HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 10-04 CCP Regular Session CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY Or BROOKLYN CENTER
October 4, 1982
7:00 p.m.
i
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Invocation
4. Open Forum
5. Approval of Consent Agenda
-All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a council member so requests, in which -
event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in
its normal sequence on the agenda.
*6. Approval of Minutes - August 23, 1982
7. Resolutions:
a. Accepting Bid and Approving Contract 1982 -0 (Chlorine Room /Storage Room
Addition)
b. Approving Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Contract 1982 -G (Painting of
1.5 million gallon elevated water tank adjacent to Brookdale Center)
* Fund c. Amending the 1982 General t, d Bud g et
-This resolution would authorize the transfer of funds from the
Community Center Repair and Maintenance Supplies Appropriation to
the Community Center Other Equipment Appropriation to replace certain
equipment in the Community Center.
d. Authorizing the City Manager to Write =off Uncollectable Accounts Receivables
*e. Expressing Recognition of the Achievement of Jodi Lundquist, Miss Minnesota
T.E.E.N.
*8. Appointment of Election Judges for November 2, 1982 General Election
9. Public Hearing (8:00 p.m.)
- Notice of the propcsed special assessments on these improvements has been
sent to the owners of all benefited properties. Notice of the hearings has
also been published in the official newspaper.
a. Public Hearing on Special Assessments for Noxious Weed Control
1. Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll
b. Public Hearing on Special Assessments for Abatement of Unsafe and
Unsanitary Conditions at 6213 Beard Avenue North
1. Resolution. Adopting Assessment Roll
4
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- October 4, 1982
1.0. Ordinances: '
a. An Ordinance Amending Chapters 34 and 35 of the City Ordinances with j
Respect to Home Occupations
-This ordinance was first read on September 13, 1982, published on
September 23, 1982, and is recommended for a second reading this
evening. A public hearing has been scheduled on the ordinance for
8:00 p.m. This ordinance amendment would allow permitted home
occupations in all residential zoning districts as accessory uses.
b. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances with Respect
to Outside Storage in the I -1 Zoning District
-This ordinance was first read on September 13, 1982, published on
September 23, 1982, and is recommended for a second reading this evening.
A public hearing on the ordinance has been scheduled for 8:00 p.m. This
ordinance amendment addresses the subject of limited outside storage in
the I -1 zoning district.
C. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Rezoning Certain
Land to the R -3 Classification
-This ordinance was first read on September 13, 1982, published on
September 23, 1982, and is recommended for a second reading this
evening. A public hearing on the ordinance has been scheduled for
8:00 p.m. This ordinance amendment is the final step in rezoning the
land authorized through the approval of Planning Commission Application
No. 82020 submitted by Hussman Investment Company on Augusf. 30,
1982.
d. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances with Respect
to Minimum District Requirements and Special Requirements in the C -2
Zoning Districts
-This ordinance was first read on September 13, 1982, published on
September 23, 1982 and is recommended for a second reading this evening.
A public hearing on the ordinance has been scheduled for 8:00 p.m. This
ordinance relates to various recommended changes in the C -2 zoning district.
11. Discussion Items:
a. Effect of Homestead Credit on the City of Brooklyn Center
*12. Licenses
13. Adjournment A
i ✓tlivtlll;; Cdr 7 "'Iii:: P3:UC ;, _11:I; OF `11II, CT'1 Y C 01 iNC IL
OF T}i "t CITY i.i J'I.C )r l: lit ;iv`1'T,I 1 N T C OU.v %Y OF
IIE NNEPI, AT ND i'}i }; T'.i OF MI v v }_ -SOTA
RF(,I_11 "21}' :;T:SSIOIJ
AUGUST 2>, 1982
CITY JIALL
C j.1, TO OPI) ER
`1'he Brooklyn Center. City Council met in regular session and was called to order
by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:02 p.m.
RO_1.,L, CALL
Mayor Dean Nyquist, Cou icilmcm Gene Lhotka, Celia, Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Thews. Also present were City ManagE_�r Cerald. Splinter, Director of Public Works
Sy Knapp, Director_ of Finance Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning & Inspection
Ron 'Narren. City Attorney Richard Schiefier, Assistant City Engineer Jim Grube,
Chie of Police Jim Lindsay, Director of I Parks & Recreation Gene Hagel, and
Ad.ministrat.i_ve Assistants Brad Hoffman and Tom Bublitz.
IN
The invocation was offered by Counci.lmeraber Bill Hanes.
O PEN F ORUM
Mayor Nyquist noted the Council_ had not 3'_eceived any requests to use the Open Forum
1e:1sion this evening. He i nqu-r_ ed of they audience if there was anyone present who
wished to address the Council.. There heir-g none, he proceeded with the regular
agenda items.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Nyquist inquired if any of the Counci_lmembers desired any items removed from
the Consent. Agenda. The City Manager requested that item 8h be deferred to the
next Council meeting, in order to allow the contractor time to meet the specifications.
Councilmembor L,hotka requested that ite 8g be removed from the Consent Agenda.
P ERFORMANCE BOND RELE
There was a motion by Co;. ?ncilme nber. Scott and seconded by Councilmembe- Hawes to
authorize the release of the perf_orniance bond on Burger Bros., 5927 John Martin
Drive.
RES
RE SOLUT IO N NO. 82- -1 55
Member Celia Scott .introduced the, following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION DIESIGNATING CERTAIN TAX FORPEITED LAND IN THE CITY OF BP.00ILYN CENTER
TO BE USED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member. Bill Hawes, and upon vote bei_lrg taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof u Dean Nyquist, Gene T_,hot:ka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis, and tire following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resoluF4i.oh
was declared duly passed and adopted.
f>•- 2:3 -82 _ 1-
-ESOT,UTION NO. t32 - 156
DieTtibc.:s. C.el..La .�C.Ot'.t 1:itrodUc . d the following I olutl on and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PORTION OV CLASSIFICATION LIST 662 - NC
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gcne Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOL NO. 8 -1 57_
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION DECLARING SEPTEMBER 11 AS NATIONAL "LIFE. BE IN IT." FALL FESTIVAL
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill. Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESO NO 82
Member Celi Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION REQUESTING TII:E HONORABLE RUDY BOSCHWITZ AND THE HONORABLE DAVID
DURENBURGER TO OPPOSE ENACTMENT BY THE UNITED STATES SENATE OF SENATE BILL
S.2172, THE CABLE TE;LE -CO Mi'` UNICATIONS ACT OF 1982
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Ball. Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Lich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, *,whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed an d adopted.
RESOL NO. 82 - _15_9
Member Celia Scott i.ntrcduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER CONTRACT 1982 --E (CEN'T'RAL PARK. ATHLETIC
FIELD FENCING IMPROVEMENT)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
mernt,c -r Lill Hawes, and u - oon vote bei.nq ta'ren the eon, the following voted in
J_dVOi' thereof: Dean Nyq"l1:LSt:, Gtn(? Lhotka, Celia Scott, fi.L.x.l iia'.wC;.a, and RI..Ch
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly .passed and adopted.
LICENSES
ii re w a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Counci imembor Hawes to
approve the following list of licenses:
8 -•23 -- -2-
CIC;,T hET'1't' J,I("E aS!..
Thva_ �n Vcrrding 3804 Nicolle,t hve. S.
I�ie i.wet..%acr_s 2101 Free�, Blvd.
FOOD TI'. ;C: STiMF IJT LI(E;NP - 1-
Pizza Factory 61816 Humboldt Ave. N.
GP IV' 32';r'L7SE COI:.Li CTI0N LICEN E
Art I;i11.z: n & Son 62 26th Ave. N.
NON P E R ISH ABLE �7F,NDING Ia %aC INE I, I:C:E';ilSls
Mie:rnik Vend.inq�_. _ .7258 Commerce Circle
Marc's Dudgetcl 6415 james Circle
PER ISHA B LE V vD_i_NG MACHINE LICENSE
Mierni_k Vendi.ng_ 7258 Comerce Circle
Marc's Buck etel 6415 James Circle
RENITA D LICF.,N" :"E
Bruce L. Johnson, Wayne A. Johnson,
Robert Simone 5200 Howe Lane
Renewal:
Gale W. Fierce 5960 Brooklyn Blvd.
Ber'til G. Johnson 6107 Brooklyn Blvd.
Welcome COIIMMunity Home, Inc. 6451 Brooklyn Blvd.
Roland Scherber 5243 Lvi_nq Ave. N.
Howard Breuninge.r. 5401 Fremont Ave. N.
Raymond & - F'ri_trke 5452 Fremont Ave. N.
Elkhorn Partners 561.2 Irvi Ave. N.
Alfred L. Hassler 5519, 23 Lyndale Ave. N.
DeI_oris D. Hoy 5821 Lyndale Ave. N.
Ravmond & Grace Harr 6406 Scott Ave. N.
Bernard & Margaret. Gilvin 39.01 61st Ave. N.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Counci 1members Lhotka, Scott,. Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
'SOLUTIONS (C .
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -166 y
Mearzber Gene Lhctka introduced the folloctiing resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER FUNDS 1 ROTM TH GF NIIRAL FUND TO THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
The motion for- the adoption of t_la^ fore( resolut -ion was duly >econded by
member Rich Theis, and upon voto being to :"n thereon, the followinq in
favor thereof: Doan Nyquisn, Gene 1hotka, Colt a Snntt, Bill Haw es,'and Rich
Theis; and the following voted agiinst the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
*The City Manager introduced a Resolution Accepting Bid and Approving Contract for
Contract 1982-H. , Counc-J,'-lmenL-cr Lhotka inquired why the low bid was not accepted
on this project; The City Manager explained that the low bidder in this instance
did not provide a bid bond, which is an integral part of the bid.
RESOLUTION NO. 82-161
Member Gene Lhotka introducud the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FOR CONTRACT 1982-H (69-70TH
STRE'E'T, SANITARY SEWER, POD •AfER PLAIN iMP ROVE MENTS, CONSTRUCTION 010 EVLRGREE`N
SOCCER FIELD, AND ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROjECT BETWEEN DUPONT AND EMERSON AVENUES
FROM 53RD AVENUE TO 54TH AVENUE)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor - thereof: Dean Nlyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
There was a motion by Councilmenober Theis and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to
table consideration of a Resolution Accepting Bid and AVproving Contract for
Contract 1982•K (Fuel Dispensing Control System) until the next Council meeting
to allow the contractor time to meet the contract 'specifications . Voting in
favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting
against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
The City Manager introduced a Rcsolation Establishing Central Park Improvement
Project No. 1982-24, Approving Plans and Specifications and Directing Advertisement
for Bids (Contract 1982-L). The City manager reviewed the plans for the Central
Park Improvement Project, including landscape plantings and comfort stations. He
pointed out that the residents in the area are concerned with regard to screening
of the southwest portion of the parking lot and Have requested trees, rather than
shrubs, as screening.
Councilmember Lhotka expressed a concern over the number of proposed plantings
and pointed out that they appear to be quite_ expensive. The City Manager reviewed
the grant applications for Central Park and explained that a grant became available
after it had originally been denied. He explained the City was notified that LAWCON
Funds were available due to the fact that onother jurisdiction could not perform
on their grant. He explained the grant would be a 50/50 split with regard to local
match.
Councilmember Matka again expressed his concern over the expense of the plantings
and made a motion to not approve 0he resolution. The motion died for Lack of a
second.
