Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978 PC Apps CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING APPLICATION Application No. 78050 Please Print Clearly or Type Street Location of Property 70th and Unity Avenues North Legal Description of Property Outlot D, The Ponds Owner Meadow Corporation, Duane H. Dietrich, President Address 7400 Candlewood Drive, Brooklyn Park Phone No. 425-8222 Applicant Same Address Phone No. Type of Request: Rezoning X Subdivision Approval Variance Site & Bldg, Plan Approval Special Use Permit Other: Description of Request: Preliminary Plat to be known as "The Ponds Plat 4" Fee $ 61 .00 Receipt No. 48731 Applicant's Si na r y 17,----1 g78 Date PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Dates of P.C. Consideration: Approved ��l Denied this ie, ._N day of � l.g '? N , subject to the follow- ing coed ',_' Gnsn airman . rrTv romlrTi ArTTMI CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430 PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING APPLICATION FOR SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL Prior to submission of an application for plan review and approval , prospective applicants should arrange an informational meeting with the Planning staff to discuss preliminary plans and to become familiarized with applicable ordinance and policy provisions. Three (3) copies of the following documents and information shall be submitted, at least 14 10�'" days prior to the date of the regular Commission meeting, concurrent with filing—the---appl—ication Trequired documents must be consistent with ordinance and policy provisions before an application may be accepted) : 1. A certified site survey drawing by a registered engineer or land surveyor showing pertinent existing condition, accurately dimensioned. 2.* An accurately scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating: a) parking layouts including access provisions; b) designations and locations of accessory buildings; c) fences, walls or other screening, including heights and type of material ; d) outside lighting provisions, type and location; e) curbing,, 3.* A landscape plan showing areas to be sodded or seeded; location, size and species of trees and shrubbery. 4.* Building floor plans, elevations, sections and specifications, including materials proposed. 5.* Existing and proposed land elevations, drainage provisions, and utility provisions. 6. Additional drawings, plans or information deemed necessary by the Secretary. *Must be prepared by a registered architect or person registered with the State Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers and Land Surveyors, and said drawings/plans shall be so certified. NOTE: Upon approval of plans by the Council and prior to issuance of permits, a Performance Agreement as to approved site improvements and a supporting financial guarantee, in an amount to be determined by the City, are required. Acceptable financial instruments include cash escrow; certificate of deposit; and performance bond. Copies of the Zoning Ordinance may be obtained from the Administrative Office. Questions should be directed to the Department of Planning and Inspection. P/1 Form No. 19 i Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 78050 Applicant: Meadow Corporation Location: Outlot D, The Ponds (approximate location, 71st and Unity Avenues North) Request: Preliminary Plat The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval for a The Ponds Plat 4 consisting of Outlot D of The Ponds Addition located at approximately 71st and Unity Avenues North. The platting is in conjunction with site and building plan review in Application No. 78048. The Engineering Department has reviewed the plat and will be prepared to comment. A public hearing has been scheduled and notices have been sent. Approval would be subject to at least the following conditions: 1 . Final plat is subject to review by the City Engineer. 2. Final plat is subject to the requirements of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 8-10-78 lk CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING APPLICATION Application No. 78048 Please Print Clearly or Type Street Location of Property 70th and Unity Avenues North Legal Description of Property Outlots C. D, and I, The Ponds Owner Meadow Address 7400 Candlewood Drive - Brooklyn Park, Inc. Phone No. 425-8222 Applicant Same Address Phone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Subdivision Approval Variance X Site & Bldg, Plan Approval X Special Use Permit —. Other: Description of Reques-t: Special Use Amendment and Site and Building Plan Approval for the Ponds Fee $ 25.00 Receipt No. 487331 49 Applicant's Si nature July 17, 1978 Date PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Dates of P.C. Consideration: Approved __Lz,— Denied this b,t, day of e 197x, subject to the follow- ing condll, ,� Ions' .'Cha-irman rTTv rnilklrTi ArTTNM CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430 PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING APPLICATION FOR SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL Prior to submission of an application for plan review and approval , prospective applicants should arrange an informational meeting with the Planning staff to discuss preliminary plans and to become familiarized with applicable ordinance and policy provisions. Three (3) copies of the following documents and information shall be submitted, at least 14 days prior to the date of the regular Commission meeting, concurrent with filing the—appl'ication T—requ-ir;d documents mast be consistent with ordinance and policy provisions before an application may be accepted) : 1. A certified site survey drawing by a registered engineer or land surveyor showing pertinent existing condition, accurately dimensioned. 2.* An accurately scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating: a) parking layouts including access provisions; b) designations and locations of accessory buildings; c) fences, walls or other screening, including heights and type of material ; d) outside lighting provisions, type and location; e) curbing, 3.* A landscape plan showing areas to be sodded or seeded; location, size and species of trees and shrubbery, 4.* Building floor plans, elevations, sections and specifications, including materials proposed. 5.* Existing and proposed land elevations, drainage provisions, and utility provisions. 6. Additional drawings, plans or information deemed necessary by the Secretary. *Must be prepared by a registered architect or person registered with the State Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers and Land Surveyors, and said drawings/plans shall be so certified. NOTE: Upon approval of plans by the Council and prior to issuance of permits, a Performance Agreement as to approved site 'improvements and a supporting financial guarantee, in an amount to be determined by the City, are required. Acceptable financial instruments include cash escrow; certificate of deposit; and performance bond. Copies of the Zoning Ordinance may be obtained from the Administrative Office. Questions should be directed to the Department of Planning and Inspection. P/I Form No. 19 Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 78048 Applicant: Meadow Corporation Location: "The Ponds" Planned Residential Development (approximately 71st and Unity Avenues North) . Request: Special Use, Site and Building Plan Approval The applicant is seeking a special use permit as a planned residential development and site and building plan approval for the fourth development phase of "The Ponds. " The development comprehends 66 condominium single family attached dwelling units in the area of 71st and Unity Avenues North. The applicant proposes platting of the area into two plats which are the subject of two other applications on the Commission's agenda. The plans seem to be consistent with the master plan for the development area. A public hearing has been scheduled, .and notices have been sent. Approval of the application should be subject to at least the following conditions: 1 . Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A Performance Agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted to assure completion of approved site improvements. 4. Development of this portion of the planned residential development shall also be subject to applicable conditions of the original development approval by the City Council on October 18, 1976 under Application No. 76041 . 5. Viable turf, such as sod or seed shall be provided for all open space areas in accordance with approval by the City. 8-10-78 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING APPLICATION Application No. 78055 Please Print Clearly or Type Street Location of Property 73rd and Unity Avenues North Legal Description of Property Part of Outiots, The Ponds See file. Owner Meadow Corporation/Duane Dietrich Address 7400 Candlewood Drive Phone No 425-8222 Applicant Same Address Phone No. Type of Request: Rezoning x Subdivision Approval Variance Site & Bldg, Plan Approval Special Use Permit Other: Description of Request: Approval of Preliminary Plat of The Ponds Plat 7. Fee $172.00 Receipt No. 48836 `77pl 7cant-s Signature August 4, 1978 Date PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Dates of P.C. Consideration: Approved Denied this -2hk6- day of 19 subject to the follow- ing coed' airman - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - I r1TV roiihirTl ArTTOKI CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430 PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING APPLICATION FOR SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL Prior to submission of an application for plan review and approval , prospective applicants should arrange an informational meeting with the Planning staff to discuss preliminary plans and to become familiarized with applicable ordinance and policy provisions. Three (3) copies of the following documents and information shall be submitted, at least 14 days prior to the date of the regular Commission meeting, concurrent with filing—the —appl 1 cation �—required documents must be consistent with ordinance and policy provisions before an application may be accepted) : 1. A certified site survey drawing by a registered engineer or land surveyor showing pertinent existing condition, accurately dimensioned. 