HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 09-13 CCP Regular Session e •
t
` CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
SEPTEMBER 13, 1982
7:00 p.m. -
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Open Forum
5. Approval of Consent Agenda
-All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless .a council member so requests,
in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
*6. Approval of Minutes - August 9, 1982
*7. -Subdivision Bond Release
a. Rudenick -Maahs Addition located along 69th Avenue east of Oliver Avenue
Performance Bond Releases and Reduction
a. Releases:
1< Twin Lake North Apartments, 4582 - 58th Avenue North
2. Brookdale Pontiac, 6801 Brooklyn Boulevard
3. McDonald`s, 5525 Xerxes Avenue'
b. Reduction:
1. K -Mart, 3600 - 63rd Avenue North
Final Plat Evergreen Estates Hussman investment Property located between_
69th and 70th Avenues
Proclamation Declaring September 17 through September 23 as Constitution Week
Public Hearing on Annual Budget and Use of Federal Revenue Sharing
Funds (7:30 p.m.)
12. f Resolutions:
p Accepting Bid and Approving Contract 1982 -F (Drinking Fountain Installation
in Various Neighborhood Parks)
Accepting Bid and Approving Contract 1982 =G (Painting of 1.5 Million Gallon
{ 7v Elevated Tank Adjacent to Brookdale Center)
S �T
Accepting Bid and Approving Contract 1982 -K (Fuel "Dispensing System)
.''Accepting Bid and Approving Contract 1982 --J (Lions Park West Trailway,
Central Park /Garden City Park Extension, Lions Park Tennis Court, Civic
Center Access Improvement, Civic Center Parking Lot Improvement)
/r2 q
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- September 13, 1982
Establishing Lift Station Improvement Project 1982 -26, Accepting
Engineer's Report, Approving Plans and Specifications, and Ordering
Advertisement for Bids (Contract 1982 -N)
-This provides for replacement of Lift Station #3 located on West
Palmer Lake Drive at Urban Avenue.
Establishing Chlorine Room /Storage Room Improvement Project 1982 -27,
Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids
(Contract 1982 -0)
-This resolution provides for an enclosed chlorine storage room at the
Civic Center located within the existing screened enclosure west of the
�t police entrance to City Hall.
Establishing Municipal Service Garage Site Improvement Project 1982 -28
and Appropriating Funds Therefor
(co 11 Approving Agreement for Architectural /Engineering with Lindberg Pierce, -L)
12 � Inc. for Design and Construction Supervisions of Municipal Service Garage
S` Building Improvement Project 1982 -28
asp c, -s
Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids
for Municipal Service Garage Soil Corrections Contract 1982 -P
( 3 Providing for Public Hearing on Proposed, Assessments for: Noxious Weed
Removal and Abatement of Unsafe and Unsanitary Conditions
- This resolution provides for a public hearing to be held on October 4, 1982
on the proposed assessment rolls for the cost of weed cutting, and cleaning
S� of the residence at 621.3 Beard Avenue North.
/ Establishing Sanitary Sewer Rate Schedule for the Elderly
( Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for a Radio Central Dispatch
T Communications Equipment
)r75 ,fir' Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Police Department Remodeling
-It is recommended the low bid of C. 0. Field Company in the amount of
$10,875 be accepted.
Authorizing Purchase of Portable Radios
S
�r1r7 Authorizing Purchase of Mobile Radio Equipment and DVP Equipment
Public Hearing (8:00 p.m.)
Notice of the proposed assessments on all public hearings has been sent to the ,
owners of all benefited properties. Notice of the hearings has been published
in the official newspaper.
Public Hearing on Special Assessments for Earle Brown Improvement Project
1982 -08 (street light installation along extension of Earle Brown Drive)
1 Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll
6
A
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- September 13, 1982
- Public. Hearing on Special Assessments: Diseased Shade Tree Removals,
Public Utility Hookups and Delinquent Public Utility Accounts
8� s�
q Resolution Certifying Assessments for Diseased Shade Tree Removal
�S Resolution Certifying Assessments for Public Utility Hookups
Resolution Certifying Assessments for Delinquent Public Utility_
Accounts
Planning Commission Items (8:15 p.m.)
Planning Commission Application No. 82030 submitted by Marie Reyes for
a variance from Section 35 -400 of the zoning ordinance to allow a two -car
garage to be set back 25 feet from the front property line at 5700 Camden
Avenue North, rather than the normal 35 feet. This item was considered at
the August 12, 1982 Planning Commission meeting and it was recommended that
( the application be denied. This item was tabled at the August 23, 1982
City Council meeting at the request of the applicant.
L
15. Ordinances:
-" An Ordinance Amending Chapters 34 and 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding
Home Occupations
-This ordinance is offered for a first reading,
' - -- - -__ b. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding Outside
Storages in an I -1 Zoning District
-This ordinance is _offered for a first reading.
-
C. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Requiring Minimum
- District Requirements and Special Requirements in a C -2 Zoning District
This ordinance is offered for a first reading.
An Ordinance Amending - Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Relative to Rezoning
, Certain Land from _Rl to R3
-This ordinance amendment is the,final_ step in rezoning the land authorized
through the approval of Planning Commission Application No. 82020 submitted.
by Hussman Investment Company on August 30, 1982. This ordinance is offered
for a first reading.
An Ordinance Amending Chapter 19 of the City Ordinances Regarding Public _
Nuisances
-This ordinance was first read on August 9,1 1982, published on August 26,
1982, and is recommended for a second reading this evening.
An Ordinance Amending Chapter 1 of the City Ordinances Regarding Animals
-This ordinance was first read on August 9, 1982, published on August 26,
1982, and is recommended for a second reading this evening.`
An Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 of the City Ordinances Regarding Sunday
Sales of Intoxicating Liquors
This ordinance was first read on August 9, 1982, published on August 19, 1982
and is recommended for a second reading this evening.
y -
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -4- September 13, 1982
8 An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 Relative to Rezoning Certain Land from
C2 to R3
-This ordinance was first read on August 9, 1982, published on August 19,
1982, and is recommended for a second reading this evening.
An Ordinance Amending Chapter 23 Regarding License Fees for Kiddie Rides
This ordinance was first read on August 23, 1982, published on September 2,
1982, and is recommended for a second reading this evening.
TJ
Appointment of Additional Standby Judges for Primary Election
Declaration of Suplus Property
Approving the sale of two vehicles for public auction.
18. Discussion Items:
n Ordinance Amendment
- ShowBiz Pizza has requested minor changes to Chapter 23 of the City
Ordinances to allow to allow tokens to be awarded for free games on
their machines.
' Park and Recreation Commission Report on Marlin Park Playground Equipment
UpdatR --Qn Park Bonding Program
Pizza Facto o
--
. Licenses '
Adjournment
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA i
REGULAR SESSION
AUGUST 9, 1982
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order
by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:07 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Works
Sy Knapp, Director of Finance Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning & Inspection Ron
Warren, City Attorney Richard Schieffer, Assistant City Engineer Jim Grube, Director
of Park & Recreation Gene Hagel, and Administrative Assistant Tom Bublitz.
INVOCATION
The invocation was offered by Councilmember Scott.
OPEN FORUM
Mayor Nyquist noted he had received two requests for the Open Forum session this
evening, one from Mr. Al Beisner, 7549 Mariner Pt., Maple Grove, and Mr. Lou Howard,
2218 -55th Avenue North, Brooklyn Center. Mr. Howard stated that he would wait with
his comments until the resolution on Lions Park was discussed. Mayor Nyquist
recognized Mr. Al Beisner who stated he works for Lombard Properties, located at
6707 Shingle Creek Parkway in Brooklyn Center. He stated his subject for discussion
this evening was the development process and approval process in the City, and
'fi with regard to the Hi Crest Estates Development. He stated
S
specifically g q
that he believes the development process and the approval process was
misused in
this project. _
Mr. Beisner stated that the Hi Crest Estates plan was brought before the Planning
Commission on June 17, 1982 and that the site and building plan was approved at
this meeting. He proceeded to review elevations of the Hi .Crest Square Estates
Project. He noted that Mr. John DeVries, developer of the Earle Brown Farm-Estates
townhouse development, learned of the Hi Crest Square Estates plan at the June 17,
1982 Planning Commission meeting. On June 21, he pointed out that he reviewed the
Hi Crest Square plans. He stated that after his review of the plans he met with -a
City Official and an Elected Official and expressed his concern that something was
running afoul in the approval process. He stated he contacted a representative of
the Hi Crest Square Estates Project and the representative stated that the submission
of the plans for Hi Crest Square Estates was a mistake and that he was not intending
to use the plans for the project. He explained that a day or two before the Planning
Commission meeting, held in the first part of July, the applicant pulled the Hi Crest
Square Estates Project off the Planning Commission.agenda. He explained that on
July 15 of this year, the Planning Commission approved Phase I of the Hi Crest Square
Estates Project on a five to two vote. He added that on July 26, 1982, the project
came before the City Council. He explained he tried to settle the problems with the
8 -9 -82 -1-
Hi Crest Square Estates representative but that they could arrive at no solution.
Mr. Beisner indicated he thought there would be a public forum, at the July 26,
1982 City Council meeting, regarding the project but that he did not get a chance
to speak. He stated that the process leaves something wanting in the way business
.is done in Brooklyn Center.
Mr. Beisner stated that the reason given for the use of the plan by the applicant
was that a deadline had to be met for approval and the applicant did not intend to
use the plan. He added the property for the project was rezoned and he was told
this plan was used to show to the neighborhood groups during the discussions
centering on rezoning. He added that, for the Earle Brown Farm Estates townhouse
project, we used the plans to show to the neighborhood and told the neighborhood
residents that the townhouses would be built according to the plan.
Mr. Beisner proceeded to review the April 1982 grading plans for Hi Crest Square
Estates and pointed out that they are very similar to those in the Earle Brown Farm
Estates. He added the Earle Brown Farm Estates development has surveys with the
same dimensions as the Hi Crest Square Estates on the plat, with regard to the
width of the units.
Mr. Beisner stated he believes there is an obligation between the City Council and
staff and developer to do what is best for the City, and that he did not think
what happened with the Hi Crest Square Estates application is a good development
procedure. He added that he does not believe the process is what the City wants
or what anybody else wants to follow. He stated he thought the process was wrong
and tried to let the system work itself out but it never got the proper hearing .
that it should have. He stated this is the most controversial and poorest example
of how things are done in the City. He added if the names were erased on the plan.
and Deil Gustafson's name was placed on the plans, he believes they would not have
received the same type of treatment. Mr. Beisner stated that, in conclusion, he
believes he was treated unfairly and the process was a sham.
.Councilmember Lhotka commented that at the last City Council meeting the Council
approved a portion of the plans and that this portion approved was not disputed.
Mr. Beisner 'stated that Councilmember Lhotka was correct but to get as far as the
process got, in his opinion, was not right. Councilmember Lhotka stated he could
not recall, as long as he has been on the Council, that a developer brought in
plans that the developer did not develop himself.
The City Manager commented that the staff proceeded according to the ordinance and
the staff did not check the plans to see if they were a duplicate of another plan.
Councilmember Lhotka inquired what procedures were taken once it was suspected that
the plans were duplicates. The City Manager pointed out that if the plans are
certified by an architect and meet the City ordinance requirements, the dispute
over who owns the plans is solely between the developers. Councilmember Lhotka
inquired as to the City's responsibility and inquired whether or not the City
should stop the process until the dispute is resolved. The City Manager stated
the City did not accept the plans, except for the duplexes, and also added that
when ordinance requirements are met the City is obliged to accept the plans. He
added there are also time periods stated in the ordinance that must be met with
regard to action on the plans by the City. He noted if the City stops the project
improperly the City is technically responsible for the cost of the delays.
8 -9 -82 -2-
I
The Director of Planning & Inspection stated that after the June 17 Planning
Commission meeting he became aware of the dispute over the plans. He pointed out
before the plans went to the City Council from the Planning Commission, the applicant
requested tabling the plans. He stated he believes the process was working by the
fact the plans were resubmitted to the Planning Commission. Mr. Beisner then inquired
whether the plans were certified. The Director of Planning & Inspection stated that
the plans were resubmitted for the July Planning Commission meeting, and they were
not signed, but he added, that this is not uncommon.
The City Attorney explained that the procedure set out in the ordinance were followed
in this case. He discussed the matter at a staff meeting and advised the staff the
dispute between the developer and the applicant is not sufficient to stop the process.
He pointed out the City Council cannot stop the process to allow an applicant and an
adversary to sort out their differences. He added the City could have a law suit
against the City if the project was halted without sufficient authority. He pointed
out the process was carried on precisely according to the ordinance and the City
Council cannot be involved in a speculative decision making process.
Discussion continued between the City Attorney and Mr. Beisner regarding the develop-
ment process and the site plan and zoning approvals for Hi Crest Square Estates.
The City Attorney pointed out the distinction between a zoning change and a site and
building plan approval as regards the ordinance requirements.
Mr. Beisner stated he generally thought the City persuaded applicants to conform to
a traditional development process and in this case the process was not followed. He
pointed out, for the Earle Brown Farm Estates Townhouse development a public
hearing was held on the subdivision approval on June 22, 1981 and that the plat
approval on June 28, 1982, also got a public hearing. He stated he does not think
a full disclosure was given, and emphasized that he is not trying to alienate
an thinks the ordinance is vague
t o d g
anyone, but he feels strongly about th is matter
Y g Y
on when a hearing is required. The Director of Planning ,& Inspection pointed out
that with a site and building plan approval no public hearing is required and
that the ordinance is specific in this instance.
Mr. Beisner stated, that traditionally he has had an opportunity to sit down and
work out problems; but in this case he was not given the same opportunity. Council -
' member Lhotka inquired whether Mr. Beisner contacted the.city_.staff with regard to
this matter. Mr. Beisner stated he did contact the staff but the application was
back on the Planning Commission agenda. He stated the applicant felt no necessity
to sit down and work out the problem and at that time the attorneys for the applicant-
and himself were involved. He stated he doesn't feel a full opportunity was•accorded
to sit down and work out the problem at the meeting.
The Director of Planning & Inspection stated the Hi Crest Square Estates preliminary
plat hearing was held by the Planning Commission and that traditionally, the City
Council has held a public hearing where the Planning Commission holds a public
hearing, although, it is not required by ordinance. Councilmember Hawes comr.
that he understands Mr. Beisner's concern but he believes the City has no concern
and is an innocent bystander in this instance. Councilmember Lhotka stated he agreed
with Councilmember Hawes but added that he believed if something was going on that
was not correct,he believes an attempt should be made to correct it. He added that
he appreciates the ordinance requirements but he believes the City staff and the City
8 -9 -82 -3-
I
w
Council have an obligation to try to work out the problem.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Nyquist inquired if an Council members had an items they would request remov 0
Y Yq q Y Y
from the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Theis requested that item 8 be.removed from
the Consent'Agenda.
Mayor Nyquist commented.that the resolution declaring August 19 as Don Poss Day in
Brooklyn Center is on the Consent Agenda, but he would like to note that in addition
to Don Poss Day, Mr.. Poss is also receiving the good neighbor award from WCCO radio.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 26, 1982
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and.seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
approve the minutes of the City Council meeting of July 26, 1982 as submitted. Voting
- -in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, and Hawes. Voting against:
none." The motion passed. Councilmember Theis abstained from the approval of the
minutes as he was not present at the July 26, 1982 meeting.
PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASES
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
approve the release of the performance guarantee on the Ponds Plat VI, Ponds Drive
and Unity Avenue North in the amount of $10,000. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist,
Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. - Voting against: none. The motion
passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
approve the release of the remaining performance guarantee on Harron United Methodist
Church, 5452 Dupont Avenue North in the amount of $1,000. Voting in favor: Mayor
Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none.
The motion passed unanimously.
APPROVAL OF ELECTION JUDGES FOR PRIMARY ELECTION SEPTEMBER 14, 1982
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
approve the list of election judges submitted by the City Clerk for the September
14, 1982 primary election. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka,
Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -140
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1981 -B (SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1981 -02 AND FREEWAY BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.
1981 -04)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
8 -9 -82 -4-
n
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -141
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND PROVIDING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -08 (STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION ON EARLE
BROWN DRIVE)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -142
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FOR PARK SHELTER IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1982 -17 (CONTRACT 1982 -I)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -143
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING BROOKLYN CENTER
LAIMIN 2 A N
OC G AUGUST 19 198 S DON POSS DAY
r
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis and the following oted against the same. none whereupon n said resolution
e
g g . P
was declared duly passed and adopted.
y e n ado
P P
RESOLUTION NO. 82 - 144
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING AUGUST 11, 1982 AS TIM LAUDNER DAY IN BROOKLYN CENTER
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by .
member Bill Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon the followin. voted in
P g � g
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution.
was declared duly passed and adopted.
LICENSES
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
approve the following list of licenses:
8 -9 -82 -5-
rt
f
CIGARETTE LICENSE
Theisen Vending 3804 Nicollet Ave. S.
T- Wrights 5800 Shingle Cr. Pkwyv
FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
T-
Wrights 5800 Shingle Cr. Pkwy.*
kwY
GARBAGE AND REFUSE COLLECTION LICENSE
Mengelkoch Company 119 N.E. 14th St.
ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
B. C. Jaycee Women Evergreen Park
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS LICENSE
Sunburst Heating & Air Conditioning 1556 Oakways
NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
Life (Full service vending) 4603 Folwell Dr.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
SUBDIVISION BOND RELEASE - THE PONDS PLATS I, II, III, V, AND VI
The Director of Public Works reviewed a memorandum regarding the performance bond
release for the Ponds Plats I, II, III, V, and VI and recommended the release of
the remaining subdivision bonds for the Ponds and pointed out that the site performance
bond which is being retained by the Planning Department, will be extended to cover
the work remaining in the Ponds.
There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
release the remaining subdivision bonds for the Ponds Plats I, II, III, V, alid VI
in the amount of $101,500. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka,
Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED)
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -145
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM TO HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR CONSIDERATION AS PART OF THE URBAN
HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION, IN ACCORD WITH
THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDED
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Rich Theis, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
8 -9 -82 -6-
The City Manager introduced a Resolution Rejecting Bids and Authorizing Advertisement
for New Bids for Water Tower Painting Project No. 1982 -15 (Contract 1982 -G). The
Director of Public Works reviewed the bids for the water tower painting project and
explained the low bidder did not submit a statement of qualifications as required
in the specifications. He added that there are irregularities in the second low
bidders proposal form also. He pointed out representatives of the low bidder are
present this evening.
Mayor Nyquist recognized the attorney representing Allied Painting, the low bidder
on the project. The attorney for Allied Painting stated he is concerned about the
staff comments from the City of St. Cloud and Robbinsdale regarding Allied Painting's
work in their cities and stated that he believes they had an impact on the rejection
of the bids. He stated he believes the dispute in the St. Cloud case was made in
good faith over a disagreement on the contract and that he believes the project in
St. Cloud was done properly and he pointed out that payment was finally made. He
added that he also represented Allied Painting in the Robbinsdale case and he also
believes a good faith dispute over an interpretation of the contract. He added that
the work done by Allied Painting in Robbinsdale was not defective and he expressed
a concern over the letter from the Robbinsdale Public Works Director. He proceeded
to review a list of successful projects by Allied Painting, including the projects
mentioned in the Director of Public Works memorandum. He suggested to the Council .
that the bidder is a reputable contractor.
The Director of Public Works pointed out the specifications on the project requested
the bidder to submit a statement of qualifications and that a form was provided but
that Allied Painting.left the form blank.
Mayor Nyquist recognized Mr. Ralph Reese, who stated he was the President of Allied
Painting. Mr. Reese stated the reason he did not submit a statement of qualification
is that it was so close to the bid opening date that he did not feel it was necessary
and that he has never had a problem on this small a mistal�e before.
The Director of Public Works stated he did not believe that it is the City's obligation
to go after the contractor for information required in the bid. Councilmember Lhotka
inquired whether the bid opening was set for a specific time. The Director of Public
Works stated that the bid was set for a specific time and date. Councilmember Lhotka
inquired what would be the consequences allowing the bidder to bring in additional
information. The City Attorney advised that it is a very precarious situation if the
bidder comes in with information after the bid opening deadline and that he recommended _
that the City not consider this information since it is part of the specifications.
The attorney for Allied Painting stated that the contractor made a good faith.bid
and it was a low bid and that all of the bids are now known for the project and it
is up for grabs if the bids are resubmitted. He stated he does not think the competitive
bidding process would be served by'rejecting the .bids.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 - 146
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:.
RESOLUTION REJECTING BIDS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR NEW BIDS FOR WATER
TOWER PAINTING PROJECT NO. 1982 -15 (CONTRACT 1982 -G)
8 -9 -82 -7-
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted:
The City Manager introduced a Resolution Authorizing City Manager to Foreclose on
Bid Security of Bauer - Reamer Excavating for Failure to Perform Under Provisions of
Contract 1982 -F and a Resolution Ordering Advertisement for Bids for Neighborhood
Parks Improvement Project 1982 -13 (Drinking Fountain Installation - Contract 1982 -F).
The Director of Public Works explained the contractor refused to enter into a contract
with the City for the work and therefore the staff is submitting the foreclosure
resolution and the readvertisement for bids resolution for the project.
The Attorney explained he talked to the attorney representing the contractor
and was told that the contractor does not intend to enter into a contract with the
City. He stated he is recommending the bid bond be forfeited. He added that he
is also recommending a change in the specifications regarding liquidated damages.
The City Attorney pointed out that the contractor's attorney claimed that the
contractor has never worked in Hennepin County with water tables requiring de- watering.
The Director of Public Works stated the staff discussed the de- watering requirement
with the contractor and also pointed out that Shingle Creek is located only a few
feet away from the installation.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -147
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO FORECLOSE ON BID SECURITY OF BAUER - REAMER
EXCAVATING FOR FAILURE TO PERFORM UNDER PROVISIONS OF CONTRACT 1982 -F
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Rich Theis, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Riche
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -148
Member Bill Hawes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1982 -13 (DRINKING FOUNTAIN INSTALLATION - CONTRACT 1982 -F)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Gene Lhotka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resuiutio.n
was declared duly passed and adopted.
The City Manager introduced a Resolution Establishing Lions Park West Trailway
Improvement Project No. 1982 -18, Approving Plans and Specifications, and Directing
Advertisement for Bids (Contract 1982 -J).
8 -9 -82 -8-
Councilmember Theis inquired what Alternate No. 3 would provide on the trail project.
The Director of Public Works explained Alternate No. 3 would be a minimal wood chip
trail and would not be suitable for an improved trail, to be built on it. Council-
Member Lhotka inquired whether LAWCON funds were designated for this project. The
City Manager pointed out that the project was funded 90% by federal and state dollars
and 10% local funding. Councilmember Lhotka then inquired where the dollars would
go if they were not used on this project. The City Manager explained that if the
federal and state dollars were not used on trails in this project, they would be
returned to the state and federal governments.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve the Resolution Establishing Lions Park West Trailway Improvement Project
No. 1982-18, Approving Plans and Specifications, and Directing Advertisement for
Bids (Contract 1982-J), and to insert the cost of Alternate No. 1 as described in
the August 6, 1982 memorandum titled Extension of.Trailway System Through Park
West Improvement Project No. 1982-3-8.
Councilmember Hawes stated that he believes the high cost of this project is one
of the reasons why the federal and state governments are in as bad a shape as they
are financially. Councilmember Lhotka stated that he believes in theory that
Councilmember Hawes is correct but if the City does not use the funds the state
and federal governments will allocate them to another project.
Mayor Nyquist called for a roll call vote on the motion on the floor. Councilmember
Hawes voted no, Councilmember Scott voted no, Councilmember Lhotka voted yes, Council-
member Theis voted yes, and Mayor Nyquist voted no. The motion did not pass.
RESOLUTION NO. 82-149
Member Bill Hawes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption with
the condition that Alternate construction procedure Number 3, as described in the
Director of Public Work's memorandum dated August 6, 1982, be inserted and made
part of the resolution:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LIONS PARK WEST TRAILWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982-18,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICIATIONS, AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (CONTRACT
1982-J)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and the
following voted against the same: Gene Lhotka, whereupon said resolution was
declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 82-150
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CENTRAL PARK/GARDEN CITY TRAILWAY EXTENSION IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1982-19, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT
FOR BIDS (CONTRACT 1982-J)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes.
B-9-82 -9-
Discussion ensued among Council members regarding the merits of approving the
Central Park/Garden City Trailway Extension Improvement Project as opposed to the Lions
Park West Trailway Improvement Project. Councilmember Scott commented that the
Central- Park/Garden City Trailway would serve a greater number of people than the
Lions Park Trailway Project. Councillmember Hawes commented he believes Central
Park will have the opportunity to be a first class park and he would support it.
Discussion ensued regarding the cost of the trails in Central Park and Councilmember
Lhotka commented that, approving one trailway and rejecting the other does not
seem to make sense to him. Councilmember Hawes commented that the original project
budget for the Central Park/Garden City Trailway was $47,234 and that if the $16,000
deleted from the previous project could be used for the other project, the $16,000
added to the $47,000 budgeted would nearly bring the funding up to the cost of the
project. The City Manager explained that the City can only apply for a certain
dollar amount from LAWCON each year and that is why the project had to be built
over a number of years. He pointed out that Councilmember Hawes is correct but
there are other additional funds that can be used for the project.
The Director of Public Works pointed out that the staff has obtained a budget
amendment from the state and federal government based on the approval of the projects
as originally proposed, and that to use the $16,000 on another project, another
amendment would have to be made.
Mayor Nyquist called for a vote on the motion on the floor. Voting in favor: mayor
Nyquist, Councilmembers Scott, Theis, and Hawes. Voting against: Councilmember
Lhotka. The motion passed.
The City Manager introduced a Resolution Establishing Lions Park Tennis Court Improvement
Project No. 1982-20, Approving Plans and Specifications, and Directing Advertisement
for Bids (Contract 1982-J). The City Manager noted that the project would be for
the base work only and would not include construction of the tennis court. The
Director of Public Works reviewed the possible location of tennis courts and
recommended a two stage process be conducted, the first stage being the soil
correction work and the second being the actual court construction.
Councilmember Scott expressed a concern over the potential for additional costs
if the soil beneath the tennis court continued to sink after construction. The
Director of Public Works stated that he believes adequate soil borings have been
taken for the project.
Discussion ensued regarding utilization of tennis courts within the City and the
Director of Parks & Recreation commented that his department staff have noticed a
decline in the number of persons registering for tennis lessons, and he believes
tennis activity is leveling off.
The City Manager stated that, as part of the bond issue, the tennis court was brought
up at neighborhood meetings during the bond issue discussions. The court, he pointed
out, was requested by the residents in the neighborhood and that there are no tennis
courts close by. He stated that the staff responded to the residents by stating
.that the matter of the courts in Lions Park would be reviewed as separate from the
bond issue. Finally, he pointed out, the Park & Recreation Commission recommended
the tennis courts be constructed at Lions Park predicated on a need for tennis courts
8-9-82 -10-
in that area. Councilmember Scott stated that she believes there is a need but she
is concerned with the cost of the courts.
