Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1979 10-22 CCP Regular Session
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City of Brooklyn Center October 22, 1979 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Invocation 4. Approval of Minutes - October 15, 1979 5. Open Forum A 6. Performance Bond Release -Brooklyn Center Baptist Church, 5840 Humboldt Avenue North 7. Resolutions: a. Authorizing Execution of Contract for Work at Unity Avenue Culvert b. Accepting Bids for Purchase of Water Meters -Bids were received and opened on October 16, 1979. It is recommended that the quotation of the Badger Meter Company in the amount of $61,100.19 be accepted. C. Authorizing Equipment Rental for Central Park Grading Project d. Requesting Minnesota Department of Transportation to Conduct Speed Survey and Establish Speed Limit on Freeway Boulevard e. Accepting Proposal from Hickok Associates for On -Site Drainage Controls at Howe, Inc. f. Accepting Quotations for Purchase of Snowplow -It is recommended the quotation of Itasca Equipment Company in the amount of $3,819 be accepted. g. Commending Jan Daniels and Greg Brooks for Their Work as Detached Workers h. Authorizing'an Additional $20,000 in Funding for CEAP i. Giving Final Approval of Industrial Revenue Bond Proposal from LOGIS 8. Planning Commission Items (8:00 p.m.): a. Application No. 79062 submitted by Cinema I, II, III' -The applicant requests a variance from the sign ordinance to allow an off- site directional sign to continue at the common entrance to the A.F.I.A. and Cinema properties. Application No. 79062 was recommended for .approval at the October 11, 1979 Planning Commission meeting. 9. Ordinances: a. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 Regarding Setbacks from Major Thoroughfares - -The ordinance is recommended for a first reading. 10. Approval of Increases for Community Center Memberships and Admissions 11. Approval of Election Judges CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- October 22, 1979 12. Discussion Items: a. Inter- agency Special Investigation Squad b. T.H. 252 and T.H..610 Programming and Traffic Forecasts C. Request for Traffic Signal System at Brooklyn Boulevard (T.H. 152) at 65th Avenue d. Report on Request for Sidewalk on John Martin Drive e. Hennepin County Final 911 Plan f. Professional Staff Association Activities 13. Licenses 14. Adjournment MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION OCTOBER 15, 1979 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order by Mayor Dean Nyquist at'7:03 p.m, ROLL CALL Mayor Dean Nyquist, Councilmembers Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, .and Celia Scott. Also present was City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public Works Sy Knapp, Director of Finance Paul Holmlund, Director of Planning and Inspection Ron Warren, City Attorney Richard Schieffer, and Administrative Assistant Brad Hoffman. INVOCATION The invocation was offered by Father Lowry of St.. Alphonsus Church. APPROVAL OF MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 1979 There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Fignar to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting of September 24, 1979 as submitted. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unani- mously, OPEN FORUM Mayor Nyquist stated the Council had not received any requests to use the Open Forum session. He inquired of the audience if anyone was present who wished to address the Council. There being none, the Mayor proceeded with the regular agenda items. PERFORMANCE BOND RELEASES The City Manager introduced the performance bond releases as the next agenda item. He referred to a memorandum submitted to the Council by the Planning and Inspection office detailing each of the bond releases. The Director of Planning and Inspection noted that a $50,000 performance bond for First Wisconsin Mortgage Company was reduced by the City Council to $5,000 on June 23 of this year, following discussions with representatives of the First Wisconsin and the Moorwood Homeowners Association. The Association had requested a delay in the release of the bond because they and First Wisconsin had not completed a settlement regarding certain improvements. He stated that the two parties have reached an agreement and that First Wisconsin has requested the total release of the bond. Motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded by Councilmember Scott to release the performance bonds as recommended by City staff. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against none. The motion passed unanimously. SUBDIVISION BOND RELEASE The City Manager introduced the subdivision bond releases for the Irving Estates and Ewing Square. The Director of Public Works briefly reviewed the two subdivision releases. Councilmember Kuefler inquired if the staff was asking for a total release. The Director of Public Works indicated 10 -15 -79 -1- a that a total release was being sought. A brief discussion ensued relative to neighborhood problems with the Ewing Square project. The City Manager reported there had been few complaints in the neighborhood regarding "no parking" signs. Motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Fignar to approve the subdivision bond releases for Irving Estates and Ewing Square as recommended by the City staff. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Council - members Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. FINAL PLAT APPROVALS The Director of Public Works briefly reviewed the final plat approval for Piccadilly Ponds. A brief discussion ensued relative to a private road agreement. Motion by Councilmember Fignar and seconded by Councilmember Kuefler to approve the final plat approval for Piccadilly Ponds subject to a private road agreement as approved by the City Attorney and also conditioned upon the Minnesota Department of Highway approval of the road. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. The Director of Public Works briefly reviewed the final plat approval for the Rosen Addition. The Director of Planning and Inspection added that when two lots are held under common ownership and common usage, they are required b ordinance to be y combined. The Council requested the staff to write q a letter to the Pilgrim Cleaners commending them for cleaning u their corner g g g p on Brooklyn Boulevard. Motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to approve the final plat for Rosen Addition. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Council - members Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Nyquist indicated because of his professional involvement in the North- brook Alliance Addition he would abstain from the discussion and the vote. Mayor pro -tem Fignar assumed the chair. The Director of Public Works explained that the addition proposed the combining of various properties into one lot for a residential development. Motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to approve the Northbrook Alliance Addition final plat. Voting, in favor: Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed. Mayor Nyquist abstained from voting. APPROVAL OF ELECTION JUDGES Motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve the partial list of election judges for the November 6, 1979 general election. Following the motion, there was a brief discussion in which it was noted that six additional judges would be required. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against:, none. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -229 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoptions RESOLUTION TO CANCEL LEVY PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR 10 -15 -79 -2- The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -230 Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO CANCEL LEVY PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -231 Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE BROOKLYN CENTER HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO ADMINISTER BROOKLYN CENTER'S HOUSING REHABILITATION GRANT PROGRAM The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -232 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FORM (SIDEWALK CONTRACT 1979 -H) The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Gene Lhotka, -and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none,_ whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -233 Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79 -196 PROVIDING FOR WAGE AND SALARY ADJUSTMENT FOR THE CHIEF OF POLICE The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -234 Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF'ONE DATA PROCESSING TERMINAL FOR PROPERTY DATA SYSTEM 10 -15 -79 -3- The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -235 Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF PUBLIC SERVICE BY TRUMAN A. NELSON The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene r Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 79 -236 Member Gene Lhotka.introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING'TWE14TY -FIVE YEARS OF PUBLIC SERVICE BY RICHARD J. JENNRICH The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Following a brief discussion, there was a motion by Councilmember Fignar and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve the employee recognition program. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -237 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoptions. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF THREE PRESSURE DEMAND AIR MASKS WITH WALKWAY BRACKETS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -238 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF MICROFILM AND FICHE RFZIDER PRINTER The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 10 -15 -79 -4- RESOLUTION NO. 79 -239 Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE $70,000 IN THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND FOR THE SHINGLE CREEK RELOCATION PROJECT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -240 Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE $25,000 IN THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BROOKLANE PARK SHELTER BUILDING The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Gene Lhotka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -241 Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE $50,000 IN THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND AS THE CITY'S MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE CENTRAL PARK LAWCON PROJECT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -242 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: ` RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE $14,390 IN THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND AS THE CITY'S MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE SHINGLE CREEK TRAILWAY LAWCON PROJECT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted, in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -243 Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR INSTALLATION OF FUEL OIL TANK AT CITY HALL/CIVIC CENTER The motion for the adoption of,;:_'the. foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene 10 -15 -79 -5- Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -244 Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REPLACEMENT OF PRIVATE DRIVEWAY The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof; Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BROCHURE The City Manager introduced the next agenda item stating the Chamber of Commerce was requesting $1,500 from the City for the printing of a promotional brochure for the City of Brooklyn Center. Lonni McCauley, from the Chamber of Commerce, explained that the piece would be used to promote the City and would be used by realtors, hotels, restaurants and so forth. She also explained that the example received by the Council would include a four page colored brochure with an insert map. She also indicated it is possible a gatefold would be included which would allow for more information to.be printed. Councilmember Fignar inquired as to the timetable for completion of the brochure. Ms. McCauley indicated she thought it should be available by the end of the year. The City Manager explained the City needed approval from the Council for the expenditure from the City's Contingency Fund. Motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Fignar to approve the expenditure of $1,500 for the promotional brochure to be taken from the City's Contingency Fund. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. ORDINANCES The City Manager introduced the first ordinance noting that it was an amend - ment to Chapter 35 regarding special requirements in I-1 and I -2 districts. He noted that the ordinance was first read at the September 10, 1979 Council meeting, published on September 27, 1979 and was presented this evening for a second reading. This ordinance related to changes in the various setbacks in I -1 and I -2 districts. ORDINANCE NO. 79 -16 Member Celia Scott introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 REGARDING SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS IN I -1 AND I -2 DISTRICTS The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said ordinance was duly passed and adopted. The City Manager introduced the next ordinance vacating an alley lying between Emerson and Fremont Avenues North between 56th and 57th Avenues North. The City Manager noted that the ordinance was first read at the September 10, 1979 Council meeting, published on September 27, 1979 and was being presented this evening for a'second reading. 10 -15 -79 -6- ORDINANCE NO. 79 -17 Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: AN ORDINANCE VACATING AN ALLEY LYING BETWEEN EMERSON AND FREMONT AVENUES NORTH BETWEEN 56TH AND 57TH AVENUES NORTH The motion, for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott.; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted. REPORT ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS The City Manager referred to a memorandum from Tom Bublitz, Administrative Assistant. The memorandum referred to the benefits received by Ms. Melba Evanson's property as a result of the installation of the street, storm sewer, and sanitary sewer and water main in Projects No. 1978 -21, 1978 -22, 1978 -23 and 1978 -24. It also referred to the benefits received from the Brookdale Towers property along the newly constructed Irving Avenue from Grading, Base & Surfacing Project No. 1978 -20. The City Manager recommended that the Council accept the memo into the record. Motion by Councilmember Fignar and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to accept the memorandum prepared by Tom Bublitz into the records of the special assessment hearing. Voting in favor:' Mayor Nyquist, Council- members Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. RECESS The City Council recessed at 7:50 p.m. and reconvened at 8:12 p.m. INDUSTRIAL REVENUE PUBLIC HEARING The City Manager introduced the next agenda item by stating that Cass Screw Company was requesting an industrial revenue bond for the expansion of their company. He added that they were seeking preliminary approval of that project from the City this evening. Mayor Nyquist then called the public hearing to order. Administrative Assistant Brad Hoffman noted that notice of the public hearing had been published in the Brooklyn Center Post on September 27 and in the Minneapolis Star & Tribune on September 28 and that such publication dates were in compliance with the State law. He also added that Cass Screw Company was seeking a $650,000 industrial revenue bond. Mayor Nyquist then recognized Richard Palmiter. Mr. Palmiter indicated that he represented Rothschild Financial Corporation which was the authorized representative for Wise, Greenwald & Greenwald, a Minnesota partnership owning the Cass Screw Company. He indicated that the project was for the acquisition and expansion of the ' company. He indicated that the company was presently operating from two buildings and that under the project it was proposed to combine the two at one site. Councilmember Lhotka asked Mr. Palmiter how the proposed project would meet the City's guidelines. Mr. Palmiter described the company's back- ground that being a long -term Brooklyn Center company and their need for financing. He also indicated that it was feasible that the Cass Screw Company would be forced to leave Brooklyn Center if they were not able to find financing for the development on that site. He also added that expan- sion would create other jobs. Councilmember Fignar inquired as to the number of additional jobs that would result from the expansion of the company. Mr. Greenwald, of the Cass Screw Company, indicated that he did not have an exact figure but estimated the number would be. around ten. Councilmember 10 -15 -79 -7- Lhotka inquired as to the number of current employees that resided within Brooklyn Center. Mr. Greenwald indicated that he was not exactly sure but he added that he was a resident of Brooklyn Center and indicated that he would guess approximately 20 of his 50 employees were Brooklyn Center residents. Motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to close the public hearing. Voting in favor Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Nyquist inquired if there was any further discussion. Councilmember Kuefler inquired as to the amount of industrial revenue bond money the City has given tentative approval to at this point in time. Administrative Assistant Brad Hoffman indicated that the City has given preliminary approval to industrial revenue bonds of $800,000 for LOGIS, $1,000,000 for Medtronics and $1,400,000 for the Dale Tile Company. He also added that the LOGIS bond was according to Council direction and was not to count against the 50 of the City's assessed valuation limit the City had adopted as a policy for industrial revenue bonds. In total he indicated that $2.4 million of that money had been used at this point in time. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -245 Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BY WISE, GREENWALD & GREENWALD UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOP- MENT ACT, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR APPROVAL THEREOF AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF'DOCUMENT AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. d HOUSING INSPECTION ORDINANCE The City Manager introduced the next agenda item by referring to a memorandum prepared by Administrative Assistant Brad Hoffman. He noted that the Brooklyn Center Housing Commission has been working on a mandatory housing inspection ordinance that would require all homes to undergo an inspection prior to their sale. Councilmember Fignar added that it was the intent to get direction from the full Council. He indicated that the Commission has been studying the housing inspection ordinances for approximately a year and has had discus- sions with both representatives from the City of Minneapolis and St. Louis Park which represented the two basic approaches to housing inspection ordi- nances. Mayor Nyquist indicated that he had strong reservations against such a program. Councilmember Lhotka indicated that the Minneapolis approach bothered him considerably. He felt that there are a number of problems with their approach. Mayor Nyquist also indicated that he had some concerns about the City's liability under the program. The City Manager added that although the City administration was proposing that the program, if adopted, be administered similarly to the way electrical inspections are handled, that there would still be some administrative burden in that department associated with the ordinance. Councilmember Fignar inquired if New Hope had such an ordinance. Administrative Assistant Brad Hoffman indicated that they 10 -15 -79 -8- do have an ordinance and that it had been patterned after St. Louis Park's program. Mayor Nyquist then recognized Ray Haroldson from the Housing Commission. Ray Haroldson indicated that it was the desire on the part of the Commission to help inform buyers about the homes.they were about to purchase. He indicated that most home buyers were unaware or uninformed purchasers. He also added that it is perhaps the most significant purchase most individuals would make and that such an ordinance would make that transaction easier for them. He also indicated that realtors felt that such an ordinance made the homes more sellable. He added that the compli- ance aspects of it only dealt with health and safety items. He stated the average person is unaware of all the fine points in purchasing homes. Councilmember Fignar indicated that it was not a guarantee but he also felt that many home buyers were uninformed. The City Manager stated that if the - inspectors were to find violations, they would be required to issue a citation for compliance because it is an ordinance being enforced and enforcement is not optional. Councilmember Kuefler inquired as to who the main advocates for the ordinance were. Councilmember Fignar then indicated that realtors and so forth advocated such ordinances. Councilmember Kuefler indicated he would like to see the Commission present the pros and cons and to make a recommenda- tion to the Council. He indicated that they should hold a public hearing to get public input on the matter. Following that, he felt they should bring the matter back to the Council at that time. The City Attorney stated that he felt the Council should be aware that code violations for the most part have been determined by courts to be for the general protection of societies and not individuals. He cited two court cases which have upheld that approach. However, he noted that the last supreme court decision was split and he indi- cated that if municipalities continue to pass such ordinances, and become more deeply involved in providing these kind of services that the courts are bound to rule that the City's inspection is an insurance policy for the individual. He added that if that does happen or when it does happen, that the costs associated with the enforcement of the ordinances will be astronomical. He also stated that if a violation is found, it must be corrected.- He stated that the St. Louis Park approach places a great burden upon the City. Mayor Nyquist then recognized Dolores Hastings from the Housing Commission. Dolores Hastings indicated that she feels the ordinance is similar to the Housing Maintenance Ordinance and that people would appreciate the ordinance after it has been passed but not prior to it. Councilmember Kuefler then stated that it would be another fee that would be passed along on the cost of the house. He also stated that FHA and GI mortgages require an inspection. Following the discussion, Councilmember Fignar stated that he would take the Council's input back to the Housing Commission for further study. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS The City Manager introduced the next agenda item, that of Planning Commission Application Nos. 79057 and 79058 submitted by Medtronics, Inc. He stated that the applicant was seeking a site and building plan approval for an addition to their building at 6700 Shingle Creek Parkway. He also added that the Planning Commission had recommended approval for the application at the September 25, 1979 Planning Commission meeting. He also added that Applica- tion No. 79058 sought the Council's approval of a registered land survey at the site of their building at 6700 Shingle Creek Parkway. The Director of Planning and Inspection stated that the applicant was seeking a site and building and a registered land survey approval for a 53,000 square foot addition to the existing Medtronics facility. He explained that the site included Tracts C and D of registered land survey 1316 bounded on the 'west by a Speculative Industrial Building No. VI, on the north and by Shingle Creek Parkway on the west, by 67th Avenue on the south and by Hiawatha Rubber and 10 -15 -79 -9- Earle Brown Farm Apartments on the north. He added that land was zoned I -1 and that the research and the development used for the proposed addi- tion is consistent with the existing use approved-by the -City Council. The Director of Planning and Inspection pointed out that the two tracts were roughly nine acres in total and were divided from east to west by a 40 foot utility easement located in the area of the existing property line. Access to the site is gained by a curb cut off 67th Avenue and a single curb cut without a median cut off Shingle Creek Parkway. He stated that the new building addition would utilize the area between the existing Medtronic building and the utility easement which is presently used for parking. The Director of Planning and Inspection explained that the utility easement will be moved northward approximately 15 feet and that the applicant proposes to relocate an existing water main to allow for the expansion. The Director of Planning and Inspection reviewed the landscape plan for the site pointing out that the plan provides for a six foot high berm on the northeast corner to shield the parking lot from the residential uses to the east. He indicated that he felt it would be more attractive and more practical than a screened fence. A four foot high berm is proposed along the Shingle Creek Parkway. He reviewed the planting for the site which would `include honey locusts, green ash, maple and little leaf lindens. He stated that all unpaved areas are proposed to be sodded and sprinkled with the exception of a future building site which is to be seeded only. The applicant is request- ing a deferral of landscaping this area for period of two years. He added that drainage from the site is generally from the south and west and added that the contractor proposes to salvage and reuse the existing storm and sanitary sewer utilities presently under the new building site. Relative to the relocation of the 40 foot utility asement through the middle Y g of the site, the Director of Planning and Inspection explained that the appli- cant had chosen to relocate the water line rather than scale down the building which was the other alternative. He added that as a condition of approval, approval of sidewalk, which will be located over the same easement, should be extended to the existing, sidewalk on Shingle Creek Parkway. d The Director of Planning and Inspection pointed out on the "plan the location of the proposed lithium storage on the east side of the site. He also noted that the proposed area for the storage tanks for nitrogen are going to be filled by trucks entering off the Shingle Creek Parkway and that such deliveries will occur approximately every six weeks. He indicated that the Fire Chief had reviewed those plans for storage of the chemicals and reported that it was consistent with the requirements for storing such chemicals. The Director of Planning and Inspection indicated that the Planning Com- mission recommended approval for Application No. 79057 with thirteen contingen- cies. He also stated that approval for the registered land survey, Application No. 79058, was recommended for approval with four contingencies. " Councilmember Kuefler then inquired if the parking was on the south end of the building as is currently in existence. The Director of Planning and Inspection indicated that it was. Councilmember Lhotka expressed his concern for the storage of volatile chemicals. He indicated that he would like to see further information. The Director of Planning and Inspection indicated that Medtronic has submitted a list of chemicals used by the company and that the list is on file with the City as well as the Fire Chief's report on the storage of such chemicals. The City Manager indicated the Fire Chief's - reports would be made available to Council members and that Medtronics has 10 -15 -79 -10- always been very cooperative with the City in the past and that he foresees no problems with the design safety features of the storage of such chemicals at the Medtronics facility. Councilmember Fignar inquired as to the hours of operation. The representative from Medtronics indicated there were two shifts running from 6 :00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m. Councilmember Fignar then indicated his concern that the parking lot to the north might bother the apartment dwellers there. p r . The representative from Medtronics indicated the northern end of the parking lot would not be lit and that the company was using directional low standard lights. The Director of Planning and Inspection added that the City's Zoning Ordinance requires that there be no spillover of lights in such parking lots. Motion by Councilmember Fignar and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve Planning Commission Application No. 79057 subject to the thirteen conditions outlined by the Planning Commission. Voting in favor: -Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Nyquist opened the public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 79058. There was no one to speak at the public hearing. Motion by Councilmember Fignar and seconded by Councilmember Kuefler to close the public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 79058. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Co Y Yq u n cilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott.. Voting against none. The motion passed unanimously. Motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka to approve Planning Commission Application No. 79058 subject to the four conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Voting in favors Mayor Nyquist,,Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. LICENSES Motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve the following list of licenses: ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE Karen Youngberg 5419 Girard Ave. No. Earle Brown P.T.A. (Carnival - Country Store) James McAlpin 6248 71st Ave. No, Knights of Columbus (pancake breakfast) RENTAL DWELLING LICENSE Initial: Thomas & Mary Harty 5837 Lyndale Ave. No. Don Pfau 6913 Unity Ave. No. Danial Bartus 3500 66th Ave. No. Renewal: David Jensen & Gordon Wellens 5501 Brooklyn Blvd. Thomas & Bill Howe 3129 49th Ave. No. SIGN HANGER'S LICENSE Kaufman Outdoor Advertising Co. 315 Washington Ave. No. 10 -15 -79 -11- Voting in .favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. Motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded by Councilmember Scott to direct the staff to draw up resolutions commending detached workers Jan Daniels and Greg Brooks for the services they have provided the City of Brooklyn Center. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilmember Fignar and seconded by Councilmember Scott to adjourn the meeting. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 9:17 p.m. Clerk Mayor d 10 -15 -79 -12- Le MEMORANDUM TO: Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning nd Inspection 9 P FROM: Will Dahn, Building Official SUBJECT: Release of Perform ance'Bond DATE: October 17, 1979 Brooklyn Center Baptist Church 5840 Humboldt Avenue North Planning Commission File No. 77032 Amount of Guarantee - $1,000.00 Cash Escrow All concrete curbing, asphalt paving and patching and sodding of boulevard on 59th Avenue and Humboldt Avenue have been accomplished per approved site plans. Recommend total release of Cash Escrow. Approved b • „ Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection CITY OF 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 BYROOKLYN TELEPHONE 561 -5440 CENTER EMERGENCY- POLICE -FIRE 561 -5720 TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works DATE: October 22, 1979 RE: Spry of Quotations Received for Heavy Fa_,uipment Rental for Central Park Grading Project Total $ /Hour 14 -20 Cu. Yd. "D-7" Sized for 2 Scrapers Contractor Scr apers Dozer & 1 Dozer U. D. Contracting $60.00 /hour /ea $65.00 /hour $185 /hour Park Construction $66,75 /hour /ea $72.50 /hour $206 /hour C. S. McCrossan $70.00 /hDur /ea $58.00 /hour $198 /hour Accordingly, I recommend we accept the quotation of U. D. Contracting. Sy APP cb .,7 So xet"q« Now Member introduced the following resolution and rmved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT FORM - (FURNISHING AND DELIVERY OF COLD WATER METERS) -- W MEAS, the City Clerk and the Director of Public Works have reported that on October 16, 1979, at 11:00 A.M., Central Daylight Time, they opened and tabulated bids received for Furnishing and Delivery of Cold Water Meters, and that said bids were as follows: Bidder Total Amount of Bid Total Amount of Bid Alternate A + Base Alternate B + Base Bid -- Trade -In Bid-- Trade -In Allowance Allowance Badger Meter, Inc. Milwaukee, WI $61,100.19 $71,405.59 Davies Water Equipment Co. No Bid $76,154.78 Minneapolis, MN WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Director of Public Works to the satisfaction of the City Council that the bid of Badger Meter, Inc., is the best bid submitted. NOW, TfflMUORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the bid of Badger Meter, Inc., in the amount of $61,100.19, as to furnishing of all labor,materials, tools, and equipment in connection with the above mentioned improvement project according to the specifi- cations therefore now on file in the office of the City Clerk, is deemed to be the best bid submitted for said work by a responsible bidder, and said bid is hereby accepted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute a contract with said bidder. Date Mayor A=T: Clerk The notion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. - a . CITY OF 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 ROOKLYN TELEPHONE 561 -5440 CENTER EMERGENCY -POLICE -FIRE 561-5720 TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Sy app, Director of Public Works DATE: October 18, 1979 RE: Bids Received for Water Meters Bids were received and opened on October 16 for the furnishing of water.meters for the year 1980 in accordance with specifications prepared by this office, and pursuant to advertisements for bids published in the Brooklyn Center Post and in the Construction Bulletin. Tv+o companies submitted bids as follows: Conpany: Badger Meter, Inc. Davies Water Equip. Co. Milwaukee, WI Minneapolis, MN Base Bid (this includes $24,491.49 $23,929.48 primarily the large meters - -2" and over) Alternate bid A (this $41,148.70 No bid is for small meters with a plastic casing) Alternate bid B (this $50,454.10 $56,600.30 is for small meters with bronze casing) Trade -In Allowances $ 4,540.00 $ 4,375.00 Total Amount of Bid, $61,100.19 No bid Alternate A + Base Bid- Trade -In Allowance Total Amount of Bid, $70,405.59 $76,154.78 Alternate B + Base Bid- Trade -In Allowance (1) Badger also submitted an alternate bid of 23 221.11 for cast g $ , iron meters in lieu of bronze. This does not meet the specifi- cations. Meno to Gerald G. Splinter Page 2 of 2 Pages October 18, 1979 (2) Badger also submitted alternate bids of $41,503.70 (Alt. A) and $51,809.10 (Alt. B) if remote reading devices are purchased separately from the water meters. 'There is no reason to pay this additional cost. Incite Water Products Cmipaply of Eden Prairie, Minnesota, submitted the attached letter. Please be advised that I discussed this matter with their representative, Mr. Jim Henry. Mr. Henry agreed that so long as we are satisfied with plastic meters, there is no way their company could conpete with the prices we received- - and that Badger's prices are very competitive. Cap Smith expresses complete satisfaction with the performance of plastic meters, in particular with the Badger meters which we have beer, purchasing for the past three years. Accordingly, I recomTend award of the contract to Badger Meter, Inc. A resolution for this purpose is attached for consideration by the City Council. Respectfully Submitted, Sy &Iapg cb cc: Cap Smith Al Lindman Attachments o pucr S �, E 1 ,Q > 15801 WEST 78TH ST. EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 PHONE: (612) 941.6366 October 15, 1979 City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55429 Gentlemen: Thank you for the opportunity to review the provisions and specifications for furnishing cold water meters to the City of Brooklyn Center. We are not qualified to submit a proposal under the terms of your specifi- cations as written since we handle the Rockwell water meter in this area and our review of your specifications would indicate that there is only one company qualified to furnish these materials. Unfortunately we are not that company. Please keep us on the bidders list, on future bids in the event that there is a change in your specifications. Sincere r RICH RD E. HOLTZ Vi President REH /bh enc. P yw Rockwell 1 W aterous International Ak - �V Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE RIIVTAL OF TANDEM TRUCKS FOR HAULING OF MATER IN CONJUNCTION WITH CENTRAL PARK SITE GRADING PROJECT NO. 1978 - WHFREAS, Chapter 471.345 of the Minnesota Statutes provides for the purchase of merchandise, materials, or equipment, or any kind of construction work by informal quotations when the airount of such contract is less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000); and VAS, the City Manager has obtained quotations on the rental of trucks for utilization on Central Park Site Grad' Project No. 1978 -41 and has determined that the quotations of U. D. Contracting Company and the bid of Steere and Boone, Inc., each in the amount of $26.00 per hour are the best quotations submitted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the City Manager is authorized to contract for the rental Hof tandem trucks for utilization on Central Park Site Grading Project No. 1978 -41 at the rate of $26.00 per hour from U. D. Contracting Company, and /or from Steere and Boone, Inca Selection between the two firms shall be as equal as possible, considering availability of trucks. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RFSDLunm ND. RESoimiON AUTHOmiw THE Ra:m OF HEAVY EQLumosyr iN" t7C T LWTION WITH CENTRAL PARK SITE GRADING PRO� NO. 1978 -41 WHEREAS, Chapter 471.345 of the Minnesota Statutes provides for the Purchase of merchandise, materials, or equipment, or any kind of construction work by informal quotations when the amount of such contract is less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000); and WIZREAS, the City Manager has obtained quotations on the rental of heavy equipment fcr utilization on Central Park Site Grading Project No. 1978 - 41 and has determined that the quotations of U. D. Contracting CmTany at the follow ing prices: Description Rental Rate E2E hour 14-20 Cu. Yd. Scrapers $60.00 hour "D -7" Dozer $65.00 /hour is the best quotation submitted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the City Manager is authorized to contract for the .rental of said heavy equipment for utilization on Central Park Site Grading Project No. 1978 -41 at the rates shown above. Date Ma Zl ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 4 CITY - OF 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 B ROOKLYN TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C ENTER EMERGENCY- POLICE -FIRE 561 -5720 m: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works DATE: October 18, 1979 RE: Equipment Rental for Central Park Grading Project It is necessary to authorize additional truck rental to camplete the grading of Central Park. Accordingly, the following quotations were received: U.D. Contracting $26.00 /hour Steere & Boone, Inc. $26.00 /hour Minder Johnson $28.00 /hour I recommend accepting the proposals of the tuo low bidders, with selection to be made equally, considering availability of trucks. A resolution for that purpose is attached for consideration by the City Council. Also, we have now reached a stage where it would be advantageous to utilize scrapers to do some of the grading work. Accordingly, we are asking for quotations for this equipment and will attempt to have a recanmendation ready for Council consideration Monday night. Respectfully Suhmitted, Sy mPP cb Attachnent " ?!ce 5a�cet�ucg ?1l one �'itry,• Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. SOLUTION REQUESTING ESTABLISHMENT OF SPEED LIMIT ON FREEMY BOULEVARD BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation is hereby requested to conduct an engineering and traffic investigation and to authorize the erection of appropriate signs designating a reasonable and safe speed limit on Freeway Boulevard between Xerxes Avenue and Humboldt Avenue. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 BROOKLYN TELEPHONE 561 -5440 CENTER EMERGENCY- POLICE -FIRE 561.5720 TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Tebrks DATE: October 18, 1979 RE: Speed Limit on re yn Boulevard r5r e V) 0-k Minnesota Statutes (169.14, Subd. 2) provide that speed limits within "urban districts" shall be 30 mph and that speed limits in all other locations shall be 55 mph unless otherwise established by order of the Commissioner of Trans- portation. Urban districts are defined in MSA 169.01, Subd. 59, as meaning... "territory contiguous to and including any street which is built up with structures... at intervals of less than 100 feet for a distance of a quarter of a mile or more." MSA 1 .14 Subd. 5 provides that in local areas the local authorities may 69 P Y request the Coninissioner "to authorize, upon the basis of an engineering, and traffic investigation, the erection of appropriate signs designating_ what speed is reasonable and safe." Freeway Boulevard, between Xerxes and Humboldt Avenue, apparently does not meet the criteria of an urban district at this time. Accordingly, if we wish to have an enforceable speed limit lower than 55 mph, ue must request the Commissioner of NNDOI' to conduct the necessary investigation and to authorize erection of the appropriate speed limit signs. A resolution for this purpose is attached for consideration by the City Council. Respectfully Submitted, Sy P cb Attachment cc: Jim Lindsay, Police Chief Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: , RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUI'ION ACCEP'T'ING PROPOSAL FOR STUDY AND REPORT FOR ON -SITE DRAINAGE CEXTMIS AT HCWE, INC. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into contract with E. A. Hickok, Inc., for the conduct of a study and development of a report for on- -site drainage controls at Howe, Inc., in accordance with a proposal from said firm, at a cost of $2,376.00. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The notion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was .duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BiR OOKLYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C E NT ER EMERGENCY- POLICE -FIRE 561 -5720 TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FROM: Sy Knapp, Director of Public Works TYNE: October 18, 1979 RE: Recommendation to Employ Hickok Associates for Report on On -Site Drainage Controls at Howe, Inc. Attached, per your request, is a proposal from E. A. Hickok and Associates to conduct certain investigations regarding chemical storage control. The proposal covers two separate areas of investigation.., i.e.,: ! - those specific to establish of physical controls at Howe, Inc. the development of general guidelines applicable on a City -wide basis. After investigating the on -site conditions at Howe, Inc. and discussing! the everts which occured following the fire there last January, it is my opinion that develop ment and implementation of a plan for control of site runoff, with or without a disaster, should be a high priority item because: - during normal operations, the accumulation of chemicals on -site appears to be considerable, thereby resulting in a concentrated "first flush" runoff during normal rainfalls. - in the event of a spill or other or. -site disaster, there is now no way to prevent runoff into the established stow.? drainage system . without the use of extraordinary measures. Following the January fire, it was necessary to bulkhead the storm sewer both upstream and downstream from the Hovpe site. Fortunately, no heavy runoff occured last spring so that no serious problems resulted. Houever, with a heavy spring runoff, the City would have been forced to choose between: a) continuing to block the drainage system, resulting in severe flooding f man str o ties• or eam g y u F Pr• I� b) removing the bulkheads, thereby allowing the contaminated water to discharge into Ryan Creek, Shingle Creek, and. the Mississippi River. Accordingly; I recomnend im acceptance of the first part of the Hickok proposal. ` (i.e. Work Tasks l through 4). Mr. Wenck has advised that the cost for this portion of the study will be $2,376.00. Additional discussion and consideration can be given to the other portion of the proposal at a later date. "Ilse .a�oxet �l anc l� „ Mean to Gerald G. Splinter Page 2 of 2 Pages October 18, 1979 A resolution for consideration by the City Council is attached.. Respectfully Submitted, Sy KnaW cb cc: Ron Warren, Planning Director Tcm Heenan City Sanitarian Ron Boman, Fire Chief Attachment i cuye, Iu A. r'71GKOK dnu Hswcidtus, Inc. - PROPOSAL FOR SITE AND GUIDELINES INVESTIGATIONS CHEMICAL STORAGE CONTROL .. E. A. Hickok and Associates s 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 FOR City of Brooklyn Center < Eugene A. tticKOK ano Associaies,Tnc_ i STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING Based on our meeting tin of September 19, 1979 with Brooklyn Center officials, we understand the consultant is to: k 1. Perform engineering investigations of immediate physical controls for implementation at or near the site of Howe, Inca 2. Recommend guidelines for Municipal control of "hazardous" or "problem" materials storage with- in Municipal boundaries. Guidelines are expected to include definitions of applicability and of methods of Municipal control, which may include notification and planning requirements, performance j standards, or other controls. Guidelines are to be developed from a technical standpoint only and will require legal interpretation and modification prior to their adoption. ro' II. PROPOSED WORK PLAN The work described in our Statement of Understanding has been organized into eight (8) specific tasks, as outlined below. Task 1 - Howe, Inc. Site Review Task 2 - Design Criteria for Immediate Controls Task 3 - Disposal Options Review Task 4 - Report on Site Controls Task 5 - Review Ordinances and Codes Task 6 - Develop Guidelines for Municipal Control Task 7 - Preliminary Report on Guidelines Task 8 - Final Report on Guidelines The tasks are discussed in the following paragraphs. V TASK 1 - HOWE, INC. SITE REVIEW The Howe, Inc. site characteristics will be reviewed from existing plans. Possible runoff control points will be identified. Drainage areas and runoff coefficients will be determined. 1 Eugene..A. Hickok and Associates, Inc. d Y TASK 2 DESIGN CRITERIA FOR IMMEDIATE CONTROLS A rationale will be developed for specifying'a design -year storm as the basis for design of runoff controls. Design criteria will then be developed for specific runoff controls. TASK 3 - DISPOSAL OPTIONS REVIEW Methods for ultimate disposal of impounded runoff water, in the case.that such water is contaminated and unfit for discharge to natural waters, will be reviewed. One or more disposal methods will be recommended. TASK 4 REPORT ON SITE CONTROLS A report will be prepared to present the results of Tasks 1 through 3. The report will concisely describe the design criteria and recommended disposal options for the Howe, Inc, site. TASK 5 - REVIEW OF ORDINANCES AND CODES It is envisioned that Municipal control of "hazardous" or "problem" materials storage will have a primary basis in Ordinances and Codes, and may be further elaborated in less formal "standards" or "operating guidelines." Therefore, the existing Ordinances and Codes of Brooklyn Center will be reviewed with the City Attorney to determine their adequacy or short- comings as a basis for Municipal control. Contact will also be made with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Inter- - County Council, and the League of Municipalities. TASK 6 - DEVELOP GUIDELINES FOR MUNICIPAL CONTROL Based on the Task 5 review and technical considerations, "operating guidelines" or "standards" will be developed for the City. These will include proposed definitions of the applicability of the guidelines (which may be based on particular substances and their amounts stored) and of performance standards or other requirements. If existing Ordinances or Codes are inadequate as a basis for implemen- ting the proposed guidelines, additions to Ordinances or Codes may also be proposed. TASK 7 - PRELIMINARY REPORT ON GUIDELINES A report presenting the findings and recommendations of Tasks 5 and 6 will be prepared as a preliminary draft. It is anticipated that a thorough review by City staff and officials will result in extensive revision of this draft report. 2 i Eugene A. Hickok and Associates, Inc. TASK 8 FINAL REPORT ON GUIDELINES Revisions comments and answers to questions arising from the City's review of the draft report will be incorporated into a final report on guidelines. This "two- step production of the report on guidelines is proposed because of the immense technical and legal complexity associated with the control of hazardous materials. III. SCHEDULE The Proposed Work Plan will result in submittal of three (3) reports to the City of Brooklyn Center. The schedule for completion of these reports is proposed to be as follows: REPORT COMPLETION Report on Site Controls Two (2) weeks after Notice To Proceed , Preliminary Report on Eight (8) weeks after Notice Guidelines To Proceed Final Report on Guidelines Two (2) weeks after completion of City's review I RV. COST The total estimated fee for the professional engineering services described in this work plan is $5,800 based on our regular fee schedule which you have on file. i 3 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) HYDRAULIC REVERSIBLE TRIP SNOWPLOW - WHEREAS, Chapter 471.345 of the Minnesota Statutes provides for the purchase of merchandise, materials or equipment, or any kind of construction work by informal quotations when the amount of such contract is less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000); and WHEREAS, the City Manager has obtained quotations on the purchase of one (1) hydraulic reversible trip snowplow and has determined that the quotation of Itasca Equipment Company in the amount of $3,819.00 for 1 Wausau model R4511HR snowplow with trade -in of 1 flink model 89LP snowplow is the best quotation submitted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the City Manager be authorized to contract for the purchase of one (1) hydraulic reversible trip snowplow in the amount of $3,819.00 from Itasca Equipment Company. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. QUOTATIONS FOR SNOWPLOW WITH TRADE -IN Itasca Equipment Company $3,819.00 MacQueen Equipment Company $4,360.00 Hayden Murphy Equipment Company $4,769.00 v Member introduced the _following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION FOR THE OUTSTANDING WORK OF JAN DANIELS AND GREG BROOKS WHEREAS, Jan Daniels and Greg Brooks were employed as Detached Workers in the Metropolitan Minneapolis YMCA's Detached Worker Program since 1975 and 1977 respectively; and WHEREAS, Jan Daniels and Greg Brooks worked to assist youth in finding and.living a life -style acceptable to themselves and the society in which they live; and WHEREAS, Jan Daniels and Greg Brooks have provided outstanding service to the youth and families of the City of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, Jan Daniels and Greg Brooks have demonstrated an exceptional commitment to the problems of youth and their families. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that: The dedicated work of Jan Daniels and Greg Brooks as Detached Workers is recognized and appreciated by the City of Brooklyn Center. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk .The motion for the adoption of the foregoing o n resolution P n was duly q g y b member Y and upon p vote being aken thereon the following g � g voted in favor thereof- and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. � 1 Member introduced the following resolution / and moved its adoption:, ((( 66 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND THE COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INCORPORATED FOR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES WHEREAS, the Community Emergency Assistance Program provides assistance to those needy Brooklyn Center residents in obtaining social services through referral to other agencies; and WHEREAS, Community Emergency Assistance Program provides food, clothing, shelter and household staples on an emergency basis to those Brooklyn Center residents in need; and WHEREAS, the Community Emergency Assistance Program provides assistance to the elderly and handicapped and other persons in similar circumstances with needed services including home chore services; transportation for such essentials as grocery shopping; minor appliances; auto and home repairs; housekeeping, babysitting; visitation programs; meals at the door services; health services such as blood pressure screening, diabetic screening, glaucoma screening and other similar services; emergency housing for those in need and a battered women program; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center has determined that the services provided by CEAP are a benefit to the residents of the City of Brooklyn Center: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. the City of Brooklyn Center enter into a five (5) year contract with the Community Emergency Assistance Program, Inc. for the provision of services for the residents of Brooklyn Center; 2. an amount of $135,000 be allocated for the payment of such services; 3. payment in .full for the services to be provided by the Community Emergency Assistance Program, Inc. be made upon completion of their building; 4. payment be made to the Community Emergency Assistance Program, Inc for the services to be provided by CEAP, Inc. to the City of Brooklyn Center; 5. the City shall receive an annual financial report from the Community Emergency Assistance Program, Inc. during the term of the contract; 6. the terms and conditions set forth in the agreement will not be reconsidered by the Council during the life of the contract. RESOLUTION NO. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following_ voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against "the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. f f AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER and COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, INC. -- This Agreement is made this day of 1979 between the City of Brooklyn Center, hereinafter referred to as the City, and the Community Emergency Assistance Program, Inc., herein- after referred to as CEAP; In consideration of the covenants set forth herein, the City and CEAP agree as follows: Services Provided CEAP agrees to provide its full range of services to-residents of the City, including, without limitation the following:' a Survival services such as food clothing, shelter and household staples in emergencies for those in need of such services b. Assistance to those in need of social services which may be provided through referral to other Social Agencies. In addition, CEAP agrees to provide emergency survival services as set forth in Subparagraph a hereof, during the time between client contact with CEAP and the receipt of services from the referral Social Agency. c. Assistance to the elderly, the handicapped, and to other persons in need, such assistance to include without limi- tation, home chore services; essential transportation for such matters as grocery shopping, medical care, dental needs, and similar purposes; minor automobile, appliance and home repairs; housekeeping services; baby sitting ser- vices; visitation programs;, meals at the door services; health services such as blood pressure screening, diabetes screening, glaucoma screening and other similar services; emergency housing for those in need. d. Emergency shelter and care service for battered women.' e. Such other services of a similar nature as may be assigned from time to time by the City Manager of the City. Limitations and Report CEAP shall not compete with the City or other Social Agencies by 'providing services which overlap with services provided by the City or other Social Agencies CEAP shall submit an annual report to the City outlining the services provided to the City during the preceding year. Liabilities The City shall not exercise any control, shall provide no directive or advise to, and shall not interfere with CEAP or its employees in the performance of the services required by this Contract. CEAP volunteers and employees shall not be considered employees of the City and shall be under the direct control of CEAP. CEAP agrees to indemnify the City and hold the City harmless from any liability, claim, demand or action of any kind arising out of CEAP activities, and CEAP shall carry a policy of comprehensive general liability in an amount approved by the City and shall name the City as an addition- al insured on such policy of insurance. Duration The services provided by CEAP hereunder shall commence on the day of 1979, and - continue for a period ,five (S) consecutive calendar years. It is understood between the-'parties that CEAP intends to continue to provide similar services after expira- tion of this Contract, as a volunteer organization. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed to mean that the City shall renew this -2- Contract in the event that CEAP continues to provide such services to the residents of the City of Brooklyn Center after expiration of this Contract. Pa ent. The City agrees to pay the sum of One Hundred Thirty -five Thousand.($135,000.00) Dollars for the services provided hereunder, for the five -year term of the Contract. The sum of $135,000.00 shall be the total obligation of the City under this Contract and shall be payable to CEAP at such time as CEAP establishes a need for such funds in order to provide the services required hereunder. In the event that CEAP requires payment of the contract price in order to improve real estate for the purpose of providing the services CEAP shall provide Lo the City, a continuing lien against.said real estate. The continuing lien shall be in an amount obtained by dividing the number of days remaining under this Contract by 1825 days and express- ing the quotient in percentum and then multiplying the.. said percenturn times the total contract price. In the event that CEAP fails to pro- vide the services hereunder, discontinues its operation, or breaches the contract in any material way, CEAP shall refund to the City the amount determined by calculating the continuing lien as described herein, and in the event such amount is not refunded, the City shall have the right to foreclose the continuing lien by action as provided under Minnesota Statutes. Fire Loss In the event that CEAP is required to improve real estate as aforesaid in order to provide the services required hereunder, CEAP shall insure the improvements in the amount of at least $135,000.00 and shall name the City as a loss payee under the contract of insur- ance. In the event a fire occurs the City shall receive, as sole compensation for its rights under the loss payee clause, an amount -3- equal to the amount obtained under the "continuing lien" calculations set forth in the preceding paragraph. Miscellaneous The parties agree that this contract is not assign- able and that the contract shall become effective upon approval by the CEAP.Board of Directors and the execution thereof by the President and Secretary, and upon the approval by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center and execution thereof by'the Mayor and City Manager. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have - executed this Agreement on the date first above written. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER q Dean Nyquist, Mayor era Splinter, City Manager COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, INC. II I President Secretary -4- Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT UNDER THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT; AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS UNDER THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOP- MENT ACT TO FINANCE A PROJECT THEREUNDER, SECURED BY PAYMENTS TO BE RECEIVED PURSUANT TO A LOAN AGREEMENT AND A PLEDGE AND ASSIGNMENT OF THE CITY'S INTEREST IN THE LOAN AGREEMENT AND PAYMENTS THEREUNDER TO A TRUSTEE, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (the City), as follows: I Section 1. Authorization and Recitals. 1.01 General Authority. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended (the Act), to issue its revenue bonds and to make secured or unsecured loans to finance the acquisition or construction of buildings and improvements on such real property and the installation of machinery and equipment of any and all kinds and any other personal properties deemed necessary in connection with a project, as defined in the Act. 1.02 Proposed Project and Bonds. Representatives of Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Ekstrom, Inc. (the Original Purchaser), Minnesota Municipal Leasing Corporation (the Company), a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, and Local Govern- ment Information Systems (LOGIS), an organization of local government units formed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59 to provide data processing service to such units, have proposed that the City acting under and pursuant to the Act, issue and sell to the Original Purchaser, its $800,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Minnesota Municipal Leasing Corporation Project) (LOGIS, Lessee), Series 1979 (the Bonds) for the purpose of defraying the costs of a Project (the Project), consisting of the acquisition and installation of data processing equipment. Pursuant to the proposal the proceeds of the Bonds will be loaned by the City to the Company and the Company agrees to make pay- ments sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds. The Project will be leased by the Company to LOGIS pursuant to an Equipment Lease (as here- inafter defined). The City will assign its interest in the Loan Agreement (as` hereinafter defined) to a Trustee (as hereinafter defined). 1.03 Prior Approval. On April 9, 1979, this Council adopted a resolution giving preliminary approval to the Project and authorizing preparation of necessary documents. 1.04 Documentation. Forms of the following documents relating to the Project have been prepared and submitted to this Council and are hereby directed to be filed with the City Clerk: (a) a Loan Agreement (the Loan Agreement), to be dated as of September 1, 1979, proposed to be made and entered into between the City and the Company;. t RESOLUTION NO. (f) the financing of the Project, the issuance and sale of the Bonds in the principal amount of $800,000, the execution and delivery of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture and the Bond. Purchase Agreement, and the per- formance of all covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Loan Agreement, the Indenture and the Bond Purchase Agreement and of all other acts and things required under the Charter of the City and the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Bonds valid and binding obligations in accordance with-their terms, are authorized by the Act; (g) it is desirable that a series of industrial Development Revenue Bonds in the amount of $800,000 be issued by the City upon the terms set forth in the Indenture, under the provisions of which the City's interest in the Loan Agreement and the payments thereunder will be pledged to the Trustee as security for the payment of the principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds; (h) the loan payments contained in the Loan Agreement are fixed, and are required to be revised from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenue sufficient to provide for prompt payment of principal of and interest on all Bonds issued under the Indenture when due; and the Loan Agreement also provides that the Company is required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the Project, including, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance against all liability for injury to persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the Project and payable during the term of the Loan Agreement and, pursuant to the Security Agreement, the Company has granted a security interest in certain described facilities comprising the Project; (i) under the provisions of Section 474.10 of the Act and as provided in the Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from nor charged upon any funds of the City other than the revenue pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not subject to any liability thereon and no holders of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing powers of the City to pay any of the Bonds or the interest thereon nor to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City; the Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City except its interest in the Loan Agreement; each Bond issued under the Indenture shall recite that the Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof; and no Bond shall constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. Section 3. Authorization and Approval of the Project, Loan Agreement and Indenture. The City is hereby authorized to provide for the acquisition, construc- tion and equipment of the Project and pledge and assign the revenues therefrom and its interest in the Loan Agreement, all as provided in the Loan Agreement and the Indenture. The forms of Loan Agreement, Indenture, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents, Equipment Lease and Bond Purchase Agreement, referred to in Section 1.05, are approved subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the City Attorney and the Mayor, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by execution of the Loan Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement, the Indenture and the Bonds by the Mayor and _City Manager. The Mayor and City Manager are directed to execute the Loan Agreement upon ,execution RESOLUTION NO. (b) an Indenture of Trust (the Indenture), to be dated as of September 1, 1979, proposed to be made and entered into between the City and (the Trustee); (c) a Bond Purchase Agreement (the Bond Purchase Agreement) pro - posed to be executed by the Company, the City and the Original Purchaser; (d) a Security Agreement (the Security Agreement), to be dated as of September 1, 1979, proposed to be made and entered into between the Company and the Trustee; (e) an Assignment of Rents and Leases (the Assignment of Rents), to be dated as of September 1, 1979, proposed to be made and entered into between the Company and the Trustee; (f) an Equipment Lease (the Equipment Lease), to be dated as of September 1, 1979, proposed to be made and entered into between the .Company, as lessor, and LOGIS, as lessee; and (g) a Preliminary Official Statement, dated , 1979 (the Preliminary Official Statement). Section 2 Findings. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) the Project, as defined herein and in the Loan Agreement, constitutes a project authorized by Section 474.02, Subdivision la of the Act; (b) the purpose of the Project is and the effect thereof will be to promote the public welfare by encouraging the location, retention and development of economically sound industry and commerce within the City so as to prevent, so far as possible, the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; by promoting the use of available resources of the community thereby retaining the benefit of its existing investment in educational and public service facilities; by discouraging the movement of talented, educated personnel of mature age to other areas, thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; and by encouraging more intensive development of land available in the City to provide an adequate and better balanced tax base to finance the increase in the amount and cost of governmental services; (c) the Project is to be located in the City, at a site which is readily accessible to employees residing therein and in the surrounding community; (d) the Project when completed will increase the level of economic activity in the City, will increase the City's capability and the capability of each member of LOGIS,'of providing necessary governmental services, thus aiding and promoting development, which in turn will add the tax base of the City and overlapping taxing jurisditions; (e) the Project has been approved by the Commissioner of Securities of the State -of Minnesota, as tending to further the purposes and policies of the Act; RESOLUTION NO. thereof by the Company; the Bond Purchase Agreement upon execution thereof by the Company and the Original Purchaser; and the Indenture upon execution thereof by the Trustee. Copies of all of the documents shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided therein. The Mayor and City Manager are also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to the transaction herein contemplated. Section 4. Oficial Statement. The City hereby authorizes the use and distribution by the Original Purchaser of the Preliminary Official Statement and an Official Statement in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement, but with such modifications as are deemed appropriate and are approved by the City Attorney and the Mayor, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the issuance of the Bonds in offering the Bonds for sale to investors. The City has not participated in the preparation of the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement and has made no independent investigation with respect to the information contained therein, and the City assumes no responsibility for the sufficiency, accuracy or completeness of such information. Section 5. The Bonds; Terms Sale and Execution. 5.01 Authorization and Sale. In anticipation of the collection of ' revenues of the Project, the City shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds dated as of September 1, 1979, in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Indenture and this resolution. The Sale of the Bonds to the Original Purchaser at the price and upon the terms specified in the Bond Purchase Agreement is hereby approved. 5.02 Execution. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Bonds as prescribed herein and in the Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee, together with a certified copy of this resolu- tion, the other documents required in the Indenture, and such other certificates, documents and instruments as may be appropriate to effect the transaction herein contemplated. The Bonds shall be executed on behalf of the City by the facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager and sealed with a facsimile of the official seal of the City, and the coupons appertaining thereto executed by the facsimile signatures of such officers, and pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, the Trustee is hereby designated as as authenticating agent, and shall manually sign the Bonds. Section 6. Authentication of Proceedings. The Mayor and City Manager and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to furnish to the Original Purchaser and Bond Counsel certified copies of all proceedings and records of the- City relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officer's custody and control, or as other- wise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. RESOLUTION NO. Date Mayor ATTEST: Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REGULAR SESSION October 11, 1979 I. Call to Order: 7:30 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: September 27, 1979 4. Chairman's Explanation: The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions on these matters. 5. Cinema I, II, III 79062 Request for a variance from the Sign Ordinance to allow an off -site directional sign to continue at the common entrance to the A. F. I. A. and Cinema properties. 6. Discussion Items a. Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment dealing with setbacks from major thoroughfares. b. Rocky Rococo Proposed Entryway. c. Review of the revised Comprehensive Plan. 7. Other Business 8. Adjournment Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 79062 Applicant: David Maasch (Cinema I, II, III) Location: 5801 John Martin Drive Request: Sign Variance The applicant requests a variance from the Sign Ordinance to allow an existing directional sign to continue on the property owned by the American Family Insurance Association at 5901 John Martin Drive. The sign is located north of the entrance drive to the Cinema, the A. F. I. A. Building and Perkins on what was formerly Cinema I, II, III property. However, when the A.F.I.A. building was platted, the land on which the sign is located was transferred by B.C.I.P. to the A.F.I.A. site. As a result, the sign is now off. -site and, therefore, a billboard which is prohibited by the Sign Ordinance. `The A F. I. A Building now intends to erect a freestanding identification sign on the south side of the entrance drive. A condition of permitting any new signs is that all non - conforming signs on the site be removed. Hence, the application for a variance. The applicant has submitted "a letter (attached) with his application in which he argues: 1. That the removal of the sign would create a hardship because theater patrons might miss the entrance and have to drive along a very circuitous route to get back to the theater. 2. Since the entrance in question is the only point of access to the Cinema and to American Family Insurance; it is vital that directional signery adequately indicate this entrance as serving both developments. 3. The events leading up to the present nonconforming situation were beyond the control of the Cinema. 4. Granting of the variance will have no adverse impact on surrounding properties, but will benefit the general public by preventing u- turns on John Martin Drive and other confused traffic patterns. Section 34 -180 of the City Ordinances (attached) contains the standards for a sign ordinance variance. This section allows variances in instances where strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique and distinctive to the specific property or use under consideration. The provisions of the ordinance, considered in conjunction with the unique and distinctive circumstances must be the proximate cause of the hardship; circumstances caused by the property owner or the applicant or a predecessor in title shall not constitute sufficient justification to grant a variance. A variance may be granted after demonstration by evidence that all of the -- following qualifications are met: 1. A particular hardship would result; 2. The conditions are unique and are not common, generally to other property in the same zoning classification; and 3. That the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other improvements. 10 -11 -79 -1- Application No. .79062 continued Careful consideration of these standards should be given by the Commission prior to making a recommendation. The applicant's letter seems to adequately address the standards of hardship and noninjury to neighboring property, but does not specifically speak to whether the conditions which require a variance are "unique to the parcel of land and are not common, generally, to other property or uses within the same zoning classification." Common access to public right -of -way is not a unique condition. However, shared access is "not common, generally," to uses which are located on their own parcel of land and generally would be entitled to their own access. it is felt that the applicant does meet the sign ordinance variance standards ..and, therefore, approval is recommended subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant agrees not to alter, relocate or enlarge the existing directional sign. 2. The applicant agrees not to erect any other freestanding identi- fication or directional sign along John Martin Drive. A public hearing has been scheduled and notices have been sent. 10 -11 -79 -2- ehct.w4I, II, & III BROOKDALE EAST GENERAL CINEMA CORPORATION 5801 JOHN MARTIN DRIVE 0 BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 612.560.0780 25 September, 1979 BROOKLYN CENTER CITY COUNCIL In accordance with the Standards and Procedures for Zoning Variances, a variance from the city sign zoning ordinance is requested as follows; (a) The theatre entrance drive is at the opposite end of a very long parking lot from the theatre building. Because of the curve in John Martin Drive, people driving from the west do not see the building until after they have passed the entrance. Without the sign, they would miss the entrance and have to drive completely around to Shingle Creek Parkway and back to John Martin Drive to get back to the entrance, causing possible congestion and confusion on the above roads. Coming from the east, people may mistake our entrance for that of Perkins Restaurant and continue on to Shingle Creek Parkway, only to find it necessary to either make a u -turn or drive all the way around in order to get back to the entrance. (b) The theatre entrance is the sole access to the theatre and to the new American Family Insurance building, and is one of to access points to 0 Perkins Restaurant. The entrance drive was originally a part of the theatre property, but is now owned by American Family Insurance, who wish to erect their own sign. A variance would allow our sign to remain where it has been since 1972, while also allowing their sign on the opposite side of the drive, about eighty feet away. (c) The sign was-installed in March of 1972, at which time the entrance drive was included in the theatre property. Last year, the owner, Brooklyn Industrial Park, from whom the theatre land is leased, sold a parcel of land behind Perkins Restaurant and the entire entrance drive and'surrounding lawn to American Family Insurance, who have since erected and occupied a building on that land. Now our sign is on their property and they wish to erect a sign of their ovn on their land south of the drive. In order for them to put up a sign, either we must obtain a variance for ours, the only indicator of our entrance, or we must remove it, which would cause confusion and inconvenience to our customers, increased traffic congestion on John Martin Drive, and loss of business to the theatre. (d) Allowing a variance for our sign to remain as is would benifit not only the theatre, but also adjoining property owners and the general public. It would continue to point out the location of our entrance as it has for seven years, eliminating problems such as; people making u -turns on the frontage road or on John Martin Drive looking for our entrance, people thinking the entrance is a through street and then finding it a dead end, and people driving through Perkins lot looking for our entrance. We feel that the sign should remain as it is for the convenience and safety of the public, the adjacent.landowners, and this theatre. Sincerel .David M_ Ma-n r-re h - m rrr. - Section 34 -180. VARIANCES (ADJUSTMENTS) The procedure for obtaining a. variance from the requirements of this ordinance shall be the same as set out in Section 35 -240 of the Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals may recommend and the' City Council may grant variances from the literal provisions of this ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique and distinctive to the specific property or use under consideration. The provisions of this ordinance, considered in conjunction` with the unique and dis- tinctive circumstances related to the property or uses thereof must be the proxi- mate cause of the hardship; circumstances caused by the property owner or the applicant or a predecessor in title shall not constitute sufficient justification to grant a variance. A variance may be granted by the City Council after demon- stration by evidence that all of the following qualifications are rnet: 1. A particular hardship to the owner would result if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out; 2. The conditions upon which the application for a variance is • 'a land or t ' based are unique to the parcel of an he use thereof for _ P which the variance is sought and are not common, generally, to other property or uses thereof within the same zoning classification; 3. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood. Section 34 -190 ENFORCEMENT It shall be the responsibility of the City Manager to cause the requirements; of this ordinance to be properly enforced and to administer the same. Section 34 -200 - SEPARABILITY AND VALIDITY Every section, provision, or part of this ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision, or part to the extent that if any section, provision or part of the ordinance shall be held invalid, it - shall not invalidate any other section, provision, or part thereof. Section 34 -210 PENALTIES It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, _alter, repair, move, equip, or maintain any sign or sign structure or cause or permit the same to be done in violation of any of the provisions of this ordinance. Whoever does any act or omits to do any action which thereby constitutes a breach of any section of CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 REGARDING SETBACKS FROM MAJOR THOROUGHFARES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: d Section 1. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended as follows: Section 35 -400. TABLE OF MINIMUM DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS. Every use of land within the City of Brooklyn Center shall conform to the following minimum requirements which are applicable to the Land Use District in which such use is contemplated. 8 10 Yard Setbacks 5 3 5' " 2 ) Front Rear Side Interior Side Corner Section 35 -400 (2). Where no more than 3 interior lots have frontage on a "cross street," and where the corner lots are developed so that one side yard of each corner lot faces the "cross street," the front yard setback of the interior lots may conform to the side yard setbacks of the corner primary structures. [Setbacks along major thoroughfares as designated in Section 35 -900 shall in no event be less than 50 feet, measured from the street right -of -way line]. A single dwelling and permitted accessory structures may be constructed to within fifteen (15) feet of the side corner lot _line on a residential corner `lot which was of legal record on December 19, 1957, and which does not meet the requirements of this ordinance as to width. Section 35 -400 (10) Setbacks along major thoroughfares as designated in Section 3 sha in all cases be at least 50 feet, measured from the street right -of -way line, except for accessory structures in rear yards or in cases where mitigating circumstances exist, such as noise walls or berms excess right -of -way, or other condition deemed by the Zoning Official to constitute a substitute for such 50 foot setback. In such cases where a substitute does exist, the standard setback requirements shall apply. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty (30) days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of 1939. Mayor' ATTEST: Clerk Published in the Official` Newspaper Effective Date q i 1 i' PROPOSED ROADWAYS PROPOSED BRIDGES t son P A- man �v f 1 .r . k MEMORANDUM TO: Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection 'FROM: Will- Dahn, Building Official SUBJECT: Release of Performance Bond DATE: *October 17, 1979 Brooklyn Center Baptist Church 5840 Humboldt Avenue North Planning Commission File No. 77032 Amount of Guarantee - $1,000.00 - Cash Escrow All concrete curbing, asphalt paving and patching and sodding of boulevard on 59th Avenue and Humboldt Avenue have been accomplished per approved site plans. Recommend total release of Cash Escrow. Approved b Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection 4 IMINEE RING DEPAMIMM AGENDA ITEMS FOR THE OCTOBER 5, 1979 COUNCIL MEET'IlVG l� Resolution authorizing execution of contract for work at Unity Avenue culvert. 1 Cbnsideration of bids for Water meters (Resolution) Note Bids were received and opened on 10/16/79. It is reommv-nded that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. 3� Resolution authorizing equipment rental for Central Park Grading project. Resolution requesting JMND7t' to conduct speed survey and establish speed limit . -on Freeway Boulevard. �5) 'Authorization to accept ,proposal from Hickok Associates for on -site drainage con- ,trol at Howe, Inc. sr 6. Discussion of request for traffic signal system at Brooklyn Boulevard (T. H. 152) at 65th Avenue. 7.. Report on request for sidewalk on John Martin Drive. R I • M & C No. 79 -27 October 19, 1979 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Subject: City Manager - Professional and Lobbying Activity To the Honorable Mayor and City Council: During the last week I reviewed with various department heads their activity in professional associations, League committees, and other activities which could generally be classified as lobbying activity. This lobbying activity may be with the Legislature through their professional associations or with the Metro Council or other State and County agencies. It has been my practice to conduct this review periodically to make sure that certain areas in which the Council has expressed an interest in terms of policy development, that City department heads are involved in those areas and keeping themselves up to date and informed on any potential changes. An additional purpose of my review was to see if there was any duplication of our efforts. As City Manager I am active in the following areas: Secretary - Treasurer - Minnesota City Managers Association; Chairman - Metro Area Managers Association (MAMA) Public SAfety Committee; Chairman, MAMA Joint Police Negotiating Committee; Member of State League and Metro Association Revenue Committee; I serve the State League and Metro League on various ad hoc steering committees (State Aid Formula, Levy Limit Modifica- tion); and Vice President - LOGIS. Of the above mentioned activities by far the most time consuming for me was the MAMA Joint Police Bargaining Committee chairmanship. However, that has a periodic impact on my time because now there is a two year contract. A very close second in terms of time consumption and effort are the ad hoc committees - of the State and Metro Leagues. In particular, the State Aid Formula Steering Committee was time consuming; however, I think the end result, which was the new State aid formula, was well worth the expenditure of time. I am now serving on a similar steering committee as'it relates to levy limit modification. Time spent by myself in these areas and that of the department heads does not appear to be excessive. I am thoroughly convinced it is very important.for myself and the department heads, and at times the City Council, to be active in these various areas as when there is a need for input on behalf of Brooklyn Center, there is not always the opportunity to get appointed to the involved committee. You have to make a continuous effort at serving on these committees so that when there is a time when there can be benefit to Brooklyn Center or to other municipalities, you have the opportunity to provide the necessary advice. If any of the members of the City Council should ever wish to become active in any - given area, it would be a good idea to check with me as to:whether'or not some of the department heads or myself are not already expending time in'that area. If it is the case, adjustment can either be made one way or the other to provide that -there would be no duplication of effort on behalf of Brooklyn Center. E ed, plinter r CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PENDING PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATIONS OCTOBER 23, 1979 Pending Planning Commission Applications 79034 M. A. Mortensen Site &Bldg. John Martin Drive 79063 Lawrence Rudenick Plat 69th & Oliver Avenues North Items Tabled by Plannin�Commi 79055 Edwin Kauffman n /Village Builders Rezoning 58th and Logan Avenues North 79056 Edwin Kauffmann /Vil l age Builders Site & Bldg 58th and Logan Avenues N. Items Pending Council Approval 79019 Charlson /Brookdale Ford Plat Shingle Creek Parkway 79025 Jarold Modeen Rezoning 5455 to 5545 Brooklyn Boulevard MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION OCTOBER 11, 1979 CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission met in regular session and was called to order by Chairman Hai Pierce at 8:00 p.m, ROLL CALL Chairman Pierce, Commissioners Theis, Hawes and Lucht: Also present were Director of Planning and Inspection Ronald Warren. Building Official Will Dahn and Planning Assistant Gary Shallcross. APPLICATION NO. `79062 (Cinema I, II, III /David Maasch) Following the Chairman's explanation, the Secretary introduced the first item of. business, an application submitted by David Maasch on behalf of Cinema I, II & III for a variance from the Sign Ordinance to allow an existing directional sign to continue on the property owned by the American Family Insurance Association at 5901 John Martin Drive. The Secretary explained that the sign is located north of a common entrance drive shared by Cinema, the A.F.I.A. building and Perkins Restaurant. He stated that the area in question was formerly Cinema I, II, III property. He explained that when the A.F.I.A. property was platted, the land on which the sign is located was transferred by B.C.I.P. to the A.F.I.A, site. As a result, the sign is now off -site and, therefore, a billboard which is prohibited by the City's Sign Ordinance. The Secretary stated that A.F.I.A. now intends to erect a freestanding identification sign on the south side of the entrance drive and added that a condition of permitting any new signs is that all nonconforming signs an h i i g g the site either be removed or brought into con - formance. The Secretary then pointed out on a transparency the location of the A.F.I.A. and Cinema buildings and their respective signs. The Secretary referred the Commission to a letter r ette of application ication f am th y PP e applicant in which it is argued: 1. That the removal of the sign would create a hardship because theater patrons might miss the entrance and have to drive along a very circuitous route to get back to the theater. 2. Since the entrance in question is the only point of access to the Cinema and to American Family Insurance, it is vital a th t directional si ner adequately indicate this 9 y q Y entrance as serving both developments. 3. The - events leading up to the present nonconforming situation were beyond the control of the Cinema. 4. Granting of the variance will have no adverse impact on surrounding properties, but will benefit the general public by preventing u -turns on John Martin Drive and other confused traffic patterns. The Secretary next referred the Commission to Section 34 -180 of the City Ordinances which contains Standards for a Sign Ordinance Variance. He pointed out that this section allows variances in instances where strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique and distinctive to the specific property or use under consideration. 10 -11 -79 -1- ' The provisions of the ordinance, he added, when considered in conjunction with the unique and distinctive circumstances must be the proximate cause of the hardship; circumstances caused by the property owner or the applicant or a predecessor in title shall not constitute sufficient justification to grant a variance. A variance, he concluded, may be granted only after demonstration by evidence that all of the following qualifications are met: 1. A particular hardship to the owner would result if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out; 2. The conditions upon which the application for a variance is based unique to the parcel of land or the use thereof for which the variance is sought, and are not common, generally, to other property or uses thereof within the same zoning classification ;, 3. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood. The Secretary urged the Commission to give careful consideration to these Standards prior to making its recommendation. The Secretary stated that the applicant's letter seems 'to adequately address the standards'of hardship and noninjury to neighboring property, but does not specifically speak to whether the circumstances are "unique to the parcel of land and not common, generally, to other property or uses within the same zoning classificiation." The Secretary stated that common access to public right -of -way is not necessarily a unique condition. He added, however, that shared access if "not common, generally," to uses which are located on their own parcel of land and would generally be entitled to their own access._ The Secretary concluded his remarks by stating that he felt the application does meet the Sign Ordinance Standards and, therefore, recommended approval subject to certain conditions. In answer to a question from Commissioner Theis, the Secretary explained that the platting for the A.F.I.A. site took land from the Cinema site in order to provide frontage on public right -of -way as required by the City Ordinances. As a result, he said, the Cinema sign is now on A.F.I.A. property. Commissioner Erickson arrived at 8:10 p.m. Commissioner Lucht asked whether the proposed A.F.I.A. sign would be on its own property. The Secretary answered that it would, pointing out its location on the transparency. He explained that if the variance were granted for the Cinema sign, the A.F.I.A. sign could be erected. He further explained that the A.F.I.A. office building is entitled to a sign on its property, and a permit for that sign can be issued only if the nonconforming Cinema entrance sign,were` removed or a variance for that nonconforming sign were granted. He stated that it was felt that the Cinema entrance sign seems to be located in a rational location and does not seem objectionable. He also commented that the concept of shared access is considered desirable both for the applicant and the general public. 10 -11 -79 -2 Commissioner Hawes raised the possibility of Earle Brown Drive extending from John Martin Drive through to Shingle Creek Parkway, and asked whether the sign would be allowed to stay should this take place. The Secretary answered that if Earle Brown Drive became a through street, the Cinema would have direct access to a public street and would have no need for an off - site sign. Com- missioner Hawes asked whether the A.F.I.A. wants its sign on the south side of the access drive. Commissioner Lucht commented that it would be to their advantage to have the sign located there and the Secretary added that that was the location proposed by A.F.I.A. Commissioner Lucht asked whether the variance would have to be reviewed in the event that Earle Brown Drive became a through street. The Secretary stated that something like that could be added as a condition of approval. He then briefly discussed various roadway proposals for Earle Brown Drive and alternate procedures for installing the road. Commissioner Erickson asked how large the sign was and how large a sign would be allowed. Mr. Maasch stated that the sign was roughly 4 feet high and about 23 x 3 feet in size. The Secretary noted that this is well below the permitted size for directional signery.- Commissioner Erickson asked why it was necessary to limit the size of the sign as a condition of the variance. The Secretary answered that it is felt that the size of the sign is adequate and he would not want to encourage the expansion of the sign if the variance were approved. He noted also that such conditions are within the prerogative of the City in granting the variance. Chairman Pierce asked the applicant if he understood and accepted the conditions outlined by the Secretary and the Planning Commission. The applicant answered that he simply wanted to leave the sign where it was without any alterations. There was a brief discussion regarding the possibility of Earle Brown Drive being extended to Shingle Creek Parkway. The applicant stated that if the road extension was accomplished, he would have no need for a.sign at its present location and would move that sign onto his own' The Secretary referred the Commission's attention to a favorable letter from A.F.I.A. in which they stated they have no objection to leaving the present sign on their property so long as it does not affect their own right to erect a sign. PUBLIC HEARING Chairman Pierce opened the meeting for a public hearing and inquired whether anyone was present to speak to the application. No one spoke relating to the application.. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING Motion by Commissioner Lucht seconded by Commissioner Erickson to close the public hearing -. Voting in favor: Chairman Pierce, Commissioners Theis, Hawes, Lucht and Erickson. Voting against: none. The motion passed. The Secretary again asked Mr. Maasch if he would have any objection to moving the sign onto the Cinema property if Earle Brown Drive were extended. Mr. Maasch answered that the Cinema would not have any objection. The Secretary explained that based on the conditions recommended with the variance Cinema would have to take down their entrance sign if they wished to put up another sign on their i property. Chairman Pierce asked whether the granting of the variance would in any way affect the A.F.I.A. sign. The Secretary answered that it would not. 10 -11 -79 -3- ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 79062 (David Maasch /Cinema I,_ II, III Motion by Commissioner Lucht seconded by Commissioner Theis to recommend approval of Application No. 79062 submitted by David Maasch for Cinema I, II, III for a variance to allow a nonconforming directional sign for the Cinema to continue on the .A.F;I.A. property noting that the Sign Ordinance Variance Standards have be met. The granting of the variance is subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant agrees not to alter, relocate or enlarge the existing directional sign. 2. The applicant agrees not to erect any other freestanding identification or directional signs along John Martin Drive. 3. If Earle Brown Drive is extended and becomes a public street from John Martin Drive to Shingle Creek Parkway, Cinema signery must come into compliance with, the City's Sign Ordinance. Voting in favor: Chairman Pierce, Commissioners Theis, Hawes, Lucht and Erickson. Voting against: none. The motion passed. DISCUSSION ITEMS SETBACK AMENDMENT The Secretary introduced a recommended ordinance amendment by reminding the Plan- ning Commission of the plat of eleven residential lots at the corner of Xerxes Avenue and Interstate 694, some of which backed up to Freeway right -of -way. He stated that the Commission felt at that time that a 50 foot setback from major thoroughfare right -of -way should be required in rear yards as well as front and side corner yards. He stated that there is reasonable and rational justification for rear yard setbacks for principal dwellings, but at the same: time recommended that the Commission recognize noise walls or noise berms which _may provide sub- stitute shielding. Commissioner Theis inquired whether the new section of Interstate 94 in the southeast section of the City would have noise walls or a depressed roadway. The Secretary ,responded that both those features would be provided along 94 until it reached its intersection with 694. He stated that noise walls would be in place wherever the highway abutted residential uses. In answer to another question from Commissioner Theis, the Secretary stated that noise walls are built fairly close to the right -of -way line in most cases. A brief dis- cussion ensued relative to noise walls and the proposed ordinance amendment. ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 REGARDING SETBACKS FROM MAJOR THOROUGHFARES. Motion by Commissioner Lucht seconded by Commissioner Theis to recommend approval of an ordinance amending Section 35 -400 of the City Ordinances regarding setbacks from major thoroughfares. Voting in favor: Chairman Pierce, Commis- sioners Theis, Hawes, Lucht and Erickson. Voting against:. none. The motion passed unanimously. ENTRANCE TO ROCKY ROCOCO' The Secretary explained to the Planning Commission that Rocky Rococo's Restaur- ant, a new tenant in Brookdale Shopping Center, wished to undertake minor remodel - ing which included the addition of a 5' x 7' entrance area directly to the outside. 10 -11 -79 -4- - He explained that the cafeteria- styled restaurant has been occupied by a number of restaurant businesses over the years that have not been able to make a go of it. Brookdale has analyzed the situation and thinks that some outside identi- fication and an outside entrance might give the space more identity. He further explained that the only access to the space is currently through the Brookdale Mail and internal walkway areas. Brookdale has agreed to assist Rocky Rococo's with the construction of a new entrance area. He noted that the exist- ing entrance would remain. The Secretary reported that while reviewing this proposal, the matter of handi- capped accessibility of the new entrance was extensively discussed. He explained that the current entrance is accessible to the handicapped, but the new 'entrance would not be. He noted further that the new entrance would provide Rocky Rococo's with the ability to be open at hours other than that of the entire Brookdale complex and for that time it would not be accessible to the handicapped. He explained that the space has three levels: the serving area that is on the same level as the Brookdale Mall and is accessible to the handicapped; and two eating areas which are on levels above and below the serving area and are not accessibile. He further explained that when Rocky Rococo's sought occupancy permits and did some decorative remodeling they also provided a handicapped eating counter on the service level to accommodate handicapped persons. He noted that the new entrance would provide access to the lower serving level only and, therefore, would not be totally accessible to the handicapped. The Secretary explained the difficulty of providing access to the eating areas which were situated four feet above and four feet below the serving area. He added that the Building Official has inquired about the issue at the State and that the State Building Codes Division does not consider total accessibility to be required in this case because the proposal would not be a major alteration. He added that the Building Codes Division does not feel that a space such as this would have to made totally accessible at all hours because of this minor alteration, and that the alteration would not be contrary to the handicapped accessibility code. The Planning Commission discussed the feasibility of providing access to the handicapped, calling on the Building Official to provide technical information.. The Building Official explained that the initial remodeling plan is minor in scope and that the City cannot, therefore, require total handicapped accessi- bility. He explained that the ramp leading to the lower area at the required grades established.for handicapped ramping, would be 48 feet long. Such a ramp would take up most of the dining area on the lower level. He added that if the outside entrance were to be made accessible, a 27 foot ramp would be needed on the outside of the restaurant. Moreover, he added, the outside ramping would be useless without ramping on the inside since handicapped patrons could not get food otherwise. The Building Official explained that in addition to the handi- capped counter on the service level, it is the policy of the restaurant to bring tables from the other levels to the main floor should a handicapped patron require more seating. This he considered the most feasible solution. After further discussion, the Planning Commission agreed with the Building Official`s analysis and recommendation and concurred with the recommendation that the entry was only a minor addition not requiring the space be made totally accessible. Since the item was only informational, there was no further action taken on the matter. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW Commissioner Hawes pointed out a number of apparent errors in the text of the Comprehensive Plan on pages 37, 44, 49, 51 and 57._ 10 -11 -79 -5- The Secretary noted these areas for transmission to the Planning Consultant and encouraged the rest of the Commission to review the Comprehensive Plan care -- fully and offer corrections at the public hearing. After some additional comments on technical errors in the Plan document, the Secretary stated that the Commission could hold a public hearing on October 25, 1979 and could pass the Plan on to the City Council at that time if it felt satisfied with the Plan. If not satis- fied, it could hold the plan over for another hearing in November. Chairman Pierce stated that he would prefer to review the Plan as extensively as possible. Chairman Pierce noted that the area just south of 694 along Brooklyn Boulevard is designated in the proposed Land Use Plan to be for mid- density residential. He asked whether this designation would make existing uses nonconforming. Com- missioner Theis recommended that only when the land was redeveloped should the Plan recommendations be put in force via a zoning change. The Secretary added that the Plan itself does not require the City to undertake a blanket rezoning of all property proposed for different uses in the Plan upon its adoption. The Planning Assistant commented that if the City adopts the Comprehensive Plan with various Land Use designations, it should be serious about implementing the policy stated in the Plan at an appropriate time in the future. There was a further brief discussion of technical aspects of the Plan. The Secretary again stated that he would make a list of the revisions suggested and pass them on to the Planning Consultant, Commissioner Manson arrived at 10:05 p.m. The Chairman asked Commissioner Manson if she had any comments to make on the Comprehensive Plan. She had no comment. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Hawes seconded by Commissioner Erickson to adjourn the meeting of the Planning Commission. Voting in favor: Chairman Pierce, Com- missioners Theis, Hawes, Manson, Lucht and Erickson.. Voting against: none. The motion passed. The Planning Commission adjourned at 10:07 p.m. Chairman 10 -11 -79 6 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 REGARDING SETBACKS FROM g MAJOR THOROUGHFARES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: E'? Section 1. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended as follows: Section 35 -400. TABLE OF MINIMUM DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS. Every use of land within the City of Brooklyn Center shall conform to the following minimum requirements which are applicable to the Land Use District in which such use is contemplated. 