Councilmemhor Hawes commented that he believes Central Park is a nui-,1)ec one priority
8-23-82 -4-
h
and that C��`:C;t7. :f?I.IIJ.iC1 s ho u ld I >^ };Y'r`;l%, ";,fd to complete t }..CC }jC'Ct. IIf ad .c Ca
that he believes CeII.Ual fix., :` };, will he a local point" of the en tire r::irea.
Councilmerber S cott stated s he a grees win C, ?uncilmember Hawes ana added that
matching funds were part of the bond issue.
Counc _lmeDDer Theis stated that a great deal of plantings were included in the bond
issue and that he would like to see. thL maximum use of the grant funds.
Council m._.1':lber Lnol.ka >tc;.ted that the puce per tree has increa considerably,
and that he is looking at the situation :roI'.1 the standpoint of where the money
should be best spent.
RESOLUTION NO. 82-162
Member Bill haw es intr0duced the f oiiC3vJing resolution an d IPove W its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISH INC CENTRAL PARS. I P ;O WCI' NO. 1962 - 24, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND D:F.iET NG ADVERTISEMENT FOR }SIDS (CONTRACT 1982 -L)
The motion for., the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and the
following voted against the saute: Gene L hotr:a, whereupon said resolution was
declared duly passed and adopted.
The City Manager introduced a Resolution Establishing Palmer Lake Basin Improve-
ment Project No. 1982 -25, Approving Plans and Specifications, and Directing
Advertisement. for Bids (Conl_ract 1982
j -� � residents the Palmer: .Lake
The City Manager stated that. a meeti ).ic�l� with of
area who were concerned over the propos trails along the southeast portion of
the park. He proceeded to review the Palmer Lame Basin Improvement Project plans
for Council members, including the alternate bids regarding the dredging of Palmer
Lake. He pointed out that tree removal would be kept to a minimum under the
project and he continued to review the trails, both existing and proposed. He noted
• wood chip path is proposed along the north and west side of the wooded area and that
• proposed alternate would be blacktop paths. The City Manager explained that
the DNR has required detailed ;Mans to be submitted to them before they approve
any proposals for Palmer Lake. Basin. He pointed out that many proposals in the
plans this evening are subject to DNR approval.
Discussion continued regarding the plans for the Palmer Lake Basin. Several
residents of the Palmer. Lake area neighborhood were present at the meeting including
Mr. ICipton Narbo, 6937 Oliver; Dan El:i_ff, 6931 Oliver; Barry, Brian, and Lorraine
Lofquist, 6925 Oliver; Alan and Nancy R lfinst:ine, 6907 Oliver; and Howard and
Harriet Oi.en, 6919 Oliver_. Mr. Howard Wen expressed a concern over the location
of the tr..a.il in the secluded area behind their homes, along Oliver, and also
expressed a concern over the possible molestation of small children and rapes
that could occur if the trail were built. He also expressed a concern over fires
in the area, and stated that he would rather see the trail connect to 69th and
avoid the secluded area. He added that he is also concerned over the odor of
the dredged spoils which would result from the dredging.
8- 23 -82 -5-
A petition was presented to the City Council from rosidonts in the area around
Palmer Lake. The petition expressod opposition to the proposed trails in the
Palmer Lake Basin area.
Council discussion continued regarding the proposed Palmer Lake Basin Improvement
Project, and Councilmember Hawes inquired whether an observation point could be
dead-onded before the trail enters the area that the residents are concerned about.
The.City Manager pointed out that there would be limited visibility from this area.
Council dis'cussion continued regarding the Palmer take Basin Improvement Project.
The City Manager pointed out that if the project is approved this evening in its
present form it will go out on bids. Councilmember Lhotka c0itm],ented that if the
Council approves the project to go out on bids, the contract will have to be
approved by the Council when the bids are returned. The City Manager stated that
he would notify the residents of the area when the bids on the project are in.
RESOLUTTON
Member Gene LhoLka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PALMER LAKE BASIN 1MPRONTS.'0J PROJECT NO. 1982-25,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOa BIDS
(CONTRACT 1982-M)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted ill
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARTNG ON SPECIAL ASSESSMFNTS FOR TMPROVEMANT PROjECT NO. 1982-02 KERXEs
ITS& 55TH AVENUE, 56TH AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION)
The City Manager pointed out that the contractor completed the project one month
ahead of schedule. The Director of Public Works reviewed the project costs
pointing out that the estimated cost was $415,050 and the actual cost was $298,171.52.
He proceeded to review the assessment zones in the project and pointed out that
notices of the proposed assessments and of this hearing have been sent to the
owners of all benefited properties, and that notice of the hearing has also been
published in the official newspaper. He added LhaL no written correspondence has
been received with regard to the assessments.
Mayor Nyquist open ad the meeUnq for the purpose of a public hearing on Special
Assessments for improvement Project No. 1982-02. He inquired if there was anyone
present who wished to speak at thn public hearing. No one appeared to speak and
he entertained a motion to close the public hearing.
There was a motion by Councilmemler Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
close the public hearing on Special Assessments for improvement Project No. 1982-02.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Llnotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis,
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 82-164
Mroduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
'member Gen(�
B-23-82
P0. 198 -02 (XERXI s
AVENa.J1:, 550U AV NIJE., 56'. n XSEHUE }.I C. . ;`I f C`:'I0N)
The motion for th :' DdopLioa of thn foynywing resolution was duly seconded by
II o1;b f Cel ia ScO tr and upon volt' being ,ng La e n t hereon, t following voted in
favor thereof Dean Nyqui t, Genf_ Lhot' a, Ccl i s Scott:, Bill Thies, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted agai zest the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was de clared d illy p assed sed and adopte
.
PLANNING C C)MMI:< S i ON ITEMS
J Z �L��1i' L !, C G��r r <>;�7 C� 1 1 dpi_ C Ar , ON 11 S 20 � SUBMIT r n- n EYE VAR IA NC E ,
h
_ _ _
a_. _� -� �15�, a,D �, 4� Rrr roR �� r _AZ�c�
; „C. l' T C' . 35-400 O THE ZONING ORDiNnEC T 1 ? IDW A TWO CAR GARAGE AGE; PO BE SET
BACK 25 FROM OM TIM FRONT PROPERTY ERT Q_.4 QN4 AT 57 00 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTP, THAN
e i� r�cvt o� o f
Planning anni ng & Inspection point ed out that the applicant had contacted
the City Manager's office and requcstV tabling ling action of the application this
evening due to a. family concern cal ling the ap plicant ou't o town.
`.inhere was a motion by CouncilTleI;.'3._r LJ7o; ka and seconded by Counc1-lmember Hawes to
table consideration of Planning Commiqsjon application No. 82030 to the September
13, 1982 City Council meeting at the req cst of the applicant. Voting in favor_:
M st, Cou.ncilr'nei he I hotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against:
none. The mot:i.on passed unanimously..
PLl�NNTNG (OYCI% TSSTON APPLICATION £ RCN NO. ? 3; SUDNI iTED B AD' ANCF CARTER COR PAT.tY
_. _ _ _
REgUESTING AN n til_. <D.. is SPECIAL USE PER0T APPROVAL TO EXPAND THE EXISTING RECREATION
CENTER-50 1180 RIRC)_ D.,l . - E 1 i7 '.L' I t;(; C i
The Director of Pia Ing & Tn _ ectyo a } . scnted. and reviewed for Council members
pages 4 and 5 of the August 12, 1982 Planaing Commission minutes and also the
Planning Commission information asset prepared for Application No. 82033. He
also reviewed the proposed project location and pointed out that he reviewed
the proposal with the Chief of Police, and explained there were no major enforce-
ment problems at the Piccadilly Circus and that the management has been cooperative
with the police department.
He noted that the Planning Coirnru_ssion's concern was over the outside exit and that
the applicant assured the Planninc, Comminsion it would be used for emergency purposes
only. He noted- the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the application
and that they reconnended app oval subject to three conditions which he reviewed
for Council members.
Councilmember Scott t _ a 1
tt n� L.1 _ . z whether , �v employees n�- c
inqu 1�eTt�_L � l�l adds. � s_onal �zl loyees � �u�d be put on clue
to the expansion. The appl._i_ cant stated that we have the number of employees
necessary to handle any problems and pointed out the number would be one or two
or possible three if necessary. He explained that there is always someone on duty.
Mayor_ Nyqui-st opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Planning.
Conmissi.on Application No. 82033. He inquired if there was anyone present who
wished to speak at the public hearing. No one appeared to spear; and he entertained
a motion to close the public nearing.
8- :23 -82 - 7 -
There w as �a.5; 1 I31cati_C7n by Councilmember Scott t a7 , l seconded by CC'L1i,C1llTomber Hawes
to close the public hearing on Ap I Li. "aLiun No. 82033, Vot "iIlcj in favor: Mayor
NyE=uistt, Councilmenbers LhoLka Scott:, Ua'wos, and Theis, Voting against: none.
The motion passad t.1,1<lll7H1ously.
There Was a motion by Co unci1membc?r Scott: and secon by Councll.ITI;_'T . ber Hawes to
approve Application No. 82U33 subjcct to the following conditions:
L The special use permit shall be issued to the applicant as operator of
the facility and is nontransferable.
2. The spacial. use is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations,
including Section 23-2115 and violation i }l .reo;_ shall he grounds for revocation.
3. House rules and hours of local cup E:e:a regulations shall be clearly posted
in the establishment and rigorously enforced.
Voting in :Favor: M ayor Nyquist, C unci._l ;ti_mbers Lbotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
R ECESS
The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 8:47 p.m. and reconvened at 9 :05 p.m.
PL.ANPIT`vIG COMMISSION APP L i'_AT t ON NO. 82020 t u BM T'C t.D BY I US.SMAN INVESTMENT COMPANY
AS A REgUEST TO _a,E TUOM R! TO M3 TWO P ARCELS Or i,AuO ON i 3Z SOUTH SID I N THE
PL AAtNTNG CO MMIS SION Ai P Lr a i 7, O 80031 A nn 82032 SUBMI - ,C i' D BY HUS i iii
- P I �
�C_ic a1ti1 7 7 I t_.
S�ii-VE OF 70TH AVENUE NORTH.
OUSE ' T
The �1,.octor for Council iieT ti r'_rS
pages 5 through 8 of the August -` 9 2 z I_::TlYi1.LiC Y
t - 1 � , 1 nth, n- - (;ti,.:.i.1.LSs.LG:(1 :tTi_1.Y111t.eS and also L - 1'1P
Planning Commission xnfos_,otzo.n s prepared for Rpu1i_cation Nos, 82020, 82031,
and 82032. He exp lained that cn A TusL 12, 1 982 the Planning Commission reviewed
the plat for the project a,ld passed r 1.anr ire .o,x«ia . si.on Resolution No. 82--3, titled
" R esolution Regarding Recommended Disposition of Application No. 82020" submitted
by Hussman invcs%ICent om .y.
(' <.1, ,te t`X1lc.t1_(,F:Ct the Pl C'.'?:t.r 1LSSGL1 3 :' cC;t1CF'_rn
Was over the landscaping plan conhalned in the site and building plan and added
that the lands caping plan has not Tee been sub mitted ed because the architect has been
out of town.
