Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1968 PC Apps I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 61n5' Street Location of Property 67th to 69th and James Avenue North Legal Description of Property Outlots A and B. Twin ,C,,tips Interchange Park Addition Owner: Brooklyn Center Address _ 6128 Logan Avenue North Development Corporation Telephone No. 561-7350 I Applicant: S ame Address Telephone No. Type of Request: X Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request_ Rezoning from I-1 (Industrial Park) to R-5 (Multiple Residential) . Reason for Request Fee $ 75.00 Receipt No. pplicant September 16, 1968 Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved Denied this day of 19 subject to the following conditions i ,,.. ._ . _, - PLANKIM; COMISSION INFO-MMTIM) SHEET Application No,. 68054 Applicant: Brooklyn Center Development Corp. Description of Request: Rezoning from 1-1 (industrial Park) to R-5 (Multiple Pamily Residence) Property: Property involved lies on either side of Jcnt.ies AvelnAe, between 67th and 69th Avenues. Miner.- Brooklyn Center Development Corp. BACKGROMM 1) This property involved is a portion of the Brooklyn Center L Industrial Park/Twin Cities interchange Park, lying directly south of 69th Avenue, and to the west of the "strip" multiple residential develolvaent along bald t Avenue. POINTS TO BE CONSIDEJRMO� 1) in examinin.9 this proposed razoning for multiple residences, and in the ones to come later in the "Brown Farm" area,, the City must decide what effect such uses placed there would have in the .1cuture on other potential apartment prop- erties in the C-ity- in addition, conoideration must be given to the development and potential development of this type of use in other parts of the metropolitan area. The basic problem is to provide enough properly zoned (includ-3L-ng properly located) properties suited to this use. Some of the factors which should enter into a determination of proper IoQation for apartment development are.- a) pro--.UwAty to transportation, either roadways for personal vehicles, or mass transit (existing or proposed) ,- b) proximity to commercial uses to serve t1he greater density of population, hopefully without the need for vehicular transport, at least for every-day neads; c) proximity to amenities, such as ,;heaters and par.%s, etc. Page 2 Application No., 68054 Some discussion along these lines is contained in the Comprebensive Plan beginning on page 25, Transportation, to a great extent, has come to rule our lives,, at least insofar as land use is concerned, and is probably one of the greatest problems in locating the different types of land use. on the one hand,, it seems logical and proper that greater densities of population (in apartments) be located close to transportation corridors, while on the other hand, steps should be taken to mitigate the effects of the nearness to these traffic corridors on the quality of 'Life within the apartment developments. 2) One of the factors which should be considered seriously, unless the assumption of unlimited demajid i-2'Or multiple residences is made,, is that a great wnount of land adjacent to Lyndale Avenue is probably more suited to this type of development, being on a direct traffic corridor to the dovmtown are,-:); . Although the area near Lyindale was not put into this land use claissificcation in the Comprehensive • Plan, I expect that this will be done during a future updating of -the Plan. If, in fact, the Lyndale Avenue area will be found more suited to this type of use, and if there is a saturation point for this type of use, it may be important at this time that the wore appropriate area b, developed prior to the less appropriate one, so that the less appropriate area might be left to find its ov-,m. best use in -t-I'le future., STAFF COMMEWLS: 1) Zoning is;, Ir-o a large. extent over the long term, a reflection of demand in -"-be market for certain mixes of land uses. The function og zoning often appears to me to be a moderating influence on development, producing time forvell-reasoned location of uoes based on couniunity and metropolitan needs, and not only the Personal needs of particular developers whose needs may not truly be reflective of community needs. One of the major land uses is, of course, housing, and the need transcends political boundaries., Vie "apartment boom" is the most recent type of housing boom, and has become probably the rqost troublesome ooning problem for suburban Communities; Nillth much of the pr6blem arising froro. the fact that there is insufficient land properly located and zoned for t-hase uses in the suburbs. 2) 11here has not been a comprehensive overlook of the potential grm7th of mull-A.Die family residential development in the netropolitan area. In the abseLce of such a study projecting Page 31 Application No. -580541 the li�-,ely saturation point of multiple units in the area, one could reasonably assume, at least for the short term, that no saturation point exists, and just begin to project numbers for his community based on the amount of land which the community -wishes to make available for the use. This determination should then beg-in with a series of locational principles 1,,7hich would set out tlaose areas which might be s"itable for the use, 3) If this rezoning is to be approved, it should be with the for knowledge tbat thle 300-plus -residential uses which will exist there should be provided with a seconO means of access other than to 69th Avenue. This second roans of access could take the fozin of a direct link with 65th Avenue,, or by means of a roadvlay to Shingle Creek Parlway, and then to the 65th and Wunboldt intersection,, This secosidanv means of access would jorov-J-de a, less circuitous route to interstate #94, or to the Brooll;-Aale complex. Vt is anticipated that the developers would rea ,usst a vacation of fames Avenue, and a new roadway could lie reqvired to replace and improve its function. 