard rules were in writing. Mr. Ronnei responded affirmatively. Councilmember Lhotka inquired if these rules were posted where everyone could see them. He inquired how these rules are communicated to the membership. Mr. Flakne stated that the current rules are posted and that he felt the police were satisfied with these rules. He stated that he did not know the rules were an issue and if he had he would have brought the rules this evening. There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to table this license in order to allow the Post time to supply more information to the City Manager and Council for their review before the January 12, 1987 City Council meeting. The motion passed. Councilmember Theis stated that he would also like to see a copy of the Osseo Post rules. Mayor Nyquist stated that he would like to see Mr. Ronnei from the Osseo Post continue to monitor the Duoos Brother Post progress. Mr. Flakne stated that at this time he would like to turn over to the Clerk a petition from residents and letters from businesses urging the approval of this license. DISCUSSION ITEM REQUEST TO TABLE FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF A TRANSITION METHOD OF CITY TERMS UNTIL JANUARY 26 1987 MEETING 12 -22 -86 -13- The City Manager stated that the staff and the City Attorney's office has not had sufficient time to review this item, and is requesting the Council to table further consideration until the January 26, 1987 meeting. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Theis to remove from the table and retable any further consideration of the adoption of a transition method of City Council terms until the January 26, 1987 City Council meeting. The motion passed. SOLID WASTE RECYCLING CENTER The City Manager noted that Hennepin County has adopted an ordinance requiring each community to reduce the amount of solid waste generated within its respective boundaries by 16% by the year 1990. He stated that it is proposed that the three communities -- Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, and Crystal - -enter into a contractual agreement with Goodwill Industries rtes to operate a recycling Y g center. He noted that this could be done under the Joint Powers Sanitation Agreement between Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, and Crystal. Councilmember Scott inquired how the public would be notified of this. She inquired if it would be the City or the County's responsibility. The HRA Coordinator stated that it would be the responsibility of the City and Goodwill Industries to notify he residents. nts. He stated that this would be accomplished by articles in the City's newsletter, the Brooklyn Center Post, and the cable network. He noted that this would be a drop off site in Brooklyn Park near the new Menard site. The City Manager added y g that depending on the success of this project more sites may have to be added. He stated that this will become a massive education process and that Goodwill Industries has the experience to make the program run smoothly. Councilmember Theis inquired how many people will actually go to Brooklyn Park to separate their recycables. The HRA Coordinator stated that it would only be a small dedicated group that would begin this process. The HRA Coordinator stated that in order for the City to receive reimbursement for the startup costs it is necessary for the City to make an expenditure by January 1, 1987. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -208 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1986 GENERAL FUND BUDGET AND AUTHORIZING A JOINT POWERS CONTRACT WITH GOODWILL INDUSTRIES The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 9 :55 p.m. City Clerk Mayor 12 -22 -86 -14- MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Patti Page, Administrative Aid DATE: January 9, 1987 SUBJECT: Advisory Commission Reappointments for 1987 The following is a list of advisory commission members whose terms expired on December 31, 1986. If the Mayor and City Council choose to reaffirm their reappointments, the terms are indicated. HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Donna Stoderl - reappointment for a three -year term Thomas Slupske - reappointment for a three -year term PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION Carl Manson - reappointment for a three -year term Don Peterson - reappointment for a three -year term PLANNING COMMISSION George Lucht - reappointment for a two -year term Lowell Ainas - reappointment for a two -year term Wallace Bernards - reappointment for a two -year term NORTHWEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL John Casey - reappointment for a two -year term pending his acceptance Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES OF CITY FUNDS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the First Brookdale State Bank be and is hereby designated as the depository for the funds of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following named banks are hereby designated additional depositories to be used for investment purposes: First National Bank of o Minnea f P is F &M Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis Norwest Bank Minneapolis First National Bank of St. Paul American National Bank of St. Paul Fidelity Bank and Trust Company P Y First Western Bank Camden Norwest Bank First Minnesota Savings Z Loan Association Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Association Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Association The City Treasurer is authorized to deposit City funds in the named depositories to the extent that repayment is guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and such additional funds not to exceed the amount of 90% of collateral pledged to the City, nd approved b the C' Y. PP Y City, by said depository. II I BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the ersons generally P g Y authorized by the City Charter to act for the City in any of its business with the depository are any persons holding office from time to time as City Manager and City Treasurer. All checks drawn upon an account of the City shall P Ci y 11 be signed by both of the above designated persons. BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is Gerald G. Splinter and the City Treasurer is Paul W. Holmlund. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota as follows: Celia Scott is hereby designated as a Representative of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, and Gerald G. Splinter is hereby designated to serve as Alternate Representative of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities for the year 1987 and until their successors are appointed. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING MAYOR NYQUIST'S 1987 SALARY WHEREAS, Mayor Dean Nyquist served as Mayor of Brooklyn Center in 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, and 1986 without salary compensation; and WHEREAS, Mayor Nyquist has officially requested that he not be compensated in 1987 for serving as Mayor of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, the City Council is appreciative of Mayor Nyquist's gesture and wishes to acknowledge his request and formally direct that no salary be given him in 1987 for serving as Mayor of Brooklyn Center. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to direct that Mayor Nyquist, at his own behest, not be compensated in 1987 for serving as Mayor of Brooklyn Center. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. lid Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE OF ALLAN D. BRAUN WHEREAS, Allan D. Braun has served the City of Brooklyn Center as an employee since May 27, 1960; and WHEREAS, he is retiring from public service on January 31, 1987; and WHEREAS, his devotion to the tasks and responsibilities as Engineering Technician III contributed substantially to the efficiency and level -of- service of the City; and WHEREAS, he has shared freely of his extraordinary artistic talents by preparing special maps and drawings for use by all City departments; and WHEREAS, he has consistently worked to provide good public relations through courtesy and informational assistance; and WHEREAS, he has served as a Notary Public; and WHEREAS, his overall generosity to share his capabilities and his snacks will be missed by other City employees; and WHEREAS, his public service and civic effort for the betterment of the community merit the gratitude of the citizens of Brooklyn Center. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, that the dedicated public service of Allan D. Braun is recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center and that the City wishes him a long and happy retirement. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. w /.Se Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REQUESTING TRANSFER OF TITLE FOR ONE PARCEL OF TAX- FORFEITED LAND ON APPRAISAL LIST 553 -A TO THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center has received, from the County of Hennepin, a list of lands in Brooklyn Center which became the property of the State of Minnesota for nonpayment of real estate taxes, which list has been designated as Appraisal List No. 553 -A; and WHEREAS, Tract K of Registered Land Survey No. 1325 (Property Identification No. 02- 118 -21 -12 -0008) is the right of way for that portion of Earle Brown Drive between John Martin Drive and Summit Drive, for which the City has previously acquired an easement by Quit Claim Deed: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center that the City of Brooklyn Center hereby requests conveyance of property identified as No. 02- 118 -21 -12 -0008 to the City of Brooklyn Center for public purposes. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and submit the City's application for said conveyance. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. N.112SEG.2, TH8.R.21 zoo o zoo ,ao SCALE: 1 INCH = 200 FEET - /� , scale I Itel �� X 6 1 th ° TRACT A 1 v' +tip ., • «. I594• e r^ 301.83 - — -- — — - ^\ •` ; ;h � �' •ti. t Ql q �, f• �•ea NB9 E y '•. i', 0. r i.:. . '` 2 �•`` •. x • 1 ' 1 , 1 • ,•.)>,...� CIO I 701.01 q a s •^ I SHINGI E i d Q o •• `.'. • ', ) . ch I s I j !. : tNp �.• Q.• �. �� v .•' •• '�er •*e• 1 , (r4) -) �f/ mi l. k5 0 1 •y � 1 ti A 0 0. - 0 ' r , �,,• y a� r J '1 y 0 T RACT A I t h) / J 1 •� tl •�.•/ Z •n Q R C T •r (. .. �1 L NO.1l00 },b A 6s1 t • f .•�)S �`� , r \' , 'i •. 1 Vl 1 ,) oa S 0� ► f� L b Gj h i'1 a ,'•� \V fr /%��J � (04)IaACT A NQ Am y r'.•.. \"A3'v•�•� . M► J tr. = � (, h /' f �• ps) TRACT B 19 �, R 1 ° °1 r °t ► g Q 9 d1 f v q :' .s� `' 4 . (�' 4 `' a J� 1 ♦ •,rte T R4 • ..� "�' F 150 ri' gy p' "i• • ". `_ • D •�, C - -0*. .„ .. A (Il N ss f u frfrc �_ 7D � •f..�`� t,' st t oo + r W M pot , j •. I so c _ r. I, i)N Nn lSo N/f•!i'et "f ' 111.1 rr � ^� t ,- - - - --- —! -- --•- ... - -- -• - -- -- ----- .�_ •�... . Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EARLE BROWN FARM TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT PHASE III STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -21, CONTRACTS 1986 -Q, 1986 -R AND 1986 -S) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The plans and specifications for the following improvements as prepared by the City Engineer and by Westwood Planning and Engineering Company, Inc. are approved and ordered filed with the City Clerk: EARLE BROWN FARM TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT PHASE III STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -21 CONTRACTS 1986 -Q, 1986 -R, AND 1986 -S 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least twice in the official newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published as required by law, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that said bids will be received by the City Clerk until the date and time specified, at which time they will be publicly opened at City Hall by the City Clerk and the City Engineer. Subsequently, the bids shall be tabulated and will then be considered by the City Council at a meeting of the City Council. The advertisement shall state that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for S percent of the total amount of such bid. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF B ROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTER EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works DATE: January 8, 1987 RE: Earle Brown Farm Tax Increment District Phase III Streetscape Improvements Enclosed are the following reports: - a report by City Engineer Bo Spurrier which summarizes the current status of development of the intersection nodes and sidewalks within the Tax Increment District; describes the improvements which we recommend to be included in Phase III development; and provides cost estimates for those improvements. - an Engineer's Report by Westwood Planning and Engineering Company which describes the landscaping and street lighting systems proposed for the Tax Increment District and provides cost estimates for those improvements. - a summary of all projects which have been completed, are currently under construction, are proposed to be included in the "Phase III" improvements, or are contemplated for future construction within the Tax Increment District. This report summarizes both expenses and revenues for each of the 7 major elements of improvements within the Tax Increment District, and was prepared primarily to show that the projects can be accomplished in conformance with the Tax Increment Project Budget. Plans and specifications have been prepared for the proposed Phase III improvement. Because this work falls into 3 distinctly different areas of ,construction expertise and specialty, i.e.: - construction of sidewalks, retaining walls and pavers at the nodes - installation of the lighting systems; and - installation of landscape plantings It is our recommendation that the work be placed into 3 separate contracts. The specifications require the 3 contractors to cooperate with each other, as specifically directed by our Project Engineer. „ '74 SomwZ 4 4 1 X A& January 8, 1987 Page 2 Approval of the plans and specifications at this time will allow bids to be taken and contracts awarded in February. This will allow all contractors to schedule the start of their work in early Spring. It should allow the lighting contractor adequate time to order and get delivery of lighting system equipment by mid - Summer. And, it will allow the landscaping contractor to place an early order for plantings and to install many of those plantings during the prime planting time. We, along with Brad Hoffman and a representative from Westwood Planning and Engineering Company, Inc. will be prepared to discuss these reports in more detail at the City Council meeting. A resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids is submitted for consideration by the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Sy Knap Director of Public Works SK: jn CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF :BR OOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTER EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 ENGINEER'S REPORT EARLE BROWN FARM TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT PHASE III STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -21 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project includes retaining walls, subgrade preparation, pavers and sidewalk. PROJECT LOCATION The Streetscape Improvement consists of the remaining landscape nodes and pavers and part of the remaining sidewalk proposed in the Earle Brown Farm Tax Increment District Master Plan prepared by Tim Erkkila of Westwood Planning and Engineering Company, Inc. Phase III sidewalk construction is the sidewalk adjacent to all developed property. The map in Appendix A locates the proposed sidewalk as well as the proposed node construction. INTRODUCTION On May 19, 1986 the City Council initiated work on the Earle Brown Farm Tax Increment District Streetscape Improvements by awarding the contract for the .construction of Phase I work on Summit Drive and John Martin Drive. Subsequent work on Phase II was approved July 28, 1986 for work on Summit Drive and Earle Brown Drive. "flcG ,SaMCe�fli�cg �14�tc (� •• Engineer's Report January 8, 1987 Page 2 The July report anticipated 4 phases of development for the Streetscape Improvements. The work proposed herein is the landscape node and sidewalk construction of Phase III of the Streetscape Improvement Project. DISCUSSION The landscape nodes consist of a retaining wall and decorative pavers at selected intersections in the Earle Brown Farm Tax Increment District. The retaining wall with textured wood surface and decorative pavers are a major feature that help create a special identity in the vicinity of the Historic Earle Brown Farm, FUNDING All of the work proposed under this part of Improvement Project No. 1986 -21 is included in the Earle Brown Farm Tax Increment District plan. It is recommended that the work be funded by the HRA from proceeds of the Tax Increment District. The estimated cost of the proposed work is summarized below. A detailed estimate of the work is included in the Appendix. PHASE III COST SUMMARY Landscape Node Construction $ 265,970 Sidewalk Construction 67.548 Subtotal $ 333,518 Technical Services (8 %) 26,681 Administration (1 %) 3,335 Legal (1 %) 3.335 Total $ 366,869 Engineer's Report January 8, 1987 Page 3 CONCLUSION The work proposed herein under Phase III will complete all of the landscape nodes and all of the sidewalk adjacent to developed property. The project is feasible and it is recommended for construction as proposed. It is recommended that City Council adopt the "Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications for Earle Brown Farm Tax Increment District Phase III Streetscape Improvements (Improvement Project No. 1986 -21, Contracts 1986 -Q, 1986 -R and 1986 -S) ". I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct superv'sion VSO. m a duly registered profe _0 al nder the laws of the Sta of Min !i, % D te: January 8, 1 87 Registration No. 13689 APPENDIX A -1 i PROJECT 3 STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT �wp ... / J y 9 ss� W FiiEeWAYi LV0. ' 1 I � i ENI AL C17Y L Civic C ol GARDENr� C17Y i�� \��'r x SUMMI I►� PARK r MENN. ca ueRARY a Q If 2 i I a ANO � GOVT SERV. C O �4� EAR Z `a ,X�h " e GRANOVIEW 8R0 h ? Q i o- PARK SO* 0. p . ° ® PROPOSED NODE PHASE III CSAH / NO\ 10 t \ • COMPLETED NODE PHASE I c UNDER CONST, NODE PHASE II COMPLETED SIDEWALK z PROPOSED SIDEWALK PHASE M FUTURE SIDEWALK PHASE IV 1 �,�� t v PERSPECTIVE -- CORNER NOD x APPENDIX A -3 DETAILED ESTIMATES PHASE III SIDEWALK DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT PRICE TOTAL MOBILIZATION 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK 19,469 SF 3.00 58,407.00 ---- - - - - -- SUBTOTAL $61,407.00 10% CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY 6,141.00 TOTAL SIDEWALK $67,548.00 PHASE III LANDSCAPE NODE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITS UNIT PRICE TOTAL MOBILIZATION 1 LS $8,000.00 $8,000.00 RETAINING WALL 561 SY 210.00 117,810.00 UNI -DECOR PAVING 17,545 SF 4.60 80,707.00 SIGN SLEEVES 11 EA 50.00 550.00 FILL MATERIAL 600 CY 6.50 3,900.00 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 450 SY 7.50 3,375.00 SAWCUT CONCRETE (4" -8. ") 80 LF 2.50 200.00 DESIGN "V" CURB 660 LF 10.00 6,600.00 AGGREGATE BASE (8 ") 867 TN 20.00 17,340.00 SAND BASE 81 TN 10.00 810.00 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 100 LF 10.00 1,000.00 CONSTRUCT B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 100 LF 15.00 1,500.00 SUBTOTAL $241,792.00 10% CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY 24,178.00 ---- - - - - -- TOTAL LANDSCAPE NODE $265,970.00 A ENGINEER'S REPORT October 22, 1986 Earle Brown Farm Redevelopment Area Landscaping and Street Lighting City Project No. 1986 -21 City Contract No. 1986 —R PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Streetscape design for intersections and boulevards with an overall street lighting system. PROJECT LOCATION: Within the project area bounded by Shingle Creek Parkway on the west, Earle Brown Drive on the north and east, and John Martin Drive on the south. DISCUSSION: The development of the Earle Brown Farm area has been the focus of comprehensive study and planning in terms of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, lighting, building character, building character, building massing, and sight lines. The goal of the study and planning has been to ensure an attractive, safe, and cohesive area in which to live and work. An integral part of this overall plan has been a streetscape design which is intended to create a visually unifying motif that also gives the area a recognizable and memorable identity. As part of the streetscape plan, detailed plans have been prepared for plantings at each node corner as well as for general street tree planting. Additionally, a decorative street system is proposed for the street system within the project area. A dual system has been designed providing for a street lighting system throughout the project area and a pedestrain lighting system at the major node intersectional areas. This report discusses the design details of the landscaping and lighting components of the proposed project. Additionally, cost estimates are summarized for the design features. The appendix contains a sketch of the project area with the proposed design elements highlighted. Detailed cost estimates are included and information on the proposed lighting products. STREETSCAPE DESIGN A wide variety of tree and shrub species have been used throughout the plans for reasons of design and plant health. Relying heavily on one particular species could be a problem if that species is suddenly affected by an epidemic type disease or insect problem. While each node has its own palette of plant materials providing subtle differences, the overall visual design effect remains constant from one node to the next, i.e., low and spreading shrubs immediately behind the walls with increasingly gly taller shrubs behind them. Seasonal interest was a major goal, therefore, plant materials with special features such as flowers, berries, fall foliage color, and evergreens were used prodigiously. The massing of shrubs behind the walls is informal to contrast with the architectural lines and angles of the walls. Engineer's Report October 22, 1986 Page 2 The street tree planting plan features one particular species at each node and repeats this species es alon the street P P et on either side f the n g o ode. Th is creates the effect along any street between two nodes of two dominant species of trees. For example, Red Maple is features at the node at Shingle Creek Parkway and John Martin Drive. Redmond Linden is featured at the John Martin Drive and Earle Brown Drive node. Therefore, Red Maple and Linden are predominant on both sides of John Martin Drive between these two nodes. Some additional deciduous trees and evergreens have also been used in smaller quantities for visual accents and plant health. An informal placement and grouping of trees has been employed as opposed to the more commonly used, evenly spaced, boulevard effect. This clustering of trees is intended to tie in with the curvilinear sidewalk concept. It is felt that the overall effect reflects the informal feeling of the farm property which is the major focus of the area. All of the species used are generally hardy for this area, however, it should be noted that urban street corners are brutal environments for plant materials (snow, salt, etc.) Some care and maintenance will be necessary particularly during the first two to three years after installation. Below is a summary of the cost estimate for the streetscape elements, as proposed. STREETSCAPE COST ESTIMATE Materials and Construction Cost $ 87,979.00 Contingency 107 8,798.00 Subtotal $ 96,777.00 Technical Services - Consultant 1,200.00 - City 1,936.00 Administration 968.00 Legal 968.00 Total Streetscape $104,849.00 LIGHTING DESIGN A dual lighting system has been designed for the project area. The proposal has been analyzed in terms of light levels, uniformity of lighting on the street and sidewalk areas, the type of lamp to be utilized and the selection of a decorative system compatible with the project environment. The street lighting system designed more specifically for illuminating the roadway area is proposed to consist of "Marquette" fixtures on square tapered steel poles with a 30 +35 foot mounting height. These high level mounted poles are uniformly spaced throughout the project at a distance measured along the street centerline of approximately 200 feet. Engineer's Report October 22, 1986 Page 3 The lighting on Shingle Creek Parkway is proposed to utilize 250 watt high pressure sodium vapor lamps to provide a level of illumination approaching 1.5 footcandles, similar to the current light levels. Mounting heights are proposed to be 35 feet. This design will meet