HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 07-12 CCP Regular Session CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
JULY 12, 1982
. 7:00 p.m.
(fir 5 (2 `f
Call to Order -
Roll Call
Invocation
Open Forum
Approval of Consent Agenda
-All items listed with an asterisk are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a council. member so requests, in which
event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in
its normal sequence on the agenda.
Approval of Minutes - June 28, 1982
*�7 Crime Prevention Program
-Mr. Phil Cohen, President of the Crime Prevention Program, has requested to
address the Council to discuss the program.
R solutions:
Accepting Bid - Central Park Improvement Project No. 1982 -12 (Athletic
Field Fencing Construction) Contract 1982 - E
>-W -This resolution comprehends the outfield and 'sideline fencing for the
baseball softball fields in Central Park.
* Accepting Bid - Neighborhood Parks Improvement Project No. 1982 -13 (Drinking
a
Fountain Installation) Contract 1982 -F
�2 5 -The drinking fountains included in this resolution will be located at various
parks throughout the City.
C. Establishing Evergreen Park Soccer Field Improvement Project No. 1982 -16
�26 d. Establishing Park Shelter. Improvement Project No. 1982 -17 (Grandview, North-
port, and Happy Hollow Shelter Improvements;; Approving Plans and Specifi
cations and Ordering Advertisement for Bids (Contract 1982 =I)
-This resolution comprehends the remodeling of the shelter buildings at
r 2 $ Grandview, Northport, and Happy Hollow Parks.
' t
Amending the 198 ?..General Fund Budget.
-This resolution would provide for the purchase of a plan file.cabinet
which would be substituted for the previously approved flat file cabinet
t system.
f. Approving specifications for Upgrading Municipal Communications System and
Ordering Advertisement for Bids
-This resolution comprehends the upgrading of the City's radio communications
system,.including the police /fire dispatch center..
cF-•
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- July 12, 1982
g. Approving Plans and Specifications for Remodeling Police Department
,A Dispatch Area and Ordering Advertisement for Bids
41 -This resolution provides for the necessary remodeling of the dispatch
� � 0 area.required to accommodate the upgraded communication system.
9. Public Hearing - 8:00 p.m.
Alley Improvement Project No. 1982 -14 (Between Dupont and Emerson Avenues
C from 53rd to 54th Avenues)
a. Resolution Ordering Alley Improvement Project No. 1982 -14
Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement
for Bids - 69th -70th Street Improvement Project No. 1982 -09, Sanitary
Sewer Improvement Project No. 1982 - 10, Water Main Improvement Project
No. 1982 - 11, Alley Improvement Project No. 1982 -14, Evergreen Park Soccer
Field Improvement Project No. 1982 -16 (Contract 1982 -H)
10. Planning Commission Items (8:30 p.m.)
a. Planning Commission Application No. 82028 submitted by Deborah Tobak^ ;_
for a special use permit to conduct ceramics classes in the basement
of the residence at 5636 Girard Avenue North. The Planning Commission
recommended approval of Application No. 82028 at its July 1, 1982 meeting.
11. Discussion Items:
a. Report on the Open Forum Request Made by Mr. Jesse Sandoval at the
j June 28, 1982 City Council Meeting Concerning Section 1 -106 of the
City Ordinances Regarding Limiting the Number of Dogs Per Household.
b. Executive Session Regarding Wage Negotiations
12. Consideration of Specified Licenses
a. Liquor License - T. Wrights, 5800 Shingle Creek Parkway
I I _
13. Licenses
14. Adjournment
Note: At 6:30 p.m• before the Council meeting several pieces of fire and police
department equipment will be on display at the front entrance to City Hall. The
equipment includes a ladder the new fire pumper,, fire department.salvage
truck and a police squad car.
4
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
JUNE 28, 1982
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by
Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:04 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich~
Theis. Also present were City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Works Sy
Knapp, Director of Finance Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning & Inspection Ron
Warren, Director of Parks& Recreation Gene Hagel, City Attorney Richard Schieffer,
Assistant City Engineer Jim Grube, and Administrative Assistant Tom Bublitz.
INVOCATION
The invocation was offered by Councilmember Theis.
OPEN FORUM °
Mayor Nyquist noted the. Council had received a,request to use the Open Forum session
this evening from Jesse and Patricia Sandoval, 5548 Logan Avenue North. Mayor
_ Nyquist recognized Mr_. Sandoval who explained he lives at 5548 Logan Avenue North
and that this past Friday he received a letter from the City regarding a complaint -
• concerning a violation of the City Ordinance Section 1 -106, which regulates the
number of dogs per household which can be kept in the City. He explained he .has five
small poodles at his home and that they have never left his yard, and present no
problem to the neighborhood_._ He added he tried to give -three of the younger dogs
away, and that they all were returned to him. He explained all the dogs have been
spayed or neutered. He explained he was upset about the anonymous call which
initiated the complaint and questioned why this individual could not speak to him-
directly if there was a problem. He requested the City Council to :somehow make it
possible for him to keep his dogs.
Mayor Nyquist recognized Patricia Sandoval, who explained that the younger dogs
have been with them for three years and the neighbors have offered to sign a petition
stating the dogs are not a nuisance. She explained the dogs do not leave their yard.,
and that she wished the ordinance could be changed so her family could keep the dogs. -
The City Manager explained' the City ordinance is designed to protect the
neighborhood from persons who may not take care of their dogs as well as the
Sandovals. He explained the staff would look at the ordinance to see what can be
done to help Mr. Sandoval and to prepare a report to the Council in two weeks.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR SESSION JUNE 14, 1982, BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, JUN1 7
1982
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve the minutes of the City Council meeting of June 14, 1982 as submitted.`
Voting in favor: :Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, and Theis.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
6-28 -82 -1-
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve the minutes of the Board of Equalization meeting of June 7, 1982 as
submitted. Voting in favor: t,ayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes,
and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASES
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve the performance bond release for Thrifty Scot Motel, 6445 James Circle, in '
the amount of $$,000. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka,
Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve the performance bond release for Lutheran Church of the Master, 1200 - 69th.
Avenue North, in the amount of $6,000. Voting in 'favor: Mayor Nyquist,
Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. .The motion
passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve the performance bond release for Federal Lumber, 4810 North Lilac Drive, in
the amount of $25,000. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka,
Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
RESOLUTIONS
The City Manager introduced a Resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of
Plans and Specifications for 51st Avenue North Water Main Improvement Project No.
1982 -u7.
The Director of Public Works reviewed the proposed project and noted that it was 5
initiated by the property owner, Mr. Ron Brixius, 4100' 51st Avenue North. He
explained that Mr. Keith Harstad has presented a preliminary plat for the
development of his property along 51st, but that it became obvious in discussions
with Mr. Harstad that the economics of the plat and the installation of all the
necessary improvements do not appear economically feasible. He added that it is
also questionable whether any benefit could be proved for the Tri -State property.
He added the most feasible approach would appear to be to plan for the development of
all vacant property in the area including the Tri -State land. He explained Mr.
Harstad has contacted the Tri -State Land Company regarding the purchase of their
property.
The Director of Public Works noted there are other wells in the area, one of which is
between 100 and 200 feet deep, is tested annually, and has proven to be potable
water. He explained the estimated cost of a well at 100 to 200 feet in depth would be
approximately $2,000 to $3,000. He added that Mr. Brixius is concerned about ,
spending.the $2,000 to $3,000 for the well, then later being required to pay an
assessment if City water is brought to the property. The Director of Public Works
pointed out assessments can be levied against the Brixius and Harstad property to
recover approximately one -half the cost of the project. Councilmember Lhotka
commented the alternatives appear to be to spend a great amount to bring water to the
property or to drill a well at a lesser cost. The City Manager stated if City funds
are•used to drill a well, it would have to be a public well and this is not an
advisable solution; The Director of Public Works also pointed out if a public well is
created, the maintenance would be very expensive to operate, given. the criteria for
maintaining a public •water supply. The City Attorney added a public well is really
not a workable solution and stated, in his opinion, the alternatives appear to be to
z
6 -28 -82 -2
have the owner drill his own well or to have the City put in the water line, assess the
properties, and have the City pick up one -half of the total cost. The Director of
Public Works pointed out, in addition to construction costs, some easement costs may
also.be incurred in the project.
The City Attorney posed the possibility of assessing the project and deferring the
assessment on the Tri -State land property. He added the assessment roll could be
proposed and the project could be delayed until any appeals are made and an easement
is negotiated. The Director of Public Works stated, if the easement went to
condemnation the project could probably not be built this year.
Councilmember Lhotka inquired what the City's obligation, was with regard to
providing sewer and water. The City Attorq#y- stated; the property owner requested
the project in this case, and the City has ah obligation to install the project if it
is feasible. He added the property owners can then be assessed for the project and
that tonight's discussion is intended to determine the feasibility of the project. -
RESOLUTION N0, 82 -118
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adopt:'nn::: > --
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FflR
51ST AVENUE NORTH WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -07
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member -
Celia Scott. _ The Council continued to discuss the project and there was a general
concern among Council members regarding the cost of the project. Councilmember
Lhotka stated that he feels an obligation to provide water to the property but that -
he is also concerned with the cost of the project.
Mayor Nyquist noted a four /fifths roll call vote is required -to order the project
constructed. He- proceeded with the roll call vote, Councilmember Hawes stated he.
- is voting yes on the resolution but qualified his vote with the condition that one-
-half of the cost of the project would be asessed immediately. Councilmember Scott-
voted yes. Councilmember Lhotka voted yes. Councilmember Theis voted no and stated
he -believes the action could be delayed to consider development of the
property the area and also to continue testing the water in the area. Mayor
z - Nyquist voted yes. The resolution was declared duly-passed and adopted :by a
four /fifths -roll call vote.'
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS.
PLANNIN:G APPLICATION NO. 82024 SUBMITTED BY DEVRIES BUILDERS, INC. FOR
SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT 16 TOWNHOUSES UNITS IN THE EARLE
FARM ESTATES.; 3RD ADDITION
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 82025 SUBMITTED BY` DEVRIES BUILDERS, INC. FOR
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE OUTLOT B_ OF THE EARLE BROWN FARM ESTATES, 1ST
ADDITION INTO A NEW 3RD ADDITION WITH 16 TOWNHOUSE UNITS AND ONE COMMON AREA
The Director of-Planning and Inspection presented and reviewed for Counoil members
pages 1 through 4 of the June 17, 1982 Planning Commission minutes and also the
Planning Commission information sheet prepared for Application' Nos. 82024. and
82025. He explained that the first and second addition in the Earle Brown Farm
Estates Development were approved in 1981. He .reviewed the preliminary plat for `
j
b -28-82 -3
Council members and also the parking and landscaping plan for the 3rd addition,
pointing out that essentially the plans are the same as the master plan approved by
the Council in 1981.
The Director of Planning and Inspection stated the Planning Commission recommended
approval of Application No. 82024 after a public hearing and subject to eight
conditions which he reviewed for Council- members. He stated the Planning
Commission approved Application No..82.025..subject to three conditions which he
reviewed for Council members. _
The Director,of Planning and Inspection stated Mr. DeVries,has also submitted a
finalplat for approval this evening. The Director of Public.Works stated the final.
plat submitted by Mr. DeVries conforms to City requirements, and the staff
recommends approval.
L
Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of -a public hearing on Application
No. 82025. Be inquired if there was anyone present who wished to speak at the public
hearing. 'No one appeared to speak and he entertained a motion to close the public
hearing.
i, There was -a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Scott to
close the public hearing on Application No. 82025. Voting in favor: Mayor
. Nyquist, Councilmembers- Lhotka,- Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none.
The motion passed unanimously.
i
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
approve Application No. 82024 subject to the following conditions:
1. Building - plans are subject to review and approval by the
Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to
the issuance of permits.
2. Grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and
approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of
permits.
3. A performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee
(in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be
submitted to assure, completion of the approved site
improvements for the 3rd Addition prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4. Any outside trash disposal facilities shall be appropriately
screened from view.
5. All common parking and driving areas shall be surrounded by
B612 curb and gutter as shown on the approved drainage and
grading plans.
6. Plan approval acknowledges a master plan for all phases of the
However, each
Earle Brown Farm Estates townhouse project. H o v
additional phase is subject to preliminary plat approval and
site and building plan approval by the Planning Commission and
City Council.
6 -28 -82 -4-
7. The developers shall take adequate measures to control dust
and debris during construction. A viable turf shall be
established and maintained in those areas subject to future
development:
8. Phase 3 of the Earle Brown Farm Estates shall be included in
the single Homeowners' Association" for the entire
development.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously..
There was a motion by Councilmember Theis and seconded by. Councilmember Scott to
approve Application No. 82025 subject to the following conditions:
1 The final plat is subject to approval by the City Engineer.
2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of
the City Ordinances.
3. Homeowners' Association documents for all phases of the
development are subject to approval by the City Attorney prior
to final plat approval of each phase.
` Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis:
Voting against: none The motion passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
approve the final plat of Earle Brown Farm Estates, 3rd Addition contingent upon
receipt and approval of the Homeowners' Association documents by the City Attorney.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: none._ The motion passed unanimously.
ORDINANCES
AN :ORDINANCE VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS EXISTING ON TRACT A,
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1377
The City Manager stated the easements must be vacated in conjunction with the
development of Shingle Creek Plaza II. He explained the property owner has granted
substitute easements for relocation of existing utilities and has relocated those
utilities .at- no to the City. He added the ordinance was first read on May 24,
1982, published on June 1982, and is recommended for a second reading this
evening. The Director of Public Works reviewed the ordinance for Council members
and also reviewed the location of the easement.
Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on An Ordinance
Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements. Existing on Tract A, Registerd- =Land Survey
No. 1377 and inquired if there was anyone present. who. wished 'to speak at the - public
hearing. No one appeared to speak and he entertained a, motion to close "the hearing.
There was a'motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
close the public hearing on An Ordinance Vacating Drainage and Utility E l asements
... 6.:28 -82 -5-
Existing on Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1377. Voting in favor Mayor
Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: - none
The motion passed unanimously.
ORDINANCE NO. 82 -7
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption:
AN ORDINANCE VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ' EXISTING ON TRACT A,
REGISTERED LAND SURV NO. 1377
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by member
Bill Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Dean Nyquist, _Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and 'Rich Theis; and the
following voted against the same: = none, whereupon said ordinance was declared duly
passed and adopted.
RECESS %
The Brooklyn Center City Council recessed at 8 :20 p.m. and reconvened at 8 :40 p.m.
RESOLUTIONS (CONTINUED)
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -1 19 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption
RESOLUTION DIRECTING CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN INTERESTS IN LAND (EASEMENT FOR 51ST
AVENUE NORTH WATER MAIN INSTALLATION)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, and Rich Theis; and the following
voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed
and adopted. Couneilmember Hawes was not present during the vote.
Councilmember Hawes returned to the table at 8:41 p.m.
RESCLUTION NO. 82 -120
Member Celia Scott introduced the following' resolution and moved its adoption;
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING WATER TOWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982-15 (PAINTING OF
1.5 MILLION GALLON ELEVATED STORAGE TANK), APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (CONTRACT 1982 -G)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Rich Theis, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka,, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis: and the
following voted against the same, none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly
passed and adopted.
- In discussion of the 'next resolution a Resolution Revising Municipal State Aid`
n.. Street System Designations within the City of Brooklyn Center, the Director of
Public Works pointed out that on March 22, 1982 the City Council adopted a resolution
providing for certain revisions to the City's Municipal State Aid' system. He
explained the resolution before the Council this evening essentially accomplishes
6 -28 -82 -6-
the same result as Resolution No. 82 -48 but accomplishes it in a manner acceptable to
the MN /DOT administration. Originally, he pointed out, the City proposed a joint ,
City /County designation on 69th Avenue North, which is allowed-by statute. He
added that the MN /DOT administration does not favor designation of joint
Municipal /County /State aid streets and also that the exchange of designations, even
after the maximum mileage is exceeded because of trunk highway turnbacks, is allowed
so long as the revocation and new designation are accomplished concurrently.