0'ie of the -"actors to consider in such a rezoning, as A -I ment1oned is 'Che proxii-,iii:,y of comercial uses for this higher density population- For several years, we have awaited the development of retai-1- aorw-ercial uses in the southeast quadrant of 69th and Rumboldt,. -This type of development'-11 usually follov7s residential, development, and now that thz area is being built up with single family and multiple family uses. -the commercial activit-v has begun to be developed, witness the la` 11 11-A-eneral store on the north- west corner of 69t.1 and Humboldt, it is expected more com- mercial Unes will follm' in the near futiare, especially in the sout.ieast quadrant, and it is my persojaal opinion that dit-ect access should be provided (if this requested multiple, zoning is granted) from U-tis davelopment to the 1-1tarabcIdt Zvveriue co-mrn,-��rcial area- The flavw in this theory is that the applicant does not own the intervening property; t111ZO t4'lonlL OCi a -MlItter !-)s 'Ole municipality providing the direct acc-r-ss, possibly a!i expensive proposition, given the R-5 zon--',ag of t1he intervaning parcel. 11-- the walkway is to be provided, it should not result in the intrusion of private areas iii the future develowent to the • cast,, by including the property thus used as density for the small developn-iont, as t'.e s.'i.tallnr development is unlikely to have a surplvs oS.-- amenitie� on the small lot. f CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 6som Street Location of Property Irving Avenue - 70th to 71st Avenue Legal Description of Property That part of Outlots 1 and 4, George' s Terrace, lying Easterly of George' s Terrace3rd Addition. Owner: David Baerg Address 7030 James Avenue North Telephone No. Applicant: Same Address Telephone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance X Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Approval of preliminary plat of Baerg Gardens Addition. Reason for Request Fee $ 34.00 Receipt No. 26172 Applicant December 11, 196 Date D71.-es of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION .Approved Denied this day of +- 1 19 subject to the following conditions PLANNING COMMISSION INFORMATION SHEET Application No. 68074 Applicant: David Baerg Description of Request: Approval of preliminary plat of Baerg Gardens Addition. Property: West side of Irving Avenue at 70th Avenue. Owner of Property: David Baerg BA CKG ROUND: 1) The proposed plat completes the subdivision of the George Johnson property and conforms very well with the master plat of the area approved 4-1-65 by the Commission. r� i I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER zoning Application Application No. 68013 Street Location of Property 70th to 73rd on the east side of Humboldt Legal Description of Property Owner: Homedale Blyds. Address 5217 Wayzata Boulevard, Mpls. Telephone NO-545-1464- Applicant: Same Address Telephone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance X Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Approval of the preliminary plat of "Northland Estates 4th" Addition. Reason for Request Fee $ Ar,.nn Receipt No. 24412 Applicant March 15, 1968 Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration April 4, 1968 May 13, 1968 Ap ril 25, 1968 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved Denied this ? day of 19 ' .k'_, subject to the following conditions _ Y�, ' v v 1. ,, i . I • -�t-: �- _ _ �.. .. _ . :��.. .,. • .. • _._ , CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER zoning Application Application No. 68052 Street Location of Property 69th & Humboldt Ave. N. Brooklyn Center Legal Description of Property Tract A of attached legal description Owner: Hi-Crest Square, Inc. Address 5730 Duluth St. Minneapolis, Minn. Telephone No. Applicant: Woody & Embretson Address 5730 Duluth St. Minneapolis, Minn. Telephone No. 545-3795 Type of Request: x Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request to change from commercial to multiple zoning on tract A of attached legal description Reason for e e R qu st to make use of property to its Highest & Best Use I Fee $ 75.00 Woody & Embretson Receipt No. 25633 Applicant By: Stanley R. Sopczyk l _�flv Selptember 13 1968 J Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved (Denied this ? day of 19 >' subject toe following conditions I I i i ?'�:AN'NXNG COMISSIO14 I-NFORMATXO'kk-� Appiication ego, 66052 • ,4itbre-son airad. Woody construction alit! -r- . �. - (By Stan le-V sopczy,,z) PeTcription of Requ<-,,st IDI.ezoninq -Zrom C-2 (Coimiterce) to Y-5 (multiple rtes-idance) Property-. Abutting on the east side of Humbolft Avenue to the south of 69th Avenue� (Part of the westerly 300 feet of Lot 2P Block 1, Hi Cres't'-, Squl-re Addition) Owner of Property.-, Cres•.'-- fl',(Taare lno BA CKGROUNIC) I) This property is the westerly part (abutting onto Humboldt Avenue) of the pprolximately 1.2 acres, of land set out in the Comprehensive Plan for car.ume--rcial purposes in the southeast quad-rant of 69th aind nur►. oldt- Avenue. Alt present, abottt 1/2 acre at the 0..-!: 69th and numboldt is being • utilized for cormercial purposes (-onicn 76-Pure oil Station) . The rem,:.z.in(Le r of the propert.j,,- JI-s vacea-it-, a, cept for a single family div.,elling lyirig direct-ly east of the service station. 2) The ptirpose of this rezoning, ais by drawings, submitted to the Staff, is rezone, a s-*Crip of land on the eas-L sl,de W': !ztumboldt( Avenue (about 300 feet in depth u -Ids to an RIS Mu- tit le Family Residence P This rezoni--ng leave. (ass,:Lruing a land divils,-!,-on along t)ae Iines ind-icated by, it.he drawings) the Ilome on the propert-y as a sinqlfii comercial tract of and a vacant coxmercJ'-al -Bract of about- .4, ac-re to tnc� F;ou-th of the Lau:'e Station. The remaining 7. 5 ,n-c,-nes 'to east 1,Ymild re;nain La cormf.:,--ccial zoo ing- POINI.005 TO BE 1) The ajpplj.cicm,�•L and/or his caue-r-ts havc,,, in past Months, attempted to convince the StF'ff thzt th.e se•:.tinq out of a acre area as a P.eighborhocd -node in the Com,prehens`t.-e 'P-Lan was incorrect, o-�- i-1: cor-rsct �,:IIC the • ttme tI^--e, Plan w,-.)