HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979 01-22 CCP Regular Session CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
City of Brooklyn Center
January 22, 1979
7;00 p.m.
1. Call to Order
2 . Roll Call
3 . Invocation
4. Approval of Minutes - January 8, 1979
5. Open Forum
S • Appointments
a. Planning Commission
-The term. of Mr. Harold Pierce expired December 31, 1978. Mr. Pierce
has indicated a willingness - to serve another term.
7. Planning Commission Items (8.00 p.m.),
a. Application No. 79002 submitted by Janis Blumentals for BCIP for site
and building plan approval for an approximate A, # - square foot specula -
tive building at 67 Avenue North and Shingle Creek Parkway. The
application was recommended for approval at the January 11, 1979
Planning Commission meeting.
b. Application No. 79003 submitted by Harold J. Westin & Associates for
site and building plan approval for an approximate 7,700 square foot
addition to - the Group Health Clinic at 6845 Lee ,Avenue North. The
application was recommended for approval at the January 11, 1979
Planning Commission meeting.
8. Resolutions:
a. Pertaining to Technical and Engineering Assistance Agreement with the
State of Minnesota Department of Transportation
-The attached draft resolution is adopted annually providing the capability
for 'the City Engineer to request and obtain from - the Minnesota Department
of Transportation needed engineering and , technical services during the
coming year. The resolution authorizes the Mayor and City manager - to
enter into such an agreement and further authorizes - the City Engineer to
act for and on behalf of - the City of Brooklyn Center in making such requests
b. Pertaining - to Agency Agreement with the State of Minnesota Department of
Transportation
-The attached draft resolution provides for appointing - the Commissioner of
Transportation - to act as the Ci•t',,r's agent in accepting federal aid in the
City's behalf for road and bridge construction and in contracting for - the
construction financed either all or in part by federal funds. The agreement
that the City would be entering Into is a standard agreement prepared by
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2 January 22, 1979
the State aid division of MN /DOT for execution by the numerous
municipalities participating in 'the Federal Aid Urban Program. The
resolution and agreement is necessary for proceeding with the con -
struction of a pedestrian /bicycle bridge across Highway 100 from
Summit Avenue to 59th Avenue North. The City entered into the same
type of agreement with MN /DOT in January; 1978. The new agreement
provides for the agreement to remain in effect until canceled by either
party.
c. Accepting Work for Street Grading, Base and Surfacing Improvement
Project No. 1977 -17
-The work for - the project has been satisfactorily completed by C. S.
McCrossan, Inc. under Paving Contract 1977 -j. The project is
located on Unity Avenue North northerly of 69th Avenue in Phase II
-of - the Ponds Development Project.
d. Accepting Work for Curb and Gutter, Improvement Project No. 1977 -18
-The work for the project has been satisfactorily completed by C. S.
McCrossan, Inc. under Paving Contract 1977 -1. The project is located
on Unity Avenue North northerly of 69Th Avenue in Phase II of - the Ponds
Development Project.
e. Accepting Work for Street Base Improvement Project No. 1978 -2B
-The project is located on 70th Avenue North from Brooklyn Boulevard
easterly -to future Kyle Avenue North.
f. Accepting Work for Street Base Improvement Project No. 1978 -20B
-The location of the project is on Irving Avenue from 70th Avenue
southerly - to Irving Lane, and Irving Lane from Irving Avenue westerly.
g. Accepting Work for Street Base Improvement Project No. 1978 -24B
-The project is located on Aldrich Avenue North from the cul-de-sac north.
h. Accepting Work for Street Base Improvement Project No. 1978 -27B
- Located on James Circle from Freeway Boulevard southerly - to the cul -de-
sac. The work on 'the four projects as listed in Resolutions 8e 'through
8h has been satisfactorily completed by United Asphalt Co. , Inc. under
Paving Contract No. 1978 -I.
i. Establishing Storm Sewer Improvement Project 1979 -2 and Ordering
Preparation of Plans and Specifications
-In conjunction with proposed street project along 53rd Avenue North
it is recommended - that storm sewer revisions and additions be
accomplished at - this time.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- January 22, 1979
j. Establishing Water Main Improvement Project No. 1979 -1 and Ordering
Preparation of Plans and Specifications
-In conjunction with - the proposed street project along 53rd Avenue North
it is recommended that water main be installed at 53rd Avenue North from
Bryant Avenue - to 4th Street North.
k. Approving the Purchase of 2,00b Ft. of 1 -1/2 Inch Fire Hose and
2,000 Ft of 2 -1/2 Inch Fire Hose
-Fire hose was included in the 1979 fire department capital outlay budget.
1. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation for the Dedicated Public Service
of Michael Schroeder
m. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation for 'the Dedicated Public Service
of Sylvia Winkelman
n. Expressing Recognition of and Appreciation for the Dedicated Public Service
of Vi Kanatz
o. Renewing Insurance Contract
p. Approving the Purchase of One Pickup Truck for Public Utilities
9. Discussions Items;
a. Special HRA Legislation for Brooklyn Center -
-A proposed bill has been drafted by Jim Holmes which would authorize
the City of Brooklyn Center to use HRA money for rehabilitation grants
and loans
b. Proposed Charter Amendments
Memorandum has been prepared which summarizes the points of agreement
and disagreement between - the City Council and - the Charter Commission
concerning - the proposed Charter amendments.
c. Critical Areas Plan
- Council has received - the Critical Areas Plan Document, Approval of
document will be considered.
d Standardized Pay Schedule for Part -time Clerical Employees
- Informational item. No Council action is required.
e Local Board of Equalization
- Council should set a date, - time -and location for the Local Board of
Equalization meeting. A date in - the week of June 4, 1979 is recom-
mended.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -4- January 22, 1979
f. Cable Television
- Northern Cable Television, Inca is presenting a proposal asking for
approval of a CST consisting of - the municipalities of Golden Valley,
Robbinsdale, Crystal, New Hope, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park,
Osseo, Plymouth and Medicine Lake. A representative of Northern
Cable Television, Inc. would be available - to explain - the proposal if
the City Council requests.
g. Approval of Animal Patrol Contract
-It is recommended a motion by - the City Council be made approving - the
1979 contract with Municipal and Private Services, Inc: (MAPSI) for
animal control.
h. Agreement with Hennepin County , to Provide Community Health Services
, Under the Community Health Services Act of 1976
-A motion is recommended approving the agreement. The agreement is
essentially - the same as in 1977 and 1978 and allows the City •to use
Community Health Services subsidy funds - to support environmental
health activities within the City of Brooklyn Center.
10. Rental License
a. Temporary extension of rental license for a 4 -plex located at 5328 - 4th
Street North owned by Robert Bobletter.
Temporary extension of rental license through April, 1 is recommended.
11. Licenses
12 Adjournment
{
DEANA. NYQUIST CITYHALL t
Mayor Y 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Res: 533.0774 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Bus: 566 -7420 Telephone 612/561 -5440
MOWN
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
January 15, 1979
TO: COUNCIL MEMBERS
I will be submitting the name of Dan Erickson
as a replacement for Debbie Jacobson on the
Planning Commission. Dan lives at 5324 Boulder
Lane in Brooklyn Center. we have a number of
applications, however, we should obtain some-
one from the westerly area to keep the geography
somewhat balanced.
I have personally known Dan for more years than
I care to admit. In fact we roomed together
in college. Dan is a very intelligent individual
and is presently an auditor for Control Data.
He has a very analytical mind and I personally
have a great deal of confidence in his ability.
I know that he would do extremely well and serve
the community very well as a member of the
Planning Commission.
I have asked Ron to send out the formal application
to him and hopefully we will have that by Council
Meeting on Monday night. I plan to submit his
name to the Council for approval unless, of course,
any of you have any objection. If you have any
objection, please let me know or if you have any
additional questions, please con_act me.
Sinberely,
r /Ds an Nyquist
r:
DAN /lb
cc: Jerry S 9;4 9 - FED AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE)
rt _
NOTE
Information on Suburban Sanitary Disposal Authority is for information
purposes only.
Resolution 9r will be a handout resolution.
Critical Areas Plan document will be a handout. Refer - to minutes of
Planning Commission meeting of 'December 21, 1978 for information on
public hearing on Critical Areas Plan. The Director of Planning and
Inspection will review document with you at `the Council meeting. You
will have - time -to review the > document further after he january 8, 1979
Council meeting.
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOkZYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
JANUARY 8, 1979
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in regular session and was called to order
by Mayor Dean Nyquist at 7:12 p.m.
R CALL
Mayor Dean Nyquist, C'ouncilmembers Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott. Also present was City Manager Gerald Splinter, Director of Public
Works James Merila, City Attorney Richard Schieffer, Director of Finance Paul
Holmlund, Director of Planning and Inspection Ron Warren, City Clerk Al Lindman,
and Administrative Assistant Mary Harty.
INVOCATION
The invocation was offered by Councilmember Kuefler.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 18 1978
Motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Scott to approve
the minutes of the City Council meeting of December 13, 1978 as submitted. Voting
in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott.
noting against: no c. Th-- motion passed unanimously.
OPEN FORUM
Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purposes of the Open Forum session,
Mayor Nyquist noted no one had called in prior to the City Council meeting to speak
at the Open Forum. Mayor Nyquist inquired if there was anyone present who wished
to address the Council during the Open Forum; there being none, Mayor Nyquist
proceeded with the rest of the meeting.
The City Manager stated there were two items he wished to cover which had not
been listed on the agenda He invited_ Council members to attend the dousing
Commission meeting to be held Tuesday evening, January 9, 1979. The Chairperson
of the Housing Commission had requested the City Manager invite Council members
to attend the meeting because the Housing Commission will be discussing the
housing plans for large family low income housing. The meeting begins at 7 :30 p.m.
at City Hall,
The City Manager next reviewed the Howe Fertilizer fire situation to date. He
noted some people had been overcome by carbon monoxide fumes not specifically
from the fire but from equipment that was running. The City Manager noted there
were many agencies involved in assessing the fire and the potential pollution and
health problems resulting from the fire, The City Manager explained many of the
agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency, State Agriculture, Health_
and the Pollution Control Agencies were presently working with the Howes to
1 -8 -79 -1-
assess the possible pollution problem. He noted temporary disposal sites had been
established for run -off pollution. He further noted the Agriculture Department was
trying to determine the toxicity potential resulting from the fire. The City Manager
stated there was a good listing of what was contained in.the building that burned.
The City Manager explained there was no threat to the City's water supply from
the fire. He noted there was a possible threat to shallow water wells located in
the City but that all residents with shallow water wells had been contacted:. The
building which burned was a storage shed and garage. The City Manager explained
he had received a request from the Howes to build a temporary building to replace
the building that burned. The City Manager explained there was no provision in
the State Building Code for temporary buildings other than a temporary building to
protect workers while working on another structure. The City Manager noted he
had scheduled a meeting with the Howes for Tuesday, January 9 at which time
the City administration would be able to assess the request to build a temporary
building after more information had been acquired. The key issue in approval or .
nonapproval of the request is what the purpose of the building would be and what
might be housed in the building. The City Manager further explained the investi-
gation into the cause of the fire had been initiated but the final results of the
investigation would not be completed for some time. The City Manager explained
that both the cold and the smoke made the fire fighting difficult but the wind was
favorable in terms of not having to evacuate the homes in the area.
Councilmember Fignar questioned the City Manager about police surveillance of
the area. The City Manager explained there presently was not 24 hour police
sn eiUance in the area because it was unnecessary but the police were checking
the site, frequently and had dealt with traffic control in the perimeter ai eat during
the fire fighting operation.
In response to questions from Councilmember Kuefier, the City Manager explained
Brooklyn Center had utilized services available under mutual aid and the Cities
of Robbinsdale, Crystal, Brooklyn Park and New Hope had helped to -fight the fire.
Councilmember Lhotka wished to note recognition to the Fire Department and the
Police Department for their professionalism in handling the problem.
Mayor INyquist asked about an announcement put out by the PCA indicating that
some people may be in danger as a result of the pollutants from the fire. The
City Manager explained that some inaccurate information had been disseminated
by a Howe employee. This inaccurate information may have caused that -earlier
announcement. The City Manager noted officials have stated -they are satisfied
there is no danger to people in the area from pollutant run -off.
Noting the time of 7:30, the Mayor again -asked if anyone in the audience wished
to speak at the Open Forum; there being; none, the Open Forum was closed.
ADJOURN 1978 CI TY COUNCIL
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember
Fignar to adjourn the 1978 City Council meeting. Voting in favor: Mayor
Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against:
none. The motion passed unanimously.
1 -8 -73 2
ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE
The City Clerk was present to administer the oath of office to Councilmember- elect
Bill Fignar and Councilmember - elect Tony Kuefler. The oath was administered.