Park & Recreation Commissioner. Jackie Albright stated that the staff originally
proposed single courts at Bellvue and Lions, but that the double courts were
reconunended for Lions Park due to the potential for that Park becoming a larger
recreational site.
Mayor Nyquist recognized Mr. Lou Howard, 2218 55th Avenue North, who stated, that
in the summer. of 1980 neighborhood meetings were held and he was under the impression
that a golf course was being considered in the area of Lions Park, and that at the
meetings the Lions Park neighborhood expressed an interest in tennis courts. He
pointed out there are no adult facilities in Lions Park and that four to five persons
in the neighborhood gathered a petition of names to request a tennis court in Lions
Park, and that the Park & Recreation Commission considered the construction of the
tennis courts, and he assumed that the City Council would give consideration to this
recommendation. He added that tennis has declined in the past few years but so have
other things, due to the economy. He explained that the southeast neighborhood is
in a state of change, that younger people are moving into the neighborhood and that
sometimes it is worth the money to appease and show the residents that their . —
requests are considered. Mr. Howard also pointed out that the Grandview courts are
usually occupied.
The Director of Parks & Recreation stated that the City has not held tennis lessons
at Grandview Park for two-years but that it is used once a week by the tennis club.
Councilmember Lhotka stated he supports the project and that the people in the area
want a tennis facility. He added that he believes this part of the City deserves
the project, especially if the golf course is built in the future.
Mayor'Nyquist recognized Jackie Albright, member of the Park & Recreation Commission, who
stated that the main purpose of the bond issue was to improve the parks and that she
was tired of seeing all the development go to Central Park.
Councilinember Scott inquired what the original budget was for the tennis court at
Lions Park. The City Manager explained that $25,000 was budgeted and that the
additional soil work required would come from the Capital Project Fund. Councilmember
Hawes asked what assurance can be given that the court won't sink further after the
soil correction work is completed. The City Manager stated that it is a very costly
item to accomplish the soil correction work, and that the staff would not want to
re -do it, so extra precautions were taken in the soil borings to determine what work
was required for this area. The Assistant City Engineer.reviewed the depth of the
soil. borings taken in the area and discussion continued regarding the construction
procedures for the court.
Councilmember Theis stated that he would like to see the City accomplish what it
originally set out to do faith the tennis courts.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -151
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
8 -9 -82 -11-
y
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LIONS PARK TENNIS COURT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -20,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (CONTRACT
1982 -J)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member_ Rich Their, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
RECES
The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 9:25 p.m. and reconvened at 9:45 p.m.
RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -152
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CIVIC CENTER ACCESS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -21,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (CONTRACT
1982 -J)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded b
p g g Y Y
II I member Bill Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -153
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -22,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (CONTRACT
1982 -J)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -154
Member Bill Hawes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING FUNDS FROM COUNCIL CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT TO EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS ACCOUNT FOR RADIO ACTIVATED CIVIL DEFENSE SIREN SYSTEM
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Rich Theis, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
8 -9 -82 -12-
• PLANNIN COM ITE MS
PLANNING COMMI A 110.82023 SUBMIT'T'ED BY BERGST REALT COMPANY FO R
A11T i.IDI D 13U f IDING PLAN APPROV F OR PHASE I OT THE I C RE ST T SQUARE EST IN
1300 P OC K ON TH E SOUTH SIT), OF 69I11 AV . NOr'TH
The Director of Planning & lrlJr�ection pointed nut that this application was approved
by the Planning Co,T at the July 15, 1982 meeting and that approval of the
item was deferred at the July 26, 1.982 City Council meeting until the plans were
signed by a registered architect. He pointed out that at the July 26 City Council
meeting, the Council approved the master site plan, grading, and utility and land-
scape plan. He explained tht_ total. project was a 60 unit townhouse project. He
explained approval of the two six -unit buildings in the project was deferred on
July 26, 1982 until the plans could be certified by a registered architect. He
proceeded to review the elevations and exterior construction of the project. lie
stated he believes the plans as submitted are in order and that he recommends approval
for the two six -unit buildings. He stated approval is recommended subject to the
12 conditions set by the Planning Cormnissi.on at its July 15, 1982 meeting which he
reviewed for Council members.
Mayor Ny uist inquired whether the certification on the plans submitted this evening
q q P
is accurate, since the certification states that the plans were prepared by or
supervised directly by the architect signing the plans. Mr. Hal Pierce, who is the
architect, whose name appears on the plans, stated that he reviewed the plans but
that he did not prepare them or supervise their preparation.
Mr.- William Clelland, attorney for the applicant, stated that the past practice of
the City was not to require certification until the building permits are issued
Ile stated that requiring approval at this time is a departure from past practices.
The Director of Planning & Inspection commented that the plans have been submitted
both ways in the past, and that designers have submitted preliminary plans not
signed by a registered architect and that later the final plans were certified by
an architect. Mr. Clelland requested that the literal interpretation of the ordinance
not be used in this case since the actual preparation of the plans will be done by
Mr. Pierce, a registered architect. Mayor Nyquist noted that this is not what the
certification on the plans states. Mr. Clelland suggested. that Mr. Pierce be allowed
to review the plans and give assurances that he will be involved in the development
of the final plans.
Councilmember Lhotka inquired as to the time frame for approval. The.Director of
Planning & Inspection stated that the time period is 30 days from the day it is
referred from the Planning Commission to the City Council, in this case,.July 26,
1982. - Councilmember Lhotka then inquired whether the applicant could meet with the
other party in the dispute. Mr. Clelland stated it is,a misconception that the
two parties have not.met, and he pointed out that he has met with representatives
of the applicant and pointed out that the applicant is not present this evening.
Mr. James.Merila, representing the applicant, requested the City Council take action
on the first reading of the zoning ordinance amendment this evening but that he has
no objection to tabling Application No. 82023 for two weeks.
8 -9 -82 -13-
There was a motion by Councilme-mber Lhotka to table consideration of Planning
Commission Application No. 82023 for two weeks. The motion died for lack of a
second.
Mr. Merila commented that after discussion with legal counsel., he would request
that Application No. 82023 be approved this evening. Mr. Clelland stated that he
believes no purpose would be served to meet with Mr. DeVries and Mr. Beisner, and
that the plans the Council has before them this evening were drawn by a firm with
no previous affiliation with the Earle Brown Farm Estates project.
Mr. Mark Hagerty, attorney for DeVries Builders, addressed the Council and stated
that the only difference between the plans Mr. DeVries has seen and the ones before
the Council this evening is that Mr. Pierce has signed them. Mr. Pierce stated
that Mr. Hagerty was correct and that the plans were not changed.
Councilmember Theis stated that the two parties appear to be at an impasse and that
he is disappointed in the applicant's attorney's response to Councilmemher Lhotka's
request. He stated that the integrity of people have been challenged in this
situation and he hopes that the clouds over the issue will be cleared up.
The City Attorney stated that on site and building plan approvals the City Council
does not have much discretion and that the ordinance is very specific. He added
that the question is whether the City will be involved in a law suit by not taking
action this evening on something they would take action on at the next Council
meeting, if the item were tabled. He added that the risk is that if the project
fails between now and two weeks the City may be brought into a lawsuit for damages.
The City Attorney stated he would advise, if there was no just reason to table the
application, the City Council should act on the application this evening. He stated
he believes the controversy is totally unrelated to what the City Council has done
or not done, or what the staff has done or not done. He stated that the dispute
among the two parties belongs in a court room.
Mr. Mark Hagerty, attorney for DeVries Builders, stated that the City staff had
assured he and Mr. DeVries that a public hearing would be held on the site and
building plan application at the last Council meeting. The City Manager questioned
Mr. Hagerty's assertion and stated he would take exception to that assertion. Mr.
Hagerty stated that he was informed by an individual in the administrative offices
that there would be a public hearing on the site and building plan application at
the July 26 City Council meeting.
The Director of Planning & Inspection stated that neither Mr. Hagerty nor Mr. Beisner
have contacted him regarding this matter, and that he would think that if someone
were interested in the application process they would contact him, considering his
position with the City.
Discussion continued briefly regarding the application before the Council. Mayor
Nyquist then inquired as to the Council's wishes regarding Application No. 82023.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Hawes to
approve Application No. 82023 subject to the following conditions:
8-9-82 -14-
1. Building plans are s to review and approval by the Building official
with resp(, to aPplicab-Ie code:; prior to the issuance of permits.
2. Grading, drainage, util,if and _terming plans are subject to review and
approval J
?y f City 1�, J
,11, -1 3J I prior to the issuance of pem..its; and
Specifically, should conforitl to t revisions and requirements set forth
in the Assistant City ErIq.i1-eCr.s memo dated 6-14-82.
3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an
amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted prior
to the issuance of permits to as'sure completion of approved site improve-
ments for the entire developrt
4. Any outside trash disposal facilities shall be appropriately screened
f rom vie-w.
5. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34
of the City Ordinances.
6. 8612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas.
7. All areas regraded, but no developed according to plan shall be seeded
to maintain adequate ground cover for dust control.
8. The Assistant City Engineer shall report to the City Council on how the
proposed plan compares with other ponds on private developments in the
City and on whether the proposed pond will fulfill its function as both
a drainage control device and an aesthetic asset to the townhouse develop-
ment, with an acceptable safety risk.
9. Plan approval acknowledges the proposed landscape treatment along the
east side of the development as acceptable a screening in lieu of the
ordinance required 4' high opaque fence.
10. The building plans shall be certified by a registered Minnesota Architect
prior to the issuance of building permits if so required by the State
Building Codes Division.
11. The site plans shall be amended to incorporate a system to supplement
natural ground water inflow into the proposed pond thus, maintaining a
constant water level elevation of 8,40 feet (U.S.G.S. Datum).
12. The building plan for the six-unit buildings shall be as set forth in'
in the plans approved by the City Council on this date. Any departure
from these plans shall be resubmitted to the City Council for approval.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
ORDINANCES
The City manager introduced An ordinance Amending Chapter 19 of the City 'Ordinances
Regarding Public Nuisances and An Ordinance Amending Chapter 1 of the City Ordinances
B-9-82
7
Regarding Animals. Ile explained the ordinance regarding public nuisances is being
proposed in conjunction w1 `_th to Chapter 1 of the City Ordinances regarding
-
animals, and that the or(linance amencli.nq Chapter I reflects a comprehensive ame'-ndmen
of the Chapter of the City Ordinances regarding animals. He added that the ordina
are offered for a firs reading this evening and it is recor.'anended a public hearing
on the ordinances be scheduled for 8:00 p.m. on Septei 13, 1982.
The City Attorney explained the City's current nuisaj, ordinance is very brief and
the ordinance amendment proposed would substantially expand the current ordinance.
He proceeded to review the ordinance and pointed out that Section 19-101 of the
proposed ordinance essentially adopts the state code- and common law regarding public
nuisances. He pointed out that Section 19-103 outlines a -list of common nuisances.
He pointed out that paragraph 9 in Section 19-103 re-adopts the existing ordinance
language.
The City Attorney pointed out that Section 19-104 adds a section to the public
nuisance ordinance regarding the limitation on keeping of animals and added that
the City Council must decide on how they want to regulate cats, such as requiring
rabies vaccination for cats.
In review of the ordinance amending Chapter 1 of the City Ordinances regarding animals,
the City Attorney noted that the ordinance amendment is a comprehensive amendment
of the existing ordinance. He reviewed several. key points of the ordinance amend-
ment including changing the current time for license renewal of dogs to run concurrently
with the length of the effective rabies vaccination for the animal.
With regard to the private kennel- and commercial kennel licenses, he reviewed the
licensing procedure, and recommended that in conjunction with the commercial kennel
requirements the ordinance amendment adopts the USDA standards by reference. He
also reviewed•the section of the ordinance dealing with prohibition against keeping
live wild animals and wild animals native to Minnesota. With regard to the vaccination
of cats for rabies, he pointed out, it is somewhat futile to require a vaccination
without requiring licensing of the animal.
Councilmember Lhotka stated that he would like to suggest a change for the time
period, a private kennel license would be effective to limit the time period for a
specific time, such as four to six months. In other words, he pointed out, the private
kennel license would he effective for a specific period, such as four to six months
and would expire after that period. Councilmember Theis stated that he likes the
idea of limiting the private kennel license to a,definite time period. Councilmember
Lhotka added that he would like to see the private kennel license nonrenewable and
used only for emergency type purposes. Councilmember Scott questioned the policy
of limiting the time period for the private kennel licenses.
Mayor Nyquist recognized Mrs. Jesse Sandvol who stated that she has a definite
attachment to her dogs and that it would be difficult to part with them, and added
that she agrees with Councilmember Scott regarding the time limit on the license.
Councilmember Lhotka left the table at 11:05 p.m.
Councilmember Hawes pointed out that the Section 19-104 of the ordinance refers'to
8-9-82 -16-
four. or more cats. The ordinance Cha
ptcr 1. also refers to four or more
cats with reference to I. of ani)�Ial-s but that on page 11 of the ordinance
w the lang describos mere thin four cats. He noted there appears to be
a-discrepancy beLweon the t
. - - 11
There was a motion by Councllw drbei- Scott ai3d seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
approvc for first -rea.ding An ordinai 1, ici-�dinc- Chapter 19 of the City Ordinance--
Regarding Public Nuisances and Art Ordinance Amending Chapter 1 of the City Ordinances
Regarding Animals. Voting in favor: Ma�,, Nyquist, CounciliTitembers Scott, Hawes,
and Theis. Voting aqziinst: The motion passed. Councilmember Lhotka was
not at the Counci table for the vote.
Councilmember Lhotka returned to the table at 11:07 p.m.
The City Manager introduced An Ordinance Amending
Chapter 11 of the City Ordinances
Regarding Hours of Sale for Intoxicating Liquor and pointed. out that this ordinance
amendment provides for the expansion of hoiirs for S sale intoxicating liquors.
He added the ordinance is offered for a. first reading this evening and it is recommended
a public hearing on the ordinance he scheduled for 8:00 p.m. on September 13, 1982.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to
approve for first reading An Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 of the City Ordinances
Regarding Hours of Sale for Intoxicating Liquor, and to set the public hearing date
on the ordinance for 8:00 p.m. on September 13, 1982.
The City Manager introduced An Ord Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances
Regarding Property Description, and pointed out that the ordinance describes property
rezoned r
in the Bergstom. Planning Coo- mission Application and is offered for a first
reading this evening. He noted it is recommended a public hearing on the ordinance
he scheduled for 8:00 p.m. on September 13, 1982.
There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by.Councilmember Theis to
approve for first reading An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances
Regarding Property Description and to set the public hearing on the ordinance for
8:00 p.m. on September 13, 1982.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
REPORT ON FRANCE AND HIGHWAY 100 STUDY
The City Manager explained to Council members that a consultant doing a study on
the France and Highway 100 area may offer planning recommendations to the City Council
that may not be agreeable to the City Council. He added that there may be certain
preconceived notions about the area that would create a conflict with the consultant's
recommendation. He added that he does not recommend approaching the Joslyn Company
if the study is to be accomplished, in that, if this is done, the Company would have
a right to direct the study and that this would tend to de-value the objectivity
of the study.
Councilmember Scott stated she would like to see an economic study of the area done
and would not like to see a study similar to that which was done in the area before.
The City Manager stated he would return to the City Council with a specific proposal
regarding a study for the France and Highway 100 area.
8-9 -82 -17-
The C-i-ty Council Cont4nucd t disca— -; the pos.-,ibilit.y of a study for the T'rance
i,indl Hiqlhw.: -y 10() area an(l The, , Js what speclific areas a study
would address. The C. t , Ianaq(4,r cxj d that there wouli be a planning analysis
study of "'Tie a tr ate! . SLI,.o.y, a study of t1je a'l oin lEnid, uses, a study of
the an rt kct s ud
f- Disuu.ssi,on
J pAlut.ion in tho. r ea,
conti-rue(J) among CoLrici-
regaird'ing the af llighway 100 study. The
CJA-y Managor stat v-l staff i Cart aruturn to Lhe Clitv Cotir-cil with. more information,
j- ir frola the surroun(3j, nei - - -
gllllc l Dnd po-inted out that the staff
would also J the staging of any prc)l- rro ject,
. J
'W OF
1.983 SliflivillRY F'OR °i I: SUBUPBS ( COMIMUNII=IONS COMJVITSSION
C
The Ci-ty Manager e>,plai - ned t the 1 buc'J is a ten'taV-3.ve document and is
submitted to the City Council for review. He explained 'hat any Council members
wishing to comment on the docwv�fi-nt can relay their comments to either himself or
Councilmember Scott.
The City Manager brought tip another item of business and explained to the Council
that the application form sent out to businesses with amusement devices include
fees for "kiddie rides ". He stated that the staff is recommending that the Council
consider a separate fee for these types of rides, different from the amusement
device for which they are currently under. He stated the staff will return to the
City Council with an aniendinent. Councilmember Lhatka requested information on
standards for carnival rides. The City Manager stated he believed the City of
Shakopee has such an ordinance and that he would assemble this information.
ADJOURJ\JNl2E
There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Council):ertiber Scott to
adjourn the meeting. Voti-ng in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhot Scott,
Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. The Drooki*
Center City Council adjourned at 11:50 p.m.
Clerk Mayor
8-9-82 -18-
^�
Wi re-
Is ►e 1;4esI T�4 7" 7�h / e1"( e oiv
ce�e N'AJG heX y9PP Oc4 TTIodv : A ?.z
b eel COQ lr� e flzzl F/P e7'OKY Re
C 6 ti N
we D
1
,OOT, a 7`)l AJ y a
SlAj ev� �z
aAk Y�
TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
FROM: Jim Grube, Assistant City Engineer 9�*-
DATE: September 9, 1982
RE: Subdivision Bond Release
Rudenick -Maahs Addition (Located Along 69th Avenue East of Oliver Avenue)
A performance bond, issued by United Fire and Casualty Company on August 28,
1981, was provided on behalf of Lawrence and Myrtle Rudenick as a guarantee
for improvements to Rudenick -Maahs Addition.
The bond, in the amount of $13,800.00, provided for extension of utility
services and construction of a turn around (to the satisfaction of Hennepin,
County) to eliminate backing of vehicles onto 69th Avenue. The utility
extensions have been completed to the satisfaction of the istaff and the turn
around was completed to the satisfaction of Hennepin County Public Works
Division under Street Entrance Permit No. 2259. Therefore, it is recommended
that the City Council release its interest in the bond as requested by the
Developer.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection
FROM: Gary Shallcross, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: Performance Guarantees
DATE: September 8, 1982
The following performance guarantees are recommended for release
or reduction as specified:
1. Twin Lake North Apartments
4582 -58th Avenue North
Planning Commission Application No. 80045
Amount of Guarantee - $5,000.00 bond
Obligor Gittleman Corporation
Curbing and sod work have been satisfactorily
completed around new parking lot. Recommend
total release.
2. Brookdale Pontiac
6801 Brooklyn Boulevard
Planning Commission Application No. 81015_
Amount of Guarantee - $12,000.00 bond
Obligor - R. L. Brookdale Motors
All curbing and landscaping have been installed
according to plan. Two trees adjacent to westerly
entrance on 68th Avenue North which had died have
been replaced and are healthy. Recommend total release.
3. McDonald's
5525 Xerxes Avenue North
Planning Commission Application No. 82014
Amount of Guarantee - $12,000.00 board
Obligor - McDonald's
Median--and retaining wall have been installed.
Parking lot has been regraded and resurfaced.
Signs are properly installed and one access has
been closed as per approved plans. Recommend
total release.
4. K -Mart
3600 -63rd Avenue North
Planning Commission Application No. 80038
Amount of Guarantee - $85,000.00 bond
Obligor K -Mart Corporation
All improvements have been installed according to the
approved plans. Landscaping has been completed within
last month. Recommend reducing bond from $85,000.00 to
$15,000.00 to insure viability of plantings until next
Spring.
Approved by
Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection
r.
TO: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
0
FROM: Jim Grube, Assistant City Engineer
DATE: September 9, 1982
RE: Final Plat of Evergreen Estates Located Between 69th and 70th Avenues
East of Dupont Application Number 82032)
ont Avenue (Planning pp
p � 9 Commissio
Hussman Investment Company has petitioned the City for approval of the referenced
final plat. The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council at i August
30, 1982 meeting subject to the following conditions:
1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.
2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances.
3. Homeowners. Association documents shall be subject to review and approval by
the City Attorney prior to final plat approval. _
The final plat appears to be in order, and the Homeowners Association documents
have been forwarded to the City Attorney for review. In addition, the City
Attorney is in the process of reviewing the Abstract of Title for the subject
property, and he has informed the staff of his findings at the September 13,
1982 City Council meeting.
In the absence of a formal report from the City Attorney at this time, it is
recommended the City Council approve the plat subject to.the following conditions
and direct the staff to take necessary action to insure that the platting process
is completed in conformance with the applicable City Ordinances.
1. Review and approval of the Homeowners Association documents by the City
Attorney.
2< Review and approval of an up Abstract of Title by the City_ Attorneys
SK:jn .
wn AVE. N.
-� Fl I I I I I i
a ; GIRARD AVE K 1
0) -�
y
<
n FREMON7 AVE. 7N x —
cr, i
m
p EMERSON AVE. N
� Z
DUPONT ��. n AVE. N.
COLFAY 1 s m Zp - (
� f
1H
�_ °� v -1
m 0 0 m -
j �r
z ' ALDRICH CT. z
BRYAN? Y� m
r
(n m 2 ALD KM
ALDRICH o �C� r1 n� A � ��(��X rn m
o Yx z /�Y z --
m _
_ m < x x �,
L - -- - D ,
CAFADEN =� =_� _ o� m \<ti . -. Axkkk
D IM m
- I
ANNEX &
m m O WATER
15T UV , cn m TREATMENT
Z FLANT
NEW_ TRUNK HI NWAY_ 25
N A E D LLAS
Ak ROA6
0
WIIL _ I 1
RIVERDALE -
- q E• _TT
- -� -t
NAM ISLAND
)F BROOKLYN PARK
L I
to 0
z
m �� A C >
n
EVERGREEN ESTATES c.R
LOT
^ Nnr /roe d AY ! ! .Auld I/ Nt M>} r/'Me L 1� d mo st* * riles` d Jtt. tJ, 7Nf. RlA
ge Aw of 0049 aw Me [w &. a! Ow wu/ Ls ,. Ma of Jt ai • Jar. J /iir•.r"u I"
�(
— -- -- -- - --tzoo-- -sJ.00
�"' W - iN a / �✓ wi - Ih a /•J7 %t'I/ 16 SI 36
�� : �� q00 �` ROa X1 .A a M
t 1 _ y
I
a a
Z e N / •!!'/R'M , /I DO )9.00 I `t .$ '. '��✓ I
N /•.!y'ZS "W _tr► Aw .r 4f a taa I
Off Af me 'f
- "fi` L 1 l`[ul Awe O Me w4 a/ dof s! a/vru•N °j '' �� !o l y� of a/•!r/rw Y; � �.�
5 1 w• �� lroo %�A
A �n
! � M � ,�}�y1 � $ moo f ° � J` � � °o ° �i • ,'fi � \ o a ' I i
�, °°�� 3 `�� �'a. �► ' F. J[00 We �y„ I
C O it
Fi
s r• • y � ' OI ;
1 •� A q /� - 19J.!!a1 line a! Lc/ f/ --� -
{ - JA#t AN dl lot S/ c_ r S? /Si -
- -••std NI °lTtt'M � i pN�iJ
NMe _fir j �c•+N •�?,� !0!0
! tV� lilt of [d S0�/ I `rt
sr o d lat ! rM, R tJ 'fist ✓�l¢�V /n� e�
I
LOT 50
r
t
PROCLAMATION
DECLARING SEPTEMBER 17 THROUGH 23 AS CONSTITUTION WEEK
-- WHEREAS, September 17, 1981, marks the one hundred ninety - fourth anniversary of
the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of America by the
Constitutional convention; and
WHEREAS, To accord official recognition to this memorable anniversary, and to the
patriotic exercise that will form a noteworthy feature of the occasion,
seems fitting and proper; and
WHEREAS, Public Law No. 915 guarantees the issuing of a proclamation each year
by the President of the United States of America designating September
17, through September 23 as Constitution Week,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Dean Nyquist by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor
of the City of Brooklyn Center in the State of Minnesota do hereb_
proclaim the week of September 17 through 23 as Constitution Week,
-- - -- in the City of Brooklyn Center, and urge all_our. citizens to pay special
attention during that week to our Federal Constitution and the advantages
of American Citizenship.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of
the City to be affixed at September this 14th day in the year of our
Lord one thousand nine hundred and eighty -one and the Independence of
the United States of America, the two hundred and fifth.
Date Mayor
Seal
Attest
Clerk
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FOR DRINKING
FOUNTAIN INSTALLATION IN VARIOUS NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS (CONTRACT 1982 -F)
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project
No. 1982 -13, bids were received, opened, and tabulated by the City Clerk and
City Engineer, on the 2nd day of September, 1982. Said bids were as follows:
BIDDER BID AMOUNT
LeVahn Brothers, Inc. $ 29,173.50
0 & P Contracting, Inc. 31,795.00
Sullivan's services, Inc. 32,890.00
Widmer Brothers, Inc. 51,435.00
Erwin Montgomery Construction Company _ _ 57,455.00
WHEREAS, it appears that LeVahn Brothers, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota
is the lowest responsible bidder.
C NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
g. Center, Minnesota:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to
enter into the attached contract, in the amount of $29,173.50 with
LeVahn Brothers, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota, in the name of
the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project No. 1982 -13
according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of th City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall
be retained until a contract has been signed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:
1. The estimated total cost of Improvement Project No. 1982 - 13 is °-
hereby amended according to the following schedule:
As Ordered As Bid
Contract $ 17,000.00 $ 29,173.50
Engineering 1,530.00 2,625.62
Administrative 170.00 291.74
? TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 18,700.00 $ 32,090.86
RESOLUTION NO.
2. An additional $18,090.86 be appropriated from the Capital Projects
Fund to provide necessary financing for the project.
3. The estimated costs will be financed as follows:
Capital Projects Fund (Division 88) $32,090.86
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same.
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
f
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: September 9, 1982
RE: Evaluation of Bids Received for Contract 1982 -F
Pursuant to City Council authorization, bids were received and opened on September 2,
1982, for installation of drinking fountains in various neighborhood parks in
the City. Upon review of the proposals, it has been determined that the lowest
responsible bid was submitted by LeVahn Brothers, Inc.
It is noted that the low bid ($29,173.50) for this project is substantially
greater than the estimated contract cost ($17,000).
The reasons for this increase include:
1. the original estimate was made in 1979.
2. the design of the installation has been upgraded to include installation of
-
a concrete pad around each fountain to prevent erosion, and to include
Installation of a drainage field.
3. two of the sites require dewatering to allow connection to be made to the
water main.
It is now our opinion that the low bid represents a fair value for this work.
It is also noted that adequate funds are available within the Park Bond Issue
to pay for these improvements.' __
LeVahn Brothers, Inc. has worked reviousl on similar projects for the park
p Y
boards of Minneapolis, Brooklyn Park, Robbinsdale, and Crystal. The Brooklyn
Center staff has had extensive contact with the firm on.various other projects;
therefore, the staff recommends the submitted proposal be accepted and a contract
be awarded to LeVahn Brothers, Inc.