State Aid standards and allow the City to gain MSA funding for the Shingle Creek Parkway lighting installation. The other street lighting within the project area will utilize 150 watt high pressure sodium vapor lamps. Lesser traffic volumes and a narrower street width allow the reduced lamp wattage. Slightly lower illumination levels will be noticed on these side streets when compared with Shingle Creek Parkway. Mounting .ountin heights on these streets will Y• g e 30 g b feet. A pedestrian lighting system is proposed for the intersection node areas and is directed primarily towards pedestrian scale illumination. Although, because of the number of fixtures in each node area, adequate illumination for the street area will be available. The system is proposed to utilize a "Kensington" fixture mounted on a 12 foot round aluminum pole. A 70 watt high pressure sodium vapor lamp is required for each fixture. Part of the proposal involves the placement of underground conduit throughout the project area for the safety and preservation of the street lighting wire. The high level lighting system and the low level lights are proposed to be constructed on separate electrical circuits. This will allow the two systems to be operated autonomously. Individual maintenance and power agreements could be arranged for either system. As an example, Northern States Power Company could be contracted to maintain the high level system while the City maintains the low level system. As an energy savings, one system could be operated all night, with the other system de— energized after pedestrian activity has ceased. Thirty —six low level lighting poles and fixtures are proposed. Thirty — seven high level poles and fixtures will uniformly blend the overall sys— tem. Shingle Creek Parkway is a Municipal State Aid roadway and qualifies for State Aid reimbursement of a portion of the project costs. Of the 73 poles and fixtures proposed, 21 are located on Shingle Creek Parkway (9 high level 12 low g , o level). The estimate shown on the following page has Shingle Creek Parkway costs separated from the other lighting components of the project. Lighting System Cost Estimate Shi ngle Creek Parkway High level poles, fixtures, wiring R conduit (9) $ 44,022.00 Low level poles, fixtures, wiring R conduit (12) 32,204. Suhtotal $ 76,226.00 Contingency 10% 7,622.00 Subtotal $ 83,848.00 Technical Services Consultant $ 3,297.51 City 1,670.00 Administration 838.48 Legal 838.48 Total $ 90,492.47 Summit Drive, Earle B rown Driv & John Mart Drive High level poles, fixtures, wiring & conduit (28) $ 135,614.00 Low level poles, fixtures, wiring R conduit (24) 78,938.00 Subtotal $ 214,552.00 Contingency 10% 21,455.00 Subtotal $ 236,007.00 Technical Services Consultant $ 9,351.78 City i 4,750.00 Administration 2,377.95 Legal 2,377.95 Total $ 256,652.61 *Price includes 1 additional 35' pole & fixture 1 additional 30' pole & fixture 2 additional 12' poles & fixtures *Total lights to be installed = 73 units = $ 347,145.08 *Price also includes salvaging 2 e istin e R delivering g g x g poles d.li Bring same to City Maintance Facility. Engineer's Report October 22, 1986 Page 5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The lighting and streetscape improvements as described herein are feasible under the conditions outlined and at the cost estimated. It is recommended the City Council approve these projects for construction and authorize staff to prepare the advertisement for bids. If the projects are approved, it is recommended the bids be taken in February with construction commencing in April, 1987. Respectfully submitted, WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY "1. Richard L. Koppy, P.E. Vice — President Registration No. 11083 Timothy Er kila, ASIA Vice— President Registration No. �zz,� EARLE BROWN FARM AREA STREETSCAPE BID SHEET MATERIALS LIST UNIT TOTAL ITEM QTY. UNIT PRICE PRICE Shredded Wood Mulch 245 C.Y. $ 35.00 $ 8,575.00 Weed Control Fabric br c 1925 S.Y. 1.35 2,599.00 Black Plastic Edger 2780 L.F. 1.20 3,336.00 PLANT LIST UNIT TOTAL COMMON NAME/BOTANICAL NAME QTY. SIZE /ROOT PRICE PRICE Boston Ivy /Parthenocissus tricuspidata 5 2 yr. Pot 15.00 75.00 Black Hills Spruce /Picea glauca densata 11 7' B.B. 160.00 1,760.00 Black Hills Spruce /Picea glauca densata 24 5' B.B. 130.00 3,120.00 Compact Amur Maple /Acer ginnala 'Compacta' 23 36" Pot 25.00 575.00 Columnar Buckthorn /Rhamnus frangula 43 4' Pot 35.00 1,505.00 Common Hackberry /Celtis occidentalis 6 3- 1 /2 "B.B. 250.00 1,500.00 Common Hackberry /Celtis occidentalis 1 2" B.B. 150.00 150.00 Crimson Pygmy Barberry /Berberis thunbergii 'Crimson Pygmy' 121 15 Pot 20.00 2,420.00 Dwarf European Cranberry /Viburnum opulus 'Nanum' 53 18 Pot 18.00 954.00 Dwarf Korean Lilac /Syringa meyeri 50 24" Pot 20.00 1 Dwarf Mugho Pine /Pinus mugo 'Compacta' 21 24" Pot 35.00 735.00 Dwarf Ninebark /Physocarpus opulifolius 'Nanus' 31 36" Pot 25.00 775.00 Engelman Ivy /Parthenocissus quinquefolia 'Engelmanii' 7 2 yr. Pot 15.00 105.00 Emerald Queen Maple /Acer platanoides 'Emerald Queen' 8 3- 1 /2 "B.B. 250.00 2,000.00 Emerald Queen Maple /Acer platanoides 'Emerald Queen' 15 2 B.B. 180.00 2,700.00 Hosta,Royal Standard /Hosta 'Royal Standard' 118 2 yr. Pot 6.00 708.00 Isanti Dogwood /Cornus sericea ' Isanti' 59 36" Pot 28.00 1,652.00 Japanese Spirea /Spiraea japonica 'Alpina' 70 12" Pot 20.00 1,400.00 Kentucky Coffeetree /Gymnocladus dioicus 7 2 B.B. 200.00 1,400.00 Mint Julep Juniper /Juniperus chinensis 'Mint Julep' 105 24" Pot 30.00 3,150.00 Northwood Red Maple /Acer rubrum 'Northwood' 6 3- 1 /2 "B.B. 280.00 1,680.00 Northwood Red Maple /Acer rubrum 'Northwood' 11 2" B.B. 210.00 2,310.00 Nearly Wild Rose /Rosa 'Nearly Wild' 51 18" Pot 22.00 1,122.00 Pin Oak /Quercus palustris 2 3- 1 /2 "B.B. 280.00 560.00 Pin Oak /Quercus palustris 36 2" B.B. 200.00 7,200.00 Peegee Hydrangea /Hydrangea paniculata 'Grandiflora' 15 24" Pot 20.00 300.00 Red Grootendorst Rose /Rosa Rugosa 'Red Grootendorst' 16 24" Pot 22.00 352.00 Redmond Linden /Tilia x euchlora 'Redmond' 6 3- 1 /2 "B.B. 250.00 1,500.00 Redmond Linden /Tilia x euchlora 'Redmond' 19 2 B.B. 150.00 2,850.00 Summit Ash /Fraxinus pennsylvanica 'Summit' 2 3- 1 /2 "B.B. 250.00 500.00 UNIT TOTAL COMMON NAME /BOTANICAL NAME QTY. SIZE /ROOT PRICE PRICE Skyline Honeylocust /Gleditsia triacanthos 'Skyline' 6 3- 1 /2 "B.B. 250.00 1,500.00 Skyline Honeylocust /Gleditsia triacanthos 'Skyline' 17 2 B.B. 150.00 2,550.00 Scotch Pine /Pinus sylvestris 10 7' B.B. 160.00 1,600.00 Scotch Pine /Pinus sylvestris 18 5' B.B. 130.00 2,340.00 Snowmound Spirea /Spiraea nipponica 'Snowmound' 64 18" Pot 18.00 1,152.00 Techny Globe Arborvitae /Thuga occidentalis 'Techny' (Globe form) 12 24" Pot 35.00 420.00 Taunton Yew /Taxus x media 'Taunton' 70 24" Pot 38.00 2,660.00 Vanhoutte Spirea /Spiraea x vanhouttei 33 36" Pot 28.00 924.00 Winged Euonymus / Euonymus alata 33 36" Pot 32.00 1,056.00 Welchi Juniper /Juniperus scopulorum 'Welchii' 22 36" Pot 40.00 880.00 Webber Juniper /Juniperus horizontalis 'Webberi' 271 24" Pot 35.00 9,485.00 Wineleaf Potentilla / Potentilla tridentata 54 18" Pot 22.00 1,188.00 UNIT TOTAL ITEM QTY. SIZE PRICE PRICE Transplant Trees 2 3' 2" $200.00 $ 400.00 1 3 200.00 200.00 1 5 350.00 350.00 Transplant Shrubs 19 36" 24.00 456.00 Remove Trees 1 3 50.00 50.00 Remove Rock Mulch 200.00 200.00 TOTAL $87,978.75 Contingency + 10% $96,777.00 LIGHTING SYSTEM COST ESTIMATE SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY UNIT TOTAL ITEM QTY. UNIT '1 RICE Rls I HIGH LEVEL SYSTEM: 1. Sterner Marquette Fixtures & 35 foot square tapered steel pole 9 EACH 1400.00 12,600.00 2. Wiring, installation, fuse & lamp 9 EACH 260.56 2,345.00 3. Concrete bases with re -har R conduit 9 EACH 400.00 3,600.00 4. 2" R.S.C. in boulevard areas 1652 L.F. 8.50 14,042.00 5. 2" R.S.C. in pavement areas 225 L.F. 15.00 3,375.00 6. No. 6 THWN wire in conduit 2592 L.F. .50 1,296.00 7. Salvage existing poles 2 EACH 300.00 600.00 8. Additional 35' pole & fixture 1 EACH 1400.00 1,400.00 9. Feed point 33% EACH 4000.00 1,320.00 10. Hand hole 50% EACH 400.00 200.00 11. Restore sod in boulevard areas 1622 S.Y. 2.00 3,244.00 Subtotal 44,022.00 Contingency 10% 4,402.00 TOTAL HIGH LEVEL LIGHTING 48,424.00 LOW LEVEL SYSTEM 1. Sterner Kensington Fixtures & 12 foot round straight aluminum pole 12 EACH 800.00 9,600.00 2. Wiring, installation, fuse & lamp 12 EACH 160.00 1,920.00 3. Concrete bases with re -bar & conduit 12 EACH 400.00 4,800.00 4. 2" R.S.C. in boulevard areas 340 L.F. 8.50 2,890.00 5. 2" R.S.C. in pavement areas 315 L.F. 15.00 4,725.00 6. No. 6 THWN wire in conduit 1200 L.F. .50 600.00 7. Additional 12' pole & fixture 1 EACH 800.00 800.00 8. Feed point 42% EACH 4000.00 1,680.00 9. Hand holes 2.16 EACH 400.00 864.00 10. Restore sod in boulevard areas 2162.5 S.Y. 2.00 4,325.00 Subtotal 32,204.00 Contingency 10% 3,220.00 TOTAL LOW LEVEL LIGHTING 35,424.00 GRAND SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY LIGHTING 83,848.00 LIGHTING SYSTEM COST ESTIMATE CONTINUED LOCAL STREETS UNIT TOTAL HIGH LEVEL SYSTEM: ITEM QTY. UNIT PRICE PRICE 1. Sterner Marquette Fixtures R 30 foot square tapered steel pole 28 EACH 1303.00 36,484.00 2. Wiring, installation, fuse & lamp 28 EACH 260.61 7,297.00 3. Concrete bases with re -har & conduit 28 EACH 400.00 11,200.00 4: 2" R.S.C. in boulevard areas 5173 L.F. 8.50 4,397.50 5. 2" R.S.C. in pavement areas 820 L.F. 15.00 12,300.00 6. 3" R.S.C. in pavement areas 28 L.F. 15.00 420.00 7. No. 6 THWN wire in conduit 7655 L.F. .50 3,827.50 8. Additional 30' pole & fixture 1 EACH 1303.00 1,303.00 9. Feed point 1.33% EACH 4000.00 5,320.00 10. Hand hole 8.5 EACH 400.00 3,400.00 11. Restore sod in boulevard areas 5046 S.Y. 2.00 10,092.00 Subtotal 135,614.00 Contingency 10% 13,561.00 TOTAL HIGH LEVEL LIGHTING 149,175.00 LOW LEVEL SYSTEM 1. Sterner Kensington Fixtures & 12 foot round straight aluminum pole 24 EACH 800.00 1,920.00 2. Wiring, installation, fuse & lamp 24 EACH 160.00 3,840.00 3. Concrete bases with re -bar & conduit 24 EACH 400.00 9,600.00 4. 2" R.S.C. in boulevard areas 2161 L.F. 8.50 18,368.00 5. 2" R.S.C. in pavement areas 646 L.F. 15.00 9,690.00 6. 3" R.S.C. in pavement areas 28 L.F. 15.00 420.00 7. No. 6 THWN wire in conduit 3923 L.F. .50 1,961.50 8. Additional pole & fixture 1 EACH 800.00 800.00 9. Feed point 92% EACH 4000.00 3,680.00 10. Hand holes 6.82 EACH 400.00 2,728.00 11. Restore sod in boulevard areas 4325 S.Y. 2.00 8,650.00 Subtotal 78,938.00 Contingency 10% 7,894.00 TOTAL LOW LEVEL LIGHTING 86,832.00 GRAND TOTAL LOCAL STREETS LIGHTING 236,007.00 GRAND GRAND TOTAL LIGHTING SYSTEM 319,855.00 LLJ > GARDEN CITY �� c \�/, SUMMI Q PARK.,, \�- i', HENN.CO. L!BRARY r Q Z / AND 3 GOVT SERV CENTER p 1 0 O "J e GRANDVIE� ' a I '' i � • � � Q F, PARK 1 �> 6' ,a J ©� C S A H� NO 10 Z. Uj i (:)= Node location Kensington light fixture location o Marquette light fixture location �� T TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT STUDY CITY Of WXX BROOKLYN CENTER. MN. s i. jam, _---- - - - - -- - -___- - - - - -- _ _ r• E ¢ e 05 ♦ > y <i 1 r Kensington c Dimensions Standard Recommended Marquette Luminaire Arm Mounting Wattage Size Dimensions Height MARQUETTE 12 up to 12" x 12" x 5 1 x 4" x 8" 7'6" to 12'6" 100 watts MARQUETTE 19 up to 19" x 19" x 8" 2" x 4" x 8" 10' to 25' 250 watts MARQUETTE 25 up to 25" x 25" x 11" 2 x 6" x 12" 20' to 40' 400 watts MARQUETTE 30 up to 30" x 30" x 13 3" x 10" x 14" 25' to 40' 1 000 w atts Mechanical Features - Acrylic or op- Options - Photoelectric control recep- tional polycarbonate refractor. - Opti- tacie - Single or duplex weatherproof cally engineered aluminum reflector. - receptacle - Luminaires can be wall Adjustable lampholder. - Marquette 19 mounted - Polycarbonate refractor • and 25 have sealed reflectors and bal- Baked enamel finish available in a last assembly with quick connect/ wide range of colors, applied electro- disconnect for easy installation and statically. servicing. Photometric Flexibility - 100 to 1000 watts in IES distribution patterns II, III and IV. - Designed and manufactured to meet or exceed UL and NEC re- 1 quirements. All fixtures bear the IBEW and UL label. i 1 � � a I i t RY STERNER 19 SUMMARY OF EARLE BROWN FARM TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT PROJECTS JANUARY 6, 1987 EXPENSE SUMMARY REVENUE SUMMARY PRIVATE MSA MSA PROPERTY PROJECT CONSTRUCTION TECHNICAL ADMIN /LEGAL /INT TOTAL REGULAR LOCAL ASSESSMENT HRA Total Project No. 1 Shingle Creek Parkway $492,621.11 $39,682.73 $10,672.17 $542,976.01 $494,395.27 ($494,395.27) $22,179.37 $520,796.64 $542,976.01 Street Improvements Project No. 2 Brooklyn Farm $122,354.55 $21,606.50 $2,447.10 $146,408.15 $0.00 ($0.00) $125,911.00 $20,497.15 $146,408.15 Storm Sewer System Project No. 3 Streetscape $926,231.00 $64,105.04 $18,524.62 $1,008,860.66 $90,492.47 ($90,492.47) $0.00 $1,008,860.66 $1,008,860.66 Improvements Project No. 4 Earle Brown Commons $115,351.85 $15,719.50 $2,307.04 $133,378.39 $0.00 ($0.00) $13,175.02 $120,203.37 $133,378.39 Utility Improvements Project No. 5 Common Access Road $26,744.00 $0.00 $0.00 $26,744.00 $0.00 ($0.00) $0.00 $26,744.00 $26,744.00 Project No. 6 Earle Brown Farm $587,773.00 $47,021.84 $11,755.46 $646,550.30 $0.00 ($0.00) $0.00 $646,550.30 $646,550.30 Onsite Imporvements Project No. 7 Platting, Planning $0.00 $54,056.85 $0.00 $54,056.85 $0.00 ($0.00) $0.00 $54,056.85 $54,056.85 and Study Costs TOTAL $2,271,075.51 $242,192.46 $45,706.39 $2,558,974.36 $584,887.74 ($584,887.74) $161,265.39 $2,397,708.97 $2,558,974.36 PROJECT NO. 1 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS Item EXPENSES Cost Bituminous Resurfacing 1985 -27 Construction Cost $334,687.60 Technical Services Braun Engineering $1,900.10 Short Elliott Hendrickson $1,651.08 City Staff (9%) $30,121.88 Administration (1 %) $3,346.88 Legal (1%) $3,346.88 Bituminous Resurfacing Subtotal $375,054.42 Shingle Creek Parkway Turnlane 1986 -07 Construction Cost $19,242.90 Technical Services City Staff (9 %) $1,731.86 Administration (1%)) $192.43 Legal (1%)) $192.43 Capitalized Interest $819.75 Turnlane at Target Subtotal $22,179.37 Shingle Creek Parkway Traffic Signals at Summit & John Martin 1985 -20 Construction Cost $138,690.61 Technical Services Short Elliott Hendrickson $4,277.80 Administration (1 %)) $1,386.91 Legal (1G)) $1,386.91 Traffic Signal Subtotal -- $145,74222 TOTAL EXPENSES $542,976.01 REVENUES The following is a summary of proposed revenue sources for this project: 1985 -27 1986 -07 1985 -20 TOTAL Special Assessments to Private Properties $22,179.37 $22,179.37 MSA Accounts $0.00 2600 (Expendable) $0.00 2611 (Restricted Reserve) ($375,054.42) ($22,179.37) ($97,161.48) ($494,395.27) 2613 (State Approved Projects) $375,054.42 $22,179.37 $97,161.48 $494,395.27 Capital Project Fund (Division _) $0.00 Public Utility Fund $0.00 General Fund (Division _) $0.00 HRA $375,054.42 $145,742.22 $520,796.64 TOTAL REVENUES: $375,054.42 $22,179.37 $145,742.22 $542,976.01 Explanation: DATE: January 6, 1987 Completed By: Joe Oster PROJECT NO.1 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS t�. FREEWari BLVD- 5 X X :1 Y � k EMTRIIt jr civic wRO EMr ,� x. SU MMIT DR. crr-f ` ` p , • ti Al j, �'MIQLJBRaRV � GOvr Soft[ ¢ _ •') 2 i 1 TURN LANE.. o AT ARGET •� EAR GR/INOV" BRQ SIGNALS AT `�unar•� so. D JO N H MARTIN DRIV P 0 Na \' O BITUMINOUS RESURFACING �g TURN LANE AT TARGET SIGNALS AT SUMMIT /JOHN MARTIN DR. PROJECT NO. 2 BROOKLYN FARM STORM SEWER SYSTEM EXPENSES Item Storm Sewer System 1986 -08 Cost Construction Cost $122,354.55 Technical Services Westwood Planning - Design $8,750.00 GME $1,156.50 Westwood Planning - Inspection $11,700.00 Administration (1%) $1,223.55 Legal (1%) $1,223.55 TOTAL EXPENSES $146,408.15 REVENUES 0 The following is a summary of proposed revenue sources for this project: Amount Special Assessments to Private Properties $125,911.00 (1) MSA Accounts 2600 (Expendable) 2611 (Restricted Reserve) 2613 (State Approved Projects) Capital Project Fund (Division ) Public Utility Fund General Fund (Division ) HRA $20,497.15 (2) TOTAL REVENUES: $146,408.15 ------ - - - - -- Explanation: (1) Per agreement with Ryan Construction (2) Special Assessments to Earle Brown Farm Properties, to be paid by HRA DATE: January 6, 1987 Completed By: Joe Oster 1 , � � � � .rrrYSrrra leFrrA+, rr<r.+ +rrwr•r 1 �:. r � QQ.r„�Sar''" � ! :i.I i ! tiv. .•ai�- s,.rr:'- r'':[: r.. , ?i �1 { parttpor yA 1 :I. 1 6 : f: .. ...... ......... : {r•..:rtr:rrrrrr r�r:� r .r � A �• � . 1 { ,; 1t'� � + W \ �� .1.• •...�,. •� 1 ` :i �.. r.. r.rr'i rs � r ,,., y S E f j I:. :.� %r rrr , c r :n>:.i'� r - x.rtri�.:wr : •M,' ! I f 7C Tf7 7S z m \ 1 � ` !1 �+ ii,r 111 t •�r� Y tN•,f; w..r.wµ•�rvssl iserrrssarrrrry { r. r.r.•.�:'..Y•.., }.,.....vn...., ✓ , S � � `t i � ~ �'� ' ti y / 1 . .-"'' / . ,,r, ...A,�....�.'• ''4r,4'. i 79 i ,+ 'v'!Y•M ?MaWirM' r r wI ! S� 'I � " . , .; � '••ti t \ i 71 t? I J �a. { .wr .:s. 4.,..0•x' ,r? ...1... t f > w � # I f .'Y" �•'"r"� , J ` ••r. '. 7r:4 � {, %'' f 4 j ' �K %r..e.., r.rw....•:4::::: %� }. • ' • 'rr '''.� . {•.• tin � .i �. �N;pA t1. - �: r ✓ ✓�' r r � : �' •.} '• \ 't .. f i t.� .: �� `}.. f � P�` .�! j} � •`• ; '• ••• �h icy y�: ' r�: ,. JA;, �...,�, ''K..ti ` t • 1 . \ . •',% ! y,: k ' ' 'W r'}Y.y } ✓r . {r,; }'rrX r `4 { :{✓r.• 'rrr (+ �• f'' ti,. � f' : � vk ytt {��,• }✓ :£,' :Y'' , r rr r :''�: }• }•: {r,:: ?;: ?• }^ .. .......' 't.. .: t., ;} r ;;�{' }r r''t�' rrr{ ✓' r. ?:• } ✓+�• �\ .•' �' {2 'r � fr r f' •r•r'• +''' } ?r % }'w}'' 7' ' i i �.w•� +'� i ,,� ti : � •., , ti,, . ,�,r } }• : rr'.: } r .' .✓•::•r,:: }:• .. , w 1 ..: .,,�.....a , `+� � {•:. S }••rr•r v:✓ rrr::•'•.. : � > .r I' � }C�� .,. { ,r'� SS�'?%r r }.fn { f; r? r ,{ r; ..r r r' } ✓r••• i .. ✓ {:.•. ` w ` ! y ' -'� X h, I : � r r �y., �'•'✓'✓:' ;,•• } {;:;:yrir:;r:;i. {y'r!:'::; :•:;::�. �::;:•f ?:•i. Jr' V• A. ' . .... '4.• n �'\ ,•� S' ' ' • •,r'S ? ,y r {dY.r ?. r ✓'•r f JrJ :. ...,. :! ✓' �•; .,,,.' `t � {S'. {,r •i J ? ?., +.; %C;::•} �; r f :}�7 }✓ r; ?.i;:f:;rrj j {:jr, {;j }: : ; � { ,.{ i ' (/!: 1 J . "� '4''/ I j .s L :}.r,r�{t4: " {: }ry } 'k r r : •ti r•'i i ! % .w , '.�f , ..I ';}�' r' f " '4, 1 ; S L' '' { }f% /.'•%yy'.k?: ;v'r: ✓:r; }:{ ?:;': ?4 .. .r. . .. :v }•.,. ? ?::: ww..v,wvr.,.4.w.. �•,ba,*.•i ..• • . � kI \ •f' •t '` ii.' v .,t r {: . /.!•$;t s:,':;:; }: }S;: r:w }$? :• r ?ii:7if..... J ; � ✓ } •�! ,I ' r � . t \ . • t •. t . �. '•r;}, i� ?; {� } ?: ?;:ti: r.,,, +�yr: • �% y:! ::�.y:: ::;•.:•.••• }•.:•.••.; {.: •.;.::•.;•.•.••. +. r ' tee ,,,f ry•e�,i •� t r �' ', r '; , • v:� : •: 1•\ .: }... rY: } ✓..:: ::;: • i. �Y.::::•} �i?:::} :;:::: {:;:;:{ti:::::�:::: {:��ti•. T , t' r f� / 1 � 1 , '1 � y 'ry:. :: ;r tif� :} . , ;� %!fr },• ?yri:::�:% r:;:? � } } }'.: � :: ! ''�' i ' `' t '!. i ' r ... 4, ' L, r:.v'rri ✓ :. ? J�.:• ,r, }; A V / j �fi h � .�• �' °' `i � ' 1 f � �� '1 � '•'1;••', ... .. r }:,•vrrr.,:::::: %. };: ?. � . ) 'I' • •.t. ,• 1 ' 'r'I • } • 5, 7. ': };� .,, +i; rrr rr r rli'� ? ti {•:•i }:r t } j !'" i� 1 ! 4 `', :• < < ti••rr r rrc rr $f.•r7r'r % /vr ✓r.+r O C o � r r 1 J J }' {,.1 1 I' _ t r `, 1 • ` 1 !•Fg �. k� .saf. r*�i, .... ..v < Il .+•w. \ � S ; ,•,• • � �r �, rr` r , w \ 4 ti Y,, t •. •4.4 .. „ . S co Q J �/ } �� y f • �r r . L "`'v Cn 1 ^ 11 ., ••'� • � �• f �r � ! f ' y � i \ • i r �; • y \�'• �'•, 'C'y,4,, , L :�, .. �r i t.J �+� �'' � �;' fb•1 f�r' ri � �1 •�, ' '� r .�'•.,•., ; \y`y t { ''y ' 1' 1 Ci t � . '3 /� r •, I, •��” i t:, O ,'•,.'•.: • . y 5 { ,' ', � ti 5 t� r „� NN r rV• \I� � r. yw..... w• ✓ •." I r, • 4 ' X4'4 r NN�,rh. �. M 'i•4 .. �� 1+�.•. ••+7:,. "t,�/Mw�•.�y{ rr......... r,r w" „ twr•r'i7 i• • Nw w �.. .r•' +... ..a•.A+.rur N r ] '',{ ! ,•.' . ... ` 111 � {f{ I tr.. l• �.�.! / . J �S � ... .� ..,r '•'.,may .. •.. � f � !!; • I � tih, � '•�� , ♦ ! Gv.. _ 1 A M�•t ! 7 1 ,' ' � ti iii � ,� ,• •••"�•'•• ra,.ivvA•.a. . a rxunnvr..rrwArw.4vv.. wrw.•+rw...w.....wr.... �.. 3 PROJECT NO. 3 STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS SCP OTHER EXPENSES NODES SIDEWALK PLANTINGS LIGHTING LIGHTING TOTAL Construction Cost Phase I $63,228.61 $16,941.46 Phase II $1,787.93 $81,958.00 $35,970.25 $13,902.75 $49,873.00 Phase III $265,970.00 $67,548.00 $96,777.00 $83,848.00 $236,007.00 $750,150.00 Phase IV $0.00 $44,250.00 $44,250.00 Technical Services Braun Engineering $2,454.00 $2,454.00 Westwood Planning $1,500.00 $4,200.00 $3,297.51 $9,351.78 $18,349.29 City $23,458.75 $11,487.00 $1,936.00 $1,670.00 $4,750.00 $43,301.75 Administration (12) $3,651.69 $1,426.42 $967.77 $838.48 $2,377.95 $9,262.31 Legal (1Y.) $3,651.69 $1,426.42 $967.77 $838.48 $2,377.95 $9,262.31 TOTAL EXPENSES $399,884.99 $156,982.05 $104,848.54 $90,492.47 $256,652.61 $1,008,860.66 REVENUES The following is a summary of proposed revenue sources for this project: Amount Special Assessments to Private Properties MSA Accounts 2600 (Expendable) 2611 (Restricted Reserve) ($90,492.47) 2613 (State Approved Projects) $90,492.47 Capital Project Fund (Division _) Public Utility Fund - General Fund (Division ) HRA $1,008,860.66 TOTAL REVENUES: $1,008,860.66 Explanation: DATE: January 6, 1987 Completed By: Joe Oster i PROJECT 3 STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT ............... ) ,�, FREEWAYI BLVD. 65 v Oj a TI ll' � X ENTRAL RK,-�'r "' l CITY L ' Cri/1C C R f .. \ o cAROEM \ �^ CITY SUMA4 ' f PARK� / '� CO. ' HENN. o u eRAaY a Q a li ANo GoVr sERV. c 0 0 ti , E; "A eRa GRANOVI J- \ PAR K SC" .Y C • ©° ® PROPOSED NODE PHASE III CSAH J 'NO\10 t \ • COMPLETED NODE PHASE I c UNDER CONST. NODE PHASE 11 COMPLETED SIDEWALK z PROPOSED SIDEWALK PHASE M �= FUTURE SIDEWALK PHASE IV 1 ` VL h SUMM1 k Ic t z �C HENN.COL LBRARYQ� 3 ANO t� .} CiVT SERV CE �. v GRANOVIE' VX \X \ ;A SA NO . 10 SAW � Z (:D= Node location PROJECT NO.3 Kensington light fixture location LIGHTING o-�- -Marquette light fixture lo_ cation y TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT STUDY 3ROOKLYN CENTER. MN. --- --- f— N M et u� ra sa! e t t i - I W :il��}' r E.1 �Itl Ifil llt � �.,�••. , �• � '�'�j, „ , � �t �, f ` t. + h i• 1 T t 1 1 "t I 1 0 Z r i d a 'L C ch Z — .1� � i1 i t . � 1�1 �� . ( =i : . ^' r '� • t' 1 'A��'} ►r1i11 • �,� �� U I) � 1 • 1. , j '-i i 1 1 s: . - tl - � :.Jt '1� /� W v, � n t�, r a tit • s �''- '/� +i� s. t �r � ' O Z Cc Q. f , 11 1 C' *`!�,� •r . '�,. ,.s a ; �'t. -f. 4 1 !'11 t �• I I' #Zt t i 1 -- '' ri \ ` Y , ��,.. !i,i' (� f it I .l tt: _ E � i t � — r � `t :1 T �'`,� L • iii ca • r . 1 •(. {� • �' i ' i: , } ; ,� tr s% 'j4'�r t 1,^ e 't., W G w �/ . t ('"', 1 �' li �L'T�:al , .�"�� ,, i 1 y tt , l if ..0 PROJECT NO. 4 EARLE BROWN COMMONS IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITY CHANGES EXPENSES Item Utility System Changes 1986 -09, 1986 -20 Cost and Future Storm Sewer Relocation Construction Cost Sanitary Sewer (1986 -8) $21,747.00 Sanitary Sewer (1986 -20) $50,245.00 Watermain (1986 -20) $22,719.85 Storm Sewer (Future Relocation) $20,640.00 Technical Services Consultant $8,798.39 City $6,921.11 Administration (1%) $1,153.52 Legal (1%) $1,153.52 TOTAL EXPENSES $133,378.39 REVENUES The following is a summary of proposed revenue sources for this project: Amount Special Assessments to Private Properties $13,175.02 (1) MSA Accounts 2600 (Expendable) 2611 (Restricted Reserve) 2613 (State Approved Projects) Capital Project Fund (Division ) Public Utility Fund General Fund (Division ) HRA $120,203.37 (2) TOTAL REVENUES: $133,378.39 Explanation: (1) 50% of Watermain Project Cost as per agreement with Earle Brown Commons (2) 50% of Watermain Project Cost and 100% of costs for Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Relocation Note: Charges for Sanitary and Storm Sewer costs were included in the land sale transaction agreement with Earle Brown Commons DATE: January 6, 1987 Completed By: Joe Oster r 1, �,,,`•... �� ' ` � is , � M.,1� � � O rf �'' � +eta �. • .. /yam: w °t Rl e � �� l y c at go tt stlt ��.r. ' W o r ' 1 i i�', \ I' ........