Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011 05-14 PCP PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MAY 12, 2011 REGULAR SESSION 1. Call to Order: 7:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes — April 28, 2011 4. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 5. Jeff Kauerz (Auto Zone) App. No. 2011 -010 PUBLIC HEARING — to consider a proposed Preliminary Plat approval of a new plat titled "Rainbows Garden City Second Addition" for the property generally located at the northeast corner of Brooklyn Boulevard and 63` Avenue North, and locally addressed as 6300 Brooklyn Boulevard. 6. Jeff Kauerz (Auto Zone) App. No. 2011 -011 PUBLIC HEARING — to consider Rezoning request from C -2 Commerce to PUD /C -2 Planned Unit Development /Commerce District, for property generally located at the northeast corner of Brooklyn Boulevard and 63` Avenue North, and locally addressed as 6300 Brooklyn Boulevard. 7. Mike Lambert (Allied Building) App. No. 2011 -012 To consider Site and Building Plan approval of new 76' x 175' (13,300 sq. ft.) cold- storage building in the I -2 General Industry Zone and located at 4810 Lilac Drive. 8. Final Plat Review of Shingle Creek Crossing 9. Discussion Items 10. Other Business 11. Adjournment MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION April 28, 2011 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Rahn at 7:07 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Sean Rahn, Commissioners Kara Kuykendall, Rachel Morey, and Stephen Schonning were present. Also present were Council members Carol Kleven and Dan Ryan, Secretary to the Planning Commission Tim Benetti, Director of Business & Development, Gary Eitel, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Commissioner Stan Leino, Carlos Morgan and Michael Parks were absent and excused. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MARCH 31, 2011 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to approve the minutes of the March 31, 2011 meeting as submitted. The motion passed unanimously. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Rahn explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. APPLICATION NO. 2011-008 — LOREN VAN DER SLIK FOR GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2011 -008, a request from Loren Van Der Slik for Gatlin Development Company, Inc., for Preliminary Plat Approval of Shingle Creek Crossing, which involves the replating of the Brookdale Mall properties, excluding the Sears parcel, into 19 lots and one outlot to facilitate the phased improvements and development of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. Mr. Eitel presented the staff report commenting on the background of the Planning Commission's reviews on the Shingle Creek Crossing Development concept, the provisions of the PUD ordinance, the 1999 Brookdale PUD agreement and prior public hearings scheduled to consider this redevelopment. Mr. Eitel further explained the following changes to the Preliminary Plat presented at the march 17 public hearing: -Midas and Kohl's properties have been included in the plat. 4 -28 -11 Page 1 -The developer has chosen to plat all of the lots identified in the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD at this time vs. a phased approach and that the Preliminary Plat would be reviewed first this evening followed by the PUD presentation. Mr. Eitel described how the replatting of the property creates 19 new marketable parcels and illustrated several proposed easements to be included in the replatting of the property. He indicated that a letter dated April 27, 2011 had been received from Sear's attorney, Hinshaw and Culbertson, requesting that the Commission delay any actions on these applications pending resolution of Sear's concerns and issues with the redevelopment of Brookdale Mall properties and that a copy of their letter is included in the minutes of this meeting. Chair Rahn asked about the comments related to the closing of the curb cut along Bass Lake Road that serves Kohl's as well as the box culverts within the county ditch along Shingle Creek. Mr. Eitel responded that there had been several conversations with the applicant regarding these issues and that the applicant has indicated they will close that entrance once Kohl's lease expires and after they have the authority to do so. Mr. Eitel added that the City has been working with Hennepin County on completing a study involving a full day - lighting concept of Shingle Creek. The concept involves the acquisition of land from the developer and a financial strategy to fund the improvements beyond the costs of the proposed partial day - lighting of the creek. The concept will be presented to the City Council for direction on a financial strategy and working with the developer on a plan amendment that could be considered as a Phase II modification PUBLIC HEARING — APPLICATION NO. 2011 -008 There was a motion by Commissioner Morey, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2011 -008, at 7:25 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. Frank Gatlin, Gatlin Development Company introduced himself to the Commission. Commissioner Schonning commented that he felt that the new plat, with the Midas parcel now included, looked like a much better plan than the one previously presented to the Commission. Mr. Gatlin expressed that he is close to wrapping up an agreement with Sears and incorporating them in the development plans. He added that they are also at a point where they need to wrap things up with the lender and the seller in order to move forward. He further explained that they have positioned the site so that the front of Sears can be seen from the Walmart entrance and they have added Sears to the signs on the site. Mr. Gatlin stated that they would like to keep Sears on site and have them continue to be a tenant on the site. He added that they hope to have a document executed soon with Sears that includes them in the plans and they hope for demolition to begin in June or July on the rest of the buildings. 4 -28 -11 Page 2 No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on Application No. 2011 -008. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2011 -008, at 7:30 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2011-06 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Morey, to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -06 recommending Preliminary Plat approval of Shingle Creek Crossing. Voting in favor: Chair'Rahn, Commissioners Kuykendall, Morey and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None Whereupon said resolution as declared duly passed and adopted. Planning Commission Resolution 2011 -06 is made part of these minutes by attachment. The Council will consider the application at its May 9, 2011 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. APPLICATION NO. 2011-009 — LOREN VAN DER SLIK FOR GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2011 -009, a request from Loren Van Der Slik for Gatlin Development Company, Inc., for a Planned Unit Development of the Brookdale Mall redevelopment to be known as Shingle Creek Crossing. Mr. Benetti presented the staff report describing the location of the property and the proposal. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 4 -28 -11 for Application No. 2011 -009 and the Director of Public Works memos dated 4- 25 -11, attached.) He stated that the applicant is seeking a Planned Unit Development proposal to allow the following changes to the original Brookdale redevelopment plan that includes Walmart as a major anchor: 1. The demolition of approximately 760,000 sq. ft. of the mall including the former JC Penney's, Mervyn's, Macy's and Midas stores. 2. The renovation of approximately 123,242 sq. ft. of the mall located north of Sears with architectural changes to provide exterior identity and access while maintaining an indoor mall component. 3. The planned development of a 402,489 sq. ft. community shopping center /town center that 4 -28 -11 Page 3 includes a major anchor retailer with groceries, three junior box retailers, six restaurant pad sites, and four multi- tenant retail /service buildings. 4. The day - lighting of Shingle Creek and enhancements to on -site storm water management, landscaping and lighting. Mr. Benetti described the background and history of the Planning Commission's review of the redevelopment of the Brookdale Mall site to include the following: On February 17, 2011, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 2011 -003 submitted by Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company, for a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the Brookdale C- 2 /PUD, to be known as Shingle Creek Crossing. At that time the Commission directed the preparation of a resolution approving the proposed amendment with the appropriate findings and conditions. The resolution was intended to be presented at the March 3, 2011 meeting, however, due to a lack of quorum this item was postponed until a special meeting on March 10, 2011. At said meeting, the Planning Commission unanimously adopted a resolution recommending approval of the application for a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the 1999 Brookdale C- 2/PUD, (Planning Commission Application No. 2011 -003). On March 14, 2011, the City Council accepted the Planning Commission recommendation and authorized the City Attorney to prepare the resolution and PUD development agreement for Application No. 2011 -03 submitted by Loren Van Der Slik for PUD Amendment approval to the Brookdale C -2 /PUD. On March 17, 2011, the Planning Commission reviewed Application No. 2011 -004 the Preliminary Plat for Shingle Creek Crossing, which would replat the existing Brookdale properties into four lots and two outlots to facilitate Phase I of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. This plat would exclude the existing Sears, Midas and Kohl's parcels. The Planning Commission also reviewed said Phase I development plan consisting primarily of the Walmart store development, access roads, walkways, streetscaping and lighting, along with the Architectural Design Guidelines that would govern this PUD site. The public hearing on the plat was opened and closed (without any public comments), and a secondary motion made to table this plat to the March 31, 2011 meeting to allow city staff to address a number of concerns with the applicant. The Architectural Guidelines and Phase I items were provided under a "general presentation" by the applicant, with minimal recommendations or concerns raised by the Planning Commission. On March 22, 2011, representatives from Gatlin Development (Developer) Capmark Financial (property owners), Sears and city staff met to discuss on -going issues related to the site. The Developer agreed to postpone the March 31, 2011 Planning Commission meeting for final review of the Preliminary Plat of Shingle Creek Crossing. Subsequent to this meeting, the Developer informed staff that the Midas parcel was secured for acquisition and would now be included in the PUD and plat. The Developer further agreed to withdraw the original Planning 4 -28 -11 Page 4 Commission Application No. 2011 -03 (PUD Amendment), No. 2011 -004 (Preliminary Plat) and No. 2011 -005 (Site and Building Plan). At the March 31, 2011 Planning Commission meeting, staff informed the Commission that the applications noted above have been officially withdrawn by the Applicant/Developer. Mr. Benetti described the proposed revisions to the Planned Unit Development and Site and Building plan as indicated on the plans. Benetti pointed out that each lot/building site identifies the maximum building size allowed under this PUD plan, along with specific parking areas to accommodate typical retail uses or the restaurant uses. Benetti also discussed the Architectural Design Standards and Guidelines that would govern this site, particularly Class I and Class II materials as recommended by city planning staff in the April 28, 2011 Planning Information Sheet. These classes of materials are separated out in 50% and 25% thresholds that would be applied to each respective building. Mr. Benetti added that there are additional issues related to the final plans that staff anticipates they will work out with the applicant through future discussions. Benetti added that the site and building plans being reviewed under this planning application are referenced to the proposed Walmart facility and their related improvements, plus the Phase I improvements. Commissioner Kuykendall asked for clarification about the walkway near the Midas site. Mr. Benetti responded that the east -west road between Walmart and Midas contains a lot of openings with a disconnect that doesn't complete or connect the walkway system as shown in other places on the site. They have encouraged the applicant to look at the plan further to create a safer environment for all walkways on the site that connects one pedestrian area to another. Commissioner Morey asked about comments made about further landscaping on the Walmart site, specifically the parking areas. Mr. Benetti responded that the cart corrals are spaced openly on the site which provides adequate parking for the Walmart site and if they removed a few parking spaces, they could add additional landscaping on the site. Benetti recommended that only the westerly 7 -8 rows of double - parking be considered for this added landscaping. Commissioner Kuykendall stated CUB put in anti -lock mechanism so carts could not be removed from the site. She asked how they will keep carts on the site so they don't end up off site. Mr. Benetti stated that Walmart representatives or consultants are available tonight to answer that question. PUBLIC HEARING — APPLICATION NO. 2011 -008 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2011 -008 at 8:05 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. Commissioner Kykendall asked for her questions to be responded to by the applicant. 4 -28 -11 Page 5 Mr. Will Matzek, Kimley Horn and Associates, stated that the walkway is situated such that traffic is directed to the store fronts. He stated that they have had conversations with staff and will work on an acceptable plan. Commissioner Kuykendall stated that she feels that people will walk in the area referenced even if appropriate pathways are not there and she would encourage the applicant to look at that further. Mr. Matzek responded that they prefer to keep pedestrian along the store fronts but will consider changing that on the plan if the Commission desires such a change. Ms. Jackie Cook- Haxby, SAIC Architects, stated that the carts are not kept outside but in the entrances with cart corrals on either side of the building as well as in the parking lot. The theory is that most people will return the carts and if not, staff goes out and returns the carts. Commissioner Kuykendall stated that she would like Walmart to be pro- active in making sure the carts do not end up all over the city like carts from other retail stores around the city. No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on Application No. 2011 -008. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Morey, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2011 -008 at 8:1 1p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners indicated no objections to moving this application on to consideration of approval. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2011-07 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to recommend to the City Council that it approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -07 regarding the recommended disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2011 -009, submitted by Loren Van Der Slik for Gatlin Development Company Co, Inc. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Kuykendall, Morey and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None Whereupon said resolution as declared duly passed and adopted. Planning Commission Resolution 2011 -07 is made part of these minutes by attachment. 4 -28 -11 Page 6 The Council will consider the application at its May 9, 2011 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. DISCUSSION ITEM: Luther Automotive Group — Review of updates to Planning Commission Application No. 2008- 005 (Luther Brookdale Honda & Luther Toyota City Dealerships) 6700 and 6800 Brooklyn Boulevard The Luther Company is requesting preliminary review and input to their previously approved Planning Application No. 2008 -005, which rezoned the easterly side of Brooklyn Boulevard between 1 -94 and 69 Avenue North, addressed as 6700 and 6800 Brooklyn Boulevard from C -2 (Commerce) and R -3 (Multiple Family Residence) to PUD /C -2 (Planned Unit Development/ Commerce). The application also considered the approval of a site/building plan for the new Luther Brookdale Honda dealership and the new Luther Toyota City dealership. Mr. Benetti stated that this item is being presented unofficially at this time in order to provide an update to the Planning Commission and is not being considered or reviewed under any official public hearing process. Mr. Benetti added that staff does not have any issues with this proposal since the minor modifications do not affect previous approvals. Mr. Eitel added that the final plat of the property needs to be completed. Mr. Benetti added that if the Commission chooses to do so, staff will direct the Luther group to re- submit an official Site and Building plan application which will present and consider these revisions. This matter is intended to be presented to the Planning Commission under formal application consideration at the May 26, 2011 regular meeting. Mr. Eitel stated that since approval for this development was granted in 2008, it seems appropriate to send out notices again to surrounding property owners as if there were a public hearing to notify residents. There was a motion by Commissioner Morey, and seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to recognize the consistency of the previously approved Planning Commission Application No. 2008 -005 and further review the final site plan for review and approval at the May 26, 2011 Planning Commission meeting. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Kuykendall, Morey, and Schonning The motion passed unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS: There was no other business. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:32 p.m. 4 -28 -11 Page 7 Chair Recorded and transcribed by: Rebecca Crass 4 -28 -11 Page 8 Application Filed on April 12, 2011 City Council Action must be completed by June 11, 2011 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2011 -010 Applicant: Jeff Kauerz for AutoZone Inc. Location: 6300 Brooklyn Blvd. Request: Preliminary Plat Approval of Rainbows Garden City Second Addition Meeting Date: May 12, 2011 INTRODUCTION The applicant, Jeff Kauerz for AutoZone Inc. is requesting Preliminary Plan (Plat) approval of Rainbows Garden City Second Addition. The subject site is generally located at the northeasterly corner of Brooklyn Boulevard and 63` Avenue North, addressed as 6300 Brooklyn Boulevard. This new plat will facilitate the legal separation of the former Hollywood Video and portions of the surrounding parking areas from the overall Max Sun Grocery retail center site. Two new lots will be created from this replatting; Lot 1 Block 1 and Lot 2 Block 1. The existing Walgreen's shall remain separate from this plat and under the original Rainbows Garden City Addition as Lot 1, Block 1 of said plat. Once completed, Mr. Kauerz will be able to purchase said Lot 1 Block 1 of Rainbows Second and complete the renovation to their new Auto Zone retail auto parts store at said location. Additionally, as part of the replatting of this property, two additional and separate right of way segments will be provided along Brooklyn Boulevard (County Road No. 152). This extra right of way is to ensure sufficient boulevard areas for future streetscape and trail /sidewalk improvements. ZONING The property is currently zoned C -2 Commerce District. The applicant is also requesting a rezoning of this proposed replatted area from this existing C -2 to a Planned Unit Development/Commerce (PUD /C -2) zone. This rezoning is under separate application consideration and will follow the recommendation of approval for this replatting. The specific nature or intent of this rezoning will be explained or provided in the report following the conclusion of this item's public hearing. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Land Use Element of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update identifies this site as an RB- Retail Business area. Typical commercial business, retail and office /service uses would be 5 -12 -11 Page 1 allowed in this area. No changes to the Land Use are planned or requested under this application. EASEMENT DEDICATION The dedication of additional right of way will provide up to 26 -feet of boulevard area in the area adjacent to the future Lot 1, while 41 -feet of additional right -of -way is dedicated near the northwesterly corner of the plat. The new Lot 1 will have typical 5 -ft. and 10 -ft. drainage and utility easements along the north, east and south perimeter lines of the parcel, while the westerly 1/3 of the lot will be encumbered by a drainage and utility easement, which provides easement coverage on an existing on -site drainage retention pond. Lot 2, Block 1 (MaxSun parcel) will also be provided with a large easement area for the existing drainage pond area to the east of the existing building, as well as cover for the lateral sewer lines that channel runoff from this site to the these two on -site ponding areas. Other areas of the new lots have the typical 10 -foot standard drainage utility easement along property lines adjoining public right -of -ways. The Applicant have also provided for City staff review a document tentatively labeled "Exhibit _" which provides for the shared parking and easement rights for all future users /owners of the subject site. This document will need to be fully reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and may need to be filed with the final plat. The City Engineers have also provided comments related to new easements and requested dedications in their May 4, 2011 review memorandum (attached and made part of this report). These easement requests appear to be minor in nature and should be easily accommodated on the final plat. EASEMENT VACATIONS The applicants did not indicate to city staff (at time of submittal) that they were prepared or offering any easement vacations as part of this plat approval. The City Engineers however, indicated in their review that any existing public easements that are being replaced as part of this plat process must be vacated, or those that remain must be illustrated and referenced with their individual recording document numbers. If the applicant so chooses to do this action, this should be done under separate easement vacation application and consideration filed with the City. This process may also occur at subsequent time of review and approval of the final plat. STAFF COMMENT The preliminary plat has been sent to Hennepin County Transportation Department for their review and comment. Those comments have been incorporated into the attached City Engineer's review memorandum. The additional comments and recommendations of the City Engineer/Public Works Director are also attached and referenced for final consideration in this matter. Please note some or all of 5 -12 -11 Page 2 these conditions may be made part of the proposed resolution of approval, which is attached for the Commission's review and consideration. Additionally, a public hearing has been scheduled for this preliminary plan and notice of the Planning Commission's consideration of this matter has been published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post. RECOMMENDATION The proposed preliminary plat appears to be in order and approval of the application is recommended subject to at least the following conditions: 1. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 (Platting) of the City Ordinances (attached hereto). 2. All drainage and utility easements recommended to be vacated by the City Engineer shall be vacated by ordinance amendment prior to final plat approval. 3. All easements required by the City Engineer for drainage and utility purposes shall be executed prior to final plat approval. 4. A development agreement is required that includes all conditions of the project approval, subject to the final site plan approval by the City Engineer. 5. An updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Attorney for review at the time of the final plat application (within 30 days of release of the final plat). 6. An overall easement agreement is required that will provide the City accessibility to all private utilities and storm drainage areas to inspect and enforce proper utility service and maintenance for the entire site. This easement agreement includes private inspection, maintenance and reporting responsibilities and must be executed prior to issuance of building occupancy. 5 -12 -11 Page 3 7. The plat must include dedicated easements over the following locations and existing or proposed public utility and trail /sidewalk locations, as determined by the City Engineer: a. A two foot (2') minimum sidewalk easement along the east property line along Beard Avenue, from the outside edge of the existing sidewalk. b. A two foot (2') minimum sidewalk easement along the southerly property line along 63rd Avenue, from the outside edge of the sidewalk. 8. Revise the north arrow on the preliminary plat to indicate north correctly. 9. Provide an executed copy of a shared access easement over Lot 2, Block 1 of the proposed plat for a shared driveway access onto CSAH 152 and onto 63` Avenue. A shared access agreement between the properties including Lot 1, Block 1 Rainbows Garden City First Addition must be provided prior to release of the final plat. 10. The boundary and topographic survey must show the sanitary sewer and water service and material. Please note these same conditions are memorialized in the attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -08, and may be modified as deemed necessary. 5 -12 -11 Page 4 Section 15 -104. PRELIMINARY PLAN. A. PROCEDURE 1. Before dividing any tract of land into two or more lots or parcels, an owner or subdivider shall, unless a variance is authorized, file with the city clerk. a. Four copies of the preliminary plan. b. A cash fee in an amount set forth by city council resolution. This fee will be used for the expense of the City in connection with approval or disapproval of said preliminary plat. 2. The city clerk shall then: a. Set a public hearing on the preliminary plan, such hearing to be held by the planning commission within 30 days. Notice of said hearing shall be published in the official City newspaper at least five days prior to the hearing. b. Refer two copies of the preliminary plan to the planning commission for its examination and report and one copy to the city engineer for his examination and report. Copies of the report of the city engineer shall be given to the planning commission within 15 days. 3. The planning commission shall have the preliminary plan on its agenda at its next regular meeting following referral from the city clerk. This meeting may serve as the public hearing. 4. The planning commission shall make its report to the council on or before the second regular meeting of the planning commission following referral by the city clerk. 5. The council shall act on the preliminary plan within 60 days of the date on which it was filed with the city clerk. If the report of the planning commission has not been received in time to meet this requirement, the council may act on the preliminary plan without such a report. 6. If the preliminary plan is not approved by the council, the reasons for such action shall be recorded in the proceedings of the council and transmitted to the applicant. If the preliminary plan is approved, such approval shall not constitute final acceptance of the subdivision. 5 -12 -11 Page 1 B. NECESSARY DATA FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN The preliminary plan shall be clearly and legibly drawn. The size of the map shall not be less than 12 inches by 18 inches. All subdivision maps should, if possible, be drawn at a scale of one inch equals 100 feet. The preliminary plan shall contain the following information: a. IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION 1. Proposed name of subdivision, which name shall not duplicate or be alike in pronunciation of the name of any plat theretofore recorded in the County. 2. Location by section, town, range or by other legal description. 3. Names and addresses of the owner, subdivider, surveyor and designer of the plan. 4. Graphic scale. 5. North- Point. 6. Date of preparation. b. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1. Boundary line of proposed subdivision, clearly indicated. 2. Existing zoning classification. 3. Total approximate acreage. 4. Location, widths and names of all existing or previously platted streets or other public ways, showing type, width and condition of improvements, if any railroad and utility right of way, parks and other public open spaces, permanent buildings and structures, easements, and section and corporate lines within the tract and to a distance of 150 feet beyond the tract. 5. Location and size of existing sewers, water mains, culverts or other underground facilities within the tract and to a distance of 100 feet beyond the tract. Such data as grades, invert elevations, and locations of catch basins, manholes, and hydrants shall also be shown. 5 -12 -11 Page 2 6. Boundary lines of adjoining unsubdivided or subdivided land, within 100 feet, identifying by name and ownership. 7. Topographic data, including contours at vertical intervals of not more than two feet, except that contour lines shall be no more than 100 feet apart. Water courses, marches, wooded areas, rock outcrops, power transmission poles and lines, and other significant features shall also be shown. Elevation datum shall be given in reference to U.S. Geodedic Survey, 5th General Adjustment. Topographic data shall be shown for tract and adjacent areas within 300 feet of the tract. C. SUBDIVISION DESIGN FEATURES 1. Layout of proposed streets, showing right of way widths and names of streets. The name of any street heretofore used in the City or its environs shall not be used, unless the proposed street is an extension of an already named street, in which event the name shall be used. 2. Location and widths of proposed alleys, pedestrian ways and utility easements. 3. Typical cross - sections of proposed improvements upon streets and alleys, together with an indication of the proposed storm water runoff. 4. Approximate center line gradients of proposed streets and alleys, if any. 5. Location, size and approximate gradient of proposed sewer lines and water mains. 6. Layout, number and typical dimensions of lots. 7. Minimum front and side - street building setback lines, indicating dimensions. 8. Areas, other than streets, alleys, pedestrian ways and utility easements, intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use, including the size of such area or areas in acres. d. OTHER INFORMATION 1. Statement of the proposed use of lots (type of residence, business or industry) so as to reveal the effect of the development on traffic, fire hazards or congestion of population. 5 -12 -11 Page 3 2. Proposed protective covenants. 3. Source of water supply. 4. Provisions for sewage disposal, drainage and flood control. 5. If any zoning changes are contemplated, the proposed zoning plan for the areas including dimensions. 6. If, in the opinion of the city engineer, further information is required, such information shall be furnished before the date of the public hearing. e. QUALIFICATIONS GOVERNING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAN 1. The council may require such changes or revisions as it deems necessary for the health, safety, general welfare and convenience of the City. 2. The approval of a preliminary plan by the council is tentative, only involving merely the general acceptability of the layout as submitted. 3. Subsequent approval will be required of the engineering proposals pertaining to water supply, storm drainage, sewerage and sewage disposal, gas and electric service, grading, gradients and roadway widths and the surfacing of streets by the city engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction, prior to the approval of the final plat by the City. 5 -12 -11 Page 4 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 4, 2011 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor SUBJECT: Public Works Preliminary Plat Review— Rainbows Garden City Second Addition, (AUTOZONE) Public Works Department staff reviewed the preliminary plan submittal dated April 11, 2011, for the proposed Rainbows Garden City Second Addition and have the following comments: 1. A development agreement is required that includes all conditions of the project approval, subject to the final site plan approval by the City Engineer. 2. An updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Attorney for review at the time of the final plat application (within 30 days of release of the final plat). 3. An overall easement agreement is required that will provide the City accessibility to all private utilities and storm drainage areas to inspect and enforce proper utility service and maintenance for the entire site. This easement agreement includes private inspection, maintenance and reporting responsibilities and must be executed prior to issuance of building occupancy. 4. The plat must include dedicated easements over the following locations and existing or proposed public utility and trail/sidewalk locations, as determined by the City Engineer: a. Provide a sidewalk easement along the east property line along Beard Avenue. The easement must be two (2) foot in width. b. Provide sidewalk easement along the southerly property line along 63rd Avenue. The easement must be two (2) foot minimum from the outside edge of the sidewalk. 5. All existing public easements that are prescribed to be dedicated on the final plat must be vacated. If the public easement is to remain, the easement must be shown on the preliminary and final plats with recorded document number referenced. 6. Cross access, parking and utility agreements are required between all necessary parcels. 7. Revise the north arrow on the preliminary plat to indicate north correctly. 8. Provide an executed copy of a shared access easement over Lot 2, Block 1 of the proposed plat for a shared driveway access onto CSAH 152 and onto 63 Avenue. A shared access agreement between the properties including Lot 1, Block 1 Rainbows Preliminary Plan Review Memo — Rainbow Garden City Second Addition Page 2 May 5, 2011 Garden City First Addition must be provided prior to release of the final plat. 9. Provide cross utility agreements between the properties. 10. The preferred shared access agreements should blanket the parking lot, with exception to Lot 1, Block 1, Rainbow Garden City easement. 11. The parking stalls east of AUTOZONE must be included in the shared parking access exhibit. 12. Provide a shared parking agreement showing which parking stalls are to be shared. Provide a parking study. 13. The boundary and topographic survey must show the sanitary sewer and water service and material. All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. The preliminary plan (site plan and preliminary plat) must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions above. Subsequent approval of the final plat and final site plans may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading and geometric design as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -08 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2011 -010, A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012 -010 submitted by Jeff Kauerz on behalf of AutoZone Inc. requests Preliminary Plat approval of a subdivision to be titled Rainbows Garden City Second Addition, which is a replat of Lot 2, Block 1, Rainbows Garden City Addition, located at 6300 Brooklyn Boulevard; and WHEREAS, this plat is being requested to create a separate lot for the benefit of a new AutoZone retail store and the reminder lot will be for the benefit of the existing MaxSun retail center; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on May 12, 2011 at which time a staff report and public testimony regarding the preliminary plat of Rainbows Garden City Second Addition were received; and WHEREAS, the review of this plat application has determined that the existing retail buildings and parking facilities on the proposed Lot 1 and 2, Block 1 of Rainbow Gardens City Second Addition will continue to meet zoning standards for setbacks in the underlying C -2 (Commerce) Zone; and WHEREAS, the review of this plat application is also being done in conjunction with a separate rezoning consideration under Planning Application No. 2011 -010, of which the same applicant listed herein requests rezoning from C -2 Commerce to PUD /C -2 Planned Unit Development / Commerce, and which PUD /C -2 rezoning will recognize and allow for zero lot line setbacks of shared parking facilities between the existing commercial users of this site, along with shared parking and access easement rights between these properties, and WHEREAS, the creation of this plat will provide the legal descriptions and exhibit for establishing the new zoning previously described herein, and only for those two newly created lots identified on said plat. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2011 -010 submitted by Jeff Kauerz on behalf of AutoZone Inc. be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 (Platting) of the City Ordinances (attached hereto). 2. All drainage and utility easements recommended to be vacated by the City Engineer shall be vacated by ordinance amendment prior to final plat approval. 3. All easements required by the City Engineer for drainage and utility purposes shall be executed prior to final plat approval. 4. A development agreement is required that includes all conditions of the project approval, subject to the final site plan approval by the City Engineer. 5. An updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Attorney for review at the time of the final plat application (within 30 days of release of the final plat). 6. An overall easement agreement is required that will provide the City accessibility to all private utilities and storm drainage areas to inspect and enforce proper utility service and maintenance for the entire site. This easement agreement includes private inspection, maintenance and reporting responsibilities and must be executed prior to issuance of building occupancy. 7. The plat must include dedicated easements over the following locations and existing or proposed public utility and trail /sidewalk locations, as determined by the City Engineer: a. A two foot (2') minimum sidewalk easement along the east property line along Beard Avenue, from the outside edge of the existing sidewalk. b. A two foot (2') minimum sidewalk easement along the southerly property line along 63rd Avenue, from the outside edge of the sidewalk. 8. Revise the north arrow on the preliminary plat to indicate north correctly. 9. Provide an executed copy of a shared access easement over Lot 2, Block 1 of the proposed plat for a shared driveway access onto CSAH 152 and onto 63 Avenue. A shared access agreement between the properties including Lot 1, Block 1 Rainbows Garden City First Addition must be provided prior to release of the final plat. 10. The boundary and topographic survey must show the sanitary sewer and water service and material. Date Chair ATTEST Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chair , Commissioners , and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. DGISMap Output Page Page 1 of MaxSun & AutoZone Properties L J > 0 UARI. ti ni 2! ............................. rrL ....... . ............ Z arden Park 85TH AVE N J 99L 04TH "E N_ Oar , Part; "A � 1 O' �`5 r0 �` rjr ,/ _ / ` r F PIDE RO Martin Park , ��- ��� �� � .