8 10 Yard Setbacks 5 3 5 2 Front Rear Side Interior Side Corner Section 35 -400 (2) Where no more than 3 interior lots have frontage on a "cross street," and where the corner lots are developed so that one side yard of each corner lot faces the "cross street," the front yard setback of the interior lots may conform to the side yard setbacks of the corner primary structures. [Setbacks' along major thoroughfares as designated in Section 35 -900 shall in no event be less than 50 feet, measured from the street right -of -way l ine]. A single family dwelling and permitted accessory structures may be constructed; to within fifteen (15) feet of the side corner lot line on a residential corner lot which was of legal record on December 19, 1957, and which does not meet the requirements of this ordinance as to width Section 35 -400 (10). Setbacks along major thoroughfares as designated .i S - i feet n S ecti on 0 shall n all cases be east 50 , measured from the and r in street ri line exce t for accessor structures in rear s o � P Y Y cases where mitigatin mstances exist, such as noise walls or berms, excess ri -o m b h Zoning Official to x s ht f or othe condition deemed the constitute a s stitute fo such 50 foot setback. In such cases where a su stitute d es xist, e standard setback requirements shall apply. S 'n 2. Th' ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty (30) owing its legal publication. Adopted this day of 1979. a Mayor ATTEST: Clerk Published in the Official Newspaper Effective Date i MEMORANDUM TO: Gerald G. Splinter City-Manager FROM: Director of Finance DATE: October 11, 1979 SUBJECT: Recommended Increases for Community Center Memberships and Admissions During the 1980 City Budget discussions, the City Council agreed upon a general increase in Community Center rates for 1980. Mr. Hagel has, since those discussions, made specific recommendations for rate increases. You and I reviewed those recommendations with Mr. Hagel and Mr. Mavis and agreed upon recommendations to be submitted to the City Council. Would you please ask the Council to approve the rate increases at the next Council meeting? The recommended rate increases are attached. Respectfully subbitted, Paul W. Holmlund PH:pk cc: Gene Hagel, Director of Parks & Recreation Arnie Mavis, Superintendent of Recreation I COMMUNITY CENTER MEMBERSHIPS AND GENERAL ADMISSION INCREASES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1980 FROM TO MEMBERSHIPS Family, 3 months $21.00 $25.00 Family, 6 months 39.00 45.00 Family, 1 year 66.00 78.00 Individual, 3 months 12.00 15.00 Individual, 6 months 20.00 25.00 Individual, 1 year 33.00 40.00 GENERAL ADMISSION p Adults, age 18 and over $ 1.25 $ 1.50 Youth, age 15 through 17 .75 1.00 Children, age 5 through 14 .60 .75 Note: Memberships and admissions entitle the adult holder to the use of the swimming pool,. exercise room and sauna during recreational or "open" periods. The use of the sauna is limited to ages 18 years and over. The use of the exercise room is limited to ages 15 and over. PH:pk The following is a completed list of election judges that will be working the general election on November 6, 1979: PRECINCT 1 Head Judge R- Marian Smith 5431 Oliver Avenue North R -Donna Bennett 2106 54th Avenue North D- Ardyce Matson 5525 Morgan Avenue North D- Lucille Kircher 5550 James Avenue North PRECINCT 2 Head Judge D -Ethel Irving 6020 Emerson Avenue North R- Adeline Lonn 6342 Fremont Avenue North R -Nancy Tanji 6330 Girard Avenue North D- Cheryl Jacobson 6342 Girard Avenue North PRECINCT 3 Head Judge R- Evonne Chatelle 7006 Newton Avenue North D- Esther Durland 6851 W. River Road R- Sharon Finucane 7013 Morgan Avenue North D -Jean Schiebel 2120 70th Avenue North 9 PRECINCT 4 Head Judge D -Alice Madir 7024 Quail Avenue North D- Alberta Ruf 7119 France Avenue North D- LaVerne Webber 7106 Grimes Avenue North R -Joyce Legler 4813 71st Avenue North PRECINCT 5 Head Judge D- Geraldine Dorphy 4306 Winchester Lane D -Alice VanMeerten 4519 Winchester Lane R- Gladys Leerhoff 4301 66th Avenue North R -Joan McGonigal 4806 Howe Lane PRECINCT 6 Head Judge D -Lois Moeller 2818 O'Henry Road R -Joan Reavely 3018 Mumford Road R- Josephine Swart 6007 Xerxes Avenue North D- Shirley Anderlie 6813 Beard Avenue North PRECINCT 7 Head Judge D -Mona Hintzman 4018 58th Avenue North R- Barbara Forder 5936 Halifax Place D -Carol Benkofske 4019 Janet Lane R -Dawn Kiefer 6218 Kyle Avenue North PRECINCT 8 Head Judge D -Ethel tman 4919 Beard Avenue North A -Kathy Theisen 5701 June Avenue North R- Dorothy Olson 3906 Burquest Lane D -Anne Bergquist 5133 Xerxes Avenue North MEMORANDUM " TO: Jerry Splinter, City Manager FROM: Jim Lindsay, Chief of Police DATE: October 15, 1979 SUBJECT: Interagency Special Investigation Squad (I.S.I.S.) The .greatest deficiency any law enforcement agency experiences in a major case investigation is not a lack of expertise, but rather a lack of available manpower: The most efficient method is to in- vestigate all leads as soon as possible. Very few departments have sufficient manpower to simultaneously investigate a major case and continue to provide adequate police protection. In the event of a major investigation, a dilemma always exists in making a tradeoff between the general operation and the amount of manpower assigned to the major investigation. Several communities in the Minneapolis -St. Paul Metropolitan area experiencing this problem have met to consider alternatives. This group of chiefs reviewed what is in operation in other parts of the M country. From these meetings, an approach for this area has been formulated. Consideration has been given to several areas._ Some of these include: 1. Ability to maintain normal level of police service while-thoroughly investigating a major case. 2. To reduce the cost of a major investigation when possible. 3. To utilize as much expertise as possible. 4. To retain local control of any interagency group. 5. To be able to expedite an investigation before clues are old and lost. Under an interagency approach, the police agencies would share -man power and equipment. Equipment shared would eliminate each department purchasing the same expensive and little used equipment. By rotating officers from various departments, we could provide 24 hour continuous investigation. This would eliminate the need for officers to work more than 8 hours at a time, keeping the agencies from paying large amounts of overtime. Memorandum Jerry Splinter, City Manager Page Two Brooklyn Center would be required, from time to time, to furnish manpower and equipment to assist other departments. If we were ex- ceptionally busy, we could pass, without supplying manpower or equip- ment. A good example of an interagency squad assisting Brooklyn Center is the recent drowning in the Mississippi River. what first appeared to be a person swimming in the river and drowning turned in- to a drug related homicide. Many hours were spent by officers from the department investigating this case. Two officers are still work - ing almost full -time on this. An interagency squad would have com- pleted the investigation within one week. Currently, there are fourteen police departments interested in this program. Sheriff Omodt is considering joining, but has not indicated which way he is leaning at this time. I am attaching the proposed joint powers and the by -laws of the interagency squad. I recommend the Brooklyn Center Police Department join the Interagency Special Investigation Squad. J01NT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR INTER- AGENCY SPECIAL INVESTIGATION SQUAD THIS IS AN AGREEMENT made and entered into this ist day of January 1980,-by and among the undersigned cities and counties through the action of their governing bodies.,•in accordance with the Joint Powers Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section.471.59. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, a single city or county rarely has adequate staff or , other resources to conduct the thorough and prompt investigation required for the expedient solution of very complicated and time consuming major crimes; and WHEREAS, perpetrators of major crimes often flee to, and take refuge in, cities and counties other than those in which the crimes have .. been committed; and WHEREAS, witnesses and other pieces of evidence of these major crimes are often found in more than one city or county; and WHEREAS, the commission of a major crime in any city or county poses a threat to the safety, health and welfare of the residents of the entire surrounding area; and WHEREAS, a pooling of resources in a combined investigative action by neighboring cities and counties can result in the expedient solution of major crimes; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.221 and Section 387.03 grants to the undersigned cities and counties the separate power to provide for the government and good order of their cities and counties, for the prevention of crime, for the protection of public and private property, and for the promotion of the health, safety and welfare of their residents; and WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 471-59, permits cities and counties to jointly and cooperatively exercise any powers common to each, including those powers which are the same except for the territorial limits in which they may be exercised. MOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Inter-Agency Special Investigation Squad There is hereby created the Inter- Agency Special Investigation Squad which shall be comprised of police personnel from the police agency of the undersigned cities and counties and the purpose of which shall be to conduct special case investi- gations within such cities and counties as provided herein. 2. Parties The original parties to this Agreement shall consist of those cities and counties in the Minneapolis -St. Pal Metropolitan Area which have elected to become parties through the adoption of resolutions by their governing bodies and which have caused their authorized officials to execute this Agreement on their behalf the day and year first above written and to attach a certified copy of the resolution indicating its manner of adoption. In addition, other cities and counties in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area may become parties through the adoption of resolutions by their governing bodies and their approval as parties by the Board of Directors of the Squad as provided herein. Upon the adoption of such resolution by any eligible city and county and approval by the Board, this Agreement shall be submitted to such city or county for execution by its lawfully authorized official. Such official shall also attach to this Agreement a certified copy of the resolution indicating its manner of adoption. -2- 3. Board of Directors The Squad shall be governed by a Board of Directors comprised of the heads of each police agency of those eligible cities and counties which adopt this Agreement and which are approved as P 9 PP parties. The Board shall adopt and may amend by -laws and other rules, shall determine all major policies and procedures and shall resolve any conflicts which may arise in the operation of the Squad. The Board shall meet on the first working Monday of January and July of each year and at such other times upon the call of the Chairman who shall give due notice of the calling of such special meeting to each director. Consideration'of applications by cities and counties and other'Board actions may be taken at any regular or special meeting and any action taken by the Board shall require a majority vote of those directors present and voting at any meeting. In the event of illness or other good cause, a director may designate a subordinate officer from the same city or county to represent him with full powers of substitution at any meeting of the Board of Directors. 4. Executive Committee At its January meeting, the Board of Directors shall elect an Executive Committee consisting of a Chairman, Vice - Chairman, Secretary - Treasurer and two members -at- large, all of whom shall be directors. The Executive Committee shall appoint a Team Commander and the various other command and supervisory officers from among Squad personnel and shall regulate the day - today activities of the Squad with full power to 'remove individual officers from the Squad. The Executive Committee shall meet on the first working Tuesday of each month and, except as provided herein, shall retain final authority for the assignment or withdrawal of the Squad from any case. The Executive Committee shall also have such powers and duties as are consistent with the law and which are provided in the bylaws or which shall be delegated to It by the Board of Directors from time to time. 5. Personnel The personnel of the Squad shall consist of those police employees from each city and county who are appointed by the heads of each police agency to serve on the Squad and who'are duly qualified to so serve. Requirements concerning the qualifications, operations and responsi- b1litles of the Squad personnel shall be provided in the bylaws or such other rules and regulations as are adopted by the Board. 6. Activation of Squad The head of each police agency or'his designee which is a party to this Agreement, and in which a major crime has recently been committed, may request the assistance of the Squad by contacting the Squad Commander (or his deputy in his absence), who shall evaluate the request and convey it to any member of the Executive Committee. Such member ` of the Executive Committee shall have the discretion to either deny the request or activate the Squad; In the event the Squad Commander cannot contact any t member of the Executive Committee after reasonable efforts he shall have the discretion to either deny the request or activate the Squad. The remaining members of the Executive Committee may, by unanimous action, overrule the actions of the member acting alone or the Squad Commander concerning the decision to activate the Squad. The Squad Commander shall at all times consult with, and be subject to, the authority of the ranking officer of the local jurisdiction in which Squad operations are being conducted. Any conflicts between the Squad Commander and 'local ranking officer shall be resolved by the Executive Committee; provided, however, that the requesting agency has the absolute authority at all times to order the Squad to cease its operation and to withdraw therefrom.` 7. Disbursements The parties may contribute cash or other property to the Squad and any funds paid to the Squad shall be disbursed as determined by the Board of Directors. The receipt and disbursement of all funds shall be strictly accounted for and the letting of contracts and purchasing by the Board shall conform to the statutory and other requirements applicable to contracts and purchases by cities within Minnesota. In addition, any expenditure of funds by a party in connection with a cash payment to the Squad or the use of city or county personnel or equipment hereunder shall agree as far as practicable with the method provided by law for the.expenditure of public funds by the parties hereto. 8. Responsibility Except as provided herein and in ''the Squad bylaws, any officers conducting activities hereunder as members of the Squad shall remain under the direction and control of their respective cities and counties when acting hereunder. Each city and county shall be responsible for compensating those of its officers who are members of the Squad and shall provide that their actions are covered by worker's compensation and other forms of liabri.lity insurance. In addition, each party `shall. be responsible for the care and maintenance of its own equipment and supplies which are used in connection with Squad operations. 9. Indemnification Each city and county shalt idemnify and hold the other parties to this Agreement harmless for any tosses or claims for personal injury, property damage or other torti -ous acts or emissions which are allegedly caused by any of its regularly employed officers in performance of their Squad functions. 10. Duration. This Agreement shall be effective as of the date hereof for the original parties hereto and shall be effective as of the date of execution for any additional parties who may be added from time to time as provided herein. Any party may withdraw from this Agreement at any time upon thirty (30) days' written notice delivered or mailed to the Chairman. 11. Distribution of Property Any property or surplus monies acquired as the result of the organization and operation of the Squad shall be distributed to the parties upon the termination of this Agreement in exact proportion to their contribution of such property or monies. in addition, any party which withdraws from this Agreement prior to its termination shall be entitled to-the return of any property which it has contributed, or the cash equivalent thereof, and to a proportionate share of any surplus monies.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned cities and counties have caused this Agreement to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officials the day and year below written. Dated: By , Its Dated: By Its Dated: By Its ti Dated: By Its Dated: By Its Dated: BY Its OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES INTERAGENCY SPECIAL INVESTIGATION SQUAD (ISIS) PART 1 PURPOSE OF iSI5 This team was conceived after law enforcement officials of several communities sought to answer the challenge of the criminal elements operating together throughout the multi- jurisdictional Minneapolis -St. Paul metropolitan area. They recognized that a pooling of investigative resources in a combined investigative action could lead to the expedient solution of serious crimes. We feel that a cooperative effort by these agencies should mutually benefit each one, Inasmuch as: 1. A smaller municipality rarely is sufficiently staffed or equipped to investigate a major case.. , 2. The perpetrator in many cases resides or takes refuge in one community while he perpetrates crimes in other communities. ` 3. Witnesses, leads and evidence may be found in more than one jurisdiction. 4. The general pooling of resources seems to be the most efficient method In the fight against crime, and with our already expanded cooperative functions, this measure is a logical development. We strongly emphasize that no city will assert jurisdiction where none exists and that this Team will not operate at cross purposes with any assisting agency. The Team will, upon request, assist with investigations as determined by the Board of Directors. It Is anticipated that a major case investigation will be conducted on a twenty-four • (24) hour basis over a span of several days. The Team will, therefore, be divided into shifts, at the discretion of the Team Commander. PART 11 - ADMINISTRATION OF THE TEAM f A. Board of Directors ISIS shall be governed by a Board of Directors composed of the Chiefs of Police of the law enforcement agencies who are participating in the operation and activities. The Board shali determine all major policies and establish all necessary principles and procedures of the Team and shall make final decisions on all conflicts that arise. The Board will hold Bi- annual meetings, one of which will be the election of officers In January of each year. These officers shall be known as the Executive Committee. e Executive Committee shall be comprised of the Chairman, Vice- Chairman, Secretary - easurer and two members at large. The Chairman may call special board meetings based Y P s on need. The Board will consider all applications.of new member agencies and also determine their removal for just cause. • Br Executive Committee The Executive Committee shall appoint the various command and supervisory officers from among the membership of the Team, shall screen individual applicants for member- ship and shall have the authority to appoint and remove individual members of the team. The committee shall also exercise final authority for assignment or withdrawal of Team personnel to or from any case or area. Monthly meetings will be held by the Executive Committee and all appointed Command Staff. C. Command'Staff Each member agency will appoint an officer in charge from their agency. The identity of this officer in charge will be communicated to the Executive Committee. A Team Commander and a Deputy Commander will be selected by the Executive Committee. The Team Commander will act as an advisor to the Officer in Charge of the Investigation and will be guided by the direction of the Officer in Charge. The Officer in Charge will be kept fully informed of all plans, leads and results of the investigation by the Team Commander. PART III - MEMBERSHIP AND TRAINING Membership in the Team shall be restricted to full - time, salaried, comissioned la*W enforcement officers of the participating law enforcement agencies. Other qualified police employees may also be members if they possess specialized skills. Membership should be predicated on knowledge of investigative techniques or special skills, ability to secure citizen cooperation, skill in report writing and wiliingness to function as a W eam. Those selected must accept assignments as given, follow prescribed procedures nd be able to offer loyalty, energy nd enthusiasm asm to their supervisor in no less degree than would be afforded their home agency. Participating agencies will be required to furnish or supplement 'occupational profile" Information on all -Team members or applicants connected with their agency, inciuding a any change of status information' such information to be provided to the proper Personnel Officer through Executive Committee channels. The Team shall consist-of the following a. A Team Commander and at least one Deputy Team Commander. b. A Personnel Officer and at least one alternate, C. An Equipment Officer and at least one alternate. d. A Report Officer and at least one alternate e. An Evidence Officer and at least one alternate. f. Investigators and other Specialists consisting of the balance of Team members. As previously stated, the above supervisory officers shall be appointed by the Executive Committee and, with the rest of the Team, shall be subject to change at the d iscretion of the Executive Committee. The responsibility of the Team Commander and the Supervisory Officers will be set forth Individually in ensuing PartAV. Members of the Team will be trained so that each will be able to handle any facet of an investigation. The training will be under the auspices of the Executive Committee. PART IV - RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMMAND STAFF ' 10A. Officer in Charge The ranking officer of a law enforcement agency requesting the assistance of the Team '~ or any full - time, salaried, commissioned law enforcement officer of that agency designated by the Chief will be known as the "Officer in Charge" of the area of an Investigation. if for any reason there is disagreement between the Team Commander and the OIC with-any phase of the investigation, an appeal may be made to the Executive Committee who authorized the investigation. The Officer in Charge and the Team Commander will designate an Investigative Team Leader depending on the number of personnel assigned. The Officer in Charge and the Team Commander will through these investigative Team Leaders: I. Arrange for office quarters for the Team. 2. Provide proper equipment for the investigation. 3. Provide necessary ources f information rY when needed. .Make arrangements for vehicle maintenance and repair and purchase of gas and oil at any time of the day. 5. Arrange for transportation and communication facilities needed. 6. Arrange for special equipment needed such as helicopters, airplanes, - diving suits, etc.. • 10 7• Establish liaison with criminal investigative laboratories or other public or private firms which can aid in the investigation. 6. Make general preparation for introducing into an area a large investi- gative group and their attendant needs both personal and official. This would include location of restaurants, etc. 9. Provide the Team members with identification authenticating their temporary but official duties in the area. This should be in the form of a card limited • to a specific span of time and identifying the officer's home'agency and certifying this official capacity in the jurisdiction. 