HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984 05-21 CCP Regular Session CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CI IT OF EROGKLYN CENTER
MAY 21, 1984
7:00 P.m.
1. Call to Order.
2. Roll Cull
3, Invocation
4. Open Forum
5. Approval of Consent Agenda
A!! :l'cU =}:ns listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests,
in Qich event the item will be ronoved from the consent agenda and
considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
*6. Approval of Minutes s - May 7, 1984
7. Resolutions:
*a. Accenting Bid and Approving Contract 1984-D (Lift Station Improvement
Project No. 1981-07, Phase II)
- -:.his contract provides for furnishing a mobile generator to provide
emergency standby poser for eight of the City's nine lift stations.
It is r econr ended the bid of Flaherty Equipment Corporation, in the
amount of $26,989, be accepted.
*b. Accepting lid and Approving Contract 1984-E (Water Main Duprovement
Project No. 1984 --02 and Water Service Repair Project fro. 1984-06)
-This contract provides for installation of water main in Lee and
Major Avenues between 69th and 70th Avenues, and 70th Avenue between
Lee and Major Avenues. The contract also provides for repair of water
services in the City's south industrial Park. it is reconr;iended the
bid of Hayes Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $149,928.75, be
accepted.
*c. Accepting aid and Approving Contract 1984—F ( Evergreen Park/ Area
Improvement Project No. 1984-07, Phase I)
-This contract provides for:
1 Iodification to the Evergreen School Parking Lot
2. Evergreen Park Trail Construction
3. Evergreen Park Soccer Field Fencing
4. Access Modifications to }Mater Supply Wells Nos. 3 and It
It is recommended the bid of Nunn Blacktop, Inc., in the amount of
$70,816.80, be accepted.
*d. Auti orizin , Execution of an Agrooment. with Anoka- Hennepin School
District No. 11 for the Construction and Maintenance of the Expanded
Evergreen Park Elementary School Parking Lot Facility
CITY COUNCIL AGEND[i -2- May 21, 198 1 1
e. Eat ably 2hing City Hall/Community Qontcr Landscaping Improvement
Project No. 1984-12, ph I and Accepting Proposal for Construction
Thy
is reconnended the bid of Quills, Inc. in the amount of $14,836,
be accepted.
f. Establishing City Hall/Community Center Landscaping Improvement
Project No. 1981-12, Phase II and Accepting Proposal for Construction
Thereof m-.nded the bid of Custom Turf Irrigation, Inc. in the
-.It is reco
amount of $9,900, be accepted.
g. Approving Agreement with STS CoDsultants, Ltd. for Soils Engineering
Services Relating to Central Park Plaza Improvement Project No. 1984-
10
-This agresnent provides for soils engineering, including soil borings
and design recommendations, related to the design of the Central Park
Plaza improvements.
"rh. Accepting Work Under Contract 1982-0 (Chlorine/Storage RoaE
Improvement Project No. 1982-27)
• i. Am, e i id i .n g
', the 1984 General Fund Budget to Provide for Wage and Salary
Adjustments
-This item reflects wage adjustments made by collective bargaining
agreements with Public Works and Police Department employees.
• j. Authorizing Replacement of Police Sergeant Position Vacated by the
Retirement of Sergeant Ray Beach
*k. Calling for a Public Hearing on a Proposal for Issuance of Industrial
Development Revenue Bonds under the Minnesota Municipal Industrial
Development Act and Authorizing Publication of a Notice of the Dearing
-This item provides for a public hearing on a proposal to refinance a
previously approved industrial development revenue bond for Brooklyn
Office Crossings for purposes of obtaining permanent financing.
*l. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation for the Dedicated Public
Service of Harold Rossow
10 m. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation for the Dedicated Public
Service of Lloyd Holthus
*n. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation for the Dedicated Public
Service of John Thompson
Iro. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation for the Dedicated Public
Service of Glenn Leiter
In. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation for the Dedicated Public
Service of Ray Beach
*q. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation for the Dedicated Public
Service of Trueman A. Nelson
CITY COUNCIL AGEN - May 21 , 198
r Expresiirvy Recocni I of -ind Apprelciat for the Dedicated Public
'Der
vice ol Warren
*S. Authorizing ti ci
U i er to V;'rite-Off Uncollectible Checks
*t. Authorizinr- the City to 11-ite-Off Uncolloctible Accounts
Receivable
*u. .Authoriz Execution o an Pgreeinent for Loan of Intoxilyzer 5e00
-The intoxilyzer 5000 1s used for evidential breath alcohol tests.
H. Planning; Com itc;-is. (7:30 P.m.)
a. Planning Commis ion iqlplication No. 84011 submitted by 1 Express,
Inc. for site and Uu,".11ding pl,j anti special use permit approval to
remodel and install a d rive - u lane and window at the restaurant at
55 Prooklyn 13oulevard. The P Corrinission recommended approval
of Application Fo. 84011 at its 1'�,,ay 10, 1984 meeting.
9. Public Hearing (8:00 p.m.)
a. Improvement Hearing for Water PTO �'ain Improvement Project V 1934-08 and
Street Improve-lent Project No. 1984-09 (Lyndale Avenue Improvements
between 5J-d and 57th Avenues)
-Notice of the hearing has been published in the official paper and
all property o�,,Tners have been notified by mail.
1. Resolution Ordering Improvemc�nt and Preparation of Plans and
Specifications for Improvement Project Nos. 1984-08, 1984-09 and 10,84-
2. Resolution Approving Agreement with Erkkila & Associates for Landscape
Architecture Services Relating to Street Improvement Project No. 1984-
CD
09
-This agreement provides for design of street3cape improvements along
.Lyndale Avenue between 53rd and 57 Avenues.
10. Public Hearing (8:30 P-111.)
-Public Hearing Regarding Contested Compliance Order Involving Chippewa
Park Apartments
11. Consideration of Specified License: On Sale Beer License for the Pizza
Factory located at 6316 Humboldt Avenue North
12. Gambling License Applications:
a. Application for a Class A Gambling License from St. Alphonsus Rosary
Altar Society
b. Application for a Class B Garbling License from St. Alphonsus Men's
Club
c. Application for a Class B Gambling License from St. Alphonsus Church
d. Application for a Class B Gambling License from Brooklyn Center
American Little League
-Approval of gambling licenses requires a majority vote of the City
Council to pass.
-Waiver of the $10,000 fidelity bond requires a unanimous vote of the
City Council- to pass.
*13. Licenses
11-1. Adjournment
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
MAY 7, 1984
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by
Mayor Dean Ilyquist at 7:03 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Finance Paul
Holmlund, Director of Planning & Inspection Ron Warren, City Attorney Richard
Schieffer, and Administrative Assistants Brad Hoffman and Tom Bublitz.
INVOCATIO
The invocation was offered by Pastor Cal Merritt of Brooklyn Center Baptist Church.
OPEN FORUM
Mayor Nyquist noted the Council had not received any requests to use the Open Forum
session this evening. He inquired if there was anyone present who wished to address
the Council. There being none, he continued with the regular agenda items.
CONSENT AG ENDA
Mayor Nyquist inquired if any Council members requested any items removed from the
Consent Agenda. Councilmember Hawes requested item '10 be removed from the Consent
Agenda.
APPROVAL OF' 1 - APRIL 23, 1984
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve the minutes of the City Council meeting of April 23, 1984 as submitted.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEEK OF MAY 6, 1984 AS SMALL BUSINESS WEEK IN BROOKLYN
CEN TER
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve a Proclamation Declaring the Week of May 6, 1984 as Small Business Meek in
Brooklyn Center. Voting in favor: 1ayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott,
Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
RENEWAL OF LICENSE TO UTILI EXPLOSIVES FOR HOWE, INC.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve the license to utilize explosives for Howe, Inc., subject to the following
conditions:
1. The permit is issued to Howe, Inc., 4821 Xerxes Avenue North,
Brooklyn Center and is nontransferable.
. 2. Howe, Inc. shall continue to use a two component compound, kinestik,
or a similar two component compound.
5 -y -84 -1-
3. Howe, Inc. shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local
legislation governing the transportation, storage, handling and
detonation of explosives.
I4. Howe, Inc, shall notify the Chief of Police in advance of all
blasting A
operations.
5. City employees shall have the right to inspect upon reasonable
notice given to Howe, Inc.
6. Authorization to discharge explosives in the City of Brooklyn
Center granted under this permit shall expire May 9, 1985.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
RESOLU
RESOLUTION N0, 84
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR YEAR X URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTALL
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Rich Theis, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis. Voting
against: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 84--69
Iember Gene Lhotka introduced the following esolution and moped its adop
g p
RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE ACHIEVEMENT OF JERILEE MAYER
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Rich Theis, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis. Voting
against: ainst: none whereupon said eu paid re.�olution was declared dal passed and � Po Y adopted.
P p
LICENSES
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve the following list of licenses:
FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
Brookdale Mobil 5710 Xerxes Ave. N.
Brooklyn Center Babe Ruth 6LI06 Noble Ave. N.
Evergreen Park 7112 Bryant Ave. N.
Grandview Park 1600 59th Ave. N.
Chuck's Q. 1505 69th Ave. N.
Korean Presbryterian Church 6830 Quail Ave. N.
T. Wrights 5800 Shingle Cr. Pkwy.
I TINER ANT FOOD E STABLISH MENT LICEN
Garden City School �^ 3501 65th Ave. N.
5 -7 -III -2-
MECHA „I SYSTEMS LICENSE
_56T�f:r 1971 Seneca Rd.
Commercial tir Conditioning 2200 Niagara Lane
Conservenergy Systems, Inc. 6505 Taft Street
Dependable 1 1 , 12-ating & Air Cond. 2615 Coon Rapids Blvd.
OlVeefe Mechanical 7188 Shady Oak Rd.
Riccar Heating 3095 102nd Ln. NW
St. Marie Sheet Pietal 7940 Spring Lk. Pk Blvd.
SIG;' HANGERS LICENSE
1 ”
,ordquist Sign Company, Inc. 312 W. Lake Street
Signcrafters Outdoor Display, Inc. 7775 Main St. NE
SWT_. POOL LICENSE
Columbus Village Apts. 507 70th Ave. N.
Grecian Health Spa 2820 County Rd. 10
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilinembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION'S (CONTINUED)
The City Manage . r introduced a Resolution Accepting Quotations and Authorizing
Purchase of Soccer /Footbal Goals. He pointed out that the bid from Tennis West
Ltd. is being recommended since the structure of the goals is sturdier than the other
two bids submitted.
Councilmember Lhotka inquired as to the type of material used in the goals
recommended by staff. The City Manager explained that the goals were made of
galvanized metal and in the opinion of the staf were a superior product to the other
bids submitted.
RESOLUTION 1 84-70
_Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTATIONS AND AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF SOCCER/FOOTBALL GOALS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Bill Hawes and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof
Dean Nyquist, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis. Voting against: Gene
Lhotka. The motion passed.
ANIMAL IMPO=UND CONTRACT
There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to
approve the agreement, between the City of Brooklyn Center and the Funk Animal
Hospital. for animal impound set-vices. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist,
Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The
motion passed unanimously.
1
APPOINTMENT TO HUMAN RIGHTS Colj,1i1-SSTON
Mayor Nyquisf. the nppoin'L Wiest of Evelyn Misfeldt, 5611 Jatnes Avenue North,
0 to the Brooklyn Center Human Rights Commi:;,sion.
5-7-84 --3-
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
approve the appointment of Evelyn Misfeldt, 5611 James Avenue North, to the Prooklyn
Center E4uman Rights Commission to complete the unexpired term of Corr;lissioner
Yencho which expires on December 31, 1984. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist,
Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The
motion passed unanimously.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
REVIEW OF' DEVELOPNENT PROPOS FOR OLD CITY HALL SITE
The City Manager explained this item was tabled at the April 23, 1984 meeting and
developers were requested to submit additional information concerning their
proposals. The City Manager then reviewed the actions required by the City Council
to complete the sale of the old City Hall property. He pointed out the first action
is to reject to all purchase agreements in effect with the three developers, and the
second action would be to accept the submittal from the developer and execute the
sale of the property at the second reading of the ordinance.
Administrative Assistant Hoffman outlined the procedure and explained the Council
would select the developer, the developer would then sign a purchase agreement and a
public hearing would be held.
There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
reject any and all purchase agreements presently in effect for the purchase of the
old City Hall property located at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard. Voting in favor: Mayor
Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none.
The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Nyquist invited the developers present at the meeting to submit any additional
information they might have regarding their proposals.
Mr. Nelson, representing Partners in Progress, presented a site plan to the City
Council which included an elevation and also showed a possible color scheme for the
building, including the exterior treatments for the building.
Mayor Nyquist then recognized the representative from Edina Realty who reviewed his
firms site plan and discussed the landscaping, tenancy, and other building
features.
Mayor Nyquist recognized Mr. Rick Hartman, of H. E. Hcmes who stated that the purpose
of acquiring the additional property adjacent to the old City Hall site was to
maintain a one -story office design as opposed to a two -story building.
Councilmember Lhotka thanked all three developers for submitting their proposals
and stated that all three are quality projects. He stated that, with the additional
information provided by the developers, he believed that the best proposal was
submitted by Partners in Progress.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
request Partners in Progress to submit an offer to the City of Brooklyn Center for
the purchase of the old City hall property at 7100 Brooklyn Boulevard.
In discussion of the motion, Councilmember Theis expressed a concern with the
building design noting that it was a very distinctive type building, and that tie did
5 --7 -84 -4-
not know if the deveIoPlentooBrooklyn PouImard willbe able to complement the
buildinQ. lie stated that be had some reCervati0no about the style 0f the building.
Council Hawes stated lie believed the distinctive design of the building would
be an usoct to the area.
CoUnoilmcmber Scott stated that, Originally she had nconoero about the appearance
of the building proposed by Partners, in Pro� but with the submission of' the
additional information by tbe deveIoper her rcxervatioou about the building design
were reo0lved.
Upon a vote being taken ou the motion, the folIcwingvot8d in favor thereof: Voting
infavor: Yfayor0yguiot, CounoiImembCroI.botka. Scott, Hawes, arid Theis. Voting
�
against: 000S. The mo'Gioo passed unanimously.
There was amotiou by CouooiImember Scott arid seconded by CouDciIm8mber Theis to
approve for first reading An Ordinance Authorizing the Conveyance of' Real Estate in
the City of Brooklyn Center. Voting in favor Mayor 0ygUiot, C0000iImembero
Lbotka, Scott, [lsweJ, arid Theis. Voting a8ainot: none. The motion passed
unanimously.
CO08IDER&TZO@ OF CHANGE IN ADMINISTDAII�E O�FZCF B0UB3
The - -- -------- ------- �
City8 u
aoo��rr8vzewc�U�o�emorao�nzregerdiogtbapropooe d change O fCity Hall
office bnuru. He noted that ourrGnt City Hall office 'hours are from 8:OOa,m. to
5�.00p,m., and the proposed change would be to change the hours to 8:00 a.m. to 4 :30
p.m. lie reviewed t'Yaere8omno for the change noting that observation has sbo*othat
very little business has come into City Hall. after 4;30 p.m., and that by changing
the office hours so that all employees are on m uniform schedule, as opposed to
staggered hours, it would eliminate the problems rising from a staggered workday
schedule.
The Council discussed the proposed obaugo in office hours and CououiIm8mbor Scott
commented that she had experienced a delay as Ioug as 15 rings before the City Hall
phone was answered. The City Nlana3er stated that lie would find out if there in o
problem. Administrative Assistant BubIitz noted that the problem may be that all
ioomniug, lines are occupied on the switchboard and that oo busy signal i3 sent onthe
liue.
Mayor Qyguiot suggested looking into tbe possibility ofhaving a recorded message
installed stating that all the incoming lines are full.
There was amotion by C0UnoiImenber Scott and seconded by CnunoiImemher Hawes to
approve the change in City Hall of fine hours from 8: 00 a.m. to 5: 00 p.m. to 8:O0 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m. effective on July 5, 1984,
In discussion of the motion, Councilmeober Theis requested that any input, from
individuaIn wl/omaybave problems with the change in office hours be reported to the
City Council.
Upon o vote being taken on the motion, the following voted in favor thereof; Voting
in favor: �|8yor0yguist, CouociIme/ohero Lbotko, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting
again-t-, none. The motion passed unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF' 2UMM�B Z0T�DN FOB CITY M&N��ED`� OFFICE
The City lVarizger explained that his proposal. to --------------- h ner intern for the City
5-7-84 -5-
' ~
� Manager's office would be to address some specific project areas, including
preparation of an employee handbook oVotaiuingr man�c;ement rules and practices,
procedures, etc., preparation oil a public information handbook for general
distribution, research on data practices and records retention for City
departments, and also microf"iImiog research related to development of 8
comprehensive microfilming program for the City offices. He noted that current
work load in the City Administrative offices has not permitted the accomplishment of
these specific project areas, and that the intern would be primarily assigned to
complete these projects. fie added that the 'fUodO ƒbr the intern would come from the
�
professional services account in the 1984 City Council budget and that the going
� rate for interns is between $6.50 and $8.00 an hour. He also noted that the
internship 1s proposed for a three month period beginning in June.
There was a motion by COUooiImember Theis and seconded by C0UooiImemh6r Lh-otk8 to
approve the hiring of an intern for the City Manager's office for a three month
period and also approving asalary range for the intern of $6.50 to $8.00 per hour.
Voting in favor: Mayor 0yguist, Couocilmembera LhVtka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: nooe. The motion passed unanimously.
�
RETIREMENT OF LIQUOR 3IO8E3 WAGER Ibe� --
� City Nao@ger noted that tbe current City Liquor Stores Manager is retiring on
June l. He explained the staff is r8oVnm8udiug that the position be recruited for
internally only at this point, and inquired whether the Council had any problem with
this process as proposed.
COunoilm8mber Theis stated be would like to see something on tbe �
applicant's, such as a work history or resume.
�N0�r
The City IManeger stated he would provide this ioƒhruatiuD and that if' no candidates
� are acceptable tV the Council, lie would recruit from outside the City work force.
� &D�OD8NTMENI
1 e was emotiOo by COuDoilNember Ihmtka and seconded byCouooiImember Scott to
adjourn the meeting. Voting in favor: Mayor 0 yguist, CounoiImemb8r3 Lhotka
Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 7:58 p.m.
Deputy City Clerk
ayor
�
�
�
`
�
| 5-7-84 -6_
i lit YCI(hjced the following resolution and
moved its adol)t j o
RE'-SOLUTION No.
CONili'l 1984
ACCEPTINC
7 N) r',J]
STATION !,,10. 19'33-07, PHASE II)
v pursuant to an advertlsr-ff for bids for Improvement Project
No. 1983-09, Phase II, bids were received, opened, and tabulated by the City
Clerk and City Engineer, on the 17th day of May, 1-984. Said bids were as follows:
Bidder Bid Amount Delivery
Flaherty Equipment Corporation $26,989.00 90 Days
Cummins Diesel Sales, Inc. 30,035.00 120 Days
Interstate Detroit Diesel Allison 31,140.00 150 Days
Ziegler, Inc. 32,958.00 150 Days
WHEREAS, it appears that Flaherty Equipment Corp. of Minneapolis, MN.
is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed
to enter into the attached contract in the amount of $26,989.00
with Flaherty Equipment Corporation of Minneapolis, MN in the
name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project No.
1983-09, Phase !I, according to the plans and specificiat-Jons
therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forth-
with to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except
that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest
bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
i
CITY
OF 6301 SI- flNGL-[, CREEK PARKWAY
j ti20C?KL_Yftl CEN P✓iiNNi SC)T� 5
TELEPHONE 5610440
i EMERGENCY — POLICE
911
TO: Gera G. Splinter., City Manager.
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DAVE: May 18, 1984
RE: Review of Bids Received - Contract 1984 -D
(Furnishing Mobile Cenerator Under Imp.
Proj. No. 1983 -07, Phase II)
Pursuant to City Council authorization, staff has taken bids for the
furnishing of a mobile generator to provide emergency standby power
for eight of the City's nine sanitary sewer lift stations. The lowest
responsible bid, in the amount of $26,989_CO, has been submitted by
Flaherty Equipment Corporation and provides for the furnishing of an
I Onan 125 TW generator. The City's consultant:, Orr- Schelen- Mayeron &
Assoc., certifies that the proposed generator meets the equipment
specifications,
It is recommended that the bid of Flaherty Equipment Corp. be accepted
by the City Council.
Sy Knai
SK:ps
i
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLL" I'I ON NO.
ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTPACT 1984 -1? (WATER MAIN
Z i7't011 `�' PROJECT NO. 1�)' -02 1:'aD WATER SE;RVI:CE REPAIR
PROJECT }QO. 1-984-06)
t°IHER}AS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Projects
Nos. 1934 -02 and 1984 -06, bids were r.cceived, opened, and tabulated by the City
Clerk and City Engineer, on the 17th clay of May, 1984. Said bids were as
follows:
Bidder Bi Amount
Hayes Contractors, Inc. $149,928.75
Bur_schvi.11e Construction, Inc. $183,027.65
Northdale Construction Co., Inc. $206,198.50
WHEREAS, it appears that Hayes Contractors, Inc. of Minneapolis,
Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota:
1. The Mayor and City :tanager are hereby authorized and directed to
enter into the attached contract, in the amount of $149,928.75,
with Hayes Contractors, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota in the
name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project
Nos. 1984 -02 and 1984 - -06 according to the plans and specifications
therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall
be retained until a contract has been signed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:
1. The estimated total cost of Improvement Projects Nos. 1984 -02
and 1984 -06 are hereby amended according to the following schedule:
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1984 -02
As Approved As Bid
Contract Cost $78,21.0.00 $72,247.75
Engineering Cost 7,040.00 6,502.30
Administrative Cost 780.00 722.48
Legal Cost 780.00 722.48
Capitalized Interest 10, 8,669.73
TOTAL $97,230.00 $88,864.74
RESOLUTION NO.
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1984 -06
As A As Bid
Contract Cost $71,510.00 $77,681.00
Engineering Cost 6,440.00 6,991.29
Administrative Cost 720.00 _ 776.81
TOTAL $78,670.00 $85,449.10
2. The Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to
appropriate an additional $6,779.10 from the Public Utilities
Fund for additional costs related to Improvement Project No.
1984 -06.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:.
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said .resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY
Gf- 6301 SHINGLE CRE F'K FtAR °`VVAY
.. E f'R00i I.YN CEN_ E , MINf`\1E - rn.
A ....
TELEf'r1J�tic 561 -5/140
N
r >
< f.MF.RGFJ% FOE_ICE: TIRE=
911
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public ti,'o
DATE: r 17, 1984
RE: Review of Bids Recei - Contract 1984 -E
(Seater Main Improvement Project No. 1.984- -02;
Water Service Repair Project No. 1.984 -06)
Pursuant to City Council authorization, staff has received bids for
the installation of hater main along Lee and Major Avenues between
69th and 70th Avenues and along 7001 Avenue, between Lee and Major
Avenues. Also included in the contract is the repair of water service
extensions within. the Citv's south industrial park. The lowest
responsible bid was submitted_ Hayes Contractors, Inc., a firm that
has successfully completed many water main installation projects within
the City in the last two years. Accordingly, staff recommends the
City Council accept the proposal of Hayes Contractors, Inc. to complete
the wort: contemplated under Contract 1984 -E.
Ana lysis of L Bid.
An anal- ~sis of the Hayes Contractors, Inc. bid reveals that the contract
cost for Improvement: Project No. 1984 -02 was $72,247.75, whereas the
estimated cost was $78,210.00. A comparison of the costs for Improvement
Project No. 1984 -06 reveals that the contract cost was $77,681.00 and
the estimated cost was $71,510.00. As a result, the total contract
cost of $149,928.75 exceeded the total estimated cost of $149,720.00
by $208.75.
The increase in total contract cost will be financed by an appropriation
from the Public Utilities Fund. Therefore, no change in the proposed
assessment rate for Improvement Project No. 1984 -02 is contemplated.
5K: )11
n
i it S rif #.' tf 114 0 1 1C
� F
1
7e,
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
ACCEPTING BID AND T.PPROVIN.; CON ;' ACT 1984 -F (EVEI:GREEN
pAI2YyT.}'::ii ? i :0`J i" P %J?.C`I' 1':'i. 19 -07, PIi SE I)
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertise :meat for bids for Improvement Project
'No. 1984 -07, Phase I, bids were received, cy?ened, and tabulated by the City
Clerk and Laity Engi.ncer, on the 17th day of May, 1984. Said bids were as follows:
Bid Bid Amount
Munn Blacktop, Inc. $ 74,816.80*
Bituminous Roadway, Inc. 90,687.01*
Barber Construction Company, Inc. 92,324.40
Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. 95,126.30
Bury & Carlson, Inc. 106,203.04
Har_drives, Inc. 1.09,381.40
Preferred Paving, Inc. 127,337.10
Orvedahl Construction Company 133,626.00
*Denotes Engineer's Correction Upon Extension
WHEREAS, it appears that Munn Blacktop, Inc. of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City
of Brooklyn Center, i that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager_ are hereby authorized and directed to
enter into the attached contract, in the amount of $74,816.80
with Munn Blacktop, Inc. of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement
Project No. 1984 -07, Phase I according to the plans and specifications
therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return
forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids,
except that the deposit of the successful bidder and the next
lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been
signed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:
1. The estimated total cost of Improvement Project No. 1984 -07,
Phase I is revised according to the following schedule:
As Approved As Bid
Contract Cost $126,580.00 $ 74,816.40
Engineering Cost 11,390.00 6,773.48
Administrative Cost 1,270.00 748.16
. Legal Cost 70.00 70.00
Capitalized Interest 810.0 810.0
TOTAL $140,120.00 $ 83,218.04
RE' SOLU 'Il 0 1 1 1 NO.
C,__._.___ Mayor.
ATTEST: _
Cierk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
i
CITY ,
... 0 F
t. lt�'�l)4.1..Y�iW Ef�iTL , I,It N 1` ` OT 57.1i1
r
r�
TELEPHONE 5r1 -I.5 40
RGENCY FIRE
, .. 1
i
r
l
TO Gerald G. Splinter, City
FRONT: Sy Knapp, D- rector. of Public 'NOr':s,
DATE: May 18, 1984
R, Review of Bids Received - Contract 1984 - -I,
(Evergreen Park /Area Improvement Project
No. 1984• -07, Phase 1)
Pursuant to City Council authorization, staff has taken bids for the first
phase of improvements to the Evergreen Par.'. /Area under Project 1984 -07.