�; prepared, that it 11-as become Inco,e--rect dme to a changs Mn the met h.ods of ret-ail comsrcial ac-Itivi'k-y in the suburbs., The two-pronged ph-1-11osophy advanced by the owners on the holding of 12 acres for 2 as follOWS., uses :Lp- this area is further de-r a"-hough neighborhood ar late 50S and iP- 0-9 llc�'�3: Po"-n 1. 1 .3 - $ JA :1 center w f04-': each "ll.eighbornood 'n s, now been. rcpiac,-ed by, conveniGlice centers S-kP.cb_ Il'i' l General, TOM etc- , Ofx'ering quick--ni-Op shopp'nq, with olic -1 .4 c-, .,r Dzg t ips beilg L p-I are S' S h direc`_� ed to coxmuu,�-Iity or req:'01-1al sh0P:,E _"rI9 a Uc as Targe-g'-_, Holi6a'Yr ',Zllrookdci'p, Apache, etc. . Setcondly, the 2j.rst theory- I' s acceptable, then this locatloo is incorrect for a neigbborhood zolopping center because it j.s toc, close to T�To.rthbrodlk znnd Brookdale Shopping Centers to c rive sconclai.ca.11y, _ i.no., a wjau.er convenience centp-r of- tlhe ty.pa mentioned above (ivh-'P.ch can survive 'j 1�7 V -i. e C'O.S C a 11 Ple residential _ A on the bus-iness from t! -- mu ej.ments the zirea) is rao-Ce app-ropy:iLate, and Jj: a larger iS3 shoWn to -�cor_a -. cally feasible, oa t th,at it sj.-iouj,d r, rcI:)ably be '-ocz-,-,'Lnrad i Yv s2 no.rth, in Center. to mitia'ate 'C'ha of '_Yorthbroolr dlall 11 -f a 2) Scme. time. z?C,�os caPTI)JO-cal'It slij' ' : , i 9s 0 - Pro- Posed comme-7cial complen. on thi��l Q-rcpe2 'Ly for discussion proposa?. &:�d not encompass the 'Cr act, but on.1y' zibout 3' acres,- t1he building j.axo7,_)c).,-ied 1.5,000 sq'Llara :F_ee-i� (conveni.e-nce grocery, p.-'�_ckup, The remainder of' Z�'-"e 12 -­_"xas was he 'ar Um ejj s. g ants av p?ne decrease al vity as, conLained in t-h�_- S_"Zr.� 0 2 s -mo-� ca 13-tely a re-'IecUon of �Droposal .n th e :unmLngj - 1ding :­ormto�x:clal bu.L 6 9 t -. 'r' ( - Le Aorbal 11 the corner o - �h 3) Tbe c_.,C. 13 t�nat tti�,Ls. is not a c1a, 11 h;orhaad cento­ 3_�y stat-,-i'19 Ulat nO FicajO - ed CW_ '.Kro ar cl aJ con i;act ed oaal, 1 3 9 o-,,: eLe- 01:1e• YGtail ilay ' - -ot 2 :01,Oj.-y pol or than preceding iti, z�nlw' th-_ J.s only now daveloping xF�SJ'%r3On'U'=JIY- J 3 y, n _ I lyn s c i a. site.. t am Sure, and the v?OUJ.d re:'Iate to a.ps ii-I -91-he ' e, co-mmerc-La.3. EW a g:_ .a._ ceal of logic anK merit in the positions and lheorves adyancW by the ar plicaM. y way VMry well be that ho typical center (the smue voriety as the urager/Lynn orcok Center on Osseo Road) as a freestanding unit is on its way out. to be replaced by a greater nvv5pr of smalIcK convenience centers and larger f SbnPQ%g centers, on the other hand, it may be that thesc� convsniencn stores may be developed A addition to continued devaloyment of neighborhood commercial centers. z In nm believe at t .is me that anyone can say Mich we com%zrcial merchenMing will go. Further, it mu5t be acknowledged that t% landanners of this particular Pie= A property are PHUZYMY MUMPIn reaMOMMA Kovelopers, and tic laM QQ lunst ta them) has a grca .nn valre as muiM.We Yo2idence property than as in 2vwmatior, knee nc crystal boll hav yet revealed Mat WK avenonally Kappen to this .2-acre tract, (oven though Y do not MAYe"n the entire tnow" oil! ever be used for no change W� madc in An eyinin; commerevol soning, aM that the land be jonmitti? Cc Sovelop M Ma own timT. with possible ehar ex 3n some gortions Wavac! Ln srltip2a residential in tow M. • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application l / Application No. l� Street Location of Property Lakeside Avenue Legal Description of Property See attached Exhibit "A" Owner: Emil R. Engberg Address 3242 Aldrich Avenue North,Mpls ,Mn. Telephone No. 521-2959 Applicant: G--Lad F Miller Address 3984 Alabama Avenue,St . Louis Park Construction Co. Telephone No. 929-2232 Type of Request: X Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Rezoning of above described property�to multiple family residence R-5 Reason for Request Construction of multiple family residence upon above described property. GLAD 9 MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO . Fee $ 25.00 Receipt No. 21532 A15plicant peril 1 5 . 1968 Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration T) May 2, 1968 dune 17, 1968 June 6, 1968 August 5, 1968 1 fi-G l t l 1968 August 9� �5 %HNN7#2y Lc, q`� PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION �t�Car Approved Denied�l this '�� day of 19 r; , subject to-the following conditions _ _ M � � � � - I Wad and M111oz vnnoo .:,Mon Co , Usonription of Rograst : Rezoning from R-1 (Singic Family Residence) to P-1 (Multiple Family Romidence) . property BunMed Ay haVezide Avenue, Highway Vo, 100 , and 7win Lake (legal description an file) Owner of Araperty Emil Engberg BACKGR9C'f D- 1) The property in question is now occupied by the Twin Lake swinmirl scvch, and ccnsists of approximately 8.09 acrcs (352, 227 sqft- ) , POINY3 TO BE CONSIDE22D ! 1) This property was recommendat Tor cpen space usage (private) base& on the existence of the swimming beach, apparently with the Wought that such vsc would continue indefinitely. The upgrading a? Highway ?100 to onpressway status in the next fow years will Aangs tic access to the area, and the future circulation pattern' have not yet been fixed,. 3) The zonWq for the area reconme"dW for the area to the north of this prapert.y b;�- ion was to R-2 (duplex) and h,4 Q story multiple) chazoilications. This same maning haz bean caMed tb.ro-jq-.c,, ;Ty the Council an the prapoocd zoning map. 1) 1 would cuqgnst to the Covoinsion that the public hearing hzz. ,.; bc:.,en 'met for this revenlag request be held, and comments gathered from those portico notified of the hearing, and that the hoaring be cinzed for consideration by the Cowniosion, This will enabie the Staff sufficient time to examine the past planning proposals for the area and the concepts Wich underly this planning, and also to • research the likely future development of the area. .