2.* An accurately scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating: a) parking layouts including access provisions; b) designations and locations of accessory buildings; c) fences , walls or other screening, including heights and type of material ; d) outside lighting provisions, type and location; e) curbing, 3.* A landscape plan showing areas to be sodded or seeded; location, size and species of trees and shrubbery, 4.* Building floor, plans, elevations , sections and specifications, including materials proposed. 5.* Existing and proposed land elevations, drainage provisions, and utility provisions. 6. Additional drawings, plans or information deemed necessary by the Secretary. *Must be prepared by a registered architect or person registered with the State Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers and Land Surveyors, and said drawings/plans shall be so certified. NOTE: Upon approval of plans by the Council and prior to issuance of permits, a Performance Agreement as to approved site improvements and a supporting financial guarantee, in an amount to be determined by the City, are required. Acceptable financial instruments include cash escrow; certificate of deposit; and performance bond. Copies of the Zoning Ordinance may be obtained from the Administrative Office. Questions should be directed to the Department of Planning and Inspection. P/I Form No. 19 Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 78055 Applicant: Meadow Corporation Location: "The Ponds" Planned Residential Development (approximately 73rd and Unity Avenues North Request: Preliminary Plat Approval On June 5, 1978, the City Council approved Planning Commission Application No. 78029 consisting of site and building plans for the third development phase of "The Ponds" Planned Residential Development. One of the conditions of that approval was that the sites of the proposed development are subject to replatting prior to occupancy of any of the units therein. This development consists roughly known as Phases 7 and 8 on the master plan and consists of 112 rental units. The applicant is proposing replatting of this area so that it would be possible to sell these units individually at some point in time with these units being later incorporated into "The Ponds" Homeowners Association. The Engineering Department has reviewed the plat and will be prepared to comment at Thursday evening's meeting. A public hearing has been scheduled and notices have been sent. Approval would be subject to at least the following conditions: 1 . Final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. Final plat is subject to the requirements of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 8-24-78 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING APPLICATION Application No. 78049 Please Print Clearly or Type Street Location of Property 70th and Unity Avenues North Legal Description of Property Outlots C and I , The Ponds Owner - Meadow Corporation (Duane H. Dietrich, President) Address 7400 Candlewood Drive, Brooklyn Park Phone No. 425-8222 Applicant Address Phone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Subdivision Approval Variance Site & Bldg. Plan Approval Special Use Permit Other: Description of Request: Preliminary Plat to be known as—"The Ponds Plat 3. " Fee $ 55-00 Receipt No. 48731 Applicant SignaffiuFe__"' July 17, 1978 Date PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Dates of P.C. Consideration: Approved R Denied this day of 19 subject to the follow- ing cond•, orls, ' Chairman - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . rTTv rr)iihfrTl ArTTOKI CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430 PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING APPLICATION FOR SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL Prior to submission of an application for plan review and approval , prospective applicants should arrange an informational meeting with the Planning staff to discuss preliminary plans and to become familiarized with applicable ordinance and policy provisions. Three (3) copies of the following documents and information shall be submitted, at least 14 days prior to the date of the regular Commission meeting, concurrent with filing—th—eapplication T—required documents must be consistent with ordinance and policy provisions before an application may be accepted) : 1. A certified site survey drawing by a registered engineer or land surveyor showing pertinent existing condition, accurately dimensioned. 2.* An accurately scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating: a) parking layouts including access provisions; b) designations and locations of accessory buildings; c) fences, walls or other screening, including heights and type of material ; d) outside lighting provisions, type and location; e) curbing. 3.* A landscape plan showing areas to be sodded or seeded; location, size and species of trees and shrubbery. 4.* Building floor plans, elevations, sections and specifications, including materials proposed. 5.* Existing and proposed land elevations, drainage provisions, and utility provisions. 6. Additional drawings, plans or information deemed necessary by the Secretary. *Must be prepared by a registered architect or person registered with the State Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers and Land Surveyors, and said drawings/plans shall be so certified. NOTE: Upon approval of plans by the Council and prior to issuance of permits, a Performance Agreement as to approved site improvements and a supporting financial guarantee, in an amount to be determined by the City, are required. Acceptable financial instruments include cash escrow; certificate of deposit; and performance bond. Copies of the Zoning Ordinance may be obtained from the Administrative Office. Questions should be directed to the Department of Planning and Inspection. P/1 Form No. 19 Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 78049 Applicant: Meadow Corporation Location: Outlots C and I, The Ponds (approximate location,71st and Unity Avenues) Request: Preliminary Plat The applicants requesting preliminary plat approval for The Ponds Plat 3 consisting of Outlots C and I of The Ponds Addition located at approximately 71st and Unity Avenues North. The platting is in conjunction with the site and building plan review in Application No. 78048. The Engineering Department has reviewed the plat and will be prepared to comment. A public hearing has been scheduled and notices have been sent. Approval would be subject to at least the following conditions: 1 . Final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. Final plat is subject to the requirements of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 8-10-78 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING APPLICATION Application No. 78029 Please Print Clearly or Type Street Location of Property Legal Description of Property O.L.F and G, The Ponds Owner - Fred Seed/Meadow Corporation Address 7400 Candlewood Drive - Brooklyn Park 55445 Phone No. 425-8222 Applicant &adow Corporation/Ponds Partnership Address Same Phone No, Same Type of Request: Rezoning Subdivision Approval Variance X_ Site & Bldg. Plan Approval X Special Use Permit Other: Description of Request: 3rd Phase of Ponds P.R.D. (NOTE: Not "Phase 3") Fee $ 50.00 A a 41 r-, Receipt No. 48247 App icanil`s T1-§n­atfkV_,W* q_- 7& Date PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Dates of P.C. Consideration: Approved Denied this_'S_ day of 19 _Zf'subject to the follow- , ��` wng cond`, .i'ons,,., Chairman - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - . rTTv rmmirTt ArTTnh1 x � CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430 PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING APPLICATION FOR SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL Prior to submission of an application for plan review and approval , prospective applicants should arrange an informational meeting with the Planning staff to discuss preliminary plans and to become familiarized with applicable ordinance and policy provisions. Three (3) copies of the following documents and information shall be submitted, at least 14 days prior to the date of the regular Commission meeting, concurrent with filing the application required documents mast be consistent with ordinance and policy provisions before an application may be accepted) : 1. A certified site survey drawing by a registered engineer or land surveyor showing pertinent existing condition, accurately dimensioned. 