Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011 03-17 PCP PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MARCH 17, 2011 STUDY SESSION 1. Call to Order: 7:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes — March 10, 2011 4. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 5. Todd Shaw for Precision Machine, Inc. 2011 -006 Planned Unit Development Approval to rezone 1700 Freeway Boulevard from 1 -1 (Industrial) to PUD /1 -1 (Planned Unit Development/Industrial) 6. Loren Van Der Slik 2011 -004 Preliminary Plat Approval of Shingle Creek Crossing, the replat of Brookdale properties into four lots and two outlots to facilitate Phase I of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. 7. Resolution of the Brooklyn Center Planning and Zoning Commission Concerning Certain Redevelopment Project Area and Tax Increment Financing Proposals of the City of Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Center and the Economic Development Authority Development Authority in and For the City of Brooklyn Center. 8. Other Business: a. Presentation by the Gatlin Development Company Design Team and review of the Shingle Creek Architectural Guidelines and Standards. b. Presentation by the Gatlin Development Company Design Team and review of the Phase I internal streetscaping and lighting for the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. 9. Continued Discussion Items: Review of the 2011 Community Development and Planning Activities. Continued review of Council Goals and the 2010 Planning Commission agendas in preparation for the April 6 th Joint Council /Commission meeting. Educational opportunities offered through the Government Training Seminar. Your Role as Planning Commission Member 10. Other Business Article from Urbanland —'The Future of the Strip ?' 11. Adjournment Application Filed on 2 -18 -10 City Council Action Should Be Taken By 4 -19 -10 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2011 -006 Applicant: Todd Shaw on behalf of Precision Incorporated Location: Northeast Quadrant of Freeway Boulevard and James Avenue North (1700 Freeway Boulevard) Request: Rezoning Approval to Establish a PUD to Facilitate an Expansion of the Parking Lot and Repurposing of this Industrial Building from Warehousing to Manufacturing The applicant, Todd Shaw, on behalf of Precision, Inc. is seeking to rezone Lot 1, Block 1, Interchange Addition, from I -1 to PUD /I -1 as part of the redevelopment/renovation plans for this existing 45,000 sq. ft. industrial building and expansion of its parking lot. BACKGROUND INFORMATION On January 27, 2011, the Planning Commission considered the potential relocation of an existing Brooklyn Center manufacturing use into the vacant industrial building at 1700 Freeway Boulevard and the possible use of the Planned Unit Development ordinance to establish flexibility in allowing the expansion of the existing one -way angled parking (accessed from Freeway Boulevard) to a double sided parking lot with a relocation of the driveway unto James Avenue. The discussion at that time included considerations to preserving the existing boulevard trees and the possible use of parking lot materials that would not increase the rate of storm water runoff. On February 17, 2011, the Planning Commission unanimously moved to recommend conceptual approval which allowed an expansion of the parking lot that encroached upon the standard 15 foot front yard setback with the use of rain gardens within the James Avenue North/ boulevard to address storm water runoff. ZONING This site is zoned I -1 (Industrial Park) and is indentified on the City's Comprehensive Plan as part of the City's 694 industrial area. This 2.77 acre site was developed in 1969 as part of an industrial development, known as Freeway Commerce Center. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS/ STANDARDS Section 35 -355 of the Zoning Ordinance provides for Planned Unit Developments (PUD) to promote flexibility in land development and redevelopment, preserve aesthetically significant and environmentally sensitive site features, conserves energy and ensures a high quality of design. 3 -17 -11 Page 1 The proposed use of a PUD allows the use of perimeter setback standards to provide green and open space from the existing neighborhood, flexibility in the location of interior lot lines, parking and structured parking setbacks, and the ability to deviate from the dedication of the standard side yard drainage and utility easements. The following minimum I -1 development standard is being requested to be modified to facilitate the expansion of the parking lot: • Parking setback from James Avenue North —15 ft. to approximately 6 ft. The parking ratio used is for industry and wholesale buildings and is one space for each two employees on a major shift or one per 800 sq. ft. of gross building area, whichever is greater. The ordinance requirement for this building is 56 parking stalls. PUD APPLICATION AND REVIEW PROCESS The PUD provisions require that a development include sufficient information and details which allows the evaluation of the plans to address the following criteria: 1. Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes and intent of the PUD ordinances. 2. Consistency of the Plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impact of the Plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located. 4. The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, buffering, and landscaping. Attached for you review is a copy of development plan/site plan which illustrates the proposed expansion of the parking lot and relocation of the Freeway Boulevard entrance driveway to James Avenue. The plan illustrates how a maximum of 123 parking stalls could be accommodated on the lot, assuming a conversion of a significant portion of the rear loading area is used for parking. Precision Incorporated is currently operating as a tenant in approximately 20,000 sq. ft. of the 1800 Freeway Boulevard industrial building. A meeting with the applicant indicates that they have been a Brooklyn Center business for approximately 50 years during which their Transformer Manufacturing business has grown to 100 employees and has approximately $20M in production. They currently operate two shifts and believe that their business is well positioned to more than double in the foreseeable future. The building at 1700 Freeway Boulevard is a 45,000 sq.ft. building and with the expanded parking will facilitate their needs and desire to stay and grow in the City of Brooklyn Center. 3 -17 -11 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that a motion be made to approve Planning Commission Application No. 2011 -006 by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -03 subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of a PUD development agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. 2. Approval of a grading and planting plan for the rain gardens by the City Engineer. 3. Closure of the driveway entrance unto Freeway Boulevard and approval of a driveway permit for the James Ave. I 3 -17 -11 Page 3 67TH AVE N IWI sm saw Ous 22 c a A T y ti 6640 6534 � �` ' _ Olt z cn w w law 16M 6501 ----------- L -------------- FREEWAY BLVD 65TH AVE N 6443 w 6445 6 t6ol 15 u- � t t � 6431 . .. ............ S 6440 .......... ----- --- la "25 N, I 6410 IR 6412 6413 6400 6401 64TH ; AVE N rk� 1701 F;2 3 4'x444 1 1 am i Gul Planning Commission Application No. 2011-006 if it 1 w J�T ONI S 1mf-i is 'HINNVI' I]ISM-31 OVI43VJ0 IYIN . .................. . . ... ..... ---------- omlm III \ ;\ \ \I \ \ Ell ....... . .. N . ... .. . ...... N X N + 17 - � '� I � 1 \ �', �, viz" � � \\ � � .� O'k Ur 1� UX" U 1 i \ � �� 3 .... ... ...._.. ......... am --_. . . ... . .... .... . .... .... .... .... _... . ............. IE N = k National Coordinators of ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys '6 'm 537 9.1h c I= ' tll 44-IM ph— f., am PRECISION INC 1700 Freeway Blvd. Minr MP N' .............. k rr a x � — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - -- 6 e , EAWM ' err nEiwmc aesnnau aeabro 0 Wmam m C r {• w-r mP re � I c G r m L m-cmt cm OJWMPaa } NO 3 r e r-r rase mm" near. ► I .. nee"F*M. m neerwwaac � cmcmro I Zf—T --1141 wm &wp J O ne "r nuns aeaemrav r : } eaamcuVaE Q6T01AL R CN 4 cp an ca r PAiJCHGSiALLB BIIILDIGIWERG01151DERAlIQt eroez a x ow Accm V" 0'2 mususm aeeeanero a -- 4 n►a - odmo FREEWAY 5LVD. 51TE PLAN DRPORATED Dapolls, MN 55430 :? SITE / BUILDING INFORMATION STE AREA • COU 6F. (1.10 AM) BIIn M AREA • 40, SF. OWER OCOPW • 33!067 6F. SO LEASE • 1,141 SF. OWER 0=P* CY • 33^7 AF. j MA11FA01URPlfe • 11;016 6F. OFFICE *0 a"OW . 3036 5F. M/NFAOTIP11Ci ' � 1: 500 SF) • 50 STALLS ml OFFICE AREA !� 1 1000 SF) • 65 STALLS PAWM REaIm • Is 6TALLS 1 PAWW PRNM • 26 STALLS 1 (TYPICX STALL SHOW IS 7 x n' -6' • OvLmuwj) ai I rarwtew�at twxwt �� >:� 5 v erwa� ea ii wao aa. car�cnox � �� J * \— AwarcwnA+s awaceser Nim-A t 6 nrrrKa 1llew1.Y0 Met CA1et'1L1R 1®ft MMl0ale0tE rYlell t1MaaD Ve81d elmlU mwoa Mew Alm N N (A%M p r man" ME I � r coca m K%n Hee m i n er�suata C r MOM ietew$I= V/ aartatswxr ("Wm" C e � * neutt�c i �ro mo"aw 6raRn 6EUER nA3rWOLE C M" c000 r Haw ert atweear ae carcH eASr� 9 IWaatDOOM LOS &vN MW � m a J61 L l+ STORM 5EWt MANHOLE O a� OR CATCH SASH r roar, ni w xtatnAae � rrantewu xiaeetwa owengrw6= 6waOlra4 Ml W 04ral1 Mltea 00KOHNOMM►TwaeatTtalm a rte CeWML ArxlHtMA*A0M=ff O tart FoMA MwOtat9r AOn 1 TYPICAL RAIN GARDEN DETAIL A -I WT To WC ALE PRECISION INCORPORATED 1700 Freeway Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55430 a ul 5TY -1 Vt' I i ! O 71F.I0 W 304 Ur SITE / BUILDING INFORMATION 9 -,' k SITE ARIA = 120,913 SF. (7.18 ACRES) 4 - - - - -- — - -- BUILDNG AREA = 40,5046F. CIM OOQPED • 33Ob2 SF. SUB LEASE =1,442 SF. - - - - -- �' S OU.FgR000IPANCY • 33062 BE D ❑ 4 I EaSaslt j MANJFACNRMG • 27p76 SF. ACM OFFICE AND SUPPORT = 110% SF. P" I ImB fiTP OF 3Gi 3l FAWM c mcm TO RAN GAimBI c i MAHFACn1PoNG (. I :500 6FJ SFJ 65 = 50 VALLS - 4• W - 66' - r CffICE AREA h 4 :1000 = STALLS C PAWM REQUIRED - 115 6TALLS 0 I } PAWW PIRDMED • 126 STALLS 3 n'i• m-W n'-6• .e' I (TYPICAL STALL S M 16 9'x n' -b' OVERM") co 0 � m U Oz 6 > q PFErASr talc > � F � arE6(maa Eo 404 4W-a o A N"M Eb6T. 6 EA�'130 L Y P. arm AD PAM I � z � _ PFELI6T Cal- a o RAN GNaB! T 0 OM(IYP CF 4) I €o °_ re' MNMM 6DiN 30 °9y 2 I 1 FOR RANGAWBI BORQT o$ 8 1Y}WT I c 6 _ E S �9 TRAFRO C Y bYVKfD N 81N Ta=BOL T WP 60L 6 I FE -CATC= CQPACIION L �� aM"OFv J _ g tcf &WAW,a %MYAM.* � � .. (rm"j P1.u+� �_ $ CN 4 cP arm cvr 126 TOTAL COAR6E FLi@lAGffE(•1TE L s ILTdCrsb JAE6 AMEN PAfKNG 6TALL6 NM FNY/W AREft U1EfRIlARl RµppTBPfiC.3ImTU ' W 15a N mw MANGaD VwAmmlow i ✓'.� ;v' aLMEF6R001 C8mf6£FM 4• COINIGAT® FGLYEMBE ON BUU DINCf UIOER CQISMIRATIM I F Q ORANKE 1 ENG W 6T= Or1DOF 7PEG 3t1N n00 FREEIUAT BLw. > GaDal t i * PCOW I'KA6T &:tlSIMT OR � 6raa+EeQt ^ SPACE AT } armcv a TO B6R Y ff",OF 11 SEUER MANHOLE # 8 RAN + V – – – – – – po omDaL100D 416H OGONaPIN:HrlY OR CATCH BASH SJ LO.INEN NOETNIOCE ACCBt6 RAP PAW ILLON O.SRa Q °7 P FXp11Y L – STOW SEIUER MANHOLE OR coral BaSN a) — w 1' 3• FUrA NN W Ot. FatPIAV5 4' POTA MN.G4 -MMR SON ' DR411RE dV 6000 GALL4NF0f6,MN W 0r.FORfflM FREEWAY BLVD. * PaM CRWgA" N Cmm'cUTKN6RK11A6ADMMff TO SITE PLAN r1 TYPICAL RAIN GARDEN DETAIL m, 3m' A - NOT Ta 6uLE r Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -03 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2011 -006 SUBMITTED BY TODD SHAW FOR PRECISION MACHINE, INC WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2011 -006 submitted by Todd Shaw for Precision Machine, Inc. proposes rezoning from I -1 (Industrial Park) to PUD/I -1 (Planned Unit Development/Industrial Park) of a 2.77 acre lot; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends the rezoning of the above mentioned property and renovation and repurposing of a 45,000 sq.ft. industrial/warehouse building and expansion of its parking lot; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on March 17, 2011 when a staff report and public testimony regarding the rezoning and development plan were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit Development ordinance contained in Section 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2011 -006 submitted by Todd Shaw for Prevision Machine, Inc. be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The Planned Unit Development is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the Planned Unit Development Rezoning is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with ordinance standards except for the parking setback along James Avenue. These 1 modifications from the I -1 standards are justified on the basis of the development being an appropriate renovation and industrial use for this area and that they are offset or mitigated by the public safety improvements of the closure of the Freeway Boulevard access and installation of rain gardens in the remaining boulevard of James Ave. 4. The Planned Unit Development proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 5. The Planned Unit Development proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this development can be considered an asset to the community. 6. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating rezonings as contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2011 -006 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. Execution of a PUD development agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. 2. Approval of a grading and planting plan for the rain gardens by the City Engineer. 3. Closure of the driveway entrance unto Freeway Boulevard and approval of a driveway permit for the James Avenue. Date Chair ATTEST Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof- and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 2 Application Filed on 2 -11 -11 City Council Action Should Be Taken 4 -12 -11 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2011 -004 Applicant: Loren Van Der Slik on behalf of Gatlin Development Company Location: Brookdale Mall Properties (Excluding Sears, Kohl's & Midas) Request: Preliminary Plat of Shingle Creek Crossing The Gatlin Development Company is requesting Preliminary Plat approval of Shingle Creek Crossing which involves the replating of the Brookdale Mall properties, excluding the Sears, Midas, and Kohl's parcels, into four lots and two outlots as part of the first phase improvements and development of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. Lot 1, Block 1, is a 24.31 acre site which contains the portion of the existing Mall area that will be renovated and the following: - Building pad Site A, a restaurant site - Building pad Site B, a bank site - Building pad Sites G,H,I,J, a multi -tenant retail building - Building pad Site K, an entry retail building - Building pad Site N, a junior box retail Lot 2, Block 1, is a 15.61 acre site which contains the Wa1Mart Site and the Northway intersection entry into the PUD. Lot 3, Block 1, is a 0.87 acre site which includes the Applebee's restaurant site and parking area. Lot 1, Block 2, is 1.22 acres which is the EDA parcel that has been enlarged to include a free right hand turn lane, which is being removed as part of the Shingle Creek Parkway & Bass Lake Road intersection and eastern entrance into the PUD. Outlot A is 6.85 acres which contains the northern Shingle Creek ponding area, the proposed daylighting improvements, the eastern entrance and perimeter service drive, and the 5.6 acres of storm water ponding and detention areas. Outlot B is 11.39 acres which contains the following Phase II building sites: - Building pad Site C, a large retail use - Building pad Site D, a smaller multi tenant retail use - Building pad Site E, a restaurant site with patio overlooking the Shingle Creek pond - Building pad Site L, an entry retail building - Building pad Site M, a restaruant with patio adjacent to Shingle Creek - Building pad Site P & Q, are junior box retail uses Page 1 3 -17 -11 Phase II improvements and development will involve the resubdivision of Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot B. At this time, the applicant has indicated that the current Kohl's lease prevents them from including the Kohl's site in the platting process. ZONING The property is currently zoned PUD /C -2 (Commerce District) and is within the City's Central Commerce Overlay District. Attached is a copy of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD plan which the Planning Commission recommended approval of on March 10, 2011. The City Council accepted the Planning Commission's recommendation on March 14, 2011 and directed the City Attorney to prepare the necessary resolution and PUD agreement. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Land Use Element of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update identified this site as a multi -use district including commercial (retail business, office /service), residential (townhome and multi- family) and public and semi - public uses. EASEMENT DEDICATION The preliminary plat provides for the following right of way dedications: 1. An additional 15 feet of right- of -way for Bass Lake Road West of Shingle Creek Parkway intersection. 2. An additional 10 feet of right -of -way for Bass Lake Road East of Shingle Creek Parkway intersection. 3. Dedication for the south leg of the Bass Lake Road and Shingle Creek Parkway intersection. 4. Dedication of 11.95 acres for State Highway 100. Additionally, it illustrates the following additional easements: • 10 ft. drainage and utility easement along the public right of way of Xerxes Ave, Bass Lake Road, and State Highway 100. • 17 ft. trail easement along Highway 100 • An 18 ft. trail easement for the relocation of the Shingle Creek Regional Trail • A 30 ft. utility easement for the existing 27" sewer trunk line, • 20 ft. utility easements for the existing sewer laterals which connect to the sewer trunk line • A 57 ft. drainage and utility easement for the two 12'x12' box culverts within County Ditch 13, Shingle Creek. • Reference to varying drainage and utility easement widths for Outlot A. Page 2 3 -17 -11 EASEMENT VACATIONS As part of the replatting of these properties, the developer will be requesting the City to proceed with the necessary notifications and hearing to vacate old and unused easements associated with the Brookdale Mall parcels. STAFF COMMENT The preliminary plat has been sent to Hennepin County Transportation Department and the Minnesota State Highway Department for their review and comment. Additionally, a public hearing has been scheduled for this preliminary plan and notice of the Planning Commission's consideration of this matter has been published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post. Attached is a copy of the Engineer's memorandum on their review of the preliminary plat and development plans which includes a number of issues which may involve changes to the preliminary plat which should be addressed before a Planning Commission recommendation is forwarded to the City Council. A copy of the memorandum has been forward to the project engineers with the expectation that a meeting with the development team and staff will resolve these preliminary plat issues prior to the March 31 meeting and also establish a framework that would enable the Final Plat to proceed for City Council approval in April. RECOMMENDATION It is the Staff's recommendation to continue the public hearing on the preliminary plat of Shingle Creek Crossing until the March 31, 2011 meeting. Page 3 3 -17 -11 8hrniiW Prook Trail /�, 5801 r� '•„-� LU w f f M1 58t0 7 �� a w -- .'j_"•-- -•--- �..`.,,� �'*�.., t t ! — r/ -- .•.,•, ^} """'_ --- NORTHWAY DR 1 1 { M 5701 3744M t r ---"�......,. �.,,, �•" tM54S I ��w Nt f 25041 r N BROOKLYNCENTER - CTR WS LAKE RU ! COUNTY ROAD 10 3243 r tr r 5710 — T 2301 66" 2501 Sfiol y� ^rr� l S2FD9 � jjy r Sgy 41, j r 1466 f f 53Afi t ` 1100 !�..✓ \ ,• 5523 -% `t ti 1265 w , 1 C i r" i 1108 , 2406 3313 SS � ��. R 4bb woo .r x 55{33 X31 � ! "" �E I • t, /t f �f �/ . 2406 p 1287 t J— 22 I 2z E ! d 5444 5445 y Lien* Park d.._.. ._ � t�...- .- -"""- "''c- ,.- .-- `�.""` -^� � ., �,�0� ..'� _.._ C�ni�rhr� �Yfcaurs • '. vi,...... 54:50 1 j r . / .r 7. 