HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 08-20 CCP Regular Session }
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
AUGUST 20, 1984
7:00 p.m.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Open Forum
5. Approval of Consent Agenda
-All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests,
in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
* _
6. Approval of Minutes August 6, 198 4
* 7. Performance Bond Release - Showbiz Pizza Place, 5939 John Martin Drive
8. Resolution Declaring September 16 to September 22, 1984 as Crime
Prevention Week in Brooklyn Center
9. Review of City's Policy on Removal of Diseased Shade Trees on Boulevards
-This item is in response to a request made at the July 23, 1984 City
Council Open Forum session.
10. Resolutions:
* a. Adopting Joint Cooperation Agreement with Urban Hennepin County
-This resolution continues the Community Development
Block Grant
Program for another three years.
b. Approving Specifications for Furnishing and Delivery of Bleachers and
Press Box and Directing Advertisement for Bids
-The bleachers and press box will be installed in Evergreen Park.
Funding for these items will be from the capital projects fund.
e. Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids
ver reen Park /Area Improvement Project or E No. 1984 -07, Phase II p J
Evergreen
(Contract 1984 -I)
-This contract provides for installation of a soccer field and tr ail
lighting system, a soccer field sprinkler system, area landscaping and
construction of a pumphouse over existing well pump No. 4.
* d. Accepting Work under Contract 1984 -D (Lift Station Improvement Project
No. 1983 -09, Phase II)
-This contract provides for the furnishing of a mobile generator to
power the City's lift stations in the event of a power failure. The
supplier has delivered a unit meeting the specifications.
CITY CoUtI'rIL AGENDA -2- August 20, 1984
* e. Accepting Work under Contract 1984 -E (Water Main Improvement :Project
No. 1984 -02 and Water Service Repair Project No. 1984 -06)
-This resolution accepts the water main installation along Lee and
Major Avenues from 69th Avenue to 70th Avenue and 70th Avenue from Lee
Avenue to Major Avenue under Improvement Project No. 1984 -02, and
water service repairs in the south industrial district under
Improvement Project No..1984 -06.
f. Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Providing for Hearing on Proposed
Assessment for Improvement Project No. 1984 -02 (Water Main
Installation on Lee, Major, and 70th Avenues)
* g. Canceling Special Assessment on Highway Right of Way
-This resolution cancels'a special assessment which was
inappropriately levied against I -94 right of way in 1979•
* h. Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Providing for Hearing on Proposed
Assessment for Improvement Project No. 1984 -03 (Halifax Avenue and
70th Avenue Street Improvement)
* i. Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Providing for Hearing on Proposed
Assessment for Improvement Project No. 1984 -04 (Shingle Creek Turn
Lane Construction)
* j. Providing for Hearing on Proposed Assessments
-This resolution provides for establishment of assessment hearings for
Diseased Shade Tree Removal Costs; Public Utility Hookup Charges;
for Delinquent Public Utility Accounts; Delinquent Weed Removal
Accounts; and Nuisance Abatement Costs.
k. Approving Purchase of a Microprocessor for Use by the Vehicle
Maintenance Division
-This item was considered at the August 6 Council meeting, and tabled
with a request for additional information.
11. Planning Commission Items: (8:00 p.m.)
a. Planning Commission Application No. 84027 submitted by H. E. Homes,
Inc. for site and building plan and special use permit approval for an
office condominium development on the land presently occupied by
residences addressed 7020 and 7040 Brooklyn Boulevard. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of Application No. 84027 at its August
9, 1984 meeting.
b. Planning Commission Application No. 84028 submitted by H. E. Homes,
Inc. for preliminary plat approval to resubdivide into two parcels the
land contained in the lots addressed 7020 and 7040 Brooklyn - Boulevard
and 7025 Halifax Avenue North (St. Alphonsus Church). The Planning
Commission recommended approval of Application No. 84028 at its August
9 1984 meeting.
CITY COUNCIL AGLI,'DA -3- August 20, 1984
c. Planning Commission Application No. 84029,submitted by Group Health,
Inc. for site and building plan approval to construct a 20' x 20'
storage garage in the northea t portion of the clinic site at 6845 Lee
Avenue North. The Planning Commission recommended approval of
Application No. 84029 at its August 9, 1984 meeting.
d. Planning Commission Application No. 84030 submitted by Sharon McNamara
for special use permit approval to conduct a home beauty shop in the
basement of the residence at 6725 Quail Avenue North. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of Application No. 84030 at its August
9, 1984 meeting.
12. Recommendation for Suspension of On -Sale Club License for Brooklyn Center
American Legion Post No. 630
13. Discussion Items:
a. Ad Hoc Citizens Advisory Committee for Earle Brown Farm Development
14. Consideration of Specified License - Taxicab License for Yellow Cab
Company
15. Application for a Class B Gambling License from Earle Brown
Parent /Teachers Association
- Approval of Class B License (requires a majority vote of the City
Council to pass)
- Waiver of the $10,000 fidelity bond (requires a unanimous vote of the
City Council to pass)
*16. Licenses
17. Adjournment
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
AUGUST 6, 1984
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by
Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:02 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis. Also present were Director of Public Works Sy Knapp, Director of Finance _
Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning & Inspection Ron Warren, City Attorney Richard
Schieffer, and Administrative Assistant Tom Bublitz.
INVOCATION
The invocation was offered by Mayor Nyquist.
OPEN FORUM
Mayor Nyquist noted the Council had not received any requests to use the Open Forum
session this evening. He inquired if there was anyone in the audience who wished to
address the Council. There being none, he continued with the regular agenda items.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Nyquist inquired if any of the Council members requested any items removed
from the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Theis requested item 9c be removed from the
Consent Agenda.
PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASE
There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to
release the performance guarantee on Evergreen Estates, 857 to 885 70th Avenue North
(Planning Commission Application No. 82031) in the amount of $3,000. Voting in
favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting
against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES FOR 1984 PRIMARY ELECTION
There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to
appoint the election judges for the September 11, 1984 primary election as per the
list submitted to the City Council by the City Clerk. Voting in favor: Mayor
Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none.
The motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -115
Member Bill Hawes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 19834 (MUNICIPAL SERVICE
GARAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -28, PHASE III)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
8 -6 -84 -1-
Gene Lhotka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in:favor
thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and
the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared
duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -116
Member Bill Hawes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1984 -C (STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NOS. 1984 -03 AND 1984 -04)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Gene Lhotka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and
the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared
duly passed and adopted. .
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -117
Member Bill Hawes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN CROMER MANAGEMENT,
INCORPORATED AND THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR AN EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Gene Lhotka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and
the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared
duly passed and adopted.
LICENSES
There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to
approve the following list of licenses:
AMUSEMENT DEVICE - OPERATOR LICENSE
Pizza Factory 6816 Humboldt Ave. N.
Snyders Brookdale Center
GARBAGE AND REFUSE HAULERS LICENSE
Crosstown Sanitation 10110 38th Ave. N.
ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
Jaycee Women 4152 Welcome Ave. N.
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS LICENSE
The Energy Barn 17441 Highway 10 E.
Flare Heating 664 Mendelssohn Ave. N.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES JULY 23, 1984
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve the minutes of the City Council meeting; of July 23, 1984 as submitted.
Voting in favor: Mayor Tlyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Hawes, and Theis. Voting
f , �,
aEjinst: none. The motion passed. Councilmember Scutt abstained from the vote
as she was not present at the July 23, 1984 meeting.
RESOLUTION'S (CONTINUED)
Administrative Assistant Bublitz introduced a Resolution Establishing Sidewalk
Improvement Project No 1984 -14 and Accepting Proposal for Construction Thereof.
He explained the project provides for construction of sidewalk along the west side
of Humboldt Avenue from Amy Lane northerly to 72nd Avenue as recommended by the
Administrative Traffic Committee.
The Director of Public Works reviewed the existing sidewalk system in the area and
explained the request was from residents in the neighborhood and was directed at
children crossing Humboldt Avenue at 71st and 72nd Avenues where there are adult
crossing guards. He explained, children who live on Amy Lane apparently walk in the
street along Humboldt Avenue to the 72nd Avenue intersection where a school crossing
guard provides access to the Evergreen School area. He explained the proposed
sidewalk would bring children to the adult crossing guards
Councilmember Theis inquired whether the sidewalk fits into the City sidewalk plan
and whether other areas similar to this exist in the City. The Director of Public
Works explained he did not check the 1970 sidewalk plan but he believes the sidewalk
would fit into that plan. He added that there are also other areas in the City with
similar situations.
Councilmember Lhotka stated that if a similar request will be forthcoming from the
appear to be
cheaper to do the project all at
'n it would a e P J
residents aloe Woodbine, p
g � Pp
once. The Director of Public Works stated that a lower price on unit prices could
possibly be received but essentially this project is responding to a request from a
specific neighborhood. He added that the City should be able to get a good price on
the project.
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -11$
Member Rich Theis introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1984 -14 AND ACCEPTING
PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION THEREOF
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and
the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared .
duly passed and adopted.
Administrative Assistant Bublitz introduced a Resolution Approving Purchase of a
Microprocessor for Use by the Vehicle Maintenance Division.
The Director.of Public Works explained the purpose of the microprocessor is to
utilize the Vehicle Management System Program recently developed by LOGIS. He
explained the program is designed to keep track of operating costs of specific
pieces of equipment and that this is currently done manually. He explained the
program is designed to obtain a better idea. of the costs for equipment, such as down
time and repair costs. He pointed out the pay back will be improved information for
management decisions on what vehicles and equipment to trade or when to buy or repair
equipment.
8 -6 -84 -3-
Mayor Nyquist questioned whether the $750 per month operational cost would be an
ongoing cost. The Director of Public Works explained the cost would be ongoing and
that the same amount of information obtained manually would require additional
personnel, but that the cost of the new system would be higher than the cost of the
manual information the City is currently generating.
Councilmember Lhotka inquired as to the longterm pay back in terms of dollars. The
Director of Public Works replied that currently the City spends between $100,000 to
$150,000 for new equipment annually, and that the equipment maintenance cost is
approximately- $300, 000 per year. He added that a savings of 51, would provide a pay
back almost immediately and that the City should be able to expect a 5% savings with
the new system.
Councilmember Theis inquired whether the system was interfaced with the
computerized gas pumps and whether or not the system would interface with the City's
accounting system. The Director of Public Works explained the equipment
management system is interfaced with the accounting system and as an example the
system could generate purchase orders. He also noted that the cost of gas, labor
and parts could be entered through the microprocessor.
Councilmember Scott inquired if there was any problem with future time availability
on the computer as other cities come on to the system. The Director of Public Works
explained that this was a concern of the Public Works Directors and that LOGIS had
assured the City there is adequate time, even with other cities coming on line in the
future.
Councilmember Hawes asked how many vehicles would be covered by the system. The
Director of Public Works explained that the vehicles range from light to heavy and
run from lawnmowers to squad cars all the way up to heavy equipment. He added that
the system could also be applied to the City, s lift stations. Initially, he stated
150 units would be put on the system with eventually as many as 250 to 300 units.
The Council continued its discussion of the proposal and expressed certain concerns
over the cost of the program. Councilmember Lhotka stated that he feels cost is a
big factor and that he currently does not have enough information to justify the
purchase of the microprocessor.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
table consideration of the Resolution Approving Purchase of a Microprocessor for
Use by the Vehicle Maintenance-Division until the August 20, 1984 City Council
meeting to allow staff more time to prepare additional information for the City
Council.
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 84024 SUBMITTED BY DR. JOHN B... LESCAULT FOR -
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL TO EXPAND AN EXISTING CHIROPRACTOR'S OFFICE HOME
OCCUPATION AT 6142 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD
PLANNING COI APPLICATION NO. 81025 SUBMITTED BY DR. JOHN B. LESCAULT FOR A
VARIANC FRO SECTION 34 -140 OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE TO ALLOW A 24 SQ. FT. HOME
OCCUPA1I011 SiUNI AT 6142 LROOKLYN BOULEVARD
The Director of Planning & Inspection presented and reviewed for Council members
pages 1 through 5 of the July 26, 1984 Planning Commission meeting minutes rand also
the Planning Commission information sheet prepared for Application No. 8 He
U reviewed a transp.}rency of the :subject p ircel.:Ihowing its loc ation �;nd noted
thr,,t the parcel was zoned R1. He explained the home occupation has been conducted
at the location since 1974 under an administrative ruling indicating that it was a
permitted use. The Director of Planning noted that since 1974 various Planning
Commission and City Council rulings have placed a chiropractor's office under the
home occupation requirements of the City zoning ordinance..
The Director of Planning & Inspection reviewed the applicant's letter, site survey
and building plans describing the home occupation and the proposed addition. He
also noted that Dr. Lescault desires to bring in a nonresident employee who would be
an intern from a local college. The Director of Planning then reviewed a
transparency showing the proposed expansion. He also reviewed the parking
requirements for the site.
The Director of Planning & Inspection stated that, following a public hearing on the
application at which a neighbor of Dr. Lescault spoke, the Planning Commission acted
on the application. He explained the Planning Commission at its August 9, 1984
meeting recommended approval of Application No. 84024, subject to ten findings,
conditions and considerations which he reviewed for Council members.
The Director of Planning & Inspection next reviewed Planning Commission Application
No. 84025 and noted that the applicant was requesting a variance from the City sign
ordinance. He noted the applicant was requesting approval of a variance from
Section 34 -140 to allow a 4' by 6' 24 sq. ft. illuminated sign for the chiropractor's
office in the residence at 6142 Brooklyn Boulevard. He added the City sign
ordinance allows home occupation signs to be no larger than 2.5 sq. ft. He next
reviewed the standards for a variance specified in the City's zoning ordinance.
The Director of Planning & Inspection pointed out that at the Planning Commission,
after a public hearing on Application No. 84025, recommended denial of the
application on the grounds that the standards fora sign ordinance variance were not
met in this case.
The Director of Planning & Inspection pointed out that a public hearing on the
applications is required and that the applicant is present this evening.
Mayor Nyquist expressed a concern that the Council is faced with a dilemna in that
logic indicates that the area in question is different from a typical residential
zone. However, he pointed out the zone is R1 and it is apparent to him that the City
should look into developing a policy on redevelopment. The Director of Planning &
Inspection noted that the Planning Commission has not made any recommendations
against the residential expansion in this case, only for the home occupation.
expansion.
Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Planning
Commission Application Nos. 84024 and 84025, and inquired if there was anyone
present who wished to speak at the hearing.
Mayor Nyquist recognized the applicant Dr. Lescault who stated he believes his house
meets all the setback requirements and that he did not anticipate having quite such a
problem when he submitted this application. He added that he is building the
expansion for convenience and that he is a small "mom and pop" operation. He also
noted he lacks sufficient land to be able to request commercial zoning. He stated
• he knows that the letter of law must be applied evenly, however, he believed his
8 -6 -84 -5-
request would create a different situation in a more quiet residential area as
. opposed to Brooklyn Boulevard.
Mayor Ny uist inquired if there was anyone else who wished to speak at the public
Y q
hearing. No one requested to speak and he entertained a motion to close the public
hearing.
There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to
close the public hearing on Planning Commission Application Nos. 84024 and 84025.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
Councilmember Lhotka inquired as to the status of property on Brooklyn Boulevard
regarding commercial versus residential uses. The Director of Planning &
Inspection replied that the City's Comprehensive Plan has some specific
recommendations for this area and that the Planning Commission recommends
conversion of Dr. Lescault's property and the surrounding property to a C1 zone. He
added the Comprehensive Plan acknowledges the need for changes in land use but does
not take any action to change it. He explained the City's current role is one of
reacting to proposals for development and that the other alternative would be for
the City to take a more proactive role in redevelopment along Brooklyn Boulevard.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
approve Application No. 84024, subject to the following findings, conditions and
considerations:
1. Special use permit approval is deemed necessary for the home
occupation in question in light of the following factors:
a. the extent of the home occupation use within the dwelling
unit
b. the level of traffic generated by the home occupation
c. the use of equipment not normally found in a residential
dwelling unit
d. the employment on the premises of one nonresident employee
2. Special use permit approval is subject to all applicable codes,
ordinances and regulations and any violation thereof shall be
grounds for revocation.
3. The special use permit is issued to the applicant as operator of
the facility and is nontransferable.
4. Special use permit approval acknowledges employment on the
premises of not more than one nonresident employee.
5. A chemical fire extinguisher shall be installed in the area of the
home occupation.
6. The hours of operation shall not be later than 6 :00 p.m. with no
hours on Sunday.
7. All parking associated with the home occupation shall be off-
street on improved space on the applicant's property.
8. Special use permit approval acknowledges use of the five rooms in
the southerly portion of the residence, an area of approximately
545 sq. ft. for the home occupation use.
9. Special use permit approval specifically forbids the expansion
of the dwelling or any accessory structure or use of other space
than that outlined in Condition No. 8 above to be used for the home
occupation on the grounds that such expansion of the use cannot be
justified under the standards contained in Section 35 -220 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
10. Special use permit approval is exclusive of all signery which is
subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances.
In discussion of the motion, Councilmember Hawes stated he believes this home
occupation has gone beyond the scope of home occupations, and that he believes the
Council should seriously look at the definition of what a home occupation is.
Councilmember Theis stated that he agrees with the motion but that the area is
certainly not a residential area.
Upon a vote being taken on the motion, the following voted in favor: Mayor Nyquist,
Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The
motion passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
deny Application No. 84025 on the grounds that the standards for a sign ordinance
variance are not met in this case. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers
Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed
unanimously.
