Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2003 10-30 PCP
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER OCTOBER 30, 2003 STUDY SESSION 1. Call to Order: 7:30 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes - September 25, 2003 4. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 5. DLR Group 2003 -019 Request for Planned Unit Development Amendmenet to build an approximate 27,000 sq. ft. office /industrial building for Global Industries on a 2.3 acre parcel of land located at the northwest corner of Freeway Boulevard and Shingle Creek Parkway. 6. Other Business 7. Adjournment • Application Filed on 10 -02 -03 . City Council Action Should Be Taken By 12 -01 -03 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2003 -019 Applicant: DLR Group Location: Northwest Corner of Freeway Boulevard and Shingle Creek Parkway Request: Planned Unit Development Amendment The applicant, Matthew Johnson on behalf of DLR Group, is seeking an amendment to the Planned Unit Development approval for this area to build an approximate 27,000 sq. ft. office /industrial building for Global Industries on a 2.3 acre parcel of land legally described as Tract B, RLS 1690, located at the northwest quadrant of Freeway Boulevard and Shingle Creek Parkway. The property is zoned PUD/I -1 (Planned Unit Development/Industrial Park) and is bounded on the north b Parkway Circle a private access roadway serving various developments Y Y � p Y g P to the north and west of this site; on the east by Shingle Creek Parkway with an industrial building on the opposite side of the street; on the south by Freeway Boulevard, with C -2 zoned property containing Chi Chi's Restaurant on the opposite side of the street; and on the west by the Americlnn Hotel. This site is the same site for which the City Council approved a PUD rezoning and development • plan for a Country Harvest Buffet Restaurant (which was never built) under Planning Commission Application No. 94014 on November 28, 1994. This site, with the Country Harvest Buffet development plan, was also acknowledged in a City initiated PUD/I -1 rezoning of a larger area including this property and surrounding property under Planning Commission Application No. 95009 which was approved by the City Council on July 10, 1995. On November 25, 1996, the City Council approved Planning Commission Application No. 96020 which was a request for a Planned Unit Development amendment for a four story AmericInn on the westerly portion of a 4.12 acre parcel which contained the site currently under consideration. This 4.12 acre site was later replatted to create two tracts, one for the Americlnn (Tract A, RLS 1690), the other a site for future development (Tract B, RLS 1690) containing a storm water management basin serving the immediate area. A condition of the approval of the PUD under Application No 96020 was that the area for future development was subject to an amendment to the Planned Unit Development and that the City would not allow this area to be developed as a fast food/convenience food restaurant or a gasoline service station. The applicant's proposal for the 27,000 Global Industries office /industrial building is the amendment being sought to finalize development in this PUD. Global is a wholesale furniture distribution operation with a showroom and office component. As the Commission is aware, the PUD process involves a rezoning of land to the PUD designation followed by an Alpha numeric designation of the underlying zoning district. This 10 -30 -03 Page 1 underlying zoning district provides the regulations governing uses and structures within the Planned Unit Development. The rules and regulations governing that district (in this case I -1) • would apply to the development proposal unless the City were to determine that another standard or use would be appropriate given mitigating circumstances that are offset by the plans submitted by the developer. One of the purposes of the PUD district is to give the City Council the needed flexibility in addressing development and redevelopment problems. Regulations governing uses and structures may be modified by conditions ultimately imposed by the City Council on the development plans. The PUD process involves a rezoning of land and, therefore, is subject to meeting the City's Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines that are contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. Also, proposals must be consistent with Section 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, which addresses Planned Unit Developments. Attached for the Commission's review are copies of Section of 35 -208 and 35- 355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. The rezoning of the property to the Planned Unit Development designation was accomplished with the November 27, 1994 approval for the Country Harvest Buffet Restaurant and the July 10, 1995 Planned Unit Development approval that accommodated appropriate common parking areas for the properties located in this general area. The approval of the AmericInn development was an amendment to the previously approved PUD proposals. The applicant in this case is not seeking any modifications in terms of the rules governing uses and structures in the underlying I -1 zoning district. The proposed office /industrial building for a wholesale furniture operation is considered a permitted use in the I -1 zoning district. As will be shown in the subsequent review of the development plan, no requests for modifications for such things as building setbacks, is parking requirements, landscape and other standard requirements for developments are being sought by the applicant in this case. Findings as to the appropriateness of such a development consistent with the I -1 underlying zoning designation have been made generally for the parcel of land under consideration. Approval of the development plan, however, should acknowledge compatibility with the Policy and Review Guidelines of Section 35 -208 and the provisions of Section 35 -355 of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant -has submitted written comments as to how they believe their proposal meets the guidelines established in Section 35 -208. This letter is attached for the Commission's review. The applicant indicates that he believes the proposed project can be considered a public benefit by bringing a positive exposure of an international company to the City of Brooklyn Center. He adds that the proposal is compatible with surrounding land use classifications and that the development is financially sound and will provide greater employment diversity to the community. The development plan will bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for this particular zoning district and comply with the applicable regulations. The staff believes that the proposed use of the property will be, as shown later in the report, consistent and compatible