•y f I i January 14, 1969 MEMORANDUM TO: City of Brooklyn Center FROM: Howard Dahlgren, Midwest Planning and Research, Inc. SUBJECT: Development alternatives for existing commercial park operation in extreme southwest corner of the city. The purpose of this memo is to assist the City of Brooklyn Center in evaluating the appropriate use of a parcel of land in the far southwest corner of the city. This parcel contains 8.5 acres and is currently zoned "0-2" . The property in question has been previously used as a commercially operated beach and park facility utili- zing its frontage on the lake to the west. We understand that the city has recently been approached with a proposition to develop the property for multiple dwelling purposes. The question is whether or not this use or some other use would be most appropriate in terms of the overall interests of the city and the specific neighborhood in the area. Review of the Comprehensive Plan as proposed in a report dated July 1, 1965, in- dicates the property in question appears as a proposed public open space. The Plan does not specify the intended use of the park or the specific activities to be included. In discussion of the southwest neighborhood, we found that the report notes: 1 . It is small - 25 acres now zoned residential. 2. It is isolated from the neighborhood's main living areas by railroad and industry. 3. It is also isolated from both Northport and Lakeview Elementary Schools there- by requiring bussing. 4. It is situated next to an extensive heavy industry - the pole treatment plant. The area's location next to Twin Lake is an advantage but this is small in relation to the other disadvantages. It seems likely that these disadvantages will eventually cause the area's untimely deterioration - especially if further industrial development occurs between the existing housing and France Avenue. If this further industrial development happens, the only approach to the residential area will be through an industrial district - an extremely undesirable situation. i However, we feel that with the construction of the interchange at France Avenue and with the existing and future industrial development outlined in this report that this area would constitute an excellent location for good quality multiple dwellings. We were given to understand that it is the policy of Brooklyn Center to acquire as much waterfront property in the city as possible. We certainly commend the city on this policy in view of the limited waterfront potential available. We further understand that the property in question has been examined by the city with the decision that it is not appropriate for the permanent maintenance of a public facility. We are assuming then that the use of the property for public bathing facilities is not to be considered. Based on the examination of the site, its general development pattern, its existing and future vehicular access, and the waterfront situation existing and proposed, we suggest the following solution: 1 . It is important to consider during the next 50 year period, the ultimate de- velopment of a parkway along the east side of Twin Lakes, a portion which exists in the form of Twin Lake Avenue. It is our recommendation that Twin Lake Avenue be extended southerly through the property in question, and that a service road be ultimately developed along the southern side of the property extending to the proposed interchange of France Avenue and Highway 100. It would seem appropriate in considering the future development of the site, the possibility of "planned unit development" for this property and that the lakeshore in question be dedicated to the city with the developer including this area in computing the density of the development. Likewise, it would be reasonable in our opinion, to expect the developer to extend the public street, (Twin Lake Avenue) south through the property as part of the development plan. The development of such a road will allow the primary access to the multiple dwelling area via the circumferential road around the southeast side of the site. This will reduce the impact of traffic created by the multiple development upon single family neighborhoods during the interim development stage. Future planning of the area should reduce traffic on Lake Breeze Avenue which runs through the middle of the residential area. Traffic should be encouraged to proceed around the total area via the parkway ultimately extending northerly around the east side of Twin Lake. It is our anticipation that over an extended period of time such a parkway might find a terminus to the northeast across the tracks, or perhaps to the northwest crossing the channel and extending into the City of Crystal . Whether this occurs in the relatively near future is not important, and obviously such a parkway would enhance the aesthetic and functional value of the lakeside open space to the citizens of Brooklyn Center and the immediate region. You will note that there appears to be extensive right-of-way north of the travelled portions of Highway 100 south of the property in question which might be available for extending the roadway from Twi:) Lake Avenue easterly to the interchange at France and Highway 100. -2- We have examined the proposed interchange design furnished to us by the city, dated March, 1965. The proposal is for a folded diamond which will require that the right- of-way be extended to the west into existing neighborhoods. This would obviously interfere with the extension of the parkway along the south and southeasterly side of the area in question. We feel that one should consider the possibility of moving the grade separation further southwest, thus enabling the development of a diamond inter- change which would substantially reduce the intrusion into the area. This revision would allow an interchange similar to the one shown on the comprehensive plan. With the moving of the interchange to the southwest and use of the diamond, this will substantially improve the alignment of France Avenue to the north and allow the extension of the proposed parkway in better relationship to the interchange. It would