Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011 07-14 PCP PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER JULY 14, 2011 REGULAR SESSION 1. Call to Order: 7:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes — June 16, 2011 4. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 5. Sears, Roebuck and Co. Planning App. No. 2011 -015 PUD Amendment submitted by Sears, Roebuck and Company for an amendment to the 1999 Brookdale Mall Planned Unit Development, by incorporating similar development standards approved under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. 6. Loren Van Der Slick (Gatlin Development Co) Planning App. No. 2011 -016 PUD Amendment to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development submitted by Loren Van Der Slik on behalf of Gatlin Development Company, Inc. 7. Discussion Items 8. Other Business 8. Adjournment Application Filed on 06/02/2011 City Council Action Should Be Taken By 08/02/2011 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2011 -015 Applicant: Sears, Roebuck and Co. Location: 1297 Brookdale Center Request: Minor Amendment to the 1999 Brookdale Mall Planned Unit Development (PUD) Meeting Date: July 14, 2011 INTRODUCTION Sears Roebuck Co. has submitted an application requesting minor amendment to the existing 1999 Brookdale Regional Shopping Center Planned Unit Development (PUD). Sears is requesting the City consider and approve the similar development standards granted to Gatlin Development Company under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development (SCC- PUD) applications. These standards are memorialized in City Council Resolution No. 2011 -85 and in the final Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions agreement between the City and Gatlin, with the following additional adjustments not approved under the 1999 PUD rezoning (noted as underlined text A. Allow 5 ft. rather than 15 ft. green strips at certain locations where an appropriate 3 to 3 -`/2 ft. high decorative masonry wall shall be installed to offset negative effects along Xerxes Avenue. (This standard was granted to Sears under the 1999 PUD agreement and is illustrated on the 1999 plan layout, attached hereto.) B. Allow a reduction in the 15 ft. parking setback and 35 ft. building setback along Bass Lake Road to offset the dedication of additional right of way for the trail improvements to replace the current trail easements C. Allow 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable area. (This standard was granted to Sears under the 1999 PUD agreement.) D. Allow 10 parkin spaces spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of restaurant area E. Allow the 60 ft. wide parking dimension standard for 90 degree parking rather than the 63 ft. (This standard was granted to Sears under the 1999 PUD agreement.) F. Allow a 52.5 ft wide parking dimension for 60 degree parking (Note: the Shingle Creek Crossing development plan demonstrates a 56 foot dimension standard) G. Allow two freestanding signs up to 320 sq. ft. in area along T. H. 100 (this standard was granted to Sears under the 1999 PUD agreement) and two Town Center identification signs (one additional) Bass Lake Road and one additional Town Center identification sign on Xerxes Avenue. H. Allow an increase from 15 percent to 20 percent of the allowable restaurant use without requiring additional parking at Brookdale based on the uniqueness of Brookdale, the mix of App. 2011 -015 07/14/2011 Page 1 uses and dynamics of multiple stops per person at the Center. (This standard was granted to Sears under the 1999 PUD agreement.) I. Allow a zero foot (0') lot line setback at the northeast corner of the Sears building and adjacent to the patio /plaza space. This application has been duly published in the official city newspaper and notices were mailed to neighboring property owners. BACKGROUND At the June 16, 2011 regular Planning Commission meeting, this item was introduced by Staff in order to determine the procedure in processing said application. At that meeting, Staff indicated that Sears' request was essentially a textual amendment to the underlying zoning standards granted to the Brookdale properties in 1999, which today remains as PUD /C -2 zoning. Staff further noted that the modifications proposed by Sears, relate specifically to setbacks and parking, and the application should be treated as a minor amendment to the overall PUD, which establishes guidelines and standards for future development and does not trigger a major amendment at this time. The Planning Commission affirmed the need for a public hearing and reaffirmed the goals of establishing unified development standards for the redevelopment of the entire Brookdale Mall properties. On March 8, 1999, the City Council approved the new zoning classification for the entire Brookdale Mall site from C -2 to PUD /C -2. The 1999 PUD included the following modifications: a) Allowed a 5 ft. rather than 15 ft. green strip at certain locations with a 3 to 3 '/2 ft. decorative masonry wall. b) Allowed 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable area. c) Allowed 60 ft. wide parking dimensions for standard 90 degrees parking and aisle width. d) Allowed two freestanding signs up to 320 sq. ft. in area along Hwy 100. e) Allowed an increase of 15 percent to 20 percent restaurant use without requiring additional parking. Although this rezoning and PUD process was submitted by the Talisman Companies (former mall owners), and involved the development of a new movie theater, food court and other improvements, the physical improvements of the Sears site (and others) remained unaffected by this change. By approving this PUD rezoning, the Council acknowledged that the entire Brookdale Mall site, including Sears were intertwined with the overall development plan of this PUD; that the zoning would help provide a cohesive balance and uniformity between all uses; and all users would be subject to the new underlying zoning and plans for this area. On May 23, 2011 the City Council approved the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD for the Brookdale properties with the exception of the Sears property and Holiday store, and accepted the modifications and variations to certain zoning standards noted previously. Sears was not part of this 2011 PUD application, and its property is not subject to the declarations and covenants of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreement. App. 2011 -015 07/14/2011 Page 2 ANALYSIS The PUD provisions are noted in the attached June 16, 2011 planning staff memo to the Commission. The requested changes are a textual amendment to the 1999 PUD Agreement to include the additional zoning variations and standards established for the adjoining Shingle Creek Crossing Redevelopment. In discussions with the applicant's attorney, staff has expressed its preferences that the redevelopment of the Brookdale Mall properties be considered as an overall PUD concept with similar variations, a common development theme and standards. In essence, the City is considering a textual amendment to the zoning standards established under the previous PUD process. ❖ PUD Amendment Considerations The Applicant is requesting "minor amendment to the existing Planned Unit Development... ", to expand the development standards to include the same zoning variations and development standards that were approved for the adjoining Shingle Creek Crossing development. The following information provides an explanation of the amendments Sears is requesting under this application and staff's responses to each item: A. Allow a reduction in the 15 sparking setback and 35 ft. building setback along Bass Lake Road to offset the dedication of additional right of way for the trail improvements to replace the current trail easements The City granted certain setback reductions to the SCC -PUD plan due to Gatlin agreeing to dedicate right -of -way along CR 10 /13ass Lake Road. Gatlin granted a 15 ft. right -of -way dedication for the new trail system, in lieu of a 15 ft. trail easement. This permitted 18 -20 ft. building setbacks and 5 ft. parking setbacks. As part of Sears' request, the city would consider the same reductions along Xerxes Avenue, subject to the condition that Sears dedicates a similar 15 ft. right -of -way strip along said Xerxes Avenue, and a 17ft. trail easement along