Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 08-13 CCP Regular Session • AGENDA CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION August 13, 2012 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary. 1. City Council Discussion of Agenda Items and Questions 2. Miscellaneous 3. Discussion of Work Session Agenda Items as Time Permits 4. Adjourn • • iCITY COUNCIL MEETING City of Brooklyn Center August 13, 2012 AGENDA 1. Informal Open Forum with City Council—6:45 p.m. provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with citizens. Questions from the Council will be for•clarification only. Open Forum will not be used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the comments made but,rather, for hearing the citizen for informational purposes only. 2. Invocation—7 p.m. 3. Call to Order Regular Business Meeting —The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary. 4. Roll Call 5. Pledge of Allegiance 6. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda —The following items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Council Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes 1. July 23 —Study Session 2. July 23 Regular Session 3. July 23 —Work Session 4. July 30—Joint Session with Financial Commission b. Licenses C. Applications and Permits for Temporary On-Sale Liquor Licenses Submitted by City of Lakes Nordic Ski Foundation for Events to be Held at Surly Brewing Company, 4811 Dusharme Drive, Brooklyn Center, on` September 22, and October 27, 2012 • d. Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessments for Delinquent Nuisance Abatement Costs, Delinquent Administrative Fines/Citations, and Delinquent Administrative Vacant Building Registrations CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- August 13,2012 • e. Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessments for Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts f. Resolution Declaring a Public Nuisance and Ordering the Removal of Diseased Trees g. Resolution Vacating Certain Easements within Outlot One, Donnays Brook Lyn Gardens 5th Addition; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Maranatha Addition; Part of Storm Sewer Easement 3211239, Hennepin County,Minnesota h. Resolution Approving Final Plat for EVANS NORDBY ADDITION 7. Presentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations None. 8. Public Hearings None. 9. Planning Commission Items a. Planning Commission Application No. 2012-010 Submitted by Loren Van Der . Slik (Gatlin Development Company). Request for PUD Amendment approval to amend the previously approved 2011 Planned Unit Development for Shingle Creek Crossing (dated 9-12-11). The Planning Commission recommended approval of this application at its August 2, 2012, meeting. 1. Resolution Regarding Recommended Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2012-010 Submitted by Loren Van Der Slik (Gatlin Development Company) for Approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt resolution. b. Planning Commission Application No. 2012-012 Submitted by Loren Van Der Slik (Gatlin Development Company). Request for Site and Building Plan Approval for proposed"Building G" as illustrated and planned for under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Master Development Plan, 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this application at its August 2, 2012,meeting. 1. Resolution Regarding the Recommended Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2012-012 Submitted by Loren Van Der Slik (Gatlin Development Company) Approving New Site and Building Plan for Proposed Building G (Located on Lot 11, Block 1, Shingle Creek • Crossing Addition— 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing) Requested Council Action: -Motion to adopt resolution. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- August 13,2012 • 10. Council Consideration Items a. Resolution Receiving Proposed Charter Amendment and Calling a Special Election Thereon Requested Council Action: -Motion to adopt resolution. 11. Council Report 12. Adjournment • EDA MEETING City of Brooklyn Center August 13,2012 AGENDA 1. Call to Order —The EDA requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full City Council packet, including EDA(Economic Development Authority), is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary. 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda —The following items are considered to be routine by the Economic Development Authority (EDA) and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Commission Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes 1. July 9, 2012—Regular Session • 4. Commission Consideration Items a. Resolution Approving Consent to Assignment of TIF Note (Twin Lakes Business Park) Requested Commission Action: —Motion to adopt resolution. 5. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION August 13, 2012 Immediately Following Regular City Council and EDA Meetings Which Start at 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers City Hall A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary. ACTIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS 1.Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study Update 2.Earle Brown and Opportunity Area Street Light Replacement Update 3.Environmental Response Funds Councilmember Lasman PENDING LIST FOR FUTURE WORK SESSIONS Later/Ongoing 1.National League of Cities Service Line Program 2.Sister City Update 3.Success Target Update • City Council Agenda Item No. 6a • r • MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION JULY 23,2012 CITY HALL—COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Carol Kleven, Kay Lasman, Lin Myszkowski, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, Police Chief Kevin Benner, Fire Chief Lee Gatlin, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Carla Wirth,TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS • in articular whether 4201 Councilmember Lasman requested discussion on Item 6b, Licenses, p Lakeside Avenue is-a single unit. Police Chief Kevin Benner indicated it is a condominium and each is individually numbered. Councilmember Lasman noted the Earle Brown Farm Apartments had more calls than the unit threshold. Police Chief Benner clarified that threshold was based on 6.5 calls for service per unit. Councilmember Lasman requested discussion on Item 7a, Wellness by Design Awards, in particular why the City Council had not been invited to attend that award ceremony at the Earle Brown Heritage Center. City Manager Curt Boganey stated he is unsure why only City staff was invited. Councilmember Lasman requested discussion on Item 10a, Consideration of Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for Twin Lakes Manor, 3305-3433.53`a Avenue North, noting there was an extraordinary number of violations at 1,034. She expressed concern that this owner was not taking requirements seriously and suggested this property be red flagged at the time of renewal so if found to be problematic,the City Council can consider suspension or revocation. Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning noted this apartment complex has 310 units. Councilmember Ryan stated he shared this concern and during consideration of that item, would • like staff to speak to that issue and why suspension or revocation should not be considered tonight. 07/23/12 -1- DRAFT Ms. Schleunin reviewed r of police issues • g w d the staff report and advised that due to the number p , many meetings were held with the property owner, staff, the Police Department, and legal counsel was actively involved including drafting the mitigation plan and addendum to address those issues. Councilmember Kleven noted the taxes and utilities are fully paid and the mitigation plan finalized including a window replacement plan, monitoring of the property, and on-site security. She noted these are all steps forward and she thinks the owner can turn the property around in six months' time. Mayor Willson agreed the owner is making the attempt to improve the property and when this rental license is considered for renewal, the City Council can then determine if the mitigation plan was met. He noted this is an aging and outdated apartment complex so the City may need to be more diligent. Mr. Boganey noted this is the first time this property has been before the City Council since adoption of the new rental process and the first opportunity the City Council has had to use the tools built into this stepped process of licensing. Mayor Willson agreed that the goal of the rental licensing program is to bring those tools on line and while there is a learning curve with this new process, the City Council is serious about following those guidelines. • Councilmember Myszkowski stated she agrees with the comments made expressing concern with the number of Code violations and police calls. She stated the addendum to the mitigation P lan and window replacement lacement plan are good steps forward but she is saddened to think that so many had to live in such subpar conditions, which should not happen in Brooklyn Center. MISCELLANEOUS COMPLIANCE NOTICE FOR A DEAD TREE Councilmember Kleven reviewed the e-mail from a resident on 53`d Avenue N. expressing concerns with her interaction with the City over a compliance notice for a dead tree. She stated she finds the compliance letter to be "cold" and suggested improving this communication by including a cover letter with some of the information contained in Ms. Schleuning's e-mail such as instructions and available choices. The Council discussed the Notice of Compliance, noting it was well worded, included appropriate notice and explanation of the City's Dead Tree Program, and outlined options available to the resident. Mayor Willson noted the City Council dealt with and resolved this issue earlier this year. Mr. Boganey clarified the process used and indicated the City monitors responses received from 07/23/12 -2- DRAFT • citizens regarding our communications and when seeing the same type of complaint, adjustments are made. Concern With Metro Transit Hub Activity Councilmember Myszkowski stated she received a comment of concern from Gateway Commons that there is anxiety over the opening of Walmart and potential for increased police calls at the Metro Transit hub. One resident has even cited leaving Gateway Commons. Mayor Willson agreed with the need for careful monitoring. DISCUSSION OF WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEMS AS TIME PERMITS USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN—COUNCILMEMBER RYAN Councilmember Ryan introduced the item, reviewed the City Council's past consideration of the proposed Charter amendment to impose additional regulations on the process of future EDA actions, and that the major point of contention was the time limit imposed on that process. He indicated had attended the last two Charter Commission meetings in an effort to persuade the Commissioners that it was not in the best interest of Brooklyn Center to place this question on the upcoming ballot. Councilmember Ryan explained in that effort,he had offered to propose to the City Council that it draft an ordinance to impose some restrictions on the City's use of • eminent domain. He asked the City Council if it wanted to be passive about the Charter Commission placing this question on the ballot or was willing to consider such an ordinance. Mayor Willson stated he does not support taking action on such an ordinance,noting the Charter Commission has every right to take actions they determine as long as it is part of the Charter. In addition, State Statutes are clear in how eminent domain works and he did not think it was worth the City Council's time to consider such an ordinance to"fix something that is not broken." City Attorney Charlie LeFevere addressed a question of Councilmember Ryan related to the cost and time needed to research the City's past eminent domain proceedings that may have involved other law firms or redevelopment counsel. ADJOURN STUDY SESSION TO INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to close the Study Session at 6:45 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. RECONVENE STUDY SESSION Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to reconvene the Study Session at 6:47 p.m. 07/23/12 -3- DRAFT Motion passed unanimously. • USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN—COUNCILMEMBER RYAN-CONTINUED The discussion continued on use of eminent domain. Councilmember Ryan concurred that the Charter Commission has prerogative to write a Charter amendment but when City Attorney LeFevere presented information on how problematic the proposed amendment would be, some Charter Commissioners summarily disregarded that information. He believed this was the type of issue that argues for representative government and one Charter Commissioner had said he does not know how the public can be educated on this issue prior to the question being placed on the ballot. Mayor Willson noted the Charter Commission has not brought forward an eminent domain question for placement on the ballot. Councilmember Ryan stated that may be because he had made the suggestion about bringing the matter before the City Council. Mayor Willson noted the Charter Commission needs to decide in the next two to three weeks if it wants the question on the fall ballot. Councilmember Myszkowski indicated the Charter Commission is an entity unto itself, charged with the Charter, and can do as they see fit. In addition, even if the City Council considered such' an ordinance,the Charter Commission may still desire to create something more restrictive. Mr. Boganey reported on a quick search of the immediate public record conducted by the City Clerk relating to the number of times where the City Council or EDA had adopted a resolution authorizing the use of eminent domain,but there is no easy way to determine the outcome. Councilmember Kleven stated that while she appreciates the work of Councilmember Ryan, she- . believes the regulations contained in State Statutes are enough. She noted the Charter Commission has a majority to go forward with an amendment. Councilmembers Lasman, Kleven, and Myszkowski stated a preference to wait to see what the Charter Commission determines to do. Mayor Willson concurred and noted there is no eminent domain project in the City's near future and starting an ordinance process will not sway those on the Charter Commission who strongly su pp ort moving forward with a ballot question. He noted the Council had unanimously supported not considering an ordinance at a previous meeting. It was the majority consensus of the City Council to take no action in this regard. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to close the Study Session at 6:59 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 07/23/12 -4- DRAFT • MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION JULY 23, 2012 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:45 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Carol Kleven, Kay Lasman, Lin Myszkowski, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, Police Chief Kevin Benner, Fire Chief Lee Gatlin, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Carla Wirth,Timesaver Off Site Secretarial,Inc. • Willson opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum. Mayor Tim p g pure p No one wished to address the City Council. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 6:47 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 2. INVOCATION None. 3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 7:04 p.m. 4. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Carol Kleven, Kay Lasman, Lin Myszkowski, and • Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Planning and Zoning Specialist Tim Benetti, Assistant City 07/23/12 -1- DRAFT Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, Police Chief Kevin • Benner, Fire Chief Lee Gatlin, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Carla Wirth, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, and the following consent items were approved: 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. July 2, 2012—Joint Work Session w/Financial Commission 2. July 9, 2012—Study/Work Session 3. July 9 2012—Regular Session 6b. LICENSES LIQUOR—OFF-SALE 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR Walmart#5625 1200 Shingle Creek Crossing MECHANICAL • Legacy Mechanical Services 9714 Woodcrest Court,Monticello MS Universal Services 6785 Underwood Lane, Plymouth Upland Heating and Cooling 308 SW 15th Street,Forest Lake RENTAL INITIAL (TYPE II—two year license) 5815 Drew Avenue N. Andrew and Jessica Kuhn 4201 Lakeside Avenue#212 First House LLC RENEWAL (TYPE III-one-year license) 6807 Humboldt Avenue N. C301 Raymond Charest RENEWAL (TYPE II—two-year license) Earle Brown Farm Apartments 1701 69th Avenue N. Sheldon Tysk 5412 Fremont Avenue N. Gary Anakkala RENEWAL (TYPE I—three-year license) Unity Place—7256 Unity Avenue N. CHDC Ltd. Partnership 1316 68th Lane N. Valerie Blount McKissick 7041 Willow Lane N. Sandra Hansen • 07/23/12 -2- DRAFT aSIGNHANGER Scenic Sign Corporation 828 South 5th Street, Sauk Rapids TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCTS Family Dollar,Inc. Store#9267 6800 Humboldt Avenue N Motion passed unanimously. 