The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1975 PC Apps C :i'f OF BRCO XLYIT CENTER. Planning Cormis ;ion Application Application No. 75013 Street Location of Property Brooklyn Boulevard and County Road 10 Legal Description of Property Tract A, R.L.S . No. 1262 Owner Dayton Hudson PropertiesF3dI—.e.ss I.D.S . Center, Mpls. , MN. 55402 Telephone No. 370-6495 Applicant Titus, Inc. Address 6550 York Avenue So. , Edina. MN. 5543 Telep'zone No. 925-4494 Type of Requests Rezoning Subdivision Approval Variance X Site & Bldg. Plans special Use Other Permit Description and Reason for Request: Site and building plan approval for a retail center Fee $ 25.00 Receipt No. 41736 ti--- pplicant Date PLAN WING COMIAISSIOIT FECOMMEMATIO"d Dates of P.C. Considerations Approved Denied _ this _ day of 19 , subject to the following conditions-. chairman j4 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER izzz Planning Commission Application Application No. 7's^d/-3 Street Location of Property BROOKLYN BLVD_ COUNTY ROAD 10 Legal Description of E•: opert; RLS #1262 TRACT A SELLER: OMMMX DAYTON HUDSON PROPERTIES ?`.d: .'easI.D.S. . 02 Telephoue No. 370 M � Applicant TITUS, INC. Address6550 YORK AVE. SOS. , _EDINA, MN.55435 Teleah--nfe No. 925-4494 Type of Request: Rezoning Subdivizion Ap-roval Variance _ Site & Bldg. Plans Special Use � O e PeMit Description and Reason for Request: Fee Receip•c No. nXt.•l.icant Date PLANNING COMM?S S I ON P.E LOMMEELMATI QN Dates of P.C. Consideration: Approved Denied this day of 19 , subJect to the following connitions:�—._._.._.._ Chairman — .. - - - - - - _. - - -- - -- ._- - _ — -- - - -• - - - - -- - . . - .. ,. , . . . . .. .._ ... ... ... . . . _,.. t• • � .. •. .. �1 1+:.. ... .: � .. - _ .... ,. ........ ..[.,Lfri1 :. E ,; �, 1, ... ' � .. .... .K� ..v....... _ _., . . . C-'T*f OF DROOIXLYI? CENTER Planning Comnis_;.;.on A,pp.1 icat✓ion 75012 Street Location of Property Brooklyn Boulevard and County Road 10 Legal Description of Property Tract A, R.L.S . No. 1262 owner Dayton Hudson Properties Ad I.D.S . Center, Mpis. , _Minn. Telep on No. 370-6495 - Applicant Titus, Inc. A::dress 6550 York Avenue So. Edina, 55435 Telep'zon:? Rio. 925-4494 Type of Request: X Rezoning Variance Site & :Oldg. plajI3 Special Use 0ULiar Permit Description and Reason for Re jue:as Rezone from C1-A (Service/Office) to C2 (Commerce) Fee $� 75.00 Receipt zo. 41735 A,ppli.ca-t Data PLANNING COt -AISSIOU I'ECOMUMENDAT.g OTd Dates of P.C. Considerations 5 - 2 `L -7.S 7,K 6[ 41 2 7 tic>` /Cli *C Glctf� R '7� /C . 75 Approved D o n i e d � this Clay or 19 subje=ct to the fo?IOWI-�.�g cond.i.ti.ons s — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — P. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTERS Planning Commission Application Application No. 75033 Street Location of Property North of 69th Avenue North and west of Irvin venue ex en Ue Legal Description of Property Parcel 3200, 3400. and 3600. S26, Township 119, Range 21 Lowry Condominium and Owner Townhouses, Inc. Add. ess 11248 Crooked Lake Blvd—Conn Rap ds 55303 Telephone No. 427-4060 Applicant Same Address_ Same Copies of notices to: Telephone No. Suburban Engr, Wayne Tauer - 6875 Highway 65, Mpls. 55432 (571-6066 Type of Request; Rezoning _ Subdivision Aprroval variance Site & Bldg. Plans Special Use Other Permit Description and Reason for Request: Preliminary Plat Fee $ _ / Receipt No. 42416 Applicant Date PLANNING COMMISSION F:ECOMMENDATION Dates of P.C. Consideration: Approved Denied this II day of 19 subject to the following conditions: 610 ( Chairman Main Office 571.6066 + UBURBAN 6875 Highway No. 65 N. E. F NGINF-ERING Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 I NC. South Office 890-6510 Civil, Municipal & Environmental Engineering 1101 Cliff Road Land Surveying • Land Planning • Soil Testing Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 August 25, 1975 That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 119, Range 21 , Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter, distant 738.48 feet easterly of the south- west corner of said Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter; thence easterly, along said south line, 244.73 feet; thence northerly, parallel with the west line of said Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter, 557.89 feet; thence westerly a distance of 244.73 feet to a point on a line drawn northerly of the point of beginning and parallel with the west line of said Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter, said point distant 559.16 feet northerly of the point of beginning; thence southerly, along last described parallel line, 559.16 feet to the point of be- ginning. Subject to 69th Avenue North and other easements of record, if any. Robert Minder, Reg. Eng. E. A. Rathbun, Reg. Surv. John F.Dwyer,Reg. Surv. Charles L. Lenthe, Reg. Eng. Wm. E. Jensen, Reg. Eng. Wm. K. Meyer, Reg. Eng. Wm. E. Price, Reg. Eng. H.William Rogers,Reg.Surv. Applicant: Richard MUM The Lawry Condomini iii , and Townhouses, Be. Locativiz Westerly Gf irving Avenue Morth (proposed) ; Easterly of 621 Avenue North termination; and Northerly of 69th Avenue Horth. Reqvesu ' �11` pi-el- P'f'at This is an initial plot pospys"ny Kno 0-1 190. There are several ramifications which to will be prepared to disauss in MKI 1 . The plat does not cospMend KvIng Avenue extended to 69th Avenue North; rather, it would jD0 691 Maun. Thus, a portion of Ming Avenue dedicated from the Horbal Addition to the east is subject to vacation. (30 ft, was dedicated frus 69th Man* Hurth to a point near 70th Avenue.) 2. That portion of thn Harbal Addition which would revert and which is E, site of Apartnents would expand the apartnent site and creato a direct abatannt of R-5 to R-1 . The ordinance requires scraenkg in thns Muntlun. We will be prepared to discuss this Mr M% in light K M pending per'a orma;lce aqree.ri:sit and cash escrow still Kid on the apartwont Me 3, the City Engkoer is nnalyviAo U-ne nec;d. addvit-,,ona.1 dedica- tion of land Vr 69th Avenuo QVIty' Rold 130) right-of-way. 4. We PVwPCse this is an opportunity to consider changing the designation of 69Y Avenue and will be preparY to discmss it further, Approval would be subject to at least the following: a, Final Plat is subject to review by the City Engineer. K Final Plat is swbjec,, of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. c . The Subdivlslo"t kgreeiiient shall comprehend provision for opaque screening, along the easterly portion of the Subdivision adjacent to proposed Lot 1 , which is consistent with ordinance requirements and as approved Q the City Engineer, ::; ;_ h�, � � - ,.:, �.. .. �,�. � E�z _. . w.,_..., i � �g ? .: ,- j .: i .,. . � '� ,_ � w � �cv' r .; .. v :� ... .. ...__,_.--_.. ,._ T � � � — �� v � _ :y = .. . �:, _.�, �, ,. �, .:. ,� _._ � u _.,e�. �...... „__�_� .� a. ,. _ .. � ,.. - ,. f ,;. � i _ ., ,. ._ • s • a' CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER l PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING APPLICATION Application No. 75045 Please Print Clearly or Type Street Location of Property ShingleCreek Parkway and Summit Drive North Legal Description of Property See enclosed preliminary plat Owner Tropicana Holding Company and Consolidated Financial Corporation Address 6100S ummit Drive North Phone No. 561-7350 Applicant Brooklyn Center Industrial Park Address 6100 Summit Drive North Phone No. 561-7350 Type of Request: x Rezoning Subdivision Approval Variance Site & Bldg. Plan Approval Special Use Permit Other: Description of Request: Rezone approximately 31 acres from I- 1 to C-2 Fee $ 75. 00 Receipt No. 42814- iP Applicants Signature November ae PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Dates of P.C. Consideration: Approved Denied this day of 19 subject to the follow- ing conditions: rVV L QChairman 1� CITY COUNCIL ACTION PPPPP' CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430 PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING APPLICATION FOR SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL Prior to submission of an application for plan review and approval , prospective applicants should arrange an informational meeting with the Planning staff to discuss preliminary plans and to become familiarized with applicable ordinance and policy provisions. Three (3) copies of the following documents and information shall be submitted, at least 14 days prior to the date of the regular Commission meeting, concurrent with filing the application (required documents must be consistent with ordinance and policy provisions before an application may be accepted) : 1 . A certified site survey drawing by a registered engineer or land surveyor showing pertinent existing condition, accurately dimensioned. 2.* An accurately scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating: a) parking layouts including access provisions; b) designations and locations of accessory buildings; c) fences, walls or other screening, including heights and type of material ; d) outside lighting provisions, type and location; e) curbing. 