Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987 12-14 CCP Regular Session CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DECEMBER 14, 1987 1. Call to Order 7 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Open Forum 5. Recess to EDA 6. Approval of Consent Agenda - All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. *7. Approval of Minutes - November 23, 1987 - Regular Session 8. Mayoral Appointments: a. Human Rights and Resources Commission b. Park and Recreation Commission C. Planning Commission d. Housing Commission e. Northwest Hennepin Human Services Advisory Commission *f. Weed Inspector - Brad Hoffman 9. Performance Bond Releases: *a. Brookdale Corporate Center II, 6200 Shingle Creek Parkway *b. Madsen Floral Townhouses, 55th Avenue North and Aldrich Drive *c. Highway 100 Tennis Club Parking Lot, 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North *d. LaCasita Restaurant, 2101 Freeway Boulevard 10. Resolutions: a. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation for the Dedicated Public Service of Mary Jo Copeland *b. Accepting Work Performed under Contract 1986 -R (Earle Brown Farm Streetscape, Improvement Project No. 1986- 21, Phase III, Streetscape Lighting) *c. Accepting Work Performed under Contract 1987 -B (Water Tower No. 1, Reconditioning Project No. 1987 -02) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- December 14, 1987 *d. Amending Resolution No. 87 -210 Accepting Work Performed under Contract 1987 -E (Brookdale 16 Inch Water Main, Improvement Project No. 1987 -03) *e. Accepting Work Performed under Improvement Project No. 1987 -18 (Painting of the East and West Fire Stations and at Liquor Store No. 2) *f. Accepting Quotation and Authorizing the Purchase of a New Liner for the Filter Tank for the Community Center Swimming Pool - Appropriation within the 1988 Budget g. Establishing the Following Projects and Accepting Proposal for Architectural Services Relating to the Preparation of Construction Plans and Specifications and Construction Services Therefor (Improvement Project No. 1988 -01, Police Department Remodeling, Phase III; Improvement Project 1988 -02, Community Center Improvements, Phase II; Improvement Project 1988 -03, Reroof /Insulate City Garage) *h. Authorizing the City Manager to Sign a Renewal Contract with Goodwill Industries, Inc. to Operate a Recycling Center *i. Accepting Bids and Authorizing Purchase of One 28,000 GVW Cab - Chassis Truck - Appropriation within the 1988 Budget *j. Accepting Bids and Authorizing Purchase of Four Police Patrol Sedans - Appropriation within the 1988 Budget *k. Authorizing the City Manager to Write Off Uncollectible Accounts Receivables *1. To Transfer Surplus Funds from Various Special Assessment Funds to the Capital Projects Fund *m. To Transfer Surplus Funds from Various Debt Service Funds to the Capital Projects Fund *n. To Transfer Surplus Funds from Open Space Land Acquisition Fund to the Capital Projects Fund *o. Accepting the Quotation and Authorizing the Purchase of One Copier - Appropriation within the 1988 Budget p. Recognizing the Achievement of Wayne Smith -Mr. Smith has swam 500 miles at the community center, and has accomplished this in a three year period. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- December 14, 1987 q. Awarding Insurance Contracts -This includes boiler and machinery coverage, as well as liquor 11. Planning Commission Items: 7:30 p.m. Consideration of Items Relating to Lots 46 and 47, Block 6, Pearson's Northport Third Addition -These items relate to the resolution of conflicts resulting from the intrusion of the houses located at 5806 and 5812 Halifax Avenue North into the existing public utility easements. a. Planning Commission Application No. 87023 submitted by James Andrescik requesting a variance from Section 34- 400 of the zoning ordinance to allow a zero setback for an attached garage presently built over the side property line and a storm sewer easement. -This item was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its October 15, 1987, meeting. The City Council opened the public hearing on this application at its November 9, 1987, meeting, continued the hearing to the November 23, 1987, meeting, and further continued it to this evening's meeting. b. Planning Commission Application No. 87024 submitted by James Andrescik requesting a variance from the subdivision ordinance to allow a land. transfer by metes and bounds division rather than by formal platting. -This item was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its October 15, 1987, meeting. The City Council opened the public hearing on this application at its November 9, 1987, meeting, continued the hearing to the November 23, 1987, meeting, and further continued it to this evening's meeting. 1. Resolution Approving Agreement for the Relocation of a Storm Sewer within the Public Utility Easements between Lots 46 and 47, Block 6, Pearson's Northport Third Addition 2. An Ordinance Vacating Portions of the Public Utility Easements Located on Lots 46 and 47, Block 6, Pearson's Northport Third Addition -This ordinance was first read on October 5, 1987, and published in the City's official newspaper on October 15, 1987. A second reading was held on November 9, 1987, the public hearing was continued to the November 23, 1987, meeting, and further continued to this evening's meeting. 12. Discussion Items: a. City Charter Commission Resolution Directing the Brooklyn Center City Council to Consider an Ordinance Amending the City Charter CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -4- December 14, 1987 1. An Ordinance Amending he Brooklyn g y Center City Charter -This ordinance is offered this evening for a first reading. b. Fire Department Relief Association Bylaws Regarding Trustees C. Designation of Mississippi River as National Scenic River d. Northern Mayor's Association Steering Committee Report e. Light Rail Transit Report f. Approval of Local Addendum to the Master Labor Agreement between Metropolitan Area Management Association (representing the City of Brooklyn Center and 22 other metropolitan cities) and the International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local No. 49, AFL- CIO 13. Consideration of Specified Licenses: a. On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses Class A ($8,000 per year) -Red Lobster -Yen Ching b. On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses Class B ($11,000 per year) - Applebees -Earle Brown Bowl -Green Mill Inn - Ground Round Restaurant -Days Inn - Holiday Inn -T. Wright's C. On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Class C ($14,000 per year) - Lynbrook Bowl d. On -Sale Sunday Intoxicating Liquor License ($200 per year) -Red Lobster, Yen Ching, Applebees, Earle Brown Bowl, Green Mill Inn, Ground Round Restaurant, Days Inn, Holiday Inn, T. Wright's, and Lynbrook Bowl e. On -Sale Club License - Brooklyn Center American Legion No. 630 f. On -Sale Wine License - Denny's Restaurant CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -5- December 14, 1987 g. On -Sale Nonintoxicating Malt Liquor License - Beacon Bowl -Chuck Wagon Inn Davanni's Pizza - Denny's Restaurant -The 50's Grill - Little Brooklyn -Pizza Hut -Rocky Rococo -Score Board Pizza *14. Licenses 15. Adjournment Note: An Executive Session Regarding Labor Negotiations and the Community Action /Kelly House lawsuit will Follow the City Council and Economic Development Authority Meetings. MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION NOVEMBER 23, 1987 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Works Sy Knapp, Finance Director Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning and Inspection Ron Warren, City Sanitarian Tom Heenan, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, HRA Coordinator Brad Hoffman, and Personnel Coordinator Geralyn Barone. INVOCATION The invocation was offered by Councilmember Lhotka. OPEN FORUM Mayor Nyquist recognized Arnold Land, 6845 York Place North, Brooklyn Center, who said he is representing six homeowners in the Earle Brown Farm Town Houses near 69th Avenue North and Shingle Creek Parkway. He referenced two newspaper articles from the Brooklyn Center Post from 1972 and 1973 which note part of the conditions for approval of the town homes was installation of a 6 foot fence and planting of trees. Mr. Land proceeded to describe fraudulent claims made by the contractor, including the erection of a fence that never has been installed and planting of trees that never were planted. He said at the rear portion of the town house complex, dirt, concrete, and old curbing has been dumped onto the property, making the area look like a dumping ground. Mr. Land said the town home association does not have enough reserves to maintain the back property and thought perhaps the City Council could foreclose on the bond issued to the contractor. The City Manager said he will investigate this complaint and report back to Mr. Land and the City Council. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Nyquist inquired if any Councilmembers requested any items removed from the consent agenda. Councilmember Theis requested item 7b be removed from the consent agenda, and Mayor Nyquist removed item 7k from the consent agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - NOVEMBER 9 1987 - REGULAR SESSTON There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to approve the minutes of the November 9, 1987, City Council meeting. The motion passed unanimously. 11 -23 -87 _1_ r `t RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION 87 -212 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1987 -D (1987 DISEASED SHADE TREE REMOVAL PROGRAM, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -06) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -213 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR DELIVERY OF ONE (1) FRONT END LOADER WITH ACCESSORY EQUIPMENT (APPROPRIATION WITHIN THE 1988 BUDGET) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -214 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A REPLACEMENT SQUAD CAR The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -215 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTATION AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A MID SIZE EXTENDED CAB The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -216 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING GIFT FROM THE BROOKLYN CENTER LIONS CLUB The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -217 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING ADJUSTMENTS TO THE 1987 BUDGET OF THE NORTH METRO CONVENTION AND TOURISM BUREAU 11 -23 -87 -2- The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -218 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES FOR JAMES MOFFET REPRESENTING THE ALL - AMERICA CITY COMMITTEE The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously. LICENSES There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to approve the following list of licenses: COMMERCIAL KENNEL Snyder Brothers Drug Store 1296 Brookdale Center ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Brooklyn Center Lions 6500 Humboldt Ave. N. RENTAL DWELLING Initial: Henry W. Norton 5240 Drew Ave. N. Arnold Borsch 5341 Penn Ave. N. Renewal: Leonard H. Schollen 5305 4th St. N. Karl I. Stendal 5456 Emerson Ave. N. Darlene Dimitroff 6442 Indiana Ave. N. Clifford Lane & Dorothy Ernst 6927 June Ave. N. Hallard N. Corey 4201 Lakeside Ave. N., #118 Michael E. Schultz 4207 Lakeside Ave. N., #127 Jonathan Cain 4207 Lakeside Ave. N., #135 Ernest W. Gertzen 5347, 49 Penn Ave. N. Carin Lee Rudolph 5318, 20 Queen Ave. N. Gene & Anna Gullord 5337, 39 Queen Ave. N. Robert Messersmith 5338 Queen Ave. N. Robert & Arlene Johnson 7218, 24 West River Road Harold & Howard Swanson 7240 West River Road SERVICE STATION Brookdale Mobil 5710 Xerxes Ave. N. Brooklyn Center Municipal Garage 6844 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Brooklyn Service Center 6901 Brooklyn Boulevard Christy's Auto Service 5300 Dupont Ave. N. Humboldt Avenue Service 6840 Humboldt Ave. N. Northern States Power 4501 68th Ave. N. Total Petroleum, Inc. 6830 Brooklyn Blvd. Wes' Amoco 6044 Brooklyn Blvd. 11 -23 -87 -3- The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED) The City Manager presented a Resolution Accepting Work Performed under Contract 1987 -H (Sate Ili te /Dumpster Enclosures, Park Improvement Project No. 1987 -13). Councilmember Theis pointed out the resolution is in error as written, and he specified item 2 in the resolution should include "the value of the work performed is less than the original contract amount plus change order No. 1 and supplemental agreement No, l." RESOLUTION NO. 87 -219 Member Rich Theis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption as amended in item 2: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1987 -H (SATELLITE /DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES PARK IMPROVEMENT PRO - PROJECT N0. 1987 13 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Gene Lhotka, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Accepting Engineer's Report Regarding Rehabilitation of Well House No. 5 and 6 (Improvement Project No. 1987 -20) and Accepting Proposal for Architectural Services Relating to the Preparation of Construction Plans and Specifications and Construction Supervision of Project. The City Manager noted the question raised by Councilmember Lhotka at the last Council meeting regarding terracing of the roof has been responded to in a memorandum from the Director of Public Works. The Director of Public Works proceeded to review an example of what terracing is. Councilmember Lhotka asked what the planned taper for the City's buildings will be, and the Director of Public Works said this has not yet been designed; his best estimate is that it will be similar to or a little less than the examples shown. Councilmember Lhotka asked what will go over the installation, and the Director of Public Works proceeded to review the options for roofing materials. He noted generally the City will lean to a modified or built -up roof. Councilmember Lhotka asked if the City will really be helping the situation much, especially with regard to snow. The Director of Public Works said there will be a tapered roof at the community center, and the City's architect felt this is sufficient to prevent deterioration caused by water build up. Councilmember Lhotka said he has a difficult time realizing the recommendation will be effective on the smaller buildings. There was further discussion between Councilmember Lhotka and the Director of Public Works on how the tapering works. Councilmember Lhotka inquired about the costs of the project, and the Director of Public Works said the terracing is somewhat cheaper than an alternate suggested by Councilmember Lhotka. Councilmember Lhotka said he still has real doubts on the comparison of cost, but because the Director of Public Works seems sure the cost will be the same, he will go along with it. The Director of Public Works said after discussions with the architects, he is confident the City will have good results. 11 -23 -87 -4- Councilmember Hawes expressed concern about the insulation, and the Director of Public Works said it would not be a problem. He stated further the architects have a good deal of experience with these structures and he is going on the recommendation of the architects. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -220 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT REGARDING REHABILITATION OF WELL HOUSE NO. 5 AND 6 (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -20) AND ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES RELATING TO THE PREPARATION OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION OF PROJECT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of a 3/4 Ton Cab - Chassis for the Public Utilities Department. He said this is a replacement vehicle and the memorandum in the agenda packet describes the equipment. Councilmember Lhotka asked why this is not considered during the normal budget process, and the City Manager noted the Public Utilities Department is not part of the City's budget. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -221 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A 3/4 TON CAB - CHASSIS FOR THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Accepting Quotation and Authorizing the Purchase of a Mid Size Pickup for the Public Utilities Department. He noted this request is similar to the previous one. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -222 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTATION AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A MID SIZE PICKUP FOR THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Amending Article VII of the Advisory Commission Bylaws. Mayor Nyquist said he requested removal of this from the consent agenda because the more he read the amendment, the more he had problems with it. He feels it is dangerous as proposed, and the previous language is reasonable. 11 -23 -87 -5- There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to table the Resolution Amending Article VII of the Advisory Commission Bylaws and to send it back to the Park and Recreation Commission requesting more appropriate language. The City Manager said this will also be reviewed with the City Attorney. Upon vote being taken on the foregoing motion, the motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS The City Manager said a hearing on a Resolution of Intent to Organize Collection of Refuse within the City of Brooklyn Center is scheduled for this evening. He pointed out that a number of communities are passing resolutions similar to this. He said the resolution would require the City to look at recycling goals during the next 90 days, and it may require changes in the way refuse is handled in the City at this time. The City Manager said there are three alternatives: have the existing haulers organize their collection process; bid out the collection to one contractor; or hire our own personnel. He said the latter option is the least attractive, and the bidding process has some disadvantages, especially because it limits competition; the preferred choice is to negotiate with the existing haulers. He said the best of all worlds would be to keep costs close to what they are now. The City Manager said the cities of Brooklyn Park, Crystal, and New Hope are interested in participating in a joint powers agreement with Brooklyn Center and the existing haulers. Staff recommends this alternative. Mayor Nyquist asked if the City Manager thinks municipalities could achieve their goals at the estimated cost. The City Manager said this is an estimate and pointed out the City of Champlin is providing service for less than proposed. He proceeded to review the costs involved. Councilmember Theis asked if under any of the proposals the residents would have a choice of haulers. The City Manager said they would not. He added a large percentage of waste is from yards and recyclables, and it would take separate vehicles to collect the various types of waste. He said it would not be a good idea to have three different haulers a week coming to a residence in addition to having a variety of vehicles coming up and down the streets all week servicing other residences. Councilmember Theis expressed concern over the costs and said he would like to see them regulated if possible. The City Manager said some cities are using one contractor and said this is fine if you do get a good contractor; however, there can be problems associated with this also. He pointed out because a contract would be negotiated with the haulers and a contractual relationship is established between the City and the consortium of haulers, the quality of service can be controlled through the contract. Councilmember Theis asked about the billing process for refuse service, and the City Manager said some cities do the billing and others have the contractors do it. He noted there is better control over the service if the City bills the users, but then the City receives all the complaints. Councilmember Theis pointed out if the City does not get involved in service, the homeowner would have no one to go to if there is a problem with the contractor. The City Manager said ultimately a resident would complain to the City because of the contract with the haulers. His point was if your name is on the bill, you would 11 -23 -87 -6- receive the first complaint. He added the City does license haulers and inspect their vehicles; the City could revoke licenses if standards are not met. Mayor Nyquist asked if apartments would be covered by this process, and the City Sanitarian said only single family homes and duplexes would be included. The City Manager noted the landfills are being filled at an alarming rate and there are things being put in that could be recycled. He said the first step of the process is to remove the items that do not need to g o to the landfill. He added there is no question that costs will increase in the long erm. The City y Manager said he believes the City should seriously consider joining with other cities and feels there are enough haulers to get a good balance for good service. Councilmember Hawes cited a company in Hopkins that provides garbage containers to its customers, and he wondered if the City would require each hauler to provide such containers. The City Sanitarian said it would probably be up to the individual hauler. The City Manager said this would not be included in the contract. Councilmember Hawes asked if the City of Hopkins still allows residents to push leaves into the street for a sweeper to collect, and the City Manager said he was not sure, but this is not a very efficient way to collect leaves. Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on a Resolution of Intent to Organize Collection of Refuse within the City of Brooklyn Center. He recognized Tom Hagel who said he supports the resolution and asked the City of Brooklyn Center to look at supporting the container deposit bill in the legislature. He proceeded to review the benefits of doing so and said he feels that such a bill would reduce litter and encourage recycling. He said a container deposit bill is not the total answer, but it is a good start. Mr. Hagel encouraged the City Council to support this bill. Mayor Nyquist inquired if there was anyone else present who wished to speak at the public hearing. No one requested to speak and he entertained a motion to close the public hearing. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to close the public hearing on a Resolution of Intent to Organize Collection of Refuse within the City of Brooklyn Center. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -223 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO IMPLEMENT A COOPERATIVE REFUSE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION SYSTEM IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes. Councilmember Theis asked what the next step would be if the resolution passes. The City Manager said, with approval of the City Council, staff will convene a meeting with the haulers serving Brooklyn Center and explore a Joint Powers Agreement with Brooklyn Park, Crystal, and New Hope. Then staff will return to 11 -23 -87 -7- the City Council with a joint powers agreement outlining the specifics of the program at that time. If the City is unable to prepare such an agreement, other alternatives will be explored. It was the consensus of the Council that staff be directed to pursue a joint powers agreement with other interested cities and try to negotiate a contract with the haulers organized as a consortium. Upon vote being taken on the foregoing motion, the motion passed unanimously. HEARING ON REVENUE SHARING FUNDS The City Manager said a public hearing is scheduled regarding revenue sharing funds. He said there is a residue of money from revenue sharin g and staff is requesting his money be appropriated g riated to the proper Y rr r r rer zccounts. Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on revenue sharing funds and inquired if there was anyone present who wished to speak at the public hearing. No one requested to speak and he entertained a motion to close the public hearing. There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Scott to close the public hearing on revenue sharing funds. The motion passed unanimously. Y Councilmember Theis asked if there will be an increase in the appropriation to the general fund as a result of this. The Director of Finance said the money will be transferred to the contingency fund in the unallocated unit, but it will be appropriated for specific items. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -224 Member Rich Theis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1988 GENERAL FUND BUDGET FOR THE TRANSFER OF REVENUE SHARING FUNDS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Gene Lhotka, and the motion passed unanimously. ORDINANCES The City Manager presented An Ordinance Amending Chapter 25 Changing the Name of 57th Avenue North between Lyndale Avenue North and T.H. No. 100 and County State Aid Highway No. 10 between T.H. No. 100 and the West Corporate Limit to Bass Lake Road. He said this ordinance was first read on October 26, 1987, published in the City's official newspaper on November 5, 1987, and is offered this evening for a second reading. He said notices of this hearing have been sent to property owners and residents of property abutting this route. The Director of Public Works presented an overview of the request initiated by two property owners on the central portion of the route who requested changing the name of the roadway to Bass Lake Road. He said the first reading approved the renaming of the entire roadway starting at 57th and Lyndale Avenues North and proceeding to the western corporate limits, renaming all of this as Bass Lake Road. He said following the first reading, the engineering department sent notices to the property owners of record, and in the case of absentee owners, to 11 -23 -87 -8- I the residents at the addresses along this route. A return card was enclosed for the residents inquiring as to their preference on this issue. The Director of Public Works proceeded to review a summary of the responses received. Councilmember Theis asked if this proposal were approved, how the changeover would take place. The Director of Public Works said the process, as discussed with the postmaster, would be to have the City notify the post office of any changes made. Then the property owners would receive notices from the post office requesting the residents to make the change in their address during the next six months. All business accounts, personal correspondence, and so on, would have to be changed. After the initial six month period, for one additional year, anyone who submits a change of address notice that says they are in the process of changing their address could have service continued at the old address for that additional year. Following this entire 18 month period, all property owners would be expected to change their addresses to the new ones. The Director of Public Works pointed out all mail carriers have been instructed that if they are familiar with an address and the intent is obvious, they are required to deliver the mail. The City Manager said he received tw Y g o phone calls regarding this. A concern is that it would be a burden to change all addresses, especially if someone is on a number of mailing lists. Councilmember Scott said she received four phone calls from people living west of Brooklyn Boulevard and four calls from people living east of T.H. 100. She said all were strongly opposed to any change, especially if only two businesses are the ones who want the change made. Included in the problems associated with the name change would be having to change all mailing address information. An additional problem is associated with service people trying to find the location of a property. Councilmember Scott said she objects to asking residents to change their addresses to oblige two businesses. Mayor Nyquist pointed out the two businesses are only asking for addresses. Councilmember Lhotka asked what the official names of the sections of this roadway are. The Director of Public Works proceeded to review the variety of names used along this roadway, particularly between T.H. 100 and Brooklyn Boulevard. The Director of Planning and Inspection said the property addresses used by the City for issuing permits include the following: east of T.H. 100 to Lyndale Avenue North is known as 57th Avenue North; between T.H. 100 and Brooklyn Boulevard is known as County Road 10; and west of Brooklyn Boulevard to the City's corporate limits is known as 58th Avenue North. Councilmember Scott asked how many businesses are located between T.H. 100 and Brooklyn Boulevard, and the Director of Public Works said approximately seven. The Director of Public Works said in the short term there would be a good deal of confusion over the name change if approved, but the City should make a decision based on the long -term affect. Councilmember Scott said the whole problem is the area contingent to Brookdale and perhaps the City needs to have one address for this area. The City Manager asked the Director of Public Works if the post office would certify both the existing addresses plus the addition of Bass Lake Road. The Director of Public Works said once the City Council takes action, the post office would go along with only one official name. 11 -23 -87 -9- Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on An Ordinance Amending Chapter 25 Changing the Name of 57th Avenue North between Lyndale Avenue North and T.H. No. 100 and County State Aid Highway No. 10 between T.H. No. 100 and the West Corporate Limit to Bass Lake Road. He recognized Ms. Barbara Sexton, 3824 58th Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, who said she is very opposed to changing her address. She pointed out that the Brooklyn Historical Society would also have a change of address and it would take a long time to get all addresses changed. Mayor Nyquist recognized Ms. Sharon Baker, 806 57th Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, who said she lives on the easterly portion of this roadway and strongly opposes any change. She said she has lived here for 18 years and there has never been a problem receiving mail or having problems with service people finding her home. She said changing addresses would be an expense and it is not fair for the residents to make a change to please a few businesses. Ms. Baker asked the Council to leave the rest of the residents alone and take care of the businesses separately. Mayor Nyquist recognized Ms. Bernice Vaillancourt, 1000 57th Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, who said she wants to keep her address. She pointed out there are already streets in Brooklyn Center with two different addresses, including 69/70th Avenue North and 65/66th Avenue North. She asked the Council to please leave the road as it is. Mayor Nyquist inquired if there was anyone else present who wished to speak at the public hearing. No one requested to speak and he entertained a motion to close the public hearing. There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to close the public hearing on An Ordinance Amending Chapter 25 Changing the Name of 57th Avenue North between Lyndale Avenue North and T.H. No. 100 and County State Aid Highway No. 10 between T.H. No. 100 and the West Corporate Limit to Bass Lake Road. The motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Scott said she would like to deny the ordinance change. She recommends the City Council get together with the businesses to determine what they would like to name the section between T.H. No. 100 and Brooklyn Boulevard. She feels Bass Lake Road is not the proper designation. The City Manager said the Council may wish to table the ordinance if another change is going to be considered; this would cut down on the cost of publishing notices of an ordinance change in the newspaper. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to deny the ordinance and leave the roadway as it is. Councilmember Theis said he feels there is some confusion in the center section and also agrees with the residents' concerns. He said there is some merit in changing the name of the center section. There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to table An Ordinance Amending Chapter 25 Changing the Name of 57th Avenue North between Lyndale Avenue North and T.H. No. 100 and County State Aid Highway No. 11 -23 -87 -10- i 4 10 between T.H. No. 100 and the West Corporate Limit to Bass Lake Road. Upon vote being taken on the foregoing motion, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and the following voted against the same: Gene Lhotka and Celia Scott, whereupon said motion passed. The City Manager said he will check with businesses between T.H. 100 and Brooklyn Boulevard on their preferences for a name for this roadway. He added this item will be back on the agenda in about one month. RECESS The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 8:49 p.m. and reconvened at 9:07 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 87026 SUBMITTED BY THOMPSON LUMBER REQUESTING A SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL TO RELOCATE A METAL BUTLER BUILDING FROM ITS MINNEAPOLIS LOCATION TO THE LUMBER YARD AT 4810 NORTH LILAC DRIVE (OLD FEDERAL LUMBER SITE) The City Manager presented Planning Commission Application No. 87026 submitted by Thompson Lumber. The Director of Planning and Inspection referred the City Council to pages one and two of the November 12, 1987, Planning Commission minutes and the information sheet attached with the minutes regarding Planning Commission Application No. 87026. He proceeded to review the application and said the Planning Commission recommended approval of the application subject to seven conditions. The Director of Planning and Inspection said the seventh condition can be deleted because the City received the topographical survey today. Councilmember Lhotka and the Director of Planning and Inspection proceeded to discuss the type of siding on the structure. Councilmember Hawes inquired about the material used for the roof and was responded to by the Director of Planning and Inspection. Councilmember Hawes said he thought the ordinance did not allow for outside storage, and the Director of Planning and Inspection said an I -2 zone allows for this except if it abuts residential property. Councilmember Lhotka asked why the applicants are moving the building, and the Director of Planning and Inspection said they feel the building is salvageable from their other lumber yard, and there is space available here. Councilmember Lhotka asked if the applicants are going to continue using the entire area, and the Director of Planning and Inspection said they intend to use the entire old Federal Lumber site for lumber storage. The Council proceeded to review and discuss the elevations and drawings of the buildings. Councilmember Lhotka and the Director of Planning and Inspection proceeded to discuss further the materials used for the siding of the building. Councilmember Lhotka said he would like the sight lines to be where the product cannot be seen from public view. The Director of Planning and Inspection suggested adding this as a condition of the application. Mayor Nyquist noted there is no hearing required for this application. There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve Planning Commission Application No. 87026 submitted by Thompson 11 -23 -87 -11- i 1 � Lumber requesting a site and building plan approval to relocate a metal, Butler building from its Minneapolis location to the lumber yard at 4810 North Lilac Drive (Old Federal Lumber site), subject to the following conditions: 1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits, 2. Utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits. 4. The storage building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 5. The applicant shall enter into a restrictive covenant agreement to provide up to 86 additional parking stalls on the site upon a determination by the City that the stalls are needed for the proper functioning of the site. Said agreement to be executed and filed with the title to the property prior to the issuance of permits. 