Improvements contemplated under this contract include:
1. Modifications to the Evergreen School Parking Lot
2. Evergreen Park Trail Construction
3. Evergreen Park Soccer Field Fencing
4. Access Modifications to G.dater Supply I-7ells Nos. 3 and 4
Staff review of the submitted bids reveals that the lo responsible
bidder is Munn Blacktop, Inc. A summary of the inter.TJ.ews of the provided
_references follows:
Cit of Roseville (David Drown - City Engineer)
The contractor completed construction of a 3 mile trail system within the City
in 1983. work was completed in a timely, responsible manner and the contractor
worked << with City personnel.
C ity o f Coo Rapi (Doug Vierzba - Assistant City P.rngineer)
The contractor completed street. and trail paving project in 1982. Again,
work was completed in a timely, responsible manner_. The contractor's rapport
with the City employees was excellent.
� 6f
Merrlor I'!" - him, to (Wrald Q. splinter, N i Y W qvr
May 14, 1984
Re: keviuw of Bids Received - ContracL 1044-l'
Page 7two
Cit , Of --- Ne - w -- R ri - qb - ton (Les Proper - City !Yuineer)
The contractor completed construction of the qo1f course parking lot in 1983.
The City considered the work to be excellent and it was completed in a timely
manner. The City was very pleased with tke contractor's work.
Based upon the information provided, stagy reco-mends the City Council award
a contract to Munn Blacktop, Inc. for the work conterplated under Project
1984-07, Phase I.
y Knapp
SK:ps
10
Memb , in+_.ro duc�!d the following resolution and
rOW� d its adoption:
RE' SOLUP1011 IIO --
Ri,5O1: �PIO,d R?J`l.'iIORI.�IN�. hi:I Cli170i° OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ANOKA-
Ht,i: ?', S' 11001., I?7 :'ETC' PJO. 11 `")P 1 11 , 11 : : `1Eii: CONSTRUCTION AND
iA .1 NANCE 0" Till; T ",XPAN'1I,L,D EVI R-EEIV PARtC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
PARK i'r LC FACILITY
WHE RFITT'�S, the City Counci_I and imoka-- Hennepin School District No. 11
ackno- .7ledge U)at it is in the best intcre�__.s of the City and School District
to provide for the expansion of the Evergrc -en Park Elementary School parking
lot and relocation of the access drive thereto:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 'RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The attached agreement providing for the improvement, use, and
maintenance of the Evergreen Park Elementary School parking lot
is hereby approved.
2. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed
to execute said agreement.
Date _ Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
C i 1'Y
(�F 6301 5!!I,` C: I F C liE_f-K PAR 1%V',U', xf
a tr i 'If 0 "')!<LYCv C;F-N FLR, iA;l( N['SC:TA
L_ 561-54
� �� •r r -� - ; II , ! C .
a
q y
s
i
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public korks
DAT L : 1' 17 1984
RE: Agreement lVith Anoka - Hennepin School District for Access,
Use, and - Maintenance, of the Evergreen Park Elementary School
Parking Lot Facility
Pursuant to City Council authorization, staff_ has negotiated an
agreement with the Anoka- I- iennepin School District for the joint
use of the Evergreen Park Elementaary School parking lot facili
This agreement provides cross easements for access to the facility
by both the City and School. District. In addition, the agreement
provides for School District pa) of one half the estimated cost
of the relocated access construction. Maintenance costs for upkeep
of the facility , be shared insofar as the City will be responsible
for costs incurred on its property and the School District will be
responsible for costs incurred on its property. However, the School
District will be responsible for snow removal over the entire facility.
It is recommended that the City Council approve said agreement, and
a resolution directing the Mayor and City Manager is attached.
Sv Ian ar -j
SK: in
1) C I,A P 01- C()%TNANt'S AM) EA.Si:,'
1 (V !'R I IC 0N AND MAINTT\'VNCF M
SCHOOL PARKING LOT EXPAN'SlGN
TH) S V made th i s 21 st day of Play, 1984 by and
between the School District No. 11, hereinafter
referred to as the
D i s t r i c t" , and the C i t y of Broo I, I yn
Center, IMinncsot , i , hereinafter referred to as t h o City.
WHEREAS, the City is in the process of improving access
to, and expanding t 11 c size of, the Evergreen Park Elementary School
parking lot; and
1HI'RFAS, it is required that the School District provide
the City with an caso,l.ient for ingress, egress, parking, and drainage
j.n conjunction with the referenced improvements; and
WHITEAS, it is required that the City provide the School
District with an casement for ingress, egress, parking, and drainage
in conjunction with the referenced improvements.
N011`, 1'JIEIUT0;tE, BI IT AGREED that:
1. The School District does hereby create, for the benefit
of the City the following easement: :
A perpetual nonexclusive easement for ingress and egress
on, over, and across that property described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 50, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 309, thence east 33 feet, thence south
parallel with the west -Iinc thereof 528.5 feet, thence
cast a distance of 98.1. feet to the actual point of
beginning of the property to be described: thence
C0ntiIILIJn( oast a distance of 35 feet, thence south
parallel with said west line a distance of 1.01.5 feet,
thence west a distance of 35 feet, thence north parallel
with said west line a distance of 101.5 feet, to the
point of beginning, according to the plat of record. thereof,
files of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
2. The City does hereby create, for the benefit of the
School District the following easement:
A perpetual nonexclusive easement for ingress and egress
follows: on, over, and across the property described as follows:
Lepinning at the Northwest corner of Lot 50, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 309, thence south along the west line of
Lot 50, a distance of 680 feet, thence cast at right
angles to the above described line a distance of 33 feet
to the actual point of beginning of the property to be
described: ti continuing cast a distance of 133
feet, thence north parallel with said west line, a distance
of SO feet, t",ence west a distance of 133 feet to a point
33 feet cast of a point on the west l ine of Lot 50, 630
feet south of the northwcst corner thereof, thence South
pa r.i I I c I with said west lot line a distance of SO feet
to the point of beginning, according to the plat of
record theren fi of the Count) Recorder, 'Hennepin
County, Ninn< ,-,,Ota,
3 The Sc17oo1 iii s s 1 1 'I I re imburse t ]1 C i t y 3 7
� 9 ) . 0 0
c 1 h , re;1r gen one ha I f t he e s t i m a t e d t cost of tile
lot access relocation, sajd payment to
made it il ill o receipt of Brooklyn Center
a ;i ce t1pon project completi
4. Lac Ii of the a e ;cmejit areas shall be maintained
at the expense of the I)l'operty ol"'ller.
BF, VJ' Fifl,'111i'l? AGRLED 'I"HAT:
I. The School Di�trjct autliori,'cs the City to expand the
existin P—king lot facil i ties at tile. E'vergreon Park
Element School in accordance with the attached Exhibit
A, ;ill costs related to said expansion to be borne by the
City.
2. The School District shall be responsible, for maintenance
of that portion of the expanded parking lot wbich lies on
the School District property.
3. The City shall be responsible for maintenance of that
port of E lie oxpanded parking lot which lies on City
propert\ .
4 . The School District shall be responsible for snow - removal
operations over the entire parking lot site, all at no
cost to the City.
S. The aforesai d easements, and the benefits and obligations
thereof, shall be perpetual and shall annex to and run
with the land herein described.
IN 1 MIEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
declaration on the day and year indicated below.
ANOKA-HENNEPIN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. Il CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Thomas 1"Orgstedt, Mayor Dean Nyquist
Operations /Facilities Director
Dated: Dated:
Gerald. G. Splinter,
City Manager
Dated:
Subscribed and sworn to before me Subscribed and sworn to before me
this -- day of 1984. this day of 1984.
Notary Public Notary Public
I _
F RO M S Qom+ p (^ i � _ Y �
{_ i I I I ��• \ \\ 1
1
(,Tr wE 1 EASEMENT FRO V� �� � �C � � ��� �00L �s.�
membar introduced the following r(-�solution and
moved its adolmion:
RESOLUTION NO.
FIESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CTTY F i'.,_. %C'C)r "U NI TY CENTER LhNDSCAPIN(.
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1984-12, PHASE I AND ACCEPTING PROPOSAL
!DR CONSTP �CTIQN THEREOT
WITREAS, the City Council considers it to be in the best interests
of the City to provide for the completion of landscaping improvements at the
City Hall/Community Center complex; and
WHETTAS, the City Engineer has received proposals for the installation
of plantings at the City Hall/Community Center complex, said proposals as follows:
Bidder Proposal
Buoll's, Inc. $14,836.00
Minnesota Tree, Inc. $17,799.15*
*Donates Engineer's Correction Upon Extension
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has advised the City Council that the
proposal of Bnell's, Inc., in the amount of $14,836.00, is the lowest responsible
proposal received and has recommended that a contract be awarded to said firm
in that amount.
NOW, THEPEVORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the city of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The proposed improvement shall be established as follows:
CITY HALL/C01•2 CENTER LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 1984-12, PHASE I
2. The proposal of Buell's, Inc., in the amount of $14,836.00, is hereby
accepted. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into a contract with said firm in that amount.
3. The total cost of said project is estimated as follows:
Contract Cost $14,836.00
Engineering Cost
Staff 1,335.24
Consultant 1,320.00
Administrative Cost 148.36
TOTAL $17,639.60
4. The accounting for Improvement Project No. 1984-12, Phase I will
be done in the Capital Projects Fund (Division 57).
Date Mayor
ATTES*,T:
Clerk-
T= -ZOO 7TION NO.
�ihe motion for the adoption of thc- _foreqoirs} resolution was duly seconded by
member. and a on vc)t -e be _nc, taken thoreon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Men introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RE soh'u `1 "4 1d0. .T _
RESOT UZ'IO -1 ESTABLISHING CITY 11ALL /C0�24IUNITY CENTER LANDSCAPING
d P ROJECT N0. 1904-12, PHASE IT AND ACCEPTING PROPOSAL
FOR CONSTT)!=ION T11FREOF
WHEREAS, the City Council considers it to be in the best interests
of the City to provide for the con1pletion of landscaping improvements at the
City Hall /Community Center complex; and
WEE'REAS, 'L City Engineer has received proposals for the installation
of a lawn irrigation system at the City Hall /Community Center complex, said
proposals as follows:
Bidder Propo
AAA Irrigation Company, Inc. $ 9,484.00
Custom Turf Irrigation, Inc. $ 9,900.00*
Aqua City Irrigation $13,500.00
*Denotes Engineer's Correction Upon Extension
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has advised the City Council that the
proposal of Custom Turf Irrigation in the amount of $9,900.00, is the lowest
responsible proposal received and has recommended that a contract be awarded
to said firm in that amount.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The proposed improvement shall be established as follows:
CITY" HALL /COMMUNITY CENTER LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1984 -12, PHASE II
2. The proposal of AAA Irrigation Company, Inc. in the amount of
$9,484.00 is hereby rejected on the basis of the City Engineer's
determination that the materials which said company proposes to
use do not meet the minimum standards established by the
specifications.
3. The proposal of Custom Tirf Irrigation, Inc. in the amount of
$9,900.00 is hereby accepted. The Mayor and City Manager are
hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with
said firm in that amount.
4. The total cost of said project is estimated according to the
following schedule:
Contract Cost $ 9,900.00
Engineering Cost 891.00
Administrative Cost 99.0
TOTAL $10,890.00
5. The accounting for Improvement Project No. 1.984 -12, Phase II will
Lx done -in the C:. z >it:at T x_t jc.ct Fiend (Division 57).
RJ�SOLiTTO�� P�C�.
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
C:1 Y
C)1
6301 S H I I\ G L E C H 1 K p fld_I K WIrA y
1 C=,0O IY `1 1 I FH, I',iIN( ° FA 1� - ;.,
1 EI_EPHOINIL ` 61 -G,440
911
T0: Gerald G. Splinter, City ?Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public tiVorks
DATE: May 17, 1.98
RE: Landscaping of City Ha] I /Community Center
At your request staff has solicited proposals for the continuation
of City Hall /Community Center landscape improvements begun in 1980
with the relocation of the complex' main access at Shingle Creek
Parkway, The proposed improvements provide for the installation of
plantings along the complex' upper plaza and adjacent to the
Con.munity Center and C ty Hall at the access to their respective lots.
Also included is the installation of an automatic lawn irrigation
which will serve the landscaped areas easterly of the complex between
+ the access drives to Shingle Creek Parkway. The attached maps show
(1) the areas -in which landscaping is proposed and. (2) the area proposed
to be covered by the now irrigation system. Detailed plans will be
available at the City Council meeting.
Attached herewith are resolutions which provide for the installation
of planting materials and the lawn irrigation system in. accordance
with contract documents drawn. by Erkkila and Associates (landscape
architects) and the City. The resolution pertaining to the installation
of planting materials awards a contract to Buell's Inc., a reputable
firm with which Erkkila � Associates has had many dealings. The
resolution pertaining to the installation of the lawn irrigation system
provides for contract award to the second low bidder, since the materials
proposed for use by the low bidder do not meet the minimum material
specifications for the project.
The City has had. limited contact with the second low bidder and the
firm's work is considered acceptable. An interview of references,
supplied by the contractor, all indicate that the firm is reputable
and capable of completing the work.
It is proposed that financing for the improvements be provided from
Capital Projects Fund, Division :pro. 57, (established for improvement
Of the City Hall /Comintni Center access).
See attached memo from Paul Holm1und regarding the current balance
in that account. �
5 y�
rrr� j � •.
Jh JIZ
. f _
i^ e
,J1TY pEpjT €�'
J r
r
w
1 ; ! ,� --- ,, - __;�`� � 1 � •.% _C1;_ _- _- ---- -- - t'w
.: H
CREEK rc `�
Fll
i
li r-t'JT
a � F rj/ Y n
.+ t
7
AE
-- S y
�A£i i 'i
y
AREA O
'tom ' G
AREA �-_--
AREA 2 -
�
- - --- " RKVIAY
(SOLI yBS
-
--''' AREA 9 ___ -= -- - —. CREEK
S i-I N r
r' ✓A Y (f�!ORTN, BOJN:�1
~
`�- � E G �K PA ,q�,
PE
- - - _�
r
�' R A A-
^-
�_
Pk
, I
CITY
Q
(P
`a, r.� � 1_.. r._s '.>t,,! C f +€` n P. f•° ,€e a Y 4�' �` � � ,�j
z UV
TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
FROM: Director of Finance
DATE: May 17, 1984
SUBJECT: CIVIC CENTER ACCESS PROJECT NO. 57
The March 31., 1984 Project Analysis of Civic Center Access Project No. 57
shows + � -.+
that the project was $22,054 un der budget an that da Be advised
_ J
that I have since made an additional appr_opr_iation of $50,135 to the
Project, which will result in the project being $72,189 un budget at
March 31, 1984. .
The additional appropriation is the 1982 General Fund share of the project
cost, which had been transferred to the Capital Projects Fund in 1982 but
had not yet been allocated to the project.
Paul W. Holmlund
PWH:ps
Member intro3wced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION N'0.
RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT W= STS CONSULTANTS, LTD.
FOR SOILS t N IN E; r' ,.N IJ LT 1 IAd TO CE" PA'. I'
PROJECT NO. 1984-10
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, that the proposal submitted by STS Consultants Ltd. to provide Soils
Engineering Services related to the design of Central Park Plaza Improvement
Project No. 1984-10, at an estimated cost of $ 3,400.00 is hereby accepted.
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
contract with STS Consultants Ltd. for said services.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CCTy
J 1 1 it 'ti_�i E CR P t K Y
Bf7CJut (.. t C.f=i1�f r�, MlNINE.SOTA 5 64', : ,
J- x. I t _ r -
! TELLS. -T ONE P-61 - 5440
E ;;'E ! >z_N�' C - F'O�_IC_ -- r (F;E
TO Gerald G. Splinter, City 1Ianager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public 11"orl
DATE: May 17, 1954
RE: Contract for Soils Engineering Services for Central Park Plaza
Improvements
- } t rl. P
}�n conjunction with the des' of the Central Pal
li. Plaza improvements,
design n t� .
J g
staff recommends the City secure the services of a soils engineering
firm for the analysis of subsurface soil. conditions within the plaza
area. Said analysis will provide needed information for the design.
of the pond (i.e. seater supply, stability of exposed and immersed
slopes, water quality, etc.), design of foundation structures for
flag poles, the shot, mobile pad, and relocated access drive and
bituminous trails. Accordingly, staff has negotiated with STS Consultants,
Ltd. for the completion of said subsurface soils exploration and the
furnishing of necessary design recommendations that will assist Brauer
F, Associates Ltd. in the design of the various aspects of the Central
Park Plaza improvements.
We recommend that said agreement be approved. A resolution providing
said approval is submitted for consideration by the City Council.
Sy Knar;IV,
f°
SK: jn
t'
t
q'A
STS Consultants Ltd.
2405 t1- i ;ac is We
tJtinnosota 55441
(612) 559 -1900
Vay 18, 1984
Mr. James Grube
City of Brookiyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
RE: PROPOSAL FOR GEOTEC ill i CAL ENGINEERING SERVICES AND SUBSURFACE
EXPLORATION FOR THE PROPOSED CIVIC CENTER PLAZA SITE ! MPROVEMEN`l S
Dear Mr. Grube:
As was discussed in our meeting of May 10, 1984, we are pleased to have
this opportunity to submit our proposal for providing g'eotechnical
cnginvering and subsurface explorstin services for the above referenced
project. We understand that the imprpvements are to consist of the
construction of a plaza area including a reflecting pond, ar'hor, and
patio with various asphaltic concrow paths and re.lativoiy low raisad
hills constructed of materials excavated from within the pond area.
Landscaping of the entire area as a botanical garden is to be provided.
From within the pond area, at the central area of this improvement
project, a water level control structure and overflow wi ll be constructed
to Shingle Creek to the sough and west. We understand the pond will be
some. -that "L" shaped, having a dima ision of approximately 180 ft. by
200 ft. and is proposed to be on th:o carder of 4 to 5 feet in depth.
Of primary concern arc the stability and consolidation characteristics
of the existing soils underlying the site.. F-om previous construction
and field exploration in this area, organic soils consisting of semi-
fibrous to fibrous peat wi th overlying sandy f i l 1 1 i ke°l y extend to depths
on the order of 15 to as much as 25 feet below the existing ground surface.
At the present time, the ground surface is landscaped and grass covered
and at the time of our meeting, standing ;rater was noted within a portion
of the area. This may have been due to precipitation or high ground water
levels associated with Shingle. Creek. The field exploration is to consist
of 8 exploratory borings. Considering the previously determined depth of
peat and organic materials at this site, the recommend that these borings
extend to a depth of approximately 30 feet below the existing ground surface
or into the non - organic soils underiying the site. To determine the
compressibility and shear strength of the soils, we propose to use Shelby
tube sampling procedures to obtain relatively undisturbed samples of the
peat soils for testing. In-place torvan3 tests may also be run for more
� City of Brooklyn CunLcr
� May 18 198
Page 2
^
accurately doiormininU the shc/,r sirco;Lh of the organic soils as well.
Laboratory testing to Joturminu the coisturc content, organic contort,
�
unit dry density, and shear sLrcnCih of organic soils will also be
�
conducted to evaluate the conso\iJaiion characteristics of L|"so organic.
materials. AL the lucaiion of 6nriny 2, K the wcst side of the project
area, and baring 6, near the arbor orca, us raconvnunJ extending the
borings to depths of 50 to 60 fcuL to evaluate the positioning of a
small diameter (4 inch to 6 inch) water supply well for the pond water,
�
Several grain size dncrmina1ion tests will be provided for design of
�
�
these wells.
�
After completion of the field exploration a detailed engineering soil
report will be prepared discussing thc design and construction recommenda
tions for this project as related to the soil and ground water conditions
encountered. Our recommendations will include a discussion of support
systems for the proposed patio arbor, and board walk as well as pathways
�
around the site, the stability of slopes adjoining the pond and support
� '
� of the pedestrian bridge. Three copies of our report would be submitted
to the City and 2 copies to Brauer and Associates Ltd. Inc. Based on our
schedule, we anticipate f|uld exp\orMon could commence almost immediately
after notice to proceed, and o completed engineering report submitted
to the City within approximately 7 working days thereafter.
�
Based on the scope of work outlined above and the fee schedule included
�
with this proposal, we estimate the total fee for this exploration and
�
engineering evaluation would be on the order of $3100 to S34OO. You will
of course only be charged for the actual number of units utilized,
extended at the appropriate unit rates.
This proposal is submitted in duplicate for your acceptance. When accepted,
please have an authorized representative of the party responsible for
�
payment of invoices sign and date one copy and return to us as our
�
authorization to proceed. Th: attached General Conditions form an integral
part of our contract to provide services. If you have any questions,
please do not h to contact us. We look forward to having this
opportunity to be of service to the City of Brooklyn Center on this proJect,
�
Very truly yours
� ,
�
STS CONSULTANTS, LTD.
too My
James H. Overtoom, P.E.
�
'
� Regional Vice President
�
Enc: Foe Schedule
General Conditions
cc: 2 City of Brooklyn Ccotcr
�
� \ HFK file
� ���r
City of Br"oklyn Ccnwr
may 13, 1901
Page thrcc
ACCEPTED:
(date)
signature)
STS Proposal P -574
STS Copyright, May, 1984
UY0 -
240'.5 An;ia ix) I i s 1 —C il Sul t C
.55441
FEE SCHUDUI,I",
Engineering, S"bsurfauQ Enplaration and Laboratory Testing
ENGINEE SERVICES
Charges for engineering and technical personnel will be made for time spent
in the field, in consultaLlon, in preparation of reports and in travel to and
from the job site.
1.. Services of Engineering Technician $ 26.00/hour.
2. Services of Field Engineer $ 32.00/hour
3. Services of Engineering Geologist $ 39.00/hour
4. Services of Assistant Project Engln2cr $ 42.50/hour
5. Services of Projoct Engineer $ 47.50/hour
6. Services of Senior Project Engineer $ 55.00/hour
7. Services of Principal Engineer $ 60.00/hour
S. Services of Draftsman $ 21.00/hour.
9. Services of Secretary $ 21.00/hour
Expl
I. Transportation: via company or private vehicle $ 0.32/mile
via public conveyance Cost + 15%
2. Computer Service Charges, Long Distance Telephone
Meals and Accomodations Cost + 15%
3. Outside Services Cost + 15%
4. Sample Storage Beyond 60 Days $ 0.20 /sample /month
$ 10.00/month (minimum)
S. Shipping Charges cost + 15%
Reports
Report Distribution — A mazimum of 6 copies total of each report will be furnished
to two addresses at the time of initial report submittal.
I. Additional copies, if requested $ 15.00 (minimmm per cc
2. Repro(luc'Lion of previous reports (please remit in advance) $ 35.00 (minimum pal' ep,,
1. Layout, Elevations and Uki 14y CIParance 2-Man Cruw $ 60.00/hour
2. Out of Town Accommodations $ 39.00/man/dmy
3. Services of Truck Mounted CME-75 Drill Rig, 2-Han Grow $ 92.00/hour
4. Services of CNG-750 All Turralu Drill Rig $ 98.00/hour
5. Services of CME-45 BaNbardler Mounted Drill Rig $ 92.00/hour
6. Diamond Bit Wear Cost + 15%
7. Expendable Items Cost • 15%
8. Outside Services Cost + 15Z
9. 1 1/2•Inch to 2-inch PVC riezomoor Pipe $ 4.00/foot
ROTES: 1) Overtime, time in excess of 8 hours/day or 40 hours,waek is
1.25 x applicable rate.
2) o ve j-tjT j , ,e, Sat Sunjay or local legal holidays is
1.25 x applicable rate.
ROUTINE SOIL CLASSIFICATION TESTS
1. Visual Engineering Classification $ 3.00/sample
2. Water Content Test $ 5.00/test
3. Density Determination $ 5.00/test
4. Unconfined Compressive Strength $13.00 test
5. Hand PeneuoLoter Test $ 2.00/test
Effective thro"gh Dvrembor 1984.
Mez:ber i.ntr_o(jirccd the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACC EI):t11rI1' V�OF. z.t ` .; C'or,,TRACT 1982 -0 {CHLORINE/
STOI?T:( ROn T' z'' 1982 -27)
WHEREAS, pursuant to written Contract 1932 -0 signed with the City
of Brooklyn Center, Mli.nnesota., Hastings FIl,. , (I_j.ng Cor:pany, Inc. has satisfactorily
completed the following ir,3provement in accordance with said contract:
CFFLORINE /STORAGE,' ROOM PROJECT NO. 1932 -27
NOVI, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The %-.ork comp7_eted under said contract is accepted and approved.
Previously A pproved Tota Am ount
Original Award $23,212.00 $23,212.00
Change Order No. 1 997.45 9
TOTAL $24,209.45 $24,209.45
2. The value of work performed is equal to the sum of the original
contract and change order.
3. It is hereby directed tha final payment be made on said contract,
taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount to be
paid for said improvement under said contract shall be $24,209.45.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
� Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
l
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1984 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO PROVIDE FOR WAGE AND
SALARY ADJUSTMENTS
---- -wwe..w- -- ---- -- 4-- - ----. --------------------------------- --------
WHEREAS, Section 7.08 of the City Charter of the City of Brooklyn Center
does provide that the City Council may, by majority vote of its members, transfer
unencumbered appropriation balances from one office, department, or agency to
another within the same fund; and
WHEREAS, Section 7.08 of the City Charter does also provide for the
increase of a budget appropriation by the City Council if the actual receipts
exceed the estimates, but not to exceed the actual receipts; and
WHEREAS, Section 7.09 of the City Charter does provide for a contingency
appropriation as a part of the General Fund Budget, and further provides that the
contingency appropriation may be transferred to any other appropriation by the Cit.
Council; and
WHEREAS, on October 3, 1983, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center adopted a budget for the calendar year 1984; and
WHEREAS, when said budget was adopted, 1984 salaries and wages for some
City employees had not been set; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did appropriate funds for departmental labor
and fringe benefits in the amount of $213,453 to Unallocated Departmental Expense
(Department #80) to provide funds for 1984 salary and wage settlements; and
WHEREAS, all wages and salaries for the calendar year 1984 have now been
set by the Council; and
n Budget, a reorganization HEREAS since the adoption of the 1 84 of
P 9 g
certain employee positions within the Department of Public Works has been
approved by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, said reorganization did eliminate one position whose salary had
been paid in part by the Public Utilities Fund and replaced it with a position
whose salary is to be paid from the General Fund Budget and to be reimbursed from
the Public Utility Fund:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center to transfer $213,453 from the following Unallocated Departmental
Expense (Department #80) appropriations:
REMMU11 110.