�5� � . /,/ � � ,� rJ.� J , ��.�r� J i f �i� OH RD 63 RD AVE N Ui �""`., -_.,, .�oY �` -� z �' � i} � � — 't""".* -.pQ�� .,,,,� if c T LE I i. ..... ............................... ............ ...... . . .......... 62ND AVE N L 1 62ND AVE N JANET LN j 1 7 - Wa L Wanastad Park Planning Applicatin No. 2011-010 and 2011-011 PID:3411921420030 Of 6300 Brooklyn Blvd BROOKLYA Brooklyn Center, IVIN 55429 CENTER tp:Hgis.logis.org/LOGIS 5/10/201 1 PARKING: CHAN.. FENCE -�� \\ LNANLYK FENCE ` -W000 FENCE 1 062.5 WOOD FENCE ''IRON PPE - - - -- -- A TOZONE \ � I , 89 °58 '31 "E R I g -- I V - - -- - -- - - - - -- -- - -- -- - - � - - - - - -- - - - - - -- i - - - - -- 0 STORE #4327 1 660 -- ---- 66z-.. o %'DRAINAGE AND = - B6 E �._ T - 859 M^Y � UTIL / EA - - � - - .. ,_ -- - - I- \ `\ N SEME E✓ VIII hi- ___ 30 / � _ -- - -. j d D sp� e1P'� 1 1 �s -� � �.a .. � � ��es Ir�� \ _ /,� _'� BROOKLYN CENTER I „ rBn�j} AGEiANd _I 7 '� UDLITY £A N7m` 31 W 7185.27-- M L = - - _ 1 -� d j l ` - I . -r- _ - �- r o I S89 °58 E a 1 <1 4 ; Ex co U1/[ 71Y EfFSEMENf" 7 ��. a� a_ 1 1 -. - -- -�, - -_- -- �1 a. ce nH % CONTACT: 6 � ' NAY, r 1 i _ 10 � _ _ I I + F"rl �a- � �� + �e �a I I � ALAN CATCHPOOL R F� , I i r �''1��� �� I CEI ENGINEERING I 2277 W. Highway 36, 1 \ �'� � I Suite 200 / s m ti " NORTH I Ex. w �` �z eP , Roseville, MN 55113 V �n =ar] I1 r T / �� Phone: (651) 697 -0800 \� :.�� Fax: (651)697 -0804 0 20 40 COUNTY: i -BLDG. IEICHT ,: ELEwn.z Fr 4 I � I � H E N N E P 1 N COUNTY � E III} 1° + SEAL: LEGEND: �4`av �''t 3 EX BUILD \ ' THE MINNESOTA DOES NOT } \ \ \ A L J BLOO CR 9TRUCf ON 660 I REQUIRE IRE A A SEAL 1L l 17 �,a 1 1 6 p g # DENOTES MONUMENT SE - i G 2 O r �;'� . :` 1 - F IRST FLOOR -esa - -- , 0 0 EF i � v -6w.as 1 <��; I R 71 7 REVI AND MAwc ED Lszs e �� • DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT AS MARKED ` _ I a5 \ s DATE REVISION ® DENOTES TDENOTES FOUND \ r�l. ` 1 \ s I E I i l 1 �n i 11 -23 -10 PRELIMINARY ISSUE RIGHT OF WAY L115C ;Q ,� 1, _ I ,WWyyz II �Ir 12 -08 -10 INITIAL ISSUE OA WATER VALVE$ o:f l- a' 660 _ __ ,L'�r ��� I _ ` � Y � � ; -a.DG. �wur �U r ��" I ' C ELEV -22.9 Fr cor,;won.;ri .1 ■ HYDRANT I *d/ CATCH BASIN /STORM MM wN 1 i t J IIIrr 1 1Ig I t I p CULVERT /FJ:S.\ 1 FYY ( �f- '�� II°� �J U �� c cc �' -. m SANITARY HOLE � � - i +� i�H I � / ' � zi =a � I I � ce B CLEAN our SIGN CERTIFICATION: LIGHT unm LL UTILITY \ D C TELE /EL BOX S . - \'` 'a ", �• �y r \ per j t ° -� � `-.• N ( vvrrl I nereh' artlfv manure plan war Prepprepared! �_� - -._.. - .. E EIECTRK /eA$ METER - `,\ f-\ \ (/ \�` bij�,1N P$EM. Ip I +Ir - - . - - �' i IM me, or roarer my dined supervision, and \ z, E r I *- 1 ,7- uatlamaduIV UcemdSuneou der the laws -- GAS VA LVE UNE ��� �� ` s .11llU� �O - ee W 't {{UI \ V I° f �` I 1 / �\ � I 'i� I w I of the sate of MINNESOTA _- ._TELEPHONE LINE FIBER OPTIC LINE - �\ ` \ y \� �\ \' \ \` I \ C /- E[' u \ LQ, W l l { {{ Daniel L. Thurmes Regis anw No: 25718 ate _ -WATER UNE \ \\ \ _\ I\ \ \ \�� I ) ,- I FLOOR J / CS V W f III I I II -23 -10 R � 111 _. -STORM SEWER UNE , \ \ \ \,\ - -- ELEV-4864.24 ..,7 Er' 0� i = \\ I D SANITARY SEWER LINE " \ 1 . \ \ \ / Ft - ORO.ECT p7 Q „ l r: \ \ , „ ' - ` P 1 1NF j Lt IF. CURB . FRST FLOOR etEV-061.21 ELEV-z L0 F BLOC HE =1 \ - `- •- 6 W < - ' -.` pT ( .� ' '_1 CONCRETE _ \ ti 1 PROJECT LOCATION: 4 DENOTES SIGNIFICANT TREE J I CONTOUR INTERVAL I FOOT Yro a •f�, OF b_an) R'/ / A W 6 3 O O AREA: E wsTING BUILBUILDING 1 + OVERALL PARCEL AREA - 540,797 SO, FT. - 12.41 ACRES V �„� � � BLOC% /GLASS Ca51RUC110N \ t' '�'� BROOKLYN BLVD. _I 662 R _I I _ �, - ,� _ ` \\ _ - - - - -- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A� ; e�� a L'V - /r'/ - n 87 � �� I i PID# 3411921420030 � / e7d � f0 + First=can Title Insurance Company Commitment No. NCS- 458918 -MICR \��\ 1\T '' d \ \• � C l Ca N R't �.,.. - � � f / ( �\ 869 ��� l ._ I _ Arl 3�a3 I F 1 1 With =can date of September 26, 2010 was relled on for matters of ,� A ,� V v ?5'1 e ' ` a�T 2 �% �O e n aeo.� i A �� Rv� \ v t` Yry aye 21 v ._ F`.' t ,f;�. ce i ` 6 -- �i� record. _ ^ z • �_4rt� ^ .>4 '. A i_ ecv (vez aLarHt an aeon 66a ' 10 r Parcel A ICertlflcate of TItk No. 1140237) \ � �, I '- - .�� - " . Rainbows Garden City Addition. Property). \ i cs6'° =� 66z � 2.-I e2 -p """F -- -` ¢tC - z(�, a J 4 "�' - ____ Los 2. 91ock1 - - i - - - -- -�_�/ / --- _- - - - - - o - Ir ..a / -- INAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT - -- - �- ---� -- + Parcel B: � > ,..:. ..... . ,. - \ Non <aduM se ve eament over parts of wU , dock I, Ralnhows Garden ClCity $.AVb' A \s V - E- ,vrr - a6l - { ��� V -/ ,_ __ }' � � Addition. as contained In the declared- of Restrictions and Easemen q dated \ �, .- - - - -se rzi.V' \' - - - _.­ 1.15 o' .o- . '� 66/ EB61 Chestnut SDeet Ex ce- ca /! ti 'I_ a oN'- _• 200 SuRB #8700 December 19, 1996, recordedDecember 30, 1996, In the office of the HenneW .. _ . K. _. _ c� �.: pn -a59 06 Q. -i E -�. nr+ - i au a�a T - tlys - 1 ` s -w ._ r{1t a J `. 861_._ � Rf a e J. i `. GI, _ 3 J \ `'� \\ awl `•. s r - f` Y.. ..._ - - \ �_� = L..�I_ _ County registrar of Titles as Doc No. 2773438. ' eye vco rrar sr v r ws euLr - ___ _ - > - ' _•.__ - __ Er.. a' vcF s�erae r =~ c•: - L a �� 6 AEI�FEFER - ti V- EASEMENT NOTES: _ • ` Stillwater. MN 65oe2 < +10- \b \x9.. "ail- a_a.e� \a�R@_CUT -_ - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - - --- -. (-Gatti _uuEr) - - - -_- _ zn asai � Ph 65 .27 ¢�7 Fax 851.275.8978 - __' ca 17. Relate m Mortgages aM Leases sand are not addressed on GMs survey. All o '� \ 861 _ INDUS PUBLIC STREET) \ 060 descriptions dr reha nn the subject property. 000ggq + i 18. Subject ect t to drainage and a utility easements; as; w shown the plat of RAINBOWS GARDEN w -\ _ y B ` � 7 Ea�064. 40 CITY ADDITION. Shown grapgraphically. graphically. 1\ I 7 um 'N ?. � are m M illegible, but It appears cover e entire parod At yell as additional surrounding 19. Docent No. 522918 appear m be a survey conducted In 1957. Ports d the drawings \ ZONING A rDS B ACKS: SU UNDERGROUND UTILITY NOOTES: RVEY NOTES: BENCHMARKS: property. -FIELDWORK PERFORMED NOVEMBER 3 - 16, 2010. ,k + + T i 20. Subject to Storm sewer easement per Doc No. 573712. Shown graphically. NOVENOVEM PER THE Cm OF BROOKLYN CENTER WEBSfTE LISTED ON -LINE THE UNDERGROUND A UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM T GS STATION !10432 MBER BER 22 22, 2010. LOCATED AV HELD SURVEY INFORMATION ON AND E TINC GS. THE TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES WERE SHOT TO THE BEST OF OUR AN LOCH TED IN N 75 FT SW OF HIGHWAY 152, 275 FT SE OF 62ND E LITIFS - N. 3S FEET E OF HE CORNER OF NEW CAR SHOWROOM, IN CORNERSTONE 21. Subject to Terms D and Included In the declaration of Ions and THIS PARCEL LI ZONED C2 (COMMERCE g57RICn SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE E UNDERGROUND SEWER INVERTS WERE TAKEN AS CLOSE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE FLAGPOLE BASE (MARKED 2742 F 1979). Easement, per Doc. No. c, 277343 2773138. Not shown, affects " entire parcel. reel. IITIL171F5 SHOWN COMPROMISE All SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, STRUCTURE AS POSSIBLE. BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER D06 LANG SURVEYING, INC 22. Subject to Easement for sidewalk per Doc No. 2773439. Shown graphically. This deed FRONr: 35 FEET NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN SPOT ELEVATIONS FOR CURB LINES ARE AVAILABLE AS A POINT BLOCK ELEVATION - 861.40 (NAVD88) has a dear error In that K wmmences at the most Westerly Omer of 'Lot h d ot I % early REAR: 40 FEET THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY IN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS DRAWING. SHOTS ARE TO THE 1hoWd be calling out'wt 2'. SIDE 10 FEET THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE GUTTER UNE /EDGE OF BIT ALONG CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROJECT BENCHMARK SHOWN GRAPHICALLY ON SURVEY. CORNER: 2S FEET INFORMATION AVAILABLE MOST UTILITIES ARE SHOWN BASED ON PROJECT BEARINGS ARE ORIENTED TO THE HENNE %N COUNTY 23. Subject to Terms and condltions as contained In the agreement for maintenance and MARKING LEFT ON THE GROUND IN RESPONS TO GOPHER ONE COORDINATE SYSTEM. + Inspection of the udlNy and storm drainage systems per Doc. No. 2773440. Not Shown MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: ISO FEET LOCATE TICKET *100589918 THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY a8eas entire property. SETBACK TO RI /R2 DISTRICT FOR 2.5 STORIES BUILDING MINIMUM OF 2X THE LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF EXISTING PARKING NOTES: FILENAME SURVCE44 BUILDING HEIGHT. WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. 24. Subjett to Affidavit concerning real property contaminated h Hazardous substances ♦ PROJECT NO. CE70044 Par Doc. No. 3559616. Not shown ahem entire PoMrtv FLOOD INFORMATION: MAIN STORE PARKING: * CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI STANDARD STALLS 423 vARKPARKING OFFNED OWNER INFORMATION: BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY, THIS PROPERTY IS N ZONE HANDICAP STALLS 14 AS ALL STALLS TO THE Sam+ BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC i C PER COMMUN PANEL NO. 27053CO204E WITH AN TWIN CITY AREA 651- N54-w02 �� A D WEST OF THE PROP09ED SURVEY EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 2, 2004. TOLLFRUI 1- 800 -2S2 -1166 �.,!'a O�Yr AUTOZONE CROSS ACCESS EASE Omer of Record: BCK Enterprises, LLC, a Minnesota Ilmked liability company. STANDARD STALLS 63 AREA. HANDICAP STALLS 2 -- OHAIINK FENE1 --�\ _ _ h / rN 0 WOOD -� �t - - - -- -- - __�--� _- __ - � - - �- �ANHK - ' \ - -- - - � =5 _ - I R GARDEN N89 °58'31" - - - -t - @� FeNw woaD FENLE _ ` - s2. _ ___662. _ RAI 10 Ft. �E BIILDNG 9ETBAL% 863 '�10 -E 90E NII.DNR- 1BACK 1�1 D _ DRA /NAGf ANO - � - ��? 'ebl� 0� efio '� -�- '-_ 662 _ 999fiEfiEfiE \ 71LITY EA �_ esv ---�� 661 3D I �� �. *P � �3 .\ - CITY SECOND ADDITION FT eupNC sere - 6��� - �� �� ...... ,vIP g 6 2. -�-�? 2 _ -<-�-� A U TO Z O N E _... . t _ UALITY EA I cd� :'I i� Ili T T�- r ... ,tea.,., 8 � 589 °58'31 "W '185.27--' ; �a a�°dcz nRgh A E Anon - � I f� l .� J v. I^ w � u fiN n M : J_I - I - - - ��• 9F i ,( I 1 � iI .� �� - � � - TORE #4327 _ a, # G O A" 3� / Y( / a -- - - of D �5$/ I- �, �ti T� - - j m 1 I '� I� �T� BROOKLYN CENTER I. II -�L _I �1 ��1_Ll R- -- J nt CONTACT - y I V \r,1'f,�l ;i � , , !'� I III ALAN CATCHPOOL � � 'F ` � � � I � / X -- A �, � � �.i I ,I � CEI ENGINEERING 1�I/ ���\ V'� �� �: w �� 2277 W. Highway 36, NORTH f ,;;I I _ ,_ s \ . •\I dI {i. ' Suite 200 / >I \\ Il - - I -Y` III Roseville, MN 55113 0 20 40 1 - -- ° e EcTrc f 4�i! C �'hI Phone: (651) 697 -0800 2 V1 M ! I a . p A /:.. _ -en:- ;�f L. ; �1 Fax: (651)697 -0804 N VI., �\ - F�,3 �S ' „'f - -1 l I COUNTY• � .-L ,j'� Q i BLOG. MIGHT I �,� ELEV=22.2 FT IN ?� fi a HENNEPBN LEGEND / /�_�� II �� l COUNTY O DENOTES MONUMENT SET AND MARKED RLS 25718 e DENOTES FOUND SEALS v .�`� NC BU�DNC MONUMENT AS MARKED Ew5T \ ` \ OONSrRl1LTI0N ,\ \ , ! j `b / \ \\ „ /I/ 1 _.7- _ -� -_. _ -. J� a 2 THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DOES NOT ® DENOTES FOUND _ - ao q I REQUIRE A SEAL RIGHT OF WAY DISC ' \ 50'11 7 _ _ -FIRST FLOOR I i I t\ I YlA WATER Valves '� / \ =23 00 ' I .) �i.'- r - e" 0 � y .':� \ �l 5 - .___ '� ... ELEV= 861.35 85q a HYDRANT � ?. v - - 1 1 � I I _ u•:� � , 5� - -Y- � 1 I I - ° �� L REVISIONS: u CAT" BASIN /STO RMMH �/ �, - � -84.09 -;�- v / I �t �_ � + M �! CULVERT/F.E.S. D t9 SANITARY MANHOLE Y J .�_ I ,�yu I f ��, 12-0 DATE REVISION 8-10 PRELIMINARY ISSUE B CLEAN OUT \ �\ L Y' \ 0•`" g e6��'t \ t` A -' - 1�� l -&� 2? T -L \ I S I I I I I i i / 04 -11 -I1 RENSE LOT CONFIGURATK)N SIGN LIGHT POLE � ��� rev. - °:r �,. W�� e _ I m D TELE /ELK BOX � � � B e 71 G /GAS METER VAL _ 959 b FT. SIDE et"Ww "SETBAq( CAS vuvE '" � \ �" �v - ELECTRIC LINE \��..\ 'O.\ \�'� 1 h \ -- FTeFnoPncuN CERTIFICATION: LINE \ 2f.. ` \ \ , I FIBER LINE �\ c \ \\ \ \ \ "m \ \ \ IN P MENt ° m I I ' i_ �` _ i` \ 7 \ ::1 \ l i s l / ° ' I \' \ , " C ` ` d I _ I� T X \ \ ; �.P l l I I + by is fy t Plan was pre STORM SEWER LINE \ \ 1 / I here rU that this �v� V� _ I \ 4 a \ b me I err en net a duly m dire land se,. �peSu. p . r tene V `l A „ �j ! 4o Fr AR eLawrc rend f - - i I �� 11 ,I t duly LiceSurveyor r 3 - SANITARY SEWER LINE _ \ p I FENCE I�I� �\ \ 'f.` % /� � I 1 I:.,I EI I I' I oMer the laws of the staff of MINNESOTA. - CURBS CONCRETE DENOTES SIGNIPCANT TREE A' V�IV 1 3 + �' (. - Z ,. - MST FLOOR melLThnrmes RegN anon vim anti v I / t /- MV-864.2q woe I FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL N. �- TAT �, a 349 D94-E65.2I AREA: OVERALL PARCEL AREA - / - 5Q. FT. - 12.41 ACRES \ � I 540,797 _�T�II �`' AUrozoNE PARCEL (LDr n - 46 82 xi. Fr. _ l.oe ACRES - q6 �'� PROJECT LOCATION' REMAINING PARCEL lLOT 2) 4, % - 481 SQ. . FT. 1 I ACRES . I I.OS ACRES \ t\ \ \ 1 \ I I I ` I S$ �'� (p A SOUTHERLYROW 7,702SC FT.. 0.18ACRE$ A " -- ,7 -- \ J I NORTHERLY ROW � 8 Q. FT. 0. \ g ! / \ ` \\ \, \ .v - R � I: +f E \ 0 \ I 1 \\ CASTING BLCONG rr RI If _\ 7f �& f \ \\ \\ / � I 1 '' I I� O co CAST BLOCK /41.#M CONSi /'''"•.� �� \ \� k i 0 BLVD. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 4 / ° 60 �I I - i 1 BROOKLYN �i J r � S-, I elP i -� A •. v i so + I II KLYN B First American de I Tinsurance Company Commlust. No. NCS- 458918 -MICR with a commitment date of Se ember z6, 201 o was relied on for manors m r ecord. e7o I pea av ✓ _ 1�� ,q1T� �� �r an e7o� I 7D'. " PID# 3411921420030 _ I Parcel A (Certificate of Tlde No. 1140237) \�� �,�•� 5 s Fi. FRONT - d 1.ONC sEi�AZX 35 FT. FaONf NILONC sETBAG� 1 li' - - - - i ( Lot 2, Block I, Rainbow Carden Rainbows Cden City Addition. (Torten Property).. \\ �\ a Parcel B: be �? i< . _ ....z .- the declaration of Restrictions and Ease wt , dated Decemberc9,I 96. mc°rdedDecwn r3 � lo , .v� \ \ \,` . -, ?' : � 6' c! .- , �... )hl - - - -- _ -``' ', ... - - -' - A � ANO UT/LITY EASEMENt L _J �� t 1996, In the office of the Hennepin C my Registrar of Titles as Doc No. 2773438. i 1� \ , . „�,♦,- : ,_:. - - - - 63198 - - - - - - - _- EASEMENT NOTES: A60 I i �!I + Gas- GA, \ A., q4 It _ -_ G. s �-- - Gas- - Gam `S l - rtgages and Leases and are not addressed on this suety. All c a ri L e T!� P � Gas -- G -- G s- �- __ 10 - 17. Relate to Mo \ 5 - 1 descriptio ns reference the subject property. .. \ _ �- _ „__ -��.__ \ A (a' / \ As �_ \ �i�r - -. ,_,s. - S� -., ,as Feral Chestnut Sbeet i R _ \ - -- __. _ , ____. � er e -_zr veer A> euLr __ - �_�______ - N[L[ �_,F _!� - -� e VcF Sn (vw e, > -eLirt _�. - _ _ Stillwater, MN 55082 18. Sublecr to drainage can gr aphically. ut ility easements as shown an the plat of RAINBOWS GARDEN - - - - \ \ r \ X61 - - ------------------- - j _ �I Phone 851275.8989 nTY ADDITION. Sham gnpMcaXy. O \ \ l t�9� ?!Y ~�� 6 6 /._ '(B US P U B LIC STREET) ------ 6 60 re a cu err \ I Fax 651275.8976 sure _ _._ ............ . .- . ........... .... 19. Document No. m It 522 appears appears to cover a survey conducted M l m a Parts of the undIng s -� , \; e y = .>, --� .i HP arc Prop erty. ,lout It appears to cover the entire parcel as well ss addWklnal surrounding c 1 1 , TN N.B64A0 _ not p� t _- 1(�I 20. Subje to Storm sewer easement per Doc. No. 573712. Shown graphically. 21. Su bjentoTerms and conditionsIncluded In the declaration ofRes °lttionsand ZONING AND SETBACKS: UNDERGROUND UTILITY NOTES: SURVEY NOTES: Easement, par Doc. No. 2773438. Not sham, affect emlre parcel. + + + BENCHMARKS: sem INFORMATION PER THE CITY O BROOKLYN CENTER WEBSITE LISTED ON-UNE - FIELDWORK PERFORMED NOVEMBER 3 - 16, 2010. + 22. Subject to Easement for sidewalk per Doc. N°. 2773439. Sham graphically. Thls dead NOVEMBER 22, 2010. T UNDERGROUND INFORMATION SURVEY INFORMATION FOBSTING DRAWINGS. THE ATIO ES AND D EXIS HAVE BEEN DRAWINGS. TH FROM LOCH T GS STATION 110432 has a dew error In that k commences as the most westerly comer of lot 1'. K dearly TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES WERE SHOT TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITIES - LOCATED IN 75 FT $W OF HIGHWAY 152, 275 FT SE OF 62ND AVE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND SEWER INVERTS WERE TAKEN AS CLOSE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE N, 35 FEET E OF NE CORNER OF NEW CAR SHOWROOM, IN CORNERSTONE should be oiling out'lM 2'. THIS PARCEL IS ZONED C2 (COMMERCE DISTRICT) U71U71ES SHOWN COMPROMISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, STRUCTURE AS POSSIBLE FLAGPOLE BASE (MARKED 2742 F 1979). 23. Subject a Terms and conditions as contained In the agreement for maintenance and BUILDING SETBACK REOURtEMENTS EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES Inspection of the utility and storm drainage systems per Doc. No. 2773440. Not shown FRONT: 35 FEET NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN SPOT ELEVATIONS FOR CURB LINES ARE AVAILABLE AS A POINT BLOCK ELEVATION . 861.40 (NAVD88) LAND 5 U RV EYI NG, INC affect enure property. REAR 40 FEET THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY IN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION O THIS DRAWING. SHOTS ARE TO THE SIDE 10 FEET THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE GUTTER UNEIEDGE O BIT ALONG CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROJECT BENCHMARK SHOWN GRAPHICALLY ON SURVEY. 24. Subject to Affidavit concerning real property contaiminated with Hazardous substances CORNER: 2S FEET INFORMATION AVAILABLE MOST UTILITIES ARE SHOWN BASED ON - pa Doc No. 355 96I6. Not shown affect entire property. MARKING LEFT ON THE GROUND IN RESPONS TO GOPHER ONE PROJECT BEARINGS ARE ORIENTED TO THE HENNEPN COUNTY + MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 150 FEET LOCATE TICKET #700589918 THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY COORDINATE SYSTEM. SETBACK TO RI / K2 DISTRICT FOR 2.5 STORIES BUILDING MINIMUM OF 2K THE LOCATED T UNDERGROUN �U Y EST. ES ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF EXISTING PARKING NOTES: FILE NAME SuRVCE44 OWNER INFORMATION: BUILDING HEIGHT. + Owner of Record: BCK Enterprises. TLC, a Minnesota Iimked liability comparry. FLOOD INFORMATION: MAIN STORE PARKING: THE AUT E PARKING WILL BE PROJECT NO. CE10044 CALL BEFORE Y OU DK:I + STANDARD STALLS 423 DEFINED AS AS THE HE 9 STALLS IMMEDIATELY BY GRAPHIC ROTTING ONLY, THIS PROPERTY IS N ZONE 1 HANDICAP STALLS 14 NORTH OF AND ADJACENT TO THE 'C' PER COMMUNITY PANEL. NO. 27053CO204E WITH AN TWIN CITY AREA GS1-e54 -0002 - � BUILDIN AND THE 5 STA LLS PREU EFFECTIVE DATE O LL SEPTEMBER 2, 2004. TO FREE: 1- 900 -2S2 -1166 �. o STANDARD STALLS G• 63 THE WEST Y OF THE MAINN BUILDI AND TO PLAT AUTOZONE HANDICAP STALLS 2 ENTRANCE DRIVE A ISLE. F RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION R.T. DOC. NO. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That BCK Enterprises, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner and proprietor of following described property situated In the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: N89 ° 58'31 "E 1062.50 .. Lot 2, Block 1. Rainbows ubl Ci Ad - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 � - - - - - - - - - - - - - 773. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 69 " 44.