6. The property owner shall enter into an Easement and Agreement for Maintenance and Inspection of Utility and Storm Drainage Systems prior to the issuance of permits. 7. Plan approval authorizes the use of a rough cedar siding exterior treatment on the east and west walls of the relocated building. If the metal siding on the north and south walls of the building proves to be visible to the public, the applicant then shall be required to provide a rough cedar siding exterior treatment on the north and south walls of the building. The motion passed unanimously, PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 87023 SUBMITTED BY JAMES ANDRESCIK REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 35 -400 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW A ZERO SETBACK FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE PRESENTLY BUILT OVER THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE AND STORM SEWER EASEMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 87024 SUBMITTED BY JAMES ANDRESCIK REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO ALLOW A LAND TRANSFER BY METES AND BOUNDS DIVISION RATHER THAN BY FORMAL PLATTING The City Manager said these items were recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its October 15, 1987, meeting. The City Council opened the public hearings on these applications at its November 9, 1987, meeting and continued 11 -23 -87 -12- J w the hearings to this evening's meeting. The Director of Planning and Inspection said the applicant had been requested to present a signed copy of an agreement and a copy of a proposed temporary easement, as well as a letter of credit naming the City in the letter. The applicant had presented a personal letter of credit which did not name the City. After reviewing this with the City Attorney, the Director of Public Works said he recommends tabling these applications for two weeks so the letter of credit can be put in proper form. He said he feels this is necessary since there are numerous actions being looked at by the City and feels it would not have been proper to ask the City Council to take action this evening. He further requested all items related to these applications be tabled to the next meeting. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to table to the next City Council meeting Planning Commission Application Nos. 87023 and 87024; a Resolution Approving Agreement for the Relocation of a Storm Sewer within the Public Utility Easements between Lots 46 and 47, Block 6, Pearson's Northport Third Addition; and An Ordinance Vacating Portions of the Public Utility Easements Located on Lots 46 and 47, Block 6, Pearson's Northport Third Addition. The motion passed unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEMS IMPROVEMENTS OF FRANCE AVENUE NORTH FROM SOUTH CITY LIMITS TO 50TH AVENUE NORTH' LAKEBREEZE AVENUE NORTH FROM T.H. 100 TO AZELIA AVENUE NORTH: 50TH AVENUE NORTH FROM T.H. 100 TO FRANCE AVENUE NORTH: AND LOGAN AVENUE NORTH FROM 57TH AVENUE NORTH TO 59TH AVENUE NORTH The City Manager requested the City Council to review these improvement projects as potential projects for 1988. Once reviewed and preliminarily approved, staff will bring back formal requests to the City Council. The Director of Public Works said these are preliminary proposals, and staff feels there is a need for improvements which could be constructed in 1988. He noted all projects except for the Lakebreeze Avenue North one are designated as state aid streets. He said he will review the projects and obtain City Council input on whether or not to proceed with these further. If the Council agrees to do so, proposals would be presented to the Council in late December or early January. At that point, if the City Council approves the proposals, the next step would be to plan public hearings. The City would be in a position to take bids in late April and begin the projects by May 1988. The Director of Public Works said the encumbered balance of the City's municipal state aid funds is $1,643,000, and the City is at a point that if the funds are not used future year allocations y 1 cations may be reduced. He pointed out that the Minnesota Department of Transportation does have an aggressive policy of doing this. He added if the City does not do any of these projects in 1988, it would start to realize the penalty of a reduced appropriation in 1989. The Director of Public Works proceeded to review the proposals, noting all streets are designated as municipal state aid streets except Lakebreeze Avenue North which is included because there are problems with the geometric design of the roadway and there is no curb, gutter, and sidewalks. He said in discussions with the health club and other property owners in the area, he found support for installing concrete curb and gutter. He added residents in the area have requested installation of a sidewalk on Lakebreeze Avenue North from Azelia to 11 -23 -87 -13- France Avenues North. He proceeded to review the proposal for Logan Avenue North, noting one reason why the street is in such bad condition is because there is very poor drainage. Councilmember Scott asked if there is any way to fix the lake that always forms at 57th and Humboldt Avenues North. The Director of Public Works reviewed the location of the storm sewers in the area. He said he had not been aware of the problem at 57th and Humboldt Avenues North, but would investigate it; he added the solution to this problem is probably independent of the Logan Avenue North improvements. Councilmember Lhotka asked if the area indicated on the map that shows Logan Avenue North narrowing down actually does so on the roadway. The Director of Public Works said the width of the road is the same and the map shows the existing right of way, which may be deceiving. Mayor Nyquist asked if the highway department has plans for adding an interchange at T.H. 100 and France Avenue North. The Director of Public Works said there is nothing in the plans now for this. Fifteen years ago there was, but in the last six years, nothing has been programmed (programs go beyond the Year 2000). The Director of Public Works proceeded to show a slide presentation of the areas in question. Councilmember Theis asked if there is sufficient funding available for these projects, and the Director of Public Works responded affirmatively. He said although Lakebreeze Avenue North is not a municipal state aid road, the majority of the property is assessable and levying special assessments would be considered. Councilmember Theis asked about the funding of the storm sewer projects, and the Director of Public Works said most of the work is eligible for funding from the state's fund. In areas where there are drainage problems, the intention is to recommend levying special assessments. Councilmember Theis wondered if money is used in these projects, whether or not there would be money available for improvements of 69th Avenue North around Palmer Lake. The Director of Public Works said probably not; however, staff hopes when more detailed estimates are available they may be lower than expected. He said the City does not have to use the entire state aid funds that it is eligible for on a project and could reserve some money in a special account which could be used for the project on 69th Avenue North. Councilmember Lhotka asked if these four projects are high priorities, and the Director of Public Works responded affirmatively. He said they represent streets in the worst condition in the City. After this, 69th Avenue North is the next priority. He noted the City has hired an engineer to do a traffic and environmental study on 69th Avenue North and does not think this project could be started until 1989. However, the City should begin acquisition of right of way on 69th Avenue North in 1988. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -225 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECTS AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORTS ON LOGAN AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1988 -04, FRANCE AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1988 -05, LAKEBREEZE AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1988 -06, AND 50TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1988 -07 11 -23 -87 -14- The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Hawes, and the motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Theis said he would like to see a report with the costs for improvement of the area between T.H. 100 and the Soo Line Railroad on France Avenue North listed separately. Councilmember Hawes asked if the curb and gutter improvements include driveway aprons, and the Director of Public Works responded affirmatively. Upon vote being taken on the foregoing resolution, the motion passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF 1988 CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE The City Manager presented the 1988 City Council meeting schedule and pointed out the adjustments made for the September meetings because of the budget review process. There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to approve the 1988 City Council meeting schedule as presented. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Nyquist referred to a letter he received from the City of Crystal regarding organized collection and asked if the City wants to respond to this. No action was taken by the City Council regarding this. The City Manager presented a Resolution Authorizing Participation in the Logis Group Health Plans. He said everyone of the instrumentalities previously with Hennepin County joined the group, and the City's costs will not change. Councilmember Theis asked how much the employees have been involved in this process, and the City Manager said the employees and union representatives have been kept informed during the process. RESOLUTION N0. 87 -226 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE LOGIS GROUP HEALTH PLANS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Appropriating Funds for Items Relating to the Redesignation of the Social Hall as Constitution Hall. The Director of Public Works said he met with Bill Lakotas, chairman of the Brooklyn Center Constitution Committee, and agreement has been reached on a proposal for an emblem for Constitution Hall. The emblem will be smaller than originally proposed because of cost considerations. The Director of Public Works said the preliminary budget for this was $8,915 and bids exceeded $14,000. There were efforts to reach a solution to this, and a different supplier and emblem have been obtained for a total cost $7,570. The Director of Public Works said the Constitution Committee has agreed to reimbursing the City for this cost. It will be established as a City expenditure to be reimbursed by the Constitution Committee. Councilmember Theis said he cannot relate to the cost for the emblem 11 -23 -87 -15- and also asked for a further description of the signs over the entry way doors to the hall. The Director of Public Works proceeded to describe them. RESOLUTION NO. 87 -227 Member Rich Theis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR ITEMS RELATING TO THE REDESIGNATION OF THE SOCIAL HALL AS CONSTITUTION HALL The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Gene Lhotka, and the motion passed unanimously. Mayor Nyquist said a few years ago the police department did a good job of solving the Peterson murder. He said he was incensed when the City was sued, and really incensed when he found out the City had to pay $25,000. He asked what control the City has over these types of incidents, what effect there is on insurance premiums, and he asked if the City should get out of the liquor business. The City Manager proceeded to review the insurance situation. The Director of Finance said he did not think the insurance premiums will be affected. The City Manager pointed out this is becoming a litigious society and the liquor store is one minor aspect of the City's endeavors. Mayor Nyquist asked if an executive session will be needed to discuss the law suit filed by residents who live in the area of the Bill Kelly House and the City Manager said this may be necessary at some point. The City Attorney will review the suit and make a recommendation on whether an executive session is necessary. Mayor Nyquist said he hopes the City does not spend a lot of time and money defending this. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 10:46 p.m. City Clerk Mayor 11 -23 -87 -16- MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Geralyn R. Barone, Personnel Coordinator i DATE: December 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Mayoral Appointments Several terms of appointment for advisory commissioners are due for consideration of reappointment by the mayor and city council. Each of the commissioners has been notified, and they have expressed their intentions on whether or not they wish to be reappointed. Below is a summary of these positions. HOUSING O C MMISSION Ken Felger wants to be reappointed to serve through 12- 31 -90; current chairman Philip Cohen wants to be reappointed to serve through 12 -31 -90 Clifford Williams, Sr. did not respond to notification HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESOURCES COMMISSION Barry Wallerstedt does not want to be reappointed Louis Sullivan wants to be reappointed to serve through 12 -31 -90 PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION Arvid (Bud) Sorenson wants to be reappointed to serve through 12- 31 -90; current chairman Larry Propst wants to be reappointed to serve through 12 -31 -90 PLANNING COMMISSION Carl Sandstrom does not want to be reappointed Michael V. Nelson all want to be reappointed to serve Molly Malecki through 12 -31 -89 Ann Wallerstedt _.NORTHWEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY COMMISSION Frances Gunberg does not want to be reappointed Also, attached are appointment applications from Myrtle Hall for either the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Advisory Commission or the Brooklyn Center Human Rights and Resources Commission. As Brooklyn Center has only two members on the NWHHSAC, I would strongly recommend she be appointed to serve on this commission for a term expiring 12- 31 -89. APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE BROOKLYN CENTER HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESOURCES COt*TISSTON Name Address Street Zip Code Telephone Home Wo rk Occupation--; 'e. L L -e Years lived in Brooklyn Center I have read the Human Rights and Resources Commission Enabling Resolutions (Resolution Nos. 68-44, 69-35, 71-211, 74-68, and 87-132), which defines the purpose, authority, and responsibility of the Brooklyn Center Human Rights and Resources Commission. Yes No Comments I understand the importance of regular Commission meeting attendance and participation, and feel I have the time available to be an active participant. Yes No Comments Additional comments on my interest, experience, background, ideas, etc. X, } ,7 Ij Signature Date Submit to: Mayor Dean Nyquist City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 APPLICATION FOR APPOIN T TO NORTBIEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION Name ' Age J �� /, Address �� L ��� � C Telephone>Jzk f/60 Occupatio ���' Years lived in Brooklyn Center; �7 I understand the importance of regular Commission meeting attendance and participation, and feel I have the time available to be an active participant. Yes X No Comments jditi7onal comments on my interest, experience, background, ideas, etc. � � , .,LLB --- ,c ature Date Submit to: Mayor Dean Nyquist City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shignle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 3407 62 Avenue North Brooklyn Center, Minnesota October 5, 1987 Mayor Dean A. Nyquist 5701 June Avenue North Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Dear Dean: It is my intention not to seek a renewal to my appointment to the Human Services Advisory Commission of Northwest Hennepin County. These four years of serving in this capacity have been enjoyable: it also has been an educational experience. Please extend my thanks to the City Council for placing their confidence in me. I plan to complete the year of 1987 but should a replacement be found sooner than January, that would be ideal as committee assignments for 1988 are already being made. Sincerely, Frances Gunberg cc: Geralyn Barone Patricia Wilder MEMORANDUM TO: Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection FROM: Gary Shallcross, Planner SUBJECT: Perfnrr?ance Guarantees DATE: December 7, 1987 The following performance guarantees are recommeded for release: 1. Brookdale Corporate Center II 6200 Shingle Creek Parkway Planning Commission Application No. 81012 Amount of guarantee - $10,000 bond Obligor - Ryan Construction Company All improvements are installed. Landscaping is viable. Agreement to relocate access has been filed at the County. Recommend total release. 2. Madsen Floral Townhouses 55th Avenue North and Aldrich Drive Planning Commission Application No. 84001 Amount of guarantee - $10,000 letter of credit Obligor - Reynolds Homes, Inc, All improvements have been installed. Landscaping is viable. An as -built utility survey has been submitted. Recommend total release. 3. Highway 100 Tennis Club Parking Lot 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North Planning Commission Application No. 86003 Amount of guarantee - $10,000 savings certificate Obligor - Northwest Racquet, Swim and Health Clubs All improvements are installed. Landscaping has been relocated with expansion of the off -site parking lot. Agreeement encumbering off - site lot for the sole use of the tennis club has been filed at the County. Recommend total release. 4. LaCasita Restaurant 2101 Freeway Boulevard Planning Commission Application No. 87020 Amount of guarantee - $1,500 certified check Obligor - Barclay Ltd. Development and Construction All improvements have been installed on this small project. Plantings have been relocated and are viable. Recommend total release. Approved b.,� Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection Member introduced the following is resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE OF MARY JO COPELAND WHEREAS, Mary Jo Copeland, a resident of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, is the director and founder of Sharing and Caring Hands Shelter for the poor and homeless; and WHEREAS, she has been selected as one of ten Minnesotans to receive a McKnight Award in Human Service for 1987, presented by The McKnight Foundation; and WHEREAS, her public service and civic effort for the betterment of the community merit the gratitude of the citizens of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that her service to the community should be recognized and expressed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the dedicated public service of Mary Jo Copeland is hereby recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. DEAN A. NYQUIST CITY HALL Mayor CITY 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Res: 533 -0774 OF Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Bus: 533 -7272 :BYROOKLYN Telephone 612/561 -5440 CENTER OFFICE OF THE MAYOR November 28, 198'1 Mr. Jerry Splinter City Manager 6301 Shingle Creek Parkwav Brooklyn Center, MN 554.30 Dear Jerry, While I am not totally sure of all the background information, apparently we have a citizen of Brooklyn Center who has distinguished herself and is receiving an award on the 11th of December. Unfor- tunately, I just received the letter and we will not be meeting as a Council prior to that time. I am therefore wondering if we might be able to put together some kind of a Resolution and have it strictly Mayor's Commendation or by the Council and have the Council ratify it on the 14th. I am planning to attend pursuant to the attached notification, Since ; ely, 2 L Dean A. Nyquist DAN /jn Enc. cc: William Hawes Celia Scott Gene Lhotka Richard Theis (NOT PRINTED AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE) THE McKNIGHT FOUNDATION 410 PEAVEY BUILDING • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE: (612) 333 -4220 November 23, 1987 The Honorable Dean Nyquist Mayor City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Dear Mayor Nyquist: I am pleased to let you know that Mary Jo Copeland of 6924 Halifax Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, has been selected as one of ten Minnesotans to receive a McKnight Award in Human Service for 1987. The Awards, initiated by the Foundation Directors in 1985, provide a $5,000 cash award to the individual recipient. The purpose of the awards is to recognize those individuals throughout the State of Minnesota who are making significant contributions in the human services by directly assisting others to become productive and participating members of the communities in which they reside. The goal of the program is to reward those ersons who minimu P w' m •f public recognition and minimum financial remuneration, are doing the difficult jobs and tasks. Ms. Copeland was selected for her work as the founder and director of Sharing and Caring Hands Shelter for the poor and homeless. To celebrate this occasion, we are inviting you to attend an Awards ceremony on Friday, December 11, 1987. The ceremony will be held in the Nicollet Ballroom Al and A2 of the Hyatt y Regency Hotel (13th Street and Nicollet Avenue in Minneapolis) at 2 :00 p.m., followed by refreshments. We would be pleased if you are able to be there and make a few remarks. We would appreciate your calling our office on or before D us know if December 4th you are able to attend. We will be sending s a to let the media statewide and in your community for use on December lltheaplease hold any other notification to the press until that time. Sincerely, Russell V. Ewald Executive Vice President RVE:cm • ,y�'A n 4 �• ry x S* S0. _ executives -x '�« h s x�e*a, _ xk+� go to see how? z, a n k .. S• 3 '.13' "r' r �"�� }� t � F � - -. , funds will help 0 By Robert Franklin Staff Writer - It was an odd scene: The heiress "a floor - length black coat and tall man in a business suit were being introduced to the clients atj t h yt lrxg+ i = Sharing & Caring Hands shelter people in jeans and parkas, some4, carrying all their possessions in ` backpacks or plastic garbage bags. k 1 ur is ....... Mary Jo Copeland, the founder of F/ the day shelter at 16 Glenwood Av. r N. in downtown Minneapolis, - guided her visitors through the lunchtime crowd of the oor and P Staff Photo by Bruce Bisping homeless, then downstairs and past 'stacks of castoff clothes and small ' Mary Jo Copeland, founder of the Sharing &Caring Hands shelter, basement bathrooms where 80 to hugged Jack Jay after he'd had lunch at the center. a 90 street people shower daily. -' street -worn feet, she talked about tii 4. In a tiny second -floor office, amid the shelter's needs, prayed with her Packag of Dreft used to soak guests r:;; ': hugged them. McKnight continu on page l0A 7 r �v t"1� h 1 t i :i ? "how the leader reacts to these. peo r .s S y ple , t 3 > Continued from page lA He and Binger said they were struck i R. 'I he unannounced visitors were Vir by Copeland's religious conviction r, and somewhat taken aback by her inia Binger, heiress to a 3M Co. ' propensity to hug and kiss everybody 'rortune, and Russell Ewald, an Epis �< in sight .I P¢gpal 'minister. and former Minne ptalis jail chaplain: They are respec • >n 5 iyel s She has a good, deep concern about y president and executive vice helping �' rQ51dent of Minnesota's largest giv P g people,' ' he said. "Here's a person doing very important work t}ng organization, the, $745 million 9 with people most other organizations McKnight Foundation, and their re don't want to work with." m erit visit was typical of one way they z � ike to do business.. At age 71, Binger makes fewer site visits than she used to. Ewald, 67 eOver the years, Binger and Ewald ��3 �rY z said he still makes several hundred have ridden around the Twin Cities'� z visits and meetings a year with oth in police cars, visited hospital emer ? s staff or board members. `gency rooms, food shelves and group a s s for runaways and chemical ,, y, we just try dependty ents,, and invited minori uF�a to up "When I go with Ginn ate ourselves about new organ- � and labor spokesmen to h _ - ^ izations out there or old friends we - lunch, At Sharing' & Caring, they Russell Ewald haven't seen," Ewald said. "If you were responding to a request to help don't take your directors around, you .thc� shelter move when it is displaced During the tour, Copeland told them can't make a basic commitment to by.a National Basketball Association that the shelter's clients include pros - help the poor." arena next spring. titutes, alcoholics and people who . " nnn ..1,,..'r ,, t b Member introduced the following resolution and yo moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1986 -R ( EARLE BROWN FARM STREETSCAPE, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -21 PHASE III STREETSCAPE LIGHTING) WHEREAS, pursuant to written Contract 1986 -R signed with the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, KILLMER ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. has satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance with said contract: EARLE BROWN FARM STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -21 PHASE III, STREETSCAPE LIGHTING NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The work completed under said contract is accepted and approved according to the following schedule: As Approved Final Amount Original Contract $242,401.00 $238,054.78 Supplemental Agreement No.l (1,629.00) (1,654.20) TOTAL $240,772.00 $236.400.58 2. The value of work performed is less than the original contract amount by $4,371.42 due to a general overestimation of planned quantities. 3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvement under said contract shall be $236,400.58. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i CITY � 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 BROOKLYN C P r TELEPHONE 561 -5440 ENTE EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 '10: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer DATE: December 4, 1987 RE: Accepting Work Performed Under Contract 1986 -R Improvement Project No. 1986 -21 Earle Brown Farm Streetscape, Phase III, Streetscape Lighting Attached is a resolution accepting the work performed under Contract 1986 -R, the Earle Brown Farm Streetscape, Improvement Project No. 1986 -21, Phase III Street Lighting. Westwood Planning and Engineering Company has recommended that the City accept the work and approve final payment. Westwood has noted that the underrun is due to an overestimation of quantities and one change in the contract. This project was modified by Supplemental Agreement No. 1 which reduced the size of conduit to better fit into the base of the poles furnished by the contractor. The difference is the result of over reduced final q uantities. The entire savings results from the use of existing handholes and conduit installed for the Shingle Creek Parkway traffic signals at Summit and John Martin Drive. The attached summary prepared by Westwood Planning and Engineering Company provides a detailed explanation of the quantity changes. It is therefore recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution. Res e tfully_xAib mitted, Approved for submittal, H.R. , pu rier Sy iKnapp, C E i eer Director of PublicWo'ks y , .� HS /nl cc: File 1986 -R -4 , Cry M rrftrl '?� " rou w uueiu an - ^' WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY December 9 1987 Bo Spurrier City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 RE: Acceptance of Street lighting Project 41986 -21, Contract #1986R Dear Mr. Spurrier: All work related to the above referenced project has been completed and the system is operational. This work has been tested and reviewed for compliance with City Standards and no differences were found. We recommend that the City of Brooklyn Center accept these improvements as part of the City system The final contract ri e p c is $4371.42 less than the funds encumbered due to our ability to use existing conduits and handholes that were in place at the time of construction. Westwood has completed the final payment documentation for the contractor. However, o ever, we have not completed the final billing to the City for consultant services during the construction phase. This will be completed and transmited to you next week. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY Richard L. Koppy, Vice President RLK:ls 8525 EDINBROOK CROSSING, BROOKLYN PARK, MINNESOTA 55443 (612) 424.8862 (Business Office) 7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55426 (612) 546 -0155 Iac Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1987 -B (WATER TOWER NO. 1. RECONDITIONING PROJECT NO. 1987 -02) WHEREAS, pursuant to written Contract 1987 -B signed with the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, ODLAND PROTECTIVE COATINGS, INC has satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance with said contract: WATER TOWER NO. 1, RECONDITIONING PROJECT NO. 1987 -02 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The work completed under said contract is accepted and approved according to the following schedule: As Approved Final Amount Original Contract $87,100.00 $87,100.00 2. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvement under said contract shall be $87,100.00. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF B:ROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE C ENTER 911 TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer DATE: December 8, 1987 RE: Accepting Work Performed Under Contract 1987 -B Improvement Project 1987 -02 Water Tower No. 1 Reconditioning Attached is a resolution accepting the work performed under Contract 1987 -B, the Water Tower No. 1 reconditioning project. The contract was completed with no change in the contract cost. This contract completes the reconditioning of all three of the City's water towers. The paint system on all three water towers gives them a service life of 15 to 20 years. The work was more difficult because the contractor had to sandblast near a new car lot and near residential development. As a result there were several complaints related to sand damage. The contractor has satisfactorily settled all known claims except one, which was submitted to the contractor's insurance company. AEC, the consulting engineer on the project, has approved the work and recommends final payment. It is therefore recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution. Re ully submitted, Approved for submittal, 42 urrier Sy Knapp, ityEng'neer Director of Public "or s HS /nl cc: File 1987-B rose ui -uanu arr r' Member introduced the following resolution and V moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0, RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION N0, 87 -210 ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1987 -E (BROOKDALE 16 -INCH WATERMAIN, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -03) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: Resolution 87 -210 is hereby amended as follows: 1. The work completed under said contract is accepted and approved according to the following schedule: As Approved Final Amount Original Contract $274,250.88 $259,445.27 Supplemental Agreement No. 1 2,082.12 2,082.12 Supplemental Agreement No. 2 35,500.22 35,500.22 TOTAL $311,833.22 $297,027.61 2. The value of work performed is less than the original contract amount and approved supplemental agreements by $14,805.61 due to a general underestimation of planned quantities. 3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvement under said contract shall be $297,027.61. 4. There is appropriated the sum of $22,776.73 for additional costs. 5. The appropriation will be financed by the Utility Fund. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i CITY ! 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF � BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 BROOKLYN j TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTER I EMERGENCY- POLICE - FIRE 911 I TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer DATE: December 8, 1987 RE: Amending Resolution No. 87 -210 Accepting Work Performed P g Improvement Project No. 1987 -03 Contract 1987 -E Brookdale 16 -Inch Watermain Attached is a resolution amending Resolution No. 87 -210 (copy attached) which accepted the work performed under Contract 1987 -E. The resolution is required because the contractor overlooked quantities when the final payment voucher was prepared. The contractor had not requested the actual total. The correct final quantities result in an increase of $4,290.00. The final contract amount is still $14,805.61 less than the original contract plus supplemental agreements. It is therefore recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution. Res ctful ubmitted, Approved for submittal, H.R. r ier Sy Knapp, City ngin r Director of Public Works HS/n1 enclosures: cc: File 1987 -E rouLU LWRKACn' -� 3 1 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 87 -210 RESOLUTION APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 2, AND ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1987 -E ( BROOKDALE 16 INCH WATER MAIN, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO 1987 -03) WHEREAS, pursuant to written Contract 1987 -E signed with the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, 0 & P Contractors, has satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance with said contract: BROOKDALE 16 INCH WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -03 WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that certain modifications be made to the contract to compensate the contractor for expenses resulting from a suspension of work ordered by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, the contractor, 0 & P Contracting, Inc., has agreed to the prices specified in Supplemental Agreement No. 2: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. Supplemental Agreement No. 2 is hereby approved in the total amount of $35,500.22. 2. The work completed under said contract is accepted and approved according to the following schedule: As Approved Final Amount Original Contract $274,250.88 $255,155.27 Supplemental Agreement No.1 2,082.12 2,082.12 Supplemental Agreement No,2 35,500.22 35.500.22 TOTAL $311,833.22 $292,737.61 3. The value of work performed is less than the original contract amount and approved Supplemental Agreements by $19,095.61 due to a general over estimation of planned quantities. 4. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvement under said contract shall be $292,737.61. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. There is appropriated the sum of $18,486.73 for the additional costs. 2. The appropriation will be financed by the Utility Fund. RESOLUTION N0. 