seem to us that the interchange should emphasize the continuing nature of France Avenue rather than the direction of traffic onto Lake Breeze Avenue. The impact of France Avenue with traffic being directed onto Lake Breeze Avenue, is misleading to the public and will be a very deleterious influence to the existing single family residential and multiple dwelling use of the area. Should the city desire further investigati6n.as to the location and design of the interchange, we would be happy to work with you further. We reviewed the possibility of using property in question for park and open space purposes without the operation of a prominent beach facility. We feel, however, that the property located as it is with relationship to the City of Brooklyn Center, does not represent an investment which would serve the city as a whole and would be of little value to the overall park system. It would seem to us that as an investment to serve only the immediate area it is out of scale with the demand of the small isolated area contiguous to the north. It would seem to us that the only reasonable possibility for the continued use of the land as a public open space would be action on a larger agency encompassing an interest well beyond the scope of the interests of Brooklyn Center such as the county or a metropolitan agency. It is important for the city to also recognize that the tax potential from apartment development in many cases exceeds that of industrial development on an acreage basis. The trend toward per capita tax return increases the significance of higher density multiple development vs. industrial development. It is recognized that the area in- cluding the property in question could be developed for industrial purposes over a period of time. It is most important, however, to recognize that industrial development has practically no relationship to the lake frontage and its future parkway potential. In our opinion the development of the lakeside park strip and parkway will have a tremen- dous impact on the quality and livability of the multiple units built in the area. In summary, we feel that the compatibility and mutual benefit inherent in the parkway lake frontage development and apartment uses are most important considerations upon • -3- which to base the land use decision. Combined with other factors we feel strongly that this is the right decision. Extreme care should be taken in the evaluation of the property development plan. Our examination of the very sketchy plan submitted to the city would indicate that a for more imaginative approach can be prepared consistent with the recommendation made in this memo. Should you desire, we would be happy to review any planned unit development proposals that may be submitted in the future, with the intention of assisting the developer and the city to arrive at a development plan that would maximize the protection to the existing developments in the area and development of the parks and parkway system proposed. Another possibility that the city might well be interested in would be the development of a "high-rise" development which in this case could have the following benefits: 1 . Maximize the retention of open space beneficial to the contiguous development to the north and the park concept proposed in this memo. 2. Function as a major structure in the southwesterly gateway to the Gity of Brooklyn Center. • It is our opinion that sites such as the property in question contiguous to the major open space, in this case provided principally by the lake and highway right-of-way represent an obvious potential for the aesthetic and functional qualities of high-rise structures. -4- w ' 1� � ` 1 �I. TWIM LANE. �.. R " Two L♦Kt Property in question S ggested arkway - BROOKLYN CENTER MINNESOTA » '. • • I I • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No.-� 68044 Street Location of Property Legal Description of Property Owner: E P Address t Telephone No. Applicant: { - y Address Telephone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance y/ Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request 1 _ Reason for Request S � 1D 14 X- Fee $ a t; 17 Receipt No. 25340 1 Applicant _ Z-, S' ate Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration Septeraber 5, 1,068 September 9, 1968 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION roved Denied this S day of 19 subject to the following conditions M CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68021 Street Location of Property Southwest corner of the intersection of France Avenue and Highway No. Legal Description of Property Tract A, R.L.S. #1082 and Parcel 2910, ,Section 10. Owner: Norman Chazin Address 5217 Wayzata Boulevard Telephone No. Applicant: Same Address Telephone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance X Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Approval of a preliminary plat of "Shell ' s Brooklyn Center 2nd Addition" Reason for Request Fee $26.00 Receipt No. 25082 Applicant June 6. 1968 Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved_, Denied ___�__._ this day of 19 Z ' , subject to the following conditions `� 1 ccrver of the r r r as m vmt CIE W7 CITY OF BP.00KLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68051 Street Location of Property Co. Road #10 and Hwy. #100 (Sally. Corner) Legal Description of Property Tracts B and C, Reg. Land Survey No. 1161 and Tract G, Rea. Land Survey No. 936. Owner: Dayton Development Co. Address 534 Roanoke Building Telephone No. 339-3611 Applicant: Dayton Development Co. Address Telephone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance Subdivision Approval x Other Description of Request To combine LTracts B, C, and G into one parcel, by renlattina into a Rea. Land Survey. Reason for Request Fee $ 26.00 G Receipt No. 25628 Applicant V:... Date D .tes of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration PLANNING COMMISSION RECOM14ENDATION Approved Denied this / _ day of , 19 d , subject to the following conditions .... 