10. Review proposed sand ress release `i P submit to the local Chief of Police for approval. Information to be released should be agreed upon by the OIC, Team Commander and Chief of Police. $. Team Commander and /or deputy Commander V The Commander of the Team and /or Deputy Commander must be an experienced administrator skilled in the actual direction of a criminal investigation, in supervision of personnel and In the coordination of a multi- faceted investigative effort. He /they will be in complete charge of all personnel assigned to the Investigative Assistance Team and to those personnel assigned to a particular investigation at which time he /they will be responsible to the Officer in Charge and work with him in a Team concept aimed at the esolution of the crime. e Team Commander, through the Officer in Charge, wilt determine the number of personnel to assign to the investigation and will then direct the Personnel Officer to select which particular Team members-are to be assigned. Page 4 The Team Commander and Officer in Charge will determine the investigative Supervisors who will, as assigned, take charge of various phases of the assigned investigation. I (The Team Commander will, through delegation to investigative Supervisors, perform the duties as outlined in Attachment 1). The Officer in Charge and the Team Commander wili consult, as needed, with the Executive Committee and immediately advise them of completion or suggested discon- tinuance of the investigation for any reason whatsoever. if at any the Team Commander learns of incompetency, misconduct or lack of cooperation of any Team member, rendering such member ineffective, he should immediately bring such condition to the attention of the Executive'Committee for appropriate action. C. Personnel Officer The Personnel Officer immediately upon his appointment will survey each locality with the local agency representative and arrange suitable quarters to house the Team. He shall determine the exact location to be used as Team Headquarters in each general area of operation. The equipment and facilities available at each location for such -quarters should be recorded and the name, address and telephone of the individual to contact for access to the location should be recorded and maintained. Once each. quarter the Personnel Officer should check and determine.if his information is current and correct. The Personnel Officer will prepare index cards on each officer assigned to the Team fl eflecting: full name, local address, telephone and the person-to be contacted or otified in case of an emergency. Reverse side of the e card should reflect special qualifications, linguistic abilities, familiarity with area, abilities with technical equipment, etc. This file should be kept current. Upon notification from the Team Commander that the Team is to be activated, the .Personnel Officer, with the Team Commander, will select and dispatch the designated dumber of Team members to the agency requesting assistance. An Investigative Supervisor, Evidence Officer and crime scene search personnel will report directly to the scene, but all other assigned personnel will report to the Team headquarters. The Personnel Officer will see that all personnel are informed of the Team headquarters location and telephone number and that the assigned Assistant County-Attorney (if County Attorney so designates) Is informed of the Team's activities and the location of the crime scene. Upon completion of case assignments, the Personnel Officer should report to the Team headquarters immediately and advise the Officer in Charge or' Team Commander of each arrival and his duty status and availability. He should check each Team member's index card for accurate information. The Personnel. Officer shall also explain police, press relations and other local condi- tions and situations to the Team, furnish Team with list of pertinent telephone numbers, city maps, eating places and any other' pertinent information, inform Team of established locations where as can b b g e obtained. explain parking hours. and :space and eriodically advise Team members of local problems pertinent to them. andie personal problems of Team members. Aid in mobilizing personnel;.for conferences or for other purposes. ' After organization and complete assembly of Team, assist Team Commander and Officer in Charge in any other duties. Page 5 - D. Equipment Officer Has the responsibility for the condition and availability of all property and equipment Which may be used. Any expenditures must be approved by the Officer in Charge and /or the Team Commander. Must coordinate closely with 'the Team Commander as to how the investigation is proceeding In order that equipment needs may be anticipated. Y P Will take all necessary action dictated by the circumstances to see that needed property will be on hand whenever a need arises. Will immediately set in motion efforts to: 1. Inventory and record pertinent equipment available for use. Equipment lists should contain location of equipment and person to authorize its use. Separate lists for each department and equipment available should be maintained and kept current. (See Attachment 2 for listing of necessary supplies). 2. In addition to the above, the Equipment Officer should consider the advisability of: a. Arranging for twenty -four (24) hour photographic service. b. Establishing extra phone service or setting up same if temporary headquarters are being established. c. Telephone service should P b Y - ass switchboard. 3. The Equipment Officer should prepare and maintain a list of; a. Evidence Officers and equipment in each jurisdiction. b. Sound recording equipment in each jurisdiction. C. Polygraph examiners, other than Team members, and equipment in each jurisdiction and indicate if equipment is portable or fixed. E. Report Officer The Report Officer will be responsible for receiving, editing, indexing, filing, summarizing and reviewing all case reports and for the supervising of assigned clerical employees. (He should also perform the duties as outlined in Attachment 3). F. Evidence Officer Evidence officers will be assigned to the investigation in teams of two depending on need. (The Evidence Officers will be responsible for duties as outlined in Attachment 4). PART V - PROCEDURES FOR ACTIVATION OF TEAM A. if a crime occurs within the purview of the Team's purposes and circumstances rage v indicate that assistance Is needed, the local * Chief of Police or his designee representing the requesting law enforcement agency shall call the Team Commander and make a request to activate the Team. The Team Commander will evaluate the request and then _contact a member of the Executive Committee. Any one member of the Executive Committee shall have the authority to either activate the Team or deny the request. in the event that the Team Commander cannot reach any member of the Executive Committee, the Team Commander will then have the authority to either activate the Team or deny the request. D. The requesting officer should take all steps necessary to secure the crime scene and prevent contamination until the arrival of Team personnel and crime scene processing officers. C. Any request for assistance of the Team should come.as soon as possible after the requesting jurisdiction learns of the crime. Except under most unusual circum Stances a request received more than eight (8) hours after discovery of the crime may be sufficient grounds to withhold Team assistance. D. The Team Commander receiving the call should in all cases obtain the following Information: 1. Name, rank, address and telephone number of the officer requesting assistance. 2. Location of the gathering place or building where the Team is to convene. 3. Type of crime, time of the crime and time discovered. 4. A resume of the facts, including the exact location, type of terrain, equip - ment needed, whether Federal jurisdiction is involved, evidence known and other helpful data. 5• The number of men the caller feels would be desirable to handle this Investigation. 6. He should inform the caliin` authorit that the crime scene should be protected ted Y p at once by cordon, if possible, and that it would be expected that the scene will be preserved so that Team members• might handle the crime scene search without it having been previously gone over. E. When the decision is made to activate theiTeam the Team Commander will then contact the Personnel Officer for mobilization. Team members will be called by the Personnel Officer and informed to report as quickly as possible and at a location other than the crime scene. F. Each agency should make prior arrangements, if necessary, to provide a suitable headquarters for the Team, should at be needed in this jurisdiction.- The quarters should contain office space for the. supervisor, conference area, report writing facilities, interrogation space and telephone communication. The quarters may be located in the existing facilities of the requesting agency, if they are adequate. G. No Investigation by the Team will extend over five days, except where unusual - circumstances warrant an extension. Any question concerning extension should be referred to the Executive Committee for decision. The requesting Chief of Police or his designee wiil make the request for extension. H. The requesting agency will be expected to exert maximum effort to participating In the investigation. These rules reviewed and approved on Rate) Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department • Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department f AIIALMMtNT 1 DUTIES OF TEAM COMMANDER' 1. Supervise the actual crime scene search after preliminary review of the physical circumstances. He will direct the activites of the Evidence Officer in photo- graphing, gathering, identifying and preserving all the physical evidence. 2. The Officer in Charge and the Team Commander may authorize the use of experts as required but will keep the originating agency head informed of such decision as soon as possible after being made. 3. Upon discovery of leads, will have lead cards prepared, assign leads for investi- gation and follow -up on the results obtained. 4. insures that prospective witnesses not located or interviewed initially are rescheduled for interview. 5. Will recommend and order the use of technicians and equipment beneficial to the Investigation. 6. Shall review all reports including those considered nonproductive, to make sure that no leads are overlooked. Y 7. Should call meetings, or use other appropriate means, from time to time, to brief members on the progress of the case, and should stress that no member should begin investigation of a new suspect or lead without first receiving approval for such action. Shall consult with the Officer in Charge regarding legal problems which may be encountered and keep the Officer in Charge fully informed as to progress of the investigation. 9._ Shall control activities of all investigative personnel, insuring that the report Y P their progress in assigned tasks before following any new line of inquiry. 10. Should prepare reports of divviculties encountered with regard to administrative, legal or logistical problems and provide copies to the Executive Committee. 11. Establish extra phone service or setting yp same if temporary headquarters are being established. 12. Telephone service should bypass switchboard. 13. Prepare and maintain a list of polygraph examiners, other than Team members, and equipment in each jurisdiction and indicate if equipment is portable or fixed 14. Review proposed press i^eleases and 'submit to the local Chief of Police for approval.` Information to be released should be agreed upon by the 0. #.C., Team Commander and Chief of Police. - 0+111%6nntNT Z EQUIPMENT LIST FOR EQUIPMENT OFFICER A. Firearms, gas equipment, restraining devices. Compasses, binoculars. C. Lights: flash, signal, search, mileray. D. Photographic equipment and supplies. E.. First Aid Kits and other medical supplies. F. Copy equipment and supplies. G. Ropes and cord. H. City, Village, County, State and area maps. I. Gas credit cards or vehicle servicing facilities. J. Thermos jugs. K. Technical equipment in sufficient quantity. L. Two-way-radio cars and other communication equipment such as Nandi and batteries. H. Boots, picks, crowbars, axes and shovels. N. Food on a twenty - four (24) hour basis. 0. Blankets, stretcher. P. Autos - borrow from other agencies or firms, arrange for rentals if necessary. Desks typewriters and other office equipment. If necessary, set up . temporary headquarters. R. Timetables for all common carriers in'the area. S. Airplanes (or helicopters) with all facts such as capacity, range experience of Pilot, descriptive data as to craft. T. Same as above for boats and skin divers. ' U. List of doctors for medical attention, V. Blackboard and chalk. i W. Extra batteries for all battery operated equipment. X. Storage area for extra property used in the investigation. Y. Room in or near office with cots for brief rests by`Team members. t ATTACHMENT 3 DUTIES OF REPORT OFFICER 1., Require each investigator to use and properly complete the forms provided for reporting. 2. Require reports in triplicate or as required. Additional copies may be made, if necessary, to assist the investigative staff in its duties. 3. Require investigators to submit individual reports for each suspect investigated. 4. Place only productive information in the main case file. No report of elimination of suspects should be included in this file. 5: Place all nonproductive information (elimination of suspects, etc.) in a secondary (or bulky exhibit) file. All extraneous investigative data,: includin g extra copies of reports, is placed in this file. 6. Prepare a daily or general progress report as determined by the Team Commander. 7. Upon termination of the Team's participation in the investigation, pre a general report of the findings, (with a resume introduction) which is indexed and divided according chronology of events and 9 s ca bf 9Y g - investigation. �. Upon successful solution of a case by the Team, prepare an indexed prosecutive summary, listing the facts of the crime, the criminal history of the defendant and the evidence to be presented and by whom. Serve as an historian for the entire case. 10. Should exercise discretion in preventing disclosures possibly hampering future Investigation or endangering witnesses. ► -11. Maintain memoranda containing facts of the case, background of suspect and victim, Including biographical data and photographs, and relevant items of human interest. 12. Maintain a file of case news clippings* for use -as required. 13. Serve as liaison officer between the Team Commander and the Officer in Charge relative to press releases and suggest means of using press facilities to assist the investigators. 14. Prepare information for press releases, which shall be released to the various news media only by the Officer in Charge and/or his Chief who shall only release Information agreed upon between the Team Commander, O.I.C. and the local Chief of Police. ATTACHMENT 4 DUTIES OF EVIDENCE OFFICER Photography of scene and each article of evidence. S. Scale drawing of scene. C. Gathering, identification and preservation of all physical evidence. 0. Arrangements for laboratory analysis of physical evidence and preparing for registered mailing of exhibits to other appropriate laboratories for examination. E. Maintaining a register of mall led exhibits in order to trace lost or mislaid packages. F. Protect the chain of custody for all evidence. G. Instruct all Team personnel in handling or preservation of evidence brought to their attention. H. Prepare reports setting out in detail his activities and findings. !. Proper preparation P p p for availability of equipment for marking and preservation of evidence. J. Making arrangements with the Officer in Charge for the storage and security of all evidence. } t i 0 j w Numb • .t Day Nu er Report• • Dept., ITIME NAME DEPT. RADIO MEAL AMT. GAS /OIL TIME IN N0. OUT • f eproved By Copies To. Chief Officer In Charge � ISIS ATMENT CASE TITLE REPORT IM PAGE # OF 'AD 1 Nl:ORMAT I ON REQUIRED OFF I CER /S DATEM ME DATEMME INITIAL ADD ITIONAL FINAL 0: ,. ASSIGNED LEAD .LEAD REPORT REPORT REPORT RECEIVED ASSIGNED GATE DUE IN V .• ' NAME/PLACE FILE. . ISIS - ��..c. NI+ME AGE _ — ADDRESS ,D.0.B. 1 /STATE A _ DATE OF CONTACT ON PAGES MISC. INFORMAT4 01; - 1NITIX INTERVIEW BY CITY OF 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY .7) -1 B ROO LYN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 TELEPHONE 561 -5440 C EINTT ER EMERGENCY- POLICE -FIRE 561 -5720 TO: Gerald G. Splinter City Manager FROM: Sy Knapp Director of Public Works DATE: October 15, 1979 RE: T. H. 252 and T. H. 610 Programming and Traffic Forecasts Attached hereto are: - a copy of BRW' "Build vs. No- Build" traffic assignments as distributed at the 9/11/79 Management Committee mee ting - a copy of BRW's "Staged Volume Estimates for Staged Construction of T.H. 610 /T.H. 252" report which I received on 10/11/79 From my discussions with Mr Charles Hudrlik, MXT' project manager for the EIS development, three points are noted: 1. The " project" which was included in M MOT's recently- announced cutback was an interim improvement project on West River Road between 65th and 73rd Avenue consisting of temporary traffic signal installations and minor geometric improvements of the roadway. 2. Construction of the T.H. 610 bridge, its connection to T. H. 10, and construction of T. H. 252 from I - 94 to T. H. 610 is regarded as one project (i.e., all or none) by MOOT. This is primarily because this project will be funded largely by "Interstate Substitution" funds. As such, NNDOT must meet the following deadlines or lose this funding source: EIS completed by September, 1983 Work under Contract by September, 1986 3. Development of the westerly extension of T. H. 610 to I -94 is not yet programsied. Accordingly, despite our protests, Brooklyn Center will almost certainly be forced to "live with" the higher traffic volumes which will result from staged construction (i.e., 109,000 upd on the I -694 bridge and 57,000 upd on T. H. 252). Please advise if you want me to set up any conferences with NNDOr ... or others. ? � ee �� S Y cb Attachments • � r COMPARISON OF TH 610/TH 252 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS Build Alternatives versus No -Build Alternatives Locations Bui TT No-Build Diff erenFe Bridges Anoka 49,000 58,000 +9 TH 610 77,000 0 77,000 I -694 97 000 128,000 +31,000 TOTALS 186 ;OOU 0 Links North of I- 694/I -94 County Rd. 18 29 29 0 TH 52 37,000 39,000 . +2,000 TH 152 43,000 43,000 0 TH 252 45,000 36,000 -9 . East River Road 15,000 24,000 +9,000 TH 47 30,000 38,000 +8,000, :. TH 65 .35,000 38,000 +3,000 ' BRW 9/11/79 s 4 L . ` r r IL 1�4 c••• 2 3 3 �I d �q a. �� O 78 ` J { 19 78 TRAFFIC VOLUMES 00- Daffy Trattla voh as Trunk Hwy. 610 &Trunk Hwy 169 110006 of v.nielsat LO CATION STUDY ,000 ifW .fpf 10M ..... •pOf. Ml ! r • `lie ti I M 4 �'� '� �'• • 1 • �'r �.T� .. T - 61 77 } ,7%7 ' �1 ' ' ! . No. a B CSAK 19frx u. .S UgaaafnG ano. Relocation a "'� (OBBBOBy -Pace) ^ d .Y.N \ • ri�' NawrH lOCrtewr Q � � Facr1� OnNa. Aepn• to a 17 �� NONE ro�aSw • �arrtraar nrnr /S � 'IS � ti:• � rmr 27 *� nnannr nn 'b �iia rw..:iir .l.BN w w N� • •��. .. - ...IlW.r NlHr.I B.N.. STB f �. MN• .M .N .NM..n... BB � w a _ �• s + x„3 76 75 " ..... ...::. #694 _jvr_Wx"roWn B �.,. , 19B:f.BarraYfR011y ro H. �� •• i YEAR 2000 TRAFFIC VOLUMES X00• Capp Tratflc Vohrn" Trunk Hwy. 610 &Trunk Hwy 169 Build Alternatives flows of Vim) LOCATION STUDY ' , , .l r }! _, a' ../Y:.•.T " ;y�� ..,: __r ; '` Brae: -�. ,.,. -.,► -. ,; � i', _ • -._ ,F t , jr r n 0 0 f N MAO r y i csaw tarn sa '. UppradlnQ •tl0 9' r Rt!.carton tl).goByP.�d i Y{ rq em an. f b C id, 4 wr wn+..wr rlrrr.. r w 2 tt y` � OfN Ott N.•wr0 b OO N t��. r 5 • � i _ t� i � q"hr. •• 194: Frim my Fitilily aO TH. Q 1 ' YEAR. 2000 TRAFFIC VOLUMES �►. oOy Tsafflo Vakm" Trunk Hwy. 610 &Trunk H wy 169 •� LOCATION STUDY No Build Alternative N °"' °''�'"' i � . ford r•» ..w ..» .r.. ,•ree.,r r i r` - i►�'�z'jT* • „'ti • r �7 `■ T � ' 1 ' • 2 4 j�j •: l t` TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TRAFFIC VOLUME ESTIMATES FOR STAGED CONSTRUCTION OF TH 610 /TH 252 TH 610 AND TH 252 (OLD TH 169) ROUTE LOCATION STUDY PREPARED FOR: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND NORTH CROSSTOWN /TH 252 MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE City of Blaine City of Maple Grove City of Brooklyn Center Anoka County - City of Brooklyn Park Hennepin County City of Champlin Metropolitan.Council 'City of Coon Rapids BY: BATHER- RINGROSE- WOLSFELD- JARVIS- GARDNER, INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA OCTOBER, 1979 o INTRODUCTION THe ability to construct TH 610 and TH 252 is dependent upon identifying a funding source.- Interstate Substitution funds have been allocated to TH 252 and the portion of TH 610 from TH 252 to new TH 10 in Coon Rapids. The westerly segment of TH 610 between I -94 in Maple Grove and TH 252 in Brooklyn Park does not currently have an identified funding,source. Therefore, a request has been made to estimate the future travel demand on the portion of TH 610 and TH 252 which might be constructed as a first stage. The principal area of concern is TH 252 (old TH 169) since the lack of a westerly extension of TH 610 is expected to increase the travel demand along TH 252. Changes in travel demand across the Mississippi River has also been examined. • • i GENERAL IMPACT OF NO WESTERLY EXTENSION OF TH 610 ON TRAVEL PATTERNS The analysis of the interim road network and the associated travel demand resulted in three general observations: 1. The lack of a westerly extension of TH 610 tends to increase travel demand on TH 252 (old TH 169). 2. The lack of a westerly extension of TH 610 also tends to increase travel demand on the north -south streets east of the Mississippi River and the I -694 bridge. 3. As long as a new bridge is constructed - across the Mississippi River and connects with TH 252 to the south, total travel demand will not be significantly reduced as is the case with the No -Build Alternative. It was found in the analysis that the major impact of not building TH 610 to the west was to divert this westerly oriented traffic to two alternative routes. One route alternative is to cross the TH 610 bridge "and use TH 252 to access I -94 and points west. The second route alternative is to use East River Road, TH 47, and TH 65 on the east side of the river to access I494 and to cross the I -694 bridge to continue westerly. The major impact of the No -Build alternative is to-reduce the total travel demand in the study area but; at the same time, to increase the traffic volumes on the Anoka bridge and the I -694 bridge. Because the intensity of new development is less for the No -Build alternative the resulting traffic; volumes on TH 252 (old TH 169) is reduced when compared to the build alter- natives at full development. COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC VOLUME ESTIMATES Three conditions are compared in terms of expected traffic flow across cross the Mississippi River•and along TH 252. These three conditions are: o Build TH 610 between I -94 and new TH 10 and upgrade TH 252 I o Build TH 610 between TH 252 and new TH 10 and upgrade TH 252 e Do not build TH 610 and retain TH 252 along existing West River Road. Table 1 summarizes the results of the traffic analysis for these three conditions. � r TABLE 1 TRAFFIC VOLUME ESTIMATES FOR THREE ROADWAY NETWORK CONDITIONS vehicles .( per day year 2000) c r CD 4, � � Build All TH 610 Build TH 610 Bridge No Location Upgrade TH 252 Upgrade TH 252 Build Anoka Bridge 58,000 58,000 67,000 TH 610 Bridge 77,000 65,000 0 I -694 Bridge 97,000 109,000 125,000 Total River Crossings 232,000 232,000 192,000 TH 252 45,000 57,000 36,000 (north of I -694) All of the volumes in Table 1 are on the high end 'of the range forecasts which are being prepared in response to concerns raised relative to energy and petroleum availability. Reductions of 10% to 30% are expected to occur as a result of reduced trips per person. i k , TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FRM Sy XMpp, Director of Rtl.ic Wsrks LATE: October 2, 1979 RE: Request for Traffic Signal. SysteQ- Brooklyn Bmwelard (T.H. 152) at 65th Avenue On Sephmtw 11, 1979, Vxs. Pat Benolkin of 4313 W Lane call©d to ask if there are any plans to install a traffic signal system at the intersection of Brooklyn Boulevard (T.H. 152) and 65th Avenue. Since the I have checked our records, and I have discussed the matter with our staff and with HMOT officials to come up with - the following report and evaluation: - Previous investigations have indicated that the intersection does meet the "traffic volaw errant" for installat3.on of a signal system. , --� The prinexy reasons for considering the installation of a signal system at this ?vocation is that the intersection is difficult to cross (for 65th Avenue traffic) and for pedestrians. There are some accidents at the intersection, hit it is nit considered a high hazard location (35 accidents have been reported there during the past 3h years, including 14 which are considerred "preventable" by the � in��taLtation of traffic signals) . �- Installation of a traffic control signal system could have some negative effects, i.e,: --It woUld reduce the efficiency of traffic flaw on Brooklyn Bmlevard. }. Some increase in rear -end accidents could be e>pected. -It could increase traffic on 65th Ave = and into the residential areas cn bath sides of Brooklyn RxAevard. } Fundin Sou rces: The estimated cost of a signal system is $120,000, and there are twee Foss hl.e funding sources: 1. `.Federal high - hazard safety funds. Wit: The acct xw rrds for this intersection don't begin to 1 qualify the project for these funds. 2. ' Foderal. Aid Urban Funds. ;jets The City has previously submitted applications for funding / this project from this source. The Metropolitan +Council considers such pro jects under two classifications, i.e., as "capacity improvammt" projects and as "F.A.U. Safety" pro jests, Mein to Gerald G. Splinter. Page 2 Ocbaber 2, 1979 I 7bS City's F.A.U. application was submitted as a safety proj but was denied because it didn't meet any of the funding criteria. Nl MOT personnel advised me that they do not think the project would be considered as a "Capacity infrovemmt" project because 8moklyn Boulevard has good capacity (in fact, signals would probably reduce capacity). 3. M DM /City funding, Wit~ MW District Traffic Enginew Nuke Fobinson advIses me that this project is rated 8th in MMOT's listing of pending traffic signal kq=vements, utilitang regular MDOr funds, and with City parti- cipation (i.e., a 50% rHMOT, 50% City cost sharing). On this basis, it appears the project might be attained within a year or two if it has the strong support of the City, o©n Ltment with a of S� `city s Swrary and Recx penhtions 91e intersection does meet the traffic volume warrant for installation of a signal system. Them are some obvious advantages and a few possible disadvantacies to installation of a signal system 7 e project has not qualified fccr Federal. Safety funds,, ,and so far has not gual.ified for F.A.U. funding. 7he City's choices appear to be limited to the following: Alternate 1: Decide to accept the status cluo for the forseeabie future, i.e., until and unless there are significant changes in the inter- section's perfornance, traffic volunes, land use, etc. Altermte 2: Attempt again to obtain F.A.U. funding, recognizing that our chances appear to be very low. Alternate 3: Designate this as a priority project act that the City will Pay 50% of the installation costs, and requesting NHmoT to install a signal system as soon as possible. Respectfully sullmitt�ed, t CITY OF 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY R(1('�jl j vhT BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 11W 77-7 ViJ�1JJ 1 1� TELEPHONE 561 -5440 CE N TER EMERGENCY- POLICE -FIRE 561 -5720 TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager FRCM: Sy APP. Director of Public Works DATE: October 19, 1979 RE: Petition for Sidewalk on John Martin Drive At the September 24, 1979, Council meeting, the City Council received the attached petition, signed by 108 persons. Attached hereto is a map of this general area of the City showing existing sidewalks (solid lines) and. those sidewalks which are definitely programmed for construction by the City and /or by the State Department of Transportation in conjunction with other improvement projects (Central Park Development, Shingle Creek Trailway Develop- ment, I -94 reconstruction, Municipal State Aid Street development, etc.). - My review of the City's sidewalk program shows that the sidewalk on John Martin Drive was included in a proposed sidewalk network plan as developed in 1971 by Don Poss, li City Manager and Jim Merila, Director of Public Works, but as a "third priority" sidewalk project. Apparently the intent was to install it as the need arose. As you know,the City's existing policy is to install sidewalks at City cost, with no special assessments levied to property owners. Conclusions and Recommendations 1. There is little doubt that the need for a sidewalk on John Martin Drive from Shingle Creek Parkway to Earle Brown Drive (LaBelle's, K -Mart, Perkins, etc.) has developed, as evidenced by the petition. The estimated cost for this seg- di hi ment, including the reshaping of scene landscaped mounds which exist in the � P� P� boulevard, is $18,000. 