87 -210 November ° , 1987 Date Mayor j ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Rich Theis , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -18 (PAINTING OF THE EAST AND WEST FIRE STATIONS AND LIQUOR STORE NO. 2) WHEREAS, pursuant to written Contract, JMG has satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance with said contract: REFURBISHING WORK AT EAST FIRE STATION, WEST FIRE STATION AND LIQUOR STORE NO. 2, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1987 -18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The work completed under said contract and Supplemental Agreements No. 1 and No. 2 is accepted and approved. Orginial Amount Final Amount Basic Contract $9,900.00 $9,900.00 Supplemental Agreement No. 1 625.00 625.00 Supplemental Agreement No. 2 (664.50) credit (664.50) credit $9,860.50 $9,860.50 2. The value of work performed is equal to the original contract and supplemental agreements. 3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be paid for said improvement under said contract shall be $9860.50. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF B ROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 r� TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C EN 1 ER EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 December 1, 1987 Mr. John M. Gearin JMG Contracting 4523 10th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407 RE: Project No. 1987 -18 Painting Fire Stations and Liquor Store Dear Mr. Gearin: Enclosed are 3 copies of th � p e final payment voucher for this project. Please note that this voucher incorporates the following items: - payment for extra work items in the total amount of $625.00, as per our agreement on 9/14/87 (a copy of my file memo is attached). l i - a deduct in the total amount of 664 50 $ for additional architectural re- inspections of corrective work during the period of October 26 -30, 1987. Before final payment for this project can be released to you, we must receive the following items: Item 1. 2 signed copies of the enclosed payment voucher (please return j to me at this office) Item 2. Delivery of a stock of paint equalling at least 5% of each color used on each building. This extra stock should be delivered in tightly sealed, clearly labeled containers, to Mike Schlosser, Maintenance Supervisor at City Hall. (Note: this is required by the specifications - Paragraph 1.05A of Section 09900). MU WOKAM JMG Contractors Project No. 1987 -18 Page two Item 3. Executed copies of "lien waivers" (see copies enclosed) must be submitted from all major suppliers and /or subcontractors. This specifically includes: - Hirschfield's Paint and - David Latham (Painting subcontractor) This voucher is being submitted to the City Council for approval at their December 14, 1987 meeting. However, payment will not be released until and unless the above requirements are met. Yours very truly, Sy rhapp, Director of Public Works SK /nl cc: Al Mjorud, CMA Mike Schlosser File 1987 -18 18PAY1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER CONTRACT NO. NA 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Project No. 1987 -18 Partial Estimate Voucher No. 3 FINAL For Period Ending November 30, 1987 City of Brooklyn Center to: JMG CONTRACTING 5141 ABBOTT AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55410 TELEPHONE: 922 -6360 Amount of Contract: $9,900.00 Date Approved: August 24, 1987 Project Description: Painting at East Fire and West Fire & Liquor Store ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Value Less Less Funds of Work Charges 0 Less Net Project Encumbered Certified and Percent Previous Amount Number To Date To Date Deducts Retained Payments Due - - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 1987 -18 $9,900.00 $9,860.50 $0.00 $6,764.00 $3,096.50 This is to certify that work items shown on this statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished for the referenced project in accordance with plans & specifications heretofor approved and that the total work is 100% complete. Date: / f �� ,�� :::; ; Project ngineer CERTIFICATION This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge, information & belief, the quantities and values of work certified herein are a fair approximate estimate for the period covered by this voucher. Date: JMG CONTRACTING Hold check and call when ready. Send check to address shown above. I hereby recommend payment of this voucher. Date: Director of Public Works CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 18PAY2 # OF BROOKLYN CENTER Page 2 RTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS NEERING DEPARTMENT Partial Estimate Voucher No. 3 FINAL To: JMG Contracting Project No. 1987 -18 Description: Painting at East Fire & West Fire /Liquor Store ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contract Quantities To Date Item-------------------------------- --------------------- # Contract Item Unit Unit Price Quantity Amount Quantity Amount - - -- ----------------------- - - - - -- - - -- ---- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 1 WORK AT EAST FIRE STATION LS 4,475.00 1 4,475.00 1.00 4,475.00 2 WORK AT WEST FIRE STATION & LS 5,425.00 1 5,425.00 1.00 5,425.00 LIQUOR STORE ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- SUBTOTAL $9,900.00 $9,900.00 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 Add Items (as per 10/15/87 memo to project file - copy attached) 1. Color change at East Fire Station 300.00 2. Painting metal pylon at East Fire Station 125.00 3. Painting metal on roof at East Fire Station 200.00 SUBTOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 $625.00 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 2 Deduct Item 1. Additional architectural reinspection of corrective work during the period of October 26 -30, 1987 (copy of CMA's statement attached) ($664.50) NET FINAL PAYMENT $9,860.50 TO: Project File 1987 -18 FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works DATE: October 15, 1987 RE: Meeting With John Gearin - 9/14/87 at East Fire Station On September 14, 1987 Mike Schlosser and I met with John Gearin at the East Fire Station to review several items, i.e.: Item 1 - Change in color of trim paint at East Fire Station The specifications required that the trim paint match the existing color on the pylon sign. JMG had fairly closely matched the color on one side of the pylon sign. However, Ron Bowman has seriously objected to this color and has designated a different color which he selected. JMG requested $300.00 additional payment to make this change. I agreed to approve that additional payment. Item 2 - Painting The Pylon SiZn at East Fire Station The specifications provided that the pylon sign not be painted. Because of the color change noted in Item 1, JMG offered to paint the pylon sign to match the trim color at a cost of $125.00. I approved this. Item 3 - Painting Metal on Roof of East Fire Station John stated that the specifications do not require that the roof metals be painted and requested additional payment of $200.00 for this work. I agreed that this is a fair price if the specifications do not already require that this could be done. / Note See attached letter from Al Mjorud of CMA, dated 9/14/87 which states that this work is required by the specifications. Accordingly, no rtvi extra payment will be made for this item. Item 4 - Tuckpointing Brickwork at Corners of West Fire Station r JMG offered to do this work for $160.00. I requested that Mike Schlosser look at it and give JMG his decision on whether or not the work �y should be done at that price. Sy Kn Carlson Mjorud Architecture Ltd. 1000 Shelard Parkway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 612/546 -3337 November 11 , 1987 Mr. Sy Knapp CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 RE: Refurbishing Work for East Fire Station, West Fire Station and Liquor Store Dear Mr. Knapp: Based on my conversation with John Gearin of JMG Contracting and an on -site job observation to both fire stations this day, Carlson Mjorud Architecture Ltd. recommends final payment on both projects, since both projects appear to be complete. There is a new scratch on the east door of the East Fire Station, the origin of which is unknown. Before final payment is made, the Contractor is required to submit a list of materials, including manufacturer's name, trade name and data for each prod- uct. This includes all substitutions made during the process. We are not aware that the Contractor has delivered to the City of Brooklyn Center an extra stock of paint equalling 5% of each color used for these two projects. The extra stock should be delivered in tightly sealed, clearly labeled con- tainers. Any guarantee that you have contracted with JMG Contracting should begin this day, November 11, 1987. The accompanying invoice outlines the extra work or reinspections required for corrective work after your directive to JMG Contracting stating this time would be back - charged to the JMG account. This concludes our work on these two projects, unless otherwise authorized by your office. Sincerely, CA LSON MJORUD ARCHITECTURE LTD. Al Mjorud, AIA AM: kb Enc. Carlson Mjorud Architecture Ltd. 1000 Shelard Parkway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 612/546 -3337 Attachment to Letter dated November 11, 1987. Listed below is a breakdown of time incurred -by our office due to inspections and reports for corrective work on behalf of JMG Contracting from October 26 - 30, 1987. A. Mjorud 7.0 hrs. @ $80.00 /hr. _ $560.00 M. Pacholski 2.0 hrs. @ $32.00 /hr. _ $ 64.00 K. Blees 1.5 hrs. @ $27.00 /hr. _ $ 40.50 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $664.50 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTATION AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A NEW LINER FOR THE FILTER TANK FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER SWIMMING POOL (APPROPRIATION WITHIN THE 1988 BUDGET) WHEREAS, The 1988 Budget provides an appropriation of $8,500.00 within the Community Center Division of the General Fund for the purchase of a new stainless steel liner to reline the filter tank for the Community Center swimming pool; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has obtained the following quotations for said installation: Supplier Quotation Lovegreen Industrial Service, Inc. $7,975.50 Valley View Associates $8,506.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The quotation of Lovegreen Industrial Service, Inc. in the amount of $7,975.50 is hereby accepted. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract with said firm in that amount. 2. All costs for said improvement shall be charged to the Community Center Division, Division 66, of the General Fund. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. ESTABLISHING THE FOLLOWING PROJECTS AND ACCEPTING PROPOSAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES RELATING TO THE PREPARATION OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES THEREFORE: IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1988 -01, POLICE DEPARTMENT REMODELING, PHASE III; IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1988 -02, COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II; IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1988 -03, REROOF /INSULATE CITY GARAGE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. The following projects are hereby established and will be designated as shown: Improvement Project No. 1988 -01 Police Department Remodeling, Phase III Improvement Project No. 1988 -02 Community Center Improvements, Phase II Improvement Project No. 1988 -03 Reroof /Insulate City Garage 2. The accounting for the projects will be done as follows: Project 1988 -01 Government Buildings Division 19 of the General Fund. Project 1988 -02 Community Center Division 66 of the General Fund. Project 1988 -03 Government Buildings Division 19 of the General Fund. 3. The sum of $53,287.00 is hereby appropriated from the Capital Projects Fund balance to the Government Buildings Division 19 of the General Fund for use on Project 1988 -01. 4. The sum of $181,220.00 is hereby appropriated from the Capital Projects Fund balance to the Government Buildings Division 19 of the General Fund for use on Project 1988 -03. 5. The estimated project costs will be financed as follows: Project 1988 -01 1987 appropriation to Division 19 of General Fund = $ 4,700.00 1988 appropriation to Division 19 of General Fund = 10,383.00 Supplemental appropriation approved by this resolution = $53,287.00 TOTAL $68,370.00 RESOLUTION Project 1988 -02 1988 appropriations, Division 66 of General Fund: _ tuckpointing and replacement of brick = $34,500.00 painting, insulating & replacing louvers in penthouse = 37.850.00 TOTAL $72,350.00 Project 1988 -03 Appropriation approved by this resolution = $181,220.00 6. The proposal dated November 12, 1987 as submitted by Carlson Mjorud Architecture LTD (CMA) to provide architectural and engineering services related to these improvement projects is hereby approved. Compensation for services rendered by the architect shall be based on the fee schedule as defined in that proposal. The total fees for each of the projects is estimated to be as follows: Project No. /Project Description Estimated Total Fees 1988 -01 - Police Department Remodeling $7,400.00 1988 -02 - Community Center Improvements $9,000.00 1988 -03 - Reroof /Insulate City Garage $8,420.00 The Mayor and City Manager are bereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF B ROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE C ENTER 911 TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works DATE: December 4, 1987 RE: Improvements at Police Department, at Community Center, and at City Garage I. Police Department Improvements - Phase III (a) The 1987 budget for the Government Buildings Division includes the following line item: Redecorate Police Department $ 4,700. This appropriation was intended to cover the costs for repainting the central hallway in the Police Department and for minor renovation of the "booking counter" area. During 1987 the City requested proposals for this work and received only one proposal - which was substantially higher than the budgeted estimate. Since it had become apparent that additional work would be needed within the Police Department in 1988 and that it would be advantageous to do all phases of that work at the same time, no work was completed during 1987. However, the revised estimate for the work proposed for 1987 (including a 15% contingency) is $6,900. Chief Lindsay requests that the following additional work also be accomplished so as to satisfy new needs which have been identified: 1. Remodel fingerprint counter including recessed counter area for Breath- A -Lyzer machine $ 2,375. 2. Relocate radio transmitters, including electrical > outlets > 3. Repaint and carpet squad room > $20,000. 4. Repaint locker rooms > 5. Install new cubicle cabinet > Based on the architect's evaluation, the total cost of the requested additional improvements (not including architectural and engineering fees) is estimated as follows: `" !9A64ll Off -N PP .. -ate Improvements at Police Station Page two Remodel squad room, locker rooms, and service areas (i.e. - items 2,3,4, and 5) ...............$20,000. Fingerprint counter (item 1) ........................ 2.375. SUBTOTAL 22,375. plus 15% contingency 3,355. TOTAL $25,730. (b) The 1988 budget for the Government Buildings Division includes the following line item: Remodel Investigator's Area, P.D. $10,383. Work contemplated under this appropriation includes repainting and recarpeting, installation of a built -in counter and work station, and other minor remodeling in the investigator's section of the Police Department. The architect's current estimate for this work (not including architectural and engineering fees) is as follows: Basic cost estimate . ............................... $ 8,500. plus 15% contingency . ............................... 1,275. TOTAL $ 9,775. (c) In addition, the Minnesota Department of Corrections conducted a survey of the Brooklyn Center Police Department Holding Facility (i.e. - jail area) and submitted their report and recommendations for improvements (see attached report dated July 8, 1987). The architect has estimated that the costs for achieving compliance with these recommendations (not including architectural and engineering fees) is as follows: Basic cost estimate .. ............................... $14,850. Video Security System improvements .................. 1,295. plus 15% contingency ............................ 2,420. TOTAL $18,565. Summary of Proposed Improvements In Police Department Based on conferences with you and Chief Lindsay, I recommend that all work outlined above be incorporated into a single project. Following is a summary cost estimate for all work relating to this currently - proposed project: Originally proposed 1987 project, i.e. - repaint central hallway and booking counter area ................ $ 6,900. Additional items: a. remodeling squad room, locker room, corridor and service areas and related improvements .............. $25,730. b. remodel investigation's area ........................ 9,775. C. remodel jail area, 18,565. d. architectural and engineering fees (proposal from CMA) 7,400. TOTAL $68,370. Improvements at Police Station Page three Since the 1987 and 1988 appropriations for improvements to the Police P Department are not adequate to cover this cost, it is recommended that the additional funds needed be appropriated from the Capital Projects Fund. Alternate Project In the event the City Council prefers to defer remodeling of the Squad Room and Locker Rooms until 1989 or later, while proceeding with the other improvements, the total cost for work in the Police Department would be reduced by $20,000, so that the revised cost estimate would be: a. remodeling corridor and booking counter area........ $ 6,900. remodel fingerprint counter ($2,375. plus 15% contingency) .... 2,730. b. remodel investigation area .......................... 9,775. C. remodel jail area .... ............................... 18,565. d, architectural /and engineering fees (reduced because of reduced project) .. ............................... 6,500. TOTAL $44,470. II. Community Center Improvements The 1988 budget for the Community Center Division incl-rles the following line items: 1. Tuckpoint /Replace Bricks ........................ $34,500. 2. Paint, Insulate and Replace Louvers in Penthouse 37,850. TOTAL $72,350. Item 1 includes replacement of approximately 2,500 bricks, tuckpointing the remaining brick, caulking of joints, windows and miscellaneous openings, high pressure washing of all brick surfaces and application of a clear sealer. Item 2 includes repair and restoration of the interior areas of the penthouses, including (a) the metal roof deck which shows weather corrosion; (b) work on the walls - to reduce damage to walls caused by moisture (freeze /thaw) damage; and (c) installation of new louvers to allow for greater air flow, thereby improving the efficiency and performance of the HVAC system. Following is a summary of the architect's current cost estimate for this Project: Tuckpointing, brick replacement and brick sealing ........ ............................... $28,620. Basic improvements to penthouses ............... 28,100. "Code corrections" to penthouses ............... 2,400. Note: Based on my discussion with our Building Inspector, I recommend sealing the walls with a block filler and 2 coats of vapor resistant paint. We do not believe that the additional $7,000 for insulating the penthouse walls would be cost effective. plus 15% contingency .............................. 8,868. plus architectural and engineering fees ........... 9,000. TOTAL $76,988. Improvements at Police Station Page four Since this estimated total includes a 15% contingency, I recommend that no additional appropriation be made until and unless bids received indicate the need to do so. III. Reroofing and Insulation of City Garage The 1988 budget request included the following item: Reroof /Insulate City Garage $140,250.00 Funding for this item was not included in the 1988 operating budget. However, that budget noted that this project is "to be considered in the Capital Projects Fund Budget." The roof on this 17 year old building has needed repairs several times during the past 5 years. While a major repair could extend the life of this roof by another 5 to 10 years, it is also noted that this roof has minimal insulation. In a report (copy attached) by consulting engineers OL &B, it is estimated that the payback period for installation of insulation would be 5.2 years (this does not reflect the cost of reroofing the building, but only the difference in cost between re- roofing with or without insulation). Accordingly, it is recommended that the existing roofing be removed and replaced, with the addition of insulation. Following is a summary of the architect's current cost estimate for this project Basic cost estimate for a "flat" roof ............. $110,600. Additional costs for adding tapered (or terraced) foam insulation so as to provide positive drainage.. 30,000. Plus 15% contingency . ............................... 32,200. Plus architectural and engineering fees 8.420. TOTAL $181,220. If the City Council prefers to stay with a "flat roof" design, the revised cost estimate is as follows: Basic cost for flat roof ............................. $110,600. Plus 15% contingency .. ............................... 16,600. Plus architectural and engineering fees .............. 8.420. TOTAL $135,620. IV. Proposal for Architectural Services Attached is a proposal from Carlson Mjorud Associates (CMA) to provide architectural services for the above noted projects. CMA is the firm which provided architectural services for the Community Center remodeling projects in 1987. It is my opinion that the services which they provided were excellent in each of the following areas: Improvements at Police Station Page Five Total understanding of the technical requirements of the project, including specific Building Code requirements relating to the work in question; Communication with City staff throughout the development and completion of the project; and Contract administration, including project supervision, handling of documents, and follow -up in all areas. Accordingly, I recommend that the City Council approve this proposal from CMA. A resolution establishing the projects, making the needed appropriations, and accepting the proposal for architectural and engineering services is provided for consideration by the City Council. The resolution as submitted includes the entire remodeling project for the Police Department and the "tapered roof" treatment for the City Garage project. Attached to the resolution are two possible amendments for consideration by the Council. The first amendment would delete the Squad Room and Locker Room improvements from the Police Department project. The second amendment would direct the use of a flat roof in lieu of the tapered roof on the City Garage. Respectfully submitted, Sy app, Director of Public Works v Carlson Mjorud Architecture Ltd. 1000 Shelard Parkway Minneapolis. Minnesota 55426 612/546 -3337 November 12, 1987 Mr. Sy Knapp CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 RE: Statement of Probable Construction Cost Dear Mr. Knapp: Here are the cost estimates that you requested as broken down into the various. projects needed for identification by the City. These projects also include the work of our consulting engineers: Oftedal Locke & Broadston for Mechanical and Electrical work and Rudin Structures for the Structural Engineering required. Even though the very best effort has been made in putting together these cost estimates, Carlson Mjorud Architecture Ltd. would recommend to the City of Brooklyn Center to include a 15% contingency for each of the projects. Note the roofing estimate had to be re- figured since the accepted alternate increased the size of the building as originally calculated. We trust this revised Statement of Probable Construction Costs meets the needs of the City of Brooklyn Center. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, )CAF joru ON MJOR UD ARCHITECTURE LTD. d AIA AM : kb STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST November 12, 1987 PROJECT #87104 -5 PROJECT: Police Department Refurbishing Painting, new flooring, new casework and jail remodeling OWNER: City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Jail Remodeling 1. New security (detention) door at fingerprint room (entrance to jail area). Includes door, frame, glazing, hardware, and electrical control wiring. $ 2,300.00 2. Modification of Cell #3 for use as a group holding area. a -2 Install secure -type table and /or fixed seating for 4 -6 individuals. 1,450.00 3. Cell remodeling at cells #1 and 2. a. Demolish existing concrete block wall in cells #1 and 2, at toilet areas. 1,600, b. New concrete block wall construction and patching at toilet rooms in cells #1 and 2 (match existing construction, complete with reinforcing). 3,200. SUBTOTAL $4,800.00 4. Reclassification and Remodeling of the existing interview /Line -up area to be used as a holding facility. a. Eliminate receptacle, replace concrete block face shell(s) and paint entire wall. 250,. b. Rewire the room's light switch to the exterior side of the room for control by staff. The existing outlet box should be covered with a new security plate. 225. C. Cover the flush floor drain controls with a secure cabinet. 725. d. Replace existing non - secure sprinklerhead with a secure sprinklerhead of a recessed design. e. Remove existing door handle and key cylinder, located on the interior side of existing door to be changed to and be keyed from the exterior side of the door by staff only (commercial hardware, not security hardware). Add three (3) butts with non- removable pins. 600, f. Install toilet and lavatory of a secure type. The privacy partition will be constructed of 8 inch thick concrete block, similar to those in existing holding cells # 1, 2, 3. 3,800, STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST November 12, 1987 Page Two PROJECT #87104 -5 g. Add night light with switch on corridor side. Add one security light fixture in lieu of existing fluorescent lights. This could be a single combination fixture. 500. SUBTOTAL $6,300.00 Jail Remodeling Summary 1. New Security Door 2,300• 2. Group Holding Furniture 1;450. 3. Cell Remodeling 4,800. 4. Create New Holding Facility 6,300. SUBTOTAL $ 14,850.00 Fingerprint Counter Remodeling New stainless steel countertop and face covering for fingerprint counter. Includes recess for Breath- a -Lyzer machine and countertop fingerprint boxes. $ 2,375.00 Investigation Department 1. Reception desk, includes drawer hardware, counter and electrical. 2,500. 2. Painting, flooring, vinyl base and gypsum board wall in reception. 6,000. SUBTOTAL $ 8,500.00 Remodel Squad Room, Locker Rooms, Corridor and Service Areas This work includes: 1. Painting 2. Carpet 3. Vinyl Base 4. Outlets for radio transmittors 5. New cubicle cabinet $ 26,000.00 POLICE DEPARTMENT SUMMARY Jail Remodeling $ 14,850.00 Fingerprint Counter $ 2,375.00 Investigation Department $ 8,500.00 Squad Room and Related Areas $ 26,000.00 TOTAL $ 51,725.00 PROJECT #87104 -5 PROJECT: City Service Garage Reroofing including new insulation OWNER: City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Roof Area: 27,585 square feet. Roof Perimeter: 840 lineal feet. Removal of existing gravel and built -up roofing. $1.10 per sq. ft. Additional insulation and roofing membrane. 2.50 per sq. ft. Subtotal $3.60 per sq. ft. Roof Area x 27,585 sq. ft. Roofing Cost $ 99,306.00 Remodel roof edge to accommodate additional insulation thickness. $7.50 per lin. ft. X 840 lin. ft. Roof Edge Cost $ 6,300.00 Miscellaneous remodeling of roof curbs roof drains to accommodate additional insulation thickness, and construction of overflow scuppers. 5,000.00 TOTAL Roofing Cost $110,606.00 1 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST November 12, 1987 Page Two PROJECT #87104 -5 Roofing Alternate No. 1 Sy Knapp and Al Mjorud (Architect) conducted a visual inspection of the City Garage roof to discover ponded water at several locations. Although the lower chord of the truss appeared to be straight, the upper chord apparently was constructed with a slight chamber. This accounts for the water running toward to roof edge. Unfortunately, the roof drains are located at the high point near the center of the roof. Carlson Mjorud Architecture Ltd. recommends the City consider adding tapered foam insulation to correct the problem. This will then allow the roof water to run toward the drain. Tapered foam insulation: $0.70 /square foot x 27,585 square feet = 19,310. Additional curb height, roof edge, metal flashing, etc. 10,690. $ 30,000.00 Roofing Alternate No. 2 If the structural engineer determines the existing structure cannot support the additional ballast (gravel) and insulation load, then the roofing must either become an adhered EPDM or modified bitumen system. The additional cost for a modified bitumen is offered: $0.50 /square foot x 27,585 square feet = $ 13,792.50 *Note: On November 30, 1987, architect Al Mjorud called to advise that the structural engineer has determined that the roof structure is adequate to support (a) a "Built -Up" roof; (b) a modified bitumen roof; or (c) an adhered EPDM roof. It is not capable of supporting a ballasted EPDM roof, Accordingly he recommends the use of a "Bu i 1 t' Up" roof. SY rPP STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST November 12, 1987 PROJECT #87104 -5 PROJECT: Community Center Building Tuckpointing, brick replacement, and brick sealing OWNER: City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Testing of brick by a qualified testing laboratory $ 2,000.00 Tuckpointing, brick replacement, and brick sealing $ 25,000.00 Subtotal $ 27,000.00 6% One Year Inflation $1,620.00 PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST $ 28,620.00 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST November 12, 1987 PROJECT #87104 -5 PROJECT: Community Center Building Paint and insulate interior, and replace wall louvers at two rooftop penthouses OWNER: City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Penthouse Paintin The scope of work involves painting heavily rusted steel framing and steel deck within the two pent- houses serving the swimming pool. The moist corrosive air has caused damage to the building envelope. The intent is to arrest this corrosion. In addition, a vapor resistant paint will be applied to the inside surface of the concrete block walls. Penthouse preparation /rust removal of steel surfaces. Steel painting of structural members and steel deck: two (2) coats primer one (1) coat urethane Caulking and caulk back up Painting of masonry: one (1) coat block filler 10,000. two 2 coats vapor resistant paint 1,500. Overhead and profit SUBTOTAL $ 11,500.00 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST November 12, 1987 Page Two PROJECT #87104 -5 Replace Four (4) Louvers at Two (2) Penthouses (The mechanical engineer determined the existing air intake and exhaust louvers for the swimming pool air handling system are too small and need to be replaced. The existing louvers are heavily rusted. Two (2) high efficiency galvanized iron louvers approximately 6' wide x 8' high coated with Kynar Two (2) high efficiency galvanized iron louvers approximately 6' wide and 3.5' high, coated with Kynar Saw cut existing masonry Caulking Lintels Demolition of existing ductwork New ductwork transitions Repair existing ductwork insulation 14,400. Overhead & Profit 2,200• SUBTOTAL $ 16,600.00 TOTAL $28,100.00 Penthouse Alternate In lieu of aintin m al masonry walls, P 9 Y ,P rovide insulation and attached vapor barrier to reduce water vapor flow into the masonry and encapsulated steel columns. This will retard surface deterioration of face brick and rusting of columns. Add $ 7,000.00 * Note: after discussion with the City Building Inspector, this alternative is not recommended. Sy Kna STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST November 12, 1987 ARCHITECTURAL /ENGINEERING FEES PROJECT #87104 -5 PROJECT: Community Center Building Tuckpointing, brick replacement, and brick sealing Investigations into proper material selection, Evaluation of Reports, Meeting with City Engineering Department, Preparation of Construction Documents, All work through the Bidding Phase of the Owner /Architect Agreement. (Stipulated Sum) $ 2,500.00 If needed during the construction Phase of this project, it is estimated the,,Architect would make two (2) trips to the job site for the purpose of administering work under this contract. All work, under this phase including the above visits, will be completed on an hourly basis to meet the requirements of the City and the needs of the City's Contractor. (Estimate) $ 600.00 PROJECT #87104 -5 PROJECT: Community Center Building Paint and insulate interior, and replace wall louvers at two rooftop penthouses Prepare construction documents and assist the City in the Bidding Phase of the work. (Stipulated Sum) $ 3,500.00 Construction Phase Administration: If needed, this work would be completed on an hourly basis to meet the re- quirements of the City and the needs of the City's Contractor. $ 2,400.00 PROJECT #87104 -5 PROJECT: Police Department Refurbishing Painting, new flooring, new casework and jail remodeling Retrofit existing construction documents, prepare new construction documents, design work as required, Meet with City Engineering Department to coordinate work, coordinate work with Architect's consultants, and assist the City in obtaining bids. (Stipulated Sum) $ 4,200.00 Construction Phase Administration: If needed, this work would be completed on an hourly basis to meet the re- quirements of the City and the needs of the City's Contractor. $ 3,200.00 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST November 12, 1987 ARCHITECTURAL /ENGINEERING FEES PROJECT #87104 -5 PROJECT: City Service Garage Reroofing including new insulation Structural Engineer to check existing structure for capacity to handle additional loads. (Stipulated Sum) $ 320.00 Prepare construction documents, determine roof edge design, scupper locations, location of contraction joints, accommodate existing mechanical and electrical equipment, and assist the City in obtaiqing competitive bids. (Stipulated Sum) $ 4,500.00 Construction Phase Administration: If needed, this work would be completed on an hourly basis to meet the re- quirements of the City and the needs of the City's Contractor. (Estimate) $ 3,600.00 /Minnesota Department of Corrections - i July 8, 1987 Rochelle Kohagen Brooklyn Center Police Department 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Dear Ms. Kohagen: Based on my, on -site review of the Brooklyn Center Police Department holding facility on Thursday, June 25, 1987, I offer the following comments for your consideration: 1. Currently, the holding facility consists of three secure detention room cell areas which I will / refer to as cell No . i cell No. 2 and cell No. 3. Cells No. 1 and no. 2 area approximately 72 square feet in PP Y q size exclusive of the toilet /lavatory areas directly accessible from such cells /detention rooms. Cell No. 3 is approximately 90 square feet in size exclusive of the toilet /lavatory area directly accessible from same. Simply stated, each of the three detention room /cells is oversized when one considers current DOC square footage requirements. 2. It was noted that cell No. 3, the largest cell, is equipped with a flush_ floor drain and is the cell /detention room area that normally would be utilized for detention of an offender under the influence of alcohol and /or drugs. Cell No. 3's concrete slab for sleeping purposes is equipped with a side -bar frame that may be utilized in conjunction with restraint equipment for restraint purposes. This area was referred to during our conversation as the "drunk tank ". 