the TH 100 right -of -way. The City is pursuing funding sources for completing this regional trail system. If the Applicant provides this dedication and trail easement, the City would accept the responsibility of installing these trails within these areas. B. Allow 10 parking spaces per 1 000 so. ft of restaurant area The City recognizes the parking standards in our current Zoning Ordinance may be in need of updating or revisions to accommodate today's progressive development styles (i.e. low - impact, pedestrian friendly, etc.) standards. Since the City approved this standard in the SCC -PUD plan, the City does not object to allowing or providing these same parking standards to the Sears property, subject to Sears submitting and receiving approval of a major plan amendment for a stand -alone restaurant. C. Allow a 52.5 ft wide parking dimension for 60 degree parking rather than the 57 ft. The City approved a reduction of the 57 ft. dimension for 60- degree parking areas in the SCC -PUD plan down to 52.5 ft., by means of reviewing other metro cities parking App. 2011 -015 07/14/2011 Page 3 standards and taking in consideration the Urban Land Institute's "T Dimensions of Parkin -4 ed. 2000) However, Gatlin successfully demonstrated in their PUD plan that a 56 ft. wide dimension (18 -ft stall — 20 -ft. aisle — 18 -ft. stall) was feasible, as illustrated below. SWSL _ J g 2� - -• I E — (T D - / The City would prefer and allow Sears to utilize the same 56 ft. dimensional standard, and allow a 52.5 ft. dimension for 60- degree parking subject to the Applicant demonstrating a viable parking layout as part of a major plan amendment. D. Allow two freestanding signs up to 320 sq. ft. in area along T. H. 100 and two Town Center identification signs (one additional) along Bass Lake Road and one additional Town Center identification sign on Xerxes Avenue. The entire Brookdale Mall site was subject to certain sign restrictions and standards as part of the previous approved PUD. Sears' signage was subject to these standards, which allowed for the existing wall signs, a small freestanding "Sears Automotive" sign near the 55 Street entry, and signage on the main ` Brookdale Mall" multi -tenant sign seen along TH 100. The final PUD agreement for Shingle Creek Crossing provided a very detailed sign program/plan for the entire mall site, including Sears (see attached sign plan exhibits SELL and SE1.2). The two 41 ft. high, freestanding pylon signs along T.H. 100 will have space for eight "tenants" while the three 20 ft. high Town Center signs noted above, (identified as "Major Pylon Signs" in the SCC -PUD Sign Program) also have space for eight tenants. The City believes the SCC -PUD included Sears as part of this sign program and allows Sears to have second standing on all six signs. If Sears chooses not to be part of the overall SCC -PUD sign program and forfeits all rights to placement of signs on these structures, the City would consider a separate sign program/plan, consistent with the City's Sign App. 2011 -015 07/14/2011 Page 4 Ordinance and as part of any major plan amendment. Under the C -2 zone, Sears is permitted two freestanding signs up to 250 sq. ft. in area and up to 32 ft. in height. E. Allow a zero foot (0) lot line setback at the northeast corner of the Sears building and adjacent to the patio /plaza space. This standard reaffirms the existing zero lot line situation that exists on the Sears building, which was illustrated in the 1999 PUD Plans and made part of the Brookdale Mall platting. With the removal of portions of the adjacent mall space and separation of buildings proposed by Gatlin Development, the City is simply acknowledging this zero line setback should the proposed plan amendments be carried out. CITY ENGINEER REVIEW The City Engineer has provided a review and comments regarding this application in the July 6, 2011 memorandum to city planning staff, attached hereto. Most of these comments and conditions reflect a major plan amendment, which is not being considered at this time. These conditions may be applicable to a future major plan amendment, which will involve site development, site planning, additional building and platting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission provide a motion recommending approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2011 -015, an amendment to the 1999 Brookdale Regional Shopping Center Planned Unit Development (PUD), subject to the following conditions: 1. The utilization of the subject property as proposed under any future site development or redevelopment plan shall conform to an approved Planned Unit Development plan or proposal, with the exception of the following additional variations from the 1999 PUD Agreement: A. Allow a reduction in the 15 ft. parking setback and 35 ft. building setback along Xerxes Avenue, subject to the Applicant dedicating an additional 15 ft. right -of -way for Xerxes Avenue and a 17 ft. wide trail easement along the southerly boundary adjacent to TH 100. B. Allow 10 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. to any new restaurant developments on the subject property, subject to the Applicant submitting and receiving approval of a major plan amendment or new PUD plan on the subject property for a stand -alone restaurant. C. Allow a 56 ft. wide parking dimension (18 -ft. stall -20 -ft. aisle -18 -ft. stall) for 60- degree parking. The City agrees to consider a reduction down to 52.5 ft., subject to the Applicant demonstrating a viable parking layout that would permit such reductions and submittal of a necessary plan amendment. App. 2011 -015 07/14/2011 Page 5 D. If Applicant chooses to remain a party to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Sign Program/Plan, they will be allowed to have secondary placement of tenant signs on the two freeway pylon and three major pylon signs being proposed and installed under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. If Applicant chooses not to be part of the SCC -PUD sign program and forfeits all rights to said signs, the City will consider a separate sign program/plan, similar to that submitted by Gatlin, and only as part of any major plan amendment. E. Continue to allow a zero foot (0') lot line setback at the northeast corner of the Sears building and adjacent to the patio /plaza space as granted under the 1999 PUD Agreement and plan. 2. The Applicant shall enter into and execute a PUD agreement with the City, as prepared by the City Attorney. Be it further resolved, that any future redevelopment of the Sears property shall include those conditions listed under the City Engineer's Review Memorandum dated July 6, 2011, which include the following: i. The Applicant shall dedicate and provide to the City a 15 ft. right -of -way dedication for Xerxes Avenue and a 17 ft. wide trail easement along the adjacent T.H. 100 right -of -way. ii. The Applicant shall install the 10 ft. concrete trail along the westerly and southerly boundary lines and within the dedicated right -of -way or trail easement areas. Design standards and details must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. iii. The Applicant shall provide entrance and streetscape elements at the 55 Avenue and Xerxes Avenue entrance similar to the entrance improvements provided at the 56 Avenue and Xerxes Avenue entrance in the Shingle Creek Crossing development. iv. The Applicant shall provide landscaping adjacent to the ring road and the 10 ft. trail similar to the Shingle Creek Crossing development. V. The Applicant shall provide an internal pedestrian and sidewalk plan for connections to Xerxes Avenue. vi. The Applicant shall provide a 10 ft. drainage and utility easement along the entire outer perimeter of the parcel. vii. The Applicant shall provide the City with a title search showing all City held easements and other encumbrances. ATTACHMENTS - Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011 -11 - City Engineer's Review Memorandum (dated July 6, 2011) - 1999 Brookdale Mall PUD Plan- Parking Layout (Sears') - Shingle Creek Signage Program Exhibits SEL1 & SE1.2 - Applicant's Letter to City Planning Staff (dated July 11, 2011) App. 2011 -015 07/14/2011 Page 6 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -11 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2011 -015 SUBMITTED BY SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2011 -015 submitted by Sears, Roebuck and Co. proposes an Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to the existing 1999 Brookdale Regional Shopping Center Mall redevelopment plan; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends additional adjustments not approved under the 1999 PUD Agreement, which are noted as follows: A. Allow a reduction in the 15 foot parking setback and 35 foot building setback along Bass Lake Road to offset the dedication of additional right of way for the trail improvements to replace the current trail easements. B. Allow 10 parking space per 1,000 sq. ft. of restaurant area. C. Allow a 52.5 ft wide parking dimension for 60 degree parking. D. Allow two freestanding signs up to 320 sq. ft. in area along T. H. 100 and two Town Center identification signs (one additional) along Bass Lake Road and one additional Town Center identification sign on Xerxes Avenue. E. Allow a zero foot (0') lot line setback at the northeast corner of the Sears building and adjacent to the patio /plaza space. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on July 14, 2011 where a staff report and public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development Amendment were received and considered by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development Amendment request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating such amendments contained in Section 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2011 -015 submitted by Sears Roebuck and Co. be approved based upon the following considerations: 1 1. The Planned Unit Development Amendment is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. 3. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 4. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this development can be considered an asset to the community. 5. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating Planned Unit Development Amendment as contained in Section 35 -355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2011 -006 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. The utilization of the subject property as proposed under any future site development or redevelopment plan shall conform to an approved Planned Unit Development plan or proposal, with the exception of the following additional variations from the 1999 PUD Agreement: a. Allow a reduction in the 15 -foot parking setback and 35 -foot building setback along Xerxes Avenue, subject to the Applicant dedicating an additional 15- foot right -of -way for Xerxes Avenue and a 17 -foot wide trail easement along the southerly boundary adjacent to TH 100; b. Allow 10 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. to any new restaurant developments on the subject property, subject to the Applicant submitting and receiving approval of a major plan amendment or new PUD plan on the subject property for a stand -alone restaurant; c. Allow a 56 -ft wide parking dimension (18 -ft stall -20 -ft. aisle -18 -ft. stall) for 60- degree parking. The City agrees to consider a reduction down to 52.5 feet, subject to the Applicant demonstrating a viable parking layout that would permit such reductions and submittal of a major plan amendment; 2 d. If Applicant chooses to remain a party to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Sign Program/Plan, they will be allowed to have secondary placement of tenant signs on the two freeway pylon and three major pylon signs being proposed and installed under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. If Applicant chooses not to be part of the SCC -PUD sign program and forfeits all rights to said signs, the City will consider a separate sign program/plan, similar to that submitted by Gatlin, and only as part of any major plan amendment; and e. Continue to allow a zero foot (0') lot line setback at the northeast corner of the Sears building and adjacent to the patio /plaza space as granted under the 1999 PUD Agreement and plan; and 2. Execution of a PUD Amendment agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any future redevelopment of the Sears property shall include those conditions listed under the City Engineer's Review Memorandum dated July 6, 2011, which include the following: i. The Applicant shall dedicate and provide to the City a 15 -foot right -of -way dedication for Xerxes Avenue and a 17 -foot wide trail easement along the adjacent T.H. 100 right -of- way. ii. The Applicant shall install the 10 -foot concrete trail along the westerly and southerly boundary lines and within the dedicated right -of -way or trail easement areas. Design standards and details must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. iii. The Applicant shall provide entrance and streetscape elements at the 55 Avenue and Xerxes Avenue entrance similar to the entrance improvements provided at the 56 Avenue and Xerxes Avenue entrance in the Shingle Creek Crossing development. iv. The Applicant shall provide landscaping adjacent to the ring road and the 10 -foot trail similar to the Shingle Creek Crossing development. V. The Applicant shall provide an internal pedestrian and sidewalk plan for connections to Xerxes Avenue. vi. The Applicant shall provide a 10 -foot drainage and utility easement along the entire outer perimeter of the parcel. vii. The Applicant shall provide the City with a title search showing all City held easements and other encumbrances. 3 Date Chair ATTEST Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chair , Commissioners and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i i I 4 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 6, 2011 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning specialist FROM: Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor Steve Lillehaug, City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Works Review for Planning Application No. 2011 -015 Planned Unit Development -1999 Brookdale Mall Planned Unit Development Public Works Department staff reviewed the documents submitted for review for the Planned Unit Development amendment dated June 24, 2011, and provide the following recommendations, conditions and comments: 1. Irrigate entire turf and landscape areas. 2. If retaining walls are installed along Xerxes Avenue due to any approved reduction in setbacks or other reasons, the walls must match the natural Kasota stone retaining walls in other areas within the Xerxes Avenue corridor. 3. Provide entrance and streetscape elements similar to that proposed for the 55 Avenue at Xerxes Avenue entrance, similar to the Shingle Creek Crossing development. 4. Provide an internal pedestrian and sidewalk plan. 5. Provide a 10 -foot trail along the southerly and westerly ring road to complete the missing link for the regional trail. Design standards and details must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 6. Provide landscaping adjacent to the ring road and the 10 -foot trail similar to the Shingle Creek Crossing development. 7. Provide a parking study that demonstrates reduced parking ratios are adequate and acceptable for the proposed and/or current use. 8. Provide a 10 -foot drainage and utility easement along the entire outer perimeter of the parcel. 9. Provide a 10 -foot streetscape and trail easement along Xerxes Avenue. 10. Provide a 16 -foot trail easement for the 10 -foot regional trail. 11. Provide the City with a title search showing all City held easements and other encumbrances. 12. No signs shall be allowed in any easement areas. Sign plans must be submitted for final review and approval. PARKING y ENTRANCE r ,. / 1+• Traftic Signe! � j f �� "; EN NCE 1 r TAUSMAN• TRACT w �. 75 c� 114 (11 i ' I u, 4 y � ^ ,�� I _ ' `" "".Et.r - ':�,• .. .. r .� i X634 :Wsonry Wall I � l �l ili`!1 1 1 1 I Rub _ ,I! II ± I li Q y ; PA"G JC PE"Y' Savice Cq ENTRANCE ' mimn ' o.priww s>da. a tewl . ,Court . n MALL TTT I:.f.i r t ; r ' _ � Ehft9 Arline= I —e smy wag . •� RRRAAA � � _ J������ T AN GT: - , I � R to ' Y �,,. _ -.+•� - I ��.. 1999 BROOKDALE MALL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE PLAN. LEVEL ONE PLAN, (SEARS' PARKING LAYOUT) - NANT TENANT TENAN TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENAm TENMIT TENANT TENAN TENAM r �` � � - -_ TENANT TENANT TENANT : : --------------- - -_"- — - --- l _ i - ---- r—' .:' -- -----__--- __—_—__--- -- _c 1�{ I TENANT 1 / 1 .... �•�.PTnn/mn 1 L� ", 3 l z p V Si , _ 'I K S i c 5Aa- l _ is L� K 1 r: J ________ _. 