4. rY i CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68068 Street Location of Property Between 5th St and Camden Avenue at 68th Avenue Legal Description of Property _ Part of Lot 23, Aud. Sub. #k310 Owner: Tony Pendzimaz Address Telephone No. Applicant: Tony Pendzimaz Address Albertville, Minnesota Telephone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance X Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Approval of preliminary plat "Bing' s Addition" Reason for Request Fee $ $30.00 Receipt No. 25964 9Appli?�t November 21, 1968 Date r-`-es of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ,-, Approved � — Denied this ,5 day of 19 6 ""-' subject to the following conditions 401 th and ' . .. . Tiny Ot _ . jot wazer i:Jw; 3 'lqc„ 1 f, CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68oA5 bounded by Bryant, 66th, Caffi0eri Avenues, and Street Location of Property Interstate ¢#94 Legal Description of Property Lots 6 and 8, Mendenhall' s Outlots (except highway) ; Outlots A and B, Wiensch 1st Addition; the south 1/5 of the east 1/2 of Lot 1, Mendenhall ' s Outlots. Owner: Address Telephone No. Ken Nordling Applicant: and Gus Welter Address 9944 Harriet Ave. So. Telephone No. 881-8114 Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance X Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request_Approval of the preliminary plat of "Nordling and Welter Addition Reason for Request Fee $ 26.00 Receipt No. 25338 Applicant July 26, 1968 Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration Septc�.nber 5, 1068 September 9, 1968 September 16, 1968 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approve _ Denied this day of �- s y _ S 19 , subject to the following conditions �� x a . . CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68023 Street Location of Property vicinity of 54th & Russell Avenues Legal Description of Property Stanley & Ruth Edling; Richard Kauffmann; Esther Ryden Owner: / Address Telephone No. Applicant: Ethel Magnuson, agent Address 3800 Fremont Ave. No. Telephone No. 529-9615 Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance X Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Approval of the preliminary plat of "Ryden 's 4th Addition" . Reason for Rerp-Lest Fee $ 30.00 Receipt No. 25081 & 253_0() Applicant` May 23, 1968 Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved , Denied this = day of .j—c.> '�- 19 / , subject to the following conditions .. ;.y� i , t - �: . • ,. ,:. �. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68050 Street Location of Property Hwy. #152, Co. Road #10 and Xerxes Ave. No. Legal Description of Property Tract A, Reg. Land Survey No. 1142. Owner: Dayton Development Co. Address 534 Roanoke Building Telephone No. 339-3611 Applicant: Dayton Development Co. Address Telephone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance Subdivision Approval x Other Description of Request Platting a new Reg. Land Survey dividing Tract A into two tracts. Reason for Request Fee $ 27.00 Receipt No. 25628 Applicant ✓-�+ P.�••�.►t Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved a/ Denied this % day of 19 ( ' subject to the following conditions CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68049 Street Location of Property Jierxes Ave. No. and Co. Road #10 (NEly. Corner) Legal Description of Property Tract B, Rea. Land survey No. 1211 Owner: Dayton Development Co- Address 534 Roanoke Building Telephone No. 339-3611 Applicant: Dayton Development Co. Address Telephone No. _ Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance Subdivision Approval x Other Description of Request_ Platting of a new Reg. Land survey dividing Tract B into two tracts. Reason for Request Fee $ 27.00 Receipt No. 25628 Applicant PP ✓,s P►c�•eQs rfi Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved ✓ Denied this - day of . 19 17S,' , subject to the following conditions CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68019 Street Location of Property Northeast quadrant - 65th & Willow Lane Legal Description of Property Lot 1, Block 1, Farr' s lst Addition Owner: Darrel Farr Address Rt. 3, Box 231, Osseo, Minnesota Telephone No. Applicant: same Address Telephone No. Type of Request: x _ Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request RQzoning from R-1 (Single Family Fesidence,) to R-5 (Multiple Family Residence) Reason for Request Fee $ 25.00 Receipt No. 24535 Applica t Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration May 2, 1968 may 13, 1968 May 20, 1968 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved .Denied this day of 19 - subject to the following conditions __ _... _.. _�. _ _. i � _ . Cd A Darrel Family of 65t-h a-ln�! Lane (Lot. Owner o-: L POINTS TO iaade' two Previouo • this propcxty to a multiple fzati.3-Y residca-ice ;:Aassification. One of these was in the summer of 10,63, -4,12e otlier in the 0.1- 0.n both OCC.IS4CIIS, the rc--.-)X,.v.sbA rezoning w,v,, )---Nr bof:ll the Coxiiwissioii z:nej Cour-cil. Stibsequent -a ;C'." -n-iaoj, m.r. rarr iaropo—ty by the and to 4 hq West oc' was Zo2? ox ;*Plax residential aD-A Council have I'), -- os- om re- p u -I of- R-•1 -,a UA noc th,-., x7hich -x.fd, and comments E; h _:a' 1 c and .16. t kZ cz tb — ' 530 to researc,".1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER zoning Application APP. No..�.r Street Location of Property 65th and Osseo Road North Legal Description of Property Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 6, and Lots �l and 2, Block 5, Brooklane Addition; Parcel 2330 and 2310, Aud. Sub. 25 (except Owner: Name Dudley, Plummer., Bottelson Address East 165' ) Hanuska, Roger Peterson, Roy Peterson, Telephone Paul Deboer Applicant: Richard A. Rockstad Address 7006 Osseo Road Telephone 561-6660 Type of Request: X Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Rezoning from R-1 (Single Family Residence) to B-2 (Regional Business) . Reason for Request To obtain zoning for the following future businesses: P.D.Q. Food Store; Embers Restaurant; Mobil Oil Service Statiob Fee $ 25.00 Receipt No. 24229 6—Z I Applicant D ate Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration March 7, 1968 May 73, 1968 April 25, 1968 duly 8, 1968 PLANNING COMMISSION�RECOMMENDATION On the z2g of J r , l9d , the request represented Y P by this petition was approved 1sapprove subject to the following conditions. (circ n-- r n n-e v- A.Q '3 ' R a .,.