Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 04-23 CCP Regular Session i AGENDA CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION April 23, 2012 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers A copy of the frill City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary. 1. City Council Discussion of Agenda Items and Questions 2. Miscellaneous 3. Discussion of Work Session Agenda Items as Time Permits 4. Adjourn i III *X Amended *x CITY COUNCIL MEETING City of Brooklyn Center April 23, 2012 AGENDA I 1. Informal Open Forum with City Council—6:45 p.m. —provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with citizens. Questions from the Council will be for clarification only. Open Forum will not be used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the comments made but, rather, for hearing the citizen for informational purposes only. 2. Invocation—7 p.m. —Presentation of Colors by St. Aiphonsus Boy Scout Troop 454 3. Call to Order Regular Business Meeting —The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary. 4. Roll Call 5. Pledge of Allegiance 6. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda —The following items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Council Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes 1. April 9, 2012— Study Session 2. April 9, 2012—Regular Session 3. April 11, 2012—Joint Session with Commissions b. Licenses C. Resolution Supporting the City of Brooklyn Center's Minnesota Safe Routes to School Planning Assistance Grant Application d. Resolution Amending Funding Sources, Improvement Project No. 2010-16, Contract 2010-I, Shingle Creels Restoration Improvements e. Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Site Lease Agreement with Zayo Group, LLC X* Amended ** CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- April 23,2012 f Resolution Accepting Quotations and Awarding a Contract for 2012 Diseased Tree Removal Program g. Resolution Supporting an Application by Aeon for a Hennepin County Environmental Financial Grant (View Pointe at Shingle Creek) 7. Presentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations a. Building and Community Standards Annual Report Requested Council Action: —Motion to receive report. b. Proclamation Declaring May 20-26, 2012, Public Works Week in Brooklyn Center Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt proclamation. 8. Public Hearings —None. 9. Planning Commission Items a. Planning Commission Application No. 2012-002 Submitted by Paul Hyde of Real Estate Recycling, LLC. Request for the Approval of Rezoning of Land Located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue from C-2 (Commerce) to PUD-MIXED C-2/I-1 (Planned Unit Development-Mixed Commerce and Industrial Park). The Planning Commission recommended approval of this application at its April 12, 2012, meeting. 1. Resolution Regarding the Recommended Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2012-002 Submitted by Paul Hyde of Real Estate Recycling, LLC, for the Rezoning of Land Located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North From C2 (Commerce) to PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 (Planned Unit Development-Mixed Commerce and Industrial Park) Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt resolution. *x 2. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Code of Ordinances Regarding the Zoning Classification of Certain Land Generally Located in the Most Southerly Section of the City of Brooklyn Center, Situated Between Azelia Avenue North to the West, Lakebreeze Avenue North to the North, and Highway 100 to the East and South (addressed at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North) Requested Council Action: —Motion to approve first reading and set second reading and Public Hearing for May 14, 2012. * Amended CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- April 23, 2012 b. Planning Commission Application No. 2012-005 Submitted by Border Foods, Inc. Request for the Approval of a Variance to City Code Section 35-703 and Site and Building Plan Approval of a New Taco Bell Restaurant Located at 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this application at its April 12, 2012, meeting. 1. Resolution Regarding the Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2012-005 Submitted by Border Foods, Inc. for the Approval of a Variance to City Code Section 35-703 and Site and Building Plan Approval of a New Taco Bell Restaurant, Located at 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt resolution. 10. Council Consideration Items a. Consideration of Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for 5240 Drew Avenue North Requested Council Action: —Receive staff report. —Motion to open hearing. —Receive testimony from applicant. —Motion to close hearing. —Take action on rental license application and mitigation plan. b. Consideration of Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for 4306 65th Avenue North Requested Council Action: —Receive staff report. —Motion to open hearing. —Receive testimony from applicant. —Motion to close hearing. —Take action on rental license application and mitigation plan. C. Resolution Ordering Corrections of Hazardous and Nuisance Conditions at 6701 Bryant Ave North, Brooklyn Center Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt resolution. 11. Council Report 12. Adjournment Agenda Items Tabled or Continued An Ordinance Amending Chapter 4 of the Brooklyn Center City Charter, Sections 4.01 and 4.02 —This item was first read on April 12, 2010; was published in the official newspaper on April 22, 2010; and the Public Hearing was continued at the May 10, 2010, meeting until such time as the Charter Commission makes its recommendation to the City Council. April 23, 2012 Randall G. Christensen 7001 Regent Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 PE1S/Maranatlia Application 2012-003 I would like to ask that the application received on or about March 19, 2012 regarding 5401 and t 5415 69`x' Avenue North be denied as it was an incomplete application, and that they be asked to resubmit a completed application. Please reference the April 9, 2012 memorandum to Tim Benetti from Steven L. Lillehaug, which states there are items missing from the application. These items are required as part of Ordinance 35-355. Without a complete application, it would be impossible for the City to comply with any Public Hearing requirements per its Charter or for the public to have an informed opinion at a Public Hearing. Furthermore, there are several issues with the project that were either unanswered, unclear or were missing from the application at the time of the Planning Commission's Public Hearing. For these.. and many other reasons, the motion to approve was tabled. The public needs, and deserves, to have an informed opinion on developments that are going to impact them, their families and their investments for the next 50 plus years. Respectfully submitted, F City Council Agenda Item No. 6a MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION APRIL 9, 2012 CITY HALL—COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Carol Kleven, Kay Lasman, Lin Myszkowski, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, and Carla Wirth, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS It was the consensus of the City Council to accept the following correction the March 26, 2012, Regular Session minutes: Page 12, 4th Paragraph "...Police and Citizens Award Ceremony is scheduled for April 15, 2012,..." Councilmember Myszkowski requested discussion on Item 6c, Resolution Recognizing the Designation of 2012 Planting List of Allowable Boulevard Tree Species. She asked whether "boulevard" was defined as the green space between the sidewalk and the curb. City Manager Curt Boganey stated that is correct. Councilmember Myszkowski asked how frequently residents violate the ordinance by planting unallowable trees in the boulevard. Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug explained the City often uses the list of recommended trees species with reconstruction projects and the reforestation program. With regard to how often there are resident violations relating to boulevard tree planting, Mr. Lillehaug explained the City does not monitor on a proactive basis and he is not aware of any offenses. Mayor Willson noted the list of approved tree species dovetails with the Arbor Day recognition as Tree City. Mr. Lillehaug confirmed that was the case and indicated the list of allowable boulevard tree species is a requirement to become a Tree City. 04/09/12 -1- DRAFT MISCELLANEOUS Councilmember Kleven noted Police Officer Zabel will be p resented with the prestigious Brad Manor/Frank Thissen Award by the Colonel of the State Patrol. She stated this award is given to only six officers annually and suggested the City Council adopt a resolution congratulating Officer Zabel on a job well done. Mayor Willson noted Detective Mike Coleman will be receiving the Hennepin County Merit of Achievement Award. Councilmember Lasman agreed it is appropriate to recognize accomplishments and suggested Mr. Boganey review whether similar awards in the last few years have been recognized in the same manner. She explained if the City Council supports making a formal recognition, she wants to be sure someone is not missed. Councilmember Ryan suggested this type of recognition occur on April 18, 2012, during the Police and Citizens Awards Ceremony. Mr. Boganey supported the approach suggested by Councilmember Ryan to provide recognition once a year because it would reduce the likelihood that someone is missed or others feel they were overlooked. He stated he would get input from Police Chief Benner relating to which awards should be recognized locally for inclusion in a resolution. The consensus of the City Council was to support an annual recognition of professional organization awards during the Police and Citizen Awards Ceremony. Councilmember Lasman requested an update on the status of Mr. BBQ. Mr. Boganey stated his understanding is that Mr. BBQ has not yet paid for or received a liquor license or certificate of occupancy but is planning to open and has advertised an event on May 5, 2012. Councilmember Kleven announced that Applebee's is undergoing remodeling. Councilmember Ryan referenced the information he provided to the City Council from Metro Cities relating to opposition of pending Senate File 1741/House File 1954 setting reporting requirements for city budget line items. He noted this is another example of an unfunded mandate where cities bear the cost and expressed concern this bill may result in a negative impact to Brooklyn Center. Councilmember Ryan suggested the City send letters to its State Senator, State Representative, and Governor expressing its objection to this bill as written. Councilmember Lasman asked whether Director of Fiscal and Support Services Dan Jordet had reviewed the pending bill language. Mr. Boganey stated he probably has. Mr. Boganey stated he reviewed the bill and agrees it is another unfunded mandate requiring additional work without much value to the general public at this point. He indicated the League of Minnesota Cities opposes adoption and the City supports those efforts. Following discussion, the consensus of the City Council was to direct Mr. Boganey to draft a 04/09/12 -2- DRAFT i letter to the City's legislative delegation and Governor Dayton stating objection to Senate File 1741/House File 1954. Mayor Willson announced the following events: April 10th Brooklyns Youth Council Meeting; April 11th Council/Commissions meeting, April 13th Brooklyn Center Fire Department Appreciation Dinner at Crowne Plaza; April 14th buffet lunch at Great India Restaurant to welcome Vice President Naseem Mandi of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community USA; April 14th EarthFest; April 15th Fire Department pancake breakfast; April 17th Community Garden Club meeting at Happy Hollow Park; April 18th Brooklyn Center Police and Citizens Awards Ceremony; April 19th Mayor Willson has speaking engagement at ITT Tech; May 1st FBI ribbon cutting ceremony; May 1st Visit Minneapolis North grand opening at its new location at Noithland Circle in Brooklyn Park; May 3rd Mayor Willson has speaking engagement at a Robbinsdale School District meeting; May 5th Prayer Breakfast; May 18th Golf Tournament at Centerbrook Golf Course; and,May 31 st Memorial Service. DISCUSSION OF WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEMS AS TIME PERMITS OPPORTUNITY TO ACQUIRE 6101 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD AS PART OF THE REIMAGING OF BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR Mr. Eitel used an aerial map to point out the properties under City ownership in the area of Brooklyn Boulevard. He advised that Mr. Doua Vang, owner of 6101 Brooklyn Boulevard, is offering the EDA the opportunity to acquire this commercial lot for its 2011 taxable market value of$113,398. Mr. Eitel displayed pictures of the subject site, existing house, and 20,307 sq. ft. corner lot zoned C-1 Service/Office District. He also noted other properties on Brooklyn Boulevard that may be offered for sale in the near future. If approved for purchase, the negotiations would deduct any dollars necessary to pay for relocation benefits to Mr. Vang's son, who currently resides in the house. Mr. Eitel noted control of this property allows the City to look at the future uses in this area to ensure the entrance to this neighborhood is enhanced and position the City for properties to the north. He asked the City Council if it feels the acquisition of this commercial lot and removal of this single-family residence will have a positive effect on improving the image of Brooklyn Boulevard and if it is in the public's interest to direct staff to pursue negotiations for the acquisition of 6101 Brooklyn Boulevard through the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) 3 housing funds. He advised that if this property is not used for residential purposes, it is required that the fiends be paid back to TIF 3. Councilmember Ryan noted the acquisition of this property and the Cars for Heart property, if it came into play, could result in a parcel in excess of five acres. He indicated if TIF 3 funds are used for this purchase and the property is developed other than residential, it would not be a large obstacle to reimburse the TIF 3 funds because a development plan would come forward. Mr. Eitel stated that is correct. The City Council and Mr. Eitel discussed the potential redevelopment site for commercial, service, medical, or office that could be created in this area. 04/09/12 -3- DRAFT Councilmember Lasman asked whether the cost for demolition and clearing is estimated at $15,000. Mr. Eitel answered in the affirmative. Councilmember Lasman stated the acquisition of this parcel fits the direction defined in the City's 2020 and 2030 Comprehensive Plans to move Brooklyn Boulevard away from residential use and into commercial use. She supported moving forward subject to staff negotiating a favorable purchase price. Councilmember Kleven noted it is expected that all of the single-family homes along Brooklyn. Boulevard, including this property, will be gone in the future so if TIF funds are used, they will need to be reimbursed. Mr. Eitel indicated if the parcel is used for housing it is eligible for TIF 3 housing funding and if not used in that way the property will be purchased for another use and then the funds will be reimbursed to TIF 3. Mayor Willson reviewed the efforts of the City since the early 1990s to purchase smaller parcels along Brooklyn Boulevard for commercial use rather than housing. He noted this has been a long-term effort and the current economy and foreclosures, have created an opportunity for the City to acquire some parcels. Mayor Willson stated his support to move forward with the purchase of this parcel. Councilmember Myszkowski stated she wholly supports this purchase as a step towards redevelopment of the area. She asked whether the City Council is able to discuss negotiating strategy in closed session. Mr. Eitel answered in the affirmative. Councilmember Ryan stated he supports both policy questions in the affirmative. The consensus of the City Council was to find that the acquisition of 6101 Brooklyn Boulevard and removal of this single-family residence will have a positive impact on improving the image of Brooklyn Boulevard and it is in the public's interest to pursue negotiations for the purchase of this parcel through the use of TIF 3 Funds. ADJOURN STUDY SESSION TO INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the Study Session at 6:45 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. RECONVENE STUDY SESSION Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to reconvene the Study Session at 6:51 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. NIMS FOR ELECTED LEADERS 04/09/12 -4- DRAFT Mr. Boganey reviewed that in October of 2005, the City Council adopted the National Incident Management System (NIMS) as the standard for incident management. He explained elected and appointed officials of a community need to be directly involved in NIMS preparedness elements, especially when the community exercised its emergency management policies, plans, procedures, and resources. There is also a requirement that all participants receive appropriate training. Mr. Boganey asked the City Council if it would be interested in scheduling a one-hour training presentation. Following a brief discussion, it was the consensus of the City Council to schedule NIMS training on April 16, 2012, at 6 p.m., with April 30, 2012, as a back up date. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to close the Study Session at 6:56 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 04/09/12 -5- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION APRIL 9, 2012 CITY HALL— COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:45 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Carol Kleven, Kay Lasman, Lin Myszlcowski, Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Carla Wirth, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Mayor Tim Willson opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum. Jimmy Longoria, 113 9th Avenue N., Hopkins, invited the City Council to attend the April 14th EarthFest and April 15th wall mural painting demonstration at Grandview Park. Walt Wenholz, 501 69th Avenue N., commented on overnight parking violations by River Glen Apartment residents and requested the installation of"No Parking" signs on both sides of 691h Avenue N. City Manager Curt Boganey stated he will refer this information to the Administrative Traffic Committee for review and recommendation on the best approach. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Myszlcowski seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 6:51 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 2. INVOCATION Councilmember Kleven introduced Pastor Doug Mork, Cross of Glory Lutheran Church, who provided the Invocation. 3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING 04/09/12 -1- DRAFT The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 7:01 p.m. 4. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Carol Kleven, Kay Lasman, Lin Myszkowski, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Carla Wirth, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda with amendments to the Regular Session minutes of March 26, 2012, and the following consent items were approved: 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. March 26, 2012—Study Session 2. March 26, 2012—Regular Session 3. March 26, 2012—Work Session 6b. LICENSES LIQUOR—CLASS A ON-SALE INTOXICATING, SUNDAY, AND 2 A.M. Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC dba Crowne Plaza Minneapolis, MN 2200 Freeway Boulevard MECHANICAL Bonfe's Plumbing Heating & Air 505 Randolph Avenue, St. Paul Centeipoint Energy 9320 Evergreen Blvd., Coon Rapids Fireside Hearth& Home 2700 Fairview Avenue N., Roseville Infinity Heating& Air 1017 Meadowood Drive, Brooklyn Park M&D Plumbing &Heating 11050 26"' Street NE, St. Michael Marsh Heating & A/C 6248 Lakeland Ave. N., Brooklyn Park McDowall Company P.O. Box 606, Waite Park St. Cloud Refrigeration dba SCR 604 Lincoln Avenue NE, St. Cloud Southtown Refrigeration 6325 Sandburg Road, Golden Valley RENTAL INITIAL (TYPE III—one-year license) 5727 James Avenue N. Amelia Zachariason 04/09/12 -2- DRAFT i INITIAL (TYPE II—two-year license) 111862,d Avenue N. Nate Armstrong 7208 Bryant Avenue N. Prosperous Property, Inc. 5207 Drew Avenue N. Sarah Vogt 5113 Ewing Avenue N. Angela Baumann 5320 James Avenue N. Jeff Hudson 5524 Logan Avenue N. Marls Olson RENEWAL (TYPE III—one-year license) 7025 Drew Avenue N. Passed w/Weather Deferral Ryan Ray Yardley RENEWAL (TYPE II—two-year license) 161268 th Lane N. Frank Lachinski 1543 Humboldt Place N. Passed w/Weather Deferral Peter Imasuen 4113 Lakebreeze Avenue Pamela Grover RENEWAL (TYPE I—three-year license) 3501 47th Avenue N. Richard Grommes 3614 50th Avenue N. Kjirsten Bjerlce-Keenan 5200 France Avenue N. Christian Knutson 4408 69 th Avenue N. Eugene &Diane Wright 7137 Grimes Avenue N. Shawn Banks 7085 Unity Avenue N. Swendia LLC SIGNHANGER Indigo Signworks, Inc. P.O. Box 1476, Fargo Signminds 1400 Quincy Street, Minneapolis 6c. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-52 DESIGNATING 2012 PLANTING LIST OF ALLOWABLE BOULEVARD TREE SPECIES Motion passed unanimously. 7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS 7a. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-53 RECOGNIZING THE DESIGNATION OF BROOKLYN CENTER AS A TREE CITY USA FOR THE TWENTIETH CONSECUTIVE YEAR City Manager Curt Boganey introduced the item and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Kleven seconded to approve RESOLUTION 04/09/12 -3- DRAFT i i NO. 2012-53 Recognizing the Designation of Brooklyn Center as a Tree City USA for the Twentieth Consecutive Year. Motion passed unanimously. 7b. PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 27, 2012, AS ARBOR DAY AND MAY 2012, AS ARBOR MONTH IN BROOKLYN CENTER Mr. Boganey introduced the item and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution. Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to approve PROCLAMATION Declaring April 27, 2012, to be Arbor Day and May 2012 to be Arbor Month in Brooklyn Center. The Council recognized and thanked Sons of the American Legion for its donation to cover expenses for the Arbor Day event. Motion passed unanimously. 7c. PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 21-28, 2012, AS THE GREAT SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED CLEANUP WEEK AND APRIL 22, 2012, AS EARTH DAY IN BROOKLYN CENTER Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug introduced the item and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution. He advised of the scheduled cleanup activities and volunteer opportunities. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to approve PROCLAMATION Declaring April 21-28, 2012, to be the Great Shingle Creek Watershed Cleanup Week and April 22, 2012,to be Earth Day in Brooklyn Center. Motion passed unanimously. 7d. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-54 EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR THE DONATION OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER CRIME PREVENTION PROGRAM IN SUPPORT OF THE 2012 CSI SAFETY ACADEMY PROGRAM Mr. Boganey introduced the item and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution to accept a donation of$1,500 from the Brooklyn Center Crime Prevention Program to be used to support the 2012 CSI Safety Academy Program. Councilmember Lasman stated she is the City Council's Crime Prevention Program Liaison. She indicated this Program has existed for 30 years in Brooklyn Center and reviewed its many contributions, noting it exists through fundraising and donations. Councilmember Lasman encouraged residents to support the efforts of the Crime Prevention Program by participating in its fundraising events including the May 18,2012, tournament at Centerbrook Golf Course. 04/09/12 -4- DRAFT Councilmember Myszkowski moved and Councilmember Kleven seconded to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2012-54 Expressing Appreciation for the Donation of the Brooklyn Center Crime Prevention Program in Support of the 2012 CSI Safety Academy Program. Motion passed unanimously. 7e. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-55 EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR THE DONATION OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER POLICE ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT OF THE 2012 CSI SAFETY ACADEMY PROGRAM Mr. Boganey introduced the item and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution to accept a donation of$375 from the Brooklyn Center Police Association to be used to support the 2012 CSI Safety Academy.Program. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Kleven seconded to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2012-55 Expressing Appreciation for the Donation of the Brooklyn Center Police Association in Support of the 2012 CSI Safety Academy Program. Motion passed unanimously. 7f. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-56 RECOGNIZING AND EXPRESSING APPRECIATION OF THE VOLUNTEERISM OF EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Mr. Boganey introduced the item and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2012-56 Recognizing and Expressing Appreciation of the Volunteerism of Employees of the City of Brooklyn Center. The Council added its personal appreciation and thanked City staff for its generous volunteerism. Mayor Willson read the resolution in full. Motion passed unanimously. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS -None. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS -None. 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 04/09/12 -5- DRAFT 10a. CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE FOR 5742 FREMONT AVENUE NORTH Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning advised that 5742 Fremont Avenue North was inspected and 13 property code violations were cited and ultimately corrected. There have been zero validated police incidents/nuisance calls within the last 12 months. This property qualifies for a Type IV six-month provisional rental license based on the number of property code violations found during the initial rental license inspection. The property owner is also required to submit a mitigation plan and report monthly on the progress of that plan. Ms. Schleuning reviewed actions taken in regard to this rental license application and indicated Staff has reviewed that mitigation plan and held discussion with the property owner and recommends approval based on meeting standards in the mitigation plan. Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to open the hearing. Motion passed unanimously. No one appeared to address the Council. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Kleven seconded to close the hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to approve the issuance of a Type IV six-month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for 5742 Fremont Avenue N., with the requirement that the mitigation plan must be strictly adhered to before a renewal rental license would be considered. Motion passed unanimously. 10b. CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE FOR 3400 66"AVENUE NORTH Ms. Schleuning advised that 3400 66th Avenue North was inspected and 11 property code violations were cited and ultimately corrected. There have been zero validated police incidents/nuisance calls within the last 12 months. This property qualifies for a Type IV six- month provisional rental license based on the number of property code violations found during the initial rental license inspection. The property owner is also required to submit a mitigation plan and report monthly on the progress of that plan. Ms. Schleuning reviewed actions taken in regard to this rental license application and indicated Staff has reviewed that mitigation plan and held discussion with the property owner and recommends approval based on meeting standards in the mitigation plan. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to open the hearing. z 04/09/12 -6- DRAFT i I Motion passed unanimously. Solomon Frank-Sawari, 4200 West Broadway Avenue, commented on his efforts to work cooperatively with staff to complete the rental license process. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to approve the issuance of a Type IV six-month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for 3400 66th Avenue N., with the requirement that the mitigation plan must be strictly adhered to before a renewal rental license would be considered. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Willson thanked City Attorney Charlie LeFevere for his recommendation and effort to draft the rental license ordnance and program, noting it has been very successful. He also thanked City Manager Curt Boganey for the successful implementation of this program and Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning for working with property owners and landlords to complete the rental license application process. Mayor Willson indicated the rental licensing program is working, successful, and cited staff's involvement and fortitude to keep this process moving forward. Mr. Boganey acknowledged that it has not been easy and been learning process but the program was creating the results the City Council desired. Mayor Willson commended the City Council for malting an excellent decision to support adoption of the rental license ordinance and protect the interest of Brooklyn Center residents. 11. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember Myszkowski reminded citizens that the annual water main flushing will begin on Sunday evening. She announced the following events: April 17th Park and Recreation Commission hosted meeting on the proposed community garden; and, April 18th annual Police and Citizens Awards Ceremony. Councilmember Ryan reported on his attendance at the following: ® April 2, 2012, Brooklyns Youth Council Meeting Councilmember Ryan announced the following events: April 12th Brooklyns Youth Council Future Fair; April 1 lth joint annual meeting with the City Council and City Commissions; April 13t1i annual Firefighters Relief Association Dinner; April 15th annual Firefighters Relief Association Pancake Breakfast; and April 14th EarthFest. Councilmember Kleven reported on-her attendance at the following: 04/09/12 -7- DRAFT • March 29, 2012, Planning Commission Meeting • March 31, 2012, 20th anniversary for the Remodeling Fair Councilmember Kleven reviewed the efforts of H.O.M.E. to help elderly residents remain in their homes and stated their contact information. She then announced the April 15th event relating to the upcoming mural painting of the Mn/DOT sound wall behind the Earle Brown Elementary School and encouraged everyone to volunteer. Councilmember Lasman announced the April 18th Police and Citizens Awards Ceremony at Constitution Hall and encouraged all to attend. She also announced the April 21" Shingle Creek Cleanup event and encouraged residents to participate. Mayor Willson reported on his attendance at the following: • April 3, 2012, Brooklyn Center Fire Department Relief Association Quarterly Meeting • April 7, 2012, Eagle Scout Court of Honor Ceremony for Enyinnaya I.U. Okwulehie Mayor Willson announced the May 1St FBI ribbon cutting ceremony and May 5th Annual Faith Based Prayer Breakfast at Earle Brown Heritage Center. Mr. Boganey announced the CSI Academy will beheld August 14-15,2012, as advertised in the City Watch. 12. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 7:51 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 04/09/12 -8- DRAFT i MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA i RECEPTION AND JOINT WORK SESSION WITH CITY COMMISSIONS APRIL 11, 2012 COMMUNITY CENTER—CONSTITUTION HALL RECEPTION A Reception and general conversation period was held in Constitution Hall from 6:00 p.m. until 6:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Joint Work Session with the Charter, Housing, Financial, Park and Recreation, and Planning Commissions and was called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:35 p.m. INTRODUCTIONS City Manager Curt Boganey provided background information about each Commission and welcomed those in attendance. IN ATTENDANCE Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Carol Kleven, Kay Lasman, Lin Myszkowski, and Dan Ryan. City Staff present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, Police Chief Kevin Benner, Community Activities, Recreation and Services Director Jim Glasoe, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Planning and Zoning Specialist Tim Benetti, and Finance Director Dan Jordet. Commissioners present were Charter Commissioners Stan Leino, Eric Pone, Bee Yang; Housing Commissioners Kris Lawrence-Anderson, Kathy Amdahl, Peggy Lynn; Planning Commissioners Sean Rahn and Scott Burfeind; Financial Commissioners Steve Landis, Dan Schueller, Dean Van Der Werf, and Rex Newman; Park and Recreation Commissioners Bud Sorenson, Roger Peterson, and Dan Starling. PRESENTATIONS BY CITY COMMISSIONS Charter Commission: Charter Commission Chair Stan Leino stated that the Commission is more vibrant this year with improved membership, allowing a quorum for more meetings. He stated the Commission supported a 2008 referendum ballot for an administrative fine system that is in place. The City Charter is like a constitution where members are appointed by a Chief Judge. 04/11/12 Page 1 DRAFT He added that the Charter Commission is looking at housekeeping changes, reviewing language regarding eminent domain, and the type of Council seat assignments (ward, at-large, hybrid). They have one vacant position left. Anyone interested should apply by submitting a letter to the Chief Judge. Housing Commission: Housing Commission Chair Kris Lawrence-Anderson talked about projects the Commission is working on and the city goals they address. The New Neighbor Welcome Program has been successful. The Cities of New Hope and Brooklyn Park are interested in the program and how it works. They are looking at the evolution of the program to include more involvement with Neighborhood Watch Captains and high school students. In 2011, 187 bags were delivered, 52% were welcomed in person. The Housing Commission is working with the Park and Recreation Commission in researching and creating a Community Garden in Happy Hollow Park. A resident meeting will be held on April 17, 2012 at Happy Hollow Park to get feedback about the site and program. Park and Recreation Commission: Park and Recreation Commission Chair Bud Sorenson provided an overview of Commission activities. The Commission continues to review Firehouse Park where the basketball hoops were temporarily removed. The Commission is reviewing ways to reinstall the basketball hoops without the basketball activities becoming a nuisance to the neighbors. Other projects in 2011 included participating in Adopt-a-Park in Marlin and Lakeside, reviewing the 2012-2026 Capital Improvements for parks, monitoring CARS activities and Capital Improvement Plan, reviewing park informational signs (including dogs on leash and nonmotorized vehicle use), reviewing community gardens (Happy Hollow Parlc under consideration), providing ideas to improve user experience at Centerbrook Golf Course, developing a No Smoking in Parks Policy to restrict smoking where children are present, and reviewing the Shingle Creek restoration project. The Commission will continue to review current and new programs in 2012 to address city goals. Planning Commission: Plaluling Commission Chair Sean Rahn provided an overview of projects the Planning Commission reviewed in 2011. The Commission reviewed 23 projects, 17 approved by the City Council. Projects included Precision Inc., Palmer Lake Plaza, Shingle Creek Crossing, Autozone, Allied Building Supply, Luther Auto Phase III, Honda & Toyota, Cloutier Variance, Evergreen Villas (preliminary and final plat), Evans Nordby funeral home remodeling project combined 3 lots into 1, and Brooklyn Center High School site plan for recreation center. Projects under review for 2012 include office/manufacturing building at 4001 Lakebreeze, Maranatha Homes remodel, Border Foods (Taco Bell) rebuild, Shingle Creek Crossing project continued, and France Ave Business Center. Other projects the Commission will be researching in 2012 include the landscape policy, architectural standards, sign ordinance, subdivision standards, Brooklyn Boulevard study 2011-2012, and future trails. Projects under construction include Regional FBI (just completed in February 2012), Walmart, Shingle Creels Daylighting project, and Northwest Family Service Center. Financial Commission: Financial Commission Chair Rex Newman provided an overview of the Commission activities. The primary goal is to work with the City Council to develop the budget. The process starts in June/July. In 2011 several meetings were held to review the 2012 budget. The Commission aims to balance excellent quality with fiscal responsibility. One of the main 04/11/12 Page 2 DRAFT projects is reviewing the budget for the street maintenance plan. Overall, the Commission feels the City is in pretty good financial shape. Other activities included renewing the City's insurance agents and financial advisors. Some budget challenges include fluctuation of Local Government Aid, changes to the housing credit, and long-term capital planning. Stability and transparency is important to see how the dollars are spent. After the Commission reports, the floor was opened for questions. A comment was made that there seemed to be a lot of development, but not much development that would help keep teens busy. Mayor Willson responded that there are several initiatives underway to address teen time. One item is the Brooklyn Bridge Alliance for Youth (involving colleges, school districts, and Brooklyn Park) to combine efforts to address youth issues identified in the PERF Study. Rahn also mentioned the Brooklyn Center High School recreation center and trails were projects the Planning Commission reviewed that will provide activities for youth. A comment was made that we need to continue to look for ways to get the youth involved in constructive activities so they can be future consumers and positive citizens. Councilmember Lasman stated other police programs such as teen diversion programs, foot patrol, bike patrol, and truancy are also part of the solution. Mayor Willson commended the Commissions for their great work and research on issues. He added that he appreciates everyone's time. Councilmembers Kleven, Lasman, Myszkowski, and Ryan all expressed their appreciation for the time, skills, and commitment of the Commissioners, staff liaisons, and staff. The coordination among City departments has improved over the past few years,improving problem solving. City Manager Curt Boganey referred to the handout and highlighted some modifications to the City's mission statement, values statements, and goals as follows: the words "inclusive" and "for all people" were added to the City's mission statement; an inclusion value statement was added; the City Goal ##4 of improving the image has moved higher in priority as a strategic goal; and the City Goal 46 was changed to include "engagement of all segments". Also, roles and responsibilities were developed for the commissions, commission members, and commission chairs similar to the ones established for the Council and staff. Mayor Willson thanked the Chairs for their presentations and everyone for attending. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Kay Lasman and seconded by Dan Ryan to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Willson at 8:04 p.m. 04/11/12 Page 3 DRAFT i City Council Agenda Item X10. 6b i I COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 17, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Maria Rosenbaum, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Licenses for City Council Approval Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the following licenses at its April 23, 2012. Background: The following businesses/persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each business/person has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Applicants for rental dwelling licenses are in compliance with Chapter 12 of the City Code of Ordinances, unless comments are noted below the property address on the attached rental report. MECHANICAL Aairgate Htg&A/C, Inc. P.O.Box 1649,Maple Grove Dietrich Mechanical 4353 Sequoia Drive,Eagan GTS HVAC,Inc. 4018 Joyce Lane, Brooklyn Center Gilbert Mechanical 4451 W 76"'Street, Edina Glowing Hearth&Home 100 Eldorado Drive, Jordan J Berd Mechanical Contractors,Inc. 3308 Southway Drive, St. Cloud Louis DeGidio Services, Inc. 21033 Heron Way,Lakeville Midwest Maintenance&Mechanical 710 Pennsylvania Avenue S, Golden Valley Northern Heating&A/C,Inc. 9431 Alpine Drive NW, Ramsey RC Heating&A/C 4880 McAllister Avenue NE, St. Michael Solid Refrigeration LLC 1125 American Blvd E,Bloomington South Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 21005 Langford Avenue,Jordan Westair Corporation 11184 River Road NE, Hanover MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIP Boulevard Auto Sales,Inc. 6121 Brooklyn Blvd PUBLIC DANCE Brooklyn Center Investments Group Inc. 2101 Freeway Blvd RENTAL See attached report. SIGN HANGER Signation Sign Group 6840 Shingle Creek Pkwy Spectrum Sign Systems,Inc. 9278 Isanti Street NE, Blaine TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCT Family Dollar 2105 57`x'Ave N 6211 Brooklyn Blvd Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inchcsive conununify that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Rental License Category Criteria Policy— Adopted by City Council 03-08-10 Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria I License Category Number of Units Property Code Violations per (Based on Property Inspected Unit Code Only) Type I— 3 Year 1-2 units 0-1 3+units` `0-0.75 Type II—2 Year 1=2 units Greater than 1 but not more than 4 3±;units Greater than 0.75 but not more han 15 Type III— 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 4 but not more than 8 3+units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Type IV—6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 8 3+units Greater than 3 License Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Category Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category 1-2 0-1 Impact 3-4 units 0=0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 Category 34 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 1-2 Greater than 3 Categories 3-4_units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive conurumitt%that enhances the gitality of life for all people antipreserves the public trust Rental Licenses for Cou,inc�IsA r'oal o1n April 23 2U12' pE?. , Property Final Previous Dwelling. Renewal Code . License Police License License .Pro pertyAd dress,-,` Type or Initial Ovvner Violations Type CFS* Type** Type"*** 4810 63rd Ave N Passed w/Weather Deferral Single Family Renewal Paul Miller 4 II 0 11 N/T 1304 68th Ln N Single Family Renewal Samuel Holloway II 5 III 1 III N/T 5348 70th Cir Single Family Renewal Deepak Nath 0 II 0 II N/T 5160 Drew Ave N Passed w/Weather Deferral Single Family Renewal Chen Zhou 1 1 0 1 111 4707 Eleanor La Single Family:-` Renewal Todd Vlasaty 0 1 0 1 III 5637 Emerson Ave N Single Family Renewal Douglas Pederson 0 1 0 1 111 5325 Humboldt Ave N Passed w/Weather Deferral Single Family Renewal Linda Mitchell 4 11 0 11 N/T Moeen Ahmad Masood/ 6753 Humboldt Ave N Single Family Renewal Shehla Alavi 4 II 0 11 IV Moeen Ahmad Masood/ 6765 Humboldt Ave N Single Family Renewal Shehla Alavi 5 III 0 III IV 6813 Humboldt Ave N B304 Single Family Renewal Raymond Charest 4 11 0 II III 5617 Logan Ave N Single Family Renewal Darwin and Marcia Kulzer 4 II 0 111 III 6819 Orchard Ave N Single Family Renewal Lue Moua 0 1 0 1 II 6437 Scott Ave N Single Family Renewal Greg Gervlis 0 1 0 I 111 6937 Unity Ave N Single Family lRenewal Wells Bovard j 0 1 3 11 IV 7169 Unity Ave N ISingle Family Renewal Angelique Brown 1 2 II 1 0 II N/T *CFS=Calls For Service for Renewal Licenses Only(Initial Licenses are not applicable to calls for service and will be listed N/A.) ** Final License Type ***Initial licenses will not show a previous license type; N/T indicates No Type since it was under the previous 2-year rental license program All properties are current on utilities and property taxes Type 1=3 year Type II =2 year Type III=1 year i City Council Agenda Item No. 6c � COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 17, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer �'� SUBJECT: Resolution Supporting the City of Brooklyn Center's Minnesota Safe Routes to School Planning Assistance Grant Application Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of a resolution supporting the City of Brooklyn Center's Minnesota Safe Routes to School planning assistance grant application. Background: In early 2009, several traffic safety issues where identified along Dupont Avenue in the area of the Evergreen Elementary school pertaining to school zones, school speed zones and crosswalks. Although this issue was mitigated by implementing a new 20 mile per hour school speed zone and speed enforcement, it brought to light other citywide school zone issues and inconsistencies. In response, City staff performed an initial review and inventory of the school zones throughout the City. Upon review of these findings, the City's Administrative Traffic Committee determined that a larger, more significant evaluation is needed that could include significant revisions to school zone traffic control throughout the City (e.g. crosswalks, pavement markings, signing, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)compliance issues, etc). With the anticipation of future federal funding opportunities to address these types of citywide school zone issues under the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program, it was planned to be studied and addressed through those means. However, due to federal funding cuts and delays in reauthorizing the funding under the SRTS program, there have been no available grants to apply for until now. On March 19, 2012, the Minnesota Department of Transportation issued a solicitation for grant applications for SRTS planning assistance and non-infrastructure implementation grants In line with the City's plan, City staff is currently completing a grant application under the planning assistance portion of the SRTS grant program, which is due at noon on Friday, April 27, 2012. The City's proposed planning efforts being requested under the grant include the following elements: • Evaluating and preparing school walk/bike route plan maps • Evaluating existing traffic controls for school areas (crosswalks, school zones, speed zones, local issues, etc.) and identifying needed improvements and solutions • Developing an implementation plan for identified and needed infrastructure improvements, educational elements and enforcement elements Budget Issues: As part of the planning efforts that will fall under this grant if awarded, it is anticipated that the City's contribution will include staff support time from multiple departments including Public .Mission;Ensuring an attractive,clean,sr fe,inclusive coninrunitj.,that enhances the rlualig,of life for all people mud preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Works, Police and Business and Development. Future implementation plan strategies would include the needed future budgeting to carry out the recommended infrastructure improvements and other educational and enforcement efforts. Council Goals: Strategic: 3. We will ensure a safe and secure community 7. We will continue to maintain the city's infrastructure improvements Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,saff e,inehrsive community that enhances the quatio,of life for alt people and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER'S MINNESOTA SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLANNING ASSISTANCE GRANT APPLICATION WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation is soliciting statewide grant applications under the federally funded Safe Routes to School program to increase opportunities for children to walk and bicycle to school safely; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is served by four independent school districts including Osseo Area Schools District 279, Robbinsdale Area Schools District 281, Brooklyn Center Community Schools District 286 and Anoka-Hennepin School District 11 that provide eleven different K-8 schools including two private schools; and WHEREAS, the common thread to the multiple school districts and numerous schools is the City of Brooklyn Center, which is also the jurisdictional authority for the majority of the public roadways and trail/sidewalk systems that serve these schools; and WHEREAS, in an effort to collectively assess the City's transportation system to ensure uniformity, safety and adequacy for all users including bikers, walkers and vehicles in the areas that serve the City's schools,the City is requesting said grant to conduct the necessary planning that is needed to identify any deficiencies and the needed enhancements and other opportunities that will promote safety and increase the use of the City's trails and sidewalks by students; and WHEREAS, this proposed planning effort is supported by the City's Comprehensive Plan and the City's Mission, Values and Goals that include: We will ensure a safe and secure community;We will maintain and improve City infrastructure where the traveling public will benefit from multi-modal transportation options fostered and provided by the City;and we will improve the image of the City with citizens and others where citizens and others throughout the State will recognize Brooklyn Center as a safe, quality, and attractive community in which to live, work and play. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Council support the City's Safe Routes to School Planning Assistance Grant Application with the ultimate goal to increase opportunities for children to walk and bicycle to school safely. RESOLUTION NO. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Council support designating and committing the means necessary to ensure the planning process leads to a completed Safe Routes to School Plan for the entire City. April 23, 2012 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item No. 6d COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 17, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer j b SUBJECT: Resolution Amending Funding Sources, Improvement Project No. 2010-16, Contract 2010-I, Shingle Creek Restoration Improvements Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the resolution amending funding sources, Improvement Project No. 2010-16, Contract 2010-I, Shingle Creek Restoration Improvements. Background: On December 12, 2011, the City Council accepted work performed and authorized final payment for Improvement Project No. 2010-16 Shingle Creek Restoration Improvements. Final payment was then issued to the contractor. Prior and subsequent to these actions, City staff worked with the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission's engineer to confirm expected funding amounts in accordance with the agreement between the City and the Watershed. On November 23, 2011, the final expenditures and revenue summary was sent by the City to the Watershed engineer, which amounts were subsequently confirmed by the Watershed's engineer, specifically the Watershed's share in the amount of$127,500 as designated in the agreement. On January 12, 2012,unbeknownst to the City, the final Watershed funding amount was reduced to $85,406.59. Upon realization by the City of this reduced funding amount, City staff made an inquiry to the Watershed Commission for the basis of this change. The Watershed indicated that their rule for funding is to fund a maximum of 25% of the final construction amount (not based on the original estimated amount). Due to the reduced actual final project costs ($344,655.08) compared to the originally estimated project costs ($520,000), the Watershed's share was proportionally reduced from $127,500 to $85,406.59 less minimal Watershed expenses. At the April 12, 2012, Watershed meeting, Commissioners were asked by the City to reconsider and fund the originally committed amount based on the fact that the terms of the agreement indicated the funding amount to be $127,500 with no mention of the final amount being reduced and based on 25% of the final construction amount. The Watershed indicated that this has been the practice, even though it is not written into any agreement nor is indicated in any other policy or plan of the Watershed's. Budget Issues: The originally committed amount for the City's portion for funding of the project based on the original project estimation was $264,263 and was to be funded out of Tax Increment Financing District(TIF) 2. Upon completion of the project and based on the assumption of obtaining the full $127,500 from the Watershed, the City's funding portion was reduced to $96,418.15. However, due to the reduction in funding from the Watershed, the City's portion has now been increased by $42,093.41 to a total of$138,511.56 (see table in resolution). This increased amount is recommended to be funded out of TIF 2 as originally programmed. Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive conrmunity that enhances the duality of life fior all people and preserves the public trust i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM i Council Goals: Strategic: 8. We will encourage citywide environmental sustainability efforts Ongoing: 5. We will ensure the City drinking water is high quality and that the storm water is properly managed Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quali(v of life fi)r all people anti preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING FUNDING SOURCES, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2010-16, CONTRACT 2010-1, SHINGLE CREEK RESTORATION IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS,on December 12,2011,the City of Brooklyn Center previously considered the finalization of said project and designation of final funding sources and amounts for Improvement Project No. 2010-16, Contract 2010-1, Shingle Creek Restoration Improvements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to a written funding agreement between the City of Brooklyn Center and the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Organization for said project,the Watershed has reduced its expected funding participation based on the Watershed's past practice of funding 25%of the project based on final construction costs. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota,that the final project revenues are hereby amended as follows: COSTS Original Estimate Final 12/12/11 Amended Contract $386,000.00 $236,188.19 $236,188.19 Change Order Nos. 1 &2 $ 23,365.50 $ 23,365.50 Subtotal Contract $386,000.00 $259,553.69 $259,553.69 Admin/Legal/Engr. $ 785000.00 $ 85,111.39 $ 85,111.39 Contingency $ 56,000.00 Total Project Cost $520,000.00 $344,665.08 $344,665.08 REVENUES As Original Award As Final Amended Shingle Creek $127,500.00 $127,500.00 $ 85,406.59 Watershed Commission Clean Water Legacy Grant $1 05,237.00 $105,237.00 $105,237.00 Hennepin County (4.5%) $ 23,000.00 $ 15,509.93 $ 15,509.93 City of Brooklyn Center $264,263.00 $ 96,418.15 $138,511.56 (TIF 2) Total Revenue $520,000.00 $344,665.08 $344,665.08 April 23, 2012 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item No. 6e i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 17, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Site Lease Agreement with Zayo Group, LLC Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of a resolution authorizing execution of a Site Lease Agreement with Zayo Group, LLC. Background: Zayo Group, LLC has submitted an application to the City to install a fiber optic line and ground equipment adjacent to water tower No. 2 (Evergreen Park area). This fiber optic service provider plans to provide fiber optic service to T-Mobile's site/antennas located adjacent to water tower No. 2 and possibly other providers in the future. Over the past year, Zayo (and its affiliates) have installed a significant amount of underground fiber optic cable in Brooklyn Center that will accommodate service needs at this lease site. Zayo currently has cable located from the north to south ends of Brooklyn Center generally along France Avenue, Xerxes Avenue, Brooklyn Boulevard and Drew Avenue, and an east/west route along Single Creek Parkway and 69th Avenues. City staff has finalized its review of the tenant's preliminary construction plans and have found the plans to be acceptable. The attached site lease agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney and City Engineer. Zayo Group, LLC will be issued a permit once staff approves the final construction plans and the Site Lease Agreement is executed. Budget Issues: The application was submitted along with the required $2,000 application fee. The Water Utility Fund will receive an annual fee in accordance with the site lease agreement amounting to $8,000, as established for 2012. Council Goals: Strategic: 7. We will continue to maintain the city's infrastructure improvements Ongoing: 1. We will provide streamlined, cost effective, quality services with limited resources Hission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,site,inclusive conimunit*v that enhances the qualiti,of life for all people and preserves the public trust i Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SITE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH ZAYO GROUP, LLC WHEREAS, Zayo Group, LLC has submitted to the City a request to lease ground space adjacent to City water tower number two,along with the required$2,000 application fee;and WHEREAS, as compensation for the use of City property,Zayo Group,LLC agrees to pay an annual lease payment of$8,000.00. The payment will be prorated for the first year then annually increased by a minimum of 5 percent for twenty years represented by one five-year lease period with three five-year renewals; and WHEREAS,the City and Zayo Group,LLC have negotiated a lease agreement that is consistent with the City's Policy Regarding Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota,that. 1. The lease agreement between Zayo Group, LLC and the City of Brooklyn Center for use of the grounds adjacent to water tower number two is hereby approved. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute said lease agreement. 2. All lease payments collected from said lease will be deposited into the Water Utility Fund. April 23, 2012 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Leased Premises 2. Rent (a)Amount. Adjustments (b) Time of Payment, Taxes 3. Governmental Approval Contingency (a)Tenant Application (b)Engineering StudX (c)Non-approval 4. Term and Renewals 5. Tenant's Use. (a)User Priority (b) Purposes (c) Construction (d) Operation (e) Maintenance, Improvement Expenses (f)Replacements (g) Drawings (h)No Interference (i)Access (j) Payment of Utilities 6. Additional maintenance Expenses 7. Defense and Indemnification (a) General (b) Hazardous Materials (c)Tenant's Warranty 8. Insurance (a) Workers' Compensation (b) General Liability. (c)Automobile Liability (d) Tenant Property Insurance (e) Hazardous Materials Coverage (D Adjustment to Insurance Coverage Limits (g) Additional Insured - Certificate of Insurance 9. Damage or Destruction 10. Lease Termination (a)Events of Termination (b)Notice of Termination (c)Tenant's Liability for Early Termination (d) Site Restoration 11. Limitation of Landlord's Liability 12. Temporary Interruptions of Service 13. Tenant Interference (a) With Structure (b) With Higher Priority Users (c) Interference Study-New Occupants (d) Interference -New Occupants 14. Assignment 15. Condemnation 16. Disputes 17. Enforcement and Attorneys' Fees 18. Notices 19. Authority 20. Binding Effect 21. Complete Lease; Amendments 22. Governing Law 23. Severability 24. Memorandum 25. Waiver of Landlord's Lien 26. Warranty of Title and Quiet Enioyment I III SITE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS SITE LEASE AGREEMENT ("Lease"), made this 23rd day of April, 2012, between the City of Brooklyn Center, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation ("Landlord"), and Zayo Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Tenant"). For good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 1. Leased Premises. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease, Landlord hereby leases to Tenant and Tenant leases from Landlord a portion of Landlord's property ("Property"), located at 6900 Dupont Ave. N., City of Brooklyn Center, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto,subject to any and all existing easements,as more particularly shown in Exhibit B attached hereto, on which directional cables and appurtenances will be attached and located, the exact location of each to be reasonably approved by Landlord's City Engineer, together with appurtenant easements and access rights ("Leased Premises"). 2. Rent. (a) Amount, Adjustments. As consideration for this Lease, Tenant shall pay Landlord an annual rent in the amount of Eight Thousand dollars and Zero cents($8,000.00)for the initial year, which shall be increased each year on January 1,by the greater of: (a)five percent(5%) of the previous year's annualized rent, or by an amount equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"). The CPI shall mean the "Consumer Price Index" for All Urban Consumers,All Cities,All Items(1967= 100)as published by the United States Department of Labor Statistics, or if such index shall be discontinued,the successor index,or if there shall be no successor index, such comparable index as mutually agreed upon by the parties. To determine the annual rent increase to be paid by Tenant under a CPI adjuster,the annualized rental for the previous year shall be multiplied by a percentage figure, computed from a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the CPI for the third quarter of the preceding year and the denominator of which shall be the CPI for the corresponding quarter of one year earlier. Such fraction shall be converted to a percentage equivalent.The resulting percentage fixture shall be multiplied by the previous year's rent (annualized for the first year). (b)Time of Payment Taxes. Landlord shall communicate all rental increases to the Tenant in writing by the preceding December 1 of each year. The annual rental shall be paid before January 1 of each year. For the first year,the rental shall be pro -rated through December 31 and shall be paid to Landlord in full at the time Lease is executed. If the Tenant does not meet the requirements referenced in Subparagraph 3(a) below within thirty (30) days of final execution of this Lease, Landlord shall refund the tenant rental payment made at the time of Lease execution and this Lease shall terminate.Landlord agrees to notify Tenant of any taxes or other charges imposed upon the property by a governmental agency. In addition to the annual rental, Tenant agrees to timely pay its pro rata share of any taxes or other charges imposed upon the property by a governmental agency required as a result of this Lease and all April 2012 Page 1 City of Brooklyn Center Lease Agreement other payments required herein. 3. Governmental Approval Continency. (a) Tenant Application. Tenant's right to use the Leased Premises is expressly made contingent upon its obtaining all the certificates,permits,zoning and other approvals that may be required by any federal, state, or local authority.This shall include the engineering studies specified in Subparagraph 3(b) below on the Structure to be conducted at Tenant's expense. Landlord shall cooperate with Tenant in its efforts to obtain and retain such approvals. (b) Engineering Studies. Before obtaining a building permit, Tenant must submit a study or studies that shall address,but not be limited to the following: (i) an interference study carried out by an independent and qualified professional approved by the Landlord showing that Tenant's intended use will not interfere with any existing communications facilities and(ii)a study showing that the presence of the Tenant's Facilities, as defined in Subparagraph 5 (b), will not prejudice the use of the Water Tower Structure or grounds, inhibit the Landlord's operation and maintenance of the facility and its appurtenances, inhibit access,nor damage the Water Tower Structure,or its appurtenant facilities.If Landlord concludes after review of the study that there is a potential for interference that cannot be reasonably remedied, or for prejudice to the Water Tower Structure or its use, Landlord may terminate this Lease immediately and refund the initial rental to Tenant.The Landlord,at the sole discretion ofthe Landlord, may hire an independent consultant to review the engineering study or studies,as defined in Subparagraph 5 (b),construction drawings and plans for structural and practical considerations, and to inspect and monitor all construction and installation work for quality assurance and quality control. The Tenant must pay all associated costs of such independent consultants prior to obtaining a building permit. (c)Non-approval. In the event that any application necessary under Subparagraph 3(a)above is finally rejected or any certificate,permit, license, or approval issued to Tenant is canceled, expires, lapses, or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated by governmental authority so that Tenant will be unable to use the Leased Premises for its intended purposes,Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease and be reimbursed pro rata based on the effective date of the termination, for the annual rental payment if made pursuant to Subparagraph 2(b) above. Notice of Tenant's exercise of its right to terminate shall be given to Landlord in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall be effective upon receipt of such notice by Landlord as evidenced by the return receipt, and receipt by the Landlord of the performance bond, irrevocable letter of credit, or other security required by paragraph 11 (d). Upon such termination, this Lease shall become null and void and the parties shall have no further obligations to each other except for obligations for payments of money incurred prior to the effective date of termination and except for any other obligations which,by the terms of this lease, are to survive termination. April 2012 Page 2 i City qfBrooklyn Center Lease Agreement 4. Term and Renewals. The "Initial Term" of this lease shall commence on the date in the first paragraph of this Lease("Effective Date",) and end on December 31 of the fifth calendar year of the Lease including any first partial year. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease, Tenant shall have the right to extend this Lease for three (3) additional five (5) year renewal periods ("Renewal Term") commencing on January 1 following the expiration date of the Initial Term or of any subsequent Renewal Term. This Lease shall be automatically renewed for each successive Renewal Term unless Tenant sends written notice of non-renewal to Landlord no later than ninety(90) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any Renewal Term, such notice provided in accordance with Paragraph 19 of this Lease. 5. Tenant's Use. (a)User Priority.Tenant agrees that the following priorities of use, in descending order,shall apply in the event of communication interference or other conflict while this Lease is in effect, and Tenant's use shall be subordinate accordingly: 1. Landlord; 2. Public safety agencies, including law enforcement, fire, and ambulance services, that are not part of the Landlord; 3. Other governmental agencies where use is not related to public safety; and 4. Tenant and other Government-regulated entities whose antennae offer a service to the general public for a fee, in a manner similar to a public utility, such as long distance and cellular telephone, not including radio or television broadcasters. (b) Purposes. Tenant shall use the Leased Premises only for the purpose of installing, maintaining, and operating a communications facility, equipment, cabinets or accessory building and uses incidental thereto for providing radio and wireless telecommunication services which Tenant is legally authorized to provide to the public. Tenant's use of the Leased Premises shall at all times be in compliance with those construction drawings attached hereto as Exhibit B, the approval of which is hereby acknowledged. Tenant's use of the Leased Premises shall be non-exclusive, and Landlord specifically reserves the right to allow the Property to be used by other parties and to make additions,deletions,or modifications to its own facilities on the Property. Tenant's communication facility shall consist of cables and appurtenances connected to an accessory building or cabinet located on the Leased Premises ("Tenant Facilities"). As used in this agreement,the terms"accessory building"or"building" shall mean the fenced in compound or cabinets as shown in the drawings attached as Exhibit B. Landlord and Tenant shall comply with all applicable ordinances,statutes and regulations of local, state and federal government agencies. April 2012 Page 3 i City of Brooklyn Center Lease Agreement (c) Construction. Tenant may erect and operate a fiber optic facility consisting of an "accessory building" or cabinets in accordance with its approved construction drawings attached as Exhibit B and those construction drawings attached as Exhibit B. Tenant may not increase the number of fiber runs without first securing the approval of Landlord by written amendment to this Lease. (d) Operation. Tenant shall have the right, at its sole cost and expense, to operate and maintain the Tenant Facilities on the Leased Premises in accordance with good engineering practices and with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations. Any damage done to the Leased Premises or other Landlord property including the Water Tower Structure during installation or during operations, shall be repaired at Tenant's expense,said repairs to be undertaken immediately in the event the damage endangers the safe operation of the water tower, or within thirty(3 0)days in the event the damage does not endanger the safe operation of the water tower. If the Tenant fails to undertake or complete these repairs,the Landlord may repair the damage and charge the Tenant for all costs associated with the repair. The Tenant Facilities shall remain the exclusive property of the Tenant. (e) Maintenance. Improvement Expenses. All modifications to the Leased Premises and the Tenant Facilities shall be at the Tenant's expense and such improvements, including facilities and equipment, shall be maintained in a good state of repair, at least equal to the standard of maintenance of the Landlord's facilities on or adjacent to the Leased Premises, and kept secured by Tenant. The Tenant agrees to clean and/or repair any damage done to the Tenant Facilities due to vandalism within three(3)days of notification of such damage. Furthermore, the Tenant agrees to pay all costs associated with said cleaning,normal maintenance,grounds maintenance or repair made to the Leased Premises. If repair,cleaning or maintenance is not commenced within three(3)days notification,the Landlord may perform the necessary work and charge the Tenant for all costs associated with the work. (f) Replacements. Before the Tenant may update, modify, or replace the Tenant Facilities other than as provided for in the construction drawings attached as Exhibit B, Tenant shall request the approval of the Landlord and provide detailed plans and specifications to Landlord. Tenant shall submit to Landlord such detailed plans and specifications for any such replacement facilities together with any other information reasonably requested by Landlord regarding such update,modification, or replacement;including but not limited to a technical study, all of which will be carried out at Tenant's expense including an additional administration fee as deemed appropriate by the Landlord to cover all expenses. Landlord may not unreasonably withhold approval. (g) Drawings. Tenant shall provide Landlord with as-built drawings of the equipment and improvements installed on the Leased Premises,which show the actual location of all Tenant Facilities. Tenant shall not be required to list the equipment located within Tenant's building with the exception of any item which may be considered Hazardous Material as defined in April 2012 Page 4 City of Brooklyn Center Lease Agreement paragraph 8(b) of this Lease. (h)No Interference. Tenant shall,at its own expense,maintain any equipment on or attached to the Leased Premises in a safe condition, in good repair and in a manner suitable to Landlord so as not to conflict with the use of the surrounding premises by Landlord. Tenant shall not unreasonably interfere with the operations of any prior tenant using the Site or Structure and shall not interfere with the working use of the water storage facilities thereon or to be placed thereon by Landlord. (i) Access. Tenant,at all times during this Lease,shall have access to the Leased Premises in, order to install, operate, and maintain its Tenant Facilities. Such access to the Leased Premises shall be coordinated with Landlord so as not to interfere with Landlord's maintenance or other activities. (j) Payment of Utilities. Tenant shall separately meter charges for the consumption of electricity and other utilities associated with its use of the Leased Premises and shall promptly pay all costs associated therewith. 6. Additional Maintenance Expenses. Upon notice from Landlord, Tenant shall promptly pay to Landlord all additional Landlord expenses incurred in maintaining the Leased Premises that are caused by Tenant's occupancy of the Leased Premises. Tenant acknowledges the need for periodic maintenance of the Water Tower Structure, including repair of the Structure and its coatings. Tenant must remove Tenant's Facilities at Tenant's cost, upon reasonable notice to allow maintenance, repair, repainting, restoration or other activity as determined and required by Landlord. Landlord will not be responsible for scheduled interruptions in use of the Tenant's Facilities. Except in the case of an emergency, Landlord must provide Tenant thirty (30) days notice of commencement of maintenance activities In case of an emergency, Landlord may remove Tenant's Facilities, at the Tenant's expense, and shall notify Tenant within a reasonable time. An"emergency" shall be deemed to exist in those situations which constitute an immediate threat to the health or safety of the public or immediate danger to the Landlords facilities or property. In the event the use of the Tenant's Facilities are interrupted, Tenant may provide and maintain mobile sites on wheels on the Property only after such temporary facilities have been approved by Landlord, on land owned or controlled by Landlord in the immediate area of the Property. Tenant is responsible for any cost associated with the protection of the Tenant Facilities during these periodic or emergency activities. Tenant further agrees that the Landlord is not responsible for transmission lines during routine maintenance. Tenant may, at Tenant's own expense, test said lines before and after maintenance. April 2012 Page 5 City ojBrooklyn Center Lease Agreement 7. Defense and Indemnification. (a) General. Tenant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Landlord and its elected officials,officers,employees,agents, and representatives,from and against any and all claims, costs, losses,expenses,demands,actions,or causes of action,including reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses of litigation,which may be asserted against or incurred by Landlord or for which Landlord may be liable in the performance of this Lease arising from Tenant's installation, maintenance,and operation of its Tenant Facilities or Tenants use ofthe Leased Premises, except those which arise solely from the negligence,willful misconduct,or other fault of Landlord or other user of the property. Tenant shall defend all claims arising out of the installation, operation, use, maintenance, repair, removal, or presence of Tenant Facilities,equipment and related facilities on the Leased Premises. Landlord agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Tenant harmless from any and all costs(including reasonable attorney's fees) and claims of liability or loss which arise out of Landlord's use of the Leased Premises, except those which arise from the negligence willful misconduct or other fault of Tenant. Landlord shall not be obligated to indemnify Tenant in any amount in excess of the limitations of liability set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466, less any amounts which Landlord is obligated to pay by reason of the liability of the Landlord, its officers,employees,and agents arising out of the same act or occurrence. (b) Hazardous Materials. Without limiting the scope of Subparagraph 10 (a) above,Tenant will be solely responsible for and will defend, indemnify, and hold Landlord, its agents, and employees harmless from and against any and all claims, costs, and liabilities, including attorney's fees and costs, arising out of or in connection with the cleanup or restoration ofthe Leased Premises resulting from the Tenant's use of Hazardous Materials. For purposes of this Lease, "Hazardous Materials" shall be interpreted broadly and specifically includes, without limitation, asbestos,fuel,batteries or any hazardous substance,waste,or materials as defined in any federal,state,or local environmental or safety law or regulations including,but not limited to, CERCLA.. Landlord represents that (1) that neither Landlord nor, to Landlord's knowledge, any third party has used, generated, stored or disposed of, or permitted the use, generation, storage or disposal of, any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within the Property in violation of any law or regulation,and(2)that Landlord will not, and will not permit any third party to use, generate, store or dispose of any Hazardous Material on, under, about or within the Property in violation of any law or regulation. (c) Tenant's Warranty. Tenant represents and warrants that its use of the Leased Premises will not generate and Tenant will not store or dispose of on the Leased Premises, nor transport to or over the Leased Premises, any Hazardous Materials in violation of any law or regulation governing the use,transport,or storage of Hazardous Materials. Tenant agrees to notify the Landlord in writing within 48 hours ofthe existence of Hazardous Materials on the Leased Premises. The obligation of this Paragraph 8 shall survive the expiration or other termination of this Lease. April 2012 Page 6 City of Brooklyn Center Lease Agreement 8. Insurance (a)Workers Compensation. The Tenant must maintain Workers'Compensation insurance in compliance with all applicable statutes. The policy shall also provide Employer's Liability coverage with limits of not less than$500,000 Bodily Injury each accident,$500,000 Bodily Injury by disease, policy limit, and $500,000 Bodily Injury by disease, each employee. (b) General Liability. The Tenant must maintain an occurrence form comprehensive general liability coverage. Such coverage shall include, but not be limited to, bodily injury,property damage — broad form, and personal injury, for the hazards of Premises/Operation, broad form contractual, independent contractors, and products/completed operations. The Tenant must maintain aforementioned comprehensive general liability coverage with limits of liability not less than $1,500,000 each occurrence; $1,500,000 personal and advertising injury; $2,000,000 general aggregate, and $2,000,000 products and completed operations aggregate. These limits may be satisfied by the comprehensive general liability coverage or in combination with an umbrella or excess liability policy, provided coverage afforded by the umbrella or excess policy are no less than the underlying comprehensive general liability coverages. Tenant will maintain Completed Operations coverage for a minimum of two years after the construction is completed. (c) Automobile Liability. The Tenant must carry Automobile Liability coverage. Coverage shall afford total liability limits for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability in the amount of$1,500,000 per accident.The liability limits may be afforded under the Commercial Policy, or in combination with an Umbrella or Excess Liability Policy provided coverage afforded by the Umbrella Excess Policy are no less than the underlying Commercial Auto Liability coverage. Coverage shall be provided for Bodily Injury and Property Damage for the ownership, use, maintenance or operation of all owned, non-owned and hired automobiles. The Commercial Automobile Policy shall include at least statutory personal injury protection, uninsured motorists and underinsured motorist's coverage. (d)Tenant Property Insurance.The Tenant must keep in force for the duration of the Lease a policy covering damages to Tenant Facilities at the Leased Premises.The amount of coverage shall be sufficient to replace the damaged property, loss of use and comply with any ordinance or law requirements. April 2012 Page 7 i City of Brooklyn Center Lease Agreement (e) Additional Insured - Certificate of Insurance. The Tenant shall provide, prior to tenancy, evidence of the required insurance in the form of a Certificate of Insurance issued by a company authorized to do business in the state of Minnesota, such insurance company to be reasonably acceptable to Landlord, which includes all coverages required in this paragraph 9. Tenant will name the Landlord as an Additional Insured on the General Liability and Commercial Automobile Liability Policies. The Certificate(s) shall also provide the coverage may not be canceled, non-renewed, or materially changed without thirty(30) days prior written notice to the Landlord. (f) Waiver of Claims; Subrogation. Each of Landlord and Tenant hereby releases the other from any and all liability or responsibility to the other or anyone claiming through or under it by way of subrogation or otherwise for any loss or damage that may occur to the Leased Premises or any improvements thereto, or the Structure or any improvements thereto, or any property of such party therein, by reason of fire or any other cause which could be insured against under the terms of standard fire and extended coverage(all-risk) insurance policies, regardless of cause or origin, including fault or negligence of the other party hereto, or anyone for whom such party may be responsible. Each party shall cause each insurance policy obtained by it to provide that the insurer waives all rights of recovery by way of subrogation against either party hereto in connection with damage covered by such policy. The releases in this section will be effective whether or not the loss was actually covered by insurance. Tenant assumes all risk of loss or damage of Tenant's property or leasehold improvements within the Leased Premises, including any loss or damage caused by water leakage, fire, windstorm, explosion, theft, act of any tenant, or other cause. Landlord will not be liable to Tenant, or its employees, for loss of or damage to any property in or at the Leased Premises or the Structure. (g) Adjustment to Insurance Coverage Limits. Liability coverage required by paragraphs 9(b) and (c) shall be increased as needed so that the coverage per occurrence is, at all times, the same or greater than the maximum liability for municipalities specified in Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.04 for any number of claims arising out of the same occurrence. 9. Damatze or Destruction. If the Leased Premises is destroyed or damaged, without contributory fault of the Tenant or its agents, so as, in Tenant's judgment, to hinder its effective use of the Tenant Facilities, Tenant may elect to terminate this Lease upon 30 days, written notice to Landlord. In the event Tenant elects to terminate the Lease, Tenant shall be entitled to a pro rata reimbursement of prepaid rent covering the period subsequent to the date of damage to or destruction of the Leased Premises. April 2012 Page 8 City of Brooklyn Center Lease Agreement 10. Lease Termination. (a)Events of Termination.Except as otherwise provided herein,this Lease may be terminated by either party upon sixty(60) days written notice to the other party as follows: (i) by either party upon a default of any covenant or term hereof by the other party, which default is not cured within sixty(60)days of receipt of written notice of default to the other party(without, however,limiting any other rights of the parties pursuant to any other provisions hereof); unless such default may not reasonably be cured within a sixty(60) day period in which case, this Lease may not be terminated if the defaulting party commences action to cure the default within such sixty (60) day period and proceeds with due diligence to fully cure the default,however,such period shall not, in any event, extend beyond one hundred twenty (120) days of receipt of written notice of default. (ii) by Tenant if it is unable to obtain or maintain any license, permit or other governmental approval necessary for the construction and/or operation of the Tenant Facilities or Tenant's business; (iii)by Tenant for cause immediately upon notice to Landlord if the Leased Premises is or becomes unacceptable for technology reasons, including, without limitation, unacceptable RF plan, shadowing,or interference,under the Tenant Facilities,design or engineering specifications or the systems to which the Tenant Facilities belong; (iv)by Landlord, upon one(1)year's written notice to Tenant, if its Council decides, for any reason, to redevelop the Leased Premises in a manner inconsistent with the continued use of the Leased Premises by Tenant and/or discontinue use of the Structure for all purposes; (v)by Landlord if it determines that the Structure is structurally unsound, including, but not limited to, consideration of age of the Structure, damage or destruction of all or part of the Structure on the Leased Premises from any source,or factors relating to condition of the Leased Premises; (vi) by Landlord if it determines that a potential user with a higher priority under Subparagraph 4(a) above cannot find another adequate location or the Landlord determines,after engineering studies,that the Tenant Facilities unreasonably interfere with another user with a higher priority, regardless of whether or not such interference was predicted in the initial interference study that was part of the application process, provided that the Landlord shall not at any time over the balance of the then existing Term and all unexpired Renewal Terms, lease the Leased Premises to another party with equal or lesser priority for the same use as that of the Tenant, April 2012 Page 9 i City of Brooklyn Center Lease Agreement unless such other party would not cause or contribute to the type of interference giving rise to the Tenant Facilities' interference with a higher priority. (b)Notice of Termination. The parties shall give notice of termination in writing by certified mail,return receipt requested. Such notice shall be effective upon receipt as evidenced by the return receipt, except notice of Tenants intention to terminate this lease shall be effective upon Landlords receipt of such notice and the cash deposit,performance bond,or irrevocable letter of credit as set forth in section I I (d)hereof. All rentals paid for the Lease prior to said termination date shall be retained by Landlord unless such termination is due to breach by Landlord. (c) Tenant's Liability for Early Termination. If Tenant terminates this Lease for any other reason other than as expressly provided in this Lease, Tenant shall pay to Landlord as liquidated damages for early termination, 150% of the annual rent for the year in which Tenant terminates, unless Tenant terminates during the last year of any Term under Paragraph 3 and Tenant has paid the annual rental for that year. (d) Site Restoration. In the event that this Lease is terminated or not renewed, Tenant shall immediately cease operation and use of the Tenant Facilities for communication purposes and shall have 60 days from the termination or expiration date to remove its Tenant Facilities,and related equipment from the Leased Premises, repair the site and restore the surface of the ground site. Upon notice of termination, Tenant shall deposit with Landlord in the form of cash,performance bond, irrevocable letter of credit, or other acceptable security the sum of $10,000, which shall be fully refunded to Tenant upon the timely removal of the Tenant Facilities and related equipment, the repair of the site and restoration to the reasonable satisfaction of the Landlord. In the event that the Tenant Facilities and related equipment are not removed, Tenant has notified the Landlord that the following is collateral agent for entities having an interest in the Tenant Facilities and related equipment because of financing arrangements: Collateral Agent: NONE If Landlord removes the Tenant Facilities or related equipment, Landlord must give written notice to the above entities at the addresses provided,informing them that Tenant Facilities or related property have been removed and will be deemed abandoned if not claimed and the storage fees and other reasonable costs paid within thirty(30) days. The obligations of this paragraph (d) shall survive the expiration or other termination of this Lease. April 2012 Page 10 i it it City of Brooklyn Center Lease Agreement 11.Limitation of Landlord's Liability.If Landlord terminates this Lease for any reason other than default by Tenant, or Landlord causes interruption of the business of Tenant or for any other Landlord breach of this Lease,Landlord's liability for damages to Tenant shall be limited to the actual and direct costs of equipment removal,relocation or repair and shall specifically exclude any recovery for value of the business of Tenant as a going concern, future expectation of profits, loss of business or profit or related damages to Tenant. 12. Temporary Interruptions of Service. If Landlord reasonably determines that continued operation of the Tenant Facilities would cause or contribute to an immediate threat to public health and/or safety (except for any issues associated with human exposure to radio frequency omissions, which is regulated by the federal government), Landlord may order Tenant to discontinue its operation.Tenant shall immediately comply with such an order. Service shall be discontinued only for the period that the immediate threat exists. If Landlord does not give prior notice to Tenant,Landlord shall notify Tenant as soon as possible after its action and give its reason for taking the action. Landlord shall not be liable to Tenant or any other party for any interruption in Tenant's service or interference with Tenant's operation of its Tenant Facilities, except as may be caused by the willful misconduct of the Landlord, its employees or agents and except if Landlord's determination is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have been negligent.If the discontinuance extends for a period greater than three days, either consecutively or cumulatively,Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease within its sole discretion for cause and without the payment of any damages. 13. Tenant Interference (a) With Structure. Tenant shall not interfere with Landlord's use of the Water Tower Structure and agrees to cease all such actions which unreasonably and materially interfere with Landlord's use thereof no later than three business days after receipt of written notice of the interference from Landlord. In the event that Tenant's cessation of action is material to Tenant's use of the Leased Premises and such cessation frustrates Tenant's use of the Leased Premises, within Tenant's sole discretion,Tenant shall have the immediate right to terminate this Lease for cause and without the payment of any damages. (b)With Higher Priority Users. If the Tenant Facilities cause impermissible interference with higher priority users as set forth under Subparagraph 5(a) above or with preexisting tenants, Tenant shall take all measures necessary to correct and eliminate the interference. If the interference cannot be eliminated within 48 hours after receiving Landlord's written notice of the interference, Tenant shall immediately cease operating its Tenant Facilities and shall not reactivate operation, except intermittent operation for the purpose of testing, until the interference has been eliminated.If the interference cannot be eliminated within 30 days after Tenant received Landlord's written notice,Landlord or Tenant may at its option terminate this Lease immediately for cause and without the payment of any damages. (c) Interference Study-New Occupants. Upon written notice by Landlord that it has a bona April 2012 Page I1 I i i City of Brooklyn Center Lease Agreement fide request from any other party to lease an area including or in close proximity to the Leased Premises area, Tenant agrees to provide Landlord, within sixty (60) days, the radio frequencies or type of telecommunication equipment currently in operation or to be operated in the future on the Leased Premises at the time of such request.Landlord may then have an independent,registered professional engineer of Landlord's choosing perform the necessary interference studies to determine if the new applicant's frequencies or facilities will cause harmful radio interference to Tenant. Landlord shall require the new applicant to pay for such interference studies. (d) Interference-New Occupants.Landlord agrees that it will not grant a future lease in the Leased Premises area to any party who is of equal or lower priority to Tenant, if such party's use is reasonably anticipated to interfere with Tenant's operation of its Tenant Facilities. Landlord agrees further that any future lease of the Leased Premises area will prohibit a user of equal or lower priority from interfering with the Tenant Facilities. Landlord agrees that it will require any subsequent occupants of the Leased Premises area of equal or lower priority to Tenant to provide Tenant these same assurances against interference.Landlord shall have the right to cause the elimination of any interference with the operations of Tenant caused by such subsequent occupants. If such interference is not eliminated,Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease or seek injunctive relief against the interfering occupant, at Tenant's expense. 14. Assignment and Subletting. Tenant may not assign, or otherwise transfer all or any part of its interest in this Agreement or in the Premises without the prior written consent of Landlord;provided, however,that Tenant may assign its interest to its parent company,any subsidiary or affiliate of it or its parent company or to any successor-in-interest or entity acquiring fifty-one percent(51%)or more of its stock or assets, subject to any financing entity's interest, if any, in this Lease as set forth in Paragraph 26 below. Landlord may assign this Agreement upon written notice to Tenant, subject to the assignee assuming all of Landlord's obligations herein, including but not limited to,those set forth in Paragraph 26 below.Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Lease,Tenant may assign,mortgage,pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer without consent its interest in this Lease to any financing entity, or agent on behalf of any financing entity to whom Tenant(i)has obligations for borrowed money or in respect of guaranties thereof,(ii) has obligations evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or similar instruments, or (iii) has obligations under or with respect to letters of credit, bankers acceptances and similar facilities or in respect of guaranties thereof. 15. Condemnation. In the event the whole of the Leased Premises is taken by eminent domain,this Lease shall terminate as of the date title to the Leased Premises vests in the condemning authority.In event a portion of the Leased Premises is taken by eminent domain,either party shall have the right to terminate this Lease as of said date of title transfer, by giving thirty (30) days'written notice to the other party. In the event of any taking under the power of eminent domain, Tenant shall not be entitled to any portion of the award paid for the taking and the Landlord shall receive full amount of such award. Tenant hereby expressly waives any right or claim to any portion thereof. Although all April 2012 Page 12 i City of Brooklyn Center Lease Agreement damages, whether awarded as compensation for diminution in value of the leasehold or to the fee of the Leased Premises,shall belong to Landlord, Tenant shall have the right to claim and recover from the condemning authority, but not from Landlord, such compensation as may be separately awarded or recoverable by Tenant for relocation benefits or assistance. 16.Disputes. Any claim,controversy or dispute arising out of this Lease not resolved within ten(10) days following notice of the dispute, shall be submitted first and promptly to mediation. Each party shall bear its own costs of mediation and shall share equally the common costs of mediation. If mediation does not result in settlement within forty-five(45) days after the matter was submitted to mediation, either party may pursue all available remedies in any court of competent jurisdiction. 17. Enforcement and Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Lease shall bring a claim in court to enforce any rights hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred as a result of such claim. 18. Notices. All notices hereunder must be in writing and shall be deemed validly given if sent by certified mail,return receipt requested,addressed as follows(or any other address that the party to be notified may have designated to the sender by like notice): If to Landlord, to: City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Attn: City Manager If to Tenant, to: Zayo Group, LLC Attn: General Counsel Address 400 Centennial Pkwy, Suite 200 Louisville, CO 80027 Telephone: 303-381-4677 Email: cyost @zayo.com 19. Authority. Each of the individuals executing this Lease on behalf of the Tenant or the Landlord represents to the other party that such individual is authorized to do so by requisite action of the party to this Lease. April 2012 Page 13 i City of Brooklyn Center Lease Agreement 20. Binding Effect. This Lease shall run with the Property. This Lease shall extend to and bind the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 21. Complete Lease; Amendments. This Lease constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties and supersedes all offers, negotiations, and other agreement of any kind. There are no representations or understandings of any kind not set forth herein. Any modification of or amendment to this Lease must be in writing and executed by both parties. 22. Governing Law. This Lease shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 23. Severability. If any term of this Lease is found be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Lease, which shall continue in full force and effect. 24. Memorandum. Upon request by either party, the parties agree to promptly execute and deliver a recordable Memorandum of this Lease in a form acceptable to both parties which may be recorded by the party requesting the Memorandum of Lease. 25. Waiver of Landlord's Lien. (a) Landlord waives any lien rights it may have concerning the Tenant Facilities which are deemed Tenant's personal property and not fixtures, and Tenant has the right to remove the same at any time without Landlord's consent. (b) Landlord acknowledges that Tenant has entered into a financing arrangement including promissory notes and financial and security agreements for the financing of the Tenant Facilities(the"Collateral")with a third party financing entity(and may in the future enter into additional financing arrangements with other financing entities). In connection therewith, Landlord (i) consents to the installation of the Collateral; (ii) disclaims any interest in the Collateral, as fixtures or otherwise; and (iii) agrees that the Collateral shall be exempt from execution,foreclosure,sale, levy, attachment, or distress for any Rent due or to become due and that such Collateral may be removed at any time without recourse to legal proceedings. 26. Warranty of Title and Quiet Enjoyment. Lessor warrants that: (i) Lessor owns the Property in fee simple and has rights of access thereto and the Property is free and clear of all liens, encumbrances and restrictions; (ii) Lessor has full right to make and perform this Agreement; and (iii) Lessor covenants and agrees with Lessee that upon Lessee paying the Rent and observing and performing all the terms, covenants and conditions on Lessee's'part to be observed and performed, Lessee may peacefully and quietly.enjoy the Premises. April 2 0/2 Page 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed their respective seals the clay and year first above written. LANDLORD: City of Brooklyn Center, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation By: Mayor By: City Manager Tax ID#: 41-6005011 STATE OF MINNESOTA CO UNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 201 Tim Willson, Mayor, and Curt Boganey, City Manager, respectively, of the City of Brooklyn Center, on behalf of the City. Notaq Public My commission expires: TENANT: ZAYO 4XRO ,LLC By: � Dater t �- Title: (ft Tax ID#: STATE OF COUNTY OF The regoi� instrument vas acknowleclged before m this �' " may of J4A- the 201 , by on behalf of th torpor ion. otary Pt is MyCQmmisslon Expires 08/24/2014 My commission expires: EXHIBIT A EASEMENT EXHIBIT (See Sheet 2 of 2 for Legal Descriptions) POINT"B" ASPHALT DRIVE EASEMENT _ - S88°39'58"W 164.00 O ' UE UE UE _ UE\ 3 uE UE _s EUE �. j I 10' UTILITY 5' UTILITY in Cc) 00 LO EASEMENT EASEMENT Zo 2 ° O Y CL E ^` CD T-MOBILE I v\ �..� LEASE ,> ° M ZAYO 6'x6' AREA L z LEASE AREA SEE DETAIL 33 - ' WATER YJ 1.�I_I' ♦!\I ' TOWER t*- CD CD o N89°49'04"E o N ( I f o r to 6.00 I W �Iz ,z c; I ZAYO LEASE I° r W I i' b I m AREA o I o Er) Q (SOUTH LINE OF N89°59'43"W o I I U W THE SW 1/4 _ i� 1130.57 z I 6.00 Le�_�_ 2_50 2.50J S89°49'04"W SE COR. OF THE SW 1/4 POINT"A" P.O.B. C/L 5' SEC. 25,T.119 N., R.21 W. P.O.B. LEASE TRACT EASEMENT FOUND C.I.M. DETAIL SCALE: 1"=5' LEGEND w:, E o Denotes Chain Link Fence s� Fo Denotes Fiber Optic uE Denotes Underground Electric W Denotes Water Main 0 15 30 0PP Denotes Power Pole SCALE IN FEET o EM Denotes Electric Meter Easement Exhibit Project No. 12.00502 Sioux Falls-Bismarck-Denver-Detroit lakes-Fargo-Minneapolis A 100755A Date: 04/16/2012 5201 E.River Road,Suite 308 MC Minneapolis,MN 55421-1027 Drawn: !� Phone: 763.571,2500 Fax: 763.571,1168 Web: www.ulteig.com 1000 69th Avenue North Approved: MC Brooklyn Center, MN Sheets: 11 of 2 I EASEMENT EXHIBIT _Description of Parent Parcel: That part of Lot 50, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 309, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 50;thence East, a distance of 33 feet;thence South,a distance of 528.5 feet; thence East, a distance of 98.1 feet;thence South, a distance of 101.5 feet;thence East to a point distant 30 feet west of the east line of said Lot 50;thence North, a distance of 378.65 feet;thence northwesterly along a curve having a radius 757.33 feet to the north line of said Lot 50;thence East to the northeast corner of said Lot 50; thence South to the northwest corner of Outlot A, EVERGREEN ESTATES;thence South to the southwest corner of said Outlot A;thence Southwesterly along the westerly line of 70th Avenue North to the southwest corner of said EVERGREEN ESTATES;thence easterly along the south line of said EVERGREEN ESTATES to the east line of said Lot 50;thence South to the southeast corner of said Lot 50;thence West to the southwest corner of said Lot 50; thence North to the point of beginning. Description of Lease Tract: A lease tract for telecommunication purposes over, under and across the herein before described property, described as follows: Commencing the southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25,Township 119 North,Range 21 West, Hennepin County Minnesota;thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 43 seconds West,assumed bearing,along the south line of said Southwest Quarter, a distance of 1130.57 feet;thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 17 seconds East a distance of 215.14 to a point hereinafter referred to as Point"A", said point being the point of beginning of the lease tract to be described;thence South 89 degrees 49 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 6.00 feet;thence North 00 degrees 10 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 6.00 feet;thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 6.00 feet;thence South 00 degrees 10 minutes 56 seconds East a distance of 6.00 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 36 square feet more or less. Description of Utility Easement: An easement for utility purposes, 5.00 feet in width over, under and across the herein before described property, 2.50 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at the herein before described Point"A"; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 04 seconds East a distance of 2.50 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described;thence North 00 degrees 10 minutes 56 seconds West a distance of 32.69 feet;thence North 56 degrees 44 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 13.61 feet; thence North 01 degree 16 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 31.58 feet to the terminus of said centerline and the point of beginning of a centerline of an easement for utility purposes, 10.00 feet in width, being 5.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline;thence South 89 degrees 39 minutes 58 seconds West a distance of 164.00 feet to the east right of way line of Dupont Avenue North and said centerline there terminating. It is intended for the sideline of said easement be shortened or lengthened to intersect said right of way line. Contains 2,029 square feet more or less. I hereby certify that this survey, plan,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Micha I E. Ca on Lic. No.40035 Date: 1� Easement Exhibit Project No. 12.00502 Sioux Falls-Bismarck-Denver-Detroit takes-Fargo-Minneapolis A 100755A Date: 04.11612012 5201 E,River Road,Suite 308 Drawn: MC Minneapolis,MN 55421-1027 !� Phone: 763.571.2500 Fax: 763.571.1168 1000 69th Avenue North Approved: MC Web: www.ulteig.com -- Brooklyn Center, MN Sheets: 2 of 2 i I EXHIBIT B compass consultants inc. The New CC 10006 9T AVENUE NORTH A100755A ZAYO UTILITY PROJECT BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA FOR ZayO Bandwidth 400 Centennial Pkwy, Ste 200 Louisville, CO 80027 Certification I hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date Registration No.47597" 150 2nd St.SW Perham, MN 56573 1 218.346.3600 I www.trustcompass.com . 1000 69th Avenue North e A100755A ..Zayo Project ti 1000 69th Avenue North Brooklyn C niter,1l�nnesota 1, A100755A 3. Zayo Utility Project a Brooklyn Center, Minnesota BANDWITHY� ' 400 CENTENNIAL Pl ,STE.200 y LOUISVILLE,CO 80027 rt' �rI ,41r 'PROJECT . • . I ;' 1�f :n This project proposes to set equipment cabinets and construct underground conduits for Plan Date:March 26th,2012 a v data/communications at 1000 69th Avenue North in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. Mo • t LATITUDE: 45.08051389 LONGITUDE: —93.2945 d "" SHEET I TITLE RELEASE DATE REVISION DATE TITLE SHEET 10-12-10 3-26-12 C-2 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 10-12-10 — r STREET MAP C-3 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 10-12-10 3-26-12 _5" C-4 SITE PLAN 10-12-10 3-26-12 3 " .. NN '>..,♦ n1 F•- C-5 I SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 10-12-10 3-26-12 GENERAL PLAN_ n pp vxam.n wn,.rtl»ln J ; i y.:MU:li9•II NOTES . 1. Parcel boundaries,easements,and lease areas shown an this plan ore based on available C6 and other boundary mfarmol'lon. They do not b _ ,N - represent boundarns based on a boundary survey. _ Badcaa Crn7 En coin Z Dimensions shown in this plan are based on information provided by others which includes scaled lengths and lanited field measurements. @L.0Suzveying.LLLC 8 a '�` "� •'^'•'• l' ,J.n �- m t r Existing improvements here not been rield located by measurements taken by a registered land surveyor. :��,•� 8902 Afi6ek CL mnrtn. �,y r�_'4S '= Jwywe y ID Is..IN4Q56 ' ' • sbozdcncr®civl-Is.caaa REVISION BLOCK Rev.No. Desai lion Date .� y •Mtn 5. i r t REYI:rev.Pion Inez 11-32-18 S r.4 1 2' AEY1:m.Plan Index 12-06-10 a SITE OWER OWNER REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE 9 t � T T 3 REY1 mi.Plan Index 2-4-11 v Yv d W AEY4:rev.Pion Index 3-3-11 -V' 5 REPS:M.Plan Index 5-5-11 "y .. lNe..a,6WC .f.Yh.wpN ..,F • q; DATE :rev.Plan Index 5-11-11 •^ x z rev.Plan Index 3-26-12 SITE/TOWER OWNER REPRESENTATIVE PRINTED NAME C 1 1 " 1 1 Project Number 2010-082/Al00755A - w7 beet N0.: $ t 3 5 7 9 17 75 75 t7 i 0oo 69th Avenue North CONSTRUCTION&GENERAL NOTES OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR REGULATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS. AIM755A 14. ALL WORK PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN 31. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT LOCAL UTILITY LOCATE SERVICES A Zayo Utility Project STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS MINIMUM 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. Brooklyn Center,Nfiinnesota 1- Al WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED To THE STANDARDS SPECIFIED IN AND ORDINANCES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES TO 32 ALL WORK IN OR ALONG PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SKU BE ZAYO BNDWIDTH INSIDE PLANT/SITE LOCATION MANUa'. COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND PERFORMED TO THE APPROPRIATE SAFETY STANDARDS. WARNING JHF LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION DACES,GUARDS, FLASHERS,FLAGS AND FLAGMEN SHALL BE USED 2. THE CONTRACTOR SILALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS OVER THE PERFORMANCE OF THE EDRK. ACCORDANCE AND AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION TO VEHICULAR e AND PLAN DIMENSIONS, AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCOROMICE WITH TRAFFIC, THE PUBLIC AND WORKMEN. STATE LAWS, CITY AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS COUNTY ORDINANCES RELATIVE TO WORKING HOURS, TRAFFIC AS WELL AS LOCAL AND STATE CODES, ORDINANCES AND CONTROL WARNING SIGNALS, COLOR OF LENS IN FLASHERS, 3. A 20-FOOT HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FROM APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. GUARDS,FLAGMEN, ETC.,SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH WHEN WORKING tQN©WIDTH ALL EXISTING POWER LINES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK USING ON OR NEAR ANY PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.ALL DEVICES MUST BE IN 4, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, TOOLS, THE BEST SKILLS AND INTENTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALT. BE PLACE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE 400 CENTENNIAL PARKWAY EQUIPMENT,TRANSPORTATION AND POWER SERVICES NECESSARY FOR SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL Of THE CONSTRUCTION MEANS, MAINTAINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR DURING STE.200 AND INGDENTAL TO COMPLETION OF ALL WORK AS INDICATED ON METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR CONSTRUCTION. LOUISVILLE,CO 80027 THE DRAWINGS AND/OR AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. - COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT 33 ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATE THE GENERAL INCLUDING CONTACT AND COORDINATION WITH THE PROJECT REGULATIONS, PARTICULAR EMPHASIS HAS BEEN PLACED ON THE Plan Date:October 12th,2010 5. THE DRAWINGS ARE D ARRANGEMENT OF SSIAGR AND EQUIPMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE MANAGER AND THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. REQUIREMENT TO SHORE OR SLOPE ALL EXCAVATIONS GREATER INDICATED BY DIMENSIONS OR DETAILS, EXACT EQUIPMENT 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT THAN FOUR(4)FEET DEEP. c LOCATIONS SHALL BE GOVERNED BY ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVING, CURBS, GALVANIZED SURFACES, 34.' All DIMENSIONS PERTAINING TO BUILDING ENTRANCE FACWTIES AND AND/OR INSTRUCTIONS OF THE ENGINEER AND/OR OWNERS ETC.,AND UPON COMPLETION OF WORK,REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT BUILDING PENETRATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE R IS THE SOLE REPRESENTATIVE. OCCURRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL PROJECT MANAGER. DIMENSIONS AT LEAST 5 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION .. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL MATERN'S AS REQUIRED FOR COMPLETE SYSTEMS, INCLUDING ALL PARTS 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP THE GENERAL AREA CLEAN AND WITH THE BUILDING OWNER OR THE BUILDING OWNERS OBVIOUSLY OR REASONABLY INCIDENTAL TO A COMPLETE HAZARD FREE, DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS, AND RUBBISH AND REPRESENTATIVE. ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION, WHETHER SPECIFICALLY INDICATED OR NOT. All REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE CONTRACTOR DUE TO NOT NOTIFYING THE PROPER AUTHORITIES WILL SYSTEMS SHALL BE COMPLETELY ASSEMBLED, TESTED, ADJUSTED, PROPERTY. LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM BE REPAIRED AT THE SOLE EXPENSE OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND DEMONSTRATED TO BE READY FOR OPERATION PRIOR TO THE ANY PAINT SPOTS,DUST,OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE CONTRACTOR. OWNERS ACCEPTANCE 18, ALL AERIAL STRAND WILL BE 6.614 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED 35, THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR BLOWING 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN, PAY FOR AND DELVER All ON THE DRAWINGS. AND TESTING ALL MANHOLES PRIOR TO ENTRY. NO OPEN FLAME, - F REQUIRED PERMITS,CERTIFICATES OF INSPECTION, INCLUDING UTUTY TORCHO LIGHTED CIGAR, CIGARETTE OR PIPE SFW1 BE BROUGHT 79. ALL GUYING STRAND WILL BE 6.6M UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED CONNECTION FEES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITIES HAVING ON THE DRAWINGS. NEAR OR INTO TESTS OPEN MANHOLE THIS RULE SHALL BE OBSERVED c JURISDICTION. DELIVER CERTIFICATES TO THE OWNER PRIOR TO EVEN THOUGH TES1S INDICATE THAT THE ATMOSPHERE IS FREE OF a PE COMBUSTIBLE GAS, MANHOLES MUST BE CONTINUOUSLY VENTILATED plans Prepared By FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK 20. ALL ANCHORS SHALL BE 6'LONG,DOUBLE EYED, 10"SCREW TYATED . 8, THE CONTRACTOR OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONFINED TO AREAS OF UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS. AT All TIMES DURING WORK WITHIN THE MANHOLES. NEW CONSTRUCTION. 21. NEW POLES SHALL BE 35' CLASS 3 UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED 36. ZAYO BANDWIDTH,INC.AND/OR ITS REPRESENTATIVES,RESERVE THE RIGHT TO STOP CONSTRUCTION IF AT ANY TIME THEY DEEM THE ON THE DRAWINGS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIR AND/OR WORK TO BE UNSAFE, INADEQUATE OR HAZARDOUS. WORK Shall RESTORATION OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE EXISTING ACCESS ROADWAY 22. ALL AERW. CABLE SHALL BE DOUBLE-LASHED USING 0.45 NOT BE RESUMED UNTIL AGREEABLE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN a AND AM ADJACENT SITE AS A RESULT OF HIS USE DURING STAINLESS LASHING WIRE TO RESOLVE ANY ISSUES. CUHifUNICd11UNS 6BOUP CONSTRUCTION, ALL DISTURBED AND DAMAGED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER UPON 23. ALL CONDUIT SHALL BE 2.00 INCH INSIDE DIAMETER SCH 80 PVC 37. ANY AND ALL DAMAGE TO ASPHALT, CONCRETE PAVEMENT, CURBS, N COMPLETION Of ALL WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS. GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, PAVERS. DRAINAGE DITCHES, EMBANKMENTS, 1AMBMYA0AD,SVMNn ® SHRUBS, TREES, GRASS SOD, ETC., SHALL BE THE SOLE SASTW1MTAGZ.)0_ raone nz9uavv a 10. THE CONTRACTOR SNAIL REMOVE ALL WASTE, DEBRIS AND TRASH 24. ALL CONDUIT FITTINGS SHALL BE UL USTlI1. RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE YAx?32-237-1196 .. FROM SITE AND DISPOSE OF IN A LEGAL MANNER ON A DAILY 25 THE TOP OF ALL BURIED POWER CONDUIT/CABLE WILL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY RESTORED TO THE ORIGINAL OR BETTER CONDITION AT '* BASIS. 