2,* An accurately scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating: a) parking layouts including access provisions; b) designations and locations of accessory buildings; c) fences, walls or other screening, including heights and type of material ; d) outside lighting provisions, type and location; e) curbing. 3.* A landscape plan showing areas to be sodded or seeded; location, size and species of trees and shrubbery. 4.* Building floor plans, elevations, sections and specifications, including materials proposed. 5.* Existing and proposed land elevations, drainage provisions, and utility provisions. 6. Additional drawings, plans or information deemed necessary by the Secretary. *Must be prepared by a registered architect or person registered with the State Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers and Land Surveyors, and said drawings/plans shall be so certified. NOTE: Upon approval of plans by the Council and prior to issuance of permits, a Performance Agreement as to approved site improvements and a supporting financial guarantee, in an amount to be determined by the City, are required. Acceptable financial instruments include cash escrow; certificate of deposit; and performance bond. Copies of the Zoning Ordinance may be obtained from the Administrative Office. Questions should be directed to the Department of Planning and Inspection. P/I Form No, 19 Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 78029 Applicant: Meadow Corporation Location: The Ponds Planned Unit Development Request: Site and Building Plan Approval The applicant is seeking site and building plan approval for the third addition of The Ponds Planned Residential Development; this area covers the portions of the approved Master Plan known as Phases 7 and 8 at the north end of the project. The Commission reviewed the conceptual layout at the last meeting and stated concerns relative to the parking provisions, especially for the units which will abut Unity Avenue North, and the provisions for storage since these are intended to be family units. The applicant has submitted a revised design for the off-street parking for the units along Unity which results in a much improved layout whereby the ordinance required greenstrip can be fully provided with exception of normal dimensioned driveways. The earlier plan had virtually eliminated the greenstrip in order to accommodate the open parking spaces. This revised parking has resulted in a shifting of the buildings so that the parking areas are within ordinance setback requirements. On the Phase 7 area which is on the west side of Unity Avenue North, the original Master Plan concept of a large ponding area will be eliminated. This area will serve as a rear open space behind the units and allows the units to be moved to the rear without major site engineering costs since the cost savings of not installing the large ponding area more than compensate the additional construction costs. We will be prepared to discuss the plans in detail at the meeting. In addition to the site and building plans, the applicant is also submitting an 9 p � pP 9 amended Master Plan which comprehends some boundary changes between Phases 8 and 6. The applicant also should be submitting for a conceptual review, an amended preliminary plat for this area. We will be prepared to discuss these in detail at the meeting. Approval is recommended subject to at least the following conditions: 1 . Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to issuance of permits. 3. A Performance Agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted to assure completion of approved site improvements. 4. The sites of the proposed development shall be subject to replatting prior to occupancy of any units therein. Develop- ment of this portion of the Planned Residential Development shall also be subject to applicable conditions of the original development approval under Application No. 76041 by the City Council on October 18, 1976. 5-25-78 Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 78029 Applicant: Meadow Corporation Location: North portion of "The Ponds" Plannned Residential Development near 73rd and Unity Avenues North Request: Site and Building Plan Review and Approval The applicant has submitted site and building plans for 112 townhouses which represent the third phase of "The Ponds" planned residential development for which a special use permit was approved over a year ago. For clarification, this phase is not "Phase 3" as per the approved master plan. It, in fact, comprehends what was approved as "Phases 7 and 8" at the north end of the project. The item is presented at this time for review and comment, and recommendation would be to table the matter until the next meeting. The applicant will be submitting a proposed revision to the master plan as well as a proposed preliminary plat for this particular phase. The revision of the master plan comprehends adjustment of the phase lines since the proposed 112 units and related open space have been designed within the approved Phases 7 and 8, but do not require all of the land that is within those phases. We will be prepared to discuss the application in detail at the meeting. 5-11-78 .v / ({ r 1 � `� . � � .,- ,.` a �t •r _. �— r/ .,�� c. .S J I iz ca i 1 �• ` ----- V7 N... ��+-��"',_. �i /c 4 fit;l:.i.�j 1 � "4 I •'t;, r ! ^I y d � i — N I r."_ v ' TIT 4 ic n. m Of 4;f.ON 4zEIG fit i ok do m no r .4 FI. Al" 4p 4p 4f N 41P --I 4Pl DW MW QA. AL . ... .... ... ... 41 7 4f 4f to-INO;g 40 x1l" lie WIMIII.M. )qjyd KAl>OOdti ;iO AL03 P"III CN A_4 00 IF. Med ow Cor oration p 7400 CANDLEWOOD DRIVE BROOKLYN PARK,MINNESOTA 55445 TELEPHONE 425-8222 April 11 , 1977 Mr. Blaire Tremere City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430 Dear Bla.ire: As you know, our firm is actively pursuing a possible Section g project for the north end of our Fox Run Subdivision. I would appreciate any help you could give us regarding the request con- tained in the attached letter from Mr. David Frederiksen. Sincerely, MEADOW CORPORATION ' t I Duane H. Dietrich President DHD:jea Enc. I e MORTGAGE BANKERS CERTIFIED PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INSURANCE Since 18P5 4940 VIKING DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS,MINN.55435 April b, 1977 TELEPHONE(612)835-7511 Mr. Duane Dietrich Meadow Corporation 7400 Candlewood Drive Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55429 Dear Duane: We have been talking for some time about the potential of your developing approximately 111 family-type townhouse units in Brooklyn Center in your Fox Run subdivision. The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency is most anxious to provide the financing and the rental subsidy under the HUD section 8 program for projects of this type. There is a real demand for this type of rental unit in the suburban areas of our Twin Cities, and the Housing Finance Agency does have the necessary financing for this type of project. It would be most helpful in the analysis of this project to receive in writing a indication of the City of Brooklyn Center's interest in a project of this type, and that is what 1 am requesting by this letter. It is my understanding that Brooklyn Center is encouraging a project of this type and it would be most helpful if we could get an indication of that in writing. That would help us in our processing and the Housing Finance Agency in their analysis of the project. Yours truly, H. & VAL J. ROTHSCHILD, INC. r r • r David C. Fre eriksen Senior Vice President DCF:nj April 28, 1977 Mr. Duane H. Dietrich, President Meadow Corporation 7400 Candlewood Drive Brooklyn Park, MN 55445 Dear Mr. Dietrich: This is in response to your April 11 , 1977 letter and discussions we have had regarding the feasibility of Section 8 construction of family-type units in the north phases of the Fox Run development. We have reviewed this matter with the City Manager and hereby confirm the City's support of the concept of Section 8 housing construction and rental programs in meeting the low to moderate income family housing needs in the community. While the City is a willing participant in the Section 8 concept, we are most concerned that the concept not be exploited through the mass produc- tion of units resulting in ghetto-like conditions. We strongly endorse the "scattered site" or dispersed development concept of the Section 8 program, and thus we would view the magnitude of a proposed Section 8 development as a major consideration. The approved master plan for your planned residential development in the northwest corner of the City would indicate a potential for dwelling units constructed under the Section 8 program. The matter of diversification or "scattered site", it would appear, could be accomplished through in- tegration of market rate units with the Section 8 units Vhroughout one or more phases. We would strongly suggest that a conceptual plan be prepared which would show such development in the later phases of the project, and we are prepared to review such a plan within the guidelines of both the Section 8 program and local codes and ordinances. Thank you for your inquiry. Further questions regarding this matter should be directed to this office. Sincerely, Blair Tremere Director of Planning and Inspection BT:ml g cc: Don Poss cc: File _ CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING APPLICATION Application No. 78032 Please Print Clearly Street Location of Property 7200 Block, west side, Brooklyn Boulevard Legal Description of Property See Survey Owner (l )M, and A. Forrester /2\ R. L. Johnson, Anndndal8,MN /3\ Dolores ReigSl , Dresser, WI