Mr. Russell F'ierst and Mr,. James .tom C 3.lta, representing the applicant, reques that
the preliminary plat and rezoning cons..(: u _d t_'2is ev ening, and that the site and
building plan could be laid over until the
landscaping aging plan is comp_ cte.`d.
`l'he3 Director of Planning k in peci on.. reviewe the preliminary plat and explained
this. t.. he appl icant _ -
_t la.€ '7:1t: tict;.; .�. t ?,ti;i.i_t rte. � „_.. X' +:�.�t_sr:� } Yi0]TC- G1,lllt�:��> A floC`.11 ?nr?Tas,
and tC?:9t:. they ha 't on w �. "r; i ' i �. City H added C.�i,`_t at the Aril
� x a L' �F P L -- 3 r1 - .t � C'l � i Attorney. ���� - f� c # }- 5 T
Planninq Commission me , inn a nushoc of the abuKing property owners o ec_.t£ d to
the zoning but that at tile ' 1 1 IK r r ood mectin a Y `lm ler oF '':.he objections were
alleviated. He � ! ,. � s u bmi tt ed,
_ :�I: j a_.7..I ".€ a ..it.., . i ... t. _. ,.. _ c;ii and , 1:'^ , Paul Rosso hav in
writing, t7 numb 'r Cis letters o bjeckWU to Khe r 2'{ ning
C .... j] di scass i on con applic, ions and the Director of Planning
& I, ,,tj rev th j 51 vpprov�..,! of the prcliminary plat without
approving the sitvand buildinq plan. jv exjdainnd the applicant cannot obtain
building pnrmits until a Rite Dad MOW plan is approved and the rezoning is
acco a
mplished. un expJined the prrLkmiro p
ry lat provid0s the basic layouts far the
n o th it me t h, u ptl, ac l, yonjo ir e ments as submitted. He explained
the jnrUon of the site and MIMI plan that has not been accomplished is the
submission of thn landscaping plun and lie required buffer. The Director of Planning
& min: poction noted the Plonning Cowmisnion held a public hearinq on a rezoning and
preliminary plat at its hugust 12, ID82 mccting.
Councilmember Lhotka stated he would like to handle all the applications at the
same time.
The City Attorney coiluriented that Lhe City Council could hold the public hearing on
the application this evening,
Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Application
No. 82020. Mayor Nyquist recognizpd Mr. Paul Rosso who stated that since April 9,
1983, he has presented information to the Planning Commission on this rezoning.
Mr. Rosso proceeded to review Minnesota Supreme Court rulings on rezoning cases.
Mayor. Nyquist recognized Mrs. Melba Fvan'on who requesLed Mr. Warren to repeat the
information on her property. The Director of Planning & Inspection state d that the
City's Comprehonsive Plan calls for a change in zonn from Rl to mid-density R3 for
Mrs. Evanson's property. Mr. Paul Rosso then commented that the northeast neighbor-
hood policy statement stated that the nonheast neighborhood is predominantly single
family. The Director of Planning K inspecUon stated that the northeast policy
statement is a carxy-ovex from the 1 GO
sive Plar, and that Planning Commission
Resolution No. 82-3 notes that it is nnt inconsistent with higher density development.
Mayor Nyquist recognized representatives of the applicant, Mr. Jim Merila and Mr.
Russell Fierst. Mr. Morila and T'.1°. Ficist stated that they would request action
on the rezoning and preliminary plat this evening, and that a two week delay would
get into a critical time with the wintor frost coming on. Mayor Nyquist informed
Mr. Mere la and Mr. Fierst that the Council was considering the rezoning application
and that their comme were not pertinent to the current public hearing. Mr. Horst
then stated that he would request the Coancil to approve the rezoning from RI to R3.
Mayor Nyquist recognized MKs. Melba Evan2on who stated that she was opposed to the
rezoning application. Mayor Nyquist then inquired if there was anyone else who
wished to speak at the public hearing. No one appeared to speak and he entertained
a motion to close the public hearing.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
close the public hearing on Application No. 82020. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist,
Councilmombers Lhotka, Scott, Hawos, and Theis. Voting against; none. The motion
passed unanimously.
Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing o n Planning
Commission Application No. 82032 and inquired if there was anyone present who wished
8-23-62 -9-
to speak at the public hearing. No ono appeared to speak and he entertaKed a motion
to close the public hearing. 0
There was a motion by Council, ewbor LhoQa and seconded by 'Pli(CJ_s to
.close the public hearing on Planning Coiii:m.ission Application No. 82032. Voting in
favor:, Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers 1hotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting
against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
Councilmelber Lhotka commented that he would like Lo handle all the applications
in one Council meeting. Hawes stated that he believes the Council
could act on the rezoning and preliminary plat application this evening. Council--
member Scott stated that she agrees with Councilmculer Hawes' suggestion.
Councilmember Theis stated that to would feel more comfortable in handling all the
applications in one meeting. The City Manager pointed out that he is
the Council meet on August 30, 1982 to address several items, including the convening
of the special executive session.
There was a motion h)y Conncilmomhor Lhotka and seconded by Councilmem-ber Theis to
set the next Council menting date, including the special executive session, for
August 30, 1982 at 7:00 p.m, Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka,
Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting ogainst: none. The motion passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
table consideration of Planning Commisaian Application Nos. 82020, 22031, and
82032 until Monday, August 30, 1.982 to allow the applicant time to submit the
required landscaping plan for the project. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Council
tie m1ru_r. Lhot1 a, -Scott, and,Theis. Voting against- Councili Hawes. The motho
passed.
IZESOLUTIONJS (CONT_CN�UED)
R_ESOL TJrO_N 17 - 1.C:5 ----
N) _17troduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
Member Gene Lhotka
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1982
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
number Rich Theis, and upon vote hAng takcn thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gone Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted against the same:: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 82-166
- AWduced the following resolution and moved its adoption-.
RESOLUTION APPROVING ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR TUE ITAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
INSURANCE TRUST DES AL !NSUPAMCE PLAN
The motion for the adoption of the foreqoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Gene LhoLka. and upon vote being takan thercon, the following voted in
favur thereof: Dean Hyqaist, Gone Lhokka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voLed ay"Wat the n3mp: none, wheroupon Wd resolutLan
was declared duly passed and adupue&
8-23-82 -To--
' Al wa, a motion by Councilmembur 1KAh nnd wecondcd by Councilmumber Tlotka to
tab )u considaraLion of a Rco"IuAcm 1, of planning Ca"mission
AppliCOLi"D O. 82020 submitted Q Runnno i corp any until August 30,
1952 to allow time for thu aiplican! tk, wmit the rulAred landscaping plan in
caDjunction with 1 Ave ann buildinj w for the application. Voting in favow
Mayor Nyquist, Couimi 1mvYQQi s Lhulhn, Scu �t , Hawes, and Theis. . Voting against
none. I hion r ased unanimnuqly.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MUNICY',ij, CA1 - -1, �S'ITE
The City Manager rcferred. Council mamimiq in a repoxt from the Director of Public
Works titled "Development Plan for Nanic.pal Service Garage Site." The City Manager
pointed out thaL the plan modified provions plans for the site in that rather than
maintain a heated space, the storage nrn would be a cold storage area. He added
that no action is required at this tite hut ihe item has been brought to the Council
for discussion purposes. He stated hc F&ieves the plan will provide better
coordination of we sites and wnul? uoumidate storage.
Councilm.ember Thcis expressed a conccin over the wall surrounding the storage area
and inquired if there were any oLber lovNtIons using this type of arrangement. He
added that he was concerned that hoavy equipment, such as a front loader, may
damage the wall. The Director of Pub Au Woyhs stated that St. Louis Park has
boon using reinforced concrete bins, and that the City of Fridley also has heavy
timber reinferced storage bip♦. Councilympher Theis expressed a concern and
reservation about outside storage. Ths D�rector of Planning & Inspection stated
that the Planninq Commission felt thp nntd for changes with regard to outside
storage, and that they also felt the City should set an example for proper screening.
The City Manager stated the staff will unucced with the Planning Contmission's
concerns re yap ding Ne rezoning aspect frr outside storage and will return to
the City Council with a specific financing plan for the project.
There was a motion by Councilmenber Scutt and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
authorize the City staff to develop the plan for the municipal service garage site
and pursue the concept with t I Me Planning Connission. Voting in favor: Mayor
Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, aud Hawes. Voting against: none. The
motion passed . Cot ncilmcm,'N-r ThAs uhst&ned from the vote.
NORTH CROSSTOWN CCNSULTING AGREEKKNT AND FINANCING
y -
Ma or N yquist --- r - eco I gn I i - z I ed - M r ------ T - o - d d G — 1. a i . 0 - K I I v - L I so - n f r on the Chalber of Commerce Economic
Development Committee, who stated thaL ti Chamber does support the construction
of the 610 North Crosstown and that thr business community has pledged $2,500 towards
the financing of the consultant. Hr ask the Council to support the project and
that he believes the North Crosstown wiAl benefit Brooklyn Center. In response
to a question from the Council, he paintod out the consultant will cost approximately
$4,000 per month.
The City Manag or sLatud that he undeistands the lobbyist will be used not just to
JoL)Ly for the 610 crosstown but to i so rot-urn other hiyhway funds back to Minnesota
from the general pool they are now in. Ke added that the North Crosstown project
is the number one priozity, however,
B-23-82
Councilmcmber Hawes stated that- h--' ycec NaL Lho North Crosstown will
enhance the retail market in Brooklyn Con� or will imywova local servi-pa truck
II accessibility. The City Manaqar nVaLnd thah 694 bridge is a boLtlenack For
many service trucks, such as NSP, dNA other husinessos located in the CILy's
warehouse area, He added that the North Crosstown bri?fn could providc an alternate
route for these vehicles, He added that 601 of the traffic on the 694 bridge has
a 3 to 5 mile destination either side of Uw bridge. Tn response to a question
from'Councilmember Theis, the City Managor noted that the project will be appropriated
in phases and that the first phase is the right of way dosignati Ott , the second
is the design phase, and the third is the construction phase. He added that the
phases would be accomplished over a pnriod cY years.
Mayor Nyquist recognized W. Lonn! McCauluy, Executive Vico-President of the
Chamber. of Cotnme,-ce, who stated that the Charber does not view the financin of
the lobbyist as a long term commitmeaL, and that she b2lieVaS the bridge will be
a benefit to Brooklyn Center.
Councilmember Scott stated that she has no pinb1cm with offering a one Lime
contribution but not at the level requestod, adding that she would like to commit
nothing over $1,000. CouncilmeRhar Theis stated that the business comumnity
appears �,Mivg to support the project and that ho would like to support them,
and suggested th2t perhaps the City could maLch thy business coNnunity's contribution
to a certain level.
There was a motion by Councilmomher Scott and seconaed by Contici-in Tbeis to
contribute $1,000 to the cost ok retaining a consultant to promote the development
of the North Crosstown bridye. 0
In discussion of the motion, Councilmember Lhatka stated that be believes the
project is a Waste of dollars.
C Cone? lmember Theis stated that, Yather than contri.huto $1,000 now, he would like
to match the business community as they cone up with thnir funding.
The City Manager explained that the City Council could set a cutoff date for the
contribution and stated that the contribution .,,__la bw up to $1,000 in watching
the business community's conLribution. Un added that the expenditure would be
authorized from the City's cont Lngy fund.