36" BELOW GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON 7HE THE EXPENSE OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR. 1 i. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION TO HIS BID,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DRAWINGS. THE TOP OF ALL BURIED DATA CONDUIT/CABLE WILL BE 38, THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SFW1 NOT START ANY WORK - &L-d =.i-&L C VISIT THE JOB SITE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACED 24' BELOW GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE UNTIL AN APPROVED PERMIT OR WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE dAL"Od�IIr` LtC CONFIRMING THAT ALL DIMENSIONS ARE AS SHOWN AND THAT THE DRAWINGS. PROPERTY OWNER IS IN HIS OR HER POSSESSION. 8 - WORK MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN, PRIOR TO PROCEEDING Indpls,it146]56 WITH CONSTRUCTION, ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALT. BE BROUGHT TO 26. ALL 90 DEG CONDUIT SWEEPS SHALL BE MIN 3"n'RADIUS UNLESS 39. ALL TRENCHING WITHIN SITE COMPOUND TO BE HAND DUG. ��� pffcc:536 6181 Y THE ATTENTION TO THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWINGS. abordrna(aJav`l-la.cam 12. FOR ITEMS NOT CLEARLY DEFINED OR IDENTIFIED BY THE CONTRACT 27. MAXIMUM PULLING TENSION ON CABLES IS 600 LES. REVISION BLOCK a DOCUMENTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT START WORK ON SUCH Rer.Na Desa Don Ode 8 ITEMS WITHOUT HAVING RECEIVED WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO 28. PUWNG EYE MUST BE USED AND ATTACHED CORRECTLY TO CABLE PROCEED. VIA 600 LB BREAKWAY SWIVEL 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN 29. GROUND UND TILI SHALL BE�2 AND EXOTHERMICALLY BONDED TO THE RING.ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS PtojectNumber. 2010-082/AIOO755A SPECIFICALLY INDICATED OTHERWISE W THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 30. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPLYING ALL MATERIALS AS Sheet No.: C-2 3 } 15 17 1 } 5 1 e e ENCLOSURE MOUNTED 100069th Avenue North.-......,., MOUNTED TO UNISTRLTT ELEC. PANEL/ PPC A100755A UNISTRUT MOUNTED Zayo utility Project ,+ TO ZAYO CABINET :Brooklyn Center,Mnn6ota.`.. ALL CONDUITS TO CONVERT TO 1" PENETRATE I 0 ELEC. m s PLATFORM 3R NEMA PANEL P WARNING TAPE AND BE SECURED TO / PC FIBER CABINET WITH FINAL GRADE e CONDUIT LOCK NUTS COIL INNEROUCT 11" CONDUIT FROM ,.Nr_ POWER SOURCE r>/., a Ii-III BANDWIDTH ATTACH FIBER TO PLATFORM WCABIN4 ' = 2" CONDUIT TO ITH 4 OSP SERVING i;q!i /%% i' PLACE 3"x B-o" cALV. 00 CENTENNIAL PARKWAY ':�. SS BOLTS, NUTS AND =171 �i' w WASHERS LOCATION. SEE STEEL U-GUARD WITH 30 SEE.200 NOTE \ 1. \ #12 AWG TRACER WIRE GRADE OF 1.25" INNERDUCT LOP1anDiate.Ivl 080027 .: EXIST GR D :'^ , r arch 26th.2012 15 DIA. SUPPORT S\\T%rr�i\�\\^� ' \ri\(i,;i i r \\fir U-GUARD 70 2"SCH. 80 FROM NEMA FEET AT FOUR ��\:••\� .r,, ., ,° EXTEND A MIN. Of o ENCLOSURE TO CABINET CORNERS. SEE CONDUIT "'; i�Y "i'✓i�i� 6" BELOW GRADE NOTE 5. MULTIPLE CONDUITS NOTES: MAY BE PLACED IN PROPOSED CONDUIT THE SAME TRENCH 1. ISP CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH OSP CONTRACTOR NOTE: TOP 1'-6" 2. 3R NEMA MOUNTED CABINET SIMILAR TO HOFFMAN MODEL A24R248HCR SHALL BE FREE OF 3. CONTRACTOR TO USE CABINETS EXISTING KNOCKOUTS FOR CONDUIT ROUTING DEBRIS AND COMPACTED TO CABINET . .. .. .. 4.ROOF TOP CONDUIT SHALL BE EMT EXCEPT FOR FIBER CABINET TO NEMA CONNECTION WHICH MAY BE SCH. 80 PVC. 5, 7J' RUBBER PADS SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN SUPPORT FEET AND HARD ROOF SURFACES. .:: .. . METAL PLATFORM DEMARCATION TYPICAL TRENCH DETAIL TYPICAL RISER DETAIL )'PLYWOOD EQUIPMENT BaW . EITIERNET CONNEC110N TYPE 3R NEMA ENCLOSURE CWSS6 k CIRCUIT GROUNDS-)TYPE r GROUND RING PROPOSED CONDUITS SHALL I _ _ CABINET x ENTER SIDE OF ENCLOSURE NOTES: _ i WITH LB FITTING IF BOTTOM ENTRY IS NOT AVA EQUIPMENT 2 I - 3'-Q" ILABLE '-0" ENCLOSURE 1,TELCO CONDUITS AND s WESTEL SKOJACK ENCLOSURE .O 111 FITTINGS SHALL NOT RUN ( I EanPm ' THROUGH THE POWER -� `aL�.E°�OCIDg ptlS6 L J 41ZVI,'� nd..w...,auy LLC SIDE OF ANY PPC. A7i1xF L�2.POWER CONDUITS AND 2'CONDUT FROM FlBER CAB NET ;! p1s,IN46?56 PROPOSED CONDUITS FITTINGS SHALL NOT RUN � =536-6181 ? d=c�civB-Is.c SHALL ENTER BOTTOM OF THROUGH THE TELCO 1'CONDUIT FOR GROUND WIRING ENCLOSURE IF POSSIBLE SIDE OF ANY PPC. _ _ _ _ #2 COPPER/TINNED � N BLOCK SOLID GROUND WIRE - GROUND BUSS TO BE EXOTHERMICN.LY I Oat' CONNECTED TO NALO GROUND OR GROUND ROD-� 7 1 REVII:m,mount&b1 11-02-10 CADWELD (TYP.) 2 REP2:rev,mount*td 12-06r10 y 2'CONDUIT TO Btb NOTE POWER AND 3 REY3:m.mount detail 2-4-11 SERVICE CABLES TO GROUND BUSS EAR TO BE ATTACHED 4 REY6:rev. v of detai 5-11-11 BE GROUNDED AT TO�'PLYWOOD EOUIPMEM BOARD 5 REYI:m. uipmenl details 3-26-12 MULTILINK MGB DBINET TO BE IXOTHERMICAILY CONNECTED F TO HALO GROUND OR GROUND ROD PmjectNutnber. 2010-082/A10(1755A S CONDUIT ENTRY INTO EXISTING ENCLOSURE TYPICAL GROUNDING DETAIL NEMA BOX GROUNDING DETAIL C-3 Sheet No. = 1 ] 5 ) 9 17 1} 15 17 8 1000 69th Avenue North A100755A L ASPHALT ACCESS DRIVE Zayo Utility Protect .Brooklyn Center,Minnesota`<' ----------------- CURB i --------- ----------- � � e ----------------- v woc -roc -roc n-rvc -FOC rroc—0--n FOC—j— I N BA[3D11VIDT�! I 400 CENTENNIAL PARKWAY Site Construction Legend SERVING POLE I STE.200 :. ITEM DESCRIPTION ::.. SCALE Conned 2 Sch..80'PVC conduit to Zayo hand hole and serving pole. CONDUIT PLACEMENT TO BE:DIRECTIONAtLY BORED.:See other, 0 5 X10 15 20 plans for.OSPIDUlin9 LOUISVILLE,CO 80027 1 I Plan Date:March 26th,2612 Place.12 IR.'of;2"'Sch.80 PVC conduit for Zayo fiber optic connection..Conduit to be stubbed 6 above grade and placed at o i 1 inch=10 ft. a Z 'minimum depth of 24 below'g ode.."Conduit placement td be open 4renched. 1rl� l SIDEWALK SITEPLAN Place 12.111.of 1.:5ch 80-PVC conduit for power..Conduit to be stubbed 6'above grade and placed at a minimum depth of 36" il below arode Conduit.plocemen(1c,be open*trenched:.:Enter building through new wall core and 1.8 fitting. Inside building 3 itransition to 1 EMT.and coord note condul V placement kh building owner: Conduit to be secured to ceiling,floor,malls,and coble' rocks appropriotely.'.'RefeCto'Zaya Bandwidth"Inside Plant/Site Location Manuol'.for connedions'to power dislribulion'.panel and CDNDUR EM NT TO wiring connections:: - I T- BE DIRECTIONALLY BORED 15'WIDE T MOBILE Set Zayo cabinet and Type 3R NEMA'box on a 3'x 4'concrete pad with chamfered edges using a Zayo approved platform mount I ACCESS/UTILITY 4 kit.. Connect fiber:coBmel to NEMA'box.with.2"seallight conduit. Refer to Zayo Bandwidth" —————Inside Plant/Siteldcalion Monual'for < F—— CASEMENT cabinet and wiring connections. .: Place 14 IN,of 2"Sch.80 PVC conduit to existing T-Mobile equipment for service. :Conduit to be stubbed 6'above grade and r Placed of b minimum:depth of.24".below grade..Conduit placement to be open trenched.—Enter building through new wall core and 5 '1.8 fitting.,Inside balding,transition to.2'EMT end coordinate conduit placement with building owner. Conduit to be secured to'' ' SIDEWALK ceiling,floor,walls,and cable rocks appropriately. Refer ao Zayo Bandwidth'Inside Plant/Ste Location Manuel'for.connections to .'. power distribution panel and wiring connections. s _ K TELCO PANEL rz ( IXISfING EQUIPMENT $ t ,iuf i t uOAIE NEW WALL I x AC SCORE&LB e RUT FITTING ( — Bomiimct civa Evip=n t � LOAD CENTER 'bwk CL ' -- -r_------ RH I ZAYO bdph.,IN 46256 1 1 •NNr I 1 ,vw!�:4 W o-;G 4.t1- I x" - NAND a NEXfE1 EQUIPMENT Office:536-6181 7 c Yx. I HOLE BUILDING I _ sbord=<50 01%w REVISION BLOCK Rev.No,I Description 'Dote add rnz. d for equip. 11-02-10 flev.Z location 2-4-11 d 3 1 REV4:Rev.FOC route bore note 3-3-11 v i CLEARWIRE EQUIPMENT 4 REVS:Rey.Zayo equip, 5-5-11 a+a WATER TOWER 5 REVS:Per.conslnxUon Imend 5-11-11 6 1 REY7:Rev,Zoyo equaiment 3-26-12 WATER TOWER LEGS PmjectNumber. 2010-0821A100755A Sheet No.: C-4 8 t J S 7 9 li 1J 15 17 w�i�,..t �� ,v.i `Ir i •r h ,rrt ty� t �,�ar �.,4*�. e+ e - 100069th Avenue North A100755A '.. F aT .. Zayo Utility Project Brooklyn Center N innesota rY1,s -TrSOPIiiL�,"FJO.rYIsCr'.c 'S'taf§k`77F'+'Ttnrht%.L �h� m�� rk4n '1 l.'Ol�'17, A�t`K r t •R�4i a,�V s1�it+3�Ircrrn�rrN1a k��isYsl F��nnYvn 5sattr' yn C# ,iEiF tt P.PQ "MANWA, dM rf 7A,yV !k''x'b Kn1t 1 Vi tP '! ililSI 1 BAND ' �J�.t ,�' "+4`3FU5b8 � py s .wt(Cdiih4Sw't4 400 CENTENNIAL PARKWAY �� � �. 1 n STE.200 � M LOUISVILLE,CO 80027 I Plan Date:March 26th,2012 ' T—MOBILE PLACARD PROPOSED ZAYO LOCATION ar Il�'Re 4 I T—MOBILE HUT SERVING POLE Lo.4 �. i d iN t &L.M mg mLc 8 1.41..,IN 46256 '� lo, yy, •• Ot6cc:536-6181 ebo dmc4@.iW-1- a ^ ' `REVISION BLOCK _ Ra.Na Desai'n ate � 1 AEY3:Aemwed imou 2-4-11 1t r'k,+}>; �• 2 AEY4:R-md im c 3-3-11 3 REV6:Added image 5-11-11 g 4 RER:Added imoges X25-12 , Pmject Number: 2010-082/AI00755A a T—MOBILE HUT Sheet No.: C-5 g 7 3 5 7 9 It I} 15 t7 City Council Agenda Item No. 6f i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 23, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager sy FROM: Vickie Schleuning,�Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting Quotation and Awarding a Contract for 2012 Diseased Tree Removal Program Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the Resolution Accepting Quotation and Awarding a Contract for 2012 Diseased Tree Removal Program to_Arbor Design Tree Service Inc. Background: The City of Brooklyn Center has administered a Diseased Tree Removal program since 1974 and annually establishes a program to expedite the removal of diseased and other nuisance trees as defined in City Ordinance Chapter 20. When a diseased tree is marked on the boulevard, the City shares in half the cost of the removal provided the removal is conducted under the City's annual Diseased Tree Removal contract. The property owner is invoiced for approximately half the cost of the removal. When a diseased tree is marked on private property, the owner is responsible for the removal and disposal of the tree. City staff informs property owners of the importance of removing diseased trees to minimize the propagation of tree disease to adjacent properties. If a property owner fails to remove a diseased tree the City acquires a quotation from the contractor for the cost of removal. The quotation is presented to the property owner prior to proceeding with removal of the diseased tree. j Unpaid charges for tree removal are levied as a special assessment against the respective parcels of land. Special assessments are levied over a period of five years. The five year payment program assists many property owners with financing tree removal costs. The tree removal quantities listed on the quotation form are based on the number of diseased trees removed by the City's tree removal contractor in 2011. However, City staff continues to monitor the transmission of various tree diseases, including Emerald Ash Borer, throughout Minnesota to determine if additional response measures will be necessary in the future. The City received bids for tree removal based on the average number of trees removed previous years. The City is not obligated to choose the contractor with the lowest bid. However, staff is recommending the tree contractor that submitted the lowest bid, which is the same price as the Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people anti preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM 2011 Tree Disease Removal Contract amount. The contractor has a satisfactory record with the Better Business Bureau and has been used by the City in previous years. Budget Issues: The City's share of the cost of removal for diseased trees within the public right-of-way and City property is included in the 2012 Budget under the Public Works Forestry operating budget. Property owners may pay their share of costs to the City directly or the costs are specially assessed to the property in accordance with Minnesota State Law. Council Goals: Strategic: 3. We will ensure a safe and secure community 8. We will encourage citywide environmental sustainability efforts Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inchisive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust i Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTATION AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR 2012 DISEASED TREE REMOVAL WHEREAS, staff solicited quotations from tree removal contractors and the following five quotations were received and opened on April 16, 2012 for 2012 Diseased Tree Removal Program. Bidder Bid Amount Arbor Design Tree Service $38,835.00 Pioneer Tree and Landscape $41,328.00 Arbor Barber $45,451.82 S & S Tree Specialists $52,780.00 Arbortech $54,812.30 WHEREAS, it appears that Arbor Design Tree Service is the most responsible bidder for 2012 Diseased Tree Removal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into a contract with Arbor Design Tree Service in the name of the City of Brooklyn Center for 2012 Diseased Tree Removal according to the plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Building and Community Standards. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Council Agenda Item o. 6g a COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 23,2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Gary Eitel,Director of Business&Development °° SUBJECT: Resolution Supporting an Application by Aeon for Hennepin County Environmental Financial Response Funds. (View Pointe at Shingle Creek) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval/adoption of a Resolution Supporting an Application by Aeon for Hennepin County Environmental Financial Response Funds. (View Pointe at Shingle Creek) Background: Aeon, a non-profit developer, owner;and manager of high-quality affordable apartment homes in the Minneapolis/St.Paul area is in the process of acquiring the View Pointe at Shingle Creek 122 unit apartment building, located at 6221 Shingle Creek Parkway from the Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD). To ensure that these apartments are providing a healthy living environment for its residents, Aeon will have a Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment; a Lead and Asbestos Inspection; and a Lead and Asbestos Operation and Management Plans completed before finalizing their acquisition and mortgage commitments for this project. As a non-proft organization, Aeon is submittin g an application to the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund (REF) for $15,000 to cover the costs of these environmental reviews and plans. Budget Issues: The Resolution provides for the City Council's support of Aeon's application to Hennepin County's ERF Program and does not involve a financial commitment or contribution by the City. Council Goals: Select not more than two. Strategic: 2 We will stabilize and improve residential neighborhoods Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION BY AEON FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL FINANCIAL RESPONSE FUNDs (View Pointe at Shingle Creek) WHEREAS, Aeon, a non-profit developer, owner, and manager of high-quality affordable apartment homes in the Minneapolis/St.Paul area, has prepared an application requesting grant funds from the Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services; and WHEREAS,the grant funds will be used for Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment; Lead and Asbestos Inspection; and Lead and Asbestos Operation and Management Plans for View Pointe at Shingle Creek, a 122 unit HUD apartment building, located at 6221 Shingle Creek Parkway in Brooklyn Center, NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Brooklyn Center supports Aeon's Environmental Response Fund Grant Application being submitted to the Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services on the first of May, 2012 for Environmental Testing and Reports for the View Pointe at Shingle Creek Apartments project, located at 6221 Shingle Creek Parkway in Brooklyn Center April 23, 2012 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 1 � a W�"2 j as KA: u. 1 s - ?_ e. +ice � •� �, � i� I, I •I •4p tom=}j' f� • -- View Pointe at Shingle Creek 6221 Shingle Creek Parkway { http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_AreIMS/ims?ServiceName=be_logismap_ovsde&ClientVersio... 3/12/2012 Ai af%on Homes for Genorati6ns April 12,2012 h1r. Gary Rite],Business and Development Directol! City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle.Creek Parkway Brooklyn Cetupt,MN 55430 kie:, Applidatibn to Hennepin County's 4ivironmental-Response Fiord (RUFF) Dear 1\41:; Eitel: Aeon respectfully requestS-file Cih,oM:ooklyn Center's support for air application to Hennepin County's Environmental Response Fund (ERF).As you ate aware,Aeon is in the process of purchasing theapart.timit building currently known as'Vievv-Pointeat Shingle Creek located at 6221. Shingle Creek Park-way.We anticipate completing the purchase in early suminer and 6losin oti the 9 financing for the proposed rehabilitation work shortly thereafter.As part of the purchase and funding-approvals,we are required to coinplete certain envitonmental reviews.The ERF grant program can fund the environmental reviews,however,Be nnepiii County requires a resolution of support from the City be included with our application. Far the.E RF grant application,we.-,-,,ill be requesting$15ffl0 for the cost o£completing Plia.sc-land Phase 11 Environmental Site Asscssrno-nt8;Lead and Asbestos inspections;and Lead and Asbestos Opetation and h4aintenmice Plans. While-soiree environmental reviews wore conipleted by the previous owner's lender in 1999,it is not clear if any items-we xe-abated or mitigated, otif surfacea witl-i potential contaminants may have deteriorated or been daiiiaged in the int6rim.The reviews will provide the jjeCeSS,,jry environmental information to the funders and help ensure that eve are providing--a healthy emrironment for Out residents, We'- areireq-excited to close on the purchase of the property and the fund-Un . . 3 , 9 for the anticipated j:o-li,,ibilit,qt-ion. OLir staff is preparing to take-o.-,-,,iier.sliil) of the I)ilildin -,ttidliell)-iii,,ike�7icwP(jintc.,'I 9 strong and viable con-n-nunity asset.Aeon is gra * tefal fob the City's support! Please.call riie 1(612- 746v-0522 or email me at jleb tihoff(( aeoninn.org with any questions. Sincerely, James Lehnhoff Senior Developer 901 N6rth'FIflrd Street,Sifitc 150,1\%imiea plis,IMN 550-I Ph 612-341-3148 F 612-341.4208 p i II aeon, Fact Sheet Homes for Generations About Aeon Overview Aeon is a nonprofit developer,owner and manager of high-quality affordable apartment homes in the Minneapolis/St.Paul area.The award-winning nonprofit has built or renovated 1,934 apartments and townhomes,which provide stability to more than 3,000 people each year.The organization's inspiration to create community assets that last for generations is connected to its name"Aeon,"which means"forever." Mission To create and sustain quality affordable homes that strengthen lives and communities. Vision That every person has a home and is interconnected within community. History Aeon was originally founded in 1986 to replace 350 units of housing that were demolished to build the Minneapolis Convention Center.Its first development,Buri Manor,provided 38 units of single room occupancy apartments for minimum wage earners. Services Renovating and building homes with a strong emphasis on quality and community participation. Overseeing property management to provide day-to-day management. Supporting successful tenancy by offering workshops on budgeting and housekeeping,and connecting residents with community social services. Values Community:Collaborate in the design of vibrant,healthy neighborhoods. Tnist:Develop strong,effective relationships. Diversity:Build an inclusive organization and community. Excellence:Set and achieve high-quality goals and standards. Sustainability:Ensure properties are long-term community assets. Leadersho:Advance positive community change. 901 North 3rd Street,Suite 150,Minneapolis,MN 55401 •(612)341-3148 •FAX(612)3414208 •v~.aeommn.ory i aeon. Fact Sheet Homes for Generations Residents Aeon primarily serves individuals and families earning low incomes.Special populations include homeless youth,homeless adults and homeless adults seeking a sober community. Aeon's properties include: • 500+homes for individuals experiencing homelessness • 625+homes for minimum wage workers • 385+homes for very low-income families ® 225+homes for low-to moderate-income families In 2010,Aeon served 3,149 people,21%of whom were 19 years old or younger. Funding Aeon raises the money needed to buy and build properties from city,state and federal programs,as well as public and private loans. Aeon's yearly organizational expenses are funded through corporate and foundation grants, individual donations,developer fees and government funding. Property operating expenses are funded primarily by resident rents.Many very-low income families and individuals receive government rental assistance. Boards Aeon's Board is comprised of 18 directors,of which at least three directors are residents of Aeon properties.The remaining directors are professionals in the fields of housing,planning, finance,or bring other meaningful experience. Aeon's 15-member Board of Advisors provides valuable connections to businesses and other community sectors.It advises leadership staff in areas critical to the success of the organization. Awards Aeon has received numerous local and national awards for excellence in design,historic preservation and contributions to the community. Properties Aeon owns and manages 36 properties and 1,934 units of affordable housing in Minneapolis, St.Paul,Roseville and Chaska. Partners Aeon welcomes the partnership of individuals,businesses and other organizations who want to help meet the need for affordable homes in the Twin Cities.To learn about donations, in-kind gifts or other opportunities to partner with Aeon,please call 612-341-3148 or visit www.aeommn.org. Learn Learn how Aeon uses innovative ways to provide quality affordable homes for individuals and More families.Attend Building Dreams,a one-hour informative session about the need for affordable housing in the Twin Cities. Visit tvww.aeommn.org bd for upcoming dates of Building Dreams.Register online or contact Jenny Johnson at 612-746-0519 or jjohnson@aeommn.org. 901 North 3rd Street,Suite 150,Minneapolis,MN 55401 • (612)341-3148 •FAX(612)341-4208 •www.aeommn.org i City Council Agenda Item No. 7a COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 23, 2012 TO: City Council FROM: Curt Boganey, City Mana SUBJECT: Annual Report Building and Community Standards Department Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council receive the report regarding highlights of department activities. Background: Annually City Departments are given an opportunity to present operational results for the prior year. On Monday, the Building and Community Standards Department will present operating result for the calendar year 2011. Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Council Goals: Strategic: 2 We will stabilize and improve residential neighborhoods 4. We will improve the city's image Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust 2011 Depar ent Update Building & Community Standards Department April 1 -t►s • � ..,E�!"` i Brooklyn Center—A Great Place to Start, a Great Place to Stay! I Table of Contents Topic Page Department Overview........ ............................... 2 General Achievements........................................... 3-4 Program Summaries Rental Program................................................. 5-6 Building Construction Inspections.......................... 7-9 Vacant Building Program..................................... 10-11 Neighborhood Maintenance.................................. 12-14 Photograph Examples 15-24 This report highlights some of the programs and activities of the Building & Community Standards Department and is not intended to be all inclusive. It is through the cooperation and contribution of department employees, other city departments, the City Manager, City Council, commissions, residents, businesses, community organizations and other various parties that the city goals and objectives are achieved. Clean, safe and attractive residential and commercial neighborhoods are the foundation of a vibrant community. The Building & Co>nmunityStandards Department, in conjunction with internal and external partners, works to ensure neighborhoods are clean, safe and attractive where people want to live and do business. Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page I Department Overview The Building and Community Standards Department provides services to residents and businesses to ensure the community is built and maintained in a clean, safe and attractive ® j mannera community where people want to live and do business. C MO The department monitors construction through plan review activities and construction site visits for building, plumbing, mechanical, fire suppression, electrical, water and sewer, and sign r permit applications to ensure compliance with city ordinances, and State Building and Fire ER Codes. Residential rental properties are inspected to ensure health and life safety standards are (D met. The department also addresses community concerns such as property maintenance, zoning, 0 signs, health/life safety hazards, public nuisances and various quality of life standards. C Neighborhood preservation and good relations between neighbors are encouraged through proactive property maintenance sweeps in each neighborhood, as well as response to citizen complaints and concerns. Department staff work with all city departments, advisory groups, �- nonprofit agencies, businesses and citizens to help keep properties and the environment clean, safe, and maintained to community standards. Neighborhood initiatives such as foreclosure related issues and the vacant building program are administered, along with other community improvement strategies. 1 0 Department Mission Department Goals The department is committed to providing 1. Provide quality services in a responsive, all those who choose to make Brooklyn customer oriented and fiscally Center their home, occupational center or responsible manner. l place to visit with quality service related to 2. Increase the level of communication and I I development, property maintenance, and public education regarding building � housing. This is accomplished through the codes, property maintenance, life and use of modern technology and quality health safety and general community 1 assurance by a team of people dedicated to standards. professional excellence and customer 3. Implement activities that promote high satisfaction. We strive to accomplish these standards for residential and commercial tasks efficiently, effectively and with neighborhoods, from initial construction accountability to the community we serve. through lifespan. L Ensuring clean,safe and attractive neighborhoods where people want to live and do business. Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 2 i The Building & Community Standards Department carefully coordinates work activities in order to meet city goals and customer expectations. Functions are carried out in consideration of city goals and four perspectives- the customer, operations, financial, and organizational learning. The following are a few activities that address these perspectives at a department level. More details are provided in the program sections of this report. Customer Service Community Engagement--Neighborhood 1 The use of technology has improved Meetings-Throughout the summer months, I customer service including more information staff participated in four neighborhoods available on the city website, meetings. At the neighborhood meeting i C implementation of ePermits for certain staff have the opportunity to educate and permits that do not require a plan review, engage citizens. This makes citizens more Request Tracker that is an online reporting aware of current neighborhood programs � system, and other methods of and what they can do to improve their communication. A recently installed phone neighborhood. The ability to get feedback D system has allowed customers to remain on about the neighborhood and its residents 0 the line until their call can be answered, allows them to be better served. which also reduces staff time to return phone C calls. ARM (Association for Responsible Management) CD Education and communication is a priority By coordinated efforts of city staff a bi- B for the department. Educational materials monthly meeting with owners and managers CD continue to be upgraded, in addition to of rental properties is held at City Hall. Arm developing new brochures for signs and the strives to foster a cohesive and respectful � rental program. Information about city community by promoting clean, safe and programs is also provided to peers and attractive rental communities. Various professional groups. Video Segments-In topics are discussed each meeting to provide cooperation with Channel twelve staff have owners and managers information about been able to participate in educational videos good business practices or community news. topics include Vacant Building Program, In 2011 topics included youth outreach Spring Cleanup, Fall Maintenance Tips, programs, tenant and landlord laws, housing Special Materials Drop-off, Senior Home market trends, mediation services, Resources, and more. prevention of child & domestic abuse, and adult basic education offerings. To increase the effectiveness of the ARM BROOKLYN CENTER ININNESOTA meetings and rental education program, � CURRENT Z,­ meetings were extended to both single and � multi-family property owners/managers. Landlords and managers were surveyed - about possible topics of interest. CTpTt115p°tLgY� � �-� a Building and Community Standards Department 201 1 Department Update Page 3 Operations—Improved Efficiencies substandard for consideration for these programs. Where appropriate, technology is used to increase efficiencies and improve processes. As part of the City's foreclosure strategy, The use of Laserfiche for data retention was programs were created to provide down implemented for some of the department payment and rehab assistance (up to documents. Reporting and processing for $10,000)to qualified buyers to purchase special assessments has been automated. foreclosed and vacant homes in the city. Through GIS integration with the inspection Since the program started in 2009,the City software program, inspections are mapped has provided assistance to 100 buyers,the for certain functions such as vacant building majority of which are at 50 percent to 80 and property maintenance inspections. This percent of AMI (Area Medium Income). has increased efficiencies by conducting inspections based off their geographic Continual Learning and proximity. Improvement More sophisticated city programs require Financial Considerations higher levels of training and performance from the organization and staff. The Costs of service have been calculated and department is committed to ongoing implemented in accordance with legal improvement and learning. Staff training parameters in order to recover some of the and standardization continues to be crucial city costs of service. Revenue is generated to ensure quality services and maintain for construction plan review and permits, professional certifications. Both internal and Vacant Building Registrations, external training is conducted, as well as reinspections, abatement service charges, internal quality assurance. rental licenses, rental conversions, and the . Dangerous dog training was hosted to administrative penalty system. These fees educate about the warning signs of a help offset the cost of administering dangerous dogs and how to approach neighborhood and community programs. different situations. This was important information for the safety of city field Costs of service and fees are reviewed staff and included staff invited within the annually. Staff continues to research options organization and from other cities. to improve the cost effectiveness of our ® Personnel from our non-profit assistance programs. programs presented information to staff about their programs and services. This allows staff to provide better referrals to Renew Home Purchase Program and residents and businesses. ReMove & ReBuild Programs . Staff attends continuing education courses offered by professional The City of Brooklyn Center's ReNew organizations, government agencies and Home Purchase program gets foreclosed, local building and housing agencies. vacant homes reoccupied with responsible, This training helps enhance skills, share informed homeowners. The program is program information among cities, as designed for people who can afford to well and provide updates about code purchase and maintain a home, along with changes and trends. managing the responsibilities of home . Several policy,procedure and program ownership. The ReNew and ReBuild manuals were developed to ensure the program find homes in need of substantial work is performed in a consistent, rehabilitation or demolition. Inspectors quality manner. often refer homes that need care or Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 4 Rental Licensing Program The purpose of the rental licensing program is to maintain the city's rental housing in a safe and attractive manner, so they are assets to the community. As part of the Rental Housing Improvement Strategy, extensive research was conducted to determine the health of the city's rental properties. The increase in number of rental properties, demands for city services, and (D concerns by citizens necessitated the need for a different type of program. After extensive research and analysis, in April 2010 a new performance based rental license program was implemented that made property owners accountable for the management and maintenance of their rental properties and tenants for their behavior. The program provides incentives for properties that are well managed and well maintained. The program also incorporates effective enforcement tools to ensure rental properties are safe, healthful, and well maintained. O 0 Highlights: • The program helps recover some of the • Internal systems were developed to city costs associated with monitoring and monitor properties in each category. rental properties and programs. Landlords that have received a lower • The initial results of the new license category are required to complete performance based rental license Crime Free Housing Programs and plans program shows improvement in the for improvement. Staff from Building & condition and management of rental Community Standards, Police and properties. Administration works with the property • Significant renovations have occurred in owners to develop a plan for apartment complexes in the past couple improvement. of years. In 2010, Gateway Commons, • Public education materials were previously Centerpointe Apartments, developed and distributed, the was completely renovated with upgraded Association of Responsible Managers apartments, new resident recreation (ARM) newsletter is mailed to all rental building, fencing and security properties including single family improvements. In 2012, Granite Peaks, homes. Continue to educate landlord and previously Brookhaven Apartments. tenants through the licensing process, • Research programs and projects to landlord meetings, publications and encourage rental properties to improve other means. the attractiveness and amenities above e Many landlords have an increased the minimums of the code. awareness of ongoing property maintenance and proper management. o Many landlords are taking more time - -- preparing their property for the inspections and monitoring their properties on an ongoing basis as indicated by the higher percentage of _I-� T+ Type I and II Rental Licenses. Granite Peaks Remodel 2012(former Brookhaven) Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 5 Number of 1 t Inspections Rental Section 8 Inspections Inspections 2005 504 550 2006 459 585 2007 550 504 2008 894 546 2009 1,055 669 2010 757 595 2011 1,157 626 Number of . , Rental Properties Number on: Single Family/Duplex Multifamily January 1, 2008 287 - January 1, 2009 321 - January 1 2010 489 75 January 1, 2011 478 72 Janua 1,2012 569 71 *Does not include pending licenses Licenses Number of Rental by Category License Category 2010 2011 Type I —3 Year 72 194 Type II—2 Year 77 208 Type III— 1 Year 27 48 Type IV—6 Months 13 20 2011 Rental Property License Type IV-6 Breakdown Months, 20, 4% Type III—1-- Year,48, Type I—3 10% Year, 194, 42% I Type 11—2 Year, 208, 44% Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 6 Construction Inspections The Building Inspection program assists homeowners, contractors and businesses with their construction projects to ensure that projects are completed in compliance with building codes, _ safe and structurally sound. Inspection staff coordinates construction projects to facilitate the construction process internally and for external customers. Q rF Highlights: o Evans Nordby Funeral Home began "S $500,000+ interior renovation to the C7 • Internal systems were developed for building. workflow processes within the o Construction of a 60,000 sq. ft. Q■ department and to coordinate other city addition began on the NW Family departments involved in the development Services building located at 7051 and construction process. Brooklyn Boulevard. • Public educational materials were o Construction of the FBI regional developed to guide developers and Headquarters was completed in 2011. residents through the city development o Two new restaurants opened along and construction process. This Shingle Creek Pkwy, The Global a � information is available in City Hall and Kitchen and Ocean Buffet. Q on the city website. o Precision, Inc. purchased the building • Extensive training and cross training at 1700 Freeway Boulevard and did a occurred to ensure staff were able to 33,062 sq. ft. improvement to the meet the needs of the developers, space before occupying. i contractors and public. o A link connecting the Earle Brown • ePermits were implemented for certain Heritage Center and Embassy Suites projects that do not require plan review. was completed. • A contract was created with the City of o Auto Zone moved into the building at Minnetonka to assist with the high 6350 Brooklyn Boulevard after workload associated with construction making interior and exterior activity including plan review and improvements. technical inspections. o Brown College moved into a 24,624 • Significant Construction Projects sq. ft. space at 5951 Earle Brown Dr. beginning or completed in 2011 • In 2011, the Luther Auto Group began _ construction of two new dealerships, Honda and Toyota along Brooklyn Boulevard, anticipating completion in 2012. I • Demolition of the Easter portion of Brookdale Shopping Center took place in 2011 followed by construction of a new 189,580 sq. ft. u. Walmart. Completion .1 • Metro Transit began construction of a 7 36 X 46 single story addition to their facility. Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 7 Construction ' i No. of Project No. Plan No. Permit Inspections Permits Valuation Reviews 2005 3,058 $26,606,427 245 4,147 2006 2,825 $26,761529 209 6,635 2007 2,741 $25,230,574 175 3,968 2008 2,095 $41,410,517 121 3,567 2009 2 094 $19,283,350 146 4,132 2010 2,828 $67,2072191 172 4,442 2011 2,653 $68 494 550 214 5,580 Photos of Northwest Family Services Building and Regional FBI Building Under Construction in 2011 -1 t r r� Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 8 Highlighted Building Construction Projects 2006 $ 516,000 Endura Financial -- 5825 Xerxes Ave N $ 715,000 Health Partners Remodel 6845 Lee Ave N $ 650,000 Automation -- 4830 Azelia Ave N $ 4,600,000 New Embassy Suites -- Grading&Foundation Only -- 6300 Earle Brown $ 810,006 Dr Arena Learning Center -- 6415 Brooklyn Blvd 2007 $ 510,000 Endura Financial -- 5825 Xerxes Ave N $ 715,000 Health Partners Remodel 6845 Lee Ave N $ 650,000 Automation -- 4830 Azelia Ave N $ 4,600,000 New Embassy;Suites -- Grading&Foundation Only -- 6300 Earle Brown $ 810,000 Dr Arena Learning Center -- 6415 Brooklyn Blvd 2008 F$l 4 053,999 New Embassy,Suites --6300 Earle Brown Dr 430,000 No. Mem. Interior Build-Out --4501 68th Ave N 2009 $ 900,000 Henn Cty Interior Finish -- 6601 Shingle Creek Pkwy $ 816,830 Luther Brookdale—Remodel -- 430168 th Ave N $ 3,975,850 Luther Brookdale—Addition -- 6701 Brooklyn Blvd $ 100,000 New Checker's Restaurant -- 615 66th Ave N $ 750,000 New Holiday Station Store' -- 5710 Xerxes Ave N $ 428,507 National American University -- Tenant Finish -- 6200 Shingle Creek Pkwy 2010 $ 1,200,000 Target Interior Remodel --6100 Single Creek Pkwy $ 500,000+ Gateway Commons Apts -- New Pool/Community Bldg $42,205,619 FBI Regional Office'-- 1501 Freeway Blvd $ 900,000 ITT Technical College -- Tenant Finish -- 6120 Earle Brown Dr $ 532,000 Home Depot Reg. Office -- 6120 Earle Brown Dr $ 276,350 Savvy Sherpa-Tenant Space -- 6200 Shingle Creek Pkwy 2011 $ 517,231 Evans Nordby Remodel—6000 Brooklyn Blvd $ 8,058,805 Luther Brookdale Toyota 6700 Brooklyn Blvd $ 7,955,330 Luther Brookdale Honda—6800 Brooklyn Blvd $13,461,699 Walmart— 1200 Shingle Creek Pkwy $ 225,000 AutoZone—6350 Brooklyn Blvd $ 875,000 Brown College Interior Finish—5951 Earle Brown Dr $ 935,000 Precision,Inc.'- 1700 Freeway Blvd $ 673,000 Link between Earle Brown Heritage Center and Embassy Suites Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 9 Foreclosures & Vacant Building Program With the high number of foreclosures experienced in Brooklyn Center, as well as the nation, the vacant building program ensures vacant properties are maintained. Vacant properties are risks of becoming targets for vandalism and illegal activity. Measures are in place to ensure properties are maintained in safe healthful conditions, do not become a public nuisance, and blight to the C neighborhood. In addition, staff identifies and refers properties for the ReMove and ReBuild program. These properties are life/safety hazards, distressed, unmarketable, or should be demolished. Elements of the vacant building program provide a mechanism to promote the community and these properties in partnership of the private sector, and promote reinvestment. Through monitoring and inspection program, the city's aging housing stock is improved for �+ vacant properties, supporting property values. I =. I the response and compliance with Accomplishments of the Vacant Building existing ordinances. Program • More than 141 water shut offs were performed at at-risk vacant properties. • While the number of vacant properties This has helped prevent health and safety has remained high, the number of hazards, property damage, and city water (Q complaints from residents has decreased. consumption, as well as reduces staff time Residents are proactive in monitoring and and resources to remedy inhabitable reporting nearby vacant properties conditions. through Vacant Watch. • Re-occupancy inspections are conducted o Vacant properties are identified more in a timely manner and correction orders quickly through coordination with other submitted within 48 hours. Flexible city departments and system processes. schedules allow time sensitive inspection o A higher number of vacant properties are requests and emergency response. being registered voluntarily and in a • Informational flyers are provided to timely manner. residents adjacent to vacant properties o Through city-facilitated abatements, and when a city-facilitated abatement has hazards and nuisance violations such as been conducted. junk, garbage, long grass/weeds, and unsecured property are addressed more promptly. This has had a significant Active Vacant impact at improving the appearance of vacant properties during the transitional Properties period. • Re-occupancy inspections ensure properties being reoccupied are in a safe '' condition and are more appealing to the prospective buyers and the neighborhood. f 340. 3920 • New policies and procedures were 320 356 0 implemented in 2010 to increase consistency and enforcement of the ' — building code. 2009 2010 • The implementation and use of Administrative Penalties has increased Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 10 Vacant Property 2009 2010 2011 Abatement orders 133 306 142 City-Facilitated Abatements 89 94 67 Notice to Register 393 310 396 Occupancy inspections 1248 _ 938 884 Vacant Building Registrations 437 312 399 Foreclosures The City of Brooklyn Center experienced over 1,600 foreclosures since 2006 which results in increased enforcement of the properties once they became vacant. Most properties are single family properties; however, some multi-family complexes have also been foreclosed. The following is a summary of foreclosures since 2006 in Brooklyn Center. Foreckimv and Vacant Property Statistics 2006 2007 _ 2008_ 2009 2010 2011 Foreclosures 135 254 418 298 287 246 Sheriffs Sales) Vacant N/A 101 394 438 847 884 Properties (Occurred throughout the year) Active Vacant as N/A —400 394 289 387 392 of 12/31 Vacant Watch is a program that makes neighbors aware of vacant properties in their neighborhood and engages them in the monitoring process to help prevent vandalism and blight. It is a collaborative effort with residents and neighbors of vacant property to monitor and report suspicious activities or nuisances. The City of Brooklyn Center has active neighborhood watch groups and involved residents and businesses. Proactive monitoring by the city has been conducted to identify vacant properties and eliminate problems. The City has implemented a Four-Step Foreclosure Strategy that includes: I 1. Data collection to identify the extent and severity of the problem. 2. Neighborhood stabilization including regular and ongoing surveys of neighborhoods and assuring property maintenance. 3. Prevention and intervention including promotion of education and counseling relative to foreclosure prevention. 4. Reinvestment returns foreclosed/vacant properties to occupancy and encourage homeownership. Building and Community Standards Department 201 1 Department Update Page I I Neighborhood Maintenance Proactive monitoring of the properties in neighborhoods and responding to complaints improves the conditions of the residential and commercial neighborhoods. Properties are reviewed for health/life safety hazards and public nuisances. Maintaining the housing stock and building 7` conditions also enhances the overall appearance of the neighborhoods to maintain and attract responsible homeowners and businesses. The sweep inspections are typically performed to �E address property code violations that are visible from the street or public area. 0 Accomplishments: • 27% of properties were found to have • Staff and residence have seen a positive one or more violation. 0 change in the neighborhoods where i properties are showing signs of Goals: 0 0 improvement. The goal for the 2012 sweep inspections will CL • Many problem properties were identified be to continue to make improvements to and compliance was met the neighborhoods and to see an increase • The efficiency of the inspections was in the number of properties that remain I increase through coordination with office in compliance. r-1® staff. Comparison of Cases and Violations •111 111 •111 111 4000 111 111 1000 1 11• 1 11 I • of • of lotions I A case is initiated when one or more violations occurs at a property and remains open until the property is brought into compliance. A case may have more than one violation as indicated by the chart. Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 12 Neighborhood Property Maintenance Enforcement Year No. of No. of No. of Abatement County Admin. Admin. Formal Com• laints Cases Violations s Citations Fines Hearini-s Complaints 2005 N/A 830 1011 N/A 1 N/A N/A 27 2006 N/A 868 1175 N/A 350 N/A �N/A 2 1 2007 N/A 1381 2557 N/A 342 N/A N/A 6 2008 N/A 2454 3355 259 214 N/A N/A 14 1 2009 N/A 2663 3885 257 i 66 N/A N/A 23 2010 1520 3073 3887 421 11 136 1 2 2011 802 3903 4601 399 1 665 22 2 I i Long Grass and Noxious Weeds Regulation For many people, long grass and weed violations are one of the most apparent and detracting public nuisances in a neighborhood. Based on citizen feedback and neighborhood review, in 2010 additional efforts were taken to streamline the regulatory process and more quickly identify and eliminate the blight caused by unmaintained yards. For many people, this is the most apparent and most detracting violation in a neighborhood. Mortgage foreclosures and vacant properties increased the number of long grass/weed violations. Accomplishments: • 329 city-facilitated grass abatements In 2010, the responsibility for administering occurred in 2011 compared to 175 in the long grass and weed program was 2010 and 163 in 2009. transferred to Building & Community • Depending on the growing season and Standards staff. Some efficiencies were inspection needs, staff is deployed from gained with coordination of property multiple programs to address the onset of maintenance efforts. For example, when a long grass/weeds. vacant property was identified with long J grass and junk outside, abatement orders I were issued and clean-up was conducted simultaneously. The following are some highlights of the long grass/weed program: • 1259 grass violations were found in 2011 compared to 911 in 2010 and 491 in ! 2009. 1 I Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 13 Number of • . Violations 2008 2009 2010 2011 April 0 0 1 1 May 125 134 277 466 June 195 125 227 312 July 77 73 189 312 August 104 117 144 205 September 94 41 52 194 October 22 0 19 72 Grass Violations By Month 500 - -- 400 - 300 - 200 100 or 0 April May June July Aug Sept Oct --2008 X2009 2010 2011 s Neighborhood Meetings provide opportunity to educate residents as well as learn from them. Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 14 �7 aQ *� Af A is n H c� O O ro _ co O4 to _3 �`�_ f✓d- _T �1 O 1 I �y vl � I This property was one of the first properties monitored under the vacant building program. The vacant property was purchased and improved by the new owner. New garage, new driveway, upgraded interior, etc. Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 15 Hazardous Property Demolition Id � r f {jJ t I E 3 dt � -f. w� '}9r• 1 � ,N f i The property had been vacant since the owner passed away and the lack of maintenance created structurally unsafe conditions. Though a court ordered abatement of the hazardous building staff were able to facilitate the demolition of the property. The demolition process opened the property up for potential redevelopment, improved the appearance of the neighborhood, and removed a safety hazard. Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 16 i Property Maintenance complaint/Administrative Citations M I a. I: - i After working with the property owner and providing a weather extension,the property owner failed to paint the property. The house had peeling paint. After voluntary compliance was not gained, administrative citations were issued and helped achieve compliance. After administrative citations were issued, the house was brought into compliance within three I weeks. j 1 Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 17 , Vacant Property Abatement for Long Grass & Weeds (Grass/Weeds over 8 inches and Noxious Weeds) Y. SSE r� rc i r` — 1 i ! I 1 1 Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 18 Vacant Property Abatement (Junk Vehicle, Garbage/Trash, Long Grass/Weeds, W. ti °yr. ' 1 . G - i i I I r I *After photo is of initial clean up. Maintenance violations to be repaired through registration process. Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 19 I__ Vacant Property Abatement j 1 r I I 011��%10�Ti' f I 1 1 1 *After photo are of initial clean up. Maintenance violations to be repaired through registration process. �_ Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 20 rl r C .. i 4rT kr Jii We 07/081201u P 10812010 11 26 r a r wAr m .. . APO'- f y ill. y.. P .r i Vacant Property Abatement City staff works with contractor to remove garbage,junk, equipment and Miscellaneous debris from property. fw i NI 11 4 F , 4. I j • i �_ Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 22 i Fire damage foreclosed Property i The City initiated hazardous building actions for the abandoned property that had incurred substantial fire damage that it was a hazard. Staff worked with the mortgage company to correct the hazards and public nuisance. Z i q. MR - + # 1 rt j i _ I Building and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 23 Registered Vacant Building Undergoing Rehab Staff monitored the property as a registered vacant building. Staff worked with the new owner ' and contractor to make repairs and for permit inspections. Many improvements are being made to vacant properties beyond those required by the minimums of the code. 1 i i R � Y I I I 1 1 r 1 a • y_ I d — _ IBuilding and Community Standards Department 2011 Department Update Page 24 Brooklyn Center –A Great Place to Start, a Great Place to Stay! 2011 Department Update Building & Community Standards Department April 23, 2012 City Council Meeting Presented by: Vickie Schleuning, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building & Community Standards Topics Department Overview-Mission and Goals • General Achievements • Program Summaries • Rental Program • Building Construction Inspections • Vacant Building Program • Neighborhood Maintenance • Photograph Examples • *Very brief summary of department activities City Council Meeting 04/23/122 Department Overview Clean, safe and attractive residential and commercial • neighborhoods are the foundation of a vibrant community. The Building & Community Standards Department, in conjunction with internal and external partners, works to ensure neighborhoods are clean, safe and attractive-a place where people want to live and do business. City Council Meeting 04/23/123 Department Goals In addition to the City Goals, department goals for doing • business are: Provide quality services in a responsive, customer oriented • and fiscally responsible manner. Increase the level of communication and public education • regarding building codes, property maintenance, housing, life and health safety, and general community standards. Implement activities that promote high standards for • residential and commercial properties, from the initial construction through the lifespan. City Council Meeting 04/23/124 General Achievements Customer Service • Use of technology to improve customer service • Added information to website • ePermits-certain types of construction permits • Request Tracker-online reporting system for property & • neighborhood concerns Additional handouts-rental, vacant building • City Videos-maintenance, waste disposal-CenterSpotlight • on website and Channel Twelve Attend Neighborhood Area Meetings • Association Responsible Management- • requested topics based on survey City Council Meeting 04/23/125 General Achievements Operations • Use of technology to improve efficiencies • GIS incorporation-mapping/clustering vacant building monitoring • and other property inspections In-field computers and printing for certain functions • Use of Laserfiche for record retention-space savings, uniform • location Upgrades to inspections database and other tracking systems- • building, rental and code enforcement Cross-training employees to handle workload spikes, shift • among program areas Use of seasonal employees • Developed development and construction project workflow for • internal and external customers-Also operational benefit City Council Meeting 04/23/126 General Achievements Financial Considerations • Cost of service calculations reviewed annually • License fees • Reinspection fees • City facilitated abatements service charges • Administrative penalty systems • Help recover city costs of providing service • City Council Meeting 04/23/127 General Achievements Continual Learning & Improvement • More sophisticated programs require higher performance • and training Internal and external training • Dangerous dog awareness-all employees invited plus • adjacent city employees Certification education • Nonprofit agencies-update staff about their programs, • allows better customer referrals Quality assurance measures • Consistency • Several policy, procedure and program manuals developed • City Council Meeting 04/23/128 Rental Licensing Program Higher percentage of Type I and Type II Rental Licenses • than anticipated based on initial data analysis Improved awareness • Shift in philosophy-ongoing maintenance versus how well • you repair violations Significant Renovations in apartment • complexes Gateway Commons-$3.5 million fall 2010 • (former Centerpointe Apts) Granite Peaks-$1/2 million Feb 2012 • (former Brookhaven) Many other improvements to rental • properties Granite Peaks Remodel 2012 (former Brookhaven) City Council Meeting 04/23/129 Rental And Section 8 Inspections 1200 1000 800 Rental Inspections 600 Section 8 Inspections 400 200 0 2005200620072008200920102011 City Council Meeting 04/23/1210 Rental Licenses Rental Properties Number of Licensed Rental Properties Rental Licenses By Category Number on:Single Multifamily since Family/Duplex January 1, 2008287- January 1, 2009321- Type IV –6 January 1, 201048975 Months, 20, Type III –1 January 1, 201147872 4% Year, 48, 10% January 1, 201256971 *Does not include pending licenses Type I –3 Year, 194, 42% Number of Rental Licenses by Category Type II –2 License Category20102011 Year, 208, 44% Type I –3 Year72194 Type II –2 Year77208 Type III –1 Year2748 Type IV –6 Months1320 City Council Meeting 04/23/1211 Construction Inspections Construction of FBI • Regional Headquarters completed in 2011 Construction of 189,580 • square foot Walmart facility Refer to page 10 • City Council Meeting 04/23/1212 Foreclosures & Vacant Buildings Four Step Foreclosure Strategy • Data Collection-Identification • Vacant Watch • Stabilization-monitoring, abatements • Reinvestment-ReNew, ReMove & ReBuild • Reoccupying safe, attractive properties • Responsible homeowners • City Council Meeting 04/23/1213 Foreclosure and Vacant Property Statistics 200620072008200920102011 Foreclosures 254418298287246 135 (Sheriff’s Sales) Vacant Properties 101394438847884 N/A (Occurred throughout the year) Active Vacant as of ~400394289387392 N/A 12/31 Vacant Property Activities 200920102011 Abatement orders133306142 City-Facilitated Abatements899467 Notice to Register393310396 Occupancy Inspections1248938884 Vacant Building Registrations437312399 City Council Meeting 04/23/1214 Foreclosures & Vacant Building Program 1400 1200 1000 800 2009 2010 600 2012 400 200 0 AbatementCity-FacilitatedNotice toOccupancyVacant Building ordersAbatementsRegisterInspectionsRegistrations City Council Meeting 04/23/1215 Property Maintenance Proactive residential and commercial neighborhood visits • Respond to complaints • Ordinances review and amendments • Public education • Community problem solving • Partner with nonprofit agencies-CEAP, HOME, Homeline, • etc. Overall significant amount of voluntary compliance • City Council Meeting 04/23/1216 Grass Violations By Property Maintenance Month 500 Statistics 400 300 200 100 0 AprilMayJuneJulyAugSeptOct 2008200920102011 Neighborhood Property Maintenance Enforcement Actions YearNo. of No. No. of AbatementsCounty Admin. Admin. Formal Complaintsof ViolationCitationsFinesHearingsComplaint Casesss 2005N/A8301011N/A1N/AN/A27 2006N/A8681175N/A350N/AN/A2 2007N/A13812557N/A342N/AN/A6 2008N/A24543355259214N/AN/A14 2009N/A2663388525766N/AN/A23 20101520307338874211113612 City Council Meeting 04/23/1217 2011802390346013991665222 Photograph Examples City Council Meeting 04/23/1218 Ensuring clean, safe and attractive neighborhoods where people want to live and do business. City Council Meeting 04/23/1219 Hazardous Property Demolition City Council Meeting 04/23/1220 Vacant Property Abatement City Council Meeting 04/23/1221 Long Grass/Weeds & Noxious Weeds City Council Meeting 04/23/1222 Vacant Property Abatement (Junk Vehicle, Garbage/Trash, Long Grass/Weeds City Council Meeting 04/23/1223 Long Grass/Weeds & Junk Abatement City Council Meeting 04/23/1224 City Council Meeting 04/23/1225 Fire Damage Foreclosed Property Worked with Mortgage Company City Council Meeting 04/23/1226 Registered Vacant Building Undergoing Rehab City Council Meeting 04/23/1227 Construction Projects City Council Meeting 04/23/1228 Department Staff Jesse Anderson, Housing & Community Standards Supervisor Rebecca Crass, Administrative Assistant Dan Jerzak, Property Code Specialist Sue Remjeske, Permit Technician John Rued, Building/Housing Inspector Eric Sonnenberg, Property Code Specialist Paul Swett, Building/Housing Inspector Vickie Schleuning, Director of Building and Community Standards City Council Meeting 04/23/1229 Questions? Thank you It is through the cooperation and contribution of department employees, other city departments, the City Manager, City Council, commissions, residents, businesses, community organizations and other various parties that the city goals and objectives are achieved. City Council Meeting 04/23/1230 City Council Agenda Item No. 7b I I i I� COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 17, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager f FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer )O U SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring May 20-26, 2012 Public Works Week in Brooklyn Center Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider adoption of a proclamation declaring May 20- 26, 2012 as Public Works Week in Brooklyn Center. Background: National Public Works Week is a celebration of the tens of thousands of men and women in North America who provide and maintain the infrastructure and services collectively known as public works. Instituted as a public education campaign by the American Public Works Association in 1960, the weeklong celebration calls attention to the importance of public works in community life. The week seeks to enhance the prestige of the professionals who serve the public good every day with quiet dedication. In 2012, we celebrate the contributions of public works professionals as well as the communities they serve. The Public Works Department employees 37 full time and 16 seasonal employees in the six divisions of the Department—Engineering, Street Maintenance, Parks Maintenance, Public Utilities, Capital Building Maintenance and the Central Garage. All divisions work together as a team to provide high-quality service for people who live,work, and visit Brooklyn Center. Many of the tasks like plowing streets, mowing parks, putting up signs, pumping water, maintaining large equipment and designing improvement projects are high profile. Many more tasks are completed almost unnoticeable except in their absence. Many people do not realize that significant efforts of the department take place while everyone else is sleeping. It is not unusual for street or park employees to get called out in the middle of the night after a storm to clear fallen trees from the road, or to plow or provide ice control during a winter storm, or utility employees to be called out to respond to a sewer backup or water main break. Our Public Works employees take great pride in their work. Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Council Goals: Strategic: 7. We will continue to maintain the city's infrastructure improvements Ongoing: 5. We will ensure the City drinking water is high quality and that the storm water is properly managed Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive connnuanitp that enhances the quality of life � fir all people and preserves the public trust PROCLAMATION DECLARING MAY 20-26, 2012 P UBLIC WORKS WEEK IN BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an integral part of our citizens' everyday lives; and WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as engineering, water, wastewater, storm drainage, streets and highways, parks, capital building maintenance and central vehicle fleet maintenance; and WHEREAS, the health, safety, and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities as well as their planning, design, and construction is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill ofpublic works personnel; NOW, THEREFORE, I, AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, State of Minnesota, with the consent and support of the Brooklyn Center City Council, do hereby proclaim May 20-26, 2012, as "National Public Works Week" in the City of Brooklyn Center, and I call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which public works personnel make every day to our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life. April 23, 2012 Date Mayor Council Members ATTEST.• City Clerk City Council Agenda Item No. 9a i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 18, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist THROUGH: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development ^ SUBJECT: Planning Application No. 2012-002 (Paul Hyde, Real Estate Recycling) Planned Unit Development(PUD) Rezoning—Setting a Public Hearing Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council, following consideration of Planning Commission Application No. 2012-002, submitted by Paul Hyde for a new PUD Rezoning, approve the 1St Reading of the attached ordinance amendment, and schedule the 2°a Reading and public hearing for May 14, 2012. Background: On April 12, 2012 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 2012-002 submitted by Paul Hyde of Real Estate Recycling for the rezoning of land located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North, from C-2 (Commerce) to a new PUD-MIXED C2/I-1 (Planned Unit Development-Mixed Commerce and Industrial Park). The Planning Commission considered the rezoning portion of this new PUD only, and delayed action on the final development/site and building plan until the April 26, 2012 meeting. At the May 14, 2012 public hearing date, the City Council will provide final consideration of this PUD rezoning and the related final development/site and building plans. The land use on the subject site (including the adjacent State of Minnesota/MnDOT parcel) was amended from "OS-Office/Service-Business" to Mixed-Use OS/I (Office-Service Business/Industrial) under City Council Resolution No. 2012-31, dated February 13, 2012, and was later accepted by the Metropolitan Council on March 13, 2012. Attached for review is Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-04, in which the Commission provided favorable recommendation of the rezoning. Excerpts from the April 12th Commission meeting minutes, as related to this consideration of this matter, are also attached. Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Council Goals: Strategic: 2. We will proceed aggressively with implementation of City's redevelopment plans. 4. We will improve the city's image. Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,sale,inclusive connuinio'.that enhances the quality of fife for all people and preserves the public trust CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 14 day of May , 2012, at . 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding the Zoning Classification of Certain land, generally located in the most southerly section of the City of Brooklyn Center, situated between Azelia Avenue North to the west, Lakebreeze Avenue North to the north, and HWY 100 to the east and south(addressed as 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North) Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the City Clerk at(763) 569-3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE MOST SOUTHERLY SECTION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, SITUATED BETWEEN AZELIA AVENUE NORTH TO THE WEST, LAKEBREEZE AVENUE NORTH TO THE NORTH, AND HWY 100 TO THE EAST AND SOUTH (ADDRESSED AS 4001 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE NORTH) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner: Section 35-1240. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD). The following properties are hereby established as being within a (PUD) Planned Unit Development District zoning classification: 8. The following properties are designated as PUD-MIXED C2/I-1 (Planned Unit Development-Mixed Commerce and Industrial Park): Lot 1,Block 1, Tennis Acres Two, Hennepin County, Minnesota. and That part of Tracts A and B described below: Tract A. That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Dale and Davies 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, 1 I i Minnesota embraced within Lot 8 Block 1 "Lakebreeze Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota", Tract B Lot 1 Block 1 Dale and Davies 2nd Addition except that part thereof embraced within Lot 8, Block 1, "Lakebreeze Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota", according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for said County; the title thereto being registered; which lies westerly of Line 1 described below: Line 1. Commencing at Right of Way Boundary Corner B 10 as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 27-125 as the same is on file and of record in the office of said County Recorder; thence westerly on an azimuth of 255 degrees 49 minutes 48 seconds along the boundary of said plat for 225.71 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B9 and the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 120 degrees 07 minutes 12 seconds for 131.00 feet; thence on an azimuth of 131 degrees 54 minutes 46 seconds for 121.95 feet (which course intersects the east line of Tract B hereinbefore described at a point thereon, distant 96.57 feet south of the northeast corner thereof); thence on an azimuth of 159 degrees 16 minutes 25 seconds for 36.98 feet; thence on an azimuth of 174 degrees 16 minutes 01 seconds for 37.02 feet; thence on an azimuth of 193 degrees 55 minutes 43 seconds for 39.03 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "A"; thence continue on an azimuth of 193 degrees 55 minutes 43 seconds for 33.68 feet; thence on an azimuth of 220 degrees 22 minutes 39 seconds for 66.89 feet; thence on an azimuth of 270 degrees 53 minutes 36 seconds for 6.25 feet to Right of Wayoundary Corner B7 as shown on said Plat No. 27-125• thence on an azimuth of 270 degrees 53 minutes 36 seconds along the boundary of said plat for 0.06 foot to the southeast corner of said Tract B, thence continue on an azimuth of 270 degrees 53 minutes 36 seconds along the boundary of said plat and the south line of said Tract B for 149.68 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B8 and there terminating. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty days following its legal publication. 2 ' i Adopted this day of , 2012. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (S'trikeou indicate matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) 3 Commissioner Parks introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-04 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-002 SUBMITTED BY PAUL HYDE OF REAL ESTATE RECYCLING, LLC, FOR THE REZONING OF LAND LOCATED AT 4001 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE NORTH FROM C2 (COMMERCE) TO PUD-MIXED C2/I-1 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT- MIXED COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK) WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012-002 submitted by Paul Hyde, on behalf of Real Estate Recycling, LLC proposes rezoning from C2 (Commerce) to PUD- Mixed C2/1-1 (Planned Unit Development — Mixed Commerce and Industrial Park) of the 7.39 acre site located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North, along with the approximate 1.27 acre MnDOT excess right-of-way parcel located adjacent to and immediately east of the subject property; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends the rezoning of the above mentioned property to facilitate the planned and future redevelopment of the site with a proposed 90,000 sq. ft. office/industrial/warehouse facility on said properties; and WHEREAS, on February 13, 2012, the City Council adopted City Resolution No. 2012-031 which approved an amendment to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan by changing the land use designation on the subject site from OS-Office/Service Business to a new Mixed-Use OS/I — Office-Service Business/Industrial; and whereby the City subsequently received official notice from the Metropolitan Council by means of letter of approval, dated March 13,2012 in which said land use amendment was accepted by the Met Council; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on April 12, 2012, whereby a planning staff report was presented and public testimony regarding the rezoning and development plan were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the rezoning request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezoning contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the C2 (Commerce) and I-1 (Industrial Park) Zoning District standards contained in Sections 35-322 and 35-330 of the City's Zoning.Ordinance, and the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn.Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2012-02 submitted by Paul Hyde of Real Estate Recycling, LLC be approved based upon the following considerations: PC RESOLUTION NO.2012-04 1. The planned rezoning is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance; 2. The rezoning,which will facilitate the redevelopment and improvement of this site, will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land; 3. The rezoning and utilization of the property as proposed under the planned redevelopment of this site is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with ordinance standards, in particular the incorporation of the 100 ft. and 50 ft. buffer requirements where industrial uses abut residential zoned property at a property line and a street line respectively; 4. The rezoning and land use amendment proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city; 5. The rezoning proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this proposed development can be considered an asset to the community; and 6. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating rezoning's as contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2012-002 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1) The rezoning is subject to the successful acceptance and approval by the City Council of the final development/site plan proposed for the subject site. 2) No part of the land may be used or developed under the site plan labeled "conceptual" until such time as the Applicant submits a separate site and building plan application. 3) The submittal and approval of the platting and combining of the former Northwest Athletic Club (Lifetime Fitness) parcel and the former Denny's Restaurant (now excess MnDOT right-of-way parcel), to a yet unnamed or identified subdivision plat. 2 of 3 PC RESOLUTION NO.2012-04 April 12,2012 Date Chair ATTEST:�-- Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kuykendall and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall and Parks and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 3 of 3 3rCEA"r--R•.� i OIi I,YN i Planning Commission Information Sheet Meeting Date: April 12,2012 Application Filed on 3-15-12 City Council action should be taken by 5-14-12 (60 Days) Application No. 2012-002 Applicant: Paul Hyde,Real Estate Recycling Location: 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue N. Request: Rezoning from C2 (Commerce)to PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 (Commerce/Industrial Park) INTRODUCTION Paul Hyde of Real Estate Recycling (RER) is seeking rezoning from C2 (Commerce) to PUD- Mixed C2/I-1 (Planned Unit Development-Mixed — Commerce & Industrial Park) of the old Northwest Racquet Club/Lifetime Fitness site, located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North. This new PUD rezoning will facilitate the redevelopment plans proposed by RER of a new 90,000 sf. office/manufacturing/warehouse facility on this site. A concept development plan is included as part of this report,but only serves as the preliminary plan for the final site and development plan to be considered on this redevelopment site. This is a public hearing, and notice has been published in the local newspaper and mailed to the surrounding property owners. BACKGROUND Prior to this rezoning, the City amended the current land use designation of this site, which was previously identified in the City's 201.0 Comprehensive Plan as OS-Office/Service Business. This City received approval from the Metropolitan Council to append this land use with a new "Mixed Use — OS/I (Office-Service Business/Industrial) land use category. Adding this industrial element to the underlying land use allows for the manufacturing and warehousing components of this new development to take place under the proposed PUD-Mixed zoning. The subject site consists of two vacant tracts of land; the first owned by Lifetime Fitness Corporation and the other the State of Minnesota. The larger tract is 7.4 acres in size and was formerly the Northwest Racquet and Tennis Club site. This property was acquired by Lifetime in 2006, which was subsequently demolished and cleared, and placed on the open market for sale. RER has a purchase agreement with Lifetime to acquire and develop this site should the city authorize this rezoning, along with a future site/building plan and platting applications. The smaller parcel located immediately east of the Lifetime site is approximately 1.27 acres in size and was the former Denny's Restaurant property, which was acquired by MnDOT as part of the reconstruction of the TH 100 project in 2003. This remnant parcel added to the larger Lifetime site would provide 8.67 acres of total area. PC 04-12-12 Page 1 r C''7BR The City has an agreement with the State of Minnesota/MnDOT to transfer this parcel to the City, whereby the City intends to transfer the same parcel over to RER. The subject site 1 s surrounded by I-2 Heavy Industry zoning ng to the north; R4 Multiple Family Residence to the northwest; R2 Two Family Residence to the west; and R5 Multiple Family Residence to the southwest. The I-2 zone is virtually filled-in with existing office/warehouse developments. The R4 area consists of a number of 4-plex apartment buildings interspersed with single-family homes. The R2 zone to the west consists•of a number of single-family homes with two-family(duplex)homes; while the R5 zone contains the Twin Lake Apartment complex. During preliminary testing and soil investigations of the subject site, RER discovered some potential volatile organic compounds and petroleum compounds which may require soil clean up and remediation work. Some of this contamination may have been a direct result of the former Joslyn Pole Yard Manufacturing (wood treatment) site to the north. The City, in conjunction with RER has applied for grants through the Department of Employment and Economic Development and Met Council's Tax Base Revitalization programs to assist in funding a Phase II Site Investigation Work Plan. On December 16, 2011, the City was notified by DEED that we received a$50,000 grant to assist in the investigation of contaminants on the subject site. Once the clean-up plan is approved, RER plans to redevelop this site with the new 90,000 sq. ft. office/industrial/warehouse facility mentioned previously. The site and building plan and replat of the two parcels will be considered under separate planning applications'at a future Planning Commission meeting. REZONING The redevelopment of this site hinges upon the successful rezoning of the parcels, and is subject to the "Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines" contained in City Code Section 35- 208 (attached) and the procedures outlined in City Code Section 35-210. The applicant has submitted a written narrative describing their proposal along with written comments relating to the Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines (attached). As with all rezoning requests,the Planning Commission must review the proposal based on these evaluation policies and guidelines contained in the zoning ordinance. The policy generally states that rezoning classifications must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and shall not constitute"spot zoning", which is defined as a zoning decision which discriminates in favor of a particular land owner and does not relate to the Comprehensive Plan or accepted planning principals. Each rezoning proposal must be considered on its merits and measured against the City's policy and against the various guidelines, which have been established for rezoning review. The following is a review of the rezoning guidelines contained in the zoning ordinance as we believe they relate to the applicant's comments and their proposal: PC 04-12-12 Page 2 X CT fTL'R a. Is there a clear and public need.or benefit? It is staff s opinion that this redevelopment proposal can be seen as meeting a clear and public need or benefit if it is consistent with the redevelopment criteria established by the City.and is also consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The redevelopment proposed by Mr. Hyde will provide a nice and attractive balance to the overall business needs of the community and the other needs of adjoining properties. The redevelopment will provide an increase to the tax base in the community and may provide full-time employment opportunities to the residents. Addressing the clean-up of polluted soils that can pose a risk to health and the environment is an obvious public benefit and creating jobs on a site that is vastly underutilized. The proposal addresses the public needs and benefits in a way that makes it possible for the developer to do so in an economically feasible manner. The proposal they have is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan which is basically silent as to the future development of this site or this area of the city. The property is currently zoned C2 (Commerce) in an area that is heavily influenced by other industrial and similar uses, and surrounded by single family and multiple-family housing. The industrial and residential uses in this area have been developed and zoned this way for a number of years, and all uses appear to function and co=exist together nicely. The proposed PUD-Mixed C24-1 zoning will provide for an effective and legal means of allowing this "clean" and less intensive industrial use in this area. Under the PUD agreement to be determined later, the City and Applicant can develop a plan that incorporates certain uses, standards or regulations that normal zoning district do not provide. The Applicant intends to correct and clean-up the polluted soils are-currently affecting or impacting this site, which represents a significant risk to human health and the environment. The site currently vacant brings zero jobs and minimal tax base to the site. Redevelopment will remove the pollution, clean up the blighted site and bring jobs and higher tax base to the neighborhood. b. Is the proposed zoning consistent and compatible with the surrounding land use classifications? The Applicant notes that the proposed zoning will be a less intensive classification rather than the current C-2 zoning designation, or the I-2 Zoning to the north. The applicant's proposal certainly is consistent with the uses north of Lakebreeze Avenue in the Twin Lakes Business Park, which coincidentally, has been developed by the applicant. The proposed office/warehouse use would essentially mimic the Caribou Coffee facilities located to the north, which could be considered compatible with the surrounding residential uses. PC 04-12-12 Page 3 X q•n! KLYN TER Staff would comment that the proposal should remain consistent and compatible with surrounding land, use classifications from the standpoint that the proposed PUD Mixed C2/I-1 zoning is less intensive than the existing zoning and the'use can co-exist with abutting properties provided appropriate screening and buffering is maintained and other requirements of the district are maintained as well. c. Can all proposed uses in the proposed zoning district be contemplated for development of the subject property? The applicant comments that the proposed zoning district will result in a less intensive use at the site. They point-out that office/warehouse use is consistent with surrounding uses and will provide additional jobs and tax base to the neighborhood. They believe the addition of an attractive new building will clean up the vacant site and remove pollution. Staff concurs with the Applicant's comments that the proposed C2/I-1 mixed zoning can be viewed as less intensive district for the site. Of note should be that outside storage of inventory, work in process or other materials would not be allowed in this site. The less intense nature of the industrial uses and commercial uses allowed under the C2/I-1 zoning, along with the PUD provisions to be established afterwards will provide for agreed-upon uses which would be appropriate for this area. d. Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in this area since the subject property was zoned? From all accounts of previous zoning records and land use maps,the zoning and land use in this area has remained virtually unchanged throughout the years. The nearest zone change took place a few years ago on the former Howe Fertilizer site (4821 Xerxes Avenue)to the east,which was modified from I-2 to PUD/I-1 in February 2008. The overall effect proposed zoning change of this property with the new PUD-Mixed, even with the retention of the C2 category and addition of the I-1 category, is minimal and can be considered an appropriate change. Appropriate screening and buffering will be provided to the residential areas, and the intended use of this property for light industrial purposes makes this a reasonable and allowable use. Having the site consistent with the development to the north will create a positive impact on the City. e. In the case of City initiated rezoning proposals, is there a broad public purpose evident? This evaluation criteria is not applicable in this case because this is not a City initiated rezoning proposal,but rather a developer initiated proposal. L Will the subject property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed zoning district? The redevelopment plans and proposed rezoning with the Mixed C2/I-1 district standards must adhere to the guidelines and general standards set forth in both districts. Even PC 04-12-12 Page 4 c;q 0' RRO0ICI,S'N CENTER though the C2 standards are less restrictive than the I-1 zone(e.g. the buffer requirements from adjacent residential areas), the Applicant has agreed to provide or adhere to the higher standards under the I-1 Zone. All building setbacks and parking and loading areas will meet I-1 setbacks and full buffer, screening and landscape measure will be included. Staff will ensure that an appropriate buffer between the single family residences to the west and this site will be provided, and that traffic issues will be addressed as part of any future considerations or conditions of approvals. The proposed PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 offers an ideal opportunity to provide effective and appropriate uses,which should be consistent with the general principles and policies established under the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area. Proper screening and buffering will further provide an acceptable relationship between these areas. g. Is the subject property generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present zoning district with respect to size, configuration,topography or location? In initial discussions with the Applicant, the original site was p lanned for a change from C-2 to I-2, which was consistent with the I-2 zoning to the north. Although this I-2 area that encompasses Twin Lake Business Park is a nicely developed and clean area, the concept or allowances of outdoor storage under a similar I-2 zone for this site was determined to be inappropriate. Staff encouraged, and Mr. Hyde agreed, to limit the overall allowances or permitted activities on this site by requesting a specific PUD-Mixed Use with limited C2/I-1 uses. The development plans in general seem to provide a good layout and site plan for this area. The applicant's proposal to use this site for the office/warehouse use more than fits and utilizes the land respectfully by incorporating parking along the front edges of the site; loading to the rear; and appropriate landscaping and screening/buffering along the westerly boundaries to the residential areas. h. Will the rezoning result in an expansion of a zoning district warranted by: 1. Comprehensive Planning; 2.Lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district, or; 3. The best interest of the community? This rezoning application under consideration will result in the expansion of a portion of a zoning district warranted by the current Comprehensive Plan. This warranting was created by the recent adoption of the land use change by the City and acceptance of said comprehensive plan amendment by the Met Council. The redevelopment of this site will not "greatly" expand an already existing and successful industrial based area,; moreover, it will upgrade the current C-2 site to a reasonable and more appropriate mixed use with C2/I-1 zoning uses and standards. This rezoning will result in higher quality jobs and increase in tax base and a less intensive use of the site. In general we would concur with these comments and note that the proposal does appear to have merit beyond just the particular interests of the developer and should lead to a PC 04-12-12 Page 5 X Cl% redevelopment that should be considered consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses. As mentioned previously, the proposal can be considered in the best interests of the community noting particularly the clean-up of a polluted site and a relatively clean development. i. Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an individual parcel? As indicated previously, the Applicant is currently in the process of remediating polluted soils on this site, which may pose a risk to human health and environment. The site in its current condition is vacant and clearly underutilized, producing minimal jobs and tax base. The Applicant's redevelopment of this site will provide an opportunity to clean up the pollution and add high quality jobs and tax base to the site which results in merit beyond the interests of only the current owner. We also believe that the proposal has merit beyond just the particular interests of the developer. It will lead to a development that can be consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses. The-proposal would provide a quality development that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and be considered in the general best interests of the community. PROCEDURE Minnesota State Statute requires the City to respond to zoning applications within a 60-day time limit from the day a properly submitted application has been filed with the City. This application was filed on March 15, 2012. Due to legal notice and publication requirements for zoning requests, the application needs to be submitted at least four weeks prior to the Planning Commission's public hearing. The review clock began on the date the application was accepted. Therefore, the zoning decision must be made by the City Council no later than May 14, 2012, which is when the 60-day review period ends. Should the Planning Commission or City Council elect to table or postpone this decision, an additional 60-day review period would be necessary. Under this PUD application, the rezoning was accompanied by a proposed development/concept plan. This plan is only conceptual, and serves as an illustrative precursor to the .future final development/site plan,which must be approved with all new PUD's. This final development/site plan is scheduled to be considered before the Planning Commission at the April 26, 2012 meeting. Please note the rezoning element of this PUD may proceed on its own merits;however, upon the final PUD consideration by the City Council, the rezoning and site plan will be considered together as one complete planned unit development proposal. A public hearing has been scheduled and notices have appeared in the Brooklyn Sun/Post and notices have been sent to neighboring property owners. The Planning Commission, following the public hearing may wish to consider a draft resolution, which has been prepared for consideration. The draft resolution outlines various possible findings with respect to the request to change the current zoning on the subject site from C2 (Commerce) district to PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 (Commerce/Industrial Park), with certain conditions noted therein and in the following PC 04-12-12 Page 6 X K I,YN TER recommendation heading. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission provides a recommendation to the City Council to approve Planning Commission Application No. 2012-002, which comprehends the rezoning of the subject site noted herein from C2 (Commerce) district to PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 (Commerce/Industrial Park), subject to the following conditions: 1) The rezoning is subject to the successful acceptance and approval by the City Council of the final development/site plan proposed for the subject site. 2) No part of the land may be used or developed under the site plan labeled "conceptual"until such time as the Applicant submits a separate site and building plan application. 3) The submittal and approval of the platting and combining of the former Northwest Athletic Club (Lifetime Fitness) parcel and the former Denny's Restaurant (now excess MnDOT right-of-way parcel), to a yet unnamed or identified subdivision plat. If the Planning Commission accepts this recommendation and the conditions listed herein,the Commission may elect to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-04, which memorializes the findings in granting this rezoning, and provides for the conditions of approval as they relate to this approval. PC 04-12-12 Page 7 Ci" BROOKLI%V CENTER Section 35-208. REZONING EVALUATION POLICY AND REVIEW GUIDELINES. 1. Purpose The City Council finds that effective maintenance of the comprehensive planning and land use classifications is enhanced through uniform and equitable evaluation of periodic proposed changes to this Zoning Ordinance; and for this purpose, by the adoption of Resolution No. 77-167,the City Council has established a rezoning evaluation policy and review guidelines. 2. Policy It is the policy of the City that: a) zoning classifications must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and b) rezoning proposals shall not constitute "spot zoning", defined as a zoning decision which discriminates in favor of a particular landowner, and does not relate to the Comprehensive Plan or to accepted planning principles. 3. Procedure Each rezoning proposal will be considered on its merits, measured against the above policy and against these guidelines which may be weighed collectively or individually as deemed by the City. 4. Guidelines a. Is there a clear and public need or benefit? b. Is the proposed zoning consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classifications? C. Can all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district be contemplated for development of the subject property? d. Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the subject property was zoned? e. In the case of City-initiated rezoning proposals, is there a broad public purpose evident? f. Will the subject property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed zoning districts? g. Is the subject property generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present zoning district,with respect to size,configuration,topography or location? h. Will the rezoning result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by: 1) Comprehensive Planning; 2)the lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or 3)the best interests of the community? i. Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an individual parcel? City of Brooklyn Center City Ordinance I I Vt, Real Estatee Recycling Former Lifetime Site Redevelopment Narrative Rezoning Evaluation and Review Background: The majority of the Site was vacant property or used for periodic farming of an undefined nature. Aerial photographs suggest some type of large garage or storage building located near the southwest corner of the Site in late 1940'3, which was gone by the early 1950's. The Lifetime Health Club (constructed under a previous name) was constructed in 1984 and 1985. It was a two story structure that had an elevator and swimming pool and hot-tubs. The facility had tennis and other racquet sport courts and locker/shower rooms. The Lifetime Health Club was demolished in 2007 and the Site has been un-used and vacant since that time. The demolition included all aboveground structures and reportably included all foundations associated with the Lifetime site. A water well was abandoned in 2007, according to City records, although no records of well installation or abandonment were found in the Hennepin County well database. Most of the Site was low lying, at an elevation approximately the same as the wetland areas near-by the Site and associated with Middle Twin Lake which is located approximately 1000 feet directly west of the Site. The Site was located in a rural area until residential properties started being developed in the 1950's. An exception to this is the Joslyn Manufacturing site that was located approximately 300 feet north of the Site as early as the 1930's until the 1980's. The low lying area was filled, through some on-Site grading as well as import of undocumented fill to the Site. The filling started in the late 1940's, when the adjacent Highway 100 was started, and continued into the 1970's and 1980's. i The undocumented fill was sampled in the summer of 2011. Based on the eight soil borings, urban fill soils are present across the entire Site to a depth at or below the water table which exists 10 to 12 feet below ground surface. The fills include debris such as asphalt, concrete, plastic, metal, organics, peat and glass. One soil sample of urban fill was collected and analyzed for semi-volatile organics (PAH's or poly-aromatic hydrocarbons) and for petroleum, as defined by the MPCA required analysis of Diesel Range Organics (DRO). The PAH's were detected at a concentration approximately twice the industrial standard (Soil reference Value (SRV)) for BaP equivalent and the DRO was detected at 245 mg/kg, a concentration that the Petroleum Brownfields Program (PBP)will require some response action and soil management actions. Development Plan: Development plans for the.Site after clean-up entail a variety of benefits for the community. The 90,000 square foot, multi-tenant, light-industrial project (called France Avenue Business Park Building IV)to be developed by Real Estate Recycling is just across the street from the former Joslyn site redevelopment known as France Avenue Business Park. The redevelopment of the former Joslyn site resulted in a 3 building, 400,000 square foot business park featuring some of the great Minnesota companies, including Toro, Caribou Coffee's world headquarters and Wagner sprayers. The proposed Building IV on the former Lifetime site would reduce a human health and safety risk to the neighborhood, eliminate blight from the Site, bring jobs to the area and generate property tax revenues for the City and County. Real Estate Recycling is marketing the project to firms who are growing and want to stay in the area, and to firms currently outside the area who might be brought in by new construction and easy access to Highway 100 and public transportation. There has been very strong demand for the proposed 90,000 square foot France Avenue Business Park Building IV. Real Estate Recycling is currently negotiating with two different companies to take space in the proposed building. The first company is a medical device company looking for 65,000 square feet for office, lab and warehouse. They need to be in the new building by Fall of 2012 and are attracted to its location as they are re-locating from New Brighton. In addition Real Estate Recycling is negotiating with publicly traded company in the medical supply business for 25,000 square feet of office, lab and climate controlled warehouse space. They need to be in the new building by Fall of 2012 and are attracted to its location as they are re-locating from Crystal. PUD Proposal: The proposed plan requests the creation of a PUD with an combination of a C-2 and 1-1 zoning classification (the site is currently zoned C-2). This use will be less-intensive than the previous retail use, and will provide significant increase in tax base and jobs to the area. RER requests the creation of a PUD to allow flexibility in the medical uses at the Site. RER will incorporate heavy landscaping on the west side of the property to screen the abutting residential area from the building. Specifically, the dock area will be screened from the neighboring residences with attractive opaque landscaping. This screening will effectively block lights from the building and vehicle traffic, ensuring that neighboring residences will not be disturbed. The building and all proposed parking will be within the current setback requirements. In addition to screening, RER's proposed plan mitigates any car or truck traffic associated with the redevelopment. The proposed site plan keeps all traffic off Azelia Ave to the west. This is a significant compromise in that this proposed site plan is 35,000 sf smaller than the original plan submitted by RER in the Fall of 2011. The net economic impact of the shrinking of the size of the original building is over$2 million in the value of the completed building. Additional signage will be installed at the northwest entrance to identify the residential neighborhoods on 48th street and prohibit truck traffic in the area. The current proposed building size and layout accomplishes an attractive front facade that faces the higher traffic counts on Highway 100, the front door to Brooklyn Center. This plan ties into the France Avenue Business Park to the North, creates a dock area effectively screened from residential, and includes building floor plate depth that is supported by the market. Rezoning Guidelines: i Is there a clear and public need or benefit? Yes. Polluted soils are currently uncapped, representing a significant risk to human health and the environment. The vacant site generates 0 jobs and minimal tax base. Redevelopment will remove the pollution, bring jobs and tax base as well as successful companies, to the neighborhood. Is the proposed zoning consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classifications? Yes. The proposed PUD will be comprised of the existing C-2 and an 1-1 zoning classification which is less intensive than the current 1-2 designation across the street. This use is consistent with the uses across at the France Avenue Business Park, and far more compatible with surrounding residential uses than the heavy traffic generated by the former health club. ,I Can all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district be contem p lated for develo p ment of the subject property? Yes. The proposed zoning district will result in a less-intensive use at the site (down zoning from C-2 to C-211-1). The office/warehouse use is consistent with surrounding uses, and will provide additional jobs and tax base to the neighborhood. The addition of an attractive new building will clean up the blighted site and remove the pollution. Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the subject property was zoned? Yes. On the north side of the Lifetime Site the redevelopment of the former Joslyn Site dramatically changed the surrounding uses from a former polluted, heavy industrial wood treating facility to a modern, 400,000 square foot industrial park that is now home to some of Minnesota's greatest companies, including Toro, Caribou Coffee and Wagner Spraytech. I . I In the case of City-initiated rezoning proposals, is there a broad public purpose evident? Not applicable. Will the subject property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed zoning districts? Yes. A PUD is proposed with an underlying 1-1 zoning classification. The development will adhere to the guidelines set forth in the PUD. There are no variances from the underlying 1-1 zoning requested. Is the subject property generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present zoning district, with respect to size, configuration, topography or location? Yes. The present zoning district is C-2, which allows for commercial uses. Since the creation of the new Highway 100 interchange at Lakebreeze Ave, there site is no longer suitable for commercial uses. This is evidenced by the fact that the Lifetime has been unable to sell the site since site was listed for sale just after the creation of the new Hwy 100 interchange. Will the rezoning result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by.• 1) Comprehensive planning, 2) The lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or 3) The best interests of the community? The redev elopment will result in a mixed C-2/ 1-1 zoning district, which is a less intensive industrial use than the neighboring 1-2 classification. This rezoning will result in higher quality jobs, an increase in tax base, and less intensive uses at the site. Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an individual parcel? The polluted soils currently pose a risk to human health and the environment. In addition, the site in its current condition is blighted and underutilized, producing minimal jobs and tax base. Redevelopment will clean up the pollution, and add high quality jobs and tax base to the Site, results which demonstrate merit beyond the interests of the current owner. i I I y � � ..W Y , C 's' � ,�. *�`' � _' fi "ssa.;ww; ` u � " ��. �,ul� •� ��ul'�t','�u��sx� � ,,;^*,-y,-r t474'^�-•�.r..-."e1�4''�Ls� � I,��� n�r _ V�Gp� J.��•yT t!.,�a'� r M u- y^tr a�.�-. .� d' ?�. �.'�j� �.-"�-"' '� ��i 4 e �"iS"'t�z` a'�",r �� � - .,,. T,� i y IM 11 1 f i✓ N NS �� k �� �tl,' ��'t$ $ �w,. Y r,x, Former Northwest Athletic Club Site '� T, a K �A,,K-,F-SIDE- VE N �- t9 mss, , n rvr ,x ��1�� { y��"y6° Y..'�""i'• #s,.c:. � 'Y^•�; c•rtct�'rt�. t x?xt� N, .�;a��!%SIy��r: r�_l:k�,;,l,?:d�� �sr. PROPERTY INFO •., Northwest Athletic Parcel= 7.4 acres T(excess)Pa r cel=1.27 27 acres a r+ ZONING:C-2 Commerce 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North PID:11-011-82-13-10-029 OWNER: LTF Real Estate Company,Inc. 2902 Corporate PI Chanhassen,MN 55317 0 25 50 100 150 200 Feet LAKE 9REELEAVE.N I I I \•� I I I • s` �� — I I I —T -- 5D' I I I I I � I I I OFFlCEIWAREHO+E 730' �VIWQCIDJ4DW I 14_�ye• `V RETENTION '--•�--•—�•—�.---. o• o POND I o ps TOTAL GROSS sq.R:89,488 PARKING SPACES SHOWN:260 o PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 0 65,000 z6 @ vj000-130 25,000 zf.@ 125 North 0 02-20-2012 @ OPUS. Industrial Warehouse Brooklyn Center 0 50 100 Zoo Opus Architects & Engineers, Inc. Brooklyn Center, MN Site Plan Option 6 0c, e 'P-F LOA]Ltll — �'�.wn'1�>o _ 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I�'� Cam"`m.m� A•R'°w __ I PARCEL 1: POB I L4(� —— _—— —— —�—•_———— — ^` w •n„W m' '�• wr ap Lat t,glark t Tannin Acroz Tn4 H-P.plo Cv ty..Mlnnazoly. �,/J unm S,p,__ * �� ,' _rte`— _R vaem___ (T ne Pwpertr:Cartlllcate or INv Na 1106947) P00 w1E 1- a-R2 . � PMCEL 2 III-- ' —T------- — ly,.r� � % _� / Paste f � ,aR.aar 4 1 I I �--�-"-�I—T �————'—� / q°n-eNduelro v°rMnq aneemanle oarspad or L°I.1 d],pladt I,Je,lp,s.°,na J/ \ 4d tlmll.n,Nwn,pN Caunly,Ml—j` z.t rorlh In pNarollon or C--b and Ii I H is '--LL's^'�� ' "'�`!w+s�Y�� --•�"?�I JT�, ----- ---� paa4lpllana^carded ve Ooc"menlrNUmba 9]S]21e a dea E t".Cvn,viha ii I it ' I- r 'iI ` `')� I '}.�1\11,1 I,LI_(.'_I,pfd(x�.l.,J,•I I I I I lil{� �i1�� / edamllm ce d,da ponumznt u par 6>00.0R'antla lurNar omand°d by lhz I � I� I �%'hal°M�x�('y°L�•(�f}, �.'.(�IGP:�[,,(v/F T��) "("�• ILIJI '_IN' / Am,ndm,nt b Oadawliw r Lonnmt,vnd Relrielivm ncaN,d az pvwm•nl Numbm }}I ,r °% ,vvu�ne -- �I' �'•., t\ >19{799. tl in Ne o/Rcv of Cwnt Rarnrder, 00x^ "x oc xaue°°"waio I, �`4 I NN[,l-�,^V"O•'•„�, Oi o H ' Imo_ $ .]x` � �`+-©ore r..we•awarr.� ' // Hwn°Dln Cwnly,Minneavl4 Y mxm % ��✓r'���~�'� ^°�_—�r•� r (AbsWCI DwPer1Y) i° ' !/ ,.5.917 � / = iz-•� fea 1®" >amw ° 1 -�" m° ���N\I• ° °° / nagCS°ISdvNVO°�1 Mt5-me"ilw-t Jun:a�2aii.ro--oo .Py me no. sry caRMER dosLlii SECpRy omr] 1 ^a\_�— },a,>,�,mpvr;;.^;?�f�z_'vx..x TM 1�'s`11 .tea,e�-�,• "n.a. w , V^_°-�, / 1 \ � O"a,,ve *f l ^m„�, STATEMENT OF ENCROACHMENTS: {gyp -�_)�� ,� �1„,�—�.mv._". i '1-�,'°m,x°ed;o'er,n / Iml 000 x. J` _=.F- - 3- '" =. 'as�.an>y�,. _,,,,(! _ ,m _ I_—, ,L_�___ - I / I rP,wgl". -r•'1-' _ I— ''�- - i-r _ --K” —`II \ i 1/ ��voc ` •b 9L--lv.nv°°nD.n..m,rl..,.r (v.�.,uP tuv..eax.o. •L I _ >.,.� r � '�° \ / ¢mna..".m°.bl«..°m...n,.I".e.b.w and vm,...r...,,. ' .R`F'°tea—-x� ,_°—— ©Pm,.°m?�.Nw�c,wmma �Ca ^----"-- .^m* ;°�q- —gds•-m.>.o_.b.�or .°T w�' dp � ,� "�`��I>•va.�.n.,i:r o.W,Lwmu:°�rn.,,o«la,m mom. _ yw.wn 'wv,.a xewlu e.'Mn...d o yv. '�—h'„9•L'—,pv�.� `�-�— - ..A'Pi.� / Teez� s9�n'ati'",ro,rrnm�ur w' '°'`-—,^•..- � ,�r` v._r��°°.-r�+am mermM1 D..1 e>IM aeurY�t WaNO .�y'.'�•�='�--''�. e -_°� _ a , 6AKe €z€ar;�Ve uN -�c-°" ,�'`��.°°`M1a .�•"�-"�°ia�vr .,4°,.�.",r�,>m.�wc,a a,d m wnunx - '• , - ...^ � � = o - _ m>°eci w(;dP>m �", -^��_•evs.l p �i.:"�°�.r m`,.°":am x....n� /�6 i iy,�ry\(� � ,r=_� \\r � u t�r�`a�✓a y.—1'Y'�r °--��,�� .r�'-; a� ..e..._eae2 "v..°��v.•ae°�° / r.,e�.o.,r m. a�Vii; / ) y �� ° I ,v� s l r� ,� .�en'� e \�-�-�-�� 1 �,,?A�-'yP=--k��` -rt,�r ?r• f \.a °I��,.. x.�° /' GENERAL NOTES: nh°' —�w � n 'I 13 n am_m �m' mrob"64` s \\. �N"Nars +r`. a°rd \�° ♦° T__T.._ ` a:oe°.a� mxnemerwwa..fio•a"mx w ..n.N. m.w..xwwrroNz `'/ 11( ,ri` , ,y -- < N a>r\ ♦ `� �> v r we uu..r nut.,d-ocw.mo.roµ>auN.ao.. Cd,%, i I lllj y� r i.a"S- � , +fi�-mT�ii�.r'wa, ,�p�a�; 1� -arol£is .x 'x� _._�:ie,.-f" 'r�.l_.-'„3�-ars- a�.kluer'°°.u»,a.,an,m.a..s.MH�.c°u�....s•.�n.e�n...,v nm.N.x.. ♦/ r a > N 1 \ r i aH r-r r i �fy t w I.a e,��.n..a x°a. 5 d r 9 „ i i�l ' �orz°"m° a amr Ar wa we Lc I r ) I Y P e r-= a�x.aaa. ypcppu ,d 1 \ v r ..-_ 30 23 O 30 100 I30 ”'t"°�">-"°°"Ot°1•`Hla.Im mM Ham.V.�w.�t I•rm.A p.n.,.e4 amp� a ii °� m°.) I `,__ ���5� I °f3 o-J! v' y\ \ _ �° 4mn. .,:t.m.. r.t-ae.. �i �' I°VIII 1 j 1"�••'a\ `\ x-- ' V .Jvr , x,� au>��lP\♦\"�@1♦I T SCALE IN FEET t0. v,.,°a,vawa,.nM.lm..,.aa w•>.,Y,er.na�n.n..°anvmw I II° ( I I \ �e ♦ _v"'�' \ 1 L y (1,�\\\\i- 1 °P / vc SCALE I INCH m 50 FEET .° ....,wx.ner.vy.d,.u,v aw a ra n.oN.xn.r.mw.m....x a..yam °°i\j" I. �. ,xa' \ ) 4Q 1 ^� - .d`9 - I,II ' .@7 sP'N F 1 \\\�) ¢ - w.e.n.,�mmm.d r.mdr mn»nNw. ?1 r \\r�; I \ >A` . 1.� S` .. � ♦ (�6♦\\\���r �avnm' n"w'�: NuH°.w.�..n r.wv.n�,..r anv -- E�> � ?iil" a -`� \ < -�e1-`. ♦ ""err w'r"�r �'�trDeixa.'r.. x� \ \a�i((\711 1.'"ry�N.:ea:.> �U .a P}t1REIp 1` ,�' J\ I e S°. .. .,mva. Ix I�.. 3r bd'�:;,.^,.,";°,:mmr:d v°"r-iu�m: a�.xN°,.Na,.n.m maa..°.,m A.we.,,.,,. p`• '"��" --- '�' . 1 c r' a'�`��,\°\I).1� ,r 6."..x°"°b:;�r."t'.r'.".mn n"'.�,aa: �� x11 : rs + `. \ y 1q\\\ Il .b>u° �.a .,..d4 0. mtr.n°. I I mom">mm,xm xaun °:1„�ulr°',u,�.I..,A.,.a ) 1 �'(I � i �7SBLlILDIIV � ON SITE`-�- Y '+ ° °u,°p�°q��a >� i � ,yN 1�\ II 1 __- ��� `��'�� nro,;,""^'t4r �' '4r M re.'""�e°.":-aiw aa'°'Nn:::l>a...mom!a.°��N'u°°,.i, w.w N.da,n;,,me ——= tc$J 1117 --aop i 1 df a aP qr)r n �^� m.N.d N.n°-xx°°r VP ( � � \ ( -i,---- �; I u 'v.a'°vie rw ui is°".aa.�., ee�r, wi°d� r �j7 _ 4�' `. \ i a @4, sac ypr� °d m wa'T°e .e.n°N .m..m.!a aww m M.!s a ., n11� ) I I `♦ ,per� ',!d?`�-�'"_ \ ,�"dT „ar`,K *r� ,Fr ,p\♦ yririr NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B: �.�,n e.°l��o��me�:���,xq `.�,.. �1 i�I \�s_ _� :� ,I�1, ♦♦ 1 rr ,ar' ,d' m�NV.--cats]t 4ifri Q�p:q��ra°,">e:>'I.H'°�'ma a"a:.M.m..a w,t.r r n..0 x A '�-I I _-- ",7 `�'`� N� \ 1 1 r a(, 6f04 •?�,,tx(� �a m°nx al wY .w.w.r Ru..(.�r v°ai o. —°° \, -v�n ilk ,a /�( .�\`- '' 0.� \♦ \`IPI�� \. 3c (r '-'ca°�m°a'' °°.n �i�uunrmr' a.°m°iivawii°.apw a°e� ewu:° ®4..POm�..mn_;, 91, i�i ,P'P > '(-II\ ,r \ iTjiij 1. ,eai.:i el ^� r� ' °..e>N: -.,�o..°...,,.�,x. °>w�.n<....N..M1 - r '°:Iel p I tin°�f,-e r q� J' �„°�I ,: �`�,.+'" 1y- i�)`I \ r 1 r '°"°nx ax"am�sr!•.i'e v°.��(i7°,..'on:n.°mic:>m.'«a nmmic:im`r: m.lu"a -- •q a. 3d H; I I � ---tea` ♦ \ ` r •b aq�[er•nel r.aw..w.m.mbsw.w'°�°o:,n..n�".va"a•d wt mvm...a vd.. / • =` / jc ( r .` \ \ 1 I avr .xYm omix° gwpmn..e. I N� r s \ ° °♦\ \ 1/�/l C 1 1 v ia'an°iao.'e1tllm.';:.7"•.�..:x °'b,a;;>o.a...a Y�°la"• i a� �-- r��� r � \ .�=m,_'° ,d tea, I I�,rdrr\I �—)nl •ro ° ,r�• _ >n.mm..i,.,....r::I..��omr°n:,m n nl x.rlx>o°. ";o � d� � '"�\`.�,x+'�_ — i � -'�'Iw'e$fit j '� F'�Ij�o.��� �u�M::"°,mK>z"ux>wm..n�a".r.°w m°u::lw:°°:ca"Ir°.oaa IF` mares r'�'i°�I 11'' I i 4 rlA°.ur/ yy r,E¢-as>., ..(a le D.a+xl a mom°a iun F 'isd�,>L®.n.N�.�--- s �-°C ,- e,r'me° �: .�t/irr arr v v°u � ��i.°m•°•i.tun�:o.'e",x"'W9���mb.`.:nL ,"a�s�:.°:.b.'de,i,Pm (�. -'— -----� 8 CYU tr-----. � .,� _ = P�' a ;„ a m.�e w,..rx°.w,:::ti:°A°ri°:"�a.� -°° c3 u � ,p'• s ( - --� ,� \ • (',�' i r d�•, - , «°�^�« ) ALTA LAND TITLE SURVEY Z vas `. aaP'``\ap i I °°i ' i R_, a ®:.H�mp;Ma.z«^m���".'x"a.°x`°".a':: a a,m.xa, tor. �(r ,> +'4h ) , _) .,•'^- °o'.O1x°a pwechmit»m vm I�...w ,v• °.., r°a x a..ma..i x.r..nr n.ma..°u:- �� d°' � s)/ 9c 4`Te ,,,+ ; Y .k Y- w/ ^9`,a" v-.a x":v e:°;c P'^�v w°w m wmer• REAL ESTATE RECYCLING ` I �y. 1 /. „• ®�.n:,mdnA.nM1.uT U�,.°"t�m.Nam 0 ;' ^" a°,r> '43•`JI'l'r3> N3'�``�D__•---.+�-�' ° w°noxis rxx te•' ed'° ..w fw •aw,v.,'^"r:.�,,.p,r x.��ru":'°:��°°.�n".v,.,v SITE•4001 LAKE BREQE AVENUE NORTH V �s(p JI v °L \, ^�% // "'> �$ c a! m.rte r�.m- u as�e«leg,°H N BROOKLYN CENTER,MINNESOTA Z __ -,a'°- Sv sF ma \ ,r a o m�4.w a.nl::"d�t,":" ° ,a� tP'Y-- __ 9c v3' -- -'�° as7-,y /___° 10 a mr as w."a.d filer 4 lvm..°.a•..,,x.`>ama H a.:ina..r w wnY OF 1 >s P a_ __ \ e..w xt r°Nx a 4mwr. o< � �i� _ ��_�-_ _ _ ppi ' .____ �'�mmd�mm��z�`z�ti.°n°�i�.^Mama ww�i z3,�a i'o h- _.^' _�-_ _I,�'�!ct]`� � . '' .rc, LEGEND x 2'PZT�° e+9.\\ �... ���_�t3x>z.� _ --\\� �i' PmP,rIY N°numant r,W�tnt�a x my�W n m,s,r u,oe i ce ' —___O3�°-_.__3oF � - >�xe-ti.`,. C. o,.m.oa a.aule i).s n'i'm'wzsuxa . .n e.ar>n �� ——_ -- - - •t�x, �$'.°+LVs a _— pna.rBra"na ooaW° y - r — —v—•— 1-It-Sanzr �r wm bn�mt.un44e aNmw sn.° a a�a Peas.mt°w H,n. Tfn -- una drat n . •,*. ..b,Dm.y°°i°°m°c-4.iw:>' Z d„v w �V 3'(,j_••• __._ .r-- .p w ,v"yan ve"i.�a za Foes.,.'pmv�a ii�wn:iov>..'°�t a m>w oe x u. ner,r.m, Y j ° E •---�— �n°. z urewi.wn'.LNV�i.'�t,;:,iv�w.ai>p�'ni°m�i,w`s°e"p �x>'>a;i�u. OC8 ' s— 0 Odi�y S.M. on°,d on i... o cotchb p° "vveNL ad,e>v«Y>I_a`e.�°ia m°o.,.m�0d`a°J'�L xwo..°.o„n.°t'r°r.iw:wx N © vlcnb ..'(a v m:aPm.y NI°nn-vr vnvn--n.°°„°,m.n-avva.,u...nmmi.°, y�i STATE cs.n ry M.nM1ab p.�n�t y,m„ t.e.mn.m Haa.�W d ¢w P.c."'� HIGHWAY iena•m .r.rn o Manhda �,,, P., Mrevme.ml,m CERTIFICATION: �pz� .a..ro° - + m rd none Mannar. ov«zmn•C° w•xP•.nwt N.N.N,.,.,e,aa`..a..lr,.r unn>.m _�man m Lm n.d rmn.c.",„A.,..m rx.t An.lam nu. > 7 \, °4 v firaphwe eon �,-�• n::,.�1z�a.lda alp 4]a°4 mmax x.i.n”->.xovv m°.wn.n,x. 1M.x.c.n m.t Inr.i Nn,°.mva n. °'4d,: i llaghl Pols Az ww x.a W®n[fK AV°c w�°i"i,`ava i1 xrm °mom°""°' „m .m.Y_ Nx N,.e..d...m.,. o>8 Q :mow ar a°r°A'ed,fir-w'wnae `•.j VICINITY MAP °'t° 1\-,rs x ni nl• „°"•',:r",M'e".',::.v m'.m1nO•e^v;>w","em',°°„'."I'.u,'i a Je;lv i�°°'b"„° i."x i°i eL'it ieq�"a o.',N.1-d n m rmw A n�...e m.r.�a '4" wY.6N.- , .� 0 co.V.Iro pG q:a�i'iw°oew..,i.:l xa ri6>a>N U.emo er u..CwnIYP .fw le ••• N%W.