�,f�n'�4s�;`,;. :J11.... ;b• t�:tt{s:ea,:�:::::o \��fi �: IN CL ll� T , d' 1 11.E 1 „ j , l � '�/ , �� ., (� it ..p •,;.r 1) y.. `•�l I t.pf I I I �'::• f 7 , ' 1 �ti � •�• " � ��,, � I ,.t ,� s'• Via. 1 � I J,w/ ; �'�r •'''•. � , ,. ..w ` �..Iwu.ae��:etct: X : �`• r CC Ile ..N.a . i.. ��. PROJECT NO. 5 COMMON ACCESS ROAD EXPENSES Item Cost Common Access Road Construction Cost (50% of contract cost as per agreement with Ryan Construction) $18,679.00 Landscaping Cost $8,065.00 --------- - - - - -- --------------- TOTAL EXPENSES $26,744.00 --------- - - - - -- --------------- REVENUES The following is a summary of proposed revenue sources for this project: Amount Special Assessments to Private Properties MSA Accounts 2600 (Expendable) 2611 (Restricted Reserve) 2613 (State Approved Projects) Capital Project Fund (Division ) Public Utility Fund General Fund (Division ) HRA $26,744.00 TOTAL REVENUES: $26,744.00 Explanation: HRA share of Common Access Road costs were included in land sale transaction agreement with Earle Brown Commons DATE: January 6, 1987 Completed By: Joe Oster C7 O . � -•< D m D n O m �/ rn CO co / f j �. •. � cn .5U t O il uj .'r A ? : /• 3 11 "6 AIR +'+ti IA it pA STA. +1 +50 �] \ i1. ELEV. 811.16 CO . Q 100 all � �I m PROJECT NO. 6 EARLE BROWN FARM ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS EXPENSES Item Cost Construction Cost Watermain $43,865.00 Sanitary Sewer $28,872.00 Storm Sewer $54,285.00 Grading & Paving $160,751.00 Landscaping, Paths & Special Features $300,000.00 Technical Services (8 %) $47,021.84 Administration (1%) $5,877.73 Legal (1%) $5,877.73 TOTAL EXPENSES $646,550.30 --------- - - - - -- --------------- REVENUES The following is a summary of proposed revenue sources for this project: Amount Special Assessments to Private Properties MSA Accounts 2600 (Expendable) 2611 (Restricted Reserve) 2613 (State Approved Projects) Capital Project Fund (Division ) Public Utility Fund General Fund (Division ) HRA $646,550.30 TOTAL REVENUES: $646,550.30 Explanation: This cost summary anticipates full HRA funding for the entire costs of these improvements, based on the "worst case" scenario that the City will assume total responsibility for developing the Earle Brown site. If an agreement is negotiated for private development of the site, the developer may be required to pay for all, or a portion of these costs; or the agreement may provide for the City to construct some or all of these improvements, then levy special assessments for these costs to the developer. DATE: January 6, 1987 Completed By: Joe Oster e• LL CIL LLJ tow .t ... � � r�. .�l rrr cc co LL. O 0 cc U Lt W LU cr a. = ---- ., r /�, W ..1,. . .. n - *JfOO•:)AL9 , OlilJTIA I d' LL O CO VIC do 0 LL 9 � • G •7 • •.M,a. �w -• •.. r ,r 1 •� �,� ��... �...•� •� �lP Z C cio 0 INN w �, V CL cc �'• „yam. �. +..,... .:.yfy � .s`' 1 d' LL O M W w cc Q cc 4L ION G • ... \ CL cr W ♦ I - / b �i'IJ Zj $KIM K CO r KOl �� ,tf . \ . �•' /'� ,•0 Go A Mf• � PROJECT NO.6 EARLE BROWN FARM GRADING & PAVING or / I R eori ed Road" Far er's ` M r) - et ria p " � etocate o �t I pri 84Idin �r a Bumove i d i a . • I 's � eritag .�.� Censer le U U i� 1 i SHEET 4 OF 4 PROJECT NO. 7 PLATTING, PLANNING & STUDY COSTS EXPENSES Item Total Cost Cost Technical Services Westwood Planning Master Planning $23,176.51 $23,176.51 Suburban Engineering Registered Land Survey No. 1594 $1,393.00 Plat of Brooklyn Farm $2,002.00 Miscellaneous Surveys $950.00 $4,345.00 (1) Hanson Thorpe Pellinen Olson, Inc. Preliminary Platt and Final R.L.S. $8,235.34 Future Platt of Earle Brown Farm $6,500.00 $14,735.34 AEC Enginers Structural Analysis of Earle Brown Farm Buildings $11,800.00 $11,800.00 --------- - - - - -- --------------- TOTAL EXPENSES $54,056.85 REVENUES The following is a summary of proposed revenue sources for this project: Amount Special Assessments to Private Properties MSA Accounts 2600 (Expendable) 2611 (Restricted Reserve) 2613 (State Approved Projects) Capital Project Fund (Division ) Public Utility Fund General Fund (Division ) HRA $54,056.85 TOTAL REVENUES: $54,056.85 Explanation: (1) Total cost for this service was $8698.00, paid by Ryan Construction. The $4345.00 cost shown is the HRA share, paid to Ryan Construction, in accordance with agreement dated 01/02/86 DATE: January 6, 1987 Completed By: Joe Oster i Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -01, RECONDITIONING OF WELLS NO. 4 AND 9, ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND APPROVING CONTRACT THEREFORE WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported to the City Council that it is necessary and in the best interests of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota to recondition Wells No. 4 and 9; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has received proposals for such improvement submitted bids being as follows: Bidder Bid Amount Layne Minnesota Company 14 y P Y $ , 576.00 Keys Well Drilling Company $ 16,891.00 E.H. Renner & Sons $ 19,446.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The following project is hereby established: WELLS NOS. 4 AND 9 RECONDITIONING PROJECT NO. 1987 -01 2. The accounting for Project No. 1987 -01 will be done in the Public Utilities Fund. 3. The proposal of Layne Minnesota Company, in the amount of $14,576.00 is the lowest responsible proposal received and the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said firm in that amount. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF is BROOKLYN 1 : 1 BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 r TELEPHONE 561 -5440 ENTER EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer DATE: January 8, 1987 RE: Report on Reconditioning Wells No. 4 and 9 To assure that the 9 wells which provide the City's water supply are maintained in proper condition, it is necessary to annually inspect 1 or 2 wells, then to recondition them if the inspection indicates a need for such work. Inspection of the wells covers two specific areas; i.e.: (1) inspection of the well casings, columns, motors and pumps, shafts and other mechanical features of the well; and (2) inspection of the cavity at the bottom of the well. Under normal operation, sand from the side of the cavity loosens during times that the pump is operating, then settles to the bottom of the cavity. At some point in time, the amount of said which accumulates at the bottom fills the cavity to a level where some of that sand is picked up during operation of the pumps, entering into the pump and causing erosion of the pump. At or before that time it is necessary to bail out that accumulated sand. This year Wells No. 4 and No. 9 (see attached map) were selected for inspection. Inspection of Well No. 4 showed (1) there is a considerable amount of wear and deterioration of the bearings, and there is a need to replace a small part of the pump shaft; and (2) a considerable amount of sand has sloughed into the cavity and should be bailed out. Inspection of Well No. 9 (our newest well, which has been in operation for 2 years) showed no worn parts. However, as is normal for a new well, the inspection showed that a large volume of sand has sloughed to the bottom of the well and built up to the point where the pumps would be subject to serious erosion if this sand is not bailed out. Accordingly, we have solicited proposals from 3 reputable companies who do this type of work. We recommend award of the contract to the Layne Minnesota Company, the low bidder. "74c .lv� m „ January 8, 1987 Page 2 Based on the proposal submitted by Layne Minnesota we estimate the total costs of this project as follows: Description Quanitity Unit Unit Price Total Mobilization /Demobilization 2 LS $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 Bailing 145 CY 65.00 9,425.00 Line Shaft (SS) 1 EA 145.00 145.00 Paint Pump & Column Shaft 1 LS 650.00 650.00 Rubber Bearings 16 EA 16.00 256.00 Pump Bearing Replacement 1 LS 200.00 200.00 Install Well Pump No. 4 1 LS 950.00 950.00 Install Well Pump No. 9 1 LS 950.00 950.00 TOTAL $14,576.00 Technical Services (9%) 1,300.00 Administration (1 %) 145.00 Legal (1%) 145.00 $16,166.00 It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached "Resolution Establishing Improvement Project No. 1987 -01, Reconditioning of Wells No. 4 and 9, Accepting Proposal and Approving Contract Therefore ". Re OEng submitted, Approved for submittal, ier S Knapp ity n er D irector of Public Works HRS: jn BID TABULATION CONTRACT 1987 -A PROJECT NO. 1987 -01 Engineer's Layne Minnesota KEYS E.H. RENNER Estimate 1 2 3 Item # Contract Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount -- -- ---- --- -- ---- -------- - - - -- -- - - -- - --- - - -- ---- -- - - -- -- - - ------ --- - - - - - -- -- --- - - - - -- - --- - - - --- --- - - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- -- -- - - - - -- 1 MOBILIZATION /DEMOBILIZATION LS 2 1000.00 2000.00 1000.00 2000.00 1500.00 3000.00 750.00 1500.00 2 BAILING CY 145 60.00 8700.00 65.00 9425.00 75.00 10875.00 90.00 13050.00 3 1 1/2" X 5' LINE SHAFT (SS) EA 1 180.00 180.00 145.00 145.00 140.00 140.00 200.00 200.00 4 SDBLST 6 COAT PUMP /COL /SHAFT LS 1 1000.00 1000.00 650.00 650.00 550.00 550.00 1650.00 1650.00 5 RUBBER BEARINGS EA 16 18.00 288.00 16.00 256.00 16.00 256.00 16.00 256.00 6 DEEP WELL PUMP BEARING REPLACE LS 1 250.00 250.00 200.00 200.00 220.00 220.00 340.00 340.00 7 INSTALL DEEP WELL PUMP NO. 4 LS 1 1000.00 1000.00 950.00 950.00 800.00 800.00 1250.00 1250.00 8 INSTALL DEEP WELL PUMP NO. 9 LS 1 1200.00 1200.00 950.00 950.00 1050.00 1050.00 1200.00 1200.00 - --- -- - ---- - ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - - -- ----- -- - - -- $14,618.00 $14,576.00 $16,891.00 $19,446.00 1' F 4 11 AVE N G W a a a u —� - + 73R0 AVE. N z = 0068INE L NE W �( AN W u WELL I I i > W I� a a Ko.e 0 E N 4V 9 i ir a 172ND AVE.N _ANE �.'NX • �1 TTM 72ND EVERGREE RIVERDAtE 4VE E N N = X `PARK wOLt.. M0 i PA z o T �CX`!�(� 71ST AVE. N EVERGREEN L C = ao W W SCNOOI x'`�'`�i / / I / / 70TH AVE. N wat. kas W MAINTENANCE a ANNEX WE 3 o r � I EME SON • 4T ER NQ 6 C. S. A.M. TOWER 40. 130 3 �� fl 69TH AVE. 35 +i AVE. f r WELL l o cc c I— x a 1 o LL Q W H 68TH AVE.N > 67TH J AVE. 67TH AVE. MROOKLTN CENTER NIGH SCHOOL \ IREH 66 I T`H AVE.I 1 FOUSE \ ' �f YX ZARK \ srA. k l� \\ � 65TH AVE. d BLVD. 65TH AVE. _N. z a o M W W 6 J y 2 O U m 0 _J C ! 1 1 64TH � AVE. h v ' 1 I n ifa 63RD AVE. h Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -02, RECONDITIONING OF WATER TOWER NO. 1, AND APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RELATING THERETO BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The proposal submitted by AEC Engineers and Designers to provide professional engineering services relating to the inspection and reconditioning of Water Tower No. 1, located at 69th Avenue North and France Avenue North, at a total estimated cost of $8,250 is hereby accepted. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with AEC Engineers and Designers for said services. 2. The following project is hereby established: WATER TOWER NO. 1 RECONDITIONING PROJECT NO. 1987 -02 3. The accounting for Project No. 1987 -02 will be done in the Public Utilities Fund. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: .and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF B R OKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTER EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works FROM: H. R. Spurrier, City Engineer DATE: January 8, 1987 RE: Reconditioning of Water Tower No. 1 Improvement Project No. 1987 -02 Attached are the proposals from AEC Engineers and Designers for the professional engineering services relating to the inspection and reconditioning of Water Tower No. 1. The work anticipates that the consultants will handle the work on a "turnkey" basis from the inspection to the inspection of the completed work. This work completes water tower reconditioning for the City's 3 water towers. Based on earlier inspections we expect only the exterior will require recoating. If only the exterior must be recoated the estimated cost of the work will be less than $75,000.00. The inspection report AEC prepares will more accurately discuss the estimated costs. AEC Engineers and Designers has been the City's consultant for all of the previous reconditioning work and we are satisfied with their work products and recommend approval of the attached resolution, a "Resolution Establishing Improvement Project No. 1987 -02, Reconditioning of Water Tower No. 1, and Approving Agreement for Professional Services Relating Thereto ". 4 R 's ec f submitted, Approved for submittal, R ur 'er Sy Knapp t gene r Director of Public Works HRS : j n 511 Eleventh Avenue South AEC- ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS Minneapolis, Minnesota 5 612/332 -8905 December 22, 1986 Mr. Bo Spurrier City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Subject: Proposal to inspect the condition of the 500 MG Elevated Water Tower at 69 Avenue and France Avenue North Dear Mr. Spurrier: As we discussed it over the telephone, I am pleased to submit this proposal to inspect the referenced water tower. We could do the inspection during the week of December 29, 1986. The inspection will be performed in conformance with the applicable sections of the enclosed "Structural and Coating Evaluation Procedures For Steel Water Storage Tanks." At the completion of the inspection, we will submit a certified inspection report. The tank exterior will be visually examined from locations accessible without scaffolding or additional rigging. The tank inspection will be done on a time and materials basis in conformance with the enclosed Fee Schedule. We anticipate that the total inspection charges will not exceed $1,250.00, including the Certified Inspection Report. The Inspection Report will include color photographs of the conditions discovered during the inspection, as well as a cost estimate of any work required. Two copies of the report will be submitted. If you find this proposal acceptable, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided and return to us. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, AEC - ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS Accepted this 29th day of December 19 86 o r City of Brooklyn Center John R. Buzek, P. E. By: President Officer - City 11anager Enc. Recommended by: Director of Public Works 511 Eleventh Avenue South A E C - ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 612/332 -8905 December 22, 1986 Mr. Bo Spurrier City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Subject: Proposal to inspect the condition of the 500 MG Elevated Water Tower at 69 Avenue and France Avenue North Dear Mr. Spurrier: As we discussed it over the telephone, I am pleased to submit this proposal to inspect the referenced water tower. We could do the inspection during the week of December 29, 1986. The inspection will be performed in conformance with the applicable sections of the enclosed "Structural and Coating Evaluation Procedures For Steel Water Storage Tanks." At the completion of the inspection, we will submit a certified inspection report. The tank exterior will be visually examined from locations accessible without scaffolding or additional rigging. The tank inspection will be done on a time and materials basis in conformance with the enclosed Fee Schedule. We anticipate that the total inspection charges will not exceed $1,250.00, including the Certified Inspection Report. The Inspection Report will include color photographs of the conditions discovered during the inspection, as well as a cost estimate of any work required. Two copies of the report will be submitted. If you find this proposal acceptable, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided and return to us. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, AEC - ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS Accepted this 29th day o �z �-� � of December 19 86 City of Brooklyn Center John R. Buzek, P. E. By: President Officer - City 11anager Enc. Recommended by: Director of Public works AEC ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS 511 Eleventh Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 612/332 -8905 STRUCTURAL AND COATING EVALUATION PROCEDURES FCR STEEL WATER STORAGE TANKS This document outlines the AEC procedures, standards and requirements for inspecting steel water storage tanks. QUALIFICATIONS AEC is an engineering organization whose principals are registered professional engineers, specializing in inspection services and having at least five years of experience in the inspection of steel structures. The inspectors assigned to the work in the field have been properly trained by AEC. They either have, or work directly under the supervision of an inspector who has at least five years of experience in the inspection of coatings and steel structures. The inspectors have no interest, other than that of a competent inspector, in the performance of any work under consideration at the time the inspection is made. METHOD AND DURATION OF THE INSPECTION The interior inspection is normally done by two individuals floating in rafts for however long it takes to drain the tank. The third individual, usually provided by the municipality, is on top of the tank or nearby to assist the two men inside the tank. Usually, the interior can be inspected in one day. The exterior inspection is limited to areas accessible without scaffolding, or additional rigging. INSPECTION REPORT All inspection findings are thoroughly documented in writing and with color photography to verify the inspection results. Future maintenance or the removal and replacement of a failed coating system is dependent on the factual reporting of the inspection results. Two copies of the Inspection Report are submitted. The report is certified by a registered rofessional engineer. P g If repairs or painting are indicated, the report will clearly specify the type and extent recommended. The report also includes a cost estimate and a construction schedule for any repair work. It is understood that copies of the inspection report may be made available by the city to the painting or tank repair contractors to define the condition of the tank if bids for repair or painting are desired. INSPECTION STANDARDS The inspection work will conform to the requirements of AWWA -D101, the Steel Structures Painting Council (SSPC), National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE), American National Standards Institute (ANSI), and the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). STRUCTURAL EVALUATION As a minimum, the structural examination addressess the following items: 1) Tightness and extent of rusting of the anchor bolts. 2) Condition of the column base plates. 3) Condition of the support columns: rusting, out of alignment, etc. 4) Indication of any foundation settlement. 5) Condition of the tie rods: are they in good adjustment and well tuned up, is there any rusting? 6) Examination of pins for the presence of cotterpins. 7) Condition of the center riser pipe. a) Is it straight? b) Are the stayrods in good condition? c) Is the spiral stairway r caged lad der s safe Y g ladder( s) e and in good condition? d) Any indication of leakage in the riser pipe? 8) Condition of the balcony a) Is it structurally safe? b) Is it in good condition or badly corroded? c) Amount of rust on the balcony floor and hand rails? 9) Any bolts missing in the spliced connections of the tower, struts and balcony. Any broken welds. AEC - 2 - c 10) Rivets Examination - report by selecting, scaling, and examining suitable areas, the conditions of the rivets at lap joints and post connections. 11) Tank Metal Examination - a) The condition of the metal between the rivets at the laps and at post connections in selected areas. b) Spot thickness readings with an ultrasonic thickness gage to determine the extent of any metal loss from corrosion. Pit depth readings with a pit depth gage. The extent of any corrosion or pitting found will be described both as to location and character. c) Examination of the tank bottom for signs of deterioration because of its having been covered with mud and scale. d) The condition of the compression ring, spider rods, and supporting roof stuctural. e) The finial connection and /or tank vent. Is it structurally solid and safe for the attachment of the painter's rigging? COATING EVALUATION The coating report addresses the condition of the coating and the base metal on the interior and exterior of the tank. The following items are evaluated: 1) An approximation of percent of rusted areas. 2) Special locations of such rust areas if segregated. 3) Character of such rust areas - whether light, moderate or severe corrosion. 4) An evaluation of the adhesion of coating to the substrate (steel). 5) An evaluation of the cohesion of the coating. 6) An evaluation of the adhesion between coats of the coating. 7) An examination of the condition of the steel substrate under the coating. AEC - 3 _ 4� 8 An evaluation of the serviceability or expected cte d P remaining life of the coating, and /or repairability of the coating. The exterior inspection is limited to areas accessible from the tank roof, catwalk k 1 and ladders without additional scaffolding or rigging. COATING TEST METHODS AND PROCEDURES The following test methods may be used to evaluate the coatings: 1) Adhesion Testing The adhesion test may consist of one or more of the following: a) SSPC - Pen knife subjective coating adhesion evaluation. b) ASTM D2197 - Test for adhesion of organic coatings. Elcometer adhesion test. Instrumentation testing of the tensile adhesion strength in PSI of coatings to the substrate. Location of frequency of testing is determined by the inspector. C) ASTM D 3359 - Shear Adhesion Test, measuring adhesion by tape test. Location and frequency of testing is determined by the inspector. 2. Cohesion Testing Evaluation of coating cohesion and adhesion between coats is accomplished during field adhesion testing as outlined above in adhesion testing. 3. Substrate examination and evaluation. The test methods are as described in the Steel Structures Painting Council Manual. 1) SSPC - Tooke gage examination (examination via 50x internal microscope). 2) SSPC - Coating inspection requirements, specifies use of a minimum 30x power, pocket -sized microscope to examine coatings in field evaluations. 4) Dry film thickness testing. The gages which may be employed are: AEC _ 4 _ a) SSPC - PA2, SSPC Method for Measurement of Dry Film Thickness with Magnetic Gages, Type 1 gages. b) SSPC - PA2, Type 2 gage, fixed probe magnetic flux gages. 5) Coating Cure Evaluation ASTM D1640 Coating Cure Evaluaton, is specified as a recommended field method. Field evaluation of coating cure is generally difficult because there are no universally reliable field tests for such purposes. Solvent rub tests, sandpaper tests, and microscopic examination can be utilized in field testing. If field testing results are inconclusive the inspector can recommend that coating samples be taken for extensive laboratory analysis. 6) Coating Serviceability Evaluation Estimated coating life or serviceability evaluations require the use of a wide variety of inspection instruments to determine the adequacy of coating continuity for the service intended. Instrument inspection must be combined with a thorough, total, close visual inspection of all areas of the interior coating for detection of holidays (misses), skips, runs, sags, surface contaminants, overspray, dry spray and any other defects objectionable for the service required. 