7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS 7a. WELLNESS BY DESIGN AWARD City Manager Curt Boganey introduced the item,noting Wellness by Design Worksite Awards are presented in four award levels to Hennepin County worksites. He stated staff is proud to have received this recognition and the banner received has been placed in City Hall. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to receive the Wellness by Design Award. Motion passed unanimously. 7b. - LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES CITY OF EXCELLENCE AWARD • Mr. Boganey introduced the item and advised that the League of Minnesota Cities presented the g Y g City of Excellence Award to Brooklyn Center, the only city over 20,000 in population to receive this recognition as well as a monetary award of$1,000. He explained this award recognizes the City's performance based rental inspection program, now a model used by other municipalities. Mayor Willson presented the award to Police Chief Kevin Benner and Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning. He stated,the City Council put a lot of hours into providing policy; however, City Manager Boganey and his office successfully implemented the rental licensing program, as evidenced by receipt of this award and other recognitions as well. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to receive the League of Minnesota Cities City of Excellence Award. Motion passed unanimously. 7c. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-100 EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR A DONATION OF $1,000 FROM THE BROOKLYN CENTER ROTARY CLUB TO BE USED TOWARDS THE PURCHASE OF A THERMAL IMAGING CAMERA Mr. Boganey introduced the item and stated the purpose of the resolution to accept a charitable • contribution of$1,000 from the Brooklyn Center Rotary Club that will go towards the purchase of a Thermal Imaging Camera for the Brooklyn Center Fire Department. 07/23/12 -3- DRAFT • Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2012-100 Expressing Appreciation for a Donation of $1,000 from the Brooklyn Center Rotary Club to be Used Towards the Purchase of a Thermal Imaging Camera. Fire Chief Lee Gatlin explained how this equipment is used to enter smoke filled environments to look for victims and reduce structural damage when fighting a fire. He stated the Fire Department's appreciation to the Rotary Club. Mayor Willson read the resolution in full. Motion passed unanimously. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8a. ORDINANCE NO. 2012-04 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2010-12 REGARDING COUNCIL SALARIES FOR 2013.2014 City Manager Curt Boganey introduced the item, discussed the history, and stated the purpose of the proposed ordinance to increase salaries for the Mayor and City Council by 3.0%for 2013 and 3.0%for 2014, as recommended by the Financial Commission. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lasman seconded to open the Public Hearing. • Motion passed unanimously. No one wished to address the City Council. Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 2012-04 Amending Ordinance No. 2010-12 Regarding Council Salaries for 2013-2014. Motion passed unanimously. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 9a. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-009 SUBMITTED BY RER ACQUISITIONS, LLC, FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FRANCE AVENUE BUSINESS PARK ADDITION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4001 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE NORTH Planning and Zoning Specialist Tim Benetti provided an overview of Planning Commission Application No. 2012-009 and advised the Planning Commission recommended approval of the 07/23/12 -4- DRAFT applications at its June 28, 2012, meeting. The request is to plat (combine) two separate parcels that include the 7.4 acre former Northwest Athletic Club/Lifetime Fitness site and the adjacent 1.3 acre State of Minnesota/Mn/DOT excess right-of-way parcel into one larger redevelopment parcel. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-101 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012- 009—SUBMITTED BY RER ACQUISITIONS, LLC,FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FRANCE AVENUE BUSINESS PARK ADDITION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4001 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE NORTH Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to approve Planning Commission Application No. 2012-101 Regarding the Recommended Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2012-009, Submitted by RER Acquisitions, LLC, for Preliminary Plat of France Avenue Business Park Addition for the Property Located at 4001 Lakebreeze Avenue North. Motion passed unanimously. 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 10a. CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE • FOR TWIN LAKES MANOR,3305-3433 53'AVENUE NORTH Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning advised that Twin Lakes Manor, 3305-3433 53`d Avenue North (310 units) was inspected and 1,034 (3.34/unit)property code violations were cited and ultimately corrected. There have been 131 (.42/unit) validated police incidents/nuisance calls within the last 12 months. This properly qualifies for a Type IV six-month provisional rental license based on the number of property code violations found during the initial rental license inspection. The property owner is also required to submit a mitigation plan and report monthly on the progress of that plan. Ms. Schleuning reviewed items addressed within the mitigation plan addendum and actions taken in regard to this rental license application. She indicated Staff has reviewed that mitigation plan and held discussion with the property owner and recommends approval based on meeting standards in the mitigation plan, its addendum, and all applicable ordinances. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to open the hearing. Motion passed unanimously. No one wished to address the City Council Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the hearing. • Motion passed unanimously. 07/23/12 -5- DRAFT Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to approve the issuance of a • Type IV six-month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for Twin Lakes Manor, 3305- 3433 53rd Avenue North, with the requirement that the mitigation plan must be strictly adhered to before a renewal rental license would be considered. Motion passed unanimously. 10b. PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT REGARDING WARD SYSTEM Mr. Boganey introduced the item and described the proposed Charter amendments to Sections 2.02, Boards and Commissions; 2.03a, Elective Officers; 2.03b. Wards; and, 2.03c Redistrict Procedures. The Charter Commission has requested; in accordance with State Law, to place this question on the November 2012 ballot. Under State law, the City Council is required to adopt a resolution, set a date for the election, and determine the ballot question. That resolution will be presented to the City Council at its August 13, 2012,meeting. Mayor Willson referenced the Charter Commission meeting minutes and e-mail from a Charter Commissioner and asked whether the City Council had received proper notice from the Charter Commission. City Attorney Charlie LeFevere advised that State Law does not specify a procedure that an officer has to submit a certain document in a certain way. The City Manager has communicated with the Charter Commission to assure the City has the proper form of proposed Charter amendment approved by the Charter Commission and the meeting minutes show the vote that was taken. Mr. LeFevere advised the Charter Commission has substantially • complied with the statutory requirements. Mr. LeFevere noted August 24, 2012, is the last date for the City Council to act to get notice to the Hennepin County Auditor for placement on the November 6, 2012, ballot. The Council is required by law to call the election and determine the form of ballot question on which the voters will act. Mr. LeFevere noted a Charter Commissioner had submitted a suggested form of question he deemed appropriate but that is the decision of the City Council. The purpose of the question is not to educate or characterize the Charter amendment in any particular way. Mr. LeFevere advised the text of the amendment has to be published twice by the City and there may be other additional efforts to educate the public on the text. The intent is to identify the question clearly and differentiate it from other ballot questions at the same election. Mr. LeFevere offered one form of question: "Shall the proposed new Charter amendment be adopted?" Or, to make it clear that this amendment relates to the Brooklyn Center Charter amendment: "Shall the Brooklyn Center Charter amendment requiring election of all City Council Members by ward be adopted?" The Council discussed the proposed Charter amendments and noted there are actually two questions: election of City Council Members by ward; and, method that board and commission membership is determined. Mr. LeFevere noted to assure the question is not misleading, it may be better to state: "Should the Brooklyn Center Charter amendment be adopted?" 07/23/12 -6- DRAFT • The Council discussed how the question should be worded and agreement was reached that the proposed Charter amendments all relate to a ward system change. It was noted that a Charter Commissioner was not in attendance to address the issue. Mayor Willson offered wording indicating: "Shall the Brooklyn Center Charter amendment establishing a ward system be adopted?" Councilmember Lasman supported using the word "change" to alert voters that the amendment under consideration it is a change to the current Charter. She suggested wording such as: "Shall the Brooklyn Center Charter be changed to require all Council Members to be elected by a ward systemT' Mayor Willson and each Councilmember stated their support for the current system that allowed those seeking office to campaign through the entire City, for the City's elected officials to represent all Brooklyn Center residents, and be concerned with issues impacting all of its citizens. It was noted a ward system may create an easier and less expensive process to campaign in only one-quarter of the City; however, it is of benefit to the City's residents to be represented by five members on the City Council as opposed to one ward member and an at large Mayor. In addition a ward system is more appropriate fo r larger cities/school districts g Y � Y g where it is impossible to meet all of the residents and be aware of all issues of concern. The Council acknowledged that the City's Charter is to the City what the Constitution is to the United States of America so great care was appropriate when considering an amendment. It was • pointed out that the option of a ward system had been discussed by the Charter Commission had been made each time that the current system three times since 1973 however, the decision Y was best for the residents of Brooklyn Center. The City Council indicated it has had virtually no input on the Charter Commission's consideration and while there has been no outcry from the community addressing this issue, the Charter Commission has the prerogative to place this question on the ballot and the public will have the final say in how it will be resolved. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to direct staff to prepare a resolution accepting the Charter Commission recommendation and calling a special election thereon. Motion passed unanimously. 11. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember Ryan stated his report will be different as he has been on vacation. He commented that all are socked with the Aurora, Colorado, incident and hoped that going forward our local and national leaders can focus on constructive approaches to making our communities safer. He encouraged all to devote some time to moments of prayer and silent reflection. Councilmember Myszkowski reported on her attendance at the following: • July 10, 2012, Willow Lane Park Neighborhood Meeting . July 11, 2012, Delivered New Neighbor Welcome Bags • July 13, 2012, Relay for Life at Brooklyn Center High School 07/23/12 -7- DRAFT • July 17, 2012,Earle Brown Days Board of Directors • • July 17, 2012,Housing Commission Discussion • July 17, 2012,Visit to the Family Services Center Construction Center Councilmember Myszkowski reminded all to vote in the primary election, which occurs in three weeks, and clarified there has been no change in the voter identification process for this year. Councilmember Kleven reported on her attendance at the following: • July 10,2012, Willow Lane Neighborhood Meeting • July 11,2012;ARM Meeting • July 13,2012,Relay for Life • July 14,2012,Kathy's Garden Block Party • July 18,2012, Clean Marlin Park • July 21,2012, St. Alphonsus Fun Fair Councilmember Kleven announced that Taco Bell was demolished and will be rebuilt on the same site. She invited those interested to help deliver new neighbor welcome bags this Wednesday. Councilmember Kleven announced the July 28, 2012,soccer tournament and other activities at the Brooklyn Center High School to celebrate the Liberian Independence Day; August 4, 2012, Stop the Violence Community Celebration; and, August 6, 2012,National Night Out Kick Off Party at Centennial Park. Councilmember Lasman reported on her attendance at the following: . • July 10, 2012, Willow Lane Park Neighborhood Meeting • July 17, 2012,Brooklyn Center Community Band Concert • July 18, 2012,Northwest Hennepin County Services Luncheon Meeting • July 18,2012, Crime Prevention Program Meeting Councilmember Lasman, Crime Prevention Liaison, announced the August 6, 2012, National Night Kick Off Party in Centennial Park where all are invited and many events will be offered. Mayor Willson noted he will be attending an out of town training so Mayor Pro Tem Lasman will be presenting awards for Brooklyn Center that evening. Mayor Willson reported on his attendance at the following: • July 10, 2012, Willow Lane Park Neighborhood Meeting • July 14, 2012, Kathy's Garden Block Party Mayor Willson announced that he and Councilmember Kleven will be attending the August 6, 2012, Local Board of Appeals training in St. Peter, Minnesota;the August 7, 2012, National Night Out event that will include 100 block parties; and, that he has been asked to speak on August 9, 2012, at the Shingle Creek Crossing Walmart soft opening and celebration of its 50t" corporate year. Mayor Willson recounted his opportunity to fly in a B17G WWII aircraft on July 15, 2012, and thanked WWII Veteran Jeffrey Delzer for offering him that invitation. 