Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 01-12 PCP PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER JANUARY 12, 2012 REGULAR SESSION 1. Call to Order: 7:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call 2011 Planning Commission 3. Approval of Minutes — December 15, 2011 4. Adjourn 2011 Planning Commission 5. Administer Oath of Office: Carlos Morgan and Michael Parks 6. Call to Order: 2012 Planning Commission 7. Roll Call 2012 Planning Commission 8. Election of 2012 Chair 9. Election of 2012 Chair Pro Tern 10. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 11. Public Hearing Items — ( items for this agenda) 12. Discussion Items A) Update and clarification by Planning Staff of Paul Hyde's request to redevelop the former Northwest Athletic /Lifetime Fitness site, 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue N. — the reconsideration under new public hearing of the land use amendment (scheduled for the January 26, 2012 Planning Commission meeting). B) Consideration of the 2012 Community Development Activities Map C) Update of the City's Landscape Points System/Tree Preservation policies 13. Other Business 14. Adjournment MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION DECEMBER 15, 2011 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Sean Rahn at 7:03 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Rahn, Commissioners Kara Kuykendall, Rachel Morey, Carlos Morgan, Michael Parks, and Stephen Schonning were present. Also present were Councilmember Carol Kleven, Secretary to the Planning Commission Tim Benetti, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Stan Leino was absent. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —November 17, 2011 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to approve the minutes of the November 17, 2011 meeting as submitted. The motion passed. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Rahn explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. Commissioner Morgan arrived at 7:10 p.m. APPLICATION NO 2011 -021 — PAUL HYDE (REAL ESTATE RECYCLING) Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2011 -021 a request for Rezoning approval the property located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North, from C -2 (Commerce) to I -1 (Industrial Park), along with a proposed land use amendment to the City's 2010 Comprehensive Land Use Plan to change the current land use designation on the subject site from "Office /Service Business" to "Industrial ". Mr. Benetti presented the staff report describing the location of the property and the proposal. He explained that to enable the rezoning, the City must amend the current land use designation for the site which is identified in the City's 2010 Comprehensive Plan as Office /Service Business to a new designation of Industrial. He added that the land use amendment and rezoning approval will facilitate redevelopment of the site. Mr. Benetti further explained that the applicant plans to acquire and develop the 7.4 acre site as well as the MnDOT owned 1.27 acre parcel which would create an approximately 8.67 acre parcel for redevelopment. He added that Real Estate Recycling's plan is to construct a new 124,000 sq. ft. office /industrial /warehouse facility and the site and building plan and replatting of the two parcels will be considered at a future Planning Commission meeting. 12 -15 -11 Page 1 Mr. Benetti explained that this rezoning application requires an additional layer of review and consideration by the Met Council to be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan. If approved, Staff will submit a land use amendment application to the Met Council to determine if the change is consistent with Met Council's land use planning. Mr. Benetti commented on the 60 day rule, noting the that the Metropolitan Council's review of this Land Use Plan amendment will necessitate the applicant to provide a waiver to this statutory time requirement and that the applicant is aware that the subsequent consideration of this rezoning application will include a replat of the properties and site & building plan reviews. Mr. Benetti recommended the Planning Commission only take action on the land use amendment and table any final consideration of the rezoning until a future meeting date, pending re after the City Council and Met Council have completed their own reviews and considerations once the land use amendment has been approved. Commissioner Parks asked about spot zoning and what the original zoning of the property was. Mr. Benetti and Mr. Eitel explained that the current land use plan reflects the previous use of the property by the NW Racquet Club, the Highway 100 access changes, and the existing industrial development land use to the north and on the east side of Highway 100. The current C -2 Commercial zoning for this site is because of the former Health Club use which