5262L -M AEC - - 5 AEC ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS 5 Eleventh Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 612/332 -8905 FEE SCHEDULE Engineering $60.00 /hour Estimating 45.00 /hour Technician 35.00 /hour Inspector 35.00 /hour Drafting 25.00 /hour Clerical 20.00 /hour The above rates are based on standard working hours. Reimbursable Expenses The following expenses are reimbursable to AEC: 1. Expenses of transportation and living when traveling in connection with a project. Personal or company automobile = 30¢ /mile 2. Travel time -- billed at labor rates above, with a maximum of eight hours per day 3. Long- distance calls, telegrams /telegraphs, express mail 4. Computer charges 5. Duplicating costs /office supplies 6. Outside consulting services 7. Project- related expenses such as equipment rental Billing Invoices are issued on a monthly basis. Payment terms are net 30 days. Invoices not aid within in 30 days will cart a char percent y e of 1.5 g P per month on the unpaid balance. Effective date: February 1, 1985 3621) -M 511 Eleventh Avenue South AEC- ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 612/332 -8905 December 22, 1986 Mr. Bo Spurrier City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Subject: Proposal to: a. Prepare new painting and repair specifications, evaluate proposals, and recommend a contractor b. Inspect the work of the successful bidder 500 MG Elevated Water Tower at 69 Avenue and France Avenue North Dear Mr. Spurrier: We are pleased to submit this proposal for our engineering and inspection services on your 500 MG Elevated Water Tower. Our services will consist of the following: a. Prepare Engineering Specifications, evaluate proposals, and recommend a painting contractor The specifications will include items such as: • Instruction to bidders. • Proposal forms. • Project specifications, including: scope of work, workmanship, paint materials, health and sanitary facilties, starting date, completion date, and liquidated damages, guarantee, payment. • General conditions, including the authority of the engineer, arbitration, right of owner to terminate contract, extensions of time, insurance, etc.' • Copy of the AEC Inspection Report. AEC will advertise the project, issue the specifications to prospective bid - ders, evaluate the proposals, and recommend a qualified contractor. AEC will provide this service for a flat fee of $2,400.00. December 22, 1986 Mr. Bo Spurrier Page 2 b. Inspect the work of the successful coating bidder As a minimum, the coating inspection will involve the following: • A preconstruction meeting with the client and the paint contractor to clearly define our role and objectives, and to discuss the specifications for understanding and compliance by the contractor. Confirm that the engineer will use the contractor's rigging as required to perform the quality control inspection work. The inspector is authorized by the speci- fications to stop sandblasting or painting, and that there should be a clear understanding that these operations cannot proceed past the specified inspection points. Failure by the contractor to adhere to the specifica- tions will require that areas rejected be reworked. • Inspection of the blasting media and blasting equipment to prevent the tank shell from contamination with moisture and oil. • Check tank ventilation and safety precautions. • Monitor the coating application for conformance with manufacturer's recommendation and good painting practices. Pay close attention to the painting methods of limited access areas. • Temperature and humidity monitoring, and if necessary, stopping the coating work. • Record the painter's progress for compliance with the completion schedule. • Submittal of weekly progress reports. • Authorizing progress payments. The duration of the painting inspection depends on the time it takes the con - tractor to paint the structure. Under normal circumstances, one AEC inspector is at the site for about one -half of the time that the contractor is there. The AEC fee for the painting inspection will be on a time and materials basis in conformance with the enclosed Fee Schedule. Based on a four -week painting schedule, we anticipate that our fees will not exceed $4,600.00. By acting as your Project Engineer, we will handle the work on a "turnkey" basis. We will insure that the coating system is applied in conformance with specifica- tions. This will extend the life of the coating, which represents a considerable savings in the tank maintenance costs and eliminates a substantial amount of future downtime. AEC December 22, 1986 Mr. Bo Spurrier Page 3 If you find this proposal acceptable, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided and return to us. Sincerely, AEC - ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS Accepted this _ day of 19 p� / City of Brooklyn Center — u n R. Buzek, P. E. By: President Officer Enc. AEC 511 Eleventh Avenue South AEC- ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 612/332 -8905 December 22, 1986 Mr. Bo Spurrier City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Subject: Proposal to: a. Prepare new painting and repair specifications, evaluate proposals, and recommend a contractor b. Inspect the work of the successful bidder 500 MG Elevated Water Tower at 69 Avenue and France Avenue North Dear Mr. Spurrier: We are pleased to submit this proposal for our engineering and inspection services on your 500 MG Elevated Water Tower. Our services will consist of the following: a. Prepare Engineering Specifications, evaluate proposals, and recommend a painting contractor The specifications will include items such as: • Instruction to bidders. • Proposal forms. • Project specifications, including: scope of work, workmanship, paint materials, health and sanitary facilties, starting date, completion date, and liquidated damages, guarantee, payment. • General conditions, including the authority of the engineer, arbitration, right of owner to terminate contract, extensions of time, insurance, etc. • Copy of the AEC Inspection Report. AEC will advertise the project, issue the specifications to prospective bid- ders, evaluate the proposals, and recommend a qualified contractor. AEC will provide this service for a flat fee of $2,400.00. December 22, 1986 Mr. Bo Spurrier Page 2 b. Inspect the work of the successful coating bidder As a minimum, the coating inspection will involve the following: • A preconstruction meeting with the client and the paint contractor to clearly define our role and objectives, and to discuss the specifications for understanding and compliance by the contractor. Confirm that the engineer will use the contractor's rigging as required to perform the quality control inspection work. The inspector is authorized by the speci- fications to stop sandblasting or painting, and that there should be a clear understanding that these operations cannot proceed past the specified inspection points. Failure by the contractor to adhere to the specifica- tions will require that areas rejected be reworked. • Inspection of the blasting media and blasting equipment to prevent the tank shell from contamination with moisture and oil. • Check tank ventilation and safety precautions. • Monitor the coating application for conformance with manufacturer's recommendation and good painting practices. Pay close attention to the painting methods of limited access areas. • Temperature and humidity monitoring, and if necessary, stopping the coating work. • Record the painter's progress for compliance with the completion schedule. • Submittal of weekly progress reports. • Authorizing progress payments. The duration of the painting inspection depends on the time it takes the con- tractor to paint the structure. Under normal circumstances, one AEC inspector is at the site for about one -half of the time that the contractor is there. The AEC fee for the painting inspection will be on a time and materials basis in conformance with the enclosed Fee Schedule. Based on a four -week painting schedule, we anticipate that our fees will not exceed $4,600.00. By acting as your Project Engineer, we will handle the work on a "turnkey" basis. We will insure that the coating system is applied in conformance with specifica- tions. This will extend the life of the coating, which represents a considerable savings in the tank maintenance costs and eliminates a substantial amount of future downtime. AEC December 22, 1986 . Mr. Bo Spurrier Page 3 If you find this proposal acceptable, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided and return to us. Sincerely, AEC - ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS Accepted this _ day of 19 Z lin City of Brooklyn CPn;ei . Buzek, P. E. By: _ President Officer Enc. I AEC AE 511 Eleventh Avenue South EC — ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 612/332 -8905 FEE SCHEDULE Engineering $60.00 /hour Technician $37.00 /hour Inspector $37.00 /hour Drafting $25.00 /hour Clerical $20.00 /hour The above rates are based on standard working hours. Reimbursable Expenses The following expenses are reimbursable to AEC: 1. Expenses of transportation and living when traveling in connec- tion with a project. Personal or company automobile = 30¢ /mile. 2. Travel time - billed at labor rates above, with a maximum of eight hours per day. 3. Long distance calls, telegrams /telegraph, express mail. 4. Computer charges. 5. Duplicating costs /office supplies. 6. Outside consulting services. 7. Project related expenses, such as equipment rental. Billing Invoices are issued on a monthly basis. Payment terms are net 30 days. Invoices not paid within 30 days will carry a charge of 1.5 percent per month on the unpaid balance. Effective date: January 1, 1987 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -03, INSTALLATION OF A WATER MAIN FROM LIONS PARK TO THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD 10 AND SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY, ORDERING PREPARATION OF A REPORT THEREON, AND APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO CONDUCT A SOILS INVESTIGATION RELATING THERETO BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1. The following project is hereby established: BROOKDALE 16 INCH WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -03 2. The accounting for Project No. 1987 -03 will be done in the Public Utilities Fund. 3. The proposed project is referred to the City Engineer for study. The City Engineer is instructed to report to the Council will all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible, whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvements, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. 4. The proposal submitted by Braun Engineering and Testing, Inc. to provide professional engineering services related to soils investigation along the watermain alignment at an estimated total cost of $2,930.00 is hereby accepted. The Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Braun Engineering and Testing, Inc. for said services. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF :BR OOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTER EMERGENCY- POLICE - FIRE 911 TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer DATE: January 8, 1987 RE: Brookdale Watermain The property adjacent and east of Brookdale between County Road 10 and T.H. 100 is being redeveloped for the construction of a Mainstreet department store. The 1980 report on waterworks improvements prepared by Black & Veatch recommends the construction of a watermain in the vicinity of this property being redeveloped. The redevelopment provides a narrow window of opportunity in which the City could install the improvement needed for water system integrity at a time when restoration costs would be at a minimum. In order to time the watermain improvement with site development the City would have to move quickly to prepare plans and specifications for the project. The attached resolution initiates the predesign process which would enable the City to time potential development with site redevelopment. It is therefore recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution, a "Resolution Establishing Improvement Project No. 1987 -03, Installation of a Water Main from Lions Park to the Intersection of County Road 10 and Shingle Creek Parkway, Ordering Preparation of a Report Thereon, and Approving Agreement for Professional Services to Conduct a Soils Investigation Relating Thereto ". Respectful b fitted, Approve ,. submittal, H.R. Spur ier Sy Knapp City Engineer Director of Public Works HRS : j n ,• 7lce .So�cetici.cy nl are L� „ Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR YEAR XII AND TO HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR A CONSIDERATION AS PART OF THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has executed a cooperation agreement with Hennepin County agreeing to participate in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Program; and WHEREAS, the three year Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan has been prepared consistent with the Comprehensive Urban Hennepin County Community Development strategy and the Community Development Program regulations; and WHEREAS, the three year Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan has been subject to citizen review pursuant to the Urban Hennepin County Citizen Participation Plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center approve the amendments to program Year XII as follows: Year XII Project Rehab Private Project #22001 $18,000 Year XII Total $18,000 That the above project #22001 in the amount of $18,000 be reprogrammed for the demolition of 1500 - 55th Avenue North. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Brad Hoffman, HRA Coordinator DATE: January 9, 1987 SUBJECT: CDBG The resolution before the City Council will transfer $18,000 of Community Development Funds from Year XII monies, currently proposed for housing ehab and direct their g use for the demolition of 1500 - 55th Avenue North. The Citizens Advisory Committee held a public hearing on Monday, January 5, 1987 and have recommended that the program be initiated and funded through this transfer. Upon approval of the fund transfer, we will solicit bids and the removal of the building will take place upon final approval of our proposal. Because this is a rather straightforward project and not an uncommon use of such monies, approval should not take i long. I would anticipate that the actual cost of this project will be considerably less; however, I am somewhat concerned that the three 3 b' ( ) ids that were earlier rejected were skewed. There were two (2) bids at approximately $17,000, and the low bid at $10,400. I know the high bidders to be experienced and knowledgeable contractors. Overall the amount programmed should be more than adequate with the balance being transferred back to another project at a future date. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1987 GENERAL FUND BUDGET WHEREAS, Section 7.09 of the City Charter of the City of Brooklyn Center does provide for a contingency appropriation as a part of the General Fund Budget, and further provides that the contingency appropriation may be transferred to any other appropriation by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center Fire Department has determined that 30 sets of turn -out gear must be replaced in order to meet OSHA standards; and and WHEREAS, the cost of replacing such equipment is $10,500; WHEREAS, the Fire Department has reported that their Canon F -1 CAmeras has been stolen and should be replaced; and WHEREAS, the cost of replacing this camera is $600; and WHEREAS, the cost of replacing the turn -out gear and camera was not provided for in the 1987 General Fund Budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to amend the 1987 General Fund Budget as follows: Increase the Appropriation for the following line item: Fire Protection` Other Equipment Capital Outlay Account No. 01- 4552- 139 -32 by $13,100 Decrease the Appropriation for the following line item: Unallocated Departmental Expenses Contingency Account No. 01 -4995- 000-80 by $13,100 Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and - adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF I:BROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, _MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE C ENTER 911 MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Ronald Boman, Fire Chief DATE: December 18 1986 SUBJECT: Fire Department Turn -out Gear During the OSHA inspection of the Fire Department, Chief Cahlander was informed that only those coats and bunker pants (turn -out gear) that have been OSHA approved can be worn. The inspector did not look at every set of gear therefore, Chief Cahlander has inspected all the turn -out gear and has found that most of the department's turnout gear does not meet the minimum standards. The Department has 30 sets of gear that do not meet the standards set by OSHA. The cost of replacing this gear is $350 per set or a total cost of $10,500. It is my opinion that with this knowledge the City could have some additional liability if a firefighter were burned or injured while wearing this gear. „ Ilse .Soketlsucq �t a ae �� „ CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF I:BROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 EMERGENCY- POLICE - FIRE C ENTER 911 MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Ronald Boman, Fire Chief DATE: December 18, 1986 SUBJECT: Stolen Camera The Fire Department's Canon F -1 Camera has been stolen. This camera is used at all fires for taking pictures. It was used during the Fire Department's open house and I believe it may have been stolen at this time. I would like to replace this camera as we do not have a camera available to use at this time. "?4e —56*ft&4eoq Mau &t. t Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AWARDING INSURANCE CONTRACTS WHEREAS, the Director of Finance has negotiated annual renewal premiums for the City's property, liability, workers' compensation, liquor liability, boiler and machinery, and other insurance coverages, and they are as follows: League of Minnesota Cities insurance Trust (LMCIT): Property $ 20,981 Inland Marine 6,407 General Liability 45,431 Errors and Omissions 12,236 Automobile Liability 29,479 UM /UIM 1,066 Automobile Physical Damage 11,979 Bonds 3,797 Workers' Compensation 141,092 $272,468 Transcontinental Insurance Company: Liquor Liability (Off -Sale) $ 22,000 The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance Co. Boiler and Machinery $ 2,099 Total $ 296,567 ; and WHERAS, The City Council has committed its support to the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Program to encourage competition in the Municipal insurance market and has determined that this competition has and will continue to result in insurance cost savings to Brooklyn Center and all Minnesota cities in future years; and WHEREAS, the renewal proposals for the liquor liability and boiler and machinery coverages are the only proposals currently available. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to accept the negotiated insurance renewals and award contracts as stated; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Jerome Coughlin Agency be designated as the agent of record for said insurance coverages. Resolution No. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. II I Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING GIFT WHEREAS, the BROOKLYN CENTER LIONS CLUB has presented the City a gift of one thousand dollars ($1,000) and has designated that it be used for the Entertainment in the Parks program; and WHEREAS, the City Council is appreciative of the gift and commends the Brooklyn Center Lions Club for its civic efforts: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to acknowledge the gift with gratitude; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the gift of $1,000.00 be appropriated to the General Fund General Recreation Budget to be used to provide one night of entertainment within the Entertainment in the Parks program. Date '"' Mayor -- ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. /SN Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING GIFT WHEREAS, the BROOKLYN CENTER ROTARY CLUB has presented the City a gift of eight hundred dollars ($800) and has designated that it be used for the purchase of flowers for the Central Park Plaza; and WHEREAS, the City Council is appreciative of the gift and commends the Brooklyn Center Rotary Club for its civic efforts: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to acknowledge the gift with gratitude; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the gift of $800.00 be appropriated to the General Fund Parks Maintenance Budget to be used to purchase flowers for the Central Park Plaza. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE ACHIEVEMENT OF REVEREND ANTONI S. BURY WHEREAS, over a five year period, Reverend Antoni S. Bury, 1621 University Avenue NE, Minneapolis, Minnesota, has swam 500 miles in the Brooklyn Center pool; and WHEREAS, this achievement reflects the dedication, skill and perseverance of Reverend Bury; and WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that the City Council recognizes his accomplishment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the achievement of Reverend Antoni S. Bury is recognized and he is hereby congratulated by the Brooklyn Center City Council. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the followin g voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following 40 resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION GRANTING A BANK OF SICK LEAVE TO MARVIN HONDL WHEREAS, Mr. Marvin Hondl has been selected as the new Engineering Technician III; and WHEREAS, Mr. Hondl will begin employment with the City of Brooklyn Center on January 21, 1987; and WHEREAS, it is desirable to grant Mr. Hondl a bank of sick leave hours. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Mr. Marvin Hondl, as Engineering Technician III with the City, be granted 100 hours of sick leave, which can be used during the first year of employment, but which must be earned according to the City personnel ordinance before additional hours accrue. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the foregoing of the adoption p resolution was duly seconded b member g y ember , and upon vote being taken p g thereon the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Geralyn R. Barone, Personnel Coordinator DATE: January 8, 1987 SUBJECT: Sick Leave for Mr. Marvin Hondl Mr. Marvin Hondl will begin employment with the City of Brooklyn Center as Engineering Technician III on January 21, 1987. Attached is a resolution granting Mr. Hondl a bank of sick leave which can be used in his first year of employment, but which must also be earned according to the Personnel Ordinance, Chapter 17 before additional hours accrue. This is a practice the City Council has approved of in the past. Councilmember Theis has suggested that such a policy practice be put in writing. I will be preparing an amendment to the Personnel Ordinance which would allow the City Manager to handle cases such as this. The amendment will be placed before the City Council shortly. /-5 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REQUESTING IMPROVEMENTS ON COUNTY ROAD 10 ADJACENT TO BROOKDALE SHOPPING CENTER WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has conducted a traffic analysis of this segment of roadway and other roadways within Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, Brooklyn Center has observed traffic patterns during the heavy traffic periods and substantial traffic delays have been noted on County Road 10 adjacent to Brookdale during peak Christmas tmas shopping season and on a regular basis throughout the y ear; and WHEREAS, the major factor causing these delays appears to be an overloading of the turning lanes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the City requests Hennepin County consider as a high priority in 1987 improvements which will increase turning lane capacities and other system improvements on County Road 10 between Brooklyn Boulevard and Logan Avenue which will enhance the ability of County Road 10 to carry traffic. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. a Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO 1986 -05 i WHEREAS, Resolution No. 86 -196 adopted the 8th day of December, 1986, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed acquisition of right of way for the establishment of Grimes Avenue North between Lakebreeze Avenue and the South line of the North one half (Nl /2) of Section 10, Township 11, Range 21; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing of the required notice was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 12th day of January, 1987, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in Council Resolution No. 86 -196 adopted on the 8th day of December, 1986. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. r CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 BRO OKLYN TELEPHONE 561 -5440 ENTER EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 1 911 FEASIBILITY REPORT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -05 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Street Improvement Project No. 1986 -05 provides for the acquisition of Right of Way to allow the future construction of a public roadway (proposed to be Grimes Avenue North) lying between France Avenue North and Azelia Avenue North and between Lakebreeze Avenue North and the South line of the North one half of Section 10, Township 118, Range 21 West. DISCUSSION The sole purpose for proceeding with this improvement is to provide a suitable public access roadway to the property now owned by the Joslyn Corporation which lies South of the Soo Line Railroad right of way in the North one half of Section 10. This property does now abut public roadways at the following locations: at France Avenue North immediately South of the France Avenue /Soo Line Railroad crossing at the dead end of Azelia Avenue North, North of Lakebreeze Avenue at the dead end of Lakeview Avenue North, North of Lakebreeze Avenue at the dead end North of Twin Lake Avenue North, North of Lakebreeze Avenue. It is the opinion of the City staff that none of these access points provide a suitable public access to accommodate future redevelopment of the Joslyn Corporation property. Specifically, the France Avenue access point is much too close to the Soo Line Railroad crossing to allow a safe access point to be . developed, and each of the other three access points are residential streets which are unsuitable for the purpose of carrying the anticipated future volumes of traffic resulting from future redevelopment of the Joslyn property. By providing a new access between France Avenue and Azelia Avenue, traffic generated by the future redevelopment of the Joslyn property would have access to Lakebreeze and to Trunk Highway 100 via a roadway through a developed commercial /industrial area. i s „ 74 So.kttlu.rg �t atc L r December 4, 1986 Page 2 The City has obtained options for the purpose of acquiring this proposed right of way from the two properties involved, ie. Dale Properties, and the Normandale Tennis Clubs, Inc. The option agreements provide that if the City exercises those options, the City will assume the responsibility of replatting these properties in addition to payment for the value of the property to be used as right of way. The option agreements also provide that no special assessments be levied against the two property grantors, either for the right of way acquisition or for the future roadway construction. COST ESTIMATE AND FUNDING A summary of the estimated project costs is as follows: Land Acquisition Price (based on existing option agreements) $ 47,077.10 Estimated Platting Cost 5.222.90 Estimated Total Cost $ 52,300.00 It is recommended that the total cost of this improvement be levied as a special assessment against the property owned by the Joslyn Corporation which is described as follows: That part of the North one half (N 1/2) of Section 10, Township 118, Range 21 which lies South of the Soo Line Railroad right of way, between Twin Lake and France Avenue North. It is recommended that construction financing for this improvement be provided by authorizing the issuance of a Master Note. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The improvement as described is feasible under the conditions outlined and at the cost estimated. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution commencing proceedings on the project, accepting this report, and calling for a hearing on the proposed improvement. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date: December 4, 1986 Registration No. 6242 � - 1 y 51ST. AVE. N. c� S w 3 r - 0 O V W 0= � Z- < O NF � R R p — PROPOSED ROADWAY 4 W w > Q a a i LAKE BREEZE AVE. t W � w v l w _ _ _ _ _ _ 48TH AVE. N r LAKESIDE AVE. x . CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TWIN LAKE Q; BEACH LOCATION MAP SHOWING PROPOSED Za PARK LOCATION FOR GRIMES AVENUE RIGHT OF WAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS I -O5 (O Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXERCISE OPTIONS FOR PURCHASE OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -05 WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has obtained two option agreements for the purpose of allowing the purchase of right of way for the future establishment of Grimes Avenue North between Lakebreeze Avenue and the South line of the North one half (Nl /2) of Section 10, T118, R21; and WHEREAS, the City Council has proposed to proceed with the acquisition of said property under authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111 and _ under Improvement Project No. 1986 05; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 87- , adopted this date, the City Council has ordered said improvement project completed: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute the option agreement with Normandale Tennis Clubs Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, for the purchase of those portions of Lot 2, Block 1, Dale and Davies 3rd Addition as described in said option agreement for the sum of $47,077.10 and other good and valuable consideration as defined within said option agreement. 2. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute the option agreement with Dale Properties, a general partnership, for the purchase of a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Dale and Davies 3rd Addition, in exchange for a part of Lot 2, Block 2, Dale and Davies 3rd Addition, and other good and valuable consideration as defined within said option agreement. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following g voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. al Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RELATING TO REPLATTING OF LOTS 1 & 2 OF BLOCK 1, DALE AND DAVIES 3RD ADDITION AS RELATED TO IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 1986 -05 WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has obtained two option agreements for the purpose of allowing the purchase of right of way for the future establishment of Grimes Avenue North between Lakebreeze Avenue and the South line of the North one half (Nl /2) of Section 10, T118, R21; and WHEREAS, said option agreements include a provision for the City of Brooklyn Center to replat Lots l and 2 of Block 1 of Dale and Davies 3rd Addition; and WHEREAS, the City Council has proposed to proceed with the acquisition of said property under authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111, under Improvement Project no. 1986 -05, and on this date the City Council has ordered said improvement project complete; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works recommends acceptance of the proposal of Hansen, Thorp, Pellinen, Olson, Inc., Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors, to provide professional services required to replat said property as provided by the option agreements: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center that the proposal submitted by Hansen, Thorp, Pellinen, Olson, Inc., to complete the final plat at a cost of $2,000.00 plus expenses (estimated at $226.00) is hereby accepted and approved. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -05 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed Special Assessment Levy No. 10542 for the following improvement: ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY TO ALLOW FOR FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF A PUBLIC ROADWAY (PROPOSED TO BE GRIMES AVENUE NORTH) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -05 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fifteen (15) years, respectively, as indicated on each assessment roll. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1989, and shall bear interest at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from February 1, 1987. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from February 1, 1987 until December 31, 1988. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. RESOLUTION NO. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT INFORMATION - LEVY INFORMATION {' ---- --- - - - - -- Improvement Project No.: 1986 -05 Levy No.: 10542 { Description: Acquisition of right of way to Fund /Code No.: 59/108• allow for future construction of a public roadway (proposed to be Levy Description: JOSLYN PROPERTY ACQUISITION Grimes Avenue North) Location: Levy runs fifteen (15) years That part of the North one half (N112) with interest at the rate of ten (10) percent. of 10, 118, 21 lying South of the Soo ( Line Railroad right of way between Twin Lake and France Avenue North First payment, with property taxes payable in Improvement Hearing Date: January 12, 1987 - 1988 shall include twenty three (23) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: January 12, 1987 Resolution No. 87- : Assessment District: That part of Government Lot 2 Date of Assessment Hearing: January 12, 1987 lying Southwesterly of Railroad Adopted on: January 12, 1987 right of way except road Method of Apportionment: by Resolution No.: 87- f , Cost Summary from Resolution No.: Total Improvement Cost: Less Direct City Share: (Fund M.S.A.) s, Less Other Payments: C,. Total Assessed to Property: ; Assessed to City Owned Property: Assessed to Other Public Property: Assessed to Private Property: z CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER JOSLYN PROPERTY MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLL ACQUISITION - 15 YEARS PAGE 1 OF 1 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER Additional Notification LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address Mailing Address 10542 86 -05 10- 118 - 21-23-0004 89010 $52,300.00 UNPLATTED 10 118 21 JOSLYN MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY CO THAT PART OF GOVT LOT 2 LYING SWLY 2 NORTH RIVERSIDE PLAZA OF RR RIGHT OF WAY EXCEPT ROAD CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606 J't fi'i MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Patti Page, Administrative Aid DATE: January 9, 1987 SUBJECT: Recommended Conditions Regulating Discharge of Explosives for The Howe Company Section 35 -413.2 of the City Ordinances requires that the utilization of explosives must be licensed by the City Council. The following items are recommended conditions for the utilization and discharge of explosives at The Howe Company facility, 4821 Xerxes Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. 1. The permit is issued to The Howe Company, 4821 Xerxes Avenue North, Brooklyn Center and is nontransferable. 2. The Howe Company shall continue to use a two - component compound, kinestik, or a similar two - component compound. 3. The Howe Company shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local legislation governing the transportation, storage, handling, and detonation of explosives. 4. The Howe Company shall notify the Chief of Police in advance of all blasting operations. 5. City employees shall have the right to inspect upon reasonable notice given to The Howe Company. 6. Authorization to discharge explosives in the City of Brooklyn Center granted under this permit shall expire January 12, 1988. Mal MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Geralyn R. Barone, Personnel Coordinator DATE: January 5, 1987 SUBJECT: Year 2000 Issue #12 - Report and Policy Recommendation from Human Rights Commission Attached is the policy recommendation forwarded from the Brooklyn Center Human Rights Commission to the City Council regarding Year 2000 Issue #12, which states "greater potential for City involvement in social and human resource service delivery" with the implementation suggestion to "direct the Human Rights Commission to study and recommend guidelines for evaluating new social and human resource service needs by January of 1987 ". The policy includes general guidelines to assist the City in dealing with human service contribution requests. In addition, the Human Rights Commission would be responsible for annual needs assessment for the City's human service needs. Action recommended by the Human Rights Commission at its December 10, 1987 meeting (draft of minutes is attached) is to have the City Council approve the policy and its attachments. If you need additional information P lease let me know. enc. DRAFT 12 -31 -86 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER POLICY RELATING TO CITY CONTRIBUTING TO NONPROFIT HUMAN SERVICE PROGRAMS AND /OR AGENCIES General The City of Brooklyn Center is aware that there are many worthwhile nonprofit human service programs and agencies serving metropolitan area residents, and that such organizations are supported primarily through public and private contributions. Contributions to such organizations from the City of Brooklyn Center, when made, will be distributed in accordance with this policy. Purpose To develop an effective method for receiving and considering requests made to the City of Brooklyn Center from nonprofit human service programs and agencies. To maximize the benefits to the citizens of Brooklyn Center from the limited resources available for human services contributions. To maintain objectivity and equity in grantin g contribution requests. To provide a means of monitoring nd responding to g p g community needs and interests that may change from year to year. General Policy Guidelines The Brooklyn Center City Council is responsible for determining whether a financial or in -kind contribution will be made by the City to assist nonprofit human service programs or agencies. The City Council will consider the following guidelines in determining which nonprofit human service program(s) or agency(ies), if any, receive contributions from the City. This policy should not be construed to obligate the City Council to provide financial or in -kind human service contributions. 1. The City Council shall contribute to nonprofit human service programs or agencies for one year, with the option for further contributing after review and approval by the City Council on an annual basis. All requests for contributions must be submitted to the City by May 1 for consideration for the following fiscal year (January 1 to December 31). 2. The City Council shall ive special g p consideration to Community Social Service Act priorities established annually by the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council and to annual needs assessment findings of the Brooklyn Center Human Rights Commission. -1- 3. The City Council will give high priority to contributing to programs or agencies which can demonstrate that the contributions are used to provide services to Brooklyn Center residents. 4. The City Council will give preference to contributing to nonprofit human service delivery programs or agencies that act as an advocate and advisor regarding other available human services for the Brooklyn Center population. 5. Contribution requests will normally be considered in relation to existing City human service commitments and the target populations served. 6. The City Council may request proposals from a variety of alternative sources. 7. Preference will be given to programs or agencies which: A. Have taken affirmative efforts to raise funds to support their efforts. B. Demonstrate in their budgets that there is a continuing concentration on minimization of administrative and overhead costs. C. Cannot be effectively or fully funded through other sources. D. Sponsor programs which have verifiable benefits to the community at large; for example, programs that enhance the effectiveness of City service delivery programs. E. Make effective use of volunteer skills and in -kind contributions to reduce the cost of program /service delivery. 8. Final approval of requests are subject to the City's public hearing and budget approval process. Contribution Request Guidelines The completion of the following procedures is the g p responsibility of the City Council. 1. A letter specifying the required information for consideration for contributions and the deadline for application will be sent to the programs and agencies that have previously requested and received contributions from the City. This information will be available to other interested parties upon request. -2- 2. All written requests for contributions must be Is submitted prior to May 1 for consideration for the following fiscal year (January 1 to December 31). An Application for Contributions form must be filled out completely and submitted as part of the written request. 3. The City Council may request an oral explanation of the written request from each applicant prior to establishing priority rankings. 4. Upon request of the City Council, the Brooklyn Center Human Rights Commission will be available, in an advisory capacity, to research and monitor groups receiving City contributions. 5. City staff may make contribution recommendations to the City Council based upon use of the Evaluation Form for Contributions Requests. Needs Assessment Guidelines On an annual basis, the Human Rights Commission will conduct a needs assessment in the area of human service needs of the community by reviewing the resources listed. A. Community Social Service Act priorities established by the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council B. Priorities established by the United Way C. Local newspaper reports on human service needs or issues D. Community Emergency Assistance Program (CEAP) priorities E. Applications for Contributions, City of Brooklyn Center (for nonprofit human service program /agency) F. Ministerial Association priorities G. Other appropriate sources Additional efforts shall be made to monitor the community by methods available to the Human Rights Commission at the time of assessment. An annual report outlining current human service needs in Brooklyn Center will be prepared by the Human Rights Commission and submitted to the City Council for review. This report may be accompanied by specific recommendations for action by the City to deal with human service needs. -3- DRAFT 12 -31 -86 EVALUATION FORM FOR CONTRIBUTION REQUESTS CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER (OPTIONAL) Applicant Program /Agency Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Contact Person: Phone: Date Application Submitted: Budget Year Requested: Score each statement based on the maximum points listed in parentheses next to each item. The higher the score, the more the actual request is equated to the statement. A total of 100 points is possible. SCORE A. BUDGET (20) (10) 1. The total amount requested is reasonable given the overall program budget. (10) 2. The budget is accurate given the objectives of the proposal during the contribution period. B. COMMUNITY NEED (40) (20) 1. The number of Brooklyn Center residents served is high in relation to the contribution requested. (10) 2. The extent of this service does not overlap with services provided elsewhere in the community. (10) 3. The applicant is meeting an important community need. C. ORGANIZATION NEED (20) (10) 1. The program is not viable without local government contributions. (10) 2. There are few, if any, alternate sources of funding available to the applicant. -1- D. PROGRAM QUALITY (20) (10) 1. The applicant has a realistic view of their resources and the program is limited to their level of competence. The applicant indicates the availability of an effective staff. (10) 2. The administrative and program service costs are in reasonable balance. TOTAL SCORE -2- DRAFT 12 -31 -86 APPLICATION FOR CONTRIBUTIONS CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER (FOR NONPROFIT HUMAN SERVICE PROGRAM /AGENCY) DATE SUBMITTED• (Deadline is May 1 for consideration for the following fiscal year, January 1 to December 31.) APPLICANT PROGRAM /AGENCY NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: PHONE NUMBER: CONTACT PERSON: 1. Generally describe the program /agency, including its mission, date established, services, and g oals. 2. Explain the program /agency's need for City contributions. 3. List specific secured and anticipated sources of contributions available to the applicant. -1- 4. Explain the community need for the proposed service, including a discussion of possible alternative sources for those services available within the community. Describe why those alternative services are not fulfilling the current needs. 5. Describe how Brooklyn Center residents benefit from the services provided. 6. Estimate the total number of eo le expected to a p p p participate or to receive direct benefits, and describe how this number was estimated. 7. Estimate the number of Brooklyn Center residents expected to be served, and describe how this number was estimated. 8. Describe ` the target group for services of the program /agency. 9. Explain the areas of expertise of the program /agency, including a description of the range o P g f staff capability. -2- 10. List percent of budget appropriated for overhead and administration costs. 11. Describe use of volunteers. 12. Describe use of in -kind contributions. 13. Describe how the program is marketed, and to what geographical and demographical areas. 14. Discuss the methodology employed in measuring the effectiveness of the program /agency. 15. List dollar amount of contribution requested from the City. 16. List in -kind contributions requested from the City. -3- Include the following supporting documentation that must accompany this application. If any item is not enclosed, please explain why not. 1. Financial statement for the preceding fiscal year 2. Proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year 3. Data substantiating the need for this service in Brooklyn Center 4. Proof of nonprofit status 5. List of current Board of Directors 6. Job descriptions and resumes of key personnel 7. Statistical or other data measuring effectiveness of the program /agency Signature Date Title -4- MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 10, 1986 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center Human Rights Commission met in regular session and was called to order by Councilmember Lhotka at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL Commissioners Sullivan, Seburg, Eckman, McCumber, Wallerstedt, and Stoderl. Also r s p e ent were Councilmember Lhotka and Recording Secretary Geralyn Barone. Chairperson Kuhar was excused from this evening's meeting, and Commissioner Slupske was absent from the meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 12 1986 Approval of the minutes of the November 12, 1986 meeting was held over to the next regular meeting of the Brooklyn Center Human Rights Commission. INTRODUCTION OF NEW COMMISSIONER The Recording Secretary introduced Ms. Shirley McCumber as the newest member of the Brooklyn Center Human Rights Commission, and the Commissioners introduced themselves to Ms. McCumber. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT - ESTABLISHING GUIDELINES The Commission reviewed the draft policy relating to the City contributing to nonprofit human service programs and /or agencies, section by section, noting changes made to the previous draft. Councilmember ` Lhotka reviewed the role of the Human Rights Commission under the policy, noting that the City Council would probably request some assistance from the Human Rights Commission. Commissioner Wallerstedt noted that the Commission will conduct needs assessment. Councilmember Lhotka added that the City Council would use the Commission in an advisory capacity. The Commission proceeded to review the Evaluation for Contribution Requests form. Commissioner Stoderl asked for clarification on item B -1 on the evaluation form, and the Commission discussed this particular item. Commissioner Sullivan asked what would happen if someone requested contributions after the budget process is completed, and Councilmember Lhotka said most likely the City would not fund that request. The Commission then proceeded to review the Application for Contributions form. Councilmember Lhotka asked how the numbers stated in items 6 and 7 would be estimated, and, after some discussion, it was agreed 12 -10 -86 -1- D D PC E. to add a statement requesting explanation of the estimation of the numbers. Commissioner Stoderl asked for some clarification of item 13, and, after discussion, the statement was deleted and replaced with a new statement on marketing. There was a motion by Commissioner Seburg and seconded by Commissioner Sullivan to recommend to the City Council approval of the policy relating to the City contributing to nonprofit human service programs and /or agencies, including its attached forms, as amended this evening. The motion passed unanimously. The Recording Secretary will notify the Commissioners as to when this i item will be presented to the City Council which most likely will be on January 12, 1987. I SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT SINGLE PARENT FAMILIES Commissioner Stoderl stated that she had no report from this subcommittee. The Commission decided to schedule a meeting of the subcommittee on January 14, 1987 at 7:30 p.m., and the Commission as a whole will not meet until February. Those on the subcommittee on establishing guidelines will attend the City Council meeting in January in lieu of the full Commission meeting. New Commissioner McCumber will serve on the single parent family subcommittee. There was some discussion on teenage pregnancy and problems related to this. OTHER BUSINESS Commissioner Sullivan said he saw former Commissioner Evelyn Misfeldt several weeks ago, and Ms. Misfeldt se nt her greetings I to the Commission. The Recording Secretary stated that if the City Council approves the policy recommendations regarding establishing guidelines, a representative from the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council can be scheduled to assist the Commission in needs assessment at the February or March meeting. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Sullivan and seconded by Commissioner Stoderl to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed. The Brooklyn Center Human Rights Commission adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Chairperson 12 -10 -86 -2- mn D V 0 �-� CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of ,1986 at p.m. at City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment to various license fees. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 561 -5440 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 1, 5, 7, 8, 12, 21, 23 AND 34 REGARDING VARIOUS LICENSE FEES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapters 1, 5, 7, 8, 12, 21, 23 and 34 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn center are hereby amended in the following manner: Section 1 -103. LICENSE FEES. The license fee for each dog license, each commercial kennel license, each private kennel license, each duplicate license, each renewal license, each impounding penalty, and the late penalty described herein shall be as set forth [in Chapter 23 of Brooklyn Center Ordinances] by City Council resolution 1. Late Penalty If any license required hereunder is obtained while the dog is impounded by the City, or after the required licensing period has commenced, there shall be added to the regular license fee, a late license penalty as [provided in Chapter 23 of Brooklyn Center Ordinances] set forth by City ouncil resolution y provided, however, that any n person who acquires yp q adog after the start of a license year, or any person who owns, keeps, harbors, or has custody f a dog at the Y g time of becoming a resident of the City, shall be allowed 30 days to secure a license, without incurring any late license penalty. Section 1 -105. APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND ISSUANCE OF LICENSES. Applications for all licenses required by this ordinance shall be made to the City Clerk. 