3.* A landscape plan showing areas to be sodded or seeded; location, size and species of trees and shrubbery. 4.* Building floor plans, elevations, sections and specifications, including materials proposed. 5.* Existing and'proposed land elevations, drainage provisions, and utility provisions. 6o Additional drawings, plans or information deemed necessary by the Secretary. *Must be prepared by a registered architect or person registered with the State Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers and Land Surveyors, and said drawings/plans shall be so certified. NOTE: Upon approval of plans by the Council and prior to issuance of permits, a Performance Agreement as to approved site improvements and a supporting financial guarantee, in an amount to be determined by the City, are required. Acceptable financial instruments include cash escrow; certificate of deposit; and performance bond. Copies of the Zoning Ordinance may be obtained from the Administrative Office. Questions should be directed to the Department of Planning and Inspection. P/I Form No. 19 PLANNING COMMISSION INFORMATION SHEET Application No. 75045 • Applicant: Brooklyn Center Industrial Park, Inc. Location : South of I-94, North of Summit Drive, West of Earle Brown Drive Request: Rezoning The item was intially heard on December 11, 1975 when it was tabled to enable development of additional information and recommendations as to the proper extent of any rezoning in light of: 1) traffic generation and in- tensity; 2) the design and capacity of existing and proposed public utilities; and 3) the Comprehensive Land Use Planning of the area. The item has been discussed at several subsequent meetings. The applicant proposes rezoning, from I-1 (Industrial Park) to C-2 (General Commerce) to facilitate development of the area with flexibility of general retail uses which are not permitted now in the I-1 district. A comprehensive traffic analysis and projection was contracted and we have reviewed it and will be prepared to discuss it in detail. A copy is enclosed. Our analysis of the new traffic study and other planning information re- lative to this area suggests : • 1. Rezoning any I-1 land to C-2 would be inappropriate. Such action would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Planning of the Brooklyn Center Industrial Park and with the basic premise of a planned industrial-commercial park, i.e. , to control the develop- ment and use intensity. 2. Rezoning the C-2 land (southerly and easterly of Summit Drive, and easterly of Earle Brown Drive) to I-1 would be appropriate. This would be consistent with the intent of a planned industrial park. The undesirable consequences of unrestricted commercial development, especially high-rise office buildings, are substantial. Restriction of commercial uses in the I-1 district via special use permit is definitely preferable, since each proposed use can be judged against the overall development of the park---using estab- lished special use criteria. Such rezoning would bring the bulk of the undeveloped portion of Brooklyn Center Industrial Park into conformance with a planned development area. 3. Provision for further commercial use development flexibility has merit, if proper controls are also applied. • The Ordinance can be amended to expand the permitted special commercial uses in the I-1 district to include general (retail) commerce. We have attached a memorandum explaining the present ordinance provisions for certain C-2 uses as special uses in the I-1 district. P.C. Information Sheet Cont' d. Application No. 75045 Page Two The issue then is whether the scope of the special commercial uses in the I-1 district should be expanded to include additional retail uses . If the decision is affirmative, the proper means is through ordinance amendment of the I-1 Special Uses, rather than through the proposed re- zoning from I-1 to C-2. Such an ._amendment, . combined with a rezoning of most of the C-2 land to I-1, should provide flexibility and control for future development. The recommendation is : 1. Recommend denial of the application. 2. Recommend rezoning of the designated undeveloped C-2 land to I-1. 3. Recommend consideration of an ordinance amendment to Section 35-330 (3) (f) which would include additional C-2 (retail) uses. It would be in order to convey such recommendations by resolution. We will have a draft resolution available. i •