Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011 04-19 HCP AGENDA BROOKLYN CENTER HOUSING COMMISSION April 19, 2011 7:00 p.m. Council Commission Room Brooklyn Center City Hall 1. Call to Order: 7:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda 4. Approval of Minutes — February 22, 2011 and March 15, 2011 5. Chairperson's Report 6. Council Liaison Report 7. New Neighbor Welcome Program Update 8. Continue Discussion on Community Gardens (see attached background information) 9. Future Meeting Items 10. Other Business 11. Adjournment: 8:30 Work Session Agenda Item No. 1 AUGUST 24 2009 COUNCIL WORK SESSION - MINUTES AND STAFF REPORTS RE: COMMUNITY GARDENS i I MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WORK SESSION AUGUST 24, 2009 CITY HALL.— COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER I The Brooklyn Center City Council/Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to order by Mayor/President Tim Willson at 8:25 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor /President Tim Willson and Councilmembers /Commissioners Kay Lasman, Tim Roche, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, and Carol Hamer, Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. MISCELLENEOUS Discussion continued on rental license ordinance enforcement. Councilmember Yelich further stated his position that the City Council and staff are obligated to enforce the rental license ordinance, and that enforcement should be applied uniformly and consistently. He also stated his position that if the City has a process in place it would be reasonable to send out a letter notifying property owners that they are delinquent on utilities, and that their license is subject to revocation based on the rental license ordinance. He further stated his position that the rental license fee can be adjusted to cover the costs associated with administering the program, and that the City needs to operate its licensing program under the conditions and standards in Brooklyn Center, rather than in comparison with other communities. There was discussion on the above statements made by Councilmember Yelich. It was noted that upcoming work session discussions include Rental Ordinance Amendments and Zoning/Code Enforcement Ordinance Amendments. The majority consensus of the City Council was that staff should continue to enforce delinquent utility payments according to the current procedure. j Councilmember Yelich distributed 2008 Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) Crime Statistics and noted that Mr. Boganey recently provided the Council with information about crime statistics /reporting and variables affecting crime. He stated his position that it should be recognized that crime reporting is a highly variable process and that the statistics provided by the BCA are the best information available to the City at this time. It was noted that the City is addressing the issue of crime with the hiring of two new officers. 08/24/09 -1- i Councilmember Yelich requested an update from staff on a timeline to address Council's direction to prepare sign ordinance implementation guidelines. City Manager Curt Boganey indicated his intent is to include this topic on the next City Council meeting agenda. COMMUNITY GARDENS — COUNCILMEMBER LASMAN Councilmember Lasman stated she has been approached by residents showing an interest in creating a community garden program in the City. She had provided Mr. Boganey with information provided by the Metropolitan Council on community gardens and information she obtained from the Public Works Director in the City of Hopkins. Mr. Boganey assigned additional information gathering on community gardens to Mr. Eitel. Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel provided a presentation on community gardens. The presentation included photos and information on Valley Park in the City of Hopkins and Eidum Historic Farmstead in the City of Brooklyn Park. Mr. Eitel presented an outline on starting a community garden provided by the American Community Garden Association. He presented photos on potential garden plot sites: Xcel Energy Transmission Line Corridor; Northbrook Church Site; Odyssey Charter School Site; Willow Lane School and Park; and 70 Avenue — Adjacent to Willow Lane Apartments. Mr. Eitel requested discussion and direction on the position of the City Council regarding the City's role in promoting, facilitating, or developing community gardens. He indicated it should be noted that there are potential savings associated with a community garden. The City spends approximately $350 for each mowing at 57` and Logan Avenues; this property is normally mowed five to six times per season. There was discussion on the following topics in relation to creating a community garden program: • Examples of community gardens in other municipalities • Costs associated with the program would be covered by the rental fee for garden lots • American Community Garden Association Fact Sheet • Importance of including clear expectations in lot agreements • Possible issues associated with water accessibility for locations that are not adjacent to the river or creek Each member of the City Council stated support for consideration of creating a community garden program. The majority consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to conduct further exploration, refine the possibilities, and define the structure of a community garden program. Mr. Boganey indicated staff will present Council with analysis and options for consideration. ADJOURNMENT 08/24/09 -2- Councilmember /Commissioner Lasman moved and Councilmember /Commissioner Ryan seconded adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 9:10 P.M. Motion passed unanimously. 08/24/09 -3- STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss. Certification of Minutes CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER) The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, certifies: 1. That attached hereto is a full, true, and complete transcript of the minutes of a Work Session of the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center held on August 24, 2009. 2. That said meeting was held pursuant to due call and notice thereof and was duly held at Brooklyn Center City Hall. 3. That the City Council adopted said minutes at its September 14, 2009, Regular Session. City Clerk Mayor 08/24/09 -4- MEMORANDUM - CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE: August 18, 2009 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development�- SUBJECT: Discussion on Community Gardens COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: City Council discussion and.direction regarding the City's role in either promoting, facilitating, or developing community gardens. BACKGROUND: At the April 27th informal open forum, the City Council received a request by a resident for the City to consider assisting in the creation of a community garden program. As a follow up to this request, staff has been obtaining information on community gardening in • preparation for a future report to the City Council. Subsequently, Council Member Lasman requested that a discussion on community gardens, including a review of the City of Hopkins's garden program, be placed on a future work session agenda. On August 14th, l visited the City of Hopkins community garden that is located in a passive part of a large neighborhood park, Valley Park, that parallels Nine Mile Creek. This community garden provides 185 garden plots (20'x20') that the City offers to residents for an annual plot fee of $12.00 per year. The role of the City of Hopkins includes tilling of the land in the Spring, providing sanitary facility (satellite) at the site, waste containers, and coordinates the registration, plot staking, communications to gardners and year end clean up. The gardeners are responsible for either drawing or pumping water from the creek. The Hopkins's Asst. City Manager indicated that the City has managed this community garden for approximately 30 years, individuals are limited to a maximum of 5 garden plots, that residents receive the first option, that they have not experienced disputes amongst the gardners, and that all of the plot were rented in 2009. Photos of this community garden will be presented at the meeting. Additionally, this year the City of Brooklyn Park created a community garden as part of the Eidem Historic Homestead site, a 10 acre farmstead maintained to provide a living record of farm life in Minnesota during the years of 1890 to 1910. The City tilled two areas that i provide a total of 80 garden plots (20'x20') and extended water service to serve the • gardens. The city fee is $50 per plot with a limit of 1 plot per household, unless additional lots are available after the new rental period. The Director of Recreation and Parks indicated that all plots were rented this year and that the City has not experienced any problems, other than the need to erect deer fences to protect the garden plots. He also noted that the gardners have requested to do their own tilling next year A search on the internet included numerous sites in both the U.S. and Canada on community gardening including The American Community Gardening Association which is celebrating their 25Th Anniversary and uses the theme, "Building Communities Through Greening". This web site provided a fact sheet on basic information needed for a gardening project which has been attached for reference. i Potential Garden Plot Sites: A review of the City aerial photos indicates that there are several areas that are privately owned that are under developed and could be possible candidates for this type of an activity, such as the transmission line which runs parallel to 57th Ave. Also churches and schools often have open space areas that are not actively used or reserved for a future use. • The City /EDA has commercial sites that have been acquired to promote redevelopment that may be appropriate for an interim use of gardening and an opportunity to defer the annual maintenance costs associated with mowing and site cleanup. Additionally, there may be an opportunity to provide scattered sites throughout the community though the use of the City's Remove & Rebuild Program for blighted foreclosed homes. Polia Question: Should staff further pursue the development of a community garden program? I i i i I I i I • American Starting a Community Garden Community This fact sheet is designed to give many different groups the basic information they need to get their gardening project off the ground. These fists are in no way meant to be complete. Each main Gardening idea will probably trigger more questions, so an assortment of ways to carry out that idea are presented; pick and choose those that seem to apply to your own situation. Association FORM A PLANNING COMMITTEE • Determine if there really is a need and desire for a garden. ® • What kind of garden — vegetable, flower, trees, a combination? ir • Who will the garden serve — youth, seniors, special populations, people who just want an alternative to trash? • If the project is meant to benefit a particular group or neighborhood, it is essential that the group be involved in all phases. • Organize a meeting or social gathering of interested people. • Choose a well- organized leadership team. • Make a list of what needs to be done. • Decide on a mailing address and central telephone number(s). Try to have at least 3 people Building who are very familiar with all pertinent information. Form a telephone tree. • Find a garden site. Communities • Obtain lease or agreement from owner. • Determine a source of water. Through • Form committees to accomplish tasks: Funding & Resource Development; Youth Activities; Construction; Communication. Greening • Approach a sponsor. A sponsor is an individual or organization that supports a community garden. Site sponsorship can be a tremendous asset. Contributions of land, tools, seeds, fencing, soil improvements or money are all vital to a successful community garden. Some community gardens can provide most of their provisions through fees'charged to the • membership; but for many, a garden sponsor is essential. Churches, schools, citizens groups, private businesses, local parks and recreation departments are all potential supporters. Community Development Block Grants are sometimes available through your municipality. • If your community garden has a budget, keep administration in the hands of several people. • Choose a name for the garden. CHOOSE A SITE • Identify the owner of the land. • Make sure the site gets at least 6 full hours of sunlight daily (for vegetables). • Do a soil test in the fall for nutrients & heavy metals. • Consider availability of water. • Try and get a lease or agreement which allows the space to be used at least for 3 years. • Consider past uses of the land. Is there any contamination? • Is insurance something you need to consider? PREPARE AND DEVELOP THE SITE • Clean the site. • Develop your design. • Gather your resources —try to gather free materials. • Organize volunteer work crews. • Plan your work day. • Decide on plot sizes, mark plots dearly with gardeners names. • Include plans for a storage area for tools and other equipment, as well as a compost and event areas. • Have a rainproof bulletin board for announcing garden events and messages. • Arrange for land preparation — plowing, etc—or let gardeners do their own prep. • Will the garden be organic? • • Lay out garden to place flower or shrub beds around the visible perimeter. This helps to promote good will with non - gardening neighbors, passersby, and municipal authorities. I • ORGANIZE THE GARDEN • Are there conditions for membership (residence, dues, agreement with rules)? • How will plots be assigned (by family size, by residency, by need, by group— i.e., youth, elderly, etc.)