22 5401 5601 t 6,341 5425 Lm i .. . . ...:: . .. ...._$ ,G6 .. Planning Commission Application No. 2011 -004 MEMORANDUM DATE: March 15, 2011 TO: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works /City Engineer Bruce Johnson, Engineering Department Supervisor SUBJECT: Shingle Creek Crossing Site Development Review, City of Brooklyn Center Public Works Department staff reviewed the following site plan and preliminary plat documents submitted for review for the proposed Shingle Creek Crossing Development: • Site Development plans dated March 3, 2011 • Preliminary Plat dated March 3, 2011 The following are comments pertaining to the referenced documents: 1. All conditions of the approved PUD must be met. 2. Provide a Future Phase 2 Preliminary Plat that matches the PUD layout to review concurrently with the Phase 1 site plan and plat. Additionally, working copies of the Phase 1 and 2 plats that include an overlay of all utilities, easements, property boundaries, buildings, roadways, sidewalks, and other major features are required to evaluate conflicts. 3. Finalize all site reports that were prepared as part of the PUD approval and provide the City final copies (PDF format). 4. A development agreement is required that includes all conditions of the project approval, subject to the final site plan approval by the City Engineer. 5. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City of Brooklyn Center standard specifications and details. The City's standard details must be included in the plans. 6. Upon project completion, the applicant must submit an as -built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures prior to release of the performance guarantee. The survey must also verify that all property corners are in place at the completion of the project and set new, damaged or missing property corners as warranted and directed by the City. 7. Inspection for the site improvements must be performed by the developer's design/project engineer. Upon project completion, the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer's immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the state of Minnesota and must certify all required as- built drawings. Final Revised Shingle Creek Crossing Page 2 of 8 Site Plan Review Memo, March 4, 2011 8. A working drawing must be created superimposing and showing the plat with all building pads, proposed easements, proposed underground utilities and existing utilities that will remain including all depths of the utilities, trails, and other elements pertinent to the easements and property lines. This will be used to ensure adequate easements are provided for all necessary project elements. Easements, Agreements and Plat: 9. Property boundaries must be typical and straight, minimizing property boundary irregularities for sole purposes of parking boundaries. Additionally, property lines for Sites N, K and P should be revised to maintain an adequate setback (10') between the building and property line. Final property lines will be subject to final City review and approval conditions of the Site Plan, Preliminary Plat and Final Plat. 10. An overall easement agreement is required that will provide the City accessibility to all utilities and storm drainage areas to inspect and enforce proper utility service and maintenance for the entire site including Applebee's and Kohls. 11. The final plat must include dedicated public drainage and utility easements over the following locations and existing or proposed public utilities, as determined by the City Engineer. a. A 30 ft wide Utility Easement centered on the alignment of the existing trunk sanitary sewer extending from Northway Drive through the eastern portion of the Brookdale site to the northern right -of -way boundary for State Highway 100. b. A 20 ft wide Utility Easement centered on the alignment of the existing force main and trunk sanitary sewer extending from Shingle Creek Parkway through the eastern portion of the Brookdale site and terminating at the existing trunk sanitary sewer. c. A 20 ft Utility Easement centered on the alignment over the portion of the existing public sanitary sewer extending along the northern plat boundary near the Northway Drive entrance. d. A 20 ft Utility Easement centered on the alignment over the portion of the existing public watermain from County Road 10 right -of -way to the northerly right -of -way for State Highway 100 on the Kohl's site. e. A minimum 10 -ft wide drainage and utility easement along the perimeter boundary of the plat. f. A drainage and utility easement centered on the alignment of the existing box culvert drainage structure extending from Shingle Creek Parkway through the eastern portion of the Brookdale site. The box culverts must be centered within the easement and the easement width will be determined by the City upon the developer's determination of the specific location of the box culvert to survey level quality including the depth, g: \engineering \development & planning\active development projects\shingle creek crossing 2010\communication \project review & conditions\ 1103 15_fmal site -plat review memo.doc Final Revised Shingle Creek Crossing Page 3 of 8 Site Plan Review Memo, March 4, 2011 location, size, material, condition, etc., all that must be verified and certified by a licensed engineer to ensure adequacy of the existing structure and adequacy of adjacent separation of proposed improvements and structures. The width of the necessary easement will be determined upon submittal of this information and must be completed prior to final approval of the plat. 11. Legal descriptions must be obtained for all existing easements, which must be vacated as part of the subdivision and site re- development process. 12. An updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Attorney for review at the time of the final plat application (within 30 days of release of the final plat). 13. The proposed site plan and plat is located adjacent to County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 10 and State Trunk Highway 100. Minnesota Statutes require that the City submit the plat to the Hennepin County Transportation Planning Division and to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) for written comments and recommendations. The plat has been submitted and comments are forthcoming. All Hennepin County and Mn/DOT comments will be conditions of approval. 14. The site development plans and utility relocations must be reviewed and coordinated with Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, Qwest Communications and other private utility companies prior to final plat application, vacation of easements and/or approval of any site modifications. 15. Proper easement must be dedicated along Bass Lake Road (CSAH 10) and Xerxes Avenue that will contain all public elements of the roadway including but not limited to trail and sidewalk, plantings, traffic signal systems, fiber optic systems, lighting systems, irrigation systems, bus benches, litter receptacles, fencing and rails, pedestrian bridge and other miscellaneous streetscape elements. 16. A drainage and utility easement is required over the twin 12 foot by 12 foot box culvert and partial daylighted portion of Shingle Creek, both of which must be labeled private. The drainage and utility easement shall not be for ownership reasons, but shall be for inspection purposes to ensure proper maintenance is being performed. 17. 16 foot wide minimum trail easement must be dedicated and shown on the plat for the existing and/or proposed regional trail running from Shingle Creek Parkway to the pedestrian bridge that crosses Highway 100. Proposed and or existing trail must be centered within the easement. 18. 16 foot wide minimum trail easement must be dedicated and shown on the plat for the proposed trail running along the southeast ring road. Proposed trail must be centered within the easement. 19. Cross access, parking and utility agreements are required between all necessary parcels. g: \engineering \development & planning\active development projects\shingle creek crossing 2010\communication \project review & conditions\ 1 10315_final site -plat review memo.doc Final Revised Shingle Creek Crossing Page 4 of 8 Site Plan Review Memo, March 4, 2011 20. Provide an assigned truck route for the entire site to each building pad. This must be a documented truck route that will be implemented and enforced by all property owners. 21. The development agreement must include provisions by the applicant to develop, design and construct the public roadway, streetscape and utility improvements required for Bass Lake Road (CSAH 10) and at the intersections of Northway Drive and Shingle Creek Parkway with Bass Lake Road (CSAH 10), all subject to the approval of the City and the County. Should the developer desire the City to provide these improvements, a petition and waiver must be provided by the applicant petitioning the City to provide the needed public roadway and utility improvements along with a waiver of assessment for 100 percent of the costs for the public improvements. These costs will be the full responsibility of the applicant/property owner. Permittin> . 22. Copies of all approved permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of any City permit. 23. The property is located adjacent to Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) highway right -of -way and Hennepin County right -of -way. All Mn/DOT and Hennepin County comments will be conditions of approval. 24. Department of Health permit is required for watermain installation. 25. MPCA sanitary sewer permit is required. 26. MPCA NPDES permit is required. 27. Minnesota Department of Health permit is required. 28. Hennepin County access permit is required. 29. Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission (SCWMC) plan review and approval are required. 30. Department of Natural Resources, Army Corp of Engineers and other permits may be required as necessary. Storm Sewer System and Drainage: 31. All on -site storm sewer shall be considered private. All storm sewer lines and facilities must be specifically labeled "private sewer ". 32. The twin 12 foot by 12 boot box culverts that Shingle Creek flows through are considered private and must be specifically labeled on the plans "private ". 33. In areas where public parking and public drive aisles are located above the twin box 12 foot by 12 foot box culverts that Shingle Creek flows through, the culverts must be enrolled in the state bridge inspection program and inspections performed, accordingly, g: \engineering \development & planning \active development projects\shingle creek crossing 2010 \communication \project review & conditions \l 10315_fmal site -plat review memo.doc Final Revised Shingle Creek Crossing Page 5 of 8 Site Plan Review Memo, March 4, 2011 all of which must be done by a certified bridge inspector and manager via the property owner. Copies of the bridge inspections must be provided to the City on an annual basis. 34. Provide and show all utility and wall profiles crossing Shingle Creek. 35. Multiple temporary Best Management Practices (BMP) and devices must be used at locations that exceed the capacity of the silt fence or are too steep. 36. No direct runoff to Shingle Creek will be allowed. All sections of storm sewer that discharge directly to Shingle Creek must contain an adequate pretreatment device and must be designed to meet minimum treatment standards as approved by the City Engineer. Design computations must be provided demonstrating all existing or proposed pretreatment devices meets these standards, including the existing Kohl's sediment/ grit chamber. 37. All existing storm sewer and treatment facilities that are to remain must be properly cleaned and repaired to demonstrate a fully functional storm sewer system and certified as such by the licensed design engineer. 38. The site plans and all hydrology and hydraulic calculations must be presented to and approved by the SCWMC. 39. Provisions must be provided that demonstrate proper BMPs and supervision to ensure the project will be swept daily or as required by the City. 40. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) designers, installers and inspectors must be state certified. All certifications must be provided to the City as part of plan approval and permitting. 41. Provide temporary drainage piping and/or by other means throughout the entire duration of the project during the different stages of the project while the existing storm sewer system is being removed and revised. 42. Provide sediment pretreatment facilities for all existing and proposed ponds and infiltration basins. 43. All SWPPP BMPs must be installed and implemented prior to any disturbance of the property, demolition and/or site work. 44. Floodplain mitigation is required. Provide an analysis, report and plans showing proper floodplain impacts are being mitigated. The current plans to do not accurately show and demonstrate the limits of the current floodplain impacts relative to the existing contours. The existing floodplain elevation must be identified and accurately outlined with compensatory floodplain elevations, areas and volumes accurately outlined and shown with the proposed contour plan. g: \engineering \development & planning\active development projects\shingle creek crossing 2010 \communication \project review & conditions\ 1 10315_fmal site -plat review memo.doc Final Revised Shingle Creek Crossing Page 6 of 8 Site Plan Review Memo, March 4, 2011 45. Developer must demonstrate that the required infiltration rate requirements and calculations per the SCWMC standards are being met. 46. Provide typical sections for all infiltration basins and ponds showing slopes, benches, notable elevations, and other typical pertinent basin information. Watermain System: 47. All watermain line other than the existing public watermain shall be considered private. All watermain lines must be specifically labeled "private watermain" or "public watermain" as determined by the City Engineer. 48. Provide hydrants in locations as determined and approved by the City's Fire Chief. 49. Revise hydrants or hydrant tees so they are not located over the existing sanitary sewer lines. 50. All watermain connections to public City watermain must be inspected by city personnel 51. New watermain gate valves must be installed at all City watermain service locations. 52. Provisions must be made to ensure Applebee's and Midas maintain water service at all times throughout the duration of the project. 53. Revise the 3" domestic water service planned for Walmart to a 4" DIP service line. 54. Install a gate vale for the new watermain loop for Sears. Sanitary Sewer System: 55. The public City sanitary sewer through the site has been televised. The results indicate that significant segments of piping are in very poor condition and need to be replaced, repaired and/or lined. Further development of a strategy and plan for the necessary sanitary sewer replacement will be coordinated with the developer during the final plan approval and construction stages. 56. All sanitary sewer other than the existing public sanitary sewer shall be considered private. All sanitary sewer lines must be specifically labeled "private sewer" or "public sewer" as determined by the City Engineer. 57. Provide sanitary sewer profile for the existing sanitary sewer located along the south side of Bass Lake Road, west of Northway Drive. 58. All proposed lift stations will be private and labeled "private" on the plans. 59. All sanitary sewer connections to City main will be inspected by city personnel. 60. All utilities must be disconnected before building demolition begins. gAengineering \development & planning\active development projects\shingle creek crossing 2010 \communication \project review & conditions \110315_ftnal site -plat review memo.doc Final Revised Shingle Creek Crossing Page 7 of 8 Site Plan Review Memo, March 4, 2011 61. Insulate the top of the public sanitary sewer line from location station 3 +00 to 6 +00, which is the public line extending from Shingle Creek Parkway to the west across the site to the main public trunk line. Site Plan: 62. The easterly Kohls entrance from County Road 10 must be closed. Closure of the access supports the City's and County's roadway access management goals and also eliminates the trail safety conflict with this skewed access driveway. Adequate access is provided at the Shingle Creek Parkway intersection. 63. The internal trail /sidewalk crosswalks located on the north side of the existing building retail shops and on the southeast side of Site Q must be enhanced to improve pedestrian safety (raised crosswalk with special surface treatment and pavement marking delineation). 64. Eliminate all trap thru lanes that turn immediately into turn lanes on the far side of intersections throughout the site. Provide proper geometrics of turn lanes and delineation of them. 65. Alignments in the main drive aisle at the first intersection south of Northway Drive /Bass Lake Road are kinked. A skew of less than 20 degrees is acceptable but the alignments through the intersection must be smooth. The roadway radii between the two intersections must be a minimum of 300 -ft radius. 66. The pharmacy drive aisle geometrics will be further reviewed during the final construction plan review of the Wal -Mart site to ensure no conflicts exist, required storage is obtained and proper flow to and from the drive up is obtained. 67. Provide better ring road transition at the southwest of the site between the proposed section and the existing ring road on the Sears property. An on- street trail should be painted along the remainder of the ring road to Xerxes Avenue at 55 Avenue. 68. Provide boulevards (4 -ft minimum) for all sidewalks adjacent to the main internal site circulation roadways. 69. All loading dock and truck turning/backing areas must be fully separated from public customer parking areas and not encroach on main drive aisles. Site P, specifically does not meet this condition and must be revised. 70. Public parking lot ingress /egress routes must not be directed through loading dock areas and turning/backing areas. The Wal -Mart drive -thru exit area must be revised to minimize and deter this issue. 71. The Phase 1 completion needs to include the main site circulation route and include the portion adjacent to and that is used for access to Midas. Curb and gutter and sidewalk must be installed for all main routes under Phase 1. g: \engineering \development & planning\active development projects\shingle creek crossing 2010 \communication \project review & conditions \110315_fmal site -plat review memo.doc Final Revised Shingle Creek Crossing Page 8 of 8 Site Plan Review Memo, March 4, 2011 72. Pylon sign locations need to compliment city streetsca a improvements and not impair Y g p tY p p P visibility. Pylon sign locations as shown along Bass Lake Road conflict with the park district kiosk in one location and with the Shingle Creek overlook area in the southwest quadrant of the Shingle Creek Parkway intersection. Specific sign locations and plans are required and must be specifically approved by the City. 73. Alignments in the main drive aisle at the first intersection south of Northway Drive /Bass Lake Road are kinked. A skew of less than 20 degrees is acceptable but the alignments through the intersection must be smooth. The roadway radii between the two intersections must be a minimum of 300 -ft radius. 74. All internal intersections must be aligned properly through the intersections to eliminate any kinks and provide proper, smooth channelization and alignment. 75. All pedestrian crossings of public and internal roadways must meet the new Mn/DOT 7036G standard. Landscaping_ 76. Provide irrigation for the entire site. All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. The site plan and preliminary plat must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions above. Subsequent approval of the final plat and site plans may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading and geometric design as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. g: \engineering \development & planning\active development projects\shingle creek crossing 2010 \communication \project review & conditions \l 10315_final site -plat review memo.doc 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 15 1 16 1 17 18 1 19 1 20 1 21 1 22 1 23 1 24 1 25 1 25 1 27 1 28 1 29 1 30 1 31 1 32 1 33 1 34 1 35 36 1 37 1 38 1 39 1 40 1 41 1 42 1 43 1 44 1 45 1 46 1 47 1 48 1 A - - ----------- - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GOPHER ST�TE CALI�%NE NBEI C BECINS Wo TWIN CITY MCA 651-454-0002 c D 3 // `� + ' - _ _ _ - I I _ - mitts - ��ar�.