Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 08-02 PCP XRRNTER Ok I, PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AUGUST 2, 2012 STUDY SESSION 1. Call to Order: 7:00 PM 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes—June 28, 2012 Study Session 4. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 5. Planning Application Items with public hearing) a) Loren Van Der Slik/Gatlin Development Planning App. No. 2012-010 PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment (No. 2) to amend the previously approved 2011 Planned Unit Development for Shingle Creek Crossing (09/12/2011) 6. Planning Application Items without public hearing) a) Loren Van Der Slik/Gatlin Development Planning App. No. 2012-012 Consideration of a proposed Site and Building plan approval related to the proposed "Building G" as illustrated and planned for under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Master Development Plan, located at 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing. 7. Presentations (None) 8. Discussion Items 9. Adjournment MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION JUNE 28, 2012 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Rahn at 7:03 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Sean Rahn, Commissioners Scott Burfeind, Kara Kuykendall, and Stephen Schonning were present. Also present were Councilmembers Carol Kleven and Lin Myszkowski, Secretary to the Planning Commission Tim Benetti, Director of Business & Development, Gary Eitel, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Stan Leino and Michael Parks were absent and excused. Carlos Morgan was absent and unexcused. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —JUNE 14, 2012 There was a motion by Commissioner Burfeind, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to approve the minutes of the June 14, 2012 meeting as submitted. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Kuykendall abstained as she was not at the meeting. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Rahn explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. APPLICATION NO. 2012-009 PAUL HYDE (REAL ESTATE RECYCLING) Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-009, consideration of a proposed Preliminary Plat of property located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North, to replat two parcels into one large single lot for the recently approved France Avenue Business Center IV project. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 6-28-12 for Application No. 2012-009.) Mr. Benetti reviewed the history of the site going back to the applicant's acquisition of the site and City Council approval of PUD/Rezoning in May 2012. He explained that the developer is required to combine the two existing parcels as part of the overall redevelopment which includes clean-up and the construction of a new 90,000 sq. ft. office/warehouse facility. He added that the final plat will be known as Lot 1, Bock 1, France Avenue Business Park Addition. PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-009 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner, Burfeind to open the public hearing on Application No. 2012-009, at 7:09 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. Page 1 6-28-12 The applicant, Paul Hyde of Real Estate Recycling, stated they were awarded 100% of the grant applied for which will allow clean up start immediately followed by construction. He stated the tenant will occupy the building by December 1, 2012. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2012-009. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-12 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-009, SUBMITTED BY RER ACQUISITIONS, LLC, A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FRANCE AVENUE BUSINESS PARK ADDITION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4001 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE NORTH There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Burfeind, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-12. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its July 9, 2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. APPLICATION NO. 2012-006 LOREN VAN DER SLIK(GATLIN DEVELOPMENT) Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-006, Consideration of a proposed Site and Building plan approval related to the former Brookdale Mall Food Court building, now part of the new Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, located at 1300 Shingle Creek Crossing. Mr. Benetti explained that this application was tabled at the April 26, 2012 meeting and the applicant requested it be tabled until the July 26, 2012 meeting. APPLICATION NO. 2012-013 LOREN VAN DER SLIK (GATLIN DEVELOPMENT) Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-013, Consideration of a proposed Site and Building plan approval related to the proposed "Building H" as illustrated and planned for under the September 12, 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Master Development Plan, located at 1560 Shingle Creek Crossing. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 6-28-12 for Application No. 2012-013.) Page 2 6-28-12 Mr. Benetti explained that Building H is located on Lot 9, Block 1 of the new Shingle Creek Crossing Addition and is 1.10 acres in size. He added that the proposed building is proposed to be an 11,200 sq. ft. building, the same as comprehended under the 2011 PUD, and will include eight separate tenant spaces, each 1,400 sq. ft. in gross floor area. He further described in detail other proposed changes to Building H. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-13 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-013, SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK (GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) APPROVING NEW SITE AND BUILDING PLAN FOR PROPOSED BUILDING H (LOCATED ON LOT 9, BLOCK 1, SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING ADDITION— 1560 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING There was a motion by Commissioner Burfeind, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-13. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its July 9, 2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. APPLICATION NO. 2012-014 LOREN VAN DER SLIK(GATLIN DEVELOPMENT) Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-014 Consideration of a proposed Site and Building plan approval related to the proposed"Building K" as illustrated and planned for under the September 12, 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Master Development Plan, located at 1600 Shingle Creek Crossing. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 6-28-12 for Application No. 2012-014.) Mr. Benetti explained that Building K is located on Lot 10, Block 1 of the new Shingle Creek Crossing Addition and is 1.19 acres in size. He added that the proposed building is proposed to be a 9,500 sq. ft. building. He added that the approved 2011 PUD plan called for an 11, 410 sq. ft, building and will include seven tenant spaces with units ranging from 1,260 sq. ft. to 1,400 sq. ft. of gross floor area. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. Page 3 6-28-12 ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-14 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-014 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK (GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) APPROVING NEW SITE AND BUILDING PLAN FOR PROPOSED BUILDING K (LOCATED ON LOT 10, BLOCK 1, SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING ADDITION— 1600 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Burfeind, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-14. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its July 9, 2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. APPLICATION NO. 2012-015 LOREN VAN DER SLIK(GATLIN DEVELOPMENT) Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-014 Consideration of a proposed Site and Building plan approval related to the proposed"Building L" as illustrated and planned for under the September 12, 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Master Development Plan, located at 1600 Shingle Creek Crossing. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 6-28-12 for Application No. 2012-015.) Mr. Benetti explained that Building L is located on Lot 14, Block 1 of the new Shingle Creek Crossing Addition and is 1.19 acres in size. He added that the proposed building is proposed to be a 12,600 sq. ft. building. He added that the approved 2011 PUD plan called for a 10,920 sq. ft. building. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-15 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-015 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK (GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) APPROVING NEW SITE AND BUILDING PLAN FOR PROPOSED BUILDING L (LOCATED ON LOT 14, BLOCK 1, SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING ADDITION— 1150 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-15. Page 4 6-28-12 Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its July 9, 2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. DISCUSSION ITEM There were no discussion items. OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Burfeind,to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:38 p.m. Chair Recorded and transcribed by: Rebecca Crass Page 5 6-28-12 3 rBRA }V TER Application Filed on 06/26/2012 City Council action should be Planning Commission Report taken by 08/25/12(60 Days) Meeting Date: August 2,2012 Application No. 2012-010 Applicant: Loren Van Der Slik- Gatlin Development Company Location: Shingle Creek Crossing Request: Planned Unit Development—Amendment No. 2 INTRODUCTION Gatlin Development Company is requesting a planned unit development (PUD) amendment to the previously approved Shingle Creek Crossing PUD redevelopment plans. The original (submitted) amendment consisted of a number of changes or additions (as noted on the attached public hearing notice), which were subsequently reduced at the request of the Applicant, to only consider the following two amendment items: 1) Revise Building B (Lot 8) from an original proposed bank/financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use (as new Bldg. C); and 2) Reconfiguration of original Bldg. C from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food with drive thru service and retail use (as new Building G—Lot 1, Blk. 2), The original Shingle Creek Crossing PUD was approved on May 23, 2011, and was subsequently amended (Amendment No. 1) on September 12, 2011. These original and amended plans are attached as Master Plan No. 1, dated May 2011 and Master Plan No. 2, dated August 2011. An updated master plan, labeled Master Plan No. 3 and dated June 2012 is also included as part of this report and provides a general illustration of these proposed amendments. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (AMENDMENTS) 1. Revise Bldg. B (Lot 8)from an original proposed bank1financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use (as new Bldg. Q The updated Plan No. 3 'provided by the Developer illustrates a change to the original Building B pad site to a new Building C layout. Building B was originally proposed as a 9,100 sq. ft. building,with a typical drive-thru lane service feature. Preliminary plans for this site were as a future bank or financial services type business. App.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 1 ACCESS ROW DEDICATION TRAFFIIGNAL 1ntrnr:t yr nr^c)�. .... ..., :9 20' BUILDING SETBACK 15' ROW DED 1 �O ` BUILDI DRIVE-T RU If �t¢G SETBA '/r \ 9.1 009f 11 200d 45,000Sf LOT 9 LOT 8 BLOCK 1 BLOCK LOT 10, 111,410d 111,410d LOT 7, \ BLOCK 1 BLOCK 1 DIRE CTtON AL G N SITE DATA TABLE BUILDING PARKING PARKING DESCRIPTION LEGAL LOT AREA BUILDING REQ'D PROVIDED RATIO B Lot 8, Block 1 1.21 acres 9,100 sf. 41 spaces 41 spaces 4.51 The amendment requests a significant reduction of this building from 9,100 sf, retail/service use to a 2,488 sf. restaurant, along with a continuation of the drive-thru service lane. The lot size is also being reduced from 1.21 acres down to 0.85 acres. The restaurant site is also changing from its originally designed 41 spaces (ratio of 4.51 spaces per 1,000 sf. GFA) to only 27 spaces (ratio of 10.85 spaces per 1,000 GFA). Under the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreement, buildings are allowed to be reduced (from their original approved size indications) and all restaurants or eating establishments must attain or exceed 10 spaces per 1,000 sf. of GFA. The restaurant pad is also proposed to have a small outdoor patio area for its patrons. App.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 2 DRIVE-THRU F 20' BUILDING SETBACK EXISTING SIDEVVtOY C gL �w 1 1,200sf OCK H SMALL RETAIL 38,000Sf LOT 3, 3LOCK 1 SITE DATA TABLE BUILDING PARKING PARKING DESCRIPTION LEGAL LOT AREA BUILDING REQ'D PROVIDED RATIO C Lot 4,Block 1 0.85 acres 2,488 sf. 25 spaces 27 spaces 10.85 Although "restaurants" were identified as an allowable use under the original PUD Agreement between Gatlin Development and the City, along with agreeable standards for parking areas, it was understood that most of these sites (i.e. Buildings A, E and M) were planned to be a "sit-down style" restaurants, and not necessarily a convenience-food type facility. Moreover, convenience food restaurants with drive-up facilities are allowed under the prevailing C-2 —Commerce district by means of a special use permit. In some cases, the PUD [amendment] application can substitute as the typical special use permit process. App.