occupied the site. Such a commercial use today is preferred to be in the Central Commerce /Opportunity Site area. PUBLIC HEARING — APPLICATION NO. 2011-021 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2011 -021, at 7:20 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. The applicant, Paul Hyde for Real Estate Recycling, introduced himself to the Commission. Chair Rahn asked Mr. Hyde how he expects the soil remediation to take place. Mr. Hyde responded that his company has done more superfund sites than anybody in the US and he has done many in Brooklyn Center. He explained that this property is downstream from a drainage area on the Joslyn site where they found some impacts similar to what was on the Joslyn site. He added that they have applied for a grant from DEED and hope to use that money to help clean up the site. Following that, they will begin redeveloping the site. Chair Rahn asked how long it will take? Mr. Hyde responded that his hope is that it will be speedy since they have anxious tenants ready to occupy the proposed new buildings by the fourth quarter next year. He further explained that would mean remediation would need to be done by next spring and he feels that is very achievable. The grant money will help define further what is underground so the remediation process can begin and they can begin construction soon after that. 12 -15 -11 Page 2 Chair Rahn asked the applicant to address the surrounding R -1 zoned properties. Mr. Hyde explained that they would provide a buffer similar to that around their other building that houses Caribou and Toro. He added that there is the benefit of 6 ft. to 10 ft. grade difference between the street level and the building and hope to keep the existing trees on the site. Commissioner Morgan asked the amount of the grant that was applied for. Mr. Hyde responded that the city's EDA has applied for a $50,000 grant through Met Council or DEED. This grant will allow them to determine the scope of the work through a Phase II investigation and analysis. He added that they will rip through the site with a backhoe to see where the contamination stops and they will then apply for additional grant money for cleanup on the site. Commissioner Parks asked why this use would be more successful with the new zoning designation. Mr. Hyde replied that the zoning is more stringent by not allowing outside storage. He added that the property was marketed as commercial and he has proven that the industrial zoning is desirable and successful in Brooklyn Center. Mr. Hyde further stated that the neighbors are happy with the proposed development rather than the empty lot. Commissioner Schonning commented on the difference in elevation of the single family homes and the site, noting that the difference in elevation and landscaping along Azelia does buffer the site from the residential area.. Paul Kiecker, 4701 Azelia Avenue N, stated that he bought his house two years ago. He added that he doesn't see how a warehouse benefits his property value and he feels that the neighbors are not happy about turning the cul -de -sac into a truck entrance. He is concerned about the property turning into industrial not knowing what will be there in two or five years from now. He further stated that he feels the residential area will be heavily impacted and he would like to see contracts that the product will be completed and some guarantees that the building will be occupied and not stand vacant like others in the city. Mr. Kiecker also stated that he was told by staff that his properties and the others along Azelia Avenue would be changed to an Industrial use. Commissioner Kuykendall encouraged Mr. Kiecker to attend the future meetings where this will be discussed further. Mr. Eitel stated that he does not see an expansion of the industrial zoning or uses moving across Azelia Avenue where the homes exist. What may occur is the buy -out of those 5 -6 home sites and redevelopment into a higher density residential such as townhomes; however, the City or developer does not have any plans developed at this time. Mr. Hyde stated that he understands Mr. Kiecker's concerns and they are valid. He added that they will not secure loans for construction without tenants secured. He further stated that the truck traffic on the site will be modest compared to the Caribou site and they are directing all passenger vehicles (personal and/or visitors) to the main entrance off Lakebreeze Avenue. No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on Application No. 2011 -021. 12 -15 -11 Page 3 CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall seconded by Commissioner Morey, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2011 -021, at 7:46 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND TABLING OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2011 -021 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Morey, to table Planning Commission Application No. 2011 -021. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Kuykendall, Morey, Morgan, Parks, and Schonning. And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. ACTION TO RECOMMEND AMENDING THE CITY'S 2010 -2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES FROM OS (OFFICE /SERVICE BUSINESS) TO I INDUSTRIAL) There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to recommend amending the City's 2010 -2030 Comprehensive Plan. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Kuykendall, Morey, Morgan, Parks, and Schonning. And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY — CENTRAL PORTION City staff provided an update to the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study. Mr. Eitel indicated that staff met with SRF Consulting to review the status of the study and potential development/land use issues within the central area of the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor. Mr. Eitel further described activity taking place along Brooklyn Boulevard regarding the city's acquisition of residential properties that will help with the visioning of the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor. He also pointed out that Evans Nordby Funeral Home made some positive changes to their site including the closing of the entrance closest to the intersection of 60 Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard. Mr. Eitel shared with the Commission slides of the following development activities taking place: 12 -15 -11 Page 4 FBI building Luther Honda and Toyota new car dealership NW Family Service Center addition Shingle Creek Crossing and Walmart OTHER BUSINESS: REVIEW OF THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE POLICY AND CHAPTER 20 (TREE ORDINANCE) Mr. Eitel reviewed the history with the Commission, which began with an initial Planning Commission review followed by a 6 -month experimental period during which this landscape point system was used to evaluate landscape plans and planting requirements for commercial and industrial uses. This system was approved under Planning Commission Resolution No. 86 -4. Mr. Eitel indicated that there is no record that the City Council formally accepted this Policy; however, the standard has been used to review landscape plans for the last 25 years. Chair Rahn stated that he feels we could improve the city's landscape point system since many developers seem to get by on the lower end of the planting requirements. Mr. Eitel stated that if the Commission wishes to study the landscape point system further, he would direct staff to study what other cities require, identify potential issues associated with landscaping and tree preservation ordinances, and bring it back to the Commission for more discussion. Commissioner Parks stated that he feels that we should review the landscape policy so developers cannot take down mature trees on a lot that is being developed and replace them with smaller immature trees. It was the general consensus of the Commission to direct staff to further study the city's landscape policy. Commissioner Morgan left the meeting at 9:04 p.m. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Morey, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:08 p.m. Chair Recorded and transcribed by: Rebecca Crass Recording Secretary 12 -15 -11 Page 5 City of Business and Development Department Brooklyn Center www.cityojbrooklyncenter.org 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199 Phone 763.569.3300 YFYNoice 711 Fax 763.569.3494 MEMORANDUM TO: Chair Sean Rahn and Planning Commissioners FROM: Gary Eitel, Business & Development Director` Tim Benetti, Planning & Zoning Specialist DATE: January 6, 2012 RE: Agenda Item No. 12.A — Update and clarification by Planning Staff of Paul Hyde's request to redevelop the former Northwest Athletic /Lifetime Fitness site, 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue N. — (reconsideration under new public hearing of the land use amendment) At the December 15, 2011 Planning Commission meeting, Staff presented under public hearing an item by Mr. Paul Hyde to rezone the property located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue, from C -2 (Commerce) to 1 -1 (Industrial Park). This rezoning was accompanied by an additional request to amend the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan in changing the underlying land use of the subject property from its current "OS- Office Service /Business" to an "I- Industrial" land use category. This amendment would make the proposed rezoning compliant with the City's adopted Comp Plan. Staff recommended the Commission open the public hearing; consider any public comments; discuss the rezoning and land use change; and table the rezoning. Staff then recommended the Commission forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council on the land use