Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 04-26 PCP7 - r ty u/ KLYN TER PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER APRIL 26, 2012 STUDY SESSION 1. Call to Order: 7:00 PM 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes—April 12, 2012 Regular Meeting 4. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 5. Presentations a) Shingle Creek/West Mississippi Watershed District Third Generation Plan—presentation by Wenck Engineers & Scientists Joint Meeting of the City's Citizen Advisory Committees - Park and Recreation Commission and City Planning Commission 6. Planning Application Items with Public Hearing a) Loren Van Der Slik/Gatlin Development Planning App. No. 2012-006 Consideration of a proposed Preliminary Plat of Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition and Site and Building plan approval related to the former Brookdale Mall Food Court building, now part of the new Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, located at 1300 Shingle Creek Crossing. [item is scheduled to be TABLED and continued to the May 17, 2012 meeting] 7. Planning Application Items (without public hearing) a) Paul Hyde(Real Estate Recycling) Planning App. No. 2012-002 Consideration of a proposed Development/Site and Building Plan for a new 90,000 sq. ft. office/manufacturing/warehouse facility, in conjunction with the new France Avenue Business Center 4 - Planned Unit Development, to be located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North. 7. Other Business 8. Adjournment MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION APRIL 12, 2012 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Rahn at 7:01 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Sean Rahn, Commissioners Scott Burfeind, Kara Kuykendall, and Michael Parks were present. Also present Councilmember Carol Kleven, were Secretary to the Planning Commission Tim Benetti, Director of Business & Development, Gary Eitel, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Stan Leino, Carlos Morgan and Stephen Schonning were absent and excused. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —MARCH 29, 2012 There was a motion by Commissioner Parks , seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to approve the minutes of the March 29, 2012 meeting as submitted. The motion passed unanimously. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Rahn explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. APPLICATION NO. 2012-002 PAUL HYDE (REAL ESTATE RECYCLING) Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-002, a request for PUD/Rezoning from C-2 (Commerce) to PUD-MIXED C-2/I-1 (Commerce/Industrial Park), along with a proposed concept development plan for a new 90,000 sq. ft. office/manufacturing/warehouse facility located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North. Mr. Benetti presented the staff report describing the location of the property and the proposal. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 4- 12-12 for Application No. 2012-002.) Mr. Benetti explained that prior to the request for rezoning, the City's 2010 Comprehensive Plan was amended to allow a Mixed Use/OS/I (Office-Service, Business/Industrial) land use category that adds an industrial element to the underlying land use allowing the manufacturing and warehouse components for this new development. He added that the subject site currently consists of 8.67 acres of vacant land, formerly a Lifetime Fitness facility and a Denny's Restaurant. Mr. Benetti stated that during preliminary testing and soil investigations of the subject site, RER discovered some potential volatile organic compounds and petroleum compounds which may require soil clean up and remediation work. He added that a $50,000 grant was received from DEED in December 2011 to assist with the investigation and clean up and Mr. Hyde is soliciting other grants for additional required clean up. Mr. Benetti stated that a replatting of the property will be considered by the Commission at a future meeting and this application is for PUD and conceptual site plan approval only. Mr. Benetti reminded the Commission that a land use amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan was previously approved by the Metropolitan Council to allow the rezoning for this redevelopment to take place. PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-002 There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2012-002, 7:12 at p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. Mr. Paul Hyde, Real Estate Recycling, introduced himself to the Commission. Commissioner Parks asked Mr. Hyde if this rezoning will give them the best opportunity for a successful redevelopment of this site. He further stated that he'd like the applicant to `emphasis' the building since this location is a gateway to the city. Mr. Hyde stated that they have examined several site plan layouts for this site and have attempted to display the most attractive part of the building along Hwy 100 with no traffic on Azelia Avenue. Chair Rahn asked about the status of clean up on the site. Mr. Hyde responded that he has completed three superfund site projects, more than anybody in the country. He added they have applied for additional funds to help remediate the site since the discovery of extensive PAH compounds, probably left behind from highway projects, were found on the site. He added they plan to start clean-up work by July 1, 2012 and anticipate starting construction a few weeks later to deliver the building on a clean site the first part of December. Mr. Paul Keicker, 4701 Azelia Avenue, asked about any studies done on the extension of the bike trail since it will be located directly next to his property. He stated that he bought his home since it is a quiet location and the addition of the trails will add foot traffic close to his property. He also asked about the retaining wall, status of existing trees and the impact of the pond that will be 200 ft. from his property. Chair Rahn responded that this is a conceptual plan and some of those issues will be addressed during final site plan review and approval. Mr. Benetti explained that the goal is to take the Twin Lake Regional Trail where it dead ends at the park and bring it to Lakeside Avenue connecting at the SW corner of the site along the back end to the east side of Azelia Avenue. He added that they have not finalized how this will all work together but the city is working with Three Rivers Park District and Metropolitan Council on the design of the trail connection. He further added that this is slated for 2015 construction and is part of a regional trail funded with federal dollars. 4-12-12 Page 2 Chair Rahn added that the trail will be an amenity to the area once the trail and landscaping is complete. Mr. Hyde responded to Mr. Keicker's questions by stating that they are putting up a cedar fence along the residential area along with a significant change in grade to provide adequate screening from the residential area. He added that the pond will have rain water that runs off the roof to allow sediment to be treated before it runs into the watershed. No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on Application No. 2012-002. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Parks , seconded by Commissioner Burfeind, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2012-002, at 7:24 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-04 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-002 SUBMITTED BY PAUL HYDE OF REAL ESTATE RECYCLING, LLC, FOR THE REZONING OF LAND LOCATED AT 4001 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE NORTH FROM C2 (COMMERCE) TO PUD-MIXED C2/I-1 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-MIXED COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK) There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-04. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, and Parks And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Planning Commission will consider the development plan/site and building plan for this proposed PUD at their April 26, 2012 meeting. The Council will initially consider the rezoning element of this application at its April 23, 2012 meeting, whereby Council will receive this favorable recommendation and asked to set a public hearing at the May 14, 2012 Council meeting. At this meeting, the Council will give final consideration this proposed Planned Unit Development, which shall include the rezoning and the final development/site plan of the subject site. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. 4-12-12 Page 3 APPLICATION NO. 2012-004 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-004, a proposed amendment to the City of Brooklyn Center's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update by changing an "PS-Public and Semi- Public" land use designation to "MF-Multi-Family (High Density)" for the property located at 5401 — 69th Avenuenue North (Maranatha Homes Care Center property). (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 4-12-12 for Application No. 2012-004.) Mr. Benetti explained that the requested change will help facilitate a separate request for rezoning of the Maranatha site. He added that if the Planning Commission and City Council accepts the recommendation, Staff will submit an application to the Metropolitan Council as required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act for an amendment to the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Parks asked about the status of the Metropolitan Council review. Mr. Benetti explained that this application must be reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council prior to being sent to the Metropolitan Council for review. PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-004 There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Burfeind, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2012-004, at 7:36 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. Mr. John Mehrkens with Maranatha Presbyterian Homes introduced himself to the Commission. There were no questions for Mr. Mehrkens regarding the Land Use Amendment application. Mr. Braden Barnhart, 6813 Toledo Avenue N, said he spent the week examining the city's zoning map. He says there is no other place in the city where R-6 zoning abuts single family homes and this use is just not compatible. He asked the Commission to not approve R-5 zoning because it is just not compatible with surrounding uses. Mr. Arvid Sorenson, 6901 Toledo Avenue N, stated he was here when Maranatha was built and it was indicated at the time that they would not rezone the R-1 zoning district. He added that the building setback would only be 60 ft. from the residential properties and for that reason he is opposed to the rezoning. Mr. Richard Snow, 5312 68`h Avenue N, stated his concern is if the rezoning goes through and a five story building is built, it would make it hard to sell his house with the building so close to his property line. He added that he feels there will be a noise factor along a currently quiet street especially when construction takes place and he does not want to see a huge building on the site. Mr. Randy Christiansen, 7001 Regent Avenue N, stated his parents live right next to the property in question and he doesn't feel we should change this from a public land use to R-6 zoning. 4-12-12 Page 4 Mr. Tom Scuhltz, 6831 Toledo Avenue N, stated he wants feedback regarding how it is determined that this will increase property values and quality of life. He wants to know the basis of that comment. Mr. Benetti replied that in the city's opinion, this development will replace a functionally obsolete nursing facility and replace it with a new facility for the nursing home residents which will increase their quality of life. He added that has been shown that new construction provides a positive improvement to an area and will provide an improved quality of life for the nursing home residents. Mr. Schultz further stated his property abuts the service entry area and he doesn't feel they are a good neighbor since he experiences a lot of noise and disruption and feels that this project is self- serving only to Maranatha. Mr. Braden Barnhart, 6813 Toledo Avenue N, stated that they should look at other businesses around the area which are all one or two story buildings. He feels allowing a similar building on the site is a better idea that a multi-story building. Ms. Desiree Wilkerson, 5318 68th Avenue N, asked if the residents all disagree, can the Commission still approve the application. She feels like it is already approved. Chair Rahn stated that they are an advisory body and following comments from the public they will make a decision regarding a recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Randy Christianson, further asked if the Commission had any questions for the residents. He stated that his parents live on 6803 Toledo Avenue N. Commissioner Parks asked if Mr. Christianson could further clarify their concerns, since it doesn't directly his property. He asked if it is the height of the building he is concerned with or the development itself. Mr. Randy Christianson replied that his father's property is the least affected but based on the current plan, he knows that the plan can change and they will little say if those changes occur. Mr. Randy Christianson replied to the Commissioner's question to say this directly affects their quality of life and they value their neighborhood. They want a solution that doesn't change the use of their home. They like Maranatha as a neighbor but are opposed to a five story building next to their homes. Mr. Benetti explained the application being reviewed with this application is the Land Use element with underlying rezoning. The Commission is reminded of the need to separate the request for an amendment to the Land Use from the rezoning. He added that the rezoning and site plan applications are coming later. Mr. Arvid Sorenson, 6901 Toledo Avenue N, stated changing the comprehensive plan does affect the rezoning of the property. Ms. Desiree Wilkerson, 5318 68th Avenue N, asked what is in it for Brooklyn Center if this development proceeds? She asked if it is only money. 4-12-12 Page 5 Chair Rahn replied new construction and a better quality of life for the residents of the nursing home is a benefit for everyone. Ms. Wilkerson further stated that these residents have lived there longer than the residents of the nursing home live there and that should be taken into consideration since they do not usually stay at a nursing home as long as someone occupies their home. Commissioner Parks stated that as people get older they like to stay in their homes. However, statistics show there is an aging population of seniors that require alternative life styles. This development offers another housing alternative to residents as they get older which may influence whether or not they stay in the community. He further stated that they appreciate everyone coming out and expressing their concerns and hopes they will come out again if the Commission looks at another comprehensive plan amendment. Mr. Randy Christianson, 7001 Regent Avenue N, asked what is allowed in the current site with R-1 zoning. Mr. Benetti replied R-1 zoning allows only single family homes. Mr. Christianson asked if Maranatha would like help from the residents to request the state to allow them to rebuild a new single level facility on the site and lift the moratorium. He stated they aren't opposed to a redevelopment but do not feel that a four story building will enhance the neighborhood and would like to work with Maranatha to see that happen. No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on Application No. 2012-004. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2012-004, at 8:06 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. Commissioners Parks stated that he would like to emphasis that this application is about the land use only, not the site plan. Chair Rahn further explained that the property was previously zoned R-1 and later contained a nursing home facility with a senior apartment facility added later. He added both uses have a dense population compared to single family homes. Commissioners Parks reviewed the staff recommended findings. Mr. Benetti emphasized that this application is contingent on the Met Council review after City Council review. Mr. Eitel further explained the different density designations allowed within each zoning district in the City. 4-12-12 Page 6 RECOMMEND ACTION TO TABLE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012- 05 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-004, AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FROM "PS-PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC" TO "MF-MULTI-FAMILY (HIGH DENSITY RELATIVE TO THE RI ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONED LAND GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE CITY, ADDRESSED AS 5401 —690h AVENUENUE NORTH There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to table Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-05. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, and Parks And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. APPLICATION NO. 2012-003 MARANATHA CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST HOME, INC. Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-003, a request for rezoning of property located at 5401-5415 691h Avenuenue North, from R6 Multiple Family Residence and R1 One Family Residence to new PUD-MIXED R5/R6 (Multiple Family Residence), along with a proposed site and building development plan for a new four story, 97 bed nursing care center (Phase I) and a future development plan (Phase II) of a 29-38 unit senior independent living facility. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 4-12-12 for Application No. 2012-003) Mr. Benetti explained the Maranatha campus consists of two separate lots. The nursing home parcel (addressed as 5401 — 69th Avenue.) is 3.78 acres in size and is situated in the R1 district. The existing 64-unit senior assisted living facility (5415 —69th Avenue.) is 3.28 acres in size and situated in the R6 district. The combined area of the sites is 7.06 acres. Mr. Benetti further explained that the nursing home facility was built in 1959, expanded in 1994 and was approved as a special use under the R1 district regulations at that time. The senior assisted living apartments were created in 1987 by the filing of a new plat (Maranatha Addition) and rezoning from R1 (One Family) to R6 (Multiple Family Residence) and the 65 unit apartment was completed in 1988. Mr. Benetti stated that the new PUD will allow Maranatha to continue to operate a nursing care facility on the site with the existing special use to remain in place. When the nursing care addition is complete, Maranatha will proceed to Phase II of this redevelopment project (adding 29-38 new senior assisted/independent living units) and demolition of the existing nursing home center once the new 97-bed unit facility is constructed. Mr. Benetti added that replatting of the property will be considered in the near future as a condition to this action as part of the PUD agreement between PHS and the City. Mr. Benetti stated that staff is recommending that the Commission approve the rezoning and table the site plan until some of the site issues are worked out more in detail, specifically 4-12-12 Page 7 regarding Phase II of the development. Commissioner Burfeind asked for further clarification from staff regarding the approval process of this application. Me. Benetti explained PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-003 There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Burfeind, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2012-003, at 8:40 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. Mr. John Mehrkens, with Maranatha Presbyterian Homes, stated that he wants to acknowledge comments from the neighbors and indicate that they want to be good neighbors regarding this site. He added that they are attempting to meet the needs of their residents as best they can and also want to keep the neighbors happy. Mr. Mehrkens reviewed the site layout and explained that their challenge with the site is for the current residents to continue to be served while they construct the new facility and later tear down the existing facility. He further explained that a multi-story building is the desirable way to care for residents since the living space of a resident has increased to provide the necessary services for the residents to take advantage of. He added that you don't ever see one-story care centers built anymore, but they are constructed with more of a neighborhood type setting rather than a clinical setting that provides a variety of services and activities depending on a resident's needs. This generally requires more space and the need for the multi-story building. He also stated he appreciates the offer to help get the state to lift the moratorium, however, they have been trying to do that for 20 years and the possibility of that is very remote. Mr. Mehrkens also addressed Phase II of the development and added this involves the opportunity to serve Brooklyn Center residents with the development of additional living units in a possible 2-4 story building and will serve seniors in the future. Chair Rahn stated that the site and building plan will be looked at during the May 17 Planning Commission meeting and tonight's' review is for the rezoning only. Mr. Braden Barnhart, 6813 Toledo Avenue N, stated that they see a zone cut in half which indicates a breach of trust with the residents by locating the building so close to the property line and with the change in rezoning. He feels that this whole process is rubber stamped and they could do a better job of design by building a facility that does not negatively affect the neighborhood. He is asking the Commission to not approve the applications. He doesn't want a neighbor that can look out their windows and see into his backyard. He feels that with the proposed height of the building he will not have sunlight in his backyard. He asked the Commission what they truly value, is it good neighborhoods or tax dollars? He further stated that if this project moves forward, all the surrounding property owners will sell their houses or convert them into rental property. Mr. Arvid Sorenson, 6901 Toledo Avenue N, stated his house faces 69th Avenue N and is directly across from the parking lot to Maranatha. He says that the sun does set low for a few 4-12-12 Page 8 months and what concerns him is the north parking lot. He moved in 40 years ago after the nursing home was there and when MnDOT rebuilt the Zane Avenue bridge and closed off access to Hwy 94, traffic from Brooklyn Boulevard increased greatly down 69th Avenue N. He added that traffic on 69th Avenue N has become dangerous with cars turning into Maranatha with the location of the driveway. He feels that the new plan is going to make it worse and he feels that they should close the 691h Avenue driveway and make a main entrance off Unity Avenue N. Mr. Ray Christianson, 6803 Toledo Avenue stated that he doesn't feel the zoning should be changed if it is unknown what the actual plan is. Commissioner Kuykendall stated that this is not rubber stamped and things get changed following the public input at a public hearing. She cited the example of the Paul Hyde development at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue N. She further added that comments from the public are taken into consideration before a recommendation is taken to the City Council. Mr. Tom Schultz, 6831 Toledo Avenue N, asked if parking calculations were considered for Phase II of the project. Mr. Benetti replied that Phase II accounts for underground parking and he added that most residents of these facilities do not drive. Mr. Schultz added that he notices that the residents get a good view from their windows and hopes that the homeowners also would get the same view. He also asked how many Brooklyn Center residents live in the facility. Mr. Mehrkens responded that 85% of its residents formerly lived within five miles of their facilities. Mr. Randy Christiansen, 7001 Regent Avenue N, asked if the resolution would be signed tonight? He also asked the Commission to table the rezoning until there is a plan for Phase II. He asked the Commission if they had heard him and were willing to vote no on the application. Mr. Benetti explained that the only way this site works for Maranatha is to keep the 64 unit facility unit a legal conforming facility under the R-6 zoning. He explained under R-5 zoning, they are allowed the development of the nursing home facility and keep the senior apartments. This also allows for the future development of a senior housing element that has not been determined at this point. He further explained there have been other cases where rezonings have taken place without a specific plan for the site. He stated under this PUD the applicant is being granted the flexibility to develop the site even if it is at a future time and at that time, the PUD may need to be amended for the specific use. He explained that there is level of trust between an applicant and the city which provides them with the options on the table for future development. Mr. Randy Christianson once again asked the Commission to not approve the rezoning and leave it at R-1 zoning. He feels there are holes in the plan and wants to see them filled in. Mr. Mehrkens stated he wanted the record to show that they always work with neighbors on site plan development. He added what's pressing from the moratorium is rebuilding the nursing home care center and for the future they are more than happy to have a dialog with the neighbors about what is best for the site layout to best meet the needs of their residents and the surrounding residents. He also addressed the breach of trust comment pointing out that the comment made 4-12-12 Page 9 was directed at the former owner of the site. He added that they are hoping to bring a state of the art facility to replace a very tired facility to better meet the needs of their residents and they did not want to present a transparent plan with all green space and instead provided a footprint about a conceptual down the road plan for Phase II. Commissioner Kuykendall stated that she would hope for trust from the residents and everything that was said will be considered in the site plan review. No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on Application No. 2012-003. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2012-003, at 9:34 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. There was further discussion among staff and the Commission regarding Application No. 2012- 004 and 2012-003. Mr. Benetti suggested that the Maranatha applications could be tabled and come back to the Commission on May 17, 2012 with alterations to the plan that could address the neighbor's concerns, parking issues and a more precise plan for future development. The applicant responded that he would consent to a postponement in order to address the neighbor's concerns and come up with a plan that still meets their density needs, green space, parking, etc. as well as zoning requirements. Chair Rahn responded that they would like to see this development take place while meeting the needs of their residents and the neighbors and he applauds the applicant's efforts to do so. Commissioner Kuykendall stated that she would like to see this plan move forward tonight with a better look at the site plan. Mr. Benetti responded that it would also be acceptable to move forward tonight with the zoning and land use approvals while the applicant continues to work with the neighbors to develop an amicable site plan that allows the applicant to stay on schedule with the moratorium requirements as well their construction plans. Mr. Mehrkens stated that they would like to meet with the neighbors to have them as their advocates when the applications are presented to the City Council. This would allow the City Council to review this as a package at one meeting. Commissioner Parks stated that he doesn't have a problem with the proposed change in Land Use. Chair Rahn explained that if they do not approve this as a package, the Council will have a repeat discussion with the residents such as tonight. Mr. Benetti explained that if the 4-12-12 Page 10 Commission recommends for approval the proposed Land Use change, they could move forward with that application so it can get forwarded to the Met Council and rezoning does not take place until the Land Use change takes place first. Commissioner Burfeind stated that he also has some concerns with the site plan layout. He is not comfortable with moving forward with the land use change and zoning change until the site plan is more defined. He would like to see the site plan being approved as part of the package for approval. Commissioner Parks stated is in agreement with the other Commission members. RECOMMEND ACTION TO TABLE APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-06 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-003 SUBMITTED BY MARANATHA CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST HOME, INC., TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5401- 5415 — 69TH AVENUE NORTH FROM R1 ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND RI-MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO A NEW PUD-MIXED R5/R6 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-MIXED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE) DISTRICT There was a motion by Commissioner Burfeind, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to table Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-06. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, and Parks And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. APPLICATION NO. 2012-005 - BORDER FOODS (TACO BELL) Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-005, a request for a variance to allow three (3) driveways to be closer than the 50-foot minimum separation requirement for business district properties, along with a site and building plan of a new 2,642 sq. ft. Taco Bell restaurant, located at 5532 Brooklyn Boulevard. He added that the applicant is seeking variance approval due to site constraints and the desire to serve their customers safely and more effectively at their drive- thru service. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 4-12-12 for Application No. 2012-005) Mr. Benetti stated that after studying this area it appears setbacks were limited or allowed to reduce to a minimum of 10-feet along this private roadway and the roadway was never considered or recognized as either the front or rear yard for setback purposes. He added that required setbacks for the C2 district are 35-ft. front; 40-ft. rear; and 10-ft. side yard. The new Taco Bell building is shown with a 47.4 foot setback from Brooklyn Boulevard, a 29.6-ft. setback off Brooklyn Boulevard Lane; and a 15-ft. setback from the south side lot line. The setbacks for the existing building are 81-feet; 15 feet; and 52.2 feet, respectively. He further explained that this area is somewhat unique to the City and this commercial area with respect to the private roadway that serves these commercial businesses. The new restaurant will be served by a larger drive-thru aisle, with a maximum stacking of up to 11 vehicles. The 4-12-12 Page 11 existing drive-thru lane is impacted by the central layout of the building and the location of customer parking spaces. This new drive-thru layout directs drive thru customers to the outer parts of the site, with separated driveways and access points out onto Brooklyn Boulevard Lane. He added that by approving the variance, it allows better stacking of vehicles and creates a better, safer layout on the site. Commissioner Parks asked about the private roadway. Mr. Benetti responded that it is a private roadway, one of only two in the city that serves as a public roadway giving access to the businesses in the area. He added City records indicate that historically the driveways in this area spilling out to the private roadway did not need to meet the 50 ft. setback which is normally required. PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-005 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2012-005, at 10:15 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. Barbara Schneider, Border Foods, stated that she reviewed the notes from the City Engineer and she would like to have further dialogue with the City Engineer to resolve his concerns. She further pointed out the location of the rear service door and traffic flow as addressed in the Engineer's comments. Dean Mattson, Architect, described the materials to be used on the new building. Councilmember Kleven asked if the building would have an automatic door opener. Ms. Schneider responded that she would look into it since there are no plans for one. No other persons from the public appeared before the Commission during the public hearing on Application No. 2012-005. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Burfeind, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2012-005, at 10:26 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-07 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-005 SUBMITTED BY BORDER FOODS, INC. FOR THE APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO CITY CODE SECTION 35-703 AND SITE AND 4-12-12 Page 12 BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL OF A NEW TACO BELL RESTAURANT, LOCATED AT 5532 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD LANE. There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Burfeind, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-07. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, and Parks. And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its April 23, 2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. DISCUSSION ITEM There were no discussion items. OTHER BUSINESS Tim stated that on April 26th Wenck, will be making a presentation to the Planning Commission and Park & Recreation Commission regarding the Third Generation CAC to provide an overview of what to expect from the plan. He encouraged the Commission to attend. There was no other business. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 10:28 p.m. Chair Recorded and transcribed by: Rebecca Crass 4-12-12 Page 13 City of Business and Development Broo,H n Center Department www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway,Brooklyn Center,Minnesota 55430-2199 Phone 763.569.3300 TTYNoice 711 Fax 763.569.3494 MEMORANDUM TO: Chair Sean Rahn and Planning Commissioners FROM: Gary Eitel, Business & Development Director Tim Benetti, Planning & Zoning Specialist CC: Steve Lillehaug, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: April 20, 2012 RE: 3`d Generation Plan- Watershed Management Planning April 26, 2012 Planning Commission Agenda Item No. 5.a Attached for your review is a memorandum from Ed Matthiessen and Diane Spector with Wenck Engineers, representing the Shingle Creek/West Mississippi Watershed Commissions. The two watershed groups are requesting to make a brief presentation before the City Planning Commission and select members of the City's Park and Recreation Commission to update members on this upcoming 3`d Generation Plan. Also attached to this memo is a copy of the PowerPoint presentation. The entire Planning Commission and members of the Park Commission have volunteered to serve as the City's Citizen Advisory Committee to the watersheds. This meeting will provide an opportunity to discuss our City's input into this plan and help prioritize implementation activities. Representatives from the watersheds will be at the meeting Thursday night to field any questions, concerns or comments you may have on this new 3`d Generation Plan. Please note there is no official action to be taken or public hearing on this item. If you have any questions or comments prior to the meeting, feel free to call Gary at (763) 569-3305 or Tim at(763) 569-3319 (email GEitel(a�ci.brooklyn-centei•.mn.us or'I'BenettiCa>ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us). Memeraadum llenck 1800 Pioneer Creek Center, Maple Plain, MN 55359 Engineers , Scientists Phone: 763-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 To: Shingle Creek/West Mississippi WMO Commissioners Technical Advisory Committee City CAC Representatives From: Ed Matthiesen, P.E. Diane Spector Date: March 15, 2012 Subject: Revised Schedule #2 for Third Generation Plan Public Input Process The Commissions at their March 8, 2012 meeting reviewed and made further revisions to the schedule for completing the Third Generation Plan. These revisions affect the City Citizens Advisory Committees and the schedule for citizen meetings to review components of the Plan. The original schedule called for three potential CAC meetings, one each in March, April, and May. Each of these would be conducted by city representatives—the Commissioner, TAC member, or some other person—who would then report city comments back to the Commissions. The three topics were 1) an overview of the Commissions and their accomplishments in the past 10 years and preliminary identification of issues and goals; 2) an overview of proposed implementation actions over the coming 10 years; and 3) an overview of the entire Plan. The Commissions have asked that instead of having March and April meetings, that one City CAC meeting be held in late-April or early May. This would cover the first two topics noted above. A "train the trainer" session would be available for anyone who so desired just prior to the April 12 Commission meeting where the Commission's engineer would review the information to be presented. A second round of City CAC meetings would be held in late May or early June to review the entire Plan. The Commissions have decided that the third CAC meeting should be a joint meeting of one or two CAC representatives from each city. That meeting will be an opportunity for the representatives to discuss each city's input and as a group prioritize implementation activities. That meeting, which would be held in late June, would be led by the Commissions' engineer, who is writing the Plan. The revised schedule is shown below: March 2012 EPOC meets to finalize education and outreach plan April 2, 2012 CAC presentation sent to cities April 12, 2012 "Train the Trainer" session; Commission final review of rules, Commission review of draft education and outreach plan, im lementation plan April 13 —May 9 CAC meetings to review issues and goals, implementation actions, education and outreach plan GAPlanning\Agendas\2012\M-2nd revision 3rd gen schedule_draft 2(PC 04.26.12).doc April 26, 2012 TAC final review of rules; draft proposed CIP and implementation lan, education and outreach plan -May 1, 2012 CAC pres entation sent to cities May 10, 2012 "Train the Trainer" session; Commission review of draft CIP and im lementation plan, education and outreach plan May 11 —June 13 CAC meetings to gather input on draft CIP and implementation plan, education and outreach plan -May 24, 2012 TAC meeting to continue reviewing CIP and implementation plan June 1,2012 Draft Plan available for review June 13, 2012 Commission meeting to review input Late June 2012 Final, joint CAC meeting to provide public input on draft Plan July 12, 2012 Commission review of draft plan; authorize 60-day review period July 13 —September 12 60 day city and agency review period, collate and respond to comments October 11, 2012 Public Hearing, appro yal to submit final Plan -October-January 2012 Final BWSR and agency review and approval -February 9, 2013 Commission adopts Plan 4/20/2012 Meeting Purpose • Provide an overview of the Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions and their work • Get your input on water resources priorities for Third Generation Watershed the coming 10 years ' Management Plan Shinc --reek �;�7illest✓�i�lssrss,�o� Agenda What is a Watershed? • What is a watershed and what is a watershed What Is a Watershed? management commission? A atefshed is the area of land Mat drains • What is a watershed management plan and how to a particular point along a stream does it relate to what cities do? • What have the Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions ; rd-N'bef lenr.... accomplished in the past ten years? • What are the issues identified for next ten years, �► and how do the Commissions plan to address them? 1 4/20/2012 i Surface Water Management Act 1982 Why Manage Water Resources? (Metro Water Planning Law) 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act(Clean Water Act)was intended: Each g9verned by r Management ... to restore and maintain Organization the chemical,physical, and Districts or Joint Powers biological integrity of the � Watershed Nation's waters." plan for I Water resourcesand update it every ten years Watershed Districts and Management Organizations -� - - - in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area West Shingle Mississippi i Creek and Metro Area West Watersheds Mississippi Watersheds Creeke6 = awa«.raq i ®;- A 2 4/20/2012 Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Watershed Roles and Responsibilities _:.,. . .., • Planning studies �\ •• 1984' •: •,• ••• • Development standards ,—Coordination • Monitoring,modeling,education and outreach chose Cities • powers form to retain local control • Capital projects Member • Maintenance Governed by • • by • • • • Enact ordinances,standard practices,etc. •�.-_ `. is . 0 • 0 e •' 0 F m n Plans e Watershed M Management t la tp Ian. - A framework guiding annual work plans and city Local Water Management Plans Assessment of problems and issues and corresponding goals, policies and strategies Specific steps to be undertaken over ten years c Funding and partnership strategies 3 4/20/2012 Relationship with City Planning Management Planning • First Generation Plan, 1990-2002: focus on water quantity,preventing flooding City Local Plan • Second Generation Plan,2003-2012: focus on iniplenzent water quality,education and outreach strategies 7 Third Generation Plan,2013-2022: focus on implementation and achieving outcomes Overview of Past 10 Years: Successes Overview of Past 10 Years: Successes • 13 lake nutrient TMDLs • Expansion of education and Education• Shingle Creek chloride TMDL outreach program • Shingle and Bass Creeks Biotic and Dissolved Oxygen TMDL ANEWUNNIAL • Obtained$2.2 million in grants for projects and studies •Amount of pollutant load Plans reduction necessary for� • List of potential actions that cities • Calibrated hydrologic,hydraulic, can take and water quality models 4 Shingle Creek and Bass 13 lakes do not meet water Creek have low dissolved: ► quality goals oxygen and poor biotic @� integrity Shingle Creek and Bass Creek are impaired by high Need to merea r levels of chloride from road groundwater recl salt City budget '` r. competition for Upcoming state and New water quality limitations grants regional TMDLs standards _. How to fund financial Unfunded regulatory incentives for private Managin- Impact of climate obligations property redevelopment change 4/20/2012 Evaluation and Communication What is adequate How do we influ ,,� `�'�'� progress toward s,, , . improving water behaviors that impacf, + , �, quality water quality '= OtherIssues - Water Quantity Goals How do we measure How should we provi _ our success information to and et.- - input from the pub ' -- y f Y ^ ,x Continue • +� t Increase prevent flooding flows summer L in Shingle • \ i . Shingle Cnek in lh-klyn Park 4/20/2012 a` Y 'Y ~la I Water Quality Goals ..-- - • Improve water quality to meet state standards in these lakes: Bass Eagle Crystal Middle Twin Ryan , NI—d. I akv,v„I I.It Water Quality Goals ' • Improve water clarity in �v other lakes by io% • Complete stream improvements on 30% of the length of Shingle Creek Shingle Creek,Brnnkhn Park 7 4/20/2012 Groundwater and Wetlands Goals Operations and Programming Goals • Increase infiltration to • Operate within sustainable funding level restore groundwater • Continue to share in the cost of implementation • Protect existing wetlands projects • Improve functions and • Continue to seek out grants and other funding values of wetlands where sources possible c'hemkr Dric•.rUanJ,itn.khn Park Continue the Monitoring Program Continue Education and Outreach Programming Lake water quality Sponsor volunteer events 4 tY Participate in education fairs Stream flow and quality Provide classroom education Aquatic vegetation am Fish and bu g g monitorin _ Volunteer monitoring 8 4/20/2012 Operations and Programming Goals Implementation • Maintain updated hydrologic,hydraulic,and Decrease water quality models by aA4 2onds, . • Maintain and update development rules and ' ' standards I Restore the banks and channel of Shingle Creekl:er • Serve as a technical resource for cities • = • Continue research projects L natural. • Coordinate water management between cities monitor better are getting worse, Implementation Some Questions Continue providing . • outreach • school • What do you think are the most important issues groups, ns,city councils and commissions, regarding our lakes and streams? residents, developers. • Are there some additional things we could consider doing to help our water resources? Continue • improve water quality • What's the best way to get information about ' aquatic water resources issues to residents and to commercial properties? possible,Where .ve wetlands and increase How would you persuade someone to consider infiltration • replenish groundwater. doing something new,such as a rain garden? 9 4/20/2012 Thank You ! hinc ,reek �est✓i(ss s,- 10 Cjty of Business and Development JTBrooklyn Center Department www.cityof brooklyncenter.org 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway,Brooklyn Center,Minnesota 55430-2199 Phone 763.569.3300 TTYNoice 7l l Fax 763.569.3494 MEMORANDUM TO: Chair Sean Rahn and Planning Commissioners FROM: Gary Eitel, Business& Development Director Tim Benetti, Planning& Zoning Specialist 3 CC: Steve Lillehaug, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: April 20, 2012 RE: Loren Van Der Slik/Gatlin Development- Planning App. No. 2012-006 April 26, 2012 Planning Commission Agenda Item No. 6.a Attached for your preliminary review and consideration is an updated PUD Amendment No. 1 plan set, submitted by Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company. This plan set contains a proposed Preliminary Plat for "Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition", along with full Site and Building Plans for the remodeling and separation of the former Brookdale Mall's Food Court building from the Sear's store. The new building will be identified or addressed as 1300 Shingle Creek Crossing. The Planning Commission may recall this Amendment No. 1 to the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD was initially presented at the July 14, 2011 meeting; tabled for more information; and given final consideration and approval at the August 25, 2011 meeting. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011-12 is attached for reference. The City Council later accepted this PUD Amendment and adopted City Resolution No. 2011-127 on September 12, 2011. Gatlin Development is now ready to proceed with the modifications and improvements planned for this food court building saved under this PUD redevelopment. The application for this new plat and site plan were received by the City on March 30, 2012. According to our own Ordinances, the City must place this item on the next available Planning Commission agenda after receipt. The time necessary for City staff and outside agencies to provide a complete and thorough review is next to impossible, given the tight time constraints, and the need to publish required notices in the paper and mail notices. City staff collectively agreed that with this preliminary plat application and site plan, and the need to provide Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota ample time to review the plat, the City is recommending tabling this item until the May 17th meeting. Because the City already published an early notice of the public hearing on this matter, the Planning Commission should open the public hearing; take any initial comments or questions; and table the hearing to the May 17, 2012 meeting. At this meeting, city staff hopes to have a full planning report prepared with recommendations from city planning, city engineering and hopefully Hennepin County and State of MN agency officials. Member Kuykendall introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2011-02 RESOLUTION REGARDING RECOMMENDED DISPOSI'T'ION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2011-003 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK(FOR GATLIN DEVELOMPENT COMPANY) WHEREAS,Planning Commission Application No. 2011-003 submitted by Loren Van Der Slik(For Gatlin Development Company)proposes a Planned Unit Development Amendment to allow the following changes to the Brookdale redevelopment plan: 1. The demolition of approximately 750,000 sq. ft. of the mall including the former J C Penney's,Mervyn's and Macy's stores. 