2. The proposed sidewalk on Summit Drive fulfills a different need, i.e., to allow pedestrians to travel from the City Hall /Civic Center /Central Park area to the Grandview Park,/Earle Brown School/Northbrook Shopping Center area." 3. The petition also asks for extension of the sidewalk to the Northbrook SbOPDXIc7 Center via John Martin Drive and the T.H. 100 exit ramp to 57th Avenue. The purpose for this extension would be to allow pedestrian traffic between the LaBelle/K- Mart /Perkins area and Northbrook Shopping Center. This purpose could also be served in other ways, and the need does not appear to be as immediate as for the first section. Accordingly, I recomTend that additional consideration be given to this segment before any definite comittments are made. 4. Consideration should be given to ultimate developent of a system which would provide sidewalks on both sides of most or all of the streets within this commercial /industrial area. Since this would primarily benefit the commercial/ 1174 $swa&v Vt o or# " Mein to Gerald G. Splinter Page 2 of 2 Pages I October 19, 1979 industrial establishments within the area, the City may wish to consider levying special assessments to cover at least a portion of these costs. In summary, I reccmmend that the Council tentatively ccmnit the City to the installation of sidewalk on one side of John Martin Drive between John Martin Drive and Earle Drown Drive in 1980 and to instruct the Administration to update the City's sidewalk installation program and policies so as to develop a more definite answer"to the re<raining questions. This initial ccmuittment should be in the form of a motion so that in the event a decision is made to levy special assessments for a portion of the costs, the formal order can be adopted at a later date. Respectfully Submitted, f ro cb ' cc: Forrest Castle, Shingle Creek Towers Attachments SEPTEMBER 6 1979 �I TO THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BROOKLYN CENTER: } F WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY PETITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO AUTHORIZE THE INSTALLATION OF A PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK ON JOHN MARTIN DRIVE BETWEEN SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY AND THE HIGHWAY 100 OVERPASS, AND ALONG THE HIGHWAY ENTRANCE RAMP TO 57TH AVENUE. THIS IS A LONGITANDIhG NEED OF THE RESIDENTS OF SHINGLE CREEK TOWER (6221 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY), MANY OF WHOM ARE INFIRM DUE TO AGE OR HANDICAPS. WE UNDERSTAND THAT A SIDEWALK IS BEING PLANNED FOR SUMMIT AVENUE, TO TIE IN WITH THE COMPLETION OF THE NEW PARK IN THIS AREA AS WELL AS THE SHINGLE CREEK PAR.IKWAY OVERPASS OVER I - 694, TO FACILITATE PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL FROM THE EAST SIDE OF HIGHWAY 100. THE- PROPOSED SIDEWALK WILL BE OF NO PARTICULAR USE TO THE RESIDa" TS OF SHINGLE CREEK TOWER, WHO NEED TO WALK OR WHEELCHAIR OVER TO THE BUSINESS PLACES ALONG JOHN MARTIN DRIVE AND AT NORTHBROOK SHOPPING CENTER. AT THIS TIME, THE ONLY WAY TO GET TO THOSE PLACES IS BY WAY OF THE STREET. WITH THE INCREASE IN TRAFFIC THAT IS SURE TO COME WITH THE NEW PARK AND OVERPASS, SUCH TRAVEL WILL BE EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS. A SIDEWALK ALONG JOHN MARTIN DRIVE IS ESSENTIAL AND MUST HAVE PRIORITY OVER THE SUMMIT AVENUE SIDEWALK. w �1M: old A l e t '-. - -e� "ov- MI -0 • Y�IM1[0AIIC[ TO PALMER € E BROOKLYN 4RK 07r" Wt Y OPEN SPJIftE 10 / t f Is t•oi :.:.i.K•...:7rn .NUN.u....w......w... N.... - .. si - fir a, •.` 1..... u .. J .. y.w( '.n •.. .NNNNNN. .... so HALL ---- -� t'° i� I 1 j '� -- i— __;____i_;."�"• ?�. , rte/ ' , f ',. GARDEN CITY .i PARK'' S•CR• ,, S SUrv7T �AIvr K C LIBRARY ` — ^: SITE . �.�-. nuN.w.N....Im ..N ............ w �— `� 11 -- {' r! / i ♦ - . 1 4 1w..N..N.N {.N•.N.NNN.,... ....1... {NNI pis. 11N .•.N. • ... .{..NI .. .{{ s. {.{ ..) 1.••.1... .. ^/. •i.7•rrerA l I Ctt LASELL K-MART Gan ov E,w s ' �•�" 4 �/ PARK mss/ Q r _wmmmnmo 4mmmommaimmosswu cm I FP over a S / i : 5900 /BROOKDALE 4 j FORD _ _ t om- �- \ 1 t 1♦ NNr.NNX.. • J.NNNN {.{I w..w 1 LCi E N N..w / j/ w ay. •...rrrrN vrr.r[ �[r.w� v�w.r c T .,, EXISTING 0 , 2 . I k .� _ •. t•�i.w 40ONEW IONS wttto "*to I SPAR � . r y- - � - •r E'er ' � yi• ��� ./� ",, ` - -j , i i _..+ HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PREPAREI? BY HENNEPIN EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS ORGANIZATION HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN 3 I, SECTION A GENERAL INFORMATION w MEMBERS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY 911 PLANNING COMMITTEE ROBERT BURESH DONALD HICKERSON THOMAS MORGAN Edina St. Anthony Richfield G. STEVENS BERNARD R. M. HENNEBERGER PERCY MORRIS Minneapolis Brooklyn Park St. Louis Park ROBERT BURLINGAME RICK HAMMOND GLEN OLSON Maple Grove Medicine Lake Golden Valley WALTER BENSON JACK HACKING DON OMODT Orono Eden Prairie Hennepin County Sheriff RICHARD CARLQUIST JOHN IRVING KENNETH PIERCE Plymouth Crystal Robbins dale JAMES CRAWFORD EARL JOHNSON JERRY PUTMAN Golden Valley South Lake Minnetonka Bloomington WILLIAM CRAIG CHARLES JOHNSON JOHN PIDGEON Hopkins Mound Bloomington DONALD DAVIS COLIN KASTANOS JAMES PIXLEY Brooklyn Park New Hope Metropolitan Airport HOWARD DROBNY LEONARD KOPP MARION ROE Minnetonka Mound Medicine Lake JOHN ELWELL MEL KILBO GERRY SPLINTER } St. Louis Parke Orono Brooklyn Center ROBERT ERICKSON OVIDE LA BERGS CRAIG SWANSON Maple Grove Hopkins Edina DALE FOLSTAD HARLAN LARSON RICHARD SETTER Hennepin County New Hope St. Louis Park TOM FALSTAD CARL LINDGREN ROLAND THURMAN Hennepin County Hennepin County Parks Robbinsdale ROBERT GREWELL JAMES LINDSAY DONALD VODEGEL Minnetonka Brooklyn Center Hennepin County Sheriff HARVEY HAVIR DR. ROBERT LONG KEITH WALL Minneapolis Hennepin County EMS Eden Prairie • ROBERT HANNON JAMES MOSSEY JAMES WILLIS Metropolitan Airport Crystal Plymouth r- HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN INTRODUCTION 911 is a three -digit telephone number that can be used to call for all public safety emergency services. It is a universal emergency number in that it is anticipated that 911 will be the number to call to obtain emergency service anywhere in the United States and Canada. 911 has many advantages, the most dramatic is that the present 100 emergency telephone numbers listed on the back of the cover of the Minneapolis telephone book will be re- placed with one - 911 v The 911 telephone system planned for Hennepin Clounty will automatically route emergency calls to one of twelve locations dependin g geographic ra on the eo hic area from which the call on - p g inated. These twelve locations will b e P termed the primary answering points.- In addition, there will be a number of secondary answering points that will dispatch emergency service personnel or provide services as a result of calls that are forwarded from the primary answering point by call extending or relaying. As a result, any person who calls 911 for an emergency service will be assured that their call will be routed to the appropriate agency quickly and efficiently. SYSTEM FEATURES After considering many alternative concepts, the following recommendations are made. A. 911 telephone service shall be available through every telephone in Hennepin County by December 15, 1982, assuming federal and other financing of the initial capital expenditures is obtained and an implementation contract is executed with the telephone companies prior to December 15, 1980. B. The change -over from the current seven -digit emer- gency numbers shall occur on a countywide basis except for the portions of the St. Michael, Delano, and Rockford telephone exchanges which are in y i Hennepin County but receive 911 telephone service from Wright County and except for the portion of Watertown exchange which is in Hennepin County but receives 911 telephone service from Carver County. C. The only calls for assistance that will be accepted on 911 lines are those of a nature which require the dispatching of public safety personnel or which require specialized personal emergency advice; all other calls shall be referred to the appropriate seven -digit administrative telephone number. D. The 911 emergency telephone service shall be provided through a system which is capable of automatic selective routing of any 911 call to an answering location which is predetermined by the location of the telephone from which the call originated. However, several exchanges are not scheduled for selective routing because the predicted relatively low call volume does not meet State qualifications for State payment of the costs of selective routing. E. The 911 system shall include "Automatic Number Identification" (ANI). Automatic number identification is a system feature that will automatically display the calling party's telephone number at the answering point while the call is in progress. F. Minnesota Statutes specify that by December 15, 1986, each public utility providing telephone service within a 911 service area shall convert every pay station telephone to permit dialing of the number "911" without coin or other charge to the caller. The telephone utilities which serve Hennepin County are encouraged to make this conversion in conjunction with the implementation of 911 service in the county. G. All primary answering points shall have the ability to extend any incoming 911 call over direct or dial - up outbound telephone lines." Primary answering point personnel may, at their option, remain connected to the extended conversation or disconnect to handle other calls. H. PSAP telephone equipment shall have a "hold" feature so that the 911 operator can place a call on hold while answering another call and, when practical, this equip- ment shall use "touchtone" signaling. I. The 911 system shall include the feature "forced disconnect" which will provide a method of disconnecting incoming 911 calls at the PSAP so as to prevent the busying of all incoming lines. The forced disconnect shall take place within 15 seconds of the time the PSAP operator terminates the call. J. It is recommended that a basic training and familiarization course be developed for dispatchers and telephone operators P P P P who work in the PSAPs. K. In the event that the 911 system cannot be used to call for service for any reason, the administrative seven- digit telephone lines at the PSAPs shall be available to receive emergency calls. A. suitable notice to this effect will be published in the telephone books. L. 911 calls cannot be selectively routed unless automatic number identification (ANI) data is transmitted properly. When ANI data is not received with a 911 call, the routing equipment will be programmed to _route that call to the PSAP which receives 911 calls from the greatest number of telephones in the telephone company central exchange b area. M. Automatic Location Identification (ALI) is a feature that will automatically display, at the answering point, the address of the telephone from which the 911 call originated, while the call is in progress. This feature has been considered as a option by the Hennepin Emergency Commu- nications Organization; however, no recommendation has been made because adequate cost information is not avail- able to evaluate the potential cost effectiveness of this + y, feature. Provisions have been made in the technical specifications to include ALI as an option thereby assuring a separate bid response that will identify the incremental additional cost of ALI. I _ 4 . • HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN _ SECTION B COUNTY MAPS HENNEPIN. COUNTY 'FINAL 911 PLAN LOCATION OF PSAPs 1- Brooklyn Center 2 - Robbins dale 1 3-Crystal l �1�-- - - - - -, 1 4- Hennepin County 5- Golden Valle /New Ho '� R'g`�`\\ pan °� e Y A 6- University of Minnesota > HassaN `` G3 7- Minneapolis { cna plin 8 -St. L oui s Park Manz,, ---- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - -A - - -- --- - - - - -- 9 - Hopkins 10-Edina t h 11- Richfield �lMapleLGrove Osxeo � 12-Bloomington ti Greenfield 1 Corcora Brooklyn Park ockford t 1 - 1 � r __ i Cen 1 w y - -- - -- - --- - -- - -- - - - - --- Loretto •- » F~1E NEPlN _1 y Cry at +�\ New r I l - 9 ' ; Mope y 1 rode ndentc Ply r th 1 Map P lain au 1 Medi 'ley i dal ke t fang akti' -_ -- -_--_- _- i ay:: Orono n - 1 e �' mi lis t°nka WoQcfar. - - L Park ' "'mot+ • n}�''r./,.... � a •. � 1 i td,n tonka 1 I aeo 01 U � �_ ins 4t. Bonitacies a: Shorewood y Edina 1 4 1 r Airport , 1 Eden Prairie as 1 �r Bloornwtgto s: A. r..... HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN - YT. MANLIi l TELEPHONE taTNTMtI ( L /NXYOO EXCHANGE AREAS i 1 Ns !? OAKGROY$ 4 t. r I ANOKA Co. .NANNY Mp4V�,R NAr LARt 7 [tiT LAK[ s � ►O NE W SCANOu r - . FOREST.LA ' 6 NASSAN DAYTON AN KA - ti IS NARIX C1IAM LIN COON RAROf' ` tit�if - T 1r j^ 1 : E CEMTtRY1LL [LAIN[ • " ¢.T 3 3 s «uco AND It 1�.. ._ v LEXINGTON CIRCLE ES & W SHINGTON CO. , DS ll G! Nn M EL� I COON MAPLE GROPE OUR - 1S VIEW tN REVI[W .274 1 22 STILIWATEA DGDOKLTN RK NORTH p { - NDIE +.e:1., 12 011X$ WHITESEAI 15 Ly7 HENNt?►IN C:0. r a ERQOKLTN f MEW VA AIs GR T T4NTER v 4 �24 I . lRIGNTON HE H T. AT ATE T w1y [�tgRETTO t t �l C f1 At ARO i v 4 V • : A NIL 1 �'` � S 1 � L1 � N[W IND NO ^CE y � C yoiy �. ,A . e- YMOUTH E'x 14 LITTLE 30 1 t 1 � AXAO XO t Y ROSE /LLL ST. 'PAUI BAYTOWN D MA +LE PLAIN v� .; _/. GOLDEN ¢¢o $ At 00 LAKE 11 A 11 OAKDALE ELKO ---�'. _ _ NG LAK It RA Ej ^ WAX AT y` • Y L 4 A «ELAND 1 ' ATERTOw. /fTJ.J l+TONR `LOUIE { "� . vvF •_„ • 1 2 LAKELAND 2 A T RK 'OLL WOOD waT y ®MIMS�ARONt ' j4Q AG 3 / v YJ M*U«D�. � lA � z ti j t t tI I O 1 . CROIX NA « 21 - - - ((','�� Af k yy WtsT OOOODURr 3 STF'DONIFA IUS , % A 1: �. t +* 19 ST. AF/ET�SON E! .1 �DIXA S i.I , AUt f 1N P S UTH NEWP Rfi IGHTS 46 t AIR 0R M[. G MAMT I +z• EL 0 RIC Nr1EL} 132 M[NOOTA UN IS" PAUL 9 4 :iNR11NAffLN .-w�L r '� I T ` N[ E�IQ C DEN I ONIA ONIA LAK OAF A. s�V • sDEN P /AIRIC I t,ti L_t T 6� �(y A �u . S �1 }t(' •� - BLOOMINGTON " VEO GROVE V CMAfKA t f EAOAN HEIGWTS COTTAGE GROVE OENMARN 59 JN rouR I JASKA ^ OAKOT CO. J`7 L7 r ANERI h3 ENARO►N i RWOOD� 1 ]� i EVER JACKSON XYRNSVIL I COLOGN� D REN I IAAMA" E y UNG AMERICA BENTON 61 L_ 7_ I I ' P ,1� AMLt VAIl [Oit 'lNININGER WASTING$ IS Igo I J 'wa.LG E. }. 1 •: w l 72 L..• 1 r - � SAN ANCISCO o I �F ( I 71 AgCOCK '} N L_ J L p V RMILLION I IRAVENNA SAND C EEK I SP ING LAKE I GRED/T' 1 ' 06 EM I MARS14AN .I. VEWIL ON !/ ►AtMI TAX I I ST -L aCE 1049A. SCOTT CO DELLS PLA [ t I T i ( rrrryryry...E�R TRICE BUKfLEY ( BELLE PLAINS `ELENA $...[E9( ( NEw MA•R`, AN ►TOM � a 1• I M O� I t CI, LA�E I � T I EKA ASTL 9 r /11YRiE _ l I del , NW NACRES, I I HAMPTON I DOUGLAS - V P I I 79 N RAGIMl .- _ �' 1'� "tLKO # - -- � - T - - �' T L � RANDOLPH R� I. A *LPN UU■ 1 r V JNEENVALE IW ATERfORD MILES S 10 15 20 J J 1 SCtOTA 1. Isenti 19. Fridley 37. _Bryant 54. Beard 71. Hastings 2. Elk River 20. Brooklyn Center 38. Granville 55. Hopkins 72. Rosemount 3. Oak Grove 21. Crystal 39. Penn 56. Excelsior 73. Apple Valley 4. Soderville 22. Fernbrook 40. Downtown 57. Victoria 74. Burnsville 5. Wyoming9 23. Hamel 41. 7th Avenue 58. Waconia 75. Orchard Gardens 6. Scandialarine 24. Maple Plain 42. Midway 59. Norwood 76. Prior Lake 7. Forest Lake 25. Rockford 43. Humbolt 60. Plato 77. Jordan 8. Coon Rapids 26, Delano 44. Beech 61, Cologne 78. Belle Plaine 9. Anoka 27. Watertown 45. Maplewood 62. Chaskka 79. LeSueur 10. Rogers 28. New Germany 46. St. Croix Beach 63. Shakopee 80. Eckles 11. Hanover 29. Winsted 47. Cottage Grove 64. Eden Prairie 81. New Market 12. Osseo 30. Lester Prairie 48. West St. Paul 65. Normandale 82. Lakeville 13. Spring Lake Park 31. Mayer 49. Market 66. 66th Street 83. Farmington 14. White Bear Lake 32. St.•Bonifacius 50. Emerson 67. Fort Snelling 84. Cannon Falls 15. Stillwater 33. Mound 51. 27th Avenue 68. South 85. Red Wing 16. North St. Paul 34. Navarre 52. Franklin 69. Cedar 86. Northfield 17. Rice 35. Wayzata 53. 38th Street 70. Lexington 87. Webster 18. Cleveland 36. Orchard Y HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN 5 - SECTION C "IDENTIFICATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINTS HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN Y PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINTS Minneapolis City Hall, Minneapolis Patrick Farrell 348 -2853 Golden Valley -New Hope 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley 55427 James Crawford 545 -3781 Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue, Richfield 55423 Thomas Morgan 866 -5061 Bloomington 2215 West Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington 55431 Jerry Putman 884 -3591 Hopkins 1010 First Street South, Hopkins 55343 Ovide LaBerge 938 -8885 Edina 4801 West 50th Street, Edina 55424 Craig Swanson 925 -2242 Crystal 4141 Douglas Drive, Crystal 55422 James Mossey 537 -8421 - Hennepin County Room 6, Court House, Minneapolis 55415 Don Omodt 348 -3740 Robbinsdale 4145 Hubbard Avenue, Robbinsdale 55422 Roland Thurman 537 -4554 Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy, Brooklyn Center 55430 James Lindsay 561 -5443 St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Blvd, St. Louis Park Richard Setter 920 -3001 University of Minnesota 2030 University Avenue, Minneapolis 55455 Eugene Wilson 373-4429 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN SECTION D f DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURES AND AGREEMENTS FOR RESPONDING TO 911 CALLS THAT ARE ROUTED TO A PSAP OTHER THAN THE ONE WHICH SERVES THE AREA FROM WHICH THE CALL ORIGINATED. DRAFT 10 -3 -79 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, f4ade and entered into between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, and the COUNTY OF CARVER, both bodies politic and corporate under the laws of the state of Minnesota; WHEREAS, the experience of public safety officials 'and other emergency service providers indicates that people generally do not know the proper telephone number to call to obtain police, fire or emergency medical assistance and WHEREAS, travelers and persons in unfamiliar neighborhoods do not know what jurisdiction they are in and, therefore, are unaware of which goverroiental agency is responsible for providing assistance to the area from which they are calling; and WHEREAS, the installation of a 911 telephone system will provide one common number to call to receive.` public safety assistance and will assure the caller that his request for assistance will be answered and the appropriate agency dispatched as a result of dialing 9 -1 -1; and WHEREAS, it is understood that because of costs and other factors some exchanges in the two counties will not be selectively routed and, therefore, 911 calls from portions of these exchanges will be routed to a dispatching center other than the one that serves the area from which the call originated. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions and covenants set forth herein, the County of Hennepin and the County of Carver agree as follows: ARTICLE I. GENERAL PURPOSE It is the purpose of this Agreement to establish + procedures for receiving 911 calls and for extending or relaying the calls to the proper dispatching center so that + the appropriate emergency service agency will provide assistance to the caller without requiring the caller to dial another number. ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS A: "Relay" or "Relayed" reans a' process whereby the telephone answerer receives the call, takes the information from the caller and thereafter transfers the .essential information to the dispatcher. In this procedure, the caller does not speak to the dispatcher. B. "Extend" or "Extended" means a process whereby the telephone answerer receives the call and mechanically or electronically connects the caller with the dispatcher. ARTICLE III. CONDITIONS A The services provided as a result of this Agreement are considered services to the general public and this Agreement shall not be construed to create an employer- employee, principal -agent or copartnership relationship between the parties. B. The'costs of operating the dispatch centers of Hennepin County and Carver County shall remain the responsibilities ° of the respective counties exce t as herein p ,. p provided. C. This Agreement applies to 911 telephone calls which originate from the Watertown exchange and are routed to the Carver County Dispatching Center and to calls which originate from the St. Bonifacius exchange and are routed to the Hennepin County Dispatching - .Center. ARTICLE IV. PROCEDURES A. 911 Calls originating in that portion of the Watertown exchange which is in Hennepin County will be received by the Carver County Dispatching Center and will be forwarded to the Hennepin County Dispatching Center. B. 911 Calls originating in that portion of the St. Bonifacius exchange which County will be received by the Hennepin County Dispatching Center and will be forwarded to the Carver County Dispatching Center. C. Each party shall accept 911 calls from the listed exchanges and shall answer the calls and may (shall) take the following action, as is deemed most appropriate: h 1. In cases when the request for service from the public can be accurately and expeditiously "relayed" to the dispatching center, the following information shall be relayed over dial -up or leased lines. a. Type of incident /action requested; b. Location or address where emergency service is needed; c. Corvunit or jurisdiction; p Y , J d Name and telephone hon e number of caller, 1 if known; e. Time call was received. ' 2. In cases when the emergency service to be rendered to the caller can be provided more expeditiously by having the caller speak directly to the dispatcher, the call will be "extended" to the dispatching center on dial -up or leased lines. 3. In cases, when, in the judgment of the person originally receiving the call, circumstances require immediate, direct contact with the dispatcher, the point -to -point radio may be used to relay a message. To the extent possible, the message format described in 1 above shall be used. w. D. In situations when the address or.the location of the incident are not clearly identified, the telephone answerer shall attempt to keep the caller on the line while relaying the message to the dispatcher. E. The `parties shall provide telephone service which will allow the public safety answering personnel to remain on the line as the third party when the calls are "extended" to the dispatching locating and the answering personnel can either remain connected to the conference call or can drop off the circuit without affecting the call in progress. F. If it is determined at a Later date that it is necessary to provide other telephone equipment or procedures so as to be able to.accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, amendments to this Agreement may be executed identifying the cost obligations of each party for such additional equipment or service. ARTICLE V. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE r RTIES In consideration of the mutual services provided herein, both parties agree that nothing contained herein is intended to be or should be construed in any manner at creating or establishing the relationship of copartners between the parties hereto or as constituting an agency relationship in any manner whatsoever. The individual • counties are and shall remain independent entities with respect to all services performed under this Agreement. Each county represents that it has, or will secure at its expense, all personnel required in performing its service obligation under this Agreement and that the acts of its employees performing the service under this Agreement shall be the acts of employees of that county alone. Each county covenants to hold harmless the other county for any and all claims whatsoever arising out of the acts or omissions of its,'officers, agents or employees while engaged in providing the above- enumerated mutual services. Each county agrees that in the performance of this mutual service its employees shall not require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the other county to this Agreement, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and.vacation leave, disability, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, severance pay and FERA. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this Agreement on the day of , 19 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF -, IINNESO-- By: Chairman of its County Board Upon proper execution, this Agreement will be legally valid and binding. And; Deputy County Administrator Assistant County Attorney ATTEST: Date: Deputy County Auditor APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: COUNTY OF CARVER, STATE OF MINNESOTA By.- Assistant County Attorney Its Date: Ana: Its APPROVED: Sheriff of Hennepin County Date: APPROVED: Sheriff of Carver County Date: HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN SECTION E - DESCRIPTIONS OF THE ROUTING AND SWITCHING CONFIGURATIONS AND THE TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS. , HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN The Hennepin County 911 plan, along with the plans of the other six P . counties of the Metropolitan area form the basis sis of the Specifications for 911 System in the Seven -Count P Y Y Minneapolis -St. Paul Metropolitan Region which is on file with the Department of Administration. This document describes one system that can provide the 911 telephone service which is described in this plan. A copy of the telephone industry cost estimates for this system is also filed with the Department of Administration. The Table on the next pages provides information about the telephone exchanges, the call routing, and fault routing directions for those exchanges that are to be selectively routed. By approving this plan, HECO members agree to receive the 911 calls which are misdirected due to an ANI fault and will notify he a ppropriate emer enc service agency, ther Y emergency g Y� Y assuring that the caller will receive the assistance requested without having to dial another number. 4 N }. Q CO Q w V LLJ H Ui ,�N WrL O CC z Cr c� ` ° � C d LL& w !- w p m O t7 >. W W J Q.