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 3 Z Reconfiguration of original Bldg. C from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food with drive thru service and retail use (as new Building G—Lot 1, Blk. 2), Building C under the May/Sept. 2011 Master Plans indicate the proposed development as a 12,225 sf, single user/multi-tenant retail building, on a 1.44 acre lot, with 55 parking spaces or a 4.5 parking ratio. ACCESS COUNTY RD NO 10 / BASS LAKE RD FFIC SIGNAL =V- PARK4NG - SETBACK WITH 15' ROW DEDICATION DECORATIVE FENCING R 1' 15 �. ------ BUILDI TB# K, 6,17 12,225sf LOT 11, BLOCK 1 — LOT BLOC The proposed PUD amendment requests the building to be reduced to 8,420 sf, of mixed restaurant/retail service use, with 63 parking spaces (7.48 ratio), while slightly increasing the lot to 1.45 acres. The amendment also requests the allowance of a new drive-thru service lane to the end-cap restaurant user. Staff has knowledge of this proposed restaurant user and has deemed this use to be a convenience food type restaurant use as well. DRIVE-THRU G l 8,420sf Tuw` v BLOCK 2 L6T -=� Osf ': App.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 4 ANALYSIS & FINDINGS If these two sites were individual or stand-alone developments under a typical C-2 Commerce district area, a special use permit would be needed in order to allow for such convenience food type uses. However, when determining the appropriateness of a convenience food restaurant under an existing or established PUD, the City may elect to allow or permit such uses under a typical PUD Amendment process, as is being done under this particular application. Moreover, the same standards used for determining or granting special use permits may be considered, which are noted under Zoning Code Sect. 35-220; Subpar. 2. Standards for Special Use Permits, as follows: a. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be p g P detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. b. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. C. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. d. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. e. The special use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Since original Bldg. B was approved under the May 2011 and September 2011 PUD Plans as a use with a drive-thru lane, Staff does not object to continuing this feature or activity for the proposed restaurant use. For all intents and purposes, the transition of Bldg. B from a 9,100 sf. service use to a new Bldg. C, a much smaller 2,488 sf. convenience food restaurant use does still promote and enhances the general public welfare of this PUD, as it maintains and keeps the redevelopment activity of this site intact and ongoing, it reflects a current need or benefit to the Site as requested by the Developer, and this development will not be a detriment or danger to the public. Furthermore, the use should not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other uses in this PUD; should not impede the normal orderly development and proposed improvements of this PUD; adequate measures have or will be taken to provide suitable access to the site. Staff believes the final (future) site plan approval of this Bldg. C pad site will provide a feasible solution to any potential access issues, traffic and pedestrian circulation, and trash enclosure details. The transition of original Bldg. C to new Bldg. G is considerable. Bldg. C was approved under the May 2011 and September 2011 PUD Plans as a stand-alone or multi-tenant retail App.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 5 building use, with no drive-thru lanes. Even with these changes, Staff does not object to allowing or permitting a drive thru feature as part of this proposed (amended) restaurant use. The transition of Bldg. G to a new 8,400 sf. mixed-use restaurant and retail use promotes and enhances the general public welfare of this PUD, as it maintains and keeps the redevelopment activity of this site intact and ongoing, it reflects a current need or benefit to the Site as requested by the Developer, and this development will not be a detriment or danger to the public. Furthermore, the use should not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other uses in this PUD; should not impede the normal orderly development and proposed improvements of this PUD; adequate measures have or will be taken to provide suitable access to the site. This Bldg. G is subject to separate Site Plan review and consideration following this application matter. A number of comments or issues related to access issues, traffic and pedestrian circulation, and trash enclosure details have been noted by city staff in this separate Site Plan report; and should not preclude the approvals of allowing Bldg. G as proposed under this new PUD Master Plan and amendment application. REPLATTING ISSUES The changes made to these two building pad sites will also include future modifications to the original platted property lines of these respective lots. The changes proposed under new Bldg. C affect the original lot lines (layouts) for original Lots 3, 4, 5 and 10, Block 1 of Shingle Creek Crossing. Similarly, the changes proposed under new Bldg. G will require slight modifications to the original Lots 11, 12, and 13, Bock 1 of SCC. These specific lot changes and other lot modifications to be made throughout this PUD site, are to be considered under a separate, future re-plat application by Gatlin Development. Under approvals comprehended herein, conditions will be added that relate to these plat changes, both preliminary and final plats, which must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2011-16, which comprehends the approval of Planning Application No. 2012-010, which proposes a Planned Unit Development (PUD)Amendment to allow changes to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, subject to the following conditions and allowances: 1. Allow the revision of original Building B (Lot 8, Block 1 Shingle Creek Crossing), from an original proposed bank/financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive- thru service use, to be relabeled as Building C. 2. Allow the reconfiguring original Building C from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food restaurant with drive thru service and retail use, to be relabeled as Building G. 3. Allowances for these new Building C and G layouts are conditioned on the Applicant/Developer submitting a new plat (replat) of the new lot and block App.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 6 configurations, as illustrated on the June 28, 2012 PUD plan sets, and shall reflect in general conformance with the updated Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 3, dated June 2012. 4. The overall approval of the Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 3, dated June 2012, is not being recognized as an approved or final updated master plan at this time. The Applicant/Developer will be required to submit under a future PUD Amendment application request the acceptance and adoption of an updated master plan, which plan shall govern the planned and future redevelopment areas of this site. 5. The approval of these lot reconfigurations shall be made under separate plat application, with final plat approval by the City Engineer and City Council; 6. All existing provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall apply to these sites comprehended under this planning application (No. 2012-010) and all shall remain in effect for the entire Shingle Creek Crossing PUD project site. 7. Execution of a PUD Amendment agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. Attachments • Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 1 (May 2011) • Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No.2(August 2011) • Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 3 (June 2012) • June 28,2012 PUD Amendment Plan Set App.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 7 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held by the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center on the 2nd of August, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for the property described as follows: Legal Description: Lots 8, 11, 12, 13, 16 and 17, Block 1, Shingle Creek Crossing Addition This property is more commonly described as 1300 Shingle Creek Crossing. Said proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment has been submitted by Loren Van Der Slik to amend the previously approved Planned Unit Development for Shingle Creek Crossing (dated September 12, 2011). This amendment includes the following changes: 1) revise Bldg. B (Lot 8) from an original proposed bank/financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use (as new Bldg. C); 2) replatting of Lots 11, 12 and 13 into four new lots (Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 2) and which includes: a. reconfiguring original Bldg. C from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food with drive thru service and retail use (as new Building G — Lot 1, Blk. 2), b. reconfiguring original retail Bldg. D (Lot 11) into two new convenience food restaurants with drive thru services (new Buildings I and D - Lots 2 and 3, Blk. 2, respectively); and c. revise Bldg. E (Lot 13) from an original restaurant use to a new retail use (Bldg. E - Lot 4, Blk. 2); 3) replatting of Lots 16 and 17 into four new proposed lots (Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 3) and which includes: a. the reduction of original Bldg. Q from a 35,680 sf. retail store to a new 6,000 sf. restaurant use (Lot 3, Block 3) , b. the addition of new 7,500 sf. restaurant use (new Bldg. O - Lot 2, Blk. 3), and c. the additional day-lighting of the Shingle Creek waterway and related features (Lot 4, Blk. 3). Dated: July 18, 2012 Tim Benetti Planning Commission Secretary 2011 Master Plan (approved May 23, 2011) 14 Sr O. .. .-. -�;�;'' j�� 'R�'''��`�'� -:gyp, •" ��* 3 a � � .. ,. a a� aaa� ... �► , vik yr 1,MH - e 4 • A aV✓lJaa •J �^t'"t�a1 '4Y^51.^'t'� .'�. • t"V"'l_�.J<..11.1+.x.IkA� �!✓✓S1,lJO_ , %' J Iiii _ 1 V ► ..� lY �. 4v .� � 'W COUNTY p A N O, 10 PROPO ED PYLON�5113 3N a _ �.-.. ° Sa �A ,. b► ■ �. l _ v ,�q `� py� Ewsfltaa VIII � K i r k HIF1.L-_AND WAIL"- / IMDROVFMEN7��, RA � 1 PROPQSECI SHINGLE•+ �, t F �+ h " CREEK REGkONILLTWUL f A y -PROPOSED CAYLIGHT[0+ •, r. < _ {J4 F,Z Y _ SHINGLE CREEK *�* r .ti Xwrn+o � c',P k � '� IMtEBEF" a Fat AroC ry +e ' 6 A IYPI ..� \\' 70 FXIS7 NNFF i:Y'Y- LL YLO f'/� K Waimart:; STORE 05625-00} J A SHa9 F GiSassLNO lll , .., Z ^', .wow tkl,4tl Si.(APPktlX.1 � ` P- .V f SEARS type. SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING JF w i BROOKLYN CENTER, MN MASTER PLAN MAY 20 i 4p�tG +ate*. 'f PPPP'm e + Kimley-Horn GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and Associates, Inc. Ali, .r !.. ,:✓ NoTC 1m,..mM,m�an� IMPROVFMMMOSFARSPARrp N NOT PART OFTHK Pig)AND D Ir aee 171,11 1 1 IW Updated Master Plan (approved September 12, 2011) 7 ! , " r c0Ui1T1e --u-0 Ncl to _. ., � � FA'-:. � aie..,. c ���t - 169�h£JAEl1B� • i 10009TWISMOCIE , i• iw _. t rte' ■ ea���x. 40� STORE NOM" OA t ` It t� r i SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING . d BROOKLYN CENTER, MN Ole "9 - 1.`� • MASTER PLAN August 2011 PP11 y r / y h p �. • ;4 vt GARIN DE Ei.01ENT Cf�MPAID` a d'A$ociates, Inc. �+► *'' ► W..'n: IUI Xary M[nlaCa x - -fnt wmM wtx-5..•s�rxM:sW ��n�A_o rrsr fia is •e� 'T" •• "4-{y7° *;.t ..y r ' e ..• ,. F i ' • ..__.': '--1L_� jy! f �i.„ (( n t k� tiii' N��1+1R ` �Z� „ 400 w O �; Q -000Qc o0o a ❑ 0 000 i.11001 >, ..000 -000UNTY ROAD N10 O -- _`'_� I 0 00•"- 00 00a ,�••0 r5 w MONUMENTSIGN ,. . ♦ y �' 1 ,. �� - •�PYLON SIGN � MONUMENT SIGN PYLON SIGN , - ^! � _ 1 ..0 arts•.,nR �n* t m ` i ' J awu _ a `F � • 41E0� ` , r , /�� • SS's • p� C.. �• \" ? fir'' .Q •� �t47� � �� - �` PROPOSED SHINGLE` HINGL6 E CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL ' } a SIGN •� � �S --EXISTING DAY LIGHTED SHINGLE CREEK A � i � A+ �• `' ,, � �:. _ � '� � ;y �� '�`mil S6 20 ;ti. r 1 a T�'/ , TRAIL CONNECTION �cus a I�� EXISTING BRIDGE '�•'` ' a . .�® , PYLON SIG� �.�� SH POS D FDD DIONAGHTING �- �40 Wa€mart AO 40, W - ' ISTINGSHINGLE i, t Y CR \ CREING CULVERT FREEWAY PYLON SIGN .• ` EXISTING FILTRATION + . AREA,TYP) f -� PO ENTIAL ' '���� Sew SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SEPARATION o OTA BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 0 , ► X .., , �= Y " \ _ MASTER PLAN 'FREEWAY PV LON SIGN y:, SO • %' 1 V �e. •�� � NO.3 JUNE 2012 •55TH AVENUE - ;�� •��� �� o 60 120 140 FT� ,1 Kimley-Horn y GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and Associates,Inc. 101—Main-3 `Jw4F E' E 1 vx!E i Td 615-.&7 04 3"!055 5 PM1L NNESO 56 5 Te1615446]104 rt+-nU.l6 6+5 INV g 645-5116 Fn 615.446]105 i - METRO TRANSIT STATION - J J 1 __ _ TING ___- - ___ EXISTING FULL ."- -- 8 AF FIC ACCESS COUNTY RD NO 101 BASS LA KE RD ESS TRAFFl [ SIGNAL "' - ®wT7Ll•1FFIGN(1L^° "" dU EASEMENT CC;SIL 10'D R -- _.___- + DRIVE-THRU ,-.20 BUILDING.] \C k "" 'n _DRIVE TNRU - y SETBACK 1 15'BUILDING __ _ i SETBACK ( — — e a ir n OUTLOTA a aPna amwux. _ `'/ 10'Dd u__ CF t` i 1 reoon lrx �, \ POD f/ / OUPDARY EASEMENT i LOCK 2 LOT 2, LOT J. 01 T \ �� 35'BUILDING l \ EXISTING h\ 3 1. 4•L B Ci \ / KOHL'S SETBACK ,/ 8,500af T2• \ 10T 7f \ \� �.'