01 -4100 Salaries, Rep Aar r Flrployees $ 184,126
O1 -41 Pmj Re�;ular 2,079
01 -4142 PER(- Cmbired 4,807
014143 PIRA- Police 6,849
01J4144 Social S�ty 6,253
01 - Hospitalizatirn Inourance 9,032
01»4152 Life Irarmce 161
01-415'1 Defen Gmpensaticn 146
$ 213,453; ail
Increase the awv t of adnini.strative services to be reimbursed by the Public
Utilities Fund in the , of $26,353; and
I
Ibmsfer $13,536 fran the Contingency Appropriation; and
Irr-rea -Se the follmairg depart rental or divisional app in the total
am=t of $253,342 as follcxz:
Depart- Salaries Salaries Salaries PERA PERA PERA Health Life
mat or Regular CNertirr- TeT4x rary Regular Ccxrbined Police FICA Insura oe Insurance
Division 4100 4112 4130 4141 4142 4143 4144 4151 4152 Od-,er
o...gq.sn ....ia....r. ir+.....+► fr.e..w... ......�.r+i .e+.�+ -.... .:4.w.:+...r
Manager $ 11,544 0 0 0 401 0 511 1,244 20 234(1)
Electicns 364 0 0 0 20 0 26 72 0 0
Assessing 5,159 0 0 0 284 0 361 828 -7 0
Finance 13,444 0 0 725 350 0 458 1 - 0
Grvt. Eld 1,061 0 0 0 58 0 74 881 -18 0
police 78,068 4,307 1,953 114 689 8,483 880 9,680 - 80 0(2)
Fire 0 0 1,560 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(3)
Plan/Insp 6 0 0 0 384 0 359 1,080 -10 0
Hnetgency 2,235 0 0 0 14 239 18 216 -2 0
Animal. Ch 0 0 208 0 11 0 15 0 0 0
lb ineer 31,119 0 0 378 1,514 0 1,689 2,743 -8 0
Struts 15,873 530 830 556 656 0 835 3,334 -25 0
Veh. Main 5,127 65 0 163 200 0 255 1,067 -8 0
R&' kb 7,589 0 90 205 315 0 401 1,296 -12 0
Parks Mtc 12,436 350 2,179 332 649 0 826 2,606 420 0
Total $ 190,990 5,252 6,820 2,473 5,555 8,72> 6,708 26,775 187 234
(1) 4157 Deferred Car)ensation (2) 4153 Dental Disirance (3) 4158 Disability Insurance M �
Date %yam
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregnirg resolution teas duly steed by
maiber , and upm vote being tak therax , the follckmE voted in
favor thereof:
aril the follmirg voted against the same:
rbXax tI said resolution kw declared duly passed and adopted.
l � ± �� !'t+J g Y - J �y .. � - ._ ,�f,..� ./ . f� . gyp_ _..�.,�}�- .. .7J1A 7,�.f.��y.�,}�.__. _. . ...... - ___... _. -_.. ..___ - -__. __ -._ - .._._.. .... _.__..__,.. ..,.._.. .... ,. .._ ... . ... _... -._ ....._
L1.l t VC L� cJ.4 l f I C.tl, 1'11.1ViYL.
rT AI�1txS1'sL'I1S FOR SALARY INCREASES FOR MAY 21, 1984 C a NCIIL
ACI= NiAM
AC17V=
MY NGR FLECT ASSESS FINAANM GVI= PCLICE FIRE PLAN aEU ANIMAL M SIR MM Mi MC P&R AI1� PRK MM
OE,MTE'CT CME 13 14 15 16 19 31 32 33 34 35 41 42 43 61 69 NIM;..
4100 SAL=, Pkpted 169,236 4,764 94,612 169,934 128,400 1,050,801 130,816 31,495 221,094 299,495 94,516 142,858 233,951 2,771,972
Ad 800 80 128 77, 1 15 3,3A7 129, 1,1 28,869 13' 33,7 �2 315,8 99,643 150,447 246,3 2,952.962
TO AAILISP 11,5441 5,159 13,444 1,061 78,068 0 6;971 2 ,23? 0 31,119 15,1573 5,17, 12,4 19 0 y q?
"4;12_ _ SALARIES, OiIF.TII�`7E p 1,300 4,2 7 4,700 1,3f0 7,CW 79, , i '
Ai 't ,al 1,370 58 4 11 2130 1 x_36 5 7 ,?^� 8 4 +_,,
MAR=, .7 l ta f 7� TO f1Lm - f 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 537 c� 0 3� 5, 2
YHJ1."11C�.�
4130 _ , �AA' p 1 1 1 �` , 1 7 , , , 1 254
Adjusted 4,400 14,900 2 3,200 49 ,322 79,880__ 8,9D0 4,712 10,700 _ 17,4 1 + -2 45 �� 00
0 0 0 0 1, 953 1 0 00 258 0 830 0 ,90 2 6 , 32J
...- .__._. Total SalCa']„QrJ � 1731 -T , 1 a 1 1 , / 1
11l p " 7 109 179,934 152 9� 1 152 417 78 3� 139 7i�31 495 �5c) -I 23,494 3�,�5 7, �3 ���,53� 3,1�,392
A�i,Z 18 1� 5 1 73 114 1831378 153 1,2',6,745 79, 146, ,_ 4, 71? 26 ,61 0 3 2 �
101 .1 1 -1 �x �n
_.�.,�.. �. :
TU lT�J�SP 11,`x+ 4 5,159 13,444 1,061 8�1,?28 1 6,971 2_,?3j 31,119 17,233 5,Iy2 7,
``
RII x
4 ,5th i0, T ,�T - I `?,uj,- b,��t a i',
4141 PERA
l�tl,justai 8245 2238 7, ; 11 i 3M 3,214 4 6;7i�) 44,C41
P) .ila;IJ;i 0 0 0 7� 0 114 0 0 0 0 38 5J6 1636 3-?
,`73
4142 PERA - �MTdI1 t>t b, 2�,OZ3 S, ITJI 8T10 13 1 7,684 543 2 9, 1 30 3 612 5 , 3 1� ��i 9 i 14
�ii, jus`�ed 7,028 2 6,3 5 767 8,4Fag 14,070 8, 068 5 57 9 1 O,� � 1 12 0 86 3,312 6,12_8 .916 f�
J : -I l C� C 401 2J 234 360 58 6v9 0 38z! 14 11 1, 6`.>5 2X 315 5=19
4143 - PEFA FCLTCE i xp _'.x,..082 5 { ., j.
Pdius`e] 114.565 2,833 1 73
TO ALUUSP 0 0 0 T O 0 8, . _�_ 0 0 z3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.722
4144 -- FICA ?4 11,09 333 7, ,882 10 17,028 9 691 315 10,798 15 4,673 7, 1,513 113,570
Adiustd 11, 0 X59 8 027 713 10,777 17, 10,177 _709_ 33J 1 ?_, 16,5 4 1 9_28 928 'T 1 0 4 12 .?
1ti T 511 2l5 3 11 4 74 8 0 359 18 15 1,c 39 835 b5 y
4Ji
1 4151 =ALI ATICN IIS[TttrINC f 31���195 5, 11,872 9 58,267 7,4<0 1, 11,872 196,2'33 8,904 15, 34 i T,2I3
Pr]1us� i__1�. ? ��.�; � „ �6�0 10 67 9?7 8500 1 14615 23 7,300 10.200 18PAO 194, 048
ALIIU,SI' 1,244 72 828 17 881 _ 9,6� 0 1,080 212,`T�13 3, 3�+ � 7 1, 2,c^b ��,rT
4152_ ___ LIEE LNQ1RANtE - 2133 5 �?1 1 1 101 1,1� 80 1 128 21p4 b7 l b ibb 3,105
�ju5t 5 5?4 112 83 560 1,1 7Q -- 14 _ 1� 1&3 5 84 145 2, 918
TO P�JtiS'I' � 0 -
-8 -12 -20 -187
- 4153 DENTAL INSURANCE - t op 1 1 , 0 93
M iuste9 1,093 14-4
Tt) AajUSF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4157 -- M= MTSIMTICk p 2,923 2,923
Ac'jl -234 i;7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2?'4
4158 D ISA31 rtv INSfJRANCE - 3b5
Ad 'usted 3£
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Pers Services AjVed 204,846 5 128,951 271,743 181,513 1, 351,032 79,825 164,718 367823 5,057 275,899 385,582 113,512 170,951 334,4 3,640,799
Adji_Oied 218 800 6, 341 135,5 218 183,569 1,455, 81 , 173, 3 9 rz 5, 301 313 3 40 8 170 1�7 y31 180 3 53
I t d`3UST 13, 1 3? 16 699 2 l�6
104,094 1 %j 8 7 84 2,720 234 37,435 2?_ 588 6 869 9,864 19 ,53 253 ;'
i ntroducc, :1 the following i csolut.i_on and moved
its adoption:
I ?J �.7LU`i?�)tiT A1YJ1:r, C R PL 1C, `Ed'r OF POLICE SERGEANT POSITION
WIIa R ,S, Sergi _ nt R.ayy)nd 10ac < will be retiring from his position
as police sergeant effective june 30, 1984; and
WHEREAS, Sergeant Reach qualifies for participation in the City's
Employee Retirement Incentive Program as per Council Resolution No. 83 -33; and
Wv - Resolution No. 83 -33 specifies that positions vacated by
employee's retiring under the Employee 'Retirement Incentive Program will
not be filled without prior City Council approval of the funds to be expended
on filling the vacancy; and
WHEREAS, the police administration has submitted a request to replace
the sergeant position vacated by Sergeant Beach's retirement and has indicated
that the replacement is essential to meet the current staffing needs in the
police department; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended that it is in the best interest
of the City to replace the sergeant position.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that the replacement of the police sergeant position vacated
by the retirement of Sergeant Raymond Beach is hereby approved.
Dare Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor_ thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Tj
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FRO11: James Lindsay, Chief of Police
1) ATE, May 15, 1984
SUBJECT: Justification of Sergeant's Position
As you ki'low, Serg
,eant Ray Beach has tendered his resignation
effective June 30, 198 It is my request that the vacancy
created by the resignation be filled for the reasons outlined
below.
The ori,anizational structure of the Police Department was
recent-'i changed, shifting the recponLibiliti of the sergeants
from basically administrative personnel to working lead-
meri/suoervisors on the street. This shift has allowed for
increased nianpoTo7er on the street, in addition to the availability
of a leadman for supervising crucial calls for service. The
Police lidr , , - ,inistration feels the goal. of the reorganization to
gain -more manpower on the street has been met, as reflected in
the folaowing percentage breakdown of incidents handled initially
by sergeants in the first quarter of 1984.
Part 1 7.1%
Part 11 13.7%
Traffic 17.3%
Part 111 16.0%
Part IV 13.4%
Part V 10.8%
All Calls 13.5%
The current scheduling with five sergeants has provided the
scheduling of at least one sergeant on duty every shift. The
supervision of the officers by the sergeants permits the two
captains to handle administrative duties up to 16 hours a day
with the assurance of a first line supervisor available to
resl:,)ond to the needs of the officers. The expertise and
availability of the sergeants contributes to the effective
operation of the Police Department. For further explanation of
the duties and responsibilities of the sergeants, please see the
attached job description.
For the reasons stated above, I would like to request that the
vacancy created by Sergeant Beach's resignation be filled as soon
as possible in order to maintain the current complement of five
sergeants.
tai r :, l ,'1 I C:i t I
r
SerQcant /Cor }noral
DATE,
POSI N SU I •1? P'y
Shall 1) all. dutie7 as outlined in the Police Officer
C )_ . .ssif :s_c� :�lti0n. In addition, may be delegated certain authority
ana res to supervise and direct the activities
of policy o" icc—S, Comm- nsurate with the orders of Depart -
mcnt superiors and according to departmental regulations
and procedures
DUT TES AlM R ESP ON STBI ..,I TIES
•1. Shall perform all duties as outlined in the Police
Officer. classification.
2. Be responsible for supervision of the shirt assigned.
3. Order off -duty officers to duty or retain officers from
preceding shift to accommodate requirements or emergencies.
4. Review, order corrections and approve official reports,
and other documents as required by Department procedures.
5. Recommend meritorious acts for recognition.
6. Take disciplinary action for infractions of Police Depart-
ment procedures and policies.
.7. Receive complaints from the public, investigating and
reporting same to the appropriate superior officer.
€3. Inspect uniforms and equipment to ensure efficient
operations in compliance with Department policy.
9. In the absence of a superior officer, order a police
officer to cease his /hor duties and report to the station
until an officer of higher ran;: is available to review
any infractions and take appropriate action. ,
10. Conduct crime: scene investigations and follow -up criminal
or intornal inves' a s . lgned.
I. Serve as a field training officer as assigned..
I)t,1 AND RESPONITRUITIQ (Cunt.
Assist thy: Patrol captain in preparing evaluations of
officers as necessaryp
Assist officers in dealing wUh oi sens it ive
community PrOolams or issuns, rcCportirig results of same
to his/her &MCGiate superior officer.
14. tssumn responsibility for action where no guidelines
for standard operating proccdarn exist, showing initiative
i r to unique or unusual emergency situations with
leadership.
15. Report in a thncly manner any and all unusual situations
occurring on his/her duty 51-0-ft to the appropriate super-
visor so that follow-up action can be taken by those
personnel necessary.
16. Perform such other d as assigned.
JStqUqLEDGB, SKILLS AND MBILITIES
Knowledge of and ability and willingness to practice
supervisory techniques and relationships.
2. Working knowledge of City ordinances, traffic regulations
and related State and Federal laws.
3. Technical knowledge and capability of performing all
standard operating procedures required as a police officer
for the City of Brooklyn Center.
4. Knowledge and ability to instruct in the use of law
enforcement equipment and techniques.
5. Comprehension of rules covering evidence and ability
to direct the gathering, identifying and preserving of
evidence a t a crime scene and knowledge to present it
properly in court.
6. Resourcefulness and flexibility to•be able to size up
•situations, innovate and i as necessary to adapt
to unusual situations in a timely fashion.
7. Nbility to make fair, timely and effective decisions
both in an emergency situation and in a nonciaergcncy
situation.
S. S speech facility and vocabulary to clearly
an oral and written form.
and concisely cownunicato in
0 SKILLS AND ARILTITtS (Cant.)
9, Self-confidence and abilUy to to changing Circum
stances.
10 Abilit to practicQ honest7, cons cient icusncss, sincer
straightforwardness in Ocaling with others.
11. Possess positive, nonantagoni5tic attit udo " cess"y to
secure the respect of subordinates, assoc iates and the
public.
12. possess and reflect overall leadership characteristics,
t accol) responsibility, emotional
including willingness ct from
matu)-
�jty, reliability, ability to insp res
others, decision making in a decisive manner, initiative
taking and a sense of humor.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Must have a minimum of three (3) years experience as a sworn
officer with the Brooklyn Center police Department Or five (5)
years total experience as a sworn Officer within the State
of Minnesota.
POSITION DESCRIPTION APPROVED
z
B)C Date approved
Ds par
tment Direc�
19
kW
By,$,
�0 Date y0proved
1 �0%50
y Manager
r
Member introduced the following
Or_esoluti_on and moved its adoptiion:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL FOR
ISSUANCE O-F INDUSTRIAL DEVE1JOPIMIEN'T REVENUE BONDS UNDER
THE MIN', MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AND
AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF A NOTTCE, OF THE HEARING
BE IT PESOLVED by the City Council (this Council) of the City
of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. (the City), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals -
1.01 The City is authorized by the Municipal Industrial
Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended (the
Act) to issue and sell revenue bonds for the purpose of refunding
bonds previously issued under the Act.
1.02 Brookdale Office Park Partnership, a Minnesota general
partnership (the Company), proposes that the City issue its revenue
bonds under the Act in the approximate aggregate principal amount of
$3,450,000 (the Refunding Bonds) in order to redeem and refund
certain revenue bonds previously issued by the City under the Act
(the Original Bonds). The original Bonds, denominated $8,200,000
Commercial Development Revenue Bonds (Brookdale Office Park Partner-
ship Project) Series 1982, were issued in order to finance the
acquisition, construction, improvement and eq uipping uipping of three office
buildings located in the area northwest of the Brookdale Shopping
Center in the City.
1.03 The Refunding Bonds would be industrial development bonds
within the meaning of Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1954, as amended (the Code). Section 103(k) of the Code, and the
regulations adopted and proposed thereunder, require that the City
hold a public hearing relating to the proposed issuance of the
Refunding Bonds prior to approving their issuance, which hearing is
to be held after notice of the hearing is published at least fourteen
days prior to the date of the hearing.
Section 2. Public Hearing
2.01 A public hearing regarding the proposed issuance of the
Refunding Bonds is hereby called and shall be held on June 25, 1984
at 7:30 o'clock p.m. at the City Hall.
2.02 The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of the
hearing to be published in a (,- general circulation
O in tlic Cit'y, a.nd in the official — ?lot t C1. - tY, all- less than
fourt-e�L days prior' to the date ;`c,: ' t-he pluis*Dlic hearing, in
siabs tan tio-Ily the form of th.e notice hereto.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn: Center,
Minnesota, this 21st day of May, 1-934.
ATTEST:
M 0 2
City Clerk
The motion for adopt of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by Member I and ul-)cn vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
MEMOIRANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Brad Hoffman, Administrative Assistant
DATE: May 21, 1984 )
SUBJECT: IRB Public Hearing
When the Brookdale Office Partnership (Brooklyn Crossing) received its
approval for an $8,200,000 IRB, it was for a temporary financing of the
project. At the time of approval, it was understood that they would come
back for a refinancing. The resolution before the Council calls for a public
hearing on that request.
It should be noted that their bonds are due in July of 1985. They will
be able to call the bonds in July of 1984. Because they do not plan to
start the other buildings (two office buildings) at this time, they are
seeking $3,450,000 in refinancing. A public hearing would be scheduled
for June 25, 1984 at 7:30 p.m.
i
CITY OF Bl, OOKL` N' CT_:i`!'1'Fl?, MINNESOTA
NOTIC. 01F P11"BLI REGARDING
01
R, `JPNUE BONDS
NOTICE IS HERELY GIVE 11 that the City Council, of the City of
Brooklyn Center, ML- ne.sota, will meet on Tune 25, 1984, at 7:00 p.m.
at t'rle City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, in Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on a
proposal that the Cw-y issue its revenue bonds under the municipal
Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as
amended (the ct) . This Notice i.s given pursuant to the provisions
of Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and regulations
adopted thereunder.
The proposal for issuance of the revenue bonds has been made by
Brookdale Office Park Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership
(the Company). Pursuant to previous authorization by the City
Council, following proper notice and public hearing, the City issued
its $8,200,000 Commercial Development Revenue Bonds (Brookdale Office
Park Partnership Project), Series 1982 (the Original Bonds) in order
to finance a portion of the cost of a project on behalf of the
Company, consisting of the acquisition, construction, improvement and
equipping of three commercial office buildings, located in the area
northwest of the Brookdale Shopping Center in the City (the Project).
n.1y one office building, approximately 55,000 square feet in size,
as a.ctuall_y constructed. As a result, a portion of the Original
Bonds were redeemed prior to maturity. The outstanding principal
amount of the Original Bonds is $3,450,000. The Company now proposes
that the City issue revenue bonds in the approximate aggregate
principal amount of $3,450,000 in order to redeem and refund the
Original Bonds (the Refunding Bonds).
The Refunding Bonds will be limited obligations of the City and
the principal of and interest thereon will be payable solely from
the revenues of the Project pledged to the payment thereof. The
payment of the Refunding Bonds may be secured by a mortgage and other
security interests in the Project properties. No holder of the
Refunding Bonds shall have the right to compel any exercise of the
taxing power of the City to pay the Refunding Bonds or the interest
thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property of the City
other than the revenues of the Project.
All persons interested may appear at the public hearing and
express their views with respect to the proposal that the City issue
the Refunding Bonds.
DATED: , 1984. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
City Clerk
r
Member introduced the following resolution and
mowed its adoption:
RI SOLUTIO d NO.
RESOINTION EXPRESSING PECO NITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE
DEDICATED ED PUi IC } !�,u ' C;ti,
WHEREAS, Harold Rossow served the City of Brooklyn Center as an
employee of the Parks Ma.intonance Division for more than twenty three years
from August 21, 1959 to February 28, 1983; and
WHEREAS, he retired from public service on February 28, 1983:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, that the dedicated public service of Harold Rossow is
recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center and that the City
wishes him a long and happy retirement.
I
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof_:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
i
int-rodh,i' the following resolution and
moved its iido )tion:
NESOLUTIC)"A' NO.
RJ-: 7 0 ' 0,1 7 APPRECIATION FOR THE
; T C
DDTC' P !, OF LI'DYI- 1101
;'4 Lloyd 1-1 servc(3 the City of Brooklyn Center as an
employee of tl' Stree ! Division for more than nineteen years
from April 1.4, 1964 to February 29, 1984; and
V he retired from public service on February 29, 1984:
TH,F'REIFCRE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Bro, Center, that the dedicated public service of Lloyd Holthus is
recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center and that the City
wishes him a lon-j and happy retirement.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
PC
Momber introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION EXPRJ 1T%'CO OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE
DEDICATED PI LIC SERVICE OF jOHN THOMPSON
W1 John Thompson served Lhu City of Brooklyn Center as an
employee of the Vehicle Maintenance Division for more than eighteen years
from March 14, 1966 to March 30, 1984; and
W711EPEAS, he retired from public service on March 30, 1984:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, that the dedicated public service of John Thompson is
recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center and that the City
wishes him a long and happy retirement.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION EXPPESSINC RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE
DEDICATED Tq<C SERVICE OF QWAN LEITER
WHEREAS, Glenn Leiter served the City of Brooklyn Center as an
emjplcyce of the Public Utility Division for more than twenty three years
from May 1, 1961 to lay 8, 1984; and
he retired from public service on May 8, 1984.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, that the dedicated public service of Glenn Leiter is
recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center and that the City
wishes him a long and happy retirement.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
i ii I - r odi iced the following resolution and
mo its adopt. on:
RESOJ U'1 jl'�Ijl.
I )��';T I'l OIN ")F AND AIPPIU.,CIATION FOR THE
0 N UPRE Sitq
DEDICA'I'ED PUJIBLiC S!;';PVJ E OF FAYMO'u BEACH
Sp Ve S
I I 1 9 F." se �� d a a member of tine
Brooklyn C'ent-c- Police Df--apartmenL s:in" january 8, 1962; and
WHEREAS, he was promoted to the position of Sergeant in January,
1965; and
WHEFT he will retire from public service an June 30, 1.984; and
M1F'R1 - his devotion to the tasks and responsibilities of his
position contributed subs Lanc ly to the progress and development of the
Brooklyn Center Police Department; and
WHEREAS, his public service and civic effort for the betterment
of the community merit the gratitude of the citizens of Brooklyn Center; and
WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that his service to the community
as a police officer should be recognized and expressed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that the dedicated public service of Sergeant Raymond Beach,
as a member of the Brooklyn Center Police Department, is hereby recognized
and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by meem1ber , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Nrl,x ALixxticcil t1he following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESO1,UT-f..GN ;J:.ZPRESS1NG RUC YINITICA OF AND APPRECIATION
I"OR 1 1"flE" PLH3LIC SLARVIC7 01" TI&MAN A. NEJkX)N
A. Nelson served the City of Brooklyn Center as an
employee for more tion 29 years from October 12, 1954 to May 31, 1984; and
WHEREAS, he served in the position of Liquor Stores Manager for the
City of Brooklyn Center; and
1 he served for over 20 years on the Brooklyn Center Volunteer
Fire Department; and
WHEREAS, lie retired from public service on May 31, 1984; and
KiEREAS, through his dedication to his position as Liquor Stores Manager,
he was instrumental in the growth of the municipal liquor stores in Brooklyn
Center; and
WhEREAS, his devotion to the tasks and responsibilities associated
with his position contributed substantially to the sound progress and develop-
ment of the City; and
WHEREAS, his public service and civic effort for the betterment of
the community merit the gratitude of the citizens of Brooklyn Center:
NUN THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, that the dedicated public service of Truman A. Nelson is
recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center and that the City
wishes him a long and happy retirement.
Late Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Mcumor Cline I ntk : irli:a.cxli_i c>d the following resolution and moved {
its adoption:
RESU11JTJ(Y4 NO,
I
RESOLUTION : yP, .i._',JJ I I:CCY I`i}l: %t OF AND APPRECIA` 10',N
1:'( .Ir.I' iDt .L:i -J } t,�_IC:ia'���`f� .t OF In1E1T.P.,1� L7i1X)iJ1_ aI
WHEREAS, Warren L i_ndqui t has F,ea ved as an educator and administrator
in Brooklyn Center School District 086 since 1950; and
WI-IEP.I AS, he has served as principal of Earle Brown elementary school
since 1958; and
WHEREAS, through his efforts and cooperation the school has been an
integral part of the comnunity; and
WHEREAS, Warren Lindquist has b en particularly cooperative and
innovative in the implementation of an effective safety patrol program as
well as other areas of school administration; and
WHEREAS, Warren Lindquist is retiring fromo his responsibilities as
principal of Earle Brown elementary school; and
WHEREAS, he will be missed by students, faculty, community, and the
school safety patrol; and
W11EP.EAS, it is highly appropriate that his service to the community
should be recognized and expressed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, on behalf of the citizens of Brooklyn Center, that an expression
of thanks be extended to Warren Lindquist for his efforts in the safety patrol
program as well as the many additional programs and accomplishments in his
career; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Brooklyn Center City Council extends
best wishes for an enjoyable and well deserved retirement.
Date Mayor
ATTEST: _
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by riei lxar Celia Sc: oL:t, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor ther
and t fol votod aga inst tile. sai - i - te:
whey upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
i
CITY
OF 1
! i
t
...,� .» �s,� .3. w _e. � r..+._ e:' .:.::✓ e Jt,(
3
� C Z �
f 14
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager.
FROM: Director of Finance
DATE: May 10, 1984
SUBJECT: R esolut i o ns Au W rite - of Un_c_oll
Checks and Accounts Rece
T have attached two resolutions which, if adopted by the City Council,
would allow me to write off the City book, $1,851.98 in accounts receivables
and $800.59 in bad checks, which we have determined to be uncollectible.
The uncollectible accounts receivables consist of three non - payments of
repairs to fire hydrants which had been damaged in automobile accidents and
one billing for the cleaning up of dirt that had been dumped in the City
street. All but one of the receivables had been turned over to our collection
agency and returned because they were unable to locate the individuals. The
other receivable was for fire hydrant damage that was caused by a stolen car.