Respectfully submitted,
Sy Knapp
SK: jn
Member introduced the following resolution and �� 6
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FOR PAINTING
OF 1.5 MILLION GALLON ELEVATED STORAGE TANK (CONTRACT 1982 -G)
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertsiement for bids for Improvement Project
No. 1982 -15, bids were received, opened, and tabulated by the City Clerk and
City Engineer, on the 2nd day of September, 1982. Said bids were as follows:
BIDDER BID AMOUNT
Dairyland Improvement Company, Inc. $ 38,300.00
Allied Painting and Renovating, Inc. 42,000.00
Ford Tank and Painting Company, Inc. 47,280.00
Odland Protective Coatings, Inc. 52,120.00
Schumann Brothers, Inc. 56,300.00
Abhe and Svoboda, Inc. 61,150.00
Tenyer Coatings, Inc. 76,000.00
f WHEREAS, it appears that Dairyland Improvement Company, Inc. of Madison,
d Wisconsin, is the lowest responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to provide specialized inspection services
not available through the City's Engineering Division to insure the completion
com
- g Y 5 g P
of the project in accordance with the specifications
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota:
1. The Mayor and City are hereby authorized and directed to
enter into the attached contract, in the amount of $38,300.00 with
Dairyland Improvement Canpany, Inc. of Madison, Wisconsin, in the
name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project No
1982 -15 according to the specifications therefor approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
20 The City Clerk is hereby authorized and _directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposit of the successful bidder and next lowest bidder shall _
be retained until a contract has been signed
3. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to enter into
an agreement with Twin City Testing and Engineering Laboratory,
Inc. to provide inspection services necessary to insure the
satisfactory completion of said Improvement Project No. 1982 -15
in accordance with said project specifications. The estimated cost
of said services is $3,200.00.
t
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:
t
1. The estimated total cost of Improvement Project No. 1982 -15 is
hereby amended according to the following schedule:
As Ordered As Bid
Contract $ 46,600.00 $ 38,300.00
Engineering 4,200.00 6,647.00
Administrative 470.00 383.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 51,270.00 $ 45,330.00
2. The estimated costs will be financed as follows-
Public Utilities Fund $45,330.00
Date Mayor
fi
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following-
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted:
s
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works .
DATE: September 9, 1982
RE: Evaluation of Bids Received for Contract 1982 -G
Pursuant to City Council authorization, bids were received and opened on September
2, 1982, for repainting of the 1.5 million gallon elevated tank located along
T.H. 100 adjacent to the Brookdale Center. Upon review of the proposals, it
has been determined that the lowest responsible bid was submitted by Dairyland
Improvement Company, Inc.
Summary of References
The staff has interviewed four references regarding the Contractor's ability to
performed the work. A brief summary of the interviews follows:
1. State of Wisconsin (John Freeman, P.E. 608- 266 - 1431),
The Contractor repainted the intereior of a 1/4 million gallon elevated
tank at the Veterans' Home in King, Wisconsin, in 1981. The Contractor
.did acceptable work with minimal inspection provided by the State.
Recommendation Accept proposal of Dairyland Improvement Company, Inc.
- 2. City of Madison, Wisconsin (James Blotz, P.E. 608266- 4641)
The Contractor painted a 4.2 million gallon ground storage tank in
1977 and is completing the painting-of a 3- million gallon ground storage
tank at the present time. All work has been subject to extensive on -site
inspection, and the work has been acceptable to date. The City would not
hesitate to hire the Contractor in the future.
Recommendation - Accept proposal of Dairyland Improvement Company,, Inc.
3. City of Ashwaubinon, Wisconsin (Mike LeFebre, P.E. of Foth & Van Dyke Engineering
414- 497 -2500)
The Contractor painted a 1 million gallon standpipe in 1977 and did
acceptable work while provid3d with extensive on -site inspection.
Recommendation - Accept proposal of Dairyland Improvement Company, Inc.
4. City of Eldora, Iowa (Harold Jensen, P.E. of Jensen, Cary and Shoff
319 -277 - 1022)
The Contractor recently completed the repainting of a 1/2 million gallon
elevated tank (inside and outside) for the City of Eldora, Iowa. The
consultant reported that the Contractor did an acceptable job, completing
the work without any difficulty, and under a minimum of supervision.
Recommendation - Accept proposal of Dairyland Improvement Company, Inc.
t
September 9, 1982 memo to G.G. Splinter
Page 2
Based upon the references provided, it is recommended the City Council accept
the proposal of Dairyland Improvement Company, Inc. for the repainting of the
elevated storage tank. The staff also recommends that the City Council authorize
the City Manager to secure the services of Twin City Testing and Engineering
Laboratory, Inc. for purposes of on -site inspection. Said services are highly
specialized in nature, and the staff does not have the expertise to do the work.
Therefore, use of the consulting firm on an extensive, though no continous,
basis is proposed (City forces will also monitor the work). The estimated cost
of providing such service is $3,200.00.
The attached resolution provides for acceptance of both the Contractor's proposal
I I I .
for panting and the consultant' s proposal for inspection services.
Respectfully submitted,
r�
Sy Knapp
SK: jn
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FOR CONTRACT
1982 - K (FUEL DISPENSING CONTROL SYSTEM)
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project
No. 1982 -23, bids were received, opened, and tabulated by the City Clerk and City
Engineer, on the 12th day of August, 1982. Said bids were as follows:
Base Bid Extended
Bidder Amount Service Contract
Northwest Service Station Equipment Co. $12,698.00 $3,000.00
Pump and Meter Service, Inc. 13,259.00 5,288.00
Zahl Equipment Company 14,378.00 125.00/
month for 1st year
15% increase for
years 2, 3, & 4
Rusco- Electronic Systems 19,002.00 1,233.00
for year 1
2% over C.P.I. for
years 2, 3, & 4
Honeywell Protection Services Division 37,478.00 17,989.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Northwest Service Station Equipment Com Company
y
of- Minneapolis, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter -
into the attached contract, in the amount of $12,698.00, with
Northwest Service Station Equipment Company of Minneapolis, Minnesota
in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project
No. 1982 -23 according to the specifications therefor approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2.. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposit of the successful bidde rand the next lowest bidder shall be
retained until a contract has been signed.
F
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
�y
c
RESOLUTION NO.
g ._
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly p g g Y seconded by
k
'J member' , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: September 9, 1982
RE: Fuel Dispensing Control System Improvement Project No. 1982 -23
The City took bids on the furnishing and installation of a Fuel Dispensing
Control System on August 19, 1982. The apparent low bid was submitted by
Northwest Service Station Equipment Company, the company currently servicing
our fuel dispensing operation. The major features of the system offered by
Northwest include:
- 24 hour unattended accessibility
security system activated by personal and vehicle "key cards"
electrical and battery operated memory system for times of power
failure
capability to monitor simultaneous pumping operations
Summary Of References
The staff has interviewed two references regarding performance of equipment
proposed for the Brooklyn Center fuel dispensing control operation. A brief
summary of the interviews follows:
1. Iowa State University (Ron Kenyon 515- 294 -1135)
- Iowa State brought the system on -line in April, 1982, and experienced
minor start up problems that were promptly corrected by replacement of
defective equipment. The system currently operates to the expectations
of the university officials without complications.
Recommendation Accept the bid and install proposed hardware
20. J & R Oil of Titonka, Iowa (Roger Wubben 515-928-:-
J & R Oil began investigation of the various systems in 1981 and chose
the system in June, 1982 and expanded it in July, 1982 for control of
additional locations. Mr. Wubben reports only minor start up problems
and now considers the system to be exceptional.
Recommendation - Accept bid and install hardware
Summary
Based upon interviews with the listed references, it is recommended the system
proposed by Northwest Service Station Equipment Company be accepted by the City
Council. Further review of the submitted proposal has resulted in the determination
that a four year extended labor contract is not warranted; therefore, it is
recommended the proposal for the extended labor contract be rejected.
e
September 9, 1982 memo to G.G. Splinter
Page 2
The result of such actions provides for the installation of a system with a two
year parts guarantee and one year labor guarantee, at a cost of $12,698.00. The
1982 budget for the Vehicle Maintenance Division provides $14,000 for this purpose.
Respectfully submitted,
Sy Knapp
SK:jn
e
i
Member introduced the following resolution and 101
moved its adoption: t
RESOLUTION NO.
t RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT 1982 -3
(LIONS PARK TRAILWAY IMPROVEMENT, CENTRAL PARK /GARDEN CITY
PARK TRAIL EXTENSION IMPROVEMENT, LIONS PARK TENNIS COURT
IMPROVEMENT, CIVIC CENTER ACCESS IMPROVEMENT, AND CIVIC
CENTER PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT)
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project
No. 1982 -18, 1982 -19, 1982 -20, 1982 -21, and 1982 -22, bids were received, opened,
and tabulated by the City Clerk and City Engineer, on the 9th day of September,
1982.
Bidder Bid Amount
C.S. McCrossan, Inc $222,903.75*
Park Construction Company, Inc. $238,837.00*
*Engineer's Correction upon unit extension
WHEREAS, it appears that C.S. McCrossan, Inc. of Osseo, Minnesota, is
the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized
and directed to enter into the attached contract, in the amount of $222,903.75,
with C.S. McCrossan, Inc. of Osseo, Minnesota in the name of the City of Brooklyn
Center, for Improvement Project Nos. 1982-18, 1982 -19, 1982 -20, 1982 -21, and
1982 -22 according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City
Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:
1. The estimated total cost of Improvement Projects 1982 -18, 1982 -19,
1982 -20, 1982 -21 and 1982 -22 is amended.according to the following
schedule:
LIONS PARK WEST TRAILWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -18
As Ordered As Bid
Contract $ 30,970.00 $ 22,857.50
Engineering 2,790.00 2,057.18
- Administrative - 310.00 228.57
TOTAL $34,070.00 $ 25,143.25
t
RESOLUTION NO.
r
- CENTRAL PARK /GARDEN CITY TRAILWAY EXTENSION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -19
As Ordered As Bid
Contract $ 59,090.00 $ 50,807.50
Engineering 5,320.00 4,572.68
Administrative 590.00 508.07
TOTAL $ 65,000.00 $ 55,888.25
LIONS PARK TENNIS COURT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -20
As Ordered As Bid
Contract $ 19,800.00 $ 28,985.50
Engineering 1,780.00 2,608.70
Administrative 200.00 289.85
TOTAL $ 21,780.00 $ 31,884.05
CIVIC CENTER ACCESS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -21
As Ordered As Bid
Contract $ 59,250.00 $ 70,117.50
_ Engineering 5,330.00 6,310.58
Administrative 590.00 701.17
TOTAL $ 65 $ 77,129.25
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -22
As Ordered As Bid
Contract $ 39,540.00 $ 50,135.75
Engineering 3,560.00 4,512.22
Administrative 400.00 501.36
TOTAL $ 43,500.00 $ 55,149.33
2. The estimated costs will be financed by appropriations from the
various funds as listed below.
LIONS PARK WEST TRAILWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -18
Capital Projects Fund (Division No. 89) $ 25,143.25
RESOLUTION NO.
CENTRAL PARK/GARDEN CITY TRAILWAY EXTENSION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -19
t .
Capital Projects Fund (Division Noe 49) $ 48,040.00
Capital Projects Fund (Division No. 56) $ 3,300.00
Capital Projects Fund (Division No. 97) $ 4,548.25
TOTAL $ 55,888.25
LIONS PARK TENNIS COURT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -20
Capital Projects Fund (Division No. 88) $ 31,884.05
CIVIC CENTER ACCESS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -21
General Fund Budget (Division No. 19) $ 5 1 000.00
Capital Projects Fund (Division No. 57) $ 72,129.25
TOTAL $ 77,129:
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -22
General Fund Budget (Division No <.19) $ 43,500.00
Capital Projects Fund (Division No. 57) $ 11,649.33
TOTAL $.55,149.33
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon.the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.'
r
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: September 10, 1982
RE: Evaluation of Bids Received for Contract 1982 -J
Pursuant to City Council authorization, bids were received and opened on September
9, 1982, for construction of trails in Lions Park West and Central Park /Garden
City, subgrade correction for the Lions Park Tennis Court, and improvements to
the north access to the Civic Center and both parking lots of the Civic Center/
City Hall complex. Upon review of the proposals, it has been determined that
the lowest responsible bid was submitted by C.S. McCrossan, Inc.
It is noted that the low bid ($222,903.75) for the projects is approximately 7%
f projects 208
650.00 as greater than the sumo the prod c ($ ), reported to the City Council P
during previous consideration of the various improvements.
The bid documents provide for deletion of various projects, if, in the City Council's
opinion, their ommission is in the best interests of the City. Excerpts from
the pertinent sections of the bid documents are provided for your review and
consideration.
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS - SECTION 15. AWARD OF CONTRACT
D. "The Owner reserves the right to delete any of the project(s) comprising the
Contract and award the remaining project(s) to the lowest responsible_ Bidder
for the project (s) as may best serve the interests of the Owner."
GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT= - SECT 3. PROPOSALS, BONDS AND GUARANTEES
A. ".... The Owner reserves - the right to accept any part or parts of the proposals
made at the prices included i-n -same, to waive any informalities, in proposals,
and to reject any or all bids."
However, upon examination of the bid total, on a project by project basis as
that the City Council accept the bid
described below, it is my recommendation y
of C.S. McCrossan, Inc. for all work comprehended and provide for reallocation
of funds from the various fund sources available as outlined below.
EXAMINATION OF BID
1. Lions Park West Trailway Improvement Project No. 1982 -18
DESCRIPTION: Installation of 8 bridge over Shingle Creek and construction
of woodchip trail in Lions Park, West
Estimated Construction Cost: $30,970.00
Contract Cost as Bid $22,857.50
Net Difference $ 8,112.50
DISCUSSION: The $8,112.50 difference in estimated costs and bid prices is
a result of an overestimation of bid prices. It is recommended
this project bid be accepted.
FUND SOURCE: Shingle Creek Trailway II Grant-(Capital-Project Fund Division
97) consisting of LAWCON (50 %), LCMR (40 %), and City (10 %) funds
September 10, 1982 memo to G.G. Splinter
Page 2
2. Central Park /Garden City Trailway Extension Improvement Project No. 1982 -19
DESCRIPTION: Installation of 8'x100' bridge over Shingle Creek, construction
of bituminous trail extension, and completion of exercise trail
and stations,
Estimated Construction Cost: $59,090.00
Contract Cost as Bid: $50,807.50
Net Difference $ 8,282.50
DISCUSSION: The $8,282. -50 difference in estimated costs and bid prices is
a result of an overestimation of bid prices. It is recommended
the project bid be accepted.
FUND SOURCE: Central Park /Garden City Trail Grant (Capital Projects Fund
Division 49) consisting of LAWCON (50 %), LCMR (40 %), and City_
(10 %) funds; Central Park III Fund (Capital Projects Fund
Division 56) consisting of City funds; and Shingle Creek Trailway
I Grant (- Capital Projects Fund Division 97) consisting of City -
funds
3. Lions Park Tennis Court Improvement Project No. 1982 -20
DESCRIPTION: Subgrade correction for future tennis court construction
Estimated Construction Cost: $19,800.00
Contract Cost as Bid: $28,985.50
Net difference ($ 9,185.50)
DISCUSSION: The $9,185.50 increase over theestimated_contract cost is a
result of an underestimation of bid prices. Our initial estimate
submitted to-the-City Council pr- ojected a -soil correction- cost
of $30,000.00 based upon cost estimates for a single project
bid letting.- -It was anticipated that' the trrc- lusion of this
project with the other projects would result in a significant
cost reduction, - however, such was the case.
From an engineering standpoints subgrade correction is necessary
to provide a- stable durable court surface. To provide the
maximum opportunity for stabilization of the new fill, the soil
correction should - be accompli-shedr this fall -, to allow construction
- of the court next summer on- a:_st:abi_l ized base. -
FUND SOURCE: Neighborhood Park Fund (Capital Projects Fund Division 88);
consisting of Park Bond proceeds ($25,000.00 budgeted for,
tennis court construction in 1982; allocate balance necessary
to complete project)
ti
September 10, 1982 memo to G.G. Splinter
Page 3
4. Civic Center Access Improvement Project No. 1982 -21 -
DESCRIPTION: Completion of permanent construction at north access to
Civic Center and front plaza
Estimated Construction Cost: $59,250.00
Contract Cost as Bid: 1 $70,117.50
Net difference ($10,867.50)
DISCUSSION: The $10,867.50 increase over the estimated contract cost is a
result of increased project scope whereby it was determined
necessary to provide a sidewalk along the entrance to the Civic
Center between the drive to the north parking lot and plaza.
This connection, - -not previously envisioned in the development
plan of the complex, provides direct, unobstructed access to
the upper plaza and City Offices for the handicapped, whereas
existing conditions make it necessary to enter the building at
the lower level and use the elevator. The resultant cost increase
due to sidewalk and retaining wall construction is $9,370.00.
The balance of the cost increases for this project are due to
a general underestimation of bid prices. It is recommended the
increased project scope be considered essential to the completion...
of the access to the Civic Center /City Hall complex, and the
project bid be accepted.
FUND SOURCE: $85,000.00 was initially requested for the completion of the
entrance in our 1982 budget request for the Government Buildings
Division. The adopted 1982 budget indicated that this item__
would be.considered in the Capital Projects Fund.
5. Civic Center Parking Lot Improvement Project No. 1982 -22
DESCRIPTION: Bituminous overlay of "old" portion of south parking lot, seal
coating of north parking lot, and_ - installation of bumper posts.....''..
in both parking lots.
Estimated Construction Cost: $39,540.00 _
Contract Cost As Bid: $50,135.75
Net difference ($10,595.75)
DISCUSSION: Upon closer examination of the quantities comprised in the
development of cost estimates and contract quantities for improve -
ment of the north lot, it was discovered that the staff neglected
to include the cost of bumper post installation in the Engineer's
Report. This work was included for the bidding process,
in a cost increase of $7,670.00. Due to an underestimation in
bid prices, the work necessary to provide proper drainage of the
south parking lot will cost $2,930.00 over the estimated cost
reported to the City Council.
t
September 10, 1982 memo to G.G. Splinter
Page 4
FUND SOURCE: The 1982 Budget for Government Buildings Division of the General
Fund provides $43,500.00 for improvement of the parking lots.
It is recommended that the additional funds required be appro-
priated from the Capital Projects Fund.
SUMMARY
As noted in the opening comments the reallocation of funds from the various fund
sources outlined above will provide an opportunity for completion of the projects.
Reconsideration of the projects for the purpose of rebidding the work in 1983
may not result in lower prices, nor will it guarantee the availability of contractors
with equipment and manpower necessary to complete the many and varied tasks com-
prehended under the contract._ With this in mind, it is recommended the City Council
accept the bid proposal of C.S. McCrossan, Inc. in accordance with the attached
resolution.
Respectfully submitted,
Sy Knapp
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO..
1982 -26, ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (CONTRACT
1982 -N)
WHEREAS, the City Council has received a report from the City Engineer _
regarding the feasibility of replacement of the sanitary sewer lift station located
on West Palmer Lake Drive at Urban Avenue at an estimated cost of $65,270.00; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it necessary and in the best interests
of the City of Brooklyn Center to canplete said lift station improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The following project is established in order to provide for `said-
improvement:
LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -26
2. The City Engineer's report is hereby accepted.
3.. The plans and specifications for Contract 1982 -N for said
Improvement Project prepared by the 'City Engineer are hereby
approved and ordered filed with the City Clerk.
4. The City Clerk shall prepare and casue to be inserted at least
twice in the official newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin
an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement
under such approved plans and specificaitons. The advertisement
shall appear not less than seven _(71.._days prior to the date
for receipt of bids, and specify the work to be done, state
that said bids will be received by the, City Clerk until 11:00—
.
A.M. on October 14, 1982, at which time they will be publicly
opened in the Council Chambers at City-Hall by the City Clerk and
City Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be considered by
the City Council at 7:00 P.M. on October 25, 1982, in the Council
Chambers, and-that no bids will.be__considered unless sealed
and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit,
- cashier's check; bid bond, or certified check payable to the .
City for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid.
5. The accounting for Improvement Project No. 1982 -26 shall. be done
in the Public Utilities Fund:
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
t
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
- whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
s
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: September 9, 1982
RE: Replacement of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. 3 located on West Palmer
Lake Drive at Urban Avenue
Lift Station #3 has developed a leak in the wall between the two sewage receivers.
This is an air ejector lift station which uses compressed air to force sewage
from a receiving basin through a force main to a discharge manhole at a higher
elevation. With a hole between the two basins, they must be energized together.
This causes a loss of efficiency, backs up the sewage at the receiving manhole
(as both receivers close off flow together) and allows for no emergency backup
(with only one tank working).
History of Existing Station
This lift station was constructed in 1957
In 1975, the City's Engineering staff did a thorough review of electrical consump-
tion records and determined that lift station #3 contributed 13.7% of the total
electrical cost while providing 2% of the total lift - station- system pumping
capacity. It was estimated that because of inefficiency, the City realized
losses (due to electrical costs -) of $400,00 per year.- At the same time, mainten-
ance costs on lift station #3 accounted for approximately 33% of the entire lift
station maintenance expenditures between 1968 and 197
Based upon the above conditions three improvement options were proposed in 1975:
P P p P
(1) Minor repair providing replacement of worn and obsolete parts; (2) Major
repair providing for the rebuilding of the air ejector system; (3) Total station
replacement. Bids were received for replacement of'the station, and they exceeded
the Engineer's estimate by approximately 50% ($12,600 greater than the $25,730
estimate). The bids were rejected and lift station repair was completed by
City forces.
Since then - the station has operated until now without However,
the electrical costs remain high and the station has required frequent repairs
of its mechanical system.
Evaluation of Current Options
O-ur staff has conducted a detailed review of various restoration /replacement
options. A brief summary of these options follows
OPTION NO. 1 REPAIR OF LEAK IN WALL
This option is really not feasible because the physical size and shape of the
two basins, and the restricted access available to the basins make it impossible
to repair the leak on a permanent basis. Even if repair were possible, it must
be realized that the entire station is 25 years old and that we have had a history
of high electrical and maintenance costs.
Also, this lift station consists of a steel shell which was installed in an area -
where some of the soils are highly corrosive. While cathodic protection was
incorporated into the original construction, we cannot accurately determine the
extent to which that protection is still effective, or the extent to which corro-
sion has occurred.
September 9, 1982 memo to G.G. Splinter.
Page 2
Accordingly, we recommend against further consideration of this option.
OPTION NO. 2 - RETROFITTING EXISTING STRUCTURE WITH NEW PUMPS AND CONTROLS
This option would provide for gutting of the air ejector system and retrofitting
the existing steel shell with submersible pumps and new controls, at an estimated
cost of $32,900.00.
This option is not recommended for the following reasons:
(1) we would still be using the 25 year old shell from the existing station,
with it's unknown life expectancy.
(2) the existing structure is too small to provide a large enough wet well for
efficient operation of the submersible pumps. As a result, the operating
costs would e g c
ld high and there would be considerable difficulty y in servicing
'the pumps and controls.
OPTION NO. 3 - MODIFY EXISTING STRUCTURE, AND INSTALL NEW PUMPS AND CONTROLS
This option contemplates more extensive remodeling of the existing structure by
removing the upper 13 feet of the steel shell and installation of a new steel
chamber to house new vacuum pumps and controls.
Interior renovation (i.e. reinforcement of corroded shell plate, necessary welding,
and protective coating installation ) would be necessary to insure continued
integrity of the existing structure, and additional cathodic protection-would be
provided.
The estimated total costs for this option are $61,600
While all possible steps are incorporated to prevent deterioration of the remain-
ing portion of the steel shell, we would still be taking a chance of failure of
that structure.
OPTION NO. 4 - REPLACE EXISTING STATION WITH NEW STATION_
This option provides for removal of the existing stet -ion and,construction of a
totally new station. Several alternate types of stations have been considered._
We recommend installation of-a•= precast concrete structure and installation of
submersible pumps. This design has been used very successfully by other cities
h been found nd to be ver
t 5 years. It as
as e Y efficient and easy to
during the p y
maintain. In addition, the use of a concrete structure assures longevity, while
the use of submersible pumps assure maximum flexibility for future pump replace-
ment.
The estimated cost for this option is $67,810. This includes provisions for a
quick- connect system to a portable generator (i.e. standby power) and for instal-
lation of a monitoring system.
September 9, 1982 memo to G.G. Splinter
Page 3
Recommendation
I recommend that we proceed with complete replacement of the existing station
as described in Option 4 above. Funds for this purpose are available from the
retained earnings of the Public Utilities Fund which are designated for plant
expansion.
Plas and specifications for a new station have been prepared by our staff. A
resolution for the purpose of establishing the project and approving plans and
specifications is submitted for consideration by the City ;Council.
Respectfully submitted,
Sy Knapp
SK:jn
f
74TH AV N 73RD LA.
I
I i
I I
1
I 1
I '
j PALMER LAKE ' CITY
I '
SCHOOL '
I
�.. �.
� E WO -401 40 -722 39-722 38-W.L.I �' ...
411 . wool) &,
WO-PI-0.5 WO- WO -PL. PLD -W.
41 -713 PL.O '
40- 1 Z 39 -72.1 38-721
721 � LANE
,;� 41 -712. _ -
7
i 72-P 2 NO W0. y WO -PLD.I
39 -72 LD5 T2_
40 -72 - O - 38 -72 .: 72,P CO.3 PLD. -721
VI -37Y 0 L E .��
f ;
�- L ° AV E N. X W EST\ /
VI - PLD.4 , C 2 - / PALMER' I
41 -711 ; VI -371 3 - T2 - pLO./ LAKE
Q 40 - w 39 -712 r v4P�a P L.OIR� �� PARK .
'712 > 38-711 LE q
4 41-71 -?1 Q 1 - - -
t 7I EW -DR. 9L O - y��y �\ t
40! 6 -UR5
-
N. 8S 40-711 39 -711 38- Z 1 36 UR4 VI-PLD.2
n J
40• 39-71 71 36- 'f. PL.D -�
70� I UR3 P VI -I
3fir Z - VI -PLD1 v _:
x 39 -693 j UR3
19
40 -701 38- Q W 36-UR2 O PL.D. -VI \
(Y) 693 > Y `�' ,
Z = Q
Q , W ' 37 -UR2 1 (v J,
PL.D.-UR2 * J r
_ 39- w _Z 3 (�
693 Q 38 -?� W 36- J .
40-70 IMPRO ��E -
x•41 =692 �. 1 69Z ,r W URI Q
_ 37- 0 0- PL.D. -URI =�
' W ' URI ' 197. t \.
CJ 38 -UR 36-U URz =`
39- Z �, 129 116 141 r U" PLD.
X41 -691 40 -691 691 Q O i r ,,
1 1
UR8p' uRgVE UR- ' N. rI L.S3 aL
- 3 61 : PI-13' E&
f
•41-69 UR -PL.D2 - MAIN
7 rn
i , -_ C3. 3 - 5 Q - i_ 17 -$ 69.361 36 -69 69-PL.D. r 4c AL
- __ 22 2 -i� ' O PL.D. - 2 726
£9TH 4 �ss - -42 N. s� ��s 4 +35
- AVE. - -
® 4 -69
zG -�g2 P.L.D.1 0 * S.C.P -304
38 -681 36- 1 -� 3 -69 89. �,;
WATER TOWER 3T -68! 681 MOUND li► 55 S 32 - 69
NO. I CEMETARY > O �' S. C.!