MOTION ON REDEVELOPMENT POLICY
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
authorize the staff to proceed on the preparation of a Redevelopment Policy for
Brooklyn Boulevard. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka,
Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 84026 SUBMITTED BY BROOKDALE COVENANT CHURCH
FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL TO OPERATE A MEDIATION, RECONCILIATION, AND
COUNSELING CENTER IN THE FORMER PARSONAGE OF BROOKDALE COVENANT CHURCH AT 5139
BROOKLYN BOULEVARD
Mayor Nyquist turned the meeting over to Mayor Pro tem Scott and indicated he was
doing so because he was on the Board of Trustees of the Church and would, therefore,
refrain from any consideration of this item. Mayor Nyquist left the Council table
at 8:20 p.m.
The Director of Planning & Inspection presented and reviewed for Council members
pages 5 and 6 of the July 26, 1984 Planning Commission meeting minutes and also the
Planning Commission information sheet prepared for Application No. 84026. He
8 -6 -84 -7-
reviewed the location of the subject parcel and noted that the zoning of the parcel
was R1. He then reviewed the applicant's letter requesting the special use. 0
The Director of Planning & Inspection pointed out that following a public hearing on
the application, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No.
84026, subject to four conditions which he reviewed for Council members. He then
noted a public hearing was scheduled for the application this evening and that a
representative of the applicant was present.
Mayor Pro tem Scott opened the meeting for the purpose of public hearing on
Application No. 84026.
Mayor Pro tem Scott recognized Mr. Dwight Johnson, Vice Chair of the Church Board.
He explained that he was active in the Brooklyn Center Mediation Project and that the
church membership has given approval of the proposal.
Mayor Pro tem Scott recognized Mrs. Barbara Jensen with the Brooklyn Center
Mediation Project. Mrs. Jensen explained that she was enthused about sharing the
facility with the other organizations and felt that it would be a positive addition
to the community.
Mayor Pro tem Scott inquired if there was anyone else who wished to speak at the
public hearing. No one requested to speak and she entertained a motion to close the
public hearing.
There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to
close the public hearing on Application No. 84026. Voting in favor: Mayor
Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none.
The motion passed unanimously.
Councilmember Hawes stated he would abstain from voting on the application because
of his affiliation with the Mediation Project.
There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to
approve Application No. 84026, subject to the following conditions:
1. Permit approval is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances,
and regulations and any violation thereof shall be grounds for
revocation.
2. The special use permit is issued to the applicant for a Mediation,
Reconciliation and Counseling center use and is nontransferable.
3. Building permits are subject to review and approval by the
Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the
issuance of permits.
4. Special Use Permit approval acknowledges that the Mediation,
Reconciliation, and Counseling center will not be operated
currently and /or in conflict with Brookdale Covenant Church
services. Parking for the Mediation, Reconciliation and
Counseling Center shall be off - street on space provided in the
Brookdale Covenant Church parking lot.
Voting in favor: Mayor Pro tem Scott, Councilmembers Theis and Lhotka. Voting
against: none. Mayor Nyquist and Councilmember Hawes abstained from the vote.
Mayor Nyquist returned to the Council table at 8:30 p.m.
ORDINANCES
Administrative Assistant Bublitz introduced An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the
City Ordinances Changing the Zoning Classification of Certain Land. He noted the
ordinance is offered for a first reading this evening and comprehends Planning `
Commission Application No. 84013 which is the H.E. Homes proposed office
condominium project on Brooklyn Boulevard.
The Director of Planning & Inspection explained the reason for bringing the
ordinance to the Council this evening is to not delay the issuance of building
permits for the project. He explained the final adoption of the ordinance will be
contingent on the filing of the final plat.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
approve for first reading An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances
Changing the Zoning Classification of Certain Land and to set the public hearing
date for the ordinance on the 10th day of September, 1984 at 8:00 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
adjourn the meeting. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka,
Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 8:34 p.m.
Deputy City Clerk Mayor
8 -6 -84 -9-
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection
FROM: Gary Shallcross, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: Performance Guarantee
DATE: August 14, 1984
The following performance guarantee is recommended for release:
1. Showbiz Pizza Place
5939 John Martin Drive
Planning Commission Application No. 81053
Amount of Guarantee - $5,000 reduced from $30,000
Obligor - Showbiz Pizza Place, Inc.
Original guarantee of $30,000 was reduced to $5,000 on October 3,
1983 to insure viability of landscaping installed in 1983. All
landscaping is viable in accordance with the approved plan and
rooftop mechanical equipment is now screened. Recommend total
release.
Approved by a de
Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection
Member introducedthe following resolution and
moved 'its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
s RESOLUTION DECLARING SEPTEMBER 16 TO SEPTEMBER 22, 1984
AS CRIME PREVENTION WEEK IN BROOKLYN CENTER
WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Crime Prevention Fund is a citizen's organization
founded by the Brooklyn Center Rotary and Chamber of Commerce and incorporated in
May 1982; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Brooklyn Center Crime Prevention Fund is to
make money available for privately negotiated rewards, educating the public on how
they may contribute to the prevention of crime and for use in identifying and preventing
illicit activity; and
WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center Crime Prevention Fund is planning activities
for the week of September 16, 1984 to September 22, 1984, including an open house
at the police department, a joint luncheon with the Brooklyn Center Rotary and Chamber
of Commerce, three neighborhood forums and a walk- a -thon, and
WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center City Council supports the efforts of the
Crime Prevention Fund in Brooklyn Center.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center that the week of September 16 to September 22, 1984 is hereby declared as
Crime Prevention Week in Brooklyn Center.
Date Mayor
ATTEST: .
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution�'was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof
and the following against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
y'
*01 Shingle Creek Parkway
rr enter. MN 55430
siephons: �V uw �� �.:,.. J u � �+.�►�
� (�� 1 ;D
61 -5443 - Answered 24 -hrs. �I V`�c:rJl...
rime Tips:
61 -6649 August 8, 1984
1E BER ORGANIZATIONS: Mayor Dean Nyquist
Brooklyn Center Chamber 5637 Brooklyn Boulevard
of Commerce Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55429
3rooklyn Center Fire
Dear Mayor Nyquist:
Association
3rookiyn Center Historical The Brooklyn Center Crime Prevention Fund is planning a
Association "Crime Prevention Week" which is scheduled for September
Brooklyn Center Jaycees 16 - September 22, 1984. We will kick off the week with
an open house at the Police Station on Sunday,
'Brooklyn Center Jaycee 16; there will be several forums throughout the week at
Women various locations; we will end the week with the walk -a-
Brookiyn Center Leisure thon on `Saturday, September 22, which brings me to the
Time purpose of this letter. The Crime Fund is asking you,
as Mayor to declare this particular week as "Crime Prevention
8: Center Lioness .Week ".
We appreciate your support of the Crime Fund and should you
.Brooklyn Center Lions feel free to contact me.
y have any questions, please •
Club
Brooklyn Center Police Sincerely,
Association -
, Brooklyn Center Rotary
Zrooklyn Center Women's Phil Cohen
Club President
Brooklyn Center
-B rooklyn Twins Crime Prevention Fund
- (Community Emergency
Assistance Program) PC : Cmg
.forth Suburban Kiwanis
BROOKLYN CENTER CRIME PREVENTION FUND
BALANCE SHEET
Receipts 1982 1983 1984*
Donations $ 3491.00 $ 4457.00 $ 2029.00
Interest 29.00 211.00 307.00
Walk -A -Thou 0.00 3093.00 -0.00 -
TOTAL $ 3520.00 $ 7761.00 $ 2336.00
Disbursements
Operating Expenses $ 432.00 $ 1205.00 $ 247.00
lWalk -A -Thou 0.00 930.00 0.00
Rewards 1050.00 100.00 547.00
TOTAL $ 1482.00 $ 2235.00 $ 794.00
CASH BALANCE $ 2038.00 $ 7564.00 $ 9106.00
*Through August 15, 1984
Note: $325.00 is currently set aside for outstanding rewards.
Gr ime-tighting gro
............
scrambles for funds
By Ellen Foley said the board had no choice but to
Staff Writer lay her off.
Volunteer crime prevention activi- Jeff Mohr, president of the group, ;
ties in Bloomington have come al said other cities that focus crime f {
most to a standstill since May, when prevention efforts on a tipster re
the Bloomington Citizen Crime Pre- ward line have been successful at azz F x s ;
vention Association ran out of money soliciting large sums from business-
and laid off its executive director. es. r
The association has stopped publish- Don Groen, president of the Bloom•
Ing its newsletter, its crime tipsters' ington Chamber of Commerce, said y
reward fund is almost bankrupt and crime prevention may not be a high F t E a s h
its officials say the organization priority for business leaders becauser 3 s r
could lose the momentum it has built crime is more prevalent in residen• x a
up over the past three years. ttal areas than business areas in
Bloomington.
The problem, said executive director
Barbara Rutherford, is that the asso However, the chamber is selling tick -
ciation has been unable to convince ets to Wednesday's Twins game as
Bloomington businesses and rest- part of a fund- raiser for crime pre- ' $ a
dents to donate the approximately vention, and it will review the needs ° "A. t
f w
$30,000 a year needed for supplies of the Bloomington Citizen Crime
and her salary and benefits. Prevention Association, Groen said.
The group, one of the region's larg- Mohr said he also will advocate that `` 4
est crime prevention organizations, the city hire a volunteer services 't `"
distributes warning leaflets in neigh- director, who could direct the assoc i-
borhoods where rapes or burglaries ation and other city hall volunteers.'
have occurred and It sponsors a
court watch program that tracks He has contacted city service associ-
judges to make sure they follow sen- ations and asked Police Chief Jerry
tencing guidelines. It helps produce Putman to help solicit support from
a cable TV program to advise resi- them.
dents on crime prevention, it con -
ducts an Ice cream social at the "I'm just very confident that the J
police station to acquaint residents community will be behind us;' Mohr
with officers, and provides a Hallow- said. "It just seems to me that a'
een haunted house. project such as ours that gets as # " & v !`
many volunteers is appreciated."
This year the 500-member body ! Staff Photo by Tom Sweeney
raised about $20,000, Rutherford
said, but by May it had just $1,600 in Bloomington Police Officer Uncle Miller and Barbara Rutherford dis-
..u_.�.__ . . ..
its treasury and a $2,800 tax bill. She . _ played light timers that the crime- proven group is selling. , . • _ _
w � 4
i
i
r
So me officials say �# �V
�o
1! 07
6 h '4 y
p ocket money
� V
f pie ��'�
for police pays off 5 �
By Jim Adams avoid entrapment or other improper y • 1" a �.
Staff Writer actions. "You don't want 30 or 40 a s {
ambassadors each interpreting poll
A man recently released from prison cy In different ways;' he said.
stopped to talk with Eden Prairie
Detective Dan Carlson, The man had Although certain Minneapolis offi-
no money, so Carlson gave him $25. cers are given cash to buy drugs or k
A relationship of sorts began. pay informants, patrolmen are not. ^¢; a
Cops are wonderful, but in my ex-
When the man was later arrested for perlence, they will find a way to
bur to he told P y y
g ry, police the location send whatever move 'the are ! z
of $2,500 worth of computer equip- given, even if they have to account
ment that had been stolen from for it, said Police Chief Ton Bouza. '* �.� `
Eden Prairie High School. "Some "Giving them $25 would be a persis t ` r
credibility had been established," tent drain with no insurance that it °" , r' ,
»�� ;
Carlson said. "The $25 brought back would be used intelligently."
$2,500 in computer equipment."
Wayzata Police Chief David Brehm
Eden Prairie is one of several cities disagreed. He said the pocket money
in the metropolitan area that provide must be used cautiously with stria- �=
patrolmen with $25 in pocket money gent rules, but its value is worth the x
from city crime prevention funds to risk of misuse.
Pay for tips, to get an informant a
meal, buy illegal drugs or use in "If you can trust a guy, like we do
other ways that may help solve with officers today, to relieve people
crimes. of their civil rights, to carry weapons
and to (be able to) shoot people; if J Q ; "
a Other cities providing cash include you can't trust him to carry $25, we t k, . e.
Wayzata, Hopkins, Golden Valley have
a the wrong people (as offi• i r fr 5 6
and the South Lake Minnetonka o- cers)," Brehm said. "If a y 3 + "
P for 25 1 can to makes
k to
Ii
ce force, which serves tour Lake a mistake S r
Minnetonka communities. Police in about it later." '_ t g ,
those departments said they have
had no problems with using the Three of Wayzata's seven officers`
pocket money. have chosen to carry the cash since Staff Photo by Bruce Sisping
it became available to months ago,
Advocates Eden Prairie Detective Dan Carlson said his $25 in pocket money from city crime prevention funds "brought back S2,5t)O in computer
that strict c are necessary, but occurred when an undercover offi- equipment" to Eden Prairie High School. °
ready money sometimes buys infor• cer needed money to buy drugs,
mation that otherwise would be lost. Brehm said. He pooled his money his pocket, that can't do anything but that helped solve about seven of Eden Prairie officers have used officers can be asked to display their
Other authorities, however, are wary with the other two officers to make encourage him in his job," he said. them, he said. pocket money since 1877. Eden Prai- $25 at any time and must inform
of giving patrolmen cash to spend the buy, which led to the arrest of a rie Chief Jack Hacking said four offi- parents of juveniles before giving 1
without the officers first obtaining St. Louis Park woman in June. Hopkins Chief Earl Johnson has set South Lake Minnetonka police have cers once pooled their cash to post them cash. "We don't just have offi - i
approval for its use from 5upervi- up crime prevention funds with $25 used pocket money about seven bait for a man they arrested who, in cers running around with money In.
sots, Only certain Edina officers can car- available to officers in Hopkins and times in the 2y years it has been return, provided information en- their pockets to spen
d on some
ry cash, but Police Chief Craig Swan- in the South Lake Minnetonka de- available, said Chief Richard Young abling police to solve two burglaries thing Hacking said.
"You don't give an officer money son said making pocket money avail-. partment, where he was formerly In one case, an officer spent $14.24 and a vandalism incident.
and let him make the rules," said able to all patrol officers is a good chief. Since the program started six on a meal for an informant whose
Minnetonka Police Chief Richard idea. "If an officer doesn't feel he months ago, Hopkins officers have information led to the recovery of Officers must sign for the cash and
Setter. He said a supervisor's advice has to jump another hurdle (by re used the cash in more then 12 drug stolen antiques valued at more than report how it was used, although
is necessary to ensure that police questing cash) and has the money in and theft cases, gaining information $10,500, Young said. informants aren't revealed. He said
x J .p ,
e µ+
im
Ar
bbb
Y i
a 5 #C t
s `
• �. 4 x� � 1 ���: s # t ¢ g:, �A.� Rk+G � ,?tg�o� .w s � ''Al�Zg.<"
xz .
Staff Photo by David Brewster a
r
Neighbors chatted Tuesday night on a sidewalk on Vincent S. From left were Desyi Barrett, Kay b
Hubbard, Chet Hursh and Kathy Pruno. d,
99 a
City residents 'tin na tion a l a
c i n to con ba crime F
I,arg^_ numoers of Minneapolis peo- "The people have taken to the idea c
pie joined a "National Night Out" o and are enjoying it," he said, esti- r
anticrime campaign Tuesday night. mating that as many as 10 million l
They sought to fight crime, indirect- x, sr people nationwide would take part. '
ly, by socializing for an hour or so z. T
with their neighbors. "y Tn Minneapolis, the evening began
with a concert in Whittier Park by 1
The coast-to-coast plan was based on w k the police department band, a crime
the belief that when neighbors know ? prevention skit and a massive bat- I
each other they are likelier and bet _ . T loon release, said Gunnar Larson'of I
ter able to help protect one another Community Crime Prevention.
from burglars and other criminals. C F.
Minneapolis participation in last
Florence Pfeifer, a south Minneapo - .. ' ' ,: night's experiment was sponsored by
Its block leader who was hostess to a f �` Community Crime Prevention, a city
neighborhood group on her front I �, agency. Some groups had organized
porch, said she got involved in dessert parties, marshmallow roasts
crime watch activities after her hus , potluck dinners, barbecues and vol-
band died and someone tried to s leyball games.
break into her house.
Rain dampened some of those activi-
Her neighbors have meetings and ties but Lucy Gerold, Community
exchange such information as vaca- Crime Prevention director, said a
tion periods when houses will be Florence Pfeifer spot check in her neighborhood
empty, she said, adding: "'We neigh- showed many porch tights burning
bors all watch out for each other." porch lights and sit outside between and neighbors getting together.
9 and 10 p.m. to put a dent in a
Across the nation, residents of hun- "ridiculous" crime wave, said Matt Gerold, who said her home was bur-
dreds of communities in 20 states Peskin. Wynnewood, Pa., director of glarized, about six years ago, was ;
joined in the effort, in which resi- the National Association of Town
f dents were asked to turn on their Watches, which organized the event. Campaign continued on page 6l3 a
P pa a Ipafgn Centinued from page 18
hostess for a neighborhood gathering group said the effort was intended to
• on the porch of her south Minneapo- show the effectiveness of an alert
Its home. neighborhood, to generate support
foi "W�'er< drinking beer and renewing atch and Participation in local crime
g programs. to strengthen neigh-
acquaintances and meeting new borhood anticrime spirit and 'to
neighbors," she said.
send a message to U►e' criminal com
d ne aim, Gerold said, Is to reduce across the count t hat neighborhoods
the fear of crime. It goes a long way, watching." are organized and
Ad said; for people to "get to know
their neighbors and to know that
th ey're not alone."
. ' Minneapolis Star and Tribune N
�.