Councilmember Lhotka inquired whethor the motion c d he amended to stake that
the contribution would be a one time only cockribohion. Councilramber Scott stated
she would amend her motion by spacOying that rhe Ci Ly would contributQ up to
$1,000 to match the Brooklyn Cen r btainass namonnity's contribution to the hiring
of a lobbyist for the Morth Crosstown bridgo fon fanan contrlhuUd by Dacamber 10,
1982, and that further, the con AinvAnn would ba a ones Lime only co: ibution.
Councilmembor Hawes, as seconder oF the motinn, accepted the ajnenQn',y-,f VoLLt"(-
. J
in favorz Mayor Nyquist, Cauncilmawonrs Santo, Hawes, aQ Theis. Voting against:
Councilmewher ThuLka. The haLion passod.
The City Manager pointed out that thor are u uhsLract j woh! u ms d th
8-23-82
Earle Brown Farm Prof ccL. Hn add,d UP, a portion of the project comprehends
rumodAing tin k. e U the yunsL 1 wu:5( which was moved in from another location
and t Q closiIle in of the windowz an iin poych area. He added that the porch was
part Q Uhc house existing on the Nitc and was not moved in. Be added that the
field house was moved in along wi-du thu jareb area and that the project would
compicte the attachmont frcan tho it u:-;c 1, porch area. no added he is recommending
deferring the Yem oriel inq but would re Gomm ond allowing the screening in of the porch
area. He pointed cat the exturioi of tb building was undergoing remodeling and
that this was delayed while tho 10at wan t ing filud. The abstract problems, be
pointed out, were confronted while in the platting process. He added that the
request is now to complete the enclosing of the small portion of the porch.
The Director of Planning & Inspackion pointed out that the only thing holding the
project up is a plat which establinhes W historic area, which has not yet been
filed. He added that no building parmik can be issued until this plat is filed.
The City Manager added it appears the Ypjnvenatlon of the area is occurring and
that he believes a good faith Wort is being maae, and he would recommend to proceed
with the project.
There was a motion by Councilmenber Hawes and secondea by Councilmember Scott to
amend the site and building plan for t Earle Brown Farm to allow the enclosing
of the porch area on the main house.
Mayor Nyquist stated that he is concernod about the special request prior to the
filing of a plat. -Councilmember Lhatka then inquired whether the Council could
attach a condition that if the project in to proceed with the original remodeling,
the project would have to return to the City Council. The City Attorney pointed
out that if the applicant comes back with em, anded plans for remodeling, they would
have to return to the City Council.
Mayor Nyquist called for a vote on the motion on the floor. Voting in favor: Mayor
Nyquiwit, CouncilmenLers Uotka, Scott, Ka .e5, and Theis. Voting against: none.
The motion passed unanimously.
NONINTOXICATING LQUOR LICENSU APP IOCATFON FOR THE PIZZA FACTORY
The City Manager referred Council hanhuis to a memorandum and investigation resuwl '
for the nonintaxicating liquor license application for the Pizza Factory. He
explained that the applicant is t
prese n i rag t this eveno answer questions of the
Council.
Mayor Nyquist recognized the applicants, Paul and Elizabeth Aish. Mr. Aish stated
that he does not want to sell beer and pointed out that his wife and himself do
not drink, but that he feels he needs a license to compete in the pizza business.
He also expressed a concern over the Avestigati6n report and that he believes the
information is distorted. He ad ad that he is also licensed and bonded and sells
insurance in the state of Minnesota Pa pointed out that some of what it is in
the investigation report is true, pointino out that he did operate a football pool
in Montana, but he added that he did not hunt without a licenses as, the state
indicated, but that he had applied for a license before he was a resident.
Mayor Nyquist requested Mr. Alsh to refer to specific items in the report which
were not true. Mr. Aish stated that on pago four of the report he pointed out
that the Deputy MAU told him that someone else started the fire in Dean O's
B-23-82 -13-
Steak House an ldqhway 12 in MWwAsha CountV in souch Dakota. Mr. TKA also
recounted anothor incident cparted in the investkaMn Wort r0rdinq his
apprehension at a Holiday gas stnion in Brooklyn Park. to pointed out that
Judge Levine reprimanded the Brooklyn Park poJico aud nhe coon attorney in the
case, and that the charges against him wore dropped in this instance.
Mayor Nyquist inquired whether Mr. Aish c ould specify what percentage of the
report was correct and which was incourect. Mr. Aish stated that he believed
50% of the reporL'was incorrect. He pointed out that on the bottom of page two
in the report, the dog reforred to bolonged to a Mr. Burgoyne and not to him.
In reference to page five of the inyostigation, Mr. 'fish s e
stated that the person
who started the fire Dean 0 SL( House later ccmmitted .suicide. He stated
that Mr. Burns would not have inforRotion since he is with the city police
department and not with the county sheriff' office.
Councilmember Lhotka left the table at 11:25 p.m.
Chief of Police Lindsay stated that the ap2licant applied for the nonintoxicating
liquor license only three weeks ago, and Qat the police deparnment has not had
an opportunity to verify much of the information that was pzovided by various
law enforcement agencies.
Councilmember Lhotka returned to the table at 11:26 p.m.
Chief Lindsay added that the police department does not have enough information
at this time to recommend approval of the application.
Chief Lindsay slated that the polica department could send an investigator to
Montana, but no fee is charged in this insLance to fund the investigation. CounciAll
member Theis inquired whether thn apglicart couLd pay Lhe fees. The City Attorney
explained the applicant could agrne •Lo that. The City Manager stated that the
staff believes the report reflects inforoation we have received and that officers
have only accepted what was given the! hy other law enforcement agencies. The
City Attorney stated he would recovownd that, beca"se the information is so incomplete
the Council should take no action hecause there is nW enough information.
There was a motion by Councilmemher Lhotka and seconded by Councilmnober Scott to
table consideration of the nanintoxicating liquor license for the Pizza Factory until.
September 13 in order to obtain &Acquate Wormatioq on what the applicant has stated
and to verify or deny the statements made in ths investigation report. voting in favor:
Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none.
The motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Nyquist inquired oE the applicant whe%er he wuuld share the cost of the
investigation. Mr. Alsh replied th mos of his Puney was now tied up in the
business.
RESOLUTIONS (CONTTHUED)
The City Manager introduced a Rn Authorizing the Housing and Radovelopment
Authority in and for the City of Bconklyn Centur to Ukil&c tho Vower of Eminent
Domain in the Acquisition of Carkahn Boa! Property Kor the Use as r_t housing DuvelOW
ment Project. AdministraLive Hoffmon notad that 4hu resolution would authorize L42
HRA to utilize the power of emainnut dumnin. jot Mod thaL he ia continuing 01
B-23-22
nqqo�jatlons with Lho WAujor for th- hin ject, and he is hopeful that something
w ,,ls b ix tack to Lin am -L i Glng Qe projucL sowo[ in Sej)' emh)cr.
!',( ) out thah the only way TO rh-t Me Utle to the state land is through
candcmnaticm Ance Lhe stale doeq Am hold a markntoble title to the property.
tho foll resolution and moved its adoption:
IJUTHORI ZINC TOU SoUnjNr, j573 ljj)EVEjnPMFh]T AUTNORITY IN hND FOR THE,
CITY OF BInOKIAN CWTR. TO UTILIZE TKI! K701 OF EMINENT DOMAIN !N THE ACQUISITION
OF CERTAIN REAL r.. OP FOR TVW USE AS A jouSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
The motion for the adoption of the fw-aq,"ng resolution was duly seconded by
mcmber Bill Hawes, and upon vote being 1zhcn thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gone Lhotka. C scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich
Theis; and the following voted againnt the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted,
AW
There was a motion by Court cilmcnber SnntL and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
aajourn the meeting. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka
Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting againal: novc. The motion pussed unaimo
nusly.
The Brooklyn Center City Council adjonTand at 11:45 p.m.
Clewk Mayor
8-23-S2
DEPARTMENT
CITY OF
OF
LYN ROOK'
FINAN
ENTER
MEMORANDUM
}
TOd Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Director of Finance
DATE: September 29, 1982
r
SUBJECT:, RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1982 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
I have attached a resolution which, if adopted by the City Council,
will amend the 1982 Budget anO,authorize the purchase of replacements for equip -
ment in the Community Center which has recently broken down and cannot be repaired.
It also authorizes the replacement of a tape recorder which was stolen and the
value of which was less than the insurance deductible.
Money is provided in the repair buuget to repair or replace this
{ type of equipment, but since it is a Capital Outlay, and the acquisition of
Capital Outlay must be approved by the Council, it is necessary to transfer the
funds from repairs to Capital Outlay.
Respectfully submitted,
. .PWH : pk
'�'le Sa.xetlu.rg ?� ore (,,its
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FOR CONTRACT
1982 -0 (CHLORINE ROOM /STORAGE ROOM IMPROVEMENT)
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project
No. 1982 -27, bids were received, opened, and tabulated by the City Clerk and
City Engineer, on the 30th day of September, 1982. Said bids were as follows:
Bidder Bid Amount Completion Date
Hastings Builders Co., Inc. $23,212.00 60 Days
Maertens Brenney Construction 23,474.00 90 Days
Remo Caponi Cement 23,750.00 November 1, 1982
Kloster Madsen, Inc. 23,850.00 December 1, 1982
G.G. Kranz & Sons, Inc. 24,320.00 November 20, 1982
Superior 77, Inc. 25,150.00 January 1, 1983
Morcon Construction, Inc. 25,589.00 January 1, 1983
t
Falls & Nyhusmoen Construction 27,133.00 90 Days
Lund Martin Construction Co. 28,160.00 60 Days
Henry O. Mikkelson Company 32,300.00 75 Days
WHEREAS, it appears that Hastings Builders Company, Inc. of Bloomington,
Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to `
enter into the attached contract, in the amount of $23,212.00,
with Hastings Builders Company, Inc. of Bloomington, Minnesota !
k
in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project
No. 1982 -27 according to the plans and specifications therefor
approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the f
City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall
be retained until a contract has been signed.
j
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:
1. The esimated total cost of Improvement Project No. 1982 -27 is
hereby amended from $29,000.00 to $26,444.12. The estimated
cost is comprised of the following:
f
RESOLUTION NO.
` As Ordered As Bid
t i
Contract $26,000.00 $23,212.00
Engineering 3,000.00 3,000.00
Administrative 0.00 232.12
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $29,000.00 $26,444.12
2. The esimated cost will be'financed from the General Fund Budget
(Division No. 19)
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM. Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE. October 1, 1982
RE: Chlorine Room /Storage Room Bid
Contract 1982 -0
In response to Councilman Lhotka's request we have obtained the following breakdown
of project cost items from the low bidder, Hastings Builders:
Earthwork $ 882.00
Concrete (includes approximately 2,632.00
$1,000 for installation of
conduit for chlorine line
to City Hall)
Masonry (includes repair of masonry 7,521.00
on existing structure)
Carpentry 2,621.00
Insulation 901.00
Membrane' Roofing 586.00
Sheet Metal (includes installation of 1,024.00
coping on walls of existing
structure)
Caulking . 452.00
Hollow Metal Doors 1,764.00
Aluminum Windows 2,414.00
Finish Hardware 519.00
Painting 771.00
Electrical 556.00
Ventilation (fan for chlorine room) 457.00
Specialties 112.00
TOTAL $23,212.00
Respectfully submitted,
Sy napp _.