? • How large should plots be (or should there be several sizes based on family size or other factors? • How should plots be laid out? • If the group charges dues, how will the money be used? What services, if any, will be provided to gardeners in return? i • Will the group do certain things cooperatively (such as turning in soil in the spring, planting cover crops, or composting)? • When someone leaves a plot, how will the next gardener be chosen? • How will the group deal with possible vandalism? • Will there be a children's plot? • Will the gardeners meet regularly? If so, how often and for what purposes? • Will gardeners share tools, hoses, and other such items? • How will minimum maintenance (especially weeding) be handled both inside plots and in common areas (such as along fences, in flower beds, and in sitting areas)? • Will there be a set of written rules which gardeners are expected to uphold? If so, how will they be enforced? • Should your group incorporate and consider eventually owning your garden site? INSURANCE It is becoming increasingly difficult to obtain leases from landowners without obtaining liability insurance. Garden insurance is a new thing for many insurance carriers and their underwriters are reluctant to cover community gardens. It helps if you know what you want before you start talking to agents. Two tips: you should probably be working with an agent from a firm which deals with many different carriers (so you can get the best policy for your needs) and you will probably have better success with one of the ten largest insurance carriers, rather than smaller ones. SETTING UP A NEW GARDENING ORGANIZATION • Many garden groups are organized very informally and operate successfully. Leaders "rise to the occasion" to propose ideas and carry out tasks. However, as the work load expands, many groups choose a more formal structure for their organization. A structured program is a means to an end. It is a conscious, planned effort to create a system so that each person can participate fully and the group can perform effectively. It's vital that the leadership be responsive to the members. Structure will help an organization to last; it will promote trust; it will help your group grow and create new opportunities for leaders to develop. If your group is new, have several planning meetings to discuss your program and organization. Try out suggestions raised at these meetings and after a few months of operation, you'll be in a better position to develop bylaws or organizational guidelines. A community garden project should be kept simple as possible, whether large or small. Bylaws are rules which govern the internal affairs of an organization. They are required when you form a nonprofit corporation, but are useful even if your group is a club or a group of neighbors. Many battles are won simply because one side has more pieces of paper to wave than the other. It's helpful to look over bylaws from other similar organizations if you are incorporating. Guidelines and Rules (see TROUBLESHOOTING for examples) are less formal than Bylaws, and are often adequate enough for a garden group that has no intention of incorporating. Organizational Considerations: • What is your purpose? What are your short and long -term objectives? • How are decisions to be made? Who chooses leaders and how? • How will work be shared? Who does what? • How will you raise money? Membership dues, fund raising, grants, sponsors? • Are you open to change? Flexibility is important when goals and members change. Do you want to be incorporated or act as a club? I What goes into formal Bylaws: • Full official name of organization and legal address. • The purpose, goals and philosophy of the organization. • Membership categories and eligibility requirements. • Membership dues, how much and when paid. • Specify when and how often regular or special meetings of the membership are to be held, as well as regular and annual meetings of the board of directors. • State what officers are necessary, how they are chosen, length of term, their duties and how vacancies are filled. • State special committees, their purpose and how they operate. • Establish 'a system so that bylaws can be rescinded or amended, maybe by a simple majority. State any official policies or practices: e.g.. garden group will avoid the use of hazardous substances; group will agree to keep all adjacent sidewalks in good repair and free of ice and snow in season; group will make all repairs necessary to keep equipment, fences and furniture in good order and repair. • Include a Hold Harmless clause (sample): 'We the undersigned members of the (name) garden group hereby agree to hold harmless (name owner) from and against any damage, loss, liability, claim, demand, suit, cost and expense directly or indirectly resulting from, arising out of or in connection with the use of the (name) garden by the garden group, its successors, assigns, employees, agents and invites." For more information on whether to incorporate as a non -profit corporation (a state function) or to apply for tax deductible charitable (501(c)3) status (a federal IRS function), go to the following websites: www.fdnoenter.ora/learn/faas/startina nonoroft.html www.nolo.com /index.cfm (in the Business & Human Resources section, select nonprofit organizations) www.tgci.com/mggazine/96summer/tobel.asp HOW TO MANAGE YOUR COMMUNITY GARDEN In order to offer a high quality community garden program, good management techniques are essential. Included in this fact sheet are the main ideas to consider in management, along with many different ways to carry them out. • Having written rules is very important with older groups as well as new gardens, since they spell out exactly what is expected of a gardener. They also make it much easier to eliminate dead wood should the need arise. Sample Guidelines and Rules Some may be more relevant to vegetable gardens than to community flower gardens or parks. Pick and choose what best fits your situation. • I will pay a fee of $_ to help cover garden expenses. • I will have something planted In the garden by (date) and keep it planted all summer long. • If I must abandon my plot for any reason, I will notify the garden leaders. • I will keep weeds down and maintain the areas immediately surrounding my plot if any. • If my plot becomes unkempt, I understand I will be given 1 week's notice to clean it up. At that time, it will be re- assigned or tilled in. • 1 will keep trash and litter cleaned from the plot, as well as from adjacent pathways and fences. • I will participate in the fall cleanup of the garden. • I will plant tall crops only where they will not shade neighboring plots. • I will pick only my own crops unless given permission by another plot user. • I will not use fertilizers, insecticides or weed repellents that will in any way affect other plots. • I agree to volunteer hours toward community gardening efforts (include a list of volunteer tasks which your garden needs). • I will not bring pets to the garden. • I understand that neither the garden group nor owners of the land are responsible for my actions. I THEREFORE AGREE TO HOLD HARMLESS THE GARDEN GROUP AND OWNERS OF THE LAND FOR ANY LIABILITY, DAMAGE, LOSS OR CLAIM THAT OCCURS IN CONNECTION WITH USE OF THE GARDEN BY ME OR ANY OF MY GUESTS. Application Forms • Application forms can include any of the following information: Name(s) Address Telephone number. Days Evenings Site Preference: 1.2. 3.4. Size of plot (list choices available) Season: Year round (must be maintained all year) Short season (include dates) Check the appropriate items: • 1 am a senior citizen • 1 am physically disabled • This is my first year at this garden i • I would Ike a garden next to a friend, Name I have gardened here before and would like plot #_ if available • 1 have gardened before at (where?); for how long? i TROUBLESHOOTING Vandalism is a common fear among community gardeners. However, the fear tends to be much greater than the actual incidence. Try these proven methods to deter vandalism: • Make a sign for the garden. Let people know to whom the garden belongs and that it is a neighborhood project. • Fences can be of almost any material. They serve as much to mark possession of a property as to prevent entry, since nothing short of razor -wire and land mines will keep a determined vandal from getting in. Short picket fences or turkey wire will keep out dogs and honest people. • Create a shady meeting area in the garden and spend time there. • Invite everyone in the neighborhood to participate from the very beginning. Persons excluded from the garden are potential vandals. • Involve the neighborhood children in teaming gardens. They can be the garden's best protectors. Plant raspberries, roses or other thorny plants along the fence as a barrier to fence climbers. • • Make friends with neighbors whose window overlook the garden. Trade them flowers and vegetables for a protective eye. • Harvest all ripe fruit and vegetables on a daily basis. Red tomatoes failing from the vines invite trouble. • Plant potatoes, other root crops or a less popular vegetable such as kohlrabi along the side walk or fence. Plant the purple varieties of cauliflower and beans or the white eggplant to confuse a vandal. • Plant a "vandal's garden" at the entrance. Mark it with a sign: "If you must take food, please take it from i here. j Children's Plots " Children included in the garden process become champions of the cause rather than vandals of the garden. Therefore your garden may want to allocate some plots specifically for children. The "children's garden" can help market your idea to local scout troops, day cares, foster grandparent programs, church groups, etc. Consider offering free small plots in the children's garden to children whose parents already have a plot in the garden. People Problems and Solutions Angry neighbors and bad gardeners pose problems for a community garden. Usually the two are related. Neighbors complain to municipal governments about messy, unkempt gardens or rowdy behavior, most gardens can ill afford poor relations with neighbors, local politicians or potential sponsors. Therefore, choose bylaws carefully so you have procedures to follow when members fail to keep their plots clean and up to code. A well - organized garden with strong leadership and committed members can overcome almost any obstacle. I 'I • RESOURCES Horticultural Information: • Cooperative Extension Service in your county • Garden Clubs • Horticultural Societies • Garden Centers Seeds: • America the Beautiful Fund 219 72515th Street, NW, Suite 605, Dept. AG, Washington, DC 20005 (202)638 -1649 hftp:/twww.freeseeds.us/OperationGPfbnn.htmi • Garden Centers and Hardware Stores Bedding plants: • Local nurseries • Vocational -Tech Horticulture Department • High school Horticulture classes • Parks Department Websites: http7f/celosangeles.ucdavis.edu/Ciarden/articles/startup ouide html http://celosanQeles.ucdavis.edu/ciarden/arficles/school startup auide.html http://eica.or-q/dcs/starfin-g.html htto: / /nnninfo. orafindex.Dho ?a =ouide httn: /twww. urbanharvest .ora /communitvlhovAostart.htm] htto: //www.foodshare.net/toolbox month07.htm htto: / /aesop rutaers edu/— niuep /ndf /oommoard odf • I I f i Work Session Agenda Item. No. 5 JANUARY 25 2010 COUNCIL WORK SESSION - MINUTES AND STAFF REPORTS RE: COMMUNITY GARDENS i MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WORK SESSION JANUARY 25, 2010 CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council /Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to order by Mayor /President Tim Willson at 8:57 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor /President Tim Willson and Councilmembers /Commissioners Kay Lasman, Tim Roche, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Assistant City Manager /Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, City Attorney Corrine Heine, and Carol Hamer, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. GATEWAY COMMONS - REVOKED RENTAL LICENSE Discussion continued on the Gateway Commons revoked rental license and improvements made to the property. Mr. - Brummer answered questions of the City Council on the property improvements and security measures taken at the property. Improvements on the first 12 buildings are underway. An approximate completion date of all 21 buildings is anticipated to be Spring of 2011. Mr. Brummer stated that the on -site security will remain as long as the need continues. Section 42 and Section 8 housing vouchers will not be accepted. Councilmembers Lasman, Roche, and Yelich indicated that they have visited the property and stated their support of the improvements to the property. Councilmember Yelich indicated there are a few safety concerns relating to the building code that he will be addressing to the Building Inspector. City Manager Curt Boganey stated Mr. Brummer attempted to submit a rental application and was advised by staff that an application would not be appropriate at this stage in the process as it cannot be considered prior to April 10, 2010. Mr. Boganey explained that the application process would allow a license for the entire property once the minimum standards have been met. What Mr. Brummer would like to do is substantially improve the units beyond the minimum standards of the City ordinance. Also, his desire is not to rent out units that have not been substantially renovated. He advised that these two approaches are to some degree in conflict with each other. Mr. Boganey stated the City Attorney has advised that if the City Council supports lifting the revocation and considering Mr. Brummer's request, they may want to issue the license on a building by building or section by section basis through some type of restricted occupancy. Mr. Boganey indicated that there is a concern at the staff level about 01/25/10 -1- whether or not a portion of buildings should be occupied. Staff's view is that it would be preferable if there is a way to make sure that all units in a building were brought up to standard in order to obtain the occupancy authority. Beyond that he does not believe there is a concern at the staff level about a building by building, section by section occupancy right under a single license. Mayor Willson stated his position that while he has extreme reservations and concerns with the property, it appears that Mr. Brummer has made good progress and he would like to visit the property. Mr. Boganey stated if the Council is willing to consider lifting the license revocation, it is recommended that staff be directed to meet with the owner and try to reach an agreed upon method to go forward in a way that would work for Mr. Brummer and for the City in terms of managing the process. Staff would come back with a recommendation that has been agreed upon at the next City Council meeting. The majority consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to proceed as outlined above by Mr. Boganey. Councilmember Yelich stressed that the license agreement that is agreed upon is to be a phased in approach, and that he would not support a complete property license at this point. HENNEPIN COUNTY ACTIVE LIVING PROGRAM PRESENTATION Ms. Karen Nikolai, Project Manager for Hennepin County Active Living, provided a presentation on the Hennepin County Active Living Program and answered questions of the City Council. The presentation and discussion focused on the following: • History of Active Living Hennepin Communities • Partners of Active Living • Targeted workshops • Challenges for pedestrians /bikers • Designs for pedestrians/bikers • Vision and mission statements • Guiding principles • Key policies and resolutions to date • Work of the Active Living Program • Active Living "Umbrella" There was discussion on "complete streets ". It was noted that the City Engineer has expressed concern that there should not be a one size fits all method applied to "complete street" implementations. Ms. Nikolai stated that "complete streets" is a portion of the Active Living Program and is not one size fits all. The Complete Streets Policy was adopted by Hennepin County for county roads; it is not being imposed on any of the cities. She stated that partner cities are being asked to adopt a Complete Street Resolution to show MnDOT that there is support. 