�\\ ::-- a A�?1 1 \ 20'0dU _ It BLOCKI \ \ \ •1 O \ ` \� \\ a, --� If L` w �\ �SEMENT .1a P'z / \ \ 1 \ J a. - \ \\ ` LL t.1 \ Rt M••. AINA A-,-, i / \ B t i \ L CRS 1\�� � ❑i�., \ Tom\ jig-. Cl a •���i �I v vvv kR�'.V v. tl \\ T NLI i V \W", �A NT y \, i\ "7 \ O AD V6,9106HTING � k ID e 6 FULL �� y wi, \ _ �"'Ce✓ �,�! I e{( �,� R k a T ACCES A , S_. '— If/ \ � ,il- �, � - ,r.• a \ EASE ENT / � � � � u �� � t. \ � �L � � W S \ // ✓ F EATURE 05•D a u "� 1 —��a ! SYMBOL LEGEND. r i I EXISTING •i/ St,�'^ EXISTING EASEMENT BUILDING yti' \ \ 1�2 / ---- J 3 2 \\ \ ��yy��\\ \'f nOlA�l i \ \ -� / r r Tura�[IXr o�r.Nnric 169.555 BE a(,� + 1 ! PI q / SG(�NJC F'B-0 P I F S 11 i� (APPROX.) \\ \\ \ _ „OVERLOOK F m eJj ZT E�,RE PROPERTY W {� LINE aRanosEO —A. 1— Z Z W O n f Z \\ \ t �� ' Y CEP vxovasm 1--EA F_ $ �0WW p a SIGN LEGEND: W� Z P FP O .x¢wAr vnox sw EXISTING SEARS vv // j �o SITE DATA TABLE rc a 1 /FOYEN TIAL SEPARATIp cl- E ; • t 'S° z 1 A�e�A ENT �\ \ / NO'�JC'1 urareaa a., w EXISTING Z 33 .L \ BTORNI G R Y �M// P ,fQIlN7DARY FP/ W U y �_ \ 2 Z 0 J a --=EXISTING 0 0 7� FULL - r J ss -ACCESS 1 )'� i �. { JS NSP Z d' °W //J EASEMENT NORTN =m F '.`.� � J• \ l :C' F.- / - Y � snxartwaac ruwvur 06 2BI2012 SHEEL PROJECT 0. t �. ,(„�J 16D6]3IX11 N.UIMBER o{ --- - m �r _.> - `��NO 10 r.r :JUNTV Rn NO 10 +F SS LAKE ROALI -- - - r ,� r PUD BOUNDAII, r 3 d t J �C.�-t�� l 1� L - U 1f ' 1 "` 111 1 l/ �� /�y ti.. �• r r , K v �eT / } { t �E�L_.,b'TIMGr/ �� � � `i;,\ e •�-� ,$,,,�.. �� �/, a �� '// �\\ ey 's'��.`.`"�`\ ��`��j. �i� g / FA s ti es I �, ee �,.✓ �:� w a x i /� �; ✓ /� i` PHASING HATCH LEGEND: z w w 1(fVX ,v /% �Y O PHASE I- COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS W Q p� Q>x �c xwa PHASE II d O 1 PHASE III - FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS Z Z (n L T T DISTURBED DURING W / A 0 TO F,asn F CONSTRUCTION REA N uc y ws Y W W W on s we ssi`n`<r`a°X�aac.o6 W LU s r ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT CC Z _ i GOPHER STATE CALL ONE W Y pAR�' '/ -, NN TOLL FREE 1-600-252-1166 J bJCC _ / - ' ,R WN CTYOARE66�I56E0002 Z O - 4p L E �iT G 3. r I ,'h � ////y',/y/y�/ � ALERT TO CONTRP,CTOR �,m cunlNwn. m x 06/25/2012 MOXCT NO i 11l F i �' \ S'J� `}+'`. ` n[auw[o ars 2�notuLou�ueo nT SNEET BER o� 0� i' Q� ±� e, ��°� ;•_ a'�S�x l \�� / ,Y 4 � Y� is � a a � BA F Al ski �f ' P a3w- LUI, 0z?0 A—)-l—TER p m Q UO f i X w x aso .f W w z m fl 12f aow ry � w ' ,,, � ,......•' � NoRrH Z Z •� pO j 0Q •j '/ LEGEND c.,s�.,c s,ob sErzR u.�«af V Z W w n• _ -... p ...........wrs v as.uee.xa U �2 ACREAGE SUMMARY–PROJECT O PHASE II AT TOTAL BUILD–OUT) Z O – S m 3 w as wsru;sm.mi. 1', i arsrysmm•u.♦r—1. tE0633W�1 a€ BASS LAKE ROAD T ( i ,1 {1 t � L 8 e ^w• _ f t J i 7 I e ft.wvui 4p gjig / 1v 8a. ;7 r I � � .., � � � � ,�. ..P✓ ��� u.` �s may- T n v� y3' ,,j.; -, � �� .•�: ���J/i E 6 1 a EXISTING �,y� T WALMART ) IN CONTRACTACT t'3 \y y� m .V L o�"" t w w x LLJ �l 'xI i/ / //,i ✓ i�� LEGEND =5 O p P —r<�k/ / i / I NnaE oE�E�oPU�* d f � �' s i �\ Q 44 \\ may v /.. P Pw os �»w zz oxaaosEO xn> sccnox (A q- xoaasEO cm v F Z y 1 / v� i i Enrn.�sTae�sEwm Y W LU 2 f , i t •�'Cf ��t i t, �i" �i �x R..r�R coN.oWR �Y . F �•_ uN �.WR �O E..n,EO ELROw ELI,-0 O 201 w �1 a/25%2012 t X v „r' / 606NU of j• BER 04 E42" E51" E42 0 Y ROAD 4 15" E12 i 2'x4 Bo STING FXISTINC 15" 12-d ST ORMCEPTOR E 1 5'�. .__E 8j L - 15't 15" 15" 24 m✓ DAY-LIGHTED STING ❑STORMCEPTOR -1 Valli !2 E18 SHINGLECREEK 15•"24„ ew 24" EN V A� F24"I E15" SEDIMENT 23"X36" e2n- f eAv, E15' TRAP I E 12' V E18" E42. E15" ISTING E15" STORMCEPTOR E15'. E48" 12 136" E18' E21 1,o ." "", -a I EXISTING I ISTING \J �69555 SF WALMART NOT STORMCEP'TOR APPROx.) IN CONTRACT) E15" 4 P!!S L) w 0 _75T z El Y Is '!� Lu om LL, I u I L) LU ET 0 Lu —E FEET Lu_i E48" u)w u) L LEGEND <>0 LU 48- EXISTING PRIVATE STORM SEWER EL cr PROPOSED PRIVATE STORM SEWER EX" EXISTING X-INCH STORM SEWER 0 X" PROPOSED X-INCH STOW SEWER z Z W., EII-TI- PROPERTY LINE cf) 51i R/ WATER EATURE/STORMWATER 0 LLI I TREATMENT AREA F- z f 'ON-SITE STORM SEWER IS PRIVATE UNLESS NOTED OTHERVASE Y W L W LU OFF RATES of Z RATES x-m fGES) L) Ex— 111. LLI Ne P� I 181 18 _j 0 0 RUNOFF VOLUME CD EXISTING A.W U0 U) PROPOSED M/23/2M2 mc w. _16D833D01 SHEET MLMIIER 05 as - - EXISTING PJ dyriTERMAIN __ _- _ `•__^�• :;{ �„` COUNTY ROAD NO 10/BASS LAKE ROAD LI - _F PUD 80UNDAR ..: 0 0 0 c } Y v L 3 0 JU•� I .L1 y I�-EFH i %� v I �� �, y / �; F,asLS /`.. _ `gig,^, '•.�°`{ 61 4 � Vd � .. - _��_ ,c.� �e ".• � . (1cr.,,5� � ,�v xisrlNC\ lit J �� "e EXISTING �� I y''• `,`\\ �••.> •`A 7 PLEBEES � j O T ) _� �. .1. •��� a'� , I \�1� PUD BOUNDARY EFH E6.. \\© d FFH 0 E10" \\ EFH��• E\0 $ p S��S E6'` E6' EXISTING i EFH W y �7✓1\i, !.. WALMART(NOT •y' �, I. to~ IN CONTRACT) t\•,^ i �\ j Z aD > FH E r) riE<;rc _ _ w g w a Q 8 NORTH L) }O z ZI= % 1 Cl i/' V \ /'i r'E F h- ' U p W LLI \ LU W 0) E 1 ✓ =" Fg \ CEO. �'• r y� LEGEND ;. EF E6 ,'/...EFH,�,. \ i \G EXISTING WATER PIPE Z Z L i A� \ ' \ (� 1 y.�P PROPOSED POTABLE WATER PIPE N _ GATE VALVE IN VALVE BOX(MUST BE W TRAFFIC RATED IN PAVEMENT AREAS) U Z { �•,;;. 11 s i/ /"' FIRE HYDRANT WITH BOLLARD PROTECT W U LU t i 7 EXISTING X-INCH WATER LINE d'Z V •I �� �� PROPOSED X-INCH WATER LINE EFH X' W Y �O EFH EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 0 cr y Z --�- (T �`,y v FH PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT =p0 i • ``i, PROPERTY LINE U x aE c , IISD63T No. ••t`7 1: 16D633D01 P f '1' `'^•, 'ALLWATER LINE AND STRUCTURES ARE PRNATE U NLEWNOTEDOTHE—SE 06 -------------------------- -------- COUNTY ROAD NO 10 - EXISTING LIFT —T1 _ � � -�-v--EF_ TATION ,,�7 7-_ _ _ •T-,'"r ,z�-r __ �� _ _. _ r _ F •r `��i' � "'_ � e ...�� ," i B. � OO � v�r PUD BOU GARY o/ '°✓ ! 2 ,A^PRIVATE EY 101 \ iV 20'DBI�\y: I .6 6 \\ ,LIFT STATION Yet �� -! `� _ EASEMN j EXISTING / GGy APPLEBEES E2� I N'4•PRII/ATE 1 �. i EASEME FO N ) NT \` , \RXVI ee LF / O 8 § `ate 67 ol \ qfl Z REAP \\ C EXISTING m I v A WALMART(NOT AF IN CONTRACT) 2 X LU of pJ ., Eh LU a W [ 1` vaUlW LU ! 0 �\ O aoz i£I 1•.R \ E'P `\ O .�.• % % NORTH N 1. C3 // IJ �\ �� t� Py LEGEND wo 0 t{e 0 �(< p�W EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE U Z LU PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PIPE W U EE W lob wZ PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN U J 1 - R IN R ---' EXISTING X INCH SANITARY SEWS LINE --------- - 'e;y , '\ \ PROPOSED X-INCH SANITARY SEWER LINE Z 0 - f ' t� X'_ PROPERTY LINE 'ALL SANITARY SEWER AND STRUCTURES ARE PRIVATE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE T20 I 12 j 1606 NUMBER st « 07 -------------- --------------------- Sid - -- - - -- - ----------------- -------------------------------------- ---------- --------------------- ----------- ------------------------- COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD 'IQ NO ----- ———-------------- --COIUNTY 10 BASSLAKEROA ----------------- -—----- PUD BOUND Qz �V PHOTOMETRIC NOTES: I —IN—IE I--—�—E Z 4a > LIGHTPIXEMM-141-1— 111-—LL IE M AT In (L I.—TELI—ING PUD BOUNDARY ELE TR AN Lu =u- LIGHTFI—RESSH-100— 0 z X 0 OW -0 L GHT POLE& !r=W FIXTURES Uj CL -U.1 LIGHT POLE& Uj 5 FC(FOOT CANDLES) FIXTURES U)LU LD U) 3 FC WQ a. 10 PC I FC 5 PC(FOOT CANDLE. FC PC 0 0 z Z . z 0✓6 PARKING LOT LIGHTING PECIESTMAN TRAIL LIGHITNG U.1 z W L) ULI Of Z I1.11 ION w Y. (90 0 w E DO I V) 06/28/2012 x C.E PRMCT 10 16W33MI V Y RD NO JO BASS ,OU�JT D NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD -" E" _ -^- 111 NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD s id lit r } i /"231 © •\• `` \ �';I'. � rJ /� EXISTING g % �,' - ', 5 t`\•.� '. �I � Y ""//``-CY � KOHLS � /- I i g .r) u. f O �\ ( j , L L o /� �' �� '��. \ s.�,t�l \ ��\. \. \��. �• Ff f' � ; Lz PUD BOUNDARY(TYP.) / 4{ , , o EXISTING % �� LEGEND BUILDING: EXISTING g �\ 169.555 SF WALMART(NOT a E e > (APPRGx-) a {,1 IN CONTRACT) ,. J "a PUD BOUNDARY( .)� �� / ' 1 ^ TYP � , ^ � EXISTING TREES(rO REMAIN) L t �% j•�/-/ r �\ .�'. \ J;T�P� ,.'��/ 1 A!_ EXISTING RAIN GARDENI g m t \ y�� �~ •\. S % STORMINATERAREA CL D.2 PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE Z W LU r n r� w SYMBOL QTY COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT W Ol m x \\ I 1 11 \\ ~�., �: SWAMPWHITEOAK TCAL B68 N W Z U) COMMON HACKBERRV 2.S CAL B&B =W g NEWHORIZON ELM 2.S CAL. 66B a AUTUMN BLAZE MARE 251C B&B l! \ \ f OVERSTORV /,* /• DECIDUOUS SK UNE HONEYLOCUST 2.5-CAL. 868 QUAKING ASPEN no CONT. u• i T''.� / �'\ \ '1�' •/� { / /� BIRCH(SINGLE STEM&CWMP) no CONT. z j(° tX ,� '� / (I -G' •�`/ 'tiL '.1r� `/ - Ivo6v aLK UTAC no CONT. (n ORNMIENTAL CRABAPPLE i20 CONT. W '� _ ✓ F _ / // DECIDUOUS F X,' 61-ACKHILLSSPRUCE BHT B&B $[N C \\\• \ 1I ) .,i RED PINE 6 H BbB LU Y / JUNIPER BNT BbB Z EVERGREEN V J e •1 ,.-y ^\ l l am,/�y NORTH VIBURNUM 0 CONT. �yJ Y g Ft.I, �\ _ 1 \,/ / DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE a CONT. O DobwooD is CONT. Z w LILAC 0 CONT. 7 - SPIREA p CONT. (n w Y 11 DAVIILY W CONT. DATE \ 06/28/2012 KMLFOERbTER t1 CONT. PRO.ECT No CONT. 160633DO1 SHRUBI PERENNWL a SHE ng n °:\gym. cr\v. ni\un i� r ni. , vial • �Olt Ile e II �I 6tri� ;, ��Ir � N oQ t / �v n \ D \ 0 ¢ \ m = � m m HINGLE CREEK CROSSING PHASE II CONCEPTUAL R9mwAw oo.MAi2E6 IGmley-Hom S mp DEVELOPMENT PLANS °°° ff, ❑�❑ andAssomtes Inc. BROOKLYN CENTER,MN CIRCULATION EXHIBIT $p HENNEPIN MINNESOTA SHEET 10 OF 11 «m e• U�rt. _ X11° ashsorvs Ai[ 9 COUNTY RD NO 101 BASS LAKE RD - ; jp RE6S#SiRARYS`-- �� ruL �•_°°—� ...3N/TH`ORTVETRRns REVISED C¢t' ,IVE THNO t. _. z _ - If I :aal ' 1 wan 1 u c4U v i a u.mon v O EXISTING KOHL'S 4 k1'I a NNtI \ \ N \\ wa / y 3ol VX� I 8; �j'/;• '. { `\ ��.'.•,> ��+��,rw *�\` j�X SYMBOL LEGEND `e g EXISTING > \) BUILDING: \ 1� 169.555 SP �v Welmark ' § 111rj l (��: (APPROX.) a U 1 <' va Booms.,Da.rcE. w o u_ P II la \ E P ED PARTIAL U~d U OAYLIGHTING O w Q I G MLE onaN 9aN Z co FD CC, FIR cr EL _ SI GEND: a i �i i \ ••i / �P ,� urmaxs m mEHas W IE e SITE DATA TABLE C7 �t \ ✓ Z_Z a % I /PO JENTIAL SEPARAYION U) �` U) LU EXISTING ® U~ rA i 4 1 �,■,V�+ + F; .0 \ STORMWATER LU U Lu If Lu Z � w i r � \ \ 1 a, i•^2 _ - Yr .. cnffrc r.wau J a� Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-16 RESOLUTION REGARDING RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-010 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK (FOR GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT TO THE 2011 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PUD WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center adopted City Resolution No. 2011-85, dated June 13, 2011, which approved the establishment of the original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an approved Development/Master Plan and certain allowances and development standards that would govern over the PUD; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center subsequently adopted City Resolution No. 2011-127, dated September 12, 2011, which approved the first amendment to the original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company (Applicant) submitted Planning Application No. 2012-010, which proposes a second amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, by allowing certain changes to the approved 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends additional adjustments not approved under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development and the related 2011 PUD Agreement,which are noted as follows: 1) Revise Building B (Lot 8, Block 1, SCC) from an original proposed bank/financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use, as new labeled Building C; and 2) Reconfiguration of original labeled Building C (Lot 11, Block 1, SCC) from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food with drive thru service and retail uses, as new labeled Building G. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on August 2, 2012, whereby a staff report and public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development Amendment were received and considered by the Planning Commission; the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development Amendment request in light of all testimony received, including the guidelines for evaluating such amendments as contained in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan; and 1 WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center did determine that Planning Application No. 2012-010, as submitted by Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company, may be approved based upon the following considerations: A. The Planned Unit Development Amendment is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. B. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. C. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. D. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this development can be considered an asset to the community. E. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating Planned Unit Development Amendment as contained in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2012-010 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. Allow the revision of original Building B (Lot 8, Block 1 Shingle Creek Crossing), from the original proposed bank/financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use, to be relabeled as Building C. 2. Allow the reconfiguring original Building C (Lot 11, Block 1, SCC) from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food restaurant with drive thru service and retail use,to be relabeled as Building G. 3. Allowances for these new Building C and G layouts are conditioned on the Applicant/Developer submitting a new plat (replat) of the new lot and block configurations, as illustrated on the June 28, 2012 PUD plan sets, and shall reflect in general conformance with the updated Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 3, dated June 2012. 