1 Q 34 -61x1 � I I J,
� 68TH ti 32- 681 10 �;o ®
3 6 -66 0 _ AVE cl 68TH 33 -6
36 -68 34 -68
8 `` I1 y
0 t - O
-3 I -4
dD
�E v
39 -672 W 32 -6
0329 -8 328-8
038-672
N. Q
c 37 -672 3 THUpS 6e -30 W t
a FREE WAY LL
39 -671 38 ,. PARK R0.
Vl� N 1.1 -s71 67TH AVE X�CX1St�Z 34 -67
TR --Ani
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CHLORINE ROOM /STORAGE ROOM IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1982 -27, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND
DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (CONTRACT 1982 -0)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
deems it necessary and in the best interests of the City to provide for suitable
storage of chlorine_ within an enclosed structure that meets all applicable codes;
and
-- _WHEREAS, the City Council considers it advantageous to provide additional
enclosed storage space for necessary janitorial and sanitation equipment in con-
- -- junction with construction of the chlorine room, all at an estimated total cost
of $29,000.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The following_ project is hereby established in order to provide
for said improvements:
CHLORINE ROOM /STORAGE ROOM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -27
2. The plans and specifications for Contract 1982 -0 for said Improvement
Project as prepared by Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Architects are approved
and ordered filed with the City Clerk.
3 The -City Clerk shall prepare and cause to °be inserted al least -
twice in the official newspaper an advertisement for bids upon
the making of such improvement under such approved plans and
- specifications. The advertisement — - all appear not less than seven
(7) days prior to the date for receipt of-bids, and specify the -work _.
to be done, state that said bids be received by the City Clerk
- until 11:00 A.M. on September 30,1982, at which time they will-be.-
publicly opened in the Council Chambers at City Hall by the City -
Clerk and City Engineer, will then be- tabulated and will be considered
by the City Council at 7:00 P.M. on October 4, 1982, in the Council
Chambers, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's
-- check, bid bond, or certified check payable .:to the City for five --
percent (S%) of the amount of such bid.
4. The accounting for Improvement - Project shall be done - --
in the General Fund Budget (Division Noe 19)e
_ Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: September 10, 1982
RE: Construction of Chlorine Room /Storage Room Enclosure For Civic Center
The 1982 Budget of the Government Buildings Division (Division No. 19) provides
$30,000.00 for the construction of a fully enclosed chlorine /storage /trash bin
addition to the existing equipment enclosure located west of the police entrance
to City Hall. The addition is necessary to provide for chlorine storage (used
in the swimming pool) that meets the existing health and building codes. In
addition, the improvement will provide a fully enclosed, secure structure
for purposes of storage of mowers, shovels, miscellaneous equipment and materials,
and the trash bin which are currently housed within the wooden shed located
directly adjacent to.the public entrance to the police department, thereby
allowing removal of the existing wooden enclosure.
It is estimated that the construction cost for providing the enclosed addition _
(which incorporates an exterior facia buck identical to the existing structure)
is $26,000.00. Architectural fees, to be paid to Lindberg Pierce, Inc., the
consultant for the project, have been estimated at $3,000.00. The resultant total
project cost is estimated at $29,000.00.
Respectfully submitted,
Sy Knapp
• ' F � I1'
I�� ��W 2" wle� Pt"�+ne• -•ctc /�•I e » e e, •�R,
t45j , IC-4
- .:::G 10� 3 WALL SGT IDI i
/
THIN ! bFrlo"j wt yT Wt-u. 7ot5 `b>• /
_ ~I E1`iJ71NG = Q�IPME — ENGLOSUhE .mot � / _
PROJECT 1 82 z
w
v \b W
0 Z
w
t • I U -
Qri L_. 1 G ✓5 Q Q
=
F' L-L w wo p
^"�G. , �1" RBI `ICS 3Co" t•ilGt'I �L.L/`Rb �. .
C!NTj t -8 !o'o, 5 _�. G ,�q 7 4 , ; .Je_4» I , v 0 M.O. r!.o. � , - -t`5iI G N' - 2* 1 ? - ;o �/�`�C. "HZ!
- ULL 1t 7-'0 /-rV7 OrY-G -- 17 - 4
GO�-NEtG 70 5 °r
F�Mo�°. :r•`;T!Nr, Cbt,t.P1`D \ •
T � GO DUIT� ?o N =w & \
i Utz n. rll / �!
POLICE DEPT.
PROPOSED
1983 BUDGET
RECAP,--
L-
TOTAL BUDGET
1983 PROPOSED _ _ $6,583,220
1982 ADOPTED _ _ _ _ $6,508,647
INCREASE _ _ _ _ _ _ $ 74,573
.INCREASE _- - - - - --1.15.%
{
NET OPERATING BUDGET
(TOTAL. BUDGET, LESS CAPITAL OUTLAY AND
DEBT RETIREMENT)
1983 PROPOSED.. _ _ $5,921,047
1982 ADOPTED _ _ _ _ $5,650,124
INCREASE _ _ _ _ _ _ $ 271,523
PERCENTAGE INCREASE... ...4.81%
. PROPOSED CAPITAL OUTLAY,
1983 PROPOSED - - - - $
1982 ADOPTED. _ _ _ _ $452,222
(DECREASE)__ _ _ _ _ ($162,490)
PERCENTAGE (DECREASE)(35.93 %)
DEBT RETIREMENT
1983 PROPOSED_ _ _ _ _$371,841
1982 ADOPTED _ _ _ _ _ $368,001
INCREASE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ $ 3,840
PERCENTAGE INCREASE _ _ 1.04%
PRO APPROPRIATIONS
GENERAL GOVERNMENT $1,017,739
PUBLIC SAFETY ® ®� ®1,849,852
PUBLIC WORKS _ _ ® 1,375,679
HEALTH & WELFARE _ _. _ 28,700
RECREATION _ ®® 1,231,078
UNALLOCATED ®_ 708,331
DEBT REDEMPTION 371,841
$6,583,220
APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNCTION
1983 PROPOSED CITY BUDGET
f
PUBLIC SAFETY °` e. to
PUBLIC WORKS j
20.9%
/ HEALTH AND WELFARE (. 4X)
5.6%
DEBT REDEMPTION
RECREATION (18.7X)
15.5% UNALLOCATED DEPT EXP 00. BX)
n GENERAL GOVERNMENT
1
f
r
APPROPRIATIONS BY OBJECT CLASSIFICATION
1983 PROPOSED CITY BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES (62.8X)
INSURANCE (IX)
COMMUNICATIONS (I.IX)
CONTINGENCY 0)
i
4.8X CAPTIAL OUTLAY (4.4X)
9%
5.6% PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
SUPPLIES. REPAIRS. MTC ALL OTHER (4.8X)
DEBT RETIREMENT (5.61) UTILITIES
ESTIMATED R
PROPERTY TAXES _ _ _ _ _ _ o _ $3,202,958
BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITS _ 121,089
NON- BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITS, �. 81,500
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE _ _ _ 1
GOVERNMENT CHARGES FOR SERVICES 65,780
PUBLIC SAFETY CHARGES FOR SERVICES 9,396
RECREATION FEES 4 _ _ o _ _ 468,533
FINES AND FORFEITS .� � �. 120,000
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE _ _ _ _ 656,329
$6,583,220
ESTIMATED SOURCES OF FINANCING
1983 PROPOSED CITY BUDGET
GENERAL PROPERTY TAX (48.70
COURT FINES (1.8X)
LICENSES 8 PERMITS (3.4)
6.8X
SURPLUS /PRIOR YEARS (3.2X)
28.2%
MISCELLANEOUS
INTERGOVERNMENT REV.
CHARGES FOR SERVICES (8.3X)
LOCAL GOVERNMENT, AIDS
1983 ESTIMATE _ _ _ $1,447,61.1
1982 ESTIMATED_ _ ... $1,447,611
INCREASE _ _ _ _ _ _ $ -0-
PERCENTAGE INCREASE _ _ -0-
i
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
1983 PROPOSED _ _ _ _ $251,432
1982 ADOPTED - - - $452,222
(DECREASE)- _ _ _ _ ($200,790)
PERCENTAGE (DECREASE),.. (44'.40 %)
PROPERTY TAX LEVY
1983 PROPOSED _ _ _ $3,202,958
1982 ADOPTED _ _ _ _ $2,965,702
INCREASE _ _ _ _ _ _ $ 237,256
PERCENTAGE INCREASE_ _ _ 8.0%
ASSESSABLE VALUATION
1983 ESTIMATED_ _ $198,927,405
1982 ACTUAL- _ _ $183,502,540 j
INCREASE _ _ _ _ _ $ 15,424,865
PERCENTAGE INCREASE _ _ 8.41 % II
MILL RATE
1983 PROPOSED ESTIMATE. 16. 101 MILLS
1982 ACTUAL � _ _ _ _ _ 16.162 MILLS j
(DECREASE) _ _ _ _ _ _ ( .061 MILLS)
PERCENTAGE (DECREASE)_._ _ (.38%)
PROPERTY TAX.
PROPOSED 1983 TAX ON $59,500. HOME . $79.80
1982 TAX ON $56,000 HOME . _ $73.45
_
INCREASE
PERCENTAGE INCREASE ® m _ 8.6%
DISTRIBUTION OF TAX DOLLAR COLLECTED
FROM OSSEO SCHOOL GIST. RES. IN 1982
Currently, there are ten taxing jurisdictions
for which the.County collects and distributes
r
taxes on property in Brooklyn Center. Each OSSEO SCHOOL NO. 279 (45X)
property tax dollar collected in 1982 from
a Brooklyn Center resident living in the
Osseo School District was distributed as
shown on this chart. /
�" •• , . VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS (2X)
1 MISCELLANEOUS (2X)
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT (31)
31% � r '
HENNEPIN COUNTY
r�
t
CITY OF BROOKLYN CTR (17X)
* (Metropolitan Council, Mosquito Control District, Park Museum; County Parks Bond Principal and Interest,
Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority)
.. I I M PACT
ED BUD GET TAX �ROPO�
1
1982 BUDGET 1 PROPOSED.DUDGET
1981 1982 1982 19$2 1983
MARKET TOTAL CITY MARKET CITY CITY TAX INCREASE
VALUE TAX TAX VALUE TAX DOLLARS PERCENT
148,600 $363.o6 $ 62.48 $51,000 $ 64.92 $ 2. 44 3.9%
$56,000 $429.16 $ 74.51 $59,500 $ 79.80 $ 5.29 7.17
$76 $9oo.64 $156.37 $80 $171.24 $14.8.7 9.5%
. o
MAJ CAPITAL OU TL A Y . I
SOUND SYSTEM FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS ..............o...... $ 2
CIVIC CENTER BOILER ELEMENT REPLACEMENT - ........ $ 5,900
9 �
REMODEL FIRE STATIONS......... ....•.o'...• «. ..• moo•• $ 30,
TABLES FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS. o.......•.........:..o. $ 2
4 POLICE SQUAD CARS ...... $ 40,600
SPARE AIR BOTTLES.FOR.FIRE DEPARTMENT.....•..........• $ 2
MOBILE RADIO FOR ENGINEERING VEHICLE ...............o.. $ 2
1 DUMP TRUCK FOR STREET MAINTENANCE................... $ 25,000
L
1 SIDEWALK PLOW FOR STREET MAINTENANCE ...........:.... $ 33,000
PAINT SWIMMING POOL CEILING ........................... $'.6,900
UPGRADE AIR TEMPERING UNITS SWIMMING POOL......... $ " 4,000
DISHWASHER AND HEATER FOR SOCIAL HALL.. o.. $ 2,600
NEW SHELTER ROOF FOR BELLVUE PARK.......... $ 10
RENOVATE SHELTER BUILDINGS AT KYLAWN AND FREEWAY...... $ 28,500
SATELLITE SCREENS AT VARIOUS PARKS .................... $ 6,000
MOBILE RADIOS FOR PARK VEHICLES... o.. ........ ... $ 3,600
T
B HIGHLIGHTS OTHER
*+►* NO NEW FULL —TIME POSITIONS PROPOSED -
* ** ASSESSOR POSITION ELIMINATED FROM 1982 ADOPTED EUDOET
* ** ONE CUSTODIAL POSITION ELIMINATED
** POLICE REORGANIZATION — TWO POSITIONS ELIMINATED
* ** TAX LEVY OF $25,904 FOR INCREASED FIRE DEPARTMENT PENSIONS
* ** ONE FULL —TIME EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEES TIME TO BE CHARGED TO
PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR SANITARY SEWER CLEANING
* ** ALL EMPLOYEE SALARIES FOR 1983 ARE NOT AS YET SETTLED
THEREFORE ALL EMPLOYEES SALARIES ARE BUDGETED AT 1982 RATES
** PROPOSE TO DISCONTINUE THE DETATCHED WORKER PROGRAM
* ** ELIMINATION OF SOME SKATING RINK WARMING HOUSES
j a
* *# COUNCIL CONTINGENCY APPROPRIATION OF $x30,000
0 r GERALD SPLINTE
R
CITY Ii%NAG R
BROOKLYN CLNTER
FROM -. RICHARD J. S H EI FER
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: SEPTEMBER 13 , 1982
R ; . oprTl ; P UM r', PT 'a7 b C Cr RC�I ICE REP ST_ T,A`T IVE
Al l vatte 5 labor relations are t ,o ."3, ( st'.LIssed between
the desigl - hated re resentativ(r -s ( t
Labor rela una b? - t\ -,T een a unioi, rep ;rest = ?nt - at ve an6i
the Cit Council t ' .£,?.ate f roi:. that principal and � �:G',, . L�.tl�e$ an
m
��wl�
unfair hc.r practice. ..,-r hcLat L,e� avFSi �,° _�
_ a
&t t the City Colancil,
t
such ca di ::sclass -i oti , xca t ?' R ..r Z` L 1 C- Lj a T t�7 in .i aL-" ')r whic
results in liability for the City, or it r , :ty �, -a-i e- .night to assert
an unfair labor practice against the union. T� i �1 -- bY,,t'i unions s have
been advised that management is willing to discus w th u; e f f-e-- is of the
proposed reorganization upon the officers either O ,
collectively, without waiving the principal that.
is are ._a h€ rent managerrient Prerocxative both under the statute a..nd sander the
contract, and the refore net a baraainable issu each discussions should,
however, take place between the designated representatives of labor and
management. iv ltlo-v
It is our recom=endatio , # i"ierut" re" , that 4 iscu.ss.io2`i of labor
rianagement matters such as seniority rights, for example not be pern -i t d
under any circumsances. Individual. officers, as citizens of Brooklyn
Center, certainly have a rigait to comment budgetary ratters. Such comments
should, however, not occur at open for ., but should occur at regularly
scheduled budget hearings where the public is invited to speak.
RJggdb
a
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL SERVICE GARAGE SITE IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT 1982 -28 AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, that:
1. a project to improve the Municipal Service Garage site (Tract A,
Registered Land Survey 1274) is hereby established. The proposed
project shall include construction of an unheated storage building,
installation of fencing as required to comply with zoning ordinance
requirements for screening, paving of the storage yard area,
construction of storage bins and security fencing, remodeling of the
shop /office and lockerroom /lunchroom areas of the existing garage
building, insulation of the exterior walls of the existing garage
building, replacement of existing windows with insulating glass and
installation of an equipment wash sack in the existing garage building.
The proposed project shall be designated as Project 1982 -28.
2. The estimated total cost for all proposed improvements, including
construction costs and architectural /engineering costs is $618,000.
The accounting for this project will be done in the Capital Projects
Fund.
3. There is hereby appropriated the sum of $370,800 (60% of the estimated
total costs) from the Public Utility Fund, and the sum of $247,200
(40% of the estimated total costs) from the Capital Projects Fund.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member - -and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and-adopted.
• e
A� °•+ Rf YO
_ O FLOOR
e
e . •Ili 77
� a 1 • � 1 1 1 1 1 • e �.+� �
.::a'`" we pr �b"" � E OD K IMA �l�A! ® AGGRE�AAgEAt�^c►E•
/ Z
SAL t
IrO pA
. ' • q Or r""'
!,Lit.01N6 rosto ! • .
S RO ti
/ !� 1lN• kpOEAtEO 0 ..... s
GUO
4 .e 0 ie
s ' l'.A : •. r Moll : ♦1:11111 lIJ%A Mlll✓
1 I NIL 1 f
rah
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL /ENGINEERING
WITH LINDBERG PIERCE INC. FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION
OF MUNICIPAL SERVICE GARAGE BUILDING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1982 -28
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, that the proposal submitted by Lindberg Pierce Inc. to provide
Architectural /Engineering Services for design and construction supervision of
the Municipal Service Garage Building as contemplated within Improvement Project
1982 -28, at a cost not to exceed $32,000 is hereby accepted. The Mayor and
City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into contract with
Lindberg Pierce Inc. for said services.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was - declared duly passed and adopted. '
R
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
t ' RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICE GARAGE SOIL
CORRECTIONS CONTRACT 1982 -P
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for
soil corrections in conjunction with the site improvements at the Municipal Service
Garage as contemplated within Improvement Project 1982 -28.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota:
1. The plans and specifications for the following improvement
as prepared by the City Engineer are approved and ordered filed
with the City Clerk:
MUNICIPAL SERVICE GARAGE SOIL CORRECTIONS
CONTRACT 1982 -P
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least
twice in the official newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin
an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement
I,- under such approved plans and specifications:_ The advertisement
shall appear not less than three (3) days prior to the date for
receipt of bids, and specify the work to be done, state that said
bids will be received by the City Clerk until 11:00 A.M. on October
14, 1982, at which time they will be publicly opened in the City
Council Chambers at City Hall by the City Clerk and City Engineer,
will then be tabulated and will be considered by the City Council
at 7:00 P.M. on October 25, 1982, in the Council Chambers, and
that no bids will be considered unless ;sealed and filed with the
City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check,
bid bond, or certified check payable to the -City for five (5)
percent of the amount of such bid.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted
. l �
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
C- RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS
ON OCTOBER 4, 1982
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 4th day of October, 1982, in the
City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon the proposed assessments for
the following charges:
Delinquent Weed Destruction Accounts
and Hazard Abatement Costs
at such time and place all persons owning property to be assessed
for such charges will be given an opportunity to be heard with
reference to such assessments.
.2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall
forthwith prepare assessment rolls. -for the above charges, and
shall keep them on file and open to inspection by any interested
persons.
3. The City Clerk is directed to cause .a notice of the hearing on the
proposed assessments to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing.
4. The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner
of each parcel described in such assessment rolls not less than two
weeks prior to the hearing.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was, duly seconded by
member and upon vote being taken thereon,-the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
MINUTES OF THE FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING PROPOSED USE HEARING
JULY 14, 1982
2:30 p.m.
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
The Director of Finance called to order the Federal Revenue Sharing Proposed Use
Hearing at 2:30 p.m. Present at the hearing were the Director of Finance Paul
Holmlund, and Administrative Assistant Tom Bublitz.
The Director of Finance explained the City of Brooklyn Center is holding a public
hearing to receive suggestions from the public on how to use 1983 Federal Revenue
Sharing Funds. He stated any individual or organization may testify orally or in
writing. He noted the City staff had not received any written comments regarding
the proposed use of federal revenue sharing funds. He stated the City expects to
receive approximately $153,507 in revenue sharing next year.
The Director of Finance briefly reviewed the City policy on the use of federal
revenue sharing funds pointing out the policy is to use the revenue sharing funds
for capital expenditures and for expenditures that do not create ongoing programs.
He stated there will be approximately $266,663 in federal revenue sharing funds
available for use by the City in 1983. He noted this amount is arrived at it,
by adding the remaining balance to revenue sharing funds to the amounts which will
be received for the second, third, and fourth quarters in entitlement period 14.
The Director of Finance held the public hearing open until 3:00 p.m. No one from
the public attended or spoke at the public hearing and the Director of Finance
adjourned the public hearing at 3 :00 p.m.
t /2 4'
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FOR COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Communications Equipment
authorized by the City Council on July 12, 1982, bids were received, opened, and
tabulated by the City Clerk on the 24th day of August, 1982. Said bids were as
follows:
Proposal A:
Bidder Bid Amount
Motorola, Inc. $94,856.75
General Electric $112,715.00
Proposal B:
Bidder Bid Amount
Motorola, Inc. $21,114.00
General Electric No Bid
WHEREAS, it appears that Motorola, Inc. of Minnetonka, Minnesota, is the
lowest responsible bidder:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota:
- 1e The -Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to,enter__ -_
into a contract in the amount of $115,9.70.75 with Motorola, Inc..of
Minnetonka, Minnesota in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center for
communications equipment according, to the plans and specifications.
therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of
the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and: directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be
retained until a contract has been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Jim Lindsay, Chief of Police
DATE: September 9, 1982
SUBJECT: Radio Communications Center Upgrade
We have now received all of the bids and quotations necessary
for determining the equipment needed for the radio communica-
tions center. Bid proposal A in Montgomery's report was
received with a low bid of $94,856.75. Motorola was the low
bidder. This proposal includes all the equipment in the
communications center itself; console, base station antennas,
et cetera. General Electric was second low bid with a cost
of $112,715.00.
Bids were received for proposal B of the Montgomery report
which Motorola was the only bidder with a cost of $21,114.00.
This item is for the togging recorder in-the radio room.
C. O. Field Company offered the lowest bid for the remodeling
of the communications center itself. This bid was in the
amount of $10,875.00.
Ward Montgomery, g y, representing the City-of-Brooklyn Center,
negotiated with General Electric an extension of a State of
Minnesota bid for portable radios. These costs amount to a
50% discount from their list price. This item includes all
of the portable radios, the extra radio, the battery charger,
,portable mikes and other accessories and amounts to
$20,060.00.
Ward Montgomery, again representing the City of Brooklyn Center:,
negotiated with Motorola for several items which would be
considered noncompetitive items. This means that the equipment -
has a technology that is only offered by one supplier. Included
in this would be all of our DVP equipment, meaning digital
voice privacy. There is no other manufacturer that has DVP.__
The DVP equipment includes a base station, two mobiles, five
portables and the necessary accessories :f:or -this equipment. In. ,. -
addition, Montgomery was able to negotiate for mobile radio
units which are placed in each squad car. These units also fall
under the noncompetitive items in that the technology in these
radios are not offered by other manufacturers at this time. This
technology is known as a synthesizer. This technology allows
.the radios to be programmed for up to 32 frequencies by a
changing of what is known as a "chip ". The cost of this chip
- .is $50.00 where frequencies in standard radios run as much as
Memo to Splinter
Page 2 °
September 9, 1982
$200.00 per radio frequency. Brooklyn Center intends to utilize
approximately 12 frequencies. The price negotiated by Montgomery
is an extention of a State of Minnesota bid that expired in
August of this year.
The following is a composite of the total bids and quotations
received by the City in reference to the radio communications
center upgrading.
Proposal A $ 94,856.75
Proposal B 21,114.00
Remodeling - 10,875.00
Portables & Asscessories - 20,060.00
Mobiles & DVP's 62,677.25 _ �-
TOTAL $209,583.00
a The estimated cost of - this__ upgrading was $225,000.00
• t
MOTOROLA, INC
Proposal "A
Two Way Radio Equipment
Date August 24, 1982
To: Mr. Brad Hoffman,
Purchasing Agent .
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
The undersigned, being familiar with the local conditions af-
fecting the work and with the Contract Documents, including
Advertisement for Bids, Proposal, Specifications, Explanation
of Bid Items, General Conditions and Addenda which govern the
purchase of material and labor and awarding of contract, here-
by proposes to do all the work and provide all the material
and equipment which pertains to improvements in the City of
Brooklyn enter Communications System provided i n the
for
• accompanying Specifications dated June 21, 1982, for the
following: °
BID ITEM 1A: (1) Police mobile relay station.
Five Thousand Six Hundred Twenty Dollars ($ 5,620 )
BID ITEM 2A: (lot) Installation for police mobile
relay station.
Eight Hundred Ninety - two Dollars ($ 892 )
BID ITEM 3A: (1) Police voting comparator
5C[/10-0
F
. Thousand. Three Hundred Fortvnine & Dollars ($ 1,349.50 )
BID ITEM 4A: (lot) Installation for police voting
comparator. _.
Four Hundred Eighteen Dollars ($ 418. )-
BID ITEM 5A: (1) Fire voting comparator.
Dollars Six Hundred Ninetv�Four
($ 694 )
BID ITEM 6A: (lot) Installation for fire voting
comparator.
Three Hundred Forty Two Dollars ($ .342 )
-Page 1 of 5
' e
Proposal eoAee e
BID ITEM 7A: (lot) Satellite receiver system for
Dayton's Department Store site.
Two Thousand Two Hundred Ninety Six Dollars ($ 2.296 }
BID ITEM 8A: (lot) Installation for Dayton's
satellite site.
Four Hundred Sixteen Dollars ($ 416 )
BID ITEM 9A: (lot) Satellite receiver system for
Boone Avenue water tower site.
. Two Thousand Six Hundred Forty -two Dollars ($ '' 6 * 2 _ )
BID ITEM 10A: -(lot) - Installation for Boone Avenue
satellite site.
One Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Five Dollars.
BID ITEM 11A: (1) Fire main.(154,430/155,055)
base station.
50/100
SIX Thousand Nine .Hun Eight and Dollars ($ 6,908.50.)
BID ITEM 12A: (lot) Installation.for fire main °
base station.
1,319
-- One Thousand Three Nineteen Dollars ($ )
BID ITEM 13A: (1) Fire standby (154,430/154,295) y
base station.
- and 50/100
Five Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty Eight Dollars ($ 5,838.50
BID ITEM 14A: (lot) Installation for fire standby
° base station.
One. Thousand _Three Hundred Nineteen Dollars ($ 1.319 - )
BID ITEM 15A: (1) Sheriff /point -to -point station.
Five T a �gnd Th P N1md d Forty Three Dollars ($ 5.343 _-
BID ITEM 16A: (lot) Installation for sheriff/
-to-point int station.
point
0
P
® One Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Four Dollars 0 7„334 )
Page 2 of 5
Proposal "All
BID ITEM 17A: (1) UHF metro control station.
Three Thousand Fifty Dollars . ($ 3,050
)
BID ITEM 18A: (lot) Installation for uhf metro
control station.
Eight Hundred Forty Two Dollars ($ 842 )
BID ITEM 19A: (1) UHF public works repeater. --
Three Thousand Four Hundred Ninety One Dollars ($ 3,419 )
BID ITEM 20A: (lot) Installation for uhf public works
repeater.
Six Hundred Sixty Four Dollars ($ 664 )
BID ITEM 21A: (1) Paging dial interconnect equipment
for public works.