+_ - - _'__' E 1A F --------------------------- F >` q, 4,i�� - �G� __ �r'c'� "'a,.S"�°" dp A H Q s j �"p K CA-1. 1"'-'AWMAW 00 A ------------ - ----------------- - M ? ?' - - r r .B[vcK 1, / , jfi'..r . / � `\', ' i!; �[[,�o�a; ; .. � � �� 0 i % I NEET C, a P ly LEGEND o — DEVELOPER CAR" CE LOPU ENT TREE NC. . SOUTH MAT DICKSON. N 37 R 6 A, R Ri 114 -11.4 m E OW IERS W.— .—DA. ALL .. L. KIMADIA MTG UC S ------ ,sow o T - =E� '"T COMMERCI 11 — RD iHAK PA GA 30 CE—DRIMENT CO,. INC. SCIT VAIN STREET DICK= TM 37055 U 615-446-7104 ---------------- CITY of ERC- 301 S NCLC CREEK PARKWAY V BROOKLYN ENTER. AN C5430 ILL ILL (9 "'e C W ITYOFSROOKLYN CENTER 7— MLEN-S A-- [m[ NUR CITY OF BROCKLYN E DEPARTMENT EX PARKWAY U.T--I) I—IRA W 6301 t ER— CENT CR ER, AN .4. LME 0 ENGINEER & PREPARER Y -HORN AND ASSOCIATES. INC. K LE r SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 2550 U— STY AVENUE W Lu m: SL PRELIMINARY PLAT ST. PAM, M ITE N5 SECTION 2 55114-200 — — T- 1111 — 0: -4197 (L 651 -T118N-R21W Wu C. MAT.K. P.C. BROOKLYN CENTER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SURVEYOR AA -TAR.A. .—I I X � SUNCE LAND �RAYNG 9001 EAST KOWINGTON MEEWAY (SSW) A.— PROJECTILOCATION W TOM scueu 813 00 w 3 CONTACT: MARK AMSCN. ILS (PW EXISTING GAL DESCRIPTION 0 CEN —A-- —=TI-R) C> Q DD ` DIN SITE DATA TABLE Y .-A-- o LO c.s T AMA ® w 0 U.1 unxxaL EE A —1 W— IS 1 W-W. A IFF WR —Z."MIL Pi GG U) �z > 3 BENCHMARKS W .4=-. DATE L k, , A 0/03/20" :" — I= I, --------------------- z ----------- x II =-P-W—W—W, PROIECT —E, ­P'T x) WW 'a—. VICINITY MAP NOT TOSCALE I Of 1 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONCERNING CERTAIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PROPOSALS OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, the proposal by the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota and the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota to modify Housing Development and Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project "); adopt the modified Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project, establish within the Redevelopment Project, Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 and adopt the related Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor (collectively, the "Plans "); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1082 and 469.174 through 469.1799; has been submitted to the Brooklyn Center Planning and Zoning Commission (the "Commission "); and WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed the Plans to determine the consistency of the Plans with the comprehensive plan for the City of Brooklyn Center: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center that the Plans are consistent with the comprehensive plan for the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. Date Chair ATTEST Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. To: Planning Commission Members From: Gary Eitel, Planning Commission Secretary Date: March 16, 2011 Subject: Items on the March 17, 2011 Planning Commission Agenda Agenda Item No. 6 Attached is a copy of the Architectural Design Guidelines, as prepared by Kathy Anderson, Architectural Consortium, LLC. These guidelines were part of the original submission of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD plans and are assumed to be the parameters which guided the initial key preparation of the PUD plans and the various revisions which have occurred, and will continue to occur as the site planning and marketing lead towards final site plans and business plans to locate in this PUD. Kathy Anderson will be present to review these design guidelines and the building elevations that were provided as part of the PUD package. Attached are copies of these exhibits showing the reskinning of the existing mall, an example of a junior box and smaller retail buildings intended to shape and form the Town Center image along the entries to this commercial development. Staff's initial concerns with the examples are the building materials illustrated on the back and sides. They are not of the same quality as the interior facing fronts. Additionally, to promote a Main Street appearance and to achieve the Town Center image, we believe that greater emphasis on architectural detail to roof treatment, building height, window placements, and architectural features which illustrate a higher profile and quality of construction are warranted. Additionally, enclosed are the building elevations of the Walmart store which identifies a significant amount of colored concrete panel construction on the rear of the building facing Hwy 100. After discussing and further understanding of the design guidelines, I thought it would be beneficial to apply these guidelines to the initial building design that will be considered for site plan review at the March 31 st meeting. Staff is meeting with the Walmart architect before the Planning Commission meeting to review their choices of building materials and discuss alterations that could be considered to enhance the quality and image of the anchor use as a commercial catalyst for this PUD project. The purpose of this item is to provide an opportunity for a presentation by the development team of their vision of how the project will be developed, to engage a discussion on the community's expectations of this vital commercial center within the Central Commerce Center area and to work towards a shared vision on how the PUD will be implemented. At this time, it is our goal to have a recommendation on the architectural guidelines and standards completed for the Commission's review and recommendation which will be included in the final PUD agreement for Council's approval in April. Agenda Item No. 7 Attached are copied of landscape and lighting plans included in the 1 St Phase site plan improvements that are part of the Walmart site plan review packet which illustrates the proposed streetscaping and lighting for the internal drive and entrance from Bass Lake Road and Xerxes Avenue. Will Matezek and members of the design team from Kimberly Horn will provide a presentation of the proposed internal streetscaping and describe the proposed lighting, plantings, side walk placements and boulevard treatment that provides the framework for the Town Center image and statement of the quality of commercial redevelopment that will be occurring in our city. It is also our goal to have a recommendation on these internal streetscape improvements for the Commission's review and recommendation as part of the 1 St Phase improvements that are identified in the PUD plans and the proposed Tax Increment Finance plan for Shingle Creek Crossing that will be considered by the Council in April. Agenda Item No. 8 Enclosed is a copy of the draft Community Development Activities/Project Map that was introduced at the last meeting. Enclosed, for your reference, is the invitation of the Joint Council and Commission meeting that was included in the last packet. A review of last year's agenda items and a discussion on how the role of the Commission in 2010 contributed to achieving the Council's Goals is planned for this time. Enclosed is the information received on planning workshops and educational opportunities for the Commission. I made an initial contact with GTS on other options for providing the training information on the March 22" and June 30th session on Your Role as Planning Commission Member available to the City. (i.e. Video presentation) The price of a separate /group presentation for the Commission/neighboring area Commission that cannot attend these week day schedules to be updated at the meeting. Shingle Creek Crossing 11/04/09 Architectural Design Guidelines Architectural Consortium LLC The overall design concept is to create a cohesive master planned development combining potential uses that may include anchor tenants, small shop retail, restaurants, enclosed mall tenants, as well as open-air tenants. The architecture should maintain a uniform character and reflect a style that provides for a harmonious retail development within the project. The aesthetics for key design elements shall be an abstraction of Shingle Creek, and be found in the pallet of materials such as masonry, stone, and metal accents that complement the established streetscape on Bass Lake Road/County Road 10. BUILDING ORIENTATION - Site planning concept of multiple buildings with a focus inward as well as exposure toward Highway 100, Bass Lake Road, and Xerxes Avenue as generally depicted on the 11/4/10 site plan submittal. - The orientation of buildings should take advantage of available view sheds of future development sites where possible. - Building entrances shall have a direct relationship to convenient parking fields. - Buildings along Bass Take Bond shall be located close to the road to create a pedestrian/ urban environment with signage on the street and principal entrances and signage facing internal communal parking and entry drives. - Anchor tenants along Hwy 100 should take advantage of the highway visibility by backing up to the property lines with loading docks and servicing and incorporating architectural elements that reflect some components of the front facades such as signage and raised parapets. - Buildings along the day lighted Shingle Creek, as available to restaurants, shall maximize opportunities for outdoor patios, pedestrian relationships and other recreational interactions. - Buildings containing restaurants adjacent to water features shall maximize opportunities for outdoor patios and internal views of the water. - Buildings along the major entry corridor shall locate in close proximity to the street to form a "main street," pedestrian friendly, environment. - Tenants in the enclosed mall shall take advantage of internal shopping traffic as well as external. BUILDING DESIGN Building Mass - Varying scale of buildings should be encouraged. - Varying rooflines to create interest in design styles shall be encouraged. - Maximum building coverage of the overall site shall not exceed 40 1 /0. - Large expanses of blank and featureless wall facing public street frontage should incorporate architectural elements to mitigate the expanse. Facade Design - Colorful canopies, roofs, and accents are encouraged, however controlled to a palette of selected colors pursuant to the color and material board submitted and approved by the city. - Architectural character will be consistently contemporary (non-traditional) with all buildings within master plan. - Masonry detailing such as soldier coursing, plane changes, or patterning shall be encouraged. - The use of cornices, ornamental lights, graphics, Tenant blade signs, and other architectural details should be encouraged. Building Materials - Materials shall be selected for suitability to the type of buildings and the design in which they are used. Building walls are to be finished in aesthetically acceptable tones and colors to be compatible with tones and colors of the approved palette. - Materials shall be of a durable quality. - Exterior wall treatments such as brick, natural stone, decorative concrete block, EIFS, glass, steel and architectural metal panels are encouraged. - All wood treatment shall be painted and weather proofed. - Colors and specifications of masonry and stucco colors should be a consistent range throughout the development - Blank single masonry walls must consist of 25% of decorative masonry using variation in color, texture, or surface - Rear of buildings shall be in a color to match predominant front masonry colors. - Existing buildings may be renovated to match new construction with the use of paint colors or other applied surface treatments. Doors and Windows Canopies shall be encouraged at entry ways. Window frame, material, and color to complement architectural style and be consistent in color throughout development. Window openings may be modulated to scale and proportion that is compatible with the architectural style. Maximize storefront and graphic opportunities to avoid long expanses of blank and featureless walls at street fronts. A minimum of 8' clear space shall be provided from sidewalk elevation to the lowest point of a canopy and or suspended sign. Window frames shall be constructed of prefinished metal. Window and doors shall be glazed in clear glass for retail buildings. Mirrored windows shall be discouraged. Where appropriate, the use of spandrel glass may be incorporated to mimic storefront glass. Graphic elements may be incorporated into wall areas to mimic storefronts. SCREENING - Loading areas shall be screened from public view with walls similar to adjacent building material, fences, landscaping, or physical distance separation. - Service and utility doors to be painted to match, or be compatible with, surrounding colors. - Drive — thru or service lanes should be screened with berming, landscaping or fencing. - Rooftop units may be screened by parapets or wall/fencing materials, or paint to match surrounding colors when visible from the public right of way. FRANCHISE DESIGN - The requirements of regional and national franchises shall be allowed to maintain their corporate identity and design theme but shall be encouraged to utilize similar materials, scale and style of these architectural standards, LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT Landscape design - Plant material is to be utilized within the master plan. as an aid to provide continuity within the site and provide a recognized definition of its boundaries. - Thematic boulders and water elements shall be incorporated to reinforce the branding of Shingle Creek as a site amenity - Reference the 2010 Bass Lake Road landscaping as inspiration to both plant varieties and theme. - Overstory trees will be utilized along external and internal roadways to reinforce roadway pattern but, placed so as to not block visibility of commercial signage. - Unity of design shall be achieved. by repetition of certain plant varieties, planting patterns, and other streetscape materials and by correlation with the approved landscape plan. - Entry points into the site are to be specially landscaped and are to be designed with a common theme. - Plant materials are to be utilized as a screening element for parking and building utility areas. - Plant materials are to be utilized within parking lot islands, grouped massing of landscape is encouraged in parking lots versus individual planting to maximize landscape impact and allow functional snow removal. Some islands may be paved as pedestrian walk areas. - Loading, service, utility and outdoor storage areas that are visible from public roadways shall be predominantly screened with fencing, walls, landscaping or berms. When natural materials are used as principal screening, 75% opacity must be achieved year round through the use of evergreen trees. - Plant materials shall be selected with regard to its interesting structure, texture, color, seasonal interest, climate zone durability and its ultimate growth characteristics.. - Where building sites limit planting, the placement of plant materials in planters, pots, or within paved areas is encouraged. - Perennial/shrub planting beds, trees and turf areas, shall be irrigated with an automatic irrigation system to provide optimal plant establishment and long-term plant health. Parking - When determined appropriate, commercial buildings are to accommodate bicycle/motorcycle parking areas and bike racks, - Cross parking between building areas is encouraged. - Parking stalls to be a minimum of 9 18' and drive aisles to be 24' (60' bay spacing)for two-way traffic and drive aisles to be 20' (56' bay spacing) for one- way traffic. Parking stalls may be oriented at 60, 75, and 90 degree angles. - Major drive aisles or truck routes may have increased aisle widths. - Parking lot layout should include clear, traffic movement for both pedestrian and automobile. - A minimum overall parking ratio of 4.511000 shall be maintained - Site impervious surface should be minimized to help preserve green space, yet provide the necessary parking amount to support the development regardless of uses. Lighting - Lighting should provide continuity and consistency throughout the area. All parking lot lights shall be metal halide, or 2000-4000 kelvin LED and be uniform in style, color, and height. Maximum pole height of 50' in parking areas and 28' in entry drive area-, and along property edges. - Pedestrian lighting should be of pedestrian scale height (12'-18') and be uniform in style and color. - Light poles, fixtures, and bases shall be a consistent dark color (i.e. bronze, black, or brown). - Exterior wall lighting shall be encouraged to enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. - Lighting styles and building fixtures shall be of a design and scale compatible with the building and adjacent areas. Shoe or hat box style fixtures are acceptable for taller parking lot lighting. More detailed ornamental style fixtures are - encouraged for pedestrian impact. - Yed. Excessive Light levels that promote a safe environment are encouraged. brightness shall be prohibited. - Dark sky and cutoff style fixtures shall be used for safety purposes. Pedestrian Connections - Pedestrian connectivity is encouraged to link all buildings within the site. - Pedestrian connections shall be made to the existing public sidewalk system. - Benches or seating shall be provided at appropriate areas for pedestrians. - Striping of crosswalks shall be required at appropriate crossings. - Outdoor seating areas and. outdoor sales areas will be allowed and encouraged. Such areas shall. utilize a unified theme and approach to the defining elements (structural elements, railings, shading, paving, lighting, landscaping) for the creation of these exterior spaces. Bicycle Connections - Trail connections shall be maintained and connected to the existing overpass system - Bike parking and resting areas shall be incorporated as an element of the Shingle Creek waterway - The trail. shall be designed to allow continuous flow of bicycle traffic as well as areas of reffige - Pedestrian shopping sidewalks shall connect to the trail at appropriate intersections ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North Third Street, Suite 220 6124364030 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612692 -9960 GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY — Key Plan Lj o,, j- � -- -_ - - _ - - - -- - - I EXI5TIN6 NORTH ELEVATION 4 .. �� ,� 51M/ ATM — - BACKLIT — -- � SAL / STOLE -- - _ FR05TM / CORNICE PREPIk MIST - sra+xaar -_ OLA65 CORNICE - �- - r' - ILLUMINATED _ — EIFS 515NA5E _r TENANT TENANT - � NORTH TENANT Mark Revision /issue Date 5R41LA7ED -- 0-V BASE BRICK PREFIN. PETAL EMRN"CE DECORATIVE ANOD. ALUM. NE STO CANOPY TO MALL LICNT STOREFRONT 2 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION -- — - -- - - = SHINGLE CREEK } CROSSING EXISTI!1Z EXISTINS EXIST. NO BARNES A SERVICE COURT EXI5TING WE57 ELEVATION BROOKDALE CENTER ___- _PREFIN.P¢TAL 3 REDEVELOPMENT BACKLIT ' CORNICE FR05TED 6LA55 BACKLIT CORNICE 51MRATED _- _ _ -- -, :Y PREFIN. METAL BROOKLYN CENTER, MN ewuc PRGSr�D 5rot� = �� NT 6LA55 EIFS BRICK LiLM1NA7� 7T SieRAS -- _ _ - TENANT TENANT _TENANT : IEw�li 71 zmmff� -- - — _- -_.__ _ EXTERIOR "" ELEVATIONS - .. PREFIN. METAL EXI5TIN6 DECORATIVE 64WA5 PRE—IN. METAL ANOO. ALUM. CW BASE EXI5T,NS CAhOPy SERVILE COURT LISNr AWNS. CANOPY STOREFRONT S EARS - - �RC_: - -. _.