C ommunity
rY
», Thursday
August'9/1984 1 X
Northwest zone pages inside
IL 2
'onl Night Out' just the of crime watch iceberg
By Paul Gustafson An exception Is Fridley, where po- While crime prevention officials of- "The concept seems to fit our com In the 12 -month period that ended In Coon Rapids, where officials of
Staff Writer lice officials say neighborhoods with ten see a marked decline of crime munity perfectly. Those neighborly June 30 there was an average of one the city and the Anoka- Hennepin
crime watch programs have less rates In areas with watch groups groups are always out there ... All burglary for every 45 homes in Frid- School District have started crime
From neighborly "clusters" in Edina than half the burglaries of neighbor- compared with adjacent areas with- we do is give them a little Identity, ley single - family -home neighbor- watch programs in three school at-
to block groups in Minneapolis, a hoods without them. out groups, Gerold said Minneapolis and information," he said. hoods with crime watch groups. In tendance areas, officials hope to
grass roots movement to fight crime has no recent statistics that show similar neighborhoods without watch avoid the complacency problem by
— aided by police, city and even Since it began in 1977 with a modest conclusively that neighborhood Swanson sold he hopes that statistics groups, the burglary rate was one organizing neighborhood groups that
community school officials — is pilot project in three neighborhoods, watch groups cut crime. will eventually show the effective- burglary for every 17 homes. tackle more than crime issues.
gaining momentum throughout the crime prevention In Minneapolis has ness of Edina's Neighbors Home
Twin Cities area. grown into a $500,000 program That proof come out of a nation- Watch program, which began in No- Fridley and Minneapolis must deal Coon Rapids officials are impressed
staffed by 14 full -time employees al study, which includes Minneapo- . vember 1982. But even without statis- with a problem that newer watch enough with their current crime
This week's National ;Night Out cam- who work with 500 crime watch lis, expected to be completed late tics, be said, the program has shown programs have yet to face: how to watch programs to consider a plan to
paign, which encouraged neighbors groups in 64 of the city's 84 neighbor- next year, she said. results by another measure: a de- maintain resident interest in watch develop a $140,000 citywide program
to turn on their porch lights and visit hoods. crease in residents' fear of crime groups once they've been formed. over five years, said Stewart and
to Lur for an hour, was only ahigh- Rather than organizing neighbor- where watch programs have begun. Police Chief Gerald Nelson.
outsid
ly visible manifestation of the drive. Program Director Lucy Gerold said hood groups for crime watches, Edi• "It would he nice if we could orga
i the logic of crime watching is sim- na offered existing "clusters" of rest- Fridley Public Safety Director Jim nize all 4,000 residential blocks, and "We don't have any hard, cold fig -
Out of the sight of cameras, thou- plc: watchful residents who commu• dents crime prevention tips, infor- Hill, whose city began its crime have them work on their own with- ures yet. There's been a reduction of
sands of residents in Minneapolis nicate with each other are taught mation and signs that warn burglars watch program a year after Minne out help, but they don't work that burglary in crime watch areas, but
and some area suburbs have been simple crime prevention measures, that neighbors watch out for each apolis, said he is satisfied that his way. They need stability and motiva- that trend has occurred throughout
quietly organizing neighborhood and receive Information on local other, said Police Chief Craig Swan- community's crime statistics prove tion, and that comes from a staff that the city. My feeling is there is bene-
crime watch groups to protect each crime trends that can reduce crime son. k with them," Ger- fit from the crime watch progra ms
other. rates, especially for burglaries. watch groups. old said. in that they bring neighborhoods to-
Like many suburban crime watch gether — getting to know your neigh.
Though united In purpose, Twin Cit- "I think there's a prevalent myth programs, Edina's is funded in part Seven years into a program aided by Hill said he worries that Fridley's bor is a big part of this program,"
!es crime watch programs vary that what's out there is a profession- by a private crime prevention fund. a two -year, $65,000 federal grant and crime watch program could suffer said Nelson.
greatly inform, funding, and sophis- at burglar who cases a place, and It also keeps costs to a minimum by three federally paid organizers, from its effectiveness. "Success is
tication. And while police officials comes in with fancy tools to break asking watch groups to pay for their Fridley has about 430 resident watch one of the main problems of continu- Staff members Peggy Koop and
believe they deter crime, most say in. But far more burglaries are own neighborhood crime watch groups in 33 neighborhoods, and bur- Ing the program. If you're successful, Ilgo Eglitis also contributed to this
they don't have the statistics yet to crimes of opportunity committed by signs, and by using cable TV to dis- glary rate statistics that Hill says 8re and burglaries drop off, people go on article.
back that assumption, amateurs who are looking for easy tribute crime information to them, fantastic." to other things," he said.
ways to break in," Gerold said. Swanson said.
I
i
i
1 J
f
Greg Tomatz
4818 Howe Lane
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 -
536 -8370 y
rim
.x `
Brooklyn Center Crime Prevention Fund
Announces
CRIME PREVENTION WEEK
September 16 -22, 1984
ACTIVITY DATE TIME LOCATION
-------------------------
Police Dept. Open House Sunday, 9 -16 -84 1:00 PM 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, MN
- 4:00 PM
Neighborhood Forum Tuesday, 9 -18 -84 7:00 PM Earle Brown Elementary School
5900 Humboldt Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, MN
Neighborhood Forum Wednesday, 9 -19 -84 7:00 PM Garden City Elementary School
3501 - 65th Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, MN
Neighborhood Forum Thursday, 9 -20 -84 7:00 PM Brooklyn Center High School
6500 Humboldt Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, MN
Walk -A -Thon Saturday, 9 -22 -84 8:30 AM Trailway System beginning at Central Park
- 1:00 PM (behind City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway)
(see reverse side for additional details)
THE PUBLIC IS WELCOME TO THESE ACTIVITIES. REFRESHMENTS WILL BE SERVED AT ALL EVENTS.
I - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- -------------- - - - - -- - - -I- ------ - - - - -- ------------------------------------------ - - - - -
ISerd check or money order to: I WALK- A -THON FOR CRIME PREVENTION I
CRIME PREVENTION FUND ! September 22, 1984 I'
I' 6301 Shingle, Creek Parkway ( 1
I Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 I *Yes, I would like to participate in the Walk -A -Thon. I
Please send me more details on registration J
IVES! I want to help. Enclosed is my contribution. I *Yes, I would like to sponsor someone in the I
((Contributions tax- deductible.) $5 $10 $15 $ ( Walk-A -Thon
I I l
INAME I NAME
—
I
(ADDRESS 'I ADDRESS I
IZIP PHONE I ZIP PHONE
i I
Return to: Crime Prevention Fund, 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy I
I ( Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------
POLICE DEPARTMENT OPEN HOUSE
Sunday, September 16, 1984 1:00 - 4:00 PM
City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota No admission
* * * * * ** *MEET CASEY JONES * * * * * * **
*2:00 PM - Canine Demonstration
*Department Tours
*Fingerprinting of children ; .... v
*Vehicles on display including Hennepin County Crime Lab, Fire ( n z
ZO Department rescue squad and boat, armored car, highway patrol »mom �y =' o
helicopter, North ambulance, police squad car, code enforcement a _,= C) c
truck
*Blood pressure checks 33 �= c
3 a n
*Displays by Alcohol, Tobacco & Tax Agency, DNR, BCA :� NN,y Z m
*Displays on drunk driving detection equipment, drugs, radar °_
OT 33? <
equipment, anatomically correct dolls used in child sexual abuse oZ 3 0
cases, bike safety, Operation ID, CPR, Crime Prevention Fund, :mK N
home lock systems 00 q)
*Clowns, balloons, refreshments oz
:og
NEIGHBORHOOD CRIME PREVENTION FORUMS
:sm m x� <� 3 O DO
Tuesday, September 18, 1984 Earle Brown Elementary School "$;_ °, x z c>
Wednesday, September 19, 1984 Garden City Elementary School x °_ "'mm ;
Cr
Thursday, September 20, 1984 Brooklyn Center High School K� ma0 22 2
m i N m N m 2
! : N O p m
7:00 PM - Refreshments 7:30 PM - Program z o
-- - - - - -- --
*Home and personal security - I M I
*How to form Neighborhood Watch groups
*Overview of the Police Department Ix. N I
*Lock demonstration 1 W=> a 0 d Ax
*Current crimes in Brooklyn Center I No C O O
*Question & answer period of Police Department personnel A "ac �O 'DO m
N [
: I °ice 0) -n aI
WALK- A -THON FOR CRIME PREVENTION L— _-- - - - -.J
Saturday, September 22, 1984 8:30 AM - 1:00 PM o I
Trailway System, starting in Central Park I_�� =D �= O m Z j
D O m3 - N _ Z
(behind City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway) o �;Q a �W� -
m H? n N (D O Z
ID V
*money is being raised to be used for rewards, payoffs to ° d I
informants, and "buy money" for use in identifying fencing M I
operations, burglary rings, narcotics rings and improving stolen :I I
goods recovery : r_ - -- -----�
*participants choose to walk between one and ten miles I o I
*refreshments provided at checkpoints along the trailway I o ON x
*following walk, participants served free ice cream :j a= a � z 0
*participants receive coupon to swim at the Civic Center pool for 1N° °Qa z W O 2 I
$0.50 on either 9 -22 -84 or 9 -23 -84 . Nw0 y o
*prizes awarded to participants 18 years old and younger, but :I � r c m 0 j
parents and other concerned citizens are welcome to walk :1 N < M I
*p articipants collectin $25.00 or more receive a free T-shirt;
:I I
9
L - J
those collecting $50.00 or more receive a free T -shirt and tote - - - - - - bag
*grand prize awarded to participant collecting the most money
*drawing of prizes donated by local businesses and civic
organizations held for participants
g d o 18 years old and younger
REGISTRATION: Children can register through their schools. If
you would like to register or sponsor a student, clip the coupon
on the opposite side and return to the Crime Prevention Fund.
Flyer printed for the Crime Prevention Fund courtesy of the PIZZA FACTORY
i
M & C t; 1. 84-09
August 17, 1984
FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: Review of Boulevard Tree Removal Policy
To the Honorable Mayor and City Council:
Attached please find a copy of a report giving the history of our boulevard tree
removal policy and an update on costs and some information about projected costs.
This review was requested by the Council as a part of citizen concerns that the
policy Brooklyn Center currently is operating under is out of step with neighboring
communities.
The policy question will turn on whether or not the City Council wants to set its
policy based on intercity comparison or inteacity comparison. If the Council
believes we should be more in step and in line with most of our neighboring
communities who pay 100% of boulevard tree removal costs, then the intercity
comparison would be valid. However, if you compare within the community and how we
have treated citizens in the past, then the current policy would prevail. Without
question if we compare our policy to most of our neighboring cities who are paying
100% while Brooklyn Center is paying 50% of the boulevard tree removal costs, we are
inconsistent. If you choose to compare our current policy to the way we have
treated other citizens within Brooklyn Center in previous years, then the current
G policy is justifiable. Good arguments can be made in favor of either staying with
the present policy or changing.
From the staff's point of view we believe it would be more consistent if the City
stayed with its current policy so as citizens who had to take down boulevard trees
last year and the years before are treated the same as citizens now having boulevard
trees removed or in the future. We believe there is merit in consistency over time
because the tax dollars spent on this program are totally within the limits of
Brooklyn Center and our policy does not affect citizens outside Brooklyn Center.
As always we stand ready to answer any further questions you may have.
Res etfully - tt d,
Gerald G. Spli r
City Manager
enc.
Gerald G. Splinter, City Winager
4 FRCM: Mike Dean, Intern
DATE: August 10, 1984
SUBJECT: Shade Tree Program P.eport
INTRODUCTION .
The Minnesota State Diseased Shade Tree Program began in 1975 with passage of
the Diseased Shade Tree Control Act. Over 27 million dollars was appropriated
-in 1975 and 1976 to the Department of Agriculture to administer the act and
reimburse municipalities for the removal of diseased shade trees.
During 1976, few municipalities (including Brooklyn Center) participated in
the program. This was because cities could be reimbursed only through matches
of special assessments to property owners for removal of trees - a procedure
which could cause cities to exceed levy limitations.
In 1977, the law changed to allow cities to assess tree removal through
"special levies ", and approved city programs.
To special assess for tree removal the City had to set up a Diseased Shade
Tree Program approved by the Department of Agriculture.
ljr sons who removed trees without going through the City Program could not
e�ceive reimbursement from the State.
MECHANI OF REIMBURSEMENT
The Diseased Shade Tree Control Act mandated the City to pay for at least half
the cost of tree removal from boulevards. Prior to 1977 property owners paid
100% of the cost of tree removal from boulevards.
State reimbursements could not exceed 50% of the cost of tree removal.
Reimbursements were made only for those trees removed through the City Program.
Property owners then payed the City cash when billed by the City, or they paid
'the City through a special assessment with interest.
The exact percentage of the cost of boulevard tree removal reimbursed by the
State went lower each year as funds depleted and as the number of diseased
elms decreased.
In the case of boulevard trees, property owners were given half the reimbursement
dollars.
By July 1982, reimbursement funds were depleted and the State Shade Tree
Program office was closed. Communities could choose at this point, whether or
'not to continue their diseased shade tree control programs with their own
funds.
A URR ENT POLICY
ter the State reimbursement program dissolved Brooklyn Center chose to continue
t r I(vyoi,jI Z'rrJjr l(TI ut lt'. C1`rlrl F'yp - r` ;o, btit <jr(lpjs�d th-
rl.•fr,rt•. .;} i;rs ;,r�lr -,m �<;rn;>i��t,l y ,
0 ojx�rt y (r, st.il l pay half the of boul(�vard t r oe removal alonq with a
5 adimnistrat ive fee lx2r tree removal agreement . The City's half comes from
the general fund.
Storm damaged trees are removed by the City at no charge. Owners are responsible
for removal of the stump.
The following cities pay the entire cost of diseased tree removal:*
Richfield Plymouth
Bloomington Robbinsdale
Golden Valley Crystal
St. Louis Park Fridley
Minnetonka Columbia Heights
Coon Rapids
Brooklyn Park charges a $10 administrative fee per agreement.
*This is only a partial listing of shade tree control program cities.
COSTS
Attached is a table showing the total number of trees (boulevard and other
trees) removed between 1977 and 1984; combined removal and reforestation costs
between 1977 and 1984; and the percent of removal reimbursement costs between
1977 and 1984. Reforestation is about 15% of the totals.
0 983 Boulevard Tree Removal Costs
Number of Boulevard Trees Removed: 84
Costs:
City $4,269.00
Owner (plus $15 per agreement) $4,2
TOTAL $8,538.00
Average cost per owner was $50.82
1984 Boulev Tree Removal Costs to Date '
Number of Boulevard Trees Removed: 30
Costs:
City $1,750.00
• Owner (plus $15 per agreement) $1,750.00
TOTAL $3
1985 Projected Boulevard T ree Removal Costs
Number of trees to be removed Approximately 100
Costs: 100 trees at $100 each = $10,000
ESTIMATE OF NUMBER OF DISEASED
OR LIKELY DISEASED TREES LEFT ON THE BOULEVARDS
actual count of boulevard trees has ever been taken. "Armchair" counts,
14plowever, show the City started with about. 3,650 boulevard elms.
Approximately 1,200 - 1,600 boulevard elms remain on the boulevards. At an
�w�r.,� ;� �,;�' f ';�Ir;�i Ir r i r�� i;�� !��' � �•�r� "': "ct to I >,ay $120
Ior if.,,iIC'1 -Jr(I trr�r� rt v)vcil OvC,t t I if I<< ' %f (A'`�'.U:�_.
rrjmtr�r of trees r(,rrx)ved fx-r yr�ar varies depending on how the disease
�5f read!; during the year.
Soren say rainy remaining elms are resistant to the disease. But this is not
known for sure.
`IVJ'AI, NUi•if:1:I± OF TPE S KI-:MOVL•'D;
COMBINI D Alit) PEIMOVAL COSTS; A14D
PENCENTAGE OF S`IAI'f : FOR fd- ;MOVIIL
NUMBER OF
YEAR TREES REM CO % REIMBURSEMENT
1977 669 $51,815 40$
1978 712 $52,457 45
1979 487 $44,200 41$
1980 478 $55,310 25%
1981 583 $78,091 12�%
19822 397 $41,000• 0%
1983 288 $29,000 0%
1984 30 $ 3,500 0%
1 Reforestation accounts for about 15% of the 1977 1981 totals
2 Removal costs only '
3 Boulevard elms only to date
i; '
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT
FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota and the County of
Hennepin have in effect a joint cooperation agreement, County Contract No.
90434, for the purpose of the United States Department of Housing & Urban
Development Community Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, the City and the County wish to terminate the agreement
and execute a new joint cooperation agreement, County Contract No. 10370:
Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that the current joint cooperation agreement between the City
and the County, County Contract No. 90434 be terminated effective September 30,
1984 and a new joint cooperation agreement between the City and the County,
County Contract No. 10370, be executed effective October 1,1984, and that
the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to enter into the agreement
on behalf of the City.
Date Mayor
.
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Contract No.
JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," and the
CITY OF , hereinafter referred to as "COOPERA-
TING UNIT," said parties to Ms Agreement each being governmental uni
of the State of Minnesota, and is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 471.59;
WITNESSETH;
In consideration_of the mutual covenants and promises contained
in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and
conditions.
I. DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this Agreement, the terms defined in this
section have the meanings given them:
A. "The Act" means the Housing and Community Development Act of
1974, Title I, of Public Law 93 -383, as amended (42 USC 5301
et�. seq. ).
B. eR" lations" means the rules and regulations promulgated
pursuant to the Act, including but not limited to 24 CFR Part
570.