L
CALL TO ORDER 1979 CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Nyquist called the 1979 City Council to order at 7 :35 p.m,
. SELECTION OF MAYOR PRO TEM
There was a motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded by Councilmember
Lhotka to appoint Councilmember Bill Fignar as the Mayor Pro Tem. ` Voting in
favors Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler; Fignar, Lhotka, and .Scott.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously, The Mayor noted the
City Charter provides that "the Council shall choose from its members _a
President Pro Tem which shall hold office at the pleasure of the Council and
shall serve as President in the Mayor's absence and as Mayor in the case of
the Mayor's disability or absence from the City. Although the Charter does
not so specifically require, it is traditional that the Council selects a Mayor
Pro Tem at its organizational meeting,
DESIGNATION OF 'OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER
There was a motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded by Councilmember
Fignar to designate the Brooklyn Center Post as the official City newspaper for
the year 1979 Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar,
Lhotka,' and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
•
DESIGNATION OF CITY WEED INSPECTOR
There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and wcccnded by Councilmember
Fignar to designate the City Clerk, Al Lindman, as the City Weed Inspector for
the year 1979. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar,
Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
BOND REDUCTIONS
The City Manager recommended the following performance bonds for reduction:
Century 21 - Lowry Realty office building located at 7000 Brooklyn Boulevard
submitted by Mr, Richard Rockstad to be reduced to $5, 000, Westbrook Mall
Shopping Center (Gabbert & Beck) located at 5717 Xerxes Avenue North submitted
by Mr, Warren Beck to be reduced to $5,000.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember
Lhotka to approve the bond reductions as recommended by the City Manager,
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and
Scott, Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously_,
REDUCE SUBDIVISION BOND
The City Manager recommended reducing the'subdivision bond for Robert Barr
Addition from $1,870 to $500. The subdivision is located at Lakeside and
Twin Lake Avenue North,
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember
Kuefler to reduce the subdivision bond for Robert Barr Addition from $1,870 to
$500. ,Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka,
1 -8 -79 -3
and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
APPOINTMENTS
The Mayor explained that the terms of several Commissioners from the City Advisory
Commissions had expired December 31, 1978. Several of those Commissioners had
expressed an interest in serving another term. Sylvia Winkelman of the Conserva-
tion Commission and Michael Schroeder of the Park and Recreation Commission
had indicated they - wished to resign from their respective Commissions. This
leaves one vacancy on the Conservation Commission and one vacancy on the
Park and Recreation Commission. As Council Liaison to the Conservation Commis-
sion, Councilmember Scott asked that the appointment to the Conservation
Commission be deferred until the next Council meeting. As Council liaison to
the Park and Recreation,. Councilmember Kuefler asked that the appointment to
the Park and Recreation Commission be deferred until the next Council meeting.
There was a motion by Councilmember Kuefler and seconded by Councilmember
Fignar to approve the following appointments to the City's Advisory Commissions:
Edith Johnson- Human Rights Commission, William Price and Bernard Wesloh-
Conservation Commission, Gerald Johnson and Vern Velasco -Park and Recreation
Commission, Dolores' Hastings, Karen Duenow, and Patricia Weitzel- Housing
Commission. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar,
Lhotka, and Scotto Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember
Ku_ -filer to prepare resolutions expressing recognition of and gratttude to those
Commissioners who had served oil the City Advisory Commissions and were . •
resigning and also to Vi Kanatz who has resigned from the Charter Commission.
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and
Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously,
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -1
Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and, moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE
TO THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES
The motion for.the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Gene Lhotka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia
Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution
was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -2
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption;
RESOLUTION- DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN
RATE AUTHORITY
on
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott;
1 -8 -79 -4-
and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was
declared duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -3
Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE CAMDEN NORThWESTERN STATE BANK A
DEPOSITORY OF CITY FUNDS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Gene Lhotka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -4
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FIDELITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY A
DEPOSITORY OF CITY FUNDS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: - none, whereupon said
• resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. o
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -5
Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolutions and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION. DESIGNATING THE FIRST BROOKDALE STATE BANK A DEPOSITORY
OF CITY FUNDS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same : - none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -6
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS A
DEPOSITORY OF CITY FUNDS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by -
member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
1 -8 -79 -5-
,
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -7
Member Tony Kuefler.introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption;
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE FIRST PLYMOUTH NATIONAL BANK A DEPOSITORY
OF CITY FUNDS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Gene Lhotka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, - Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against , the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO, 79 -8
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE HENNEPIN FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCI-
ATION A DEPOSITORY OF CITY FUNDS
The motion for the adoption of 'the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO 0 799
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: •
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE HOME FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCI-
ATTONT A DEPOSITORY OF CITY FUNDS o
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler; Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and ,
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -10
Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE MARQUETTE NATIONAL BANK A DEPOSITORY
OF CITY FUNDS •
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Gene Lhotka, and upon .vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION L TION NO. 79 -11
Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
1 -8 -79 -5-
L _
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE MIDWEST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
ASSOCIATION A DEPOSITORY OF CITY FUNDS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene. Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -12
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE TWIN CITY FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
ASSOCIATION A DEPOSITORY OF CITY FUNDS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by `
member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon
said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
In discussion of the designation of several banks as depositories of City funds,
Councilmember Fignar suggested the City might wish to consider the Summit
Bank of Richfield, Brooklyn Center branch, as a future depository of City funds
The ' Director of Finance indicated the Brooklyn Center branch of the Summit.
Bank of Richfield had not approached the City on this matter, which was the
accepted procedure
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -13
Member Celia Scott introduced.the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO FILE AN APPLICA-
TION FOR A GRANT TO ACQUIRE AND DEVELOP OPEN SPACE LAND UNDER THE
PROVISIONS Of THE FEDERAL LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT AND
THE STATE NATURAL RESOURCE FUND
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Gene Lhotka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO fl 79 -14
Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO FILE AN APPLICA-
TION FOR A GRANT TO ACQUIRE AND DEVELOP OPEN SPACE LAND UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT AND
THE STATE NATURAL RESOURCE FUND
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
1 -8 -79 -7
in favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and_the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO 79 -15
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF AN ENERGY CONSERVATION ANALYSIS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
.member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia .Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -16
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY
CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL OPERATIONAL BYLAWS -
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken _thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted againsC the same: none, whereupon said -
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 79--17
Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1979 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO PROVIDE FOR.
WAGE AND SALARY ADJUSTMENTS
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Gene Lhotka, and upon vote being taken thereon, the fallowing voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -1$
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1979 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO PROVIDE FOR
CETA EMPLOYEES EXTENSION
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
1-8-79 -8-
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -19
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
• RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1979 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO PROVIDE FOR
CETA EMPLOYEES EXTENSION IN THE DETACHED WORKER PROGRAM
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was ,duly seconded by
member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: _none, whereupon said
resolution.was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -20
Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED
PUBLIC SERVICE OF MR, JAMES BOOK
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Gene Lhotka -, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted;
RESOL't7TION NO. 79 -21
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE
DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE - `OF MRS. DEBORAH JACOBSON
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -22
Member Bill Fignar introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND APPRECIATION FOR THE
DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE OF MR. GILBERT ENGDAHL
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly _seconded by
member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -23
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
1 -8 -79 -9
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF SOILS INVESTIGATION SERVICES
FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 1978 -38 AND 1978 -44
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by •
member Celia Scott, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -24
Member Gene Lhotka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR FRONT END LOADER
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist,.Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -25
Member Celia Scott introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS TO FURNISH AND. INSTALL A
TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AT THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
CITY HALL
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member Tony Kuefler, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Dean Nyquist, Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and
Celia Scott; and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 79 -I
Member Tony Kuefler introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY ORDINANCES RELATIVE TO
THE REZONING OF THE SLAUGHTERHOUSE PROPERTY
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by
member Bill Fignar, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof: Tony Kuefler, Bill Fignar, Gene Lhotka, and Celia Scott; and the
following voted against the same: none, whereupon said ordinance was declared
duly passed and adopted.. Mayor Nyquist abstained.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
The City Manager introduced the first item of discussion, the Critical Areas Plan.
He noted the Director of Planning and Inspection was prepared to review the
Critical Areas Plan. The Director of Planning and Inspection explained the draft
of the Brooklyn Center Critical Areas Plan was a working copy document. The
document had been received earlier Monday prior to the Council meeting. Upon
1 -8 -79 _10-
review and approval of the Plan by the City Council, recommended adjustments
will be made to the document. The final document, as ap- proved, will be
distributed to the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Environmental
Quality Board for a formal review. The City must make final adoption of the
Critical Areas Plan within thirty days of final Environmental Quality Board approval.
The Director of Planning and Inspection suggested that he would briefly review
the document and the Council could study the document further prior to the
January 22 City Council meeting, at which time the City Council will be asked
to consider approval of the document.
In response to questions from the Council, the Director of Planning and Inspec-
tion explained in November, 1976, Governor Wendell Anderson had designated
the Mississippi River corridor through :the Twin Cities metropolitan area as
the second of the State's critical areas. This designation was initiated by a
citizens' league committee which had studied the river corridor. The area
to be included in this critical area was legally described.
Also in response to questions from the Council, the Director of Planning and
Inspection explained the Critical Areas designation does not necessarily place
another level of bureaucracy on the property owners in the area. The Environ-
_mental Quality Board has stated that the Critical Areas designation actually
restores more local control to the area. The Director of Planning and Inspection
noted the Consultant recommends leaving the area primarily as is.
The Director of Planning and Inspection briefly reviewed the process which had
been used to formulate the recommended Critical Areas Plan. The City Advisory
Commissions and the Neighborhoou Advisory Groups were invited to attend a
Planning Commission meeting in October in order to lay out the process for
putting together the Critical Areas Plan. The first public hearing on the Critical
Areas Plan was held on November 16 Members of the City Advisory Commissions
and the Neighborhood Advisory Groups and all other interested citizens were
invited to attend that public hearing to provide public input on the first phase
of the Critical Areas Plan, The second public hearing was held December 21
at which time the second phase of the Critical Areas Plan was discussed. Again,
the City Advisory Commissions and the Neighborhood Advisory Groups and all
other interested citizens were invited to the public hearing in order to provide
public input on the plan,
The Director of Planning and Inspection also noted that although the Critical Areas
Plan is not the vehicle for a recommendation concerning the upgrading of 169,
the Consultant did look at the question of the upgrading of 169 and has included
a recommendation for the upgrading of 169 based on projected needs. The
recommendation of the Consultant is to construct a frontage road along the
the present 169 right -of -way and construct a possible four lane at grade
roadway westerly of the present 169 right -of -way with a recommendation to
hold speeds at approximately 45 miles per hour. The Director of Planning and
Inspection noted he saw this recommendation as a viable alternative at this
time. This recommendation would mean removal of much of the west side of
West River Road. The Director of Planning and Inspection further noted the
reason the recommendation was being made at this time was because the City
of Brooklyn Center is currently involved in the Critical Areas Plan. The ,
1 -8 -79 -11-
Consultant has given a preliminary report on what might be feasible in terms of
the upgrading of 169. The process for a determination of what will be done with
169 is in the beginning stages. As the process proceeds there will be public
hearings and environmental impact statements as well as other studies.
The Director of Planning and Inspection did note that the proposed bridge over
the Mississippi River at 95th Street will increase traffic in the area of 169
north of 694 by 100 %; however, if a northtown crosstown was not constructed
there will be a dramatic increase in traffic on 169 north of 694.
The Director of Planning and Inspection then explained that the premise in
the Environmental Impact Statement for the area is that Highway 169 should not
have to carry a greater burden of traffic than the roadway on the east side of the
river. Upgrading 169 as a four lane at grade roadway would facilitate this.
Upgrading 169 as a freeway roadway would draw more traffic to the west side
roadway.
In response to questions concerning an erosion of the tax base due to using
taxable property as right -of -way for an upgraded 169, the Director of Planning
and Inspection explained questions such as these would be included in the
Environmental Impact Statement,
The Director of Planning and Inspection explained the Critical Areas Plan deals
with many other factors other than the upgrading of 169. He explained adoption
of the Critical Areas Plan is not an adoption ui the recommendation to upgrade
169. _.
The Director of Planning and Inspection briefly reviewed the actual Critical
Areas Plan document noting the Council should pay particular attention to the
goals and policy guidelines as listed in the document. The Director of Planning
and Inspection briefly reviewed the maps which had been included in the document.
He suggested the Council should review the document and discuss approval of the
document at the January 22 City Council meeting,
APPROVAL OF CONTRACT
The City Manager introduced the next discussion item, an approval of a contract
with the Suburban Community Services for the delivery of services for the
handicapped. The City Manager recommended a motion approving the contract,
Under the contract with Suburban Community Services, a part -time professional
person would be hired to coordinate the existing programs forthe handicapped
within eight suburban communities, The City Manager noted the cost to each
community for this service would be less than the amount appropriated for this
activity for 1978. There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by
Councilmember Scott to approve the contract with the Suburban Community Services
for the delivery of services for the handicapped. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist,
Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: -none. The
motion passed unanimously.