Therefore, he stated the staff is recommending that the City now adopt the revised
resolution which retains the MSA designation of 62nd Avenue between Dupont Avenue
and Lyndale Avenue and of 67th Avenue between Dupont Avenue and West River Road. He
pointed out this revised resolution does not designate 69th Avenue from the west
corporate limits to Brooklyn Boulevard as a combined /County /State Aid
street. He also recommended that in the future when Hennepin County wishes to revoke
its designation of this segment of 69th, the City then act to concurrently revoke the
designations of the 62nd and 67th Avenue segments and designate this segment of 69th
Avenue
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -121
Member Bill Hawes introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption,:
RESOLUTION REVISING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET SYSTEM DESIGNATIONS WITHIN THt �;1IT
OF BROOKLYN CENTER
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member -
Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and
the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution; was declared
duly passed and adopted.
The City Manager introduced a-Resolution Authorizing Execution of Agreement for
Engineering Services for Water SupplyStudy. The Director of Public Works stated
that the study, completed by Black & Veatch in 1980, was done to quantify the water
needs in the City and to determine how to allocate the water in the City. He
explained it was not a detailed study of the supply side of the system. He stated
the Black & Veatch study made several recommendations with regard to the - water
supply including the recommendation that a detailed hydrologic study be conducted
to review and evaluate the City's long range well production potential. He pointed
out the study would evaluate the long term effort- of, regional - ground water - use.on
Brooklyn Center's supply and reliability and also established a location and
capacity of 'additional wells. In addition the'- Black:& Veatch 1980 report
recommended at least one additional well be installed by 1981, that the ultimate '
demand' will require either the installation. of five or six new wells tir the
installation of three new wells a a 2.5 million gallon ground storage reservoir,
and that a central control system be provided to operate all existing and future
wells and water tanks.
The Director of Public Works .reviewed the qualifications of- the consultants
interviewed for the study and recommended the City accept Black &, Veatch' s proposal
and enter into the proposed contract.
Councilmember Hawes inquired whether the option of using the river as a water source
had ever been investigated. The Director of Public Works replied: that the addition
of five to six wells in the City assumes no rationing of water would ever be necessary
and that with five to six wells no backup water supply source would be needed. He
added the cost of a water purification plant, which would be needed with river water
6 -28 -82 -7-
use, was estimated at $14,000,000 by Black & Veatch in their 1980 study.
The City Manager stated his concern regarding the City's water system is the fact the
discovery of a number of contamination sites throughout the State by the PCA leaves
many questions with regard to the ultimate effect on water supply sources throughout
the State. He added no one knows how these sites or other contamination sites may
' affect the City of Brooklyn Center, and that this is one of the reasons he would
recommend the, study, that being, to make the best possible recommendation for future
- water supply sources.
Council discussion continued regarding the advisability of the study and`
Couhcilmember Lhotka stated that he recalled the past discussions. of the Council
which seemed to indicate the Hinckley aquifer should be the next aquifer that is
tapped for. water. The Director of Public Works stated` that previous Council
discussions had focused on this but at that time we were unaware that the Hinckley
aquifer is being "mined," meaning the water supply is not being replenished as fast
as it is being used. He noted the Jordan aquifer, the aquifer currently used by.the
City is being replenished.
The City Manager stated the staff is recommending the study to minimize the risk of
maintaining a future water supply for the City. The Director of Public Works stated
all sources of contaminants are not known, and the PCA is in the process of
evaluating those sites throughout the State. He pointed out the PCA indicated
these sources of contamination are considerable. He added the consultant used in
this study can evaluate the known sources and how they might affect the City's water
supply, and that the consultant can also use a gas chromatograph to analyze well
water, for traces of contaminants hopefully, none of which will be found.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -122
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER
SUPPLY SYSTEM
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Bill Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Dean "Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and the
following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly
passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 82- 123
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED UNDER MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 58929 (REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC CONTROL AND
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM AT 58TH AVENUE NORTH AND T.H. 152 AND REVISION OF TRAFFIC
CONTROL.SYSTEMS AT 63RD AND 69TH AVENUES NORTH AND T.H. 152)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Bill Hawes, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Dean Nyquist, Gene Lhotka, Celia Scott, Bill Hawes, and Rich Theis; and the
following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly
passed and adopted.
6 -28 -82 -8
DISCUSSION ITEMS
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
The City Manager reported on the first discussion item, the Employee Assistance
Program contract for 1982 -1983. He explained this program has been very successful
in the City and provides confidential referrals for _employees with chemical,
financial, marital or other problems which could affect job performance. He added
the staff is recommending the program be renewed for another year. He pointed out
Administrative Assistant Bublitz has prepared a memorandum which is included in the
Council agenda and discusses the Employee Assistance Program and the cost of the
program.
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to
approve the statement of agreement between Cromer Management, Inc. and the City of
Brooklyn Center to renew the Employee Assistance Program for the period July 1, 1982
to June 30, 1983• Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist,.Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott,
Hawes, and Theis. Voting Against: none. The motion passed unanimously.- -
FREEWAY PARK SHELTER BUILDING
The City Manager stated the shelter building at Freeway Park has suffered extensive
damage due to vandal - ism. He-pointed out the vandalism appears to be ongoing and -
includes shingles being torn off the roof, siding and fascia boards torn off, doors
and door frames kicked in, interior siding torn off the walls and obscene graffiti
over the entire building. Councilmember Scott commented on the reduced organized
activity in Freeway Park and inquired whether a shelter building would be necessary
to maintain. Councilmember Hawes inquired as to the type of equipment in the park.
The Director of Parks and - Recreation explained that the park had recently been
improved with a paved parking lot,- a pathway, a hard surface volley ball court, and
new playground equipment
Councilmember Scott suggested sending the- notice regarding the condition and
problems with the building to the surrounding neighborhood and to invite them to the
August Park and Recreation Commission meeting to voice their opinion on the future
of the shelter building. Councilmember Hawes stated he supports sending the letter
to.the neighborhood and would also support placing this item on as a discussion item
on the Park and Recreation Commission agenda for August.
LICENSES
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
approve the following List of licenses:
GARBAGE AND REFUSE COLLECTION LICENSE 4 .
Crosstown Sanitation Box 12, Excelsior
-
G & H Sanitation, Inc. 12448 Pennsylvania Ave.
Galagher's Service, Inc. 1691 91st Ave. N.E.
Hilger Transfer Company 8550 Zachary Lane
Midwest Grease Buyers, Inc. P. O, 222
Minneapolis Hide & Tallow P. 0. Bois 12547
Robbinsdale Transfer Co., Inca 5232 Hanson Court
Walters' Disposal Service, Inc.. 2830 191st Ave. N.E.
Waste Control 95 West Ivy Street
6 -28 -82 -9-
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS LICENSE
Domestic Mechanical Contractors 9110 Grand Ave. S.
Lloyd's Sheet Metal 6659 Vicksburg Lane
Total Energy Heating & Cooling 5905 Lexington Ave. N.
RENTAL DWELLING LICENSE
Initial:
Gary and Sharon Hansen 6800 Perry Ave:. N.
Reina Gagainis- Wilson 6912 Toledo Ave. N
Renewal
Ron Kranaler 5432. Dupont Ave. N. .
John S. Tschohl 5416 Fremont.Ave. N.'.
Raymond & Ingeborg Fritz 5322 Irving Ave. N.
Martha Lahti 5316 Knox Ave. N.
Martha Lahti 5322 Knox, Ave. N.
John S. Tschohl_ 6912 Morgan Ave.. N.
Gary Heck 53419' 43 Penn Ave. N.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers "Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
REVIEW OF LYNDALE AVENUE AND I -94 CONSTRUCTION
The Director of Public Works explained the MN /DOT plans for Lyndale Avenue show
Lyndale will be located on the east side of Interstate 94 up to 51st Avenue Forth and
then will taper off to a ramp and service road to I -94. He explained Lyndale would
start at an exit ramp on 49th and proceed south. He stated the recommendation that
the staff is making is to rename the portion of Lyndale Avenue north of this point as •
Bass Lake Road to maintain the continuity of the street name. He pointed out this
would provide the portion of Lyndale renamed Bass Lake Road would continue from the
point around 49th Avenue all the way across Brooklyn Center and into Crystal. He
stated if the Council is in agreement with renaming this portion of Lyndale Avenue to
Bass Lake Road the staff would begin discussions with the City of Minneapolis to
review it with them. The City Council concurred with the staff's recommendation
Nand directed the staff to begin discussions with the City of Minneapolis regarding
the change in name of Lyndale Avenue
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Hawes to
adjourn the meeting. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyguist, Councilmembers Lhotka,
Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 10:00 p.m.,
Clerk Mayor
6 -28 -82 __
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
- l0 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FOR
CENTRAL PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -12 (ATHLETIC
FIELD FENCING CONSTRUCTION; CONTRACT 198 -E)
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Improvement Project
No. 1982 -12, bids were received, opened, and tabulated by the City Clerk and
City Engineer, on the 8th day of July, 1982. Said bids were as follows:
Bidder Bid Amount
Crown of Minnesota, Inc. $12,273.20
Century Fence Company $13,302.80
Crowley Fence Company, Inc. $13,769.60
Holmes Fence Company $14,740.00
Viking Fence and Construction Company $15,207.60
WHEREAS, it appears that Crown of Minnesota, Inc. of Minneapolis,
Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to
enter into the attached contract, in the amount of $12,273.20, with
Crown of Minnesota, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota, in the name of
the City
'e o. 1982-12
of Brooklyn e t r for I Project N
C n e
Y Y P J
according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
e' s except that the
l bidders e i m with their bid ex
to al b dde s th deposits is ode i ,
� P P
deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall
be retained until a contract has been signed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:
The estimated a o Improvement Project No. 1982 -12 is Y
1. Th e t mated tot 1 cost of Im ement Pro
v
�
P
amended according to the following schedule:
As Ordered As Bid
Contract $ 17,500.00 $.12,273.20
Engineering $ 1,575.00 $ 1,104.59
i
Administrative $ 175.00 $ 122.73
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 19,250 00 $ 13,500.52
R
RESOLUTION NO.
2. The estimated costs will be financed as follows:
Capital Projects Fund (Division 56) $13,500.52
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
f,
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: July 9, 1982
RE: Athletic Field Fencing
Contract 1982 -E
This contract provides for installation of outfield fencing for
the baseball field and the two softball fields in Central Park.
Fencing will be six foot high chain link, galvanized fencing.
The low bidder, Crown of Minnesota, Inc. is an established firm
with a good reputation for quality work. We recommend award of
the contract to Crown.
Financing for this project is provided by the Park Board proceeds.
Accounting is provided within the Capital Projects Fund, Division
56 (Central Park III) .
Sy Tin pp
U
SK:jn
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
! RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FORM
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -13
(DRINKING FOUNTAIN INSTALLATION; CONTRACT 1982 -F)
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for improvement Project
No. 1982 -13, bids were received, opened, and tabulated by the City Clerk and
City Engineer, on the 8th day of July, 1982. Said bids were as follows:
BIDDER BID AMOUNT
Bauer- Reamer Excavating $ 15,971.25
LeVahn Brothers, Inc. $ 25,726.50
Sullivan's Services, Inc. $ 32,890.00
0 & P Contracting, Inc. $ 33,441.00
Axel Newman Heating and Plumbing Company $ 41,797.50
Natural Green, Inca $ 46,571.50
Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. $ 51,310.00
WHEREAS, it appears that Bauer - Reamer Excavating of Hastings, Minnesota,
is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota:
1. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to
enter into the attached contract, in the amount of $15,971.25 with
Bauer- Reamer Excavating of Hastings, Minnesota, in the name of
the City of Brooklyn Center, for Improvement Project No. 1982 -13
according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposit of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall
be retained until a contract has been signed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:
1. The estimated total cost of Improvement Project No. 1982 -13 is.
hereby amended according to the following schedule:
As Ordered As Bid
Contract $,17,000.00 $ 15,971.25
Engineering $ 1,530.00 $ 1,437.43 .
Administrative $ 170.00 ' 159.71
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 18,700.00 $ 17,568.37
r
RESOLUTION NO.
i
2.. The estimated costs will be financed as follows:
Capital Projects Fund (Division 88) $17,568.37
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by•
member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
- TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: July 9, 1982
RE: Neighborhood Parks Improvement Project No. 1982 -13
(Drinking Fountain Installation)
Contract 1982 -F
On July 8, 1982, the City received bids for installation of previously
purchased drinking fountains in the following parks: Bellvue,
Brooklane, Central, East Palmer, Evergreen, Firehouse, Freeway, Garden
City, Grandview, Happy Hollow, Kylawn, Lion's, Northport, Orchard'
Lane, Riverdale, Twin Lake, West Palmer, Willow Lane.
Upon review of the bids, it was determined that the apparent low bid
was submitted by Bauer- Reamer Excavating at a total bid price of
$15,971.25. The firm was informed of the bid amounts of the other
contractors, and a brief review of the project scope ensued. The low
bidder informed the staff that the firm, formed in September of 1981,
was comprised of family members and was therefore capable of holding
overhead costs to a minimum while meeting all existing federal, state,
and local laws relating to employment. The contractor understood
all aspects of the project and felt that a responsible bid was sub-
mitted.
The staff contacted the City of Eagan (Mr. Brad Swenson) regarding
work previously completed by the contractor and was informed that the
workers were considered to be capable,and conscientious.
It is believed that the firm is capable of completing this work in
an acceptable manner. Based upon the reference provided, it is
recommended the City Council'accept the bid of Bauer - Reamer Excavating.
Since the drinking fountains are accessible to people confined to
wheelchairs, the installation cost is elligible for reimbursement
under the provisions of a Community Development Block Grant. Accord-
ingly, all accounting for the project will be completed in the Capital
Projects Fund.
Are
Sy Knap
SK :jn
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING EVERGREEN PARK SOCCER FIELD
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -16
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 82 -47, the' City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, has deemed it necessary and in the best interests
of the City to provide for improvement of the Evergreen Park /School Recreational
complex by development of soccer fields at an estimated construction cost of
$38,500.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that:
1. Said improvement is hereby established as follows:
Evergreen Park Soccer Field Improvement Project No. 1982 -16
2. Accounting for Project No. 1982 -16 will be done in Capital
Projects Fund, Division Number 88.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the.adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and.adopted.
•
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: July 9, 1982
RE: Evergreen Park Soccer Field Improvement Project No. 1982 -16
Pursuant to recent City Council directives regarding development of
the Evergreen Park /School recreational complex, the staff has developed
detailed plans and specifications for the construction of one soccer
field in conjunction with the 69th - 70th Avenue improvements. The
estimated construction cost for the soccer field development is
$38,500.00, financing for said project to be from the Capital Projects
fund, in accordance with the provisions of the 1982 budget as adopted
by the City Council.
Presently, City forces are engaged in the first phase of clean- �
of the "bone yard" adjacent to the site. The size of-the fenced yard
will be reduced by approximately 25% to accommodate the soccer field
development. Subsequent phases of clean -up will be undertaken as
scheduling permits and sufficient storage areas are developed at the
City garage site.
i
Sy Knap
I ,
SK:jn
i
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PARK SHELTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 1982 -17 (GRANDVIEW, NORTHPORT, HAPPY HOLLOW SHELTER
IMPROVEMENTS), APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND
DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (CONTRACT 1982 -I)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota,
deems it necessary to provide for the remodeling of Grandview, Northport, and
Happy Hollow Park Shelters at an estimated construction cost of $31,205.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that said improvements be provided for through the
establishment of:
f Park Shelter Improvement Project No. 1982 -17
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:
1. The plans and specifications for Contract 1982 -I for said improvements
prepared by the firm of Lindberg Pierce, Ina. Architects are hereby
approved and ordered filed with the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least twice
in the official newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an
advertisement for bids upon the'making of such improvements under
such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall
appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date for receipt
of bids, and specify the work to be done, state that said bids
will be received by the City Clerk until 11:00 A.M., local time,
August 4, 1982, at which time they will be publicly opened in
the Council Chambers at City Hall by the City Clerk and 'City Engineer,
will then be tabulated and will be considered by the City Council
at 7:00 P.M. local time, on August 9, 1982, in the Council Chambers,
and that no bids'will be gonsidered unless sealed and filed with
the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check,
bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for five percent
of the amount of such bid.
3. The accounting for Project No. 1982 -17 will be done in the General
Fund Budget, Division 69 (Parks Maintenance).