C. "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
D. "Cooperating Unit" means any city or town in Hennepin County
which has entered into a cooperation agreement which is identical
to this Agreement, as well as Hennepin County which is a party to
each Agreement.
E. "Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" means the
document bearing that title and submitted to HUD for authori-
zation to expend the entitlement amount and which is developed by
the COUNTY in conjunction with COOPERATING UNITS as part of the
Community Development Block Grant Program.
F. "Planning Area" means one of the various regions of Hennepin
County as defined in the Citizen Participation adopted for
purposes of the Act by County by Resolution.
The definitions contained in 42 USC 5302 of the Act and 24 CFR
570.3 of the Regulations are incorporated herein by reference and made a
part hereof.
II. PURPOSE
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY have determined that it is desirable
and in the interests of their citizens that COUNTY qualify as an Urban
County within the provisions of_the Act. This Agreement contemplates that
identical agreements will be executed between COUNTY and any city or town
in Hennepin County which does not qualify as a metropolitan city under the
Act in such number as will enable COUNTY to so qualify as an Urban County.
under the Act.
The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize COUNTY and COOP-
ERATING UNIT to cooperate in undertaking, or assisting in undertaking,
community renewal and lower income housing activities, specifically urban
renewal and publicly assisted housing and authorizes COUNTY to carry out
these and other eligible activities which will be funded from annual
Community Development Block Grants from Fiscal Years 1985, 1986 and 1987.
III. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The term of this Agreement is for a period commencing on the
effective date of October 1, 1984, and terminating no sooner than the end
of program year thirteen (XIII) covered by the Statement of Objectives and
the Projected Use of Funds for the basic grant amount approved by HUD
subsequent to the effective date. This Agreement is extended automatic -
ally for each subsequent three year program period unless written notice
of termination to be effective at the end of the three year program period
is given by COOPERATING UNIT to COUNTY following the same schedule as the
notification of opportunity to be excluded. COUNTY shall provide written
notification to COOPERATING UNIT of the opportunity to be excluded and
terminate this Agreement.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this
Agreement shall be terminated at the end of the three year program period
during which HUD withdraws its designation of COUNTY as an Urban County
under the Act.
This Agreement shall be executed by the appropriate officers of
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY pursuant to authority granted them by their
respective governing bodies, and a copy of the authorizing resolution and
executed Agreement shall be filed promptly by the COOPERATING UNIT in the
office of the Hennepin County Administrator, and in no event shall the
Agreement be filed later than September 14, 1984.
IV. SCOPE OF ACTIVITIES
COOPERATING UNIT agrees that awarded grant funds will be used to
undertake and carry out within the terms of this Agreement certain
projects involving one or more of the essential activities eligible for
funding under the Act. COUNTY agrees and will assist COOPERATING UNIT in
the undertaking of such essential activities by providing the services
specified in this Agreement.
2
A. COOPERATING UNIT further specifically agrees as follows:
1. COOPERATING UNIT will in accord with•a COUNTY established
schedule parepare and provide to COUNTY, in a prescribed
form, an annual request for the use "of Community Development
Block Grant Funds consistent with program regulations and
Urban Hennepin County program objectives."
2. COOPERATING UNIT will use all funds received pursuant to the
Agreement for each annual program within eighteen (18) months
of the approval by HUD of the basic grant amount. Expenditure
period extensions shall not be permitted, except in cases
where the funded activity has been initiated and /or subject
of a contract to execute between the COOPERATING UNIT and a
vendor.
3. COOPERATING UNITS will take actions necessary to accomplish
the community development program and housing assistance
goals as contained in the Urban Hennepin County Housing
Assistance Plan.
4. COOPERATING UNIT will ensure that all programs and /or
activities funded in part or in full by grant funds received
pursuant to this agreement will be undertaken affirmatively
with regard to fair housing, employment and business opportu-
nities for minorities and women. It will in implementing all
programs and /or activities funded by the basic grant amount
comply with all applicable federal and Minnesota Laws,
statues, rules and regulations with regard to civil rights,
affirmative action and equal employment opportunities.
5. COOPERATING UNIT will participate in the citizen participa-
tion process as established in the Urban Hennepin County
Citizen Participation Plan.
B. COUNTY further specifically agrees as follows:
1. COUNTY shall prepare and submit to HUD and appropriate
reviewing agencies on an annual basis all plans, statements
and program documents necessary for receipt of a basic grant
amount under the Act.
2. COUNTY shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible,
technical assistance and coordinating services to COOPERATING
UNIT in the preparation and submission of the request for
funding.
3. COUNTY shall provide ongoing technical assistance to COOPERA-
TING UNIT to aid COUNTY in fulfilling its responsibility to
HUD for accomplishment of the community development program
and housing assistance goals. The parties mutually agree to
cooperate fully in the preparation of the Statement of
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds to qualify for receipt
of the basic grant amount.
3
4. COUNTY shall upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT agree
to administer local housing rehabilitation grant programs
funded pursuant to the Agreement provided that COUNTY shall
receive reimbursement for costs associated with operating
local housing rehabilitation programs, the amount of which
shall be established on an annual basis.
5. COUNTY shall, as necessary for clarification and coordination
of program administration, develop and implement Administra-
tive Rules consistent with the Act, Regulations and HUD
administrative directives.
The parties mutually agree to comply with all applicable
requirements of the Act and the Regulations and other relevant Federal
and /or Minnesota statutes or regulations in the use of basic grant
amounts. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to lessen or abrogate
COUNTY's responsibility to assume all obligations of an applicant under
the Act, including the development of applications pursuant to 24 CFR
570.300 et.seq•
Y. ALLOCATION OF BASIC GRANT AMOUNTS
Basic grant amounts received by the COUNTY under the Act shall be
allocated as follows:
A. COUNTY shall retain ten percent (10 %) of the total basic grant
amount for the undertaking of eligible activities.
B. The balance of the basic grant amount shall be apportioned by
COUNTY to COOPERATING UNITS in accordance with the following
formula for the purpose of allowing the COOPERATING UNITS to make
requests for the use of funds so apportioned. The allocation is
for planning purposes only and is not a guarantee of funding.
Each COOPERATING UNIT shall use as a target for planning purposes
an amount which bears the same ratio to the balance of the basic grant
amount as the average of the ratios between:
1. The population of COOPERATING UNIT and the population of all
COOPERATING UNITS.
20 The extent of poverty in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of
poverty in all COOPERATING UNITS.
3. The extent of housing overcrowded by units in COOPERATING UNIT
and the extent of housing overcrowded by units in all COOPERATING
UNITS.
4. In determining the average of the above ratios, the ratio
involving the extent of poverty shall be counted twice.
It is the intent of this paragraph that said planning allocation
utilize the same basic elements for allocation.of funds as are set forth
in 42 CFR 507.4. The COUNTY shall develop these ratios based upon
data to be furnished by HUD. The COUNTY assumes no duty to gather such
data independently and assumes no liability for any errors in the data
furnished by HUD.
4
i
In the event that any COOPERATING UNIT cannot commit, expend,
does not apply or cannot qualify for a community development block grant,
or a portion thereof, COUNTY will reallocate the unexpended or unallocated
grant funds to a Countywide Discretionary account. The reallocation will
include funds pursuant to Article IV paragraph A. 2. of this Agreement.
COUNTY will retain ten (10) percent of all funds placed in the Countywide
Discretionary Account to help defray the administrative costs associated
with planning and administering the Countywide Discretionary reallocation
process.
COUNTY will inform each COOPERATING UNIT of the Countywide
Discretionary account balance and will provide the opportunity to COOPERA-
TING UNIT to make request for use of all or a portion of the funds.
VI. FINANCIAL MATTERS
Reimbursement to the COOPERATING UNIT for expenditures for the
implementation of activities funded under the Act shall be made upon
receipt by the COUNTY of Summary of Project Disbursement form and Hennepin
County Warrant Request, and supporting documentation.
All funds received by COUNTY under the Act as reimbursement for
payment to COOPERATING UNITS for expenditure of local funds for activities
funded under the Act shall be deposited in the County Treasury.
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall maintain financial and other
records and accounts in accordance with requirements of the Act and
Regulations. Such records and accounts will be in such form as to permit
reports required of the COUNTY to be prepared therefrom and to permit the
tracing of grant funds and program income to final expenditure.
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree to make available all records
and accounts with respect to matters covered by this Agreement at all
reasonable times to their respective personnel and duly authorized federal
officials. Such records shall be retained as provided bylaw, but in no
event for a period of less than three years from the last receipt of
program income resulting from activity implementation. COUNTY shall
perform all audits of the basic grant amount and resulting program income
as required under the Act and Regulations. Program income derived from
activities funded in total or part from the basic grant amount received by
COOPERATING UNIT shall be returned to COUNTY for inclusion in the
Countywide Discretionary Account, except that income generated from
approved revolving account activities dependent on the return of said
income, shall remain with the activity.
a
5
COOPERATING UNIT, having signed this Agreement, and the Hennepin
County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on
19 , and pursuant to such approval and the proper
County o icia having signed this Agreement, the parties hereto agree to
be bound by the provisions herein set forth.
Upon proper execution, this COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA
Agreement will be legally
valid and binding. By:
Chairman of its County goard
And:
County Administrator
Assistant County Attorney
Date: ATTEST:
Deputy County Auditor
APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: CITY OF:
BY:
Its
Assistant County Attorney
Date: And:
Its
CITY MUST CHECK ONE:
The City is organized pursuant
to:
Plan 7an E — arter
Member_ introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR FURNISHING AND DELIVERY
OF BLEACHERS AND PRESS BOX AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota as follows:
1. The specifications for furnishing and delivery of bleachers
as prepared by the City's Parks and Recreation Director are
hereby approved and ordered filed with the City Clerk.
2. The Clerk shall advertise for bias for such equipment by
publication at least once in the official newspaper, the
date of first publication not less than ten days prior to
the date of receipt of bids. Said notice shall state that
no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed and
accompanied by a cash deposit, bid bond, cashier's check
or certified check payable to the City Clerk in an amount
of .not less than five per cent (5%) of the accompanying
bid.
3. Bid date is set for Thursday, September 13, 1984, at 11:00 a.m.
4. The.City Manager shall be authorized to open and tabulate
the bids.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favoer thereof:
and the following against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
C T TY OF BROOKLYN CT.-;N'I'! R
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
PROVISIONS & SPECIFICATIONS FOR
BLEACHERS AND PRESS B OX
1. GENERAL
All bids must be received at the office of the City Clerk on or before
11:00 a.m., Thursday, September 13, 1984, and shall be submitted on the
enclosed proposal form in a sealed envelope, plainly marked "Bid for
Bleachers and Press Box ".
Each bid shall be accompanied by a certified check or bidder's bond,
payable to the City Clerk, in the amount of at least five per cent (5%)
of the total amount of the bid.
It is also understood that the City Council reserves the right to reject
any or all bids, to waiver informalities and to award the contract to the
best interests of the City.
The bleachers proposed and delivered to the City of Brooklyn Center shall
be complete in every respect and ready for installation in accordance with
these specifications.
Manufacturer's reference, trade name, model number, brand or description
mentioned in this proposal are descriptive but not restrictive and used
only to indicate type and standard of material or equipment desired. All
equipment bid shall be as specified or approved equal.
The bidder must give assurance to the City of Brooklyn Center in regard
to patent infringements and in case of suits against the City by other
parties. He must defray all cost in connection with such a suit and save
the City harmless in all actions.
Complete specifications and instructions for installation of equipment
shall accompany the bid.
2. GUARANTEE
The bidder shall guarantee this equipment as to the specified capacity and
satisfactory performance and to be free of defects in the design, material, and
workmanship. All defective parts and material shall be replaced free of
cost to the City of Brooklyn Center, including labor for a period of one
year from date of delivery.
3. DELIVERY DATE
The successful bidder shall schedule delivery to the City of Brooklyn
Center for the earliest date possible.
4. AWARD
Award of contract by the City of Brooklyn Center will be based on, but
not necessarily limited to the factors of price, delivery date, parts
and service; as well as analysis and comparison of specifications and
performance.
P ROPOSA L
BL EACI(I',RS AND PItESS�'�OX
To: City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN., 55430
Gentlemen:
We propose to furnish and deliver bleachers /pressbox according to the
.specifications at the bid price noted on the "Proposal" form.
We agree to deliver /install the bleachers /pressbox within days
after acceptance of bid. In guarantee of'sincerity of purpose in
entering this bid, the undersigned encloses a certified check or
bidder's bond in the amount of five percent, (5 %), of the total amount
bid, made payable to the City of Brooklyn Center, which it is agreed
will be forfeited to the City in the event that said proposal is
accepted and said contract is not executed as herein stipulated.
ALTERNATE I Bleachers (delivered only) $
ALTERNATE I -A Bleachers delivered and assembled on site
ALTERNATE II Pressbox (delivered only) $
I L' ALTERNATE II -A Pressbox (delivered and installed on 45' bleacher)
i
Signed
Firm Name
Address
DATE
Bid opening:'
Time:
ate:
AMNERAL SPECIFICATIONS
It is the intent of these specifications that the City of Brooklyn
Center shall purchase two (2) ten -row x 21' non elevated bleachers
and one (1) ten row x 45' non elevated bleacher with one (1) 12' x 8' x
7' press box attached to the 45' bleacher.
Equipment bid shall be new, currently advertised standard production
model incorporating all latest changes and features. Equipment fur-
nished shall comply with all requirements as set by the Uniform Buil-
ding Code and shall conform with all Minnesota State Codes.
f .
ALTERNATE I - BLEACHERS
Material
T
1 components shall be structural aluminum alloy 6061 -.
P s Y
T6 with mill finish. Seats and footboards shall be made up of aluminum
alloy 6063 -T6 with clear anodized finish conforming to the Aluminum
Association Architectural Class II minimum specification, AA- MIOC22A31.
All plank ends shall be covered with factory installed aluminum end
caps. Other aluminum components shall be made of alloy 6063 -T6. Nuts,
bolts, and washers shall be cadmium plated steel.
Load Design
Bleachers shall be designed to support a uniformly distributed live
load of not less than 120 pounds per square foot of gross horizontal
projection of the bleachers. Bleachers shall be designed to 'resist,
th or without live load, a horizontal wind load of 30 pounds per
square foot of gross verticle projection /. Bleachers shall.also be
designed to resist sway loads of 24 pounds per linear foot parallel
to seat planks, and 10 pounds per linear foot perpendicular to seat
Sa nks. Guardrails shall be designed to resist a verticle load of
100 pounds per linear foot and a horizontal load of 50 pounds per
linear foot.
Dimensions
Uprights or risers: 2 7/8" O.D. tube, .078" wall thickness or equal.
Horizontal braces and footrest supports: 3, x 2 7/8 channel, .125
wall thickness or equal.
Cross braces and diagonals: 2 1/4" x 7/8 . 078 wall thickness or
equal.
Seats and footrests: 2" x 10" nominal extruded aluminum 6063 -T6 alloy,
wall thickness .078 ".
I NTERNATE II - PRESS BOX
The press box shall be 12'L x 8'W x 7'H. The press box shall be wired
for 100 amp service, and shall contain three wall outlets and four
SS240 lights.
Bidder shall be responsible for design of the press box and shall
submit design specifications at the time of bidding.
Mcmher introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR EVERGREEN PARK /AREA IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1984 -07, PHASE II (CONTRACT 1984 -I)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 84 -65 adopted by the Council on
the 23rd day of April, 1984, plans and specifications have been prepared for
Improvement Project No. 1984 -07, Phase II and such plans and specifications have
been presented to the Council for approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota:
1. The plans and specifications for the following improvement as
prepared by the City's consultant, Orr- Schelen- Mayeron &Associates,
Inc. are approved and ordered filed with the City Clerk:
EVERGREEN PARK /AREA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1984 -07, PHASE II
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least
twice in the official newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin
an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement
under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
,- shall appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date for
receipt of bids, and specify the work to be done, state that said
bids will be received by the City Clerk until 11:00 -A.M. on September
13, 1984, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council
Chambers at City Hall by the City Clerk and City Engineer,, will
then be tabulated and will be considered by the City Council at
7:00 P.M. on September 24, 1984, in the Council Chambers, and that
no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City
Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond,
or certified check payable to the City for 5 percent of the amount
of such bid.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the followin g g voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was. declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY
ri of BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
B ROO K L Y Nlr TELEPHONE 561 -5440
R ® ENT EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE
1 ` j 911
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 17, 1984
RE: Phase II Development of Evergreen Park /Area
As the first phase of the Evergreen Park /Area nears completion, the
City's consultant has completed plans and specifications for completion
of the second phase of the proposed area improvements. Included in
the second phase are:
Field and trail lighting
Field irrigation system
Well house construction over existing Well No. 4
Area landscaping
As outlined in the Engineer's Report of April 23, 1984, the.estimated
cost of this phase of the improvement is $203,670,.while a review of
costs to date indicates that the project is approximately $53,120
under the budgeted amount.
Respectfully submitted,
SK; jn ;�1
-56makag Nam
sSe,uiY�e r introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DELIVERY UNDER CONTRACT 1984 -D
(LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1983 -09, PHASE II)
WHEREAS, pursuant to written Contract 1984 -D signed with the City
of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Flaherty Equipment Company has satisfactorily
supplied equipment specified under the following improvement in accordance
with said contract:
LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1983 -09, PHASE II
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The equipment supplied under said contract is accepted and approved
as outlined below:
As Approved Final Amount
Original Award $ 26,989.00 $ 26,936.25
2. The value of the contract is less than the original amount by
$52.75 reflecting credit given for fuel allowance.