All of the bad checks were turned over to the collection agency for collection
and have been returned to us by them because they, too, were unable to collect
them. All of the bad checks were taken at our liquor stores, with the excep-
tion of one check which was taken for a building permit and one check for a
recreation program. Unfortunately, because of a new policy instituted by the
City Attorney and the Police Department list year, the uncollectible bad checks
continue to grow, since we are no longer able to turn any checks over for
prosecution if they are under $50.00.
Respectfully submitted,
Q=
Paul W. Holmlund
PWH:ps
, x
IIe i.ntr o It ,:etil the follov resolution and inoved its
adoption:
RESOLI[JTJ i 1 , 1 0.
U'f "I C)}i f'_; ir;')}'ZT_' fvC� IIII C.I.I Y „(li.faF:I i(l "t� iI`I "E- r'1' U 1COLt.ECTIF I.is CIi -CKS
WIII r 1:AS, the Cil ;y Mana ;sir has reported tai t the f ol.,lo checks made
payable to the City of Brooklyn Cent ��.rr c u-.- ollectible becau: >e the pay(- - .. - s'
checking ac counts upon w they ai ti 3 iG 7 h , been closed and that attellpts
to locates the pay-ers have been tin suc F:; s,`:ul
IdO 1, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Broal�ly; C( to authorize the City Ear Go - w ite froiii the City
records as uncollectibl_e the fallowing check: >:
Payer Check Dated Amount
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR ST )T; ?S:
Michael Anderson 8-23 -82 $ 4.94
Tho iias A. Ber ;strain
8 64.8
Julianne K. Bullock 12 -24 -81 7.83
Claude W. Burnaugh 8 - - , 83 47.79
Glenn A. Bye 10 -18 -82 14.57
Steve Canaday 12- ®31 -81 10.27
Kenneth Canton 5-27 -82 13.00
Kenneth Carlton 10 -9 - 9.31
Laura Carlson 10- 13-83 9.75
J. Patrick Carroll 7 - 1 -83 18.33
Gary Clos -2
,� 4 �2 82_ 9.92
Chris Colbjornsen 8 - -83 4.29
Dawn M. Dulon 6- -18 - 83 13.76
Carol J. Duray 1- 26-.82 28.22
Carol J. Duray 1 -19 -82 5.00
Barbara R. Elmore 7 -26 -83 4.00
Scott C. Fahy 7- -13 - 83 7.91
Jay J. Finsrud 3-11 -82 7.65
Michael J. Ganzer 4 -1 -82 10.13
Michael Grah�jln 2 -23 -82 10.98
Sandie Grossklaus 6- 23-83 7.73
Paul Grubbs 3- -19 -82 20.67
Donald Haller 9- 10-.83 8.41
Paula J. Hennessey 3 -10 -83 4.40
Patricia Hervey 12 -2 -82 17.39
Steven Hill 6 -5 - 5.72
Steven Hill 6 -7 -82 11
Steven Hill 6 - - 16.72
Pun Son Hutcheson, 7 -11 -83 5.90
Cynthia K. Irwin 3 -6 -82 70.98
Linda C. Johnson 9 -16 -83 19.51
Wayne Jones 4 -2.482 10.00
Michael T. Katie 1 1- -16 -82 8.98
Michael T. Kane 1 4-16 -82 9.40
Steven I-1. Keller 7 ..8 - 6.34
Anita JoKristiansen 11-1 -83 30.65
Lee J. Kuklock 1W -20 -82 4.94
John E. Lindner 4 -19 - 19.72
RESOLUTION
Jahn E. Lindner 1 1- 19-83 $ 10.34
`l;aex i K. Lofgren 6-3-82 4.19
Kea hl.el -n L. I�Iercer 7 -2 -83 12.14
Eleanor 11 eur. ? -uer 2- 13--82 7.82
Ann M. O'Neill 8 -17 -82 16.38
Charles R. Pu" "Il 722 3.78
Royal Brass 9 -82 4.
Royal Brass 9 11--82 10.50
Royal Bras: 9- X11 --82 18.72
Robert D. Shivers, Jr. 8-- 12--83 6.24
Russ Stempson 7- .10 -82 10.29
Renee L. Taylor 8 30 5.21
Ardys 11. Vroman 10 - 11 - 83 5.86
Faster deston 7 - 1 - 83 9.45
Tamay Tnitt 9- 23--83 11.56
Lisa Wolfe 1- 16-82 7.56
----------
$ 725.84
GENERAL FUND:
James Merrill Construction 7 -5 -83 $ 64.75
Cathy C. toss 5- X28 -82 10.00
$ 74.75
4 ---------
TOTAL -ALL FUNDS $ 800
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by member , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
�eiYsbf r introdu -. -d the f ol_lowing resolution and moved its
RI ?�;O1_,.J'['IC)iv IlO w
RE` >OLU`TIOid 1 LIt1C� THE CITY 1Atlr`.OER TO WRITE -OFF
U.iCG% °,i Ci r �„_I: t °,s c ;i U '> 1t`,. '_ jr" l _(
tT IERf =:t ^a >, the City ', ant er has reported that the following accounts
receivables due to the City of Brooklyn Center are uncollectible:
NOW, TI'IsREi ORE, R E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Ce.nA-1cr to authori-ze the City ill na,g er to wri - e- off from the City
records as u:rcollectible the following accounts receivables:
Invoice
Name Ni nber Date Amount
GENERAL FUND:
Charles Jewell 3936 10-28--81 $ 111.67
PUBLIC UTILITIES FUND:
Jaynes 11ichael Moylan, Jr. 3757 03--31 -81 $ 84.76
Gene Albert Hozempa 3769 03-- 19--81 1 ,484.90
Walter Hanson 3758 03 - - 170.65
$ 740.31
TOTAL $ 1,851
Date' Mayon
ATTEST:
Clerk -- - - - -- The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
introdu (_'tl l_he following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION AU THO RIZING EXECU` J( O'r' AN AC,'U,`211E:NT
FI !B OF INTOWWWR 5000
Wier REAS, BE 17' RE , 7raYED by thQ City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center that the Mayor, Cat,, Ma nager, and Chief of Police are hereby authorized
to enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Public
Safety for the following purpose 7b receive from the State of Minnesota,
Department: of P ublic Safety, an in oxilyzer 5000 breath instrument and beath
alcohol simulator on a loan basis. The instruments are to be used by law
enforcement officers to assist them in the detection of motorists who may
be in violation of Minnesota Statutes, Section 169.121, or other Minnesota
laws or local ordinances or other law enforcement purposes.
BE IT FURI'11 -1�R ?;SOLVED that the Mayor, City Manager., and Chief of
Police be and they are authorized to execute such agreement.
Date _ Mayor
ATTEST: '__
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Ua4b kJN1f t`a,l "t i AVCt1tJE. e _
S7 PALJ L, M INti E O F 97
Enclosed you will find five copies of the agreement for the lend -lease of an
Intoxilyzer 5000, copies of a sample resolution, and if applicable forms and
information relating to old Breathalyzer equipment. This agreement is the
mechanism through SA,rhich we will be able to place a new infrared breath testing
instrument and simulator with your law enforcement agency.
These instruments have been purchased ti`, money from a federal highway and
traffic safety grant and from a State of Minnesota Legislative appropriation
of matching funds. We are distributing the testing instruments in a manner
similar to the program under which we have in the past distributed preliminary
breath test instruments.
To complete this paperwork, your county board or city council will first
need to pass a resolution similar to the sample resolution provided. Once
this is done the remainder of the agreement can be completed. Instructions
on the sample resolution and agreement are also enclosed.
It is our hope that you will find this approach to providing breath testing
equipment agreeable. If you have questions about the paperwork or the
equipment, please contact Our Breath Testing Section at 612- 296 -7940. We
are prepared to assist you in any manner necessary to complete the process.
Sincerely,
1
Lowell C. Van Berkom
Forensic Laboratory Director
0
AN EQUAI, OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
AGREEMENT FOR THE LOAN OF INTOXILYZER 5000 EVIDENTIAL BREATH ALCOHOL TEST
I NSTRUMIFNITS
THIS AGREEIMENT, AND ENTERED IN by and be"L"ween the S1- , ate of Minnesota,
Department of Public Safety I Ely (hereinafter referred to as "DPS" ) and the local
government unit(s) designated as "Rccipient" on page 3 of this agreement (here-
inafter referred to as "Recipient ").
W11NIESSETH:
WHEREAS DPS has received grants and or appropriations of money for the
purchase of Intoxilyzer 5000 breath test instruments, and breath alcohol
simulators; and
WHEREAS DPS desires to provide a mechanism through which local law enforce-
ment agencies may use these breath test instruments to assist them in the de-
tection of drivers who are in violation of Minnesota laws relating to traffic
and highway safety, or for other law enforcement applictions,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN the parties hereto as follows:
I. DPS' Responsibilities.
A. DPS shall make available to Recipient an Intoxilyzer 5000 evidential
breath test instrument and a breath alcohol simulator specified on page 3 of
this agreement. Recipient will use and have possession of these instruments;
but DPS shall retain title and legal ownership of the instruments.
B. Any and all repairs shall be made by or at the direction of DPS. If
funding is available, DPS will pay for the cost of maintenance and repair or
replacement due to normal wear and tear resulting from routine, proper use of
the instruments.
C. DPS will maintain all necessary state and federal inventory control
records on these instruments.
II. Recipient's Responsibilities.
A. Recipient shall use the instruments specified on page 3 of this agree-
ment to assist in enforcing Minnesota laws and local ordinances and for other
law enforcement applications.
B. Recipient shall keep and maintain the instruments in proper operating
condition. Recipient shall supply all disposable components for the instru-
ments at Recipient's expense.
C. Recipient will be responsible for the cost of repairing or replacing
instruments which, in the opinion of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, have
been damaged due to abuse, misuse or other cause outside the scope of normal
wear and tear in routine proper use. Recipient will also be responsible for
the costs of maintenance and repair resulting from normal wear and tear in
routine proper use of these instruments if funding for such maintenance and
repair is not made available to DPS.
D. The instruments shall be made available for use by any breath test
operator certified by the State of Minnesota.
-1-
E Recipient shall not permit the inst ruments to be operated or tampered
wi by individuals who are not trained in their operation and certified by DPS
as ln 5000 operators.
F. Recipient shall make the instrt. available to authorized personnel
when required for inventory or inspection C)urposes.
G. Rer- i
, Pier)t shall cede to DPS the Breathalyzer 900 and 900A instruments
d on page 3 of this agreement, 4 DPS may dispose of through trade,
sale, or other imeans, it being agreed th<!,t any proceeds of such disposition
shall be retained by the State of Minnesota.
III. Term of A.0reement.
This Agreement shall take effect on the date of final approval by the
Commissioner of Finance and remain in eff,�ct until terminated by either of
the parties as provided in section IV.
IV. Termination.
This agreement ray be terminated by either DPS or Recipient with or without
cause upon sixty (60) days written notice to the other party. In the event of
such termination, Recipient shall return the instruments to the Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension Laboratory within thirty (30) days after the termination
of this Agreement. If Recipient fails to return the instruments within this
time period, Recipient may be assessed the cost of the instruments.
V. Assignment.
Recipient shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under
this Agreement without the prior written consent of DPS.
VI. Liability.
Recipient agrees to indemnify and save and hold the State of Minnesota, its
agents, and its employees harmless from any and all claims arising from the use
of the Intoxilyzer 5000 Instrument or from the performance of this Agreement by
Recipient or Recipient's agents or employees.
VII. Relationship of Parties.
Neither Recipient nor Recipient's agents or employees are to be considered
to be agents of DPS or to be engaged in any joint venture or enterprise with
DPS, and nothing herein shall be construed to create such a relationship.
-2-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, intending to be bound hereby, have
caused this Agreement to be duly executed.
IIIIVCIPIENT: __City OF Bpokl q Center STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
for Installation at Brooklyn Center PD BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION LABORATORY:
INTUXILYZER 5000 Recommended for Approval:
Nur,-,,L',er By:
Lowell C. Van Berkom
State asset number 529686 Title: Forensic Laboratory Director
MARK 11 A SIMULATOR Date:
Serial nUmbe-r M-008219 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
State asset number 529871 By:_
Description of Equipment ceded to the Title:
State of Minnesota: Date:
Breathalyzer 900 S/N 1341 Approved as to Form and Execution:
ATTORNEY GENERAL:
By:
Date:
RECIPIENT: COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION:
By: By:_
Title: Authorized Signature
Date:
Date:
APPROVED
By: COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE:
Title: By:
Date: Date:
A certified copy of the resolution must be attached authorizing the City of
Brooklyn Center to enter into this Agreement and authorizing the
and to execute this
O reement.
-3-
fl ..
�
t
MINUTES OF T11I? PROLE r; INt_S OF THE PLA1d14ING C0i'11ISSION
OF 11-111 CI'i'Y G „E i 1'IsYi C[ LATER IN THE COUNTY OF
HE11 A1;1) THE STA'`E OF MINNESOTA
RE:G! LAR SESSI :ON
Malty 10, 1 984
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
Thy Plan�in Commission met in regular session and was called to order by Chairman
George Lucht at 7:36 p.m.
ROL CALL
Chairman; George Lucht, Commissioners i?ancy Hanson, Lowell Ainas, Carl Sandstrom and
Bike lNe:l.son. Also present were Director of Planning and Inspection Ronald Warren,
City Engineer Janes Grube and Planning Assistant Gary Shallcross. Chairman Lucht
noted that Commissioners m=olly Pialecki and Mary Simmons had called to say they were
unable to attend and were excused.
AP PROV AL OF' MIN UTES �- APRIL 12, 19
Motion by Commissioner Sandstrom seconded by Commissioner Nelson to approve the
minutes of the April 12, 1984 Planning Commission meeting as submitted. Voting in
favor: Chairman Lucht, Commissioners Ainas, Sandstrom, and Nelson. Voting
against: none. Not voting: Commissioner Hanson. The motion passed.
DISCUSSION ITEM
Noting that no applicants were present, Chairman Lucht suggested that the
Com-mission review the discussion item. The Secretary briefly explained the nature
Of the 1raft Ordinance Amendment regarding financial institutions (see draft
attached). He explained that the ordinance change is to allow finance, real
estate, insurance and investment offices in the R3 Zoning District, but not banks.
He also noted that banks would hereafter be subject to the retail parking formula
rather than the regular office formula. The Planning Assistant also noted that
banks would not be allowed in the R5 Zoning District as a result of the amendment.
ACTION! RECO INMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDIhIANCE AHENIDh :ENT REGARDING FINANCI
I1, T i T UT1C`,' S
t :o on by Ccmr;issioner 1 seconded by Corwnissioner Sandstrom to recommend
approval of the Draft. Ordinance ATnendment regarding financial institutions.
Voting in favor: Chairman, Lucht, Ccrrnissloners Manson, Ainas, Sandstrom, and
Nelson. Voting against: none. The motion passed.
APPL ICATION , 110. 8 (NANKIN EXPRESS, I NC.)
The Secretary then introduced the last scheduled item of business, a request for
site and building plan and special use permit approval to remodel and install a
drive -up lane and window at the restaurant at 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard. The
Secretary reviewed the contents of the staff' report (see Planning Commission
Information Sheet for Application No. 84011 attached) . The Secretary noted that the
plan had been revised since the writing of the report to include landscape screening
along the westerly greenstrip of the site adjacent to Brooklyn Boulevard. The
Secretary, also explained that there is, no gutter presently on the site and that any
new curb wo - uld be straight curb rather than curb and gutter.
Chairman Lucht asked the applicant 1ze had anything to add. Mr. Tim Johnson
of Nankin Express, Inc. stated that he felt the report had been complete.
i r t
r
PUBLIC HEARING (Applicati No. 84011)
Chairman Lucht then opened the meeting for a public hearing and asked whether anyone
present wished to speak. Hearing none, he called for a motion to close the public
hearing.
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
Motion by Commissioner Ainas seconded by Commissioner Sandstrom to close the public
hearing. The motion passed unanimously. There followed a brief discussion
regarding landscape treatment. Chairman Lucht stated that he thought the Junipers
along he westerl r' r screening
to 1 reenst i were appropriate riate since the would provide sc
g Y g F FF F Y F
during the entire year. He suggested that Nankin put in a Norway Maple at the
northwest corner of the site. Mr. Johnson agreed with this recommendation.
ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLI NO. 84011 (Nankin Express, Inc
Motion by Commissioner Ainas seconded by Coma nissioner Manson to recommend approval
of Application No 84011 subject to the following conditions:
1. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes,
ordinances, and regulations and any violation thereof may be
grounds for revocation.
2. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building
Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance
of permits.
3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee
(in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be
submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure completion
of approved site improvements.
4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical
equipment shall be appropriately screened from view.
5. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to
Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances.
6. Curbing shall be provided around all parking and driving areas in
accordance with the recommendation of the City Engineer.
7. Colored fluorescent and spotlights along the mansard of the
building shall be removed prior to the issuance of permits.
Voting in favor: Chairman Lucht, Commissionersanson, Ainas, Sandstrom and nelson.
Voting against: none.
APPLICATI NO. 84009 AND 8 (Lombard Pro
The Secretary then introducecite� .item of business, a request for site and
building plan approval for a'75 sq. ft. low -rise office/industrial building at
6601 Shingle Creek Parkway and a request for a special use permit for 20 off -site
accessory parking stalls on the central parking lot to the west. The Secretary
reviewed the contents of the staff report (sec Planning Commission Information
Sheet for Application No. 84010 attached). The Secretary added that the staff had
requested revisions in the landscape plan which have not yet been submitted. He
rioted that these would include shade trees along the easterly greenstrip and a
5 -10 -84 _2_
,
^
hedgerow in that location. 8e also stated that the staff had recommended sod in the
landscape area. around the building with the c!xception of smaller compact rock mulch
areas ubere plantings could be located,
The Secretary pointed out that tbe only other 12 biob ceiling building, in the
Industrial Park io Shingle Creek Plaza II. The Secretary stated that the proposed
building i3 scnoemlhat experimental and oCahigher quality than any other building, in
the Industrial Park. He noted that the ap not expect to reach a 50
office occupancy, but that the staff 1a concerned that tenants will have o bieb
demand for office opeo8.
Commissioner Manson asked whether the Spec. 14 Building was being proposed first
because it is on Shingle Creek Parkway. ��� 3ecr�t�ry agreed with that assessment.
Commissioner 0eIsoo asked what the short fall and overall parking would be if Spec.
10 and Spec. l2 were also low-rise industrial buildings. The Secretary stated that
the difference in office occupancy between the two types of buildings is about 30%.
ZD response toaguea'� 1oofrmm Chairman Locbt regarding the master plan for the area,
the Secretary briefly discussed the allocation of parking oyareo from the central
parking lot t0 the various industrial buildings planned for the area. Be stated that
the central parking lot was well located if a ramp were to he built over it to serve
these buildings as well. He stated there could be Some question as to wbetber the
land in that area could physically support a ramp.
Chairman Lucht then called on the applicant to speak. Mr. Al Beioner Of Lombard
Properties pointed to the Palmer Labe pIeze building and Shingle Creek Plaza II
development as areas where office tenants have not created a problem. He stated that
8 high bay building does not necessarily translate into higher use of the space. He
stated that most tenants who are presently in high bay buildings could move into low-
rise buildings and that the lower ceiling is more energy efficient. 8e stated that
his company would be willing to build e ramp if it were demanded by a solid tenant
which expressed a need for additional parking. Hr. B81Duer explained that none of
the other Spec. buildings had reached a5O7, office occupancy io the past. lie stated
be felt that be was being penalized for something that had never taken oIooe.
Mr. Beisner went on to say that staff had not proven satisfactorily to him that Spec.
14 would need as many stalls as required by5O7, office occupancy. He added that it
would be nice for Lombard Properties if such au occupancy rate did occur, but that be
didn't think it would. Bc stated that the City of Bloomington takes a completely
different approach io limiting the a-mouotof parking that can be provided oo the site
while maximizing the building, Mr. Beiooer concluded his comments by raising the
question of compact oar parking. 8e stated that some accommodation for compact
o8r5 could allow more spaces to be provided.
Chairman LVcbt offered the idea 0frnnoiodioc the approval on the Spec. lO building
and entering into on agreement to put in a if that became necessary. Chairman
Lucht pointed out that the occupancy of these buildings changes over time and could
evolve into more office space. Mr. Goiooer acknowledged that some companies can
�
grow dramatically and employ more people than was ever envisioned when a lease was
entered into, Cba1rriian Luobt pointed out that more parking space available to a
site gives greater flexibility in leasing the building. Mr. Beiooer agreed but
added that empty parkinQ spaces arm an economic drain on a project. Mr. BeiDner
stated that B[npkIyo Cmnter has not had high office occupancy rates in its
ioduutriaI buildings. in response to , question from Commissioner Sandstrom
regarding a parking ramp, Br. Beim/or stated a parking ramywould not be a feasible
--
choice for one building. Cononiooiooer Soodmtrom suggested that mcentral parking
5-I0-84 -3-
..~_
`
ramp could serve a number of buildings in the overall master plan. Chairman [Ucbt
stated that the present review by the Planning Commission was an opportunity to
prevent problems in the future that min}�b arise i� all O� the buildings become
�
heavily office. The Secretary pointed out regarding the Palmer Like Plaza that it --
was given approval for office occupancy for LIP to 4O the gross floor area and that
some nfthe tenants can be purely of f ice uses. The Secretary also oIar1fied that a
parking ramp would not have to be built at the time Spec. 14 was constructed and
occupied, but at the time the City determines it is needed.
Mr. Beisner asked if the plans could be sent on to the City Council on the stipulation
that a ramp would be required if the City determined that it were necessary and that
it could be referred back to the Planning Commission if other partners in Lombard
Properties stated that they are not willing to build such a ramp. The Secretary
stated that there was a need for further review of the matter. He stated that the
staff feel that u 50-50 ratio between office and industrial use of the building is @
minimum to plan for. He pointed to the fact that io other communities, including
Brooklyn Park, similar buildings have had vary high rates of office 0couy8noy, Mr.
BeisDer raised the question of compact parking stalls. The Secretary stated that
be would prefer that the City wait until the standard car iosmaller. 80 stated that
the standard oar is presently about as large as the City's required parking stall.
Mr. Be1nD8r stated that he paid clone attention to the parking needs of his tenants
and that he would not wish to be caught short on parking. But, be added, he builds
for the rule and not the exception in tenant requirements. Chairman Lucht a�reed
that Hr. Beisner nbOuId build for the rule, but stated that the Commission asks that
he provides for the exception. 8c explained that the City does not wish Mr. BeiOoer
to put in more parking than is necessary, but that the option of a ramp should be
exueriaed if parking demand exceeds expectations.
Mr. Beiooer stated that be had flexibility in developing the area because of the
vacant land presently available. The Secretary noted that the vacant land would
someday be used up and that parking problems could require aramp. Chair,-Ilan Luoht
suggested that 3 ramp be planned tV provide proof-of-parkiog for the developments iD
this area. Mr. Beisner stated that be hoped the Planning Commission is correct io
its projection of office occupancy.
Commissioner Ainam cited aoimilar type ofdevelopment in Crystal and noted the use
of underground parking and o parking ramp. 88 stated that in the majority Of cases
underground parking was cheaper. Noting the high water table in this area, the City
Engineer stated that providing underground parking in this area could US t0o8b.
ACTION TABLING APPLICATION NO. 8 (Lombard Properties)
--------- ---' ��
Motion by Commissioner Nelson neonnoeo ny �oniusiouer Sandstrom to table
Application No. 84009 until a parking plan reflecting 5O7, office quoupeooy were
submitted. Voting in favor: Chairman Luobt, Commissioners Manson, Ainao,
Sandstrom and Neloon. Voting against: uoDe. The motion passed.
PUBLIC HEARING (Application No 940I0
� Chairman Lucht then o the me eting ----- 'for a public hearing; noted that On one wa's
�
present to speak; and asked for a motion to continue the public bearing.
�
CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING (Application 0o, 84010)
Motion by Commissioner -&in�ss seconded b/Ccrinnioo1ooerVlao�onto continue the public
�
hearing on Application 0o, 84010. The motion passed uoan1moUsly.
� 5-10-84 -4-
�
�
The Secretary noted that a special use porinit pertaining to the use of the building
16 'f 'I building. He recommended
would purely office uses to locate in the Spec. 1 1 ,
that the applicant come back with an application for a special use permit for this
type of occupancy.
ACTION TP APPL,ICATIN NO. 8 (!,( Properties)
FIO Manson to table
Application No. 84010. Voting in favor: Chairman Lucht, Commissioners Manson,
0
Ainas, Sandstrom and Nelson. The motion passed.
ADJOURNI ENT
Following a brief review of upcotmin,-, business items, there was a motion by
Co,72nissioner Manson seconded by Commissioner Alinas to adjourn the meeting of the
Planning Corfimission. The motion passed unanimously. The Planning Commission
adjourned at 9:39 P.m.
Chairman
5-10-84 -5-
�
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice i5 horebv given that a public hearing will be held on the 261h day of Juno"
1984 It _ at the City Ha\l, 6301 Shingle Cruzk Parkway t0 consider
an Zoning Ordinance rc,�rdinG th2 ClaJsifiC�tiVn of financial
institutions'
ORDINANCE NO'
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING
THE CLASSIFICATION OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIOMS
------'----'---------------------------'--------------------------'-----
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORU8IN AS FOLLOWS:
Section l. Chapter 35 of the City DrdinunCps is hereby amcnd2d in the
following manner:
Section 35-312' R3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT.
'--------------
3 3 ilU
. �{u�����-_szes
C. Office uses not more 1 two stories in heiSht and which are
described in 3pction 35-320, Subsection l (b) [ (c) - through ] /d\
and l /i\ through l /S\. Such office us es shall be subject
1O the reqmircmePtl sTt forth in Section 35-411.
Section 2. Chapter 35 is further amended in the following manner:
Section 35-320- Cl SERVICE/OFFICE DISTRICT.
l' Permitted Uses
u, Fioanci�l in�titu1inu5 inCl dix but t limited to full-service
__- `- .�� ~ ..~ ...
�dn�� �nd ���i� d l Li
_-_-_--__-���-r|��.��/x_ /z������(��
Section 3. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances is also amended in the
following manner.
Section 35-704' MINIMUM PARKING SPACES REQUIRED.
2, C0oxierce
C. Other retail stores or centers and financial institutions:
Section 4. This ordinance shall become offeC1fYE after adOptinn and
upon thirty /30\ days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day Of l9 .
-_-___-
naJv/
ATTEST:
����v ---------------- ------------------'
D61e of Puh7izJtion
''''-------------------- ------
Lfhociivr kCo
/Uodcrli�� iodicaLes Aru zzitrr, br-cots is/icoie m0ter to be de102d'\
Planning Commission information Sheet
Application No. 84011
Applicant: Nankin Express
Location: 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard
Request: Site and Building Plan /Special Use Permit
The applicant requests site and building plan and special use permit approval to re-
model and add a drive -up window to tho existing restaurant at 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard.