2. The renovation of approximately 122,000 sq. ft. of the mall located north of Sears with architectural changes to provide exterior identity and access while maintaining an indoor mall component. 3. The planned development of a 398,794 sq. ft. of new retail space laid out in a Town Center theme that includes a major anchor retailer with groceries,three junior box retailers,four restaurant pad sites, and six smaller retail sites for retail/service multi- tenant buildings. 4. The day-lighting of Shingle Creek and enhancements to on-site storm water management, landscaping and lighting; and WHERF.,AS,Resolution No. 99-37, established a PUD/C-2 zoning classification for the Brookdale properties on March 8, 1999 and included the following modifications to the development standards for the redevelopment of the Brookdale Planned Unit Development: - Allowed a 5 ft. rather than 15 ft. green strip at certain locations with a 3 to 3 '/z ft. decorative masonry wall. - Allowed 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable area. - Allowed 60 ft. wide parking dimensions for standard 90 degrees parking and aisle width. - Allowed two freestanding signs up to 320 sq. ft. in area along Hwy 100. - Allowed an increase of 15 percent to 20 percent restaurant use without requiring additional parking; and, WHEREAS, Exhibit A, attached to this resolution identities the commercial uses and intensity of development included in the 1999 PUD application and references the 2004 PUD amendment for a Dairy Queen Chill & Grill,and the 2007 PUD amendment involving the demolition of the Mervyn's site and construction of a 184,000 sq. ft. Super Walmart; and 1 I III WHEREAS, the applicant has provided the following PUD plans and exhibits which provide the framework for this Town Center redevelopment to be known as Shingle Creek Crossing: Master Plan, Site Plan, Phasing Plan, Existing Grading Exhibit, Proposed Grading Plan, Storm. Sewer Plan, Water Utility Plan, Sanitary Sewer Plan, Lighting Plan, Landscaping Plan, Circulation Exhibit, Shared Parking Exhibit, Exterior Elevations, Shingle Creek Exhibits for DayLighting / Water Features / Bridge Elevation, rendering of the development, Roadway Cross Sections, and Signage Program; and WHEREAS, the proposed Planned Unit Development has been reviewed and found to meet the following PUD criteria for approval of a PUD amendment: 1. The plan is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the PUD ordinance; 2. The plan is consistent of the plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; 3. The plan will positively influence/impact the neighborhood in which it is to be located;and 4. The plans and exhibits demonstrates the adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on February 17, 2011, when a staff report and public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development Amendment were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development Amendment request in light of all testimony received and the provisions of the Planned Unit Development ordinance contained in Section 35-355 and the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2011-003 submitted by Loren Van Der Slik(for Gatlin Development Company)be approved in light of the following considerations: 1. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance and will allow for the redevelopment of a significant portion of the Brookdale Regional Mall site which is considered to be vital to the stabilization of other commercial properties within the community. 2. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, 2 i complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal will conform with city ordinance standards for the most part with the exception of the following allowed variations from the zoning ordinance which are considered reasonable standards to apply to this proposal: • Allow 5 ft. rather than 15 ft. green strips at certain locations where an appropriate 3 to 3 '/2 ft. high decorative masonry wall shall be installed to offset negative effects along Xerxes Avenue. • Allows a reduction in the 15 foot parking setback and 35 foot building setback along Bass Lake Road to offset the dedication of additional right of way for the trail improvements to replace the current trail easements. • Allow 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable retail area and 10 per 1,000 sq.ft. of restaurant area rather than the 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area and one per two seats and employee on a major shift for restaurants. • Allow the 60 ft. wide parking dimension standard for 90 degree parking rather than the 63 ft. and a 52.5 ft wide parking dimension for 60 degree parking rather than the 57 ft. • Allow two freestanding signs up to 320 sq. ft. in area along T. H. 100 and two Town Center identification signs (one additional) along Bass Lake Road and one Town Center identification sign on Xerxes Avenue. • Allow an increase from 15 percent to 20 percent of the allowable restaurant use without requiring additional parking at Brookdale based on the uniqueness of Brookdale, the mix of uses and dynamics of multiple stops per person at the Center. 4. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal is considered compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 5. The Planned Unit Development Amendment appears to be a good utilization of the property under consideration and the Shingle Creek Crossing redevelopment and is considered to be an asset to the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that approval of Application No. 2011-003 be subject to the following conditions and considerations: 3 1. Final site plan review by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council in accordance with Section 35-230 Plan Approval of the Zoning Ordinance to include but not necessarily limited to parking, building placement, access, internal circulation, pedestrian walkways, site lighting, landscaping, utility connections, architectural treatment, and building signage. 2. Final review and approval of architectural review guidelines and standards of the Planned Unit Development Plans and Exhibits. 3. The removal of the Kohl's site from this PUD application with understanding that the site remains under the provisions of the 1999 PUD standards until such time as a PUD amendment is processed to include the site into the overall Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. 4. Review and approval of storm water management and drainage conceptual improvements by Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission with final approval before the issuance of demolition and building permits. 5. Review and approval of the proposed intersection improvements at Shingle Creek Parkway and Bass Lake Road by Hennepin County. 6. Review and approval of the necessary grading plans, water and sanitary sewer utility plans, storm water management and erosion control plans, and intersection designs by the City Engineer as a condition to the issuance of permits for construction, grading, or demolition. 7. The applicant shall enter into a PUD development agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. Said agreement shall acknowledge the various modifications to City ordinances, the PUD requirements for site plan review, the framework of the PUD (Development Plans and Exhibits), cross parking and access agreements, responsibilities for private infrastructure and roadways, and conditions of approval to assure compliance with the approved development plans. 3-/0-zI -- Date Chair ATTEST: ! _ Seer ry The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Morey and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Chair Sean Rahn, Commissioners Kuykendall, Leino, Morey, Parks and Schonning. and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 4 i Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011-02 Exhibit A On March 8, 1999,the City Council accepted the Planning Commission recommendation and adopted Resolution No. 99-37 which approved the Planned Unit Development/Rezoning application to change the zoning of the Brookdale Mall properties from C-2 (Commerce) District to PUD/C-2. The 1999 PUD development plans provided for the expansion,redevelopment and rejuvenation of Brookdale Center and included the following components: - the reconfiguration of the west end of the mall to include an 89,650 sq. ft. second floor to include a 20 screen,4,252 seat movie theater; - a 13,200 sq. ft. addition to the north entrance to the mall for two restaurant sites and a new food court; - 13,000 sq. ft. addition for general retail use and revised entry way along the southerly side of the complex; - a 4,650 sq. ft. freestanding Applebee's restaurant; and - conceptual approval for three other buildings shown on the plan as buildings No. 3 (west of the Northway entrance onto Bass Lake Road) and 4 and 5 ( adjacent to the eastern entrance service road), subject to review and approval in the form of a PUD amendment by the Planning Commission and City Council;and - the following PUD adjustments to the C-2 development standards were part of the 1999 PUD Development Plan: - Allowed a 5 ft. rather than 15 ft. green strip at certain locations with a 3 to 3 '/s ft. decorative masonry wall. - Allowed 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable area. - Allowed 60 ft. wide parking dimensions for standard 90 degrees parking and aisle width. - Allowed two freestanding signs up to 320 sq. ft. in area along Hwy 100. - Allowed an increase of 15 percent to 20 percent restaurant use without requiring additional parking. On July 26,2004 the City Council accepted the Planning Commission recommendation on a PUD amendment for a 4,195 sq. ft. Dairy Queen Grill and Chill restaurant on the site referenced as Building 3 (west of the Northway entrance onto Bass Lake Road.) That proposed development did not proceed and site remained an overflow parking area. On August 27, 2007, the City Council accepted the Planning Commission recommendation and adopted Resolution No. 2007- 112, which approved an amendment to the PUD involving the demolition of the former Mervyn's(Donaldson's) Department Store to facilitate the construction of an 184,600 sq. ft. Walmart Super Center. The proposal involved the creation of a 14.27 acre lot and involved the closure of the Northway intersection(Mall entrance). 5 ..---..................................................._..._... ----- I Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011-02 Exhibit A On August 27,2007,the City Council accepted the Planning Commission recommendation and adopted Resolution No. 2007- 112, which approved an amendment to the PUD involving the demolition of the former Mervyn's(Donaldson's) Department Store to facilitate the construction of an 184,600 sq. ft. Walmart Super Center. The proposal involved the creation of a 14.27 acre lot and involved the closure of the Northway intersection (Mall entrance). I i The proposed development was legally challenged by Sears under the terms and conditions of the Master Operating Agreement for the Brookdale Center and subsequently the application was withdrawn. In 2008-09, the Brookdale Mall properties were turned back to the lender, formal foreclosure proceedings occurred, the General Operations Agreement for the Mall expired, and the new property owner, Capmark Financial, retained a commercial real estate company to market the property. In 2010, Gatlin Development Company acquired the Macy's Site(former Dayton's lot)and entered into agreements with Capmark Financial to acquire the balance of the Mall,excluding the Sear's and Midas lots. II i ' I i i 6 Member Carol Kleven introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2011-127 RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2011-016 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK (FOR GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) WHEREAS, Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company (Applicant) submitted Planning Commission Application No. 2011-016, which proposes a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to allow the following changes to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, on June 13, 2011, the City adopted Resolution No. 2011-85, which approved Planning Commission Application No. 2011-009 and which approved and established the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development plan for the redevelopment of Brookdale Mall and included the following variations from the zoning ordinance: A. Allow a 5 ft. rather than 15 ft. green strips at certain locations where an appropriate 3 to 3-%x ft. high decorative masonry wall shall be installed to offset negative effects along Xerxes Avenue. B. Allow a reduction in the 15 foot parking setback and 35 foot building setback along Bass Lake Road to offset the dedication of additional right of way for the trail improvements to replace the current trail easements. C. Allow 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable retail area and 10 per 1,000 sq. ft. of restaurant area rather than the 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area and one per two seats and employee on a major shift for restaurants. D. Allow the 60 ft. wide parking dimension standard for 90 degree parking rather than the 63 ft. and a 52.5 ft wide parking dimension for 60 degree parking rather than the 57 ft. E. Allow two freestanding signs up to 320 sq. ft. in area along T. H. 100 and two Town Center identification signs (one additional) along Bass Lake Road and one Town Center identification sign on Xerxes Avenue. F. Allow an increase from 15 percent to 20 percent of the allowable restaurant use without requiring additional parking at Brookdale based on the uniqueness of Brookdale, the mix of uses and dynamics of multiple stops per person at the Center. RESOLUTION NO. 2011-127 WHEREAS, the proposal under this consideration comprehends additional adjustments not approved under the 2011 PUD Agreement,which are noted as follows: 1. The physical separation of the existing retail mall/food court building from the existing Sears retail store building; 2. The renovation/conversion of the interior mall (common area) into retail space, which expands the net leasable retail area from 123,242 sq. ft. to 150,591 sq. ft.; 3. The elimination of proposed Building N from the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD plan; 4. The expansion of the central parking area on Lot 2, Block 1 (Building N lot)which adds 103 parking stalls to serve the additional retail of the Food Court building; 5. The addition of a 6,000 sq. ft. commercial pad site with 30 parking stalls labeled as Building R, located at the southeast corner of Xerxes Avenue/56`h Avenue entrance, along with a new 0.71 acre lot. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on July 14, 2011, where a staff report and public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development Amendment were received and considered by the Planning Commission; the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development Amendment request in light of all testimony received, including the guidelines for evaluating such amendments as contained in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan; the public hearing was closed; and the matter was tabled to a later date; and WHEREAS, the City's Planning Commission tabled this matter to the August 25, 2011 regular meeting, where a follow-up staff report was presented regarding this Planned Unit Development Amendment; the variations requested by Applicant were revised and presented; and this matter was given further consideration by the Planning Commission. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No. 2011-016 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2011-12 on August 25, 2011; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered Application No. 2011-015 at its September 12, 2011, regular meeting and in light of all testimony received the Planning Commission' s recommendations. RESOLUTION NO. 2011-127 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2011-016 submitted by Gatlin Development Company is approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The Planned Unit Development Amendment is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City' s Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. 3. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City' s Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 4. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this development can be considered an asset to the community. 5. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating Planned Unit Development Amendment as contained in Section 35-355 of the City' s Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that approval of the proposed planned unit development amendment referenced under Application No. 2011-016 be approved and subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. Allow the physical separation of the existing retail mall/food court building from the existing Sears retail store building as shown on the August 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan (labeled with "Existing Dock"). 2. The Applicant shall submit detailed design elements of this separation area, including (but not limited to) roadway and pedestrian walkway materials and standards, decorative (architectural) fencing, lighting, landscaping, and other amenities under separate site plan review. RESOLUTION NO. 2011-127 3. The City supports Applicant's desire and proposal in allowing two-way traffic for vehicles in the separated roadway segment between both buildings. 4. Architectural building elevation plans must show both walls between the separated buildings and must be equally designed and match the external wall architectural standards throughout the development, including the Sears wall. 5. Applicant shall provide a signed, executed easement agreement, license agreement or similar between Gatlin Development and Sears which provides for the construction, access and maintenance rights of the new 16' x 50' Sears entryway near the northeast corner of Sears' building. Said agreement must be reviewed by the City Attorney. 6. Allow a zero-lot line setback only to the entryway described herein and as shown on the amendment plans. 7. Allow the renovation/conversion of the Food Court interior mall(common area) into retail space, and the expansion of the net leasable retail area from 123,242 sq. ft. to 150,591 sq. ft. Final building design changes,both interior and exterior, and which may be different from those originally submitted in the 2011 SCC-PUD plan sets, including the relocation of the loading area, utility and trash enclosure areas, shall be approved under separate and future site plan consideration. 8. Allow the elimination of proposed Building N from the approved 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD plan; 9. Provide an updated major access routes exhibit for the entire development that includes defined truck routes to Site R, elimination of Site N, and for any new loading dock proposed with the existing Food Court building. 10. Truck turning and access movements must be provided to demonstrate adequacy. Final access routes and turning movements for all loading dock areas will be subject to City review and approval under final site plan consideration. 11. Allow the expansion of the central parking area on Lot 2, Block 1 (Building N lot)which adds 103 parking stalls to serve the additional retail area of the Food Court building; RESOLUTION NO. 2011-127 12. Allow the addition of a 6,000 sq. ft. commercial pad site with 30 parking stalls labeled as Building R, located at the southeast corner of Xerxes Avenue/56`s Avenue entrance, along with a new 0.71 acre lot, subject to these related conditions: a) The creation and approval of this lot shall be made under separate plat application, with final plat approval by the City Engineer and City Council; and b) The proposed Building R is located within the previously approved SCC-PUD perimeters and shall be subject to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD standards, including architectural and design material standards. 13. All other provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall remain in effect. 14. Execution of a PUD Amendment agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. September 12, 2011 7z Date Mayor ATTEST: .�A� City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dan Ryan and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Tim Willson, Carol Kleven, Kay Lasman, and Dan Ryan; and the following voted against the same: none whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. PUD AMENDMENT #1 N 0 YF SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Sheet Index s 6010 COVER SHEET � TER 6030 DEMOLITION PLAN 6040 SITE PLAN FOR 6050 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 6060 LMUTY PLAN zd 6100 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 6101 LANDSCAPE PLAN d g lgilh LOCATED AT I;a XERXES AVENUE NORTH AND COUNTY ROAD 10 BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA w SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 118N, RANGE 21W as PARCEL ID# = 03-118-21-41-0024, 02-118-21-32-0009, 02-118-21-32-0010 02-118-21-31-0056, 02-118-21-31-0055, 02-118-21-32-0014 w 02-118-21-23-0023, 02-118-21-32-0017, 03-118-21-14-0021 av=� _= 03-118-21-14-0032, 02-118-21-32-0011, 02-118-21-31-0049 q 3r W O� .J 60 th Q Q a < z (�' .y�y �. FN�F� �N pw o n m sni aQ� c W 15 a N p � $ o A 59th AV E. o 0 v F LOCATION a j rc O N ]}w 45.HILLSMEW RD. 58 z A3 w 0 AY DR. th 'm m 2 ^ m N 56th FRA VE. a w o Q . lam �N m �i < m 5 �57th AV. Oy a =BURQUES LA DR. 56th AVE. gyEn BRO )KID E _�l-s�s( 56 th A z v ECKBER DR. CENTER \LPG .'CO.DR. i < < I-- ES 5 5 th A z P�'• �' z 55th AVE.z N. w BY GAS COMPANY.GAS O) 551h J r�5v, W W STING GAS PIPING TO J i TING ANY OEMOD710N. m 54th AV'� rd d — J < < 54th< A E. ///�1 :TION AT THE EXISTING LINE i 0 0 vl _rER WLL BE BY O,S, W C z a• z < Z' X 53rd PL r " LILAC DR. vwI w MzI Do 0 0 BE DONE BY CENTERPOINT L N d •3: 0 O Z < 53rd AVE. N. z 53rd rc AV E. i$ w z N. ' >Lu S IMLL BE w OMEST TO 5 z z = z i Z i �nON OF a 52 nd AV E.N. z /0 .L MATERIALS I ( J 52 nd AVE. U 'CES NFEUa MATERIALS NEEDED TO VICINITY RGROLIND SERVICE EXISTING LINE UP TO Q N.T.S. /� MARY CABLE FOR ALL V w OR POLES p ER OR POLES MLL BE Z ~ Z ALS FIL GENERAL E VALUE PREPARED BY: � U �* ILLS WILL BE R ITY OFFRECORD. ❑IIIIIIIIII,❑ Kmley-Horn (' Z Z m and Associates,Inc. C J w w0 ° w O w ALS WILL BE U or R OF RECORD. U m Q Z nO ? GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY tCSUNTY RD LAKE J DEptAn _ I -B__- ' COUN _BAS AKE,R A/ -� -- +�-=�--- -— o SxE Ne I � /� . f �, I ;�6E .._� ti u�e!EnING'`"'�„� � _ � 'Sri�c` �v` �-i-x-�� •z,�,' s DEVELOPER/OWNER aup1iui"rA�,- 62 R EASEMENT ,\ SEIBAJ N. `.1'19!.,, .'��\'�,'S •��' - _ f % GATLIN DEVELOPMENT CO..INC. wb \,•\\ - t _ I r __ .-.- L 1\ I� 11 ` 888 E.AUD BLVD.SUITE 600 _ '3\v �Y�/1 / FORT LAUDERDALE,FL 33301 M, 1(, '_;\, ( _7 y 954-302-5900 ly;' CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 6 'WIG STEVE ULCER..--, /- - -_I� ' . ,�`. �!\ `` AGE TF• .r�;I'�1' y,.: r' I /1.) /j�' CITY 301 OF BROOKLYN CENTER a �; ,/.. ,., .' Ap /, ui, I(-W^ O �; T •\yy� ` �� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT . .F. Ir\''f, - ' r�__c •\ •, '`a ''lam - 'EA^.e'\�'xM^\ a.-, 'I I Y, •- R0, ./(. ' �; --,\ - - t, ;; T �......L'1•` I ,` §•., �({' fi SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY I BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 55430T ,EMIT _"s •`/'- ';yP Y s sl+r„ .� \\, ,Y i "�� \\ YASwENT I' - ' '`\,, \ 765-569-SS40 .a `•.1, _ %>•:..f r ;,.N.'-=_ - iuTw r `�'. \\ /� �l'--[]s, Ii`�;}1: ;,` J `\`..� ENGINEER B PREPARER $ i$ "20'pRNNAGE •J y( N:.r>f�l KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES.INC. �t _ �+Y ,� •� J ututt `. 1. tB�' ,`� 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W E p,e� YEASEMENT•\i, I'. :<I�'uL EME EASNTC� SUITE 238N �• - •s✓ \do- .y / E\ je �� 81 I ``\1, ! ST.PAUL MN 55114-200 16= •� .�y-.yg �, T r \.\ `G 2 i ,I, ( p�UFrnDTH. ,`� r !