3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract,
taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be
paid for said improvement under said contract shall be $26,936.25.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken 'thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Mrzml�er introduced the fol.lowinfj rf- -sol_ution acid
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1984 -E
(WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1984 -02 AND WATER SERVICE
REPAIR PROJECT NO. 1984 -06)
WHEREAS, pursuant to written Contract 1984 -E signed with the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, Hayes Contractors, Inc. has satisfactorily completed
the following improvements in accordance with said contract:
WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1984 -02
WATER SERVICE REPAIR PROJECT NO. 1984 -06
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The work completed under said contract is accepted and approved
according to the following schedule:
Water Main Improvement Project No. 1984 -02
As Approved Final Amount
Original Contract $ 72,247.75 $ 76,061.89
�t
Water Service Repair Project No. 1984 -06
Original Contract $ 77,681.00 $ 82,638.35
2. The value of work performed is more than the original contract
amount by $8771.49 due to a general underestimation of planned
quantities.
3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said contract,
taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be
paid for said improvement under said contract shall be $158,700.24.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota that:
1. There is hereby appropriated the sum of $5,453.08 for additional
costs incurred under Project No. 1982 -06, said appropriation to
be financed by the Public Utility Fund.
Date Mayor
A �
ATTEST:
Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
i
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
m -,
y
CITY 6301 ;. HiNGLE CRECK PARKWAY
OF
BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
BROOKLYN TELEPHONE 561 -5440
C ENTER EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE
911
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 16, 1984
RE: Review of Contract Costs - Contract 1984 -E (Water Main Improvement
Project No. 1984 -02 and Water Service Repair Project No. 1984 -06)
Attached is a resolution accepting work completed in the installation of water
main along Lee, Major, and 70th Avenues (Project No. 1984 -02) and water service
repairs within the south Industrial Park (Project No. 1984 -06). As outlined in
the resolution, both projects experienced cost overruns. A brief summary of
the conditions contributing to the overruns follows:
Project No. 1984 -02
Project overrun - $3,814.14
Primary source of overrun quantity - office miscalculation of sodding necessary
to restore boulevards - $2,975.70
Secondary source of overrun quantity - Addition of pavement restoration to correct
substandard pavement condition on 70th
Avenue - $588.49
Miscellaneous quantity overruns - $249.95
TOTAL - $3,814.14 (or 5.30 of project contract cost)
i
Project No. 1984 -06
Project overrun $4,957.35
Source of overrun - 1969 as -built drawings did not accurately locate all existing
service extensions. As a result, repeated excavations were
necessary to locate the mains. Work involved in the excavation
process included dewatering, additional pavement repair /removal
and additional miscellaneous surface (concrete sidewalk, median,
curb, sod, etc.) restoration.
August. 10, J98-1 - G.G. SI)l ititcr
Page 2
Note #1 - Overrun equals 60 of project contract cost
Note #2 - The purpose of this project was to avoid individual failure of the service
extensions resulting from improper installation. During the course of
the project we found 5 extensions which were leaking and on the verge
of failure. Examination of the other 19 extensions which were either
abandoned or corrected showed a clear indication of potential failure.
Accordingly, it is our opinion that this was a very timely and cost-
effective project.
Note #3 - The accompanying resolution provides for the appropriation of an
additional $5,453.08 from the Public Utility Fund to finance all costs
(including Engineering and Administrative fees) related to Project
No. 1984 -06.
Respectfully submitted,
SK: jn
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED.AND PROVIDING FOR
HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.
1984 -02 (WATER MAIN INSTALLATION ON LEE, MAJOR, AND 70TH
AVENUES)
WHEREAS, construction of Improvement Project No. 1984 -02 is complete
and the tabulated costs are:
Contract $ 76,061.89
Engineering
Consultant 287.98
City 6,845.57
Administration 760.62
Interest 1,655.68
Legal and Bonding 760.62
TOTAL $ 86,372.36
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has notified the City Council that a proposed
assessment roll has been prepared and filed in his office for public inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota:
1. The portion of cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is
hereby declared to be $31,172.36 and the portion of the cost to
be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be
$55,200.00.
2. Lot 1, Block 1 Elnicky's Addition is benefited by said improvement
and is subject to a hookup charge at such time that said property is
connected to the water main. Said hookup charge shall be determined
by the City Council at the time a petition requesting said connection
is received, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes
444.
i
3. A hearing shall be held on the 24th days of September, 1984, in the
City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference
to such assessment.
4. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the
notice the total cost of the_ improvement.
YESOLU`I'ION NO.
5. The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of
each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks
prior to the hearing.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
f � _
CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY
f OF
B
��T �T BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
k L l�l
TELEPHONE 561 -5440
{
ENTE EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE
911
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 17, 1984
RE: Project Costs /Special Assessments for Lde, Major, and 70th Avenues
Water Main Improvement Project No. 1984 -02
The referenced project has been completed and accepted by the City Council, and
the following information is submitted to assist in the review of the project
costs and assessment amounts.
As Estimated As Assessed /Financed
Construction Cost $ 78,210.00 $ 76,061.89 -
'!` • Engineering Cost
Consultant 0.00 287.98
City 7,040.00 6,845.57
Administrative Cost 780.00 760.62
Legal Cost 780.00 760.62
Interest 10,420.00 . 1;655:68
TOTAL $ 97,230.00 $ 86,372.36
City Share $ 29,089.19 $ 31,172.36
Assessable Share 68,140.81 55,200.00
Assessable Rates
Single Family Rate $2,400.00 /Each $2,400.00 /Each
Commercial/ Industrial Frontage $24.57/LF N/A
Commercial /Industrial Area $7.62/100 SF N/A
Assessment Period 20 Years 20 Years
"74C sem&kmf Mau
August 17, 1084 - G.G. Sp.] intcr
Page 2
An analysis of the "cost sharing" for this project shows the City will pay
$2,083.17 more than reported at the improvement hearing, while the assessment
share is $12,940.81 less than reported. The reduction in assessed amount is
attributed to the result of the deletion of the Willow Lane Apartments from the
assessment roll.
Staff recommends such deletion from the roll at this time because the complex
is presently served by water main in Brooklyn Boulevard, and the site cannot
accommodate further expansion unless existing,structures are removed. Staff
contends, and the owner acknowledges, that such future development may occur
and as a result, connection to the newly constructed main could be feasible.
Accordingly, staff and the owner agree that it-would be advisable to charge a
hookup charge under Minnesota Statutes, Section 444 at such time the owner petitions
for connection to the system. The accompanying resolution provides that such
charge be made. The balance of the proposed assessment roll is identical to that
proposed at the improvement hearing (23 residences at the established 1984 rate
of $2,400 per residence).
Respectfully submitted,
a .
SK:j YYI
Member introduced the following resolution acid
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CANCELLING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ON HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota is the owner of the property described
below and that said property is utilized as highway right of way:
Tract G, Registered Land Survey No. 1377
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.071, Subdivision 2, hold
that assessments levied against highway right of way are invalid;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that the County Auditor is authorized and directed
to cancel from the Hennepin County Tax Rolls the following special assessment
(including all interest and penalties) for curb and gutter levied against the
referenced property:
LEVY 7427 - CURB & GUTTER PROJECT 1978 -28
Delinquent Annual Installments
Property I.D. No. Original Amount 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984
35- 119 -21 -31 -0016 $ 53.44 $ 8.95 $ 7.60 $ 7.32 $ 7.03 $ 6.75
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Special Assessment Fund 58 -201 be reimbursed
in the amount of $53.44 for the referenced Special Assessment cancellation, said
amount to be appropriated from the City's Municipal State Aid Fund Balance No. 2600.
l
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK P ARKk%1 AY
OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
._ 13ROOKLYN
LE
TE PHONE 561-5440
ENTER
EMERGENCY - .POLICE -FIRE
811
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 16, 1984
RE: Cancellation of Special Assessment Against Highway Right of Way
In 1979 the City Council levied special assessments against those properties
benefited by the construction of concrete curb and gutter on James Circle.
Included in the levy was highway right of way owned by the Minnesota Department
of Transportation (MN /DOT). A review of departmental records shows that the
property was acquired by MN /DOT in June, 1979, but that state and county paper -
work did not clear until after the levy certification in September, 1979.
Due to the time lag involved, the tax statement for the property included the
special assessment levy. However Minnesota Statutes Section on 429.0.7 Subdivision
. 1, b i sio n
2 hold that such
a levy was .invalid since the property had been reviousl
p y
Ii
purchased for highway right of way. Accordingly, a resolution cancelling the
assessment (in the amount of $53.44) and reimbursing the related bond account
(through appropriation from the City's local hmicip.al State Aid Fund Balance
No. 2600) is attached for City Council consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
SK: j n
Y
" ?!c
1�+
Member_ introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND PROVIDING FOR
HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.
1984 -03 (HALIFAX AVENUE AND 70TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT)
WHEREAS, construction of Improvement Project No. 1984 -03 is complet
and the tabulated costs are:
Contract $ 96,711.53
Engineering
Consultant 1,984.52
City 8,704.04
Administration 967.12
Interest 1,710.98
Legal and Bonding 546.49
Other .(Sprinkler Repair)
527.00
TOTAL $111,151.68
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has notified the City Council that a proposed
assessment roll has been prepared and filed in his office for public inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota:
1. The portion of cost of Improvement Project No. 1984 -03 to be paid
by the City is hereby declared to be m $47,801.84 and the portion of
the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is
declared to be $63,349.84.
2. A hearing shall be held on the 24th day of September 24, 1984, in
the City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment
and at such time and place all persons owning property affected
by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with
reference to such assessment.
3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the
notice the total cost of the improvement.
4. The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of
each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two
weeks prior to the hearing.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
I233SOLli'1'I(�t1 C1C�.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
ICI
CITY 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY
OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
BR O O K L Y N TELEPHONE 561 -5440
ENTE
EMERGENCY - POLICE _ FIRE
911
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 17, 1984
RE: Project Costs /Special Assessments for Halifax Avenue and 70th Avenue
Street Improvement Project No. 1984 -03
The referenced project has been completed and accepted by the City Council, and the
following information is submitted to assist in the review of the project costs
and assessment amounts.
As Estimated As Completed
Construction Cost $ 100,180.00 $ 96,711.53
Engineering Cost
City 9,030.00 8,704.04
Consultant 0.00 1,984.52
Administrative Cost 990.00 967.12
Legal Cost 610.00 546.49
Interest 8,160.00 1,710.98
.Other (Sprinkler Repair) .... . 0.00 527.00
TOTAL $ 118,970.00 $ 111,151.68
City Share $ 42,760.00 $ 47,801.84
Assessable Amount $ 76,210.00 $ 63,349.84
Assessment Period 10 Years 10 Years
A comparison of the estimated and actual project costs shows that the work was
completed at a cost of $7,818.32 less than reported at the improvement hearing.
Further comparisons of estimated and actual costs shows that the City's share is
$5,040 higher than previously estimated while the benefited property's share
(St. Alphonsus Catholic Church) is $12,860 lower than estimated.
?fie so«ctt mace �� ,,
Atigia-It :1.7, 1'.x84 - G.G. ` pl iaxtei
Page 2
'The increased City share is due to a combination of factors, i.e.:
construction costs were increased by approximately $4,500 over the
original estimate due to (1) an unbalanced bid for the area landscaping
the Contractor laced approximately 2 000 of his
( P PP Y profit in this item) $ � P
and (2) o the 2 500 cost difference between intersection paving as
$ P g
originally proposed, and the final design which incorporated the traffic
circle, adjacent concrete island and related landscaping.
- the increase in overhead costs related to the referenced work resulted
to approximately $500.
A review of the cost savings experienced by St. Alphonsus Church shows that
overestimation of a uantities and costs related to driveway reconstruction resulted
in a savings of $6,700. In addition, approximately $6,500 in interest was saved
because of project timing.
Respectfully submitted,
SK:,jn �.y�
Q"
Member t1w. followi nU 'resolution tend
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND PROVIDING FOR
HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.
1984 -04 (SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY TURN LANE CONSTRUCTION)
WHEREAS, Improvement Project No. 1984 -04 has been completed and the
final project costs are tabulated as follows:
Contract $ 34,209.66
Engineering
Consultant 394.68
City 3,078.87
Administration 342.10
Interest 1,133.23
Legal and Bonding 342.10
TOTAL $ 39,500.64
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has notified the City Council that a proposed
assessment roll has been prepared and filed in his office for public inspection:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota:
l
1. The portion of the cost of Improvement Project No. 1984 -04 prepaid
by benefited property owners is acknowledged to be $8,275.00, and
the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property
owners is declared to be $31,225.64.
2. A hearing shall be held on the 24 th day of September, 1984 in
in the City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment
and at such time and place all persons owning property affected
by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard
with reference to such assessment.
3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the hearing on
the proposed assessment to be published once in the official news-
paper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state
in the notice the total cost of the improvement.
4. The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner
of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two
weeks prior to the hearing.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Id-,SOLUTION 140.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
s
CITY 63 01 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY
OF
p^ ^ KY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
ROO TELEPHONE 561 -5440
C ENTE R
}� EMERGENCY - POLICE -FIRE
�.� 911
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 16, 1984
RE: Project Costs /Special Assessments for Shingle Creek Parkway Turn Lane
Improvement Project No. 1984 -04
The referenced project has been completed and accepted by the City Council, and
the following information is submitted to assist in the review of the project
costs and assessment amounts.
As Estimated As Assessed
Construction Cost $ 40,600.00 $ 34,209.66
Engineering Cost
Consultant 0.00 394.68
City 3,650.00 3,078.87
Administrative Cost 400.00 342.10
Legal Cost 400.00 342.10
Interest 4,870.00 1,133.23
TOTAL $ 49,920.00 $ 39,500.64
Assessment Period 15 Years 15 Years
Please note that while the accompanying resolution outlines the actual costs listed
above, it also acknowledges prepayment of $8,275.00 by the developer, resulting
in an assessment amount of $31,225.64.
t
Respectfully submitted,
SK: jnr
74 —5v' � maw .,
Mc.inber introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS
FOR DISEASED SHADE TREE REMOVAL COSTS; FOR PUBLIC UTILITY
HOOKUP CHARGES; FOR DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY ACCOUNTS;
DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL ACCOUNTS; AND NUISANCE ABATEMENT COSTS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 24th day of September, 1984, in
the City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessments
for the following charges:
Diseased Shade Tree Removal Costs
Public Utility Hookups
Delinquent Public Utility Accounts
Delinquent Weed Destruction Accounts
and Nuisance Abatement Costs
at such time and place all persons owning property to be assessed
for such charges will be given an opportunity to be heard with
reference to such assessments.
2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall
:forthwith prepare assessment rolls for the above charges, and
shall keep them on file and open to inspection by any interested
persons. -
3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessments to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing.
4. The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner
of each parcel described in such assessment rolls not less than two
weeks prior to the hearing.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk -
RESOLUTION NO.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
,W
i
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PURCHASE OF A MICROPROCESSOR FOR USE
BY THE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE DIVISION
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, that:
1. The transfer of $5,220 from the I Federal Revenue Sharing Fund
(Fund No. 25) to the Vehicle Maintenance Division (Division
43) of the General Fund (Fund No. 01) is hereby approved.
2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to purchase a microprocessor
and appurtenances for installation at the City Garage at a cost
of $5,220.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
f
4
r
CITY 6301 aF�1 OGLE CREEK PARKWAY
of BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
YMYN
TELEPHONE 561 - 5440
x N EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE
.,
1- 911
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM. Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: August 16, 1984
RE: Justification for Purchase of Microcomputer and Use of EDP Vehicle
Management Program at City Garage
The following is submitted as supplementary information to my July 30, 1984 memo
(copy attached) and in response to the City Council's request for additional -
information regarding the value of the "Vehicle Management System".
A. Existing Vehicle Maintenance Cost Information System
To -date, Brooklyn Center's system for recording vehicle maintenance costs
has been limited to the following:
1. a basic inventory system, as maintained within the LOGIS financial
management system, which maintains records such as original purchase value,
licensing information and an elementary straight -line depreciation schedule
2. an accounting system again as maintained within the LOGIS financial
management system which provides adequate accounting records for auditing
purposes but provides no information as to operation and maintenance of
individual pieces of equipment.
3. a fuel usage report which is generated from the newly installed fuel -
monitoring system. This report does show total fuel consumption on a
per vehicle basis and calculates fuel consumption and fuel costs on a per
mile (or per hour) basis. However, this information must now be manually
included into the "Monthly Equipment Cost Summary (see next item).
4. a "Monthly Equipment Cost Summary" which is prepared manually by our clerical
staff at the City garage which summarizes only labor costs, material
costs for each item of equipment on a monthly basis.
No.attempt has been made to regularly combine this raw information with
the costs of depreciation, insurance, overhead, etc. in order to get the
true costs of ownership and operation of individual items of equipment,
nor to calculate costs for equipment on a "life -to -date" basis. Accordingly,
this report has a very limited value as a management tool.
August .10, _1984 - G.G. Splinter
Page 2
B. LOGIS' Vehicle Management System
LOGIS has recently developed a "Vehicle Management System" (VMS) at a cost
of approximately $50,000. This program has been designed specifically for
LOGIS users and offers the following features:
1. Interface with LOGIS Financial Management system - allows single -entry
of purchase order and receiving information and assures compatibility of
cost- accounting systems with vehicle management system information.