2 4. The overall approval of the Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 3, dated June 2012, is not being recognized as an approved or final updated master plan at this time. The Applicant/Developer will be required to submit under a future PUD Amendment application request the acceptance and adoption of an updated master plan, which plan shall govern the planned and future redevelopment areas of this site. 5. The approval of these lot reconfigurations shall be made under separate plat application, with final plat approval by the City Engineer and City Council; 6. All existing provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall apply to these sites comprehended under this planning application (No. 2012-010) and all shall remain in effect for the entire Shingle Creek Crossing PUD project site. 7. Execution of a PUD Amendment agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. August 2,2012 Date Chair ATTEST: Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Chair, Commissioners and the following voted against the same: None. whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 3 C*M BROOKLYN CENTER Application Filed on 06/26/2012 City Council action should be Planning Commission Report taken by 08/25/12 (60 Days) Meeting Date: August 2,2012 Application No. 2012-012 Applicant: Loren Van Der Slik- Gatlin Development Company Location: 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing Request: Site&Builidng Plan—Building G INTRODUCTION Gatlin Development Company is requesting review and consideration of a Site and Building Plan approval for the new building labeled "G" as part of the approved Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD). This is one of fifteen new buildings proposed to be built within this PUD site. This site plan item does not require a public hearing, but can be considered under a standard public meeting review, whereby comments from the general public may be allowed or noted for the record. Written notices have been mailed to property owners within 350-feet of the site. BACKGROUND On May 23, 2011 the City Council approved the original Shingle Creek Crossing PUD for the redevelopment of the former Brookdale Mall properties, with the exception of the Sears and Holiday station. The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD site was originally zoned as PUD/C-2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce) district. This zoning remains in place and is not subject to any changes or modifications at this time. At the August 25, 2011 meeting, a new PUD Amendment was reviewed and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission, which was accepted and approved by the City Council on September 12, 2011. Approvals related to this PUD amendment included the separation of the former food court building from the Sears store building, along with the removal one future building pad site and the addition of an additional restaurant pad site, and other slight modifications. The Developer has requested (under separate application) a PUD Amendment to allow modifications to this site, which includes a change from the original designed multi-tenant retail building space to a new mixed-use multi-tenant retail building with allowance for a convenience food restaurant user and related drive-thru service lane. Other changes include a slight change to the original lot configuration. The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Master (Development) Plan was approved with a plan to build a new 182,000 sf. Wal-Mart retail store, the keeping and remodeling of the old Brookdale Mall food court building, and fifteen new building pad sites, some of which were intended to be for typical retail uses (as either single users or multi-tenant spaces); restaurant pad sites or service uses. Construction work on the new Wal-Mart store and other site/utility improvements are nearing completion, and other areas of the PUD site are now being considered. The City recently approved the site and building plans for Buildings H, K, and L and work on those is anticipated to begin in the near future. ❖ SITE & BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS This proposed Building G was originally identified under the May/September 2011 PUD plans as Building C, which was intended to be a 12,225 sf. retail building on a 1.44 acre pad site (as illustrated on the diagram below—lower left). This pad site was also platted as Lot 11, Block 1, Shingle Creek Crossing. The new Bldg. G (lower right) is scheduled to be a smaller multi- tenant, mixed use building of 8,420 sf. with virtually same size lot of 1.45 acres. This lot and surrounding lots may undergo a replat in the future (but are not for consideration under this application). W o COUNTY ROAD NO_.- TO COUNTY ROAD Nt_._,f 0_ ..__ . YLON SIGN PROPOSED MONUMENT ONUMENT SIGN SIGN ) -' 12 22nv, 8,42W — K! APPROVED PUD—SEPTEMBER 2011 PROPOSED PUD—AUGUST 2012 As part of the PUD Agreement between Gatlin Development and the City, the Developer is allowed to decrease final building sizes without the need for any PUD amendment or special approvals, but is not allowed to increase building sizes, except in certain cases where a 5% increase is allowed under City Zoning Code Section 35-355. Subdiv. 5.d. App.No.2012-012 PC 08/02/12 ❖ ACCESS & PARKING NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN la UTILITY E TRAS N014 AW17\ ENCLOSU .a, ft 1 �• I 1 7 $ 1 1 I 4 _ ?FJ Ua OB � i B The new Site and Building Plan for Building G is noted in the above diagram. Plans call for 64 parking spaces on this site, which calculates to a 7.48 parking ratio. The original pad layout (Bldg. C — shown below) was designed to accommodate 55 spaces, for a 4.5 parking ratio. The new parking area had to be adjusted to accommodate the added need for the convenience food space. DECORATIVE 15' ROW DEDICATION FENCING +t 1. 15' 16UILDI t ETB K �_f t 12,225sf M i I -- LOT 11, L BLOCK 1 L `\ ! G Dk The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreement provided a parking standard reduction for retail uses from 5.5 spaces per 1,000 sf. of gross floor area(GFA) to a reduced 4.5 spaces per 1,000 sf. of gross leaseable area(GLA). Restaurants were allowed to reduce from one space per two seats plus one per employee to a reduced 10 per 1,000 sf. of GLA, with an added provision that up to 20% of the GLA in a multi-tenant retail building may be a restaurant use without the need for additional parking. As noted in the floor plan(below)the total GLA for this Bldg. G is 8,314 sf. I ' ao x-c ana aoo aa-o as o 11 P1. i� R TENANT T-\.a W- TEIyWf TC1 T n"XNT TVMT 1 1E.77115 F--IT2_1 ® 1200® t�® ®� 900 9F IbbO X � Ell �'►b` FLOOR PLAN As indicated in this report, the proposed end-cap tenant space is reserved for a"convenience food restaurant" use with a drive-thru window service lane. This tenant space is shown with a 1,834 sf. space, or 22% of the GLA. Even with the slight increase over the 20% threshold, the site provides additional parking spaces and exceeds the original 4.5 ratio with a new 7.48 ratio. Even separating out the tenant space uses and applying the PUD approved parking standards, this site's parking could be calculated as follows: Restaurant Use: 1,834 sf. GLA= 1.834 x 10= 18.34, or 19 spaces required Retail Uses: 6,480 GLA=6.48 x 4.5 =29.16, or 30 spaces required. Based on these calculations, the site is providing 15 more spaces than required by the PUD. The additional parking on this site should easily accommodate this restaurant use and serve the other retail uses adequately. App.No.2012-012 PC 08/02/12 Access into this site is limited to the main access point off the east/west access road through the PUD. Vehicles entering the site have two-way maneuvering to the parking areas along the east and south sides of this building site. The traffic is limited to one-way along the back(north) and west sides of this site, due to the limitations created by the inclusion of the drive-thru lane for the westerly end-cap user. Signage and striping of the lot will be key in keeping traffic free from any conflicts entering and exiting this site. The City Engineers have indicated some concerns of this in their review memo (attached hereto), and have asked the Developer to provide "...better channel[ization] and delineat[ion]"of this traffic in the southwest portion of this site. The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD was approved with an overall architectural [elevation] plan as part of the original approvals. All new buildings plan to incorporate 4-sided architecture in their designs, meaning all four elevations must provide a nice, consistent use of material on all four sides of the buildings, including rear elevations. As noted on the enclosed architectural plans, this Building G is slated to receive a nice mix of stone veneers, EIFS, concrete brick veneers, integrally colored rock face block, spandrel glass and other materials. These proposed architectural materials are consistent with the previously approved Architectural Standards (including materials)the City called for under the original PUD Agreement. ❖ GRADING/DRAINAGE/UTILITIES The finished grades and drainage grades for this this site and adjacent building sites are intended to be constructed under a future land disturbance permit. The site plans and related attachment plans included separate grading and drainage plans for this and other sites. Most of these sites (and primarily the entire PUD site last year) have been or will be reviewed by the City Engineer for full compliance and acceptance. Since some of the overall PUD development site infrastructure has already been installed, there is not much room for need to depart from the original and approved grading/drainage plans. All areas of this site appear to drain properly or do not require any special drainage structures or modification prior to building approvals. •'• LANDSCAPING The Applicant has submitted a landscape plan which appears to be consistent with the approved PUD Master Plan. Plans call for the installation of various deciduous trees (oaks, maples, hackberry, elms or honey locust) around the parking islands of this building site. A few evergreens (spruce, red pines or junipers) are planned for areas on the west side, north(rear) side of the building, and few inside the parking lot. The plan is completed with a small number of ornamental deciduous trees (birches, lilacs, or crabapples). All trees and landscaped areas will be irrigated. This lot is also improved with a small rain garden feature to the rear of this building. ❖ LIGHTING/TRASH The site plans for Bldg. G calls for two 39-ft. high single-headed light standards along the back parking area and one, dual headed lamp in the front parking lot area. The photometric plan illustrates the main front area of the building will be provided with suitable and adequate light coverage, with pedestrian lighting along the outer walkways. App.No.2012-012 PC 08/02/12 The plans illustrate two new outdoor trash enclosures for this site. The SCC Master Plan did not illustrate or indicate the placement of any trash enclosure areas within this PUD site. Staff assumed that most of these building sites may attempt or had planned to have all trash inside said buildings. It is not uncommon to see (or allow)this typical trash enclosures in retail/service uses such as this PUD site. The plans did not provide a "typical trash enclosure" detail; however, as the City id in the previous approvals of Bld s. H K. and L these similar style structures shall tY p PP g � tY be approved to be constructed with pre-colored rock faced block materials similar to the main buildings, with composite wood gates. These enclosures will be required to be well maintained and gates closed at all times (except during unloading times). City Engineers also requested better separation of these enclosures and protection from traffic,by means of curb and gutter sections. Staff assumes the Developers engineering/design consultants will provide additional measures as noted by the City Engineers and address these items under the future building permit submittals. CITY ENGINEER REVIEW The City Engineer has provided a review and comments regarding this application in his July 20, 2012 memorandum to city planning staff, attached hereto. Most of these comments and conditions reflect the improvements approved under the PUD Plan amendment. Some of these conditions may be applicable at time of future building permit review and approvals. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2012-17, which comprehends the approval of Planning Application No. 2012-012, a Site and Building Plan for the proposed Building G, which is part of the approved Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, subject to the following conditions: 1. Developer/Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer's Review memo, dated June 20, 2012, including (but not limited to): a. The two-way and one-way traffic transition in the southwest corner of the subject site need to be better channelized and delineated; and b. The trash enclosures must be better separated and protected from traffic (e.g. curb and gutters). 2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 3. The building and tenant spaces are to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing systems to meet NFPA standards and connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 4. The location or placement of any fire hydrants and other fire related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief. App.No.2012-012 PC 08/02/12 5. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 6. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. The new trash enclosure with same building materials as those used to construct the principal building. 7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Site Plan approval is exclusive of all final signs on this site, including new wall (building) signs, which shall remain subject to Chapter 34 of the city ordinances, and subject to the approved Signage Plan of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreements. 9. B6-12 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 10. The Developer shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 11. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center current Standard Specifications and Details. 12. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City's Engineering Department and applicant shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 13. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. 14. All other provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall remain in effect. Attachments • Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-17 • City Engineer's Review Memo—dated 07/20/2012 • Interior/Architectural Plan—Sheet A6 • Phase 2—Site Improvement Plans for Building G(06/28/2012) • Phase II—Conceptual Development Plans(06/28/2012) App.No.2012-012 PC 08/02/12 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 20, 2012 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor SUBJECT: Shingle Creek Crossing—Building Pad G site plan review Public Works Department staff reviewed the Preliminary Site Plan documents dated June 28, 2012, and rovides the following recommendations, comments and conditions: p g 1. The following comments are contingent upon preliminary and final plat approval and final site plan and land alteration/building permit submittal and approval for Phase 2 of the Shingle Creek Crossing development. 2. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City of Brooklyn Center's standard specifications and details. The City's standard details must be included in the plans. 3. Upon project completion, the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures, and provide certified record drawings for any associated private and/or public improvements prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project. 4. Inspection for the site improvements must be performed by the design/project engineer. Upon project completion and in connection with the certified as-builts,the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer's immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the state of Minnesota and must certify all required as-built drawings. 5. A subdivision agreement is required that includes all conditions of the project approval, subject to the final site plan approval by the City Engineer. 6. A fast food type drive thru is not consistent with the original approved PUD. 7. A site plan is required to be submitted as part of this application and review of the PUD Site Plan (Ordinance 35-355)that includes proper dimensioning of drive aisles, parking stalls, curve radii, and other typical site plan dimensioning. This must be provided for evaluation. 8. The 2-way/ 1-way traffic transition in the SW corner of Pad G needs to be better channelized and delineated. 9. No portion of the building or appurtenant structures may encroach on the City drainage and utility easement. 10. All new curb and gutter must be concrete 136-12 curb and gutter. 11. Provide better pedestrian connectivity to the internal Shingle Creek Crossing sidewalk network. 12. The trash enclosure must be better separated and protected from traffic (e.g. curb and gutter). Shingle Creek Crossing—Building Pad G site plan review Page 2 of 2 July 20, 2012 13. Provide delivery vehicle and garbage truck turning movement diagrams for the typical planned paths of each vehicle for review. 14. The civil plans must be certified by a licensed engineer in the state of Minnesota. 15. This development is required to be reviewed by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission. All City and Watershed storm drainage,treatment and infiltration standards are required to be met. Prior to Issuance of Land Alteration and Building Permits: 16. Submit a recorded copy of the restrictive covenants and subdivision agreement. 17. Submit final site plans and specifications for review and approval by the City Engineer in form and format as determined by the City. The final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan. 18. Submit a letter of credit or cash escrow for the land disturbance portion of the project in the amount of 100%of the estimated cost or in the amount determined by City staff to comply with the land alteration permit, site improvements and to restore the site. The developer may submit one itemized letter of credit, if approved by City staff. The City will not release or reduce the letter of credit or cash escrow until work has been completed according to the final site plans approved by the City. 19. A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions, traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions, tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility provisions, temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non- compliance provisions. The plan must be in a City approved format and must outline minimum site management practices and penalties for non-compliance. 20. Submit a$5,000 separate cash escrow for the construction management plan elements as part of the non-compliance provision. This escrow must be accompanied by the agreement and signed by the developer and property owner. Through this document,the developer and property owner will acknowledge: a. The property will be brought into compliance within 24 hours of notification of a violation of the construction management plan, other conditions of approval or City code standards. 21. If compliance is not achieved,the City will use any or all of the escrow dollars to correct any deficiency and/or issue. All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. The building plan must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions above. Subsequent approval of the phase 2 site plans and Land Alteration/Building permit may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-17 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-012 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK (GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) APPROVING NEW SITE AND BUILDING PLAN FOR PROPOSED BUILDING G (LOCATED ON LOT 11, BLOCK 1, SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING ADDITION— 1180 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING) WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012-012 submitted by Loren Van Der Slik(for Gatlin Development Company) requesting approval of a new Site and Building Plan for proposed Building G, located on Lot 11, Block 1, Shingle Creek Crossing Addition, and addressed as 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing, which approval is in conjunction with the ongoing improvements constructed under the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held a public meeting on August 2, 2012,to fully consider Planning Commission Application No. 2012-012, and reviewed and received a planning report on the proposed new Site and Building Plans for proposed Building G and other related improvements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Site and Building plans are consistent with the General Development Plans of the overall Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that the Site and Building Plan of proposed Building G, as comprehended under Planning Application No. 2012-012, be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The Site and Building Plan is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance; 2. The Site and Building Plan, in relation to the Planned Unit Development proposed on the Subject Site, will facilitate the redevelopment and improvement of this site,will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land; 3. The improvements and utilization of the property as proposed under the planned redevelopment of this site is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with ordinance standards; PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-17 4. The Site and Building Plan proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city; 5. The Site and Building Plan proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this proposed development can be considered an asset to the community; and 6. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating and approving a Site and Building Plan as contained in Section 35-230 (Plan Approval) of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the site proposal is,therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Planning Application No. 2012-012 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. Developer/Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer's Review memo, dated June 20, 2012, including(but not limited to): a. The two-way and one-way traffic transition in the southwest corner of the subject site need to be better channelized and delineated; and b. The trash enclosures must be better separated and protected from traffic (e.g. curb and gutters). 2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 3. The building and tenant spaces are to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing systems to meet NFPA standards and connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 4. The location or placement of any fire hydrants and other fire related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief. 5. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 6. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. The new trash enclosure with same building materials as those used to construct the 2 of 4 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-17 principal building. 7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Site Plan approval is exclusive of all final signs on this site, including new wall (building) signs, which shall remain subject to Chapter 34 of the city ordinances, and subject to the approved Signage Plan of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreements. 9. B6-12 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 10. The Developer shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 11. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center current Standard Specifications and Details. 12. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City's Engineering Department and applicant shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 13. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. 14. All other provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall remain in effect. August 2, 2012 Date Chair ATTEST: Secretary 3 of 4 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-17 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chair, Commissioners and the following voted against the same: None. whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 4 of 4 ARCHITECTURAL - CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North Third Street,Suite 220 6124364030 Minneapolis.MN 55401 Fax 612-692-9960 CD �p O GATI.IN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY —: Key Plan cG . i K L \ E \ ENAN ENA\ \. SEARS -� 200Y 201-a 200 200 a' bb0 Sr 'per I `Y NORTH Mark Revision Issue Date FLOOR PLAN I NORTH 8 20112 ,r n 22.0 ., _ 20_0, TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT \- TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SOUTH ELEVATION e NORTH ELEVATION vie- BROOKDALE CENTER - - REDEVELOPMENT �•; -- BROOKLYN CENTER, MN TENANT TENANT OUTLOT BUILDING G WEST ELEVATION 1116.=+� EAST ELEVATION 6• A6 Architectural Consortium,L.L.C.2012 _ m •y�,i g ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL L„ a STEVE U BROOKLYN MINNESOTA EWER EXTENSIONS.CONTROL AGENCY ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: PHASE o CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SANITARY SEVER E%TENSION REM,METRO °c ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CORY MATHISON 1. THE SITEWORKFOR THIS PROJECTSH4LLMEETOR ESCEEDTHE'SITE ° 8301 SHINGLE CREEL(PARKWAY POLLUTION CONTROL/NPDES SPECIFIC SPECIFICATIMS.' E BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 55430 TEDDI SEISRING (783)588-5340 520 LAFAYETTE ROAB 2. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS ANDIOR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY S. ST.PAUL,MN 55155 CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE CWPMIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR SITE(651)297-2274 TOCONTIRALTCOMPLETONMDIHEFIWILCONNECTdJKSERNCES. IMPROVEMENT PLANS STORMWATER PLANNING AND ZONING DIANE SPECTOR GARY 13ML SHINGLE CREIX WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1n COMMISSION/WENCK ASSOCIATES,INC, CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER CITY HALL THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE z 1600 PIONEER CREEK CENTER, 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT.CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL 0 5 (7 BOX 9- MAPLE PLAIN,MN SS359 BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 55430 INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. BUILDING G Sheet Index 5 (763)a9-4280 (763)560-9241 REFERENCE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY PLAN BY rr FIRE PREVENTION HEALTH DEPT. BRAUN INTERTEC DATED 05/27/2011 FOR GROUNDWATER 6010 COVER SHEET n FIRE CHIEF LEE GATLIN BRIAN NOMA EWATERING REQUIREMENTS. OVERALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION E BROOKLYN CENTER FIRE CHIEF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 6020 6645 HUMBOLT AVENUE NORTH ENVI RONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION FOR CONTROL PLAN PHASE 1 BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 55430 625 NORTH ROBERT STREET (763)549-3600 P.O.BOX 64975 OVERALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION FAX(763)561-0717 ST.PAUL,MN 55164 ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 6021 CONTROL PLAN PHASE 2 Z (651)201-a7ao GOPHER STATE CALL ONE BUILDING DIVISION HENNEPIN COi1NTY MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 6022 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION R. < ROBERT MANOR ROBERT BIERS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING CONTROL DETAILS INTERIM BUILDING OFFICIAL SENIOR TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-00024.° ° BUILDING k COMMUNITY STANDARDS HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORMS 6030 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN r'�9 E 8301 SHINGLE TER, PARKWAY MEDI A,MRIE DRIVE 6040 OVERALL SITE PLAN ^ BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 55430 MEONA,MN 55340 (763)569-3330 (612)596-0359 y E FAX(763)561-0]17 FAX: (763)476-4000 6043 SITE PLAN i `�$ LOCATED AT 6050 OVERALL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN ❑ rr:. S�Ef 6053 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN XERXES AVENUE NORTH AND COUNTY ROAD 10 6060 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN PROJECT TEAM BROOKLYN CENTER MINNESOTA 6063 UTILITY PLAN ❑ 1 6080 OVERALL PHOTOMETRICS PLAN k OWNER/DEVELOPER ARCHITECT CIVIL ENGINEER 6083 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN °m ' LOREN K.VAN DER SLIK KATHY ANDERSON,AIA WILLIAM D.MATZEK,P.E. SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 118N, RANGE 21W 6101 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. X c Q _ 888 LASOLASBLVD.ST600 901 NORTH THIRD STREET,SUITE 220 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST,SUITE PARCEL ID# — 03-118-21-41-0024 02-118-21-32-0009, 02-118-21-32-0010 6104 LANDSCAPE PLAN cs= wp 0 A FORT LAUDERDALE,FL33301 MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55401 SAINT PAUL,MINNESOTA 55114 f FAX(954)300 FAX FAX 651)645-5116 7 02-118-21-31-0056, 02-118-21-31-0055, 02-118-21-32-0014 'w x 'a FAX(954)3024901 FAX(612)692-9960 FAX(851) N i LO CAL CONTACT 916-59 RICH KAUFFMAN O 02118 21 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT - - -23-0023, 02-118-21-32-0017, 03-118-21-14-0021 � CELL(812)916-5913 JACKOLYN CO K-HA%BV,AIA E INFRASERCTURE,IRONMENT,B TODD HALUNEN,RLA 03-118-21-14-0032, 02-118-21-32-0011, 02-118-21-31-0049 £ INFRASTRUCTURE,LLC KIMLEY-HORN ANDASSOCIATES,INC. oa 60 EAST PLAT BLVD.,SUITE 300 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST,SUITE 238N v 5 SAINT PAUL'M INNESOTA 55107 SAINT PAUL,MINNESOTA 55114 �� a �0 (651)209-2873 (651)64501W >w FAX(651)7783911 FAX(651)645-5116 m GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER ENVIRONMENTAL/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Q Q ° w 15 ¢ ^ 3 > T;oDI� STEVE MARTIN.P.E. JIM DELUCA I GREGG KRUSE O S9th AVE. Wan g E BRAUN NTERTEC CORPORATION BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Z U 5® NOR ¢tea$ o Q § on O Ty 45.HILLSVIEW RD. 1826 BUERKLE ROAD 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE SOUTH - J U C] WAY DR. 0 3 3 g SAINT PAUL,MN 55110 MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55438 PROJECT LOCATION = yWj - (651)4873245 (952)995-2000 AVE. N FAX(651)487-1812 FAX(952)995-2020 RANCE PL Ty o p J z m � ¢ DO �-'5 wa m 57th AV. Q z< ° ` BURQUES LA. a 0 0= 56 th 1rs DR. 56th AVE. o AVE O,FSYH' 5 z UTILITY RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX FOR THIS PROJECT Z ECKBERG DR. 2 pQ E RICON� DR. i UTILITY/ GOVERNING CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY OTHERS RESPONSIBIUMES a AGENCIES CONTACTS p�' z U CENTERPOINT ENERGY 6 A V () �' z 55th AVE. N. 11 1 COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION ACTNTES KITH GAS GAS LINE DEMOUTON WILL BE GONE BY GAS COMPANY,GAS O 55th -) W jn 700 UNDEN,P.O.BOX 1185 COMPANY TO ENSURE DEMOLITION OF GAS UNE IS 7 55th MINNEAPOLIS MN 55404 COMPANY TO LOCATE AND STAKE EXISRNG GAS PIPING TO J Z CAS CONTACT:BERNICE TiOFNNES COMPLETED PRIOR TO ANY OTHER DEMOLITION AND TO REMAIN PRIOR TO CONTRACTOR STARING ANY OEMIXITON. co ENSURE INSTAUATON OF GAS LINES ARE COMPLETE SERVICE FROM THE POINT OF CONNECTION AT THE EXISTING UNE 54th AV O d d — J ¢ ¢ c 54th< A (612)342-5123 PRIOR TO PAVING OR CURB PLACEMENT. O C' 0 UP TO AND INCLUDING SETTING OF METER WILL BE BY d U CENTERPOINT ENERGY. rd PL. N O� % .� W W Z W p < v' ANY RELOCATIONS OF EX15 ING WILL BE DONE BY CENTDRPOINT LILAC DR. w U r, N Of Q71EST/CIXTJRTONN COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITH ANY RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES WILL BE 53rd AVE. N. l7- 53rd D AV Ea O Z 0 L\LI °- 2800 WAYZATA BOULEVARD ROOM 300 TELEPHONE COMPANY TO ENSURE INSTALLATION OF DONE BY OVIEST. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 UNDERGROUND LINES ARE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PRIOR TO BACKFILUNG THE TRENCH.OWEST TO P�3 W Z CONTACT:CHRISTY ALLGOOD ASPHALT OR CURB PLACEMENT. INSPECT AND APPROVE THE INSTALLATION OF W > CABLE/ (612)381-5563 PROVIDE AND INSTALL 2-4'SCHEDULE 40 PVC CABLE. < Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z lij Z O 1n -' CONDUITS WITH PULL ROPES,INCLUDING ALL OWEST WILL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL MATERIALS Z > TELEPHONE 0 ¢ 52 nd AV E. N. z 5 TRENCHING AND BACKFILLING,FROM THE RIGHT OF NEEDED TO ESTABLISH PRIMARY SERVICES FROM 'S Z S?nd AVE. < N V Q WAY TO THE BUILDING. POINT OF CONNECTION AT THE EXISRNG UNE UP 1 O J d - PROVIDE AND INSTALL PULL BOXES AS PER TO THE JUNCTION BOX. N TELEPHONE COMPANY REQUIREMENTS XCEL ENERGY COORDINATE CO451RUCTON ACTINTES WITH ELECTRIC XCEL WILL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL MATERIALS NEEDED TO `,I I A I I� y 8701 MONTICELLO LANE COMPANY TO ENSURE INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND ESTABLISH PRIMARY OVERHEAD/UNDERGROUND SERVICE .. v I V c MAPLE GROVE,MN 55369 LINES ME COMPLETED PRIOR TO ASPHALT OR CURB FROM POINT O CONNECTION AT THE EXISRNG UNE UP TO CONTACT:ROBERT TORRES PLACEMENT. THE TRANSFORMER. m ELECTRIC (783){93-1671 PROVIDE MD INSTALL CONDUITS WITH PULL ROPES, XCEL WILL PROVIDE AND INSTALL PRIMARY CABLE FOR ALL N.T.S. ¢ INCLUDING TRENCHING AND BACXFILLING. UNDERGROUND LINES UP TO THE TRANSFORMER. o L CONSTRUCT/INSTALL TRANSFORMER PAD AS PER THE ANY RELOCATION OF EXISTING UNES OR POLES WILL BE O • XCEL SPECIFICATIONS-PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL DONE BY XCEL ENERGY. N j SECONDARY SERVICE AND MATERIALS RELOCATI ON COSTS SHALL BE PAID BY THE GENERAL 'Z Z W 5 CONTRACTOR AND REIMBURSED BY OWNER AT FACE VALUE. PREPARED BY: Z E CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROVIDE AND INSTALL SANITARY SEWER UNES AND REWIRED INSPECTIONS AND APPROVALS WILL BE LL UI U Z 6301 ENGIN SHIN NG DEPARTMENT ASSOCIATED APPURTENANCES PER THE PLANS MO DONE BY THE TER AND FOR THE CITY OF ❑_❑ IGmley-Horn Z ° 8301 LYN CE CREEK PARKWAY ALL PUCARONS. BROOKLYN CENTER AND THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. ` BROOKLYN TEVER,LE 55470 ALL L BE R PRIVATE BROOKLYN SEWER LINES a S SANITARY CONTACT:STEVE LILLEHAUG SHALL BE PER CITY OF BR001(LYN CENTER and�1LLs,�s,,o,�c,,.,gyypp�� D SEWER (783)589-3310 COORDINATE G11LM fWlArlalWl Inc. U 0 ° COORDINATE REWIRED INSPECTION SERVICES WITH LLI J • ENGINEER OF RECORD AND CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER `' ¢ S UTUTES DEPARTMENT.SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR he U m r REQUIREMENTS. LLI w ° PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL WATER MAINS AND L b CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ASSOCIATED APPURTENANCES PER THE PLANS AND REWIRED INSPECTIONS AND APPROVALS WILL BE d ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS. DOME BY THE INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF J (� 0 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER MAINS SHAD.BE PER BROOKLYN CENTER AND THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. Y BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 55430 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER REQUIREMENTS. CONTACT:STEVE ULLEHAUG ALL PORTIONS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION WATER Z z WATER WQ (763)569-3340 SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED BY A LICENSED FIRE J O ° SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR. Z °c ALL TORTONI OF OTHER NON FIRE PROTECTION GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Z m a Z RELATED LINES MAY R INSTALLED O THE < ° PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. j COORDINATE REWIRED INSPECTION SERVICES WITH Q, > 5 ENGINEER OF RECORD AND CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Z Lu W UTUTES DEPARTMENT.SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR Z REQUIREMENTS. NOTE U) U JI 2 3 j CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL STORM SEVER LINES AND REWIRED INSPECTIONS AND APPROVALS WILL BE PLEASE REFER TO THE FOLLOWING REPORTS PREPARED BY BRAUN j ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ASSOCIATED AP PURTENANCES PER THE PLANS AND DONE BY TIE INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF INTERTEC CORPORATION FOR GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION: DATE 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY SPEORCARDNS. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 06/28/2012 STORM BROOKLYN CENTER.(IF REWIRED)ENGINEER OF Y SEWER BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 55430 REFER TO SPECIFICARONS AND GRADING PLAN FOR RECORD,MD OTHER MPUCABLE AGENCIES. WAL-MART STORE 95625-00 DATED MAY 26,2011 PROJECT NO. .. CONTACT:STEVE ULLEHAUG INFORMATION ON ALLOWABLE STORM SEWER MATERIALS. GEOTECHNICAL EVALUTTON REPORT (78J)589-3J40 160633001 E o SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING DATED JUNE 8,2011 E SHEET NUMBER THIS MATRIX HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE MY AN0 ALL APPURTENANCES,TRENCHING AND 6010 BACKFILIv AND OTHER INCIDENTALS TO MEET OR EXCEED THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE ITEMS USTED. 0 D € 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 LU DEVELOPER/OWNER: CITY OF BROOKLYN > p. G TUN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,INC. CENTER: A 888 LAS BLAB BLVD.ST 600 F CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FL 33301 (ORT LAUDERDALE . . . . . . 00 ..... .... 954)302-5900 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PKWY 2 J-X-w�� BROOKLYN CENTER,MN$5430 TOR�' BASS SITE OPERATOR/GENERAL CONTRACTOR: COUNTY RD NO-10- ASS LAKE ROAD_ COUNT RD NO 1 BASS LAKE,SrOA ,[-7t ---------- B dp VICINITY MAP,U56S QUAD MAP,--AT-TIME tSI SCHEDULE,ALL GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT f CONTROL NOTES,MAINTENANCE NO AN SEQUENCE NOTES ARE ON SHEET 6022- EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS. v x L \ THE PRIII CE OF GROUNDWATER IHOUL X, JILBRE�ALL INCLUDE OVNblUtHAIIVN FOR AD NO FLOOD ZONE NOTE: 0 THE PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE SITUATED IN COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 270151 0212 E,REVISION DATE E H *. D SEPTEMBER 02.2004. 2 E Z ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 0 120 240 GOPHER STATE CALL ONE A MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 SCALE FEET SO BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY ........ o E CONTFtACTOR TO COORDINATE PHASING 01 1- /V WITH THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. Ip lot,I CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN ALL WORK WITHIN a s THE-.1.OF DISTURBANCE,-11.IN-11 <s i LJ STORAGE OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RETURNING ALL AREAS AFFECTED BY WORK TO A C-0,11- `RIPMEN AS GOOD AS EXISTING OR BETTERgo N Z V E p ON-SITE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO END AT F CIO THE PROPERTY LINE.REINFORCED SILT FENCE Z� I SITE FEATURE; DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW GS;E'CTECOZT IN'S�D`E­TW`RR'0`FERTY LINE AND 0 TSIDE OF ALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. FASTING LINES ARE OFFSET FOR CLARITY. 3 WALMART zit x.xxs p H2 j --------- LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN ­ G O PROPERTY LINE ...... PROPOSED UNITS OF DISTURBANCE-PHASE 11 O EXIST NO BUILDING EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS v f H FLOOD ZONE X(PANEL NO 2701510212E) EXISTING SEARS W FLOOD ZONE AE(PANEL NO.2701510212E) z z rlp�m < 0 0 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT z 11 IP o - a F/5 z 0 0 < ACREAGE SUMMARY - PROJECT Z EROSION DETAILS LLI LLl a- b X- PHASE 11 (AT TOTAL BUILD-OUT) (TO NEAREST QUARTER ACRE.PER MN GENERAL PERMIT) SWPPP INFORMATION SIGN lw TOTAL PROJECT AREA Sim J Q 0 RSF ON SI - TE DISTURBED AREA INLET PROTECTION SEDIMENT CONTROL < W 01.25 Off-SITE Di J STURSED AREA () ® TREE PROTECTION FENCE W co TOTAL DISTJFBEO AREA(MUST MATCH NOI) 54.75 z IMPERVIOUS AREA AT COMPLETION 44.25 > 0 - CONSTRUCTION EXIT PERVIOUS/SEEDED AREA AT COMPLETION 1050 0 DIVERSION DIKE.ALL DIVERSIONS TO BE IN PLACE AND STABILIZED PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK.DIVERSION TO BE RECONSTRUCTED AS NECESSARY TO CONTROL STORMWATER ONCE CONSTRUCTION HAS COMMENCED. 