/ 65LUAM D.MA IY: ���• S'�^:�}'0 \\ 1 _ cwc,�i�car�' I _ 2 �1wI�/pRNN % �/ CONTACT:W1WAM D.NATZEK,P.E. ❑ bb-� ! 'F1.fG-f. /; 1rr .• is \P�- 1\ 1 / .�� / I '� /' .' \ ��� j I��� m •t,. *v`^ SURVEYOR RA° ;; SUNDE LAND SURVEYING „ 11 9001 EAST BLOOMINGTON FREEWAY(35W) 3 SUITE 118 1 ~1 {y BLOOMINGTON,MN 55420-3435 R l Y\- \ 952-1388-9526 r Q(' �[/�I CONTACT: MK HANSON,PLS k' 4y' 4L I j' .00K1 \ �\\ _•-I _ `y �\,`\ r' , I� WIT-\� r : �o- vo-i o FASTING BUILDING: ',�`P `�- 1 ��?I °�0�3 a RETAIL ,� !M STING 159,58 SF ROPOSED 159.580 SF* '�' \/ l aovwc �I \\�= .Y / ;�� -/- �0� LEGEND \ 1.;tt^. (✓ NORTH �' MONUMENT Z \ '`•\ ( Y ~-- ,` i ,/ SECTION UNE FH ffi siN �u STI < , 0 15D 300 ------- EXISTING PROPERTY UNE •y`� j, \ I - /f� ��f�' ,//. ------- PROPOSED PROPERTY UNE SZ'is FASTING !. - ` :'�� -.._^ no yX�j SCALE FEET EXISTNG ROW UNE SEARS '?pye� •�i - �' -•_:-i?•'' yr (NOTIN 110 �� // '- / �.81XIDMC °(• ———— PROPOSED SETBACK UNE CONTRACT) 1 I�� -------- EXISTING EASEMENT UNE \ \ To'R AINA. 'l `` �� /-/'��� gS `b --------- PROPOSED EASEMENT UNE Z m 3 J fj� \__ ` _ EAST]IENT hT _ S ./Ii _ _ _ _ - FLOOD PLAIN Q o m /'�`(J d z ASST..`/ -__-_- WETLAND SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING u BUILDING ,�\ ' wm ,'.rJ\''\••.-,/ ,�`',. 'PUBLIC •--------_-_•••• EXISTING CURB UNE �•ll' "SE'NFNT ---_--=-✓ NE STINGDR 2ND ADDITION ee n �T ^ TREELINE Ia m cn SANITARY SEWER LINE - w A� PRELIMINARY PLAT r TM SECTION 2-T118N-R21W WATER LINE mowN/ U STORM SEWER UNE I..L Z � BROOKLYN CENTER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA — OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNE U — UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNE Q W l DO , GAS UNE L_ (Jv � O UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION UNE CONTOURS J Z U SANITARY MANHOLE w/V/ = `� • / ��� 12 SANITARY UFT STATION L^L c/) �/ LL ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT HYDRANT / GOPHER STATE CALL ONE WATER VALVE j - MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS WATERMAIN MANHOLE FINAL PLAT DESCRIPTION Of F TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 ® STORM SEWER MANHOLE 0 PROJECT LOCATION Lot I,BI«k 1 of snmcreek Rle c c.o�z�ny 2nd AddD'�on W 1n a® STGRM SEWER CATCH BASIN Z h.- Z ROOF DRAIN —j5 Z Z •MAST LA a°� 4 AC OO LYN �T D FLARED END SECTION vU) w 61sT AVE. N CEN Ef $ EXISTING PLAT DESCRIPTION mPRAR O ll z 7 d'mN�iE lA 5 5 z cQ' 0/ Z Lot 2,Blotll 1 R Lot 3.Block t of$AFgle treek Crmsinq O�M UGHT POLE 'LL\_ >- W GAS METER v J C GAS VALVE Y Y <i �a © Y 1"N4Y D0.U �SNLL9VCW Ap. W O Z ® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER W Y �r U AK.� � N N•y� _ O ELECTRIC MANHOLE W $ ®s m ELECTRIC HH U } ly —INES lA � l.�N' •& pR ' ® ELECTRIC BOX LLI � Z xtn A.E. AvE BR KDALE g,}' S° J�TV 0 0 al E 'A CENTER- ° i B MONITORING WELL V U z TRAFFIC U HT { •1 t'A' V 1' zSSNr AVEY N. _ __.........____........._._ Z Z \ `V\ ; _ •` 0 BO 120 \ 1 z \� \ L ♦ o \ \ VV\ ; 1`` '-h SCALE FEET w q�\\\\� t • \ SITE KEY DEMOLITION LEGEND N \ \ '\ • // T.S. • �, A\ E%I$TNG BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED ♦: X \ \ �� / (REF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) / t ♦/ EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE REMOVED Z ♦ i T y ♦ -_ � EXISTING CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED � I � + E%IUTNG 1IIUMIN0U5 PAVEMENT • y� TO BE REMOVED °t �• �\ V ♦ � d/^t -- EXISTING WATERMAIN 70 REMAIN E� ♦ �_ l � f t t _ • \ R f: EXISTING SANITARY SEWER TO REMAIN ;10 t • • _ �� "' - - EXISTING STORM SEWER TO REMAIN \\ \ \ ♦ � � ® \4_f / -- '• EXISTING UNDERGROUND COMM.TO REMAIN 11 Rzb \ V` • V R EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TO REMAIN SF \ • t t - EXISTING GAS MAIN TO REMAIN • \\ . \ yT tYV CURB REMOVAL ^ JG. � ` ' ------- FULL DEPTH SAW CUT N ' •• \%, 4 � � / / // o O O O o O❑e LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE € � \ ------� PROPERTY LINE �am� �� . C G NOTE:ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTIUTIES. aY SF± `` C.'�\ RELOCATE �f �\ EXISTING HYDRANT W o L EXISTING SEARS (NOT IN ♦ \� \ �, Z CONTRACT) \ \�•�\\\ \1�'�• ♦ `\ O ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT W . GOPHER STATE CALL ONE \ • MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 f: BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS F 7W1N CITY AREA REA 65 651-4-4 54-0002 W EEnn \ �� ,// ♦• THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE Z Z Z ANTICIPATED\/T✓• , - ." t + THIS PROJECT.CONTRACTOR'S W BID SHALL INCLUDE GONSDERA FOR CONSTRUING THIS I SSUE.REFERENC E _ THE (n I) 1 \ CONSTRUCTION DATED CONTINGENCY PLAN BY BRAUN Q V L GROUND DATED WATER 2011 FOR / � • �+, // GROUNDWATER DEWATTRING REQUIREMENTS. Z Z fit,,,.� � � \L ��•�� '-� ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: W Q Z 1. 1ME SITEWORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE ui O W • ��`� ^STE SPECIFIC SPECIFICATIONU.+ LL 2. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REWIRED U m Q } 1 BY ERFORMED COOS$ANDI OR O CON SERVICE COMPANIES SMALL FI W Z 1 J��f®per S YY CONNECTION OF SERVICES.FACT COMPLETION ANO 7HE FINC —i PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK G'NOE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FJ--__ ,.,,,., p 'A NORTH i. .'•___�� ♦ N� aT` '• r••' `• ACCESSIBLE PAWING SPACE(TYP.)PER FEDERAL ADA STANDARDS(2010)ATE F •• .,, ti 1 �' (.•' ♦ @)OR MSPACE SZE.TSGN BAND NSYMB0.(2007).SEE SHEETS 8014 k 6015 ♦ JJ 0 60 120 1 \� O PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROW(TYP.) e ♦ - - .. •• O STOP SCNAGE AND MARKING. Z / E ♦ SCALE FEET 1 � J�• _ NOT USED. y /� ♦i �� \ SITE KEY ON PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGN 30'X30'(W11-2)(TYP.) / ♦ O90'STANDMD PARKING SPACE DIMENSION 9'X18'(TYP.) N.T.S. ♦ O NOT USED. NOT USED. / ♦` �+r ©NOT USED. Z / • / j`` SITE NOTES /� ♦ O NOT USED. � A ♦•� 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY NTH ALL CITY/CWNTT RECUUnONS 3 ♦��+� AND CODES AND O.S.H.A.STANDARDS ON AREA STRIPED AT SYSL/4'AT 15'O 2'O.C. }'� ♦ 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS ♦ NOT USED. AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES.SLOPE PAVING.SIDEWALKS,EXIT PORCHES,MUCK O yY ♦ DOCKS,PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE NOT USED. LOCATIONS. i6 ♦ 3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ME TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL SEED.MULCH Eg �Z9 ♦ — AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS ESTABLISHED.SEE 02900 @)NOT USED. m g 'ESF� / ♦ SPECIFICATION. gggY 1. ALL PARKING ISLAND OVISDE OURBED RApll ON PROPERTY ME TO BE 10.INSIDE ®NOT USED. xxfy)q / I / RADII TO BE B',UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ❑ Eg^ ♦ 5. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ME TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ®PEDESTRIAN-LEVEL LIGHT POLE 4 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS,(UNLESS OTHERWISE /i Q NOTED ON PLANS)INCLUDING BUT NOT UNITED TO,ALL UTIUTIES,STORM O NOT USED. OT DRAINAGE,SIGNS,TRAFFIC SIGNALS k POLES,ETC.AS REWIRED. ALL WORK ❑ 9t• ♦ ALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND @)PROPOSED TYPE B6-18 CURB. / D ♦ SHALL SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH.ALL O PROPOSED CONCRETE SDEWAM.ALL SIDEWALKS 6'WOE UNLESS NOTED / ♦ \ 1i COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. V OTHERWISE / \ 7. SITE BOUNDARY,TOPOGRAPHY,UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A JG: \ W 10'RIDE RAISED CROSSWALK. i ♦ TOTAL BY A LAND S80.8810. O F ♦ p / S. TOTAL LANG AREA IS IS PR ACRES.LOT 1,BLOCK 1 PROPERTY 19 14.11E ACRES. X DECORATIVE RAIL � / ♦ \\ \'a; E 9. THE SITE WORK FOR IRIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED'THE SITE SPECFIC Q n SPECIFICATIONS. �? MT Y PEDESTRIAN RAMP. U ♦ 1 b 10.ALL WORK ES BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK,FINAL UTILITIES,AND FNAL GRADING) O °off a S F± / ♦ �� , S BYTE MILESTONE ONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS U ♦ \1 11.CONCRETE JOINTING AND RULERS TO BE COMPLETED PER OCTAL(TYPICAL OF ALL O NOT USED. E w 1 SF / 1i.j i\ EXTERIOR CONCRETE EXCLUSIVE OF MCHITECTURAL CONCRETE). / /• 8 \ 12 CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT INTEGRAL CURB AT LOCATIONS ADJACENT TO NOT USED. N Z t � HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT. T ADA ACCESSIBLE / / \~ \ ♦'P O J� RAMP / H O A BB NOT USED. ate° Q / JJ / :� O NOT USED. ° x JJ VT \ .S / \ ®NOT USED. ¢ r @ NOT USED. ¢d IN, jr li / V JJ a . a tl ` THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ONOT USED. aF �3H X``// > ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT.CONTRACTOR'SPPP RE // C i BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR NOT USED. V'��o no E �`�y1 ` ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE.REFERENCE THE O >-3O+pw D ♦ ♦ �„rJ CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY PLAN BY BRAUN MM NOT USED. i / 1 INTERTEC DATED 05/27/2011 FOR / // ♦ GROUNDWATER DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS. ONOT USED. ¢v°i¢'� o \ \ a I I \ OINTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND. O U U Z / JJ • SYMBOL LEGEND: U % _ '\ ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT ___— PROPERTY LINE GOPHER STATE CALL ONE b MN TOLL FREE 1-80D-252-1166 ®Q Irlr•-#"� EwsnNG LIGHT POLE 17 \ BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS -8 PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN-LEVEL LIGHTING ♦ TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 \\ STANDARD PARKING STALL(9.5 X 18') K.�. •y \ O PROPOSED PARKING SPACES(YELLOW STRIPING) EXISTING I ♦ ' PRE HYDRANT.SEE UTIUTY PLAN. SEARS :� `C JJ \�.•` V IN ■■■■ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE Z (NOT IN CONTRACT) ♦�"�\ bq JF LI ♦y \' d ♦\ ♦• •♦ W ♦ • I- ♦�\ PAVEMENT HATCH LEGEND: V�Y i4 PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT ♦} ♦ N ` ♦ V`, �d PROPOSED HEAVY OUTT CONCRETE LL O TY 4 ♦ LL ♦ \ PROPOSED CONCRETE ' � W ♦ L rn Z U \� ♦♦ \ D PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT ) Lu ♦ \ cQUL V` ♦ `., AR CHITECTURAL BUILDING APRON(REF. O r ,i 1 ♦ ARCH.PLANS) Z Z • U J W �� • ♦ `1 `1 Q t .r♦♦y / W O Z SITE DATA TABLE � W W p • / U coBuIIDING DESIGNATION LOT AREA GUIDING PAWING PROVIDED RATIO co �� q ♦ ,F EXISTINGRETAIL6uILgN LOT I.BLOCK 1414ACHES 15950050.fT. SPACES <.SJ W Z EL / Wry 8 ..EO.uEe ESE LRUUrumunnw.ce NORTH �., _— II \\ `849•`J —___ PROPERTY LINE OR FASTING CONTOURS VVVV '♦ - I $D VN ' V\ \ PROPOSED CONTOURS /\ y0 vJ -�{ ♦I J If \ —.---.—.— GRADE BREAK LINE r • \ ♦I \ / y\ �l r/ PROPOSED PRIVATE STORM SEVER I �� ' ♦ \ -// S0� \ S PROPOSED STORM SEVER INLET 0 60 120 _ I'` ♦ I \ p' / \�� ® ♦ PROPOSED STORM S EVER MANHOLE )1 ' / ♦( `�IVVi/// ® SCALE FEET 1 1 ¢ 1' r EASING STORM SEWER INLET ...JJJ FASTING BIOTIN SEWER MANHOLE � \ II..ti I \ gSOU ! Jan•. S/•` ---.---_>-- EASING STORM SEWER ` SITE KEY j\`. ♦ 0 �I'\ ``���' EDEN EMERGENCY OVERFLOW AND ELEVATION N.T.S. .. / BS \\I� \ ♦♦ '+I 1/-� i 1 DIRECTION OF OVERLAND now \ \\ i ' j/ n sEZ 8xy RE SSD35 v , y IE:841.38(N) �\! qG. > SF± -- - - - - F JUS x s \ w AD (a , , ,`. wo R SFt RE 831.22 � \\l 'S LM 852% • '^' ';Sr. ! `:. \ o C= t .■. III, \ <� RE: 1T� 33 IE:840.74(N)) ` \�•� '"._ \., \mow �m<g o E:84 0 74(S) W. 51-F ` ` \♦ 6rdjF �N AIN 84LF ` ♦ {l 5 iox 15 EIRE 71LF w 01.00S yy`♦ ♦ I` \ �' W�w2 0 15'HOPE MT 32 T \ ♦ - sm�y�50 00. ADJUST \ gg1 ,) ` O> RE 851.93 �y f /./ ` `,` :I \ z m t m CORE 15'HDPE STORM \r. 1 /' 41° m m DRAIN INTO EASIING /' \`\, 1 1yC STRUCTURE I m E:845.59 X3 g58g1 I♦ ,/1 ADJUST M a IE:840.KSE) �!. �y \ I \ ( ♦ `�SIT EXISTING IE:B45.59(ly SEARS �.-� .� r .� Z Q (NOT IN Q C�♦ �' / e\ CONTRACT) - ' W II�IDJUST M•\♦ '� /0~ �J'♦i 4/843 Q Q/ z 839.43. ■�!! `�mi `�� ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE �; ,Ilm ��• ADJUSTED TO MAL GRADE �•� `\"��``�`.�"� ,��.. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE Q C I 1 ♦\�\"�`�` \\„ �ij>/- ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT.CONTRA BID S CTpYS `\�`r\ >' ���sss ♦ `�'.``'�' '`��\�� i��'���� HA INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR LL W ADDRESSING TI IS ISSUE.REFERENCE THE w j \ /' / 1 : \````.``.`�`�,```, ��•�� ��� CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY PLAN BY BRAUN Z Z cp ,i TERTEC DATED 05/27/2011 FOR Z Z U) Lij ♦ \\V " �_�..�� /�'iY INGROUNDWATER DEFATERING REQUIREMENTS. - ♦\�___�' - ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT LLJ GOPHER STATE CALL ONE U r_,,a - j _-/`y I ,`i ♦ /i MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 �I \ / I ♦*. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS S W W O 0 THAN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 Z LLJ ``gAi ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: U m Q > j // ♦♦ / ALL M GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK, W Z III fj' I / PJ UTILITIES,AND FINAL GRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN J 7 PROJECT DOCUMENTS. YF1 0 Z -0 z n C 20 Z > m z 0 m 0 m 0 M Cf) z z N Z ``\D \ rid ,p..D T& o G) KOG2:3 MW Ismov 0 fl \\�smmn—W—d Z-HM x3 3na iron I....3 f 3 HWM a 3S An1M5 ONMSM3 All, (13V 1N 00 NI 10 S2jv is IN..Svc SNLLS.3 bu...­­1-0f3 —W--QN—Nn 3-3 0.--—S.3 A GN3031 t> gmm z I z1.n$K D'. \ ..'`\ I R1.21K 0221A IT a > A'M W"H ONUSIX3 Rr3013H z > il A,oz Zi Z99:38 I'T 4! M-ij.jsnr� A X3 0 STN k3)1 311S 5 Al0 1333 .''`*� - ,q5'• b��--- NORTH D BO 120 1 q a SCALE FEET y O aq f s ! 1 PERMANENT GRASS SCHEDULE �:• SHRUBS 8 PERENNIALS Z6 KEY ICOMMONNAME I BOTANICAL NAME SEEDING RATE LAWN soo � x °�, `,V KENTULI(Y BLUE GRASS POA PMTENSIS ; b FESCUE FESTUCAw pp{ LCN WY GFELLCMEVVINGS FEl1E SC FESTUCACON9AUTATA g,�:a SHEEP FESCUE FESTUCA OVIM ` LHAPoOT HPRD FESCUE FEE CABREVI%LIAff­CJFCUA) -- SHOPELINE—EllRCREEPINGREp FESCUE FEE--RUBRA MVIGATIXi CREEPING RED FESCUE FESRICq RUBM SUBS.ROOM ❑ ��ies 1 HEROJHAROFESCUE FES UCABREVIPIUI 9 \ NO moW SEED " pp OGF ELLOW p1EYNNGS SCUE FESTUU UITATA SS 8AWE SLHEEP FESCUE 4 3 FESIUCA OVIM SOI LBS/ACY1E ' CWIRIOTHARDFESCUE FESTUCA BREVIPIUA F.LONDFOUA) 211.11LOSIACRE SHOREUNESLENDERCREEPINGREOFESCUE FESTUCA RUBM 21d LBSIACRE \ MVIGATOR CREEPING REp FESCUE FESTUCA RUBM SUBS.RUBRA 30.11 LOSlAGE VG. \ 1! HERON HARDFE6 lE FEO UG BREVIPIA 211.3 LBSIACRE g MTVFIVET REED NMI �o � SF± i SF± ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT w 15 GOPHER STATE CALL ONE a�<� AN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 =�5 i Z. T� ? BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 li \ ^•,.s o-,,_ ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: %;5 A WA GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK, LL 3GmvOr \ FINAL UTILITIES.AND FINAL GRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE N m 5Oi G PROJECT DOCUMEN S.OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB ugwoi \\ TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR z� o THE OUTLOT.VITA GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS �S8 H FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL MMES \\ V` AFTER MILESTONE DATE PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT S 3 \ DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REWIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS 333 FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. Z m LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES 1. PLACE 4'DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH IN ALL PLANTING BEDS 2. MULCH ALL DECIDUOUS TREES MTH 3 FOOT DIAL MULCH RING AND ALL EVERGREEN TREES \\\ TO DRIP LINE WITH 4'SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE EXISTING / '•' SUCH AS PREEN PRIOR TO MULCH PLACEMENT Q • V 3. ESD WH TALL STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER ERE TURF AREAS MEET SHRUB/PERENNIAL PLANTING ^J^ SEARS \\ C SEE LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR PLANTING BED PREPARATION AND INSTAUAMON LL REQUIREMENTS (NOT IN \ ::; d 5. ALL PLANTING BEDS AND TURF AREAS WITHIN THE UMRS OF CONSTRUCTION TO BE CONTRACT) 'r IRRIGATED WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGATON SYSTEM. NO IRRIGATION WITHIN STORMWATER AND b - ' INFILTRATION AREAS OR AREAS ED WITH NAP SEED MIX � � •1'. 5® NATIVE/WET Q 6. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE ACQUIRED FROM SOURCES WITHIN HARDINESS ZONES 3 OR 4 LEGEND 0 ,yam 7. KEEP ALL SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS A MINIMUM OF 16'OFF EDGE OF PAVEMENT Q y / 8. SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS MT W H KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS-FESCUE SOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PLACE SOD OVER 4'OF TOPSOIL SEED ALL PHASE 2 AREAS-SEE EROSION 0 Z COIIIROL PLANS ®�,., EXISTING TREES(TO REMAIN) Q SOD AREAS AS NOTED WITH NO MOW TYPE ALL FESCUE SOD. _J 10.HOLD ALL LANDSCAPING 2'FROM TRAILS/SIDEWALKS. ' C V` 11.ALL AREAS NOTED TO BE SEEDED WITH NO MOW TURF ARE TO BE MAINTAINED IN THE . NO MOW SEED MIX: E . \ REFER TO @900 SPEC PART 2.3 REGULAR MAINTENANCE MOWING CONTRACT ADHERING TO THE CITYS PREVAIUNC N COMMUNITY STANDARDS FOR TURF MAINTENANCE LL F U p pi y PHASE 1 PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE Z z SYMBOL CITY COMMONNAME SIZE ROOT SWM1P WMTE bU( 2.S CAL B S B O Z Z f COMMON HACKBERRY 2.S'CAL B&B c 116 � J- LU ACCOLADE ELM 2.S f B 6 B U J cC AUTUMN BLALE MAPLE 2.S CAL 0 S B C s !�.•' OVERSTORY 1 p a pEL1pX%IS LIJ O OYW Z NGASPEN 0 � O Z NNT. 1 II�(I,IjI' .~ •. ® BIRCH T_j 410 CCHT. LLI I I •/ / 14 IVORY SII%LILAC .10 CON". LL ORNAMDEE— CRAOAPPLE 110 CONT. LLI Q Z BLACN HILLS SPRUCE SHT S&B J Q O= z a Z NORTH I SO 1zo SCALE FEET 1^ O 5 I � I PERMANENT GRASS SCHEDULE SHRUBS&PERENNIALS z° KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SEEDING RATE �Pf{ lAWNSW j� R KENTUCKY BLUE GRASS PMPRATENSIS J3J FESCUE FESTLKAy- No Mow so0 �'q LONGFEL-CHEVANGSFESCLE FESNUCCMMUTATA :a SHEEP FE30.1E FEST1- DVNA y��B LW1RIOf HFIRD FESPIE FESTUCA BREWPILG ff.LONGFOLW SHORELINE SLENDER CREEPING RED FESCUE FESTLGARUSRA ❑ S5Y�� NALAGATORCREEPINGREDFESCUIE FESTUCA RUBRA SU&S.RUBRA II9^ HERON HFIRD FESCUE FESTULA BRENPXA =!9 NDMOw SEED 4-YFC LCNGFELLOW CHEYWNDSFESCUE FESTLXA COMAUTFITA 50 Uf51ALTE SHEEP FESCUE FESTUOlO m NALBSIACRE CIW%OTHARDFESCUE FESTUCA BREWPR 1.LONGFOLN) IBA LBSACRE SHIOREUNE SLENDER CREEPING RED FESCUE FESTUFA RUBRA 2B.B..ACRE WIVIWTOR CREEPING RED FESCUE FEBIUfil RL9M SUBS.RUBM 3aA LBSAQE i\yl)( X/ - HERON HYIRDFESCUE FE6T1fABREVPIA 28A L83/ACRE I �'� �lE�/ 'd/ HNTVFJWEFSEFAMX �a ARCH LINE - SEE SHEET 6100 T 111 y./ ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT �J r o' a . GOPHER STATE CALL ONE ag MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CITY CONSTRUCTION 651-454-0002 TION BEGINS �m D = / �m 1 lop, <e ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK, t 3N<W O \��G`\ /./ �•/�(w FINAL WIXG UTILITIES,AND FINAL GRADING))BY THE MILESTONE DATE N m Suz PROJECT DOCUMENTS.QUTI.OT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE Of JOB w�woz TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR Q THE OUTIOT.M GENERAL CONTRACTOR N PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS FOR R TLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC PARCEL AT ALL TIMES AFTER MILESTONE DATE.PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT 0 2 pZ /' / „•. DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REWIRED BY STATEADCAL REQUIREMENTS 3 `\i";_\��T�/ l fI �•/ FOR SPECI%C OViLOT. Z m m LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES W a _ 1. PLACE a'DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH IN ALL PLANTING BEDS 2 MULCH ALL DECIDUOUS TREES WITH 3 FOOT DIA MULCH RING AND ALL EVERGREEN TREES iw��'-`-�•�• /i` f TO DRIP LINE MTH A'SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. APPLY PRE–FI.EJTWIT HERBICIDE AICHI AS PREEN PRIOR TO MULCH PLACEMENT "�S ,I• 3. INSTALL STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER WHERE TURF AREAS MEET SHRUB/PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS Z s•�\ a p��. % a. SEE LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR PLANTING BED PREPARATION AND INSTALLATION Q^ REQUIREMENTS L.L S ALL PLANTING BEDS AND TURF AREAS WITHIN THE UNITS OF CONSTRUCTION TO BE IRRIGATED WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. NO IRRIGATION"THIN STORMWATER AND INFILTRATION AREAS OR AREAS SEEDED WITH NATIVE/WET SEED MIX ui 6. PUNT MATERIALS SHALL BE ACQUIRED FROM SOURCES WITHIN HARDINESS ZONES 3 OR a �••'•�� //l Q 7. I®ALL SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS A MINIMUM OF 18'OFF EDGE OF PAVEMENT LEGEND U '�•.�•�...�f` 8. SOD ALL DISTURBED ♦� U AREAS WITH KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS–FESOIIE SOD UNLESS OTHERWISE VJ NOTED. PLACE SOD OVER a'OF TOPSOIL SEED ALL PHASE 2 AREAS–SEE EROSON jCONTROL PLANS ;.1.. MSTINDTREESLTOpE m / 9. SOD AREAS AS NOTED WITH NO MOW TYPE ALL FESCUE SOD. 10.HOLD ALL LANDSCAPING 7 FROM TRAILS/SIOEWNRS. C `^•. J 11.ALL AREAS NOTED TO BE SIDED WITH NO MOW TURF ARE M BE MAINTAINED IN THE rvOMwvsEED NBX REGULAR MAINTENANCE MOWING CONTRACT ADHERING TO THE CITY'S PREVAILING - REFER T002Stta SPEC PART 2.x COMMUNITY STANDARDS FOR TURF MAINTENANCE PHASE 1 PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE C7 LLJ 10, Z z SYMBOL 11-COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT Z Z swuw wTaTE GAK zr rx B&B U) LLB 1 (' }` CGAMON HACKBERRY I.S CAL S a B O U , ELM 2.S CAL B 8 B Z OVERSTORY AUTVANBLAZ -LE 2.S CAL, Ba0 J W DE. S cC GMV(IHG ASPEN B1. G-T. C ® BIRCHICLMPJ .1. COAT. Y 0 Z LLJ IvaaY.,.LILAC ne GONT. LLI O ORWJAENTK GRABAPPLE F10 COAT. n/ � W DECIDUGUS LL 2 BLACK AILS SPRUCE eHHr B&B U m RED PINE eM BIB W Z �J�EE�� 0 EVERGREEN `/ / OU VIBURNUM o COAT. Z LL Z CONSORTIUM L 1C. 901 North Third Street Suite 220 612-436-4030 a Minneapolis,MN 55401 Fax 612.692-9960 111111111 111 ��_611111D 111HIHIL) NEW EXTERIOR FACADE ENTRY ENTRY p �p GAnW DEVELOPMENT COMPANY -7 c-- - - Key Plan 120' 133' 40'• - , e SEARS ENTRY • 'PROPERTY \®®�- "" LINE NT a0 TENANT TENANT Aw m E2 E1 7 NORTH SF 23,226 SF 26,884 SF Mails Revision/Issue Date SEARS 4Z o� `n 6'-10�" 13'��"t CLEAR TO ° PROP.LINE-VERIFY SERVICE CORRIDOR SERVICE CORRIDOR L . RM T-28" 130'-0" ><FM (3 SHINGLE CREEK ZE w FUTURE ; IT TENANT ©; n CROSSING W2 w SF 25,939 SF COREa5 t BROOKDALE CENTER s REDEVELOPMENT RECEIVING a w BROOKLYN CENTER, MN F,N $ FLOOR PLAN I FUTURE TRY PROPERTY ZX N-11 LINE PROJECT NJMBER: IO-1019-0I ISSLW DATE, 03-26-17 CpC.iIEGKED BY, KA CONSORTIUM ---------------- _ . iiii�-r�� — - Street, ■.5.... .....o.■ _ -------ice—s—�- INONNImillb!bli 111��Wifi1111111� - -- I _m..�: I 1 NIIIII1 Isolillll1111111-='� ■���_ _����� .�IJI�IJIJIJIJ�.-I I - - � --• - - -_- - - I,,,,,�I, 1 111,L.I,,,,,,�I I''1 I I,„III, -■��I I:-�,1'1111111 �-1 -- 1 _. '._��i1:.-' �::�� e `�� , 11JIJIJI�IJ' ;__� lr_i��l��l Ili-milli I - -- 7�j'i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ MEN ■i �� :: ♦�� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■► Mark Revisionlissue Date �'■■0■■■00■ ■■ -� WAW -- -- SHINGLE CREEK], CROSSING BROOKDALE CENTER © REDEVELOPMENT :-.. _ - EXTERIOR I■mil■ t■�I ■fi PWJEC,T NA-15M 10-401q I 0R.Am By. 15L ---fir■ ---iii-------��i�--1�-------��►J���. PREGA5T PA11EL5 SAND FINSH BEYOND CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North Third Street,Su ite 220 612436-0030 Minneapolis,MN 55401 Fax 612$925960 INNH . 51-I0IN6 METAL • PAINTED .'CONTROL J0INf5 PPZ A5T PANELS TRASH GATES HM.DOORS YU COLORED SCORED „ ROCKFACE FINSH I GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ---- ---- ' Key Plan 56 `PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION Ina•=r-0• J�Q�•1`�•<_• ���,• I I I I I I I I 7 �'•`• •��"' I 1 NORTH Mark Revision/Issue Date b EXISTING SEARS NORTH ELEVATION Ina••r-0• E1IS1TM6 E1F5 /EXISTING / PAINTED ERICK T `7 I RE LACE EXI57.STgE RERS NEY/EIFS"'LL EXIST.HM. EXIT DOORS ,� PROPOSED SEARS NORTH ELEVATION Ina•.1'-0• !! ! I I I SHINGLE CREEK II ! I I I CROSSING ! I I 4 BROOKDALE CENTER e ExISrIN� BAST eLevArioN REDEVELOPMENT NEW EXIST.TO REMAIW NEW TENANT E2 TENANT E3 TENANTEI NEW PIERS BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 120'-0" .m b. ILL,NIN4Tm vREEIx r£f/L <7 GI.HV/� 516NA6E ' eIGKLIT llYl1tl 01[Vm LOxlYLE BIIR1"elYOIO TENANT TENANT EXTERIOR o Q 4 . I R: 4 ELEVATIONS nl_n. eRiuc eRirx erase a=.cw ease Av o.i+.u+. ewcK rnn+r® sne'Firt r+erK r-pawr sronESrm„r „r cmrs N51 ewcc E*isr.ewcX cra�rr eRs PROJECT NUMBER: 10-1019-01 ISSUED DATE. 05-2a-I2 DRAM BY. gL " CHECKED BY. KA 1�—• CONSORTIUM L.L.C. .................. J r - :�.r� 901 NoM rnird sheet.state 220 612-436-4030 Minnwpelis,MN 55401 Faa612892-9960 GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY iii;:.:'•:' � �i�.,:�, Key Plan u lo T o 0 I NORTH • Mark Revision/Issue Date G Lr G ❑ ❑ u u \,;� /A 0 0 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING \., / . -;\ BROOKDALE CENTER REDEVELOPMENT I BROOKLYN CENTER, MN W. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS U � 6AA° „_ CONSORTIUM L.L.C.' 901 Nalh Third Street.SAe 220 612436403C -`` Minneapd s,MN 55401 F-612-692-9960 �.71!i r:A. -+A\_;.� ..n\QO_A♦^S °¢�.'.AS-OA\_ CD R:!.\-"!°:,:4., GATI,IN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Key Plan t r NORTH Meek Revision/Issue Date rA e i..................._ 4U SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKDALE CENTER \ \=• ' /' v\ REDEVELOPMENT - BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 'C � rr5 _ -t-. _ .NFU r - l eE � .r��-:% ♦ ♦ _ = TENANT v - TENANT EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Planning Commission Information Sheet Meeting Date: April 12,2012 Application Filed on 3-15-12 City Council action should be taken by 5-14-12 (60 Days) -------- ----- ----- --- Application No. 2012-002 Applicant: Paul Hyde, Real Estate Recycling Inc. Location: 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue N. Request: Development/Site & Building Plan Approval — in relation to a new Planned Unit Development INTRODUCTION Paul Hyde of Real Estate Recycling, Inc. (RER) is seeking to establish a new Planned Unit Development(PUD) on the former Northwest Racquet Club/Lifetime Fitness site located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North. This new PUD involves the change of zoning of the site from C2 (Commerce) to PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 (Planned Unit Development-Mixed of Commerce and Industrial Park), along with the related development/site plans of a new 90,000 sf. office/manufacturing/warehouse facility. This item is being presented under regular consideration and not a public hearing; and notices have been mailed to the surrounding property owners. BACKGROUND The rezoning element of this PUD application was reviewed and given due consideration under separate public hearing at the April 12, 2012 meeting. At that meeting, Staff noted the development/site plan that must accompany any PUD request would be reviewed separately at the following meeting (April 26th). The rezoning part has been forwarded to the City Council for first reading and a request to set a second public hearing/second reading for May 14, 2012. The subject site consists of two vacant tracts of land. The larger tract is 7.4 acres in size and was formerly the Northwest Racquet & Tennis Club. The smaller parcel located immediately east of the Lifetime site is approximately 1.27 acres, and is still owned by the State of Minnesota. The two parcels added together would provide 8.67 acres of total area. The City has an agreement with the State of Minnesota/MnDOT to transfer this parcel to the City, whereby the City intends to transfer the same parcel over to RER. Upon completion of this transfer, the Developer intends to replat these two parcels into one large, single lot of record. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Section 35-355 Planned Unit Development, Subd. 5 Application and Review, Para. a Implementation of a PUD shall be controlled by the development plan. The development plan may be approved or disapproved by the City Council after evaluation by the Planning Commission. PC 04/26/12 Page 1 of 11 Para c. of this section identifies that the following criteria is considered in the initial creation of the PUD and consequently should be considered in subsequent changes to the PUD: 1. Compatibility of the plan with the standards, purposes and intent of this section; 2. Consistency f the plan with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; Y p g P 3. The impact of the plan on the neighborhood in which it is to be located;, and 4. The adequacy of internal site organization, uses, densities, circulation, parking facilities, public facilities, recreational areas, open spaces, and buffering and landscaping. ZONING & COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The subject site is surrounded by I-2 Heavy Industry zoning to the north; R4 Multiple Family Residence to the northwest; R2 Two Family Residence to the west; and R5 Multiple Family Residence to the southwest. The I-2 zone is virtually filled-in with existing office/warehouse developments. The R4 area consists of a number of 4-plex apartment buildings interspersed with single-family homes. The R2 zone to the west consists of a number of single-family homes with two-family (duplex)homes; while the R5 zone contains the Twin Lake Apartment complex. . !•.. y R4_ _R4- : :a ..........mL :: -R4- "IR4 R4 N: 1 ' Q: R4 R4 �--- w I R4 >R4- -R4- Q m LAKE BRE. ........ ......... Z 0 Z C2 ...... LAKJ1A E y: LL 02 R5 TWIN LAK V /� PARK Z w The City amended the current land use designation of the subject site from OS-Office/Service Business to a new "Mixed Use — OS/I (Office-Service Business/Industrial) land use category. This land use and proposed zoning allows for the redevelopment of this site with the manufacturing and warehousing development proposed under this PUD plan. The proposed PUD-MIXED C2/1-1 zoning will allow for a multitude of permitted and special uses on this site. These uses are indicated on the attached C2 and I-1 district handouts. One particular use that Staff is concerned as a permitted use under the I-1 (Industrial Park) district are "adult establishments". With the neighboring residential neighborhoods, we feel this type of business or activity is not suited or conducive to this neighborhood. As part of our PC 04/26/12 Page 2 of 11 recommendation in this PUD, Staff is recommending this specific permitted use be disallowed or prohibited on this site. This condition was similar to the approved PUD on the Howe Fertilizer redevelopment site in 2008. DEVELOPMENT/SITE AND BUILDING PLAN ❖ BUILDING&SITE LAYOUT The building sits on a north/south alignment, with parking to the east and loading on the west. The new site will be accessed with two new driveways; with one serving the large truck court to the west and the other serves as the main entry to the visitor/ employee parking lot to the east. The large parking area is designed for 260 parking spaces. The old fitness club site contained one access point off Lakbreeze Avenue, which will be closed under this new plan. Azelia Avenue to the west will not be used or provide any access points into this site. A new drainage pond and buffer strip is being provided along the west edges of this site. The office/manufacturing/warehouse building proposed under these plans measures 494-ft. by 186-ft., or just over 91,800-sf. of GFA. The building will consist of three main doorway entries along the east elevation (please note the elevation tags are mislabeled on Sheet A3.1; the north elevation should be "east"; the south should be "west"; the west should be "north"; and the east should be "south"). The rear loading areas (west elevation) contains 4 large overhead, at-grade drive-in service doors, and 9 overhead door bays for typical semi-truck loading/unloading areas. The building is similar in design and style to the previous office/warehouse facilities Mr. Hyde has developed in this area, notably the Minneapolis Business Center buildings located to the east of Brooklyn Boulevard (City of Minneapolis) at 2601 49th Avenue, and the Caribou Coffee headquarters immediately north of the site. A natural color palette and accented entry elements will be utilized. The exterior will be primarily painted, insulated concrete (tip-up) wall panels; smooth and raked finish concrete panels; synthetic stucco (EIFS) cornices above the door entries; and %2-inch recessed accented square panels and horizontal bands will be featured along the outer perimeter of the building. The main-front elevation (east) consists of large number of anodized aluminum frames and tinted, insulated glass window panels and entry doors. The end-caps with these entries will be provided with similar window and architectural treatments. As mentioned at the last April 12th meeting, the site is subject to a massive clean-up program and mitigation plan, due to the impacts associated with various semi-volatile compounds, old fill material, and asbestos paint on the ground-up asphalt tennis courts when the old fitness club was demolished a few years ago. The Applicant is in the process of soliciting funds from various state and county agencies to assist in this clean-up of the site. ❖ BUILDING SETBACKS The site plan illustrates the building will have a 35-foot setback off Lakbreeze Avenue and 35- foot off the south line. The building is setback over 180-feet off Azelia Avenue, with the truck court area shown with a 50-ft. setback. The minimum front-yard setback in the C2 zone is 35- feet, while the minimum under the I-1 district is 50-feet. City staff encouraged Mr. Hyde to reduce the original proposed 125,000 sq. ft. building footprint and realign the building as shown PC 04/26/12 Page 3 of 11 on these plans, in order to eliminate any need or use of Azelia Avenue by truck traffic servicing this site. Normally, and under rare cases, if a site or property is affected by two or more zoning classifications, the more restrictive zoning (standards and regulations) takes precedent. Under this particular redevelopment plan, the City encouraged the application to provide a mixed zoning over this site, under a new PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 zoning district. The PUD allows for some limited site development flexibility and reduced standards, including setbacks. Staff does not have any issues or concerns with allowing this building to be setback with a 35-foot dimension off Lakebreeze, as this is consistent with the original (and maintained) C2 zoning standards, which was already in place before this PUD-Mixed zoning would take place. The main parking area to the east is also provided with a 35-foot setback along Lakebreeze and approximately 15-feet off the State HWY 100 right-of-way line to the south. Section 35-700 of the City Zoning Code requires a minimum 15-foot setback from any street right-of-way. The building will be setback 180 ft. from the westerly property line (parallel with Azelia), and over 240-feet from the residential zoned properties on the opposite side of Azelia. The truck court area is shown with a 50-foot setback from Azelia. City Code Section 35-412 (Special Requirements in C2 Districts) specifies that any new development adjacent to a an R1, R2 or R3 residential district must provide a protective strip (buffer) either at the property line or public street line. In this case, a 15-ft. strip from Azelia Avenue right-of-way line, and 35-feet from the R2 district at the southwest corner. Moreover, under Sect. 35-413 (Special Requirements in 1-1 and I-2 Districts), the buffers increase to 50-ft. and 100-ft. strips respectively. No part of these buffers may be used for parking, driveways, loading, or storage, and must be landscaped. Here again Mr. Hyde was encouraged (and provided) the larger buffer separation amounts of 50-feet off Azelia Avenue and exceeds or meets the requirements at the R2 shared line. The landscaping and treatments planned for these buffers strips will be addressed later in the landscaping section of this report. ❖ ACCESS/PARKING Access to the site will only be allowed off Lakebreeze Avenue by means of the two access drives shown on the plans. No access is being provided on to Azelia Avenue to the west. The existing access to the site, which served as the main access point to the former fitness club, will be closed off. The westerly access is s 35-ft. width drive, and shall serve only those trucks that enter/exit this rear"truck court: loading area. This access is off-set from the Azelia Avenue intersection to the west by 150-feet, which was a preliminary requirement given by the City Engineer to the Developer. The other easterly access is 25-feet in width and will only serve those personal/passenger vehicles for visitors and employees to this large parking area to the east. This access is set to be aligned directly across from the westerly Caribou Coffee site across the road. The off-street parking requirement for this 90,000 sq. ft. building based on a 5 percent office/95 percent industrial/warehouse occupancy. The office use requires 1 space per 200 sq. ft., [90,000 @ 5% = 4,500 sf. / 200 = 22.5], or 23 spaces. The industrial/warehouse activity requires one space for each 800-sq. ft. of GFA, or [85,500 sf. / 800 = 106.9] or 107 spaces. The total amount required by Code (assuming these use area determinations are accurate) is 130 spaces. The site plan illustrates 254 standard parking stalls and 6 handicap accessible stalls, or 260 total spaces. It is important to note that the former fitness site obtained a private off-site parking agreement PC 04/26/12 Page 4 of 11 with Mr. Hyde a number of years ago, to use parts of Caribou Coffee's parking areas in case of over-flow on the fitness site. With this parking agreement intact, and the fact the site can sustain an 130 extras aces on this s i te, it appears this new development site will have more than enough and adequate parking to fulfill the needs of its employees and visitors to the site. The rear truck court area will only be used for the loading and unloading of semi-trucks and other service delivery vehicles. No part of this truck area will be used or allowed to park passenger vehicles. It should be noted that the site plan illustrates a small shaded region with the tag-line "proposed variance". This area is actually a small section of the truck court loading area that infringed into the required 50-foot buffer space, due to the Azelia Avenue hammerhead turn-around design configuration. Under this PUD process, no variance is needed for this encroachment due to the minimal amount and unusual situation created by this hammerhead. Planning staff would also suggest that since this site apparently has more than enough parking to accommodate these uses, that a pedestrian walkway be included in the middle area of this large parking lot. This walkway would eventually connect to the central entry point into the building. 00R_1 - PROPOSED OFFICE/ WAREHOUSE 90.000 sq.fL GROSS AREA 1 .tbcatt An�ust ' Nandcac 5!aiis - - Adjust Pm.np Lot i '. LandfLap la antla l 10 o0 40 1 I PC 04/26/12 Page 5 of 11 ❖ GRADING/DRAINAGE/UTILITIES The applicant provided preliminary grading, drainage and utility plans which are being reviewed by the Director of Public Work's/City Engineer. Attached is a copy of his site engineering review memorandum relating to this application, dated April 20, 2012. All written comments are offered for the Planning Commission's consideration. Generally speaking, the site grading calls for typical site perimeter grading along the southerly and westerly boundaries. Much of this grading is to accommodate the new levels of the parking areas in relation to the existing grades, and to provide positive slopes/drainage to the new drainage pond in the southwest corner. A large majority of the site drains southerly, with catch basins and storm pipes channeling the runoff to the southerly and ponding area. This new pond must be sized to accommodate a large portion of this site's drainage, which includes the two large parking and loading areas, along with the roof drains. The pond is designed to be a two-tiered system, with a first system (fore bay) serves as the initial sedimentation pond, which provides an outflow to the lower, infiltration pond area. The drainage plan also calls for an outlet pipe to the south and into the State HWY 100 right of way. This HWY 100 area also contains its own storm water detention pond. Staff believes the Developer will need to obtain State of Minnesota/MnDOT approvals to drain into this system. The site is providing with new 8-inch water main connection from the city water main system near the upper northeast corner under Lakebreeze Avenue. This water service line continues south through the parking lot and is looped around the southerly edge of the building, runs northerly half way through the truck court area, and ties off to the west into the existing water system under Azelia Avenue. The main service line into the new building is served at this junction where the line tees off towards Azelia Ave. Water hydrants are strategically spaced throughout the interior and outer edges of the parking lot and loading area, and along the building's perimeter. The Fire Chief will need to provide final input and approval to the location of these hydrants. Sanitary sewer services will be provided by a new 6-inch line off the main line under Lakebreeze Avenue. Staff assumes the proposed office/industrial uses planned for this new building site will be reasonably accommodated by this single, service line. B-612 curb and gutter is required around all driving and parking areas and is indicated on the plan. The grades along the easterly edge of Azelia Avenue are being lowered to eliminate the small, north/south retaining wall system installed under the old fitness club development, and allows for a smoother transition down to the lower elevation of the truck court areas. The Developer provided an east/west cross-section that represents the Azelia Avenue grades with the grades to the rear of the new building. This cross-section reveals that the loading and building's lower elevations may help attenuate noises or vehicle movements from the existing residences to the west. The inclusion of the 8-foot high cedar fence along this west edge buffer area, along with the loaded landscaping should help provide some relief to noise and visual impacts created by this building's loading area and wall massing. PC 04/26/12 Page 6 of 11 A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and/or erosion control plan was not included with these plans. A SWPPP or similar plan is required with proper erosion control measures to be installed prior to starting grading operations in accordance with best management practices. In addition, an NPDES construction site erosion control permit must be obtained from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency before any work on this site can be undertaken. ❖ LANDSCAPING/SCREENING The Developer has submitted a detailed landscape plan in response to the landscape point system utilized by the City to evaluate such plans. The 8.67 acre site requires 647 landscape points. The Developer intends to meet the point requirements by saving some of the existing trees along the outer areas, and providing additional landscaping around the perimeter of the building, inside the parking area and outer edges of the site. Their plan indicates that they will provide 57 new deciduous/ shade trees, such as Sugar and Northwood Maples, Honey Locust, Swamp White Oak, Quaking Aspens, and Lindens; plus 26 ornamentals trees, such as lilac, serviceberry, and crabapples; and 70 different varieties of shrubbery, such as spireas, cranberrybushes, and sumacs. The plant legend does not provide any new evergreen trees, such as Black Hill spruces, Colorado blue spruce or scotch pines. Instead the plans call for the retention of approximately 15 evergreens inside this site, along with 27 deciduous trees. The amount allocated for all of these new deciduous, ornamentals, and shrubs is 619.5 points. The points allowed for the 15 evergreen and 27 trees is 360 points. Although these 360 points added into the new planting points of 619.5 equates to 979.5 total points (or 332 points over the required minimum points), Staff encourages the Developer to keep this plan as submitted, and maintain this as part of the approved PUD submittal package. Staff will need to assess after the project completion that all new and existing plants called for are planted or survived the construction work, and a final determination will be made with additional plantings added if so required. A new 8 ft. high cedar fence is proposed along the west edge of this development, to provide adequate and required screening from the residential areas to the west. It was recommended under the PUD approvals for the Howe Fertilizer site redevelopment that a maintenance free material rather than the cedar be considered for the screen fence. The Commission may want to provide a recommendation for either wooden or maintenance free fencing in this area. Underground irrigation is to be provided in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance in accordance with the requirements of city ordinances. ❖ LIGHTING AND TRASH The applicant has submitted a lighting plan indicating the proposed foot candles for lighting on the site. Section 35-712 of the city's Zoning Ordinance requires that all exterior lighting be provided with lenses, reflector or shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property. Illumination is not permitted at an intensity level greater than 3 foot candles measured at property lines abutting residentially zoned property. A preliminary review of the foot candles proposed indicates that the 3 foot candle limitation is not exceeded along the property lines. PC 04/26/12 Page 7 of I 1 Building mounted lights are proposed on the west and east walls of the building. The parking lot will be provided with three, thirty-foot high double headed light poles, and three, thirty-foot single-headed light poles. No trash enclosure area has been indicated on the plan and we assume that all trash will be stored inside the building for pick up. Should any outdoor enclosure area be requested or needed after any PUD approval, a simple site plan with elevations and material list will be required for Planning Staff approvals, with full building permit review and consideration required. ❖ SIGNAGE The PUD plan included one freestanding monument style sign near the easterly entrance. This monument sign shall is dimensioned as 10-ft. wide by 6-ft. high. The exact or final location of this sign may need to be determined later during the review and consideration of the future plat for this site. Staff must ensure that no sign encroaches in any easement or utility spaces. No other freestanding identification signs are proposed at this time. The sign ordinance limits wall mounted signs not to exceed 15 percent of the wall area on each of its exterior walls. The Developer has indicated this building is scheduled for two separate tenants. As part of this PUD, we would request that any future wall or identification signage be consistent in scope, text size and graphics size, with allowance given for respective corporate logos or designs as an integral part of new signage. ❖ PLATTING ISSUES As indicated earlier in this report, the subject site consists of two vacant tracts of land; with one parcel 7.4 acres in size and the other approximately 1.27 acres, or an 8.67 acres of total area. The City has an agreement with the State of Minnesota/MnDOT to transfer this parcel to the City, whereby the City intends to transfer the same parcel over to RER. Upon completion of this transfer, the Developer intends to replat these two parcels into one large, single lot of record. This proposed subdivision plat is not included or made part of the considerations given to this specific PUD application, including this Development/Site and Building Plan. The Developer will need to submit separate application of this new plat in the near future. Staff is unable to provide a definite timeline or determination when this transfer of the MnDOT parcel will take place or be completed. Under this PUD approval process, City Staff has agreed (in principle) that the development of this site with the new building and portions of the parking and loading and drainage areas may take place prior to this transfer being completed, on account the new building would be situated on the former Lifetime Fitness piece of this redevelopment site, which is planned to be acquired separately by Mr. Hyde once this PUD/Site Plan entitlement process is complete. Staff is confident the City and Mr. Hyde will complete the transfer very soon; and this replatting will be made part of any PUD approvals. ❖ TRAIL ISSUES As evident in the site plan, the Developer has identified and illustrated a proposed 10-foot wide (bituminous) trail easement along the westerly edges of this site. This trail easement would accommodate the new trail alignment and connections for the Twin Lakes Regional Trail system PC 04/26/12 Page 8 of 11 in our community. As indicated in previous staff updates on this trail,the City intends to provide a more suitable trail connection from Twin Lakes Park located over 3 blocks southwest of this site, down along , north into the development site,jog along Azelia Avenue and reconnect onto the existing trail system off Azelia Avenue to the north of Lakebreeze Ave. The exact location or alignment of this trail has not been finalized or given approvals yet; however, the benefit of acquiring a trail easement is crucial in support of this trail relocation efforts by the City and Three Rivers Park District. CITY ENGINEER'S REVIEW Attached is a copy of the City Engineer's memorandum which identifies certain site design issues and conditions that must be corrected or addressed prior to issuance of any site or building development permits. Conditions required by the City Engineer should be made part of any approvals. Please note some or most of these conditions will be reviewed and approved under separate site and building permits within the project area. Other conditions or improvements may be subject to further review and approvals as part of any future platting or PUD amendments(if necessary). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission provides a recommendation to the City Council to approve Planning Commission Application No. 2012-002, which comprehends the Development/Site and Building Plan of the subject site, which is an integral part of the proposed Planned Unit Development requested of this site, subject to the following conditions: 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. The buildings are to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing systems to meet NFPA standards and connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 3. The location or placement of all fire hydrants and other fire related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief. 4. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 5. The Developer shall submit a site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure the completion of all site improvements. 6. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. PC 04/26/12 Page 9 of 11 7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Plan approval is exclusive of all final signs on this site, including any new freestanding, wall (building) signs and directional signs, which all shall remain subject to Chapter 34 of the city ordinances, and subject to separate sign permit submittals and approval. 9. B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 10. The Developer shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 11. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center current Standard Specifications and Details. 12. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City's Engineering Department and applicant shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 13. Upon the transfer of the adjacent State of Minnesota/MnDOT parcel from the City to the Developer, he shall at his earliest convenience apply for separate, and full subdivision applications consideration (preliminary plat and final plat approvals) to combine the two parcels under this PUD into one single platted lot of record. 14. The Developer shall provide and dedicate all necessary easements as required by the City Engineer, including the trail easement along the westerly boundary line, either on the new plat or by separate recordable document/agreements. 15. The Developer shall replace any existing significant trees noted to be saved on the Landscape Plans (Sheet L1.01) that may become damaged or removed as a direct result of construction on this site. 16. The Developer shall provide an identifiable, central walkway corridor in the east parking lot to accommodate pedestrians to maneuver safely through the parking lot. 17. The 8-foot high screening fence along the westerly buffer strip shall be revised to a maintenance free type material (unless recommended otherwise by the Planning Commission), and final style and located approved by the City Business and Development Director. 18. The owner of the property shall enter into an utilities and facilities maintenance agreement for maintenance and inspection of utility and storm drainage systems prior to the issuance of permits. PC 04/26/12 Page 10 of 11 19. Storm water drainage systems shall be approved by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission prior to the issuance of any permits. 20. The Developer shall provide the City with assurances that a future remediation and clean-up plan to remove hazardous substances (such as the asbestos) and semi-volatile pollutants that present a threat to public health or the environment, is acceptable with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards and all other Federal, State, and/or County agency standards prior to the issuance of building permits. 21. Approval of this Planned Unit Development acknowledges the PUD-MIXED C2/I-1 underlying zoning district as authorizing allowable used generally within this development site. This site, however, may not be used as an "adult establishment" as indicated in Section 35-330, Subdivision la, 13 of the City Code. Such uses are specifically prohibited within this Planned Unit Development. 22. The owner shall enter into a PUD Agreement and/or Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions Agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be prepared and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. Said agreement shall be filed with the title to the property and shall acknowledge the specific standards and regulations provided by the underlying PUD-MIXED C2/I-1 zoning district, as well as all other conditions of approval. This agreement shall further assure compliance with the development/site plans submitted with this application. 23. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. If the Planning Commission accepts this recommendation and the conditions listed herein, the Commission may elect to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-08, which memorializes the findings in granting said approval of this proposed Development/Site and Building Plan for the new Planned Unit the Development on the subject site, and provides o conditions of approval as they relate to this approval. Attachments 1) Location/Site Aerial Map 2) Full Site Plan Set of France Ave Business Center 4 PUD a. Survey Map b. Site Plan-Sheet Al.1 c. Floor Plan—Sheet A2.1 d. Exterior Elevations—Sheet A3.1 e. Site Cross Section—Sheet A3.2 f. Grading Plan—Sheet C 1.01 g. Utility Plan—Sheet C2.01 h. Lighting Plan—Sheet C3.01 i. Landscape Plan—Sheet L1.01 3) City Engineer's Review Memorandum—dated April 20,2012 4) Planning Commission Resolution No.2012-08 PC 04/26/12 Page 11 of 11 MEMORANDUM ATE: April D p 0, 2012 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Steven L. Lillehau g, Y g City En ineer/Director of Public Works Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor SUBJECT: Public Works Preliminary Site Plan Review—France Avenue Business Center 4 Public Works Department staff reviewed the Preliminary Site Plan submittal dated April 2, 2012, for the proposed France Avenue Business Center 4 and has the following comments: Submittal package incompleteness: 1. All comments that follow are made with the assumption that this development process will eventually proceed through the subdivision process and combine the site's two parcels into a single parcel, the second parcel being the old Denny's property that is now Mn/DOT turnback property. It is anticipated that a preliminary plat and a final plat would be evaluated and approved by the City and County prior to proceeding with an issuance of any permits for any actual construction work. Proposed property lines easements, setbacks, etc. have not been fully evaluated for these reasons;therefore,the full evaluation of these elements will take place once the preliminary plat and final plat are developed and formally submitted to the City for consideration. 2. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required. 3. A site plan is required to be submitted as part of this application and review of the PUD Site Plan (Ordinance 35-355)that includes proper dimensioning of drive aisles, parking stalls, curve radii, and other typical site plan dimensioning. This must be provided for evaluation. 4. Provide the City with an updated traffic impact and parking study for the site. Without the additional Denny's property added into the overall plat, the Developer must show an interim parking plan and proof-of-parking plan as warranted. Easements, Agreements and Plat: 5. Legal descriptions and easement vacation documents must be obtained for all existing easements. Existing public easements as determined by the City must be vacated and proposed easements must be dedicated as part of the preliminary and final platting process. 6. Provide and verify all private encumbrances and rights pertaining to those easements and other encumbrances that may be present. Verification of any proposed site elements located within any identified easement must further be evaluated and confirmed if the encroachment is allowed (e.g. proposed utilities, buildings, etc). 7. An updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Engineer and City Attorney for review at the time of the preliminary plat application (within 30 days of preliminary plat application). Additionally, this will need to stay current and be updated through the approval process as required to maintain and be current within 30 days of release of the final plat. 8. A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general Preliminary Site Plan Review Memo—France Avenue Business Center 4 Page 2 of 5 April 20, 2012 construction activities and management provisions, traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions, tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility provisions,temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non- compliance provisions. A$5,000 deposit will be required as part of the non-compliance provision. 9. A Subdivision Agreement is required that includes all conditions of the project approval, subject to the final site plan approval by the City Engineer. 10. A 10-ft drainage and utility easement must be dedicated on the plat around the entire perimeter of the site. 11. A drainage and utility easement encompassing all storm water treatment facilities must be dedicated on the plat. 12. Provide the City with a trail easement for the proposed trail.The trail must include the full width of the trail plus a minimum unencumbered area of 3-feet on each side of the trail. 13. An overall utility facilities easement agreement is required that will provide the City perpetual accessibility to all private utilities and storm drainage areas to inspect and enforce proper utility service and maintenance for the entire site. This easement agreement also includes private inspection, maintenance and reporting responsibilities and must be executed prior to issuance of building and land alteration permits. 14. The applicant is responsible for coordinating site development plans with Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, Qwest Communications and other private utility companies. Easements necessary to provide utility service to the proposed site development shall be dedicated to the public for public use with the final plat. 15. Private site appurtenances(e.g. light poles, signs, etc.) must not encroach on public easement areas. For appurtenances that provide adequate setback and will not have any direct impact on the public elements within the easement area as allowed and approved by the City will require an Encroachment Agreement. 16. The downstream private storm sewer system that outlets the proposed pond falls on Mn/DOT right-of-way. The developer must obtain the necessary permit, easement or agreement from Mn/DOT that allows this encroachment and provide a copy to the City. General Items: 17. The proposed plat is located adjacent to Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) highway right-of-way. Minnesota Statutes require that the City submit the plat to the Department of Transportation for written comments and recommendations. All Mn/DOT comments will be conditions of approval. 18. The civil plans must be certified by a licensed engineer in the state of Minnesota. 19. This development is required to be reviewed by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission. All City and Watershed storm drainage, treatment and infiltration standards are required to be met. 20. All storm drainage hydraulic and hydrology calculations pertaining to the required treatment standards must be based on the current existing conditions as it is today—not previous site conditions. The drainage plan submitted as part of this application must be revised and updated to include these current existing conditions—not previous existing conditions. Provide geotechnical soil parameters and soil infiltration rates for soils located in the immediate area of any proposed infiltration basin. These items must be provided for evaluation. Preliminary Site Plan Review Memo—France Avenue Business Center 4 Page 3 of 5 April 20, 2012 21. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City of Brooklyn Center's standard specifications and details. The City's standard details must be included in the final site plans. 22. A general project phasing and sequencing plan must be provided for the development. 23. During construction of the site improvements and until the permanent turf and plantings are established,the developer will be required to reimburse the City for the administration and engineering inspection efforts. 24. Upon project completion, the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures, and provide certified record drawings for any associated private and/or public improvements prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 25. Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer's design/project engineer. Upon project completion, the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer's immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the state of Minnesota and must certify all required as- built drawings. 26. Identify, show and label all removals on applicable plan sheets. 27. The SWPPP plan sheets must include the following: a. Interim and final Best Management Practices (BMP) devices in accordance with MPCA guidelines and requirements for the size of the site. b. Provide a detail for a rock construction entrance. c. Provide details for all SWPPP BMP devices. d. All SWPPP BMPs must be installed by the Developer and inspected by the City prior to any disturbance of the property. e. Provide and list a SWPPP inspector/manager with contact information that must be available within 4-hrs notification to respond to and implement SWPPP related corrective measures. f. All inlet protection devices must have overflow protection. g. The developer must send digital (PDF) copies of required SWPPP inspection reports to the Engineering department within 12 hours of completion of the required inspection events. h. A more detailed SWPPP is required that includes interim BMP devices and measures throughout the site including temporary sediment basins, etc. and designed to meet the MPCA NPDES permit requirements. L BMP provisions for a vehicle wash-off point must be incorporated into the plan and implemented should the City Engineer determine the necessity. j. Silt fence must be installed around the entire perimeter of the site. k. Show and label water course with flow arrows and label ultimate site discharge point(s). 1. Define and show an exclusive SWPPP containment boundary that identifies a sediment and erosion limit that must not be exceeded. If exceeded, all work will cease until corrective measures have been implemented and the issues have been remediated. m. Street sweeping must occur as needed, on a daily basis and/or as directed by the City Engineer as warranted. Preliminary Site Plan Review Memo—France Avenue Business Center 4 Page 4 of 5 April 20, 2012 n. Other details as necessary and applicable to the developer's specific site. Permitting: 28. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. 29. A City of Brooklyn Center sewer and water disconnect permit is required. 30. A City of Brooklyn Center land disturbance permit is required. 31. Minnesota Department of Health permit is required for watermain installation. 32. MPCA NPDES permit is required. 33. A MPCA sanitary sewer permit may be required. 34. A Minnesota Department of Health department permit is required for the watermain extension. 35. A Mn/DOT permit is required from the drainage division (review), for utility work and for work within Mn/DOT right-of-way. 36. Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission (SCWMC) plan review and approval are required. 37. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warranted. Sheet A2.1 Site Plan 38. The developer is required to construct a trail along the west side of Azelia Avenue that connects the regional trail along Lakebreeze Avenue to the cul-de-sac of Lakeside Avenue. The proposed trail must be at least 10' wide with a 5 foot wide boulevard and must be constructed as part of this project. 39. Designate appropriate design vehicle and provide vehicle turning movements for vehicles through the points of ingress/egress and throughout the site to/from delivery locations. 40. The entire perimeter parking and drive aisle area must be constructed with B612 curb and gutter. 41. Provide typical sections for road removals and repairs on Azelia and Lakebreeze YP P Avenues. 42. Provide concrete driveway aprons at access points to Lakebreeze Avenue(use City standard details). 43. Provide typical sections for paving, concrete work, curb and gutter, concrete aprons etc. Sheet C 1.01 Grading Plan 44. Provide a typical cross section for the infiltration basin. 45. Define the purpose and functionality of the "wet forebay"design prior to the proposed infiltration basin. 46. Provide ultimate pond emergency overflow with appropriate erosion control details. 47. Evaluate the condition of the existing wood retaining wall along Azelia Avenue and provide plans and details and for any needed replacements or improvements. 48. Provide rip rap or other appropriate erosion control element behind the curb at indicated emergency over flow locations. Sheet C2.01 Utility Plan 49. Provide large note indicating"All proposed and existing utilities contained within this site are PRIVATE". 50. All utility connections to City utilities must be inspected by City staff. Preliminary Site Plan Review Memo—France Avenue Business Center 4 Page 5 of 5 April 20, 2012 51. Install new gate valves and Packaged Magnesium Anodes at all watermain connection points. 52. Provide profile plan, profile and connection details for all proposed utility segments within public right-of-way. 53. Operation and maintenance manuals are required to be provided for all proposed, permanent storm water treatment facilities. 54. Provide pretreatment prior to all storm water treatment facilities. 55. Remove any unused existing water or sanitary services to the site at the City trunk line. 56. At the proposed wet tap location within Lakebreeze Avenue in the northeast of the site, both services and Tees in the City trunk line must be removed and replaced with new pipe and a single Tee, eliminating the need for a wet tap. 57. Provide a new Tee in lieu of the proposed wet tap for the water service located within France Avenue if the existing 6-inch water service is deficient and cannot be used. 58. Show the water connection detail (Tap or Tee) located on Azelia Lane. 59. Provide details and confirm that a utility conflict check for all water/sewer crossings has been performed. 60. Maintain a minimum of 18"of clearance between the watermain and any sewer at all crossings. 61. Provide plan and details for pond skimming device at outlet of pond. 62. The downstream private storm sewer system that outlets the proposed pond discharges onto Mn/DOT right-of-way.The Developer must confirm with Mn/DOT and provide confirmation of approval to the City that the downstream system is capable of accepting this discharge and is allowable by Mn/DOT. Sheet L1.01 Landscape Plan 63. Provide irrigation for the entire site. 64. Provide and show plan details and locations for tree protection. All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. The Preliminary Site Plan must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions above. Subsequent approval of the preliminary plat, final plat and final site plans may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading and geometric design as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-08 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-002 SUBMITTED BY PAUL HYDE OF REAL ESTATE RECYCLING, LLC, FOR APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT/SITE AND BUILDING PLAN IN RELATION TO THE NEW PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON THE SUBJECT SITE IDENTIFIED AS 4001 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012-002 submitted by Paul Hyde, on behalf of Real Estate Recycling, LLC proposes rezoning a 7.39 acre site located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North, along with the 1.27 acre MnDOT excess right-of-way parcel adjacent to and immediately east of the subject property (collectively identified as the "Subject Site"), from C2 (Commerce) to a new PUD-Mixed C2/I-1 (Planned Unit Development — Mixed Commerce and Industrial Park), and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends the rezoning of the above mentioned property to facilitate the planned and future redevelopment of the Subject Site with a new 90,000 sq. ft. office/industrial/warehouse facility on said site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on April 12, 2012, whereby a planning staff report was presented and public testimony regarding the PUD- Mixed rezoning and a preliminary or concept development plan were received and reviewed, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the rezoning request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezoning contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the C2 (Commerce) and I-1 (Industrial Park) Zoning District standards contained in Sections 35-322 and 35-330 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, and the City's Comprehensive Plan, and subsequently adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-04 which provided a favorable recommendation to this PUD rezoning only, and elected to table consideration of the final Development/Site and Building Plan to the April 26, 2012 meeting; and WHEREAS, on Apri l 26, 2012, the Planning Commission reconsidered the same Application No. 2012-002, and reviewed and received a planning report on the proposed new Development/Site and Building Plans, in conjunction with the proposed new Planned Unit Development of the Subject Site, which plan provides for the construction of a new 90,000 sq. ft. office/manufacturing/warehouse facility, parking lot and truck court loading area, along with site lighting, landscaping and screening measures; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Development/Site and Building plans are consistent with the General Development Plans of the overall France Avenue PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-08 Business Center 4 Planned Unit Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that the Development/Site and Building Plan element of the proposed Planned Unit Development submitted under Application No. 2012-02 by Paul Hyde of Real Estate Recycling, LLC, be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The Development/Site and Building Plan is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance; 2. The Development/Site and Building Plan, in relation to the Planned Unit Development proposed on the Subject Site, will facilitate the redevelopment and improvement of this site, will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land; 3. The improvements and utilization of the property as proposed under the planned redevelopment of this site is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with ordinance standards, in particular the incorporation of the 100 ft. and 50 ft. buffer requirements where commercial/industrial uses abut residential zoned property at a property line and a street line respectively; 4. The Development/Site and Building Plan proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city; 5. The Development/Site and Building Plan proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this proposed development can be considered an asset to the community; and 6. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating and approving a Site and Building Plan as contained in Section 35-230 (Plan Approval) and a Development Plan as contained in Section 35-355 (Planned Unit Development) of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the site proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2012-002 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2 of 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-08 2. The buildings are to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing systems to meet NFPA standards and connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 3. The location or placement of all fire hydrants and other fire related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief. 4. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 5. The Developer shall submit a site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure the completion of all site improvements. 6. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Plan approval is exclusive of all final signs on this site, including any new freestanding, wall (building) signs and directional signs, which all shall remain subject to Chapter 34 of the city ordinances, and subject to separate sign permit submittals and approval. 9. B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 10. The Developer shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 11. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center current Standard Specifications and Details. 12. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City's Engineering Department and applicant shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 13. Upon the transfer of the adjacent State of Minnesota/MnDOT parcel from the City to the Developer, he shall at his earliest convenience apply for separate and full subdivision applications consideration (preliminary plat and final plat approvals) to combine the two parcels under this PUD into one single platted lot of record. 3 of 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-08 14. The Developer shall provide and dedicate all necessary easements as required by the City Engineer, including the trail easement along the westerly boundary line, either on the new plat or by separate recordable document/agreements. 15. The Developer shall replace any existing significant trees noted to be saved on the Landscape Plans (Sheet L1.01) that may become damaged or removed as a direct result of construction on this site. 16. The Developer shall provide an identifiable, central walkway corridor in the east parking lot to accommodate pedestrians to maneuver safely through the parking lot. 17. The 8-foot high screening fence along the westerly buffer strip shall be revised to a maintenance free type material (unless recommended otherwise by the Planning Commission), and final style and located approved by the City Business and Development Director. 18. The owner of the property shall enter into an utilities and facilities maintenance agreement for maintenance and inspection of utility and storm drainage systems prior to the issuance of permits. 19. Storm water drainage systems shall be approved by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission prior to the issuance of any permits. 20. The Developer shall provide the City with assurances that a future remediation and clean-up plan to remove hazardous substances (such as the asbestos) and semi-volatile pollutants that present a threat to public health or the environment, is acceptable with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards and all other Federal, State, and/or County agency standards prior to the issuance of building permits. 21. Approval of this Planned Unit Development acknowledges the PUD-MIXED C2/I-1 underlying zoning district as authorizing allowable used generally within this development site. This site, however, may not be used as an "adult establishment" as indicated in Section 35-330, Subdivision la, 13 of the City Code. Such uses are specifically prohibited within this Planned Unit Development. 22. The owner shall enter into a PUD Agreement and/or Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions Agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be prepared and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. Said agreement shall be filed with the title to the property and shall acknowledge the specific standards and regulations provided by the underlying PUD-MIXED C2/1-1 zoning district, as well as all other conditions of approval. This agreement shall further assure compliance with the development/site plans submitted with this application. 4of5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-08 23. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. April 26, 2012 Date Chair ATTEST: Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Chair, Commissioners and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 5 of 5 City of Brooklyn Center Section 35-322. C2 COMMERCE DISTRICT. 1. Permitted Uses a. The retail sale of food. b. Eating establishments, provided they do not offer live entertainment and further provided that the category does not permit drive-in. eating places and convenience-food restaurants. c. The following uses: 1) The retail sale of heating and plumbing equipment, paint, glass, and wallpaper, electrical supplies, and building supplies. 2) The retail sale of tires, batteries and automobile accessories and marine craft accessories. 3) The retail sales of apparel and related accessories. 4) The retail sale of furniture, home furnishings and related equipment. 5) The retail sale of miscellaneous items such as the following: Drugs and proprietary items Liquors Antiques and secondhand merchandise Books and stationery Garden supplies Jewelry Flowers and floral accessories Cigars and cigarettes Newspapers and magazines Cameras and photographic supplies Gifts, novelties and souvenirs Pets Optical goods Sporting goods and bicycles d. Service/office uses described in Subsection 1(b) through I(u), Subsection I(w), and Subsection 3(c) of Section 35-320. e. The following repair/service uses: 1) Electrical repair service shops. City of Brooklyn Center City Ordinance City of Brooklyn Center 2) Household appliances, electrical supplies, heating and plumbing equipment. 3) Radio and television repair service shops. 4) Watch, clock and jewelry repair service shops. 5) Reupholstery and furniture repair shops. 6) Laundering, dry cleaning and dyeing. 7) Equipment rental and leasing services. f. The following medical and health uses: 1) Hospitals, not including animal hospitals. 2) Medical laboratories. 3) Dental laboratories. 4) Nursing care homes, (at not more than 50 beds per acre), provided that these institutions shall where required by state law, or regulation or by municipal ordinance, be licensed by the appropriate state or municipal authority. g. The following contract/construction uses: 1) Building construction contractors' offices. 2) Plumbing, heating and air conditioning contractors' offices. 3) Painting, paper hanging and decorating contractors'offices. 4) Masonry, stone work, tile setting and plastering contractors' offices. 5) Carpentering and wood flooring contractors'offices. 6) Roofing and sheet metal contractors'offices. 7) Concrete contractors'offices. 8) Water well drilling contractors' offices. h. Nonresidential educational uses including Area Learning Centers (ALC), City of Brooklyn Center City Ordinance City of Brooklyn Center post secondary schools, business schools, trade schools and the like, but excluding public and private elementary and secondary schools (K-12). i. Accessory uses, incidental to the foregoing principal uses when located on the same property with the use to which it is accessory. Such accessory uses to include but not be restricted to the following: 1) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading. 2) Signs as permitted in the Brooklyn Center Sign Ordinance. 3) Outside display and sale of merchandise provided that an administrative permit is first obtained pursuant to Section 35-800 of these ordinances. j. Other uses similar in nature to the aforementioned uses, as determined by the City Council. k. Drop-in child care centers licensed by the Minnesota Department of Public Welfare pursuant to a valid license application, provided that a copy of said license and application shall be submitted annually to the City. 2. Special Requirements a. See Section 35-412 of these ordinances. 3. Special Uses a. Gasoline service stations (see Section 35-414), motor vehicle repair and auto washes provided they do not abut an R1, R2, or R3 district, including abutment at a street line; trailer rental in conjunction with these uses, provided that there is adequate trailer parking space. b. The sale or vending at gasoline service stations of items other than fuels, lubricants or automotive parts and accessories (and other than the vending of soft drinks, candy, cigarettes and other incidental items for the convenience of customers within the principal building) provided adequate parking is available consistent with the Section 35-704, 2 (b) and 2 (c). C. Drive-in eating establishments and convenience-food restaurants provided they do not abut an R1, R2, or R3 district including abutment at a street line. (However, convenience food restaurants without drive-up facilities and located within the principal structure of a shopping center of over 250,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area shall be considered a permitted use.) City of Brooklyn Center City Ordinance City of Brooklyn Center d. Eating establishments offering live entertainment; recreation and amusement places such as motion picture theaters and legitimate theater; sports arenas, bowl ing a ll eys, skating rinks and gy mnasiums all provided they do not abut an R1, R2, or R3 district, including abutment at a street line. e. The sale of motor vehicles at retail provided the use is conducted on at least a three (3) acre parcel of land containing a structure or structures occupying a minimum of fifteen percent(15%) of said parcel of land. f. The out-of-door display and sale of marine craft at retail. g. Transient lodging. h. Animal hospitals. i. Public transportation terminals (excluding truck terminals). j. Clubrooms and lodges. k. Accessory off-site parking not located on the same property with the principal use, subject to the provisions of Section 35-701. 1. Sauna establishments and massage establishments, provided they do not abut any residential (RI through R7) district, including abutment at a street line. M. School bus garage facilities provided all storage, including vehicles, and minor servicing and minor repair shall be conducted wholly within an enclosed building and further provided it does not abut any residential (R1 through 117) districts, including abutment at a street line. n. Amusement centers provided the property on which the amusement center is to be located is not within 150 feet of any residentially zoned (R1 through R7) property. o. Automobile and truck rental and leasing. P. Tennis clubs, racket and swim clubs and other athletic clubs, health spas and suntan studios. q. Group day care facilities provided that such developments, in each specific case, are demonstrated to be: 1) Compatible with existing adjacent land uses as well as with those uses permitted in the C2 district generally. City of Brooklyn Center City Ordinance City of Brooklyn Center 2) Complementary to existing adjacent land uses as well as with those uses permitted in the C2 district generally. 3) Of comparable intensity to permitted C2 district land uses with respect to activity levels. 4) Planned and designed to assure that generated traffic will be within the capacity of available public facilities and will not have an adverse impact upon those facilities, the immediate neighborhood, or the community. 5) Traffic generated by other uses on the site will not pose a danger to children served by the day care use. Furthermore, group day care facilities shall be subject to the special requirements set forth in Section 35-412. City of Brooklyn Center City Ordinance Section 35-330. I-1 INDUSTRIAL PARK. 1. Permitted Uses a. The following manufacturing activities: 1) Food and kindred products as illustrated by: Dairy products Bakery products Confectionery and related products Beverages, including beer, wine, and distilled alcohol Macaroni, spaghetti, and noodles 2) Apparel and other finished products made from fabrics, leather, and similar materials. 3) Lumber and wood products, except saw mills and planing mills producing a dimensioned lumber. 4) Furniture and fixtures. 5) Converted paper and paperboard products (as opposed to paper and paperboard manufacturing). 6) Printing and publishing and allied industries. 7) Chemicals and allied products as follows: Drugs Soaps, detergents and cleaning preparations Perfumes, cosmetics and other toilet preparations (compounding and packaging only) 8) Miscellaneous plastic products. 9) Fabricated metal products as illustrated by: Office computing and accounting machines Household appliances Electrical lighting and wiring equipment Communication equipment, including radio and television receiving sets Electronic components and accessories Screw machine products City of Brooklyn Center City Ordinance 10) Professional, scientific, electronic and controlling instruments, photographic and optical goods, watches and clocks. 11) Miscellaneous manufacturing such as jewelry and silverware, musical instruments and parts, toys, amusement, sporting and athletic goods and pens, pencils and other office and artistic material 12) Assembly of electric powered vehicles. 13) Adult establishments. b. The following wholesale trade activities: 1) Automotive equipment 2) Drugs, chemicals and allied products 3) Dry goods and apparel 4) Groceries and related products 5) Electrical goods 6) Hardware, plumbing, heating equipment and supplies 7) Machinery, equipment and supplies 8) Other wholesale trade similar in nature to the aforementioned uses such as paper and paper products, furniture, and home furnishings, and beer, wine and distilled alcoholic beverages, but expressly excluding petroleum bulk stations and scrap and waste materials and similar uses. C. The following service activities: 1) Laundrying, dry cleaning and dyeing 2) Contract construction 3) Kennels 4) Veterinarian and animal hospitals d. Public transportation terminals (excluding truck terminals). e. Accessory uses incidental to the foregoing principal uses when located on the same property with the use to which it is accessory. Such accessory uses to City of Brooklyn Center City Ordinance include without being restricted to the following: 1) Offstreet parking and offstreet loading. 2) Signs as permitted in the Brooklyn Center Sign Ordinance. 3) Storage of raw materials, work in process and inventory, provided such storage is within completely enclosed buildings. f. Other uses similar in nature to the aforementioned uses, as determined by the City Council. 2. Special Requirements a. See Section 35-413 of these ordinances. 3. Special Uses a. Foundries, provided that the foundry operation is a necessary incident to a principal use permitted in the I-1 district. b. Textile mills. C. Retail sales of products manufactured, processed, warehoused, or wholesaled on the use site. d. Accessory off-site parking not located on the same property with the principal use, subject to the provisions of Section 35-701. e. Those commercial developments which, in each specific case, are demonstrated to the City Council to be: 1) Compatible with existing adjacent land uses as well as with those uses permitted in the 1-1 district generally. 2) Complementary to existing adjacent land uses as well as to those uses permitted in the I-1 district generally. 3) Of comparable intensity to permitted 1-1 district land uses with respect to activity levels. 4) Planned and designed to assure that generated traffic will be within the capacity of available public facilities and will not have an adverse impact upon the industrial park or the community. and, which are described in Section 35-322, Subsection 1 d, a (subparts 1- City of Brooklyn Center City Ordinance 6), f, (subparts 2 and 3), g through j; 3 in and 3 p. Such commercial developments shall be subject to I-1 district requirements of Section 35- 400 and 35-413 and shall otherwise be subject to the ordinance requirements of the use classification which the proposed development represents. g. Warehousing and storage uses which, in each specific case, are demonstrated to the City Council to be: 1) Compatible with existing adjacent land uses as well as with those uses permitted in the I-1 district generally. 2) Of comparable intensity to permitted 1-1 district land uses with respect to activity levels. provided such uses shall adhere to applicable requirements in the I-1 district and shall not involve maintenance or servicing of vehicles on the site. h. Other noncommercial uses required for the public welfare as determined by the Council, including accessory outside storage of materials when screened from public view by an opaque wall. City of Brooklyn Center City Ordinance _._ AW s.. Jill , µ � • S01 - T r ♦ +¢, mo 1��l7� 1 100 • T w'• - ._ •t, `` %�- ' ';��' ,`.� 11x3"�•" / W S _ •j M li�''�.ro1�._ - Wit... � - 4� / Q} = Phase II (Toro/Baker Furn.) s ,i M lei Phase III 'h ate= < (Caribou Coffee) i it WS gists i aa ( ��� • r f f!f 1. 1 i alial_9 (7 ya4 1 al•i�lj;l; 1!�. 3 � � ,'� '""�4 e Et'� �. �.a •�'r'�'"�`.t+�e r = 9 ( 4 1 a;A la�tg 1�4i ��',.IAa11P , ,/ "' �� � � �� '.SAKE BREEZE AVE _ � ;r.,. � : ,q1, ,,a,l,;q,,. '•,�R' - -_: ��_. ;- :� • � •• '' ;��'} ! 100 I Witt .. MnDOT Parcel _44 gill! •_ former Northwest Athletic Club / PROPERTY INFO y` r Site AREA: Northwest Athletic Parcel = 7.4 acres t MnDOT (excess) Parcel = 1.27 acres e ,. ZONING: C-2 Commerce ADDRESS: 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North Q� PARCEL 1: r- w wAwACT s unary I-rAS I Lot 1, Block 1 Tennis Acres Two,Hennepin County,Minnesota. xW ac.xa 7rl»e xr all IR/ 2.39 A=86 C.B. avT.IDit '$E-NW INV.-856.5 (Torrens property. Certificate of Title No. 1186947) Irfi.b S INV.-B58.B -�A -1� - - - - - - --- � _22, J PARCEL 2• and Parcel 2: I I, / Restrictlo s�recoardedoas Document Numbber 5353238 oa amended by Joslyn e CorrrrectlVe i________V_. _\ '--------------------------- Declaration recorded as Document Number 6708468; and as further amended b the I I - Amendment to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions recorded as Document Number�I 1 _ i -I ��,y""" A�`a.II�II1 I 3Iv;IIn ,IL I I I I I I I I{.1II 7194299,all In the office of Count Recorder, III �i I pRdr hi it. l� �1-1.kil 111+4 SRAJLS I I I I �IJ*�, K�iGl 4(aLLS Hennepin County,Minnesota. y r . ,I I I I I I I PM►+ �1 i-®wmr Aso aAeaw AamewT_�' (Abstract property) rl I �___I"____ ran ooc.xa e z - I'1 `.n 1 n G-T S I / Legal description taken from First American Title Insurance Company file no. 1fi y\ I JAI. _ g 6 KI a ;� ;v NCS-492496-MPLS, effective dole June 8, 2011. 6 P N , v s.5I ' I III e. p1,1.or pore a DA 6 _ STATEMENT OF ENCROACHMENTS: RTk1�659.09 _ ( �i SEwm uWZOrT / IL^-�8 SIDEWAL/(AND iRNI EASFr1/ERI DoG xq.SwzT,x ®qnp alm9 v moor most wntMY WapolY INe(Ownerehlp PER DOG.N0.7603620---. Ja ,^ / known) (shmm RaldnNq wall encroaches ante the d aMOge and uIYItY sawnwte ®e E aoachmmt of pmmg onto the Wing wlbaak INes. 6G Tom, _ _60 -jam ` +-0I v wmr uo nuawc A KNT Nots: There h enw9h wan to m lM property to comply with the V 01 1 , 16 '(` ,y TT T``\ xo ixTOti wtback fh-t I-Ii,q army parking wocea the pmkinq cwld b,moved fipv,�j 1.1,o LOT 2 0.0Lx I.I-Aw DAV[s�IkO to a nec«say N«ax to oomph with Inc setback pMY A-®a0fiwwc rASEWfixT wc.1 \ N' ®A potion o/the eyed enovmbe.ea by the appurtenant parking �_ L� i� 1 5.LINE i•Dal 1, 0.SLOt7A C.B �� wl tlaMbso N Porch 2 le antler con,t-thn and no pmkinq ii�xB63.9`p¢ � POINT•A-"RIN�866.8] �p poplisban of consorts cub Ilse weslMy of proprty Line. NN • •T l / 6>G" ""' @__�{_1 C.B. 853.5801 ( ® -RIM-B67.IJ -'-'RIN.il69.8] ^ - 3p-) Y //ITI\ 4.620 / V.-86{JL-: 2`3- GENERAL NOTES: Ip�TT. mu:aiD-- 1.The b-Ing system used h o.slrmaL ]0,820 NW INV.-863.6 Lx 1 \ 6.610$ // 2 The location of Us undrground ullltise Mown hraan,If any,ore approximate only.PURSUANT TO MSA ' 1\I \ / \_ NE INV.-866.! • ^ .63g IN 2180 CONTACT GOPHER STALE ONE CALL AT(812)151-0002 PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. t Q__ F yo l RIM-859.10 1 q�4 /TII ge\ 1 q �O /� 72•.�G �J> > C.B. 3.6ubYel praprly ie 1ifed ow being N'Zane X aMr Areoi rn Flood Inevma Rate Mop Na, TDRM M.H.INV.-856.1 .7 p 2]053CO212E,e8seliw cart.5wtwnbr 2,2001. M-85].71 I RN-88z,.FB 8g.59C 15 / UT d) INV.863.4 -W INV.-653.] INV-859.8�B, 1 8]f 3B - / O J 4.The ihi-yar.es not V.Ad d with zoning Nformotian punumt to Table A Item 6a v 6b. WINV.-1.1 �'/ °J, / D 50 25 O 50 100 ISO a I I /II y/ ' 1 +j( \\� 94/ O_ / ^5!L 5.Site area-321,466 so.I a feet-7.39 acres. � 4 6.Pvcd 1: Thre ore a told of 0 striped parking stalls m wW property,of which there we 0 dnlgmted >)• '1 y If1'" B55.7>?\ \ \ SCALE IN FEET a hmrdl.w. 1 ^ SCALE: 1 INCH = 5D FEET eared 2: tar•me p cold or 167.wow pwkNg.ml.an.dal praprtr,or.nk+1 lily.>.z d«lylalw 1 ` Pr . ♦\\\\ as hondla \\\�I 3.73c 7.All fled m.owr.,Iwts matMw recorded dimensions wlthN the mecbMtn req kwmts of ALTA/AGSM C.B. we-I6catlmW RTM-8]3.93 1 \ VK\\ {.a INV.-881.7 &Thh wrwy was meds an Ns ground and N accedance wHh the MNMum Standard DatM RsprV.menh Fs"I uimb u ✓�rn[,:: g 5� `\\ Yulf-'../ y� �, r9J�1r{ B63.SX �jJ \ \\py 1 1 1\I�p i YJ far Land mile SurroH as adwtw by ALTA m0 AGSM. a r x665.. \1 1 1 11\i 1. 1 I 9.Im preparing uh zones I no.e relied floe,the wppprt y. i,*K; is and the ate of A,—for 11 hwrann iesued by riot AmMoon net.Nwrcnn company.hi,*K;l an d to kc altar of AIdI If zou ana e66�(\\\ 11 ,675.56 bead. me mumbr NCS-492496-MPLS Thh N-IUees but h mat limited to I«mNg one IeennfyNq '%b q� J / ) I __HIGHWAY ENTRANCE RAMP receded desmiptlan.(a.a.Property and wsement des,ripums). OWNER:PUBLIC Is HQT'OF Y 4fJ J / �� (/' // 10.EI-tim datum h based m data obtoMw hom the WOOL __ ) / Bancnmark:MNDOT G51D Station 1 81612.The berchmork b a manumwt m brides dwMent SE camx of ° J I Ij%// 739 NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B: Eran.1A,. cratearon Highway 2-ISWtear. \ 1 4# �Yr: ?C 1 / Tap m klmo,Is op of .located • shown ♦ .alt D >(e qP \ 16 w ((/( Hswitionman_tap or nal Located es shown m wrwy. c.a. °�( \ /11/ .n ®Ea..mwls far baNag.me ulMly purposes es.howm an en.rxetled plat o/Tennh Ames Bewl'wn-BB20D ry ♦♦ �` RTU-a6T.-'3 1 'o //llj A r prod as Donm.nt No.1584714 N me orrice of the Rwl.bu of nue>(As to Parcd 1). INY.-858.2 1 �e ¢"- ;\� 72. As 91oWN ON SURVEY \\�♦ \\ lot 1 '1S( .29 tQi Easement.for dolmig.mtl utility Purposes as•mown an the recoraw plot of Doh and D.vies ♦ I 1 \' /� L_n x863` d Addtlan os shown by recital the certifioate of title,per-O"y wooted o.e.ldmcsd by the P'1 'P Ordinance renrded Nowmbr 1,1990 m Dxument No.2134073 h the am.of the Registrar of \ ♦♦ I 1 i( \ '653.5x Titles;and aho by the Ordinance,rwaded December 19,2005 as Dxument No.2144804 N the \ I I 1yI1 a / 1 0 office of N.Rieghhv of Titles.(As to Pmod 1).DEDICATED AND REDEDICATED EASEMENTS ARE ,gry \ ` 1 1 1 1 I' ♦yy 1 / r ��0 SHOWN ON SURVEY(as to Parcel 1) i \♦ \ Ih L L %'^O '+• / l 0 V Eawnwts for dr, "me unity purposes as shown m the warded plat of Dole and DoNes M11E"� 1 d Addition.WIWI,`-bled by the Brookl,.Center City C-riol as V4...d by the OrdNmce No.9918,wopled Water 11,1999,r.00raea November 5,1999 as D--t N.7211399 In the of6q of the Comly Receder.(As to Parcd 2).AS SHOWN ON SURVEY --I'\U B E L for boN d v191t Mown m Ne rwvdsd t of Jod Second 15 ® aW a y Wrpasee w pia rn .Iyq`�11�g4ry'�93.9�l• / S Awilbn racvtled orioles 5.2000 n Dowrrwlt No.738{325 N Ms office of the County 159.38 I ( '%\-)I I F mp9aW° P�� 'f' 1 5l ELEY-857.1 Recorder.(AS to Parcel 2).AS SHOWN ON SURVEY a 853.9 1 / / ,5 1*5.3x/ GE J,F, halmL�it.I-of aa.ess to Stale Highway No.100....red by and N fever of the State of U POWER k1F la w set forth In ln.Md Crtlneot.,dales Nowmbr 22,1954,re-oded 4vM 3,1955 / ce Do art No.2929196 M Book 2035 of Deed.,page 7 N the office of the County Recorder, ALTA LAND TITLE SURVEY Z PDLE d shown by recital m the certificate of title.