Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 05-31 PCP 3 City of BROOKLYN CENTER PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MAY 31,2012 REGULAR SESSION 1. Call to Order: 7:00 PM 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes—May 17, 2012 Regular Meeting 4. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 5. Planning Application Items a) Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home, Inc. Planning App. No. 2012-003 Reconsideration of a proposed Development Plan/Site and Building Plan for a new four-story, 97 bed nursing care center (Phase I) and parking areas; and the future development plan (Phase II) of a 38-unit senior independent living facility —located at 5401 & 5415 —691h Avenue North [This item was TABLED from the May 17, 2012 meeting] b) Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home,Inc. Planning App. No. 2012-007 PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration of a proposed Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of Maranatha 2nd Addition- located at 5401-5415 691h Avenue North. 6. Presentations a) Shingle Creek/West Mississippi Watershed District Third Generation Plan — Second/Updated presentation by Wenck Engineers & Scientists - Joint Meeting of the City's Citizen Advisory Committees - Park and Recreation Commission and City Planning Commission 7. Other Business 8. Adjournment MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION MAY 17, 2012 ROLL CALL Chair Rahn, Commissioners Scott Burfeind, Kara Kuykendall, Stan Leino, Carlos Morgan and Stephen Schonning were present. Also present were Councilmember Carol Kleven, Secretary to the Planning Commission Tim Benetti, Director of Business & Development, Gary Eitel, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Michael Parks was absent and excused. CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Rahn at 7:00 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—APRIL 26, 2012 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Burfeind, to approve the minutes of the April 26, 2012 meeting as submitted. Chair Rahn abstained since he was not at the meeting. The motion passed. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Rahn explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. APPLICATION NO. 2012-004 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-004, a proposed amendment to the City of Brooklyn Center's 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update changing a "PS-Public and Semi-Public" land use designation to "MF-Multi-Family (High Density)" for the property located at 5401 — 69`h Avenue North (Maranatha Homes Care Center property. This application was tabled at the April 12, 2012 Planning Commission meeting. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 5-17-12 for Application No. 2012-004.) Mr. Benetti described the history of the property and how the zoning and Comprehensive Plan amendments evolved over the years since the facility was constructed in 1959. He also explained to the Commission how the application should be evaluated based on the city's Rezoning and Evaluation Guidelines and Land Use and Redevelopment Objectives. He further explained Housing Goals and Objectives which should be used in evaluating the Land Use Amendments. Mr. Benetti stated that the city's recommendation is to create a new MF-Mixed "Enhanced" (Multi Family Mixed High Density Residential with Enhanced Setbacks) zoning district/land use category. By creating this land use category and determining that the site must maintain the 5-17-12 Page 1 enhanced land use setbacks, the developer cannot do anything in the areas that the city calls out as enhanced. The PUD approval would lock the desired setbacks on the site. PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-004 There was a motion by Commissioner Burfeind, seconded by Commissioner Schonning,to reopen the public hearing on Application No. 2012-004, at 7:19 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. Mr. John Mehrkens with Maranatha, stated that they met with the neighborhood at an open house and met with staff several times in the last few weeks. He added that they concur with the staff s recommendation and they have resubmitted drawings for review by staff to indicate the changes proposed. Randy Christianson, 7001 Regent Ave N, stated he is still opposed to this plan and his biggest concern is the fit of the building on the site. He stated that he feels they will go back to the old plan and build a taller building. He added that he feels there is not enough parking on the site and the building will take away the view and eliminate daylight and sunshine from the neighboring properties. Commissioner Kuykendall stated that she feels he is speaking on behalf of the neighbors and she wanted to know if Mr. Christianson feels the proposed plan is worse than what is there now. Mr. Christianson responded that the change will dramatically affect the neighborhood and there will be more traffic around the neighborhood. Commissioner Kuykendall stated what the city is trying to do is fulfill the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and assist a good business partner in the city with a building that will be aesthetically appealing. She added that they will make sure there is adequate parking and the approved plan is followed. She also stated that they need to weigh the pros and cons and how this development affects the community as a whole. Mr. Christianson responded that this is a small neighborhood within the community and while some things are good for a neighborhood, that doesn't mean they are a good fit. He added that the senior apartment addition to the site in 1987 was not a good fit to the neighborhood and added more rentals to the area. Chair Rahn again asked Mr. Christianson if he feels what exists is better than what is being proposed. Mr. Christianson stated that the other neighbors are not here because they feel that the Commission does not care what the neighbors think and will approve this no matter what. Commissioner Kuykendall asked if he would prefer that the facility be removed and it be replaced with single family homes? Mr. Christianson stated that single family homes would be a better fit. Chair Rahn stated that this facility is more than a business; it is home to many people. 5-17-12 Page 2 Ray Christianson, 6803 Toledo Ave, stated that he has lived there for 47 years and Maranatha guaranteed that the R-1 would stay R-1 forever. He stated he feels what they want to do will not fit on that property and they should put it somewhere else. He added that maybe if they would have updated their property, and taken better care of it over the years, they would not have to tear the business down. Tom Schultz, 6831 Toledo Ave N, stated that he understands that Maranatha has property rights and he understands there has been a dramatic change in the plans submitted. He feels that they are putting the cart before the horse and the zoning should not take place until the site plan is approved. Mr. Randy Christianson, stated his big concern is if they go ahead with the land use is there a way to turn it back? Mr. Benetti stated that the land use amendment is conditioned so that it only becomes valid if the PUD is approved by the City Council. Further, PUD rezoning must comply with the underlying land use and final approval must come from the City Council and the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Christianson asked if they could also apply for an amendment to the PUD. Mr. Benetti replied that an amendment can be made to an approved PUD, however, the PUD sets in stone a development concept and if an applicant wants to change a plan, they must reapply for an amendment to the previously approved PUD and go through the approval process once again. Carlos Morgan arrived at 7:24 p.m. Andrea Kronbeck, 6825 Toledo Ave N, stated she spends a lot of time outside and doesn't want to be outside looking at a tall building with the sun being blocked. She also stated that this isn't a small town feel and someone was out surveying her property and they said they were making sure water wouldn't get onto her yard. She stated she is concerned how construction will affect her property. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Morgan, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2012-004. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. i Commissioner Leino stated that he is struggling with the comments made by the residents, however, the applicant is attempting to make a better place for its residents and he appreciates that. He added that the City can advance a goal in the Comprehensive Plan by approving this application but he might not seem totally in favor if his own property abutted this site. Commissioner Burfeind stated that they have had five weeks to think about this and he still remembers a question asked at the last public hearing regarding how the City benefits from this. He further described a recent visit to a new senior facility and was amazed at how the building was an improvement to the area and the community as well as the quality of life for its residents. 5-17-12 Page 3 Commissioner Burfeind stated that it is the Planning Commission's responsibility to make sure this is done and done right. He stated he also understands how the neighbors feel but if he lived next to the building he would be in favor of it because the people that live there are residents of the city of Brooklyn Center. Commissioner Schonning stated that his mother worked in a critical care unit of a nursing home and he spent many hours in a nursing home as a child. He added that he is thrilled that Presbyterian Homes is willing to do something with the facility to improve the lives of the residents in the nursing home because what is there now is obsolete and very outdated. Chair Rahn stated the use of the land has been established since it was built in 1959 and to be consistent with the recommendations of staff, he is in favor of the Enhanced Mixed Use since it deals with some of the challenges where the property abuts R-1 properties. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-05 RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FROM "PS-PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC" TO "MF-MIXED ENHANCED" (MULTI- FAMILY MIXED HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WITH ENHANCED SETBACKS) RELATIVE TO LAND GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE CITY, ADDRESSED AS 5401 —5415 69TH AVENUE NORTH There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-05. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, Leino, Morgan and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its May 29, 2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. APPLICATION NO 2012-003 MARANATHA CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST HOMES, INC. Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-003, a proposed rezoning of property located at 5401-5415 69th Avenue North, from R6 Multiple Family Residence and R1 One Family Residence to new PUD-MIXED R5/R6 (Multiple Family Residence), along with a proposed site and building development plan for a new four story, 97 bed nursing care center (Phase I) and a future development plan (Phase II) of a 38 unit senior independent living facility. This application was tabled at the April 12, 2012 Planning Commission meeting. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 5-17-12 for Application No. 2012-003.) Mr. Benetti stated that the Development/Site and Building Plan review and consideration under this PUD Application must be tabled or postponed to the May 31, 2011 meeting. 5-17-12 Page 4 PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-003 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Burfeind, to reopen the public hearing on Application No. 2012-003, at 8:07 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. Mr. Randy Christianson, 7001 Regent Ave N, stated that he would like to review the revised plan closer and he feels that the underground parking is not truly underground. He also feels that the tallest part of the building is closer to his parent's home than on the previous plan. He feels that rezoning a section at a time creates a bunker effect for the neighbors. He stated that his parents are seniors and they live in their home so that is senior housing. He questions if the City needs anymore senior housing and he would like to see some statistics on the need for these types of facilities. He stated that the second building constructed in 1987 was built as senior housing and is now assisted living. He asked what dictates what these buildings will become when there is no longer a need for senior housing. He also feels that more people bring their elderly parents home and not to these communities. Tom Schultz, 6831 Toledo Ave N, asked for clarification on the location of the parking areas since it appears that on the new plan there are parking places and the road next to the single family homes. He feels that the location of this area encroaches into the 100 ft. setback and the green zone and will create noise for the neighbors. He also feels that a 2 '/2 story building is actually taller than that with a high pitched roof. Chair Rahn asked for clarification on the parking requirements. Mr. Benetti explained that the original 64 unit building required two parking spaces per unit which required 120 spaces on the site. They were not able to meet 120 spaces, which required them to provide a proof of parking to the city. However, the site does not require a lot of parking since the site was for older people who typically don't drive much. Mr. Christianson asked if the rezoning changes if the site plan is not approved. Mr. Benetti stated if rezoning moves forward, it is based on an approved redevelopment plan. If the plan is determined inappropriate, the City Council can send it back to Maranatha for resubmittal and the PUD and rezoning are tied together. Mr. Christianson stated he feels that the parking on the plan is not adequate. Commissioner Burfeind stated that he agrees that the proposed parking needs to be looked at further. Mr. Eitel stated that the city's ordinances regulate parking requirements on the site. However, a proof of parking can be provided to verify that there is existing adequate parking on the site. Commissioner Leino stated that he understands that a traffic analysis will be provided with the site plan review and that will provide an opportunity to look at the parking further. 5-17-12 Page 5 CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner, seconded by Commissioner Burfeind , to close the public hearing on Application No. 2012-003. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-06 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-003 SUBMITTED BY MARANATHA CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST HOME, INC., TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5401- 5415 — 69TH AVENUE NORTH FROM R1 (ONE FAMILY RESIDENCE) AND R6 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE) TO A NEW PUD-MIXED R5/R6 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-MIXED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE) DISTRICT There was a motion by Commissioner Burfeind, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-06. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, Leino, Morgan and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its May 29, 2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. APPLICATION NO. 2012-007 MARANATHA CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST HOMES, INC. Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-007, consideration of a proposed Preliminary Plat of Maranatha 2nd Addition, for property located at 5401-5415 691h Avenue North to replat two existing lots into one large single lot for a senior apartment and nursing care campus. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 5-17-12 for Application No. 2012-007.) Mr. Benetti stated that a public hearing has been scheduled and notices sent to surrounding property owners, however, due to delays in staff receiving plans with adequate time for review staff is recommending that the application be tabled until May 31, 2012. PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-007 There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2012-007, at 8:32 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. TABLE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to table the public hearing on Application No. 2012-007. The motion passed unanimously. 5-17-12 Page 6 The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. ACTION TO RECOMMEND TABLING OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-007 SUBMITTED BY MARANATHA CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST HOMES, INC. FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to table Planning Commission Application No. 2012-007. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, Leino Morgan, and Schonning. And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Planning Commission will continue the public hearing for Planning Commission Application No. 2012-007 at their May 31, 2012 meeting. APPLICATION NO. 2012-006 LOREN VAN DER SLIK/GATLIN DEVELOPMENT Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-006, a request for preliminary plat and site and building plan approval related to the former Brookdale Mall Food Court building, now part of the new Shingle Creek Crossing PUD located at 1300 Shingle Creek Crossing. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 5-17-12 for Application No. 2012-006.) Mr. Benetti explained that upon further review and consideration, Gatlin Development Company has requested Planning Commission Application No. 2012-006 be withdrawn. He added that the applicant intends to resubmit a new Shingle Creek Crossing PUD amendment request along with an updated Site and Building Plan for the old Food Court Building, and an updated Preliminary Plat for certain lots inside this PUD project site. These items will potentially be reviewed at the June 28, 2012 meeting. ACTION TO ACCEPT THE WITHDRAWAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-006 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK FOR GATLIN DEVELOPMENT FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to accept the withdrawal of Planning Commission Application No. 2012-006. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, Leino, Morgan and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEM There were no discussion items. 5-17-12 Page 7 OTHER BUSINESS— SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING UPDATE Mr. Eitel provided an update of the Shingle Creek Crossing development including showing some aerials of the site that show the near completion of Wal-Mart. He also demonstrated the proposed revisions to the site including the locations of various retail buildings and restaurants There was no other business. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Leino, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:02 p.m. Chair Recorded and transcribed by: Rebecca Crass 5-17-12 Page 8 3 rBRII TER Planning Commission Report Application Filed on 03/15/12 Meeting Date: May 31, 2012 City Council action should be taken by 05/14/12 (60 Days) REVIEW EXTENDED to 07/13/12 Application No.: 2012-003 Applicant: Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home, Inc. Location: 5401& 5415 —691h Avenue North Request: Approval of a Development/Site & Building Plan to a new Planned Unit Development INTRODUCTION Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, Inc. (PHS), acting on behalf of Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home, Inc., is requesting consideration of a Development/Site Plan under a new Planned Unit Development (PUD), which would allow the development of the subject site with a new three-story, 97-bed skilled nursing care facility and related parking areas, along with a proposed 38-unit senior independent living facility. This PUD is planned for the redevelopment of the exiting Maranatha Nursing Home and Senior Apartments campus, located at 5401& 5415 - 69th Avenue North. This report will provide brief background information, an updated analysis, and suggested recommendations for the Development/Site Plan component of this PUD request. This item is being presented under a continued public hearing from the April 12th meeting, with follow-up noticed provided to the surrounding property owners (within 350-ft. of the subject site). PUD PROCESS A Planned Unit Development proposal includes the rezoning of land with a PUD designation followed by an alpha-numeric designation of the underlying zoning district; or in this case R5 and R6 respectively. These underlying zoning districts provide the regulations governing uses and structures within the new PUD. The rules and regulations governing these districts would apply to the development proposal. One of the purposes of the PUD district is to give the City and Developers the needed flexibility in addressing development and redevelopment issues. Regulations governing uses and structures may be modified by conditions ultimately imposed by the City Council on the development plans. The Planning Commission should refer to City Code Section 35-355, which addresses standards and provisions allowed under a Planned Unit Development proposal. BACKGROUND The Maranatha campus consists of two separate lots. The nursing home parcel (5401 — 69th Ave.) is 3.78 acres in size and is situated in the RI district. The existing 64-unit senior assisted living facility (5415 — 691h Ave.) is 3.28 acres in size and situated in the R6 district. The combined area of these sites is 7.06 acres. These two centers are owned and operated by PHS. PC 04-12-12 Page 1 of 14 (%nvK BR AO -1 3 CF.NTF R The nursing home facility was built in 1959 and expanded in 1994. It is understood this nursing home use was approved as a special use under the R1 district regulations at that time, under provisions set-forth in Sect. 35-310, Sect. 2.g. as "Other, non-commercial uses required for the public welfare in an RI district as determined by the City Council". The senior assisted living apartments were created in 1987 by the filing of a new plat (Maranatha Addition) and rezoning from RI (One Family) to R6 (Multiple Family Residence). The four-story, 65 unit apartment was completed in 1988. The subject site is surrounded by R3–Multiple Family Residence to the north, known as The Ponds/Mallard Creek Townhome development; R1-One Family Residence to the northeast, east and south; and a large, multi-family apartment complex to the west, which is actually located in the City of Brooklyn Park. Y P 5 x ,n,nrzyl}A[far, - - 02 R3 L JR1 �PUDICIA �R3 -1' C7!R51R4-PUD/C2 R4 CIA PUD/11 R5 C2 PUDIRI -Re . ' 11 PUDIR3 I _ -PUDMIXED F w�6"'.' �4r..t _ 2 «sn¢« 01 ��RI "U The current land use designation of this site is under the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan is MF- g Y p Multi-Family Residence and PS–Public/Semi-Public. The Commission approved a recommendation to change the Maranatha properties from this PS and MF to a new MF-MIXED ENHANCED (Multi—Family Mixed High Density Residential with Enhanced Setbacks), which would facilitate the proposed rezoning comprehended under this PUD Application. This new PUD will provide the ability for Maranatha to continue to operate a nursing care facility on the site, with the original (existing) special use to effectively remain in place. Upon completion of this nursing care addition, Maranatha will remove the old nursing home facility, and intends to complete Phase II of this redevelopment project within 3-5 years (per the original narrative). Zoning Sect. 35-314 – R5 Multiple family Residence allows for multiple family residential uses up to 2.5 to 3 stories in height, with a minimum 2,700 sf or land area per unit. Section 35-315 – R6 Multiple Family Residence allows for multiple family dwellings up to 4 to 5 stories in height, PC 04-12-12 Page 2 of 14 X R q n(/.3'N TFFI with a minimum of 2,200 sf. of land per unit. These standards will be addressed later in this report as they pertain to the amount of density to be allowed under this PUD plan. CONTINUATION of ANALYSIS As the Commission is aware, this item was tabled at the April 12, 2012 meeting in order to give Maranatha representatives an opportunity to meet with the residential neighbors and discuss or determine a future plan of the proposed Phase II of this PUD plan. This Phase II would replace the old nursing home facility once it is demolished. On May 3, 2012 Maranatha conducted another open house, which was intended to provide a design "charrette" with the neighbors. The following day, Maranatha representatives provided city staff an updated concept/site plan of the Maranatha site. The plan was adjusted to illustrate the original planned nursing care facility in the same location, and readjusted the original layout to the Phase II area. Maranatha agreed to construct a 2.5 story (instead of original 4-story) building, with the ability to maintain a level up to 38- residential units for future senior housing development. The Developer was encouraged by Staff to create greater setbacks from the single family zoned properties, as much as possible. Staff suggested a 100-foot setback along the east line, even though a 48-50 setback would be required (setback must equal twice the height of the building). Maranatha's plan showed a majority of the new building would meet this 100-ft. setback, except for the winged area which showed a 76.75- ft. setback. The plan also illustrated 104 parking spaces, with 44 additional spaces under a "proof-of- parking" arrangement. It is anticipated that at least 38 parking spaces will be provided under the proposed 2.5 story independent living facility, providing up to 186 spaces (assuming all spaces shown installed). Upon City Staffs' review of this plan and a follow-up meeting with Maranatha representatives, it was recommended by staff to maintain the 100-foot setback all along the east boundary, reshape the ponding areas, and illustrate as much proof of parking as possible. This new site plan and related attachments were submitted to the City on May 16, 2012. This amended report and analysis contained herein reflects this May 16th submittal. DEVELOPMENT PLAN/SITE & BUILDING PLAN REVIEW Phase I still calls for the construction of a three-story, 97-bed, 84-unit skilled nursing care facility. This facility will provided nursing care for transitional, long-term care, and/or memory care services. Floors are equipped with common areas such as kitchen and dining areas; living/congregation areas; conference rooms; exam rooms; activity and therapy rooms; utility rooms; and offices. The nursing care will also provide an small fenced in "memory garden" area for its residents. A small, separate utility/maintenance garage is also planned on the southern end of the westerly parking area. The site will be improved with five ponding or rainwater treatment areas, with the larger pond PC 04-12-12 Page 3 of 14 3 rBR II'L!TFR located between the nursing care and future 38-unit facility serving as the main storm water retention facility. The existing site contains 110 designated spaces, consisting of 99 surface spaces and 11 garage stalls. The new nursing care facility will replace and be constructed over the existing 54 stall parking lot located to the south of the assisted living apartments. The detached garage structure will be removed as part of this improvement. The surface parking located to the north of the nursing care buildings consists of 34 spaces and only 11 spaces on the north side of the senior apartments. Plans call for the installation of 81 parking stalls to the north of the site, with 23 stalls to the west of the new nursing care center, or 104 spaces. PHS indicated up to 65 employees on the largest shift would be using this site on a daily basis. These parking areas will need to accommodate these employees, along with residents and visitors to the site. The parking analysis and recommendations will be provided later in this report. ❖ BUILDING The building elevations and floor plans for the proposed building addition are attached to this report. The building's exterior will be comparable on each of the three buildings on the site, with decorative face brick on the lower elements and entries; rock-faced CMU wainscoting or banding along the lower window levels; vertical fiber cement board and battens around the doorway entries and end corridor window banks; vinyl horizontal siding along the first two levels; and vinyl shake-style siding on the upper floor. The building will be topped off with pre- finished metal fascias and typical, earth-tone colored asphalt shingles. The first floor is planned to have a "Community/Chapel" room, along with a kitchen and small deli. Assuming the kitchen and deli will only serve the on-site residents, staff and visitors, and not necessarily the general public, Staff does not have any objections to these uses. The chapel however, may require acknowledgment and tacit approval under the PUD, as "chapels, churches, temples and synagogues" are considered a special use in the R1, R2 and R5 residential districts. Staff assumes this chapel would be available to the residents and their visitors only and not necessarily open to the general public. The chapel space appears minor in scope and is not a major concern to Staff. Under R5 and R6 zoning district, new residential buildings must comply with the following standards: Land Area Width Front Rear Side Corner District (SF/Unit) 1) Feet (2) (5)(6) (3)(5) 2 R5(See Sec. 35-410) 2,700/unit 100 35 (4) 40(4) 15 (4) 25 (4) R6(See Sec.35-410) 2,200/unit 100 50(4) 40(4) 20(4) 50(4) 4. When a building of 2-1/2 stories or more in an R5, R6,R7,CIA or C2 zone abuts an RI or R2 zone,the setback of this building from the RI or R2 property shall be no less than twice the height of the building. Under the PUD process, a reduction of setbacks may be considered, if certain provisions or conditions are offered into the plans, such as buffering or screening measures, which may help PC 04-12-12 Page 4 of 14 )A"L 1'1V U/!