3. A shower area is accessible from a corridor adjacent to the three detention room /cells. The shower area appeared to be in good condition. It was noted, however, that no prisoner should be showered without direct supervision. The vision panel in the door of the shower should be equipped with a means of insuring the privacy of offenders from staff and /or prisoners of the opposite sex while they are showering. Direct staff supervision is believed necessary and appropriate due to the potential for suicide that may exist with respect to the existing curtain rod. It was unclear to me how much weight such curtain rod would sustain if an offender attempted to hang themselves from same. 300 Bigelow Building•450 North Syndicate Street•St. Paul, Minnesota 55104.612- 642 -0200 M Equal Opportunity Employer e Rochelle Kohagen Page Two July 8, 1987 4. Cells No. 1 and 2 are essentially the same with respect to equipment and furnishings. Both cells are equipped with security hollow metal doors with vision panels and food passes. The size of the food pass opening had been reduced to approximately 1/2 of the original opening by welding of an angle iron on the inside of the door. Both cells were equipped with a concrete slab type bunk, security lighting fixture and a reflector /mirror to minimize the blind spots existent from the exterior of the cell door. Both cells were also equipped with a toilet /lavatory area equipped with a combination toilet /lavatory fixture of a security type. Cells No. 1 and 2 are not equipped with floor drains. Cells No. 1 and 2 are equipped with audio - monitoring and smoke /heat detection equipment which are monitored at the facility's control /dispatch station. It was noted on the day of my visit that the hot water to combination toilet /lavatory fixtures was inoperable. It was unclear as to whether or not the hot water was turned off for repair purposes or whether hot water was provided to toilet /lavatory fixtures in the cell /detention room areas. 5. The equipment and furnishings of cell No. 3 were consistent with those noted for cell No. 1 and 2 with the exception of the flush floor drain and the frame for restraint purposes mentioned earlier. 6. The toilet areas accessible from cell /detention rooms were equipped with doors. As a matter of fact the layout of cell No. 1 lends itself to potential security problems if an offender were to attempt to tie off the cell /detention room door with clothing or linen to the toilet /lavatory area door. 7. All three detention room /cell areas are of interior construction an are without access to natural light. 8. The cell /detention room areas, booking area, interview /lineup area and corridor spaces adiacent to same are all climate controlled. 9. The dispatcher /jailer has no direct visual surveillance of any areas considered a part of the holding facility as noted under No. 8 above. 10. The interview/lineup oom is approximately 86 square feet. No P q toilet /lavatory fixture is directly accessible from this room or included in this room. Rochelle Kohageci Page Three July 8, 1987 11. There are two entrances normally used by law enforcement personnel bringing prisoners in for booking and /or detention purposes. One of these is a door leading to the facility's exterior and the other is a vehicle /sallyport garage. A person gaining access to the facility from either of these may be monitored by closed circuit TV from the dispatcher /jailer station. The arresting officer must move an offender a considerable distance from either of these entrances to the holding area and traffic passed areas that should not normally be accessible from a corridor used for movement of prisoner purposes. 12. A closed circuit TV is used by the dispatcher /jailer to monitor the booking area and corridor, space adjacent to the interview/ lineup room and the, door leading to the three cell /detention room corridor. The closed circuit TV used for monitoring purposes of the holding area has limited utility. The closed circuit TV provides no visual surveillance of cells No. 1 -3 or persons detained within those cells. 13. The lineup /viewing window between the interview /lineup room and the corridor adjacent to cells 1 -3 is equipped with a security screen on the interior side of the interview /lineup room. 14. The interview /lineup room is not normally used for prisoner purposes without direct staff supervision. 15. The dispatcher /jailers normally book and are responsible for the supervision and care of persons detained in cells 1 -3. 16. On the day of my visit all equipment appeared to be in proper working order. 17. I was advised that the normal length of confinement in the Brooklyn Center Police Department holding facility is less than eight hours. However, on occasion persons are held for longer periods of time and in rare instances may be held over a weekend. 18. I was advised that the number of bookings /persons held and processed is on the increase. Department of Corrections data for 1985 indicates 628 bookings. Data for 1986 indicates 623 bookings. Data for the first six months of 1987 will be summarized and available to DOC within the next two weeks for comparative purposes. The on -site review I conducted was at your request for the purpose of determining whether or not an increase in the facility's capacity and /or length of confinement could be achieved through remodeling of existent space or expansion into a portion of the existing squad room. Rochelle Kohagen Page Four July 8, 1987 Based on the above comments, the configuration of the holding facility inclusive of cells, the booking area, the shower area, the interview /lineup room and corridors adjacent to same, I recommend against expansion into the squad room. Secondly, I cannot approve of increased detention time given the existing configuration of the facility and the lack of natural light and an exterior orientation to cells No. 1 -3. - I recommend that no offender be detained for periods of time in excess of 12 hours in the facility. On the positive side, the facility does lend itself to a possible increase in capacity. This could be achieved b3. reclassification of the interview /lineup area for multiple purposes inclusive of administrative hold capacity. This area then could be utilized for detention purposes of offenders, after booking and classification, that are considered by the arresting officer and booking staff person to be of a non - violent /non -risk classification. With the installation of a toilet and lavatory, which could be of non - secure materials, and a privacy partition shielding same from direct visual observation from the exterior side of the interview /lineup room, such lineup room could be used for administrative hold purposes for up to 4 -6 offenders for periods of time not in excess of eight hours. Separation requirements of males from females and juveniles from adults would need to be met if such offenders needed to be detained simultaneously. One advantage of the administrative hold classification that could be attached to this area would be the housing of juvenile runaways for periods of time not to exceed eight hours. Current state law prohibits the detention /incarceration of such offenders in a cell /detention room. If this room were to be used for administrative hold purposes of prisoners I would recommend the installation of a ground fault interrupter on the duplex receptacle located in such room, re- wiring of the room's light switch to the exterior side of the room for control by staff, the covering of the flush floor drain controls with a reasonably secure cabinet and replacement of the existing non - secure sprinkler head with a secure sprinkler head of a recessed design. Finally, issues such as replacement of current light fixtures with security light fixtures and the replacement of non - secure furnishings with secure furnishings could be discretionary on the part of local officials. I would recommend that the door handle and key cylinder on the interior side of such door be removed and the door be keyed from the exterior side only if the room was used for such purpose. Rochelle Kohagen Page Five July 8. 1987 As an alternative to modification of the interview /lineup room it is possible that cell No. 3 could become a group holding area. Modification of such room would require seating capacity for 4 -6 offenders. I would also recommend that such seating capacity be installed in conjunction with a detention type table that could be utilized by persons detained. In the event modifications are considered with respect to either cell No. 3 or the lineup interview room, such modifications should be considered with the understanding that such approval to detain persons in a group holding situation would not be granted for periods of time greater than eight hours. Additionally, Brooklyn Center staff would be responsible for appropriate classification and separation of persons detained to insure legal requirements associated with the separation of males from females and juveniles from adults as well as requirements to insure the safety of one prisoner from another. I trust the comments contained herein will be of assistance to you in better understanding the Department of Corrections position with respect to the existing Brooklyn Center Police Department holding facility and possible renovation of same. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions concerning this letter or desire additional information. Sincerely, Dennis L. Falenschek Detention Program Manager DLF:jml cc: James Lindsay, Police Chief Brooklyn Center Don Omodt, Sheriff Hennepin County Bruce McManus, Deputy Commissioner Community Services Brooklyn Center Police Department File EXHIBIT for ° 4520 /Item 13 �.� OFTEDAL, LOCKE, BROADSTON & ASSOCIATES, INC C O N S U L T I N G EN G I N E E R S ro�!„ 670SEXTON BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55415 raESeu o u r s ` PHONE 333 -4341 AREA CODE 612 President March 25, 1987 Vice President Norman K. Knafla Bruce E. Follestad Mr. Sy Knapp DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center MN 55430 RE: MUNICIPAL SERVICE GARAGE Energy Conservation Measures Dear Mr. Knapp: We have investigated the installation cost and energy savings of various changes to the mechanical systems and the building envelope at the Municipal Service Garage. Those changes that appear to be economically advantageous are listed elow, along with their installation costs /savings /payback estimates. �1. Garage Make -up Air /Exhaust Air S stem This system currently runs 16 hours per day, providing 11,800 CFM of heated outside air to the Vehicle Storage area near the ceiling and exhausting the same volume of air near the floor, in order to prevent the buildup of noxious gases in the Vehicle Storage Area. By installing a carbon monoxide sensor to control the make -up and exhaust fans so they operate only when needed, it may be possible to reduce the gas consumption of the-MUA unit by over 70 %. By using the very conservative figure of a 33% (not 70 %) reduction in operating hours, the installation cost /savings /payback estimate is as follows: Sensor and Controls, installed cost . . . . $ 3000 Gas savings (33% of 1560MCF /yr.@ $4.15 /MCF) . . . . . 2160 /yr. Electric savings (33% of fan motor energy) . . . . . 900 /y r. Simple Payback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Year The way the system operates now, there is a problem whenever the paint spray booth is turned on and the Vehicle Storage area unit heaters are also running. Under these conditions, flue gases from the unit heaters which would normally be vented outdoors are drawn into the Vehicle Storage area, due to the negative pressure caused by the spray booth exhaust fan. The installed cost shown above includes necessary wiring, relays, and interlocks to eliminate this problem, by providing the following operating conditions: a. When the paint spray booth exhaust fan is off (normal operation), the carbon monoxide sensor will control the Vehicle Storage exhaust fan. When the Vehicle Storage exhaust fan operates, the Vehicle Storage make -up air unit fan shall also operate. b. When the paint spray booth exhaust fan is turned on, the Vehicle Storage make -up air unit fan shall operate and the Vehicle Storage exhaust fan shall be locked out. DATE: March 25, 1987 T0: Mr. Sy Knapp City of Brooklyn Center RE: MUNICIPAL SERVICE GARAGE 1. Garage Make-Up Air /Exhaust - / s t Ai r System cont 9 P Y C. Whenever the make -up air unit fan is not running, the make -up air unit burner shall not fire. 2. Vehicle Storage Area Heating System Replacing the existing unit heaters with a more efficient Co- Ray -Vac radiant heating system would result in energy savings and a more evenly heated space. The installation cost /savings /payback estimates are as follows: Co- Ray -Vac installed cost . $ 21,000 Gas Savings (1093MCF /yr @ $ 4.15 /MCF) 4,540/yr Simple Payback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.6 Years If the roof is re- insulated before the Co- Ray -Vac system is Installed, the energy required to heat the Vehicle Storage area will be reduced, and therefore the energy savings of the Co- Ray -Vac system will be reduced proportionately. This will extend the payback period for the Co- Ray -Vac to 5.8 years. 3. Roof Insulation The estimates below are based on adding polystyrene (beadboard), polyurethane, or pol isoc anurate board-typ i Y Y e nsulation with an R- factor f YP o 12. This represents the minimum insulating value needed to make roof mdet the .06 U -value required by the current State Energy Code. Any existing roof insulation that has deteriorated or become wet must be replaced. The cost estimate below is based solely on the installation of new insulation and any modifications to roof curbs, cant, edging treatment, etc., due to the additional thickness. It does not reflect the cost of re- roofing the building, but only the difference in cost between re- roofing with or without additional insulation. The installation cost /savings /payback estimates for the incremental costs of re- insulating the roof are as follows: Insulation installed cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 23,000 Gas Savings 4,400 /yr. Simple Payback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2 years DATE: March 25, 1987 TO: Mr, Sy Knapp City of Brooklyn Center RE: MUNICIPAL SERVICE GARAGE We hope this outline of economical energy conservation measures will help you to make upcoming decisions on budgeting for maintenance and capital expenditures. If you have any further questions about the above, please call us. Sincerely, OFTEDAL, LOCKE, BROADSTON & ASSOC., INC. ,rn Hazucha JH: r MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: James Lindsay, Chief of Police DATE: December 8, 1987 SUBJECT: Brooklyn Center Jail Facilities and Security In reviewing long -range projects considered for the 1990 budget, consideration was given to the jail area. The present jail facilities include a booking area, interview room, shower and three cells. This configuration was designed in 1970 and served our needs at that time. Several problems have developed since then. The department has completed an in -depth review and evaluation of the jail` area. To assist the department we consulted the city's architect, Al Mjorud, of Carlson, Mjorud Architects, Limited and the State of Minnesota's Detention Program Manager, Dennis Falenschek. A review of the problems and their suggested solutions follow: Space or Overcrowding: The number of persons arrested since 1970 has increased considerably. This is the result of both new laws and the increase of activity. We now hold for court appearance all domestic abuse arrests. This with the increased commercial development has added to the number of felony arrests for shoplifting chec k fo credit card for g rY� g , et cetera. DWI's, shoplifting, aggravated destruction of property, et cetera are now gross misdemeanors requiring mug shots and booking. The three current cells hold only one person each. All others must be transferred to the county jail. This takes two officers to perform. One to drive and one for security. This often leaves only one or two officers in Brooklyn Center until they return. The County charges a booking fee of $74.95 for walking a prisoner through the door. In addition the county charges $13.00 plus per quarter day. The cost of lodging a prisoner in the county jail runs a minimum of approximately $100.00. Falenschek's report will allow the conversion of the interview room into a cell. This would require securing electric outlets, locks, et cetera and adding a lavatory with proper ventilation. The large number three cell could be converted into an administrative holding cell. By adding prison type fixed furniture; table and benches, we would be able to place several prisoners in the same cell for periods of eight hours or less. This would involve prisoners waiting for bail, completion of records checks and bookings. These changes would allow us to lodge four people long -term or three people long -term and up to seven short -term. We do not anticipate a large saving of the Board of Prisoners budget account. It should keep it from growing at a fast rate. Memo to Gerald G. Splinter Page 2 December 8, 1987 Security: During 1987 the department experienced two escapes and one attempted suicide. The suicide attempt involved a prisoner using his pants and tying them so he could hook them over the lavatory door and around his neck. Fortunately an officer decided to check on the prisoner. He found the prisoner unconscious. First aid was administered. He was revived and removed to a hospital. Dispatchers are required to check the cells every thirty minutes. All dangerous, injured or sick prisoners are lodged at the county jail as they are equipped for these types. They are usually housed short term at our facility until they can be booked and transferred. Last week we had an aids infected prisoner lodged for approximately four hours until he could be transferred. The security problem is the lavatory of each cell faces the central hallway: For privacy, the State required doors on the lavatory when the cells were constructed. The architect suggested removing the doors, filling in the opening and then opening the lavatories into the cell area. This would remove all ledges that prisoners could use to loop clothing over to use to hang themselves, yet provide the privacy required by the state. The escape problem is caused by having the booking area open to the main hallway of the police department. The two prisoners in separate incidents took off running, following the exit signs out the front door. Both prisoners were recaptured a distance from the building. The solution is to install a new jail type door at the opening into the main hallway. This creates a cell block configuration. As a temporary solution, the Fire Chief has allowed us to lock the glass door separating the administrative wing from the rear area. Someone with a key must be in attendance during the time the door is locked. We lock it only during the time prisoners are in the booking areas. The State Fire Inspector has indicated this will be allowed on a temporary basis only. The new door will separate the booking area from our video camera. This camera allows the dispatcher to view the rear security door before they open it for anyone leaving the building. This camera is also used to video tape all DWI and unruly prisoner bookings. The new camera will be located in the booking room for the recording of bookings. Booking Counter: Presently our handi - talkies are stored in the booking room. Because of court decisions we have moved the intoxilyzer to an investigator's office. Courts have ruled the radio frequencies interfere with the operation of the intoxilyzer. The handi- talkies could not be moved because of the Memo to Gerald G. Splinter Page 3 December 8, 1987 need for special electrical circuits for the chargers. The architect suggested wiring the squad room and moving the radios there. This will allow for the moving of the intoxilyzer back to the booking area. We will then be able to record the intoxilyzer on video tape also. The counter, because of wear, needs to be refabricated. At the same time, it should be remodeled to be recessed to receive the intoxilyzer. The recess will prevent the prisoner from tampering with the machine. Prisoners in the past have attempted to push the machine off the counter. Presently with the intoxilyzer in the investigator's office, the prisoner must sit where he can ,view all the ,listed read outs. They attempt to alter what they are doing to foil the test. This adds additional time to administering the tests. The move will prevent tampering plus allowing the video taping during the administration of the tests. After reviewing all of the above matters and having discussions with Sy Knapp, it was determined that this be brought to your attention with a recommendation that the remodeling occur as soon as possible. The cost of these improvements and Falenschek's report are included in Sy Knapp's memo. Please advise if you need clarification or additional information. 10h To: Gerald G. Splinter From: Brad Hoffman, HRA Coordinator, Date: December 11, 1987 Subject: Recycling Center Contract The resolution before the Council authorizes the City Manager to renew our contract with Goodwill Industries to operate a recycling center located in Brooklyn Park. Under the Joint Powers Agreement (Sanitarian) the Brooklyn Park site serves Brooklyn Center, Crystal, and Brooklyn Park. There are no cost changes in the renewed contract. Our last monthly report (October) indicated that approximately 18 tons were recycled through the' center. Approximately 35 to 40 percent g PP Y P of that came from Brooklyn Center. . Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN A RENEWAL CONTRACT WITH GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, INC. TO OPERATE A RECYCLING CENTER WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center established a recycling center under its Joint Powers Agreement with the cities of Brooklyn Park and Crystal; and WHEREAS, the joint powers group contracted with Goodwill Industries to operate the recycling center; and WHEREAS, it is to the benefit of the City of Brooklyn Center to, continue the operation of the recycling center: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the City Manager is authorized and directed to execute a renewal of the joint powers contract with Goodwill Industries, Inc. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, INC. EASTER SEAL SOCIETY OF MINNESOTA s Ms. Julie Jones November 18, 1987 2543 Como Avenue City of Crystal St Paul, Minnesota 4141 N. Douglas (612) Sas 2591 Crystal, MN 55422 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Laverne Armbruster Dear Julie: Margaret Arnold Roger W. Berg Robert H. Bratnober Enclosed please find the corrected copy of Memorandum of Jacqueline A Bronson Agreement ].Continuance. I made the correction according to the David D. Gross Kermit W. Halden agreement that you sent me. James R. Hartzell William W. Helms I will need to -get the cities of Brooklyn Park and Brooklyn Center James R. Jensen Phillip D. Klone on this agreement. Norman E Lidke Anne T. Ousdigian If you have any questions, please give me a call. Jan Prazak Orem O. Robbins Sincerely, OFFICERS David D. Gross Chairman of the Board E Jan Prazak Erin Ford Vice Chairman Contributed Goods /Recycling Coordinator James R. Jensen Vice Chairman Enclosure: Jacqueline A. Bronson Secretary EF /e Phillip D. Klone Treasurer Norman E Lidke Chaplain James A Dreiling President Accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation facilities Remember Goodwill-Easter Seals in your will Partners in Progress MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CONTINUANCE It is hereby agreed that Goodwill /Easter Seal (hereinafter Goodwill) will pro- vide recycling services to the City of Crystal (hereinafter Cities), City of Brooklyn Park, and City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. The scope of services includes the acceptance of glass, newsprint, beverage cans and household materials. To provide said services, Goodwill will maintain an Attended Donation Center in Brooklyn Park. The facility will be open 2,920 hours per year. The term of this continuance of original agreement is for the year 1988. Goodwill agrees to maintain its liability insurance to cover the Attended Donation Center. The City agrees to pass through the applicable portion of the 1988 Hennepin County Recycling Grant to Goodwill and to provide advice and counsel to Goodwill on the services provided by Goodwill. This Continuance will extend the current agreement with adopted 1988 budget held by Goodwill and the City for and through the year 1988. Signed, City of Brooklyn Park City of Brooklyn Center , John A. Olson, Acting City Manager City of Crystal , Jack King, Vice President Operations ADC3/11.1 Goodwill /Easter Seal ATTENDED DONATION CENTER Budgeted Operational Expenses 1987 Attendant - 8 hours per day, 365 days per year, 2,920 hours x 5.42 (wages) per hour including 14% fringe 15,826.00 Additional Attendant - 8 hours per day Saturday and Sunday for the months of (wages) May, June, July, August and September. 400 hours x 5.42 per hour including 14% fringe 2 1 168.00 Management - training, management, public relations and record- keeping. 8.55 per hour x 140 hours 1 Propane Gas - Gas for heater for eight months of the year. 100 pounds at $25.00 per month (approx.). 200.00 Annual Preventative Maintenance - Trailer check and service of hoses, brake system, lighting, lubrication, tire replacement /repair. 400.00 Miscellaneous Expenses - Informational signage 325.00 Forms, office equipment used on site 100.00 Scaling (weighing, empty and full) $5 a weight x 6 per week x 52 1 TOTAL $21,776.00 NOTE. CRYSTAL'S YEARLY COST (23%) $5,008.48 1987 Operational expenses will be prorated and billed by month @ rate $1,814.67 ADC3 /3.7 IDi Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) DUMP TRUCK (28,000 GVW CAB AND CHASSIS) WHEREAS, an appropriation was approved in the 1988 budget for the purchase of one (1) dump truck (28,000 GVW cab and chassis) ; and WHEREAS, $34,800 was originally appropriated for the purchase of one (1) dump truck (28,000 GVW cab and chassis); and WHEREAS, two bids were received as follows: Company Total Bid Superior Ford $23,898.00 Lakeland Ford $24,592.11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the purchase of one (1) dump truck (28,000 GVW cab and chassis) from Superior Ford, in the amount of $23,898.00 is hereby approved. i Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. J Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF FOUR (4) POLICE PATROL SEDANS WHEREAS, an appropriation was approved in the 1988 budget for the purchase of four (4) police patrol sedans; and WHEREAS, $53,000 was originally appropriated for the purchase of the four (4) police patrol sedans; and WHEREAS, one bid was received as follows: Company Bid Total Bid Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet $11,197.00 each $44,788.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the purchase of four (4) police patrol sedans from Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet, in the amount of $44,788.00 is hereby approved. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: g g whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i ( J RACII JOAR ) Member introduced the followin g resolution and moved its adoption: \ IO RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO tidRITE -OFF UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ---------------------------------------------------- WHEREAS, the City Manager has reported that the following accounts receivables due to the City of Brooklyn Center are uncollectible: NOS!, THEP,EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to authorize the City Manager to write -off from the City records as uncollectible the following accounts receivables: Invoice Name Number Date Amount GENERAL FUND: ' Municipal Probation Restitution 5209 11 -15 -84 $ 43.24 1 Diggs 5237 12 -31 -84 84.50 William Outing 5706 11 -30 -85 42 Bernard McDonough 5779 2 -26 -86 73.50 James Konen 6255 12 -16 -86 28.42 Brian David Schumann Estate 6304 12 -31 -86 190.00 Laurie Arcand 6312 2 -24 -87 64.62 $ 526.71 PUBLIC UTILITIES FUND: MTC Garage 4527 2 -11 -83 $ 1,287.74 i Donna Mae Anderson 5147 10 -29 -84 951.16 Gravely 5 84 4 -8 -85 258.98 � y 3 2 4 �a 64 288 3.5 Jeffrey Roy Sack ster 5 5 9 7 5 $ 3,021.42 TOTAL $ 3 ------------------------ - - - - -- --------------------------------------- Da to Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER SURPLUS FUNDS FROM VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUNDS TO THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND WHEREAS, on October 14, 1968, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center did establish a Capital Projects Fund to provide funds, and to account for the expenditure of such funds, for major capital outlays (which include, but are not limited to, construction or acquisition of major permanent facilities having a relatively long life) and /or to reduce debt incurred for capital outlay: and WHEREAS, the council did resolve that the sources of revenue for the Fund would consist of'ad valorem taxation, transfers by the Council of surpluses of other City Funds, issuance of bonds', interest earnings of the Fund, and from other sources of revenue which, from time to time, the City Council deems to be available for transfer to the Fund; and i WHEREAS, in the development of the Capital Projects Finance Plan in 1968, the Council did determine that surplus funds accrued in certain Special Assessment Funds, which primarily were a result of interest earnings on the investments of the Fund, could and should be transferred to the Capital Projects Fund to be used for major capital outlays; and WHEREAS, there now exists accumulated cash surpluses and residual special assessment receivables in certain Special Assessment Funds; and WHEREAS, all obligations of the above mentioned Funds have been satisfied and no bonds are outstanding in the Funds, and that the accumulated cash surpluses are P rimaril Y a result of the interest earned on the investment of special assessment pre - payments and annual assessment levies; and WHEREAS, the Fund Balance in these funds as of December 31, 1986 were as follows: Special Assessment Fund No. 48(1959AB) 1,087.53 Special Assessment Fund No. 49(1960AB) 965.12 Special Assessment Fund No. 50(1961AB) 141.33 Special Assessment Fund No. 51(1963AB) 532,798.57 Special Assessment Fund No. 52(1965A) 141,125.22 Special Assessment Fund No. 53(1966A) 155,703.69 Special Assessment Fund No. 56(1973) 260,554.33 $ 1,09 2, 375.79 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the above listed Special Assessment Funds be closed and that their remaining cash and special assessments receivable, along with any 1987 revenues or expenditures, be transferred to the Capital Projects Fund. RESOLUTION NO. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER SURPLUS FUNDS FROM VARIOUS DEBT SERVICE FUNDS TO THE CAPITAL PROJECT FUND WHEREAS, on October 14, 1968, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center did establish a Capital Projects Fund to provide funds, and to account for the expenditure of such funds, for major capital outlays (which include, but are not limited to, construciton or acquisition of major permanent facilities having a relatively long life) and /or to reduce debt incurred for capital outlay; and WHEREAS, the Council did resolve that the sources of revenue for the fund would consist of ad valorem taxation, transfers by the Council of surpluses of other City Funds, issuance of bonds, interest earnings of the Fund, and from other sources of revenue which, from time to time, the City Council deems to be available fo'r. transfer to the Fund; and WHEREAS, there now exists accumulated cash surpluses in certain Debt Service Funds; and WHEREAS, all obligations of the above mentioned Funds have been satisfied and no bonds are outstanding in the Funds, and that the accumulated cash surpluses are primarily a result of the interest earned on investments; and WHEREAS, the Fund Balance in these funds as of December 31, 1986 were as follows: Park Bonds of 1957 $ 207,858.49 Library Bonds of 1964 86,946.67 $ 294,805.16 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the above listed Debt Service Funds be closed and that their remaining assest, along with any 1987 revenues, be transferred to the Capital Projects Fund. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken therein, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. lOr� Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER SURPLUS FUNDS FROM THE OPEN SPACE LAND ACQUISITION FUND TO TH CAP PROJE F UND WHEREAS, on October 14, 1968, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center did establish a Capital Projects Fund to provide funds, and to account for the expenditure of such funds, for major capital outlays (which include, but are not limited to, construction or acquisition of major permanent facilities having a relatively long life) and /or to reduce debt incurred for capital outlay; and WHEREAS, the council did resolve that the sources of revenue for the fund would consist of ad valorem taxation, transfers by the Council of surpluses of other City Funds, issuance of bonds, interest earnings of - the Fund, and from other sources of revenue which, from time to time, the City Council deems to be available for transfer to the Fund; and WHEREAS, there now exists an accumulated cash surplus in the Open Space Land Acquisition Fund which is primarily a result of interest earnings; and WHEREAS, all obligations of the fund have been satisfied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the Open Space Land Acquisition Fund be closed and that its December 31, 1986 Fund Balance of $3,898.33 along with any 1987 revenue be transferred to the Capital Projects Fund. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. X00 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE QUOTATION AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) COPIER WHEREAS, an appropriation was approved in the 1988 budget for the purchase of one (1) copier; and WHEREAS, $7,000 was originally appropriated for the purchase of one (1) copier; and WHEREAS, two (2) quotations were received as follows: Company Model Quotation Copy Duplicating Products" Panasonic'FP- 3'040 $6,659.00 Quality Office Products Sharp SF -9510 $7,750.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the purchase of one (1) copier from Copy Duplicating Products in the amount of $6,659.00 is hereby approved. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof. . and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE ACHIEVEMENT OF WAYNE SMITH WHEREAS, over a three -year period, Wayne Smith, 2532 83rd Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, has swam 500 miles in the Brooklyn Center pool; and WHEREAS, this achievement reflects the dedication, skill, and perseverance of Mr. Smith; and WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that the City Council recognizes his accomplishment. NOW, THEREFORE,,, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the achievement of Wayne Smith is recognized and he is hereby congratulated by the Brooklyn Center City Council. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. is Member introduced the following resolution �v and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION AWARDING INSURANCE CONTRACTS WHEREAS, the Director of Finance has negotiated annual renewal premiums for the City's boiler and machinery and liquor liability insurance coverages and they are as follows: The Hartford Steam Boiler Ins P e ction -& Insurance Co.: Boiler and Machinery $2,162 Transcontinental Insurance Company: Liquor Liability (Off -Sale) $1,000,000 Each Common Cause/ $1,000,000 Aggregate Per Store $28,600 NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to accept the negotiated insurance renewals and award contracts as stated; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Jerome Coughlin Agency be designated as the agent of record for said insurance coverages. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Department of Finance DATE: December 10, 1987 SUBJECT: INSURANCE CONTRACTS I have negotiated insurance renewals for the City's boiler and machinery and liquor liability coverages for 1988. The Hartford Steam Boiler and Insurance Company has offered to renew the boiler and machinery coverage for an annual premium of $2,162, an increase of only $63 over 1987 cost. This is a specialty insurance coverage and Hartford is the leader in this field. I recommend that we accept the renewal. The Transcontinental Insurance Company has offered to renew our liquor liability insurance and discount the premium 10% from 1987 rates because of our favorable experience record with them. The total cost for $500,000 each common cause and $500,000 aggregate for each store would be $19,800. This is the same coverage as last year and would cost us $2,200 less. I also asked them for a quote on $1,000,000 coverage per store and a quote on Excess Coverage over the Underlying Coverage. (I have attached my analysis to this memo) . They have offered $1,000,000 per store coverage at a total annual premium of $28,600. That is double the coverage for an increase of $6,600 or 30% over 1987 cost. Excess (or Umbrella) Coverage, which pays after the underlying insurance coverage is depleted, is still very expensive however, as you can see on my analysis. I would not recommend it at this time. I recommend that we accept their offer of $1,000,000 per store coverage at a total premium of $28,600. I have also attached a resolution which would award the insurance contracts. The resolution is on the December 14th City Council agenda. I am currently working on the renewals with LMCIT for liability, property, and workmen's compensation insurance coverages. I will report to you as soon as I get renewal quotes. Paul W. Holmlund Director of Finance lm Attachments (WWALLIR) ANALYSIS OF LIQUOR LIABILITY INSURANCE RENEWAL PROPOSALS FROM TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND PROPOSALS FOR EXCESS INSURANCE COVERAGE FROM GENERAL STAR INSURANCE CO. (SUBMITTED BY JOHN H. CROWTHER, INC., AGENT) Store No. 1 Store No. 2 Store No. 3 Total Humboldt Boulevard Northbrook Stores A. BASED ON ESTIMATED SALES OF: $ 800,000 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 $ 2 B. 1987 POLICY 1. Limits of Liability: a. Each Common Cause $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 N/A b. Aggregate $ 500,000 $ 500 $ 500,000 N/A c. Premium: $1.00 per $100 of Sales $ 8 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 22,000 ----------- --- ---------------------------------- C. 1988 RENEWAL OF POLICY (TRANSCONTINENTAL) --------------------------------------------- 1. Limits of Liability: a. Each Common Cause $ 500 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 N/A b. Aggregate $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 N/A c. Premium: $0.90 per $100 of Sales $ 7,200 $ 6,300 $ 6,300 $ 19,800 ----------- -- ---------------------------------- 2. Limits of Liability: a. Each Common Cause $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 N/A b. Aggregate $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 N/A c. Premium: $1.30 per $100 of Sales $ 10,400 $ 9,100 $ 9,100 $ 28,600 ---- ---- ---------------------------------------- D. 1988 EXCESS COVERAGE PROPOSAL (GENERAL STAR) ---------------------------------------------- 1. Limits of Liability: a. Excess of $500,000 Underlying Insurance Coverage $ 2 b. Premium: a. $1.49 per $100 of Sales $ 11,920 $ 10,430 $ 10 $ 32,780 ------------------------------------------------ 2. Limits of Liability: a. Excess of $1,000,000 Underlying Insurance Coverage $ 2,000,000 b. Premium: $1.01 per $100 of Sales $ 8,080 $ 7,070 $ 7,070 $ 22,220 3. Limits of Liability: a. Excess of $1,000,000 Underlying Insurance Coverage $ 4 b. Premium $1.37 per $100 of Sales $ 10,960 $ 9,590 $ 9,590 $ 30,140 ------------------------------------------------ 4. Limits of Liability: a. Excess of $500,000 UIC $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 N/A b. Excess of $1,000,OOOUIC $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 N/A c. Premium (a) or (b): - ---- $1.60 per $100 of Sales $ 12,$00 $ 11,200 $ 11,200 $ 35,200 ------------------------------------ - - - - -- - 5. Limits of Liability: a. Excess of $1,000,OOOUIC $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 N/A b. Premium: $1.09 per $100 of Sales $ 8,720 $ 7,630 $ 7,630 $ 23,980 ------------------------------------------ - - - - -- 0,4 Member Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR THE RELOCATION OF A STORM SEWER WITHIN THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS BETWEEN LOTS 46 AND 47 BLOCK 6 PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. The proposed agreement between James P. Andrescik and Joan K. Andrescik, husband and wife; and Twila Rubenstein, a single person; and the City of Brooklyn Center to resolve the conflicts resulting from the intrusion of the houses located at 5806 Halifax Avenue North and at 5812 Halifax Avenue North into the existing public utility easements is hereb y approved. 2. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF B ROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 EMERGENCY- POLICE- FIRE C ENTER 911 TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works DATE: November 16, 1987 RE: ANDRESCIK /RUBENSTEIN /CITY Storm Sewer Bypass Attached hereto is a revised copy of the proposed agreement which includes two changes which the City Council informally approved at the November 9, 1987 Council meeting, i.e.: - on page 4, paragraph 5 has been changed to require a $19,400.00 Letter of Credit instead of the $29,100.00 Letter of Credit shown in previous copy; - on page 5, paragraph 8 has been added, wherein the City assures ANDRESCIK and RUBENSTEIN that, in the event the bypass sewer is ever abandoned (as a result of constructing the replacement storm sewer as described in the Westwood study, or for any other reason), no special assessments will be levied against their properties. It is recommended that the City Council continue to withhold approval of any of the other items relating to resolution of the conflict (i.e. - adoption of the ordinance vacating the portions of the easements under the two houses, approval of the setback variance, and approval of the platting variance) until this agreement is finalized and executed by ANDRESCIK and RUBENSTEIN, and ANDRESCIK submits the required new easement and the Letter of Credit. Respectfull submitted, December 14, 1987 Sy am pp F. Note: We have now received the signed agreement, the executed easement, and the Letter of cc: Andrescik Credit. These items have been reviewed by Rubenstein the City Attorney and approved by him. Accordingly, I recommend approval of the agreement and other items relating to this matter. , �• Sy Knapp, X of Public Works CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY B ROO o K LYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 EMERGENCY- POLICE - FIRE C ENTER 911 TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works DATE: November 4, 1987 RE: Consideration of Items Relating to Lots 46'and 47, Block 6, Pearson's Northport 3rd Addition. (i.e. - 5806 and 5812 Halifax Avenue North) Five items relating to the resolution of conflicts resulting from the intrusion of the houses located at 5806 and 5812 Halifax Avenue North into the existing public utility easement are included on the City Council agenda for 11/9/87. These items and my comments regarding them are as follows: A. Resolution accepting Engineer's report regarding Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 1987 -22. A copy of the report from the Westwood Planning and Engineering Company is submitted herewith. This report includes the following two significant conclusions: 1. The estimated cost for consideration of a 30 inch diameter bypass storm sewer between the two houses is $19,400. This cost estimate includes contract costs for construction of the bypass sewer with appurtenances; contract costs for filling the existing storm sewers, before they are abandoned in � lace so as to prevent future cave-ins; and contract costs P for landscape repairs. This estimate does not include the costs for construction a prepar c n su ervision le al and pl n c p g administrative costs or capitalized interest costs. 2. The report concludes that, instead of oversizing the bypass sewer, and oversizing the entire downstream sewer system at the some future date, the City should construct a "relief storm sewer" following the street system to "Northport Lake ". It is my opinion that this is an excellent recommendation, since the problems associated with oversizing or replacing the existing storm sewers (located in the back yard and on side yards of 16 homes) would be immense. Westwood has estimated that the cost of this �" 1961 LL141ltIG QR -•� . Consideration of Items Relating to Lots 46 and 47 November 4, 1987 Page two relief storm sewer will be approximately $250,000 to $300,000. This is an item that should be considered sometime in the future, in conjunction with the development of plan for upgrading the City's storm drainage system, and compliance with the "Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act" which will require development of a "local plan" complimentary to the plan now being developed by the Shingle Creek Watershed Commission. Under the terms of the Surface Water Management Act, that local plan must be developed by or during calendar year 1989. In any event, this recommendation eliminates the need to consider oversizing the currently proposed bypass sewer. I recommend that the Westwood report be accepted by resolution. B. Resolution approving agreement for the relocation of a storm sewer within the public utility easements between Lots 46 and 47, Block 6, Pearson's Northport 3rd Addition. Submitted herewith is a draft copy of an agreement between Andrescik, Rubenstein and the City which I have prepared in consultation with the City Attorney. It is my belief that this agreement reflects the direction we have previously received from the City Council; that approval of this agreement would provide a proper basis for resolution of the existing conflicts, and that the proposed cost distribution is equitable. Copies of this proposed agreement are being delivered to Mr. and Mrs. Andrescik and to Mrs. Rubenstein today (November 4, 1987) in hope that they will have adequate time to review the proposal and react to it. However, it may well be that they will need additional time to review the agreement and to get needed approvals. (I believe that Mr. and Mrs. Andrescik will need to get the approval of the agreement and the temporary easement from the lending agency which is providing financing for the people who are buying their house. Also, both parties may well wish to have their attornies review the agreement, and Mr. and Mrs. Andrescik need to make arrangements to provide the financial security required by the proposed agreement). Accordingly, it may not be possible to proceed with approval of this agreement at the November 9, 1987 Council meeting. However I do that the proposed agreement be discussed at that that time so t recommend requested b if changes are q y the City Council, the can be made Y so that the final agreement can be approved at the November 23, 1987 Council meeting. g C. Ordinance vacating portions of the public utility easements located on Lots 46 and 47, Block 6, Pearson's Northport 3rd Addition. Consideration of Items Relating to Lots 46 and 47 November 4, 1987 Page three D. Planning Commission application No. 87023 submitted by James Andrescik requesting a variance from section 35 -400 of the zoning ordinance to allow a zero setback for an attached garage presently built over the side property line and a storm sewer easement. This item was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its October 15, 1987 meeting. E. Planning Commission application No. 87024 submitted by James Andrescik requesting a variance from the subdivision ordinance to allow a land transfer by metes and bounds division `rather than than formal platting. This item was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its October 15, 1987 meeting. These three items should all be considered in concert with the proposed agreement. The public hearings should be conducted on November 9, 1987. However, if the agreement is not ready for approval, adoption of these 3 items should be tabled - for consideration when the final agreement has been prepared and executed by the Andrescik's and by Rubenstein. Respectfully submitted, Sy Knapp Director of Public Works AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year set forth hereinafter, by and between James P. Andrescik and Joan K. Andrescik, husband and wife, hereinafter referred to as "ANDRESCIK "; and Twila Rubenstein, a single person, hereinafter referred to as "RUBENSTEIN "; and the City of Brooklyn Center, a municipal corporation in the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "CITY ", witnesseth that: WHEREAS, ANDRESCIK is the owner of certain real property lying and being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as: Lot 46, Block 6, Pearson's Northport 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota commonly known as 5806 Halifax Avenue North Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as " ANDRESCIK" Property; and WHEREAS, RUBENSTEIN is the owner of certain real property lying and being in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as: Lot 47, Block 6, Pearson's Northport 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota commonly known as 5812 Halifax Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "RUBENSTEIN Property; and WHEREAS, there exist public utility easements across the Northerly 15 feet of the ANDRESCIK Property and across the Southerly 15 feet of the RUBENSTEIN Property, as described in the plat and dedicated in Pearson's Northport 3rd Addition, Book 1134 of Plats, page 1; and -1- WHEREAS, the CITY has previously constructed one 1$ inch diameter storm sewer pipe and one 24 -inch diameter storm sewer pipe within the limits of the public utility easements; and WHEREAS, the house constructed on the ANDRESCIK Property has encroached into the public utility easement and is located above both of the CITY'S storm sewers; and WHEREAS, the house constructed on the RUBENSTEIN Property has encroached into the public utility easement; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of all parties hereto to resolve and redefine the easement and to eliminate these encroachment problems; and WHEREAS, which, S the CITY as consideration of an ordinance h h initiated con , adopted, will vacate those portions of the easements which lie under the two houses; and WHEREAS, the CITY has conducted a study which proposes to replace the existing storm sewers by constructing a new 30 inch diameter bypass storm sewer within the remaining portions of the public utility easements, as shown in "Figure 6 - Schematic of Proposed Replacement Storm Sewer" as prepared by the Westwood Planning and Engineering Company, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. -2- NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: 1. That, prior to adoption of the ordinance vacating those portions of the public utility easements which lie under the two houses, ANDRESCIK will grant to the CITY a temporary easement (see Exhibit B attached) which will allow the continued operation and maintenance of the existing storm sewers until such time as the proposed bypass storm sewers are constructed and placed into full operation. 2. That the CITY will adopt the ordinance vacating those portions of the existing public utility easements which lie under the two houses. 3. That the CITY will prepare plans and specifications for construction of the proposed bypass storm sewer, will advertise for bids for said improvement, and will award a contract for construction of said improvement to the lowest responsible bidder, all in accordance with laws relating to municipal construction contracts. Said contract shall require completion of the improvement on or before September 15, 1988. Work to be completed under this contract shall include filling those portions of the existing storm sewers which are to be abandoned and left in place and shall include repair or restoration of existing landscape features (i.e. topsoil and sod, plantings, fences, retaining walls, etc.) which are damaged or destroyed. In addition, the contract shall also -3- require the contractor to take all precautions necessary to prevent damage to existing structures, real properties or personal properties, and to purchase and maintain a policy of insurance which will protect him and the CITY from any claims which may arise out of or result from the contractor's operations under the contract. 4. That ANDRESCIK will reimburse the CITY for all costs incurred for work completed under the construction contract (current cost estimate — $19,400.00). Other costs, including engineering, legal and administrative services and capitalized interest costs (current cost estimate — $2,350.00) will be paid by the CITY without reimbursement from either ANDRESCIK or RUBENSTEIN. 5. That ANDRESCIK, in order to assure reimbursement of the CITY'S costs for construction of the bypass storm sewer, hereby submits an Irrevocable Letter of Credit (see Exhibit C attached) in the total amount of $19,400.00 which is equal to the estimated contract amount. The CITY'S claims for payment from said letter of credit shall be limited to reimbursement for construction contract payments. Upon completion of the project and receipt of full reimbursement for construction contract payments the CITY will authorize release of the letter of credit. 6. That ANDRESCIK and RUBENSTEIN hereby waive any claim for liability which they may believe the CITY has incurred as a result of -4- previous action(s) of the CITY relating to acquisition of the existing easements, installation of the existing storm sewers, issuance of building permits, or any other action which relates to the development and existence of current conditions. 7. That ANDRESCIK hereby waives any claim for loss of damage which may occur in the future as the result of the abandonment inplace of those portions of the existing storm sewer which are to be bypassed under the terms of this agreement. Upon termination of the CITY'S temporary easement described in paragraph 1 thereof, all right, title and interest of the CITY to that portion of the storm sewer pipes lying within the area of said easement shall cease and said portion of storm sewer pipes shall become and remain the property of the owners of the ANDRESCIK Property, and the CITY shall have no further right, title or interest therein or responsibility therefor. 8. That, in the event the bypass storm sewer which will be constructed in accordance with the terms of this agreement is ever removed from service as a result of future changes to the City's storm -sewer system, the City will either remove that bypass storm sewer, or fill it in a way which will prevent possible cave -ins. No portion of the costs for removing the pipe or of filling the pipe and abandoning it inplace, including restoration, landscaping and other costs incidental thereto will be charged to either ANDRESCIK or RUBENSTEIN in the form of special assessments to these properties. -5- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands this o� /5i day of kny . 1987. ANDRESCIK by O a , r ( James P. r� rescik .f and by __ ( � ,itC��l J/ Joan K. Andrescik RUBENSTEIN by Twi:la Rubenstein CITY by Dean Nyquist, Mayor and by Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager -6- r r - r PROPOSED REPLACEMENT STORM SEWER N A 0 5 5812 DRAINAGE B UTILITY EASEMENT r No Scale - FENCE — EXISTING STORM SEWE \�\ ON PROPERTY LINE r- ............ o_ G a 5806 --- - - - - -- - - -- °----- - --�\ EXST'ING STORM SEWER \ i r K FENCE ON LINE m X p -a n SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED REPLACEMENT STORM SEWER I, J ENG EEq HO AN1 FIG URE URE 6 ' r�l/ w�YLt! wua [vino, Ywh��loli YK wa .s whY - - - -- -- - - - -- EXHIBIT A IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. Dated this 25th day of November 1987 AMOUNT $ 19, 500.0 TO: City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430, hereinafter called the City. FROM: Mp Building Trades Cr. Union ( insert name and address of 31 Central financial institution) Mi nneapolis MN. 55414 , hereinafter called the Bank. RE: James P. and Joap K. Andrescik, ,5806 Halifax Ave., N. Brooklyn Center, MN 55430, hereinafter called the Developer. The City is a Municipal Corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota and on the day of >,�';f , 19. approved the following project: Construction of a new storm sewer and abandonment of (� existing storm sewer between 5806 Halifax Avenue North and 5812 Halifax Avenue North in Brooklyn Center. As a condition of such approval, the City has required the execution by the Developer of an Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment One, (the "Agreement ") and has required a Financial Guarantee to insure the construction described in the Agreement. The Developer has made application to the Bank for a letter of credit, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, to be used as the said Financial Guarantee. The Bank is chartered to conduct bank business within the State of Minnesota at the address above indicated, and is empowered to issue letters of credit. By the signature of Richard Mankowski , Commercial Loan Officer of the Bank endorsed hereon, this document is an irrevocable letter of credit under the Uniform Commercial Code, MSA 11336.5. This letter of credit shall remain irrevocable until cancelled by one of the following methods: 1) By appropriate written cancellation executed by proper officials of the City of Brooklyn Center; 2) At any time after the project completion date, the day of / - tw the Bank may serve the City by certified mail, its written intention to cancel this letter of credit. Cancellation shall be effective on the 31st day after notice of cancellation is received. EXHIBIT B Any Docu: Demand for Payment delivered to the Bank within the said thirty -(30) day period shall be honored under this letter of credit, regardless of anv extensions of time previously granted by the City to the Developer beyond the above -named date. Upon delivery by Registered Mail of a Documentary Demand for Payment at the office of the Bank above described, the Bank will, on or before the fourth ( 4th) business day after such delivery, Pay to the City by Registered Return Mail, the amount demanded in the Documentary Demand for Payment, not to exceed the amount of this letter of credit above stated. The Documentary Demand for Payment shall consist of the following documents: 1) The Agreement signed by the Developer and the City, tocether with the Minutes of the City Council meeting approving the pZoject. 2) A certificate signed by the City Manager stating that reimbursement is due under the terms of the Agreement and the amount thereof. Any funds received by the City pursuant to this letter of credit shall be used only for the improvements described herein, but including legal, engineering, planning and other administrative costs, if any, incurred by the City in exercising its rights under this letter of credit. Any excess funds remaining on deposit with the City after completing the improvements, after subtracting the legal, engineering, planning and other administrative costs, if any, shall be returned to the Bank. Yours truly, \,_CO,mmercial Loan Officer 0007ILO1.E19 2 EASE !ENT THIS AGREEMENT made this , i% day of �z�'LC�/�'.G /ice 1987, between James P. Andrescik and Joan K. Andrescik, husband and wife, party of the first part, and the City of Brooklyn Center, a Minnesota municipal corporation, party of the second part; WITNESSETH: That the p arty of the first part in consideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION to it in hand paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant and convey unto said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, the following described temporary easement lying over, under, across and through part of the below described parce, of land lying and being in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to -wit: DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL: Lot 46, Block 6, Pearson's Northport 3rd Addition, according to the plat on file of record in 'the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and that part of Lot 47, Block 6 of said Pearson's Northport 3rd Addition, Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 46, Block 6, Pearson's Northport 3rd Addition, thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 21 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the North Line of said Lot 46 a distance of 47.73 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 21 seconds East, along the south line of said Lot 47, a distance of 11.15 feet; thence North 3 degrees 06 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 0.60 feet; thence South 86 degrees 54 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 11.14 feet to the point of beginning. EXHIBIT C DESCRIPTI011 OF EASE24ENT A temporary drainage and utility easement for the maintenance, repair and operation of storm sewer pipes lying over, under, across and through that portion of the above parcel described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 46, thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 21 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the North line of said Lot 46 a distance of 47.73 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 21 seconds East, continuing along said North line, a distance of 29.16 feet; thence South 03 degrees 06 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 15.62 feet to the south line of said drainace and utility easement;, thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes 21 seconds Pest along said south line, a distance of 43.54 feet; thence North 3 degrees 06 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 14.25 feet; thence North 86 degrees 54 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 14.35 feet to the point of beginning. Together with that part of Lot 47, Block 6, said PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION described as beginning at the above described point of beginning; thence North 89 de 58 minutes 21 seconds East, along the south line of said Lot 47, a distance of 11.15 feet; thence North 3 decrees 06 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 0.60 feet; thence South 86 degrees 54 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 11.14 feet to the point of beginning. Said easement shall run until /, /1 and then terminate. Upon termination of this easement, all right, title and interest of the City to that portion of city storm sewer pipes lying within the easement area shall cease and said portion of the storm sewer pipes shall become and remain the property of the owners of the easement area, and the City shall have no further right, title or interest therein or responsibility therefor. This Instrument Drafted By: State Deed Tax Due Herein: LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy, $ O'Brien & Drawz a Professional Association 2000 First Bank Place West Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 2 R IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the carries have hereunto set their hands this day of 19 U 41V ames P. Anc"res'cik Joan K. Andrescik L STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Ax,x�' �rtj- A, , 1987, by James P. Andrescik and Joan K. Andrescik, husband and wife. Notary Public C 0100 F-P-0000000 .@ KATHLEEN M. SELLAND I NOTARY PUBUC•MiNNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY My Commission Expires Nov. 0.1000 0007EZO1.E19 3 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of at P.M. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider An Ordinance Vacating An Easement in Lots 46 and 47, Block 6, PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 561 -5440 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE VACATING PORTIONS OF THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS LOCATED ON LOTS 46 AND 47, BLOCK 6, PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following described drainage and utility easements in Lots 46 and 47. Block 6. PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION, according to the plat on file of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota are hereby vacated: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 46, thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 21 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the North line of said Lot 46 a distance of 47.73 feet to the actual point of beginning: thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 21 seconds East, continuing along said North line, a distance of 29.16 feet: thence South 03 degrees 06 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 15.62 feet to the south line of said drainage and utility easement: thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes 21 seconds West along said south line, a distance of 43.54 feet: thence North 3 degrees 06 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 14.25 feet: thence North 86 degrees 54 minutes 00_seconds East, a distance of 14.35 feet to the point of beginning. Together with that part of Lot 47 Block 6 said PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 3RD_ ADDITION described as be ig nning at the above described point of be ig nning: thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 21 seconds East, along the south line of said Lot 47 a distance of 11.15 feet: thence North 3 dezrees 06 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 0.60 feet: thence South 86 degrees 54 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 11.14 feet to the point of beginning. And tcrether with that part of Lot 47 Block 6 said PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION described as beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 47, North 89 degrees 58 minutes 21 seconds East assumed bearing, along the south line of said Lot 47 a distance of 32.09 feet: thence North 00 degrees _ 01 minutes 39 seconds West a distance of 9.52 feet to the actual point of beginning: thence North 02 degrees 53 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 5.49 feet to the north line of said drainage and utility easement: thence_ North 89 degrees 58 minutes 21 seconds East along said North line, a distance of 25.53 feet; thence South 02 degrees 53 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 4.21 feet: thence South 87 degrees 06 minutes 20 seconds West, a distance of 25.50 feet to the point of beginning. ORDINANCE NO Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of , ' Mayor ATTEST: Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date �a MEMO TO: Chair and Members of the Charter Commission FROM: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager DATE: November 10, 1987 SUBJECT: Suggested Charter Amendment Relating to a Full -time Fire Chief As you may be aware, the City Council, as a part of their consideration of the 1988 Annual City Budget, has proposed the creation of a position of full -time fire chief. This request came from the fire department through the City Manager's Proposed Budget and to the City Council for its consideration and approval. During the evaluation of this request, a review of the City Charter indicates there is a potential conflict with the current City Charter and the appointment of a full -time fire chief. Section 6.02, Subd. 3. (b) states, The fire chief shall be a volunteer who shall be appointed pp d from the members of the volunteer fire department." The city Y attorne has stated that the term "volunteer" used in this section conflicts with the fact of paying someone for the duties and responsibilities of the fire chief. Technically speaking, the current situation in which we are paying approximately $7,000 for the services of a part -time fire chief does violate this section of the Charter. The City Council is requesting your consideration of an amendment to the City Charter which will allow for the removal of the reference to volunteer in appropriate sections of the Charter, thus allowing the City to pay for services of the fire chief. As some of you may be aware, the issue of a full -time fire chief was a very politically sensitive issue a little over 10 years ago. The City Council is most interested in seeing that any changes proposed in the Charter have as thorough a public hearing process as is possible. At this time you should understand that the proposal for a full -time fire chief has the support of the City Council, City staff, and the fire department. I will be available at your next Charter Commission meeting to discuss this proposal and answer any questions you may have. A copy of a city attorney's letter reviewing alternative methods of amending the Charter is attached. The City Council has initially expressed a preference for charter amendment by ordinance, if you concur. cc: Mayor & Council Members Ron Boman Geralyn Barone Carole Blowers Lc crc Lei lcr . hc►uIcdN I)I-a a Professional Association 2000 First Bank Place West November 5, 1987 Minneapolis Minnesota 55402 Telephone (612) 333 -0543 Telecopier (612) 333 -0540 Ms. Geralyn Barone Clayton L. LeFevere Personnel Coordinator Herbert P. Lefler J. Dennis O'Brien City of Brooklyn Center John E. Drawz 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway David J. Kennedy Brooklyn Center, M14 55430 Joseph E. Hamilton John B. Dean Glenn E. Purdue Re: Charter Amendment Procedure Richard J. Schieffer Charles L. LeFevere Bear MS Barone • Herbert P. Lefler III James J. Thomson, Jr. Thomas R. Galt You have asked for a description of the procedure to be Dayle Nolan followed in the adoption of a charter amendment by John G. Kressel p Steven B. Schmidt ordinance. There are two means of accomplishing such an *� M. Strommen amendment. The first involves the initiation of a Ild H. Batty r P. Jordan charter amendment by the City Council. Under Minnesota ti 1 ,. am R.Skallerud Statutes, §410.13, subd. 5. The steps in this procedure Rodney D. Anderson are as follows • Corrine A. Heine David D. Beaudoin Paul E. Rasmussen 1. The City Council adopts an ordinance to submit a Steven M. Tallen proposed charter amendment to the voters. Mary Frances Skala Christopher J. Harristhal Timothy J. Pawlenty 2. The ordinance is submitted to the Charter Commission Rolf A,Sponheim for review and comment (which may take up to 150 Julie A. Bergh days) . 3. The Charter Commission makes its report to the City Council either approving or rejecting the proposed amendment or suggesting a substitute amendment. 4. The Council submits the question of the charter amendment to the voters. This may be either the original proposed amendment or a revision suggested by the Charter Commission. 