Address 7232 BOOD2 Avenue North /R'L'JOhnSnD\ 55428 Phone Nu, 533-2428 Applicant Same Address Phone N0. � Type of Request: X SUbdiViSi0n Approval � Variance Site Q Bldg. Plan Approval � Special Use Permit Other: � Description Of Request: R8Z0De land from R-3 to C-y to permit commercial dSVSl0p08Dt � including Oti ng establishment and an office building. � Fee $ � 48369 ^--- Receipt Nn, pp uufe . « PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Dates of P.C. Consideration: Approved Denied this day of ,�e- 19 ? � subject to the follow- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . rTTv rn//mrn urTrom N x � CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430 PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING APPLICATION FOR SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL Prior to submission of an application for plan review and approval , prospective applicants should arrange an informational meeting with the Planning staff to discuss preliminary plans and to become familiarized with applicable ordinance and policy provisions. Three (3) copies of the following documents and information shall be submitted, at least 14 days prior to the date of the regular Commission meeting, concurrent with filing the application required documents wrist be consistent with ordinance and policy provisions before an application may be accepted) : 1. A certified site survey drawing by a registered engineer or land surveyor showing pertinent existing condition, accurately dimensioned. 2.* An accurately scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating: a) parking layouts including access provisions; b) designations and locations of accessory buildings; c) fences, walls or other screening, including heights and type of material ; d) outside lighting provisions, type and location; e) curbing. 3.* A landscape plan showing areas to be sodded or seeded; location, size and species of trees and shrubbery" 4.* Building floor plans, elevations, sections and specifications, including materials proposed. 5.* Existing and proposed land elevations, drainage provisions, and utility provisions . 6. Additional drawings, plans or information deemed necessary by the Secretary. *Must be prepared by a registered architect or person registered with the State Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers and Land Surveyors, and said drawings/plans shall be so certified. NOTE: Upon approval of plans by the Council and prior to issuance of permits, a Performance Agreement as to approved site improvements and a supporting financial guarantee, in an amount to be determined by the City, are required. Acceptable financial instruments include cash escrow; certificate of deposit; and performance bond. Copies of the Zoning Ordinance may be obtained from the Administrative Office. Questions should be directed to the Department of Planning and Inspection. P/I Form No. 19 f BOB JOHNSON PRESIDENT P53CL7232 BOONE AVE.NO. •BROOKLYN PARK,MN 55428•(612)533-2428 May 23 , 1978 B reme e Mr. lair T r , Director Planning and Inspection City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, Mn. 55430 Dear Mr. Tremere: I respectfully request at this time Brooklyn Center Plan- ning Commission' s consideration for rezoning of my land situated north of Shingle Creek and westerly of Brooklyn Boulevard. I am aware of its present zoning and feel it is uneconomically sound for us to proceed with a townhouse development hereon because of the current soil conditions and certain businesses located north of us, i.e. , two car dealerships, a pizza parlor and a real estate office. Approximately two-thirds of the 2. 8 acres in question, we ask your consideration for rezoning to C-1 for an office building. The other third we ask be considered for a restaurant site. We feel with the buffer zones provided, a restaurant situated between the proposed office building and a car dealership would not create or establish any inconveniences for surrounding land owners, but provide a fine family, full-service restaurant at the north end of Brooklyn Center, which currently is not available. I ask at this time your consideration be given to the development of this property as such, based on the following: Of the total 4 .7 acres, there would only be 2 . 8 acres of buildable land. That is, approximately 40% of this property would. remain in its natural state to serve as a buffer zone between our land and the adjacent land owners. we feel that with 40% of the land serving as a buffer zone, the highest amount of privacy and consideration for all parties concerned will be achieved. Mr . Blair Tremere -2- 4/23/78 This 400 of unused land represents a minimum of a 100- foot buffer zone on the abutting properties within Brooklyn Center. we feel with the natural environment of the creek serving as a barrier, the heavy density of trees, and unused land on the southerly portion of the creek, we are more than adequately providing privacy for the adjacent property owners. Big B's Inc. , originally founded in Brooklyn Park thirteen years ago, has a strong interest in placing their corporate offices within the proposed office complex and continuing to grow in this market area. I would like to point out that this land has been in our family for more than four generations and was orig- inally homesteaded by them. Commercial development on this site should be of the type and design that will not disrupt the existing neighborhood, and we feel that our office complex design with its low profile, and the restaurant to be considered, both exemplify the greatest consideration for all concerned. To assist the Council in considering this appeal, attached is a brief site description of the property involved. With respect to your Comprehensive Plan, we recognize the need of a totally planned community but we also feel that not every area is black and white and that variables do exist. We do not feel it will set a precedence that will cause embarrassment to the City because of the existing conditions. I am not fa- miliar with any other area that would lend itself to some of the problems that we are faced with but with your consideration we would be able to develop and establish a sound project that will provide a great deal of employment for those living in the area and create a very substantial tax contribution to this community. Hope this will assist the Council in arriving at a favorable decision regarding this request. Respectfully yours, BIG B'S INCORPORXTED Robert L. Johnson President Sw/enc. The subject property encompasses 4. 7 acres situated on the west side of State 'gunk Highway 152 straddling the corporate boundaries of Brooklyn Center and Brooklyn Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The greater part of the site is located in Brooklyn Center and thus greater emphasis will be placed upon this latter community' s phy- sical development controls. The property is presently zoned R-3, with permitted residential development at townhouse densities. The site is bounded by developed urban uses on 3 sides: the Brooklyn American AMC dealership and Golden Fox Supper Club to the north; the Dietrich Construction Creek Villa Townhouse Development to the south, and Trunk Highway 152 to the east with the Park Center Senior High School located across the highway. The site has excellent visibility from Trunk Highway 152 for traffic traveling in both directions, and there is visibility along Regent Avenue traveling east. Access to the property is excellent via Trunk Highway 152 from the surrounding residential areas both to the north and to the south. Shingle Creek passes through the southern portion of the property site and drains northeast to Palmer Lake. The land to the north of the creek is nearly level throughout, and soil tests indicate that it can readily accommodate building development. The land to the south of the creek is highly sloped, and the soil is composed of peat and muck which presents severe limitations to building. The build- able land is considered to be that land north of the creek encom- passing 2 .8 acres. Density transfer to the buildable portion of the site can be accomplished under careful site design to achieve full development of the site' s potential. Both the presence of Shingle Creek within the site and the immediate area surrounding the site provide it with an attractive physical environment regarded as a strong amenity for both site development and neighborhood value. To the east, stands Park Center Senior High School which has a large open area that extends south to an open corridor along Shingle Creek. To the south is Creek Villa townhouse development which is effectively using greenway space to benefit from the existence of the creek. Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 78032 Applicant: R. L. Johnson Location: 7200 Block on Brooklyn Boulevard (west side) Request: Rezoning The applicant is requesting a rezoning from R-3 (Townhouse-Garden Apartments) to C-2 (General Commercial ) of a tract of land consisting of two parcels which contain approximately five acres bounded by Brooklyn Boulevard on the east, the municipal Brooklyn Center-Brooklyn Park boundary on the north, the east property line of "The Ponds" planned residential development on the west, and the north boundary of the Creek Villa Townhouse neighborhood on the south (which is on the south side of Shingle Creek which runs through the subject property) . Your attention is directed to the Planning Commission information sheet of June 15, 1978 (attached) relating to the background information pertinent to this application. The application was reviewed by the Commission on June 15, 1978 and referred to the Northwest Neighborhood Advisory Group. The advisory group met on June 29, 1978 to consider the rezoning request and a copy of their report is attached. Basically the group concurred with the rezoning request based on the applicant's proposal for a split type zoning which would allow for a C-1 (Service/ Office) use on the southerly portion of the property, and a C-2 type use for the northerly portion of the property to allow for development of a restaurant. Based on further analysis of the application, it is felt that the following are pertinent items which the Planning Commission should give consideration to prior to making its recommendation: 1 . C-2 (General Commercial/Retail ) Zoning is clearly not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for areas along Brooklyn Boulevard. The Comprehensive Plan provides that appropriate future develop- ment uses and rezonings along Brooklyn Boulevard would include Multiple-Family Zoning and Service/Office Commercial Zoning. There is thus, basic conflict with the City rezoning policy in Section 35-208 (attached) which states zoning classifications must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Should the Commission determine that there is merit to the rezoning to a C-2 status, it would be necessary to amend the Comprehensive Plan. I 2. While development concepts such as those submitted by the applicant are useful in determining whether a piece of land can, in fact, be developed, the Commission is cautioned that zoning decisions based upon specific development proposals are not sound legally. There is no "contractual " basis for the City holding the developer to a specific use once the land is zoned to a particular classification. In other words, should all or a portion of this property be zoned C-2, it would be subject to any permitted or special use in the C-2 Zoning District. 7-27-78 r Application No. 78032 continued: 3. The application should be fully evaluated against those criteria in Section 35-208 which the Commission feels are appropriate. A second portion of the rezoning policy is that rezoning proposals shall not constitute "spot zoning" defined as a zoning decision which discriminates in favor of a particular landowner and does not relate to the Comprehensive Plan or to accepted planning principles. It would be appropriate for the Commission to use the checklist guidelines listed in the ordinance to evaluate this proposal . Notices of the meeting were sent to the neighboring property owners, and to date, we have received one call from Marcile Erickson, 7208 Perry Court East, who stated she would be unable to attend the Planning Commission meeting, but wished to ex- press that she does not favor the rezoning request. Recommendation It is felt that the applicant's proposal does not meet the established criteria contained in Section 35-208 of the City Ordinances for evaluating rezoning requests and, therefore, denial of the application is recommended to the Planning Commission. 7-27-78 Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 78032 Applicant: R. L. Johnson Location: 7200 Block on Brooklyn Boulevard (west side) Request: Rezoning The applicant is requesting rezoning from R-3 (Townhouse-Garden Apartments) to C-2 (General Commercial ) of a tract of land consisting of two parcels which contain approximately 5 acres bounded by Brooklyn Boulevard on the east, municipal Brooklyn Park-Brooklyn Center boundary on the north, the east property line of "The Ponds" Planned Residential Development on the west, and the north boundary of the Creek Villa Townhouse neighborhood on the south (which is on the south side of the Shingle Creek which runs through the subject property) . Background I . The applicant owns the bulk of the subject property which contains just under 5 acres; and he apparently has an option with the owner of a small parcel abutting Brooklyn Boulevard which contains a rented single family home. The owner of the single family home has submitted a letter stating no objection to the rezoning request. The applicant also owns property on the other side of the Brooklyn Center-Brooklyn Park municipal boundary. 2. The applicant, has for some time, proposed conceptual plans for a commercial development which, in all cases, has included a restaurant of one sort or another. The applicant has been informed on numerous occasions over the past several years that, restaurants require C-2 Zoning which, as elaborated below, is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. No plans have been submitted comprehending an R-3 type development. 3. The property contains enough area to support the townhouse density of approximately 36 to 40 units. The applicant states that only about 2.8 acres of the property is "buildable", at least for the proposed purposes; Shingle Creek runs through the property and is in the midst of a 100 foot easement. This determination of buildable land as a percentage of the total parcel , however, does not preclude the development of townhouses since the ordinance criteria are concerned with overall density more so than with the aggregate area of actual construction sites. 4. The application has been accepted as a request to rezone the property to C-2 which comprehends both retail and office uses because of the applicant's insistence that a portion of the site be zoned to accommodate a retail restaurant business. He has submitted conceptual layouts indicating a "split" zoning wherein the southerly part of the property would be zoned C-1 and would be intended for development with office-type uses, and the northerly portion would be zoned C-2 to accommodate a restaurant use. The applicant's contention is that the C-1 would provide "buffering" between the residential development to the south on the other side of the Creek and the proposed retail or restaurant use. -1- 6-15-78 i Application No. 78032 continued: It was deemed appropriate to accept the application for a C-2 rezoning of the entire property at this time so the matter could be fully evaluated against the Comprehensive Plan and the Ordinance Rezoning Evaluation Criteria at both the public hearing and sub- sequent meetings. There are not any clear defined boundaries running through this property upon which a zoning line could be established, and consequently, should the Commission and Council ultimately determine such a split zoning concept has merit, establishment of that line would be relatively arbitrary based upon a specific development proposal . The Commission and Council have the prerogative, upon full evaluation, to modify the proposal if the split zoning concept has merit so that the result would be a C-1 and C-2 zoning of the same property. 5. The applicant has submitted a letter, a copy of which is attached setting forth his reasons for seeking the rezoning. 6. Also attached is a photocopy of a letter sent to the applicant earlier this year which included a copy of the Rezoning Evaluation Criteria listed in Section 35-208 of the City Ordinances; a copy of that section is also attached. 7. Unlike the parcel across Brooklyn Boulevard to the east which was rezoned from R-1 to C-1 approximately one year ago, this parcel has utilities available to it; and it is zoned Multiple-Residential which is a higher use and density since the parcel is larger and capable of supporting such a development. A public hearing has been scheduled, and neighboring property owners within 350 feet have been notified: this includes individual owners of the condominium townhouses in the Creek Villas neighborhood. Preliminary Analysis 1 . C-2 (General Commerce/Retail ) Zoning is clearly not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for areas along Brooklyn Boulevard. The Comprehensive Plan provides that appropriate future develop- ment uses and rezonings along Brooklyn Boulevard would include Multiple-Family Zoning and Service/Office Commercial Zoning. There is thus, a basic conflict with the City rezoning policy in Section 35-208 which states zoning classifications must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Should the Commission determine that there is merit to the rezoning to a C-2 status, it would be necessary to amend the Comprehensive Plan. -2- 6-15-78 Application No. 78032 continued: 2. While development concepts such as those submitted by the applicant are useful in determining whether a piece of land can, in fact, be developed, the Commission is cautioned that zoning decisions based upon specific development proposals are not sound legally. There is no "contractual" basis for the City holding the developer to a specific use once the land is zoned to a particular classification. In other words, should all or a portion of this property be zoned C-2, it would be subject to any permitted or special uses in the C-2 Zoning District. 3. The application should be fully evaluated against those criteria in Section 35-208 which the Commission feels are appropriate. A second portion of the rezoning policy is that rezoning proposals shall not constitute "spot zoning" defined as a zoning decision which discriminates in favor of a particular landowner and does not relate to the Comprehensive Plan or to accepted planning principles. It would be appropriate for the Commission to use the "checklist" guidelines listed in the ordinance to evaluate this proposal once the hearing has been held and the proposal has been made by the applicant. 