(l L'F" J ER reduce any perceived impacts upon the neighboring properties. The plans call for some landscaping and screening along the south edge, which will be addressed in the "Landscape/Screening" section of this report. Since this Maranatha Care campus, which is located in the R6 (and a proposed PUD Mixed R5/R6 zone), abuts an R1 (One Family) zone, the setback standard of"twice the height of the building" comes into play. The new nursing care building is planned to have a 64-foot setback (at its closest point) from the south lot line, which increase to 71.5-ft. at the other end. The side yard setback is 74 feet from the west line. The Applicant's architects indicated the building's wall height of 32 feet, which would effectively meet this double setback standard and acknowledged under this PUD Plan approval. The Development/Site Plan also identifies a future 2.5 story, 38-unit independent living facility, which would replace the old nursing home buildings once it is removed. This residential building is identified under a Phase II of this PUD. The narrative originally identified this building as a "29-38 unit" apartment, on account of the unknown allowed density the City will provide under this PUD. Allowable density of a particular site is calculated based on the following ratios: Land Area District/Use SF/Unit Density R5 (See Sec. 35-410) 2,700/unit 19.8 units/acre* R6 See Sec. 35-410 2 200/unit 16.13 units/acre* Nursing Care Homes 50 beds/acre *calculated at 43,560 sf.(I acre)divided by 2,700 sf.or 2,200 sf.,respectively The total site is 7.06 acres in size. The 97-bed nursing care requires 1.94 acres of area (97/50 = 1.94). The remaining 5.12 acres is left to accommodate the existing senior assisted living and future independent living centers, which is calculated as follows: R5: 5.12 ac. x 16.13 units/ac. = 83 allowable units R6: 5.12 ac. x 19.8 units/ac. = 102 allowable units Deducting the existing 64 units leaves 19 to 38 available units for the Phase II portion of this PUD site. By recommending approval of the rezoning element of this PUD at the May 17, 2012 meeting, the Commission acknowledged this site may accommodate up to 38 units as shown. The new senior housing center is shown with a 100-ft. setback, which is a buffer space that City Staff strongly encouraged Maranatha designers to adhere to, in order to provide added separation and sunlight to the rear yards of the neighboring residential properties along Toledo Avenue. The new building would be accessed off the new fire lane/ring road for this site. The parking is planned to be installed underground, with up to 38 stalls or more if space is available. Maranatha did not provide an elevation plan or sample picture or design of this 2.5 story facility. Nevertheless, this new facility will need to match or exceed those standards presented under this PC 04-12-12 Page 5 of 14 L'!/1'n! G'F.N7'N PUD plans for the new skilled nursing facility and senior assisted living facility. The building illustrated under this future Phase II of this PUD plan is not officially approved until later, when the Applicants will be required to submit a new Site and Building Plan for said building. Any changes or modifications PHS (or any other future owners of this site) would propose on this Phase II area, and which reflects anything different, either more or less than what is approved under this PUD Plan (and PUD Agreements) would trigger an additional PUD Amendment application and full review before the Planning Commission and City Council. As part of this PUD Agreement, the Applicant is stipulating that the 38-unit facility will be reserved for senior residents only, which is a segment of the population Maranatha primarily serves. ❖ ACCESS/PARKING The subject site is accessed from 691h Avenue North by means of two separate driveways. The westerly drive lines up with Unity Avenue to the north, and immediately splits off into two directions once entering the site. The westerly drive leads to the rear parking and loading areas, while the easterly leads to a smaller parking and drive-aisle area along the north side of the senior apartments, and eventually runs over to the covered entry to the nursing home. The easterly drive does not line up with any cross streets, and provides secondary access to the parking area for the nursing care facility and loading area. These access points are scheduled to remain in place, with the westerly drive continuing to split into two directions, but instead of continuing southerly along the front part of the apartment building, the easterly leg continues along a drive parallel with 69th Avenue to serve as a drive- aisle to the expanded parking lot. The westerly leg continues as it did before along the west edge of the existing and new buildings and serves as the driveway leading to the new 23-stall parking lot. The easterly access is shown with an off-set from the 25-stall parking area immediately to the south of this access. The City Engineer has requested this access be aligned with the parking lot drive aisle at this location. This may require moving this access point slightly farther west along 69th Avenue, or shifting the parking (or all areas) slightly east to meet this alignment. The parking is reduced on the south area and expanded on the north area to accommodate 81 surface parking stalls. The site is shown with 104 total hard-surfaced parking spaces. The new site plan illustrates 87 "proof-of-parking" spaces, or double the original revised plan. If all indicated/illustrated parking were installed,this site could accommodate 191 parking spaces. Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 35-704 [MINIMUM PARKING SPACES REQUIRED], the following spaces are required for each type of use: 1. Residence a. Two spaces per dwelling unit 4. Miscellaneous b. Rest homes, nursing homes, sanitariums, and homes for the aged and for children: One space for every four beds plus one space for every two employees and one space for each staff doctor. PC 04-12-12 Page 6 of 14 3 rVR �z ,v TFK I n 1987, the west parcel was created; rezoned to R6 Multiple Family; and the new senior apartment facility was constructed. This new facility required 130 parking spaces; however, Maranatha owners were approved to provide only 95 spaces, with an arrangement for 35 proof of parking spaces under a recordable covenant. The Staff report from the 1987 application indicated: "Staff sees no problem with a deferral of 35 spaces in as much as the project is geared toward elderly residents. A proof-of-parking covenant, however, will need to be filed with the plat at the County. " These 35 spaces were to be installed in the event the site became deficient or congested(as determined by the City), which never occurred. The 1987 Site Plan also noted the existing nursing home facility needed 48 spaces, which were demarcated on the approved plans, but apparently these were never installed according to the plan layout. In 1994, Maranatha received approval to construct the addition to the mid-wing of the nursing home. The Planning Report indicated the nursing care site required 66 spaces, but only 53 spaces were noted (and approved) as being sufficient for the nursing home needs. The 13 deficient spaces would be provided in an additional proof of parking arrangement between the Owner and City, which is also unconfirmed if said agreement exists. By today's count, the existing nursing care property only shows 37 spaces on this easterly parcel. Today, the entire Maranatha site appears to have only 110 usable spaces. As was noted in the April 12th report, holding Maranatha to our current City Code parking standards, and based on the existing senior apartment plus the new nursing care facility, this redeveloped site would need to accommodate the following number of parking spaces: • 64-units (Senior Apts.): 64 x 2 = 128 spaces • 97 beds (nursing home): [1 per 4 beds = 24 stalls] + [1 per 2 emp. @ 65 = 33 stalls], or 57 spaces • COMBINED USES: 128 + 57 = 185 required parking spaces Adding in the new 38 unit senior independent living facility (at 2 per unit) would require an additional 76 spaces, or 261 total required parking spaces. At the April 12th and May 17th meetings, a number of residents indicated the large number of vehicles entering/exiting this site; a request to make Maranatha add center turn lanes or passing lanes on 69th Avenue; and does the new Development Plan provide enough parking for the existing and future uses. Included with the May 161h Plan updates, Maranatha submitted a new Traffic and Parking Study performed by Westwood Engineering (complete report attached for review). Some findings and conclusions made by the Westwood report (as supported by the 2008 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation and the ITE Parking Generation Manual 4`h Ed. (2010), indicate the following: 1) The trip generations (vehicle movements in and out) of the site under Phase I will not change; and the trips under Phase II should be minimal; PC 04-12-12 Page 7 of 14 t�eun� C%N�Fi R 2) Based on the turning traffic off 69th Avenue, these numbers are not warranted and therefore turn lanes are not recommended; 3) For assisted living facilities, ITE suggests a 0.41 space/unit standard; for skilled nursing care facilities a 0.35 space/nursing bed standard; and for independent living facilities a 0.59 space/unit standard. Based on these reduced standards, the existing assisted living and nursing care under Phase I would only require 61 spaces (versus 185 by City Code). With Phase Il,the total number equates to 83 spaces (versus 261 by Code). 4) The study also included a table which provided a "typical daily demand" of on-site parking, which was determined to be a low of 5 spaces to a high of 80-90 spaces used. 5) The study suggests the City consider utilizing a compromised standard, between the City Code, ITE and Peak Demand thresholds, and further recommended that "Rest Homes, Nursing Homes..." standard of 1 per 4 beds and 1 per employee be used for the nursing care and assisted living, which equates to 73 needed spaces for just these two uses. The independent living under Phase II would be held to 2/unit, or 76 spaces, for a total of 149 spaces. Assuming the new Phase II independent living building can contain 38 underground spaces, this would require at least 111 outside parking stalls, or 7 short of what is planned or illustrated on the new Development Plan. Normally, when a report of this type is presented, Staff assumes the information is correct and accurately reflects new standards or requirements that may be the norm under today's development and redevelopment standards throughout the nation, and even the Twin Cities. However, the parking standards supported by the ITE manual did not reflect too well or comfortably with Planning Staff, due in part to the obvious and drastic reduction in parking spaces that would be required using just these numbers. The peak utilization of 90 parking spaces reveals to Staff that this site requires at least 104 or more spaces to adequately serve its residents, employees and visitors to the site. The recommended (or compromised) standard in the report appears somewhat reasonable, and we feel ultimately the Planning Commission and City Council should make the final determination of any reduced standard. Nevertheless, under this PUD review process, a reduction in parking may be granted, subject to the Applicant demonstrating a real need for reducing said numbers or providing suitable alternatives. Staff is also recommending that in order to ensure that all existing and immediate future parking needs are met, Maranatha should install the 14 spaces to the northwest area of the Assisted Living facility and the first 16 spaces in the "proof-of- parking" area located near the northeast corner. These 30 additional spaces will bring the total site up to 134 spaces, which Staff feels may be adequate and reasonable. If during the operations of the newly redeveloped site it is determined that added parking is warranted, the City will require Maranatha to install the remaining stalls in the proof of parking area. Any additional parking areas should also be improved with sidewalk connections. Staff also recommends a pair of crosswalks/pedestrian paths from the parking areas to the sidewalk along 691h Avenue be included. PC 04-12-12 Page 8 of 14 XFN BR A-L►N 'JER ❖ GRADING/DRAINAGE/UTILITIES The applicant has provided preliminary grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans which are being reviewed by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. His written comments will be attached for the Commission's review. Sanitary sewer and water main are located within the 69th Avenue right of way, and should accommodate this new addition. An existing drainage easement for ponding purposes will need to be vacated as part of the PUD and future platting of this property. Sanitary sewer utility connections between the mains and the buildings would be from the north of the building, while water will be brought in from the west edge of the site. 136- 12 curb and gutter is to be provided around all driving and parking areas. The applicant proposes to provide four ponding areas, located at the four corners of the development site. Storm water would be conveyed to these facilities before being discharged into the natural area storm water systems. The Director of Public Works/City Engineer is reviewing the plan and the Commission's attention is directed to his comments. ❖ LANDSCAPING/SCREENING The basis of a landscaping plan is to provide natural and aesthetic enhancements to a development site; tangible and natural features or elements for the residents and visitors to enjoy; and provide an environmental friendly screen from adjacent uses. The PUD may permit reduction of required standards, but typically the Developer and/or the development site must provide suitable and acceptable buffers or screening measures (such as landscaping, fencing, berming, or combination ) to lessen these impacts upon the adjacent properties. City Code Section 35-410 (Special Requirements in R3-R7 Districts), Subpart 3 provides the following: Where a proposed R3, R4, R5, R6, or R7 development abuts an RI or R2 district other than at a public street line, buffer provisions shall be established. There shall be provided a protective strip not less than 25 feet wide in the case of R6 and R7 uses and not less than 15 feet wide in the case of R3, R4 and R5 uses. The protective strip shall contain an opaque fence or a Council approved substitute. The protective strip shall be landscaped and not be used for parking, garages, driveways, off-street loading or storage. The screening device design must be approved by the City Council as being in harmony with the residential neighborhood and providing sufficient screening of the multiple dwelling area. A proposed fence shall be no less than four feet in height and shall not extend within 10 feet of any street right-of-way. The submitted Site Plan did not include any designs or indicate any fencing or screening device proposed on this site. The Planning Commission should make a determination as to the adequacy of the screening plan and provide a condition that includes the site to be fenced along the easterly and southerly borders. This fence could consist of a 6-8 foot high wooden (cedar preferred) or composite/vinyl materials. If any fence is provided, Maranatha should determine if any fenced-off areas need to be adjusted to accommodate neighbor's garden plots or similar sensitive areas. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan as part of this PUD. All new landscape plans must comply with the City's "Landscape Point System" policy, which is evaluated and determined by PC 04-12-12 Page 9of14 X BR „r/, "IV TFR the LPS worksheet. This 7.06 acre site requires a total of 559.5 landscape points. The current plan submitted by Pope/Louck's Associates indicates 24 new deciduous; 17 new coniferous; and 124 shrub varieties. The preliminary point total awarded to these new plantings is 404 pts. The plans indicate the removal of a few trees and the protection of existing trees on the site, which appear to number 9 deciduous and 13 coniferous trees. These saved trees equate to 168 points. Adding these points into the new landscape points equates to 572 total points, which exceeds the minimum points requirement. Upon review of this updated landscape plan, some of the same concerns raised in our April 12th Planning Report remain, particularly the planting varieties, the numbers, placement, and whether these plantings provide the suitable and appropriate buffers and screening measures from the single-family residences. For example, the east boundary area is shown with two separate areas, with 3 bicolor oaks and 10 dogwoods and 10 viburnum shrubs spread out between these trees. Between these two planting areas are five sta gg ered Austrian pines. LP �I CAT10% � I I I ( I I I i I I _ I I I I g IA --- I c I I PC 04-12-12 Page 10 of 14 XBRA-f'N TF.R These oak trees, viburnum and dogwoods are all deciduous varieties, which will shed leaves and prevent the year-round screening Staff encouraged. Although a new fence may provide the opaque screening required by Code, additional year-round (and natural) screening beyond the top of the fence lines should be encouraged. Therefore, Staff suggests this east buffer strip area be improved with additional coniferous type grouping of trees, and in a similar staggered fashion as the five Austrian pines (as shown in the diagrams below). taw INEnrRAnoN ( I o i . BASIN 'SEE CIVIL I 1 PLANS, O I`\\ • STING,iREFS I ENAR M lion I ' I I I -EIN.FR-----.. � .Fn I o I I City Code Section 35-410 (Special Requirements in R3-R7 Districts), Subpart 8 states: "Nursing Homes shall provide one six inch diameter tree (long-lived hardwood species only)per 14 beds." At 97 beds, this equates to seven 6-inch trees. The landscape plan contains a note which states instead of planting six — 6-inch trees, that twenty-four 2.5 inch caliper trees would be planted. Staff tends to agree that most trees from nurseries typically are shipped or provided at the 2.5 inch caliper sizes, which makes them easier to plant, maintain and increases the survivability rate when replanting. Similarly, the areas along the south boundary may need additional screening or trees, especially along the inside ring of the fire lane road. The original (April 12th) plan also included a number of ornamental trees, such as flowering crabapples and thornless Hawthorns. This new plan is absent of these and Staff would request that some of these trees be included in any updated plan sets. PC 04-12-12 Page 11 of 14 r OFN f(. W TFR ❖ LIGHTING/TRASH The applicant has submitted a lighting plan for this site. All new lighting should meet or exceed those requirements established under Section 35-712 of the city ordinances. City ordinance require that all exterior lighting be provided with lenses, reflectors or down-cast shades so as to concentrate illumination on the property. Illumination is not permitted at an intensity level greater than 3 foot candles measured at property lines abutting residentially zoned property. All new(final) lighting will be analyzed and reviewed prior to issuance of any building permits. There appears to be a new trash compactor/enclosure area located between the existing senior apartments and new nursing care buildings on this site. The plans are absent of any details and we would require these to be submitted as part of any review prior to final site plan and or building permit approvals. The enclosures should be constructed of materials similar to or those that closely match the exterior of the buildings. CITY ENGINEER'S REVIEW The City Engineer indicated to Planning Staff that the original April 9, 2012 review memorandum, which identified certain site design issues and conditions, remains in place as his general comments and conditions that must be addressed prior to issuance of any site or building development permits. Certain conditions and recommendations were also identified in his May 25, 2012 Review Memorandum related to the Preliminary/Final Plat consideration of MARANATHA 2nd ADDITION. Please note some or most of these conditions would ultimately be reviewed and approved later under separate site and building permits. Other conditions or improvements may be subject to approvals as part of this proposed future platting of this site. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission provides a recommendation to the City Council to approve Planning Commission Application No. 2012-003, which comprehends the Development/Site and Building Plan of the subject site, which is an integral part of the proposed Planned Unit Development requested of this site, subject to the following conditions: 1) The Developer/Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer's Review memos, dated April 9, 2012 and May 25, 2012. 2) The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 3) The buildings are to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing systems to meet NFPA standards and connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 4) The location or placement of all fire hydrants and other fire related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief. PC 04-12-12 Page 12 of 14 r FN g„r 3'AN�F R 5) Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 6) The Developer shall submit a site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure the completion of all site improvements. 7) Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 8) An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 9) Plan approval is exclusive of all final signs on this site, including any new freestanding, wall (building) signs and directional signs, which shall remain subject to Chapter 34 of the city ordinances, and subject to separate sign permit submittals and approval. 10) B6-12 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 11) All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center current Standard Specifications and Details. 12) Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City's Engineering Department and applicant shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 13) The Developer shall provide and dedicate all necessary easements as required by the City Engineer, either on the new plat or by separate recordable document/agreements. 14) The Developer shall install the 14 proof of parking spaces on the northwest area of the assisted living facility, and the 16 spaces on the north end of the fire lane/ring road in the northeast corner of the site. 15) The Developer shall provide connecting walkways between-the sidewalk along 69th Avenue North to the parking lot areas, and walkways from interior parking areas to other main door access points or other connecting walkways. 16) The Developer shall install a 6 to 8-foot high screening fence along the easterly and southerly property lines or buffer areas. Said fence/screening device shall be constructed with either cedar wood or composite/vinyl materials, with final style and locations approved by the City Business and Development Director. PC 04-12-12 Page 13 of 14 3 rBR "M �F.7t 17) The Developer shall modify the Landscape Plan to include a clustering of four to five evergreen/coniferous trees between the six bi-color oak trees along the east buffer area, and the southeast corner of the pond area; the Plan should also be modified to provide a small number of ornamental trees into the plan; and Developer agrees to replace any existing significant trees noted to be saved on the Landscape Plans (Sheet L 1-1)that may become damaged or removed as a direct result of construction on this site. 18) The owner of the property shall enter into a utilities and facilities maintenance agreement for maintenance and inspection of utility and storm drainage systems prior to the issuance of permits. 19) Storm water drainage systems shall be approved by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission prior to the issuance of any permits. 20) The Developer shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 21) The owner shall enter into a PUD Agreement and/or Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions Agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be prepared and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. Said agreement shall be filed with the title to the property and shall acknowledge the specific standards and regulations provided by the underlying PUD-MIXED R5/R6 zoning district, as well as all other conditions of approval. This agreement shall further assure compliance with the development/site plans submitted with this application. 22) Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. If the Planning Commission accepts this recommendation and the conditions listed herein, the Commission may elect to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-10, which memorializes the findings in granting said approval of this proposed Development/Site and Building Plan for the new Planned Unit Development on the subject site, and provides for the conditions of approval as they relate to this approval. Attachments 1) Planning Commission Resolution No.2012-10 2) Location/Site Aerial Map 3) Maranatha Narrative(03.15.12) 4) Westwood Engineering Traffic Study 5) City Engineer's Review Memos—dated(04/09/12 and 05/25/12) 6) Full Site Plan Set of Maranatha Care Center PUD 7) Landscape Plan 8) Lighting/Electric Plan 9) Civil Plan Set PC 04-12-12 Page 14 of 14 Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-10 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-003 SUBMITTED BY MARANATHA CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST HOME INC. FOR APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT/SITE AND BUILDING PLAN IN RELATION TO THE NEW PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5401-5415 —69TH AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012-003 submitted by Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home, Inc. (Maranatha) proposes a rezoning from R1 (One Family Residence) and R6 (Multiple Family Residence) to a new PUD-MIXED R5/R6 (Planned Unit Development-Mixed Multiple Family Residence) district, for properties generally located in the northwest quadrant of the City and addressed as 5401 and 5415 - 69`" Avenue North (Subject Site); and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends the rezoning of the Subject Site to facilitate the planned and future redevelopment of the site with a proposed three-story, 97 bed skilled nursing care facility and a future 38-unit senior independent living apartment facility on said properties; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on April 12, 2012, whereby a planning report was presented and public testimony regarding the PUD rezoning and development plan were received, and the action item was tabled; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2012,the Planning Commission reconsidered the rezoning request, whereby an updated planning staff report was presented; the guidelines for evaluating rezoning contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance were presented, along with the provisions and standards of the R5 (Multiple Family Residence) district contained in Section 35-314, along with the provisions and standards of the R6 (Multiple Family Residence) district contained in Section 35-314, and the provisions and standards of the Planned Unit Development district contained in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance; a public hearing was re- opened, public r in light of all ope ed, pub c testimony was received, and the request was duly considered g a testimony received; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2012, the Planning Commission adopted PC Resolution No. 2012-08 which provided a unanimous recommendation to approve this PUD rezoning only, and elected to table consideration of the final Development/Site and Building Plan to the May 31, 2012 meeting; and WHEREAS, on May 31, 2012, the Planning Commission reconsidered Application No. 2012-003, and reviewed and received an updated planning report on the proposed new PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-10 Development/Site and Building Plans, which included the new site and building plans, elevation plans, civil plans, and a traffic and parking study performed by Westwood Engineering, all in conjunction with a new Planned Unit Development of the Subject Site, which plan comprehends the construction of a new three-story, 97-bed skilled nursing care facility and a future 2.5 story, 38- unit senior independent living facility, along with surface parking lots, fire lane/ring road, site lighting, landscaping and screening measures. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that the Development/Site and Building Plan component of the proposed Planned Unit Development submitted under Application No. Application No. 2012-003, as submitted by Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home, Inc. be approved based upon the following findings: 1. The Development/Site and Building Plan is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance; 2. The Development/Site and Building Plan, in relation to the Planned Unit Development proposed on the Subject Site, will facilitate the redevelopment and improvement of this site, will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land; 3. The improvements and utilization of the property as proposed under the planned redevelopment of this site is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with ordinance standards, in particular the incorporation of enhanced setbacks provided under the proposed land use amendment and approved Development/Site Plan; 4. The Development/Site and Building Plan proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city; 5. The Development/Site and Building Plan proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this proposed development can be considered an asset to the community; and 6. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating and approving a Site and Building Plan as contained in Section 35-230 (Plan Approval) and a Development Plan as contained in Section 35-355 (Planned Unit Development) of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the site proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2012-003 be approved PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-10 subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. The Developer/Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer's Review memos, dated April 9, 2012 and May 25, 2012. 2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 3. The buildings are to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing systems to meet NFPA standards and connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 4. The location or placement of all fire hydrants and other fire related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief. 5. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 6. The Developer shall submit a site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of permits to assure the completion of all site improvements. 7. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 8. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 9. Plan approval is exclusive of all final signs on this site, including any new freestanding, wall (building) signs and directional signs, which shall remain subject to Chapter 34 of the city ordinances, and subject to separate sign permit submittals and approval. 10. B6-12 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 11. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center current Standard Specifications and Details. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-10 12. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City's Engineering Department and applicant shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 13. The Developer shall provide and dedicate all necessary easements as required by the City Engineer, either on the new plat or by separate recordable document/agreements. 14. The Developer shall install the 14 proof of parking spaces on the northwest area of the assisted living facility, and the 16 spaces on the north end of the fire lane/ring road in the northeast corner of the site. 15. The Developer shall provide connecting walkways between the sidewalk along 691h Avenue North to the parking lot areas, and walkways from interior parking areas to other main door access points or other connecting walkways. 16. The Developer shall install a 6 to 8-foot high screening fence along the easterly and southerly property lines or buffer areas. Said fence/screening device shall be constructed with either cedar wood or composite/vinyl materials, with final style and locations approved by the City Business and Development Director. 17. The Developer Plan include a clustering of e oper shall modify the Landscape an to g four to five evergreen/coniferous trees between the six bi-color oak trees along the east buffer area, and the southeast corner of the pond area; the Plan should also be modified to provide a small number of ornamental trees into the plan; and Developer agrees to replace any existing significant trees noted to be saved on the Landscape Plans (Sheet L1-1) that may become damaged or removed as a direct result of construction on this site. 18. The owner of the property shall enter into a utilities and facilities maintenance agreement for maintenance and inspection of utility and storm drainage systems prior to the issuance of permits. 19. Storm water drainage systems shall be approved by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission prior to the issuance of any permits. 20. The Developer shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-10 21. The owner shall enter into a PUD Agreement and/or Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions Agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be prepared and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. Said agreement shall be filed with the title to the property and shall acknowledge the specific standards and regulations provided by the underlying PUD-MIXED R5/R6 zoning district, as well as all other conditions of approval. This agreement shall further assure compliance with the development/site plans submitted with this application. 22. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. May 31, 2012 Date Chair ATTEST: Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Chair , Commissioners and the following voted against the same: . Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i I 6901. :6�0 ' 6901 ' v 69TH - ------- ,36 - - °---- Y ---- ------ r _.. z .- ,, s�.�• x. � - r� 6843: 7, CR Vic• '-- f• 7.F �t f . ym 6 a' m u a 4r K r b 6625 .540 1 �. � •�• `� Cdr/ sQ1`s AMR , � � � ` �!`.r . � `��".��e� �Ifp_ rt. ,�i,,,� •' ,� � � ����^. ,68131 t 6813 1 „ y n t `k AIA t A i, 1 $—` ii e3 t > ray (0 v 6 F■` e i. �� '4. di�I_ ..T� " .I .. . '# ,�f.. •. s,/, s� � '.6737 r 68TH q ...ayit:. 'sMOW4�" 66TH AVEN Jolv — 'A,'• PROJECT SITE 0 30 60 120 iao 24F � a Feet [1ROORLVN CENTER � �_ Irtno�cttiuns in Scnior Living C000nanitics SENIOR HOUSING PARTNERS March 15, 2012 Mr. Gary Eitel Director of Business and Development City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 Re: Maranatha Care Center Redevelopment Rezoning and PUD Submittal- March 15, 2012 Dear Mr. Eitel, Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, Inc. (PHS) is seeking approval from the City of Brooklyn Center for the redevelopment of the current 97 bed Maranatha Care Center located at 5401 69th Avenue N., Brooklyn Center, MN. PHS has been awarded an Exception to the Nursing Home Moratorium from the Minnesota Department of Health to redevelop the current facility. Currently the Maranatha site consist of a 97 bed Care Center and a 64 unit Assisted Living Building situated on two parcels, Lot 1 & Lot 2, Block 1 of Maranatha Addition. PHS is in the process of obtaining a preliminary plat combining the two parcels and applying for Rezoning and a PUD to best accommodate the uses and structures of the project. The project will be developed in different phases allowing for the current Care Center to remain in place while the new Care Center is constructed. Phase I of the project will consist of the 97 bed Care Center and will be constructed in phases as follows: ® I(a)—Expand parking on the north side of the site along 69th Avenue 8 I(b)— Demolish existing garages in the south parking lot * I(c)—Construct new 97 bed Care Center • I(d)— Demolish existing Care Center a I(e) —Construct new entrance into the Care Center off of the north parking lot In addition to the construction of the new Care Center we are proposing a future Phase II consisting of 29—38 units of Independent Living apartments. With the addition of Independent Apartments the Maranatha site will provide a full continuum of care for the senior residents of Brooklyn Center. Phase II is anticipated to be constructed within 3 —5 years. The expansion of the north parking lot along 69`h Avenue along with the new parking stalls on the west side of the site will replace the existing south parking lot and will create 107 total parking stalls. This is an increase of 10 stalls from the current 97 stalls. When Phase II is constructed parking needs will be satisfied with a combination of additional surface parking and below grade parking under the building. '1'45 \oith 11an line:A%e. . Suite 100 Rk)W%i11c, Minn�•strta� 55 11 tN%\_,k'itio�ri ali lien-curt, (6t l-�:'�uu; I,� i,�:� i�.;l-!�;U1 < 1-1)12r) As Phase I is a Redevelopment of the current facility and maintaining the same services, number of units and staff, traffic flows and patterns will remain the same. A Landscape Architect has been commissioned by POPE Architects and is in the process of working with the Architect and Civil Engineer to develop a Landscape Plan. The following are responses to guideline questions outlined in the Rezoning Application: A. There is a clear public need to replace the current 50+year old facility as it is functionally and conditionally obsolete. The new PUD would allow for a new up-to-date Care Center serving the older adults of Brooklyn Center. Twenty nine (29) - thirty eight (38) units of Independent Housing in a future phase are also planned for in the PUD allowing for a full continuum of older adult housing and care in one setting. B. The current and proposed zoning is consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classification. C. All permitted uses in the proposed zoning district can be contemplated for development of the subject property. D. There have not been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the property was zoned. E. The redevelopment of Marantha Care Center fits within the city-initiated rezoning proposals as it revitalizes a current site and maintains 97 beds of existing Senior Care within Brooklyn Center along with a proposed future phase of 29- 38 units of Independent Senior housing. F. Rezoned parcel will fully bear the ordinance development restrictions under the approved PUD. G. The subject property is currently suited for the present zoning district. H. The approved Zoning/PUD will allow for the flexibility of multiple types of senior housing within one parcel creating a full continuum of care setting for Brooklyn Center senior residents. I. The redevelopment of Maranatha Care Center is in the interest of older adult population of Brooklyn Center. The new facility will provide an up-to-date living environment along with the latest technology, nursing and physical therapy and spiritual care. PHS looks forward to the opportunity of revitalizing an aging care center and serving the older adults of Brooklyn Center. The development of the new facility will provide 71 private rooms (an increase of 30 over the exiting 40 private rooms) and 13 double rooms. The Resident rooms will be enhanced with private bathrooms including showers and also include a kitchenette with a fridge and sink. In addition to the enhanced resident rooms, community spaces will be added including a Chapel/Community Room, Deli, Large Activity Room, and enlarged PT/OT areas. All of these enhancements will improve the ADA Compliancy, Nurse Call System and Technology of what currently exists within the Maranatha facility. Thank you for your consideration and partnership in this exciting project. Sincerely, Deb Zarbok/Project Developer Senior Housing Partners/Presbyterian Homes Cc: V Tim Benetti/Planning and Zoning Specialist Greg Woollums/POPE Architects W 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie,MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 Westwood TOLL FREE 888-937-5150 www.westwoodps.com MEMORANDUM Date: May 15, 2012 Re: Maranatha Care Center Traffic Technical Memorandum: Review of Traffic Impacts File 20121085 To: Deb Zarbok, Senior Housing Partners From: John M. Hagen, P.E., PTOE Summary As requested, Westwood has completed a review of the traffic-related impacts of the proposed Maranatha Care Center located south of 69th Avenue, between Unity and Toledo Avenues, in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota(see Figure 1: Project Location). The main objectives of this study are to evaluate trip generation, site access, need for turn lanes along 69th Avenue at site access points, parking, and travel demand management opportunities. Per discussions with City staff, a detailed traffic impact study(with peak hour traffic operations analysis at key intersections) will not be required due to the size of the proposed redevelopment. Proposed Redevelopment The existing Maranatha Care Center consists of 64 assisted living units and 97 skilled nursing beds. The proposed redevelopment of the site will occur in two phases. The first phase will consist of the replacement of the existing skilled nursing facility located on the eastern portion of the site with a new skilled nursing facility located on the western portion of the site. The number of skilled nursing beds will remain the same under the existing and build conditions(at 97 beds). Once the new skilled nursing facility is completed,the existing skilled care center will be removed. A potential second phase may include the addition of 38 future independent living units. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2. Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the a.m. and p.m. peak periods and on a daily basis were calculated for the existing and proposed Maranatha Care Center site. The trip generation estimates were Land and Energy DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS c May 15, 2012 Page 2 based on rates provided in the 2008 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation report. The resultant trip generation estimates for the existing and proposed redevelopment are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Trip Generation Estimate: Maranatha Care Center") Average AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Weekday Land Use Size Total In Out Total In Out Total Proposed Assisted Living(Existing) 64 units 170 6 3 9 6 8 14 Skilled Care Center(New) 97 beds 330 11 5 16 7 14 21 Subtotal 500 17 8 25 13 22 35 rA rA Existing Conditions o, Assisted Living 64 units 170 6 3 9 6 8 14 Skilled Care Center 97 beds 330 11 5 16 7 14 21 Subtotal 500 17 8 25 13 22 35 Phase I Net Gain/Loss(l) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Assisted Living(Existing) 64 units 170 6 3 9 6 8 14 Skilled Care Center(New) 97 beds 330 11 5 16 7 14 21 Independent Living 38 units 132 2 3 5 4 2 6 Subtotal 632 19 11 30 17 24 41 a Existing Conditions Assisted Living 64 units 170 2 4 6 9 8 17 Skilled Care Center 97 beds 330 11 5 16 7 14 21 Subtotal 500 17 8 25 13 22 35 Phase II Net Gain/Lossl'l 132 1 2 1 3 1 5 1 4 1 2 6 (Net gain/loss represents the difference in trips generated by the proposed redevelopment as compared to the existing site for each phase. As shown in Table 1,the first phase of the proposed redevelopment will not change the number of trips generated by the existing site. The existing and proposed conditions of the Phase I development will both generate approximately 500 vehicular trips on an average weekday, 25 vehicular trips during the a.m. peak hour(with 17 inbound and 8 outbound), and 35 vehicular trips during the p.m. peak hour(with 13 inbound and 22 outbound). Under the potential future Phase I1,the proposed 38 independent living units will generate approximately 132 vehicular more trips on an average weekday, 5 additional vehicular trips May 15, 2012 Page 3 during the a.m. peak hour(with 2 inbound and 3 outbound), and 6 additional vehicular trips during the p.m. peak hour(with 4 inbound and 2 outbound). Since the proposed redevelopment will not generate more than 10 additional vehicular trips during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours(versus the existing conditions), a detailed traffic operations analysis of the adjacent roadway system is not required by the City of Brooklyn Center. Site Access Access to the existing Maranatha Care Center is provided along 69th Avenue via two driveways. The easterly access is located approximately 180 feet west of Toledo Avenue, and the westerly access is opposite of Unity Avenue(approximately 235 feet west of the easterly access). Both access points are controlled by stop signs, with the 69th Avenue approaches uncontrolled. The easterly access serves the existing northern parking area located to the north of the existing skilled nursing facility. The westerly access serves the southwest parking lot, as well as the visitor parking and resident drop-off area located to the east of the existing assisted living building and north of existing skilled nursing facility, respectively. Visitors and staff currently and in future Phases I and II will have the option to use either access point to enter/exit the site since they are both connected by an internal drive aisle. Access for the proposed future phases will remain in the same location as the existing driveways, and an internal connection between the two driveways will be maintained. Warrant Evaluation of Turn Lanes along 69th Avenue at Site Access Points The City of Brooklyn requested that the need for turn lanes along 69th Avenue at the site access points be evaluated. Brooklyn Center currently does not have a published turn lane policy for the installation of turn lanes within the city. Since 69th Avenue also carries the County Road designation of County State Aid Highway(CSAH) 130, Hennepin County staff was contacted to see if the county currently has a policy for the installation of turn lanes along county roads. Similar to Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County does not currently have a published turn lane policy for the installation of turn lanes along roadways under their jurisdiction. However,the county has, on occasion, used a general rule-of-thumb threshold of 40 to 50 turning vehicles during the peak hour to justify consideration of a turn lane along county roads. Since the maximum number of turning vehicles (along 69th Avenue) at the two driveways combined do not reach 20 vehicles during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour,this County rule-of-thumb threshold for the installation of turn lanes is not met. The Minnesota Department of Transportation(MnDOT), in partnership with the Local Road Research Board (LLRB) has developed a sample policy for the installation of turn lanes. This sample turn lane policy can be based on two approaches: roadway functional classification or traffic operations analysis. Since the additional trips generated by the proposed redevelopment does not trigger the need for a detailed traffic operations analysis, the roadway functional classification approach will be reviewed. The sample MnDOT and LRRB Turn Lane Policy May 15, 2012 Page 4 provides the following table (See Table 2) as guidance for turn lane needs based on functional classification of intersecting roadways. Both the City of Brooklyn Center and Hennepin County classify 69th Avenue as a Collector Roadway. Table 2 Turn Lane Needs Based on Functional Classification of Intersection Roadways(s) Functional Major Street Cross Street Functional Classification .. Classification Arterial Arterial Driveway Principal Arterial LTL LTL LTL LTL KR) N.A. Minor Arterial LTL LTL Min LTL Min LTL Paved Shoulder Collector LTL Min LTL Min LTL Paved Paved Shoulder Shoulder Local Street LLT Min LLT Paved Paved Paved Shoulder Shoulder Shoulder Definitions: LTL=Left Turn lane N.A.=Not Allowed Min LTL=Minimum Length Leh Turn Lane(480 feet=180 feet of taper+ (N.R.)=Intersections of lo(al streets with Principal Arterials are not 300 feet of storage) recommended (a)Source: Minnesota's Best Practices and Policies for Safety Strategies on Highways and Local Roads, MnDOT and LRRB, 2011. As shown in Table 2, turn lanes are not needed at Collector Roadway intersections with private driveways. Therefore, based on a review of the turning traffic on 69th Avenue and given the functional classification of 69th Avenue, turn lanes are not needed on 69th Avenue at the Maranatha Care Center driveways. Parking Analysis The purpose of the parking analysis is to determine if there is sufficient parking available to meet the needs of the proposed redevelopment. The existing Maranatha Care Center has 110 parking stalls(including 11 garage stalls located in the southwest corner of the property). The existing site has 56 proof-of-parking stalls located in two separate areas; 14 stalls of proof-of-parking northwest of the existing assisted living facility, and 42 stalls of proof-of-parking just south of the existing southwest parking lot. The proposed redevelopment will provide 104 parking spaces in two reconfigured parking fields; 81 parking stalls in the northern parking lot and 23 parking stalls in the southwest parking lot (See Figure 2). Staff parking will be provided in the southern spaces of the southwest parking lot as well as the northern spaces in the northern parking lot (closest to 69th Avenue). This will May 15, 2012 Page 5 allow for visitor parking spaces closest to the west and east entrances to the facility. In addition to these 104 parking stalls, the proposed site plan also provides a total of 87 stalls proof-of- parking located in three separate areas; 14 stalls northwest of the existing assisted living facility, 48 stalls just east of the reconfigured northern parking lot and the future independent living facility, and 25 just north of the southern fire lane. An additional 38 parking stalls will be provided in an underground parking garage when the future 38 unit independent living facility is built under Phase II of the proposed redevelopment. Table 3 presents the City of Brooklyn Center zoning requirements versus the ITE estimated demand to determine the total parking demand versus supply for the site under existing and future conditions. The ITE Parking Generation Manual 4th Edition(2010) is often considered an industry standard for parking demand. The City's zoning code requires that assisted living facilities provide two parking stalls for every unit. The ITE demand comparison is based on 0.41 parking stalls per assisted living unit. The City's zoning code also requires that skilled care facilities provide one parking stall for every four beds plus one space for every two employees and one space for each staff doctor. The ITE demand comparison is based on 0.35 parking stalls per skilled nursing bed. Finally,the City's zoning code requires that independent living facilities provide two parking stalls for every unit. The ITE demand comparison is based on 0.59 parking stalls per independent living unit. As shown in Table 3, the Maranatha Care Center is required to provide 185 parking stalls under the existing and future Phase I conditions, and 261 parking stalls under future Phase II conditions according to the City's zoning requirements. This results in a deficit of 75 parking stalls under existing conditions, a deficit of 81 parking stalls under future Phase I conditions, and a deficit of 119 parking stalls under future Phase II conditions. When considering the ITE based demand, Table 3 also shows that the Maranatha Care Center has a parking surplus of 49 parking stalls under existing conditions; and a surplus of 43 and 59 parking stalls under future Phase I and II conditions, respectively. It should be noted that these deficits/surpluses do not include the existing 56 and future 87 future proof-of-parking stalls. The primary difference between the City and ITE values occur in the parking demand needs for the assisted living and independent living land uses. The City of Brooklyn Center parking requirements for assisted and independent living facilities applies the same rate (2 parking stalls per dwelling unit) as any other residential land uses within the City. This rate is almost 5 times greater than the ITE parking demand values for similar assisted living facilities across the country and almost 3.5 times greater than parking demand values of similar independent living facilities. In order to determine which parking demand estimates provide a better representation of the parking needs for the existing Maranatha Care Center, a parking utilization study was conducted. Existing parking demand and supply was measured on Wednesday, May 9 and Thursday, May 10, 2012 between the hours of 5:00 to 9:30 a.m. and 1:00 to 3:30 p.m. These time periods were selected since they coincide with the changes between the night, day, and evening shifts. The results of the parking utilization study are shown in Table 4. May 15, 2012 Page 6 Table 3 Maranatha Care Center Parking Demand: Existing and Future Phase I and II Conditions Parking Demand Parking Parking Surplus/ Land Use Size Rate Demand Supply Deficit City Requirements Assisted Living 64 units 2 per unit 128 110,21 P 75 97 beds ] per 4 beds plus ( ) P Skilled Care Center �,� 57 65 em 1 1 per 2 employees C Totals 185 1102, 1 (75) W ITE Parking Demand Assisted Living 64 units 0.41 per unit 27 Skilled Care Center 97 beds 0.35 per bed 34 110,2) 49 Totals 61 110121 49 City Requirements Assisted Living(Existing) 64 units 2 per unit 128 Skilled Care Center(New) 97 beds I per 4 beds plus 1) 57 104,31 (81) 65 em 1 1 per 2 employees Totals 185 104,31 (81) p ITE Parking Demand Assisted Living 64 units 0.41 per unit 27 (31 104 43 Skilled Care Center 97 beds 0.35 per bed 34 Totals 61 104,31 43 City Requirements Assisted Living(Existing) 64 units 2 per unit 128 Skilled Care Center(New) 97 beds 1 per 4 beds plus 1) 57 142,31 (119) 65 em 1 1 per 2 employees Independent Living(New) 38 units 2 per unit 76 Totals 261 1 142,31 (119) R .0 a+ ITE Parking Demand Assisted Living(Existing) 64 units 0.41 per unit 27 Skilled Care Center(New) 97 beds 0.35 per bed 34 142,31 59 Independent Living(New) 38 units 0.59 per unit 22 Totals 83 142,31 59 (')City requirement also requires one additional stall per staff doctor;however,Maranatha does not have any staff doctors on site. (2)Does not include the existing 56 proof-of-parking stalls. (3)Does not include the future 87 proof-of-parking stalls. >v'b &:>v va � c� N 0 N Table 4 Maranatha Care Center: Evicting Time-of-Daly Demand Di.t1•11111tion", Parking SupplY and Demand Percent .available Parkins Parking 5:00 5:311 6:00 6:31) 7:01) 7:311 8:011 8:311 9:011 1:011 1:30 2:00 2:31) 3:00 Field stalls a.m. a.m. 3.111. 