Two Thousand Seven Hundred Thirty Three Dollars ($ 2,733
BID ITEM 22A: (lot) Installation of dial inter -
connect equipment and rework of
existing desk sets. -
One Hundred Sixty One Dollars ($ 161 )
- BID ITEM 23A:
- (lot) Rework of 45,660 kHz station. _
One Thousand Four Hundred Twenty Nine Dollars 1,424
($ )
BID ITEM 24A: (1) NOAH receiver system.
Seven hundred Thirty Three Dollars ($ 733 )
BID ITEM 25A: (1) MINSEF receiver system
• ..
Three Hundred Seventy, 377 Seven Dollars ($ ) _
BID ITEM 26A: (2) Desk set/Orator-combinations.
Each $ 46Q
' Nine Hundred Twenty
Dollars
Page 3 of 5
. 8
Proposal "An ,
BID ITEM 27A: (2) Installation for desk set /Orators.
Each $ 20� 5
Four Hundred Ten Dollars ($ 410 )
BID ITEM 28A: (lot) Center and left operating positions
of the main dispatch console.
Forty Thousand Thirty Six and 25/100 Dollars ($ 40,036.25
BID ITEM 29A: (lot) _Installation for center and left
positions of the main console.
Four Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety One Dollars ($ 4,891 )
_ __.
BID ITEM 30A: (lot) Right operating position of the
main dispatch console._
Thirteen Thousand Three Hundred Ten Dollars
BID ITEM 31A: (lot) Installation for the right
position of the main console.
Two Thousand One Hundred Forty Five Dollars
BID ITEM 32A: (lot) Antenna pole painting.
Seven Hundred Dollars ($ 700 ) -
BID ITEM 33A: (lot) Signal connections to logging ,
tape recorder.
Three Hundred Thirty Dollars ($ 330 )
GRAND TOTAL:
Eight and 75/10Q
One Hundred Fourteen Thousand Four Hundre 6ollars
$94,856.75
- The above includes all State and Federaltaxes together with
..shipping charges and all other costs which would affect the
amount of this bid.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the following addenda
to the Specifications. Give number and date of each, , respectively.
Page 4 of 5
MOTOROLA, INC.
Proposal "B`
Logging Tape Recorder
Date August 24, 1982
To: Mr. Brad Hoffman,
Purchasing Agent
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
The undersigned, being familiar with the local conditions af-
fecting the work and with the Contract Documents, including
Advertisement for Bids, Proposal, Specifications, Explanation
of Bid Items, General Conditions and Addena which govern the
purchase of material and labor and awarding of contract, here -
by proposes to do all the work and provide all the material
and equipment which pertains to improvements in the City of
Brooklyn Center police /fire emergency services logging communi-
cations as provided for in the accompanying Specifications
dated June 21, 1982, for the following:
-BID ITEM 1B (lot) Logging. =tape recorder and accessories.
Twenty One Thousand One Hundred Fourteen Dollars ($ 21,114 )
The above includes all State and Federal taxes together with
shipping charges and all other costs which would affect the
amount of this bid.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the lowing addenda
to the Specifications. Give number and date of each, respec-
tively.
Accompanying this proposal is a certified check, cashier's
check or draft in the amount of five percent (5 %) of the bid_
payable to the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, in the
amount of $ or a bid bond in the amount of 5% of -
bid amount -issue b - a surety authorized to do business_ in e
State of Minnesota.
In accordance with the provisions of the General Conditions of
these Specifications under the heading "Or Equal Clause" this
Contractor proposes to use the following designated equipment
in lieu of that specified with additions to or deductions from
the Bid Items amount indicated below. Items listed below will
Page 1 of 2
GENERAL ELECTRIC ti
•
Proposal "A!'
Two Way Radio Equipment
Date August 24, 1982
To: Mr. Brad Hoffman,
Purchasing Agent
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brookly Center, Minnesota 55430
The undersigned, being familiar with the local conditions af-
• o Documents, including
fecting the work and with the Contract Docum g
Advertisement for Bids, Proposal, Specifications, Explanation
of Bid Items, General Conditions and Addenda which govern the
purchase of material and labor and awarding of contract, here-
by proposes to do all the work and provide all the material
and equipment which pertains to improvements in the City of
'Brooklyn Y
Center Communications System provided for in the
accompanying Specifications dated June 21, 1982, for the
following:
g.
- BID ITEM 1A: (1) Police mobile relay station.
Six thousand five hundred t i /
- -00 rt v Z100 Dollars ($ 6. 5.30 0 (L-
BID ITEM 2A: (lot) Installation for police mobile
relay station.
. One thousand one hundred - - -00 /100
Dollars ($ 1,100.00 )
BID ITEM 3A: (1) Police voting comparator
One thousand six hundred eight - -- 00/100 Dollars ($ 1,608.00
BID ITEM 4A: (lot) Installation for police,voting
comparator.
Five hundred dollars and.00 /100 -- Dollars ($ 500,00 )
BID ITEM 5A: (1) Fire voting comparator,
One thousand six hundred eight - - -00 /100 Dollars ($ 1,608.00 )
BID ITEM 6A:
(lot) Installation for fire voting
comparator.
Five hundred dollars and 00 /100 - -- Dollars ($ 500.00 )
Page l of 5
Proposal "A!'
BID ITEM 7A: (lot) Satellite receiver system for
Dayton's Department Store.site.
Three thousand three hundred ninetv-foucD ($
BID ITEM 8A: (lot) Installation for Dayton's
satellite site.
Six hundred dollars and 00/100 -- Dollars ($ 600.00) _
BID ITEM 9A: (lot) Satellite receiver system for
Boone Avenue water tower site.
Three thousand six hundred ninety- seven Dollars
BID ITEM 1OA: (lot) Installation for Boone Avenue -
satellite site.
One thousand dollars and 00 /100 -- Dollars
...:BID ITEM 11A: (1) Fire main (154,430/155,055)
base station. -
iY- Five thousand two hundred seventy--eight Dollars ($ 5,278.00 )
BID ITEM 12A: (lot) Installation -for fire main
base station.
Seven hundred dollars- -and 00 /100 -- Do -llars ($ 700-00-
BID ITEM 13A: (1) Fire standby (154,430/154,295)
base station.
Five thousand two hundred - seventy -eight Dollars {$ 5
BID ITEM 14A: (lot) Installation for fire standby --
_ base station.
Seven hundred dollars and 00 /100 - -- Dollars ($ 700.00 ).
BID - ITEM 15A: (1) Sheriff /point -to -point station. -
_ Five thousand one hundred four - -- 00/100 Dollars ($ 5,1.0 4_00 ) - - --
BID'ITEM 16A: -- (lot) Installation for sheriff /
point -to -point station:
- Nine hundred dollars and 00 /100 Dollars -($ 900.00'
Page 2 of 5
Proposal "A"
BID ITEM 17A: (1) U11F metro control station.
Five thousand five hundred ei ht - three Dollars ($ 5,583.00 )
BID ITEM 18A: (lot) Installation for uhf metro
control station.
Five hundred fifty Dollars ($ 550.00 )
BID ITEM 19A: (1) UHF public works repeater.
Six thousand seven hundred seventeen - -- Dollars ($ 6,717.00 )
BID ITEM 20A: (lot) Installation for uhf public works
repeater.
Eight hundred dollars and 00/100 - -- Dollars ($ - 800,00
B.ID ITEM 21A: (1) Paging dial interconnect equipment
for public works. e
O ne th four hundred sixty-four--- Dollars ($ 1,464.00 )
BID ITEM 22A: (lot) Installation of dial inter-
connect equipment and rework of
existing desk sets.
Four hund fifty dollars and 00/100 -- Dollars ($ 450.00-!--
BID ITEM 23A: (lot) Rework of 45,660 kHz station. -
Four hundred fifty dollars and 00 /100 - Dollars ($ 4S0,00
BID ITEM 24A: (1) -NOAA- receiver system.
One thousand two hundred- ninety- one 00 /I DOI ar-s;($ 1.291.00 )` '
- - BID ITEM 25A: (1) MINSEF receiver system
-•-
-One hu sixty d ollars and 00/100 - -- Dollars ($ 160.00
BID ITEM 26A: (2) Desk set /Orator combinations.
Each $ '434.00
o
Eight hundred s —e ight an d 00 /100 - -- Dollars .($. 868.00
Page 3 of 5
Proposal "A�o
BID ITEM 27A: (2) Installation for desk set /Orators.
Each $ 100.00
Two hundred dollars and 00/100 - -- Dollars ($ 200.00
BID ITEM 28A: (lot) Center and left operating positions
— of the main dispatch console.
w
— Fifty three thousand one hundred thirty Dollars ($ 53,132.00
two-- -
BID ITEM 29A: (lot) Installation for center and left
positions of the main console.
Six thousand dollars and 00/100 -- Dollars ($ 6,000.00
- - ITEM 30A: .(lot) Right operating position of the
main dispatch console.
Nineteen thousand nine hundred eighty - on (Dollars ($ 4 4 Y 981 -04 -
BID ITEM 31A:
(lot) Installation .far the right
position of the main console.
r
One thousand five hundred and 00/100 - -- Dollars
BID ITEM 32A: (lot) Antenna pole painting.
(1 [kP +ho san& and 00 /100 - -- D ollars ($ 1,000.00_)
BID ITEM 33A :, (lot) Signal connections to logging
- -- - -tape recorder.
Two hun dred fifty and 00/100 - -- Dollars ($ 250.00 }
BRAND -- TOTAL - _ -_
One hundred thirty e thousand
I�
Y 9 Dollars (-$ 449094v10 )
ei!q[it h undred ninety t ree and QO 1QQ - -- $ 12,715..0
The-above- includes all State and Federal taxes toget�ier wit
�i
: shipping charges and all other costs which would affect the
buount of this bid.
The undersigned acknowledges- receipt of the following addenda
n- to the Specifications. Give number and date of each,.respectively.
Addendum #1, dated 8 -3 -
` gage 4 of 5
e
-_-- --�— —._. ___._...��. _-- .,.-.�
F
i
t
e
REMODELING
Construction $10,875.00
Architects Fee 1,350.00
I
MOTOROLA
Consoles & Equipment Proposal A $ 94,856.75
Recorder Proposal B 21,114.00
TOTAL $115,970.75
e
GENERAL ELECTRIC M
COMMUNICATIONS
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ............. 7360 BUSH LAKE ROAD, SUITE 105 D I V I S I O N
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435. Phone (612) 831 -2220
September 1, 1982
James Lindsay
Chief of Police
Brooklyn Center P.D.
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Subject: Portable Radio Quote
Dear Chief Lindsay:
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me this morning. �.
General Electric is pleased to extend the State of Minnesota bid to you
for portable radios. The prices are as follows:
ITEM MODEL & DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE
1 P4BJJ65FEN 2 watt MPX Personal Radio including $1,200.00.
6 channels, "B" case, '1 tone CTCS,
Timer, UHS Receiver, and 750 MA Battery
Note: Over 25 Price $1,170.00
2 P4HC17 Swivel Mount Plate and Belt Loop $ 17.00
3 P4HC20 Spare Belt Loop $ 10.00
4 P4AE12 Speaker Microphone $ 60.00
5 351M3A2X Single Unit 3 hour A.C. Charger $ 60.00
6 152MIBIX 6 Unit 3 hour A.C. Charger $ 257.00
7 354C3A1X Vehicular Charger only $ 160.00
8 P4PA10 Spare 750 MA Battery $ 40.00
9 P48C11 Leather carrying case $ 17.00
The -750 MA Battery Rating with a 2 watt transmitter at 5 -5 -90% Duty. Cycle is
8 hours.
Delivery is approximately 8 weeks ARO. These prices are good for 30 days. If
y ou have an -
y y questions please call me. -
Thank you.
Sincerely, ,
Jim Amos
iMajor Account Manager
JA /ra
GENERAL ELECTRIC
15 Portables @ 1,200.00 $18,000.00
2 Portable Cases @17.00 34.00
15 Batteries @40.00 600.00
3 Single Chargers @60.00 180.00
3 Rack Chargers (beach) @257.00 771.00
10 Belt Loops @10.00 100.00
2 Mikes @60.00 120.00
15 Leather Carrying Cases @17.00 255.00
TOTAL $20,060.00
Address Reply to:
11100 Bren Road West
/MOTOROLA Minr►etonka, MN 55343
Communications and Electronics Inc. (612) 932 -9500
September 7, 1982
Chief Lindsay
City of Brooklyn Center Police Department
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Dear Chief Lindsay:
In response to Ward Montgomery's letter of August 4,
1982, Motorola
zppieciates the opportunity to provide a quotation for the following
equipment:
{�) DVP Repeater, (2) DVP Mobiles, (5) DVP Portables, and (15) Standard
Syntor Mobiles.
The DVP Products quoted are based on GSA pricing levels. The pricing for
the Standard Syntor Mobiles were included as -an option to the bid for radio
communications equipment.
Thank you again for the opportunity to provide pricing information. If you
.have any questions, please contact me at 932 -9542.
..Sincerely,
-IMOROLA, Inc.
Communications & Electronics
Gail-V. Fiscella _
Account Representative
GVF /em
tc: Ward Montgomery
- I= E. Algonquin Rd., Schaumburg, Illinois 60196 (312) 397.1000
t
(D) SYMR MBILES
(i Description Unit Price Extended Price
15 T43SRA3200 -K VHF Syntor mobile with 40
watts, 8 frequency, with charmel scan,
un1tiple slaved private line and 4 wave $ 1,396.00 $20,940.00
antenna
15 T43SRA3800 -K VHF Syntor Mobile (same $ 1,396.00 $20,940.00
as above with 12 frequency)
II. INSTALLATION QUCITATION
(A) Installation and optimization of DVP repeater base $ 418.00
station
(-) Installation and .optimization of 17 mobiles
1. I-btorola Service Center $ 2,380.00
2. Customer Location $ 2,890.00
(C) , Checkout and frequency certification of 5 DVP
• $ 115.00
portable radios
III. SHIPPING SCfED U E
(A) DNP Base Station 26 weeds
(B) DVP Portables
10 weeks
(C) DVP Mobiles 8 weeks
Standard Mobiles 7 weeks
1
Z. I GTATION
(A) DVP BASE S'rATIOrI
ti Description Extended Price
1 C7M3106 DVP Mcor Repeater with a second receiver $11,581.00
3I
Includes:
2 C140 "and" squelch
1 C226 service intercom
1 TN!'Qi 6071 test microphone
1 C601 +.000Z' /, transmit
2 0621 +.0002 /o receiver
1 15 -37 -01 Tx -Rx varinotch
1 TDD6310 20 dB isolator
1 C308 46" indoor cabinet
], W 6021 46" wall mount kit
(B) DVP HOMES
i Description
Wt Price Extended Price
2 T43IXA3200K VHF DVP Syntor mobile with 40
watts; 8 frequency with channel scan,
=Atiple private line; proper code detect;
code storage and 4 wave antenna $ 2,954.00 $ 5,908.00
2 T431XA3D00 VHF DVP Syntor Mobile (same as
$ 2,954.00 _ $ 5, 908.00
above with 16 frequencies)
(C) DVP PoIr MES
�i Description.
Unit Price Extended Price
5 M3AMJ3160t4 VHF DVP lIX360 portable' with 6
frequency; 2.5 watts; time- out - timer;
swivel case and T -strap and 1 hour charge $ 3627.00 $18,140.00'
battery
4 =46071 Speaker/Microphone $ 74.00 296.00
1 NLN8988 6 unit charger with wall mount kid $ 494.00
.
1 T301OX Code Inserter $ 1
4 NLN8858 Single Unit Charger $ .120.00 $ 480.00
$20,825.25
• t
MOTOROLA
15 Mobiles $20,940.00
2 Mobiles w /DVP 5,908.00
5 Portables w /DVP 18,140.00
1 Code Inserter 1,415.25
1 Base DVP 11,581.00
4 Mikes 296.00
.4 Single Chargers 480.00
1 6 Unit Charger 494.00
Installation DVP Repeater
Base Station
418.00
890.00
Installation Mobiles 2,890.00
Frequency cert of 5 DVP
i
Portable Radios - 115.00
'TOTAL $62,677.25
e
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FOR POLICE
DEPARTMENT REMODELING
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Police Department
remodeling authorized by the City Council on July 12, 1982, bids were received,
opened, and tabulated by the City Clerk on the 24th day of August, 1982. Said
bids were as follows:
Bidder Bid Amount Completion Date
C. 0. Field Company $10,875.00 45 days
Morcon Construction 10,880.00 October 31, 1982
Parkos Construction Company 11,333.00 September 13, 1982
Superior 77 11,413.00 December 18, 1982
Kloster - Madsen, Inc. 11,867.00 October 1, 1982
Roanoke 11,885.00 January 1, 1983
Falls & Nyhusmoen Construction 12,233.00 November 15, 1982
David Volkmann Construction
Company 12,692.00 January 1, 1983
Gem Construction 13,448.00 January 1, 1983
Henry 0. Mikkelson Company 14,480.00 50 days
Arrow Builders, Inc. 14,873.00 None Listed
L Northstar Remodeling 14,950.00 10 days
WHEREAS, it appears that C. 0. Field Company is the lowest responsible
bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE - CITY - COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota:
-~ 1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby -'authorized and directed to
enter enter into a contract in the amount of $10,875.00, with C. O. Field
__- Company in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for 'Police 'Depart-
ment remodeling according to the plans and specifications therefor
approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that
deposit of the successful bidder -and the -next lowest bidder shall•be '
retained until a contract has -been signed.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the'same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
la N
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF PORTABLE RADIO EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center has appro-
priated $225,000 to the Capital Projects Fund for the upgrading of the City's
Radio Communications System; and
WHEREAS, the -City of Brooklyn Center has received a quotation for the
purchase of portable radios from General Electric of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Said
quotation is made as part of the State of Minnesota bid; and
WHEREAS, the quotation submitted by General Electric is as follows:
15 portables @ $1,200 $18,000
2 portable cases @ $17 34
15 batteries @ $40 600
3 single chargers @ $60 180
3 rack chargers (beach) @ $257 771
10 belt loops @ $10 100
2 mikes @ $60 120
15 leather carrying cases @ $17 255 .
Grand Total $20,060
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to._
-enter into an agreement for the purchase of the above described
portable radio equipment, with .General Electric of Minneapolis,....__ _.
Minnesota, in the amount of $20,060.
Date Mayor
_.
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by.
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
o
Member introduced the following resolution
t
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF MOBILE RADIO EQUIPMENT
AND DVP EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center has appro-
priated $225,000 to the Capital Projects Fund for the upgrading of the City's
Radio Communication System; and
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has received a quotation from
Motorola, Inc. of Minnetonka, Minnesota, for the purchase of mobile radio equip
ment; and
WHEREAS, said mobile radio equipment is considered a noncompetitive
bidding item since the equipment comprehends a technology that is only offered by
Motorola, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, the quotation submitted by Motorola, Inc. is as follows,_.. -_�. --
15 mobiles $20,940.00
2 mobiles with DVP 5,908.00
5 portables with DVP 18,140.00 --
1 code inserter 1,415.25
1 base DVP 11,581.00
4 mikes 296.00
4 single chargers 480.00
1 6 -unit charger 494.00
Installation of DVP repeater base station 418.00
Installation of mobiles 2,890.00
Frequency certification of 5
DVP portable radios 115.00
TOTAL $62,677.25
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized
and directed to enter into an agreement with Motorola, Inc. of Minnetonka, Minne-
sota, for the purchase of the above described mobile radio equipment in the amount
of $62,677.25.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by'
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
13o-
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.
1982 -08 (EARLE BROWN DRIVE STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION)
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the
City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed
Special Assessment Levy No. 8554 and has not deemed it just to amend such proposed
assessment for the following improvement:
STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -08
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract
of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such improvement shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of two (2) years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
1983, and shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12 %)
per annum from October. 1, 1982. To the first installment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from October 1, 1982, until
December 31, 1983. To each subsequent installment when due shall
be added interest for one year on -all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the City Treasurer, except - that -no interest shall be
charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the
adoption of this resolution; and -he may, at-any time thereafter,<
pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the
year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made
before November 15, or interest will be charged through December
31 of the succeeding year.
_4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of '
this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper
tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected
and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
s
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by .
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
4 ;
III
PAGE 1 QF.3...
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY` INFORMATION_
Improvement Project No. 1982 -08 Levy No. 8554
Description: Installation of Street Li4hting Levy Description: STREET LIGHT (82 -08) 82
Levy runs two years (from 1983 t 1984 )
with interest at the rate of twelve percent (_ .
Location: Along Earle Brown Drive within the platted area known as First payment, with property taxes payable in 1983
BROOKDALE CORPORATE CENTER shall include fifteen whole months interest.
Improvement hearing date May 10, 1982 Date of Assessment Hearing September 13, 1982
Improvement ordered on May 10, 1982 Adopted on
by Resolution No. 82 -84 by Resolution No.
Assessment District (from Notice of Hearing): Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: z
Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1380.; Lot 1, Block 1,
Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, and Outlot B, BROOKOALE CORPORATE CENTER
Method of Apportiormnentl By. area, total benefited area determined
to .be 14.08 acres
Assessment rate $320,3125 per acre
Cost Summary (from Resolution No.. 82- 141 )
i
Total Improvement Cost $4,510.00 estimated
Less Direct City Share (Fund j NONE
Less Other Payments NONE t
Total Assessed to Property $4,510,00
Assessed to City Owned Property NONE
Assessed to Other Public Property NONE
k
Assessed to Private Property $4,510.00
-- CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER -- PAGE OF `
MUNIC CODE N0. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
PROPERTY TO ADDRESS NAME -
LEVY NO. PROJ. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. ADON. N0. PRINCIPAL LOT 'BLOCK UNITS ADDITION? LEGAL DESCRIPI12I MAILING ADDRESS
Brookdale Corporate Center
1 8554 35- 1)9 -21 =43 -0006 01238 1,675.00 1 1 Vacant P
� 7401 Metro Boulevard #500
BROOKDALE CORPORATE CENTER ONE CORPORATE CENTER
Edina MN 55435
2 8554 35- 119 -21 -43 -0007 01238 884.00 1 2 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway
BROOKDALE CORPORATE CENTER SAME AS ABOVE
3 8554 35- 119 -21 -43 -0008 01238 827.00 2 2 Vacant
BROOKDALE CORPORATE CENTER SAME AS ABOVE
4 8554 35- 119 -21 -44 -0007 01238 256.00 -- -- Vacant
Outlot B, SAME AS ABOVE !
BROOKDALE CORPORATE CENTER
i 5 8554 35-119-21-44-0001 89780 868.00 -- -- 6150`Summi't Drive Consolidated Financial Corp.
Tract B
? 6100 Summit Drive North
y
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY N0. 1380 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
'3
}
1
3 ,
1
E
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
• t '13 b
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
4 A
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DISEASED SHADE TREE REMOVAL COSTS
TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS
WHEREAS, the Tree Inspector of the City of Brooklyn Center has causd
- the removal of diseased shade trees on certain property within the City during
1981 and a portion of 1982 under the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section
18.023 and by written agreement with the owners of such property; and
WHEREAS, four assessment rolls, a copy of each of which is attached
hereto and made part hereof by reference, have been prepared by the City Clerk,
one tabulating for each year those properties where diseased shade tree removal
_costs are less than or equal to $300.00 and one tabulating for each year those
properties where diseased shade tree removal costs are greater than $300.00
together with the amounts proposed to be assessed to each property; and - - -- --
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,-
the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed
assessment for Diseased Shade Tree Removal Costs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Said assessment rolls of diseased shade tree removal costs are
hereby adopted and certified as the following levies: - -
1981 tree removal costs less than or equal to $300.00 as Levy No. 8555
1981 tree removal costs greater than $300.00 as Levy No. 8556
1982 tree removal costs less than or equal to $300.00 as Levy No. 8563
1982 tree removal costs greater than $300. 'as Levy No. 8564
2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of years as- listed below. The first of
the installments shall be payable on or before the first Monday
in January, 1983, and shall bear interest at the rate of eight
percent per annum for trees removed during 1981 and at the rate
of twelve percent per annum for trees removed during 1982.from
October 1, 1982, until the amounts have been -paid in full. To
the first installment shall be added interest on the entire
assessment for fifteen months from October 1, 1982, until December
31, 1983. To each subsequent installment due shall be added
interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
a. Assessments less than or equal to $300.00 -are payable
three annual installments.
b. Assessments greater than $300.00 are payable in five annual
installments.
RESOLUTION NO.
0 3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
-' certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be.
charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the
adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter,
pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the
year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made
before November 15, or interest will be charged through December
31 of the succeeding year.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate
of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the
proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be
collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal
taxes.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT .ROLL PAGE I dF.6
ER9JECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No. Levy No. 8555
Description: Cost of diseased shade tree removal to those tracts Levy Description: TREE REMOVAL 82 -3
or parcels,where trees were removed during 1981, by
written agreement with the property owner or by order Levy runs three years (from 1983 to 1985 )
of the City Tree Inspector, at a cost less than or
equal to $300.00. with interest at the rate of eight percent
Location: First payment, with property taxes payable in 1983
• shall include fifteen whole months interest.
Improvement hearing date Date of Assessment Hearing September 13, 1982
Improvement ordered on Adopted on
by Resolution No. by Resolution No.
Assessment District (from Notice of Hearing)t Corrections, Deletions or Deferments j
Method of Apportionments {
{
i
Cost Summary (from Resolution No. )
i
Total Improvement Cost j
Less Direct City Share (Fund )
Less Other Payments
Total Assessed to Property $6,044.58
Assessed to City Owned Property NONE
Assessed to Other Public Property NONE
Assessed to Private Property $6,044.58
t
v
I
N
C
h
£ --- CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER --� PAOE 2 OF 6 .;.
MuNIC coot No, .l:r,.., SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY' TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
LEVY NO. PROD. N0, ADON, NO. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME ----
IDENTIFICATION N0. PRINCIPAL ADDITION/LEGAL ES RI TIO AILING ADDRES§
1 8555 36- 119 -21 -21 -0012 89105 264.79 32 -- 6800 Bryant Ave. N. Jeffery L. or Luwayne S. Laugerman
W 150 ft of that part of Lot 32, 6800 Bryant Ave. N.