- - 0I -20-11 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION ��( `- i Al Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2010 ARCHITECTURAL ..... CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North Thad Street, Suite 220 612436 -4030 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612.692 -9960 I EXISTIN6 OVERALL EAST ELEVATION � !L/ GATllN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY TENANT 1.. TENANT - - y Ian - — Ke PROPOSED OVERALL EAST ELEVATION � iV EXI5 CURVED ENTRY BEYOND _ NORTH Mark Revision /Issue Date I I - EXISTIN6 EAST ELEVATION CURVED MALL 3 /16' . r-O' ENTRY BEYOND CORNER -OPER i . TENANT - _. - -- -. TENANT EFS DELOCnnVE LIENTS - 4 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING -- -- BROOKDALE CENTER - --------------- orExlsnme REDEVELOPMENT SEARS BEYOND I MALL TO BE REMOVED N I------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- L BROOKLYN CENTER, MN - - -, r ----------------------------- - - - - -- -------------- - - - - -- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 i Ex1571NS ATRIUM. I I TO BE REMOVED 11 I ii J ii EXTERIOR EXISTIN6 EAST ELEVATION CONTINUED s ELEVATIONS - - - -- - - PREFIN. METAL SIM4J.n�_ P BACKLI STONE FR 5Z 01 - 20 - 11 - ND — — C.ORNILE. SEARS BEYO �- $M°4 ' OSTED_ -y -5 -_� OI -�O-II 1 ILLIMINAn2 GLA55 EIFS `�` * BL 916NA6E --- - - - -__ _ n 1 -REF N, METAL CANVA5 ENTRANG- ANOD. ALUM. BRICK - - LMU BASE EIF5 CANOPY AWNINGS TO SEARS STOREFRONT , 6 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION CONTINUED Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2010 ARCHITECTURAL �� CONSORTIUM L.L.C. EIFS DECORATVE ,ILLUMINATED CORNICE - 901 North Truro so-eet, suite zzo 612- 436-4030 BACKLIT -- Minneapdis, MN 55401 Faz 612 - 6929960 -" FROST TENANT - -_ - - - -- -- -- TENANT TENANT TENANT er Ass -. — BRICK — -- '+. ii cFV BASE /� �TT �i DEVELOPMENT AWN CA N V AS IN 5 55 CANOPY FETAL - STOR OD. ALU R T GAT UN DL / LLOPM� COMPANY AWIN CANOP ST�ROI. FRONT SIDE Key Plan L*HT TVE SIPS SIONA LI6NT 51 G NA6 EPREFIN. FETAL CORNICE ('1 TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TEN T TENANT T --I I I !CK . : F -7 1 - -�/ - J - PREfIK METAL PAINTED HOLLOW CANVAS CMJ CANOPY FETAL DOOR AWNIN65 NORTH 51DE REAR Mark Revision / Issue Date � TYPICAL ELPVATIONS -PAD BUILDING BACKL T PREFIN. FETAL FROSTW 6LA55 CORNICE ILLUMINATED 516NA6E EIFS TENANT` ,. ..DECORATIVE - ANOD. ALUM. PREFIN. METAL - BR(iK CMU - L16HT STOREFRONT CANOPY - - - -- fRONT SHINGLE CREEK PPEFIN. ETAL - C ROS S I N G CORNICE - ILLUMINATED - EIFS 516NA6E TE BROOKDALE CENTER REDEVELOPMENT BROOKLYN CENTER, MN PAINTED FOLLOW DECORATIVE ' PREFIN. METAL -- BRICK ' ch-t METAL DOOR LI6HT -- - CANOPY 51DE EXTERIOR FRONT PARAPET BEYOND EIFS L UMNATED ELEVATIONS 916NA6E - -_ -- TENANT °RD_CG . _F O- c . - LOADING DOCK Cm - BRICK SCREEN WALL REAR Q 2 TYPICAL ELEVATIONS -MAJOR ANCHOR /�3 Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2010 - PI=S CORAT7V'= ; IL- UMINATED P REFI ti. -E 16�iT 516NA6)= T _ � _ GORhIGE EAGKLIT TENANT TENANT TENANT FR°s--:r? TENANT - `M K I GK BA-Z S CANVAS PRO=IN. METAL ANOD. ALLM AI^Nt`IES GANOP'! STORE FRONT SIDE DEGORAT7VE EiF5 ILLLJMIKAT ;7 - - -- i16*fT 516NA6E -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- GORNIGE - - -- ,y -- ----- - - - - -- --- -- - -- - - - - - - - -- - -�_ -- - -- TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT i - -- "fREPIA1 h' TAL PAINT® HOLLOW CANVAS C'm CANOPY ItG-TAL DOOR ANW i NEf 5DE REAR TYPIGA�L EL�V,4T14N5 - PAD BUiLDIN6 �`! - -�ae�►n rr - -` FR.OSTW 6LA55 PREFIN. 1 = Al_ C.04NIC,F ILLL MINATEP EIFS 516NASE - - -- - TENANT" y - DECORATIVE - ANOD_ ALUM. PAIN. METAL BRCK C'm L16F 5TOREFRON7 CANOPY FRONT PRI=IN. METAL GGRNICE iLLIJMIKATID EIF5 St6NA6E - - -- TE NANT y i I i J;- - I i -- _-- __ -____ I ; , PAINTED HOLLI OH DECORATIVE I'RE"IN. METAL BRICK GNU METAL DOOR L ?6♦rT - CANOPY 51 I? FRONT PARAPET SEYOi _ EIFS L1 JMMATED sI6+vACE - - -- -- - -- - -- -- - -- -- - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - -- — TENANT - - - - -- — ----- ---------- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - - LOA:IN6 VCPSK GM1 BRICK SCR WALL FEAR ( ' :2 ) TYPICAL ELEVA710N- 5 - MAJOR ANCHOR III Walmart Broo Ce nter, MN BENHAM Issued October 21, 2010 ,9 ( f. 1 { " c d � o I t LI AO BENHAM Walmart ♦ ♦ October 21, 2010 Brooklyn Center,MN Perspectives 2 1 i i LA v i�l�l�i 1 f i t ICI si w i mil ..-� 791 .EP z �� I { I I I1 i cc �o tl II 111 11 I� 11� 1' 1 v " O 1r1 W .. _ 1 i rr rrr rr i MLEN rr E III III i II lo Ir� 1 II 111111 � III a W � m WIT LA > rr �4- rrr rr •�1 � U 1 0 m 1 iltllliitt i o � 1 111�1�1 r��isi 1 0 1�1�1�1 .� . L 1 A W m — RY—K. PANEL SYSTEM - -TRESPA METEON METALLIC PANEL SYSTEM 'ROW HOUSE EIFS ,N SE TAN' 'CENTER' TRESPA METEON METALLIC ' - DARK BROWN' EIFS SW 7680 PRE -0AST PANEL PRECAST PANEL EIFS SW 2823 EIFS SW 7718 PRE - FINISHED METAL SLAT - ROW HOUSE TAN' EIFS SW 2823 'RED BRYAN' - BUFF NAPOIEON' 'ROOKWOOD CLAY' EIFS SW 7718 'ROOKWOOD CLAY' PRECAST PANEL 'OAK CREEK' AWNINGS SWVS"8 TRICORN _ 'OAK CREEK' 'BUFF NAPOLEON' BLACK W Outdoor Living Home & Living "YVw I'm N Ia .s t. Ae� ee� �R�a - �� u r BENCHES BIKE RACKS BENCHES - +BIKE RAC:(S DUIK- BRIK'PROMENADE OUIK- BRIK'PROMENADE C .US LIT F COLORED INTEGRALLY COLOR ED CM USPITACE'CREAM' PROMENADE BLEND' BY OLDCASTLE BLEND' BY OLDCASTLE CMU SMOOTH FACE "CEDAR' BY OLDCASTLE INTEGRALLY COLORED BLEND' BY OLDCASTLE _ WIK- BRB('PROLIENADE BY OLDCASTLE ' CMU SMOOTH FACE'CEDAR' ' BLEND' BY OLDCASTLE BY OLDCASTLE Front Elevation INTEGRALLY COLORED CMU SPUR FACE TO MATCH SW COW -TOASTY' INTEGRALLY COLORED PRE -CAST PANEL CMU SPLIT FACE'CREAAf PRE -CAST PANEL PRE -CAST PANEL 'RED BRYAN' BY OLOCASILE PRE -CAST PANEL "RED BRYAN' - BUFF NAPOLEON' 'BUFF NAPOLEON' PRECAST PANEL 'RED BRYAN' I L~ O'JIK -ERIK -PROMENADE OUIK- BRIK'PROMENADE BLEND" BY OLOCASTLE OD - ERIK PROMENADE BLEND' BY OLDCASTLE BLEND BY OLDCASTLE Rear Elevation BE wal mart.' o '� Octo ber 21, 2010 Brooklyn CenterMN Elevations 5 NHAM ,. PRE -CAST PANEL PRE -CAST PANEL PRE -CAST PANEL PRE-CAST PANEL 'RED BRYAN' 1 EIFS SW 77;2 * 'BJFF NAPOLEON' F RED BRYAN' - BUFF NAPOLEON' r - OAK CREEK' L 3. OUi(- BR1K BLEND' BY OLDCASTLE OUIK- BRIX'PROMENADE BLEND BY OLDCASTLE Right Elevation PRE -CAST PANEL PRE -CAST PANEL EIFS SW 7712 -RED BRYAN- PRE -CAST PANEL - RED BRIAN' i � - OAK CREEK' JFF NAPOLEON' PRE -CAST PANE- PRE -CAST PANEL f RED BRYAN' - BUFF NAPOLEON' QUIK- BRIK'PROMENADE QUIK-BRIK'PROMENAOE BLEND' BY OLDCASTLE BLEND' BY OLDCASTLE Left Elevation Sign Qty Color Height Illumination Sq.Ft Total Sq.Ft almart 2 WhiteNellow 5' -6" Internal 298.00 596.00 Market & Pharmacy 1 White 2' -0" N/A 65.65 65.65 Home & Living 1 White 2' -0" N/A 46.47 46.47 Outdoor Living 1 White 2' -0" N/A 49.43 49.43 Pharmacy Drive -Thru 1 White 1' -6" N/A 39.88 39.88 Enter 1 White 1' -0" N/A 3.23 3.23 Exit 1 White 1' -0" N/A 2.34 2.34 Total Building Signage: 803.00 I m r �' October 21, 2010 Brooklyn Center,MN Elevations 6 BEIIIHAM Wa a t , 1 1 2 1 J 1 4 1 S 1 6 1 7 1 fi 1 9 10 11 12 13 1 14 15 1 16 1 17 18 1 19 1 20 21 1 22 1 23 1 24 25 1 25 27 1 28 1 29 1 30 1 31 1 32 1 33 1 34 1 35 1 36 1 37 1 38 1 39 40 1 41 1 42 1 43 1 44 1 45 1 46 1 47 1 48 r ,'---- __ -_._ . .____J ! . „ ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT a \ 1 -- - --- -- - -- ! i ! GOPHER STATE CALL ONE 14 I MN TOLL FREE 1 -SM- 252 -1166 ?< I 4 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS T"N CITY AREA 651 -454 -0002 r , e L I'I C 1 ;1 i � i � _\ � � J 4 u ; / / � \ '•. �_ - I -• -__ _ __ -____ sue_ - - __ 7`� � _ - E �_ ; / / � • ' - � ..a•D J'f 94'at 5•T � ,•E^l _______ I J - - • Nat 6 �; - 35. IF i YYY T' / omn / ' 1 9 xMdT T � d r atI9c1110 ° _ __ _______ ____ r � 1 i „r D - -- o`OT t•2 t ` �A a+ "- A AtdtWAV 1 Y j ,� .+ . 1=--Y' t` 6 i ,,,�1. O eFdG I Z9 H / = .� °J� t "? m dA.f+a ' (�" ^ �' > 4 ` as " g L � � : � 1 %' /`>s' eur -9119 C, 1 � - �e1 < , t _ a �re�.srn TM r _ � h pID � .� %� 4 .i�•�tt • 1 e �. ..�� ' � 1 M ) j.� z I 11 / i /,1 I ;` { 'xo' mAaAl� I "E�isNER* `` `� J - 1i1 ; � p4r >. NJC\. a aoo ' �iT ; 11 `l /i'ia O 11 Y 1( UTLOi 6 } 1 7/ 2 � k \t I • J _v4.t t 1 1 w.,w.a � 1 t0u ,ys 1 i ° A, Y / �j I t \ 1 i 1 crd[MTM01rd \ Y ` - e�;t,yl sz xi I F 5 I9 \__r >_- ______ `�, �• �� / 7 /aM 7 � �". ` :! � t t � �� \ ` S i1 i , Y .(4��"t��'y't'r .t �j' �� 1 LOT law ;e l l _ \ I` • /.y6 �✓ 1 �•. o la 2 't I ♦. NORTH W k) N / �fLQ17C7 • d r% t \ BLOCKt M I1�'i I t % ' /'� / / LoT 1 y = ` 't \-' t t `\ _ \ fit ; i a pt /- "5 . DLO K 1. 1 - _ t * WC n f :'� ' i t e - \ \ •iGiSl $ � �� � O 150 309 \ �°'* SCALE FEET 'jai t Y _ - o o r � , JI 1 t 1 �a t\ ' ` \' LEGEND Yax; *ENT P ,? DEVELOPER ` ` ` " /� - b' / ' SUM LAE W �x o f t g i t ' ^'\ • \\ t v. �_ „/ CATUN DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. _- _- C•Si1NC PROPERLY UAE ' '1 , 1 1 , 1 \4 ;• - 301 SOUTH MAIN STREET 1 DICKSON, TN 37055 voPoS f• % __ , 5) - 't '`� t - ______ CO KC RTY LINE R 615- 446 -710a ' sv E ' , 1 !F .�� ` \ � t t i \ / - 1 ... .. 6$a:WS a 1 '' I '� 1 V` t t - �' f . / E.ISTINC o0N L�. ` 1 1 \ 9 , , `A� 1 s • t .%/ {s. ��.� E t OWNERS -- -- - - PROPOSED SEta,CK ONE 1 ' // - % /' 1 Y !/ BROOKDAL MALL HH LLC _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ [.t5TN0 EAS[N[ °T _ S t , � s,. 7 vJ ' '. • +i i / - i'' BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MTG LLC III o r V lllrrr I , '� 1 _ // -'\ �� / / /I 116 WELSH RD _ __ - - -___ P 09L� EASEMENT UNE z m I' / _ i 1 HORSHAM. PA 19044 .p`7 _ % / �/ / j' ,J► . 1 } ' N °u p I ' ` 1 t ; -/ `� I t t . � . �� ' 'low RAti < z • S o T l I \ r '\ 1 \ \4 p'� Jj / - GAT 301 SOUTH MAIN NC. N STREET RLTrNO `� a v ' ' ; ( t rE• � DICKSON. TN 37055 j 1 'R t • ,t y ti9totvo U 1' • 1 1� !. j \\ \ \\ L TL "A t . �! ) 615 -416 7104 ................ C.ISTMC CURB U14 _ 1 \i��t 1. \ �' :. 6 ( � < ^. •' t/ , 0 T OF BROOKLYN CENTER rMIX .NE - V u 1\ \ �' ,t`. ` t.' ewc , 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY . '„ , \ / \ 3• _ ... SuaTAFY SLlCR UN_ 4 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 5543(1 J W 761- 569 -5340 __ _- , i; ! \,� o /'s( -1/ b b. J !' /: AATEP LINE (D P �\ < G _ b ' CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER W IN _ _._ T La - \ �, - d. \/ a � , � -, �� A% N 11 .. -. .• FA eiiT ^ � �''/ CITY OF BROOKLYN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT _ __.. _ 5 oPk SC � a.0 � W `-- ►�`- " -" 1 ` I T �1t /a 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY - Q _ fi S X ROOKLYN CENTER. MN 55430 LNOrnCPwxD C.Ettmc I:NE Z (n ' 763 -569 -3340 LAS -E O .0 ENGINEER t PREPARER - u"9ERCrLUrr� couuuNl:AnoN LPtE Z SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING [D d4 ! KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. J _ � 1 � •. � /,.. ( 1 �: i 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W ^ m SArNtAPY kANtIdE W ° , ; 1 ;, y 1 Itt 1. � g*AI NId+wAY i � U) r .y l 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT ST- UL, MN 55114 -200 s S-1 PA SUITE 235N ARY .11 S ?ATKR1 ' , i I L'•:; \ ` 1 /ROW WDaT tl.� 651- 645 -a197 41 Irvc...7 n " /� % j SECTION 2-T1 18N-R21W CONTACT: WILLIAM D. MAT2EK. P.E. BROOKLYN CENTER, +MtEa t o r i'• i \ ' 1 + NDE MI NO ON SURVEYING REEW iY HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUR VEYOR • Are =YAm u+NNaE AA SO Yy , 9001 EAST BLOOMINGTON FREEWAY (35W) ® 4.ORM SCNCR uANwOLC LY PROJECT LOCATION 8 SUITE Ila W O ROOM ♦ 5 YYER CAI rl 04.4 lt Y \ ! 1 4 \ ' • / - !' ; L INGTON, MN 55420 -J 3 - 0 4 ORM SC C 1 Z �-' 8 § t `i� ; RooF 9R 4''� J ;� J , 1 T: MAR K HA 6 -9 NS Do., CONTACT: , T: MARNSCN, PLS Cn W m [, 1L.a9T EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION ``APED E "° sECnaN (n C� I CC E ',, i \ i i\ ` • ' i , w C E N E 1 4 (P« F.. Am« till• I. -- C__y ConznlLn.I.1 RY n. W.wonw CawIO -I p w 111 O C) 'i ' Aj 1 d d m' J O°' t `A Y Y Y NP MM- 43000 -MPLS, com.B t dot* Meat t, »lo) 9 ucNT PqS (Y } It LL7 ' 6� �. .JP Pec* Al (C«N6cat. o f TAI• Ne. t1c 061). (� ' a CAS ME ER J 04 DD No T E C. Regi : SITE DATA TABLE S \ `� • -y ' r ` ; 2 * r ; P« 1 T. «t• A. C and D. R• sorr . . WM.ps, coo, : Mia,•.om Y Y CO t 1 • E r ® , S �t - L No 1469 N v CAS -,ALLC O Ln O 1 CM w ZDNNI; PONCa * Pe 2 Tract. A 8 e Xt- LoId S wr N. 1614, H tV. County, If ••ot W _R I ] •' •], LsW! �1 ELECTRIC TPANYC PVI: O Put Lor ARV, LOT AREw PRO.oeeous[ I(, W Pe 3 a PR11 el Trecl B RpnteN LaM S rve. 14 69. 1T10, Nmnep Caunlr MMeola W 2 EE I L \ \ ,: 1 • 1 OT t. aIOQL O». RT Bf M Nal AfM6 Gp11ERCYLL i - '- e.1ya•d MYI racl B. RepV•IwN ­d $•ewY . 14 O ELCC`PIC W\IIQE Of () f jj i 1 I LOT 7.KOIX1 1 670).43, 1.1 A-1 COMICRCWL A•q � 5 Q" - _ � I - ll.- / LOT 3. KOCe1 s. ,d 1aF O. AC1c0 cO46a:AC1n1. y 37M AV. d _ a) Pe 4- Trac1 C. Ragi•l«N Lana AYwY NO. 1719. N•vnw4t C tY. ­11 • ELECTRIC 1. V u OM / J -- LOTt.KOL112 TJ.14)&F. 129AOK6 (bYeE11GML i a ut w �6 R Pe 5: Trod. A 11,1 B. R.T: oo Lord Setwy Na, t766, Hon h County, M'm•nla ® cuclwc 00. W Z F'r i STA i90HWAY I KII1MA tAACra 9aA1raF. 7mA1d4TS cOLBffeCl4t asw A6E 3 x J I\ o ` ' 1 �'' 1 I KDAIE P.-AZ w MON;aMOREU (� y (n 0 ` riONf 1O1L % j I ROrA T $11 ' CEN ss. {.K Agib COIe1pIAREA [ uL °- tER V `D ourLOr9 4M]l9lE. 11rA194Ea cdDEI1G14L �' 0 * Non- •rtW.lw •a1•In•n1. o• ca+ta�n•d M IM Op «at�9 A4•etW't- BrooLdaM SnwP ny Gnt•r. MIIFG O(Hf GG 1 `\ 1 ` t � . , /' COIBf1Y 14DN0.N ]O.TO aF. 9tlACR6 ROw OEd9A11W Q 37M A l Lw m � _1I ` 10 xt 1 t u >In`A of ft fe l Lbva�y Aq�wlron late) Y�oy e. 1Gie. ol�ded m COIAkLRIlt.noN wNNa[ W \•, /� arAra t4Mr ND 1r s A.M93 P- n.raaa:a ROWOEdrwlwd d * 6 -y. "�. y .itoti T- y 1 IOIAL vn) ILI )atl KiC3 5.MA 1970, F IM % • of 1M R.OYbe of t A Doc. No. 12716]4, m en•nd•d OY M. Secmd 1, Arrletwn.nl to Opeotiy Agwn.nl detN Api 10. 2001, Mtia Y unI•c«dN eut .nian • d [OANUfUCAnON BOA '^ z HH 1 ` t � \ \ L / BENCH MARKS /no o.n aa. n. �• LuAC RR. MI. a�.d AI 6. 20M o Doo. No 490 R•• at . 7} 3.� oPeou•w A,--I A,--I ° aaN Aor9 1e, c �, v' w i - 11 t , \ / 314 A4r: N sra ) E ' * Non- u .own.IM a. and M tM atop 30110 t YoY 1A 197e..•coaled CAKE it 90A n ATE m 1929 Oaezn) . i = * ( i C * * j Ma 1 19,6 'M M. anw o/ W Ra91sv« w �c Ib. t �N Dy IM B, m omandN % 3 _ -___- _ � _ -_- 1.) Too of too nut of f,* nydonl: ...I -1 of x•ron Aw oL ae .autMnl caw d tn• sIt•. ]a N .r L A. u . AK i : * 5•ceq MMnbttani to a in A� 1 ..N i 18. 1301. nA kA Y a11c o. E�Tb't c BOLLARD OS C 3 2011 T. IM C«t' KaM ad t 1b 9 11, 1•. - Avao.1 16 20W m Doc No vEPttATld. PROJECT '40 __ - ___ y II -- Ekwlim - 853.13 Izzt { Y' 8 2.) Too a eat: n UN.I .4. of bon•mY.ion tow. Ina taw« wet of [em Aw 400.775+. 160633007 o.wtiot - 5^1..o f ., ! E 7.) Too of ME MNet z'd• of trc . m. w- m t of PN..Vdn an'ege. Pa•W 8 (Cenfcal• of nw No. 1159915$ SHEET NLMBLR P.__ - 946.96 Mat 4.) top .11. mat a Or. nprml; 1—., 1— of M• .il• VICINITY MAP S t� «I 8, Rp41.rN Lend SurwT Na. 1]10, Nev,apin c 146 MI-to. .+ppl gat pail M•Ip1 E l E4w - 951.58 Met Moc•d ,r�Uut Trac! B. R.pe1eN Lanl w.•Y No. 1.69. NOT TO SCALE I Of I 0 • , it 3 , w ;�v Q/ i IIf Ts)t�t .cam ..v.t ,.r, 91 Til N'�l�1�N + /� PROPOSED PRO TQ��6 Q O g e -F P PROPOSED MONUMENT t ' • • ♦may• COUN PYLON SIGN — 7 'A v x - r ♦ !♦. ! ♦ ♦ ♦ r4 ..:. ` m::�•.'., . : • - _ •..w•..\.c- _ I t i •�_' I I $IGN, .., PROPOSED PYLON PROPOSED MONUMENT �_ • _ , " `_ W _ ' SIGN _ - :Z 7v PROPOSED MONUMENT , , M1�1 ' � i' � � _ - SIGN IF w (Ai lw • ' r r� EXISTING 14.49oa = v♦as. to ao5st qq ♦ WDAS EXISTING _ s RI ES FFLAND WALL '." `j ' /;' ._ :H. • t0.1l9M. t.OtO,t 1 47W i /_IMPROVEMENTS` !if as.oso.t ./ J �.. , f /.., .111 - PROPOSED SHINGLE A r ,N \ y G � . `` • — — — I 1 t CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL / "''* 4' • / - — / _- PROPOSEDDAYLIGHTED tq: —� ' SHIN � AI'P �" 'r a ___ � � � l +5 GLE CREEK I K - r f r PROPOSED r t 1. 7s.08oer r ' �,�, / _ / - PROPOSED FREEWAY MONUMENT _ _ x / a +mw j 'l _ ti PYLON SIGN► SIGN , -_ ..... EXISTIM1IG J �; BUIIDItIG TRAIL CONNECTION SHOPS NG BR CONNECT ON _• -. , - TO EXISTING : SHOPS x.41 / r Walmart • • • 4/ < '.� ;.. LLJ ' _ , f5$076 5.F. (APPR01L) \ .. ♦: Q ~ f EXISTING SHINGLE ? N T' CREEK BOX CUWERT r saasa� �` I \ /, / l EXISTING � ;► SEARS 17tti �/ 1 (N07 NCONt Cl) Y ', \ ,� ��� \'�' '. _ ✓ � . f/ � / COQ ` i�w - r7 PROPOSED FRLEV:AY i PYLON SIGN ,.�.. SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING r MASTER PLAN ,/ FEBRUARY 2011 PROPOSED MONUMENT. _ SP A --- ` SIGN \ .` 'vi .� -1► G� t► ; 0 60 120 24, 'IQ + J -ne��v Kimley -Horn GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and Associates, Inc. fi 101 South Main Street , Dickson, Tennessee 37055 Tel 615- 446 -7104 . ` ` - ' .• Fax .615 - 446 -7105 " I G J v J o / ° �J IV II Ic IJ Iv 10 1/ Ie l7 cV L1 LL LJ 1 L4 I cJ GJ LI LSf c7 JV JI JG JJ J4 JJ JO J/ JO Jy vV Y f m F � ° • -'-� �_ -=� i^ - _ ..._..__.._ _ --_ — ___= 1 -__ -_ - - --= -- c,_, �_'"Z_: - -•. — � NORTH ' -- -- COUN TY RD f NO 1 0 ~^ BASS LAKE RC ND ' i 1 �.-� -- <" ! CWNTI An 1W 10 BASS LARt ROAD C__ o uo zao � • • � A$$a �'m�� � a6A4''asTacr. L $ ° wrap$ °L °` � �'i.'•1$�`', —__ —_� Q ��- -� � 4 BY Y.6L •.k >A4:.k.)1 ARSa is ♦ kr $ LRN' RL A S � 6W $ R Ea � L4 as >' •• i SCALE FEET S ac'ce m k Yas$s x A " ELE6 Et K t tAS m t 6 m i a J II 645 i4 g;R I i> ># RRSt RRmm4Rti tl� kii >RE&CW / . ` YLIC l✓ $ }E L � L i u �� 6• y ii y i g °L°3' ygy * yg � my8 at> WN r� b � T� `\� ��am4aY m'8R>RiiRb>mi II>�� 0 3...DH S .RYgB� Wa sabn«c ��p > ' E��. �' paLraLCLa�Y a1�$eanw�wk ' /! Y ,: +KR • • Lba4ip t h..iu EGKLS 4�Y L i $ �Ox. >p$K4k.2> $f'-0$4 r � 5 4 > $•. Yia Rx 1\ awl. 6 W $Y2 a G° b YLL6>ai a.4. a 6 py °. sASa ♦> «'$ °` OEM Y t a `:�6c4m$ _ ® ' $L> s Y s iui Fea s $$ `t EXISTWl3 g z Z .dfs< LDYi.hSAffi1, e$ K�$°•$rm��Cr &t a.6 •. °`° _ ; Y "� Vdi 2 >a$$ ${.s m6 3 aac. asua "'6.i.w$mx6 •ix $ A >6 s R1 p`ck G6 rAm 6 Ra. RKCKC$ tYRSa �' �� iI {$ s°6ssAa.Y kc >Ss i s z.> b cs'm'R usasa ms ' s c N iffia s s ME'!' K ms Y � x• �i gal L • �� / , R�. mss$ stYR K a4LF -6>ik C.�E€ kJE G R r ` :!Y 911�k $iL ..L R>t y g F L . . � ,, 6 . ii / / /���,,, ���a>>�� y ,,,,ya . `gym 6iE •.LGF -k Li..L�`.Rb m 4T CiSteY.tla E' tS1 „ >M�4L°�dat %;LLRtxRi a $L CCC` 6 _� �$$ NYSE Y.>Lait4tY >t am6«x Lm p lin mss�♦u♦pp�mm Ebs ..a” :$.a�: ae..E ` ti a s a SL''1; " " "'L fti: i$ uas '$'i& J // _ - ttr5•a > '$ ui as sn.$s ''�`> $ > s)" > ,6 £ /•, .�/ r• - - Rmr A` « ' - T.3RLC. 6a.°m°t a�i°.a•,ssa R6F .,.. R t 1 sY�� � ��:s4" 1 5 E � y .. rtt� -. Y « � •gams $3«b m� ��, \ -,{ / g` � 8 y i I / • � / s `L'$. `�`">as fR.ti`.��`R� �i`= � �' � li' �� // r � ` � �,. •�,�' °°erg° i � >�� �; E 1 Z ' • // EXISTING a w e` atRaeaRtaRw�y BUILDING: \ Z x J � S)iOPS S STORE #562"0 ` $ $$( $4 /.� / -' / 9 ; - - q 4 R F x i I � °. - C 150GL- NO 777- -- '„'` LOT 1 j a ffi l. ° 152,016 S.F. (APPROX.) s�._ 1 I, BLOCK 1 i� 4 / / , / / . � 516 o • 4� i4 • C i k s re ♦ y / / o x { EXISTING 6 ..... I f W SEARS 3 CONTRACT) U l Z Z J y� naa / 4 J i 1• � '�o• j ` i / > s N A� N / �\ z z bi U o �Zo a 11 U J N 444 Y Y w 0 w W U m « W�LF-Z i 0 V ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: Z z ST 1 All RM GENIA CoNTRAcTOR RORR TO BE COMPLETED EARiN•Of«t, W ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT ( 2 E f1N AL U1 D OC U ME N TS AND P OUT C A A REA r0 61 E K P T T FREE OAR M GOPHER STATE CALL ONE 71RE i1 U) W rR AND ST RA AFTE A REA TR CO LASE a oe CLUiLLl111�I11 \1 V� £ MN TOLL FREE RUCTIO2S2-1166 >RAILTRS AND STORADT A CO THE CONTRACT MIDE CLEAR DAIS ESS - _ FOR OU TLOT, TLOT C NTRA T O T O ECTOR TO PATF RYIX AT QEAR ACCE55 BEFORE CO 651-4 BEANS DT RUOCTOII ° TN R F PARCEL M O Au 1105 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DATE TWIN CITY AREA 651 -a54 -0002 DOCUMENTS YRES DATr. PEOLMIED By oT ATE/U DC A L REOU E Poaa RD/ENTS r OS /03/2011 " D Ow xAOU UOT. RE011MED '/ AIEAA REDU PROJECT N0. 3 (�/ 160633001 SHEET NUMBER 1 6101 E F ?� 7,p as y6 yy��.p?cc °s� 0 A' �niCSU < C g ® LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES L ',�x�sais I. R C DEPTH SIR DDED NNRIM OO MLCH N ALL PLANTNO REDS f L 2. MH.LCH ILL DECCUOVS TREES MIN J FOOT FAA MULCH RNG AND ALL ` g E APPLY H'iS- DER4ElfE /RAfIIC7DE SUCH AS PEEN PRROR TO MULCH ENVNIREFM TRESS TO DRIP HNE NTN 4 4REDOm HARDWOOD M APPLY 9 - PEACOp47 d �.•. 1 NSTAL SEES LANDSCAPE EDGER TMHERE TQW AREAS LIEET O • 1 ` L �� p " 94M/PERDNAL PLANTING REDS 0 \ • ♦ NSTALLATICNR°�lRtO FOR TSS PLANTING 00 RiEPARAIgI Aro S 6GLY9 S OO N PLANTM BEDE TO BE S AND GATE ARE lfMM THE lYTS ION y ES i `a o i NO M-THC M STOft A w m D ffILTRA 1 ION AREAS STSIEL. O N SEEDED WIN TM NA MN SIOI W AND eiTLiRAgN ARS R AREAS Dm MIM TYE/1NET SEED 1■R L RANT MATETRALS SHAD BE ACQUIRED FROM SOURCES UTAH 8 ..