3. Replacement of Lost Dog License If any dog license tag is lost or stolen, the applicant may obtain a new tag by surrendering the license payment receipt and by paying the charge for a duplicate license as [provided in Chapter 23 of Brooklyn Center Ordinances] set forth by City Council resolution 7. Renewal of License. A copy of the private kennel license or commercial kennel license shall be forwarded to the Director of Planning and Inspection who shall maintain a register of kennel licenses. Subject to any time limitation set by the City Council, the license shall be valid for a period of one year and until October 1 of the then current calendar year, and shall be renewable on October 1 of each year thereafter by the City Clerk upon payment of a renewal license fee set forth [in Chapter 23 of Brooklyn Center Ordinances] by City Council resolution only in the event no complaint regarding the kennel's operation has been received during the license year. In the event that no ORDINANCE N0. revocation of the license is made or contemplated by the City Council, the license shall be renewable as set forth in this subdivision. Section 1 -117. REDEMPTION OF IMPOUNDED ANIMALS. Any animal may be redeemed from the pound by the owner upon payment of the following: 4. An impounding penalty as [provided in Chapter 23 of City Ordinances] set forth by City Council resolution [ Section 5 -501. SCOPE. The provisions of this ordinance contemplates a system of electrical circuits employing a direct circuit communications system (telephone lines) between signaling devices at the protected premises and signal receiving equipment located at the municipal Fire Department remote station. [ Section 5 -502. DEFINITIONS. As used herein, unless otherwise indicated, the following terms are defined as follows: a. Private Fire Alarm System Any fire alarm system owned and installed by an p erson partnership or corporation and P P wholly used in or on the premises of the owner. b. Transmitting Communication System The communications system which transmits a fire alarm signal from the protected premises to the municipal Fire Department. The system shall be leased from the Northwestern Bell Telephone Company at the expense of the protected premises. C. Remote Station The municipal Fire Department station at which signal receiving equipment is located and maintained by the City of Brooklyn Center. d. Person. Any person, partnership, firm or corporation. [ Section 5 -503. ESTABLISHMENT OF REMOTE STATION FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. There is hereby established a remote station fire alarm protective signaling system in the City of Brooklyn Center. The remote station shall be located in City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway. [ Section 5 -504. CONNECTION TO REMOTE STATION FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. Any person desiring to connect a private fire alarm system to the municipal remote station shall: a. Submit for inspection by the City Manager and municipal Fire Chief full and complete plans of the private fire alarm system. b. Obtain from the City Manager a permit, after paying an annual permit fee at the rate of $12 per month for connection to the municipal remote station. [ Section 5 -505. OPERATION OF PRIVATE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. All private fire ORDINANCE N0. alarm systems shall be installed, operated and maintained in full conformance with the current standards set forth by the National Fire Protection Association.] Section 7 -103. REFUSE HAULERS REGULATIONS. B. License Procedure. The provisions of Sections 23 -001 through 23 -013 of the City Ordinances, [including the license fee and penalty provisions thereunder,] shall apply to all licenses required by this ordinance and to the holders of such license. The annual license fee shall be as set forth by City Council resolution The term of each license hereunder shall be from July 1 through June 30. The applications for license or renewal of license shall contain a description of the types and makes of motor vehicles used for collection, a schedule of services to be made to the customers, the frequency of service to be rendered, and full information where and how the material collected will be disposed of, and any other information the Health Authority shall require. Applicants for licenses, after July 1, 1970, to provide routine weekly collection and removal of refuse from residences shall provide as required under this ordinance, complete collection of all refuse which normally results from day -to -day use of this type of property except furnishings, appliances, building or construction wastes and similar bulky wastes for which individuals must make special arrangements. The Health Authority may require vehicle inspection before processing the license application. Applications for license hereunder shall be submitted to the Health Authority for review and recommendation. If the Council is satisfied that the public need, convenience, and good order will be served thereby, it may grant a license to any such applicant meeting the requirements of this ordinance. Section 7 -205. LICENSE FEES. The annual license fee for a public swimming pool shall be as set forth [in Chapter 23 of the City Ordinances] by City Council resolution Section 7 -501. LICENSE REQUIRED. No person, firm or corporation shall hereafter engage in the business of cleaning or pumping cesspools or septic tanks within the City of Brooklyn Center unless they shall be licensed by the City Council which license shall be granted to any applicant therefor on compliance with the following: A. The applicant shall pay a [twenty -five dollar ($25)] license fee, as set forth by City Council resolution and licenses shall run from May 1 to April 30 of the following year. ORDINANCE NO. Section 7 -502 PERMIT REQUIRED. Before commencing Q g cleaning or pumping operations of any cesspool or septic tank within the City of Brooklyn Center, a permit shall first be obtained from the City offices. A permit fee, [of three dollars ($3)] as set forth b City Council resolutio be �_y paid, and the permit shall state ate the remises at which the septic ptic tank or cesspool is located and the estimated gallonage required to be discharged from said cleaning or pumping operations. The permit holder shall thereupon be authorized to discharge the contents from the pumping operations at a designated place lying within the City of Minneapolis. Section 7 -606. LICENSING REGULATIONS AND FEES. License application and possession is subject to provisions of Chapter 23 of the City Ordinances, Sections 23 -001 through Section 23 -013, The annual license fee for a lodging establishing shall be as set forth [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances] by City Council resolution Section 12 -902. LICENSE FEES. [The following]L[1]icense fees, as set forth by City Council resolution shall be due 60 days prior to the license expiration date; in the cases of new unlicensed dwellings, license fees shall be due upon issuance of the certificate of occupancy; in the cases of licensing periods of less than two years, license fees shall be prorated monthly. [1. For each single family dwelling rented, the biennial license fee shall be $12. [2. For the first unit rented within a two - family dwelling, the biennial license fee shall be $12, for the second unit $6. [3. For each multiple family dwelling, the biennial license fee shall be $15 per building, plus $4 per dwelling unit.] Section 21 -104. TAXICAB FEE. The applicant applying for a taxicab license shall pay an annual license fee [of $25] as set forth by City Council resolution for each vehicle to be so licensed. Section 23 -010 LICENSE FEES. The fees for the various licenses shall be as [hereinafter stated, not withstanding other ordinance provisions regarding the specific fee] set forth by City Council resolution Fee, (annual un- less otherwise [ Type of License Required by Section License Expires stated Cesspool Cleaning 7 -501 April 30 $ 25 Mechanical System 23 -1500 April 30 36 Housemoving 23 -1501 April 30 36 ORDINANCE N0. Pool & Billiards 23 -201 Dec. 31 25 /table Nursing Home 23 -1408 Dec. 31 35 /under 50 beds 50/50 or more Service Station 23 -402 Dec. 31 First Pump 40 Each Additional Pump 5 Cigarette 23 -101 Dec. 31 12 Lodging Establishment 7 -602 Dec. 31 33/1 -15 units 41/16 -35 units 106/36 -100 units 138/101 units or more Bakery Food Vehicle 8- 101.01 Feb. 15 25 /vehicle Catering Food Vehicle 8- 101.01 Feb. 15 First Vehicle 100 Each additional vehicle 10 Food Establishment 8- 101.01 March 31 Basic License * *100 ** *200 Each added facility 10 20 Itinerant Food Establishment 8- 101.01 Special First Day 25 Each additional day 10 Readily Perishable Food Vehicle 8- 101.01 Feb. 15 30 Readily Perishable Food Fleet 8- 101.03 Feb. 15 150 Vending Machine - Vendor 8 -Sec. 5 Feb. 15 Bulk Vendor 25 Nonperishable Vendor (excludes bottled & canned soft 8 plus $4 per drink vending machines) machine location Perishable or Readily 20 plus $7 Perishable Vendor per machine location ORDINANCE N0. Combination Perishable- 28 plus appro- nonperishable Vendor priate fee for each machine location Special Food Handling 8- 101.04 Feb. 15 30 Sign Hanger's License 34 -160.2 April 30 40 Motor Vehicle Dealer 23 -1202 April 30 Class A 150 Class B 75 Indoor Swimming Pool (privately owned) 7 -201 April 30 135 Outdoor Swimming Pool (privately owned) 7 -201 April 30 75 Burglar Alarm Permit Resolution 67 -341 May 15 5 /month Firm Alarm Permit 5 -501 May 15 12 /month Amusement Device 23 -2101 June 30 Operator 50 /machine Kiddie Ride 10 /ride Vendor 150 Garbage and /or rubbish Collection 7 -103 June 30 25 /company 15 /vehicle Dog License 1 -102 and License shall be Male or Female 1 -103 valid for the 5 duration of the Neutered Male effective period 3 of the dog's Spayed Female rabies vaccine 3 (upon pre - sentation of proof thereof) Delinquent Dog License 1 -103 N.A. 15 Duplicate Dog License 1 -103 N.A. 2 Commercial Kennel 1 -102 and October 1 (subject 50 together License & Renewal License 1 -103 to any time limita- with reimburse - tion set,by the ment for legal, City Council planning, engineering, and admin- istration costs ORDINANCE N0. Private Kennel 1 -102 and October 1 (subject 30 together License & Renewal License 1 -103 to any time limita- with reim- tion set by the bursement for City Council legal, planning, engineering, and admin- istrative costs Impounding Penalty 1 -103 N.A. 25 Taxi 21 -102 Dec. 31 25 /vehicle Courtesy Bench 23 -901 Dec. 31 12 Bowling Alley 23- 209.01 Dec. 31 10 /alley Bulk Storage 23 -404 Dec. 31 5 Coin Operated Dry Cleaner 23 -1001 Dec. 31 25 Public Dance License 23 -301 Dec. 31 100 Christmas Tree Sales 23 -1301 Special 30 Massage Parlors 23 -1706 Dec. 31 3,000 Masseur or Masseuse 23 -1707 Dec. 31 50 Saunas or Sauna Baths 23 - 1604 Dec. 31 3,000 Rap Parlors, Conversation Parlors, Adult Encounter Groups, Adult Sensitivity Groups, Escort Services, Model Services, Dancing Services, or Hostess Services 23 -1804 Dec. 31 1,500 Gambling Devices 23 -1903 Dec. 31 Class A 5 Class B 25 Bingo 23 -603 Dec. 31 Class A 5 Class B 2 **with an approved and implemented Quality Assurance Plan as defined in Section 8- 100.30 * **without a Quality Assurance Plan] ORDINANCE N0. Section 23 -011. FEES PRORATED. Except for intoxicating liquor t [T]he fee for initial licenses granted after the expiration date, set forth by City Council resolution [in Section 23 -010] shall be prorated on a monthly basis, with the fee required being in the same proportion to the annual fee as the unexpired term of the license stands to the full license period, but in no instance shall the prorated fee be less than $5. Section 23 -012. LATE FEES. 23- 012.01. All licenses shall be renewed annually prior to the expiration date set forth [in Section 23 -010] by City_ Council resolution In the event the applicant fails to renew his license before it expires, a fee of 15 percent of the annual license fee for each week or portion thereof that the renewal is overdue shall be added to the license fee, to a maximum of 45 percent of the annual fee, provided, however, that the penalty clause shall not apply to construction licenses. CIGARETTES Section 23 -103. LICENSE FEE. The fee for every such license shall be [twelve dollars ($12) per year or unexpired portion thereof] as set forth by City Council resolution Every such license shall expire on December 31 next after its issuance. POOL TABLES Section 23- 201.01. LICENSE REQUIRED. No person shall own or keep any pool, billiard or bumper pool table that is used by the public or for which a charge is made for the use thereof within the limits of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, without first obtaining from the City Council of said City a license therefor. The annual license fee for a pool, billiard or bumper pool table shall be as set forth by City Council resolution [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances]. BOWLING ALLEYS Section 23- 209.04 LICENSE FEE. The annual fee for each bowling alley or lane located in the property described in the application shall be as set forth [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances] by City Council resolution PUBLIC DANCING Section 23 -301 LICENSE REQUIRED. No person shall conduct or permit public dancing in any public establishment within which intoxicating liquor or nonintoxicating malt liquor is licensed to be sold or consumed unless a public dance license shall have been issued by the City Council. Licenses shall be issued for one (1) year periods expiring December 31. The annual fee for a public dance license shall be as set forth [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances] by City Council resolution FILLING STATIONS Section 23 -404 LICENSE FEE. The annual fee for each filling station license shall be as set forth [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances] by City ORDINANCE NO. Council resolution and shall be aid to the clerk with the P application for the license. The annual fee for the storage of such liquids as described in Section 23 -401 including the selling and dispensing the same by any other method than by pumps, shall also be as set forth [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances] by City Council resolution BICYCLES [ Section 23 -501. LICENSES REQUIRED. No person shall ride or use a bicycle upon any public street, highway, boulevard or alley in the City of Brooklyn Center unless the bicycle shall be registered and licensed in the name of the actual owner as herein provided. [ Section 23 -502. INFORMATION REQUIRED. Every owner of a bicycle shall register with the City Clerk his name and address, the name of the manufacturer of his bicycle, its number, style and general description. The City Council can deputize other persons to issue licenses in receipt for payment of the license fees on behalf of the clerk. [ Section 23 -503. FORM OF LICENSE. a. The City Clerk shall maintain at the City Hall suitable records of registrations under this is ordinance. On receipt of the license fee herein provided for, he shall provide a suitable identification tag upon which shall be stamped or printed suitable distinguishing letters or numbers. The owner shall affix and keep affixed to the bicycle for which the tag is issued, the original identification tag, and shall keep such tag clean and visible at all times. The City Clerk may, in addition, cause to be imprinted or stamped on the bicycle a suitable registration number, and it shall be unlawful to remove or deface such number. b. No bicycle shall be registered which is in unsafe mechanical condition. The City Clerk shall have authority, upon the recommendation of the Juvenile Court of Hennepin County, to suspend the registration of, and remove the identification tag from, any bicycle operated contrary to any State law or City ordinance or operated while in unsafe mechanical condition, such suspension and removal to continue for a period not to exceed ten (10) days, provided that such registration shall not be reinstated or such identification tag be replaced while such bicycle is in unsafe condition. Such suspension and removal shall be in addition to other penalties provided hereunder. [ Section 23 -504. FEE. The fee for the license required by this ordinance shall be two dollars ($2). Such license shall be valid as long as the bicycle remains the property of the licensee. Whenever ownership is transferred to another resident of the City a new license shall be obtained by the transferee within five (5) days after transfer of ownership. ORDINANCE N0. [ Section 23 -505. LOSS OF LICENSE TAGS. Tags shall not be transferred from one bicycle to another and no person shall attach to any bicycle a tag which was not issued for such bicycle. Upon the loss of a license tag, the City Clerk upon satisfactory evidence of such loss and payment of a fee of seventy -five cents shall issue an appropriate new tag. It shall be unlawful for any unauthorized person to remove or destroy a license tag on a bicycle.] BINGO [ Section 23 -600 ADOPTION BY REFERENCE. The regulatory provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 349.11 to and including Section 349.23 are hereby adopted by reference as a Bingo Ordinance, regulating and strictly licensing the operation of bingo games by certain licensed organizations and are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this ordinance as though fully set forth herein. [ Section 23 -601. LICENSE REQUIRED. No person, except a fraternal, religious, veterans or nonprofit organization governed by Minnesota Statutes Section 290.05, which organization has been in existence for at least three years, has at least 30 present, active members, who have been members for at least six months and whose conditions of membership are duly fulfilled, shall operate, conduct or participate in bingo or bingo occasions nor have any interest in the operation, conduct or participation in bingo or bingo occasions nor possess bingo cards, bingo numbers, bingo accouterments or bingo paraphernalia. No fraternal, religious, veterans or other nonprofit organization as described herein, shall operate, conduct or participate in bingo or bingo occasions or have any interest in the operation, conduct or participation of or in bingo or bingo occasions or possess bingo cards, bingo numbers, bingo accouterments or bingo paraphernalia without first being duly and lawfully licensed as set forth herein. There shall be a class A bingo license and a class B bingo license, eligibility for which shall be determined by the annual gross receipts, actual or projected, of the organization's bingo operation. A class A license must be obtained by organizations whose annual gross receipts, actual or projected, as determined by the City Council are less than $1,500. A class B license must be obtained by organizations whose annual gross receipts, actual or projected, as determined by the Cit y 4 Council are equal to or exceed $1,500. If the annual gross receipts of an organization holding a class A license exceed the maximum permitted under said class A license, that organization must then apply for, pay the fees for and be issued a class B license in the future. [ Section 23 -602. CONTENTS OF AN APPLICATION FOR A LICENSE. Application for a license shall be made only on the forms provided by the City Manager. Four complete copies of the application must be submitted to the City Manager's Office containing the address and legal description of the property to be licensed, the name, address and telephone number of the owner, lessee, if any, and the bingo manager whose name shall be set forth in the application and the name, address, and telephone number of at least two persons of good moral character who shall be residents of Hennepin County, who may be called upon to attest to the applicant's and manager's character. The application must also state whether the applicant and bingo manager have ever been convicted of a crime or offense other than traffic offense and, if so, state complete and ORDINANCE N0. accurate information as to the time, place and nature of such crime or offense including the disposition thereof. The application further must list the names and addresses of all creditors of the applicant, owner, lessee, and bingo manager insofar as and regarding credit which has been extended for the purposes of constructing, equipping, maintaining, operating or furnishing bingo, bingo accouterments, bingo paraphernalia or bingo occasions. If the application is made on behalf of a corporation, joint business venture, partnership or any legally constituted business association, it shall submit along with its application, accurate and complete business records showing the name and addresses of all individuals having an interest in the business, including creditors furnishing credit for the establishment, acquisition, maintenance or furnishing of any bingo games, bingo occasions, bingo paraphernalia or their accouterments and, in the case of a corporation, the names and addresses of all officers, general managers, members of the Board of Directors as well as any creditors who have extended credit for the acquisition, maintenance of furnishing of bingo games, bingo occasions or bingo paraphernalia. [ Section 23 -603. LICENSE FEES, LICENSE INVESTIGATIONS AND LICENSE YEARS. The annual license fee for a class A license is $5 and the fee for investigation for the purposes of issuing this license is $5. The annual license fee for a class B license is $25 and the fee for investigation for the purposes of issuing this license is $50. The license fee and fee for the investigation of issuance of a license shall be paid when the application is filed. In the event that the application is denied or in the event that the license, once issued, is revoked, canceled or surrendered, no part of the annual license fee or fee for the investigation for the issuance of a license shall be returned to the applicant unless by expressed action of the City Council. Only one license shall be granted to each organization for each year. The licensee shall display the license in a prominent place on the licensed premises at all times. Bingo games, bingo occasions, bingo numbers, cards, accouterments and paraphernalia shall be kept, maintained, operated or conducted by licensed organizations only upon the premises which it owns or leases. A license, unless revoked, suspended or canceled, is for the calendar year or part thereof for which it has been issued. The fee for the investigation for issuance of a license must be tendered with each new application for a license and must also be paid at any time when there is a proposed change of ownership, change of bingo manager or reapplication for a license wherein additional or different parties other than the original licensee, parties and bingo manager are proposing to be licensed. All licenses granted herein are nontransferable. The City Council shall act upon a license application within 180 days from the date of application, but shall not issue a license until at least 30 days after the date of application. [ Section 23 -604. GRANTING OR DENIAL OF LICENSES. License application shall be reviewed by the Police Department, Planning and Inspection Department and such other departments as the City Manager shall deem necessary. The review shall include an inspection of the premises covered by the application to determine whether the premises conform to all applicable code requirements. Thereafter, licenses shall be recommended for approval or denial by the City Manager to the City Council subject to the provisions of this ordinance. Any appeal shall be before the City Council Licenses permitting the operation, ORDINANCE N0. conduct or use of bingo games or bingo occasions or the keeping or possession of bingo numbers, cards, devices, accouterments or paraphernalia are nonrenewable and application must be made each year for a license, permitting and allowing the conduct or operation of bingo games and bingo occasions and the possession or use of bingo accouterments, paraphernalia, numbers and the like for the succeeding year. Licenses granted herein are nontransferable. [ Section 23 -605. CONDITIONS GOVERNING ISSUANCE. 1. No license shall be issued if the applicant or any of its owners, managers, employees, agents, or other interested parties are persons of bad repute. 