ANNUAL WATER ASSESSMENT GRADE ADJUSTMENT CORRECTION
The City Manager explained at the December 18, 1978 City Council meeting, the
Director of Public Works informed the Council of the extent of increase in water
1-8-79 _12-
assessment rates. Pursuant to Resolution No. 74 -45 the City's water assessment
policy comprehends an automatic annual adjustment by the change in the Twin
City area Consumer's Price Index from October to October of the preceding year.
The annual percentage increase from October, 1977 to October, 1978 amounts to
10.3 %, changed from a front footage rate from $14,47 to $15.95 and the area rate
from $4.46 to $4.92 per one hundred square feet, and the single family rates from
$1,418 to $1,564 per unit. The- increase was incorrectly stated in the December 18
agenda as an increase from $1 418 to $1 ,455 rather than the correct increase. from
$1,418 to $1,564. A motion approving the rate adjustment was passed at the
December 18 Council meeting. A motion approving the corrected rate adjustment is
recommended at this time. There was a motion by Councilmember Kuefler and
seconded by Councilmember Fignar to approve the corrected rate adjustment. Voting
in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotk4, and Scott.
Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
LICENSES °
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Lhotka
to approve the following list of licenses:
CIGARETTE LICENSE
B -K Vending Company 7263 Washington Ave. So.
Northern States Power 4501 68th Ave. No.
Brookdale Cinema '5801 John Martin Drive
Brooks Superette 6800 Humboldt Ave. No
Dean's Vending P. 0. Box 380
Brookdale Motel 6500 Lyndale Ave. No.
Dud nu' s vii Tire 6900 Brooklyn Blvd.
R. E. Fritz Company 8511 10th Ave. No.
Bob Ryan Olds 6700 Brooklyn Blvd.
Ideal Northbrook Drug 6800 Humboldt Ave. No.
Jerry's Super Va lu 5801 Xerxes Ave. No.
K -Mart 5930 Earle Brown Drive
Lemon Tree Restaurant 5540 Brooklyn Blvd,
Midwest Vending Company 8645 5th Ave. So.
Brookdale Chrysler Plymouth 6121 Brooklyn Blvd.
Rog & Jim's Superette 6912 Brooklyn Blvd.
Service Systems Corporation Soo Line Building
Northwestern Bell 5910 Shingle Creek Pkwy.
Servoma tion 4301 68th Ave. No
Brooklyn Center Post Office 6848 Lee Ave. No.
Dayton's Brookdale Shopping Ctr.
Donaldson's Brookdale Shopping Ctr.
Iten Chevrolet 6701 Brooklyn Blvd.
J. C Penney's Brookdale Shopping Ctr.
State Farm Insurance 5930 Shingle Creek Pkwy.
Snyder Brothers Drug Brookdale Shopping Ctr,
Twin City Vending Co. 1065 E. Hwy 36
Earle Brown Farm Ind. Park 6100 Summit Drive
Viking Pioneer Dist. Co. 5200 W. 74th St;
LaBelle's 5925 Earle Brown Dr.
1 -8 -79 -13
COMMERCIAL KENNEL LICENSE
Brooklyn Pet Hospital 4902 France Ave. No.
K -Mart 5930 Earle Brown Dr.
FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
Chuck Wagon Inn •5720 Morgan Ave. No.
Farrell's ice Cream Parlor 5524 Brooklyn Blvd.
GASOLINE SERVICE STATION LICENSE
Brooklyn Center Post Office 6848 Lee Ave. No.
Duane's OK Tire 6900 Brooklyn Blvd.
Green Meadows 3319 49th Ave. No.
Northern States Power Co. 4501 68th Ave. No.
LODGING ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
Brookdale Motel 6500 Lynda`e No.
MECHANICAL SYSTEM'S LICENSE
Cool Air Mechanical 1067 Rice Street
NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
JEM Bowl, Inc. 104 E. 60th St.
Earle Brown Bowl 6440 James Circle
OFF -SALE NONINTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
Rog & Jim's - Superette 6912 Brooklyn Blvd.
SuperAmerica Stations Inc. P. O Box 248
SuperAmerica 6545 W. River Road
Zayre Shopper's City 3600 63rd Ave. No.
PERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
JEM Bowl, Inc. 104 E. 60th St.
Earle Brown Bowl 6440 James Circle
TAXICAB LICENSE
Town Taxi Corporation 7440 Oxford Street
Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and
Scott. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously,
1 -8 -79 -14-
l
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Councilmember Scott and seconded by Councilmember Kuefler
to adjourn the City Council meeting, doting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Council-
members Kuefler, Fignar, Lhotka, and Scott. Voting against: none. The motion
passed unanimously, The Brooklyn Center City Council adjourned at 8:45 p.m.
Clerk Mayor
1 -8 -79 -15-
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
JANUARY 11, 1978
:CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Planning Commission met in regular session and was called to order by Chairman
Gilbert Engdahl at 8:04 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chairman Engdahl, Commissioners Jacobson, Book, Hawes, Theis, Malecki and Pierce.
Also present were Director of Public.Works James Merila, Director of Planning and
Inspection Ronald Warren, Planning Aide Gary Shallcross and Superintendent of
Engineering James Noska. New Planning Commission members present were George
Lucht and Nancy Manson,
APPROVE MINUTES - DECEMBER 21, 1978
Motion by Commissioner Hawes seconded by Commissioner Malecki to approve the
minutes of the December 21, 1978 meeting as submitted. Voting in favor: Chair-
man Engdahl, Commissioners Jacobson, Book, Hawes and Theis. Voting against:
none. The motion passed. Commissioner Pierce and Malecki abstained as they
were not at that meeting.
ADJOURN 1978 COMMISSION °
Motion by Commissioner Malecki seconded by Commissioner Book to adjourn the 1978
Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously. The 1978 Planning Commission
adjourned at 8:07 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER 1979 COMMISSION
Commissioner Harold Pierce, who served as Chairman Pro tem for 1978, assumed the
Chair for organizational purposes and called the 1979 Planning Commission to
order at 8:09 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chairman Pro tem Pierce, CommissionersTheis, Malecki, Hawes, Manson and Lucht.
Also present were Director of Public Works James Merila, Director of Planning
and Inspection Ronald Warren, Planning Aide Gary Shallcross and Superintendent
of Engineering James Noska. New Planning Commission members present were George
Lucht and Nancy Manson,
Election of Chairman
The first item of bus; ess was the annual election of the Planning Commission
Chairman. Chairman Pr tem Pierce called for nominations.
Motion by Commissioner Hawes seconded by Commissioner Malecki to nominate Harol.d
Pierce as Chairman of the Planning Commission.
Chairman Pro tem Pierce asked for other nominations. No other nominations were
made.
Motion by Commissioner Theis seconded by Commissioner Lucht to close the nomi-
nations. Voting in favor: Chairman Pro tem Pierce, Commissioners Theis, Malecki,
Hawes, Manson and Lucht. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously.
1 -11 -79 -1-
A vote was taken to elect Harold Pierce as Chairman. The motion passed unanimously.
Election of Chairman Pro tem
Chairman Pierce next called for nominations for Chairman Pro tem.`
Motion by Commissioner Malecki, seconded by Commissioner Lucht to nominate William
Hawes as Chairman Pro tem.
Chairman Pierce asked for other nominations. No other nominations were made.
Motion by Commissioner Manson seconded by Commissioner Malecki to close the nomi-
nations. Voting in favor: Chairman Pierce, Commissioners Hawes, Lucht, Malecki,
Manson, and.Thei . Voting against: none. The motion passed- unanimously.
APPLICATION NO. 79001 (Kenneth Bergstrom
Following the Chairman's explanation, the first item of consideration was Appli-
cation No. 79001 submitted by Kenneth Bergstrom. The Secretary introduced "the
application and explained that the applicant was seeking 'a rezoning from C2 to
_R4 of an approximate 8 acre tract located in the 1300 block south of 69th Avenue
North. He explained that the property is bounded on the west by the Humboldt
Square Shopping Center; on the north by 69th Avenue North and the City's Public
Utility Building; on the east by single family residential homes facing Emerson
Avenue-North and on the south by a number of R5 Multiple Family Residential
dwellings. The Secretary stated that the applicant had submitted a letter re-
questing the rezoning indicating that the site has remained undeveloped over the
years, because of an apparent lack of a need for additional shopping centers.
He stated the applicant intends to build quad ra homes which he claims would ful-
fill a need for additional medium - priced housing and provide an attractive buffer
between the existing single family homes and the Humboldt Square Shopping Center.
The Secretary reported that the City's Comprehensive Plan calls for a site at
the Northeast Neighborhood to be retained as Commercial for purposes of ultimate
development as a neighborhood business center. He explained that the subject
site and the present Humboldt Square Shopping' Center is the area designated for
the location of such a facility. He noted• that the"same applicant had requested
a rezoning of the subject property from C2-to, ..Ri` under Application No. 77011 in
March, 1977, and that the Planning Commission had reviewed the Comprehensive Plan
inconsistencies and recommended that the Comprehensive Plan be amended for the
following reasons
1. The Northeast Neighborhood is adequately served by shopping
facilities, both within and near the neighborhood.
2. The Comprehensive Plan designation for this area for further
development as a neighborhood shopping center has been
satisfied with the existing retail center.
3. There is substantial vacant commercial land elsewhere in the
Northeast Neighborhood.
4. The owner has initiated a rezoning of the approximate 8 acre
parcel from C2 to RI.
5. The proposed use represents a reasonable use of the land and
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan development goal
for the Northeast Neighborhood.
1 -11 -79 -2-
The Planning Commission, at that time, also recommended rezoning of the area
through Planning Commission Resolution No. 77 -3 citing that there is an additional
need for R1 zoned land in the Northeast Neighborhood; that the existing Humboldt
Square retail center adequately serves the neighborhood as a centrally located
shopping center; that there is no need for additional C2 development in the
area; and that the owner had proposed a zoning change which represents a reason-
able use classification of the property.
The Secretary explained that the City Council had been inclined to approve the
rezoning and the Comprehensive Plan amendment in 1977, but continued its con -
sideration of these matters until Mr. Bergstrom submitted a proposal which showed
.positive buffering of the property from the Humboldt Square Center. The screen-
ing plans were never submitted, and the rezoning request was withdrawn. The
Secretary further noted. the Comprehensive Plan Goal which states "made single
family detached housing the predominant character of the Northeast Neighborhood."
He explained that a March, 1976 land use inventory of the City was discussed by
the Planning Commission during its review of the applicant's 1977 rezoning request.
He stated that at that time, single family detached dwellings comprised 48.5% of
the total number of dwellings in the Northeast Neighborhood while townhouses
and multiple family apartment units comprised 51.4% of the total dwelling units.
for this neighborhood. He further stated that this land use inventory has been
updated and that the figures are now about reversed, that single family dwellings
comprise approximately 51% of the total dwelling units in the neighborhood and
multiple family residential units comprise approximately 490
,..The Secretary also reported that he had requested the applicant to submit con-
ceptual plans regarding his proposed development to better illustrate how it
would meet the R4 district requirements, but that they had not yet been received.
He stated that the Commission might want to table the application following this
evening's public hearing rather than to refer it to the Northeast Neighborhood
Advisory Group until the applicant had submitted such conceptual plans for review.
-Chairman Pierce asked what was the allowable density for R4 Zoning. The Secretary
respondeu treat the ordinance ailows a density of a units per acre after deducting
roadways and abutting setbacks and that approximately 50 units would be allowable.
Chairman Pierce then recognized Mr. Bergstrom, who at that time supplied the Com-
mission with four copies of his conceptual plans for the development. The Secretary
noted that the proposal envisioned four plexes with each building under separate
ownership and subject to a Rental Dwelling License. He went on to state that the
City's concern-is the maintenance of the common areas and the potential need for
cross easements for driveway and parking areas. Commissioner Theis then asked
for a clarification of the rent and ownership arrangement. The Secretary ex-
plained that the development would essentially be four plexes with each building
being under separate ownership probably for investment purposes. He added that
owners could reside in one of the units or rent out all four units. The Secretary
then asked for, and received, confirmation that a public street was contemplated
adjacent to the development. While considering the plans, the Secretary recalled
that the earlier proposed RI development would have had to provide screening from
the Humboldt Square Shopping Center. He stated that there are no screening re-
quirements where R4 abuts C2, but that there would be screening requirements
where the proposed R4 would abut Ri on the eastern side of the site.
PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Pierce opened the meeting for purposes of a public hearing and asked
for comments from the audience as to the proposed rezoning. He recognized George
Mayleben, 6824 Emerson Avenue North, who addressed the Commission on behalf of
the neighborhood. Mr. Mayleben argued that the neighborhood was being decimated
by multiple family development, and that there was not much available land for
single family development. He cited Metro Plan calling for a certain percent of
R1 development.
1 -11 -79 -3-
The Secretary interjected that while not familar with the Metro Council's require-
ments for Rl development, he was aware that the Metro Council was concerned with
multiple family development as well. Mr. Mayleben replied that those living in
the area of 69th and Humboldt Avenues are in an area with an abundance of multiple
family dwellings. He stated that the neighbors living around the property in
question had hoped that Mr. Bergstrom would continue with his single family de-
velopment. He.also cited growing concern in the neighborhood over declining
school enrollments and the impact that multiple family development would have on
declining entrollments.
Tim Boyle, 6813 Emerson Avenue North, stated that he was not in favor of the
present rezoning application, while he had been 100% in favor of the R1 rezoning.
Mr. Mayleben then asked whether the buffer was the reason why the Rl proposal
had been dropped before, and why the R4 development was being proposed now. The
Secretary stated that Mr. Bergstrom's 1977 R1 rezoning request had been deferred
until he provided the City with a plan for screening the single family area from
the Humboldt Square Shopping Center, and he did not know why Mr. Bergstrom with-
drew that rezoning application for Rl. Mr. Mayleben expressed his feeling that
the Northeast Neighborhood is still not predominantly single family residential
development. Mr. Mayleben stressed the fact that west of Humboldt'Avenue, there
is a high concentration of multiple family development, and that a number of
these apartments are, in fact, vacant. He also commented that he would probably
favor a C2 development over an R4 development in this area,
Chairman Pierce noted that C2 is the highest commercial zoning designation. He
stated further that he had favored an RI development when it was proposed pre-
viously, but that the present application was for an R4 zoning. Chairman Pierce
recognized the resident of 6804 Emerson Avenue North, who expressed the opinion
that there were enough apartments in the immediate vicinity and that there was
no need for more. Chairman Pierce inquired if anyone else wished to be heard.
No one spoke further relating to the application.
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
Motion by Commissioner Malecki seconded by' Comm issiorier'Hawes to close the 'Public
hearing on Application No. 79001. The motion passed unanimously.
Chairman Pierce asked Mr. Bergstrom why he did not pursue the R1 proposal. Mr.
Bergstrom stated that the developer with whom he had previously been working did
not have adequate financing. and .that he had encountered technical problems
building single family dwellings on the high water table in the area. Commis-
sioner Hawes asked Mr. Bergstrom how many single family dwellings had been con -
templated. Mr. Bergstrom replied 23. Chairman Pierce asked the Secretary what
other alternative zonings could be considered. The Secretary replied that the
land in question could be zoned R3 for townhouses, but that Mr. Bergstrom had
indicated he wanted to stay away from a development involving a Homeowners Associ- .
ation. Chairman Pierce stated that the proposed four plexes are similar to
townhouses. Commissioner Hawes asked Mr. Bergstrom if the individual dwelling
units could be `owned. Mr. Bergstrom replied that eventually they could. The
City Engineer commented that the developer was considering the - possibility of
eventually having each unit available for individual ownership, but that his
short range goal was to develop rental units. Commissioner Theis inquired as
to what other kinds of development would be allowed if the rezoning were approved.
The City Engineer responded that multi residential uses of one and one -half or
two stories in height are permitted. He cited Columbus Village as an example.
M OTION TO TABLE APPLICATION NO. 79001 (Kenneth Bergstrom
Following further discussion, there was a motion by Commissioner Theis, seconded
by Commissioner Malecki to table the application and refer it to the Northeast
Neighborhood Advisory Group Voting in favor of the motion: Commissioners
.. Malecki, Theis, Pierce, Manson and Lucht. Voting against: Commissioner Hawes.
The motion passed. Commissioner Hawes indicated that he felt more information
was needed before referring the matter.
1-11-79 -4-
A brief discussion ensued with Chairman Pierce commenting that the Commission
should not look at a rezoning strictly on the basis of the availability of
financing, rather, it was important to receive input from the neighborhood and
review the proposal in light of the Comprehensive Plan. The Secretary commented
that while neighborhood feedback was desirable and necessary, it was not the
sole determinant of whether the rezoning is appropriate, but that the Standards
for Rezoning in the Ordinance are the criteria to be used.
A discussion ensued concerning the process to amend the Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Lucht inquired whether information given to the Planning Commission
could in turn be given to the Neighborhood Groups, citing acreage figures avail-
able for multiple family and single family development. The Secretary replied
in the affirmative.
RECESS
The Planning Commission recessed at 9:04 p.m. and resumed at 9:29 p.m.
A pplication No. 79002 (Janis Blumentais /B.C.I.P.)
The next item of consideration was Application No. 79002 submitted by Janis
Blumentals for Brooklyn Center Industrial Park. The Secretary introduced the
item and stated the applicant was seeking site and building plan approval for an
approximate 85,000 sq. ft. speculative industrial building at approximately 67th
Avenue North and Shingle Creek Parkway. He stated that the building is located
on a proposed approximate 5 acre site on the northern portion of a large tract
(Tract B, R.L.S. 1405) located north of Freeway Boulevard and westerly of Shingle
Creek Parkway, just east of the MTC garage site and Shingle Creek.
The Secretary reported that the applicant has submitted a proposed conceptual
master plan for this large tract including a layout for additional speculative
industrial buildings. He stated the plan comprehends the upgrading of Shingle
Creek Parkway to a divided four lane facility similar i.n design to Shingle Creek
Parkway located south of the freeway. He pointed out that construction for the
upgraded roadway, which would allow for a continuation of Shingle Creek Parkway
through to 69th Avenue North, is proposed 1979. The Secretary further reported
that the conceptual master plan also comprehends the future construction of a
cul -de -sac to serve proposed parcels to the south. He explained that the appli-
cant was not seeking approval at this time of the master plan and that the
subdivision of the area would be accomplished through a future replatting.
The Secretary then reviewed the site and building plans and pointed out that the
plans indicate parking for 141 cars, which comprehends parking meeting the
ordinance formula for 10% of the building to be used as office space associated
With the industrial use. He added that the applicant has also presented a Proof
of Parking which could provide for an additional 90 parking spaces which would .
allow 39% of the building to be used for office space. He further stated that
the plan indicates an area south of the building that is to be used in conjunction
with a cross easement for driving and parking purposes for two additional build-
ings proposed_at a future date.
The City Engineer reviewed the conceptual master plan in more detail and com-
.mented relative to the proposed upgrading of Shingle Creek Parkway. He explained
that the site on which the applicant proposes the speculative industrial building
would have two curb cuts, but with the completion of the roadway there would be
only one median cut to serve the site. He painted out that the applicant has
been made aware of the possible need for an environmental assessment prior to
development to the south of the site and adjacent to Shingle Creek and that
various approvals or permits from State and Federal agencies will have to be
obtained. He explained that this could have an impact on the replatting of this
area for further development but does not effect the site under consideration in
this application. The City Engineer also commented on a bridge over- Shingle
Creek Parkway just west of the MTC site that would tie together existing Shingle
Creek Parkway and _explained that the bridge is currently under design.
1 -11 -79 -5
Chairman Pierce recognized the applicants, Janis Blumentals and Al Beisner repre-
senting Brooklyn Center Industrial .Park, and a lengthy discussion ensued relative
to the site and building plans and the conceptual master plan for the area. Mr.
Beisner stated that he has contacted the appropriate agencies regarding the
necessary permits for developing some of the lowlands next to Shingle Creek. He
explained that`it would be some time before he would receive the necessary permits
In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Theis, Mr. Beisner stated that con-
struction of the buildings immediately to the south of this building might be as
early as next fall.
The Secretary next reviewed the landscape plan and recommended that *it be revised
to indicate a`five foot sodded and irrigated greenstrip along the west property
line rather than the sand and gravel treatment proposed by the applicant. ; He
also recommended that the plans be revised to include 6" wood mulch in the plant-
ing areas rather than the rock over poly treatment proposed by the applicant.
The Secretary then reviewed the recommended conditions of approval.
The City Engineer commented that the Commission might also want to include :a
condition that would acknowledge that the City would retain the performance bond
to cover the installation of a normally required greenstrip buffer area along
the proposed south property line should the development of the additional
Ld p culativeindustrial buildings not be constructed to share a common parking and
iving area.
MOTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 79002 (Janis Blumentals/B.C.I.P.
Following further discussion there was a motion by Commissioner Malecki seconded
by Commissioner Theis to recommend approval of Application No. 79002 submitted by
Janis Blumentals /Brooklyn Center Industrial Park subject to the following
conditions:
1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the
Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to
the issuance of permits.
2. Grading, drainage, utility and landscaping plans are subject
to reveiw and approval by the City Engineer prior to the
issuance of permits.
3. A Performance Agreement and supporting financial guarantee
(in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be
submitted to assure completion of approved site improvements.
4. The building, shall be equipped with an automatic fire
extinguishing system to meet NFPA Standard.No. 13 and shall
be connected to an approved central monitoring system in
accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances.
5. Any outside trash disposal equipment and /or rooftop mechanical
equipment shall be appropriately screened from view.
6. All landscaped areas shall be equipped with an underground
irrigati.on "system as approved by the City Engineer.
7. The property shall be platted in accordance with 15
of the City Ordinances.
1 -11 -79 -6-
8. Performance bond comprehends retaining an amount to assure
completion of a greenstrip buffer area along the proposed
south property line if the proposed replatting which
comprehends joint use of this area with two buildings
to the south is not accomplished.
9. The plans should be modified to indicate a 5' greenstrip
along he west property line to be sodded and irrigated
9 P P Y 9
along with the proposed plantings.
10. Plans are to be modified to include 6" wood mulch in land-
scaped areas proposed for a rock and poly treatment.
The motion passed unanimously.
APPLICATION NO. 79003 (Harold J. Westin & Associates /Group Health)
The next item of consideration was Application No. 79003 submitted by Harold J.
Westin and Associates /Group Health. The Secretary introduced the item and stated
that the applicant is s s' a building an a approval for an I �
t t seeking site and pl pp approximate
7,700 sq. ft. addition to the Group Health Clinic at 6845 Lee Avenue North. He
explained that the original site and building plans were approved under Appli-
cation No. 74050 in October, 1974. The Secretary stated with the addition, the
applicant is proposing to construct an additional parking lot primarily for staff
use, to the south of the building addition. He explained that presently the
clinic has parking for 99 cars, and that with the addition, a total of 164 parking
spaces is required.`
The Secretary commented that the applicant proposes to retain as many existing
pP P ro P
trees as possible in the area of the new parking lot and has also proposed addi-
tional landscaping and berming along Noble Avenue North and the south portion of
the ro ert . He added that the plans show the continuation of existing trees
P P Y �' 9
along Noble Avenue Nort as well as new ti'ecs and plants south of the main drive
on Lee Avenue. He pointed out that the exterior treatment to the addition is a
precast concrete to match the existing structure.
The Secre tary next reviewed the recommended conditions of approval. Chairman
Pierce recognized Mr. Bob Kline, representing Harold J. Westin and Associates.
Commissioner Theis asked Mr. Kline whether Group Health was extending its
current type of treatment in its facility or whether they would be adding new
types of treatment. Mr. Kline replied that Group Health was expanding the same
type of treatment and would not be providing other types of treatment at this
location. Commissioner Lucht pointed out the box elders deteriorate quickly
and asked whether they would be removed. Mr. Kline replied that the density
proposed is such that some could be lost. The City Engineer added that box
elders provide cover until more durable trees mature. The discussion continued
on lands -aping aspects of the plan. Chairman Pierce asked whether there was a
need for 65 staff parking spaces. Mr. Kline responded that Group Health has
5 staff per doctor and with 13 to 14 doctors, the staff total would be approxi-
ma ely 65 or 70. Commissioner Hawes inquired of the Secretary whether the plan
provided adequate screening of the parking lot to the north. The Secretary
responded that the plan indicates the ordinance required screening provisions.
..Commissioner Theis asked about the type of trees proposed. The Secretary ex-
piained each type providing screening on the perimeter. Commissioner Lucht
inquired whether the removal of dead and marginal trees would be included in
the performance bond requirement. The Secretary indicated that it would.
1 -11 -79 -7-
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 79003 (Harold J. Westin and Associates/
Group Health) _
Motion by Commissioner Lucht seconded by Commissioner Malecki.to approve Appli-
cation No. 79003 submitted by Harold J. Westin and Associates /Group Health,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the
Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to
the issuance of permits.
2. Grading, drainage, utility and landscape plans are subject to
review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance
of permits.
3. A Performance Agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in
an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be sub-
mitted to assure completion of approved site improvements.