4. As we have indicated to the applicant on occasion over the past several years, we do not preclude the possibility of a rezoning to C-1 following a complete analysis of the nature of the property, its physcial characteristics, location and desirability for use as a multiple-residential site, the Commission will recognize that these are the type of criteria which will be used to judge the proper zoning of a property in a Comprehensive Planning process. It seems apparent that the Comprehensive Plan took this into account by suggesting that appropriate uses along Brooklyn Boulevard on appropriate sites could be either Multiple-Residential or Service- Office Commercial ) . The applicant has submitted a topographical survey, but has yet to submit soils information which he claims has bearing on the suitability of this site for certain types of development. We thus, would require more time to review and analyze the technical data to specifically determine how much of the site is "buildable'.' 5. The applicant has had an architect prepare an Environmental Assessment Worksheet Questionaire, and we have indicated to the applicant that this should be reviewed for accuracy since apparently further inform- ation regarding soils conditions is now available. There is an obvious environmental sensitivity with the Shingle Creek Corridor through this property and, at the discretion of the City as the application is processed, a more thorough Environmental Assessment may be required. Recommendation It is established Commission policy to refer all rezoning and Comprehensive Plan review matters to the appropriate Neighborhood Advisory Group which is, in this instance, the Northwest Neighborhood Advisory Group. We have informed the members of the Neighborhood Group of this hearing, and it is possible some, or all , of the members may attend. -3- 6-15-78 twin city testinq am Qr'wwwwsm laboratory,wm. 662 CROMWELL AVENUE v woeoi„oF ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE 612/645-3601 REPORT OF: EXCAVATION OBSERVATION SAMBO S RESTAURANT PROJECT: BROOKLYN BOULEVARD DATE: September 13, 1978 BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA REPORTED TO: Doty & Sons FURNISHED BY: 620 39th Ave N COPIES To1) aus-Anderson of St Paul Inc Minneapolis, MN 55421 : City of Brooklyn Center Attn: Pat Doty 1) Sierra West Architects LABORATORY No. t n: Howard Marter 9-1297 1) Sambo s Restaurant INTRODUCTION This report concerns the recent excavation observations and compaction testing we performed on the soil conditions present at the Sambo's Restaurant located in Brooklyn Center, Minne- sota. Mr Mike Peterson with your firm, verbally authorized us to judge if the soils exposed within the excavation were suitable for fill placement. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of our hand-auger borings and compaction tests, it is our opinion the foundation network will provide adequate support for the structure. BUILDING PLAN We understand the proposed restaurant will be a single-story, slab-on-grade structure approx- imately 70' x 65' in plan dimension. Finished floor will be at elevation 71.25' . The struc- ture is designed to be supported by perimeter strip footings placed 4'-4” below finished floor and will exert a unit loading of 2400 psf. A number ,of isolated column pads will be placed immediately below the floor slab and will exert a unit loading of 3000 psf. BACKGROUND INFORMATION We were informed a preliminary soil exploration was conducted at the site by others. The generalized soil profile encountered at the boring locations consisted of limited amounts of surficial fill and organics overlying natural coarse alluvial soils. The coarse alluvial soils consisted of fine to medium-grained sands. OBSERVATION METHODS AND RESULTS On August 29, we performed a visual observation of the soils exposed throughout the building excavation. The exposed soils were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, and estimates were made of their strength properties. A series of shallow hand-auger borings were also put down to further ascertain the local subsurface soil conditions. During the excavation operations, the remains of an existing structure were encountered within the northern portion of the excavation. Foundation members for this existing structure had been left in place and were backfilled with uncontrolled fill materials, which were deemed unsuitable for foundation support. During our site visit, we observed that all of the exca- vation was extended down through all existing fill and debris with all existing foundation AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS. THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS, AND AUTHOR- IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. O twin city testinq sno tnowWwrinq tsoorstory,Inc. �?•�j� REPORT OF: EXCAVATION OBSERVATION DATE' September 13, 1978 LABORATORY No. 9-1297 PAGE 2 OBSERVATION METHODS AND RESULTS - Cont. members also removed from the excavation area. The depth of excavation within the northern 35' of the building area extended to 5'-6" below design bottom of footing elevation. Within the southern 30' of the building area, the natural undisturbed sands were exposed 1'-4" below the design bottom of footing elevation. According to offset building stakes provided in the field by the contractor, the excavation wa extended beyond all footing lines a sufficient amount so as to provide for a 1:1 lateral over- size for the fill placed beneath the footings. During placement of the granular fill sequence, we performed a series of compaction tests upon the request of the contractor. The in-place moisture-density tests were evaluated according to the moisture-density relation of soil as designated by ASTM:D698-70 (Standard Proctor). The test results indicate the fill materials were adequately compacted at the test locations and elevations. REMARKS We are attaching an information sheet concerning what we consider to be sound engineering practices for construction of a fill sequence. If we can be of further assistance to you, please contact us. TWIN CITY TESTING AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY INC DA Dale Britzius, ivil Engineer Terms Swor, C.P.S.S. Ma ger, Soils & Geology Dept DB/TES/jb AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE ►UELIC AND OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS ARE SUSMITTEO AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHOR. ISATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS, CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACT$ FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS 19 RESERVED PLNDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL. I twin city testinq aria engtmtrm,q taoorstory,mc. ST PAUL MNA 551114 �a L PHONE 612/645-3601 REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL SAMBO'S RESTAURANT PROJE11T: BROOKLYN BOULEVARD DATE: September 12, 1978 BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 1-Kraus-Anderson of St Paul REPORTED TO: Doty & Sons 1-City of Brooklyn Center COPIES TO: y 620 39th Ave N 1-Siera West Architects Minneapolis MN 55421 Attn: Howard Marter Attn: Pat Doty 1-Sambo's Restaurant LABORATORY No. 9-1297 TEST NUMBER: 1 2 3 4 DATE TAKEN: August 30,1978 August 30,1978 August 30,1978 August 30,1978 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION• Sand, fine to Silty sand, Silty sand, Silty sand, (Moisture-Density Sample medium grained, fine to medium fine to medium fine to medium Number) a little grained, a grained, a grained, trace gravel , brown little gravel , little gravel , of gravel , (SP-SM)-1 brown (SM)-2 brown (SM)-2 brown (SM)-2 LOCATION: 30'E of SW 30'N of SW 24'E of NW 52% of SE corner of corner of corner of corner of building building building building (footing line) (footing line) (footing line) (footing line) ELEVATION OF TEST: 67 ' 66.5' 67' 66.5' DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 6" 611 it 6" I FIELD DENSITY DETERMLNATION: Method Density- in Place By Sand-Cone Method, ASTM:DI 556-64 (44 Basis) Dry Density- (pcf) 122 121 126 122 Moisture Content (%) 5.0 6.7 7.5 7.0 Plus #t4 Material (q) 10 6 , 6 5 LABORATORY MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-70; Method "A", (44 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 117.4 121 .6 121 .6 121 .6 Optimum Moisture (%) 11 .9 11 .1 11 .1 11 .1 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction (qo) 104 100 104 100 Specified Compaction (q) 95 min/98 ave 95 min/98 ave 95 min/98 ave 95 min/98 ave REMARKS: The above test locations were selected by Doty & Sons. Compaction meets specifications in the above test areas. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS.THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES.ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHOR. IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS.CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL Twin City Testing and Engineering Laboratory, Inc. i By i twin city testinq iriC wrion Erwm IsDorstMi,ww-. 