� - - - laa2 101Z68 - - - �2 2 Fj' F1 N07-38'iO ' as musete same to be s and platted as RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION and does here 0 d,-e and dedicate to the pc for public use forever the public my and donate and dedicates the easements for o L j,BI S WA drainage and utility purposes only shown on this plat. SEW r� r I 0 S89'36'15'W -Y tG AND - "R - - - - - - - - - - UnUrY EASEME E In witness whereof said BCK Enterprises. LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has mused these presents to be , -D signed by Manager, this clay of 201 - .0 S89 W 185.2 21.17 L AINAGE AND ------ U UrY EA.ZwEhi; BCK ENTERPRISES, LLC 3CF4.27 15 ,5 65 513 /\I�� 30 -5 STATE OF CO UN TY DUN OF The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of_, 201 by co En Manager of BCK Enterprises. U.C. a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the C4 company. Notary Public, County. (Printed name) My Commission Expires it Jo A tt I Daniel L Thurmes do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a d uly Licensed Land Surveyor In the State of Minnesota; that this plat Is a correct representation of the boundary that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on the plat: that all monuments depicted on the plat have been o �v S r will be correctly set Within one year, that all "ter boundaries and wet lands, as defined In Minnesota Statutes 05.0 1 , Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and Libeled on the plat, and all public ways are shown and labeled on the plat. (A 17 ,,2350 00 I 1 75. N89 31 "E; jo 81 Daniel L Thurmes, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 25718 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WASHINGTON B L 0 C K This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 201 by Daniel L Thurmes, 256.56 N89 ----- Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 25718. 111.69 ------------ F .01 ti 0 - fw (Printed name) Notary Public, Dakota County, Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31, 201 W :2. Co BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA Camp, This plat of RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the city council of Brooklyn :1, Center, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this — day of —, 201 if applicable, the p written comments and recommendations of he Commissioner of T-sprtadw and the County Highway Engineer q6 N have been received by the city or the prescribed 30 day period has eleapsed without receipt of such comments and it recommendations, a provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. I ' ... 60 CITY COUNCIL OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WjT § -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6--=- -j" BY Mayor By - ------- Manager or Clerk em u ? 0 589 "W 789.98 o TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPAR Hennepin County. Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable In the year 201 and prior years have been paid for the land described on this plat, dated this — day of - 201 IIIII -Al ' rs...County-ft Deputy or By Depu SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota .. .. ,. .. ... \ , -, •„ I I T f Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes — 3838.565 (1969), this plat has been approval this day of ' 2011. William P. Brown, County Surveyor ey REGISTRAR OF TITM, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION was filed In this office this — day of , 2011 at o'clock _ 0 60 120 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS Michael H. Conniff, Registrar of Tides By Deputy (PLAT) Denote distance per plat of RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY ADDITION ARE SHOWN AS THUS: BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH (NO SCALE) AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, Denote: found 1 /2 Inch Iron monument UNLESS OTHERWISE SCALE IN FEET (unmarked unless noted). 5 I F NDIC EET IN NIATED TH HA D . ANNG 10 NORTH 10 10 ADJOINING RIG WAY BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ORIENTATED TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 2. BLOCK 1. 0 Denotes 1/2 Inch by 14 Inch Iron monument - L LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE BOWS set and marked RLS 25718. INDICATED AS SHOWN ON RA INBOWS GARDEN CRY WHICH IS ASSUMED To BEAR SOUTH 89 DEGREES 58 THE PLAT. MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST. CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, If-4C, Application Filed on April 12, 2011 City Council Action must be completed by June 11, 2011 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2011 -011 Applicant: Jeff Kauerz for Auto Zone Inc. Location: 6300 Brooklyn Blvd. Request: Rezoning of Property from C -2 Commerce to PUD /C -2 Planned Unit Development /Commerce District Meeting Date: May 12, 2011 INTRODUCTION The applicant, Jeff Kauerz for Auto Zone Inc. is requesting rezoning of certain properties from C -2 Commerce to PUD /C -2 Planned Unit Development/Commerce District. The subject site is generally located at the northeast corner of Brooklyn Boulevard and 63` Avenue North, addressed as 6300 Brooklyn Blvd. The portion of this property subject to this rezoning is shaped by approval or acceptance of the Rainbows Garden City Second Addition plat, which is being considered under separate application and approval by the Planning Commission. The primary purpose of this rezoning is to provide the needed flexibility to the applicant in securing adjacent (yet technically off -site) parking areas from the current owners of the MaxSun market property, allow for access easement and driveway rights between property owners, and further provide a zero lot line setback between parking facilities. The existing Walgreen's remains separate from this rezoning (as it was for the proposed plat). If this rezoning is allowed to proceed, the applicants will process and file a final plat, record any related easement documents, and afterwards complete the purchase of proposed Lot I Block 1 of Rainbows Garden City Second Addition, including the renovation to their new Auto Zone retail auto parts store. BACKGROUND INFORMATION In 1996, the City approved the redevelopment of the entire subject site by accepting a new Site and Building Plan for the new Rainbow Foods, Walgreens and Hollywood Video store. Shortly thereafter, the City also accepted a new plat separating the Walgreen's parcel from the overall 14 acre site. As part of this Plat approval, a companion Special Use Permit application was also reviewed and approved allowing Walgreen's (Lot 1) the ability to use 20 additional parking spaces in the Rainbow Foods parcel (Lot 2), which at that time had 29 extra spaces. City Council accepted all of these applications and the site continues to function on those arrangements. 5 -12 -11 Page I This shared parking and drive aisle arrangement presented by this Applicant is somewhat similar to the previous Walgreen's shared parking arrangement. However, in the Walgreen's 1996 case, and even in this current situation, what was not factored in or addressed as part of the approvals was the allowances for zero lot line setbacks for parking facilities. Under this PUD rezoning application, the City is considering allowing not only the flexibility to provide off -site parking, but also shared parking and access rights and zero lot line standards. PARKING ISSUES The subject site consists of 12.41 acres, and from this tract, a 1.08 acre parcel will be carved out to accommodate the new AutoZone owners. The existing 9,645 sq. ft. retail building remains intact, except for some minor exterior and interior improvements by AutoZone. The new lot contains up to 33 existing (marked) spaces. However, the plans submitted by the applicant indicate only the 9 spaces to the north of the store plus the 56 spaces to the immediate east, or 65 total spaces will be made available to AutoZone. The plans further call for MaxSun's owners (BCK Enterprises LLC) to provide up to an additional 18 spaces to the north of the store's front parking area, for a total of up to 83 spaces specifically for AutoZone customers and employees. The parking standards found in the Zoning Code requires 5.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area (GFA), or in this case approximately 53 spaces. The 33 marked spaces on the future AutoZone lot alone would not make this possible without some form of parking variance or waiver. However, the 65 allocated spaces easily make up this difference and staff does not feel this will take away from any of the overall parking needs of the MaxSun center, nor Walgreen's. The City Engineer, as part of his review and recommendations, included a condition of a "Parking Study." City Planning staff has conferred with the City Engineer on this matter and we are in agreement that no parking study is needed or warranted at this time; however, should the property owners, BCK Enterprises, elect to carve out more land for additional commercial /retail sites, a parking study would be warranted. ZONING The property is currently zoned C -2 Commerce District. The applicant is requesting a rezoning of the subject properties from the existing C -2 to a PUD /C -2 Planned Unit Development /Commerce District. Please keep in mind only the 12.41 acres that incorporate the MaxSun and former Hollywood Video store sites are included as part of this rezoning. No part of Walgreen's is included and shall remain as C -2 Zone. Section 35 -355 of the Zoning Ordinance provides for Planned Unit Developments (PUD) to promote flexibility in land development and redevelopment, preserve aesthetically significant and environmentally sensitive site features, conserves energy and ensures a high quality of design. The intended use of this PUD is to allow for the reduction of parking setbacks, or in this case a zero lot line setback. The use of zero perimeter setback standards will provide a seamless 5 -12 -11 Page 2 transition between parking areas and allow for the agreed upon provision for AutoZone and MaxSun properties to share and allow customers the privilege to travel freely between parking facilities. This deviation does not take away from the overall intended use of this site and the shared parking and access agreements ensure that parking remains a shared commodity and resource between these two separate commercial uses. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Land Use Element of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update identifies this site as an RB- Retail Business area. Typical commercial business, retail and office /service uses would be allowed in this area. No changes to the Land Use are planned or requested under this application. PUD APPLICATION AND REVIEW PROCESS The overall development plan and preliminary plat are attached for the Commissioner's review. The development plan and components of the future shared parking and access agreements are provided for under City Code Section 35 -355, Planned Unit Development, Subdivision 5, Application and Review (which are attached to the back of this report for your consideration). The PUD provisions require that a development include sufficient information and details which allows the evaluation of the plans to address the following criteria: 1. Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes and intent of the PUD ordinances. 2. Consistency of the Plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The impact of the Plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located. 4. The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, buffering, and landscaping. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission provide a motion recommending approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2011 -011, the Rezoning of the subject site noted herein from C -2 Commerce District to PUD /C -2 Planned Unit Development/Commerce, subject to the following conditions: 1. Completion of the platting of Rainbows Garden City Second Addition. 2. City Attorney review and approval of the submitted document labeled "Exhibit " which provides legal descriptions and illustrations of the proposed parking easements, access easements and shared access easements to serve the existing and future owners of proposed Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Rainbows Garden City Second Addition, and 5 -12 -11 Page 3 including Lot 1, Block 1 Rainbows Garden City Addition (Walgreen's). 3. Property owners shall provide an executed copy (with all affected property owners signatures) of the shared access easements and parking easements prior to release of the final plat. Said agreement must show or detail which parking stalls are to be shared. 4. Provide cross utility agreements between the properties. 5. The fifty -six (56) parking stalls (east of AutoZone) should be identified and included in the shared parking access exhibits. 6. Revise the north arrow on the preliminary plat to indicate north correctly. 7. Execution of a PUD development agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. Please note these same conditions are memorialized in the attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -08, and may be modified as deemed necessary. 5 -12 -11 Page 4 Section 35 -355. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. Subdivision 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is to promote flexibility in land development and redevelopment, preserve aesthetically significant and environmentally sensitive site features, conserve energy and ensure a high quality of design. Subdivision 2 Classification of PUD Districts, Uses, Regulations. a. Upon rezoning for a PUD, the district shall be designated by the letters "PUD" followed by the alphanumeric designation of the underlying zoning district which may be either the prior zoning classification or a new classification. In cases of mixed use PUDs, the City Council shall, whenever reasonably practicable, specify underlying zoning classifications for the various parts of the PUD. When it is not reasonably practicable to so specify underlying zoning classifications, the Council may rezone the district, or any part thereof, to "PUD - MIXED." b. Regulations governing uses and structures in PUDs shall be the same as those governing the underlying zoning district subject to the following: 1. Regulations may be modified expressly by conditions imposed by the Council at the time of rezoning to PUD. 2. Regulations are modified by implication only to the extent necessary to comply with the development plan of the PUD. 3. In the case of districts rezoned to PUD- MIXED, the Council shall specify regulations applicable to uses and structures in various parts of the district. C. For purposes of determining applicable regulations for uses or structures on land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the PUD district which depend on the zoning of the PUD district, the underlying zoning classification of PUD districts shall be deemed to be the zoning classification of the district. In the case of a district zoned PUD- MIXED, the underlying zoning classification shall be deemed to be the classification which allows as a permitted use any use which is permitted in the PUD district and which results in the most restrictive regulation of adjacent or nearby properties. Subdivision 3. Development Standards. a. A PUD shall have a minimum area of one acre, excluding land included within the floodway or flood fringe overlay districts and excluding existing rights -of -way, unless the City finds that at least one of the following conditions exists: City of Brooklyn Center 35 -1 City Ordinance 1. There are unusual physical features of the property or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a PUD will conserve a physical or terrain feature of importance to the neighborhood or community; 2. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public right -of- way from property which previously was developed as a PUD and the new PUD will be perceived as and function as an extension of that previously approved development; or 3. The property is located in a transitional area between different land uses and the development will be used as a buffer between the uses. b. Within a PUD, overall density for residential developments shall be consistent with Section 35 -400 of this ordinance. Individual buildings or lots within a PUD may exceed these standards, provided that density for the entire PUD does not exceed the permitted standards. C. Setbacks, buffers and greenstrips within a PUD shall be consistent with Section 35 -400 to 35 -414 and Section 35 -700 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted with the addition of a screening treatment or other mitigative measures. d. Parking provided for uses within a PUD shall be consistent with the parking requirements contained in Section 35 -704 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted on the grounds of the complementarity of peak parking demands by the uses within the PUD. The City may require execution of a restrictive covenant limiting future use of the property to those uses which will continue this parking complementarity, or which are otherwise approved by the City. Subdivision 4. General Standards. a. The City may allow more than one principal building to be constructed on each platted lot within a PUD. b. A PUD which involves only one land use or a single housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the purposes and objectives of this section. C. A PUD may only contain uses consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. d. All property to be included within a PUD shall be under unified ownership or control or subject to such legal restrictions or covenants as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the approved development plan and site plan. e. The uniqueness of each PUD requires that specifications and standards City of Brooklyn Center 35 -2 City Ordinance for streets, utilities, public facilities and the approval of land subdivision may be subject to modifications from the City ordinances generally governing them. The City Council may, therefore, approve streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements where it is found that such are not required in the interests of the residents or of the City, except that these subdivisions and plans must be in conformance with all watershed, state, and federal storm water, erosion control, and wetlands requirements. Subdivision 5. Application and Review. a. Implementation of a PUD shall be controlled by the development plan. The development plan may be approved or disapproved by the City Council after evaluation by the Planning Commission. Submission of the development plan shall be made to the Director of Planning and Inspection on such forms and accompanied by such information and documentation as the City may deem necessary or convenient, but shall include at a minimum the following: 1. Street and utility locations and sizes; 2. A drainage plan, including location and size of pipes and water storage areas; 3. A grading plan, including temporary and permanent erosion control provisions; 4. A landscape plan; 5. A lighting plan; 6. A plan for timing and phasing of the development; 7. Covenants or other restrictions proposed for the regulation of the development; 8. A site plan showing the location of all structures and parking areas; 9. Building renderings or elevation drawings of all sides of all buildings to be constructed in at least the first phase of development; and 10. Proposed underlying zoning classification or classifications. Such information may be in a preliminary form, but shall be sufficiently complete and accurate to allow an evaluation of the development by the City. b. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the development plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be published in the City of Brooklyn Center 35 -3 City Ordinance official newspaper and actual notice shall be mailed to the applicant and adjacent property owners as required by Section 35 -210 of this ordinance. The Planning Commission shall review the development plan and make such recommendations as it deems appropriate regarding the plan within the time limits established by Section 35 -210 of this ordinance. C. Following receipt of the recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council shall hold such hearing as it deems appropriate regarding the matter. The City Council shall act upon the development plan within the time limits established by Section 35 -210 of this ordinance. Approval of the development plan shall constitute rezoning of the property to PUD and conceptual approval of the elements of the plan. In addition to the guidelines provided in Section 35 -208 of this ordinance, the City Council shall base its actions on the rezoning upon the following criteria: 1. Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes and intent of this section; 2. Consistency of the plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; 3. The impact of the plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located; and 4. The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping. The City Council may attach such conditions to its approval as it may determine to be necessary to better accomplish the purposes of the PUD district. d. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall seek plan approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 of this ordinance. In addition to the information specifically required by Section 35 -230, the developer shall submit such information as may be deemed necessary or convenient by the City to review the consistency of the proposed development with the approved development plan. The plan submitted for approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 shall be in substantial compliance with the approved development plan. Substantial compliance shall mean that buildings, parking areas and roads are in essentially the same location as previously approved; the number of dwelling units, if any, has not increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; the floor area of nonresidential areas has not been increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; no building has been increased in the number of floors; open space has not been decreased or altered from its original design or use, and lot coverage of any individual building has not been increased or decreased by more than 10 percent. City of Brooklyn Center 35 -4 City Ordinance e. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall execute a development agreement in a form satisfactory to the City. f. Applicants may combine development plan approval with the plan approval required by Section 35 -230 by submitting all information required for both simultaneously. g. After approval of the development plan and the plan approval required by Section 35 -230, nothing shall be constructed on the site and no building permits shall be issued except in conformity with the approved plans. h. If within 12 months following approval by the City Council of the development plan, no building permits have been obtained or, if within 12 months after the issuance of building permits no construction has commenced on the area approved for the PUD district, the City Council may initiate rezoning of the property. i. Any major amendment to the development plan may be approved by the City Council following the same notice and hearing procedures specified in this section. An amendment shall be considered major if it involves any change greater than that permitted by Subdivision 5d of this section. Changes which are determined by the City Council to be minor may be made if approved by the Planning Commission after such notice and hearing as may be deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission. City of Brooklyn Center 35 -5 City Ordinance i MEMORANDUM DATE: May 4, 2011 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor SUBJECT: Public Works Preliminary Plat Review— Rainbows Garden City Second Addition, (AUTOZONE) Public Works Department staff reviewed the preliminary plan submittal dated April 11, 2011, for the proposed Rainbows Garden City Second Addition and have the following comments: 1. A development agreement is required that includes all conditions of the project approval, subject to the final site plan approval by the City Engineer. 2. An updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Attorney for review at the time of the final plat application (within 30 days of release of the final plat). 3. An overall easement agreement is required that will provide the City accessibility to all private utilities and storm drainage areas to inspect and enforce proper utility service and maintenance for the entire site. This easement agreement includes private inspection, maintenance and reporting responsibilities and must be executed prior to issuance of building occupancy. 4. The plat must include dedicated easements over the following locations and existing or proposed public utility and trail /sidewalk locations, as determined by the City Engineer: a. Provide a sidewalk easement along the east property line along Beard Avenue. The easement must be two (2) foot in width. b. Provide sidewalk easement along the southerly property line along 63rd Avenue. The easement must be two (2) foot minimum from the outside edge of the sidewalk. 5. All existing public easements that are prescribed to be dedicated on the final plat must be vacated. If the public easement is to remain, the easement must be shown on the preliminary and final plats with recorded document number referenced. 6. Cross access, parking and utility agreements are required between all necessary parcels. 7. Revise the north arrow on the preliminary plat to indicate north correctly. 8. Provide an executed copy of a shared access easement over Lot 2, Block 1 of the proposed plat for a shared driveway access onto CSAH 152 and onto 63` Avenue. A shared access agreement between the properties including Lot 1, Block 1 Rainbows Preliminary Plan Review Memo — Rainbow Garden City Second Addition Page 2 May S, 2011 Garden City First Addition must be provided prior to release of the final plat. 9. Provide cross utility agreements between the properties. 10. The preferred shared access agreements should blanket the parking lot, with exception to Lot 1, Block 1, Rainbow Garden City easement. 11. The parking stalls east of AUTOZONE must be included in the shared parking access exhibit. 12. Provide a shared parking agreement showing which parking stalls are to be shared. Provide a parking study. 13. The boundary and topographic survey must show the sanitary sewer and water service and material. All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. The preliminary plan (site plan and preliminary plat) must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions above. Subsequent approval of the final plat and final site plans may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading and geometric design as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. DGISMap Output Page Page 1 of MaxSun & AutoZone Properties - UAR es rn Cahlander Park ' ~i..... 7 ! "'•r 4 � ......................... III m y f tii$rdpn City Park jr { 85TH AVE N ,• f f �. � .. PIN.. -.� 84TH AVE ,.M`'• / E� Cc, x I C � 1 POE RD. S } Marlin Park ._...... ..... OHENRY RD �p� ,. 0 t -� t - 4 1 Ln 93RD AVE N 77(E f6.M Q Jo I CE tm FT 1 ............ ........- - ".•,I. 62ND AVE N� Z 82N DAVE N laa,s.c JANETLN '.-'' ,.,( 1 r+ /`^• # ti�,� +idit zasaoe Wan stad Park' i % 0 Planning Applicatin No. 2011 -010 and 2011 -011 In I PID:3411921420030 6300 Brooklyn Blvd B ROO K LYA Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 tp:Hgis.logis. org /LOGI S_ ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName= bc_logismap _ovsde &ClientVersion =4.0 &Form = True &... 5/10/201 Q tA 7 L -PPA' \ \ \, EXISTM AUTOZONE WALCM:ta ; RDC-N, RAW! C-YJSTNG BADINIG 81.00 .......... ---------- TTFF7M -4 i 4. i LW LOT I BLK. I CAAZPE+4, CITY W OIMN -j AD EXISTINIG BLLDNC k 00 - ------------- 0 LA 0 co X 63RD AVENUE N. M ;K z z m C) n N O M z O r. m m 0 Z 0-1 -n z m m q i O EXHIBIT ___ PROPOSED PARKING EASEMENT FROM BCK TO BENEFIT AUTOZONE (4/1 1 /1 1): An easement for parking purposes over and across that part of Lot 2, Block 1, RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 1, said Block 1, RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West, assumed bearing along the north line of said Lot 1, a distance of 16.35 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West, along said north line 81.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds East 63.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East 81.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds West 63.00 feet to the point of beginning. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS (A m n w L OT' 2 1, RAINBOWS GARDEN INV m S. LINE LOT � 1�tv LOT 1, ; BLK. I . RAIhWV/5 LA GARDEN CITY ADON SE. COR. LOT 1, BLK. 1. RAWW5 0 GARDEN CITY AWN i EXISTWC 65&j WtiI%IENTs � �;' 1 ;��: ; QM 49CK TO 7 .0 1 rn > A m eel .Z. \. - Q - 4 P 7_ , � 0 IN 'i "n, if . . . . . EXISTING en. <_ H N8.95.954' HHiM 1 1 1 BUILDWQ *!160, < 0 if r n 001 14 VRj LQTj 1 1 : z Mill IMF m 9A_ 5 I Z 06 IN ...... ........ 0 0!� n AV!�_ 111.52 � Ij AR A V\1 ;v A u v TT�o� ,N-- 9 23 *0(56 6 0 EXIST 7_11, - -------- ........... M (6 AR EASEMENTS BULDW -----PAR 50 33 FRfi�M BCK TO BENEFIT . i:6 31 TOZONE X X 00 so 68. (A r) m E. LINE LOT 1, BLK. I S895954 S. LINE LOT 2, BLK. I X 0 RAINBOWS CARDEN 5"M­ LOT 1, S �3D AVENUE N. \-I--- RAWBOWS GARDEN -i > � 0 r) ITy SECOND AMN BLK. 1, RAWBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND AWN M M Z (A m CA LA 4 LA > z > m r- m 0 c 9 - m z z N I - n 0 m z q m O EXHIBIT ___ PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT FROM BCK TO BENEFIT AUTOZONE (4/11 /11): An easement for access purposes over and across that part of Lot 2, Block 1, RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, said RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West, assumed bearing along the north line of said Lot 1, a distance of 111.52 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence North 00 degrees 01 minutes 07 seconds West 88.74 feet; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West 12.29 feet to a west line of said Lot 2; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds West, along said west line, 12.00 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West, along the south line of Lot 1, 84.09 feet; thence westerly, continuing along said south line 72.81 feet along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 175.00 feet and a central angle of 23 degrees 50 minutes 17 seconds to a westerly line of said Lot 2; thence South 18 degrees 00 minutes 54 seconds East, not tangent to last described curve and along said westerly line 12.06 feet; thence North 66 degrees 09 minutes 49 seconds East 1.22 feet; thence easterly 67.82 feet along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 163.00 feet and a central angle of 23 degrees 50 minutes 17 seconds; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East 54.39 feet; thence southeasterly 23.56 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 15.00 feet and a central angle of 89 degrees 58 minutes 48 seconds; thence South 00 degrees 01 minutes 07 seconds East 49.74 feet to the north line of said Lot 1, Block 1, RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East, along said northerly line, 27.00 feet to the point of beginning AND An easement for access purposes over and across that part of Lot 2, Block 1, RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, said RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds West, assumed bearing along the east line of said Lot 1 a distance of 38.00 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described; thence continuing South 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds West, along said east line, 24.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East 135.84 feet; thence southeasterly 23.56 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 15.00 feet and a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds West 33.26 feet; thence South 13 degrees 31 minutes 31 seconds West 47.04 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds West 68.00 feet to the south line of said Lot 2; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East, along said south line, 45.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds East 186.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West 184.84 feet to the point of beginning. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS m rn > n r, LA m rn Z CA m I P P A CCESS EASEMENTS EXISTW BU LOW O T "O ZON-I f pl N. LINE LOT 1, DLK. I CITY Ne Coe. LOT 1, BLK. 1: P qARi?r--N cirYl, 7- S00 62.00 .62 Ob 7 CWSTWL� BULOW 0 0 L3 0-3 '2 CA w rn N In 41 rn 0 z m tA rn Z rn n --j a `BL Ai�OWS GARDEN RAI�OWS GARDEN X -n > AVENUE N. () n or) Xmm tA LA Q > LA r) c > z - 4 r 0 m N 0 0 X Z -n m m O PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT FROM AUTOZONE TO BENEFIT BCK (4/11 / 1 1): An easement for access purposes over and across that part of Lot 1, Block 1, RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West, assumed bearing along the north line of said Lot 1, a distance of 111.52 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West, along said north line 27.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 01 minutes 07 seconds East 62.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East 108.50 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds West 133.00 feet; thence North 80 degrees 32 minutes 21 seconds East 30.41 feet to the east line of said Lot 1; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds East, along said east line 152.00 feet to a point 38.00 feet southerly of said northeast corner of Lot 1; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West 111.50 feet, thence North 00 degrees 01 minutes 07 seconds West to the point of beginning. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS EXHIBIT --- BEARD AVENUE N. - -------------------- - --- ........... -- ----------- --- - --------------------- _ -- i' .- .- .- .- .- . -. -- .. . ................ j NORTH _ �. __= z LU z w > - ----------- • ----- ------------- -21 1< - - - ---------------- -------------------------- ------- ----------- ----- ----- MIR I ------ ------ --- - - - -- ----- - ----------- ----- ------ ------- - ----- - ------- ------ 7 ':�; - ----- ------- ------ ----- ---- ------ - - - ------ ---- - ------ ------ -- .... ---- ------ - - - ------ --- ------ ------ ----- — ------------ 0 120 ------------ 2 .1 . -- ---- - - - -- - --- - --- ------- - -- ------ SCALE IN FEET LU of Z W tn -Q K4 Z U! S Qo m ... ....... :_.. - /�. -.,�,i / ® PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT FROM 0.1 WALGREENS TO BENEFIT AUTOZONE PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT FROM WALGREENS TO BENEFIT AUTOZONE (4/1 /11): An easement for access purposes over and across the south 12.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SHEET I OF I SHEETS � I _I.�.A�A ArA.A.AAA A _�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.��A A ♦ • . A <Ai.���� t ► t�l M ApAyA�A ® ®dA�A� ®pA�A�A���jAA� AjAjAj ►j`►jAAAAAjAA`'A`'AAA�AAA� Will ♦ / 1A AAAAAAA ®A ® A A A A A ® A A A A A A A A A A A A A A � �� ►�IA.A. ®.AwA<►AAAAl►AAAA ►AAA rArA' 'WAA�A�ArA�A`ArA`A`A�A�A�� /AAAAAAA " /AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ' ' !►AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA� AAA AAAA�A ®� ®�A�A , ► . _ ►�►AA'AA ®AAAaaA�A�AA ►_� t ►AAAAAAAAAAAA4AAA� �AAj 1! ��AAAAAAA 30.4 •' ;� ��AAAA ® A A A ® A A A ® A ® A A A A A A S A � � A /� ►A���AAAAMAAA�AAA � �jAAAjAjAjAAAjAjAAAAAAAAAA `'A�►AAAA� 45.79 . • ► A A�AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA� • " �AAj _ ►�► ®A ® A ® A ® A A A ® A ® A ® A A AAA�AAAA� � EXII ► v A a"ti A A A a A A ® A A < A ra A A A A A A A v A e � N DIALOW �j ® A� ► A� ► A A A A A A A A A�A` ► A A A� ► A A ��AAAAAAAAAAA� - �AAAAAAA� �. AAAAAAA ®�AA� AAAA� �� � � • � � � i: ® w�`�: ► A A A� r ` � � �� tl ®AAAAAAA ®A ®AAA u / A A A A' �► tl ' �1A�A�A�A�A ®A�A�A�A�A� S w F M : N , i .� A ► A�A�A�A�j �A A i �u►_v�A :A • .' '' '' % ' r N8S9 ' 5d ' 17 - W ��.►A �!► � ►AffAAA AaAAAVAA ♦AAA ► , ® ® A A A A f ► A �, A A AA .. ►AAAAAAA♦ ,. '' " ..•.. 1 EXHIBIT ___ PROPOSED ACCESS /PARKING EASEMENT FROM BCK TO AUTOZONE: An easement for access and parking purposes over and across that part of Lot 2, Block 1, RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 2; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West, assumed bearing along the south line of said Lot 2, a distance of 280.70 feet; thence North 04 degrees 32 minutes 31 seconds East 15.62 feet; thence northeasterly 132.53 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 100.00 feet and a central angle of 75 degrees 55 minutes 56 seconds; thence North 80 degrees 28 minutes 27 seconds East 8.14 feet; thence northeasterly 140.38 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 100.00 feet and a central angle of 80 degrees 25 minutes 55 seconds; thence North 00 degrees 02 minutes 33 seconds East 357.86 feet; thence northwesterly 78.55 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 50.00 feet and a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 33 seconds; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 01 seconds West 792.57 feet; thence westerly 84.11 feet along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 200.00 feet and a central angle of 24 degrees 05 minutes 41 seconds; thence South 66 degrees 16 minutes 34 seconds West 50.34 feet to a west line of said Lot 2; thence South 23 degrees 50 minutes 20 seconds East, along said westerly line, 46.57 feet; thence North 64 degrees 47 minutes 14 seconds East 122.77 feet; thence North 89 degrees 51 minutes 35 seconds East 162.65 feet; thence southeasterly 13.94 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 15.00 feet and a central angle of 53 degrees 14 minutes 50 seconds; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East, not tangent to last described curve, 14.49 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds West 268.25 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East 12.29 feet; thence South 00 degrees 01 minutes 07 seconds East 25.74 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East 95.19 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds West 63.00 feet to the north line of Lot 1, Block 1, RAINBOWS GARDEN CITY SECOND ADDITION; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East, along said north line, 16.35 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds West, along the east line of said Lot 1 a distance of 38.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East 184.84 feet; thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 40 seconds East 385.69 feet; thence northeasterly 23.51 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 15.00 feet and a central angle of 89 degrees 48 minutes 25 seconds; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 05 seconds East 243.66 feet; thence southeasterly 23.55 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 15.00 feet and a central angle of 89 degrees 57 minutes 42 seconds; thence South 00 degrees 04 minutes 14 seconds East 124.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 39 minutes 25 seconds East 30.46 feet; thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 19 seconds West 128.91 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 58 seconds West 45.79 feet; thence South 00 degrees 06 minutes 47 seconds West 89.21 feet; thence South 89 degrees 49 minutes 56 seconds West 89.24 feet; thence South 00 degrees 17 minutes 58 seconds East 106.20 feet; thence North 89 degrees 58 minutes 17 seconds West 155.07 feet; thence South 00 degrees 55 minutes 13 seconds East 15.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West 15.61 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds West 32.41 feet; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East 16.54 feet; thence South 00 degrees 37 minutes 49 seconds East 38.00 feet; thence southeasterly 31.21 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 20.00 feet and a central angle of 89 degrees 24 minutes 20 seconds; thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 51 seconds East 93.00 feet; thence South 15 degrees 00 minutes 54 seconds East 19.00 feet to the south line of said Lot 2; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East, along said south line 31.55 feet to the point of beginning. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS � � I 'n ....:.�. - .- ...,. �i�� J.a. •...♦ ♦...... ��....♦ Y;.1... f:... ...... �. ...A t.. f � �. w ♦ .A r. I � ,_, , yam � � '�► � � _...! Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -09 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2011 -011 SUBMITTED BY JEFF KAUERZ ON BEHALF OF AUTOZONE INC. WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2011 -011 submitted by Jeff Kauerz on behalf of AutoZone Inc. proposes rezoning from C -2 (Commerce) to PUD /C -2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce) of a 12.41 acre lot; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends the rezoning of the above mentioned property to provide flexibility in the establishment of shared parking and access easement rights across property lines, plus allowance of a zero -lot line setback between parking facilities; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on May 12, 2011 when a staff report and public testimony regarding the rezoning, overall development plan and access easement documents with legal descriptions and illustrations demonstrating the shared parking and access easements were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezoning contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit Development ordinance contained in Section 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2011 -011 submitted by Jeff Kauerz on behalf of AutoZone Inc. be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The Planned Unit Development is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the Planned Unit Development Rezoning is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform to ordinance standards established by the underlying C -2 Zone. These modifications from the C -2 standards are justified on the basis of the development being an 1 appropriate sharing of parking resources and facilities between these properties and the commercial uses for this area. Furthermore, this PUD offsets or mitigates the requirements of installing physical separators or improvements that may impede normal, orderly and seamless transition between properties by customer vehicles and pedestrians. 4. The Planned Unit Development proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 5. The Planned Unit Development proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this development can be considered an asset to the community. 6. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating rezoning as contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2011 -011 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. Completion of the platting of Rainbows Garden City Second Addition. 2. City Attorney review and approval of the submitted document labeled "Exhibit which provides legal descriptions and illustrations of the proposed parking easements, access easements and shared access easements to serve the existing and future owners of proposed Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Rainbows Garden City Second Addition, and including Lot 1, Block 1 Rainbows Garden City Addition (Walgreen's). 3. Property owners shall provide an executed copy (with all affected property owners signatures) of the shared access easements and parking easements prior to release of the final plat. Said agreement must show or detail which parking stalls are to be shared. 4. Provide cross utility agreements between the properties. 5. The fifty -six (56) parking stalls (east of AutoZone) should be identified and included in the shared parking access exhibits. 6. Revise the north arrow on the preliminary plat to indicate north correctly. 7. Execution of a PUD development agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. 2 Date Chair ATTEST Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chair Commissioners and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 3 Application Filed on April 18, 2011 City Council Action must be completed by June 17, 2011 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2011 -012 Applicant: Mike Lambert, Allied Building Products, Inc. Location: 4810 Lilac Drive North Request: Site and Building Plan Review for a 13,300 sq. ft. storage building Meeting Date: May 12, 2011 INTRODUCTION The applicant, Mike Lambert, Operations Manager of Allied Building Products, Inc. is requesting site and building plan approval to facilitate the construction of a 76' x 175' (13,300 sq. ft.) cold storage building. The new building would be used for the storage of raw and finished building products typically provided for or sold (wholesale) to Allied customers. The site plan provided by the Applicant illustrates the location of the building within the northwestern portion of the 6.5 acre office /warehouse site. Access to the building will be provided by large, overhead doors on each end, with main access from the interior of the storage yard and the far northwesterly entrance. BACKGROUND INFORMATION A review of the property file on this original site demonstrates a number of different site and building plans, along with a special use permit for off -site parking provisions. The principal building located near the main entrance is used for Allied Building offices (19,266 sq. ft. ) plus 26,000 sq. ft. of interior warehouse /storage. The site also contains five other "storage buildings" consisting of over 30,000 combined sq. ft. of storage space, along with a small (784 sq. ft.) garage. The last site/building plan approval was completed in 1987 involved the installation of the 110' x 150' storage shed shown on the central portion of the storage yard. In 2009, Allied repaved (bituminous asphalt) the entire site in order to address drainage problems that had plagued this site for years. This repaving involved the reshaping and re- grading the entire site, followed by hard surfacing the entire storage yard areas and the parking areas along the front. This work was done as part of an overall grading /drainage plan reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and City Building Official, which was finalized in 2009. This new 13,300 sq. ft. building would be consistent with that style as a fully enclosed, machine shed (Morton brand) style of structure. The general location is along the northerly property line, which is adjacent to an existing and used railroad service line. 5 -12 -11 Page 1 ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The property is zoned I -2 General Industry. This storage building is permitted as an accessory use incidental to the permitted use of the subject site. The site is guided as I — Industrial in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. PROPOSED SITE AND BUILDING PLAN The site and building plan review is being processed under the provisions of Section 35 -230, Plan Approval, a copy of this section has been attached to this report for reference. The architecture of this new building is very plain and simple. The applicant proposes to use an Elliott designed, typical steel- seemed metal storage building. The overall height is shown at just over 27 feet, with the measured heights at 23.5 feet. The building's top cover will consist of a 3/12 pitched, steel seemed roof, which is considerably flat considering the overall size of the building. The Building Official stated any approvals for this building and site would need to meet full building permit and engineering (structural) review and approval prior to any construction. Colored photos of the proposed buildings have been provided to illustrate the earth tone colors. Please note there are no provisions or architectural standards contained within our City Code that regulate or require upgraded building materials, particularly in this I -2 District. Since this building is located in a somewhat isolated area and industrial district, Staff has no additional comments or requirements to provide on the appearance or building materials at this time. COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE Building Setbacks Ordinance Proposed Front Yard 35 -ft. 175+ ft. Rear Yard 25 -ft. 465+ ft. Side Yard 10 -ft. 10 -ft. Parking Requirements For Industrial and Wholesale use, Code requires one space for every two (2) employees; OR one (1) space for each 800 sf, of gross floor area, whichever is greater. The applicant indicted to staff that no more than 25 employees (at peak seasonal employment) are located at this site. The site currently has 65 marked parking spaces. The interior storage yard also has marked truck and trailer parking spaces, which are situated well away from personal vehicle parking areas. Calculations: • @ 1 per 2 employees: 25 employees / 2 = 12.5, or 13 spaces. • @ 1 per 800 GFA: Depending on how we calculate the "gross floor area" specified above, the required parking numbers can vary according to their calculations. The following is offered for consideration: 5 -12 -11 Page 2 0 19,266 sf. of office / 800 sf. GFA = 24 spaces 0 19,266 sf. office + 26,838 sf. of attached warehouse = 58 spaces The Parking Ordinance however, does provide that "In the event the latter requirement is greater, adequate land area shall be provided for the required off street parking area, but improved space need only be provided according to the employee's ratio." Staff interprets this provision to generally state that if a site has enough room or area to accommodate these "required" parking spaces, they need only improve (stripe, sign, mark, or pave) those needed for their employees. In this case, with the re- shuffling of materials from outside to inside areas, and the "openness" of this site, it appears Allied can accommodate these parking numbers if required. For all intents and purposes, the 65 spaces should be adequate to serve the employees and customer's needs at this time. GRADING /DRAINAGE & UTILITIES As indicated previously, Allied provided for the re- grading and repaving of the entire site in 2009 to alleviate drainage problems. This improvements was reviewed and approved by our City Engineers and Building Inspectors, and appears to be functioning well at this point. No significant changes to the overall grading and drainage plans will occur due to the installation of this building. The existing site currently has municipal water and sanitary services provided to this site. No changes or additions to these systems are planned. In review of the plan submittals and 1998 ALTA survey map (found in the city property files), there appears to be a 10 -foot wide NSP (now Xcel Energy) easement running along the northerly property line (and Soo Railroad right of way). We have made a condition that no part of this building may encroach onto this easement area. The plans and survey also reveal an old 17 -foot wide spur line easement in the area of the proposed storage building. Since this spur line is abandoned (per the Applicant) and they have no intention of ever utilizing this line again in the future operations of this site, Staff is not concerned with constructing a building over this easement area. If the City Attorney opines or determines otherwise, we will defer any easement vacation or determinations as per final City Council approvals. The Engineering Department will provide final review and comments on the drainage, utility, and grading components of this application as part of the overall review of the future building permit. LANDSCAPE PLAN The site is currently landscaped along its front (westerly) edge and south edge of the principal building. No additional landscaping is provided as part of these building improvement plans. RECOMMENDATION We believe the plans are in order and approval is recommended subject to the following conditions: 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official and Fire 5 -12 -11 Page 3 Chief with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. If required by the Building Official, the new building's automatic fire suppression systems shall meet NFPA standards and connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 2. An existing signed survey should be submitted showing the proposed building and exact distances from lot lines. 3. No permanent structure shall be constructed over any existing easements. The status of the railroad spur easement may need to be determined later by the City Attorney. 4. The plan should show grading limits, pavement removals and restoration. 5. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. An erosion control plan must be submitted with the construction plans. All erosion control items must be installed before construction begins. 6. The applicant shall submit an as -built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to issuance of any final certificate of occupancy. 5 -12 -11 Page 4 Section 35 -230. PLAN APPROVAL. It is declared to be the policy of the City to preserve and promote an attractive, stable residential and business environment for its citizens through encouraging well conceived, high quality developments. To this end, imaginative architectural concepts shall be employed in the design of buildings and in the development of respective sites. In this regard, every person, before commencing the construction or major alteration of a structure, except one and two family dwellings and buildings accessory thereto, shall make application for plan approval from the City Council. Plan approval may be required in conjunction with special use permit consideration. The following rules shall govern applications for plan approval. 1. Procedures a. A "Plan Approval" application shall be initiated by the owner of subject property or by his authorized agent. The applicant shall fill out and submit to the Secretary of the Planning Commission a "Plan Approval" application, copies of which are available at the municipal offices, together with a fee in an amount as set forth by City Council resolution. The application shall be filed with the Secretary of the Planning Commission at least fourteen (14) days prior to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission. b. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall refer the matter to the Planning Commission by placing the application upon the agenda of the Commission's next regular meeting; provided, however, that the Secretary may, with the approval of the Chairman of the Commission, place the application on the agenda for a special meeting of the Planning Commission. C. The Planning Commission shall report its recommendation to the City Council not later than sixty (60) days following the date of referral to the Commission. The date of referral is defined as the date upon which the application is first considered by the Planning Commission. d. The application and recommendation of the Commission shall be placed on the agenda of the City Council within eighteen (18) days following the recommendation of the Planning Commission, or, in the event the Commission has failed to make a recommendation, within seventy -eight (78) days of the date of referral to the Commission. 5 -12 -11 Page 1 e. The City Council shall make a final determination of the application within forty -eight (48) days of the recommendation by the Planning Commission, or in the event the Commission has failed to make any recommendation, within one hundred and eight (108) days of the date of referral to the Commission. If during City Council consideration of the plans the applicant submits substantially altered plans from those originally submitted and reviewed by the Planning Commission, the Council shall refer the altered plans back to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation except for alterations or changes requested by the City Council. The time needed for such a referral and review of altered plans shall not count against the time period which the City Council has to make a determination on the application. f. The applicant or his agent shall appear at each meeting of the Commission and the City Council to answer questions regarding the maps, drawings, plans and to furnish such information as may be required. g. The Secretary of the Planning Commission, following the Commission's action upon the application, and the City Clerk, following the City Council's action upon the application, shall give the applicant a written notice of the action taken. A copy of this notice shall be kept on file as a part of the permanent record of the application. 2. Required Documents Concurrent with filing application for plan approval, the applicant shall submit, as required, to the Secretary of the Planning Commission the following documents and information: a. A survey drawing by a registered engineer or land surveyor showing pertinent existing conditions, accurately dimensioned. b. A complete set of preliminary architectural drawings prepared by a registered architect showing: I An accurately scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating parking layout including access provisions, designation of locations of possible accessory buildings; landscaping, including trees and shrubbery with indication of species, planting, size and location. II Fences or walls or other screening, including height and type of material. III Lighting provisions, type and location. 5 -12 -11 Page 2 IV Curbs. V Building floor plans, elevations, sections and outline specifications, including materials proposed. VI Existing and proposed land elevations, drainage provisions, temporary and permanent erosion control provisions, and utility provisions as may be required. 3. Conditions and Restrictions The Planning Commission may recommend and the City Council may impose such conditions and restrictions as deemed necessary to protect the public interest and to secure compliance with the requirements of the ordinance. The conditions may include the execution and submission of a Performance Agreement with a supporting financial guarantee that the subject property will be constructed, developed, and maintained in conformance with the plans, specifications and standards. 5 -12 -11 Page 3 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 4, 2011 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning specialist FROM: Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor SUBJECT: Allied Building products; Inc 4810 Lilac Drive Public Works Department staff reviewed the following documents submitted for review for the proposed cold storage building; dated April 21, 2011 and has the following comments: 1. An existing signed survey should be submitted with the plan showing the proposed building and the distance from the side lot line and front lot line. 2. The paperwork as submitted indicates a drainage and utility easement. No permanent structure can be constructed on any existing easements. 3. The plan should show grading limits, pavement removal, restoration etc. 4. An erosion control plan must be submitted with the construction plans. 5. All erosion control items must be installed before construction begins. 6. Review by the fire department due to the proximity to the fence. 7. Certified asbuilts are required. )GISMap Output Page Page 1 of Allied Building Products, Inc. wirangle Par 7AVE.N S t3 5111 511 7 52 500-S2Di.... y !�� H5211 t '•• -"" i I E 5121 t ' � 39253419 3909 t Sts '%oi 133 I ;3913 3964.3615 i 4 5 5S StA.? 5ib7 9156 t j� 5139 � 34 € 43 ` ' 3611 � ` M44 z / 53 3 � 51.37 9338 3143 5344 f i: i 34 �� 3 3 5115 51 4 51 9 K .132 3413 ST N 6 E 10436553847 38/43835 9163` i 5332 51 ? St t6 ? 2 51�9i 7 5,. m.— J — f .....,.��....¢AK m 5t4(S 3320 J 5t67� k620 22Aa3tl6 5 38213515 o8 9 3829 3867 61t1t � 9165 6101 � . 51637 � ,: y � b €� 564$ R34.9 I 91630 5101 I 9186 / �„O �y� �S1tX33012396Cf . 3824 � J � J 1 � . 1 St t X3914 t8598839Fki 38243818 M )Q- Sd942 5643 1 1ST AVE N _ S € 3432 ! t i / 515 �`.- .."".... �� .._ ,-- ' ^ °t 7-- L....._.! .4642 - ...9803._ _ SW(# �/ i � 4- 5042 5893"" .• 50M 5837 I 5837 f '`�• gtl4� - 1 � 5050 '3881 �- . _.�...•..J —� -�� 503ti ., \ Happy Noll oio Parh So365631 . 3967 3931 3§16390731)013831-U25 3813 3807 �^ J/ • 3036 5030 9043 , 3925 i-Vgy ,L......'.......1..., `3839 j3881 5824 56 9624 5615 / / /f.. 5831 aw 1 ..1....a...... l .z ( ° 5#134 5018' 5619' ro 3P622 ! 1 0 ! 50161. Sn2a . 22 5813 9012 S013 1 1 ' / i58t2.. 5814 038 56t7" 5636 rn � / .....3400 3318 3318 50t>8..... 313 56 • 1 @ g 6 .._ ( 5012 0 •� 5601 3814 x56300 5(P(F1 ,ti. 54507 5004`Q 5038 "' ---- 3 '3416,34061 , , ' 5600 5883 ` T ` VE N_ F ...._._ ._ .... .........t ............................ . 58TH A ! / 'E '" 50TH 31 0 ' 34#W 37737 863' i !` x437 :� (.�.... ...... q��V4��II-_ f 4;j 11 37153 r ,( Jtti493t.,, r I [ W! 4944 4445 i ZJ-4�4 O 4933 x9'19 �.,.Sf� 7 436 44 w "._..;gg38 40 � z 4 4412 4 $ 44.33 C AW? �RT' "'€ y 0412 492t �, 4 V 4967°- 0 3342 3334 3328 3320 3.3F x ..- ` t '.w W , ,,_. J G i66 t ° -- 448 321 4411 W4412 i 483{3 w, ._ N -- � 12 _� !t j �St� 334433 !.,,,.