Member introduced the following resolution and 7b
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
E RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 FOR WATER
TOWER REPAINTING CONTRACT 1982 -G (IMPROVEDENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -15)
WHEREAS, the City Council entered into Contract 1982 -G with Dairyland
Improvement Company, Inc., for Improvement Project No. 1982 -15; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that certain modifications be
made to the contract to facilitate proper completion of the project, said modifica-
tion being as follows:
Repaint 110 feet of the interior of the wet riser Pipe of the City's
1.5 million gallon elevated tank in accordance with the provisions of
the Contract at the lump sum price of $5,184.00; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor, Dairyland Improvement Company, Inc. has agreed
to the prices for the modification as noted above.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota, that:
1. The above modification to Improvement Project No. 1982 -15 is hereby
approved and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized and directed
to enter into Supplemental Agreement No. l to Contract 1982 -G.
2. There is appropriated the sum of $5,184.00 from the Public Utilities
Fund for the additional costs.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: September 30, 1982
RE: Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Contract 1982 -G
Attached herewith is proposed Supplemental Agreement No. l to Water Tower Painting
Contract 1982 -G. The agreement provides for the repainting of the inside of the
"wet riser" pipe (the pipe through which water flows between the City's water tower
and distribution system). Preliminary inspection of the 5 foot diameter pipe by
Twin City Testing Company last spring resulted in the determination that only minor
"spot" corrections were necessary.
Further inspection, completed upon draining of the tower for painting purposes,
reveals significant paint deterioration. Accordingly, Twin City Testing Company
now recommends repainting of the entire "wet riser ".
Based upon the work to be accomplished, the Contractor has agreed to do this work
at an additional cost of $5,184.00 (1,728 square feet at $3.00 per square foot).
Our review of the estimate indicates the proposal to be equitable when considering
the difficulty of the work. Therefore, it is recommended the City Council accept
the proposal and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into Supplemental
Agreement No. 1. A resolution for this purpose is submitted for consideration by
the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
Sy Kn pp
SK jn
u()r 2 1.)4(5 -78)
STATE Of" MINNESO'T'A DEPARTtiIrN'I' Uh TIZANSPOIZTATION Supp. to Contract No. 1982'0
No. 1
Sheet 1 of 1
C ractor 1 1 lxV "o City Project State Project No.
iryland Improvement Company, Inc. 1982 -15 N/A
ress Location
1622 Mayfield Lane, Madison WI 1.5 Million Gallon Tank Adjacent to T.N. 100
This contract is amended as follows:
O '.
.c ,Q o
► O O
The Contractor shall repaint the balance of the wet riser of the elevated -tank
in accordance with the provisions of the Project Manual at the lump sum cost
U �
U w Rf
A of $5,184.00.
o
Yi5 a
•w
d� U
a
0 op
u •cs ..
H
Q
y 0 N
N U O
.O `0
U r �
�N3
�o
w
o �np
° ' ° 3
x
Y � N
w 0
O UP
u °0
h �
E o y
O
�^ a
ca
P Account I.D. Organization F.V. Requisition No. Vendor Number Type Terms Source S.Act. Task S. Task
Cost, Job or Client Code Amount Suffix Object
SEND
TYPE OF TRANSACTION a Entered by
A40 A41 Date Number
❑ Entered by - —
A44 A45 A46 Date Number i
APPROVED: Original Contract
Commissioner of Administration Dated 19
$38,300.00 Approved by Project Engineer or Architect
Dated 14
Accepted by Contractor
Approved as to form wid c\ecutlon Dated 19
Dated
District Director
Dated _ 19
Assistant Attorney GenciW Approved by .Agency h ead
1 - -STATE AU1)11'OK i IN'Aire origi+la1) 2 C0 N' FWNL' F0 It r Pit ik/ 3 AGI,.NCY iG Itl,wrod)
DEPARTMENT
CITY
OF OF
B.
ROOK F
ENTER �qq ���qq O tVl�IVi
1
TOa Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Director of Finance
I
DATE_: September 29, 1982
SUBJECT RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1982 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
I have attached a resolution which, if adopted by the City Council,
will amend the 1982 Budget and,authorize the purchase of replacements for equip-
ment in the Community Center which has recently broken down and cannot be repaired.
It also authorizes the replacement of a tape recorder which was stolen and the
value of which was less than the insurance deductible.
r
Money is provided in the repair budget to repair or replace this
type of equipment, but since it is a Capital Outlay, and the acquisition of
4
Capital Outlay must be approved by the Council, it is necessary to transfer the
j funds from repairs to Capital Outlay.
- - .:Respectfully, submitted, - -
PWH:pk
. "'7lct $aNCetlsc.rq 71l aze �� „
Member introduced the following resolution and 7(2r
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 82-
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1982 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
a
WHEREAS, Section 7.08 of the City Charter of the City of Brooklyn
Center does provide that the City Council may by majority vote of its members,
transfer unencumbered appropriation balances from one office, department, or
agency to another within the same fund; and
I
WHEREAS, since the adoption of the 1982 General Fund Budget, an exercise
bike and a rowing machine used in the Community Center Programs have broken down
and cannot be repaired, and one tape recorder /player was stolen; and
a
W11EREAS, there is sufficient funds remaining in the repairs and maint-
enance supplies budget to purchase replacements for said equipment; and
WHEREAS, all Capital Outlay Appropriations must be authorized by the
i
City Council:
i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center to transfer $1,070 from the Community Center Repairs and
Maintenance Supplies Appropriation (01 -4230- 383 -66) to the Community Center
Other Equipment Appropriations (01- 4552 - 387 -66) to purchase the following
replacement equipment:
1. Exercise Bike $ 395
2. Rowing Machine 475
y 3. Tape Recorder /Player 200
$1,070
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member ,.and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
nd the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
ti
DEPARTMENT
CITY
O
i
OF,
{
ROOKLYN FINANCE
.0 ENTER
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Director of Finance
DATE: September 30, 1982
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING WRITE -OFF OF UNCOLLECTIBLE
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
I Have attached a resolution which, if adopted by the City Council, would
allow me to write -off the City books $23,820 in accounts receivable which
we have determined to be uncollectible. Of this amount, $14,527 is due
to the General Fund and $9,293 is due to the Public Utilities Fund. We
have not written -off any receivables since the late sixties, so that is
why the large accumulation.
The uncollectibles represent a variety of charges billed out by the City
over an approximate twelve year period. We have attempted to collect them
and have recently tried to contact each of the accounts. It is possible
that some of these accounts may have been paid, but that the receipt was
credited to a revenue item rather than the receivable.
Of the total uncollectibles of $23,820, two happenings account for $16,291
of that amount. The first happening occurred in 1976, when the City sued
the Metro Waste Control Board over SAC charges. Our legal fees were to be
shared by a number of other cities up to a fixed amount. Unfortunately,
our legal fees exceeded that amount. We billed the other cities for their
share of the excess, but they were neither legally or morally obligated to
pay since they had agreed to participate up to a fixed amount. Some cities
chose to participate in the excess legal fees and three chose not to partici-
pate. The three cities receivables to write -off totals $4,745. The second
happening was the Howe Fertilizer Fire. As a result of the fire, the City
Was ordered by the State Department of Health to immediately hook -up City
water to Howe's neighbors who had private wells. This was done in an
emergency situation to prevent a possible health hazzard from possible
chemically contaminated wells caused by chemicals escaping from the fire
site. The City was assured that it would be reimbursed by the State for
the expense. It was not reimbursed. The City also provided round -the-
clock extra security service to the Howe plant after the fire to prevent
persons from entering upon the site. We billed Howe for the service and
they refused to pay because they had not requested the service. These two
,,.71e ,$dNCet�CUS9 X11 a're �� ��
Memorandum `
,• City Manager
September 30, 1982
Page.Two
items total $11,546.
I will be prepared to give further details on the remaining receivables if
questioned.
Respectfully submitted,
PWH:pk
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption: "'cl
RESOLUTION NO. 82-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO WRITE -OFF
UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES
1
WHEREAS, the City Manager has reported that the following accounts
receivables due to the City of Brooklyn Center are uncollectible:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center to authorize the City Manager to write -off from the City
records as uncollectible the following accounts receivables:
NAME INVOICE
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
GENERAL FUND
Phelps, Drake 916 1969 $ 10.00
Jess Beebout 942 1969 103.65
Concrete Specialties 1260 05/19/71 63.00
Donald Johnson 1587 07/05/72 26.25
H.W. Stenquist & Associates, Inc. 1626 10/13/72 7.75
Garden City Courts 1645 01/25/73 21.20
D.R. Raustadt 1646 01/30/73 133.00
LaMar Plumbing & Heating 1661 03/05/73 221.12
Diane Pierce 1663 03/05/73 60.00
Mrs. Gladys Peterson 1907 12/31/73 20.00
Joann Walker 1908 12/31/73 27.37
Metro Sewer Board 1915 1973 60.05
Allstate Plumbing 1921 02/27/74 203.01
Knudson & Trail Cement Contractors 1924 03/26/74 437.06
C.S. McCrossan, Inc. 1926 03/26/74 336.64
Minneapolis Gas Co. 2207 12/31/74 9.50
Brooklyn Center Bi- Centennial Commission 2490 08/10/76 20.00
Henn. Co. Alcohol Safety Action Project 2581 01/12/77 191.12
Gerald Stepaniak, Inc. 2774 10/27/77 170.63
Gerald Stepaniak, Inc. 2805 09/30/77 131.25
Mr. & Mrs. Mixer 3018 10/06/78 386.50
Howe, Inc. 3319 10/30/79 2,670.82
Gousha 3564 06/02/80 .75
Hank's Excavating 3568 06/30/80 86.78
Hank's Excavating 3569 06/30/80 247.91
Star Plumbing 3664 11/14/80 6.95
Minnesota Dept. of Health 3320 10/30/79 8,875.25
$14,5 27.56
PUBLIC UTILITIES FUND
Randy Lee 535 06/30/65 $ 47.28
Mrs Lofquist JV 126 Prior 1964 3.50
Union Central 563 08/01/67 20.50
Kathleen Stock 697 05/09/68 48.13
Nayes Construction 782 12/31/68 3.66
Belt Line Service 874 04/17/69 66.45
Biew -Con JE 8 1971 291.84
Gaylord Penny 1462, 03/27/72 15.18
Richard Aamodt 1535 10/27/72 85.38
Dick DeYoung 1536 10/27/72 196.74
Robert Moylan 1544 12/31/72 57.49
Herbert Applequist 1548 12/31/72 3.06
RESOLUTION NO.