•.eV%x°I,. �N?� .4 o eunb voet x>.'`.e'oml w yNwr p D7 �.cIH BaN 53��,,,,,,,1,- m,y,"„u��a t.v.v.r mu mr bw-w n�4mF, Nr • %' ``w°a""n,10;vw�µ«n,w C� io��a am iii'''.<i u:aL.i. inµ°�"�°d"."a m. TQcZ or • vx p -___-0OI----. COntln°B°Canlwr m°Om•nrnl Nr T�'Pa.,,>i4t f>a 1s'Pmar,}AS Sil°°IM 14 iq x 001.2>C EslsllnB SDat m.wtiw Wtlar %0]4.] Exiatrn9 SP°l EJ<vatlon ••,` � � p.ddaw.rm.(omm.t.r m mane.) v..,�,r �� xor,o s \ Canlf°roue T..(oi°melvr N InaM1ax) I`a�q'`.�Y° °••� 1..11 1-3.6234A tz .. ....................- _. ,..... _.._ ------ OPUS. LAKE BREEZE AVE.N •• Opus AE G+GUp,Inc. `�, .B • x-7--4 ,� �(� —�.�(�J— —� ...,..,,. ,. cams mm m P1NNN . m mxxxpm xamx'",""" z mxm[m a = o¢ 6 � "�I�I� 5 II'"� owvemucoPS '� m M7=1 cNs- PROPOSED OFFICE/ �uu IJ WAREHOUSE 00.000 sp,2 GROSS AREA f�1 � mucNwuRr ` } meemm ri muxiro eutm npwx � �ap0`'``u"c2 ( RONnOONN POND \ s'yysss�P'C� zi miz mr a¢nnttx . i 1 yyyy �,�+r-o•moc omuxous m+; _ %� %77-- �ya •�!y%� � r Z41 ' /R''r'�,J Lr�onin SBZ41100 mxc o%z+-zwz N LnuNAs ARE PLAN P.. [ w-o G.MINING F NMgNfi/J.NN;MISON SITE DATA — NOTE �°e;�',,'+ •,�';M[b" e°w.wa ZONING-. a-;PnaK m[[o f Rmnm v[aw"G[muaYNR _ ' MNMRUCNGN TPC•••— -- [ouuxm x:mum swm ax[�z¢m. m . .r.l�M =MTIx[m 0[mu"�"u[ vno"mx� m<u.. �m�i•�w� OCNPMICY CIASG: 1RaviN onwm aMO R Oxax[Ro0P6,m Px"I.c rVtaT .rxb E.umnt nq nrt S(IE OAfA tea X BUILDING enEn +mac xx[xc xx smu�u s G *µ_ '"�•"°"'"'� xu£miWHOl.moR RnV uI Th2x�[ PMNMG REOUMMENTS: �""zsmUm y`•500 mm[mu¢xo art w[z,scxm¢m r[x[¢ py GvnzPm m t sumo V.a vm y �v0"N�Bml IpTllai=6 BM.Iq¢YIP � .�'-"� t�Estme Rcc,cling PARgNG P—as uu(rdxta-ok CPE IXCWWGE 2fiG80.LLC eW a®m[alU1 FRANCE AVENUE BUILDING SETBACK REOUIRDI M@ BUSINESS °Yp"G"TMP0IId0 °a CENTER 4 meuux sa ruQ _� Bn�v so=. • mwax s¢mam race >s ITE PLAN CONCEPT/DEVELOPMENTSITE PLAN �m^�TM� u S P4ANING SEIBYIf REOUMENENIS: amrnxugm wee s"m:rin,rvxrmu�m na,au[s =r Nxmam XUUC Sa6f,rAS,Imu aDOMiM Mt1 m ��' A1.1 OM OPUS. Opus AE Group,Inc. .aC ReOo G) 0 G GNU v21tl TRUCK COURT SECTION w1n]N9v R: FRANCE AVENUE BUSINESS CENTER 4 SITE SECTION A3.2 ------------------ i DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION APRIL 12, 2012 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Rahn at 7:01 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Sean Rahn, Commissioners Scott Burfeind, Kara Kuykendall, and Michael Parks were present. Also present Councilmember Carol Kleven, were Secretary to the Planning Commission Tim Benetti, Director of Business & Development, Gary Eitel, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Stan Leino, Carlos Morgan and Stephen Schonning were absent and excused. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—MARCH 29 2012 There was a motion by Commissioner Parks , seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to approve the minutes of the March 29, 2012 meeting as submitted. The motion passed unanimously. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Rahn explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. APPLICATION NO.2012-002 PAUL HYDE (REAL ESTATE RECYCLING) Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-002, a request for PUD/Rezoning from C-2 (Commerce) to PUD-MIXED C-2/1-1 (Commerce/Industrial Park), along with a proposed concept development plan for a new 90,000 sq. ft. office/manufacturing/warehouse facility located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North. Mr. Benetti presented the staff report describing the location of the property and the proposal. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 4- 12-12 for Application No. 2012-002.) Mr. Benetti explained that prior to the request for rezoning, the City's 2010 Comprehensive Plan was amended to allow a Mixed Use/OS/I (Office-Service, Business/Industrial) land use category that adds an industrial element to the underlying land use allowing the manufacturing and warehouse components for this new development. He added that the subject site currently consists of 8.67 acres of vacant land, formerly a Lifetime Fitness facility and a Denny's Restaurant. Mr. Benetti stated that during preliminary testing and soil investigations of the subject site, RER discovered some potential volatile organic compounds and petroleum compounds which may require soil clean up and remediation work. He added that a $50,000 grant was received from 4-12-12 Page 1 i ij i DEED in December 2011 to assist with the investigation and clean up and Mr. Hyde is soliciting other rants for additional required clean u . Mr. Benetti stated that a re platting of the property g q p p g p p Y will be considered by the Commission at a future meeting and this application is for PUD and conceptual site plan approval only. Mr. Benetti reminded the Commission that a land use amendment to the City's Comprehensive l Plan was previously approved by the Metropolitan Council to allow the rezoning for this redevelopment to take place. PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-002 There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2012-002, 7:12 at p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. Mr. Paul Hyde, Real Estate Recycling, introduced himself to the Commission. Commissioner Parks asked Mr. Hyde if this rezoning will give them the best opportunity for a successful redevelopment of this site. He further stated that he'd like the applicant to `emphasis' the building since this location is a gateway to the city. Mr. Hyde stated that they have examined several site plan layouts for this site and have attempted to display the most attractive part of the building along Hwy 100 with no traffic on Azelia Avenue. Chair Rahn asked about the status of clean up on the site. Mr. Hyde responded that he has completed three superfund site projects, more than anybody in the country. He added they have applied for additional funds to help remediate the site since the discovery of extensive PAH compounds, probably left behind from highway projects, were found on the site. He added they plan to start clean-up work by July 1, 2012 and anticipate starting construction a few weeks later to deliver the building on a clean site the first part of December. Mr. Paul Keicker, 4701 Azelia Avenue, asked about any studies done on the extension of the bike trail since it will be located directly next to his property. He stated that he bought his home since it is a quiet location and the addition of the trails will add foot traffic close to his property. He also asked about the retaining wall, status of existing trees and the impact of the pond that will be 200 ft. from his property. Chair Rahn responded that this is a conceptual plan and some of those issues will be addressed during final site plan review and approval. Mr. Benetti explained that the goal is to take the Twin Lake Regional Trail where it dead ends at the park and bring it to Lakeside Avenue connecting at the SW corner of the site along the back end to the east side of Azelia Avenue. He added that they have not finalized how this will all work together but the city is working with Three Rivers Park District and Metropolitan Council on the design of the trail connection. He further added that this is slated for 2015 construction and is part of a regional trail funded with federal dollars. 4-12-12 Page 2 , Chair Rahn added that the trail will be an amenity to the area once the trail and landscaping is complete. Mr. Hyde responded to Mr. Keicker's questions by stating that they are putting up a cedar fence along the residential area along with a significant change in grade to provide adequate screening from the residential area. He added that the pond will have rain water that runs off the roof to allow sediment to be treated before it runs into the watershed. No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on Application No. 2012-002. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Parks , seconded by Commissioner Burfeind, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2012-002, at 7:24 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-04 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-002 SUBMITTED BY PAUL HYDE OF REAL ESTATE RECYCLING LLC FOR THE REZONING OF LAND LOCATED AT 4001 LAKEBREEZE AVENUENUE NORTH FROM C2 (COMMERCE) TO PUD-MIXED C2/I-1 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-MIXED COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK) There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall,to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-04. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind,Kuykendall, and Parks And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Planning Commission will consider the development plan/site and building plan for this proposed PUD at their April 26, 2012 meeting. The Council will initially consider the rezoning element of this application at its April 23, 2012 meeting, whereby Council will receive this favorable recommendation and asked to set a public hearing at the May 14, 2012 Council meeting. At this meeting, the Council will give final consideration this proposed Planned Unit Development, which shall include the rezoning and the final development/site plan of the subject site. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. 4-12-12 Page 3 i Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO, 2012-002 SUBMITTED BY PAUL HYDE OF REAL ESTATE RECYCLING, LLC, FOR THE REZONING OF LAND LOCATED AT 4001 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE NORTH FROM C2 (COMMERCE) TO PUD-MIXED C2/I-1 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT- MIXED COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK) WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012-002 submitted by Paul Hyde, on behalf of Real Estate Recycling, LLC proposes rezoning the 7.39 acre site located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North, along with the 1.27 acre MnDOT excess right-of-way parcel located adjacent to and immediately east of the 7.39 acre site (herein referred to as the "Subject Site"), from C2 (Commerce) to PUD-Mixed C2/1-1 (Planned Unit Development — Mixed Commerce and Industrial Park) of; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends the rezoning of the above mentioned Subject Site to facilitate the planned and future redevelopment of the site with a proposed 90,000 sq. ft. office/industrial/warehouse facility on said properties; and WHEREAS, on February 13, 2012, the City Council adopted City Resolution No. 2012-031 which approved an amendment to the 2030 Comprehensive Plan by changing the land use designation on the Subject Site from OS-Office/Service Business to a new Mixed-Use OS/I — Office-Service Business/Industrial; and whereby the City subsequently received official notice from the Metropolitan Council by means of letter of approval, dated March 13, 2012 in which said land use amendment was accepted by the Met Council; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on April 12, 2012, whereby a planning staff report was presented and public testimony regarding the rezoning and development plan(concept only) were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the rezoning request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezoning contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the C2 (Commerce) and 1-1 (Industrial Park) Zoning District standards contained in Sections 35-322 and 35-330 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, and the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Comrission of the City of Brooklyn Center recommends to the City Council that the rezoning element comprehended under Application No. 2012-02, as submitted by Paul Hyde of Real Estate Recycling, LLC be approved based upon the following considerations: i II RESOLUTION NO. 1. The planned rezoning is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance; 2. The rezoning, which will facilitate the redevelopment and improvement of the Subject Site, will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land; 3. The rezoning and utilization of the Subject Site as proposed under the planned redevelopment of said site is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with ordinance standards, in particular the incorporation of the 100 ft. and 50 ft. buffer requirements where industrial uses abut residential zoned property at a property line and a street line respectively; 4. The rezoning and land use amendment proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city; 5. The rezoning proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this proposed development can be considered an asset to the community; and 6. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating rezoning's as contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. AND WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center recommends to the City Council that Application No. 2012-002 be approved subject to the following conditions memorialized herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council for the City of Brooklyn Center, that Planning Commission Application No. 2012-002 submitted by Paul Hyde, on behalf of Real Estate Recycling, LLC, which proposes the rezoning the 7.39 acre site located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North, along with the 1.27 acre MnDOT excess right-of-way parcel located adjacent to and immediately east of the 7.39 acre site (the Subject Site), from C2 (Commerce) to PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 (Planned Unit Development — Mixed Commerce and Industrial Park), is hereby approved based on the following conditions: I RESOLUTION NO. 1) The rezoning is subject to the successful acceptance and approval by the City Council of the final development/site plan proposed for the subject site. 2) No part of the land may be used or developed under the site plan labeled "conceptual" until such time as the Applicant submits a separate site and building plan application. 3) The submittal and approval of the platting and combining of the former Northwest Athletic Club (Lifetime Fitness) parcel and the former Denny's Restaurant (now excess MnDOT right-of-way parcel), to a yet unnamed or identified subdivision plat. April 23, 2012 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Cleric The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Paul Hyde -Real Estate Recycling France Avenue Business Center 4 Planned Unit Development Planning Application No. 2012-002 City Council MeetingCity Council Meeting April 23, 2012April 23, 2012 Agenda Item No. 9.aAgenda Item No. 9.a Introduction First Reading of proposed rezoning request by Paul Hyde,  from C2 (Commerce) to PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 (Planned Unit Development of Commerce/Industrial Park) Subject site located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North  and includes the adjacent MnDOT excess ROW parcel to the east PUD Rezoning will facilitate the redevelopment of this site  with new 90,000 sf. office/warehouse facility Location Map former NW former NW Athletic Athletic Club Club (Lifetime (Lifetime Fitness) Fitness) SiteSite 2006 Aerial 2009 Aerial 1956 Aerial 1.27 acres1.27 acres 7.4 7.4 acresacres Total (combined) area of these two parcels is 8.7 acres Background Lifetime Fitness Corp. demolished and cleared the property in 2006 RER has a purchase agreement with Lifetime to acquire and develop this site Preliminary testing of the subject site reveals potential semi-volatile organic compounds, petroleum compounds and asbestos paint materials, which will require soil clean up and remediation Mr. Hyde received a grant through Department of Employment and Economic Development to assist in the testing and preparation of a clean-up plan; and is now seeking additional grants to assist with the physical clean-up and mitigation The site and building plan and replat of the two parcels will be considered under separate planning applications at a future Planning Commission meeting CURRENT ZONINGCURRENT ZONING I-2 zone contains existing office/warehouse developments;  R-4 consists of a number of 4-plex apartment buildings interspersed with single-family homes.  R-2 consists of a number of single-family homes; two-family (duplexes);  R-5 zone contains the Twin Lake Apartment complex.  LAND USELAND USE Mixed Mixed Use Use ––OS/I OS/I Land use change Land use change from from OSOS--Office Service Office Service and and Roadways Roadways to to new new (Office(Office--Service Service Business/Industrial) Business/Industrial) approved by City Council Feb. 13, 2012approved by City Council Feb. 13, 2012 Met Council approved land use amendment on March 13, 2012Met Council approved land use amendment on March 13, 2012 Trail Issues… 2030 Comprehensive Plan 2030 Comprehensive Plan Met Council approval offered the following: Met Council approval offered the following: Met Council master plan for the regional trail identifies a potential future trail Met Council master plan for the regional trail identifies a potential future trail ““ connection extending along Lakeside Ave. from Twin Lakes Ave. and then connection extending along Lakeside Ave. from Twin Lakes Ave. and then curving north through Azelia through the CPA site. Met Council encourages curving north through Azelia through the CPA site. Met Council encourages the City to facilitate conversation with Three Rivers Dist. and site developer to the City to facilitate conversation with Three Rivers Dist. and site developer to examine feasibility of developing trail connection.examine feasibility of developing trail connection. ” ” PUD Development/Site PlanPUD Development/Site Plan -CONCEPTUAL - NOT FOR OFFICIAL CONSIDERATION Zoning Issues The new PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 zoning would allow the  development of this site as an Office/Manufacturing/Warehouse use Staff recommended Mr. Hyde apply under this PUD-  Mixed zoning to ensure the site is developed according to the proposed development plan; eliminate the need for outdoor storage; and proper buffers are required and maintained Rezoning Evaluation & Findings(per Sect. 35-208) Guidelines a.Is there a clear and public need or benefit? b.Is the proposed zoning consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classifications? c.Can all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district be contemplated for development of the subject property? d.Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the subject property was zoned? e.In the case of City-initiated rezoning proposals, is there a broad public purpose evident? f.Will the subject property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed zoning districts? g.Is the subject property generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present zoning district, with respect to size, configuration, topography or location? h.Will the rezoning result in the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by: 1) Comprehensive Planning; 2) the lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or 3) the best interests of the community? i.Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an individual parcel? Recommendation This matter was presented under public hearing before the City Planning Commission at the April 12, 2012 regular meeting Planning Commission recommended partial approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2012-002, which comprehends the rezoning of the subject site noted herein from C2 (Commerce) district to PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 (Commerce/Industrial Park), subject to the following conditions: 1.The rezoning is subject to the successful acceptance and approval by the City Council of the final development/site plan proposed for the subject site. 2.No part of the land may be used or developed under the site plan labeled “conceptual” until such time as the Applicant submits a separate site and building plan application. 3.The submittal and approval of the platting and combining of the former Northwest Athletic Club (Lifetime Fitness) parcel and the former Denny’s Restaurant (now excess MnDOT right-of-way parcel), to a yet unnamed or identified subdivision plat. Follow-up Development/SiteandBuildingPlanelementofthisPUD applicationisscheduledtobeconsideredbeforethePlanning CommissiononApril26,2012 IfCityCouncilauthorizesthisrezoningtoproceedtothenext publichearingforMay14,2012,finalconsiderationbytheCity CouncilwillbegiventothePUDRezoning,includingthefinal development/siteplanunderthisPUD PUDzoningbecomesvalidaftertherequired30-dayappeal periodhaselapsedafterpublicationofnewordinance amendment Requested Action Adopt attached City Council Resolution, which affirms the Planning Commission recommendation to approve Planning Commission Application No. 2012-002 and conditions; Consider under First Reading the proposed Ordinance Amendment, which would authorize the beginning step of rezoning the subject site, from C2 (Commerce) to PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 (Planned Unit Development of Commerce/Industrial Park); and Approve setting the Public Hearing on this proposed Ordinance Amendment to the May 14, 2012 regular meeting of the City Council, whereby the Second Reading of this Ordinance and final consideration of this PUD will be given. QUESTIONS?QUESTIONS? City Council Agenda Item No. 9b i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 18, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager i FROM: Tim Benetti,Planning and Zoning Specialist d THROUGH: Gary Eitel,Director of Business and Development SUBJECT: Variance and Site &Building Plan Approval Planning Commission Application No. 2012-005 (Border Foods for Taco Bell) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council, following consideration of this matter, approve the Resolution Regarding the Recommended Disposition and Approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2012-005 submitted by Border Foods for a Variance and Site &Building Plan Approval. Background: On April 12,2012 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 2012-005 submitted by Border Foods for a Variance to City Code Section 35-703 and Site &Building Plan approval of a new Taco Bell Restaurant located at 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard Lane. Attached for your review are copies of the Planning Commission Information Sheet for Planning Commission Application No. 2012-005, an area map showing the location of the property under consideration,the Planning Commission minutes relating to the Commission's consideration of this matter and other supporting documents included in this review. Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Council Goals: Strategic: 2. We will proceed aggressively with implementation of City's redevelopment plans. Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive conununio?that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the pub is trust I, Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-005 SUBMITTED BY BORDER FOODS, INC. FOR THE APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO CITY CODE SECTION 35-703 AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL OF A NEW TACO BELL RESTAURANT, LOCATED AT 5532 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD LANE. WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012-005 submitted by Border Foods, Inc. proposes a variance to Section 35-703 of the City Code, specifically to allow a 12-ft. reduction from the 50-ft. minimum spacing requirement between two separate access driveways on a single commercial zoned parcel, along with the site and building plans of a new 2,642 sq. ft. Taco Bell restaurant, located at 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard Lane; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on April 12, 2012, whereby a planning staff report was presented and public testimony regarding the variance and site and building plan were received; and WHEREAS, in light of all testimony received, and utilizing the guidelines and standards for evaluating and determining variances under Section 35-240 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission considered and determined the appropriateness of said variance based on the following factors: a) the property owner's request to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance is justifiable and reasonable, considering the overall improvements to this site as a convenience food restaurant are not drastically changing. The ability to add three access drives into this site will provide better separation and allow customer traffic to safely enter and exit this site. b) the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, since the original site was laid out and approved in 1985 under a different restaurant and created a conflicting layout for vehicle movements inside the site and those entering or exiting. Brooklyn Boulevard Lane is also a private road and serves more as a private/public driveway throughout its history. c) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality, due to the fact that other commercial users in this Brooklyn Boulevard commercial area have similar driveways closer than 50- I I 1 Commissioner Ku kendall introduced the following resolution and Y g moved its adoption PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-07 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-005 SUBMITTED BY BORDER FOODS, INC. FOR THE APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO CITY CODE SECTION 35-703 AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL OF A NEW TACO BELL RESTAURANT, LOCATED AT 5532 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD LANE. WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012-005 submitted by Border Foods, Inc. proposes a variance to Section. 35-703 of the City Code, specifically to allow the spacing of three driveways on a single commercial zoned parcel to .be closer than the 50-foot minimum spacing requirements, along with the site and building plans of a new 2,642 sq. ft. Taco Bell restaurant,located at 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard lane; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on April 12, 2012, whereby a planning staff report was presented and public testimony regarding the variance and site and building plan were received; and WHEREAS, in light of all testimony received, and utilizing the guidelines and standards for evaluating and determining variances under Section 35-240 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission considered and determined the appropriateness of said variance based on the following factors: a) the property owner's request to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance is justifiable and reasonable, considering the overall improvements to this site as a convenience food restaurant are not drastically changing. The ability to add three access drives into this site will provide better separation and allow customer traffic to safely enter and exit this site. b) the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, since the original site was laid out and approved in 1985 under a different restaurant and created a conflicting layout for vehicle movements inside the site and those entering or exiting. Brooklyn Boulevard Lane is also a private road and serves more as a private/public driveway throughout its history. c) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality, due to the fact that other commercial users in this Brooklyn Boulevard commercial area have similar driveways closer than 50- i PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-04 feet, and this Brooklyn Boulevard Lane is a private road system. d) Economic considerations alone did not constitute practical difficulties in this particular case; and WHEREAS, in light of all testimony received, and utilizing the guidelines for evaluating the site and building plans as contained in Section 35-230 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan,the Planning Commission considered the site and building plans for the new 2,542 sq. ft. Taco Bell restaurant, and determined it to be and appropriate and reasonable redevelopment of this site; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2012-005 submitted by Border Foods,Inc. is hereby approved, subject the following conditions: 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure the completion of site improvements. 4. Any future roof-top or ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 5. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 6. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signs, which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 8: B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 2 of 3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-04 9. The applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 10. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center's current standard specifications and details. April 12, 2012 r Date Chair ATTES :. i Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Burfeind and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall and Parks and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 3 of 3 i DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION APRIL 12,2012 Excerpts APPLICATION NO. 2012-005 -BORDER FOODS (TACO BELL) Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-005, a request for a variance to allow three (3) driveways to be closer than the 50-foot minimum separation requirement for business district properties, along with a site and building plan of a new 2,642 sq. ft. Taco Bell restaurant, located at 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard. He added that the applicant is seeking variance approval due to site constraints and the desire to serve their customers safely and more effectively at their drive- thru service. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 4-12-12 for Application No. 2012-005) Mr. Benetti stated that after studying this area it appears setbacks were limited or allowed to reduce to a minimum of 10-feet along this private roadway and the roadway was never considered or recognized as either the front or rear yard for setback purposes. He added that required setbacks for the C2 district are 35-ft. front; 40-ft. rear; and 10-ft. side yard. The new Taco Bell building is shown with a 47.4 foot setback from Brooklyn Boulevard, a 29.6-ft. setback off Brooklyn Boulevard Lane; and a 15-ft. setback from the south side lot line. The setbacks for the existing building are 81-feet; 15 feet; and 52.2 feet,respectively. I He further explained that this area is somewhat unique to the City and this commercial area with respect to the private roadway that serves these commercial businesses. The new restaurant will be served by a larger drive-thru aisle, with a maximum stacking of up to 11 vehicles. The existing drive-thru lane is impacted by the central layout of the building and the location of customer parking spaces. This new drive-thru layout directs drive thru customers to the outer parts of the site, with separated driveways and access points out onto Brooklyn Boulevard Lane. He added that by approving the variance, it allows better stacking of vehicles and creates a better, safer layout on the site. Commissioner Parks asked about the private roadway. Mr. Benetti responded that it is a private roadway, one of only two in the city that serves as a public roadway giving access to the businesses in the area. He added City records indicate that historically the driveways in this area spilling out to the private roadway did not need to meet the 50 ft. setback which is normally required. PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-005 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2012-005, at 10:15 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. 4-12-12 Page 15 it DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION APRIL 12,2012 Excerpts I Barbara Schneider, Border Foods, stated that she reviewed the notes from the City Engineer and she would like to have further dialogue with the City Engineer to resolve his concerns. She further pointed out the location of the rear service door and traffic flow as addressed in the Engineer's comments. Dean Mattson, Architect, described the materials to be used on the new building. Councilmember Kleven asked if the building would have an automatic door opener. Ms. Schneider responded that she would look into it since there are no plans for one. No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on Application No. 2012-005. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Burfeind, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2012-005, at 10:26 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or q uestions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-07 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-005 SUBMITTED BY BORDER FOODS INC. FOR THE APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO CITY CODE SECTION 35-703 AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL OF A NEW TACO BELL RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 5532 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD LANE. There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Burfeind, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-07. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, and Parks. And the following'voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its April 23, 2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. 4-12-12 Page 16 G'iq'OC> ]ffjpphJ}tV CF�NTF,'R Planning Commission Information Sheet 1 Meeting Date: April 12,2012 i Application Filed on 3-23-12 City Council action should be taken by 5-22-12 (60 Days) Application No. 2012-005 Applicant: Border Foods, Inc. Location: 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard Lane Request: Site &Builidng Plan and Variance to City Code Sect. 35-703 INTRODUCTION Border Foods,Inc., on behalf of BFI Real Este Holdings, LLC, is seeking site and building plan approval and a variance to Section 36-703 of the city's Zoning Ordinance to reconstruct a new 2,642 sq. ft. Taco Bell restaurant on the existing property, 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard Lane. The property in question is zoned C-2 (Commerce). Under Sect. 35-322; Subp. 3.c., convenience food restaurants such as this are permitted as a special use (provided they do not abut an Rl,R2, or R3 district). The subject site was originally approved as a Zantigo Mexican Restaurant in 1985 by means of a site plan and special use permit. City records reveal the old restaurant changed ownership and was remodeled into a Taco Bell in 1992. The Applicants are seeking this change due to the site constraints and needs to serve their customers safely and more effectively in their drive-thru service lane. This site plan and variance are being considered under the public hearing process; written notices have been sent to all adjacent property owners within 350-feet of the site. ❖ BUILDING The property is bounded by Bremer Bank to the north; The 50's Grill restaurant to the south; Brooklyn Boulevard to the west; and Brooklyn Boulevard lane to the east. Brooklyn Blvd. Ln. is a private, service road in which all businesses along this block share in the ownership and maintenance of said roadway. It appears from personally studying this area and reviewing aerial mapping of this commercial block that setbacks were limited or allowed to reduce to a minimum. of 10-feet along this private roadway. In effect, the roadway was never considered or recognized as either the front or rear yard for setback purposes; instead is appears to have been regulated as a typical side-yard with a minimum 10-foot setback granted to other uses along this block. The required setbacks for the C2 district are 35-ft. front; 40-ft. rear; and 10-ft. side yard. The new Taco Bell building is shown with a 47.4 foot setback from Brooklyn Boulevard, a 29.6-ft. setback off Brooklyn Blvd. Lane; and a 15-ft. setback from the south side lot line. The setbacks for the existing building are 81-feet; 15 feet; and 52.2 feet, respectively. Planning Staff had indicated to the Planning Commissioners at the March 29, 2012 Study Session meeting that this area is somewhat unique to the City and this commercial area, particularly with respect to the private roadway that serves these commercial businesses. As PC 04/12/12 Page 1 of 7 noted, Staff is considering this commercial area as a potential case study for creating a new Master Plan or PUD over this area to govern this and other future uses as this site continues or may redevelop, similar this Taco Bell reconstruct. The building exteriors are to be improved with similar 4-sided architecture and designs, with the main wall potions consisting primarily of EIFS materials in earth-tone colors. The roof line edges are banded with unique,multi-colored EIFS materials, and the two longer wall spaces are improved with architectural,multi-colored panels and"eye-brow"trellis features. The lower portion of the new building is improved with a cultured stone wainscoting material along the bottom edges and part of the doorway framings and drive-thru window areas. The new restaurant will be served by a larger drive-thru aisle,with a maximum stacking of up to 11 vehicles. The existing drive-thru lane is impacted by the central layout of the building, and the location of customer parking spaces. This new drive-thru layout directs or filters the drive thru customers to the outer parts of the site, with separated driveways and access points out on to Brooklyn Blvd. Lane. The floor plans provided are very detailed, and illustrate the common seating area and service area as well as the layout for kitchen/food prep area,restrooms, and cooler space. The building will also contain the trash enclosure inside the building. The indoor eating area provides for 48 seats. The Applicant indicated up to 10 employees would be working on the largest shift. + ACCESS/PARKING Access to this existing site is gained through two large accesses from the private roadway only. Under the new site plan,two 24-ft. wide,two-way accesses will be provided. The third access point is a one-way directional exit point for the new drive-thru lane. No direct access to Brooklyn Boulevard is proposed,nor would it be allowed. Under Section 35-703 of the City Zoning Code, no two driveways on any single parcel of land in a business or industrial district shall be less than 50 feet apart at the property line. Due to the increase of driveways under this plan and because they would not meet this 50-foot separation requirement, Staff encouraged the owners to submit a variance to allow for the placement and spacing of these driveways. This variance analysis will be presented later in this.report. The building will be oriented to the south edge of the site,with a drive thru lane going in a counter clockwise fashion around the northerly and westerly edges of the parking areas, and leading up to the southerly wall/pick-up window of the new restaurant. The main parking area contains 31 parking stalls, including two handicap accessible stalls, and is centrally located on the development site. Parking for this site is based on the restaurant parking formula which requires one space for every two seats and one space for every two employees at the maximum shift. There are 48 seats serving this combined restaurant and 10-employees. This requires 29 parking spaces. The Engineering Department has expressed some concern about the circulation around the site. They are requesting the Applicant provide vehicle turning movements for design in the drive- thru, and provide vehicle turning movements for delivery design vehicle from/to Brooklyn PC 04/12/12 I Page 2 of 7 Boulevard Lane, through the points of ingress/egress and throughout the site. Further review of these matters by the applicant is in order. ❖ GRADING/DRAINAGE/IITILITIES B-612 curb and gutter is shown to be provided around all driving and parking areas. Drainage in the parking lot is handled by one, centrally located catch basin, with two other inlets located at the upper northwest corner of the lot and the other located directly west inside the drive thru lane. The sanitary sewer and water service lines will be reconnected inside the parking areas. There does not appear to be any need to run new laterals all the way out to the utility mains inside Brooklyn Boulevard. The grading, drainage and utility plans have being reviewed by the City Engineer and written comments are provided as a separate attachment to this report. Some of these conditions will be noted as part of any conditions of approval or must be completed as part of final building permit review and permitting in the future. ❖ LANDSCAPING The applicant has submitted a landscape plan in response to the landscape point system used to evaluate such plans. This 0.61 acre site requires 80 landscape points. The applicant's proposal is to retain as many as three existing shade trees on the site,which consists of one nice 21" ash near the upper northwest corner, and calls for the protection of two similar ash trees and two evergreen trees inside or on the shared Bremer Bank property line to the north. The Applicant proposes to meet the landscape requirements by providing five new deciduous trees: one Amur maple; two Armstrong maples; and 2 Greenspire lindens. Credit of 10 points for the 21"ash is given,with 50 additional points for the new maples and lindens. The remaining 20 points is made up in 40 new smaller planting s, consisting of barberry, honeysuckle and spirea shrubs. Other areas will be completed with either sod or a variety of perennials listed in the landscape plans (Sheet L-1). The plan also calls for the placement of"random sized limestone boulders" throughout the landscaped areas. These boulder features should provide a nice complement to the restaurant site. All landscaped areas will be irrigated. I For all intents and purposes,the this landscape plan does a great job in identifying and providing for a number of shade trees and low-level plantings in such a tight, compacted development site. The Applicant and their design team should be commended for developing such a plan. ❖ LIGHTING/TRASH The applicant has submitted a lighting plan showing photometrics and the location of six 25-ft. high freestanding light poles. The building's outer walls, doorways and the painted"expression panels" also contain a number of downcast accent lights. The foot candles shown do not exceed the standards outlined within the City's Zoning Ordinance. The light standards should be shielded in such a way so as to concentrate illumination on the property. No glare should emanate from, or be visible beyond,the boundaries of the property. The plan shows the location of the trash enclosure to be to be located inside the building. Although not typical of other commercial uses, especially convenience food restaurants such as this one, Staff again commends the Taco Bell owners in eliminating the need or visible impact an outside trash enclosure brings to a site. PC 04/12/12 Page 3 of 7 i i i VARIANCE ANALYSIS The Applicant is requesting a variance to City Code Section 35-703 related to the required spacing (50-feet)between driveways in commercial districts. As illustrated on these site plans and noted earlier in this report,the three access points needed for Taco Bell's reconstructed site would not meet this spacing standard. Section 35-240—Variances of the City Code provides the current governing rules and standards in the review of variances. The section states the Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, recommends and the City Council grants variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique and distinctive to the individual property under consideration. A variance may be granted by the City Council after demonstration by evidence that all of the Standards for Variances, contained in the Zoning Ordinances are met, which include the following: a) Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific parcels of land involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out. b) The conditions upon which the application for a variance is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought, and are not common, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. c) The alleged hardship is related to the requirements of this ordinance and has not been created by any persons presently or formerly having an interest in the parcel of land. d) The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is located. The Applicants have provided for the Commissioners review their response to these standards (attached). As some Planning Commissioners are aware,the Minnesota State Legislature recently passed a bill that significantly revamped the parameters or standards in which municipal governments can review and grant variances. According to Minnesota Statutes 2010, Section 462.357, Subdivision 6. Appeals and Adjustments,the standards noted above have now been revised by eliminating the need to justify or prove a hardship in variances. The overarching standard or principle in the granting of variances is now based on a"reasonable"test or justification. The new law(abbreviated below)provides the following standards: Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan, Variances mad be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there PC 04/12/12 Page 4 of 7 i are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance,means: a) that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance, b) the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the propertynnot created by the landowner; and c) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance, The"reasonable"nature of this particular variance case is somewhat subjective. The property probably functions better with the three driveways, as they provide a safe, effective means of funneling traffic in and out of the property by means of separated driveways. They also allow for the incoming drive-thru traffic to enter the site and direct vehicles over to the drive lane, and exit out back onto Brooklyn Blvd. Lane by means of the one-way exit drive. Staff believes the access plan is appropriate for the needs of this site and is considered a reasonable use. the plight of the landowner is Clue to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner j The existing access points and drive aisles that serve this restaurant site are a bit challenging. This double drive aisle configuration on the south side was created by the approvals granted to the Zantigo Restaurant site in 1985. The northerly two-way access does allow for two way traffic to enter/exit the site; however, incoming drive-thru customers are forced to veer quickly to the left, queue up into the drive-thru lane,place and pick-up orders and exit out the south access. This south access is bottlenecked by its current design, in that drive-thru traffic and regular customer traffic leaving this site may run into periodic conflicts as they leave the site at the same time. There are a number of other commercial properties along this stretch of Brooklyn Bld. Lane with similar spacing issues, so this request being made under this site plan review is not necessarily unique in this case. Although the argument may be made that this spacing is caused by the actions or personal design parameters specified by the Owners,the overwhelming fact remains this site appears to function better with these three driveways, even with the shortened spacing standards. An argument could be made that since Brooklyn Boulevard Lane is a private roadway or private commercial driveway for this Taco Bell and other uses, and that normal spacing standards or requirements do not apply. However,this roadway allows for the free-flow of public vehicles and customers wishing to visit or trade at these various commercial PC 04/12/12 Page 5 of 7 i i as an effective means of separating traffic entering or leaving this site. the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Staff does not believe that granting of this variance would alter the character of the locality or those commercial uses along this block. As stated previously, this driveway configuration is not unique and is evident in other uses along this private roadway section. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Staff does not believe the Applicants are requesting this variance this due to economic reasons or considerations alone. The three access and driveway configuration allows for better flow and separation of customer traffic, and the desire of installing three access points versus only two is obviously more expensive of the two scenarios. The site appears to function and layout better with these three, closer than allowed driveways. RECOMMENDATION Staff believes the Applicant's site plan and driveway configuration lends enough support to granting the variance to City Code Section 35-703, and we feel the redevelopment plans for this new Taco Bell restaurant are generally in order and approval is recommended subject to the following conditions: 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure the completion of site improvements. 4. Any future roof-top or ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 5. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 6. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. PC 04/12/12 Page 6 of 7 8. B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 9. The applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 10. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center's current standard specifications and details. I If the Planning Commission accepts this recommendation and the conditions listed herein, the Commission may elect to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-007, which memorializes the findings in granting this variance and provides for the conditions of approval as they relate to the approval of this site plan. i i �I PC 04/12/12 Page 7 of 7 i i It • q ! 1. , I�J im� = jti/. i+ �{! ��`,�•1;, lt���i��'�''—'_' I�I�1 �; ,t����' 1\ r� r r � C,� �" �K!4-��eV - ! ^°'°.,,,111 ; " � �'�;•T+� ' !' - 'I' 'Q ? ,�`sy._. ,\ L, A.11 r— '. ��'Jl :A i I ACO BELL 6532 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD LN '_.�! J � �t 1 '� s• 4. ,' 1 -�,1 1� 0• 1 I:�� I rI 41 ` y All 11 ti t1 14 4�-. ,1,� •i 11(1t�1 �=i���R�1 �' i .�fi� /, �-�!. f7� �4N4 1 ' i �� 1 �'r`�''', � •! - _ ��,.,1, ;.y, 1�.° , �It� � _.� fib' w ±'' 11 S m TACO BELL 5332 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD LN !-� t,j ,III 80-FT `tl '1(�-;:7 `� :. �,±r �1 �' �hti.• /( �/r,.• sib �A-AT / I • ` r� i' ` ' /4 F, _ ,!• Xr— Wendy'szz� ar t �z - Bremer ank !r " AV l +' 04t. / ! co Bell tl ', r{1 1` ' �� , /° _ •15 (,,}Ytt'�r l Yr.rt ,• r �`-r = III r 1 F r -� ';tt ,'��� �` r_ v��'- i.� ',l �•'rLl�/JL�i�'i.l�l'S��.r', ' owl ._:5� r ■: 11 �� Mcc,Donald's . `r a s �1 °1 -�j p •t 50 s Grille '•-t TT N \4.\ rI _ /.\ •� // t �'�• { 1 Pearle Vision �' _ 1 ,, � l '•, a It � _ f , � ` � ,, � 4� ���14 t�i��'�'1 ';z t ,� "fit.` �; ,�, , . •��' ,'�- 1 - `4, �,..��y - '4+10 ; ., •� ,li. 0 �� ;�' ,� 1._,,, ..,, Goodyear/NTB _ 11 r 1 -{• 1 ®ill j ' j � �r / ( i i '` ` �• r� {I 'f •�15 L'•'11 �1''� � � 1 - r � �{ fit' \ 1 } r fi_a14 } 4 1 1 ��I:�1■ ,. 4J•.`1 i}, 1 ''� 1\�.• � i`1���--�_..�.>-�-a o p,�r� if - Tract F-Private Roadway BROOKLYN BOULEVARD LANE (AREA DEVELOPMENT) ' Tract I-Private Roadway _ _ y < � { '!��' _�t` ALA '• 1; That because of the particular physical surroundings,shape or topographical conditions of the specific parcel of land involved,a particular hardship to the owner would result,as distinguished from a mere inconvenience,if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out. Restrictions which determine the placement of curb cuts create a hardship by artificially reducing turning movements and travel paths for Dine-In consumers and force them to integrate with Drive-Thru turning movements and travel paths. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not applicable,generally,to other property within the same zoning classification. The conditions relating to this site are not generally applicable to other property in the same zoning classification. The alleged hardship is related to the requirements of this ordinance and has not been created by any persons presently or formerly having an interest in the land. The hardship was not created by any person presently or formerly with an interest in the land. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is located. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of the land is located. Variance Response- Submtted by Border Foods, Inc. rep, MEMORANDUM DATE: April 3,2012 TO: Tim Benetti,Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Bruce Johnson,Engineering Technician Supervisor SUBJECT: Site and Building Plan Review—Taco Bell 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard Public Works Department staff reviewed the following documents submitted for review on March 28,2012, for the proposed Taco Bell Improvements: I Civil plans sheets dated March 27,2012 Subject to final staff approval, the referenced plans must be revised in accordance with the following comments/revisions and approved prior to obtaining the required building/land alteration permit and commencing construction: 1. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City of Brooklyn Center standard specifications and details. The City's standard details must be included in the plans. 2. Upon project completion,the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures, and provide certified record drawings for any associated private and/or public improvements prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy.The survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project. 3. Inspection for the site improvements must be performed by the design/project engineer. Upon project completion and in connection with the certified as-builts,the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer's immediate and direct supervision.The engineer must be certified in the state of Minnesota and must certify all required as-built drawings. 4. An overall easement agreement is required that will provide the City accessibility to all private utilities and storm drainage areas to inspect and enforce proper utility service and maintenance for the entire site.This easement agreement includes private inspection, maintenance and reporting responsibilities and must be executed prior to issuance of building occupancy. 5. Applicant must apply for a land disturbance permit. 6. Applicant must apply for a sanitary sewer and watermain connection permit. I Taco Bell Page 2 of 3 Site and Building Plan Review Memo,March 29,2012 7. The site must be irrigated. 8. Provide vehicle turning movements for design auto in drive through. 9. Provide vehicle turning movements for delivery design vehicle from/to Brooklyn Boulevard Lane,through the points of ingress/egress and throughout the site to/from delivery location. 10.Driveways must be a minimum 50-ft apart(ordinance 35-703) 11.Provide proof that there is no encroachment in Xcel easement. SR1.0 12.The included survey needs to be signed by a professional surveyor. C1 .0 Site Plan 13. Show the location of the heavy duty pavement section. C3.0 Demolition/Erosion Control Plan 14.All erosion control measures must be installed and inspected by the City prior to any demolition. 15.Remove the water meter prior to building demolition and return it to the City. i 16.Provide and list a storm water pollution prevention plan(SWPPP) inspector/manager with contact information that must be available within 4-hrs notification to respond to and implement SWPPP related corrective measures.If the applicant'is found to be non- responsive,the City may issue a stop work order and/or take other means necessary to correct SWPPP related issues 17. Sanitary sewer service and water service must be cut off and inspected prior to starting building demolition. 18.A sewer and water disconnect permit is required. 19.Any stock piles left on site must be stabilized after 14 days per MPCA regulation. 20. Install silt fence or other methods to protect trees that are to remain including the off-site trees located on adjacent property. 21.All inlet protection must have overflow protection. GAEngineering\Development&Planning\ACTIVE Development Projects\Taco Bell 201 l\Plan Review\120403 Plan Review Memo.doc Taco Bell Page 3 of 3 Site and Building Plan Review Memo,March 29, 2012 22. Silt fence must be installed around the entire site. 23. Change note number 5 to add sweeping"as required by the City Engineer". 24.Digital(PDF)copies of required SWPPP inspections must be sent immediately to the Engineering department. 25.Provide inlet protection in the downstream off-site storm sewer inlets. Show these locations on the SWPPP plan. i 26.Identify and label the immediate downstream water body on the SWPPP. C5.0 Utilities Plan 27.The water service must have at least 18" of clearance between pipes when it crosses the sanitary sewer service. 28.City inspection is required for the sanitary sewer and watermain connections. 29.Clean outs are required every 100' on the sanitary sewer service. 30.Ensure adequate draining aggregate under the sump catch basins. 31.Install new gate valve at the water connection point for testing purposes. 32.Further discussion and evaluation is required pertaining to the proposed storm water retention system to determine feasibility, specifically the downstream effect on pipe capacity.The trunk system is a City trunk storm sewer system located within County right-of:way(Not County);the lateral storm sewer line is the County's. 33.County and City permits are required for the storm sewer connection work within CSAH 152. The aforementioned comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Other guarantees and site development conditions may be further prescribed throughout the project as warranted and determined by the City prior to issuance of permits. G:\Engineering\Development&Planning\ACTIVE Development Projectffaco Bell 2011\Plan Review\120403 Plan Review Memo.doc TACO BELL SIGNAGE LED FLYING ARCH V VCL Associates,Inc. TACO BELL EIFS MULTICOLORED METAL CAP F EIFS BAND METAL CAP FLASHING /TRELIS PREFINISHED • _ - /METAL CAP FLASHING Architecture Interiors - T . EIFS TACO BELL TACO BELL 0931 9. JRn 91r<N Suite 200 CANOPY TRELLIS Sl Louis Part Minnesota 99019 EIFS MULTICOLORED L992..901.99fi9 1..992..511.9990 OVERHEAD DOOR rmw..clasom �-} CULTURED STONE TACO - .