5. An election is held following at least two weeks published notice. If 51% of the votes cast are in favor of the amendment, the amendment passes and is filed with the Secretary of State and County Recorder. The amendment becomes effective 30 days after the election, unless a later time is specified in the ordinance. Pas. Geralyn Barone November 5, 1987 Page 2 The more streamlined and less expensive procedure would be for the Charter Commission to recommend the enactment of an ordinance under Minnesota Statutes, §410.12, subd. 7, by unanimous adoption of an ordinance without an election. The steps in this procedure are as follows: 1. The Charter Commission recommends adoption of a charter amendment by ordinance. 2. In response to the recommendation of the Charter Commission, the City Council holds a public hearing on two weeks notice which contains the text of the proposed amendment. 3. The Council adopts the proposed amendment by unanimous vote. The ordinance is then published, filed with the Secretary of State and County Recorder and becomes effective 90 days after passage and publication, or any later date which is specified in the ordinance. Under this second procedure there is generally no election, although the matter is subject to a reverse referendum on the petition of qualified voters equal in number to 20 of the total number of votes cast in the last state general election. If you have any further questions on these procedures, please feel free to give me a call. Very truly yours, Charles L. LeFevere CLL:rsr Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CHARTER WHEREAS, the responsibilities and activities of the Brooklyn Center fire department are such that the need exists for greater attention to day -to -day matters related to fire prevention and suppression in the City of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Charter Commission deems it in the best interest of the community to appoint a full -time paid fire chief who will be able to respond to the daily administrative activities of the fire department. 'NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Charter Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center that the City Council be directed to consider an ordinance amending section 6.02., subdivision 3(b) of the Brooklyn Center City Charter as follows (underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted). "The Fire Chief [shall be a volunteer who] shall be appointed from the members of the [Volunteer] Fire Department. Procedures for the appointment, suspension and removal of the Fire Chief shall be set forth in paragraph (a) of this subdivision." i Date ' Chairmen The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ' and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of , at P.M. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider An Ordinance Amending the Brooklyn Center City Charter. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 561 -5440 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CHARTER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 6.02, Subdivision 3. (b) of the Brooklyn Center City Charter' °is hereby amended as follows: Section 6.02. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE CITY MANAGER Subdivision 3. (b) The Fire Chief [shall be a volunteer who] shall be appointed from the members of the [Volunteer] Fire Department. Procedures for the appointment, suspension and removal of the Fire Chief shall be set forth in paragraph a of this g P ( ) subdivision. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after publication and ninety (90) days following its adoption. Adopted this day of Mayor ATTEST: Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.) MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter.. City Manager FROM: Director of Finance DATE: November 25, 1987 SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION BYLAWS The current bylaws of the Brooklyn Center Fire Department Relief Association require that, in addition to trustees elected from the Association, the Mayor Clerk and Fire Chief shall also be trustees. This provision was in accordance with state statutes at the time the bylaws were last amended. At that time, you were also the City Clerk. I have acted in an unofficial advisory role to the Board of Trustees. Since the last amendments to the bylaws, two events have happened. They are: (1) Darlene Weeks, Administrative Office Manager, became City Clerk, and (2) State statutes were amended to allow either the clerk, clerk- treasurer, or finance director to be a member of the Board of Trustees. Since Darlene has not been involved in Association matters, and I have, you might want to consider placing me on the Board of Trustees. If so, the action required would be for the City Council to direct the Fire Relief Association to amend its bylaws to replace the Clerk with the Finance Director on the Board of Trustees (Article I. Section 1.). Paul W. Holmlund, Director of Finance PWH /lm DEAN A. NYQUIST a CITY HALL 4F ar CITY 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway eZ.: of Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Bus: 533 -7272 :BROOKLYN Telephone 612/561 -5440 CENTER OFFICE OF THE MAYOR November 30, 1987 Mr. Jerry Splinter Brooklyn Center City Hall 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Dear Jerry, A meeting or two ago we discussed Vento`s Bill usurping control of the Mississippi River Corridor, We did nothing. I think we should look at that Bill again as I don't think it is as harmless as we perceived it to be that evening. I get the raessage that Fridley does not enthusiastically embrace it! Enclosed is a copy of a letter from their Mayor to Congressman Vento. Sincerely, Dean A. Nyquist DAN /lb cc: Council Members (NOT PRINTED AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE) ,n_.. C11YOF FRIM Y CIVIC CENTER 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 PHONE (612) 571 -3450 November 10, 1987 Congressman Bruce Vento 230 Rayburn Office Building Washington, D.C. 20501 Dear Congressman Vento: Re: Tri -River Nationalization HR 2530 I The actual language of your bill, HR 2530, was brought to my attention recently. It's from the minutes of the House of May 27, 1987, which is some months back. I wish the detail had been brought to my attention earlier, preferably before you introduced it, because it's a far cry from the understanding I received from you in our phone eonversat- on a year or so ago i B c by t. If you recall our conversation, you called to tell me of your intentions. I told you I didn't see any particular need for it, but the understanding I received, led me to not object. That "understanding" didn't suggest, in any way, the Federal takeover I see in your Bill. To refresh your memory on what I told you on the phone, I said I didn't see any particular need for Federal concern about the protection of the upper Mississippi... that for many years the upper Mississippi had been generally protected by the Critical Rivers Act, and that local governments also had been deeply concerned with protecting the river. I don't know of any local government or count that willfully I Y Y or negligently permits clear abuse. To the extent some abuse still exists: Combined sewers, for example, it's not a problem of local government negligence or lack of desire, it's only a problem of finding the money for correction. I have been deeply involved in protecting the Mississippi River ever since I took office here in Fridley in 1961. In 1964, Governor Rolvaag appointed me to a state ad hoc committee to focus on that concern, and later I served on two other Mississppi River management study groups. So I am hardly a "Johnny- come - lately." -G- And I must say from that perspective and being concerned with river management for so many years, the one thing I can say with certainty is there is no need to put another level of government into the jurisdiction. I say this based on my own knowledge, and from the study of the recent "Final Report of the Metropolitan River Coridors Study Committee." Consider our management here in Fridley. I think it's typical of the cities I know in this area. We did a study in 1954 involving riverfront development and have developed..in accordance with that plan. Today, there is NO undeveloped river frontage anywhere in Fridley. We are proud of our stewardship of the resource and certainly can't conceive of a need to turn it over to the Secretary of Interior. Of the 32,000 feet (6 miles) of riverfront in our stewardship, 75 percent is in public ownership. How much do you want? Total river frontage - 32,000 feet (about 6 miles) Private use (residential) - 8,000 feet (approximately 25 percent) Public uses - 24,000 feet including: 2 City parks 3 County parks 1 Girl Scout camp 1 Riverfront drive 1 Bikeway System 1 Water production facility, St. Paul 1 Water production facility, Minneapolis 1 Freeway river crossing site I might say that of all this development, the only serious adverse environmental effects result from the Federal site, the freeway crossing (I -694), and its associated freeway drainage discharges. I am generally familiar with the stewardship practiced by all the other municipalities upstream from Minneapolis and I don't know of any deliberate abuse whatsoever. To the extent, some treatment plants may not be as good as they should be. The problem is lack of funds, not lack of knowledge or good intent. In any event, I cant t believe you have any hard evidence whatsoever to demonstrate a need that justifies the premption of state and local discretion provided for in your bill. That's not to say we wouldn't welcome Federal assistance on some of our projects. In fact, one County park was purchased with Federal funds. The City would certainly welcome Federal funds on our two riverfront parks. Indeed, one has been the beneficiary of Federal funds to help buy out dilapidated housing in a flood plain to expand that park. We would welcome the Army Corps of Engineers economic participation in the improvement of a flood management dike construction project. Up until now, no one has ever demonstrated the necessity for turning jurisdiction over some of our most valuable land to the Secretary of Interior. The way I see it, you propose to turn over basic decision processes that profoundly effect thousands of citizens in this area to a fundamentally unaccountable group of people (the Secretary of Interior and 18 members appointed by the Secretary of Interior). Not one in the entire structure is elected by the people. How far do you propose we go in turning over the regular powers of government to the exclusive use of bureaucrats? _3_ Let me say, I welcome a partnership and involvement with Federal interests, but that's not your proposal. So please make note in your minutes that in Fridley there is one Mayor and five Councilmembers who want to be on record as being strongly opposed to your Bill, HF 2530. Sincerely, William J. Nee, May or WJN /la cc: Senator Dave Durenberger Senator Rudy Bosehwitz Representative Gerry Sikorski Representative Martin Sabo Mayor Don Fraser, Minneapolis vMayor Dean Nyquist, Brooklyn Center Mayor Jim Krautkremer, Brooklyn Park Mayor Bob Lewis, Coon Rapids Mayor Steve Halsey, Anoka Mayor William Haas, Jr., Champlin 1P - GREY CLOUD ISLAND TOWNSHIP COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA September 25, 1987 Ms. Darlene Weeks City Clerk City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 ' Re: HR2530 Vento Bill to Nationalize Mississippi River in Minneapolis /St. Paul Metropolitan Area Dear Ms.'-Weeks: Enclosed is a copy of the Resolution adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Grey Cloud Island Township, Washington County, Minnesota, urging the members of Congress to oppose the Vento Bill, HR2530, which proposes to nationalize the Mississippi River through our area. We are enclosing a copy of the Bill from the Congressional Record in the event that you have not received a copy. Perhaps your governmental unit might consider similar action if you share our concerns. A mailing list of the affected governmental units in our area is enclosed for your convenience, along with a list of the members of Congress. The mailing address for all Senators is United States Senate, Washington, D.C. 20510, and the mailing address of all House members is United States House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. 20215. Please contact us if you have any questions, or desire any assistance or participation. S, rroll J. Boyl C1 k 2/459 -2 1 Loretta Stone, Chair - 612/298 -2518 R. Gordon Nesvig, Supervisor - 612/339 -6500 Lee Edwards, Supervisor - 612/228 -2620 /gmd Enclosures BOX 4. ST. PAUL PARK. MINNESOTA 55071 RESOLUTION OPPOSING HR2530 WHEREAS, Congressman Vento has introduced a bill, HR2530, which affects over 80 miles of property on both sides of the Mississippi River running through the Minneapolis -St. Paul metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, this area is the largest, most highly developed, and the most expensive, metropolitan area in the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, there are twenty cities and five counties regulating development along this portion of the Mississippi River, all with appropriate planning departments and comprehensive plans which interrelate, and the area is further coordinated by the Metropolitan Council for the seven county metropolitan area, various watershed districts, and other agencies; and WHEREAS, HR2530 takes control of planning, development, and other matters, away from the state and local units of government and places it in the hands of a single nonelected j official in Washington D.C.; and WHEREAS, HR2530 tends to nationalize a tremendous amount of private property, with thousands of individual and corporate owners, which would ultimately cost the federal government and taxpayers an immeasurably large amount of money in acquisition costs, as well as costing local governmen an immeasurably large amount of lost revenue as a result of losing such property off the property tax rolls; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Grey Cloud Island Township, Washington County, Y Minnesota, an Urban Township, that all members of Congress and the Senate be, and they hereby are requested and urged to vote against HR2530. Dated this _ �� day of September, 1987. ATTES Lor tta Stone, Chair Carroll J. 'Bo erk ( _ rdo N i , Supervisor Lee Edwards, Supervisor Aluy 27, 1987 CONGRESSIO NAL RECORD -- &tensions of Repmarks E 207 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS VENI'O INTRODUCES LEGISLA- river segment needs to be a cooperative (b) Puxeosrs. —The purposes of this Act TION TO ESTABLISH THE MIS- effort For too long, Federal, State, and local are: SISSIPPI NATIONAL RIVER AND plans and policies have run in different direr- (1) To protect, preserve and enhance the RECREATION AREA tions —the result of this being that the river significant values of the waters and land of envirrinmer-t has suffered. the Mississippi River Corridor within the HON. BRUCE F. VENTQ Following a National Park Service recen- St. Paul - Minneapolis Metropolitan Area. (2) To encourage adequate coordination of OF MINNESOTA naissance study in 1980 which I requested, I all governmental programs affecting the IN THE HOUSE OF EEPRESEINTATIVES offered legislative language that became law, land and water resources of the h:ississippi Wednesday, May 27, 1987 creating the Metropolitan River Corridor Study River Corridor. Committee. The committee's report submitted (3) To provide management framework to Mr. V ENTO. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to to Congress in 1986 has provided further im- assist the State of Minnesota and its units reictroduce today major legislation to desig- petus for the need for a omprehensive effort of local government in the development and nat:) the 80 -mile segment of the Mississippi to address the Mississippi River's future man - implementation of the integrated resource River through the St. Paul- Minneapolis metro- agement and use. management programs for the Mississippi politan area as the "Mlssissippi National River The legislation 1 am introducing also con- River Corridor in order to assure orderly and Recreation Area." tains F:ovistons authorizing Federal participa- public and private development in the area - This legislation was originally introduced tion in a Tri- Ravers Eom d, which will provide a consistent with the findings of this Act. late in the 99th Congress. Since that time I forum for consultation and cooperation in the SFr. 2. ESTABLISIDIEN'r OF NATIONAL RIVEN AND have been pleased with the input I have re- management of the Mississippi, St. Croix, and RECREATION AREA. ceive: from public officials and private indMd- Minnesota Rivers within the Twin Cities metro- (a) ESTABLISHMENT. —There is hereby es- uals concerned with the care and u06zation of politan area. By working with State and local tablished the Mississippi National River and this magnificent river resource. Recreation Area (hereinafter in this Act re- governments, we can significantly improve the ferred to as the "Area ") which shall consist The .}Mississippi as it flows through the Twin management of these rivers. of that portion of the Mississippi River and Cities metropolitan area is truly a national The recent public and private efforts to en- adjacent lands generally within the St. asset, containing a diversity of resources han a the river are evidence of the emer- Paul- INdinneapolis Metropolitan Area, as de- found in r:0 other stretch of this great river. gence of a community consensus that recog- picted on the map entitled bississippi Na- The river itself undergoes a transformation in nizes meat an o; :standing physical feature the tional River and Recreation. Area numbered its passaga through the Twin Cities area— Missssppi River is, its important role in the MI -NRA /80,000 and dated April 1907. The going from a weld and shailow river to channel deve;opment of the region, as well as the im- map shall be on file and avaiiable for public cutting through a deep scenic gcrg , before portant role it contnuas to play today in the inspection in the offices of the Department brea:eng out into a broad flo0dp!ain over- rec t he Offices reation and econcrnic life of the communi- the Ic o fr }n the Metropolitan Metropolita Council Of D.C., and O f looked by rnagn:; went bluffs. the Twin Citi ti es Area in St. tit ,vas be m• cause of the diversity of natural re- I believe le upon can build u on this tar y of t... In _v o f tth e In (h r The Secreetar sources that man was drawn here. Former recosrution to f define the appropriate national terio rior (hereafter referred to as the "Serve- Inman sites abound along tho river, and when role and implement a cooperative plan that Lary") shall publish in the Federal Register. whites entered the area they drew upon the recognizes tie valued historical, cultural, natu- as soon as Practicable after the date of en- river's natural fea'•.tres to estatIt'n the major rat, recreational and economic resources actment of this Act a detailed description mil}iary post of the upper bSidwest, Fort Snail- which the Ali ;siss ppi has to offer. and map of the boundaries e..ablished ing, along the Mississippi's bluffs. The text of the trill foilows: under subsection (a). The river further spurred the economic life H.R. — SEC. a. pas :, >tPPt RIVER COORDINATING Cnst- of the area, an important role it still plays „ MISSION. tod St Anthony Falls in klinneapoLs, the "e it en¢t'ed by the Senate ¢rid fluuse of (a) ESTABLISHMENT. —There is hereby es- ay. At ai ,od significant A waterfall is i n the entire Mis- Repmenteti s of the United States of tablished a Mississippi River Coordinating Y 9 9 Arnerice in Co. grrss essembted Commission whose purpose shall be to assist sissippi, commerce boomed through the de- sttavN L FINDtNrs 4ND PURPOSES. Federal, State, and local authorities in the velopment of sawmills and flour mills and the (A) FINDISGS. —The Congress finds that: development and implementation of an inte- oceration of the first hydroelectric dam on the (1) The Mississippi River Corridor within grated resource management plan for those tv'icsssippi. As with the river's early history, the St. Paul - Minneapolis Metropolitan Area lands and maters as specified in section 2. the Twin Cities today still serve as the termi- represents a nationally significant histor}- The Commission shall consist of the follow - nus for commercial navigation On the upper cal, r•ecreatio %al, scenic, cultural, natural, ing 18 members appointed by ine Secretary Mississippi. and scienti`_ic resource. of the Interior: The unique historic, Cultural, recreational, (2) There is a national interest in the prey- (1) The Director of the National Park economic and other values of the river th es e re , protection and enhancement le Servce, or his designee. t these resources for the benefit of the people (2) The Chief of the Corps of Engineers. through the seven - county metropolitan river of tYteL'n}LedStates. corridor make the Mississippi a special nation - (3) State and local planning efforts along or his designee. at resource. However, the value of this re- the River Corridor pro; ide a unique fo :nda- (3) The Director of the Fish and V ildlife source is, unfortunately, not being ful:y real- ti:on for coordinating Federal, State, and Service, or his designee. ized. The preservation and utilization of the local planning and management processes. (`l) 3 individuals, nominated by the Gover- river is impeded by the lack of a coordinated (4) Existing Federal agency programs lack nor of Minnesota, to represent the interests plan for the river's mane^_,ernent. A large sufficient coordination with State and local of the State of Minnesota. 9e platttting and regulatory authorities to pro- <5) 1 individual, nominated by the Gover- number of Federal, State, and local agencies vide for adequate and comprehensive re- nor of Wisconsin to represent the interests have jurisdiction over various aspects of the source management and economic develop- of the State of 'Wisconsin. river, rrth the result that there are confliCting merit consistent with the protection of the (6) 1 individual, to represent the Metro - and overlapping policies in the land and water Mississippi River Corridor's nationally sig- politan Council of the Twin Cities Area. management of this magnificent resource. nif.irant resources, and the public use and (7) 2 individuals, to represent the cities of The legislation I am introducing today rec- enjoymert of the area. St. Paul and Minneapolis. n og:,izes the national significance and interest (5)The preservation, enhancement, enjoy- (8) 2 individuals, nominated by the Gover- in the river. It builds upon that t0 develop a merit, and utilization of the nationally sig- nor of Minnesota, to represent the interests framework that draws upon the ideas and ex- nif -ant resources of the Mississippi River of the other affected municipalities and Li r e For can be accomplished by a c hensiv • counties. l pertise at the Federal, State, and local levels. ire Ft- decal. State and local comprehensive (9) 1 individual, to represent the Metro - The effective care and management of this planning and management effort. politan Parks and Open Spaces Commission. O This "bullet" symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor. E ''07G CONGRESSIONA1. R ECORD — Ey, ions o, "Rem,rr-ks A'1ay 27, 1987 (10) 1 in;itidual, li by the l;;;v r n,�sota or anv Pe) ::tidal ubdr.ision (:f the subdivision; to minimize adverse impacts on nor of Minnesota, tc n•pr, ,i, n the interests State turd may reirntb :rse the Sta.e or such the values for which the Area is established. of commercial navigation. ,rohtical subdivision for such service•.^,. (m) CortMissioN REVIEW. —T'lie Comu:is- (I1) 4 individua, ;. nommated by the Gov- (1� PLAN, —W;'hm 3 years after enactment sion shall assist the Secretary and the Gov- ernor of Minnesota, ta, to be chosen from the of this Act, the Commis ion shall submit to ernor of Minnesota in reviewing and moui general public. the Se^_relary and the Governor of Minneso- Coring the implementation of the Plan by (o) TERA15. - -(1) Fxc( as provided in to a cornprehensite pian for land and water Federal, State, and local governmental Paragraphs (2) and , 3), rn•nibars (oth. °r use measures for t })e area to to dv% agencies having jurisdiction in the Area. than ex officio members) si,all be appointed and implem=ented by the responsible Federal The Commission may, after providm;, for for ter=ns rf 3 years. agencies, the State of Minnesota. and local (2) Of tho nlembers first appointed— Public comment and subject to the ection (A) Und «•r paragraph (41 of subsection (a): Political SllbdiClSiJnS. Tile plan sit. -tl utilize tary's approval, as set forth in subsection existing site plans but shall coordinate (j) modify said plan, if the Commission de- (i) I s_)all be appointed for a term of 1 those plans to present a unified comprehen- ) [ermines that such modification is necessary 2 site plan for the Area- The plan shall in- to further the purposes of this Act. (ii) 1 shall be appointed for a term of elude but not be limited to each of the fol- years. lowing: (n) TERI•iINATION OF Co.•.iMrssroN. —The (L-) Under paragraphs (7) and (8) of sub- (1) A program for management of exising Commission shall terminate on the date 10 s. ^LO l (a), one shall be appointed for a and future land and :later use. Years after the enactment of this Act. term of I year. (2) A 'i SEC. 4, FEDERAL LANDS AND DEVELOP!QF %T4. im (C) Under paragraph (11) of subsection i Program er•entation and ad rid a d rig for coordinated p ministration of the (a) LaxDS. Notwithstandi :g any otter (a)' i) 1 shall be appointed for a term of 1 plan v :ith prf assignment of responsi- Provision of law, any Federal property locat- ar bilities to tine appropriate governmental ed within the boundaries of the Area as year. 1 shall he appointed for a term of 2 u po nit at the Federal. State, regional and local identified on the map referred to in section P levels. 2, is hereby transferred without consider - yCars. (3) A coordination and consistency tempo- ation to the administrative jurisdiction of (ill) 1 shall be appointed for a term of 4 nent which details the Gays in which local, the Secretary for use by him in implement - ears. State and Federal (3) Any member appointed to fill a cacao- programs and policies ing the purposes of this Act, except 2s fol- cy occurring before the expiration of the may best be coordinated to promote the ,lows: term for which his predecessor was appoint- purpose of this Act. (1) Facilities and lands administered by te to shall be which h i s Pr only for the remain- (4) A program for the consolidation of the Secretary of the Army through the der of such term. n member or serve permits that may be required by Federal, Corps of Engineers for navigational pur- der af State, and local agencies having jurisdiction poses may continue to be used by the Secre - e expiratlon of his term until his succes- over ' - -and and vatcrs within the Area. Cary of the Army subject to the provisions sir has taken office. (j) DEVELOPMENT of PLAN. — (c> CObfP.Zr1SATZpN,— z. of the Corn- of su.,scctiun (b). mission shalt serve without pay. While away (1) In developing the plan the Commission (2) Federal property on which there is lo- rom their homes or reJuiar places of busi- shall consult on a regular basis with appro- sated ar. building or other structure which ness in the performance of services for the priate officials of any local government or is in use (as of the enactment of this Act) Commission. members of the Commission Federal or State agency which has jurisdic- shall not be transferred under this sulsee- shall be allowed travel expenses, including lion over lands and waters within the Area. tion without the concurrence of the admin- per diem in lieu of subsistence, in the same (2) In developing the plan the Commission istering agency. manner as shall consult with interested conservation, persons employed intermittently business, profional and citizen organiza• (b) FEDERAL A Y AC TIVITIES. — ess in Government service are allowed expenses (1) Ix GENERA any department, under section 5703 of title 5 of the United Lions. agency, or instrumentality of the United States Code. (3) In developing the plan the Commission States issues or approves any license or (d) CIu,,r FnsoN, —The Chairp(•rson of the shall conduct public hearings within the permit for any facility or undertaking Commission shall be appointed by the Sec- Area, and at such otlier places as may be ap- within the Area and before any such depart. -:Mary frori among the members of the propriate, for the purposes of providing in- meet, agency or instrumentality commences Commission to s, rve for a term of 3 year, terested persons with the ' opportunity ` to any undertaking or provides any Federal as- (e) QT oRUri. -7 members of the Commis- testify with respect to ma tters to be ad- sistance to the State or any local sion shall constitute a quorum govern- dressed by the plan. mental jurisdiction for any undertaking gove (f) MEETINGS. —The Commission shall (k) AP r_as APPROVAL OF P.—The Commissions within the Area, the department, agency, or r :vet at the call of the Chairman or a ma- plan shall be subm tied to the Secretary instrumentality shall notify the Secretary. jcrity of its rnembcrs. and the Governor of Minnesota, for their (9) DF7ELOPNiENT OF POLICIES AND PRO review. The Secretary shall act on the plan The Secretary shall review the proposed fR- c —As a coordinator and advisory orga- within 90 days. In determining whether to cility or undertaking to assess its comPat- nization, the Commission Shall assist the approve or disapprove Cite plan, the Secre- ibility with the plait approved under section Secretary, the State of Minnesota and local tary Shall consider any comments submitted 3. The Secretary shall make a determina- units of ccvernment, utilizing existing site by the Governor. In re."ewing the plan the tion with respect to the compatibility or in- plans, in developing the following: Secretary shall also consider each of the foi- compatibility of a proposed facility or un- (1) Policies and programs for the preserva- lo=ving: dertaking within 60 days of receiving notice tion and cnhan-enient of the environmental (1) The adequacy of put,lic participation. under this subsection. Unless the Secretary values of the Area. (2) Assurances of plan implementation determines that the proposed facility or un- (2) Policies and programs for enhanced from State and local officials. dertaking is compatible with the plan, or Public outdoor recreation opportunities in (3) The adequacy of regulatory and finan- that such proposed facility or undertaking the Area. cial tools are in place to implement the is essential for the protection of public (3) Policies and programs for the conser• Plan. health or safety or is necessary for national vation and protection of the scenic, histori- (4) Plan provisions for continuing over- security or defense, no license or permit cal, cultural, nutural and scientific values of sight of the plan implementation by the may be issued by a department, agency, or the Area. Secretary and the Governor of Minnesota. instrumentality of the United States for the (4) Policies and programs for the comrner- If the Secretary disapproves the plan, tie facility or undertaking and no such depart - cial utilization of the Area and its related shall, within 60 days after the date of such ment., agency, or instrumentality may com- natural resources, consistent with the pro- disapproval advise the Commission in writ- mence the undertaking or provide Federal tcction of the values for which the Area is ing of the reasons therefor, together with assistance for such undertaking. established as the Mississippi National his recommendations for revision. The Com- (2) WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENTS. —The River and Recreational Area. mission shall within 90 days of receipt of authority of the Secretary of the Army, th) STAFF. —The Secretary shall provide such notice of disapproval revise and resub- through the Corps of Engineers, to under - the Commission with such staff and techni- mit the plan to the Secretary who shall ap- take or contribute to water resources devel- cai assistance as the Secretary, after consul- prove or disapprove a proposed revision opments, including shore erosion control cation with the Cumniission, considers ap within 60 days after the date it is submitted and navigation improvements on lands and propriate to enable the Commission to carry to him. waters within the Area shall be exercised in out its duties. Upon request of the Secre• (1) INTERIM PROGRAM. —Prior to the adop- accordance with plans that are mutually ac- tary. any Federal agency may provide infor- tion of the Commission's plan, the Secre• ceptable to the Secretary and the Secretary oration, personnel, property, and services on tary shall monitor all land and water use ac- of the Army. Such authority shall be exer- a reimbursable basis, to the Commission to tivities within the A.-ea to ensure chat said cased in a manner consistent with the pur- assist in carrying out its duties under this activities are in keeping with the purposes poses of this Act and the purposes of exist - Act. The Secretary may accept the services of this Act, and shall consult and cooperate trig statutes dealing with water and related of personnel detailed from the State of Min- with the State of Minnesota and its political resources development. Multi '1 1 7,1987 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Exmnsions of Rerurrrks E 2077 SEC. 5. ADMINISTRATION. directly required, in the Judgment of the point representatives to a Tri- Rivers Man - (a) AuTltoatTiES —The Secretary shall ad. Secretary, for the protection of the Area in agement Board (hereafter referred to as the minister the Area in accordance with this a ma nner compatible with the plan. "Board"), or any similar organization, which Act. and in accordance with the provisions (e) USE AND OCCUPANCY OF ACQUIRED IM- may be established by the State of Minneso- of law veneraily applicable to uruls of the PROVED PROPERTY. —(I) The Secretary may to to assist in the development and lmpie- national park system. In the case of any permit the owner or owners of any im- mentation of consistent and coordinated conflict bel,xeen the provisions of this Act proved residential property acquired by the land use planning and management policy and such generally applicabie provisions of Secretary under this Act to retain a right of for such portions of such rivers. law, the provisions of this Act shall govern. use and occupancy of the property for non- (b) PERSONNEL. — Upon request of the (b) 61ATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES. —In ad- commercial residential uses not incompati- Board, the Secretary of the Interior and the ministering the Area. the Secretary shall ble with the plan approved under to section Secretary of the Army may detail, on a re- consult and cooperate with the State of 3. Except as provided in this subsection, .Minnesota and its political subdivisions con- such rights shall before a definite term imbursable basis, any personnel to the cernmg the development and management ending not more than 25 years from the Board. of Federal IancL> within the Area. date of acquisition or a term ending at the (c) AUTHORIZATION or APPROPRIATIONS— (c) I.-iND A"uisiTI0N.