01/25/10 -2- ' Ms. Nikolai thanked the City for the invitation to attend the Work Session. She stated there is currently $5,000 in funding available to. one additional city to join Active Living Hennepin Communities. There is also a pot of $10,000 available for communities that would like to join the mentoring program, rather than becoming a full member. The majority consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to conduct a comprehensive review of the Hennepin County Active Living Program, to obtain further information about the commitment that would be required from the City, as well as the potential benefits, and to report back to the City Council on the pros, cons, and options available. GROUP HOME REPORT Mr. Boganey provided background information on the item and the Council direction that staff complete an inventory of group homes in the City. Council and staff reviewed the Group Homes Report dated 1/20/2010 outlining the following information: number of group homes; location; type of facilities; status of taxable or tax- exempt; calls for service including code enforcement and other police calls. Mr. Boganey stated that the evidence suggests that the group homes generate more police calls, but predominately for medical reasons, and that these homes are comparable to other rental units as far as nuisance calls. However, the study also shows neighborhoods with high concentrations of group homes, with those numbers growing. He stated the North Metro Mayors Association I has promoted a policy that would allow for distance between group homes; it is likely that policy will be presented at the State Legislature again. This is an issue that Representative Hilstrom has expressed interest in. From staff's perspective there is no reason that the City would not support this legislation. Beyond this, in the absence of a very compelling argument that the homes are hurting the community, getting legislative support will be an uphill battle. The majority consensus of the e Council was to direct staff to provide further information/clarification on the types of group homes that exist in the City, to send a letter to the State Legislature informing them of the City Council's interest and concern about growth in the number of group homes in the City, and to ensure that the North Metro Mayors Association is still addressing concerns on behalf of municipalities regarding group homes. COMMUNITY GARDENS Mr. Boganey reviewed the history of the item. He stated staff is requesting Council direction on the development of a community garden site within the Xcel Energy Transmission Corridor and a neighborhood garden site at 5301 James Avenue. He indicated that ideally there would be a volunteer or others to manage this for the City going forward; however, it can likely be started with a limited amount of staff time. Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel provided an overview of the staff recommendation on community gardens and answered questions of the City Council. O1/25/10 -3- Mayor Willson noted that Allan Hancock and Diane Sannes have an interest in working with community gardens. It was noted that community gardens will likely provide an opportunity to engage diverse and new residents in the community. The majority consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to proceed with a community garden program within the Xcel Energy Transmission Corridor at Colfax Avenue and with establishment of neighborhood garden plots at 5301 James Avenue in accordance with the January 20, 2010, staff report, and to report back to Council with further information. MEETINGS WITH COMMISSIONS Mr. Boganey reviewed the history of the item. At the November 9, 2009, City Council Study Session it was discussed that perhaps there should be a meeting put together with various City boards and commissions. It was undefined as to the meeting format and objectives. Mr. Boganey requested further feedback and direction from the City Council. Discussion ensued on possible formats for meetings with the advisory commissions. Mr. Boganey suggested that a small portion of the meeting include a discussion on specific strategic i goals identified at the City Council Retreat. i The majority consensus of the City Council was to invite the following advisory commissions to attend a meeting with reception -type format, with each commission to provide a brief presentation: 1) Charter Commission; 2) Financial Commission; 3) Housing Commission; 4) Park and Recreation Commission; and 5) Planning Commission. Further refinement on the format and agenda will be discussed at the February 8, 2010, City Council Work Session. i ADJOURNMENT Councilmember /Commissioner Lasman moved and Councilmember /Commissioner Ryan seconded adjournment of the City Council /Economic Development Authority Work Session at i 10:55 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 01/25/10 -4- I I I STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss. Certification of Minutes CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER) The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, certifies: 1. That attached hereto is a full, true, and complete transcript of the minutes of a Work Session of the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center held on January 25, 2010. 2. That said meeting was held pursuant to due call and notice thereof and was duly held at Brooklyn Center City Hall. 3. That the City Council adopted said minutes at its February 8, 2010, Regular Session. P City Clerk Mayor 01/25/10 -5- MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE: January 20, 2010 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development /j ' SUBJECT: Community Gardens COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: City Council direction regarding staff recommendation to develop a community garden site within the XCEL Energy Transmission Corridor and a neighborhood garden site at 5301 James Ave. BACKGROUND: The August 24, 2009 City Council Work Session included a presentation on the Community Garden Programs within the Cities of Hopkins and Brooklyn Park and a general overview of information obtained from the American Community Garden Association on starting a • community garden within the City. The majority consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to conduct further exploration, refine the possibilities, and define the structure of a community garden program. Attached for your reference are the minutes of this Work Session discussion and staff memo. COMMUNITY GARDEN PROGRAM: S ite : The following sites are being recommended for City Council consideration in the development of a 2010 community garden program: - The XCEL Energy Transmission corridor lying east and west of the Colfax Ave. right of way which has the potential of 100 + garden plots. - The vacant lot at 5301 James Ave. acquired through the EDA's Remove & Rebuild Program has the potential of 10 garden plots. Site Control: EXCEL Energy has indicated a willingness to work with the City on the temporary use of their transmission corridor for community garden plots and has provided the attached Garden Permit for Community. The attached permit is being offered at no cost with a $500 refundable damage deposit. 5301 James Ave was acquired for the EDA by our housing consultant, GMHC, in 2009 and is • the process of being conveyed to the City. 1 Conceptual Plot Layouts Concepts illustrating on the potential layout of typical 20'x20' • individual garden plots served by a 4' walkway will be prepared by City staff that will also address the following components: - Identification of a water source - Parking areas - Potential location for a rubbish container and optional sanitation facilities /satellite - Identification signage and optional message board Potential need for decorative landscaping and perimeter fencing. The EXCEL Energy site will also illustrate the potential expansion along the corridor and possible option to acquire interest in adjoining property for a long term or permanent location for this community garden. Program Administration At this time, program administration would follow the examples provided by the current community gardens operated by the Cities of Hopkins and Brooklyn Park. Existing staff would provide the following administrative tasks for the initial garden program: - Development of Operating Policies, guidelines /rules. Gardner's contract - Development of application - Identify program costs and establish fee - Identify target audience and communication options - newsletter, web, media news - Prepare announcements, advertisement and program promotions - Registration - Communicating with gardeners: o Introduction - Kick Off - information on gardening (supplies, etc.) o Exchange of information on gardens o Updates o Harvest time o Fall enroll for next season o Clean up /off season (late October) A portion or all of these activities could be shifted to a garden association or a seasonal volunteer as the programs develops. Carden Plot Develo me Preparation• The annual work activities associated with creating a community garden include: clearing /clean -up of the site, staking and identification of the plots, tilling the soils, and providing a watering source and rubbish containers. Perimeter fencing, sanitation, and wood chips for the walkway appear to be optional. Establishing a Rental Fee: The Hopkins and Brooklyn Park programs have established a garden plot rental fee that covers their City out of pocket costs associated with soil preparation /tilling, staking & identification of the plots, rubbish and sanitation. The City of Brooklyn Park also made capital improvements to their garden plots (water service and perimeter fencing to keep the deer out). • 2 . The rental fee in Hopkins is $12 for their 185 plot garden and the fee in Brooklyn Park is $50 for their 80 plot garden. Budggt Issues A rental fee to cover the City's out of pocket expenses will be projected for each of the garden sites. Modifications to the site preparations completed by the City may be necessary pending on the total number of garden plots to keep the rental fees in the $12 to $50 range. The garden development concepts will also identify the potential expansion opportunities which would require capital improvements and involve other sources of funding that are unknown at this time. COUNCIL POLICY ISSUES: Does the City Council wish to proceed with a community garden program within the XCEL Energy transmission corridor at Colfax Ave? Does the City Council wish to proceed with establishing neighborhood garden plots at 5301 James Ave? • 3 LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 1 City of Brooklyn Center _7 dFek�a — j < `� cake. i atreame yaks D .aEtee _1 �___. _ ___i BM AVE M rF .. - - -. ; _ .......... ...; _..._......_._._.... -.... S MAVEN T . 1 a � i ! p Cv of i �i7RjYO�+� *�(Kt L c Lr.IE T e[ EJIY� • http: / /gis.logis.org/LOGIS ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName - -bc LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersio... 1/20/2010 i Garden Permit For Community Use This Garden Permit ( "Permit") is entered into effective as of the date stated below, by and between Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, d/b /a Xcel Energy ( "NSP ") and City of Brooklyn Center, its successors and assigns ( "Grantee "). WHEREAS, NSP owns a transmission line right -of -way ( "Right -Of -Way ") in fee simple absolute which is located north of and adjacent to Colfax Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, and i WHEREAS, Grantee desires to utilize a portion of the Right -Of -Way for garden purposes, and WHEREAS, NSP is agreeable to granting to Grantee a permit for garden purposes on a portion • of the Right -Of -Way described as follows: The North Seventy-five feet of Lots 20, 21, 23 and 24 in Gould's Riverview Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the duly recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds in and for the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota. and hereinafter referred to as the "Permit Area ", subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE, NSP, hereby grants unto Grantee, a permit to use the Permit Area for garden purposes in consideration of and subject to the following conditions: 1. Upon execution hereof, Grantee shall deposit with NSP $500.00 as a damage deposit, which deposit shall be refundable to Grantee upon termination of this Permit as provided for herein and upon restoration of the Permit Area to a grass field. 2. Use of the Permit Area by Grantee shall not interfere with NSP's utilization of its property in any way. i j 3. Grantee shall be responsible for obtaining any permits from the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota or from any other governmental entity required to use the Permit Area for the purposes granted herein. Grantee shall maintain and keep the Permit Area in an orderly manner consistent with garden use and in compliance with all pertinent laws, codes and ordinances. 