6� 5 r NORTH h� C 4 5 TENAM " 11 TENANT �� mac` f�N. 4`,�� � / ✓. E�t'� TENANT TENANT •� 4� ' y �G , TENANT TENANT ' �)'. ~,Wryr�•-� i / TENANT TENANT t� \,? ,,� L /: i . TENANT uTl � TENANT %1 naolEC *rAweEz ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SITE SIGNAGE EXHIBIT ( " CONSORTIUM L.L.C `it / 901 North 3rd streel :12435.4030 GMINDEWI,OPMWCOMPANY BROOKLYN CENTER, MN SCALE: N.T.S. SE1.1 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612 -682 -9950 Archkectural Consor0um, L.L.C. 2010 10 INTERIOR ILLUMINATED 516N PANEL - 13'-0" TENANT — Two -51vED - 4 0 — IS SF SIGN AREA Q fl SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 4 TENANT PAD TE NANT MONUMENT 516N NOTE: CORPORATE BLUE PREFIN. LOGO / GRAPHICS TENANT METAL FIN ALLOWED UPON REVIEW AND Q TENANT L P L FROM INTERIOR ILLUMINATED 4 ry TENANT 516N PAN@L5 - 10 1-0" TWO -SIDED - T ENANT 312 SF SIGN AREA TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT INTERIOR ILLUMINATED O 516N PANELS - Q 0 Q TENANT TWO -51DED - d �_ TENANT 140 5F 516N AREA TENANT TENANT Q e0 TENANT Q v IT-4 15 -0" MAJOR FREEWAY MAJOR PYLON 516N PYLON 516N ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SITE SIGNAGE EXHIBIT CONSORTIUM L.L.C. ( b � 10 901 North 3rd street 6124364030 GMM DB'E[OPMEM'COMPW BROOKLYN CENTER, MN SCALE: 1/8" = 1' -0" Minneapolis, MN 55001 F-612-692-NW Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2010 HINSHAW & C U L B E R T S O N L L P ATTORNEYS AT LAW 333 South Seventh Street Suite 2000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 -2431 July 11, 2011 612- 333 -3434 612- 334 -8888 (fax) VIA E -MAIL & U.S. MAIL www.hinshawlaw.com FILE NO. 64444-879479 Mr. Gary Eitel Mr. Tim Benetti Director of Business and Development Planner City f Brooklyn Center City Brooklyn Center Y Yn h' Yn 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199 Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199 Re: Sears r Application for a Minor PUD Plan Amendment ( "Application ") Dear Gary and Tim: Following our conversation, I discussed your comments concerning Sears Minor PUD Plan Amendment Application of Sears, Roebuck and Co. ( "Sears ") with my clients. We wanted to provide you with our response to your comments on several key issues, so that you and the Planning Commission are advised of Sears' position, and will approve Sears' Application as requested. Variations in Reducing The 15 Foot Parking Setback to 5 Feet and the 35 Foot Building Setback to 20 Feet You stated that these variations were granted to Gatlin to offset its dedication of additional right -of -way for the regional trail improvements and as such did not represent real variations from the City's standards. However, you stated that the City would be willing to grant similar variations to Sears, if Sears would be willing to dedicate additional right -of -way for the regional trail improvements, and that the City would look for funding for construction of the trail. Without committing in any way to such a substantial dedication of land, Sears' management has asked me to inquire about the details of the dedication, construction, and maintenance of the proposed trail. Specifically, Sears would like to know: 121284417v1 64444 Arizona California Florida Illinois Indiana Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri New York Oregon Rhode Island Wisconsin Mr. Gary Eitel Mr. Tim Benetti July 11, 2011 Page 2 (1) What would be the technical construction standards used for the trail and would these be the same for the trail constructed on Gatlin's property? (2) What type of lighting and safety features would be incorporated into the construction of the trail? (3) Would the city or county be responsible for the maintenance and any necessary repair of the trail? (4) Would the City provide a credit to Sears for such a dedication for any park and/or trail dedication requirements imposed if a major PUD Plan Amendment is ever sought by Sears? and (5) Would Sears have this option in the future should Sears redevelop its property of providing this dedication and receiving these same variations for setback requirements? The information will be helpful to Sears in determining its response to the requested dedication. Variations in Parking Ratios and Dimensions You stated that you did not see any problem with granting the same parking ratio and dimension variations to Sears that were granted to Gatlin. However, you stated that while the resolution approved a 52.5 foot wide parking dimension for 60 degree parking, Gatlin was only seeking to use a 56 foot wide parking dimension. Because the Resolution approving Gatlin's PUD grants Gatlin the legal right to have the 52.5 foot wide parking dimension, Sears is requesting the 52.5 foot parking standard. If granting that request requires some further demonstration of its safety, please advise as to the source of that requirement and the details and Sears will provide its legally required demonstration. Variation in Reduction to Zero Side -Yard Setback You mentioned that because Gatlin is now seeking to amend its PUD to eliminate the zero side -yard setback, that this variation would not be available. However, Sears would respectfully point out that the Resolution does grant the zero side -yard setback and the rationale for that decision remains. The fact that Gatlin has now sought to change its plans does not mean that the basic policy supporting the variation does not continue to exist. Additionally, I confirmed with you that Sears would be able to rebuild up to its current lot line. Sears would request the Planning Commission grant that zero side -yard setback variation along the entire northeasterly border of its property. 1212844170 64444 Mr. Gary Eitel Mr. Tim Benetti July 11, 2011 Page 3 If you need further clarification of Sears' position, please advise. We would ask that you incorporate these points in your report to the Planning Commission and provide this letter to them as well. As always, thank you for your help and assistance. I look forward to continue working with you on this matter. Very truly yours, HINS & CULBERTSON LLP Thom J adio 612 -33 - 653 tradio@hinshawlaw.com TJR/paw cc: (via a -main Charles L. Lefevere, City Attorney Elizabeth Williams Sherry Devoe Robyn Alexander Ron Rozanski L. J. Rotman 121284417YI 64444 Of Business and Development JTB Cewter— Department www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199 Phone 763.569.3300 TTY /Voice 711 Fax 763.569.3494 TO: Chair Sean Rahn and Brooklyn Center Planning Commission FROM: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development Tim Benetti, Planning & Zoning Specialist DATE: June 16, 2011 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Application No. 2011 -015 — Set Public Hearing Sears, Roebuck Co. requests for amendment to the 1999 Brookdale PUD Agreement Introduction Sears Roebuck Co. has submitted a planning application requesting amendment to the 1999 Brookdale Mall Planned Unit Development (PUD). This item is being introduced and presented at tonight's meeting to provide an update and preliminary review of the request to the Planning Commission. Upon completion of this review, city staff requests the Commission set a Public Hearing for July 14, 2011 to fully consider this item. Background The following identifies the zoning modifications that were approved with the 1999 PUD Rezoning and included in the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions: Resolution No. 99 -37, established a PUD /C -2 zoning classification for the Brookdale properties on March 8, 1999 and included the following modifications to the development standards for the redevelopment of the Brookdale Planned Unit Development: a) Allowed a 5 ft. rather than 15 ft. green strip at certain locations with a 3 to 3 '/2 ft. decorative masonry wall. b) Allowed 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable area. c) Allowed 60 ft. wide parking dimensions for standard 90 degrees parking and aisle width. d) Allowed two freestanding signs up to 320 sq. ft. in area along Hwy 100. e) Allowed an increase of 15 percent to 20 percent restaurant use without requiring additional parking; and, On May 23, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011- 77, which approved the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD for the Brookdale properties (with the exception of the Sears lot), along with the following modifications to the development standards of the zoning ordinance: A. Allow 5 ft. rather than 15 ft. green strips at certain locations where an appropriate 3 to 3 %2 ft. high decorative masonry wall shall be installed to offset negative effects along Xerxes Avenue. B. Allows a reduction in the 15 foot parking setback and 35 foot building setback along Bass Lake Road to offset the dedication of additional right of way for the trail improvements to replace the current trail easements. C. Allow 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable retail area and 10 per 1,000 sq. ft. of restaurant area rather than the 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area and one per two seats and employee on a major shift for restaurants. D. Allow the 60 ft. wide parking dimension standard for 90 degree parking rather than the 63 ft. and a 52.5 ft wide parking dimension for 60 degree parking rather than the 57 ft. E. Allow two freestanding signs up to 320 sq. ft. in area along T. H. 100 and two Town Center identification signs (one additional) along Bass Lake Road and one Town Center identification sign on Xerxes Avenue. F. Allow an increase from 15 percent to 20 percent of the allowable restaurant use without requiring additional parking at Brookdale based on the uniqueness of Brookdale, the mix of uses and dynamics of multiple stops per person at the Center. Zoning Ordinance Pursuant to Section 35 -355 Planned Unit Development Subd. 5, Para. i. Application and Review the following shall be taken in consideration when reviewing amendments: Any major amendment to the development plan may be approved by the City Council following the same notice and hearing procedures specified in this section. An amendment shall be considered major if it involves any change greater than that permitted by Subdivision 5d of this section. Changes which are determined by the City Council to be minor may be made if approved by the Planning Commission after such notice and hearing as may be deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission. Subd 4, Para. d. General Standards Prior to construction on any site zoned PUD, the developer shall seek plan approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 of this ordinance. In addition to the information specifically required by Section 35- 230, the developer shall submit such information as may be deemed necessary or convenient by the City to review the consistency of the proposed development with the approved development plan. The plan submitted for approval pursuant to Section 35 -230 shall be in substantial compliance with the approved development plan. Substantial compliance shall mean: - that buildings, parking areas and roads are in essentially the same location as previously approved; - the number of dwelling units, if any, has not increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; - the floor area of nonresidential areas has not been increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; - no building has been increased in the number of floors; - open space has not been decreased or altered from its original design or use, and - lot coverage of any individual building has not been increased or decreased by more than 10 percent. At this time, Sears Co. has submitted an official planning application for future consideration of an amendment to this original 1999 Brookdale Mall PUD. This request reflects the variations recently approved under the 2011 SCC -PUD plans. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of the Sears planning application; initial submittal letter of request (dated June 1, 2011); and a letter of explanation to the request (dated June 15, 2011), both from Sear's attorney. In reference to the Zoning Code 35 -355; Subd. 5, Para. i., planning staff is requesting the Planning Commission determine if this request is deemed minor; and if so, direct staff to have this item presented under public hearing at the July 14, 2011 regular meeting. Application Filed on 06/22/2011 City Council Action Should Be Taken By 08/21/2011 (60 Days) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 2011 -016 Applicant: Loren Van Der Slik Location: 1108 Brookdale Center Request: Planned Unit Development Amendment — Shingle Creek Crossing INTRODUCTION The applicant, Loren Van Der Slik for Gatlin Development Company, is seeking a Planned Unit Development Amendment to the previously approved Shingle Creek Crossing redevelopment plans. The amendment consists of the following components: 1. The physical separation of the existing retail mall /food court building from the existing Sears retail store building; 2. The renovation/conversion of the interior mall (common area) into retail space, which expands the net leasable retail area from 123,242 sq. ft. to 150,591 sq. ft.; 3. The elimination of proposed Building N from the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD plan; 4. The expansion of the central parking area on Lot 2, Block 1 (Building N lot) which adds 103 parking stalls to serve the additional retail of the Food Court building; 5. The addition of a 6,000 sq. ft. commercial pad site with 30 rrking stalls labeled as Building R, located at the southeast corner of Xerxes Avenue /56 Avenue entrance, along with a new 0.71 acre lot. This item is being presented for consideration under a public hearing process for a major PUD plan amendment. The public hearing notices have been duly published and mailed to the surrounding property owners. BACKGROUND On May 23, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011 -85, which approved the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD for the Brookdale properties, with the exception of the Sears and Holiday gas station properties. Gatlin Development has successfully closed on the former mall properties and is now performing asbestos removal, salvage and demolition work on the site. As part of Gatlin's ongoing negotiations with Sears and their desire to resolve a number of site and development concerns raised by Sears, Gatlin has submitted this amendment for the City's consideration. This report and related attachments reflect the new changes to the approved Shingle Creek Crossing plan, which exceed the threshold of a minor amendment. The following section of this report will provide a detail of the new changes in the Shingle Creek PUD Plan and App. No. 2011 -016 PC 07/14/2011 Page 1 related issues identified by staff. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (AMENDMENTS) 1. The physical separation of the existing retail malUfood court building from the existing Sears retail store building, As illustrated on the attached plan sheets, the Gatlin -Sears negotiations include a 40' -5 %i" separation of the former food court/mall building from the Sears store. The plans also illustrate the following: • Within this 40 -foot corridor, the developer intends to install a 13.5 -foot wide landscaped walkway along the northerly edge of the Sears building with the remaining 26.85 feet shown as a new driveway /alley between both buildings. • The proposed relocation of the existing loading/truck dock station next to the former Barnes and Noble Book Store to the southwest corner of the building to facilitate a larger retail user (70,000+ sq. ft.) that would face Xerxes Ave. • The redesign of the parking area to accommodate the relocated loading area and truck movements. • A new /relocated mechanical room and trash enclosure area is illustrated in a recessed, gated portion of the building which is accessed by the new drive /alley between both buildings. • The construction of a new 16' x 50' entry way near the northeast corner of the Sears building, along with the new adjacent patio /plaza space at this entry point. • The architectural treatment of the exterior wall of the former food court building (EFIS on the upper portion and colored spit face block). The wall section also identifies the location of decorative lighting on the lower section of said walls. The developer has indicated that the proposed drive /alley between the buildings has two functions: 1. As a utility drive it functions to service the trash area and mechanical & utility room; 2. As an extension of the internal access drive lanes it allows the connection of the central parking