��AL JNE anaet KAFONESS ZONES 3 DR 4 Z 7. K �AL SHRM AND PERDNALS A NNUw OF IR °W EDGE OF E� j 3 a T L TO SEED AU- ° i°"REAASNO- PLACE 50 P°PL OF iM3 e �� r Kr TiFE EEMT PLANTER PAWER '33't a aG� } \ lAAAS,EETa, DG R. y #° Ak / I lk "P z U � L s a - t WaImart EEL HER � N > Lt STORE #5625 -00 :e tc: 2.0 •a ° = R C- 150- SGL -NO �3a 152,036 S.F. (APPROX.)= AM fl-N tew rs `c ss�� rxc K a grL' 1 \ 6' g L a°L � IN.n / cAi A x sc$ $ K IM x -�a \ - wad / i A f . PRELIMINARY r` [NOT FOR CONSTRUC ION Z c L aL K a E R a a �{. �py�•�?; �7� • i n�nTn \ALT [ L L wSn 'w K LL If s fLP o s e R—REHH '' E ER°$ — . " a \ ,_ /. � w / � % aas aaa \ sAUa. $.$as °i's5 .` ._ F E / / I Ei.. s RR.e to a •.. aw , " `K@ �, 08` ss Vic•, // �/ / , 1 1 U t o ss�gzu R aL > °.. ` / J. ` '`• / / // ' 1 LEGEND F H an ! :x S— TREES(TO wtA.� Q 7 .LL $ °' spa t`€ "" . 80..� ♦ / /� i /,/ C Z a act..• rK : '°. ', ® Kk 4 M Y 4Yt tbam - i 4 Y LCa'4R8R� ,- / a� E, tiR2`° a as .i. R aT:.� ac., - �'� R RO 120 ' iu Ls.. a 6 K .. FEET aLt a. igiwtx - #• *a -� '4. •• /.i // ,.''' ECJHa! Qi N , / `' / WALMART PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE Z Y' R rT i SYMBOL QTY COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT N W - k R ►• 9±R C3" N ,° / swANPw.arE(uK TrcAi ea■ U) V ` 3 a ♦ a � 7 w 1R � `iE.� 7 €„3 7 3 I. Sa P cw■HON HMCRTKNM O O A Tscx ■se Z ,= ERSTaw IJR AOCOVDE EUt 1b•G4. el■ a ` ' ,""' AunANeLwnMwE Trc:+x aa\ J N •' ,., ;, ' e'Z artR»c.sPeN r,o eoNr. Y O 1D no cart W O . ^E. C't • , - �E� N NOVY lIU(LU4 .,C (off. N � W C r �YAENTAL WlAP0.E .,U CMR Y � ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT EGO1°° V m } " GOPHER STATE CALL ONE y.� R Aa naalePNUCE r n ■\e W 0 0 z I ` , +" MN TOLL FREE 1 -800- 252 -1166 i•k Rm Prae aRr e\s n 1% co BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS �•" V TWIN CITY AREA 651- 454 -0002 F�sRCEFN Z _ cDNr. a d lLwue HAASlw '� NWawr p � W S ALIRHlEWE Oi'IRAI CYAN BURN NHONtYSCARE A CWT. ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: �"� n cart U) z ALL ML GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK 10 RE CDYPLETED (EARTI\ORII. PENEN / UnUTES. AND MAL O■AD•HG) BY THE MLETTONE DARN SIMEA b COrF1. DATE _ PROJECT DOCUMENTS OUTLOT AREA TO RE KEPT FREE O A 5N DAVLAr TRNHERS AND M( STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT ESTOE DATE FOR n � — 2.3/03/20 it OR PROJECT NO. AFTER FOR WT OW DATE N C OR R O A CONTRACTOR E OU C UOT PARCEL TO 111 T KIES LILN£TTa susMl N CONE. IGM33001 AT DO { M S S ANG D WOARED RY ST ai ATEAO C A I R[ PR T P rS s PERerNN,v. E. CUMENT AND SMPPR fEOUIRm AR/LOAQURNENiS MISlNG K(YaDLJATA! 1 � FaE 7PEpnc ourlDr. � SHEET NUMBER 4 i i 6102 I t J Y J o / o y IV 11 IL IJ 11 10 1/ 10 IY LV 1 r - _ m � j 1' f - " -_ COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROIAD 0 60 120 m s -- -- to as u , r r ga z�gg E�• > f K? ` {� I ffmsv.m'`al ° s$aa a `" e s'� n OC' ° Gi' Tw"Sie a . '3' � E H fa� s SCALE FEET f I/ `� ea s A f df tafa 4 i t fN & aGfffS `mW S�su n Rmsa. � z Mm o 5 T i f . .. .. ` �r o T - 0 111 i ;' �� Sac` ru::aarTf a si` mcpzam fftfi."�D�x L f € °v, arvnR T, tfsnxaa ��+{9v * .€ off seas�xx msnw m R ISTING \ 9 E ah m EIR m Y`aamfy Y E H" m snammaaeaf snamdawa m., .kswaa c u ..cn a S E a a a a ccaa F r n t' a s `" aaaaaESacf'° ' .r`"°°a MIDAS � ea u a u n a ESf Eag Aff gS ;sacs �x ° ou E «a u �mAA amaar aF a b.I 3 � A. n - DSm d a .aan ` \� s hf.T.a $D " u "n�+•'an maiuff el =. >a °i>�`,aatn:` :"r,'afan'aR&r.`ar SEws a au m p c a;.,S aS" f f ; F`aS$ff i`�s`e "x ` :'"ic 5 y� y yS ( y gy, C p A g xa / y f, - E R Ax aCmsR RE t6 1a y -t E a � titt4 qx s �cA % rs FcxGBYaC 6 Sl l -.cY 3 ? i $ # "`'''xAC .i"aamR°casa REUMil64 d &Ef n ha xnaam vr"af. ama . «i� Au: Aa �m .`.fo.�"aS�ewa n aa f °W arlD" « Yfs �1 e as aS.S as�aiea$S ' �5 g a...E" -4 E ::a & s.S i° u. "a ea °:ha c "caa. " c r 1" ` .cc . eta E . ane imrfin°`a" Sg m s:a °E" fS$m s B asuEmss�' SeL$SL-S'�3f '� mac nz Et. ac.,"�` T' nai€ °xm'f.'rm>�a a : auc - • �, r r .'r r 'sur an $s' ` `::'a'S a l \ x>u� r$f4m aaf.S ''rwa. a r' wuam f i, Y�ig I g �� _ y J / qe m PER a ' i \ > uas e;A 'txZS et u �a , s ns .egca aa<ae`nxS 4, s aaa xg mm s ""Am aayaxYLf$ AaEacrfi 1 e A - ■ 1123 , r aayy t ,,I�' 'Aat rxmLGtiL'mN.n py�g ` W6a "m R4yyaa AA66CCtt nhnn pp�,a m2A nY Tn aey . ny?a GYn a +an_ YZZL::aSY - :smf e:• R ` $ a = _ 9 Si L f� ma memDDf ° Stm a -� _aSG:•Li EamGGNaaL S. t f E,y tt , � . S Sn6t aii ,a:ES`s6 a ' s„ = .:'a`d `Sa;. i�"'a �aSaa� faECY$ offs dSLawv a:.ac S fa a w- nv 99LL a S"r f as T*" _ .5 . Via., AA.e of 8 x Q "" f $ aD aHL'u,9.,� >Ara a ❑ dqi g S en c .t hE" "Yga`a S` ct f Aacna vaacae aaax e e `feat hm vaYaS d S °-` O f Spa' ° ..DtsS F�' n`n a e.,1:'h.�mac_w.ea ar, h taaA.ft c a ppa,aLL LL ]M� JiJ! y ,� '�aal'umfEYF��AC�a�' 0aS34. h iYbi 'x� {•M f ... L'ARSSta GG n _ 4'im�..t.ALGm Ga10 =YGa L.9'6GLah 6 •�.. s« LY &Ctr. 4a8Y.: �f Ef�A.a_ ci E.`'��'aEfEfg � aa.aER � � "aS Fawfmm a oua aces. a S� as ,n F ma.. > Da xN.t S /.. .r 6.°.tl m xcaiav mDaaA:s° - m m- r " "a•u e ai:`f a'ts 'i cc4`naw "> "' `c/ 1; ,, ; " °• ` m T os r s• ° E & 5rw su.' c ;R ' 2 "J a'eala. as - g.� a scs. c vatic r x ,'�•` S'•- s$ r ..6s""mx"'C"' •:ss FF sa axmna AJt y�,ypy aS d,"_,�` sncma,•~ssaLClaa f Lea M, M, ¢g f LAAAW 8l.at La" L ItSaSpalti R >abia8 �a L R i y a � s � a anG r i '_ mGL 4 °F u `D -S � ❑ '• x� S� eae n cc FF u$ea`�`r..`au ° • ss¢¢s� ac as e."s mS 5 � ° +�4Y_CeGYmSv �a nr�.W �u f bfstl 5 a ms a e i'.hSAk aYt6m C m emY " ✓~ataf 5 a - ' A; I r, •--•, k 4" '�% a Y macS7`cca Scs° gRSea$ca a su ra. °xr: aS ELEfSF :,°.Ea..ax ([`;L� aai'ifa`a €:au p eM `c 5 �`'a a xnx`Ti f� Sasam a ns• - 9 «wnr a�ak�aey� �aamsR..s anrR .mav d 4. r mas -?rm °eS` m sc -_ .. umamE ec a°maaaaa�>r s EmR w s«r as aSa as r Era. L ' a f �� as � m 3fafafa EN�Aa a xR arc aF " ae ce S rra "f'mm f `` EamAa 'Ex'i` rk rn tit :.g t er °f 1H 'aT i `"ahaSE$fa`E ° tea :aam xt ec : "` ac fa $elm eeT• aaiS #e m` "sESf Ka `�mnaf 'E`k m n ss ay m aYa6 Fny D mAnNLae 'nT4LH baLGamYC n tn'l: aart G b /y a ac ac �b ga.aE��` n Elf rg: rx .anpw� asR�RDagAAgRS>:nYas u,c of R bn ufE�f� ��`� ` fma xas cza c eta flu * A T (\\ a Des �' s$ f F 3 m S aL S.."s: if�Ra $ R<.. 3m ° -c. a ma in : m s a sa f`cs ..�nc x`v » ` d >3 'ftcawY.. «ttcamaY t - � n R w ina.e react aaa " #s f$�wmf • x° "aS &p` 1 -m d xac s mssaumma.;ama mfn � f JJ Aa.anfaEAeam, m � - a 3hFRYz fGffa:Am a `f fffan�a ��r s .a :�asE:c�da >.sss. "a�L�_'.� L LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES m$f$fL� ALL DECOMOUS TREES 1H 3 FOOT DA. Y .C' &au&ua,ac x L y a L g e y s e y S p `s ip a s a¢ cs `M " . EE Aat•`ff. ane m miAY:anaan Dash n ` 1. PLACE P OEP1N'rFDR'D HNVMOOO MULCH M Ml PIANir/G BEDS q ;d'y IC A. tae na�t '(. ` 2 MUEA1 MULCH RING AM ALL a s j L. EDE ` a sEMHg a�fbmn -- S 6 E�E171AED1 11E2S.S TO DIIY LINE NTH a 94MMO MARDWOM III Ski �vA S fs_sf_ APPLY PRE -EWIVI ENT PMOKWE SUCH AS MIEDI PNOt TO MULCH g c a .F ! axaam a>wmA aa aac L aAmm1T � aEEE.K. < V ; r\ ~ - y ` aYC" l$�s: 1 INSTALL STEL LAN EDGER 1HERE ILM AREAS III Tz1ou a Y "fx.tRFL00 "as"r"'au '< ar6e K PLANTI ems o sl 1 TI I 1 AND YAW AREAS WIT > x . Q LAMSC E N RE DETAU FOR PLAMHC O EkD PRF}•AM AND E INSTALLATION a,rmETI1S Z m ,`\ ( ��� `• }::r ` S ALL "TING BEWITHIN U&I OF 711E P '/ (9 ' y ` No 10iHPI STORMWA� AND WXTR�i,Tl � OR AREAS g 3 V `' _ �rJ � -. s :,»m NTH KAnYE/11Ei s® nx — r. NES 3 OR BE ACOJEED FROM 9"m NTIN T. KEEP ALL SERUM A PERENNIALS A MINDAIM OF Ir OFF ETNE OF PAWdT Z / d SOD ALL f] TOP 0E SEED PI AREAS ALL UN PH OTHER R NOTCA RESTORATION 500 OAON" OF 17301_ USE 2 AREAS - WE RESiV 1R1H RAUIS ! � A ~ rK,s lvwnNC AREA /100,� a U F{ _ LEGEND ❑ Z 4jp }ra`r; CJ lk / C C EIDSiNGi SITomv,." /� // WINE /WET IEEO MIK rR LLI W Z z j1 •rte • PHASE 1 PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE O U UJ C:) 3 A SYMBOL OTY sWRP COMA NAME SIZE ROOT N } � i wMMDNHA«eENn xs sae U J N , 11 Ps ACCOIbf EW zs cx eae LY Y � _ ; }DECw101A1 NITTAAN 1�AZf ANPtE iS fX r a e O ► ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 1 11 ® uRn ASPF „, U GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1- 800 -252-1166 •� q NoRr sAx uuc nD coN* m Q BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS 0 — cP A e ,m coMr W F- Z E TWIN CITY AREA 651 -454- 0002 DE6O1A 1 ^ y U) * Htix,AUS ePRUCE rKr aa, V D 11 RED — rHT eae Z Z W a ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: _ a F ER4REB z 5 ALL raR GENERAL WHTIIACT011 NO DI N( TO BE CilE7ED (EARIHN'XM, U 5 FlNK U1M AND rINAL C A AREA BY T PT MILESTONE FREE OAR N BuRNUM CO- T PRO. LER AND STO TS E AFTE AREA KEPT O TR P EST E AT DWAR rUS11 HDEET91A11E Tww"om p mar DATE 5 i Q AFTER RA CONTRACT MIL DALE FOR 1Z7] tA.AO q owrr 03/03/2011 "OR OUTLOT. O ACTO L CONTRACTOR TO FARM aEALL ACCESS pREL1MINARY "•"� d AFTER MILESTONE D AATE HROI OF OUTLO A PROWDE PERMIT FOR ryT� Tye �TT� !.7•t SPKEA o coMr PROJECT NO. DOCUMENTS AND SR•F'P REQUIRED BY STAIE/LOCAL RECUWEYFRT$ NOT FOR CONS RUT.. E EON �' °""A• H ODHf 160533001 WI WTlOt. a KAIe FOE RSTER n oDNT SHEET NUMBER aI,Iw PSxRIw NAO.ErED xaAN H GOAT. 6103 MnSS"IO KOe0.0 wTNe n ODHi I [ J ♦ ."� o / o Y IV II IL IJ I♦ ID I/ IO IY ev LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES _.r. __ " __ O ____ / J. _— I - -} --- • - r+-- -- t. w ""----- --------- -- ---- --- is wa r DEPTH s o lr+mm HARDWOOD MULCH N ALL rLAxn+o BEEN ____,��____�_____- ______ I A - -- j_ •� "-'- •..y1. ,, •�-< -- _ --- - �.-- --� - --- 2 YlILC11 ALL GEOA TREES ON 3 NOT DNA. TALON RHO AND ALL Ni n Y 66Hkµ _ _ I - Gam..._ — _._ -_� -' -- Ol1O _— _'_'___Awa�1 �� �� - 1 APPLY EFX CM10t TO DRIP UK MEN 4' STMEDOED P RIOR T O M LCH o $�i � ° e.!`w Y°Y K�aki.°n�°iKKa�.3iim rrr k a�� i a, � K{� ° � \ 1 h I t � _ #`' Ek x€$ \ a O t�- � �.�.,,.,�� �`� �� F mlctxT rveBlmE wa As PROBE PRIOR to wAa+ SY n xhz nnsa � Y g z x I , ca. ai bx �KK n i!d H = �.. i ; -- ; , -, � �- r1r1 , rrrr�rr 7 IT «\ 3. R1STAlAL�IANDSCAPE MGM WERE YEW ARCAS MEET 1I-]• $�YxinLYaa$ b i b E4 t (is'b`$ Y6Ex$ ` $ Y . :'. �% /� * / 7 / - jr ` <,v • stR46 Al PLANTING Bros Yef I l{���� ] JF sraY s Y p¢� # �z c , ���y r � . , e ♦ YS i c m tl#e.... ` $# unk s,� { # .�.. Y � 7 'S / / y `p .X; • t °F S �LEs LL Y Ylfa s Y�4 x eY tu.YL Y°1 cb.� 1 / I ' KY �a y 1 6 k A, TI T`L`S C �.t N D CH PEOETAILS FOR k EMS y V11 YA KKR ? F' I Stc.ai4 u p a _ / < 1 i / 1 O . ION DETAILS PLANTING B PREPREPARATION 1 AND O � •T., '� �i�Y & CY/ • A , �� � s Au wwTra Ims AAn TtNS AREAS Wnnl nt tuts aF -T N i���y g ��� .•p E+ n Pt:B�a3 a4rSi nsvo..n I e >` _s,� ru i�s.t '�• '•�' .. �* �y !' • Cas1RUC TO BE RRIGA7E ON AUTOMATIC gR SYSTE i la. n C n LI Y ° n x i 4 * ..� ' h 1 ' aawG z _Gas n4Y Ur.� ° nun4 4nr ssY �f l �• ,/ C: ,\ ♦ fi t i ' SEWO NTH MA744' ET RID MIX PLANT p.M w f; # kx._ YRAEkY E3 k Xk YLL $ R Kj.� ibA,(sYY ' \I f AMRIM3 SHALL BE A ACQ1Rm SOURCES fAOY WllplltlE ARM , HMOlQ9 101ES ] dt 4 Y a 4✓�W Li PLANS OF 0D Ob PA1E]ENT KEEP AND PERENNIALS A MINIMUM OF 1B OFF COGS OF z 7. IQ ALL Si i�� B K 8 nY }.� T � S y, 4 , ry mo t' '.#s$°Yat &r�.'nA' ,. i4ur. YKa #da tgy `�` 5 $ ✓ ! 1 t" %� �'•• ��� _... _ P � 1 YtY SK wux ktlk, n P L ..Y°x 'aLt CYLhl: ,4aY6 R a6nLG�ya hfiY» R t:kL b nGix / f J f B. 90D All MW UEFSS OTNERWSE NOTED. PLACE 94R 4 - + Y _a s.mnAS�$a •4 �Ar .4 Yac Y C .n s. a:<,v S > W YID All F,,.� S AREAS - S P LACE S .... cxa.x EXISTING s � ✓/ / .s STING ,TOrF ♦ !.i Y.•k Y PP{A! # $L Yh tJ[I' & #` .ak.Lcpza < i7 gRYWn k p' laub� t tin> t( f _ ait� �Lx Yx K� p l KOHL sss...z ° a - �' .k rri �n - n <TM• DLL 4 c wsa$x �� / 7 a YY bw �EAwib SC�`Y yp E r i M � . � i S �! ED mkb: i ° $ Yt YSL 6�L a a z $ E E a aE '$ 'Y am Yci"il$Ca = ,: j ❑ I UMMM M � � : y .� -' "� �- % ♦ ka an AW«w is i# b z `LYns aaa aA i RE ° osi xKC g E xs .Y.SE rwcai f x i ac l w a e z $° �Y � C 9 Sx�Y Y � f ' ♦ � � 4 ` ; �'/ . #Yi GAS A ffi6IIYRY # YS 5� I n L k � `� ' , J _`_� t ♦ � ♦ k' P w6L5niyyyy Ya P Gtxi$ s >a LK {. "- �'ppp�yYy yL ° 3nYpgkgky4 lJ f� ♦ p S 4xC ?'}i6f�S 4 °#b "....... _b..L n ! ° "` A 4— > � > aLi u LS niL..°4tY4 A °'..°iY SSSa.WY° Y.aaF:Y Y xa saaKm Y.T{a4 $ 4 ` .r,Yia €.x I -a . assgca�Y iamYY a°£a`3 bTa 4 pz Y � c..q I ,�,EjE Xp aw. rxt$zc$iaC • :ak '�\ ! / !' ♦ a ' $ $ i $ s Ye"E i,. It{K ,.n"5I Am. »Sf.SxC.i4YX Yn .,, L g RxGa p aa% f %: . aa .... iMa . •. : b A Y - xKn - i 4II4S � �f PRELIMINARY y .S a CY L iYa `u�.l�$'! h a �gy �"u � `Y�+ k$` ' %' ♦ 12 ..Wti Y P° 3 .y "�. s !n > '42.€ Sn84_i'Y G ; �° D Y 486.SS�tiYxibi'S8.6Lak4nbii SG +l � O oW Z .°. $.kYY f .' [ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Yal�gn�k.Ya.. � "�/ n iinx aae nn kiL[,o�i i yy,,,� Y a L 4 . l t Y L .x a a s°°'a'alf' sm #e at - Him t1�faJ� nS °aY 4 at.tlK �Y • � gO t Yy x�Ya 88 iwpp.�yiY e� � � ♦ / ♦ b St L 8 8tC YnYKt L.°.6 3' #� '•L L I• b \ (�� / a i f ' % ab zuafas$.cat:YY kcewu $ °!Y +aY6 pl C j w #K @P.n P<Y i Yi$'Y �, ax Y •.a. a m. <� i ! g� t� yyY�� rG, � $� al Y Y k ze' �L E � A . C#'� ny F ,•A• \ �( a 4 ky�ag:UBt SC xL➢4.:CbY4�Kn>x !.° aLS.xR�94 "°. � Ybi4i -8L i -K L' «• �' asq FX i.iF NMk 11 0. a .. x,. waiaA aiF.T. awxa. cY M aio ccb�k " '.F:' I i ♦ / , /, �R ` ' a.Ye I: _.R�' ` k.... Y Y !s m. TrxY. # #kaY r.. �.. is a�ccaa °""'uE t zz#aeaY# t IT, l z m iL..TJiE m x{ Y MI >+ A YAAYLln# dL# i Y Y x #Y k ..... YSk b°YY LtxKh L4k S 4 C # \ / / p ' {.A E p - . a 60ES ..-Mif i� SSC . Y� �.... ` KYO Y ° c Y ° W.4f b WW Yw . ♦� a14T..�i y i6 h nh g 4. wLyYp. yY p ®yg8y x.. pL� 'S7J tiD'4PG TA YLy���a�n$�bi i6 � �= r � �� �Yxt ,,., i �� i�l<�.�4 W6LYih.iW.°n..i�L�eCG. eCLj�x1K.L '. ii.Fn � '$$l�lnK'{Mi °u 1' E`"c L ° . ° a�.u b i�a$Li ° ¢L'Tx Saki#° � °� sa 'u�Y#w c.,. Sr` . / stilt R!!T J aaSY°�s<. r"ia�u 0$$ a J� xiK t Y6M, x a iY ip�iy pR pc all C LEGEND w r8acnpy[ � Y��tli° x S4 L4 $$8 Y°4nivAY��¢�tW1 LL � - `$ ° C g 5Yp6 6 #AGGwir Y°f n EIaBTx1O TAM PO NUMA E Q p i ca "iYU.aG Cam. a'n �. w .°a►'�Y>.ea�L nYe..a.�.aak`Yf .r.KY / v� ' � �I.'tu s / / Q ?�g°xa'�9$^� $ &�Y� i :� .�/ // raTrvcirmaEEnru ( rk M um— � � L r Matltl'a`LiL Yii#4cn�ua Li�Y#Y��n �°xb�$ �n�n L�Cbdl Yua � / /// Fa0. ¢6Y�tL'uLSS T fiia .a�Ya ... /// // GJLI PHASE 1 PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE k4 SYMBOL OTY COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT Z In w SXYIp MRMRiE OIK ].S CAL ■ { R z $$`•�"$�"`` / / / : t IaIMDr]IHAbO1BRRr ]s vL Tai Z z a �K€f ; =eu ' / // n ACCaADE nAR 2 S u1 B a IL U) W H n° / / i , ' ovERSTdtr AIrtuYR LAZE rtVtE ] 5' CAI- 8. i O O / oEClouDls Q' O a / / OUNUxi ABPPN na COHT. > - ® eIRGH HRa,P t - rl. C-T U ` / TWIRY faA LIAG Pia tANT Y Y —."TA' GWaA1RE nR —T. w O 4t •�/ A / 4AGt NAIB SPquCE .'M Bai w 0 N I,• ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT a mPie .H IL.■ () m 4 GOPHER STATE CALL ONE REV �� O BEFORE CONSTRUCT- 25 VIIPtltlllf a curt. ��J 1% ~ � � TMTN CITY AREA 651 454 - 0002 DruRF Y1.6N10.eratOUE n carrt. V II L) I 4 ' _ DocwooD a Hart. Z z 0 0, ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: • RFN "'"FA FE OONT 1: _ wnzr ''A^ 2 All W GENORAL CONTRACTOR OOEO TO BE COMPLETED (EA ODRx. HSt .All WFRaFEA n CONF. V / / _ FINAL UTIURES AMD FINAL GRADING) BY TALE MILESTONE DATE IN .CT DOGRIEMTI .1.1 AEA TO BE RERT FREE OF UOB 'T RIAQfrED 5UBN1 CONT_ BATE IRAAERS AND ST AGE AFTER INC CONTRACT MtESTONC DATE FOR 91aiUDl PE Af HHVt THE 0UTLOT. W. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PRONDE CLEAR ACCESS N' xOBOL -Ym n CONT. OJ 03 11 FOR OUTLOT Cp1TRACT TO THE SPECI C PARCEL AT ALL RMES PROJECT N0. AFSER MILESTONE DATE PIROIASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVOS PERMIT DONCNIS ANO SNi'P REQUWED BY STATE/LOCAL wouwELENTS 16063]001 f,R SPECl1C QIIi.OT. SHEET NUMBER 6104 I m d PRELUVENARY 0 L I>t P Tom. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION s , T / J J \ N r - r ¢ r a u• r-r I ''' • = ?_ I BEST FACE OF SHRUB/ TOP OF SHRUB ROOTBALLS TO BE r / �- ::fir a _• ';� FRONT OF PLANTING BED. PLAN I ' - 2 HIGH WITH SOIL MOUNDING UP TO THE TOP OF R PLAN ROOTBALL C E LE FOR SPA T + } z �rw SCHEDULE FOR f r Two Twr�Aiuw� } } t + 2 WHQ/ USED IN MASSES- PRUNE ALL i i PA � 'Yom PLAN MASS/HE GHT.d A CHIEVE A UNIFORM D it CllNiANQ FI,CM 2 j 4 5 3 . 4 MINIMUM MULCH COMPACTED � SPECIFED.yy� Y ' 4 EXCAVATE ENTIRE BED SPECIFIED FOR tt wns u w '� " •�� a GROUNDCOVER 80. 4q 5. 4 MM ❑ MUM OF TOPSOIL TO BRING TO IgE { t nLANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING PLAN FINISHED GRADE (SEE GRADING PLAN). " PLANTING SOIL AS 6- SPECIFI NDTE: WHEN GROUND - I COVERS AND SHRUBS USED IN r `"��� I— _ l;r. — I I • MASSES ENTIRE BED TO BE AMENDED KITH PLAN TING SOIL MIX AS SPECIFIED. k' g , , , WIDTH VAPoES . SEE PLANS �_ 8 5 I , • 7. SCARIFY ROOTBALL SIDES AND w s yTREE PLANTINGIPAVER SECTION - I I =1 I I� 7 ' a 5 � � 5 y � i � 12• N�E yy , r TW. J5 13 z I li_"_LI _LI € ion �r r nSHRUB / GROUNDCOVER PLANTING p PLANTER ISLAND NOTES G 1 \ /SECigI Mft ��A� x 1. CROWN ISLANDS O 5:1 SLOPES (OR AS SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE \ "/6 PLANS). 2. CH EAR 70NE: 36' MIN. FROM BACK OF CURB TO CENTER OF NEAREST 5 SHRUB, CLEAR ZONE SHALL CONTAIN 4 CONTINUOUS MULCH GR TURF, SEE p 2 3 PLANS. 0 3 . z m 1 2" MIN VERTICAL CLEARMICE, TOP OF CURB TO TOP OF MULCH. 1 TOP OF 5HRUB HUDTBALLS TO I* PLANTED I - 2• HIGH WITH SOIL MOUNDING UP TO THE TOP OF FOOTBALL Y 2. WHEN USED IN MASSES- PRUNE ALL SHRUBS TD • EXCAVATE A CONTINUOUS 24 DEEP PIT (FROM TOP OF CURB) FOR ACHIEVE A UNIFORM MASS /HEIGHT. ENURE 4" MULCH OR TOPSOIL (MIN.) MIX LENGTH AND WIDTH OF ISLAND & BACOY U CH BEST FACE OF SHRUB/ L WITH APPROVED PLANTING 1 4• MINIMUM OF HARDWOM BARK MUL COMPACTED OR = PROTECT AND RETAIN ALL CURBS AND BASE COMPACTED SUBCRADE TO GROUNDCOVER TO FACE AS SPECIFIED. M 5 REUA FOR STRUC SUPPORT OF CURB SYSTEM (TVP). FRONT OF PLANTING BED- } } 4 EXCAVATE ENTIRE BED SPECIFIED FOR GROUNDCOVER --) `nt AIT 6 POD SURFACE COURSE (TYP.) SPECS WHEN PDRCOLAnON UTILIZE RAIESr 2 PER HOUR OR LESS.PER MNDOT REFER TO PLANT + + T BED. Q SCHEDULE FOR SPACING 5. 4 MINIMUM OF TOPSOIL TO BRING TO FINISHED GRADE i 1 MAX. 3 ;•....' '. - 4• GRA BASE COURSE (TW.) �1 PLANTED PARKING LOT ISLANDS I MEDIANS + + + + (SEE GRADING PLAN) w F _ SOIL t L f f - j - I'r� A • . - wn LAN 6. GROUND- COVERS AND SHRUBS USED IN MASSES ENTIRE BED TO 'R ,� a J; h,-; H� • �_ °x : ry.•�RD ` "Ffi v•,..J _• r.¢ Nw �cae PAVING CAR DOOR SPECIFIED E AMENDED WITH PLANTING SOIL MIX AS SEE ! \ ` l • ` : 1 , . `., DETAILS _ - -•• I + � t3 ._ O . 7. SCARIFY ROOTBALL SIDES AND BOTTOM. U u \ -�V , / TO CENTER OF FOR 5 ` ` i ` ADJACENT J� { SCUT BACK SLOPE TO PROVIDE A FLAT SURFACE FOR () � ` PAVEMENT `�- / ST SHRUB PLANTING. Q SECTION —� �— ; ( _ a T s a a Qs Z PROVIDE CONTIGUOUS " 'III Q UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 12• YIN. IY GRAVEL BASE y —.__ —1 I I_ COURSE BELOW�1 =I i CONCRETE BUFFER -- J km r BASE COURSE AND < _ - TIf 3-Cr ABOVE 12• _ I I� _ .. _ cS EXTENSION OF ARIOIG - I I I I '.v - _ .: - {...., I I'- - cS PAVEMENT BASE P 14A1D- Sff DRAB '- - I I_ Z z Z NOTE: SEE LANDSCAPE BERM DETAIL FOR TREE PLANTING. COURSE 2 t3' - � I � I- 7 6 O U O TO OF i CENTER p t CON ----- - -_1 NEAREST SHRUB F 12• � Z 1n J ( V� CRETE BUFFER r P. U V CD ! B Z 1 SHRUB I GROUNDCOVER PLANTING ON A SLOPE w O LO WIN. «t R MVE,¢M 6 PARING 14AID_ mm-E RETAIL 2 J yA O 1 V U z - 1. INSTALL CONTINUOUS MULCH BED ADJACENT 70 PARKING SPACES AS SHOWN. Z _ — a MULCH SHALL BE MIN. 4 DEEP. w NO POP -UP IRRIGATION HEADS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 24 OF A PARKING u) _IO z N ANY SIDE ' EUrourFrvaasw SPACE O. 3 v,C SM[EI fJ.pN e,eivmo iorw TK>•4 L CURB OR PARKING LOT EDGE. DATE v acRwwccoourt 1 CU,PVC/$NEEOEON) MT: Iwawnw IRRIGATION CONDUIT PARKING SPACE 1 CURB PLANTING O3 03 Z011 PROJECT N0. BFLIIDI { I eEt'oA Im 160633001 J 4 ( SHEET NUMHER 6105 A5AC<-lT PREFK METAL FR-05T® CLASS C.ORNIGE ILLLHINAT© EIPS 516NA6E TENANT` y t DEGORATNE - ANOD. ALLM. PR METAL HRUC GMJ LI6M 5TOREFRON7 CANOPY FRCNT PAIN. METAL GGRNIGE -ILLUMINATED 516hAEE EIFS TENANT -- - -- — - -- -- J - - -- - - - - - -- PAINTED HOL- 0H DEC40 ATiVE IN METAL BRICK C-W METAL DOOR L!e+ T -- CANOPY 51 D� ANT - PARAPET BEYOND _ EIF5 LLJMINATED 5 r TE I LOA: IN6 DOCK cw BRICK 5cj;-=—=N1 REAR TYPICAL ELIVATIONE-, - MAJOR ANCHOR � ins. • � IBS° I ; .