— Within the bound- death of the owner. The owner shall elect There is hereby authorized to carry out the arks o1 the Area, the Secretary is author- the term to be reser.ed, except that if the Purposes of this section the sum of $100,000 k.cd, in consultation with the State of Min- owner is a corporation, trust, partnership or annually; except that the Federal contribu- nesma and the affected local governmental any entity ether than an individual, the tion to the Board shall not exceed one -third unit. to acquire land and interests therein term shall not exceed 25 years. Unless the of the annual operating costs of the Board. by donation, purchase with donated or ap- property is wholly er partially donated• the propriated funds• exchange or transfer, Secretary shall pay to the o reserving a except as provided in paragraphs (1) and right of use and occupancy under this sec- THE MARYL.AIr'D PHYSICAL (2). tion the fair market value of the property FITNESS COMMISSION (1) Any lands or interests therein owned on the date of its acquisition• less the fair by the State of "Minnesota or any political market value on that date of the right re- subdivision thereof may be acquired only by tained by the owner. HON. ROY DYSON donation. (2) The Secretary may terminate at any (2) Privately owned lands or interests time a right retained pursuant to this sub- or MARYLAND therein may be acquired only with the con- section if it is being exercised in a manner IN THE HOUSE OF REPRES NTATIVES sent of the owner thereof unless the Secre- incompatible with the plan approved pursu- tary makes a determination pursuant to ant to section 3. Wednesday, Alay 27, 1987 subsection (d)(2). (3) As used in thii subsection —the term Mr. DYSON. Mr. Speaker, i rise today t0 (d) REVIEW of LOCAL PLANS.— "improved residential prcperty" means a (1) AuTnomTY. —For the purpose of pro- single- tarnily dwelling, the construction of commemorate the 25th anniversary of the tecting the integrity of the Area the Secre - which began before January 1, 1987, togeth- Maryland Physical Fitness Commission. Since tary shall review all relevant local plans, er with such land on which the dwelling and its establishment in 1961, the commission has laws and Ordinances to determine whether appurtenant buildings are located as is in performed an invaluable service to the Mary- they substantially conform to the plan ap- the same ownership as such dwelling and as land community. proved pursuant to section 3. Additionally the Secretary designates is reasonably nec- The Commission was established in order to the Secretary shall determine the adequacy essary for the owner's continued use and oc- of enforcement of such plans, laws, and or- cupan fulfill the of the President's Council on cy of the dwelling. 9 dinances. including review of building per - SEC. 6. STATF1 AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE AND JURIS• Physical Fitness and Sports. Maryland was -nits and zoning variances granted by local DIMON• the first to form a State commission on physi- governments, and amendments to local laws (a) GRANTS. —Upon approval of the plan cal fitness. The commission originally consist- and ordinances. under section 3, the Secretary is authorized ed of 25 board members and a chairman. The (2) PURPOSE. —The purpose of review to make grants to the State of Minnesota, under paragraph (1) shall be to determine or its political subdivisions, for the acquisi- first chairman was Harry D. Kaufman, who the degree to which actions by local govern- tion within the Area cf lands and waters or Presided over the commission until 1978, means are compatible with the purposes of interests therein in a manner Consistent when my distinguished colleague, the Honora- this Act. Following the approval of the plan with the purposes of this Act. ble BEVERLY B. BYRON, replaced him. The tinder section 3 and after a reasonable (b) COOPERATIVE Acr,EEMENTS. —The Secre- goals of the Maryland Commission remain the period of time has elapsed, upon a finding tary is authorized and directed to enter into same: working cooperatively with the Mary- by the Secretary that such plans, laws and cooperative r any political subdivisie agre <ments with the State of land Department of Education toward the pro - on ordinances are nonexistent, are otherwise Minnesota not in conformance with the plan or are not thereof pursuant to which he may assist in motion of physical fitness for all Maryland citi- being enforced in such manner as will carry the planning for and interpretation of non- zens. Whale the commission's primary focus is out the purposes of this Act (as determined Federal publicly owned lands within the on school children, adults also benefit from Area. commission programs. Finally, the Maryland by the Secretary). and if the Secretary clL term.nes that there is no feasible alterna• (c) TEcsxrCAL ASSISTANCE. —To enable the Commission on Physical Fitness works coop- t; be ve anble to prevent uses which would State of Minnesota and its political subdivi- eratively with various private groups in the y incompatible with the plan, sions to develop and implement programs the Secretar y may exercise the authority compatible with the plan, the Secretary promotion of physical exercise programs. available to him under the provisions of shall provide such technical assistance to Throughout the years, the commission has paragraph (3). created a variety of different programs to help (3) AcqutstTleN. —In those sections of the the State and its political subdivisions as he tY P 9 e Area where local plans, laws and ordinances, deems appropriate. Marylanders of all ages to get in shape. The or amendments thereto or variances there- (d) STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTION —Noth- commission established the "Five Points Pro- irg in this Act shall diminish, enlarge, or gram," which established minimum exercise from are found by the Secretary not to be in modify any rig! -.t of the State of Minnesota Standards for all physical education programs conformance with the plan approved pursu- or any political subdivision thereof, to exer- ant to section 3, or are not being enforced in else civil and criminal jurisdiction within in county schools. The Maryland Commission such manner as will carry out the purposes the Area, or to tax persons, corporations, also converted Old railroad right -of -ways into of this Act (as determined by the Secre- franchises, or private property on the lands new hiking and biking trails. In 1957 the tary), the Secretary shall notify the local and waters included in the Area. "Active People Over 60" program was initial- government authority Concerned. Unless, SEC.,. A .'TIHFttlZATiON* OF APPBnPR1,1T10NS. ed, encouraging elderly citizens to join in a within tie days after the date of such notice, the plan, law, or ordinance• amendment, or There is authorized to be appropriated physical exercise program especially designed variance is modified to conform with the such sums as may be necessary to carry out t0 keep them fit. plan or enforced in such manner as will this Act. Mr. Speaker, in these and innumerable carry out tite purposes of this Act (as deter. TITLE II —TRI- RIVERS MANAGEMENT other ways, the Maryland Physical Fitness mined by the Secretary). the Secretary may SEC. :o1.TRI- RBEHS.NIA%A(.FMENT ROARD• Commission has enriched the physical health acquire land or interests in land without the (a) FEDERAL REPRESENTATIves. —In further- and well being of all Marylanders. For this consent of the owner thereof. Land and in- ante of the integrated management of those reason, Mr. Speaker, on this occasion of its terests in land acquired pursuant to this portions of the Mississippi, St. Croix, and subsection shall be restricted to the geo- Minnesota Rivers within the St. Paul -Mtn- 25th anniversary, on behalf of all Marylanders, graphical area of the local auverninental neapolis Metropolitan Area. the Secretary I would like to express our heartfelt gratitude unit failing to conform with the plan and of the Interior and the Secretary of the for the outstanding work the commission has shall be limited to those lands clearly and Army are authorized and directed to ap. done throughout the years. ANOKA: (421 -6630) Mr. Jerry Dulgar mayor Stephen Halsey City Manager City of Anoka City of Anoka 1 ,318 Norwood Lane 2015 First Avenue North Anoka, Minnesota 55303 Anoka, Minnesota 55303 BROOKLYN CENTER: (561 -5440) Ms. Darlene Weeks Mayor Dean Nyquist City Clerk City of Brooklyn Center City of Brooklyn Center 5637 Brooklyn Blvd. 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 BROOKLYN PARK: (424 -8000) Ms. Myrna Maikkula Mayor James Krautkremer City Clerk City of Brooklyn Park City of Brooklyn Park 5800 85th Avenue North 5800 85th Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 CHAMPLIN: (421 -8064) I Ms. Joanne Brown Mayor William Haas, Jr. City Clerk City of Champlin City of Champlin 12001 Jefferson Highway 12001 Jefferson Highway Champlin, MN 55316 Champlin, MN 55316 COON RAPIDS: (780 -6457) Ms. Betty Backes Mayor Robert B. Lewis City Clerk City of Coon Rapids City of Coon Rapids 1313 Coon Rapids Blvd. 1313 Coon Rapids Blvd. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 COTTAGE GROVE: (458 -2800) Mr. Carl Meissner Mayor Roger Peterson City Clerk City of Cottage Grove City of Cottage Grove 7516 South 80th Street 7516 South 80th Street Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Cottage Grove, MN 55016 DENMARK TOWNSHIP (Urban): (437 -9815) Mr. Jack Schneider Chairman, Board of Supervisors Denmark Township 1 P.O. Box 156 Hastings, MN 55033 FRIDLEY: (571 - 3450) Ms. Shirley Haapala Mayor William Nee City Clerk City of Fridley City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432 GREY CLOUD TOWNSHIP (Urban): (459 -3235) Ms. Loretta Stone Chairperson, Board of Supervisors 5887 Pioneer Road St. Paul Park, MN 55071 HASTINGS: (437 -4127) Ms. Barbara Thompson Mayor Lou Ann Stoeffel City Clerk City of Hastings City of Hastings 100 Sibley Street 100 Sibley Street Hastings, MN 55033 Hastings, MN 55033 INVER GROVE HEIGHTS: (457 -2111) Mr. R. W. Schaefer Mayor William Saed City Clerk City of Inver Grove Heights City of Inver Grove Heights 8150 Barbara Avenue East 8150 Barbara Avenue East Inver Grove Heights, MN 55075 Inver Grove Heights, MN 55075 LILYDALE: (454 -2674) Mr. Harold Rehfeld Mayor Harvey Bream City Clerk City of Lilydale City of Lilydale 1775 Lexington Court 855 Sibly Memorial Highway Lilydale, MN 55118 Lilydale, MN 55118 MENDOTA: (454 -1262) Mayor Robert Bruestle City of Mendota P.O. Box 696 Mendota, MN 55150 MENDOTA HEIGHTS: (452 -1850) Ms. Kathleen Swanson Mayor Charles Mertensotto City Clerk 750 South Plaza Drive 750 South Plaza Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2 MINNEAPOLIS: (348 -2215) Ms. Merry Keefe Mayor Donald Fraser City Clerk City of Minneapolis City of Minneapolis Room 304 City Hall Room 127 City Hall Minneapolis, MN 55415 Minneapolis, MN 55415 NEWPORT: (459 -5677) Ms. Arlene Mann Mayor John Walker Acting City Clerk City of Newport City of Newport 596 7th Avenue 596 7th Avenue Newport, MN 55055 Newport, MN 55055 NININGER TOWNSHIP (Urban): (437 -5690) Mt. Robert Rotty Chairman, Board of Supervisors Nininger Township 7918 150th Street East Hastings, MN 55033 ROSEMOUNT: (423 -4411) Mr. Stephen Jilk Mayor Leland Knutson City Administrator City of Rosemount City of Rosemount P.O. Box 510 P.O. Box 510 Rosemount, MN 55068 Rosemount, MN 55068 ST. PAUL: (298 -4012) Mr. Albert Olson Mayor George Latimer City Clerk City of Saint Paul City of Saint Paul 15 West Kellogg Blvd. 15 West Kellogg Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55102 St. Paul, MN 55102 ST. PAUL PARK: (459 -9785) Mr. Barry Sittlow Mayor John Hunziker City Administrator /Clerk City of St. Paul Park City of St. Paul Park 900 3rd Street 620 7th Avenue St. Paul Park, MN 55071 St. Paul Park, MN 55071 SOUTH ST. PAUL: (450 -8702) Mr. Jim Cosgrove Mayor Bruce Baumann City Coordinator City of South St. Paul City of South St. Paul 125 3rd Avenue North 125 3rd Avenue North South St. Paul, MN 55075 South St. Paul, MN 55075 3 COUNTIES ANOKA: (421 -4760) Mr. John "Jay" McLinden Mr. Dan Erhart County Administrator Chair, Board of County Anoka County Courthouse Commissioners 325 East Main Street Anoka County Courthouse Anoka, MN 55303 325 East Main Street Anoka, MN 55303 DAKOTA: (438 -4418) Mr. Thomas Novak Mr. Stephen Loeding County Administrator Chair, Board of County Dakota County Government Ctr. Commissioners 1560 Hwy. 55 West Dakota County Government Ctr. Hastings, MN 55033 1560 Hwy. 55 West Hastings, MN 55033 HENNEPIN: (348 -3081) Mr. Dale A. Ackmann Mr. Mark Andrew County Administrator Chair, Board of County A -2303 Hennepin County Commissioners Government Center A -2400 Hennepin County Minneapolis, MN 55487 Government Center Minneapolis, MN 55487 RAMSEY: (298 -4145) Mr. Terry Schutten Ms. Diane Ahrens Executive Director Chair, Board of County 316 Courthouse Commissioners St. Paul, MN 55102 316 Courthouse St. Paul, MN 55102 WASHINGTON: (759 -5401) Mr. Chuck Swanson Ms. Sally Evert County Administrator Chair, Board of County 14900 61st Street North Commissioners Stillwater, MN 55082 14900 61st Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 4 Senate - 24 Senate Membership in the 100th Congress Democrats - 55 Republicans - 45 Freshman senators - 13 Seats switched D to R - 1 Seats switched R to D - 9 Senators elected in 1986 are italicized # Freshman senators ✓ Seat switched parties ALABAMA I I PENNSYLVANIA Howell Heflin (D) John Heinz (R) ✓ Richard C. Shelby (D)tt Arlen Specter (R) ALASKA INDIANA MONTANA RHODE ISLAND Frank H. Murkowskl (R) Richard G. Lugar (R) Maas Baucus (D) John H. Chafee (R) Ted Stevens (R) Dan Ouayle (R) John Melcher (0) Claiborne Pell (D) ARIZONA IOWA NEBRASKA SOUTH CAROLINA Dennis DeConcini (D) Charles E. Grassley (R) 4. Jams Exon (0) Ernest F. Hoffings (0) John McCain (R)t Tom Harkin (D) Edward Zorinsky (D) Strom Thurmond (R) ARKANSAS KANSAS NEVADA SOUTH DAKOTA Dale Bumpers (0) Robert Dole (R) ✓ Hary Reid (D)tt ✓ Thomas A. Daschle (D)a David Pryor (D) Nancy Landon Kassebaum (R) Chic Hecht (R) Larry Pressler (R) CALIFORNIA KENTUCKY NEW HAMPSHIRE TENNESSEE Alan Cranston (D) Wendell H. Ford (D) Gordon J. Humphrey (R) Albert Gore Jr. (0) Pete Wilson (R) Mitch McConnell (R) VArren B. Rudman (R) Jim Sasser (0) COLORADO LOUISIANA NEW JERSEY TEXAS William L. Armstrong (R) John B. Breaux (D)xt BE Bradley (D) Lloyd Bentsen (D) Timothy E. Wirth (D)a J. Bennett Johnston (D) frank R. Lautenberg (0) Phil Gramm (R) CONNECTICUT MAINE NEW MEXICO UTAH Christopher J. Dodd (0) George J. Mitchell (D) Jeff Bingaman (D) Jake Gam (R) Lowell P. Weicker Jr. (R) William S. Cohen (R) Pete V. Domenicl (R) Orrin G. Hatch (R) DELAWARE MARYLAND NEW YORK VERMONT Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D) ✓ Barbara A. Mikulskl (D)4t AXmnse M. D'Amato (R) Patrick J. Leahy (D) William V. Roth Jr. (R) Paul S. Sarbanes (0) Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D) Robert T. Stafford (R) FLORIDA MASSACHUSETTS NORTH CAROLINA VIRGINIA Lawton Chiles (D) Edward M. Kennedy (D) Jesse Helms (R) Paul S. Trible Jr. (R) , 'Bob Graham (0)a John Kerry (0) ✓Terry Sanford (DP John W. Warner (R) GEORGIA MICHIGAN NORTH DAKOTA WASHINGTON ✓ Wyche Fowler Jr. (D)tt Carl Levin (D) OuaaGn N. Burdick (0) ✓ Brock Adams (D)tt Sam Nunn (0) Donald W. Riegle Jr. (D) ✓ K&# Conrad (D)n Daniel J. Evans (R) HAWAII MINNESOTA OHIO WEST VIRGINIA Daniel K. Inouye (D) Rudy Boschwitz (R) John Glenn (D) Robert C. Byrd (D) Spark M. Matsunaga (0) Dave Durenberger (R) Howard M. Metzenbaum (0) John D. Rockefeller IV (D) IDAHO MISSISSIPPI OKLAHOMA WISCONSIN James A. McClure (R) John C. Stennis (D) David L. Boren (0) Bob Kasten (R) Steven D. Symms (R) Thad Cochran (R) Don Nickles (R) William Proxmire (D) ILLINOIS MISSOURI OREGON WYOMING Alan J. Dixon (D) ✓ Christopher S. "Kit" Bond (R)# Mark O. Hatfield (R) Alan K. Simpson (R) Paul Simon (0) John C. Danforth (R) Bob Packwood (R) Malcolm Wallop (R) --PAGE 2839 Nov. B, 1986 �....... r.�a... - .,..........— ....a..d .w, House - 16 o • onse Membership in 100th Congress .. . ALABAMA 4. Jim Bunning (R):: 1. Sonny Callahan (R) House Lineup 5. Harold Rogers (R) 2. William L. Dickinson (R) 6. Larry J. Hopkins (R) 3. Biel Nichols (D) Dem 258 Republicans 177 7. Carl C. Perkins (0) 4. Tom Be G. 5. Ronnie G. Flip (0) Freshman Democrats - 27 Freshman Republicans - 23 LOUISIANA 6. Ben Erdreich (D) Freshman Representative t Former Representative 1. Bob Livingston (R) D) is 7. Claude Harps (D) # Based on apparent winners as of Nov. 6. Sew in doubt marked by an 2. Lindy (Mrs. Hale) Boggs (D) 3. W. J. "Billy" Tauzin (0) ALASKA 4. Buddy Roomer (D) AL Don Young (R) 44. Jim Bates (D) IDAHO 5. Jerry Huckaby (D) ARIZONA 45. Duncan L. Hunter (R) 1. Larry E. Craig (R) 6. Richard Baker (R) tt 1. John J. Rhodes III (R) tt 2. Richard H. Stallings (D) 7. Jimmy Hayes (0) tt 2. Morris K. Udall (D) COLORADO S. Clyde Holloway (R) a 3. Bob Stump (R) 1. Patricia Schroeder (0) ILLINOIS 4. Jon Kyl (R) tt 2. David Skaggs (D) tt 1. Charles A. Hayes (D) MAINE 5. Jim Kolbe (R) 3. Ben Nighthorse Campbell (0) tt 2. 'Gus Savage (D) 1. Joseph E. Brennan (0) tt 4. Hank Brown (R) 3. Marty Russo (D) 2. Olympia J. Snowe (R) ARKANSAS 5. Joel Herley (R) 4. Jack Davis (R) tt + tt MARYLAND 1. Bill Alexander (D) 5. William O. Lipinski (D) 6. Daniel L. Schaefer (R) 1. Roy Dyson (0) 2. Tommy F. Robinson (D) 6. Henry J. Hyde (R) 2. Helen Delich Bentley (R) 3. John Paul Hammerschmidt (R) CONNECTICUT 7. Cardiss Collins (D) 3. Benjamin L. Cardin (0) tt 4. Beryl Anthony Jr. (0) 1. Barbara B. Kennelly (D) 8. Dan Rostenkowski (D) 4. Thomas McMillen (D) tt CALIFORNIA 2. Sam Ge)denson (0) 9. Sidney R. Yates (D) 5. Steny H. Hoyer (D) 1. Douglas H. Bosco (D) 3. Bruce A. Morrison (D) 10. John Edward Porter (R) 6. Beverly B. Byron (0) 2. Wall er tt 4. Stewart B. McKinney (R) 11. Frank Annunzio (D) Wally Her R) g ( 5. John G. Rowland (R) 12. Philip M. Crane (R) 7. Constance nce A. (D) tt 3. Robert T. Matsui (D) B. Constance A. Morelia (R) tt 4. Vic Fazio (D) 6. Nancy L. Johnson (R) 13. Harris W. Fawell (R) 5. Sala Burton (D) 14. J. Dennis Hastert (R) tt MASSACHUSETTS 6. Barbara Boxer (0) DELAWARE 15. Edward R. Madigan (R) 1. Silvio O. Conte (R) 7. George Miller (D) AL Thomas R. Carper (D) 16. Lynn Martin (R) 2. Edward P. Boland (D) 8. Ronald V. Dellums (0) 17. Lane Evans (D) 3. Joseph 0. Early (0) FLORIDA 18. Robert H. Michel (R) 4. Barney Frank (0) 9. Fortney H. "Pete" Stark (0) 1. Earl Hutto (0) 10. Don Edwards (D) 2. Ch Grant (D) tt 19. Terry L. Bruce (D) 5. Chester G. Atkins (D) 11. Tom Lantos (0) 3. Ch 20, Richard J. Durbin (D) 6. Nicholas Mavroules (D) Charles E. Bennett (D) Melvin Price D Edward J. Marko 0 12. Ernest L. Konnyu (R) tt 21 - � ( 1 7. Ed a y ( ) 4. Bill Chappell Jr. (0) 22. Kenneth J. Gray (D) 8. Joseph P. Kennedy II (0) tt 13. Norman Y. Mineta (D) 5. Bill McCollum (R) 9. Joe Moakley (D) 14. Norman D. Shumway (R) 6. Buddy MacKay (0) INDIANA 15. Tony Coelho (D) 7. Sam Gibbons (D) 1. Peter J. Visciosky (D) 11. Brian J. Donnelly 10. Gerry E. Studds (0) D) 16. Leon E. Panetta (0) 8, G.W. Bill Young (R) 2. Philip R. Sharp (0) 17. Charles Pashayan Jr. (R) 9. Michael Bilirakis (R) 3. John Hiler (R) ' MICHIGAN 16. Richard H. Lehman (0) 10. Andy Ireland (R) 4. Dan Coats (R) I. John Conyers Jr. (0) 19. Robert J. Lagomarsino (R) 11. Bill Nelson (0) S. Jim Jontz (0) v 2. Cart D. Pursell (R) 20. William M. Thomas (R) 12, Tom Lewis (R) 6. Dan Burton (R) 3. Howard Woipe (D) 21. Elton Gallegly (R) tt 13. Connie Mack (R) 7. John T. Myers (R) 4. Fred Upton (R) is 22. Carlos J. Moorhead (R) 14. Daniel A. Mica (D) S. Frank McCloskey (0) S. Paul B. Henry (R) 23. Anthony C. Beilenson (D) 15. E. Clay Shaw Jr. (R) 9. Lee H. Hamilton (D) 6. Bob Carr (D) 24. Henry A. Waxman (0) 16. Larry Smith (0) 10. Andrew Jacobs Jr. (D) 7. Dale E. Kildee (D) 25. Edward R. Roybal (D) 17. William Lehman (0) 8. Bob Traxler (D) 26. Howard L. Berman (D) 18. Claude Pepper (D) IOWA 9. Guy Vander Jagt (R) 27. Mel Levine (0) A. 1 Jan Leach (R} 19. Dante B. Fascell (0) 10. BIII Schuette (R) 2B. Julian C. Dixon (D) 2. Tom Tauke (R) 29. Augustus F. Hawkins (0) GEORGIA 3. 'Dave R. Nagle (D) rs 1 t. Robert 12. David E. . Davis Bonier (OD) 4. Real Smith 30. Matthew G. Martinez (D) 1. Robert Lindsay Thomas (0) (D) 13. George W. Crockett Jr. (0) 31. Mervyn M. Dymally (0) 2. Charles Hatcher (0) 5. Jan Lightfoot (R) 14. Dennis M. Hertel (0) 32. Glenn M. Anderson (0) 3. Richard Ray (0) 6. Fred Grandy (R) tt 15. William O. Ford (D) 33. David Dreier (R) 4. Pat Swindall (R) KANSAS 16. John 0. Dingell (D) 34. Esteban Edward Torres (D) 5. John Lewis (0) tt 1. Pat Roberts (R) 17. Sander M. Levin (D) 35. Jerry Lewis (R) 6. Newt Gingrich (R) 2. Jim Slattery (D) 18. William S. Broomfield (R) 36. George E. Brown Jr. (0) 7. George "Buddy" Darden (0) 3, Jan Meyers (R) 37. AI McCandless (R) S. J. Roy Rowland (0) 4. Dan Glickman (D) MINNESOTA 38. Bob Doman (R) 9. Ed Jenkins (0) 5. 'Bob Whittaker (R) 1. Timothy J. Penny (0) 39. William E. Dannemeyer (R) 10. Doug Barnard Jr. (0) 2. Vin Weber (R) 40. Robert E. Badham (R) KEI MCKY 3. Bill Frenzel (R) 41. Bill Lowery (R) HAWAII 1. Carroll Hubbard Jr. (D) 4. Bruce F. Vento (0) 42. Dan Lungren (R) 1. Patricia Saikl (R) tt 2. William H. Natcher (D) 5. Martin Olav Sabo (D) 43. Ron Packard (R) 2. Daniel K. Akaka (D) 3. Romano L. Mazzoll (D) 6. Gerry Sikorskl (D) PAGE 2856 -Nov. 8, 1986 x"'"'"19"`""""'* -.* " House - 17 . s . Reflects Strong Showing by Incumbents 7. Arlan Stangeland (R)' 10. Charles E. Schumer (0) 4. Dave McCurdy (0) 8. Jack Fields (R) S. James L. Oberstar (D) 11. Edolphus Towns (0) 5. Mickey Edwards (R) 9. Jack Brooks (D) 12. Major R. Owens (0) 6. Glenn English (D) 10. J. J. Pickle (D) MISSISSIPPI 13. Stephen J. Solarz (0) 1. Marvin Leath Q ( ) 1. Jamie L. Whitten O OREGON ( ) 1d. Guy V. Molinari (R) 1 Les AuCoin (D) 1 12. Jim Wright (D) . 2. Mike Espy (0) n 15. Bill Green (R) 13. Beau Boulter (R) 3. G. V. "Sonny" Montgomery (D) 16, Charles S. Rangel (D) 2. Robert F. Smith (R) 14. Mac Sweeney (R) 4, Wayne Dowd D 3. Ron Wyden (D) 15. E. "Kika" de la Garza ( 0 Y Y ( ) 17. Ted Weiss 4. Peter A. DeFazlo (D) tt ) 5. Trent Lott (R) 18. Robert Garcia (D) 16. Ronald O. Coleman (D) R Smith S () Denny m MISSOURI 19. Marto Biaggi (0) 5. 17. Charles W. Stenholm (0) 20. Joseph J. DioGuardi (R) PENNSYLVANIA 18. Mickey Leland (D) 1. William L. Clay (D) 21. Hamilton Fish Jr. (R) 1. Thomas M. Foglietta (D) 19. Larry Combest (R) 2. Jack Buechner (R) tt 22. Benjamin A. Gilman R) . Henry S. Gonzalez j ( 2. William H. Gray ill (D) 20 HO ( ) 3. Richard A. Gephardt (D) 23. Samuel S. Stratton (D) 3. Robert A. Borski (D) 21. Lamar Smith (R) tt 4. Ike Skelton (D) 24. Gerald B. H. Solomon (R) 4. Joe Koller (0) 22. Thomas D. Delay (R) 5. Alan Wheat (D) ' 6. E. Thomas Coleman (R) 25. Sherwood L. Boehlert (R) 5. Richard T. Schulze (R) 23. Albert G. Bustamante (D) 26. David O'S. Martin (R) 6. Gus Yatron D) 24. Martin Frost (D) 7. Gene Taylor (R) 27, George C. Wortley (R) 7. Curt Weldon (R) tt 25. Michael A. Andrews (0) 8. Bill Emerson (R) + 28. Matthew F. McHugh (D) 8. Peter H. Kostmayer (D) 26. Dick Armey (R) 9. Harold L. Volkmer (D) ` P9, Frank Horton (R) Bud Shuster (R) R) 27. Solomon P. Ortiz (D) MONTANA 30. Louise M. Slaughter (D) tt 10. Joseph M. McDade (R) UTAH 1. Pat Williams (0) 31. Jack F. Kemp (R) 11. Paul E. Kanjorski (0) 1. James V. Hansen (R) 32. John J. LaFalce (0) 2 Wayne Owens (D)t tt "c. Ron Marlenee (R) 12. John P. Murtha (0) 33. Henry J. Nowak (D) 13, Lawrence Coughlin (R) 3. Howard C. Nielson (R) NEBRASKA 34, Amory Houghton Jr. (R) tt 14. William J. Coyne (D) 1. Doug Bereuter (R) NORTH CAROLINA 15. Don Ritter (R) VERMONT 2. Hal Daub (R) 1. Walter B. Jones (D) 16. Robert S. Walker (R) AL James M. Jeffords (R) 3. Virginia Smith (R) 2, Tim Valentine (0) 17. George W. Gekas (R) VIRGINIA 3. Martin Lancaster (D) tt 18. Doug Walgren (D) NEVADA . David E. Price 0) tt 19. Bill Goodiing (R) 1. Herbert H. Bateman (R) 4 1. James H. Bilbray (D) tt ( 2. Owen B. Pickett (D) tt 20. Joseph M. Gaydos (0) 5. Stephen L. Neal (0) 2. Barbara F. Vucanovich (R) 3. Thomas J. Bliley Jr. (R) 6. Howard Coble (R) ' 21. Tom Ridge (R) NEW HAMPSHIRE 7. Charlie hose (D) 22. Austin J. Murphy (D) 4. Norman e l ( (D) 5. Jan Daniel (J) 1. Robert C. Smith (R) 8. W. G. "Sill' Hefner (D) 23. William F. Clinger Jr. (R) 6. James R. Ofin (D) 2. Judd Gregg (R) 9. J. Alex McMillan (R) RHODE ISLAND 7. D. French Slaughter Jr. (R) 10. Cass Ballenger (R) tt 1. Fernand J. St Germain (0) a. Stan Parris (R) NEW JERSEY 11. James McClure Clarke (D)t tt 2. Claudine Schneider (R) 9. Frederick C. Boucher (D) 1. James J. Florio (0) 2. William J. Hughes (D) NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH CAROLINA 10. Frank R. Wolf (R) 3. James J. Howard (D) AL Byron L. Dorgan (D) 1. Arthur Ravenel Jr. (R) a WASHINGTON 4. Christopher H. Smith (R) OHIO 2. Floyd Spence (R) 1. John R. Miller (R) 5. Marge Roukema (R) 1. Thomas A. Luken (D) 3. Butler Derrick (D) 2. At Swift (D) 6. Bernard J. Dwyer (0) 2. Bill Gradison (R) 4. Elizabeth J. Patterson (D) tt 3. Don Bonker (D) 7. Matthew J. Rinaldo (R) 3. Tony P. Hall (D) 5. John M. Sprott Jr. (D) 4. Sid Morrison (R) 8. Robert A. Roe (D) 4. Michael G_ Oxley (R) 6. Robin Tallon (D) 5, Thomas S. Foley (D) 9. Robert G. 7orricelli (D) 5. Delbert L. Latta (R) 6. Norman D. Dicks (D) SOUTH DAKOTA 7 Mike Lowry (0) 10. Peter W. Rodino Jr. (D) 6. Bob McEwen (R) AL Tim Johnson (D) a 11. Dean A. Gallo (R) 7. Michael DeWine (R) 8. Rod Chandler (R) 12. Jim Courier (R) 8. Donald E. - Buz - Lukens (R)t a TENNESSEE WEST VIRGINIA 13. H. James Saxton (R) 9. Marcy Kaptur (D) 1. James H. Quillen (R) 1, Alan B. Mollohan (D) 14. Frank J. Guarini (D) 10. Clarence E. Miller (R) 2. John J. Duncan (R) 2, Harley O. Staggers Jr. (D) NEW MEXICO 11. Dennis E. Eckart (D) 3. Marilyn Lloyd (D) 3. Bob Wise (0) 12. John R. Kasich (R) 4. Jim Cooper (0) 4. Nick J. Rahali 11 (D) 1. Manuel Lujan Jr. (R) 13. Don J. Pease (D) 5. Bill Boner (D) 2. Joe Skeen (R) 14. Tom Sawyer (D) it 6. Bart Gordon (D) WISCONSIN 3. Bill Richardson (0) 15. Chalmers P. Wylie (R) 7. Don Sundquist (R) 1. Les Aspin (0) NEW YORK 16. Ralph Regula (R) 8. Ed Jones (D) 2, Robert W. Kastenmeier (D) 1. George J. Hochbrueckner (D) u 17• James A. Traficant Jr. (D) 9. Harold E. Ford (0) 3. Steve Gunderson (R) 2. Thomas J. Downey (D) 18. Douglas Applegate (D) TEXAS 4, Gerald D. Kleczka (D) Lent (R) (D) i. Jim Chapman 2. Charles Wilson ( 19. Edward F. Feighan (D) ( D) S. Jim Moody (D) a. Norman F. Lent ( 3. Robert J. 20. Mary Rose Oakar (D) 6, Thomas E. Petri (R) 5. Raymond J. McGrath (R) 21. Louis Stakes (D) 7. David R. Obey (D) 3. Steve Bartlett (R) 8. Toby Roth (R) 6. Floyd H. Flake (D) a OKLAHOMA 4. Ralph M. Hall (D) 7. Gary L. Ackerman (D) 1. James M. Inhofe (R) a 5. John Bryant (D) 9 • F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R) 8 James H. Scheuer (D) 2. Mike Synar (0) 6. Joe L. Barton (R) WYOMING S. Thomas J. Manion (D) 3. Wes Watkins (D) 7. Bill Archer (R) AL Dick Cheney (R) `'°'"° '~° `'""""' °" Nov. 8, 1986 -PAGE 2857 . M & C NO. 87 -21 December 11, 1987 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Northern Mayors' Association Steering Committee Report To the Honorable Mayor and Council: Attached please find a copy of the Steering Committee Report which will be reviewed by the Northern Mayors' Association in the near future. This report expresses concerns of a number of managers in the northwest metropolitan' area relating to activities of coalitions of cities in the eastern part of the metro area and the southwestern part of the metro area. It also expresses the interest that there is no effective promotional effort for the northern tier of communities. The Mayors' Association was formed to examine and promote methods and ways of enhancing the economic development of this portion of • the metropolitan area, and the Steering Committee Report recommends establishment of a permanent staffing of this type of effort. Of course, with any permanent staffing comes the need to finance. The Steering Committee is proposing to the Northern Mayors' group to establish an annual budget of $100,000 for a staff person's clerical support and promotional activities in this area. Also listed on page 2 of this report are a series of primary transportation projects which the report believes are critical to the northern communities. The problem arises that when resources are scarce, and they always are, sectors of the metro area and indeed throughout the state compete for these resources and it is important that the interest of the northern tier of communities be represented. I believe this is especially true in the area of the 610 Crosstown, Highway 100 upgrade, additional river crossing between Anoka and Hennepin County and monitoring the airport planning process. Recent articles in the paper have indicated that the possibility of a second airport or a freight handling airport is again going to be considered by airport planners. I believe it will be exceedingly important that this process be monitored and that the northern site for such a facility be promoted. Brooklyn Center's cost on an annual basis for staffing this effort, depending on the number of communities that may participate, could be between $8,000 and $10,000. The Northern Mayors' Association has asked city managers to review a cost sharing proposal which would split the cost of this effort among M & C No. 87 -21 -2 December 11, 1987 interested communities on the basis of a formula which divides the costs 50% based on population and 50% based on assessed value. The mayors are also interested in examining what kind of funding is available through private sources to assist in this program. However, initially we believe a commitment on the part of the communities is necessary and then it will be easier to raise funds privately. Please understand this is a preliminary proposal and has not had final review by the Executive Committee of the Northern Mayors. I am bringing it to you at this time because I believe you should have time to discuss the matter on a preliminary basis. This proposal will probably be forthcoming on a formal basis sometime early in 1988. Respectfully submitted, Gerald G. Sp l nter City Manager NORTHERN MAYORS' ASSOCIATION STEERING COMMITTEE REPORT On November 3, 1987, Bob Thistle, Chairman of the Opera- ting Committee appointed a committee to form a strategy for coordinating the promotion of transportation improvements and economic development in the north metro area. Committee members are: Hank Sinda City of New Brighton, Chair Rich Johnson, City of Blaine Gerald Splinter, City of Brooklyn Center Jock Robertson, City of Fridley Mark Sievert, City of Dayton Bob Thistle, Coon Rapids. Bill Barnhart, Minneapolis Al Hofstedt, Coon Rapids Statement of Problem The East Metropolitan cities have organized and raised $250,000 for marketing and promotion in the east metro area. A southwest group of cities have also organized and have raised funds to lobby for transportation improvements in the southwest metro area. Findings of the Steering Committee 1. The goals of the Northern Mayors' Association are to promote transportation improvements and economic development in the north metro area. 2. There needs to be a coordinated effort between the Northern Mayors' Association cities and the follow- ing community organizations: A. North Metro Crossing Coalition B. Anoka County Chamber of Commerce (task force) C. Tourism Bureau D. Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce E. New Brighton Chamber of Commerce F. Fridley Chamber of Commerce G. North Metro Traffic Task Force H. Anoka County Economic Development Partnership I. And each member city in the Northern Mayors' Association NORTHERN MAYORS' ASSOCIATION STEERING COMMITTEE REPORT Page Two 3. Primary transportation . a y tr p rtation projects are: A. Light rail transit # B. 35W in Blaine to I -94 in Maple Grove C. Highway 100 (upgrade to freeway status) D. Widen I -694 E. Another river crossing between Anoka County and Hennepin County F. Monitor metro airport facilities G. Northern athletic facility 4. The Northern Mayors' Association should raise $100,000 through member cities -- to be matched by the private sector for additional funding. 5. A staff person And clerical support staff should be hired to coordinate efforts to achieve the organi- zation's goals. 6. The staff, along with appointed committees, will work to achieve the goals of the organization: A. Identify funding sources for transportation projects such as assessments, transportation utilities, grants, tolls, gas tax, TIF, pri- vate donations, other contributions, B. Develop g a strategic plan to achieve those goals, and C. Implement the plan. j3e M & C NO.87 -22 December 11, 1987 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Hennepin County Light Rail Transit - Northwest Corridor To the Honorable Mayor and City Council: The City of Brooklyn Center is within the northwest corridor study area for the new proposed Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority, (light rail transit) . Under legislation authorizing planning money for this system, a planning process was mandated. There are at least three levels of advisory committees. The first one are corridor advisory committees of which four citizens of Brooklyn Center are members of the Northwest Corridor Advisory Committee; Technical Advisory Committee of which I am the appointed member, and an overall advisory committee of which Councilmember Lhotka is a member. • Approximately a week ago I received a call from Todd Paulson, a member representing Brooklyn Center from the Northwest Corridor Advisory Committee asking for Brooklyn Center's comments relating to alternate routes and issues surrounding light rail transit in the northwest corridor. This week I have attended the Northwest Corridor Advisory Committee meeting and attached are materials relating to this group's consideration of issues in this area. Until that particular meeting, there seemed to be a direction by the Northwest Advisory Committee that did not consider sufficient service to the Brookdale Industrial Park area of Brooklyn Center. It now appears that more consideration will be given to that concern. The other issues involved are that North Minneapolis neighborhood representatives are very much against light rail transit corridors that further cut up the north side of Minneapolis. They are opposed to such corridors as Fremont /Penn Avenue that head directly north from the Camden /Broadway area. At the last meeting it appeared that all the members of this Corridor Advisory Committee were expressing frustration at the amount of information, its technical nature, and the lack of other certain types of information, and most of all the short period of time in which they are to make recommendation on a preferred corridor. The legislative deadline for the planning process is that they must report back this coming legislative session and the corridor locations and other technical issues and neighborhood issues are going to be exceedingly difficult to resolve with this type of time constraint. M & C No. 87 -22 -2- December 11, 1987 I will be presenting some additional information Monday evening indicating the various corridors within the northwest area under consideration and some members of the Northwest Corridor Advisory Committee will be available to answer your questions. Respect sjjbwitted, Gerald G. Sp inter City Manager h 1 • • } j I E NORTHWEST CORRIDOR Preliminary Traffic Impact Analysis Burlington Northern o no significant impacts Broadway • need priority at TH# 100 • major impacts between Wirth Parkway and Fremont - traffic lanes reduced to two plus left turns - service diminishes from fair to poor progression reduced turning opportunities - cross - street traffic only at signalized intersections - no driveway entrances on Broadway - no parking on Broadway Broadway via Penn /Plymouth - Penn unacceptable because no room to pass disabled vehicles Brooklyn Boulevard via Penn Penn unacceptable because no room to pass disabled vehicles Brooklyn Boulevard via Fremont Emerson - Fremont unacceptable because no room to pass disabled vehicles PRELIMINARY STATION LOCATION ANALYSIS 1. T.H. 169 and Brooklyn Boulevard - Access from Brooklyn Boulevard - A number of sites available for long -term park- and -ride 2. T.H. 169 and 63rd Avenue - Southbound access from TH 169 - Northbound access more difficult - 4+ acres available 3. Crystal airport - Southbound access from 169 - North bound access more difficult - Minimum park and ride space availible without property acquisition - Could provide stimulus for redeveleopment of airport site 4. TH 169 and Bass Lake Road - Good location for bus feeder and auto access - Excellent re-development potential p p e - Limited park and ride space availible without building /property aquisition 5. TH 169 and Soo Line Rail Bridge 9 - Space availible on both sides of alignment for park- and -ride - Bridge will require replacement - Access may be difficult - LRT will be elevated to clear Soo Line 1 PRELIMINARY STATION LOCATION ANALYSIS Page 2 6. Burlington Northern #1 - Approximately 3 acres - No direct access from TH 169 - Limited access from Broadway 7. TH 100 and TH 169 - Approximately 7 acres available - Difficult access - Access to median alignment from park- and -ride will be more difficult 8. Burlington Northern #2 - Difficult access - Provide service to apartment complex - Limited park - and -ride capacity May adversely impact adjacent residential 9. Shopping Center - Provide service to commercial strip - Limited parking available - Access to station will require signalized crosswalk 10. Hospital - Limited parking without property aquisition - Provide service to hospital - Station access via signalized cross walk or overpass 11. Penn and Broadway - Kiss - and -ride and drop -off only - Feeder bus and drop -off available at cross streets PRELIMINARY STATION LOCATION ANALYSIS Page 3 12. Broadway and Irving Avenue - Same as Station 11 13. Fremont and Emerson Avenue - Same as Stations 11 and 12 14. 