The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986 07-14 CCP Regular Session CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER JULY 14, 1986 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Open Forum 5. Approval of Consent Agenda All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which � , h event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal 1 se ence on the agenda. 6. Approval of Minutes - June 23, 1986 - ;Regular Session *7. Final Plat: a. Twin City Federal Registered Land Survey located at the intersection of County Road 10 and Xerxes Avenue North *8. Mayoral Appointment: a. Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Citizen Participation Plan 9. Resolutions: a.- Accepting Bid and Approving Contract for Sealcoating of Streets (Improvement Project No. 1986 -12, Contract 1986 -J) b. Establishing Project, Accepting City Engineer's Report, Calling for a Hearing Thereon and Approving Plans and Specifications for Street Improvement Project No. 1986 -10; 69th and 70th Avenues North Dupont Avenue to T.H. 252 (Contract 1986 -M) c. Establishing Parking Restrictions on 69th and 70th Avenues North between Camden Avenue North and Dupont Avenue North d. Establishing Project, Accepting City Engineer's Report and Approving Plans and Specifications for Humboldt Sidewalk Improvement Project No. 1986 -06 (Contract 1986 -N) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- July 14, 1986 e. Approving Specifications ' PP g p ications for. Four (4) Police Patrol. Sedans f. Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract for Four (4) Police Patrol Sedans g. Approving Contingency Appropriation for Purchase of Replacement Lawn Mower h. Approving Agreement for Design Services for Improvement of Storm Sewer System Through Centerbrook Golf Course 10. Public Hearing: (7:30 p.m.) -A public hearing is scheduled for 7:30 p.m. on an application for a private kennel license from Jeffrey S. Lewis and Janelle L. Klimek. 11. Public Hearing: (8:00 p.m.) a. Hearing on proposed assessment for 1985 diseased shade tree removal costs. 1. Resolution Certifying 1985 Diseased Shade Tree Removal Costs to the Hennepin County Tax Rolls 12 Ordinance: a. An Ordinance Amending Chapters 8 and 23 of the City Ordinances Regarding Licensing of Bottled and Canned Soft Drinks -This ordinance is offered for a first reading this evening. 13. Discussion Items: a. Appropriation of Funds for Development of ULTIMAP System by LOGIS -This item was tabled preliminary discussion at the June 23 Council meeting. b Tourism Bureau C. Policy for Acquisition of Property Along Mississippi River between 53rd and 57th Avenue North d. Schedule for Planning and Inspection Department Fees *14. Licenses 15. Adjournment MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION JUNE 23, 1986 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:14 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, and Rich Theis. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Works Sy Knapp, Finance Director Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning & Inspection Ron Warren, City Attorney Bill Jordan, HRA Coordinator Brad Hoffman, Personnel Coordinator Geralyn Barone, and Administrative Aid Patti Page. Mayor Nyquist noted that Councilmember Hawes was ill and would not be in attendance at this evening's meeting. OPEN FORUM Mayor Nyquist noted the Council had received a request from Bernard Ackerson, 3713 53rd Place, regarding bicycle trails. Mayor Nyquist recognized Mr. Ackerson who stated that he rides his bicycle just about everywhere and he has noticed that there are some places within the City which are hard to reach by bike. He stated he would like the City to recognize some of these difficult areas and possibly do some more construction. The City Manager stated that the City has only completed part of the total trail system and that bike routes are looked at as reconstruction is done. Mr. Ackerson stated that one area in particular which is difficult to ride in is the area of Northport school turning north onto Brooklyn Boulevard. He asked if City staff would welcome comments regarding difficult biking areas. The City Manager responded affirmatively. Councilmember Scott suggested that this would be a good discussion item for a future Park & Recreation Commission meeting. Mayor Nyquist inquired if there was anyone else present- in the audience who wished to address the Council. There being none, he continued with the regular agenda items. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Nyquist inquired if any Councilmembers requested any items removed from the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Theis requested the minutes from the June 2 Board of Equalization meeting and special session of the Council be removed from the Consent Agenda. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 19 1986 - REGULAR SESSION There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve the minutes of the May 19, 1986 City Council meeting as submitted. The motion passed. PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASE FOR BROOKLYN CENTER SERVICE 6849 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 6 -23 -86 -1- There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to release the performance guarantee in the amount of $20,000 for Brooklyn Center Service, 6849 Brooklyn Boulevard (Planning Commission Application No. 84020). The motion passed. PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASE FOR QUICK LUBE 6806 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to release the performance guarantee in the amount of $6,500 for Quick Lube, 6806 Brooklyn Boulevard (Planning Commission Application No. 84038). The motion passed. RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 86 -95 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER WEST FIRE STATION HVAC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1985 -25 - The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -96 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER GRANDVIEW PARK LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -11 • The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -97 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR 1985 DISEASED SHADE TREE REMOVAL COSTS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -98 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN METROPOLITAN CLINIC OF COUNSELING, INC. - AND THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR AN EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -99 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 6 -23 -86 -2- RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1986 GENERAL FUND BUDGET S The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded b g g y y member Celia Scott, and the motion passed unanimously. LICENSES There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve the following list of licenses: AMUSEMENT DEVICE - OPERATOR Brookdale East Cinema 5801 John Martin Drive Brooklyn Center Community Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Earle Brown Bowl 6445 James Circle Lynbrook Bowl 6357 North Lilac Drive MTC 6845 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Red Lobster Restaurant 7235 Brooklyn Boulevard UA Plaza 5810 Shingle Creek Pkwy. AMUSEMENT DEVICE - VENDOR Advance Carter Company 850 Decatur Avenue B & K Music & Vending Co. 3420 Nicollet Avenue S. CIGARETTE LICENSE Amoco 6600 West River Road Target 6100 Shingle Creek Pkwy'. FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE Amoco 6600 West River Road Brookdale Mobil 5710 Xerxes Avenue North Burger King 6110 Brooklyn Boulevard Green Mill Inn, Inc. - 5540 Brooklyn Boulevard Mui Li Wan Inc. 6800 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Pizza Huts of the Northwest 6000 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Target 6100 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Video Revue 5810 Xerxes Avenue North GASOLINE SERVICE STATION LICENSE Amoco 6600 West River Road ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE Blue Bell Ice Cream Co. 3218 Snellin g Avenue Brooklyn Center Community Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Green Mill Inn Inc. 5540 Brooklyn Boulevard Tom Higgins 830 West Larpenteur Avenue George Nerburn 1100 Emerson Lane North Scoreboard Pizza 6816 Humboldt Avenue N. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS LICENSE Air Comfort, Inc. 3944 Louisiana Circle Ganley's Heating & Air Cond. 2401 80th Avenue N. Loop- Belden- Porter Co. 315 Royalston Avenue N. Standard Heating & Air Cond. 410 West Lake Street 6 -23 -86 -3- Stout Mechanical P.O. Box 6305 NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE NSI /Griswold Corp. 8300 10th Avenue N. Travelers North 6601 Shingle Creek Pkwy. PERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE NSI /Griswold Corp. 8300 10th Avenue N. Travelers North 6601 Shingle Creek Pkwy. RENTAL DWELLING LICENSE Initial: RFCI Property Management - 5240 Drew Avenue N. Robert E. Johnson 7218 -7224 West River Road Renewal: Darrell A. Farr Development Beach Condominiums Thomas K. Williams 5200 France Avenue North Martha Lahti 5316 Knox Avenue North Martha Lahti 5322 Knox Avenue North H. & Val J. Rothschild, Inc. 5300 -5322 Ponds Drive H. & Val J. Rothschild, Inc. 5301 -5315 Ponds Drive H. & Val J. Rothschild, Inc. 5319 -5333 Ponds Drive H. & Val J. Rothschild, Inca 5400 -5422 Ponds Drive H. & Val J. Rothschild, Inca 5401 -5423 Ponds Drive H. & Val J. Rothschild, Inc. 5426 -5448 Ponds Drive H. & Val J. Rothschild, Inc. 5427 -5441 Ponds Drive ROI Properties, Inc. 7109 -7113 Unity Avenue N. H. & Val J. Rothschild, Inc. 7225 -7247 Unity Avenue N. H. & Val J. Rothschild, Inc. 7240 -7254 Unity Avenue N. H. & Val J. Rothschild, Inc. 7251 -7273 Unity Avenue N. H. & Val J. Rothschild, Inc. 7260 -7274 Unity Avenue N. Sigmund Bona __5207 Xerxes Avenue North Richard and Sharon Krawiecki 5209 Xerxes Avenue North Frances M. Lunacek 5211 Xerxes Avenue North Tracy Rice 5836 Xerxes Avenue North Diane and Eugene Wright 4408 69th Avenue North SIGN HANGERS LICENSE Cragg Inc 9636 85th Avenue North Daniel Signs 40 Southwest 4th Street SWIMMING POOL LICENSE Chippewa Park Apartments 6507 Camden Avenue North Spa Petite 2920 County Road 10 The motion passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -..,.JUNE 2 1986 - BOARD OF EQUALIZATION MEETING Councilmember Theis stated that he had these minutes and the special session minutes removed from the Consent Agenda because he was not present at the meeting. There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by 6 -23 -86 -4- Councilmember Scott to approve the minutes of the Board of Equalization meeting of June 2, 1986 as submitted. The motion passed. Councilmember Theis abstained from the vote. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 2 1986 - REGULAR SESSION There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by 'Councilmember Lhotka to approve the minutes of the special session of the City Council meeting of June 2, 1986 as submitted. The motion passed, with Councilmember Theis abstaining from the vote. RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED) The City Manager presented a Resolution Authorizing Execution of Developer's Agreement. He noted that this resolution confirms the action taken earlier by the HRA. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -100 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Gene Lhotka, and the motion passed unanimously. The City Manager presented a Resolution Rejecting All Bids for Centerbrook Golf Course Buildings. He stated that the bids received were all substantially higher than the estimates we had received. The Director of Public Works stated that staff recommends rejecting all bids and readvertising for bids with a new set of plans and specifications. He went on to give a brief explanation of the new plans and stated that the proposed building would be somewhat smaller than the current proposal. Councilmember Lhotka asked if there had been any structural changes in the proposed building. The Director of Public Works stated that in the previous proposal the building would have had a poured in place concrete floor, but in the proposed _plan the floor would be a precast, hollow concrete floor. He explained that the exposed aggregate concrete had been removed to reduce the cost and the weight of the building. Mayor Nyquist noted that there appears to be an approximate 25% reduction in size, and he asked how this .his would reduce the cost. He also asked if, in the future, the City would regret the size reduction. The Director of Public Works stated that there would be an approximate 20% reduction in cost. He added that staff is still quite comfortable with the size of the proposed building and feels it will be a very adequate space. Councilmember Theis asked if there would be any windows in the club house which would face the parking lot. The Director of Public Works responded negatively. Councilmember Theis stated he felt it may be a good idea to have windows facing the parking lot so that the area could be monitored. The City Manager stated that staff would look at the possibility of adding windows facing the parking lot. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -101 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR CENTERBROOK GOLF COURSE BUILDINGS (PROJECT NO. 1985 -23, PHASE II, CONTRACT 1986 -K) 6 -23 -86 -5- The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Rich Theis, and the motion passed unanimously. NORTH MISSISSIPPI REGIONAL PARK PLAN The City Manager introduced Shirley Bonine, Vice Chairman, and Marty Jessen, Associate Chairman, of the Hennepin Suburban Park District. Ms. Bonine stated that the Park Board had voted to accept the plan leaving the west side of Lyndale out of the proposed plan. Councilmember Theis asked why the area on the west side of Lyndale had been left out of the plan. Mr. Jessen stated that the neighbors in the area were quite concerned over the proposed park plan due to the fact that they had just been put through the construction of the I -94 freeway and the difficult reconstruction project on Lyndale Avenue. They stated that they had a desire to maintain the area as a neighborhood and they did not want to lose their equity advantages. Councilmember Theis asked why this area had initially been included in the proposed plan. Mr. Jessen stated that the proposed plan has a limited amount of space and that using the area on the west side of Lyndale would have allowed them to add more features to the park. As it stands now, the park would offer trail systems on the east side of Lyndale. Councilmember Theis asked if there would be any users' fees for these parks. Mr. Jessen stated that there had been very little discussion on this topic and that they would be discussing it more in the future. Councilmember Theis asked if the west side of Lyndale is permanently out of the plan or just for the moment. Mr. Jessen stated that it is permanently out of the proposed park plan unless the City or the State specifically ask for reconsideration in the future. Councilmember Lhotka asked what would happen to the existing pump station that it is on the east side of Lyndale. The City Manager stated that it will stay on the site but there will be some beautification plans for the area. Councilmember Lhotka inquired about the boat launch that is now at Riverridge Park. The City Manager stated that with the widening of the I -694 bridge, it would most likely eliminate the boat launch area on the south side of the bridge. Mayor Nyquist recognized Tony Schmid, 5500 Lyndale Avenue North, who stated that when the plans and construction of I -94 and the reconstruction of Lyndale Avenue were taking place, the City did not state that they had any short or long term plans for a park in the area. He asked whether the residents had not been given the full truth two years ago, or if the Council is now acting on the whims of legislators. Mayor Nyquist stated that neither he nor any of the other Councilmembers knew anything of these park plans when the reconstruction took place on Lyndale Avenue. He stated that he is quite disturbed by the way this whole park plan came about. Mr. Schmid stated that he would like the Council to reject the project until a firm time frame has been set. Mr. Jessen stated that the final acquisitions should all take place within eight years. He added that they have no other firm dates from that point. Mayor Nyquist recognized Mr. Bud Murphy, 5607 Lyndale Avenue North, who asked if there is money immediately available to acquire these homes or if the residents would be left hanging in limbo because of the lack of funds. The City Manager stated that it was his understanding that there is money available for when the residents are ready to sell. Ms. Bonine stated that there, are $1.5 million 6 -23 -86 -6- set aside for the acquisition. Mr. Murphy asked if the park board would condemn or wait until the residents are ready to sell. Ms. Bonine stated that the residents could stay in their homes as long as they wanted. She added that the park board does not have the authority to condemn a property. Mr. Schmid asked what would happen with the proposed park if the City Council rejects the plan. The City Manager stated that nothing could be done at this point. Ms. Bonine stated that the park board did not initiate this plan, it was the State Legislature. Councilmember Lhotka asked if a person were to "stay in his home for 20 years would he receive a fair market value on his home. Mr. Jessen stated that at the time a person is ready to sell his home, a market appraisal would be done and that the price would be set at a fair market value. Councilmember Scott stated that one of the main objections from the City and the school district was the tax loss. She noted that the school district is also very concerned with the loss of students. Mr. Jessen stated that there would be a four year tax repayment plan of the City taxes. He stated the first year after the sale 80% of the City taxes would be paid and then downward to 60 %, 40% and 20 %. Councilmember Lhotka stated that he has some concerns for the people that are living there presently. He asked if there was anything that could be done to set a firmer time frame. The City Manager stated that parts of the proposed park plan could be completed before all the properties were sold. Councilmember Lhotka stated that he is worried about making a decision that could affect people 20 years from now. He then asked if there has been any studies done that indicate that there will be people to use the park. Mr. Jessen stated that once the park is developed there would be a.great many uses for it. The City Manager stated that staff would anticipate great usage of the park and that the more activity in the area the less vandalism that would occur. There was a motion by Councilmember Theis to concur with the recommendation submitted by the Park and Recreation Commission. The motion died for lack of a. second. There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka to reject the entire concept of the proposed park. Councilmember Scott inquired if rejecting the concept of the park would also be saying that the City's Comprehensive Plan is wrong. The City Manager noted that at this present time the proposed park plan meets the requirements of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Upon vote being taken on the foregoing motion, Mayor Nyquist seconded the motion. Councilmember Lhotka noted that if the Council accepts the plan nothing will be done in the park for at least eight years. He added that everything in the plan is so undefined except for the boundaries. He added that he felt some day, if and when all the property became available to the City, the City would have more control than if it were owned by Hennepin County. Upon vote being taken on the preceding motion, the motion passed. RECESS 6 -23 -86 -7- The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 8:35 pm. and reconvened at 8:49 p.m. RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED) The Director of Public Works introduced Mr. Bob Brown from MN /DOT, and stated he was present this evening to explain the revised plan layout for I -694 to the Council. Mr. Brown briefly reviewed the past layout and explained why it is necessary to approve this revised layout plan. He noted that there are 110,000 cars per day on the river bridge. He went on to review the new plans of the revised layout. Councilmember Scott asked when construction would begin. Mr. Brown stated that there would be substructural work beginning in 1987 and that the actual construction work that would affect traffic would be in 1988 and 1989. Councilmember Theis asked if there were any plans for putting in a message board to help avoid morning traffic jams. Mr. Brown stated that there are plans for changeable message sign board to be installed. Councilmember Scott asked where the pedestrian bridge would be placed in connection to the freeway bridge. Mr. Brown stated that there has been some disagreements over the placement of the pedestrian bridge. He added that the pedestrian bridge is now planned'for being at grade. Councilmember Scott asked who would be responsible for the winter maintenance. Mr. Brown stated that MN /DOT will not plow the pedestrian bridge and that it would be up to the park district or the City. Mr. Brown stated that initially there had been 'talk of placing the pedestrian bridge lower than the freeway bridge. He added that the state patrol has urged MN /DOT to build the pedestrian bridge at grade level to avoid the enforcement and monitoring difficulties experienced with below grade pedestrian bridges. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -102 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAN LAYOUT FOR I -694 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and the motion passed. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 86018 SUBMITTED BY RICHARD WHITLEY REQUESTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE INTO TWO LOTS THE PARCEL OF LAND AT 5327 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH The City Manager noted this item was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its May 8, 1986 meeting. The Director of Planning & Inspection referred the Mayor and City Council to pages one and two of the May 8, 1986 Planning Commission minutes and the attached informational sheet with those minutes regarding this application. He reviewed the application and noted that by relocating the existing home to the south lot, it would allow for another single family home to be built on the northerl y lot. He noted the Plannin Commission recommended approval of Application No. 86018 subject to five conditions. After reviewing the conditions, the Director of Planning & Inspection stated that a public hearing is scheduled, notices have been sent, and a representative of the applicant is present at this evening's meeting. 6 -23 -86 -8- Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 86018 submitted by Richard Whitley requesting preliminary plat approval to subdivide into two lots the 'parcel of land at 5327 Bryant Avenue North. Mayor Nyquist inquired if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to speak at the public hearing. No one requested to speak and he entertained a motion to close the public hearing. There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to close the public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 86018 submitted by Richard Whitley. The motion passed. There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve Planning Commission Application No. 86018 submitted by Richard Whitley requesting preliminary plat approval to subdivide into two lots the parcel of land at 5327 Bryant Avenue North, subject to the following conditions 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final plat is subject to the 'provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 3. The applicant shall enter into a utility hookup agreement with the City prior to final plat approval. 4. The existing house shall be relocated and properly situated onto Lot 2, and the existing foundation removed prior to final plat approval. 5. No building permit shall be issued for Lot 1 until the plat receives final approval and is filed at the County. The motion passed. r There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve the final plat of the Whitley addition. The motion passed. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 86023 SUBMITTED BY BROOKLYN CENTER BAPTIST CHURCH REQUESTING SITE AND BUILDING PLAN AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A FELLOWSHIP HALL /GYMNASIUM ADDITION AT THE BROOKLYN CENTER BAPTIST CHURCH AT 5840 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH The City Manager'stated this item was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its May 22, 1986 meeting. The Director of Planning & Inspection referred the Council to pages one through four of the May 22, 1986 Planning Commission meeting minutes and the informational sheet attached with those minutes. He briefly reviewed the application and the 14 conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. He added that a public hearing is scheduled for this evening's meeting, notices have sent, and the applicant is present. 6 -23 -86 -9- Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Application No. 86023 submitted by Brooklyn Center Baptist Church requesting site and building plan and special use permit approval to construct a fellowship hall /gymnasium addition at the Brooklyn Center Baptist Church at 5840 Humboldt Avenue North. Mayor Nyquist inquired if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to speak at the public hearing. No one requested to speak and he entertained a motion to close the public hearing. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Theis to close the public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 86023 submitted by Brooklyn Center Baptist Church. The motion passed. There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve Planning Commission Application No. 86023 submitted by Brooklyn Center Baptist Church requesting site and building plan and special use permit approval to construct a fellowship hall /gymnasium addition at the Brooklyn Center Baptist Church at 5840 Humboldt Avenue North, subject to the following conditions: 1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits. 4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 5. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances if it is determined by the Building Official that fire sprinklering is required by the Building Code. 6. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 7. B612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 8. The applicant shall submit an as -built utility survey of the property prior to release of the performance guarantee. 6 -23 -86 -10- 9. Kitchen plans and equipment schedule are subject to review and approval by the City Sanitarian. 10. The special use permit standards are deemed to be met in this case on the following grounds a) the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. b) there is adequate space on the property to meet City ordinance requirements for parking. c) access is gained off neighborhood collector streets Humboldt Avenue North and 59th Avenue North. 11. No vehicular access to the site shall be allowed from the Girard Avenue North cul -de -sac to the south of the site. 12 The permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations. 13. The plans shall be modified to indicate permanent curbing and gutter around parking and driving areas. 14. The plans shall be modified to indicate infill of landscaping to provide thorough screening of the parking lot from adjacent residential properties The motion passed. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NOS 86017 86021 AND 86022 SUBMITTED BY TWIN CITY FEDERAL REQUESTING SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL TO BUILD A FOUR LANE DRIVE -UP FACILITY WITH CANOPY AT THE SAVINGS AND LOAN AT 2950 COUNTY ROAD 10• REQUESTING PRELIMINARY R.L.S. APPROVAL TO "RESUBDIVIDE THE TWIN CITY FEDERAL PROPERTY AND THE ST. PAUL BOOK AND STATIONERY PROPERTY: AND REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 35 -700 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW A GREENSTRIP AREA LESS THAN 15' IN WIDTH The City Manager stated that these items had been recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its May 22, 1986 meeting. The Director of Planning & Inspection stated that he would like to review each application individually but hold one public hearing. He added that the City Council would be required to approve each application individually. He went on to briefly review pages four through seven of the May 22, 1986 Planning Commission minutes and the informational sheet attached with those minutes. The Director of Planning & Inspection stated that Planning Commission Application No. 86021 was approved by the Planning Commission at its May 22, 6 -23 -86 -11- 1986 Planning Commission meeting, subject to three conditions which he reviewed for the Council. He went on to review the 12 conditions which the Planning Commission attached to Application No. 86017 pointing out that they had recommended requiring the building to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system. g He noted t g Y that this application was also recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at its May 22, 1986 meeting. The Director of Planning & Inspection then briefly reviewed the four conditions which the Planning Commission attached to Planning Commission Application No. 86022. He stated that a public hearing had been scheduled for Application Nos. 86021 and 86022, notices had been sent, and representatives of the applicant were present this evening. Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Planning Commission Application Nos. 86021 and 86022 submitted by Twin City Federal. Mayor Nyquist inquired if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to speak at the public hearing. No one requested to speak and he entertained a motion to close the public hearing. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to close the public hearing on Planning Commission Application Nos. 86021 and 86022 submitted by Twin City Federal. The motion passed. A brief discussion then ensued regarding the present traffic problem on Xerxes and the drive -up windows for Twin City Federal. Councilmember Lhotka inquired if there has been a police officer for the traffic problem in the past. The Director of Planning & Inspection stated that there has not been a police officer there in the past but the Planning Commission would like that condition added for future problems. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to approve Planning Commission Application No. 86021 submitted by Twin City Federal, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 3. The applicant shall execute an easement for sidewalk and utilities along the south side of the proposed Tract A prior to final R.L.S. approval. The motion passed. There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve Planning Commission Application No. 86022, subject to the following considerations and conditions: 1. The triangular configuration of the parcel creates real difficulties in meeting the minimum requirements of the ordinance. A hardship is recognized. 6 -23 -86 -12- 2. The circumstances were not created by the property owner but by the alignment of public streets. 3. The proposed site layout will function better than the existing layout and should not be detrimental to the neighborhood. 4. The site plans should be reviewed to indicate a minimum 10' greenstrip adjacent to the north access and southward until a fourth drive -up lane is achieved, thence widening to 25' along the north side of the south exit drive. The motion passed. There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve Planning Commission Application No.86017 submitted by Twin City Federal, subject to the following conditions: 1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site erformance agreement greement .and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted P rior to the issuance of permits. 4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 5. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances 6. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 8. B612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 6 -23 -86 -13- 9. The applicant shall submit an as -built utility survey of the property prior to release of the performance guarantee. 10. The plans shall be modified prior to review by the City Council to indicate the following: a) the landscape plan shall indicate additional plantings to meet the requirement of 109 points for the site overall and shall contain a landscape schedule. b) the plans shall indicate that the building and canopy are to be fire sprinklered in accordance with NFPA standards. c) the site plans shall be modified to indicate a minimum 10 greenstrip off the north access to the site. 11. The new R.L.S. for the property shall be given final approval by the City Council and be filed at the county prior to the issuance of permits. 12. If traffic congestion does occur in Xerxes Avenue North as a result of the bank drive -up traffic, the applicant shall provide on- street traffic control at their expense. The motion passed. DISCUSSION ITEMS WITHDRAWAL FROM SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY The City Manager stated that he would like the Council to confirm the action taken regarding the withdrawal from Suburban Rate Authority. He stated that the deadline for withdrawal was dune 15, and that the City would still be involved with the Suburban Rate Authority until December 31, 1986. He added that the Council had suggested withdrawal in the 1986 budget planning process. Councilmember Lhotka stated that he feels the benefits from the Suburban Rate Authority seem to go to the law firm which handles the Suburban Rate Authority and that Brooklyn Center's benefits are minimal. The City Manager stated that he would like a motion confirming his action. There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis confirming the withdrawal from Suburban Rate Authority. The motion passed. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ULTIMAPS SYSTEM BY LOGIS The City Manager explained that during the 1986 budget process the City Council had put a hold on the funds for the ULTIMAP system. He stated that Mr. Ted Willard was present this evening to explain the ULTIMAP system and its uses within the City. Mr. Willard stated that this would be a pilot project in order i 6 -23 -86 -14- .4 to evaluate the effectiveness of the ULTIMAP system in ',a suburban area. He stated the cities would be using practical applications for the system to determine its effectiveness. Mr. Willard went on to explain the different areas in which the ULTIMAP system could be used, such as Planning, Assessing, and Public Works. The Director of Public Works briefly reviewed the cost analysis reports prepared for this item. Councilmember Lhotka noted that it appears that the costs in this report are for the Public Works area and inquired what the cost for the other departments would be. The City Manager stated that some of the other departments, such as Assessing are on the LOGIS system already, and that the Apollo system would simply express their data on a map. Councilmember Theis stated that he likes the concept of the ULTIMAP system and he is convinced its a super system but he is not sure about the cost analysis. He stated he would like some additional backup information on these reports. Councilmember Lhotka asked if the total cost for 1986 would be $30,000. The City Manager responded affirmatively. There was a motion by Councilmember Scott to release the funds appropriated for the ULTIMAP system. The motion died for a lack of a second. There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to table the resolution releasing the funds pending clarification and analysis of the personnel costs. The motion passed. APPROVAL OF AN ON -SALE NONINTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE FOR PIZZA HUT There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve an On -Sale Nonintoxicating Liquor License for Pizza Hut. The motion passed. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 11:40 p.m. City Clerk Mayor 6 -23 -86 -15- CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF B:R1000KLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 , C ENTER EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE = 911 TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer DATE: July 10, 1986 RE: Final R.L.S. Twin City Federal Property Twin City Federal, developer of the above referenced R.L.S., has petitioned the City Council to approve the final R.L.S. which resubdivides -the Twin City Federal property and the St. Paul Book and Stationary property in such a way as to transfer a .06 acre wedge of land from the St. Paul Book and Stationary parcel to the Twin City Federal parcel. The land in this R.L.S. is bounded by Northway Drive on the North, by the old European Health Spa access drive and building site on the East, by County Road 10 on the South and by Xerxes Avenue North on the West. Conditions placed on the preliminary R.L.S. by City Council at its June 23rd, 1986 meeting are as follows: 1. The final R.L.S. is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The final R.L.S. is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 3. The applicant shall execute an easement for sidewalk and utilities along the South side of the proposed Tract A prior to final R.L.S. approval. Conditions 1 and 2 have been met. Accordingly, we recommend approval of the final R.L.S. subject to the following conditions: 1. Receipt of title opinion from the City Attorney certifying the appropriate parties responsible for signing the R.L.S. 2 The applicant shall execute an approved easement for sidewalk and utilities along the South side of proposed Tract A prior to final R.L.S.. approval. Resp tfully submitted, Approved for submittal, r .R rrier Sy nap City E 'neer Director of Public Works HRS: jn DEAN A. NYQUIST CITY HA,-_ ; Mayor CITY 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Res: 533 -0774 BROOKLYN Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Bus: 533 -7272 Telephone 612/561 -5440 CENTER OFFICE OF THE MAYOR July 1, 1986 Mr. Brad Hoffman Brooklyn Center City Hall 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Dear Brad, I talked e with Barb Jensen and she is willing to serve on the Urban Hennepin in Count Community Development Block Grant P Y Y P Program Citizen Participation Plan. I suggest that we submit her name at the next council meeting. Sincerely, Dean A. Nyquist DAN /lb cc: Patty Page (NOT PRINTED AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE) CA Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FOR SEALCOATING OF STREETS (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -12, CONTRACT 1986 -J) WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project No. 1986 -12, bids were received, opened, and tabulated by the City Clerk and Engineer, on the 14th day of July, 1986. Said bids were as follows: Bidder Bid Amount Allied Blacktop $100,271,.03 Buffalo Bituminous $112,018.64 WHEREAS, it appears the Allied Blacktop of Maple Grove Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota: 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract, in the amount of $100,271.03 with Allied Blacktop of Maple Grove, Minnesota in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project No. 1986 -12 according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that: 1. The estimated cost of Improvement Project No. 1986 -12 is hereby amended according to the following schedule: As Approved As Bid Contract 114 750.00 $ $100,.271,03 Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk RESOLUTION NO. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FOR SEALCOATING OF STREETS (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -12,` CONTRACT 1986 -J) WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project No. 1986 -12, bids were received, opened, and tabulated by the City Clerk and Engineer, on the 14th day of July, 1986. Said bids were as follows: Bidder Bid Amount WHEREAS, it appears the of , Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota: 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract, in the amount of $ with of Minnesota in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project No. 1986 -12 accordin g P P to the plans and specifications therefor approved b the City Council and on file in the office of the City PP y y Y Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that: 1. The estimated cost of Improvement Project No. 1986 -12 is hereby amended according to the following schedule: As Approved As Bid Contract Engineering Administration RESOLUTION NO. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF B ROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 r TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTER EMERGENCY- POLICE -FIRE 911 TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works DATE: July 11, 1986 RE: Report to Council Regarding Bids Opened for Contract 1986 -J Bids for the Sealcoat Improvement Project No. 1986 -12, Contract 1986 -J will be Opened at 11:00 A.M. on July 14th. Due to the Thursday deadline for agenda items it is impossible to submit a bid tabulation and recommendation with the regular Council agenda mailing. Accordingly, an analysis of bids and resolution will be available to Councilmembers shortly before Monday's Council meeting. SK: jn q Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT, ACCEPTING CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT, CALLING FOR A HEARING THEREON AND APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -10, 69TH AND 70TH AVENUES NORTH DUPONT AVENUE TO T.H. 252 (CONTRACT 1986 -M) WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported to the City Council that it is necessary and in the best interests of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota to construct street improvements on 69th and 70th Avenues between Dupont Avenue and T.H. 252; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared specifications for the proposed work; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has estimated the cost of said improvement to be $365,109.10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The following project is hereby established: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -10 2. The City Engineer's Report is hereby accepted. 3. The Council will consider Improvement Project No. 1986 -10 in accordance with the Engineer's Report and the assessment of benefiting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $365,109.10. 