12. ADJOURNMENT • 07/23/12 -8- DRAFT Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 8:21 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. • • 07/23/12 -9- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WORK SESSION JULY 23, 2012 CITY HALL—COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council/Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to order by Mayor/President Tim Willson at 8:22 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor/President Tim Willson and Councilmembers/Commissioners Carol Kleven, Kay Lasman, Lin Myszkowski, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building & Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, Police Chief Kevin Benner, and Carla Wirth, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. NEIGHBORHOOD PARTIES—COUNCILMEMBER/COMMISSIONER LASMAN Police Chief Kevin Benner reported on his study of calls for large parties to determine if there • were trends. He indicated that during 2010-2011 there had been 23 calls for parties, about one per month with complaints of loud noise and parking. Chief Benner reported there had been four large party calls in 2011 where 50 or more were in attendance. He advised that the ordinance in place is effective because he did not find repeats to any address after cited. Chief Benner reviewed the efforts made to educate residents of the City's ordinances and that they also meet with neighbors and the offender to resolve issues to assure there are no repeat problems. If there are parking violations, which create hardships on other residents,the violators are cited and tickets issues. Chief Benner assured the City Council/EDA he had not seen a trend and in 2012 the number of calls was a little below average,though the summer was not yet over. Councilmember/Commissioner Lasman explained her concern was with smaller parties that occur at the same property every weekend and are causing parking hardships and some noise disturbance. Chief Benner stated he had studied large parties (more than 50 in attendance) but knows the property being referenced often has parties and during one incident, cars were cited three times in one evening. Councilmember/Commissioner Lasman noted that chalking tires is ineffective because cars have to be moved only a short distance. She stated this type of situation is a quality of life issue and asked what can be done. Chief Benner advised of a State statute under which nuisance properties can be cited that has a"three strikes" rule resulting in the ability to board the housing for one year and prohibit occupancy. • 07/23/12 -1- DRAFT Councilmember/Commissioner Lasman pointed out that at some point, residents think the City is ineffective and give up. She stated she does not like that image for Brooklyn Center. Chief Benner stated they encourage residents to call with concerns so they can also be informed if citations were issued that resulted in fines. Chief Benner stated another option is to hold a neighborhood or mediation meeting. Councilmember/Commissioner Lasman stated the Neighborhood Watch Captain did schedule such a meeting but the resident at that property did not attend. Mayor/President Willson asked if the City uses a "boot" for parking violators. Chief Benner stated the City does not have that type of equipment but does have the option to tow violators, which results in a fine and inconvenience for the violator. Councilmember/Commissioner Kleven asked about the cost of a parking citation. Chief Benner reviewed the rates for citations, depending on the type and number issued. Mayor/President Willson noted Walmart is opening on August 9, 2012, and concerns have been expressed about incidents at the Metro Transit Hub. Chief Benner stated he had met with the five Walmart managers and learned they have a Tier 1 security system. In addition, Metro Transit, in partnership with City Manager Boganey,has posted two officers at that location. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan asked if the City has the ability to document nuisances and • use the State Statute process mentioned earlier that is handled by Hennepin County. Chief Benner answered in the affirmative. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated he will refer information to City Manager Boganey that he received about a property with on-going nuisance issues. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember/Commissioner Lasman moved and Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan seconded adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 8:47 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 07/23/12 -2- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL • OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,, JOINT WORK SESSION WITH FINANCIAL COMMISSION JULY 30, 2012 CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Joint Work Session with the Financial Commission and the session was called to order by Mayor Tim Willson of 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Carol Kleven, Kay Lasman, Lin Myszkowski, and Dan Ryan. Also present: City Manager Curt Boganey, Finance Director Dan Jordet, and Customer Service Representative Charlene Finberg. Others present were Financial Commissioners Steve Landis, Rex Newman, Anissa Hollingshead and Dean Van Der Werf. Financial Commissioners Teneshia Plunkett, Dan Schueller, and Koff,Agbossou were absent. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS • Finance Director Dan Jordet stated that debt service funding falls into four categories. The first category is Improvement Bonds, which are paid with the proceeds of assessments against property taxes. These are generally used to finance street reconstruction projects. The second, General Obligation Bonds, which are paid with proceeds received from direct property taxes. These are used to finance the construction of the Police Department building and renovation of the two Fire Stations. The third, Tax Increment Bonds, which are paid with receipts from tax increments collected in Tax Increment District #3. The proceeds of these bonds were used for TIF eligible economic redevelopment projects. The last category is Utility Revenue Bonds, which are funded by the net revenues of the Water and Sanitary Sewer utilities. The proceeds were used to replace all water meters in the City with remote,radio-read meters. Compared to other surrounding communities, total debt per capita, Brooklyn Center ranks in the middle. Total debt is moderate compared to other neighboring communities. US Bank handles all bonds and reviews are done periodically by Springsted to evaluate interest earned and paid. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Four of the Special Revenue funds were reviewed this evening: • HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(HRA)LEVY 07/30/2012 -1- This concerns the "tax ro ert p p y levy for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). It is fixed at a maximum levy of 0.01865%of the Taxable Market Value of the City. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(EDA) This is funded primarily by the transfer of the HRA tax levy to the EDA fund. Since the levy has been reduced and operation costs have grown with property maintenance costs,net operations have resulted in losses. These losses will increase with the Market Value Homestead Exclusion to property values. Reduction of EDA costs are possible with the development of City purchased land and reorganization of staffing and reassignment of costs to other Departments. POLICE GRANTS These are State and Federal grant funds provided for specific purposes. The City will receive four grants: Bulletproof Vests, Cadet Program,Auto Theft Grant, and COPS Grant. These funds are available for use in the 2013 fiscal year, but it is not yet known if there will be any grant funding available for the 2014 fiscal year. RECREATION GRANTS • Through a combination of donations, registration fees and reimbursements,these funds are used for special activities of the CARS Department. PROPERTY TAX MODELS CHANGES IN PROPERTY VALUES Mr. Jordet reviewed the changes in property values. Overall values were down 7.0% and single family values were down 11.8%. Additional analysis of this data will be done and charted for the August 20, 2012, Work Session. MISCELLANEOUS The next Joint Work Session with the Financial Commission is scheduled for Monday, August 20, 2012. City Manager Boganey and Finance Director Jordet then responded to questions and statements from Council Members and Commissioners. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to adjourn the Work ,. Session at 7:34 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 07/30/2012 -2- • City Council Agenda Item No. 6b • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM • DATE: August 7, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk SUBJECT: Licenses for City Council Approval Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the following licenses at its August 13,2012. Background: The following businesses/persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each business/person has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Applicants for rental dwelling licenses are mi compliance with Chapter 12 of the City Code of Ordinances, unless comments are noted below the property address on the attached rental report. MECHANICAL AirCorps, LLC 2230 Terminal Road,Roseville Airtech Thermex LLC 4918 West 35th St, St. Louis Park • Damyan's Heating& Cooling 7900 Excelsior Blvd, Suite 300,Hopkins Dennis Greger 814 17th Ave N, South St. Paul Heating& Cooling Solutions,Inc. 1802 226th Ln NE, East Bethel Legend Mechanical 8555 W 123rd Street, Savage Minnesota Heating&Air 10701 93rd Ave N, Maple Grove Perfection Heating&Air 1770 Gervais, Ave,Maplewood TNC Industries,Inc. 7100 Medicine Lake Road,New Hope Upland Heating&Cooling, Inc. 308-SW 15th St, Forest Lake RENTAL See attached report. SIGNHANGER Apparently Graphic, Ltd 1055 Cliff Road E,Burnsville Signart Co. Inc. 2170 Dodd Road, Mendota Heights • Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people anti preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Rental License Category Criteria Policy—Adopted by City Council 03-08-10 • Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category Number of Units Property Code Violations per (Based on Property Inspected Unit Code Only) Type I—3 Year 1-2 units 0-1 „�_ At4 MIi P ;� 3 lullt$, 0 0,.75 g#- _ _ Type II—2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 1 but not more than 4 3+units. _ Greater than 0,75 butnrmore than 1.5 Type III- 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 4 but not more than 8 3+units Greater than 1 5. but-notnox #han 3 Type IV—6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 8 3f units Greater tliari 3 - -. .,. ` License Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Category Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category 1-2 0-1 Impact 3-4 unitsy 0-0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 • Decrease 1 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 Category 3�4 amts Greater th'ari'U.25 but notAn&6#han 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 1-2 Greater than 3 Categories ,= units- = Greater=than 1r ""' ' "" 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. • Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Property Final Previous Dwelling Renewal Code License o lice License License Property Address Type or Initial Owner Violations Type CFS* Type** Type*** 2018 55th Ave N Single Family Initial Chen Xuan Zhou 0 II II N/A 4908 Abbott Ave N Single Family Initial lieff Hudson 4 II II N/A 7211 Camden Ave N Single Family Initial Arthur Bannerman 0 II II N/A 5943 Colfax Ave N Single Family Initial Juliana Koe 1 II II N/A 5444 Humboldt Ave N Single Family Initial Melanie Boes 0 II II N/A 4207 Lakeside Ave#140 Single Family Initial Joseph Drechsler 0 II II N/A 3024 Nash Rd Single Family Initial James Morgan 4 II II N/A 1 bldg 9 7018 Brooklyn Blvd 8 units Renewal Nelia Schaff 1.13/unit II 0 II 111 5 5245-47 Drew Ave N Two Family(2) Renewal Mai Xiong 2.5/unit II 0 II IV 314149th Ave N Single Family Renewal Manoj Moorjani 6 III 0 III III 490161st Ave N Single Family Renewal Antonio Smith 1 I 1 I N/T 5352 72nd Cir Single Family Renewal Denise Michaelides 1 1 1 1 II 6607 Beard Ave N Single Family Renewal Ernie Zheng 8 Ili 0 III II 3800 Burquest La Single Family Renewal Michael Perron 8 III 0 III II 6718 Colfax Ave N Single Family Renewal Ken Fountain 2 II 0 II III 5828 Fremont Ave N Single Family Renewal Hamid Safdari 1 I 0 1 IV 5739 James Ave N Single Family Renewal Doug Wahl 3 II 2 111 III 5813 June Ave N ISingle Family Renewal I Lena Lim L 5 III 1 0 III II *CFS=Calls For Service for Renewal Licenses Only(initial Licenses are not applicable to calls for service and will be listed N/A.) ** Final License Type .***Initial licenses will not show a previous license type; N/T indicates No Type since it was under the previous 2-year rental license program All properties are current on utilities and property taxes Type I=3 year Type 11=2 year Type Ill=1 year City Council Agenda Item No. 6c 1 • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM • DATE: July 20, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk SUBJECT: Applications and Permits for Temporary On-Sale Liquor Licenses Submitted by City of Lakes Nordic Ski Foundation for Events to be Held at Surly Brewing Company, 4811 Dusharme Drive, Brooklyn Center, on September 22, and October 27,2012 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the applications and permits for temporary on-sale liquor licenses submitted by City of Lakes Nordic Ski Foundation for events to be held at Surly Brewing Company,4811 Dusharme Drive, on September 22, and October 27, 2012. Background: City of Lakes Nordic Ski Foundation has submitted applications and permits for temporary on sale liquor licenses for events to be held at Surly Brewing Company, 4811 Dusharme Drive, on September 22, and October 27, 2012. The applicant has satisfied the City's requirements, submitted the $25 fee for each day of the license, along with a certificate of coverage for liquor liability insurance, and has existed as a non-profit organization for at least three years. The applicant will meet with the Police Department to review and discuss parking, safety, and security issues. After Council review, the application and permit will be forwarded to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division for approval. City Ordinance Section 11-107(6) Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. This license may be issued only upon receiving the approval from the Commissioner of Public Safety. 'The license may be issued only in connection with a social event within the city that is sponsored by a club or charitable, religious, or other nonprofit organization that has existed for at least three years or to a brewer who manufactures fewer than 3,500 barrels of malt liquor in a year. The license may authorize the sale of intoxicating liquor to be consumed on the Premises for not more than three consecutive days, and the City shall issue no more than twelve days' worth of temporary licenses to any one organization or for any one location within a 12-month period. The temporary license may authorize the sale of intoxicating liquor to be consumed on Premises other than Premises the licensee owns or permanently occupies. The temporary license may provide that the licensee may contract for intoxicating liquor catering services with the holder of an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License issued by any municipality. • Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive conutuunity that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust O;, xTx o • BROOKLYN CENTER i Qttii GT4tt MN POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Curt Boganey,City Manager FROM: Kevin Benner, Chief of Police DATE: July 27,2012 SUBJECT: Police Review of Two Surly Event Applications I have reviewed the security plan provided by Surly Brewing for their events scheduled for September 22,2012 and October 27, 2012. 1 find no concerns with their plans as provided. I have approved their woad closure permit for both events as required by city • ordinance 25-902. • OF Minnesota Department of Public Safety , _z ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION " t 444 Cedar Street Suite 222,St.Paul MN 55101-5133 oFW (651)201-7507 Fax(651)297-5259 TTY(651)282-6555 I` � W W W.DPS.STATE.MN.US APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE TYPE OR PRINT INFORMATION NAME OF ORGANIZATION DATE ORGANIZED TAX EXEMPT NUMBER o; 2-v° x-41 11 S 2 25$ Z STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP COD A ivy, l5 'M NAME OF PERSON MAKING AP ICATIO BUSINESS HONE HOME PHONE .0 C % Qoc2� b • cbf- X88 • b-7 b DATES LIQUOR W111 BE SOLD TYPE OF ORGAaZATION CLIM ArftA13LE RELIGIOUS FIT ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME RESS ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME ADDRESS C16A_ � ;s 1C.-C4 V-Y-N ?,-I() [ � LAA\AeAj; kA ak_V'�_ )�4p�� ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME" ADDRESS --D , v a.'4,-J • Location license will be used. If an outdoor area,describe t( (_ 1 �l ' I- v s 4 Will the applicant contrket for intoxicating liquors ce9 Ifs o, the name and address o a liqu rp licensee roviding the service. .p y Will th applicant c liq r Iiabili insurance? If so,please provide the carrier's name and am unt of coverage. nsU n e ODD zoo a � azx� APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL&GAMBLING Q, ENFORCEMENT CITY/ LINTY r✓r�K �11 �°(1-C DATE APPROVED CITY FEE AMOUNT a5,CD LICENSE DATES DATE FEE PAID a O' AAk_Kwzk� SIGNATURE CITY CLERK OR COUrjT'OFFICIAL APPROVED DIRECTOR ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT NOTE:Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and/or county to the address above. If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the License for the event i PS-09079(12/09) . `. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYY) � S 7/20/2012 2 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: Patty Henning Gladwin Insurance Agency PHONE (952)935-5551 1 FAX (952)935-0435 738 11th Avenue So. ADDRE S:pattyh @gladwinagency.com PO BOX 159 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# Hopkins VIN 55343 INSURER A-Indiana Insurance 22659 INSURED INSURER B: Surly Brewing Company INSURER C: 4811 Dusharme Dr INSURER D: INSURER E: Brooklyn Center lei 55429 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER.CL11122801448 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN;THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ILTR TYPE OF INSURANCE AD DL S R POLICY NUMBER MM/DCD� MM/DDS LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY DAMAGE TO RENT D A CLAIMS-MADE �OCCUR BP8341860 PREMISES(Any occurrence $ 50,000 2/31/2011 12/31/2012 MED EXP(Any one person) $ 10,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000. GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 X POLICY PRO- LOC $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY C MBINED SINGLE LIMIT Ea accident $ ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OS SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY Per accident $ AUTOS AUTOS ( ) NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE HIRED AUTOS AUTOS Per accident $ X UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 A EXCESS LIAB HCLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ 1,000,000 DIED I X I RETENTION$ 10,000 CU8746201 2/31/2011 12/31/2012 $ A WORKERS COMPENSATION X WC STATU- OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE Y/N E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ 500,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ N/A (Mandatory in NH) 8344560 2/31/2011 2/31/2012 E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 500,000 if yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000 A Liquor Liability CBP8341860 12/31/201112/31/2012 Each Common Cause $1,000,000 Aggregate $2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES(Attach ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,if more space is required) Certificate Holder is an Additional Insured under General Liability and Liquor Liability if required by written contract or agreement. Certificate Holder is an Additional Insured under General Liability if required by written contract or agreement. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN City of Brooklyn Center ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, HN 55430 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE I I Anthony Nelson/USER 7 ACORD 25(2010/05) ©1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. INS025rgmnnsim Tha Ort(1Pn nama and Inn^ara raniefarafl marke^f A(,npn Minnesota Department of Public Safety 1 nALCOi1OL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 1 444 Cedar Street Suite 222,St.Paul MN 55101-5133 s �OF"�" (651)201-7507 Fax(651)297-5259 TTY(651)282-6555 "`w• �— WWW.DPS.STATE.MN-US APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE TYPE OR PRINT INFORMATION NAME OF ORGANIZATION DATE ORGANIZED TAX EXEMPT NUMBER STREET ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP COD ►v � N Ste- 'L-2' N PERSON MAKING APPLICA7N BUSINESS PHONE HOME PHONE E F DATES LIQUOR WILL B LD TYPE OF O A TION CLU CHkgjjABLE RELIGIOUS OTHEgNOMROFIT ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME ADDRESS t,,- F.o -yxr�- �Ln O RATION OFFICER'S NAME ADDRESS ��}. ;S lOLI%w 2 D r � v+vts S ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME ADDRESS J '' • L=ten s will be used. If an outdoor a,descrik � l 1.15�Gth- �2stJ P.i►2"� �i Will the applicant contract f or intoxicating liquor service? If so, 've th a and address the liquor lice `ee pr viding the service. r Will"the a licant carry liquor iability insurance? If so,please provide the carrier's name and ount of coverage. n is �n nc A1,002,0 rate a Q'� o� APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL&GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT CITY/ OUNTY v' DATE APPROVED CITY FEE AMOUNTS W LICENSE DATES DA FEE PAID —ODD (off SIGNATURE MY CLERK OR COUNTY OFFICIAL APPROVED DIRECTOR ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT • NOTE:Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and/or county to the address above. If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the License for the event PS-09079(12109) AC°R°® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 7120/2012 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject t the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT Patty Henning NAME: y g Gladwin Insurance Agency PHONE (952)935-5551 No):(952)935-0435 738 11th Avenue So. n DORESS:Pattyh @gladwinagency.com PO BOX 159 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# Hopkins NN 55343 INSURERA:Indiana Insurance 22659 INSURED INSURER B Surly Brewing Company INSURER C. 4811 Dusharme Dr INSURER D: INSURER E: Brooklyn Center MN 55429 INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBERCL11122801448 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TR TYPE OF INSURANCE DL UBR POLICY NUMBER MM/DDY/YYY1 POLICY/DD/YYYY LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 D MAGE TO RENTE X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PREMISES Ea occurrence $ 50,000 A CLAIMS-MADE Fx-1 OCCUR CBP8341860 2/31/2011 12/31/2012 MED EXP(Any one person) $ 10,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000. GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,0001 "Ci X POLICY PRO LOC $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT Ea accident ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ ALL OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $ F — I r 1 AUTOS Per accident $ X UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 A EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ 1,000,000 DED I X I RETENTION$ 10,00C U8746201 2/31/2011 2/31/2012 $ A WORKERS COMPENSATION X I WC STATU- OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY YIN DRY'IM ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ 500,000 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? NIA (Mandatory in NH) 08344560 2/31/2011 2/31/2012 E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 500,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000 A Liquor Liability BP8341860 2/31/2011 12/31/2012 Each Common Cause $1,000,000 Aggregate $2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS 1 VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,If more space is required) Certificate Holder is an Additional Insured under General Liability and Liquor Liability if required by written contract or agreement. Certificate Holder is an Additional Insured under General Liability if required by written contract or agreement. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED I City of Brooklyn Center ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Brooklyn Center, M 55430 Anthony Nelson/USER'-! ACORD 26(2010/06) ©1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. INS025 oninnrl ni Tha A(npn noma onel Innn am ranictamell morlre of af`ARin • City Council Agenda Item No. 6d • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: August 13, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Vickie Schleunin Assistant City Manager/Director of Building & Community g tY Standards SUBJECT: Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessments for Delinquent Nuisance Abatement Costs,Delinquent Administrative Fines/Citations, and Delinquent Administrative Vacant Building Registrations Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval/adoption of the resolution ordering a public hearing for Monday, September 10,2012 at 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard,to hear and pass upon any objections to the proposed special assessments for delinquent nuisance abatement accounts, delinquent administrative fines/citations, and delinquent administrative vacant building registrations,for the period July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012. Background: • The attached resolution calls fora public hearing to receive public testimony and comments regarding the proposed special assessments for delinquent nuisance abatement accounts, delinquent administrative fines/citations, and delinquent administrative vacant building registrations. The special assessment amounts are specified in the attached preliminary assessment rolls and are summarized as follows; - • Delinquent nuisance abatement account property owners have received notice of delinquent accounts in accordance with the established collection policy and have not made payments. • Delinquent administrative fines/citations have been issued to property owners in accordance to established policy and have not been paid. • Owners of properties that have been administratively registered as vacant have received notice of delinquent accounts in accordance with the established collection policy and have not made payments. At the scheduled public hearing,the City Council would consider adoption of the resolution to certify the special assessment levy rolls with Hennepin County. The 2012 interest rate for special assessments is six percent, as previously established by the Council. A copy of the special assessment pending levy roll is attached. • Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Budget Issues: The proposed levy roll for delinquent nuisance abatement costs totals $14,276.00. The proposed levy roll for delinquent administrative fines/citations costs totals$149,765.00. The proposed levy roll for delinquent administrative vacant building registrations is $5,400.00. Please note that the amount for administrative fines reflect a year's time period, rather than six months as on previous assessments. Council Goals: Strategic: 2. We will stabilize and improve residential neighborhoods. 3. We will ensure a safe and secure community. • • Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moves its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT NUISANCE ABATEMENT COSTS, DELINQUENT ADMINISTRATIVE FINES/CITATIONS, AND DELINQUENT ADMINISTRATIVE VACANT BUILDING REGISTRATIONS WHEREAS, the City performs and incurs costs for certain neighborhood maintenance services to protect public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, provides for a public hearing process,to recover the costs through special assessments; and WHEREAS, the City has performed neighborhood maintenance services, billed the property owners, and has not been reimbursed by certain property owners; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of September, 2012, in City Hall at 7 p.m. or • as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard,to pass upon the proposed assessments for the following charges: • Delinquent Nuisance Abatement Costs •Delinquent Administrative Fines/Citations • Delinquent Administrative Vacant Building Registration 2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the Director of Building and Community Standards shall forthwith prepare assessment rolls for the above charges, and shall keep them on file and open to inspection by any interested persons. 3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing. 4. The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in such assessment rolls not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that this resolution shall be effective immediately. August 13, 2012 Date Mayor RESOLUTION NO. • ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS • Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center,Minnesota,will meet in the Council Chambers of Brooklyn Center City Hall at 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, on Monday, September 10,2012, at 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard,to hear and pass upon any objections to the proposed assessments for the following: DELINQUENT NUISANCE ABATEMENT ACCOUNTS It is proposed to assess the costs of delinquent abatement costs to those tracts or parcels where, pursuant to City Ordinance Section 12-1101 - 12-1206, 12-1504 and in accordance with MS 429 and 463.251, abatement procedures were performed by order of City Inspectors and the cost for such abatement remains unpaid. DELINQUENT ADMINISTRATIVE FINES/CITATIONS It is proposed to assess the costs of delinquent administrative fines/citations to those tracts or parcels where,pursuant to City Ordinance Section 18-204,210 and in accordance with MS 429, delinquent administrative fines/citations were issued and the cost for such fines remains unpaid. DELINQUENT ADMINISTRATIVE VACANT BUILDING REGISTRATIONS It is proposed to assess the cost of administratively registering vacant buildings to those tracts or parcels where,pursuant to City Ordinance Section 12-1504 and in accordance with MS 429, administrative vacant building registration procedures were performed by order of the City Inspectors and the cost for such registration remains unpaid. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION FOR OBJECTIONS TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS • An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment for a p y tY pP specific parcel of land may be made unless the owner has filed a written objection to that objection to that assessment, signed by the affected property owner,with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented such a written objection to the presiding officer at the hearing. These assessments are now on file at City Hall and open to public inspection. Written or oral objections to the proposed assessments will be considered at this meeting,but the City Council may consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. AUXILIARY AIDS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours(4 days) in advance of the hearing. Please contact the City Clerk at 763-569-3300 to make arrangements. Sharon Knutson, City Clerk By order of the City Council • Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll (Admin Fines/Citations) 2011 &2012 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed August 02,2012 Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year• Lew No. Owner Name(s) Property Address Property ID Amount 18160 Matthew Joseph 5930 Camden Ave N 01-118-21-12-0022 125.00 Thanh Tran 18160 Darnell Williams 6006 Camden Ave N 01-118-21-12-0036 4,000.00 18160 The Bank of New York Mellon 5931 Colfax Ave N 01-118-21-21-0020 3,000.00 18160 Kristen Ryan 6043 Aldrich Ave N 01-118-21-21-0079 125.00 18160 Diana Whitaker 6028 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-21-0087 125.00 18160 Faheem Rizvi 6006 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-21-0090 125.00 Tammy Rizvi 18160 Glenn Kurke 6021 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-21-0097 750.00 18160 Naudeanne St Hilaire 5901 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-21-0120 125.00 Michael St Hilaire 18160 Lenell Johnson 6035 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-22-0032 875.00 18160 Chad Tesmer 6020 Emerson Ave N 01-118-21-22-0041 1,200.00 18160 Alvaro Alamos 6028 Emerson Ave N 01-118-21-22-0042 250.00 Estela Alamos 18160 Michael Deziel 6037 Emerson Ave N 01-118-21-22-0048 125.00 18160 Maurice McCarter 6014 Girard Ave N 01-118-21-22-0071 125.00 Danielle McCarter 18160 J&M Homes II LLC 5715 Emerson Ave N 01-118-21-23-0017 625.00 18160 Robert Durant 5725 Emerson Ave N 01-118-21-23-0032 375.00 • Magdaline Opare-Addo 18160 The Bank of New York Mellon 5737 Girard Ave N 01-118-21-23-0088 125.00 18160 Cel Monton LLC 5857 Colfax Ave N 01-118-21-24-0017 125.00 18160 Amos Guar 5800 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-24-0025 500.00 Marie Guar 18160 Gretchen Goodwin 5840 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-24-0030 125.00 18160 John Kelley 5759 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-24-0049 875.00 18160 Kimberly Pearson 5700 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-24-0056 250.00 18160 Kocon LLC 5712 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-24-0063 425.00 18160 Joshua Walstrom 5829 Aldrich Ave