The property in question is zoned C2 and is bounded on the north by the Green Mill
Restaurant:, on the east by a private road serving businesses between Brooklyn Boule-
vard and Xerxes Avenue North, on the south by Farrell's, and on the west by Brooklyn
Boulevard. The property is presently occupied by the Happy Dragon restaurant and
was the subject of Application No. 03039 by Zantigo Mexican Restaurants for a very
similar remodeling and drive -up proposal. Nankin Express is defined as a convenience
food restaurant under the City's Zoning Ordinance and as such requires special use
permit approval.
The proposed plan calls for 60 dining seats and 34 parking stalls. The parking
formula for restaurants is one stall per two seats plus one stall per two employees.
Staff have not received an employee count as requested, but presume it will be under
eight. The plan also calls for a drive -up lane along the south side of the building
and turning in front of the east side of the building where the drive -up window is
located. The drive -up lane is bounded by a 3' wide concrete median, consistent with
other drive - uplanes in the vicinity.
Proposed landscaping consists of one new 2" diameter tree of unspecified type
(consistent with existing species) at the northwest corner of the site, five unidenti-
fied shrubs around the base of the freestanding sign at the southwest corner of the
site, and sodding in greenstrip areas adjacent to the east property line. City
Ordinance (Section 35 -711) requires that off - street parking lots for over 6 cars
across a street from residentially zoned property shall be screened in a manner ap-
proved by the City Council. Staff recommend that such screening be accomplished
with no less than honeysuckle shrubs planted 3' on center in the greenstrip adjacent
to Brooklyn Boulevard.
Site drainage presently flows across the east property line onto the private access
road serving this development and from there overland to public storm sewer in
55th Avenue North. Since all the businesses in this block of Brooklyn Boulevard
drain in this same manner, no change in the drainage pattern is recommended. It
should also be noted that the concrete median surrounding the drive -up lane will
have a small opening as it turns around the building to allow water to drain into
the private access road. Staff recommend that the median be widened on the east
side to better delineate the parking stalls to the east of the building.
Few changes are proposed for the exterior of the building. Wood corner trim to be
painted red will be added to the corners of the mansards over the west, south, and
east sides of the building. Also, windows along the west, south, and east walls,
that were covered with aggregate panels by the present owner, will be uncovered.
Staff recommend two additional changes. There is a low flat - roofed area above the
kitchen on the north side of the building with no mansard around it. Roof -top
mechanical equipment is clearly visible and we recommend that it be screened, con. -
sistent with City policy. Also, there are colored flourescent lights under the
trim along the west and south sides of the building and colored spot lights on
the mansard. Staff regard this lighting as being, in effect, signery which has
never been approved. Our feeling is that it should be removed because it is not
5 -10 - 84 -1-
Application No. 84011 continued
consistent with other restaurants (namely Arthur Treachers and McDonalds) which
proposed such building treatments and were denied by the City Council.
Altogether, the plans are generally in order and approval is recommended subject to
at least the following conditions:
1. The special use permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances,
and regulations and any violation thereof may be grounds for revocation.
2. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building
Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of
permits.
3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in
an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted
prior to the issuance of permits to assure completion of approved
site improvements.
4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical
equipment shall be appropriately screened from vies
5. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to
Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances.
6. Curbing shall be provided around all parking and driving areas in
accordance with the recommendation of the City Engineer.
7. Colored flourescent and spotlights along the mansard of the building
shall be removed prior to the issuance of permits.
5 -10 -84 -2-
Planning Commission Information Sheet
1) icat.ion i,o. 84009
Applicant; Lombard Properties
Location: 6601 Shingle Creek Parkway
Request: Site and Building Plan
The applicant requests site and building plan approval for an office - industrial build-
ing on a site to be addressed 660( Shingle Creek PetrkY .lay. The property in question is
zoned I -I and is bounded by Shingle Creek Parkway on the east, by the Spec. 11
industrial bui ?ding on the north and by vacant industrially zoned land on the west
and south (this vacant; land is presently planned for a central parking lot on the west
and restaurant sites on the south). The building is to be known as the Spec. 14
industrial building. The parcel of land on which it is to be built is legally de-
scribed by a recent subdivision as Tract G of an as- yet - unnumbered Registered Land
Survey which is approximately 4.4 acres in area.
The roposed landscape plan call for 11 S plendor r trees and 11 Spring Snow
P 1 s o Red S 1e �lor C ab ees a
P P P P g
Crab trees in the front greenstrip aong Shingle Creek Parkway and in large land=
shaped islands bordering driveways to the north and south of the building. Some of
the Crabs along Shingle Creek Parkvray will be changed to larger shade trees. There
are also numerous plantings proposed around the building. These include: Broadmoor
Juniper (46), 'Wilton Carpet Junipers (72), Prince of Wales Junipers (24), Red Bar-
berry (32), and Gold Drop Potentil ?a (20). There are also three (3) Black Hills
Spruce to the west of the building which will serge as partial screening of the
loading dock area. Underground irrigation is indicated in all sodded areas. Rock
mulch is scheduled in planting areas adjacent to the building and in a narrow parking
delineator
on the south side of the site.
The grading plan calls for water to drain mostly toward the outer edges of the site
except for the loading dock area on the westerly portion of the site. Drainage
from the east side of the site will be conveyed via storm sewer to City storm sewer
in Shingle Creek Parkway. Drainage from the west side of the site will be conveyed
via private storm sewer westerly to Shingle Creek.
The proposed building is a u- shaped, low -rise (12' high ceiling rather than 20' to
26') office - industrial building. The exterior will be face brick on all sides of the
building, except in the loading dock area, which will be scored concrete block in a
color to match the brick. The loading docks are to be located inside the "U ",
hidden from view from the street and most neighboring establishments. The plans note
that the building will be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to
meet N.F.P.A. standards and that roof mechanical equipment shall be screened.
q r�
Security lighting is indicated on all sides of the building about every 50 to 75'.
No r
othe site lighting is indicated,
The main issue to review with the proposed application is parking. The proposed
building is 75,250.8 sq. ft. in gross floor area. The applicant proposes a mix of
20;0 office and 80 warehouse use. This results in a parking requirement of 15,050.1
sq. ft. office : 200 = 76 spaces, plus 60,200.7 sq. ft. warehouse ; 800 = 76 spaces
for a total of 152 required spaces. The site plan provides for 145 spaces on site
and 20 additional spaces off -site on the central parking lot to the west for a total
of 165 spaces. This total would allow a potential office occupancy of about 25 %.
Staff believe, however, that low -rise industrial buildings are much different than
the typical high -bay office -- warehouse building. It is our recommendation that the
parking requirement be based on 50 office occupancy and 50% warehouse. This recom-
mendation, is based on the following factors:
5 -10 -84 -1-
Application No. 84009 continued
a) Other communities in Hennepin County that have had construction of
low -rise industrial buildings say that office occupancy is in the
range of 50"0-75'/0 of gross floor area.
b) Tenants who are heavily into warehousing are more likely to seek out
high -bay buildings which offer more cubic area per square foot leased.
c) Low -rise buildings, on the other hand, tend to attract office tenants
and tech manufacturing firms which often produce goods that are small
in size, but use a fair amount of labor per sq. ft. of building space,
thus requiring more parking. Storage is a minor factor in building
utilization.
As a result of these factors, we believe that a special use permit should be required
for this type of building in the 1 -1 zone and that a parking requirement based on 50%
office, 50% warehouse is the minimum acceptable, especially since the 1 space /800
sq. ft. warehouse formula is probably inadequate for space that is predominantly de-
voted to manufacturing rather than storage. The parking requirement based on a 50/50
split is 37,625 208.8 = 180 plus 37,625 _ 800 = 47 for a total of 227 spaces, 62
more than proposed by the applicant. The lack of parking stalls on the basis of
staff's calculations leads to consideration of a number of options:
1) Accept the proposal as submitted and require no special use permit.
2) Deny the plan as proposed.
3) Table the plan and ask the applicant to shrink the building and submit
an application for a special use permit.
4) Table the plan and ask the applicant to provide an expanded proof -of-
parking plan including at least 70 more spaces from the central
parking lot and submit an application for a special use permit.
Staff certainly do not recommend Option No. l and believe Option No. 2 can be avoided
if the applicant is willing to pursue either Option No. 3 or No. 4. The applicant
has indicated to staff that he does not wish to shrink the building, but rather to
expand parking available to this use. To do so under the present circumstances
would require that the approval of the as- yet- unbuilt Spec.10 be rescinded and that
a substantial share of the parking presently allocated to Spec. 10 be reallocated to
Spec. 14. This, however, would leave Spec. 10 with insufficient parking, even under
the old assumption for Spec. 10 of a high -bay building with 20'10" office and 80% ware-
house space. The situation is comiplicated by the fact that the applicant has in-
dicated to staff an intention of making Spec. 10 and Spec. 12 low -rise buildings as
well. f=inally, the applicant is in an awkrv, position because subdivision and
ownership of the land in this area was, to a great extent predicated on the
assumption that a certain amount of building pace was possible given a certain
9 �' p 9
l
amount of land. These assum �tions just won't fit if the low —rise buildings bear
P J g
out the occupancy trend in other local conimunities.
The applicant has suggested that perhaps a parking ramp could be built if parking
demand reaches staff's expectations. A potential parking ramp was accepted by the
City for proof -of- parking purposes in the case of the Northv, Racquet and Swim
Club last year. Perhaps such an arrangement could be accepted in this area also
provided appropriate legal and financial guarantees sere obtained. We would recommendle
in addition, however, that the approval of Spec. 10 be rescinded and that no approval
of Spec. 12 be considered until tine central parking lot is in place and functioning.
Because of these questions and cericerns, staff rr>coinmend that the application be
tabled and that the applicant be requested to s!�bmit application for a special use
permit and new plains which comprehend sufficir_nt parking based on a 50/50 ratio of
office to indu striel space. >
♦
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 84010
Applicant: Lombard Properties
Location: Tract C, R.L.S. 1564
Request: Special Use Permit
The applicant requests special use permit approval for 20 off -site accessory parking
spaces on the central parking lot to the crest of the proposed Spec. 14 site. The
proposed off -site accessory parking spaces are to be located on Tract C, R.L.S. No.
1564, the northerly and larger of two tracts that make up the central parking lot.
The proposed off -site parking meets all the criteria for off -site parking set forth
in Section 35 - -701 (3) (attached). As noted in the information sheet for Application
No. 84009, the development plan proposes 145 parking spaces on -site in addition to
the 20 spaces off -site for a total of 165 spaces. Also as mentioned in the staff
report for No. 84009, we do not believe a total of 165 spaces will prove to be
ad}quate. It is recommended that this application, along with No. 84009, be tabled
until the parking issue is resolved.
5 -10 -84
M & C NO. 84 --06
May 18, 1984
FPOC TEE OFFICE O THE CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: Tyndale Avenue Improve.lient 4le�.ring
To the Honorable Piayor ar.d City Council.:
On Friday 4r. Tony Schmidt submitted petitions signed by Lyndale Avenue
neighborhood r gird r }„ th_ various projects proposed and which will be heard at your
14ionday night meeting. By way of the petitions are 100'i"o against the
sidewalk and only one: favorable si l rnaturc> for the road and one favorable signature
for - the water improvement. Mnile we haven't completely validated all petitions,
it's obvious they are almost unanirr;ously against the improvements.
Mr. Knapp and I rave discussed various alternatives available to the City Council on
P evening, and they are as follows:
1. Order the improvement.
2. Defer decision on the project to later on this year to allow for further
neighborhood discussion.
3. Abandon the project completely.
4. Abandon the current proposed project and instruct the City staff to submit
the project road design to 111NI /DOT for appropriation of turnback funds.
. This alternative would kill the project for 1985 to allow for neighborhood
discussion and cor,m�unication. The earliest the project, or any portion of
it, could be resurrected with a new public hearing would be sometime prior
to spring of 1985•
5. Some combination of the above.
In our discussions with people in the neighborhood there seems to be considerable
confusion about some aspects of the project. There also exists considerable
problems in applying our current assessment policies to reconstruction or
rehabilitation street and utility projects similar to this. We are recommending
the fourth alternative for the Council's consideration. We are recommending the
Council deny the current improvement project, thus killing this project for
construction in 1985. However, we are recommending that you authorize us to
proceed with11N/DOT to establish appropriation for turnback funding. The process
for obtaining turnback funding is that a project is eligible for no longer than five
years, but that does not mean there is appropriated money available to do the
project. This would allow us to get our project on the list for turnback funding
while we have an opportunity to examine our assessment policy problems and other
neighborhood concerns.
We are still encouraging people to attend the hearing and discuss any concerns they
have, but it would be our recommendation that the Council deny this project. for 1985
construction and authorize us to proceed with appropriation process for turnback
funding.
}lespectfully submitted,
Gerald G. Splinter
City Manager
i
introc?ucE�`l t.hr. following re;:;olution and
MOVcd its ad
ry:�SO TJTI("'N NO.
1 - tESO?,UTIO OI DEIPING :1" I RC) JF _,N 7 ND PREPARATION OF PId1NS
O' S FOR 1'' ".1' C" JI,;.. °; [' P C JI.CTS NOS. 1984 - i�8,
W . 1 31] E'AS, R-- sol ution No. 84 -67 adopted the 23rd day of April, 1984,
fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed construction of water
main, street, and sideway; improvements along Lynd.ale Avenue between 53rd and
57th Avenues; and
' e no
Lice of the hearing through two weekly
Wi EREAS, ten day's publish d g
publications of the - required notice was given, and the hearing was held thereon
on the 21st day of '-'ay, 1984, at which time all persons desiring to be heard
were given an oppor'.anity to be heard thereon.
NOW, TFIERErORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brookly Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The following improvements as proposed in Council Resolution No.
84 -67 adopted the 23rd day of April, 1984 are hereby ordered and
shall be constructed:
WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1984 -08
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1984• -09
. SIDEWALK I1 ENT PROD ECT NO. 1984 -11
2. The City Engineer is designated as the engineer for this improvement.
He shall prepare plans and specifications for these improvements.
_ Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution by
was duly Y
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
voted and the following t aga inst the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
I Ni� i A J I
t t: or
C-it of BrooLl (:enter
1"L : - 53rd A. Tcnue North
ain
I Cr 5 "*) 05
5501. 1, vnot,. I I
Mir. ( i"Irs. I"I'LIC0 HcIldry
53 hyml ilc
Romnin 1'. ficyn 531.5 Lvi-Jka 1 1
17""i ce P--tor 5 331 Ly") "I'a I e
.kmela. Fiala 5600 L; �ldale
Kon Kunz 5601 Lyn CVI 1. e
P,o b Murphy 5007 LviIel,-ilc
stle CCiLll S 5 0 Lyndale
Virginia 111-dberg 557.0 1-y
Ninc
- IJale
Bogor G E1,JXle Gurley S 1 9 L)rndale
Ken Bomiett 5421 L) - ndale
G, 1 Kasinar 5559 Lyndale
1. Introduction of City staff and mceting fon
2. General Introduction of Proposed Projects
A. Mater
1. Connection of 2 Ynnins (on-- at 57th and one at 53rd)
2. Inch-ides sen lines �-,nd hydrmits
3. Line rm on west side for -, blocks F, cross over to east
to avoid utilities as required by Health Department Regulatlions
B. Street
1. P .emove eX i( r 0 ro
s t i1A (T roadwa� and construct now street - 9 ton a w, y
2. Concrete Curb C, Gutter
3. 1�idtjj I to 1 -- 28 feet - Presently is 24 to
4. Aver street width in Broohlyii Center is 3 0'
S In order to include parking hino by MSA stmida ds it would have
to be -10
C. Parking Stalls
1. Pr�sent,�tion of parallel F, diahon, 1. desimis (t ,;o exhib its)
- Ats)
f d4t�iO31S for StI]IS (see exhibit)
2. ' _, , O CO), �I ,
3. Rovicl% Of PrOlAmin'll Parkinc Stall Request Forl"i exhibit)
3. Project Schedule Review (SO-0 0
4. Review of Tot,),1 Pi Cost (sco exhibit)
S, Si�cclal Assc
A. Umisii imo"Int of specil-11. prol)J.Cm. i Coll_ i t lolls
B. Fin:ll ion of III' !do by C�itN 7 Council
C. is I'Cilel'it 1(, the rn)l�,
oxi)], (tlw exhibits)
advisell the residents
Ce
thNL if tK y h%ve u V
nw) A 001 diffic"Y l.ith t ile " - S( S "( ury
Ccmyn Pv Nuticilave refs 0n; i 11, nea Future, they -should be
d( n:' iw"Fore I'm street is ruzoislynni(O 01; tile (ni pense will be gTON1017
Jill after thy KpruVcmQwt is cOrTlut
fojin w inn is a si=Nry of the rajor questions and answers as discussed at
various points in the meeting.
If si('_ewalk is put in, co uld it b 4 blocks?
in oil only 2 of the
A: Yes, however cur recd nnelidation at this time !,s, for the whole area.
Q: Vlat type of curb i f,qitter will be insl F whore will the sidewalk
be located in relation to the curb E,
Al curb Q gutter with a 5 inch vcrtical Face will be installed; not the
sloped face type as in some sections of the City. There will be an
8 foot green strip between the curb I the sidewalk edge.
Q: 1"'hat, v;ill in the cases, where the sl opes SO much that when
the sidewalk is installed, it leaves a su b s t an tial grade difference
between the wcalk and the lawn adjacent to it?
A: The city will provide short w Ills if necessary.
Q: 1 about trees? Will the City relocate them or just cut them dove?
A: We will be able to work around most of them. if necessary the sidewalk
will go around them. Absolute stra li s qwalhs are not a
requirement. However, the loss of a few trees is unavoidable.
Q: What are the orange states that are i place place now marking?
A: They are marking w are assulcd, at this point, to be property Irons.
Q: Oiat are tur.aback funds? 1 jurisdiction the) provide
A: Whon the, State gives back a roadway for ?Municipa
f to improve that roadway.
Q: Hole did Lyndale Avenue (in Minneapolis south of 53rd) got the improvements
illa-Je without char,ging the residents?
� Iuch Of - 11 co
A: t he , � Or k was done by t he St as p of t 194 co str i t on.
rams made available
t j lc �, 111 use of special federal grant PrOg ;rams or
to t SU mloapo li s assess1 , , , ,cllt policy is -substantially diff than
Brooklyn Center's policy - of any other Cj policy. As a result, I Miruloapolis
property tax rates are higher than 111 Center's.
Q: I th that financing assessments t t h e Cit was supposed, to be a
better deal. Mly is tile interest rate so high?
A: The i n t eres t rate is estimated as 12. The Cit es timates wo'll have to pay
s and 2 is add - tj xi ) 011 s
e s. 0 for r'L"Illicip'll bond adde FOl7 _1 11r i ll' i str , _ 0 , )011- If the
City can sell bonds at a lower rate, thi ra will be lower.
Q: A re the assessment rates as stated ill thce handout accurate?
A: The water miin assessment rates are firm. Th s 6 curb 6 gutter
assessaynt rate is an estimate only, however we try to estimate on the
high side so there are no unpleasant surprises.
Q: Is men I including Wntur main, street curb gutter
akw
A: It &PTIM unkyaly on each individiml 1011MUM1. plicase contact us
0 and fj%uiv , your munrud ;nsesyana for you.
Q: ma tin dwerynce hotween state Aid funds and Turnlxicl; frauds?
A: Statc Aid ,, are Kloil& yeirly. lurnkick funds are only allotted
occ;
11y;Pver, the standards foi.
constriM ion 'ind for use arc 010 same. For exanTIC, we
can only use the turubach funds if we con.' a 9 ton, 1-0, ad wa, Y-
Q: Is that 9 ton axle weight or vehicle weight?
A: Axle weight.
Q. You mean that all those years Lyndolo was used as a state highway it was
not a ton roadway?
A: That is true. it is sonovibeTc between 5 ton and 9 ton. Probably 7 ton
or more.
Q: Will residents he able t d on lojidaj.c Wring construction?
A: The City re(pires the Continctor to provide access at the end of each day.
Also, any trenches that are dlug must be closed up prior to the end of
each cI y. Every effort will to made to Soo that the roadway is as
driveable as possible. Some loss of access is unavoidable.
Q: Those of us that have property on both sides, are we to be doubly assessed?
A: Yes. At this point staff has advised the Council that current policy indicates
that these properties should be assessed for both frontages for the street
inipro�el» .as (io. - curb and gutter aild street surfacillg). 110WOver, if
agroomonts can be reached to assure that parcels on the river side will not
be developed, we recommend that the assessment be reduced.
Regarding the water main assessments for these properties, staff is recommending
that no assessments be levied against any parcel of property which cannot be
developed without a variance. In this case the City would propose to lev
hoohaT charges against those properties only if mrid when a variance is
granted allowing dovolopiriont on such parcels.
Q: Can we pay the assessment in full- before it's assessed and if so how long
do we have?
A: Yes you can pay the assessment in full anytime within 30 days after the
assessmen ro ll i a d o pt e d, b the Council (this would occur in the fall of
19841. After 50 days until the first of the year interest will be figured
to the day that you pay. After the first of the year the first year's full
interest w be charged.
Q: Minn I needed to put in a new we ll a short time ago I had to sign a statement
saying that I would not oppose the water main coming in. Why did the City
rocluire that,, 1 (10 that?
A: The City wanted you to be Llware of the possibility of water main installation
st ill ex an d th j b ecause we a ll ow ed you to drill your well did
not romi you 1,Ould 'ho exeny from charges associated with w'a'ter Inaill installati-
ill your area.
Q: How call we host show City Staff belwoN, IRm i nj i the Public date how
we reel. about ilw proposed ]n-ojocts? Sh we submit petitions or letters?
A: Petition Q letter are two wAys. The PM c rfect ive imuld he your attNklanco.
at TV 1161 is Hcyrin�o.
Q: If I signed Ihn sLatrualo MW not (qyrzinq the water main project will. ITTY
si3plily! a palil i rn agaillA it he dKrC!y1rWl by the (:it) SUFF?
A: Not at 01. If ,rich a fn ,fiti cy i p lrj;cn p j l, w e will prolably present the
0111 Pn analy"is silknAng via) K the J)' I)Ut 11011 the
fact that such NSTccTrnt_s Wvc Run 02nccl.
lln'i-" do the Coined assessment rates cony)arc with other construction in
the Ci ty. My seem N little MIX
A: Wye is ivry Jitticl ncn; cmis11uCti-cin (_, on in the City, However, the
We, blijor, 691h to 70th mor voin installation rate is identical. A street
improycrant pyoject, by St. Alphonnus church, Mcithling curb Q gutter, has a
considerably hIghor rate for a lower sundard roadway not a 9 ton roadway).
Q: Onc sum pa '.'1i: as opposed to 10 or 20 year financing is quite an extreme.
Is there any way we can have other options for paymont such as dividing it into
4 equal dnstallmtints?
A: Yes it is possible that Council could Wror other options. This has been the
policy in the post and the Coun.cil has QW! pretty tightly to it, but t.L1, -
y TIC',
N - n a
do change. Me possibilit hi
y which exists now is for a Property 01 % Or to pa
one assessment (either for water mvin or for street 1,1 on a lumip
sum basis and to pay the other on <ul , instillment basis.
Q: VTiy have we been given no option for i% main only?
A: Options can he considered however, at this point City staff is recommending
the total packago because installing water main only will disturb about
25 to 501 of the street surface. A separate street project at a later date
would result in the duplication of costs.
Q: Regarding the deferred assessment program, does interest still accrue
during the tire the assessment is deferred?
A: Yes.
Q: hill the discussions tonight go on record?
A: Yes, the outline of what was covered as well as the questions and answers
will be typod up and distributed to the Councilmombcrs-
Q: Will the unpro'��olnontt of the roadway affect police coverage in the area?
A: I have jiscussod the project with the Chief of Police and he feels there
should be little if any eff ect on the speed of yohiclos through the area,
either to increase or to decrease that speed. The sidewalk should provide
added safety for pedestrians, however. Also, the plaiting of trees may
have a long-tern effect of reducing speeds.
t
y
z
{
}
t
0 1
i
4 1 4
' _-- CONCRETE C;aP,S
ANID GUT T �R // I
1
t 0' 1 2_5
+ TYP;CA;_ SING' E TAPE R
PARKI air " L'_
i
4
7
r 4
4
SCALE: 1"=!O*
� A
4
i(.�0 z
x
f
S o t
GGNCR TE CU r,3 � `'� 0
E n � � �, �i ,'� �. 3' s G i 'y'. � z - L .`. ;:f G UT T L s i
A ^D GUT T ER —
4s '
Jq
4
t
T"YPI C]AL /-'
E
'm N
y
i
i
S
f
Co'� C T i�j "T 1 0
A,
y c G I'l I F(D L
I L C Lo I
1. A DEQUAT STk'E EL T F, I G I iT ,Y E— MIS TS, G'R T! I E RE Q UEST I ',
P RO P ERITY �l IER Pi OV IDE RECD 1 [:.ASE i !ITS AT NO COST
TO THE CITY,
2. THE CITY El'lG'ji DIETERI' THIPT PROP11"R DRAINhGE PATTERNS
CAN BE flli, THROUG,"i SUCH �AYS-
3. THE CITY ENGINEER DETEP\' TIIAT SAFE AND PROPER SLOPES
CAN BE MIAINTAI[I'ED IN THE BOULEVA1,D AREAS,
4. THE PROPERTY 0 AGREES TO PAY ADDI TI0 SPECIAL ASSESSl
COVERING THE ADDITIONAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION,
(NOTE: TURNMACK IFUNDS 1 NOT BE USED FOR THIS PURPOSE.)
5 E THE PROPERTY M'I'NER UNDERSTAINIDS AND AGREES THAT ANY SUCH
, ON—STREET PARKING SPACES ARE PUDLIC PPRlK'lNlG SPACES WHICH
ARE SUBJECT TO TIHE SAi RULES AND REGULATIONS ti','HICH APPLY
TO ANY OTHER ON—STREET PARKING AREAS �'IITHI% THE CITY.
PRE L I M I NARY t, i1 Z ( � ���� ���. � �. `�� I �C"�(' I`(� (ate
P {stw.Lj,l ( ! ,�,i ING 1� �..�taES h i V1 1 i
Nil r-
A ", 1R E:_SS '
AS OWNER OF THE RESIDENCE LISTED ABOVE, HEREBY REQUEST THAT
THE C ITY OF BR OOKLYN CENTER P 'fRC)`,IDE THE TYPE ANN NUMBER OF
PARKING S TALL(S) ALONG MY PROPERTY AS INDICATED BELOW,
(PLEASE FILL IN THE BLANKS)
PARALLEL PARKING STALK IS (ARE) REQUESTED.