Aud. Subd. No. 310, lying S of Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
2 8555 01- 118 -21 -23 -0073 89575 233.00 4 -- 5823 Emerson Ave. N. Michael Kulikowski
5823 Emerson Ave. N.
"1 ADDITION" Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
r
3 8555 34- 119 -21 -12 -0058 90010 111.16 5 3 6736 Ewing Ave, N. Stephen M. and Judy A. Zorn
6736 Ewing Ave. N.
SANAA11L ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
4 8555 01- 118 -21 -21 -0059 89431 189.52 6 2 5912 Dupont Ave. N, Richard J. Lindquist
5912 Dupont Ave. N.
IIALEK'S 2ND ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
5 8555 35- 119 -21 -32 -0040 89390 100.74 '° 25: 5 2818 64th Ave. No.. John E. M andrich
2818 64th Avenue North
GARDEN CITY 1ST ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
6 8555 01- 118 -21 -32 -0066 89001 276.86 -- -- 5568 Humboldt Avenue North Howard W. Haselhorst
That part of the N 1/5 of S 112 of 5568 Humboldt Avenue North
W 1 4 of NW 10 of SW 1!4 yang W Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 ion I
7 8555 02- 118 -21 -43 -0063 89965 171.92 6 3 5413 Logan Avenue North Roland G. Matt
JOHN RYDEN ADDITION 5413 Logan Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
8 8555 '— 34- 119 -21 -14 -0077 89397 116.86 26 2 3112 Quarles Road Stephen J. & Judy M. Peterson
3112 Quarles Road
GARDEN CITY 7TH ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
9 8555 33- 119 -21 -14 -0066 89346 51.63 38 2 5016 66th Avenue North Joseph Strychar
5016 66th Avenue North
DONNAYS BROOK LYN GARDENS 4TH ADDN. Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
10 8555 10- 118 -21 -13 -0026 89275 113.28 29 4 4931 Beard Avenue North Laurence C. Thill
4931 Beard Avenue North
BROOKLYN MANOR Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER -- PAGE 3 OF 6
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
LEVY NO. PROJ. N0. ADON. NO. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME -
IDENTIFICATION N0. PRINCIPAL ADDITION /LEG 5 T 0 AILING DR SS
11 8555 01- 118 -21 -34 -0072 89225 92.58 8 4 5309 Bryant Avenue North Glen 0. Petersen
BELLVUE ACRES 5309 Bryant Avenue North
S 112 of E 112 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
12 8555 27- 119 -21 -32 -0071 89634 43.17 9 1 4524 Woodbine Lane Raymond 0. Kuckenbecker
4524 Woodbine Lane
NORTHBROOK MANOR 3RD ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
13 8555 01- 118 -21 -34 -0030 89225 143.78 11 3 810 53rd Avenue North Daniel B. & Kim L. Henke
BELLVUE ACRES 810 53rd Avenue North
W 50 FT of E 150 FT Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
14 8555 27 - 9 -2 -3 ;0027 89256 187.64 11 2 7212 Halifax Avenue North J. Thomas Plante
7212 Halifax Avenue North
BOBENDRIER "S 2ND ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
15 8555 03- 118 -2124 -0039 89665 141:78 17 1 3812 France Place George Arneson
3812 France Place
'PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 1ST ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
16 8555 34- 119 -21 -32 -0098 89600 116.13 7 1 6407 June Avenue North Rudy A. Ogle
6407 June Avenue North
MILLER'S NORTHVIEW HEIGHTS Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
17 8555 01- 118 -21 -12 -0037 89510 209.76 11 l 6012 Camden Avenue North Terry Lemke
6012 Camden Avenue North
A. J. LARSEN'S ADDITION Brooklyn Center MN 55430.
y . j
18 8555 01- 118 -21 -32 -0083 89545 173.37 4 2 5519 Dupont Avenue North Stanley Michael Waletko
5519 Dupont Avenue North
3 LITTELL ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
19 8555 25- 119 -21 -41 =0036 90033 116.13 4 1 7224 Willow Lane North Maryll.yn Dinsmore
7224 Willow Lane North
SUNNY -BROOK TERRACE Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 F
20 8555 03- 118 -21 -21 -0065 89667 51.31 12 7 j 5918 Hal ifaxt Avenue North Erwin B. Heisler
5918 Halifax Avenue North
PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
i
4
1
�--- CITY OF 13ROOKLYN CENTER --m PAGE 4 Op �
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
LEVY NO. PROJ. N0. ADON. N0. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME
IDENTIFICATION N0. PRINCIPAL - ADDITION/LEGAL SC T 0 AILING ADDRESS
21 8555 01- 118 -21 -24 -0107 89560 116.13 25 -- 5835 Camden Avenue North Roger J. Dunn
LYNDALE RIVERSIDE ACRES 5835 Camden Avenue North
E 112 of Lot 25 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
22 8555 03- 118 -21 -13 -0039 89420 142.52 5 3 5801 Ewing Avenue North Harold & Alice Johnson
5702 West Broadway
GRIMME'S ADDITION Minneapolis, MN 55428
Raymond A. & Lillian B. Rice
NOTICE ALSO SENT TO: 5836 Xerxes Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
j 23 8555 27- 119 -21 -43 -0105 89664 221.08 8 3 3512 69th Avenue North Vance E. & Yvonne Esters
3512 69th Avenue North
PALMER LAKE TERRACE 3RD ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 {
24 8555 03- 118 -21 -13 -0051 89665 76.56 5 5 3601 Admiral Lane William R. Rosen Sr.
Carolyn M. Rosen
PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 1ST ADDITION 3601 Admiral Lane
Brookl n Center MN 5542
25 8555 027118 -21 -22 -0043 89441 122.84 9 5 5901 Vincent Avenue North Thomas E. Ahern
i 5901 Vincent Avenue North
HIPP'S 4TH ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
26 8555 03- 118 -21 -13 -0086 89667 61.45 7 4 5836 Admiral Lane Lucille D. Nelsen.
5836 Admiral Lane
PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 .
27 8555 01- 118 -21 -24 -0078 89560 53.53 -- -- 5821 Camden Avenue North Larry W. Karkela
LYNDALE RIVERSIDE ACRES 329 North Vinewood Road
E 1/2 OF THAT PART OF LOT 26 LYING Plymouth, MN 55441
S OF N 79 FT THEREOF AND E 112 OF
THAT PART OF LOT 27 LYING N OF S
79 FT THEREOF LOTS 26 AND 27
28 8555 34- 119 -21 -32 -0076 89465 78.71 1 2 6343 Kyle Avenue North Lois J. Hoff
6343 Kyle Avenue North
HOMEDALE FIRST ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
MUNIC CODE No. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
PROPERTY TOTAL] PROJ. N0. ADDN. N0. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME -
LEVY N0
IDENTIFICATION NO. PRINCIPAI ADDITION /L G AILING DDR S
29 8555 10- 118 -21 -13 -0022 89275 87.1'2 25 4 4907 Beard Avenue North. Arnold B. Lanhart
4.907 Beard Avenue North
BROOKLYN MANOR Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
30 8555 34- 119 -21 -43 -0032 89525 78.71 1 3 3401 62nd Avenue North - Lavelle Dean Beers
3401 62nd Avenue North
LAWNRIDGE Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
31 8555 01- 118 -21 -21 -0005 89295 .286.66 4 2 5937 Camden Avenue.North Rodney 0. & Judith A. Holm
CAMDEN ACRES 5937 Camden Avenue North
THAT PART LYING E W 50 FT Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
I
32 8555 01- 118 -21 -33 -0030 89350 61.19 14 2 5314 Humboldt Avenue North Berna H u m bo l d t d F. E d Avenue North
;ELLSWORTH ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
33 8555 02- 118 -21 -42 -0018 89376 185,06 12 1 �5524°Morgan Avenue North James R. Quayle Jr. &Wanda L.
$524 Morgan Avenue North
FRANZEN'S.2ND ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
34 8555 03- 118 -21 -13 -0052 89665 62.76 6 5 3509'Admiral Lane " A.' J. Mitchell
3509 Admiral Lane
PEARSON'S NORTHPORT IST ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
35 8555 34- 119 -21 -42 -0007 89370 235,17 5 2 6301 Brooklyn Boulevard M. Donald Blom
6301 Brooklyn Boulevard
M FAIR MEADOWS EX HWY Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
36 8555 27- 119 -21 -43 -0014 89662 42.71 4 2 7037 Drew Avenue North Timothy J. & Jacqueline L. Graham
7037 Drew Avenue North
PALMER LAKE TERRACE Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
'
37 8555 02- 118 -21 -44 -0085 89590 79.44 4 3 5406 Knox Avenue_North Leonard H. Gerdes
�Ia
F 5406 Knox Avenue North
MERI -DALE ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
38 a
8555 03- 118 -21 -11 - 0083 8�44p -__ __ 9 - 7 5901 Zenith Avenue North Bruce E. Houle
5901 Zenith Avenue North
I HIPPIS 3RD ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
COUNCIL: ACTION NQTES
i �
- VI i 1 ." VI Y•i 4iV 1 \4. i 1] V' W 1{ 1 it l{ r - 5 • �� +MiH�i�V/F d' <�
MUNIC CODE NO 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
PROPERTY
LEVY NO. PROJ. NO. IDENTIFICATION N0. ADON. NO. PRIN CIPA L LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME -
ADD I ITION/ EG SC MAILING 6ODRgS
39 8555 33.- 119 -21 -41 -0049 89245 99.93 19 3 6300 Perry Avenue North Gene D. & Linda G. Loftus
j1 6300 Perry Avenue North
BERGSTROM'S LYNSIDE MANOR Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
40 8555 35- 119 -21 -32 -0065 89390 51.66 14 6 2819 64th Avenue North Marvice R. Hoecherl
2819 64th Avenue North
GARDEN CITY 1ST ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
41 8555 02- 118 -21 -44 -0116 89590 51.66 5 6 5332 Irving Avenue North Donald D. & Sandra L. Woolard
5332 Irving Avenue North
MERI -DALE ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
42 8555 02- 118 -21 -43 -0092 89966 51.54 5 4 5401 Morgan Avenue North Mabel 1. Ross
5401 Morgan Avenue North
1 JOHN RYDEN SECOND ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
'} 43 8555 01- 118 -21 -42 -0023 89385 205.42 - 5607 Lyndale Avenue North Clement L. & Helen S. Murphy
GARCELON'S`ADDI'TION TO MPLS. 5607 Lyndale Avenue North
N 2 FT OF -.LOT 22 AND S 60 FTOF Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
LOT T 23 EX. TATE HW
44 02- 118 -21 -41 -0004 89103 114.25 54 5639 Humboldt Avenue North Terry Earl Case
AUDITOR'S NO. 218 5639 Humboldt Avenue North
S 80 FT OF N 282 FT Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
45 8555 01- 118 -21 -34 -0003 89225 184.80 -- 3 am en Avenue North August G. & Karen L. Ange son
I BELLVUE ACRES 115206 3rd Avenue North
E 149 FT OF S 37 FT OF LOT 1 AND E Minneapolis, MN 55441
149 FT OF N 10 FT OF LOT 2
46 8555 O1- 118 -21 -21 -0109 89763 144.79 -- -- 5927 Bryant Avenue North Marilyn J. Reedy
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1271 5927 Bryant Avenue North
TRACT J Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
i
47 8555 34- 119 -21 -13 -0009 89100 208.29 8 -- 6520 Brooklyn Boulevard Robert J. Plummer
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 25 6520 Brooklyn Boulevard
COM AT A PT IN THE CTR LINE OF STATE Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
HWY NO 152 DIS 371 8/10 FT NWLY
MEAS ALONG SAID CTR LINE FROM S LINE
OF N 112 OF SEC 34 T 119 R21 TH SELY
.j
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
t
•
Y
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PAGE I OF?,_
PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No. Levy No. 8556
Description. Cost of diseased shade tree removal to those tracts Levy Description: TREE REMOVAL 82 -5
or parcels where trees were removed during 1981, by
I written agreement with the property owner or by order Levy runs five years (from 1983 to 1987 )
of the City Tree Inspector, at a cost greater than
$300.00.. with interest at the rate of eight percent (__
Location: First payment, with property taxes payable in 1983
shall include fifteen whole months interest.
Improvement hearing date Date of Assessment Hearing September 13, 1982
Improvement ordered on Adopted on
by Resolution No. by Resolution No.
Assessment District (from Notice of Hearings Corrections, Deletions or Deferments:
Method of Apportionment:
B
Cost Summary (from Resolution No.)
Total Improvement Cost
Less Direct City Share (Fund
Less Other Payments
Total Assessed to Property $4,492,68
,,Assessed to City Owned property, NONE
Assessed to Other Public Property NONL
Assessed to Private Property $4,492.68
--- GI TY OF N'ViOUKLYN CE;N I EK PAGE OF �:--
M I I MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
LLVY NO. PROJ. NO. ADDN. NO. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME -
IDENTIFICATION NO. PRINCIPAL APDITION/LEGA6 QgSg81ejIQN MAILING ADDRESS
1 8556 03- 118 -21 =43 -0037 89200 387.54 7 3 5342 Sailor Lane Marvin E. Nielsen
5342 Sailor Lane
I BALFANYIS NORTHPORT l'ST ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
2 8556 01- 118=21 -34 -0011 89225. 450.22 5 3 5331 Camden Avenue North' Gerald N. Birosh
BELLVUE ACRES 5331 Camden Avenue North
THAT PART OF N 112 LYING E OF W 1 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
FT
i
3 8556 03- 118 -21 -43 -0076 89200 1,653.59 32 6 3507 53rd Place North Dennis F. & Judith A. Niewind
3507 53rd Place North
BALFANY`S NORTHPORT 1ST ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
4 8556 01- 118 -21 -33 -0094 89675 413.65 -- 2 5435 Emerson Avenue North, Duane W. Enninga
N. & E. PERKINS ADDITION TO MPLS. 5435 Emerson Avenue North
LOTS 6 and 7 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Hashem Mokhtary
i NOTICE ALSO SENT TO: 20324 Hillside Drive
Rogers, MN 55374
y
5 8556 26- 119 -21 -44 -0076 89773 945.92 -- " =- 1700 64th Avenue'North Vern N. Weaver
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1330 5601 Knox Avenue South
TRACT C EX ROAD Minneapolis, MN 55419
6 8556 367119 -21 -41 -0003 89036 341.15 -- -- 6416 Willow Lane North Daniel L. & Georgette.A. Kitchin
6416 Willow Lane North
UNPLATTED 36 119 21 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
i 7 8556 25- 119 -21 -32 -0097 90065 300.61 4 4 7243 Dupont Avenue James R. Mitchell
7243 Dupont Avenue North
TOWER TERRACE Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES °
V
r •
r
z
i
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PAGE I OF ' j-
CROJECT INFORMATION 6EVY INFORMATION
,4 Improvement Project No, Levy No. 8563
Description: Cost of diseased shade tree removal to those tracts Levy Description: TREE REMOVAL 82A -3
or parcels where trees were removed during a portion
of 1982, by written agreement with the property owner Levy runs three y ears (from 1983 t 1985 )
or by order of the City Tree Inspector, at a cost
less than or equal to $300.00. with interest at the rate of twelve percent ( x).
Location: First payment, with property taxes payable in 1983
shall include fifteen whole months interest.
Improvement hearing date Date of Assessment Hearing September 13, 1982
Improvement ordered on Adopted on
by Resolution No. by Resolution No.
y Assessment District (from Notice of Hearing): Corrections, Deletions or Deferments: I
i
Method of Apportionment:
6 C
Cost Summary (from Resolution No. )
Total Improvement Cost
Less Direct City Share (Fund ) i
Less Other Payments
x Total Assessed to Property $2,546.29
Assessed to City Owned Property NONE
Assessed to Other Public Property NONE
Assessed to Private Property $2,546.29
i
— CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PAGE z OF
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
LEVY NO PROJ. NO. ADDN. NO. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME -
IDENTIFICATION NO. PRINCIPAL --ADDITION/ LEGAL ESCRIP O MAILING ADDRESS
1 8563 34- 119 -21 -34 -0112 90094 223.95 l 1 4219 63rd Avenue North Barbara A. Lukat
i 4219 WANGSTAD'S BROOKLYN TERRACE' 5TH ADD Brooklyn North
ynCenter, MN 55429
3
2 8563 27- 119 -21 -33 -0007 89101 220.93 5 -- 7014 Brooklyn Boulevard James H. Skiff
PART OF LOT 5, AUDITOR'S 7014 Brooklyn Boulevard
SUBDIVISION NO. 057 Brooklyn Center,, MN 55429
3 8563 27- 119 -21 -33 -0046 89500 68.96. 9 1 4212 69th Avenue North John H. & Judith A. Nelson
j 4212 69th Avenue North
LANE'S BROOKLYN CENTER ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429.
4 8563 01- 118 -21 -43 -0068 89225 76.62 9 2 5315 4th Street North Vicky L. Rupert
BELLVUE ACRES 5315 4th Street North
N 112 FRONT AND REAR Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
5 8563 02- 118 -21 -23 -0015 89751 .38.21
-- -- .2802 -2.940 Northway Drive _ Center Development Company
I TRACT B Norman Chazin
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1186 5353 Wayzata Blvd. #602
Minneapolis, MN 55416
6 8563 27- 119 -21 -42 -0032 89663 53.73 8 "1 3600 Woodbine Lane Barbara Sines
3600 Woodbine Lane
PALMER LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
7 8563 01- 118 -21 -31 -0068 89545 132.29 1 1 5555 Colfax Avenue North Bruce S. Hoenigschmidt j
5555 Colfax Avenue North
s LITTELL ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
8 8563 03- 118 -21 -31 -0008 89341 213.18 1 2 5615 Indiana Avenue North David A. & Margaret E. Kinney
5615 Indiana Avenue North
DALES' TWIN LAKE ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
9 8563 01- 118 -21 -43 -0073 89225 189.44 11 2 620 53rd Avenue North Jack F. Fahrenholz
BELLVUE ACRES R.A. Zych
W 99 32/100 FT 2836 Silver Lake Road
'
Minneapolis, MN 55418
10 8563 25- 119 -21 -41 -0011 89373 59.91 l 2 7200 Willow Lane North Allen E.- Farmes
7200 Willow Lane North
FARMES ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
COUNCIL. ACTION NOTES q
—CITY OF UHQUKLYN GtN I LH -- VAGt yr
MUNIC CODE No. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ,ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTAL PROPERTY.ASSESSED OWNER
LEVY N0. PROJ. NO. ADDN. N0. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME -
IDENTIFICATION NO. PRINCIPAL ADDITION/LEGAL 5 AILING - ADDRESS
11 8563 01- 118 -21 -P3 -0094 90060 219.21 4 - 5819 Dupont• Avenue'.North. Michael J. Taillefer Jr.
5819 Dupont Avenue North
SYMALLA'S ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
12 8563 25- 119 -21 -33 -0017 89261 77.48 15 1 6926 Emerson Avenue ,North George E. & Janet Sanders 1
6926 Emerson Avenue North
BROOKDALE.MANOR Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
13 8563 02- 118 -21 -41 -0069 89580 188.88 2 3 5651 Knox Avenue North Vernon S. Vendel
2116 West 49th Street'
MEADOWLARK GARDENS. Minneapolis, MN 55409
14 8563 03- 118 -21 -21 -0080 89667 53.57 17 8 5906 June Avenue North Bert R. & Verlyce K. Berg
5906 June Avenue North
PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 3RD ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
15 8563 34- 119 -21 -13 -0009 89100 137.74 8 6520 Brooklyn Boulevard Robert J. Plummer
PART OF LOT'8 6520 Brooklyn Boulevard
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 25 Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
16 8563 03- 119 -21 -24 -0033 89665 53.57 11- 1 3906 France Place Joseph P. Petros
3906 France Place
PEARSON'S NORTHPORT 1ST ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
17 8563 36- 119 -21 =21 -0020 89612 218.56 1 2 6844 Colfax Avenue North James T. Baumgartner
6844 Colfax Avenue North
MORNINGSIDE ESTATES 2ND ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
18 8563 01- 118 -21 -32 -0038 89495 135.18 9 3 4740 Twin Lake Avenue North Du Wayne A. Schake
4740•Twin Lake Avenue North
LAKEBREEZE ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
19 8563 27- 119 -21 -42 -0087 89663 95.81 13 3 3625 72nd Avenue North Bradley S. & Darlys Davidson
3625 72nd Avenue North
PALMER LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
20 8563° 36- 119 -21 -12 -0046 89415 89,07 1 2 6707 5th Street North Hans G. Kueppershaus
6707 5th Street North
GRANDVIEW PLACE FIRST ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES °
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PAGE I OF 2
OJEG? INFORMATION # LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No. levy No. 8564
Description: Cost of diseased shade tree removal to those tracts or parcels levy Description: TREE REMOVAL 82A -5
where trees were removed during a portion of 1982, by written
agreement with the property owner or by Order of the City levy runs five years (from 1983 to 1987 )
Tree Inspector, at a cost greater than $300.00. with interest at the rate of twelve percent ( X),
Location: First payment, with property taxes payable in 1983
shall include fifteen whole months interest.
Improvement hearing date Date of Assessment Hearing September 13, 1982
Improvement ordered on Adopted on
by Resolution No.
by Resolution No.
Assessment District (from Notice of Hearing): Corrections, Deletions or Deferments:
I
Method of Apportionment:
Cost Summary (from Resolution No.. )
i Total Improvement Cost
Less Direct City Share (Fund ) p
Less Other Payments ,
Total Assessed to Property $1,665.74
Assessed to City Owned Property NONE
Assessed to Other Public Property NONE
Assessed to Private Property 51,666.74
GI I Y U:- UIiUUKL.YN GtN I LN — PAGE ` OF
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTAL: PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
LEVY NO. PROJ. NO. IDENTIFICATION NO. AODN. NO. PRINCIPA LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS --- NAME -
IjION,/LgGA6 Q9§CRjf!jjQN AILING 8QDRES
1 8564 26- 119 -21 -43 -0040 89437 437.09 1 3 7037 Logan Avenue North Raymond A. & L illian B. Rice
7037 Logan Avenue North
HIPP'S EAST PALMER LAKE ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Raymond A. & Lillian B. Rice
NOTICE ALSO SENT TO: 5836 Xerxes Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
2 8564 01- 118 -21 -43 -0084 89225 381.21 16 2 5400 Camden Avenue North Douglas J. & Janine S. Krone
BELLVUE ACRES 5400 Camden Avenue North
S 112 OF LOT 16 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
3 8564 25- 119 -21 -41 -0035 90033 368.43 3 1 7230 Willow Lane North James A. Widhalm
7230 Willow Lane North
SUNNY -BROOk TERRACE Brooklyn.Center, MN 55430
i
4 8564 10- 118 -21 -32 -0039 89495 479.01 10 3 4734 Twin Lake Avenue Stanley J. Gibson
4037 Beard Avenue South
LAKEBREEZE ADDITION Minneapolis, MN 55410
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
I
�I i
13 a
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY HOOKUPS
WHEREAS, certain properties which were not previously assessed a
full share of the cost of the municipal water supply system or sanitary sewer
system have been permitted to connect to such systems; and
WHEREAS, the owner of each such property has executed an agreement
to be assessed a water and /or sanitary sewer hookup charge pursuant to City
Ordinance Section 4 -201 and Section 4 -302; and
WHEREAS, three assessment rolls, a copy of each of which is attached
hereto and made part hereof by reference, have been prepared by the City Clerk
tabulating those properties to be assessed for water over a'ten year period
and a twenty year period, and for sanitary sewer over a twenty year period,
respectively, together with the amount to be assessed to each property; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
-- the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to such proposed
assessments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Said assessment rolls of water hookup charges and sanitary sewer
hookup charges are hereby adopted and certified as the following
levies:
WATER HOOKUPS 82 -10 LEVY NO. 8558
WATER HOOKUPS 82 -20 LEVY NO. 8559
SEWER HOOKUPS 82 -20 LEVY NO. 8560
2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments over
a riod of ten ears twenty ears, and twenty Pe years, Y Y Y Years, respectively,
as indicated on each assessment roll. The first of the installments
shall be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1983,
and shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent per annum
from October 1, 1982, until the amounts have been paid in full.
To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire
assessment for fifteen months from October 1, 1982, until December
31, 1983. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added
interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of pay -
ment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be
charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the
adoption of this resolution; and hemay, at any time thereafter, pay
to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining
a- unpaid, with interest accrued to December .31 of the year in which -. such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15,
or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding
year.
t
RESOLUTION NO.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of
F this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the
proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be
collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Zhe motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted °against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PAGE I dF5
PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No. Lev No. 85
Y 58
Description: Water hookup charges to townhouse residential property Levy Description: WATER HOOKUPS 82 -10
assessed in accordance with Subdivision Agreements
between the City and the Developer. Levy runs ten years (from 1983 to 1992 )
with interest at the rate of twelve percent (__ x),
Location: First payment, with property taxes payable in 1983
k shall include fifteen whole months interest.
i
Improvement hearing date Date of Assessment Hearing September 13, 1982
Improvement ordered on Adopted on
by Resolution No. by Resolution No.
Assessment District (from Notice of Hearing): Corrections, Deletions or Deferments:
t
Method of Apportionment:
Cost Summary (from Resolution No. )
Total Improvement Cost
Less Direct City Share (Fund )
Less Other Payments
Total Assessed to Property $36,351.64
Assessed to City Owned Property NONE
Assessed to Other Public Property NONE
Assessed to Private Property $36,351.64
1
— %, I i T V I IJ11VVRLT N l.tN I tK PAGE OF -
MUNIC CODE NO 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION. ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
LEVY NO. PROD. NO. ADON. NO. LOT 113LOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME --
IDENTIFICATION N0. PRINCIPAL ADDI ION/ EGAL' Qg§C!j1ejIOj MAILING ADDRESS
1 8558 35- 119 -21 =22 -0018 01318 369.53 6 2 2932'69th 'Lane °North DeVries builders, Inc.
7564 Mariner Drive
EARLE, BROWN FARM ESTATES 1ST Minneapolis, MN 55369
Brooklyn Development Company
NOTICES ALSO SENT T0: 3250 W. 66th Street
Edina, MN 55435
2 8558 35- 119 -21 -22 -0019 01318 369.53 1 3 2936 69th Lane', North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 1st SAME AS ABOVE
3 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0012 01424 244.81 1 1 2800 67th.Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
4 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0013' 01424 244.81 2 1 2804 "67th' - Lane `North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
5 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0014 01424 244.81 3 1 2808 67th "Lane'North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
6 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0015 01424 244.81 4 ' 1 2812 67th Lane North
I�
I! EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
7 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0016 01424 244.81 5 1 2816 67th Lane North .