N 01-118-21-24-0088 500.00 18160 Rubin DeCelis 5621 Camden Ave N 01-118-21-31-0108 250.00 Liliana Canpagallo 18160 Andrea Larsen 5641 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-32-0002 125.00 18160 Syed Raza 5650 Humboldt Ave N 01-.118-21-32-0047 425.00 Holly Raza 18160 Allan Appelbee 5530 Emerson Ave N 01-118-21-32-0088 125.00 18160 Jerilyn Borth 5448 Girard Ave N 01-118-21-33-0052 125.00 18160 Joseph Dibble 5422 Humboldt Ave N 01-118-21-33-0066 $ 125.00 Joan Dibble 18160 Trung Duong 1425 55th Ave N 01-118-21-33-0072 125.00 18160 Daniel Odole 5441 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-33-0076 875.00 • 18160 David Kramlinger 5415 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-33-0080 125.00 Stacie Wells City of Brooklyn Center-6301 Shingle Creek Parkway-Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Pagel of 9 Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll(Admin Fines/Citations) 2011 &2012 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed August 02,2012 Skunicipal Code No.22 Levy Runs One Year Levy No. Owner Name(s) Property Address Property ID Amount 18160 Thomas Spencer 5333 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-33-0139 125.00 Rosie Gordon-Spencer 18160 Roger Klingensmith 5302 Emerson Ave N 01-118-21-33-0147 875.00 Margaret Klingensmith 18160 Sherrita Scroggins 5305 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-34-0078 125.00 18160 DR Properties,LLC 5300 Colfax Ave N 01-118-21-34-0083 125.00 18160 Christ Covenant Church 5452 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-34-0118 125.00 18160 Mario Barreto 5624 Camden Ave N 01-118-21-42-0031 125.00 Mai Barreto 18160 Wayne Saathoff 511 56th Ave N 01-118-21-42-0057 125.00 Janet Saathoff 18160 First Birkshire Bus Trust 5930 Earle Brown Dr 02-118-21-12-0010 125.00 Susco Corporation 18160 John Moengen 5707 Irving Ave N 02-118-21-14-0078 125.00 18160 Saeed Jibrell 5744 Logan Ave N 02-118-21-14-0100 875.00 Shadiya Hassan r 18160 U S Bank.N A 5939 John Martin Dr 02-118-21-21-0014 125.00 18160 Franklin Vizhnay 5900 Xerxes Ave N 02-118-21-22-0026 125.00 Maria Vizhnay 08160 Joyce Teekaye 5901 Vincent Ave N 02-118-21-22-0043 125.00 18160 John&Gail Lambert 5900 Washburn Ave N 02-118-21-22-0044 550.00 18160 Bac Home Loans Servicing LP 5612 Lilac Dr N 02-118-21-31-0010 125.00 18160 Margaret Zeelee 5548 Lilac Dr N 02-118-21-31-0013 875.00 18160 Michael Mcalpin 5527 Humboldt Ave N 02-118-21-41-0002 2,750.00 18160 . Cindy Parker 5605 Humboldt Ave N 02-118-21-41-0006 125.00 Michael Wolf 18160 Frank Henry 5533 Irving Ave N 02-118-21-41-0030 750.00 Suzette Jackson Henry 18160 Morrice Fadina 5632 James Ave N 02-118-21-41-0048 125.00 Denise Fadina Mojirade Fadina Samuel Fading 18160 Linda Anderson 5603 James Ave N 02-118-21-41-0059 375.00 Bernadette Anderson_ 18160 Rory Mysliwiec 5659 Knox Ave N 02-118-21-41-0068 4,750.00 18160 Justin Jennrich 5619 Knox Ave N 02-118-2141-0073 730.00 18160 Darwin Kulzer 5617 Logan Ave N 02-118-21-42-0006 1,080.00 Marcia Kulzer 18160 Kia Lee 2101 Brookview Dr 02-118-21-42-0052 375.00 Matrix Lee 8160 James Latzke 5509 Oliver Ave N 02-118-21-42-0070 125.00 Marilyn Oliver 18160 John Danielson 5524 Judy La 02-118-21-42-0089 125.00 Cassandra Danielson City of Brooklyn Center-6301 Shingle Creek Parkway-Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 2 of 9 Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll(Admire Fines/Citations) 2011 &2012 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed August 02,2012 Municipal Code No.22 Levy Runs One Year Levy No. Owner Name(sl Property Address Property ID Amount 18160 Steven Johnson 2000 Ericon Dr 02-118-21-42-0095 250.00 Linda Johnson 18160 Lannette Weiland 2106 Ericon Dr 02-118-21-42-0101 125.00 18160 Luis Juarez-Ferrer 1900 Brookview Dr 02-118-21-42-0111 500.00 18160 TCF National Bank 2018 55th Ave N 02-118-21-43-0075 375.00 18160 Chao Chue Vu 5418 Penn Ave N 02-118-21-43-0131 30.00 Mee Vang Vu 18160 Shane McLean 5436 Logan Ave N 02-118-21-44-0030 375.00 18160 GMAC Mortgage LLC 5321 Humboldt Ave N 02-118-21-44-0036 125.00 18160 Cell Monton LLC 5310 Knox Ave N 02-118-21-44-0062 875.00 18160 Evelyn Ogbevoen 5430 Irving Ave N 02-118-21-44-0078 125.00 18160 Scott Vincent 5345 James Ave N 02-118-21-44-0097 875.00 Rhonda Vincent 18160 Angel Ficken 5339 James Ave N 02-118-21-44-0098 125.00 18160 Cel Menton LLC 5351 Irving Ave N 02-118-21-44-0104 375.00 18160 Sarah Collander 5436 James Ave N 02-118-21-44-0121 250.00 18160 Lamin Jarju 5431 James Ave N 02-118-21-44-0128 375.00 Khadijatou Fatty 18160 Govan Singh 6101 Xerxes Ave N 03-118-21-11-0017 725.00 18160 Wa Yee Xiong 6001 York Ave N 03-118-21-11-0047 875.00• 18160 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 5924 Beard Ave N 03-118-21-11-0071 375.00 18160 Brian Krohn 5924 Abbott Ave N 03-118-21-11-0088 875.00 18160 Charles Bright 5924 York Ave N 03-118-21-11-0124 125.00 18160 Bernice Pendy 5916 Ewing Ave N 03-118-21-12-0027 125.00 18160 US Bank NA 5924 Admiral La 03-118-21-12-0050 3,875.00 18160 Kue Yang 6037 Ewing Ave N 03-118-21-12-0083 500.00 Mai Xiong Thor Yang 18160 Rudy Bjerga 5833 Ewing Ave N 03-118-21-13-0002 125.00 18160 Reyes Colin Sanchez 5843 Ewing Ave N 03-118-21-13-0003 500.00 Gabriela Rodriguez 18160 Drew Kabanuk 5807 Drew Ave N 03-118-21-13-0028 125.00 Terri Kabanuk 18160 Robert Fern 5727 Brooklyn Blvd 03-118-21-13-0092 375.00 18160 Tosh I LLC&Tosh II LLC 5801 Brooklyn Blvd 03-118-21-13-0100 125.00 18160 Jeffrey Berlin 5841 Zenith Ave N 03-118-21-14-0010 125.00 Melissa Gregersen 18160 Michael Haase 6012 Pearson Dr 03-118-21-21-0021 125.00 18160 Federal Nat'l Mortgage Assn 3812 Commodore Dr 03-118-21-21-0026 125.00 18160 Tabith Monari 6024 Halifax PI 03-118-21-21-0053 375.00• Philip Momanyi 18160 George Cole 5913 Halifax Ave N 03-118-21-21-0075 375.00 Paulette Cole City of Brooklyn Center-6301 Shingle Creek Parkway-Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 3 of 9 Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll(Admin Fines/Citations) 2011 &2012 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed August 02, 2012 unicipal Code No.22 Levy Runs One Year Lew No. OwnerName(s) Property Address Property ID Amount 18160 Cody Miller 5900 June Ave N 03-118-21-21-0081 125.00 18160 Shirlee Johanson 6018 Kyle Ave N 03-118-21-22-0015 125.00 18160 Somphaena Soundara 5937 June Ave N 03-118-21-22-0020 . 125.00 Lavonne Soundara 18160 Robert Ford 5803 Shores Dr 03-118-21-23-0026 125.00 Eleanor Ford 18160 Melody Scott 5819 Halifax Ave N 03-118-21-24-0101 250.00 Douglas Witz 18160 Superior Development Inc 3901 Burquest La 03-118-21-31-0041 125.00 18160 On Time Contractors Inc 5349 Sailor La 03-118-21-43-0013 125.00 18,160 Cantlin Lake Properties 5240 Drew Ave N 10-118-21-12-0005 230.00 18160 Mai Xiong 5247 Drew Ave N 10-118-21-12-0012 850.00 18160 Real Assets II,LLC 5221 Drew Ave N 10-118-21-12-0017 125.00 18160 J&M Homes II LLC 5214 Ewing Ave N 10-118-21-12-0023 1,025.00 18160 David Buth 5120 Ewing Ave N 10-118-21-12-0041 125.00 Beth Hansen-Buth Lynn Macy 18160 Daniel Brewer 5219 Ewing Ave N 10-118-21-12-0060 3,875.00 408160 TCF Bank 5137 Ewing Ave N 10-118-21-12-0071 125.00 8160 William Krier 5125 Ewing Ave N 10-118-21-12-0073 125.00 Cami Krier ' 18160 Cory Clark 3334 49th Ave N 10-118-21-13-0009 125.00 Nancy Clark 18160 Russell Smith 4937 Brooklyn Blvd 10-118-21-14-0012 125.00 18160 Siayee Vue 4950 Abbott Ave N 10-118-21-14-0044 780.00 Soeurn Sut 18160 Angelo Garcia' 5222 Great View Ave 10-118-21-21-0019 375.00 Collen Garcia 18160 Anthony Enger 5205 Twin Lake Blvd E 10-118-21-21-0043 125.00 Gretchen Enger 18160 James Holmes 5115 France Ave N 10-118-21-21-0067 125.00 Lois Holmes 18160 Nationwide Advantage Mtg Co 3853 Oak St 10-118-21-21-0078 125.00 18160 Richard&Elizabeth Becht 4718 Twin Lake Ave 10-118-21-32-0040 250.00 18160 Ita Ekah 4216 Lakebreeze Ave 10-118-21-32-0063 2,050.00 18160 Lauderdale Properties Inc 4807 Azelia Ave N 10-118-21-32=0065 500.00 18160 Chia Mee Vue 7236 Bryant Ave N 25-119-21-31-0030 375.00 Khoua Lord 18160 Doris Jefferson 7243 Bryant Ave N 25-119-21-31-0045 375.00 Treacy Jefferson 8160 Ciatta Freeman 7217 Camden Ave N 25-119-21-31-0083 10,000.00 18160 Tim McDougall 7211 Camden Ave N 25-119-21-31-0084 125.00 Alexa Malmquist City of Brooklyn Center-6301 Shingle Creek Parkway-Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 4.of 9 Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll(Admin Fines/Citations) 2011 &2012 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed August 02,2012 Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year• Levy No. Owner Name(s) Property Address Property ID Amount 18160 Rick Pha 1101 73rd Ave N 25-119-21-32-0001 125.00 Youa Vang Tom Vang 18160 Garald Schake 7241 Fremont Ave N 25-119-21-32-0011 750.00 Beverly Schake 18160 Valorie Brady 7249 Dupont Ave N 25-119-21-32-0096. 375.00 18160 Augustine Aghayedo 7031 Emerson Ave N 25-119-21-33=0028 500.00 Agharese Aghayedo 18160 Anthony Brown 7024 Fremont Ave N 25-119-21-33-0038 125.00 Theodora Brown 18160 Lenore Carlson 7109 Willow La N 25-119-21-41-0020 125.00 18160 Fed Home Loan Mtg Corp 6931 Willow La N 25-119-21-43-0025 125.00 18160 BAC Home Loans Servicing 7107 Logan Ave N 26-119-21-42-0024 875.00 18160 Eugene Noding 7006 Morgan Ave N 26-119-21-43-0052 1,875.00 Marlys Noding 18160 Joyce Jallah 7018 Morgan Ave N 26-119-21-43-0054 500.00 18160 Joyce Waalk 7000 Oliver Ave N 26-119-21.43-0087 1,875.00 18160 Troy Misko 7012 Oliver Cir 26-119-21-43-0090 125.00 18160 Janis Kennedy 1719 70th Ave N 26-119-21-44-0042 125.00 18160 Shawn Banks 7137 Grimes Ave N 27-119-21-31-0034 425.00 • Djuana Banks 18160 Rodney Jansen 7106 Halifax Ave N 27-119-21-31-0042 1,125.00 18160 Xi Lin 7143 France Ave N 27-119-21-31-0049 125.00 Yl Lm 18160 Ricky Holifield 7101 Kyle Ave N 27-119-21-32-0017 125.00 Latonya Holifield 18160 Steven Benner 7206 Noble Ave N 27-119-21-32-0049 125.00 Karina Benner 18160 Ken Huisinga 4413 71st Ave N 27-119-21-32-0062 125.00 Paula Huisinga 18160 Anthony Francis 7125 Kyle Ave N 27-119-21-32-0084 125.00 18160 Stephanie Kujawa 7112 June Ave N 27-119-21-32-0103 125.00 Brett Robideau 18160 Judith O'Dean 6915 Major Ave N 27-119-21-33-0042 1,500.00 18160 Majed Wazwaz 4600 69th Ave N 27-119-21-33-0044 125.00 Maria Wazwaz 18160 Sonya Herr 6930 Halifax Ave N 27-119-21-34-0039 125.00 18160 Long Yang 3909 71st Ave N 27-119-21-34-0081 125.00 Pa Yia Yang 18160 Wells Fargo Bank NA 3700 Violet Ave 27-119-21-42-0103 125.00 18160 Yardley Redevelopment LLC 7025 Drew Ave N 27-119-21-43-0016 1,375.00 18160 Specialty Contracting Sery 4706 Wingard La 28-119-21-41-0140 875.00 • 18160 Sang Hui Jacobson 7203 Perry Ct E 28-119-21-41-0151 125.00 City of Brooklyn Center-6301 Shingle Creek Parkway-Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 5 of 9 Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll (Admin Fines/Citations) 2011 &2012 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed August 02,2012 Ounicipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year Levy No. Owner Name(s) Property Address Property ID Amount 18160 Mn Services, Inc 7240 Brooklyn Blvd 28-119-21-41-0204 125.00 18160 Viola Gobah 4714 Wingard La 28-119-21-41-0207 375.00 18160 Jessica Gawron 5332 71st Cir 28-119-21-42-0021 125.00 Steven Gawron 18160 Vivian Olson 7164 Unity Ave N 28-119-21-42-0034 875.00 18160 Edward Roe 6906 Toledo Ave N 28-119-21-43-0019 125.00 Judith Roe 18160 PNC Bank N A 5024 71 st Ave N 28-119-21-43-0023 375.00 18160 Victorino Pena 5200 70th Ave N 28-119-21-43-0035 125.00 18160 Myrna Hubert 5300 70th Cir 28-119-21-43-0095 3,875.00 18160 Mary Nachtwey 6931 Perry Ave N 28-119-21-44-0005 1,230.00 18160 Christian Vitale 6825 Noble Ave N 33-119-21-11-.0002 125.00 S Vitale 18160 Gene Maguire 6839 Perry Ave N 33-119-21-11-0038 375.00 Joanne Maguire 18160 U S BANK N A 6712 Perry Ave N 33-119-21-11-0050 125.00 ; 18160 Joey Nienaber 6818 Quail Ave N 33-119-21-11-0062 125.00 18160 Pla Yang 6830 Scott Ave N 33-119-21-12-0059 250.00 Neng Heur Salay Her Jua Thao 18160 Gene Rattei 5200 65th Ave N 33-119-21-13-0051 125.00 Mary Rattei *18160 Joseph Okrakene 5124 65th Ave N 33-119-21-13-0053 250.00 Christy Okrakene 18160 Real Assets II LLC 5125 Howe La 33-119-21-13-0084 125.00 18160 GMAC Mortgage LLC 5131 Howe La 33-119-21-13-0085 125.00 18160 William Carmichael 5004 66th Ave N 33-119-21-14-0069 375.00 Laura Carmichael 18160 Joshua Peterson 6337 Noble Ave N 33-119-21-41-0010 125.00 18160 Adan Chamu Dominguez 6336 Orchard Ave N 33-119-21-41-0015 .125.00 Rosario Garcia 18160 Bee Yang 6400 Orchard Ave N 33-119-21-41-0017 500.00 Houa Lor 18160 Todd Vlasaty 4707 Eleanor La 33-119-21-41-0026 250.00 18160 Antonio Camposeco 6331 Perry Ave N 33-119-21-41-0075 125.00 18160 Erin Leegaard 6319 Perry Ave N 33-119-21-41-0077 3,250.00 18160 Donald Fitzsimonds 6332 Quail Ave N 33-119-21-41-0093 125.00 18160 Greg Gerulis 6437 Scott Ave N 33-119-21-42-0036 125.00 18160 Deketa Evans 5330 62nd Ave N 33-119-21-43-0080 3,875.00 160 Telly Nickens Sr 6124 Quail Ave N 33-119-21-44-0018 1,875.00 Charo Nickens City of Brooklyn Center-6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 6 of 9 Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll (Admin Fines/Citations) 2011 &2012 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed August 02, 2012 Municipal Code No.22 Levy Runs One Year • Levy No. Owner Name(s) Property Address Property ID Amount 18160 Hector Auzaldo 6106 Quail Ave N 33-119-21-44-0021 125.00 Maria Flores 18160 J Worth Construction,LLC 6825 Drew Ave N 34-119-21-12-0043 125.00 18160 Clarence Dudley 6510 Brooklyn Blvd 34-119-21-13-0010 3,000.00 18160 Solomon Frank-Sawari 3400 66th Ave N 34-119-21-13-0012 1,550.00 18160 Sarah Jacobs 3500 66th Ave N 34-119-21-13-0016 125.00 Justin Jacobs 18160 MN Housing Fin Ag 6526 Ewing Ave N 34-119-21-13-0040 125.00 18160 Tuuyen Tran 6538 Ewing Ave N 34-119-21-13-0042 125.00 18160 Ebrima Tourey 6537 Chowen Ave N 34-119-21-13-0045 125.00 Ramatoulie Touray 18160 Janis Salo 6543 Beard Ave N 34-119-21-13-0060 125.00 18160 MAE Properties LLP 6500 Brooklyn Blvd 34-119-21-13-0084 2,000.00 MAE Properties LLP 18160 Michael Schmitz 3001 Thurber Rd 34-119-21-14-0001 125.00 Sandra Schmitz 18160 Adolf Zydowicz 3112 67th Ave N 34-119-21-14-0004 125.00 Anna Zydowicz 18160 Kou Vang 3106 67th Ave N 34-119-21-14-0005 125.00 Yer Lee 18160 Paul Gallup 6715 France Ave N 34-119-21-21-0012 275.00 • 18160 Agnes Austin Houston 6714 Grimes Ave N 34-119-21-21-0017 125.00 Leroy Houston 18160 Michael Barlow 4619 66th Ave N 34-119-21-23-0026 125.00 18160 Laura Ben 4306 65th Ave N 34-119-21-23-0065 480.00 18160 Ramon Mexicano Gaspar 4230 66th Ave N 34-119-21-24-0031 375.00 Dora Rodriguez Margarita Padilla Jesus Hernandez Gomez 18160 Gena Gaal 4207 Winchester La 34-119-21-24-0043 125.00 18160 Karlie Hammes 4212 65th Ave N 34-119-21-24-0048 1,875.00 18160 Mao Thao 6318 Grimes Ave N 34-119-21-31-0025 125.00 Her Cha Yang 18160 Amay Yang 6308 Halifax Dr 34-119-21-31-0031 125.00 18160 Sheng Lee 6424 Major Ave N 34-119-21-32-0014 125.00 18160 Dennis Wells 6407 Kyle Ave N 34-119-21-32-0114 125.00 Deborah Wells 18160 William Snyder 6137 Kyle Ave N 34-119-21-33-0032 125.00 David Tummire 18160 Christine Brown 6224 Lee Ave N 34-119-21-33-0037 375.00 18160 Houa Lee 6124 Lee Ave N 34-119-21-33-0099 125.00 Mai Thao • 18160 Evan Anderson 3906 Janet La 34-119-21-34-0013 125.00 Katrina Knoepke City of Brooklyn Center-6301 Shingle Creek Parkway-Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 7 of 9 Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll(Adrnin Fines/Citations) 2011 &2012 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed August 02, 2012 equnicipal Code No.22 Levy Runs One Year Lew No. Owner Name(s) Property Address Property ID Amount 18160 Gabriel Sayee 6121 France Ave N 34-119-21-34-0017 875.00 Bernice Sayee 18160 BAC Home Loans Servicing 4212 62nd Ave N 34-119-21-34-0042 125.00 18160 Linus Moua 3807 62nd Ave N 34-119-21-34-0073 125.00 Phao Vang 18160 Jennifer Layman 3000 64th Ave N 34-119-21-41-0017 125.00 18160 Michael Parks 3218 64th Ave N 34-119-21-41-0028 875.00 Suzette Parks 18160 Xuyan Lang 3312 64th Ave N 34-119-21-41-0032 300.00 18160 Fabulous Buys LLC 3207 64th Ave N 34-119-21-41-0044 125.00 18160 Sau Tran 3018 Ohenry Rd 34-119-21-41-0064 375.00 Ut Thi Nguyen 18160 JPMorgan Chase Bank NA 3307 Ohenry Rd 34-119-21-41-0093 125.00 18160 Commers-Clover II,LLP 6331 Beard Ave N 34-119-21-42-0023 1,050.00 18160 BCK Enterprises LLC 6300 Brooklyn Blvd 34-119-21-42-0030 11000.00 18160 Kodjo Oyegade 6236 Chowen Ave N 34-119-21-43-0019 875.00 Grace Ogundare 18160 Vicki Goff 3018 Mumford Rd 34-119-21-44-0040 125.00 Patricia Tully 8160 Rick Peterson 3119 62nd Ave N 34-119-21-44-0078 125.00 Renee Peterson 18160 Mitilde Ong 3013 62nd Ave N 34-119-21-44-0103 3,875.00 18160 Moeen Masood 6753 Humboldt Ave N 35-119-21-11-0017 125.00 18160 Li Chwen Su 6761 Humboldt Ave N 35-119-21-11-0020 300.00 18160 Moeen Masood 6765 Humboldt Ave N 35-119-21-11-0022 375.00 Shehla Alavi 18160 ShoeMiller Properties LLC 1537 Humboldt PI N 35-119-21-11-0026 375.00 18160 1975 Robert Street Partners 2101 Freeway Blvd 35-119-21-13-0006 1,375.00 18160 Wells Fargo Bank NA 2925 69th Ln N 35-119-21-22-0024 125.00 18160 Roland Livingstone 2906 66th Ave N 35-119-21-23-0008 125.00 18160 Brian Peterson 6400 Brooklyn Dr 35-119-21-31-0004 125.00 18160 Daniel Kurran 2819 64th Ave N 35-119-21-32-0065 375.00 18160 Anthony Toft 2913 64th Ave N 35-119-21-32-0068 125.00 Richard Toft Terri Toft 18.160 From Mat to Life LLC 2701 Ohenry Rd 35-119-21-32-0086 125.00 18160 Jake Klein 2919 Ohenry Rd 35-119-21-32-0098 3,875.00 18160 Sufeng Zheng 2813 66th Ave N 35-119-21-32-0114 3,875.00 18160 Gregory Chileen 6857 Dallas Rd 36-119-21-12-0061 250.00 Jolynn Chileen 8160 Richard Marsh 6817 Bryant Ave N 36-119-21-21-0031 3,875.00 Lucille Marsh City of Brooklyn Center-6301 Shingle Creek Parkway-Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 8 of 9 Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll(Admin Fines/Citations) 2011 &2012 Administrative Penalty/Citation Printed August 02,2012 Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year • Levy No. Owner Name(s) Property Address Property ID Amount 18160 Ella Paxton 6736 Colfax Ave N 36-119-21-21-0037 125.00 Frances Akindele Akeem Akindele 18160 Kenneth Fountain 6718 Colfax Ave N 36-119-21-21-0040 375.00 Michele Fountain 18160 Chang Yang 6701 Aldrich Ave N 36-119-21-21-0083 250.00 Chia Her 18160 Brenda Haynes 6719 Camden Ave N 36-119-21-21-0100 355.00 Greg Forsberg 18160 Laurie Randall 6801 Aldrich Ave N 36-119-21-21-0107 125.00 1816 y 0 Samuel Hollows 1304 68th Ln N 36-119-21-22-0056 125.00 18160 Rachael Omao 1320 68th Ln N 36-119-21-22-0060 125.00 Cyrus Keriago 18160 Samantha Streif 6600 Bryant Ave N 36-119-21-24-0020 375.00 18160 Sheila Johnson 6610 Colfax Ave N 36-119-21-24-0058 125.00 18160 Troy Jones 6425 Fremont Ave N 36-119-21-32-0034 150.00 . 