DIAGONAL PARKING STALKS) IS (ARE) REQUESTED.
IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE C WILL CONTACT ME REGARDING THE
F E A S I B I L I T Y OF THE DESIRED PARKING STALL CONSTRUCTION , FURTHER,
IF ALL CONDITIONS NECESSARY FOR THE PARKING STALL CONSTRUCTION
ARE MET, AGREE TO ENTER INTO A FORVAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY
TO PROVIDE FOR STALL CONSTRUCTION AND PAYMENT OF ALL RELATED
COSTS.
r u cl :,'91,11 -E
INEORI- It1TIOc AI. MIFLTIN'G MAY 9, 1984
PU�13LIC FfyRING rAY 21, 1954
CONTRACT AWARD JULY 9, 1984
PROaGCT START UP JULY 3011 1954
VIATER MAlN COMP LETION AUGUST 24, 1984
STREET COMPLETION SEP TEMBER 28, 1984
SIDEVIALK C01 OCTOBER 5, 1984
FINAL CLEAN UP OCTOBER 19, 1984
LY i,tD n L AVE NUE ° jiR 'tfE X41' i' L�
ESTIMAT COSTS
WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO, 1984 -08 $ 67, 500
EN P ROJ E CT ,� 984— KO KO
STREET f�r�CT I k��� ��O , �.I�e_�YT
SIDEVALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO- 1984 -10 $ 42,590
TOTAL $392,600
ADDITIONAL COSTS DRIVEWAY APRON C ONSTRUC`(`ION
PARKING STALL CONSTRUCTION
SERVICE LINES TO MULT (- (PROPERTY
0
RATE $2, (INCLUDES SERVICE LINE
1*0 PROPERTY LINE)
198L,t IYULTI FAMIlLY AN'D RATE FOOT
7.621100 SQUARE FEET
SERVICE LINE COST
PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
FOR WATER MAIN
PAYMENT PERIOD = 20 YEARS
ESTIMATED INTEREST RATE 12%
ASSESSMENTS ARE CERTIFIED To HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR COLLECTION
WITH PROPERTY TAXES
FIRST PAYMENT WILL BE DUE WITH 1955 TAXES
TYP IC AL SCITAULE OF F';!YUNTS i ON MUMMY E MMY RE IDENCE
ANNUAL. P R I N C I P A L PAYMENT 20 = $120/YEAR
is 3:• .. ,. db •� i? .. •�• 9" � •;� ;E .< 3; •;� }•
IST INTEREST PAYMENT U S AN E::ST I I ;TED 15 MONTH PERIOD)
$2,400 x ,12 x 15/ = $360,00
ESTIMATED TOTAL, 1ST PAYI = $
2ND INTEREST PAYMENT
$228a x 112 = $273,60
ESTIMATED TOTAL, 2ND PAYMENT $39160
11TH INTEREST PAYMENT
$1,200 x ,12 = $144,00
ESTIMATEIa TOTAL, 11TH PAYMENT = $264,06
20TH INTEREST PAYMENT
120 x A2 - HM
a
ESTIMATH TOTAL. F INAL PAYMENT = $
C (.
STR E ET ~ $21, 78 /LF
CURS GUTTER - $12, 20 /LF
DRI 4AY - $35,00/SY
PARI <I SIG STALL - $700
PAYf',ENIT SCHEDU"ILE FOR SPECIAL ASSESSi-IE 3T FOR STREET
AND CURB AND GUTTER
PAYMENT PERIOD ~ 10 YEARS
STINIATED INTERcST RATE. 12%
ASSESSMENTS ARE CERTIFIED TO HENINEPIN COUNTY FOR COLLECTION
WITH PROPERTY TAXES -
FIRST PAYMENT `'TILL BE DUE V11 TH 1985 TAXES
ES11MAIED
WAIT I H UED)
TYPICAL SCITBULE OF PAYMENTS FOR $3,000 TOTAL ASSESSMENT
ANNUAL PRINCIPAL PAYMENT $3,000 i 16 = $ 3OO/YEAR
1sT INTEREST PAYMENT (FOR AN ESTIMATED 15 moili PERIOD)
$3,000 x 12 x 15/12 $450.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL, 1ST PAYMENT = $750,00
2ND INTEREST PAYMENT
$2,700 x 12 = $324,00
ESTIMATED TOTAL, 2ND PAYMENT = $624.00
6TH INTEREST PAYMENT
$1,500 x 12 = $180.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL, 6TH PAYMENT $480.00
10TH INTEREST PAYMENT
$300 x J2 = ?36,00
ESTIMATED TOTAL FINAL PAYMl: = $336.00
I h.y,l t}vr , ' :K•l. !' 'li . .'t. �sr . ,ll ".'i -• �::: ^ )'i.r7; ".'ltlnn'tt) t!V'
rt, tJ, t .. :,1 C
r' ,;y ,rit'; Crt t}, t tt.y e {ar
'17.
7 ('r ^) c�z ally fcr r ?c•frrr !: of ::,> ,i:,t ;i - ._�'i;t;�(. c., f �lcr.,.,.
X.G V+ f Ir r ;:: �`. 'Ib t21 Iti"ottnt
I —
for i 7 (onr) Fropc rty c ' n:: ilxxi as:
Lot Block 1:33ition _
I.D. tb.
I ('r +e) t '.erste: *:d tat t h et.ti ^^ t Cc'(—,r t_`:,; , ,•rr:t o` s _tial a. >__ss I s}al.i
ter tsi - =.te and all a., . `.s 2 c L , :t at p' s 1 . _:,.,.c interest, tail }max e c L vn
oxurrence of any of o: rtti in . _..::e -r `_a Statutcs 435.105: (a)
t.h_ a�ath of thz v 7 _ , .u_
� a:x_:c.__^ riot elicit;le for the
(b) C} s -Ile, a r -`c of s r v'-,.... cf c y or ny r' }. cflz; (C) is the yr
erty s uld for - u,; r ,< n lose its 'tr:. - . vid s + :uF;; cr (dl, if For r:::y reason tiv- Cit,• or
PZD:J;1yr, Cx .t: shall :_..ucL, ire Uhat tls�re ,x:, , 4 e rxo }at:7 :i.p to requir.0 r late or
F arLial. payr:ent.
1be anrunt of rnnov r-y (our) has rcIcc,ivc--i fr W, all S�urcc — c.i itlg tax'- year
anding JL= 30, 19 is listed belcnq.
Salaries and Vi, cs
- %cL Security
Veterans Benefits
Cthnr Fk ti zc� :1 r
Ibn^y flan Rants
Lhl.o } ^.L':1t lrs zcti i ,
S'br?ar2:.'s C--.7ens?ticn
Disability ECTefits
Stock Dividenc:s or
lntcrest
All Wi er
'AML CP ALL I\ti"lc`�
I (FY) h XT- t+1 forc<�Oitil st- and the arswors ttuc'e, aril urc'es crrn
of Frrjury, c?- lire t1rYC to tx, true arxi cor:c� t to the best of ;.. }, (our) kmole.�e and telief.
Suk rih aus3 C 11 to t--fore re
this day of: , Szcgk�ttvz. os 1I l%cant
19
fa.�tat I1z1��ic
�' — zc:rkititry of l���ic�int
Iw7}'1i I'iti�1l'1"Y:
in milli in,t any st;ittsi cn;tl r t•ritta�n, fi:irh is ii.�Tu;i d or autls�ri :o ty
1aw t 1,� P Klo a,i ;k htsi!; of iricu,utl, 11 m 1, of .ti»t irrt "niy tuts of i .. :'•rmrnt, infra^
tit nuLr^ .ur �a.tt.rnt t.z .ur, i•,tl, t i.il ,,. ,. },,' }.n ". rs Lil :.• rrry
ftt�,�l, t•tlr. :�• C I tt;i;.. I , n •..i,�,l l,�, I.n:, t,t t ri t 1 . t"i rrv tfIIll npo y it or to
IYtyiutttt, UI. a titx, tit iiA, i,i ` t),nt 1,i1!)U, nt t„tn." Sit', 609.41 I•llii :,te'trth : t t1U11a, I9tt.
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION TERMINATING LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROCEEDINGS FOR
PROJECTS NOS 198 - 08 AN 1984 -09
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 84 -67 adopted the 23rd day of April, 1984,
fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed construction of water main,
street, and sidewalk improvements along Lyndale Avenue between 53rd and
57th Avenues; and
WHEREAS, ten day's published notice of the hearing through two weekly
publications of the required notice was given, and the hearing was held thereon
on the 21st day of May, 1984, at which time all persons desiring to be heard
were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the members of the City Council that
additional time and discussion are needed to allow for a re- evaluation of the
City's special assessment policies:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The local improvement proceedings regarding the following
improvements which were initiated by Resolution No. 84 -67 pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 are hereby terminated:
Lyndale Avenue Water Main Improvement Project No. 1984 -08
Lyndale Avenue Street Improvement Project No. 1984 -09
2. The City Administration is hereby authorized and directed to
review the established policies and procedures regarding special
assessments for local improvements and to submit its findings
and recommendations to the City Council.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
COTY
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION 14 1 0.
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATIONS OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR LYNDALE AVENUE HATER MAIN, STREET, A14D SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
(IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS NOS. 1984 - 08, 1984 -09 & 1984 -11)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, that the City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to prepare
plans and specifications for the construction of street and sidewalk improvements
on Lyndale Avenue between 53rd Avenue North and 57th Avenue North (Improvement
Projects No. 1984 -08, 1984 -09 and 1984 -1.1),
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota, that said plans and specifications shall be submitted to
the Minnesota Department of Transportation for approval and with the request
that "Municipal Turnback" funds be encumbered therefore.
Date Mayor
ATTEST: _
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY
63 0 1 ' S I 11 L E C1 F I il k K'V,'A'(
13110)KLY01 CENTER, MINUSOTP, 550,
TELEPHONE UGI 5440
EMERGENCY-('COLD TE- FIRE
ENGINEER'S REPORT
Lyndale Avenue Improvement Projects Nos. 1984.08, 1984-09, & 1984-11
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Water Main Improvement Project No. 1984-08
Street Improvement Project ho. 1984-09
Sidewalk improvement Project No. 1984-11
PROJECT LOCATION: Lyndale Avenue from 53rd Avenue North to 57th Avenue North
DISCUSSION: Effective April 1, 1984 the jurisdictional responsibility for owning,
improving, maintaining and patroling Lyndale fi,ver,ue North 'between 53rd and 57th Avenues
North has been "turned back" from the Minnesota Department of Transportation to the
City of Brooklyn Center. A resolution requesting designation of this street tc, the
City's Municipal State Aid Street system was adopted on April 9, 1984.
7, It is now proposed that the City provide for the installation of water main for the
reconstruction of this street to Municipal State Aid standards.
111"rMain Improvement Project No. 1984-08
This is one of very few areas within the City of Brooklyn Center which has not been
served by the City's water distribution system. All houses and buildings in this
area are served by individual private wells.
In conjunction with the construction of 1-94, the City contracted with the State
of Minnesota (NN/DOT) to extend water mains across under 1-94 to Lyndale Avenue at
53rd Avenue and at 57th Avenue. Fire hydrants installed at the ends of those two
extensions provide the only water supply for fire protection to the area.
It is proposed that a water main and additional fire hydrants now be installed
along Lyndale Avenue from 53rd Avenue to 57th Avenue North. And, it is our
recommendation that water service lines be extended to all developed lots and to
those undeveloped lots which are capable of being developed without need of variance
(variances from setback and area requirements would be necessary for some parcels
if they are to be allowed to be developed).
Street improyfropt_Project No. 190-09
Staff review of existing roadway conditions shows that the existing pavement has
been placed in a rural cross-section configuration with a surface width of 24 to 26
feet. However, adjacent development has resulted in nest ditches having been filled
or partially filled. As a result, storm water runoff ponds along the street's
1111idge and/or in driveways.
11:110M UPOPT - ProjeM M. 1926-09, 09, & 31
Page
, oil hyringn OK pavamont onalysis of M roadoy structure have shown that
1101" t will be ;ore economical to totally rvnovy and recon5truct the exiving roadway
than it would _ to upqryda M exibLinq ro&m. Thin decision is reinforced by
the consiUrvKH that at leost M of the exibying surface would have to be removed
and replaced to allcw MsLaMaKon of Me walpr main.
We recoyncndthat this street he constructed to a basic curb-to-curb width of 28
feet. This is the minimum State Aid standard for construction of a two-lane street
without pirking. State Aid regulations will also require the adoption of a resolution
prohibiting on-street parking at any Me.
We also recommend that, in those areas where adjoining property owners wish to have
on-street parking provided, the City agree to widen the street in those areas so
as to allow on-street parking provided the following conditions are met:
Condition No. 1 - Adequate street right-of-way exists, or the requesting
property owner provides required easements at no cost
to the City.
Condition No. 2 - The City Engineer determines that proper drainage patterns
can be maintained through such parking bays.
Condition No. 3 - The City Engineer determines that safe and proper slopes
can be maintained in the boulevard areas.
Condition No. 4 - The property owner agrees to pay additional special assessments
covering the additional cost of construction. (Note: Turnback
funds may not be used for this purpose.)
Condition No. 5 - The property owner understands and agrees that any such
on-street parking spaces are public parking spaces which are
subject to the same rules and regulations which apply to any
other on-street parking areas within the City.
Staff also recomTends that concrete curb and gutter installation and street resufac-
ing be completed on 55th Avenue and on 56th Avenue between Lyndale Avenue and the
cul-de-sacs which were constructed by KN/DOT as a part of the 1-94 construction
project.
In conjunction with these street improVements it is also proposed that concrete
aprons be constructed for all driveways along these streets (i.e. on Lyndale
Avenue, on 55th Avenue and on 56th Avenue.
Sidewalk Improvement Pro No. 1984-11
In conjunction with the proposed street construction, we also recommend installation
of a public sidewalk on the West side of Lyndale Avenue between 53rd and 57th
Avenues, thereby providing a pedestrian link between the two bridges (both bridges
have sidewalks) and to the River Ridge Park area.
Ii (( f Noq.
Page 3
11111,11AL l,K,, I DEP lolls:
A W rvin 1: Drov—Pr! Project No. 19
Staff has revie n d existing assessment policy as it relates to the levy of water
main assessments Or the proposed improvement. Literally interpreted, the policy
allows for levy of assyssrents against all properties on the basis of frontage,
excess area, and ser` ve installation costs since the project lies within an R2
Zoning District (1 or 2 family s truct..r Ens al Ic ed) . Became of the predominance
of single - family houses, staff dogs not consider this position to be wholly
appropria te. Therefore staff recommendi that the City Council levy one residential
ugit assessment ag.rins :t each property which is used as a single - family residential
site. Further, staff recommends that the City Council defer additional assessments
allowed for levy against any site which could support a 2 family structure if that
site is presently supporting a single family structure. Said deferrment would
remain in effect until such time as the property is fully developed.
In those cases where '_.rye property currently supports a 2 family structure (i.e.
the duplex at 5519/5523, the 4 -plcx, at 5547 and 5601, and the motel at 5608) we
recommend that the property be assessed frontage, excess area, and service costs
in accordance with the existing assessment policy.
Finally, staff recomnands that no water main assessment he levied against presently
t undevelopable land (i.e. variance required). Rattier, it is recommended that the
Council propose to levy hookup charges only if and when development occurs on these
properties.
B. St reet Improv Project No. 1984 -09
For Turnback projects, the Municipal State Aid system has established a special
"Turnback Account" specifically for the purpose of allowing the City to upgrade the
street to current st niards. Accordingly, turnback funds will be made available
for street construction, curb and gutter installation, driveway construction and
storm sewer modifications.
Staff also recommends that all abutting properties be specially assessed on the
basis of the City's established policy for improvement of State Aid streets.
Rates previously established for 1954 projects are S21.7S /lineal foot for street
surfacing and S12.20 /lineal foot for concrete curb and gutter. also, property
owners who do not now have paved driveways would be assessed for the cost of
co es ti ma ted cost of 535.00 per square yard.
concrete driGttra , _tr action at an cs i P
y co
Regarding the proposed street improvements on 55th and 56th Avenues, the City
Assessor has advised us that, in his opinion, it is not possible to demonstrate
a greater increase in market value for "corner lots' (where improvements are
installed along both frontages) that the increase in value which can be demon-
strated for "interior lots ". Accordingly, we recommend that no additional
assessments be levied for sideyard frontages.
WAIVIR 'C' `fa - Projuctn Non r 1914-0, L5
Pay- 4
op VarLher rovV, of pr enorty o4ner0ip ruve&5 thAt some parcels located easterly of
Lyndale Tannno arn uwnod by proparty Gwkcrg of the westerly parcel directly across
Lyndalc Avnn52, Jn nov2 caseb, tho Wo pronerties share thP Same legal description,
%Whilp in othnr cnnLs tho p&rcels hain Yralw, indivinal legal descriptions.
Staff th City Ejuncil levy bpeci assessments along both sides for
the prudDsud strqat ir;rovo�nnts. Wevnr, the Council may choose to provide for
abatewonL of we tLreat 0provu7m vsswinrwas for those parcels located easterly
of the streci which rail not be developed without issuance of a variance, special
use, etc,, It agreements can be reached with these property owners that these
properties will not be developed. (Kotn: it woild app2ar that the best way to
handle this circumstance would he to defer thy assessment until and unless the
property is developed. However, State staWes (M.S. 429) do not allow for the
defertmentc-f special assessments for street improvements.)
As referenced earlier in this report, we reco- , End that property owners be allowed
to petition for the construction of parking bays along Lyndale Avenue; however,
it is recommended that the costs related to the construction be assessed against
the property. The estimated cost per stall for parallel parking or for diagonal
parking is 5700.00.
C. Sidewalk Improvement Project No. 1984-11
It is anticipated that the sidewalk improvement project can be paid for by the use
of turnback funds. However, this is subject to final determination by the MN/DOT
State Aid Division when project plans and specifications are submitted for approval.
In the event of an adverse ruling regarding use of turnback funds, there is no
doubt that the City can elect to use our regular Municipal State Aid funds.
PROJECT COST AND FUNDING SUMMARY: Based upon the information provided, staff has
estimated the project costs and funding available for the proposed projects. A
summary of the costs and finances is as follows:
Estimated Project Costs:
A B C
Proj ect 190-08 Proiect 1984-09 Project 1984
Lyndale Ave Lyndale Ave 55th& 56th Ave Total Street Lyndale Ave
I tem Water Main Street impr Street Imur Imp Cost Sidewalk
-- --. , L-- r
Construction 53,110 210,590 19,820 230,41.0 33,670
Contingency 7,00 21,060 2, 24,030 5,050
Subtotal 61 231,650 22 ,190 254,440 38,720
Engineering 5,500 20,850 2,050 22,900 3,00
Administrative 610 2,320 230 2,550 390
Legal 610 2,320 --- 2,320
Capitalized int. --- --- --- --- -----
TOTAL
$ 67,800 $257,140 5 25,070 $282,210 $ 42,590
ENrj WL!, P i n noq 09
. P au l`
Estimated Total Cast, Project 19PI-02 - S WNW
Estimatod iota! Cost, project 1921- 09 - 20,210
Estimotod Total roject 192 11 -
Estimated Grand Total, All ProjecLs , S392,600 plus costs of driveways,
parking stalls and water
service lines
Estimated Pevenue Sources:
11, later Main Improycmpt Praject No. 1984-0S
Special Assessments
Single Family Residential (26 Units P S2400/Each) $62,400
Frontage (1286.49 L.F. @ S24.57/L.F.) 31,610
Area (4297 S.F. ? S7.62/100 S.F.) 330
Service line installations Actual cost
TOTAL $ 94,340
(plus line service
costs)
Less credits to P.U. fund for previous construction _i26
Net Project Cost $ 67,800
lilt- ,Ure;I_ImRrqV,qeqt - Project 1984-09
, Municipal State Aid Turnback Funds
Construction & Contingency $231,650
Engineering Costs 20,850
SUBTOTAL $252,500
Special Assessments
Street (047.37 L.F. @ S21.78/L.F.) $105,580*
Curb and Gutter (4847.37 L.F. @ $12.20/L.F.) 59,140*
Driveway Actual Cost
Parking Stalls Actual Cost
SUBTOTAL $164,720
TOTAL $417,220
Less transfer to M.S.A. Account 2611 13� 5,010)
NET PROJECT CHARGES $282,210
*Note: This estimate of special assessments includes the levy
of "double" assessments against properties with
frontages on both sides of Lyndale Avenue.
roi
Page 6
IN Sidewalk 1NqrnvQPQnt Projoct No. !W-11
Municipal State Aid Turnback Funds S 42,590
(Alternate nource Kyular M.S.A. funds)
D. Net Grand Total Project Revenue 5392,600
plus charges fro;�
driveways, parL
stalls and wan:
service lines
E. Sanitary Sewer Connection Charge
Departmental records indicate that four remnant parcels located at the southwest
corner of Lyndale and 57th Avenues may be conbined to form one developable parcel.
Neither remnant (nor its parent parcel) has been assessed a sanitary sewer connection
charge. It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge this condition and
consider levying a special assessment for said connection charge based upon the
1960 levy rate (402.23) with interest compounded at 6 percent per year, resulting
in a hookup charge of S1,628.60.
I NCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The improvements as described above are feasible under
the conditions outlined and at the costs estimated. It is recommended the City Council
establish a public hearing for the project on Way 21, 1984 and authorize staff to hold
a neighborhood meeting prior to the proposed improvement hearing date thereby affording
the affected property owners an opportunity to become familiar with the staff proposals.
Respectfully submitted,
1. Grube, P.E.
City Agincer
JNG:jn
e
_. i ! ' ,I .__ _ - 1, '•� •` ! ' 1 t } ��•.
...fir_ ___ .._...�., ,.�.e_ .r....� .0 _..., t `41.1 ...""",, i ��� . •
s , ,
PRMEY LOCATION
~--'. <1 i:; �,`�\ ct EC \L A SS E SSMENT 01S! tZtC
FOR
,`; I RM) 1N 1MtR PR0J.{ C
STREET
—V u
1
1
1. � 1
MembF�r introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
NO.
RESDIETION APPROVING AGREE MLNT WITH ERKKILA & ASSOCIATES FOR
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE S 2 ICIT P 'LA TING TO STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1924-09
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Centex,
Minnesota, that the proposal submitted by Lrkkila & Associates to provide
Landscape Architecture Services for the design of landscape improvements relating
to Lyndale Avenue Street Improvement Project No. 1984-09, at an estimated cost
of $ 1,350.00 is hereby accepted. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into contract with Erkkila & Associates for
said services.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
loll The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
, member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
C. ... _ A
CITY
—�, OF I F'301 SE {i �;t_ C: ;�_I: E'��`s_tl:Vv/'�Y
P
2
I- MIFNr. fiCY- POLiC'f- -FIRE
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, Ci ty `Iana er
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public lk,orks
DATE: May 17, 1984
RE: Contract for Landscape Architectiure Service for Streetscape
.Improvements Along Lyndale Avenue
In conjunction with the design of the Lyndale Avenue street improvements,
staff recommends the City secure the services of a landscape architecture
firm for the design of landscape improvements along the street boulevard.
In addition, it is recommended that the firm provide landscape design
recommendations for the treatment of the area around the C:it �-'s Lift
Station No. ? site, located. along Lyndale Avenue at SSth Avenue.
Accordingly, staff has negotiated with Erkkila F Associates, Inc. for
said landscape design recommendations. A copy of their proposal is
attached.
We recommend that said agreement be approved if the Council authorizes
staff to prepare plans and specifications for the Lynd.ale Avenue street
improvement. A resolution providing said approval is submitted for
consideration by the City Council.
Sy Knaj'3r
r .
SK :jn
i
r '
3
t
i
e^
t
Fray 16 19(Sx`
Hir,, Gerald Splinter, Administrator
City Adr,intrative C) f - F ices
6301 Shingle: Creek parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Re: Old Lyndale Avenue Improvements (53rd to 57th Ave. fro.)
Dear Hir. Splinter:
I have reviewed the existing conditions in the area of the
proposed street improver,ents alonq old Lyndale Avenue. As I
understand the potential project; landscape in provements along
the street and at the pump house are desired. I believe there
are Landscape architectural services we can provide relative to
this desire. This Letter is our proposal for landscape
architectural services on this project. Our services and our
corresponding charges are as follows:
1. Field check existing conditions and collect base maps from
the Pub L i c forks Department. [ a preliminary
determination on the advisability of planting in the right of
way. The total maximum cost for this service ... $90.
2. If a landscape plan for the right of way is desired after
completion of item 1, Erkkila Q Assoicates shall prepare a
planting plan for this area. The maximum cost for this
service ... $210.
3. Prepare a one sheet improvement plan for the pump station.
This may include timberwork, planting , and minor regrading
to achieve a "cleaner ", more manicured appearance. General
details and notes shall be put on the sheet to clarify the
intent. The maxirirum cost for this service small be...$1,050.
We shall initiate work only upon instructions to proceed and
shaLL complete work within a 7 day time period. We shall expect
the City to p � provide us base data m Y lar base maps, and any other
support necessary to augment our services which are landscape
0id Lynclaie Avenue Improvements
May 16, 1964 - page 2
�
design oriented (surveying, redrafting, engineering services,
finai pian printing, und bidding obaiL be by the Pubiic Works
Department). If this proposni is accepted, an authorizing
signature ohouLd be p[axed on the bottom of this proposai or a
brief Letter referencing his proposai shoii be an anceptabLe
notation of our agreement on services and fees. Since the time
period is so very short a phone caLL to us the morning after the
Cnuncii authorizes work is requested. Ue shaii wait to hear if
the Councii chooses to undertake this project.
Sin er Ly°
`~ '
Tim ErkkiLa ASLA
� ERKKILA ASSOCIATES
�
TWE/'i
'
`
�
�
�N��
/-�
Member Phil Cohen introduC(�d thc [oll0xing resolution and nmv2d its
ado ;tion:
�
� HOUSING C60 UU |![SIULUTlON NO, 84-1
KE3ULUTIO� RECOHM[NOIHG DI5pOSITIDN OF AN APPEAL OF A HOUSING
MAINTENANCE CONPLlANCE OKDER GIVEN CHIPPEWA PARK APARTMENTS
WHEREAS, On April 20, 1984 th( Inspector conducted a Housing
� U inspection at the Chippexa Par� A)ur�mentS, specifically 6417 Camden
�
Avenue North, Apartment N0. 112, at which L ime certain YiOldtf0nS of the Housing
� Maintenance and Occupancy Ordinance were discovered; and
WHEREAS, on April 24, 1984 the 8Vilding Inspector issued a. Compliance
Order listing 13 vio7ati0ns of the Housing Muin12narice and Occupancy Ordinance
�
found at 6417 Camden Avenue North and directed such Compliance Order t0 Mr.