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
RESOLUTION N0.
.The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
p g g
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works
DATE: July 9, 1982
RE: Park Shelter Improvement Project No. 1982 -17
The 1982 Budget of the Parks Maintenance Division (Division No. 69)
comprehends renovation of park shelters in Grandview, Northport and
Happy Hollow Parks. Subsequent to said budget approval by the City
Council, the City has retained the services of Lindberg Pierce, Inc.,
Architects, for the completion of detailed plans and specifications
for these improvements. A brief summary of the improvements and
estimated costs follows. s
Grandview Park
Improvements include: (1) Removal of wooden sliding doors and over-
head garage door and enclosure of the openings with matching_ brick;
(2) Replacement of main access doors.
Estimated Cost: $11,865.00
Northport Park
m
I rovements include: Removal wood exterior siding .
p (1) e oval of oo e g and
replacement with textured concrete block; (2) Minor renovations
to restrooms (installation of grab bars)
Estimated cost: $14,740.00
Happy Hollow Park
Improvements include: (1) Replacement of roof; (2) Repair of
soffits.
Estimated cost: $4,600.00
It is estimated that engineering fees for plan and specifications
development and contract administration will be $3,000.00 said costs
to be financed from'the.Parks Maintenance budget..
a
Sy Knapp
SK: jn
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1982 GENERAL FUND BUDGET -
WHEREAS, the City Council appropriated $12,500.00 in the 1982 General
Fund Budget to purchase Engineering Division Capital outlay, and that included
in the appropriation were the following capital outlay items:
Flat File Cabinet $ 600.00
Calculator, Programmable $ 1,000.00
Contour Mapping $ 8,000.00
$ 9,600.00; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works and the City Manager have advised
the Council that the calculator and contour mapping will not be purchased during
1982, and they have recommended that a plan hold file be purchased instead of
the flat file cabinet authorized in the budget:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, to amend the 1982 General Fund Engineering Division
Capital Outlay Budget as follows:
1. Delete the appropriation for the flat file cabinet ($600), the
calculator ($1,000), and the contour mapping ($8,000).
2. Appropriate $1,500 for the purchase of one plan hold file; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the net savings of $8,100 in the Engineering
Division Capital Outlay Appropriation be transferred to the Unallocated Departmental
Contingency Appropriation.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said.resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
t
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Sy Knapp; Director of Public Works
�. DATE: June 24, 1982
RE: Proposal for Change in Capital Outlay Expenditure Under
1982 Budget
The 1982 Budget of the Engineering.Division comprehended purchase of
a flat file cabinet for plan storage. Subsequent to approval of the
proposed expenditure, Engineering Division personnel have approached
various vendors regarding availability and cost of flat file cabinets.
During the discussions, vendors advised our personnel of an alternate
filing system whose capacity is 3 to 4 times greater than the flat
file system and actually takes 30o to 40% less floor space. The
system, based upon the vertical filing concept, is marketed under the
name of "Plan Hold" or Plan File" depending on the manufacturer.
Quotes for supply of the vertical filing system have been solicited
and are summarized as follows:
Vendor System C ost
Copy Equipment, Inc. Plan Hold (by Plan Hold) $1,382.80 + Delivery*
Copy Equipment, Inc. Plan File (by Ulrich)_ $1,451.25 + Delivery*
Minnesota Blueprint Plan Hold (by Plan Hold) $1,420.00
• Minnesota Blueprint Plan File (by Ulrich) $1,58
Northern Blueprint, Inc. Plan Hold (by Plan Hold) $1,555.00
* Delivery estimated at $50.00
Upon review of specifications and after discussions•with the vendors
it has been determined that "Plan File" (by Ulrich) offers a superior
product, justifying the higher price.
Based upon the information provided, I request authorization to purchase
the "Plan File" at $1,451.25 (plus freight estimated at $50.00) in
lieu of the approved flat file at $600.00.
Attached herewith is a copy of the notice of possible 1982 budget
changes submitted with the Engineering Division Budget proposal for
1983. The notice comprehends the $900 over - expenditure outlined above,
but also outlines reduced capital outlay expenditures of $9,000, result-
ing in a net reduction of $8,100 in the 1982 capital outlay budget.
Enclosures
SK: jn
CITY OI' BRCO;:LYN CENTER
VOTME O' T'OSSIBLE 1902 BUDGET CHANGES
Engineering Division 41 °
1. The Engineering Division will not expend $8,000:00 for the continuation
of the contour mapping program (Object 4552 of Capital.6utlay). it
is proposed to discontinue the program until all highway improvements
and various proposed.residential and commercial developfhents have
been completed. Re-- establishment of -the program at that time will
provide "as built" conditions as opposed to the recording of
"transition conditions" which now exist.
2. The Engineering Division will not expend $1,000.00•for purchase of a
programmable calculator (Object 4551 of Capital-Outlay). Recent
purchase of the word processing equipment•and availability of
technical design aids through LOGIS will provide the desired results
offered by the calculator.
Summary of Savings - Capital Outlay - 4551. $1
Capital Outlay - 4552 $8,000:00
SUBTOTAL 7-SAVINGS $9
3. The Engineering Division budget allows for purchase of one flat file
at an estimated cost of $600.00 (Object 4551 of Capital Outlay).
It is proposed to substitute a.plan hold file, with a capacity equal
to 3 flat file cabinets, at a -cost of.$1,500.00.
Summary - Plan hold file cost $1,500.00
Flat file savings 600.00
Subtotal Additional cost ( 900.00)
TOTAL SAVINGS $8,100.00 ,
.y
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
A7 J
RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR UPGRADING MUNICIPAL
J
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, on December 7, 1981 the City Council authorized the
development of specifications to replace and upgrade the City's radio
communications system; and
WHEREAS, on December 21, 1981, the City Council, by Resolution
81 -261, authorized the transfer of $225,000 from the General Fund Balance
to the Capital Projects Fund for the replacement and upgrading of the City's
radio communications system and remodeling of the Police Department dispatch
area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center as follows:
1. Specifications for replacing and upgrading the City's
radio communications system prepared by W. M. Montgomery
and Associates and titled "Invitation to Bid Communication
Equipment" are hereby approved and.ordered' filed with the
City Clerk.
•
I,
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at
least once in the official newspaper an advertisement for
bids upon the Invitation to Bid Communication Equipment
under such approved plans and specifications. The adver-
tisement shall appear not less than 7 days prior to the
date for receiving bids, and specify the work to be done,
state that said bids will be received by the City Clerk
until 11 :00 a.m. on August 24, 1982, at which time they
will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers at City
Hall by the City Clerk, will then be .tabulated and will
be considered by the City Council at 7 :00 p.m. on September
13, 1982 in the Council'Chambers, and that no bids will be
considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and
accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond,
or certified check payable to the City for 5% of the amount
of such bid.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
I
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed adopted.
W. M. Montgomery
} &Associates
3618 Rainbow Drive • Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 . Telephone (612) 473 -6985
July 8, 1982
Chief James Lindsay
Brooklyn Center Police Department
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Dear, Chief Lindsay:,
Delivered in hand are 14 copies of Radio Specifications and In-
vitation to Bid for the Brooklyn Center radio improvement pro -
ject. These copies are for internal use plus distribution to
potential bidders. I am not retaining a stock of these books. .
The specifications include replacement of fixed station equip -
ment for police, fire and public works radio systems plus console
and other equipment to accommodate Brooklyn Park police and fire
radio communications.
The Invitation to Bid is divided into two parts. Proposal "A"
is for all fixed station equipment plus dispatch console, in-
stalled. Proposal "B" is for the logging tape recorder. Not
included in the Invitation are standard mobile and portable
radios nor digital voice privacy (DVP) radios for police.
The radio bid, Proposal "A ", is divided into 32 line items,
each of which will be separately priced by the bidder. These
.32 items include some equipment which would be purchased only
if Brooklyn Park joined Brooklyn Center in a joint dispatch
program. of course, if Brooklyn Park does not join Brooklyn
Center,.the Brooklyn Park items would be deleted from the
contract award. f
I•estimate cost of the procurement as follows:
Proposal "A" radio equipment, not including third
dispatch console or its installation, not including
the satellite receivers and their installation at
the Brooklyn Park water tower, 78th and Boone, and
not including dial interconnect for radio paging bY$116,350
Brooklyn Center.public works.
Brooklyn Center public works dial interconnect 3500
for radio paging, installed.
Third dispatch console plus Brooklyn Park satellite 37,350
receivers, installed
Communications Systems - Planning & Engineering
Chief James Lindsay -2- July 8, 1982
Proposal "B ", 20 channel logging tape recorder
plus accessories. $19,000
Negotiated price for (15) standard police
mobile radios, installed @ $1600 24,000
Negotiated price for (15) standard police
portable radios with battery chargers and
accessories @ $1500 22,500
DVP station plus (1) DVP mobile radio and
(2) DVP portable radios, installed 21,725
Grand Total to Brooklyn Center $207,975
Grand Total to Brooklyn Park $ 37,350
It must be clearly understoodthat the division of cost shown
above between Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park relates onl
r fie atch
I � to .items required because Brooklyn Park police and r p
is joined to the Brooklyn Center operation. It does not con -
sider cost of any equipment which would be used, more intensively
because of Brooklyn Park but would nevertheless be purchased by
Brooklyn Venter if Brooklyn Park did not join in a combined
operation. Also, cost assigned to Brooklyn, Park does not
include any equipment which might be desireable at Brooklyn
Park to complement the radio system or any modifications to
existing Brooklyn Park radios flowing from differences in the
county and Brooklyn Center radio systems. "
The above prices for fixed equipment are based upon costs shown
in recent projects for similar products and should be considered r:
as estimates only. Bid prices may vary 10% or more from these
estimates. Prices for standard mobile and portable radios are'
derived from a recent State of Minnesota bid for similar radios.
The Invitation to Bid delivered to you now does not include
specifications for mobile or portable radios. This is a'de
liberate omission because, as we have discussed', I believe you
can achieve a more favorable price by direct purchase of these R
radios than by including them in the instant bid package. I
believe this for two reasons:
Chief James Lindsay -3- July 8, 1982 -
1. A vendor can be expected to spread anticipated system
optimization cost across all items on the bid. This
hidden surcharge will relate to the bidder's estimate of
optimization cost, system complexity, and dollar value of
the project. By keeping total bid cost as low as possible,
the hidden surcharge for system responsibility will be mini -
mized.
2 The State of Minnesota recently purchased mobile and por-
table radios on a hardware bid which are similar to mobile
and portable radios required for this project. That is,
the State purchased these radios without further respon-
sibility assigned to the vendor other than to warrant the
radios would work as specified. In the Brooklyn Center
procurement the vendor will have to install the equipment
on the bid list and then show the system operates as speci-
fied a much more stringent test. Prices bid on the
recent State procurement are lower than anything I have seen .
on recent system bids for similar equipment. Although
purchase of mobile and portable radios will remove them
from the test of system responsibility, the vendor is not
being asked to guarantee radio coverage anyway and the
warranty for proper operation of each mobile and portable
radio would not be affected. Moth Motorola and GE have
informally indicated ,a willingness to me to extend their
Minnesota bid prices to you. Motorola was the low bidder
on mobile radios and GE the low bidder for portable radios.
Radios with DVP scrambling are available only from Motorola.
Only Motorola has sought FCC approval for a radio to be sold
to the civilian market using digitally encrypted voice modu-
lation. Only Motorola is approved by the FCC to manufacture
such a radio for the civilian market and only Motorola sells
such a radio to the civilian market. Digital scrambling is
extremely secure and has become the industry standard in the I
two years it has been on the market. DVP radios are used by
all the federal law enforcement agencies in the Twin Cities,
Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, and several muni-
cipal police departments in the Cities. Since these radios
are available only from Motorola, I feel you would -be better
served to negotiate a price for them than enter"into
a bidding process in which you know only,one response will be
received on a take- it -or- leave -it basis.
Y
Chief James Lindsay -4- July 8 1982
I will chair the bidders conference tenetively scheduled for
l0am, Tuesday, August 3, 1982. At that time potential bidders
will have an opportunity to ask questions concerning the pro-
ject and object to bid requirements. I understand it is your
intention to schedule the bid opening for llam, Tuesday,
August 24, 1982. The schedule in the front of the bid book
reflects these dates and times.
Potential bidders who should receive a copy of the Invitation
are:
General Electric Company
- James Amos
7360 Bush Lake Road
Edina, Minnesota 55435
General Communications
Ralph Mullins
7450 Oxford Street
St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55426
Communications Center
Paul Botnen
7601 South Lyndale Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423
Capitol Electronics
Ray Lundgren
836 North Prior
St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
Motorola C & E, Inc.
Kenneth Hoeg
11100-West Bren Road
Minnetonka,-Minnesota 55343
AirCom
David Lethert
76 East Moreland
West St. Paul, Minnesota 55118
Very. truly yours,
r y"-7.W.M. Montgome
Member introduced the following resolution'
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. D Vo V
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REMODELING
POLICE DEPARTMENT DISPATCH AREA
WHEREAS, on December 21, 1981 the City Council, by Resolution
81 -261, authorized the transfer of $225,000 from the General Fund Balance
to the Capital Projects Fund for the replacement and upgrading of the City's
radio communications system and remodeling of the Police Department dispatch
area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
Brooklyn Center as follows:
1. Plans and specifications for the remodeling of the Police
Department dispatch area prepared by the Architectural
firm of Lindberg Pierce, Inc., dated and submitted to the
City of Brooklyn Center July 7, 1982, are hereby approved
and ordered filed with the City Clerk.
2. The City shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least
once in the official newspaper ari advertisement for bids
upon the remodeling of the Police Department dispatch area
under such approved plans and specifications. 'The adver-
tisement shall appear not less than 7 days prior to the
date fox receiving bids, and shall specify the work to be
done, state that said bids will be received by the City
Clerk until 11:30 a.m. on August 24, 1982, at which time
they will be publicly opened the Council Chambers at
City Hall by the City Clerk, will then be tabulated and
will be considered by the City Council at 7 :00 p.m. on
September 13, 1982 in the Council Chambers, and that no
bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the
City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's
check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City
for 5% of the amount of such bid.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
4 and the following voted against the same;
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed.and adopted.
z .
r MEMORANDUM
U
TO: Gerald Splinter, City Manager
FROM: James Lindsay, Chief of Police
DATE July 9, 1982
SUBJECT: Proposed Remodeling of Communications Room and
Radio Specifications for Upgrading of Equipment
Attached please find the specifications for the Brooklyn Center
radio improvement project prepared by W. M. Montgomery and
Associates. Also included are the blueprint design and
estimated construction costs for the communications room which
were prepared by Lindberg Pierce, Incorporated.
You will note that the costs for the radio and 'auxiliary
equipment is estimated at $207,975.00. The original estimate
given b Montgomery, a roximatel one year a was
g Y approximately ago, g,
$210,000.00. The estimate from Lindberg Pierce, Incorporated
is $17,600.00.. This is approximately $3,000.00 higher than
the $14,850.00 which was estimated in October, 1981 by
Lindberg Pierce, Incorporated. The two new estimates give us
P g
a.grand total of $225,575.00. Approximately a year ago, the
City Council encumbered $225,000.00 for this radio upgrading
project.
I
Lindberg Pierce, Inc.. Architects
Suite 512
512 Nicollet Mail
.- .
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 James H. Lindberg
(612) 332 -3339 Robert L. Pi
July 7, 1982
Mr. Jim Lindsay
Chief of Police
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Re: Probable Remodeling Costs
Radio Dispatch Area
Brooklyn Center City Hall
Dear Mr. Lindsay:
We have reviewed the construction costs for the remodeling of the dispatch
area in accordance with the plans submitted to you and dated July 7, 1982.
Our estimate is that the construction cost will not exceed $16,000 with
Architectural /Engineering compensation an additional $1,600 for a total
cost of $17,600.
Sincere ,
Robert Pierce
kap
cc. Gerald Splinter
Public Elevator Cell Cell Cell
Secretary Storage
Enlarged �--- -�
Ra io Dispatch Book ng Interrogation
_... Storage Toilet
�:Y........ .. .... ............................... .............:1....
BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE DEPARTMENT REMODELING
Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Architects 7/7/1982
. y
cnnpoE FRGnTc1nS
TO n SRST C Rim
KLYN CENTER
CRIME
PREVENTMN
ND
561 -6649 561 -6614
Qot N-
.6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, MN. 55430
Crimes such as Burglary, Assault, Larceny, Auto Theft, Fraud and
Vandalism are common occurrences in Brooklyn Center. YOU can do
something about it! The most effective crime prevention tools in
a community are its citizens.
Several civic groups and organizations in Brooklyn Center have
decided to start a crime prevention program. The participating
groups have developed a program called the "CRIME PREVENTION FUND ".
The fund is now operating in the city! HOW DOES IT WORK? HOW CAN
YOU BE A PART OF IT? Read on!
HOW DOES THE "CRIME PREVENTION FUND" WORK?
The "Crime Prevention Fund" is a citizens sponsored fund.' Its
direct purpose is to obtain information on unsolved crimes. This
information is gathered anonymously from citizens who want to do
something about crime in Brooklyn Center. The telephone number,
561 -6649 may be.used day or night to report information that will
assist the police in solving crimes The telephone number is NOT
an emergency number and should never be used to report a crime in
progress or in an emergency! Calls to the "Crime Prevention Fund
phone number are recorded and regularly reported to the Brooklyn
Center Police. The police then follow.up on the information in.
a normal investigative manner.
FINANCIAL REWARDS may be offered to citizens when information leads
to arrest and formal charging. The reporting citizen remains
anonymous! Only the police have the recorded messages. If you
have information that might help solve a crime, call the "Crime
Prevention Fund" number.. If you see a crime or suspicious activity
in progress, call the regular police emergency number, 561 -5720.
"CRIME PREVENTION FUND
' 561 -66!9
y 4
WHAT KIND OF TIPS ARE USEFUL TO THE POLICE?
The best.tips are those which are factual and can be substantiated,
such as:
a. Names and addresses of suspects
b. Dates and times of crime(
c. Positive identification of suspect(s)
d.' License numbers of vehicles involved
e. Identifiable characteristics of suspect(s)
f. Personal knowledge of the crime(s) involved
1
HOtd DO I REMAIN ANONYMOUS?
An individual who wants to provide confidential information to the
"Crime Prevention Fund" can maintain complete anonymity simply by
not revealing any information on his or her.identity. If more
contacts with the Fund are necessary, the individual need only call
or write again, or- other contact arrangements can be made in any
manner desired. All information given is immediately. forwarded to
the Brooklyn Center Police Department.
WHY IS ANONYMITY IMPORTANT? '
I a. Some citizens may be afraid to assist in the solving of
a crime because they fear reprisal.
b. Many people have a general fear of "getting involved ".
c. Some people are concerned about the potential publicity
or need to testify at a trial.
"d. Some of the people best able to provide information about
crimes are those people who are directly or indirectly
involved with the crime. Without the assurance of
anonymity, this source of information is not available
because of the person's fear of reprisal.
i
k:'.ERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM?
T he Bro oklyn
1
come
from roo
.:�e support money for the Crime Prevention Fund" Y
Center citizens and business people who feel strongly that doing
so:jething about crime is everybody's responsibility. No tax dollars
are involved, and all donations are tax deductible. We hope you'll
• mnsider donating to this worthy cause.
H ^W IS "CRIME PREVENTION FUND" MONEY USED?
:'`.e m- ney is used for a variety of purposes, some of which are:
2. Paying rewards for information.
2 • Paying informants.
3• Paying for operating expenses (phone,
printing, etc.) -
4• Further publicity about the "Crime Prevention Fund ".
YOU .AND ALL OTHER ,RLSIPENTS .QF
WHO BENEFITS FROM THIS PROGRAM? -
BROOKLYN CENTER!
THE SUCCESS OF THIS PROGRAM DEPENDS ON YOUR INFORMATION, YOUR SUPPORT.
cut here
YES! I WANT TO HELP, ENCLOSED IS MY CONTRIBUTION TO ASSIST YOU.
O $5,00 O $10,00 {) $15,00 (} $20,00 O
( )
I'D LIKE TO HELP YOU IN SOME WAY, PLEASE CALL ON ME-WHEN YOU
NEED ASSISTANCE
- NAME
-Bend Check or Money Order to: ADDRESS
I LB.C. Crime Prevention Fund SIP
5301 Shingle Creek Parkway
,.Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 PHONE
cut here
Current Sponsoring Organizations
Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce
Brooklyn Center Rotary Club
Brooklyn Center JC`s
Brooklyn Center Lions Club
Community Emergency Assistance Program (CEAP)'
Brooklyn Center Volunteer.Firemen
Brooklyn Center JC Women
Northwest Kiwanis Club
Brooklyn Center Lioness Club
Brooklyn Center Historical Society
Brooklyn Center Women's Club
Brooklyn Twins
Leisure Time
CRIME PREVENTION FUND"
561 -6649
CRIME PREVENTION FUND MI3MBERS-
AS OF JUNE 15, 1982
"EMBERS & AMOUNTS PLEDGED /PAID MARCH 29 - MAY 25:
Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce $ 300.00
Brooklyn Center Rotary 300.00
Brooklyn Center.Womens Club 200.00
Brooklyn Historical Society 100.00
Subtotal $ 900.00
MEMBERS & AMOUNTS PLEDGED /PAID ON MAY 28:
Brooklyn Center Lions Club 300.00
Brooklyn Center Fire Association 300.00 _-
Brooklyn Center Police Association 300.00
Subtotal 900.00
MEMBERS & AMOUNTS /PAID JUNE 9:
Brooklyn Center Jaycee Women 50.00
North Hennepin Kiwanis 75.00
Dr. Orn, CEAP 100.00
Brooklyn Center Jaycees 75.00
Brooklyn Center Lioness Club 50.00
Subtotal 350.00
MEMBERS & AMOUNTS PLEDGED /PAID JUNE 16:
Brooklyn Twills - 25.00
n C Leisure 25
Brooklyn enter Le sure Time
Subtotal 50.0
GRAND TOTAL AS OF JUNE 16, 1982; $2,200.00
CRIME PREVENTION FUND
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
PRESIDENT: °
Phil Cohen
Member -at -Large
5302 Humboldt Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
560 -9265
VICE- PRESIDENT:
Bill Fignar
Brooklyn Center_ Rotary
6025 Abbott Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
561 -2818 - Home
788 -4288 - Office
SECRETARY:
Bobbye'Moylan
Brooklyn Center Lioness Club
5541 Knox Avenue North -
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
560 -8756
TREASURER:
Jay Hruska
Brooklyn-Center Fire Association
5012 North Lilac Drive
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
535 -4637 - Home
854 -5056 - Office
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER:
Chief James Lindsay
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
561 -5443
CRIME PREVENTION FUND
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Dale Buchholz Phil Cohen., President
Brooklyn Center Jaycees Member-at-Large
7212 Emerson Avenue North 5302 Humboldt Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Brooklyn Center, 'MN 55430
560 -1396 560 -9265
Paul DesVernine Bill Fignar, Vice - President
Brooklyn Center Chamber Brooklyn Center Rotary
C/o Iten Leasing Company 6025 Abbott Avenue North
6701 Brooklyn Boulevard Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
Brooklyn Center, MN °55429 561 -2818 - Home
561 -9220 788-42887 Office
Dennis J. Flaherty Mary Jane Gustafson
Brooklyn Center Police Ass'n Brooklyn Center A`ss'n
6301-Shingle Creek Parkway 4935 Abbott Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Minneapolis, MN 55429
561 -5440 537 -8484
Jay Hruska, Treasurer Sylvia Kenney
Brooklyn Center Fire Ass'n- Brooklyn Twins and Brooklyn
5012 North Lilac Drive Center Leisure Time
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 6900 France Avenue North
535 -4637 - Home Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
854 -5056 Office 561 -4805
Bobbye Moylan, Secretary Brenda Olson
Brooklyn Center Lioness Club. Brooklyn Center Womens Club
5541 Knox Avenue North 6424 Kyle Avenue North
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430. Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
560 -8756 537 -0995
Dr. Duane Orn - Richard Risley
CEAP Brooklyn Center Lions
5415 Brooklyn Boulevard 3624 Admiral Lane
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Brooklyn Center, MN 55
533 -8666 533 -6280 - Home
348 -3568 Office
Lyle Robinson Nikki Sevig
North Hennepin Kiwanis Brooklyn Center Jaycee Women
8056 Zenia Avenue North 5646 Girard Avenue North
. Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
560 -7066
Jack Weber
Member -at -Large
6040 Earle Brown .Drive
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
560 -6810
THE
BROOKLYN CENITER
CRIME PREVENTION FUND
BROOKLYN CENTER
CRIME
PREVENTION
- FUND
z
T AE BROOKLYN CENTER GRIME PR �'E ENRON FUND
THE PURPOSES OF THE FUND;
TO PROVIDE THE BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE DEPARTMENT WITH A
SOURCE OF FUNDS THAT WILL ASSIST THEM IN SOLVING CRIMES
AND TO FURTHER REDUCE CRIME IN BROOKLYN CENTER
CAN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER USE TAXPAYERS DOLLARS FOR THIS
F UND?
THE ANSWER IS A SIMPLE NO! !' MINNESOTA STATE LAW PROHIBITS
MUNICIPALITIES FROM USING TAX FUNDS FOR REWARDS
WHAT OTHER COMMUNITIES NOW HAVE SUCH LEND?
EDINA WAS THE FIRST COMMUNITY IN THIS AREA TO SET UP THIS
TYPE OF FUND ST , LOUIS PARK & BROOKLYN P ARK HAVE ALSO
ESTABLISHED FUNDS
WHAT WOULD THE FUND BE USED FOR?
THE BROOKLYN CENTER CRIME PREVENTION FUND WOULD BE INITIALLY
USED FOR
1. MONEY TO BUY INFORMATION OR CONTRABAND (DRUGS,
STOLEN GOODS, ETC.)
2. REWARD MONEY
HOW IS THIS LOCAL TYPE OF FUND DIFFERENT FROM THE "CRIME STOPPERS -
FU2"?
"CRIME STOPPERS" DEALS MAINLY WITH CRIMES ON AN AREA WIDE
BAS IS. THEY CONCENTRATE ON ORGANIZED CR THAT GO AFTER
SHOPPING CENTERS, BANK ROBBERIES, DRUG STORE ANDHABITUAL
HITS FOR NARCOTICS, ETC. (CRIME STOPPERS HAS ASSISTED
BROOKLYN CENTER IN ONLY ONE HOMICIDE TO DATE.)
U OE:S A CRIME PREVENTION FUND AY DIVIDEND
THE OVERALL EXPERIENCE INDICATES A GOOD SUCCESS RECORD.
AN EXAMPLE FROM ST, LOUIS PARK IS OFFERED, AS FOLLOWS:
PROPERTY RECOVERED AND /OR PROPERTY DAMAGE RESTITUTIO,d
LADE
-- $340,000 - TOTAL AMOUNT OF PROPERTY RECOVERED, ETCH
-- $174000 - REWARD MONEY PAID OUT
- 95 -5 - RATIO OF RECOVERY TO REWARD.
PART I CRIME RECORD — 5 YEAR EXPERIONCE# '
TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES 225
TOTAL NUMBER OF ARRESTS MADE,' 190
THIS IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE CRIME PREVENTION FUND AND
REWARDS OFFERED
* PART I CRIMES ARE ASSAULT, FELONY, BOMBING, BURGLARY,
AGGRAVATED ROBBERY, CRIMINAL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY, ETC.
I
f:
h_0W IS THE FU dD , {�� I STr�ATEi�
A. A BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE COMPRISED OF A MEMBER
FROM EACH CIVIC GROUP INVOLVED AND /OR PRIVATE
CITIZENS, AS WILL BE SET FORTH IN THE EVENTUAL
BYLAWS.
B. AN EXECUTIVE BOARD OF 3 ) TO 5 PERSONS WILL ACTUALLY
BE INVOLVED WITH DISPENSING MONEY FROM THE FUND,
THIS EXECUTIVE BOARD WILL BE APPOINTED BY THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
C. THE POLICE CHIEF WILL BE THE ''EXECUTIVE OFFICER"
OF THE FUND AND WILL BE AUTHORIZED TO SPEND A
CERTAIN AMOUNT I.E. UP TO $50) WITHOUT HAVING TO
SEEK FURTHER APPROVAL OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
D. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SETS UP THE GUIDELINES FOR
USE OF' THE FUND,
E. THE POLICE CHIEF ADMINISTRATES THE FUND ACCORDING
TO THOSE GUIDELINES.
F. THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE WILL NOT BE IDENTIFIED
PUBL -ILLY.
v
. 6
HOW IS A FUND STARTED. ,
ANY ORGANIZATION IN A COMMUNITY OR INTERESTED CITIZENS
COULD START_A CRIME PREVENTION FUND
HOW MUCH MONEY-IS NEEDED FOR A "START UP FU D
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ABOUT $2,000 BE AVAILABLE FOR A
"START UP FUND ", START UP COSTS ARE ESTIMATED AT f -,
300 PHONE RECORDER
70 SEPARATE PHONE LINE
240 FIRST YEAR CHARGE I FOR PHONE LINE
00 INSTALLATION CHARGES
1300 BUY/REWARD MONEY L PROMOTION COSTS
9
WHAT SHOULD.BE TH SIZE OF THE FUUD
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A MINIMUM FUND OF $25,000 BE
THE GOAL.
WHAT ARE THE SIZES OF ANQUATS PAID OUT?
1. INFORMATION COULD RANGE FROM $5..00 TO $100.00.
2. DRUG & STOLEN GOODS FROM $75.00 TO $10,000.00.
($10,000.00 WOULD MAINLY BE FOR I/ FLASH.MONEY ")
N OW ARE THE FUNDS SECURED FOR THIS PROORO?
BASED ON METHODS USED SUCCESSFULLY IN OTHER COMMUNITIES,
THE FOLLOWING SOURCES ARE SUGGESTED:
1. COMMUNITY CIVIC GROUPS.:
2. BUSINESS COMMUNITY.
• 3. 'CITIZENS OF THE COMMUNITY.
CONTRIBUTIONS ARE TAX DEDUCTIBLE.
AFTER START UP, CITIZEN CONTRIBUTIONS AMOUNT TO
APPROXIMATELY 90 -95% OF THE FUNDING. CIVIC GROUPS
MAKE UP THE REST.
EDINA EXPERIENCE: .
90 -95% COLLECTED FROM CITIZENS
5 - 10% COLLECTED FROM CIVIC GROUPS
ANNUAL COLLECTION IN EXCESS OF $10,000.00.
C7`1 71 le Avielzilon
EDINA CRIME PREVENTION AND CRIMINAL APPREHENSION FUND, INC.
i BOX 35231 • 5108 WEST 74th STREET s ' MINNESOTA 55435
SPONSORING
1980 ANNUAL NEWSLETTER
ORGANIZATIONS
Athena Club of Edina Dear Edina Resident:
Edina American "Back to Basics" is theme which has application throughout many facets
Legion Post #471 of our society. Itrs a saying which is applicable in areas ranging from
sports participation through culinary endeavors.
'r Edina Federated "Back to Basics" also has a measure of applicability when speaking of
Women's Club crime. I'm not facetiously recommending simpler criminal acts or
crimes of less magnitude, but I am recommending some steps which can f
Edina Jaycees — impact crime in a general area. '
Edina League of Policing in a community has not changed a great deal over the years.
Women Voters Certain new technologies, areas of emphasis, and a multitude of programs
have had some impact. However, to thesd - influences, a subtle change may
Edina Lions Club have occurred. This change may' have created the feeling that crime was
a police problem and could be compartmentalized in that manner.
Edina Masonic Lodge
However, of the programs which have the greatest impact on crime, the
Edina Optimist Club most successful are those with the greatest community support and
Involvement. Crime Prevention Programs, where citizens take steps to
-Edina Reveille reduce their vulnerability to crime, ate successful. Edina's Operation
Exchange Club Identification Program, a personalized - marking - system to deter possession
and transfer of stolen property, is successful. Also, the Edina Crime
E'otary Club Prevention and Criminal Apprehension Fund, a community program for
t r
offering rewards and assisting in investigations, is successful.