� j�3137 �41E36�1t2�� t "9 W 3314, 3MI ° 32 3 `x _ ......... '[ a 3211 3217 Z,..,L 7 F X32, 3144` 3124 3281 33]5 i i i �_.,�- f I-"'' 4831 �.._ LAKE BREEZE AVE ��� 1751. kt�. �� i i /�/ 18: � { 3566 0 39 4401 1 , 1C`f' 3420.3410 3400 � _ ...... THAVE N 22.:' 540 r J r . 4E 7 ?. � 9619 i 3535 1 3601 1 34154401 22 r ' ...... .............._._._. .._ PyfFRti ......477HAVE..N. "� ... j 9k 4z 3 i _\ � ,a { 3713 �3'.E33 3$61 HIM 5 alp er.M d h 15 Ccgy,44.(Cp LOGE (M 2W5 8 788tt y PID: 1011821420039 Of 4810 Lilac Dr N BROOK Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 p:Hgis.logis.org/LOGI S_ ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= bc_logismap_ovsde &ClientV ersion =4.0 &Form= True &E... 5/10/20 w f S i„ s { R e � Al q - ------ --- -- "�E ELLIOTT smog D9Wgn1BWW 0015 UMAPLE RD 1 00 4.5 000.0— 5616 DA EDINk MN 55424 C0 (-� o 1P 1000.5 DIX. BU& (611Z Z001162 OAA, AA ti FAX (M 922-M Qo/ JI I rF AUED BLNLWVG Z I. PRODUCIS, M o P W10Lft.,D"N0M to fto*n CW*r, MN 55W zt.. - 7 ' 4 PAVS4W 0 I - 4 ^ , n e4,9 0; A4MVEMBYT VMS 1000-0 Z�Ox C 0; t PROJECT A ? 3 Irk aw 4OLa i 110, PROJECT NO. 1001 1 000 DP-AWN LAE 001 CT DATE 10-24-06 t REVIMN NO. DATE ONE sourcelONE solution A RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL ROOFING I SIDING I WINDOWS & DOORS ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP. WWW.ALLIEDBUILDING.COM ROSE: 4810 Lilac Drive North r Or 1111MMM1 NDWIAMA FF Brooklyn Center, MIN 55429 0"awmawwwn BLOO: 220 West 90th Street 1FELA111140FIMMA0FNIIIIINNNA Michael D. Lambert Bloomington, VIN 55420 Operations Manager Phone: 763-535-2300 --jam— Fax: 763-535-1122 mike.lambert@alliedbuilding.com Cell: 612-490-7225 SF ME CI ITOPOM C2 I C3 GRAOM PLM mo State Law requires notification of Gopher One Call NOTE5 45 hours prior to beginning work. Call 651.454.0002 for location of utility owned lines. Private utility lines I. Contractor Is responsible to visit the site prior to bidding to assure scope of work is under and will not be located - a5 part of Gopher One Call, but Is to call architect or " needed. 1neer prior to bidding for any clarification needed. There v4111 be no additional can be located by a contract locator or other suitable compensation for items that could have been clarified prior to bid siubmitals. Means. Gontract6r Is responsible for locating oil utility 2. Public streets ore to be clean of debris and dirt on a dolly basis. lines prior to construction. 3. L" te com pl e tion t; rnporcrq erosion control to be removed. al of projer 4. Verify all removals and scope of work. MAWNG ME: Background 5wvey provided by Allied Building Products, Inc. TOP* SUFNEY MVVV4G NtRvtBHt GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=100* 0 100 200 300 - ---------------- ---- - --- -- ----- ------ -0""-ELLIOTT DoWgnIBLdId as -77777 i 5616 RD DALINAU EDWA, KN 56424 BM (612) 2240I52 (95Z 922-M FAX WUMNM PAVMEW SECTION (213,000 sO: -C�ted mdairned aggregate bane 0 tltC to 1!A - T MNDOT 2331 Bass Cmm - 7 MNDOT 2341 Wear Cotme OM recVc1la) ALLIED BULDNVG All pcft to MNDOT "&callim, .4 1 PRODWS, 8C. a to 95% density 40 10 Ll= Ddvs Nodh Mix design and 94)PW to be q)pmwd by ergkvw fto*" anw, MN 55M . ...... .. PA vaAw ...... AFROVEMENT R. ALTERNATE PAVEMENT SECTOR PROJECT ca PHASE I AND 2 AREAS (Sw C5 R=kV NO �C�Ied W&W aggregate base ... rl 3 ' MNDOT 23311 Base Co" PROJECTNO. 100] . . . . .... 2'WW 2341 Wear Cwn W recycle) Al paging to MNDOT specreahm, DRAWN LAE compacted to 95% dmift "4 DATE M % PHASE 3 AND 4 AREAS REVISM NO] DATE No RecWaft AIM Peffnff Set W edges and m" e*IkV pot holles OmW 7 MNDOT 2341 wear cmw -7 0- W�nWiAUA AA C6RnF4CA7K* 1111 COMP(IM 0=11111AWAMANDWIAMA Y1111861111111MRIMMUNDIR MLM4OF18#3VROFWM= Ivan" SHEET ME NOTES- C1 ITOPOSUIlmy RJR 1) GRADE TO SrAKES PROVIDED BY DIGINEER --9- M�mt RZ --- C4 M WIN 2) STOCKPILE AND SALVAGE GRAVEL PRIOR TO EXCAVATING TO ACHIEVE GRADES --a— M PIK 4 4111140 PLAN 3) COMPACT BASE TO 96% K 4) IM ROLL WnH RALY LOADED TRUCK AS DIRECTED BY 84GHR ONE sourcelONE solution 5) SEE PHANG PM PHASES MAY BE COMMED 6) APPLY TACI(COAT PRIOR TO PAVM WW RIIIIE"IK I COMMERCIAL ROOFING ISIDING I WINDOWS HOORS 7) SEE PAVING SPECFM7M ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP. WWW.ALLIEDBUILDING.COM ROSE: 4810 Lilac Ddve North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Michael D. Lambert BLOO: 220 West 90th Street DRAWNG TffLE*. Bloomington, MN 55420 Operations Manager Phone: 763-535-2300 Fax: 763-535-1122 PAVM mike.lambert@alliedbuilding.com Cell: 612-490-7225 PLM DMV44G NUMBER: GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=100' t 1111111116J�1111 "MMME11 C4 0 100 200 300 tt3 d PLACE DODUE s"M SMW BLANKEr OVER ENTFIE POND AREA AND VEG0 NE — �� NOM, P6A A 81NALE 807TOM 988.Q' BASH REA TO Mr1t JD .%O ELLIOTT sE� I� �} AREA SUMUM V AND PLACE 15 Cyr A�ro PAR DOT sPEC DeeignIBuild g 9 • 5 V WIDE DOUBLE s g s �� 9 7 B LANKET O VER vER 56 � RD 9 nun p 1 p p p . 0 , MAT ASPHALT REINFORCEMENT ExF T t E BUS (612) 2200152 5 EDGE MNDOT 350' CM 922-MM .. .... ....'- -'••- -� ='•�- - -� -.- -� - 4° TOPSOIL . ........... ....•-----................._ :..:.:_...................::.._ - ---• - -• -- - -.... I DEPTH VARIES g 1 p 1 g9 b 0 p 10' WIDE SHALE AWED? BUKDll1� PRK?DUG75, M 3:1 SIDE SLOPES NOT To 51 4010uncraMrWnr«m 40 SCALE ENLARGrEMEM' OF POND AND SWALE OF 5KAL-E VW1N6 C40N6 TT0 cord r" 6lrr�oldyn Cor er, ASV 56429 PAYSWENT 1111il FAME ,° ;:� PROJECT rrr i+e wr raesaac PROUECr No, 1001 g s•rs~oo25•B x SECTION A —A oRAwfd tAE i px.s 't0 ..c, ea n - � ••._ s o : DATE 10 -24-08 w� • " o _ t ���„ �Y�.. -� o � q T . ��.�...�., t�v�lota ante Pe ' - . -� I�•f:. n x :.>v O ', " ZvU Ortu , Pe" i t f p 0 R Y� ♦ii :,. 4p �:P �•` ��' �� Q� fG�Yt4A0 STCp ~ w. •. ..,P���� io lit ti ( row, el ++utr r +ro raav"i xiR'w�c�'_ too w F J tV� •0' O r :4 t } , ' t.t WICAMON u, r' o a r$ I ti e.u. f,' g (g ` - Ftt6t8lVCEAIR'Ri11TORfNY*16 I " 0011 O r ) Ofl 0 8; q 9 YW18FI�AAIiOdfltrEaRt/C9tMY i ,p• � ..0,f(c. � . , 4 0 , w. ; .., 5�-' � .�� :� W"."` OI�Cf01iPFRV�IONAMAtATIAMA 1 P ��' t "�ro _ 9g9 1�FG�FMA f Ift s,p w O' :� 2- aT+tlf' �', n +wmemRw�wwrGSr a•rr PJ Utt'r.'7fL °: : 0 �., w� aas r rwwe m wr v aw+rw ass. tMICEBY� ,�0 1 ,� ln_ ri•IiFSCf? pi 1lCNitlIONNp I 1 rn,: tTl 9 w u a 00. f0� --- .0 IR EOtiGdr 911VLR mN, 91l j 11lL -0 91RU :! f urR i ,W.O� 9W 0...: 1Wl, R i q sa iwe�is SHM 1u 1 ......_ .. 1004 t . f ..o . o� ,--- -- i000 . o `�a. wn"`rcr m artc+ IIYS RK 6W FXLW:. 1 :.6 -- .•.i0• QEli1 u- wia mill a�i`, ws Cl TOM hub ]� _ V 9 g.5 .s• Pi Uh t[7 �O� •;,.,� .� 988.27 - 998.5 (� r ; n ' 'q.o uu - 99 3 g ' s 4 sofo.o CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ` . �� 1 �, r�u � _ r o rax ;._ ``emu I 2001 t� :, ,� d tT .i .. .... ' aLtifN.� r{,.,•t, �t Repill spill £ _ 3000 -0 ' . ■ —"'� , 999.0} c ,m }''�" t °� ONE sourcelONE solution " Rx r �$ ��.�ir.n •„ fir y 1 .� � �� � � c'aar,r of � �f�� Or�AOE ��� •�, RESIt)ENT4U 8COMMERCIAL ROOr 8 INGSIUINGwIN00WS DOORS e 0 !t mg OPIrQ Atom e I cam !° mr ': 'an _ r�l;' ALLIED Bll11DING PRODUCTS CORP DRAWING TITLE: o ` , da4 � • r "rtr� ,?b.Nt rex, .; WWW.ALLIEDBUILDINGCOM ROSE: 4810 Lilac Drive North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 f+ _ p6f�5618 r1 BL00: 220 West 90th Street Um� *A � _ "s a A t.4 4*.! 1 g oIi Michael D. Lambert Bloomington, MN 55420 Phone :763- 535 - Operations Manager DRAl N 2300 �� .. • to �+ , in .com Cell: 490 -7225 ~^ JI7 P _ c WGt oP IItdNMOfS�`J , +. r' "� uW ➢5R. b ' "t mike.lambert @alliedbuild g = x.00 p- Y. - ' C3 + � �,xrs.�»r , � ��gRR N 46 9� "N 16 < • +x 1 0 ,1a _ J '� ,' 1 r 0 100 200 300 iI - E '` - ELLIOTT P nNi Q4L na01 MKcoCN lo w 5616 DAiRYMPLE RD t w.M F EDMA, MN55 a ..i BM E 2? 221}0 F AX- maAMATI AREA APPRO X 221 r 0M SF 7 �+ u. 7 f •� t n s .r R A 4 ` G �z 3 R'PJfl1�1 A i AL!lED NG a� � BUllDI �wel n�plllatx.i IJ Ort. k PlR'ODll ISr M. .... o �' 7 a TTY 0L�: 1+10J1h 7 # � 1 LLAMA Nom'•` ALL RE TO ;. � TiON T FUIl DEPTH M . - ASPHALT AND A ConAor. AN 55W 4� r : ) AGGREGATE c i BASE 6- 29 •R - .....: : >::.::.::.:o-_ K :.: gfyct::: •: ::ice i AS DIRECTED BY ONSItE ENGINEER ( S \SMG MI'R It 2J ALL ASPHALT BEYOND REACH TO BE REMOVED ....... :. >:::;: >: <<:; >;::.::::.:..:: ;;;<�� :• : � - <; <: i3� Pa't2nit!t3sEEli'R3 _i: .::.:: N:� =r::::. •...: ....... - .. AND PLACED IN PATH OF RIECLAINiF]2 PAVEAW �q♦ , and? :.:. :.: „?z4 . <.::. >:....- . >::.: :.: - :< .:...:..:.:::.:.. >. : ..:.::3 ..:: >:.::: >:...:: _.:::.:.:.<::: >:.::.> . ::.:..::.:.:: .:.: , ` ry . { -�{� )q / >r , � .:.:.:...:::. � :.:..::.:.<..:. ,.::..:. :.,..:::.:..:. >:.,....� :.::: �._:..:. >:..:.:.:.: _.:,.: � �:::. �.:: >�: i�� . :3 , . - • ) COMRACTOR IS t5� FOR R8'A�R OF DAMAGE TO r CURBS r WALKS Uli1�S T!< r r L11r. PRCXECT , ::: -•a, ... ......... t c ._ :-. �... o-.'> g �ii�zii�EiiF�i 'F�i=E <'i:_�`ji`_ ?S >'F` 3ii` -i � 22i >diifi: iii >i`iFi x :.. :.:; ::: �::: -:�. � ::: _::. - . >:::::::.:.� <. :..:<.:.:.<:: < :� >:;:.:::::.�::.:..::..:::.::: - ,�. All CASTINGS TO AND .:.:.::. _x... ..:: • ::. >: »::.� _ : , <.::. <.� >...:.::::;..:. :._ :. ::: >:... >:.: � BE MARKED PROTECTED DURSVG ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 3 r ;:. 1.... uss p ot=' ' .,�..,.,.,....::. > • : ^.6r,.E :6 ..::::d:a� py�*kss?s:Y,.;;:: ;,;. , . f � 5? SPOCIE AGGREGATE PRIOR TO SUBCUTiiNG UNDEZtYNVG SODS TO A PROPER GRADE IN CUT GRADING C A REAS Paocr 1001 �. it K wr'a .uuW � ra � � �gipi' ,,,> p � 4y �,� •\ � � DRAWN LAE a s �,tl.• :. ,�,, '„ ,�� t ME 10-24-M A r t REVISION NO L1AlE V -M� n raM 0R , 4K tl -c 10, ea,aC {L � l ONE Source SOIUtlOrl i� RESIDENTIAL& COMMERCIAL ROOFING I SIDING I WINDOWS & DOORS COWMICA ® IJ#YC,B�'YRIATIFDGR ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP. /MDi WIMU -' ��`' " •` °. WWW.ALLIEDBUILDING.COMY( ROSE: 4810 Lilac Drive North MLA&WOFIMXWOFWOGM e;: aFJ► t Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 BL00: 220 West 90th Street IIIIIIIwrlta�ns Michael D. Lambert -' ~• '° � Bloomington, MN 55420 Operations Manager Phone: 763- 535 -2300 Fax: 763 - 535 -1122 �'.M SHffP WDDC mike.lambert @alliedbuilding.com Cell: 612 -490 -7225 SHEET TINE C l T OPQ SURVEY ER0510N CONTROL 5TANDARD NOTES 1) install slit fence at the locations shown on the plans prior to beginning construction. 4) Maintain all temporary erosion and sediment control devices in place until the PKANOU PLAN Install slit fence with post 5pocing of 4 feet or less. Drive � at least I foot Into the corntrbvting dratnac)se area has been stabilized, inspect all temporary erosion and 1 5editm6(Tt Zr`ai dsev on a dal basis. Remove accumulated sedimenrt ground. Anchor the si t fence fabric In a trench fat least b deep an b inches daily depos its wide) ddvuqq an the up slope side of the support posts. Lay the fabric in the trench and from behind erosion and sediment control dev "s as needed. Do not allow sediment tF�n backflll and compact. Make any spikes In the fabric at a fence post. At splices, to ocum3ulote to a c�pth of more than one -half of the height of the erosion and overl the fabric at least 6 inches, fold it over, and securely fasten It to iris fence sediment control devices. Immediately replace deteriorated, damaged, or rotted post. Slit fence supporting posts shall be 2 -Inch square or lager hardwood, p ins, or erosion control devices. standard T- or U- section steel posts. Posts shall have a minknurn length of 30 inches 5) Temporarily or permanently stabilize all denuded oreas which have been finish graded, lus bur�i depth. and al denuded areas in r&1 grading or site building construction Re move Ail tem su structural, non"btode adable erosion and sediment operations are not actively agalnst erosion due to rain, wind and running final 3) Re a ll soils and sediments ticed m otherwise onto public and water w1Fhh 14 d r uds. seedt mulching, Bros trot matting, and/or N soddm stale in 6 Ris een areas. e ear fication of oval base on private pavement areas. Removal shall be on a oily basis throughout the duration of areas �e be pave the construction. Glean paved r bbyy shovel#�g or sweeping. Street washing is 6) Perform all erosion control practices M accordance with the methods outlined in the allowed only after shaveling or�fias rerrwved sediment. best management practices hoh book: "Protecting Water Gtualtty in Urban Areas, DRAWING 1111E q) Locate soil or dirt stockpiles contoln more than 10 cubic yards of material with a down slope drainage Q 15hned by the Minnowt:a Pollution Control Agenu length of no less than 25 fast from the toe of the pile to a roadway or drainage charnel, if rema ng for more r I mist protection at all catch basin Inlets, r3nIch receive runoff from the than seven dajs, stabilize the stockpiles by mulching, vege tative cover, tarps, or other means. Control erosion �tw'�d areas. Gakch basin inserts or staked slit fence is the best option. F aN stockpiles bM lacing silt fence barriers around the plies. Duitnq street I epair, coverconstnvctbn so[I a b) Unless otherwise noted, the =opriote dates for spring seedincooddirq are from dirt stoc ties bcloser than 25 feet to a roadw or dra clwrrne! with and otect storm sewer Apr11 15 throucl .June 1. Fail sodding is generally acceptable from Ault i5 tfrolx�h PLM inlets with and rock sedtrnent fliter5 or slit fence Inage fps' November l; fall seeding from August JS through September I5. Seed9ng must take 10) Construct all proposed side slopes wlth grades riot exceeding 3:1 (3 horizontal to Ivertical). P Pt � `5optefr6er 15. After September 15, waft Lmtii November I to perform GRAPHIC SCALE 1 " =100' C2 0 100 200 300 Created : Fri Apr 0108:42:10 2011, System SBS 10.0 BUILDING DESCRIP77ON ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA BUILDING CODE :2007 MINNESOTA NOMINAL SIZE: WIDTH LENGTH EAVE HT. 1 EAVEHT. 2 SLOPE 1 SLOPE2 BUILDING END USE :3B COMMERCIAL - WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE BUILDING CLASSIFICATION BLDG A I6'-0 X 175'-0 X 20'-0 20'-0 3.00; 12 3.00:12 COLLATERAL LOADS :0.50 (TOTAL) SPRINKLER :0.00 CEILING :0.00 OTHER :0.50 GROUND SNOW LOAD :50.00 MINIMUM ROOF SNOW LOAD :0.00 SNOW EXPOSURE : PARTIALLY EXPOSED WIND LOAD :90.00 MPH WIND EXPOSURE : EXPOSURE B ROOF LIVE LOAD :20.00 LIVE LOAD REDUCTION : YES SEISMIC VALUES : SS - 6.10, S1 -2.70 SOIL TYPE : (D) STIFF SOIL PERCENT SNOW LOAD IN SESMIC : NORMAL MATERIALS BUILDER(CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF STEEL BAR, PLATEAND SHEET USED IN THE FABRIC477ON OF MANUFACTURERS STANDARD PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONSAPPL YAND UNLESS STIPULATED ©• i BUILT -UP PR /MARYAND SECONDARYS7RUCTUR4L FRAM ING MEMBERS CONFORM TO AS7MA529, OTHERWISE INTHE ORDER DOCUMENTS, MANUFACTURERS DESIGN, FABRICATION, QUALITY CRITERIA 0v ASTMA572, ASTMA1011 SS, ORAS77WA1011 HSLAS WlTHA MINIMUM YIELD POINT OF 50 KSl. STANDARDSAND TOLERANCES WILL GOVERN. / THE BUILDER/CONTRACTOR ORA/E FIRM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OVERALL PROJECT f MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF HOT ROLLED STRUCTURAL SHAPES CONFORM TO ASTMA992, COORDINATION. THEBUILDERICON7RACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ERECTION OF STEEL AND ALL V OIJ ^ FLANGE BRACES, A THM CONFORM TO STMA 6 INIM 50 HOT ROLLED ASSOCLATED WORK LW WITH TH MANUFIRER REQUIRED R SUCH Z I , ANGLESNGLES, , OTHER THAN FLANGE BRACES, CONFORM TO ASTMA38 M MNMUM AS TEMPORARYGUYS, &, BRACES, OTHER FALSE WORKOR OTHHER ELEMENTS EMENTS REQUIRE RED F FOR R ERECTION ERECTION WILL Z L c 8 BE DETERMINED, FURNISHEDAND INSTALLED BY 7HE BUILDER/CONTRACTOR. ALL INTERFACE HOLLOWSTRUCTURAL SHAPES CONFORM TOAS7MA5W GRADER MINIMUM YIELDPOINTIS AT(DCOMPATI BI LI TYOFANYMATERL4LSNOTFURN ISHEDBYMANUFACTURERARE THERESPONS IBILITY a OFAND TO BECOORDIN,47ED BY THE BUILDER/CONTRACTOR ORA/EFIRM. UNLESS SPECIFIC DESIGN 42 KSI FOR ROUND HSSAND 46 KS/ FOR RECTANGULAR HSS F CRITERIA CONCERN/NGANYINTERFACE BETWEEN MATERIALS IS FURNISHED AS PART OF THE a 4Q GENERAL NOTES ORDER DOCUMENTS, MANUFACTURER ASSUMPTIONS WILL GOVERN WHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST MATERIAL PROPER7IES OF COLD- FORMED LIGHT GAGE STEEL MEMBERS CONFORM TO THE BETWEEN MANUFACTURER DRAWINGS AND THE PLANS OF OTHER TRADES, MANUFACTURER DRAWINGS a f ° m 1) ROOF PANEL 26 GA. PBR - GALVALUME PLU REQUIREMENTS OFASTMA1011 SS GRADE 55, ORASTMA1011 HSLAS CLASS I GRADE 55, WITH SHALL GOVERN. THEBUIL DER /COMfLiCTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING ALL OTHER PROJECT 2) WALL PANEL 26 GA. PBR -POLAR WHITE _ A MINIMUM YIELD POINT OF 55 KSL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLYKITH 774EAPPLl6981E REQUIREMENTS OFANYGOVERN /NG 3) CANOPY SOFFIT PANEL -WA 4) FACADE SOFFIT PANEL - WA BUILD /NGA1,17HOR /TIES THE BUIL DER /CONTRACTOR MUSTSECUREALL REQUIRED APPROVALSAND PERMITS FROM 7HEAPPROPRI 7EAGENCYAS REQUIRED. 6) EAVE GUTTER GA. t 10 SPECIF /CATIONS 6) SAVE FLASH 26 GA. -LIGHT STONE �� 7) GABLE FLASH 26 GA. -LIGHT STONE 1 g' THESEDRAKINGS SUPPORT]NGSTRUCTURAL C4LCUL4T70NSANDDESIGNCER77FICA17ON 8) CORNER FLASH 26 GA. - LIGHT STONE RE BAS THESE DOCUMENTS ED ON DOCUMENTSAS OF THE DATE DRAWINGS 9) BASE FLASH 26 GA. N83 -LIGHT STONE j/] MATERIALS SUPPLIED BYMANUFACTURER FOR THIS BUILDING HAVE BEEN DESIGNED ARE EDON ORD DOCU ALSUPPLTED THE DAT D ATEOFTHESE 10)ALL OTHER TRIM -LIGHT STONE `J p . g '� f /NACCOROANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDER DOCUMENTS ANYALTERATIONS TO THE DRAWINGS ANY CHANGES TO THE ORDER DOCUMENTSAFTER THIS DATE WILL VOID THESE STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OR REMOVAL OFANYCOMPONENTPARTS SUCHAS, BUT NOTLIMITED TO, DRAWINGS, SUPPORTING STRUCTURAL CALCUTAT IONSAND DESIGN CERTIFICATION. THE 2 CROSS SECTION MEMBER MARK NUMBER CUTTING OR REMOVAL OF GIRTS, ROD BRACING, OR FLANGE BRACES SHOWN ON THESE ERECTION BUIL DER /CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR NOTIFYING THE GOVERNING BUILDINGAUTHORITY EN NOTES DRAWINGS OR THEADDITION OF 07HER CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OR LOADS WILL VOIDALL OFALL CHANGES TO THE ORDER DOCUMENTS WHICH RESULT IN CHANGES TO THE DRAWINGS, m SECTION WARRANTIESAND CERTIFICATIONS SUPPLIED BYMANUFACTURERAS THEYAPPLY TO THIS COND177ON DESC. (dxbxt) L OJ (DOOR JAMB ANYSTRUCTURAL FIELD MODIFICA77ONS MUSTBE UNDER THEINREC77ON OFA LICENSED ARCHITECT, SUPPORTING STRUCTURAL CALCULATYONSAND DESIGN CERTIFICATION. '$RACING SIZE' AS AUTED aV ENGINEERING DDEUENTS AND ERECTILIN (!N) Q (/N) CIVIL OR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. MANUFACTURER WILL ASSUMENO RESPONSIBILITY FOR BRAVIMiS DENOTES THPEIID DIAAETER FUR ROD BRCING A AND VNE STRAND f- z b DH (DOOR HEADER) LOADS OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFIED IN THE ORDER DOCUMENTS. 771E BU/LDERAANTRAICTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORAPPL YINGAND OBSERVINGALL CABLE B14METER FI)P VDPE STRAND CABLE BRACING 8.5075 8.5X3256075 .750 PERTINENT SAFETY RULES AND REGULATIONS AND OSHA STANDARDS AS APPLICABLE. 00 ' GC (CEE MEMBER) MATERIALS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED WITH MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD DESIGN 8.5092 8.5X3.250.092 1.00 ALL HILTED JOINTS VITH A325 TYPE I BUTS ARE SPECIFIED AS IOC75 =2- 750075 1.125 PRACTI WHICHARE BASED ON PERTINENT PROCEDURESAND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SUPPLYING DESIGN DATA AND DRAWINGS SEALEDBYA LICENSED ENGINEER FOR N CC F MA7ER/ACSS'UPPLIED BYMANUFACTURER, DOES NOTIMPLYOR CONSTITUTEANAGREEMENT THAT STRUCTURAL JTIINTS USING ASTM A325 LiIP A490 BATT .ANNE � 2W4, d t 10084 IOX275C084 I. FOLLOWING ORGANIZATIONSAND CODES: AG MANUFACTURER OR ANY OF ITS AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES IS ACTING AS THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR PRETENT101 AV7W S NaUBM TUNS -13F*- NIT AND CALIBRATED VRENCH Co E --.i DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FOR THE CONSTRLIC77ON PROJECT. NEITHER MANUFACTURER NOR ANY OF ITS ARE DOT REWWWA $ 1:1 E] )00100 )0X2750.100 1.1875 AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES ISAC77NG AS THE ENGINEER OFRECORD OR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FOR THE 12080 12X3250080 1.41 AMERICA IRONAND STEEL INSTITUTE. 