area to the western/Xerxes Ave. parking area. Note: The developer has expressed a concern that without a connection, the main parking area may become congested and over parked given the new entrance to Sears. In a recent conversation with the developer, Staff has expressed its concerns on the following: • The aesthetic treatment of this separation so it does not appear to be an alley; • The safety of pedestrian and vehicular use within this corridor /proposed side yards; • the safety of pedestrian using the walkways which cross this proposed drive; and • the need for better connection and interior traffic flow to access the Sears parking area. The developer has indicated a willingness to consider a one way traffic flow from the App. No. 2011 -016 PC 07/14/2011 Page 2 Main/Central parking area and that they would work on the aesthetic treatment of this drive area. Additionally, he also requested that the issues /concerns with the relocation of the loading dock area (currently adjoining the Barnes & Noble Book Store) be deferred until the site plan review for this building. At that time, design alternatives for specific uses could be considered. Staff has indicated that those alternatives could include the following: a) Include in the truck dock areas an area dedicated trash enclosure /compactor area; b) allow only one -way vehicle /truck traffic from east to west thru the drive - aisle; or c) provide only one access opening at the westerly end with limited drive -aisle or pavement up to the trash enclosure area/mechanical & utility room. The remaining segment would be improved with a full -width walkway or plaza space up to the easterly end, which would be curbed and guttered, or blocked with landscaping or bollards to prevent vehicles from accidentally accessing or entering this area. Because we do not have enough details on this drive /pedestrian way, the City would recommend that any final design or architectural elements be discerned or approved later under separate site plan review by Gatlin when the time comes to improve this "existing" Food Court building. The City recognizes that as part of Gatlin's ongoing negotiations with Sears, one important provision is this separation of the two buildings. Staff believes that allowing [approving] the separation measures to take place is acceptable and can be allowed under the overall PUD Amendment process, with further understanding that the final driveway design, landscaping, lighting, architectural and aesthetic elements will be approved under separate site plan review. Upon removal of the walls between both buildings, Gatlin will be responsible for restoring the north wall to Sears and south wall to the multi -tenant (former food court) building. Both buildings, once restored with new walls, will meet the required 10 -foot setbacks required under the C -2 Zoning. The location of the new 16' x 50' entry way at the northeast corner of Sears will encroach over the property line. Options to eliminate this encroachment include making the entry flush with the outer building wall; adjust property lines (re -plat) between Gatlin and Sears; or acknowledge and insert a provision in the PUD agreement that provides for this encroachment. Gatlin has informed staff that this entryway encroachment will be covered under an easement agreement between Gatlin and Sears. Any easement or similar agreement to allow this encroachment issue would need to be approved by the City Attorney. 2. The renovation/conversion of the interior mall (common area) into retail space, which expands the net leasable retail area from 123,242 sq. ft. to 150,591 sq. ft.; The original Shingle Creek Crossing PUD proposed this building to have up to 123,242 sq. ft. of available retail space. City staff assumed the central mall corridor would remain with separate interior access /entry points, along with exterior door entries to the respective tenant spaces, App. No. 2011 -016 PC 07/14/2011 Page 3 The new 150,000+ sq. ft. floor -plan illustrates a large 70,285 sf. tenant space; followed by three mid -range level tenants (18,128 sf., 21,360 sf. & 24,762 sf.); plus two small level (4,057 & 5,549 sf. spaces) and a 5,064 sf, cafe space. All spaces (except the cafe) would have access to a much narrower service corridor, which connects all uses to the service /loading docks and trash enclosure area. Gatlin intends to relocate the existing at -grade loading/truck dock in the food court building from a central area of the building to the far southwest corner of the building. The plans also reflect a redesign of the parking area in front of this loading dock area to accommodate the truck movements. A new trash enclosure area is also illustrated in a recessed, gated portion of the building to be accessed by the new roadway between both buildings. Staff is aware that some of these physical building changes are a direct result of Gatlin's attempts to accommodate the large tenant user. However, marketing efforts to secure this tenant has not reached fruition yet, and this layout may be subject to change. In any event, the city would prefer to see that any changes to this building, both interior and exterior will be subject to and approved by final site plan consideration. 3. The elimination of proposed Building Nfrom the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD plan; The elimination of Building N from the SCC site results in a number of adjustments. First, the 2.27 acre lot that accompanied this building is eliminated and residual lot area is added into the food court lot. The resulting parcel for the food court reconciles out to 13.43 acres. Secondly, the resulting loss of Bldg. N creates a new landscaped median between the Shingle Creek Crossing area and the Sears loading dock area. EXISTING PROPOSED , 'dT _ rT p , Based on the approved SCC -PUD plans, delivery trucks serving Sears and Bldg. N would be allowed to cross -over property boundaries to make deliveries. The plan now illustrates an additional 15 -foot easement space granted from Gatlin to Sears to accommodate Sears' truck deliveries, as per the Gatlin -Sears agreement. App. No. 2011 -016 PC 07/14/2011 P4ge 4 Customer vehicles were also allowed to exit to the south of Bldg. N and gain access over to the Sears lot or continue southward to the access /ring -road along the southerly boundary line. All vehicles leaving this area attempting to head southward would need to meander their way through the delivery /loading areas serving Wal -Mart, which is not ideal considering the large amount of truck traffic Wal -Mart will create. Staff would prefer to see break or opening be made at the southerly tip of this median to allow for free movement of vehicles to and from this area. Also, landscaping may need to be added to ensue complete screening; adjusted to ensure clear sight lines; and stop signs to ensure vehicles do not interfere with any heavy trucks leaving the Sears loading area. The City Engineer also raised these same concerns and provided alternatives and comments in his review memo. The City Engineer has also requested an updated truck traffic movement plan that shows how all loading areas function. The original SCC -PUD agreement contained such a plan and this will need to be updated (amended) as part of any approvals. Staff has relayed these concerns to the Developer, who is now working on providing updated pan sets that would address these issues. 