(As to all Pmc H).RIGHT OF WAY UNE DESCRIBED // ( // / \\ i•/ S SHOWN ON SURVEY. y ,q°I 79'r� Y ®Trms.-anditian..wed-I.resb;ctiana ab6wtNna provision.and man-..-k,.iw, for: �.� y f( jr- t - , r enb contained N Me Easement Agr-.t for Entry and PakNq,datW 0claber 26.1987, w -\ 5 ecorded No embe,16,1987, Do tat No.5347022 N the office of the County Recan r.(As e EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC LINES PER to Parcel 2).AVAILABLE PAR NG SHOWN GN SURVEY. REAL ESTATE RECYCLING O 'f 659 / k0 DOC.NO.3671709 a T4753172 B 0 Terms,conditions,covenant cacti me,obfigatlons,moValons and non-exckrdw te I Wined N m.E en Agresmeot for Side.alk/Tr.l Mdnt.nonn and uabmty, SITE:4001 LAKE BREEZE AVENUE NORTH aatw Apd S. May 3.1988,ors Document No.54D2735 N the oMn of the Comity / '•,l R Recardw.(As to ra v.SHOWN ON SURVEY. BROOKLYN CENTER,MINNESOTA Easement sanilyY wed Litt station purposes,logeNr wiN any NuMntd rights,N beds / b l the City r Center,m canlaNed N 9,.Easement Cram and MoNlwmcs Agreement. O� a J•h 0 &°pled ,198&r died May 3.1998 es Do-ument No.5402736 N the office of the County 1_ ,10 �.00 .(As to Pvcd 2).SHOWN ON SURVEY. p J LEGEND beement far street purposes,togethr w1th an Noldentd rights,N rows of the Gtrr of �Q r Cmlw,es cantIkk N the A sna Street Easement Agreement.doled August 2).2002. �� • Property Monument Poic'ed Augrrst 2&2002 es Do-ument No.7803420 N the office of the County Recvdr.(N to -- - Overhead Electric Pvcd 2).SHOWN ON SURVEY. Q• �+ Underground Electric e� --"'- Sonitary$ewer If >9 Trms,cmdll-. I--nts,restrictions,obligations and vovhlans contained N the -' ---'- Water admotion of Covenants and Restrictions,doled Npnmber 23,1987,recorded Die-embr 2 1987, Z as Dowm Tit No.5353238 N the office of the County Recorder,as amended by ins Carrwtlw O Underground Telephone Dedoratlon,dated Mwch 6,1967,receded Meoh 11,1997 as Dowm-t No.6708466 N the Mee of the County Rscadr:as amended by the Amendment to Decimation of Cownanls and OV Q 4 Fence Rselrkllans acted/`gust 17,1999,recorded Oclaber 7,1999-Document No.7194299 N the F --- - F.Mc Setbo Line office or the County Rscordr:es hlrthr omimded by the Amended Convent of Ownr of (on r\/ Ben efited Parcel,doted October 28,1999,recorded May 31.2000 m Document No.7304403 N • Catchb the ofe"of The County Reccin r.These docvnents we not mammidhw m the-wtl8cote of W W ® Catchb flue.(As to dl Parcels).SHOWN ON SURVEY. Z.r e San' y Monhole Eaewnenl a aceses W poses,togaAw.IN TRY Neaenld ghts,N beds of the City of CERTIFICATION: �p z To RER AoWlsitiorw ILC;LTF Red Estate Compmy,Inc and Mt Amwlam Mile 6 arm Manhole �-Wr ants,as cantaNed N the Agr-wit for MoNtenance and Inspection of uuny and Insurance compmy, W m Telephone Monhole Storm 8:DrcNage Systems,dated October 20.2000,recorded Nowmbr 7.2000 es Document No. Telephone Box ]3800]6 N the office of the County Recorder.(As to Parcel 2).PROPERTY DESCRIBED SHOWN ON This h to certify that tills map or pint and me eurwy m whic,It is blew wade made SURVEY AS AREA N.OF LAKERREEZE AVE N LOT 1,BLOCK 1,JOSLYN 2ND ADD. N o-cedmce with the 2011-en-Stmdea Delos R I , 4 Light Pole LTA r-a S Se ALTA/AGSM % `Tsar_ - _. � lane nn.svrww.NNnr eslabll.ned and aaanted br ALTA and NsPS.me Nduaes _��rile LAKE BREEZE AVE.N OpusAEGroup,Inc. Nypp pyp MONUMENT ENT SM(10'-0'L.W-O'N) EIIISIIND CURB CUT I �/ \I/ ♦ II b��. la MEIN � 18 + \ REMOVED P SIYRIICRaN z ' CONCRETE BLE VERIFY LOG1110N PROPERiT RIj I ; SEE RAT SEISUCK DRIVE IN DOORS IW B ° Io to \ lid 1 T s s ACE BUFFER ""0 B'R"L PROPOSED OFFICE If WAREHOUSE 90,000 sq.ft GROSS AREA < ° ' TRUCK COURT Is I / • / —CE — CE I --.ER 10 VER-LO GON LARGE L POWER POLE �O 1� / RETENTION POND • '� �P�� �� REEER ro CARL 4N0 WIOSCAPE 5 OD-31-2012 OIIY SRE REVIEW R.wS _ I6 DRIVE IN DOORS I i LARGE 30211100 POWER POLE 03-21-2012 RN.aR Yx•V.w N L DUW4 W SITE PLAN G_IN G. SCJYE 1•�YY-0• G.HAWKINS/J.MAGNUSON •E——oc in NN Irn•meai.n o aslm•c Bn lle ape c•noNw m iM SITE DATA NOTE e:o"w a`n:'YxiN p" d tlx nl.mgtion.onlo+NL w.lectroni ZONING: C-2.REEpIE 9R R11-1 UO TVON OE ROOFTOP YECNANII EQUIPMENT ro BE DEIERYINED AS TEWT SPACET ARE LEASED. .F]•clrvric INe mry mt.ccuroNy MNC1 CONSTRUCTION TYPE. 1-0 tb Dn•I.•-Lwit cP�wai.n•.Il i•lb ALL TRASH COUE"ON TO SE INSIDE a BUILDNC. NO r•q. Wiib.,tn.—to. Wy dl OCCUPANCY CLASS: OFFICE BB.SA ERNSE BDI E%FERIOR TRASH ENCLGSURE ALL DE PRDWDED. ,m„t•iimmm,—and Otnm—t. NO FNNISO SRiS.P110NE BOORS.ON NBX PWUS SITE AREA,- TDD. ARE"No •1Ni•Yocum•n/moy not b u••E a ..Pw.itNwt pNx Witten c—I, THERE RILL BE NO S1R11CNRE ENCN—VENTS(INCLINING O d^V'N—V BUILDING AREA: w.OW SF. ARE.—n.BN.CORIES.DOOR SYANGS.ETC.)1N W MOW OF RAr. I STA ARG SR(ASw SsJ OWED NO DEVELOPED BY: PARKING REQUIREMENTS: S AIIIA'u. v TIIEEF WLl BE NO VIE WAL15,SCIaEO15.OR FExcES IE./FNOVSE MFA: =(MSOO U.) ,OF SULDING-MOUNTED LION N RES.SEE ELEVATIONS NID n.veoo U.IN CRIC3 OF NAM ss. s rt nNwc ruN Mil Recycling ID'O'L ADMI IN PARKING PROVIDED: swe"STNLS 0'-0•A IC'-o f. 25• CPE EXCHFWGE 26083,LLC IItlDL'N ALr,LS]HF SDLLB: S .1 wv1 -a PRaaF a PNLVC o no.� DYL F 210 FRANCE AVENUE BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: BUSINESS 24._6. 166'-J• 46'-0• rscc6�wwov 1•M6UUiE0 V51pw/fiPMDREL PaN1FD M$BUTEp PREUSf COtKIiE1E I I n1ENNa1T BROKEN 116WG1�AIUM. I Nal Pa1EL5 I I I I I I I a, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I MECHANICAL I I PREE KID YETµUMMp I PREHwSNED wETAt UPNMO &ELECTRICAL ACTNG OOOR6 0.C11NC ORA'E-W DOORS I I I I I 0J-21-2012 cKr sin:RINMll I I I I 5 ' L. I ElFCiRiGL vaNrEp wEra.sr.rtJ I 1PnK5EORwER 494'-0" VERIfY LOCAnON I I I I I G H J K L M N omo�w.an 70241 70241100 un 03-21-2012 Nmtl...Rmi L DUM G.RAWK Z �1 FLOOR PLAN G. AWI(INS SCIME 1/le• Y-0• G.HAWKINS/J.MAGNUSON •Epon,.p,aov b In<Irn.-�:.n a wmmc as nN 0aR.-..l,.,w m ea 1 Pemd1.tv or.cbm.,dmp.ge.w .ap.�N.,vr..•4 d s,.�Rwuwb.e uw Gov cp.b�.d�aen,.eic •w.•>r;..N..*s;.w.crnK•y wncl aa��i2 a u•.°2_, w.ppelw�. •Tni.dx—1 m rol copied.it—pia-itI---t. m a d6ne v�..a oNrKn as rcvaovm R�Fscare Recycling CPE EXCHANGE 26083,LLC v.un FRANCE AVENUE BUSINESS RES.SEE UGHTING H L�IN­ONFIN.7-T -- B PI-AN T T (E,.F.S) T T L L= +11'YI-AlPIAPET ❑ 0 0 NSUUff NORETE 7' 1 1 j 01 IRS IS 'Nism) I S­MD ThToT5CN CUSS IN INI ID AN IIZED I­T EIRAIL.1 "0", '�'l I ILL A------FIE NEN CANING I'------------------------------------------- ---------- "N5IJUkTIED TINTED SMDRR�S IN PREFINISHED ANO ZED ALUM.TAMIA- BROKEN FRANINC �,NORTH ELEVATION Es sm ELECTRICAL"LAN T-1--:1—C.DRAINS _14TE110111"TAREAT T T T T P,INTED I Su-D—ASf' IR I ORZ.EAIDS 100-0 --------------- ____________J r --------- ------------- - _PWRED CONCRETE WALL TI NO DOORS DELON DOCK DOOR AREAS 'ANTED PETAL STARS �,SOUTH ELEVATION &'RANE PANTED INSUITED"RECAS'coNLFEIE WALL PANELS(sNoo.n—) N­_ T—E TN T OJ-Z1-201]COV SITE REVIEW ❑ ❑ WALL IN 77 1111-1-1, RA(:o-$m) I I TED Z.3ANDS cI BUM -W SYNTHETIC STUCCO --------------------------- --------------------------- ROOR a. I LO CORNICE WEST ELEVATION 11-ILl2—ol2 REVERSE L DIMAS INS, PANIT Co"' "'E" G _RAWKINS 1/2-DEEP MR ACCENT SQUARE q> G.RAWKINS/J.NAGNUSDN T.O.AcC-4, E­ "ANTED NSu0`TED'RECAST CONCRETE N Op, rot EL 12a-0 NNL (sm— A-) .a ft 2 wY chime,Eomo9n or P.— 0 ON final Ps-Cull cnnCitionv.t iv U.. IE u,. —ty a T.O. MCMICA,"LAN' .- - k TEE-4,—E.—T teJ 1O2'-a' nlame0w. oF.Ey VED IN ECAST I MRS RAKIED I"OSH�O""t' mo- I'INSul- R C-S IN WANCR CLEAR ANWzw AUU. No-.4-4 CNATO FRAAES,�� �F, Recycling TO.mck L-------------------------------------------- 'r CIPE EXCHANGE 26083,LLC 1/2'T'" _1Z I. Nt 1 4.so.Nut PACK W/UP �,EAST ELEVATION DO-CUTOFF I'DWD INSUI_GUSS IN CI-EAR ANODIZED ALUM. FRANCE AVENUE TIf1A10-B­FRANCS 1/2-DEE'P PANEL REVM BUSINESS vpusAtgroupinc. rAAA161PEr 130•-P —WEST PROPOM UNE I �—mUCK WUNf CUB utE I 130•-01 TRUac cotATr - - - ,� PROPOSEf) 61R11CiUaE 605-00• 86300' I 662.00• 0li N. ,(866.60• ❑ 0..100'2. /asP.ar O O O 6s6.00' Q Q wTUw esz.w' iw°rl� � TRUCK COURT SECTION 16RE eaavlW 03-21-2010 CITY SIZE RENEW 302!1 30241100 6arz 03-21-2012 rlon we m L OIIIMS IatWW rt G.HAWKINS G.HAWKINS/J.MAGNUSON •E—niol'a n 1M e aecbvic Rea.ilia D"cwrA rnporsL4 Iw m �mayc or .m...v.ro earaC1m.�aixoda.a.. a Iro wlo�mu6on aeann.a m ae<waa flo. •fl•[6wY[lYa mq na a Wy ro wt IM fnel av-boil condllrone. It ie 14 roaponaiWR,of tee uaar to•ecify al IuyouI,dinro•>ioro and DINT rotated .Thie d:.I.t^ rot W ueed a copied wileWl Prior.ttm cone L O d d9We roawM OOm NO 0UF10PFD B!: Real Recycling lccy ling CPE EXCHANGE 26083,LLC FRANCE AVENUE BUSINESS SS3NISflB 3nN3AV 33NV/JJ i 311'£909Z 3'JN1MOX3 3sYJ 8011O.Ciag a3B3x31-11 a _ o p«p w lop<ow w.p,paop c�y3• 09• / j u. - �,F'". �/ peip[IW+e to asn cuawewq.i olq .! � —[ II .01] eyl)p•[1'I�q�ouoCCW i �/'/ '� �A 59GV. I I eh['!)I'cuonlpuoa 3Vnq-sp I eyl ' \ 9' nNle+JPw,roao Inu fow W�.I? W13• 0\• '� q e I� ` I I I uooaNe u.pw.o,uoa uwNuuoln WIN sxongno)aspws,me)w vulva nwww,w] 0 � I I am m*Nwpn wl Id w au�mwm.a xlm,opwsxoa mwla,nw.v,,,o xonvm,sw)»,onuuvnvu,nrpw -a WNW Nx maw ac cwwsp uo+l ayau Tell aw . w3x,,o sp„w«wwx,oxswpxwvpsx,Tol,Yn,xrooa n n)x,x pxm,np,s.vw x lvaa.oYx p pd•xlIdn)o)«xlv p xep)am)xnxnmYssa wdaavaowx,„wn�Ix..e.rn.). pn v3 a pwxx.)omnx»vw)I,xmuroNv,xn mx) is� e s z ze rn/ / 3' 1 I I , �I pp • � �� �� /S'le A� I vx nxnx)uYpYe)x,wpw xnotlaer pxr xorsznxN 'T ' �, /1 T ok w.van,nw„wpmmoae m,Txs nu xmN Wluvo � a xn � i xr xi P �O� 3w wlaww�px))»,unoxmxx xxww urs)wxlxuxs nu xro«,xvmuxm]x)tlpuvnxo])x,nv '4'. >'- / / Uvvw .),),..pap,p)npp)d)e,.w,.x,:.,nx,,,...x.>rxpl,.]p, s01 — .d.or d3,xp x,3x,..3:,xd)x,pp),]wNSGnxnxm,.an) -- — a)wpoz.)»,.w�,.vouom,oo,orowx,..o,a)ovvp.,,ws,os.o,a.nmo,nvxa«am)v.-G ,�reNla�p nY•IG,x)wm.m)w3d)»x,xn..x.�xa,..n)p)pd]s)d.)»,wp,m,pp,p[pdp3"pPo,pp, nx° - / // // / / I ------��° 11 _ e �.. ° ,oswwn x�xu.usnPo3pmp nwdpaxnnwx vo,pw,xoa)x)m,newronnwrs pxwwpmxpxux �$` ��— �7 vD' �. I t — 1°B4 0) -- � �• xomawpK3p snPo xi nrav>o,spwpmvp)d vpp)anvan v)x,vn,3.aasnm wov„ioseo)usxnnw ,`p%�; / p^ ( zoux ovmn nm x ve mxwrs f\ \scsa• .y/ f ° oze a$ \ r \ I \ )wne,o)w n)rode)x,o„N3.mp.domxv.])�pve)»,x.»ror xa,.sspv.mn,.xd)x,pox>srn,)x,v p ��//).,• z axem)x.n.Gn)epxrtl�mlxvpx�xn,xrowpxvp x�awp«Yp,n«xp.GmmaroMm,Td,xpax3.� '/JIII � � ,$ °'ay I _ v rs +'�. )x)wv,xw o,uxm,pxv x)wx,nxprs Txp�,])vN YxoK onwvw.xwnnwe Po xans s nwn wd,xm x a e OL)zaa TUO,Nwo4,r,NSnPo,M,«ew pue l,K 3».ww,nx nPoa Mxn uawb n«,SLasme II� . ax nwpw)rev,Mxn]wo])e 3nb»,v»,xCa]nvazxo]3»apxnnp pmvnuN,ozrnMpnsrn3aVNn, � ....._./ v798=333 9NI0ims 03S0d02i oppp \ w I � �• r)non]n..sxo>,xlarvo)uKxoanuvwm o,pnlnpmmpn)n.r.)p))ubwo]„wrs)do,]vd,oxm)»,o I\\ \t\ t� — � J I 11 019 ve \ /� ,vp.3vnnc 3»,ep).mrxro,ep„v»s dp.Td,xm)x, I 1 1 \ � \° cse S• \ // 0 qq \ 4 )Id[z)v)ew)anz-m, 1 w LPG' s'Ie n�x�ws� um,n.wpa x)msx,do.)dnlm pxrouxNx)nrnx».uo)9v f� \ 1 \ I `a` 'ap r o's NI I� wssx)w„ox)w>dn�]x��,o n.,oxpnxw•+dp,d�odo,>,v,�x,epv)nmxpl,]odssslme \\\ \\\g � 1 ,� s `� I I � x �* eoe 4�'I—\\ — Svl6l'oN 3J31'0tlu uaJw mvn'xni vpvaax'px))�i woun>'+,snroxou.'ow wmpx o�p)uw�T,oa xs "p�1 �cb� \ \ \ S« � \ / p/ w nnx')usea)`lw xpzxaWxoawf Mrsuoeslb�i»3b)wC:aw�,m.3BmM ZiN,]waxN �yy��.. �3tt�( \\\\ 6 * I J � z• \/ / )wsnluwa uouanvssxm m+e aT.md)xro»axs nxwdo].vn svou.v,uwo,n.,p4 u),Kl ) �p..+ v� \ e0 al.� I�\ cam. s.,vuova,xnwmo,nvwvp uv).od.aw.o,.nssn)xsxaunr,)d.rnn.,,mKw,TY,wa s„p f �x„osmx.xolnndssxw)x,oxnno 1\ \ ]»)»uW,.]n,xw x%xus3un�n pxnsmmur]m)d o,wued'�YUpoxrepx�o uvwxm sv,�„I,n �� / \ • \G ppc \ / Ip r yM'—,�'' uoaw�w,.a�ewxoipvwis.M:scam-[ oy ) e'fe vze dU� rn �w oi�o n:,s':)�.`oeudd�v"',on'.x'ilnw)»,pxuT,xm.e vxowpxox3wwm f s� \ \ 11 x � tii` I p / � `s'fs axe w3pu�°vawpwex dzx v+wmwxxc'awni�y iam/pnxnn pnpumadonsp>'exn)as.n unx.,m�os�»,a,p.n.,rn'co \ (: ��,I°`� �\ e s ii4p •ya / .� o I, 'u ` " TTOZ/OT/Tl:a)vo 0H9E2'p>xy,.*. unxnazi sine x)»,xp xwp,n xaavwxwxi unnn)TnMans)»,.aa»amxm,m]edpixY,rna su a o ::\\ $ �1p ` c I /� 1 xe�% — — 6w I uo yJeW -u+3avup xpxw)»,smvv. x - � •. »,x,x)N 9)x)x))wm xrd3mans)d)x,a.»,rN3wwd»xpx)3x„e,oxn.xf 1.11 e ms`/ )` $ tl )»,xnoxwn,re vo 3unxm puona o,vona s3,rodaar 3x,pxomm),)x,x,u)Nwp)x„ n �`a pwx.)w3tl mxs vouvaaum)xa Th'[I xps[u mnvxs nsnsvaTVO,nss pxnmewvxr xo uolu N p xa�`° .Pox,.oxwnwdrsv)x,ovslxb),p).pxs sad]wnwm..px.l[)'n,ew.tl«na)d,e d) \\ / u.4 >.;` �� \ / ro[0xsWUpx Tnanumo,wnwmw•vrxmdxumvrw)»,oxo,rsxrons3pKwwxo.dpm-e \ ^� z� �'�j I aze� 1 I/ wnzaip�w�,awnd33N9x3 WpKmNk ))px)pedNp]SOaDVep nvapv)une ' \ `/ � I' — 1—_ 1 � 1�� SSS ua>.xpvwv,w WV Upx uaaz xowixouvam,o.rs'xwrnn)nr,YMmxs xno3)wmroaxmmwaovaa � � Y Maws SUON <uo w,,,,m x.ary„wn.)na>wa,w � / � � � i4• _ ,3 ��... l .x --� -- x0uw1.SOL x"01 S9.09M.09 4 .y ']” :• T 1 n)♦ 'n3g3 pn033a3n0 r, y a ) ..._ 0 anO1N0O V FmIO.E) xw rvouvnn3 ions � . �s,K� �3NI133v mwn ONmnm ------9NINm13ll J _____ENNIMMS N T45F R ________________ 4 x 3 I G' 7— RT T'I �c 3ysnd0 �.:�, - — x),. I FORCEMAIN(SAN.)0-P.10-00-1 P--- pus mup,Inc. L-------------------- -F-N ------- EASE ENT DO ME ---------- ------- GAS LINE 1 4 -CmsffN-G AT ELECTRIC SERVICES&PLUG MAIN ---- -- ..... TELEPHONE . ............. UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES .... ......................... N.OW RECONSTRUCT A. TH UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH " i "RIM-O7 -EKSIHC HYDRANT 11YEjMLN1 A,CURB THE'STANDARD UTILITIES SPECFFICAYONV AS PUBUSHED By THE CITY ENGINEERS KLCdTMRM ...........I- ............ ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA(CEAM EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN.CONTRACTOR SHALL .................. OBTAINACOPY OFTHESE SPECIFICATIONS. I ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE TO M REQUIREMENTS. HI-Y" NOS ETO-IPIAnR-IIINII-INEI"IIIIIUIII"IIIEITI 2. C.NT-S-.-OPE.,TU�..IF,I-E�FE..�...�-.ANIPI.. IL ------ -- ------- IF.-U I E- DO SO BY THE CITY,MY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR CON UNSCHEDULE0 DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ME THE LIABILITY OF THE ��TO P.-S T.;Y, IE SEWER SERVICE IE-8490i CONTRACTOR N VEW� I 3 A MINIMUM VERTICAL.SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATE MAIN 11/10/2011 3O 0.23450 CITED A 1=1=1=1- --- - AND SEWER MAN(WILDING,STORM AND SANITARY)CROSSINGS UNLESS N P 80 LF-6'PVC wa SDR 2602.01( OTHERWISE FOR STORM SEWER CROSSINGS B. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE ASSPECIFIEDIN CE-1 SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPTM MODIFIED HEREIN. 6'SANITARY SEWER OS 10 I 11 ALL MATERIA15 SHIULLCOMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. E-851.0 cs SERVICE IE RE-860.0 U.SANITTA 111*11 TO 11 PVC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IE- U.WATERNAIN TO BE DUCTILE IRON-CLASS 54 WITH 7.5 FEET MINIMUM COVER. 8071.7 4, ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE Pin WITH RA RMNTS AND RUBBER GASKETS,CORRUGATED HDPE PIPE,OR AS NOTED ON PLAN. cam .1.PROJECT 10,11141 CSTO R-25 3 W ATE S. RIP RAP SHALL BE M./DOT CLASS 3, FIE- C. CONTRACTOR SHAUL REFER TO ANNITE-FALL.PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND infra DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE EAT PORCHES.01 TRUCK DOCKS.PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. P, THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION ANIVOR ELEVATION OF HYDRANT- EXISTING UTILITIES A5 SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTIUTY VALVE-, R OVE TDRANT& COMPANIES AND,WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD.THE INFORMATION ISNOT ON RELIEDONAS BUNG EUCTOACOMPUETF.TNECONITFACTCA MUSTCALTIM' APPREIPRIAT UTUITY COMPANY AT LEAST AS HOURS BEFORE MY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST va EXACF FIELD LOCATION Of UTILITIES IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTFRACTOR TO ROOF MAIN CONNECTION 63 LF RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 0 1.92X WOWNIONTH PLANS.THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE E�1156.40 CONTRACTOR,BY CALLING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454 D002. -H E THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO �OPOSED BUILDING CS C GRATE ADJA%CTOAOPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASISOF THIS PROJECT.THE RE- .5 CON RVRUL I HELD SOLIELLY RESPONSIBLE 1.A.DMIAGEST.THE ADJACENT FFE-862.4 85 LF 12'PVC IRE- . PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROTECT. 0 2.50< V SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 61MIERAJUY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES.THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FDA OCNOFFIINS ON THE 101 SITE,INCLUDING�-01-PERSONS-0 PROPERTY DURING .6 PER ORMANCE Of THE WORK.TUTS REQUIREMENT W U.APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE T CONDUIT CONMUMON REVIEW OFTECOWMUOR-SPERFOR�UISNMNTENMD 0.3ox• INITTEO TO N WORWIIHIUI,"ElUTY11THEEN61NEE111THEDEVEL.PEITI TO INCLUDE REVIEW OF THE ADEQUACY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SAFETY MEASURES IN,ON OR Com I NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION SITE CSTC.R-25 3 W C GRATE RIE- . G ALLAIREASO SIDMEPROPEMWUNWIESTHATAREDIMRBtDgynLIW IE- CONSTRUCTION SHALLBE RESTORED IN KIND,SODDED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6 REMOVE CATCH BASIN PLUG STOW SEWER INCHES OPTOPSOI PLACEDUNEATH THE SOD. PLAN FUR RISER H THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES,WARNING SIGNS,DIRECTIONAL SIGNS,FLAGMEN AND 1ECTICH LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY.TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL.CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 77 IF 21 STANDARDS I ALL ORSTESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY M INDEPENDENT SOILS ENGINEEKEROMYATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING U STAWEORUNSUITAlLUESORSSHAU.BECONIPUETEDM RED IRED BY THE S0113 ENGINEER,THE UTILITY SPICKFILL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE EQUIREMENTII OF THE 501�ENGINEER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPON IOU FOR CSTG:R-2 3 W/ COORDINATINGAUL REQUIRED SORS TEMAND SOIL INSPECTIONSWITH THE SOK.5 ENGINEEk ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION RE- I PRI A TOPILACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE,A TEST ROLLWIUL BE REQUIRED ON THESTREET AND PUKING AREASUBGRAIDE THE MR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM ME IE-- IE, TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGE OF 25 TONS.TE TEST ROLLING SMLL BE ATTHE DIRECTION OF ENESOIBENGINEER AN DSHALLBECOMPLUEDINARE7575DIREUEDOYNEMILS G "Ell THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE*RICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET 01 PARKING ANAARE UNSTABLE.CORRECTION OF THE SU RADESORSSHAULBECOMPLETEDIN 118 LF 30' ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS Of THE SOILS ENGINEER. R THE TREES AND OTHER NATIMAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AND/OR ACLACENT TO THE 15 IF `R FROM ME Of PFLME CONCERN TO THE CONTRACTOR 5 OPERATIONS HE WILL BE REQUIRED 10% TOPRO ECT THE TREES WHICHARETODE SAM TORE SURE THAT EQUIPMENT 15 NOT 30xxx HYDRANT Z NEEDLESSLY OPERATED UNDER NEARBY TREES AND SHALL EXERCISE-E CAUTION IN WORKINGAOJi NT TO TUES.SHOULD ANY PORTION Of THE TRUE BRANCHES REQUIRE 30-100 61 VALVE REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'5 EQUIPMENT,HE SHALL OBTAIN THE r TEE SERVICES FAPROFESSIONALTIREETRIMMINGSERVICE TO TRIM THE TAEESPA�MOFNE DOE BEGINNING OF THE OPERATION SHOULD THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE 3-21-2012 TH BREAKING OF ANY LIMBS, E BROKEN LIMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATE AN.CUTS -- z SHALL BE PROPERLY PROTECTED TO MINIMIZE ANY DAMAGE.COSTS FOR TRIMMING SERVICES MCA SHALL BE NSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CODING CONSTRUCTION AND NO SPECIAL -BY PAYMENT WILL BE MADE DJD/JFJ AS BY C MCA GSYG:IM11 AE-659.7 Ex,�Es E- m t� 0•IE-053.41 (FIELD IFF11 DIM,as fk- 157 LF E-1.� -...y reflect STROH 4 00 •lhl T-t-blolt­&�,.It il th, cSm do-io..-d~ R-1733 ­IWAY Pf fl,. W"ley 41 RE-1555.2 27 LF 30•HIME L 41 FlIm--f may IH,-11 00309 copied..-16P,.1iUMI-.1- ORNO)MET DEVE1.0m ff. .......... CPE EXCHANGE 26083,LLC FLu 411 - FRANCE AVENUE BUSINESS I 1 / Opus AE Group,Inc. ---------------------- ----- ---__ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____—_ _--_---_--_—_-- _.//_ _ ___________________1-L 1 � F �L/ L _._ D 9...... ........ .]v Do De r. • e.. a.. ]. t t..:b`a, o ..� , b... •...,,,L. awerv.an xc nFFn,me r ats wolaWwF edt epW1M nll/lo/zou . e W—Pe ECI,w 19143 infra - --- ROPOSED BUILDING FFE=8524 i __-- _--__ .Y<- _�. f• ..-.•d r:e...r...._........vY.w.:r.....,.r R.-.d,axn. •. ]. '�,. ].. Y, ].. ev�^.,-w.u,.e„..r.i......�....a,..w�w.:ur:...:�, }[EWr xwa« D, ]. ].. L•..... 30-100 3-21-2012 - - laartb label Z MCI Wafer Lt-b, e, e., ,. .. 1 A 32 ";a,,,><, t• !• b.. e. e.. 2 A 32 DJD/JFJ v a r 3 A 32 MW m D t° 4 B 32 MCA 5 B 32 6 B 32 •brm mo «cw in tM lrenaa:aaion o1 e 7 v 30 e4ct,mi tk me om mnymin m M 8 W 30 reryonaible iw any cbima,tlamoge or 10 w 30 ] ti e.. 11 W 30 •Ckmm� mq ml ecc M Y retM 12 W 30 lbe to b t tltion.8' Ne 30 raeponaib ly o/Ue user the~.+IO ob ] 19 W 30 byoNe,dimembna and o lb 30 Mormotun. 30 a oiq d'umanl may not M u nor II\\ / b ]. a et moxv eef e•.E ewe 'd -.t o eniten c nl. . ,. ], •o ?° t, ei ft"'•. t. a.e E° L.. 'yi v b.v yi'b.. �'1: x. L: L, rr Ool Oft reeerwtl !Sao 1.-+-.s.1r_2.,•___wS/ . f� a .&late R�ecyc ng AM L1(MIIG OPSIQS,I3L. w.u+rA13aD clatr lives 051TG emTO�s s1rla+ CPE EXCHANGE 26083,LLC 2920 FlIRQ1Y IAlE w THE 1T%11 saoDlllE. ETK111185]OaVB FTAT 4fASS]IIb=EVLL CVICIEF ST.AMWli,C41 55918 TYPE A..3500—VERfIr'xr,IN9P (b/V1NIVBE 1535 /V/tD28/P5) 612-252-4100,612-252-4141 fax COWfMf:SCOTT WRFS D• ,.. TYPE liY FdiIT[}lfA1 W-11[x-320P3ti-E028(by—15320M/Hi5/FD28/PB/790) 30'TAIY Sl'EEL k30iE _� __ x b D b !: v L.: �'�� 11tE Fl lerwre:J:\fRTth\1612\Franca h VN•19.:Y1a car tertneter.ff:i ocr FRANCE AVENUE 3 I A 1 Gq1 aoCOFR✓1Y2-39N1"-350P3U-CS/30'TALL (3'TallBUe) BC�(_B^a( 37000 0.750 395 RIISINFSS ———————————————— --- ---- --------------- ------ psAEG p, __ �/ Opus Group,Inc. ----------------- --- I__ I L------------------ma=r• wo ol,.m.l.W'.r wAMP wNrzE DAX M ----------------- --- -- —..1...._.,_.�.� ———————— —— -..''----------------------------Tr-------n e H SHARKIASTM wnFYLOCUST �°N..P -,- ..,. 'sMe.rm.m' z.s- .R , lET � P'C'R7H ,®�®�.� I � \ �� CIA � P°,°I.,,..,.m°'� ANNG,SPEn C.Al - 1 i HB nAXBAR zo �`P RM er rYhr�.m noNnootic R,nn �v`� =I + + + w.tr,rz ANEESETREEUUIC c + + + + ! RB t.Dim Sr. - lav e.s ee B _ T + ' �e„.� , MNBRIwAnTE,EN-VIER ;g —�� — + +x SS .�u°°sPnnsnm. NNGSn:iwc—I'LE EPA �z +++ + + a ' _ ( iw.ENiA iAia + + + + aI .:. ... -- a i <I' BN YFM PROJECT I 9111 + + + a + ++++ CB 1 COLDRACCILUE5PAUCE 5 + + + a s t �ra :OPOSED BUILDING . SPi �ussylretu SCOTCN VINE FEE=B6jA- � �-- — '. + a a + + }"_ QUANTITIES SHOWN IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE CONTMUM'S BMNi18�� CONVENIENCE.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES SHOWN O PI -AN. THE PN. 4 e � f + � LANDSCAPE LEGEND E f .L. a,.nut W \ w ° Dn PEA x" _.i GLS Rn�,mm.e�G.w,,. GAo-LOw FAAGANIT ZIMAC .s CO A 1 z.sw + BEA Ylwm°m rzoml,m'..nnT�wn ta.MO.MLwn<.wNM.wM .s cDNr. B I e.A . IS I>P. Euows'A IAMESNRFA —_ S. &nM�e,r' MSUTAC - - IAE LEWD � d i I _ - i ROCK SOD/SEED MIX LEGEND -'- - SYM. TYPE SEED MIX + 1�^ NATIVE WET PRAIRIE BWSN W3 WITH'NO NOW FESCUE' WETLAND FRINGE MR U6 WIT.-.0 MOW FESCUE' /$ SOD HIGHIAND SALT TOLERANT VARIETY ROADSIDE TURFGRASS MIX MNDOT260 ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION NOT BbY1 Mel®I INTENDED TO BE SODDED,OR RETENTION BASINS 30XXX y-:gyp==y;. ROCK MULCH:ALL SNRUB BEDSAND MAINTENANCE STRIPSAROUND BUILDING SHALL BE DRESSERCTN� ROCK AS SUPPUED BY DRESSER TRAP HOCK INC,DRESSER,WI.PH:1.800.53].35]3. 3OXXXI00 SMLL BE•ROCK MODEL N814,GRAY IN COLOR OaE MCA ar n DJD/JFJ MCA .E” m°y m m M gealrtNC Ha R"Op°mn n M '_m IA,Rny cbim.�N.w e'9gI.N_1 PA N uN umubauW m .1 LM inl.mwli.n°m10_.n. rmic IiNS. •EP., IBe—-­y rd'M III.Imo'.-C N Owditi°M.It ie the bpbility°I the Iv.,tP w,ify.II uL..im el. -d°th., 1 °t o w w .chi.B«°m.m IT,n t M°..4 m ® ogee 1HOUt wi R,itlm con TL SGLE IN FEET NORTH TO e a nVXe�mnwN uL eE SVAATEInrrNE UrE iuSSOAEMnTEAEVw�crrox0uw.I.T 11 rr ��.v;�ra88Lmo.r. '", ,m ORIfD YIn 0ElF1�F0 BT: E ` w.iuuoiuum. Real Estate Recycling INrlrw BwBmCOT"IlE lHllA MRaE"I 1111XAE BEU.. '"°"°`°"�"��"""°"`°r Mr...I...... ""° CPE EXCHANGE 26083.LLC T. AIT-1-7ONT ED n roRRA�_ro ruT.r lnoiPwawanNE nmr.r Lw�er XN.aL wrRr THE wi".Im�.�,":.r ..I",r.3° a­EA III M..R.M.rzt.,z aTML z Lz ..,.,..°.. A °°" "°" + "°°°"^ FRANCE AVENUE h..,...P.a".,"°..w".�v,.. I, ,IN-MM.P.Im "....K."...°.. RI IGINJ FCC