2. "Life Cycle Costing" - whereby the costs of ownership, (including depre-
ciation, insurance and overhead) as well as all costs for operation and
maintenance (labor, fuel, parts, etc.) and preventive maintenance are
included - so as to provide meaningful management information i.e. the
true total costs of ownership, operation and maintenance over the life
of the vehicle, both in total dollars and in costs per mile (or per
hour) i.e. a "rental rate" determination.
3. Preventive Maintenance Scheduling - allows scheduling of various preventive
maintenance functions and can present detailed instructions and work to
be performed on a preventive maintenance basis.
4. Inventory - In addition to general inventory information, the VMS includes
a running inventory of parts for each piece of equipment, along with vendor
information, purchasing and receiving information.
5. Repair History - along with equipment costs, the VMS provides a repair
history for each piece of equipment.. This history not only contains a
history of repair costs, but information regarding type of repair (motor,
frame, electrical, etc.) and "down time" or "waiting - for -parts time ".
6.. Interface with Fuel Management System - The WIS will provide an automated
interface with our new fuel management system - assuring timely and accurate
inclusion of this information into the overall cost analysis.
C. Use Of Information From VMS
Following is a partial listing of some of the ways in which information available
from the VMS program would or could be used:
1. Equipment Replacement Schedule
By charting the life cycle costs of each piece of equipment it is possible
to establish an optimum schedule for replacement (i.e. at what point do
the continued costs for an old piece of equipment exceed the costs of a
new piece of equipment ?).
By "comparing notes" with other LOGIS cities who are using this same
program, we can develop a very reliable data base. And by using the
"what -if" capabilities of the computer, we will be able to improve our
decision making process regarding equipment replacement, major overhaul,
or repair.
Ai ii�tzst _ 6) 1984 - G.G. -SI1 inter
l' i f_;e
2. Use of Rental Rates
.
With meaningful "rental rates „ available, we will be able to develop a much
better accounting of project and /or Program costs.
In addition, the calculation to total ownership costs will allow us to
compare costs of ownership vs. costs for lease of similar equipment.
(Note: for pieces of equipment which have little usage, the total cost of
ownership may well exceed the cost for leasing similar equipment.)
If development of a "Central Equipment Pool” is desired at some future time,
the availability of meaningful "rental rates" would greatly facilitate
implementation of this management strategy.
3. Use of Preventive Maintenance (PM) Scheduling
With proper PM, the costs for repair and the amount of downtime for every
piece of equipment should be significantly reduced.
4. Diagnosis of Mechanical Problems
By being able to instantly "call up" the lifetime history of repair
problems, a mechanic will be able to substantially reduce the amount of
guess work involved in diagnosing mechanical problems. Such a history
may also indicate that it will be more effective to replace a major com-
ponent than to. repair it.
S. Use for Developing Equipment Specifications
By utilizing. the information available through VMS,. it will be possible
to develop better specifications for future equipment purchases by checking
such things as:
(a) how does the cost for owning and operating a 27,500 lb. GVtV truck compare
to the cost of owning and operating a 24,000 1b. GVW truck?
(b) what is the cost of owning and operating a Police Squad car with a
"Police Package" (i.e. heavy duty axles, springs, transmission, etc.)
as compared to the cost of owning and operating a production -model
car (also as a squad car)?
(c) is it more economical to use old squad cars as staff vehicles or to
purchase economy cars for this duty?
(d) what is the history of our "Brand X" vehicles as compared to our
"Brand Y vehicles - in cost, in "down -time" and ''waiting- for -parts
time" or in safety record?
August 10, 1,984 - G.G. Splinter
Page 4
D. Anticipated Usage, Costs And Cost Savings
1. Usage
Initially, we would propose to enter approximately 160 pieces of motor
vehicles, and portable equipment into the V4S. This equipment has a
total replacement value of $2.4 million, with an annual replacement value
of $200,000 and an annual operation and maintenance budget of $317,000
(1984 budget for Division 43).
With relatively minor adaptations or enhancements of the VMS, we should be
able to utilize many of its features (cost accounting, preventive maintenance
schedulin g repair air histo rY etc. ) in relation to fixed mechanical equipment
such as major HVAC units within the Civic Center, pumping stations, lift
stations, traffic signals, etc. This would increase the total number of
units being monitored via the VMS to 2S0 to 300.
2. Staffing Requirements
Our present clerical staff at the City garage consists of 1 full -time clerk and
1 half -time clerk. Of the total time available (2S0 hours /month) approximately
60 hours are spent on preparing vehicle reports, 9S hours are spent on other
accounting duties (ordering, encumbering, receiving, inventory) and the remaining
95 hours are spent on other duties (answering telephone and radio, processing
time cards for all Street and Park Division employees, typing, etc.)
Experience by Brooklyn Park indicates that the 15S hours per month now
being spent on manual data processing should be adequate to meet our
electronic data processing needs under the W4S system. Accordingly, no
increase (or decrease) in employee time is anticipated.
3. Costs
As indicated in my July 30, 1984 memo, the purchase costs for the HP150
microprocessor with appurtenances is $5,220, while operational costs are
estimated at $730 per month.
It should be noted that the $730 per month cost is based on LOGISts
current system charge of $5S0 per month. Ted Willard of LOGIS agrees
with us that this figure is high, based on usage by only a few cities.
As additional cities come up on this sytem, (5 other cities are already
committed to using it) and as LOGIS reviews its actuarial costs, we expect
this rate to be reduced, and we plan to continue to ask that this be done.
However, it is our belief that implementation of the system can be justified
even if this cost is not reduced.
4. Cost Savings
Information available through LOGIS, from the American Public Works
Association, and other sources indicate that the costs of vehicle and
equipment operation and maintenance will be-reduced between loo and
20% when a proper management information system is installed and properly
used.
At gust 10, 19'0A -- G.G. arl iiac r
Pa ge S
Because it will take some time to develop the system to its full
potential, my best estimate is that our cost savings will be approximately
5% during the second year of operation and increase to 10o within 5 years.
With a 5% savings during 1986 we would realize a cost reduction of
approximately $15,000 (i.e. 50 of our $317,000 Vehicle Maintenance Division
budget). This indicates a "break- even" time of 2 or 3 years, with
substantial cost savings in the years ahead.
E. Alternative Systems
Many alternative EDP systems have been developed by other vendors for use
with truck fleets etc. However, before developing VDSS, LOGIS conducted an
extensive study of available hardware /software programs and found none which
were compatible with the needs of LOGIS member cities.
Obviously, it would also be possible to develop a manual accounting system
which would P rovide this type of information. However, the costs for operating
a manual system which would provide the same type of information would be
exorbitant. It is obvious that the reason we don't have such a system inplace
is because previous administrations arrived at that same conclusion - it would
not be cost effective.
Summary and Recommendation
Based on the above analysis and information, I again recommend purchase of the
microprocessor and implementation of the VMS system.
Respectfully submitted,
�2
t�
SK:)
- t
CIZY 6301 0-11111GLE Cliie "K Ijl1t +i..:mx.v
OF
5 T BROOKLYN CENTER, rJiN'NESOTA 55430
!_. ` 1i 1
TELEPHONE 561 -5440
T* t J EMERGENCY - POLICE - FIRE
911
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: July 30, 1984
RE: Recommendation To Purchase Microprocessor Eor Use At City Garage
LOGIS has recently completed development of a new "Vehicle Management System"
(XIMS) software program. The primary purpose of this program is to provide manage -
ment information regarding vehicle maintenance. The system has been installed for
use by Brooklyn Park (the pilot City) and is now being installed at Edina. St.
Louis Park, Maple Grove and Coon Rapids plan to install this program in the near
future.
It is recommended that Brooklyn Center purchase an IIP150 Microcomputer for installa-
tion at the City Garage, to allow the City to use the VIOLS program. Although no
direct cost reductions are anticipated as a result of this application, it is
a nticipated that the system will provide a greatly improved management information
system which will result in long -term cost savings.
Estimated Costs
Estimated costs for purchase of the HP150 and appurtenances is as follows:)
HP150 Microprocessor $ 3,450
Epson RX80 Printer = 495
212A Modem 565
212 LP Modem 395
Telephone 53
Surge Protector 140
Subtotal 5
Install Telephone Line (Est.) 122
TOTAL $ 5,220
Estimated operational costs are as follows:
LOGIS VHS System Charges $ 550 /month
LOGIS Other Charges 78 /month
Telephone Line Charges 102 /month
TOTAL $ 730 /month
0
,,r f�rt ., �/t oat Gild
11�1 G, ,;I,1 if.,cr
1'agc 2
0 I An "Intel l i,�cnt Tcnrninal.
It is noted that a "dumb terminal" (i.e. a C.R.T. unit with a printer) could he
used to activate this program. 11ic cost for this work station would be $2,943
v.s. the $5,098 cost for the proposed unit. However, the proposed unit has the
following advantages:
1. The WIS as developed by LOGIS allows a direct interface between our Fuel
Ibnagement System and the microprocessor. No such interface has been developed
for use with a dumb terminal. Accordingly, to feed fuel usage information into
the VMS program 2 alternatives are available, i.e.:
Alternate A : Purchase the printer unit requi to print out the information
from the fuel management unit at an estimated cost of $1,000.
(Note: To -date we have been able to use the company's used printer
on a rent -free basis. However, this arrangement cannot be
continued indefinitely.)
In addition, this alternate would require manual transfer of
information from the Fuel Management System to the terminal. At
an estimated 30 minutes per day, the cost of this factor is
approximately $1,500 /year (including salary plus fringe benefits).
Alternate B : The estimated cost for development of an interface between the
Fuel Management System and the dumb terminal is "up to $7,000"
according to Gary Fish of LOGIS.
2. It is anticipated that additional program applications will become available
for effective application at the City Garage within the next few years. These
applications may include inventory management (signs, streets, public utilities,
etc.); access to mapping systems; and some possible work management systems.
Although many of these applications also could be accomplished on a dumb
terminal, others can't or would be done more efficiently on an intelligent
terminal.
3. It is my belief that within a few years nearly all work stations will utilize
intelligent terminals. Accordingly, we would then have the many advantages
which come with uniformity of systems, i.e. better understanding and cooperation
between users, elimination of incompatibility problems between hardware and soft-
ware, ability to exchange units in the event of mechanical failure, etc.
jldly A New IIP150 Instead Of A Used HP125
Ilse of a used HP125 (either by transfer from another City Department or'by purchase
from an outside source) is a workable option. It is estimated that the cost for this
option would be approximately equal to the cost of a dumb terminal. however, I
wish to note the following considerations:
1. We are requesting that another 111 be purchased for the Engineering Division
in 1085. Since Engineering personnel will work closely with personnel at the
City Garage (on computer applications, including tlic ti',�LS, future mapping; in
inventory app] _icatlolls, etc.), there is much to be said for total compatibility
between these two work stations.
.i1e .5
2. If a used 111 is purchased from an outside source, we may not have a good
"handl c l I on i is coi id i. t, i on - and wool d not get the t etc. , I'll i ch comes
with a new unit.
3. PMic service availability for an lIP12S may be equal to that for an IIPl.50 now,
this nviy not be true in the future.
4. Trade -in value for the IU should always be higher than for the IIP12S.
Budget Considerations
No provision was made in the 1984 budget for purchase of this equipment. Accordingly,
a transfer from the Revenue Sharing Fund is requested.
The 1984 budget for Unallocated Departmental Expenses (Division 80) does include
provision for $3,000 for operating expenses for the WI,S program.
A resolution for consideration by the City Council is provided.
Respectfully submitted,
v J'app
cc: Paul 11olmlund, Director of Finance
SK: j r� `
r�
I-
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
AUGUST 9, 1984
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Planning Commission met in regular session and was called to order by Chairman
George Lucht at 7:32 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chairman George Lucht, Commissioners Molly Malecki, Mary Simmons and Mike Nelson.
Also present were Director of Planning and Inspection Ronald Warren, City Engineer
James Grube and Planning Assistant Gary Shallcross. Chairman Lucht noted that
Commissioner Ainas had called to say he would be unable to ,attend and was excused.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 26 1984
Motion by Commissioner Malecki seconded by Commissioner Nelson to approve the
minutes of the July 26, 1984 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. Voting in
favor: Commissioner Malecki, Simmons, Manson and Nelson. Voting against: none.
Not voting: Chairman Lucht. The motion passed.
APPLICATION NOS. 84027 AND 84028 (H. E. Hanes, Inc.)
Following the Chairman's explanation, the Secretary introduced the first two
items of business, a request for site and building plan and special use permit
approval for an office condominium development on the land presently occupied by
residences addressed 7020 and 7040 Brooklyn Boulevard and also for a request for
preliminary plat approval to resubdivide into two parcels the land contained in the
lots addressed 7020 and 7040 Brooklyn Boulevard and 7025 Halifax Avenue North. The
Secretary reviewed the contents of the staff reports (see Planning Commission
Information Sheets for Application Nos. 84027 and 84028 attached). The Secretary
also reviewed with the Planning Commission the Standards for a Special Use Permit
and noted that the office use of the property which is a special use acknowledged
under Section 35 -312 of the Zoning Ordinance was reviewed somewhat during the
rezoning application.
The Planning Assistant left at 8:00 p.m. and returned at 8:01 p.m.
Commissioner Nelson asked whether it was being recommended that the gap in the trees
along the east side of the site be closed. The Secretary answered that that should
be done if there is no easement for access through the office development.
Chairman Lucht then asked the applicant whether he had anything to add. Mr. Rick
Hartmann of H. E. Homes, Inc. explained that the gap in the trees would be filled in
during the original construction, but that the association documents for the office
condominium.project would allow for an access to be put in in the future if sought by
the church to the east.
PUBLIC HEARING (Application Nos. 84027 and 84028)
Chairman Lucht then opened the meeting for a public hearing and asked whether anyone
wished to speak regarding the special use permit application or the preliminary plat
application. Hearing none, he called for a motion to close the public hearing.
8 -9 -84 -1-
I
Motion by Commissioner Malecki seconded by Commissioner Manson to close the public
hearing. The motion passed'unanimously.
Commissioner Manson commented, regarding the idea of an access for the church
through the office condominium project, that it could result in a difficult
situation for cars turning left onto Brooklyn Boulevard. She recommended against
providing such an access.
There was a brief discussion regarding changing the name of the proposed preliminary
plat. Mr. Hartmann stated that he could change the name of the plat immediately.
The Secretary stated that the City's major concern was that the name of the
development not be confused with any governmental offices. He stated that the name
change could be accomplished prior to the City Council meeting.
ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 84027 (H. E. Homes, Inc.)
Motion by Commissioner Manson seconded by Commissioner Mnlecki to recommend
approval of Application No. 84027, subject to the following conditions:
1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building
Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance
of permits,
2. Grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to
review and appoval by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of
permits.
3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee
(in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be
submitted prior to the issuance,of permits to assure completion
of approved site improvements.
4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical
equipment shall be appropriately screened from view.
5. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire
extinguising system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected
to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the
City Ordinances.
6. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all
landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance.
7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to
Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances.
8. B612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and
driving areas.
.` The plans shall be modified prior to City Council consideration
to provide:
a. a grading plan depicting contours of both parking and
green areas around the entire site
8 -9 -84 -2-
b. parking delineators at both ends of the double row of
parking between the buildings
c. trash enclosures
d. opaque screening of the north and south ends of the east
parking area
10. Plan approval acknowledges the retention of 21 existing trees as
part of the proposed landscape plan. Should any of these
existing trees be removed or die prior to release of the
performance guarantee, they shall be replaced with an equal
number of shade trees, a minimum of 2 112" in diameter at
appropriate locations on the site.
11. As -built utility drawings shall be provided to the City Engineer
prior to the release of the performance guarantee.
12. The special use permit acknowledges an office condominium use in
the R3 zoning district and is subject to all applicable codes,
ordinances and regulations and violations thereof shall be
grounds for revocation.
13. Plan approval acknowledges the proposed landscape treatment
along the east side of the property as acceptable opaque
screening required between the office condominium use and the St.
Alphonsus Church property.
Voting in favor: Chairman Lucht, Commissioners Malecki, Simmons, Manson and
Nelson. Voting against: none. The motion passed.
ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 84028 (H. E. Homes, Inc.)
Motion by Commissioner Malecki seconded by Commissioner Nelson to recommend
approval of Application No. 84028, subject to the following conditions:
L The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City
Engineer.
2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the
City Ordinances.
3. The preliminary plat shall be modified prior to consideration by
the City Council to provide the following:
a. underlying and adjacent property lines
b. an access easement to 7015 Kyle Avenue North
c. expanded utility easement area adjacent to Lot 1
4. The two existing residences and accessory structures shall be
removed from Lot 1 prior to final plat approval.
8 -9 -84 ; -3-
5. The applicant shall enter into an agreement for the payment of
hookup charges for Lot 1 of the plat.
Voting in favor: Chairman Lucht, Commissioners Malecki, Simmons, Manson and
Nelson. Voting against: none. The motion passed.
APPLICATION NO. 84029 (Group Health, Inc.)
The Secretary then introduced the next item of business, a request for site and
building plan approval to construct a 20' x 20' storage garage on the the northeast
portion of the clinic site at 6845 Lee Avenue North. The Secretary reviewed the
contents of the staff report (see Planning Commission Information Sheet for
Application No. 84029 attached)
Chairman Lucht asked the the applicant whether he had anything to add regarding the
application. A representative of Group Health, Inc. responded in the negative.
Commissioner Manson asked whether the storage building would be screened from 69th
Avenue North. The Secretary explained that a fence, which presently screens the
trash container would extend in front of the storage building. Chairman Lucht also
referred to berming along 69th Avenue North.
ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 84029 (Group Health, Inc.)
Motion by Commissioner Malecki seconded by Commissioner Manson to recommend
approval of Application No. 84029, subject to the following condition:
1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building
Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance
of permits.