with the immediate area surrounding the property as well as those in the general vicinity. The proposal appears to be a good use of the property in the context of 10 -30 -03 • Page 2 overall development in this area and will be a good long range use and can be considered to be in • the best interests of the community. STTF. AND RT TTT .T)TNCT PT .AN PROPOSAL . The proposal, calls for an approximate 27,000 sq. ft. office /industrial building for Global Industries which is a wholesale furniture distribution use. The building will contain a showroom and office component but will be primarily a warehousing and storage facility. The building will be located in the approximate center of the 2.3 acre site immediately east of the AmericInn. The building has a curved footprint following the contour of Shingle Creek Parkway by maintaining at least a 50 ft. building setback from the street right of way line. AC.CE.SS/PARKTNCT Access to the property is gained via shared accesses along Freeway Boulevard and Parkway Circle. The shared accesses are with the AmericInn and were established at the time that development was approved. No direct access from Shingle Creek Parkway will be granted to this site. The access from Freeway Boulevard will require vehicles to enter the Americhm site before accessing the Global Industry property. The access to the north is divided by the property line separating the two sites. Appropriate cross access and parking agreements were established with the development of the AmericInn, however, the developer should assure that these documents have been properly filed. • Parking for the proposed building will be on the north and west sides. Parking calculations indicate 6,747 sq. ft. of office space and 20,091 sq. ft. of industrial space. At one parking space per 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area of office, 34 parking spaces are required; at one space per 800 sq. ft. of gross floor area for the industrial/warehouse component, 25 parking spaces are required for a total of 59 spaces. A loading area will be provided at the northwest corner of the site where four loading docks are proposed. It is recommended that a masonry wall be extended along the north side of the loading area to screen this area from abutting uses to the north. DR A TNA GTE. /CTR ADTNCT/T TTR .TTTF.S The applicant has provided grading, drainage and utility plans which have been reviewed by the Director of Public Works /City Engineer. The Commission's attention is directed to his October 6, 2003 memorandum regarding his review of the plans. He notes that based on the survey data submitted, it appears that the majority of an existing water main was constructed outside of an existing utility easement. The water main will be relocated within the easement as proposed by the development plans. He indicates also that storm water run off from this site, the AmericInn and the Minnesota State High School League offices currently flows to an existing storm water management basin located at the southeast corner of the site. This basin was originally planned during preparation of storm water management feasibility for this Shingle Creek Business Center in 1986. He makes comments as to the fact that the applicant will need to revise plans to show the existing 27 inch diameter storm sewer extending across the southern portion of the site; field • 10 -30 -03 Page 3 locate the existing catch basin structure near the westerly property line, verify structural condition and replace casting as necessary; revise the drainage plan to show the invert, pipe size, pipe grade • and material of the existing outlet pipe for the detention basin; install rip rap material at the inlet and outlet pipes of the detention basin; provide an earthwork calculation showing that the proposed grading within the drainage easement will not result in a net decrease in the storage capacity of the storm water detention facility; and provide storm water drainage calculations to the Engineering Department for review. He also notes that an erosion control plan shall be developed for the proposed site work; an NPDES construction site erosion control permit must be obtained from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; and the grading plan shall be revised to show side slopes along the detention facility at a maximum of 1 to 4 or flatter. LANDSCAPTNC"T The applicant has submitted a landscape plan in response to the landscape point system used to evaluate such plans. They have not provided particular species of landscaping but rather provided points based on shade trees, coniferous trees, and decorative trees. We assume there will be a variety of each of the types of trees provided. Their plan is to provide nine shade trees, primarily along the Shingle Creek green strip and Freeway Boulevard green strip. Thirteen coniferous trees will be interspersed amongst the shade trees in these same areas. Twenty decorative trees are proposed with 17 being located along the west side of the building and three at the northeast corner of the site. The amount of landscape points proposed for the property is 198, which is what is required for an office /industrial use with over 25 percent office in the industrial zone. The point system they have used is based on 2.25 acres, however, the topographical survey submitted with the plans indicates that the total acreage for this site is • 2.3030 acres. This would require a slight increase in the number of points required to 201. There should not be a problem adjusting the landscape plan to rectify this inconsistency. RT M .DTNC'T The building elevations show two options for the exterior building treatment. Both options show two types of masonry finish and metal wall panels. In Option One there would be a smooth masonry finish with a half inch recess finish. Option Two has a raked finish and a broomed finish. The various finishes provide different looks to the building, both of which appear to be attractive. Hopefully a decision can be made as to which exterior treatment the applicant proposes to provide. I JCCTTHTTNC'T/TR A SH The applicant has submitted a lighting plan indicating the locations for various exterior lighting. Seven light poles will be installed to service the area, five of which will be basically along the property line separating the AmericInn with this site. Two will be located in the north parking lot. Also, building mounted lights will be provided around the exterior of the building. The type of fixture for the parking lot lights is not shown but should be a cut off type, which will direct light downward on the site and should not create glare. The lighting plan indicates the foot candles at various locations which are consistent with the ordinance requirements. 