Herbert Applequist 1456 12/31/71 8.37
Louise May Howard 1708 06/27/73 146.25
Janet Hanson 1710 07/12/73 123.07
Allstate Plumbing 1776 07/11/73 69.73
Richard Morgan 1778 08/29/73 29.02
Stegora Plumbing JE 16 1972 53.83
K -Mart 1790 02/08/74 81.30
Public Utility Constr. 1792 1974 -1975 245.08
Cal Corporation 2270 07/01/75 50.00
Daytons Home Store 2293 07/01/75 50.00
Bob Guzek 2260 04/14/75 57.37
Brooklyn Center Industrial Park 2527 09/21/76 50.00
Schramm's Brockdale Toyota, Inc. 2624 09/23/76 50.00
MTC Garage 2655 04/13/77 60.07
Mark Allen Palmer 2657 04/13/77 99.96
James Krekelberg 2664 06/27/77 123.93
Hennepin County Weatherization Project 2809 .08/31/78 44.64
Jay Steven Pastor 2819 05/03/79 173.20
Suburban Sod Co. 2820 05/04/79 1,981.16
Key Plumbing 3510 04/01/80 117.17
Gerald Snodgrass 3536 09/16/80 94.51
City of Edina 2400 09/15/76 1,208.00
City of Fridley 2501 09/15/76 1,872.00
City of Plymouth 2506 09/15/76 1,665•.00
( $9,292.87
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF THE ACHIEVEMENT OF JODI LUNDQUIST,
1982 MINNESOTA MISS T.E.E.N.
WHEREAS, on August 26, 1982, Miss Jodi Lundquist, a resident of Brooklyn
Center, was crowned 1982 Minnesota Miss T.E.E.N. (Teens Encouraging Excellence
Nationally); and
WHEREAS, Miss Lundquist will represent the State of Minnesota in the
national competition for Miss T.E.E.N.; and
WHEREAS, Miss Lundquist is also involved in many community service
activities, including serving as a Counselor at a camp for children with Muscular
Dystrophy and tutoring Vietnamese children in English; and
WHEREAS, Miss Lundquist has demonstrated an outstanding commitment to
service in the community; and
WHEREAS, it is highly appropriate that her achievements in service to
the community and as 1982 Minnesota Miss T.E.E.N. should be recognized and expressed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center that Miss Jodi Lundquist is hereby congratulated on being crowned 1982
Minnesota Miss T.E.E.N. and also that her service to the community is hereby
recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center,
Date Mayor
ATTEST,
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon., the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
A
scheduled to work the
The .following election judges are s general election (November 2, 1982) g
PRECINCT 1 PRECINCT 5
Head Judge D- Loretta Stewig Head Judge D- Geraldine Dorphy
R- Marian Smith D -Alice VanMeerten
D- Ardyce Matson R- Gladys Leerhoff
R- Mildred Egnell R -Jean Lindstrom
R- Marion Alford D -Joan McGonigal
R -Grace Freund D- Lorraine Halter
D -Vi Peterson R- Arlene Kemp
PRECINCT 2 PRECINCT 6
Head Judge R -Twila Hannay Head Judge D -Mary Martin
R -Ethel Irving R- Josephine Swart
D -Doris Bernardson D -Beth Rygh
D -Fran Cederberg R- Catherine Wetzel
R- Adeline Lonn D -Myrna Kragness
D -Anna Adler R -Helen Miller
D- Dolores Hastings R -Nancy Laffey
PRECINCT 3 PRECINCT 7
Head Judge R- Evonne Chatelle Head Judge D -Mona Hintzman
D -Kathy Hallerman R- Barbara Forder
R- Lorene McKusick D -Carol Benkofske
D -Ann Wallerstedt R -Dawn Kiefer
R -Kathy Dziedzic D -Helen Julkowski
D -Carol Larson R -Susan Heisler
D -Arlis Hassinger R- Jerine Polack
PRECINCT 4 PRECINCT 8
Head Judge D- Alberta Ruf Head Judge D -Ethel Pettman
R- Marilyn Foss R -Irene Thompson
D -Joan Hagemann D -Anne Bergquist
R -Frank Donaldson R- Jeanette Ulrich
R -Mary Meline D- Eileen Hannen
D- Robert Leach R- Dolores McGeorge
D- Connie Kaliszewski D- Delores Seal
STANDBY- JUDGES PRECINCT 9
D- Esther Durland
D- McKevha Thomas Head Judge D -Alice Madir
R- Delila Newman
R -Kay Commers D -Tracy Tyler, Jr.
R -Donna Bennett R -Jean Sullivan
D- Margaret Stellburg
ABSENTEE BALLOT PRECINCT_
D- Florence Johnson
R- Barbara Sexton
D -Jean Tubman
MEMORA
Date: September 22, 1982
To: Gerald Splint / e a r
From: Peter Koole ?J i
Subject: Effect of Homestead Credit on Brooklyn Center
In response to your inquiry regarding the status of the average value
home in Brooklyn Center in relation to the point whereby it exceeds
its 58% to a maximum of $650.00 State Paid Homestead Credit, I submit
the following information on the attached chart.
To summarize the data, as can be seen in the row of "Over or Under %,
Maximum Credit ", for 1981 taxes all areas were under the point where they
exhaust their State Paid Homestead Credit and start paying a full $1.00
for each $1.00 additional levied by the taxing authorities. For 1983,
I estimate that only the average home in School District No. 286 will
still be paying only $.42 for each additional $1.00 levied on their
tax bill.
During this study period, the Legislature has not changed the Homestead
Credit Formula as of this date.
cc Paul Holmlund
1981, 1982, Est, 19 Homestead Taxes
1980 Value Taxes Payable 1981
Sc hool Districts
#11 #279 #281 #286
1980 Avg. Value $58,989 $52,985 $52,698 $46,291
1981 Max. H.S.
Credit Poi nt $61,567 $63,207 $59,460 $63,157
Over or Under %
Ma Credit (4.2 %) (16.2 %) (11.4 %) (26.7 %)
198 Value Taxes Payable 1982
198 Avg. Value $61,950 $56,829 $57,363 $51,324
1982 Max. H.S.
reli Point $58,960 $60,017 $56,750 $61,528
Over or Under %
M ax. Credit +5.1% (5.3 %) +1.1% (16.6 %)
1982 Value Taxes Payable 1983*
1982 Avg. Value $65,825 $60,693 $61,200 $53,735
1983 Max. H.S.*
C redit Point $55,178 $56,139 $52,946 $57,514
Over or Under %*
Ma Credit +19.3% + 8.1% +15.6% (6.6 %)
* Estimating a 10% Mill Rate Increase for Payable 1983 Taxes.
Member introduced the following resolution and
91)
moved its adoption:
{ RESOLUTION NO.
� RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT NOXIOUS WEED CUTTING ACCOUNTS
TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS
WHEREAS, the Weed Inspector of the City of Brooklyn Center has caused
noxious weeds to be cut down on certain properties within the City under the
authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.271; and
WHEREAS, the owners of record of such properties were notified in writing
of the work done, and the costs and expenses involved, at least thirty days prior
to October 4, 1982, in accordance with individual notice provisions of Subdivision
4 of Section 18.271; and
WHEREAS, on October 4, 1982, there remained unpaid certain of these weed
cutting accounts; and
WHEREAS, an assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and made
part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk tabulating those
properties where a delinquent noxious weed cutting account is to be assessed with
the amount to be assessed; and
WHEREAS, said statute authorizes.the certification of delinquent weed cutting
accounts to the County tax rolls for collection; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City
Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to such proposed assessments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Said assessment roll of delinquent noxious weed cutting accounts is
hereby adopted and certified as Levy No. 8561.
2. The assessments as adopted and certified shall be placed upon the 1982
payable 1983 tax rolls by the Director of Finance of Hennepin County
to be paid in one annual installment with interest thereon at twelve
percent per annum, for a period of fourteen months from November 1,
1982, through December 31, 1983.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the Director of Finance of
Hennepin County pay the whole of the assessment, with interest
accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except
that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is
paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and
he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the
entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest
accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is'
made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest
will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate
of this assessment to the Director of Finance of Hennepin County
to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county, and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner
as other municipal taxes.
RESOLUTION NO.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
10
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PAGE t 6F
PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No. N/A Levy No. 8561 Fund /Code No. 01 -018
Description: Cost of noxious weed removal to those tracts or parcels where, Levy Description: WEED DESTRUCTION 82
pursuant to City :Ordinances, Section 19 -1601 through 19 -1604,
noxious weeds were destroyed by order of the City Weed Levy runs one years (from 1983 to - - - -- )
Inspector and the cost for such destruction, having been billed with interest at the rate of twelve ( 12.0 Y.).
to the property owner, remains unpaid..
Location• First payment, with property taxes payable in 19'F3
. shall include fourteen whole months interest.
Improvement hearing date Date of Assessment Hearing October 4, 1982
Improvement ordered on Adopted on
by Resolution No. by Resolution No.
Assessment District (from Notice of Nearing): Corrections, Deletions or Deferments:
Method of Apportionment:
Cost Summary (from Resolution No.
Total Improvement Cost
Less Direct City Share (Fund )
Less Other Payments -
Total Assessed to Property $120.00
Assessed to City Owned Property. 0.00
Assessed to Other Public Property 0.00
Assessed to Private Property $120.00
-- CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER -- PAGE 2 OF 2
MUNIC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTAL PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
LEVY NO. PROJ. N0. ADDN. N0. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME
IDENTIFICATION NO. PRINCIPAL. ADDITION /LEGAL ESCRIPT 0 MAILING ADDRESS
8561 O1- 118 -Z1 =32 -009 7 89950 $55.00 I 4 .1 5511 Emerson Avenue North Harold V. Paden
N 61.4 FT c/o Morley Brechlin
REIDHEAD'S ADDITION 5511 Emerson Avenue North
Brooklyn Center MN 55430
8561 10- 118 -21 -24 -0001 89010 19:00 Vacant Tri -State Land Company
an unplatted part of Section 10; c/o Soo Line Railroad Co.
Township 118, Range 21. Tax Department
Soo Line Buildino
Minneapolis, NN 4
8561 34- 119 -21 -43 -0014 89394 $46.00 5 1 6213 Beard Avenue North. Mr. Lawrence M. Ludvigsen
GARDEN CITY 5TH ADDITION 6213 Beard Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
NOTICE ALSO TO: Mr. Gayle Pierce
315 Clover Leaf Lane
Golden Valley, MN 55427
NOTICE ALSO TO: First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc
77 South Seventh
Mpls., MN 55402
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES'
Member introduced the following resolution and
I t
moved its adoption: E
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE COST OF HAZARD ABATEMENT TO THE
HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ROLLS
WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center City Council has caused the abatement of
certain unsanitary, unsafe and hazardous conditions on the property located at
6213 Beard Avenue North, legally described as : LOT 5, BLOCK 1, GARDEN CITY 5TH
ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA, (Property Identification No. 34- 119- 21 -43- 0014);
and
WHEREAS, Sections 463.21 and 463.22, Minnesota Statutes and Section 12 -1206,
Brooklyn Center City Ordinances authorize certification of the cost of such hazard
abatement to the County tax rolls for collection; and
WHEREAS q
the cost of all required work con tracted by the City
has been
tabulated by the Director of Planning and Inspection, in the total amount of
$5,789.04; and
E
WHEREAS, additional expense incurred by the City, in the enforcement of
the order for abatement of this hazard, in the total amount of $2,101.09, was
certified by the District Court, Fourth Judicial District on September 27, 1982 y
(File no. 793492) to the City Clerk for collection and after October 1, 1982,
remains unpaid; and
f WHEREAS, an assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and made
a part hereof by reference, has been prepared by the City Clerk tabulating the
is to be assess ed with the full cost
property where the cost of hazard abatement
to be assessed, to wit: $7,890.13; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the
City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to such proposed
assessment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Said hazard abatement assessment roll is hereby adopted and
certified as Levy No. 8562.
2. The assessment as adopted and certified shall be placed upon the
1982 payable 1983 tax rolls by the Director of Finance of Hennepin
County to be paid in one annual installment with interest thereon
at twelve percent per annum, for a period of fourteen months from
November 1, 1982, through December 31, 1983.