Edina Woman's Club Crime is not exclusively a police problem. If, over the years, it has
appeared to have become exclusive in its description, we have gotten
Greater Edina away from the "basics." Edina, with its viable and successful approach
Chamber of Commerce to the problem of crime, has not strayed from fundamentals. Edina
l4lorningside Women's Clot.
should have continuing success in this endeavor.
- _
Taking "Back to Basics" one step futther, we should add additional
Southdale Optimist Club effectiveness: Individually, we should lock our homes and cars to prevent
thefts . Keep a watch on:our,neighborhoods, reporting suspicious
persons and activities Develop a security awareness and keep
the Edina Police phone number (925 -2233) easily available.
Crime, and its prevention, is not a simple problem in Edina. To impact
its effect in Edina, all the resources of our community must be brought
to bear. Edina has these resources and they are working. Building on
Department and communit a
. solid fundamentals, the Edina Police D ep r d the Y are
impacting crime.
The Edina Crime Prevention and Criminsl Apprehension Fund is a major
S V� o 1" effort to help f ight crime is Edina. It's an additional tool for your
;� /.• ( y police department to use in dealing with, and anticipating, crime in
' our city. Crime -- and preferably its prevention -- is a shared
responsibility of the police and the community. .,This partnership in
0
A .- � <, Edina is and will continue to be successful.
� l�
Cordially,
Craig g Swanson
Chic of Police, City of Edina
L
WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE PROPOSED F 1-,.D TO DATE?
IN THE FALL OF 1981, THE BROOKLYN CENTER ROTARY CLUB
AND THE BROOKLYN CENTER CHAMBER OF'COMMERCE FORMED A
JOINT COMMITTEE THAT WORKED WITH THE BROOKLYN CENTER
POLICE CHIEF TO INVESTIGATE THE NEED FOR THE FUND,
THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, ETC.
BOTH ORGANIZATIONS FELT THAT THERE WAS THE NEED FOR P .....
THE FUND] BUT THAT TO MAKE IT WORK AS IN OTHER
COMMUNITIES, THIS MUST BE A COOPERATIVE EFFORT ON THE
PART OF THE CIVIC GROUPS, BUSINESS COMMUNITY AND THE
RESIDENTS OF THE CITY
TO BRING THE IDEA TO THE COMMUNITY, THE FOLLOWING
HAS BEEN DONE:
1. THE CHAMBER AND THE ROTARY. HAVE BUDGETED
$300.00 EACH TOWARDS THE FUND
Z, THE JOINT COMMITTEE HAS DRAFTED SUGGESTED
BYLAWS AND ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION ALONG
WITH OTHER PAPERS NECESSARY FOR REVIEW
}
4
WHAT IS ASKED FROM THE CIVIC GROUPS:
BASED UPON EACH ORGANIZATION`S FINANCIAL CAPACITY OR
BUDGET COMMITMENTS AT THIS POINT IN TIME, GROUPS WILL.
HAVE TO ASSESS THEIR OWN COMMITMENT. WE ARE SUGGESTING
THAT THOSE THAT CAN DO SO MAKE SUCH COMMITMENTS.,.
1 $300.00, OR ANY AMOUNT THEY FEEL POSSIBLE AT
THIS TIME, TO THE START UP FUND. (IT IS
FURTHER SUGGESTED THERE IS AN ANNUAL FINANCIAL
CONTRIBUTION TO THE CRIME PREVENTION FUND.)
2. EACH CONTRIBUTING ORGANIZATION MIGHT WANT TO
i APPOINT A PERSON TO REPRESENT THEM ON THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
CRIME PREVENTION FUND
• - N PROPOSED CHRONOLOGY A D TIMETABLE:
T M
FALL 1961 BROOKLYN CENTER CHAMBER ROTARY AGREE TO TAKE THE
FUND ON AS A PROJECT AND AGREE TO PROVIDE SOME
INITIAL START UP FUNDS
14ARCH 1962 MEETING WITH JOINT COMMITTEE OF THE TWO ORGANIZATIONS
TO ORGANIZE THE PROCESS TO INVOLVE OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
IN THE START UP OF THE FUND
SET UP AND CALL A MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENTS AND/OR
COMMITTEE MEMBERS OF OTHER CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS IN
BROOKLYN CENTER
MEETING HELD TO OUTLINE THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL
CIVIC GROUP SUPPORT
APRIL 1982 OTHER GROUPS HOLD THEIR MEETINGS TO ACT ON THE
PROPOSAL,
APPLICATION MADE TO IRS FOR TAX EXEMPT STATUS.
MAY 1982 HOLD ANOTHER MEETING OF THE CIVIC GROUPS AND
DETERMINE THE LEVEL OF SUPPORT..
ESTABLISH THE CRIME PREVENTION FUND,
A. ADOPT BYLAWS
B. APPOINT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
.JUNE 1962 SEND LETTERS OF SOLICITATIONS FOR CONTRIBUTIONS. TO
THE FUND TO THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY AND RESIDENTS
A. BUSINESS- COMMUNITY - CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
• B. RESIDENTS MANAGERS NEWSLETTER
(.THIS ASSUMES WE HAVE THE EXEMPT STATUS AND CAN
STATE THAT THE CONTRIBUTIONS ARE TAX DEDUCTIBLE.)
U
AF F1 r"I
L �__
The problem is crime'.
As we are all aware, Brooklyn Park is seeing Reasons for this increasing rate of crime
ever increasing rates of crime of all kinds in include our very young population. National
our city. As was recently reported, our city statistics show that the average age of the
leads other Hennepin County suburbs in the daytime criminal is 15'/2! Also our population is
crimes of rape (25 in 1980); aggravated increasing,- so crime will increase as well. :
assault (85 in 1980) and burglary (768 in Whatever the reason, �e have a problem.
1980). There also were over 1000 reported
. cases of vandalism in 1980. And it's growing!
It * also true that our police department has We could put a police officer on every corner
a�g the highest crime clearance (crime of the city, but national statistics also show
solving) rate in Hennepin County as well that does little if anything to actually stop or
reduce crimes.
OU" C an DO _ __ _ Park Community Organization, Inc., an
association of clubs and organizations in the
zomethi now city, to tell them the story, and to recommend
that we in Brooklyn Park start a community
i ■
About - / crimin a l r hension
crime. revention a
P pp
program, similar to those in other communities.
The key to a community solving its crime The Community Organization members
problems is the citizens: agreed, and adopted the program as
recommended by the Chamber, calling it
In February of 1981, the Brooklyn Park Tele- Crime.
Chamber of Commerce surveyed the residents This special Letter is to '!et you know that
and businesses of Brooklyn Park to find out if Tele -Crime is now operating, how it works, .
people -were concerned about crime in our
city. and how you can play an important part in the
community crime efforts in Brooklyn Park.
The results of that survey, which have been
reported in local media, showed that without - Please take a few minutes to read he
question, Brooklyn Park people are Concerned information here, then keep the special phone
t crime in our area. The Chamber took number handy.
th se survey results, and went to other cities Tele -Crime now belongs to you, the
in the area to see how they have dealt with residents of Brooklyn Park, and businesses. It
their community crime problems. Then, the is new, it is important, and it will work, with
Chamber took this information to the Brooklyn your help!
Udha2
TegenCr
A a citizen's organization. Its direct purpose Crime is a serious problem in Brooklyn Park,
obtain information on unsolved. crimes. and it is increasing every year.
A big part of the reason for the increase in
This information is gathered anonymously from crime is our growing population -- we simply have
citizens who want to do something about more people living in our community. Also, our
crime in Brooklyn Park. The telephone number, population is very young. This fact alone
424 -4444, may be used day or night to report contributes greatly to increases in rates of
"leads" that will assist the police in solving crime.
crime. The Tele- Crime number is NOT an We do have an efficient police force
emergency number and should NEVER be in Brooklyn Park, evidenced by the fact
used to report a crime in progress or in an
emergency. that a high percentage of crimes are
actually solved.
But the police cannot solve this
(D !
w G I problem alone: Citizens - -you
a and I — must become part of
rNA
the solution.
Tele -Crime offers us �" J
that opportunity, as citizens, to
e help solve our communi-
t 's crime problems
Calls to the Tele -Crime number are , recorded y p
and regularly reported to The Brooklyn Park That combination is
Police. The police then follow -up on the the key. Citizens and the
information in a normal, investigative manner. police working together.
Fi ancial rewards are offered to citizens when Neither alone can do it all, i
i mation leads to arrest and formal but together we can. LA
c arging. The reporting citizen remains I encourage you to become an active
anonymous. Only the police actually have the participant in Tele- Crime, our new citizen crime
recorded messages! prevention /crime awareness program.
It does not belong to the city or the police,
(a r t. a-0; k the program belongs to you the citizens.
You can become involved in a number of
ways with Tele- Crime:
Wt U M 0 n (3 1. Report information you know about crime to the
OP Ask special Tele -Crime phone number, 424 - 4444.
You can remain anonymous and may receive a
® reward.
From a large group of Brooklyn Park citizens 2. Contribute to Tele - Crime. Every $1 or $5 or
and business people who feel strongly that more will help provide rewards, as well as
doing something about crime is everybody's better citizen communication on crime in our
responsibility. No tax dollars are involved. (All city. For your contribution, Tele -Crime will give
donations are tax deductible.) you a sticker for your home or office, saying
a that you are a Tele =Crime supporter.
' n d 3. Hold a neighborhood crime awareness
meeting in your area.
Aqk
�� You are the key to the success of
• Teie Crime. it-is a program by citizens and
The Board of Directors of Tele -Crime are for citizens.
rR esentatives of Brooklyn Park organizations Together, we can accomplish a great deal
residents. Tele- Crime has the full support towards reducing crime in our city.9'
of the organizations whose names appear in
this brochure, the city government and Brooklyn Park Mayor Jim Krautkremer
certainly, the police department.
The Brooklyn Park Police Department heartily Mtho benef its
endorses and encourages the success of
"Fete -Crime of Brooklyn Park. AP
This program will provide a valuable tool for
the police department to use in it's crime
solving efforts. Telemcgolumeft?
It is important to state that
_ this program is not the police Everyone who lives, works and owns a
department's, it is not the businoss in Brooklyn Park. Police rely heavily
city's. The idea came from on descriptions, tips and information provided
citizens, and is being run by citizens. When citizens get involved, police
by citizens. work is more effective. Our city will become a
This method of commu- better, safer place to live, work and play.
nity cooperation to
combat crime is proven
Mf V73 UN 0 0 0 1
effective in other cities ® around the the country. With ra
the citizens and police Tage C, 0M.
working together, the
P"TAl2-H-1- potential for dramatic .20 reduction in crime is
great. While Tele -Crime is Brooklyn Park's unique
No tax dollars will be crime prevention program, the idea is being
used to support the used in many communities throughout the
reward program, monies metropolitan area. The program has been
are and will be all donated by citizens and successful. One ,such large program helped
businesses who care about their community, over 200 felon cases and led to the
y .
e recover of more than 170,000 — all in 1 1 12
and want it a safe place. y
The police have pledged their help in making years and right in the Twin Cities area. The
Tete -Crime work in Brooklyn Park. support of the Brooklyn Park community is the
encourage you to give it your enthusiastic Key.
support as well.
Designed by The Design Factory
Brooklyn Park Police Chief Donald Davis
CUT HERE ® CUT HERE
`
I would like to make a tax - deductible Yes, I would like more information on r
donation to TELE- CRIME. Enclosed neighborhod crime prevention meetings.
❑ you will find a check or money order for ❑ Please call me.
$ ,
Send your check
me or money order to:
ddress zip Tele -Crime of Brooklyn Park
Phone Office Home 7575 Brooklyn Blvd.
Brooklyn Park, Minn. 55443
MEMO on MENEM MENEWE MENU
N o v c m.. n VIJ ha IL MR n d of
become Ups are useedull"
in Tips that are factual and can be proven.
.1huo0ved in this Names, addresses, dates and times of the
crime. Identifiable characteristics (i.e. an
cl mem accurate description) of the suspect. License
numbers and accurate description of vehicles.
Any personal knowledge of the crime.
It is time for all of Brooklyn Park to stop
progmlm? worrying about crime and DO something
about it. Tele - Crime is modeled after programs
Call the Tele- Crime number, 424 -4444 that are working right now in the Twin Cities
whenever you have any information about any area. Send your donation now and use
unsolved crime. Support Tele -Crime with a Tele -Crime 424- 4444. involved citizens can
personal donation. Without the generous make Brooklyn Park the WRONG place to
contributions of citizens and businesses, commit a crime.
Tele -Crime cannot exist. Finally, and this is
necessary in any good crime- prevention
program; call and report any suspicious S po n s o ri ng O r g anizations:
activity directly to the police _ Brooklyn Park Community Organization _
Brooklyn Park Chamber of Commerce'.
Brooklyn Park Jaycees
Brooklyn Park Jaycee Women
Brooklyn Park Lions Club
Brooklyn Park Athletic Association
• Brooklyn Park Youth Hockey Association
t Brooklyn Park Fire Department Volunteers
Palmer Lake V.F.W.
Brooklyn Park Police Association
{` North Hennepin Community College
i Brooklyn Park Parks and Recreation Department
` Brooklyn Park Rotary Club
.- + r
Brooklyn Park Girl Scouts
OF 21 ' 1, 0 L °" _ Community Emergency Assistance Program
P1 e7% Brooklyn Park League of Women Voters
Brooklyn Park Planning Commission
Brooklyn Park Economic Development Commission
The Design Factory
7575 Brooklyn Blvd. Brooklyn Park, Minn. 55443
BULK RATE
U. S. POSTAGE
PAID'
Permit No. 481
trooklrn Park. Minnesota
55428SUM634 C I�
RESIDENT 1 0 358 jy
6341 SUMTER AVE NO
MINNEAPOLIg
MN 55428 41
k
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its, adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
. RESOLUTION ORDERING ALLEY IMPROVI]MENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -14
(ALLEY BETWEEN DUPONT AND EMERSON AVENUES FROM 53RD to 54TH
AV ENUES NORTH)
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 82 -113 adopted the 14th day of June, 1982,
fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed improvement of the alley
between Dupont and Emerson Avenues from 53rd to 54th Avenues North by:
Alley Improvement Project No. 1982 -14; and
WHEREAS, ten days' published notice of the hearing through two weekly
publications of the required notice was given, and the hearing was held thereon
on the 12th day of July, 1982, at which time all persons desiring to be heard
were given an opportunity to be heard thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn
_Center, Minnesota, that it is hereby determined that it is necessary and in the
best interests of the City and the owners of property specially benefited thereby,.
that: •
1. The following improvement as proposed in Council Resolution No.
82 -113 adopted the 14th day of June, 1982, shall be constructed:
Alley Improvement Project No. 1982 -14
2. The City Engineer is designated as the engineer for this improvement.
The City Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for this
improvement.
3. The estimated cost of the project is $20,240.00.
4. The estimated cost will be financed by:
Special Assessments $20,240.00
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
__._. Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon.vote being taken thereon, the following,
voted in favor thereof:
and the following mooted against the same:
whereupon: said resolution, was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY
OF 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY
_ 7- L
BROOJA�
BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
TELEPHONE 561 -5440
C FENr"E' EMERGENCY- POLICE -FIRE
561 -5726
ENGINEER ° S REPORT
Alley Improvement Project No. 1982 - 14
PROJECT DESCRIPTION - Bituminous Alley Paving
PROJECT LOCATION - Between Dupont and Emerson Avenue from 53rd to
54th Avenues North
DISCUSSION: The City has received a petition requesting the
improvement of the alley between Dupont and Emerson
Avenues from 53rd to 54th Avenues North by placement
of bituminous surfacing. The petition was signed by
11 of.18 affected property owners (51 %) whose frontage
totals 53% of the abutting property. This improvement
was previously proposed in 1978 under Alley Paving
Improvement Project No. 1978 -11. Proceedings were
terminated by the City when the majority of
affected property owners spoke against the proposed
improvement.
It is recommended that the alley improvement project
be constructed in conformance with existing City policy,
whereby the 10 foot traveled width will be constructed
with 4 inches of gravel base and 2 inches of bituminous
surfacing over a properly graded and compacted sub-
grade. The "inverted 'crown" design of sloping the
pavement toward the center line will be used.
To provide proper drainage, a storm sewer must be
installed from the alley Easterly to Dupont Avenue."