10 -30 -03 Page 4 • . The site plan does not indicate a trash enclosure area, and it is my understanding that trash will be located within the loading dock area inside the building. PR OCFD1 TR F. As pointed out previously, this proposal is an amendment to the Planned Unit Development proposal for this area. As such, it is required to follow the procedures contained in Section 35- 355 regarding Planned Unit Developments. This requires a public hearing which has been scheduled. Notices have been sent and a notice has been published in the Brooklyn Center Sun/Post. Normally with rezonings or Planned Unit Developments, the affected Neighborhood Advisory Group is contacted to seek review and comment. The Planning Commission itself serves as the Advisory Group for development proposals within the industrial park area. Therefore, no notices beyond that required for the public hearing have been sent. All in all, we believe the plans to be in order and, therefore, would recommend approval of the amendment for the development of the Global Industries office /industrial building. Approval of this application should acknowledge findings, considerations and conditions that are comparable to those made in previous City Council resolutions. A draft Planning Commission resolution is offered for the Commission's consideration. This resolution outlines the Commission's consideration of this matter and also recommended considerations and conditions for approval. • • 10 -30 -03 Page 5 '•� IBM mm IR matmamulat son use wag �� Rs >•I�a Mist /s11i �t !i �,�,�; Ron I.>v ,{� 111 { i i� i i►f a ©'1i :: : ■i`� ./ as XA ..� :,�� Cl is i= tit- ran Asa �� �■I fit[ Mir WIG W� yaw mm f VA _w s tl� m1w tt[ltt ` ' ' •. tn'{ >•C-A N : « VOW alt P � 1�ti4�i► iii City of Brooklyn Center Section 35 -208 REZONING EVALUATION POLICY AND REVIEW GUIDELINES. 1. Purpose The City Council finds that effective maintenance of the comprehensive planning and land use classifications is enhanced through uniform and equitable evaluation of periodic proposed changes to this Zoning Ordinance; and for this purpose, by the adoption of Resolution No. 77 -167, the City Council has established a rezoning evaluation policy and review guidelines. 2. Polic It is the policy of the City that: A) Zoning classifications must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and, B) Rezoning proposals will not constitute "spot zoning ", defined as a zoning decision, which discriminates in favor of a particular landowner and does not relate to the Comprehensive Plan or -to accepted planning principles. 3. Procedure , Each rezoning proposal will be considered on its merits, measured against the above policy and against these guidelines, which may be weighed collectively or individually as deemed by the City. 4. Guidelines A. Is there a clear and public need or benefit? • B. Is the proposed zoning consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classifications? C. Can all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district be contemplated for development of the subject property? D. Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the subject property was zoned? E. In the case of City - initiated rezoning proposals, is there a broad public purpose evident? F. Will the subject property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed zoning districts? G. Is the subject property generally unsuited for uses`p&mitted'in the present zoning district, with . respect to size, configuration, topography or location? H. Will the rezoning result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by: 1) Comprehensive planning; 2) The lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or, 3) The best interests of the community? I. Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an individual parcel? Section 35 -208 Revised 3 -01 1 Section 35 -341. 0-2 PUBLIC PRIVATE PE • UB C AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT. STRI T. 1. Permitted Uses a. Public parks, playgrounds, athletic fields and other recreational uses of a noncommercial nature. b. Commercial recreational facilities of a semi -open nature such as golf courses and golf driving ranges. c. Accessory uses incidental to the foregoing principal uses when located on the same property with the use to which it is accessory but not including any business or industrial uses. Such accessory uses to include but not be restricted to the following: 1. Off- street parking: 2. Public recreational buildings and parks, playgrounds and athletic fields. 3. Signs as permitted in the Brooklyn Center Sign Ordinance. Section 35 -355. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. • Subdivision 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is to promote flexibility in land development and redevelopment, preserve aesthetically significant and environmentally sensitive site features, conserve energy and ensure a high quality of design. Subdivision 2. Classification of PUD Districts; Permitted Uses; Applicable Regulations. a. Upon rezoning for a PUD, the district shall be designated by the letters "PUD" followed by the alphanumeric designation of the underlying zoning district which may be either the prior zoning classification or a new classification. In cases of mixed use PUDs, the City Council shall, whenever reasonably practicable, specify underlying zoning classifications for the various parts of the PUD. When it is not reasonably practicable to so specify underlying zoning classifications, the Council may rezone the district, or any part thereof, to "PUD- MIXED." b. Regulations governing uses and structures in PUDs shall be the same as those governing City of Brooklyn Center 35 -45 City Ordinance • the underlying zoning district subject to the following: • 1. Regulations may be modified expressly b conditions imposed b the Council at � Y p Y Y p Y the time of rezoning to PUD. 2. Regulations are modified by implication only to the extent necessary to comply with the development plan of the PUD. 3. In the case of districts rezoned to PUD- MIXED, the Council shall specify regulations applicable to uses and structures in various parts of the district. c. For purposes of determining applicable regulations for uses or structures on land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the PUD district which depend on the zoning of the PUD district, the underlying zoning classification of PUD districts shall be deemed to be the zonin g classification of the district. In the case of a district zoned PUD -MIXED the underlying zoning classification shall be deemed to be the classification which allows as a permitted use any use which is permitted in the PUD district and which results in the most restrictive regulation of adjacent or nearby properties. Subdivision 3. Development Standards. a. A PUD shall have a minimum area of one acre, excluding land included within the floodway or flood fringe overlay districts and excluding existing rights -of -way, unless • the City finds that at least one of the following conditions exists: 1. There are unusual physical features of the property or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a PUD will conserve a physical or terrain feature of importance to the neighborhood or community; 2. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public right -of -way from property which previously was developed as a PUD and the new PUD will be perceived as and function as an extension of that previously approved development; or 3. The property is located in a transitional area between different land uses and the development will be used as a buffer between the uses. b. Within a PUD, overall density for residential developments shall be consistent with Section 35 -400 of this ordinance. Individual buildings or lots within a PUD may exceed these standards, provided that density for the entire PUD does not exceed the permitted standards. • City of Brooklyn Center 35 -46 City Ordinance • c. Setbacks, buffers and greenstrips within a PUD shall be consistent with Section 35 -400 to 35 -414 and Section 35 -700 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted with the addition of a screening treatment or other mitigative measures, d. Parking provided for uses within a PUD shall be consistent with the parking requirements contained in Section 35 -704 of this ordinance unless the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted on the grounds of the complementarity of peak parking demands by the uses within the PUD. The City may require execution of a restrictive covenant limiting future use of the property to those uses which will continue this parking complementarity, or which are otherwise approved by the City. Subdivision 4. General Standards. a. The City may allow more than one principal building to be constructed on each platted lot within a PUD. b. A PUD which involves only one land use or a single housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the purposes and objectives of this section. c. A PUD may only contain uses consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. • d. All property to be included within a PUD shall be under unified ownership or control or subject to such legal restrictions or covenants as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the approved development plan and site plan. e. The uniqueness of each PUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities and the approval of land subdivision may be subject to modifications from the City Ordinances generally governing them. The City Council may, therefore approve streets utilities public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements where it is found that such are not required in the interests of the residents or of the City, except that these subdivisions and lans must be in conformance with all watershed state and federal p � al storm water, erosion control, and wetlands requirements. Subdivision 5. Application and Review. a. Implementation of a PUD shall be controlled by the development plan. The development plan may be approved or disapproved by the City Council after evaluation City of Brooklyn Center 35 -47 City Ordinance • by the Planning Commission. • Submission of the development plan shall be made to the Director of Planning and Inspection on such forms and accompanied by such information and documentation as I the City may deem necessary or convenient, but shall include at a minimum the following: 1. Street and utility locations and sizes; 2. A drainage plan, including location and size of pipes and water storage areas; 3. A grading plan, including temporary and permanent erosion control provisions; 4. A landscape plan; 5. A lighting plan; 6. A plan for timing and phasing of the development; 7. Covenants or other restrictions proposed for the regulation of the development; 8. A site plan showing the location of all structures and parking areas; • 9. Building renderings or elevation drawings of all sides of all buildings to be constructed in at least the first phase of development; and 10. Proposed underlying zoning classification or classifications. Such information may be in a preliminary form, but shall be sufficiently complete and accurate to allow an evaluation of the development by the City. b. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the development plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be published in the official newspaper and actual notice shall be mailed to the applicant and adjacent property owners as required by Section 35- 210 of this ordinance. The Planning Commission shall review the development plan and make such recommendations as it deems appropriate regarding the plan within the time limits established by Section 35 -210 of this ordinance. c. Following receipt of the recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council shall hold such hearing as it deems appropriate regarding the matter. The City Council shall act upon the development plan within the time limits established by Section 35 -210 of this ordinance. City of Brooklyn Center 35 -48 City Ordinance Approval of the development plan shall constitute rezoning of the property to PUD and • conceptual approval of the elements of the plan. In addition to the guidelines provided in Section 35 -208 of this ordinance, the City Council shall base its actions on the rezoning upon the following criteria: 1. Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes and intent of this section 2. Consistency of the plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; 3. The impact of the plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located; and 4. The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping. The City Council may attach such conditions to its approval as it may determine to be necessary to better accomplish the purposes of the PUD district. d. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall seek plan approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 of this ordinance. In addition to the information specifically required by Section 35 -230, the developer shall submit such information as may be deemed necessary or convenient by the City to review the consistency of the proposed • development with the approved development plan. The plan submitted for approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 shall be in substantial compliance with the approved development plan. Substantial compliance shall mean that buildings, parking areas and roads are in essentially the same location as previously approved; the number of dwelling units, if any, has not increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; the floor area of nonresidential areas has not been increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; no building has been increased in the number of floors; open space has not been decreased or altered from its original design or use, and lot coverage of any individual building has not been increased or decreased by more than 10 percent. e. Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall execute a development agreement in a form satisfactory to the City. f. Applicants may combine development plan approval with the plan approval required by Section 35 -230 by submitting all information required for both simultaneously. g. After approval of the development plan and the plan approval required by Section 35- 230, nothing shall be constructed on the site and no building permits shall be issued City of Brooklyn Center 35 -49 City Ordinance • DLR Group Architecture Engineering Planning Interiors September 30 2003 9521 west 78th street p Minneapolis, MN 55344 -3853 tel 952/941 -8950 fax 952/941 -7965 City of Brooklyn Center minneapolis @dlrgroup.com 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway www.dlrgroup.com Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 Attn: Ronald Warren Re: Global North, Brooklyn Center, MN 4003120 -00 Dear: Mr. Warren i We are submitting the Global North project, located at the NW corner of the Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Blvd intersection, for PUD Amendment to be reviewed at the regular planning commission meeting scheduled for November 13, 2003. This letter is being written in response to the guidelines establishes in Section 35 -208, "Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines ". - A. This proposed project does serve as a public benefit due to the fact that the project is being developed by an International Company and will bring further positive exposure to the City of Brooklyn Center. In addition, of al I of the projects that have been proposed for this site, this project is one of the few that has not been a restaurant of gas station. • B. The existing zoning and Planned Unit Development is compatible with the surrounding land use classification. The project consists of approximately 6,000 SF of office space and 21,000 SF of warehouse space with four truck docks and a drive -in dock. None of the truck trailers will be parked overnight. C. The current zoning or PUD districting has not impeded the project. The only issue at large is the cost of soil amendments to bring the building pad up to acceptable building code driven standards. The current zoning/PUD has provided a financial environment that will help make this project feasible. D. We are currently unaware of any substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the property was zoned as a PUD. E. The current PUD zoning will allow Global to develop the site with an industry that is financially sound and provide greater employment diversity to the community, beyond just restaurant and service stations. F. The project will respond to all ordinance driven restrictions such as, but not limited to, the screening of roof top mechanical equipment so they can not be seen from the ground, signage will conform to current ordinances, building materials are precast, window curtain wall and metal wall panels of colors that will blend with the surrounding buildings, landscaping will include a sprinkler system and trees, building setbacks to help create a landscape buffer, and 59 additional parking stalls will be provided that will also meet the current ordinances. This project will have no problem responding to any of the other published ordinances that are in place. G. This project is perfectly suited to the current PUD zoning that is in place for this site. H. This amendment to the current PUD zoning is in the best interests of the community due to the fact that it is occurring within a current PUD and is able to respond to many of the • Minneapolis Chicago Colorado Springs Des Moines Farmington Honolulu Kansas City Milwaukee Omaha Orlando Overland Park Philadelphia Phoenix Portland Sacramento Seattle Tampa Ronald Warren September 30, 2003 Page 2 purposes of a PUD such as development of a currently empty site, a building that will blend with the surrounds as well as have its own architectural identity and bring further • character to the neighborhood, the existing retention pond will be improved for better water retention and sedimentation of storm water drainage. These are many of the goals that a PUD is founded on. L This project does demonstrate merit beyond the interest of the current owner due to the fact that the building and site are being developed to maintain good visibility of the adjacent hotel from the intersection of shingle creek and freeway blvd (a responsive neighbor). The retention pond is being cleaned up, de- brushed, and the storm water inlets are being improved for better storm water management, trees and landscaping are being incorporated to further enhance the site from the adjacent roadway as well as create a more pleasant curb appeal. In Addition, the external design of the building is sensitive to the large box image, which is often projected by a warehouse, by developing the articulation of the facade to reduce the visual scale as well as create a playful, yet subtle, mosaic image. We are excited about this project and the opportunities that the City of Brooklyn Center has made possible to date. This site will provide Global with easy access to the surrounding metropolitan area and the clients it serves, as well as providing the City with more economic diversity. If we can clarify any other outstanding issues please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, DLR Group Matthew C. Johnson • Principal in the Firm CC: Jon Soll (Global; fax, 856.996.5684) • DLR Group Minneapolis, Minnesota tel 952/941 -8950 fax 952/941 -7965 • XBR MEMORANDUM ox DATE: October 6, 2003 TO: Ron Warren, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Todd Blomstrom, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Global North — 2050 Freeway Blvd Planning Commission Application 2003 -019 The Public Works Department reviewed the following plans sheets as submitted for review under Planning Commission Application 2003 -019 for the Global North facility. • Topographic Survey, Sheet CO. 1, dated September 26, 2003 • Site Demolition Plan, Sheet C1.1, dated September 25, 2003 • Site Layout Plan, Sheet C2.1, dated September 29, 3004 • Site Grading and Drainage Plan, Sheet C3.1, dated September 29, 2003 • Site Mechanical Utilities Plan, Sheet C4.1, dated September 29, 2003 • The preliminary site plans appear to be in order and approval is recommended subject to at least the following conditions: Water Supply and Sanitary Sewer An 8 -inch diameter water main currently extends across the northern portion of the site. This main was installed during development of the AmericInn site to provide a loop between the 12- inch diameter water main within Freeway Boulevard and the 10 -inch diameter water main within Shingle Creek Parkway. An 8 -inch diameter sanitary sewer service is stubbed to the southwest corner of the ro ert to serve the proposed building. p p Y . p p g 1. Based on the survey data submitted, it appears that a majority of the existing water main within the site was constructed outside of the utility easement. The water main will be relocated back within the easement as proposed by the site development plans. 