4. The building addition shall be equipped with an automatic fire
extinguishing system to meet NFPA Standard No . l 3 and shall be
connected to an approved central monitoring device in accordance
with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances.
5. Any outside trash disposal equipment and /or rooftop mechanical
equipment shall be appropriately screened from view.
6. The underground irrigation system shall be extended to all
landscaped areas as approved by the City Engineer.
The motion passed unanimously,
. DISCUSSION IJEMS
1979 Meeting Schedule
The Secretary reviewed a schedule for 1979 Planning Commission meetings. He
explained the meetings are scheduled to provide two meetings per month and are
designed to follow the City Council's schedule for convenience.
Commission Theis requested a clarification between regular and study sessions.
The Secretary explained that regular sessions are designed to handle business,
make formal decisions, and hold public hearings, while study sessions are for
review of ordinance issues, consultant presentation, and to collect feedback
from neighborhood groups.. It was consensus of the Commission to accept the 1979
meeting schedule as proposed.
COMMISSION LIAISON TO NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS
Regarding Commission liaison assignments to Neighborhood Groups, the Secretary
pointed out that Commission members serve as liaison to the different Neighbor-
hood Advisory Groups. He pointed out that with exception of the Southwest
Neighborhood which had two members and the Southeast, Neighborhood which had
none, there was one Commission member each group. Commissioner Lucht
offered to serve as liaison to the Southeast Neighborhood. Chairman Pierce made
the following Neighborhood Group assignments:
Southwest: Hawes
West Central: Malecki
Central Pierce
Northwest: Theis
Northeast: Manson
Southeast: Lucht
1 -11 -79 -8
The Secretary urged that Commission liaisons set up neighborhood group meetings
to solicit input on the Comprehensive Plan and neighborhood concerns. He added
that the City would assist wherever possible in setting up places to meet and
serving notice.
The Commission concluded its meeting with a brief discussion concerning Howe
Fertilizer, Inc. with the Secretary giving them updated information on the
status of the site following the January 6, 1979 fire.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Theis seconded by Commissioner Hawes to adjourn the meeting.
The motion passed unanimously. The Planning Commission Adjourned at 11:11 p.m.
Chairman
1 -11 -79 -9-
L`
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO TECHNICAL AND ENGINEERING
ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner
of Transportation, is authorized to provide technical and engineering
assistance to other road authorities by M.S. 161.39, and is willing
to do so;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Brooklyn Center as follows: -
1. The City of Brooklyn Center enter into a Technical and
Engineering Assistance Agreement with the State of
Minnesota, Department of Transportation.
2. The Mayor and City Manager be and they are hereby
authorized to execute such an agreement and thereby
assume for and on behalf of the City of Brooklyn
Center all of the contractual obligations therein.
•
3. The City Engineer for and on behalf of the City of
Brooklyn Center is hereby authorized to request and
obtain from the Minnesota Department of Transportation
needed engineering and technical services during the
year of 1979 and subsequent years until recinded by either
party, for which payment will be made by the City of
Brooklyn Center upon receipt of verified claims from
the Commissioner of Transportation.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member , and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO AGENCY AGREEMENT WITH THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to "Section 161.36, Subdivision l
thourgh 6, Minnesota Statutes 1978, the Commissioner of Transportation
be appointed as agent of the City of Brooklyn Center to let as its
agent, contracts for the construction of portions of Municipal Streets,
and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed
for and on behalf of the City Council to execute and enter into a
contract with the Commissioner of Transportation prescribing the terms
and conditions of such contracts in the form as set forth and contained
in 'Minnesota Department of Transportation Agency Contract Form No.
30774 a copy of which said form was before the Council, assuming
on ebhalf of the City all of the contractual obligations therein
contained.
Date Mayor
.CTES1: — - - -
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member , and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the followin g resolution C-
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK UNDER CONTRACT NO. 1977 -J
(CONTRACTED BY CITY)
WHEREAS,, pursuant to written Contract No. 1977 -J signed with
the City of Brooklyn, Center, Minnesota, C.S. McCrossan, Inc., has
satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance with
said contract:
Street Grading, Base & Surfacing Improvement Project No. 1977 -17
On proposed Unity Avenue North from 443 feet north of the
centerline of 69th Avenue North northerly approximately
460 feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Brooklyn Center:
1. The work completed for said project under said contract is
hereby accepted and approved.
2. The value of work performed is less than the original
contract amount by $2,726.09 primarily due to an overestimation of
plan quantities for riprap and common excavation.
3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said
project, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount
to be paid for said improvement project under said 'contract shall be
$39,211.91.
Date Mayor
ATTEST
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
?rlc
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption
e .,
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK UNDER CONTRACT NO. 1977 -1
(CONTRACTED BY CITY)
WHEREAS, pursuant to written Contract No. 1977 -1 signed with
the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, C.S. McCrossan, Inc., has
satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance with
said contract:
Curb & Gutter Improvement Project No. 1977 -18
On proposed Unity Avenue North from 443 feet north of the
centerline of 69th Avenue North northerly approximately
460 feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Brooklyn Center:
1. The work completed for said project under said contract is
hereby accepted and approved.
2. The value of work performed is less than the original
contract amount by $80.28 because of an overestimation of the plan
quantities for curb and gutters
3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said
project, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount
to be paid for said improvement project under said contract shall be
$4,868.04.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member , and upon vote being taken
thereon the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the followin g resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK UNDER CONTRACT NO. 1978 -I
( CONTRACTED BY CITY)
WHEREAS, pursuant to written Contract No. 1978 -I signed with
the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, United Asphalt Co., Inc.,
has satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance
with said contract:
L
Base Portion of Street Paving Improvement Project No. 1978 -2
~ On the north one -half of 70th Avenue North from Brooklyn
Boulevard to future Kyle Avenue North.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Brooklyn Center:
1. The work completed for said project under said contract is
hereby accepted and approved.
2. The value of work performed is greater than the original
contract amount by $40.10 because of an underestimation of the plan
quantities for aggregate base.
3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said
project, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount
to be paid for said improvement project under said contract shall be
$512.60.
Date Mayor
ATTESTS
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member , and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CGEPTING WORK UNDER CONTRACT NO. 1978 -I
(CONTRACTED BY CITY)
WHEREAS, pursuant to written Contract No. 1978 -I signed with
the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, United Asphalt Co., Inc.,has
satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance
with said contract:
Base Portion of Street Grading, Base & Surfacing Improvement
Project No. 1978 -20
Irving Avenue North from approximately 155 feet south of 70th
Avenue North to proposed Irving Lane; and proposed Irving Lane
from approximately 738 feet east of Logan Avenue North to
Irving Avenue North.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City,
of Brooklyn Center
1. The work completed for said project under said contract is
hereby accepted and approved.
2. The value of work performed is greater than the original
contract amount by $285,83 because of an underestimation of the plan
quantities for aggregate base.
3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said
project, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount
to be paid for said improvement project under said contract shall be
$1,230.83.
Date Mayon
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member . , and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.`
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK UNDER CONTRACT NO. 1978 -I
(CONTRACTED BY CITY)
WHEREAS, pursuant to written Contract No. 1978 -1 signed with
the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, United Asphalt Co,, Inc., has
satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance with
said contract-
Base Portion of Street Grading, Base & Surfacing Improvement
Project No. 1978 -24
Aldrich Avenue North from 68th Avenue North northerly
approximately 340 feet to cul -de -sac.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Brooklyn Center:
1.- The work completed for said project under said contract is
hereby accepted and approved.
2. The value of work performed is greater than the original
contract amount by $208.06 because of an underestimation of the plan
quantities for aggregate base.
3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said
project, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount
to be paid for said improvement project under said contract shall be
$1,153.06.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same.
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
Member introduced the following resolution 'ell
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK UNDER CONTRACT NO. 1978 -I
(CONTRACTED BY CITY)
WHEREAS, pursuant to written Contract No. 1978 -I signed with
the City of'Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, United Asphalt Co., Inc., has
satisfactorily completed the following improvement in accordance with
said contract:
Base Portion of Street Grading, Base & Surfacing Improvement
Project No. 1978 -27
On proposed James Circle from Freeway Boulevard southerly
approximately 570 feet to cul -de -sac.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Brooklyn Center:
I. The work completed for said project under said contract is
hereby accepted and approved.
2. The value of work performed is greater than the original
• contract amount by $761.51 because of an underestimation of the plan
quantities for aggregate base,
3. It is hereby directed that final payment be made on said
project, taking the Contractor's receipt in full. The total amount
to be paid for said improvement project under said contract shall be
$3,596.51
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member , and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said - resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLU'T'ION NO.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING STORM SE WER I MPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 1979 -2 AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
WHEREAS, on September 11, 1978, the Brooklyn Center City
Council adopted Resolution No. 78 -196 establishing Street Grading,
Base & Surfacing Improvement Project No. 1978 -38 and Curb & Gutter
& Sidewalk Improvement Project No. 1978 -39 and ordered preparation
of'plans and specifications for the reconstruction of 53rd Avenue
North from Penn Avenue North to 4th Street North; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it necessary, in conjunction
with said 53rd Avenue reconstruction, to initiate Storm Sewer
Improvement Project No. 1979 -2;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Brooklyn Center to direct the City Engineer to prepare plans
and specifications for said improvement project described as follows:
1979 -2 - Storm Sewer
• Modification of existing storm sewer along 53rd Avenue
North from Penn Avenue North to 4th Street North; and
installation of new storm sewer along Oliver Avenue North
from 53rd Avenue North northward approximately 300 feet
and along Dupont Avenue North from 53rd Avenue North
northward approximately 200 feet.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member , and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member
introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHIN WATER IMPROVEMENT G T MAIN I O NT PROJECT
NO. 1979 -1 AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS
WHEREAS, on September 11, 1978, the Brooklyn Center City Council
adopted Resolution No. 78 -196 establishing Street Grading, Base &
Surfaging Improvement Project No. 1978 -38 and Curb & Gutter & Sidewalk
Improvement Project No. 1978 -39 and ordered preparation of plans and
specifications for the reconstruction of 53rd Avenue North from Penn
Avenue North to 4th Street North; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it necessary, in conjunction with
said 53rd Avenue reconstruction, to initiate Water Main Improvement
Project No. 1979-1;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Brooklyn Center to direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and
specifications for said improvement project described as follows:
1979 -1 - Water Main
Along 53rd Avenue North from Bryant Avenue North to 4th
Street North.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the followin g resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF 2, 000
FEET OF 2 -1/2" FIRE HOSE AND 2,000 FEET OF 1 -1/2"
FIRE HOSE
WHEREAS, Chapter 471.345 of the Minnesota Statutes provides for
t the purchase of merchandise, materials or equipment, or any kind of construc-
tion work by informal quotations when the amount of such contract is less than
ten thousand dollars ($10, 000); and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has obtained quotations on the purchase
of 4,000 feet of fire hose and has determined that the quotation of Coyer and
Associates in the amount of $180 /foot for 1 -1/2" and $270 /foot for 2 -1/2"
fire hose for a total amount of $9, 000 is the best quotation submitted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Brooklyn Center that the City Manager is authorized to contract for the
purchase of 4,000 feet of fire hose in the amount of $9,000 from Coyer_ and
Associates.
Date Mayor
ATTEST
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Fire Hose Quotations
Akins Fire Equipment
2,000 ft. 1-1/2" Hose @ $1 .98 /foot $3,960
2,000 ft. 2 -1/2" Hose @ $2.84 /foot 5,680
$9,640
Coyer and Associates
2,000 ft. 1 -1/2" Hose @ $1.80 /foot $3,600
2,000 ft. 2 -1/2" Hose @ $2.70 /foot 5,400
$9,000
FOB - Brooklyn Center
y
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND
APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE
OF MR. MICHAEL SCHROEDER
WHEREAS, Mr. Michael Schroeder served as a member of the Park
and Recreation Commission from September, 1976 through January, 1979; and
WHEREAS, his devotion to the tasks and responsibilities of this
Commission contributed substantially to the sound progress and development
of the City; and
WHEREAS, his public service and civic effort for the betterment of
the community merit the gratitude of the citizens of Brooklyn Center,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Brooklyn Center that:
The dedicated public service of Mr. Michael
Schroeder as a member of the Park and Recreation
Commission and citizen, is recognized and appreciated
by the City of Brooklyn Center.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption: of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption;
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND
APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE
OF MRS. SYLVIA WINKELMAN
WHEREAS, Mrs. Sylvia Winkelman served as a member of the
Conservation Commission from January, 1970 through December, 1978; and
WHEREAS, her devotion to the tasks and responsibilities of this
Commission contributed substantially to the sound progress and development
of the City; and
WHEREAS, her public service and civic effort for the betterment of
the community merit the gratitude of the citizens of Brooklyn Center.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Brooklyn Center that:
I`
i
The dedicated public service of Mrs. Sylvia
Winkelman as a member of the Conservation Com-
mission and citizen, is recognized and appreciated
by the City of Br ,,nly.� „ C-; enter.