'SPECIFICATI FOR THE DESIGN OF CONSTRUCRONPROJECT. THESE DRAWINGS AND DESIGN DATA ARE SEALED AS CERTIFICATION THAT THE AWAFACTURER HAS ACT DESIGNED THE STRGCTU/RE FER SAUV B " COLD - FORMED STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS'. THEMATERIALS FURNISHED BYMANUFACTURERAREI N CONFORMANCE WITHALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCL LY-ATMV La4DS AT THE GRDWD LEVEL WHICH MAY DWOSE SAVV O 12CM 12X3256088 1.50 THE BUILD CODEAS SPECIFI ON THE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA SHEET. ORDER DOCUMENT'S DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OFANYMATER/ALS NOT FURNISHED BYMANUFACTURER LOADS DN THE VALL FRAMDAAG BY AkOAWACnAW& g m o 120100 12X3256100 1.52 AND FOR 774E OVERALL PROJECTARE THE RESPONSI B ILITYOF THE BUILDERICONTRACTOR AND E rrl SECTION MET ALBU CDINGMANUFACTURERSASSOCIA770N.' 10WRISE B UILDING SYSTEMS DESIGN PROFESSIONALS OTHER THANMANUFACTURER UNLESS SPECIFICALCYINDIGATED OTHERWISE. ALL GRAVITY LOADS IF THE WALL SYSTEM MIT BY MAMFACTtREA ARE SLI°PlIR 9 O a DESC. (dxb(IN) (IN) ) L Z(PURLIN ) MAN(/AL" ENTIRELY BY THE B ILDIAG FL TMk $ 3 APPROVAL OFMANUFACTURER ORAW/NGSAND DESIGN DATAAFFIRMS i7iAT MANUFACTURER HAS Z(GIRI) CORREC77YINTERPRETED AND APPL /ED THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDER DOCUMENTS AND CONS 77TUTES TIC VALL SYSTEM AUr BY WXFACTUPER SU"I'MT AEIMBERS LAS BWLDAW) C ¢ N LL IlAi57 8.5X25-057 .789 BU /LDERICONTRACTORSACCEPTANCE OF MANUFACTURERS I NTERPRETAPONOF THE ORDER DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY NAMFACTUPER HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO DEFLECT LESS THAN L12 8.5284 8.5X257.084 .781 ALL WECDI NG IS PERFORMEDINACCORDANCEWJT74AWS D1.I. UNLESS OTHERWISE CALLED AND OFMANUFACTURERS STANDARD PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS. INCLUDING ITS DESIGN, FABRICATION, (AVDER WIND LIP SETSMIC L17ADD1r THE WALL SYSTEM ACT BY AWNAFACTURER a NOT 70 SCALE b SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE DUMDE FLANGE DF THE SLPPLIRT AETMBER AT A VERSION PAPER SIZE FOR ON THE ORDER DOCUMENTS. AND QUALITY CRITERIA STANDAROSAND TOLERANCES. 8.9-72 8.SX2sz072 .951 MAKI" SPACING LIB 4 FEET LLG THE INTLUE FLANGE W THE SWIPURT sBS 10.0 22x34 8.5280 8.5X2.57.080 .985 MASONRYANOTILT -UP CONCRETE WALLS B YOTHERSARE PRESUMED TRUE, PLUMBAND HAS BEEN DESIGNED AS UNBPACED UNLESS NOTED ON THE ERECTION DRAWINGS, NO FIELD WELDING IS REQUIRED. WHERE LEVEL ESTIMATOR DATE 8.5288 8.5X25Z.088 .978 FIELD WELDING IS SPECIFIED THE BUADEMCON7RACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAVE STRUTS AT MaDDiGA) A ARE NUT IESII�WD TD SUSTAIN TRANSVERSE d I IaZ75 1OX2.75Z.075 1.0 DETERMINING THE METHODS AND PROCEDURES TO FULFILL WELD REQUIREMENTS. THE BUILDER/ CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VER /FICA77 OFALL SHIPMENTS VRW OR SEISMIC LOAMM FR@N T VALL SYSTEM ACT BY AWJFACTLVIER goo~ 4111011 MANUFACTURER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR WELDMENT SURFACE PREPARATION EXCFPTAS RECEIVED. SH ORTAGES MUST BE REPORTED TO MANUFACTURER NN 15 DAYS OF DELIVERY fOZ84 I= 75Z.084 1.0 SPECIFIED IN THE ORDER DOCUMENTS. END RAFTERS AT BUILDIAG(S) AC ARE MIT DESIGNED TO SUSTAIN TRANSVERSE 102100 IOX2.75Z.100 1.0525 VIND LIP SEISMIC LDADIAG FROM THE WALL SYSTEM ACT BY NAAWACTLRER, 122M 12X325ZOSO 128 WHERE SHOWN IN MANUFACTURERS STRUCTURAL C4CCULA77ONS, LATERAL STABILITY OFENDWALLSAND LONGI TUDI NALSTABEITYOFSIDEWALLSRELYOND14PHR4GA4ACT10NOF7HE WALL PANELS PROVIDED BASE ANGLE PRDVIIED ABOVE VALL SYSTEM ACT BY AWA,PACTLIROP IS HOT BM MEMBER 12288 12X325 -088 1.35 BYMANUFACTURER. REMOVAL OF THESE WALL PANELS CAN RESULTIN LESS THAN THE MINIMUM LENGTH TO SUSTAIN TRANSVERSE VIND OR SEISMIC La4DDIG FROM THE VALL SYSTEM 12Z100 12X3252.100 1.37 OF WALL PANELS REQUIRED AND WILL VOID ALL WARRANTIES AND CER77RCATIONS SUPPLIED BY NOT BY MANWACTURER, --as -esesse... SECTION MANUFACTURERASTHEYAPPLYTO THIS COND177OM THE FIELD INSTALLATION OFX- BRACING OR OTHER M B M R DESC. (d x b x t) L E (SAVE STRUT) MEANS TO PROVIDE LATERAL STABILITY MAYBE REQUIREDAS A RESULT OF THEREMOVAL OF WALL PANELS b ( (IN) PANELS. .750 The engineer whose seal appears hereon &5E75 8.5X3 is an employee for the manufacturer for the 8.5E92 8.5X3250.092 1.00 materiels described herein. Sold seal or certification is Invited to the products IOE84 10X3250084 1.19 designed and manufactured by d t manufacturer only.The undersigned IOE84 =3.6245C.084 1.25 engineer is not the overall ergireerof 12EM 12X3256080 1.41 record for this prelect- 12EB8 12X3 25C 1.50 INSPECTIONIJOBSITE 12E100 12X3256100 1.52 SPECIAL SHOPAND ALL FIELD INSPECTIONS ANDASSOCZ4 TED FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BUILDER /CONTRACTOR UNLESS SPECIFIED 07HERKlSEIN THE ORDER DOCUMENTS. FIELD INSPECTION MAY BE SPECIFIED BY THEAPPLICABLE BUILDING CODEAND/OR THE STATE OR LOCAL JURISDICTION, NOT BYMANUFACTURER. MANUFACTURER is NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR GENERAL SITE SUITABILITY, JOB SITE INSPECTION, OR ERECTION MONITORM SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BUILDER/CONTRACTOR. 1. THIS DRKING,INCLUD /NG THE INFORMA77ONHERE, REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF MANUFACTURER AND IS PROVIDED SOLELYFOR THE PURPOSE OF ERECTING THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED IN THEAPPLNCABLE ORDER DOCUMENTS AND SWILL NOT BE MODIFIED, REPRODUCED, OR USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE M74OUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF MANUFACTURER B D 2. THE GENERAL CONTRACTORANDVR ERECTOR IS SOLELYRESPONS/BLE FOR ACCURATE, GOOD QUALITY WORKMANSH /P IN ERECTING MATERIALS FOR THIS BUILDING IN CONFORMANCE WITH THIS DRAWING, DETAILS REFERENCED IN THIS DRAWING, ALL APPLICABLE MANUFACTURER A ERE07701V GUIDES, AND /NDUSTRYSTANDARD.S. °Z 521�,�� l ove � y- e7y W7 b 3 ( � 0 3 Al ® �� pia 3� a rte" 13 N 3 � � ,,N r6�- p 1 " '�' - ✓" � A � " 0 (/ � l �./ � � - -- '+ - /// !! °i /.a ° ° ° °!i °i° // ii iiiiiipii iii /� ► "--� "���Ip - - + ---- + +_ \ / f / ° °!!!i/i /� \ iiii + wsai;0vvr w_wwws less L i /i ° °/� !i!!!i!/.i iiii ®iii \ / - iSaw- w - + +•f iiiii ■iii r f smile r. _�Omac9 _ �� _ +_... -- __ +- + -+ +• \ \\ // /if.i° ° /f ° ° ° °i /si /• /� \\ /.f• / / / ° ° / /ifif /// �� _- ssss �r i s�'°" // \iiiiitii ■iiiii 33333333343$./ l��ii ! �,� ./�/S t-si �3 `iliii \\ /i!. /f iiiiii■ !/ / /Mg°°i t/ \\ - J■ -3 l::_,-p- ♦♦ _ '-.1 SWOON "M♦ .// _� l�P rr 2 22at \\ . ♦ ■ , 333$ iii /i /� r \\ / i.fii \ _ j %3_- r�� as 22a �+ ♦ $ ■ip / h / \ 333i/'e! cc g! rr r a 2Z \ ♦ �!3 _ r /°° / /i° / \ r __ - _ t %�__- rl "r r aaa 2 2 „rr"'�\�'\♦33 iii .4. ■ _�. ° ■isi°°°f°is / \\ sifsf / _ �a i!1 a2�2la22aa���C \ yyyyrrr4 �1ii�, _ \ iiiiii i _ 33333 :3' - / \ /i ___ 3,3le- `C rrr"r`.rr" a s r..'� "`�j \. " yggy �i yu,\ ♦ / 11111 r3 ° - / /fs!/ ■ ■ /�/_ ���� rrrrrr aaaa 2a2� r�� \\r$ Qr� \ \" ♦ \ . _ /fe■ - as = =' e_ ___- sf f./•° c 4i r r� 222aa 2 a a \ E` ii 33� iii .aS° rri`Cc `aa aaa rr ••\ ~ ,.r �'� \ \` `ia2\ ,' \ ■■ 3 .4 ■i i■ f'° - // r�f \ _ 1. _ aaQ - aa rr r \ \\ rrrr r rr \ \\ rr t\ i 33 ii \ / r$rmrr���¢ 3i 'i- \ �■ !�! E��� rr rria1a2a ..yyr ` rrr i 5 � \ \" rr2� `� aayya\ ♦ !l�i� ii g■ o n�.,1,. !1!� � r r4 r 22 2 rrr \ \ 3 a �` ■ C r \ rrr � � , ;;:::: s easo nal 4� I yy ! r aaaa as rr 3� / ..!°° +w _� \\ - _% %I /� °�'3! �„r� r4rr r"` a�yy rr^ \4 rr yr \ \„`, r aaa 22 "y2�r.d1 �,��♦ iii rr \ /.■ / _\ •� _ ! /._s_ �� Kitk a a \` R rrr \ \,� rr aaa ♦ \ �f. / 'i =� - - � r \ a! az �. a � ,. ♦ i Iii .* ..° sr= - _! ��� ii as _ aaa /. `;R'!i4 ..���� r 2aC a��l ;aaaa r.r i3 �y \ \ ~` 2�2� a ; 111ttt q • ♦�� - - ! ! rrr``rr`rr a � rr \\ r ��` � rr a aa� a2 �r � �e � �♦�� ♦ i� i iif$ / - !!l l.f• /� Cy� rrr aaaa r �" \\ ` r r rr " \\ aaaa y aaarr Mr aaaaa \\ �� wy -•w•J ` d■ °. aa$ a ia d °� ���� r r°rr ; tit aaaa 2 r rrr: \L' \w �a aaaa rr••r A aaaa rt .••,� /!!.°!° a as !<! a!° ��� �! 2a��a a aaa rk r \ \ \ywrrrti r " \ \ \i �„ �2 �` "rr as aaa �����r / aaa $ r ° \\ rr„r e i a:C rr`222 22aa.�.:�i�r \; ``rrr` i t ; \ \ ' " 2aaa Za22 �a2rr rr aaaaaaaa n �� ! aaaaaaa - �� ■�� I '� ��e: -- �e rrr a � " r a � g i aaa ��� `r�r`2�~ e r aa aaaaa R 44a , ! 2 2 W � rC r a aaaa aaa !! 22 22 222 '" U �� a� �e� �` "aa2 i, ` 2aaaa f � �r` � \�2 ? ~rr rr r ` r 22 2 a rr a lit 22�i �� 2��� C �Z�� ! ! rr \ 2 ai �!`` ` \ \ ` "`22 aar� a4a y "r �� C \ � r rr "2222 2222 r 2��� �.��, � a 22 22 r rrr ai� � aaaa it r� a 22 �"a E � •,, ! rrr \ \C` rr �`, a2 �� � t a �' `�'� aaa � ��� � :1 aaa jp '� �� '�� � � ' � ■ rrrr y r` y Y ��� ! aaaaa � yj��� Y Y Y 7AI / V l N Cn J � _ C31 N cn N Cn N cn 18' 20' 20' 18' m v D 38' 38' mo w■ I A A■ I A A A I J A■ 12 3.0000 Wi -O MOI -O ME -O 0 20' 12 3.0000 Zo 1H913H 3AV3 - .OZ ..8 19 .it 0 0 0 CV „ L ;Z cM , 9 L 96 _ L „AL. x „ALL co M 9L �d £ - .LZ w .,k ; / V / O H -Z zo 9� -,Z J L' - ' sr ,Z SIN ti ti bo M L ,E �I CM CV L � 0 0 cn ..8 .9 HF)1:1H :qAH=l —.67 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Gary Eitel, Director of Business & Development SUBJECT: Final Plat Review of Shingle Creek Crossing DATE: May 10, 2011 Background: On April 28, 2011, the Planning Commission conducted public hearings on the Preliminary Plat and the Planned Unit Development Rezoning of the Shingle Creek Crossing Commercial Redevelopment of the Brookdale Mall Properties, the Midas Site, and the EDA parcel (former Ground Round Restaurant site). The Commission unanimously moved the adoption of the following resolutions: - Resolution No. 2011 -06, recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat, - Resolution No. 2011 -07, recommending approval of the PUD Rezoning and Site & Building Plan Approval for the Walmart Site. Consideration of these Planning Applications were scheduled for the May 9, 2011 City Council Meeting; however, the developer requested that City Council consideration be postponed until the May 23, 2011 meeting to allow the developer and Sears to complete their negotiations on issues raised by Sears on the demolition of the Mall and redevelopment of a Town Center commercial PUD. On the May 9, 2011 City Council Work Session, the City Council did receive an update on the April 28 Planning Commission recommendations on the Shingle Creek Crossing Planning Applications and was informed of the following items that are scheduled for the May 23, 2011 City Council Agenda: • Public Hearing to consider the vacation of easement associated with the Shingle Creek Crossing Subdivision. • Preliminary and Final Plat approval of Shingle Creek Crossing. - Consideration and approval of a Subdivision Agreement. • Planned Unit Development approval for Shingle Creek Crossing. - Consideration and approval of the PUD Agreement/Declaration of Covenants & Restrictions • Tax Increment Financing Agreement for Shingle Creek Crossing - Financial Assistance Package associated with 1 St phase minimum improvements, EDA parcel purchase agreement, & Midas acquisition/addition to the PUD plans. Attached for your reference is a copy of the staff memorandum which accompanied the April 28 Planning Commission Minutes, Resolutions, and Reports that were included in this work session item. Final Plat of Shingle Creek Crossing: Section 15 -105, Para A -2 of the Subdivision Ordinance includes the provision that a copy of the final plat shall be submitted to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission may, at its discretion, submit a report to the City Council. Attached is a copy of the Final Plat that will be placed on the May 23, 2011 City Council meeting. It is my understanding that the Commission has chosen not to formally act or report on Final Plats in the past. The proposed final plat is consistent with the Preliminary Plat as recommended by the Planning Commission on April 28, 2011. SHINGL E CREEK CROSSING R.T. Doc. NO. MEN BY THESE IRISIN 11 -1 _y d­FI p­i i­ 11.1 1 ­y L.-T-d I ­ S­­ St.b, KNOW I f ALL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - .1 NI, d­'Ib'd ­­y 0.1. lb. 11.1 .11 Lb,"t 1.1 h­ B­ W, bb-b.t. ­ K_ F. lbbtl­ Ih. I IN dbl, f Ili. FbILL-11 ­ t­ FIRN; -d .11 P.Lli� ­ h..b ..d thim PRO, 1_A 1. . L. SeIOI-111 1— 1­1 ­ bOb. ._­m County. M Hen p Sole of Mmnesnlo, Ie we_ C.T.d 'h - - - - - A - y f 'o. . . A111 T. vcls - D - - - - -- ­1 E 1430, Hennepin ,, V.1 - kS _H ­... IF, 15ANG III Fbldiii- I An 11-t A. C, D ­ 1 E. Fag l­­ ­d Survey N. 1169. 1—— Coun Y STATE 0 IES AFd C DTNT1 � HE NN O M OTA NNERII A. R C. 'B" ­b­ L"b" ­­'- 7­ d, - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 20-_ by M­ S. Haman Trocls An ­Ft A, Registered I— Survey R., 1649, .w1y__:;_.bb. - 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - c.-ty, My C.­­.. E­­ ------------------ - An Troc IS and C, Registere I— 1.­y ­ 1110, Hennap C-11, Mmnesoto And BROOKLYN CENTER. MINNESOTA T,.,I. A ­1 3, Registered I.nd Su y N. 1766. H­F.n Ca . Iy MI-1--l- 11­1 ­d IF1 And 1L.1 CIL, 1 .1 ,I d.y f - - - - - - - - - - - - - the ­N­ ..--A, F. Ih, 1­1 ­ .­11 EWIt- FI.P ­­ f fidl.­g bbIbli­ 11­1ty llit-1-1 C­ly ` I— pl.1 I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING A p R­ ,j ­e­ by th. C.ty C­ d 0 tn�,l " . " I ' I ' l Et i ----- B Lb. ­­­d 30 d.y p­.d h.. W.p­ -th-L ipt f ­ KWI by h F.bb - d IF, ­U, of ­­b, 1. ..1 b, 91,..y EEngi I,— I,— ­FW­d by .03 ­ C.ty or _ i.., St.b.t. , ­n 505 ­1 2 Tf..I A. v retl Jana Su Y o. I—. Hm epu C­ m'­­` 1 11 d as S SH CREEK CROSSING ­ do � I,—, ­ d,F­ 1. the F-Blic vu 1 - 1 .... "I CITY COOK— OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA ty b, M III— on ­d 1.1 wnmeol - - - - - - - h- caused 11-1 Pl­­ be ­d by I. Ill.— Ni­ I— __ - - IN, f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- BY.._ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - __M Onoger 2C - -------------------- TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT, H­pin County, M­­t. SONI - ----- it --------------------- I hereby h 20-- one ­ years have I,— i I- mne d--b.d on thi. Pmt. aalee Ini ----- b-1 -1 2D_ STATE 0E MINNESOTA COUNTY OF - - - - - - - - - - ------------------- -- C"y T f­g­g .., ­ ... b,dg.d I,—, d.y f blt � .7f 21-_ b - -- - - ------------------ Jill I Al­­ Hennepin C.bly Auditor - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I ­i� ----------- - - - - - - - - SURVEY DIVISION, H,,bb­b C.FbtY, M1b­t- P­T­ 1. IBIEESBI (1­). �hi. pmt h- I— ,i this - -------------- 2D__ My Commission Expires ------ - ------------ 1, ibn- ­1 City —­I Ell-011. 1- ­­d tE,, present I. L. s ign ed by its PI.I.f .11m tli� ----- Witj P Brown. Hennepin C oun t y BY: -__ - - --------------- ------- - -- y of ER.." c-O, REGISTRAR OF 1111-05. He n ai C­,, M,bb­.t. SIGNED -- - -------- - --------- - t' -------------- - ----- I he re by cared, I— the within v eal of SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING woo I.— in I— K fli c . Ibis - - - - day of ..... . . ....... 20 ___ of ---____ o'c lock STATE OE MINNESOTA COUNTY 0I - - - - - - - - - - ­1­1 HI C.-Iff, Registrar o f TiN,A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Th. '% -- --------------- - - - - - - - - - - 'y Broo . Commission Expires - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S UNDE LAND SURV"RVG SHEET I OP 2 SHEM 75, SEE �ETAJL v. SHINGLE R.T. DOS. NO. Isf �XE Ra4O ROAC 0,; 504'0417 "W RD. NO 10 N ,,0 BASS LAKE RD. 5717 OOS /09/.; (CO. RU NO, /0) ' -Z- 40.28 CREEK ' 532'49'21"W IV O I s INN, L 2 L=73.09 R- Y24.7Y 1,35,02" IGOOO 2 n CBRD-NJJ 552T CROSSI NG < L, A z 5 4 2 9 vn I IIRo Ire 15 R 3 — LINE TAB Mli­IJ - 7.1 TEN L 4- "5 4R N - 1 0 c —­ 12 -UU L 16 � Lt3 71 S __14619 ­­'OVE : LB6 2.' . P X 187 197.29 127 V 1111L. 13 E L89 __L67 35 4 2rW � 0 Lgo - M _,, - Lu L12 �6,11­ "11'41'24** - T Ell I N21-rR.. 17 R " G-I 0 WW 0 111. IYLU� SCALE IN FEET 1 o Ml"�, L997 I'D 874 _MO:A a A. ­­ - R,rm �rw L96,03 S64-37 23'W 1800 �2­9 L99 .17-1112'W - 2 4 S - 121 -T-265 o2 C2 2 L I 11.3 '4 -]2_3 _ 11- 221,37 117'1139'W 491 22 7' 102 o DENOTES I RON MONUI SET, L27 53-3 127'39 02 1IRKED WITH RLS 15480 • DENOTES IRON MONUIJENT TO 5627' '"S'S U.".'T MARKED WITH RLS 154130. UNLE O THERWISE SHOWN. FGR PURPOSES 3 THI T l G ­T. , THl IR. INE OF SECT ON . WN-1 RANGE 21 AND THE FAST II.E OF SECTION 2, TOWNISHIP 118. RA 21 0 Or ­27 f.'. M � � y- ':, \G , X 2 'I ll 25. x. NM'40'MT "166 Ro. I'Ca A'3. 13 "1 1 7' .4 GA� E AO G) L I'll 11 31 2 2- Z '1 0} / . / ♦ SB9'U SIE L17 1 .11 -4 L 31 N84 57 1` C) \ J 1 /BQ 00 0 k - L56 i zz'J]'w 7" Au 15 I'll, ­T Ss so 'o, OF DEQREA9Wl lADA4- (-RAC ".r 2-00) k, scaao 2'.OG' -- -w N B-060 A�E 9 -2- LSD -OOKL I'Al 8L D ". ". ) Ia (CO. I IV2 -�wW'w \ I K BLO P SrA TE 1. "1 R 21. AIL st IM44 HIGHWAY NOT TO SCALE JISUNDE NO. loo 1-m LAND SURVEYEVIG SB&T 2 OF 2 S"M MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE: May 3, 2011 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development SUBJECT: Update on the Planning Applications for the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development and Platting of the Brookdale Properties. Recommendation: The purpose of this work session item is to inform the City Council on the status of the Planning Applications associated with the redevelopment of Brookdale Mall properties and to provide an opportunity for City Council review and discussion on the revised PUD Plans, Preliminary Plat of Shingle Creek Crossing, and the proposed schedule for the Final Plat, PUD Agreement, Subdivision Agreement, and Tax Increment Agreement Development. Staff will be provide a PowerPoint presentation on the background of the Shingle Creek Crossing Development and the April 26, 2011 Planning Commission's recommendations that are now scheduled for the May 23 City Council Meeting. Background: On April 26, 2011, the Planning Commission conducted public hearings on the revised Shingle Creek Crossing Preliminary Plat and a new Planned Unit Development for the redevelopment of all of the Brookdale properties, with the exception of the Sears parcel. The Planning Commission unanimously moved to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat of Shingle Creek Crossing (Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011- 06) and a new Planned Unit Development for the Shingle Creek Crossing Development (Planning Commission Resolution 2011 -07). These Planning Commission items were scheduled for the May 91h City Council Meeting; however, the developer has requested that Council consideration be postponed until the May 23 City Council Meeting, to allow additional time for Gatlin Development and Sears to complete their agreement on the proposed redevelopment of the Brookdale Mall properties. Attached for your reference are copies of the April 28, 2011 Planning Commission Minutes, Planning Commission Resolutions, and the Planning reports. In addition to these two planning applications, the following Shingle Creek Development items and agreements have been planned to be on the May 23 City Council Meeting: - A public hearing has been scheduled to vacate old and unnecessary easements on the former Brookdale Mall properties. - The Final Plat of Shingle Creek Crossing and related Subdivision Agreement. Mission. Ensuring an attractive. clean, safe community that enhances the duality c?f life and preserves the public trust MEMORANDUM COUNCIL WORK SESSION - A revised PUD Agreement ( format following the March 14` City Council action on a previous PUD application). - A Tax Increment Agreement (as directed by the City Council on January 24, 2011 and discussed at the February 28, 2011 Council Work Session). Completion of these items will enable the Developer to close with Capmark Financial on the acquisition of the Brookdale Mall properties, close on the Midas property, complete their financing arrangements, and proceed with the demolition of the Macy's and portions of the Mall during the month of June. Construction of the Wa1Mart Site and first phase improvements are then scheduled to start immediately upon completion of the site demolition (estimated at 6 -8 weeks). Policy Issues: Does the City Council wish to have additional information prepared for their consideration of the Shingle Creek Crossing Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, and /or the Planned Unit Development? Council Goals: Strategic: 2. We will aggressively proceed with implementation of City's redevelopment plans tiftesion: f,'nsurit,g tin rattractive, clean, safe eommuniti that enhances the tlutality of life andpreserves the public trust