0 V) z wz TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP K z E ms\I V\ 2 ROCK CHECK DAM 0 LU PROPOSED REINFORCED SILT FENCE Z Fn FILTREXX SEDIMENT CONTROL U 0 C) *NO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC"SIGN LLI z co W CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FENCE Lu > OFF-SITE MATERIAL AREA0 INFORMATION FLOATING SILT CURTAIN 04 S 0 Lu >- ............i PERMANENT SODDING Lij 0 (n z BORROW SITE NAME: DISPOSAL SITE NAME; 0 PERMANENT SEEDING < Z =() 0� 0 (-) BORROW SITE ADDRESS: DISPOSAL SITE ADDRESS: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET z EL BORROW SITE PERMIT HOLDER: DISPOSAL SITE PERMIT HOLDER; w o M RIP-RAP PAD z z JI 5 BORROW SITE PERMIT NO! DISPOSAL SITE PERMIT NO: I., 3 PG BORROW SITE PERMITTING DATE AGENCY: DISPOSAL SITE PERMITTING AGENCY. 05/28/2012 1) CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL IN BORROW AND DISPOSAL INFORMATION ABOVE. PROJECT NO. ) 2 BORROW AND DISPOSAL INFORMATION I NEEDED FOR SOIL FILL AND SPOIL MATERIALS ONLY. 160633001 E 3) CONTRACTOR SHAD STATE'NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT"OF ONE OR BOTH ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR PROJECT. 1. SHEET NUMBER E N 6021 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 - m m _ .F�-.=.__..._.._.-----°--•`---._�.,.,.,.�:::_:$:. ---------�..a°-=1?:-���..._�s��s:..:.tt.:.:�.�.a t �>.J�_x,i.�� � �� � SITE LEGEND o `a .¥-._-••'•' X13{RWt MONU �� # O J _ AO 60'STANDARD PARKING SPACE DIMENSION 9.5'>t 18'(TYP.) NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD 0 BO MATCH EXIS NG CURB AND CUTTER s BUILDING SETBACK I _ _ 10 UTILITY EASEMENT 20 �• EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN EXISTING M011UMENT •U o•'••-• O PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK 6'WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5 -� - 7 "-' �.���-.rte°- - T^"+y LL °-f 0 60 120 I ` OAND MINNESOTA PARKING SPACE(TYP.)PER FEDERAL ADA STANDARDS(2010) r __ J ..._ _ .. _... _ _ -_ AND MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE(2007). B SCALE FEET ]y ` OPAINTEO DIRECTIONAL ARROW(TYP.) Z T 1_I -t �_1 __— 1 '' F ENCLOSU .9 \' e I O_STOP_PAINTED MITE ON PAVEMENT. 5 9 i I ' ih1__��'1 \ @STOP SIGN 30•X30•(R1-1)AND W16-7P(TYP.) .e I '\ I I -'`-'-•�, I 1 j ' '', SITE KEY HO PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGN 30•X30•(W11-2)(TYP.) N.T.S. O g0-STANDARD PARKING SPACE DIMENSION 9•X18•(TYP.) O60'STANDARD PARKING SPACE DIMENSION 9'X18'(TYP.) ,.11 C \ 1 Y B � 1 E%$TNG FAIN O DO NOT ENTER SIGN. Z 1 ROEN('P) 1` e 0 • pp A SYMBOL LEGEND: e ��\"` b V ..c--.:... ._ y}'-..r :•- 55 OL NOT USED.., 2 25' I a \ PROPERTY LINE l' F■♦ PR M NOT USED rd v U- a TRIAN-LEVEL LIGHTING(SEE D p ) ' / 1j{1) (, \� PLAN FOR FIXTURE LEGEND)OPOSED LIGHT POLE LIGHTING O �./1 - �� ` PROPOSED PEDES NO AREA STRIPED AT SYSL/4'AT 4S'O 2.O.C. o a a I -+�' Y \' �\,\ LIGHTING PLAN FOR FIXUTRE LEGEND) @ NOT USED. IV oH.� D _ d 1\\\ C STANDARD PARKING STALL Op NOT USED. .y� B - •- ,� UTILITY EASEMENT r `, 9@ PROPOSED PARKING SPACES(YELLOW STRIPING) @ NOT USED. ❑ p�2 DRAINAGE ..+W� \ 5-i'NGLEN\\' .i FIRE HYDRANT SEE UTILITY PLAN AND DETIALS. ®NOT USED. " of 6 FOOT CHAIN LANK FENCE. ® @ NOT USED. t' q b q 4= \ +� \\ ADA STRIPING O NOT USED. ❑ PROPOSED CURB @ PROPOSED TYPE M.DOT 6618 CURB. ` VO NOT USED. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT m E ����� �i \ �~ �✓ OW 10'WIDE RAISED CROSSWALK. r �. o fi e \. `% \- ,.% O ADA CURB RAMP, <�° a �•° O 3 \ \ i / OPROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN.REFER TO CATLIN DEVELOPMENT if 219 4i �•.. t'R' , \ i f ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ueiy< 0_ DRAINAGE a u Ir E'>EMEr / ���° w y\ \ (VARIA WDTH) (D INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISL/WD. O ago€ F 3 PAVEMENT HATCH LEGEND: m�� o E `i \ ` 0 \```\ PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT i i NT PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE o ea° \ Ty B \` j \ 1k'•i E \Y �._. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK ie,s < G ° ` PROPOSED PATIO AREA PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP AREA 16,TRAL a \\;V' p b \ q` EASEMEN i \ V RAINAD k UTILIT b V T ,�•\ < �y d EASE \ _ SITE PLAN NOTES \ THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD 1. CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY CORNERS \ BE \ .•'� \ ANTICIPAlEO ON THIS PROJECT.CONTRACTOR'S V BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR 2 PAVEMENT TO SEXISTINGAIN GRADE PROPOSED D ALIGNMENT. D GUTTER,CONCRETE AND \ ':\ Y T ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE.REFERENCE THE ` _ CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY PLAN BY BRAUN 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE < $ \\ \\ `V\ .I INTERTEC DATED 05/27/2011 FOR WITH SPECIFICATIONS. Z GROUNDWATER DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS. d \�\ / 1 ' 4. THE EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN `��` / ACCORDANCE WTH SPECIFICATIONS. FJ 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND Ly SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS,PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT LLI \' 60'NO-BUILD- S. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES F `-� `:) \ EASEMENT /' f GOPHER STATE CALL ONE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,ADJUSTMENT OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS W Y.� �`;'' //= ` / DESIGNATED ON PLANS, l^ ++' r/ MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 V/ ` BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALL ABOVE TYAN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 GROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES IN DRIVE AREAS. EXISTING DUAL / €_ TRAIL Q b Y' \, l j PRIVATE BOX /,+ f / /ASEMENT B. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR j \\V \ CULVERTS / / / ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES.TO INCLUDE.SANITARY SEWER N j `1\ / // LATERALS,DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE,ELECTRICAL,NATURAL GAS AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF d `` . UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER AR % �1 / DEPTH5 E ACHIEVED.AS WELL AS COORDINATE WTH ANY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES Q 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY NTH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED /l1 O / TO SAME. V V) K c '\\ UTLITy EA MEMO ///o`+ 10 ITEM DURING CONSTRUCTION.RESPONSIBLE SUCH AS.ABUTGNOT THE LIMITED O,DRAINAGE.UTILITIES. ''/^V L/ ? `I ` tl PAVEMENT,STRIPING,CURB,ETC.REPAIRS SHALL BE EQUAL T0,OR BETTER THAN, �V'^/ w E \ ` / \ \ EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE TO DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING V ? ' / DAMAGE AND NOTIFY WALMART CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION W SITE DATA TABLE START. Q H Z 6 0 'M' 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT AS NECESSARY ON ALL LIGHT POLE BASES, 1/.yL Y c 4 \ 'H / / BUILDING DESIGNATION LOT AREA BUILDING PARrc1rvc PROVIDED RATIO FIRE HYDRANTS AND CURBS YMICH ARE CURRENTLY PAINTED. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. •--( m F \\ LOT II,BLODKI 1.M ACRES BAM .:PACES ]AB W ji'/ TOTAL 1.w ACRE6 BA3050.Ff WSPACES T,M 13.CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE,WHEN APPLICABLE,ALL EXISTING `- I/ ♦ BUILDINGS.FOUNDATIONS.BASEMENTS,CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS.DRAIN PIPES. W Z U Z ,��\'-•,. � ///X ( SANITARY SEWER PIPES,POWER POLES, WIRES,AND GUY RES.WATER METERS AND WATER LINES,WELLS,SOEWALKS,SIGN POLES,UNDERGROUND GAS.SEPTIC TANKS �W 1 AND O L n \\V/j / I ( _ NEEDED,IDUALLOW SHOWN FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION WTHIN SHOWN. _j IJMITS AND WERE LL `J' N 1/.CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL,STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN i W F}- DISPOSING OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE, W O Z O o° 15.ALL PAINT USED FOR PARKING STRIPING SHALL BE PER CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER //JFF�i O Q O Z °c i/ gJ(I l." SPECIFICATIONS. `M TU T U ° �\ %g�,:• i6.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ME TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. Z m a d ov' 17.CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION PLAN FOR RELOCATIONS = w AND ADDITIONS. Z JI 19,PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEET THE CITYS CODES AND ALL W 3 - APPLICABLE BUILDNG CODES IN EFFECT AT THE TIME. DATE E 05/28/2012 PROJECT NO z E - 160633001 E SHEET NUMBER N a 6043 a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 - m 2 0 o f / "_- I ANTICIPATEDON�H CONSIUECTELONIRALD ORES p� - E / - _ ---- -�m�- _ BID SHALL INCLUDE NISI CONSIDERATION GTH V -� _ __- __ _ - NORTH ApNSTRU TION C ISSUE.REFERENCE LAN BY B —� _� ,, Is� -• --- -- �. �\ CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY P Y BRAUN 1 �( a--O = � C' INTERTEC DATED 05/27/2011 FOR �„ Uo•'•••••�• /` •D� � L-. I¢r�Y- �� • __ :. _ �" � GROUNDWATER DEWATERING REWIREMENTS '\v\:3!/�• c "�"'- ,�"•a,_-•''�'>.. I > >—fs-`'J >'._.......P OH > ..> P`lh - -A�>OH— P OH 9-�F OF'_ _ Ya .___'- - "01- - 0 60 120 B - RD N040_ ASS LAKE ROAD \\ g / T i it T \ ; °_ �"� \ \ \ SCALE FEET \ - Q ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT vl GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TO FREE 1-800-252-1166 9 I I / - "" _.>,,,..,� •� - __ BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGIN 1� o SITE KEY 1v •° �I-f` TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 N.T.S. C 8% -I - \ w� it �� � z � / I F.F.E.=851.0 / I 851.0 p� F.F.E.=850. \� \ LEGEND �� E ;\\ ' \�., ,,. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT` o � z _4 1 I fRs O D a \ I A 9 4 \ �.. \ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE �M 5085 E% 0} I f /\h/ * PROPERTY LINE 1 EXISTING CONTOURS � n � \ % ,�,, '' - .:_ _ ���r 1l+/ / � -g'`I.,��• � � PROPOSED CONTOURS X. PROPOSD PRIVATE STORM SEWER \`S'. ---____- PROPOSED PRIVATE 8"PERFORATED PVC PIPE k' PROPOSED STORM SEWER INUET p \\ \\ - / •' •/.• // -••-i s I .� \\ \\ ` \�{ + t. }G(' PROPOSED STORM SEWER MANHOLE k N E / •I /'/�� PROPOSED FLARED END 6ECTION Nil '\ vN \ �\ pbM// ® PROPOSED RIP RAP .F.E.=847.0 \\\ \\ }` 1 fy m EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE Z c : ` Q EXISTING STORM SEWER INIET Q ��� C z \ \ \ —>—>`- EXISTING STORM SEWER g F /// �,�— F.F.E.=esos \ \ V I A\V\V A •� � V / / \ EDF_ \\�\ EMERGENCY OVERFLOW AND ELEVATION $ y� 4���, .�•� l 1` J I \ I \ \ fj�n .,.,- DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW a § m a 6 OI \ Y / l \\\ x\ ,w ` I / / I I \ \ F `�� HP HIGH PNT p LP LOW PUNT ` `\\ / �,`\\\\•\\\\ 'a` l� Y m ME MATCH EXISTING �3y0= O \ \ :5 \\ �L �`�\\\ F.F.E.=847.7 5. v ` Fy` A // NIL / \f\V \; \� \ \ a H a > z g$ \ \5041 Ex �. J \ DRAINAGE SCHEDULE 0 INVERT PIPE PIPE INVERT PIPE PIPE Z STRUCTURE STRUCTURE RIM/GRATE ELEVATION SIZE SLOPE ELEVATION SIZE SLOPE NOTES o \� \� + T\I \ ��\ II 1 N0. TYPE ELEVATION IN a IN IN OUT OUT OUT Q SD61(EX) CB ( 841.992 N 839.20 24• 0.505 C v ' J E 841.46 18' 0.755 `�(f 1e i \ O / SD65(EX) MH 850.194 N 843.52 IS° 1.005 SW 841.46 24• 0.755 A Q < / \ \ \ W 844.61 IB° 1.Oox Z \ b Q / '"� n� N 847.75 IS° 1.Do% SDe7(EX) GRATE 844.8]3 S 840.09 24' 0.505 A NQN/ Q ))�• N 840.59 16° 0.645 V < b \\; \-; III \ 0~ �� SD73(EX) MH 850.533 W 844.95 15' 0.755 E 844.95 18• 1.0ox d J \F\ SD77(EX) CB 847.897 S 843.78 15' 1.005 N 843.78 15° 1 1.50% A N \ty� +• '/ / P/ /�//69 SD216 co 847.910 N 84197 15° 1 1.005 \ \ ,,i' '�///F j j SD217 GRATE 847.190 E 843.19 15 1.0 Ox � \ ( I,' �. / 1 j�/ SD218 CB 849.028 E 845.63 IS' 0.755 Q s0219 CB 849.235 w 845.19 z oox s 545.18 15• 1.005 15 /� \ .1 ///�r' SD220 MH 851.088 S 846.01 10' 1.005 E 846.01 12° 1.0ox (D N W K c ' \ \ /�+ //I ✓�'� / / A:CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE Z \ /i r 1/ ' / � / / B: CONSTRUCT OVER EXISTING PIPE (n \ \ / / C: REPLACE EXISTING CASTING WITH NEENAH 81733-8 z \ v Y1 t �/ l / /�. 0O � Z LLB z m o L V Y C ` "w• /iei�/ %/ w0WZ O U \ z y Q/ / P2 / o i /j Z m Z a - /Q" / 0- f z o cn W - =(� DATE i I 06/28/2072 I PROJECT NO. E / 760633001 E N c SHEET NUMBER o 6053 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 P ED ° a m A ._..::___ _ .-a—.-aPi.=Pa• as .-w P.0 - �D NO 10 ASS LAKE ROAD ° ° �---�--r-------$F--- - ----.----sue`-- ".-""°- -------- D 60 120 -- ---------s------- --�-----M-- ------------------------------------------------�--®------ a - _ ---- ----- ---—�—_ -- ---------------- —�---��—�—_ SCALE FE- ET � z O SITE KEY D F p—w-• ' "y{ j 11 j N.T.S. G I 1 C a�\ 53LF-6•PVC O 1.002 \ t � , - z Cl�\° L0_2 I I �, �t "\; UTILITY LEGEND v-• I •�\N 6"SANITARY SEWER LATERAL AT MINIMUM 1.9Z SLOPE.COORDINATE WITH `a �\��,\w` 16LF-fi"PVC O 1.009. 1` 11` ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. E -j;�\/ Y ( CONNECT TO I \� 1 I GAS ENTRY WITH GAS METER.CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ^k CONNECT TO II \\ :,i, O PIPE BOLLARD PROTECTION AT METER.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE gb.T6 >., �'•� EXISTING B43.29•PVC WATER 6- \ E WITH GAS COMPANY FOR TYING OF INDIVIDUAL METER. 1R�: m •\ I .i 'i , N••', .