� BELL 5532 BROOKLYN BLVD INSULATING GLASS IN SCONCE LIGHTING SERVICE DOOR BROOKLYN CENTER,MN ALUMINUM FRAMES,TYP SSZGS 1 MAIN ENTRY ELEVATION U Gp� _ O SIDE ENTRY ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION In.,.nr an;y m.m.:van..aev dthnt .m ..a..mr an.d:�Pe,.idon aye mm I a eery 9.enem a.�nn.d ame,m.Iam d Ne SWa d Minnesota SIGNINRE: - MVE CLO REGISTIMTIO0: 11.MJ PRINTHISTORY DATE PIAM✓1NG CURA9510N REVIEW OJ]T1013 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS -_ •a[-.-�LA��^'.L�-T+t� �Srt�--_a,� j ��st��T- .-� _��c`�-'a-v� �Z � .J `�-aA -� �� -J.-�'r-. PR CT 3011.0611 �.-�r-L�"6�s..:Wit. z�. Zo__ �--�_.._Tx-E=--���-�._�: �. __a-•�.- =a _-.••T'_� - -5 a'C - .�.c-_�.-..e � "3-�5.+-z"-a��z�-. - a'- D25NTl. OM - - - - =-- - - -- -- C11cCItEG GG A-1 4 DRIVE THRU ELEVATION WCL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Associates. I n c. NEW TACO BELL TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON AN EXISTING TACO BELL RESTAURANT SITE.BUILDING WILL HAVE 48 • SEATS AND DRIVE THRU. o Bell TACO BELL:BROOKLYN CENTER,MN DRAWING ISSUE 0 CU21ENT ISSUE O NOT ISSUED LEGAL JURISDICTION: CITYOF BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 9 0 T 50 (MODIFIED) BUILDING CODE IBC,IPC,IMC,IEC,NEC,ANSI LATEST ADDITIONS 931 Wen 3, 5bem Suite 290 BUILDING AREA: 2,642 G.S.F.SEATING: 48 61.Lours Park,Minnesota QU N 55418 '04 OCCUPANCY: A2 t0`� TACO 2 TFY..952..S5411A369 TYPE SM FIRE SPRINKL ERS:RE QUIR ED. BIDDER DESIGN. to .wcia.wm TITLE BELL 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard 0 Ti.T1.O TITLE SHEET BUILDING AREA AND OCCUPANT LOAD SR SURVEY Brooklyn Center Mn NPM1 PHOTOMETRIC LAN y TYPE AREA FACTOR OCCUPANTS �PM1.0 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DINING AREA 573 NSF 15 48 SEATS WAITING AREA 138 NSF 7 20 CIVIL CORRIDOR/VESTIBULE 111 NSF 0 0 0 CID SITE PLAN 55429 RESTROOMS 133 NSF 0 0 M M LA .0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN KITCHEN 1006 NSF 200 1 C3 DEMOLITION PLAN •p1�p COOLERIFREEZER 154 NSF 0 0 1 C4.0 GRADING,DRAINAGE,AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN �8a TRASH ROOM 190 NSF 0 0 0 C5.0 UTILITIES PLAN TOTAL 2115 NSF 73 0 C60 DETAILS Taco LANDSCAPE E LID LANDSCAPE PLAN Bell PROJECT SUMMARY STRUCTURAL:FOUNDATION PLAN 0 St.o FOUNDATION PLAN 5532 Brooklyyn n Boulevard 0 S2.0 SECTIONS Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 OWNER TENANT 0 SID STRUCTURALNOTES 763-560-5203 MARVIN DEVELOPMENT III,LLC BORDERFOODS STRUCTURAL:WALLS AND ROOF 965 DECATUR AVE.NORTH 955 DECATUR AVE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY,MN 55427 GOLDEN VALLEY,MN 55427 ❑C1.0 COVER SHEET CONTACT:BARB SCHNEIDER CONTACT:BARB SCHNEIDER ❑51.0 ANCHOR BOLT PLAN PHONE:763-489-2970 PHONE:763-489-2970 ❑S2.0 WALL FRAMING PLAN ❑S2.05 WINDOW 6 DOOR SCHEDULES ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 0 S3.o ROOF FRAMING PAN WCLASSOCIATES MCCONKEY JOHNSON SOLTERMANN 0 S4.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4931 WEST 35TH STREET,SUITE 200 241 CLEVELAND AVE.SOUTH 0$4.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ST.LOUIS PARK,MN 55415 ST.PAUL,MN 55105 0 S6.0 BUILDING SECTIONS CONTACT:DEANS.MADSON CONTACT:CHRISTIAN SOLTERMANN 0 S6.0 WALL SECTIONS PHONE:952.541-9969 PHONE:651-69&5626 0 S6.1 WALL SECTIONS 0 57.0 DETAILS 1. NOTE:ANCHOR BOLTS FOR HOLD DOWNS IN THE FOUNDATION ARE EPoXYIN.GCiOPROVIDEAND PAY FOR CIVIL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL NAME ROOM NAME �ELEV LETTER 3600 HO LY SITE LANE 4931 CIVIL WEST TH 0 Al 0 FLOOR PAN `�\�`O,`�-� ALL SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED. 36D0 HOLLY LANE N.Y100 ST LOUIS PARK.STREET,SUITE 200 7y • 1 A% ELEV.SHEET PLYMOUTH,MN 55447 ST.LOUIS PARK,MN 55418 ❑q1.t DOOR 8 WINDOW ELEVATIONS 6 SCHEDULES P `,O vv 2. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE,AND ALL OTHER SHEET NUMBER CONTACT'SCOTT DAHLKE CONTACT:PATRICK SARVER E A2.0 EQUIPMENT 6 SEATING PLAN APPLICABLE CODES,STANDARDS,AND REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 4 AXX 2 O DOOR NUMBEfl PHONE:763-550-9056 PHONE:952 250 2003 0 A2.1 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE [I Aso ROOF 3. IT IS INTENDED THAT A COMPLETE OCCUPIABLE BUILDING PROJECT IS PROVIDED. �-ELEVATION NUMBER O WINDOW NUMBER/DECOR ITEM NUMBER PANELIZED BUILDING SYS. MECH./ELEC.ENGINEER N A4.O EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS vO 4. MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL,AND PLUMBING CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT TO TENANT BIDDER 3 FULLERTON BUILDING SYSTEMS INC. BIDDER DESIGN 0 A4.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 34620250TH STREET ❑A4.2 CORN ICE B EXPRESSION PANEL DETAILS DESIGN DOCUMENTATION FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. X� EXTERIOR WALL FINISH NUMBER ZN6202NGTON,MN 0 A5.0 WALLS ECTIONS e'-4• CEILING HEIGHT 0 A5.1 WALL SECTIONS 5. G.G.TO PROVIDE ASBUILT DOCUMENTS TO TENANT PRIOR TO PROJECT CLOSE OUT. CONTACT:DAN-3128 KRANZ XQ KEYNOTE PHONE:507-37&3129 ❑A52 WALL SECTIONS 6. ALL MECHANICAL,ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MECHANICAL, BLDG.SECTION LETTER 0 A53 WALL SECTIONS ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING ITEMS PER CODE. ® EQUIPMENT NUMBER PROJECT DIRECTORY 0 A5,4 STRUCTURAL DETAILS TACO BELL TOWER AXX 0 A5.5 STRUCTURAL DETAILS TACO BELL TOWER 0 7. THE GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION(A.I.A.LATEST EDITION)AREA PART OF BLDG.SECTION SHEET O ROOM FINISH NUMBER A5 CANOPY 6 AWNING BLOCKING ELEVATIONS 0 A THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS.A COPY IS ON FILE AT THE ARCHITECTS OFFICE. 0 A6 s I.6 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS . CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DETAIL NUMBER a S. DUE TO THE NATURE OF THE WORK,ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN SHALL BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. % ❑Pb.2 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.SHOP DRAWINGS N(.% -DIRECTION OF DETAIL a INTERIOR ELEVATION DESIGNATION 0A6.3 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Developed by: SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO FABRICATION OF ANY ITEM.FAILURETO DETAILSHEET 0 A6.5 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ❑A6.5 FLOOR FINISH PLAN Border Foods ADHERE TO THIS PROCEDURE SHALL PLACE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY ERRORS DIRECTLY UPON THE CONTRACTOR. ® REVISION NUMBER ID SHEAR WALL TYPE(STRUCTURAL) 0 ATI REEL TED CEILING PLAN Hrr 9. INFORMATION CONCERNING EXISTING BUILDING STRUCTURE,SIZE,LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT,FINISHES,ETC. 0 AT2 FINISH SCHEDULE 7-0' ❑P6.0 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT DINING ROOM WAS OBTAINED FROM VARIOUS PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING.EVERY EFFORT HAS $'� '-'-'- BLDG. PO ® EQUIPMENT/FIXTURE NUMBER(M.E.P.) 0 AB.1 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS,RESTROOMS,b OFFICE F BEEN MADE TO ACCURATELY DEPICT EXISTING CONDITIONS,HOWEVER ALL WORK MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THESE PLANS AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS 0 A6.2 IN TERIOR ELEVATIONS KITCHEN olden Valle IN 54 SHALL BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY TO THE ARCHITECT FOR VERIFICATION AND/OR CORRECTION. REFER TO STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL FOR SPECIFIC SYMBOLS ❑AB.3 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS KITCHEN Golden Valley MN 55427 4 GENERAL DRAWING SYMBOLS 10. DO NOT SCALE THESE DRAWINGS.VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD.ANY ❑SPECIFICATIONS DISCREPANCIES IN THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ereby cemry inat th.Plan was Pre9ared by me or r STARTING WORK IN BOOK FORMAT.NOTE SPECIFICATION PROTOTYPICAL under myaked supervision and 1-lamaduly 1 y- VERIFY WITH OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. Tremetl amnilea under lrK laws Pltne SlaleG 0 11.'ALL PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE BORDER FOODS,IN WRITING,PRIOR TO ❑SCOPE OF WORK INSTALLATION. I'•',y T -. - IN BOOK FORMAT.NOTE SCOPE OF WORK IS ---w t ,� - PROTOTYPICAL VERIFY WITH OWNER PRIOR TO 3PnaNre: 12. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CAUTION IN DEMOLITION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION.ANY _-li Da.e Cud ` -TSua-1__'`�X' R CONSTRUCTION. Name: u ITEM STRUCTURAL IN NATURE AND SCHEDULED FOR DEMOLITION IN THIS DRAWING BUT NOT IDENTIFIED AS _ I 'C•`,�"4° - STRUCTURAL IN NATURE SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DEMOLITION.BY FAILURE TO DO -s. - 1' Repkbaton. t4 683 U 80,THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH ACTION. 1 I T'fi 1 rT 1 PmRG COntar4 dean Madson MECHANICAL 95254t9969 13. G.C.IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTAL PAYING FEES AND OBTAINING ALL PERMITS ASSOCIATED WITH THEM �, _ -I._„ BIDDER DESIGN Pnane Number'. PROJECT.THIS INCLUDES,BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL PLUMBING,FIRE SPRINKLER, .Try t © '. Prim Hinny die HOOD ANSUL OR OTHER RELATED FIRE PERMITS,ENCROACHMENT PERMIT,ETC.G.C.REQUIRED TO PAY FOR _ �- :. PLUMBING PLAN NING COMM REVIEW 03.23.2012 TEMPORARY FACILITIES FEES AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE WORK INATIMELY MANNER ". U {! .� BIDDER DESIGN ~I 14. G.C.SHALL PROVIDE EACH SUBCONTRACTOR WITH A COMPLETE AGENCY-PERMITTED DRAWING SET AT TIME y OF CONSTRUCTION. fr'� ELECTRICAL `0 15. IT IS THE G.C.S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONFIRM THE AVAILABLE'RESIDUAL'WATER PRESSURE,PRIOR TO THE �� BIDDER DESIGN �- ml START OF ANY WORK,AND NOTIFY THE OWNER IF THE AVAILABLE PRESSURE IS NOT ADEQUATE TO SERVICE - T - 1: 9 THE ANSUL SYSTEM OR OTHER PRESSURE SENSITIVE EQUIPMENT. fi•' +'r ~ FIRE SUPPRESSION ry 16. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING TRIM AND SURFACES AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A -f rn.'I H , - U_ -�� BIDDER DESIGN PLUMB AND TRUE SURFACE SUITABLE FOR THE APPLICATION OF NEW WALL FINISHES. _ I,A^ ' '.4p 11f1,� 17. ALL ABBREVIATIONS INCLUDED FOLLOW INDUSTRY STANDARDS.CONTACT ARCHITECT IF ANY ABBREVIATIONS !�[^ New Building ARE NOT CLEAR. +- �' - T-50,48 Seats:2,642 SF 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SHORE AND/OR UNDERPIN EXISTING WORK AS REQUIRED TO SAFELY INSTALL NEW o WORK.THIS WORK SHALL BE THE FULL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO ACT,DIRECTION OR 1� � `-• : � TITLE SHEET REVIEW OF ANY SYSTEM OR METHOD BY THE ARCHITECT SHALL CHANGE OR AFFECT THE CONTRACTORS ~ a RESPONSIBILITY IN THIS MATTER.DEFLECTION OF EXISTING TO BE UMITED TO I1W IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN INTEGRITY OF STRUCTURE. 19. GC SHALL SUPPLY AND INSTALL ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THIS DRAWING SET UNLESS " Pmiea 2ott D6.t1 OTHERWISE NOTED. pain DSM PROJECT GENERAL NOTES VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX `be eO a T1.0 TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER R L S No.1419 • ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: BORDER FOODS COMPANIES 965 Decatur Ave.N 1 gnck Bulldln9 1 Golden Valley, MN 55427 )s�emmergank' 1 40 1 ���/ �v ease.9e 1• esa.ss 3 1 e9e.! escs° ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey g ° 'Ina undenyrM nemry unleabacrdw Ford;COmmeratl ParNem mea,LLC as a9enib Stewart TNe GUwany LmnparryxsN m,� 1m 1 _ rr B°2501"t'j1 "" cis .- NspMbNa auvry maDdated NOVemnn 10.2011•MiOeE'ALTA/ACSM LanETYe Survey nY La GUrv•ys Wmlvny lne,ashAave: m� °xi° m1n �' 4 m92° 1 1 J59.2 � a� S 1 IA Nat(.) ,1aika dNe 8MI oown:nH a'j kAJy mbI d.dar d.d r:Rell M:mam Swdam Dew v.� �' x cP•�m Rwarert.3.4.6ALTNACSM Land TSm sla.16.17,r esmbfshed wdatlml(Idp ALTA arm NSPS:ap1l,Whdudn E 'k�n9 D5>•rI �ASl.M 1 Okrn1.20.•.8rds a,Y(ndad by ALTAa1a.1 ardd 19a TaN.Alnat,d In)pmsuantb Pe - i •�l rat e5659 Aq I, pwdamsn•doge as -and NSPS0.S..amt M dd•awf ommtaem,vmupdersyaf..anaamrn w.0 wlh my pmrnalma ognbn,nalanesurvey).wSore aM:newm,Na Rdaaw P-plyA aryaN:survry don 2, 1 notfx in w th. bi.p pp" lc)Ne map aM SUrvry an wnlm e:nasal mmpry r4tlrLappfonm mwsaN. 1 Y ' C59' lubdC:o n wNm N•wbpre DmpnrY K 1 e39.sS 3 1 a yurfabe E553 (eamtNaw v,raap pr�,, a^.ra.naN•m.ompard: tya.xro.Nan1g: Statement of Encroachments � , � a5°. � m,nPaf , � �, ` 1 (a)Na NSdag,mepwunuip,p n0al;aal, wperv:ne and conbalaNe undtlayn.afmmneckwlmmaraa wryer .Se b' esd 70 nsbeanmemmrnaamamavmp•MlewNanaoam.arc N� •a .._el..�r 1 ese.69 SCI ;tar a. fNl Na NeN eemanaoecnrnnnetlmr aeon popery oast«mrm9dwla caws«rasuwen:wNerteaaasr ants Subject property wall encroaches into Service Drive n es9s9 .1� 1 J, ��'e \\ ,5"iw,; _ I 1 5>2r \1 1 qA5 1 , (1)Nn aurv.y mapp *d.....w.nd maw tllvlaHm a,-ad e.nm.ma,,yras-or+s'vyI." rte mskbW 1 ro en'.r O a ase�a• 1 aw-`t`"'n >. me a­af.can nufN•dwaN•.rw.r and-aaw.dM°Nnrron«s.ff"".fst•dm see ivuranomm4Nentr.mb•rw � o S� - ,.. -rg5 �` •-� w s>.e ? rimr0ar 34]85 woad b/NeCmmeraalPnNam lam,LLCdama oapbw Zl,ID11; 4�e1e.92 .a.W'e GIB 9t�2r ...• ~ l'O9't e° £ a %,)m r 1 td)tlW:ear au4akm Npen aal a,na1b ft pmpedy-sad epnnAad by BrooNym 8M6 Lane Rrw4 F)upm ` av�eea.32 .92 3 m � �„ -_ ,x.95 YOnc ra tC'� � b N �Q wn:nne sugea papeny,w:.N.same be+rp pased+nd mnfpwnm«pawd.na lasamwaye l..anpmPd4p aa.w,n °AsFr g • :i - ` ese.s - 'O ,5.a $ �� Q 1 mwNm ae POPwy wrvryed nnnamwm NHarnK .. - `'.. ;a••- '� -1s3 0va)Na no ponlmame pmp.ry wrv.yea mkamuemanem aap�umdn.spemur-maHmra Ame nrN•une.e sow �-� •:.�e.o9. n„t•.� o Z _ D.p.mm�talausmp era um,n Dwtlopnm.ndwpmpvysavryee ru:.zae x.n.m.ammmumnoodrre otes � ��« � ulldrn9 v,N � � 1 Miscellaneous 1 m 1 _ e5e.c j-5tory B II, " mR (7Nw N.pawdr ar.vered dcea cat s.vke wradp::p vrpPadr�drekmpa:yreaa,ao�.«ary aNaappama pmpns. &� m vrJ mr�e5e.99 1 ',, ®�,:•. l etdy o-aa°b ?aeo n' L Eacept sa raw beat,, sic °g °' .+-a+s.ss �l Rl I.)Naar.odd,n a.aowm an w wnwy map.an..rat mnetwm w aqa wnev:mn scam wmn.w.mw«lood ommy MN 7 Property Address:5532 Brooklyn Blvd.,Brooklyn Center,MN &' to _ >: °�•• vary ordnen«n Property identification number 03-118-21-01-0014 _ - 'rA la)Ntlew:rd.ndnr4nedm Ne wrvry mep,mntimw nee Nan ono parFd viol Noe aempeps.porn«ebys: 1 O u .•a, w` Q • m • C 213 �'� °55 fait Nw NS we.nOkSWnsE On wswaeY maP mns:mdtwpeaa wNm:easpmmamm.arrvry amp:r•w•afum �•C rR o1 3 _ Dag - ,s. ti SD.9 55. 1 MN2 Area of parcel is 26480 s4H 061 aces Ierm p.s wenm am omnmpwHsk aril mwww w�(s)Im worm sum lsrxF,Md O P (• ) �. c1 � � •. A (�Naroe w.miyr.d:amp:mme:ml.a rv.y«mp.ey do:p wrvay basses roil:Yood amrrdiq n Ne Smledkr MN3 m D ,t` � 1 o Leg al description and easements par commitment from Commercial Partners Title,LLC, m 'a` ''oer5•>o2m!"4.. e5699 055,3 1 ' c. File No.34785,dated October 27,2011. swad: MN4 Property is in Flood zone x(area of minimal flooding)per FEMA map 8 _ 1S' z V es9.79 O number 27053CO212E•dated September 2,2004. 0. kr tunrnov• 1 GlporyR Prndl 1 4 � q O \ �, • b M 5ltl•o/Msn fola N0.21HC! MN Benchmark Top nut of hydrant at soutr v t quad of Northport&Brooklyn BNd.Elevation=861.971ee1 3 m Qft •,t _ - 1 '� esc Dela,l w lo.2o11 3 Q. V7 ro �n a 1 03°j2 D5>.K .7 faje•l.fs•r Np566., °5306 MN6 "°°"«°°"urfyk,o6oumm�emetldeomeaatwnNlunarvnmmwnyaar.;pnwlamserwms 1 y Q� 99 '' 1 Smva/'p•,Ie,,,,p ey. Dtl•ds- Nwmm�tgmtl pop.rny Love anampmd bne.tld kaaw Nrmgh NS aerdcea aGagerSmm ae Caf pntl last nrmeer 11330oe0i re-A ,f 4>- ro 40 lal a"ftf a.lm R•vbmns w Icon avft carpe..faled b Okla!loom und.W-1 utlNy Imab-In Nn•raau,uaen as � ? r Y 1 ; s �es>. >9a�okyir Perk,MN F.dhar lnbrmaeon-ct GopM scam 0.Lail(89t�5/-0002«811) 11 $l }�YY tat p3>.> bpye.r6 E1e°74>s d 1 1 ., MN 14'WA a5' As to Item 16 o/Table°A'minimum standard detail requirements.No evidence of current earth moving y; work construction consction a bu9ding adr➢tions. 1 \ ' 6 seat° MN8 As to Item 17 01 Table'A'minimum standard decal requirements.No Proposed changes to street � u righ(cf-way or evidence of recent street or sidewalk construction or repairs. s1 \ e59.9• MN9 A.to Item 18 of Table'A'minimum standard detail requirements.No evidence or site used as solid waste loran Nm F.a.Nn Fu.N6 .1-p or sanilary landfill. 79621 1056-35 r°era rmrraerrwp �1 H $ 6 ^"\W _ 1 I s ar 1 1 Legal t Description �� $ . Current Zoning Information Legend of Symbols&Abbreviations Saumesiaomenn:Fmnmp D^q Drya&oom nCema Tract B,Registered Land Slwey No.1419,Hennepin County,Minnesota;and an undivided 26,154/336,308ths interest in and to: Address:63x1 smile Cnak Fades ar.amok"a .MN 55430 Tads F and L Registered Land Survey No.1419,Hennepin County,Hwesota. Prop«16sss9a05 zanma nndalsk u Ianke D•aamn:cmw.�t.D:Na Note Corresponding to Schedule B,Part I of Proforma ma:ae.armps tenanted 6uaNp Sawa Ra Jna,naa Otao- R Yed Note From Yard SeNnk 80.9 Feet 95 Fetl WA SIe.Y­5•wwA 522 Faa 10 Fen O Item.41.10 not to our knowledge or note stBYey Issue. Rnr Yam SeNrA 1154Faal, 140 Fed ♦Pvccnard rlft Flow P."TabWalmn O nan 411-Right of Smma Minnesda m mnsbuct temporary.now fences m adpining larMs m Nghway OMervW R Nan 2 per doc.no2929198. ® Xm Post O Denote I-MOmarent 5e Repumr sn«a 39 an note wp�e• mr.•newa.a: wnaimwed smr>m 9 ses na. O3 Item 412-benefitscif Roadway Easement over Tracts F and!(service drive)per doc.no.954758. yye� °pi MO"�`a PO1� TaalP HwadSRaa­n 42 ovarw as shown h- �F tHAt Pyle°'"GO"'FKk°ix t OnservM Ma Mmwd Nan O1mm013-San6 arysewaeas.mentpwdmnm82l6S3dmsnotawmbwpmmrty. jr Paver F_ MaNn���mt8.4FM WA O 40 c,Jl Baron Dpypved RepuMd Nan OHem 414-Ga.­in..semen.per doc.no....does mterurmber property. o Mryr_Ne wAVtlp 8054R Okmd WA �rlread Wien oNac WA I WA O Imm HS-NSPeasemen tpndoe.no.13040196882943 e---pmpdywshoaa hereon. Samh y5eae> raM youm Ne above rararwv artopaey aril Ne appfobb aampcoon.. Noce taawssuse Nry a.rmedwfmNaNl.prsa,n aue.ppfaplecamp miles seam zd.l SCALE IN FEET • O rem 916-State of Mimesota highway don.no.914924 esMMished dgMofway of Smm Highway. watemwe as ahown hereon. Ga!arse 0 20 40 60 O Imm 417-Agreement-Roadway Easementova Tracts I and KRLS No,1209Mmaln-ceandcrermaders. Ewa 1f SR1 .0 OImm 416.De..,of S.Highway to County per doe m.203503(1 acrd any eadernanm associated with ® °°°'9/'t d Lrddug to adjecer45'p'^'4 highw y(right to construct mmpoary snow lances per doc no.2929190} Sheet 1 of 1 WCL SITE DATA: PARKING DATA: SITE PLAN NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: Associates. Inc. ZONING: C-2 COMMERCE DISTRICT PROMO O PARKIN STALLS: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION,THE CONTRACTOR • PROPOSED USE: RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH 9x19.5 and 9x18.0 29 STALLS SIDEWALK OR EXTERIOR OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND .>,•�- 'bl lAt1A) 2 STALLS GROSS LOT AREA: 26,480 SO.Fr.OR 0.61 ACRES PROVIDED TOTAL: 31 STALLS NOTED. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCATION OF EXITS, OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA(CFA 2,642 50.Fr. R IR PARKING srALLS RAMPS,CONCRETE APRONS AND STOOPS. HAS THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER (L BUILDING w.n.00TP) ) RESTAURANT WITH DANE-THROUGH FACILITY: 2. TACK SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS EDGE PRIOR TO DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 1 space per 2 seats and 1 space per 2 staff PATCHING. MATCH EXISTING GRADES. 2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERCENT BUILDING COVERAGE: 10.05 (48 seats/2)+(10 ataR/2) 3. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PARKING: 29 STALLS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. FLOOR AREA RATIO 0.0998 SEPARATED WITH A}"E%PANSION JOINT. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SET FORTH x931 West 3A r57reH 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDUIT REQUIREMENTS FOR THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION svr.xl LIGHTING, IRRIGATION, MENU BOARD,COMMUNICATION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE OF CONFLICT SHALL TAKE St tars Sark 6M10 1.o PEDESTAL, ETC WITH OWNER PRIOR TO PAVING. PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE 0 20 s0 60 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 20,598 Sq.FT. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION TH OF THE MENU BOARD ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE T.951.5x1-99fi9 (TnNT IMPERVIOUS,T ,a Po..Ek SETBACK: AND COMMUNICATION PEDESTAL WITH OWNER PRIOR TO F..gsl_sa I-sss, MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS TACO BELL CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY PERCENT AREA 77.85 PLACEMENT. DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SOILS REPORT AND PLANS. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET (x a gror,be....) 1 ocnTIDN: B NI IXN• PARKING S. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE 3. SITE CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND STALL S TO BUILDING ENTRANCE(SEE ADAAG REQUIREMENTS). PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA 5,882 SO.FT. POLE MOUNT APPROVED SIGNS CENTERED ON STALLS. PAINT REMOVAL IN ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING,ACCORDANCE ETC. PUBLIC R/W BROOKLYN BLVD 40' 1s' INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY ON STALL 4. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE PERCENT LANDSCAPE AREA: 2235 PRIVATE DRIVE 10' 0' 7. CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER ADAAG AND WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE (x of grow bt arc,) (BROOKLYN BLVD LANE) RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. MNDOT STANDARDS. PROVIDE CONTRASTING DETECTABLE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ODE D' WARNING STRIP. SITE PLAN BASED ON SURVEY INFORMATION DATED NOVEMBER 10,2011 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH FIRE REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL SOFT,YIELDING OR PROVIDED BY LOT SURVEYS COMPANY,INC. MARSHAL FOR POSTING OF FIRE LANES,CURB MARKING AND UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE \ Tract B,Registered Land Survey No.1419, SIGNAGE IF NEEDED. A COMPACTION AS SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT Hennepin County,d Land and o.1419, 9. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL A COMPACTION REPORT PREPARED THE A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER, LICENSED WITHIN THE STATE WHERE OF ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES THAT INTERFERE WITH NEW TACO 28, 154/336tst.re s interest in and to:Tracts WORK AS SHOWN. THE WORK IS PERFORMED, S WITHIN THAT ALL FILLED F and I,Registered Land Survey No. 1419, AREAS AND SUBGRADE AREAS WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD Hennepin County,Minnesota. vomw9 U1 co AND PAVEMENT AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPACTED IN 1 K G/ ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND •• ( SITE LEGEND: RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. Taco 5. THE LOCATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES (1 Z SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS -! 40 1 HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. IT SHALL BE Bell I �'� 'g ' THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE G al `��..-�' VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES V,C ' \ +°pr� "-'-'��� ro ;�1� a� g 1 LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PRIOR O STARTING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR MN 55429 FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR TO THESE FACILITIES CAUSED Brooklyn Center, 11 22 i ` CONCRETE PAVEMENT BY HIS WORK FORCE 763-560-5203 ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE 1 C1 n •Oa I , ,•e�.ar '�i r a° ------ B612 CURB AND GUTTER PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR - 1 ,.' !C "y8°25 20 13. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 3 + 8612 OUTFLOW CURB AND CUTTER TACO BELL CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF ANY 13 - 25 ' DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH t` �ti/ p EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE BE Itl 14 20 R6, 1 z1 PARKING COUNT TO THE CO NNTRACTOR FORMWORK THAVING TOL BE RAEDONE I zr• 17 DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY t`�i 21 1 31 1 11l rn a y TRAFFIC DIRECTION ARROWS ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN 24 12 1 IO `1 2 � ` �r LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION GIVEN. �\�9. -.1 a < ra• KEY NOTES O 1 �� 0 _ 1 �y 1 " BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AS - 13 Y 22 z 1Z1 SPECIFIED BELOW: s PH I T PANN•S CTION MnDOT • t l ( 14 7 lr ,� Q1 O (PARKING LOT ONLY) HEAVY DUTY LIGHT Ol1TY SPECIFICATIONS C13 22 ` P �� ; BIT.BASE COURSE 2- 1.1/2 SPNWB23OB,MnDOT 2360 Developed by: 25 � � Q AGGREGATE BASE(CL 5) 6• 6• 2211 P •1 1 COMPACTION DENS"BETWEEN 95%AND 1005 OF THE MARSHALL z , Border Foods DENSITY. 1005 FOR AGGREGATE BASE 2. {, ''��VJJ,1 t W► 6 �fFg� y l ROIL ENGINEER RECOMMENDATION �IPERSEDE A.OVE LIED SPECS, 965 Decatur Ave North ` B612(67 CONCRETE CURB At GUTTER.MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SUPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT Golden Valley MN 55427 \, If•` l' �� ' 1 3 1 1` rn O 2461 MIX 3Y32A MANUAL PLACEMENT. to .; i 21 ©� �\ 1�. -` ' 1� , O 8612(67 CONCRETE OUTFLOW CURB 8 GUTTER.(TIP-OUT FLOWUNE).MnDOT 2467 MIX 3Y22A 10 I �/` 11YY-yam SUPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A MANUAL PLACEMENT. Contact Barb Phone: 763-4889-299-29 70 0 ((11 O SENSOR LOOP. SEE DETAIL SHEET.CONFIRM WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 3 1 , ° 1 e •�``� - 1` 2 , O CONCRETE SIDEWALK.WIDTH VARIES. SEE DETAIL SHEET PED RAMP PER STANDARD SIDEWALK RAMP DETAIL SEE DETAIL SHEET FOR MNDOT STANDARD PLATE 7035F. 10 1 , CoNUllml 19 '4 A 24 PAINT INTERNA710NAL SYMBOL OF ACCE554BNTY-WHITE LATEX PAINT. sns ca„mn,gxn rrn,e rsrrrua sn 1 7 = t1 , 1 t ` / i / C ) CIVIL ENGINEERING g$ l ` p 14 6'CONCRETE PAVEMENT W 6"X6"- 10 10 W.W.M. CONST.JTS O 12'O.C. OVER 4"CLASS 5 1 , 1 y- �s• B AGGREGATE BASE.MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A SITE DESIGN �. 28 - MANUAL PLACEMENT.SOUS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LASTED SPECS. , 5 15 1' xt �s I - '`-`t N- 4� s , 13 , O ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN(MNDDT i'S R7-84 AND R7-88).CENTER SIGN ON PARKING STALL �% ?w •10 T 4 s 21 7. t•. �y 2 3,. $ 1 LOCATION PER GENERAL CONTRACTOR.MOUNT ON 6"CONCRETE BOLLARD. SEE DETAIL SHEET. iw.. • 1 ''' -�_ 25 g- le GREEN AREA-SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN. 6 o Il T �� 1 11 TRANSFORMER PAD BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR.INSTALL PER UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. relp wt f gry-a by arrP.aficr 16n T gadwm,:ditI uyU ngdrea ' 11 '� 40 , 12 PAINT 4-WIDE SOLID STRIPE-WHITE. Enghl uneelftliexea(ve�d 1 23 � ' Mnnrrm Q CD , l3 PLANT TRAFFIC ARROWS-WHITE. p,y:yd Nagq: SCOTT DAHIXE AN 1 1 19 20 '� -� {pHrsWe N PAINT 24"HIGH LOITERS-WHITE filgnd- ;, •� \ ° j.�--` ,50,9 Gl(R�"lot i 15 PAINT 12-WIDE SOLID CROSSWALK STRIPING-WHITE. �: 0ynry2 Up-M 24348 PLANT 24"WIDE SOLID STRIPE-WHITE. •, N•4 tT1 r•� CLEARANCE BAR INSTALLED BY SIGN COMPANY. FOUNDATION BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR SEE ARCHITECT PUNS FOR DETAILS. MENU BOARD AND SENSOR LOOP INSTALLED BY SIGN COMPANY. FOUNDATION BY GENERAL Prnl Nttwy lax Z T.Cl 1B CONTRACTOR. VERIFY SIZE WITH SUPPLIER. SEE ARCHITECT PLANS FOR DEINLS. PLANNING COMA REVIEW 0737.2D12 �� 19 PriON POLE SIGN. SEE SICK PERMIT DRAWINGS FOR FOR SIGN.POLE.AND POLE BASE DETAILS. - ``l1 O LIGHT POLE.REFER TO LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR LIGHT LOCATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. FOUNDATIONS 13Y GENERAL CONTRACTOR. VERIFY FOUNDATION SIZE WITH SUPPUER. - 2t GUARD POST BOLLARD. SEE DETAIL SHEET. INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: O CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON PER CITY STANDARDS. 23 MATCH EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK. C1.0 SITE PLAN 2+ BRICK PAVERS ON SAND. SEE LANDSCAPE PUN. NeWB7lid'Ing PROPERTY OWNER: ARCHITECT: CIVIL ENGINEER: C2.0 SIGNS.MOUNTED ON 6-CONCRETE BOLLARD. SIGNS TO BE PLACED BACK TO BACK ON T-50,48 Seats:2,642 SF C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SAME BOLLARD. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE LOCATION. BORDER FOODS, INC. WCL ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING SITE DESIGN, LLC O a)'STOP'SCAN SITE PLAN CONTACT: BARB SCHNEIDER CONTACT: DEAN MADSON CONTACT: SCOTT DAHLKE C3.0 DEMOLITION PLAN b)'DO NOT ENTER'SIGN 965 DECATUR AVENUE NORTH 4931 W. 35TH ST, STE 200 118 EAST BROADWAY ST., PO BOX 566 C4.0 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 26 10'x10'-6"CONCRETE COLLAR AT MANHOLE CASTINGS. JOINT AS SHOWN. • GOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55427 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 MONTICELLO, MN 55362 C5.0 UTILITIES PLAN 27 BIKE RACK.SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. Preen 1a11.06.17 PH (763) 489-2970 PH (952) 541-9969 PH (763) 314-0929 FX (763) 489-2971 FX (952) 541-9554 www.civilesd.com cs.o DETAILS 2B TRASH ROOM, SO C1 .0 CESDI'M x90397 TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER WCL Associates. Inc. • 4931 W935.SVtet Silt 200 S Lan Pw''Mnnatdn SSte T.952.SCI. " F..953..5/1.9554 0 20 40 60 .n.n,.nt can GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEEr Benchmark:Top nut of hydrant at southwest quad of Northport 8 Brooklyn Blvd. Elevation=861.97 feet 0uild'n9 ELI. 1 1-5 ganK 1 Survey information provided by: Lot Surveys Company,Inc. TACO 1 yam' 40 Dated: November 10,2011 Bell 6 � / �. �3e• ��1 4��5 $ 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 763-560-5203 Tract B,Registered Land Survey No. 1419, g. uGF ,. 1 Hennepin County,Minnesota; and an undivided in� •°-• „ ,,..,n. �7•�' e5G.39 26,154/336,308ths interest and to: Tracts F and I,Registered Land Survey No. 1419, Hennepin County,Minnesota. t •� 1`1 a 'i1 lI 1 .oD a3e.se bi tum_ Sri 70 1 s � ` SURVEY LEGEND: w's� °° 9.e." ,.� •. 6O�.D Ra..m �eD � �3� Q Developed by: n �1 _� 1 ® ® Catch basins Border Foods ° ,` -.Q.-,• b 1 - asaG � ,qu,IdN9 tT 965 Decatur Ave North / Hydrant Golden Valley MN 55427 rn r M7 fo 7z it _ '' Contact Barb Schneider ° 41 Q Light standard Phone: 763-489-2970 M3 ,�li 55.05 Gas main t D t—• 3 ,S •fit• FO D5723 D3699 ,i e959 Caos"It y DS]3 1 Sanitary sewer c)vu ENGINEERING DESIGN Storm sewer ° � o u ; 057.fF ,tails D56.91 Y. f V•a L $ U1 � � $ 1 . p5D.3a 7 r,,k,n9 ' �� 1 Itwiby taiQy9eltlitwM199BdEmAai,IX Watermain tt�D.�9a�IX b ° .... 1. , m3 3 °tali• 3574] Ica .�'` ' AO - ` 4 nD- r d �7-7D�„_,,. 1 1 eeam6IXmemna�emtea .°nq �8 N 1 G ,57. ,.y" j4,�.E16474 „°�, —W—W--W Overhead wires scoT WARE �3 s u 1 \ N 78' IuDAnr r eiwoma.: 1 ` a .Spa FnU�lot 1 -uGP Underground electric or. mrm+2 u99�.k 2aae w � 8 es9.94 a °�. g 1 %.� oa. �` PLVJNOJG COMM REVIEW 09.272012 L. Rte..... INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: C1.0 SITE PLAN C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN New Building T-50,48 Seats:2,642 SF C3.0 DEMOLITION PLAN C4.0 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS • PLAN C5.0 UTILITIES PLAN C6.0 DETAILS P.j. 291106.11 cma m C2.0 CESUPrc9eci:00391 TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER KEY NOTES W C L DEMOLITION NOTES: Associates. Inc. OREMOVE EXISTING BUILDING/STRUCTURE.. 1. Do not begin demolition until perimeter sediment controls are in place. O2 REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB k GUTTER. measures Provide air quality control measures at the request of the Engineer or City Representatives. Take necessary measures to keep dust levels to a minimum. Provide sweeping of adjacent paving as needed. O REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 3. Use approved inlet protection at oil active storm sewer inlets. Refer to details. 4. Locate and protect all utility lines prior to and during demolition. Utility locations shown are based on best O REMOVE EXISTING UGHTPOLE available information and are not guaranteed.Contact private utility service for disconnection and removal, F. .,le.lure 5. Obtain all necessary permits for demolition of existing buildings. OS REMOVE EXISTING TREES AND LANDSCAPE FEATURES. 6. Remove or relocate oil existing structures and objects that interfere with the proposed construction. Anteriors. O SALVAGE SIGN CASE AND PANELS FOR SIGN VENDOR.REMOVE EXISTING POLES AND BASE. 7. Verify location of water and sanitary service.Cap lines at proposed connections per utility plan and remove pipes to the existing building. COORDINATE WITH UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDER FOR RELOCATION,DISCONNECTION,TEMPORARY CAP 8. Remove demolition debris within 24 hours.Brokerage of salvaged material is not permitted on site. st wax m.Sawn Oal AND/OR REMOVAL AS NECESSARY. 9. Protect existing site features during construction. Replace anything damaged with new construction. O 'I' 55 10. Pavement shall be sow cut of limits of removal unless noted otherwise. Removal may occur at nearest s Louis REMOVE EXISTING MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL. nnesae construction joint beyond limit at no cost to the owner. sass ODISCONNECT AND REMOVE EXISTING WATER SERVICE AND PROVIDE TEMPORARY CAP.PROVIDE FOR 11. Do not impede existing traffic circulation to adjacent businesses or streets. T.9s2 511-99e9 9 EXTENSION PER UTIUtt PLAN C.S.O.LOCATION SHOWN FOR EXISTING WATER SERVICE IS 12. Sufficient topsoil shall be stockpiled to allow for the replacement of 4°of topsoil for disturbed areas to be F..s32..3a1-9531 APPROXIMATE CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO FIELD LOCATE AND ADJUST AS NECESSARY. re-vegitated. 0 20 40 60 DISCONNECT AND REMOVE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AND PROVIDE TEMPORARY CAP. PROVIDE 13. All construction and post-construction parking shall be on-site. At no time shall parking, loading, or ---- ° unloadin be allowed on public streets la FOR EXTENSION PER UTILITY PLAN C5.0.LOCATION SHOWN FOR EXISTING SANITARY SEWER WATER 9 Pu SERVICE Is APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO FIELD LOCATE AND ADJUST AS NECESSARY. 14. Contractor shall not obstruct public sidewalks of any time. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 15. Storage of materials or equipment shall not be allowed within public Right-of-Way. OPROTECT EXISTING SIDEWALK IN PLACE CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGED SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT AT NO COST TO OWNER. 0 12 DRIVEWAY APRON. Benchmark:Top nut Of hydrant at southwest REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DR quad of Northport&Brooklyn Blvd. p PROTECT EXISTING TREE Elevation=861.97 feet 1/ PROTECT EXISnNG UTILITY RISER IN PUCE ; ` IS PROTECT EXISnNG SIGN ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. O,JIIEm9 w e. O Survey information provided by: REMOVE MISCELLANEOUS EXISTING ITEMS AND FOUNDATIONS:I.E., MENU BOARD, } f.;,taNengsnk• ,\ TACO 16 ORDER POST,METAL FENCE AND POSTS. -N. 1166 ,� ' Lot Surveys Company,Inc. I i666..r�! 6 '- aG Dated: November 10,2011 Bell 14 13 ,F.owe• .,. q p 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard v ,�� =rte �*• B Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 763-560-5203 1 'INSTALL TREE ,, ` " rah ✓ ' g°' � 1 � Tract B,Registered Land Survey No. 1419, Aa PROTECTION FENCE 1I�g AS NECESSARY \j� 4 �` 'yi �y 1 Hennepin County,Minnesota;and an undivided ,_, 1 � �1�,, � .�'— 7 rr r,,,,,, •` „'. °" '1 �, 26,154/336,308ths interest in and to: .+170 CS1 1 Tracts F and I,Registered Land Survey No. 1419, rA Hennepin County,Minnesota. 4 P 8 0 syn.TO-1 �70 7 1O 3 !cos t 1 .e e--nays..•�p s/°.^oe ,...-�asmsti_:z >o, 1 ,.,-! 1 a l GA-11 B r l y @ B \ SCC77 SURVEY LEGEND:' ,, AID • 1It Developed by. Catch basins Border Foods < �r9 •� },mss �., y + Hydrant Gold nValeyMN55427 a 15 e` mw i V i 1.. 10 �1a ["f' Contact Barb Schneider B _ �'sy� 1 1e Light standard Phone: 763489-2970 j1 Q ,L �%1-• ¢- `�g .,- -�`;,� tC �,=111 , i —.,—u—�_ Gas main (P 7e ,'$ § i�} it i�a �,°"• ;g,:°`�'��s'ro 1 y ' , s Coswulgi q1 }I 4°` '? •-< 1,las.:Y ,,' � �� 2 ^',e,ee �'�'''` 3'+tu,s.o. —u Sanitary sewer CIVILINGIIEERING ­53 z pace ex 4 } SITE DESIGN -- Storm sewer 2 w t L. / T rf;Y.,n9 7 �- L,jQiA �..PV.P e l 1 2 IM`1 m��'eet ypkn.,pldaawd Q ,�f'�2 \,! , l- 1•n IV repottw,pnpme0lry newuMw m7 direa F 1:� 1 N ,1 .P ass 5 sH t ^"; -' sir f� ° �.1 —I Watermain atpavlsbnwd Vxslwadu!i U.m d 1�0 1 t t ,al { '1 ,r/-��"51 .10 Eralnar xmeM Uee Ssleof 1 b 1�& r ��� e I'n� 1 � Mfimai '1 $,.� } � =� D36f6,P..--a'.". 'I,I^' 15 P�eNd K.m°: bb A SCOTT DAH/E o �� �a a °0v" 811474 rr w-1 —w— Overhead wires 15 'rare ` Big.— S Caw Egdl� m \ 2.319 ��mlot —uOP— Underground electric a : MM112 Lknr.R 19 a esss+ 1 Dew PWJNPIO COMM REVIEW 07273012 qt1 Wit 1 1r14�ut . INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: : CI-0 SITE PLAN C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN New Building T-50,48 Seats:2,642 SF C3.0 DEMOLITION PLAN DEMOLITION C4.0 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN PLAN C5.0 UTILITIES PLAN • C6.0 DETAILS Prdra s^++^%.1+n�] a.drea sD C3.0 cESDPrai.a:om9s TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER SVVPP NARRATIVE EROSION CONTROL NOTES EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SCHEDULE EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE SITE LEGEND: W C L This project will ec nsisl of grading and reconstruatlan of the buik6ng 1. All device necessary to control erosion and 1. Silt fence shall be installed or restored prior 10 1. Erosion control measures shall be inspected by the x-.._.es 1-ND SPOT EU ATCN Associates. Inc. pad and parking bl far o Taco Bell Restaurant sediment(I.E.perimeter silt fence,rock any construction. Silt fence shall be located as contractors representative and mai tained by the construction entrances,swales,ponds,berms.ETC.) shown to intercept runoff-The area located beyond contractor every Friday and within 24 hours after ---_-_------ -_:.-- MISTING CURB AND GUTTER First,perimeter silt fence and rock constriction entrance shall be shall be installed prior to any other construction the perimeter sill fence shall Fiat be disturbed any rainfall event larger than 1/2"until the - installed. Then demolition of 'sting building and parking lot shall tlore. during construction. project is com leted. Maintenance is _„ _...>.___.___ opera p fight of fence IX5TNG STORM SEWER commerce. The contractor shall dfaDosa demolition debris off-site 2. Alter completion of rough grading,exposed aoBa 2. Rock ConsWction Entrance shall be installed prior are as follows:silt fence- 1/3 height of fence within 24 hours. 'hen the site can be graded and utilities installed. must Dn stabilized with temporary seed and mulch to grading operations. or damaged,remove sediment and/or repair fence 'x 899.25 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION Once final grade is established and certified.the site shall be within 14 days. 3. Al storm sewer inlets shall have inlet within 24 hours; ock enkronce-refresh oa stabilized with seed and mulch o sod. Once vegetation is 3. After completion of final grading,exposed soils protection inserts installed. Inserts shall be necessary to conform to detal;inlet protection 2g`2x PROPOSED FLOW DIRECTION AND SLOPE established,temporary erasion control measures sholl be removed. must b!permanenty stabilized within 14 days- 'Rood rain-Top Slab'or"Road Drain-Curb& inserts-remove sediment after each rain event. Stabilization shall consist of disc-anchored seed& Gutter"inlet protection devices as clean or replace filter when clogged;surface water =-------- PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER mulch or sod. -drain and stabilize.within 7 days of discovery: 4. The site must be kept in o wail drained condition manufactured by WIMCO(or approved equal) re ��- ---_� PROPOSED TIP OUT CURB 4911 WesI3aM1 9raw p and street sw ping- move all sediment track all times. The cc tractor shall be es Bible and installed per manufacture's SPwi,, r con onto pored sun, within 24 hours or as directed s.Laud Pwk Mma.som POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES for all tlitchas,or other means nece feCOTTendatian9. -DC PROPOSED CORM SLIVER porary ssanu by Cily Engineer. Sots to ensu proper drainage. The building pad at 4. All erosion control installations shall remain in 2, Replacement- Fabric shall be replaced promptly Solid waste;collected sediment,asphalt and concrete millings, be Provided with a positive outflow. This work place and be maintained in good condition by the when it decomposes or becomes ineffective before EN ®['� `A l= FROPOSED SILTFENCE vnTN ORANGE COLOR p 2p qp 60 r.952.sal-99Eg floating debris•paper,plastic.fabric.construction debris and other shall be incidental to the grading contract. controclor until the site has been re-vegetated,at the barrier is no longer necessary. F.952.SII 955a wastes must be disposed of properly off-site and must comply with 5. Entering/exiting of the site shall Occur Only of which time it shall be r moved by the contractor. J. Any sediment emaininq in place after silt fence is J INLET PROTECTION ..vAV cad.seam MPCA requirements. rock construction entrance to reduce tacking f For proposed paved surface areas,the contractor no longer required hall be dressed to conform GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET dirt onto paved streets. Sediment tracked onto may remove necessary silt fencing to construct with the existing grada,prepared, d seeded with -0 O LIMITS OF CONSRUMON Hazardous moll-kia:03,gasoline,point and any hazardous streets during working hours must be reclaimed via roadway,while emaintaining adequate erosion control appropriate seed mix,as directed by the engineer. substance must be property stand.including secondary containment street scraping and sweeping of the end of each in adjacent areas. 4. Removal of the silt fence-Silt fences shall be Benchmark:Top nut of hydrant at to prevent spills,leaks or other discharge. Restricted access to working day, 5. Sufficient topsoil shall be stockpiled to allow for removed when they hove served their useful storage a s mu.be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and the replacement of 4"topsoil for disturbed areas upward sloping southwest quad of Northport€. disposal must be in c purpose,but not before the ea p Omphance with NPCA regulations. to be re-vegetated. has been permanently stabilized.11f the upward Brooklyn Blvd. B. The contractor shall schedule site grading,utility sloping area is to be exposed longer than six(6) External washing of trucks or other construction vehicles is not installation and roadway construction sa that the months,that area shall be covered with temporary Elevation=861.97 feet allowed on site. No engine degreasing is allowed on site.No general site can be mulched and re-seeded soon vegetation when first exposed. concrete washouts arc allowed on site. after disturbance. Areas that will not be subject to construction tranic shall be seed and mulched or sodded within 14 days of being disturbed. TKO �gud61n9 1 �4 - I-5to,yTmU ganll t' I SEED AND MULCH SCHEDULE ��CO L.!3 l.7ri 1. al disturbed areas shall be covered with a ' minimum 4"lopsol. Unless areas are to be Bell 40 ?� sodded.MnDOT seed mix 250 shall be applied at CENERAi GRsf�ING NOTES: v�j 75 Ibs/ac. MnDOT Type 1 mulch shall be applied 1. Specifications opplcable for this project. Current standard specifications for at 2 tons/ac and disc anchored. Seeding and Brooklyn Center, MN,and the latest Minnesota Department of Transportation •jam e.,�e _ =--'- tlj 1 mulching shall conform to the latest NPDES Specifications for Highway Construction and all NPTES requirements except where p g ay q P 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard to grodinq�s for installation schedule with regards modified by these contract documents. .10 i 2. Fertilizer shall be 8-12-6 and applied at 300 2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project. Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 p 1, /' n v Ibs/are. Disc fertilizer into top 3"of soil. 3.The Contractor shall notify"Gopher State One Coll"48 hours prior to any 763-560-5203 ;INSTALL TREE �� ax Ar �q 1 1 0 3. Dormant seed mix shall be used after November t excavation(1-8)11-252-1166.) \\ P'!e c6 or when temperatures do not exceed 4f7 F,using 4.The Grading Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground kit y_ 18'� PROTECTION FENCE j - V .t '"• some rates speefned above. No seed shall be utilities with utility companies prior to any eonsWction,and immediately notify the 1 1C�`y�N � {`AS NECESSARY „ , placed on shoe or ice greater than 2"in depth. Engineer of any conflicts. �•S}y �t V,-:. i� <SO n1�K 5.20 4. My seeded areas that do not become established 5. Erosion Control shall be constructed, as applicable,as sequenced below: t 1 •� SILT FENCE •it `'1 °- ' with vegetation shall be reseeded at Contractor's A Silt Fence. / •� aM FCE� , expense. B. Rack Construction Entrance. 5. Refer to erosion control schedule for seed and C. Demolition mulch achedule with regards to grang. D. Common excavation(grading). �1 , ' 1 Ims.•Ip tA� { f k ;, 6. Refer t d o Landscape Plan for seeding and sodding F Seed and mulch or sod (See notes on Landscape plan). 1II , SILT FENCE locations and details. PROTECTION , 5lxi y 4 6. Final rose shall govern for easements and lot dimensions. 5 1 -- � ;Ia m� , 7.Any erosion control items necessary to protect adjacent properties shall be A contacted by the Grading Contractor. Q w�dH.gr 1 , 9cs•• r"ac , _. l 1 8. Erosion control maintenance shall be performed by the Grading Contractor, and GI a< 1 O O 11 -`g0 .i;" 1 - &0 t t tl removed ce per the Contract Documents or as directed by the Engineer,followed r �fi � by all necessary restoration of disturbed ores. This work shall be Incidental to the rm ere,. 1 A„',•eesi.'}'T flit PROTECf10 T1. ,Cc I 1 trj �`�1Q '.swrx 1 �J ,v�Z rn grading contract • ..,.e(r t F:'�,a�) 1 • J 1 1 111 .+x� -k 9.The Grading Contractor timely fashion.the soily engineer shall facilitate following: of � � '1!'f ,. ',` � t �z �y ' t m all controlled fills in a time fashion. Density tests shall meet the followin �•V1 O r six 4x 2 r- .,-eaa.sz ....sssa- p ,,spd (2}p) j A Within the upper 3' of streets, the Grading Contractor shall utilize approved `� p 1. soils that ore within 1%of the optimum moisture content as defined by the 1 f. tl tYfe 1 kS 1 4 esd? t. 40 Q Standard Proctor Test-ASTM: D-698 with compaction meeting 1005 Developed by: �1 1 1 to H / S u Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding this compaction by more than `QQ �f` `� ° -. ` w 'ab� / < Z , 15. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 955 Standard Proctor Border Foods 1 -I a ` - 1 Density, and be within 35 of the optimum moisture content Grading _ l 965 Decatur Ave North 6-, 1• tolerances shall be 0.1'. ' " SERVICES IN PLkCEI 1 x' C Golden Valley MN 55427 •Ir I 11 `JO"8r L--1 A 1 1 `b ! w•90 I'm B.Grading tolerances for the remainder of the site shall be 0.25'. ` 1 w,}� .m;1 f � ,l!}3 t •.v(• K ` ' a .,1, 1 10.All areas of unsuitable soils found in the pod described above that cannot be �•r' f` 1 `11 1 1.a, { �' �' corrected shall be located in the field by the Grading Contractor. The Grading Contact Barb Schneider ` t 1 ( .1 \ Iz , 1 Q7--' •, 11 Contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of these areas and provide SILT FENCE -1 !" x �•,• L-�" `.1 informotion as to their size and location. Phone: 763489-2970 ,• ,k gSje!11 X32 �°.!: 11. The Grading contractor shall provide positive drainage on the site at all times. 1 9 O i 11 7, :+ cal - 591 00 O !\ 12. The Grading Contractor shall keep public streets and travel ways clear of soil and 1 �� (� ip ;c,� _ r.•,1 "-` 1° = �-� d T y' c- ° `1l.SILT FENCE debris. Daily cleaning et the construction entrance shall be performed,especially at a 7C '14 1. �� P�•{�` _ -- �1� w 't the end of each days work. 05.s• ' 13.All silt fence shall be removed at project completion. ennmmmd ¢O Y 1l.";- assts ` of m G4( t,�t, 14.All proposed elevations ore al Now line unless otherwise noted. sec eaelxuemx rase rRPAam ar: $Q sl 6 x1,11 r°szs y�ll, ''. •1 yD(ry� G`O OE` h a 15.All erosion control best manage practices shall be per City standards. CIVIL ENGINEERING 8 �� z 9r ,t T lT,• ! 1 i "as2ar_ TA �0 50 �, y` �b ' - x - -- !, z 1 1 SITE DESIGN > ,1 1 , x.tc8 ��, �q }55.50 i �5 ; `-° 1 S ti ve e 7.55 .-TSB , sg;0.bs:"•9 S lA SAO 858.0 s. 184 52.1 8�1 Q] ; f es'.0 !�_. r5 ¢p .i Iloraty wary ram mi.pdn,.ped6asfan,w µ JO 5 reP twsrprepnMbrmeaundwnly •`\• �- 1 `;,t ' C Q e:'4�',1'v8 E ar� t>'�1 } "�`.__ •�, i JN-^.t1�A- ,_�E=t�y���'APw``'�`I-"_� s.A.. �'��1 f,'., 40 �1 eBunpoetnleou nea r Meeltl w em o rthe Shi am M1 Mnnam. smrrDa+l�-(a Pmadxen.: a rpll ea tlurentr simwm: SA..�.tAr- 50is ,q lot D�. 03v„2 Iuolt..s• 2494e ,1 '�4'fi( ,dV4 ml , t �'1:i'/ Frill NislwY PLANNING COMM REVIt1N 0927Db.2012 1 1/2"BITUMNOUS WEAR CURSE 2'BITUMINOUS WEM COURSE -Mn00T SPEC 2350 MOOT SPEC x3w _ INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: -- 1 1/2•BTUMINOUS BASE COURSE 2'BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE r.r_',:,?,-:• 8 CONCRETE PAVEMENT W/ MnDOT SPEC 2350 MOOT SPEC 2350 =•�(+:�:'.-+�'- 61(6"-f10/10 W.W.M 6'CUSS V AGGREGATE BASE 8'CLASS V AGGREGATE BASE 4"CLASS V AGGREGATE BASE C1.0 SITE PLAN New Building I SPEC 3138 MOOOT SPEC 3138 MnDOT SPEC 3135. T-50,48 Seats:2,642 SF C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP C3.0 DEMOLITION PLAN GRADING,DRAINAGE, • 1 V TO PASS PROOF ROLL 6'TO PASS PROOF ROLL 6'TO PASS PROOF ROLL AND EROSION NoTTS C4.0 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN CONTROL PLAN LIGHT DUTY HEAVY DUTY 1' 2omoe.11 CONCRETE M oa CONFORM P TO MN T Pml.a SPEC.2461 C5.0 UTILITIES PLAN MIX MD(No.3T32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT C6.O DETAILS °°"" So NOTE SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL SPACE THE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 12'-0'O.C. Dwkwl SO C4.0 3.SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE USTED SPECIFICATIONS LESDProi.asao3al BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER �I NOTES: W L 1. CONFIRM PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE AND WATER MAIN SERVICE LOCATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PLANS. Associates. Inc. 2. REFER TO ELECTRICAL AND LIGHTING PLANS FOR CONDUIT SIZE AND SITE LEGEND: LOCATION FOR MENU BOARD, PORTAL,AND LIGHTS POLES. 1 - E%ISTNG aDRB AND GUTTER ExlsnNa SroRN SEWER Q 4 _ ESISrING SANITARY SEWER SEIMCE .,..,...:-t.- ....., DDVINa WATER MAN SERNCE >6L•L11. 1 -------- n1- sl t - PROPOSED CURB AND CUTTER a831 West 3Sn A,eel !�•'e" �} A.ImPd 1 1 -�� PROPOSED STORM SEWER 51.Lairs 55118 m V \ G55T \ x .--P----�---� PROPOSED WlrNif SEWER SERJICE 0 20 SO 6e F..952.SC1.9551 PROPOSED WATER MAIN SETMCE ( ! 'PJ ^r "`,v8`6 ' P Je.\� {' '.}_`^' o• �_ PROPOSED IRRIGATION CONDUIT GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ND www wcM Cam IV PVC EVOCATION COUIT•�1�- ` I D Ts B)IM Benchmark:i AENOS -` , ' Benchmark:Top nut of hydrant at Q tt j MONµR�(^'') 0�* ; ; southwest quad of Northport& �cw d'+B'2D1� ca a ` , , t,t �S1 Brooklyn Blvd. 1 Elevation=861.97 feet u1C°C a vl , I i fRtm rws�Ne \� a w rwmnc PE.e3sAa pE-65720 ` } t p /�T IEOr)-as4.4t Ox tt Dur) 1't (+2•o EM iTD(24•ovr) , RErt5650 (11 IE(E)-aK.SO(Neu ..V 1 n 1 210(24•M IE(q-esz7a(2a•IN) tt IE(w)-es2.70(24'Out) - `1 A Q t IE-asa.7o soup `IE-050.70 SUMP so'-12'RCP t t ,'E�eea7a svMr Q s•a4os G]�1- -� 2P-24'PD60RDFD a4'-24'PERFORATED T l , g 1'- GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: fw,s� 1 rowl-WUl HOPE PFE n11N OLIN•-WNL NoPE PEE MDII 114 PVC IRRIGTION CONDUIT •-I j R1 1. S ecifications a plicable for this project: Current standard specifications for the A� cxe,nea 10 RE0I0.E AND REPI/CE , rcEOTFxntE SUCK•x.015 OEDTDOILE SOCK•OAX (Ta BE INSTAt1ID AT A 5 L P P P J Taco r DEPTH OF te0 YATa EROS A C'1i City of Brooklyn Center, MN and all Minnesota Deportment of Health and MPCA CONNECT 70 QTSONG GTOi 5151N 'Nocess w FOR STORM ,�--!'! WIIN 14 REaUt M) - requirements except where modified by these contract documents. E G , 2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project. Bell �lWTN NEW 12•RCP BY CORE 9E'1yF7t INSTALLATION `I 1 -. s'ewro CONI'1ECT TO Da5'SIZE SANITARY SERVICE , D 3. The Contractor shall notify"Gopher State One Call"4B hours prior to any REFORM INVERT AS NECESSNfr AND Sale 1 1+- WITH WUWALFNT SITE PPE INSTNI �t - GROUT(DNNELIION PER arc 1 .-'''^I '^ I BIROS AS rIECESSM r AND 3Y Pvc _�. excavation (651-454-0002 or 1-800-252-1166 out state.) STANDARDS. t 1 ___ SON 40 O MIN.1.0.1 OR GRFATEFL 4. The Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with E1�E AnONG ANpD con T ENONEEA ^ 1 t� �, a E�m� � J^ y , utility companies prior t any construction (storm sewer,sanitary sewer,water, 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard IMIFDIAIFLT F OIFFEfif71T. �--vs 1 ,- �` lauTlvL PIPE FOE,wTERUts,A+D t ,j natural gas, telephone,electric, etc.), and Immediately notify the Engineer of any Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 C011NELT 70 EXORTNC INTER ELEVATION of Ez.SEANCE PRDR To ! It conflicts. 763560-5203 enNKE PIPE A4 N 50'D. WORK CONFIRM PROPOSED INJFRT AT ' 1 tt T•.1� 5. The Contractor shall protect oil existing utilities and facilities to allow proper J 1 INSTALL t#7D5 AND SD'0.1.PIPE BULLDNG CAN BE Arl1EVED. t T 7 -.., OOSTNG y,� - EnsnNC InrAnDN Is APPROxn1ATE. -CDNTRACIOR s1KL LT111GLT EXISTING t I , functioning during and after construction.My required supporting structures shall CONRACIUR SNML FIF1D IERIFr 1MIEIYATELY F ELEVAEx7N1 OF EASI7NG t be supplied by the Contractor as work incidental to the contract. ' T %� MANER SE JO B 1 , !1 1polgN.PIPE 512E W717eAL5 _ �975tMCE COIFLJCIS WRN PROPOSED �-- 6. The contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of a conflicts between 1 MANHOLE ro BE I 1 1 AND ETEVAnoN of E�a1NG vNERr. j s fY 9i nY Ugn FOR `!� l !AND EI-pypT TO WORN,CONFTRM \ IMMI l ` existing utilities,and the proposed construction.The Engineer will coordinate with rs (, MONITORING EL PROPOSED INVERT AT IF NO CAN ` . 1 !11 1 the Utility Company in question to determine the need for relocation of the existing TRAFFIC CONTROL 9141 PRWOE O i 'BE ACIlI£D. CONfPACIOR SIlW. i1 utiiit TEMPoRVtY IANE CLOSURE OeEA n 7!`1e CONTACT ENGINEER IMYmNTELY IF L; "' ,7t 7. Existing conditions such as sand in manholes or valve boxes shall be identified by MnOCT YNIIML)pURNC ALL WORK ? �• ELEVATION OF F]OSIING SEinWLE -�->•� + / AT Ewmne UiCN 6ALN tS1 `b t4 CON`UCTS Wlmt PROPOSF.O e1VlTrf .^ 1�\ the Contractor and these shall be reported to the Engineer prior to excavation by _-ter the Contractor. Once construction has begun, all damage to underground utilities lk"I �pT NCO 1 1i will be assumed to have been caused by the Contractor,any repairs necessary ll1 ! 1 .7! \sM1nARY sTTNCE TAG rj0 - 1 shall be performed by the Contractor at the Contractors expense. �_.AT-^', E-5327 58' B. Final Pict shall govern for easements. WATER SOLACE CONFIRM WE FFE $ ' 9' Contractor shall coordinate with the local jurisdiction to obtain permits and }yiiittt 1 T s•lUwyw saf AN0 ntv.LATIN _-,yT�F ;Ay 1 . z a K-esTa MEI2t PTANS --y :t meter for water source. All associated costs shall be Incidents o e tt ,1 1'} u. CONFIRM 512E ,_�.' 0 S•_'..r4 1 9 P Y TY Y T, t 'Ae AND ELEV WON y I Contract, inciudin disposal of test water into City's sanitary sewers stem. The g. 1 MECIL ISAts Contractor shall not operate gate valves or hydrants on the City's water supply 1 QI 1 r +tf 10.Aa Contractor shall notify the City Engineer and the Project Engineer 48 hours 4'we IRtIUT10N CONDUIT w �� 1�I w =-1 q0 , prior to starting work or as required by the local jurisdiction or be subject to 't(70 BE NSTNIID AT A � ��� ,�_ 1 \? being shut down. 0 tomµ R Ojp) �t� !'" 4'Me Bvwjam CQIOUR is ' 11.The Contractor shall keep access roads clear of soil or other debris, and Developed by: ` �yr�6EE�yT,T4 "M is-)is-)MM�it Om 1, pe in 9 daily street cleaning as required by the ion pr permit Positive Border Foods j 514,;•1 _ �� µ�M ! drains e,controlled with erosion control and erasion et pr to measures as 11 required within the NPDES permit shell be performed. Inlet protection shall be 1 �• �t23'p�yno installed within 48 hours after inlet construction. Unless specified on the plans or 965 Decatur Ave North os a bid item on the Bid Form, any temporary culverts, ditches, filter fabric,etc. Golden Valley MN 55427 t necessory to accomplish this shall be performed as incidental to the Contract. 12.The Contractor shall preserve and protect the morkem and monuments set for the subdivision of the land. Contact Barb Schneider 1 Ir✓ 1 13.The Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilttate certification of all Phone: 763-489-2970 controlled tesisn shall be taken on all trenches tat locations ash determined 111 11 1 ELEV.857.30 PAVEMENT/CURB by the Engineer or his representative. B.Within the upper 3' of street, private drives and parking lots.Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1% optimum moisture content as defined by the SID anlulhnt AAra sr CASTING ndard Proctor Test-ASTM: D-698 with 100%Standard Proctor Density and c s mulburt ax RIA�rwP not exceeding compaction by more than 1%. Below the upper 3', compaction shall :856.50 PAVEMENT/CURB meet 95%. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'. CIVIL ENGINEERING ELEV 14.The Owner shall pay for ail testing of soils compaction.Any areas which foil to SITE DESIGN BOTTOM OF COVE meet the above standards shall be corrected and re-tested by the Owner's testing ELE =856.00 APPROX. CASTING agent of the Contractor's expense. V 15.All water main shall be installed with a minimum of 7.5 feet of cover. 16.Contractor shall provide temporary traffic control in compliance with MN/DOT "Temporary Traffic Control Zone Layouts Field Manual"dated 2011 for construction I Ieniby mwfyWdthl,pMn.roe TAV<aA or Ie'RCP aImET BOTTOM OF COVER adjacent to travel ways. nPut mpm n.1 l-. a� ca-L oxLr 17.Contractor shall be responsible for verification of the depth of existing stubs listed Enkleerlp,a:rme lexA a'De 3We a• ELEV:855.20 APPROX. on this plan prior to the ordering of any fittings, structures,castings,etc. MnnexY]. 854.70 En ineer and the Owner shall not be responsible for any discrepancies found as depths are estimated. Pltlbi Nx- BCOTTOAHIJ(E 854.70 elnnahm: Sa.