4. The expansion of the central parking area on Lot 2, Block I (Building N lot) which adds 103 parking stalls to serve the additional retail of the Food Court building. The additional parking is a direct result of the elimination of Lot 2, Block 1 (and Building N) from the SCC -PUD plan. The resulting loss provides 103 additional parking spaces within the site, which off -sets the additional parking needs of the proposed retail space expansion in the Food Court building, and the loss of parking due to the creation of Building R and its lot (with 30 parking spaces). The approved SCC -PUD site data table reflected the Food Court bldg. would be parked at a ratio of 4.53 spaces /1000 sf, of GLA (558 spaces for 123,242 GLA); while the new layout reflects a ratio of 4.5 spaces /1000 sf. GLA (678 spaces for 150,591 GLA). The new layout design meets the approved 4.5/1000 sf. GLA approved in the 2011 SCC -PUD Agreement. S. The addition of a 6,000 sq. ft. commercial pad site to be labeled Building R along with a new platted lot. The new 0.71 acre building site is shown with a 6,000 sq. ft. commercial building with 30 parking spaces. This 511,000 sf. ratio exceeds the 4.5 spaces /1,000 sf. allowed under the SCC -PUD standards for typical retail stores. This replat is not part of or approved under this application process, and shall be completed under separate plat application. Because the area of this lot is inside the approved SCC -PUD perimeters, it will be subject to the 2011 PUD standards, including architectural and design material standards. App. No. 2011 -016 PC 07/14/2011 Page 5 CITY ENGINEER'S REVIEW Attached is a copy of the City Engineer's memorandum dated July 6, 2011, which identifies concerns and issues which should be addressed as part of the PUD Amendment submittal. Conditions required by the City Engineer can be made part of any recommendations of approval. Please note some or most of these conditions will be reviewed and approved under separate planning consideration, such as the re- platting and site plan review. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that a motion be made to table this item to either the July 28, 2011 study session meeting or the August 11, 2011 regular meeting, as determined by the Planning Commission. During this time, City staff will work with the Applicant/Developer on the concerns or issues raised in this planning report and City Engineer's memo, and provide an updated planning information report with certain findings and recommendations at the next scheduled meeting date. Attachments - City Engineer's Review Memo — dated July 6, 2011 - 2011 PUD Amendment Plan Set a) Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan - June 2011 b) Sheet EX -X (Alternative Site Plan) c) Sheet Al -Q (Leasing Plan) d) Sheet A2 -Q (Exterior Elevations) e) Sheet EX -1 (Sears Improvements- North Side) f) Truck Route Plan i App. No. 2011 -016 PC 07/14/2011 Page 6 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 6, 2011 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning specialist FROM: Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor Steve Lillehaug, City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Works Review for Planning Application No. 2011 -016 Planned Unit Development - Shingle Creek Crossing Public Works Department staff reviewed the documents submitted for review for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) dated June 24, 2011, and provides the following recommendations, comments and conditions for only those changes pertaining to the added Site R, the deleted Site N and the added separation on the north side of the Sears building: 1. Adding the proposed separation between the buildings as proposed detracts from the overall PUD development and introduces issues pertaining to the long narrow corridor including safety and security issues, functionality, imposing traffic restrictions to prohibit vehicles from accessing this area and other less than desirable issues that should not be an element of a new type of development if they can be avoided, especially as a PUD. If allowed, the following revisions should be included pertaining to this area: a. Prohibit all vehicle traffic between buildings. b. Raised curb and gutter should be carried through each end of the separated area. c. Traffic restricted to pedestrians only. d. Provide full -time security plan for this corridor. e. Provide landscape and sidewalk plans. f. Proper clearance must be provided between service doors and sidewalk. g. Trash pick -up and storage should be revised to a location that has direct access to areas with vehicular traffic. 2. Provide an updated major access routes exhibit for the entire development that includes defined truck routes to Site R, elimination of Site N, and for the new loading dock to the existing building and retail shops. 3. All newly proposed loading dock and truck turning/backing areas must be fully separated from public customer parking areas, must not direct or invite public parking ingress /egress routes through loading dock and turning/backing areas, and must not encroach on main drive aisles. Truck turning and access movements must be provided to demonstrate adequacy. Final access routes and turning movements for all loading dock areas will be subject to final City review and approval conditions of the Preliminary Plan. 4. Architectural building elevation plans must show both walls between the separated buildings and must be equally designed and match the external wall architectural standards throughout the development, including the Sears wall. 5. The revised parking g arkin lot design on the east side of Sears old Site N is landlocked from access to the southerly ring road, with the exception of through the Walmart loading dock area. This is unacceptable and must be fully separated. 6. No other revisions to the layouts pertaining to any of the other sites have been reviewed and are not considered amendments to the PUD. All items, recommendations and conditions are preliminary planned unit development review comments only and are meant to represent and guide the future planning and development of site plans and the corresponding revisions to the property plat and easements that are necessary. All conditions are subject to further review, revision and approval as part of any future re- platting and site plan review. 7 ° i i a. � $,- - .'#7 "_� �t.i I II �^i J P �, } n3'1 ' r i lr � � r y ° JW it li i i J °P I ♦ � t I ( �r lHJ- �►'_r�h lt% lit, yw titi�r. JC `� _ . - / - ^ i I I� ♦ ♦ q♦ ►. •\te4♦ ++►N3 ii iii}}'rliptk.g t1 ; ..... ... � ♦ r'4 II i o 0000c� o00 0 - n 00 $ ' - COUNTY ROAD NO.WTO �!°° - - - -- -- -' _ _� . �► PROPOSED PYLON SIGN .' ►' . $ _ PROPCSED PYLON SIGN PROPOSED MONUMENT ,. /j; SIGN PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN iE', EXISTING 8Mod RIFFLES AND WALL ^� / f _ _ IMPROVEMENTS' 'Igor 10,92W j I I PROPOSED SHINGLE ► ►- o to '.s b CREEK REGIONAL , i 4+� DIRECTIONAL = i ,'�'� i SIGN �,f�, �, • � JJJ��/ / � ,: � � / � �, z '. , jX/ y , ? ' ( � � PROPOSED DAYLIGHTED SHINGLE CREEK t �� = "•'� ...:.. ,� �= ' '�� ,.. t_ -- ° u " T ' �� y- N F L RAIN GARDEN "� - ' �, TRAIL CONNECTION / e (TYP.) `� ;� , � ' e ss.SROSr TO EXISTING BRIDGE # � �;Y 'lx 29 510sr PROPOSED PYLON SIGN I - c.ow: BuILOaN Walmart',. SHOPS - STORE #5625 -00 C / , i /t .f. - fi "}•, '� C- 160- SGL-NO _ ` . 161,943 S.F. (APPROX.) Ll.l �, CV 0 EXISTING SHINGLE CREEK BOX CULVERT � PROPOSED FREEWAY PYLON SIGN (1 �� F AREA(TYPJ �.. 1; I' t t_ •� __ E XISTING SEARS - (NOT IN I " CONTRACT) SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING � s `�' � v, s :=� � fir `�•. BROOKLYN CENTER, MN �X ti V PROPOSED PYONSIGN MASTER PLAN 1 y ,G •� PROPOSED FREEWAY,' JUNE 2011 PYLON SIGN ,; ice i -,♦ �\, � 1 j i >',:. / .t 0 60 120 240 FT t � it Kimley -Horn GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY NOTE' and Associates, Inc. � .t V �� • �i / ' - � ' 101 South Main Street -T. IMPROVEMENTS TO SEARS PARCEL IS NOT PART OF THIS PUD AND Dickson, Tennessee 37055 5T. _ b,iNNESG A 5x' 14 Tel 615 Ti L c511 545 ARE SUBJECTTO CITY APPROVAL. 4' 37 : 1 FAY;. >,.. (551) 6a_ -5175 Fa>t;615-046-7I05 } a } a > Q x _ Z a r 1 O 1= r. 4 U Q�fiP r F �® N COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD o J • • �,. COUNTY COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD u•, .. _ _ _ _ • I Wi y i � Tt ,2 225sr mil! I elt a - 91mf O •, L 11, 1 J T 7 89Dsr - F O - L r - 11.20W \� B CK( - - B� 11_LLI. h A OT EXISTING <" 8500sf /•' KOHL'S % 'LOT BLO �� k �'�< K v /�� J�jT� �. -� STATE L C HIGHWAY - G _ 11 r1 L 41 � . ?, Ssr \ \ - •as NO. 100 O 11 S2 .J CIO \ 4 ` \ / a � / - 1 / �f a � + , / � 1692on 1r a7 ii � / -t ;�� E 0 120 240 1D - t SCALE FEET P z av f d LOCKI / N o E / a LOT 3, \\ l ` \� ` - 29.510d / BLOCK A� a� 11 �/ R EXISTING \ \ \' r'i •�T': ✓/ ��� o I s,00o sf/ BUILDING: Walmart: ° q 'LOT SHOPS c 0 \\ \ STORE #5625 -00 / �� E 0 \ o \ CA 80- SGL -NO 10 1 n \ n 181,943 S.F. (APPROX.) / l \ EXISTING SEARS \ / 1 Lf a TIN \ CON -ACTT �' 1 \ 1 \ STORMWATER J / / �P [� w W a \\ \\ OUTLOTA / / ��`�� SITE DATA TABLE _ d Ul d' 1 / / \\ \ / / j / 9 BUILDING DESIGNATION LOT AREA BUILDING PARKINGREQ'D PARKING PROVIDED ADAREO'D ADA PARKING RATIO LJ Z / WALMART LOT7, BLOCK 1 18.05 ACRES 181,943 SO. FT.. 819 SPACES 890 SPACES 17 SPACES 21 SPACES 4.89 BUILDING LOT 3, BLOCK 13.43 ACRES 150,591 SO. FT. 678 SPACES 678 SPACES 14 SPACES 14 SPACES 4.5D w APPLEBEES LOT 4, BLOCK 1 0.87 ACRES 4.869 SO. F(. 