� IL .LMINATED ' °REFIN. �TAL 16FiT s1&4AEE CORN E - - - - — BACKLIT TENANT TENANT TENANT`S T ENAN T M r_K j - - _ (>t BASE IT CANVAS PRET METAL ANOD_ ALLM. AWV1�165 CANOPY 5T FRONT SIDE DECORATIVE EI=5 ILLUMINATED L cwgT SI&W46E PTUFIK METAL CORNICE TENANT TENANT y TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT - _ BRICK °KEPI". MEETAL PAIN -M HOLLOW CANVAS c'm CANOPY �ICETAL DOOR AWN65 51 DE AR I TYP I G AL EL�YATI ON5 -PAD SU I LD I N6 Strategic Plan Brooklyn Center 2 011 Our Mission To ensure an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust Our Values Excellence and quality service delivery We believe that service to the public is our reason for being and strive to deliver quality services in a highly professional and cost - effective manner. Ethics and integrity We believe that ethics and integrity are foundation blocks of public trust and confidence and that all meaningful relationships are built on these values. Visionary Leadership and Planning We believe that the very essence of leadership is to be visionary and to plan for the future Fiscal Responsibility We believe that fiscal responsibility and prudent stewardship of public funds is essential for citizen confidence in government. Cooperation and Teamwork We believe that the public is best served when departments and employees work cooperatively as a team rather than at cross purposes. Open and Honest Communication We believe that open and honest communication is essential for an informed and involved citizenry and to foster a positive working environment for employees Professionalism We believe that a commitment to ethical values and continuous improvement is the mark of professionalism. We are committed to applying this principle to the services we offer and to the development of our employees. 1 Strategic Plan Brooklyn Center 2011 Strategic Goals 1. We will ensure a safe and secure community 2. We will aggressively proceed with implementation of City's redevelopment plans 3. We will stabilize and Improve residential neighborhoods 4. We will positively address the community demographic makeup and increasing cultural diversity 5. We will continue to maintain and upgrade City infrastructure improvements 6. We will respond to increased public awareness and interest in environmental sustainability and green community issues Ongoing Goals 1. We will continue to provide streamlined, cost effective quality services with limited resources 2. We will ensure the financial stability of the City 3. We will move toward maintaining or lowering the level of the City's property taxes 4. We will ensure the city's influence at the legislature 5. We will Improve the image of the City with citizens and those outside of the City's borders 6. We will ensure the City drinking water is high ug ality and that the storm water is properly managed strategic plan 2011 draftl.docx 2 r� 2011 LAND USE 44� PLANNING VVORKSHOPS, =11-.' N V, ... . .... .. ... .... FOR LOCA GO VERNMENT OFFI Appointc4, Elede4, Staff — A ND I NTERESTED CITIZENS NEW in 2011 Storwater Management 101 for Local Leaders (in Developing Communities and Redeveloping Urban Communities) Strategies for Expanding Your Tax Base Reg ul a ting Urban & Suburban Agriculture: Chickens, Community Gardens, Farmers Markets & More Land Use Decisions in Southeastern Minnesota Building Enduring Communities Take advantage of affordable & convenient options Half-day workshops Greater Minnesota sites Programs customized for specific regions Sp onsore d Co- sponsors: A Minnesota Association of Minnesota Counties Initiative Foundation League of Minnesota Cit Metropolitan Council M innesota Association of Townships Minnesota Regional Development Organizations - — — — --_---------- le, fc o General Information ..................................... 1 Core Programs Basics of Planning & Zoning .............................. 2 Beyond the Basics ..... ............................... 2 Your Role as Planning Commission Member. . ................. 3 Advanced Zoning for Professional Planners ................... 3 Special Focus Programs So You Want (or Need) to Rewrite Your Zoning Ordinance? ....... 4 Strategies for Expanding Your Tax Base ..................... 4 Stormwater Management 101 ............................ 5 Managing New & Existing Shoreland Development .............. 5 Land Use Decisions in Southeastern Minnesota ................ 6 Building Enduring Communities . . ............. ........... 6 Home Occupations: A Growing Concern ..................... 7 Regulating Urban & Suburban Agriculture ... ....... ....... 7 Faculty Information ... .................. ....... - - - . .8-10 Workshop Sites ......... ............................... 11 Registration ......................................... 12-13 This program exceeded my expectations and then some! I plan to attend other GTS workshops in the future and would encourage other local government representatives to do so as well Bill Langenbacher Silver Creek Township, Planning & Zoning Planner educational events — Knowledge to Action GTS is a non-profit organization dedicated to helping those who provide services to Minnesota citizens and communities meet current needs for knowledge and skills, plus anticipate and prepare for changes to come. We have worked with pollicyrnakers, staff and appointed officials from all levels of government and all types of nonprofit agencies—and their collaborators in associations, business, higher education and community groups—since 1976. N E RA L I N FO RMATI 0 We know it's not business as usual. In fact, much of government is re-looking at current practices, re-evaluating priorities, and exploring ways to streamline service delivery. Our advisory committee believes this is an excellent time to address future issues in land use planning as well, and these workshops are the perfect resource for this effort. Explore new ways of doing things. Gain information, tools and resources to put needed practices in place so that you're ready to move ahead when opportunities present themselves. We know budgets are tighter than ever, and we all need to make every dollar count. This year's series includes more half-day workshops and additional locations to make programs more convenient and affordable: • Check out offerings in Arden Hills, Bloomington, Brainerd, Little Falls, Northfield, St. Cloud, St. Paul and Shoreview. • Support from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources reduces the registration fee for several workshops. • A partnership with APA Minnesota enables GTS to present a program for professional planners which offers AICP CM credits. Finally, we can bring programs to you! We invite you to work with your neighboring communities to hold a workshop in your area designed to cover your selected topics. Options include current offerings as well as Basic Traffic Impacts on Land Use, Comprehensive Planning, Spotlight on Subdivisions, and Site Planning Basics for Non- Design Professionals, which are not part of this year's series. Contact Carol Schoeneck (cschoeneck@mngts.org or 651-222-7409 x205) to discuss your options. PROGRAM FEATURES • Accomplished faculty with extensive backgrounds in both planning and instruction • Focus on current issues and timely information • Practical content designed by a committee of planning experts and local officials • Opportunities for in-depth study and hands-on application + Extensive handouts and reference materials assembled to make your job easier CORE & SPECIAL FOCUS PROGRAMS Core Programs cover basic issues related to all cities, counties and townships regardless of size or location. As they have been designed to build upon each other, participants are encouraged to attend them in sequence. Special Focus Programs cover specific topics of interest to jurisdictions addressing particular situations or issues. All program content is continually revised and updated. WHO SHOULD ATTEND? Members of planning commissions, boards of adjustment and appeals, and governing bodies in Minnesota cities, counties and townships. Also valuable for members of other advisory commissions, housing and redevelopment authorities, staff, real estate professionals, and others working in areas related to specialized workshop topics. Workshops targeted to individuals with certain levels of experience/expertise are so noted to help you determine which course(s) are best for you! VISIT WWW.MNGTS.ORG FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND UPDATES 1 R PROGRAMS Basle of n in Zoning FACULTY: Richard Thompson and Eric Hedtke This workshop covers the nuts & bolts of planning, zoning & subdivision regulation. Participants learn how planning and zoning is developed and where they fit into the process. How do the different "players" maximize their impact? Among topics to be addressed are: • The history, how the system has gotten to where it is today, the authority and limits to planning and zoning • The basic land use and zoning tools: comprehensive plans, zoning and subdivision ordinances, amendments, permits, enforcement • Legal basics: avoiding litigation, what is "due process," what is a taking, conducting public hearings, making findings of fact, and understanding the 60 -day rule • Who participates in the planning & zoning process; YOUR role, responsibilities and opportunities • Hands -on simulations of actual planning and zoning dilemmas • Hot issues, answers to your questions Audience: Designed for those new to land use planning or interested in a review of the fundamentals. Wednesday, March 9 - St. Cloud Thursday, April 7 - Bloomington 9:00 AM – 4:30 PM (check -in 8:30 am) Registration Fee $125 /person Beyond The Basis QfPlatltlinq & ot)lr) FACULTY: Phil Carlson and Desyl Peterson Participants learn how planning and zoning tools are used to deal with a wide variety of develop- ment issues, and obtain an in -depth review of the planning process. This workshop covers: • A quick review of planning history, comprehensive planning, and zoning tools • Innovative ways to guide land use and development, from PUDs and performance zoning to design guidelines and "cutting edge" applications • Sustainability – what it is and how to apply sustainable principles to planning and zoning • The environmental review process – EAWs, EISs, and AUARs: tools to expedite careful review of complex projects • Detailed discussion of zoning tools to handle various development issues • The planning process in depth —from proper legal notice to development of findings of fact • Legal issues in more depth: How to implement the comprehensive plan in zoning and subdivi- sion ordinances? What to require for variances? When to grant conditional uses? When to use interim use permits? How to treat nonconforming uses? When to require easements? • Case studies — actual urban, suburban and rural situations! • Answers to your questions on community zoning issues Audience: For those who have a solid general knowledge of the planning process (1 -2 years on Council, Board or Zoning /Planning commission) or who have attended "The Basics." Tuesday, April 19 - St. Cloud 9 :00 AM - 4:30 PM (check -in 8:30 AM) Registration Fee: $125 /person 2 C ORE PRGRAMS -- Ml YOUr kOIC a5 Plannirly COMMiSSiOD MCMbe-r FACULTY: John Shardlow As a Planning Commission member, you contribute hours of unpaid time to your community. Have you discovered that serving in this capacity is a bit more challenging than anticipated? This workshop will focus on what you need to know to be successful in this important position. You'll learn practical tips that can make the difference between results and regrets. Topics include: • Keeping the "Big Picture" in mind • Setting significant (but realistic) Commission goals • Preparing an annual work program • Changing non-productive patterns of work • Forging healthy relationships with elected officials and staff (Plus ... what to do if those relationships are unhealthy!) • Ways to facilitate public participation in the planning process • Effective tools & techniques (planning report models and findings of fact designed to complement one another, primer on parliamentary procedure) • Handling controversial issues Audience: For members of City, County, Township Planning Commissions; also valuable for members of Boards of Adjustment and Appeals and other advisory commissions. Tuesday, March 22 - St. Paul - 8:30 AM - 12:30 Pm (check-in 8:00 AM) Thursday, June 30 - Little Falls - 1:00 — 5:00 Pm (check-in 12:30 Pm) Registration Fee: $60/person A4vance_4 Platllnin-] & ZOOft)� fOV Pt RIXIOC_6 Co-sponsored by APA Minnesota; Application for AICP CM credits in process. FACULTY: John Shardow and Joel Jarnnik Designed in response to demand for in-depth offerings for practitioners, this training workshop updates and expands the highly evaluated program offered in 2010. Participants will: • Benefit from a rapid-fire review of the fundamental principles and key legal issues. • Receive an update on variances (including the Krummenacher case and pending legislative amendment), conditional use permits & interim use permits • Gain an in-depth understanding of the importance and specifics of an effective and complete public record • Learn how to both prepare and enforce development agreements, with special emphasis on dealing with defaults, stalled projects and successor developers • Explore ways to conduct more effective community participation (e.g., visual preference surveys, using new technology while maintaining a legal foundation for decision making) • Review what's involved in developing better tools such as form-based and performance based codes, code amendments to minimize discretionary permits • Hear the latest on key recent court cases that affect local planning and results to date of the legislative session • New feature: This program will include a section titled Your Hot Topics which will cover content and questions identified as priorities on a survey to be completed ahead of time by registrants. Audience: Planning professionals serving in staff or consultant positions; targeted to those with at least two years of professional planning experience. Thursday, April 7 - St. Paul 8:30 AM - 12:30 Pm (check-in 8:00 AM) Registration Fee: $60/person 3 IMINEEkl- SPECIAL FOCUS P So You Want Nee - b Rewrfte Your Zoning Or inance? FACULTY: Jean Coleman, Suzanne Rhees, Carolyn Braun and land use attorney to be determined Zoning ordinance rewrites can be overwhelming, and frankly scary. Zoning is the most powerful tool that local governments have for implementing their land use vision and comprehensive plan. Comprehensive plan updates often trigger zoning changes to meet consistency requirements. Join us for a clarifying and calming journey through the ordinance rewrite process. Whether your city is considering a zoning rewrite for reasons of consistency or because you recognize your code has grown old and outdated, this workshop is for you. Topics include: • How do you tell if your zoning ordinance is out -of -date? What are common problems and solutions? • Who are your zoning code 'customers' and how can you serve them? • Should you consider a comprehensive rewrite or a targeted partial update? Should you consider combining other municipal regulations into a unified development code? • What is the process and who can help? How can the public be involved? How should public officials be involved? From diagnosis to outline to draft — how long will it take? • How can you phase the project from zoning text to map? What is the code adoption process and how do staff adjust to the new code reality? The half -day workshop will include opportunities for interaction and group discussion, as well as an expert panel to address your community's specific zoning issues on the spot. Special topics to be discussed will include sign controls, site plan review process and standards, design- and form -based approaches, and other new trends in the zoning field. Audience: Elected officials, appointed planning commissioners and members of boards of adjustment, as well as planners and zoning administrators. Tuesday, April 12 - Little Falls 1:00 — 5:00 Pm (check -in 12:30 Pm) Registration Fee: $60 /person Strategies for EtAirl Your Tax B215C FACULTY: Tony Schertler, Bob Streetar and Jay Demma This half -day workshop features practitioners from the public and private sectors providing a concise presentation of economic development fundamentals and sharing proven tools and strategies. In addition, participants will: • Gain an understanding of the inter - relationship between land use planning and economic development • Learn how to use marketing research to guide local economic development programs • Become familiar with current economic development resources (including a summary handout) • Leave the session with a template for the preparation of a Five -Year Economic Development Plan and a process for preparing, adopting and implementing such a plan in their community. Audience: Elected officials, appointed planning commissioners and members of boards of adjustment, as well as planners and zoning administrators. Thursday, June 2 - Little Falls 1:00 — 5:00 PM (check -in 12:30 PM) Registration Fee: $60 /person 4 SPECIAL FOCUS PROGRAM Two half-day programs are offered back-to-back on the same day; choose one or both! Content is different in Brainerd and Shoreview locations. Note special registration options. Stormwater Mana9cment 101 of Local LezOcrs Presented in cooperation with Northland NEMO and Minnesota DNR Wednesday, March 30 - Brainerd — For Developing Communities 14 M Using Plans, Practices & Policies to Meet a Community's Clean Water Goals While Accommodating Growth FACULTY: John Billotta, Eleanor Burkett, Jackie Froemming, Laurel Mezner, Karen Terry and Julie Westerlund This workshop will focus on the connection between land use, stormwater and the impact to water resources in the community. It will feature the Northland NEMO Linking Land Use to Water Quality Presentation, the Watershed Game interactive simulation, information on the Impaired Waters program and the role of local units of government, plus "Who's Who" in stormwater Management in Minnesota. Friday, A pril I - Shorevie — For Redeveloping Highly Urban Communities Retrofitting Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) FACULTY: John Bilotta, Jim Hafner, Shane Missaghi and Jay Riggs This workshop will review the link between land use, stormwater, and the impact to water resources in the community. Presentations will focus on: (1) the opportunities for stormwater management avail- able to communities during redevelopment, (2) the use of best practices in ultra-urban or highly imper- vious communities, and (3) the need for proper maintenance of stormwater infrastructure and systems. Audience: Elected officials, appointed planning commissioners and members of boards of adjustment, as well as planners and zoning administrators. Mornings- 8:30 AM - 12:30 Pm (check-in 8:00 AM) — Special Registration Fee: $40/person M New xis in Sbo�elar)4 Pevelopment Presented in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources CORE FACULTY: Paul Radomski and Sharon Pfeifer q 7j. r 07T 17 1 Learn about new planning and zoning issues in shoreland areas as well as the options and tools local governments can use to increase efficiencies while protecting important resources. Topics include: flexibilities drafted by the DNR that can be used today, innovations implemented by local governments, how to use land cover classifications, addressing shoreline buffers, reducing staff time for addressing shoreland development conflicts, putting new tools to use — local examples. Wednesday, March 30 - Brainerd - Country Emphasis (particularly beneficial for county officials and others interested in advancing their shoreland ordinance) Additional Faculty: Chris Pence and John Sumption Friday, April I - Shoreview - Urban Emphasis (particularly beneficial for city officials who wish to use the flexibility of the draft state shoreland standards) Additional Faculty: Breanne Rothstein and Jeff Schoenbauer Audience: Elected officials, appointed planning commissioners and members of boards of adjustment, as well as planners and zoning administrators. Afternoons - 1:00 – 5:00 Pm (check-in 12:30 Pm) — Special Registration Fee: $40/person Scholarships available from Initiative Foundation and USDA for Micropollitan units of government. (See p. 12) Package Rate for morning and afternoon workshops plus lunch-, $75 5 E C A FOCUS PROGRAM Lan4 Use Ped5iomit) our hpa-,5ter-n Minn asota*- Uvfn9 