Harold Li2f5ChultZ, owner of the Chippewa Park Apartments, which was received On
April 20, 1984; and
WHEREAS, On May l, 1984 pursuant to Section 12-120 of the City Ordi-
nances the Planning and Inspection Dep.-rtment of the Citv of 8r0Ok7yn Center
� .
received an dppe-8l filed by Paul C. 3teff2nson, an attorney representing Chippewa
� Park Properties and Hat LiefSChultz, owners Of the Chippewa Park Apartments in
Brooklyn Center; and
WHEREAS, Said appeal Set fort!) in writing four specific grounds on which
� the app20l vias being based; and
�
�
WHEREAS, Section 12-1203 of the C�tv Ordinances requires the City Council,
� Sitting as a Board 0f Appeals, to hear the aypeal xithin 30 days after said appeal
is filed, taking into consideration any advice and recommendation from - the Advisory
HOV3in� Commission; and
�
WHEREAS, the Board of Appeals may reverse, modify, or affirm, in whole
or in part, the Compliance Order based on an erroneous interpretation Of the
0rdinanc2` , and
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution N0, 77-22 establishes the Housing
Advisory Commission as the initial review and advisory body for the Board of Appeals
� re]ardinO contested Compliance Orders; and
�
WHEREAS, On May lG, 1984 the Housing Advisory Commission conducted 0
review of the contested Compliance Order and took comments from the City's
Director Of Planning and Inspection On behalf of the City and from a representative
of Hai LiefsChUltZ,owner0f the Chippewa Park Apartments; and
�
�
WHEREAS, the Housing Advisory Commission makes the following recommended
findings;
I. The appeal received by the Planning and Inspection Department
�
on May l" 1084 NO3 d properly submitted appeal.
� y. That the Housing Maintenance and Occupancy Ordinance does not
specifically require that each section of the ordinance must
be cited to mdk2 6 Ccmplianra Order valid Only that the Com-
pliance Order describe the nature and location of the violations.
�
RESOLUTION NO. 84-1
---------
3. That the appellant won later supplied the applicable section
numb2rs of the ordinance and Lhd1 tho modified Compliance Order
shall be the Compliance Order of record.
4. That the 72 hours given tho u`./ner of Chippewa Park Apartments
t0 correct four specific viulaLi0ns was reasonable in that
these life-safety concerns n2rc easily correctable within that
time . and that failure t0 correct them would cause an undue
penalty 1u the Kent Assistance recipient living at that complex.
5. The fact that the Fire Department had given the owner 30 days
t0 correct some of the SamC violations does not negate the
Building Inspector's 72 hour compliance notice in light of
N0. 4 above.
6. The fact that the Building inspector was at the Chippewa Park
Apartments on April 20, 1984 L0 conduct a Metro HRA Section 8
Rent Assistance Housing Quality Standards Inspection does not
negate the Building Inspector's responsibility to enforce the
City's Housing Maintenance and Occupancy Ordinance and issue
�
Compliance Orders for violations found at that time.
7. That the violations listed on the Compliance Ord8& issued on
April 24, 1984 are supported by d review of the provisions Of
the Housing Maintenance and Occupancy Ordinance.
WHEREAS, the representative of the Chippewa Park Apartments requested
the Housing Commission to modify Point Nos. 2 and 5 Of the above recommended
findings; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Commission reviewed, discussed and deliberated the
request and decided that the recommended findings as indicated above were in Order
and appropriate.
� MOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing Advisory Commission to
�
recommend t0 the City Council, sitting as a Board Of Appeals, that the appeal
submitted on behalf of the owners of the Chippewa Park Apartments be denied and
that the contested Compliance Order dated April 24, 1984" as modified With the
inclusion Of the applicable ordinance section numbers, be affirmed in its entirety.
7 70a Chairman
Secretary
The NO1i0n for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
'
Dolores Hastings, and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor
thereof; Chairman Phyllis Plummer, Commissioners Dolores Hastings, Ray Har0ld5on,
` Ron Turner, Phil Cohen, Dan Lawrence, and Barbara Sorenson and the following voted
against the same: none. Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed Ond
adopted.
MINUTES OF Tlll;; 01� Till'; HOUSING
CG: '4,'- Oil V& CITY CJPN TFR IN THE
OF MI SUPA
CIUNIZY OF ill"Ilil , NNE
MAY 15, 19U4
CITY IVdL
CALL TO ORDER
Thie Brooklyn Center Housing Com: rr< i in regular session and was
called to order by Chairperson Phyllis Pluvner at 7:30 p.m.
FELL CALL
Chairman Phyllis Pluirmer, Cojj,,Tjj
_j.ssj,oij I )n Lawrence, Ron Turner,
Dolores Hastings, Barb Sorenson, PhJ Cohen and Ray Haroldson. Also
present were Councilpember Rich Theis, Director of Planning and Inspection
Ron Warren and Administrative Assistant Brad Hoffman.
1]xcused from the meeting were Commission members Ken Felger and Cliff
Williams.
APPROVIL OF MINUTES - APRIL 10 1984
There was a motion by Commissioner Hastings and seconded by Commissioner
Turner to approve the minutes of the April 10, 1984 Housing CoITLmission
meeting as submitted. The motion passed unanimously.
HEARING - APPEAL FROM AN ADMINISTRATIVE. CO%jfiPj,IANCE ORDER
Chairperson Plummer opened the hearing on an Appeal from a Compliance
Order by noting for the Commission that it was the responsibility of the
Housing Commission to review and comn on appeals from Chapter 12 of
the City Ordinances. She noted for the Commissioners that it was their
prerogative to recommend to the City Council an affirmation of the compli-
ance order a modification or a denial of the same. She then recognized
Commissioner Cohen wio noted that the appeal before the Housing Commission
involved an HRA inspection for the Metropolitan HRA and he wanted to
disclose for the record that he was Chairman of the Metroplitan HRA and
that he had earlier requested that Administrative Assistant Hoffman check
with the City Attorney to obtain their opinion as to any potential con-
flicts. Administrative Assistant Hoffman noted that he had discussed the
matter with Dave Kennedy from the City Attorney's office and it was his
opinion that there was not a conflict of interest on the part of Commis
sioner Cohen sitting in on the hearing involving the appeal from the
compliance order.
Chairperson Plummer recognized Director of Planning and Inspection Ron
Warren. Director Warren revie%., for the Commission the appeal from a
compliance order as submitted by Harold Liefschultz, ow�ier of the Chippewa
Park Apartments, in Brooklyn Center. lie noted that the appeal was received
on May Ist and that it was an Appeal from the Compliance Order issued by
the City on April 24, 1984. tie noh�d that the compliance order was in
writing, described the location, tai nature of various orders of the
Housing Maintenance occupancy ordinance, established specific tin for
correcting the violations and notified the recipient- of an appeal course.
The violat were noted by the BLO Lding inspector while conducting a
Housing Q .ialjty Inspection for a 1 IlRA Section 8 rent assistance
participant on April 20th. He further stated that the appeal was filed
5-15-84 -1--
by Mt -. Pau C. St- f f enson, an at i c >> r y r of esenting Ch pp wa mark Prol.:�er-
ties.
He shalyd that lr. Steffenson's alTxot was pert of the Commission's
sion's
agenda ;:= ct ,ties k as-fd on four int_:,. Point 1, he alleged that the
Housing and Occup as _y or::l; n _,nc e required that notice be
givc 11 0! t-he specific sect_ Lois of t ho ordinance violated and that the
compliance orY1..r issued failed to We the ordinance sections with respect
to the 13 violations noted. Director Warren brought the Commissi_o
attention to Section 12 -1201 of the City's ordinance which states "describe
the location and nature of the violations of this ordinance." He noted
that nothing in Chapter 12 raydred a specific citation but rather_ a
description of the violation. it should be noted however, that as a
courtesy the City has supplied th e appe lant with the applicable ordinance
sections and as such it was rEcoi(-tmended to the Housing Commission that
the Compliance Order as modified be the compliance order for record.
Point 2, the appellant states that Section 12 -1201 requires a compliance
official to establish reasonable time for the correction of such violations.
He further states that Chippewa Park Apartments were given only 72 hours
to correct 4 specific violations. He further_ notes that the fire department
had given them 30 days to correct certain violations including the same
fire doors cited by t, Building Inspector_. Director Warren noted that
the ordinance requires that we establish a reasonable time for correction.
He noted that the Inspector was doing a Metro HRA Section 8 inspection
for the renwal. of rental assistance provided for the occupant of one of
the units located at 6417 Camden Avenue North. He further stated that
the renewal of assistance was for May 1, 1984.
The first four violations for which the 72 hours compliance period was
established are considered to be life safety concerns. The fact that the
violations existed meant that the unit failed the housing quality standards
and rent assistance for the occupant would not be extended until the
violations were corrected. The corrections for these violations were the
responsibility of the owner to correct and not the tenant. The purpose
of the 72 hour period was to get proper coa 1pliance within a short but
reasonable period of time so that the rental assistance could be continued.
It should be noted that all four of the items were relatively simple
items to correct within that period of time and that -in fact they were
corrected.
In point three, the appellant argued that the compliance order was a
result of an ERA inspection on apartment 112 at 6417 Camden Avenue North
and that the alleged violations had no relationship to a HRA inspection
of an individual unit. Director INarren noted that the point was totally
meritless. The EPA Section 8 Housing Quality standards include all common
areas as � %7ell as the individual unit. IIe noted that the Housing Quality
standards dove tail the City's Housing Maintenance and Occupancy ordinance
as well. He also noted that a Building Inspector_ cannot be expected to
ignore obvious violations of the Housing Maintenance ordinance while per -
forming any inspection on the property.
In point four, he alleges that several. of the violations do not violate
the Housing r ,�> t�t�or � ocm� i,owean�ap�u�lther were reflecting
H
' ' - ltient. complex should
be maintaino d. Ile slx- c:i-fically staters that there is no section of the
ordinance re.qui ring the maintenance of driv_inq and parking areas or the
5-15-8
removal of i debris, jr) j_ and driving areas. Direct-or.
Warren rlot,ed ti (",I I'll orce"I ; t: of- 11�)using Maint-c., and (Xcupancy
ordinance iS not- a ot. J) 1, 's cian perception of how an
apartri cr shaulcl il�.)u,,incj Comudsslon's attention was
then Or,�,an to S(,tj 1.2-- rorjr,�;Aiq the I
_()n and driving of
parking areas. This sect st-ates, "j-hE owner of a multi_ family dwelling
or IL res and maintaining in good
condition pave 7111-rit- Lnd delin pa . kind areas and driveways for tenants
consistent with (_ 35 of th( Ci't-y's ordinances." Section 35-710 of
the ' 'ity's zoning ordinance relat-in(_j to the surfacing, drainage and curbing
states "in all districts, other thaln Rl and R2, all. off street driving
and parking areas shall be improved with a minimum of two inches hot mix
paver laid bituminous mat, or a comparable concrete slab, placed over a
well compacted sub grade and gravel. base. The base shall conform to
Minnesota High�qay Departm, it's specifications for Class 5 gravel." Direc-
tor Warren then made reference to Section 12-302 regarding the maintenance
of shared or public areas which states "every owner of a dwelling containing
two or more dwell`nq units shall- maintain in clean and sanitary conditions
the shared or public areas of the dv_� 11ing and premise thereon. Director
Warren noted that this section establishes the owners responsibility for
maintaining common areas free of do')ris thus the Building Inspector's
request for compliance.
In summary Director Warren stated that he felt the compliance orders were
appropriate in all respects and not based on erroneous interpretations of
the ordinance and that the appellant had not shown a basis for his
appeal. He therefore recormiyended that the Housing Commission take action
to reco, that the compliance order issued to the Chippewa, Parks Apart-
ments on April 21ith be affirim-d in its entirety. For that purpose the
Commission's attention was drawn to a proposed resolution drafted by the
staff outlining the compliance order issued.
Commissioner Cohen inquired of Director Warren if any of the items had
been corrected. Director Warren informed the Commission that they are
being corrected and that he has been informed that the appellant will
comply. Commissioner Lawrence inquired if the City performed continuous
inspections. Director Warren noted that this inspection was a renewal of
a Metro I-IRA Sect 8 contract with the owner and that the City has a
contract with Metro HRA to do such inspections. He noted that each year
a follow tip inspect-ion is required to insure that the apartments comply
with the requirements of the program. He also noted that inspections are
made based upon complaints and that further inspections are made every
two years relative to the renewal of their license. Chairperson Plummer
inquired if the compliannce orders issued were the same life safety
kinds of issues. Director Warren indicated that it was not his impli-
cation that they were always for life safety inspections but in other
buildings within the Chippewa Park complex similar violations have
been noted and included life safety violations. He also stated that
tags have been issued for such life safety violations for the other
buildings. lie also stated that this was not the f irst time the owner
had been cited for such violations. Commissioner Haroldson inquired
as to any potential problems within apartment #112 that was inspected.
Director Warren noted that the apart did pass the inspection. He
also stated it the comiik)n areas that failed. ComiAssioner Hastings
expressed her co with the fii-e cl'oor issue and her greater concern
for the safety of the volunteer firemen that would have to fight any
potential fire in that hu M.rect-or Warren then requested that.
the flousini( - r a second apjx from the j Com�,nissjon again mr, to hears
s,awe part on Mciv . at 7.30 piri.
5-15-84
Chai rr:)or ""("n 1 1 u m! fhz I I (�C()�;! I i "Al attorney for
C11 pp"VIC', Pcl r apa r f noted Lhat lie walS not in
a hurry to treat: it could wait, until a
later ctite bU.t 1)of that_ it irc - )e in comp] iain(
to
With tl C-1 t - Y , s or'] i.nance stal, that all of
the it etas had rYzcn corrected w,,
p tion of the parking lot-.
U %17J he felt th
Mr. Stefferlsori hrlt_Tly ir)(U'.ca that
�I -ated that he felt-
were certa � 0 to ;Ii? le
that funjai-, ntal tit; rness a -c itat c - -ion of a section
of the oz diriance t_�einrj vJulal_ed. He that in Section 12-709 the
word facility is not defined. tI, fur viler iridicate�d that no where in
the ordinance -is the word fac.-i'lity < f inf d and felt that the staff
gave to broad of an inter preta_i on to that wording. He also noted
a conf ict or lack of coordina I '-ion hetween t-he fire department's irlsp
tion which required a 30 day and the Planning and Jnsj
department's 72 hours. He noted the purr-x of his appeal was one
for f airness. Chairperson Pluritmter ther, __*H how he proposed to
modify the proposed compliance order. Mr. Steffenson indicated he
would have item #2 state that the ordinance does require specific cita
tion of the violations and that item #5 be changed to reflect the
same date as the fire departments. Chairperson Plummer inquired as
to the length of tirre that Mr. Lj_efschultz has owned the apartments
to which Mr. St-effenson replied since approxim�_ 1975. Director
Warren indicated that Mr. Liefschultz has always been one of the princi-
ples in that building. Commissioner Haroldson briefly read from Section
12-1001 and indicated to Mr. Steffenson that he felt the 72 hours was
justified base( upon a reading of that section of the ordinance. He
then inquired of Mr. Steffenson if the owner was aware of any of these
problems prior to the compliance order. Mr. Steffenson stated that
prior to the inspection R & 0 Elevator had been called to repair the
elevator but had not arrived at that point in time. He indicated that
the owner does have a maintenance coritract withi R & 0 Elevator to
keep the elevators in operational condition. Folloo, Mr. SLe
presentation Chairperson Plummer requested Director Warren to comment
on Mr. Steffenson's request. Director Warren indicated lie felt the
appellant was making an erroneous interpretation of the ordinance.
He further indicated that he doesn't dispute the need to coordinate
with the fire department but he noted that the fire depart is a
volunteer. department. The two departments meet on a monthly basis
and that they had had received the fire department's compliance orders
until after their citation had been issued. Commissioner Haroldson
inquired of Director Warren if other apartment owners have been given
similar time frames for similar. violations. Director Warren indicated
that they had. Commissioner Turner inquired if the appellant had failed
to make the corrections within 72 hours, would the unit have failed
the Section 8 standards. Director Warren indicated that they would
have in fact been failed, but they would have been failed on April
20th not May 1st.
RECESS
The Brooklyn Center Housing Commission recessed at 8:56 and reconvened
at 9:05 p.m.
Chairperson Plummer stated that she felt. the ordinance does not require
specific citations but indicated that perhaps in the future the Commis-
sion should dive consideration t, i_ev:Lewin,, the ordinance and require
such explicit citations in the future. Commissioner I-awrence concurred
5-84 --4--
TIU I �_� S I T
"i-i Lh Cc, P u'mm�� �ilso conct.irred.
r i rld_: cc� felj_ t1rA ii the fut-ure , out
0ASS,10r11J, -1 -
�Ibe r s �"711 "
en lssu.i..nq
O{ cou r, tr;y, 7 ac_- _;hould C: 't i ol
t]nat understo(.Yd
C ha A.1 F ;0
a f(;r cc)%sisft: my hul_ fhc fire d(q_ order doe,
not ne�;, f_e thoc of the 1 S commissioner Cohen
fl 1- I'l-Ir , -rder the landlord
fol the Ly-nefit of
and in fact- to botln , )cirt i;. CX11U11SST011i�_1r Hastings (agreed
and that Sc- io:i 8 item, required the 72 hour cornilpletion in
ora(r tCiC th cfvirier to assistance for which he had
ContracLed Writ h 1 _�;,-)n Pluim indi.cated that she
felt tha the iteiris cited i t1ge compl fiance order were covered under
Chapter 12. Thei-e aas, a uK)t-ion 'i Co Cohen and seconded
by Comum.issioner HaIsLings to ad th pro resolution but amending
L
the resolution to include a statem nt reflecting that the Commission
had received an aiD-eal from items, I and 5 of tl resolution and that,
the Comt did hear the, a.-c'peal and that they discussed the same
and second that the appeal was denied and the resolution upheld. The
motion passed unaniTI
Director Warren briefly discussed the May 29th meeting with the Commis-
sion. Follcr, a brief discussion it was agreed that the Commission
would again meet on May 29th for the second appeal. Chairperson Plummer
indicated that she felt the Commission should discuss the ordinance
arid perhaps requiring the specific citation number when issuing the
compliance order. Commissioner Cohen recommended that it be brought
back as a future discussion -item on the most expeditious way to handle
that. Commissioner Haroldson indicated that he wanted to commend the
Chippewa Park, for complying with the compliance order. Commissioner
Cohen indicated that he would like a staff report on the 29th on the
degree to which Chippewa. Park actually did comply with the compliance
order.
ENFORi CE1 OF THE HOUSING MAlYfENTANCE ORDINANCE
Administrative Assistant Brad Hoffman introduced the next agenda item
by referring to the letter. from Mary Neilson from the City Attorne 1 Q
office relative to a Minnesota Statute that would allow the City to
enforce it's Housing Maintenance Ordinance by depriving the rental
owner from any of the tax advantages of the property. Commissioner
Cohen gave a brief history of that- law noting that he had been active
in seeking its passage in the State Legislature and that it had origi-
nally been sought by the City of Minneapolis. There was a brief discus-
sion of potential use of the ordinance and general support for the
same. It was recommended that the item be brought back to the Housing
Commission in the fall for further consideration and potential action.
OTHER BUSINESS
Chairperson Plummer took this opportunity to announce her resigning
from the Housing Cor, as of July 31, 1984. She indicated to
the Commission that she has enjoyed her stay with the Commission but
at this point in tinx- was no longer able to serve on the Commission.
She also reminded the Commission that they would be meeting on May 29th.
5-15-84 --5-
A JOURNM ENT
There was a motion by Commissioner Turner and seconded by Commissioner
Lawrence to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The
meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
Chairperson
5 -15 -84 -6-
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: James Lindsay, Chief of Police
DATE: May 17, 1.984
SUBJECT: Beer License for Pizza Factory
Attached please find a copy of the resume done by Investigator
Dirks on the new owners of the Pizza Factory in application
for a nonintoxicating liquor license. we can find nothing
in either person's background which would preclude issuance
of this license.
�
T1 ro!311 mo (,[ t} �IJLioD o Dn;n Cllo[lcs �1
ii, x(I @ic!|eal |}uaO STKU"llZ, '{nin� E K^ S linturpri5os, operQLjVU
L�u |'izr� i/ocLoI y, jD :N)llcJLjuD i�ur u �oU-iALOXiCatin� Liqun[ li[cuse
s isSuud by tho City ol Brooklyu C�n|or. Dcnunpin C000 ty MiuooSota. This
o il
u\o�Li%aLiou �ns �oox conduCtod 1) Lj�oCor DO�T� D]8�3 ou0 LhiS
rc�omo is djctuted on 5 /| h/O4 aL )3iO honcs, Ibis ro�umc haS been troDs-
crihcd and LyyanriLton by �bjr]cy �N�}|l'OU'[, C]crk-Typist �or �l}o Brooklyu
[ouLur 9o]icc Dopartmunt. T�is rucumn i8 in {CaardS t0 C8s� N0, 84-06850.
APPLIC8*L'TT�
E
K. 5 EoLorprisos, operating as nizza Factory
081.6 Uom)oldL Ave. 0o.
Broo!lyo Ccotor, Mn. 55430
Phono: 566-4455
Donn Charles EDICKDO0
6 7O1 0up011 L Avo. 0o.
Brooklyn Center, �Mo, 55430
Phone: 561-0237
Michael Dean S78EIT%
3006 &roukviovv Drive
Brooklyn Center, Mn,
Phone: 560-2509
INFORMATION CONTAINED INII?DT0 THT3 FILE:
W - Part, l - General Information in support of an application for Non-Intoxi-
cating Liquor License.
Application Part II - Personal Information in the name of Donn Charles
EKlCKGO0,
Application Part Il - Personal Information in the name Of Michael Dean
OT0EI?%,
_________________________________________________________________________
'
Investigator Robert DIRKS has researched the background of Donn Charles
8KlCKS00 and Michael Dono S?REII% in an application for 8 Non-Intoxicating
Liquor License by contacting the local police and Sheriff's agencies, in
the areas of their present and former residences, as well as contacting the
Comput0r file systems for the National Crime Information Center and the
State of NiooeSnt8 Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. &nroonoc, Investigator
DIRKS has confirmed the, cmpIoTmcuL records of the most recent employers
and has reviewed the finonciog arrangements for the purchase of the said
business, Furthermore, Investigator U|8K8 has cootactCd the rc[orOoco5
lioLcd in a Part l - General Information application and discussed the
two �Ipplicants with those references and received information as to the
kind of people the applicants are.
bo PrcriooS owners of the Pizzo FurLorY, Mr. and Nrs. Poo] AI3D were to
nWare had 11lo business foreclosed on by L� m
c �opanT holding the loan, that
being 8CB �ntorprisms of 1-5150 Martinson Island Road in Prior Lake, Nu^
r~'
Resume by invesLigaLov Robert DIRK4 Case File 84-06890 Page 2
This resume is now being transciihad and typewriLten by Lori NOV AK, clerk-
oil pist for the Brooklyn Center Pwicc OrparmenL.
This business owned by Bradley ROTHNFY, ihe original owner of the Pizza
Factory. After foruclosurc Lhor, UP hu sin uSS then is being sold to the
applicants, including the name, flxLuics, cquipmant and supplies and pro-
ducts on hand, roquring a total invcSLM0nL of $55,000 by the applicants.
The purchase is being concluded by Lhrco (3) notes. The first being a
personal note to Mr. Donn ERICKSON by Andrew John RATHMANNER of 4219
Winchester Lane, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55429, in the amount of $20,000.
This note is secured by Mr. ERICKSON using collateral stocks for three
separate companies - 100 shares of IBM, 200 shares of Traveler's insurance
and 100 shares of Weyerhaeuser Company, current value listed at $20,500.
This is the only security on the note and the holder, Mr. RATHMANNER, has
no rights to the business in case of default.
The second, or first promisory note in reference to the transaction, is
hold by SGB Enterprises, operated by BraJley C. ROTHNEM, who is the
original owner of the Pizza Factory. This note is in the amount of
$25,000 and requires monthly installments of $485.00, and places SGB
Enterprises and Mr. ROTHNEM as the first secured party in case of default
by the applicants.
The second promisory note is from Paul Thomas AISH of 548 196th Drive,
Elk River, Minnesota, 55330. This note is in the amount of $13,500 and
i cording to the applicant, Mr. ERICKSON, is the amount of investment
cd to Mr. AISH in the foreclosure by SGB and therefore, is paid directly
him in monthly installments of $174.69 per month. This second pro-
misory note makes Mr. AISH the second securing party in case of default.
In discussing the financial arrangements with Mr. ERICKSON, Investigator
DIRKS was advised that the first securing party, SGB, would have primary
interest in default and that he understood our concern in reference to
a license being transferable should there be default to Mr. AISH, since
he had been declined in a previous application himself a nonintoxicating
liquor license. Mr. ERICKSON was advised by Investigator DIRKS that based
on the security agreements he had in the financing of the business, it
would be recommended that a stipulation be placed on the license in case
of default that the license would be nontransferable to either of the
securing parties, that being SGB, operated by Mr. ROTHNEM, or Paul T. AISH.
In explaining this to Mr. ERICKSON, he was in complete compliance and
indicated that he could understand the nontransferable license in case
of default based on the previous license being declined to Mr. AISH.
In talking with Mr. ERICKSON about the financial arrangements, Investiga-
tor DIRKS did inquiry also as to his cash outlay, at which time he explained
that.the promisory note that is a personal loan to him being secured by
his own personal stocks is his down payment, that being $20,000, plus
giving him some cash for operating expenses to start out, believed to be
approximately 53,500. Mr. ERICKSON also stated that the original cash
investment by Mr. STREITZ would be $1,000 from his own personal savings
1111 count.
In continuing the investigation, Investigator DIRKS had opportunity to
check on Mr. STRYATZ's application, at which time it was immediately noted
ReSHWU by lnvosLigaLoi Rohort DIRKA Case File 84-06890 Page
4110 L Mr. STRFITZ had been involved i t Pth he application for a gambling license
reference to Bobo a Lluln Wane in the City of Brooklyn Center. At
time, applicahion w t as revipwod, and i appeared that there had been
nothing found to limit him from having a 2nmbling license, and therefore,
should be no problums in reference lo his chnrncter in regards to the non-
intoxicating liquor license in the City of Brooklyn Center. The record was
updated in regards to checks an criminn! histories through the National
Crime Information Center, the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's
computer, as well as the Brooklyn Center files since he is a resident, and
Hennepin County files. Since the last application in reference to the
gambling license, there have been no offenses listed with any of those
law enforcement agencies and this investigator can find no reason that Mr.