49 SPACES 54 SPACES 3 SPACES 3 SPACES 11.09 A LOT 6, BLOCK 1 1.28 ACRES 8,500 SQ. FT. 85 SPACES 85 SPACES 4 SPACES 4 SPACES MOD J B LOTS, BLOCKI 1.21 ACRES 9,100 S0. FT. 41 SPACES 41 SPACES 2 SPACES 3 SPACES 4.51 Q p / C LOT 11, BLOCK 1 1.44 ACRES 12,225 SO. FT. 55 SPACES 55 SPACES 3 SPACES 3 SPACES 4,50 LOT 12, BLOCK 1 0.61 ACRES 6,775 50. FF. 2BSPACES 31 SPACES 2 SPACES 2 SPACES 5.02 Q 0 55TH AVE N 7 / E LOT 13, BLOCK 1 12 % 8 ACRES T.8SQ. FT. 79 SPACES 79 SPACES 4 SPACES 4 SPACES 10.01 �^ W 2 / - F LOT I, BLOCK2 1.19ACRES 14,000 SQ. FT. 63SPACES 63SPACES 3SPACES 3SPACES 4.50 V w % - 1 G LOT 7, BLOCK 1 3.51 ACRES 45,000 SO. Fr.. 203 SPACES 204 SPACES 6 SPACES 7 SPACES 4.53 Z Z Z H LOT 9, BLOCK 1 1.10 ACRES 11,200 SO. FT. 51 SPACES 51 SPACES 3 SPACES 3 SPACES 4,55 LLI m W / J LOT S, BLOCK 0.70 ACRES 8,4005Q. Ff. 388PACE5 40 SPAC ES 2SPACES 2SPACES 4.76 U O 2 U \ / K LOT 10, BLOCK 7 7.19 ACRES 11,470 50. FT. 52 O SPACES 53 SPACES 3SPACES 3SPACES 4,85 N Z Q L LOT 74, BLOCK i 1.19 ACRES 70,920 SQ. Ft. 50 SPACES 53 SPACES 3 SPACES 3 SPACES 4.85 LL ul C,y ` • / M LOT 15, BLOCK 1 1.16 ACRES 7,475 SQ. F7. 75 SPACES 75 SPACES 4 SPACES 4 SPACES 10.03 J �I O O \ �' P LOT 17, BLOCK 1 2.70 ACRES 29,510 SO, FT. 133 SPACES 134 SPACES 5 SPACES 6 SPACES 4.54 Y Y / O LOT 16, BLOCK 1 2.88 ACRES 35,680 SQ. FF. 761 SPACES 764 SPACES 6 SPACES 6 SPACES 6,60 W O •'R LOT 2, BLOCK 1 0.71 ACRES 6,000 SO. Fr. 27 SPACES 30 SPACES 2 SPACES 2 SPACES 5.00 Qa O W o / OUTLOTA OUiLOTA 6.07 ACRES U m O } _ ROW DEDICATION COUNTY RD NO. 10 0.76 ACRES Z > - ROW DEDICATION STATE HYW W NO. 100 11.92 ACRES J ( / KOHL'S LOT 2, BLOCK 6.83 ACRES 75,000 50. Ff. 338 SPACES 447 SPACES 9SPACES 10 SPACES 5.% ( ` O Z O - - / TOTAL 80.88 ACRES 835,888 SQ. FT. 3227 SPACES 5.07 Z Z V J - THE CITY OWNED PARCEL (BUILDING H IS TO BE REPLATTEDAS INDICATED ON PLAN. d w - / PROPOSED SITE ACREAGE WILL BE 1.19ACRES. = 'n^ Z VJ Z "THESE LOTS WILL BE REPIATTED. W 3 DATE i PO 06/13 2011 PROJECT NO. E 160633001 EX -X o ��������������������\ ARCHITECTURAL a a a a CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North Third Street, Suite 220 612 -4364030 ///////////ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ/ZZ ZZ/Z — Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 61292 -9960 \ GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Key Plan a to a <= PHASE 2 - - -- Pam �,• �\ �' °' .a CAFE � i - � � Milli ' 1 ' a 5,064 SF 1 , - i 1 NORTH 1 i i PROPERTY 1 LINE TRY Mark Revision /Issue Date 64' 1 140' 108' 1 120' 40' -32 L " (TOILET S i�N I TENANT a 1 TENANT TENANT 1 E2 1 l E1 I ; I E3 a rz 1 I 18,128 SF 1 24,762 SF I , 21,360 SF TENANT 1 I t O N1 1 1 I 5,459 SF i i i 1 1 1 E• —CIE —� •) I SEARS 1 I , 60' -10" 1 I n , �'—— �' -------------------- --- - - --- ___ —� 26 o-" 13'3 "t CLEAR TO ______ —__ — 'r •� rvpvn IENTR % C y SERVICE CORRIDO= i m PROP. LINE - VERIFY T ---- ------ ` 1 'o __ - - -__ - __ - ----- �- -_ - -- ;----- - -,— — L L- ----------- -----,-- E TRY So' -3° 357 -�2" �� SHINGLE CREEK TENANT , 1 00 CROSSING 4,057 SF ' _J N 1 BROOKDALE CENTER ENTRY REDEVELOPMENT TENANT t O J o wt -� o BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 70,285 SF i J A o LEASING PLAN l ZIFF PROJECT NUMBER. 10- 1019 -OI ISSUED DATE: 06 -09 -11 r ( DRAYPI BY: BL CHECKED BY, KA y — �// � � GLA._ PROPERTY ENTRY 149,115 SF LINE ZX NORTH , A Q Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2010 7 EX15TINS SEARS PREFIN. MTL. COPIN5 EIFS GORNGE ILLUMINATED ARCHITECTURAL 5164AGE TENANT E3 TENANT E2 TENANT EI CONSORTIUM L.L.C. BACKLIT PREFIN. METAL FROSTED ILLLMINATED CORNICE N✓EW AWNIN6 NEW EIFS EMS -� _ 6LA65 EI 516NASE BRI ANiIN6 901 North Third Street, Suite 220 612 -0364030 v - - - Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 672-692 -9960 A ��9 tENANT I TENANT iN.EHC P REFIN. GANOPY�� v IM1 CD BRICK�� ONHI BASE Ib' -0' 9'-4' NEW BRICK BASE DL L�P1i1L!�� 1 � Iri' � Ml ll 1 �� ANOD.ALUM. CANVAS DECgRATIVE PREFIN. METAL ANOD. ALUM. GNU BASE STOREFRONT SO-0 AWNIN65 1-16HT CANOPY STOREFRONT T O 5EAR5 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION EIPS DecoRArlvE L16HT Key Plan PREFIN. METAL PAINTED CONTROL JOINTS ROCKFACE CMU - M�.ASTIVE f ' PREfIN. METAL TRASH GATES HM. DOOR 3 COLORS AHNINSS LIGHT PROPOSED SOUTH BACKLIT CORNICE 2 FROSTED GLASS 1 TENANT BRICK EIFS DECORATIVE NORTH LIGHT -- Mark Revision /Issue Date b PREFIN. METAL SIMAATED PAINTED BRICK PREFIN. OVERHEAD 4O' -0' EXI5TIN6 CANOPY PROP05ED AE5T ELEVATION STONE BASE H.M. DOOR DOORS TO DOCK BEYOND 5EAR5 O• - I • I COMPACTOR xx I I I I I ® • F� I �T I I x I j I x .................... ....................... .......: E SHINGLE CREEK 3 ® m �',1,y • m � � CROSSING m i� i Cn D x COMPACTOR -- _ x» BROOKDALE CENTER -1� REDEVELOPMENT ' � ROPERTY BROOKLYN CENTER, MN O n LINE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SEARS C m D x PROJECT NUMBER: 10- 1014 -0I (n ISSUED DATE: O&-0q-II m C44ECK BY: BL z � CHECKED BY, KA I I I I 0 J A2 -Q Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2010 Drawing name: K:\ This --1 IsgU" In (1 T Z 1 In a M < m X r 1 C Z r_ 0110 O Dz O� z0 --I cn '— M 0 n m A > z'm �m N o� �Mm O c x m r � 0 —{ D Z Z Z G) G) a 0E',EL0PMENT \8R00KDALE CENTER \CADD \EXHIBITS \SEARS - ALLEY.dwg EX -1 Jun 09, 2011 3:42pm by Trish.Pothe U.vg P senled —e I,, ss an ,nstrpmmt pl service, s mle — only .1 IM1e — 1,, —p... — cIi— for -.i it — p w red. R...< of — pope .<NUnc. yr � � z m SCALE BESICN ENGINEER: WILLIAM D. MATZEK � Kimley -Hom II SITE PLAN MCBIFICATICNE PER CITY CC MM ENTS 1-22-11 TDR 171 m oo SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SEARS IMPROVMENTS: BEBICNE]BY andMsociates,Inc. X m rr. w w CT °' BROOKLYN CENTER, MN NORTH SIDE URANJ BY MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NUMBER: ©1aNF KIMLEY_RORN ANa AssaclA Es. NG. 3 al O Z O C N CHECKED BY 1550 UNIVEF9TY AVENVE V£51. 9JITE 3JBN 6L. PAUL, MN 55114 PNaNE: B51- Bas -<19] FAX' 651 -615 -5110 A '',NE=PIN MINNE=SOTA DATE: www.NiMLLY- NOFNLaM Na. REVisorvs DATE eY Drawing name: K: \TWC_LDEV \GATLIN DEVELOPMENT \BROOKDALE CENTER \CADD\ PROPOSED \DROOK—PSI TE_N— par+ing7. dwg SEARS Jun 29, 2011 6:14pm by ju,;fl sirjord ., da­ e.� :gem ne2��. o� o� ,�.wm.m el :.m�a ,� ��r�„aea r , m� vP .o� o P a„a n,��r Pr<aa.�e. m�...an b, , 1 -1 11-111t, m K. v o am As oe — Ct' oo CD p � _4 D ,x �•Q V\ / / m / / o i \ 1 m OR D N m A C A c7 C � 0 tit z 0 A m 0 m D m N /�11 m 0 O 2 N r m ^ m U/ m m s Z O A S R v SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SHINGLE CREEK SCALE As OESi °NED R THAT THIS PL, T R HEREBY CETIFY EP ORT W PREP ARED BY ME °R AN SPECI -AION OR ° NDER Y DIRECT SIONALENGINE'� DER°HEY �AWSSOF �_❑ BROOKLYN CENTER ERoFE THE STATE OP M " NES °Tq aldA N w m D D r Z D O z D STORE #5625 -00 A D O Z O Tl m A � o Z D A O m ✓� O y Z Z O G o O z Z D 0 0 z 0 f N D ➢ > p D p O n rT n ➢ C A O l N m o O N N u N O O - O 0 D n y 0 y CDl p O A N N m Z O A S R v p cn m D D D co r m SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SHINGLE CREEK SCALE As OESi °NED R THAT THIS PL, T R HEREBY CETIFY EP ORT W PREP ARED BY ME °R AN SPECI -AION OR ° NDER Y DIRECT SIONALENGINE'� DER°HEY �AWSSOF �_❑ BROOKLYN CENTER ERoFE THE STATE OP M " NES °Tq aldA N w m CROSSING, PUD DRAWN BY d STORE #5625 -00 WILLIAM D. MATZEK, P.E. HENNEPIN COUNTY MIKNESOT� AM E N D M E NT 1 cnECK BDATE 06 ✓ 2011 INN uC. NO. 45790 "a. REVlsiovs p cn m D D D co r m / I / J 6 � 6 / ell I / Vn O A I t d a� S� .�a; o a S IN �� O � � d as 9� JsP, 0� O J as 6� r `nv , a s as c aJ' r ( \J� S3 Sr• ��J 0 �a14 ♦ ar r aS m v> J 6 �r � el �6 a tP •• S � a .� as 0� w� r �r i ♦ v , as r .♦ v? S 3a / ♦ J s I. •♦ m� �� o� o ••♦ � ♦ o��� 3a S S�� S / v wa6 e ♦ ; �� ��.�� � � °av� gaa a va ♦ �� ♦ t .t . , T' .1� � �� ♦ IN SdONS v MOOG •� •. . �1e *�► � ova4 j ♦ •fi I'• ` .♦ . 4 ♦♦ sYd ♦• l � s Y ds dY ON .10 ol dY / ' •• / � i ♦ �JY a 383 loe ♦ dB Jr ♦♦ de • JY a'8 • •• �`) y l �� 8 • ` ♦ ♦ m � dg A ♦ Op - -r %r - r r Portion of Food at, Court building encroachment N % ♦ r ` \Vo' LOT 2,♦ BLOCK 1 \ �\ ♦ TRACT C RLS NO L19 ZO\ \ ♦ 1469 \ as It aF N1WtIP \\ \ Y \ IN IN Cp Z � r / IN \ r�6r i Sears - � R A C T A uv_a1• s 4 �� RLS NO 936 QIWNERSHP: SEARS, / ROEBUCK AND CO. .�. \ \ r,. � 0.l 14Y -tl4C.W (SW". • Property Lines EIRE m—, J 11-44A UiV_y/46 J � \ r i 8, ) A / C+�w