4. No permanent or temporary structures and no trees or shrubbery with a mature height In excess of 15 feet shall be located on the Permit Area. • 5. No ground elevation changes shall be made within the Permit Area. I 6. No equipment or materials shall be stored on the Permit Area. 7. No motorized vehicles, recreational vehicles or trailers shall be parked or stored on the Permit Area. 8. Grantee shall assume all liability and indemnify and compensate NSP for any injury or damage to persons or property, including NSP's property or employees, resulting from the use of the Permit Area by Grantee, its agents or invitees. Grantee shall defend, Indemnify and save harmless NSP against all actions, claims, damages or demands which may be brought or made either against NSP or against NSP's Interest In the Permit Area by reason of anything done by Grantee in the exercise or purported exercise of the rights and privileges granted herein. 9. The rights granted herein may not be assigned, leased or sold by Grantee. 10. Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to restrict in any way the continued use of the Permit Area by NSP for its purposes. Grantee is liable for any property or landscaping of Grantee damaged or destroyed by NSP during maintenance, repair, upgrading, construction or re- construction of its facilities or appurtenances thereto upon the Permit Area. 11. This Permit shall remain in effect unless 1) terminated by NSP or Grantee by 30 days' notice to the other party; 2) Grantee no longer occupies the residential lot adjacent to the Permit Area; or 3) revoked for cause by NSP. This Agreement incorporates all agreements and stipulations between the parties and no prior representation or statement, verbal or written, shall modify, add, or change the terms hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be duly executed as of the day of 2010. NORTHER STATES POWER COMPANY GRANTEE By: By: Its: Its: i This Instrument was drafted by: BJA Northern States Power Company 414 Nicollet Mall MP -8 Minneapolis MN 55401 2009.434 i Page 2 of 2 .09/21!04 kab S:1General- Offices- GO- Trans\SLR- Project- Ware house\ Completed_ Projects% WlP \Transmission\0804\211180112009 .434, City of Brooklyn Center Garden Lesse.doo M v v v 1 2 0 SS I GL tt OL * •i a r � A i� x.� �•� r.r..N "" �, �•.,� ._x.... ' u•LCC A x"�; Jt i Win CL 1 H St CL i tt CL ,. trim y of H n•u \�• Q .i a tt rc N ay in a lkfl III [ , y iyj V 14 rJ i ri A o A ^ g 91 ff. N � II'LCC I� F � � 1�ry1 � r• /• r V V \ ^ YI V N V / •. , N•.N „ •_.W.rxr • �I.N,r•Ix „Nw1 tt 1 NINNN ro'tSL •x•N • •„-0' r A IOU 91 61 WIL tt 10 51 61 Ir r+ n Y Q 4 N ., ' I LOGISMap Output Page City of Brooklyn Center . ......... E3 HOldlyldhe Zs4rNt hWt . 4 Lalu�s i ft __._.._._.._.... { .. -- — .ar1u Pa c i I SMAVB N ff ---- _ ------ ---- { _.__. ....; F an AYE M T vean ...e..h.4ws•.yprjwrt;uxfaJ�7ms 0 ]I!h PID: 0211821440054 s/ itx of V , OR ( 1 5301 James Ave N CNATER �' Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 I I Councilmember Yelich requested an update from staff on a timeline to address Council's direction to prepare sign ordinance implementation guidelines. City Manager Curt BOganeY indicated his intent is to include this topic on the next City Council meeting agenda. COMMUNITY GARDENS — COUNCIL IEMBER LASMAN Councilmember Lasman stated she has been approached by residents showing an interest in creating a community garden program in the City. She had provided Mr. Boganey with information provided by the Metropolitan Council on community gardens and information she obtained from the Public Works Director in the City of Hopkins. Mr. Boganey assigned additional information gathering on community gardens to Mr. Eitel. Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel provided a. presentation on community gardens. The presentation included photos and information on Valley Park in the City of Hopkins and Eidum Historic Farmstead in the City, of Brooklyn Park. Mr. Eitel presented an outline on starting a community garden provided by the American Community Garden Association. He presented photos on potential garden plot sites: Xcel Energy T ransmiss ion Line Corridor, Northbrook Church Site; Odyssey Charter School Site; Willow Lane School and Park; and 7e Avenue — Adjacent to Willow Lane Apartments. Mr. Eitel requested discussion and direction on the position of the City Council regarding the City's role in promoting, facilitating, or developing community gardens. He indicated it should _ be noted that there are potential savings associated with a community garden. The City spends approximately $350 for each mowing at 57 and Logan Avenues; this property is normally mowed five to six times per season. There was discussion on the following topics in relation to creating a community garden program: • Examples of community gardens in other municipalities • Costs associated with the program would be covered by the rental fee for garden lots • American Community Garden Association Fact Sheet • Importance of including clear expectations in lot agreements • Possible issues associated with water accessibility for locations that are not adjacent to the river or creek Each member of the City Council stated support for consideration of creating a community garden program. The majority consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to conduct further exploration, refine the possibilities, and define the structure of a community garden program. Mr. Boganey indicated staff will present Council with analysis and options for consideration. ADJOURNMENT i 08/24/09 -2- DRAFT I i i i Work Session Agenda Item No. 2 APRIL 26 2010 COUNCIL WORK SESSION - MINUTES AND STAFF REPORTS RE: COMMUNITY GARDENS MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WORK SESSION APRIL 26, 2010 CITY HALL — COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council/Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to order by Mayor/President Tim Willson at 9:32 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor/President Tim Willson and Councilmembers /Commissioners Kay Lasman, Tim Roche, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director /City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Assistant City Manager /Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Carla Wirth, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. POTENTIAL ACQUISITION OF THE NORTHBROOK APARTMENTS 6037 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD This item was addressed at the Study Session. UPDATE ON THE COMMUNITY GARDENING PROGRAM AND ESTABLISHING A GARDEN PLOT RENTAL FEE Mr. Eitel presented staffs recommendation that the Council consider establishing a Community Garden Program. He advised that it would cost about $8,000 to provide a metered irrigation system. Should that cost be amortized over three to five years, it would require no fewer than 100 rental plots at an annual rental rate of $50 each. Staff also considered the option of a 300 to 500 gallon water storage tank, estimated at $450 to $650 depending on the size. It is felt that a fee of $25 per year would cover the City's out -of- pocket costs. The water storage tank would be portable and can be reused in the event the gardening program is not continued. Mr. Eitel requested City Council input on the following policy issues: 1. Option of providing a community garden program with a temporary water source and without a City water source; 2. Establishing a garden plot rental fee of $25 for the 2010 program; and 3. Direction on pursuing options and potential investments that would enable expansion of the community garden program at this location. The Council discussed whether the City should initiate a garden plot program to determine the level of participation. It was noted this program would meet the Council's goal to engage 04/26/10 -1- residents that are not normally engaged. Mr. Eitel advised that if initiated with a portable water tank, the City may receive additional requests. Mayor Willson noted that the Council originally thought a civic group would be involved with the garden plot program. He expressed concern with how this program would be administered, the aesthetics of a portable water tank, and lack of input from citizens within the community. Mr. Eitel stated if so directed by the Council, staff will accept plot applications, measure out garden plots, and coordinate with the Public Works Department to provide water. Councilmember Roche expressed his strong support for the garden plot program and suggested it would be an economic development ingredient for the 57th and Logan Avenues areas, the most distressed area of the community. He suggested, for the record, that staff research the option of shared services with Brooklyn Park. Councilmember Ryan noted a number of residents are very interested in community gardens and indicated he would support moving forward with a minimum commitment and a plot fee of $25. He suggested that the number of applications received will determine the size of the portable water tank. Councilmember Lasman noted that a fee of $25 per plot for 40 plots would cover the cost for the water tank. She felt people were becoming more interested in gardening and that the costs involved did not present a big risk. She stated the City needs to advertise that it is looking for someone to eventually adopt the program. The Council discussed the operation at the southwest corner of Brooklyn Boulevard and Bass Lake Road that received a grant and expanding its operation. It was noted that Mr. Fern's property was not zoned commercial because it does not have access, and Mr. Fern is aware of that situation. Mr. Eitel advised that the Planning Commission will be discussing administrative use permits and 2010 open market activities. He explained there is a potential for two farmers markets. The majority consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to move forward with a garden plot program with a $25 annual fee, use of a portable water tank sized based on participation, and to include a noise prohibition in the contract. Staff will assess its success at the end of the season. 2010 BUDGET AMENDMENT City Manager Curt Boganey advised of staff efforts to formulate a budget response based on the State's budget and indication that $1,069,310 of LGA was unalloted, leaving $411,554. He explained that if no action is taken, the 2010 adopted budget will have a $411,554 gap. Each department was asked to identify 6% of reductions, consider the implications of potential cuts, and minimize the impact on strategic goals of the Council as much as possible. Mr. Boganey explained the net result of those discussions is over $300,000 of budget adjustments of which $162,000 involve funding shifts that can be justified. The remaining $150,000 would be budget 04/26/10 -2- reductions. He stated this level should be sustainable in the 2011 budget but cautioned that cutting more than this amount would directly impact services or needed staffing position. Mr. Boganey presented the recommended 2010 budget amendments: $325,000 in expenditure /revenue changes; $100,000 in vacant personnel savings; and, $100,000 in use of contingency for a total of $525,000. Mr. Boganey stated the audit will show the City ended last year with a "surplus" of over $700,000, which is significantly more than budgeted. Mr. Boganey advised that revenue surplus could be used to balance the 2010 budget, if need be. Mayor Willson noted the gardening plot program would use almost a full -time position and expressed concern that future State unallotments would result in the City having to cut programs and services and potential layoffs. Mr. Boganey advised the vacant staff positions cannot remain vacant for the remainder of the year without having an impact on the Council's goals. Councilmember Roche pointed out that shared services for the garden plot program will dissipate the concern of staff time and the City needs to be clear it is to be a volunteer effort or the program will not continue. He commended staff for identifying $325,000 in budget amendments and noted the City may shortly receive tax revenue from Brookdale. Mr. Boganey advised that budget adjustments can be made this year but if there are further LGA cuts in 2011, the Council will have to decide between more taxes or cuts in 2011. Councilmember Yelich challenged the assumption that it is a choice between raising taxes or cutting services. He suggested the Council look at how the City can do things differently to accomplish goals more cost effectively. He stated he will be pushing for creative solutions, noting there is an unending source of human creativity. Mr. Boganey stated he will attend a meeting in the next two weeks with ten other cities to discuss shared services. The majority consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to present a budget amendment for Council's consideration. JOINT COMMISSION MEETING FOLLOW UP Mr. Boganey stated at the April 6, 2010, joint meeting, some Commissions requested a response to their proposal or further direction. The Council discussed the activities of the Housing Commission, its desire to play a constructive role, and intention to solicit funds. The consensus of the City Council was that the Housing Commission should not solicit funds for the City. It was suggested the Housing Commission should address the issue of property maintenance and valuations. 04/26/10 -3- The Council then discussed the wide disparity within neighborhoods with regard to property maintenance and whether the City is doing all it can to assure its housing stock. Mr. Boganey explained that the City is limited in its authority so it can only enforce minimum standards. It was suggested the Housing Commission may be interested in organizing a City -wide volunteer effort to identify such areas of need. ! The Council agreed with the suggestion of Mr. Boganey that the Housing Commission be asked to promote efforts to maintain and improve neighborhoods, which would get to the next level beyond City enforcement and promote what citizens are willing to do on a private basis. It was noted that senior housing is a long -term effort and not progressing at this point. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember /Commissioner Ryan moved and Councilmember /Commissioner Lasman seconded adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 10:52 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. I i i i i 04/26/10 -4- i STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss. Certification of Minutes CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER) The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, certifies: 1. That attached hereto is a full, true, and complete transcript of the minutes of a Work Session of the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center held on April 26, 2010. 2. That said meeting was held pursuant to due call and notice thereof and was duly held at Brooklyn Center City Hall. 3. That the City Council adopted said minutes at its May 10, 2010, Regular Session. Ailv City Clerk Mayor I I 04/26/10 -5- COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 20, 2010 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manage{ FROM: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development SUBJECT: Update on Community Garden Program for 2010 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider establishing a garden plot rental fee of $25 for the 2010 Community Garden Program. Background: On January 25, 2010, the City Council Work Session included a report on establishing a Community Gardening within the Xcel Energy Transmission Corridor and on a vacant EDA owned lot. The majority consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to proceed with a community garden program within the Xcel Energy Transmission Corridor at Colfax Avenue and with establishment of neighborhood garden plots at 5301 James Avenue in accordance with the January 20, 2010, staff report, and to report back to Council with further information. Attached for your reference is a copy of the January 20, 2010 report and minutes of the Council's work session on this item. 2010 Community Garden Program: Attached for your review is a draft copy of a Community Garden Application, Community Garden Contract and Community Garden Map for the property within the Xcel Energy Transmission Corridor. The layout for this 75' wide corridor maintains a front yard setback equal to the adjoining residence and a 5 foot setback along the residential property line to the south. A total of 39 garden plots are illustrated on the attached garden map. Letters. have been sent to the property owners. of the 3 large lots adjoining to the north to determine if there may be an opportunity to expand the community gardening to approximately 100 lots with additional area for parking. At this time, one of the property owners has indicated a possible interest in leasing or selling a portion of their lot to the City. An issue which has caused a delay in presenting this program to the City Council has been the absence of economically providing a water source to the garden area. The preliminary costs of providing a metered irrigation system are estimated at approximately $8,000. It is staff's. opinion that amortizing these costs over a 3 -5 year period would require a garden with no fewer than 100 rental plots and an annual rental rate of $50 each. An option which has recently been discussed is the purchase of a 300 or 500 gal water storage tank with a water spout that could be refilled by the City's water truck on an as needed basis. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM The material cost of this option is approximately $600 -$650 for the 500 gal tank and $450 -$500 for the 300 gal. water storage tank. In considering establishing a rental fee of $25, we believe that the out of pocket costs by the City can be covered and that the water storage tank is portable and can be reused by the City in the event a gardening program is not continued at this location or a program that is offered by the City. The program does require staff time to coordinate announcements, registrations, staking of the plots, and monitoring the progress of the garden. It is my understanding that the Public Works water truck, which is used several times on a weekly basis by the department to groom playfields and water city landscaping, could be provided at no or minimal cost to the program. Budget Issues: The material costs for starting this program are proposed to be an EDA expense not to exceed. $1,000. Council Policy Issues: 1. City Council input on the option of providing a community garden program with a temporary water source and without a City water source. 2. City Council input on establishing a garden plot rental fee of $25 for the 2010 program. 3. City Council direction on pursuing options and potential investments that would enable the expansion of the community garden program at this location. Council Goals: Strategic: 4. We will positively address the community demographic makeup and increasing cultural diversity 6. We will respond to increased public awareness and interest in environmental sustainability and green community issues Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust City Council Work Session January 25, 2010 Mr. Boganey reviewed the history of the item. He stated staff is requesting Council direction on the development of a community garden site within the Xcel Energy Transmission Corridor and a neighborhood garden site at 5301 James Avenue. He indicated that ideally there would be a volunteer or others to manage this for the City going forward; however, it can likely be started with a limited amount of staff time. Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel provided an overview of the staff recommendation on community gardens and answered questions of the City Council. Mayor Willson noted that Allan Hancock and Diane Sannes have an interest in working with community gardens. It was noted that community gardens will likely provide an opportunity to engage diverse and new residents in the community. The majority consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to proceed with a community garden program within the Xcel Energy Transmission Corridor at Colfax Avenue and with establishment of neighborhood garden plots at 5301 James Avenue in accordance with the f ; January 20, 2010, staff report, and to report back to Council with further information. C ��� 1 • 1 1 r � N am e: A ddre ss: City: State I • • m Phone: Other Ph E (C ost Plot Number: 1" Choice 21"Choice 3 Choice Mot if one becomes available. Yes, I am interest�dpf renting a see per 1• Rental Fee Per • or o nly) 1 ...;� > S': � �M019 l C.d O( ° 1� ' 1 WICK fE313A0� t1Y 00� B r 0}O�de' 1 C0 C 3f llr � 1.}r {{ tL K*`� r e i a ✓ r '~r i , ,+ y -.� / ,,: i )a i 4 t eQG 00 O� Ulirj, 9t_ ,)r�1[ ? i.3.rt L S1� 4- -1 t ���t �� r. ! � k f � r r i ''r -5 i� -�} �•'It .7.-� U t' r-'v�• T v'� ��'J r > > h 1 F 1 ' y 'c ll � , j,rG � l f • R t � i }' �`j l ,u 721.11x1 }. 'L. { K. -Yf•r { „ .r.tb Sr.. ."4_t„ ,;t; .1 1 - ,x�i..y„ . t �l„ � - 'c� t��� : . {: �. ?Y �3 , t`l.' �:t?. -,.'• � j �, r.G.:.r r ,a�Y w`ii,1_ n d , , .�, - `sv _, , Ct±T,y�ar. City of Brooklyn Center Community Garden Contract Agreement The .City of Brooklyn Center agrees to prepare the garden plot for planting, stakeout the plot, identify the plots by number, and make water accessible to gardener. If a cancellation is requested in writing prior to May 1, 2010, a refund will be granted (excluding cancellation fee). Please review the following program guidelines. 1. Priority will be given to Brooklyn Center Residents and prior year renters. 2. Non - residents will have last priority after resident extra plots are rented. 3. Renters will be on a first -come, first -served basis depending on ayailability. 4. One plot per household unless extra plots are available after May 1. 5. Garden plots are assigned to one person and are not transferrable. Others may garden the plot, but the responsibility for maintenance of the site is assigned to the person that applied for the plot. 6. Fees must be paid at the time of application. Cost is 7. No refunds will be given after May 1. (A $5 cancellation fee applies prior to May 1) 8. The plot must be tended by May 15 If you are planting later, you are still responsible for keeping the plot free from weeds and harvesting through the end of the season. 9. Renter agrees to: e Have something planted by June 10 and keep plot maintained the entire season. • Notify the City if they must abandon their plot. • Keep weeds to a minimum. • Maintain garden within the borders of their plot — no vines encroaching to other plots. • Use only approved certified organic fertilizers that do not affect other plots (no herbicides or pesticides) to keep insects, pests and diseases under control. • Have plot cleaned and cleared by October 31. • Place organic waste in the compost piles in areas identified by the City. 10. If the garden plot is not being maintained, the gardener will be given ten days to correct the situation or the plot may be re- assigned. 11. A 3 ft. chicken wire fence may be in place to protect crops from rabbits and other critters. 12. Plantings must not shade other gardener's plots. 13. Pets are not allowed. 14. Children must be supervised. 15. Motorized vehicles must only use the designated parking area. The Gardener agrees to assume all liability and to indemnify and compensate the City for any injury or damage to person, property or employees by or arising in connection with the use of the premises. The Gardener further agrees to defend, indemnity and hold harmless the City against all actions, claims, damages, or demands, which may be brought or made either against the City's interest in the premises by reason of anything done by the Gardener, in the exercise of purported exercise of the rights and privileges herein granted. The City may terminate a Gardener's use of City property under this Agreement immediately upon violation of any of the terms of this Agreement in connection with the use of the garden plots. The City of Brooklyn Center assumes no liability for accidents or injury to participants or others either on or adjacent to the garden area. The City of Brooklyn Center assumes no responsibility for acts of vandalism or loss of crops or property due to theft. By signing this agreement, I agree to abide by these conditions established for Community Gardens including complying with 11 federal, state and local laws and regulations. Name (Please Print) Signature Date " c) — � pu 3 �� �� ~~^ ID c!! a cn CD � � � � CD ZI | i | | / . 's ' � COLFAX AVE N � . D��\ -------- ^-'-- -' - zc / � � � > BRYANT AVEN -|- ----'- C ty Agenda Council A enda Item No. 6e MAY 10 2010 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - MINUTES AND STAFF REPORTS RE: COMMUNITY GARDENS MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION MAY 10, 2010 CITY HALL — COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:45 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Tim Roche, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Director of Fiscal and Support Services Dan Jordet, Public Works Director /City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Carla Wirth, Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Mayor Tim Willson opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum. John Roder, 6610/6700 Humboldt Avenue N., presented a written request asking the Council to rescind the order given at the last meeting to revoke his rental license. He indicated he had been the owner for ten years and was a six -year resident when he bought the building so he had an interest in Brooklyn Center and appreciated the City's recent rental ordinance modifications. Jo Roberts, 6001 — 78 Avenue N., stated she represents one business and the neighborhoods of Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, and Crystal. She addressed the Council regarding her research of Calls for Service (CFS) at rental properties that the City had licensed and urged the Council to pay attention to CFS prior to considering renewal of rental licenses. Mayor Willson asked Ms. Roberts whether she would share that data with the City Manager. Ms. Roberts answered in the affirmative and asked staff to contact her. Mr. Boganey asked whether the CFS being referenced meet the definition under the ordinance. Ms. Roberts answered in the affirmative, noting her source is the Police Department and she will provide staff with that documentation. Gordy Johnson, 57 and Colfax Avenues, stated the six residents in attendance all live in the block proposed for a community garden. He explained that while they do not oppose community gardens, this neighborhood is too small. 05/10/10 -1- John Roder, 6610/6700 Humboldt Avenue N., referenced the comments of Ms. Roberts and offered an example of a police officer responding to a complaint of loud music but when the officer arrives, the loud music is not found so the call is determined to be unfounded. Judy Johnson, 57`" and Colfax Avenues, stated all on their block are gardeners and not opposed to community gardens but think a better location would be a park or school where there is adequate parking, garbage and recycle receptacles, and a place for children to safely play while parents are gardening. Mayor Willson apologized on behalf of the Council for straying from its established policy of obtaining community input when acting on the community garden issue. Lori Hengel, 5700 Colfax Avenue, stated her agreement with Ms. Johnson's comments and noted this is a dead end street that cannot handle traffic or parking from a community garden. She felt a better location could be found. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 6:59 p.m. I Motion passed unanimously. 2. INVOCATION Councilmember Roche provided a reflection on the importance of mothers. 3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 7:00 p.m. 4. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Kay Lasman, Tim Roche, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Director of Fiscal and Support Services Dan Jordet, Public Works Director /City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Carla Wirth, Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA 05/10/10 -2- Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, as amended, to remove Items 6c, 6d, and 6e, and the following consent items were approved: 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. April 26, 2010 — Study Session 2. April 26, 2010 — Regular Session 3. April 26, 2010 — Work Session 4. May 3, 2010 — Board of Appeal and Equalization Continuation 6b. LICENSES FIREWORKS - PERMANENT Holiday Station Stores, Inc. 420 66`" Avenue N. FIREWORKS — TEMPORARY STAND TNT Fireworks — Cub Foods 3245 County Road 10 MECHANICAL Cornerstone Mechanical 11315 Florida Avenue, Champlin Louis Degidio Services, Inc. 21033 Heron Way, Lakeville United Heating A/C 1295 Hackamore Road, Medina MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIP Luther Brookdale Buick GMC 4301 68 Lane N. Luther Brookdale Chevrolet 6701 Brooklyn Boulevard R.L. Brookdale Motors 6801 Brooklyn Boulevard RENTAL — STANDARDS PRIOR TO MARCH 6, 2010 INITIAL (two-year license) 6819 Humboldt Avenue N. A 10 1 Raymond Charest 6819 Humboldt Avenue N. A203 Raymond Charest RENEWAL (two-year license) 490161 " Avenue N. Antonio Smith (passed with weather deferral) 5425 Irving Avenue N. Nathan Pollock 6825 Scott Avenue N. Douglas Pederson RENTAL — CURRENT STANDARDS INITIAL (TYPE II — two year license) 5432 Dupont Avenue N Xiangming Guan 6607 Beard Avenue N. Ernie Zheng RENEWAL (TYPE I — three-year license) 5407 Brooklyn Boulevard Duane Orn 05/10/10 -3- (passed with weather deferral) 5319 Queen Avenue N. Karen Pelak 5115 Twin Lake Boulevard E. Ruth Cioni 5901 Aldrich Avenue N. Scott & Vickie Huber 6724 Toledo Avenue N. Steve & Cheryl Schleif 4118 Woodbine Lane Ron & Jeanette Blasewitz RENEWAL (TYPE II — two-year license) 5200 France Avenue N. Christian Knutson SIGNHANGER Signs by RSG 6080 Highway 10, Ramsey Sign Source 7660 Quattro Drive, Chanhassen 6c. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONTRACT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2010 -01, 02, 03, AND 04, DUPONT AREA NEIGHBORHOOD STREET, STORM DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS This item was considered as Agenda Item l Oc. 6d. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONTRACT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2010 -05, 06, 07, AND 08, TWIN LAKE AREA NEIGHBORHOOD STREET, STORM DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS This item was considered as Agenda Item l Od. 6e. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES FOR COMMUNITY GARDEN PLOTS IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER This item was considered as Agenda Item 8a. Motion passed unanimously. 7. PRESENTATIONS / PROCLAMATIONS /RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS 7a. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE FOR BOND RATING UPGRADE FROM SPRINGSTED /STANDARD & POORS TO THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Kathleen Aho, Springsted, described the municipal bond rating process and noted the City's rating increased by two "notches" from A+ to AA. In addition, the credit rating agency attributed the City with a categorization of "stable," meaning they expect Brooklyn Center to be able to retain that rating. Ms. Aho offered Springsted's congratulations and presented Director of Fiscal and Support Services Dan Jordet with a plaque commemorating the AA upgrade. 05/10/10 -4- Mr. Jordet thanked Springsted for this recognition on behalf of the City. He recognized that this accomplishment is not just for the Fiscal and Support Services Department but for every City Department, the City Manager, and the Council for making decisions on use and allocation of funds. 7b. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING TO THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Mr. Jordet described the application process for a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting and read in full the plaque received for the 2008 financial report. He recognized the contribution of Assistant Finance Director Clara Hilger for putting this information together and thanked the City Manager for his support, the Council, and citizens. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to accept the plaque commemorating bond rating upgrade from Springsted and Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. Motion passed unanimously. 8. PUBLIC HEARING 8a. (FORMERLY CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 6e) RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEE FOR COMMUNITY GARDEN PLOTS IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Councilmember Ryan stated the matter before the Council is the establishment of a fee for community garden plots to cover the City's expenses. However, he requested the item be removed from the Consent Agenda to address the appropriateness of the location. He urged the Council to reconsider its provisional decision to locate community gardens at the Xcel property north of the 5700 block of Colfax Avenue. Councilmember Yelich stated he also supports the Community Garden Program; however, as discussed at the Study Session, the City did not take the necessary steps in site selection by contacting neighbors so he would apologize for that. He indicated support to move forward in the future because it is an important component for building community if done in a more acceptable manner to find an appropriate location. Councilmember Yelich moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to table consideration of establishing a fee for community garden plots in the City of Brooklyn Center. Councilmember Roche asked whether staff's recommendation to not proceed is due to poor soil quality. Mr. Boganey stated the quality of the soil at that location is one issue but other issues are significant factors as well. Councilmember Ryan recognized the attendance of residents from this neighborhood and stated he visited them last Thursday when they made their valid concerns clear should the program 05/10/10 -5- move forward. He indicated he would not support a community garden at this location due to the objections of the neighborhood and wants to assure proper guidance is given regarding the need to address setback, parking, and nuisance issues that may occur from a community garden. Mayor Willson noted if this consideration is tabled, the $25 fee may need to be adjusted depending on when it is reconsidered and the garden location. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Willson thanked Mr. Eitel of all of his work on the Community Garden Program. 8b. ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -05 AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND (SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF BROOKLYN BOULEVARD AND 71 AVENUE) City Manager Curt Boganey introduced the item and stated the purpose of the proposed ordinance. Mr. Eitel presented the background of the property located on Brooklyn Boulevard and described the proposed addition to the adult education building, three -story parking structure, a redesign of access and internal movement within the parking lot of the Early Child Learning Center, and access improvements from 71" Avenue North. It was noted the Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions. Mr. Lillehaug presented an aerial map and described the realigned intersection to guide and encourage traffic from this building and school to Brooklyn Boulevard and closure of two driveways off Perry Avenue. It was noted bus access to the school will be from Brooklyn Boulevard instead of Perry Avenue. Staff is confident these road improvements will result in decreased traffic on Perry and 71" Avenues. However, it is estimated 70 new trips per day will come to this site using Perry and 7I Avenues, which will offset the decrease resulting from the road improvements. Mr. Lillehaug presented traffic volumes as measured last week and indicated staff does not see any traffic issues that need to be mitigated based on volumes. However, if a safety issue arises or there is an extreme increase in traffic volume, it. will be addressed by the City through the City's Traffic Advisory Committee. He noted the significant roadway improvement as well as signal modifications will be paid by the developer. Mr. Lillehaug recommended the City continue its support of this project with the improvements as recommended. The Council noted staff has given a lot of thought to traffic issues, how they can be addressed should something arise, and a baseline measurement has been made so it can be objectively known if there is a change. The question was raised who would cover the cost if mitigation is needed after the project is constructed. Mr. Boganey stated all of the improvements the City believes need to be made have been proposed and the developer is paying the vast majority of 05/10/10 -6- the costs associated with those improvements. In the future, if an improvement needs to be made on a public right -of -way street, it will be the costs of the City. Councilmember Yelich raised the issue of projects that result in unforeseen negative impacts and questioned who would be liable for those negative impacts. He noted in this case, the City is considering amending the Zoning Ordinance to allow a private development project. Mr. Boganey advised that impact fees would cover such a cost but in Minnesota, cities do not have the statutory authority to charge such a fee. Mayor Willson asked whether it has been common practice to use a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for rezoning of property. Mr. Eitel stated the practice of using a PUD is fairly common for rezonings and noted in this case the PUD is due to a minor adjustment to an interior setback between two property owners who are making the request. If not for the lot line move, a PUD would not be needed and the City would not have been able to negotiate the closing of the Perry Avenue parking lot access, roadway improvements, and driveway closures. He advised that PUDs allow the City more flexibility in adjusting and coordinating the development of property for the common good of the community. Councilmember Ryan referenced the resident suggestion to close 71 Avenue west of Brooklyn Boulevard in the interest of reducing traffic. Mr. Lillehaug advised that the data does not support a road closure and there are other City streets with more traffic than Perry Avenue will experience. Mayor Willson cautioned the Council is charged to make decisions based on the information presented. He indicated the project is warranted, he saw no rationale to change plans or ask the developer to pay more money, and he welcomed it to the City. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Roche seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Brian Crux, 7060 Perry Avenue, stated his concern with the safety of his and neighborhood children because the volume of shortcut traffic is already high and traveling too fast. He believed the development would change the character of this residential neighborhood and that the City should consider issues like installing a cul -de -sac, the intensity of use, number and types of traffic, size of roadways, and that there are no sidewalks or walkways to get to the townhomes. Mr. Crux explained why he believed the project would greatly devalue his property and suggested the project be located in downtown Brooklyn Center where there are acres of vacant land, a rezoning would not be needed, and a parking ramp is needed. Dale Magnuson, 4830 71 Avenue N., concurred with the statements of Mr. Crux. He indicated that every homeowner in America has the right to reasonable use of their property and he believed this project compromised his right to enjoy his property. In addition, it removes three viable homes, one -half of his neighborhood, that pay taxes to the City, County and State. Mr. Magnuson questioned the need to increase the size of the intersection to handle traffic that staff 05/10/10 -7- says will not be there. He expressed concern for the safety of his grandchildren, commented on short cut traffic coming from the west, and encouraged the City to protect the viability of this neighborhood and consider use of the Brookdale Center property that is currently available. Mayor Willson clarified that the City does not own the Brookdale Center property. Judy Thorbus, 6265 Brooklyn Drive, stated that the Community Emergency Assistance Program (CEAP) and the Adult Educational Facility may have different hours. She expressed concern with traffic congestion and requested clarification on points of access for the parking ramp. Mike Schraad, Welsh Construction and representing CEAP and the School District, offered to answer questions of the Council. i Heather DeFrance, 7049 Perry Avenue, stated she has three children and agrees with her neighbor's comments. She indicated they are open to having a cul -de -sac that would help protect the neighborhood and thanked staff for closing exits onto Perry Avenue. Councilmember Roche moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. The Council discussed the option of installing a cul -de -sac at the Perry and 71 Avenues intersection. Mr. Lillehaug estimated the cost would be $25,000 and described the pattern of traffic circulation to and from the site. He noted a cul -de -sac could be three to four houses into the neighborhood or if located at the intersection it would be less expensive to install. Mr. Lillehaug answered questions of the Council regarding the available range of traffic calming options and stated he thinks the roadway realignment will encourage more drivers to use Brooklyn Boulevard. The Council acknowledged that absent this project, there is still a problem with cut through traffic from 69 Avenue to Perry Avenue. i Councilmember Ryan stated his support to move forward with this project as long as all traffic calming options remain available, should the need arise. i Councilmember Roche stated his support for this project, noting it is a perfect place for redevelopment. He noted there are many solutions available should an issue arise and he hoped the neighbors would grant trust to staff that this will be monitored. Councilmember Yelich stated the City's engineers have done due diligence to analyze traffic impact but thinks the City is "taking out a $25,000 insurance policy" since that is the cost of a cul -de -sac to mitigate a possible impact to those residents as a result of this development. He stated he believes this will be a good development, but he is sensitive to the concerns of the neighbors about traffic impact. Councilmember Roche moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -05, An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Code of Ordinances regarding the 05/10/10 -8- Zoning Classification of Certain Land (Southwest Quadrant of Brooklyn Boulevard and 71 Avenue). Motion passed unanimously. 8c. ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -06 RELATING TO MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS; AMENDING CITY CODE SECTIONS 29-401,29-402, AND 29 -403 City Manager Curt Boganey introduced the item, discussed the history, and stated the purpose of the proposed ordinance, explaining that State Law had been amended to move the Primary Election date up to the second Tuesday in August. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Roche seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -06, an Ordinance Relating to Municipal Elections; Amending City Code Sections 29- 401, 29 -402, and 29 -403. Motion passed unanimously. 8d. ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CODE, SECTIONS 4.01 AND 4.02 City Manager Curt Boganey introduced the item, discussed the history, and stated the purpose of the proposed ordinance. He noted the Charter Commission had met; however, it had not made a recommendation to the City Council on this charter amendment ordinance. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to continue the Public Hearing on An Ordinance Amending Chapter 4 of the City Charter, Sections 4.01 and 4.02 until such time as the Charter Commission makes its recommendation to the City Council. Motion passed unanimously. 8e. ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -07 RELATING TO CAMPAIGN SIGNS; AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 34 -140 I 05/10/10 -9- City Manager Curt Boganey introduced the item, discussed the history, and stated the purpose of the proposed ordinance, explaining that State Law had been amended to move the Primary Election date to the second Tuesday in August, resulting in an earlier date to place campaign signs. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 2009-07, An Ordinance Relating to Campaign Signs; Amending City Code Section 34 -140. Motion passed unanimously. 8f. ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -08 RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF THE CLEAR VIEW TRIANGLE; AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 25 -802 City Manager Curt Boganey introduced the item, discussed the history, and stated the purpose of the proposed ordinance. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Tom Arneson, 6825 Abbott Avenue, stated his property has trees at all four corners that would be within this sight triangle as well as some light poles. It was explained that the ordinance, if adopted, would provide the City with more flexibility within the sight triangle. Councilmember Yelich moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Roche moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -08, An Ordinance Relating to the Definition of the Clear View Triangle; Amending City Code Section 25 -802. Motion passed unanimously. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 05/10/10 -10- 9a. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2010 -007 SUBMITTED BY VANGUARD CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR A PUD AMENDMENT AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 6,757 SQ. FT. MULTI- TENANT OFFICE BUILDING. THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION AT ITS APRIL 29, 2010, MEETING 1. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -80 REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2010 -007 SUBMITTED BY VANGUARD CONSTRUCTION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, JOHNCO ADDITION Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel provided an overview of Planning Commission Application No. 2010 -007 and advised the Planning Commission recommended approval of the applications at its April 29, 2010, meeting. The Council indicated the parapet is well reorientation and an asset. The applicant was asked to address the neighborhood concern about the potential for a 24 -hour operation. Craig Moss, 2350 Wycliff Street, St. Paul, advised they are in preliminary discussion with some restaurants but none plan to stay open 24 hours. The Council acknowledged that litter is under control and reports from the Police Department have indicated loitering has been dealt with adequately. It was suggested Mr. Moss contact the Police Department and other business owners to collaborate on those efforts. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -80 Regarding the Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2010 -007 Submitted by Vanguard Construction for the Development of Lot 2, Block 1, Johnco Addition. Motion carried unanimously. 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 10a. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -81 DECLARING EARLE BROWN DAYS AS A CIVIC EVENT FROM JUNE 24 THROUGH JUNE 26, 2010 Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -81, Declaring Earle Brown Days as a Civic Event from June 24 through June 26, 2010. Motion passed unanimously. i 10b. AMENDMENT OF 2010 GENERAL FUND AND UTILITY OPERATING BUDGETS 1. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -82 AMENDING THE 2010 GENERAL FUND 05/10/10 -11- BUDGET City Manager Curt Boganey introduced the item, discussed the budgetary impact, and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution. He reviewed the additional cuts identified by staff and that the proposed shifts from the General Fund to the Utility Fund are justified since those expenses directly benefit utility operations. However, there will probably not be additional shifts for future consideration. Councilmember Yelich stated he is glad to hear that shifts from the Utility Funds have come to an end, noting these shifts make it difficult from a financial planning standpoint. Councilmember Yelich moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2010-82, Resolution Amending the 2010 General Fund Budget. Motion passed unanimously. i 2. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -83 AMENDING THE 2010 UTILITY FUND BUDGETS I Councilmember Yelich moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -83, Amending the 2010 Public Utility Fund Budgets. Motion passed unanimously. 10c. (FORMERLY CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 6c) RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -84 ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONTRACT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2010 -01, 02, 03, AND 04, DUPONT AREA NEIGHBORHOOD STREET, STORM DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Mayor Willson noted the low bid amount was $2,489,652.24, the estimated budget was $3,459,000, and amended to $3,210,770.24, an approximate 7.2 percent decrease. He stated this speaks volumes about the City's staff in how they put out bids, secure those bids, and the economic times. Mayor Willson moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -84, Accepting Bid and Awarding a Contract, Improvement Project Nos. 2010 -01, 02, 03, and 04, Dupont Avenue Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements. The Council asked whether quality standards of materials are assured. Mr. Boganey advised that quality standards are part of the bid specifications, testing is conducted, and inspectors are on site to ensure quality. Mr. Boganey recommended, as part of the budget process and CIP, that staff research whether the CIP should be moved forward a little faster to take advantage of the competitive bidding environment. The Council indicated support for staff to research that option. Motion passed unanimously. 05/10/10 -12- 10d. (FORMERLY CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 6d) RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -85 ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONTRACT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2010-05,06,07, AND 08, TWIN LAKE AREA NEIGHBORHOOD STREET, STORM DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Mayor Willson noted the low bid amount was $3,433,246.65, the estimated budget was $5,604,000, amended to $4,207,896.65, an approximate 24.9 percent decrease. Councilmember Roche moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -85, Accepting Bid and Awarding a Contract, Improvement Project Nos. 2010 -05, 06, 07, and 08, Twin Lake Area Neighborhood Street, Storm Drainage, and Utility Improvements. Motion passed unanimously. 11. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember Yelich deferred his report in the interest of time. Councilmember Lasman reported on her attendance at the following: • April 27, 2010, Robbinsdale Legislative Action Coalition meeting held at the Brooklyn Center Library to address budget issues being faced by school districts and cities • May 1, 2010, Brooklyn Center Annual Prayer Breakfast, which was well attended • May 3, 2010, Reconvene of the Board of Appeal and Equalization Councilmember Roche reported on his attendance at the following: • May 3, 2010, Board of Appeal and Equalization • May 4, 2010, Highway Investment Study meeting where he obtained information on Highway 252 Councilmember Roche announced the May 12, 2010, Crime Prevention event scheduled for 6:00 p.m. He commented on the offerings of the Park and Recreation program this summer including swimming lessons. Councilmember Roche also commented on the good press received by the City today on Channel 12 news when Mayor Willson spoke about the City and projects, and the I StarTribune Metro Section article that included quotes from Mayor Willson. Councilmember Ryan highlighted one event he attended on April 27, 2010, at the Hennepin County Brookdale Library that was sponsored by Robbinsdale School District 4281 with a presentation by Minnetonka City Manager Gunyou on the State's budget shortfalls. He noted that Mr. Gunyou was very knowledgeable and had formerly been the Budget Director for Governor Carlson. Mayor Willson stated he had nothing to add in addition to the events already reported on by other Councilmembers. I 05/10/10 -13- Councilmember Lasman reminded all of the May 21, 2010, Crime Prevention Golf Tournament and advised that hole sponsorships remain available and contributions are welcome. 12. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Yelich seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 9:03 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 05/10/10 -14- STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss. Certification of Minutes CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER) The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, certifies: I. That attached hereto is a full, true, and complete transcript of the minutes of a Regular Session of the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center held on May 10, 2010. 2. That said meeting was held pursuant to due call and notice thereof and was duly held at Brooklyn Center City Hall, 3. That the City Council adopted said minutes at its May 24, 2010, Regular Session. am&4 City Clerk Mayor I 05/10/10 -15- • DATE: May 4, 2010 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development SUBJECT: Resolution Establishing Fees For Community Garden Plots in the City of Brooklyn Center Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider the adoption of the Resolution Establishing Fees For Community Garden Plots in the City of Brooklyn Center. Background: The August 24, 2009 City Council Work Session included a presentation on the Community Garden Programs within the Cities of Hopkins and Brooklyn Park and a general overview of information obtained from the American Community Garden Association on starting a community garden within the City. The majority consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to conduct further exploration, refine the possibilities, and define the structure of a community garden program. The January 25, 2010, the City Council Work Session included a report on establishing a Community Gardening within the Xcel Energy Transmission Corridor and on a vacant EDA owned lot. The majority consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to proceed with a community garden program within the Xcel Energy Transmission Corridor at Colfax Avenue and with establishment of neighborhood garden plots at 5301 James Avenue in accordance with the January 20, 2010, staff report, and to report back to Council with further information. On April 26, 2010, the City Council Work Session included a report which identified financial issues relative to providing an irrigation system/source of water, the conceptual layout for a 39 plot garden layout within the Xcel Energy Corridor, draft guidelines and application. The consensus of the Council was to proceed with a 2010 pilot garden program with the use of temporary water storage tank and a $25 rental fee to cover out of pocket costs by the City. Council Goals: Strategic: 4. We will positively address the community demographic makeup and increasing cultural diversity 6. We will respond to increased public awareness and interest in environmental sustainability and green community issues • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES FOR COMMUNITY GARDEN PLOTS IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER I WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center has discussed the creation of a community gardening program at the following work sessions: August 24, 2009, January 25, 2010 and April 26, 2010; and i WHEREAS, the City established that there would be a cost associated with establishing garden plots, allowing access to water and coordinating the Community Garden Program; and i W IEREAS, the City established that there would be costs associated with a program providing rental garden plots, including a water storage tank in lieu of an irrigation system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, that a fee be adopted for rental of a Community Garden Plot as follows: Community Garden Plot Rental Fee $25.00 • BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that this resolution shall be effective I Date Tim Willson, Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i • I ' i r: ! i b Uj }13 1k} 15 j2 34 .. 