3. The owner of the property so assessed may at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
whole of the assessment, with interest accrued to the date of
r payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be
charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the
adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter,
pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year
in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before
November. 15, or interest will be charged through December 31 of
the succeeding year.
RESOLUTION NO.
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of
this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the
proper tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be
collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
r
PAGE I OF _2
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT INFORMATION LEVY INFORMATION
Improvement Project No. N/A Levy No. 8562 Fund /Code No. 58/041.
Description: Expenses incurred in,abating unsanitary, unsafe and- Levy Description: HAZARD ABATEMENT. 82
hazardous conditions on certain property pursuant to
Section 12- 1206'of City Ordinances and Minnesota Levy 'runs one year$ (from 1983 to - - -- }
Statutes, Chapter 463. with interest at the rate of twelve ( 12.0 X }.
Location: First payment, with property taxes payable in 1933
shall include fourteen whole months interest.
Date of Assessment Hearing October 4, 1982
Improvement hearing date
Adopted on
Improvement ordered on
by Resolution No.
by Resolution No. _
Assessment District (from Notice of Hearing): Corrections, Deletions or Deferments:
Method of Apportionment:
Cost Summary (from Resolution NO. )
Total Improvement Cost
Less Direct City Share:(Fund -; . • ). -
Less Other Payments
Total Assessed to Property $7,890.13
Assessed to City Owned Property . 0.00
Assessed to.Other Public Property 0.00 -
Assessed to Private Property $7,890.13
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PAGE.? OF 2
MUNiC CODE NO. 22 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATION ROLLS
PROPERTY TOTAL I PROPERTY ASSESSED OWNER
t£YY NQ. PROJ. N0. IDENTIFICATION N0. ADON. NO. pRINCiPAI. LOT BLOCK UNITS ADDRESS NAME
AD DITION /L EGAL DESCRIPTIO *RAILIN ADDRESS
8562 34-11 . 9-21-43-0014 89394 $7,890.13 5 1 6213 Beard Avenue North Mr. Lawrence M. Ludvigsen
GARDEN CITY 5TH ADDITION 6213 Beard Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
NOTICE ALSO TO: Mr. Gayle Pierce
315 Clover Leaf Lane
Golden Valley, MN 55421
NOTICE ALSO TO:' First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.
77 South Seventh
Mpls., MN 55402
COUNCIL ACTION NOTES
CITY OF BROOKLYN CL'NTER I 0 A
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 4th day of October,
1982 at 8:00 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amend-
ment to the Zoning and Sign Ordinances with respect to home occupations.
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 34 AND 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES
WITH RESPECT TO HOVE OCCUPATIONS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLIDVIS:
Section 1. Section 35 -405 is hereby amended in the following manner:
Section 35- 405 ADDITIONAL REQUIFUTjzJIS FOR HOME OCCUPATIaNS.
6. No home occupation providing day care shall serve more than ten (10)
children [who are not members] including children of the family
occupying [the] a Dwelling Unit in the Rl District, or five (5)
children including children :)f the family occupying a Dwelling Unit
in other residential districts (R2 through R7) This subsect is
not intended to supersede any lease arrangements which may be
more restrictive
Section 2. Section 35 -313 is hereby amended by the addition of
the following:
Section 35 -313 R4 MUT,=PLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT
1. Permitted Uses
(d) Accessory uses incidental to the foregoing principal
uses or to the following special uses when located on
the same property with the use to which it is accessory,
but not including any business or industrial accessory
uses. Such accessory uses to include but not be re-
stricted to the following:
(6) Home occupations not to include sp home
occupations as defined in Section 35 -9 00.
Section 3. Section 35 -314 is hereby amended by the addition of
the following:
Section 35 -3 14.. R5 MULTIPLE FP21ILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT
1. Permitted Uses
(e) Accessory uses incidental to the foregoing principal
uses or to the following special uses when located on
the same property with the use to which it is accessory,
but not including any business or industrial accessory
use. Such accessory uses to include but not be re-
stricted to the following:
(6) Home occup not to include special home
occupations as defined = Section 35 -900
1
Section 4. Section 35 -315 is hereby amended by the addition of
the following:
Section 35 -315 R6 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDED DISTRICT
1. Permitted Uses
(d) Accessary uses incidental to the foregoing principal
uses when located on the same property with the use
to which it is accessory, but not including any business
or industrial uses. Such accessory uses to include
but not be restricted to the following:
(6) Home occupations not to include sp home
occupations as defined in Section 35 -900
Section 5. Section 35 -316 is hereby amended by the addition.of
the following:
Section 35 -316 R7 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT
1. Permitted Uses
(d) Accessory uses incidental to the foregoing principal
uses when located on the same property with the use
to which it is accessory, but not including any
business or industrial accessory use. Such accessory
uses to include but not be restricted to the following:
(6) Home occupations not to include special home
occupations as defined in Section 35 -900
Section 6. Section 34 -140.3 of the Sign Ordinance is hereby amended in
the following manner:
Section 34140.3 PERMITTED SIGNS REQUIRING A PERMIT.
C. Residential (R1 through R7) Districts
(1) Home occupations and special h=e occupations in the R R2 and
R3 districts may have one freestanding or wall sign per dwelling,
the maximum size area not to exceed 2.5 square feet and the
height above ground not to exceed six feet.
Section 4. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon
thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 19
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.)
CITY Or BP.O IKLYN CL'14 R l
Notice is hereby giventhat a public hearing will be held on the s'�Z day of October,
1982 at 8:00 p.m. at the City Hail, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amend-
ment to the Zoning Ordinance , gaining to outside storage in the I -1 zoning district.
I �'
ORD�.��.,_�N
CF N0.
AN ORDINANCE kl�/EMTING Cf ?iER 35 OF ME CITY ORDINANCES 49I'T:i I
TO OUTSIDE STOP.AGE IN "':;E I -1 ZONIING DISTRICT
"Me CL 1 COUNCIL OF Try CITY OF BPOOKLI'N CE^I'"ER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLII KS :
Section 1. Section 35 -330 is hereby amended by the addition of
the following:
Section 35 -330 I -1 II\IDLUTPjAL PARK.
3. Special Uses
(h) Other non- co- inercial uses required fo the publ weLF-are
as deterr.Lned by the C Council, including acces
outside storage of materials when sc it - c_ public vies;
by an opaque wall.
Section 2. Section 35 -413 is hereby amended in the following nanner:
Section 35 -413 S EECIAL IWUIM S IN I -1 AND I -2 DIST - a C
9. Outdoor Storage and Activity
In the industrial park district (I -1), all production, storage, servicing,
.merchandising, except off- street parking and off - street loading shall be conducted
tai_thin completely enclosed buildings.
FE storage or storage of materials asso with a noncom erci al use
required for the public welfare which is not located within a cormDletelV enclosed
building or buried below grade shall be completely screened from view utilizing
earth or opaque structural materials. Said screening device shall be appropriately
landscaped and shall be aesthetically compatible with other structures and land
scaping on the site.
Detailed plans for said screening shall be submitted to and approved by the
City Council.
Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon
thirty (30) days wollot its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 19
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
( Und er line indicates new matter, 'krackot:-; i.nr it ter to
a
CITY OF BROOI.LYi1 CMER to c_
Notice is hereby give that a public hearing v7ill be Yield on the nth day of October,
1982 at 8:030 p.m. at the City Ball, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amend-
ment to the Zoning Ordinance rezoning certain land to the R3 classification.
ORDINAIICE NO.
A14 ORDINANCE - 7 0ENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES REZONING
CERTAIN LAND TO THE R3 CLA
THE CITY COU CIL OF TBE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOILUIS:
Section 1. Section 35 -1120 is hereby amended by the addition of
the follu., 'ing :
Blocks 1 through 5, Evergreen Estates Addition
Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and .
upon thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
dopted this day of 19
Inayor
Clerk
Date of Publication
vffect_ve Date
(inderline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.)
CITY OF BROOKLYN C'EN'TER / D
Notice is hereby give1that a public hearing will be held on the 4th day of October,
1982 at 8:00 p.m. at the City hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider amend-
ments to the Zoning Ordinance regarding minimum district requirements for frontage
and land area and special requirements in the C2 Zoning District.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES WITH RESPECT
TO MINIMUM DISTRICT REQUIRE AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE C2
ZONING DISTRICTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLU' ^]S:
Section 1. Section 35 -400 is hereby amended in the following manner:
Section 35 -400 TABLE OF MINIMUM DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS.
Every use of land within the City of Brooklyn Center shall conform
to the following minimum requirements which are applicable to the
Land Use District in which such use is contemplated..
(Note: Refer to applicable footnotes) _ Yard Setbacks (10)
(1) (5) (6) • (3) (5) (2)
Land Area Width (2) Side Side
District (Sq. ft. (Feet) Front Rear Interior Corner
R6 (See Sec. 35 -410) [1,800 /unit] 100 50 (4) 40 (4) 20 (4) -50 (4)
2,200 /unit
R7 (See Sec. 35= -410) 1,400 /unit -- 50 (4) 40 (4) 20 (4) 50 (4)
(11)
Cl (See Sec. 35 -411) -- [75] 150 35 40 10 25
(11)
CIA (See Sec. 35 -411) -- [75] 150 35 (4) 40 (4) 10 (4) 25 (4)
C2 (See Sec. 35 -412) -- [50] 100 35 (4) 40 (4) 10 (4) 25 (4)
Section 2. Section 35 -400, footnote (1) is hereby amended in the
following manner:
(1) In the case.of residential uses, the minimum land area shall be computed
and adjusted as follows:
[(a) Computation of the number of units on a proposed
site in the R4, R5, R6 and R7 Districts shall be exclusive
of the aggregate area of all yard setbacks abutting streets
as required by the Zoning Ordinance for said site.]
[(b)] (a) . . .
[(c)] (b) . . .
[(d)] (c) . . .
[ (e) ] (d) ,•,mere development is contemplated in IR3, :M, 6, ::6 or
R7 Land Cse Districts the minimum land area L-er dtelling
unit may be reduced, as here_nafter provi(ed, upon a
finding by the City Council that the following standards
have been Let:
The amount of reduction in rLdnimum land area requirements
shall be calculated in terms of Density Credits. One
Density Credit shall consist of the following, respectively:
Zoning District One Density Credit
R3 8 dwelling units per acre
R4 12 dwelling units per acre
R5 16 dwelling units per acre
16 [24) 20 dwelling units per acre
R7 31 awelling units per acre
Section 3. Section 35 -400 is amended by the addition of the following:
(11) Service /office ( ^l, ClA) uses abutting maj thoroughfares shall
have a minimums lot area of one acre
Section 4. Section 35 -412 is hereby amended by the addition of the
follo "Vi -I
Section 35 -412 SPECIAL REQUIRE2EM -S' IN C2 DISTRICTS
6. Access from a local street intended prima to serve residential
development may only be allowed upon a finding by the City Council
that such access will not negatively affect the re sidential
character of that neighborhood
Section 5. Section 35 -312 shall be amended in the following manner:
Section 35 -312 R3 b1ULTIPLE FAAaLY RESIDENCE DISIPJCT.
3. S pecial Uses
(a) Non- corBnercial uses required for the public welfare in an R3
district, as determined by Y the city Council.