��.lAl'- D.4: 0=112 U_k 24345 zr PERE1n1ATEn ` z4•KR TED 24•PERFOIUTED NDPE PO'E ` HDRE PIPE MPE PIPE WITH BATE%TILE SIXX VITH GEOTEXTILE SOCK WITH GEOTEKTRE SOCK RYV NiMey OM SLOPE TRENCH PLANNING COMM REVIEW 032 SIDES PER ' OSHA REQUIREMENTS - 852.70 852.70 - SELECT IN FILL " �I ,z MI INITIAL D D BACKFlLL 2i•sulr INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: 21•SUMP TSELECT 15RA AR 171 D HAUNCHING SELECT GRANIRAR ALL SUM MATERIAL LL SUMP C1.0 SITE PLAN New Building t ' BEDDING STRUCTURES TO 36•eELw ova r0 Sims STRUCTURES TO jp AIEI BIE Y HAVE 2 - 3' WEEP Dr PIPE HO ES IN BASE SLAB C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN T-50,46 Setts:2,642 SF HOLES IN BASE SLAB UTILITIES PLAN 1. BEDDING SHALL BE SELECT GRANULAR 850.70 850.7D C3.0 DEMOUTION PLAN BORROW MNDOT SPEC.3149.28. • 2 COMPACT TO 95%STANDARD PROCTOR. C4.0 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 3. SELECT FILL PLACEMENT SHALL BE FREE OF LARGE ROCKS(3"4)AND SHALL BE PLACED C5.0 UTILITIES PLAN IN 8"MAX LOOSE LIFTS AND COMPACTED TO 849.70 0- 05!!0511 So 95%STANDARD PROCTOR. 0 DETAILS 1°v' STRUCTURE 6. RE AND INFILTRATION ZONE STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE al.d.e so C5.0 BEDDING DETAIL SECTION VIEW SECTION VIEW C7.0 DETAILS ceSD Pmod R Dealt CB-1 CB-2 AND CB-3 TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Associates. Inc. • ." . �� roa.onw.,°we ------ - a alp .. NN:� _ rnA ukc 6MiiPT ATNr oe�TL� n a:v...>-" �j "'AM�u wst rxv avn sres IV— ICI s� SWe DOD .4.Tr, eC em• c M aLwYPPk,Minne .y)., Benno tifd =mC p why ge�mna� 55116 T.A52 50-8969 sdl-SM . �"ERB10< YMII .ATwaE� c9: -e7 - wwm Nb cwm . nammvA wkuBxe.. TS e o..vr w+• ° lu°° .a ux N4 mIN vwA y b m rot Kr# !0n - E1"w,N° HTia us.Hsu S T/aC0 To}wKAOVna" ° t UTA w i. n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . m = k n. H Taco . .� ..' aBD(RdG ANO JDINT,RESTRN,NF FOR MATER MNN AW.0]/NN 3N�OOItYN 6.M4mr SENNCE CERMTOT 10 RISER ¢k 'aoAwyn�wT -K's..l f dt) g nR11c 51.,..L fiat-j 6 3B x'�w .S t ...h wu6 w R ' Se—CAL L D f R -t-j AY s,l�rz tATON BASIN TRANSITION.G I N!T+A L 6-12/11-03 OIRIQ I Pbu ' B C i I.. 3o4 103 M2ifi On . .6404 . 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 . . . . ' 763-560-5203 `. MY . 1/28 a. 3-RAO.. . . . . . . . . ' . /2 BAD POPE 3/4 JpA®A 2 A. 1 °rwu rww.n R.r �_ ��JIi 0 eSTEELPCBT FB1E0 rta R °Bu aN AMP • UP ®'Oa. T.a B-ry t2' 1 VA M0.?V FETE 0CNCFCAFl� CON TEE%P LJDINT Herr aQe a olrmt CCTdCRETECURB . u m Q�Q SERFAGE OF DRIVE TH L_AN. • vns �nw..rm .•,,.: _ W rr I/YRA0. ry S I FINISH GRADE H 2 J vrr 6 YRAID. eT r . _ u °'• BoF Yu1w"" A.r . OPE 3{TER'Fr' 2 - - • • IVOCOWCFETE SLDI'E 1/B'PER FF. LR Developed by: _ / _ CRETE. . Border Foods I� m .6612 I FornBq I rm I L J— I 1 (OUTFLOx� a 7 WALK °"'h; • 4. I'SAND BASE 965 Decatur Ave North - ..» °- ''r-� -�- `--�:••�-{ Golden Valley MN 55427 . _ GON. dt 91W1&OUIROw SIRE DIRB IN AREAS 1NAT - - v I I ;,.,l,i,I-•ft I 1'I .o m Oln . . . . . . . . �.. �- - V.VF. . . . . . sox AwnxAORxE nrta � I I -Ii'H� =1-ICI- Con[act Barb Schneider Bb12 OUTFLOW QIRH L GUTTER J_..'.. - .. -. Phone: 763 489-2970 . .. a . Six.. - NOTESe . _ w u'ir'aw T of uu:. I CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE T MA aMUN.AND STABBED FRONT ANSI BACK. 2)AT ALL TRENCHES 224 REINFORCING RODS SHALL BE PLACED IN THE LDWER SIDEWALK.DETAIL _ cowbm nom^ ...w.o PORTION OF THE CURB 20 FEET IN LENGTH. (Srmmw DETAIL FROM TACO BEW mrsw�TNx nAns P er.. -ED?ITTRII.114 •RANP 7056F _ _ PEDtSTRIAN•CURB RAN-CPTEONS p- T036F -3)2-/4 REIN RIDING RODS AT CATCH BASINS NO LESS THEN-10 FEET IN LENGTH: GUARD.POST.BOLLARD RETAIL . . . . . . . . ... CIVIL ENGINEERING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DETAILS' (nom OE A0. FROM DLO MW SITE DESIGN' ——m — M n"..,.. CONCRETE CROWN Ilele6y lNmh6e040Yn.NNg6°bn:° STANDARD STEEL �DDNw660rtpvW 61'OIB aMIMErm.d 1/4•NUT'L BOLT OM... Wtlrtl9m 66uh LkMTW ASSE . . ... . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . me EA(ATeef Dlnl YAw alHle SR9bIN HBLY NnneeMA ... P1Yb6 Nun: 5[07T06HU0: �6 CONSTRUCT 2'NIGH BERM WIN Y•2-WOOD POSTS LTER FABPoC vEHt�IE N WU(PIUN SIDE.SLOPE OF 4:1. 4.0'AC.. ((ulRnAn-FNMRO FE10E. B'IOIRIuN: . O OR PPROVE)FOUAL) - M D 30--MA L 38' ABDE LRAOEano 6'DIA %'B STEEL DBY' 03�n2 Lww F. 2138 PIPE BOLLARD CONCRETE FILLED. OA`n0IG . - DIRENPON O: OYw nATL .. PAINTED YELLOW 'PLANNIN O20 DRAINAGE PLANNING COMM REVIEW '0327.2012' 6ACKflLL 6-.fi-�ENCh' Y TO 3-GRAVEL TED T aRR CR m E�PEO. OLR6(R SIGNAGE ACCEtSABLE AIM. . psp UNDISNRBED 500. LOCAL,L STATE STANDARDS INDEX OF.CIVIL SITE D:RAWINOS: •_ NOTE THE ROCK ENTRANCE$SHALL BE INSTALLED ' PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY SITE WORK 1• 1 THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSPECTED _fi - ITT FOLLOIMNG EACH RAINFALL MAINTCENANCE / ¢xriB W-T[w l r. - i� C1.0 SITE PLAN - OF THE ROCK ENTRANCES SHALL INCLUDE A . TOP DRESSING OF NEW GRAVEL OR REMOVAL SILT'FENCE'NOTES: '' � -- - - i � New Building MID REPLACEMENT OF T[GRAVEL AS NEEDED, Tu 62.0 EXISTING CONDITION$ PLAN TO KEEP THE ENTRANCE FREE FROM COLLECTED 1.DIG A 6'X6-TRENCH ALONO THE°TENDED FENCE UNE ATfOR V SIB' T-50,48 Seats:2,642 SF MUD. 7-DRI ALL POSTS'INTO THE OT°1NO AT IN DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE TRENCH: 60WRETE 0'AS APROVED C3:0 DEMOLITION PLAN 3,LAY OUT SILT FENCE ON.THE UP1ML SIDE ALONG THE FENCE UI AND BAD(DLL 1 . . . . . DETAILS . - - - BY OWNER . ♦,l.00D POSTS MAY BE SPACED UP TO{FEET APART TO SUPPORT THE FABRIC. - B'' • - 1 REMOVE SILT FENCE AFTER TURF IS CSTABUSHED. � 'NOTES: � � � - Lr 'I- � . ' ' CO.O' GRADING; DRAINAGE AND EROSION-CONTROL PLAN - - ROCK CONSTRUCTION PROTECTIONNS OPTION E NTMCO.INLET INSERT OR EOUAL ui tr rJl ENTRANCE DETAIL e.DIA C5.0 UTILITIES PLAN SILT FENCE DETAIL . enn FOOTING 66.0 DETAILS P 2D».06.i1 , . DI SD INLET PROTECTION DETAIL BOLLARD SIGN POST DETAIL c,.a,a Bo C6.0 . TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER . . . . . ... . . . . WCL Associates. Inc. ENTRY • PORTAL PAOTM E002845P ... 8347 -........ _ .931West MMS- 11-1017116' ._..._ 84.46' _.. SIGN SPECIFICATIONS 5467 LOdPak�M�nn.wM �—7.6114•- P-411MV 55416 Materials -' - ~� ^ 'Ist..541-9569 X 1'3 NIF' F-7 Pol;=akorab':nv,dh w°cn�drn a5nn 2nd Meaa. F.95]..541-9554 &n—9—d bel rPGE t!nR PVC pipe vt- FO ONa®nF]M ae'[W i�—iMSi SJFictF PVC pipe v.+C'n^y19rzpNCV apace tsl ziWam. -12J 10.v AETMIatIDE�' .MGYLH3 /nTTD DGHI(UnlMES PO.MJR:Y.WNf FIT: ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS j t Y,1TR'.G,E.:9 -tosL:sA¢ 117.89- %Ca:MU+ lLA 114.02- 717.5' .uuauwM € --• COLOR SPECIFICATIONS 720• rOR:.kD gQ IR�k [� ZZ IIS> Sean!sLha:Amber Vh,e SVW57 ,{ bEA Gm14.is'Sse"secnd surhw 96'54- 102.461 e{ -.Light Bn9:PMS 131U 1 �� Ct I 7aFTa� R Dart 8e0:PMS 13911 �y IM3e A—bl)• QTB 811m TGq D04ae 4966230 0 3 Hetal8el Panlb ti.Ir PMS28951 Odhow Bar Paia to math RAS 109 — - Taco A A § See Detail C -_E: - 1 SCALE:3/8 1 p .L -I i 1 SIGN SPECIFICATIONS Bell rP�E4UUa sB4aU -,2=' '1�•L- Habeials MO:r,A4 :l'tT:. .Slod .Mbs sh-d F`3 ! •Aluwinum BeO 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard .t; FOUrroAT1oN IrEOUmm. 04coraeua --" ENGINH2WE Sw WIC •semna slmace dewranon Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 1'X24' AT.$QUaro @16.S S9.n(rovmr Only). ANCHOR 1 AANNDINANNARIMPUBE �r 763-560-5203 BDLTS �.•C• �Z tOANEApDt/ asrllgarwi rJ`,`�. _1 YRad lead �1:��-'_i'I �rt •Designed undnl lBC 2006 w"iw gl.FL 0-15 0mph ;��• Wdloadattap—ecalld50 m/59FL dead trnau f"—T� .wEawe fl` _' S'it• I,•Ft! snmY mad. a "Yq mwe N u+.x va ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS FTr4 Flood lights r;,•a�cm„N I �p1zoAmp awL La lMUU6sNEC wmWgla O a D�rca c I 4, COLOR SPECIFICATIONS aad1YM• F1'd OUL A Yebw PUS108 rAIVE-Eame I�4'E"�I °.Iagar4Fwa�: 1>a6 4N paa6 IN •D R-AwDdcNa ]J9- _ ve SR 6657 onn" a-" 1�gr.w Dryme 49-WUQC73 tlm y 'L`1ti'-`r�L� Vim.�a1OAmn`g1a;°"ate z o`I Imo' ... 59549.01 alscAa,a:�._w.a��.,,,ebwe.. m.a�,a,�sw�.w..o,m.a.r✓+.�..,7n:,•1 Q� O� JG n�OFWYM�aaU4© alwuR[a n'we0r. dal¢ "— "— aazav EvGNa'�e qAt„OT 51.G.ov�saC.Ylucone�i•SA.IMre'.4,4.5'N]20.FOe aDN07]M.xww.wndu.¢m n1�/,d - TACO BELL '"�tMw"" • MNrA:E0O21731• 0 91.362'..---- 11.699' 72.0'..._..._._- —7.375' NOTE:VERIFY BO LT PATTERN PRIOR TO o r( � cDNSmucnoN Developed by: CONNECTION OF MENU BOMO.PIER 18raea' ll ll Border Foods 2. NOTE.VEflIFY AND CONFIRMATION BOARD TO PIER ql� BY OTHERS F , , PATTERN PRIOR T F 1I�I i PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. OWECTIONAL SIGN Q 9 • ORDERCONFWARD 965 Decatur Ave North o °ANOPY MENJB.ARD Golden Valley MN 55427 NI CAN—AND 1..a. CONDUITSCHEDULE PORTAL AND NPORTAL RSPIER w 00 70.131' BTTTHEfl$ OO•C f-Fo DEVICE PCwER RI a� Ihaeby=Miry dW-PM.wad Prepared by mew icenz d B, CONDUIT.GEE SCHEDULE r my abed swe—,,and Ina-l am a dwy uIr ammmd ewer me Mrn d me sate N vpRi DIRECTIONAL SIGN FOR REQUIREMENTS OBE: n� uncle 1 ZO 1.OANCH� PORTAL ORDER CONE BOARD NOTE: O BOLTS MIN. MENU BOARD ANCHOR BOLTS:(4)}DIA.O ALL CONDUIT TO BE MIN.IT 3 EMBEDOMENT 24' MENUBOAFtDjOnDERCONF. BELOW GRADE OT LOCAL �e BOARD FULL THREAD ame READ FROST DEPTH AND PROJECT D.-CYM TABOVE FOUNDATON 14.68] T.O.FOOTING TO BE g. Repizhatron: e 1-SELOWGRADE GRADE vroNd COnm<I' Dean Madwn c 15.650' , GRADE Phone Number: 957.511.9969 -�j P4N Mislay �1e F10MNEW i[KNLW � 'I. g PLANNING COMMREVIEW 03.23.2012 m L- 33.0'-"-'I 9—e IW.— SGIL IrP— ar m (2)#3 TIES 0 T O.C. $ Slq SEFLF7GIIDIf e-� u wl �rY "O RIGID C, OUT TO .tYRM„q v.yn W. GUPPLY Oq (6)<5 BARG VERT.W/#311Es asicc.faalR�aa,W II ffOR CANOPY ONLY) E10'O.C. o e o,w a ywsaaa"FaM1� g� )a.a I' (B)lS VERTICAL.EQUAL yyII SPACING. O ml w+v m.mM- ~liY� eo u� �- 9 wvvw 1®S.fatrtl•Ndvq•4aC -1d / ES rTBtaATION pEfAll I F •• WECTONAL GON BORS ELICTWLLdF6RGTI06f 1OUNDAIoN(0EP ' RDENCONF.80MDBM5 <d SCALE N9 FOUNDATION(0 OM L.T 7CLE4R .. L9r CU.YD.CONCRETE) MENU/PREWEW BOARD BARS New Building oImna r gnlanaTaw,n 4r4,aaL LD T-50,46 Seats:2,642 SF <3 TES 010'OC.ADD(27 TIEG 0 Z'OC AT TOP ER CONF.BOAR.FOUNDATION DRIVE THRU OUTSHEETS AND � CDA SNLFIGTIU? W BOMDFOUNOATON FOUNDATIONS - 6' 75'dtick D•si We,acaYa • S.,c 1'=1'O' Wed OYr;sgoaec n 6, nlwOryc4ai°9aalo aMgAn4en:lr.iwlg�bprepnasy�e,vw.t4Y.enesena•aaaae•e4a4AarnagwurOa.®a 2� I`— 7011.0611 !m.Ma.��aP �!i!�arfa-T_Y'i�W rf..__.__.___-.___ . EV eauvsiioma..GN.nllaq.w.m:nsma.R,w.:aleazwi�.FSm.4»7.w..,.n.•+.+.e.�-ennAi o-a.n DsM CANOPY AND ENTRY PORTAL FOUNDATIONS 1/2•=r-D A DIRECTIONAL,ORDER CONFIRMATIONS AND MENU BOARD FOUNDATIONS IT,--1113 ==sea a DT1 qO TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER s WCL Associates. Inc. • 19J1 VJesl OSN 51reN Suite 200 9.Louts Park Minnesota 55118 F.952.511-9550 Yxw.xth.com L L 5D L bn b, b, L L L L b, L br bz br br bz br Lx ba b: bs bz L Lz br br U 12 L L L L L V. SD b. L 16 L L b, L L L L 12 12 ba L L 1a ba La 1-7 b ba 1a 1. 13 La La L. La ba ba bz bz L L L 5D bD bo b. L L L bz 5z bz Lz b2 1. 1. L. Ls U b. U bs bs bs bs 1' bs ba M bs 4 ba b' b1 b b' Lz L L L L 'aGp L6 L L L bz ba 1. b. b. L. 1+ bs be U L Iz U 1z 1. b+ b' 1' L U U tz 1. U ba 17 1, L L1 b' ba b2 L L L L TACO B E L L �V La tr b. b L U U iz Ls 17 !D L L }� L . ;7 1. U L 1' L L 1. bz 5532 BROOKLYN BLVD, Taco L L L L2 L Ls 1. Iz U Lz L 5D S. L 1, 5a L La L 5a L U Lz 5a U L+ 1. b. 1, L L L L bz b. e U , !111 17 z 16 ro. Su w 1w♦Lz Iu §a L. a L7 W §" sD Lo 14 ba Le ba bz BR❑DKLYN CENTER, MN Bell 1D L L L bz 1.4 14 u I., 5a L. 1. §., 1a ,, §, 1D., 1., lu 1- Ina 1. L It bb L. b2 12 PREPARED BY: JOHN B U J A K E 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 L L L L L 5.s + 1s L1 f ro. \7q>< 1.1<S>1. Iv L. 5 L, fu 17., 11 14 19. Us bs f L Ls L. Lz Lz A CC US E R V LIGHTING & EQUIPMENT 763-560-5203 • L L 52 bz BA , 5. L W h+ Uz Is. ]u 5. 1' tae 1. La fu b 1. b. bz bz 877-707-7378 • L L b2 L' bs + �,3 • ro L, L 1. 1. 1. ,a• .+ + t' 1. b' 12 12 502-961-0357 FAX L L 'w b2 5. 1s 1a LI S, 5. 5a sz tJ L Sa L. 7 In Ls iv iz7 1 1 17 U 4 b4 bz bz i X4 U U bb b. jbujake2accu-serv,com L L bE bE L. L7 h7 4.7 4.. L 5.7 . 1' bP bz L L bz b. Ls b. Iu T2. +7 5.f 5, ®L L L 5, 'm 1„1 L U b, 5. 5. bz 5z MARCH 15, 2012 L L L br La Ls b. . 5. 5. 17 L' k 14.1. iu 1.7 h, , 1'z lu br LD � Is 1.9 Ls L bz b, b, 1 1 h, . L. L. k h+ 107 to lu U- I.. bns 1u Ina L U U 1' La L $4 L • L Lz Lz , Ds 19 t°. ®L 5. 5. ta, iu 1. L. h7 U. 1.. 1. 5. 1z 1a Le L' az L Statistical Area Summary Gp\ br bz ha 11 1. L' 1.. h7 izs hz 1.z 1n1 >I L 12 1+ L Lz B. Pro ect, All Projects Label Avq Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min bz 13 L 51 5. U 5, § fu iu Tu Iss Iv Iv 1>, I iz 17 bs ba bz bz PARKING LOT SURFACE 10.41 21.2 4.1 2.54 5.17 7 DRIVE-THRU LANE SURFACE 9.37 17.2 3.6 2.60 4.7B br 1' bs bb be L ez 5a a IDZ 1ua + 1. 1u ba a L 5z L L7 1. b� bz bz LIGHT LEVELS ARE MAINTAINED FOOT-CANDLES, INITIAL LEVELS ARE SLIGHTLY HIGHER o L La bs L, 1. is .z L ..7 lw Iss is6 5s U 5.7 w L b6 1. La bz bz $ L bz bs be 1. 5s ..e e. S 5.7 5A 13 L7 E5 13 52 L OD C Developed by: L L 5. tib L 1e Sw ' '" ' 1 fe 5e B. 53 bz L LuninaVe Schedule Border Foods E oop Project, All Projects L L L La b7 U7 k. 5z 5 11 I. 1' b3 L L oao Symbol Oty Label Arran event Lurens LLF Descrl tion le L L 12 U L, ki!t6o 6 1.D I 1+ U b. L, bz 5, {) 11 T3 SINGLE 9500 0.800 ACCU WSCTTB01-008/LIDOI/06211-015 @ 7.5' A.F.G. a 3 S SINGLE 8500 0.700 ACCU KB3921BK-FULLCUT @ 11.71' A.F.G. o i6 965 Decatur Ave North LD L L L 1' U a S. z § o c 17 L tis L L b, El I OCB SINGLE 12500 0.700 TACO BELL - ORDER POINT CANOPY Golden Valley MN 55427 H 1 A i SINGLE 110000 0.720 ACCU 95200-210-FG / 95200-4255 C, B. b L bz b. bD .+ L 1. bz §a b. b. 5$ a , U L6 L L 5, 0 6 H SINGLE 110000 0.720 ACCU 95200-FPIO-FG / 95200-HSS / 95200-4255 I Irerety ceeEy Nal Nis DUn was Drepa,eD Ey me La L b u L2 1. L Lz 5a U L' L L. bz er mra6etl swerviwnaa N.ti ama d.ry " ` `° ' ' z LIGHTING RESTRICTIONS, FIXTURES MUST BE FULL CUTOFF in r<nsaaamnneaunee.NaawsaNau,a,a C, bo L L L Dz 5. L. 17 L L7 17 i+ 1. La L + bs L L, 3a S7 La i6 3, Is L ba m L. Lz SITE FIXTURES ARE FULL CUTOFF IOOOW METAL HALIDE w/ FLAT LENSES °s ' .. ss FIXTURE B HAS A HOUSE SIDE SHIELD POLES ARE 25'-0' FOR AN OVERALL FIXTURE MOUNTING HEIGHT OF 27'-6' A.F.G. sDnaNre: f ba LD L L L bz 1. b. ob n+ L L U U L U n+ 1+ Ta is U U U u 1+ na ba n7 17 L' n. bz bz Name oa.e ciaa v b. ba v L u b, bz L 14 bs L. b, 5a iz 14 1.7 bn Ls Ls La b. L 1 b. 7 b. be oa La L' . b. br 52 bz L b, 14.8B3 P,Djetl LonYtl: ��M'�Oe bn ba bn L L L L 12 b2 b' LJ Ls b' U U U Is L. 1. TO b. b. 11 11 L. 14 L. b1 b b2 I. L L L L L L Pn+n.NDmen: 511.'x' Is Po,6 HItlory Date $ LD L U b. L b, b, L L L Lz 1' L. La L, ba bs b. b2 L2 12 Lz L 12 bz E2 L2 Lz b2 br b, L L L U bo bD PLANNING COMM REVIEW 03.23.2012 H b. b. b. LD U b, b, L L L L L L L1 L, 1s L Lz bz L L L L L L L L L L to 5, L L bD bn ba bD Py � - (9 New Building 0 T-50,48 Seats:2,642 SF PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E • a Pmjetl 30t1.O8.t1 Omm a8M 0 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN A mi TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER WCL Associates.Inc. - 0 • A A D A4.0 F H C A5.0 P5.0 A5.1 A5.1 F P5.0 4931 Wes1150150M Suie 200 3 LnuM Park Minnesota BS'-1}n2'STUD TO STUD 55416 53'-7Y' 1d'-10' 17- T.95L.54 Sass 9' 2'S T-6' T-6' +'-9Y' F_952.511.955e Yd. 6'.0• 1d.-g. 3'-10' 2d'-4Y' 2'-6• __-__R0 A- R.0 9' R.0 www.wW mm R.O R.O. 10-SY,' 3'-B' 10-1�' I 9'-3. I FIN.DIM. FIN*DIM. FIN.DIM. CLEAR @ EIFS 15 A 25.3 3 M.4 19 16 M.1 r_ ______ 3 7 O 19--_- 1 ° O O a O E SIM. AA 5.0 S _ I g-g 7 _ 194Y' 2 O AG m SC 2 15-z6' I m 0 n �4 3111Ni z-6 MOP 1 6 A6.O 9 _ ]] UTILRY SINK Io ---- WOMEN 2 2R I Taco ---1 g 7 O 2-0' o I I I Qd s'�o• z-3• s".T 6•-1r i'�' A O I I I WARE ___ 4 B V I I I I I 7 AB2 5 WASHING �� ___ - Be I = I I I �d ' o e N A I I I __ __ , MEN I• I Ili Ae.o °'62 N 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard N 2s.3 I I Y 1 I s _ D Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 3 L___ I I^ I I o 2 tr-nY• \ N 763-560-5203 m I AdB.1 A63 m / 2`/ ® 10 OFFICE I __ _2 I I SERVING 1i�--I i 11I� DIAN94 CO IN.o G 3 O - \ 11 w O 10 1 U AC 4. 1 PREP NOTE:PROVIDE IN FLOOR 10 11 I n o w 10 P8.2 12 III 15 Y5.2 GREASE INTERCEPTOR \��������� III 2 IS 6 NSF) AB.2 III 7 1 N I� II t0 B I 1 U _ .__________'O_ 1 Afi.4 A8.1 _' 10 I 16 - 10 NOTE PROVIDE SIGNAGE J I b II A8.2 TB COOK I DRY DUAL PRODUCTION LINE 10 IDENTIFYING FACILITY IS H C a1A� NONSMOKING ASA SIM 5 I I 15 4r-y, 1 '-'"--"--""----------------------------------'r.0 'o, r.(\p� I COOLER I C--- ---11 1'4i' HOOD fid' 1'fi' 9'-10' DRWE-THRU I I I c�4`O.`��V` __ ___ �f I I I I RN.pM 11 m I I I a I SIM. a a II I I ______________- 10 C Q` • I 1 1 K I� ii FREEZER I� AB2 3 A82 4 - A52 ® II II II KRCHEN I I 9 o II I, 11 b I I �I 1 II I- L____________JJ ---------_---- _____ e 3 3 ____________ ____________ 9 FIN.DIM. FlN.pM FIN.DIM. _ CLEAR@ IFS B' 1.-9y. Developed by: z-6' -S•'1C - Y-6' -1y' o 9' T-6 16 15 RG R RO' Border Foods M2 A62 4• 14'-6' 4• 25.-8' �I all STUD TO STLD �I Q n A L Aso ol v Golden Valley MN 55427 ^50 52 �Ai NOTE:SEE FULLERTON A OBUILDING SYSTEMS FOR ee6 ee Ny 0aH66 panty apreparetlb me pr 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. p«MmY Ovea superv¢bn and tAa[I am a Euly eg amnilea anger me Mws ame smote a U �-/}-/� 3 12 11 10 9 g ] 6 5 d 3 2 1 6i9nature: z FLOOR PLAN +/d'=+'° A Name. omeaak E 4.dJJ 3 DIMENSIONS: 1O STARTING POINT.ALL SUB-TRADES SHALL USE THIS POINT AS BEGINNING 15 LIGHTING CONTROL.PANEL Repisaatipn: TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL: INTERIOR SOUND-RATED WALL: A ALLOIMENSIONSARETOFACEOFSTUOU.O.N.REFER TO FOUNDATION PLAN FOR FACE LAY-OlR(INSIDE FACE OF IXT.WALL STUDS). ProjM COnlaa: cean Matlwn 3 2Y5 WD STUDS AT I6'O.C.W/SHEATHING AS SCHEDULED ISEE TYPICAL INTERIOR WALL W/3-1/2'UNFACED OF CON DIMENSIONS. 16 PROVIDE HORIZONTAL DOOR SWEEPS AT ALL EXTERIOR DOORS.SEE SHEET At.t. 9525at9969 Q STflUCT.DWGSJ AND R-19 KRAFT-FACED FIBERGLASS GATT FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION. 6. DIMENSIONS NOTED AS•CLEAR'OR'HOLD'ME MIN.REDD.NET CLEARANCE FROM FACE O6-STUD INTERIOR WALL,FINISHED PER WALL LEGEND E/THIS SHEET. Pnone Number: OF WALL FINISH.VERIFY FINAL EQUIPMENT SIZES W/VENDOR PRIOR TO INT.WALL O FRP TO 4W APF.PALM ABOVE WHITE SATIN FINISH.PROVIDE 2X10 CONT WOOD INSULATION U.O.N.GC SHALL PROVIDE 2 LAYERS OF GRADE D60 FRAMING 17 na NNwy ce0 °_1 O3 PIPE BOLLARD.OFFER TO SITE DINGS.COORDINATE WITH LOCATION OF GAS METER BUMPER.VERIFY HEIGHT PLANNING COMA REVIEW 03.23.2°12 lb BUILDING PAPER I HOODNALL: WINDOWS/DOORS: s TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL WITH 20 GA S.S.PANEL A SEE SHT.A1.1 FOR WINDOW TYPES AND DOOR SCHEDULE. Od HOOD WALL,SEE WALL LEGEND. 18 6'DIA PVC STUB THROUGH CEILING,SEE DETAIL 19/%6.4. ~I TYPICAL INTERIOR WALL: BEHIND HOOD.REFER TO DETAIL 2/M3.0 FOR EXTENT B. ALL DOOR MD WINDOW OPENING DIMENSIONS METO ROUGH OPENING. 2X4WOSTUDSATlWD.C.(2a60R2ae WHERENOTED.) OF S.S.PANEL OELECTRICAL MAIN SWITCH BOARD.REFER TO ELECT.DWGS. OPROVIDEk BENT STEEL PLATE JAMB AT EACH SIDE OF DOOR.PAINT TO MATCH _ FINISH SUBSTRATES: 19 ADJACENT SURFACES. v A PROVIDE 1?THICK MOISTUR RESISTANT GYP.BD.FROM FLOOR SLAB TO 17 A.F.F.MIN.IN - `oI ---------------------- OCpnDONNE INDICATES INTERIOR SUBSTRATE AEU JOINTS GYP SO..U.O.N. ©CO2 FILL BOX LOCATION. 20 STAINLESS STEEL PAN.OWNER PROVIDED.GC TO INSTALL m 8. ALL JOINTS,GAPS OR OSPACES LEADING TO ALL HOLLOW OR INACCESSIBLE SPACES SHALL 3 G ALL SEALED CK OF MOUSE AND OFFICE WALLS SHALL HAVE HAVE�COX PLYWOOD SUBSTRATE, O METAL THRESHOLD WITH TILE EDGE ON INTERIOR SIDE 21 PROVIDE HOSE BIB IN TRASH ROOM.FREEZE PROOF. _ WALL SUBSTRATES: U.O.N. O INSULATE TRASH ROOM WALLS AND CEILING. 7 -DINING ROOM: D. PROVIDE SOUD BLOCKING FOR WALL SUPPORTED ITEMS. KNEE WALL TO SUPPORT SERVICE COUNTER AT 31-3/4•AFF.PROVIDE I2'AFF 0 11Y CEMENT WALLBOARD FROM T.O.SLAB TO 17 AF.F.MIN,WITH 1/2'GYPSUM WALLBOARD FROM T.O.CEMENT BOARD TO 6'ABOVE CEIUNG HEIGHT U.O.N.SEE 6, DECOR: O SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT. 22 CEMENT BOARD ALL SIDES.PROVIDE}PLYWOOD AND BASE ALL SIDES.PROMDE 8816/A6.5.(NOTE:THE CEMENT BOARD SPEC IFIGTION IS DESIGNED TO ALLOW THE G.C.FLIXIBUTY.) A SEEA2.OFORSEATINGPLMANDDETAILS. FRP ON KITCHEN SIDE SUPPLYANO INSTALLED BYGoDECORETO PROVIDE AND New Building -KITCHEN WALLS AND DININGROOMCLOSET: B. SEEA].O FOR FLOOR FINISHES. I1Z CEMENTWALLBOARD FROM T.O.SLAB 1.IYAF.F.WITH 11Y CDX PLYWOODW/FRP SURFACE FINISH TO 6-ABOVE CEILING HEIGHT U.O.N.IF DOUBLESIDED G SEE AS.O-AB.FLORWALL FINISHES. 10 S.S.CORNER GUARD/WALL CAP,TYP.ALL CORNEAS IN BACK-OF-HOUSE FROM INSTALL FRONT AND SIDE WALL FINISHES AND SERVICE COUNTER.NOTE.NO T-50,48 Seats:2,642 SF SHEAR WALL PLYWD IS SPECIFIED THE PLYWOOD SHALL SHALL BE CONTINUOUS FROM SILL PLATE TO TOP PLATE SEE4,11A20/A6.5 D. SEE A7.I FOR CEILING FINISHES. REAR WALL TO THE KITCHEN SIDE OF THE SERMCE COUNTEfl.SEE DETAIL I9/A6.5. EXPOSED WOOD TO BE ALLOWED. -RESTROOM WALLS: FLOOR PLAN 5/6'CEMENT WALLBOARD FROM T.O.SLAB TO TOP OF TILE WITH 51•HI-IMPACT BRAND XP WALLBOARD,TYPE X CORE FROM T.O.CEMENT BOARD TO 6•ABOVE GENERAL: 11 ELECT.PANELS IN 6'(NOMJ STUD WALL.REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. CEIUNG HEIGHT U.O.N..NO SUBSTITUTIONS ALLOWED.FINISH AS SCHEDULED.SEE 11(SIM).12/A6.5 A PROVIDE THREE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS(2)10b.BC anO(1)t01b.ABC-TO COMPLY WITH -ALL OTHER FRAME WALL CONDITIONS: LOCAL FIRE CODE.LOCATE PER DIRECTION OF FIRE MARSHALL OR LOCAL AUTHORIZING 12 W DIA PVC CHASE IN WALL SEE DETAIL 19/A6.4. 1/2•CEMENT WALLBOARD FROM T.O.SLAB TO 1T AF.F.,WITH 12'GYPSUM WALLBOARD FROM T.O.CEMENT BOARD TO 6'ABOVE CEILING HEIGHT U.O.N.FINISH AS AGENT. °. SCHEDULED. B. DRAWINGS ME BASED UPON WOOD FRAMING.UTILIZATION OF METALSTUDS ON O g.�.HORIZONTAL OPENING FOR SYRUP TUBES.COORDINATE WALL PENETRATION • NON-BEM No INTERIOR PARTITIONS,BULKHEADS AND SOFFITS IS ACCEPTABLE. 13 G ALL ATTACHMENTS MADE THROUGH E.I.F.S.SHALL BE BUSHED TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO Prolea 201i.O6.t 1 THE FINISH,PER 17/%6.3. 1 A SPLASH GUARD.SEE DETAIL 9/A6.5.INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH D. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH E.I.F.S.SHALL BE SEALED USING MFRS.APPROVED OHAND SINK INSTALLATION.PROVIDE BLOCKING @WALLS. Drawn OSM Qi�, .0 METHOD. Oiecketl OC A WALL LEGEND E FLOOR PLAN NOTES D KEY NOTES B TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER a WCL Associates. Inc. 9931 Went 35m 6irtet Lours PafK 6P.k 51 Minnesota S a18 A r————1 c-gsz Sgt-99x9 I I szsdt-9ss4 FIRE SPRINKLER. 2 T—————————— I I www.w�amm VERIFY LOCATION ^ I I A� --- i I r----7 54 I IN FLOOR zts 6550 -0]t GREASE 25 // I I\\ II I I L____J I pp r- —.1 5.580 266 599 PRERCEPTOFi S-600 (NSF) P.315 \ // II I __— �// z fi01 K-603 -604 01 I F-,W I I IL-014 l�// LLi5 1 I s TS s Taco L____J O < 11 )0 — 6 Bell L—— IRRIGATION P 550 6 _ ——�IJ \ t t t 1 -'\ G -009 CONTROLS. IIV, i -d81 )o • • 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard ABOVE - - 1\\ / I (\ • G _ Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 ——_—— 763.560.5203 rh NOTE:BOTTOMOFWALL 1` F-030 -150 �t I A LLt� 10 • I I BRACKETS ARE 52"FROM &405 BOTTOM OF CEILING GRID &� -1]t 6251 B P-30] LL250 U-019 1 l I K-210 (2 -45G -241 �., G2a0 S-d50 460 K-699 5.Q9 U-250 -053 ilc • 2 Q L-- O 33 0 2 K-556 — - 5-005 241 � 0 0 � F.� —_ Gp0 6251 P _ 5.456 Q ---3� © ® 5639 4 (2 EA) -03" ` i® Sd40(2) 6 �] 60 239 S-45d 09 5-065 I Sdd1 F-920 4 �n K'6G4 .030 —— C2d0 (Z I} SSd6 I K fi99 G,OS C-900 C-0,B U'� 24 � 250 2)4 m • • �� K U-0)0 X61 • 0 -65) HI04 ® 5-005 O u09�0 I-1 O 13 L 13 L 13 O G 1 -004 I,ij 366 ] -41] 1 -d9t 120 F-t80 LL250 5M -544 628a -140 I 513 2b 5]0 Developed by: Border Foods �I �I h 965 Decatur Ave North HGolden Valley MN 55427 ❑ O I IrtreSy x2y taM His qan was pfepa,eE by me or 0 -1�A1nm sucena�an an eY c,l ste�eayamAaea Mcer',e uws a me slate n S SpnaWro: I`� EQUIPMENT/SEATING PLAN 1/4'=1'-0' A Name. G edak U DECOR Q HOOD FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM(ANSUL R-102) Reyshatlon: 14.853 a QTY. ITEM REMARKS QTY. ITEM REMARKS 1. REFER TO SCOPE OF WORK SHEETS(OF THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL)FOR ^ pn Mampb c RESPONSIBILITIES. `J SEE SHEET A1.1 FOR SECURITY DOOR PACKAGE Plgetl Cenlap. 1 SERVINGCOUMEfl INCLUDES SELFSUPPORTING FRAME Gt 1 'OPEN LATE'(40-1/2'W xW H) SEE Aso FOR LOCATION Proro Nua6er: %2591.9969 2 (H) SYMBOL DENOTES A HIGH TABLE OR DINING COUNTER WITH STOOLS. Q MAINTAIN 36'MIN CLEAR AISLE EGRESS PATHS TO EXIT DOORS. m 2 1 DINING SCREEN G2 1 -DRNE-THOU MAN'(301/2'W X 45'H) SEE Aso FOR LOCATION Pmt Hi9bq Wb m 0 - 0 SELF-SERVE DRNK COUNTER INCLUDED IN DISTRIBUTOR PACKAGE G9 1 'EMPTY STOMACH'(401/2'W X W'M SEE Aso FOR LOCATION �NOTE USED. PLANNING COMM RENEW 03.23.2012 rI d 1 CONDIMENT COUNTER - G9 1 TB OUAl1TY STATEMENT(26'W x 52 M) SEE A6.0 FOR LOCATION 3 O SYMBOL DENOTES A HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE TABLE.ACCESSIBLE (�DOT INDICATES CORE RILL LOCATION CORE DRILL LAYOUT TO BE PROVIDED BY - TABLES SHALL CONFORM TOADA DIMENSIONAL AND CLENLWCE THE SEATINGVENDOR.SEE DETAIL]/AB.S ANDSCOPE OF WORK CHANC>ECORE t O 1 SET TABLE PACKAGE INCLUDES TABLES,FRAMES,BOOTHS GS 1 NUTRITION POSTER' SEE AB.O FOR LOCATION REOUIREMENTS(SEE KEYNOTES 3,4/THIS SHEET aNd PROTOTYPE DRILL BITS TO MATCH DECOR BASE Siff TO MAINTAIN 3 Ar MAX GROUT LINE [MIN.S%(3 SEATS)SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE DECOR DRAWINGS);AND SHALL INCLUDE THEINTFANAPONAL SYMBOL AROUND BASE _ 1 G8 OF ACCESSIBILITY ENGRAVED/EMBOSSED(PERMANENTLYAPPLIEO)TO t'J PULL STATION @3'-e'AF.F. 8> 1 SET CHAIR PACKAGE - - G) THE TABLE TOP OR TABLE EDGE O7 - GAS LINE DOWN TO EOUIPMEM. _ Q , TRASH RECEPTACLE/TRAY RETURN-SINGLE - GENERAL NOTES C7 7 QB 010.TE LOCATION OF HORIZ PVC SYRUP CHASE THROUGH WALL TO ❑V' U• 0 1 TRASH flECEPTACLE/TMY RENRN-DOUBLE - l� 1 'KIDS MEAL DISPLAY'(21'W X 30'H) SEE AB.O FOR LOCATION O9 1 SETTEE - 09 22 GA S.S.PANELS w/EASED EDGES,SCREWED TO SHELVING STORAGE TYPE LINEAR FT New Building o O 1 DIVIDER .VIDEfl WALL t6 SPLASH GUARD. T-50,48 Seats:2,642 SF 1 SET ARTWORK PACKAGE REFER TO PLAN AND SCHEDULE(THIS SHEETI AND INTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEETS A8o d AS,I FOR LOCATIONS 11 NOT USED. 13 d BENCH SETTEE FflEE STANDING(NO CORE DRILL) DRYSTORAGE 45.5 , PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR GATE HINGES IN WALL EQUIPMENT AND SEATING 2 1I - NOT USED COLD STORAGE 24 15 1 FROM ENTRY SOFFIT-SUSPENDED FROM CEILING SUSPENDED FROM CEILING FROZENSTORAGE 6 • 16 NOT USED SUSPENDED FROM CEILING THE NUTRITION MATERIALS(ACRYLIC HOLDER.NUTRITION POSTER AND BRAND NUTRITION BROCHURES)ARE PART OF ANEW RESTAURANTS GRAND OPENING KIT AND Prgetl 201,.Ofi.t1 c ARE PROVIDED BY YUM FORMS. e (TOTAL _ 0O,am tt— 0.X 6M A2•0 SEATING PACKAGE-9 V CC TI VENDOR U.O.N. C A TC 501, C SCNEDUL SIJEL'!!MC QL'A.T!T!ES F!ECS'!RED C2 KEYNOTES a TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER �I WCL Assoclates. Inc. NOTE:SEE FULLERTON BUILDING SYSTEMS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. aa31 Waxl6sln sveel sane l60 �24_ -007 51.LOals Park,M:nnesola 2 8 55416 v T'O"MCH A42 18 V-w 21 18 T..952_Sat-9969 1 4X 1 4X 2 3 F.951.511A554 a.2-10• _ 2 5 C 11 3 TO.TOWER 15 1 t A42 i6 3 e � 0T T�O.WALL I I 9 s-s 1 r °t T.o.wAll 51— I T.O.BAND — - N— _ 2 1 L— J 11 3 IL /V"5VE, �_ V-065 , 2 V-075 15 J c/L aRACKErs,nP. _ < M 4 N A42 `—{1 I--� � 4 O -311 4 4 V-31t V-052 4 O . "RIG 2'-O'TYP-� X70 TYP 15 JOIST BEAFiINGING-`� Taco 6 1 1 TTOM OF CANOPY,TYP. V-086 4 23 TYPO 23 3 B 1 1 Bell I 9'-P 11`..5, �.TREWS/AWNING � 1 ® 4X ® ® t0 t 1 6 3z F N B5 oklynn Center,lMN 55429 6 8 763-560.5203 - T.O.SfA6 TYP 17 8 TYP. 6 6 N 9 28 3 7 12 7 17 6 12 7 17 17 A42 g.3- CRITICAL E FS ABOVE OPENING n�(�O O O V c RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION +/4•=,-0 A Go`'�LG QTY ITEM DESCRIPTION ELEC Q V HIGH IMPACT DRAINABLEE.I.F.S.TYPICAL AT ALL E.I.F.S.4o-GRADE/SIDEWALK • LOCATIONS;CARRY TO 6-0'A.F.F.(U.N.O.). V-0fi0 3 TACO BELL BELL'SIGN 4'-10112W x 4'6 IAN X V-062 NOT USED BO HORIZONTAL TRIM BAND-1 I? E THICK I.F.S.,WITH 5-}VERTICAL DIMENSION. SEE DETAIL 12/A6.2. 7-065 3 TACO BELL SIGN 9'-2W z 91/871 X © EXPRESSION PANEL BANDS.2-THICK E.I.F.S.x 6 WIDE,SEE 13,15616/A8.2. pO SERVICE DOOR BANDS.2-THICK E.I.F.S.z6"WIDE WITH HIGH IMPACT MESH,SEE DETAILS 5 8 14/A62. SIGN SCHEDULE ' v-006 1 TACO BELL CANOPY"'SW x 4•-69 x 1-071 X NOTE Developed by:,I V-052 3 TACO BELL CANOPY 9-1W x4'-6'Dx 1'WH W1 LETTERS X REFER TO WALL LEGEND EIA1.0 FOR EXTERIOR WALL FINISH ASSEMBLIES. Border FOODS B4ND COLOR V-075 2 TACO BELL ARCHED TRELLIS CANOPY V-086 11 TACO BELL LIGHT FUTURE X aI V-307 3 TB STEP20OLD FLYING ARCH 16-SWZ3'-3'+1'-371x3-0-D °I V-311 4 TACO BELL TRELLIS CANOPY T-6W x i'-071 x 2'-WO JAMB CONDITION V-312 2 TACO BELL TRELLIS CANOPY 5-6W x,.-0 7 x 2-0'D 965 Decatur Ave North F-� CONTACT O OR Golden Valley MN 55427 3 TIM SALERNO HEAD5ILL CONDITION 800-62&2738 x6502(phone) 321-978-0267 Qax) I my air na1 M.plan was prepared by me m l] Isalerm(al-stoCOrp.can upervs'mn and IaM am s Oury NOT USED 1 NOT USED N.T.S. G REQUIRES LIGHT FIXTURE(S).SEE ELECTRICAL ereea amnnea under me lawsW be6 lea O ud NOTE:ADDITIONAL INFORMATION M AVAILABLE ON THE N PLANS.WM.COM WESSITE.SEE'SIGNAGE AND AWNING INFO.' t � °01 SYMBOL AREA MANUFACTURER COLOR ALTERNATE MFR. ALTERNATE COLOR Q TACO BELL MAIN WALL COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS Sin1AMELBACK• ACCENT BAND COLOR TRANSITION N.T.S. E APPURTENANCES SCHEDULE N.TS. D E.I.F.S.THICKNESS Nr.s. B °ma" oa..cMm 1O 1'DRAINABLE E.I.F.S.SEE E.I.F.S.LEGEND,THIS SHEET. 17 CULTURED STONEWAINSCOT AND CAPSTONE.SEE N/A42 AND 7,8,17,18,19/A62.SOLID GROUT, Repiabalbn: 14,a43 ❑2 TACO BELL ACCENT COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS 6657'AMBER WAVE" MISCELLANEOUS ALL STONES,TO SCRATCH TER SUBSTRATE WITH NATURAL COLORED MORTAR;DEEP RAKED A SEE S A1.1 WINDOW TYPES'FOR WINDOW ELEVATIONS. O DURO-LAST DRIP EDGE FLASHING;SEE KEYNOTE 22 FOR COLOR.SEE DTLS.1,2/A,,, TO 3/6'FROM SURFACE Frolecl eanUA Dean Marion TACO BELL ACCENT BAND COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS 2823 WOOKWOOD CLAM B SEE SCOPE OF WORK FOR RESPONSIBILITIES. ,g REFER TO SHEET A4.2 FOR PARAPET PAINTING DIRECTIONS 95I.Se1.5969 Q C. 'HIGH IMPACT'MESH SHALL BE USED AT ALL RAISED TRIM BANDS@ ENTRIES,WINDOWS O OPEN FACE SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT,SEE DETAIL 4/A6.4 Pnone Number: .= O TACO BELL PARAPET BAND COLOR SHERWIN WILIJAMS 6383'GOLDEN RULE' &EX RESSION PANELS U.O.N.SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 19 GAS METER.DO NOT PAINT METER. Pnm Hialory R4 m D. THE PRIM COLORS SHOWN ARE COLOR REFERENCES FOR THE ELF.S.SUPPLIER ©CANOPY AND TRELLIS.SEE SCOPE OF WORK PLANNING COMM REVIEW 03.23.2012 E ELF.S.TEXTURE SHALL BE'FIN (2j)TACO BELL'FLYING'ARCH. $ 48 TACO BELL PARAPET BAND COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS 2861-AVOCADO' O BUILDING SIGN,SEE SCOPE OF WORK H � R PAINT ALL EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS U.N.O. 21 RTU LOCATION BEYOND. TACO BELL PARAPET BAND COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS 2803'ROCKWOOD TERRA COTTA' ©WALL LIGHTING,CENTER OVER EXPRESSION PANEL OR AS SHOWN.HT.AS INDICATED. _ - SEE SHEET E4.0 ®IF W RO-LAST EDGE TRIM IS USED.USE MANUFACTURED FINISH. 4D TACO BELL PARAPET BAND COLOR SHERWIN WILLAMS 6558-RUMMY' SEALERS(REFER TO WALL : A SEAIANT AT ALL WALL AND ROOF PENETRATIONS. Q STAINLESS STEEL CORNER GUARD SIMILAR TO DETAIL 191A6.5. 23 SEE DETAILS 13,15,16/A6.2 FOR ACCENT TRIM;REFER TO E.I.F.S.LEGEND,THIS SHEEP. ❑5 TACO BELL PARAPET CAP COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS A)61)IRON ORE' 22 DUROLAST EDGE MEDIUM BRONZE B SEALANT AT ALL WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES AT HEAD AND JAMB.DO NOT SEAL SILL@ OLINE OF TRANSITION FROM TYPICAL EI.F.S.-T0.HIGH IMPACT E.I.F.S. 24 NOT USED. �- O TRIM (FACTORYFINISH) WINDOWS. O 25 NOT USED. CORONADO IDAHO DRYSTACK-CARMEL OWENS CORNING PROSTONE LEDGERSTONE 9 HOSE BIB-REFER TO DETAIL 19/A6.3.ALIGN W1 ADJACENT PERPENDICULM INTERIOR O " 7 �6 BUILDING STONE LEGEND: WALL NOT USED. � MEREDITH ZIGLER MOUNTAIN,CULTURED STONE KATHY MANNON ^/INTAGE WINE' Nd 254-0046 VENEER 86631S-508, PRO-482284 ® A 10 CO2 FILLER VALVE B COVER. 27 NOTE USED. �i VENDOR SCOPE INCLUDES SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION OF AWNINGS, New Building,6 STONESILL/WATER TABLE CORONADO CHABLIS.CHISELED CULTURED OWENS CORNING PROSTONE LEDGERS TON 11 ROOF ACCESS LADDERS. BAND PAINTED STEEL U-CHANNEL TO EXTEND TO TOP OF WAINSCOT.PAINT TO MATCH ACCENT T-50,48 Seats:2,642 SF o MEREDITH ZIGLER STONE SILL KATHY MAN ON TAUPE• CPNOPIES,AND SIGNAGE O 29 BAND AROUND DOOR. 9a9-2544X146 B6F31S5081 12 STEEL BOLLARD.SEE SITE DETAILS. (2E)SPLASH BLOCK 13 ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR EQUIPMENT.REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. ®NOT USED. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS STONE MORTAR DAMS COLORS TRUE-TONE-MCSS LIGHTEST OR EQUAL REFER TO AVA4.2 FOR PANTED'EXPRESSION PANEL'PAINTING DIRECTIONS.SEE 31 NOT USED. i ❑7 PIPE BOLLARDS STREET SMART YELLOW-1/4'THICK PLASTIC COVER(L.G.POSTMAN.COM)OR EQUAL CRITICAL FINISH OPENINGS: 14 OETAIL9/A62. 15 INDICATES ROOF BEYOND. ®INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBIUTY(IF REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODE). • 8 TACO BELL TONER CAP COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS 614fi'UMBER' A BUILDING FINISH OPENINGS THAT ARE DESIGNATED AS'CRITICAL'SHALL BE O Pmlea 11111.06.11 MAINTAINED TO PROVIDE FOR THE STANDARD INSTALLATION OF STANDARD SIGNAGE/ HORIZONTAL TRIM BAND.SEE DETAILS 12/A5.2 BAND PAINT COLOR SHALL BE APPLIED pawn D3N FI BUILDING ELEMENTS,VERIFY DIMENSIONS WITH SIGN VENDOR 16 TO TOP,BOTTOM E FACE OF BAND-SEE E/M.O. A4.0 EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE H GENERAL NOTES F KEYNOTES C TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER s ©mom © II �� ,. I/, ©p TAC;C� BEL� pO ,:I . • %/% r MA s_ �m _ eo__meo___ _vmg -. _��v ��--�r_��� sr�_oo--�_��_�--�_�--�_�--�_��v� I• �v_�--�_sa.-�_!9--v:.�-.v: ��ii:c���� .�o��_���_���_���_���_���_sa•�...�sa� ido ®BO_®ee.°gQ®go.ogo .oBo.i.lyo p • 1 .� ��* - �-1 © • . -• _--fir i ii/�/iiii��.•-.. ■ice.■ 1 ii� — ere-- _ Nis '.a e i ®� i' — :���i�_� a�i■ i B�-��� e��—���—_�--- ---�� — - �.a� _ °rte �� —B .B �:g •_ 1 MOP MEN_vc —.i•_��®e��iDleiT 0 m WCL Associates. Inc. (NOTCHED)TACO BELL FLYING ARCH.REFER TO SCOPE OF WORK. 7 I(LIGHTING FIXTURE PAJNTEDALUMINUMFASC iA AND A8.0 ISEESHEETE32 49Jt West JSin skeet s.d.m ROOFING OVER 60 M11-BrIUTHENE x snub Perk,Minnesota 95254 51 F. DBL a BLOCKING FLYING ARCH SUPPORT BLOCKING,SE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR MORE INFO. A6.3 el r7 --------------- ------- T TOP OF PLATE ---------- VOP'CIF 15E TOP OF PLATE DURALAST ROOFING P OF PLATE 0 PARAPET FRAMING ABS MEMBRANE DURA-LAST ROOFING 3 DURA-LAST ROOFING MEMBRANE OVER 142'ID(TERIOR GRADE E.I.F.S.STARTER TRACK ASO PLYWO 24 STUDS AT IV D.C. MEMBRANE DURO-LAST SINGLE PLY DURO-LAST SINGLE PLY Taco ROOFING MEMBRANE OVER RIGID INSULATION OVER RIGID INSULATION DUROLAIT SINGLE PLY Bell ROOFING MEMBRANE rl 2 BOARD OVER 51W T. ROOF RIG MEMBRAN BOARD OVER 51WEXT. GRADE PLYWOOD. OVER RIGID INSULATION GRADE PLYWOOD. BOARD 5� 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard 12 GRADE PLYWOODOVER E�'T. Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 COORDINATE BLOCKING LOCATIONS P83 A62 763-560-5203 WITH SIGNAGE VENDOR OYPJ.SEE SCOPE OF WORK COORDINATE BLOCKING LOCATIONS WITH SIGNAGE VENDOR(TYP.) (2)NG CONT.TOP PLATES SIM 12 BUILDING SIGNAGE. A6.3 SEE SCOPE OF No (2)W CONT.TOP PLATES %L L1 L 7-1/K.. -------------- Olk"is BRG.HT. I? TRUSS BRG- --------- BRIG.HT. TRUSS BAG HT ROOF TRUSS-------—-------------------- REFERTO STRUCT.DWGS FOR SIZES, LOCATIONS EL la-V CEILING - ----------------------------- AND PROFILES ------------- .......... J-Box HOC EI LING OCKING @ AN WE W NO BLOCKING AT CLG.(TYP.) ----------------A (TYP) SO.HEA.DER1 WHERE OCCURS M W IILOCKINGATCLr WINDOW HEAD R.O. 1 7 "-4 A8.1 I ---ELL * CEILING-0 CEILING-0- L -t Developed by: 01,6'11EWEI�----------- SUSPENDED CEILING:REFER TO STALICT.DWGS.FOR Er-4-OR 6-10'@ KITCHEN HEADER SIZES Border Foods 9 EL r-4 1/44' HEADER-SEE STRUCTURAL 19-W @ DINING _----------------- 965 Decatur Ave North M WD BLOCKING AT MID-SPAN(TYP-) Golden Valley MN 55427 DRrVE-THOU WINDOW PASS-THRU UNIT. SEE SCOPE OF WORK STOREFRONT WINDOW SYS I hl-y.-Y Plan�P­1d by—1 under.Yd—t­--ft 1—duIy 0 Lyl SECURITY DOOR SEE SHEET 10. f- STONE WAINSCOT Name: Lbw Clark le, SCHEDULED FINISH gi—ti- FRIP OVER I1Z p_� man�wn 1/2'GYP.BOARD---------------- PLYWOOD P—N..-: + R.O.--------- - ILL(R.O.) IVE TH 17 PLANNING COMM REVIEW 03.212012 EIFS OVER PLYND SHEATHING A62 CULTURED STONE VENEER GYP. W s' AINSCOT A8 2 SIM, LI ................... ELLS TO.SLAB ------ %L ----------- 1g. New Building ----------- P OF SLAB 9�Q� A 4 T-50,48 Seats:2,642 SF SEE STRUCT.DINGS.FOR FOUNDATION SEE STRUCT.DWGS.FOR FOUNDATION AND 1 WALL SECTIONS SLAB DETAILS SEE STRUCT.DWGS.FOR FOUNDATION AND .4 CONC.CURB 4 • AND SLAB DETAILS SLAB DETAILS NOTE: 10 BOTTOM OF CANOPY �T ;E A&I .10 ABOVEFINSIH W11-11 BE Pawn O9M A5.0 WALL SECTION AT SERVICE DOOR 3/4• D WALL SECTION AT DINING WALL SECTION DRIVE•THRU AREA 314* TYPICAL WALL SECTION 3/4• 1--0• A ! TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER WCL LANDSCAPING NOTES PFUEAS FIELD DIRECTED BY Associates. Inc. LAND%APE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE I. ALL 5HRU0 BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED MITE 4'DEPTH OF 1-1/2'BUFF LIMESTONE APPEARANCE(RETAIN NORMAL SHAPE) • ROCK MULCH OVER HEED BARRIER OrQ&R TO APPROVE ROCK SAMPLE PRIOR TO PLANT TOP OF FOOTBALL 1-2'ABOVE INSTALLATION POLY-EDGER TO BE VALLEY VIEW BLACK DIAMOND OR APPROVED ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE EQUAL. KEEP MULCH 2'FROM TRJNK. 2. RANDOM 51ZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND 51ZE TO COMPLIMENT HEM LANDSCAPING. OWPBL To APPROVE BOULDER SAME PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 3. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM KTH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF :H...4:•;_` - o EXISTING TRADE Interiors 7 3•` ' R00T5 AT OUTER EDGE OF FOOTBALL LOOSENED NA25I72YMQl STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK FROM DISEASE, 4931 WIV ism street DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION COMPACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING �- I To ENSURE PROPER BAGKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACT sea,200 Id PL.UMEINES1 MI OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR RING OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD. -�7 I C-I - I- SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE SL Lou¢Park,Minnesota 1 BOLk B U I ng 1 '¢ I I III BACKFILL AS PER T"95z.sa16-9969 1"g[aY Bank' 4. UPON P15COVBRY OF A DISCREPANCY BETNEEN THE GIUANTTY OF PLANTS SPECIFICATION F_952..511-9551 .B-anmar SHOWN ON 11E 56HEOULE AND THE QUANTITY 5140M ON THE PLAN,THE PLAN SHALL T �L -,I GAL DO NOT EXCAVATE BELOW www.wUa cwn FOOTBALL.. 40 5. CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE I SHRUB ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT.LANDSCAPE MATERIALS N T S PART of TIE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR TWO(2)RILL 6ROWING ,rap D`=3D `SisD'I53 ` SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE PfiAE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE �/ DD.3 MSG.SD LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE 6.AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4'LAYER LOAM AND 500 AS SPECIFIED UMLE9i OTFEM5E NOTED ON THE DRAPU SS. THREE 2'xN4 nB'vr,oDEN S LE5 STAINED `..'s"a" 1•-. 5 25 p1 W 1 ° 1 7.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD _ BROWM HITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE THMI5TEO UTILITES,L16HTIN6 FWWRC5,DOORS AND WINDOr5.CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN To ONE ANOSTHEF WIRE SMALL BE PLACED ND THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF i - 2 Y y - - PROTECT EXISTING 1' ' BY THE LANDS-,GAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR AND SHRUBS FORLREVIBY AND APPROVAL n TREES TO REMAIN TFROIITH BLACK RLBBEF HOSE COLLARS B�'•- ( sss.:r TRUK FLARE JJr TION, SHALL.► �' \ H.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL PLANT TREE 1'-2'ABOVE I AM ILPLAGE 50D D Ir ACCEPTANCE EXISTING GRADE Taco MULCH TO `" CH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER KEEP I TO, 1,�,Yy'� 2 61. T� 1 q, REPAIR AT NO COST TO OYAE2 ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDFAAPE MULCH 2'FROM TIRIRK. TEGT 5 AS ��, , ° ' CONTRACTOR'S ACTVlTe,. Bell T EXISTING ,N BFHLK PA TO REMA To REMAIN r - / ON SAND 0 7p 10. SYa�AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED EXISTING GRADE FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS ACTIVITIES. 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard CUT Alto AMID BURLAP REMOVE PL AP FROM TOP 1/3 Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 1 3 5D J Cl 11. REPAIR AT NO LOS TO THE OMER IRMSATION SYSTEM DAMAGED FROM r- OF ROOT BALL.IF NON-BIODEGRADABLE. -avzs rf . '-• `,_=;- I II 763-560-5203 LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. I I i / IFJ REMOVE COMPLETELY Z SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE G ` `r� •'1a sY:r .GpS y,,�1 t 12.INSTALL PAVERS PER MANIFAGTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND AS SHOWI ON THE VI` I I� I Ip18 I�- 8 ° t1 li PLAN Or?ER TO SELECT PAVER TYPE AND DOLOR I FI I I�I I J BAGKFILL AS SPECIFIED ' GCS `M�l��"' Q 13. PROVIDE IFRIGATICIN SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION 5Y5TEM SHALL BE A �TH .E TIMES WIDTH DO NIOT EXCAVATE REPLACE DAMAGES ', 3 ~ `',�1 .. , FULLY PftOGWVMIABLE SYSTEM CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING.THE of ROOTBALL BELOW FOOTBALL lxe To TRUCnoµ BdM�1 AS NEEDE) 1 3 CF ; 1 4 5D _ `, Z srsTFM SHALL PROVIDE HEAD ro HEAD COVERAGE AND 13E CAPABLE of DEG I DUOUS TREE: � BOULDER(TIP) '� m - DMIVE RING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PER W®C.SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO 2 N T 5 J+ 4 AN `VF's 1 THE PUBLIC RI6M-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OF PATHHWAY/BAGK OF CURB. 56 3•F M 131 X111 C �• $ •�� va t 'JT 6 1 AF J-KA PAVERS ;s _ . 1 .,. - J m LANDSCAPE POINT SYSTEM - NNN4 r`; . �' I� � - 1' �i`� i _- � 5 a? L ii SITE AREA:26,509 5F=Obl AG 4� 1 Bo POINTS RC-GIUIRED (1 N ,F POLY-EDGER") POINTS PROVIDED, I-EXISTING 21•Tiff OA n (}l 7C v ` - '" •: `11 BoLlDez(TYP) 1 4O P12 X05®2-112•TREES 2200.0 • - D T— 1 TOTAL POINTS PROVIDED 801 G PA Z D BASE A s _ 1 PLANT SCHEDULE: o Z d 3 LP ---_Y ,M z i QTY. SYM. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME ROOT MIN SIZE COMMENTS DECIDUOUS TREES •: - --2 BH e _ •Er 9. N ,3 - - 1 4 M ' 1 1 I AF ,� AMUR FLAME TREE Auer ginnala flame' BIB 2 V2'GAL. SINGLE TRUNK-TREE FORM Sf ^ 40 ?e .P ; { '� � 1 2 - ARMSTRONG MAPLE Aeer x freemmll'Armstrong' BIB 2 V2'GAL. STRAIGHT LEADER-FALL FORM Developed by: 111 2 NW =,1') GR@FaPLRE LIN DEN Tlm cordata'Grserspre' BIB 2 U2•LAL STRAIGHT LEADER-I91LL FORM Border Foods 1 -•�'' -y:a ss REPLACE 50D DAMAGED \ DUETO CON57TNICK DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 1 CP Q CRIMSON PYGMY.WPANE5E BARB92RY Berberls Uhmbergn'CrWson Pyyny' CONT. m3 DENSE BRANCH BH /Q, BUSH HOtEYSUGKLE Dlervma loniCera CONE a3 � H 965 Decatur Ave North 18 AN Q ANTHONY WATER 5PIREq Spraea x burnlda'Mthony Waterer' GOUT. 13 DENSE BRANCH Golden Valley MN 55427 1111 'i PBRBUJIAL5 KARL FORESTER 6RA:{ Calamagrostb acutUlaa'Karl Forester' CANT. sl 48'NT,36'SPACING I nerebM cen�y mat lt,H Pun was Prew�nr re•ar RUDY STELLA DAYLILLY Hemerogalus Ruby Stella' GOUT. sl 24'Hi.,24 SPACING �^v myerea suPam ana wt l are a ay v ^ '• a ' 2m=m Imasax anW­1 001 UJ 6 SC SHENAN DOAH REED SWTCH GRAYS Palm vrgbu 5hemdOW CANT. s1 48'HT,36A NY sat.o,Minnesota 6 1 Cr- I e I INDIAN 92AHR CONEFLOWER Redo-kla h".W1.5t—' CONT. al 48'NT,36'SPACING , : U — Na,rc: Pa1riQJ5aner Re9isaeion: 24901 Ym LEGEND veyea eoRtw: Dean MaEt,n m Y t't•: 9s3.54..9 Phone Nun4er: LIMIT OF 500 I LIMIT OF M1LGN C T SUB MITTAL 3 Mau 0 s, CITY SUBMITTAL rp0—PROPOSED TREE 3 PROPOSED SFHM)S-SIZE VARIE5'fE 5CHEDULE ®. h ®- & EXISTING TREE-APPROXIMATE LOCATION New Building Y T-50,48 Seats:2,642 SF 5 LANDSCAPE PLAN f a • /; Projea 201 i.Ofi.11 1 —w Drawn DSM L -I LANDSCAPE PLAN M"–za-p 1 Dea TACO BELL BROOKLYN CENTER Taco Bell 5532 Brooklyn Blvd. Lane Application No. 2012-005 City Council Meeting April 23, 2012 Agenda Item No. 9.b Introduction •Border Foods, Inc., requesting Site & Building Plan approval and Variance (to City Code Section 36-703) to reconstruct a new 2,642 sq. ft. Taco Bell restaurant •Subject site was originally approved as a Zantigo Mexican Restaurant in 1985 by site plan and special use permit. •City records reveal the old restaurant changed ownership and was remodeled into a Taco Bell in 1992. •The Applicants are seeking this change due to the site constraints and needs to serve their customers safely and more effectively in their drive-thru service lane. All commercial sites in this block served by private roadway known as Brooklyn Boulevard Lane Property zoned Property zoned CC--2 2 ((Commerce)Commerce) All uses have a percentage share in ownership and maintenance of said roadway Current LayoutCurrent Layout •2,292 sf. restaurant •42 parking spaces •Outdoor/Screened dumpster area New Site PlanNew Site Plan �Ir� � �� Wi.bsL� IiYNYYldlir �.� 9'i.Yl i,1YY. � r� Yi1�Yl�.Iili1i I � tuluu..rwa �•_ I � - - — TACO BELL . .,...� uleuc;K_rll eEnitlt 11111 Ifs MAIN ENTRY MILE VATIOM .._.w......_,.. Hamel 111 v r'l SIDE ENTRY ELEVATION col HEAR ELEVATION er.�llonk 3LlY`AfiolMi rcrc r. A-1 If q'� WOVE TH&LU ELEVATION Interior LayoutInterior Layout Landscape PlanLandscape Plan Variance need… Sect. 35-703: No two driveways on any single parcel of land in a business or industrial district shall be less than 50-feet apart at the property line. The two northerly drives would be 38-ft. apart, requiring a 12-ft. variance to this 50-ft. standard According to Minnesota Statutes 2010, Section 462.357, Subdivision 6. Appeals and Adjustments: Variancesshallonlybepermittedwhentheyareinharmonywiththegeneral purposesandintentoftheordinanceandwhenthevariancesareconsistentwiththe comprehensiveplan.Variancesmaybegrantedwhentheapplicantforthevariance establishesthattherearepracticaldifficultiesincomplyingwiththezoning ordinance."Practicaldifficulties,"asusedinconnectionwiththegrantingofa variance,means: a)that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; b)the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and c)the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Planning Commission Recommendation This matter was presented under public hearing before the City Planning  Commission at the April 12, 2012 regular meeting. One resident/member of the audience requested allowance for mechanical  doorways to provide easier access; franchise owner agreed to look into or address as part of the building permit consideration. No other public comments were made. Planning Commission felt the Applicant’s request for Variance was  reasonable; the circumstances of the site were unique; would not alter the essential character of the locality; and the site plan met the criteria used to consider such a variance. Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Commission  Application No. 2012-005, which comprehends the approval of a Variance to City Code Section 35-703 and the Site and Building Plan approval of a new 2,642 sf. Taco Bell restaurant, subject to the ten conditions memorialized in the resolution of approval. Requested Action Adopt the City Council Resolution that affirms the Planning  Commission recommendation to approve Planning Commission Application No. 2012-005, which comprehends the approval of a Variance to City Code Section 35-703 and the Site and Building Plan approval of a new 2,642 sf. Taco Bell restaurant , including the conditions memorialized in said resolution. QUESTIONS? Conditions of approval…. 1.The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2.Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3.A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure the completion of site improvements. 4.Any future roof-top or ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 5)The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 6)An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 7)Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 8)B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 9)The applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 10)All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center’s current standard specifications and details. ❑._ - - - El - __ o o o. g o ❑ 0 0 ❑ p p ❑ 0 o - - o El, r ° i - 0 L J ❑ 0 0 0 — r ❑. ❑. -0 ❑ ❑ 0 °_ o ❑ El El El- EM GEM s IADDITIONAL INRbRMATION. nYa -0en '�iONFA- s ro -'-- /'r _ es,n rV V Y rr DC� �BPPCMETS.IYP, 2 AI Y9 , � 7"• 2E' Y Ya Y , � M1P.Y> 6 r fi 6 fi N 5 2 ] 2 T MS I IN NN - - �EffSO�VE F - se � :INSTALL TREE '4 PRQTECWN FENCE D t _ AS NECESSARY ] � Y x A LT FENCE CQN91MUCTION 0 a s , ENTRANCE INLET SILT FENCE INLET TINLET PRCTECTIC V(TYP) 3Q 55.30 tC3 `LY. Ri CTIO! 1 w4 r` Ci EN'57ThG s 11 � :- h? t i I SILT FENCE } ' k 9 00 U } SILT FENCE 1�. INC 0 5.!5() 55.54 4 7.56 �,• 3'U � `� 4� K 958. `s � _ - `mss�� SILT FENCE Pik�I¢ i _ gem t� r a co l �n b r 120 • $� ate__ � .�- - =r, i ,r' airs _+'`� F95'�e•ic�W W ��ra p�� ����O��o � .2 V 4 8 ~ i. �E W � are�'�.Wy -' - y W W yC, yC +e AIN ,1.61 �� C] y� � ,we�f.C•i�'k #' City Council Agenda Item No. 10a i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 23,2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson City Clerk �� �n� Y SUBJECT: Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for 5240 Drew Avenue North Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the issuance of a Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License and Mitigation Plan for 5240 Drew Avenue North. If the Council chooses not to issue the license, it is recommended that the motion be to direct staff to prepare proposed findings for denial of the rental license for the next Council meeting. Background: This owner is applying for a renewal rental license. This property qualifies for a Type IV provisional rental license based on twenty property code violations (2/unit)found during the initial rental license inspection and six validated police incidents/nuisance calls (0.60/unit) for the past twelve months. The property was previously licensed as a Type III Rental License. Based on the number of property code violations and validated police incident/nuisance calls,the property only qualifies for a Type IV Rental License. Staff from Administration,Building& Community Standards and Police Departments worked with the property owner regarding a mitigation plan,which requires Phase I, II and III of the Crime Free Housing Program, and other items included by City ordinance for a Type IV License. A meeting was held with the property owner Brad Schumacher and his local agent Paul Miller to discuss ways to address property and licensing concerns including the validated police incident/nuisance calls,high number of other public safety calls, and ongoing property maintenance. A Mitigation Plan has been developed addressing the requirements of the ordinance and any issues specific to the property. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the Type IV Rental License on condition of adherence to the Mitigation Plan. Please refer to the attached copy of the Mitigation Plan for more information. The following is a brief history of the license process actions: 01-11-2012 The owner, Brad Schumacher, applied for renewal of the rental dwelling license for 5240 Drew Ave N, a ten-unit multi-family building. 02-02-2012 The initial rental license inspection was scheduled, however the owner called to reschedule to 02-28-2012. 02-28-2012 An initial rental inspection was conducted, 20 property code violations were cited, see attached rental criteria. 03-30-2012 A second rental inspection was conducted and passed. 03-30-2012 City records indicate 6 validated police incident/nuisance calls occurred in the past twelve months including theft on 05-17-2011, burglary on 09-22-2011, Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the duality of life for all people and preserves the public trust i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM burglary on 10-21-2011, assault on 11-20-2011, disturbance on 03-10-2012, and disturbance on 03-29-2012. 03-31-2012 The previous Type III rental license expired. 04-03-2012 A letter was sent to the owner(s)notifying of qualification for Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License, including additional requirements to obtain a rental license. I.e. submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases I,II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc. 04-04-2012 The property was posted as unlicensed. 04-06-2012 A Mitigation Plan was submitted. 04-11-2012 The Mitigation Plan was finalized. 04-12-2012 A letter was sent to the owner notifying that the hearing before the Council will be held 04-23-2012. Previous Type III Rental License process activities: 02-28-2011 The owner,Brad Schumacher, applied for a renewal of the rental dwelling license for 5240 Drew Avenue N, a ten-unit multi-family building. 03-31-2011 The previous rental license expired. 04-05-2011 An initial rental inspection was conducted (three property code violations were cited(.3/unit), see attached rental criteria) and passed with weather deferral. 04-05-2011 City records indicate six validated police incident/nuisance calls (.6/unit) occurred in the past twelve months. 05-23-2011 The City Council approved a Type III rental license. 05-23-2011 A letter was sent to the owner(s)notifying of qualification for a Type III Rental License, including requirements to obtain a rental license. Le. submit action plan, completion of Phases I, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc. 07-20-2011 A letter was sent from Building and Community Standards regarding Type III Rental License requirements. 08-11-2011 A$125 citation was issued for not submitting an action plan. 08-22-2011 A$250 citation was issued for not submitting an action plan. 09-27-2011 The Action Plan was received. 10-02-2011 The Action Plan was approved. 10-07-2011 A letter stating the final requirements was sent to the owner including a copy of the signed Action plan. 10-20-2011 An administrative hearing was held. The hearing officer ruled$125 due immediately after hearing, $250 stayed based on no same or similar violations within one year. (Records indicate nonpayment) 04-03-2012 A$125 citation was issued for not meeting action plan requirements for the Type III Rental License. If approved, after six months, a new rental license is required. The license process will begin in approximately four months. The new license will be based on the property code violations found during the initial renewal license inspection and the number of validated police calls for services for disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in 12-911. The terms of the mitigation plan must also be met. Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust l COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Excerpt from Chapter 12 of Citv Code of Ordinances: Section 12-913. TYPE IV PROVISIONAL LICENSES. 1. Rental properties that meet the provisional licensing criteria as described in Section 12- 901 are eligible only for provisional licenses. 2. The City will provide by mail to each licensee a monthly report of any police and fire calls and incidents and applicable property Code violations as described in Section 12- 901. 3. Mitigation Plan. The applicant for a provisional license must submit for Council review a mitigation plan for the license period. The mitigation plan shall describe steps proposed by the applicant to reduce the number of police and fire calls and/or the property Code issues described in Section 12-901 and 12-911 to a level that qualifies for a Type I, II, or III license. The mitigation plan may include such steps as changes in tenant screening procedures, changes in lease terms, security measures, rules and regulations for tenant conduct, security personnel, and time frame to implement all phases of the Crime Free Housing Program. 4. Council Consideration. The application with a proposed mitigation plan will be presented to the City Council together with a recommendation by the City Manager or the Manager's designee as to the disposition thereof. After giving the applicant an opportunity to be heard and present evidence,the Council shall approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions the application and the mitigation plan. If the Council disapproves an application and mitigation plan or approves it with conditions, it shall state its reasons for so doing in writing. In evaluating a mitigation plan,the Council will consider, among other things,the facility, its management practices,the nature and seriousness of causes for police and fire incidences and/or property Code issues and the expected effectiveness of measures identified in the plan to reduce the number of police and fire incidences and/or property Code violations. In evaluating a mitigation plan submitted by an applicant already under a provisional license, the Council will also consider the effectiveness of measures identified in the applicant's previous mitigation plan and the need for different or additional measures to reduce police and fire incidences and/or property Code violations. 5. Compliance with Mitigation Plan. The licensee shall comply with the mitigation plan as approved or modified by the Council. No later than the tenth day after each calendar month,the licensee shall mail or deliver to the City Manager a written report describing all steps taken in furtherance of the mitigation plan during the preceding month. Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Rental License Category Criteria Policy—Adopted by City Council 03-08-10 1. Determining License Categories. License categories are based on property code and nuisance violations noted during the initial or renewal license inspection or for a category verification inspection, along with excessive validated police service calls occurring over a year. License categories are performance based and more accurately depict the condition of the property and the City costs of service. 