Date Mayor
.ATTEST:
Clerk.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING RECOGNITION OF AND
APPRECIATION FOR THE DEDICATED PUBLIC SERVICE
OF MRS. VIOLA KANATZ
WHEREAS, Mrs. Viola Kanatz served as a member of the Charter
Commission from April, 1972 through December, 1976 and as that body's
chairman from January, 1977 through November, 1978; and
WHEREAS, her devotion to the tasks and responsibilities of this
Commission and the leadership she provided contributed substantially to
the sound progress and development of the City; and
WHEREAS, her public service and civic effort for the betterment
of the community merit the gratitude of the citizens of Brooklyn Center.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Brooklyn Center that:
The dedicated public service of Mrs. Viola Kanatz
as a member and Chairman of the Charter Commission and
citizen, is recognized and appreciated by the City of
Brooklyn Center.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RENEWING INSURANCE CONTRACT
WHEREAS, on December 4, 1978, the City Council accepted the
proposal of the Home Insurance Company and renewed its insurance
contract for liquor liability insurance coverage for the calendar year
1979; and
WHEREAS, the Home Insurance Company will only insure liquor
liability to $300,000 and that the statutory limit for liquor liability is
$500,000; and
WHEREAS, the Belefonte Underwriters, through the Towle Agency,
has submitted a proposal to renew its excess liquor liability insurance
contract for the calendar year 1979:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Brooklyn Center to accept the proposal of the Belefonte Under-
writers and the Towle Agency and renew its insurance contract for the
period commencing January 1, 1979 for one year as follows:
• Excess liquor liability insurance with a limit of liability
of $200,000 per location annual aggregate, in excess of
$300,000 per location annual aggregate for an annual
premium, subject to audit adjustment, of $3,284.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by member , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF ONE
COMPACT PICKUP TRUCK
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is authorized to participate
in the Hennepin County Purchasing Agreement; and
WHEREAS, on Tuesday, November 21, 1978 at 2:00 p.m. bids
were received for the furnishing and delivery of light and heavy duty trucks.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the bid of Downtown
Chevrolet for one Chevrolet Luv Compact Pickup Truck in the amount of
$4,317.37 in accordance with specifications is deemed to be the best bid
submitted by responsible bidders and said bid is hereby accepted.
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
♦ . `` /[
I
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM; Brad Hoffman, Administrative Assistant
DATE: January 18, 1979
SUBJECT: Proposed Special HRA Legislation
Over the past few months, the Brooklyn Center Housing Commission has been
Involved in an active discussion of potential housing programs to be implemented
in the City using both Community Development funds and HRA monies. The Com-
mission recommended to the Community Development Citizens Participation Com -
mittee that monies from the Community Development grant be set aside for housing
rehabilitation grants and in turn the recommended such a program to the
Council
The authority of the City to develop and operate its own rehab grant and /or loan
program is somewhat clouded. Generally, the statutory authority for a City to be
involved in housing orientated programs and the extent of such involvement is
defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462 and Chapter 472A.
The citiefi, through HRA's, are empowered to carry out three general types of housing
activities under existing state statutes. First, the City has the authority to acquire,
relocate, construct and manage public housing projects in conjunction with the
Federal Public Housing Program. Public housing projects are generally a thing of
the, ;past with current emphasis being placed upon single family, scattered site
public housing. Second, the City has certain "housing development project" powers
which are quite broad. ° This empowers the City to acquire, relocate and clear sites
for so called "moderate income housing projects ". In the past, such powers have
been used by HRA's to construct, own and operate middle income housing projects.
Third,
Chapter 462 authorizes certain HRA activities in conjunction with redevel-
opment projects The HRA would be authorized to designate a project area that is
blighted and deteriorated and create a plan for the development of that project area
Once created, the HRA is authorized to acquire, relocate, clear and convey or lease
the land to private developers, with or without a "write- down" for the purpose con-
sistent with the plan including commerical and industrial uses.
Specialized powers have been added to the state statutes which relate to the three
general categories as described. For example, the state statutes permit "spot
renewal" . This authorizes the HRA to carry on redevelopment project activities on
a lot by lot basis without the necessity of creating an area wide redevelopment
plan. The City is also empowered to manage rental projects which grew out of the
Federal Public Housing Program and has been construed to permit HRA's to manage
nonowned middle income projects. Finally, there is a broad grant of power which
Gerald G. Splinter -2- January 18, 1979
authorizes HRA's to "cooperate with or act as an agent for" the federal government,
the state or any municipality or agency or instrumentality thereof in carrying out
any federal, -state or local legislation related to the provisions of Chapter 462.
Accordingly, an HRA can act as an agent for carrying out Community Development
Block Grant programs so long as they relate to housing and redevelopment activities..
Absent special legislation which some communities have obtained, the powers of
an HRA or a City to carry out housing rehabilitation programs are somewhat limited.
First, the HRA can rehabilitate property which it owns whether it intends to retain
ownership or intends to sell or lease the property after rehabilitation. Secondly,
In its capacity as an agent, an HRA can administer the federal 312 rehabilitation
loan grant program. Finally, the state statute authorizes locally funded rehabilita-
tion loan and grant programs, but only to the extent that they are consistent with
the terms and conditions of the federal 312 program. Many communities carry out
Community Development Housing and Redevelopment Programs based solely on
federal eligibility criteria without seeking legislative authority. It is the view of
some authorities that communities are not specifically authorized to develop and
operate their own rehabilitation grant programs using either HRA funds or Community
Development Block Grant funds.
Attached is a copy of proposed special legislation authorizing the City of Brooklyn
Center to develop and administer its own housing rehabilitation loan and grant pro-
gram with respect to any property found or located within the City's boundaries.
The bill has been developed to give the City the greatest latitude in the development
of its own program to meet the housing needs in Brooklyn Center. The proposed
bill, if adopted, would alleviate any clouds or ambiguities presently associated
with any rehab grant program using either Community Development monies or HRA
monies.
It would be my recommendation that the City seek passage of this bill in the State
Legislature.
1 A BILL FOR AN ACT
2 relating to the city of Brooklyn Center;.
3 authorizing housing and rehabilitation
4 loan and grant program;
5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
6 Section 1. [PURPOSE.] The legislature of the state
7 of Minnesota finds that preservation of the quality of life
8 in a metropolitan city.is dependent upon the preservation
9 of adequate housing, that many houses in the city of Brooklyn
10 Center do not meet the app licable housing code, that there
'11 is a need for a housing rehabilitation program in the city
12 of Brooklyn Center which will complement any statewide housing
13 rehabilitation program, that some home owners are unable
14` to afford any rehabilitation expenses, that many home owners
15 are unable to afford housing rehabilitation loans at market
16 rate of interest, and that because the availability of mort
-� 17 gage credit for housing rehabilitation is limited some home
18 owners cannot obtain such credit.
19_ Seca 2. [CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER; HOUSING REHABILITATION
20 LOAN AND GRANT PROGRAM.] The city of Brooklyn Center is
21 authorized to develop and administer a housing rehabilitation
22 loan and grant program with respect to property located
23 anywhere within its boundaries which is owned by persons
24 of low and moderate income on-such terms and conditions
' 25 as it determines.
26 Sec. 3. [REGULATIONS.] The City Council shall, by
27 ordinance, promulgate regulations for this program. Loans
28 or grants shall not be made when the City determines that
29 financing is otherwise available from private lenders upon
30 terms and conditions which are affordable by the applicant,
31 as provided by the city in its regulations.
32 Sec. 4. [ADMINISTRATION.] The rehabilitation loan
33 and grant program established by the City Council pursuant -
34 to Section 3 be administered by the City, or may by
1 ordinance of the City Council, be administered by an existing
2 city agency or an agency created by such ordinance._
3 Sec. S. [FUNDING.] The City of Brooklyn Center, or
4 any agency designated to administer the program pursuant
5 to Section 4, may finance such program with any available
6, funds, provided, however, that The City of Brooklyn Center
7 shall not be authorized hereby to issue its general obliga-
6 tion bonds for the purposes of this Act.
9 Sec. 6. [EFFECTIVE DATE.] This act shall take effect
10 wh6h approved by a majority of the City Council of Brooklyn
11 Center and upon compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section
' I
'12
645.021.
` f
MEMORANDUM
TO: Council Members
Charter Commission Members
FROM: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
DATE: January 17, 1979
SUBJECT: Proposed Charter Amendments
Chairman Kanatz presented the proposed Charter amendments to the City Council
on October 16, 1978. The Council discussed the proposed Charter amendments
- at the October 30, 1978 City Council meeting and at that time, as part of the
official record, the Council listed those proposed amendments which were accep-
table and objectionable and the reasons for acceptance or objection.
Since that time, Chairman Kanatz has resigned. Commissioners Hintzman and
Asplund met with Mary Harty and myself on December 13 to clear up certain ques-
tions concerning Council comments on specific proposed amendments. All of the
amendments were reviewed at that meeting. Attached is a summation of the under-
standing reached at that meeting. This memorandum is being provided to both the
Council and the Charter Commission in order to ascertain whether there is an
understanding of Council point of view and Charter point of view as it relates to
disagreement and agreement in the proposed amendments. It is honed this will
expedite the continuation of this process.
If either side has been misrepresented, please contact me.
Amendment 1 Motion defeated by the Charter Commission.
Amendment 2 Charter Commission has agreed to study it further. Substantive
disagreement over whether the terms of Councilmembers and the
Mayor should be limited.
Amendment 3 Charter Commission concurs with the Council suggestion that
the wording should be changed. It is a question of draftsman -
ship not a substantive difference. Suggested wording "No member
of the Council shall be appointed City Manager, nor shall any
member hold any paid municipal office or employment for the
City, nor shall any former member be appointed to any full time
paid appointive office or employment for the City, until one year
after the expiration of his term or his resignation from the office
of Mayor or Councilman.
Amendment 4 Charter Commission has agreed to study udy it further. Substantive
disagreement over the number which should constitute a quorum.
t
Council Members
Charter Commission Members -2- January 17, 1979
Amendment 5 Charter Commission concurs with the Council suggestion to
change the wording to Minnesota Open Meeting Law rather
than the State Open Meeting Law.
Amendment 6 The Charter Commission has agreed to study it further. Sub-
stantive disagreement over whether the Council "shall" compel
the attendance of absent members or whether the Council "may"
compel the attendance.
Amendment 7 Accepted
Amendment 8 Accepted
Amendment 9 Charter Commission concurs with a Council suggestion to change
the wording to "within 30 days after its final passage" rather than
Y A g
- "within 30 days of its final passage Still at issue is a ques-
tion of what constitutes publish. Since it has been published in
full text once after its first reading, would it be adequate to pub -
dish the title of the ordinance and a short summation of the ordinance
if the titre was not self explanatory. Added to that, notice could
be a mention that the full text of the ordinance is available from
the City Clerks office. Under this arrangement, the full text of
• the ordinance would be published after the first reading. The
title, possibly a short summation, and notice, of where to acquire
full text of ordinance would be published "within 30 days after its
final passage ". This suggestion is made due to the cost of pub-
lishing an ordinance in full two times. The cost of publishing
lengthy ordinances in full can approach $100.
Amendment 10 Accepted
Amendment 11 Charter Commission has agreed to, study it further. Substantive
disagreement over the number of nominees for an election.
Amendment 12 Accepted
Amendment 13 Charter Commission has agreed to study it further. Question as
to what constitutes "the people ".
Amendment 14 Motion defeated by the Charter Commission.
- Amendment 15 Charter Commission has agreed to study it further. Question as
to whether City could spend any money, even for informational
items, under the suggested wording.
Amendment 16 Accepted
Council Members
Charter Commission Members -3- January 17, 1979
Amendment 17 Charter Commission would like to see suggested wording
maintained City Attorney will comment.
Amendment 18 Charter Commission accepts the Council suggestion to retain
the paragraph.
Amendment 19 Charter Commission has agreed to study it further. The intent
of the Charter Commission, to remove the dollar amounts from
the Charter, can be met by the following wording suggested by
City staff.
Section 6.05. PURCHASE AND CONTRACTS. The City
Council shall, by resolution, establish and maintain a purchasing
policy for the City of Brooklyn Center. All contracts, bonds, and
instruments of any kind to which the City is a party shall be signed
by the Mayor and the City Manager on behalf of the City and shall
be executed in the name of the City.
If the recommended wording is acceptable, a City Purchasing
Policy could be passed by resolution. -A draft copy is attached.