18160 Jane Oltman 6407 Fremont Ave N 36-119-21-32-0048 1,175.00 Glenn Oltman 18160 Beverly Stuart 1205 63rd La N 36-119-21-33-0064 125.00 18160 Jeffrey Smith 600 62nd Ave N 36-119-21-34.0001 250.00• Susan Smith 18160 Mccutchan,Trustethomas Mary 6131 Aldrich Ave N 36-119-21-34-0006 875.00 18160 Cel Monton LLC 6114 Dupont Ave N 36-119-21-34-0036 125.00 18160 David Dahlgren 6138 Dupont Ave N 36-119-21-34-0039 125.00 18160 Francis Crowley 6225 Bryant Ave N 36-119-21-34-0049 625.00 18160 Pia Yia Yang 6207 Colfax Ave N 36-119-21-34-0068 125.00 Long Yang 18160 Steve Zachman 6200 Dupont Ave N 36-119-21-34-0070 1,000.00 18160 Thomas Brown 6220 Bryant Ave N 36-119-21-34-0081 500.00 Jennifer Brown 18160 Richelle Hanna 6116 Aldrich Ave N 36-119-21-34-0092 250.00 Total: 149,765.00 • City of Brooklyn Center-6301 Shingle Creek Parkway-Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 9 of 9 Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll(Administrative Vacant Building Registration) 2011 &2012 Administrative Vacant Building Registration Printed August 02,2012 Wunicipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year Levy No. Owner Name(s) Property Address Property ID Amount 18159 Houmpheng Bounsavath 5438 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-34-0109 1,000.00 18159 Margarita Pirin Cortes 5614 Camden Ave N 01-118-21-42-0032 ' 1,000.00 18159 Hogenson Properties Ltd 3813 Urban Ave 27-119-21-43-0063 1,000.00 18159 Gregory Priglmeier 5307 Winchester La 33-119-21-13-0041 400.00 18159 Ralph Gohman 6413 Orchard Ave N 33-119-21-41-0036 1,000.00 18159 Danny Vo 3125 66th Ave N 34-119-21-14-0060 1,000.00 Christina Duong Total: 5,400.00 { • City of Brooklyn Center-6301 Shingle Creek Parkway-Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 1 of 1 Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll (Abatement) 2011 &2012 Abatement Printed August 02,2012 Municipal Code No.22 Levy Runs One Year • Levy No. Owner Name(s) Property Address Property ID Amount 18158 Hector Hernandez 6013 Colfax Ave N 01-118-21-21-0015 380.00 18158 James Daley 5941 Aldrich Ave N 01-118-21-21-0031 365.00 Joyce Daley 18158 Wells Fargo Bank N A 5750 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-24-0043 260.00 18158 Glen Sande 5729 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-24-0046 250.00 18158 Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr Co 5646 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-31-0098 350.00 18158 DR Properties,LLC 5300 Colfax Ave N 01-118-21-34-0083 250.00 18158 Houmpheng Bounsavath 5438 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-34-0109 275.00 I 18158 Federal Na Ave N 02-118-21-14-0008 325.00 Nat'l Mortgage Assn 5715 Knox Av 18158 Dexter Williams 5728 Irving Ave N 02-118-21-14-0093 345.00 Charlene Guerrero 18158 Vivian Ballah 5405 Queen Ave N 02-118-21-34-0034 700.00 Edwin Swaray 18158 Deb Talatala 5913 Xerxes Ave N 03-118-21-11-0117 550,00 Gene Talatala 18158 Bernice Pend Y 5916 Ewin g Ave N 03-118-21-12-0027 265.00 18158 Courtney Thao Tran 5836 York Ave N 03-118-21-14-0004 466.00 Phon g Nguyen N 18158 Jeffrey Berlin 5841 Zenith Ave N 03-118-21-14-0010 240.00 Melissa Gre g ersen 18158 Mary Ann Snow 5549 Brooklyn Blvd 03-118-21-42-0018 1,215.00 • 18158 Branch Bankin g and T r ust Co 6930 Oliver Ave N 26-119-21-43-0037 200.00 18158 Neighborhood Youth Community Development 7018 James Ave N 26-119-21-44-0029 300.00 18158 Ken Huisinga 4413 71st Ave N 27-119-21-32-0062 375.00 Paula Huisinga 18158 Hogenson Properties Ltd 3813 Urban Ave 27-119-21-43-0063 365.00 18158 Michael Braun 6700 Perry Ave N 33-119-21-11-0052 330.00 18158 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 5313 67th Ave N 33-119-21-12-0050 300.00 18158 Meela Thao 6525 Noble Ave N 33-119-21-14-0004 600.00 Cherzong Thao 18158 Wells Fargo Bank NA 5319 Eleanor La 33-119-21-42-0112 305.00 18158 Michelle Murch 6707 Drew Ave N 34-119-21-12-0026 625.00 18158 Kou Vang 3106 67th Ave N 34-119-21-14-0005 350.00 Yer Lee 18158 Laura Ben' 4306 65th Ave N 34-119-21-23-0065 265.00 18158 BAC Home Loans Servicing 4212 62nd Ave N 34-119-21-34-0042 200.00 18158 Linus Moua 3807 62nd Ave N 34-119-21-34-0073 275.00 Phao Vang 18158 Sau Tran 3018 Ohenry Rd 34-119-21-41-0064 325.00 Ut Thi Nguyen 18158 MN Housing Finance Agency 3007 Ohenry Rd 34-119-21-41-0081 350.00• 18158 Xay Xiong 3107 65th Ave N 34-119-21-41-0112 340.00 City of Brooklyn Center-6301 Shingle Creek Parkway-Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Pagel of 2 Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll(Abatement) 2011 &2012 Abatement Printed August 02,2012 Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year Levy No. Owner Name(s) Property Address Property ID Amount 18158 Latin Work Remodeling 6701 Bryant Ave N 36-119-21-21-0075 1,820.00 18158 Sheila Johnson 6610 Colfax Ave N 36-119-21-24-0058 715.00 Total: 14,276.00 r r City of Brooklyn Center-6301 Shingle Creek Parkway-Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 2 of 2 • City Council Agenda Item No. 6e • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM • DATE: 7 August 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Daniel Jordet, Director of Finan SUBJECT: Resolution Calling for a Pu 41i earing on Proposed Special Assessments for Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider adoption of a resolution calling for a public hearing on Monday,September 10,2012 on the matter of unpaid public utility service accounts. Background: One of the City's methods for collecting unpaid utility service accounts is to assess them against the property being served. Under Minnesota Statutes (M.S. 477.075, Subd. 3f) municipalities are allowed to certify unpaid utilities to the property taxes for a parcel served by the utility. City Code section 4-105 indicates that assessment will be the primary method for collection of unpaid utilities. Council Policy 2.30.4 names assessment as the primary method for collection of unpaid utility service accounts outside the normal billing and collection procedure. For the Fall assessment of 2012, accounts included in the preliminary assessment roll attached to this memorandum include those accounts delinquent and unpaid as of June 30, 2012. This list of • accounts is sorted and presented by address number of the customer. There are 889 accounts totaling $ 462,366 in unpaid utility charges, penalties and interest. A first letter was sent to 1,426 accounts informing them that assessment is a possibility. As a result of that letter 537 accounts have been paid. Upon adoption of the attached resolution a second letter will be sent to the remaining accounts informing them of the amount due on their account, the potential for assessment of the amount to-their 2013 property taxes and the Public Hearing to be held on September 10, 2012. Following that hearing the Council will be asked to consider a resolution certifying the amount still unpaid against the property's 2013 property taxes. Budget Issues: There are no exceptional budget issues to consider. Council Goals: Ongoing: 2. We will ensure the financial stability of the City 5. We will ensure the City drinking water is high quality and that the storm water is properly managed DJ: • Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Property ID# Account# I Name Service Address Certification Balance Cycle 2511921320001 0022390004 RICK PHA 110173RD AVE N $541.94 Cycle 2 3611921330017 0088870003 CHRISTY HAYES 1112 62ND AVE N $684.92 Cycle 4 2511921330015 0022050004 CHRISTIANA RUE 1112 EMERSON LA $819.66 Cycle 2 2511921320081 0021660001- PAUL YEE 1200 72ND AVE N $120.89 Cycle 2 3611921330063 0001000000 TIFFANY LATTIER 120163RD LA N $155.09 Cycle 4 3611921320090 0099430003 STEVE CRISS 1207 65TH AVE N $277.90 Cycle 4 3611921330070 0001070003 EMMANUAL PAYMAH 123163RD LA N $693.41 Cycle 4 0111821320030 0077990007 TERRY ROBERTS 1300 55TH AVE.N $675.17 Cycle 6 3611921220055 0060182305 SCOTT HARTMANN HOLDINGS LLC 1300 68TH LN N $427.12 Cycle 2 2511921320043 0021210005 BRENDA ROBERTS 130172ND AVE N $739.17 Cycle 2 3611921320038 0099180004 NALEE VANG 1307 65TH AVE N $160.37 Cycle 4 3611921220057 0060182107 KONRAD WAGNER 1308 68TH LN N $206.55 Cycle 2 3611921220058 0060182008 KONRAD WAGNER 1312 68TH LN N $153.64 Cycle 2 3611921330076 0001130005 BONNIE JUDE 1315 63RD LA N $458.20 Cycle 4 3611921220113 0060170409 MARIE HAMMONDS 1315 67TH LN N $758.40 Cycle 2 3611921220060 0060181802 DIONNE THOMAS 1320 68TH LN N $332.72 Cycle 2 3611921220095 0060180606 KONRAD WAGNER 1325 68TH LN N $147.17 Cycle 2 3611921220090 0060181604 LISA VITA 1328 68TH LN N $723.33 Cycle 2 3611921220109 0060171506 THOMAS MURPHY 133067TH LN N $72.74 Cycle 2 3611921330080 0001170001 EMILY JOHNSON 1333 63RD LA N $684.28 Cycle 4 3611921220097 0060180804 MARY KAY REVARD 1333 68TH LN N $729.72 Cycle 2 0111821230007 0088410008 GREGORY COLEMAN 1400 57TH AVE N $730.80 Cycle 4 2611921410068 0014690007 KENNETH NEAL 1506 72ND AVE N $189.41 Cycle 2 3511921110027 0012900200 PETER IMASUEN 1543 HUMBOLDT PL N $172.25 Cycle 2 3511921110044 0060790800 HEIDI NERMOE 1600 68TH LN N $637.79 Cycle 2 3511921110056 0060790404 TODD FALLS 160167TH LN N $411.35 Cycle 2 2611921410043 0014740000 DEBORAH BLACK 160172ND AVE N $588.78 Cycle 2 2611921410092 0014350008 CHAD MOREN 1607 73RD AVE N $679.41 Cycle 2 3511921110054 0060790602 OLIVER ANDURU 1609 67TH LN N $358.49 Cycle 2 2611921410093 0014360007 LES OSTRANDER 1613 73RD AVE N $168.29 Cycle 2 2611921410004 0014430008 SHAWN M THORP 1700 WOODBINE LA $874.73 Cycle 2 0211821140097 0086720002 ADEMOLA ADEGUN 1703 59TH AVE N $191.60 Cycle 4 2611921440040 0012980004 KHAMPHET KEOHAVONG 1707 70TH AVE N $196.01 Cycle 2 • • • 2611921440077 0012820002 RODERICK NEAL 1708 IRVING LA N $894.97 Cycle 2 2611921440024 0013010009 SANGBAN W NGAIMA 180170TH AVE N $663.92 Cycle 2 2611921440089 0012780008 SEAN WILLIAMSON 1820 IRVING LA N $684.68 Cycle 2 0211821440031 0073060003 SCOTT HOLTHUS 182155TH AVE N $762.93 Cycle 6 2611921440092 0012770009 UZOMA PRINCE ABANONU 1821 IRVING LA N $231.24 Cycle 2 0211821420111 0076180006 LUIS JUAREZ-FERRER 1900 BROOKVIEW DR $827.76 Cycle 6 2611921420026 0011740003 RICHARD VANDENBOS 1906 71ST AVE N $355.58 Cycle 2 0211821420095 0076890000 STEVEN JOHNSON 2000 ERICON DR $150.92 Cycle 6 0211821420047 0076120002 MARGARET ENGSTRAND 2012 BROOKVIEW DR $209.82 Cycle 6 2611921430077 0010780000 DRAKE M BELL 210171ST AVE N• $686.78 Cycle 2 0211821420101 0076830006 JAMES SNOW 2106 ERICON DR $543.99 Cycle 6 0211821430118 0072020008 FRANCISCO HERNANDEZ JR 2107 55TH AVE N - $304.23 Cycle 6 2611921430098 0010670003 JEFFREY SIMON JR 2107 70TH AVE N $655.81 Cycle 2 2611921430104 0010590102 JOYCE 0 HACK 2112 69TH AVE N $1,169.69 Cycle 2 2611921340003 0010050008 RYAN LOVLEIN 2200 69TH AVE N $278.86 Cycle 2 0211821430127 0071930009 MARY BETH DAVIDSON 2206 54TH AVE N $140.12 Cycle 6 0211821310036 0076750006 KEVIN SMITH 2306 ERICON DR $774.79 Cycle 6 0211821310008 0077180005 MATTHEW HAWTON 2307 BROOKVIEW DR $719.41 Cycle 6 0211821310024 0077270004 DARREN MITCHELL 2328 BROOKVIEW DR $647.78 Cycle 6 0211821310047 0076570008 MARK FOLLMER 2348 BROOKVIEW DR $628.88 Cycle 6 0211821310046 0076580007 GLADYS BYRD 2407 ERICON DR $83.07 Cycle 6 3511921320050 0034660000 ERVIN WRIGHT 2606 64TH AVE N $251.33 Cycle 5 3511921320022 0034740000 JOEL BRYANT 2619 65TH AVE N $416.16 Cycle 5 3511921320082 0034340009 DALE CERNOHLAVEK 2700 OHENRY RD $686.68 Cycle 5 3511921320058 0034410000 SHARON MEIER 270164TH AVE N $714.49 Cycle 5 3511921320109 0034050004 GAYLE VAN DE MAAT 2706 63RD AVE N $188.03 Cycle 5 3511921320045 0034610005 ROBIN HALL 2712 64TH AVE N $254.01 Cycle 5 3511921320079 0034310002 MAJEEDAH LIPFORD 2718 OHENRY RD $219.30 Cycle 5 3511921330050 0037660007 ALLISON SNYDER 2806 MUMFORD RD $374.24 Cycle 5 3511921230015 0016320309 KIMBERLY HOODIE 2812 67TH LN N $686.90 Cycle 1 3511921330049 0037670006 DANA BACKSTROM 2812 MUMFORD RD $155.94 Cycle 5 3511921230017 0016320507 NANCY BLOM 2820 67TH LN N $684.27 Cycle 1 3511921230019 0016320705 CHAD THOMAS 2828 67TH LN N $502.49 Cycle 1 3511921230034 0016321406 BUILD BY DESIGN INC. 284167TH LN N $786.73 Cycle 1 • ! • 3511921320032 0034840008 SHELLY KUIPER 290165TH AVE N $63.89 Cycle 5 3511921320017 0034900000 HENRY R SCHWARTZ 2906 65TH AVE N $503.95 Cycle 5 3511921230008 0035110203 ROLAND LIVINGSTONE 2906 66TH AVE N $763.16 Cycle 5 3511921330024 0037370003 GEORGE BROWN 2907 63RD AVE N $660.18 Cycle 5 3511921230037 0016311605 TINA WEBER 2915 67TH LN N $174.11 Cycle 1 3511921320098 0034210004 JAKE KLEIN 2919 OHENRY RD $166.97 Cycle 5 3511921220024 0016291104 ERIK TAMTE 2925 69TH LN N $271.67 Cycle 1 3511921220018 0016290502 SARAH ROSSMAN 2932 69TH LN N $429.81 Cycle 1 3411921410017 0033150003 JENNIFER LAYMAN 3000 64TH AVE N $793.28 Cycle 5 3411921140052 0032150004 CHERISE M LINGWALL 300166TH AVE N $179.86 Cycle 5 3411921140001 0008740001 MICHAEL SCHMITZ 3001 THURBER RD $225.71 Cycle 1 3411921140008 0008480004 SHERRAL LUNDQUIST 3012 67TH AVE N $703.56 Cycle 1 3411921440103 0035450005 MITILDE ONG 3013 62ND AVE N $307.96 Cycle 5 3411921440038 0036870003 DARLENE PASLEY 3013 NASH RD $508.46 Cycle 5 3411921410126 0032490004 ROBERT W STRAUCH 3013 QUARLES RD $990.07 Cycle 5 3411921140081 0032440009 MARYANN GARDING 3016 QUARLES RD $627.16 Cycle 5 0311821110014 0038420005 CHRISTOPHER P FAHEY 3018 61ST AVE N $796.95 Cycle 5 3411921410064 0033460006 ROSA VELAZQUEZ RAMOS 3018 OHENRY RD $564.04 Cycle 5 3411921140014 0008420000 CARL F GOSSEN 3019 67TH AVE N $717.36 Cycle 1 3411921410127 0032500000 TIMUTI NEEPAY 3019 QUARLES RD $572.86 Cycle 5 3411921140084 0032510009 JEFFREY JOHNSON 3025 QUARLES RD $707.62 Cycle 5 3411921140016 0008400002 YER MOUA 310167TH AVE N $200.26 Cycle 1 3411921410084 0033540005 NATHAN EAGLE 3101 OHENRY RD $741.29 Cycle 5 3411921440075 0035740009 YING VANG 3102 LAWRENCE RD $204.26 Cycle 5 3411921140042 0032090002 KEVIN SCHWAGEL 3106 66TH AVE N $648.40 Cycle 5 3411921140005 0008510008' KOU VANG 310667TH AVE N $143.21 Cycle 1 3411921140017 0008390005 VERONICA AMAYA-MENDEZ 3107 67TH AVE N $629.50 Cycle 1 1011821140020 0069350004 TERRY LARSON 3112 49TH AVE N $713.31 Cycle 6 3411921140004 0008520007 ADOLF ZYDOWICZ 3112 67TH AVE N $446.68 Cycle 1 3411921140077 0032400003 YOUA YANG 3112 QUARLES RD $550.21 Cycle 5, 3411921140058 0032210006 PHILIP JUDGE JR 3113 66TH AVE N $734.91 Cycle 5 3411921140018 0008380006 RENEE