(b) Planned residential develoFments canprising a variety of
dwelling modes as a special use permitted in the R3 district
subject to the following conditions:
(1) The minLmm, land area shall be [15] 5 acres.
Section 6. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon
thirty (30) days following its legal publication.
Adopted this day of 19
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
Date of Publication
Effective Date
(Underline indicates new matter, brackets indicate matter to be deleted.)
Licenses to be approved by the City Council on October 4, 1982:
ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
Brooklyn Center Lion's Club Brooklyn Center High School
Earle Brown PTA 5900 Humboldt Avenue N.
Sanitarian
NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
Minnesota Fabrics 5712 Morgan Avenue N.
Sanitarian c.
AMUSEMENT DEVICE - VENDOR LICENSE
Advance Carter Company 850 Decatur Avenue
National Amusement Company 3924 Louisiana Circles
Punkin Vending 3501 82nd Avenue N.
ief of Police <
AMUSEMENT DEVICE - OPERATOR LICENSE
Lynbrook Bowl 6357 N. Lilac Drive
General Cinema Corp. of MN, Inc.
.d /b /a/ Brookdale E. Cinema 5801 John Martin Dr.
Farrell's 5524 Brooklyn Boulevard
Pontillo's 5937 Summit Drive
Sears, Roebuck & Co. 1297 Brookdale Center
Beacon Bowl 6525 Lyndale Avenue N.
Show Biz Pizza 5939 John Martin Drive
Chuckwagon Inn 5720 Morgan Avenue N.
Brooklyn Center Community Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy.
Earle Brown Bowl 6440 James Circle North
Holiday Inn 1501 Freeway Blvd. �< n
.ef of cn -
Dir. of Planning j
& Inspection
GENERAL APPROVAL:
Gerald. G. Splinte , City Clerk
DE�ART'MEN
CITY OF
OF
BROOKLYN FINANCE
C ENTER
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Director of Finance
DATE: September 30, 1982
SUBJECT:- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING WRITE -OFF OF UNCOLLECTIBLE
a ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
I Have attached a resolution which, if adopted by the City Council, would
_ in accounts books 2 3 820 un
is receivable which
to write-off the City $ .
allow me Y
i# we have determined to be uncollectible. Of this amount, $14,527 'is due
to the General Fund and $9,293 is due to the Public Utilities Fund. We
have not written -off any receivables since the late sixties, so that is
why the large accumulation.
The uncollectibles represent a variety of charges billed out by the City
I, over an approximate twelve year period. We have attempted to collect them
and have recently tried to contact each of the accounts. It is possible
that some of these accounts may have been paid,.but that the receipt was
credited to a revenue item rather than the receivable.
Of the total uncollectibles of $23,820, two happenings account for $16,291
of that amount. The first happening occurred in 1976, when the City sued
the Metro Waste Control Board over SAC charges. Our legal fees were to be
shared by a number of other cities up to a fixed amount.. Unfortunately,
our legal fees exceeded that amount. We billed the other cities for their
share.of the excess, but they were neither legally or morally obligated to
pay since they had agreed to participate up to a fixed amount. Some cities
chose to participate in the excess legal fees and three chose not to partici-
pate. The three cities receivables to write -off totals $4,745. The second
happening was the Howe Fertilizer Fire. As a result of the fire, the City
was ordered by the State Department of Health to immediately hook -up City
water to Howe's neighbors who had private wells. This was done in an
emergency situation to prevent a possible health hazzard from possible
chemically contaminated wells caused by chemicals escaping from the fire
site. The City was assured that it would be reimbursed by the State for
the expense. It was not reimbursed. The City also provided round -the-
clock extra security service to the Howe plant after the fire to prevent
persons from entering upon the site. We billed Howe for the service and
they refused to pay because they had not requested the service. These two
y
" Xst .500(d4zNq 4ze ae#
r Memorandum `
.. City Manager
. September 30, 1982
Page • Two
items total $11,546.
I will be prepared to give further details on the remaining-receivables if
questioned..
Respectfully submitted.,
f
PWH:pk
1
I
ii; ,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: James Lindsay, Chief of Police
DATE: October 4, 1982
SUBJECT: Gambling License Application
Earle Brown Parent Teacher'Association
Attached please find the com leted
p police investigation of the
Earle Brown School Parent - Teacher Association in application
for a Class B gambling license. Named in the license as appli-
cants are Judith Ann Sodemann, Secretary, and Donna Jean Hageman,
Gambling Manager.
Captain Kline's report finds nothing of a questionable nature
during the course of this investigation. In addition to the r
application for a Class B gambling license, the Earle -Brown
School Parent - Teacher Association has requested a waiver of the
$10,000 fidelity bond. The City Council must act on the follow-
ing matters:
I
1. An application for a Class B gambling license.
This requires a majority �ority vote of the City
Council to pass.
2. A waiver of the $10,000 fidelity bond. This
requires a unanimous vote of.the City Council
to pass.
l
The following is a resume concerning the investigation of Brooklyn
Center Police Department case file 82- 14893. The application of
the Earle Brown Elementary School Parent - Teacher Association, Judith
Ann SODEMANN, Secretary, and Donna Jean HAGEMAN, Gambling Manager,
in application for a Class B gambling license as is issued by the City
of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota. This investigation
was conducted by Scott W. KLINE and transcribed by Pat SWANSON, clerk-
typist for the Brooklyn Center Police Department.
APPLICANT
The Parent - Teacher Association of the Earle Brown School
5900 Humboldt Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Telephone: 561 -4480
Judith Ann SODEMANN
-6024 Camden Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Telephone: 560 -2955
Donna Jean HAGEMAN
5401 Queen Avenue North ?
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Telephone: 566 -6946
INVESTIGATION MATERIALS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS CASE FILE INCLUDE
An application for a gambling license.
An application for a gambling license, Part II in the name of
Judith Ann SODEMANN
An application for a gambling license, Part II in the name of
Donna Jean HAGEMAN
A letter addressed to whom it may concern .requesting waiver of a
$10,000 fidelity bond
A copy of the bylaws of the Earle Brown Elementary Parent- Teacher
Assocaition as amended 1978
The Earle Brown Elementary School Parent - Teacher Association is a local
unit of the Parent - Teacher Association organized under the authority, of
the National Congress of Parents and Teachers. This association exists
as an unincorporated association of its membership. The Earle Brown
Parent - Teacher Association is housed and holds its regular meetings at
the Earle Brown Elementary School which is located at 5900 Humboldt Ave-
nue North within f i of Brooklyn the corporate limits o the City P Y n Center Y
Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Earle Brown Parent - Teacher Association
-has been -in existance for more than the required 36 months, however, the
date of the organization is unavailable at this time. Bylaws of the
organization were amended in 1978 indicating organization prior to that
date. The Earle Brown Parent - Teacher Association has an active member-
ship of 255 and draws its membership from the parents and teachers of
the Earle Brown Elementary School. $
ffi
t
Resume by Captain Scott W. Kline, Case File #82 -14893 Page 2
The Earle Brown Elementary School Parent - Teacher Association did obtain
a Class B gambling license from the City of Brooklyn Center in 1979,
1980, and 1981 and did comply with the filing of report forms as required
by the statutes of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City
of Brooklyn Center. Moreover, the records of the Brooklyn Center Police
Department indicate that the Earle Brown Parent - Teacher Association did
file Form 990 with the Internal Revenue Service in the year 1979. How-
ever, no form was filed for the year 1980 or 1981. The Earle Brown
Elementary School Parent- Teacher Association was exempt from filing Form
990 as they did not raise over $10,000 in the calendar year nor did they
employ a professional fund raiser during that period of time. In 1979
and in 1980, as in 1981, no charitable report form was filed with the
Commerce Department of the State of Minnesota due to the amount raised
and the fact that no professional fund - raiser was employed.
Judity Ann SODEMANN, the Secretary of the Earle Brown Parent- Teacher
Association made application for a Class B gambling icense on behalf
PP g
g
of the Earle Brown Elementary School Parent- Teacher Association. SODEMANN
is a resident of the City of Brooklyn Center and has lived at 6024 Camden
Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, since September of 1970. Cur-
rently Mrs. SODEMANN is a housewife having been previously employed by
Ansarri Abrasives of Brooklyn Center, GRACO of Brooklyn Center and LaMaur,
Inc. of Fridley during the past ten (10) years. In checking the records
of the Brooklyn Center Police Department, Hennepin County Sheriff's Office,
Warrant Division, NCIC, MINCIS and Central Record Files of the State of
Minnesota nothing of a criminal or.questionable nature was found under
the name of Judith Ann SODEMANN. Judith Ann SODEMANN holds a valid
driver's license in the State of Minnesota as well and has no violations.
Donna Jean HAGEMAN, likewise is named in the application as Gambling
Manager. Mrs. HAGEMAN is also a resident of the City of Brooklyn Center
having lived at 5401 Queen Avenue North since February 1, 1977.
Prior
to that time, Mrs. HAGEMAN lived at 805 18th Avenue North, St. Paul,
Minnesota, from September 1, 1970, to January 31, 1977. Mrs. HAGEMAN
is currently a housewife although she did work for the past two (2)
years as an elementary school media specialist with the White Bear Lake
School District and prior to that time for a short period of time,
worked as a bookstore clerk for B. Dalton 's at Brookdale. Mrs.
HAGEMAN
has no record of any criminal or suspect activity with the Brooklyn Cen-
ter Police Department, NCIC, MINCIS, Hennepin County Sheriff's Office,
Warrant Division or Central Files of the State of Minnesota. Mrs.
HAGEMAN holds a valid Minnesota driver's license and has received only
one (1) violation for speeding.
Accompanying the application for a Class B gambling license.for the
Earle Brown Elementary School Parent- Teacher Association is a letter
addressed to whom it may concern and requests that the City Council
waive a $10,000 fidelity bond as required by State Statute and City
Ordinance. Such a waiver must be approved unanimously by the City
Council. It should be noted that Captain KLINE finds nothing which
would preclude the issuance of a Class B gambling license to the Earle
Brown Parent- Teacher Association, its Secretary Judith Ann SODEMANN,
Resume by Captain Scott W. KLINE Case File #82 -14893 Page 3
or Gambling Manager, Donna Jean HAGEMAN.
The City Council must act on the following two (2) matters. The appli-
cation for a Class B gambling license'which requires a majority vote
of the City Council to pass and the waiver of a $10,000 fidelity bond
which requires a unanimous vote of the City Council to pass.
. e
PA TM ENT
✓ CITY
OF
t
ROOK N A N
��1V�11 VCE
fi � •
a
ENT
MEMORANDUM
i
TOo Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
—_
FROM: Director of Finance
DATE.: September 29, 1982
{
SUBJECT RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1982 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
1
I have attached a resolution which, if adopted by the City Council,
will amend the 1982 Budget anc. authorize the purchase of replacements for equip-
ment in the Community Center which has recently broken down and cannot be repaired.
It also authorizes the replacement of a tape recorder which was stolen and the
value of which was less than the insurance deductible.
- Money is provided in the repair budget to repair or replace this
I type of equipment, but since it is a Capital Outlay, and the acquisition of
Capital Outlay must be approved by the Council, it is necessary to transfer the
funds from repairs to Capital Outlay.
Respectfully.submitted,-
. PWH : pk
:a ��tG ,S4�sCilteKg �14Zt �t� ••