amendment only. Upon Council action, it was anticipated authorization would be given by the Council to submit an application to the Met Council for formal review and consideration of this land use amendment, which is required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. After this December 15 meeting and prior to submittal of this recommendation to the City Council at its January 9, 2012 meeting, it was determined Planning Staff did not adequately address or present any real findings which supported this amendment; therefore, staff agreed to withdraw this item and present it back to the Commission for reconsideration. This land use amendment is scheduled to be reconsidered under a separate public hearing at the January 26, 2012 meeting. A planning report with full analysis will be prepared and presented at this meeting. Legal notices have been published and notices have been mailed to the surrounding property owners. Staff does not intend to present any analysis or findings at this January 12 meeting; moreover, we are simply informing the Commission of our intent and reasons why this item is being reconsidered. No official action should be taken. If you have any questions, feel free to call Gary at 569 -3305 or Tim at 569 -3319 (email GEitelkci.brooklyn- center.mn.us or TBenettikci brooklyn- center.mn.us). CURRENT Z ......................... . ......... . .. .. • .... AVE :: ....: .....:: R R4 R4 C1 .... ........... ... ........... ........... - J.'2 12-- :: ::: :: •. :: .... :::�:::: _ . \ . P1 :' ' • 12 a i r . ............. .. .....•.. .•... •.. ....... ........ ..... ............ - � > 48 ...... �........... Q .::: .........: .......::: R4_ R4 7C�"r rti'.., Ji ................ .....:: r ` — R4 — R4 W 12 :.: R4 fir-- 3.. ......... . r _. R R4 7� —R4J —R4- -' ` .: .::::I:• _.. W _.. ._ .. ..... .:: > .::C :..... .: L RE AVE .. .., gat t .... . ........ 12 12* ... LAIfE . .............. . 02 RS RS RS RS RS 3i GpfZ p U 46 1/2 AVE N Q LL 46TH AVE N ❖ I -2 zone contains existing office/ warehouse developments; ❖ R-4 consists of a number of 4 -plex apartment buildings interspersed with single - family homes. ❖ R -2 consists of a number of single - family homes; two- family (duplexes); ❖ R -5 zone contains the Twin Lake Apartment complex. CURRENT LAND USE Upper Twin take 53rd A 52nd Avc z 51st Avt,, d� l ip Ro ul -Q, 50th Avr4 17tt Av 4! Middle Twin La �F Ryan Lake Office /Service Business OS - Retail Business RB Industrial I 4t Metropolitan Council " Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form Please complete the following information. When completing this form electronically, fields in grey need your input. Use the Tab key to quickly navigate to each field. Question 37 on the last page of this form is for MUSA Expansions or Changes only and does not contain grey fields, but is directly editable. The form for Question 37 is also available in Excel format. http:/Iwww This form is available in electronic format on the Metropolitan Council's website: http:/ /www metrocouncii.org/ planning /assistance /resources.htm AMENDMENT NAME i COMMUNITY PROFILE OVERVIEW y Local governmental unit: Contact name: _........._..... ._. ........................._..... .................................................................................................................................................................... Contact title: Address: ..... ...... .......... . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................... . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ............ _ . . . . . . . ........................ . . . . . . .................... . ... . . . . . . . . . . . .................... . .. . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................... City, State, Zip: Telephone number: FAX number: Email address: _....................__.........._........_..._............... ..................._........... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Date of preparation: W ❑ 2a. Land use change: .......... ... ...... ..... ................................................._ ................................ ... ......................... ......... ..... .... ................... ........ ......... ..................... ......................... ...................... ....... ......................... ............................ ................................. ........._ ... __._ ....... _ ........ ...................... ❑ 2b. MUSA expansion or change: ❑ 2c. Text Change: ❑ 2d. Other: Location: Brief description: . .... ...................................... .......... .......................... ................. .... .................................. ........... ... ...................... ..... .... ........................ .... ........... ........... ..... ........................ ..... .................. ............. ..... .... ...... ........................ .................. _ ............ __................................................ Affected area, in acres: Number of housing units in CPA area, if any: ......... ....... ... ........... .........................._.... ................ ....... ...._... _. May 2011 1 4� Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form SECTION 1: PROCESS OVERVIEW http://w/vw.metrocouncil.orqtplannin LPH L�PHSect�ldf K . Action Date of Action ❑ Acted upon by the planning commission. ❑ Approved by governing body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review n " d ❑ The Council's review(s) did not identify any issues or conditions. ❑ The Council's review(s) identified the following issues /conditions: Issue /Condition Steps taken or future planned actions, including date ............ . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................_... ..._.._..._...._._............. il a � ❑ No, none required. ❑ Yes. Indicate the type of review and approximate date of completion. If completed, include a summary of the findings below: May 2011 2 it Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form SECTION 2: FORECASTS htt[)://www.metrocouncil.orci/pIannin.q/��LPH/ -PR$ect2.�df ❑ No, no change in community -level forecasts. This plan amendment enables development that is already assumed in current, approved forecasts. ❑ Yes. Identify the net changes to community -level forecasts in the table below: I ` N Changes trr Community le�rel:,Fo s %addtf �c ti��i€� %thiemed�e . 2010'' 2020 2030'! Population I ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... _ ............................................................................. _ .......... _ . _ . Households Employment +Iteri.0 Land Use _ •Ite6#11 Housing «Item #1 Cr�trcal area ; CNR,, •itom #13 Trrp ,e mra' Ji •'item 22kWastdwater Flow `' •Item 2 Water S u ppjy�,� . . SECTI • • • • • f . • r r •• ❑ No wetlands on the site. ❑ No, no impacts to wetlands located on the site. ❑ Yes. Describe the type of wetland(s), potential impacts, and mitigation plans below: ❑ Not applicable. No land use changes proposed. r Lar Uffiele5�a ort fail lr1 All I»and Uses 1�A Area " t2esldential land UseE�nly �s ACAS r< 1...1^.�I14.)� ' i the Gommnty's pecifi land o R taps e +~ t� I"l s e_� Pre i Pos> -CPA, Pre -CPA Po��ttCPA _ i .................... ......................................... .............................................. .................................................................... ............................................. ............... .................................. i... ........................................................................................... ...................................... ....................... _ ............................... ...................................................................... _ .... -- -- -..... j ............ . ......................................._..................... _ .............................. ........_.__ .............. ............. _ ................................................. .......... ...... .... ..... ....... _ ... ........................................... ....... ... ._... i ... .................... .............................................................................................. ....................... _ .................................................. ..... .._.... ...... .. ...... .................................. __ ....................__...__..._ T Totals CPA = Comprehensive Plan Amendment May 2011 3 4� Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form ` re city�cle fo each land se ii w e �c t+cry >farf _ a�'ef i h� �' ! 9 „'. �..v A 3N. s ',.r. i� : Pre Y - „.P s ..l:: �Il in X111 land use cat+�oriies Developed Developable Amendment Developable that 11 w:m "ulti f nr>I.ly' r Total Acres Acres Acres *' Acres ** Acres residers #dal d ':vela „l�nent' B a - s = c C+ Q= E * Developable means land planned for urban residential development, infill, or redevelopment for the 2011 -2020 timeframe. ** Amendment acres from the municipality's response to Question #10 above. ; i y ❑ No. Not a community with CA / MNRRA boundaries or project site is not within CA / MNRRA boundaries. ❑ Yes. Describe below how Critical Area guidelines and MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan policies are being addressed with this amendment. SECTION 4: TRANSPORTATION b_ttp�flAwy�_.mqtrocouncil.o.-rg/p-la-np-,D-gLL�P—H/-LR-H-$-ec—t4.