Amendment 20 Charter Commission has agreed to study it further. The intent of
' the Charter Commission, to remove the dollar amount from the
Charter, can be met by the following wording suggested by City
staff .
Section 6.06. CONTRACTS: HOW LET. Every contract for
the purchase of supplies, materials, equipment or the rental
thereof, or the construction, alteration, repair or maintenance
of real or personal property shall be in accordance with the Uniform
Municipal Contracting Law, M.S.A. Section 471.345. Subject to
the provisions of this charter, the, Council may by resolution adopt
further regulations for the making of bids and the letting of contracts.
If the recommended wording is acceptable, a City Purchasing Policy
could be passed by resolution. A draft copy is attached.
Amendment 21 Charter Commission states their research indicates according to
Attorney General's opinion Section 7.16 is meaningless. City
Attorney will comment.
Amendment 22 Not applicable
Amendment 23 Accepted
Amendment 24 Accepted City Attorney will be asked to correct gender in Charter.
"DRAFT COPY"
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A CITY PURCHASING POLICY
t
WHEREAS, Section 6.05 of the City Charter of the City of Brooklyn
t f�
Center does direct the City Council to establish and maintain a purchasing
policy for the City of Brooklyn Center.
BE IT, THEREFORE, RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that the purchasing policy of the City of Brooklyn Center
.shall be as follows: .
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
PURCHASING POLICY
PURPOSE: s
It shall be the purpose of the Purchasing Policy of the City of
Brooklyn Center to:
- (I) Assure that all purchases are made in accordance with
the laws of the State of Minnesota and the policies of
the City of Brooklyn Center.
(2) Assure that all purchases are charged to the proper
account.
!41 fissure vend that the purchase iS auth^r zed and r
that their invoices will be paid promptly,
(4) Assure uniform purchasing procedures wiihin the
City's departments.
(5) Assure the City Council and the City Manager that
adequate controls over the purchasing function are
well established.and are adhered to.
DEFINITIONS:
For the purposes of establishing purchasing procedures for the
City of Brooklyn Center, the following definitions shall apply:
Contract for Services A "contract for services" means an
agreement entered into by the City for the use of professional
services such as consultants, auditors, legal counsel and
architects. "Contract for services" shall also include an
agreement entered into by the City'for insurance coverages.
I
Contract for Purchases: A "contract for purchases" means
an agreement entered into by the City for the purchase_ of
supplies, materials, equipment or the rental thereof, or the
construction, alteration, repair or maintenance of real or
personal property.
"DRAFT UUYY"
RESOLUTION NO.
PROCEDURES:
For the purpose of establishing purchasing procedures, "contracts
for services" and "contracts for purchases" shall be divided into separate
purchasing categories according to the real or estimated cost of the services
or purchases. The purchasing categories shall be: 4
Category I: $10,000 or more
Category II: $5,000 or more, but less than $10,000
Category III: $2,000 or more, but less than $5,000
Category IV : Less than $2,000
Contract for services procedures by category shall be as follows:
Category I, Category II, Category III: ($2,000 or more)
Contract awarded by.the City Council upon recommendation
of the City Manager.
Category IV : (Less than $2,000)
Contract awarded by City Manager.
Contract for purchases procedures by category shall be as follows:
Category I: ($10,000 or more)
a. Awarded by City Council upon recommendation of
City Manager.
b. rontract awarded by City Council upon receipt of
sealed bids in accordance with the Uniform Municipal
Contracting Law, M.S.A. Section 471.345.
Category II: ($5,000 through $9,999)
a. Awarded by City Council upon recommendation of
City Manager.
b. Contract awarded by City Council in accordance with
the Uniform Municipal Contracting'Law, M.S.A.
Section 471.345 upon either:
(1) receipt of sealed bids.
(2) receipt of two or more written quotations when
possible.
Category III: ($2,000 through $4,999)
a. Awarded by City Manager,
b. Contract awarded by City Manager upon receipt of
two or more written quotations.
Category IV: (Less than $2,000)
a. Awarded by City Manager.
b. Contract awarded by City Manager upon receipt of
two or more written or oral quotations when possible.
"DRAFT COPY"
RESOLUTION NO.
t GENERAL POLICIES:
I The City Manager shall establish written detailed purchasing
procedures which are. necessary to supplement the City
Council's purchasing policy and which are necessary to
maintain adequate controls over the purchasing-function.
2. Checks shall be issued regularly on the second and fourth
Mondays of each month to pay the City's outstanding
warrants, or whenever else -necessary to guarantee cash
discounts, or whenever else deemed necessary by.the
City Manager.
3. The City Manager shall keep on file for public inspection,
through the Department of Finance, a listing of all cash
disbursements made by the City during the current calendar
year,
d
x
6
{
1
I
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
p Y g
FROM: Mary Harty, Administrative Assistant
DATE: January 17, 1979
SUBJECT: Council Information on Standardized Pay Schedule for
Part -Time Clerical Employees_
The following summation briefly outlines the reasons for a recommended standard -
ized pay schedule for part -time clerical employees for informational purposes for
the City Council.
Although the setting of a standardized pay schedule for part -time employees does
require a uire Council approval, q pp al, if the pay schedule is implemented in 1979 there is
a possibility the Council may have to approve a transfer of funds at a later date
due to the schedule. -The departments affected would be able to implement the
part -time pay schedule within their allocated 1979 budgets with the exception of
the Park and Recreation Department. The maximum amount the Park and Recreation
Department would need is $8,000. It is possible the Park and Recreation Depart-
ment would be able to cover the added $8,000 labor cost through savings in other
• areas of the budget. Whether or not the Park and Recreation Department would be
able to cover the $8,000, a t this point is a matter of conjecture.
In November, 1977, a concern was raised by several department heads relative to
part -time clerical salaries. A meeting was held and a consensus was reached that
a standardized pay schedule for part -time clerical employees should be investigated.
A standardized schedule was favored for the following reasons:
1. Review of the job descriptions of the part -time clerical employees
in various departments showed the positions to be similar in scope,
function, skill level required and level of responsibility.
2. A standardized pay scale would ensure consistency and therefore
assist in more equitable personnel administration.
3. A standardized pay schedule would assist in attracting part -time
clerical employees for positions within the City.
An investigation of various alternative pay schedules was explored. Initially, calls
were made to other suburban municipalities'to ascertain their pay plan for part -time
clerical employees. The situation in a majority of municipalities contacted was
similar to the situation as it presently exists in Brooklyn Center, pay plans for part-
time clerical are not standardized. Most municipalities reported that they hired
Gerald G. Splinter -2- January 17, 1979
. part -time clerical at whatever rates the market would bear and raised individual
salaries for the same reasons. It appears that those municipa litie s. contacted,
which utilized part -time clerical, paid them a higher starting salary than was
being paid by the City of Brooklyn Center. The starting salary in Brooklyn Center
ranged from $2.50 in the Park and Recreation department to $3,00 in City Hall,
whereas most other_ municipalities started their part -time clerical at approximately
$3.25.
Regardless of the fact that most other municipalities were operating "by the seat
of their pants" in the area of pay plans for part -time clerical, it was decided a
standardized pay plan would be beneficial to Brooklyn Center. Due to increased
work load in many City departments, the City is now employing more part -time
clerical. The City currently employs (or a vacancy exists) part -time clerical
employees equal to slightly over 10% of the City's full time complement of employ -
ees. What could be dealt with less systematically in the past, presently can be
more effectively dealt with in a systematic manner due to an increase in the total
number of part -time employees.
Several pay schedules have been investigated and the cost of each determined.
An attempt was made to accommodate the following concerns in a plan:
1. Cost not prohibitive.
• 2. Ability to attract employees at the starting wage.
3. Provide incentive to part -time clerical employees to remain with the
City for an extended period of time.
4. Hourly wage for part -time clerical employees would not surpass the
rate for full -time clerical although this phenomenon is somewhat
offset by the fringe benefits available to full -time employees.
5. Step increases for part -time clerical would occur at approximately
the same intervals as for full -time clerical.
6. Pay scale would encompass the salary paid to one part -time employee
(higher than other part -time employees) without unduly skewing the
scale upward
7. Cost of living increases could be added to scale after 1979.
8. Percentage increases at each interval are reasonable.
The following pay schedule is recommended for part -time clerical employees:
Start $3.25
6 Mo. $3.40
18 Mo. $3.75
2 Yrs. $4_00
MH:ln
NORTHERN
CABLEVISION, INC.
January 10, 1979
Mr. Gerald Splinter, City Manager
City of Brooklyn Center -
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430
Dear Mr. Splinter:
In November, 1978, Northern Cablevision, Inc., a wholly -owned subsidiary of Storer
Broadcasting Company, filed with the State of Minnesota a proposal for approval of
a Cable Service Territory consisting of the municipalities of Richfield, Bloomington,
Edina, St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. That proposal is now
being reviewed by the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Cable Communications
• Beard and will be on the Board agenda at its February meeting.
On January 5, 1979, Northern Cablevision of Minneapolis, Inc., another wholly - owned
subsidiary of Storer Broadcasting Company, proposed a Cable Service Territory con-
sisting of the corporate limits of the City of Minneapolis. That proposal is also
subject to Metropolitan Council review and will be before the MCCB at its April meeting.
Representatives of Northern Cablevision have visited each of the nine northwest suburban
municipalities listed below to discuss with you the possibility of forming a similar
Cable Service Territory to that being proposed in the southwest and in the city of
Minneapolis. We have also appeared at several joint meetings of the Northwest Cable
Study Commission. Since we have found the communities and your representatives on the
Northwest Study Commission to be generally receptive to also being included in a Cable
Service Territory, I wish to confirm the intention of Northern Cablevision, inc. to
file with the State of Minnesota a proposal asking for approval of a CST consisting of
the municipalities of Golden Valley, Robbinsdale, Crystal, New Hope, Brooklyn Center,
Brooklyn Park, Osseo, Plymouth and Medicine Lake. It is our intention to file such a
request with the MCCB prior to the end of this month. After the filing of our petition,
there will be a ninety day period in which each of the affected municipalities and
the Metropolitan Council can comment upon the proposal. Each of your communities will
have an opportunity to take a position with respect to this Cable Service Territory
both during that period and at the MCCB meeting at which it is considered.
Q
1650 Northwestern Financial Center • 7900 Xerxes .Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 + 612- 835 -7784
NORTHERN
CABLEVISION, INC.
Mr. Gerald Splinter
t
January 10, 1978
Page Two
If you or any of your council members wish to have a representative of Northern Cable -
vision appear at your City Council meeting to explain this proposal, we would be more
than happy to make provision to do so. Since we wish to propose a Cable Service Terri_
tory which has the support of all included communities, we would very much appreciate
your advising us if you do not wish to be included in the Cable Service Territory which
we will be filing with the MCCB. Please advise us if you have any questions or comments,
or wish to be excluded from the CST application. You may either call or write to me
at this address or contact our Legal Counsel, Mr. James Erickson or Ms. Ember Reichgott
at Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Suite 1500, Minnea-
polis, Minnesota 55431, 835 -3800.
Thank you very much for your consideration. We look forward to being able to present
you with a proposal to bring cable television service to your city.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey A.`Maicus
NORTHERN CABLEVISION, INC.
lc/507
cc; Mr. Dean Nyquist,
NW Study Commission Member
W. D. Donaldson, MCCB
1650 Northwestern Financial Center • 7900 Xerxes Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 • 612- 835 -7784
MEMO
TO: Gerald Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Al Lindman, City Clerk
i
SUBJECT: MAPSI Contract
DATE: January 19, 1979
I
I have reviewed - the proposed contract with Municipal and Private Service,
Inc. (MAPSI) and I recommend signing -the proposed contract.
The 1979 contract comprehends an increase of 50� per hour for patrol time
and an increase of 20� per hour for - the boarding of animals impounded by
the direction of - the City. These increases were expected and money for
the increases has been incorporated into the 1979 Budget.
The balance of - the contract is the same as 1978 and is acceptable.
II
cOIViMUNITY HEALTH DEPARTMENT %E "
4th f=loor, McGill Building
509 Park Avenue ;�hNES
I HENNEPIN Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
January 12, 1979
Mr. Gerald G. Splinter
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Dear Mr. Splinter:
Enclosed please find the proposed agreement between your municipality
and the County for the use of Community Health Services Subsidy funds
to support your municipality's environmental health activities. The
funds this year have been distributed to nine municipalities on the basis
of the proportion that each municipality's environmental health expendi-
ture bea to the
expenditures of all nine. The total environmental
health
funds allocated are $32,217.
The enclosed agreement is ess`ntially the same as in 1977 and 1976 with
one important exception, this year a municipality must submit an invoice
detailing revenues and expenditures for environmental health services
rior to receiving cash payments for environmental health services.