2. The location of the proposed gate valve shall be shifted approximately 12 feet toward the western property line. The existing tee and unutilized service stub shall be removed to avoid future maintenance problems. 3. The applicant shall coordinate water shut -down for valve installation with the Water Utility and owners of Americlnn. 4. The applicant shall verify that the existing sanitary structure located in the southwest . corner of the property is structurally sound and watertight. The casting elevation shall be adjusted to surface grade prior to connecting the sewer service to the building plumbing. GADepts\Public Works\Engineering\Development & Planning \Global North \Site Plan reviewl0 -6.doc 5. A utility connection permit will be required for the proposed water main. Water and sanitary sewer connection charges will be due at the time of permit application. 6. The proposed site plan shall be subject to the approval of the City Fire Chief, including hydrant spacing requirements and any other requirements of the Fire Department. Storm Water Drainage Storm water runoff from the Global North, AmericInn and Minnesota State High School League properties currently flows to the existing storm water management basin located at Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Blvd. The basin was originally planned during preparation of a storm water management feasibility study for Shingle Creek Business Center in 1986. The applicant will need to complete the following items. 1. Revise plans to show the existing 27 -inch diameter storm sewer extending across the southern portion of the site to the detention basin. 2. Field locate the existing catch basin structure near the western property line, verify structural condition, and replace casting as necessary. 3. Revise the drainage plan to show the invert, pipe size, pipe grade and material of the existing outlet pipe for the detention basin. 4. Install rip rap material at the inlet and outlet pipes of the detention basin. 5. Provide an earthwork calculation showing that the proposed grading within the drainage easement will not result in a net decrease in the storage capacity of the storm water detention facility. 6. Provide HyrdoCad (or equivalent) storm water drainage calculations to the Engineering Division for review. The existing detention basin shall be expanded as necessary to maintain a high water level of 845.5. for the 5 -year, 24 -hour storm event. Site Layout and Grading 1. An erosion control plan shall be developed for the proposed site work. Erosion control measures shall be installed prior to starting site grading operations. 2. An NPDES construction site erosion control permit must be obtained from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 3. The grading plan shall be revised to provide side slopes along the detention facility at a maximum of 1:4 or flatter. • G:\Depts\Public WorksTngineering\Development& Planning \Global North\Site`Plan reviewl0 -6.doc .Z LLI I ra o GLOBAL NORTH ow 5i w 0 2050 FREEWAY BLVD BROOKLYN CENTER, MN GENERAL STRUCTURAL Tn, moECOP ORA^Ras xores I 55430 �= s �EaaAx�NRRE ^A E s ; 111�srLE"EL. A, 9�3 �w 1LEVEL AREAS _ ��• Qi M6 RAN. FlMT LEVEL AREAA ..�! I CIVIL 5 :2 RA,"xeRAx iRSTLE EI Sl, STRUCNIRAI OETARE - '��._ -✓ alla wo � .. ` —. Cot iOPoORMNC a,xuEY Ns STRURYRU OETNS - - � �* - 1 OWNER .1 aTRUCNRU l)ETAM19 a.+slh L"raurvuN u: smucrww. oErARa ' mot \ \ ' ✓'°°� i Q 1 ATE GRACII1f AHD eRMlAGE p.1 911E IAECI,IVIItu URITES PLW .., I , GLOBAL INDUSTRIES tl.1 L o E— MECHANICAL 17 WEST STOW ROAD ARCHITECTURAL � A A ; ; ( r r -�'' P.O. BOX 562 vi, awExrATroxacooEPw� N w., IEOOwEau 9CNEWLF9 ANOOETNS _ A„ aop,aAN. L MARLTON, NJ 08053 Al ROORPWLAREA■ ROO4iE.SH9CEDLE PLUMBING N.1 ROOF 0.AN IAx.NEAA PHONE: 856.596.3390 N.1 VIUL eEC1WN9 %3 0.UM &x9 PLAN NEA a FAX: 856.596.5664 RENDERING IS FOR CONCEPT ONLY CONTACT: JON SOLL FIRE PROTECTION SKETCH i ^E PROrECna.PUN�AREA AND MAY NOT BE ACCURATE FP, 3 iKE PRMECTgN PLAH.AREA: ARCHITECT /ENGINEER ELECTRICAL . Ecmcu sRE aAN t .:, „:. EI i LMN^NO PLAN AREAA � � .ar6 O �NV"fa"9N 1 DLR GROUP E,] y N9P Ax. REA9 ti s g Q, PoVA:R 0.ANAREAA � ( �e „ 9521 WEST 78TH STREET Q: Po ERP AN.AREA9 d '-” ,(. j U) BPECVL SVSTFN9 RAN ARE.xA , /["� e MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55344.3853 PHONE: 952.941.8950 _ FAX: 952.941.7965 x s o z CONTACT: NATHAN MILLER n Nk � ,�� -„ � � ,: •: 4 LL J GENERAL CONTRACTOR i o Q x m ANDERSON BUILDERS J 4208 PARK GLEN ROAD ST. LOUIS LOUIS PARK MN 55416 REGIONAL MAP MAPOLIF£.T ` OM PHONE: 952.927.5400 FAX: 952.927.5444 c . CONTACT: GREG ANDERSON �x '"'`'" E ,a' C7 ' t{ t.m y a' c.•+. ❑. s - I LOCAL L M /` P MAPOUEST COM o ,....., ,... H1bON W90 I 1N3tNdO13A34 w� fl V''a dnoa a i NOIS30 SNOUVIA3888V aNV SIOBINAS Z E #siit.'!1'se3 z €fill � 1it€ saQ$Efslt EiBf �� €!$ ° =$�a !_= E a Q ltfs i 3i Ip., i �� {if� ° ° °E ( ( I� [� E �� � f! ��l�isss$� 1 {11 a 1i� E 4 �� $° ��s4 !!i E I E{ s•. §$ E 1i$ 1991 { �$i ff °l { �� daa =.i.aii6ltti;!! € 8 1�f 31 itI!l frSflilEal E.lt { i11yElI { ,ffs�a�Eslt { {�I1$d,111! !fs {���t�t$1�I tip$ {f§ .4 4 ®... .�aa .F .'ra a.0 n. 9 ®o E ® ®lWRAP`!Q €WFi�'m�E - et ®l.e° • v•o 4 i 4 "g° � I ?5 •�'ae l 8b444'�tea ®! ®ff•ff�ff ®® �Of m ® ® ®.a lfff ®ff ��9 �� 11 l� 1191••[![ } I�1 m1 EiMil {{ gf� R 11 1E El 1ll;@ 11EaEfaES E° {I. siY 1 { {1111 § §{ � E $li !§ � , !d$ m m m =t SIf.SIFs 61`111 w5 li ➢{ ill [ I E$ $ERl t�lfl�la$mEiladfai :. 11:. { {: 17ElFEEFF9Ef f ff$�$� §e §p➢F$if$ lta 1f1111$Ilffl i$fti[t w ���•I�I� ° ® "r ( 11fifi1((( {ll�d� =Pa�E® ®. at a ® ® ®oaiShcbtSsce000004011B® ®g4+ �m ®® ?oe�eg��e ®ft s 6$' q B i II e L $ d € =ff ;liBi$ if iRt 91 f6! !sE 't E + t t t t ilsi @ a 9{ s s s 4! y 5 5 i 5 ➢55� ➢��y 5 ic!i{ ➢l 114 :f6 i ii11111$11$lf t$t 9Gr {,il 1 {1 F i j {{ Q 1 I tEi $ $ 9 1 1 11, 1 11,111 {$1 , 11 1111:1 i IIIIIII IIIIIIIIII III } igr laliaf$ I�11�111 { le Ills 111 li D��dBf)0 ®m ®�r�r�r�omo���ifiit¢j I`Illil ?I�III IIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIII �fil��l #llfllif�l�f �'�f�-flr�l -I�i� �fldd�f m $111E111l1 181 fill _ $ t1 f 1 $ fill, IfveftQp > I I I I { (� {{ E4 li ➢! 5 I� $! f i 99 CO E ! { i { E E E$ { E${ { 61 iiia$yllll is { { € { {4tf f i ff s 1 $ i .t : H IM, { if$ ss91 @{ml$I},mY l ! Y Iii } ➢E }i 11 of of il il lEE E €EE € tlEilli�$I { { {$$lo E 4sF€ Z {{ i, 5{1 1�1i $�1 ➢![i��dl {�� {I��l llill�i�39➢ l i �' 1.1.1' i" 1 I I i I I i I I I 1 1 I I I I) I l t I p ®pl I 11 ! f �! ! EEEEss €ieti i fififllfiiill+W 111fi11>•fi1 I l iiiY b w I � 1 � ��Ill;l;lllllil Illl�iilllll �IIII ' 1 l � ➢➢ }[ d I I lly {ya1EEEEt1 {){ } $ } f � � i $ ! i { 111 €i §111111 ➢mt ©�1fo � I s��� ...... f a qSO f t I { t tl 1 B s f 11tf {E {$$ ➢ lo a €�tQ���1 I; {{11 101 ill!liiffiii 111ilFE�filI W iHi ��ii3ll�i�4lll�li 1� !! �� o 0 0> a 11�fi,ii W a e 1E` Ifffllaffills Ill l iia { t 1l$ 1.11 Il�isii! I ➢ i ➢1i f�IIC� aEA Rssl ld y !r� {I i, dl4f y ilii _ aliltl EE l 1 ; € i'!