An eas��:nerit must be obtained for this purpose.
In accordance with existing policy, it is proposed
that all rion- permanent driveways be paved in conjunc-
tion with the alley improvement; said paving to extend
to t he property line.
FINANCIAL
CONSIDERATIONS: In accordance with the Uniform Alley Improvement
- Policy, all costs related to alley construction,
storm sewer installation, turf restoration, and
restoration of existing permanent driveway surfac-
ing are considered assessable. All such costs
wczkwg Nose
Engineer's Report - Project No. 1982 -14
Page 2
will be apportioned uniformly against the
assessable frontage abutting the improvement.
The cost of constructing bituminous driveways
between the paved portion of the alley and
property line will be borne by the property owners
if no permanent surface previously existed.
Bituminous pavement construction beyond the
property line will be the responsibility of
the individual property owner.
Based upon the proposal outlined above, the
estimated project costs and resulting estimated
assessment rate is as follows:
Construction Cost $15,210.00
Contingencies 1,520.00
1 , Subtotal Construction Cost $16,730.00
Engineering (@ 90 of
Construction Cost) 1,510.00
Legal and Administration
(@ 20 of Construction Cost) 330.00
Capitalized Interest
(@ 10 of Construction Cost) 1,670.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL $20,240.00
Driveway Cost: $10.00 per Square Yard
Assessable Frontage: 1207.06 feet
Estimated Assessment: $16.77 per linear foot or
$17.00 per linear foot
Assessment Period: 10 Years
The proposed improvement project, as described in this report, is
feasible under the conditions outlined and at'the costs estimated.
Attached herewith is a project location map.depicti:ng the proposed
assessment district:
Respectf lly submitted,
SY naPP
Director of Public Works
Attachments
SK:jn
j
ci
12 5
44 q�J 9
130
45
Z11 5
4� I&
L ij
L X�
T 6
)U 37 !19 37 .3&!30 i �;354i 15541 2 12141 f
5* -A
ot 3z
kj �
qn�
60. 3.
w
Lj
2q 1 ___?
> >
4 2 -,f q . - 9 4 4 �
4, 1 . k � -A
8
7 4 k,)5 7 4
(5
26
5 - I I - -_ -_
6 6
[ �C6
7
5N� 4 7 �A
2�
(1c1i)
8 23 80 i.L3 ---a —
2 z 9
;v", 3of Z6
2 1�* 10
f
21 to
y _V
20 if - ze— ---i i__
_K20 lj. - It
9
A �' 4
12('P __ �kt'
Z�_ 6N
14 F-
I 4�2 6 \D
_57 Z
(lot)
J Ll b
4 i cl :? =
14
AVE.
(,Oc;)
30 lo
5
2 2
3ol Z
)v - _ —
2 0'
. o'
7
13418 3 2 \§y
0 2 5 -5 1
25 %5
w 6 (kk
12 �4 5 2 7 2�02'
LL A; W4) --237
34 134,' ASSESSMENT
2r,30� �:U
13 to, 4 4 22 9 IkkB) 2�5\ 9(14,3 DISTRICT J1 3ol
iy - C �'j 44
17-
14
2� "T
:34 8Z 20[�Al
�4 $z SD 4
15
1-7 14,k 1� )17
-4
16
I r :i: A 3" 'L L-1
M a v mirr li—ilms I I'm I 'I WIWI W r-aw-F-Ew!
if I m I on m
.5. j9. IV6. 1
Zi;40 35CO:i
01 PR'OJECT LOC I ATION a 34
y
33 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT MAP
ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJ. NO.1982-14
CITY 6301 SHINGLCtkEEK PARKWAY OF
`KLYN
ROO
BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
�.�
TELEPHONE 5615440
rp U E IL EMERGENCY- POLICE -FIRE
561-5720
June 18, 1982
John S. Tschohl, James E. Panay P.T. 01- 118 -21 -33 -0155
Norman L. Flct
4650 Nine Oaks Circle
Bloomington, MN 55437
Dear Property Owners:
At 8:00 P.M. on Monday, July 12, 1982, the Brooklyn Center City
Council will conduct public hearings on the proposed improvement
project identified in the enclosed "Notice of Public Hearing ".
This notice states the general nature of the improvement, the
estimated cost and the area to be assessed.
Your ro ert lies within the area proposed to be assessed for
F P Y P ro P
this improvement. Additional information has been included to
aid you in estimating potential assessment to your property.
The hearing is an opportunity for you to express an opinion on
the proposed improvement, if you desire to do so. The City
Council will consider your comments and input before a decision
is made to proceed with these projects.
You are encouraged to call the City Engineering.Department at
561 -5440, if you need additional information or have a question
which could be resolved.in advance-of the meeting.
Sincerely,
U
James N. Grube, P.E.
Assistant City Era - nee
Enclosures
JriG:jn } ��
°� cr/U�l maz es_
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
! RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND DIRECTING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR 69TH - '70TH AVENUE STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -09, SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1982 -10, WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -11,
ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -14, EVERGREEN PARK SOCCER
FIELD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 1982 -16 (CONTRACT 1982 -H)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The plans and specifications for Contract 1982 -H for the following
improvement prepared by the City Engineer are hereby approved
and ordered filed with the City Clerk:
69th - 70th Avenue Street Improvement Project No. 1982 -09
Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project No. 1982 -10
Water Main Improvement Project No. 1982 -11
Alley Improvement Project No. 1982 -14
Evergreen Park Soccer Field Project No. 1982 -16
2. The City Clerk shall advertise for bids for such improvements
by publications at least twice in the official newpaper and in
the Construction Bulletin, the date of second publication not
less than ten (1.0) days prior to the date for receipt of bids.
Said notice shall state that no bids will be considered unless
_sealed and filed with the City Clerk in the amount of not less
than five per cent (50) of the bid:
3. Bid date is set for August 12, 1982, at 11:00 o'clock, a.m.,
local time.
4. The City Manager and City Engineer are hereby authorized to
open and tabulate the bids.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
STUDY SESSION
JULY 1, 1982
CITY HALL.
CALL TO ORDER
The P ann� ng Commission met in study session and was called to order
by Chairman Pro tem Nancy Manson at 7:39 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chairman Pro tem Nancy Manson, Commissioners Molly Malecki, Mary
Simmons, Lowell Ainas, Carl Sandstrom and Donald Versteeg Chairman
Pro tem Manson explained that Chairman Lucht was unable to attend the
evening's meeting because he was out of town and was, therefore,
excused.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - June 17, 1982
Motion by Commissioner Sandstrom seconded by Commissioner Malecki to
approve the minutes of the June 17, 1982 Planning Commission meeting
as submitted. Voting in favor: Chairman Pro tem Manson, Commissioners
Malecki, Simmons, Sandstrom and Versteeg. Voting against: none. Not
voting: Commissioner Ainas. The motion passed.
TABLE APPLICATION NO. 82 023 (Bergstrom Realty Company)
Following the Chairman's explanation, the Secretary mentioned that the
applicant's representative for Application No. 82023 requested that
• the application be tabled until brought back at the applicant's
request. Motion by Commissioner Simmons seconded by Commissioner
Malecki to table Application No. 82023 until resubmitted by the appli-
cant. Voting in favor: Chairman Pro tem Manson, Commissioners Malecki
Simmons, Ainas, Sandstrom and Versteeg. Voting against: none. The
motion passed unanimously.
APPLIC NO. 82028 (Deborah Tobako)
T e:Secretary then sntro uce the first business item, a request for
a special use permit to conduct ceramics classes in the basement of
the residence at 56 .6' Girard Avenue North. The Secretary reviewed
the contents of the staff report (see Planning Commission Information
Sheet for Application No. 82028 attached). The Secretary also pointed
out that the special use permit granted to Mrs. LaVonne Malikowski.of.
5507 Logan Avenue North did not comprehend any on- street parking,° He
stated that in that case Logan Avenue is a busier street and that there
is a bus stop roughly in front'of the Malikowski residence which made
on- street parking less appropriate in that case. He stated that the
Planning Commission, it this case, would have to determine that there
is a need for on- street parking to such an extent that the-home
occupation would not be feasible without allowing on-- street parking.
Commissioner Simmons stated that it seemed to her the ordinance requires
the Planning Commission to monitor the need for on- street parking for
this home occupation. She added that she did not feel it was fair to
limit home occupations in ways that other residents are not limited
with respect to on- street.parking. The Secretary stated that the
ordinance sets up criteria to, review home occupations on a case -by-
ease basis. He stated that this' home occupation will likely grow and
7 -1 -82 -1
that the Planning Commission may want to require that the application
be brought back later for review regarding the need for on- street
parking. Commissioner Sandstrom stated that he agreed with Commis:-
sioner Simmons that other residents seemed to have more rights than
_persons having a home occupation. He stated that he did not see a need
for restricting the right of 4 resident who has a home occupation to
not have any on-street-parking.
Commissioner Simmons e•xplained.that when the ordinance was amended
instituting "the. procedure of making a determination of need for on
street parking, the number of
• p g, persons allowed in a class, as part of
a home occupation,. was increased from 4 to 10. She stated that re-
quiring all parking to be kept off.- street may lead persons with art-
classes to build bigger.driveways and pave a substantial portion.of
their front yard. She stated that this would not seem to be consistent
with residential character of the neighborhood. The
Secretary acknowledged that this could be a result of restricting
parking to off - street. He pointed out,.however, that there are
parking restrictions generally on all residents which limit on- street
parking to .6 hours during, the day and 4 hours at night. Chairman Pro
tem Manson stated that she felt the ordinance allowed the Planning
Commission the option of permitting on- street parking when a home
occupation is not feasible without it. She then called on the appli-
cant and asked whether there were any additional comments. Mrs.
Tobako stated that she had nothing further to 'add.
Commissioner Simmons asked-how many cars could fit on the driveway.-
Mrs.. Tobako answered that five cars could normally fit on the driveway,'
possibly six if they were small cars. She also mentioned that there
is an alley behind the house which is unpaved. Commissioner Simmons s
asked Mrs. Tobako whether she could do without on- street parking.
Mrs. Tobako stated that based on the size of the class already signed
up, she would not °need on- street parking, but added that she expected
class size to change over time and would like to have the option of
parking on the street.
Commissioner Ainas asked whether Mrs. Tobako had talked with neighbors
about the anticipated need for on- street parking. Mrs. Tobako answered
_in; affirmative and stated that those neighbors she has talked with
have not objected. Commissioner Ainas stated that he wondered about
the reaction of the neighbors because he had driven down that street
the night before and saw many cars parked along the street in front
of other people's houses.
PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Pro tem Manson then opened the meeting for a public hearing
- and asked whether anyone present wished to comment on the application.
No one present spoke.
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
Motion by Commissioner Sandstrom seconded by Commissioner Malecki too
close the public hearing. The motion passed unanimously.
There followed a lengthy discussion regarding the determination of
need for on- street parking. Commissioner Simmons stated that the
ordinance allows Mrs. Tobako to have 10 students, but that without on
street parking of at least two spaces, it would be impossible to have
the number of students which the ordinance permits. The Secretary
stated that a limit of two on- street parking spaces might still
7 -1 -82 -2- -
constrain the number of students in the class. He reviewed the three
considerations for allowing on- street parking in association with
home occupations and suggested that a finding be made that on- street
parking was necessary and feasible, or not. In answer to .a question
from Commissioner Ainas, the Secretary stated that he did not feel the
Planning Commission would paint itself into a corner if it allowed two
on- street parking spaces for the proposed home occupation. He stated
that each home occupation has to be looked at on -a case -by -case basis.
He explained that different circumstances can lead to different con
.ditions applying to the approval of a home occupation or could lead
.to disapproval of a home occupation.
ACT ION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. .82028 (Deborah Tobako)
Motion by Commissioner Sandstrom seconded by Commis ner Ai.nas to
recommend approval of Application No. 82028 in consideration of a
finding that the proposed home occupation would not be feasible without
on street parking,- and subject to the following conditions
1. The permit is issued to the applicant as operator of the
facility and is nontransferable
2. The permit is subject to all codes, ordinances, and
regulations ulataons. An violation thereof shall b e grounds
for revocation.
3. No more than 10 students shall attend any one class in
accordance with Section 35 -406 of the Zoning Ordinance
4. All parking shall be off- street on space provided by
K 1
the applicant to the maximum extent feasible. On- street
parking shall be limited to two spaces in front of the
applicant's property as the need arises.
5. The hours of operation shall be no more than: Monday to
Thursday, 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. and Saturday, 10:00
a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
6. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of
the Building Official prior to the issuance of the
Special Use Permit.
Voting in favor: Chairman Pro tem Manson., Commissioners Maleck,
Simmons, Ainas, Sandstrom and Versteeg. Voting against: none. The
motion passed unanimously.
APPLICATION NO. 82020 (Hussman Investment Company
-
The Secretary e x1 intro uce e th next item of usiness, a request by
' _
Hussman Investment Company to rezone from Rl to R3, two parcels of
Viand at 811 azld 821 70th Avenue North and a remnant parcel presently
part of the City's Maintenance Annex at 69th and Dupont Avenues North.
The Secretary reviewed the contents of the staff report (see Planning
Commission Information Sheet for Application No - . 82020 attached).
Chairman Pro tem Manson observed that when the'Hi Crest Square Estates
rezoning was dealt with, the Planning Commission recommended that the
rezoning not be effective until the plat was filed. Commissioner
Simmons asked whether the Planning Commission could recommend the
same condition here as well even if the does not suggest it.
7 -1 -82 -3-
4
The Secretary answered in the affirmative..
Commissioner Simmons stated that the City has no control over the type
of development once the land has been rezoned, as to whether the
project is owner- occupied or rental, or the quality of the units., The
Secretary agreed, stating that the final step is not taken until the
land to be rezoned is actually described in the Zoning Ordinance.
Commissioner Simmons alluded to a` portion of the minutes to the North-
east Neighborhood Advisory Group meeting in which the members present
preferred "quality: townhouses" over "cheap single - family houses."
Commissioner Simmons stated that with the mortgage market of today,
there can really be no promise that townhouses_ will be of high quality
any more than single- family. She asked whether the neighbors under-
stand that reality and the. fact that the City cannot control the
quality of the townhouses. Chairman Pro'tem Manson stated that she
believed that the neighbors liked the concept of an owner- occupied
development where there would be site and building plan review by the
City Council. She stated that she felt a plat creating the individual
townhouse lots should be filed before the rezoning takes place.
Commissioner Simmons _stated that she favored a plat and site and build -
ing plans to be submitted prior to the rezoning, but asked whether a
plat would actually guarantee an 'owner-occupied development. The
Secretary answered that a plat would not guarantee that the project
would be owner - occupied, but that it does . set up the mechanism for the
townhouses to be sold. In response to another_ question from Commiss-
ioner Simmons, Chairman Pro tem Manson explained that the procedure
of requiring a plat prior to the rezoning was discussed at the neigh -
borhood meeting.- Commissioner Sandstrom stated that, based on his
knowledge of the real estate market, it is not really feasible to
build townhouses for rent at this _time.
Chairman Pro tem- Manson then called on the applicant to speak. Mr.
James Merila, representing Bergstrom Realty Company,stated that, of
the townhouse projects which have been subdivided, 98% of the town-
house units are owner- occupied. Commissioner Simmons stated that that
may have been the-case in the past, but that things change over time.
The Planning Assistant pointed out that the rental section of The
Ponds has been - subdivided and that that project has probably not
been 'included in the figures quoted by Mr. Merila. He added that The
Ponds rental section was subdivided in the anticipation that the units
would be sold after seven years. The Secretary explained that the
rental section of The Ponds was built under a federal subsidy and
that normally - subsidized 'townhouse units must be rental for at least
20 years, but that in this case the period was reduced to seven
years after which the units could be sold as condominiums.
Commissioner Simmons asked whether Hussman Investment was willing to
provide site plans as a condition of the rezoning. Mr. Merila
answered that the applicant would like some indication from the Plan -
ning Commission as to whether they would approve the rezoning before
- incurring the cost of developing a preliminary plat and site and
building plans. There followed a brief discussion regarding the
procedure for acting on the rezoning. The Secretary recommended
that the Planning Commission first look at how the rezoning meets,
does not meet, the,guidelines for rezonings and the Planning Commis-
sion may then indicate to the applicant that they would like to see
a plat before acting on the rezoning.