This policy has been implemented as a result of the Minnesota Department
of Health's development of a fiscal management report placing audit
responsibility for CHS funds with Hennepin County. s
Would you please review, sign, notarize and return all three copies of
the agreement by January 22, 1979. If you have any questions regarding
the agreement please contact me.
Yours very truly,
"`�`�^'►`h 1`1-1 �—�{,
John Wm. Urbach
Environmental Health Specialist
kmd
Enclosure
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunity employer
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerald G. Splinter, City Manager
FROM: Ronald A. Warren, Director of Planning and Inspection._,�C .w
DATE: January 19, 1979
SUBJECT: Rental Dwelling Licensing for the Four Plex at 5328 - 4th Street North
On November 20, 1978, the City Council took action to deny the Rental Dwelling
License for the property at 5328 - 4th Street North owned by Mr. Robert Bobleter
because a number of housing maintenance related items had not been corrected.
You will recall that a number of violations were reported to the City Council
regarding such things as a deteriorated driveway, broken screens and storms,
paint peeling from soffit and fascia boards, and improperly supported hot water
heater flue, as well as a lack of outside lawn maintenance. The owner of the
property had indicated to the Building Inspector that the Minnesota Department
of Transportation was in the process of acquiring this property for freeway
purposes, and that he had indicated that this property acquisition would be
completed by April, 1979, and had inquired if it would be possible to get a
temporary Rental License through that time without making all of the required
maintenance improvements. We had indicated to Mr. Bobleter that such a recom-
mendation could be made to the City Council provided maintenance items related
to occupancy through the winter months such as the repair of storm windows,
storm doors and the hot water heater flue were accomplished. The Building
9
Inspector had made an inspection of this property on November 16, 1978,and none
of these items had been addressed and, therefore, a recommendation to deny the
• license had been made.
Attached is a copy of a January 12, 1979 memo from the Building Inspector re-
lating to his inspection of the property. He indicates that the corrections
we had requested that were related to a winter occupancy have been made. We
have also received a verification from MN /DOT of their intention to acquire
this property during the spring of 1979.
Because the necessary corrections have been made, it is our recommendation that
a Rental Dwelling License be authorized on a temporary basis through April, 1979
to Mr. Robert Bobleter for the four plex at 53.28 - 4th Street North.
DATE: January 12 1979
MEMO TO: Ron Warren 1
FROM: Andrew J. Alberti
RE: 5328 4th Street North
Robert Boble tte r
On 8/23/78 a relicense inspection on this four plex was
made.
On 9/8/78 a compliance order was issued with (15) housing t
i
code violations with a correction date set for 10/6/78.
On 11/16/78 an inspection was made to verify corrections.
Only one correction was made at this time. I called Mr.
Bobletter regarding this and he explained to me that he
had been negotiating with the Highway Department in a sale
of this property. I informed him that certain items must
j be corrected immediately as the cold weather was setting in.
On 12/19/78 another inspection i p ction was made and th,items relating
to cold weather have been corrected. -
In my conversation with two (2) tenants I found that tbpy
had sufficient heat and no water leak problems from torn #
roofing and broken gutters.
I'm sure we can license this dwelling for a limited time
only as I have told the owner that he will have o provide
t i
p
screens for the windows, if he is still the owner in May..
Attached are copies of the Compliance Order and a letter
from the Highway Department.
• CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 •
. Department of Planning and Inspection
(612) 561 -5440
r
• HOUSING MAINTENANCE COMPLIANCE ORDER
) A T E 9 -8 -78 COMPLIANCE DATE: 10 -6 -78
Robert E. Bobieter
kfl. 4533 Colorado Ave. N.
Minneapolis, MN 55422
5328 4th Street North.
.00ATION:.
Andrew J. Albert( _
"OV- PLIANCE OFFICIAL: - .
rte following violations of the (lousing Maintenance and Occupancy Ordinance were cited during
scent inspection of the above premises. You are hereby informed that th violations must
ae corrected on or before the COMPLIAKE DATE indicated. The premises grill be reinspected.
ailure to correct or to make satisfactory arrangements to correct violations may result in
suspension or revocation of a rental dwelling license, if applicable; and, in any case, may
result in issuance of a citation which, upon - conviction, is by fine and/or
imprisonment.
sect, on 12 -1102 of the ordiance provides for Right of Appeal, when it is a11vvvU' L14aL a
: nce Order is based upcn erroneous dnterpretat:on of this ordinance. The appeal mu :t
suer fitted to the Inspection Department, in writing, specifying the grounds for appeal,
trithin five (5) business days after service of the order, and Must be accompanied'by.a
filing fee of $15.00 in cash or cashier's check.
DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATIC'NS , ORDINANCE SECTION
FIRST NOTICE
1) Driveway on west side has large holes and is deteriorated. 12 -316 'fG
2) North rear grass area is high and uncut. 12 -317•
3) North rear storm door has a broken screen. 12 -703 &A,_'
4) northwest lower apartment has broken screen. 12 -703
4 AL
5 Mnrtheast lower apartment has broken screen. 12 -703 /' C!
• ,,6) north soffit and facia boards have peeled paint. 12 -702
7) South entrance gutter has pulled away from facia board. 12 -709 Wz___
L) South roof has broken and missing tabs. 12 -702
9) South soffit and facia board has peeled paint. 12 -702
10). Laundry room fire door does not clost tight. 12 - 703 AA �'i�,
11) South storm door has broken screen. 12 -703 NL- 1L
12) West stairway is - #+ooc# with debris. 12 - 303 f G 61& We .
13) Hot water heater/flue' is not properly supported. 12 -7 9
14) Northeast upper apartment screen is broken. 12 -703
15) East side soffit and facia .boards have peeled paint. 12 - 702%��
E$0
�N l1N Tq _
6 2 Minnesota
° Department of Transportation
o Transportation Building
F Q St. Paul Minnesota 55155
OF TRP��
phone 6121296- 3221
flow =tuber' 21 1978 r.. ,;,: ��.. • -
Mr. Peter M. Boole
City Assessor
C.ty of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway _
Txooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 '
In :reply refer to: 360
.'..Y� 2781 (9392) 921
Heinepin County
t E. Bo
bleter
Rober Parc 275. o
Dear Yr. Poole,
information is in response to our telephone This inform hone call of November 20, 1978
. p y P
regarding the status of the parcel identified above.
�
We nave *.Wade a direct purchase offer on fl7i c parcel and are now in the process
of commencing an eminent domain proceedings.
P^ expect that the petition will be filed about January 15 1979, and that
the hearing on petition will be held in the first half of April 1979. Based
on these two dates we should have title and possession of the property by
June l 1979.
If you should have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel
free to contact this office.
since'rely,
R. H. S livan, P.E.
Director
Right of Way Operations Section
.. _ s�°•!., .if ... s.. ,: .waaE:%.i�: _ ' -t: K' - _ :! :' }' • . — h : . +• � .��:
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Licenses to be approved b the City Co 1 o
pP Y y C nci n January 22, 1979
CATERING FOOD VEHICLE LICENSE
Brooklyn Center Community Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy. F.
Sanitarian
CIGARETTE LICENSE )
Brookdale Ford Inc. 2500 County Road .4• I�./IZ
n y 10
Duke's Standard Station 6501 Humboldt Ave. No. <cL2_J
Duke's Standard Station 6600 Lyndale Ave. No
The Pipeseller 1301 Brookdale Center
Servomation 4301 68th Ave. No.
Earle Brown Office Bldg. 6040 Earle Brown Dr.
City Clerk
COMMERICAL KENNEL LICENSE
F.W. Woolworth Company 1212 Brookdale Center 1� Q 1tii
Sanitarian
FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
Alano Society 4938 Brooklyn Blvd. T w ,
Baskin Robbins Brookdale Shopping C tr . 7-
Berean Evangelical Free Church 6625 Humboldt Ave. No.
Bridgeman Creameries 8151 Normandale Blvd.
Bridgeman's 1272 Brookdale Center
Brookdale Assembly of God Church 6030 Xerxes Ave. No.
Brookdale Christian Center 6120 Xerxes Ave. No.
Brooklyn Center Baptist Church 5840 Humboldt Ave. No. _f ,, VZLA_c -
Brooklyn Center Community Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy. % - , , Vj� �_
Brooklyn Center Evangelical
Free Church 6830 Quail Ave. No.
'
Brooklyn Center High School 6500 Humboldt Ave. No.
Brooklyn Center National
Little League 2006 Brookview Drive 7
Cross of Glory Church 5940 Ewing Ave. No.
JEM Bowl, Inc. 104 E. 60th St.
Earle Brown Bowl 6440 James Circle 2C.IL
j Earle Brown Elementary School 5900 Humboldt Ave.
j
Garden City School 3501 65th Ave. No.
Lynbrook Bowl 6357 North Lilac Drive
Nino's Steak Round -Up 6040 Earle Brown Dr. _
Northbrook Alliance Church 6240 Aldrich Ave. No.
Northport Elementary School 5421 Brooklyn Blvd. f� Ian Q riJ1
L.G., Inc. 1700 W. Highway 36
Orange Julius of Brookdale 1396 Brookdale Center
Orchard Lane School 6201 Noble Ave. No.
J.C. Penney Co 1265 Brookdale Center
Perkins Cake & Steak, Inc. 4917 Eden Ave.
Perkins Cake & Steak 5915 John Martin Dr. 7- `
Madeline Roche 816 69th Ave. No.
CEAP 5607 Brooklyn Blvd, T i
F.W. Woolworth, Inc. 1212 Brookdale Ctr.
Sanitarian
GASOLINE SERVICE STATION LICENSE -
Brookdale Shell Service 1505 69th Ave. No.
Duke's Standard Service 6501 Humboldt Ave. No. l7td,1CJ
Duke's Standard Service 6600 Lyndale Ave. No.
SuperAmerica Service Stations P. O. Box 248
Su erAmeri a
c p
P 6545 W. River Road .d.
City Clerk
NONPERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
Howard Bauermeister 5809 Boone Ave. No.
Pizza Factory 6816 Humboldt Ave. Na. 7 ,_(1
Bill's Juice Vending 3900 Beard Ave. So.
Holiday Inn 1501 Freeway Blvd. 7
Bond Tool and Die Co. 6840 Shingle Creek Pkwy.
Brookdale Covenant Church 5139 Brooklyn Blvd. 7 :
Brooklyn Center High School 6500 Humboldt Ave. No. i
Carousel Coiffures 6225 Brooklyn Blvd. 77 le
-
Cass Screw Company 4748 France Ave. No. -
Cats Pump Corporation 1600 Freeway Blvd.
Cook Paint 4800 North Lilac Drive
Dale Tile Company 4825 France Ave. No.
Davies Water "Equipment 4010 Lakebreeze Ave. No. — —
Dean's Vending Co. P. 0. Box 380
Brookdale Motel 6500 Lyndale Ave. No. Z
Duke's Standard Service 6501 Humboldt Ave. No. __,-
Duke's Standard Service 6600 Lyndale Ave. No. 77
Lance, Inc. 4917 tibbott Ave. No.
Brookdale'Car Wash 5500 Brooklyn Blvd. ?tJ
Pilgrim Cleaners 5748 Morgan Ave. No.
Lynbrook Bowl 6357 North Lilac Drive T -t1Z`a
Malmborg's , Inca 5120 North Lilac Drive
Midwest Screw Products 3410 48th Ave. No.
Mikros Engineering 3715 50th Ave. No. /
Precision, Inc. 3415 48th Ave. No.
Ralph's Super Service 6601 Lyndale Ave. No. tiJ
Saber Dental Studio 6800 Shingle Creek, Pkwy.
Venus Distributing 7035 Washington Ave. So.
Venus Water Beds Westbrook Mall �;tC
Sanitarian �J
OFF -SALE NONINTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
7- Eleven 411 66th Ave. No.
City Clerk
PERISHABLE VENDING MACHINE LICENSE
Duke's Standard Service 6501 Humboldt Ave. No. 7
Duke's Standard Service 6600 Lyndale Ave. No. - 7 - -
Sanitarian
REA DILY PERISHABLE FOOD VEHICLE LICENSE
Little Friends Day Care Center 5840 Humboldt Ave. No
--Sanitarian
RENTAL DWELLING LICENSE
Renewal: ��/
Dwight Jereczek 6319 Brooklyn Drive d - NdQw n _
Robert Bobletter 5328 4th Street North
Transfer:
Stanley Gibbs & R.W. Irwin 6715,17,19,21 Humboldt ,P .�/1 = /
Director of Planning
and Inspection
SPECIAL FOOD HANDLING ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE
Brooklyn Center Liquor Store #1 6800 Humboldt Ave. No.
Brooklyn Center Liquor Store #2 6250 Brooklyn Blvd. P _
Brooklyn- Center Liquor Store #3 Northbrook Shopping Ctr. 1
Fun Services Inc. 3701 50th Ave. No. T A
Sanitarian.