WHITTAKER 3113 67TH AVE N $404.50 Cycle 1 3411921440108 0035500007 PERRY MARTIN 3117 LAWRENCE RD $756.60 Cycle 5 0311821110010 0038380001 FOLUSO FAMUYIDE 3118 61ST AVE N $777.46 Cycle 5 • ! • 3411921440078 0035770006 RENEE T PETERSON 3119 62ND AVE N $675.45 Cycle 5 3411921140059 0032220005 TINA KNUTH 3119 66TH AVE N $725.42 Cycle 5 3411921140088 0032550005 NICHOLAS HALUBAR 3119 QUARLES RD $308.80 Cycle 5 3411921410009 0033850008 KYLE NGUYEN 3200 63RD AVE N $159.05 Cycle 5 3411921440024 0036780004 BRUCE WILSON 3200 MUMFORD RD $580.12 Cycle 5 3411921410060 0033420000 ROBYN JANUSZEWSKI 3200 POE RD $708.19 Cycle 5 3411921140075 0032380007 KENNETH FRIDAY 3200 QUARLES RD $570.28 Cycle 5 3411921140029 0032710005 JENNIFER KURTH 3206 65TH AVE N $693.86 Cycle 5 3411921110117 0008550004 BENNY SAN DSTROM 3206 67TH AVE N $489.21 Cycle 1 3411921440095 0035700003 JOSE GUTIERREZ 3206 LAWRENCE RD $445.19 Cycle 5 3411921440025 0036370004 BRANDON LOGEMANN 3206 MUMFORD RD $705.09 Cycle 5 3411921140030 0032700006 TANYA HOSKINS 3212 65TH AVE N $700.23 Cycle 5 3411921440082 0035810000 AISLIN FRANKLIN 3213 62ND AVE N $724.86 Cycle 5 3411921140091 0032580002 KIONNE ROBINSON 3213 QUARLES RD $1,059.72 Cycle 5 3411921110105 0008640003 MARK CARROLL 3213 THURBER RD $291.40 Cycle 1 1011821410013 0069230008 DORETTE PHILBEN 3223 49TH AVE N $116.04 Cycle 6 0311821110005 .0038330006 NICHOLE CHRISTENSEN 3300 61ST AVE N $168.29 Cycle 5 3411921140033 0032670001 ELIZABETH WORSEHLEAY 3300 65TH AVE N $659.17 Cycle 5 3411921140071 0032340001 DAVID GLAUVITZ 3300 QUARLES RD $682.61 Cycle 5 1011821140052 0069210000 BRANDON FLEEMAN 330149TH AVE N $655.76 Cycle 6 3411921440054 0036260007 GARY OLSON 3301 MUMFORD RD $577.71 Cycle 5 3411921410053 0033350009 STEVEN LEBLANC 3306 POE RD $673.08 Cycle 5 1011821120056 0064090001 TWIN LAKES MANOR 3307 53RD AVE N $1,563.45 Cycle 6 1011821120056 0064100008 TWIN LAKES MANOR 331153RD AVE N $2,118.29 Cycle 6 3411921410069 0033650002 ALBERT D COOKE 3313 POE RD $828.57 Cycle 5 1011821120057 0064110007 TWIN LAKES MANOR 3315 53RD AVE N $1,813.07 Cycle 6 3411921440016 0037090007 LINDA ROBERTS 3319 63RD AVE N $232.73 Cycle 5 1011821130008 0069800008 RESIDENT 3328 49TH AVE N $726.66 Cycle 6 1011821130009 0069790001 CORY CLARK 3334 49TH AVE N $384.90 Cycle 6 1011821130019 0069130000 ISSAC OBI 3349 49TH AVE N $287.77 Cycle 6 3411921130012 0031190006 SOLOMON FRANKSAWARI 3400 66TH AVE N $149.72 Cycle 1011821120056 0064060004 TWIN LAKES MANOR 3403 53RD AVE N $1,544.29 Cycle 6 1011821120056 0064070003 TWIN LAKES MANOR 3409 53RD AVE N $2,222.48 Cycle 6 3411921430026 0035950004 JOE PETRIE 3412 62ND AVE N $667.36 Cycle 5 1011821130032 0068310009 NICHOLAS RAMNARACE 3416 50TH AVE N $252.49 Cycle 6 1011821120057 0064030007 TWIN LAKES MANOR 342153RD AVE N $3,326.89 Cycle 6 1011821120057 0064010009 TWIN LAKES MANOR 3429 53RD AVE N $2,021.65 Cycle 6 1011821120057 0064000000 TWIN LAKES MANOR 3433 53RD AVE N $2,047.32 Cycle 6 3411921130016 0030990000 RESIDENT 3500 66TH AVE N $132.92 Cycle 3 3411921130017 0030730000 DONALD EKBERG 3508 66TH AVE N $670.21 Cycle 3 2711921420048 0011880000 KIMBERLY HOLLIE 3513 WOODBINE LA $779.80 Cycle 1 3411921120002 0008130005 MOUND CEMETERY 3515 69TH AVE N $218.47 Cycle 1 2711921420082 0011340005 CHARLES R LINDBERG 3519 72ND AVE N $753.48. Cycle 1 0311821130044 0044460003 JEROME MOOT 3600 ADMIRAL LA $719.91 Cycle 5 0311821430058 0046640008 MARY ST CLAIR 3606 53RD AVE N $818.82 Cycle 5 0311821130048 0044140001 LAURA A JACKSON 3613 ADMIRAL LA $288.81 Cycle 5 2711921420122 0011080007 ERICK EDSTROM 3616 VIOLET AVE $743.11 Cycle 1 0311821430060 0046620000 STEPHEN REICHEL 3618 53RD AVE N $461.90 Cycle 5 0311821130060 0044100005 SUSAN MIELKE 3633 ADMIRAL LA $677.17 Cycle 5 3411921130024 0030560001 JOHN OCONNOR 3700 66TH AVE N $600.12 Cycle 3 3411921130027 0030440006 VICTOR OGUNBANWO 370166TH AVE N $621.48 Cycle 3 2711921420089 0011270004 KHAMPHA CHANTHAVONG 3707 72ND AVE N $217.46 Cycle 1 3411921130025 0030550002 FLEMING INVESTMENTS 3708 66TH AVE N $113.70 Cycle 3 2711921420057 0011790001 AYUB K GENEMO 3713 WOODBINE LA $707.27 Cycle 1 2711921420099 0011170006 DAVE KRAUSE 3724 VIOLET AVE $730.93 Cycle 1 0311821310071 0045400008 DEAN MORGAN 3800 ECKBERG DR $696,74 Cycle 5 1011821210009 0065350008, ANN SOUTHARD 380153RD AVE N $698.94 Cycle 6 0311821210001 0042160001 CHARLES SKAIFE 3801 COMMODORE DR $506.10 Cycle 5 2711921420059 0011770003 CHRISSANDA THOMAS 3801 WOODBINE LA $341.00 Cycle 1 2711921420063 0011720008 GLADYS PERISIAN 3806 72ND AVE N $118.91 Cycle 1 0311821310055 0045240008 MARTY LAN'DSEM 3807 56TH AVE N $703.10 Cycle 5 3411921340073 0027210008 LINUS MOUA 3807 62ND AVE N $628.10 Cycle 3 2711921430063 0009820000 RESIDENT 3813 URBAN AVE $644.27 Cycle 1 1011821210071 0067200003 TODD HAVISTO 3815 OAK ST $266.16 Cycle 6 0311821210105 0026780001 SHERMAN KHO 3818 61ST AVE N $648.61 Cycle 3 0311821210027 0041480004 DEB SMITH 3818 COMMODORE DR $611.59 Cycle 5 1011821210060 0067290004 PROSPEROUS PROPERTY INC 3834 OAK ST $268.69 Cycle 6 3411921340014 0027160005 VERNA MUNN 3900 JANET LA $343.22 Cycle 3 1011821210052 0067400009 LYNN DORMOND 390152ND AVE N $520.17 Cycle 6 3411921340071 0027230006 TAMMY LENOIR 390162ND AVE N $670.61 Cycle 3 0311821310041 0045100004 EDWIN NGANG 3901 BURQUEST LA $176.21 Cycle 5 0311821310078 0045470001 MEGHAN GLYNN 3901 ECKBERG DR $161.69 Cycle 5 0311821240046 0044820008 LISA BROSE 3901 FRANCE PL $307.37 Cycle 5 3411921340031 0026890008 SAYKEO SAYARATH 3901 JANET LA $557.45 Cycle 3 0311821310047 0045160008 DAWN TREBBY 3906 56TH AVE N _ $691.10 Cycle 5 3411921340013 0027150006 EVAN ANDERSON 3906 JANET LA $416.83 Cycle 3 0311821310025 0044940004 KEVIN HERMANSON 3915 57TH AVE N $176.98 Cycle 5 3411921340105 0027600000 KPOLUNWON DAHN 4001 JOYCE LA $467.76 Cycle 3 0311821240014 0048160005 FRANCESCA MORRIS 4007 58TH AVE N $160.37 Cycle 5 3411921340049 0027450000 NICHOLAS SCHAFER 4012 62ND AVE N $661.64 Cycle 3 1011821320002 0060860001 DANIEL DUFOUR 4100 LAKESIDE AVE $153.32 Cycle 6 2711921310080 0013460009 0 09 DAN OCONNELL 4106 WOODBINE LA 708.84 Cycle$ cle 1 v 3411921340036 0026680003 CHRISTINA DUONG 4112 61ST AVE N $325.35 Cycle 3 2711921310082 0016060004 SHAKENA AVERY 4118 WOODBINE LA $165.65 Cycle 1 3611921120021 0056390003 KEITH BIROSH 420 67TH AVE N $706.16 Cycle 2 1011821320052 0060640007 MICHAEL LATTERY 4200 LAKEBREEZE AVE $450.71 Cycle 6 0311821210120 0043370005 KATHLEEN TULLY 420161ST AVE N $666.38 Cycle 5 3411921340115 0028020000 IDOWU KOTILA 420163RD AVE N $401.04 Cycle 3 2711921310102 0015840000 THOMAS ALBERICO 4201 WOODBINE LA $146.85 Cycle 1 3411921340043 0027390008 TSERING SAMDUP 4206 62ND AVE N $667.17 Cycle 3 3411921240049 0028740003 JENNIFER GARDNER 4206 65TH AVE N $425.48 Cycle 3 3411921340003 0027050008 LAWRENCE E THOMAS 4206 JANET LA $160.52 Cycle 3 3411921340114 0028030009 ALEXANDER TOPAH 4207 63RD AVE N $405.96 Cycle 3 3411921340042 0027380009 LORNA FORTUNE 4212 62ND AVE N $74.86 Cycle 3 3411921240048 0028750002 KARLI HAMMES 4212 65TH AVE N $702.70 Cycle 3 1011821320063 0060480008 EKAH ITA 4216 LAKEBREEZE AVE $348.83 Cycle 6 3411921340040 0026640007 JOHNSON OGBORU 4218 61ST AVE N $688.79 Cycle 3 3411921240030 0029780008 CHRIS SCHULTZ 4224 66TH AVE N $262.57 Cycle 3 3411921230065 0028780009 RESIDENT 4306 65TH AVE N $156.92 Cycle 3 3411921230046 0029400003 AUDREY HALSTEAD 4400 WINCHESTER LA $627.80 Cycle 3 3411921320108 0025680004 OMAR SANNEH 440165TH AVE N $737.22 Cycle 3 2711921320124 0013790009 MARCEL GAGNON 4407 71ST AVE N $843.28 Cycle 1 2711921320062 0014980005 KEN HUISINGA 4413 71ST AVE N $576.17 Cycle 1 3411921230057 0029150004 ELIZABETH WUOLLET 4413 WINCHESTER LA $149.72 Cycle 3 3411921230082 0028850000 KIA THAO 4500 65TH AVE N $472.36 Cycle 3 3411921230033 0029440009 JAMES VISETSIN 4506 WINCHESTER LA $460.58 Cycle 3 2711921320059 0014950008 ROGER ZIERKE 4507 71ST AVE N $777.34 Cycle 1 3411921230026 0029510009 SHERMISIA MAJOR 4619 66TH AVE N $498.74 Cycle 3 3311921410030 0023330008 LYNIESHA COLLINS 4700 63RD AVE N $154.52 Cycle 3 1011821320012 0060570006 NANCY WILCOX 4705 LAKEVIEW AVE $360.93 Cycle 6 3311921410029 0023340007 MORTON J COBB 4706 63RD AVE N $506.52 Cycle 3 2811921410140 0014780009 SPECIALTY CONTRACTING SERV 4706 WINGARD LA $671.73 Cycle 1 2811921410019 0004170104 JENNIFER IVERSON 4801 WINGARD PL $674.00 Cycle 1 2811921410016 0004170401 ABDULAHI MOHAMED 4807 WINGARD PL $619.38 Cycle 1 1011821320202 0060410005 GLOBAL CONST& INVST CO INC 4821 TWIN LAKE AVE $592.31 Cycle 6 1011821410020 0069370101 MBC II LLC 4821 XERXES AVE N $3,588.60 Cycle 6 1011821320203 0060510006 GLOBAL CONST& INVST CO INC 4823 TWIN LAKE AVE $515.96 Cycle 6 1011821130069 0063900101 PET HOSPITAL 4902 FRANCE AVE N $6,698.48 Cycle 6 1011821140019 0069380001 GLASSER FAMILY LIVING TRUST 4903 BROOKLYN BLVD $166.52 Cycle 6 3311921140036 0020420000 JEANNE THEIS 4906 65TH AVE N $541.74 Cycle 3 3311921140050 0019150006 FONG XIONG 4906 HOWE LA $314.41 Cycle 3 1011821130022 0069100003 RANDY J LAN HART 4907 BEARD AVE N $687.45 Cycle 6 2811921410032 0004200208 JOHN POHTILLA 4907 WINGARD PL $638.08 Cycle 1 1011821140018 0069390000 BRIAN VAN HAVERMAET 4911 BROOKLYN BLVD $601.82 Cycle 6 1011821130072 0063920000 DOUGLAS METAL SPEC 4912 FRANCE AVE N $158.43 Cycle 6 1011821130072 0063930108 DOUGLAS METAL SPEC 4912 FRANCE AVE N $650.59 Cycle 6 1011821140023 0069510003 RICHARD CSARGO 4912 ZENITH AVE N $257.21 Cycle 6 3311921140058 0019280001 DARWIN L CRIMMINS 4913 HOWE LA $144.92 Cycle 3 3311921140024 0020470005 ANDRE FISHER 4913 WINCHESTER LA $224.33 Cycle 3 1011821130072 0063930009 DOUGLAS METAL SPEC 4914 FRANCE AVE N $117.36 Cycle 6 1011821140016 0069410006 RHONDA MOSTROM 4929 BROOKLYN BLVD $508.09 Cycle 6 1011821140012 0069430004 RUSTY SMITH 4937 BROOKLYN BLVD $618.96 Cycle 6 3311921410085 0020690008 VICTORIA KROOK 5006 63RD AVE N $327.10 Cycle 3 1011821140083 0068920005 WARD S MONROE 5006 ABBOTT AVE N $742.43 Cycle 6 3311921410104 0021650001 JOHN WETTERHAHN 5067 65TH AVE N $663.18 Cycle 3 2811921410056- 0004250104 TAMRAJ ELKINS 5007 WINGARD PL $325.40 Cycle 1 1011821130030 0068340006 CECELIA SEWARD 5012 LILAC DR N $1,167.25 Cycle 6 1011821130050 0064510008 DAN DEUTSCH 5013 DREW AVE N $526.17 Cycle 6 3311921140066 0019640006 KELLY BACHOFER 5016 66TH AVE N $331.94 Cycle 3 1011821140069 0068760005 DELORES RILEY 5017 BROOKLYN BLVD $455.88 Cycle 6 2811921430023 0005940000 LORI WHEATON 5024 71ST AVE N $1,232.04 Cycle 1 1011821140066 0068380002 STEVE MASLOWSKI 5036 LILAC DR N $143.72 Cycle 6 1011821120078 0065160001 SUSAN MCKELVEY 5048 FRANCE AVE N $676.81 . Cycle 6 1011821120077 0064990002 RAY GLASSER 5049 EWING AVE N $296.05 Cycle 6 1011821120055 0064140004 LORRAINE SETHER 5100 DREW AVE N $98.79 Cycle 6 3311921140056 0019090004 RENEE G KOJETIN 5100 HOWE LA $244.90 Cycle 3 3311921430001 0017840004 ASHAKI GRANT 510163RD AVE N $655.77 Cycle 3 3311921140019 0019730005 RANDY THOMAS 510166TH AVE N $330.37 Cycle 3 1011821210069 0067230000 BRETT MYHRE 5101 FRANCE AVE N $138.92 Cycle 6 2811921430032 0006030009 ROBERTO CASTRUITA 5106 70TH AVE N $769.15 Cycle 1 3311921420005 0020760009 JOHN HOOK 5113 ELEANOR LA $152.80 Cycle 3 3311921130082 0019350002 HEIDI VANDERVELDEN 5113 HOWE LA $542.91 Cycle 3 1011821120040 0064630004 THERESA GASMAN 5116 EWING AVE N $652.16 Cycle 6 1011821210057 0067330008 MAUREEN WARD 5120 TWIN LAKE BLVD E $170.42 Cycle 6 3311921130053 0020320002 JOSEPH OKRAKENE 5124 65TH AVE N $807.06 Cycle 3 3311921130060 0019050008 CHARLES E TURNER 5124 HOWE LA $702.33 Cycle 3 3311921130004 0019770001 JOSEPHINE BASSAR 5125 66TH AVE N $82.09 Cycle 3 1011821120073 0064950006 WILLIAM KRIER 5125 EWING AVE N $153.32 Cycle 6 3311921130084 0019370000 KAWANNA HOWE 5125 HOWE LA $144.92 Cycle 3 1011821210004 0065740000 CHRISTOPHER FEALY 5127 TWIN LAKE BLVD E $228.30 Cycle 6 3311921130085 0019380009 STEVEN THAO 5131 HOWE LA $562.90 Cycle 3 1011821120071 0064930008 JEWEL BARSALOUX 5137 EWING AVE N $173.34 Cycle 6 3611921430033 0093830000 TOUSSAINT CHEATOM 515 62ND AVE N $507.17 Cycle 4 1011821110023 0070070054 TREMAYNE WILLIAMS 5201 XERXES AVE N $130.12 Cycle 6 1011821210043 0065730001 ANTHONY ENGER 5205 TWIN LAKE BLVD E $192.13 Cycle 6 1011821120010 0064230003 LYDIA JERNIGAN 5206 DREW AVE N $322.73 Cycle 6 1011821120022 0064720003 WENDY BRIERLEY 5206 EWING AVE N $287.77 Cycle 6 3311921420038 0021370006 CHISTOPHER TURAN 5206 PAUL DR $160.52 Cycle 3 3311921420107 0022090009 TAM PHAM 5207 ELEANOR LA $259.66 Cycle 3 2811921430037 0006280000 YOUNG THAO 5212 70TH AVE N $261.22 Cycle 1 • • 0 3311921130008 0019810005 BRIAN MADDEN 5213 66TH AVE N $430.89 Cycle 3 3311921430061 0017370002 THOMAS DAHLSTROM 5213 BOULDER LA $277.99 Cycle 3 1011821120009 0064240002 GRADY LONG 5214 DREW AVE N $93.30 Cycle 6 3311921420033 0021550003 KARIE PAGE-HOLDEN 5219 65TH AVE N . $144.92 Cycle 3 1011821120060 0064870006 TISHAURA HOSKINS 5219 EWING AVE N $273.85 Cycle 6 1011821120008 0064250001 JEFF WOMELDORF 5220 DREW AVE N $276.41 Cycle 6 1011821120059 0064860007 JEFF STEPP 5225 EWING AVE N $148.52 Cycle 6 3311921130090 0019430002 TOM YANG 5225 HOWE LA $158.12 Cycle 3 3311921130091 0019440001 CHOU YANG 5231 HOWE LA $685.42 Cycle 3 1011821120015 0064320002 SOUPHAPHONE STEWART 5233 DREW AVE N $845.76 Cycle 6 1011821210022 0065500008 JAMES COTTINGHAM 5244 GREAT VIEW AVE $579.36 Cycle 6 1011821210033 0065640002 BRIAN SOMKHAN 5256 TWIN LAKE BLVD E $676.76 Cycle 6 2811921430095 0006384703 MYRNA HUBERT 5300 70TH CIR $559.00 Cycle 1 3311921430054 0017450002 TROY MACON 5300 BOULDER LA $352.87 Cycle 3 3311921130017 0019900004 JASON FLETCHER 5300 WINCHESTER LA $141.32 Cycle 3 0111821340087 0083720000 EDWARD J WEBER 5301 COLFAX AVE N $563.22 Cycle 6 0211821440032 0074320000 5301 HUMBOLDT AVE N NORTH LLC 5301 HUMBOLDT AVE N $82.00 Cycle 6 0211821430040 0072870006 CHRISSIE CARVER 5301 LOGAN AVE N $639.00 Cycle 6 0111821330125 0084530002 GREGORY A TOROK 5302 FREMONT AVE N $572.32 Cycle 6 0111821340078 0083310000 SHERITTA SCROGGINS 5305 BRYANT AVE N $665.48 Cycle 6 3311921130069 0018960009 DEREK PRZYBYLA 5306 HOWE LA $411.57 Cycle 3 0211821430028 0072310003 LAWRENCE HECK 5306 OLIVER AVE N $669.78 Cycle 6 0211821430021 0072340000 LARRY COX 5307 NEWTON AVE N $166.58 Cycle 6 0211821340043 0071200007 CANDY SUNDSTROM 5307 PENN AVE N $557.76 Cycle 6 0311821440016 0046950001 DOUG CLIFTON 5309 BROOKLYN BLVD $645.68 Cycle 5 3311921120036 0000500007 RODNEY LYLE 5312 67TH AVE N $753.04 Cycle 1 0211821430027 0072300004 DANA SCHROEDER 5312 OLIVER AVE N $401.39 Cycle 6 3311921120050 0000600005 YANG VANG 5313 67TH AVE N $674.90 Cycle 1 2811921430092 0006384406 SAMUEL CLARK 5313 70TH CIR $531.41 Cycle 1 2811921430170 0006392003 FELICIA CEBALLOS 5314 71ST CIR $334.83 Cycle 1 0211821440073 0073210004 RYAN COOK 5316 LOGAN AVE N $543.00 - Cycle 6 3311921120056 0000350007 DESIREE WILKERSON 5318 68TH AVE N $816.67 Cycle 1 2811921430098 0006385007 RUSSELL L WHITTEMORE 5318 70TH CIR $532.40 Cycle 1 3311921420079 0021880004 BEVERLY KILLEBREW 5318 ELEANOR LA $684.06 Cycle 3 • • • 0211821340061 0071460007 STEVE HEINZ 5318 QUEEN AVE N $239.36 Cycle 6 0111821340076 0083360005 DEREK HOLMLUND 5320 COLFAX AVE N $591.86 Cycle 6 0211821440052 0073920008 JEFF HUDSON 5320 JAMES AVE N $166.77 Cycle 6 2811921430164 0006391401 TYRONE GERLOFF 532171ST CIR $726.17 Cycle 1 0211821440064 0073550003 MIKE JONES 5322 KNOX AVE N $417.87 Cycle 6 0111821430065 0082400000 SCOTT FOSTER 5323 4TH ST N $148.52 Cycle 6 0211821330016 0070840001 DONN BURSETH 5324 LILAC DR N $650.86 Cycle 6 0111821340010 0082770006 ROSE TABARA 5325 CAMDEN AVE N $106.03 Cycle 6 3311921420113 0022030005 NOELLE BRANDNER 5325 ELEANOR LA $283.21 Cycle 3 0111821330028 0085300009 MICHAELJOHNSTON 5326 HUMBOLDTAVE N $621.18 Cycle 6 2811921420057 0006396103 KATHRYN WORRE 5329 72ND CIR $650.94 Cycle 1 3311921430080 0017290002 DEKETA EVANS 5330 62ND AVE N $299.42 Cycle 3 0211821430010 0072490003 REAL ASSETS LLC 5330 NEWTON AVE N $159.32 Cycle 6 3311921430088 0017520002 STACY CARLSON 533163RD AVE N $363.73 Cycle 3 2811921430162 0006391203 ANNIE DELIS TIDWELL-JORDAN 5333 71ST CIR $636.75 Cycle 1 0111821330139 0084030003 THOMAS SPENCER 5333 DUPONT AVE N $566.69 Cycle 6 0111821330022 0085200001 ALISON WALK 5333 GIRARD AVE N $707.95 Cycle 6 0111821330161 0084450003 STEPHEN JARNOT 5335 EMERSON AVE N $693.51 Cycle 6 0211821330013 0070870008 JOWHARAH HARRIS-REID 5336 LILAC DR N $630.44 Cycle 6 0111821330023 0085190004 JOSEPH GROVES 5337 GIRARD AVE N $595.44 Cycle 6 0211821440101 0073520006 TIMOTHY D WALKER 5338 KNOX AVE N $280.09 Cycle 6 2811921430161 0006391104 ANNETTER REYNOLDS 5339 71ST CIR $149.81 Cycle 1 0211821440004 0073320001 BARBARA J RETIC 5343 KNOX AVE N $229.59 Cycle 6 0111821430083 0082560001 RITA A GASMAN 5344 CAMDEN AVE N $272.65 Cycle 6 0211821440097 0073680008 SCOTT VINCENT 5345 JAMES AVE N $1,028.88 Cycle 6 0211821430107 0072400002 LAURA RUPP 5345 NEWTON AVE N $700.30 Cycle 6 0311821430042 0046840004 SCOTT C HUGHES 5348 NORTHPORT DR $665.65 Cycle 5 0111821430082 0082570000 DEREK EMERY. 