Voting n favor: Chairman Lucht Commissioners Malecki anson and
g s > Simmons, >
Nelson. Voting against: none. The motion passed.
APPLICATION NO. 84030 (Sharon McNamara)
The Secretary then introduced the final item of business, a request for special use
permit approval to conduct a home beauty shop in the basement of the residence at
6725 Quail Avenue North. The Secretary reviewed the contents of the staff report
(see Planning Commission Information Sheet for Application No. 84030 attached).
The Secretary noted the possibility for a parking problem on- street if the
appointments overlapped and stated that such an overlap should not occur in order to
avoid such on- street parking. He noted the floor plan in the Planning Commission
agenda which depicts the basement area where the home occupation would be conducted.
The Secretary also pointed out that an inspection of the premises was made by the
Building Official after the staff report was written. Based on that inspection,
permits for previous work would not be required.
Commissioner Simmons stated that, with a one -car driveway, it would seem that there
will be a problem in the evenings and on weekends as a result of family cars coming
and going from the property during the appointments. She stated that the likely
result would be parking of cars on- street. She stated that she thought the past
practise of the Planning Commission was to require that parking space be provided in
addition to requiring compliance with the condition that all parking be off-street.
The Secretary answered that this possibility was looked at, but recommended that the
situation be monitored and that additional space be required only if a problem
develops. Commissioner Simmons argued that it was not fair to require the
neighbors to put up with the problem and in essence enforce the conditions of the
8 -9 -64 -4-
speci. -il i_r -e permit Th(. Secretary re :: T)nnded that parking may not become a problem
at ail. '1i eCe was continued di3uu�siun " to at wrrat point additional parkiriLr 6pace
should be required.
Chairman Lucht asked the applicant whether she had anything to add. The
applicant's husband, Mr. McNamara, explained that the driveway is a single -car
driveway until it passes the house and that behind the house it widens to 30'. He
asked whether permits would be required for the work involved with the home
occupation. The Secretary stated that the need for permits would be discussed with
the Building Official.
PUBLIC HEARING (Application No. 84030)
Chairman Lucht then opened the meeting for a public hearing and asked whether anyone
present wished to speak regarding the application. Mrs. Lee Wirth of 6736 Quail
Avenue North stated that she agreed with Commissioner Simmons that the question of
providing off - street parking should be addressed before and not after a problem
develops. She stated that the neighbors do not always know the proper procedures
for getting compliance with the conditions of a special use permit. She also asked
what was the meaning of Condition No. 6. Chairman Lucht explained that the Sign
Ordinance allows home occupations to have a 2 112 sq. ft. sign.
Commisisoner Simmons asked whether a license was necessary in order to cut the hair
of family and friends as indicated in the applicant's letter. Mrs. McNamara
responded that she could lose her instructor's license if it were discovered that
she was cutting friends' hair without obtaining a separate license for a home beauty
shop. She stated that cutting the hair of family members was not regulated.
There followed a continued discussion regarding the possibility of cars parking in
the widened driveway area behind the house. Mr. McNamara stated that he generally
leaves his vehicles outside of the garage during the summer time, but added that he
could put them in the garage to make room for customers. Commissioner Simmons
stated that she didn't think it was right to make the neighbors responsible for
monitoring and enforcing the conditions of the special use permit. The Secretary
stated that neighbors are not expected to enforce the provisions of the permit, but
that neighbors may complain if there is a problem and that City staff will follow up
with an investigation which may lead to the amendment of the special use permit.
Comm t the neighbors rs robabl assumed that the City is
Commissioner Simmons stated that Y
�. g probably
keeping track of the situation, but in fact, the City is not.
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
Motion by Commissioner Malecki seconded by Commissioner Nelson to close the public
hearing. The motion passed unanimously.
ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 84030 (Sharon McNamara)
Motion by Commissioner Manson seconded by Commissioner Malecki to recommend
approval of Application No. 84030 subject to the following conditions:
1. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes,
.ordinances, and regulations and any violation thereof shall be
grounds for revocation.
2. The special use permit is issued to the applicant as operator of
the facility and is nontransferable.
8 -9 -84 -5-
3. All parking associated with the home beauty shop shall be of
street on improved space provided by the applicant.
4. All building modifications.associated with the home occupation
shall be completed pursuant to properly obtained permits and be
inspected by City inspectors prior to the issuance of the special
use permit.
5. The home occupation shall be conducted on an appointment only
basis with all work completed not later than 10:00 p.m. in the
_ evening.
6. Permit approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to
Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances.
7. Permit approval acknowledges a single - operator home beauty shop.
8. The applicant shall provide a current copy of her State
operator's license which shall be kept on file with the City.
Voting in favor Chairman Lucht, Commissioners Malecki, Manson and Nelson.
Voting against: Commissioner Simmons. The motion passed. Commissioner Simons
stated that her negative vote proceeded from the remarks she had made earlier in the
discussion.
There was a discussion of whether a meeting should be held on August 23, 1984 to
review possible plans for completion of the Earle Brown Farm Townhouses. The
Commission agreed that if the plans were in order they would just as soon take the
matter up on the August 23, 1984 meeting.
COMMISSIONER SIMMONS ANNOUNCES RETIREMENT FROM THE COMMISSION
Commissioner Simmons then informed the Commission that she would be retiring from
her position as a librarian and would begin taking a class in International
Economics in the fall and carrying on into the spring semester. She stated that the
class would be held on Thursday night and she had, therefore, decided to retire from
the Planning Commission after the September 13, 1984 meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Nelson seconded by Commissioner Malecki to adjourn the
meeting of the Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously. The Planning
Commission adjourned at 9:12 p.m.
Chairman
e
8 -9 -84 -6-
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 84027
, Applicant: H. E. Homes, Inc.
Location: 7020, 7040 Brooklyn Boulevard
Request: Site and Building Plan /Special Use
The applicant requests site and building plan and special use permit approval to build
an office condominium development on the land presently addressed 7020 and 7040
Brooklyn Boulevard. This land was the subject of Planning Commission Application No.
84013 for rezoning to R3 which was approved. The property is bounded by Brooklyn
Boulevard on the west, by the vacant old City Hall property zoned R5 on the north
and also by the end of 71st Avenue North on the north, by the St. Alphonsus Church
property on the east, and by an eight unit apartment building zoned R5 on the south.
Office uses up to two storeys in height are a special use in the R3 zoning district.
The proposed plan calls for one 30'wide access on Brooklyn Boulevard in the approxi-
mate middle of the site frontage. The development is to consist of 17 office condo -
minium units in two linear clusters of five and one L- shaped cluster of seven. The
units will have one floor above grade for office use and one floor below grade for
storage use. The total office area is to be 21,150 sq. ft. for a parking require -
ment of 105 stalls at roughly 1 stall per 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The
storage area comes to 18,780 sq. ft. which requires 23 parking stalls at one space
1 9 stalls because of
per 800 s ft. The total parking re 2
P q P 9 uirement comes to q
fractions. The site plan provides 127 stalls and the possibility of five or six_ additional
stalls if some existing trees to remain in parking lot islands were removed. Staff
recommend the addition of two parking delineators at each end of a double row of
parking between the buildings. Three handicapped spaces are provided in appropriate
locations as required by code.
The landscape plan provides generous green areas in the front greenstrip along
Brooklyn Boulevard. The southerly building is set back 29' from the south property
line allowing for a large green area on the south side of the site. A 15' buffer
strip as required by ordinance is planned along the east property line adjacent to
the St. Alphonsus Church property. The landscape plan calls for the retention of
eight within the parking numerous existing trees, including e g p 9 lot area and 13 additional
trees around the site. Of these existing trees, 15 are Elms, 4 are Maples and 2 are
Ash. In addition to existing trees, two Marshall's Green Ash are proposed in the
northwest portion of the site. Fifteen Black Hills Spruce are proposed along the
east property line to serve as screening. A gap has been left in this row of trees
to allow a possible driveway outlet from St. Alphonsus Church. (Staff would advise
against such an outlet, especially in light of the fact that the office development
will be governed by an association of owners). A landscaped planter area is proposed
on either side of the entrance to the site containing Pfitzer Junipers, Purple Leaf
Sand Cherries and Mock Orange shrubs. Additional Junipers are proposed in planter
areas along the front of the building. Sod and irrigation are to be provided in all
green areas.
The site is to drain generally toward the east side of the site where a storm sewer
connection will be made to a 27" public storm sewer which runs along the west side
of the St. Alphonsus church property. Connections to water and sanitary sewer will
be made to utilities within the same easement. Although some proposed spot elevations
have been shown on the site plan, a grading and berming plan should be submitted
prior to Council consideration providing more detailed information on the proposed
contours of the site. The plan does call for B612 curb and gutter around all
parking and driving areas as required by ordinance.
8 -9 -84 -1-
Application No. 84027 .continued
The building elevations provide °for a face brick exterior and cedar shingles. Solariu
modular glass enclosures are provided along portions of the north and west elevations
of the southerly 7 -unit building and along portions of the southerly elevation of
the two 5 -unit buildings on the north side of the site. These areas enclose common
area hallways which provide an interior access to each unit. Windows for the individual
units are to be casement windows. The proposed building plan also makes use of semi-
circular windows above the entrance doors and semicircular roof vents. An automatic
fire extinguishing system for each cluster building is to be provided.
Parking lot lighting is to be provided by 10 freestanding traditional style luminaires
on aluminum lightposts. Additional security lighting along the west building eleva-
tions will provide lighting to the westerly parking area. No exterior trash disposal
facilities are indicated on the plan.
Altogether the plans are generally in order and approval is recommended subject to
at least the following conditions:
1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building
Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance
of permits,
2. Grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to review
and approval by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of permits.
3. A -site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in
an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted
prior to the issuance of permits to assure completion of approved
site improvements.
4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical
equipment shall be appropriately screened from view.
5. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing
system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central
monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City_ Ordinances.
6. An underground irrigation system shall be.installed in all landscaped
areas to facilitate site maintenance.
7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter
34 of the City Ordinances.
8. B612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving
areas.
9. The plans shall be modified prior to City Council consideration to
provide:
a a grading plan depicting contours of both parking and
green areas around the entire site
b. parking delineators at both ends of the double row of
parking between the buildings
8 -9 -84 -2-
Application No. 84021 continual
c. trash enclosures
d. opaque screening of the north and south ends of east
parking area
10. Plan approval acknowledges the retention of 21 existing trees as part
of the proposed landscape plan. Should any of these existing trees be
removed or die prior to release of the performance guarantee, they
shall be replaced with an equal number of shade trees, a minimum of
22" in diameter at appropriate locations on the site.
11. As -built utility drawings shall be provided to the City Engineer
prior to the release of the performance guarantee.
12. The special use permit acknowledges an office condominium use in the
R3 zoning district and is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances
and regulations and violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation.
8 -9 -84 -3-
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 84028
Applicant: H. E. Homes, Inc.
location: 7020, 7040 Brooklyn Boulevard
`Request: Preliminary Plat
The applicant requests preliminary plat approval to subdivide into two lots the parcels
of land presently addressed as 7020 and 7040 Brooklyn Boulevard and 7025 Halifax
Avenue North. The property in question is bounded by Brooklyn Boulevard on the west,
by the vacant old City Hall property and single - family residences on the north, by
Halifax Avenue North on the east, and by 70th Avenue North, Edina Realty, a single-
family home and ar eight -unit apartment building on the south. The land is presently
occupied by two single - family residences and by St. Alphonsus Church. An office
condominium development is proposed for the westerly lot of the subdivision, in place
of the residences.
The existing legal description of the property is a metes and bounds description of
part of Lots. 4 and 5 of Auditor's Subdivision No. 57. The proposed legal description
is Lot l and Lot 2, Block 1, Brooklyn Village Offices Addition. Staff recommend that
the title of the plat be changed so as not to sound like governmental offices of the
City and perhaps to better accommodate the existing church. Lot 1 (the office condo
site) is to be 2.406 acres, exceeding the 1 acre minimum for office uses adjacent
to major thoroughfares. Lot 2 is to be 17.99 acres for the church use. Lot i is
zoned R3; Lot 2 is zoned Rl.
The proposed plat shows right -of -way dedication for 70th Avenue North and for Halifax
Avenue North. A 15' wide sidewalk easement is indicated for 678' along Halifax
Avenue North. A 60' wide utility easement is also shown on the west side of Lot 2
and extending a few feet onto Lot 1. Based on the utility layout shown on the pro-
posed site plan (Application No. 84027), staff believe additional utility easement
area may be needed for the connection of the office condo utilities to the public
utilities in the easement.
The proposed plat does not show any existing structures and does not show some
underlying and adjacent parcels. While it is not necessary to show existing
structures, underlaying and adjacent lots shou ld be identified along with an access
easement to the residence at 7015 Kyle Avenue North. In addition, there has been
possible access easement for the church through the office
some discussion about a 9
i P
n Staff recommend against such an
1 n n shown. condo property. This has also of bee 9
P P Y
easement, but it should be shown on the preliminary plat if it is being pursued.
The proposed Lot 1 is presently occupied by two residences. These will have to be
removed prior to final plat approval to prevent two residences from occupying a
single parcel
The preliminary plat is generally acceptable and approval is recommended, subject
to at least the following conditions:
1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City
Engineer.
2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the
City Ordinances.
3. The preliminary plat shall be modified prior to consideration by
the City Council to provide the following:
8 -9 -84 -1-
Application No. 84028 continued
a. underlying and adjacent property lines
b. an access easement to 7015 Kyle Avenue North
c. expanded utility easement area adjacent to Lot 1
d. access easement rhough Lot 1 if acceptable to all
parties
4. The two existing residences and accessory structures shall be removed
from Lot 1 prior to final plat approval,
5. The applicant shall enter into an agreement for the payment of hookup
charges for Lot 1 of the plat.
6. The applicant shall propose a new name for the plat at the time of
City Council consideration.
s
8 -9 -84 -2-
p rorEwi,, -,ion !nformai.lon `7h(i f _,
Application No. 84029
Applicant: Group Health, Inc.
Location: 6845 Lee Avenue North
Request: Site and Building Plan
The applicant requests site and building plan approval to construct a 20' x 20'
storage building at the Group Health Clinci at 6845 Lee Avenue North. The property
in question is zoned Cl and is bounded by Noble Avenue North on the west, by 69th
Avenue North on the north, by Lee Avenue North on the east, and by the Northern
States Power Company service center on the south. The clinic is a permitted use in
the C1 zoning district. Under Section 35 -411 of the Zoning Ordinance, all storage
in the C1 zone is to be in an enclosed building.
The proposed building is to be located in the northwesterly portion of the site, to
the north of the existing clinic building. It is to be set back 106.5' from 69th
Avenue North and 72'f rom Noble Avenue North. This exceeds the minimum 50' setback
' 1 The storage building will be
off 69th and 25 off Noble. e g 9 served by an existing .
r vides access to the trash
i drive off Noble Avenue North which o
service presently p P
container.
The proposed building is basically a small two -car residential garage structure with
an overhead door on the west side and an entry door on the south side. The purpose of
the garage is to store lawn equipment, snow removal equipment and some paper, etc.
The exterior of the building is to be stucco painted white to match the clinic.
There are no parking requirements for the storage building and no new landscaping is
i with this development
.There are no site deficiencies that need to be R
proposed.
corrected. Approval, is therefore recommended, subject to the following condition:
1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building
Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance
of permits.
8 -9 -84
Planning Cornrnission Information Sheet
Application No. 84030
Applicant: Sharon K. McNamara
Location: 6725 Quail Avenue North
Request: Special Use Permit /Home Occupation
The applicant requests special use permit approval to conduct a home beauty shop in
the basement of the residence at 6725 Quail Avenue North. The property in question
is zoned Rl and is bounded on the east by Quail Avenue and on the north, west and
south by other single- family homes. Home beauty shops are classified under the Zoning
Ordinance as a special use in the Rl zoning district.
The applicant has submitted a letter (attached) describing the proposed home occupa-
tion. Mrs. McNamara explains that she teaches full time at a beauty school and
wishes to have a part -time shop of her own to cut hair of friends and family. She
states that her hours of operation would be some Saturdays, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
and 6:30 to 9:00 p.m. either Tuesday or Thursday evening. She notes that there is
off - street parking in her driveway and that only one car at a time will come to her
house. Mrs. McNamara also points. out that she possesses a Cosmetology Manager
Operator License. She notes safety features in her basement area including two fire
extinguishers and a smoke detector and also states that she will be the only operator
working in the shop.
The proposed home occupation generally falls within the parameters set by the Zoning
Ordinance for home occupations. However, the existing driveway is only a single
car wide. Staff have some concern that, if appointments overlap at all, cars will
begin to park on- street. It also appears that work associated with the home
occupation has been done in the basement area without proper building permits. Such
0 permits will have to be taken and the work properly inspected before the special use
permit can be granted.
In general, the application appears to be in order and approval is recommended,
subject to at least the following conditions:
1. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances,
and regulations and any violation thereof shall be grounds for
revocation.
2. The special use permit is issued to the applicant as operator of the
facility and is nontransferable.
3. All parking associated with the home beauty shop shall be off- street
on improved space provided by the applicant.
4. All building modifications associated with the home occupation shall
be completed pursuant to properly obtained permits and be inspected
by City inspectors prior to the issuance of the special use permit.
5. , The home occupation shall be conducted on an appointment only basis
with all work completed no later than 10:00 p.m. in the evening.
6. Permit approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to
Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances.