3.111. a.m. a.m. a.m. a.m. a.m. p.m. p.m. p.m. p.m, p.m. t 10 \E - - t 1 t`r 3 f Io SIP, n�lpu 12 12 30 32 38 a9 64 711 7j 79 80 90 78 '9 Total 1111 II" I1"o 2711 r, ;80 6T,r 7 3 82 7 I -2"r � C8" 7-r ''B:I,cd on trukin'ntiltzmwn:mnc Cou,hrted\hN.11 anil 111_�nI' May 15, 2012 Page 8 As shown in Table 4, the peak parking demand for the Maranatha Care Center occurs between 1:30 and 2:30 p.m., when 80 to 90 vehicles are parked on the site. This is not too surprising since this time frame corresponds to the shift change between the daytime and evening shifts (which combine to account for approximately 84 percent of the number of employees that currently work at the facility). Based on our review of the parking demand and supply data presented in Table 4, the existing Maranatha Care Center currently provides more parking (110 stalls)than is needed to currently service the peak parking demand (80 to 90 stalls between 1:30 and 2:30 p.m.) for the existing 64 assisted living units and 97 skilled nursing beds. Therefore, the ITE parking demand numbers provide a better representation of the existing parking needs for the Maranatha Care Center than the City's requirement of two stalls per assisted living unit. Alternatively, instead of using the ITE parking demand values, the City could consider applying a revised parking requirement for assisted living facilities equal to that found in the City Ordinance under the miscellaneous category for"Rest homes, nursing homes, sanitariums, and homes for the aged and for children" (which calls for one parking stall for every four beds plus one space for every two employees and one space for each staff doctor). The resultant parking requirement will be closer to either the existing or ITE based parking demand values. Table 5 shows a comparison of the existing parking demand (from the parking utilization study) with the revised parking requirement for assisted living and the ITE parking demand. Table 5 Comparison of Existing, Revised City Requirements, and ITE Parking Demand: Existing Maranatha Care Center Parking Demand Parking Parking Surplus/ Land Use Size Rate Demand Supply Deficit Existing Parking Demand Assisted Living 64 units �2> Skilled Care Center 97 beds 90 110 20 Totals 90 110(2) 20 Revised City Requirements for Assisted Living Land Use a Assisted Living 64 units 1 per 4 beds plus(1) 16 1 per 2 employees 11012) 37 w 97 beds 1 per 4 beds plus Skilled Care Center 57 65 em p] 1 per 2 em to ees('� Totals 73 110(2) 37 ITE Parking Demand Assisted Living 64 units 0.41 per unit 27 110(2) 49 Skilled Care Center 97 beds 0.35 per bed 34 Totals 61 110�2� 49 (')City requirement also requires one additional stall per staff doctor;however,Maranatha does not have any staff doctors on site. (2)Does not include the existing 56 proof-of-parking stalls. May 15, 2012 Page 9 As shown in Table 5, the parking demand for the existing Maranatha Care Center based on a revised City requirement for assisted living land falls approximately midway between the existing and ITE parking demand for the site. It is therefore recommended that the City of Brooklyn Center consider applying the revised parking requirement for"Rest homes, nursing homes, sanitariums, and homes for the aged and for children"to both the assisted living and skilled nursing components of the Maranatha Care Center. The resultant parking requirements for the proposed future phases of the Maranatha Care Center are shown in Table 6. The ITE parking demand is included in Table 6 for comparison purposes. Table 6 Maranatha Care Center Parking Demand: Future Phase I and II Conditions Based on Revised City Requirements for Assisted Living Parking Demand Parking Parking Surplus/ Land Use Size Rate Demand Supply Deficit Revised City Requirements for Assisted Living Land Use Assisted Living(Existing) 64 units 1 per 4 beds plus�� 16 1 per 2 em to ees 1041" 31 Skilled Care Center(New) 97 beds 1 per 4 beds plus�� 57 65 em 1 1 per 2 em to ees R Totals 73 1041�1 31 r a ITE Parking Demand Assisted Living 64 units 0.41 per unit 27 tz) Skilled Care Center 97 beds 0.35 per bed 34 104 43 Totals 61 1041�1 43 Revised City Requirements for Assisted Living Land Use Assisted Living(Existing) 64 units I per 4 beds plus 16 1 per 2 employees(l) Skilled Care Center(New) 97 beds 1 per 4 beds plus 57 142 2, (7) 65 em p] 1 per 2 employees(l) Independent Living(New) 38 units 2 per unit 76 R Totals 149 1421 (7) s 06" ITE Parking Demand Assisted Living(Existing) 64 units 0.41 per unit 27 Skilled Care Center(New) 97 beds 0.35 per bed 34 142(2) 59 Independent Living(New) 38 units 0.59 per unit 22 Totals 83 142(Z) 59 (')City requirement also requires one additional stall per staff doctor;however,Maranatha does not have any staff doctors on site. (zboes not include the future 87 proof-of-parking stalls. May 15, 2012 Page 10 As shown in Table 6, the Maranatha Care Center will have a surplus of more than 30 parking stalls in the future Phase I conditions with the recommended changes to the City's parking requirements for the assisted living facility portion of the site. Under Phase Il, the Maranatha Care Center may have a deficit of approximately 7 parking stalls unless a portion of the future 87 proof-of-parking stalls are utilized. Travel Demand Management Plan The primary goal of a Travel Demand Management Plan (TDMP) for a specific development is to manage and minimize the number of vehicular trips generated by the site. TDMPs have benefits for a variety of stakeholders, including but not limited to: • Potential benefit to property owners by potentially reducing the number of parking stalls required. • Provides commuting choices for employees and residents. • Lessens the potential traffic-related impacts on adjacent roadway system by lowering peak hour demand. There are four main TDMP strategies that can be implemented to manage and minimize the number of vehicular trips generated by a development: • Public Transit • Carpool—Both informal(set up by individuals) or more formal services (Rideshare) • Vanpool—Can be sponsored by the employer or MetCouncil • Biking/Walking TDMP opportunities for the Maranatha Care Center are somewhat limited due to its land-use and location. It is difficult, if not impossible for employers of skilled nursing facilities to offer telecommuting or flexible work hours for their caregivers(which account for the majority of their on-site staff). Furthermore,there are currently no public transit routes along 69th Avenue, and sidewalks are only provided along the south side of 69th Avenue. Nevertheless, Maranatha can focus their efforts on the following TDMP measures: 1. Designate a TDMP liaison for the site that will maintain, monitor, coordinate, and promote commuting options. 2. Conduct a baseline survey to assess resident and employee commuting habits. 3. Promote alternative modes of transportation during a designated month each year. This could include a display in common areas with information concerning alternative modes of transportation available to residents/staff. 4. Develop move-in material for residents and new employee information on alternative commuter and transportation modes. 5. Provide a location on site for bicycle parking(bike racks or lockable storage area). 6. Promote employee carpool/ridesharing May 15, 2012 Page 11 7. Conduct follow-up surveys and review the TDMP within two years to determine its effectives and make changes as appropriate. Conclusions Based on our review of the proposed redevelopment, we offer the following comments for your consideration: • The first phase of the proposed redevelopment will not change the number of trips generated by the existing site. The existing and proposed conditions of the Phase I development will both generate approximately 500 vehicular trips on an average weekday, 25 vehicular trips during the a.m. peak hour(with 17 inbound and 8 outbound), and 35 vehicular trips during the p.m. peak hour(with 13 inbound and 22 outbound). • Under the potential future Phase II, the proposed 38 independent living units will generate approximately 132 vehicular more trips on an average weekday, 5 additional vehicular trips during the a.m. peak hour(with 2 inbound and 3 outbound), and 6 additional vehicular trips during the p.m. peak hour(with 4 inbound and 2 outbound). • Access to the existing Maranatha Care Center is provided along 69th Avenue via two driveways. Visitors and staff currently and in future Phases I and II will have the option to use either access point to enter/exit the site since they are both connected by an internal drive aisle. Access for the proposed future phases will remain in the same location as the existing driveways, and an internal connection between the two driveways will be maintained • Based on a review of the turning traffic on 69th Avenue and given the functional classification of 69th Avenue, turn lanes are not needed on 69th Avenue at the Maranatha Care Center driveways. • The existing Maranatha Care Center has 110 parking stalls(including 1 I garage stalls located in the southwest corner of the property). The existing site has 56 proof-of-parking stalls located in two separate areas; 14 stalls of proof-of-parking northwest of the existing assisted living facility, and 42 stalls of proof-of-parking just south of the existing southwest parking lot. • The redevelopment (Phase I) is proposing 104 parking spaces in two reconfigured parking fields; 81 parking stalls in the northern parking lot and 23 parking stalls in the southwest parking lot. In addition to these 104 parking stalls the proposed site plan also provides a total of 87 stalls proof-of-parking located in three separate areas; 14 stalls northwest of the existing assisted living facility, 48 stalls just east of the reconfigured northern parking lot and the future independent living facility, and 25 just north of the proposed southern fire lane. Staff parking will be provided in the southern spaces of the southwest parking lot as well as the northern spaces in the northern parking lot (closest to 69th Avenue). This will allow for visitor parking.spaces closest to the west and east entrances to the facility. May 15, 2012 Page 12 • An additional 38 parking stalls will be provided in an underground parking garage when the future 38 unit independent living facility is built under Phase II of the proposed redevelopment. • Based on the City's zoning requirements, the Maranatha Care Center is required to provide 185 parking stalls under the existing and future Phase I conditions, and 261 parking stalls under future Phase I1 conditions. This results in a deficit of 75 parking stalls under existing conditions, a deficit of 81 parking stalls under future Phase I conditions, and a deficit of 119 parking stalls under future Phase II conditions. This deficit does not include the existing 56 and future 87 future proof-of-parking stalls. • When considering the ITE based demand, the Maranatha Care Center has a parking surplus of 49 parking stalls under existing conditions, and a surplus of 43 and 59 parking stalls, respectively, under future Phase I and II conditions. This surplus does not include the existing 56 and future 87 future proof-of-parking stalls. • The City of Brooklyn Center parking requirements for assisted and independent living facilities applies the same rate (2 parking stalls per dwelling unit) as any other residential land uses within the City; and is almost 5 times greater than the ITE parking demand values for similar assisted living facilities across the country and almost 3.5 times greater than parking demand values of similar independent living facilities. • A parking utilization study was conducted in order to determine which parking demand estimate provides a better representation of the parking needs for the existing Maranatha Care Center. Existing parking demand and supply was measured on Wednesday, May 9 and Thursday, May 10, 2012 between the hours of 5:00 to 9:30 a.m. and 1:00 to 3:30 p.m. These time periods were selected since they coincide with the changes between the night, day, and evening shifts. The parking utilization study revealed: • The peak parking demand for the Maranatha Care Center occurs between 1:30 and 2:30 p.m., when 80 to 90 vehicles are parked on the site. • The existing Maranatha Care Center currently provides more parking than is needed to currently service the peak parking demand for the existing 64 assisted living units and 97 skilled nursing beds. Therefore, the ITE parking demand numbers provide a better representation of the existing parking needs for the Maranatha Care Center than the City's requirement of two stalls per assisted living unit • Alternatively, instead of using the ITE parking demand values, the City could consider applying a revised parking requirement for assisted living facilities equal to that found in the City Ordinance under the miscellaneous category for"Rest homes, nursing homes, sanitariums, and homes for the aged and for children". The parking demand for the existing Maranatha Care Center based on this revised City requirement for assisted living land falls approximately midway between the existing and ITE parking demand for the site. May 15, 2012 Page 13 • It is therefore recommended that the City of Brooklyn Center consider applying the parking requirement for"Rest homes, nursing homes, sanitariums, and homes for the aged and for children"to both the assisted living and skilled nursing components of the Maranatha Care Center. • With the recommended changes to the City's parking requirements for the existing assisted living facility, the Maranatha Care Center has a surplus of more than 30 parking stalls in the existing and future Phase I conditions. Under Phase 11, the Maranatha Care Center may have a deficit of approximately 7 parking stalls unless a portion of the future 87 proof-of-parking stalls are utilized. • Travel Demand Management Plan (TDMP) opportunities for the Maranatha Care Center are somewhat limited due to its land-use and location. It is difficult, if not impossible for employers of skilled nursing facilities to offer telecommuting or flexible work hours for their caregivers. Furthermore, there are currently no public transit routes along 69th Avenue, and sidewalks are only provided along the south side of 69th Avenue. Nevertheless, Maranatha can focus their efforts on the following TDMP measures in order to manage and minimize the number of vehicular trips generated by the site: • Designate a TDMP liaison for the site that will maintain, monitor, coordinate, and promote commuting options. • Conduct a baseline survey to assess resident and employee commuting habits. • Promote alternative modes of transportation during a designated month each year. This could include a display in common areas with information concerning alternative modes of transportation available to residents/staff. • Develop move-in material for residents and new employee information on alternative commuter and transportation modes. • Provide a location on site for bicycle parking (bike racks or lockable storage area). • Promote employee carpool/ridesharing • Conduct follow-up surveys and review the TDMP within two years to determine its effectives and make changes as appropriate Attachments: Figures 1 —2 cc: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, City of Brooklyn Center P:120121085 Wocsl Traffic lReportWaranatha Traffic Memo_5-15-2012.docx �^•..�w .'s is�.*a•w..t ._ •{ i.:3' 7 •�\ '" � i+f'�e h�¢�y F s'` 1� +'° �T Aw .. .S liar •Y'7•K�' ` _. -. +Y �°'�ri,� ♦.a V _ °.I1;;1. 130 130 ko } ^��Mi fir alt � ,s ! . F .0 y$ I.q t4vs ��vY,,i1t4 � ��L wl,�• `A •r(�„ 1 I 1� i tf .h.. •rr. � ,,,.L r ;,iC_ j Y T '� '- At ,� ► �g , ( ,y 7. rt'� .` :a♦ v; i t b ' i� ar' 1/..°r f' I.F �.. ' v�,r ,l•*,'F arr-. 4 I 1�,',T, tt j i� '� v r.#tt� r�- i �7- �+ �4• . ON } r i.' oe ♦ .1 .. s� :' i . ..ALA idiam ?-4.0mis A.t 'twIft 0=dnm elm &�".. Base map source: Bing Maps,Microsoft Corporation,2012 May 15,2012 ♦ #20121085 W Wes[woodProtessionalServices,Inc. Project Location 7699 Anagram D- .-Prairie,MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 Maranatha Care Center Traffic Study Figure FAX 952-937-5822 +E TOLL FREE 1-888-937-5150 Brooklyn Center, MN 1 Westwood www westwoodp.com 69TH AVENUE NORTH -- i Z !z O Y J 81 PARKING I.2. STALLS CIO j LL 03 0 v ` ,iO } EXISTING 64 UNIT U ASSISTED LIVING I TO REMAIN r i z,- RAMP > j{ i TOTAL PROOF OF s \X C PARKING (87 STALLS) l\/ FUTURE 1 2 1/2 STORY — 1 f — 38 UNIT I I INDEPENDENT —-I G — FACILITY I I 23 PARKING STALLS NEW 97 BED I SKILLED NURSING FACILITY-TCU/ LTC 1 MC PROPOSED ` — — POND i ' X FIRE LANE Site Plan Source: Pope Architects,Inc.and Presbyterian Homes&Services Not to Scale May 15,2012 #20121085 Site Plan �• Westwood MN 5 Pronal Services.Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie,MN 55344 PHONE 952.937-5150 Maranatha Care Center Traffic Study Figure FAX 952-937.5822 TOLLFREE I-888-937-5150 Brooklyn Center, MN 2 'r/Vestwood www.we�twoodv.rom MEMORANDUM DATE: May 25, 2012 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor Steven L. Lillehaug, City Engineer/Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Public Works—Revised Preliminary and Final Plat Review for MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION Public Works Department staff reviewed the preliminary plat and final plat submittals dated May 16, 2012, for the proposed MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION and provide the following revised recommendations: General: 1. All recommendations and requirements indicated in the April 9, 2012, PUD and Site Plan review memorandum from Public Works are included by reference. 2. An easement vacation is required as part of this redevelopment. The formal vacation document must contain an easement vacation description and depiction exhibit signed by a professional surveyor. 3. The City has record of easement number 3211239 on file. The developer must confirm the status of this easement. If it has not already been vacated, it must be vacated as part of this development. 4. Proof of parking has been demonstrated; however,the proof of parking layout must be revised to demonstrate a more realistic parking lot plan if it were needed to be built. 5. The easterly access for 691n Avenue must be aligned with the parking lot drive aisle. 6. The measured snapshot of parking reported was 90 vehicles during a routine shift change period under the existing site scenario. The parking study identified that the ITE parking demand numbers provide a better representation of the existing parking needs than do the City's requirements; however,the ITE projected demand is only 61. Therefore,the ITE projections in this scenario are significantly underestimated and should not be relied upon to base parking needs for this sight. If deviations from City ordinance are considered, the required parking should be based on actual studies and should include a factor of safety for those periods and events that might exceed the everyday normal situation. At a minimum without further information and without viable alternatives to overflow parking, I recommend constructing the proposed Phase I parking (104 parking stalls) plus an additional 28 stalls that could be constructed in the proof of parking areas in the northwest area and in the northeast area.Additionally, if issues were to develop anytime in the future, the developer would be required to construct the full amount of required parking stalls. 7. Provide connections of internal sidewalks to public regional trail/sidewalk along 69`n Avenue. 8. Preserve or replace sidewalk on the northwest side of the existing 64 unit facility if the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat Review Memo— Maranatha 2nd Addition Page 2 May 25, 2012 proposed proof of parking area is implemented. This may require a reduced number of proposed parking spots available in this area. Preliminary Plat: 9. Show the total acreage on the plat. 10. Show the name and address of the subdivider. 11. Show the existing zoning on the site. 12. Show any proposed zoning changes. 13. Show the plat adjoining the west property line. Final Plat: 14. Provide a working drawing of the final plat with all proposed easements that includes an overlay of all ponds, all utilities(private and public, proposed and existing) and grading elevations for the City to use to verify adequacy. The drainage easements must encompass the ponds, overflow areas, and channels at or above the determined individual 100-yr flood elevations for those elements and areas. Prior to Issuance of Land Alteration and Building Permits: 15. Submit a recorded copy of the restrictive covenants (subdivision agreement). 16. Submit final site plans and specifications for review and approval by the City Engineer in form and format as determined by the City. The final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan. 17. Submit a letter of credit or cash escrow for the land disturbance portion of the project in the amount of 150%of the estimated cost or in the amount determined by City staff to comply with the land alteration permit, site improvements and to restore the site.The developer may submit one itemized letter of credit, if approved by City staff.The City will not release or reduce the letter of credit or cash escrow until work has been completed according to the final site plans approved by the City. 18. A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions, traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions,tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility provisions,temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non- compliance provisions. The plan must be in a City approved format and must outline minimum site management practices and penalties for non-compliance. 19. Submit a$5,000 separate cash escrow for the construction management plan elements as part of the non-compliance provision. This escrow must be accompanied by the agreement and signed by the developer and property owner. Through this document,the developer and property owner will acknowledge: a. The property will be brought into compliance within 24 hours of notification of a violation of the construction management plan, other conditions of approval or City code standards. b. If compliance is not achieved, the City will use any or all of the escrow dollars to correct any deficiency and/or issue. 20. Schedule and hold a preconstruction meeting with the City staff. Preliminary Plat and Final Plat Review Memo— Maranatha 2nd Addition Page 3 May 25, 2012 All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. The preliminary plan (site plan and preliminary plat) and final plat must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions above. Subsequent approval of the final plat may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading, geometric design and other design elements as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. MEMORANDUM DATE: April 9, 2012 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Steven L. Lillehaug, City Engineer/Director of Public Works Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor SUBJECT: Maranatha Skilled Care Center PUD and Site Plan Review—Public Works Public Works Department staff reviewed the Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Site Plan submittal dated March 19, 2012, for the proposed Maranatha Skilled Care Center and has the following comments: Submittal package: 1. All comments that follow are made with the assumption that this development process will eventually proceed through the subdivision process and combine the site's two parcels into a single parcel. It is anticipated that a preliminary plat and a final plat would be evaluated and approved by the City and County prior to proceeding with an issuance of any permits for any actual construction work. Proposed property lines, easements, setbacks, etc. have not been fully evaluated for these reasons;therefore,the full evaluation of these elements will take place once the preliminary plat and final plat are developed and formally submitted to the City for consideration. 2. A lighting plan is required to be submitted as part of this application and review of the PUD and Site Plan (Ordinance 35-355). This must be provided for evaluation. 3. A site plan is required to be submitted as part of this application and review of the PUD and Site Plan (Ordinance 35-355)that includes proper dimensioning of drive aisles, parking stalls, curve radii, and other typical site plan dimensioning. This must be provided for evaluation. 4. A drainage plan is required to be submitted as part of this application and review of the PUD and Site Plan(Ordinance 35-355). This plan must include all storm drainage hydraulic and hydrology calculations for the site including piping on-site/off-site, infiltration calculations, detailed design and construction plans for all storm water utilities and treatment facilities, detailed pond and infiltration basin cross sections, storm water facility planting plans, etc. Provide geotechnical soil parameters and soil infiltration rates for soils located in the immediate area of any proposed infiltration basin. These items must be provided for evaluation. 5. Provide the City with a traffic impact and parking study for the site. Required elements of the study must be discussed with the City Engineer prior to performing the study. 6. In accordance with Ordinance 35-2150.2.a,the lowest floor elevation including the basement floor must be at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation, which is estimated to be 859.5 feet. The proposed building lowest floor elevation is shown at 852.88 feet—this must be raised 6.62 feet to 859.5. Preliminary Plan Review Memo — Maranatha Center Page 2 of 5 April 9, 2012 Easements, Agreements and Plat: 7. Legal descriptions and easement vacation documents must be obtained for all existing easements. Existing public easements as determined by the City must be vacated and proposed easements must be dedicated as part of the preliminary and final platting process. 