7th Street and I -94 - Possible aerial station - Limited access for bus and auto drop -off - Primarily pedestrian oriented 15 and 16. TH 55 - Access via cross walks - Bus feeder and kiss - and -ride via cross streets 17. Burlington Northern #4 - Require aerial station to clear bridges and track crossing - limited access for bus feeder - Significant visual impact if aerial - Pedestrian oriented 18. Burlington Northern #3 - Limited access for feeder bus and kiss and ride - Potential negative impact on park and residential areas I SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR EVALUATION MATRIX: SUBURBAN SECTION EVALUATION CRITERIA WEST SEGMENT ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES ALT. 1 ALT. 2 ALT. 3 ALT. 4 C & NW ROW C & NW ROW V ICTORIA TO MPLS IDERSHIP ATRONAGE 0 NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS WITHIN 1/2 MILE OF ALIGNMENT 0 NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES WITHIN 1/2 MILE OF ALIGNMENT ROW AVAILABILITY AVAILABILITY OF STATION SITES • PARK & RIDE LOT POTENTIAL i TRAVEL TIME TO CBD COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING LAND USE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL IMPACT ON STREET OPERATIONS AIR QUALITY /NOISE IMPACTS OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AVAILABILITY OF COMPETING TRANSIT MODE CAPITAL COST OPERATING COST t 1 r • O� 1 a Y � i_ 7 . 1 G _ r • : ,^ - ]•..,.. ]'�.. s .` ...' .'. `f� t'. 111 V. ^' OR ` ILJI w I sc C ' �„ r ���.� •'�' •4 # -TT - ;'�'� i �� �—• '. _ rl :i� _ irk �' L� .c;8 ! �� �, ! f ; ,R. �'trl �I J �. i yy x . All l'...'I ,,. r : `.'- -._,_. �i �t i .r } ,Y � , -R� � cr. `���•� - r' "' `W. �� � } .i� (� ..i _ 7. Sn. I r, t rf woi r r t 1 i r 5:r v X"L! C4) ZI 6, N , { i ....�. � r 1 � (' 'f � ���� �i4�� ' ., - �, 11!1 •• ` � l , : :�),V':' "` ,:,.. .a � ' .' ,•. . [E'.�'�i.'S�:: • ♦P Y � { 1 rN11N F. a 1 �'' "F,^{ ARI rN! .S �} :`'.. 1'494 s tis' n :• >3::R;x � 'k�'_ ::'�,' Y I. \'JJ�� - \ Ct_� 1 �,v' r: r.. JJ' t « 1 ^35E �• ,` ,. •.. + ''"` c T Sr` ..:`y - 5 ppp �� 1 9 .,. Y. rI nE 'rv , F p s � t •„ "I 1 1: 1� � �il rll(E .,, 'nrcl ux:'N 1 35Vy � /R; - :' ". r I r, I.,.NA w f x • r..,....r .H 6 :�'' i:i!:6 L. r - . ]T ,l ! r ey i` - \ T H. .'_" __...�.' - , ! `� �,�•.:� `� , a f <y11�} Il ,iel'` ijy vi p; � ji. _ '( a I w.• \..�.� I •� J.. .... .. r.,.. r�,t , E, N Li I v E.u•N r ,,, � t .' � ��� ;' ` � i ( a\ ( (� � 1'. r �.� ;� � .\ P �, ,:r_ , i ? ', •'••'•';$•t2: ,S .Alm ,l ][: ^., 0. '.;l .r. t t1 S} /+ Lrrn P: C Poo 1 t F 1 1 ;AgA H 6r E ... ., 1...! 4„ < 1 ., E : �- ` L_ i \ .! ; >. L r,;yM ? M A `O 1 I h ' -?! x� M « 5 ` S �' 't� ma - - 1. 1 ,` '7t r r _ 't •',:' a " r, ". •t - 1{1.104 >x : ;::'`'1' t � .i.' t MENICIN[ .. m:r �•. !}' � �i]YV.:.4 � '1� �"1. . r +i:�, r J � 'i r } ..,� -• � . i� .\n,cb '1 ` 'i�dr ' «��.'Z` `�•' N!v 1 l � t• �:%< <•y > �� , 4 Ic U IV ,Y r n r d . — �M ice'_ �: *N M V r l (NI v r lye I r i fi r. f ) r } '� i .� +. .-T �i ».,,.,.. ,.. .�, (:�. .:� _ 1. �4 .f1.. � . I'ge,y p�.•1 C S A.N.Ii$,� S T.1 I, �(..,.... frT 1 >,y, , ;F D?; �,y�t .4 �. U .r, -.. l '✓ r, i 't r ( mer eA r H.1b '. \i •L'r.r j� y� !ns I 9 { °,; '��� "'•""a i 4' 4 t .y ...... 1r 5.�UI_H ,- (( .. ':: <ra.. ,. 1 -9 A. \ \.. lAk[ NI.ti.Yft AA � �;• t •!, "• j/ f l • (( r r .. l ' °,( .". r. , (,'I . h� y1 •.� *. � L1� tr-�f�"r r� \. ;iifii:��i ?•i� 1 I 11 A i t l , 1 / . , j J s, y 4t),sr ' '; 3 f• -� r \ly i " f•. !� I '� orr, ry I =. l,'"` � ``�, 1 � r�r .f �I r 1't Ivl i ll' 1(kEi x�tr • • : ,AINr 0 } /�i'.,� �+''�. i ..) /" ` ,!` C:7 S;� j.H. 1• - t f€ :g yp: <� _ :1 ,ri_ 7 , tinr:E. T. • } v ., � ! •:. • � � , , �: `� ,t I ✓ � � � o t y d: , ... Eih ±�.,_ � m m_::a_ r y :Z..7.._.: ! .. ,,T,N 16 Ir CO asCow •• 1 �` :- t .•., m . r : '. .'' i Vr. // i 4 �.•.p y,1.: ~.: ,.� �\\,.. r' N�XrrA H: iv P F. 1 -494 L1 Y t;7.7- ?. CS4 ` .;:,B, ,J i '1,.,.., 110 { rr 'i rt j� 1 ;/ I � .. '.��x. ., >d .IL (" r 1 1 ) � ;� K: �i• >. •� }'`, :.. I } •�, ,•-� ,pEI L ( r te . •' lE�- N11 ;io s �T.H.7 : III i1[It:1iT9 _' ( � � W.� r Pun 1 a:[:I I : , °',- �...' _. '' � n` , ( �� ...,r ,� ;u,.' :k'� .r I nl ,, > {X �, .. 6 t . H! R 1 • i.AY.e h' �p . tN r I T.. {"1..:�t. -'s" i... i,�i�. �=.:.: .:r:. "{+.w f ~ ^ � (`(.7 A 1� H 6[ F ahioN IJ;" I '� . ". /I IN »., .�`•', T.H.a i P ti '{ ��� I i P { ( � y � O� Am Ft N • c.". — ti ''All' �'.'. �; �� - 1�� + ' l ! C44r. �I.S ���' :•',' — K .( 1 3SE,y ann' : r Ire14, t -ti '. 1 � ' 1 1- Ar. ..,«„ r / I � �""'� E PA(YININtI ftN � k� " ... � •, ! � v '.. 4... •/. „'.• l , Y I . .i,T t S.A w +mAa t ! �. � ..� 1' y. < �.. -" . ». -• 111 ` i r , , •r A Y -1\ µ:e.�� ' ::Y i�,.l �. l �1. L i � � \vl,� ,r .. •. ..t ' *' <• sEa`°c� :'•�'� �� + .rr ,, .t • S' t... 1,j C. ,J T.H,77 mr. A j , rE I11r t :.;:.r; i ,Ir'!7� f ,.: ' �,1 ° •,,. � 1 P�: r?J'i'�? >' �r `. A - . iT`' �' .. <E i' ,r.„ �. .r. r. N A ti I: A ,; �.•,, �� i � ..,, +., ~' � 'M"' �`�' ;.w <, <,r. ;�, .. � y c:l rM � .... /' f _ - snAnor['.E..S .. i (. 1. .:•:,::::• .�,•';::; ,a''1 °' �. ,.1 P b » < � fii I; « Hennepin County Stud Corridors Regional Railroad Y Authority T M & C No. 87 -19 November 6, 1987 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Final Agreement for Local Issues Addendum to Local 49- City of Brooklyn Center Labor Agreement To the Honorable Mayor and City Council: Attached please find a copy of the following documents: A letter from myself to the Local 49 Union Business Agent, a document dated 11/2/87 indicating the changes to Article B -II Sick Leave and Article B -VII Standby Pay, and a final copy of the new proposed local addendum to our labor agreement with Local 49. Last week` I reached final agreement with Local 49 on our local addendum to our contract. The term of the agreement on the local addendum is from January 1, 1987 terminating on December 31, 1969. The basic changes in the language of the addendum as a part of the new agreement involve the sick leave section and the standby pay section. In the sick leave section the addendum is changed to read the same as our personnel ordinance as it relates to the use of sick leave and an allowance for a maximum of four days use of sick leave for care of employee's children or spouse, and a dropping of the language in the procedures section of the sick leave article as it relates to absences in excess of three working days for statement of illness by medical practitioner. In the standby section we are making the changes necessary to allow for five hours of overtime pay for standby purposes over weekends rather than the existing language allowing for four hours standby pay. As a part of the agreement I have agreed to put in writing to the union (see attached letter ) a statement that I will recommend to the City Council the opening of the labor agreement for further negotiations if, during the term of this agreement, the City of Brooklyn Center offers an additional paid holiday to any organized or nonorganized group of employees. Also covered in the attached letter is a written statement as to our policy and current practice in paying maintenance III rates when employees maintain and operate maintenance III equipment. I believe the settlement represents a fair agreement and recommend it for your approval. Respectfully submitted, Gera G. Splinter, City anager CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF I:BROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTER EMERGENCY — POLICE - FIRE 9„ November 9, 1987 Mr. Tim Connors Area Business Representative International Union of operating Engineers Local 49 2829 Anthony Lane South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418 Dear Mr. Connors: As per our recent discussions regarding an agreement to settle our local addendum contract with Local 49, I am writing this letter to document my commitment to ask the City Council to reopen the local addendum section of this contract should any other organized or nonorganized group of employees in the City of Brooklyn Center receive additional holiday enefits during the Y g term of the local addendum agreement. gr ment. Also as a part of our discussion, I am confirming that it is the administrative policy of the City to pay maintenance III rates for up to two hours when an assigned employee is servicing or making inor e g repairs on a maintenance III rated piece of equipment they will operate during a given day. I hope this serves p to confirm our understanding with regard to this agreement. Thanking you for your patience and efforts in achieving this agreement, I am Sincerely, Gerald G. Splinter City Manager CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 11. -2 -87 PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO APPENDIX B, LOCAL ADDENDUM TO MASTER LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND IUOE LOCAL 49 ARTICLE B -II SICK LEAVE b. Usage Sick leave may be used [only] normally for absence from duty because of personal illness, injury, or legal quarantine of the employee or because of serious illness in the immediate family. Immediate family shall mean brother, sister, parents, parents -in -law, [wife] spouse or children of the employee. Sick leave may be used for the purpose of attending the funeral of immediate family members plus brothers -in -law, sisters -in -law, grandparents, grandparents - in -.law, and grandchildren of the employee. In addition to the preceding conditions supervisors may approve the use of sick leave, up to a maximum of four ( 4 ) days ( 32 hours) per calendar year for the care of the employee's children or spouse when the employee's supervisor determines that the situation requires the employee's presence The four (4) special use days (32 hours) cannot be accumulated from one year to the next, and if they are not used, they are included in the employee's normal sick leave accumulation d. Procedure In order to be eligible for sick leave with pay, employees must: 1. Notify their superior prior to the time set for the beginning of their normal work day. 2. Keep their superior informed of their condition. 3. Furnish a statement from a medical practitioner upon the request of the Employer [for absences in excess of three (3) work days, or] where the Employer has reason to believe that an employee has abused or is abusing sick leave. ARTICLE B -VII STANDBY PAY a. Public Utility employees who are designated by their Supervisor to serve in a "standby" status on behalf of the City on a weekend [Saturday, Sunday, or Holiday] will receive as compensation for such service five (5) hours of overtime Pay for the period beginning the end of the work day on Friday and ending the start of the work day on Monday when serving in such status. Public Utility employees who are designated by their Supervisors to serve in a "standby" status on behalf of the City on a holidav will receive as compensation for such service two (2) hours of overtime pay for each [day] holiday served in such status. Such standby pay shall be in addition to other compensation which the employee is entitled to under this AGREEMENT. (Underline indicates new material, brackets indicate material to be deleted.) APPENDIX B LOCAL ADDENDUM This supplementary agreement is entered into between the City of Brooklyn Center and the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49, AFL - CIO, for the period beginning January 1, 1987, and terminating on December 31, 1989, unless renewed or extended by mutual agreement of the parties. Nothing in this supplementary agreement may be in conflict with any provision of the MASTER AGREEMENT between MAMA, the City of Brooklyn Center, and IUOE, Local No. 49, AFL -CIO. In the event of conflict the MASTER AGREEMENT will prevail. ARTICLE B -I RELIEF AND MEAL PERIODS a. Two relief periods not to exceed fifteen (15) minutes are authorized at a racticable time within each employee's shift. One relief P period may be taken during the first half of the shift and the second relief period may be taken during the second half of the shift. b. Each employee shall be authorized one unpaid thirty (30) minute meal period per shift. ARTICLE B -II SICK LE AVE a. Eligibility Sick leave with pay shall be granted to probationary and permanent employees at the rate of eight hours for each calendar month of full -time service or major fraction thereof, except that sick leave granted probationary employees shall not be available for use until satisfactory completion of the initial probationary period. b. Usage Sick leave may be used normally for absence from duty because of personal illness, injury, or legal quarantine of the employee, or because of serious u illness in the immediate family. Immediate family shall mean brother, sister, parents, parents -in- law, spouse, or children of the employee. Sick leave may be used for the purpose of attending the funeral of immediate family members plus brothers -in -law, sisters -in -law, grandparents, grandparents- in- law, and grandchildren of the employee. In addition to the preceding conditions, supervisors may approve the use of sick leave, up to a maximum of four (4) days (32 hours) per calendar year, for the care of the employee's children or spouse when the employee's supervisor determines that the situation requires the employee's presence. The four (4) special use days (32 hours) cannot be accumulated from one year to the next, and if they are not used, they are included in the employee's normal sick leave accumulation. B -1 c. Accrual Sick leave shall accrue at the rate of eight hours per month until 960 hours have been accumulated and at the rate of four hours per month after the 960 hours have been accumulated. Employees using earned vacation leave or sick leave shall be considered to be working for the purposes of accumulating additional sick leave. Worker's Compensation benefits shall be credited against the compensation due employees during sick leave. d. Procedure In order to be eligible for sick leave with pay, employees must: 1. Notify their superior prior to the time set for the beginning of their normal work day. 2. Keep their superior informed of their condition. 3. Furnish a statement from a medical practitioner upon the request of the Employer where the Employer has reason to believe that an employee has abused or is abusing sick leave. e. Misuse Prohibited Employees claiming sick leave when physically fit, except as otherwise specifically authorized in ARTICLE B -II, b shall be subject to disciplinary action up to and including discharge. ARTICLE B -III SEVERANCE PAY Severance pay in the amount of one -third the accumulated sick leave employees have to their credit at the time of resignation shall be paid to employees who have been employed for at least five consecutive years. If discharged for cause, severance pay shall not be allowed. ARTICLE B -IV VACATION LEAVE a. Amount Permanent employees shall earn vacation leave at a rate of 6.67 hours for each calendar month of full -time service or major fraction thereof. Permanent employees with five consecutive years of service through ten consecutive years of service shall earn vacation at the rate of 120 hours per year. Permanent employees with more than ten consecutive years of service shall earn vacation leave according to the following schedule: During llth year of service 128 hours per year. During 12th year of service 136 hours per year. During 13th year of service 144 hours per year. During 14th year of service 152 hours per year. During 15th year of service 160 hours per year. Employees using earned vacation leave or sick leave shall be considered to be working for purposes of accumulating additional vacation leave. B -2 1 b. Usage Vacation leave may be used as earned, except that the EMPLOYER shall approve the time at which the vacation leave may be taken. No employee shall be allowed vacation leave until after satisfactorily completing his initial probationary period. Employees shall not be permitted to waive vacation leave and receive double pay. C. Accrual An employee may accumulate no more than 200 hours of vacation in addition to the vacation leave the employee earns during the current calendar year. d. Termination Provisions Employees leaving the service of the EMPLOYER in good standing, after having given the EMPLOYER proper notice of termination of employment, shall be compensated for vacation leave accrued and unpaid, computed to the date of separation. ARTICLE B -V HOLIDAY LEAVE a. Holidays Defined Holiday leave shall be granted for the following holidays. New Year's Day, January 1; Washington's and Lincoln's Birthdays, third Monday in February; Memorial Day, last Monday in May; Independence Day, July 4; Labor Day, first Monday in September; Christopher Columbus Day, second !Monday in October; Veteran's Day, November 11; Thanksgiving Day, fourth Thursday in November; Post- Thanksgiving Day, Friday after fourth Thursday in November; Christmas Day, December 25; and one floating holiday annually to be scheduled with permission of the employee's supervisor. Floating holidays must be taken within the calendar year; they cannot be accumulated. b. When New Year's Day, Independence Day, Veteran's Day or Christmas Day fall on Sunday, the following day shall be observed as a holiday. When they fall on Saturday, the preceding day shall be observed as a holiday. Employees' absence from work on the day following or the day preceding such a three -day holiday weekend without the express authorization of the EMPLOYER shall forfeit rights to holiday pay for that holiday. C. Employees working a normal Monday through Friday workweek, who are required to be on duty on any holiday, shall be paid time and one - half for the hours worked in addition to the base pay rate. ARTICLE B -VI COVERALLS a. The EMPLOYER will purchase and maintain sufficient sets of work coveralls to be available and specifically assigned for wear by employees, other than mechanics, when engaged in unusually dirty tasks for the respective job classification. A determination of coverall assignments shall rest exclusively with the EMPLOYER. Mechanics shall be provided coveralls. B -3 ARTICLE B -VII STANDBY PAY a. Public Utility employees who are designated by their Supervisor to serve in a "standby" status on behalf of the City on a weekend will receive as compensation for such service five (5) hours of overtime pay for the period beginning the end of the work day on Friday and ending the start of the work day on Monday when serving in such status. Public Utility employees who are designated by their Supervisors to serve in a "standby" status on behalf of the City on a holiday will receive as compensation for such service two (2) hours of overtime pay for each holiday served in such status. Such standby pay shall be in addition to other compensation which the employee is entitled to under this AGREEMENT. ARTICLE B -VIII PART -TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Part -time employees shall not be eligible to receive fringe benefits under this AGREEMENT. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 49: DATED DATED B -4 LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS FOR 1988 On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses: Class A• Red Lobster Restaurant Yen Ching Restaurant Class B• Applebee's Days Inn Earle Brown Bowl Green Mill Ground Round ,Holiday Inn 'T. Wrights Class C• Lynbrook Bowl Class D: This is the probationary classification. The only license we have in this class is La Casita. As their license just went into effect on December 7, 1987 for this year, we are just now processing their renewal papers. Therefore, their 1988 license will be on the next City Council meeting agenda. Sunday Liquor: (in connection with on -sale intoxicating) Applebee's Days Inn Earle Brown Bowl Green Mill Ground Round Holiday Inn Lynbrook Bowl Red Lobster T. Wrights Yen Ching On -sale Club License: Duoos Brothers American Legion Post #630 On -Sale Wine License: Denny's Restaurant . LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS FOR 1988 (Continued) On -Sale Nonintoxicating Liquor Licenses: Beacon Bowl Chuck Wagon Inn Davanni's The 50's Grill Little Brooklyn Pizza Hut Rocky Rococo Scoreboard Pizza I I CITY OF BROOKYN CENTER LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS FOR 1988 FOOD /LIQUOR RATION FIGURES On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses: Percentage Food Sales Restaurant 63.8% Applebee's 68.2% Days Inn (formerly Holiday Inn) 57.5% Earle Brown Bowl 76.8% Green Mill 62.6% Ground Round 55.3 Holiday Inn (formerly Ramada) 41.9% Lynbrook Bowl 85.6% Red Lobster 65.0% T. Wrights 93.4% Yen Ching On -sale Wine License: 99.0% Denny's MEMORANDUM TO: Chief James Lindsay FROM: Captain Scott Kline DATE: December 8, 1987 SUBJECT: Police Department Liquor License Annual Report This report is a summary of all Police Department actions taken in and around liquor establishments holding on -sale liquor licenses, on -sale wine licenses and nonintoxicating liquor licenses within the City of Brooklyn Center. 'The current number of license holders in the City of Brooklyn Center is twenty, although, one of these is in a period of transition as of the date of this report. That is the Chuck Meur's license which was terminated and La Casita which has not yet begun operation, but will be later this month. Officers responded to 571 calls for service and issued 130 citations for parking offenses for a total of 701 calls in and around liquor establishments during the reporting period. This is a decrease of approximately 100 incidents from 1986, but is still 180 calls higher than 1985 and 1984. The Police Department's pro - active detail did continue their surveillance and arrests around liquor establishments and other evening gathering places and may have assisted in discouraging some of the thefts and vandalisms which had plagued these establishments in the past. The American Legion Club - 4307 70th Avenue North There were eight (8) reported incidents at the American Legion Club during the reporting period. The incident which began in 1986 over the gambling violation and resulted in the suspension of the gambling license at the club and a subsequent closer relationship with the City in straightening out the affairs of the club appears to have had a positive effect. The current governing body of the Legion Club is meeting on a regular basis with officials from the city and appears to be making slow but steady progress in making sure they are in control of what is taking place at their club on a day -to -day basis. This has led to a couple of the incidents listed below. One (1) was a theft from the Legion treasury belonging to the Auxiliary and one (1) was a possible theft from their gambling treasury which turned out to be unfounded. A party was charged in the Legion Auxiliary losses and restitution was made. Memorandum December 8, 1987 Page 2 1 - Warrant Arrest 1 - Serving Without a License in February 1 - Lockout 1 - Theft from Legion Auxiliary Treasury 1 - Theft from the Gambling Treasury 2 - Miscellaneous Public 1 - Background Investigation of Bar Employees Applebee's - 1347 Brookdale Center There were 16 reported incidents at Applebee's during the reporting period, two (2) of which were minors procuring alcohol in which there were employees cited at the scene and one (1) was an incident with the manager and a couple of employees drinking in the bar after hours and these h e parties were also cited. It was explained to them that the law on liquor being totally removed by 1:00 AM applied to employees, even though they were just cleaning • up. There have been no further problems since that time. 3 - Fights in Lot 1 - Theft 2 - Vandalisms 1 - Lockout 1 - To Detox Beacon Bowl - 6525 Lyndale Avenue North There were two (2) reported incidents at the Beacon Bowl in the past twelve months. 1 - Theft from Auto 1 - Accident Chuck Meur's La Casita - 210 Freeway Boulevard There were ten (10) calls for service at Chuck Meur's during the reporting period, all of which were before they closed their doors in the Fall. 4 - Lockouts 2 - Alarms 1 - Handicap Tag Memorandum December 8, 1987 Page 3 1 - Theft from Auto 1 - Disorderly Conduct Arrest 1 - Auto Theft Chuck Wagon Inn - 5720 Morgan Avenue North There were two (2) calls to the Chuck Wagon Inn during the reporting period. h 1 -' Burglary of a Business 1 - Miscellaneous Public Davanni's - 5937 Summit Drive There were eight (8) calls for service to Davanni's Restaurant during the reporting period none of which appears to be of any cause for concern. 3 - Lockouts 1 - Bike Theft 1 - Found Property 1 - Accident 2 - Miscellaneous Public Denny's Restaurant - 3901 Lakebreeze Avenue North There were 14 calls for service at Denny's during the reporting period, none of which appears to be cause for concern. Of the two (2) Thefts from Auto reported at Denny's, there was one (1) arrest made in one of the incidents. 2 - Accidents 2 - Thefts 2 - Lockouts 2 - Med icals 1 - Vandalism 1 - Fight 1 - Car Fire Earle Brown Bowl - 6440 James Circle There were only 84 calls to Earle Brown Bowl during this reporting period. This is a decrease of 21 from the previous Memorandum December 8, 1987 Page 4 year. There were a number of arrests by the pro - active detail in the lot of the Earle Brown Bowl with six (6) being for Possession of Drugs, two (2) for Vandalism, one (1) for Minor Possession, one (1) for DWI. There were six (6) assaults which all took place in the parking lot. Four (4) of these assaults were committed b the same person who as eventually prosecuted. It Y P w w Y P does not appear that any of the incidents at the Earle Brown Bowl is a direct result of the operation of the bar or the liquor license operation. 6 - Possession of Marijuana Arrests 12 - Vandalisms - 2 Arrests 13.- Miscellaneous Public 5 - Accidents 12 - Thefts from Auto 13 - Lockouts 3 - Thefts 3 - Medicals 4 - Handicap Parking 6 - Assaults 3 - Fights 2 - To Detox 1 - Minor in Possession - 1 Arrest 1 - DWI Arrest 1 - Forgery 1 - Auto Theft 1 - Warrant Arrest 50's Grill - 5524 Brooklyn Boulevard There were seven (7) calls for service to the 50's Grill during the reporting period none of which appears to be noteworthy. 3 - Lockouts 1 - Theft 1 - Medical 1 - Miscellaneous Public 1 - Parking Tag Green Mill Restaurant - 5540 B rooklyn Boulevard There were 28 calls for service at the Green Mill during the reporting period. Of these, 12 were handicap parking tags issued i Memorandum December 8 1987 Page 5 at the establishment. None of the calls appear to be noteworthy. 1 - Cab No Pay 3 - Thefts from Auto 1 - Medical 2 - Lockouts 1 - Warrant Arrest 1 - Accident 7 _ Miscellaneous Public Ground Round - 2545 County Road 10 There were 18 calls for service to the Ground Round during the reporting period. None appears to be of any significance. 7 - Alarms 6 - Lockouts 1 - Fire Lane Tag 1 - Warrant Arrest 1 - Theft from Auto 2 - Miscellaneous Public Holiday Inn (Days Inn - 1501 Freeway Boulevard There were 124 calls for service to the Holiday Inn during the reporting period. None of these appear to be directly related to the operation of the bar or the liquor license. The changeover in name does not have any effect on the management of the liquor license itself. Arrests were made in four (4) separate incidents, all of which took place out in the motel itself or in the lot. The first was an arrest of several juveniles for Thefts from Auto, the arrest of one (1) party involved in a fight, one (1) juvenile arrested for drinking in the lot and one (1) party arrested for possession of drugs in the lot. 18 - Thefts from Auto 16 - Thefts of Property Within the Motel 8 - Vandalisms 6 - Parties Taken to Detox 5 - Medicals 2 - Forgeries 2 - Warrant Arrests 5 - Accidents Memorandum December 8, 1987 Page 6 2 - Incidents of Found Property 1 - Suicide Attempt 1 - Robbery 1 - Fight 1 - Auto Theft 1 - Auto Recovery 1 - Minor Consumption 1 - Possession of Drugs 3 -,Parking Tags ` 29 Miscellaneous Public Little Brooklyn - 6219 Brooklyn Boulevard There were only two (2) calls for service to Little Brooklyn during the reporting period, neither of which is significant. 1 - Lockout - 1 - Miscellaneous Public Lynbrook Bowl - 6357 North Lilac Drive There were 208 calls for service at this establishment during the reporting period. Of these 208, 98 were citations written for parking violations in and about the lot. There was a significant increase in the number of arrests made in the lot at this establishment because of the fact that this is one of the areas that the pro- active detail concentrated on within the city. The following is a listing of the arrests made in and about the lot. There were nine (9) arrests made for Possession of Drugs, one (1) arrest made for Indecent Conduct, one (1) arrest for Assault, one (1) DWI arrest and one (1) Minor Consumption arrest. Additionally, there were three (3) arrests made in a burglary of the business by the dog watch personnel. Although there is a large number of reported incidents, it does not appear that any of these directly relate to the operation of the liquor license. 98 - Parking Violations 6 - Thefts from Auto 5 - Thefts from Building 7 - Vandalisms 8 - Fights Memorandum December 8, 1987 Page 7 13 - Lockouts 6 - Warrant Arrests 3 - Medicals 3 - Incidents of Possession of Narcotics 1 - Indecent Conduct 5 - Parties to Detox 2 - Assaults 1 - Auto Theft 4 - Alarms 1 -',DWI Arrest 2 - Burglaries 1 - Forgery l.- Minor Consumption 2 - Property Damage Accidents 33 - Miscellaneous Public Scoreboard Pizza - 6800 Humboldt Avenue North There were five (5) calls for service during the reporting period, none of which appears to indicate any problem. 2 - Miscellaneous Public 1 - To Detox 1 - Theft 1 - Medical Pizza Hut - 6002 Shingle Creek Parkway There were four (4) calls for service to the Pizza Hut during the reporting period, three (3) of which were lockouts and one (1) was a Miscellaneous Public. None of these appear to indicate any problem. Ramada Inn (Holiday Inn ) - 2200 Freeway Boulevard There were 86 calls for service at the Ramada Inn during the reporting period. There were six (6) fights reported by the management in the area of their parking lot. Of the six (6) fights reported to the department, five (5) resulted in arrests and the pro- active detail was able to make a couple of arrests for theft. 13 - Lockouts Memorandum December 8, 1987 Page 8 10 - Thefts from Auto 9 - Other Thefts 8 - Parking Tags 2 - Alarms 7 - Vandalisms 5 - Medicals 2 - Auto Thefts 1 - Found Property" 12 - Miscellaneous Public 2 - License Updates for Changes in Personnel Red Lobster Restaurant - 7235 Brooklyn Boulevard There were 21 calls for service to the Red Lobster during the reporting period, none of which appears to be a particular problem. 6 - Alarms 2 - Lockouts 2 - Thefts from Auto 2 - Parking Tags 1 - Accident 1 - Theft 7 - Miscellaneous Public T. Wright's - 5800 Shingle Creek Parkway There were 42 reported incidents at this establishment during the reporting period, which is a decrease of approximately half the incidents reported in 1986. There was only one (1) incident which required department attention which involved the possibility of after -hours drinking by employees. This was unsubstantiated, but there were no further incidents so the stern warning by the department was believed to have sufficed. 8 - Thefts from Auto 4 - Lockouts 5 - Alarms 7 - Thefts 2 - Fights 2 - Medicals 2 - Vandalisms 1 - Warrant Arrest Memorandum December 8, 1987 Page 9 1 - Assault - 1 Arrest 1 - Accident 7 - Miscellaneous Public 2 - Backgrounds for Employee Changes Yen Ching Restaurant - 5900 Shingle Creek Parkway There were seven (7) reported incidents at the. Yen Ching Restaurant during the reporting period, none of which are related to the liquor license operation. 2 - Vandalisms 1 - Theft from Auto 1 - Lockout 1 - Medical 2 - Miscellaneous Public t Licenses to be approved by the City Council on December 14, 1987: CHRISTMAS TREE SALES LOT B & S Tree Company 5120 N. Lilac Drive �. Q • W CZ/L�ivC Director of Planning 4.k and Inspection CIGARETTE American Amusement Arcades 850 Decatur Ave. N. Brooklyn Center Liquor #1 1500 69th Ave. N. Brooklyn Center Liquor #2 6250 Brooklyn Blvd. Brooklyn Center Liquor #3 5711 Morgan Ave. N. Chuck Wagon Inn 5720 Morgan Ave. N. Denny's Restaurant 3901 Lakebreeze Ave. N. Red Lobster 7235 Brooklyn Blvd. Bill's Vending Service 7317 West Broadway Brooklyn Service Center 6245 Brooklyn Blvd. Brooklyn Center American Legion 4307 70th Ave. N. Brooks Superette, Inc. 6804 Humboldt Ave. N. Country Club Market 5715 Morgan Ave. N. D.V.M. Inc. 119 State Street Green Mill Inn 5540 Brooklyn Blvd. Days Inn 1501 Freeway Blvd. M & S Drug Emporium 5900 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Ideal Drug 6800 Humboldt Ave. N. Duke's Standard 6501 Humboldt Ave. N. * Red Owl Country Store 3600 63rd Ave. N. Wes' Amoco 6044 Brooklyn Blvd. City Clerk 4k COMMERCIAL KENNEL Northbrook Animal Hospital 413 66th Ave. N. Sanitarian �c FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LaCasita Restaurant 2101 Freeway Blvd. Sanitarian Ajc GASOLINE SERVICE STATION Brookdale Car Wash 5500 Brooklyn Blvd. Brooklyn Center Post Office 6848 Lee Ave. N. Brooklyn Center Service "76" 6245 Brooklyn Blvd. Davies Water Equipment Co. 4010 Lakebreeze Ave. N. Duke's Standard 6501 Humboldt Ave. N. Green Meadows 3319 49th Ave. N. Superamerica 1901 57th Ave. N. Superamerica 6545 West River Road City Clerk ►/ LODGING ESTABLISHMENT Days Inn 1501 Freeway Blvd. 0 Northwest Residence 4408 69th Ave. N. Riverside Motel 5608 Lyndale Ave. N. Thrifty Scot Motel 6445 James Circle T , Sanitarian �,(c_ MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Acme Sheet Metal 2315 Hampden Ave. Aircorp 2525 Nevada Ave. N. Doody Mechanical Contractors 520 Front Ave. Guaranty Heating Co. 11741 Elm Creek Road n /1� Pump & Meter Service, Inc. 1800 2nd Street S. (`. Vt -� Building Official Zk POOL AND BILLIARDS TABLE American Amusement Arcades 850 Decatur Ave. N. Brooklyn Center Comm. Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Days Inn 1501 Freeway Blvd. City Clerk PUBLIC DANCE Days Inn 1501 Freeway Blvd. City Clerk GENERAL APPROVAL: D. k. Weeks, City Clerk