-1 -82 -4-
PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Pro tem Manson then - reopened the public hearing on Application
asked bather anyone resent wished to
comment on the
No. 82020. She. a w p
Y
application:
• Mrs. Melba Evanson of 800 - 69th Avenue North stated briefly that the
property.in question should remain Rl. She contended that the proposal
constituted spot zoning which is forbidden under the City's Zoning
Ordinance.
Mr. Paul Rosso of 7 Ortman Street, Minneapolis, stated; that the Com-
prehensive Plan map recommending mid - density residential for the area
north of his sister's residence does not recommend rezoning the
property to R3. Mr. Rosso stated that the realignment of 69th and 70th
Avenues North had not been finalized. He stated that he had attended
a MN /DOT hearing on the Highway 252 project and pointed out that
comments can still be made until July 12, 1982. Chairman tem
Manson stated that the realignment of 69th and 70th is not the question
before the Planning Commission. Mr. Rosso answered that the realign-
ment is an important assumption in the request to rezone the property
to R3. He asked the Planning Commission to deny the application.
Chairman Pro tern Manson asked if there were any other questions.
Russell Fierst of Hussman Investment Company stated that the owner
would have no objection if the Planning Commission asked for site,
landscaping, and platting plans before going to the City Council.
Chairman Pr.o tern Manson stated that she would like the rezoning, along
with the site plans and plat,to come back to the Planning Commission
for approval as a package before going to the City Council. Commiss-
ioner Sandstrom stated that he concurred completely with that judgment.
• The Secretary recommended that the Planning Commission discuss the
merits of the rezoning and then table the application until a plat
IS submitted.
Commissioner Versteeg asked whether the roadway going by the property
had, in fact; been approved. The Secretary stated that the City
Council has ordered the project and is proceeding to condemn land for
right -of -way acquisition. He added that the City has approved a con-
ceptual plan for signals at 70th Avenue North and a.- cul -de -sac at
y 69th Avenue North. Commissioner Versteeg asked whether the rezoning
would be approved with approval of the site plan. Chairman Pro tem
Manson explained that the - rezoning and the site . plan would be approved
under separate actions. Mrs. Melba Evanson stated that she has not
sold her land for right -of -way to the City. The Assistant City
Engineer explained that -the rest of the land needed for the right -of-
way has been acquired.
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
close
Commissioner
Malecki seconded b
Motion b .omm Y Commissioner Ainas to
Y
'c earin The motion assed unanimously.,
the public hearing. p
Chairman Pro tem Manson then polled the Planning Commission as to ,
their feelings-regarding the proposed rezoning. Commissioner Malecki
stated that the proposed
g as far as the guidelines for rezonings, h p p
townhouse project would be a benefit by adding affordable housing to
the community. She added that she did not see any guidelines which
were not met by the rezoning. Chairman Pro tem Manson asked whether
7 -1 -82 -5-
L
Commissioner Malecki considered the proposal spot zoning. Commis
sioner Malecki answered that, inasmuchas` the rezoning falls within
the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan, she did not consider
it to be spot zoning.
Commissioner Simmons stated that she felt the rezoning was in line
with the long range plan recommendation for mid- density residential
development is that area. She noted the existence of an R4 develop -
ment to the east. She stated that she sympathized with the concerns
of the property owners., She added that the concerns of the property
owners would probably be met if the requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance and the conditions'expressed by the Planning Commission
were met by the applicant. Commissioner Ainas stated that he had
I'
reviewed the: guidelines carefully and has concluded that the rezoning
proposal is not spot zoning and should.be approved.`
Commissioner Sandstrom asked whether there was neighborhood opposition.
Chairman Pro*tem Manson explained that, initially, all of the property,'
owners abutting the land in question were opposed to the rezoning.
She stated that at the last neighborhood meeting all of the neighbors
except the Evansons acquiesced to the rezoning. She explained that
most of the neighbors liked the idea of the City Council review of
site plans which.is required of an R3 development, but not in the
case of single- family. Commissioner Sandstrom stated that he did
not consider the proposal spot zoning.
Commissioner Versteeg asked whether Brooklyn Center has a history of
spot zoning. The Secretary answered that he was not aware that there
had been any spot,zoni.ng in Brooklyn Center since the adoption of its
Comprehensive Plan in the latter 1960 He explained that spot zoning,
would have to be determined by a court and he was not aware of any case
in which the City was found guilty p g of spot zoning. Commissioner
Versteeg stated that he did not feel the approval of the application
would constitute spot zoning. He stated that he would go along with
the change in zoning to 'R3
g g
Chairman Pro tem. Manson stated that her initial feeling was in favor
of single- family homes of the quality that could be built for a•reason
able price five to ten years ago. She stated that right now she felt
the rezoning to R3 is proper if accompanied by a plat and site plan.
ACTION TABLING APPLICATION NO. 82020 (Hussman Investment Company)
Motion by Comm sioner Simmons seconded by Commissioner Sandstrom to
table Application No. 82020 until the applicant returns with a plat
and site and building plans for the land in question. Voting in
favor: Chairman Pro tern Manson, Commissioners Malecki, Simmons,
Sandstrom, Ainas and Versteeg. Voting against: none. The motion
passed unanimously.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
The Secretary briefly directed the Commission's attention to a memo-
randum prepared by the Assistant City Engineer regarding drainage
ponds. He explained that the memo includes a review of three ponds
somewhat similar to that proposed for the Hi Crest Square Estates
development located in Brooklyn Park. He also asked the Planning-
Commission to review the City's ordinance requiring fencing of outdoor S
swimming pools. He stated that these considerations would be reviewed,
when the site plans come back before the Planning Commission.
7 -1 -82 -6-
The Secretary also pointed out that a site plan illustrating the
setback deduction had been prepared for the'Planning Commission's in-
formation. He explained that the staff did not recommend changing
the building setbacks, only eliminating the setback deduction from
the method for calculating the number of units allowed on multi- family
• zoned properties.
There followed a lengthy discussion regarding drainage ponds. Com-
missioner Simmons expressed concern for young children possibly.falling,
down into the water and argued that the City should require barriers
to prevent this from happening. The Assistant City Engineer stated
that some risk is involved with any body of water and left it to the
Planning Commission to decide whether the proposed pond design repre-
sented an acceptable risk or unacceptable risk. The Secretary pointed
out that there are a lot of liabilities in life and that he was not
sure that the City has the responsibility for eliminating all risks
associated with the projects it approves. The Assistant City Engineer
stated that he was not convinced about what should be done. He ex-
plained that the memo looks at other manmade bodies water similar
to that proposed for the Hi Crest Square Estates development. He•
assured the Commission that the staff are not taking a position on
the question until they have direction from the Planning Commission
and City Council. He explained that the memo was intended purely as
an informational tool.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Ainas seconded by Commissioner Malecki to
adjourn the meeting of the Planning Commission. The motion passed
unanimously. The Planning Commission adjourned at 9.44 p.m.
•
Chairman
7 -1 -82 -7-
s
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 82028
Applicant: Deborah Tobako
Location: 5636 Girard Avenue North
Request: Special Use Permit - Home Occupation
The applicant requests special use permit approval to conduct group ceramics classes
in the basement of her home at 5636 Girard Avenue North. The property is zoned Rl
and is surrounded by other single - family homes and one duplex across the street.
Mrs. Tobako has submitted a letter (attached) in which she explains what she intends
. to do. In the first year, classes would probably be 6 to 8 people, one night per :
week, from 6 :30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., Wednesday evenings. As other class sessions are
needed, they would be held on weekday evenings (Mon.- Thurs..) or Saturday 10:00 a.m.
to 1:00 p.m. The driveway space available can accommodate at least .four cars and
possibly six. The first year, two students will be dropped off for class. (She
has suggested that an additional car or two could park in the alley behind the house.
However, parking in alleys is prohibited by Section 27 -120 of the Traffic Ordinance).
Some parking on the street may be necessary. Mrs Tobako states that the rear
entrance to the home will be used to let students in. A fire extinguisher will be
placed in the area where the classes will be held and there are four windows along
that side of the basement. An electric kiln will be used for firing ceramics.
The key question regarding this application is the possible need for on- street
parking. Section 35 -406 of the Zoning Ordinance, Subsection 7 states that: "No
automobile parking related to the special home occupation shall be permitted on
the street provided, however, that upon a finding that the Special Home Occupation
is not feasible without on- street parking, the City Council may authorize parking
on the street based upon a consideration of Section.35 -220.2 (the Standards for
Special Use Permits) and of the following:
(a) The amount of the applicant's street frontage.
(b) The rights of adjacent residents to park on the street.
(c) Preservation of the residential character of the neighborhood.
The lot on which Mrs. Tobakot house sits is 72.3' wide and the street frontage, ex-
clusive of the driveway, snould - easily accommodate two cars. Therefore, it would
seem that the rights of adjacent residents could be preserved if no more than two
cars associated with the home occupation were allowed to park on the street.
Preservation of the residential character of the neighborhood is a subjective
judgment which must reflect general attitudes regarding a given level of traffic.
Last year, the Planning Commission and City Council approved a home occupation
involving ceramics classes on Logan Avenue North in which classes were held five
nights per week. The number of classes proposed here seems well within that level.
However, on- street parking in that case was prohibited.
The main consideration may well be whether or not the home occupation is feasible
.without on- street parking. As the standards indicate-,.this-is the first criteria
and the authorization for on- street parking can be granted then only after con-
sideration of the other factors.
The Building Official inspected the premises on "June 24, 1982 and made certain
recommendations for remodeling the basement and signing the path of exit directly
to the exterior (see typed report attached). A 5 lb.fire extinguisher has also
been recommended.
7 -1 -82 -1
f
i
Application No. 82028 continued
A public hearing has been scheduled and notices have been sent.
Altogether, the application for special use permit seems to be in order upon fu
rthe
determination of the necessity for on- street parking. Approval is recommended
subject to at least the following conditions:
1. The permit is issued to the applicant as operator of the 'facility
and :is nontransferable.
2. The permit is subject to all codes, ordinances, and.regulations.
Any violation thereof shall.be grounds for revocation:
3. No more than 10 students shall attend any -one class in accordance''
with Section 35 -406 of the Zoning Ordinance.
4. All parking shall be off- street on space provided by the applicant
to the maximum extent feasible. On- street parking shall be limited
to two spaces at an appropriate location as the need arises.
5. The hours of operation shall be no more than: Monday to Thursday,
6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. and Saturday 10:00 am. to 1•:00 p.m.
6. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations . of'the Building
Official ,prior to the issuance of the Special Use Permit.
e
7 -1 -82 -2-
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 82020 :.,..� .
Applicant: Hussman Investment
Location: 811 and 821 - 70th Avenue North
Request: Rezoning from R1 to R3
As the Planning Commission probably recalls, the rezoning request from R1 to R3
involves two lots and a remnant parcel of City -owned land south of 70th Avenue
North extended, east of the City's Maintenance Annex at 69th and Dupont Avenues
(see map attached).
This application was initially reviewed by the Planning Commission on April 29, 1982-
and was referred at that time to the Northeast Neighborhood Advisory Group. The
Northeast Neighborhood Advisory Group met on June 3, 1982 without a.quorum of its
members present, and on June 16 when it recommended approval of the rezoning by a
unanimous vote of the members present (see minutes submitted by Chairman Ron Boman
attached). Of note is the fact that only one abutting property owner (Melba Evanson)
now solidly opposes the proposed rezoning to R3.
Commissioners are urged to consider past communications on this matter in making
their decisions on the (past minutes, letters, site sketches, and staff
reports are attached for your reference).
It should be pointed out that the rezoning application is not accompanied at this
time by a plat or site and building plan application. Action on the rezoning should
be based mainly on the location of the property relative to the level of public
access and compatibili surrounding land uses. Discussion of the particular
• type of development would best be deferred until a specific development plan is
brought forward. Staff would agree that rezoning of the .91 acre of land to R3
need not be considered spot zoning as it is part of a larger area recommended in
the Comprehensive Plan for mid- density residential development. We would also agree
that the proposed zoning is consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses and
with access off a collector street having traffic projected at up to 7,000 cars
per day.
As the Commission is aware, zoning of property does not control the form of ownership.
Whatever representations have been made regarding a prospective project, merely
rezoning the land does not assure that a development will be owner - occupied as
opposed to rental. For that reason, it is essential to evaluate the proposal based
on the circumstances affecting the bare parcel of land, on potential structures
or improvements which, of themselves, have no zoning designation.
As with all rezonings, approval must be consistent with Section 35 -208 of the City.
Ordinances, the Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines (copy attached). a
The public hearing was continued by the Planning Commission on April 29, 1982 and
surrounding property owners have been notified of the meeting. Also attached for.
the Commission's review is a 13 page submission regarding the rezoning from Mr.
Paul Dan Rosso dated April 30, 1982 and received by the Planning and Inspection
Department on June 17, 1982. Mr. Rosso seems to take issue with the rezoning
on the basis that the proposed Comprehensive Plan does not authorize the R3 use
of the land in question. The .Commission's attention is directed to the attached
Table 14 (Land U s e Plan Revisions) and Figure 15 (Land Use Plan Revisions map o f
the Comprehensive Plan which designates this property and the property to the east
for a future mid - density residential use.
7 -1 -82
h
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G Splinter City Manager
FROM: Jim Lindsay, Chief of Police
DATE: July 8, 1982
SUBJECT: Liquor License Application of T. Wrights
Attached please find a background investigation conducted by
Investigator A. Paul Monteen. The investigation did develop
one problem area. One of the stockholders, a Robert Larsen,
also holds a liquor license in the State of Florida. A check
of that license e indicated several violations under the Florida
alcohol laws. The club in question was the Jockey Club of
Miami, Florida. These same violations in Minnesota would prohibit
the issuing of a license.
Monteen was dispatched to Miami to conduct a thorough investi-
gation of these violations. The details of the violations are
listed in his report. After a complete review of the violations,
it was learned that Florida has a statute that allows the
violator to admit guilt by agreeing in writing that the
violation was committed and they would cease any further
violations. With this went along with what is called a civil
penalty. By taking this route, the violation is .removed from
the criminal aspect and made a civil violation. The manager
of the Jockey Club exercised this option in all of the 'violations
listed. Consequently, these violations are not viewed as
felonies which would have prohibited the issuing of the license
here. We have also checked with the Liquor Control Commissioner
of Minnesota who agrees that the violations as listed would not
prohibit the issuing of a license in Minnesota.
It should be noted that Larsen was not on the premise at any
time that these violations occurred: It is our- belief that
Larson was not aware of the violations. The manager of the
Club was the person that signed the stipulations and paid the
fines. We have discovered nothing that would implicate Larsen
with the violations.
I have personally met with the President, Kenn Rockler, and the
On- premise Manager, Thomas Stevens and other members of the
corporation. We have reviewed the State statutes, and City
ordinances regulating the operation of a • l-iquor- license in
Brooklyn Center. They have been most cooperative with the
investigation and assisted us in every wag. They are all aware
of the problems in the Florida club. They have assured me that
management at T. Wrights is going to be more responsible,
® I recommend that the intoxicating liquor license for T. Wrights
be approved.
The following is a resume of the investigation of Case #82- 09615,
investigation of Minnesota State Corporation Matarese; doing
business as: T. Wrights, in application for an on -sale liquor
license and a Sunday intoxicating liquor license as issued by the
City of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota.. This resume
has been prepared by Investigator A. Paul Monteen and has been
transcribed and typewritten by Barbara Pietrzak., clerk- typist for
the Brooklyn Center Police Department.