-Pd—f i 1 rip Generatilon "for the Sit' Trip G erat�c�n or t, to � -� Iced L rtd se � d �...w. — rLa A r ells G , I�gSt Afnerftt�ep Estimated average daily traffic Esti peak hou traffic .: ❑ No, existing local and regional road networks can accommodate increase. ❑ Yes, improvements are needed. Describe improvements and who will pay for them below: May 2011 4 4� Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form x ❑ Not applicable. No direct access to a Principal or "A" Minor Arterial. ❑ No. Explain: ❑ Yes. Describe below: a� ❑ Yes. ❑ No. If Yes, explain below: ❑ No, not currently served by transit or will not affect transit. ❑ Yes. List existing routes, describe changes, and identify proposed /necessary transit facility improvements (e.g. shelters, park & rides, etc) below: ❑ Yes. ❑ No. If No, explain why not. If Yes, describe below (e.g. car and van pooling, flexible work hours, mixed land uses that discourage vehicle trips and promote walking, biking, ridesharing, and transit): ❑ Yes. ❑ No. If No, explain why not. If yes, describe access /facilities below: May 2011 5 44� Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form r ❑ Not applicable. Site is not within airport compatibility area or search area. ❑ No. The site is within airport compatibility area or search area, but no impacts. Explain below: ❑ Yes. The CPA site is within an airport compatibility area or search area, and experiences off - airport impacts related to the following: ❑ Aircraft Noise. Describe whether the community has adopted land use compatibility guidelines, including preventive and corrective noise abatement and /or mitigation measures being applied. ❑ Airport Safety Zoning. Indicate whether the community participates on a joint airport /community zoning board, has an approved airport zoning ordinance, and how those requirements relate to the proposal. ❑ Airport Infrastructure. Describe how the proposal affects or is affected by the provision of services or facilities to the airport (e.g. roads, utilities, police /fire, etc.). SECTION 5: WATER RESOURCES h 1 FRI'l r WE ❑ Individual Sewage Treatment System (ISTS) ❑ Privately Owned / Community Treatment System ❑ Local / Municipal Owned Wastewater Treatment Plant ❑ Regional Wastewater Treatment st�atlr �.� €rp�t the 1 77-77 �777 iiirti Y0 muniky ll:t�'otal. iott \ ,.... clmrt, mt .. ,..` g , f !?!i►t Arn +d 2010 2020 2030 mgd = million gallons per day May 2011 6 44� Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form ❑ Yes. ❑ No. Explain response below: r . ❑ Yes. ❑ No. Explain response below: x /�%�`„ ❑ Yes. ❑ No. If Yes, describe steps taken to address the I/I issue and plans for action below: ON -�/FG, -a_"z .,y, 9i���� � ,�..,,,,. ,.�. ��� ._- �gi��a.,al ,?u�:. . _.. ... P ❑ Yes. Enclose a copy of the inter - community agreement with the amendment submittal. ❑ No. ❑ No. Check one of the following and describe: ❑ Runoff will not receive treatment. Describe below: ❑ Runoff will be treated off -site. Identify off -site treatment facility below: ❑ Yes. Describe type and level of on -site pollutant removal treatment /mitigation plans below: I i May 2011 7 4t Metropolitan Council "7� Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form ❑ Yes. Year adopted: ❑ No. Explain below: i r ❑ Yes. Year adopted: ❑ No. Explain below: ❑ Yes. Year adopted: ❑ No. ..................................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . ❑ Yes. Provide the water supply plan amendment as an attachment to describe necessary facilities improvements or changes. ❑ No increase or decrease in projected water use from the water supply plan. SECTION 6: PARKS http://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/LPH/LPHSect6.pdf ❑ Yes. ❑ No. If Yes, indicate the name of the regional park, reserve, or trail and describe potential impacts and mitigations plans below: ❑ Yes. Year adopted: ❑ No. May 2011 8 t Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form SECTION 7: IMPLEMENTATION http://www.metrocouncil.org�ptanningLLPH LPHSect7-.pdf N ❑ Yes. ❑ No. If Yes, describe proposed changes and timeline for making those changes below: x ❑ Yes. ❑ No. If Yes, identify applicable ordinances below: DON'T FORGET! A complete comprehensive plan amendment submittal must include the following: ❑ Completed CPA Submittal Form _.' ❑ Staff report regarding CPA ❑ Other relevant information related to the CPA And the fdllowing color maps: ❑ General location of CPA ❑ Current planned land use ©, :.Proposed plannned land use change ❑ Current sewer stagan ❑� ?roposN " ewer stagffiMchenges" l= x�sting n ver I�MLC�S if available} sk u May 2011 9 orS E es On1 :,,; fflllo G / �, �� � / 1 x ,,,E EE \.�,� h. ;�^ ft`� /, .�. �/� �,,,,, ,E� EE,, .n•_ "� ,�\r E � .. EEEr,E,. � r ,•,,, J, E6r r� 9 ,,\\ a;�:ZF :at may. ., uunE. •p •. , i. ;< •: ✓ r,E,E � � a • d E, \�T..� 'r N ,. .. ;... . "•' . ,,; 1 "'EE _ ,�' .... ,:.:::: � �\ �.2� �., R , E , \Q� ,/ E E; , � : rt >,Ei'�';,ys 9: ; �I �` /% �:,1 / Yom; Cit # mid 1 10 0 �"E� '•',uy , ir �_�\ ✓ E s ,E•� ». a `.� Y E �..�.. = < i ., s J' \ - Z � c "" / . + ..- �+ ; yy :;. �, yq :.. .. /r/ . »... i'• � E .:a • u ;, r , E� /pY� �'/ { E,,,E �: \ '�. :�.:� i �; _ � � :�:- P fir'' ti .. v,:...��J .:. ". :. •, .. .', J .«, EE':. �� ��, w,A.�,��, .3..E #��/ /�. std J..:<m; �.�� l�K` .