7. Permit approval acknowledges a single- operator home beauty shop.
8 -9 -84
M & C NO. 84-10
August 17, 1984
FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: American Legion Club Liquor License Violation
Jo the Honorable Mayor and City Council:
Attached is a memorandum from our Police Department indicating violations of our
liquor license laws and gambling statutes. The Police Chief is recommending a 20
day suspension. I concur in that recommendation.
If the City Council concurs with the staff in the matter that some sort of suspension
of license is warranted under these circumstances, then the first action of the
Council would be to send the licensee written notice setting a hearing on the
violation. It is my understanding, to be confirmed by the City Attorney, the
Council has two choices on how to handle the hearing. It can call a hearing and
appoint a hearing examiner, or it can choose to hold the hearing directly before the
City Council. It is recommendation, n the Cit Attorne 's concurrence the
upon Y �
Y Po Y
Council appoint a special hearing examiner to conduct the public hearing and certify
the findings back to the City Council.
Should the Council choose the hearing examiner alternative, I would recommend the
Council authorize the City Manager to appoint a hearing examiner. If the Council
chooses to hold the hearing before itself rather than use the hearing examiner
alternative, I would recommend the hearing date be set as your second regularly
scheduled meeting in September.
Should the Council members have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Gerald G. Spli ter
City Manager
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
Members of the City Council
FROM: James Lindsay, Chief of Police
DATE: August 8, 1984
SUBJECT: Recommended Suspension of On -Sale Club License
for Brooklyn Center American Legion Post 4630
There were three incidents which led to an investigation of
activities at the Brooklyn Center American Legion Post. They
were an incident on June 9, 1984 of late night drinking and
barring an officer's admittance; an accident in which the driver
had a plastic container of alcohol which he stated was purchased
at the Legion which would constitute an off -sale violation; and
an accident involving a domestic type situation in which the
parties had apparently been drinking to excess inside the Legion
and were not cut off at any point. Also, the department was
receiving anonymous phone calls referring to late night drinking
and gambling taking place at the Legion. We had a meeting with
Legion Post representatives at which they did admit to the
gambling violations and they were informed of all problems we
were having. At that time Investigator Hennessy was assigned to
random interview present and recent past members in order to
investigate all charges. As a result of all of the above
circumstances, the following has been determined.
Following is a list of violations which have occurred in the
Brooklyn Center American Legion Post #630. These violations have
been investigated and discussed with the Management of the Post.
In listing the violations, we have started with the State Statute
or Brooklyn Center Ordinance which is in violation, a brief
description of the Statute or Ordinance, and a brief description
of the incident.
BC%OR 11 -512 Consumption or display after 1:00 a.m. This stems
from an incident of June 9, 1984 in which Sergeant Weeks did
observe people inside the club and glasses on the tables at 1:41
a.m.
DCfOR 11- 501(4) Selling off -sale. This involves an incident of
May 18, 1984 in which an individual was arrested for D.W.I. At
the time of his arrest, he was in possession of a plastic cup
containing a mixed drink. When questioned as to where he had
purchased the drink, he stated that he had - purchased it at the
Brooklyn Center American Legion and that the bartender had
purposely put the drink into the plastic glass so that he could
leave with it as they were closing.
Memo to Splinter & Council
Page 2
August 8, 1984
BCZQ 3 -511 Police Officers allowed to inspect the premises.
This also stems from the incident of June 9, 1984. When Sergeant
Weeks observed the people inside with drinks through the window,
he rang for admittance. It took a very long time before the
bartender did finally open the door to the Sergeant and when he
did he still tried to bar him from entering by blocking the
doorway with his body.
During the course of investigating the above matters, it came to
our attention from several of the current and past members of the
club that quite a bit of gambling was also going on in the
premises. When questioned about this,, club management did
admit to all of the gambling allegations. We do not, however,
have specific incidents to cite. Any gambling on the premises,
however, is in violation of several Statutes and Ordinances which
we now list.
BC/OR 11- 511(17) No licensee shall keep, possess, or operate or
permit the keeping, possession, or operation of any gambling
device or apparatus on the licensed premises and he shall not
permit any gambling therein.
B!QZOR_23 -1901 Requires a gambling license to do legal gambling
in the City of Brooklyn Center.
g!C/9R 23- 1906(8) Requires a $10,000 fidelity bond or a waiver by
the City Council in order to have a gambling license.
MN /SS 609.755(4) .Whoever does any of the following is guilty of
a misdemeanor:
(4) Permits a structure or location owned or occupied by him or
under his control to be used as a gambling place.
iNISS 609.76(6) Whoever does any of the following may be
sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to
payment of a fine of not more than $1,000, or both: (6)
Receives, records, or forwards bets or offers to bet or, with
intent to receive, record, or forward bets or offers to bet,
possesses facilities to do so.
HN , /SS 349,26(1,0-L Profits from the operation of gambling devices
or the conduct of raffles shall be used solely for lawful
purposes as defined in section 349.12(6), and as authorized at a
regular meeting of the organization.
MN /SS 34.9.26(13) Requires separate records of the gross
receipts. Requires the person who accounts for gross receipts,
expenses and profits shall not be the same person who accounts
for other revenues of the organization. Requires monthly
Page 3
August 8, 1984
reporting to the membership and Police Department of gross
receipts, expenses and profits and their distribution. These
records must be kept for three years.
After having two meetings with the Manager and some of the Board
from the Legion Post, I feel that the problems that are occuring
there are mostly due to 'a lack of responsible management. We
were told that they did not know that.the gambling they were
doing was illegal although they did have a Brooklyn Center
gambling license until 1982 and that the drinking problems they
are having are because of the younger members of the club. I
informed them that this was a possibility, but they were still
responsible to see that the violations did not occur. They
stated that they have rules against many of these violations, but
I informed them that rules do no good unless someone enforces
them.
It should be noted that at this time all gambling has been
stopped in the club and we have discussed with them that in the
future if they are in doubt as to whether or not something is
legal they should call us. The management has been cooperative
with us through our investigation into these matters. Also, the
bartender in the late night incident has been fired by club
• management and given a tag by the Police Department.
Based on our investigation of the above matters and our meetings
g 9
with the management of the Legion Post, at this time I would
recommend that their liquor license (on -Sale Club) be suspended
for twenty (20) days.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
r
FROM: Jim Lindsay, Chief of Police,
DATE: August 13, 1984
SUBJECT: Taxi Cab License for Yellow Taxi
We have received an application for a taxi cab license from
Yellow Taxi. Officer Filson has done a background check
on each of the drivers and a safety check on the cabs involved.
We have also received a copy of a Certificate of Insurance
from their insurance carrier. At this point everything appears
to be in order and we can find nothing of a questionable
nature which would preclude issuance of this license.
A'l7., tai 0t�f.dV jfH:'1
I : Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROIM: James Lindsay, Chief of Police
DATE: AUgust. 14, 1984 .
SUBJECT: Gambling License Application for Earle Brown Parent -
Teacher Association
Attached please find the completed police investigation of Earle
Brown School Parent- Teacher Association in application for a
Class B gambling license. Named in the application are applicants
Marianne Ruth Lerbs, secretary, and Julie Ann Swenson, gambling
manager.
Investigator Monteen's report finds nothing of a questionable
nature revealed during the course of the investigation. In addi-
tion to the application for a Class B ,gambling license, the
Earle Brown School Parent- Teacher Association has requested a
waiver of the $10,000 fidelity bond as provided by the State
Statute and City Ordinance. The City Council must act on the
following matters:
1. An application for a Class B gambling license.
This requires a majority vote of the City Council to
pass,
Z. The waiver of the $10,000 fidelity bond.
This requires the unanimous vote of the City Council
to pass.
ailE' ! t�l 71'1; j ls! 1 1 9 t)okIyn l,t.�ltfi.t'T }'Ca�.��C €'•
z t •i .uC E f. .
lti eparti" ' on't Casc Fi_j.(' °�'ln?bor 84 f S a .f3E l
' FI Y)i)] icEltion o { t } � . 1tv )i3 { F y Ie �iYUW
* 1.1G'nLii_ry f.c t �'• �� ciicI,er Assoc�t�:t 1 iitnne RlIt11 1.'ER S, svc
>' t ��� d 1 F -
1r y, a1 "t( ��t ?11v +11n f i t t r? a, Tiilll)i 11 %lllitk E'. in aj)Pli ctltiCn fOr £a C',lz ss id
;i11,1bL:11 ; Iic��n.� €- as i�,sl (d t.>y ttlf= City of i�rc�c�klYre Cc rater. 1 11onnepin. CucntY,
Tltis inve� ti s�it�� >r1 vas curb; +_icted by A. Paul A101.1 T 13 and is
tr ans cr bed and typewritte by Lori NOV,1K. clerl.- tyl }ist for tho Brooklyn
Canter Pol ice Department
APPLICANT �
The Parent-Teacher Association of
P.arle Brown Elementary School
59001 Humboldt Avenu North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
phone - 561 -4480
s
Marianne Ruth LERBS 4
6125 Camden Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
phone - 561 -8697
Julie Ann StdEN ON
5744 Bryant Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
phone - 566 -8035
ESTIGATION MATERIALS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS CASE PILE
An application for a gambling license.
An application for a gambling license, Part II, in the name of Marianne_
Ruth LERBS.
An application for a gambling license. Part II, in the name of Julie Ann
SWENSON.
An application for a gambling lice=nse, Part III Organizat Information.
A letter addressed to "whom it may concern" requesting the waiver of a
510,000 fidelity bond.
A copy of the bylaws of the Earle Brown Elementary School, Parent - Teacher
Association as amended in 1983.
- ---- - - - - -- ---------- -------- ----- --------- -- ---- -r ----. ---- -r-- -- --r.
The Earle Brown Elementary School, Parent-Teacher Association is a focal �
unit of the Parent- Teachers Associations organized under the authority of
the National Congress of Parents and Teachers. This Association exi
" as an* unincorporated association of its membership. The Earle Brown Parent -
Teacher Association is housed and holds its regular meetings at.. the - :Earl
a Brown Elementary School, located at 5900 Humboldt Avenua< North, .wit:�in i3
,corporate limits of the City of Brooklyn Center. Hennepin Count�g,
xThe,, arl€� Brown Parent - Teacher Association has been in existe ce f'o -Mcre
tllari' the required thirty -six month period, however, the, date of '"1; izl :.
is unavailable to this investigator at the time of this resume.. Tue bylaws
of the organization were amended in 1983 and prior to tbat ti .A „, had
0 •mended in 1978, indicating; organization prlor� to t1lose date.. -The.
own Parent-Teacher Association has an activ € >`me.mb €�rship of OTiro JMa'�'
our hundred. and draws its membership from the parents and teacher' ini tie•` .�
Brooklyn Center School District who may have children attend,1lt& or an
association with the Earle Brown Elementary School. r.�'
♦ 1 G ll + 1 t. . A 6 Vii_ t: Z
c,'tiecrT'l��xr x;S� did' C)�lt cal 3�
Assoc
j .lyr C in the yc ar1 ,
cslId 19 1 k , i_:> arE ?� 1 i._ t t :'ii +. Th( quid comply with the f� lj llc
1 x. a y a r x t
c! �. s � € Tip" z) i :i;! >tatt.4 , of the Statt., of mint£ _ Il
or 1- 4£' City of Broj],lyn Comer. Moreover, the recor
he iti o'(4 C T1 t, <'r 4P Ic j'. o1)itr tiftcnt indicated that tiles Earle Brown
A. SoC.i."I. < ion E'2;= t: zi e-: t farm 990 with t`:Te_a Internal Re veanile
Jc a m=ice= in 1,hen year 197`9. �I,c��.e'vt'r, no farm was filed for the years 1980,
1f 81 or 1983 as the x leme ntary School Parent- Tvacl3ors Association did not
,employ professional fennel rraitetr during that time period, nor did they raise
irr excess of $10,000 during any calendar ye=ar. Likewise, no charitable=
report form was filed with the Department of Commerce in the State of
A'I'illTtf?SO�;R.
Marianne Ruth LERBS, the secretary of the Earle Brown Parent - Teacher
Association, made= application for the Class B gambling license on behalf
of the Earle Brown Pare =nt - Teache =r Association. LERBS is a resident of the
City of Brooklyn Center and has resided at 6125 Camden Avenue North since
October of 1982, prior to that time, and fron April of 1977, Airs. LERBS
lived at 5103 Emerson Avenue North in the City of Minneapolis. Prior to
that, Airs. LERBS resided at three other addresses within the limits of
the City of Minneapolis and in St. Paul, Minnesota. firs. LERBS is a
recreation spe=cialist who is employed by they Minneapolis Park Board as
well as the Earle Brown Elementary School. Mrs. LERBS has been employed
by the Northside Neighborhood Services, Inc., located at 41st and Dupont,
W a nursery -time aid from January of 1980 through January of 1984. In
ecking the records of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office, Jail Records
Divisi=on, the Warrant Office, and NCIC and MINCIS, nothing of a criminal
nature was found. Piles with the Brooklyn Center Police Department show
that she was involved in a property damage accident in the year 1983.
Airs. LERBS has a valid Class B driver's license with no violations.
Julie Ann SWENSON is likewise named in the application as gambling manager.
Airs. SWENSON is also a resident of the City of Brooklyn Center, residing
at 5744 Bryant Ave=nue North. firs. SWENSON has resided at that address
since December of 1977 and prior to that tune, was a resident of the City
of Fridley. Mrs. SWENSON is employed as a bookkeeper for Boeser Sheetmeatal
at 417 West Broadway and prior to 1982, was an employee of the Knutson
Mortgage Company in the Escrow Department. Airs. SWENSON has no record of
any criminal activity in checking with the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office
or the State of Minnesota She has no record with the City of Brooklyn
Center and does held a valid Class C driver's license with the State of
Minnesota that has no violations.
Accompanying the ap for a Class 8 gambling license for the Earle
Brown Elementary School, Parent - Teacher Association is a letter addressed
to whom it may concern and requests that the City Council waive they $10,000
fidelity bond as required by the State Statute and City Ordinance. Inves
tigator MONTEEN found nothing which would preclude the issuance of the
Class B gambling license to the Earle Brown Elementary School, Parent 0eacher Association or its gambling manager.
The City Council must act on the following two matters: The application
for a Class B gambling license which requires the majority vote of the
A. t l.i<I
.. to � r a 4..r '.>�` A f (' 01 0 030 Loup
"�!� y
cou ncil Lo a a 5 A waivvr o t o 11 f IdW ity f >1'd, which T'equiTt ;
AMU`)11 °1H!'1 1JI'VI - Oil , i,lt`lUit
Br ookdale I ast Cir�err�a � � 5801 John 1 actin Drive
•arle Erown Bowl /JEM Amusements 6 -10 James Circle
za Palace 5001 Drew Avenue North
Po de Chief cv
AMUSEMENT DEVICE - VENDOR
Carousel International Corp. P.O. Box 307 fi', ��..
PF ce Chief V '
RENTAL DWELLING LICENSE
Initial:
D. Gee & P. Jacobson 1537 Humboldt Place
D. Gee & P. Jacobson 1543 Humboldt Place
Bart Greenwood 4201 Lakeside Ave. #218
Wayne K. Pearson 6900 Toledo Ave. N.
John DeVries 2931 67th Lane
John DeVries 2911 68th Lane
Duluth Redevelopment 401 69th Ave. N.
Gene Bevers 419 69th Ave. N.
Renewal:
Lyn River Corp. Lyn River Apartments
Gale W. Pierce 5960 Brooklyn Blvd.
Keith L. Nordby 5964 Brooklyn Blvd.
Bertil G. Johnson 6107 Brooklyn Blvd.
Welcome Home, Inc. 6451 Brooklyn Blvd.
Norman D. Sorensen 5432 Dupont Ave. N.
Roland Scherber 5243 Ewing Ave. N.
Howard Breuninger 5401 Fremont Ave. N.
Roland Scherber 7212 Newton Ave. N.
Dave Bradley 6725 W. River Road
Harshad Bhatt 7206 -7212 W. River Road
Irwin Ketroser 6525, 27, 29 Willow Ln.
Roger & Marie Krawiecki 5209 Xerxes Ave. N.
Bernard & Margaret Gilvin 2901 61st Ave. N.
John DeVries 2936 69th Lane
John DeVries 2937 69th Lane_
Di of Planning
and Inspection
TAXICAB LICENSE
Yellow Taxi Service 127 1st Ave. NE 0 . ± *4aLA , o ice Chie
0 GENERAL APPROVAL:✓
er p i r., Clerk
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
r RESOLUTION NO. ,
RESOLUTION APPROVING PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT COMPRESSOR
s FOR CIVIC CENTER AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM AND APPROPRIATING
FUNDS THEREFORE
WHEREAS, the City Manager has advised: the City Council that one of the
two compressor units which operates the Air Conditioning system for the Civic
Center has failed and recommends replacement of said unit with a rebuilt compressor;
and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has obtained the following quotations for
furnishing and installing such rebuilt compressor
Alaskan Air Conditioning Inc. $ 9,880.00
Cramer Building Services /Twin City
Trane Service Division $ 9,200.00
Palen /Kimball Company $13,942.00
AND, WHEREAS, it appears that the lowest responsible quotation was
submitted by Cramer Building Services /Twin City Trane Service Division:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
E
1. the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed
to enter into contract with Cramer Building Services /Twin City
Trane Service Division in the amount of $9,200.00 for the
furnishing and installation of the required compressor.
2. the Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to transfer
an appropriation of $9,200.00 from the Unallocated Departmental
Expenses Unit (Contingency Account No. 4995) to the Government
Buildings Division (Equipment Repair Account No. 4382) for the
purpose of funding these required repairs.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
i
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.