8. An updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Engineer and City Attorney for review at the time of the preliminary plat application (within 30 days of preliminary plat application). Additionally, this will need to stay current and be updated through the approval process as required to maintain and be current within 30 days of release of the final plat. 9. A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions,traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions, tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility provisions, temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non- compliance provisions. A $5,000 deposit will be required as part of the non-compliance provision. 10. A Subdivision Agreement is required that includes all conditions of the project approval, subject to the final site plan approval by the City Engineer. 11. An overall easement agreement is required that will provide the City perpetual accessibility to all private utilities and storm drainage areas to inspect and enforce proper utility service and maintenance for the entire site. This easement agreement also includes private inspection, maintenance and reporting responsibilities and must be executed prior to issuance of building and land alteration permits. 12. A 10-ft drainage and utility easement must be dedicated on the plat around the entire perimeter of the site. 13. A drainage and utility easement encompassing all storm water treatment facilities must be dedicated on the plat. 14. The applicant shall be responsible for coordinating site development plans with all private utility companies (Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, Qwest Communications, etc). Easements necessary to provide utility service to the proposed site development should be dedicated on the plat as necessary. 15. Private site appurtenances (e.g. light poles, signs, etc.) must not encroach on public easement areas. For appurtenances that provide adequate setback and will not have any direct impact on the public elements within the easement area as allowed and approved by the City will require an Encroachment Agreement. General Items: 16. The proposed plat is located adjacent to Hennepin County right-of-way. Minnesota Statutes require that the City submit the plat to Hennepin County Transportation for written comments and recommendations. All Hennepin County comments will be conditions of approval. 17. The civil plans must be certified by a licensed engineer in the state of Minnesota. 18. This development is required to be reviewed by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission. All City and Watershed storm drainage, treatment and infiltration standards are required to be met. Preliminary Plan Review Memo—Maranatha Center Page 3 of 5 April 9, 2012 19. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City of Brooklyn Center's standard specifications and details. The City's standard details must be included in the final site plans. 20. A general project phasing and sequencing plan must be provided for the development. 21. During construction of the site improvements and until the permanent turf and plantings are established, the developer will be required to reimburse the City for the administration and engineering inspection efforts. 22. Upon project completion, the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures, and provide certified record drawings for any associated private and/or public improvements prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 23. Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer's design/project engineer. Upon project completion, the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer's immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the state of Minnesota and must certify all required as- built drawings. 24. Provide irrigation for the entire site. Permittiniz: 25. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. 26. A City of Brooklyn Center sewer and water disconnect permit is required. 27. A City of Brooklyn Center land disturbance permit is required. 28. A MPCA NPDES permit is required. 29. A MPCA sanitary sewer permit may be required. 30. A Minnesota Department of Health department permit is required for the watermain extension. 31. A Hennepin County permit is required for work within Hennepin County right-of-way. 32. Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission(SCWMC) plan review and approval are required. 33. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warranted. Site Plan 34. The joint walking path/fire access plan must be approved by the fire chief. 35. The entire perimeter parking and drive aisle area must be constructed with B612 curb and gutter. 36. Designate appropriate design vehicle and provide vehicle turning movements for vehicles through the points of ingress/egress and throughout the site to/from delivery locations. 37. Provide concrete driveway aprons at access points to 69`h Avenue (use City standard details). Preliminary Plan Review Memo—Maranatha Center Page 4 of 5 April 9, 2012 Sheet C 1.0 38. Provide additional plans sheets as noted in the keyed notes contained and referenced in the plans. 39. The sanitary sewer and water lines must be disconnected and inspected before any building demolition starts. 40. All Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Best Management Practices(BMP) devices must be installed and inspected by the City prior to the start of any site work including demolition. 41. Remove the water meter and return the meter to the City before building demolition starts. 42. Remove the existing bituminous trail along 691h Avenue and replace with concrete walk. 43. Provide permanent storm water basin emergency overflow BMP devices. 44. Show watercourse for all storm water facilities and piping from origination to ultimate discharge location from the site. Sheet C2.0 45. Provide detailed plans for the proposed retaining wall on the west side of the building that include top and bottom wall elevations. 46. All drainage and erosion control BMPs must be incorporated into an all-encompassing SWPPP plan sheet. Sheet C3.0 47. Provide large note indicating "All proposed and existing utilities contained within this site are PRIVATE". 48. All utility connections to City utilities must be inspected by City staff. 49. Install new gate valves and Packaged Magnesium Anodes at all watermain connection points. 50. Hydrant location must be approved by the Fire Chief. 51. Provide watermain profile plans for watermain located adjacent to ponding areas. Further evaluation will be needed pertaining to the pond NWLs and the proposed watermain elevations. 52. The City recommends extending a proposed future watermain stub to a point outside of the limits of the proposed parking lot for future looping of the future building located in the southeast quadrant. 53. The sanitary sewer connection point to the public sewer located in 69th Avenue must be in an existing manhole. Connection into the existing sanitary sewer system as prescribed in Keyed Notes No. 1 will not be allowed via a WYE, but must be into an existing manhole. 54. Provide profile plan and connection details for proposed sanitary sewer segment within public right-of-way. 55. Use SDR 26 PVC for all sanitary sewer lines. 56. The City recommends extending a proposed future sanitary stub to a point outside of the limits of the proposed parking lot for future connection to the future building located in the southeast quadrant. 57. Provide culvert profile for culvert crossing easterly driveway. 58. Define NWLs and 100-year flood elevations of all storm water basins. 59. Provide plans and details for rooftop drainage. 60. Provide detailed channel plans and provisions that demonstrate and/or propose Preliminary Plan Review Memo—Maranatha Center Page 5 of 5 April 9, 2012 improvements to accommodate and/or enhance the drainage swale along the westerly property line to include the ultimate site discharge culvert. The plan must include properly designed watercourses from all treatment basins with properly designed permanent outlet BMPs. The design must ensure no negative storm water impacts are projected onto adjacent properties. 61. Operation and maintenance manuals are required to be provided for all proposed, permanent storm water treatment facilities. Sheet C4.0 62. Drainage area 4 must be treated prior to discharge from the site. 63. Provide detail for rock construction entrance. 64. Provide details for all SWPPP BMP devices. 65. Provide and list a SWPPP inspector/manager with contact information that must be available within 4-hrs notification to respond to and implement SWPPP related corrective measures. 66. All inlet protection devices must have overflow protection. 67. The developer must send digital(PDF) copies of required SWPPP inspection reports to the Engineering department within 12 hours of completion of the required inspection events. 68. A more detailed SWPPP is required that includes interim BMP devices and measures throughout the site including temporary sediment basins, etc. and designed to meet the MPCA NPDES permit requirements. 69. BMP provisions for a vehicle wash-off point must be incorporated into the plan and implemented should the City Engineer determine the necessity. 70. All SWPPP BMPs must be installed and inspected by the City prior to any disturbance of the property. 71. Silt fence must be installed around the entire perimeter of the site. 72. Street sweeping must occur as needed, on a daily basis and/or as directed by the City Engineer as warranted. 73. Show and label water course with flow arrows and label ultimate site discharge point(s). 74. Define and show an exclusive SWPPP containment boundary that identifies a sediment and erosion limit that must not be exceeded. If exceeded, all work will cease until corrective measures have been implemented and the issues have been remediated. Sheet L 1-1 75. Include permanent turf restoration plans for entire site. 76. Provide detailed storm water treatment basin planting plans. All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. The preliminary plan(site plan) must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions above. Subsequent approval of the preliminary plat, final plat and final site plans may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading, geometric design and needed easements as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. Hennepin County Transportation Department ' 1600 Prairie Drive 612-596-0300,Phone Medina,MN 55340-5421 763-478-4000,FAX 763-478-4030,TDD www.hennepin.us Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor May 22, 2012 City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 Re: Preliminary Plat Review-Maranantha 2n`' Addition Residential Care Facility 69th Avenue North(CSAH 130) at Unity Avenue Hennepin County Plat Review No. 3242 Dear Mr. Johnson: Minnesota Statutes 505.02, 505.03, and 462.358, Plats and Surveys, allow up to 30 days for county review of preliminary plats abutting county roads. This residential development was reviewed by the Plat Review Committee on May 1, 2012. It should be noted that 69h Avenue North (CSAH 130) is a collector street, and hence it has fewer significant concerns than a typical county minor arterial roadway. The road is on the county list of potential road turnbacks to the city for future discussion, and this has previously been acknowledged by city staff. Right-of-way-there is no additional right-of-way dedication requested on this roadway. Driveway access-no change in site access is being proposed. Traffic Impacts-this project is anticipated to have fairly minimal traffic impacts. Permits- Please inform the property owner(s) that all proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping / streetscaping. Permit questions can be directed to Carolyn Fackler at (612) 596-0336 or carolyn fackleKa-)co.hennepin.mn.us . Please contact Bob Byers at (612) 596-0354 or robert byers(&co.hennepin.mn.us for any further discussion of these items. Sincerely, James N. Grube, P.E. Director of Transportation and County Engineer TING/rqb cc: Plat Review Committee Mark Larson,I lennepin County Survey Office 69TH AVENUE NORTH .. .......... Ll lw C-7 z < a- z >/ >_ -.1-1 .. ........ _j --------------- 0 'Y 0 ------------ PARKING Of 101 STALLS C13 Ofi O L___ ILL 14 0 1: ICI 12 �2 EXISTING 64 UNIT 101 ASSISTED LIVING TO REMAIN III-4 4 F 7 L DE ::1 SERVICE . . . RAMP > ,d EN TOTAL PROOF:CF_ PARKING (87 STAL�s f FUTURE 2 1/2 STORY 38 UNIT I I - ) MEMORY INDEPENDENT 23 PARKING GARDEN FACILITY STALLS NEW 97 BED SKILLED NDERGROUND NURSING ARKING FOR 38 FACILITY-TCU LTC MC PROPOSED POND 23 32 DID L FIRE LANE FUTURE INDEPENDENT OPTION C Maranatha Skilled Care 0 • BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 5-16-2012 I COMM#72535-09066 Presbyterian homes & services I i i ill I 69TH AVENUE ORT 0 - I I -- II Y Iwl aIwi IWi Izl r-- Y ICI % y r-- O IQI `i PARKING j--- a IOI STALLS co Iml -- I I.L. ICI ,< ,2 ,2 U ICI EXISTING 64 UNIT 12 17 -- I I Ivl ASSISTED LIVING -- ' I TO REMAIN a I I L 16 ED I ❑� _ — � 1 I SERVICE RAMP I I .b E / \ / \ TOTAL PROOF OF < PARKING / \ \ / (87 STALL) _ I ' I I FUTURE 16'- I I -o -2 2 112 STORY 38 UNIT Ill . I I MEMORY I DEPENDENT 23 PARKING 'GARDEN FACILITY I r I I'l I I STALLS NEW 97 BED I I r®® SKILLED NURSING — r— -- FACILITY-TCU / -- I I LTC / MC — —I — r-- PROPOSED 27 POND I I I �-- I � I 1 GARAGE I 1 az I 1 I ' 1 I r�r7-r-1—T—r7-r-1—T—r r-r--r-r�-r- -T-r�-rte-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I � L _ - - - r- FIRE LANE _ I T_ � N • T _ MECH O UNIT on UNITA j _.-. _ I VEST , , _. F�.� V -•T -�t-NI J 4: ELM O I, UNITA I __ T r UNITA I UNRA UNITA, UNIT Ai UNR I. UNITC A IT!e:. a I-1.� OWING rVN1iA -_. SEATING �1 OATA �¢e � LY � 1W-1-1 � fl'I :_T: — I►_1'� UNITA UNIT AtI PROCESS CLEAN ELEC OFFICE I N LIVING b vim. LIFT U}'�� �I'- N CORRIDOR CORRIDOR O C N I ` OUN T A .-t' LIFT. UTILITY T - TRASH - -.- T r � � SPA CONF. ACTIVITY l ROOM CHEN O3F. OFFICE ELEC }..`l OFFICE LTC` ENTRY STOR. AID v H LOBBY uFr oR, HNATI ACTIVITY K NE I°O ENTRY AN ST IvING YINITA SOILED _- MECHROOM '" DISH rµ \n FLED m i Y IIT I ITV T 1)TA �' ROOM _ A fT I'll LEV �L� Er",0.EV C I CORR 'A iH y B N LIFT CORRIDOR CORRIDOR -i - REV U'1 m EOJ P CORR W TT p• fry Yip-' UNIT it / \ 4 � DRY STOR. DRY STOR. \ /� l ^( a - I a � 7 I � 1. L. RA i IT OING UNIT A KO �. f DINING Q) U TA 4 'I UNITA UNITA UNITA UNI NIT A UIT NC III i 4 OPEN G .a o DF, G OFFICE (SIT R MIT UNITA KITCHEN _...... CORK STAFF iiLOUNGE .GIN _ \\- CONF STORE ^ \ f�\ MED�, �\N7 . OR COR OFF�L'E \ \: ; OFFICE - ^NEST.'y ME �� COMM -L EL < �} CHAP \� Q rn to 1, r ON t B UNIT ¢, UNITA Ir1 DINING } UNITA 4 Y r UNITA T° UNRA Z UNITA r UNITA UNITA UNITA NITC TT I „ lr SICAL UNITA I� �lle'U� ,1 I. :��.,,; / - ROOF I PITY A r 1 y �_ _ TIIEN/1PY I UMTA r ELEC. Y �,h'l, II I} I4� uNRAt Ili t .L CORRIDOR �CORRMIOR Y j O o:'. l - RCN LIFT - �, '\.G r T J UNITA .... -T CLEAN ._ \ UTILITY ROOM - ._ 1 ELEC. ',l J•J Z �J� OFFICE CONE I r SPA _.. IQTCIEN �t JI ENTRY UUNORY yr STAIR — + LAUNDRY STOR �� lkNEN TA LOBBY SITTING T - _ _.� IG.. Z - { I.. .. ENTRY ... � H H II11 I . J MECH CONE I•� ROOM iI.J^ ELEC. I_ ✓ ROOM DISH - __ I , LIFT UNITA e UTILIty T 5TGR. I�'; (t00A1 r _ 1 _ n ^III �H�J .I:L.t� 'ELE\ i LEVIF ELE TT LIFT ,�� A S C V STAR� __— v n CORRIDOR 1T1 -I fJII ,� EPFFIH LIFT • l .(._i.I yf IIyY3 I �._ { ,,,..jjjjjj,,,,,, a G ,... UNITAt STOR. ' �... 'li9M' ... ,,FIT AN NN 'LL Toll 1 UNITA UNITA UNRA UNRA I UNITA UNIT A WING I}} UNRppC I(L LIM11A B UNITC UNITA ...cIA' _ �i?''4y •,�' ( •..1�L-i I LMrt nD�F l \ Z i - \ 2 � T IJ�N L UNITA UVITA UNITA UNITA UNITA UNITA UN ITC UNITAa -� DINING I -j I;HITA AROOM UNITA ROOM Ir �y9yy �(G� ACT O a •:,ELEC. :It �� �['_—I -I 1 T At ?i OFF MECH. CORRIDCR CORRIDOR _ 5 b { STIR 1 -- I^ "�__: __. • .._'� Sr--TI IFL T I' STOP O IINITn LIFT Ij CLEAN T. f ROOM IL. , ' I i -I - .\ :, UTILITY S A/ CONF ROOM J � -:.a r. FLFC. ., Jj I47 1 K. IptITCHEN OX OFFICE _ LTC 0 STAIR LAUNOHY -'-- ROOM ACT VITY ENTRY TRAl U - ACi1NTY K TCHEN H H STATION LOBBY LAUNDRY 91TTIN0 N "OR MEDS ELI. ENTRY ..._ - r-- -_- 'IT SOILED �JI MCCH LIVING DISH UNITA y UULUV � STOLE T ROCM _ - - �- ]II` ROM �;.�GE �.j '^I L-FT - Ax r AELEV.'.... LELEV OFF. 1 U 'y 1. ---- fPB _ A E gYA C STA R WORK LIFT 1_qq1 p� r � /I .,�; �I OFF OFF OFF UNIT D / ll I. �I,1�([. ( UNITA UNRA� UeL...II. A I _i ;- .1, 11'� I.C....� UNITA NITA UN— UNITA j� DINING UNIT J UNIT alk UNITA UNITA UNITA IT r-•�. C. � T 00000 ❑ ,❑J • C Z 0 N A\ 7� N 5 I Z < m O 'w i • m m CT p m m ITT ��1 . ■■ ■■■■ ■ 1 ■ 1 1 1 ■■ 1 1 1 .■ 1 ■ 1 ■ ■F■ 1 ,,m..� ■ ■� ■ ■i■ ■.■ ■;■ ■;■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■;■ ■■ ■■ ■■ "; -' : 1 ■.■ 1 �■ 1 ■■ ■. 1 1 '�-.�!�1 �� 1 ■■ 1 1 � 1 ■■ 1 ■■ ■■ 1 1 ■■ ■■ . , 1®1 �1 :' 1 1 ON 1 :� 1 :':: :: 1 i ::� 1IN1 : I .� ! i 1 � f 1 1 l 1 :': Is _11 � W Wo �- R 71 r EN 1 1 r �. � 1 ■■ 1 i1 ■■ ■ INS 11 11 ■ it ■ ! ■ 1 f.■ ■ ■■ ■;■ ■ ME s 13 ■ miss :': %: I :': v_Em 111 a00111 A R C H IT EC T S � ASPHALT SHINGLES VINYL SHAKE SIDING PREFIN. METAL FASCIA FIBER CEMENT TRIM FID h LM_ I[±1 11=1 El I { l� III 1_l0 1 I_� I i 1-�. f_�i_.� , . ! . 3 L. _ +_ 1�� L Ll . FACE BRICK ROCK FACE CMU VINYL HORIZONTAL SIDING FIBER CEMENT BOARD&BATTEN VINYL WINDOWS FACE BRICK WEST ELEVATION E . . � I t r � SOUTH ELEVATION r 9k7 A7. i EAST ELEVATION Maranatha Skilled Care �. BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA . preshyterian 4-5-2012 1 COMM#72535-090b6 homes & services Building Materials ID Sheet (Elevations are Not Accurate) F LANDSCAPE DETAILS: LANDSCAPE PLAN: De IAVIMCTtW IS RI PUNRRNIE",I AN �V Y R 11 T n ( n nx NNIAn PERIOD V 1 t C K [ [ [U M A UI l [ [ [ "(7(*r,,9 THL NEES ff*III,1111 IF NO IT OIL 71 1 A IT I Its TRUNK Of III BIF 711 IF III IT I IFDF-I INBORN I'I BID,ENTA, ✓rA t PM T I H W N U R R rllf YrN - �lE !5 5 R S 5 5 rUIU XI � • PR I NtL)11 TUN -_- DI �� uMr NORTH --' -- TT C 'S H v In. ___ _-- An I SCALE IN FEET -� TI✓II// //yj'/� N IX((. IH I T N NEIIIINIONNSTLE C1,1LI TllCI E. A N FR1 Y/-- - . xuxOB\kk,RRRIT Ill.I D N)rPNf uNNtl.AH I\uf 1Ul BFPk (lUfH,IXXA tl111X _ -__.1 REA -IHENTITIN 'UHAIUfRINFULIKENT-AR(TRrI IUIY II In ff _ _ --V WAIT I TRIPS DD D I IinN I I FIND;THI[T()RENnIN I RnN51 - - ---uNr-I WILD IN- / 1 1 PRIPE P AFTH)I III III OI I ' y li 12SS ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST.PAUL,MN ss ,. TRIEWRAP TO FIRST NMNCH I I IP EDGE OF IHH ' , K HAIL' 01 PN.IARDN4a-ssROo IAITTY FIA 111.1111 PIR WmI DN I I I FAX(ASD uv-IIOI ROOT rI,WT VSr I 1 , ABO\T GMD FVFNW mI DR I _ N IONTA( WITH. C5 Maranatha (I TWIT r ,�^ 2,ROOT B,IL VIUTI "I'Ll SUNNI 'HINIL'.. I ll%FlAR115..1nAN �* AA,�I,S 1 - -- - :o Skilled Care 1 I - 1 TT R f FIFAT --- _ 101 11 N ANTI) I - _-- T ORL CY T RRED TNISENL DST ,AREA - -- I 5401 69th Ave. N. M R RE51V I TREDIC PER( RRwLIII FANTNI-1. I Brooklyn Center, EB a WWNIDWTII\ DRdI�III„rJ""I, I - Minnesota 1 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL TREC PROTECTION ' ------ -- 1 ASSOCIATES I I ' Ill INNR\c NOR 111IM'DINILI BOR ' I ---- a, "T T L L[5C . [ 1 W [ T 6$OOTTESTED. T II E - I 1 RA.RETS U X N,ANN FUNAUGICT BRINCLOR, ALITH RR )I II 4 ,BLL vt I Y Y cAnUn I Q C� O"f '�I OF PL.MTNUk1 fl)PC 1 , JBE WAIII\ INE-11-1 IT �il1SA RVREAR IAN I / I v(N IOf - PER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: ( I -111 I rLvA I i JH / IN LIEU OF THE 6 REQUIRED 6 CALIPER INCH DECIDUOUS TREES,THE LANDSCAPE ' I WOOD IT �N ` ARCHITECT HAS PROPOSED 24-2.5 CALIPER INCH TREES.THESE SIZE TREES ARE .I HOOT Bau %. RI.. MORE READILY AVAILABLE FROM THE NURSERIES AND HAVE A BETTER CHANCE OF sc n 5 1 SURVIVAL AFTER THEY ARE PLANTED IN THE GROUND. I .; - RWTB.\ll5[i UVNWn'UEU SURGk,D[ - CONTMCTORSRESPONSRLIFVx vL TIINVPIR 5 ' / ✓. SGII'f -mkR / IMMIU ITT RnlNn' LS. yy A r [ , CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL AN r LI-1 xNI L.L. I h -. / ,�_•• .«„Y L.RnE1 (oA.LFrrN I.N 'I Y LOOSEN ROOTS OF,ILL LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE: I k - ♦♦ `"`�^'" I .mol ______ - CONTAINCRODPLANTS. - - A, FR R(I f R T()PIi.A SCARIFY BOTTOM AVD SIDES OF SYM QTY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE CONT COMMENTS , PROPOSED BWDaO - ♦` xv I I B'11IN. HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING "E St IRUBS TO BE VIA CEU 50 TITAI DECAUOUS TREES ' �L W4.30 i ; T(W(N C YNTAINFR SITS FLUSH g0 6 BICOLOR OAK Ouarcus 5cdor 2.5'CAL BBB SINGLE STEM R I WITH PROPOSE UCRAUL. NM 6 NORTH WOOD MAPLE Betu a n,g,a NOnhwootl' 2.5'CAL 5.5 SINGLE STEM --- MULCH-1'DC[P S(C SPEC AH i ll N. 4 RIVER BIRCH GINKIR Egra EP HUE 880 CLUMP I{ LANDSCAPE FABRI( SFE$PfC. n rl 1 $H 8 SKYLINE MONEVLOCUST Gledt 1 acanthos Ser.Inermis'Skycde' 2.5'CAL BA8 SINGLE STEM I Fe H �fIx,ING ANTFRIAL $Ff$PE[. , 1}ryM1{t d f CUGE VARIES-REFER TO PL IN EVERGREEN TREES F AP 5 AUSTRIAN PINE Pr%q rNig 6 MGT B&B FULL FORM L 1 -- EC I IT EASTERN RED CEDAR jkRHqLms Igirema 5'HGT B&B FULL FORM yf _ I ( ---- PLANTING"(-511 SPEC. SP 1 6 BLACK HIL SSPRUCE Pcm glauca ReNesta BHGT B68 BUILDING WAII ITVP) DECIDUOUS SHRUBS AC 14 AUTUMN MAGIC CHOKEBERRY Aroma meta Autumn M INi I nl'Ie � area' agic 21'HGT POT PUNd'O-G- SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL AH 24 ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA Hydrangea arEOfescens AnN)aDella' 24'HGT POT PUW4'O.G ,Iryry11 AW 8 ANTHONVWATEREItSPNEA SPIse.-altla'AnthmNyWalerBf 24-HGT POT PLAN14'O.C- I LANDSCAPE B-1 14 BUTIERFLYBU5H DierMlla sess,INSia'0utleAy' 24-HUT POT PLAN d'O.C. , 14(` �-j A CD 30 CARDINAL DOGWOOD Comussericea'Cardnal' 24-HGT POT PLAfNTTO-O.C. T' PLAN LS 6 LfTTLE PRINCESS SPIREA Spreajaporica tiNle PIII-S 24'HOT POT PLANTTO.C. ' P A AW ITTV VARIES WV 2g WENTWORIHVIBURNOM VDUrnum triloNUm WanPNONh 26'HGT POT PLAN 10'O.C. I % �,. 511.1�L;S AIULCH.SEE WECS. I y NA 1 3'DEPTH CONIFEROUS SHRUBS I V ' 1-and P.- [DG[R 5C[I'LL' 9 BLUE CHIP JUNIPER J p fanzontdrs Flue Chip' itr SPRD POT PLANT 5'O.C. I I G o0 1 Ff GF\ARIES-SFE PLAY BN 18 BIRD'S NEST SPRUCE P' eD 'Hidbrmis' 10-SPRD POT PLAN 5'O.C. I ' Ar I SCHEMATIC DESIGN 10/05/10 -_N_ ` SG I6 SEA GREEN JUNIPER Jun'p s hlnen515 Sea Greek IB-SPRD POT PLANT 4'O.C. ♦ CITY 8 STATE SUBMITTAL 03/23/12 tt 22 TAUNTON YEW T eCla Taunton' IW SPRD POT PLANT4'O.C. 1!'DEPTH T.NIIVI.LOi\t DY 5 DWARF BRIGN GOLD YEW TaxLn cuspitlata TAVaR Bright GdQ 38'HGT POT PLAN 6'O.G. ♦ 1 , PERMIT SUBMITTAL 04/10/12 PIANTING SOIL-$EE WECS. i PERENNIALS TI vrn 1 _.- LIN)SENRWTS DF �_________________ VLWANTINGIALVRI(Nt BS 46 BLACKENED 5115AN HL,st cba blgl1la'Gdtlstumi 1GAL POT PLANETO.C. �H,nrlR welT.,nn1 --_�Hf exl� TO PL ANTI\G J1 16 JUNE HOSTA Hosta'JUne' 1GAL POT PLAN 3'O C. ovr.Nl KG 15 KARL FOERSTER GRASS Calamagrostis acLMROra I BN Fo ble 1 GAL POT PLANT2'O.C. -- r NA 30 PURPLE DOME ASTER AalerA'Purple Dome' iGAL POT PLANT 2'O.C. _ uTO PS 26 PURPLE EMPEROR SEDUM Swum Purple Emperor' 1 GAL POT PLAN 2'O.C. AL PL/�NTNG 50 55 STELLA D'ORO DAYLILV Hemeracallsx Stdla00ro tOT POT PLAN 2'OC III WS 17 WHITE SWAN CONEFLOWER Ech nacea uryurea White Swan' 1GAL POT PLANT 2'OC GENERAL NOTES LANDtifAPF INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR STILL'.T SITE PRIOR TO SUBANTINL,BID. ITS HIL SPILT NOT AND BCO'B I AAILAR C(%)RDIN,ATE TIE PHASf50f CUNSTRL(TIOVA\D IT-TIN( O\IFEROLS TREE PRE\N)USLY KtINFD FOH(:I IKSTILIS TREf LLPLANTIVG.\NEASRf(EI\INGCROUNDCUIFRKRFNNI.\LS, TONSJTF VANE STRIPS TO HAVE DUCER A\D NIL.UHAY )\TRA(TORSFIALLIUXnITA\INITTIR .FSTFIW THE OAVNER THE IIANECkOUN111f.\LTIAWf TO, N. E FVl S O WITII C%NTH(:COHUIr1O\S RCLATI\GTO TIN;NATURC AND SI HI'I(N W(NtK. I\STALLATIONIVITTt OTIIFRCOVTHARIMS\VUNKINUOV NTF. - ESSTIALL HOTBE LSED.ALL 1.1.11RULS UI STN.I BE HULL VNUALS,WD/OR LINES SINLI HFCEI E A AIINRSU OF IrDEPTH SPFC IF IEOINDICATD ONDIfAWLNGORIVIPIRAFRATION. (PTANCE NSPFRR)VUf AULAVDE(AP1\NDNTE \'[RIIY LAYOUT ANUAVY DIM[vSIOVS NION'\A\D BRIVC TD II IF.iTT1vTM)V Of TIT[LANUSC,'IY FORnI.NAR)HAL If THE SPECIES.WITHOUT PRLNIVC. OFPLINTH;S(N.C(HHSISTING OE AT LEAST n5 PARR TOPSOIL,BS IMPROVEMENTS. ;ICISODUIV(:ISGE\(RALLY\CCfPTABIFHRIANNADUT NS. NO PLA\TNG WILL BF IVSTAH.FD UNTIL COMPLETE;RADING AND PARTS PL AT OR nN\URC AVD In 11T55AVD. VFNIO fXI5TIVGPROPOSID TRRIGATgN S\STMI ANOUT AND OVE.STICHE F,,H IFfDI\;FRONNADGL!IT I S-SIPTEIIBERI;; ARCUFrTANIDISC REP,\NCIESWHKill,%YCOA IPROAIIS[THEDFSI.N.\NDORIVTFNTl*Tt1EPR)KI:TS (E)AITRUCTI(XHASBEf\COPLETEDINTIIEMFDIATE,\RE,\. PI IN UIRTI PRFCi111-F CANER PLANT SCHFDLtf F DSCREPABSHIS CONFIRM(OnIPLfIf LNNTS Of IRRIGATON PRK*TO APPLYING O\TRAI TOR IS RESPO\SIRLE F(*(NAA)IN(I4\I\T[VIFFOHAILDORNA\TSEEDIV(.INHN FALL.5F)ALL\OTI-RPHK)RTO IIIOIIT. IN QUANTITIES ESIST-SPE(.IFICATIOIA TAKE PRECEDENCE UNER ALL PLANTS TO NE 11-11,FD AS PER-STING,DCCMLS_ SHOP UMWIT31 NEWLY INSTALLED AL\TERLALS UNTIL TIMF(N OWVR n((IPTAV(E. O\'EAmlR 1,PLAVTIN;OI Ti51OF THESE DATES IS NOr W'IIERf SOO/fFfU All-VAVEU SLRFACEf.F1\ISIBL)I:RADE OF NOTES. ACTST I.\VDALISn1ON DAn4\Cf\N11OF.INV OCCUR PRIOR RFCfMV.IfNDfD.AV\.\DII.STMENT MUST pE,\PPFUVFDIN WRrtIN(: ASSUR[(HINRA-11THA.LAPP-CABLECODES,\NDRE;ILTIONI(A)IENNVCiIFI\ORLUR ()AfIDSIAIB IELDNBEIOl45UNACFHFI,\TIDVOFTR AIL ITAT1HL\r S.-Hr(CHRUG,TCO PNCPIR\G N" 4VOSl APElOV1M(iOR S1uH BF RESR NtiIPLFHN[PRO\ID\I: L RI THI RFSPHISINTLITY OF THE I THE L\VDSCAPF ARf"III-T NTfRL\IS SLflPLIfD SCAR.(:UNB.FTC.I LL PROPOSED PL\YTS 51Ntl RF Lt%�AIED AND STAKFIJ,\5 -kF IR 1N I.ILII R TH.,N M(r BEE HE PROTECT[DCN1 AV IRRIGAi UV LAYOUT PLAN AND SPELLER ATU\AS A PART OF TIII CO\TRA<T'E CCO TRA(NUR SHALL PkOVInf TOF OYV\FR%VDIIA Lads ReiNM 12075 l VNONPN.\v.LA1DfCAPE ARCHTFITMUSTAPPROVEALI QU.\I.iIH NAT1 PROUIIII P.NERALANUFA(TLHIDTOk S(OP(OFNORNWH[NRIDON(.ITE5[MEALL9(APPIL-FDRI NCEPRO(N.INN NCLIIDIVI.RIR VDT\Etf54\HILY CONIFFROlISP1A\TN(A HFkOM.\L(Ar.i l-- TUR[HN CONTRAI'TUR STIALL PROTECT All EXISTING ROADS,Cl1RBS';LITTERS,TMILS.TkfES.LAWNS ANUSITf SFIDIILANEASDISTURBEDDLETOGMDI N;OTIIERTIIANTIH)SE SEAKIIw:NPA\T NATFR,IL PNION TD,I\Y.\ND ALL DNG;\l:. THIS PC HPOS[\\Iknl,All DI(IDIrOLSTRC[5 PL\MfDI\TH[Mll. LIn11TfU lU.PRU\IVL F[RTI I" ILO\AN))ISA ST.RELY . AND FALL DEIIDLOI T I .NTT. c.-RN 72535-09066 fLEAIEViI DURIIC PLANTINGO PFMTIONS.ANY MSIAGE TO SANE SHALL RE REPAIRED AT NO COST TU THE I TtIE LANUS(:.AVf ARCIIT[LT PRIOR TU ONOLkAVUA)N lZA II.FSET'f. L ) OW'NfN. AREAS NOTfD TO RECOVE SOD-SEED STNLL BE INSTALLED AND H I)R iO N..,,NO NI I'I AI.I WHAPPINL AFTER 5-I. N5TALLATIOI.IT SNNLL BE TILE LAIDICAPE CONTRACTOR% ?'f HER .PI NT T.I I T E F I I TH IS\IT\II NIi NI L� TIII TIED AS PER INDUT SPECS. A%TnNTERALSUBSTTUTIONS\VILLBF,\I EPTEDONLESS NISPONf HII.II OlINUNI IHA HN SL)DH Or511N )(()NIRA(TUN SQUALL GUAX.AVIC[NC1YPn\T INRRIAT NNFNOED. InOh STM(\TIN AP WERN TJF R -Rilj:f'TFD 1T fl. H.f.Pi H"IIII HV TINE ,fOt,IU i1)HFI.SID T()f t)\THIN SHNUflS.MkI VNI.\l\ AREAS ARE INN GATfD PkI)PFRIt.VCIIUNO'HIUH ANFAS DIRF(1T01111(AT ISTIR IIIRIROII THE),TFOI II\\'NfR A«TI'TAN(E. H PIITIE.AVDII FF ART INTITI ONTRAITORIH L RI F T U TI: F L U.H ,HADt )U:ILLUFSICVATEDAHFAS DSTI.RBEUDIET. N ONI-.11)11 )k PNI)k TOi1ESL O \A TA I ),N T ))IT NUA H:S SOI VI)I.Afl IJ NNl L.NII55 vOTID \NUUNDA 6ITTIVC6u LUINLII)LNU.4T11\. CNa1l4IY PAK UTII TIES AVD PRO II E T f :.F>SARV PROTECTION FUR SAIIL BEFORE UB ( L TALL H(LAD PARALLEL TO THE(OIITOURS AND S TALL 111\'F A VU,OR VUOITATI()(TI FSAAAH1 I TI ION[ UH GROW'N(IFASfry I-AN)SGI, PRO Tf T. 1A 1DI IF: f N.I I1\DI RGROINU UTILITES SHALL BE LAD 50 THAT TRENCHES DONOT(ITTHROICHRI)I.SI'STf IIS OF TI;CFREDPOINTS.ONSLOPESETEEPERTHAN"4 ONNDM\AHf iTIE LANDSCNO[ iAC O\IUE TIEOWNfR WITII A AIATENALS SHALL BECNUN TILE UATf I)I AL I EPTANCf BY THE v(.JAKSAkf D,AIAITOV R.,ABOrI'F I),Bf L, ANY EXISTING TREES TO RENNIN. MA ALES,THE SOD SHALL BE STALETTOTHE GNOIIVD. ADIUSTME\TSNLOCITNO\OF PROPOSED PLANT NATENALS ANY ALLSHRLH BEDAS -S TURECEIE A DUPSHREDDED W,\TrRNCI,\IV\ (i HDUN(APPROPRIATE TO TINE ANDSCAPE ARCIETERAFTFR TIN I O\IHFTONOF PLANTNGOI GR- DI.TIE ROT: Tf AIP E F(:T1II(1 .NN1.PAINT 3�F f (CEDIN HELD.SHOUT.D ANADIUSTM[NT BI ADVNS[U.THE INRDWOHN IBLI.1 AVD FIRER N-W'EED BARRIER. PROTECT SITE COVDT-AIND(TO PLA\T.SUTIRIAL GROWTH ANINCA I n1ATERIALS.