�. ......a .. a.r...�..'• " ._P AV 40nj -� Sc On firm. } 07 7. 152 pp -�Awrjva J fir; yt 6 '7 • I I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68038 Street Location of Property Bounded by Irving Avenue, 71st Avenue, Humboldt Avenue and 70th Avenue (extended) Legal Description of Property Lot 4i� :Block 1, Horbal Addition i Owner: John Horbal Address 1401 - 69th Avenue North Telephone No. Applicant: Same Address Telephone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance x Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Approval of the preliminary plat of "Jessie' s Addition" . Reason for Request Fee $ 40.00 Receipt No. 25364 Applicant Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration August 1, 1968 August 5, 1968 i PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION r 6;4 Approved ✓` Denied this /' — day of (�Z , 19 _, subject to the following conditions i I I I i i CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68033 Street Location of Property south of 73rd Avenue between Lyndale and Camden Avenues Legal Description of Property Part of Lots 31, 32, and 33, Auditor' s Subdivision No. 309 Owner: Address Telephone No. Camden Park Church of Applicant: the Nazarene Address Telephone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance x Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Approval of the preliminary plat of "Nazarene Addition" . Reason for Request Fee $ 32.00 Receipt No. 2520 Applicant Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration July 18, 1968 July R2, 1968 August 5, 1968 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved .:' Denied this / _day of 19 subject to the following conditions F w R k pl f S. ', . CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68046 Street Location of Property bounded generally by Colfax, 59th, Bryant, and 60th Avenues Legal Description of Property Lots 1 through 8, Block 3, Frank Burch' s Addition; Part of Lot 1, Section 1, T118,R21 Owner: Mrs. Andrew Boyer, Address et.al. Telephone No. Applicant: .Mrs_ Andre-w Royer Address 5921 Bryant Avenue Telephone No. 561-4519 Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance x Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Approval of a preliminary plat of a Registered —Land Survey. Reason for Request To rearrange the boundary lines of all the lots in this block and create 8 new building lots . Fee $ 42.00 � Receipt No. 25520 Applicant August 14, 1968 Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration September „ 1968 6cptember 9, 1968 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved 0.° Denied this �� day of 1 subject to the following conditions CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER zoning Application Application No. 68022 Street Location of Property northeast quadrant of FAI #94 and Osseo Road Legal Description of Property legal description on file Owner: Velie Motor Co. Address 1300 West Lake Street Telephone No. 822-2103 Applicant: Charles Velie Jr. Address same Telephone No. Type of' Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance x _Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Approval of the preliminary plat of "Velie —Addition ' Reason for RQciiiPs t Fee $ 26.00 Receipt No. 25116 Applicant June 10, 1968 Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration June 27, 1968 July 8, 1968 June 6, 1968 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved ,, Denied this day of j 11.E°� , Z„ , subject to the following conditions Y � � r , Velie Addition: Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 3, except part taken for highway purposes; Lots 7, 8, 9, and 10, and the north one foot of Lot 6, Block 2, and Halifax Avenue adjacent to said lots, all in Sunrise Manor, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also Tract B, Registered Land Survey ##370 and the South 376. 19 feet lying West of the East 491. 91 feet of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 595, as measured at right angles from the South and East line of said Tract A; all according to the files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. ..... .......... I 1 ,' �3:�._ !':r :•. : � :.,;:� '.' .;.;: i ire;±. + '��::�`:�' C.O. ? Dwwor! "Wov file) 0 ohe rvs Motor S17 Ty VOICE% 1 r • •��.� . ,, . �,,- .. � ��r,�: < .. ..t.x.31 }.; .. _ _:l�v, i � � _. .. • r 4f CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68041 bounded by Bryant, 66th, Camden Avenues, Street Location of Property _ and Interstate #94 Legal Description of Property Lots 6 and 8. Mendenhallas Outlots (except highway) ; Outlots A and B, Wiensch lst Addition; the south 1/5th of Lht east 1/2 of Lot 1, Mendenhall ' s Outlots Owner: Address Telephone No. Applicant: _Ken Nordling & Gus Address 9944 Harriet Ave. So. Welter Telephone No. 881-8114 Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance Subdivision Approval X Other -Plan Approval Description of Request,Approval of the site and building plans of an apartment development. Reason for Request Fee $ 10.00 Receipt No. 25339 Applicant July 18, 1968 Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration August 1, 1968 August 5, 1968 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION -Z Approved Denied this / day of 19 _,;,,_, subject to the following conditions WAN= WAUSSIU.'I Simm" Application No. ApplicanW Douglas johnstan location: 65t1i a--rid Caz+idien Amenue North pzqnark: Amen site and suAding Plans foc Wypawz Park Apts. The Men Ya2 tab W at the Wavember 7. 