2. Licenses shall be issued only if the applicant and all of its owners, managers, employees, agent or interested parties are free of convictions for offenses which involve moral turpitude or which relate directly to such person's ability, capacity or fitness to perform the duties and discharge the responsibilities of the licensed activity. 3. Licenses shall be issued only o applicants who y pp have not within one year, prior to the date of application, been denied licensure, have had a license revoked, canceled or suspended in or by any community or political subdivision or the State of Minnesota or whose owners, managers or interested parties have not been similarly denied, revoked or suspended. 4. Licenses shall be issued only to applicants who have full and truthfully answered all of the information requested in the application who have paid the license fee fully and the fee for investigation and have cooperated fully and truthfully with the City in the review of the application. 5. Licenses may be granted only in complete conformity with all of the Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center. 6. Licenses shall be issued only to a fraternal, religious, veterans or other nonprofit organization which organization has been in existence for at least three years and has at least 30 present, active members, whose membership dues are fully paid and who have been members for at least six months. 7. Licenses shall be granted only where the licensed premises meet the safety, sanitary and building code requirements of the City. 8. A license shall not be granted where the granting of a license would be inconsistent with the comprehensive development plans with the City or would otherwise have a detrimental effect upon other property or properties in the vicinity. ORDINANCE N0. [ Section 23 -606. RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATIONS. 1. The licensee, the bingo manager and other persons in its employ, agency, or persons with an interest in such business shall comply with all applicable ordinances, regulations and laws of the City of Brooklyn Center, the State of Minnesota and the United States government. 2. The applicant shall designate a person to be bingo manager who shall be responsible for the conduct of the business. Such person shall remain responsible for the conduct of bingo games, bingo occasions, bingo cards, numbers, accouterments and paraphernalia and their operation until another suitable person has been designated in writing as the bingo manager, an investigation fee and application for a change of manager has been filed and the proposed successor to the bingo manager shall have been approved. In all cases, the licensee shall properly notify the Police Department in writing of any such proposed change, indicating the address and name of the new bingo manager and the effective date of such proposed change. 3. The operation or conduct of bingo games or bingo occasions is not permitted between midnight and 8:00 a.m, of the succeeding day. 4. The licensee, bingo manager or their agents, shall permit and allow the inspection of the premises and the operation of the bingo games and bingo occasions by any and all appropriate City officials. 5. Violation of the terms and provisions of this ordinance may be cause for the revocation, suspension, cancellation or nonissuance of other licenses issued by the City to the licensee. 6. Upon demand by any police officer, any person employed in or by any licensed premises shall identify imself b g ivin g y y g g his true legal name, correct address and furnishing suitable identification therefor. 7. No natural person under 18 years of age shall be employed in the operation of the bingo games or bingo occasions. [ Section 23 -607. REVOCATION, CANCELLATION OR SUSPENSION OF LICENSE. The license may be revoked, suspended, canceled or nongranted by the City Council upon recommendation of the City Manager by showing that the licensee, its owners, bingo manager, employees or agents or any of its interested parties have engaged in any of the following conduct: 1. Fraud, deception or misrepresentation in connection with the securing of a license. ORDINANCE NO. 2. Habitual drunkenness or intemperance in the use of drugs, including but not limited to use of prohibited substances defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 152 or Brooklyn klyn Center Ordinances Chapter 19 -1120. 3. Conduct inimical to the interests of the public health, safety, welfare or morals. 4. Engaging in any conduct or being convicted of any crime involving moral turpitude or permitting or allowing others to so engage in said conduct or failing to prevent such conduct. 5. Failure to fully comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance or the failure to comply with any requirements of the laws or ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center, State of Minnesota or United States government. 6. Engaging in any conduct which would constitute grounds for refusal to issue a license under Section 23 -605. The licensee may appeal such suspension, revocation, cancellation or failure to license to the City Council. The City Council shall consider the appeal at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting on or after 10 days from the service of the notice of appeal on the City Manager. At the conclusion of the hearing the Council may order: 1. A revocation, suspension or cancellation of or denial of the license. 2. That the revocation, suspension or cancellation of or failure to grant the license be lifted and that the certificate be returned to the licensee. 3. The City Council may base the revocation, suspension, cancellation or other action with regard to the license upon any additional terms, conditions and stipulations which they may, in its sole discretion, impose. [ Section 23 -608 SEPARABILITY. Every section, provision or part of this ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision or part to the extent that if any section, provision or part of the ordinance shall be held invalid, such holding shall not invalidate any other section, provision or part thereof. [Section 23 -609. PENALTIES. Whoever does any act forbidden by this ordinance or omits or fails to do any act required by this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction therefor, by lawful authority, be punished by a fine not to exceed $700 or imprisonment not to exceed 90 days or both, together with the costs of prosection. Each day that a violation exists constitutes a separate and distinct violation. ORDINANCE N0. [ Section 23 -610. LIABILITY FOR THE CRIMES OF ANOTHER. Every person who commits or attempts to commit, conspires to commit or aids and abets in the commission of any act constituting a violation of this ordinance or any act, which constitutes an omission and, therefore, a violation of this ordinance, whether individually or in connection with one or more persons or as a principal, agent or accessory, shall be guilty of such offense and every person who falsely, fraudulently, forcibly or willfully induces, causes, coerces, requires, permits or directs another to violate any other provisions of this chapter is likewise guilty of such offense.] BENCHES ON PUBLIC WALKS AND WAYS Section 23 -901. LICENSE REQUIREMENTS Any person, firm or corporation desiring to place and maintain one or more courtesy benches for the convenience of persons waiting for street cars and buses at any place in the City of Brooklyn Center, upon the public streets of the City, may be granted a license therefor upon the following conditions: C. Each application shall be accompanied by an inspection fee [of two dollars ($2)] as set forth by City Council resolution, payable to the City of Brooklyn Center for each such bench. d. If the application be granted, an additional license fee as set forth [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances] by City Council resolution, shall be paid to the City of Brooklyn Center for each bench at the time the license is issued. COIN- OPERATED AND SELF - SERVICE DRY CLEANING MACHINES Section 23 -1003. LICENSE FEE. The annual fee for each license shall be [$25 per each calendar year] as set forth by City Council resolution and shall expire on the 31st day of December following date of issue. SALE OF MOTOR VEHICLES Section 23 -1206. LICENSE FEES. The fee for a Class A license shall be [$150 per year for each licensee] as set forth by City Council resolution The fee for a Class B license shall be [$75 per year for each licensee] as set forth by City Council resolution SALE OF CHRISTMAS TREES Section 23 -1302 APPLICATION. The application for license for selling Christmas trees shall be made to the City Clerk and shall be accompanied by a seasonal fee as set forth [in Section 23 -010] by City Council resolution The license will expire on January 5 of the year following its issuance. A separate license shall be required for each place of sale. NURSING HOMES AND BOARDING CARE HOMES ORDINANCE NO. Section 23 -1408 LICENSE FEES. The fee for a nursing home or boarding care home license shall be [$35 per year for those with less than 50 beds and $50 per year for those with 50 or more beds] as set forth by City Council resolution Section 23 -1500 MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS LICENSE REQUIRED. No person shall install, alter, reconstruct, or repair any portion of a building mechanical system consisting of heating, ventilating comfort cooling, or refrigeration equipment, including any `gas piping incidental thereto, without first having procured a license therefor from the City of Brooklyn Center. Licenses shall be issued only to individuals or contractors who demonstrate an understanding of the laws and regulations and techniques relating to the installation and maintenance of building mechanical systems. The annual license fee shall be as set forth [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances] by City Council resolution Licenses shall expire on the last day of April each year. Section 23 -1501 HOUSE MOVING CONTRACTORS LICENSE REQUIRED. No person shall move, remove, or raze any building within Brooklyn Center without first having procured. a license therefor from the [City of Brooklyn Center] State of Minnesota [Licenses shall be issued only to individuals or contractors who demonstrate qualifications and knowledge regarding such work and who can furnish proof of insurance relating to such work. The annual license fee shall be as set forth in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances. Licenses shall expire on the last day of April each year.] a. Permit required. No licensed erson within Brooklyn ookl Center shall move, remove, or raze an building with' y g in Brooklyn Center without first applying for and obtaining a permit from the Building Official. The applicant for a permit shall furnish the Building Official such information as the Building Official deems necessary and shall conform to such reasonable regulations as the Building Official may establish. The application shall be accompanied by a permit fee [in the amount of $25] as set forth by City Council resolution SAUNAS OR SAUNA BATHS Section 23 -1604. LICENSE FEE, LICENSE INVESTIGATION AND LICENSE YEAR. The annual license fee and an investigation fee for the purposes of issuing a license shall be as set forth [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances] by City_ Council resolution [and an investigation fee for the purposes of issuing a license is $1,500]. The license fee and fee for the investigation of the license shall be paid when the application is filed. In the event that the application is denied or in the event that the license once issued, is revoked, canceled or surrendered, no part of the annual license fee or fee for the investigation for the issuance of a license shall be returned to the applicant unless by express action of the City Council. A separate license shall be obtained each year for each place of business. The licensee shall display the license on a prominent place in the licensed premises at all times. A license, unless revoked, is for the calendar year or a part thereof for which it has been issued. The fee for the investigation for issuance of a license must be tendered with each new application for a license and must also be paid at any ORDINANCE N0. time when there is a proposed change of ownership or reapplication for a license wherein additional or different parties other than the original licensee and parties are proposing to be licensed. All licenses granted herein are nontransferable. MASSAGE PARLORS Section 23 -1706. LICENSE FEE, LICENSE INVESTIGATION FEE AND LICENSE YEAR. The annual license fee and an investigation fee for the purposes of issuing_ a license shall be as set forth [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances] by City Council resolution [and an investigation fee for the purposes of issuing a license is $1,500]. The license fee and fee for the investigation of the license shall be paid when the application is filed. In the event that the application is denied or in the event that the license, once issued, is revoked, canceled or surrendered, no part of the annual license fee or fee for investigation for the issuance of a license shall be returned to the applicant unless by express action of the City Council. A separate license shall be obtained each year for each place of business. The licensee shall display the license on a prominent place in the licensed premises at all times. A license unless revoked, is for the calendar year or part thereof for which it has been issued. The fee for the investigation for issuance of a license must be tendered with each new application for a license and must also be paid at any time when there is a proposed change of ownership or reapplication for a license wherein additional or different parties other than the original licensee and interested parties are proposing to be licensed. A license for the operation of a massage parlor is nontransferable. MASSEUR OR MASSEUSE Section 23 -1707. CERTIFICATE FEE, CERTIFICATE INVESTIGATION FEE AND CERTIFICATE YEAR. The annual certificate fee and an investigation fee for the Purposes of issuing a certificate shall be as set forth [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances] by City Council resolution and an investigation fee for the purposes of issuing a certificate is one hundred ($100) dollars] . The certificate fee and fee for the investigation of the certificate shall be paid when the application is filed. In the event that the application is denied or in the event that the certificate, once issued, is revoked, cancelled or surrendered, no part of the annual certificate fee or fee for the investigation for the issuance of a certificate shall be returned to the applicant unless by express action of the City Council. A separate certificate shall be obtained each year. The certificate holder shall display the certificate on a prominent place in the premises of the certificate holder at all times. A certificate, unless revoked, is for the calendar year or part thereof for which it has been issued. The fee for the investigation for issuance of a certificate must be tendered with each new application for a certificate and must also be paid at any time when there is a proposed change of ownership or reapplication for a certificate wherein additional or different parties other than the original certificate holder are proposing certification. A certificate permitting the holder thereof to practice massage is nontransferable. RAP PARLORS, CONVERSATION PARLORS, ADULT ENCOUNTER GROUPS, ORDINANCE N0. ADULT SENSITIVITY GROUPS, ESCORT SERVICES, MODEL SERVICES, DANCING SERVICES, OR HOSTESS SERVICE Section 23 -1804 LICENSE FEE, LICENSE INVESTIGATION AND LICENSE YEAR. The annual license fee and an investigation fee for the purposes of issuing a license [is $1,500] shall be as set forth by City Council resolution [and the annual fee for the investigation for the purposes of issuing a license is $1,5001. The license fee and fee for the investigation of the license shall be paid when the application is filed. In the event that the application is denied or in the event that the license once issued is revoked, canceled or surrendered, no part of the annual license fee or fee for the investigation for the issuance of a license shall be returned to the applicant unless by express action of the City Council. A separate license shall be obtained each year for each place of business. The licensee shall display the license on a prominent place in the licensed premises at all times. A license, unless revoked, is for the calendar year or a part thereof for which it has been issued. The fee for the investigation for issuance of a license must be tendered with each new application for a license and must also be paid at any time when there is a proposed change of ownership or reapplication for a license wherein additional or different parties other than the original licensee and parties are proposing to be licensed. All licenses granted herein are nontransferable. GAMBLING DEVICES [ Section 23 -1900 ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. The regulatory provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 349.26 Minnesota Statutes Section 349.30 through and including Minnesota Statutes Section 349.39, Minnesota Statutes Section 609.75, and Minnesota Statutes Section 609.761, regulating and licensing the operation of certain devices by licensed organizations, are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this ordinance as though fully set forth. [ Section 23 -1901 LICENSE REQUIRED. No person, except a fraternal, religious, veterans or other nonprofit organization covered by Minnesota Statutes Section 349.26, Subd. 9, which organization has been in existence for at least three years and has at least 15 present, active members, all of whose membership dues are fully paid and who have been members for at least six months, shall possess, keep, use, control or operate any gambling device or have any interest in the operation, possession, use or control of gambling devices or conduct or operate a raffle or have any interest in the operation or conduct of a raffle including possession of raffle apparatus or sale of tickets. No fraternal, religious, veterans or other nonprofit organization as described herein, shall possess, keep, use, control or operate any gambling devices or conduct or operate a raffle or have any interest in the operation or conduct of a raffle including possession of raffle apparatus or the sale of tickets without being duly and lawfully licensed as set forth herein. There shall be a class A gambling license and a class B gambling license, eligibility for which shall be determined by the annual gross receipts, actual or projected, of the organization's gambling operation. A class A license must be obtained by organizations whose annual ross receipts, actual or g p projected, as determined by the City Council are less than $3,000. A class B license must be obtained by organizations whose annual gross receipts, actual or projected, as determined by ORDINANCE N0. the City Council are equal to or exceed $3,000. If the annual gross receipts of an organization holding a class A license exceed the maximum permitted under said class A license, that organization must then apply for, pay the fees for, and be issued a class B license in the future. [ Section 23 -1902 CONTENTS OF AN APPLICATION FOR A LICENSE. Application for a license shall be made only on the forms provided by the City Manager. Four complete copies of the application must be submitted to the City Manager's office containing the address and legal description of the property to be licensed, the name, address and telephone number of the owner, lessee, if any, and the gambling manager whose name shall be set forth in the application and the name, address and telephone number of at least two persons of good moral character who shall be residents of Hennepin County, who may be called upon to attest to the applicant's or manager's character. The application must also state whether the applicant and gambling manager has ever been convicted of a crime or offense other than a traffic offense and, if so, state complete and accurate information as to the time, place and nature of such crime or offense including the disposition thereof. The application further must list the names and addresses of all creditors of the applicant, owner, lessee, gambling manager insofar as and regarding credit which has been extended for the purposes of constructing, equipping, maintaining, operating or furnishing gambling devices or their accouterments. If the application is made on behalf of a corporation, joint business venture, partnership or any legally constituted business association, it shall submit along with its application accurate and complete business records showing the names and addresses of all individuals having an interest in the business, including creditors furnishing credit for the establishment, acquisition, maintenance or furnishing of any gambling devices, gambling paraphernalia or their accouterments and, in the case of a corporation, the names and addresses of all officers, general managers, members of the Board of Directors, as well as any creditors who have extended credit for the acquisition, maintenance or furnishing of gambling devices. All applicants shall furnish to the City, along with their application, complete and accurate documentation establishing the interest of the applicant and any other person having an interest in the operation, keeping, possession, use or control of gambling devices, raffle apparatus or raffle tickets. [ Section 23 -1903. LICENSE FEES, LICENSE INVESTIGATIONS & LICENSE YEARS. The annual license fee for a class A license is $5 and the fee for investigation for the purposes of issuing this license is $5. The annual license fee for a class B license is $25 and the fee for investigation for the purposes of issuing this license is $50. The license fee and fee for the investigation for issuance of a license shall be paid when the application is filed. In the event that the application is denied or in the event that the license once issued is revoked, canceled or surrendered, no part of the annual license fee or fee for the investigation for the issuance of a license shall be returned to the applicant unless by express action of the City Council. Only one license shall be granted to each organization for each year. The licensee shall display the license in a prominent place on the licensed premises at all times. Gambling devices, raffles and all apparatus related to either shall be kept, maintained, operated or conducted by licensed organizations only upon the premises which it owns or leases except that tickets for raffles may be sold off the premises. A license, ORDINANCE N0. unless revoked, suspended or canceled is for the calendar year or part thereof for which it has been issued. The fee for the investigation for issuance of a license must be tendered with each new application for a license and must also be paid at any time when there is a proposed change of ownership, change of gambling manager or reapplication for a license wherein additional or different parties other than the original licensee, parties and gambling manager are proposing to be licensed. All licenses granted herein are nontransferable. The City Council shall act upon a license application within 180 days from the date of application, but shall not issue a license until at least 30 days after the date of application. [ Section 23 -1904. GRANTING OR DENIAL OF LICENSES. License application shall be reviewed by the police department, planning and inspection department and such other departments as the City Manager shall deem necessary. The review shall include an inspection of the premises covered by the application to determine whether the premises conform to all applicable code requirements. Thereafter, licenses shall be recommended for approval or denial by the City Manager to the City Council subject to the provisions of this ordinance. Any appeal shall be before the City Council. Licenses permitting the operation, use, keeping or possession of gambling devices or operation or conduct of raffles or the possession or keeping of gambling device paraphernalia or raffle apparatus are nonrenewable and application must be made each year for a license, permitting and allowing the operation, keeping, use or possession of gambling devices or raffles or raffle apparatus or any interest therein for the succeeding year. Licenses granted herein are nontransferable. [ Section 23 -1905 CONDITIONS GOVERNING ISSUANCE. 1. No license shall be issued if the applicant or any of its owners, managers, employees, agents or other interested parties are persons of bad repute. 2. Licenses shall be issued only if the applicant and all of its owners, managers, employees, agents or interested parties are free of convictions for offenses which involve moral turpitude or which relate directly to such persons's ability, capacity or fitness to perform the duties and discharge the responsibilities of the licensed activity. 