662 CROMWELL AVENUE "O D • ST PAUL, MN 55114 f"1 Y T PHONE 612/6453601 Y,�G REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL SAMBO'S RESTAURANT PROJECT: BROOKLYN BOULEVARD DATE: September 12, 1978 BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA REPORTED TO: Doty & Sons COPIES TO: (See page one) 620 39th Ave N Minneapolis, MN 55421 Attn: Pat Doty LABORATORY No. 9-1297 TEST NUMBER: 5 6 7 8 DATE TAKEN: August 30,1978 August 30,1978 August 30,1978 August 30,1978 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sand, fine to Silty sand, Silty sand, Silty sand, medium grained, fine to medium fine to medium fine to medium (Moisture-Density Sample grained, a grained, trace grained, trace grained, a Number) little gravel , of gravel , of gravel , little gravel , brown (SP-SM)-1 brown (SM)-2 brown (SM)-2 brown (SM)-2 LOCATION: 54'N & 18'W of 60% & 18'W of 18'S of NW NE corner of SE corner of SE corner of corner of building building building building (footing line) (footing line) .ELEVATION OF TEST: 64' 67 ' 63.5' 65.6' DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 3' 6" 2.5' 1 .51 FIELD DENSITY DETERMENATION: Method Density in Place By Sand-Cone Method, ASTM:DI 556-64 (44 Basis) Dry Density (pcf) 121 .5 124.0 119.0 119.0 Moisture Content W ' 5.3 7.2 8.4 7.5 Plus #4 Material (y) 7.0 5.0 4.0 9.0 LABORATORY MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-70, Method "A", (4 4 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 117.4 121 .6 121 .6 121 .6 Optimum Moisture W 11 .9 11 .1 11 .1 11 .1 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction W 103 102 98 98 Specified Compaction (%) 95 min/98 ave 95 min/98 ave 95 min/98 ave 95 min/98 ave REMARKS: The above test locations were selected by Doty & Sons. Compaction meets specifications in the above test areas. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES.ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS, AND AUTHOR. IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS.CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL Twin City Testinng0nond Engineerin Laboratory, Inc. By �✓`� , twin city testinq wva mroarmwinq I.b«,&crL,,mlr-. 662 CROMWELL AVENUE ST PAUL, MN 55114 u 'Q PHONE 612/6453601 REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL SAMBO'S RESTAURANT PROJECT: BROOKLYN BOULEVARD DATE: September 12, 1978 BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA REPORTED TO: Doty & Sons COPIES TO: See page one) 620 39th Ave N Minneapolis, MN 55421 Attn: Pat Dot LABORATORY No. 9-1297 TEST NUMBER: 9 DATE TAKEN: August 31 , 1978 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION: Sand, fine to medium grained, (Moisture-Density Sample brown (SP-SM)-1 Number) LOCATION: Center pad ELEVATION OF TEST: 69 ' DEPTH BELOR EXISTING GRADE: 2' FIELD DENSITY DETERMLNATION: Method Density in Place By Sand-Cone Method, ASTM:D1556-64 (-#4 Basis) Dry- Density (pcf) 121 Moisture Content (%) ' 5.3 Plus #4 Material W 7 LABORATORY MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL: Method ASTM:D698-70; Method "A", (44 Basis) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 117.4 Optimum Moisture W 11 .4 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS: Compaction W 103 Specified Compaction W 95 min/98 ave REMARKS: The above test location was selected by Twin City Testing and Engineer.i.ng Laboratory Inc. Compaction meets specifications in the above test area. AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES.ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHOR- RATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS.CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL Twin City Testing and Engineering Laboratory, Inc, By ■ Ism ■/■M■■M■■MMmMmH■sm■■■■■■■■■H■■H■■N■■■N■■■■M■N■H■■ ■ an ■mo■mom ommM■■■ ■■\■N■■■■■N■NHN/■HN■■M■■■■M ■ ■ ■■NM■/N■■■■■■■/■■/■ =ON N■■■/■■■■■■■■ ■■■NNN■� N/N■ Ns ommmmsoM■oHsm/son■H■/■■■■/■■/N■ ■■/■■ H/ �j■NH■■N■ m■ mm■m mN■N■o■ ■i�np■EE N N/M■h■ Man■H■nN■■■■OM N■N ■■sMSNN Mss■/■■■■■/■mNSSH■//N■■/■.NN■■■■■■■N//H■H■■■■■■■N■ ■N■M■smmmsmsH■mM■NN■■■/■NH■M■■■■■N■■■■■■■■■NN■�■ ■ mmssmmmsq■ MNm NNN■M■ . ■■■NSmmM■N■N■N■■NN■H■■NN■MH■qN■NN■gN■■mMmmg NMSmH■■ N//■M■■■■M/■■N■ mmmm■s■■N■N ■N/■HNHNN■■■■NNN ■NM■■ ■ 1MSM■■■■■■■■NM■■/NH■ ■NHMq■NHH■N■NN■■MN■/NM.■M N ■N ■ i■■■M/■■/Ni�NN■M■■■■o■■viii/■■■ ■ No on ■ ■N■■N■N H■■NMN HM■NN■///■.■■■■■N■M■/N■ H sNSm■/M■■N■■■■/q ■.N■■M■■■ M■ ■N■mmmM■■■■N/MNNNM■■N /■/■ � ■ M■N■■/■■NN■NN■ /■/. NONE mYmHN■■■mmNmNmm■N■■mN■■ NNNM■■NN NN • ■■NNNN■N■N■■■■N■■N■■/■ ■■■■NNNM // ///NMNNN/■■■N NN■■ ■Nq■/NMNN ■■�mMmM M■■smmNS/■■/■/NH N■N■/■N NNNM■■NNE ■m■N■q■mH■sN■■■■qon NH■N■N■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N■q N■mMmsmm■ m q■ ■m■N■■■H moo=■■■/■■■■ /N■■■/■M aHN Nm■MsM■H■m■H■N■�■H■NNHN■//■■■N■NH mN■■■■■■■mNmNHM/■■sHmmN m■/oiHwrNmmm/N■NNN■M■M■M■NM ■■Mm■mm■s■N■NMM■mmmlN■■■■ I-plummHN■■AammsMSsNNMm■ ■ ■■sM■■■■■■■■■■■N■■■■■N■N■■ANinns H■N■■-N\■N■/■■■■■NN smsmo■ s■■msssm/mm/■■/■■mm/iN■Ems NMm■N=%gym■■Hmsss■M ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■H■■■■■■■■NP.■■NH■■■■■ ■■N■■■O■■■■N■N/■■N■N■pN .�........sNSmmmHS H■H►..■...■■ssssssC ms/sNSm.�■m■ssMH■■H■MM■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■mH■■■/.IN■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■moos►`a■■o■mmm■■ N■■■■■■■■M■■NN■s/i■■■■■■■■ ■M■■■m■■MMm■■mom■\`\■■■■■N ■mm■■mom■ssm■■s■■H�/mom■■Mm■mmosmmoo■moomM MEMO ss\`m■msmM■M■ sM■ mom 0 mmwm No -SEEM ■■■■mmmsm■s/mmm■cis■smom mm ■ ■■mm■■■■mm■mmme%o■mms NEE ss■sms■smN■■H■N■■■■�■■■q■mm►`■/■■ ■■m ■■/■■mmm■m■■/i/sN■■■■NH■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N■■■ ■■■■/■■m■\`mM■■■■N■■N ' ■■smsmm=mNdNNmsmgm NONE N■m/mmm■■mmm■m■mmmm■m.mm■■m■■\ssmNmNmmm■ MEMSEEM Room ■■■■■msssmm■msssmo■■mm■smmss■■■sm■■mss■■msNmmmmssmsmmmsssssMMNH■■ ■msmmms■■■s■/■mM■■s■■mM■■■■■s■■■■■■■■■■N■■■M■■■■■m■■■■■■N■■O■M■ mo�omm WE =MEMO s■■/■sM■■■■/mss/Hm/sm■/■■/■■■■smm■�■■■■sms■smms oMMmmmmm mN■/ ■mmmmmmm gsmmmmo■mHmmMmmNo moo mmoms=■N/■m■m■mNmMan NNNNN ■■■ommo■m�so■■N■■■m ssmmmom■s■�N MSSSgs smmmNSm■s■■mmm■MSS H■M■H■m ■smm■■■m■s sM■■■■■■s■■■■M■m■■■S■■s■■MOM■■■N■■■s■■mmss■■■■H■N■W ■■mmss■■■■smM■msoN sHm■■■sM mms■m■sm■■MsH■■s■■■mm■■Emmons N■HWm Samos Emmons a mom ■■■■ms■■m■Hm■ss■m■■ms■msmmsH■/msm■■■■■smsms/■sm■■/■sm■m■mss■MMES ■■/■sm■s■■■ms■s■sms■o■s/s■s■■■mmsmms■■■■■mH■mss■mmoommsmmm■ Ms ■■■s■■sms mss/■sssss■■s■mss■ss■■■/■q■/mm■■ms/■■/■■■■■sMSsm■■ man am NEE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■mom■■■■■■■■■■■■ MMUM soon ■■s■s■■ss■ss/■sss■■■HNS■■ss■■■■mm■mSOON■m■■m■mm■o■■Hmm MEN■HM M■ ■m■■/■■■■■■■■■■■■o■■■■■m■■■■os■■■■/■■■■■■ Monson■■■M■M■■■■N ■ms■■mm■sm■■■mm■s■■■■■■■■■■m■■■s■■m■s IMES mommomms 00 so 01 mom■mqs■■■■■■■m■■m Elio M■■ momommoms ■ssssmmsssmmsmmmssss■smssmsmm■smmmsosmm■mssmsosEssi■smmlass .........C...........Mms■sm■■m/smmmss■■■sm■sms■s■smmmssmmom 0 m mason ■ /��■ ����■��H■���■■�N�����N��■ NOOSE =aN�■■q■pN■�� �■M■■■n /NN■■■NN■■■■■■■.■■/■EN H■■N■N//■■///■ \■=E■�ENIDES ■■m■i■s■■■■ N■■■/SEES■■/■■■■■■■■■■■NN■S■/SENSE■■■■/■■ ■N=NNNS N■HN■■ENN■ENNENN■EO NNE N■E■qEN■SS■► MEN==-- SEEMS -mom■NHNH■■■NgES■NENENNE■N■■gNNSSN \� .AMM RIN d7■RnBON■S■■ ■■■■■ONNN■NONN■■■NN■N■EN N■Nq■q No►\\i iii`iifil i/Ylifi■rii�NE■S■ ■■■■NNN■EN■EN■NNON NgENSEH/SNgNN■E■/NEN■\'E■■SNNNEN■■NN■EVEN■ ENNSNNN■■O■N■Nq■NN■■■NNON■■NN■NNN■■MSSN►�■Nq■■H_�■� ■ NN N■N■H N■■■N■NN NNN■N■N NN■NN■■NNNNN Lis■gN■Nw PENN�N■ENE■N�N�SN�■N■■NMNN monsoon� VIDEO HNENN■■■�qO ESN■%EN���■N■■NSS■w■■■NNN■■mom so a= ■■■■ N■NN■N■NSN■■NS■NgENNEN■qq■NNE N■N NN■■NEN■■■■N■ENN■■N■NN■ENORMOUS=NNNNS■■► N am N■N■N N■NSNNNSBS■NNNNSq H■NS■NNNNNN■/S■g■N Sg■NNN N/S■ IS SEEN NNENNNNNNNNq■E■N►\N\N■■NN■ ■N NNNNENE S Nq■NN■■■NNNN■■■■Nq■■■O■N NN■NNN■■N■■\`N■NN ■■ NN NN■N/HgNSN■/ NSNgN■NNNNNgNN,NNq NNoHH■ENNNN■E■■N SEEMS ■gNN■N■NN■gNN■■NN■\�SNNq N■q NNNN H■NN■N■■NNENHNNN■NN■NNNHNN■N■q■N■■N��NNN ■ N/NN■S■■■N■NHH■NN■N�.i•�NN'�NSN■NNq■NNNNNEIRI ■ ME an v NNNN■Nq■NNO■EgN NEENI�NNNES�NNNNENNENS■NNN\N■NN ■N■■NN■■/ONENNNNNNSI./NH■NNNa H■NNNNN■NNEONNN►�NNN■NNNNNN ■NNONNN■■■■■N■■NHS■■ I.NNNN■NNS■■N■►\■q■■N■■N■■■N■NN►H■ NNNNNN■■NNNH■■■■■N�/N■NON■N■■NNN■■EN■NNN■NNNNN\/N■ N ����������N■N�NSNI�inn■��■�S■���MEE 0 ��%������■■■■,\N NE■N■ ■■/NN■ENE/N■ENSSO//■NN/E/■NSNE�/N■ENON■N►W EN■■■■O■■ENN■NE/NNSNSq/ NNSES SEES■■NN/■SIGN■NS■NNN■NN■ES■ENS■HNNN\NNE■■/■N■NNENNI�SSNN■NE ■■NEN■■N■■ESN■■S//NN■N■NNN■■■N■■S■NNNNE■q■N\■NS■■H■■■NH■N E\N■N■N■ 1 NS N■NONNN■■EN■■/dO■■O■NNN■N■N NNONNN■S■/ONNAN/■■qNO■■■HN►�NNN■■ WIMUMMEM �E/■NEN/N■NENN/�/NEE■■NNS■NNN■■N■N■S■/■■NN■N\\N■NENN/ENNNNEN\'N■■NN■ ■EN■NNNN■■■■NN/IN■N■N■NEN■NE■N■■■■NN■■■N■■■N■■■►\■NN■■■NN■N■NEE■IN■NNE ■■N■■■■NN■■EN/ESE■N■■■■HEN■N■NS■■NNNS■■■NNENE■\\■ESN■ESNSNE■■■S��NEN■ ■■■■NNO■■■■■NII■NNNN■ENS■■■NN■■NNE■■ONN■E■N■■MWE NNENE■■■ENEH\■ENE ■■E■■■N■■■EI/SENENN■E■S■■■■NE■NNNN■�■■■SES�N■S■■■NH■NN■■■■■S■■Nq ■■N■NN■NN■■■►/NNNNN■■NN■NN■■■■NN■N■N■■■■NNN■N■■■NNNNN■N■N■■N■N ■■■N■N■NNE■INN/■NSN■■N■N/NS■N■■NNNN/q■ONHNHH■■NNENEN■■■ENNNN■■ ���N������ /%�NNHE��N■■NN::::�5••N•••E■NNNNN■■■■■N■NS■N■. ■■NN■NNN■N■7NN■NNN■■■■S■NNNE■�■N■NSS■ESONENSNE E■■■■■NNE■ an so monsmonsommoommsom ■■NNNNENN■■NN■■■■N■N■■NNONN■son/■/■■NN■N■NE■■NN■■N■N■NNN ■ ■■S■■■■NNENNN■■NNN■■O■■NN■■■NN■N■NNN■■NNNE■ENNENENSEN■E■■E■■■ ONE SEES■■■N■■NEN■■■■N■■NESNSEEN■■S ■■■N■■■■NN■NS■NNN■NN■NNNN■■SNNgN ■■■■NN■N■■■■SEEN/E■■■NESN■■N■■O/ "monsoon N■NEN■■ESNE■N■■N■■ES■■NME ■■■■N■■■■■■■■■■NNN■■N■■■NN■■■NNN■■■■NN■N■NN■N■NNN■■NN■NNN■■gNNmom ■N■■■NENE■ESN■■■N■S■■■NNN■NNE■■■NNN■NE■■■NN■■■■■■■■■■ ■N■NN■■ONE■ENE ■■N■■SEES■■NN■■NNNN■■ENN■NN■NNNNN■E■NON■■NE■■■■■■E■■NmNN MEN■■NN■■q■ woman 0 SOMME ENE a ■/N■■N■SNN■■■■■SN■■■■■■■■■N■■■■S■■■■■■■■■■ a■■■■■■■MEMO■N■■Nq■ q■ allo\��Nommomanumum a NNso SEES■■■N■CN■S■■N■NN■■ENE■■SNN■SEMEN■N■■■■NN■E■EN■N■■NENN■■N■ ■■BNNN :::::::°N�' :m :::°::::::om No Monsoon momm::: m::::•u�Can ::■: . t , PREREQUISITES FOR SOUND ENGINEERING PRACTICE In order to properly evaluate the foundation soils at a building site, it is imperative for our firm to know exactly where the building will be placed, its size, and the elevation of the foundation elements. Without this information, we cannot assure that the preparatory foundation earthwork is adequate. This project data