-PARTIAL AT(FPTAVCEWTLL Bf OLLD BEAPPf.)i-IFDATFLY\FT. ILVD!NI;.0)AHS ARf EYISTNCfONTOURS TRAILt IE(ET,ITOV,CLRK'GITTER,ANOT1IrRF Si -F NTSBASEDLP)V ALL PLANT MATERAL SHALL COANPA WITH TILE LATEST EUTION OE LA.IDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST RE\1OTIOrD, REQUIREMENTS. (. SIDFRFD. NOT TO HE PRLAII.NF FI H A, P- if ITrIF : EIL IWFORAIATIO.N SLPPLED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ITS OTHERS(ONT TOR. UUFAA1I AND AIN TIII A\1FHTCA\STANDARD FOR NURSERY ST(KK AILERKAV LLTREFI TO EI!! LEEP:HkfDDED T IARDWOODANULCH -AND BILLY NOLF .,NDIC,,F AR(I RTFIT IF THEIE DATES ARE. DISCROOSKIFS PRIOR TO CO\STRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPIAR(.1(TO!AMf. I HIT DLOSIO UBS SUALLE IF 3(ANF1 ATITE IN P.AVEDB OTHEIFRTII.ONED PONISRIIIXE 11 WTINO MLLLHLV DNFCi('ONTACT\VITIITREE TRUNK. LANDSCAPE IN THE P\TMCTOR. [ASOEL EDOR PIONSIOR AN' EIST ALEIDSILiUMOVF1IFOI ALl N VUSCAP[ LNA\OID,ABLf. DEI DI,UUSSIUtUHS SHALLINE E- ANTILLIDA \l ITN THEEDB E E -T ERA PPNOVfDFERTILIZER MIX[DN OTHERS DEFICIENCIES INDIEON,OHELECLGH S.ECALITTIRAOVS ORAV\' NINS FIINPRO\Enlf\RSUPIIIPROIE HDON Of AN ALIGNMf\TAIR DL. )SEDWALK5.TRAILSAHD'Ok NUII INSADTOITINRTO TREE IPF.f If 1iD 61MUB HHUIT.ORWALf\TNL TNfESS NLL THAT vU\ SOIL PfR iH[ANVII(At"TLRCRV NVLAL A\Di[RFN\IALPLANT)NI:REDS TORECENf)'DEEP OTIIfRSITf COVDiIO\N'HKHMCHTVC T' NSTEI,(T ON VSTALLAIO\AN)PN UN iU PROTECT LINOSC;APFIUNIN,\'iINI STAR: _ T 1 1 ADIUSTnNF VT NF UNED iUC UVFOMNTO)lINAI ZED NPOGMPTIC COVDrt ONS AND TU.A)IVI.NIZE THE[ L E NE)STBRIN PtAVT A IFPT NCf LL H Ll 1 V NTH'HEIT HIL.STREEGI\BMNCHVCNOLO\VNk t., NSTRL IDITN T 'Bf TRI T[DFON S(;RN[NAVOI\LL N)RfDDfD INRON(%)D Ml4(M W'RH NU NEED BARRIER. ESTICIEN TES TO THEAT•ALORGUA THE LA D NLSTBRINf.THT - ALLOW FILL:\VDPERDI(TIONEITAI \E B_NCTHFBOIL ISAI NEMU\AI AND URAO V(.-Arvv CHAV;E IV ALIf:VMf\1 MUST Bf APPNOI[D BI LAHDYAPE,ANCTBTER. RROA'fRf%>LOLLSDELTUA\D PULLEI'ARD T1DI.A ll flF(.IN ONW'HHA\ER TIFF TIDOTC,XAVULARNI.tU..001 PRIOREOPROOTHEATTfNOU BISr1ALICAU I.ANY ANCINTff_T AOO\v fOR PRT WfN DR.\I\AGE Ai AVD AROLND THH BI.!NDI\C. RN,\\(IIIVI:\UI NUFR THA\b'4BO\EH\ISr1iD IACALN.. \fNTHU N3.5'CAIIMk PIR(IF 1AVDI,THE RIL-1-SPIRLI SPRISTAN NEONFI'RE E.\11N;EDNHIOAN IIE�VHALL11 LUAU YRN)R ILO PROCUNEARNI.IrvgINf IVSL\LL\IIOV. l/NI\I"A1TIDOTHFRWRF THI A11)IT 1:IN'I D.AT ES ION IISI: SITF. V,LL,\PPUC.\TIO\U11nIII.10IMF FOLIINNIVf.SPNIV(: PERPMVUf 4ClUHf>NEI UnWNEVDATIOVSU\OfR ALL MULOIfD PANIMA([RL\!IHSIAIIAIN)\nVU II,xSUU PI A(fINI VI ISIkUAt L v FH[TRFF IIUCIR AREAS J ------- ------- ELECTRICAL ----- - - ---- - - - ssrH A - 69TH AVENUE NORTH SYMBOL SCHEDULE .-_------- - ------- ►�^ E Two z O <:n:,u n 1os a y Yom,Ana.�• o I B __---�-- W4 9 o � � NPNXr.N•rA 11 ---'"y., I I _ N c° __ lei Ig aM.WMmR 1 -- \�--� — \ I ma m_m,W Q IZI 1� 0"-0 RWwF wAR ge ALAN I --- Q- IVI INSTALL SITE LIGH1N, — X10,11 r.nM SNRM I t---- Z PROVIDED BY IZI y� OORDINATE F-- Ie If TION WITH 51 LOr wan uM ® '"g Y J � LILTING PRO IH „O O MN PARKING fY I OI M STALLS 1 _, Ir �' �p w wReaw eRwr 1 \ LL DD i B L - $ L.wLmaFmA ® r.1W.,w,wlw I I I �- \ \ O ILLI $ R.N R.w_a. p• ANn R�waw 1 _� 1 ;9 1 \ } IOI "� O 1\ `, h } ,x EXISTING 64 UNIT �;-� U ICI EXISTING 64 UNIT 4 -- s -gym^- '••�°^° I\ INDEPENDENT Jul ASSISTED LIVING r-- # TO REMAIN -- 1 � LIVING TO REMAIN `�_ I 11 \ l �-- — XL w IZ ljj 1 I I� non mRU 881881E IZ W I �l � SED M I 4y RaRnN Deo. ow x.w w } zl III I I I nER�' EOI ,y .DO RAMP iy I Ii arm ,..�.., pa P�wF s,IQ Y I Y I °° DO i © .am mn.cv ©O, mr n,..D,YI O Ole 1 / 1 I O O \ / raBeL Dlw x.aW,R m w 10 RN__ m SIIOSLY O.•. m 1 .Q \/ � a�,.�..,° DNA w.RM LL 1 I I 1 \ / (� . I I �. < 4 Q ILL I I �_� I \ \ / -- wNR,ADC maF NYm ¢• NM.aA,w } OI' I�I \� i •d E i i / \ / \ TOTAL PROF OF I j \,��— __fJ �, ) I IExaTwc N1 I NT PARKING Z w�.o..s,aN. lip PYR IXar U ' ♦ \ �____ i ix°EOwsia D s / \\\ / (87 STAL�Sj_ JQ 9 Ilro Ktt"CU / \/ MNn.NAt MnD,mr .[�. wsm n•,s 1 , I DFIPOAm M \ \ r-- ® wmrNXC wnv mr 4° mL uR fr.NM I II :1 I PH.3A. I / --- — I p wms.n 13, a @RA we sa,Nw 1 I I i===, � I I-_ B UJ a)FUTURE 2 1/2 STORY �— I r-- ' ___+___ ___,___ 1 38 UNIT ' 1 INDEPENDENT o I --1 --- ---1--- �, 'w D FACILITY ___+--_ 2 PPARKING STALLS NEW 97 BED SKILLED r RMMN.mNNa l --+--- ---+--- NURSING -- _ I , FACILITY-TCU/ LTC/MC — — m°^.°°a PROPOSED i U BB POND 1 ° FWaN cueAEE TO E t1M0 ® •Pq wwlw I � .nEPENOANr U1W1O wRLBMn � Q I ' , GppAC{ r-- BB --- - I R- 4 `-- 0 ==M I f-'r 7-r-I—T-r7-r1-T-r7- T-r7-r-l-T-r7 F-I-1 s FIRE LANE BB AND NOLS MS NN.SMALL BE b•IN INSTALL OMER PIT M.", LEREr '- -� _—�---_ — - -- ��—_ —————————————_'— 7Z a U B AREAS AND 1R w1H OWYFR PRNw TO RWGM-IN. _ .._.A.-��� PN LDPIDIAT NITH w,SLED POS — �� ELECTR C -�LzK —_- — —— — —J Q LL I �n �1 ELECTRICAL SITE DEMOLITION PLAN \ = b0'-0- • GENERAL ELECTRICAL SITE NOTES QSPECIFIC ELECTRICAL SITE NOTES ___ —MnuE Nw-swxuR aDUT I'= 3p'-p' I/3•ws DFG CHAYfER A.Slrz lYW1N1G Br OINERi f90XOwntE INSTALLATNIN wN ,. SNN TRANSfNdfYER. PRDNDE YCp1GErz�PAD AND[OMxT DTHFRS SR1B OUTS. STALL PER L OULICLENTS C \/ r� ANCNOf B0.T5]/N'w4•WG. B. —1—­ARE---0N_1 PRONDE 2 PRONDE—.A.A•—IT PROP—P DrE BAIX[M)ARO L ico 0 CONDUCTORS NM . AND CA 11—ARD TO PROPER UNE. FIIRAIED CRAVE C. OBTAM POKER FROM PANEL LPAIT.UNLESS NOTED ORIERAISE. ] PRONDE] nD 0AMRDC CFNERATOEFV�ARfER. BADE •C N• STI18 LP 1MROUW FDUNDATON,EXTEND t0[HANGER AND c B f VERTICAL RDOS AIDE FINAL CORECR NA FLE CONDUIT. n• A PROAO 13D NE'A,T,b ALP CONNECTION TO WATER.NCXET �]/A•RDD C0101.1T HEATER. PRONOE]/A'C.3/n UNDERGROUND 1D OxERATOt AS OLT,STUB UP TMOUGII FOUNDATION,EXTEND TO HEATER Tp PVL COHOIIT ' 3A•MINIMUM AND YAXE MAL CONECTIONS NA fI2DBLE CONDUIT. W lY>c HORR01TAl RES CONE E• —]/A•PN:CONDUT S PRONDE 3/4-C.2110 3UNIX DRO01D TO GENERAT0t�55EYBLY. IIL �A�PID C—TE AT 3B DAYB / ANB UP 1NRWGH FOUNDATION.A EXTEND FLEA 10 CO1TR0 PANEL -- „ AND PANE RNA_CONNECTIONS NA REDME CONDUIT. i A PRONTO PANEL rz 1'EACH A PNC CON DUIT FROM DULLDIND TO COLIPIEIE ASSEMBLY SMALL BC B CON1R0 PANEL FOR EACH AUTONA,I[OANSFER SwTCN.EMP �M RArzp fOR top YPH WIND IAAD ON O PANEL ADDITIONAL t'MOTE NML OATOR iRON BUROwG ro 1/3•x B'-o•CRDIMD Roo I FOR roTAL EP.A.RNPOSEO. ROLM U PANEL FOR REMOTE R AMNIA BLY. U BAseI NuN]er RWiE UNFOUNDA FOUNDATION,RI GENERATOR ASSEMBLY,L A UP 111RDUGI1 fDUNDATON,EXrzND 10 LON1R0 PANEL AND YAKf NAL CONNECTIONS NA fLEXIBLE CONDMT. ,. RRONIRE]/A•PIDDIIIT R CATS SEDURIIY. NEREY E1.1 ,3 POLE BASE DETAIL 3 KNUCKLE MOUNT REOUIRCONNC PN T ro RDUG1tiIN. n uAXE couufrnoN TO YGN. NERYV LaA,XM wiH ARCHIrzcT NO SCALE NO SCALE s. APPROXIYA L TIOrN DF MARN ELECTRICAL ROOM. 10 APPNOXIYATE­TON Of MAw TELE/DATA RODY. .0 .0 j m > > 1 1 4 > > t A sal gig ;ij ........... ....................... /7 C, Y. 70 6, D Y/ 7-7 77 777 F-7 jj- 7 -7777 7- F A �33 17, -34 O 0 ........... n cry .............. .......... Pgojtcr No. UM201801 I HXR CKRTIFY THAT M9 PLAN. mm 03_23-12 SPLVQMK a�Rf TAS pw�ry MARANATHA JlA X1.OR Mki W DMCT�QN, AND�T I AM A DULY UMSED SAN ELECTRICAL SITE CHMED Mff mnmoNa MCIRM UNDU nm RMMON& un w no"ATS w SKILLED CARE PHOTOMETRC CALCULAT10N PLAN 'll X, MM GTURL 540169TH AVE.N. BROOKLYN CENTER,MN mhos 1M F -- -. - l PROPOSED BREWIATl0lS N BM EE 1*11,BRFw A. "DRERTF UI p P� ---------- E.l.- F_1. M`C- REMOVAL ..........- COlCIETE 1E.0- 69TH A VENUE NORT_H� AIAI.-VAL 30' 15 0 30' 60' IPIROIIIATE5 DISTURBED AREA REU­ IS s.as ACRES POPE ASSOCIATES INC SCALE 1 30' S I-ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST.PAUAMN 5510-14 WO.... X FAX Ell-RECER 10 DETMI.I/Cl D MARANATHA 2 A x ­ x x RE. U.1,-10­.1 O-TIO DIE.1. .1 All T I SKILLED CARE 1 LITTER I'ETI 111Ir T.1 11 1,11E I S­SAA1U1 AAD FANOVE CUIS AT-IT­1 CUAR _V AEFAIIIE1..Il.­­T-1 xL REAU., I- "Ill .I Ul,"c.pAA­ I U, OF IT_ BROOKLYN 11 A=Al I=`, ID A. _UY,I.""ll- 11 IlE E1­TI 1D.l 1­11 FY­ OFFIIIll 1- .1.-1- 7 "' 4117M.771_1 I'D CENTER. MN �MDVE­1 SEAEl SERICE 1 1- X :­�:TATER SERVFE­15.W VALVFS I—ETIMITI TO!HE Ex FOLLOW ALL Of W­CENTER SIMIARDS All E_ a 5 REVOd FREE 11 ITS El-IKLIDIG SIUMP COORDINATE Ill uA,D­E­­FOR TREES THAT RE 10 BE 1-1-TED M­TO MEE REMOVAL RE-1 S.U.Il­R Ell.-­U­..IS 1ILKBM ME X 2020 am,mn X AEMOIE MEEI.­R EIIIIIII 11 LMT,OF COl9T11CT.Ol IKI IS IQODED AMID IOT ALL TREE,Al,I—p TlPQlFO­S­F o EIFITIll TREE/1-1 11-I-ECT I�TI.ES E­AT E.-ND 1969 ll X COIFI­1111 RU,NZCTOD.�G�C�OL=CSO S F�­,.E �­�­,SECC 0: AOFF.111.­.�1- x x L RE E R.CE COOADlATE FEKE 1E.OlI IT EASI1G 19N 80MI4 REIAITEI Ill GENERAL 10-00 19"8IIE.-TO xwm '11CIOlAL U.t.1 I-IS COWUETED EAI­G FENCE AT 1ERMETIR OF-.1 SlIL­1 PAR-t RE-PE AL ALL TREES. X. ROWFI PARACE TE fl-­­G E.TEIIOR STOOPS, ­T­AMID SMALL­ITIES C-UlATE RE—OF SMAIL UIF-1 pY ­LOCAL V I ­UARM ­C 1—-10 E­ 6' 11E I E-D 1. .2-­E. ­-U.­ DO ------------- _O,M_:,MZ FO,,­ALL ON OF BROO.IM CEl7ER SIANDARDS AAD SRECIFI-S. OWNER..LOCAL.TM 1�10�1 -LINE 1.OUEMI -R 10 DE-1-­­1 RE.-OF UIUI.ES...-IRI 01 REMOVE EIFSTIK­BEI­S,B-AL.,-RA-S,COKAETE SlURS lAMR-OUTI,I TK.R ElTUAET` FOlMD- x KIME C111ETE I 11"IT REROUTE MCE.E. All OA F,=:1 REA'.E_ =01 :I U.`DEE`1'CT:..­.D`=T`. ­R17'S E. MAE. D SE-E AREA COOADI.TE RE­01 SlAUL UTILITIES­.RAOREFFTF 0.101 AlD Ul--F-ES AE­CORE OPE-1- I- -OlE R­�T E­­IMDEIDAOUID PIPE OUTLET REMOVE IUETAL SIDE—DRATE 11 ITS E- ;3 RE­EIFSTlI 12-DAAETEI STORM SEWER RPE 11 IS Ell- RUIOVE 1111 AND OR­l-T 1.I.EIR ill­ PERMIT XRE I'ILfTmc LIL"'1111 AAI/OR E­­ll.1-1.E.T�- .1 SMALL .11,-.-T, X R � I'l ­pAlES SUBMITTAL X .1­1­S11-­Ill ITS F-U..F.Ul.o. 1 14 X Ir III CITDUI�l ITOR III 1E1-11 EIIIII 1111-1- 1.­1-IllIA-D. 1. Xx T.L E.__ _ lCLU­1I­COORD--RE--lEAR 1119 ..E- ASI nNAI Intl lE.-.1-S I-D Xx' V� 1 1.1 SE.- 1965 Bu I' I-F 1�� E REA.-AT 1.FI X TO IS­""­_'A—OF I- P. IF­n'r. 'CO'­17 X x AEROUTE/FEUOILFTE-SM-E� EDUD FOR-010'OlSIMMIl.COORD­RE-OL"ALL UTUlFS­1ROPE11­R All LOPAL Ut-IT, 111 1 X _/I�­�FEAAUCnKROAD Cl�:,.ZEr LINE IS NEEDED FOA­/ITC.DDlIMULT.Ol IDD-1 I-OF SMIL 11. X I UFF E­C C­ CLOD.'1111.1S AND FlUlOAT-S IS TO PE111 PPOTECI­P1 11 IL TIMES. wPE E111"I �-EST,1.,R�E- I 71!�EE U`11�CE­ S=_-­­1l`DT` -,L.1"El.R'S'll 1.C1 FRORUSED CONNECTIONS. I_ SEL l UAEE BUILD BE C'.ZEI'1_ RE_-DE.OUI.l -EAD FIRI X x ORE11I 11 ­E MD BAC-ITIL RAE..I.L­COKREFE OR FOLLOW IL Cl,OF B­CENTER ST— D SAEC-­1 C.IZI R11 TEMR-11111"1111.POl.Ul­­.--OFF FROM S�TE DUR.­­T.SHALL NOT DROl D-RECII 10-1 �T.E D_ N % x X x V 12EMOLITON AND REMOVAL N07ES: U X SAIOB TO ESS­T�l IDE.OUT­ALL EROSON"D SEOMEI,T CONTROL IFAIIIES 10 SEE lSFAU,EO MD I.SPECTED 81-C11 OF BRWI­CElTE1 ALL x.X I ELF "I-All­IED IFBOA'I--STRUC1. SILT 1­11-BE-1-13-NO THE IS"L.IS I TFI C.__,RE OlSIB��eTEOFM�ECE_l III L­01`ALL EIIST111 U11TE1 T.E S­VEFUEF`THE LOCIT.Ol.E­T­ U I E ZfT�Z FLAT THE ElDINUE1.AR-TEIT OR 111L.DUES NOT OU­T11T IL TlE U1.11l1S ARE E-1.UTIU ll ST ­­2 FOR FIELD L)C.T.lG EIFETIIG FILLIES L-IT UT.- MAA IR STATE OFE� 1 611 X OFF_I DAMADE ILIAE DIE To.......❑X 3 ;�"l BE I..­ID T.AT E NOT I- ""` 5 'S of 0.-SE-, r.E WlT­TOR IS TO A 11 THE SITE All-THE To 08TAI�T=Rl_­OF ID ITARF OF CONS-10A.­C IS ELECIR ES COORDINATE OFICOlIECTIOl 01 EAC.LT.-.11 111 Ullt, E F4�tSCD BUUDlD'O� DEMOLITION AND LwfB DER I --Ell..1 1.BE PRO-11D A'IL TM11 EROSION CONTROL 6 X :�­0 CURB AND WITER TO BE REIOID III.III SCORE OF TI`RDITT­TI LINES TO NE lEAAEST A­ PLAN X... B-Ol-D IREPAREO W SUWE­SURVETIll Alm 8� ALL­ THE ;Z Ill OF ­TIR ­1 EDOUE-D KFAAI. TRUFIC XCO.TFUD,A�N To RE,C ST I I­ d 1) 1.-ITARF IE- UlEI­L SE DIE=200=ZOW A�ALAF­DE-I101 SIAIITS OR TO­AT OF­.­D-OFFOl TI FE11VE T.E AND­-R TO CII OF BR­CEFFITAT 1A Rozonft aMJ PUD Sublft-WIER I%W!2 SbAiI Sublidmil -MRIA U 2012 L4j T.1,A IlT RE— D UTUF`­.-LUATS ART I.BE C I OR. III A-.C.-.R I. SbTit A-Apd 10.2012 I C1..`E-' X`Z­4�17. ­IMUI2TI.DX­AMO COORDIFATE ALL­.1 1.1 CITF OF STRO. - TLI �1 I 111,R.ILB11 IEIEIII.-,.IIEI I-E-LIABUE. L,CE_, PRRjt SubmirM- 1 19.2012 'I C.ZZ2'�' ALL FR_ DO_ IL COISNUITIll All­E-FIAL-IRTS.1�ADDIT-AL r ,y T I ".FOR ll PW*SubrI-May 16,2012 Xl� IAI SlOILD�BEEN 81­NG TI ARCI A. ��RDI�`OISF­ENIF-E INDI"DO On IS S.O.1 11�-IDIII-E 1-TIOl PRIOR 10 STAAT OF COISTRUCTIOl.TAE CONTRACTOR I TO COWWlAtE III TIE OF­O­N CElTER FOR TIE O­T R­COISTRICTIOl ENTRANCE LOW-, I NN rI I X I I :­C'TO PrAlT OUrT­IL EROSION SED.ENT CONMOL EASUKS ARE 10 BE FISTAULED AlD I.SPECIED 81 S-OLE CREE,IIATERElED DIRIIT NO LI B'DO CE OF C"C'l ICl 1,TlE CO-TOR IS TO CUE­­1.1 NE FIELD Tn1 .1,�IE­DIII,NAT I.-FIOI I. ­TFE AME AO`�IT"Xl�­IEIT OCCURS OFTE1 NE DITCl EDGE IS CZW'0_E1`BD=E.' M"­IS'I S.""' OISFACT AAD NE C­ BRICALM TO CON111 All ED Ol 2 T�-nt- by­dRrIqdRdp.,Wwn mEd IMW I #*AWD ANT'LmkAbW Ifipr mmdL KdwndftdW j.d A.IV- Dmewy 16 202 L,,.NA. I9181 laliniR M. 12207.00 aR 61 ETL jwm sHEL DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C1.0 L ABBREVIATIONS PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS- N Bu BR,en Bw .BOm4P1 CONSiRUC110N UurtS .'.'.' ON 1o11 Boa�wd III :..:. F „.,, `t0` -� •__._ .._.......... ,-wN _.___ ',--.:f /,a .u..., .., .._. _ ,.,,.. rFEv Y E/B.IOC - GPER LINE 'K SAIGUT LAME(WENTSE) ---------- Cfo.n n„aa 1 M nq O F L r-E P, eva Ion PwoPoS[D CONTOUR -11mD­ Nv M.n .... _ ; x TL i s ....... ..._ ... G,° RM SEWER L N �Y +'S Dw F q 69TH- A[VENUE NORTH ; B D IN S[CTOI NP Pbaa _ __ :.s 'LATE FN,U Pa P C .[.:. .: __. ._.. EWER P1.SECTION TW H L . - -, ERDSON CONTROL wa tW°co 3 SCALE D 1"=30' POPE ASSOCIATES INC. Y A>` 2 W IT,] '�` ) ''I { _ - "'a -- __- -'-- """"' BLANIET(TEMPORARY) C wAPPRO%IMATE DSTURBED AREA 11 ENERGY PARK DRIVE 60' IS 5.85 ACRES ST.PAP MNsMOeslle } L - - N.(BSI)A41ix00 EROSION CONTROL BU xNR(PUNA N ) __ .f FA%(6511611i101 D1gx " a c ARROW f % ,_� ♦® �- 3, I GxAINAGE apw RETAINING WALL NOTES ( �. 1 ♦ Fe RRUwNG WALL i ILL TOP,MAD BOTTOM FL[vATgNS CORRESPOND TO THE RESPECIM GRADE ELEwigxS ON EACH - ODE«THE RAM MARANATHA NOWMAIL SNOT TODIATgv HDI OF THE LOW GRADE SITE«THE WALL.MOT THE T ti`:;,i •» .k: {. 3 T.;BO T L[B RED S R COU G x. �AroN« W SESUL« VE RS[ HERE FIGTROAL SKILLED CARE Spl BORWO _ ROTERNE F[NC MG Al 1HC TO ETC FEES JOONCNESLL R[FER To ARCNTFCTURAL A.UNOSCAPE PUNS AID ESFE L ♦ 1. ® ti EVER N s, ♦ I � ., F xCRRf WASMUi AREA T OP Jam• y. .e,e ;Y 1 MOSSpR BLOCK RRANNG BILL��UAT ENSESWN[D AND CERTIFIED BYL LICENSED YJ /*Z$.'.� OMNER ANO ARC"ECt RPM GESION CONSTRUCT ON p(DWS OP DRAW AU1 INA l eE u u D TO THE y { ��),w BROOKLYN NX-< _ _ - CENTER, MN , .' WALKWAY NOTES'ACTI RAxCONSTRUCTION '.,.Y .- N * IL T CONEUNN Ox S 10 COORO xMIE WIN PAWING CONTRACTOR SO 1HAT ALL STEPS AND ''' a LAxC I SLOPED PER COOS n r, / r♦ I R.All S«W LONADFUOMAL AND TRANSVERSE SLOPES ARE i0 BE PER CODE AID LEEFT III W 1 ..i ce ) .% IEZEMExTS x ,Y I 1 C�. p_-_= ® O ARE DENCHED BY Er 'j 9•f l '//: -/ • OENSTIL`SSal'FENCE?REFER O ORUL ENTRANCE I C5REFER 10 DETAIL r/[5.0. [•P•�sw+r.rwr.rr ICY IS# � §� L 1 1 x`1 USTALL HAIZ/DOT]IBS UTFLOM 1 TEMPORAm STRAW USER EROS OM CONTROL BuxNR 4 � J �"9 ', M-.. S.•S / i5 1 Irr ❑ FL RATOx BAS.AND TER GUALm TRGTUENT PONDS ARE TO BE ROUGH GRADED A SURROUNDED MATH sLT FENCE PEP ORAL x/C5C CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC WITHIN `� "°=' 'N'L'"• ' 3. -,s - ? J1 - -- 1 THEY INFILTRATION TD FINAL IT NOT ALLOWED AFTER AREA HAS BEEN 07 APPRO E K AREA BECOMES COMPACTED,LOOSEN SOIL WITH MECHANICAL TILLER PRIOR TO FINAL STABILIZATION. INFILTRA710N AREAS ARE NOT APPROVED BORROW SITES AND ARE NOT TO E BE USED FOR DOUBLE _ I SHALL TIM FlL AT A PALL D.6 I RING �iw 6O eoolI � �• x-a.. � j-.. _ _ SNFlLMTROMETERI TEST CDNIf CONTRACTOR BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE. THE TESTS SHALL BE SIGNED BY AIREHG5TERED CEO E NIGL ENGINEER AND Gs GD 3d' � ` �` ry - -- SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AND WATERSHED FOR REVIEW BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL CONCRETE WAS OL AREA REFER TO THE NESO GENERAL RM 0 t I`: / ��' 3. ® 4•,.j(. E 5 PoE5C5D5 STORM WATER P i FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY'FOR WORE DRAnS. u T 1w H N THAT CONTA NED-ON THE CONCRRERDELrvEM TRUCKS TAPE AN AC EP1AB C ALT[RNATN[ 0 ON SOE[ON ANMENi. `♦ L r j � J � PROx ILA LOCATION xOAF S N .TALL MN/DOT]BBB CLASS I PERM.AIENT ENIG.-STABILIZATION RAT. STOOPS AND STARS AND OR RAMP REOURED ADN[EM i0 EGRESS DOORS. NSULL BW L Daln ♦ L` CHECN PER GRAIL t♦/CS.T. r t -• AB ZATIOx y�T ARE TORT.OF CI SCUT OPExwG 17.MN/GOT 310 SEED urx AT A RATE OF BOA PER WERE AHD rNSiALL LAN/DOT SEK CLASS x PERUAMENT EROSON yl 5 •� /•-/ ! I �'6`•.'y) -I ST HE EVENTS (( ♦1 I ED wE5 O °{ I< 11.2 ,.'® .:.?!aL•• �1` YC' S ____ .'L L" [ '.° •�1.] x 2 X, EROSION CONTROL NOTES i FBT t 39 t. CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE NSU11EID PFOR i0 ANV S7E GRADING OPERATIONS. THE CITY ENGINEER AND BATERSIED DISTRICT MUST BE NOTIFIED UPON IOUPLE`_OF RESPONTE I a :,a I.1♦1\� D I K Of THE REOUREO ER LT}S Au0 PR OR i0 ANY GRAD VG DR OCMLIrox OPERATIONS BOING OR REUUENCED.R THE[OMRACTOR L EROS OU CONTROL aRE CONSTRNOTON GRADING D.-SHE A W.TIE CITY ENGNEER AND WATERSHEG DISTRICT, F DAMAGED MOVED DU TING LONSTRLgTGN SAL PERMIT yy `Y JZZ r FACILITIES SHALL BE RESTORED AND AN PUCE AT TIEING Or EACH Uv. J J 2 ANY Ell-CO FAC LIES DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY OR WATERSHED.BEFORE GOING DR AFTER THE GRADING A[rvTfS SHLLL BE'GALLED AT THEIR REWEST. Z-1� I ` r e n J NO DCVLATONS SMALL LBE MADE fROU TIE ELEWTTONS SHOWM ON THC APPROVED GRADN4 PLAN W ut PRO-APPROVAL FR M THE C,r. SUBMITTAL _ ^ ° FOR 9TE5 GREATER rw•N 1.0 ACRE.AS REQUIRED By THE uPCA PFRMT REOU REMEMS T PERM APPI CANT MUST EP AN EROSION CONTROL INSPECT LOG. IGPE HDN MST Bf Y°d _`,I ..' rr >•^r"� `X' __ / "I ♦ MADE GTC E SEVEN DAYS AND WTNNOI♦xWRS AFTER EARr RAw EMCNT THE WSPE«gN RECORD MUST BE MADE AWUBLE TO THE CITY AND WATERSHED MATH,21 HOURS« BRA 61 r REOUESI E 2 _ v _ SHILL RA O SEO MEHTAi ON BAS xs O RATE EMRGY D54PA EFS O FNeEVEN MSP«R 0 i A1� S FLOWS FROM pvERSroN CHANNELS OR PvES T OR PCRwxENT JY x r `; A_ r` --♦ ----- S[DWENI i0 O.iFLOw TO UTEFAL CONVEYORS AxG1RlO PREV[NT CROYON AND SEOWCNTATbNTwHEN RuxOFF FLOW$'TOR THESE C«MYORS ` 'r p,R 3 6. ACCESS S, G SMALL BE GRADED OR GAYS I'SE PR BE SURFACED BEEN SIT FENCES.OOCT WHERE RE THELS OR ONES UTG PA 0 PREVCM S[dMENI FROM Fx TIG THE SITE w THE AID aI. ♦, ' • '. :,_ '- �' y 55 NWDS. SrtE-ACCESS RWDS/DRrvCwrS SHALL Bf SURFACED WR.CRU5rrt0 ROCK wNER[THEY ADJOIN Cx5TrNG P AvS. . r :P. ?_____--� T �, x "a < •I > LS TEAL „FROM THE STE By MOTOR vENgLES DR EOU PMENT SNLL BE CLEANED CITY FROM PAAED ROADWAY SURFACES OR MORE FREOUFNTLV If REQUESTED BY COY ON I r �z 5n[ y BI wiERSHED�T RWGHOVT THE DURAT ON O AB NB ,I �♦. ',�I••--r _ __ FLpIStRUCigN - T e 8. DOS CONTROL ESURES 5 NA BE PERFOquED PER OD LLV WHEN CONDITIONS REQUIRE ANG/OR AS DETECTED By THE CITY OR WATERSHED 11y, I 9 . ALL Ell CONTROL MEASURES SHALL NE USED AND MANTANED FOR THE DURATION 0 SITE CONSTRUCTION F CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR NATURAL TS DAMAGE OR INTERFERE BE RESTORED 1p SEVEE rlEq INTENDED FUNCTION AT THE END O Ur OR Al SCOTT AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. .� SE EROS ON CONTROL MEASURES.THEY SHALL 0 ]70y a�a a + -_-- rJ ��) t N AREAS DSTURBED DUET NG ECONSTRUCT ON SHALL RESTORED AS NDT;PLC PoSS BLEDCRWAr AREA BE SEEDED BEEN MFINISHED AGRADED FORT.AREAS THCOLLIE BEEN OR WK IICC/ -- 0 DISTURBED ANDTEOR wHgH GRM NG qt SiE Bu LpN4 caNS N OPCRATgNS SDUR TMLY LAN ANY HALL E w AN ULCH 5 SR Zi 2Or____ ^ . ♦OAK: En HER M u5 LuM1 O P [ROSgN. m t T RANG AN APfE SHALL BE F AT AN;.ptED 1 I x TI--STRAW uULCH SHALL I ND CO A.D APh EOHAT ALAN RRACREBAND OT LESSRO» .� W_, • _ ORM R1 LESS i Nc TWO S THAN T ,n T P i --'PROPOSER BUILDING 1 - I _-- Y ; B AREA 4 AMgP F OST EVELOPED Wnlx NS F W«A TEMPORARY vEG NE CWCR CON55 UG«uluxES1A DE ARTMEx « B64.3D -• ' ,,..; - ro _-- ORTgN(INGOT)SEEDAMxTURE 1NT0 fOAT57UR0 /GD IRA MTER­EAT),SA RITE OFR 100 POUNDS PER ACREB•A Z GIG / 5 ; E. - 3LU1, L GRADED AREA MALT.NOT BE DCVCLOPEGT FOR A PERBOD GREATER THAN Sx MONTHS•PROV«A Yu PCRUANENT 1EGRAr COVER OF SEED YXTURE 1100i 191 AT A RATE OF W..: a..: _... DR T H i.0 EOUVALExT 5 BE R A.D B GROW NG PERIOD B E I L w OWED ON MAINTAINED L "" E MLTMATE DESIGN DULL RWWE STOIE1 15 xTMRE INDOT 250 AT A RATE«10 I s PFR i BE AHED AS PART«SOH B[OER4ANEMTLrDREG SEED u �^ "S. LL E!Q •A��'I _ r a r - .a... F LcwADmG eERN THN THE 1ST UNTIL NA GERMINATED N OR LANOSGPE PLAN).PERMANENT TGRF « F II _ ♦ H ♦1 Lla.x SPECFEDTELSEWICRECO ERC i RF111C ACURMAENTS 11 E.APoH 151PERLA2 SITE PU LAN) P RFSiORA1roN'HALL cau521 0 .*• LAN DO SEED 4x CARE x60 4u AE a TE W u GRE. G wTENEVCR OCHER EROSON AND SEOUEIT CONTROL PRACTICES ARE ONADEOUATE.MTEMPORARY ON-SITE SEDIMENT BASINS THAT CDNFGR4 TO THE CRTERU FEAR ON SIiC DETENTION ON BAs NS SwdL BE PRONGED A,\ "- 1 1NOFF SMAL BE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING ALL STORM SEWER CATCH BASNS FIGNINC THEY ARE NOT NEEDED DDRNG CONSTRURrON. WHERE STORx SEWER CAM FLASH$ARE W:.. �s W RECESS R FOR Sre DRAINAGE ORNCC GTTRE 11ry A su FENCE OR SED MENI PROTEapI DoN AS DETAILED SNALI 1E INSTALLED AND MMNTAWED IRa ND ILL CATCH-IS GRADING,DRAINAGE S I I TIE TR BGTARV AREA TO i.f G 5 RE BID Sn \ "- __ I Ar1TES PROP. To BEGIN AFTER OCTOBER 15 L REDD�WE AN APPROVED PHASING TSSCCHEDULS 1uRBED AT TH AND EROSION CONTROL ' L - - Z ED«TEAR MALL BE s ELY LMFED 1.F Cm WILL ALSO RfOU ADDTONAL EROSON GDN L v ES.'E.TEA•TURARY DSEDAIENT EASING.NOORMAN*A SEDxG AND Hon RATES OF AD M� '+, .:� ..<'. I? ... L PLwoN«eoT»SEED AND MLCN. E P PLAN 13 FITER BUNIR AND RIPRAP SMALL BE INSTALLED ON TIE DOWNSTREAM SIDES«ALL STORM SOWER OUTLETS x♦TOURS AFTER CONSTRUCIbN AS NOCATED AND DETAILED. ALL R RA FOR CONTROL F Wnln A SUER BE ISTA LER ZIG THE MOOT SPECNGT E NI ALL FLnR PONDS A. L ` i. P RuE1ER OF N 5 Po105 AND wETUN05 wOTN OR ApMC[N1 10 THE AREA TO BE GRADED uN1Il ;lu'eM PtIE PIS LTES SHALL BE IS wxTA H[G AROUND E E ALL U f. PIN `.'. _ � 'HE T i i H LINE.POND ON D s RESTORED, ALL 31 SLOPES 5HALL AT CNERED AT.MATERIAL APPROVED BY TIE CTVS ENGINEERING DNSON AND W'ATERENED DSTRKT,SUCH Mx/GOT 3885 CATEGORY x REUNDEB1B And P11O SUMYIW-AWrh IS,TDIT B i LANNETS O STAKED s11 , N«ILL s[wu[NT xcuaR lc I'TO'.11AIRS.DTC.ES,LANES.PONDS AND WETLANDS STALL BE REMOVEI PROR Ta OURNG AND AFTER COMPLT ON DF GRAONG CBYBROShMe Su_bnY1W-AIeTtl1 23.2012 aOILA t] EIO5 CONTROL TTEMSL AND«CES S.ALL eF IR ED ONLY AFTER THE AREA IRS IIIIIED FINAL STABLZIHON OR As DIRECTED Br THE CITY AND/0R MTENOTTI 6. ACCUUUUip Perm!S141WIY1-Ap118 T012 r .- ♦.z -�:, '"� ,C'J _ - _ + 1 cGCOn RR vS1 F S nr CoMSTNUnroB CATCH TS AND FED KERN THE Exs CCNCHAT.5 1ROI 10 BDONG IG ADDnwNAL CIMPENGr ON MALL BE P[Kmi9MYII01-MM 18 T01T 1 `_ _J _ •, .° } ... - :- �... I T T A F BSH OR C STET Q.U N REVEw ...' ` I G ADEN FOR WORN MA LCWLD 1HAK BE IO Br UC1pN ME ` I ` x0 `•� - _T T v }R ME BACKGROUND INFORMAL«♦WAS PRE BY SONDE LAID SLR WG.(952)881 2♦55. H THG ----_-- J --r -� W j H y'. - 3 i s THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPoNSBHLpv 10 ASCERTAIN TIC LOCAi OI«ALL Ex STNG uTLTES THE CON1 CTCR SNLL 1ERxv 71E LOCATION.FLEVANGI AND ILA SIGHING "'1 ,, t _ Uirlrt ES♦ HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCT ON ST S.THE ENGINEER.ARC.TTECT OR OwMFR OOE5 NOT GUARANTEE THAT «uTES ARE MAPPED OR AND 'RE EEUOwN -- IY II z 3- CORRECTLY CONTACT GOPHER OHE AT ♦-10002 FOR FIELD LOCAi IG EIG IG uT CONTACT UHLTY OWNER IF DAMAGE OCCURS DUE TO CONSTRUCTON I I fW r B 1LE1"fi (- ,� •Y.•: PROTECT AIL' LL Ex Sr NG STFU[1vRE5 ANDS Lrt ES W.C.ARE NOT SCHEOULCD FOR -- ---- ---_- 5 I y.L UT EN-TO .I SOU CON XA i +'� CL OR BEIDR[1R AID ExCAwTDN w TRACICR 5 ALL OBlAM ALL APPLICABLE PERMrtS PRIOR 10 SARI OF CONSTRUCT ON. �1`� Ifs\ t � ..,. '.. Z2 ,'' �C1f� SHOWN AS EA 23.FOR E111PLE.ARE TO BE UNDERSTOOD AT0 6423, I 5 N«N c B All SPOT EL EVAi ONS SH 0 'LL ` '1' "- Z ALL SPOT ELEVAI OHS ALONG THE CURB LNE IIIATC TIE ELEVATION 11 THE G NOTEG DTNERWISE. - -- - - -- ..._..- .. 25 uTTEF UNLESS ARE i0 -ED J:1(3 FE HGR C 1 1 'E NLE55 NO OTHERWISE. T HAV 11C111 ANY R C bN NA x[110 zS _ _ z S. _.___ •. 1 G`_S E FROMMBUILDINGS ATPALI HIES ZO OM pBl1,BpBOfi®hpnvlBpaR 11 brNroCOUV`U0NDpUTIE 4R AN HE CONTRACTOR SHALL CEREAFY)THAT ALL GRAONG AND UTLOY WOR w5 PERFO D N ACCORDANCE BO.THE APPRINED WM ybV OMNOBE ONAD rv4 ANDS UTI nRPERMiSADIN ASDBU AND U1LTV PLAN SNALL VBET SUBUnED TO THE CON FOR RIDNEI AIDRDSFBLUDN C Edfailmr.d Lk-OPIAembirml EDgk Rul 12. P UANCE OF BUIDIG PERIOS.AL NECESSARY EROSIDN CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE N PEACE AID FuNCTOI AG N[ m AND WUERS.ED MALL ASPECT TIE SITE TO MEINOW IN. 1W Iw.1 MOFBEGY. ,WTI -Aesii DETERMINE IT L IE5 IF BEEN R ITS Su TAB CITY FOR Bu IDUG ACirvG ES. N T.[PUBpq CATCHES HA BE "STALLED Al ins PO MT O NAv1 B[NECESSARY 10 wi.HOLO FORCING NG PE un5 FOR _`D'E'111 i0 ALLOW 1H CONTRACTOR r F TO ERFORM T.5 WO 1 f (1 - [[ RAROR ADEWA E SPAS E NOT d„v✓ f 13 ALL DEBRIS IRGTED N THE PROCESS OF CLEARING AID GRADNG THE STE .ALL BE REMOVED FRO.1.1 STE. THS INCILD11 TREES AND S.RU85 UNDER NO CRCUMIUNCfS SMALL h y�✓ ,rl,(E�; tN5 TYPE OF MATER AL BE BLIP ED HR BuPNfO ON THE 51 ....s..z a 'e ... "' -'=.> _ t♦ THE N1ENT 5IQ STRIP AHD GLVAGEO ToPSoL FOR POTENIML C,$PRGI NG IN THE s1E F APPROVED BY THE urvpscAPE ARC.1E CT AND/DR sPEEFUT DNS. sx INCHES OF r� JGeI W.Maier ROPSDrL-AFTER CDMPAC1bN-SHALL BE RE-SPREAD PRIOR i0 SEEONO AND MuLCH.G. FMCESI IOPSOII MAY BE RE.-C FROM THE SOE PRCYCING TT 1ATE TOPSOIL A,=C i0 PROPERLY FINISH THE SITE AS NO BCVC. THE 10PS0il ST NO PE-SPREADING CHILE BE GONE iN ACCORDANCE TD THE DBIeLMdy 16,2017 Li[.NO. 19181 PPROVED GRADING P AND SPECBrGTbNS.T L RRER i0 HIE ST DRAWINGS AID SPECIFICATIONS FOR r SPECIAL TOP G BE ME CONTRACTOR SIAL PSOI O 15. OPERATIONS ONTO AILACEnt a111111T THE ANY DAMAIL TO-Al(ITTERPOTEN11S FIR IsBE C1111IEI AND 1ESTGRED CONTROL c THIN LS PERMISSION-IT GREOIED IF'.THE"'AGE" CO mi.N. 12207.00 1101 FLYING PROPERTY NERS)ONto A .G E P DPERT�s E c0 ANT T. A Dam h) ETL 1 TIE SITE W PROCEEDS TlU THC w 1RBE0 AREAS OUTSIDE tNE BUILDING FH RINTS ARE TO BE u --- --- RASTfO SITS: AREAS PuxNED TO MECEVE P EN HARE 10-HAVE SUSS ST BASE INSTALLED:ALL DIRER DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BF SEEDEDp STRAW uULCH IF LAID. D - - JWI.•- PREAp MR T. AND ST-O TO B.W 1111EY UIC.ING SNA .SMAICRUL SPREAD H a H1E LAD MAIERAL THE DISC-A.C.OBING L'.1 'HEOSOR LMAY BE Sf{F�MITI=SHALL BE DEINED AS­1-MATEPIL LACED w MGGE'.,AIION.u NFOUi,I DISC-ANCNDIIHG MAYBE A .RED W.T.HYDRAULIC L SILL STABILIZERS NAY BE IROZEH TO'HEO50IL B+APPLVIN. P iI0u1 ULCH PER I WATER AT A RATE OF 2000 WLLONS PER ACRE.w THE MULCH A`A A HG TER 5uB5i TUl OU FOR DSf Nf.OR 17. RCTANNG WALLS AND APPROPRIATE SAFETY FENCING ALONG THE TOP O RATES ARE TO BE DESGNED AND CERTIFIED By A REGISTERED PROFESSONAL FIGNEE-. S LTT RETANNG WALL C2.0 �� S.1P UN,R.T.TO PROVER TEA.PRO-TO COrv5T1ucU / 1 1 GRADING. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 16 THE mNTRACioR SHALL LM1 T.E DnuRBFO AREA>s.°c.>s PISSeLE C2.0 I ABBREVIATIONS PROPOSED PIAN SYMBOLS N BM C.1cnWn [B ColcnAem:II CONSTRUCTION LIMITS -.-.-.-�-•-�� COxC �~ PROPfRTV LINE DIP G17,z V.I.P_ 2' ---- EXEV PrNUOI. SAWCUT LINE(AFFROX.) -________- \ WATER PIPE NDPE v velrWlexR • ...:... a xv S ?i.)l,e,1 Y ET J SAVt ". •'Iz Y N tAxa -- RRN - '0.If nORM isLfE w ER --i--- LM Fx„ .Mognn n oe 1 Errb S.NTARV SEWER a3 M mum _ • TI --- RE-ND WALL Pv P,Po.t.. AN 69TH AVENUE NORTH ; :• ») MANNDLE • AP Rlml GREp END i x RO� ROOT D.o 1 30' 15' 0 30' 60' U -•.. ur / 0 t DARED END SEO ON WI RPPAP SCALE 1.1 30' POPE ASSOCATESING wArfR VALVE N Ins ENERGY PARK DRIVE �..-...f K .. - ST.PAP MNs-a- W 1 PosT NgcAlo wuvA 't v �., }• 2rU ^.21 ______L PPE MDRANTR FAx R65116k2-10 ----_-_ � IL(651)N2 ■16f411RR f > ® RW61Y1DII 0 T L E PIP INSULATION MARANATHA KEYED NOTES SKILLED CARE d 31; x[VED NOTES ARE DFNOR M ® ON PLAN F p A CNONNCC!10 EX51AG II x[ G AM SCwCR M.AT OVERT EIEV TO 85.60 Br CORING NEW OPE'xG w INC EXISTING WNNOIC.PHW OEN j �y` `V �- j . ' Yi ; ELONV 800!SEAL AT NEW PPE[AND MAIL. ELENNI AS DEGREE PIMNBCND AND EXTEND SERVCE A 0 yTE.REFER 0 SARTAM SEWER w [ BROOKLYN BCLOw FOR PP[LFNGT.S.SLOPES AND MER1 EtEVwipxS of NEw SERVCC PP[. - ' F • y v --,. , � ---- 1; ---C�� -_. __ ---. -- a ST B B-PANNfII RTAIP,ISEW CONINROF P-FE;�TICPoy OSE a XADRVG TIT NN RT ELEVATION 65).11.GOdIgIWE EXACT LDUTION AND INVEST CENTER. M N INSTALL INSULATION OVER PROPOSED SANNM SEWER. REFER TO INSULATION ORAR•/C5.1. IIL____ ©REM WC EXISTING B WATER SERVICE BEND AND CONNECT NEW B NCH WATER SERVCE PPE TO EXSLNG.EXTEND BR WATER SERVICE TO I.E!G -=�• -� - s!