1 EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
8 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0017 01424 244.81 6 1 2820 67th Lane North
S EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
9 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0018 .01424 244.81 1 2 2824 67th Lane North -
j' EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
COUNCIL. ACTION NOTES °
e
9
i
f
I j
411 ! Vi omVvh61 IV WG1Y 4 r-m """' KAUa.s OF "u - m—
MUNIC CODE No. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
LEVY NO, PROD. NO. ADDN. NO. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME ---
IDENTIFICATION N0, PRINCIPAL ADDITION/6gGA6 PgSC8Iejj2b MAILING AD QRESS
10 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0019 01424 244.81 2 2 2828 67th Lane North
1
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
11 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0021 01424 244.81 4 2 2836 67th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
1 2 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0022 01424 244.81 5 2 2840 67th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
j
13 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0023 01424 244.81 6 2 2844 67th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
14 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0024 01424 244.81 1 3 2801 67th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
15 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0025 01424 244.81 2 3 2805 67th Lane North
• f
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
16 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0026 01424 244.81 3 3 2809 67th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
17 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0027 01424 244.81 4 3 2813 67th Lane North ,
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
18 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0028 01424 244.81 5 3 2817 67th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
19 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0029 01424 244.81 6 3 2821 67th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
I i
-- CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER — PAGE 4 OF 5
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
LEVY NO. PROJ. NO. ADDN. NO. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME -
IDENTIFICATION NO. PRINCIPAL ADDITIONYLEGA S AILING AQ DR
20 8558. 35- 119 -21 -23 -0031 01424 244.81 2 4 2829 67th Lane North
}
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
21 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0032 01424 244.81 3 4 2833 67th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME, AS ABOVE
1
22 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0033 01424 '244.81 4 4 2837 67th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
23 8558 35- 119 -21 -23 -0034 01424 244.81 5 4 2841 67th Lane North
i
i
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 2ND SAME AS ABOVE
24 8558 35- 119 -21 -22 -0028 01318 369,53 1 1,6 2910 68th Lane North J,. J. Barnett
I 1644 St. Croix Circle
i EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 1ST Golden Valley, MN 55422
25 8558 35- 119 -21 -22 -0029 01318 369.53 2 2914 68th Lane North
i
'I EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 1ST SAME AS ABOVE
Ij r
1 26 8558 35- 119 -21 -22 -0030 01318 369.53 3 6 2918 68th Lane North
{ EARLE BROIJN FARM ESTATES IST SAME AS ABOVE
t
27 8558 35- 119 -21 -22 -0031 01318 369.53 4 6 2922 68th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 1ST SAME AS ABOVE
28 8558 35- 119 -21 -22 -0032 01318 369.53 1 7 2926 68th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 1ST SAME AS ABOVE
29 8558 35- 119 -21 -22 -0033 01318 369.53 2 7 2930 68th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 1ST SAME AS ABOVE
{
I _ COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
s •
— CITY CENTER PAGE OF
CITY OFD —
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION'''ROLLS
PROPERTY.ASSESSEO OWNER
PROPERTY TOTAL
LEVY Na PROJ. N0. IDENTIFICATION N0. AODN. NO. PRINCIPAL LOT 'BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME -
ADDITION/ G ADDITION/LgGAL OESgR1ejI2N AILING ADDRESS
30 8558 35- _119 -21 =22 -0034 01318 369.53 3 7 2934 68th Lane North -
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES IST ., SAME AS ABOVE
31 8558 35- 119 -21 -22 -0035 01318 369.53 4 7 2938 68th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 1ST SAME. AS ABOVE
` 32 8558 35- 119 -21 -22 -0023 01318 369.53 3 4 2921 69th'Lane North Michael Fern
2921 69th Lane North
EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES 1ST Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
I �
33 8558 36- 119 -21 -22 -0037 89438• 27,145.80 2 1 Proposed HI CREST SQUARE ESTATES K.C. Bergstrom
THAT PART OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, HI Bergstrom Realty Company
CREST SQUARE LYI% E OF THE W LINE 3401 85th Avenue North
nF I OT 42 A11D Clll�. NQ 11n Brooklyn Park, MN 4
V
�3t t
i
j I
a i
4
3
i
•
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
PAGE 1 OF 2
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
r PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No. Levy No. 8559
Description: Water hookup charges to single family residential Levy Description: WATER HOOKUPS 82 - 2 0
property allowed-to connect to municipal water
system by written agreement pursuant to City Levy runs twenty years (from 1983 to 2002 )
Ordinances, Section 4 -201 with interest at the rate of twelve percent ( _12 x).
Location: First payment, with property taxes payable in 1983
shall include fifteen whole months interest.
Date of Assessment Hearing September 13, 1982
Improvement hearing date
Improvement ordered on Adopted on
by Resolution No. by Resolution No.
Assessment District (from Notice of Hearing); Corrections, Deletions or Deferments
Method of Apportionment:
Cost Summary (from Resolution No. )
Total Improvement Cost
Less Direct City Share (Fund ) s
Less Other Payments
Total Assessed to Property $3,662.00
a Assessed to City Owned Property NONE
Assessed to Other Public Property NONE
Assessed to Private Property $3,662.00
• •
MUNIC CODE N0. 22 � SPECIAL''/, " yr oRVVnL. ( v v S.e! % PAUL air
ASSESSMENT CE ,TIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTA L ADDRESS NAME
PROPERTY.ASSESSED OWNER
---
LEVY N0. PROJ, N0, IDENTIFICATION NO. ADON. N0. PRINCIPAL LOT BLOCK UNITS AD ITION/ EGA AILING ADDRESS
1 8559 01- 118 -21 -33 -0160 89365 1,690.00 7 1 5417 Fremont Avenue North Frank F. & Diane L. Lachinski
7541 Edgewood Avenue North
FAIRHAVEN PARK Minneapolis, MN 55443
2 8559 36- 119 -21 -12 -0005 89104. 490.00 20 -- 6858 Dallas Road Elmer C. & Bertha C. Herberg
PART OF LOT 20, 6858 Dallas Road'
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO, 309. Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
3 8559 26- 119 -21 -43 -0104 01362 1,482.00 2 1 2112 69th Avenue North Robert V. & Mary J. McGowan
2112 69th Avenue North
RUDENICK MAAHS ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
i
j
I
° N
i
I
i
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
I
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. ROLL PAGE I OF_,_..
PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No. Levy No. 8560
i
Description: Sanitary sewer hookup charges to single family Levy Description: SEWER HOOKUPS 82 -20
residential property allowed to connect to municipal•
sewer system by written agreement pursuant to City Levy runs twenty years (from 1983 to 2002 )
Ordinances, Section 4 -302 with interest at the rate of twelve percent ( 12 X).
Location: First payment, with property taxes payable in 1983
shall include fifteen whole months interest.
Improvement hearing date __ ' Date of Assessment Hearing September 13, 1982
Improvement ordered on Adopted on
j b
by Resolution No. y Resolution No.
Assessment District (from Notice of Hearing): Corrections, Deletions or Deferments:
Method of Apportionment:
• I
o f
Cost Summary (from Resolution No. )
Total Improvement Cost
Less Direct City Share (Fund )
E
Less Other Payments
Total Assessed to Property $1,374.16
Assessed to City Owned Property NONE
Assessed to Other Public Property NONE
Assessed to Private Property $1,374.16
I
i
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PAGE OF �..—
MUNIC CODE N0. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
OWNER
PROPERTY ASSESSED
PROPERTY TOTAL ` ADDRESS NAME -
LEVY NO. PROD. N0. IDENTIFICATION NO. ADDN. N0..: PRINCIPAL. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDITION/ EG R P MAILING DDR 5
54l7 Fremont Avenue North Frank F. & Diane L. LachinSki
7541 Edgewood Avenue North
1 8560 01- 118- 21 -33- 0160. 89365 933.00 7 1 FAIRHAVEN PARK . Minneapolis, MN 55443
2 8560 26- 119 -21 -43 -0104 01362• 441.16 2 1 2112 69th" °Avenue North. Robert V. & Mary J. McGowan
2112 69th Avenue North i
RUDENICK MAAHS ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
i
G
•
{
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
/3 3
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY ACCOUNTS TO
THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS
WHEREAS, the records of the Public Utilities Department list certain
accounts as delinquent as of July 1, 1982; and
WHEREAS, the owner of the property served by each delinquent account
has been notified of the delinquency according to legal requirements; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute, Section 444.075 and City Ordinances,
Section 4 -105 authorize certification of such delinquent accounts to the County
tax rolls for collection; and
WHEREAS an assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk tabulating
those properties where a delinquent public utility account is to be assessed
with the amount, including interest and service charges, to be assessed; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law,
the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to such
proposed assessments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Said assessment roll n utility u
1 o delinquent public uti ty acco nts is
hereby adopted and certified as Levy Noe 85570
2. The assessments as adopted and confirmed shall be placed upon the
1982 payable 1983 tax rolls by_the-Director of Finance of Hennepin
County to be paid in one annual installment with interest thereon
at eight percent per annum, for a`period of fifteen months from
Octob erl, 1982, through December 31- ,.1983.
30 The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be -
charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the
adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter,
pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment
remaining.unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year
in which such payment is made.. Such payment must be made before
November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of
the succeeding year.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit _a certified duplicate of_ -_-
this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the
proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be
collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
RESOLUTION NO.
z
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PAGE 1 OF
PROJECT INFORMATION
LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No. Levy No. 8557
Description: Delinquent public utility charges Levy Description: — DELINQUENT PUB UTIL 82
Levy runs one yearg (from 1983 to N/A )
with interest at the rate of eight percent (
Location: First payment, with property taxes payable in 1983
shad include fifteen whole months interest,
Improvement hearing date Date of Assessment Hearing September 13, 1982
Improvement ordered on Adopted on
b by Resolution No.
y Resolution No.
+.! Assessment District (from Notice of Hearing): Corrections, Deletions or Deferments;
Method of Apportionment:
ti
� v
Cost Summary (from Resolution NO. ) ,
Total Improvement Cost
Less Direct City Share (Fund )
Less Other Payments }
s
Total Assessed to Property $846.50
Assessed to City Owned Property NONE
Assessed to Other Public Property NONE
$846.50
Assessed to Private Property'
� J
i
—CITY OF BROOKLY14 CENTER PAGE =..,. OF `
I
MUNIC CODE NO 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATIO ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTAL I PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
Lk'VY NO. PROJ. N0. ADDN. NO. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME
IDENTIFICATION N0. PRINCIPAL AD /LEGA DESCRIPT O MAILING ADDRESS
1 8557 01- 118 -21 -23 -0086 89679 103.421 3 - 5754 Humboldt Avenue North Emith J. Martin
PERRON ADDITION 5754 Humboldt Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
2 8557. 01- 118 -21 -24 -0055 89405 126.10 19 -- 5740 Dupont Avenue North' Ralph C.
THAT PART OF LOT 19 LYING S OF -N 5740 Bryant Avenue North
170 FT THEREOF, EX ROAD. Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
3 --
8557 10- 118 -21 -12 -0041 89540 103.42 3 5120 Ewing Avenue North Lorraine A. Buth'
LOT 16 & S 1/2 OF LOT 17, 5120 Ewing Avenue North
LINDEN SHORES DN TWIN LAKE Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
4 8557 02- 118 -21 -44 -0133 89961 103.42 2 1 5419 "Humboldt Avenue North Lawrence Mickelson
5419 Humboldt Avenue North
ROCKWELL'S SECOND ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN ' 55430
5 8551 01- 118- 21 -33- 0075 89675 103.42 -- 1 5447 Dupont Avenue North Fred 0. Persons
} LOT 4 & N OF LOT 5 5447 Dupont Avenue North
N. & E. PERKINS ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
#: 6 8557 01- 118 -21 -33 -0104 89675 184.23 -- 2 5412, Fremont Gary Duane Anakkala
I t LOTS 21 & 22, 5412 Fremont Avenue North
N. & E. PERKINS ADDITION Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
7 8557 33- 119 -21 -22 -0050 89570 97.48 6 3 671,2 Perry Avenue North Charles D. Gram entz
6712 Perry Avenue North
MARSTAN PLACE Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
8 8557 01- 118 -21 -32 -0097 89950 25.01 4 2 5511 Emerson Avenue North Harold V. Paden
N 61.4 FT, /oo M rley Br chlin
REIDHEAD'S ADDITION 511 �merson Avenue North
Brooklyn Center MN 55430
i
r
s o
4
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
s
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER I5d
Notice is hereby give that a public hearing will be held on the day of October,
1982 at p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amend-
ment to the Zoning Ordinance rezoning certain land to the R3 classification.
ORDIMUKE NO.
A14 ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORD'INANCE'S REZONING
C EFMUN LAND TO THE R3 C I ASSIFICATICYN
ME QTY COUNCIL OF ME CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLCKS:
Section 1. Section 35 -1120 is hereby amended by the addition of
the following:
Blocks 1 through 5, Evergreen Estates Addition
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and
upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
Wopted this day of 19
Mayor
Clerk
Date of Publication
Mifective Date
(Underline .indicates --new matter_,. - brackets indicate matter. to_ be deleted. -)
a
%J
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 13th day of
September, 1982 at 8:0O p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to
consider an amendment to the City Ordinances allowing an expansion of the
hours of sale for intoxicating liquor.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REGARDING
SUNDAY SALES OF INTOXICATING LIQUORS
Section 1. Chapter 11 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn
Center is hereby amended in the following manner.
Section 11 -550 SUNDAY SALES AUTHORIZED. Notwithstanding the provisions
of Section 11 -512 of the City Ordinances, establishments to which "on sale liquor"
licenses have been issued for the sale of intoxicating liquors may, upon obtain'na..,_
a special license, serve intoxicating liquors between the hours of [12:00 noon]
10:00 a.m, and 12:00 midnight on Sundays in conjunction with the serving of food.
Wine may be sold without a special license under the authority of an "on sale
wine" license between the hours of [12 :00 noon] 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight in
conjunction with the serving of food.
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and
upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 19
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.)
t
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER �Sb
PARKS AND RECREATION
, mr777'
40K , - I,; 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Telephone 551 -5448
.waariv» uwgw
wwwrt wwa w.u.wnsa
MEMO
TO : G.G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM : Gene Hagel, Director of Parks & Recreati
DATE . September 9, 1982
SUBJECT: Playground Equipment at Marlin Park
Following the results of a neighborhood survey conducted by Park
and Recreation Commission members in May, regarding the installation
of la round equipment in Marlin Park e Commission took action
P Yg 9 t
h C
i
recommending that such equipment be installed.
There later appeared at the July 26 City Council Open Forum a neighbor
whose property adjoins the park, protesting the installation of the
equipment and citing such reasons as too few children in the neighborhood,
inaccessibility, proximity to other playgrounds, and closeness to his
property.
0 Based on this the City Council requested the Commission to again
review the subject at the next meeting of the Commission.
The Park and Recreation Commission did review the subject of equipment
installation at its meeting on August 24. Approximately twenty people
from the neighborhood were in attendance.
After receiving comments from those who wished to speak the Commission
took action reaffirming the previous decision to recommend that playground
equipment be installed in Marlin Park.
t
Note.
To date playground equipment in the amount of $2490. has been purchased,
and perimeter curbing has been installed at a cost of $1235. Total expenditure
$3725.
I personally supervised the placement of the proposed equipment. I
feel that the proximity to property lines is not a detriment to the property.
Further, the location is so placed to preserve the open space character of
the park and not restrict such activities as playing catch, kite flying,
risbee, etc.
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER RATE FOR THE ELDERLY
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER,
MINNESOTA, that a special sanitary sewer rate is hereby established for elderly
residents with the head of household or spouse 62 years of age or older and a
maximum of 2 persons in the household. The maximum limitation of 2 persons in
the household may be exceeded by any additional persons who are at least 62 years
of age or who are disabled. Persons meeting the above requirements shall file
with the City a certification on a form approved by the City. Such certification
shall be filed between September 1st and December 31st of the year preceding.
Falsification of information submitted on said certification shall constitute
a violation of Section 4 of the City Code and shall be prosecuted in accordance
with Section 4 -501 of the City Code.
The special sanitary sewer rate for all accounts billed during calendar
year 1983 shall be equal to percent ( $) of the rate
established for single family homes.
Date Mayor
i,
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by - - --
member o ,.and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
A
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: September 10, 1982
RE: Sanitary Sewer Rate Schedule For Elderly
In 1978 the City Council initiated a program for reducing the sanitary sewer
-rates paid by the elderly. The residential rates adopted at that time were as
follows:
Year Single Family Rate Elderly Rate
1979 $15.75 /quarter $8.75 /quarter
1980 $19.00 /quarter $9.50 /quarter
In September, 1980 the Council extended the special rates for the elderly through
1982. The residential rates adopted at that time were as follows:
Year Single Family Rate Elderly Rate
1981 $20.00 /quarter $10.00 /quarter
1982 $21.25 /quarter $10.50 /quarter
Because we are still awaiting the results and recommendations of the "Infiltration
and Inflow" study of the sanitary sewer system, we will not be ready to recommend
a full schedule of sanitary sewer rates until early November.
However, because the City has allowed elderly citizens to apply for the special
rate between September 1st and December 31st of the year preceding, we recommend
that a determination should be made as to whether a special rate will continue
to be offered, and if so, what percentage of the single family rate that should
be.
Attached is a summary sheet which compares actual water consumption records for
Senior Citizens to those for other single family units. Thi summary shows that
the Senior Citizen's actual water consumption, on a year -round basis is 62.5%
of the non - Senior consumption. During the non -peak (winter quarter) period, the
Senior Citizen consumption is 54.3% of the non - Senior consumption. These figures -
indicate that there is a valid basis for continuing the practice of offering
reduced rates to Senior Citizens.
Because sewer usage -is more directly related to winter - quarter usage than to
year -round usage (i.e. much of the usage during the other 3 quarters relates
to watering lawns, etc.) it is recommended that the special rate be established
' at
55% of the single family rate. However, the attached resolution leaves the
percentage blank, to facilitate discussion and determination by the City Council.
Another change incorporated into the attached resolution is the change from
requiring the applicant to file an "affidavit" to filing a "certification ".
The reason for this change is that an affidavit requires notarization of the
signature. This has caused a great deal of problem to the applicants - many
of whom have made a special trip to City Hall to have their application notarized.
In a number of cases, with disabled applicants, we have had to send one of our
employees to the applicants houses to notarize the signatures. The costs for
providing such service are certainly counter productive.
Respectfully submitted,
Sy Knap�l° �
WATER CONSUMPTION COMPARISON
SENIOR CITIZENS WATER CONSUMPTION
Time Period Units Total Gallons Gallons /Unit /Day
3RD QUARTER
July - September 1981 1,070 24,640,000 255.9
4TH QUARTER
October - December 1981 1,070 11,370,000 118.1
1ST QUARTER
January - March 1982 1,070 13,367,000 138.8
2ND QUARTER
April - June 1982 1,070 21,437,000 222.6
YEARLY 1,070 70,814,000 181.3
TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY WATER CONSUMPTION
Time Period Units Total Gallons Gallons /Unit /Day
1ST QUARTER
January - March 1981 7,015 150,265,000 238.0
2ND QUARTER
April June 1981 7,031 140,525,000 222.1
3RD QUARTER
July - 1981 7,045 223,896,000 353.E
4TH QUARTER
October' December 1981 7,063 189,596,000 298.3
YEARLY 7,039 704,282,000 274.1
BLESS SENIOR CITIZENS - 1,070 - 70,814,000
YEARLY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES CONSUMPTION 5,969 633,468,000 290.1
WITHOUT SENIOR CITIZENS
The overall total Senior Citizen consumption is approximately 62.5% of the non - Senior -
Citizen consumption.
NON -PEAK COMPARISON
Time Period Units Total Gallons Gallons /Unit /DaY
TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY CONSUMPTION
January to March 7,015 150,265,000 238..0 '
SENIOR CITIZEN CONSUMPTION
January to March 1,070 13,367,000 138.8
EStIMATED NON- SENIOR CITIZEN USAGE 5,945 136,898,000 255.86
January to March
The non -peak Senior Citizen consumption is approximately 54.3% of the non - Senior Citizen
consumption.
e i
MM MNDTR4 • 13 t
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager p
FF M: Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Tnspectiozf 70•a. .
DAM September 10, 1982
SLTSMCT: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments for the
September 13, 1982 City Council meeting
On the Septmber 13, 1982 City Council Agenda are three separate amendments to the
:- Zoning Ordinance recommended for consideration and a first reading by the City
Council. All of the matters contained in the proposed amendments were reviewed
and reecnTnended for approval by the Planning Commission during their August 26, 1982
- study meeting (copy of the minutes of that meeting are included with the City
- Council Agenda packet). The Planning Commission made five specific recommendations
for change regarding various provisions of the Zoning and Sign Ordinances which have
been incorporated into the three ordinance revisions for the City Council's con -
sideration.
Further elaboration on the specific changes and the rationale for their is in order.
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 34 AND 35 REGARDING HOM OCCUPATIONS
Consideration of this change by the Pl annin g C..caniiission can be-found on pages 1
through 3 of their August 26, 1982 minutes. The effect of this change would allow
permitted (not special) home occupations in all residential zoning districts as
accessory uses. The current ordinance allows "permitted" home occupations in the
Rl, R2 and R3 Zoning Districts and "special" home occupations, through a special
use permit, in the Rl and R2 Zoning Districts.
Over the past few years we have had a number of inquiries regarding whether or not
a perm can conduct a relatively innocuous home occupation.such as those listed in
the Zoning Ordinance in an apartment building. We also receive a number of inquir
every year regarding licensing for day care in apartment buildings. These kinds of
activities are listed in the Zoning Ordinance as home occupations and are only per -
mitted as accessory uses in the Rl, R2 and R3 Zoning Districts and, therefore,
Prohibited in the R4 through R7 districts. Such activities as an answering service,
day care, a professional office, secretarial services, hobby daft, etc., if they
are gainful occupations are prohibited under the ordinance in the R4 through R7 districts.
Jennifer Le, who lives at the Columbus Village Apartments,' appeared at the Planning
CJonuission meeting and spoke in favor of changing the ordinance, particularly to allow
licensed day care in apartments. She discussed a number of the State and County re-
quirements regarding family day care facilities.
This ordinance amendment would also limit the number of children in family day care
- facilities to ten, including children of the family, in the Rl zone (this provision
is dictated by State Law) but would limit to five the number of children including
children of the family in a family day care facility in all other residential districts.
The ordinance also acknowledges that any lease provisions which would be more re-
strictive would not be superseded by this provision of the ordinance.
i f this amendment is to be adopted, it is also recawEnded that the Sign Ordinance
Chapter 34) regarding signs for hone occupations be clarified to indi cate that
Memo to Gerald G. Splinter
Septanber 10, 1982
Page 2
home occupation signs are only permitted in the R1, R2 and R3 districts (as the
ordinance now allows) and not in the other residential districts.
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 REGARDING OUTSIDE STORAGE IN THE I - ZONING DISTRICT
The second ordinance proposal addresses the subject of limited outside storage in
the I - 1 Zoning District and was considered by the Planning Ccmnission on August 12
and August 26, 1982. Your attention is directed to page 3 of the August 26, 1982
Planning Catmission minutes.
This subject came about primarily in response to the need for outside storage at
the Municipal Garage due to consolidation efforts between the Street Department,
Park Maintenance Department and Public Utilities Division and also the necessity
to eliminate the storage yard at 69th and Dupont to accommodate some expansion of
Evergreen Park.
The Planning Cmin.ission's feelings are that such outside storage could be acceptable
in the I -1 Zoning District if it was limited to essential services and was totaL�y "
screened from view. The proposed amendment establishes, as a special use in the
I -1 zone, a classification of "non- ccrrnercial uses required for the public welfare
as determined by the City Council." Outside storage for such uses could be
authorized as an accessory use provided they are properly screened. The screening
device could have to be approved ultimately by the City Council as being aesthetically
amTpatibie with other structures and landscaping on the site. The criteria to be used
for appropriate screening would be that which is used to permit above ground or --
outside fuel storage tanks that are located throughout the industrial park currently.
The Engineering Department, after review by the City Council, is preparing plans
that include an additional storage building and a screen storage yard for the
Maintenance Garage. I
The language used in the proposed ordinance amendment is similar to the language
used in the R1 Zoning District which is the basis for allowing such things as the
Maintenance Yard, Public Utilities Building, City Hall and CcmTunity Center, and
the Fire Station in the R1 Zoning District. The City Attorney has advised us that
this is a practical and legal way to establish this limited use.
ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 REGARDING XMT_Nn M DISTRICT REQUIRM= AND SPECIAL
REQUIREMENTS IN THE C2 ZONING DISTRICT
The third ordinance proposal relates to various remanded changes and the Planning
Cmcnission's consideration and recamendations can be found on pages 3 through 5 on
their August 26, 1982 minutes.
First of all, this proposal could change the method for calculating the maximum
number of units, or density, allowed in the R4.through R7 zoning districts. Allowable-
density in multiple residential zones is based on a ratio of land area per unit. For
instance, the ordinance re in the R4 district that there be at least 3,600 sq. ft.
of land for every dwelling unit. The land area re per unit is reduced as
the Zoning District intensifies. In the R5 zone, the re is 2,700 sq. ft.
Per dwelling unit; the R6 zone re 1,800 sq. ft. per dwelling unit; and the R7
zone requires 1,400 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. In the R4 through R7 zones, the
Memo to Gerald G. Splinter
�! ' + September 10, 1982
' . Page 3
current ordinance re that the setback area of all yards abutting streets
be deducted frccn the total land area before determining the maximum number of
units allowed. This provision was adopted in about 1973 and has substantially
reduced the comber of units allowed on land within these respective zoning districts.
Since most apartment buildings in the city were built prior to this amendment they
are nonconforming uses with respect to density. This provision has also adversely
affected smaller multiple residential parcels, particularly corner parcels abutting
streets and, in many cases has reduced allowable density by 20o to 30 %. In scene
cases parcels suitable for a four -plex development can not be allowed because this
method of calculation might only allow 2.7 dwelling units on the parcel.
It should be noted that this density calculation does not affect the R3 zone and
in some cases a greater density can be permitted in the R3 zone than in the R4 zone
on similar sized parcels. There are few large vacant multiple family parcels that the
proposed change would affect, however, many smaller parcels would be affected by
going back to the original way of calculating density prior to 1973. The Planning
Commission has therefore recommended that this setback deduction be eliminated from
the Zoning Ordinance.
The proposed ordinance would also put into effect various Comprehensive Plan reccm-
motions It would increase the amount of lot width re frCM 75' to
150' in the C1 and C1A districts and from 50' to 100' in the C2 district. The
proposal would also re a minimum lot of one acre in the Cl and C1A districts
that abut major thoroughfares.
7he Comprehensive Plan also recommends a provision that would prohibit access to a
oc mercial use from a local residential street unless the City Council finds that
such access would not negatively affect the residential character of the neighborhood.
This change is also recommended as a part of the proposed ordinance.
The minimun acreage for a planned residential development (PRD) would be reduced frcan
its current 15 acres to 5 acres also as recommended by the Comprehensive Plan.
Finally this proposed ordinance would increase the required land area in the R6
Zoning District fry its current 1,800 sq. ft. per dwelling unit to 2,200 sq. ft. per
dwelling unit (or reduced the density from 2a units per acre to 20 units per acre).
This rreccnmendation is made in anticipation that the proposed Senior Citizen's Project
aright require R6 zoning to accomplish its planned development. This change has no
iMMEXUate affect because currently there is no R6 property within the City.
_p
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS r.
C S O_ THE PLANNING COMMISSIO N
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
STUDY SESSION
AUGUST 26, 1982
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Planning Commission met in study session and was called to order
by Chairman George Lucht at 7:32 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chairman George Lucht, Commissioners Molly Malecki, Nancy Manson,
Lowell Ainas, Carl Sandstrom and Donald Versteeg. Also present were
Director of Planning and Inspections Ronald Warren, Assistant City-
'. Engineer James Grube, and Planning Assistant Gary Shallcross.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1982
Commissioner Malecki pointed out that she had not been present at
the meeting and could not have moved to close the public hearing on
Application No. 82030. It was suggested that Commissioner Simmons
had made the motion.
Commissioner Simmons arrived at 7:33 p.m.
Motion by Commissioner Sandstrom seconded by Commissioner Manson to
approve the minutes of the August 12, 1982 Planning Commission meet-
ing as corrected. Voting in favor: Chairman Lucht, Commissioners
Simmons, Manson, Sandstrom and Versteeg. Voting against: none.
The motion passed.
DISCUSSION ITEMS - Draft Ordinance Amendments
a) Home Occupations
Following the Chairman's explanation, the Secretary introduced a
compilation of draft ordinance amendments, beginning with certain
amendments which would allow permitted home occupations in the R4
through R7 zoning districts. (See Draft Ordinance Amendments attached).