3. Licenses shall be issued only to applicants who have not, within one year, prior to the day of application, been denied licensure, have had a license revoked, canceled or suspended in or by any community or political subdivision or the State of Minnesota or whose owners, managers, or interested parties have not been similarly denied, revoked or suspended. 4. Licenses shall be issued only to applicants who have fully and truthfully answered all of the information requested in the application, who have paid the license fee fully and the fee for investigation and have cooperated fully and truthfully with the city in the review of the application. ORDINANCE N0, 5. Licenses may be granted only in complete conformity with all of the ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center. 6. Licenses shall be issued only to a fraternal, religious, veterans or other nonprofit organization covered by the Minnesota Statutes Section 349.25, Sub. 9, which organization has been in existence for at least three years and has at least 15 present, active members whose membership dues are fully paid and who have been members for at least six months. 7. Licenses shall be granted only where the licensed premises meet the safety, sanitary and building code requirements of the City. 8. A license shall not be granted where the granting of a license would be inconsistent with the comprehensive development plans of the City, or would otherwise have a detrimental effect upon other property or properties in the vicinity. [ Section 23 -1906. RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATIONS. 1. The licensee, the gambling manager and other persons in its employ, agency, or persons with an interest in such business shall comply with all applicable ordinances, regulations and laws of the City of Brooklyn Center, the State of Minnesota and the United States government. 2, The applicant shall designate one person to be gambling manager who shall be responsible for the conduct of the business. Such person shall be an active member of the licensee organization, or its auxiliary, or the spouse or surviving spouse of an active member. Such person shall remain responsible for the conduct of the gambling devices, raffles, and their operation until any other suitable person has been designated in writing as the gambling manager, an investigation fee and application for a change of manager has been filed and the proposed successor to the gambling manager shall have been approved. The licensee shall promptly notify the police department in writing of any such change indicating the address and name of the new gambling manager and the effective date of such change. 3, The operation or conduct of gambling devices, raffles or the sale of raffle tickets is not permitted between midnight and 8:00 a.m. of the succeeding day. 4. The licensee, gambling manager or their agents, shall permit and allow inspection of the premises and the operation of the gambling devices and raffles by any and all appropriate city officials. ORDINANCE NO. 5. All licenses under which any licensed business is P ermitted to be carried on upon the licensed premises shall be revoked if the intentional possession or willful keeping of any such gambling devices upon the licensed premises is established, notwithstanding that it may not be made to appear that such devices have actually been used or operated for the purpose of gambling. 6. Upon demand by any police officer, any person employed in or by any licensed premises shall identify himself by giving his true legal name, correct address and furnishing suitable identification therefor. 7. No natural person under 18 years of age shall be employed in the operation of gambling devices or raffles except that persons under 18 years of age may sell raffle tickets or chances. 8. The gambling manager shall give a fidelity bond in the sum of $10,000 in favor of the licensee conditioned upon faithful performance of his duties. Terms of the bond shall provide that notice shall be given in writing to the licensing authority not less than 30 days prior to its cancellation. The City Council may waive the bond requirement by including a wavier provision in the license but such action may be taken only by a unanimous vote. 9. Total prizes from the operation of paddlewheels, tipboards and pull -tabs (or ticket jars) awarded in any single day in which they are operated shall not exceed $1,000. Total prizes resulting from any single spin of a paddlewheel, or from any single seal of a tipboard, each tipboard limited to a single seal, or from a single pull -tab (or ticket jar), shall not exceed $150. Total prizes awarded in any calendar year by any organization from the operation of paddlewheels, tipboards and pull -tabs (or ticket jars) and the conduct of raffles, except as provided in Minnesota Statutes Section 349.26, Subdivision 15a, shall not exceed $35,000. Merchandise prizes shall be valued at fair market value. [ Section 23 -1907. REVOCATION, CANCELLATION OR SUSPENSION OF LICENSE. The license may be revoked, suspended, canceled or not granted by the City Council upon recommendation of the City Manager by showing that the licensee, its owners, gambling manager, employees, agents or any of its interested parties have engaged in any of the following conduct: 1. Fraud, deception or misrepresentation in connection with the securing of a license. 2. Habitual drunkenness or the use of illegal drugs, including but not limited to the use of prohibited substances as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 152 or Brooklyn Center ORDINANCE N0, Ordinances 19 -1120. 3. Conduct inimical to the interest of the public health, safety, welfare or morals. 4. Engaging in any conduct or being convicted of any crime involving moral turpitude or permitting or allowing others to so engage in said conduct or failing to prevent such conduct. 5. Failure to fully comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance or the failure to comply with any requirements of the laws or ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center, State of Minnesota or the United States government. 6. Engaging in any conduct which would constitute grounds for refusal to issue a license under Section 23 -1905. The licensee may appeal such suspension, revocation, cancellation or failure to license to the City Council. The Council shall consider the appeal at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting on or after 10 days from the service of the notice of appeal to the City Manager. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Council may order: 1. A revocation, suspension or cancellation of the license or that the license not be granted. 2. That the revocation, suspension or cancellation be lifted and that the certificate be returned to the licensee. 3. The City Council may base the revocation, suspension, cancellation or other action with regard to the license upon any additional terms, conditions and stipulations which they may, in their sole discretion, impose. [ Section 23 -1908. SEPARABILITY. Every section, provision or part of this ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision or part to the extent that if any section, provision or part of the ordinance shall be held invalid, such holdings shall not invalidate any other section, provision or part thereof. [ Section 23 -1909 PENALTIES. Whoever does any act forbidden by this ordinance or omits or fails to do any act required by this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof by lawful authority, be punished by a fine not to exceed $700 or imprisonment not to exceed 90 days or both, together with the costs of prosecution. Each day that a violation exists constitutes a separate and distinct violation. _(Section 23 -1910 LIABILITY FOR THE CRIMES OF ANOTHER. Every person who commits or attempts to commit, conspires to commit or aids and abets in the commission of any act constituting a violation of this ordinance or any act, which constitutes an omission and, therefore, a violation of this ordinance, ORDINANCE N0. whether individually or in connection with one or more persons or as a principal, agent or accessory, shall be guilty of such offense and every person who falsely, fraudulently, forcibly or willfully induces, causes coerces, requires, permits or directs another to violate any of the provisions of this Chapter is likewise guilty of such offense.] ALARM SYSTEMS Section 23 -2003. PERMITS AND EXEMPTIONS. 3. Process for Issuance of Permit. Upon receipt and determination of the fifth false police alarm report or the second false fire alarm report at an address, the Chief of Police, after review, may notify the City Clerk, who shall then assess the alarm user for an alarm user's permit. The assessment invoice shall be sent by certified mail. The alarm user must submit the required permit fee to the City Clerk within [ten (10)] thirty (30) working days after receipt of the assessment invoice, in order to continue to use his alarm system. Any subsequent false police or fire alarm at that address shall automatically revoke that permit and the process must then be repeated. This process shall be repeated for each and every false alarm in excess of four (4) false police alarms and in excess of one (1) false fire alarm during each calendar year. Section 23 -2006. PERMIT FEES. 1. The fees for alarm user's permits shall be [fifty dollars ($50)] as set forth by City Council resolution for police alarm systems and [one hundred fifty dollars ($150)] for fire alarm systems. AMUSEMENT DEVICES Section 23 -2104. LICENSE FEE. A. The annual license fee for required licenses shall be as set forth [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances] by City Council resolution Licenses shall be issued for an annual period from July 1 through June 30 for each year hereafter, provided, however, that the initial license fee for each applicant shall be prorated as of the date of the application therefor. Said application for license shall then be presented to the City Council for consideration, and if approved, the City Clerk shall issue the license to the applicant. B. At the time of application for an operator's license or vendor's license the applicant shall pay in full an investigation fee [in the amount of $100] as set forth by ORDINANCE NO. City C resolution If at any time an additional investigation is required because of a change of ownership or control of a corporation or partnership previously licensed, the licensee shall pay in full an additional investigation fee as set forth by City Council resolution [in the amount of $50]. Investigation fees shall not be refunded. Section 34 -160 SIGN HANGER'S LICENSE 2. The fee for a sign hanger's license shall be as set forth [in Section 23 -010 of the City Ordinances] by City Council resolution and the license shall run from May 1 to April 30 of the following year. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of , 19 Mayor ATTEST: Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.) MEMO TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager er g FROM: Darlene Weeks, City Clerk SUBJECT: License Fee Increases DATE: January 6, 1986 The following license fees listed on the attached resolution are recommended for increase. Lodging establishment fees have remained the same since set in 1976 and rental license fees have remained the same since established in 1975. The last time licenses marked by an asterisk were raised was 1978. The Quality Assurance Plan setting food establishment fees was implemented in 1983 and have remained the same since then. The inspection fee for courtesy benches has been $2 for more than 10 years. License Present Fee Recommended Increase Cesspool Cleaning $20 $ 25 *Mechanical System 36 45 Cigarette 12 15 Lodging Establishment 33/1 -15 units 70 41/16 -35 units 95 106/36 -100 units 170 138/101 units or more 200 *Bakery Food Vehicle 25 /vehicle 30 Food Establishment without a Quality Assurance Plan 200 250 each added facility with Quality Assurance Plan 10 20 without Quality Assurance Plan 20 40 *Itinerant Food Establishment lst day 25 30 Each additional day 10 15 *Vending Machine - Vendor Nonperishable Vendor 8 plus $4 /machine 10 plus $5/ machine location location Gerald G. Splinter -2- January 6, 1986 *Perishable or Readily 20 plus $7 /machine 22 plus $8 /machine Perishable Vendor location location *Sign Hanger's License 40 50 *Garbage and /or Rubbish Collection 25 /company 35 15 /vehicle 20 Courtesy Bench Inspection Fee 2 5 Rental License Fees Single Family Dwelling 12 25 Two - Family Dwelling first unit 12 25 second unit 6 10 Multiple Family Dwelling per building 15 20 per dwelling unit 4 5 The Police Department requests an additional change in Section 23 -2003 relating to alarm system permits and exemptions. The change is that the alarm user must submit the required permit fee to the City Clerk within thirty - -not ten -- working days after receipt of the assessment invoice in order to continue to use the alarm system. Ud Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE FOR VARIOUS LICENSE FEES WHEREAS, Chapter 23 of the City Ordinances establishes fees to be charged for various licenses; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be less cumbersome and a better method of ensuring a uniform fee structure to set forth these fees in a fee schedule; and WHEREAS, Chapter 23 of the City Ordinances has been amended to authorize the setting of various fees by City Council resolution rather than by ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to adopt the following fee schedule: LICENSE FEE Cesspool Cleaning $ 25 Mechanical System 45 Pool & Billiards 25 /table Nursing Home 35 /under 50 beds 50/50 or more Service Station First Pump 40 Each Additional Pump 5 Cigarette 15 Lodging Establishment 70/1 -15 units 95/16 -35 units 170/36 -100 units 200/101 units or more Bakery Food Vehicle 30 /vehicle Catering Food Vehicle First Vehicle 100 Each additional vehicle 10 o RESOLUTION NO. Food Establishment Basic License with approved & implemented Quality Assurance Plan as defined in Section 8- 100.30 $100 without a Quality Assurance Plan 250 Each Added Facility with Quality Assurance Plan 20 without Quality Assurance Plan 40 Itinerant Food Establishment First Day 30 Each Additional Day 15 Readily Perishable Food Vehicle 30 Readily Perishable Food Fleet 150 Vending Machine - Vendor Bulk Vendor 25 Nonperishable Vendor (excludes bottled and canned soft drink vending machines) 10 plus $5 per machine location. Perishable or Readily 22 plus $8 Perishable Vendor per machine location Combination Perishable- 28 plus appropriate nonperishable Vendor fee for each machine location. Special Food Handling 30 Sign Hanger's License 50 Motor Vehicle Dealer Class A 150 Class B 75 Indoor Swimming Pool (privately owned) 135 Outdoor Swimming Pool (privately owned) 75 Police Alarm Permit 50 Fire Alarm Permit 150 RESOLUTION No. Amusement Device Operator $ 50 /machine Kiddie Ride 10 /ride Vendor 150 Investigation Fee 100 Garbage and /or Rubbish Collection 35 /company 20 /vehicle Dog License Male or Female 5 Neutered Male (upon presentation of proof thereof) 3 Spayed Female (upon presentation of proof thereof) 3 Delinquent Dog License 15 Duplicate Dog License 2 Commercial Kennel 50 together with License and Renewal License reimbursement for legal, planning, engineering, & administration costs Private Kennel License and 30 together with Renewal License reimbursement for legal, planning, engineering, & administration costs Impounding Penalty 25 Taxi 25 /vehicle Courtesy Bench 12 Inspection Fee 5 Bowling Alley 10 /alley Bulk Storage 5 Coin Operated Dry Cleaner 25 Public Dance License 100 Christmas Tree Sales 30 • r i RESOLUTION No. Massage Parlors 3,000 Investigation Fee 1,500 Masseur or Masseuse 50 Investigation Fee 100 Saunas or Sauna Baths $ 3 Investigation Fee 1,500 Rap Parlors, Conversation Parlors, Adult Encounter Groups, Adult Sensitivity Groups, Escort Services, Model Services, Dancing Services, or Hostess Services 1,500 Investigation Fee 1,500 Rental License Fees Single Family Dwelling 25 Two - Family Dwelling first unit 25 second unit 10 Multiple Family Dwelling per building 20 per dwelling unit 5 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above schedule of fees shall become effective on lgg Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. MEMORANDUM TO: Darlene Weeks, City Clerk FROM: Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection C? u--) SUBJECT: License and Permit Increases DATE: January 6, 1987 I recommend the following annual license fees be increased: Cesspool Cleaning - from $20.00 to $25.00 Mechanical Systems - from $36.00 to $45.00 Signhangers - from $40.00 to $50.00 Please be advised that the State of Minnesota now licenses Housemovers exclusively. The Housemoving License should, therefore, be deleted from the City's license schedule, however, the City still requires housemoving permits. Attached is a draft resolution amending City Council Resolution No. 86 -123 which, effective September 29, 1986, established new permit fees to be collected by the Planning and Inspection Department. The purpose of this draft resolution is to include cesspool cleaning and housemoving permits in the Planning and Inspection Department Fee Schedule. These fee amounts will no longer be contained in City Ordinances. It is also recommended that these permit fees be increased as follows: Cesspool Cleaning Permit - from $3.00 to $18.75 Housemoving Permit - from $25.00 to $31.25 If you have any questions or comments or care to discuss this recommendation further, please contact me. ml n y Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 86 -123 REGARDING THE SCHEDULE FOR PLANNING AND INSPECTION DEPARTMENT FEES Whereas, .the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center adopted Resolution No. 86 -123 on August 11, 1986 which established new fees collected by the Planning and Inspection Department; and Whereas, the City Council has determined that it would be less cumbersome and a better method of ensuring a uniform fee structure to set forth these fees in a fee schedule; and Whereas, City Ordinances have been amended to authorize the setting of various fees by City Council resolution rather than by ordinance; and Whereas e a se in are permit fees for Cesspool Cleaning and Hou mov g currently collected by the Planning and Inspection Department, but are not included in the Planning and Inspection Department Fee Schedule. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to amend the Planning and Inspection Department Fee Schedule by the addition of the following: 9. Miscellaneous Permit Fees Miscellaneous permit fees shall be collected at the time applications are executed according to the following: Fee (a) Cesspool Cleaning $18.75 (b) Housemoving Or Demolition $31.25 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above fees shall become effective on , 198 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i M & C NO. 87 -1 January 9, 1987 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Charitable Gambling at Liquor License Locations To the Mayor and City Council: Attached please find copy of a memorandum written by Chief Lindsay discussing and reviewing the Brooklyn Center Lions Club gambling license. Jim discusses the initial problems the Lions Club had in managing their operations at Earle Brown Bowl and Lynbrook Bowl, and also recounts their successes after an initial, difficult start. I concur ' recommendation for continuing the Brooklyn 1 Center 1e Lions 1n Club's gambling license at these two locations. As for an overall policy in this matter, I believe the following items should be considered carefully before issuing any further licenses. First, the Council should understand that with each license issued there will be increased police time spent on activity related to these licenses. This will be especially true if the licenses are given to organizations who have not had experience at running these operations and do not have a longstanding track record of running their own club businesses well. We believe the Lions Club because of its past experience and reputation was a good "test case" and even as capable as the Lions Club was, they had problems operating a cash business of this volume. We estimate that for each license issued the police department staff would have to expend somewhere between one quarter and one half of a full -time position handling the paperwork and activity of these licenses. If we have numerous sites, it could have a considerable impact on the staffing requirements for the police department. Some of this time is police officer time; some of it is police administrative and clerical time. Secondly, I believe that before additional licenses, if any, are issued, the Council should establish some criteria as to the type of charitable organizations that will be considered for licensing, the home or location of those organizations, and you should consider carefully where the donations from the profits of these operations are channeled. We recommend that if additional licenses are going to be considered by the City Council, that these licenses be issued only to longer standing, capable local charitable organizations and that a considerable percentage of the charitable donations from the proceeds of these operations be required to be channeled within the local community, not outside the community. M & C NO. 87 -01 -2- January 9, 1987 If the Council decides that there is sufficient benefit to the community in giving charitable gambling licenses, it should also understand there are a not insignificant amount of police related activity generated by these type of operations. If you were to eliminate all of this type of gambling, it would eliminate police activity generated by these type of operations. However, there are certain community benefits to these charitable gambling operations, and those benefits must be balanced against the disadvantages or disincentives. It would be my recommendation if the City Council wishes to consider issuing further licenses, that you refrain from issuing any further licenses and instruct the City Manager to prepare a draft policy which will limit and regulate in some fashion the types of charitable organizations the Council will consider, and regulate the flow of proceeds so that the majority of the proceeds flow back into Brooklyn Center. If Brooklyn Center taxpayers are going to be paying for the police and other administrative activity generated by charitable gambling, then it is my recommendation that the community of Brooklyn Center be the primary benefactor of the proceeds. I believe such a policy could be worked out in cooperation with the Lions Club now that both City staff and the Lions Club have had experience in this area. Respectfully submitted, Gerald G. Sp inter City Manager � Licenses to be approved by the City Council on January 12, 1987: AMUSEMENT DEVICE OPERATOR Ground Round, Inc. 2545 County Road 10 Chief of Police g1C BOWLING ALLEY LICENSE Beacon Bowl 6525 Lyndale Avenue N. Lynbrook Bowl, Inc. 6357 North Lilac Drive City Clerk CIGARETTE LICENSE Beacon Bowl 6525 Lyndale Avenue N. Brooklyn Center Service, Inc. 6849 Brooklyn Boulevard Consumer Vending Service 2828 Lyndale Avenue S. Bridgeman's 6201 Brooklyn Boulevard Gift Shop Too 1501 Freeway Boulevard K -Mart 5930 Earle Brown Drive Lynbrook Bowl, Inc. 6357 North Lilac Drive The Pipeseller Shop 1301 Brookdale Center Super America Station #4058 1901 57th Avenue North Super America Station #4160 6545 West River Road Target 6100 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Theisen Vending Company 3804 Nicollet Avenue S. Ground Round, Inc. 2545 County Road 10 Twin City Novelty Company 9549 Penn Avenue South Chuck Wagon Inn 5720 Morgan Avenue North Yen Ching Restaurant 5900 Shingle Creek Pkwy. ICJ (l City Clerk FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE – r J . ]V Nature Food Center 6068 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Sanitarian GASOLINE SERVICE STATION LICENSE Brookdale Mobil 5710 Xerxes Avenue N. Brooklyn Center Municipal Garage 6844 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Brooklyn Center Service, Inc. 6849 Brooklyn Boulevard Green Meadows 3319 49th Avenue North The Howe Company 4821 Xerxes Avenue North j� I /,OJ610— Super America Station #4160 6545 West River Road o V W City Clerk v LODGING ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE Brookdale Motel 6500 West River Road Northwest Residence 4408 69th Avenue North Ramada Hotel 2200 Freeway Boulevard Sanitarian POOL AND BILLIARD TABLE LICENSE Lynbrook Bowl, Inc. 6357 North Lilac Drive City Clerk PUBLIC DANCE LICENSE Ramada Hotel 2200 Freeway Boulevard City lerk y � READILY PERISHABLE FOOD VEHICLE LICENSE O q , -4 Leeann Chin's, Inc. 6050 Shingle Creek Pkwy. TT``// Sanitarian GENERAL APPROVAL: r � d 4 D. K. Weeks, City Clerk S