$II I I s E$ =9� ! t Y %d it Edf $$ t�1 $ lil i I s � $fim E$11lBIiE 11 11111191111$ ii Eii$IE } $ tl! 1 al$ il lfi $i$iiiil$1$ldiilllfiif1f111ifi 1 f $!$I!$Ea f {$$i�1} {fiie I. l al lt[ �$ {ili '9 ►� Y Ci9 i }i1151[1 f1f } $f iia [a$i${f$$$1E$1� IIE {I$ !1 !$ {E A .[} lerfliotliiiE $E$iQ6.6e }a }t }.m4iaeE ..... Sol ... YR R..... RB➢ I. eidaS$} i y 4$ ii ddttt 1 999S ..in..$RU twiRRIM.SStfR ._: _ l.. Rr. .Rr$i$$w.rRRRYMRRRR. . €vmRfi.ttlddt . »rddrr9R9Gra$$$$.dr i If + I II E i 5! if { f � = al $ l � $ ee 11111 i ii 1 ii i3 i f f1f $ iA I � $11 116 �$1111$11$d119 i ll lil$93ii {$ill il�i�s § 1$�l 1 8 11 11 { 1$ {$ 1$ 11 {1�11$�I {tlel $i{ {1111!!$ I ll it Ill fy Pff�i{{ tff{ 1f1111 IEi flf�ll��s '�Ie1f if f•FCC. QQcc€ dinil a !! €Srdlatri[da9Q € §lSdda,ae7ssiy . n}E tiy tyyQ i�l iimil![ iit €tmiiii$mtaf[fa€iifttREEEti .. €}avEi[Y[n }.A : ui. m$ dttiddtl StE teee![[! lRee45 i.. RieelSEetEEteltEeetefcccthIC ! .! 1!l If 1! y ; �$$ $ l i,iyd1 { ",E QISt {{ j lii {l$f $tilt . Ellf € e t{ sl! $$ 111fY1$a3$E If t $! 4�� $� t N Fi fill H y y [ El Q 1t $ $ e een.eaae !E{ i y� r t lfsl 4gt #} $ 1 Q! ;fa x[ $1111 81 tl 111 I $$ 9� }t[e1 $ t1 11�1t1 11t 11111s111111c �fi1 11f111t { {11 {11111 � { l�i sE� is} Fill �IE { €lil ➢ ➢$ ➢!y } } ➢� € ➢Fis4`€i iif9iEl 1f1s 1$ ss1� 11ifi�ss� {i$l1$ t[I11�a�l IIE [1f�1[� §$ [11![$1$[[11111 € €1i Il f i �f {l1.li$11a1 _ ssdariyfate. c:€ a. 5$5 idiYttwt9stae.fdceCEdail6b$b ...rx }e[1lEeeCEE. Eta. Ce[ mei➢ iA Ee [Ee[EtCEtplfl,FEeeee!leee! }CE .. ai .Et .ffietdd...it §ii...ddtdrielt .. Y [ E4f+ EEEE ffdf : : : € € €[ :lma iEE $iE[Yiln w..m....ri,Yte.t i $ { f $ ➢9 i tl ie € I t i $} la 1 15 if $ if LLI ,1�a3$i4�' g11l1:i,1111� i�llfs139 �111s11i�E1 {1111�ta'$ 1�11lB9s11ii9$ssas 1{1 �1i11s�131�1 li11��1i1i 111�i1�1i1111E } lali;!1 �lii 11 X11 I { {$111s11t 1 u11fs 1111 ca I{ 1 11 11 i al I Q 5�. lE• Ktr }5:eti'ilKi.i51t.Kl.ilEEtSS +!! :I�toGR.Lit.tiSfn .. adibdde➢. E$ ded€ ra iifadifie. ASAaff fttE$ f E$ Ittl§ I tlsedi .a.s.itbatceaEaasafeaadic ... dE. mQ. uAtifieRAi .c..fidifftta6auEG,eJEEilifl I I F z z w g 2 c c? a W od o € w 0 ------------------- mwm, / i f d Paws .c I I � ,n. amue:, , >, ::�xir . c •, ' [vcR ., ,[PxvK 6 w[=, s..[ «[ C —. Tv a KP, E [t:.[ rt,. 1 P - ♦9999 I W 7. 33.34 Q ' 1 "`Ne'&29"N Q . co A v a __ ......... _ - �w 2 q t 9 0 8 FRiEWIIY _ � 17.1,Uv e _"tfV� • IY w R TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY C[w1u�E ea. �tK Q ROO WAY BLVD. BROOKLYN 0 ER, M 2 I LI IL J i • • • C2.1 SITE LAYOUT PLAN DLR Group GLOBAL NORTH wwren. 6rorwM1ro �a iwiw. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT J n J 0 0 �J DLR Group ,.. Ps. -1 kftf. L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT GLOBAL NORTH J i �1Ba rn C � W •z 0 z n O m D Z i x � r - i j i I DLR Group OP's ORIENTATION & CODE PLAN GLOBAL NORTH i mum •I m m - c/) F N # 0 1 m �.r DESIGN m V 1 lAl� �1Ba rn C � W •z 0 z n O m D Z i x � r - i j i I DLR Group OP's ORIENTATION & CODE PLAN GLOBAL NORTH i mum •I m m G) m z v Z 0 1 m DESIGN DEVELOPMENT • •I .T. �S +; Z a I I t I �I It I I I tl ..... _....� :1 .._.......... 1 , III I I, III ............ t I , r ' I 1 , - `111 I 1 III I � __- ttt ED 6D 16 DLR Group i,x:tum Fnynn�my ax 111 I11 A1.1 FLOOR PLAN - AREA -A GLOBAL NORTH m Q z 0 Z O 9 m cn DESIGN DEVELOPMENT m m t Z � I 16 DLR Group i,x:tum Fnynn�my ax 111 I11 A1.1 FLOOR PLAN - AREA -A GLOBAL NORTH m Q z 0 Z O 9 m cn DESIGN DEVELOPMENT I _ I D O O T cn Z ��0000�o�owou�� ��Igl�lll n m m c � 0 m < z . O L70" Z O m DLR Group Al GLOBAL NORTH B: ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE nESiGVENT FLOOR PLAN - DEVELOPM e� a. - z O m A4.1 ROOF PLAN r DESIGN R /^ DLR Group GLOBAL NORTH DEVELOPMENT i = ® - ®® - �4i vt 4 • C9 . _4 rilin A ik b �,X -MAIIIIIIIIIIIIIi a- MW _ _ ..• r4d r.71 iY Z Z W 7 7 7� m O - W W _ o o I d .J .M7 .. I I 00 DETAIL DETAIL DETAIL ~ Z n_ n C 1 / 1 DETAIL ^ DETAIL b.,�,. ..� a.+. .asTt4l DETAIL C� J rVy .,� a.... ,.., a .... W Q co p a -i 3 (D i a (wl DETAIL n DETAIL DETAIL n DETAIL i i f J t: 1 DETAIL DETAIL DETAIL DETAIL DETAIL + ... �. n ... DETAIL — I 1 � 1 " p ..Y�' III ti�a1 0 ..� -�--�' . --- I - - - -,I 111 .0 a ! _ — - -- ,1 - - - -_-_ -I i _ \ III a I j- - --�_i_ ' � 1 III ! 1 III 1 I ° I I 111 a i I _ 1 a 1 I 1f F 1 .. -1I C . Z � D O Z v T N 1 m r D T1 S1.1 DESIGN FOUNDATION PLAN, FIRST LEVEL - AREA A DL Group GLOBAL NORTH DEVELOPMENT �tlrYpuro EiglnasM1g RnMry YMb xerrc m. • J l r m m m O O m z m rn S1.1 DESIGN FOUNDATION PLAN, FIRST LEVEL - AREA A DL Group GLOBAL NORTH DEVELOPMENT �tlrYpuro EiglnasM1g RnMry YMb xerrc m. • J 10 �, 0 I " Y•r y r. I r' •- II I JJr M-f 1 1 1 111 � g I I I 1 _ 1 111 I �.� ♦1� — — — 1 it III 1 1 I I f I " a III 1 -- 1, 111 ' 1 1 I t 1 1 .. � 1 I I III I - I I 11 1 1 1 .. 1 111 __ II �1 1 lII I _I I I I I I 11 1 1 11 I 1 1 .I II 1 P 1 1 II II I I, 1 1 II 1 1.11 T I I 1 1 I r 111 V Z m CD DLR GCOU S2.1 FRAMING PLAN, FIRST LEVEL -AREA A DESIGN n GLOBAL NORTH DEVELOPMENT RrUawurs Enpneer:g Ran F ixng ' Inlews .rrt rn+c�xs•sm. i • 0 182 , - n Fn m m � m y w • z v r 113�fl Z � DLR Group i 1` I ,4111 1111 1 ' 1 1, 1 111 ll ,� _ 1 j 1 l j 111.1 NrT ( 1 S2.2 FRAMING PLAN, FIRST LEVEL -AREA B GLOBAL NORTH m m z 0 Z O 1 m DESIGN DEVELOPMENT Z SIPUC TVR At NOTES 10UN01TI0N NOTES Z �.w.. 'mow ... w _ `•,.E.. x.._ n o °°'° . r...,. r.aw w,,,wm.w .. °wm ax:nr•"' I CONT FTG S CHEDU LE a °«axwww .5;�., ww _� e � w.°..wwwww.wwaw r.a°fi�•.w «...... .wxa °«. _ .... _ wwwwwwaw. ww.• i .... � wa. ®rwP.I :w•� ®.w s_ a.w a �a . " ..R.R..wx w...ww..r. .`wwa.a +.r w»k uw�sewr swN .K.'«' u w aW.w. +ars u...wma sr.K � ..0 saw awuuamauww.awxua • vNw .. °N ��M✓.� � ��a �s.wx ..em.x xw °ws. xawr arwwsa xaw .. �.Nwrnr Mon.wa.x.o.. s��w °w • ws.wa.. wiW.s..wacx_..n_s ` mw�.�Mis wr ` .w.M. rT.... ` rwwrx •�vxwr__ _ _. M � Kiwi "�+.lrwm newwa Mwe esxa.•.w i s5�i�Ln�ivaw°.xwn�ww.a • - rO :=s. �.N.s <w a..w....ww m'M lN:� •... °. °• wx.x.w. G1 COLUMN SCHEDULE • .......a.�ix`�w... s.ar.�.N.r<.w �, ..u.Navn. e....K. ww. 0 H CONC REINF SPLICE LENGTH TABLE � _1 w.wx.°w.www.w.. C) m 0 SPREAD FTG SCHEDULE • ww.ww°w.,w: �a a j6 READ emr, ®Q g. r CONC PIER SCHEDULE a., z w w 0 :a <.. p = o IT .� i i . Xd. .. O O Lij .. .... n TYP FND WALL DET n TYP MAS WALL FTG n TYP FND DTL /1 TYP FND DTL (1 TYP FND DTL r (yl TYP FND WALL OTL ..,. -all • $ // °° .. ONTROL TCONTRACTIONIJOINTICJI nCONSTRUC710N JOINT TCONST JP NNTERNAL CORNER - - 7� NSOLA� TION JOINT IU) /VSOLATIpINT ®COL 7SCONTIN000S JT INTERSECTION rl TYP STOOP DTL n TYP SLAB -ON -GRADE JOINTS n TYP LAB- ON-GRADE REINF NOT USED n NOT USED i �ay.. .....c ..rm 4, 7 1 �w w _ 0 J �,' a �_ »� ~�•�_ _ `` »`�• ®... /\OOUBIE� LAIR a ` » — LAYER — r.DpUBLE LAYER = » � e INNGLE - LAYER Q O n THICKENED SLAB DTL n ISOLATED EQUIP PAD DTL n TYP FLOOR SLAB RECESS n TYP INTERSECTIO REINt1 F DTL n TYP CORNER REIN DTF L U CO 0 of a.. - - n TYP CON C PIER DTL TYP SLAB ON GRADE STAIR r1 TYP FTG REINF DTL (ml TYP FLOOR SLAB STEP DET n TYP BOTT STEP FTG DTL n TYP STEP FTG DTL + u .m a....r.e. 4 @ TYP SPREAD FTG DTL n NOT USED n NOT USED SLAB DTL OVERHEAD DOOR n TYP INTEGRAL HOUSEKEEPING PAD n LOADING DOCK DTL • • - - - - -- z w I Lo is LU .S .... Q s WALLWALL C WALLCONS T JT NOT USED rl DETAIL TRENCH DRAIN DTL TYP CONC WAIL J , INT DTL DETAIL DETAIL .... U ..., . :wr U ..,.. n DETAIL /1 DETAIL DETAIL DETAIL D ETAIL DETAIL J ? a .MM ` O , I va+r moew r�e 1 , E Q W z ..