-t © - SOUK A IN WATER SERVICE BE OxTIE EXISTING BUILDING BUILLDNG SPOFF�CONTRACTOR SN4L COORD WT[wnn GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC OWNER LMI IN 1 ©w INS BEEN DEMOLSNED EXTEND 6'WATER LOOP. T ROOF DRAIN OUTLET SCUPPER LOCATION. BKBM ___ WO100 --� ❑ Q CONTNVE NCw 8 NC.WATER WN L AN R i I.El U%TI NIS BEEN DCARUSVED. tAaW6:b L�uIIA i IS H PROTECTION LINE 10 WTnw 5 FEET OF PROPOSED BUILDING FOLLOW ALL Gl a BR ONLVN CENTER STANDARDS AND 1 l O STUB B wCH FINE �P D Hro AN S E 0.0 B q G -- F H J L_-__ SIDE FCAIIONS. e❑SPECFGtp ESTC WATER SEPACC TO wTHN 5 FER OF PROPOSED B LONG FOLLOW ALL Cm OF BROGX CENTER STANDARDS AND GOOD ' u y` w.nx-wrw Wr 12 I-- Ip INSTALL XC*B AC.PRE PRDOECiIOx LINE TO ExSnNG BUILDND.GINNER OO EXISTING a NCN FETE SERVICE AT APPROx WOE LOGTON S.DVIN ❑FOLLNV ALL Cm Of BFOONLYN cEMER STANDARDS AND SP CFUigIS. / ---- • ' INSTALL OOMESTC WATER SERVICE O 10 E%SxG BUILDING CONNECT 10 Ez STAG. xCn WATER SEMCC AT APPROXIMATE LOCATION r---- O SNOWN.FOWL• ALL Cm OF BRDONLVN CENTLF'STANDARDSO AND SPLCFryiONS. AuDAFDs I❑2 INSTALL POST AOCAIOR VALVE ON B NC.FIRE SERVE.F OF BROONLVN CENTER ST AND SPCC FCADONS. Nv1ALL FIRE.MR.ANT ASSEMBIr NCLUD NG TEE,GATE VALVE AND IODWNT LEAD FOLLOW ALL Cry DF BNOONLVN CENTER STANDA RDS AND I CC UC8TINC NSOALL 0 H E i R C-PT OLIpv ALL TS E BROW NEW CENTER STANOARCONNECTS AID PIDf Gl EXS.ALL GTE vAlv[S SHALL HAVE PACxAGEO MASHES UM ANODES PER REOUREMEMAI w.[SE N W WATER ON[EXISTING WATER CON SA 11-P NC DICAW SEWER G lLAS BE 10 REMAIN N SERVICE iIS 196E FOROL`ED CARE CENTER 5 D^ME OXNE1NDDAS SAKI NON R ANWIDEM CE p w N LA E CE BU LUNG IIN BEEN OR DECOMMISSIOIE SAID AND IS OR F BPDDO ON BU HEALS M SE ER N LE AND BACRFLL P rtn LFAU CONCRETE BROWN SAID OL ul B xLVN s INSTALL•ACN GTE VALVE.OLLOW ALL CITV OF BROONLTI CENTER STANDARDS AND SPEC-i ONS. INSTALL 8-RA-x5 DEGREE KID wI.1ONI RESTRUVT.FOLIgR ALL-OF 9ROOILLNN CENTER STANDARDS AND SPECFKAIIONS. E E t ' t © ! - • " A' �'�- r -- H Q ARG DRAWS ARE TO a WON NOOF GRIN OUTLET SCUPPERS,COOROXMIE EXACT LOCATN)N OF AREA DRATIS wI.IGNANACAL CONTRACTOR AC.N5 DEGREE BEND WON­NI RESTRAINT OLLON uL cm OF BRCOXt � . -- � 1❑9 INSTALL• rN[[MFR STANDARDS AND SPEC fCAl ONS E ❑O PRq+DL 6'WHEN OO DATE NGVE AND E BOx ANO 8 N[N WATER SERVICE SILBLFO M C SE E Lt. ANODE CE SIU. OR FUTURE N DEMOL SHED A VALVES s nAVC PA PNAGEO MADE s PER<TV REOU REIAEMs P. ` ___ W.ERECT.E xEW wAI[R SERVCE CONNECTS iG HC E%ST NLL WATER SERVICE. R ). ``�,, A C' O uS1ALL CUSS UR RPRAP AND GEOTE%T LE FILTER BNX AT CULVERT OUTLET,REFER 10 DETAL 2/C5.1. § ��I' y'K' `�) A ❑R STUB B NCn SANTAM SEWER 10 LOCATION SnOWN FOR FITIRE BUKDNG AT INART ELEVATION 056.13. PERMIT r }J NSIAU.APPROx MATELV 215 FEET Of 12'DIAMETER CI-ASS 5 RC CULVERT PPE NCLUgNG FLARED ENO SFLTO MANHOLE.INLET ELEVATION j 9 859.00 AND 01-ELEYAIN)N 852.50,RM ELEVATION OF 18 DIAMETER MN S 86220 AND AVERT ELEVATION S 65�98.EXISTING'N51 uECIGLANOUT P R AC ED WA1fR SFM CE A'R[[R oRONS uigNCFpFRT 0 v60LATpN DETA,I B/L5.1. SUBMITTAL 1 `X' © ION ONCR PROPOSED STORM SEWER •/C51 -d E --- ---- x-- - -- 1 PPE TER O CONFIRM 10 PE OF FILL St NSTALL ARRC AND C RP RAP AI RLOF DRAIN --- DArLET R NAN REFER OO STOP[ G[OtEM LE L u55 II , WO 4 O SLIT 1 2' OUTLET PER NN/ppT STANDARDS.REFER TO ORAL 3/C5.I. A NS C __ ❑ TALL 8 AC.225 DEGREE BEND WON JgNT RESTRANI Cm OW FOLLOW ALL C BRICALVN CENTER STANDARDS AND SPECFCAlp.S N� F A OY � I I 1 - `` Y------y r I I UTILITY NOTES: I t CDORDrcMT SERVICE AT THE B O.THE MC HEAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION NO ADDITIONAL I ' E Y' I 1 ---- i__-- 2 AL4S[Rw[O COnE.IT0N5AwlOollI5Aiq N5p BUILDING w ULANON SHALL BE NSTALLEG AT L 1 I �____ TI LOWED FOR UNCOORDINATED I- '_ ' EEO Of[w[R OvER r.E*OR pF PPf ARE OO eE IvSUUrEO RNs IOCANONS INpGlED.TO!NE Pom!WNCN!NE SERVICE ATTAINS 6 FER U COVER. U I � i PROPOSED BUILDING %NX1 i _ -- PROTECT ul ExSTxIG STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES WNCN ARE NDT SG.E1,1(ID BE RE-1O. 16 FFE 864.90 A % ' r ' 1 j ri AD P. s�5 1 ' I I r - • ALL SEWER ANT) IT WA CROSSINGS SWLL HAVE A DS AND OT 15 FER AN R¢ONIAL sEPARAOpN Of ID FEET OuOw ALL : VT 1 I ' I F --- 4N DEPNOMExi OFOLABOR AND MDUSTM STANDARDS AND TIN OF BSROOAxRLAVN CENTER STANDARDS NO II r _._-__. .. ___- r _ 5 ALL WATER Ww5 MALL BE DUCTILE ETON PPE.CLASS 52.Ux1E55 NOTED OT.ERw SC. L - W.f Y 1 ' __ -- ,- 6 ALL WATER WS �L cvr NA ALL DEPT.OF CMAR OF BO FEET CAR TOP Or WATER MMN_ RESTRAINTS ON PREVDE TNR WATER WW PER C1r OF BRpONLrN[ENTER PROVDE MECNANCit ANT R[ ALL KIDS VuvES. TEES PLUGS AND.1GRANT LEADS. SANTARV SEWER L BC ASl4 OJO]A SOR 26 PVC UNLESS NOTED OT.ENWSE,GNOAM SFW[R"PING UNDER TN[FUTURE BUILDING T I I I I I I ADDiON$n.ALL BE S M D3665 SC EDULE AO MC. _ L 9 PIP ( ) 2-INCH RCP STORM SEWER PIPE WALL BE CLASS 5 S70RI SEWER PIPE L___---JI I " STORM SEWER CULVERTS SMALL BE REMORCR 5 PNV[YFRE - - I ' I -c: FOR AREA GIN NS F- ---- SNA1L BE ARM DN TRAS J'.® 11 I II - r0. A L FLARED END SERONS ARE!0 NAVE H GUARDS,Ill DOWNSTREAM ULARED END SECTIONS SrwLL HAVE GCOTE%TILE FABRC AND wPRAP PER Mx/DoT s1ANOwaos AS KIALED. E PRIOR 10 START OF CO 51RUCip COMPANIES ID A N I N I j 16 A / ; ' I E______i ARE PRNATE COMRACTDRS ARE 0[OORO HATE ILL WORX WiN GS ELEC RC TEL vSON AND iCLEPNOxE[O - AD HA / I ------ I I 12 ALL PROPOSED AND EXISTING LUIILRIES CONTAINED WIIHME THIS$TIE _ T 1) � I I � I F ; 13. ALL V Lm CONNECT 0x5 TO CTV IOU TES$DALE BE NSP[RO M COV SiwfF. J 1 UTILITY PLAN : i i I N6RP L I L F I 1 _ NOTES FOR WORK .1 PUBLIC RIGHT OF MAY PoxD I `` 1,UTILITY .- ALL Lm DA BN,CONTRACTORS CENTER STANDARDS AND SPCCFG1 WORK N Ar AND OBNN ALL APPL hT. Go WB f1 J R ❑ BRl Ne6 L- ' -/ ' I PR OR TO CONSTRUCT Ox CONlRAClORS ARE i0 COORD DATE ALL wOR RG.!OF w CABLE PERMITS Remnirg and PUD SuDmlWl-11fIN 151012 j . I I I SANITARY SEWER TABLE WidSIm0aSih1Ydal- ' STFIC7URA PW d SUbrr ft-Apr 10.2012 PC AD M]A OI.II� N IOSTR STRUCTURE ......N GAS NG ELEVATION �RO PPE LENGT.,DIAMETER.SLOPE k NEXT UPSTREAM STRUCTURE IT INCHES, EL A N PTJRIIE St&ntbBI-April 19.2112 n SrvE 2❑]r. - I . . NA 3 60 S/. s. IF W ID'PVC PIPE O H 02 Subani11WI-Mry 19.2012 _ - Y2 _ r Aa a r-r I I I R t23J 6].0 E SERVCE `( N Y2 E. 55.3 6'PA PPE a SEW 1 S. F OF IO'M P .NY] IT - iO N 0 / M.Y] AB R-1233 063.10 S 556 0 F OF 8'MC PIP PIPE xepO NG u 1) I I I -a I r I r ; L SL 1 R I 1 1 I I ' SS9LF.OU B PVC PPFEO I, xx BU LANG STUB TI _ IIYI ❑5 x + " N STRUCIUFE xEEWN TOP STORMS TABLE EWER TA Dr R II 1 ... ° ---� IOENiFCAT ON OMENS ON UST NC ELEVATION ELEVA ON PPE LENGTH DIAMETER SLOPE k NEXT PsIRLAU STRUCTURE j k _ INCHES) - - ----- NA NA E.85 00 . L F Of TO'SIR JS MC PPE o tOOx,wvE N2 ° 11NIBbymRyby W- _-r =- °Y '. ^•r WEE 12 t0'%1pYt0' E. ] CLGNOUT MM RMRIIIW TRf6B11NQNYY4p 5 Lr OF t0'SDR 35 PVL PIPE a 1.00%.WAY] EDDY mOdYY DOIIIBY PIDbIIbIBI FJ�I°Af s ssAS IRdNtlrlrWYdYrWYaMU1rRY. WvE YJ %10 x W NA SCR 35 PAC PPE e x AD 131 ' F610'pSON 35 PM PIPE 0 1 00%.RV`E YA I�.'✓ >f W.: 0 (1 AD P. SEE D-L IT/CS.I TRU EG ----------------------- / - ---- -- wrE Y• 10'x10'x6' NA W NE. a IF of b'aoR 15 PvL t, PPE e I IDx.At#A. Jcal W.M- I TV 85959 36 1 F.OF IC SER 35 PV[PIPE o 1 EX m YS Dal NARY 16.2012 L[.ND. 19181 AD YAA SEE ORMI II/C5.1 862.80 1 S ------ --- CO YS SEE 1RAL IC/[s.I 662.DI L 'sDR]s vv PPE C1x wF Ye 122070--0 - WA Y6 x10 x W IOU E. -.1 J5 MC P PE a I...AD YG RIRN ice_ ETL O D'SIR 35 MC PPE e r 0 WE 02 (N(ied it __.. JWM N. 860.61 aI px ' AD YG SEE OETAII 1 1/L5.I 66].80 Sw.860.96 ---------------------------------- S. 06t OE WA 02 IO'.Ip'X6- NA W x. H6'21 nEANDU! SHEEP TA B61 U2 33 1 F.OF 6'SORT 35 PA PPE e I NOS,AD 08 AD YB II/<51 863.00 SW 86135 - -- -- -- --- --- NOTE:RIM ELEVnOON OR PROPOSED CLGNOU!IS 6-11C.ES BELOW PROPOSED GRADE REFER TO DRNL IO/[5.I. C3.0 1 UTILITY PLAN C3.0 ABR REVUilONS PROPOSED PUN SvMROl9 N Bu B1�cn puun CURC 11 ELI ELEV 2 SAw[URT Lm[S(APPRnr) —--— Ex E.•sl..p [' —III Lw[ IAT —Ewonn• jREAINNG WALL ern on . • - NUVr Du,r BRU41NO15 uu D• PAVCUEN, wN CD w•newia Yawol D•I�I •• Fuu��a 5 CONCRETE 510ENAL1 69TH A VENUE NORTH_ _- PAR—STALL COUNT ;; 30' 15' 0 30' 60' 6 ND r.AP PARKING SCALE 1"=30' POPE ASSOCIATES ING e ❑ sn -�-__-__ -- ----- -------y -- _ F u S7. F �' SS PAP MNssloDi sAilit E6S11 Nba300 I I MRTY11011 1{' _l9� _O 3).)'—u 3]) O - O ivP ❑lP ______ �6fYfbM-`' I 5if• FAX 16511 Ni-1101 „. 1 1 mM2 '� -,r+'�• ; .I 3.0 JO' L °° O O pl,.11l I KEYED NOIES I I o `! , a n' ❑] ti Q ¢° `.D- a0 '� •� ; I I' ` _ED N07ES,FC DENOTED BL' ® DN PLAN. MARANATHA ' _ , ❑w ❑ w' ❑ T- 021:lpo 7 ' ❑, 51µl BRIT CONCRETE UR B°ND LITTER.REFER TO DEAL 1,/C5.0. SKILLED CARE - JJ / ASO� A6 I Q I ❑1 EDOTR[ REFER TO DETAR 13/CS0 z ❑3 U WTV BOUY1NOUS PAVEMENT.REFER TO DETAL 9/C5.0. / O sp 150 s ALL LGxt DIF,BI,u 11S PAVEMENT.RE[R,0 DETAL B/CS°.�v W BROOKLYN V I ❑ ❑ ❑ STALLONCK @CD EDGE CONCRETE WALK REFER 10 DETAL 0 CSp ECIIIAL PUNS TOR CONCRE[.10NNNG PATTERN, ' oP I -- ©P CENTER MN O DETAL t1/[50.REFER,D/ I Q 16 �P P ° 1 O­ALL CONCRETE ouwPS1ER/TRAxSFONWN/GENERATOR PAD.REFER TO OCTAL T/C50 ,0 °a ' M° o TTT °. - -- ❑9 n,S,N.L rwNDYAPPCD PARK NG SIGN REFER i0 DEAR 5/C5.t I ------ /� °d` ° o P ❑ ❑ ° ❑° o ® SruL tt B REFER LANDSCAPE ETF DRAN (SwALEfP[R p,u S /G50 BKBM °r I 1 - PLANS 4 � ❑d ❑ 0 Q ❑ ❑i ❑' ❑ __ I O wSIALL CURB CUT FOR DRAN,GE SRALL PER DEAL 15/C5O ^ m� 0 1. IQ S,DOP AND SG aS.REFER 10 AaCN T[CtURa DRAW NCS FOR OEA LS. 1' 165' STOOP RAUP AND REAYNG RALL REFER 10 ARCU rEC7INAL CIPPINGS FOR DEAIS " L 1 , ❑ STOOP.ws[D P.TIO AREA x.L5.NO5spRInIFAt D�RAw'NGSIRA°LBw+,wNCS FOR xTwLs � ❑ _ D S.I6 ❑ 13* J16' ©S,WP.REFER,D,RC ODP DET.LS /may 0 W v❑ F I'� NSIALL DRNE ENTRANCE PER DEAL 2/FA0 - - ------ '--`- ; h❑ n �Se w 0 DN 6Pe Y PEN,SON.REFER TO ARCN,ECTIRAL DRAWNGS TOR DEIARS. [4j o? p \ng L __ I GENERAL NOEES- I� TIP❑o ' ry - I I ALL OYENSK)NS ARE TO FACE OF CIRB UNLESS NOTED D,NCRRSE 1 AL LwECCURB AND GUTTER S TO BE 8613 CONCRETE CURB,ND GUTTER UNLESS NOTED o I❑ \\l 1 / ------- 3. NO 5 r 1 S TO E MRE INAN A IS CROSS SLOPE OR MDR[ITTAN A 5%LONGIUDINAL °. ,vP I I� ❑ 1 ❑' - C ♦.�� i' r I.......;....... . RCO(0[[R t0 ARCw TECtURAL PUNS FOR P OPU ED Bu LONG UrOLO 0 3 1°0 (" I F BROOKLYN CENTER RAND S'NO"COIM FILES REGULATIONS AND B I❑'0' So --- 0 I' NcxOr WA c oR P 0 Wr. ,,-ED w1.ERF NE A`( - w'/CURB/S1D[wuKNw I�0 E-D..LP,vEYCN,/CURL/S DEwuK" E ARE lO B[B FEET w E Br II I ❑ D .� \ I� CD1RGORS 7ENCrvOFLBFOOfVNCENTER R RK,N oORETF PERMIT LO"C _ I �1B I r I B `oM40NLACE EI O CONTACT­EE..EUOR-PAMED EPW AND�0,rR .RUS FOR I 1 IRE PPOTEC,IDN PURPOSES 1 - il n 00 �I I I �zBO- l , S,DOPD[IAILSALLWALKS SUBMITTAL I B ' � I O I I PAVING NOTES' � X REFER To STRUCTURAL PUNS F ARE 10 BE CENTERED ON TN[ ' p, I Ie U I 2 INNS ALL AP RIATE EAPANSION LRIERIAL WN[R[CONCRETE IS ADUACENT TO BVILING TALE. 1 1 ' -0° N NOI NO ERUPT GRACE 1100 �� •`(. r____ ; ONO WAt[RSWILL EBC[MLOwED(rIS,NG PAVEU[M P e I n 1 x[u0 K UunS wnA SIT[OEYOLOON CONTRACTOR AND CONSTRUCT Ox RANACER E OFOfN[R l i ❑ I i i � _ e I NA CD N[w CONCRETE CURB Ax GunER IN1.EENw,"G a0 LUTON BROOv STAN- AND SPECIFIU,iDNS AND LUFB ry EaML AN OYENODS Ly" _ s L ,T ExK,ING BOUY1NOUS PAVEU[wT AND CURB AND ND TO NEAREST A 1 111 I ❑ P I 1 I _ RED BUILDING I -___-i III FIFE 864.30 W s , I o 10 1 l I _ I 1 IF ID / I I � 1 111 11 I Io 'i L IPAVING AND m I GEOMETRIC PLAN I 6, i1 xLxn�Bexa pe s I1 L J , 11'I �L II II I I _ -_ .. Is BaM ReIlsiRS: Y Mwd115_2 0 12 PUD S4ond r Gly rd Stale$UDDIw Mnd23.20 22 EQd N° --- ------ -- Apn az I ---- ------------ - _ 6 n:� ❑ ' LEO__ x ---- I ' Pami SDhnNiw-Mr11A2012 ' - - ---- I I Parml SLeIrIMM1-Mav 181012 'il - -- ❑1 Io i I I 1 t1 '. s o I ❑ f° I' I -�--------------. `j .. IhlllowM/O.IIip1m apedI i or lapin .,. 'M1IBI. duy c.dw Pn'61af1RWEDgk 11 - _ IS1411w Lam adit*wd----I-lY Esplrr ,. wdrlMMdMalwdAfl.Iaaola. JD,l W.M Del L/ABV ib 2012 Lk.NO. 19181 1- - Epllissip lB._ 12207.00 w.f f4 - plgs by E7L ..:....:. ........_. .__ -..-__. �...:..._..._. _......_405 ...; K2_\ Riled 1, JWM TYPICAL DRIVE ENTRANCE C4 D NO SCALE SHEF! 1 PAVING AND GEOMETRIC PLAN C4.0 I= TTAC MIT PER M4/DOT 2357 OF REWIRED) M 11M TWO(2)1001 HIGH IOCI BERM =1 -S I AGSIEGAEE'I =SISTING OF I INC'TO 2 INCH CMMfTER PER MN/DCF—MMPA­TO AT —TO —,E, PER LEAST STAlIDARD PROCTOR DENSIN. CONCRETE CUTTER NOI-WEARING COURSE NN/DOT 2360 AAWW3 2' 1 SLOPE 1 2 1.1 I: ....... BITUMINO 1111T11 IAASIAIC I- MN/ECT'E"".1"" I-ION ETE LE.—TIL III. IN SLAI REFE WITH 2 /CIOD LIVE—`N`Lm GEDEXTILE FABRIC MATCH CONCRETE SLAB TO ,TATE AT 1011TS IB CONCRETE CURB AND DU FER. I*TIIN BNO ABRUPT TRANSTICAS WILL E IOUEFEATED, INI.UM SCAR—,Dl AND 1ECDA,PACT SUBGRACE IN/11T SELECT POPE ASSOCIATES INC To A'LEAST IO0X STAIII-0 IROCITOI CRANALLAN 1299 ENERGY PARK DRIVE DENSITY-PROOF ROLL PER 4N/DOT x111 $T.PA%MN­0 1,MAMIMUM LENCTI OF SO FEET AND WIDTH OF 12 FEE' %,U)— CONCRETE I-J I�9 H,�AVY—DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 2.FOLLOW ALL CIFI.A­DISTRICT AND MKI STAN­ 3 FAx wo­,cN CLEAN STREETS ON A ONLY BASIS DR MORE FRE-ENTLI IF REQUESITUD RN'C­WATERSHED DISTRIET OR INICA PLAN VIEW �1 BERMED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 11-ALr- MARANATHA CONCRETE CURB BIT MNOUS—REfIR 10 ITTA,./CS,UP SKILLED CARE ,/C,O POSI�ON CENTE1—1 2'-0' 2- SHAEL IT. HARD"OoD. E­"C"­ 1 10 BE "HE OR STANDARI IFEEL N,C.INED A—EDCE III PAIIG TO PREANT UNDERMINING, TS POSTS SNALL EIE ��NE BROOKLYN 2-INTO THE CROUND CENTER, MN 112- 11, 2 DIECTE.E. CONCRETE W­\R .1_.EUE FRONT VIEW FABRIC• A"MINCRETE WALK F"CRANULAR BASEL BKBM FREEEN TO SPECIF—IONS �4 CURB OPENING FOR CONCRETE SWALE loi PLACE ET)TO).EDGE OF FENCE 1xZx// INTO IE DEEP TRENCH ANII xN"PAIEDIATELY, FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION IT 20 N=T`0 DSpSEUc7"­F­es THE 2 10 THICKENED EDGE CONCRETE SIDEWALK r2 SILTATION FENCE 0 No L 112 EIPAN ON jDWE,III/FULL DEP TH IOINT"ILER.BIT O.C.REFER 70 ANCIOECTU L PLAN FOR JOIN' LUCAT_ IF TOOLED JOINT I -7_1-_�,-C—=R1ElIEC'=.L PEP n A'CONCRETE WALK 6'GRANULAR BASE REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS PERMIT 11110 1U11RADE C' SUBMITTAL RITER To SPUC FICATIONS 11 CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION (TYP.) ALL DWENSIONS BACI OF CURB FACE IX.7 T°. -_�R.B, 3'P SLOPE 3/--PER 1001 .......... ................. To FLASHED GRADE IF 1/1'R IF ­CNO AGIRECATE A ,N,.UV OF 0.2.. T'7 FROM EDGE OF CUTTER OR MAICI BOX INSTALLATION 6 GATE VAIVE AND C5.0 r OF`W=`;EX2 BASE 7' To —.TNT SICTION I I SLOPE .0 /2'TE11111IN ITN' 12- SE MENT TRIP SEE DETAI S TRIP RAP. 3/8""OF.1 3/a•SAW — SEE NOTE I I-MIN.DEPTH AGGRE FE BASE CUT CONTROL ICUR 3"\ SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ­­ STANDARD Va'RAD CIVIL DETAILS PROFFOR DEN— (,P.) CONCRETE STALL BE REINFORCED ;,/,P,)WAD ­­MICRO FIBER REINFOROIZ PER 1.DIRECT'N OF TRAN­CUTTER SLOPE 10 MATCH _C`ICATCA1 D,R`CT­OF 2 CO—RUC"C N`B NANpD'T=R'1N_.`C.RCANCE AFT. TINCOF SPECIII—ON 2531 S'CONCRETE 1. Retuning and PUO SubmM-M _.rch15M2 [,LLL CRJC�S).S,AGCREGATE(1— Cly and SDKs Subritimi-Moich ZL2012 COMPAZTED TO AT LEAST I DDX ED P A L�LLL (12 8612 CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER N/COT­8 Poft SMbnMW-Apd 10_2012 STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY u PwwA SubREW-Awl 19,2D12 PwwA Subill-May 16,2012 1­1 TO SPECIFICANDALS 2-0' .ITUMINOAS GUTTER PLAN VIEW 7 '1 CONCRETE SLAB CONSTRUCTION (TYP.) U NET 11 11-L CURB BINMINOUS V-w FULL E­T 101 OF BITURPHOUS CURB WE HIC COURSE PER FACIN COAT PER MN/DOT 2357(IF REWIRED) MN/D0T 2360 W tA I air.d*Lb-W En*m ,��E-ITR.�,EC ON IN CRASS, _ASS 5—(100%CRUl .......... .......... ................... ...... FEE W TH AD ENT WMAK. I—CGMPACTED TO A -WEARING COURSE PER T.NI STANDANTO PROCTOR rl FRONT WIN UN, TED NO. CENSION. .1—INCUS OTHERWISE MN/CCT 2360 Joel W.Maier'�4 ITM III III 1 17=11 T�jj 115 I.-INCHES �,fv FBI RAP. -:.c ...... T!SM.,I.."BE IN D.14B 16,2012 D,NC 19 is 1 CLASS I NIP__ ACcoqoANcE*IF,NrI/XT N/DOT 3733 NPE 5 N 1—TEXT, N SPEC.2511 LE WTI 2 NINI­ 1220700 EN1l PRIVIECUS G1TIE1— yii ETL JE:Ll= ��.,ET MN/ DoT"LTE wm Do RIP RAP VIEW R".D11 —1 L II-INC.CS 11LICI .............. TO A ,I ITANCARD PROCTOR NANULAN MR. 1�3 NOSE—DOWN CURB SECTION DENS II-PI-1 IOLL PER III/—I'll SIT", CS.O NOT 0 SEAL �8 LIGHT DUTY 1 15 CURB OPENING FOR DRAINAGE SWALE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT io,3 \Ca_�U 4 THRUST BLOCK DETAIL FOR WATER PIPE BENDS C5.0 CLASS 5 AGDREGTE DO01 CRUSHEDI. WfARINC COURSE vER PER 4N/DOT Jr b.C ACFEO TO AT AM"25"IO Oa.UNAWGH ST52'?5 INC. MN/DDT 3360 MNYE LUST 1001 STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITr. - .e AORATE ONASLA5CPBCNPEREOKD EWA aBEE51 NU4BEa5WL[FOR DRAIN X11=111_ll� �I������I�I��II�III_i � •--III•s.11l III 111_111•=11 � ...c_ _ i ! WC VARIES ,SIR PIPE SEE COMPACTED FILL 1—I AND ' r RECOMPACT SUBGRADf _...... r0 1001 vROCTOR axsrTY. - 1 POPE ASSOCIATES DRIVE 7 BITUMINOUS PATH ' „ 1 Sr. MNss!asue Ius ENERGY PAUL PN.(651)ulAioo C5.1 N FAx woA ioi 90 BEND ........... SaV J5 M OaNNALE vrRE SEE STONIN SEWER tABL . PWN FOR NMERTS. -1. SLOPES.AND SIZE U MARANATHA 11 TYPICAL YARD DRAIN INLET PIPE cs.1 N A SKILLED CARE BROOKLYN DAP eDGN .E,.::;. . mi- CENTER, MN SLOPE VARIES + 307 zzo .. BKBM P »� ....._......................................._....... ............._._ ...._......- "'°° MG of FREE DaNNAGE _ 1 / S 1 FLARED-END SECTION AGCREG E NO IQ SEAL ♦ DVAIETER DRNN FILE ,...., WITH OUTLET TO GMDE I PPE 3 FEET CN EACH SIDE. OvF.RLAP ... _ s r rHGN Dour H♦D -I � —III—III—III— J DaoA4 aP6 NSUU a*ourERS ON �7 z�I 6"4MMU4 COMPACTED fi GRATRULART BASE UTILITY FIRE Lfl2LWL PAp ;. 3 12 TYPICAL 3.5' MAX HEIGHT RETAINING WALL W tt4A G .1 NO AL 0 S 104 — AN S ND 8 WATER MAIN INSULATION cs.t � 0 -1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1TI-1 I ITN-1 I I1TII� P E R M I T —1 I— ICI-II,III 11111111111;111- — SUBMITTAL ' U GRADE SOILS FIITRATgxT :. I. 50 601 SANG AST4 RNN CNNDEN - 3o 601"'0 A 4 UTILITY PIPE INSULATION ID Jot CU.& VATS 'I @ 4db 1 G5.1 NOT TO SCALE I P SEE PLW FOR PROPOSED CLEVAIpN ) 22,. NG _ - ! s R 1 TYPICAL PIPE BEDDING uUBGRAGE ED �—IZ WN. I POST ro C5.1 N 0 sCAL T BO Nc5 ND Arco sA SANDY I Cols CAAOE ,ry Wa yL N OLS ARE BTIIED TErza' aETiau»+ I (j } cUB�RADE TED DEPTH OF SOILS AID LONTAG,CIL EMGNEEN .1� NL O 4N i.1rE STATUTE�s WHiN LEGEND AID IN _ 1u 1 RERECTORQ D COAXES WDEITI PRIOR TO LPLACEMENT4 OFF SANDY OASEFE 41 TTNO NO NF­ION OON THROMNUALOCO m TTAC 6" 3'V�ACCESSIBLE" FINCS,L SEED WTW Mx/COL JIOR ��~ 1 CGN i00 ro5r IF ttIUBLE SEED M,AT AA VIE CE AN vER CRE ESS GA svEL TTEO aTHERW SE BY OSCAPE ANCHTELT STEEL SIGN POST AIR MMVERED INTO o UN s t RAIN o GARDEN CROSS SECTION O 04 � _o41NLRADE CIVL DETAILS A A I—I Sd RIvisiwaPO'T DAM'ETER CONE E`NCH OARSTF RRlZO M 9 W 7 PUO S hnY W-MePh 1S?O7? FOR CONCRETEMIK RIPRAP REQUIREMENTS CM BLd SWN SN1MdW-A1srh 29.2072 Pens S1NnMON•Apr110.2012 IL DEPTH DEP...........::.::......_-_..............................::..:.:..... ......:..............._............................................... b RWND W L cuss a cuss ul PmE Prml Suhmitlal-ADr1192012 13 STORM MANHOLE ros a�ro.I oxa cI-I 1 NO SEAL Peml Sldndhl•MM 192012 ( 6s 5 1 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN AND POST 1. - 1 NOT TO SCALE 31 BA I _ O ♦.z 6.J PLAN z ss aJ 1) B.5 I B.o I z s.a e.;1 111 31 POINT ,Jis A 3.J G.B POINT I MUST POINT A MINIMUM OF 6 Rlv-a SEE NOTE I J-5 l B"-10"OIA. HIGHER IRAN POINT 2 TO ENSURE DoMN5P0uT OaivfF 0 b III AND WATER AROUND OVER THE DIKE AND NOT AROUND THE ENDS. AN =III=111.1 T! NRab/adAy9dle pn aEdAOtlana wDd ' SEE NoI FILTER 91ANNEr IEWJ PePe�Ey e6nude my 6ledr!peNiim SEE NOTES}WO or 'ET POINT. �, z" SECTION A-A uBwt IhB.IIyUmRO!IP!D6 DhL 'i' 1 udatr WS dIr EYYdLinwoY. �, 'y 1" x 1" STAKE > SEE NOSE r �I'aE / / �DBIwM-T SMNUTAR ALTER BUNRET FOn PPES GR ITER THAN 3o US T'E. Oal LTA Y16.2012 LK.NO. 19181 \ W.U.W - EE rE5 3 NNO J 3 SVBSTTuTE ArGEO L o r / .._SECTION B-B orHffANUIUs N./DOT TR BLANIEifiun�'S'oNS. — _-1220700 \. LQINT J.wLU4ES o�=.LLAlI HircRGS-TL BE Noll If ETL \ I/z THE E I)AN o<a aP RAn AT ANY ( ti \ PRECAST CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCK RIF- PPEOL.1 uKldel �wnn ♦.RP RAP SHAL BE PIADED x ___.. _...._ 1 NO 0 SCALE AccoxwxcE WrH u"/WT SPEC 3 2 RIPRAP AT FLARED ENDS ROOF DRAIN OUTLETS 9 8!oROLL PER - 213 MNDOT 3089. __. _._._ .___. •.-..-_.. _ ...._..._.._._ rvcE 3 C/-el 14 SS 10 SEWER CLEANOUT IN PERVIOUS AREA C5.1 NOT TD To CAL CSI i No o SCALE 865 865 —._ ._._.. POPE AssocmTEs Inc ENERGY PARK DRIVE _ __ ST.PAU4 MNssia-mn ... 91�o _ PN teen in Circular RCP FAX(,sp uwm 54.00ft 12.0 860 860 MARANATHA _ _ SKILLED CARE BROOKLYN _ CENTER, MN =INSULATION AT CULVERT CROSSING 855 Q 1.0.00 in PVC EL 854.89 85 _ BKBM 850 1850 —0+50 0+00 0+50 1 +00 1 +50 2+00 1 12- DRIVEWAY CULVERT CROSSING PERMIT SUBMITTAL 865 R0�1,1 865 i I GAS, I i GC 860 GAS. 9 „0 860 CULVERT CIVL DETAILS loos ad Rvisiaa'. INSULATION NK 1 m. aMPUD%@m -wChljM2 O CMnd 5W1e SuNpO ftch 23.2014 Pend S,&Tffiw-Ap110.20,2 83 ft 10.00in PowNa SuWeel-A;xjl_% ,2 855 PVG @ 0.52 855 PeMIS�IMhI-Me,62o,2 -- CENTERLINE OF — 9TH AVENUE --- ', •eMemh O.rie a•44siewl 850 850 -PeP•��e.e rd htlm sdulY lNreM PiakeWWFJgMer —1 +00 —0+50 0+00 0+50 1 +00 1450 weeew,a+.ararwwes. f°1 Joel W.Mater 2 PROFILE OF SANITARY SEWER IN ROW Dale(Vav 16,2012 (w.No 19181 r u c.m.k 12207u0 o -- --—ET( lldi b _..___.. _JWM SHPEI C5.2 69TH APEWE NORTH ..•' � - .. �. 697H AVEACE AbA7H j a �'�. 1 sEU c •' r : POPE Ass IAT INC. 50' 25' 0 50' 100 - j N r� - ISSs ENERGY PARK DRIVE S7.PAUL,MN s51os 5 n SCALE 1"=50' D V — PH.(651)W292DO H �i' I — 1 +, FAx c'' " MARA ATHA 4. <» — �. /A\ SKILLED CARE BROOKLYN '. 9 � Cp C9•z rs t r .y r CENTER MN 3 . � BKBM I I �w ... a -.u1.T .1n r s ,.s 3 4 PERMIT 4 A yy 4 a• �— r SUBMITTAL I ' a[ -` E 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS Il F U" 11 - F( Fli .. PRELIMINARY STORM WATER POLLUTION s. r r PREVENTION PLAN r 3 3 ........................ . .. E ... t - (SWPPP) f r l a '+t a : - f IW IL F.'TI:>.rl tU - I`1FL'PS1_� ':,:' _F _ --- - .c >>r.,, -- Renrft and PUD SubdU-MerOl 1SA12 __ ,a_- R ,, v .............................. - -._ ..______- ------ arq Sta SfERi AvO 2012 ................... R4:a;:':.?N:...-, u yr��•rR .'E1c�.: I < .:eF :•,1•z v..::, — ..... 1, xvT :. _ °�;:,aEr. ,� rw u:F+c) 1 pr 516niW1-M119 2012 .__t ..... _ -. Pern11 S[bOnel-MeC 18 2012 ................. _. _.. ....... 111 ................ ... ......................... rrE < FE rfu C9 H Ave N \ `ik'. 69TH Ave N r E r 1 ,�Cti•f rt _wE-- .aE. as ,E ..t. [u_ wE Iheeb•celif,by Cie dan, a� g - .cc. 2 r„ En Rr i EE [,1 1rry E r a aee pepero0tyrrercuger my bed m7�'Aam N ...f•. :.t C .,.. - w .-_ _. ....wL:r R.r_�N. xJ c-.n,a.� ., w. ER REt J :.EV'f ip F f NF-R. Wtlr Il d*tlmrmN HOfanionl Ela)rles .: .1 [: E _ f Lin C JF'E 'E E. E p:Eer EIB W.O}NIB ebb 0I Mlaacda. :w • p s. z v.w- F,r,,.. ueE 1 :,.<, fi..Fa_if1 r-:r..1. <P �x .. E 1+( . R ..., J f EE . . . . E[ f..: {C{/ �. �rra('.(,cF•(..,... ri> D...s 3E k '9EE ,F.iE r wE ,r PF i E R f ce pT 2:_ - nc ^E < s.;S.cE CR .. E J. r E F .t6lUa'16,2�t21 W.Aa LIC.ND. 19I8f µ: 'ewr .r r - Tc wn u 12207 DO a - kn eu d ETL Jwm r r„.. SHEET - _:� -••,'. _ >aw mn k„ . aik -._ m F c fo Fx .aF,,N r D L ` 3 rBRKl,Y,V NSER Planning Commission Report Application Filed on 04/09/12 Meeting Date: May 31, 2012 City Council action should be taken by 06/08/12 (60 Days) Application No. 2012-007 Applicant: Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home, Inc. Location: 5401& 5415 — 69th Avenue North Request: Preliminary and Final Plat for Maranatha 2"d Addition INTRODUCTION Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, Inc. (PHS), acting on behalf of Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home, Inc., is seeking Preliminary Plat and Final Plat approval to replat two existing lots into one, large single lot for their Maranatha Homes senior apartment and nursing care campus, located at 5401 and 5415 69th Avenue North. A public hearing was originally scheduled for the May 17, 2012 meeting, with notices mailed to the surrounding property owners. This item was tabled to this May 31" meeting, with the acknowledgement the public hearing would be continued on this same date. ANALYSIS The Maranatha campus consists of two separate lots. The nursing home parcel (addressed as 5401 — 691h Ave.) is 3.78 acres in size and is situated in the R1 district. The existing 64-unit senior assisted living facility (5415 — 69th Ave.) is 3.28 acres in size and situated in the R6 district. The combined area of these sites is 7.06 acres. These two centers are owned and operated jointly by PHS. The senior assisted living apartments were created in 1987 by the filing of a new plat (Maranatha Addition) and rezoning from RI (One Family) to R6 (Multiple Family Residence). The four- story, 65 unit apartment was completed in 1988. The subject site is surrounded by R3—Multiple Family Residence to the north, known as The Ponds/Mallard Creek Townhome development; R1-One Family Residence to the northeast, east and south; and a large, multi-family apartment complex to the west, which is located in the City of Brooklyn Park. Sewer and water are both available from 69th Avenue. The proposed new nursing home facility will have separate water and sewer line connections made if the PUD Rezoning and future Site Plan are approved for this improvement. The preliminary plat illustrates a number of perimeter drainage and utility easements, which are typical of these types of replats. Other existing easements are scheduled to be vacated or PC 05-17-12 Page 1 of 2 X tr of K[YN NTF R released on this site, but not until all other easements necessary for the is overall PUD site improvements have been determined. Most of these easements have been reviewed by the City Engineer and found to be acceptable at this time, with minor modifications allowed to be made prior to the City releasing the final plat for recording. The new final plat will reflect a new Lot 1, Block 1, Maranatha 2nd Addition. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2012-11, which comprehends the approval of Planning AXplication No. 2012-007, which proposes a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for MARANATHA 2 ° ADDITION, subject to the following conditions: 1. All recommendations and conditions as noted in the City Engineer's review memorandum, dated May 25, 2012 (and those related to the PUD Development/Site and Building Plan review memo of April 9, 2012) shall be complied with or completed as part of any final plat approvals; 2. Any easements to be vacated under this platting process must be considered under separate and formal City easement vacation process, with all documentations, descriptions, and exhibits singed by a licensed surveyor; 3. The final plat shall be subject to review and final approvals by the City Engineer, prior to release by the City for recording purposes. 4. The final plat shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 5. No building permits shall be issued for any new buildings until the final plat has been given final approval by the City Council and filed with Hennepin County. 