4. The area to be included within the Assessment District for Improvement Project No. 1986 -10 shall be property abutting 69th and 70th Avenues North between Dupont Avenue and T.H. 252. 5. A public hearing shall be held on the proposed improvement on the 11th day of August, 1986, in the Council_ Chambers of the City Hall at 8:00 P.M. local time, and the Clerk shall give mailed and " published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. 6. The specifications for Contract 1986 -M for said improvement project prepared by the City Engineer are hereby approved and ordered filed with the City Clerk. RESOLUTION N0. 7. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least twice in the official newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date for receipt of bids, and specify the work to be done, state that said bids will be received by the City Clerk until 11:30 A.M. on August 7th, 1986, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers at City Hall by the City Clerk and City Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be considered by the City Council, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for 5 percent of the amount of such bid. 8. The accounting for Project No. 1986 -10 will be done in the Municipal State Aid Street Fund 2613 Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF B ROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTER EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 TO Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer DATE: July 11, 1986 RE: 69th and 70th Avenue North - Dupont Avenue North to T.H. 252 Project No. 1986 -10, Contract 1986 -M Attached is the Engineer's Report for the above referenced project. I have also attached a copy of a resolution which: 1. establishes Street Improvement Project No. 1986 -10; 2. accepts the Engineer's Report; 3. approves plans and specifications for the improvement; 4. calls for a hearing on the improvement project. Details of the project are contained in the Engineer's Report. The public hearing is proposed for August 11, 1986. The action requested is the adoption of the attached resolution. Re e tfully submitted, AWnapp ed for submittal, Sp ier S ity En neer Director of Public Works HRS : j n now CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF B ROOKL YN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 ENTER TELEPHONE 561 -5440 El C E NT E R EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 ENGINEERING REPORT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -10 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Street Improvement Project No. 1986 -10 includes intersection realignment, sidewalk and bikeway construction, subgrade preparation, installation of concrete curb and gutter, and bituminous paving. PROJECT LOCATION The street improvement consists of the connection of 69th Avenue North to 70th Avenue North between Dupont Avenue North and T.H. 252, INTRODUCTION The street improvement project referenced above for 69th Avenue and 70th Avenue North is Phase II work and completes a project initiated in 1982 as a result of recommendations made in the "Evergreen Area Improvement Concept B ". DISCUSSION The "Evergreen Area Improvement Concept B" recommended the construction of an East -West collector route in the neighborhood following 70th Avenue between T.H. 252 and Camden Avenue then following a curvilinear route south to the alignment of 69th Avenue near Colfax Avenue. The westerly terminus of this proposed project is at 69th Avenue and Dupont Avenue. A major part of the rough grading and part of the bituminous paving for this collector street was accomplished by the Phase I project, Street Improvement Project No. 1982 -09. Map 1 identifies property abutting this improvement which was benefitted by and assessed for pavement as a part of that improvement. Phase II of the collector street construction benefits the district shown on Map 2. Some property not abutting the 1982 project has been assessed for pavement, but none of the abutting property has been assessed for curb and gutter. ..�lri .$o NwG ill mrc (� •• Engineer's Report Project No. 1986 -10 Page 2 It was anticipated in 1982 that the assessment and the Phase II work on this collector be done in conjunction with the construction of T.H. 252. The work on 70th Avenue East of Camden is now definitely scheduled for the late summer and fall of 1986. In accordance with that original plan we are now recommending the Phase II construction of the collector street. It is recommended that the City of Brooklyn Center proceed with a contract for improvement of the segment between Dupont Avenue and Camden Avenue . MNDOT has contracted for the segment between Camden Avenue and T.H. 252, with partial reimbursement for the costs by the City under a Cooperative Agreement with MNDOT. The proposed collector street between Dupont Avenue and Camden Avenue will be 32 feet wide and have B -618 curb and gutter in accordance with Municipal State Aid Standards. A detail of the proposed roadway section is included in the Appendix. The proposed collector street between Camden Avenue and T.H. 252 will taper out to 4 lanes at the intersection with T.H. 252. A detail of the intersection is in the appendix. Other work anticipated includes minor storm sewer realignment in order to control surface drainage problems in the vicinity of Colfax and Bryant Avenues along 69th Avenue North. A sidewalk and bicycle path will be constructed adjacent to the proposed facilities between T.H. 252 and Dupont Avenue. These facilities will be integrated with existing facilities serving Evergreen Park and Evergreen School. The plan provides for construction of both a sidewalk and a bikeway along the northerly side of the roadway for the entire project length - from Dupont Avenue to T.H. 252. In addition, a new sidewalk -will be constructed on the southerly side from Dupont Avenue to the proposed pedestrian crosswalk which leads to the easterly entrance to Evergreen School. The routing for this sidewalk and the location of the pedestrian crossing have been coordinated with the Principal of the Evergreen School. FUNDING The collector street on 69th and 70th Avenue between Dupont Avenue and T.H. 252 is on the City's Municipal State Aid system and, as such, is eligible for funding from the Regular Municipal State Aid Account. Engineer's Report Project No. 1986 -10 Page 3 A summary of the project cost is detailed below: 69th & 70th 70th Avenue Dupont to Camden Camden to TH 252 No. 1986 -10 No. 1986 -17 Item City Project MNDOT Project Total Total Construction Costs $255,328.50 $ 57,999.17 $307,327.67 Contingency (10 %) 25.531.50 0.00 25.531.50 Subtotal $280,860.00 $ 51,999.17 $332,859.17 Engineering (8 %) $ 22,470.00 $ 4,159.93 $ 26,629.93 Administration (1 %) 2,810.00 0.00 2,810.00 Legal (1 %) 2.810.00 0.00 2.810.00 Total Project Cost $308,950.00 $ 56,159.10 $365,109.10 The Phase II Improvement District shown on Map 2 has the three assessment zones described below: Zone 1 Reconstruction Zone - Property assessed for reconstruction in accordance with Resolution No. 86 -17, which establishes street reconstruction rates for 1986. Zone 2 Curb and Gutter Construction Zone - Property previously assessed for Phase I pavement but not assessed for curb and gutter: Zone 3 Curb and Gutter and Pavement Construction Zone - Property outside Phase I not previously assessed for curb and gutter or pavement. The assessment rate for property in Zone 1 has been established by Resolution No. 86 -17 and will be $1,300.00 per single - family site. The assessment rate for Zone 2 is established by adjusting the 1982 rate for new curb and gutter. The 1982 rate was $11.00 per front foot. The Twin Cities Consumer Price Index has increase 12.2 %. The 1986 rate is therefor $12.34 per front foot for new curb and gutter construction. The assessment rate for Zone 3 is established by adjusting the 1982 rate for complete street construction. The 1982 rate was $21.40 per front foot, increased by 12.2% the rate will be $24.00 per front foot. Engineer's Report Project No. 1986 -10 Page 4 Proposed assessments are tabulated in the Appendix. A summary of the total assessments are listed by Zone below: Private City Total Special Special Special Area Assessments Assessments Assessments Zone 1 $ 5,200.00 $ 0.00 $ 5,200.00 Zone 2 8,566.55 11,784.58 20,351.13 Zone 3 8.431.44 26,219.04 34.650.48 Totals $22,197.99 $38,003.62 $60,201.61 In accordance with Cooperative Agreement No. 63405, MNDOT will pay part of the cost of 70th Avenue between Camden and T.H. 252. The balance of that cost and the remainder of the collector street is eligible for Regular Municipal State Aid. The projected revenue from all sources is summarized below: REVENUE SUMMARY 0 Special Assessments Private $ 22,197.99 City 38,003.62 MNDOT Contributions 51,375.18 Regular Municipal State Aid 308.113.92 Subtotal Revenue $419,690.71 Local MSA Credit ( 54.581.61) TOTAL REVENUE $365,109.10 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The improvements as described above are feasible under the conditions outlined and at the cost estimated. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution establishing the project, accepting City Engineer's Report, calling for a hearing and approving plans and specifications for this improvement, Project No. 1986 -10, Contract 1986 -M. I horehy corti tliat this plan, specification, or report p;apared icy me or under my direct supervislon and that 1 am a duly Registered Professional ";gineer Ader the v of the State of %minnesom. DEde ( Registration No. 13039 3 R-- -------- - vV:a1 i w _ WOODBINE LANE r _ - -- -- E N. ZI Vv" EVERGREEN X - -- ; H R3 PARK � ♦� `� � '�• PAR ". r w EVERGREEN w w SCHOOL x X } \xk r - ASSESSMENT in - -- # DISTRI �a _ EMERSON �A . wa7ER ; ,.— - 7 i -� - A.H. TOwEP NO. I - - - z 4 -- e7 Project Location And Assessment District Map Improvemet. Projec . � ct 1.:982. - 09 ITAP 1, PHASE I ASSESSIENT DISTRICT � - •+ ��! I • Iw r,,.•,,...r a .� 41. ` .w ; E' E O I" !`J' P A R #4 /'� � .p 0 r"'"`- cli r t r i )RI '. AV 70 j7�- 3 51.3 1 / 300.00...1 S'r•�.... ..; .. •,�I + �` 7 0.07 If P I1 Z NE 2 co ( �1�� •, ,s'�IG'i{ ' ?A' <A �'�C rti� •�ca +.;:a�s , � ��t {1�� it t�lj . SY.I to . I . ' •: 4 UNITS ..,„ _.._....� zf Jck 1Y Wq - 1' • NE i. , ' I ,. '•?'w7"a r? V i `� �....,.�t Yn �'• )s.aa ` -0 j ... "�$1�. __- -- . �'•A h(j .� f. f Y.�, �y ' MAP 2, PHASE II ASSESSAIENT DISTRICT . •t r • t 6 ' r h < t q ., LE � } d s .t '.�• , f r r.: y ,• crc i, ZONE 1 r.....�.r r• rry ' . ' ' ... � « , !� %r , t f � , ; ; ,� ,,,, ZONE 2 .r , w.. 1 i '' :i ':,� %• Z�r G :v; L+ Rp 't LONE } �� •�•iI��M ,i '', ;., � < <,�,q FRONT FOOTAGE •6 2 3 0 ` ,� l e i ; }fin wo DETAIL 1 TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS 69TH AND 70TH AVENUES NORTH is tN tts to I" A v[ .CONN• - ATA. Y468 tO AfA.14434.A STA.14464-6 TO 004 ♦3 0 R w R 3S' 39' Ptloftl •' 300 6 4 "- 6 -610 CONC. GRAD TOPSOIL 0.03 %iT� C'66' 0 Yf 00[• /ft 00 / 3 x __ 1.0' t x 1 N tM SECTION T '1" PLANT- MIXEOWEARING COURSEISPEC23611 1' PLANT- MIXEOWEARING COURSE(SPEC23611 14/2"PLANT MIXEO WEARING COURSE (SPEC23411MODIFIED 1-V2 "PLANT -MIXED BINDER COURSEISPEC.23311 * "PLANT -MIXED BIND COURSE (SPEC.233 Z "PLANT -MIXED BINDER COURSEISPEC.2331) 4 "AGGREGATE lIASEICLASS S1 EXISTING leSUSCUT PON COMPACTION !3" AGGREGATE BASE ICLAlS SI '"�'• 1 : "ItUBCUt ROR COMPACTION � _tYP.1CAL SECT ION 160 TH TO TOTH .CONN.1 • CIty STREET 13.0' 1560' e" 4' R011EO CURB i 4 ROLLED CURB 1 a'iFt, ,.O�yFT, _aaYf T . t TUM. Sun,.- SPE l' 4 CL.S GRAVEL BASE SPEC.2202 SUBGRAOE SPEC.¢Ilt r DETAIL 2: MNDOT CONSTRUCTED.- CITY_,PROJECT MO 1986 -17 70TH AVENUE NORTH == T 1'N't . 252 TO CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH Iced. pro No, e•n•��' :i.T• e. a•, .. L • 102.01' L • 35o.tf ' t NORTH g ; ecALt M Fitt �i�i1>�t Lod At " � � . • 160,000 • - 5+E0.> ,S'SiKEWAr I V WALK j WALK END 6.A.K Kn - -0 31 DION 8824 �- 3 �... �•.:.•. - tt'� "MUSES k* I s FORNTE I C I� ALK DETAK.at AAA. M - 1!s•e PIXIlt WALL OWN 11"IfINd axis Co i • MATC 861 11JCi,oi0 1 ' t -$ -on Arf.. ' '' ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -10 69TH AND 70TH AVENUE Item 1986 -10 # Contract Item Unit Unit Price Quantity Cost 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 5,000.00 0.80 $4,000.00 2101.502 CLEARING EACH 100.00 9 900.00 2101.507 GRUBBING EACH 50.00 9 450.00 2104.501 REMOVE CONCR C & G (ALL DSGNS) LF 2.75 50 137.50 2104.505 REMOVE CONCR PAVEMENT (6" & 8" SY 7.25 70 507.50 2104.505 REMOVE BIT PVMT (ALL DEPTHS) SY 2.50 4,400 11,000.00 2104.509 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 250.00 2 500.00 2104.511 SAWCUT CONCR PVMT (4 ", 6 ", 8 ") LF 6.00 45 270.00 2104.611 SAWCUT CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER EACH 10.00 4 40.00 2104.513 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 2.50 300 750.00 2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 125.00 10 1,250.00 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 6.00 2,293 13,758.00 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON 8.75 1,770 15,487.50 2331.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIX TON 200.00 35 7,000.00 2331.510 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE TON 20.00 542 10,840.00 2341.521 BITUMINOUS 8 PEDESTRIAN TRAIL LF 8.00 1,680 13,440 00 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK GAL 1.50 2,350 '3,525.00 2361.504 ASPHALT CEMENT TON 200.00 72 14,400.00 2361.508 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 22.00 560 12,320.00 2503.511 12" R.C. PIPE SEWER, CLASS 5 LF 35.00 292 10,220.00 2503.511 12" R.C. PIPE SEWER (PERF) IF 45.00 110 4,950.00 2503.511 12" R.C. FLARED END EACH 250.00 1 250.00 2503.511 15" R.C. PIPE SEWER, CLASS 5 LF 30.00 160 4,800.00 2506.509 CONSTRUCT C.B. ON EXIST 15" EACH 1,350.00 2 2,700.00 2506.509 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN EACH 1,000.00 11 11,000.00 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY (ALL DESIGNS)EACH 275.00 9 2,475.00 2506.521 INSTALL CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 75.00 19 1,425.00 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 175.00 2 350.00 0506.611 CUT INTO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 500.00 3 1,500.00 0506.622 ADJUST WATER VALVE BOX EACH 75.00 2 150.00 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK (HI EARLY) SF 2.00 18,000 36,000.00 2531.501 CONCRETE C & G (DESIGN B -612) IF 8.00 50 400.00 2531.501 CONCRETE C & G (DESIGN B -618) LF 6.50 3,952 25,688.00 2571.502 FURNISH & PLANT SHADE TREE EACH 200.00 18 3,600.00 2571.541 TRANSPLANT TREE (DECIDUOUS) EACH 200.00 1 200.00 2571.544 TRANSPLANT SHRUB (POTENTILLA) EACH 25.00 18 450.00 0563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 2,000.00 1 2,000.00 2575.505 SODDING WITH 4" TOPSOIL SY 3.25 11,200 36,400.00 3882.501 6" WOOD"CHIP MULCH (TYPE 6) SY 3.00 65 195.00 - -- - - - -- TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $255,328.50 CONTINGENCY (10 %) 25,531.50 - - - - -- SUBTOTAL $280,860.00 ENGINEERING (8 %) 22,470.00 ADMINISTRATION (1%) 2,810.00 LEGAL (1 %) 2,810.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $308,950.00 Item No. Work Item Unit Unit 70th Ave 109 - 125 -01 Price Quantity Cost 2101.501 Clearing Acre 1,025.00 0.64 656.00 2101.502 Clearing Tree 21.00 3.00 63.00 2101.506 Grubbing Acre 1,030.00 0.64 659.20 2101.507 Grubbing Tree 22.00 3.00 66.00 2104.501 Remove St Sewer Pipe LF 3.50 11.00 38.50 2104.505 Remove Bit Pavement SY 0.85 1,400.00 1,190.00 2104.509 Remove MH or CB Each 125.00 1.00 125.00 2104.513 Saw Bit Pavement LF 1.80 85.00 153.00 2104.523 Salvage Castings Each 50.00 1.00 50.00 2105.501 Common Excavation CY 1.65 1,134.00 1,871.10 2105.507 Subgrade Excavation CY 1.65 618.00 1,019.70 2105.523 Common Borrow (IV) CY 2.65 885.00 2,345.25 2105.525 Topsoil Borrow (IV) CY 5.25 399.00 2,094.75 2105.543 Stabil Aggregate Ton 5.60 325.00 1,820.00 2130.501 Water M Gal 20.00 1,00 20.00 2211.501 Aggregate Base CL 5 Ton 5.21 44.00 229.24 2331.504 Bit Mat for Mix Ton 150.00 32.00 4,800.00 2331.510 Bind Course Mix MOD Ton 8.98 224.00 2,011.52 2331.514 Base Course Mix MOD Ton 8.75 449.00 3,928.75 2341.504 Bit Material for Mix Ton 150.00 16.00 2,400.00 2341.508 Wear Course Mix MOD Ton 9.48 260.00 2,464.80 2357.502 Bit Mat for Tack Gallon 1.05- 329.00 345.45 2503.511 12" RC Pipe Cl 5 LF 15.04 65.00 977.60 2506.507 Const CB DES A/F LF 125.00 11.90 1,487.50 2506.507 Const CB DES C/G LF 125.00 24.00 3,000.00 2506.516 Casting Assemblies Each 180.00 5.00 900.00 2506.522 Adj Fr & Ring Cast Each 150.00 4.00 600.00 2521.501 4" Concrete Walk SF 1.73 2,891.00 5,001.43 2531.501 Conc C & G DES B618 LF 5.16 168.00 866.88 2531.501 Conc C & G DES B624 LF 5.44 1,165.00 6,337.60 2531.503 Concrete Median SY _13.83 51.00 705.33 2531.507 8" Conc Drive Pvmt SY 20.10 17.00 341.70 2575.505 Sodding SY 1.02 1,946.00 1,984.92 0504.602 Adj Water GV Box Each 75.00 2.00 150.00 Subtotal 50,704.22 Prorata Items (2.55393 %) 1,294.95 Total $51,999.17 70TH AVENUE 109- 125 -01 State City Construction Cost 48,879.22 3,119.95 51,999.17 Construction Engineering (8%)* 2,495.96 1,663.97 4,159.93 TOTAL COST $51,375.18 $4,783.92 $56,159.10 *Construction Engineering is shared 60% MNDOT 40% City Member Bill Hawes introduced the following resolution and fe moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 86 -17 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ASSESSMENT RATES FOR STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS DURING 1986 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center that, pursuant to Resolution No. 85 -34, adopted on February 11, 1985, the following assessment rates are hereby established for street reconstruction projects (consisting of the installation of concrete curb and gutter and related street paving improvements) in residentially -zoned areas, where such projects are placed under contract for construction in 1986: 1. for residential properties, zoned or used as single - family sites, which are not subdividable under the City's Subdivision Ordinance, the unit rate of assessment shall be $1,300.00. 2. for properties in R -2 zoned districts, which are no used as single- family sites, the equivalent rate shall be $17.33 per front foot, with a minimum assessment of $1,300.00. 3. for properties in R -3 zoned districts the assessment rate per residential unit shall be established by the following formula: Assessable frontage x S17.33 Number of residential units 4. the assessment rates in R -4, R -5 R -6, and R -7 zoned districts shall be individually established based on an evaluation of project costs and project benefits. January 27, 1986 Date Mayor A TTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, 'and Rich Theis: and the following voted against the same: Gene Lhotka, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON 69TH AND 70TH .AVENUE NORTH BETWEEN CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH AND DUPONT AVENUE" NORTH WHEREAS, the City has prepared plans for the construction and reconstruction of 69th Avenue North and 70th Avenue North between Camden Avenue North and Dupont Avenue North utilizing Municipal State Aid funds (M.S.A.P. 109- 125 -02) and WHEREAS, said plans specify reconstruction of said segments to widths that Municipal State Aid Rules require total prohibition of parking on each of said segments: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that, effective upon completion of the above specified segment: 1. "No Parking Anytime" regulations are hereby approved and posted on both sides of 69th Avenue North and 70th Avenue North between Camden Avenue North and Dupont Avenue North. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF : BROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 [� TELEPHONE 561.5440 C ENTE R EMERGENCY — POLICE - FIRE 911 TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer DATE: July 11, 1986 RE: Parking Restrictions on 69th and 70th Avenue North Dupont Avenue North to Camden Avenue North The attached resolution establishes parking restrictions on 69th and 70th Avenue between Dupont Avenue and Camden Avenue. The restrictions are required in order to conform to Municipal State Aid rules. It is therefore recommended that the attached resolution be adopted. Res full submitted, A c fu ro d for submittal , PP r S trier Sy nape ity En 'neer Director of Public Works HRS : j n "7lce Soketicirg 7Zane �„ Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PROJECT, ACCEPTING CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT AND APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR HUMBOLDT SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 1986 -06 (CONTRACT 1986 -N) WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported to the City Council that it is necessary and in the best interests of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota to construct sidewalk along Humboldt Avenue from 69th to 71st and 72nd to Woodbine Lane; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared specifications for the proposed work; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has estimated the cost of said improvement to be $30,360.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The City Engineer's Report is hereby accepted. 2. The following project is hereby established: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -06 3. The specifications for Contract 1986 -N for said improvement project prepared by the City Engineer are hereby approved and ordered filed with the City Clerk. 4. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least twice in the official newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date for receipt of bids, and specify the work to be done, state that said bids will be received by the City Clerk until 11:00 A.M. on August 7th,- 1986, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers at City Hall by the City Clerk and City Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be considered by the City Council in the Council Chambers, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for 5 percent of the amount of such bid. 5. The accounting for Project No. 1986 -06 will be done in the Fund. RESOLUTION N0. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF ROOKLYN _BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTER EMERGENCY- POLICE - FIRE 911 TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works FROM: H.R. Spurrier, City Engineer DATE: July 11, 1986 RE: Sidewalk Improvement Project No. 1986 -06 Humboldt Avenue Sidewalk Attached is the Engineer's Report for the above referenced project and a resolution which establishes the project, accepts the Engineer's Report and approves plans and specifications for the improvement. The report discusses the details of this project and concludes that the project is feasible. It is my recommendation that the attached resolution be approved. Res e t lly submitted, Approv for submittal, H. rr er Sy K _PP City Engine Director of Public Works HRS : j n CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY OF B ROOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 r TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTER EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 ENGINEERING REPORT SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -06 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sidewalk Improvement Project No. 1986 -06 includes grading and construction of sidewalk. PROJECT LOCATION The sidewalk improvement consists of sidewalk construction between 69th and 72nd Avenues North along Humboldt Avenue North. INTRODUCTION This sidewalk improvement project on Humboldt Avenue North was the result of an appearance by area residents at the City Council meeting August 23rd, 1985. DISCUSSION In August, 1985 the City received requests for the installation of sidewalks along the West side of Humboldt Avenue. One request asked for sidewalk between 70th and 71st Avenues, and another request asked for installation of sidewalk_ between 72nd Avenue and Woodbine Lane. On October 9th, 1985 City staff held a "Neighborhood Meeting" with residents along Humboldt Avenue to discuss numerous issues including the requests for sidewalk installation. After hearing both support and objection, the City Manager stated that a study would be conducted to determine whether sidewalk would be utilized in this area. The results of this study were presented to City Council as a Discussion Item at the January 13th, 1986 council meeting. City Council expressed a favorable_ concensus for constructing the sidewalk. Following the Council meeting, a survey was prepared to get comments from the 12 property owners along Humboldt. Five property owners returned the survey. Four supported the proposed sidewalk and the fifth agreed to "go with themajority ". Staff initial analysis determined that the work was best completed in conjunction with the construction of the collector street along 69th and 70th Avenue. That project was coordinated with T.H. 252 construction and would not be completed prior to school opening. We want the work completed prior to September, 1986 and so it was necessary to make this a separate project. Engineer's Report Project No. 1986 -06 Page 2 FUNDING Sidewalk along Humboldt Avenue cannot be funded by the Regular Municipal State Aid Account because permanent improvements to Humboldt Avenue are not being made with this project. In accordance with current City policy, this sidewalk would be funded by the Local Municipal State Aid Account. Project costs and funding is summarized below: Humboldt Avenue Sidewalk Project No. 1986 -06 Item Local MSA Total Construction Costs $ 25,079.50 Contingency (10 %) 2.510.50 Subtotal $ 27,500.00 Engineering (8%) $ 2,210.00 Administration (1 %) 280.00 Legal 1 1 � 2 g { ) 80.00 Total Project Cost $ 30,360.00 Sufficient funds are available in the Local Municipal State Aid Accounts to fund the sidewalk on Humboldt. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The improvements as described above are feasible under the conditions outlined and at the cost estimated. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution establishing the project, accepting City Engineer's Report and approving plans and specifications for this Improvement Project No. 1986 -06, Contract 1986 -N. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and thdu Registered Professional Engin la s f the State of Minnesota. i bate istraticn No. 13689 ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1986 -06 HUMBOLDT AVENUE SIDEWALK Item 1986 -06 # Contract Item Unit Unit Price Quantity Cost 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 5,000.00 0.20 $1,000.00 2101.502 CLEARING EACH 100.00 3 300.00 2101.507 GRUBBING EACH 50.00 3 150.00 2104.501 REMOVE CONCR C & G (ALL DSGNS) LF 2.75 40 110.00 2104.505 REMOVE CONCR PAVEMENT (6 & 8" SY 7.25 12 87.00 2104.505 REMOVE BIT PVMT (ALL DEPTHS) SY 2.50 65 162.50 2104.511 SAWCUT CONCR PVMT (4 ", 6 ", 8") LF 6.00 140 840.00 2104.513 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 2.50 224 560.00 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 6.00 200 1,200.00 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK GAL 1.50 60 90.00 2361.504 ASPHALT CEMENT TON 200.00 1 200.00 2361.508 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 22.00 15 330.00 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK (HI EARLY) SF 2.00 7,800 15,600.00 2571.502 FURNISH & PLANT SHADE TREE EACH 200.00 6 1,200.00, 2575.505 SODDING WITH 4" TOPSOIL SY 3.25 1,000 3,250.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $25,079.50 CONTINGENCY 10% 2,510.50 SUBTOTAL $27,590.00 ENGINEERING (8%) 2,210.00 ADMINISTRATION (1%) 280.00 LEGAL (1%) 280.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $30,360.00 TO: Property Owners Along West Side of Humboldt Avenue North - Between 69th Avenue North and 71st Avenue North; and Between 72nd Avenue North and Woodbine Lane FROM: - Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works DATE: January 21, 1986 RE: Requests for Installation of Sidewalks on West Side of Humboldt Avenue North In late August, 1985 two requests were submitted to the City for the installation of sidewalk along the West side of Humboldt Avenue (see map attached). One request asked for installation of sidewalk between 70th and 71st Avenues (Note: This request for sidewalk was included in a list of other requests relating to traffic and pedestrian problems on Humboldt Avenue between 69th and 73rd Avenues.) - The second request asked for installation of sidewalk between 72nd Avenue and Woodbine Lane. On October 9, 1985 City staff held a "Neighborhood Meeting" with residents along Humboldt Avenue to discuss numerous issues, including the requests for sidewalk installation. At that meeting, several people supported the proposed sidewalk extensions. However, some abutting property owners also objected to the proposed extensions. The City Manager stated that a study would be conducted to determine the number of students who would utilize sidewalks in these areas, and the City staff would then make its recommendations to the City Council. On Tuesday, October 22, 1985 the Engineering staff conducted counts, of the number of pedestrians who walk along the boulevards on four segments of Humboldt' Avenue where no sidewalk currently exists. Copies of the detailed counts are attached, and are summarized as follows: Total Number of Pedestrians Location Counted in 12 -Hour Period West side of Humboldt between 69th and 70th Avenues 11 West side of Humboldt between 70th and 71st Avenues 29 January 21, 1986 Page 2 Total Number of Pedestrians Location Counted in 12 -Hour Period Woodbine Avenue between Humboldt and Knox Avenues 17 Note: It is assumed that these pedestrians would use a sidewalk on the West side of Humboldt Avenue between 72nd Avenue and Woodbine Lane, if such a sidewalk were installed. West side of Humboldt Avenue between Woodbine Lane and 73rd Avenue 5 * Note: This count represents only those who walked on the grass boulevard or along the side of the roadway, with existing conditions. Based on this information, the Administrative Traffic Committee (which consists of the City Manager, the Chief of Police and the Director of Public Works y g , ) recommended that sidewalks be installed on the West side of Humboldt Avenue from 69th to 71st Avenues and from 72nd Avenue to Woodbine Lane. That recommendation was submitted to the City Council on January 13, 1986. Following discussion of the recommendation, the City Council expressed support for the proposal, and directed staff to individually contact each property owner along these segments to request your individual comments. Accordingly, the purpose of this letter is to solicit your input relating to this proposal. The following information is provided to assist you in evaluating the effects of this proposal: If these sidewalks are installed, they would be installed within the existing right -of -way for Humboldt Avenue, approximately one foot from the right -of -way line. (Note: This would be an extension of the alignment for those sidewalks which are now inplace between 71st and 72nd Avenues.) However, to allow the sidewalk grades to be blended properly to existing driveways, front yards, etc., we would probably request some property owners to provide "slope easements ". If slope easements cannot be obtained, some areas may require construction of retaining walls as an alternative. ' If the sidewalks are installed, the entire costs would be paid from the City's Municipal State Aid Street fund. No portion of these costs would be levied as special assessments to abutting property owners. Also, if the sidewalks are installed, the City will be responsible for operation and maintenance costs - including snowplowing and future repair costs. Enclosed is a questionaire which you may use in advising us of your comments regarding this proposal. Please complete this form and return it to us in the enclosed return envelope by January 31, 1986. January 21, 1986 Page 3 Following receipt of your replies, we will summarize these responses and submit our analysis to the City Council. A copy of the analysis will be sent to you, along with a notice of the date and time at which the City Council will formally consider this issue. After that hearing, the City Council will decide whether or not to order the project installed. Note: At the neighborhood meeting several property owners expressed serious concern regarding the difficulty in backing out of their driveways onto Humboldt Avenue. At that time we suggested two alternate remedies for this problem - ie. (a) construction of a "backaround" adjacent to the driveway or (b) construction of some form of horseshoe driveway (see sketches attached). If the sidewalk project is approved, it would be advantageous to coordinate installation of such driveway modifications into the same project. While the cost for those modifications would be the responsibility of the benefited property owner, the City would certainly be willing to work with you in trying to get this accomplished. So, if you're interested in this type of driveway modification, please include that in your reply to our questionaire. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 561 -5440. Yours very truly, Sy Knapp Director of Public Works Enclosures SK: jn HUMBOLDT CNUE SIDEWALK MAILING 69TH TO 71ST AND 72ND TO WOODBINE O ford T. Hill Aynn Gooley 7027 Humboldt Avenue North 1501 Woodbine Lane Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 John A. Dorholt vDaniel J. Morrissette, Sr_ 7031 Humboldt Avenue North 1500 - 72nd Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Gale R. Anderson 7025 Humboldt Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Lee James Hollister 7019 Humboldt Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 i 00sklyn ie D. Horbal Humboldt Avenue North Center, MN 55430 ./Paul H. Byrne 7007 Humboldt Avenue North Brooklyn Center, .MN 55430 t !Robert J. Beugen Robert J. Beugen 7001 Humboldt Avenue North 2395 West County Road C2 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Roseville, MN 55113 Brookdale Towers Program • Brookdale Towers Program 6915 Humboldt Avenue North 5217 Wayzata Boulevard #108 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works RE: Sidewalks on Humboldt Avenue North In response to your letter dated January 21, 1986, I submit the following comments: I (we) support the proposed sidewalk installation. I (we) oppose the proposed sidewalk installation. Comments /Questions: Names(s) Address Telephone 73 RD AVE. N0. WOODBINE LA. N�A�V�E�.N. F-1 T w s z 72 ND AVE. NO. w AMY LANE 0 J 1 x....72 D AVE. NO. T I z z z 7 1 ST AVE. N0. Z FFI vi wui t > a a c > Q z z z W D p N Z W Q cc ir C _ Q W W a V W Q ; cc f!f im U. . Q W I to Z 70 T H AVE. NO. El i EXISTING SIDEWALK �� ■�f PROPOSED SIDEWALK ATC 85 -033 12 HOUR PEDESTRIAN COUNT - OCTOBER 22, 1985 HUMBOLDT AVENUE - 69TH TO 71ST AVENUES 1. West side of Humboldt Avenue from 69th Avenue to 70th Avenue . 7:00 - 8:00 4 1:00 - 2:00 0 8:00 - 9:00 2 2:00 3 :00 0 9 :00 - 10:00 0 3:00 4:00 1 10:00 - 11:00 3 4:00 - 5:00 4 bikes 11:00 12 :00 0 5:00 6:00 1' 12:00 - 1:00 0 6:00 - 7:00 0 Total 11 +4bikes 2. West side of Humboldt Avenue from 70th Avenue to 71st Avenue 7:00 8 :00 7 1:00 2:00 0 8:00 - 9:00 5 2:00 - 3:00 1 9:00 - 10:00 0 3:00 - 4 :00 10` 10 :00 11:00 2 4:00 - 5:00 1 11:00 12:00 0 5.00 _ 6 0 12:00 - . I:00 0 6:00 - ?.00 3 Total 29 Attached is 15 minute breakdown. ATC 85 -034 SCHOOL HOUR PEDESTRIAN COUNT - OCTOBER 22, 1985 WOODBINE LANE AND HUMBOLDT AVENUE Woodbine Lane Humboldt Avenue Both directions between West side only between Humboldt & Knox Avenues Woodbine & 73rd Avenue 7:45 8:00 1 p 8:00 - 8:15 0 1 8:15 8:30 8 3 8:30 - 8:45 0 p 8:45 - 9:00 p p 9 4 11:30 - 11:45 0 p 11:45 — 12:00 0 p 12:00 - 12:15 0 p 12:15 - 12:30 0 p 12:30 12:45 0 p 0 0 3:15 3:30 0 0 3:30 - 3:45 5 1 3:45 - 4:00 3 p 4:00 4:15 0 0 � C � I Lot Line 35 " s.rmoe 2' � a Lof Li.7e I i GoT`G ripe 5 Stn/. 33' 35 "Se7, act T y/ °ic a / I I . I I 1 I d a J Q I 1 x Q Z I s ` I I in e- I I � MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City ger FROM: Brad Hoffman, HRA Coord' for _L DATE: July 11, 1986 \ SUBJECT: Squad Cars Bids for four (4) new vehicles will be before the Council Monday evening. As previously discussed, you will recall that Viking Chevrolet failed to place our order for police squads. At this time, 1986 police packages are no longer available. As a result, I have obtained a bid (only one dealer submitted a bid) for the delivery of vehicles in late September to replace the 1986 vehicles that were not purchased. Viking Chevrolet has agreed to supply the City with four (4) 1987 vehicles at the 1986 price. These vehicles would be the vehicles normally purchased in 1987. However, General Motors will no longer be offering a police package. Because their bid was for a police package, we should anticipate a reduction in price of approximately $800 per vehicle. We are currently discussing this with Viking Chevrolet. I will update the Council Monday evening. G Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR DELIVERY OF FOUR (4) FOUR -DOOR POLICE PATROL SEDANS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center that the specifications for the delivery of four 4 Four -Door Police Patrol Sedans are hereby approved. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR FOUR (4) FOUR -DOOR POLICE PATROL SEDANS WHEREAS, written quotations were accepted for the purchase of Four (4) Four -Door Police Patrol Sedans. WHEREAS, the quotations received were as follows: BIDDER QUOTATION Polar Chevrolet & Mazda $45,860.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the quotation for Four (4) Four- Door Police Patrol Sedans from Polar Chevrolet & Mazda in the amount of $45,860 is hereby accepted and the City Manager is hereby authorized to contract for the purchase of the Police Patrol Sedans in the amount of $45,860 from Polar Chevrolet & Mazda. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was . duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 9; Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTINGENCY APPROPRIATION FOR PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT LAWN MOWER WHEREAS, the City's 1979 Gravely Tractor with 72 inch mower (Unit No. - 241, Serial No. 00337341, Model No. GMT9000) was destroyed by accidental fire on July 8, 1986; and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the City's insurance policy will reimburse the City to the extent of the current value of said unit; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has recommended to the Council that this unit be replaced with a new 72" mower using contingency funds to pay the difference between the cost of the new unit and the reimbursement received from the insurance company; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has obtained the following quotations for the furnishing of a new tractor with mower: Supglier Proposal Amount Kortuem's Sales (John Deere) $ 8,457.60 Minnesota Toro, Inc. (Toro) $ 8,875.00 AND, WHEREAS, the City Council determines that it is imperative that the City acquire the proper equipment to assure continued maintenance of the park system: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The proposal submitted by Kortuem's Sales of Maple Plain in the amount of $8,457.60 is hereby determined to be the lowest proposal received complying to the specifications. Said proposal is hereby accepted. The City Manager is authorized and directed to proceed with the purchase of said equipment. 2. The Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to transfer from the Contingency Fund to the Park Maintenance Division of the Public Works Department an amount equal to the difference between the total purchase price of the equipment and the amount paid by the insurance company. RESOLUTION N0. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Y P P Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR IMPROVEMENT OF STORM SEWER SYSTEM THROUGH CENTERBROOK GOLF COURSE WHEREAS, pursuant to an agreement between the City of Brooklyn Center and the Minnesota Department of Transportation a study has been conducted to determine the need for upgrading the storm sewer system, which crosses the Centerbrook Golf Course between T.H. 100 and Shingle Creek; and WHEREAS, said study has shown that it is necessary to replace MNDOT's existing 27 inch storm sewer with a new 48 inch storm sewer at an estimated cost of $200,000; and WHEREAS, the agreement between the City and MNDOT provides that the City is to proceed with construction of said storm sewer with the provision that MNDOT will reimburse the City for its share on the basis of contributed flow, and it is estimated that MNDOT's share will be approximately 65% of the total cost; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works and MNDOT representatives have reached a tentative agreement to proceed with construction of the required storm sewer on the basis of an a 6- Golf Course a change order to Contract 198 C g Construction Project) if an acceptable cost agreement can be negotiated with the contractor, Shafer Contracting, Inc., and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has obtained a proposal from Barr Engineering Company to prepare the construction plans and specifications required to detail the proposed work, to allow negotiations with the contractor to be made, and to provide the basis of a finalized agreement with MNDOT. The cost for said services is estimated at $5,700.00: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of . Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The proposal of Barr Engineering to prepare plans and specifications for this improvement is hereby accepted. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement for said services. 2. The Director of Public Works is hereby authorized and directed to conduct negotiations with Shafer Contracting, Inc. for the purpose of developing a change order to Contract 1986 -C providing for the construction of the proposed storm sewer. 3. The Director of Public Works is hereby authorized and directed to conduct negotiations with the Minnesota Department of Transportation for the purpose of developing an agreement relating to cost sharing for this improvement. RESOLUTION NO. 4. Upon completion of negotiations, the Director of Public Works is hereby authorized and directed to report the results of said negotiations to the City Council so that the Council may approve or disapprove said agreements. 5. All costs for this project, including construction costs and engineering costs shall be charged to Account No. 2611, the Restricted Reserve Fund Balance Account of the Municipal State Aid Street Fund. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 s 0 Engineering Company Douglas W. Barr John D. Dickson L. R. Molsather Allan Gebhard Leonard J. Kremer Dennis E. Palmer July 10, 1986 Mr. Sylvester Knapp Director of Public Works City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55429 Dear Mr. Knapp: Per your request, we have prepared a estimate of the cost to prepare plans, specifications, and an engineer's cost estimate for the stormsewer replacing the 24 -inch CMP located in Lions Park, Brooklyn Center. The cost includes the preparation of contract plans and specifications for a 48 -inch RCP from the median of Highway 100 through the park, parallel to the 60 -inch RCP in place. Meetings with the Minnesota Department of Transportation after their review of the contract plans and specifications and with the City of Brooklyn Center and George Watson of Brauer and Associates are planned. Our estimate of cost includes one meeting with the Minnesota Department of Transportation and two meetings with the City. Three visits to the site during construction are also included. We propose to complete the above work for a lump sum of $5,700. The estimate does not include field survey, soil borings, 'construction staking, or regular construction inspection. If additional services are required, we will be happy to complete them on a time and expenses or negotiated lump sum basis. If you require additional information, please contact Suzanne Jiwani or me. We look forward to the opportunity to continue working with you on this project. Yours truly, / Leonard J. Kr,eme �� 1 LJK /llc Accepted by the City of Brooklyn Center SK /303,0 by and by City ger Mayor 7803 Glenroy Road Minneapolis, MN 55035 6121830 -0555 /d MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald Splinter, City y Manager FROM: Kristin Lee, Public Health Sanitarian DATE: July 9, 1986 SUBJECT: Private Kennel License for Jeffrey Lewis and Janelle Klimek at 5732 Knox Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN An inspection was made June 24, 1986 of the Jeff -Lewis and Janelle Klimek residence at 5732 Knox Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN. Mr. Lewis and Ms. Klimek own four (4) dogs and one (1) cat. All five animals are over eight years old. One dog is a small male dachshund cross. The other three dogs are purebred German Shepherds. Two of these are female and the third is a neutered male. The cat is a male, black domestic long hair and is ten years old. The dogs spend much of their time in the backyard which - is enclosed completely by a six foot privacy fence. They have the run of the backyard when the owners are home. When the owners are not home, the dogs are put into a smaller kennelled area within the backyard. This kennel is on cement and is enclosed with chain link fencing. Fecal matter was being removed from the backyard three to four times a week, but I recommended increasing the frequency to daily cleanup. There was no evidence of sanitation problems during my inspection of the home and yard. The Police files show that the property owners were notified of the need for a kennel license numerous times, beginning in 1982. The Health Department also issued orders to obtain a kennel license when K. Lee investigated a garbage complaint at the property on April 21, 1986. Orders were also issued to abate the garbage problem. The property is now in compliance with the garbage and refuse ordinance. K. Lee allowed until May 2, 1986 for the owners to apply for the kennel license. No application was made by that date. Patti Page was notified of the situation and she also sent a series of orders to apply for the kennel license. The application for license was finally made June 13, 1986 by Janelle Klimek. The Police files also show record of a barking dog complaint made April 10, 1986 (see attached Police reports). During my inspection of the home on June 24, 1986, the dogs were very well - behaved and responded to the owner's commands. The inspection of the property on June 24 showed that the owners do meet the minimum standards of the ordinance. However, because of the long history of animal- related problems and hostility toward the CEO's at this address and due to the lack of responsibility demonstrated by the owners in making application for the kennel license, I cannot recommend approval of this license. It should also be noted that had Lewis and Klimek applied for the kennel license when first ordered to by the CEO's in 1982, they would already be past the deadline (three years form initial application) to be in possession of no more than two dogs. Unrelated to the kennel license, there has also been a continuing problem with junk cars at this address. MlYI TIC2?A -1-2: Cp ^ p '! z. nan Com�laiz�: NAME: _ NAME: ADDRES: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: TELEPHON£: MATURE OF CO.*SLPTNT: ACTION TA_K"2v DATE TINM : LtL -4A�-4hlka 1. A C vr `f7l 9 I .� ,d , FOLLOwu : / Jl ic _S , i i CALLS FOR SERVICE ®'j +t RETRIEVE MODE — AGENCY: 1 *INCIDENT NOS 6422 §= CALL TYPES QgG_ TAGG —M DATE REPORTED: O; APTt CITYt ® COMPL NAME: REFUSED_ _- _COMPL ADDRESSt5738 _KN PH ONE S ® REMARKS:BARK _ -- -- - ----. ---------- ---- -� i ® PRTY :_ SRC:P RD:1; - 1 14 4 BEAT :OOQQ TAKERS —IDt_ DISP— IDsOO699 CMND AREAS_, RECVDs 1ge ;Q DISPs 1 @e22 ARV• iBs31 TRANSPs OQtQO BOOKED• OQzOQ- CLRs 11 U A SS IGNED11231, DISPO COMOS REP RI , D ISPO REMARKS: ' ^ - -: POLICE #s FIRE #s SQUABS 2_ DR NO: 4 t _ � • ' CALLS FOR SERVICE * RETL3 MADE —* *AG NCY$ *INCIDENT NOS B; jQQj��l CALL TYPE s OQQ DATE REPORTED• QZ, LOCs 5732 KNOX AV APTs CITY• COMPL NAMES P HON E • sat — aa2� AREAS C OMPL ADDRESSt73JAMES AVENUF. NQR_�H_ I REMARKS sPR081_EM_ WI_TLF_QQGG_ —I4Q MANILAT__1399IHENCE --- --- A DVISED PRTYt_ SRC:P RDt1Sl_4 BEATtgQQQ TAKERS—I DISP- IDsOOUM CMNp AREAS RECVDS 1Zt4�, DISPt 1Z sl44 ARV• 1Zt J TRANSPs QQsQ¢ '800KEDt 2 CLRs 1Z UNITS A SSIGNED• 4 t ___DIS PO C ODE SOS REP R E • DISPO REMARKSt_ ` — pR No s POLICE #: FIRE #t ~ SQUADS 2 M 1�- - i_ -- CALLS FOR SERVICE �I� —. * REIRIEVE_MODE * . *AGENCY: 1 *INCIDENT NOS $ Q1i9s1 .CALL TYPES 0 R_Z_ DATE REPORTEDs 1; LOC: KNOX_AV NQ _, -- - - --- -- �— ^....,— �....— ..._ CITY• COMPL NAMES _N_A_SS i COMPL ADDRESSs w ________ PHONE: — AREAt 4 REMARKS: NO_ KgNNg6-6 ICENSE___ " __�_____________�___� PRTY: SRC:S BQ- 1514_ BEAT OOQO TAKERS — ID OS REP REQ:N F DISPO REMARKS: _ —--- POLICE #t — - - - -- FIRE #s - - � ~ -- SQUADS Z_ OR NOS MEMORANDUM TO: Brad Hoffman FROM: Jim Lindsay DATE: July • u y 2, 1986 SUBJECT: Dog Complaints, Jeffrey Sander Lewis, Janelle Lynn Klimek, 5732 Knox Avenue North Attached please find copies of reports as they relate to the above captioned parties. If you have any questions, please contact me CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT 82 -1030 Outside Offense 10 Yes 2 No C File No. _ � PUBLI ORDER CRIME #7399 Nature of Offense Location of Offense S7 32 KnQx Avenue North Date Reported 1 - — R7 Time: Dote Committed 6-8 -81 to ur esent Time- Tntnl Value of Loss Name of Complainant Ronald WARREN Res. Phone Address of Complainant Brooklyn Center Planning & Inspeetion Phone 561 - 5440 Cit R State rooklyn Center Minnesota Disposition 10 Unfounded 20CIrd by Arrest 30Exc Clyd 40Inoctive SCNOther Arrests 1[:]Adult 20Juvenile 308oth 4MNone Officer Assigned to Case: _ NAGS Transferred to; Supervisor Approved (Disp.): Supt. App. Dote and Time Report Made 1-20-82 @ 1130 Jeff LEWIS KEEPING MORE THAN 2 DOGS CST PREMISES 5732 Knox Avenue North BC /OR /1 -106 Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Tag #23- 689479 On 1 -20 -82 Code Enforcement Officer George NASS received a written complaint notice from the Brooklyn Center Planning &inspection De- partment, their complaint number C- 1123, written on the 18th. of January 1982, turned in by Bob ZIMBRICK of the Brooklyn Center Water Department. Bob ZIMBRICK noted seven (7) dogs at this resi- dence when hqfaas there reading the water meter. On June 8, 1981 NASS gave verbal warning to the owner about having more than two adult dogs on the premises. At that time the owner, Jeff LEWIS, stated that there was only two adult dogs and four other dogs were puppies of five months of age. At that time NASS also noted that there were two junk cars in the driveway and also informed LEWIS that this was against city code. At that point NASS was told by LEWIS that he had no right to go up on the property and check on his junk vehicles. Since 6 -8 -81 NASS has received other complaints and has never been able to have anyone answer the door even though it has appeared that there was somebody at home. On 1 -20 -82 NASS and Colleen COOPER, #22, from the Metropolitan, Animal Patrol Service (MAPSI), went to the house at 1130 hours and observed .* one German Sheperd in the back yard and another German Sheperd through the side window of the house. NASS and COOPER heard at least three other dogs in the house by the different barking that was going on and coming from different parts of the house. From the sound of the dogs it appeared that these were also adult dogs. Since NASS has been un- able to talk to the homeowner when he has been at the house, this citation was mailed to LEWIS. G. NASS, CEO cc Court rp Tickler Date MEMO= CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER To vti... ✓ 1 I�...� Date ' r6 tom/ C A V OID VERBAL MESSAGE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER COMPLAINT RECORD ' PLANNING AND INSPECTION DEPARTMENT O N. c- 1123 Date / Time: Taken By: Assigned To: Location: oZ Residential ❑ Other , Against: - Phone: . n 0 cupant OContractor ONeighbor ❑Other a Complainant: r f Phone: Tenant ighbor Own r QCity ❑Other Address: Nature of Complaint: ❑Zoning ❑Housing OBuilding OSign YOther fir► -rAZ Detail 06 24 IL Action aken: CCalled Utter e Police /Sanitarian OWar ing Tag 0Citation Remark: Date/Time Completed: Inspector: P/I FORM NO.33 ORIGINAL TO INSPECTOR COPY TO DIRECTOR CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT i 82- 03074 Outside Offense 1 File No. O Yes 20No Nature of Offense DOG COMPLAINT & TAGS #9806 Location of Offense 5727 James Avenue Nort Date Reported 3 -03 -82 Time: 1320 Date Committed 3 -03-82 Time _ 1320 Tatnl Value of Loss Name of Complainant MAPSI, Coleen COOPER #22 Res. Phone 560 -2851 Address of Complainant SOH 69th Avenue North #116 Bus. Phone 339 -6666 Cit & state Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Disposition 10 Unfounded 2OCIrdby Arrest 3OExc Clyd 40Inactive 500ther Arrests lOAdult 20Juvenile 306oth 40None Officer Assigned to Case; Transferred o; Supervisor Approved (Disp.)• Supr. Al p . Date and Time Rep Mods 3 - 03 -82 Jeffrey LEWIS DOG RUNNING LOOSE 5732 Knox Avenue North BC /OR 1 -108 Brooklyn Centre, Mn. 55430 Tag #23 609007 Tag #23 689008 KEEPING OF DOGS LIMITED BC /OR 1 -106 Tag #23 689009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Received complaint of two German Shepards running loose in the area of 5727 James. Went to location where I observed two Shepards in back yard of 5727 James. They wouldn't come to me so I chased one of them to 5732 Knox, where they own several Shepards. Upon arriving two were in backyard, two were out. The roomate of the owner put dogs back in fenced area, I then issued the above listed citations. MAPSI, CC #22 4 bj CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT File No, 82-0382 Outside Offense 10 Yes ZONo DOG COMPLAINTS #9806 Nature of Offense _ Location of Offense !)132 Knox Avenue North Date Reported 03-17—$2 Time: 1002 Dote Committed 03 -17-82 Time; 1002 Totnl Value of Loss Nome of Complainant L. V. OLSON Res. Phone Address of Complainant 573_0 James Avenue Nor h Bus. Phone City R State Rr pp]{ivn n r Mi nnPGnta Disposition IOUnfounded 20CIrd by Arrest 30Exc Clyd 401noctive SM30ther Arrests 10Adult 20Juvenile 30$oth 41$None Officer Assigned to Case: NASS CEO OFFICER Transferred t ; Supervisor Approved (Cis p .); � — Supr. App. Dote and Time R rt Mods 03 - -82 @ 0745 On March 17, 1982, Code Enforcement Officer George NASS was dispatched to the 5700 block of James Avenue North because shepherds at 5732 Knox had jumped the fence. Upon arriving at the area, NASS went onto the property behind 5732 Knox and observed one (1) adult German Shepherd that had jumped the fence. In walking towards the dog, it began bark- ing and growling at NASS. At that time, a woman opened up the patio door at 5732 Knox Avenue North and called for the dog to come back into the yard. The dog jumped the fence and returned to the yard. NASS, at that point, advised the woman that the Police Department was receiving too many complaints about her dogs jumping the fence. She informed NASS that she would tie up the dogs. NASS also observed two (2) other black dogs in the yard and another dog in the house. The residents of 5732 Knox Avenue North, Jeffrey Sanders LEWIS, have previously been given the following citations 01 -19 -82 - Public Order Crime - More than Two (2) Dogs - Case #82 -01030 Tag #23- 689479 03 -03 -82 - Three (3) additional citations Case - #82- 03070 were issued - Dog at Large Tag #23- 690007 Dog at Large - Tag #23- 690008 More Than two Tag #23- 690009 (2) Dogs The neighbors are very much concerned for their safety and the safety of their small dog, even to the point of asking NASS what the fine would be if they shot the shepherd while he was attacking them or their dog. NASS informed them that this would be against the Brooklyn ;Center ordinance and they should contact Captain KLINE at the Police Department for further information. No citation was issued today. pis cc: Chief Lindsay CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT .File No. 83-1 Outside Offense 10 Yes 2BINo Nature of Offense DOG COMPLAINT 4 ,9806 Location of Offense 5732 KnoX Avenue North Date Reported 10 -20 -83 Time: Dote Committed _ 1-19-82 to Presen Time: Totnl Value of Loss Name of Complainant _ CEO G or e NASS � Res. Phone Address of Complainant Brnokl ri r Po 1 i Ce Dept- Bus. Phone City R State rank l4n CAnfPr_ Mi nnPS.Ot a Disposition lOUnfounded 20CIrd by Arrest 30Exc Clyd 4O1nactive 5WOther Arrests 1OAdult 20Juvenile 30Both 4=None Officer Assigned to Case: _- T�7j� Transferred to: Supervisor Approved (Disp.)• Supr. App. Date and Time Report Mods 10- 23 -83 @ 0905 On 10 -20 -83 CEQ'NASS was sent to 5712 Logan Avenue North for a dog at large. Upon arriving NASS observed a large male German Shepherd in front of this residence. Shortly after arriving at this address Officer HANDY arrived to assist NASS. The officers could not get close to the dog and an older juvenile boy tried to get the dog as he knew the dog; this was not successful. The dog did follow the boy and went to the dog's owner's home. NASS and HANDY arrived at the house at the same time and NASS went to the door and a woman came to the door and let the dog into the home. At this time there was a dog fight in the house and NASS and HANDY were able to deter- mine that there was two Shepherds and another small dog in the front room of the house. NASS informed the party that answered the door that a citation would be written for a dog at large because the Shep- herd was observed on Logan Avenue North. The citation, #23- 750176, for confinement and control of dog was handed to the person answering the door. At this time the woman became very angry that NASS always has a police officer with him when issuing a citation. She stated she has called the police captain at Brooklyn Center and complained about this practice. NASS tried to explain to her that the officer was also trying to get the dog. At that time both officers left the property. The dog's owner - Jeffrey Sanders LEWIS, has previously been issued two citations for having more than two dogs, one on 1 -19 -82 A82- 01030, and again on 3 -3 -82 #82- 03074. Since 1 -19 -82 LEWIS has been issued seven citations for dog complaints; the woman stated to NASS and HANDY that they were not going to comply with the ordinance and to keep on tagging them. NASS is also unable to find that LEWIS has bought lic- enses for the dogs. On March 17, 1982 NASS was sent to the 5700 block of James Avenue North because one of the dogs owned by LEWIS was continually jumping the fence and coming into the neighbors yard. This complaint was from a L.D. OLSON at 5730 James Avenue North. He stated the neighbors are very much concerned for their safety and the safety of their small dog and children, even to the point of asking NASS what the fine would be .if they shot the Shepherd while he was attacking them or their dog. NASS informed them that this would be against the law and to contact Capt. KLINE at the police department for further informatmn. BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE INVESTIGATION REPORT Form 17 ` DOG COMPLAINT #9806 Offense Complainant NAS S o Address BCPD #2 83- 1586.1... On 1 -19 -82 Bob ZIMBRICK from the Brooklyn Center Water Dept. noted seven dogs at this residence when he was reading water meters. Some other means must be found to make LEWIS comply with the animal ordinances of Brooklyn Center. It appears he just pays the fines and continues to violate the ordinances. On 4 -13 -82 LEWIS vas issued a citation #23- 690998 for dog at large. He pled guilty in court, was fined $50.00 with $25.00 suspended. NASS rP Signed Date Time 9rookiyn P"q. 6 Adv. Co. Inc. 16121561 ."70 j - - - _` +' C! °'NN S01A l� ISDEFT:Ereiii3P. —PiTTY WSDE'e'�5erlNOR MUNICIPALCOUItT t : I et Lriq Y C 2 6 N O. _ r VEHICLE ' �' r# . . LIC NO 7 }. YR. ST. AD REST � f ^ � �,t /' ,�'B -•�� r�"T'%rt•� � MAKE MODEL COLO +F C17. � '. — ST ZIP / +� DATE: MO. DAY YR. T114 v D.O.u. HT. WT. SEX PLACE STAT. �•.:; LIC. NO STATE OFD. f V!C L a '. s4' T�'� N ER " u'D IvGER ACCIDENT . Cam UNSAFE OR i' I . ` F2O °ERiY � tt tt ONDiTi O N ��'CCC��..JJJ "'"`' ` s — ACTIVITY C .. (VISION OMM. CODE BA GE N ..; ti i t d PENALTIES WILL BE ASSESSED AND AN ARREST WARRANT WILL BE R ±� .-,rs� , ISSUED FOR NOT RESPONDING TO THIS CITATION WITHIN 7DAYS AT THE VIOLATIONS' BUREAU LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. .K . ^.... SIGNATURE r gike.: r s i I 3qc�� BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE INVESTIGATION REPORT co Form 17 i w Offense w y rn � z Complainant o Address DISPO &- 23 -82, LEWIS, Jeffrey Sanders DOB: 4 -12 -56 Guilty Dog at Large. $50.00 fine $25.00 suspended. bj Signed Date Time STATE OF MINNESOTA 1+ ISD>EMI[ANOR -PETTY MISDIA UNCIR MUNICIPAL COURT t1ENNEPiN GDIiNYY CITATION No. � `? 6 9 t'1 5 5 0 { ,✓ U t F VEHICLE _ s NAME LIC. NO. "I YR.—ST. MAKE MODEL COLO CITY � - � �Z � DATE: MO DAY }� JUV . D.O.B. ti - PLAC �f F E HT WT SEX -. l;r .:c� _. - .ct• STAT. _� - '�;Lt,t s w 4 � �n - -- OPER _ OR x y; LIC. NO K ` ;` ' `' STA ^ ORD. I VIOL `�1 r f METER �' ii C ANGER UNSAFE' OR ACCIDENT ONDITIONPERTY ACTIVITY COU, ISION cimX&I E BADG NO. a PENALTIES WILL BE ASSESSED AND AN ARREST WARRANT WILL BE ISSUED FOR NOT RESPONDING TO THIS CITXTION WITHIN 7DAYS L AT THE VIOLATIONS BUREAU LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE.:. W49 S52 SIGNATURE I�a1 _ . .. 1 � 4 • k k or . � T _ MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager P � Y g r FROM: Tom Heenan, Sanitarian DATE: July 11, 1986 SUBJECT: Private Kennel License at 5732 Knox Avenue North We have received information from the residents adjacent to this address as follows: 1. The dogs are loose at least some of the time. 2. There are two additional dogs in the house. These dogs were removed prior to our inspection and subsequently returned. 3. The occupants behave in a manner that has caused several neighbors to feel intimidated. APPLICATION FOR PRIVATE KENNEL LICENSE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA TO THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL RECE IVED JUN 131986 _ Date: Jjqj(jEV,_ LYNA K(j 1. Applicant's Name (Last, First, Middle) 2. Applicant's Address (Number, Street, City, State, Zip Code) '71 . WOK A-LkE, y� 3. Address or Legal Description of Pro osed Kennel 4. Attach a sketch or drawing with this application describing the construction and operation of the proposed kennel, or, if the animals are to be confined within the family dwelling unit, indicate this on the application. 5. Indicate number of animals to be confined within the proposed kennel, together with their age breed and sex 6E.rma-, Sly E � �n 6. PLEASE NOTE: The license fee in the amount of $30.00 must be submitted with this application. Signature of Applicant PLEASE RETURN COMPLETED APPLICATION AND LICENSE FEE TO: City Clerk, City of Brooklyn Center, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430. DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE New License V Renewal License License Period through License Fee Received REG1- D JUN131986 ins wow m #y�_ � 1 a 1 di r " w Y� Y r Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DISEASED SHADE TREE REMOVAL COST TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS WHEREAS, the Tree Inspector of the City of Brooklyn Center has caused the removal of diseased trees on certain property within the City during 1985 under the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.023 and by written agreement with the owners of such property; and WHEREAS, two assessment rolls, a copy of each of which is attached hereto and made part hereof by reference, have been prepared by the City Clerk, one tabulating those properties where diseased shade tree removal costs are less than or equal to $300.00 and one tabulating those properties where diseased shade tree removal costs are greater than $300.00 together with the amounts proposed to be assessed to each property; and WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for Diseased Shade Tree Removal Costs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Said assessment rolls of diseased shade tree removal costs are hereby adopted and certified as the following levies: 1985 tree removal costs less than or equal to $300 Levy No. 10194 1985 tree removal costs greater than $300 Levy No. 10193 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of years as listed below. The first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1988, and shall bear interest at the rate of twelve (12) percent per annum from August 1, 1986. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from August 1, 1986 until December 31, 1987. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. a. Assessments less than or equal to $300.00 are payable in three annual installments. b. Assessments greater than $300.00 are payable in five annual installments RESOLUTION N0. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION Improvement Project No.: 1985 -08 Levy No.: 10193 Description: Fund /Code No.: Diseased Shade Tree Removal Program Levy Description: TREE REMOVALS 85 -5 Location: Levy runs five (5) years with interest at the rate of twelve (12) percent. Various City Locations First payment, with property taxes payable in Improvement Hearing Date: NA 1987 shall include seventeen (17) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: NA Date of Assessment Hearing: July 14, 1986 by Resolution No.: NA Adopted on: Assessment District: by Resolution No.: Various City Locations Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Method of Apportionment: Actual Cost of Removal Agreed on by City /Owner Agreement Cost Summary from Resolution No.: NA Total Improvement Cost: NA Less Direct City Share: NA (Fund M.S.A.) Less Other Payments: NA Total Assessed to Property: $ 2,555.85 Assessed to City Owned Property: Assessed to Other Public Property: 1985 TREE REMOVALS - 5 YEARS CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS PAGE 1 OF 1 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL LOT BLOCK UNITS Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address 10193 01- 118 -21 -22 -0066 89621 $464.96 10 EDWIN E. NELSON'S 3RD ADDITION JEROLD 6 PATRICIA PAYNE 6015 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH 6015 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 10194 01- 118 -21 -43 -0084 89225 $903.61 16 2 BELLVUE ACRES DOUGLAS J & JANINE S KRONE 5400 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH 5400 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 10193 03- 118 -21 -42 -0013 89665 $496.94 2 7 PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 1ST ADDITION DANIEL 6 DEBORAH DRURY 5648 NORTHPORT DRIVE 5648 NORTHPORT DRIVE BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 10193 33- 119 -21 -41 -0013 89245 $376.35 13 1 BERGSTROM'S LYNSIDE MANOR JAMES S MARGUERITE MILLER 6324 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH 6324 ORCHARD AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 10193 34- 119 -21 -24 -0051 1791 $313.99 2 1 HAMM'S ADDITION FINANCIAL REAL ESTATE CONSULTANTS, INC. 6501 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 6040 EARLE BROWN DRIVE, SUITE 220 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 TOTAL LEVY NO. 10193 $2,555.85 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION Improvement Project No.: 1985 -08 Levy No.: 10194 Description: Fund /Code No.: Diseased Shade Tree Removal Program Levy Description: TREE REMOVAL 85 -3 Location: Levy runs three (3) years Various City Locations with interest at the rate of twelve (12) percent. Improvement Hearing Date: NA First payment, with property taxes payable in 1987 shall include seventeen (17) whole months interest. Improvement Ordered on: NA Date of Assessment Hearing: July 14, 1986 by Resolution No.: NA Adopted on: Assessment District: by Resolution No.: Various City Locations Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: Method of Apportionment: i Actual Cost of Removal Agreed on by City /Owner Agreement Cost Summary from Resolution No.: NA Total Improvement Cost: NA Less Direct City Share:. NA (Fund M.S.A.) Less Other Payments: NA Total Assessed to Property: $ 3,289.24 Assessed to City Owned Property: Assessed to Other Public Property: Assessed to Private Property: $ 3,289.24 1985 TREE REMOVALS - 3 YEARS CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS PAGE OF 2 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL LOT BLOCK UNITS Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address 10194 01- 118 -21 -32 -0038 89001 $286.24 UNPLATTED LAND JOHN E RYAN 5550 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH 5550 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 10194 01- 118 -21 -33 -0004 89350 $133.01 4 1 ELLSWORTH ADDITION SABER K & MARY A SHIPP 5321 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH 5321 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 10194 01- 118 -21 -33 -0062 89365 $108.54 2 FAIRHAVEN PARK JAMES K 6 SUSAN F BURNETTE 5405 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH 5405 GIRARD AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 10194 01- 118 -21 -43 -0064 89225 $290.50 7 2 BELLVUE ACRES ROGER M 5 PATRICIA A KLEIS 5333 - 4TH STREET NORTH 5333 - 4TH STREET NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 10194 01- 118 -21 -43 -0094 90112 $288.37 A SUPER ADDITION WILLIAM VYE VACANT LAND 460 - 5TH AVENUE NORTH, 5139 HOPKINS, MN 55343 10194 02- 118 -21 -33 -0026 89535 $285.18 23 LILAC VIEW ADDITION MASAYUKI INOUE 2806 - 53RD AVENUE NORTH 2806 —53RD AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 10194 62- 118 -21 -34 -0014 89280 $133.01 1 3 BROOK PARK ADDITION SALLEY E PINNEY 2401 - 55TH AVENUE NORTH 2401 - 55TH AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 10194 03- 118- 21 -11- 0128 89440 $133.01 18 9 HIPP'S 3RD ADDITION MARY L GRAFFUNDER 5948 YORK AVENUE NORTH 5948 YORK AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 10194 03- 118 -21 -13 -0053 89665 $285.18 7 5 PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 1ST ADDITION MARGARET B ANDERSON 3505 ADMIRAL LANE APRIL J S MARGARET LUBIN 3505 ADMIRAL LANE BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 10194 03- 118 -21 -21 -0021 89667 $159.72 - 31 5 PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION JAMES R HENDEL 6012 PEARSON DRIVE 6012 PEARSON DRIVE BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 10194 U3- 118 -21 -42 -0030 88529 $285.18 B REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1547 UHDE /NELSON, INC. 5607 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 3825 - 85TH AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55443 1985 TREE REMOVALS - 3 YEARS CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS PAGE 2 OF 2 PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER LEVY PROJECT PROPERTY ADDN. TOTAL Address Name NO. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. NO. PRINCIPAL LOT BLOCK UNITS Addition /Legal Description Mailing Address 10194 10- 118 -21 -21 -0035 90080 $92.58 1 4 TWIN LAKE WOODS ADDITION HARRY C BUECHNER 5261 EAST TWIN LAKE BOULEVARD 5261 EAST TWIN LAKE BOULEVARD BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 10194 10- 118 -21 -21 -0043 90080 $285.18 8 4 TWIN LAKE WOODS ADDITION ROBERT P & CATHERINE A LORVICK 5205 EAST TWIN LAKE BOULEVARD 5205 EAST TWIN LAKE BOULEVARD BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 10194 27- 119 -21 -42 -0033 89663 $239.42 9 1 PALMER LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDITION JAMES K MOSSER 3606 WOODBINE LANE 3606 WOODBINE LANE BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 10194 34- 119-21 -24 -0011 89635 $284.12 4 1 NORTHGATE ADDITION GREGORY J BLAZEK 6515 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD 6515 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 TOTAL LEVY NO. 10194 $3,289.24 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, will meet at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, on Monday, July 14, 1986, at 8:00 P.M., local time, to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed assessments for the following improvements: 1985 DISEASED SHADE TREE REMOVAL COSTS It is proposed to assess the cost of diseased shade tree removal to those tracts or parcels where trees were removed during 1985 by written agreement with the property owner or by order of the City Tree Inspector pursuant to City Ordinances, Section 19 -1501 through 19- 1506. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION These assessments are now on file in the office of the City Clerk and open to public inspection. Written or oral objections to the proposed assessments will be considered at this meeting, but the City Council may colftsider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape- recorded. 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final. presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. 1 An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment as to a specific parcel of land may be made unless the owner has either filed a signed written objection to that assessment with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented the written objection to the presiding officer at the hearing. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION FOR DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195, the City Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older, or by a person retired due to permanent and total disability for whom it would be a hardship to make payment. The City Council has established the following qualifying conditions for applicants for deferred payment of special assessments: 1. Applicant must be 65 years of age or older, or retired due to permanent and total disability. s, 2. The applicant's annual income shall not exceed $17,400. 3. The aggregate total of previous special assessment installments plus the first year installment of the current levy must'exceed two (2) percent of the applicant's annual income. The applicant will be required to pay up to two (2) percent of their annual income toward the special assessment; any excess can be deferred. When deferment of a special assessment terminates, for any reason provided in the law, all amounts accumulated plus applicable interest become due. Further information regarding deferred assessments and application forms are available at the City Clerk's office. , IMPORTANT NOTE: TO QUALIFY FOR DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, APPLICATION MUST BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO JULY 5, 1986. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 561 -5440 to make arrangements. F 1 D. K. Weeks - City Clerk By order of the City Council Published in the Brooklyn Center Post on June 26th, 1986. MEMO TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Darlene Weeks, City Clerk Re: Licensing of Bottled and Canned Soft Drink Vending Machines DATE: July 2, 1986 During the 1986 Minnesota Legislative Session a bill was passed and signed into law concerning the licensing of bottled and canned soft drink vending machines. This new law exempts bottled and canned soft drink vending,machines from license and inspection fees previously charged by the City. That is, a license or inspection fee cannot be charged on bottled and canned soft drink machines. This law becomes effective August 1, 1986. The attached ordinance amendment to Chapter 8 and 23 is recommended to clarify our ordinance. 1 1 4 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of , of 1986 at p.m. at the City Hail, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway to consider an amendment to Chapters 8 and 23 regarding licensing of bottled and canned soft drinks. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the Personnel Coordinator at 56 -5440 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 8 AND 23 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING LICENSING OF BOTTLED AND CANNED SOFT DRINKS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: follows: Section 1. Chapter 8, Section 3. Subd. 5 is hereby amended as Section 3. Licenses. Subd. 5. License Fee. Fees for licenses issued hereunder shall be in the amount set forth by the Council from time to time for Bakery Food Vehicles, Catering Food Vehicles, Food Establishments, Itinerant Food Establishments, Readily- perishable Food Vehicles, Vending Machines ( excludes bottled and soft drink vending machines) and Special Food Handling Licenses. Section 2. Chapter 23 -010 is hereby amended as follows: Section 23 -010 LICENSE FEES. The fees for the various licenses shall be as hereinafter stated, not withstanding other ordinance provisions regarding the specific fee. Fee. (annual un- less otherwise Tyne of License Reouired by Section License Expires stated Vending Machine - Vendor [8- 101.01] 88 -Sec.5 February 15 Bulk Vendor $25 Nonperishable Vendor (excludes bottled and canned soft $8 plus $4 per drinking vending machines) machine location Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of 1986. r ORDINANCE N0, Mayor ATTEST: Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Underline indicates new matter.) 13A Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURE OF APPROPRIATION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF ULTIMAP SYSTEM BY LOGIS WHEREAS, the 1986 Budget for the Data Processing Division of the General Fund provided a $30,000 allocation for development of an ULTIMAP system program by LOGIS; and WHEREAS, said allocation was made contingent upon specific City Council approval before such expenditure could be made; and WHEREAS, LOGIS has conducted and completed a cost/benefit evaluation of the ULTIMAP system and has concluded that this is the appropriate time to initiate development of the ULTIMAP system for LOGIS communities; and WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the City Council that substantial cost savings can be effected and that an improved level of service will be made available to the public through the implementation of the UTLIMAP system: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that authorization is hereby granted for the expenditure of the $30,000 appropriation for development of the ULTIMAP system by LOGIS. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY B ROOK LYN F BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTER EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE 911 T0: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works DATE: July 9, 1986 RE: Implementation of ULTIMAP System At the June 23rd meeting, the City Council requested clarification of proposed personnel costs relating to the proposed use of the ULTIMAP system. In our earlier report we attempted to described the costs relating to an optimistic implementation schedule: the initial use of ULTIMAP by the Brooklyn Center Engineering Department during 1986. At the same time, that g analysis also recognized that the two technicians who now y do most of the mapping and plan preparations will probably be retiring (under the rule of 85) in late 1986 or early 1987. Accordingly, that analysis assumed that there .would be an overlap period - during which a part -time employee would be hired during 1986 and trained on the use of ULTIMAP while all current employees remained on board until the end of 1986, using conventional drafting methods and procedures. After additional consideration we feel it is unrealistic to expect that the. ULTIMAP system would be ready for use by the City of Brooklyn Center any time in 1986. Rather, we expect that it will take LOGIS at least 6 to 8 months to make the system available for use by member cities; and we would expect to initiate use of the system during the first half of 1987. In the meanwhile, our two technicians must each decide whether or not to retire under the "Rule of 85" effective on or before July 1, 1987. (Under State law, the Rule of 85 expires then.) If they do retire, any replacement employee(s) would be trained on the use of ULTIMAP. If they do not retire, they would be retrained to use ULTIMAP and utilized for other duties as possible as a result of the increased efficiency resulting from the use of ULTIMAP. At any rate, using conventional drafting methods and procedures, it will be necessary to continue to have two full -time equivalent employees to do the amount of mapping and plan preparation currently done by our department. If, instead the ULTIMAP system is made available tows, we estimate that the staffing level required to produce the same amount of work will be: ,.� 417 � m July 9, 1986 Page 2 in 1987: 1.5 full -time equivalent employees in 1988: 1.35 full -time equivalent employees in 1989: 1.0 full -time equivalent employees after 1989: less than 1.0 full -time equivalent employee Note: However, due to an increased level-of-service demand to the Public Works Department and other City Departments, the staffing requirement is estimated to remain at 1.0 full -time equivalent employee for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, I feel very comfortable in agreeing that at no time during the implementation of the ULTIMAP system will it be necessary to increase our staffing level above its current level. And, as shown above, I believe that our staffing level can be reduced by one full -time equivalent employee within three years of the time that use of the ULTIMAP system is initiated. In summary, it continues to be my opinion that: (1) a direct cost/benefit analysis indicates a 7 year payback period based on current level -of- service, and based on Public Works Department usage only. (2) if a value is assigned to an improved level -of- service, by the Public Works Department and by other City departments, the payback period will be reduced to 3 to 5 years; and (3) that this improved level -of- service (i.e. more information, more accurate information, more readily available information) is expected by the public. Accordingly, I fully believe that implementation of the ULTIMAP system is an investment in future efficiency and improved public service. Respectf lly submitted, Sy Kna , Director of Public Works P.S. The cities of*St. Louis Park, Brooklyn Park and Maple Grove have all now approved $30,000 each for this project. MEMO TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Brad Hoffman, Housing Coordinator SUBJECT: Tax Imposed upon Lodging DATE: July 10, 1986 Effective August 1, 1986 the Minnesota Legislature has authorized the imposition of a tax upon lodging at a hotel, motel, rooming house, tourist court or other use of space by a transient. The imposition of such a tax would provide funding for a convention and tourism bureau to promote the City as a tourist convention and center. The attached ordinance is recommended for a first reading. /36 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a ublic hearing will be held on the P $ day of 1986 at p.m. at City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider creating Chapter 22 of the City Ordinances Relating to a Tax Imposed upon Lodging. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE CREATING CHAPTER 22 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES RELATING TO A TAX IMPOSED UPON LODGING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 22 is hereby created as follows: Section 22 -001 DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this Chapter, the following terms, phrases and words and their derivations shall have the meaning; given herein. When not inconsistent with the context words used in the present tense include the future words in the plural number include the singular number and words in the singular number include the plural number. The word "shall" is always mandatory and not merely directory. Subd. I The term "director" means the Finance Director of the City. Subd. 2. The term "City" means the City of Brooklyn Center. . Subd. 3. The term "lodging" means the furnishing for a consideration of lodging by a hotel motel or rooming house except where such lodging shall be for a continuous period of thirty (30) days or more to the same lodger(s) The furnishing of rooms by religious educational or nonprofit organizations shall not constitute "lodging" for purposes of this Chapter Subd. 4. The term "operator" means a person who provides lodging to others or any officer agent or employee of such person Subd. 5. The term "person" means any individual corporation partnership association estate_ receiver, trustee executor, administrator assi nee syndicate, or any other combination of individuals Whenever the term "person" is used in anv Drovision of this chapter prescribing and imposing a penalty, the term as applied to a corporation association or partnership shall mean the officers, or partners thereof as the case may be Subd. 6 The term "rent" means the total consideration valued in mone charged for lodging whether Paid in money or otherwise but shall not include any charges for services rendered in connection with furnishing lodging other than the room charge itself. Subd. 7. The term "lodger" means the person obtaining lodging from an operator. Section 22 -002. IMPOSITION OF TAX. There is hereby imposed a tax of three -1- ORDINANCE N0. (3%) percent on the rent charged by an operator for providing lodging to any person on and after August 1 1986 The tax shall be stated and charged separately and shall be collected by the operator from the lodger. The tax collected by the overator shall be a debt owed by the operator to the City and shall be extinguished only b a ent to the City. In no case shall the tax g yLP Ym y imposed by this section upon an operator exceed the amount of tax which the operator is authorized and required by this chapter to collect from a lodger, Section 22 -003. COLLECTIONS Each operator shall collect the tax imposed by this chapter at the time the rent is paid The tax collections shall be deemed to be held in trust by the operator for the City. The amount of tax shall be separately stated from the rent charged for the lodging Section 22 -004. EXCEPTIONS AND EXEMPTIONS. Subd. 1. EXCEPTIONS. No tax shall be imposed on rent for lodging paid by any officer or employee of a foreign government who is exempt by reason of exvress provisions of federal law or international treaty. Subd. 2. EXEMPTIONS An exemption shall be granted to any person as to whom or whose occupancy it is beyond the power of the City to tax No exemption shall be granted except upon a claim therefor made at the time the rent is collected. and such a claim shall be made in writing and under penalty of Perjury on forms Drovided by the City. All such claims shall be forwarded to the City when the returns and collections are submitted as required by this chapter. Section 22 -005. ADVERTISING NO TAX It shall be unlawful for anyperator to advertise or hold out or state to the public or any customer, directly or indirectly. that the tax or any part thereof will be assumed or absorbed by the operator, or that it will not be added to the rent or that if added it or any Part thereof will be refunded In computing the tax to be collected amounts of tax less than one cent shall be considered an additional cent. Section 22 -006. PAYMENT AND RETURNS The taxes imposed by this chapter shall be paid by the overator to the City monthly not later than 25 days after the end of the month in which the taxes were collected. At the time of panent the operator shall submit a return upon such forms and containing such information as the director may require The return shall contain the following minimum information 1. The total amount - of rent collected for lodging during the period covered by the return 2. The amount tax required to be collected and due for the period 3. The signature of the person filing the return or that of his agent duly authorized in writing -2- ORDINANCE NO. 4. The period covered by the return 5. The amount of uncollectable rental charges subject to the lodging tax The operator may o ffset against the taxes payable with respect to anv reporting period the amount of taxes imposed by this chapter previously paid as result of any transaction the consideration for which became uncollectable during such reporting period but only in,Rroportion to the portion of such consideration which became uncollectable. Section 22 -007. EXAMINATION OF RETURN ADJUSTMENTS NOTICES AND DEMANDS. The director shall after a return is filed examine the same and make an investigation or examination of the records and accounts of the person making the return deemed necessary for determining its correctness The tax computed on the basis of such examination shall be the tax to be paid. If the tax due is found to be greater than that paid such excess shall be paid to the City within ten (10) days after receipt of a notice thereof given either personally or sent by registered mail to the address shown on the return If the tax paid is greater than the tax found to be due the excess shall be refunded to the person who paid the tax to the City within ten (10) days after determination of such refund. Section 22 -008._ REFUNDS Any Rerson may apply to the director for a refund of taxes _paid for a prescribed period in excess of the amount legally due for that period. provided that no application for refund shall be considered unless filed within-one vear after such tax was paid or within one year from the filing of the return whichever period is the longer. The director shall examine the claim and make and file written findings thereon deLlying or allowin the claim in whole or in part and shall mail a notice thereof by registered mail to such person at the address stated upon the return If such claim is allowed in whole or in part the director shall credit the amount of the allowance against anv taxes due under this chapter from the claimant and the balance of said allowance, if any, shall be paid by the director to the claimant Section 22 -009. FAILURE TO FILE A RETURN. Subd. 1. If. my operator required by this chapter to file a return shall fail to do so within the time prescribed or shall make willfully or otherwise an incorrect false or fraudulent return the operator shall u on written notice and demand file such return or corrected return within five 5 da s of receipt of such written notice and shall at the same time pay any tax due on the basis thereof. If such person shall fail to file such return or corrected return the director shall make a return or corrected return for such Rersbn from such knowledge and information as the director can obtain and assess a tax on the basis thereof which tax (less any payments theretofore made on account of the tax for the taxable period covered by such return) shall be paid upon within five (5) days of the receipt of written notice and demand for such payment. Any such return or assessment made by the director shall be prima facie correct and valid, and such person shall have the burden of establishing -3- ORDINANCE N0. its incorrectness or invalidity in any action or proceeding in respect thereto Subd. 2. If any portion of a tax imposed by this chapter including penalties thereon is not paid within thirty (30) days after it is required to be _paid, the City. Attorney may institute such legal action as may be necessary to recover the amount due plus interest penalties the costs and disbursements of any action. Subd. 3. Upon a showing of good cause the director may grant an operator one thirty (30) days extension of time within which to file a return and make Raayment of taxes as required by this chapter provided that interest during such period of extension shall be added to the taxes due at the rate of ten (10 %) percent per annum Section 22 -010. PENALTIES Subd. 1. If any tax imposed by this chapter is not paid within the time herein specified for the payment or any extension thereof, there shall be added thereto a specific penalty equal to ten (10 %) percent of the amount remaining unpaid. Subd. 2. In case of any failure to make and file a return within the time prescribed by this chapter unless it is shown that such failure is not due to willful neglect, there shall be added to the tax in addition to the ten (10 %) percent specific penalty provided in subdivision 1 above ten (10 %) percent if the failure is for not more than thirty (30) days with an additional five (5%) percent for each additional thirty (30) days or fraction thereof during which such failure continues not exceeding twenty -five (25 %) percent in the aggregate. If the penalty as computed does not exceed $10 a minimum penalty of $10 shall be assessed The amount so added to any tax shall be collected at the same time and the same manner and as a part of the tax unless the tax has been paid before the discovery of the negligence in which case the amount so added shall be collected in the same manner as the tax. Subd. 3. If any person willfully fails to file any return or make any payment regui,red by this chapter, or willfully files a false or fraudulent return or willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any such a tax or payment thereof, there shall also be imposed as a penalty an amount equal to fifty (501) percent of any tax (less any amounts paid on the basis of such false or fraudulent return) found due for the period to which such return related The penalty imposed by this subdivision shall be collected as part of the tax and shall be in addition to any other penalties provided by this chapter. Subd. 4. All payments received shall be credited first to penalties next to interest. and then to the tax due Subd. 5. The amount of tax not timely paid together with any penalty rovided by this section shall bear interest at the rate of eight (8 %) percent per annum from the time such tax should have been paid until paid Any -interest -4- ORDINANCE NO. and penalty shall be added to the tax and be collected as part thereof. Section 22 -011 ADMINISTRATION OF TAX. The director shall administer and enforce the assessment and collection of the taxes imposed by this chapter. The director shall cause to be prepared blank forms for the returns and other documents reouired by this chapter and shall distribute the same throughout the City and furnish them on application but failure to receive or secure them shall not relieve any person from any obligation required of him under this chapter, unless it can be established that the required forms were not available from the City. Section 22 -012. EXAMINE RECORDS.- The director and those - persons acting on behalf of the director authorized in writing by the director may examine the books, Papers and records of any operator in order to verify the accuracy of any return made or if no return was made to ascertain • s ertain the tax as provided in this chapter... Every such operator is directed and reouired to give to the said director or to his duly authorized agent or employee the means facilities and opportunity for such examinations and investigations as are hereby authorized Section 22 -013 CONTRACT WITH STATE The City Manager is authorized to confer with the Minnesota Commissioner of Taxation to the end that an agreement between the City and the Commissioner of Taxation may be entered into for the purpose of providing for the administration and collection of the taxes imposed by this chapter. Such an agreement shall not become effective until presented to the Council for its approval and when so approved the tax imposed by this chapter shall be collected and administered pursuant to the terms of said agreement. Section 22 -014. VIOLATIONS Any person who shall willfully fail to make a return required by this chapter: or who shall fail to pay the tax after written demand for payment: or who shall fail to remit the taxes collected or an penalty or interest imposed by this chapter after written demand for such payment: or who shall refuse to permit the director or any duly authorized agents or employees to examine the books records and papers under his or her control: or who shall willfully an y p make incom lete false or fraudulent return shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Section 22 -015. USE OF PROCEEDS The ninety -five (95$) percent proceeds obtained from the collection of taxes pursuant to this chapter shall be used in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 477A.018 as the same may be amended from time to time to fund a local convention or tourism bureau for the ur ose of marketing and promoting the City as a tourist or convention center. Section 22 -016. APPEALS Subd, 1_, Any operator aggrieved by any notice order or determination made by the director under this chapter mares file a petition for review of such notice_, order or determination detailing the operator's reasons for contesting the notice, order or determination Theyetition shall contain the name of the -5- ORDINANCE N0, petitioner. the petitioner's address and the location of the lodging subject to the order, notice or determination. Subd. 2. The petition for review shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten (10} days after the notice order or determination for which review is sought has been mailed or served upon the person requesting review. Subd. 3. Unon receipt of the petition the City Manager, or his designee shall set a date for a hearing and give the petitioner at least five (5) dam Prior written notice of the date time and Rlace of the hearing Subd. 4. At the hearing the petitioner shall be given an opportunity to show cause why the notice order or determination should be modified or withdrawn. The petitioner may be represented by counsel of petitioner's choosing at petitioner's own expense Subd. 5. The hearing shall be conducted by the City Manager or his designee, provided only that the person conducting the hearing shall not have participated in the drafting of the order, notice or determination for which review is sought. Subd. 6. The person conducting the hearing shall make written findings of fact and conclusions based upon the applicable sections of this chapter and evidence Presented.- The person conducting the hearing may affirm reverse or modify the notice, order or determination made by the director. Subd. 7. Any decision rendered by the City Manager pursuant to this subdivision may be appealed to the City Council A petitioner seeking to appeal a decision must file a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten (10) days after the decision has been mailed to the petitioner. The matter will thereupon be placed on the Council agenda as soon as is practical The Council shall then review the findings of fact and conclusions to determine whether they were correct. Upon a determination by the Council that findings and conclusions were incorrect. the Council may modify, reverse or affirm the decision of the City Manager or his designee ee uRgn the same standards as set forth in subdivision 6. Section.2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of 1986. Mayor -6- ORDINANCE 110. ATTEST: City Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Underline indicates new matter.) -7- 1 2d MEMORANDUM: TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspectio'h -a , t' )- DATE: July 11, 1986 SUBJECT: Planning and Inspection Department Fee Schedule On the July 14, 1986 City Council agenda is discussion of proposed increases in the fees collected by our department for various permits and applications. Attached are copies of City Council Resolution Nos. 81 -123 and 83-65 which together make up the Planning and Inspection Department fee schedule. We are now in the process of drafting a proposed resolution to amend and update these fees but not all our research is completed on all of the various fees. Hopefully, a proposed new schedule will be available for review and discussion Monday evening. Generally, the proposed fee, increase will be an approximate 25% increase. Cost of living has increased about 27% since 1981 when the current fee schedule was instituted. The most significant increase, much more than 25 %, will be in the charges for building permits. Historically, we have adopted the Uniform Building Code (UBC) recommended fee schedule and our current building permit fees are those contained in the 1979 UBC. We are recommending adopting the schedule recommended by the 1985 UBC. We will be adopting the 1985 UBC later this year as the 'updated State Building Code. That fee schedule is based on building valuation and will amount to increases between 30% and 50% depending upon the category. Also, this schedule recommends collecting an additional plan check fee that is 65% of the permit fee. Currently our plan check fee is 50% of the permit fee. We do not charge a plan check fee for one and two family dwelling (including townhouses) permits. The City Council may want to consider whether to continue with this policy or charge a plan check on all building permits. The following is a list showing comparison of the current and proposed building permit fees based on certain permit valuations: Current Fee Proposed Fee Valuation (1979 UBC) (1985 UBC) $ 500 $ 10.00 $ 15.00 1,000 17.50 25.00 2,000 32.50 45.00 10,000 85.50 117.00 25,000 170.50 252.00 50,000 283.00 414.50 75,000 358.00 527.00 100,000 433.00 639.50 500,000 1,433.00 2,039.50 1,000,000 2 3,539.50 Memo to Gerald G. Splinter Page 2 July 11, 1986 We are also proposing that the fees for Planning Commission applications be increased as follows: Type Existing Fee Proposed Fee Rezoning $ 175 $350 Site & Building 100 250 Plan Preliminary Plat 50 + 5 /lot 100 Variance 50 50 Special Use Permit 50 50 Extension of Special 25 25 Use Permit Appeal 25 50 Determination 25 50 Regarding sign permit fees, we recommend that the schedule be modified to provide a new category of sign, that being signs from 0 to 5 sq. ft. and that a permit fee of $10.00 be charged. This would affect primarily home occupation sign permits that currently cost $25.00. The most common complaint is that the permit fee is exorbitant in comparison to the cost of the sign. This may discourage some from taking a permit for these signs, but it does not, however, necessarily discourage them from putting up these signs. It is believed that a lower charge of $10.00 will not be a hindrance to obtaining a permit and lead to better enforcement and control of home occupation signs. The recommended fee for other sign permits is $30.00 for signs between 5 sq. ft. and 50 sq. ft. in area plus $12.50 for each additional 50 sq. ft. over 50 sq. ft. Finally we are recommending that administrative land use permits be added to the department fee schedule. This would involve an ordinance amendment to authorize these fees to be set by City Council resolution. Currently the permit charges are $2.00 for a ten day promotional type permit and $5.00 for a thirty week garden center permit. The fees have remained unchanged since prior to 1968. It is recommended that the new fees be $10.00 for a ten day promotional permit and $25.00 for a thirty week garden center permit, a five fold increase in these fees. As indicated previously, we hope to have other recommended fees for plumbing, mechanical and electrical permits by Monday evening, if possible, and a final format for the Council's consideration. We are considering an effective date for these new fees of Monday, September 29, 1986. im Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 83 -65 RESOLUTION AMENDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 81 -123 ESTABLISHING FLOOD PLAIN USE PERMIT FEES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center adopted Resolution No. 81 -123 on June 8, 1981 establishing a fee schedule for various fees collected by the Planning and Inspection Department; and WHEREAS, on January 25, 1982 the City Council adopted a Flood Plain Manage- ment Ordinance which requires the issuance of a "Use Permit" for various activities conducted within the Flood Plain; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate to establish a permit fee for Flood Plain Use Permits to offset the costs to the City for the administration, enforcement and inspection of said use permits; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved an Ordinance Amendment authorizing a Flood Plain Use Permit fee to be established by City Council Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to amend City Council Resolution No. 81 -123 by adding the following to the Planning and Inspection Department Fee Schedule: Flood Plain Use Permit Fees Fee Up to 10,000 sq. ft. $10.00 From 10,000 sq. ft. to 1 acre $1.00 /1,000 sq. ft. From 1 acre to 5 -acres $20.00 /acre Over 5 acres $15.00 /acre BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the.above fees shall become effective o April 23, 1983. April 11, 1983 q Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motVnfor the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Rich Theis and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof; Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka,,Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and the following voted against the same; none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Gene Lhatka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 81 -123 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE FOR PLANNING AND INSPECTION DEPARTMENT FEES WHEREAS, Chapters 3, 15, 34, and 35 of the City Ordinances establishes fees to be charged for building permits, plumbing permits, electrical system permits, mechanical system permits, sign permits, as well as various Planning Commission fees; and ' WHEREAS, these fees are collected by the Planning and Inspection Department as a part of the application process; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it would be less cumber- some and a better method of ensuring a uniform fee structure to set forth.these fees in a single fee schedule; and WHEREAS, Chapters 3, 15, 34, and 35 of the City Ordinances have been amended to authorize the setting of various fees by City Council resolution rather than by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend Resolution No. 80 -214, in part, to increase the fees charged for sewer or water connections and sewer or water disconnections. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to adopt the following fee schedules; PLANNING AND INSPECTION DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE 1. ' Building Permit Fees Building permit fees shall be based on the valuation of each building. The building valuation shall.be computed using the up -to -date average construction cost per square foot established from time to time by the State Building Inspector. Valuation Fee $ 500.00 $ 10.00 11000.00 17.50 2,000.00 32.50 10,000.00 80.50 25,000 00 170.50 50,000.00 283.00 75,000.00 0.0 O 358.00 100,000.00 433.00 500,000.00 1,433.00 11000,000.00 2,683.00 Also, 2 the amount of permit fee is collected for Plan -Check fee on all plans except one and two family residences (including townhouses as one family residences). RESOLUTION NO. 81 -123 2. Plumbing Permit Fees Plumbing permit fees shall be computed on the basis of the number of plumbing fixtures and devices and of the type of system or plumbing work as set forth below. A plumbing fixture is defined as a device intended to be connected to the plumbing system, such as any sink bath tub, or any other such devices. Fee (a) Minimum Fee $ 15.00 (b) Plumbing fixtures installed 7.50 (c) Plumbing fixture opening for future installation _5.00 (d) Catch basin installed .12.50 (e) Water heater installed 7.50 (f) Ground run to building 12.50 (g) Rainwater leader 7.50 (h) Installation of water treating or filter device 10.00 (i) Potable water well drilling 20.00 (j) Irrigation connection 20.00 (k) Sewer or Water connection * 25.60 /conn. (1) Sewer or Water disconnection * 25.00 /disconn. (m) Repair or alteration of existing plumbing or water 3% of estimated distribution system — cost (n) New single family dwelling plumbing system (including 45.00 fixtures, devices, openings, and water piping) (o) Fire Suppression Systems Standpipes, 1 -3 floors 25.00 Each additional floor 3.00 Automatic Sprinklers, 1st floor 50.00 Each additional floor 15.00 (P) A plumbing permit shall be required for gas piping; the permit fees are set forth below. (Fees for gas fitting of appliances and heating systems are set forth under Mechanical System Permit Fees contained in this schedule. Up to 2 -inch diameter pipe Fee 1 -3 openings 4.50 Each additional opening 2.00 * Amends Resolution No. 80 -214 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -12 Plumbing Permit Fees continued Fee 2 -inch and over diameter pipe 1 -3 openings 12.50 Each additional opening 2.50 3. Electrical System Permit Fees Electrical system permit fees shall be calculated and paid according to the following: Fee (a) Minimum Permit 15.00 (b) Services, changes of services, temporary services, additions, alterations or repairs on either primary or secondary services shall be computed separately as indicated below.: In the case of services in excess of 230 volts, the following fee amounts shall be doubled. O to and including 60 amp capacity 6.00 61 to and including 100 amp capacity 7,50 101 to and including 200 amp capcity 9.00 For each additional 100 amp capacity or fraction thereof 4.00 (c) The fee for circuits installation of, additions to, alterations of, or repairs of each circuit or sub - feeder shall be computed ' separately, including circuits fed from sub - feeders and in- cluding the equipment served, except as provided for in items (d) through M. In the case of services in excess of 230 volts, the following fee amounts shall be doubled. 0 to and including 30 amp capacity (maximum number of 0 to 30 amp in any one cabinet) 2.00 31 to and including 100 amp capacity .4.00 For each additional 100 amp capacity or fraction thereof 1.50 (d) New single family dwelling electrical system (including service, feeders, circuits, fixtures and equipment) 45.00 (e) The fee on a new multiple family dwelling building shall be $20.00 per dwelling.unit for the first 20 units and $10.00 per dwelling unit for the balance of the units. (f) In addition to other fees, all transformers and generators for light, heat, and power shall be computed separately at $5.00 per unit plus $..30 per KVA up to and including 100 KVA and $.30 per KVA for 101 KVA and over. The maximum fee for any transformer or generator in this category shall be $50.00. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -12 Electrical Permit-Fees-continued (g) In addition to other fees, all transformers for signs and outline light- ing shall be computed at $7.50 for the first 500 KVA or fraction thereof per unit, plus $.25 for each 100 VA or fraction thereof in excess of 500 VA per unit. (h) In addition to other fees, (except dwellings) remote control, signal circuits of less than 50 volts shall be computed at $6.00 per each ten openings or devices of each system plus $.75 for each additional ten or fraction thereof. (i) For special inspections or services, or for reinspections of improper work, the Building Official may impose such additional charges as are reasonably related to the cost of providing the service. 4. Mechanical System Permit Fees Mechanical system permit fees shall be calculated and collected according to .the following: (a) Installation, alteration, reconstruction, or repair of any heating, ventilating, comfort cooling, or refrigeration equipment, shall be computed on the basis of the estimated cost of the proposed work except as herein provided. Fee Up to and including $500 $ 00 Over $500, but not over $50,000 2% of valuation Over $50;000 1% of valuation (b) A mechanical permit shall be required for gas pipe fitting for connection to any gas burning device, except as herein provided; the fees are set forth below. (Fees for gas piping are additional and are set forth under Plumbing System Permit Fees contained in this schedule). The appropriate fee for gas water heaters shall be applied to the plumbing permit rather than a mechanical permit. The permit fee for installing each gas stove, range, water heater, process burner, or similar gas burning device not used in connection with a heating system shall be: Input (B.T.U'S) Fee Not exceeding 99,999 $ 10.00 100,000 - 199,999 15.00 200,000 - 399,999 27.00 400,000 -- 599,999 38.00 600,000 - 999,999 50.00 Over 999,999 - use gas burner /heating system schedule below. The permit fee for installing gas burners and fittings for use in con- nection with a heating system shall be: RESOLUTION NO. 81 -123 Mechanical System Permit Fees continued Input (B.T.U'S Fee Up to 999,999 - use gas appliance /nonheating schedule above. 1,000,000 - 2,499,999 $ 84.00 2,500,000 - 9,999,999 100.00 10,000,000 - 49,999,999 144.00 50,000,000 - 74,999,999 184.00 75,000,000 and over 244.00 (c) A mechanical permit shall be required for the installation, for the removal, and for the replacement of any in- ground or above- ground tanks or vessels and related piping used for the storage of gaseous or liquid fuels or chemicals. Permit fees shall be: Fee Above- ground new installation $ 30.00 In- ground new installation 40.00 Above- ground removal 20.00 In- ground removal 30.00 Replace like tank to existing system 30.00 (d) It is not intended that permits shall be required for portable heating, ventilating, comfort cooling, or refrigeration equipment, nor for the replacement of any component part or assembly of an appliance which does not alter its original approval and which complies with other applicable requirements of the Building Code. S. Sign Permit Fees Sign permit fees shall be collected before issuance of any sign permit required under the provisions of the Sign Ordinance and shall be calculated according to the following: (a) The fee for any permanent freestanding or non - freestanding sign shall be $25.00.for the first fifty (50) square feet of gross area-tor.'. - fraction thereof and $10.00 for each additional fifty'(:50) square feet of gross area or fraction thereof. (b) The fee for permits for the installation of any electrical wiring for any sign shall conform to the electrical system fee schedule contained herein. 6. Planning Commission Fees Planning Commission fees shall be submitted at the time applications are executed according to the following; (a) Rezonings Fee $ 175.00 (b) Site and Building Plans 100.00 (c) Preliminary Plat 50.00 plus (d) Variance 5.00 each lot 50.00 (e) Special Use Permit 50.00 (f) Extension of Special Use Permit 25.00 (9) Appeal 25.00 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -123 Planning Commission Fees continued In addition to the above fees, the applicant shall sign an agreement, on forms provided by the City, to pay the cost of all engineering, planning and legal consulting expenses incurred by the City in processing the above applications. BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED that the above schedule of Planning and Inspection Department Fees shall become effective on June 28, 1981. _June 8-1981 Date K ay — or ATTEST: �L.C- C s C erk The motion for the adoption of the foregoi resolution was duly seconded by member B ill Fignar and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof Mayor Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lohtka, and celii- saotti and the following voted against the same; none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RESOLUTION AMENDING THE ' SCHEDULE FOR PLANNING AND INSPECTION DEPARTMENT FEES WHEREAS, Chapters 3, 15, 34, and 35 of the City Ordinances require the payment of fees for building permits, plumbing permits, electrical system permits, mechanical system permits, sign permits, Planning Commission applications, flood plain use permits, and administrative land use permits; and WHEREAS, Chapters 3, 15, 34 and 35 of the City Ordinances further authorize the setting of various fees by City Council resolution; and WHEREAS, City Council Resolution Nos. 81 -123 (adopted 6/8/81) and 83-65 (adopted 4/11 /83) together comprise a schedule of fees collected by the Planning and Inspection,Department; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it appropriate to modify and update the fees contained in said resolutions and to adopt a new fee schedule. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center to adopt the following fee schedule: PLANNING AND INSPECTION DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE 1. Building Permit Fees Building permit fees shall be based on the valuation of each 'building. The building valuation shall be computed using the up -to -date average construction cost per square foot established from time to time by the State Building Inspector. Valuation Fee $1.00 to $500.00 $15.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $15.00 for the first $500.00 plus $2.00 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $45.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $9.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $252.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus $6.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $414.50 for the first $50,000.00 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $639.50 for the first $100,000.00 plus $3.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof RESOLUTION N0. • Building Permit Fees Continued $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $2039.50 for the first $500,000.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $3539.50 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Also, a Plan -Check fee of 65% of the amount of the permit fee is collected except for one and two family residences (including townhouses as on family residences). 2. Plumbing Permit Fees Plumbing permit fees shall be computed on the basis of the number of plumbing fixtures and devices and of the type of system or plumbing work as set forth below. A plumbing fixture is defined as a device intended to be connected to the plumbing system, such as any sink, bathtub, or any other such devices. Fee (a) Minimum Fee $ 18.75 (b) Plumbing fixtures installed 10.00 • (c) Plumbing fixture opening for future installation 6.25 (d) Catch basin installed 15.00 (e) Water heater installed 10.00 (f) Ground run to building 15.00 (g) Rainwater leader 10.00 (h) Installation of water treating or filter device 12.50 (i) Potable water well drilling 25.00 (j) Irrigation connection 25.00 (k) Sewer dr Water connection 31.25 /corn. (1) Sewer or Water disconnection 31.25 /cone. (m) Repair or alteration of existing plumbing or water 3% of distribution system estimated cost (n) New single family dwelling plumbing system (including 55.00 fixtures, devices, openings, and water piping) RESOLUTION NO. Plumbing Permit Fees Continued (o) Fire Suppression Systems Standpipes, 1 -3 floors 30.00 Each additional floor 3.75 Automatic Sprinklers, 1st floor 62.50 Each additional floor 18.75 (p) A plumbing permit shall be required for gas piping; the permit fees are set forth below. (Fees for gas fitting of appliances and heating systems are set forth under Mechanical System Permit Fees contained in this schedule. Up to 2 -inch diameter pipe 1 -3 openings 5.75 Each additional opening 2.50 2 -inch and over diameter pipe 1 -3 openings 15.00 Each additional opening 3.25 3. Electrical System Permit Fees Electrical system permit fees shall be calculated and paid according to the following: • Fee (a) Minimum Permit 18.75 (b) Services changes of services, temporary services additions, alterations or repairs on either primary or secondary services shall be computed separately as indicated below. In the case of services in excess of 250 volts, the following fee amounts shall be doubled. 0 to and including 60 amp capacity 7.50 61 to and including 100 amp capacity 10.00 101 to and including 200 amp capacity 12.00 For each additional 100 amp capacity or fraction thereof 5.00 (c) The fee'for circuits installation of, additions to, alterations of, or repairs of each circuit or sub- feeder shall be computed separately, including circuits fed from sub- feeders and including the equipment served, except as provided for in items (d) through (h). In the case of services of 250 volts, the following fee amounts shall be doubled. 0 to and including 30 amp capacity (maximum number of 0 to 30 amp in any one cabinet) 2.50 RESOLUTION NO. Electrical Permit Fees Contined 31 to and including 100 amp capacity 5.00 For each additional 100 amp capacity or fraction thereof 2.00 (d) New single family dwelling electrical system (including 55.00 service, feeders, circuits, fixtures and equipment) (e) The fee on a new multiple family dwelling building shall be $25.00 per dwelling unit for the first 20units and $12.50 per dwelling unit for the balance of the units.the units. (f) In addition to other fees, each permit for wiring, installing and connecting transformers and generators for light, heat and power shall be computed separately 6per unit for the first 25 KVA or fraction P Y at $ .25 P thereof; plus $.40 for each KVA or fraction thereof, in excess of 25 KVA, but not exceeding 200 KVA; plus $.40 for each 10 KVA in in excess of 200 KVA. (g) In addition to other fees, all transformers for signs and outline lighting shall be computed at $10.00 for the first 500 VA or fraction thereof per unit, plus $.30 for each 100 VA or fraction thereof in excess of 500 VA. (h) In addition to other fees, (except dwellings) remote control, signal circuits of less than 50 volts shall be computed at $7.50 per each ten openings or devices of each system plus $1.00 for each additional ten or fraction thereof. • (i) For special inspections or services, or for reinspections -of improper work, the Building Official may impose such additional charges as are reasonably related to the cost of providing the service. 4. Mechanical System Permit Fees Mechanical system permit fees shall be calculated and collected according to the following: (a) Installation, alteration, reconstruction, or repair of any heating, ventilating, comfort cooling, or refrigeration equipment, shall be computed on the basis of the estimated cost of the proposed work except as herein provided. Fee Up to and including $500 $12.50 Over $500, but not over $50,000 2% of valuation Over $50,000 1% of valuation (b) A mechanical permit shall be required for gas pipe fitting for connection to any gas burning device, except as herein provided; the fees are set forth below. (Fees for gas piping are additional and are set forth under Plumbing System Permit Fees contained in this schedule). The appropriate fee for gas water heaters shall be applied to the plumbing permit rather than a mechanical permit. Y RESOLUTION NO. Mechanical Permit Fees Continued The permit fee for installing each gas stove, range, water heater, process burner, or similar gas burning device not used in connection to a heating system shall be: Input (B.T.U'S) Fee Not exceeding 99,999 $12.50 100,000 - 199,999 18.75 200,000 399,999 33.75 400 599,999 47.50 600,000 - 999,999 62.50 Over 999,999 - use gas burner /heating system schedule below. The permit fee for installing gas burners and fittings for use in connection with a heating system shall be: Input (B.T.U'S) Up to 999,999 - use gas appliance /nonheating schedule above, 1,000,000 - 2,499,999 $105.00 2,500,000 - 9,999,999 125.00 10,000,000 - 49,999,999 180.00 50,000,000 - 74,999,999 230.00 75,000,000 and over 305-00 . (c) A mechanical permit shall be required for the installation, for the removal, and for the replacement of any in ground or above- ground tanks or vessels and related piping used for the storage of gaseous or liquid fuels or chemicals. Permit fees shall be: Above- ground new installation $37.50 In- ground new installation 50.00 Above- ground removal 25.00 In- ground removal 37.50 Replace like tank to existing system 37.50 (d) It is not intended that permits shall be required for portable heating, ventilating, comfort cooling, or refrigeration equipment, nor for the replacement of any component part or assembly of an appliance which does not alter its original approval and which complies with other applicable requirements of the Building Code. 5. Sign Permit Fees Sign permit fees shall be collected before issuance of any sign permit required under the provision of the Sign Ordinance and shall be calculated according to the following: (a) The fee for any permanent freestanding or non - freestanding sign 5 sq. ft . in area or less shall be $10.00. RESOLUTION N0. Sign Permit Fees Continued (b) The fee for any permanent freestanding or non - freestanding sign over 5 sq . ft. in area shall be $30.00 for the first fifty (50) square feet of gross area or fraction thereof and $12.50 for each additional fifty (50)square feet of gross area or fraction thereof . (c) The fee for permits for the installation of any electrical wiring for any sign shall conform to the electrical system fee schedule contained herein. 6. Planning Commission Fees Planning Commission fees shall be collected at the time applications are executed according to the following: Fee (a) Rezonings $350.00 (b) Site and Building Plans 250.00 (c) Preliminary Plat 100.00 (d) Variance 50.00 (e) Special Use Permit 50.00 (f) Extension of Special Use Permit 25.00 (g) Appeal 50.00 (h) Determination 50.00 In addition to the above fees, the applicant shall sign an agreement, on forms Provided by the City, to pay the cost of all engineering, planning and legal consulting expenses incurred by the City in processing the above applications. 7. Administrative Land Use Permit Fees Administrative Land Use Permit fees for temporary activity shall be collected before the issuance of any such permit required under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance according to the following: (a) Church functions, civic functions, charities, $10 /10 days carnivals, etc. (b) Off -site signs for civic functions or community $10/10 days events per location (c) Out -of -door nursery and garden center sales and $25/30 weeks displays (d) Miscellaneous out -of -door sales, displays or $10/10 days promotional events (e) Miscellaneous out -of -door sales, displays or $10/30 days promotional events for gasoline service stations (f) Car wash fund raisers $10 /10 days t l RESOLUTION N0. 8. Flood Plain Use Permit Fees Flood Plain Use Permit Fees shall be collected before the issuance of an flood lood plain use permit required under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and shall be calculated according to the following: Up to 10,000 sq. ft. $12.50 From 10,000 sq. ft. to 1 acre $1.25/1,000 sq. ft From 1 acre to 5 acres $25.00 /acre Over 5 acres $18.75 /acre BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above schedule of Planning and Inspection Department Fees shall become effective on Monday, September 29, 1986. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof; and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ly Licenses to be approved by the City Council on July 14, 1986: AMUSEMENT DEVICE - OPERATOR Beacon Bowl 6525 Lyndale Avenue North Chuck Wagon Inn 5720 Morgan Avenue North Davanni's 5937 Summit Drive Green Mill Inn Inc. 5540 Brooklyn Boulevard Holiday nn Y 1501 Freeway Boulevard MTC 6845 Shingle Creek Pkwy. Scoreboard Pizza 6816 Humboldt Avenue North T. Wrights 5800 Shingle Creek Pkwy. _C of of Police AMUSEMENT DEVICE - VENDOR Theisen Vending Company 3804 Nicollet Avenue S. Twin City Novelty Co. 9549 Penn Avenue South C ief of Police CIGARETTE LICENSE Iten Chevrolet 6701 Brooklyn Boulevard City Clerk FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE Target 6100 Shingle Creek Pkwy. , 4 - jla"24.L Sanitarian GARBAGE HAULERS VEHICLE LICENSE - Bergstrom Trucking 5860 73rd Avenue North Hilger Transfer Inc. 8550 Zachary Lane Midwest Grease Buyers, Inc. P. 0. Box 26 Peterson Brothers Sanitation, Inc. 18605 Lake George Blvd. Rapid Way Disposal 685 123rd Avenue NW Robbinsdale Transfer Inc. 5232 Hanson Court Sanitarian ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE Brooklyn Center Babe Ruth 6401 Kyle Avenue North Brooklyn Center Jaycees 1316 68th Lane Brooklyn Center Park & Recreation 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy. St. Alphonsus Fun Fair 7025 Halifax Avenue North Sanitarian MECHANICAL SYSTEMS LICENSE Flare Heating and Air Cond. Inc. 664 Mendelssohn Avenue N. General Sheet Metal Corp. 2330 Louisiana Avenue N. b Grendahl Mechanical, Inc. Box 208 Buil g Official NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE Iten Chevrolet 6701 Brooklyn Boulevard _ Sanitarian AftPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE Iten Chevrolet 6701 Brooklyn Boulevard �• Sanitarian SIGN HANGERS LICENSE _DeMars Sign Company 4040 Marshall Street NE Buil g Official TAXI CAB LICENSE Yellow Taxi Service Corp. 3555 5th Avenue South Li ief of Police TEMPORARY ON -SALE NON INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE St. Alphonsus Fun Fair 7025 Halifax Avenue N. ief of Police GENERAL APPROVAL: 9 D. K. keeks, City Clerk