< " DETAIL � W'INrALLATION OF PIPES j m _ Q 0' N n ELEVATOR PIT DTL DETAIL DETAIL m NOT USED TYP INSTALLATION OF PIPES j u .d Y` a 06 o DETAIL rl DETAIL n DETAIL n DETAIL CHILLER SUPPORT DTL PROPANE TANK DTL J TV F LU m CU w LU eg 1 W ! O W 3 a L NOT USED /1 NOT USED r1 NOT USED n TYP JST BRG DTL P1 TYP JST BRG DTL TYP (1 JST REINF DTL . ... .... -a .... « STL JST EXTENDED ENDS n NOT USED NOT USED n OUTRIGGER BRG DTL NOT USED DECK DTL .... P..p �� »r. n .v. ro m ^ .m n MTL DECK ATTACHMENT SCHEDULE CONNECTION SCHEDULE CONNECTION SCHEDULE - CONNECTION SCHEDULE - — a - "ar .0 y: .0 w w w •��'." nor N r.. '«T':P1C,' PJi'w .0 w .w w w a« � Tn • � • .It�a�i' v 1 wN N xN w W w w 2 Z L t e .w w • «w �" a TYP JST BRG DTL ^NOT USED j J 6 g $ N u�.>..a ww +.. w.>•M........n `�f ..y P...A r� .. m aaa � J y s 9 to e •� lED CONN nplAN OLTED COIN n TYP ROOF DECK n TYP BM SPLICE DTL (1 TYP STL BM CONN DTL n TYP STL BM CBM CONN DTL n TYP SM TO COL DTL n DIAP CHORDIDRAG STRUT DTL .w «. ..w ».. w Ps - ... P.. ..w �� . a€ .« . rv- n TYP MECH OPNG S EQUIP SUPPORT TYP HANGING MECH UNIT DTL TYP HANGING MECH UNIT DTL TYP INTERRUPTION OF BRDG DTL 61 ro Cl n n n MTL DECK BRG DTL n NOT USED Z W to O :r LD .Y W •ws ® Q 1 LIJ �wsASy I I.Y a W 1 Y Q /1FIEADER DET /1HEADERIJAMB STUD PET NOT USED n DETAIL /71 DETAIL LEVATION ^BOTTOM CONK nSILLIJAMB DET ••�•p... n NOT USED TYP METAL STUD WALL DTL DETAIL n DETAIL —4 i N Q = W f p az n SKYLIGHT DTL NOT USED n NOT USED NOT USED NOT USED DETAIL J u .... .... ... • ~ m U O i � J n DETAIL n DETAIL ETA DIL DETAIL rl DETAIL DETAIL u ... .... .a. ?6 T - - I I i s CL p @ DETAIL [7 DETAIL n DETAIL n DETAIL DETAIL DETAIL I I F B s `F S is B • zr i ID r r R z t n ' m O o � � o m rn p M1.1 HVAC PLAN - AREA A DESIGN DLR Group w GLOBAL NORTH DEVELOPMENT All*- EpY M np RMMW y YAl bn • • • $# a I; 1 ( a —1 x O M ai I y t Z ai a 1 1 ( R m 1 t c 1 + __- .� m a z ! m $ ch !6 2 T m m v z c y ° c # y # Z r O w i m D w M5.1 MECHANICAL SCHEDULES AND DETAILS DESIGN DLR Group .� (j�QgAL NORTH DEVELOPMENT A— ftb— q R.nrvnp yiyrlp. . i • 1 Hil Hill # 9 ' � a I I�IEi e a #16�a iI3 AA 'j a ff ai i # A $# a I; 1 ( a —1 x O M ai I y t Z ai a 1 1 ( R m 1 t c 1 + __- .� m a z ! m $ ch !6 2 T m m v z c y ° c # y # Z r O w i m D w M5.1 MECHANICAL SCHEDULES AND DETAILS DESIGN DLR Group .� (j�QgAL NORTH DEVELOPMENT A— ftb— q R.nrvnp yiyrlp. . • 0 i *I 51 a� 0 m n 0 z D m n a X v m z DLR Group FP1.1 FIRE PROTECTION - AREA A °•° GLOBAL NORTH r m 0 0 m z v z O m in DESIGN DEVELOPMENT s� ; 0 m n y 0 Z D A m D D D m v a z FP1.2 YGLo LOBALNORTH RE PROTECTION - AREA B DLR Group ANYVfWfe 6Ufi "Ranngq Yderbn _ r m z 0 z 0 m DESIGN DEVELOPMENT J tz bz u bs u bz bz hi ao u u u LEGEND NOTES F ,,.. W t.o u u 1.2 u az bz to t. 1A bA h. bt 5w 111 bz ho tI 50 1.1 u O d w O }S lo It It JA It u u U to to u u u tI u ba u bA u 1.7 a tI IA L u IA u U Le, ; u u u to u W w x 5.o he u U u to u to 1. ho u L 5a u bA bA iz 1.� 1A . :1s ` to li : -... 1.7 to 1. tt iA a. u ba u u.,.: 5o u Q u u W. 1'. to bn It _u A. ' l ::. u u u U - -1z 5.. is ,3A -�• -ae "^'3.f' 3.9 1A .c to -!. £. h1 u bJ 5t u :.5a u 5.t u fio 5n .o ho a 5a ho 5a 1. ' t9, V. hs ha is 3:. :.a is iz i.� 19 3.e 3.t 1A 1.1 1s 1.4 it 1A u 5.o ho u u b.o ho to ho u U - u u ho %A td' 6s' a b 15 4.. a 1a t9 1.e is to U Ia lA is ,ia. _1ar b4 hz bt u b.o to 5.0 to bn 5.o ho tt to a., u 5A u iz LP to 1a lr 1A._ A. „ t. - ' To ,. ys 11'. .. u ho u u u u to b.o V. o.o It bA bA, .... he..: u 16' 1.1 1. .1. 1. to as u bA U 5.t to u u u u a u u ba u u hn. bo u u bt bA, , hr a. 1a.. 1A " :'a ... t. is 1s 1.4 u u 5A' to to bA u 5.e W. ba tt It u It u r i U u b.s u u U - It u u u It u tc u ao bt ht u u to to ba it h.!:.e: 1.9 u a 4 u t3 11 A to to u It to a t4 to ti u' tt as u u .h. = - .'Aa 119 #a - 59... 30 iz 1 " as ba is ., to u to IA ao i hs It to u 1. u bn u 5t 5t VI a 1a '}� `;:.:5.s' as U b.t ta:. - to It It to to uA hs tz to ba, ho u u u W. u u u to 3A is b u u It It u u u %.I ha'; is La 3A`. _?t9 -:a iA ' t9 b,9 s It u u :A. , -tar, u.- It u 1.a tI u to u 1z Ni hs" , aA 14 J'I` U u 5.t to u W. u { U u al to ::bA u u .tr u iz :Sz ':: 3,a - -tc is u as -: • is tt 5.a to bA It at 517 It ho u 52 .0 L 1t t 41 1A la hd,, I u bA u u to u to bA u ho u -, 5t u u u - Z . Sd. u At , _.bw Lt !� ,..3a So -.. 11 111. ' 12 bA u u 5n u u : 5A u L ai u'. a V. II ' u a r W = u u u It he U bz ti ho ao u u at' u ~ ... , .. J O SA a b. a , to t...:: A ,',o �.:3A U 6s...'SA 5a ht ao 5a tz 5a 1a to to ba 5a 5e Q Z a U_ J t .s U "6.._ 4s ba u. to bA U a to L ba u A. u 5t Q F m to U 3t 7.0 At 1.3 ba t. bo U a.o U to ba ba U to bA to: to U Q to ai .._..3z u U 3t' U 12 t3- u at to b.t: 1.1 tz 5a u U a u, to W _ to to' tai b. ti 19; !t�,q :z It It to ' s I. to 5 ie t. ti 54 to ho to It at to 52- 5.5 11 19 ki " A. I. a9. it u u u u u u u it to to u It L to D9 d.s u u u u 5a u u u ho u u� bt W u a. "ao U 1a is au" do t i it u," ht to ti b to to bn hr ao ao ba+ W. u b: is ` u Li 3a 3a :A 39 3a "' U, t+ r U ' u bw u to L It u 3A u to ba L ba bz 15 ,bs Is }X .r ' =; - :.L,; .L It u u it br u bd bt tt .' u as to, la a s -ti' hs bA a 1. 1. 1. tt 1. U h9 ho to ti ba u u It ai u h. te���tt to ti 10 u u u t1 b u u u u bn It , 4n u do tt u It br u U u to 1 'u. tz u to ba u. to u It to .% u u �.. to u - p. It u u u u u u ho ao 1. 5a 5z .� W to"�• b'0.,, to u. 7. ba 5A bn U U to 1., 0 ! R t bA at ba tt It 6 bt to It tt U k L tt aD a➢. b�t �^ 1. u u L u u tt u to bt u u to u u bt W. to u u u J " ® ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN ° u u u u u u It u u to to bo e e i i e i y0•a pre ytrl _ t t �e L , Aft , e t Abe ]l 3 z t f , e TV ?i • .-0a e e e s® as - e eft re-t r } a r t Y _ 4 r m z z m o m cn E1.1 LIGHTING PLAN -AREA A DESIGN DLR Group _ GLOBAL NORTH DEVELOPMENT EL,—l" P—*N ,, � � Er s t z C) 5 z D a 1 0) m O • m D z v 0 z to O m Cl) E1.2 LIGHTING PLAN - AREA B DESIGN DLR Group GLOBAL NORTH DEVELOPMENT MtlMUttu. E,gMnYp �^O Nwld. w..mcm, • • • sa Eo i� Ica m O �c m D 2 O � Z m E2.2 POWER PLAN - AREA B DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DLR Group GLOBAL NORTH 0 E i e � i m �0 r 1 3 1p D m x D � DLR Group E3.2 SPECIAL SYSTEMS PLAN - AREA B ��- GLOBAL NORTH 1 • I I r m 0 • m Z O I Z O m cn DESIGN DEVELOPMENT J B S - LZ A t ♦ y 0 t A ��Z �. A /j � l" / E3.2 SPECIAL SYSTEMS PLAN - AREA B ��- GLOBAL NORTH 1 • I I r m 0 • m Z O I Z O m cn DESIGN DEVELOPMENT J