�• �, \\ \\+r'L s \` \.,` CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH GAS COMPANY j a ,� I _ •��--' R � - Y-• °• '� t C REGARDING WE SIZE AND INSTALLATION OF GAS SERVICE LINE.THE GAS Yet D '--"--•°-•�-- ~ ---_ — __ -='1I�•� I �� •�\ \tt `\• O COMPANY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE GAS SERVICE � ! fr `\\\`` � i•�t - �-{.- 1--� • \� \t \�, FROM THE DISTRIBUTION MAIN,UP TO A INCLUDING THE GAS METER.THE G %-J�` ��.' -A4 MI- P r I \ I ��� '• \ \t CONTRACTOR 15 REPSONSIBLE FOR ALL GAS SERVICE INSTALLATION AFTER G THE METER. W 4 DRAINAGE ANp ` O CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE WITH THE TELEPHONE ❑ c . UTILITY EASEMENT COMPANY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TELEPHONE 5ERVICE.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL CONDUIT,PULL WIRES, pRAINAGE AND AND PULL BOXES FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. 3 TLITY EASEMEN T TELEPHONE COMPANY WILL PULL WIRES FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE.TH i W (V_V) CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE E TYING OF PROPOSED TELEPHONE E \ ENTRY TO THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS.ALL PULL BOXES LOCATED IN PAVED m O AREAS SHALL BE H-20 HEAVY DUTY BOXES.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE r \ DUAL PRIVATE I \ •I` Fxr/ RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE SIZE AND NUMBER OF CONDUITS - € u) BOX CULVERTS - I jj REQUIRED. ° <�a6 LJ II \ �•,� \, T ® CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE WITH THE POWER COMPANY g d Y 4 I 'P '• WITH INSTALLATION AND LOCATION OF TRANSFORMER.CONTRACTOR SHALL 7-�+ 'Q \�,4. /���� \ ..*L� \ \ BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE PAD.CONDUIT FROM aj> w ° 1.. _\•` II I� \I . • � \, ( PAD TO BUILDING AND PIPE BOLLARDS AS REQUIRED K THE POWER i \I(T//�i/1 ` COMPANY.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE SAID WORK WITH POWERoo€ /♦� - II I T t. COMPANY.TRANSFORMER LOCATION CANNOT CONFLICT WITH TRUCK ACCESS a�<o •C j E \•\, I�� A �'� �� I / / \ ` , t ?; TO DOCK DOOR. E F S / \ >�Z DOMESTIC WATER UNE ENTRY.METER AND REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW �m�z O O c \ ` 4 6"WAIERMAIN \ F PREVENTER LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE °() Q- LEGEND \ \ A 1 �I STUB RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ANY APPURTENANCES ON THE DOMESTIC �N '0 8 D -t�` ' I LINE SUCH AS SACKFLOW PREVENTOR,GATE VALVES,ETC..WHICH MAY BE > O FUME OEVELOPMENT .`'` \ \`� CDNN T TO I I \' PR TE \�'``,` REWIRED.CONTRACTOR TO COOfR01NATE WITH CITY OF BROCKLYN CENTER IM �W CN $ �, \ V i ' E%ISTIe� STA IT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.CONTRACTOR SHALL REF.ARCH PLANS FOR Fated •( lN p o -.---.-------.- PROPOSED EASEMENT �t`tt \ :'! W R I I \ 6'WATERMAIN STUB OIHE ) �, \ EXACT LOCATIONS OF DOMESTIC WATER ENTRY,BACKFLOW PREVENTER ANp � j� ` I I \ `` \ \ METER. >3 �w O ---- PROPERTY UxEy t` \ VV SEWER/WATER SEWER/ytORM I \� `�,`�` w 5 ` VV, \ ` CROSSING } 6"SPRINKLER ENTRY.DOUBLE DETECTOR BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATED W o —cal-UC— urvoERGRDUnD TELEPHONE , \ \ ` CR053MG I 1 SEWER/WATER `�\ X `v �'`t O INSIDE THE BUIDLING.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO INSTALL ANY - LM G E —Pw UNDERGROUND ELECTNIC/POWER �1vL`\\\ \•, , / I� I II \ CROSSING \ \� APPURTENANCES ON THE SPRINKLER LINE SUCH AS,BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ¢y°XniS o -------- UNDERGROUND CONDUIT '\tt:•x, \`, , I MH- 2 \/ '\ }�A \` iP A DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK BACKFLOW PREVENTON DEVICE,IN SERIES ,',\;\ �� WITH A CHECK VALVE,POST INDICATOR VALVE,TAMPER SWITCH,GATE z $PNITARY SEWER BPE V'\� \ ` \ SEWER/WATER C T TO VALVES,ETC..MEETING LOCAL WATER DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS.REF. V U O ° J( �� \ CRDSSIN ARCH.PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION OF SPRINKLER ENTRY AND BACKFLOW O> >3 PRIVATE x•WATER PIPING ` \`: \ I ` 4•PtNIVA a� \`EXI\ 8" t ; PREVENTER. 2 m > m F rc —cW—FMS— GAS PIPING \ N 0 �M NI\ PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT AND ASSEMBLY,TYPICAL AS INDICATED.SEE BO%ryi. I ``II I` ® DETAIL SHEET. J i FORCE MAW \ /�) n STORM SEWER PIPE SEWER/WATER i I\ nX GALE VALVE IN VALVE BOX TN—BE H2O CRO�SEJNG H N• TRAFFlC RATED N PAVEMEn AREAS) \{, \ fiS`PRIVATE SANITARY R FIRE HYDRANT ` �,�.�...�... li ���'� SEWER STUB - _ IE:84 TUB I NW REDUCER fit` NI 6"WATERMAIN STUB \\• • POST INDICATOR VA ` \ SANITAAT SEWER MANHOLE g d A W a CAN-DUT Z O srST,.-.sEV¢p sn:ucnr+E RL_ POWER Pole \ A / $ ©- ` GAS METER BOLLARD PIPE SEWER/WATER PU.)G 'm r a U TRANSFORMER PAD MTH BaIARO PROncnw SANITARY SEWER BUILDING CONNECTION ° PEDESTRIAN-LEVEL UGHTPOLE AND BASE �4 •i / � 1=/1 - .' SIH(1E Fl%TIRE UGHT POLE AND BASE \t\ \ // // BUIDING DESIOMTON BULDINB PIF IDSH�ED TERN ELEVATION Z S ■--. 2 FIXNNE UGHT POLE AND BASE \ \t I / / J r \\°� \t , / �. // B a.4zo s¢FT. Bs,.00 eu.m s FIxnRE ucHr POLE AND BASE N B Q SANI TP TARY SEWER SUCNPE INDICATOR , ( ( O• / PROPOSED PRIVATE uFT sr4nan \ i I• ( /// . FASTING G PIPING 1 O °u m V W S m° .......-..-........._.•..-.....—... FATIG SrgRM SEWER \\ t V t \ t 4X / W ON EASMNG STARY Z EXISTING URGROUND ELECTRC Z SANITARY MANHOLE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE /Ny C7 z EXISTING COMMUNIGAnONS I.L z E INVERT INVERT LLI (' -.......................... EXISTING EASEMENT \ , ELEVATION ELEVATION O F- z I ? \ 1 I I / STRUCTURE STRUCTURE RIM/GRATE � � N0. TYPE ELEVATION IN OUT w Z 0 MH-201 MH 851.11 NE 838.55 NW 838.45 U LLI J p e CONTRA�7\[].�t \) / ✓/ ( MH-202 MN 846.36 E 862.86 SW 842.]4 Y U rc TO UTI E II!\ Z j : 'LLACE /, ( i� LLI m w $ 1-L. , W L g "A 1 Y CV Lu THE } p ANTICIPATED ON THOS UNDWATE CONTRACTOR'S E SANITARY CLEANOUT STRUCTURE SCHEDULE Lu O ° 810 SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR Q O z ° (� ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE.REFERENCE THE INVERT INVERT STRUCTURE RIM/GRATE _ F/ CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY PLAN BY BRAUN ELEVATION ELEVATION Z m Z INTERTEC DATED 05/27/2011 FOR NO. ELEVATION N OUT d a > GROUNDWATER DEWATERINC REQUIREMENTS. T W M CO-, 853.19 E 838.87 NW 838.87 ^ Z CO-2 846.80 N 843.45 W 843.45 V/ W 3 _ CO-3 850.45 E 84318 5 843.98 ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT DATE x 06/28/2012 GOPHER STATE CALL ONE S MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 PROJECT NO. E BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS 160633001 E TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 SHEET NUMBER N 6063 o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 m A lg ... � _ _ II I J ------ IIJJJ COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD �© o . I I NORTH a.L_ If 7 ,- -------- -- -- - I ---,--_.. r — n ni------- T-----��-- --- -'--" -- - -- ----- ------._ I o� D SD 120 1 \ - ----------- r - ----- ----- - - - �a SCALE FEET SITE KEY q i J N.T.S. — A\' I 1 Y t t i, s ( PSG gi.s ° Li -�_.- -- ----__— PHOTOMETRIC NOTES: A. CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE BASES WILL BE USED FOR LIGHT POLE BASE FOUNDATIONS. ❑ A B. SEE SITE DETAILS FOR LIGHT POLE AND BASE DETAIL. R r C. REFER TO ARCH.PUNS FOR SITE LIGHTING (/ ELECTRICAL PLAN. o 1 \ \ / 1•' D. LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE METAL HALIDE. E O \ E. LIGHT POLES SHALL BE 39 FEET TALL.ROUND, ~ o TAPERED,BLACK STEEL POLES WITH A FIXTURE \` 11 �\ MOUNTING HEIGHT OF 42 FEET.(REF.CUT SHEET) LJ F N ° Q o >v v s zm� EXISTING PARKIN G LOT EXISTING PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING <S m g �s a � ° H !, 1 LIGHT POLE& LIGHT POLE& 5 FC(FOOT CANDLES) FIXTURES a 3 FC 1 \\• (n I ` 0 1 \\ 1 11 / 1 FC 5 FC U IT I �� � 3 F FC LccLI w e \�11 PROPOSED PARKING LOT PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN a 3 a \ \ /u LIGHTING LIGHTING O N $ \ tl SITE DATATABLE Phase z Overall Luminaire Schedule Z Z Z Z , r '^ //^� Symbol Qty Arrangement Description LLF Lumens/Lamp A— Lum. Lumens Arr.Watts co Lu V z Z \\ / / 14 D180 GM-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3•BASE 0.]50 120000 1]3304 2160 /1 U THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE / / ✓ V ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT.CONTRACTOR'S `i i( 1) \ 1 / 0 ROTATED 2 IN 90 GER-590-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3'BASE 0.]50 120000 944]8 2160 � J Z BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR `;it \ / . L Q p ApORE551NG THIS ISSUE.REFERENCE THE 12 SINGLE OFR-2-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3'BASE 0.]50 120000 45676 1080 U J J Y v CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY PLAN BY BRAUN O a INTERTEC DATED 05/27/2011 FOR GRGROUNDWATER NDWATER OEWATERING REQUIREMENTS Y Y \ 3 3 @ 90 DEGREES GFR-590-11)00-PSMV-F 39• POLE 3•BASE 0.750 120000 259956 3240 m L \ r/ Z °a � , 9 SINGLE GB-5-100-CMH-F 16• POLE 0.790 9000 5766 129 1 1 O co w L `4 f, // i p ♦ 0 SINGLE GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3'BASE 0.750 120000 86652 1080 W O 1 a0 $ \\t// 1// p EXISTING LIGHT N II..�1 ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT / To `RETAIN U m LLI r W GOPHER SEATECALL TONE .// I�-R EXISTING LIGHT J ♦A z MN z BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS - EXISTING LIGHT Q O TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 Z: U EXISTING LIGHT Z LL Z EL EXISTING EXISTING LIGHT = w o M U) JI w 3 DATE 06/28/2012 Y S PROJECT NO. E 160633001 E SHEET NUMBER N o 6083 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 18 19 20 GS a .r...-,.-�.._..............�.�...r.::__.....�.-.. ________ .......-_.- ..._1L.:-,..«,�.....sx... .x._�...�. ...r.�-.o�b<ni.'r.=-3.:1.......�.m-_�.�,.i.�,.�_��_✓ U o s NO 10 BASS LAKE I �'- �I�I� ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT = 10IL�TY I - GOPHER STATE CALL ONE /EASEMENT I NORTH ` 00 MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 E - / --- ..:-.. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 D SO 12D T --- h ` - ------ ------- ------ ---�� � - -- SCALE FEET ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: s I r a a \' I _ ALL WM GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED(EARTHWORK, :'; I FINAL UTILITIES.AND FINAL GRADING)BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN /-' - PROJECT DOCUMENTS.OUTLOT AREA TO BE KEPT FREE OF JOB TRAILERS AND STORAGE AFTER THE CONTRACT MILESTONE DATE FOR THE WTLOT O GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CLEAR ACCESS _ II �1 "•',•" FOR OUTLOT CONTRACTOR TO THE SPECIFIC TO PARCEL AT ALL TIMES ' O AFTER MILESTONE DATE.PURCHASER OF OUTLOT TO PROVIDE PERMIT SITE KEY DOCUMENTS AND SWPPP REQUIRED BY STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS '• i `..�. _ ` '�T} I`I N.T.S. FOR SPECIFIC OUTLOT. Z IS b b 8,420sf �Z D wil SEAR I I o _ v - o -.11A C) II E EMENT \% �\ c, ° a 4 L I\ \ LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES <�_ <N \ q ,sisF i 1. PLACE 4•DEPTH SHREDDED HARDW000 MULCH IN ALL PLANTING BEDS E \VT;V 2. MULCH ALL DECIWWS TREES WITH 3 FOOT DIA MULCH RING AND ALL w i s \ 11,200 EVERGREEN PLLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE SUCH•ASSHREDDED PREEOO HARDWOOD F� �. ��� . PLACEMENT N F \ 3. INSTALL STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER MERE TURF AREAS MEET •C ` V `\� �\1T`I\ SHRUB/PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS E �.'Y V - {. SEE LANDSCAPE DETAILS S FOR PLANING BED PREPARATION AND a °O N INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS > ALL PLANING BMS AND TURF AREAS WITHIN THE UNITS OF Fa<aa \ T \ 57' DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION TO BE IRRIGATED WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ¢(;�a0 o NO IRRIGATION WITHIN STORMWATER AND INFILTRATION AREAS OR AREAS AND UTILITY .'f\P\ :'�l\ SEEDED WITH NAIVE/WET SEED MIX s`i J o p \EASEMENTi' 6. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE ACQUIRED FROM SOURCES WITHIN G o_ E \ / 1, \ I \\ ' HARDINESS ZONES 3 OR 4 D_ -.1` �, 1 T. KEEP ALL SHRUBS AND PERENNIALS A MINIMUM OF 1B•OFF EDGE OF o = V \ PAVEMENT o 30 \ \ �\ 6. $DD ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH KENTU Y BLUEGRASS-FESCUE SOD Z m m °z o I II1I,`W" E R q M I \ ,``t a TOPSOIL < m ° UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PLACE SW OVER 4•a N° Y 3\ \ EASE •�". V\Q `R �} t \ \. 9. SOO AREAS AS NOTED WITH NO MOW TYPE ALL FESCUE SOD. s e E V \\\ H a \\ g a �` \\`` �,\ J LEGEND I% /:: EXISTHNGIREES(TOREMAIN Lu F EXIBING RAIN GAROEW Q Q J PHASE 2 PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE ,,\ I / SYMBOL CITY COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT 0 CS a ` //// VRAINAr' SWAMP WHITE OAK zr cAL. B&B Z W i - / ° / / UTII' a / / CdAMON IwCKBERRY 2S CAL. B&B z Z /�� CO \ 1ri AUTUMN 2.S CAL. Bd8 LLI Z K E ' \ ,I /� \\ OVERSTORY AUTUMN BLAZE MAPlE 2.5'CAL. Bd0 //3 U 2 \ r2`i \ 1 CECIDUWS SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 2.5•CAL. B&B VV// v W _ ♦� \ \ /� ll�"\ WAKING ASPEN $10 CONT. O z BIRCH(CLMP.) .1. CONT. U Q 10 e " / m IVORY SILK LILAC im CONT. J J J O m ' ' \ 1 /�/ J �''J-, ORNAMEEWSL CRABAPPLE i10 CONT. Y O \ /�/� // LLJ J BLACK HILLS SPRUCE T HT HT B a I3 W O Do W L /�/% ' 31 RED PINE W Bd8 N ' OL f j r �M� JUNIPER LL m (\) yO W yJ1 // EVERGREEN ti VIBURNUM IS CONT. w Z O F DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKL F3 E CONT. -J co V, Z Mr,^ DOGWOOO 1'3 CONT. (D SPIREA IS CONT. M a ,._..r:--_ DAYLILV CONT. '2 Z 1 )� KARL FOERSTER M1 CONT. v) Z W U SHRUBIPERENNIAL BLACK£YED SUSAN it CONT. _ 3 MASSING KOBOUD LIATRiS it CONT. DATE 06/28/2012 PROJECT NO. Y E 160633001 I E SHEET NUMBER N 6104 o