STREJTZ should not be entitled to a noninLoxicating liquor license.
The applicant, Mr. ERICKSON, had not had a previous background investigation
done, so a complete investigation was done in reference to him and checks
made at the National Crime information Center, the Minnesota Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension, the Brooklyn Center records, since he has been a
resident for the last sixteen years, as well as Hennepin County records
In checking all of these places, Investigator DIRKS can find no criminal
history or any contacts with Mr. ERICKSON which would indicate a problem
in reference to the issuing of a nonintoxicating liquor license to him.
Investigator DIRKS also checked his spouse, Virginia Mario, and found
nothing in all of those locations either to indicate any problem in reference
to criminal activity with her either. investigator DIRKS did then check
th the employer of Mr. ERICKSON and spoke with a John OAKERSTROM of the
eraton Inn Northwest at 566-8855, where he is the head innkeeper, and
as advised that Mr. ERICKSON is their comptroller and is thought of
extremely highly in regards to his ability, honesty and dependability.
Investigator DIRKS was advised that Mr. ERICKSON was extremely moral
individual and of the highest standards and a very big asset to the Sheraton
Company. Investigator DIRKS attempted to contact the neighbors of Mr.
ERICKSON as well, and on two occasions found no one to be home on either
side of his residence. A check was made, however, with the references
listed in the Part I - General Information sheet, those being George H.
ANDERSON of 5932 Colfax Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, Douglas M. ROSSI,
of 6801 Dupont Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, also superintendent of
schools in Brooklyn Center, and Larry D. FRANKLIN of 6219 Kyle Avenue
NOUN, Brooklyn Center. In checking with these individuals, Investigator
DIRKS was advised that both of the applicants were of very high moral
character and extremely worthy of license of this nature in that they felt
they would run a strictly run operation in compliance to any ordinances
or state laws governing their establishment. The references indicated
when questioned about problems with juveniles or minors drinking or hanging
around the establishment if they thought this was a possibility with Mr.
STREITZ and Mr. ERICKSON in running their operation, all three indicated
that it was not a possibility in their minds. The references indicated
that both Mr. STRFITZ and ERICKSON had been involved in the youth activities
of Brooklyn Center kids for a great period of time, in way of baseball,
Babe Ruth, and otbar youth sports activities, and that they felt that they
uld not at all all any of that type of activity to happen in their
16 tablishment.
Investigator DIRKS, in completing the backgrounds on the Applicants, can
find no reason why they should not b issued a nonintoxicating liquor
Resume by Investigator Ruburt DIRKS CA se File 84-06890 Page 4
censer'.. MOSLiEltor DIRKS do m feel that 0
n spub n atiou o the license
ould possibly be placed in rUcTence LO any default on the promisory
11 1ILus held so that Lhe license he run Lrdusferable to any of the securing
parties. It should be noted that- Tis rmLriction has previously been
discussed with Chief LIINDSAY of the Brooklyn Center Police Department,
and it was upon his suggestion that it be placed on this license.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: James Lindsay, Chief of Police
DATE: May 13, 1984
SUBJECT: Gambling License Application for Rosary Altar
Society of St. Alphonsus Catholic Church
Attached please find the completed police investigation
of St. Alphonsus Rosary Altar Society in application for
a Class A Gambling License. Jerine Vivian POLACK is
listed as the Gambling Manager. Investigator Monteen's
resume lists nothing which would preclude the Rosary
Altar Society nor the gambling manager from receiving
such a license.
In addition to a Class A Gambling License, the Rosary
Altar Society has made application for a waiver of the
$10,000.00 fidelity bond, as provided by city ordinance.
The City Council must act on the following two matters:
1. The application for a Class A Gambling License. This
requires a majority vote of the Citv Council to pass.
Z. A waiver of the $10,000-00 fidelity bond. This requires
the unanimous vote of the City Council to pass.
The following is a resume of the invr t igat ion of St. Alphonsus Catholic
Church, Rosary Altar Society, in app1-ication for a Class A Gambling
0 i. c e n s e . TYii�; resume is in referenc,( i:.o I.Aie Brooklyn Center Police
epart, Case Number 84-06622. Thi resume has been prepared by A. Paul-
�"ONTEE,N and is transcribed and typewritten by Leanne OLDFATHER, Dispatcher
for the Brooklyn Center Police Department.
APPLICANT:
St.-Alphonsus Catholic Church,
Rosary Altar Society
7125 Halifax Ave. No.
Brooklyn Center, MN. 55429
Phone 561-5100
Jerine Vivian POLACK
4107 61st Ave. No.
Brooklyn Center, MN. 55429
Phone 533-0824
INVESTIGATION MATERIALS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS REPORT:
Application for a Gamb ng License
Application for a Gambling License, Part II in the name of Jerine Vivian
POLACK
Application for a Gambling License, Part III, Organizational Information
Letter requesting the waiver of the $10,000.00 fidelity bond
0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The Rosary Altar Society of St. Alphonsus Catholic Church began shortly
after the congregation was formed in 1959. The Rosary Altar Society is
made up of approximately 374 active members, all women of the parish
known as St. Alphonsus Catholic Church. operating under the auspices of
St. Al-phonsus Catholic Church, the organization has been granted a tax
exempt status and holds an Internal Revenue tax exempt number of 41-0846441,
and the State of Minn., Dept. of Commerce and Taxation tax exempt number
of 9019199.
Because of their status as a tax exempt auxiliary of a bonafide religious
organization, the Rosary Altar Society is exempt from filing the form 990
or 990T, as required by the Internal Revenue Service. Furthermore, the
State of Minn. Dept. of Commerce, Charities Division, grants an exempt
status to all bonafide religious organizations and their affiliates.
Therefore, they are exempt from filing the Charitable organizations Annual
Report form as required by Section 309.53 of the Minn. State Statutes.
The Rosary Altar Society holds organizational meetings and their fundraising
activities at St. Alphonsus Catholic Church, which is located at 7125
Halifax Ave. No., within the city of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County,
Minnesota. A legal description of the property is contained within the
application for a gambling license in 1.979 as well as in the application
for the St. Alphonsus Fun Fair. The Rosary Altar Society also uses the
*ailing address of its president for daily correspondence.
Contained within the application for a Class A Gambling license is a
Part 11, personal information form in the name of Jerine Vivian POLACK.
Resume by Investigator A. Paul . MON'1'1 Case ff84-06622 Page, 2
le er_ ine Vivian POLACK is a resident of the city of Brooklyn Center,
residing at 410*1 61st Ave. No. for the past 10 years. Mrs. POLACK is a
housewife and is not currently employed outside of the home.
Investigator MONTEE1' has found nothing of criminal nature listed in the
name of Jerine Vivian POLACK in the records of the City of Brooklyn
Center nor the Hennepin Counth Sheriffs Office, and likewise no
.indication of criminal record has been found in NCIC or MINCIS. Mrs.
POLACK holds a valid Class C drivers license with no violations.
Contained within the application for a Class A Gambling License, the
Rosary Altar Society of St. Al - ohonsus Catholic Church has requested a
waiver of the $10,000.00 fidelity bond, as provided for in the city
ordinance. It should be noted that the Rosary Altar Society has made
application for and received a gambling license since 1979. In 1983,
Jerine V. POLACK was the gambling manager for the Rosary Altar Society.
Pursuant to the ordinances and statutes, the Rosary Altar Society has
reported the required information to the Brooklyn Center Police Dept..
Investigator MONTEEN finds nothing which would preclude the issuance
of a Class A Gambling License to the Rosary Altar Society nor their
gambling manager. The City Council must act on the following two matters:
1. The application for a Class A Gambling license, which requires the
majority vote of the City Council to pass. 2. The waiver of the $10,000.00
0 idelity bond. This requires the unanimous vote of the City Council to
ass.
ME'MCRANDU N
TG: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: James Lindsay, Chief of Police
DATE: May 14, 1984
SUBJECT: Class I3 Gambling License for St. Alphonsus
Catholic Church Men's Club
Attached please find the completed police investigation for
St. Alphonsus Catholic Church mien's Club in application for a
Class B Gambling License. Robert James Watson is listed as
the executive officer and gambling manager in this application.
The resume filed by Investigator Monteen indicates nothing of
a questionable nature which would preclude either St. Alphonsus
Catholic: Church "Men's Club or Robert James V•'atson from receiv-
ing such a license.
In addition to the application for a Class B Gambling License,
the St. Alphonsus Catholic Church ;Men's Club has made applica-
tion for a waiver of the $10,000 fidelity bond as allowed under
the ordinance of the City of Brooklyn Center. The City Council
must act on the following matters:
1. Application for a Gambling License - Class B.
This requires the majority vote of the City
Council_ to pass.
2. The waiver of the $10,000 fidelity bond.
This requires the unanimous vote of the City
Council to pass.
The foIIowilig is a resume of the i live Stigiat.i.011 of Brooklyn Center Police
Depar Is Case Fi - 84-- 06709, the appl icati_oil of the St. Alphonsus
Catlaolir.., Clilarch tilcn's CLula for a Cl�lss f; G�lmbl_ng License; as issued by
40 City of hro()klvn C( 11(11111 11 County, hlilulcsota. Named � the
) lic�lt.ior) is Robc.r James WATSON, execuLive officer and gambling manager.
This investigatioil has been conduc,t.ed by A. I'atll_ �IONTEEN and this resume
transcribed and i.ypewritten by Lori. NOV'AK, clerk- typist for the Brooklyn
Center Police Department.
APP LICANT :
St. Alphonsus Catholic Church Men's Club
7025 lialifax Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, TIN 55zt29
phone - 561 -51.00
Robert James WATSON
7808 Newton Avenue NOrt.h
Brooklyn Park, NIN 55444
phone - 561 -21.86
INVESTIGATION MA CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FILE ARE
All application for a Gambling License.
An application for a Gambling License, Part II, in the name of Robert James
WATSON.
An application for a Gambling License, Part III, Organizational Information.
A letter addressed to the City Council requesting a waiver of the $10,000
dol.lty bond as allowed by the City Ordinance. - - -- - - --
_ _ ---------------------
The St. Alphonsus Catholic Church :den's Club is an organization of all male
parishoners of St. Alphonsus Catholic Parish who have attained the age of
eighteen years. The den's Club operates under the auspices of a president,
a vice - president, and a secretary- treasurer. It collects no dues, nor
the congregation
_ � -m membership. It does serve
me b
requires attendance of any of its p
by soliciting volunteers for various projects, as well as fund raising which
is distributed to the Boy Scouts, CDC School and other worthwhile causes.
In accordance with the guidelines of the United States Department of the
Treasury, the St. Alphonsus den's Club is considered a bonafide religious
or and i therefore t from filing the 990 or 990T form.
S, , exe
Likewise, the State Department of Commerce recognizes that a bonafide
religious organization of the nature is not required to file the annual
charity report as required by Section 309.53, Minnesota State Statutes.
The St. Alphonsus Men's Club was formerly known as the St. Alphonsus Holy
Name me Society. The Society as organized in 1.961 and the name change for -
Y
malized in 1.973.
According to the application for a Gambling License and its corresponding
Part. II poi-sonal information form, Robert James WATSON is listed as the
gambling manager. WATSON has been a resident of the City of Brooklyn Part:
since January of 1973. . Prior to that time, WATSON resided in Grand Forks,
)rth Dakota while attending North Dakota State University. WATSON is a
ry ..
Resume of Investigator A. Paul MONTI?T ?N, C,k 84 -06709 Page 2
0 tifiF,d p} bl.ic accountant empl, oyed by Coopers and Lybrand, Certified
li-c Accou,�tants, with off .i.c'os lccat c at 1000 Twin City ederal Towe
,
Minneapolis, Minnesota. WATSON has been so employed since January of 1972.
In cheering the files of the Brooklyn Canter and the Brooklyn Park Police
Denartm <_ nts - S
as we ,
_ 1.1 as the. Hennepin , r
n CoL.i�ty Sheriff's s Office , IvCIC and MIN-
CI Investigator I� ONTI�'IEN finds no record of criminal_ activity in the name
of Robert James WATSON. WATSON hol-ds a valid class "C" drivers license as
.issued by the State of Minnesota.
St. Alphonsus Men's Club has made app l_icati.on for and r_eceive.d a gambling
, is sued license as ..,sued by the City o
Brooklyn Center since 1979. During these
years Robert James WATSON has -
oeet. the gambling manager for the men's club.
During this time the men's club has complied properly with the monthly re-
p oz of income and disbursements as required by state statute and city
ordinance.
Included in the application is a letter addressed to the City Council re-
questing the waiver of a ten thousand dollar fidelity bond as allowed by
city ordinance. It should be noted that Robert James WATSON is currently
bonded in his position as a certified public accountant for the firm of
Coopers and Lybrand in excess of this ten thousand dollars.
Investigator IMONTEEN finds nothing which would preclude St. Alphonsus Men's
. Club nor Robert James WATSON from obtaining the class "B" gambling license
pplied for. The City Council must act on the following two matters:
1. Application for a Class B Gambling License
which requires a majority vote of the City Council to pass and
2. The waiver of the $10,000.00 fidelity bond
which requires the unanimous vote of the City Council to pass.
End of Resume
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: James Lindsay, Chief of Police
DATE: May 13, 1984
SUBJECT: Gambling License Application, St. Alphonsus
Catholic Church Fun Fair
Attached please find the completed police investigation
Of St. Alphonsus Fun Fair in application for a Class B
Gambling License. James S. Kowski is listed as the
Gambling Manager. Investigator MONTEENS resume lists
nothing which would preclude St. Alphonsus Catholic
Church nor the gambling manager from receiving such a
license.
In addition to a Class B Gambling License, St. Alphonsus
Catholic Church has made application for a waiver of the
$ fidelity bond as provided in the city ordinance.
The City Council must act on the following two matters:
1. The application for a Class B Gambling License. This
requires a majority vote of the City Council to pass.
2. A waiver of the $10,000.00 fidelity bond. This requires
the unanimous vote of the City Council to pass.
The f011OWing is a resume of the inves t j_gat ion of Brooklyn Center Police
Departim Case i'84-06621, - 1 t - us C
A -appl-ic, _j_oj-j of St. Alphons Ca I
Is hunch for a Clas:; B Gambling Licen.qc a; jE;skjecj by the City of Brooklyn
enter, Hennepin County, Minn osoLa. Ttir _j.rivost i gat ion has been conducted
by Investigator A. Paul MONTIaE'N. This resume is transcribed and type-
written Icy b0ar)"c' OLDFA IT Dispatcher for the Brooklyn Center Police,
Department.
APPLICANT:
13 f__
t�Tpi',�.sus Catholic Church
7025 Halifax Ave. No.
Brooklyn Center, MN. 55429
Phone 561-5100
Jarrie's Sylvester KOWSKI
3306 65th Ave. No.
Brooklyn Center, MN. 55429
Phone 566-9086
INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FILE:
Application for a Class B Gambling License
Application for a Class B Gambling License, Part II, in the name of
James S. KOWSKI
Application for a Gambling License, Part III, Organizational Information
Letter requesting the waiver of the $10,000.00 fidelity bond
0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
St. Alphonsus Catholic Church is a corporation located within the city of
Brooklyn Center. By legal description in Hennepin County, District 22,
Plat 89637, Parcel 6250:P1at 89101, Parcel 1410:P1at 89258, Parcel 6900:
Plat 89251, Parcel 7200.
St. Alphonsus Catholic Church owns and operates the sanctuary, rectory,
CDC School and other functions from a business office located at 7025
Halifax Ave. No., Brooklyn Center. St. Alphonsus congregation began in
January of 1959 and operates with a current membership of approximately
15,000. Of this, the active membership is approximately 4,000. St.
Alphonsus Catholic Church is a non-profit organization and has a tax
exempt status granted by the United States Department of the Treasury,
Internal Revenue Service, and carries the number 41-0846441. The Dept.
of Commerce and Department of Taxation of the State of Minn. have issued
tax exempt number 9019199 to St. Alphonsus Catholic Church. According
to the United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service
and the State of Minn. Dept. of Commerce, a bonafide religious organization
is exempt from filing Form 990 or 990T and is not required to.file any type
of a tax return with the State or Federal- government. Moreover, a bonafide
religious organization is not required to file, a charitable organizations
annual report as required by Section 309.53 of the state statutes of
Minnesota.
ontained within the application for a gambling license is an application,
art II, in the nanic of I Sylvester KOWSKI a-rid indicating him as the
Gambling Manager. Mr. KOWSKI is a resident of the city of Brooklyn Center,
and has been since Dec. 1, 1971, residing at 3306 65th Ave. North. Mr.
KOWSKI is currently employed by Investors Diversified Services in the IDS
Tower, Suit 310(). Mr. 1� OWSKII_ is in t1i investment securities business,
Resume by Investigator A. Paul MON1 1 hJ!'1i Case 484-06621 Page 2
e d has been e,,iployod by IDS since- March 16, 1979. Prior to that time Mr.
KOWSKI was with the Securities Division of the Northwestern National Bank
of mpls. from September of 1.971 until March of 1979.
In checking the files of the Brooklyn Center Police Department, the Hennepin
County Jail, the Sheriffs Warrant Office, MINCTS and NCIC, Investigator
MONTEE,N finds nothing of a criminal nature under the name of James Sylvester
KOWSKI. Mr. KOWSKI holds a valid Class C drivers license which indicates
only one violation in 1981.
It should be noted that St. Alphonsus Catholic Church has made application
for and received a Class B Gambling License each year since 1979. As
well. during these years, St. Alphonsus Catholic Church has complied with
the regulations concerning the reporting of income and expenses as well as
the distribution of profits as required by State law and the city ordinance.
Accompanying the application for a Class B Gambling License is a letter
addressed to the City Council from the Reverend Father James E. SHEA,
pastor of St. Alphonsus Catholic Church. Father SHEA requests that the
City Council consider a waiver of the $10,000.00 fidelity bond, as
provided by the city ordinance.
Investigator. MONTEEN finds nothing which would preclude St. Alphonsus
Catholic Church or James Sylvester KOWSKI from receiving a Class B
mbling License as issued by the City of Brooklyn Center. The City
uncil must act on the following two matters: 1. A Class B Gambling
License. This reuqires a majority vote of the City Council to pass.
2. The request for a waiver of the $10,000.00 fidelity bond. This requires
the unanimous vote of the City Council to pass.
MFMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splintor, City Manager
FROM: James Lindsay, Chief of Police
DATE: May 13, 1984
SUBJECT: Application for a Class B Gambling License
by the Brooklyn Center American Little League Inc.,
I
Caroline F. BURLE Gambling Manager
Attached please find the completed police investigation
of the Brooklyn Center American Little League, Inc. for
a Class B Gambling License. Caroline Faye BURLEY is
listed as the gambling manager. Investigator MONTEEN
finds nothing which would preclude either the Brooklyn
Center American Little League nor its gambling manager
from obtaining such a license.
In addition to the Class B Gambling License, the Brooklyn
Center American Little Leagi- has made application for a
waiver of the $10,000.00 fidelity bond as allowed under
city ordinance. The City Council must act on the
following two matters: 1. The application for a Class B
Gambling License. This requires a majority vote of the
City Council to pass. 2. A waiver of the $10,000-00
fidelity bond. This requires the unanimous vote of the
City Council to pass.
The Allowing is a resume of the investigation of the Brooklyn Center
Police Department Case Number 84-06623, the application for a Class B
Gambling License by the American Little League as represented by their
ambling Manager Caroline F. BURLEY. This investigation has been
onducted by A. Paul MONTEEN and has been transcribed and typewritten
by Leanne OLDFATHER, Dispatcher for the Brooklyn Center Police Department.
APPLICANT:
Brooklyn Center American Little League
6100 Vincent Ave. No.
Brooklyn Center, MN. 55429
Bus. phone 560-7025
Caroline Faye BURLEY
6801 Zenith Ave. No.
Brooklyn Center, MN. 55429
Home phone 561-9727
MATERIALS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FILE:
Application for a Gambling License
Application for a Gambling License, Part II in the name of Caroline F.
Burley
Application for a Gambling License, Part III Organizational Information
Letter requesting the waiver of the $10,000.00 fidelity bond
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 111he Brooklyn Center American Little League is organized under the auspices
of the American Little Leagues, Inc. and has been formed to implant
firmly in children the ideals of good sportsmanship, honesty, loyalty,
courage and reverence so that they may be finer, stronger and happier
children and will grow to be good, clean, healthy men and women. These
objectives will be achieved by providing supervised, competitive baseball
and/or softball games. The supervisor shall bear in mind that the
entertainment of excellence in athletic skills or winning of games is
secondary, the molding of future men and women is of prime importance.
The registered office of the corporation shall be within the City Hall,
Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County Minn., and the corporation shall have
as its offices that which pleases the Board of Directors, and may from
time to time change as is determined by that board. All meetings of the
membership shall be held at the registered office of the operation, in
the City Hall in Brooklyn Center. Forthe purpose of general operation,
the Brooklyn Center American Little League owns and operates two diamonds
at 61st Ave. No. and Vincent Ave. No. within the corporate limits of the
city of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County Minnesota. These are legally
described as Lot 1, Amberters, Subdivision 218, Hennepin County.
The Brooklyn Center American Little League was established in 1960 and
has approximately 350 active members. Caroline Faye BURLEY is listed
as the executive officer and gambling manager on bahalf of the Brooklyn
111k enter American Little League. Caroline BURLEY is a resident of the
ity of Brooklyn Center, having lived at 6801 Zenith Ave. No. in Brooklyn
Center from 1968 to present. Mrs. BURLEY is employed as a programer and
analyst with Lutheran Brotherhood Insurance Company, whose offices are
Resume by Investigator A. Paul MONTI. Case #84-06623 Page 2
& cated at 625 4th Ave.. So. in N.innoapolis. in checking the files of
the Brooklyn Center Police Department, the Hennepin County Sheriffs
Office, NCIC and MINCIS, Investigator 11',,)NTEEN finds that Mrs. BURLEY
has no criminal record. Furthermore, Virs. BURLEY holds a Class C
drivers license in the state of Minn. �-jhich is valid and without violations.
Accompanying the Application for a Class B Gambling License is a letter
addressed to the Brooklyn Center City Council. This letter requests
the waiver of the required $10,000.00 fidelity bond, as allowed by the
city ordinance.
Investigator MONTEEN notes that the Brooklyn Center American Little
League has obtained a gambling license since 1980, and during those years
has complied with all the aspects of the gambling license requirements
including the reporting of assets and their distribution, as required by
the ordinances of Brooklyn Center and the statutes of the State of Minn.
Investigator MONTEEN finds nothing that would preclude Mrs. BURLEY nor
the American Little League from receiving a Class B gambling license.
The City Council must act on two issues: The Application for a Class B
Gambling License, which would require a majority vote of the City Council
to pass. The waiver of the $10,000.00 fidelity bond, which will require
the unanimous vote of the City Council to pass.
Licenses to be approved by the City Council on May 21 1981 -4 / ....,
AMUSEEE DEVICE L OPE.RA rOR � i
� rlbr a sk howl
6357 N. Lilac Dr. �� ' ..��r ��' �.,!� � " �` n? C
V CQAef of P61156
CIGARETTE LICEESE
a�r:,�r r
Pizz 5001 Draw Ave. N.
C ;i - y Clerk
FOOD ESTABLISHH i T LICENSE
Brooklyn ^ Center Canmuni y u Center 6301 Shingle Cr. Pkwy.
Brooklyn Center National Little Lions Park
Donaldson's Br oo ,dale Center
Pizza Factory 6216 Humboldt Ave. N.
1 � ,
Show Liz Pizza 5931' John Vartin Dr. l�
Sanitarian,r ,
ITINERANT FOOD E STABLIS H MENT LICEN
Orchard School _ � 6223 Major Ave. N.
Sanitarian?=
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS LICENSE
Hoff`rnanfs Inc. 135 E. Third Ave. r
Rassett Mechanical Contractors 1322 Rice St. ���_� .`'r,
Buildi.n Pfficial f 6D
NONPERISHABLE VENDIN MACH LICENSE
Coca Cola _ 1159 Eagn Ind. Rd.
Earle Brogan School 5900 Humboldt Ave. N.
Or- s �� 0
Saniian
POOL TABLE LIC (� d
Lynbrook Bawl 6357 N. Lilac Dr. i i �' _�1�
My C.l. erk
R DWEL LICENSE
Initial:
Elaine V. Nelson 7213 Bryant Ave. N.
Dennis & Linda Fenton 6601 Camden Dr.
Darlene Dimitroff 6442 Indiana Ave. N.
Hallard N. Corey 4201 Lakeside Ave. N. #115
Michael E. Schultz 4207 Lakeside Ave. N. #127
Jonathan Cain 4207 Lakeside Ave. N. #135
Gregg G. Link 5106 Winchester Ln.
Leonard Schollen 5305 4th St. N.
Remewal
BroC7kdale To tCr,`,, Prop rai13 I rUC't<;( :',1.�, 1C)WCY'S APts.
l3YC)f��clyn C I �wr t b7( ; ant CO. t _,ri_t' vIn Farr, 1t�Jt .
Patrick J.
i'hom,a lf:. L vorenze 0 i . r "' i C}I Ave. N.
Hanford orct = 0 r ooklyn Blvd.
Drive
Don Pfau 69131
John S. ischohl 2206 : J,i; Ave. I?.
D.Lr ector of Planning �
and Inspection
SIGN HA NGERS L P Sig N �
(,YO. st;own ; i n Cc �, r;y 101 FAG Central five . NE b� J ��, �(� T -�T� "ll
I3ulldi 0! Ptc ia1_
GEN APPROVAL:
Gerald` G: ' ,``Ci y° Clerk
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR PARTICIPATION IN
T HE 1984 NO SUBURBAN FIRE M AND PARADE
WHEREAS, the North Suburban Fire Muster and Parade, held in conjunction
with the 1984 Earle Brown Days celebration in Brooklyn Center, is in the
finest tradition of American coTu- nunity celebrations; and
WHEREAS, the success of this event is dependent upon the many dedicated
parade participants; and
WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that the efforts and dedication
of the participants in the 1984 North Suburban Fire Muster and Parade should
be recognized and expressed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that the participants in the 1984 North Suburban Fire Muster
and Parade are hereby recognized and congratulated for their outstanding
efforts and contribution to this community event.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the saire:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.