2. Fees. Fee amounts are determined by the costs of the city to license,inspect, monitor and work with the property to ensure category conditions are met. License fees do not include reinspection fees, late fees, charges for criminal or civil enforcement actions, or other penalties. 3. Category Conditions. The licensee or designated agent must meet the category conditions in the time period specified by the City. A licensee must meet all original conditions required by the License Category, even if a subsequent license category is achieved. 4. License Category Criteria. a. Property Code and Nuisance Violations. Property code violation rates will be based on the average number of property code violations per unit identified during the licensing inspection or category verification inspection. Property code violations for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include violations of property code and nuisances as defined in Chapter 12, 19, 7 and other applicable local ordinances. The City may,upon complaints or reasonable concerns that the establishment no longer complies with the license category criteria, perform a category verification inspection to the same standards as the license renewal inspection as indicated below. Inspections will be conducted in conjunction with established department policies. In cases where 100% of the units are not inspected,the minimum inspection standards will be established as follows: • At least 75% of units will be inspected for properties with 15 or less units. • At least 25% of units,to include a minimum of 12 units,will be inspected for properties with 16 or more units. i Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust �I I COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category Number of Units Property Code Violations per (Based on Property Inspected Unit Code Only) Type I—3 Year 1-2 units 0-1 3+units 0-0.75 Type II—2 Year 1-2 units Greater than l but not more than 4 3+''writs + Greater than=0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III— 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 4 but not more than 8 units Greater than 1.5 n but otmore than 3 Type IV—6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 8 3+'unit s Greater th an 3 b. Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault,burglary,theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are "Family or household members" as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 51813.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of"Domestic Abuse"as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 51813.01, Subd. 2 (a). License Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Category Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category 1-2 0-1 Impact 3-4 units 0-025 _ 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 Category 34-unit s Greater than 0.25 . but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 1-2 Greater than 3 Categories 3-4 units Greater than 1 - 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Council Goals: Strategic: - We will ensure a safe and secure community - We will stabilize and improve residential neighborhoods Attachment -Mitigation Plan I I I i Mission:Ensuring an attractive,e>clean,saf e inclusive community that enhances the quality of li f e for all people and preserves the public trust City of Brooklyn Center Phone:763-569-3300 TTY 711 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway fox:763-569-3360 Brooklyn Center,MN 55430-2199 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org Rental License Mitigation Plan--Type IV Rental License Handwritten plans will not be accepted.Please type or use fellable form on City website. Qwn�eNarite;Cint11CJ Lake Propel�l�s LtC °ogl AgeniBla Scilrlari>acier {` xr � e r j32855�127th St 7-itntpelman MN ti539$ Y`w� t .,�"��P✓r �`i' s s \�c �i ; O er Phone T - t t2 entPhone „;, z r e Email a tz ' A enfE a 1 , f a�S ; j i °M I?egtalLta�hm mew Q Rene}�a1� �urrentLicense�xprationDate 3130112 , s . ew�is'''�,': _i «._.4,.�.�.., _ _ _�`_� >SIx�lOn�7S OI1�Gw7:eflf.IFC�rJSe.$.Y 1rR�Oj7 - �;a_ .�v'..�•,5� f Based on property conditions and/or validated police nuisance incidents,the above referenced property I qualifies for a Type IV Rental License. Before your license application can be considered by the City Council, a Mitigation Plan must be completed and reviewed by City staff. A fully completed Mitigation Plan must be submitted immediately to ensure timely completion of the license application process. The Mitigation Plan should indicate the steps being taken to correct identified violations and the measures that will be taken to ensure ongoing compliance with City Ordinances and applicable Codes. The Mitigation Plan provides an opportunity to review property concerns and identify possible solutions to improve the overall conditions and management of the property. NOTICE; Time is Running Out--You must TAKE ACTION NOW in order to meet all the city ordinance r and Mitigation Plan requirements within this*pending license period and avoid legal actions. i ���cffo`fi�_�-��gtured�ncuhtents,�. Y �� � r M1�• k^i1,j��.3,[�tL -fr�ri.t "+l t� Ir\j 5._i. hf.._ . Submit the following documents with the Mitigation Plan for approval: 1, Crime Free Housing Program Training Certificate(if completed,if not completed,please include scheduled date in Section C. I y u 2. Copy of Lease including Minnesota Crime Free Housing Lease Addendum u v ' 3. Submit written report by 100'of each month(after license approval). Ssgt>LOnG_ rime;lFreeHousln`I'ro -ramie_uiromenfs.s ;r= el 1.1. Use written lease including Crime Free Rousing Lease Addendum. 2. Conduct criminal background check for all prospective tenants. Provide documentation to City if requested. f 3. Pursue the eviction of tenants who violate the terms of the lease or any addendums. Page 1 Type IV Mitigation Plan Rev 11-16-11 Q 4. Attend City approved eight hour Crime Free Housing course. Date Course Completed: 3/1912012 or Date Course Scheduled: Phase II i Complete Security Assessment and implement all security improvements recommended by the Brooklyn Center Police Department. Date Scheduled: 10/11/2011 Improvements to be completed by: 3/17/2012 Phase III ❑✓ I will attend a minimum of 50%of the ARM meetings(two). I will attend the ARM meetings scheduled for: 6/1212012,07/14/201 & 9H2/2012 Do these two meeting dates occur before the'"Pending Type IV License expiration date? 0 Yes❑No (*See Section A)If no,you will only be able to qualify for a Type IV Rental License upon renewal. i I will have no repeat code violations previously documented within the past year. For properties with four or more units: I will conduct resident training annually that includes crime prevention techniques. I will hold regular resident meetings. � i Sec#ionpIo_ri �`Ca 7 1 Ym ro.�emeri_ts� lan 3n }�' � " Based on condition and age,estimated replacement dates are provided for common capital items. Funding should be considered accordingly. However,items broken,worn or otherwise in violation prior to the estimated replacement date will require earlier corrections. Date Last Replaced Estimated Re lacement Date Fumace/AC- 2005 2025 Water Heater- 2005 2025 Kitchen Appliances- 20081sh 20211sh Laundry Appliances- 20081sh 201818h Exterior =Paint/Siding,fascia,trim 2005 2036 -Windows 2005 2055 -Roof 2011 2081 -Fence none none -Shed none none -Garage 2009 2058 -Driveway 2005 2035 i -Sidewalks Zoos 2038 Smoke Alarms&Carbon Monoxide Alarms 2010 2020 Other s .Sec�io°n's'{`,��'Ste`"s�o�I)ii: r�ue:�%�an�a e7nen>E�•`nd Con}c�ih_ous of�P�>Q eii i.��,����_�?���-�� . Implementing the following best practices may assist in the management of your property. B checking the boxes below,you agree to: II V 11. Check in with tenants every 30 days. 2. Drive by property to check for violations twice a month. Page 2 Type IV Mitigation Plan Rev 11-16-11 I! J 3. Evict tenants in violation of the lease and all addendums, M✓ 4. Provide lawn/snow service. 1 v 11 S. Provide garbage service. 1 6. Install security system. Cantlin Lake Properties F717. Provide maintenance service plan for appliances. Name of service co.: 8. I am and will remain current on payment of utility fees,taxes,assessments,fines,penalties and other financial claims due to the City, �✓ 9. Other(s): Please read thoroughly: If the Type IV Rental License is approved by the City Council,the Licensee must comply with the approved Mitigation Plan and all applicable city codes, No later than the 10a`of each calendar month,the licensee must submit to the Building and Community Standards Department a written report describing all steps taken to comply with the Mitigation Plan, I verify that all information provided above is true and accurate. I understand that if I do not comply with an approved Mitigation Plan,comply with all applicable ordinances within the license period,or operate beyond the license expiration date;enforcement actions such as citations,formal complaint or license review may result. Brad Schumacher Owner or A gent Name and Title(Please Print) �7 n 4-4-2012 Ow'-F]ovAjent Signature Date Additional Owner or Agent Name and Title(if applicable)(Please Print) Additional Owner or Agent Signature (if applicable) Date r For City Use--Mitigation Plan Approved By: Police Department/Title bd I 0 i -z- Bigiding&Community Standards Department Title _ Date i Page 3 Type IV Mitigatlon Plan Rev 11-16-11 City Council Agenda Item No. lOb i i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 23, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk &—'ro( SUBJECT: Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for 4306 651h Avenue North Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the issuance of a Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License and Mitigation Plan for 4306 65th Avenue North. If the Council chooses not to issue the license, it is recommended that the motion be to direct staff to prepare proposed findings for denial of the rental license for the next Council meeting. Background: This owner is applying for a new rental license. This property qualifies for a Type IV Provisional Rental License, based on 21 property code violations found during the initial rental license inspection. Staff from Administration, Building& Community Standards and Police Departments worked with the property owner regarding a mitigation plan, which requires Phase I, II and III of the Crime Free Housing Program, and other items included by City ordinance for a Type.IV License. A Mitigation Plan has been developed addressing the requirements of the ordinance and any issues specific to the property. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the Type IV Rental License on condition of adherence to the Mitigation Plan. Please refer to the attached copy of the Mitigation Plan for more information. The following is a brief history of the license process actions: 08-24-2011 The owner, Laura Ben, applied for an initial rental dwelling license for 4306 65th Avenue N, a single-family residential property. 09-16-2011 An initial inspection was scheduled but the owner called on 09-14-11 to cancel the inspection. 10-11-2011 An initial rental inspection was scheduled but no one was on site to meet the inspector. 10-17-2011 An initial rental inspection was conducted with the tenant on site. Twenty-one property code violations were cited, see attached rental criteria. 10-31-2011 A follow up inspection was scheduled. No one was on site to meet the inspector. 11-21-2011 Another follow up inspection was scheduled. No one was on site to meet the inspector. 11-28-2011 The inspector left a voice mail for the owner regarding the missed inspections. 12-06-2011 The owner, Laura Ben,was on site to meet the inspector and stated they did not receive any correction orders by mail nor did they receive the phone call messages. Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people anal preserves the public trust i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM 12-19-2011 A reinspection was conducted and passed the property maintenance inspection. The property manager met the inspector on site. $400 in reinspection fees have accrued. 12-28-2011 The inspector had a phone conversation with the owner regarding unpaid reinspection fees. 12-30-2011 The inspector had a phone conversation with the property manager regarding unpaid reinspection fees. 01-05-2012 The property was posted as unlicensed. 01-06-2012 The owner paid the reinspection fees. 01-06-2012 A rental inspection passed since reinspection fees were paid. 01-17-2012 A letter was sent to the owner(s)notifying of qualification for Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License, including additional requirements to obtain a rental license. I.e. submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases I, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc. 01-27-2012 A second letter was sent to the owner(s)notifying of qualification for Type IV 6- Month Provisional Rental License, including additional requirements to obtain a rental license. I.e. submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases 1, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc. 02-14-2012 A$125 citation was issued for failure to submit a mitigation plan. 03-20-2012 A$250 citation was issued for failure to submit a mitigation plan. 03-23-2012 A Mitigation Plan was submitted. 03-27-2012 The Mitigation Plan was finalized. 04-05-2012 A formal complaint was processed by the City Clerk for renting without a valid rental license since utility bills were not paid. 04-13-2012 The owner paid past due utilities. 04-16-2012 A letter was sent to the owner notifying that the hearing before the Council will be held 04-23-2012. If approved, after six months, a new rental license is required. The license process will begin in approximately four months. The new license will be based on the property code violations found during the initial renewal license inspection and the number of validated police calls for services for disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in 12-911. The terms of the mitigation plan must also be met. Excerpt from Chapter 12 of City Code of Ordinances: Section 12-913. TYPE IV PROVISIONAL LICENSES. 1. Rental properties that meet the provisional licensing criteria as described in Section 12- 901 are eligible only for provisional licenses. 2. The City will provide by mail to each licensee a monthly report of any police and fire calls and incidents and applicable property Code violations as described in Section 12- 901. I Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe community that enhances the qualio,of life andp•eserves thepublic trust I �I COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM 3. Mitigation Plan. The applicant for a provisional license must submit for Council review a mitigation plan for the license period. The mitigation plan shall describe steps proposed by the applicant to reduce the number of police and fire calls and/or the property Code issues described in Section 12-901 and 12-911 to a level that qualifies for a Type I, II, or III license. The mitigation plan may include such steps as changes in tenant screening procedures, changes in lease terms, security measures,rules and regulations for tenant conduct, security personnel, and time frame to implement all phases of the Crime Free Housing Program. 4. Council Consideration. The application with a proposed mitigation plan will be presented to the City Council together with a recommendation by the City Manager or the Manager's designee as to the disposition thereof. After giving the applicant an opportunity to be heard and present evidence,the Council shall approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions the application and the mitigation plan. If the Council disapproves an application and mitigation plan or approves it with conditions,it shall state its reasons for so doing in writing. In evaluating a mitigation plan,the Council will consider, among other things,the facility, its management practices,the nature and seriousness of causes for police and fire incidences and/or property Code issues and the expected effectiveness of measures identified in the plan to reduce the number of police and fire incidences and/or property Code violations. In evaluating a mitigation plan submitted by an applicant already under a provisional license,the Council will also consider the effectiveness of measures identified in the applicant's previous mitigation plan and the need for different or additional measures to reduce police and fire incidences and/or property Code violations. 5. Compliance with Mitigation Plan. The licensee shall comply with the mitigation plan as approved or modified by the Council. No later than the tenth day after each calendar month,the licensee shall mail or deliver to the City Manager a written report describing all steps taken in furtherance of the mitigation plan during the preceding month. i Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe comnnlnity that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust i COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM l Rental License Category Criteria Policy—Adopted by City Council 03-08-10 1. Determining License Categories. License categories are based on property code and nuisance violations noted during the initial or renewal license inspection or for a category verification inspection, along with excessive validated police service calls occurring over a year. License categories are performance based and more accurately depict the condition of the property and the City costs of service. 2. Fees. Fee amounts are determined by the costs of the city to license, inspect,monitor and work with the property to ensure category conditions are met. License fees do not include reinspection fees, late fees, charges for criminal or civil enforcement actions, or other penalties. 3. Category Conditions. The licensee or designated agent must meet the category conditions in the time period specified by the City. A licensee must meet all original conditions required by the License Category, even if a subsequent license category is achieved. 4. License Category Criteria. a. Property Code and Nuisance Violations. Property code violation rates will be based on the average number of property code violations per unit identified during the licensing inspection or category verification inspection. Property code violations for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include violations of property code and nuisances as defined in Chapter 12, 19, 7 and other applicable local ordinances. The City may,upon complaints or reasonable concerns that the establishment no longer complies with the license category criteria, perform a category verification inspection to the same standards as the license renewal inspection as indicated below. Inspections will be conducted in conjunction with established department policies. In cases where 100% of the units are not inspected,the minimum inspection standards will be established as follows: • At least 75% of units will be inspected for properties with 15 or less units. • At least 25% of units,to include a minimum of 12 units, will be inspected for properties with 16 or more units. Mission:Ensuring an attractive clean,saf e community that enhances the ualio�o f lf e and reserves the public trust f COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category Number of Units Property Code Violations per (Based on Property Inspected Unit Code Only) Type 1—3 Year 1-2 units 0-1 3+.units 0 40.75 - Type II—2 Year 1-2,units Greater than 1 but not more than 4 3+:units Greater than 0.75 but notmore than 1.5 Type III— 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 4 but not more than 8 3+;units Greater than-l.5 but not more than 3 Type IV—6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 8 3±units Greater than 3 b. Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide,rape, robbery, aggravated assault,burglary,theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are"Family or household members" as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 51813.01, Subd. 2(b) and where there is a report of"Domestic Abuse"as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (a). License Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Category Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category 1-2 0-1 Impact 3-4 units 0-0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 Category 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but no-t Aore than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 1-2 Greater than 3 Categories 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe conunwdot that enhances the 2ualio,of life and presefves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. II Council Goals: Strategic: -We will ensure a safe and secure community -We will stabilize and improve residential neighborhoods Attachment -Mitigation Plan Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe community that enhances the quality of life andpreserves thepuhlic trust i mmIPPOw City of Brooklyn Center Phone:763-569-3300 TTy711 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Fax.,763-569-3360 Brooklyn Center,MN 55430-2199 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org Rental License Mitigation Plan--Type IV Rental License Handwritten plans will not be accepted.Please type or use frllable form on City website. ' A cev R. SNEER- K", ja3�- - -#F==•.-"�i . i#sue,4 t >� 5�� 'I-y''�� 't r -.��,-u"�->.. - �'i�a�'--�' DwrterFh�i� �` a is �' K�� her*`3� '` c3 �en bn��-+�'��-» ��ts 's�„r-s•§�- .3` '��3 ; .'y.,. ?f sa. -. . �. per s s3-+. /f••�i`^q?��' *�F"�,-t�is r n- g,i4.2.'ty:'31�'IQPtI �rt s ptalL7Cd11e � Iew Renew6l+� Gilrietlt Lloe}s� xpn�ttpna NO) 1'0 %x 3 �s� � �1x hYi oa fa �Rdln g' . n-6ZV LICe oh?,cr�rtel?tflefit�,ex Based on property conditions and/or validated police nuisance incidents,the above referenced property qualifies for a Type IV Rental License. Before your license application can be considered by the City Council, a Mitigation Plan must be completed and reviewed by City staff. A fully completed Mitigation Plan must be submitted immediately to ensure timely completion of the license application process. The Mitigation Plan should indicate the steps being taken to correct identified violations and the measures that will be taken to ensure ongoing compliance with City Ordinances and applicable Codes. The Mitigation Plan provides an opportunity to review property coixems and identify possible solutions to improve the overall conditions and management of the property. NOTICE: Time is Running Out--You must TAKE ACTION NOW in order t0 meet all the city ordinance and Mitigation Plan requirements within this*pending license period and avoid legal actions. ME Submit the following documents with the Mitigation Plan for approval: 1. Crime Free Housing Program.Training Certificate(if completed,if not completed,please include �p scheduled date in Section C. i v ti 2. Copy of Lease including Minnesota Crime Free Housing Lease Addendum y V/1 3. Submit written report by 101h of each month(after license approval). Phase I r/ 1 1. Use written lease including Crime Free Housing Lease Addendum. 2. Conduct criminal background check for all prospective tenants. Provide documentation to City if �—� requested. r '3. Pursue the eviction of tenants who violate the terms of the lease or any addendums. Page 1 Type IV Mitigation Plan Rev 11-16-11 i � A Q4. Attend City approved eight hour Crime Free Housing course. Date Course Completed: or Date Course Scheduled: _ �C' Phase II Complete Security Assessment and implement all security improvements recommended by the Brooklyn Center Police Department. Date Scheduled: 7i Z Improvements to be completed by: �� �Z Phase III I will attend a minimum of 50%of the ARM meetings(two). I will attend the ARM meetings scheduled for: July 12,2012 & September 13,202 Do these two meeting dates occur before the*Pending Type IV License expiration date?10 Yes No (*See Section A)If no,you will only be able to qualify for a Type IV Rental License upon renewal. 1 I will have no repeat code violations previously documented within the past year. For properties with four or more units. I will conduct resident training annually that includes crime prevention techniques. I will hold regular resident meetings. Based on condition and age,estimated replacement dates are provided for common capital items. Funding should be considered accordingly. However,items broken,worn or otherwise in violation prior to the estimated replacement date will require earlier corrections. Date Last Replaced Estimated Replacement Date Furnace/AC- 1995 2016 Water Heater- 2004 2020 '' Kitchen Appliances- 2005 2030 Laundry Appliances- Supply their own Supply their own Exterior 2006 2016 -Paint/Siding,fascia,trim 2006 2016 -Windows 1996 2020 -Roof 2000 2030 -Fence 2002 2030 -Shed -Garage 1990 2030 -Driveway _ 2000 2030 -Sidewalks Existing 2030 Smoke Alarms&Carbon Monoxide Alarms Other s r 'F-i t v i �.:�. ��•�.���.;_'�o�m r � l'r�na .gint�ltT��?��;.o�►�I�1Q ��o, _s.�s, r�;,.' Implementing the following best practices may assist in the management of your property. By checking the boxes below,you agree to: �✓ 1, Check in with tenants every 30 days. �✓ 2. Drive by property to check for violations twice a month. Page 2 Type IV Mitigation Plan Rev 11-16-11 i I F-1713.J 3. Evict tenants in violation of the lease and all addendums. 4. Provide lawn/snow service. 5. Provide garbage service. ® 6. Install security system. e+ E✓ 7. Provide maintenance service plan for appliances. Name of service co.:Service PLUS 8. I am and will remain current on payment of utility fees,taxes,assessments,fines,penalties and other financial claims due to the City. ® 9. Other(,): Please read thoroughly: If the Type IV Rental License is approved by the City Council,the Licensee must comply with the approved Mitigation Plan and all applicable city codes. No later than the l On'of each calendar month,the licensee must submit to the Building and Community Standards Department a written report describing all steps taken to comply with the Mitigation Plan. I verify that all information provided above is true and accurate. I understand that if I do not comply with an approved Mitigation Plan,comply with all applicable ordinances within the license period,or operate beyond the license expiration date;enforcement actions such as citations,formal complaint or license review may result. Laura Ben Owner or Agent Name and Title(Please Print) 3/9/2012 Owner or Ag nt gnature Date Additional Owner or Agent Name and Title(if applicable)(Please Print) Additional Owner or Agent Signature (if applicable) Date For City Use--Mitieation Plan Approved By: Police Department/Title D to Building 8c Com unity Standards Department/Title Date i Page 3 Type IV Mitigation Plan Rev 11-16-11 City Council Agenda Item No. 10c COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 23, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Vickie Schleuning, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building & Community Standards SUBJECT: Resolution Ordering Corrections of Hazardous and Nuisance Conditions at 6701 Bryant Ave N, Brooklyn Center Recommendation: Staff is recommending the adoption of the subject resolution declaring the accessory structure and the principal structure a hazardous building and life safety hazard, authorizing the City Manager to abate the nuisance. Background: A fire significantly damaged the garage at 6701 Bryant Ave N on November 11, 2011. The property was inspected on November 29, 2011 with a follow up inspection on March 19, 2012. A city-facilitated abatement for the junk.and debris was conducted on March 19, 2012 as part of the vacant building process. However, because of the extensive fire damage the property is a hazard and public nuisance. The structural integrity of the building has been compromised due to extensive fire damage. The wood structural wall panels, roof sheathing and roof system have been significantly damaged where they would not endure the wind load or snow load requirements. The headers, collar ties, roof rafters and ceiling joists have extensive charring that jeopardizes the integrity of the building. The metal fasteners and nails holding the components have decrease holding power. The damage was significant and staff is recommending demolition of the garage and repair of the house. The property was purchased by the current owner on March 15, 2012. Staff have been in contact with the new property owner. A Compliance Notice was sent on March 19, 2012 requesting that the garage be demolished and the house be repaired. A follow up inspection on April 12, 2012 revealed the property has not been brought into compliance and hazards remain. Although the owner applied for a building permit, the permit has not been issued since the fee has not been submitted. The owner has the opportunity to be heard at this meeting if they choose. Therefore, staff recommends the City Council adopt the findings of the City Inspectors regarding the hazardous conditions, and authorize the City Manager to abate the nuisance by razing the structure, removing any remaining junk.and debris, and repairing the damage to the home and property. The foundation of the garage will not be removed, unless there is significant damage found. i Mission:Ensru-inn ma attractive,clear,safe,inclusive connuuritp that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public gust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Budget Issues: The estimated direct cost of razing the garage and repairing the house is $21,000 depending on disposal and material costs. A record of costs associated with enforcement of this order will be kept including administrative time, attorney fees, and all other related costs. The property owners of record will be billed for all associated costs of abatement, and if unpaid,the costs will be specially assessed against the property. Council Goals: Strategic: 3. We will ensure a safe and secure community Attachments: I- Resolution II-Photos II-Notice III- Order �I Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING THE CORRECTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND FURTHER FOR THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCES, SAFETY AND HEALTH HAZARDS WITH RESPECT TO THAT REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 6701 BRYANT AVENUE N BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 8, BLOCK 1, WEST RIVER ESTATES, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND ITS OWNER, LATIN WORK REMODELING CORP., a MINNESOTA DOMESTIC CORPORATION. WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes §463.15 et seq defines a hazardous building or hazardous property as any building or property which because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, physical damage, unsanitary condition or abandonment constitutes a fire hazard or hazard to the public safety or health; and WHEREAS, the correction of hazardous conditions and the abatement of public nuisances is necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public by elimination of dangerous conditions, attractive nuisances and for the elimination of harborage for vermin, rats and other animals who may pose a danger to the public safety and health thereby providing for more sanitary and safe conditions and to further protect the integrity and desirability of neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, §3-103E, 12-1101 and 12-1102 of the Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center provides that any building or portion thereof which is damaged, dilapidated or unsafe or abandoned may be declared to be a hazardous building and further be declared unfit for human habitation and upon such declaration, the owner thereof shall make the property safe and secure immediately so that it is not hazardous to the health, welfare and/or safety of the public and does not constitute a public hazard; and WHEREAS, the fee owner and owner of record of 6701 Bryant Avenue N, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota is Latin Work Remodeling Corp., a Minnesota domestic corporation; and WHEREAS, there is a mortgage of record dated 29 April 2009, recorded 28 May 2009 as Document Number 9365066 in the original principal amount of $68,250 in favor of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems as nominee for Ever Bank, which mortgage may have been assigned to Bank of America; and WHEREAS, there is a mortgage of record dated 9 March 2012, recorded 15 March 2012 as Document Number 9763919 in the original principal amount of$36,000 in favor of Renovo Capital LLC; and —3— i Resolution No. i WHEREAS,the buildings and premises are hazardous by reason of the following: 1. On 29 November 2011, the garage and home of 6701 Bryant Avenue N were extensively damaged by fire. The garage was nearly entirely destroyed and there is significant damage to the dwelling, specifically the roof joists and main support beams, bearing walls, electrical system and plumbing system and exterior walls. Attached are photographs of said damage. The home is not habitable and the home and garage are structurally unsound. WHEREAS,the City has ordered the owner of record, Latin Work Remodeling Corp., to secure the property, clean the debris from the grounds and either raze and remove the dwelling and garage or rebuild according to laws and codes; and WHEREAS,the City has issued an order to Latin Work Remodeling Corp., declaring the property to be a hazardous building within the meaning of Minnesota Statues Chapter 463.15 et seq and City ordinances adopting Chapter 463.15 and requiring demolition of the garage and repair and rebuilding of the garage and home; and WHEREAS, the owner, Latin Work Remodeling, Corp., has not complied with said order; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center adopts the findings of the City staff in the reports and photographs attached hereto and incorporated herein, as to the hazardous nature of the structure and the public nuisances existing thereon; and i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. The City Council finds that the single family home at 6701 Bryant Avenue N Brooklyn Center, Minnesota is a hazardous building because of the extensive damage caused by fire destroying the garage and rendering the dwelling structurally unsound, damaging roof joists, main beams and bearing walls and damaging the electrical and plumbing systems such that the home is not habitable and the premises contain an accumulation of debris and junk and the conditions thereon constitute a public nuisance. 2. The abatement of the public nuisances and hazardous conditions at said premises is hereby ordered by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center as follows: A. Immediate razing and removing the garage within 10 calendar days from the date of service of the Council's Order upon the each owner and within 30 days from the date of service of the Council's Order upon each owner, either razing and removal of said dwelling or satisfactory repair of the dwelling and further removal of all debris therefrom, within 30 days of the date of service of the Council's Order upon each owner. —4— I Resolution No. The City Manager is hereby authorized to cause and carry out the abatement described herein and to perform all other tasks and functions reasonably incident thereto and to keep an accurate record of the cost of all actions and proceedings herein including administrative time attorney's fees, costs and disbursements, and all other costs of the enforcement of this Order; and to send a statement of such costs to the landowners and occupants who are directed herewith to pay the same. Date: April 23, 2012 Mayor ATTEST: City Cleric The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said Resolution was duly passed and adopted. I I —5— Attaclnnent II- Photos oil t; TTt'r� �}e � .. .. RPM v icy 1< t -6- ..1 F, h Ir 03119/2012-08:03 kk ;02JT9 2:012 r r. 3 r� R L r� h �s r t'. t h r S 1 kt t. ' r&. I Via_..- .�_- • , U. s i F t .•. I � � � mil, . c AAN I I Conditions Prior It 13 l��r �?!!a� L�kj��r a9'�faaa}`'.�s •��� �`� � `y �Mt 4 �+'�. � � ,S— F Attachment III- Notice (Mailed and posted on March 19, 2012) cif.y of Brooklyn Center -1,�F7rrtr r,;lily, [rr7.1i1 r1 , March'9.2012 rov XICmNG 7525 CAUF' t'i,l_l lf:r�tl�},jtJ=S02f. 13701 Br,aot Avt N,Biooldyv Center,ft9N Doer Prop tly Ovinor: An irspuction or you propalr v:as corcductr:d flit 0311 CV2.012 anc the vi-3191 ons al the prape•ty pose.hea-th an:l lie sa'e:y h va-ds and mast he corrected prowpl'"y and ar°irda.-1=d in ihis letter,TF=ga-.z.1 F-and no:r--_ I sitanifrcata L:aI11'Jg0 lathe liudu'alfluad baraig.tall•_. The follo'ndrip slave Statute i4pFli.u_in yyox pruputty: 4163.15 DEPINITIDNS Subd.s Hazardous building or hazartlotls proporty. "Hazardous builctino or h�zarclous grope-t "me.ans-n,.htri'•1 ng or prr-.p.=-1y,am.rh bprpt!se of hiadeuuatC Inal titers:•rc=,d lapik221iorj,ptls'c21 dat-n2ge,unsanilary condition,or aharn:Ionrlert,ernsti;.t'e,a ire h_7a-c Cr a nazare to puf:lk.u;rfaly or health ,163.16 REPAIR OR P%t_fal(tJ IIAZAfi€OUS PROPERTY COKDITICrN. The govern-ng body of-any ni.tni•,:ip UI-v may n-r.'Fr the p:7-v-_r ni a r,hazardous aui!diet:of property avi'Ii n the riiu 1, lr5al,tr to er'sic'C'.cir,rO r,love thc+1'azanJ��i.s c'�rciti•a r ,f the huildng n-properly m to raze.c re:rtu';c lf?i t u`Idi�� The rgaired r=naiis',vill req.jau build u:l pd'rinitisy pefn-6i such as the clemoli:-on,p'timbin.1,macha-rccal, 6ICCtric]',and bui drg. Please canaryy: orc.e Cori at 7M-50,D-7121 A t'o s..t up a pic-uOnstr'ucll4n nleetilg jUuc to the condition existing on your pry rwty and the cleterrtinatirrr-that it Is a Hazardous Building you are bring ordered to dernulish the?aragv by iii 2MO12 and toll,it the how5e by 0411912912. If the N opurp not c'cmo t h d and repal'ed by tl•-.,nr -necitioned t tefs't the a v d dor of I ed and repai,-in accordu•a%mlh ilia Fuidel n set forth by hlinrles i.i,Ula.c.s't Lute-chapter 46S- Tne c'r-.I.• hdudrnc ad-n n'5treli!e ch3q=°,','r 11 he the m—npunsibiidy of the prcF[rtj ovarcr,and• unl:laid vfll be.sp=.vial y a-s ssed In!h��prap":ty in accordtincc,e'itl i MS 428 el.cecl and IAS 46:; If;rcu nave questions,please i;onta-t rile at(7613)5C,17-3420 Sincer,:.ly-. J sse Anduf son Hovs-ng oni CorrnlLfft1 Standards Suaervisa' Copy:Fosted upy Maiicd Ito:Latin'eV+a.k Remn_e1rg Gwp, 81;3 t'1r Lai:e St At1,Ihni'i'apsii:,bl'i,55488 "opy P ail-d 1e.'.Latr-r ir%e h KcwedcAng Corp,1325 Pi_rce.Te-NE,Cnhrmhia Heigill:-,Nlx,55421 00 1 5'AW l..Cr r Prrh c' _ Rrf-M.-Tt:ne amt Comnruni(v Cb•ctrrPhone,i T'T271?rru§ir Brr.rA':yr C;r;rh.-11:'rMA43U-2199 (iS3iJ69-3160 i'iirli:zlr:•^iii+h'rr�,t.e'.!ii]9t.i��_•.?3L1/ ,�'rL:•I.rL:.ii�.i!?:',�-131 RLl(763�5tw''9-3:r&r u'r rr•:eif,Rr�ri:rrti;E?}nrr:rfc:ck5 l —10— i Attachment IV—Inspection Report Cite of Brooklyn Center•63ul Shingle Creek Pkwy•BroDlityn Center 55 130 Inspection Report Ti fcllo'r,iag violsations wo a cite;during a resent inspocli,on at tl°c a d icss iiocd t:<_,Iow Hat.�e: The house and 3- arage viii not meet the CUrr-ant ol-i1 iimitat or:s and srcyw lo�ids i�203*7 tatN:tatc t,:ldintg coca etia-v!r-30�..iiubpai 12). The Strll-.tLirai ni:nit4--S on 1 wa t rAw "1"•fiu uarai Lv rdm tlaE VOL'SO h:�d skvnifir:a'it¢i''P r*arr.BVe i c.rrrripr ti's;n_i the.struct,iai ntPy rity d,ie io 1he fallvoincg conditions;cn12-702 i2-70 The.strictural,.vall shoa'.h-ng that is rased for-i-&ill brac hw:has file darn c an:i ri.ia r omprcrnised ;ability`.o prril:erly Lei nwF wall in act:rd:vlci5 vviih'Owlid 1Da1!no The extericrv.'alls-supportincg r'loorrind roof loads on notch sid_a of kuss,lave . .qHf;caw fire darn- atgr:u•dill J)avinq Lill UY/O of the support °;;i,a degree of lip to 2 mohes it decin. Tiip-tear On-,joist that suppol the tnal1 level flocrjo st has daniagca or,040%ai ti o board,'.viih tits tr Line yaa ter irch dupth in charrl!icg p•_-nF+aratiun. he roof.,tructural tnras systEt:�i,s grifical;tl.,r crlmFresr,iisc . r1 - (lii 'ff at'a�is to datrsace on tle trill, t�catkom, �r:�i•,veh card. -he m tail n;encing plates are comprised die to ti,-,r.-Iicat vi.l�-stakc-d rir r:nq the fire lwi•.s daira,o In thi?toof slieakhiricg. The electrlcal system is cotnprowls ci f Chaptr i 12-15L,4) i ISE'taire in Lla1i•-:n has hGen rielt-d throuchotAlha house Al iction boxes are damaged. The i n-3r clog:.1cal rtaas',wi 1he rear of Ill r-1praoe is rt)t supported prc party and nas fir:,da.-ri:-i_�� The p unibing aar, niechnnical sysl_rtis aiL 62-iiagaci 11 'I e gal-- liries a=o riot anrti;:,.red kci',Ile'wall struetUre The coppar piping in tho bas_!nientha;ffi split Get Whn hvaat )r the jo`rts daring the fire. 7h4 oil tra'iddior:er=rnpr 3 wo is rtii5sl.'ig parts anc�,is rot opermle. The water heater is leaktrrg. Thofurnacc ari duet w:.•rt•: h2s�atn*kp avid flrr✓crrnag=arn'av-'ll regL ire.a safety shtick. j The ccaraae(12.707): 3 The rood on the garage has callagsr,d coriplcouli east the debris hat kern rewwed. TI,.c top t•imt%, butioir' plate acrd v ri.cal%%fall studs h.avv been s"gri`Ican'."y c-na,'red b--,yc•r d wp ii i. I he w-,li tiire:i Nng is significintly damaged t'ind will not tricot thu wind load r_q.rirerne-i; Al. tmti-nJ bolts aitd fastvriers n ve been CoOipr.,m sera due to hea a°id roust be ro,'.aced. —11— I i Attachment V- Order ORDER FOR THE CORRECTION AND ABATEMENT OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND FURTHER FOR THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCES, SAFETY AND HEALTH HAZARDS WITH RESPECT TO THAT REAL ESTATE LOCATED AT 6701 BRYANT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430 LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 8, BLOCK ONE, WEST RIVER ESTATES, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA The City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, pursuant to Resolution No. a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, herewith orders Latin Work Remodeling Corp., Ever Bank, Bank of America and Renovo Capital LLC, within 10 calendar days of the service of this Order upon you, to raze and remove the garage attached to said dwelling and all debris therefrom at 6701 Bryant Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota 55430 and further, within 30 calendar days of service of this Order upon you, to either raze and remove dwelling and the foundations and fill all excavations to grade with clean fill and to remove all junk, rubbish and debris from the premises or in the alternative, to repair and rebuild said dwelling according to law. If there is no compliance with this Order, a Motion for summary enforcement of this Order shall be made to the Hennepin County District Court unless an Answer is filed herein within twenty (20) days of the date of service of this Order upon said parties pursuant to Minnesota Statute §463.18. --12-- i If no compliance with this Order shall have taken place or no Answer contesting this action filed herein or if such Answer is filed and the Court orders the enforcement of this Order, then the City of Brooklyn Center shall cause the dwelling and garage , and foundations and junk, rubbish and debris to be removed pursuant to Minnesota Statute §463.21 and City ordinances, with all costs thereof, including attorney's fees and administrative costs, to be a lien against the real estate on which said building was located, said lien to be levied and collected only as a special assessment in the manner provided by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 and the provision of Minnesota Statute §463.161. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Dated: Curt Boganey, City Manager 1 i I AGENDA CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION April 23, 2012 Immediately Following Regular City Council and EDA Meetings Which Start at 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers City Hall A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary. i ACTIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Highway 252 Update PENDING LIST FOR FUTURE WORK SESSIONS Later/Ongoing 1. National League of Cities Service Line Program—May 2012 2. Sister City Update—May 2012 3. Active Living Program 4. Success Target Update 5. Brooklyn Boulevard Study Update I I wvv ®rk Session Agenda Item No. 1 MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE: April 17, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Highway 252 Update Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider providing direction to staff regarding transportation planning for the Highway 252 corridor. Background: At the July 11, 2011, and February 28, 2011, City Council Work Sessions, the City Council was provided with a strategy that could be used to identify and address the multiple transportation issues associated with the Trunk Highway (TH) 252 corridor (see attached memorandums). The next steps that were identified would be to designate funding and issue a Request for Proposals from consultants to perform the Phase 1 feasibility study (see February 22, 2011, memo for further details of the multiple-phased planning and implementation process). At its meeting on July 11, 2011, the City Council indicated that pursuit of TH 252 planning would be revisited on an annual basis in consideration of staff workload, funding, partnering opportunities, etc. to determine if the Council desired to proceed with the study. On December 14, 2011, City staff met with Mn/DOT to discuss their newly programmed 2013 project for the 66th Avenue/TH 252 intersection that included replacing the existing traffic signal system and removing the eastbound to southbound free-right lane that would only partially address a safety issue experienced on TH 252. However, due to concerns City staff had with the safety issues that might simply be shifted from the mainline of TH 252 onto the City side street at that location(66th Avenue), Mn/DOT agreed that it would be better to put their project on hold with the anticipation of working with the City to obtain a better overall strategy and plan for that intersection and the corridor. Recently, Mn/DOT provided the City with statistics that shows crash rates through the TH 252 corridor (see attached crash rate figure). Most significant is the 66th Avenue/TH 252 intersection crash rate that ranks third highest statewide on Mn/DOT roadways. Mn/DOT understands the significance of the issues along this corridor, specifically at the 66th Avenue/TH 252 intersection, and has indicated that they agree it makes sense to proceed with the City's recommended feasibility study to obtain a better short- and long-term plan for this intersection and corridor. With the identified significance of the safety issues along this corridor, proceeding with the suggested Phase 1 feasibility study would seemingly be better to pursue currently rather than later. City staff is prepared to spearhead this study if directed at this time. The estimated $60,000 needed to fund this study has not yet been designated but options are available if directed to proceed. Alission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive eon nutnio,that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION Policy Issues: Does the City desire to pursue Phase 1 planning? Council Goals: Strategic: 7. We will continue to maintain the city's infrastructure improvements Ongoing: 4. We will ensure the city's influence at the legislature Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive coanmunity that enhances the quality oj'li/e for all people and preserves the public trust MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE: July 5, 2011 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Steve Lillehaug,Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Highway 252 Update Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider providing direction to staff regarding transportation planning for the Highway 252 corridor. Background: At the February 28, 2011, City Council Work Session, the City Council was provided with information and a possible strategy that could be used to identify and address the multiple transportation issues associated with the Trunk Highway 252 corridor (see the attached February 22, 2011 memo). At that meeting, current staff work load and the uncertainty of the City's budget at the time were discussed, and staff was directed to report back to the Council in June 2011 with additional information including interest by Brooklyn Park and Mn/DOT in partnering opportunities and City funding options for a study. As previously indicated, the first recommended step (Phase 1) is to perform a feasibility study that would help identify the issues within the corridor, develop conceptual solutions, and identify funding and implementation strategies. The cost of this level of study would be approximately $60,000. Further consideration in advancing a Phase 1 study should include the following elements: • Partnering with Brooklyn Park—Brooklyn Park has indicated that they are not interested in contributing funding towards a study at this time. • Partnering with Mn/DOT — Mn/DOT is not interested in contributing funds towards a study at this time; however, it is anticipated that Mn/DOT would be a participant on the technical end if we pursued a study. • Workload — City staff workload with the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor study over the next year will be increased. Performing these two studies at the same time would be tasking. • Funding—City funding for a study could be made available from the General Fund fund balance or potentially from TIF 2. The next step in advancing the Phase 1 planning, if desired, would be to keynote funding and issue a Request for Proposals from consultants to perform the study. Policy Issues: Does the City Council desire to pursue Phase 1 planning? Council Goals: Strategic: 5. We will continue to maintain and upgrade City infrastructure improvements Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE: February 22, 2011 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Steve Lillehaug,Director of Public Works/City Engineer t SUBJECT: Highway 252 Update Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider providing direction to staff regarding transportation planning for the Highway 252 corridor. Background: Highway 252 is a roadway corridor that has been identified with longstanding local and regional transportation issues ranging from poor intersection operations with long delays, to pedestrian safety issues, to an identified high vehicle accident area. Highway 252 through Brooklyn Center falls under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT).Mn/DOT, along with the Cities of Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park, have been studying the issues and potential solutions over the years but have not jointly identified an acceptable plan to address these issues.Until recently, Mn/DOT was planning for Highway 252 to be an expansion corridor (e.g. freeway). However,new funding strategies and priorities identified in the new Metropolitan Council and Mn/DOT 2010 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) eliminated the planning and funding for the expansion of Highway 252 through the cities of Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park, other than the addition of a northbound lane on either side of 81St Avenue in Brooklyn Park. Although major improvements to Highway 252 are not included in the TPP, the issues remain. On October 11, 2010, the City Council discussed developing an action plan that would identify and shape the potential planning process for the Highway 252 corridor. The plan must take into consideration both regional and local transportation issues. The following provides a recommended strategy that lays out the different elements to indentify and address the multiple transportation issues, both short-term and long-term, surrounding the Highway 252 corridor within the City of Brooklyn Center and potentially through the entire Highway 252 corridor from I-694 to TH 610. Phase 1—FeasibiliU Stydy The Phase 1 study would focus on collectively identifying all local and regional transportation issues, existing and future conditions, developing interim and ultimate concepts, coordination with Mn/DOT and other partners (e.g. Brooklyn Park), identifying funding strategies, and identifying an implementation strategy. The timeline for this study would consist of approximately four months and is estimated to cost approximately$60,000. Phase 2—Implement Interim Solutions Phase 2 would consist of implementation of interim improvements. Interim improvements would include smaller improvements such as turn lane and/or signal revisions, geometric modifications, addition of a bridge, or other isolated projects with independent utility,yet accommodating to the Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust i MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION ultimate solution where appropriate. Funding for interim projects could be provided by pursuing such programs as the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), Surface Transportation Program (STP), future special grants such as the Safety and Mobility (SAM) interchange program, or local programs including Municipal Agreements or advancement of Municipal State Aid. Each project would require appropriate environmental documentation, staff approved layout, permitting, identification of funding sources and other documentation as required. Timeline requirements for the development of each project could range from six months to a few years, depending on funding requirements, right-of-way impacts and project development. Interim projects could occur anytime over the next 20 years and beyond, depending on available funding sources. Assuming an interim project associated with each of the six at-grade intersections along the Highway 252 corridor, a rough estimation of $1.1M per intersection improvement with planning/engineering would total approximately $6.6M. If significant interim improvements were identified that would include a bridge or other major improvement, costs would be considerably more. Phase 3— Ultimate Plan Phase 3 would involve the ultimate solution as would be defined by the feasibility study. Phase 3 improvements would likely require an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an approved Environmental Impact Study (EIS) documenting the various impacts, a staff-approved geometric layout, right-of-way planning and mapping, land use study, traffic study and the development of preliminary plans. The planning for a holistic corridor study would be $1M or more. Phase 3 improvements could be implemented incrementally as well. The timing to complete the Phase 3 planning could take upwards of two or more years to complete, with actual construction dependent on funding and the many other factors that could result in more than 20 years and beyond until final implementation. Both Mn/DOT and the City of Brooklyn Park have been approached to discuss partnering opportunities and both have indicated a willingness to work with the City of Brooklyn Center, dependent on the scope and benefit to each entity. Policy Issues: Does the City Council desire to pursue Phase 1,Phase 2 and/or Phase 3 planning? Council Goals: Strategic: 2. We will aggressively proceed with implementation of City's redevelopment plans 5. We will continue to maintain and upgrade City infrastructure improvements Afission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe community that entrances the quality of life and preserves the public trust • TH 252 1-694 to TH 610 .o _61aiN•� ,lif �{4nf *There �i`0� COON ip1df ♦� are no detectors at this location to calculate hours of congestion. PI fY !?? cFd N.y •Interchanges are ranked statewide N.w 18230 total interchanges). Plyln uth 1 -2 000-2009 Fatal(K)and Incapacitating Injury(A)Crashesi 66th Ave 70th Ave 73rd Ave 2007 Data 2006 Data 2006 Data 194/1694 ' 1 c 694 ramp 1 1 311/257 1� 103 147 ---- 137/46 s�� ---- F 1 14� ----------- --- - - - - F ---------I ® � L«�--- 3180/1501 __ '----------------------------I L� 3401/1;52 ---------------------------------------1 1� 3858/1500---------------------- ---------------------- E' -------------1 „ L'�--- ------------- i 21 Crashes r� - --------------------------------------) „ 1�-- Lr----- 1/6 , 2007-2009 1 25 Crashes lr --- 19/24___________ _ 61 Crashes I 14 Crashes 2007-2009 •---_-- �� 71 Crashes 1 .T I I S Crashes ,,� 2007-2009 5 C -147/2148 11 2007-2009 r� 1007-1009 ---- 34/170 -- I Ns78 KA Cost 1 2007-2009 - 1 200 Rank($138,333). 15/110 �1 I 11579 KA Cost Rank �'--------------------------- -- #10 KA Cost Rank I I#196 IntersectionF---- ---~-1 1--------------------------------- •� �, 1076/3464 '--I E----------------------------------------------- ----- ($138,333) ($553,333) L_______________________________________________ ' 1210/3649--=1 Cost Rank L____--------------------'---------- 924/336_ _ ■�► I#1691nterso nCrash l__-----'-'----------------------- �.� #3 Intersection Cost 1 1_($501,667) 1 fffy 1 Cost Rank Rink($2,082,333L 1 694 ramp ��f+ 3/c1 _L$517,1.331 • V 1 � 1 y 1 v — 1 Reference Point: 000+00.607 001+00.143 001+00.478 #553 Section KA Crash Cos[Rank($0) 11103 Section Crash Cost Rank($517,134) f 77th Ave/Brookdale Dr. 2006 Data - Humbolt/81st Ave � ,• ��� 2008 Data asth Ave I 1 1 1 2008 Data 1 1 1 1 1 I t • 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 E- 588/457 �i , �+ ,� «— 12/24 20/13 / li —L'� � _245/16Z_ ♦� 494/2aJ- Imo ' "'� ��151/305___ 2i n117 ---__. „ .______ T 1 1 1 '------ ----� 1'------ 1988/1411 -----,-------------------------------------a 1 --- 2834/1601 ----------------------------------- -----------------� 1------- 2208/1355-- E -------------- I ~�-------- ~� ~ 4� I ~� 1-------------- 1------------- F 1 IJ z/5 I „ Ir— 4/24 1 IJt— 6s/11z 1 29 Crashes 5 Crashes 41 Crashes S Crashes 1 .� 2007-2009 2007-2009 ( 35 Crashes 1 4 C 39/415 =�i 1 "" 2007-2009 1 2007-2009 - 248/313�14 2007-2009 ( 200 #580 KA Cost Rank 1 ---------13/23__�t� 1131 KA Cost Rank _ " ______ � 11581 KA Cost Rank 1 4'----------------' _, 1 ($138,333) 1 _-—,______-_--- __- ---_-__ 2 _, 1 ($415,000) ( �� u, ff�►I 1120/25S3 ►� --------------- 1181/_628 -- ---------- - -- ($138,333) • --- #651ntersec[ionCrashCost -- �� �y� #9 Intersection Crash CostRank (-------------'---��----------- 12a0/2653� L----------- - ------------ „• ------------ 1 ,,, ______-___ #36 Intersection 4 �►1 Rank($782,000) r 13/1 ,, /21 �i ($1,376,000) 19/8 -►� Crash Cost Rank 1------------ ?l/8jB _;� _ i�i�� �1�_� - 49/45 �1 _ ($950'000) T_J 107/35, ;\ 26 Cre 2007-