Grawfoy fry are Area ofSpedal Natural Resources Presented In cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 4=0 FACULTY: Sharon Pfeifer, lean Coleman and local government officials Southeastern Minnesota is a special place, in part due to its unique geology and unglaciated past. This portion of the state contains karst bedrock and sink holes, blufflands and steep ravines, and many plant and animal species in need of conservation. This workshop addresses how consideration and incorporation of knowledge about these sensitive features in southeastern Minnesota can guide land use planning and project implementation efforts and add protection and value to communities in this part of the state. The workshop provides an array of local speakers on topics such as the region's unique natural landscapes; land use trends; land use and watershed health; urban and rural examples of how to use natural habitats to help control storm water runoff, erosion, and water pollution for a more secure future. Audience: Elected officials, appointed planning commissioners and members of boards of adjustment, as well as planners and zoning administrators. Friday, April 15 — Northfield 9:00 AM — 4:00 Pm (check-in 8:30 AM) Special Registration Fee: $75/person BUJWinq EtAuvinq, Commmutifflo Faculty: Phil Carlson, Sharon Pfeifer, Suzanne Rhees, Brian Ross, Barb Senness and John Uban Don't miss this practical workshop designed to take the mystery out of sustainability and help you take steps to translate your community's goals into action. Attendees will: Be introduced to a common sense explanation of what "sustainability" is Explore why it's important to local government — especially in today's economy Learn how today's local government decisions affect tomorrow's local government costs Discover the range of current sustainability efforts and programs in Minnesota communities and in various agencies, with real examples of what your community could do to be more sustainable Have the opportunity to participate in two facilitated small group discussions designed to focus on systems in more depth. Options include: water, energy, economic development, land, food, and health & well-being. Audience: Elected officials, appointed planning commissioners, members of boards of adjustment and other advisory commissions. Also a valuable foundation for practitioners. Thursday, May 19 — St. Paul 8:30 AM - 12:30 Pm (check-in 8:00 AM) Registration Fee: $60/person 6 0 &SP ECIAL FOCUS P Two half -day programs are offered back -to -back on the same day; choose One or both. Note special registration option. Home cup ions: A Growing Concert) FACULTY: Richard Thompson and Eric Hedtke A number of converging trends (e- commerce, baby - boomers taking up permanent residence in lake cabins, layoffs) have led to an increase in home -based businesses —and an upsurge in problems facing local governments. This workshop outlines the challenges and ways to address them through presentations, case studies and interactive examples. Participants will learn: • The legal and historical basis for home occupations • What constitutes a home occupation & what does not; relationship to commercial /industrial uses • Potential problems — traffic, noise, odors, safety, environmental issues, signs • How to create a firm and fair home occupation provision of a zoning ordinance; difficulties in administration • Relationship to nuisance law Audience: Elected officials, appointed planning commissioners and members of boards of adjustment, as well as planners and zoning administrators. Wednesday, May 25 — Arden Hills 8:30 AM — 12:30 PM (check -in 8:00 AM) Registration Fee: $60 /person Re�- ng U n atA Suburbln Agriculture: f &eos, C ommunity Gar4 , F` rmets Malkcts & More. FACULTY: Suzanne Rhees, Robert Patton and additional specialists Urban agriculture, from backyard livestock to community gardens, processing facilities and farmers' markets, is one of the most exciting and controversial new trends in community development. Local food production is connected to the broader issues of public health, land protection, local entrepreneurship and environmental justice. At the same time, planning commissioners and staff may puzzle over how to regulate poultry, beehives, compost operations, semi - permanent structures such as hoop houses, and product sales. Meanwhile, agriculture in suburban areas faces similar issues of land use compatibility and intensity (example: "agri - tainment" operations). This session will explore policies and regulatory techniques that can support local food production without compromising community livability. Audience: Elected officials, appointed planning commissioners and other city or county staff, and urban agriculture advocates. Wednesday, May 25 — Arden Hills 1:00 - 5:00 Pm (check -in 12:45 PNl) Registration Fee: $60 /person Package Rate for morning and afternoon workshops plus lunch. $125 7 ............ rA__A C L -FY John Bilotta is an Extension Educator in Water Resources with the University of Minnesota and Minnesota Sea Grant. His primary role is leading the Nonpoint Education for Municipal Officials (NEMO) Program providing local elected and appointed leaders with the knowledge and science about Minnesota's water resources that supports informed decisions. John has 12+ years experience in Extension Education at the U of M and 8 years in other public and private capacities in soil and water resource management. Carolyn Braun is Planning Director for the City of Anoka, Minnesota. She is past President of the Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association. She has written articles for the Planning Commissioners Journal and other publications, and consults with local governments on zoning issues. Phil Carlson has consulted on planning issues for 30+ years with the firm of Bonestroo. In addition to writing zoning ordinances for numerous communities, he wrote the design guidelines for Burnsville's Heart of the City development, West St. Paul's Robert Street corridor and Mankato's Urban Design Framework. Jean Coleman, attorney and planner with CR Planning, Inc., has worked with local governments for 20+ years as a policy advocate and zoning consultant — currently focusing on community -based planning and innovative implementation techniques. Areas of expertise also include using GIS -based natural resource information in comprehensive planning, diverse tools for natural resource protection, public participation /conflict resolution techniques for developing policies and ordinances. Jay Demma, Senior Planner, directs the real estate market research operations for Bonestroo. He has over 15 years experience in real estate market research, having held various staff and executive positions at leading market research firms in the Twin Cities and Philadelphia before joining Bonestroo in 2006. Jay has worked on hundreds of assignments throughout the United States, providing market expertise on virtually all land use types, especially housing, commercial /mixed -use and urban redevelopment. Eric Hedtke has represented and advised Minnesota cities, counties and townships on land use matters for 11 years. Currently an attorney with the Minnesota Association of Townships, his legal career has focused on local government as a city and town attorney and on behalf of the Minnesota Counties Insurance Trust. Joel Jamnik is a partner with the law firm of Campbell Knutson. He currently serves as City Attorney for Braham, Burnsville, Farmington, Lindstrom, Long Lake, Monticello, Mora, North St. Paul and Woodland, and as Assistant City Attorney for the firm's other city clients. Prior to joining Campbell Knutson, he was employed by the League of Minnesota Cities. He is a graduate of William Mitchell College of Law and St. Cloud State University. Robert Patton, AICP, is an urban and regional planner with 31 years experience in Minnesota and Washington State. He supervises a unit in the Minnesota Department of Agriculture that works on land use and environmental issues, including farmland preservation and urban /rural land -use conflict, and serves on the steering committee of the Minneapolis Urban Agriculture Policy Plan. He is also executive director of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board. 8 ��CULTY 'D Desyll Peterson, Minnetonka City Attorney since 1984, was designated a GTS Master Trainer in 2007 and regularly provides training to elected & appointed officials on municipal matters. She is currently a member of the League of MN Cities Insurance Trust Board of Directors. Sharon Pfeifer is Community Assistance Manager for DNR's 23-county Central Region. She holds a doctorate in ecology, a masters degree in environmental policy, and is a two- time recipient of the American Association for the Advancement of Science Diplomacy Fellowship and 2005 Bush Foundation Leadership Fellow. Sharon and her Community Assistance staff focus on assisting local governments in DNR's Central Region with the integration of natural resources information and green infrastructure into local plans, policies, and practices in order to conserve or improve the condition of natural habitats and water quality. Paul Radornski,, a research scientist with the MN DNR, has worked over 20 years on issues such as water level regulation, fish harvest quota management, sport fishing regulations and shoreline alteration/development. He was the science advisor for Minnesota's Alternative Shoreland Management Standards project. Suzanne Rhees, a planner in the Minnesota DNR Division of Parks and Trails, has 25 years of experience in community/neighborhood planning and zoning with emphasis on innovative land use regulations and code reform. She has written or revised zoning ordinances for cities, counties and regional and state agencies, including portions of the Minnesota guidebook, Model Ordinances for Sustainable Development, and the APAs Planning and Urban Design Standards. Previous positions include Senior Urban Designer with Cuningham Group Architecture Brian Ross, co-founder of CR Planning, has worked with many communities on sustainable development natural resource policies, programs and regulations, including shoreland ordinances. He was primary author of the State of Minnesota's guidebook on sustainable development practices, From Policy to Reality. Model Ordinances for Sustainable Development and a major contributor to the State's guide to comprehensive planning, Under Construction. Tony Schertler, Senior Vice President at Springsted Inc, currently serves as financial advisor for communities large and small throughout the Upper Midwest. He was previously on the staff of the City of St. Paul's Department of Planning and Economic Development. He is an attorney with an extensive background in land use and real estate development and is currently responsible for creating incentive programs in those areas. Barb Senness has been Plymouth City Planning Manager for more than 15 years. Prior to that she spent 16 years in various positions at the Metropolitan Council, including local planning assistance and comprehensive planning. She has also worked with Improve 494 (a transportation management organization), the City of Minneapolis, the University of Minensota Planning Office and as a private consultant. Barb is a past president of the Sensible Land Use Coalition. continued. . . 9 FA C U LTY John Shardlow is a principal with Bonestroo consulting planners and landscape architects. During his extensive years of professional practice, he has assisted 100+ cities and counties in preparing and implementing their comp plans, zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations. Bob Streetar is Community Development Director for the City of Oakdale, and previously held a similar position in Columbia Heights. He teaches economic development fundamentals as an adjunct professor at Minnesota State University – Mankato, and is currently working on his PhD at Hamline University, focusing on economic development. Richard Thompson's background includes a wide range of positions in the field of land use planning. He has been St. Croix County (WI) planning director, a sector representative, manager of comprehensive plan reviews at the Metropolitan Council, and with TKDA Consulting Engineers, Architects and Planners. At TKDA, he served as town and city planner for various jurisdictions, handling all local planning needs. He currently serves as a consultant at the Metropolitan Council. John Uban, Principal with Bonestroo, has 30+ years experience in planning and design projects in the Upper Midwest, and has been lead planner for numerous residential subdivisions on behalf of major developers and builders in the Twin Cities area. APPIT!""Moo For Stormwater and Shorelland Workshops Eleanor Burkett, Extension Educator, Water Resources, University of Minnesota Extension Jackie Froemming, Extension Education—Crow Wing County, Water Resources, University of Minnesota Extension Jim Hafner, Stormwater Manager, City of Blaine Laurel Mezner, Watershed Unit Supervisor, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency—Brainerd Office Shane Missaghi, Extension Educator, Water Resources, University of Minnesota Extension Chris Pence, Land Services Supervisor, Crow Wing County Jay Riggs, District Manager, Washington Conservation District Breanne Rothstein, AICP, Senior City Planner, City of Minnetrista Jeff Schoenbauer, Senior Principal and Co-Founder, Schoenbauer Consulting John Sumption, Principal, Sumption Environmental Karen Terry, Extension Educator, Water Resources, University of Minnesota Extension Julie Westerlund,, Clean Water Consultant, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources James Wisker, Planner, Program Coordinator, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 10 VORKSH 0 P SITES All workshop sites are accessible to persons with disabilities and have convenient parking for participants. Arden Hills — 651 - 792 -7800 City Hall 1245 West Highway 96 Bloomington — 952 - 563 -8700 Civic Center 1800 West told Shakopee Road Brainerd — 218- 824 -1125 (Environmental Services Dept.) Crow Wing County Land Services Building 322 Laurel Street Little Falls — 320- 632 -9255 Initiative Foundation Community Room 405 First Street SE Northfield — 507- 664 -3700 Northfield Community Resource Center 1651 Jefferson Parkway Shoreview — 651 - 490 -4700 Community Center 4580 Victoria Street North St. Cloud — 320- 253 -0606 Best Western Kelly Inn 100 4 Avenue South St. Paul — 651 -209 -6400 Minnesota Counties Intergovernmental Trust (MCIT) 100 Empire Drive For information about overnight options at all sites, contact GTS by email (cschoeneck @mngts.org) or phone (651- 222 -7409 x205) 7speakers questions were best of all the rovided some at answers ! Dick obussen Plymouth Planning Commission Member 1. 1 kEG1STP<.,AT10N On-line registration available at www.mngts.org This is the preferred method of registration. Click on the Land Use logo to access the site — then click on the registration link. If you cannot register online, fill out the form on the facing page and return it at least seven days prior to the date of the first workshop you are attending to: GTS Educational Events 2233 University Avenue W., Suite 150 St. Paul, MN 55114 (If you have selected the "bill me" or credit card payment options, you can fax your registration form to: 651-223-5307.) Fill out one form per person. Because registration is limited in most sites, we encourage early registration to guarantee your spot on your preferred date! FEES Registration fees include handout materials and refreshment breaks. Lunch is provided during full-day programs and the full day package option of two half day programs. CANCELLATION Fees will be refunded less a $20 service fee if the registration is cancelled four working days before the program. You may substitute another individual for the same workshop at any time if you find you cannot attend. Should weather necessitate program cancellation, notification will be posted on the WCCO websites: www.wcco.com and www.830wcco.com Registration Questions? Program Questions? Contact: Catherine Dubbe Contact: Carol Schoeneck cdubbe@mngts.org cschoeneck@mngts.org 651-222-7409 ext. 200 - or - 651-222-7409 ext. 205 - or - Minnesota Toll Free: 800-569-6880 Minnesota Toll Free: 800-569-6880 %jeciall Nj2te about Stj2rmwater Management and Shorelland Development Workshops (page 5) A limited number of scholarships for the March 30 Brainerd presentation of these two workshops (morning, afternoon or both) are available to representatives of the six Micropolitan local units of government (Fairview Township, Nisswa, Lakeshore, East Gull Lake, Crow Wing County & Cass County) as a result of grants from the Initiative Foundation and the USDA Rural Development Fund. Contact Nicky Larson (218.894.3233) before registering to determine availability and the application/ registration process. First Name _.1j Last Name e - Mall Address (REQUIRED) Title Daytime Phone ( ) Jurisdiction Street Address City State Zip N d 1" gl'atYl 1 f1 Check all that apply. Basics of Planning & Zoning — $125 y ❑ Wednesday, March 9 – St. Cloud z ❑ Thursday, April 7 – Bloomington 7D Beyond the Basics — $125 ❑ Tuesday, April 19 – St. Cloud Your Role as Planning Commission Member — $60 ❑ Tuesday, March 22 – St. Paul ❑ Thursday, June 30 – Little Falls Advanced Zoning for Professional Planners — $60 Z ❑ Thursday, April 7 – St. Paul 2 So You Want to Rewrite Your Zoning Ordinance — $60 Z ❑ Tuesday, April 12 – Little Falls n Strategies for Expanding Your Tax Base — $60 ❑ Thursday, .June 2 - Little Falls Q Land Use Decisions in Southeastern Minnesota — $75 7: ❑ Friday, April 15 – Northfield 7� Building Enduring Communities — $60 Z ❑ Thursday, May 19 - St. Paul Q Stormwater Management 101 for Local Leaders — $40 ❑ Wednesday, March 30 - Brainerd ❑ Friday, April 1 – Shoreview Managing New & Existing Shoreland Development — $40 ❑ Wednesday, March 30 - Brainerd ❑ Friday, April 1 - Shoreview -or- Attend both sessions above for special price, plus lunch — $75 ❑ Wednesday, March 30 – Brainerd ❑ Friday, April 1 – Shoreview Home Occupations: A Growing Concern — $60 ❑ Wednesday, May 25 – Arden Hills Regulating Urban and Suburban Agriculture — $60 ❑ Wednesday, May 25 - Arden Hills -or- Attend both sessions with lunch — $125 ❑ Wednesday, May 25 – Arden Hills Payment Options: ❑ Check #� in the amount of 5___ (payable to GTS Educational Events), ❑ Please email invoice to this address: If payment is not received by the end of the workshop series, you will be re- billed with a $20 service fee added to amount due. ❑ Credit Card - circle one: VISA MasterCard Discover AmEx Card# 3 -digit Security Code Exp. Date: E -mail address (REQUIRED FOR RECEIPT): Cardholder Name Billing Address Special Needs: Please call Carol Schoeneck 651- 222 -7409 ext. 205 with any special needs. 