^- MOTE: Communities that participate in the Council's Plat Monitoring Program do not need to complete thes form. Data from K w `the Program will be used in place of information here =••, . %� Residential Projects Approved and Constructed From Local 2008 CPU Adoption to Present VY T r�gl u1tr � Acres ;Public Ages Acr�:s �. Ni 1. Camel Farrel Nand ' Parks , \ ti Y Y eter ! Net bend r' i of # of Acres Grass Ater Open ' Unde 'elci ed Resideetteal" x F' Units Ueeii s kesldii al files S ace Lana Aches cre . Sp DeVela tYferlt p . r Peer 5 z Name Dyed° BUe lt w', •. \ : y ,y r ............ ................... ...................................................... .................. ........ .............................. ...................... . ................ ....... .........:....... ............ ........ ....................... .... ....... ... ... ...................................... ..................... ........... ...................................... ................ ........ .............................. . ......... €E€E ........................................................ ..........._...... ................................ s................................................... ..... ........ ........................................ ................................. .. ................................... ................... ._ ........... .................... ............. .... ................................................. ....._. ........................... ................. ........................................... ..... .......................... '............ ...._.......... ..................... .......... ...... ....................... ........... ........ . . . . .. . ........ . .... ................ .............. ...._..._.............................................................................. .... ................................................... ... .. ........................... ....` .........._ _._ .........._...................... .... _..... .... ............... .. ........................ • .......... ..... ...................................................................................................... _ _ _ .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................__..................................................... ............................ _ ..... . ... ...............................................................................................................................................................................................'..._................ ............................... . . ......... ... .. . TOTALS * Describe on a separate page any other undeveloped land that does not fall under one of the other categories in the table above, including steep slopes, outlots for future residential or commercial development, or other land protected by local ordinances. Remaining Land Guided for Residential Uses through 2030 AI \ steeelfat+d Acres Este atel Ist%rriated= Wetlands.: &Mat ;R D v H e c e e apab�e lvciwst to ed ighest Alla1 .s Y Grans, Ages Bodees Open Space Acreseslty s d y � -'Land 6 Land .___.. _._..._... .............. ........._..."' .___.._ . _...__... ..........._ .. ..._..__.. ................... .........._.. ..._........ __._... _............ ........_........... .............. ................. ........._... __....._ __....._....... ...._............ .. ................ ...... ......_.... ........... .___.. .._....... ....._........... ._........ _._._.. _...._.. ..._.... .__ ._.....__. ............ ............ ...._........ __._._ ...._..._....... ......._ ..... ... .......... ...... .... _.._......._.. ...._.._.._ .........._. ................. ....... .............. .... _........_..__........ ___.._ .....__ . ................... ......._.._. ..____.. _._...._. _ ,..._...... _........_ .. .................. .............. .._...... _....... ........_. .............. .. ........... .............. .. .......... .................. ...... ......_.... .. .. .................... ............ ....__..... ......... __...._. .._..._.. ... . _ ........... ..........._.._. __..._... ..__.... .._..._. __ ._.._... .................. ...._........... .........._..._ ____. ............ ................ .. .._.._....... ...... ....._...... ........ _............._ .... _.............. ... ..._........ ............_ .