36 9TH 3� Z 3 O ; + € ! i tL � I 9t s 4 J O } 57TH AVE N ( Business and Development Community Garden Map March4,20,0 npr IGL1' , 20' x 20' Gardens with 5' �'mys MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION MARCH 15, 2011 COUNCIL COMMISSION ROOM CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center Housing Commission was called to order by Chairperson Lawrence - Anderson at 7:06 p.m. ROLL CALL Chairperson Kris Lawrence- Anderson, Commissioners Kathie Amdahl, Chereen Norstrud, and Judy Thorbus. Also present were Council Liaison Carol Kleven and Staff Liaison Tom Bublitz. Commisssioner Ephraim Olani was absent and excused and Commissioner Groves was also absent. APPROVAL OFAGENDA There was a motion by Commissioner Amdahl and seconded by Commissioner Norstrud to approve the agenda as submitted. The motion passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — FEBR UARY 22, 2011 It was noted the February minutes will be presented at the April Commission meeting. The motion passed. CHAIRPERSON REPORT Chairperson Lawrence- Anderson noted that she had attended a burglary prevention presentation at the Police Department and brought up the issue of the reduction of land lines which may be an issue with regard to 911 calls. She noted not all cell phones have GPS built in and perhaps the police i to department could address this issue at an upcoming neighborhood meeting the topic being 911 and cell phones. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT Councilmember Kleven discussed the Brookdale redevelopment also known as the Shingle Creek Crossings. Commission members reviewed a rendering of the proposed development. DISCUSSION OF COUNCIL 2011 STRATEGIC GOALS Chairperson Lawrence - Anderson noted Strategic Goal No. 6 regarding environmental sustainability and noted that unless there is anything in the City Charter regarding a requirement for mailing, she suggested considering trying a pilot to do email delivery of agendas rather than hard copies. Commission members discussed the issue of agendas and concluded that they would like to receive their agendas via email but also have a hard copy available at the meeting. Commissioner Thorbus stated that she would still like to receive a hard copy prior to the meeting. Page 1 3 -15 -11 Commission members continued to discuss Strategic Goals in light of their recent discussion on Community Gardens. Commission members agreed that they could do research on Community Gardens but could not do a project without Council directive and staff resources and support. Chairperson Lawrence- Anderson also suggested that the Commission continue to work on and stabilize the city's new neighbor welcome program and move it forward as a goal for 2011. Commission members discussed the addition of high school students to assist with collating material and distributing material. The staff liaison briefly discussed a memo he had prepared for staff consideration regarding ricks and insurance coverages of volunteers and stated he had prepared this just so the specific risks could be outlined and defined. Chairperson Lawrence- Anderson stated that, if high school students are involved, they would be supervised and accompanied by Housing Commission members and Neighborhood Watch Captains. She suggested that the group could meet at the high school and that two adults would be assigned with one student. Commission members discussed the use of high school students in the new neighbor welcome program, noting that it would provide the students with a volunteer opportunity. NEW NEIGHBOR WELCOME PROGRAM Commissioner Thorbus suggested the Commission distribute welcome bags two week nights a month. Commission members discussed the delivery dates and agreed that the welcome bags should be delivered on the 2" a and 4 th Wednesdays of each month. It was estimated that the delivery could include six high school students, six Watch Captains and six Commission members. The Commission agreed to do the first distribution of Welcome Bags on April 13 and would plan to meet at the Brooklyn Center High School. If no high school students are available on that date, the Chair would send an email to Commission members. EARTH FEST EVENT APRIL 16, 2011 Chairperson Lawrence - Anderson noted that since the Commission could not collect compact fluorescents at the Earth Fest event, they would have to do something else in order to participate. The staff liaison noted he had recently seen a mercury video at a seminar and noted that it was quite impressive showing how mercury volatilizes rapidly in the atmosphere when exposed to air. Chairperson Lawrence- Anderson noted that examples of where mercury is found in residential and every day uses could also be included if this is a possibility for the Earth Fest program. Commission members continued to discuss Earth Fest but no commitment was made to attend the Earth Fest event. Page 2 3 -15 -11 UPDATE ON COMMUNITY GARDENS Commissioner Amdahl reviewed her documents she had prepared based on Brooklyn Park's material including rules and regulations and a general time line for a Community Garden program. Commission members discussed the Community Garden program and agreed that the first year would be the most time intensive in terms of time commitment in establishing a community garden program. Commissioner Norstrud stated she had contacted the City of Bloomington and spoken with Mara Evans. She noted the Bloomington program has small plots, 10 ft. by 15 ft. at a cost of $33 a plot. Gardners can rent up to three plots. She stated Bloomington has no running water but they do have water tanks that city water trucks fill for gardeners. She added that no hoses are allowed in the Bloomington Community Gardens. She further noted that only organic fertilizer is allowed and that a 6 ft. high chicken wire is allowed to keep animals out. The program in Bloomington begins in March of each year. Commissioners discussed the potential Commission role in establishing a Community Garden program. Chairperson Lawrence- Anderson stated that the Commission could do the research on establishing a Community Garden and would be prepared to complete what the City Council wants the Commission to do.in terms of establishing a program by this coming fall and winter. Commission members continued to discuss Community Gardens noting that it is linked to a Strategic Goal and that the Commission would like to know if the Council wishes them to pursue researching and developing a model for a Community Gardens program. OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Thorbus and seconded by Commissioner Norstrud to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed. The Brooklyn Center Housing Commission adjourned at 8:36 p.m. Chairman Page 3 3 -15 -11 MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION FEBRUARY 22, 2011 COUNCIL COMMISSION ROOM CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center Housing Commission was called to order by Chairperson Lawrence - Anderson at 7:03 p.m. ROLL CALL Chairperson Kris Lawrence - Anderson, Commissioners Kathie Amdahl, Tracy Groves, Chereen Norstrud, and Judy Thorbus. Also present was Staff Liaison Tom Bublitz. Commissioner Ephraim Olani was absent. Council Liaison Carol Kleven was absent due to a previous commitment relative to City Council activities. Also in attendance was invited guest Mary Pat Black, Parks and Facilities Manager for the City of Brooklyn Park. APPROVAL OFAGENDA There was a motion by Commissioner Amdahl and seconded by Commissioner Norstrud to approve the agenda as submitted. The motion passed. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — JANUAR Y 18, 2011 There was a motion by Commissioner Amdahl and seconded by Commissioner Groves to approve the minutes as submitted. The motion passed. CHAIRPERSONREPORT Chairperson Lawrence - Anderson stated that the March Housing Commission agenda would be primarily devoted to the New Neighbor Welcome program which will begin again in April. She also noted she met with District 286 school representative Jodi Rossi to discuss the addition of high school students to partner with the Housing Commission on the New Neighbor Welcome program. She also ststed she will be attending the Brooklyn Center Business Association meeting this Thursday where City Manager, Curt Boganey will be the speaker. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT In the absence of Councilmember Kleven, the Council Liaison report was deferred. DISCUSSION REGARDING COMMUNITY GARDENS The Housing Commission welcomed Mary Pat Black, Parks and Facilities Manager for the City of Brooklyn Park. Ms. Black gave an overview of Brooklyn Park's Community Gardens program including the following information: • The program started in 2009 at the Eidem homestead with 80 plots. These plots are typically Page 1 2 -22 -11 gone by the end of April. • The plots are 20 ft. by 20 ft. and rent for $50 per plot. • Many Community Garden users are from single family homes and not just from apartments or townhomes. • Ms. Black distributed copies of Brooklyn Park's Community Garden application and rule sheet and reviewed them. • The City encourages organic gardening at the Community Garden plots. Water is provided n f a water line and faucet or from a nearby h by the City, either through installation o Y drant. Y • In 2010, the program expanded to Fair Oaks School Park with 36 additional plots added. This year the program will expand to Southbrook Park at 63r and Douglas with 73 more plots, some of which will be managed by the City of Crystal. Ms. Black emphasized the "community building" nature of the Community Gardens program and entertained questions from Commission members. In response to a question from Commissioner Norstrud, Ms. Black pointed out the cost of installing a water line at Eidem Farm was approximately $2,000, which included the cost of running lines and installation of a spigot. She added that water from hydrants can be used if available. Ms. Black pointed out additional information regarding the costs of the program including: • Tree Trust was used to install a deer fence around the plots. • The water cost is approximately $650 a year, portable toilets cost $390 a year, garbage pick- up is $320 a year with $150 per container for garbage and waste management is done by city staff. In response to questions from Chairperson Lawrence - Anderson, Ms. Black pointed out that most of the produce is raised for personal use and she is not aware of any large scale sales of produce. Additionally, with regard limiting height of items grown in Community Gardens, growers can't shade neighbor's crops with items such as tall corn, etc. She pointed out that the gardens pretty much manage themselves. She also noted City Staff brought in wood chips and the garden users laid down the wood chips to create a path around the garden areas. Chairperson Lawrence- Anderson inquired as to the time commitment of staff. Ms. Black replied that the program is a small part of her job but that other staff members also contribute including parks maintenance staff and community center staff. Ms. Black went on to explain that people must plant their crops by the end of May and that flowers may also be planted on garden plots. With regard to communication, Ms. Black pointed out that the City has a Facebook page for comments and City Staff calls and a -mails garden users if they need to communicate with gardeners. In response to a question from Commissioner Groves regarding advertising, Ms. Black pointed out that the program is advertised on the City's website, through brochures and on the TV running at Page 2 2 -22 -11 City Hall. In response to a question about parking, Ms. Black stated that parking has not been a problem even where on- street parking is needed. Typically, she pointed out there is not a need for more than a half a dozen parking spaces at a time. In response to a question from Commissioner Groves regarding location requirements, Ms. Black pointed out that the key needs for location are water and soil quality noting that the City did soil testing at $50 per test done by the University of Minnesota. With regard to start up of the program, Ms. Black stated she received information from the City of Minneapolis on their program and received a grant through Hennepin County to do some additional initial work. In conclusion, Ms. Black pointed out gardening activities usually run from May 14 through October of each year. Ms. Black left the meeting at 7:50 p.m. Commission members continued their discussion of Community Gardens. Commission members discussed Community Garden issues relative to Brooklyn Center including, potential locations, pointing out that city parks could be a good location for future Community Gardens. Commissioner Thorbus stated that it would be helpful to know how long a program takes to start from conceptual discussion to the initial start up. Commission members continued to discuss Community gardens and it was decided that Commission members and staff would look into various items relative to Community Gardens in Brooklyn Center including the following: • Commissioner Groves would look further into the City of Minneapolis program. Commissioner Norstrud would investigate Bloomington's program. Commissioner Amdahl stated she would review the documents from Brooklyn Park's program for adaptation to Brooklyn Center. • Staff liaison was to do additional research and report back to the Commission on possible locations in the city and additional information available from the city's previous investigation into Community Gardens. • Commissioner Thorbus will look at location issues and will contact School District 279. OTHER BUSINESS The staff liaison reported on the option of conducting a compact fluorescent bulb drop off at the upcoming Earth Fest. He pointed out he contacted Hennepin County Environmental Services and was informed that, if the Commission conducted a bulb drop off, it would be considered a hazardous waste drop -off which would necessitate various controls in terms of the drop -off site. Also, the bulbs would have to be delivered to a processing site and that it would have to be done Page 3 2 -22 -11 by a licensed hauler and taken to a licensed facility which could not include the County drop off site which is for residential customers only. The staff liaison pointed out that he is also looking into potential liability issues with regard to the city's insurance coverage of volunteers as it pertains to the inclusion of high school students and that he would report to the Chair on his findings. p There was no other business. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Amdahl and seconded by Commissioner Norstrud to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed. The Brooklyn Center Housing Commission adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Chairman Page 4 2 -22 -11