13 GTS Educational Events FIRST CLASS 2233 University Avenue W., Suite 154 U.S. Postage St. Paul, MN 55114 PAID www.mngts.or Permit No. 3137 St. Paul, MN Return Service Requested For updates plus information on other workshops and conferences, visit our website at www.mngts.org The Future of the Strip? Page 1 of 6 ar WHETHER IT'S U INDUSTRY SECTORS CAPITAL MARKETS ECONOMY, MARKETS, & TRENDS SUSTAINABILITY DEVELOPMENT BU; PLANNING & DESIGN ULI Home > Development Business > The Future of the Strip? The Future of the Strip? by Edward T. McMahon March 2, 2011 Print I Email I Post I Republish Share Facebook Linkedln Twitter For more than 50 years, retailers have favored the mwrr c m commercial strip: a linear pattern of retail SHOPS , businesses strung along major roadways STEREO characterized by massive parking lots, big signs, Itt�u'r 5N�tts5 boxlike buildings, and a total dependence on OVY GEt I ERIE automobiles for access and circulation. t For years, planners have tried to contain and improve the strip. Now they are getting help from consumers and the marketplace. The era of strip development is slowly coming to an end. Evolving consumer behavior, changing demographics, high- f priced gasoline, internet shopping, and the A typical commercial strip. urbanization of the suburbs are all pointing to a new paradigm for commercial development. C Commercial strips are not going to disappear overnight, but it is becoming increasingly clear that strip retail is retail F for the last century. The future belongs to town centers, main streets, and mixed -use development. Here is why: 2 We're overbuilt on the strip l F From 1960 to 2000 there was an almost tenfold increase in U.S. retail space, from four to 38 square feet per V person. For many years, retail space was growing five to six times faster than retail sales. Most of this space came ti C in the form of discount superstores on the suburban strip. ii 2 http: / /urbanland.uli.org /Articles /2011 /Mar/McMahonStrip 3/15/2011 The Future of the Strip? Page 2 of 6 The recession proved that we have too much retail. Strip centers are now littered with vacant stores. By some estimates, there is currently more than 1 billion square feet of vacant retail space, much of which has to be 1 repurposed or demolished. One retail analyst estimates that we need to demolish 300 million square feet of retail L space. h ii Retail is rediscovering the city S In 2010, Target announced plans to remodel the century-old Carson Pirie Scott department store in Chicago. This landmark building, designed by architect Louis Sullivan, will be just one of many new, so- called big -box retailers planned for urban neighborhoods. Similarly, in late 2010 Wal -Mart announced plans for its first- "" g ever stores in Washington, D.C. To make the four new stores fit into an urban environment, the company has agreed to Urban Wal -Mart proposed for consider an array of new layouts, designs, and parking Washington, D.C. arrangements. The store planned for New Jersey Avenue illustrates Wal- Mart's new approach. The company plans a store of 75,000 to 80,000 square feet (much smaller than usual) on the ground floor of a five -story mixed -use building featuring 315 apartments, underground parking, and space for small retail stores. Home Depot already has a new urban store in Toronto with housing on top. At the same time that Wal -Mart, Target, Home Depot, and others are planning new urban stores all over America, as many as 400 former big -box stores sit vacant on commercial strips. Most analysts agree that urban neighborhoods are the new frontier for retail —the one place left with more spending power than stores to spend it in. The suburbs are being urbanized At the same time that retail is rediscovering the city, the suburbs are being redesigned. Chris Leinberger recently declared that "the largest redevelopment trend of the next generation will be the conversion of dead or dying strip commercial centers in the suburbs into walkable urban places." ( "Walkable Urbanism," Urban Land, September 1, 2010). The conversion of car - dependent suburban development is already underway in many metropolitan areas like Washington and Los Angeles, and can be expected to increase in the years to come. Perhaps the nation's most dramatic transformation has already occurred in Arlington County, Virginia, where Wilson Boulevard, once a miles -long, low- density strip lined with used -car lots and fast -food joints, has been transformed into a walkable urban place. According to Leinberger, "Arlington County now gets 60 percent of its tax revenue from 10 percent of its land mass." Traffic congestion, fuel prices, and auto - oriented design are problems for the strip Americans value convenience, but the perceived convenience of the strip has been reduced as traffic congestion has worsened in recent years. Add to this rising fuel prices and an overall physical environment designed for cars, instead of people, and it's understandable why fewer people want to shop the strip and almost no one wants to linger. Suburban town centers and main streets provide a "place- making dividend" that the homogeneous blur of the strip can't match. They also provide a "park once" environment that will grow in importance if fuel prices rise. Just imagine what will happen to strip development if gas prices hit $5 a gallon or more, as some analysts predict. Young consumers favor walkability and places with character Walking for pleasure is, by far, America's number -one form of outdoor recreation. If you combine walking with shopping— another one of America's favorite pastimes —you have a winning combination. Time - constrained http: / /urbanland.uli.org /Articles /2011 /Mar/McMahonStrip 3/15/2011 The Future of the Strip? Page 3 of 6 lifestyles and boredom with the dull sameness of most strip centers have meant a slow but steady decline in the number and length of stays at strip malls. People go to get what they want and they leave. A pleasant (i.e., "cool ") atmosphere is "- particularly important to the GenY generation. A mixed -use town center with street life, outdoor dining, and places to hang out, walk, and window -shop are much more likely to get 3 ,. the affection and the dollars of young shoppers than an auto- ., dependent strip. y The economy is restructuring the retail landscape The recession saw the collapse of numerous big -box chains, The old paradigm: single use, like Circuit City and Linens 'n Things. This helped send auto- oriented. vacancy rates soaring. After three years on the brink, consumer confidence has improved, but many analysts say we can expect a new "normal" when it comes to retail spending. Why? Because unemployment remains high, the days of unlimited credit are over, and retail analysts predict that a "new consumer frugality" will be the norm for years to come. What's more, strip centers without anchors (like grocery stores) and Class B malls are virtually unfinanceable, according to many experts. We're also moving into an era of hybrid shopping centers. We used to have three standardized formats: the strip, the enclosed mall, and the power center. Now, all of these things are coming together in one place, in a hybrid format. According to commercial analysts, this means we are going to see a far greater mix of tenants than in the past. No longer will there be a Wal -Mart on one side of the street and a mall on the other. In the future, the Wal- Mart and the Costco will be in the same mall as Nordstrom and Macy's. Also, many malls will more closely resemble old- fashioned main streets. Already, seven of the 13 regional malls in the Denver metropolitan area —like Belmar in Lakewood, Colorado —have been turned into mixed -use town centers. E- Commerce means fewer and smaller stores Today, the nation's "healthiest" retailer is not Wal -Mart or Costco. It is Amazon. Amazon has exploited the increasing availability of broadband internet and mobile technology to build a retail superpower. One of the biggest reasons why the strip is coming to an end is because bricks - and - mortar; stores are becoming a smaller part of the retail landscape. First, it was catalog shopping; now it is e- commerce, social media, and mobile phones. This means that retailers will seek smaller footprints as merchandise categories move to online channels. For example, the rise of Netflix and streaming video means the end of bricks -and motor video The new paradigm: mixed use, accessible stores. E- readers portend the end or at least the downsizing by both cars and pedestrians. of bookstores; ditto for music stores, greeting card stores, and other merchandise categories. r drugstores, None of this is meant to suggest that we won't still have neighborhood centers with grocery stores and coffee shops, among other things. We will. But the endless expansion of the commercial strip —that homogeneous cluster of, sign clutter and asphalt that leads out from every town —is reaching the end of its useful life. A new paradigm is being shaped —not just by regulation, but also by consumers and the marketplace. Commercial strips (i.e., "road towns ") with no beginning and no end, with no center and no way to get around except by car, are http: / /urbanland.ull.org /Articles /2011/Mar/McMahonStrip 3/15/2011 The Future of the Strip? Page 4 of 6 becoming obsolete in an era of shrinking stores, rising gas prices, discerning consumers, walkable suburbs, and online shopping. To read a related article, see Repositioning Urban Corridors by Karen Gulley. Print I Email I Post I Republish Comments(4) 1 Share Comments (4) Want to join the conversation? Log in or join ULI now. Mr. Jeffrey K. Ericson - Phoenix, AZ wrote - on March 10, 2011 at 5:59 PM Good Article - I'd like to add one more variable - cost of land. Cheap land invites cheap buildings and lots of parking. This is the formula that drives the suburbs and rural development even today. Higher cost land and higher barriers to entry justify more investment in design and execution. I believe that the current iteration of 'lifestyle' centers is just a blip on the radar as retailers grapple with new realities and try to 'monetize' the quality of our diminishing free time. Amazon does this well by handling all of the logistics, including delivery to your house. Costco does this by the suggestion that you can consolidate the burden of shopping into one ugly weekly or monthly trip. Starbucks patrons 'reward' themselves with an overpriced coffee or latte. Driving is no longer fun, and no longer equates to freedom. We can't talk on our cell phones, we can't have a beer, we're stuck in traffic. The appeal of walkable areas is undeniable, but our lifestyles are still tethered to the car, which means multi -level parking structures attached to the lifestyle center, and the always ugly experience of navigating that. Kate Milgrim - Philadelphia, PA wrote - on March 10, 2011 at 4:26 PM Density and good design are twin elements of the urban retail described here, and I agree that shopping in an urban environment and even some'lifestyle centers' is preferable to big box alternatives. However, I see two major hurdles that need to be addressed before we start seeing significant numbers of big box retailers move into the city and go vertical. First, from a shopper's perspective, how do I get my purchases home or to my car? 70 years ago, people made daily trips to the store for consumables and needed to carry only a bag or two home. Second, finding buildings or infill sites (and their adjacent streets) that would accommodate tractor - trailers and loading docks is a significant challenge. I believe that two paradigms must change before we start seeing a real shift away from strip and power centers. Shoppers will need to change the way they shop, and real estate professionals (investors and developers) will need to be convinced that retail in urban or mixed -use centers is more profitable than big boxes. This is a chicken and an egg situation. Hopefully, as people continue to move into cities they will support their neighborhood stores to keep demand localized. Mr. John W. Shardlow FAICP - Saint Paul, MN wrote - on March 10, 2011 at 11:56 AM This is a timely article on a very important topic and a set of land use issues that we are trying to deal with for many public and private sector clients. The new examples that are cited are very helpful, but they show what can be done to redevelop strips in areas with high population density and excellent transit service, in walkable neighborhoods. In contrast, one of my suburban city clients has over 30 aging strip centers that were all built in the 1980s and many of them are on smaller sites, sandwiched between very busy roadways and fully developed, low to medium density residential neighborhoods. The adjacent residential areas are automobile oriented, suburban styled subdivisions, which for the most part are not yet ready to be redeveloped. This suburban strip center reuse dilemma is a much tougher nut to crack. Some can be repositioned with a face lift http: / /urbanland.uli.org /Articles /2011/Mar/McMahonStrip 3/15/2011 The Future of the Strip? Page 5 of 6 and new tenants. Some are not so dominated by highway noise and related impact and they can be converted to mixed use, or even straight residential in a different pattern. Unfortunately, the majority of the sites are small with shape and access constraints and are overwhelmed by highway noise. These are much harder to figure out. Mr. Trent A. Noll - Santa Ana, CA wrote - on March 7, 2011 at 6:01 PM Modern Place making has evolved full circle pointing us back to what worked in the past and blending it with its context in today's retail development landscape. Despite the financial pressures and perils of modern place making, domestically and globally we see cities and developers turning to architects, landscape architects, and urban planners to craft places that attract tenants and customers from early morn through late evening extending the urban life cycle of a place. In many ways, the art of making a place where people want to gather and live today involves a restoration of nostalgic sensibilities that some Americans have lost, still holding strong in small -town America —a central Main Street or square, fronted by town walks, civic buildings , specialty retailers, family eateries with down town live work housing, neighborhood theater, central park with town square, and massive street trees. In brief, the historic norm evolved functionally with gathering places to shop, mingle, live, work, eat, and rest in the park, stroll, and take in a movie, people - watch, meet friends. Even before the emergence of "mixed -use" as a popular urban planning buzzword, Americans were naturally enjoying the benefits. Domestic population growth, suburbanization, and the ubiquitous automobile in the Post -War era in many cities changed the traditional Main Street ideal. And for several decades, what replaced Main Street was not focused on a quality of experience but a drive toward the fastest most convenient, best value for the consumer. There is no gainsaying the convenience of the automobile, but car - friendly and people - friendly districts became inundated in many Post -War business districts or shopping- centers. Too often what emerged in suburban America were strip- and big -box malls that were accessed by primarily by cars conveniently parked in front of oversized buildings on large, treeless asphalt parking lots. In some cases, new urban America gave way to single -use office campuses; the kind that emptied after the work was done. Office plazas often became barren without healthy street -life, and often safety forbidding to pedestrians. Most people arrived by car and punched out the same way. Now day's developers and city planners ultimately realized that inhospitality proved to be a bad business model. Public and private planners and developers are moving to partner together and refit failed projects of the past bringing new life to broken properties From misguided beginnings in the 1950s and 1960s, designers began to resurrect elements that had proved so successful in traditional placemaking— the importance of landscape amenities in the resurrected town square, the street promenade, and the central park gardens can change a place from vacant to inviting. In recent developments the regional destination projects including Casinos and major - league athletic stadiums have now evolved into mixed -used Mecca's with resplendent landscapes, along with multiple dining and retail opportunities. And, of course, modern shopping developments are often full - fledged recreations of friendly, mixed -use urban zones. It was not only nostalgia or "modern urbanism" that led to the placemaking renaissance, but a need to salvage revenues from failed commercial development models. If A casino, mixed -use office park, shopping mall downtown district, or resort that isn't thriving 18 hours a day its bad planning, and poor use of the developer's dollar and a city's taxable assets. It may be expensive to provide landscape amenities; but for cities and developers it has become more expensive not to. Design -Build Place making Plainly, the modern art of successful mixed -use placemaking —on time and on budget —is much more design- intense than the process of single -use office districts or tract housing developments. For city planners and developers is the challenge to create urban places with, memorable characteristics that will entice retailers to invest in them. Too much uniformity in the fashion mix, little diversity in food and beverage choices, or not enough landscape amenities such as common area resting areas and interesting interactive landscape elements can spell defeat. For private developers the goal is both to make a long lasting place that is flexible enough to grow and change over time while making money doing it. For city planners and private developers, a worthy option is to turn to a design -build team from the start. Design -build helps control costs in such immensely detailed undertakings, in part because constructability is vetted from the get -go, and the relationships between designers, contractors, through the design and construction processes are integral and unified. In either public- or private- sector placemaking, landscape has become expected to reach success, due to the enduring human yearning and love for nature, and the developer's need to create projects that attract customers and tenants through the entire extended business clock. In the design -build process, prime landscape opportunities are brought to the fore early on, before schedule constraints dictate either additional expenses or hard choices that could undercut the aesthetics and sense of place. Without expertly designed and built hardscapes and landscapes, the winning sense of place becomes almost unachievable. Most important, a unified design -build team can help ensure that overall project aesthetics and costs are consistent from the big idea to the smallest design detail where individual cost is married to project success. The end result is a richer physical environ, and better return for all involved. Trent Noll, ASIA, is senior principal and director of design for ValleyCrest Design Group, a global collective of award - winning landscape architects and designers specializing in world - class, sustainable, and forward- thinking landscape http://urbanland.uli.org/Articles/201 I /Mar/McMahonStrip 3/15/2011 The Future of the Strip? Page 6 of 6 design. The m - g e co pany is lauded for its integrated design build approach, completing projects from offices in Los Angeles and Orange County, Calif.; Orlando, Denver and Shanghai, China. i Duane orriorris: WHETHER T'S WERE THE REAL ESTATE tAW PRACTIC Copyright © 2010 -2011 Urban Land Institute ULI . All rights reserved. Use of this Web site constitutes a ( ) 9 Urban Land Magazine Industry Sectors I Capital Markets I Economy, Markets, & Trends I Sustainability I Development Business About UrbanLand I Archives ( Advertise I Join ULI I RSS I Contact Us I Terms of Use I http: / /urbanland.ull.org /Articles /2011 /Mar/McMahonStrip 3/15/2011 1. Redevelopment of 8+ acres � _ �� = s� � � i g a� a 5 s _ 1 $ s R t ' p tualPlanni � � �� l� t� S� �_ �� �� �� �k =� } g� � �k � t£ .� � :_ � I= �_ = 8.Conce Former Racquet Club Site A I B c o EDA's 8.6 Acres, E F G � and excess MNDot R.O.W. Centro's 23.2 Acres Twin Lake Trail Goldmark's 8 Acres opportunities w PALMER LAKE PARK Opportunity Site Update 2. Real Estate Recycling M,_,._ �O ... 9. Marketing of Phase II 60,000 sq.ft multi- tenant �. EDA Site - Link to EBHC, W office /warehouse building ....,. Pond, Fountain 3. 57th Avenue and Logan -TM• 10. FBI Development and EDA marketing of - Northern .6 acres °��• Completion of o ,' . remaining 5 acres MPCA vapor remediation -- f;, - Southern 8 acres 3 UN.R,L w�• Marketing for EDA redevelopement 11.Humboldt Ave Corridor Enhancement opportunities T.. .. "u 4. Twin Lakes Trail LOCALSTREE 4 M extension to Mississippi INDEX — °" 12.Phase III Luther Regional Park 1 ...• Auto, Honda, Toyota 5. Brookdale Redevelopment Shingle Creek Crossing - 5 BROOKDALE MALL 4• — -� \ M .. 13.Boulevard Market Town Center r !, 6,700 sq ft rE..� 7 ..... Commercial Building 6. EDA's redevelopment - - of 1.06 Acres - s 14.Northwest Family Service Former Boulevard - -- COIYlI1lUrilty Development Center - 63,000 sq ft Office, Bar and Grill site Projects Ramp, and Intersection Improvements i 7. Shingle Creek "' °` BROOKLYN Enhancements 7 - CENTER 15.Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Trail and Daylighting — Study / Reimaging