The Secretary briefly reviewed the definition of a Home Occupation
listed in Section. 35 -900 of the Zoning Ordinance. He explained that
under the Zoning Ordinance, uses which are not listed are prohibited.
Therefore, he went on, since home occupations are not listed as
permitted uses in the R4 through R7 zoning districts, they are
prohibited. He also noted the difference between permitted and
special home occupations. The Secretary pointed out that permitted
home occupations and special home occupations are allowed in the R1
and R2 zoning districts at present, and that only permitted home
occupations are allowed in the R3 zoning district. He explained
- -that under the draft ordinance amendment, permitted home occupations
would be allowed in Rl through R7 zoning districts and special home
occupations would only be allowed in the R1 and R2 zoning districts.
The Secretary also explained that one of the draft ordinance amend -
ments would limit the day care in multiple family districts to five
children per dwelling unit including those children living within
the dwelling unit. He also pointed out that signs advertising home
occupations would not be permitted in the R4 through R7 zoning
districts.
8 -26 -82 -1=
Chairman Lucht then recognized Mrs. Jennifer Le. Mrs. Le explained
to the Planning Commission that she recently moved to Brooklyn Center
from Duluth and that for the past two years she had been licensed by
the State for child care. She explained that the apartment that she
rents has a private entrance on the ground floor and that it faces
a playground and not a street. She stated that she felt the concerns
regarding day care in multiple family buildings were not a factor in
her case. She pointed out that, to allow her to take care of other
children in her apartment, would allow her to stay at home and take
care of her own child., She also explained that State regulations
would limit her to four other children in her apartment. Commissioner
Manson asked whether four would be allowed in this apartment only or
in any apartment. Mrs. Le explained that infants are treated dif-
ferently than toddlers and toddlers are treated differently than
preschool children under the State regulations. She explained that
State formulas allow fewer children if there are infants involved.
Commissioner Simmons stated that she agreed with the points made
by Mrs. Le and added that the ability to take children to another
place in the apartment building was important. The Secretary
acknowledged this and stated that, technically, the ordinance
prohibits even babysitting if that is a gainful occupation. He
stated that the City staff become aware of the desire to have home
day care when they receive notice from the County that a person
wishes to be licensed for day care in an apartment. He stated that
the question before the Planning Commission was whether permitted
home occupations would have any adverse impact on other apartment
units. He added that the proposed ordinance amendment would not
supersede lease arrangements which might prohibit certain home
occupations. He recommended that zones R2 through R7 be treated
alike because of party walls between dwelling untis.
There followed a brief discussion of whether apartment owners would
be notified of perspective home occupations. The Secretary stated
that the possibility of notifying the owner of the building had
been discussed by the staff. Mrs. Le pointed out that the State
licensing procedure requires that the consent of the property owner
be given before a license for day care in an apartment can be
issued. The Secretary stated that the City would still notify the
owner because the City does not wish to imply that the Zoning
Ordinance necessarily supersedes a lease agreement.
Commissioner Manson raised the question of individual music instruct-
ion as a possible problem in apartments, but added that, under City
Ordinance, noise should not be perceptible beyond the premises and
that this would be a controlling factor. The Secretary added that
owners and managers of apartments would certainly have rights and
responsibilities to control such home occupations within their
buildings. Chairman Lucht asked whether the City could require
that permission be granted by the property owner prior to engaging
in a home occupation. The Secretary explained that the permitted
home occupations would not require any City approval and that,
in general, they are so innocuous that the general public might
well be unaware of their existence. He added that the City's
Zoning Ordinance would not supersede a lease agreement if the
lease agreement were more strict than the ordinance. Chairman
Lucht stated that he had no problems with the proposed changes.
8 -26 -82 -2-
ACTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE CHANGES REGARDING HOME
OCCUPATIONS
Motion by Commissioner Simmons seconded by Commissioner Malecki to
recommend adoption of the ordinance changes regarding home occup-
ations contained in Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the draft ordinance
amendments contained in the Planning Commission agenda. Voting in
favor.: Chairman Lucht, Commissioners Malecki, Simmons, Manson,
Ainas, Sandstrom and Versteeg. Voting against: none. The motion
passed.
b) Outside Storage in the I -1 District
The Secretary then introduced draft ordinance language which would
allow outside storage of materials and equipment for noncommercial
uses in the I -1 zone. He stated that the concept had been reviewed
with the City Attorney and that the Attorney had considered the
concept legal and consistent with other provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance. The Secretary noted that Section 35 -413 would also be
amended to include the outside storage of materials in conjunction
-'with noncommercial uses required for.the public welfare provided
such storage is screened from public view with opaque materials,
similar to fuel storage facilities in the I -1 zone.
In response to a question from Chairman Lucht regarding the MTC
Bus Garage, the Secretary explained that the bus garage had been
approved as a use "similar in nature" to other uses in the I -1
zoning district. He pointed out that buses have often been left
outside on a temporary basis at the bus garage and have not been
screened. He stated that under the proposed language, MTC could
be looked at as a noncommercial use eligible for outside screening.
ACTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE LANGUAGE TO ALLOW OUTSIDE_
STORAGE OF MATERIALS FOR NONCOMMERCIAL USES IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK
- Motion by Commissioner Sandstrom seconded by Commissioner Manson to
recommend adoption of proposed ordinance language to allow for out -
side storage of materials and equipment in conjunction with non-
commercial uses required for the public welfare as contained in the
language- submitted in Sections 6 and 7 of the draft ordinance amend-
ments prepared in the Planning Commission agenda. Voting in favor:
Chairman Lucht, Commissioners Malecki, Manson, Simmons, Ainas,
Sandstrom and Versteeg. Voting against: -. none. The motion passed.
Commissioner Sandstrom asked whether the City might be setting too..
high a standard for others who may wish to engage in outside
storage in the I -1 zoning district. The Secretary stated that the
opaque screening to be used by the City would be cheaper than a
building to house the outside storage. Commissioner Simmons also -
pointed out that the action to allow outside storage in the I -1
zone was a lessening of the existing standard, not a tightening.
c) Setback Deduction in Multiple- family Districts
The Planning Assistant briefly explained the draft ordinance amend-
ment to eliminate the setback deduction from footnote l of Section,
35 -400 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Assistant stated that
the elimination of the setback deduction would only affect the
calculation of allowable density on parcels zoned R4, R5, R6, and
R7, not an elimination of the setback requirements themselves. He
also explained that other subsections of footnote 1 would be re-
lettered under the proposed language. He added that there are no
existing apartment developments which were built below the standard
8 -26 -82 -3-
which applied before the setback deduction was imposed and that,
therefore, there would not be large numbers of new apartments built
on multiple - family land in the City. The Secretary explained that
eliminating the setback deduction would greatly enhance the develop-
ment potential of small parcels of land zoned R4 or R5 in various
corner locations in the City. He mentioned the parcel at 50th and
France Avenues North as an example.
ACTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF LANGUAGE TO ELIMINATE SETBACK
DEDUCTION IN THE R4, R5, R6 AND R7 ZONING DISTRICTS
Motion by Commissioner Malecki seconded y Commissioner Ain as to
recommend adoption of ordinance language eliminating the deduction
of setback areas abutting public right -of -way on developments in the
R4, R5, R6 and R7 zoning districts for the purpose of calculating
.allowable residential density. Voting in favor: Chairman Lucht,
,Commissioners Malecki, Simmons, Manson,Ainas, Sandstrom and Versteeg.
Voting against: none. The motion passed.
d) Co mmercial District Requirements
The Secretary briefly reviewed the proposed changes.in the lot size
for Cl and ClA parcels and the lot width provisions for Cl, C1A and
C2 parcels. The Secretary explained that the proposed changes were
recommended in the City's updated Comprehensive Plan and that they
were intended to limit the number of accesses onto major thorough-
fares. The Secretary also reviewed a proposed ordinance provision
from the Comprehensive Plan which would limit or prohibit access to
C2 uses from residential streets.
ACTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION.OF LANGUAGE ALTERING THE STANDARDS FOR
LOT WIDTH AND AREA FOR COMMERCIAL USES AND LIMITING ACCESS FOR C2
. USES ONTO RESIDENTIAL ST REETS 0
Noting that the proposed ordinance language was taken from the up-
dated Comprehensive Plan, there was a motion by Commissioner Manson
seconded by Commissioner Sandstrom to recommend adoption of the
ordinance language contained in Section 1 and Section 2 of the draft
ordinance amendments in the Planning Commission agenda. Voting in
favor: Chairman Lucht, Commissioners Malecki, Simmons, Manson,
Ainas, Sandstrom and Versteeg. Voting against: none. The motion
passed.
e) Density in R6 Zone and Minimum PRD Area
The Secretary then briefly reviewed draft ordinance provisions which
would reduce the minimum area for Planned Residential Developments
to 5 acres from 15 acres and would reduce the maximum allowable
density in the R6 zoning district to 20 units per acre from 24 units
d
per acre. He explained that the reduction in the density for the R6
w
zone was related to the senior citizen's development which, it
appeared, but which the City
did
eared would be an R.6 develo , Y
PP P
e high a density as
not wish to propose at as i y permitted under the P
P P g
Zoning Ordinance currently. In answer to a question from Commis-
sioner Simmons, the Planning Assistant explained that R6 uses are
four to five stories in height.
ACTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF LANGUAGE TO REDUCE THE DENSITY IN
THE R6 ZONING DISTRICT TO 20 UNITS PER ACRE AND TO REDUCE THE
MINIMUM LAND AREA REQUIRED FOR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS
FROM 15 TO 5 ACRES
Following further brief discussion, there was a motion by Commis
sioner Versteeg seconded by Commissioner Ainas to recommend adoption
of the language pertaining to R6 density and the minimum area for
8 -26 -82 -4-
Planned Residential Developments as contained in Section 8 and
Section 9 of the draft ordinance amendments submitted in the Planning
Commission agenda. Voting in favor: Chairman Lucht, Commissioners
Malecki, Simmons, Manson, Ainas, Sandstrom and Versteeg. Voting
against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADDITIONS
_. The Secretary then briefly reviewed some technical additions which
had been made to the updated Comprehensive Plan regarding sewer use
projections, environmental policies and airport policy. The Secretary
explained that the updated Plan had not yet been adopted because the
City had sought to eliminate certain land from the Critical Area
described in the Comprehensive Plan. The Secretary explained that
this did not appear to be feasible at this time, but added that the
Critical Area regulations would have little effect on the property
in question.
ADJOURNMENT
Following a brief discussion of business items, there was a motion
by Commissioner Sandstrom seconded by Commissioner Ainas to adjourn
the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Planning Commission
adjourned at 9:13 p.m.
Chairman
-
8 -26 -82 -5-
DRAFT ORDINANCE ANENDUENTS
Section 1. Section 35 -400 is hereby mended in the following manner: ( see
table attached).
(1) In the case of residential uses, the minimiun land area shall be
cceputed and adjusted as follows:
[(a) Computation of the maximum number of units on a proposed
site in the R4,R5, R6 and R7 Districts shall be exclusive
of the aggregate area of all yard setbacks abutting streets
as required by the Zoning Ordinance for said site.]
[(b) ] (a) . . .
[(c)] (b) . . .
(d.) ] (c) . . .
[ (e) ] (d) . .
(11 Cmmercial (Cl, C1A, C2) uses abutting - major ° thoroughfares shall have
a minimum lot area of one acre.
Section 2. Section 35 -412 is hereby amended by the addition of the following:
Section.35 -412 SPECIAL REQUIREmENTs IN C2 DISTRICTS
6. Access from a local street intended primarily to serve residential
development may only be allowed upon a finding by the City Counci
that such access will not negatively affect the residentia
character of that neighborhood.
Section 3. Section 35 -405 is hereby amended in the following manner:
Section 35 -405. ADDITIONAL REQUIRENIEENTS FOR HOME OCCUPATICUS
6'. No home occupation providing day care shall serve more than ten (10)
children [who are not, members] including children of the family occupying
[the] a Dwelling Unit in the Rl District, or five (5) children
including umbers of the family occupying a Dwelling Unit in other
residential districts (R2 through R7) This subsection is not intende
to supersede any lease arrangements to the contrary
r
Section 4. Sections 35 -313, 314, 315 and 316 are hereby amended by the
addition of the following:
Section 35 -313. R4 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT.
1. Permitted Uses
(e) Home occupations as specified in Section 35 -405.
Section 35 -314. R5 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT.
1. Permitted Uses
(f) Hone occupations as specified in Section 35 -405.
Section 35 -315. R6 MULTIPLE FAt4ILy RESIDENCE DISTRICT.
1. Permitted Uses
(e) Hone occupations as specified in Section 35 -405.
Section 35 -316. R7 MULTIPLE FArffLy RESIDENCE DISTRICT.
1. Permitted Uses
(e) Home occupations as specified in Section 35 -405.
Section 5: Section 34 -140.3 of the Sign Ordinance is hereby amended in the
following manner:
Section 34- 140.3. PERMITTED SIGNS REQUIRING A PERMIT.
C. Residential (R1 through R7) Districts
(1) Hone occupations and special how occupations in the Rl, R2 and
R3 districts may have one freestanding or wall sign per dwelling,
the rkaximum size area not to exceed - 2.5 square feet and the
height above ground not to exceed six feet'.
Section 6. Section 35 -330 is hereby amended by the addition of the
following:
Section 35 -330. I -1 INDUSTRIAL PARK.
3. Special Uses
(h) Other non - commercial uses required for the public welfare as
determined by the City Council, including accessory outside
storage of materials when screened from public view by an
opaque wall.
r_
Section 7. Section 35 -413 is hereby amended in the following manner:
Section 35 -413 SPECIAL REQUIFU4R I5 IN I -1 and I -2 DISTRICTS.
9. Outdoor Storage and Activity
In the industrial park district (I -1), all production, storage, servicing,
merchandising, except off - street parking and off - street loading shall be conducted
within completely enclosed buildings.
Fuel storage or storage of materials associated with a noncommercial use
required for the public welfare which is not located within a completely enclosed
building or buried below grade shall be completely screened from view utilizing
-- earth or opaque structural materials. Said screening device shall be appropriately
landscaped and shall be aesthetically compatible with other structures and lark -
soaping on the site.
Detailed plans for said screening shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Council.
Section Section 35 -400 footnote
(1) is hereby amended in the following
manner:
(1) In the case of residential uses, the minirm land shall apply -
to each dwelling unit and shall be computed and adjusted as follows:
(e) ' Where development is contemplated in R3 R4, R5, R6 or R7 Land
Use Districts the miminum land area per dwelling unit may be
reduced, as hereinafter provided, upon a finding by the City
Council that the following standards have been met:
The amount of reduction in minimum land area requirements. shall
be calculated in terms of Density Credits. one Density Credit
shall consist of the following, respectively:
Zoning
District
One Density credit
R3 8 dwelling units per acre
R4 12 dwelling uni ts per acre
R5 16 dwelling units per acre
R6 [24] 20 dwelling units per acre
R7 31 dwelling units per acre
:Section 9. Section 35 -312 shall be amended in the following manner:
Section 35 -312. R3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT..
3. Special Uses
(a) Non- crcial uses required for the public welfare in an R3
district, as determined by the City Council.
(b) Planned residential developments conprising a variety of
dwelling modes as a special use permitted in the R3 district
subject to the following conditions:
(1) The minimum land area shall be [15] 5 acres;
(Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.)
� �= - 4 1C -0. TA3LE O I I'Mi IMUM DISTRICT REQLJE,E'�.�'IENTS. Every use of l�iic� � ^r�ti. � t��t; C ��y ci
;gall c�
to the following minimum requirements which are applicable 'to the Lard Use D�a'riec in ti,rl c:� 5u
s co: t c 1; ! a Led .
t� of - 0 e: t ever to app icaTle oo t no UL (1) Yard Setbac }: (1g)
Land •
(3) ( (2)
Area Width (2) (5) Side Side
District (Sq. ft.) (Feet) Front Rear (6) Interior Corner
R -1
One Family Dwelling (Interior Lot) 9;500 /unit 75 35 25 (9) 10 25
One Family Dwelling (Corner Lot) 10,500 /unit 90 35 -- (5) 10 25
R -2
One Family Dwelling (Interior Lot) 7,60.0 /unit 60 35 25 {9} 10 25
One Family D�- Yelling (Corner Lot) 8, 750 /unit 75 35 -- (5) 10 25
Two Family Dwelling (Interior Lot) 6,200 /unit 75 35 40' 10 25
Two Family Levelling (Corner Lot) 6,200 /unit 90 35 -- (5) 10 25
R -3 (See Sec. 35 -410)
5,400 /unit - -(7) 35 40 - -(7) 25
R -4 (See Sec. 35 -410) 3,600 /unit 100 35 40 10 25
R -5 (See Sec. 35 -410) 2,700 /unit 100 35 (4) 40 (4) 15 (4) 25 (4)
R -6 (See Sec. 35 -410) 1, 800 /unit 100 50 (4) 40 (4) 20 (4) 50 (4)
R -7 (See Sec. 35 -410) 1,400 /unit -- 50 (4) 40 (4) 20 (4) 50 (4)
11)
C -1 (See Sec. 35 -411) [75] 150 35 40' 10 25
C- IA (See Sec. 35 -4I11 - [ 75] 150 35 (4) 40 (4) 10 (4) 25 (4)
11
C -2 (See Sec. 35 -412) - -- 1 35 (4) 40 (4) 10 (4) 25 (4)
I -1 (See Sec. 35 -413) - -- 100 50 25 10 50
- -- 00 35 25 I0 i 5
C. 3 -413) �
Section 4. Section 35-315 is hereby amended by the addition of
the following: `
Section 35 - 315 .- R6 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT
1. Permitted Uses
(d) Accessory ses incidental to the for principal
rY ��J P Pal
uses when located on the same property with the use
to which it is accessory, but not including any business
or industrial uses. Such accessory uses to include
but not be restricted to the following:
(6) Hone occupations not to include special hcsne
occupations as defined in Section 35 -900
Section 5. Section 35 -316 is hereby amended by the addition of
the following:
Section 35 -316 R7 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT
1. Permitted Uses
(d) Accessory uses incidental to the foregoing principal
uses when located on the same property with the use
to which it is accessory, but not including any
business or industrial accessory use. Such accessory
uses to include but not be restricted to the following:
(6) Home occupations not to include special home
occupations as defined in Section 35 -900
Section 6. Section 34 -140.3 of the Sign Ordinance is hereby amended in
the following manner:
Section 34 140.3 PERMITTED SIGNS REQUIRING A PERMIT.
C. Residential (Rl through R7) Districts
(1) Hone occupations and special home occupations in the R R2 and
R3 districts may have one freestanding or wall sign per dwelling
the maxamun size area not to exceed 2.5 square feet and the
height above ground not to exceed six feet.
Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon
thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 19
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.)
CITY OF B1'WKL CENTER � 5 �
Notice is hereby give that a public hearing will be held on the day of October,
1982 at p.m. at the Cit-.Triail, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amend-
__. meet to the Zoning Ordinance ,)e:;tai=g to outside storage in the I - 1 zoning district.
ORDTaiANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES WITH RESPECT
TO OUTSIDE STORAGE IN THE I -1 ZONING DISTRICT
ME CITY COUPICIL OF M CITY OF BROOKLYN MFIER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLIOKS:
Section 1. Section 35 -330 is hereby amended by the - addition of
the following:
Section 35 -330 I -1 INDUSTR PARK.
3. Special Uses
(h) Other non- co- nuercial uses required for the public welfare
as determined by the City Council including - access o_y
outside storage of materials when screened fra , public viet,,
an opaque mall.
Section .2. Section 35 -413 is hereby amended in the following :manner:
Section 35 -413 SPECIAL REQUIM= IN I -1 AND I -2 DIST_aCTS.
9. Outdoor Storage and Activity
In the industrial park district (I -1), all production, storage, servicing,
ri except off - street parking and off - street loading shall be conducted
cvrithl.n ccEnpletely enclosed buildings.
Fuel storage or storage of materials associated with a nonccrraercial use --
required for the public welfare which is not located within a cca�letely enclosed
buil.aang or buried below grade shall be ccopletely screened from view utilizing
earth o;: opaque structural materials. Said screening device shall be appropriately
h landscaped and shall be aesthetically ecuipatible with other structures and land -
scaping on the site.
Detailed plans for said screening shall be suhnitted to and approved by the
City Council
Section 3. iliis ordinance shall beccme effective after adoption and upon
thirty (30) days folloeing its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 19
Mayor'
ATTEST:
Clerk
- Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Underline indicates new matter, )irackPtG ina.ic ?tP vrkat:#.P.r t� �' del Pt:erl I
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby give that a public hearing will be held on the day of October,
1982 at p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider amend-
ments to the Zoning Ordinance regarding minimum district requirements for frontage
and'land area and special requirements in the C2 Zoning District.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES WITH RESPECT
TO MCNIMUM DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIAL RDQUIRFENTS IN THE C2
ZONING DISTRICTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLIOXIS:
Section 1. Section 35 -400 is hereby amended in the following manner:
I
Section 35 -400 TABLE OF MINIMUM DISTRICT REQUIS.
Every use of land within the City of Brooklyn Center shall conform
to the following minimum re which are applicable to the
Land Use District in which such use is contemplated.
(Note: Refer to applicable footnotes) Yard Setbacks (10)
( (5) (6) (3) (5) (2)
land Area Width (2) Side Side
District (Sq. ft.) (Feet) Front Rear Interior Corner
R6 (See Sec. 35 -410) [1,800 /unit] 100 50 (4) 40 (4) 20 (4) 50 (4)
2,200 /unit
R7 (See Sec. 35 -410) 1,400 /unit 50 (4) 40 -(4) 20 (4) 50 (4)
(11)
Cl (See Sec. 35 -411) -- [75] 150 35 40 10 25
(11)
CIA (See Sec. 35 -411) -- [75] 150 35 (4) 40 (4) 10 (4) 25 (4)
C2 (See Seca 35 -412) -- [50] 100 35 (4) 40 (4) 10 (4) 25 (4)
Section 2. Section 35 -400, footnote (1) is hereby amended in the
following manner:
r
(1) In the case of residential uses, the minimum land area shall be computed
and adjusted as follows:
[ (a) mutation -of the maximum number of ` units on a proposed
site in the R4, R5, R6 and R7 Districts shall be exclusive
Of the aggregate area of all yard setbacks abutting streets
as required by the Zoning Ordinance for said site.] -
[(b)] (a) . . .
[ (c) ] (b) . . .
[ (e) ] (d) 'veere development is contemplated in Z3, R4, +5, :6 or
R7 Land �:se Districts the mini-mum land area iex duelling
unit may be reduced, as hereinafter proviced, upon a
finding by the City Council that the follcfaing standards
have been :met:
Me amount of reduction in minimum land area re
shall be calculated in terms of Density Credits. One
Density Credit shall consist of the following, respectively:
Zoning District One Density Credit
R3 3 dwelling units per acre
R4 12 dwelling units per acre
R5 16 dwelling units per acre
R6 1241 20 dwelling units per acre
R7 31 dwelling units per acre
Section 3. Section 35 -400 is amended by the addition of the followdM:
(11) Service /office (Cl, C1A) uses abutting major thoroughfares shall
have a minirnra lot area of one acre
Section 4. Section 35 -412 is hereby armed by the addition of the
following:
Section 35 -412 SPECIAL, REQUIRU= IN C2 DISTRICT'S
6. Access from a local street intended prima to serve residential
development may only be allowed upon a finding by the City Council
that such access will not negatively affect the residential
character of that nei r
ghbo hood
Section 5. Section 35 -312 shall be amended in the following manner:
Section 35 -312 R3 �uLLTIPLE FA14ILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT.
3. Special Uses
`a) Non - commercial uses re for the public welfare in an R3
district, as
, determined by the City Council.
(b) Planned residential developments ccanprising a variety of
dwelling modes as a special use perrutted in the R3 district
subject to the following conditions
(1) The minim land area shall-be [15 ] 5 acres.
Section G. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon
thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 19
Mayor
ATIE.ST:
Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Late
(Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.)
j
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
_ Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 13th day of
September , 1982 at 8 :00 p .m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway,
to consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding rezoning of certain
land.
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 RELATIVE TO REZONING
CERTAIN LA14D FROM C2 TO R3
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 35 -1190 is hereby amended by the deletion of the
following:
Section 35 -1190. COMMERCE DISTRICT (C2).
Lot [s] 1 [and 21, Block 1 , Hi Crest Square Addition.
Section 2. Section 35 -1120 is hereby amended by the addition of the
following:
Section 35 -1120 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R3).
Hi Crest Square Estates Addition
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and
upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 1982.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Brackets indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.).
�s
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 13th day of
septeMber , 1962 at s :oo p.m. at the City Hall, 5301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to
consider an amendment to the City Ordinances regulating and licensing amusement
devices.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 23 REGARDING LICENSE FEES
FOR KIDDIE RIDES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 23 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn
Center is hereby amended in the following manner:
Section 23 -010. LICENSE FEES. The fees for the various licenses shall
be.as hereinafter stated, notwithstanding other ordinance provisions regarding
the specific fee.
Fee, (annual un-
less otherwise
Type of License Required by Section License Expires stated)
Amusement Device 23 -2101 June 30
Operator $50 per machine
Kiddie Ride $10 per ri de
Vendor 150
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon
thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 19
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted).
1 64r
MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Tom Bublitz, Administrative Assistant
DATE: September 10, 1982
SUBJECT: Election Judges
Due to illness and family emergencies on the part of some of the election judges,
it is necessary to appoint additional stand -by judges for the September 14, 1982
primary. It is recommended that a motion by made by the City Council approving the
appointment of the following stand -by election judges:
Robert We Leach - DFL affiliation �.
Ann Wallerstedt - DFL affiliation
I !
TO: Gerald G. Splinter
City Manager
FROM: Brad Hoffman
Administrative Assistant „
DATE: September 10, 1982
SUBJECT: Declaration of Surplus Property
We are requesting the Council to declare two (2) vehicles as surplus
property. The vehicles will be sold at the Hennepin County Auction
on October 9, 1982. The vehicles were both replaced in the 1982 bud -
get.
1) # 29 1969 Ford F100 Pickup FlOGPH90863
2) #212 1968 Dodge A108 Panel 1962148130
cb
Licenses to be approved by the City Council on September 13, 1982 19
ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
• Brooklyn Center Jaycee Women Brooklyn Center High School
Earle Brown PTA 5900 Humboldt Avenue N.
Knights of Columbus #6772 4901 63rd Avenue N.
Sanitarian
NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
Canteen Corporation of MN 6860 Shingle Creek Pkwy.
Canteen Corporation of MN 6120 Earle Brown Drive
Canteen Corporation of MN 6700 Shingle Creek Pkwy..
Sanitarian
PERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
- Canteen Corporation of MN 6700 Shingle Creek Pkwy.
Canteen Corporation of MN 6860 Shingle Creek Pkwy.
'-- --- -- -- --- - -- Canteen Corporation of MN 6120 Earle Brown,-Drive
Sanitarian
SPECIAL FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
Marc's Budgetel 6415 James Circle n-
.
Sanitarian G
j
i
GENERAL APPROVAL:
Ae G. S rater, City Clerk