Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-02 PCR Member Gravdon Boeck introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -0 2 RESOLUTION REGARDING RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF APPLICATION NO. 2000 -011 SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA). WHEREAS, Application No. 2000 -011 submitted by the City of Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority (EDA) proposes rezoning from R -5 (Multiple Family Residence) to C -1 (Service /Office) of the property addressed 6421 Brooklyn Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on May 25, 2000, when a staff report and testimony regarding the rezoning request were taken; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the rezoning request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35 -208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, and in light of the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Brooklyn Center Planning Advisory Commission to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2000 -011 submitted by the City of Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority be approved in consideration of the following: 1. The rezoning will allow for the appropriate expansion, renovation and redevelopment of the Brookpark Dental Center which is considered to be a benefit to the public. 2. The rezoning proposal is believed to be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area which generally calls for service /office land uses in this particular area of Brooklyn Boulevard. 3. The proposed C -1 zoning of the property is consistent and compatible with surrounding land use classifications. 4. All permitted uses in the proposed C -1 zone may be contemplated for development or redevelopment of the subject property. 5. The subject property will bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the C -1 zoning district. 6. The subject property is considered to be unsuited for uses permitted under its present zoning classification. 7. It is believed that the proposal is consistent with the guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35 -208 of the Zoning Ordinance, is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and good planning principles and is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. s— cz�) Date Chair AT ST: 1� Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Sean Rahn and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Tim Willson_ Stephen Erdmann Sean Rahn Dianne Reem Graydon Boeck John Whitehead and the following voted against the same: None Rex Newman abstained whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.