1974 meeting since the npplicant won not ywassak. Thn applicant prcponew the relocation W the rantal office, frarli 'e ho manaUerlz apartynat, (freeztanding) building at 65th and Camden, to the reu• eatina builling lo anted on the Of' WK-) SitC--' . He also tentativcly prQ2=as to convert can garage Opace, attaChed to the recreation builaing, to an entrance to the proposed office. The intent is to jantraljoa the rental a2fice with is supervisory office for tha recruntion Wilding. site yjan Von ?No 21G unit complez ohows 433 garking spaces; thus, using one yonago for an ont-1-anc:.c-, would leave a balance, of 432 - the nmouM required. There arn a uvwYr� M Wntanance related items which should be snwApinq PC parking spacos, upgrading grOenatrivs- particularly Mong candan ova. , and two razoval of a number of M�A2 rod sign structures. Asyuring ti.onvonOTA� o7aywL - is particylarly important, Ance the Mal POAML DA Cho Onk)IOX would change frm'-, 6:5."t"a tt') MAGanonlay , W� to the east of Coolua to 0-2, thusz there is =Ah Y Onn Approval ynnl� WI �Wjjowt to the conditions tnay. prier to tM-, insuanan o! a WARWO 0=10 the parkinq areas will he apVrap- riately =Gonlyoa � aW nignery will bn lxwaght Wks confarmancl-.� UAW tan OYMAWn, Z� jAnwWned by the M%ning ana WSPOCAUa %parMant. • Application No. WOOL ?ongjas A. johnolon Raqrezt- --i-Id I�uildina- plans TNS applicano propozes tha relocation of the rental office, fra-M th, na,,ge=, s nysKkuank building at G5th and CaLdea, to the recreaMen MIGIng located an thn wast side of the site. Hn also tentetivuly prap*was to convert one garage space, attached p, the rayyenhion buildlAy, to an antranco to the yroposed office. The intent Q to MMWAM M rOntal Offics with a SUPOrviscry office for ths rncrec&SA buildimg The sitc pion Ann tte 2IG unQ complex shows 633 parking spaces; thus, using one gamage for an entrance way unuld leave a balance of 432 - the annnot Wegalred. There amn a numoso wo saintennace related items which should be accomplishad2 strip%S of parking ngacen.„°:. upgraaing greenstrips- particularly Ave, , enA the removal of a number W nonconlarming Gigns and sign structures. Ansuring conformiag aignary is particularlY important, since the focal point of Me . change Nom 65th to Camden. incidentally, We zvning to the east of Camden in C-2; thus, there is merit in the reorientation. .Apyrc-ii-al 02 wubj,ct to the conditions that, prior to the issuance uf a huilding parmit: the parking areas will be approp- riataLy restripad anj aij signery will be brought into conformance with the azaiwance, as jawerninal by the Planning and Xnapection • Depaxtonnt. i i i � � . • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68020 Street Location of Property _.Woodbine Lane to 73rd Avenue, on the west side of Humboldt Avenue Legal Description of Property South 400 feet of the North 433 feet of the NE4 of the SE4 of Section 26, T. 119 R21 Owner: Jack W. Arvidson Address 3570 Polk Street NE - Mpls. Telephone No. 781-4542 Applicant: same Address Telephone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance X Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request_ Approval of the preliminary subdivision design (including variance) for the above property. Reason for Request Fee $ 25.00 + 3.00 $28. total Receipt No. 24781 Applicant Appil 26, 1968 Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration June 6, 1968 dune 17, 1968 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION approved ,f Denied this day of 19 :_ , subject to the following conditions CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68073 Street Location of Property 72nd to Shingle Creek on Osseo Road Legal Description of Property Parcels 5400, 5600, 5800, 6010 and 6224, Auditor's Subdivision No. 57 Owner: The Dietrich Co. Address 5300 - 80th Avenue North Telephone No. �Yq 33.3 t Applicant: Same Address Telephone No. Type of Request: X Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Rezone from R-3 to R-5. Reason for Request Fee $ 75.00 26166 Receipt No. Applicant December 11, 1968 Date lL -roc-,,a.� 6, f`fla`7 Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration 7aly i� i`sG `) �CuTi.�V^zf) Td x.t47 .�IEtT 7 i/a 7L' .�. •L °t.' p..<��"o � PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved Denied this day of 19 subject to the following conditions I I TELEPHONE 544-3331 THE DIETRICH CO. 5300 GLENWOOD AVENUE NORTH-GOLDEN VALLEY,MINNESOTA 55422 January 15, 1970 Mr. Haarman Secretary of Planning Commission 7100 Osseo Road Brooklyn Center, Minnesota Dear Mr. Haarman: The Dietrich Co. wishes to withdraw the petition for the rezoning of the properties at 71st and Osseo Road that has been before the planning commission for somewhat over a year. . As I mentioned during our telephone conversation, our options on one of the properties has expired and even though it looks like the owner would extend the option for a short period of time we do not feel that the money market will improve enough in the near future to justify the possibility of our obtaining zoning and then being forced to let it drop into the hands of other people who may not live up to the representations that we have made. We wish to thank you for the time, effort and courtesy that you, the various committee's and the planning commission extended to us and we hope that one day we can follow through on some other project in Brooklyn Center. Sincerely yours, The Dietrich Co. a Alk -A 60 Duane Dietrich, ice t residen DD/jh I CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 68081 Street Location of Property Legal Description of Property Part of outlots+.+C ?=A D, 'Twig -Cities Interchange Park Addition. Owner: Address _ Telephone No. Applicant: City of Brooklyn Cente4dress 7100 Osseo. Road Telephone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance x Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Apprrooyal of a proposed Registeged Land Survey. Reason for Request Fee $ None Receipt No. Applicant December 21, 1968 Date Dates of P.C. C_onsideration Dates of Council Consideration PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 6 A roved Denied this day of 19 , subject to the following conditions. Chairman A/1T77L?fTTT L/7/!fT/NAT ^ r � � ... / I ... i i . . ... -' ... ..