�r <C C) WO L) EXCHANGE NAME — EXCHANGE LOCATION y W a o C) w x zt o (n CALLS ROUTED T0. . FAULT R TING T0: St. Bonifacius 2462 Commerce Blvd. 500 1,400 20 mi. .2 2 No Hennepin Co. Sheriff DNA Mound, MN Excelsior 560 2nd Street 7,647 21,412 11.5 mi 56 3 Yes Carver Co. Law Hennepin County Excelsior Enforcement Center Hennepin Co. Sheriff Granville 2643 Central Ave N.E. 23,288 65,206 0 mi. 25.4 4 Yes Anoka Co. Emergency Minneapolis Minneapolis Center Minneapolis Anoka 425 Monroe Street 14,752 41,306 10.5 mi 16.1 3 Yes Anoka Co. Emergency Anoka Co. Emergency Anoka Center Center Hennepin Co. Sheriff Brooklyn Center 1101 65th Ave No. 21,541 60 1.5 mi 23.5 4 Yes Anoka Co. Emergency Hennepin Co. Sheriff Brooklyn Center Center Brooklyn Center Hennepin Co. Sheriff Rogers Within city limits 1,266 3,545 20 mi. .5 2 No Hennepin Co. Sheriff Hanover ' Co. Rd. 10-A Co. Rd. 19 582 1,630 16 mi. :.2 2 No Hennepin Co. Sheriff Crystal 4700 Welcome Ave No. 24,276 67,973 1 mi. 2.6.5 4 Yes Hennepin Co. Sheriff Hennepin Co. Sheriff Crystal Crystal Brooklyn Center Robbinsdal Golden Valley Fernbrook 4120 Fernbrook Lane 5,137 14,384 6 mi. 5.6 2 No Hennepin Co. Sheriff Plymouth Hamel 3695 Pinto Dr. 745 2,086 10 mi. .8 2 No Hennepin Co. Sheriff -Maple Plain 1495 Budd Ave 1,579 4,421 15 mi. 1.1 2 No Hennepin Co. Sheriff page u. a Oto rr 61<9� H H V W G O N N . COc = 2- o CO /LH C3 (D ti DNm U- W 1` CDP 1= EXCHANGE NAME EXCHANGE LOCATION W a o CO W o z o N CALLS BOUTED ' I FAULI ROUTING TO: Mound 2462 Commerce Blvd 4,517 12,648 15 mi. 3.3 2 No Hennepin Co. Sheriff Navarre 3605 Shoreline Dr. 2,194 6,143 14.5 mi 1.6 2 No Hennepin Co. Sheriff Wayzata 162 North Central 12,827 35,916 9 mi. 14 3 No Hennepin Co. Sheriff Orchard 710 Mendelssohn Rd. 32,925 2,190 4 mi. 36 4 Yes Hennepin Co. Sheriff Hennepin Co. Sheriff Golden Valley Golden Valley Crystal St. Louis Park Bryant 816 21st Ave No. 9,612 2,914 0 mi. 32.3 4 Yes Golden Valley Minneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis Crystal Robbinsdale Penn 248 Penn Ave So. 1,287 1 0 mi 12.3 3 Yes Mi nneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis Golden Valley 24th Avenue 3301 24th Ave So. 30,5.08 36,674 0 mi. 33.4 4 No Minneapolis Franklin 2120 3rd Ave So. 21,305 i9,654 0 mi. 23.3 4 No Minneapolis 38th Street 3752 Pillsbury Ave 38,200 106,960 0 mi. 41.7 4 No Minneapolis Beard 4701 Beard Ave So. 1,467 16,091 0 mi. 45.3 .5 Yes Minneapolis Minneapolis St. Louis' Park Edina Hopkins 10 11th Ave No. 29,177 11,696 4 mi. 31.8 4 Yes Hopkins Hennepin Co. Sheriff Hopkins, St. Louis Park Edina Hennepin Co. Sheriff i�� N a @ N £ ,rVV) CO ad V � Lx t1 a U J 40 w� wF- w�CQ U. L" ?W C�' to Q Z CG d d Q D: h �' T M. w ,..,� ¢ .�v wa v cc z � � F- �. a mm w ". ►.� 1- d N N EXCHANGE NAME EXCHANGE LOCATION U4 0 o o w rn z o cwn CALLS ROUTED TO: FAULT ROUTING TO: Eden Prairie 10001 W. 78th Street 9,180 25,704 8 mi. 10 3 Yes Hennepin Co. Sheriff Hennepin Co. Sheriff Eden Prairie Edina Bloomington Normandale 4151 W. 84th Street 16,733 46,852 1 mi. 18.3' 3 Yes Bloomington Bloomington Bloomington Edina 66th Street 300 W. 66th Street 22,237 62,264 .5 mi 24.3 4 Yes Richfield Richfield Richfield Edina Minneapolis Fort Snelling 5857 43rd Ave So. 8,615 24,122 .5 mi 9.4 3 No Minneapolis South 400 W. 98th Street 22,634 63,375 4.5 mi 24.7 4 No Bloomington Ceder 2430 E. Old Shakopee Rd. 10,454 29,271 3 mi. 11.4 3 No Bloomington Glen Prairie 7825 Fuller Rd. 7,500 21,000 10 mi. .5 2 Yes Hennepin Co. Sheriff Hennepin Co. Sheriff Eden Prairie Carver Co. 7th Avenue 516 7th Ave S.E. 11,586 32,441 0 mi. 12.6 3' No Minneapolis 331, 373, 6 7th Avenue 516 7th Ave S.E. 20,654 57,831 O mi. 22.5 4 No Minneapolis 378, 9 Downtown 224 So. 5th Street 38,090 106,652 O mi. 41.6 4 No Minneapo is 332, 3,5,6,8,9 341,7,371 .Downtown 224 So. 5th Street 8,342 23,358 0 mi. 9.1 3 No Minneapolis 330, 348 Downtown - 340,4,370,2 224 So. 5th Street 20,919 58,573 0 mi. 22.9 4 No Minneapolis 5 Osseo Within city limits 1 7,220 120,216 1 10 mi.1 7.9 1 3 No l Hennepin Co. Sheriff • HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN SECTION CERTIFICATION BY THE COUNTY BOARD THAT THE PLAN MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THOSE PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES WHOSE SERVICES WILL BE AVAI.A BLE BY DIALING 9 -1 -1. TO; FROM; Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization In 1977 the Minnesota Legislature enacted a law which requires each county in the state to prepare and submit tentative 911 telephone system plans to the Department of Administration by December 15, 1978, and to submit final 911 plans by December 15, 1979. The counties in the Metropolitan Area are to have a 911 telephone system in operation by December 15, ` 1982. Each county board is responsible for the development of these plans and each board has appointed a 911 planning committee. In Hennepin County, the Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization (HECO) has been designated the 911 planning committee. HECO is in the process of preparing the final county 911 plan. The tentative action by the HECO Board of Directors is to include in the county 911 plan only those telephone features which qualify for state payment of their recurring costs. i The rules published by the Department of Administration regarding 911 service in Minnesota require a certification ... "from the County Board that the (9 11) plan meets the requirements of those public service agencies whose services will be available by dialing 911 ". It is the intent of the 911 planning committee to provide the public with direct telephone access to a dispatching center which will notify the appropriate police, fire, or emergency medical services agency. The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the process for submitting the final plan and to offer you the opportunity to comment on the plan. To facilitate the certification process by the County Board, -I request that you complete the attached form and return it to me at the address below before November 1, 1979. Your response, along with those of other emergency service agencies, will be attached to the final plan that is submitted to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. DON OMODT President Hennepin Emergency Communications Organization A -2308 Hennepin County Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 • September 17, 1979 TO: Hennepin County Board of Commissioners FROM: (Agency Name) (Agency Address) I have reviewed the 911 plan for Hennepin County and believe the plan will provide a direct means for public requests for assistance on the 911 telephone system to be routed to the appropriate emergency service agency. Therefore, this agency endorses the 911 plan for Hennepin County. (Signature of Agency Director) HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN SECTION G AGENCIES WHOSE SERVICES WILL BE AVAILABLE BY DIALING 9-1-1. HENNE PIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN ' PSAP: MINNEAPOLIS Area Served: The City of Minneapolis and the Fort Snelling telephone exchange excluding the 373 and 376 exchanges. Names of: Agency & Person In Telephone Services Dispatching Dispatchigg Procedures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency l of Agency I Provided Current With 911 Minneapolis Police Department Room 119, - City Hall, 348 -2853 Police Direct. Direct Donald Dwyer Minneapolis 55415 Minneapolis Fire Department Room 230 City Hail, 348 -2890 Fire Direct Direct Clarence Nimmerfroh Minneapolis 55415 Hennepin County EMS 701 Park Avenue 347 -2913 EMS /Amb CAD /Direct CAD /Direc Dr. Robert Long Minneapolis Airport Police Department Metropolitan Airport, 726 -1177 Police Direct Telephone James Pixley St. Paul 55111 Airport Fire Department Metropolitan Airport, 726 -1300 Fire Direct Telephone Robert Hannon St. .Paul 55111 Veterans Administration Police V. A. Hospital, 726 -1355 Police Direct Telephone r Thomas Smith Minneapolis 55417 Veterans Administration Fire V. A. Hospital, 726 -1166 Fire Direct Telephone John Sloan Minneapolis 55417 US Federal Protective Service Federal Bldg Room 103, 725 -4444 Police Direct Telephone Mike Edwards Fort Snelling, St. Paul, 55111 Minnesota Highway Patrol Room 107 Transportation Bldg. 482 -5901 Police Telephone Telephone James Crawford St. Paul 55155 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN V PSAP: GOLDEN VALLEY Area Served: The Cities of Golden Valley and New Hope. Names of: Agency & Person in Telephone' Services Dispatching Procedures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency_ of Agency Provided Current With 911 Golden Valley Police Department 7800 Golden Valley Road, 545 -3781 Police Direct Direct James Crawford Golden Valley 55427 Golden Valley Fire Department 7800 Golden Valley Road 545 -3781 Fire Direct Direct James Crawford Golden Valley 55427 New Hope Police Department 4401 Xylon Avenue, 533 -5311 Police Direct Direct Colin Kastanos New Hope 55428 New Hope Fire Department 4401 Xylon Avenue, 533 -5311 Fire Direct Direct William Reimer New Hope 55428 Hennepin County EMS 701 Park Avenue, 347 -2913 EMS /Amb Telephone Telephone Dr. Robert Long Minneapolis Minnesota Highway Patrol Room 107, Transportation Bldg, 482 -5901 Police Telephone Telephone James Crawford St. Paul 5.5155 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN ` PSAP: RICHFIELD Area Served: The City of Richfield. Names of: Agency & Person In Telephone Services Dispatching Pro cedures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 Richfield Police Department 6700 Portland Avenue, 866 -5061 Police Direct Direct Tom. Morgan Richfield 55423 Richfield Fire Department 6700 Portland Avenue, 866 -5061 Fire Direct Direct Tom Morgan Richfield 55 Hennepin County EMS 701 Park Avenue, 347 -2913 EMS /Amb Telephone Telephone Dr. Robert Long Minneapolis Minnesota Highway Patrol Room 107 Transportation Bldg. 482 -5901 Police Telephone Telephone James Crawford St. Paul 55155 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PSA P: BLOOMINGTON Area Served: The City of Bloomington. Names of: Agency & Person'In Telephone Services Dispatching P roc ed ures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 Bloomington Police Department 2215 West Old Shakopee Road 884 -3591 Police Direct Direct Jerry Putman Bloomington 55431 Bloomington Fire Department 2215 West Old Shakopee Road 881 -5811 Fire Direct Direct George Hayden Bloomington 55431 Bloomington Rescue Squad 2215 West Old Shakopee Road 881 -5811 Rescue Direct Direct Dave Dodds Bloomington 55431 Hennepin County EMS 701 Park Avenue, 347 -2913 EMS /Amb Telephone Telephone Dr. Robert Long Minneapolis Minnesota Highway Patrol Room 107 Transportation Bldg. 482 -5901- Police Telephone Telephone James Crawford St. Paul 55155 Hennepin County Park Rangers P.O. Box 296, 473 -4693 Police Telephone Telephone Carl Lindgren Maple Plain 55357 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PSA P: HOPKINS Area Served: The City of Hopkins. Names of: Agency & Person In Telephone Services Dispatching Procedures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 Hopkins Police Department 1010 First Street South, 938 -8885 Police Direct Direct Ovide LaBerge Hopkins 55343 Hopkins Fire Department 1010 First Street South 938 -8885 Fire Direct Direct Ed Lundgren_ Hopkins 55343 Hennepin County EMS 701 Park Avenue, 347 -2913 EMS /Amb Telephone Telephone Dr. Robert Long Minneapolis Minnesota Highway Patrol Room 107 Transportation Bldg. 482 -5901 Police Telephone Telephone James Crawford St. Paul 55155 i HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN I PSAP: EDINA Area Served: The City of Edina. Names of: Agency & Person In Telephone Services Dis atching Procedures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 Edina Police Department 4801 West 50th Street, 925 -2242 Police Direct Direct Craig Swanson Edina 55424 Edina Fire Department 4801 West 50th Street, 925 -2242 Fire /EMS Direct Direct Robert Buresh Edina 55424 Hennepin County EMS 701 Park Avenue, 347 -2913 EMS/ Amb Telephone Telephone Dr. Robert Long Minneapolis Minnesota Highway Patrol Room 107 Transportation Bldg. 482 -5901 Police Telephone Telephone James Crawford St. Paul 55155 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PSAP: CRYSTAL Area Served: The City of Crystal. Names of: Agency & Person in Telephone _ Services Dispatching Procedures Charge of the Agency Mailin Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 Crystal Police Department 4141 Douglas Drive, . 537 -8421 Police Direct Direct James Mossey Crystal 55422 Crystal Fire Department 4141 Douglas Drive, 537 -8421 Fire Direct Direct Dean Berner Crystal 55422 Hennepin County EMS 701 Park Avenue, 347 -2913 EMS /Amb Telephone Telephone Dr. Robert Long Minneapolis Minnesota Highway Patrol Room 107 Transportation Bldg. 482 -5901 Police Telephone Telephone James Crawford St. Paul 55155 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PSAP: HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Area served: Hennepin County excluding the geographic areas of the cities of Minneapolis, Bloomington,` Richfield, Edina, St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Golden Valley, New Hope, Crystal, Robbinsdale, Brooklyn Center, the Airport -Fort Snelling area, the 373 and 376 exchanges, and those portions of the county that receive telephone service from the St. Michael, Rockford, Delano, and Watertown exchanges. Names. of: Agency & Person in Telephone Services Dispatching Procedures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 Hennepin County Sheriff's Dept. Room 6, Court House 348 -3740 Police Direct Direct Don Omodt Minneapolis, 55415 Brooklyn Park Police Department 5700 - 85th Avenue North, 425 -4513 Police Direct Direct Donald Davis Brooklyn Park 55443 Brooklyn Park Fire Department 5800 - 85th Avenue North, 425 -4502 Fire Direct Direct Lyle Robinson Brooklyn Park 55443 Hennepin County Water Patrol Room 6, Court House 348 -3740 Police Direct Direct Don Omodt Minneapolis 55415 Osseo Police Department 415 Central Avenue, 425- 2624 Police Direct Direct Gerald Ge'tchell Osseo 55369 Maple Grove Police Department 9401" Fernbrook Lane, 425 -4521 Police Direct Direct Robert Burlingame Maple Grove 55369 Maple Grove Fire Department 9401 Fernbrook Lane, 425 -4521 Fire Direct Direct Roger Kuchera Maple Grove 55369 St. Anthony Police Department 3301 Silver Lake Road, 789 -8882 Police Direct Direct Donald Hickerson St. Anthony 55418 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PSAP: HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Names of: Agency & Person In Telephone Services Dispatching Procedures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 Mound Fire Department 5341 Maywood Road, 472 -1155 Fire Direct Direct Eugene Jarvis Mound 55364 Orono Police Department 1285 South Brown Road, 473-7710 Police Direct Direct Melvin Kilbo P.O. Box 86, Crystal Bay 55323 _ Wayzata Police Department 600 Rice Street, 473 -0234 Police Direct Direct Arnold Vodegel Wayzata 55391 Wayzata Fire Department 600 Rice Street, 473 -0234 Fire Direct Direct Bruce Day Wayzata 55391 ' Hennepin County Park Rangers P.O. Box 296, 473 -4693 Police Direct Direct Carl Lindgren Maple Plain 55357 Rogers Fire Department 428 -4107 Fire Direct Direct Steve Scharber Rogers 55374 Loretto Fire Department 479 -2469 Fire Direct Direct Ken VanBeusekom Loretto 55357 Excelsior Fire Department 339 Third Street, 474 -5233 Fire Direct Direct Steve Bauman Excelsior 55331 West Hennepin Public Safety 1570 Halgren Road, 479 -3175 Police Direct Direct James Franklin Maple Plain 55359 Champlin Police Department 12001 Highway #52, 421-8064 Police Direct Direct Donald Galloway Champlin 55316 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PSAP: HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Names of. Agency & Person In Telephone Services Dispatching P rocedures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 Plymouth Police Department 3400 Plymouth Road 559 -2800 Police Direct Direct Richard Carlquist Plymouth 55441 Plymouth Fire Department 13205 County Road 6, 559 -2800 Fire Direct Direct Francis Bauer Plymouth .55441 St. Anthony Fire Deparment 2900 Kenzie Terrace, 788- -4885 Fire Direct Direct Monroe Hall St. .Anthony 55418 ' Minnetonka: Police Department 14600 Minnetonka Blvd., 933 -2511 Police Direct Direct Howard Drobny Minnetonka 55343 Minnetonka Fire Department 14600 Minnetonka Blvd., 933 -2511 Fire Direct Direct Herb Weckman Minnetonka 55343 Hennepin County EMS 701 Park Avenue, 373 -2913 EMS Telephone Telephone Dr. Robert Long Minneapolis Eden Prairie Police Department 7905 Mitchell Road, 937 -2700 Police Direct Direct Jack Hacking Eden Prairie 55344 Eden Prairie Fire Department 7905 Mitchell Road, 937-2700 Fire Direct Direct "Jack Hacking Eden Priarie 55344 South Lake Minnetonka Police 143 Oak Street, 474 -3261 Police Direct Direct Earl Johnson Excelsior 55331 Corcoran Police Department 425-5566 Police Direct Direct George Hudak Hamel 55340 Mound Police Department 5341 Maywood Road, 472 -3711 Police Direct Direct Charles Johnson Mound 55364 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PSAP: HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Names of: Agency & Person In Telephone Services Dispatching Procedures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 Medina Police Department 2052 County Road 24, 473 -4643 Police Direct Direct Charles Hoover Hamel 55340 Deephaven Police Department 20225 Cottagewood Road, 474.7555 Police Direct Direct James Anderson Excelsior 55331 Medicine Lake Fire Department 10609 South Shore Drive 370 -3343 Fire Direct Direct Marion Roe Medicine Lake 55441 Osseo Fire Department 415 Central Avenue, 425 -2624 Fire Direct Direct Peter Phenow Osseo 55369 Rogers Police Department PO Box 35 428.2461 Police Direct Direct Dennis Miltz Rogers, 55374 I Minnesota Highway Patrol Room 107 Transportation Bldg., 482 -5901 Police Telephone Telephone James Crawford St. Paul 55155 Hanel Fire Department 92 Hamel Road 478 -6863 Fire Direct Direct Julius Dorweiller Hamel 55340 Long Lake Fire Department 1964 Park Avenue, 473 -9701 Fire Direct Direct Lyle Day Long Lake 55356 Dayton Police Department 16471 South Diamond Lake Rd. 427 -4589 Police Direct Direct Tom Davison Dayton 55327 Dayton Fire Department 16471 South Diamond Lake Rd. 428 -2964 Fire Direct Direct Bob Leger Dayton 55327 HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PSAP: HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Names of: Agency & Person In Telephone Services Dispatching Procedures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 Greenfield Police Department P.O. Box 418 477 -6464 Police Direct Direct Vernon Daluge Rockford 55373 Rockford Fire Department Rockford, 55373 477 -6565 Fire Telephone Telephone Walter Mutterer Anoka Fire Department 2015 First Avenue, 421 -6631 Fire Telephone Telephone Doug Freeby Anoka 55303 Watertown Fire Department Watertown, 55388 955 -2681 Fire Telephone Telephone Marvin Salonek St. Bonifacius Fire Department City Hall 446 -1261 Fire Direct Direct Florian Eder St. Bonifacius 55375 Maple Plain Fire Department 1,620 Maple Avenue 479 -1123 Fire Direct Direct Charles Corpe Maple Plain 55359 r HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PSAP: ROBBINSDALE Area Served: The City of Robbinsdale. Names of. Agency & Person In Telephone Services Dispatching Procedures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 4 Robbinsdale Police Department 4145 Hubbard Avenue, 537 -4554 Police Direct Direct Roland Thurman Robbinsdale 55422 Robbinsdale Fire Department 4145 Hubbard Avenue, 537 -4554 Fire Direct Direct Tom Sipe Robbinsdale 55422 Hennepin County EMS 701 Park Avenue, 347 -2913 EMS /Amb Telephone Telephon� Dr. Robert Long Minneapolis Minnesota Highway Patrol Room 107 Transportation Bldg. 482 -5901 Police Telephone Telephon James Crawford St. Paul 55155 R j e { HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PSAP: BROOKLYN CENTER Area Served: The City of Brooklyn Center. Names of: Agency & Person In Telephone Services Dispatching Procedur Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current j With 911 Brooklyn Center Police Dept. 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, 561 -5443 Police Direct Direct James Lindsay Brooklyn Center 55430 Brooklyn Center Fire Department 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, 561 -5440 Fire Direct Direct Ronald Boman Brooklyn Center 55430 Hennepin County EMS 701 Park Avenue 347 -2913 EMS /Amb Telephone Telephone Dr. Robert Long Minneapolis Minnesota Highway Patrol Room 107 Transportation Bldg. 482 -5901 Police Telephone Telephone James Crawford St. Paul 55155 ' i HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PSA P: ST. LOUIS PARK Area Served: The City of St. Louis Park. Names of: Agency & Person In Telephone Services Dispatching Proc edures Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 St. Louis Park Police Department 5005 Minnetonka Blvd," 920 -3000 Police Direct Direct Richard Setter St. Louis Park 55416 St. Louis Park Fire Department 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. 920 -3000 Fire Direct Direct Omar McGary St. Louis Park 55416 Hennepin County EMS 701 Park Avenue 347 -2913 EMS /Amb Telephone Telephone' Dr. Robert Long Minneapolis Minnesota Highway Patrol Room 107 Transportation Bldg. 482 - 5901 Police Telephone Telephone James Crawford St. Paul 55155 i HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN PSAP: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Area Served: University of Minnesota properties - the 373 and 376 exchanges. Names of: Agency &Person In Telephone Services Dispatching Procedure Charge of the Agency Mailing Address of Agency of Agency Provided Current With 911 University Police Department 2030 University Avenue, 373 -4429 Police Direct Direct Eugene Wilson Minneapolis 55455 Minneapolis Fire Department Room 230, City Hall, 348 -2890 Fire Telephone Telephon( Clarence Nimmerfroh Minneapolis 55415 Hennepin County EMS 701 Park Avenue, 347 -2913 EMS /Amb Telephone Telephone Dr. Robert Long Minneapolis St. Paul Fire Department 101 East 10th Street, 224 -7811 Fire Telephone Telephone Steve Conroy St. Paul 55101 ' Minnesota Highway Patrol Room 107 Transportation Bldg. 482 -5901 Police Telephone Telephone James Crawford St. Paul 55155 r r HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN SECTION H DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD OF PROVIDING TELEPHONE SERVICE IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE OF ALL OR PART OF THE 911'SYSTEM OR A FAILURE OF THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF ELECTRIC POWER AT THE PSAP. , .s HENNEPIN COUNTY FINAL 911 PLAN SECTION - H Prior to the implementation of 911 telephone service, there will be an extensive program to advertise the use of 911 through television and radio spots, billboards, newspaper ads, and direct mailings all of which are intended to acquaint the public with the new service. In addition, there will be a notice inside the front cover of the telephone book that emphasizes that 911 is the number to call to obtain emergency assistance. Included with this notice will be instructions to the effect that if there is a failure of the 911 telephone system, the caller may dial the appropriate seven -digit administrative telephone number to request emergency assistance. This notice will clearly state that the use of the administrative number to request emergency assistance is limited to those times when all or part of the 911 system is out of service. All governmental units that operate PSAPs in Hennepin County provide standby electrical power to the dispatch center during interruptions in normal electric service and it is planned that appropriate arrangements will be made during the installation of the 911 system to provide standby electrical power to operate the telephone equipment in the PSAP during a failure of the normal electric service. M & C No. 79 -27 October 19, 1979 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Subject: City Manager - Professional and Lobbying Activity To the Honorable Mayor and City Council: During the last week I reviewed with various department heads their activity in professional associations, League committees, and other activities which could generally be classified as lobbying activity. This lobbying activity may be with the Legislature through their professional associations or with the Metro Council or other State and County agencies. It has been my practice to conduct this review periodically to make sure that certain areas in which the Council has expressed an interest in terms of Policy development, that c1' P City department heads are involved in those areas and keeping themselves up to date and informed on any potential changes. An additional purpose of my review was to see if there was any duplication of our efforts. As City Manager I am active in the following areas: Secretary- Treasurer - Minnesota City Managers Association; Chairman - Metro Area Managers Association (MAMA) Public Safety Committee; Chairman, MAMA Joint Police Negotiating Committee; Member of State League and Metro Association Revenue Committee; I serve the State League and Metro League on various ad hoc steering committees (State Aid Formula, Levy Limit Modifica- tion); and Vice President LOGIS. Of the above mentioned activities by far the most time consuming for me was the MAMA Joint Police Bargaining Committee chairmanship. However, that has a periodic impact on my time because now there is a two year contract. A very close second in terms of time consumption and effort are the ad hoc committees of the State and Metro Leagues. In particular, the State Aid Formula Steering Committee was time consuming; however, I think the end result, which was the new State aid formula, was well worth the expenditure of time. I am now serving on a similar steering committee as'it relates to levy limit modification. Time spent by myself`in these areas and that of the department heads does not appear to be excessive. I am thoroughly convinced it is very important for myself and the department heads, and at times the City Council, to be active in these various areas ` as when there is a reed for input on behalf of Brooklyn Center, there is not always the opportunity to get appointed to the involved committee. You have to make 'a continuous effort at serving on these committees so that when there is a time when t there can be benefit to Brooklyn Center or to other municipalities, you have the opportunity to provide the necessary advice. If any of the members of the City Council should ever wish to become active in any given area, it would be a good idea to check with me as to whether or not some of the department heads or myself are not already expending time in that area. If it is the case; adjustment can either be made one way or the other to provide that-there would be no duplication of effort on behalf of Brooklyn Center. ;eral e 4G.plinter ed, City Manager CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Licenses to be approved by the City Council on October 22, 1979 </ ITINERANT FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE Fabian Seafood Company Galveston, TX (6245 Brooklyn Boulevard) Sanitarian MECHANICAL SYSTEM'S LICENSE SBS Mechanical, Inc. 7160 Madison Ave. W. Build' g Official