is especially critical in situations where the excavation extends below the footing grade and compacted fill will be required to attain building elevations. In these situations, the excavation would require lateral oversizing to provide suitable lateral distribution of the footing loads. Offset batter boards or the building lines stakes provide the best on-site verification of the building location and size. It must be recognized that Twin City Testing and Engineering Labora- tory, Inc., does not practice in the field of surveying. We, therefore, must rely on staking by others. If Twin City Testing is required to perform the survey, we will retain a licensed surveyor and invoice client for that amount per our current fee schedule. Provision of the building founda- tion plans is also important so that we may properly perform our engineering judgements. If the construction is redesigned or otherwise moved subsequent to our work, we should be informed so our firm can assess if additional engineering observation is required, or suggest sound engineering alternatives. We cannot be responsible for any soil foundation system if the structure has been relocated with respect to the excavation subsequent to our observations. GENERAL OVERSIZE REQUIREMENTS Because of the lateral distribution of foundation pressures with depth, lateral oversizing is re- quired in an excavation where unsuitable soils extend below plan footing grade. The lateral oversize scheme provides compacted fill material beyond the exterior footing limits where fill is required below footing elevation. The degree of lateral oversizing is dependent upon the sur- rounding soil's ability to resist lateral movement. In most soils, we generally recommend the lateral oversize be at least 2 ft plus the depth of excavation below bottom of footing elevation. In extremely compressible swamp or organic soils, this oversize should be increased to 5 ft plus twice the depth of unsuitable soils below footing grade. Due to these variations in the required lateral oversize, each project must be evaluated individually. Diagrams illustrating typical over- size dimensions are included below. i tug city testinq MAO�Rr4 iOafKO/�4�t tumn CttV testwiQ NORMAL EXCAVATION OVERSIZE MINIMUM? PROPOSED EXCAVATION FOOTING —�� LIMITS / TOPSLI!: 2, j UNSLITAbLE 1 ( SOILS COMPACTED FILL I ` � I I I j I i I � � I COMPETENT SOILS K D —� I i i OVERSIZE FOR SWAMP OR -EXTREMELY SOFT SOIL CONDITIONS 4 I A11klML''�` EXCAVATION LIMITS PROPOSED FOOTINGS SK'ANip DEPOSITS OR 5 SOFT SOILS I r 2 t COMPACTED FILL D lz i .� COMPETENT SOILS 2D EXCAVATION OVERSIZE JOB NO. SCALE: NONE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY IL.— CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING APPLICATION 78045 Application No. Please Print Clearly or Type_ Street Location of Property James Circle North Legal Description of Property Part of Lots I & 2, Block 3, Brooklyn Center Industrial Park (Tract B .of proposed subdivision) Owner Brooklyn Center Industrial Park, Inc. Address 6100 Summit Drive 55430 Phone No. 561-7350 Applicant Mr. Ems System, Inc. (Henry Kristal ) Address 1664 University Ave. - St. Paul 55105 Phone No. 645-6473 Type of Request: Rezoning Subdivision Approval Variance X Sete & Bldg, Plan Approval X Special Use Permit Other: Description of Request: Site and Building plan for proposed Embers Restaurant;special use in the 1-1 (Tnductrial Park) District. Fee $ 50.00 Receipt No. 48671 Applicant's Signature July 6, 1978 Date PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Dates of P.C. Consideration: Approved Denied thi s x L,0- day of 19 subject to the follow- ing coed -il'ons., Ch i rma n - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . rTTv rniihirfl ❑rTTONI CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430 PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING APPLICATION FOR SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL Prior to submission of an application for plan review and approval , prospective applicants should arrange an informational meeting with the Planning staff to discuss preliminary plans and to become familiarized with applicable ordinance and policy provisions. Three (3) copies of the following documents and information shall be submitted, at least 14 days prior to the date of the regular Commission meeting, concurrent with filing the application Tr'equired documents must be consistent with ordinance and policy provisions before an application may be accepted) : 1. A certified site survey drawing by a registered engineer or land surveyor showing pertinent existing condition, accurately dimensioned. 2.* An accurately scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating: a) parking layouts including access provisions; b) designations and locations of accessory buildings; c) fences , walls or other screening, including heights and type of material ; d) outside lighting provisions, type and location; e) curbing. 3.* A landscape plan showing areas to be sodded or seeded; location, size and species of trees and shrubbery. 4.* Building floor plans, elevations, sections and specifications, including materials proposed. 5.* Existing and proposed land elevations, drainage provisions, and utility provisions. 6. Additional drawings, plans or information deemed necessary by the Secretary. *Must be prepared by a reg4st-erect architect or person registered with the State Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers and Land Surveyors, and said drawings/plans shall be so certified. NOTE: Upon approval of plans by the Council and prior to issuance of permits, a Performance Agreement as to approved site improvements and a supporting financial guarantee, in an amount to be determined by the City, are required. Acceptable financial instruments include cash escrow; certificate of deposit; and performance bond. Copies of the Zoning Ordinance may be obtained from the Administrative Office. Questions should be directed to the Department of Planning and Inspection. P/I Form No. 19 Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 78045 Applicant: Mr. Ems System, Inc. Location: Part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Brooklyn Center Industrial Park (Tract B of Proposed Subdivision) Request: Special Use Site and Building Plan Approval The applicant seeks special use permit and site and building plan approval for a 172 seat Embers Restaurant to be located on proposed James Circle south of Freeway Boulevard (adjacent to and southerly of the bowling alley site) . The special use permit is required for a C-2 use in the I-1 District as provided by Section 35-330 (3) (f) which states: Those commercial developments which, in each specific case, are demonstrated to the City Council to be: 1 . Compatible with existing land uses as well as with those uses permitted in the I-1 district generally; 2. Complimentary to existing adjacent land uses as well as to those uses permitted in the I-1 district generally; 3. Of comparable intensity to permute d I-1 Industrial land uses with respect to activity levels; 4. Planned and designed to assure that generated traffic will be within the capacity of available public facilities will not have an adverse impact upon the Industrial Park or the community; and, which are described in Section 35-322, Subsection 1 (a) through 1 (j) ; 3 (c); 3 (d) ; and 3 (g) through 3 (j) . Such commercial developments shall be subject to I-1 district requirements of Section 35-400 and 35-413 and shall otherwise be subject to the ordinance requirements of the use classification which the proposed development represents. Plans have been reviewed by the staff and revisions have been requested of the applicant. The applicant has also been made aware of a proposed center island on James Circle to assist traffic flow into and out of this site as well as adjacent sites. The plans indicate 93 parking stalls which is one more than required by the ordinance. Included in the 93 parking stalls are two designated handicapped parking areas and ramping from the parking lot to assist in providing handicapped accessibility to the building. There has also been discussion regarding the Commission's and the Council 's feeling that mansard treatment, where provided, be on all four sides of the structure, and that an acceptable decorative block be provided. The Commission may well wish to further review these items with the applicant. We will be pre- pared to review the plans in more detail with the Commission on Thursday evening. Notice of public hearing has been sent. i Approval would be subject to at least the following conditions: I . Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 7-13-78 Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 78045 continued: 2. Site, grading, drainage, utility and berming plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site Performance Agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure completion of approved site improvements. 4. The permit is issued to the applicant as operator of the facility and is nontransferable. 5. The permit is subject to all applicable ordinances, codes, and regulations, and violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation. 6. The property shall be subdivided by plat or registered land survey prior to the issuance of permits. 7. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 8. The building is to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA Standard No. 13. 9. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 7-13-78