__......... ......... May 2011 10 ty n Business and Development .BroaUy Center Department www. cityofbrooklyncenter. org 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199 Phone 763.569.3300 TTY/Voice 711 Fax 763.569.3494 MEMORANDUM TO: Chair Sean Rahn and Planning Commissioners FROM: Gary Eitel, Business & Development Director Tim Benetti, Planning & Zoning Specialist DATE: January 6, 2012 RE: Agenda Item No. 12.13 — Consideration of the 2012 Community Development Activities Map As most of the Commissioners are aware, planning staff has periodically provided updates and led discussion sessions regarding the Community Development Activities Map (2011 map attached for review). This map was intended to be used as a tool in illustrating and identifying potential and/or ongoing development sites; project or study corridor areas; opportunity sites and others. With the beginning of this new year, Staff is preparing an updated "2012 Community Development Activities Map" for your review and input, which we hope to present at the January 26 or other future meeting. For next Thursday night's meeting, Staff intends to review the old 2011 map and provide an update, along with targeted or suggested areas of study, and certain potential redevelopment sites and projects. Ongoing Planning Activities • Twin Lakes Regional Trail Extension — 57 Avenue corridor • Twin Lakes Regional Trail to Shingle Creek Regional Trail • Environmental clean-up plan for the Howe Fertilizer site • Shingle Creek Trail adjacent to Community Center • Northport Elementary School and Northport Community Park Master Planning (developing a concept) 2012 Development Activities • Luther Auto Group — Phase III • Northwest Family Services Center a) 71 Avenue/NW Family entrance improvements • Northwest Athletic Club /Lifetime Fitness site (4001 Lakebreeze Avenue) • Shingle Creek Crossing a) PUD amendments b) Sears store • Maranatha Nursing Home and Care Center (5401 -5415 69 Avenue North) • Central Commerce District a) Opportunity Site b) Former Jerry's Foods site • New Millennium Academy - proposed charter school at Palmer Lake Plaza- 6850 Shingle Creek Pkwy. • Eastbrook Estates 2 nd Addition • Redevelopment of EDA Properties a) Embassy Suites Phase II site b) Former Olive Garden/Cracker Barrel site Staff encourages you to provide any input or questions on these and other sites as part of our discussion process. Until then, if you have any questions, feel free to call Gary at 569 -3305 or Tim at 569 -3319 (email GEitel ,ci.brooklyn- center.mn.us or TBenettinci .brooklyn- center.mn.us). 0 1 2011 Community Development Activities 1 Redevelopment of 8+ acres 9 L 6 h h 14 :0 12 4 4 a g e i h 1 1- 1- 1 4 L. L 1 I i 8. Conceptual Planning ff Former Racquet Club Site A s C = D E F c EDA's 8.6 Acres, and excess MNDot R-O.W. Centro's 23.2 Acres Twin Lake Trail Goldmark's 8 Acres opportunities Opportunity Site Update 2. Real Estate Recycling ir 9. Marketing of Phase 11 60,000 sq.ft multi tenant EDA Site - Link to EBHC, Pond, Fountain office/warehouse building 2 v. 10. FBI Development arid 3. 57th Avenue and Logan EDA marketing of Northern .6 acres Completion of remaining 5 acres MPCA vapor remediation - Southern 8 acres 3 Marketing for EDA redevelopement 1 I 1.Humboldt Ave Corridor - `` s __. Enhancement opportunities 4. Twin Lakes Trail extension to Mississippi 4 12.Phase III Luther Regional Park Auto, Honda, Toyota NAME 5. Brookdale Redevelopment Shingle Creek Crossing - Town Center Market 6,700 sq ft Commercial Building 6. EDNs redevelopment of 1.06 Acres 14.Nodhwest Family Service Former Boulevard Community Development Center - 63,000 sq ft Office, Bar and Grill site P Ramp, and Intersection rojects Improvements 7. Shingle Creek Enhancements 15.Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Trail and Daylighting Study / Reimaging City n �, Business and Development BroojU Center Department www. cityofbrooklyncenter. org 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 -2199 Phone 763.569.3300 TTYNoice 711 Fax 763.569.3494 MEMORANDUM TO: Chair Sean Rahn and Planning Commissioners FROM: Gary Eitel, Business & Development Director Tim Benetti, Planning & Zoning Specialisyt DATE: January 6, 2012 RE: Agenda Item No. 12.0 — Update of the City's Landscape Points System and Tree /Woodland Preservation At the December 15, 2011 meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to study the City's landscape (points system) policy, and related tree /woodland preservation regulations. Staff is prepared to investigate the following communities' ordinances and/or policies and develop a comparison of those landscape regulations in comparison to our own: Tree Architectural CITY landscape Preservation Standards Crystal Fridley Golden Valley Maplewood New Hope Richfield Roseville Shoreview White Bear Lake O — ordinance adopted P -policy Staff is not suggesting our research will be limited to just those communities listed; moreover, we are requesting the Commission provide approval, further direction or indications of other communities you wish us to investigate. As also indicated, Staff is expanding the investigation to include architectural standards, on account the Commission may be called upon to provide direction or formulate a new set of standards for architectural and building materials sometime in the near future. If you have any questions, feel free to call Gary at 569 -3305 or Tim at 569 -3319 (email GEitelgci.brooklyn- center.mn.us or TBenetti gci.brooklyn- center.mn.us).