APPLICANT:
Matarese, Incorporated; doing business as: T. Wrights
5800 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
560- 7880
Kenneth 'Mark ROCKLER, President (12% of outstanding stock)
17820 Comstock Road Business address:
Wayzata, MN 55391, 3310 South Highway 101
473 =1750 Wayzata, MN 55391
475 -2215
Robert Milton LARSEN, Vice - President (400 of outstanding stock)
7141 Galpin Boulevard 7801 East Bush Lake Road, Suite 210
Excelsior, MN 55331 Bloomington, MN 55435
474 -0283 835 -9580
Miami residence:
11045 North Bayshore Drive
Miami, FL
(305)893 -3344
Daniel Francis WRIGHT, Secretary (12% of outstanding stock)
3520 West 46th Street 3310 South Highway 101
Minneapolis, MN 55410 Wayzata, MN 55391
926 -6256 475 -2215
William Gerard LIGHT, Treasurer (12 %'of outstanding stock)
10511 South Cedar Lake Road #411 3310 South Highway 101
Minnetonka, MN 55343 Wayzata, MN 55391
545 -2945 475 -2215
Thomas Edward WRIGHT, Stockholder (12% outstanding stock)
3901 Skyview Road 3310 South Highway 101
Minnetonka, MN 55343 Wayzata, MN 55391
839 -1550 _ -2215
Thomas Charles STEVENS, On- premises Manager (12% outstanding stock)
1380 Park Drive 5800 Shingle Creek Parkway
Orono, MN 55364 Brooklyn Center, MN 55431
472 -3647 560 -7880
Resume of Investigator Monteen Case #82- 09515 Page 2
INVESTIGATION MATERIALS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS FILE:
An application for on -sale intoxicating-liquor
An application for Sunday intoxicating liquor .
An application for intoxicating liquor and supporting affidavit,
part 1 General Information
An application for on -sale intoxicating liquor, part 2 - Personal
Information in the name of all parties listed above
A copy of the articles of incorporation as filed by Matarese,_ Inc.
December 11, 1981 and sealed by the State of Minnesota
A copy of the lease between Commercial Partners, Inc. and the
business T. Wrights
A copy of the Florida liquor license of the Jockey Club of Miami,
Florida with the attached corporate information
A copy of the State of Florida, Division of Alcoholic Beverages,
Case #8- 3430 -A
A copy of the Florida Division of Alcoholic Beverages Case #32411 -A
A copy of the Florida Department of Alcoholic Beverages, Case
#34164 -A
T. PP g
Wri hts Saloon and Supper Club at 5800 Shingle Creek Parkway is
g
owned and operated by the Minnesota Corporation known as the
Matarese, Incorporated whose stockholders are listed above. In
beginning the investigation of the background of the individual
stockholders, Investigator MONTEEN contacted the Hennepin County
Sheriff's Office, Criminal Records and Warrants Division, and
found no contact with any of the individuals. Furthermore, MONTEEN
checked the files of the Brooklyn Center Police Department, the
MINCIS files, the National Crime Information Centers and the local
police departments, dependin% on the residential addresses of each
of the above- listed individuals With the following exceptions,
there were no records of any criminal activity of any of the above-
listed parties.
The records of the Minnetonka Police Department showed that
.individuals had complained of an assault on the part of
Thomas WRIGHT and an assault on the part of Kenneth ROCKLER
involving their ejection from T. Wright's Saloon and Supper
Cl in Minnetonka on Highway 101 Neither of these cases
Club to ka g ay .
were substantiated nor were formal complaints issued and.
Investigator MONTEEN did read the reports as filed to the
Minnetonka Police Department and is satisfied that the
inc ' dents were handled properly by the Minnetonka Police
Dep rtment.
ROCKLE , LIGHT, STEVENS, and the WRIGHTS all have valid driver's
iicens s with the State of Minnesota, while LARSEN has a valid
Florida driver's license.
Resume of Investigator Monteen Case #82- 09615 Page 3
In order to finance the operation known as T. Wrights Supper Club
o" and Saloon, the Matarese has approached the following lending
companies.
First Brookdale Bank has financed an interim loan in the amount of
$182,000.00 and according to Frank SLAWSON, Vice - President and
Loan Officer, the Matarese has a healthy financial basis, and
although the initial loan for $182,000.00 he presumes will be taken
over by one of the major leasing companies,.SLAWSON indicated that
First Brookdale Bank is open to continuing a business relationship
with the Matarese Incorporated group and would extend the terms
of that loan if they desired.
MONTEEN then spoke to Mark KELLER (telephone number 828 -1028) of
the Gelco Corporation. KELLER advised MONTEEN that Gelco Corpora-
tion would be financing $333,000.00 of the T. Wrights operation
and also indicated that he acted as broker for a'loan with'I.F.G.
in the amount of $300,000.00, Wicks Leasing in the amount of
$150,000.00 and the Leasemore Corporation in the amount of $140,000.00.
° MONTEEN also apoke with Randy PAYANT (telephone 340 - 3000) at the
National City Bank who indicated that National City had not
reached a final figure with the corporation, however National _ City
Bank would be willing to do business with them probably up to
four or five hundred thousand dollars.
• From these figures, it would appear that the Matarese Incorporated
has an available cash financing in the neighborhood of 1.3 million
to 1.5 million dollars.
As a normal investigative function, MONTEEN did contact the
issuer of all other intoxicating liquor licenses from the infor-
mation provided in the application. The Minnetonka Police
Department in the City of Minnetonka gave T. Wrights Supper Club
of Wayzata, Minnesota a good recommendation stating that the
complaints filed have been investigated and have been satisfied
to their standards quickly.
Furthermore, the City of Maplewood stated that North Country
Vineyards and Spirits has no record of violations, although they
have been in business only a short time according to Lieutenant
KUSICK of the Maplewood Police Department.
Finally MONTEEN checked with the Florida Division of Alcoholic
Beverages and Tobacco for the license of the Jockey Club located
at 11111 Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida 33161. Investigator
MONTEEN talked with Louis J. TERMINELLO,'Beverage Agent /2 and
TERMINELLO advised MONTEEN that the - Jockey Club did hold an• "S"
license as issued by the State of Florida, permit #23- 005935.
Resume of Investigator MONTEEN Case #82 -09615 Page 4
TERMINELLO 'advised MONTEEN that the file on the Jockey Club
indicated three incidents where the Jockey Club had been issued
a notice to show cause why beverage license.should not have
`civil penalty assessed against it or be suspended or revoked.
The first indicated that on February 11, 1974 the Jockey Club'
failed to have an approved party on the premises when inspected
by the Alcoholic Beverages Personnel. As well, they failed to
post a license on the premises and noted that the stockholders
of the club had changed and that the stockholders had not been
fingerprinted for the purpose of identification by the Alcoholic
Beverages Division. It should be noted for the purpose of clarity
that Florida law issues a license to a liquor establishment, not
the individuals in ownership of the establishment and that the
liquor license can be bought and sold on the public market.
Therefore, when purchased, the purchasers failed to notify FDABT
of the change in status of the stockholders. The Jockey Club,
represented by Herbert J. :ALLEN, stipulated that they had
violated that section of the Florida liquor laws and on the
12th of March, 1974, ALLEN paid a $100.00 civil penalty and the
club was brought into compliance with the licensing laws.
On May 5, 1979, agents of.the Florida Division of Alcoholic
Beverages and Tobacco entered the Jockey Club and at that time
noted that there was a raffle and distribut =ion of prizes as well
as paramutual booths for betting set up on the premises. Further
investigation showed that the raffle, as well as the betting
booths, were for the purpose of raising money for the Florida
Society for the Prevention of Blindness. The raffle was for
liquor which had been donated to the club by the Society for the
Prevention of Blindness and the paramutual betting was on the
Kentucky Derby and horserace movies and the benefits of the
paramutual betting were divided 70% back to the g players and'30% P Y
to the Society for the Prevention of Blindness. The Society for
the Prevention of Blindness operated the program and received
the benefits of profits. The Jockoy Club in and of itself received
no financial gain from either the raffle nor the paramutual
betting. According.to the Notice to Show Cause, Eddie TABBADO
stipulated that the Jockey Club was in fact in violation, though
there was no malicious intent to violate Florida law and paid
a $1,000.00 civil penalty.
In the last incident, the Florida Division of 'Alcoholic Beverages
and Tobacco was doing a related investigation on Southern Wine
and Spirits Distributing Company for numerous violations of
Florida's Tied House Evil Law and as a result of that investigation
found that the Jockey Club had accepted liquor in exchange for
'the removal of another distributor's liquor from the shelf.. The
final result of the case was that Southern Wine and Spirits lost
their license to do business in Florida and the Jockey Club
stipulated that they had in fact received the liquor and paid a
•$2,000.00 civil penalty.
Resume of Investigator MONTEEN ease #82= 09615 Page 5
Because of the nature of the violations in Florida, Investigator
MONTEEN did go to Miami, Dade County, Florida and did an.intensive
investigation of the local agency's involvement with the Jockey
Club. MONTEEN started with the Florida Division of Alcoholic
Beverages and Tobacco and received copies of `their case file
concerning the Jockey Club. Furthermore, MONTEEN did check with
the Miami Police Department in the name of Robert Milton LARSEN
and found that no contact had been made.
MONTEEN, accompanied by Louis J. TERMINELLO of the Alcoholic
Beverages and Tobacco Division then spoke to Sergeant Tom TRETOLA
of the Dade County Public Safety Department's Narcotics Intelligence
and Vice Division, which would have jurisdiction over the Jockey
Club and TRETOLA indicated that the Jockey Club in an of itself
had been no problem, however, the Jockey Club had been on occasion`
inhabited by organized crime figures. MONTEEN spoke with Mark W.
SOKOLOWSKI of the Organized Crime and Vice Unit of the Dade Metro
Police Department and he also indicated that they had no files on N
Robert M. LARSEN in particular, however they had knowledge that
organized crime figures had been known to-inhabit the area known
as_ the Jockey Club.
TERMINELLO and MONTEEN were able to obtain identification and a
membership card for the Jockey Club and on June 29, 1982 did
enter the Jockey Club. On this occasion, the investigators sat
in the main bar at the _Jockey-Club and spoke to one John ZEPPO,
.a bartender at the club. According to ZEPPO -the purchase of a
condominium in the complex known as the Jockey Club included
membership in the club itself, however, _a social membership was
also available in the Jockey Club. This social membership
required the signature of.two current members on the application
as well as a $1,000.00 application fee. Having been approved,
a $500.00 annual membership fee for social membership and $750.00
annual membership fee for a tennis membership would allow you the
use of the facilities at the Jockey Club.
During the time that MONTEEN and TERMINELLO'spent at the Jockey
Club,. no recognizable organized crime figures nor overt acts of
criminal . or violation of Florida beverage laws were
observed by MONTEEN or TERMINELLO.
On June 30, 1982,. Investigator MONTEEN and Agent Bob,CHASTAIN of
the Division of Alcoholic Beverage and Tobacco, went to the Dade
County Organized Crime Division and at that. time spoke with
George SCHAFER and Jack; CURTAIN concerning the Jockey Club Mr,
SCHAFER and MONTEEN went through the' files of the' organized crime .
division and found the only files that were opened were those
concerning real estate transactions at the premises of the Jockey
Club and the'only files which had been followed up to any extent
were real estate transactions in which organized crime figures or
• suspected organized crime figures had been buying or selling real
Resume of Investigator MONTEEN Case #82 -09615 Page 6
estate in the Club. No file in the name of Robert Milton LARSEN
for any criminal activity was located, however LARSEN's name did
appear in the real estate transactions on occasion.
The Florida Division of Law Enforcement files in Miami were also
opened to MONTEEN and CHASTAIN and the only card in that file
concerning Robert M. LARSEN concerned the transaction of the
initial purchase of the Jockey Club by Robert M. LARSEN.
On the evening of June 30, 1982 Investigator MONTEEN was invited
to the Jockey Club by Robert M. LARSEN and at that time given a
tour of the premises including the condominiums, the office
building, hotel, restaurant and bar facilities, the shopping
center, tennis facilities, marina and the security of the entire
facility. The clientele of the Jockey Club of Miami, Florida
are well -known and socially elite. These readily recognizable
personalities seek a certain amount of privacy and security in the
atmosphere of their economic strata. The Jockey Club provides a
comfortable atmosphere for these clients. The Jockey Club is a
secure facility consisting of the aforementioned office building
and hotel, condominiums and other amenities. A guarded gate and
security force maintains the privacy of the club. A thorough
examination of the credentials of each"and every person who
approached the gate was conducted during the time that MONTEEN
observed the area. No one appeared to enter simply by driving up
and being recognized.
Thia external facade has created an aura of mystique to the
general population of Miami and likewise to State and local law
enforcement officials. Being suspicious of the activities within
the club and not having ready access to the premises for obaerva-
Lion has created.this air.
On the evening of June 30,,Investigator MONTEEN not only toured
the facility but had access to the - employees:, members, and others
on the premises and did have an opportunity to speak to Michael
R FOLEY, Vice- President of Air Courier Dispatch Incorporated,
another business concern of Robert LARSEN. FOLEY indicated that
he was very satisfied to be a member of LARSEN's employ as
LARSEN treated his employees fairly and generously and as well
pointed out that LARSEN had a benevolent attitude toward the
public, having on one occasion spent $40,ODO.00 on Christmas
gifts for underprivileged people in Minneapolis, Minnesota and
having these anonymously delivered by Air Courier Dispatch Vans.
MONTEEN spoke with others who told of other acts of benvolence
on the part of LARSEN and indicated that they enjoyed his
company and his employment. LARSEN has established himself as a
developer, owning numerous shopping centers as well as the Jockey
Club and other hotels, the Air Courier Dispatch, Colorado ranch
lands and other diverse investments.
i
Licenses to be approved by the City Council on July 12, 1982 4
CIGARETTE LICENSE
Interstate United 1091 Pierce Butler Rte.
Ault Inc. 1600 Freeway Blvd.
City Clerk f�
GARBAGE AND REFUSE COLLECTION LICENSE T
Bautch Disposal Service 10264 Xyli'te St. N.E.
Bergstrom Trucking 6509 76th Aveuk N.'
Big Garbonzo 8037 6th St. N.E.
Block Sanitation 6741 79th Aveuk N.
Brooklyn Disposal, Inc. 7959 191st In. N.W.
Browning- Ferris Ind. 9813 Flying Cloud Dr.
Klein Sanitation Co. 10690 100th Ave. N.
L & N Disposal 3417 85th Ave. N.
MCS Refuse, Inc. 10050 Naples St. N.E.
Metro Refuse 8168 W. 125th St.
Shobe and Sons 3621 85th Ave. N.
Woodlake Sanitary Service 4000 Hamel Rd.
Sanitarian
ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
St, Alphonsus Catholic Church 7025 Halifax Ave, N.
Sanitarian
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS LICENSE
Nielsen Sheet Metal, Inc. 6324 Lakeland Ave. N.
Build'ng ° Official
j
NONPERISHABLE: VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
interstate United Corp. 1091 Pierce Butler Rte.
Ault, Inc. 1600 Reeeway Blvd.
Royal Crown Beverage Co.. P.O. Box 43466
Car X Muffler Shop 6810 Brooklyn Blvd.
Humboldt Square Cleaners 69th and Humboldt
Sanitarian
PERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
Interstate United Corp. 1091 Pierce Butler Rte.
Ault, Inc. 1600 Freeway Blvd.
Sanitarian V
TEMPORARY ON -SALE BEER LICENSE
St. Alphonsus Catholic Church 7025 Halifax Ave. N. & lzt�
City Clerk
Minnesota
John B. BrandE ¢
District 61A {;�, ,�"a7 Hausa of
Hennepin County R ep re sentative s
tt
Health and Welfare a
L
and Urban Affairs Harry A. Sieben, Jr.,Speaker
Transportation July 8, 1982
MEETING NOTICE
TO: Joint Legislative Commission on Metropolitan Governance
g P
FROM: Chairman, Representative John Brandl
DATE: Tuesday, July 20, 1982
LOCATION: Brooklyn Center City Council Chambers
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
"- Brooklyn.Center,- Minnesota
The Joint Legislative Commission on Metropolitan Governance
will hold a meeting on Tuesday, July 20 at the Brooklyn
Center City Council Chambers at 7:00 P.M.
We will hear testimony from interested citizens and organizations
-� regarding thoughts and concerns about regional government in
the metropolitan area and views on the Metropolitan Council.
- - i
Anyone wishing. to testify should call Karen James at 296 -4279 s
so that your name can be placed on the agenda. Please limit
comments to 5 -10 minutes so that all those wishing to testify
can be accommodated.
If you have any questions, please call Karen James at 296 -•4279
or Beverly Zaine at 296 -4837.
Q)
Q) a ,
a
• 3 �
r
69 ,
Brooklyn
Center
City Hall s