6. If required or asked for by the City, an updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Attorney and City Engineer for review at the time of the final plat application (within 30 days of release of the final plat). ATTACHMENTS • Aerial/Location Maps • Preliminary Plat of Maranatha 2"d Addn. • Final Plat Map of Maranatha 2"d Addn. • City Engineer's Review Memo(dated 05/25/2012) • Planning Commission Resolution No.2012-11 PC 05-17-12 Page 2 of 2 Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-11 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-007, SUBMITTED BY MARANATHA CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST HOME, INC., A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT APPROVALS OF MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5401-5415 — 69TH AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012-007 submitted by Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, Inc. (PHS), acting on behalf of Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home, Inc., requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat approvals of a subdivision to be titled MARANATHA 2nd ADDITION, which is a replat of two contiguous lots generally located and addressed as 5401 and 5415 691h Avenue North (Subject Site); and WHEREAS,this plat is requested to combine two separate lots into a single lot for the overall benefit of the Maranatha Care Center campus, located on the Subject Site; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission initially held a duly called public hearing on May 17, 2012, whereby this matter was tabled to the May 31, 2012 meeting; and WHEREAS, at the May 31, 2012 meeting, the Planning Commission reconsidered this matter, at which time a staff report was presented, and the public hearing was reopened to allow for public testimony regarding the preliminary plat of MARANATHA 2nd ADDITION,were received; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has determined during its review of the preliminary plat and final plat materials submitted with Planning Application No. 2012-007,that said plat is in general conformance with City of Brooklyn Center's City Code Chapter 15 — Platting; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2012-007 as submitted by Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, Inc. (PHS), acting on behalf of Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home, Inc., requesting Preliminary Plat and Final Plat consideration of a new subdivision to be titled MARANATHA 2❑d ADDITION,be approved based upon the following conditions: 1. All recommendations and conditions as noted in t he City Engineer's review memorandum, dated May 25, 2012 (and those related to the PUD Development/Site and Building Plan review memo of April 9, 2012) shall be complied with or completed as part of any final plat approvals; 2. Any easements to be vacated under this platting process must be considered under separate and formal City easement vacation process, with all documentations, descriptions, and exhibits singed by a licensed surveyor; 3. The final plat shall be subject to review and final approvals by the City Engineer, prior to release by the City for recording purposes. 4. The final plat shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 5. No building permits shall be issued for any new buildings until the final plat has been given final approval by the City Council and filed with Hennepin County. 6. If required or asked for by the City, and updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Attorney and City Engineer for review at the time of the final plat application (within 30 days of release of the final plat). May 31, 2012 Date Chair ATTEST: Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Chair , Commissioners and the following voted against the same: . Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. MEMORANDUM DATE: May 25, 2012 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor Steven L. Lillehaug, City Engineer/Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Public Works—Revised Preliminary and Final Plat Review for MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION Public Works Department staff reviewed the preliminary plat and final plat submittals dated May 16, 2012, for the proposed MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION and provide the following revised recommendations: General: 1. All recommendations and requirements indicated in the April 9, 2012, PUD and Site Plan review memorandum from Public Works are included by reference. 2. An easement vacation is required as part of this redevelopment. The formal vacation document must contain an easement vacation description and depiction exhibit signed by a professional surveyor. 3. The City has record of easement number 3211239 on file. The developer must confirm the status of this easement. If it has not already been vacated, it must be vacated as part of this development. 4. Proof of parking has been demonstrated; however, the proof of parking layout must be revised to demonstrate a more realistic parking lot plan if it were needed to be built. 5. The easterly access for 691h Avenue must be aligned with the parking lot drive aisle. 6. The measured snapshot of parking reported was 90 vehicles during a routine shift change period under the existing site scenario. The parking study identified that the ITE parking demand numbers provide a better representation of the existing parking needs than do the City's requirements; however, the ITE projected demand is only 61. Therefore,the ITE projections in this scenario are significantly underestimated and should not be relied upon to base parking needs for this sight. If deviations from City ordinance are considered,the required parking should be based on actual studies and should include a factor of safety for those periods and events that might exceed the everyday normal situation. At a minimum without further information and without viable alternatives to overflow parking, I recommend constructing the proposed Phase 1 parking(104 parking stalls) plus an additional 28 stalls that could be constructed in the proof of parking areas in the northwest area and in the northeast area. Additionally, if issues were to develop anytime in the future, the developer would be required to construct the full amount of required parking stalls. 7. Provide connections of internal sidewalks to public regional trail/sidewalk along 69`h Avenue. 8. Preserve or replace sidewalk on the northwest side of the existing 64 unit facility if the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat Review Memo— Maranatha 2nd Addition Page 2 May 25, 2012 proposed proof of parking area is implemented. This may require a reduced number of proposed parking spots available in this area. Preliminary Plat: 9. Show the total acreage on the plat. 10. Show the name and address of the subdivider. 11. Show the existing zoning on the site. 12. Show any proposed zoning changes. 13. Show the plat adjoining the west property line. Final Plat: 14. Provide a working drawing of the final plat with all proposed easements that includes an overlay of all ponds, all utilities(private and public, proposed and existing) and grading elevations for the City to use to verify adequacy. The drainage easements must encompass the ponds, overflow areas, and channels at or above the determined individual 100-yr flood elevations for those elements and areas. Prior to Issuance of Land Alteration and Building Permits: 15. Submit a recorded copy of the restrictive covenants (subdivision agreement). 16. Submit final site plans and specifications for review and approval by the City Engineer in form and format as determined by the City. The final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan. 17. Submit a letter of credit or cash escrow for the land disturbance portion of the project in the amount of 150%of the estimated cost or in the amount determined by City staff to comply with the land alteration permit, site improvements and to restore the site. The developer may submit one itemized letter of credit, if approved by City staff. The City will not release or reduce the letter of credit or cash escrow until work has been completed according to the final site plans approved by the City. 18. A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions,traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions, tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility provisions, temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non- compliance provisions. The plan must be in a City approved format and must outline minimum site management practices and penalties for non-compliance. 19. Submit a$5,000 separate cash escrow for the construction management plan elements as part of the non-compliance provision. This escrow must be accompanied by the agreement and signed by the developer and property owner. Through this document, the developer and property owner will acknowledge: a. The property will be brought into compliance within 24 hours of notification of a violation of the construction management plan, other conditions of approval or City code standards. b. If compliance is not achieved, the City will use any or all of the escrow dollars to correct any deficiency and/or issue. 20. Schedule and hold a preconstruction meeting with the City staff. Preliminary Plat and Final Plat Review Memo—Maranatha 2nd Addition Page 3 May 25, 2012 All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. The preliminary plan (site plan and preliminary plat) and final plat must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions above. Subsequent approval of the final plat may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading, geometric design and other design elements as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. I I Hennepin County Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive 612-596-0300,Phone ti Medina,MN 55340-5421 763-478-4000,FAX 763-478-4030,TDD www.hennepin.us Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor May 22, 2012 City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 Re: Preliminary Plat Review—Maranantha 2 n Addition Residential Care Facility 69th Avenue North(CSAH 130) at Unity Avenue Hennepin County Plat Review No. 3242 Dear Mr. Johnson: Minnesota Statutes 505.02, 505.03, and 462.358, Plats and Surveys, allow up to 30 days for county review of preliminary plats abutting county roads. This residential development was reviewed by the Plat Review Committee on May 1, 2012. It should be noted that 69`h Avenue North (CSAH 130) is a collector street, and hence it has fewer significant concerns than a typical county minor arterial roadway. The road is on the county list of potential road turnbacks to the city for future discussion, and this has previously been acknowledged by city staff. Right-of-way—there is no additional right-of-way dedication requested on this roadway. Driveway access—no change in site access is being proposed. Traffic Impacts—this project is anticipated to have fairly minimal traffic impacts. Permits— Please inform the property owner(s) that all proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping / streetscaping. Permit questions can be directed to Carolyn Fackler at (612) 596-0336 or caro lyn.fackler6co.hennepin.mn.us . Please contact Bob Byers at (612) 596-0354 or robert.byers(a)co.hennepin.mn.us for any further discussion of these items. Sincerely, James N. Grube, P.E. Director of Transportation and County Engineer JNG/rqb cc: Plat Review Committee Mark Larson,l lennepin Count;Survey Office MARANA THA 2ND ADD/T/ON C.R. ooc. No. /v//L_L_C_�S. r / / r- A/ n 14/// / nIA/ / A A/F- KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home, a Minnesota corporation, owner and proprietor of the following described / r7 r V /v U ., YYIL.L_VYY L--II vL_ property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: 60 'J n/n Ann/r//'1 A/ Lots I &2, Block I, MARANATHA ADDITION N Hove caused the some to be surveyed and platted as MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION and do hereby dedicate to the public, for public use forever, the drainoge and 'i.n�r - 1 caner, utility easements as shown on said plat.CIF SIM 3 I/4 CLW9,R E. l ✓ I'v. i Ji .SEG.T31 TOP.119,Rr£?/ < a M M -(FUND/�NNEP/N COUNTY "1 n In witness whereof said Moranatha Conservative Baptist Home has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 589 3730 20— �srNGw.Mnvuw-A/r) 21111114 /�� - � p, jji O 119, /z4 / �Or// Ai IC-A///C- A/n)r, I ',vuq�ST R OF r Moranatha Conservative Baptist Home SWC ,.../r7 nv�/vVL_ lvvf,/r7 sc3cxrN>on9RCE.2l- ` n °a -t (FUND N MAMOLE LOVER) S89 5350E 49980 — SIGNED: its o_ 176.55 49.5a STATE OF MINNESOTA o -----r--T----I— ------- ---- i_ --- — ------- _ --------- COUNTY OF L DRAINAGE!U1ILITV EASEMENT-�" URN �•c DRAINAGE E1_/ 589'S3'SO"E 5752E -'\•, T' 110 The foregoing instrument was°of nsawd MaranathaeConaerwttve Baptista Home, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of said corporation. the 21.18 DNS �_h $ 589'53'S0'E ai z Notory Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires .1, Mark S. Hanson, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of <> Minnesota; that this plot is o correct representation of the boundary survey, that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on the plot; that all monuments depicted on the plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year, that all water boundaries and wet lands as defined in Minnesota Statutes, > Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate ore shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plot. 14.98 38-14-E � Dated this day of 20- A n n / T / n A / /—I L/ L-1 / / / L/ / V n I Mork S. Hanson, Licensed Land Surveyor n i I I Minnesota License No. 15480 v 7,) STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of - 20_, by Mark S. Hanson. L I L O T o I = I , y I I Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires m BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA > J I I 4 I I I This plat of MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of _ 20__. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as J• provided by Minn. Statutes, Section 505.03. Subd. 2. /J I BLOCK I I ?i CITY COUNCIL OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA A > BY:_ Mayor BY:_ Manager O� TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Hennepin County, Minnesota A I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20_and prior years have been paid for land described on this Plat, dated this day of yw \ 20— I • I I r z I I �� Mark V. Chapin, Hennepin County Auditor BY:_ Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota IA $ I I Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sec. 3838.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this day of 20_ Ii,A r, --------- I i + 1'•� C� William P. Brown, Hennepin County Surveyor BY: �r n W - g$I COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, Minnesota zi a I '�' _ I hereby certify that the within plat of MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION was filed in this office this day of 20_at o'clock Ii;l ! ,Mai�ry 1,,`z off", rI I —M. ••_,� Iii I I •. "t. N86"31'32 i 1 rn 40.98 +t /" t �= •.=• County Martin McCormick, Im . nt R ecorder BY: Deputy 540'42'3°"W 1J; '4in I o I It 1 Y Neb'36'�4'E 204.57 �.;a'Py DRAINAGE 586'32'OB'W N62 16 .0 /8,y 1' i EASEM ENT-' q •6 epr 1 I • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND, MARKED aep WITH RLS 15480, UNLESS OTHERWISE \�$ NBM00'20 E 133.31 J M a �'�S��-/r�'�• 110 SHOWN. 7' N00'05'54"E r N ) 32.36 _- ________: I Se8'00'2o"w 133.36 No3'sl'15.03 --- FOR THE PU2POSE5 OF THIS PLAT, THE L-- _-- 15.03 _ T I T SEC TW 119 ------ -------T----•.• ,', 107.12 NORTH LINE OF HE 33, P. sz6'IZ'oa'E DRAINAGE a urltlTr EASEMENT-=; _ �— ———o RGE. 21 IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING n 6e.64 - %^25.78 - 72.45 OF S89'53'50"E. N89 54'05"W 501.01 "L/;v;v�;-..' L ftl�v; r'_I;AV/ ,Ft vt-;v/.� .r/�� iivv;//V;v/ 40 0 40 60 JISUNDE I SCALE IN FEEI LAND SURVEYING A A// / r- T L �� , V /V L/ .� 14", / /l1A/ / AAll YY/L_L_VYY L-1-11 11/') r,r �� 60 -� �Jn/n A nn/r/nn/ VL/ nL./Li///v/v NORTHEAST CORNER OF SEC JA rw..I/9, NORTH 114 CORNER OF O I�7.v..� A.11. All 11, al_ R1F.2/(FOND N✓ SEC..31 TrP.//9"RGE2l i 1 t - �r—� MAAr/OLE CDVER) (FOUVO NENNER'N L171NTY .-I T u N I N o u■ Sgq J7091 CAST IRON MCYVLB/ENT) - 262114 A - NCR BITUMINOUS �R W LAVE OF TAE NE 114 IAA• l e1TUYIxD 8 RGE.21 n du 0 138.35 - A o ————j DRAINAGE k UTI EASEMEN LITY ———— QONOS [ ({.;� / •'� ke ITU HINDU! 206.01 rAU IS ! / 'IrW ; DRAINAGE 589'53'50'E S l "eNT••.• $o g o EASEMENT ZB' .0 1 I T yM I 0 I _- 21.1 9• '50'E r0 I / a agw I ;� „A A 'n A /7/ A v �1 � DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lots I &2, Block I, MARANATHA ADDITION T / n / N.4IE-S 14.96 L/ / / / v I ]� Existing onditions shown as shaded line work. -N86' / ---- `- I ( 9 nj TOP!F TRE OWN Ifl, SS0 ILNY A09RR W ( •LP' �( I° a. I CJ IFT A r----- -I _ �' r DUB! �I VICINITY MAP e IT UN I N I b r k I... • �'iP 9 1 1 `1 —OMM14W II I r u NO SCALE IN •rjQ1NYN W V V 89TH AVE ri ` -?.BR --- V� _q 1F C1 DaaclE I �1 ' DDNaER L� • 1 1 A AV tab pp I •ITUIIINDu! 1 \ O \ I -1 g I I I I Tppi 1 I 1 a ( I I I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was 1 i 1 1 ---- r'''!'v �.• Ao o'ul I prepared by me or under my direct supervision and d* II that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the Ne6'31'32'E' ,�'(�' laws of the State of Minnesota. 40.98 _ 1 I - µl1 I o W Dated this 16th day of May, 2012. 1 - uQ I /j n Y L� So SUNDE L DL D SG, L CL C. 540'4q'-2.W 1, l I5 elTUx,NOU! �I� t' 2.72`•••;\-' g^�•.. I BY � NBg'38'14'E Mork S. Hanson, P.L.S. Minn. Lic. No. 204.5 15480 _- 4200 sip. DRAINAGE .C4 S88'32' 'w N82 18 .0 ''" /,a \ EASEMENT`:,•.• 'l4 � /g.3 O2� �'r~ 9 -41D 1py,4• \ NBB'00_20'E 133_31 _\ wok $\S%/C1 110 I 'v{,'r4.• 1�,• N00'05'54'E ,gar N. eNSkn to aj..•• L l' 588 00'2D'W 133.36 NO3'21 48'W_ �•--_____" ° L-_- TB ECS________ ______—T 15.03 LYDxh9 T/t/r F \`•.,_26.12-0e'E — �-__ 1D7.1s _ PP&IM/NARY g -8&84 Z DRAINAGE!UTILITY EASEMENT o y 3 PLAT F�' N89 5725•W 501.01 AMANATNANMDADD/T/ON [N89 54 05-W] n/1 A/A/A l A , --A C:- I A n n JJSUNDE-1 ED. N.�.n-Frr••o3 35r).SUH.118 /! L BIDOmUplon,MV„eratD 55420--%it UVI V l V/-1/ \VV/\ C_l 1 V \7/-'I/\L,L_/Vim.: �./l /-1UL/l l/1./V 852-881-2455(Fac 952-688-9528) I LAND SU[VEYM 0 40 80 www.•I..a..oD,n !!! Rro L70/7-0/5-A B" -.593.78 Dote: 05/D 70/7 SCALE IN FEET TDxNM 019 Rm 2/ SectAtn:JJ Y7a-20/mlSIDOI-RPEAT.dIy ��t, I Of 1 City of Business and Development Brookl n Center— Department www.cityof brooklyncenter.org 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway,Brooklyn Center,Minnesota 55430-2199 Phone 763.569.3300 TTYNoice 711 Fax 763.569.3494 MEMORANDUM TO: Chair Sean Rahn and Planning Commissioners FROM: Gary Eitel, Business & Development Director Tim Benetti, Planning & Zoning Specialist CC: Steve Lillehaug, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: May 25, 2012 RE: 3`d Generation Plan- Watershed Management Planning—SECOND PRESENTATION May 31, 2012 Planning Commission Agenda Item No. 6.a Ed Matthiessen and Diane Spector with Wenck Engineers, representing the Shingle Creek/West Mississippi Watershed Commissions are scheduled to provide an updated presentation before the City Planning Commission and members of the City's Park and Recreation Commission, regarding the updates to the proposed 3`d Generation Plan. Also attached to this memo is a copy of the PowerPoint presentation. The entire Planning Commission and members of the Park Commission have volunteered to serve as the City's Citizen Advisory Committee to the watersheds. This meeting will provide an opportunity to discuss our City's input into this plan and help prioritize implementation activities. Representatives from the watersheds will be at the meeting Thursday night to field any questions, concerns or comments you may have on this new 3`d Generation Plan. Please note there is no official action to be taken or public hearing on this item. If you have any questions or comments prior to the meeting, feel free to call Gary at (763) 569-3305 / GEitel(c ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us; or Tim at(763) 569-3319 /TBeiietti.(a),ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us; or City Engineer Steve Lillehaug at(763) 569-3340/Lillehaug(a),ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us. Meeting Purpose Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Review the proposed Implementation Plan activities Management • • - Development Rules and Standards Monitoring Program Third Generation Watershed G Education and Outreach Program Management Plan ��,� Shin ':�reek - Capital Projects CAC Meetin g -2 Implementation P r4yrti "PSf;/V(rSSiSS�i J Rules and Standards • Rate of stormwater runoff cannot increase. " `�, a 4' t '� • Runoff must be treated to remove at least 6o% of total phosphorus and 85% of sediment. • The first 1/2 inch of runoff must be infiltrated on site, such as in rain gardens, bioinfiltration basins, swales, or capture and reuse. • Wetlands and flood plains are protected. . - � P P New Development Requirements Redevelopment Requirements • Current Rules apply to any development project • Current Rules: meet water quality and on sites greater than 5 acres; single family infiltration requirements only for new residential threshold is 15 acres impervious surface Proposed Rules apply to any development - Proposed Rules: any redevelopment project on sites greater than one acre impacting more than 50% of the site must meet all the same rules as new development e Proposed Rules: any redevelopment impacting less than 50% of the site must meet the same rules for the entire redeveloped area Increased Infiltration Requirement Proposed New Infiltration Credit • Currently must infiltrate • Get credit towards infiltration requirement 1/2 inch of runoff within 9 Provide soil management in turfed areas on site 48 hours . • Proposed new standard is �:� • Decompact soil to 12" in depth one inch of runoff in 48 ° - • Amend top 8 hours • Exceptions for clay soils, areas with soil contamination, or w `� . wellhead protection areas B;o;nfiltrattonswale,Brooklyn Center i I i Monitoring Program To quantify the current status of streams and lakes throughout the watersheds in comparison to state water quality standards. To quantify changes over time, or trends, in stream got I and lake water quality. To quantify the effectiveness of implemented BMPs throughout the watersheds for the protection of water quality. To document progress toward meeting pollutant load reduction requirements �hingle CreektWest Mississippi 2011 Monitored Discharge Monitoring Locations Monitoring Sites 600 • Lak<4wnpk Sites 500 54em Sampk Sibs SC-3 Shingle Creek at Brooklyn Blvd *w.mne Mo rco np N Sampled 2007—Present ,� 400 j ,* SC-2 Sampled 1996-20o6 300 Approx. 11,000 acres drainage 200 19 kn ess.a__i to Q -.`Cedar•�. �SC3 y (sand-•' Zj 5 2�.!�-1 ; USGS Station 100 - �+ e 9/e 1%,.s; -10 Shingle Creek at Queen Ave / Sampled 1996—Present 0 Ma qda 1/1/2011 3/2/2011 5/2/2011 7/2/2011 9/1/2011 10/31/2011 12/31/2011 L ,�► �r —..`t ;Bass — •.[,. Upper r `yMeadow Twln _ Date L. .. 1 S 1 9%G SC-o �Pomedeau--iI M/ddle .VC •e twin cyan Ih SC-3(BrcoMynBlvd) —USGS(Queen Ave) SC-0(Outlet) Shingle Creek at 45 Ave Lowert.. Sonmld: iw,n .,,°, o,. ;� Sampled 2001—Present i t 9k6•p yslal Approx.26,000 acre drainage SC-0 Chloride Water Quality 111 111 :11 ------� :11 Water quality in Shingle Creek is typical of urban ---.--, streams in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. •11 611 ...�--, X11 . . X11 Shingle and Bass Creeks are currently listed as impaired for chloride, DO and lack of fish and macroinvertebrates. Will be listed in 2014 Eliza,. coli. Shingle Creek may ' 1 1 1 04/02/11 06/02/11 08/02/11 10/02/11 ' also be considered in the future for TSS and nutrients (TP). —Flow Date Chloride Standard(chronic) I,.,-,----Chloride Standard(maximum) m Chloride(Grab) AL Chloride(storm) LaKe Longitudinal /O Surveys Monitoring Longitudinal Dissolved Oxygen Survey Bass Creek and Shingle Creek % (August 16,2007) 11111111 TMDL Oissol�d Oxygen Stend,nd 111 Cedo -T '1'111 . 11111111,111111111 1"1111 ►• ��1111111111�0e�11 111111 � - , � 11�1�1111 �111�11 �111111111�1111111 ����111 = 6 00 am 11111111111111 1111�i11 N L 111111111111111111111111111 _ _ Total Phosphorus.Bus Lake Total Phosphorus,Schmidt Lakc Lake Monitoring r €r 140 go i. k 120 80 s` 100 e • ---- y A 80 � ao --.----- • Volunteer monitoring �° <0 20 through Citizen Assisted ' 20 10 Lake Monitoring Program 01980 ?985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 -__- Proposed. in Third }.. Total Phosph•.us.kko Po Tmo Lake Generation Plan. Total Phosphorus,Crystal Lake ■. [ ,: .100 • More intensive water + a' 550 qualit'; monitorinb ��,_ 3 00 . '^- 250 • Aquatic vegetation r .� x'. 200 • 0 ; .� . survey's �_ >_ ,#� . U ,°° a e • Sediment coring - 50 ° . r i' .-v ',:... •:" 1985 1990 1595 2000 200' 2010 Schmidt Lake,Plymouth Macroinvertebrate/Fish Monitoring Wetland Monitoring • Commission monitors fish/bugs every 5 years ' • Wetland Health Evaluation Program River Watch Volunteer Monitoring Adult voluideers inunitor veuetation and macroinvertebrates (bugs) in wetlands ° High school students y: 3 locations on Shingle Creek 1 location on Mattson Brook Ilk• a' Education and Outreach Programming F' -� • Sponsor volunteer events • Participate in education fairs r • Provide classroom education l Ili New Program - "Green Yard" Other Education and Outreach Still - . 1 • What things would you like the Commissions to take on? Individual stormwater management plan Reduce and pesticide use Increase Improve turf maintenance Use native FA abf.aes� Cwmihs...iMw 6h.Cyy e vegetation C- A11 Rsvyrbn W,nM.op• m t � .r Intensive BMP Studies Urban Stormwater Planning for BM's BMPs Retrofit Practices K Appendices Detailed analysis by any �;- - -• } . subwatershed , . . .ti _ , • ID cost-effective BMPs ., x _ _ neighborhood or _- ., ,, - t 1 on a e r " •�- • Stormwater Retrofit Protocol-Metro Conservation Districts C:t.NT eR eon - PROTECTION r i �r a � �t•a1! a : .� Capital Projects TMDLs identified several capital projects .y i`ti1 • ts. L a , t , rs♦ RL: �r l: i �� Cities incorporate projects into their own capital improvement program, street reconstruction program 70%TP 50%TP 30%TP 10%TP Commission • t/ • implementation • Reduction Reduction Reduction Reduction 1,� TSS Reduction(INW) 1 850 1-5C9 1 104 567 .. • • $250,000 I per project TSS Reduction(%) 83's 67`w 49% 25 Legend TP Reduction(lblin) 5.0 36 2.1 0.7 =) - Live Storage Volume ! CATCr IO, (cubic feet) 1.612 87' 423 118 - . CATCIEA Iv Rain gardens Needed 16 9 5 1 MaterlalslLabor S56,000 531500 $17500 $3,560 i ORrP.LL Design Finalization 56,432 S3 618 52010 5402 ,TORhI sE\\t yr Commission partners • obtain • projects Promotion& - : Ralnaarden Prio $3,025 $2255 $1.815 $1,375 Administration Costs -1 ,�.r•,ort, Total Project Cost S11.457 S37373 521,325 $5,277 CosVIb Pho horns 513091 510.381 510.155 - $7.539 Reach t Reaerarion at wetland outlet Brooklyn nter,SCWMO 2012-2015 - y11 $5°,000 �R Reach 1 Stabilize streambanks Brooklyn Center,SCWMO 2012-2015 $20,000 Reach Ecological stream restoration Brooklyn Center,SCWMO Completed __ Reach 3 Ecological stream restoration Brooklyn Center,SCWMO Completed __ t f�, y ,t. ,i ,• .�`�`•' t Reach 4&5 Daylight stream Private developer 2012-2015 -- t 7". • -y 4'^." '~ `, Reach 6 Ecological stream restoration on Golf Course Brooklyn Center,SCWMO 2020-2025 $100,000 4 li S - a� 5�•,�. ' Reach 6 Ecological stream restoration Minneapolis,SCWMO 2020-2025 $250,000 tw rirN 't k Reach 7 Ecological stream restoration Minneapolis,SCWMO 2020-2025 ` �•'� "' ,L $1,500,000 Reach Ecological stream restoration Minneapolis,SCWMO 2012-2015 M $750.000 Reach 8 Fish passage at Webber Park Minneapolis,SCWMO 2012-2015 $50,000 }1 '+><..A.t 4e Reach 1 Add reaeration structures Brooklyn rk,SCWMO zo2o-zo25 y'n $50,000 'i Brooklyn Park 20 -2020 $So 000 +-'" Reach z Thin trees,establish buffer >5 � + Reach 3 Ecological stream restoration Brooklyn Park,SCWMO 2020-2025 $700,000 Reach 4 Ecological stream restoration Brooklyn Park,SCWMO Completed Reach 5&6 Enhance restoration Brooklyn Park 2015-2020 $"Ooo Reach 7&8 Enhance restoration Brooklyn Park 2015-2020 $50,000 Reach 7&8 Restore balance of reach(Regent to Brooklyn Brooklyn Center,Brooklyn Park, 2020-2025 o- Boulevard) SCWMO $35350,000 �� •.f,� °' Reach 9&to Ecological stream restoration,fish bypass Brooklyn Center,Brooklyn Park, 2012-2015 SCWMO i $ 0,00° Reach 11 Ecological stream restoration Brooklyn Park,SCWMO 201,52020 $500,000 Reach 11 Enhance off-line refugia Brooklet Park,SCWMO 2012-2015 $30,000 a R� . Ar Ah , Reach 12 Ecological stream restoration Brooklyn Park,SCWMO 2020-2025 $75,000 Reach 1 Ecological stream restoration Brooklyn Park,SCWMO 2015-2020 $300,000 't ,. Reach Monitor Cherokee Wetland SCWMO 2015-2020 Monitoring budget Reach 2 Ecological stream restoration Brooklyn Park,New Hope, 2015-2020 SCWMO $300,000 , Reach 3 Periodic ditch maintenance Hennepin County As needed $to,000 Reach3 Ecological stream restoration Plymouth,SCWMO 2020-2025 $100000 n.......OneTi me Cost $5.615,000 a Thank You ! ,l r Shinc �reek �� � es( ✓v�ss�ssv,