5350 CAMDEN AVE N $331.55 Cycle 6 0111821430061 0082350007 HELENA YEAH 53514TH ST N $820.58 Cycle 6 0211821440104 0074050003 GWEN CHRISTENSEN 5351 IRVING AVE N $124.05 Cycle 6 0311821440012 0047000103 DEBBORAH L DUNCAN 5353 BROOKLYN BLVD $654.87 Cycle 5 0111821430084 0082580009 ERIC KOTWITZ 5400 CAMDEN AVE N $677.02 Cycle 6 0211821340032 0071420001 JAMES KIEHL 5400 QUEEN AVE N $517.72 Cycle 6 3311921430081 0017000005 JOHN SCHWARZ 540163RD AVE N $1,256.22 Cycle 3 0 • • 0211821440093 0073700004 MICHELLE DYMOND 5401 JAMES AVE N $631.79 Cycle 6 0211821340035 0071510009 GREGORYJONES 5401 QUEEN AVE N $542.12 Cycle 6 0111821340103 0083610003 CAROLYN CARSON 5403 COLFAX AVE N $260.65 Cycle 6 0111821330044 0084990008 JENNIFER OSTERBAUER 5404 GIRARD AVE N $140.12 Cycle 6 0111821340057 0083220001 JACOB NEWTON 5405 BRYANT AVE N $549.87 Cycle 6 0111821330062 0085160007 BRIANNA HUNTER 5405 GIRARD AVE N $182.42 Cycle 6 0111821340061 0083440005 CINDY GRANQUIST 5406 COLFAX AVE N $620.11 Cycle 6 0211821440091 0073840008 LYNDON D HOLTE 5406 JAMES AVE N $643.05 Cycle 6 0311821440010 0047020002 JOEL ANDERSON 5407 BROOKLYN BLVD $464.82 Cycle 5 0211821440088 0074070001 MARK GONZALES 5407 IRVING AVE N $594.43 Cycle 6 0111821340106 0083860004 PETER BERGLUND 5408 DUPONT AVE N $658.54 Cycle 6 0111821330047 0085020003 BRETT STRUCK 5410 GIRARD AVE N $257.89 Cycle 6 0111821340059 0083460003 STEVEN SWANSON 5412 COLFAX AVE N $628.11 Cycle 6 0211821440026 0073110006 SERGIO CHAVEZ 5412 LOGAN AVE N $179.42 Cycle 6 0211821440140 0074080000 CHRISTINE HENSLEY 5413 IRVING AVE N $146.12 Cycle 6 0211821440015 0073470004 DAVID HUSET 5414 KNOX AVE N $208.09 Cycle 6 0211821430084 0072720003 RON MARTIN 5418 MORGAN AVE N $164.09 Cycle 6 0111821430058 0082320000 SHARMARKE AHMED 54214TH ST N $148.65 Cycle 6 0111821330066 0085360003 RAVEN DEFILIPPO 5422 HUMBOLDT AVE N $691.54 Cycle 6 0111821330086 0084250007 TOMMY MUNSON 5424 EMERSON AVE N $261.13 Cycle 6 0311821440036 0047670103 KFC/A&W 5430 BROOKLYN BLVD $120.99 Cycle 5 0111821430054 0082620003 GRACE EDWARDSON 5430 CAMDEN AVE N $292.73 Cycle 6 0211821430082 0072700005 SHERRICE MAYBELL-FRAZIER 5430 MORGAN AVE N $139.08 Cycle 6 0211821440128 0073750009 LAMIN JARJU 5431 JAMES AVE N $230.00 Cycle 6 0211821430081 0073030006 ANDREA TIERNEY 5431 LOGAN AVE N $629.99 Cycle 6 0111821430056 0082300002 BELEN MARTINEZ-ORTIZ 5433 4TH ST N $646.18 Cycle 6 0111821330094 0084340006 DUANE ENNINGA 5435 EMERSON AVE N $617.17 Cycle 6 0211821440079 0074150001 ANGELA SHONOIKI 5436 IRVING AVE N $224.71 Cycle 6 0211821440121 0073790005 SARAH COLLANDER 5436 JAMES AVE N $454.33 Cycle 6 0211821440030 0073070002 SHANE MCLEAN 5436 LOGAN AVE N $153.74 Cycle 6 0211821440082 0074120004 TOU THOR 5437 IRVING AVE N $137.72 Cycle 6 0111821340109 0083880002 HOUMPHENG BOUNSAVATH 5438 DUPONT AVE N $526.43 Cycle 6 0111821430091 0082290005 JOSHUA LUNGSTROM 54414TH ST N $159.00 Cycle 6 0111821340126 0083170008 AMAD ZALLOUM 5441 BRYANT AVE N $593.23 Cycle 6 0 • • 0111821330076 0083940004 DANIEL ODOLE 5441 DUPONT AVE N $384.24 Cycle 6 0211821440081 0074130003 RYNETTA DEAN 5443 IRVING AVE N $360.66 Cycle 6 0211821430079 0073050004 DANIEL ZEILERMEIR 5443 LOGAN AVE N $134.12 Cycle 6 0111821340049 0083160009 ANNE WALASZEK 5447 BRYANT AVE N $220.58 Cycle 6 0111821330075 0083930005 HELEN EVANS 5447 DUPONT AVE N $677.51 Cycle 6 0111821330093 0084330007 GERALD W KAMROW 5447 EMERSON AVE N $607.53 Cycle 6 0111821330109 0084710000 BENJAMIN HAWKINS 5452 FREMONT AVE N $675.18 Cycle 6 0111821430052 0082270007 WILLIAM D WENSEL 5453 4TH ST N $277.30 Cycle 6 0111821310061 0080600007 N AND G PROPERTIES LLC 5500 BRYANT AVE N $1,912.93 Cycle 6 0111821310075 0080010009 TIANDRA ROBINSON 5501 COLFAX AVE N $944.36 Cycle 6 0111821320098 0079300007 SARAH KENDEMA 5504 FREMONT AVE N $528.46 Cycle 6 0111821320101 0079290000 DAN HEIN 5508 FREMONT AVE N $428.09 Cycle 6 0111821320058 0077660006 KHAMPHOUI INTHONEPRADITH 5509 GIRARD AVE N $110.52 Cycle 6 0211821420013 0075740008 JILL VARHOL 5509 LOGAN AVE N $82.00 Cycle 6 0111821320097 0079340003 BRUCE WHITTAKER 5511 EMERSON AVE N $743.99 Cycle 6 0311821340024 0045860003 DAVID SITLER 5513 FRANCE AVE N $682.70 Cycle 5 0211821410110 0075380003 BARBARA MCLAUGHLIN 5516 KNOX AVE N $634.98 Cycle 6 0211821420088 0077010004 KATHRYN ENDICOTT 5518 JUDY LA $417.40 Cycle 6 0211821410024 0074750008 NHIA SHOVA YANG 5524 IRVING AVE N $229.27 Cycle 6 0111821310072 0080040006 ANDREW REINERT 5525 COLFAX AVE N $1,939.84 Cycle 6 0211821410104 0075120003 MICHAEL MUNSON 5525 JAMES AVE N $275.89 Cycle 6 0211821410002 0074530004 RESIDENT 5527 HUMBOLDT AVE N $397.66 Cycle 6 0111821320088 0079650005 ALLAN APPLEBEE 5530 EMERSON AVE N $513.88 Cycle 6 0211821410023 0074740009 MARTIN GIL-SANDOVAL 5530 IRVING AVE N $560.97 Cycle 6 0211821410096 0075680006 IGOR KOVALSKY 5532 LOGAN AVE N $71.50 Cycle 6 0211821410030 0074860005 FRANK HENRY 5533 IRVING AVE N $403.89 Cycle 6 0111821320035 0077930003 ROBBI LEMKE 5538 GIRARD AVE N $334.95 Cycle 6 0111821310081 0079950009 LOLA I NELSEN 5540 DUPONT AVE N $629.07 Cycle 6 0211821410021 0074720001 MORRIS DAVIES 5542 IRVING AVE N $239.36 Cycle 6 0211821310014 0077430004 LAMIN BOJANG 5542 LILAC DR N $153.32 Cycle 6 0111821320075 0077720206 LUMARIE OROZCO 5547 GIRARD AVE N $616.61 Cycle 6 0111821320037 0077910005 BERISSO BEKUTO 5548 GIRARD AVE N $250.32 Cycle 6 0211821310013 0077420005 MARGARET ZELEE 5548 LILAC DR N $604.86 Cycle 6 0211821420021 0076200002 RICK NESTEBY 5548 MORGAN AVE N $594.34 Cycle 6 • • 0 0311821420018 0046130109 MARY ANN SNOW 5549 BROOKLYN BLVD $629.06 Cycles 0111821310123 0080740001 MELISSA FITZGIBBONS 5556 ALDRICH DR N $327.42 Cycle 6 0111821310092 0080540005 JANE ACREE 5600 BRYANT AVE N $568.52 Cycle,6 0211821410020 0074710002 WILLIAM BAILEY 5600 IRVING AVE N $445.97 Cycle 6 0311821310003 0047750004 GENE KOHLER 5601 HALIFAX AVE N $143.21 Cycles 0211821410059 0075170008 BERNADETTE ANDERSON 5603 JAMES AVE N $772.94 Cycle 6 0211821410006 0074580009 MICHAEL WOLF 5605 HUMBOLDT AVE N $470.04 Cycle 6 0111821310113 0080950006 YADETA MOUSSA 5606 ALDRICH AVE N $614.74 Cycle 6 0111821310028 0080100008 DAVE RUMPLE 5607 COLFAX AVE N $682.04 Cycle 6 0111821320068 0077540000 JOHN D HANSON 5610 HUMBOLDT AVE N $243.05 Cycle 6 0311821310009 0048040009 MICHELE KLEIN 5611 INDIANA AVE N $520.02 Cycle 5 0211821310010 0077390000 ESTHER KAMARA 5612 LILAC DR N $132.92 Cycle 6 0111821310027 0080110007 KATHLEEN HUNTER 5615 COLFAX AVE N $659.93 Cycle 6 0111821320023 0079080005 LISA YANKTON 5615 FREMONT AVE N $204.66 Cycle 6 0311821310086 0047720007 DEB OLSON 5615 HALIFAX AVE N $773.30 Cycle 5 0111821320004 0079800006 JESSE SALAZAR 5625 DUPONT AVE N $731.17 Cycle 6 0111821320022 0079090004 AMINA DIOURY 5625 FREMONT AVE N $620.24 Cycle 6 0211821410079 0075610003 CHRISTOPHER HAMMOND 5626 LOGAN AVE N $577.45 Cycle 6 0111821310096 0080500009 RESIDENT 5630 BRYANT AVE N $563.67 Cycle 6 0211821310007 0077360003 GARY FORD 5630 LILAC DR N $622.38 Cycle 6 0111821310037 0080430009 TAVIA ANDERSON 5631 BRYANT AVE N $848.96 Cycle 6 0211821310002 0077350004 DAVID MANTOOTH 5631 HILLSVIEW RD $123.93 Cycle 6 0211821420005 0075840006 FRANCISCO CAJINA 5633 LOGAN AVE N $170.42 Cycle 6 0111821320002 0079830003 ANDREA LARSEN 5641 DUPONT AVE N $569.30 Cycle 6 0111821320017 0079540008 LECESTER GLOVER 5642 EMERSON AVE N $701.38 Cycle 6 0111821310098 0080480004 REGLA MARTINEZ 5646 BRYANT AVE N $147.32 Cycle 6 0111821320043 0077860002 DARYL GRAVES 5646 GIRARD AVE N $616.64 Cycle 6 0111821320001 0079840002 JULIO C SEGURA 5651 DUPONT AVE N $488.21 Cycle 6 0211821410053 0075230000 JENNIFER DILLON-JONES 5651 JAMES AVE N $659.54 Cycle 6 0311821420017 0047210009 ROBERT BATTA 5655 BROOKLYN BLVD $675.74 Cycle 5 0211821410068 0075560000 RORY MYSLIWIEC 5659 KNOX AVE N $566.10 Cycle 6 0111821240062 0091760001 JANET JOHNSON 5700 BRYANT AVE N $711.45 Cycle 4 0111821130045 0094290006 TRUE FOUNDATION 5700 CAMDEN AVE N $438.23 Cycle 4 0111821240060 0091680001 CYNTHIA ANN MOORE 5701 BRYANT AVE N $169.25 Cycle 4 • • 0311821240007 0048100001 MICHAEL F ONEILL 5701 HALIFAX AVE N $780.70 Cycle 5 0111821240106 0094300003 WILLIAM R FULLER 5705 CAMDEN AVE N $800.47 Cycle 4 0111821240063 0091770000 KOCON LLC 5712 BRYANT AVE N $163.01 Cycle 4 0111821230016 0088220001 EDYTHE G POTTER 5712 GIRARD AVE N $703.31 Cycle 4 0111821230023 0089950002 THURMAN V FOSTER 5715 DUPONT AVE N $73.10 Cycle 4 0211821140107 0086350008 ALFREDA WATTS 5716 LOGAN AVE N $259.77 Cycle 4 0311821130075 0044440005 JOSIAH ONSOMU 5718 DREW AVE N $924.29 Cycle 5 0111821230032 0089220000 SAMUEL OPARE-ADDO 5725 EMERSON AVE N $748.48 Cycle 4 0311821230004 0049560005 JUDY CABRAL 5727 MAJOR AVE N $785.56 Cycle 5 0111821240045 0091780009 RENAE SAUTER 5728 BRYANT AVE N $634.39 Cycle 4' 0211821140093 0087190007 DEXTER WILLIAMS 5728 IRVING AVE N $616.69 Cycle 4 0111821240046 0091650004 GLEN SANDE 5729 BRYANT AVE N $139.20 Cycle 4 0111821230034 0088460003 ORTENCIA RAMIREZ 5730 FREMONT AVE N $709.80 Cycle 4 0211821140039 0086630003 JEFFREY LEWIS 5732 KNOX AVE N $687.59 Cycle 4 0111821230035 0088470002 MICHAELJ DUFFY 5736 FREMONT AVE N $146.75 Cycle 4 0311821130071 0044500006 SHAWN M BROWN 5737 DREW AVE N $809.09 Cycle 5 0111821230088 0088360005 JACKIE PERRY 5737 GIRARD AVE N $587.46 Cycle 4 0211821140101 0086370006 LAURA SWINEHART 5740 LOGAN AVE N $318.70 Cycle 4 0111821240047 0091640005 BRANDON THENG 5741 BRYANT AVE N $263.33 Cycle 4 0111821230029 0089190005 RANDALLJOHNSON 5743 EMERSON AVE N $745.43 Cycle 4 0211821140100 0086370105 SAEED JIBRELL 5744 LOGAN AVE N $802.55 Cycle 4 0111821240043 0091810004 HAROLD J SCOTT 5750 BRYANT AVE N $403.66 Cycle 4 0111821240049 0091620007 JOHN E KELLEY 5759 BRYANT AVE N $718.85 Cycle 4 0111821240025 0090050008 AMOS GUAR 5800 DUPONT AVE N $764.29 Cycle 4 0211821140049 0086930007 YING LEE 5800 JAMES AVE N $102.77 Cycle 4 0311821230026 0049280208 ROBERT H FORD 5803 SHORES DR $389.23 Cycle 5 0311821230027 0049280307 SUSAN M JOHNSON 5805 SHORES DR $587.35 Cycle 5 0311821240113 0043610004 SARAH BOHRER 5806 JUNE AVE N $747.44 Cycle 5 0111821230096 0089890000 CORINNE TIFFANY 5807 DUPONT AVE N $753.50 Cycle 4 0111821230075 0089170007 CHEETARAH 5807 EMERSON AVE N $664.13 Cycle 4 0311821240103 0042860006 TIM DALY 5807 HALIFAX AVE N $741.18 Cycle 5 0211821140021 0086490002 DEAN DUNN 5807 KNOX AVE N $742.70 Cycle 4 0111821240026 0090060007 KIMBERLY LACHAPELLE 5808 DUPONT AVE N $750.40 Cycle 4 0111821230078 0088500006 THOMAS LYMAN 5808 FREMONT AVE N $542.02 Cycle 4 • • • 0311821130037 0042690007 CARLOS LEON 5815 EWING AVE N $664.40 Cycle 5 0211821140065 0087400000 CHESTER JULIN 5815 HUMBOLDT AVE N $614.14 Cycle 4 0111821240027 0090070006 TIMOTHY DEHN 5816 DUPONT AVE N $776.54 Cycle 4 0111821240022 0090760002 TROY DAVIS 5817 COLFAX AVE N $639.54 Cycle 4 0111821230045 0088090008 ABDI OSMAN 5819 FREMONT AVE N $471.14 Cycle 4 0111821230053 0088310000 LEE SCHABLIN 5819 GIRARD AVE N $428.09 Cycle 4 0211821140025 0086390004 BETH HOXTEL 5820 LOGAN AVE N $185.73 Cycle 4 0111821230105 0087620003 DOYINSOLA LAWAL 5826 HUMBOLDT AVE N $558.04 Cycle 4 0111821240088 0092550005 JOSH WALSTROM 5829 ALDRICH AVE N $160.37 Cycle 4 0111821230092 0089850004 CHOUA YANG 5831 DUPONT AVE N $492.88 Cycle 4 0311821230048 0049250300 JOANN GILBAUGH 5833 SHORES DR $721.90 Cycle 5 0111821240108 0092790007 PAUL SCULLY 5834 ALDRICH AVE N $399.41 Cycle 4 0211821230005 0039020002 LERNELL D JAMES 5836 WASHBURN AVE N $740.03 Cycle 5 0211821140098 0086730001 BILL ASHFORD 5837 JAMES AVE N $250.40 Cycle 4 0111821240030 0090100001 GRETCHEN GOODWIN 5840 DUPONT AVE N $560.28 Cycle 4 0311821140010 0039950000 MELISSA GREGERSEN 5841 ZENITH AVE N $551.11 Cycle 5 0311821240097 0042920008 ANDREA BOYLE 5843 HALIFAX AVE N $312.80 Cycle 5 0311821220029 0049210502 KEVIN SCHRAMMEN 5845 LAKE CURVE LA $186.03 Cycle 5 0111821240072 0092800004 PAUL SCULLY 5848 ALDRICH AVE N $421.51 Cycle 4 0111821240094 0091540007 KATHLEEN BRENNAN 5851 BRYANT AVE N $103.46 Cycle 4 0311821220033 0049230302 GEVONEE FORD 5851 LAKE CURVE LA $650.16 Cycle 5 0111821210119 0090920002 MATTHEW ST HILAIRE 5900 COLFAX AVE N $115.05 Cycle 4 0111821220009 0089350104 TYRONE LEE 5900 EMERSON AVE N $311.03 Cycle 4 0311821210081 0043540003 CODY MILLER 5900 JUNE AVE N $633.47 Cycle 5 0111821220008 0089830006 ANGEL GABRIEL AGUILAR GUERRERO 5901 DUPONT AVE N $711.02 Cycle 4 0211821220043 0038790001 JOYCE TEEKAYE 5901 VINCENT AVE N $835.54 Cycle 5 0311821110083 0039960009 PAMELA ARNESON 5901 ZENITH AVE N $700.55 Cycle 5 0111821220023 0089110003 PAO VANE 5903 EMERSON AVE N $644.80 Cycle 4 0111821210009 0093450007 RENEE LUNEMANN 5905 CAMDEN AVE N $657.12 Cycle 4 0311821120065 0042630003 LARRY E CARLSON 5905 EWING'AVE N $508.06 Cycle 5 0311821110100 0039650006 TIMOTHY JACKSON 5907 YORK AVE N $502.77 Cycle 5 0111821210059 0090150006 KRISTEN LINDQUIST 5912 DUPONT AVE N $727.77 Cycle 4 0311821210079 0043520005 MARK K JOHNSON 5912 JUNE AVE N $687.62 Cycle 5 0211821220028 0039240006 GABRIEL KROMAH 5912 XERXES AVE N $658.84 Cycle 5 0 • • 0211821220023 0039070007 ELMER FORTNEY 5913 WASHBURN AVE N $297.38 Cycle 5 0311821110117 0039340004 DEB TALATALA 5913 XERXES AVE N $977.57 Cycle 5 0311821120027 0040880006 BERNICE PENDY 5916 EWING AVE N $401.01 Cycle 5 0311821120099 0042830009 MAE GENEKPEIN 5918 ADMIRAL LA $745.11 Cycle 5 0211821220069 0038560008 PATRICIA HOLCOMB 5918 UPTON AVE N $700.36 Cycle 5 0311821210008 0042230002 GEBRETHADIK GETACHEW 5919 ADMIRAL LA $701.26 Cycle 5 0311821110071 0040510009 MOUNIRATOU SEGBAYA 5924 BEARD AVE N $645.41 Cycle 5 0111821220012 0089430005 JEREMY SPRINGER 5924 EMERSON AVE N $157.73 Cycle 4 0111821210033 0092450008 JAMES CARLSON 5927 ALDRICH AVE N $752.46 Cycle 4 0111821220005 0089800009 JUSTIN HOFSETH 5927 DUPONT AVE N $706.38 Cycle 4 0311821120051 0042490002 TOURIYA DIOURY-JENKE 5928 ADMIRAL LA $777.38 Cycle 5 0311821110125 0039540009 JOHN H STOKER 5930 YORK AVE N $63.81 Cycle 5 0311821110061 0040330002 DARRIN JOHNSON 5931 ABBOTT AVE N $472.27 Cycle 5 0311821210035 0041540005 FRANCISCO DURAN CORTES 5931 PEARSON DR $899.74 Cycle 5 0311821210035 0041540005 ALONDRA VASQUEZ 5931 PEARSON DR $108.56 Cycle 5 0211821220020 0039100002 LEE VANG 5931 WASHBURN AVE N $207.22 Cycle 5 0311821110078 0040010000 JUDITH NDUBISI 5931 ZENITH AVE N $801.62 Cycle 5 0311821210048 0041940007 BILL FORDER 5936 HALIFAX PL $103.17 Cycle 5 0311821210048 0041940007 JOSHUA WHITE 5936 HALIFAX PL $336.78 Cycle 5 0311821220020 0043780005 SOUNDRA SOMPHAENG 5937 JUNE AVE N $635.92 Cycle 5 0211821220037 0038850003 JACK JOHNSON 5937 VINCENT AVE N $286.35 Cycle 5 0211821210014 0008740004 GOLDEN TIGER COMPANY 5939 JOHN MARTIN DR $1,841.79 Cycle 4 0111821210031 0092430000 JAMES DALEY 5941 ALDRICH AVE N $430.80 Cycle 4 0111821120012 0094030006 TONY CARLSON 5945 LYNDALE AVE N $486.41 Cycle 4 031.1821110092 0040150004 LOR KOU 5948 ABBOTT AVE N $319.44 Cycle 5 0211821220017 0039130009 EVERRENE BONNICK 5949 WASHBURN AVE N $1,246.09 Cycle 5 0311821110111 0039400006 DIANE BARRICK 5949 XERXES AVE N $194.75 Cycle 5 0311821110093 0039720007 ANGEL MALONE 5949 YORK AVE N $174.09 Cycle 5 0111821220017 0089040002 MARTIN MCDONAL 5951 EMERSON AVE N $630.00 Cycle,4 3611921340001 0093040006 JEFF SMITH 600 62ND AVE N $576.87 Cycle 4 0111821210091 0092000001 LISA NOURIE 6000 BRYANT AVE N $387.52 Cycle 4 0111821220054 0088640000 ANTHONY MILLS 6000 FREMONT AVE N $153.77 Cycle 4 0311821210098 0043470003 COREY HESS 6000 JUNE AVE N $309.96 Cycle 5 0311821210057 0043050003 SUZANNE BUSS 6001 HALIFAX PL $703.45 Cycle 5 i • • 0111821120036 0093700005 DARNELL WILLIAMS 6006 CAMDEN AVE N $258.09 Cycle 4 0311821210056 0043060002 GILBERT SHANNON 6007 HALIFAX PL $527.82 Cycles 0111821210083 0092400003 KARI JIMENEZ 6009 ALDRICH AVE N $732.69 Cycle 4 0111821430106 0082860104 PHILLIP BERGLIN 601 BELLVUE LA $298.97 Cycle 6 0111821430106 0082860104 EQUITON HOLDINGS LLC 601 BELLVUE LA $95.36 Cycle 6 0111821210075 0092920000 KO LO 6012 ALDRICH AVE N $287.02 Cycle 4 0111821220040 0089500005 CARLA HARRIS 6012 EMERSON AVE N $146.48 Cycle 4 0311821210071 0043110005 TODD OKAN 6012 HALIFAX AVE N $311.48 Cycle 5 0111821210015 0090600000 HECTOR HERNANDEZ 6013 COLFAX AVE N $85.10 Cycle 4 0111821220051 0089010005 NICHOLAS SHOPEK 6013 EMERSON AVE N $723.96 Cycle 4 0111821220071 0087830008 MAURICE MCCARTER 6014 GIRARD AVE N $653.71 Cycle 4 0111821220066 0088020005 PATRICIA A PAYNE 6015 FREMONT AVE N $145.85 Cycle 4 0311821210072 0043100006 RICHARD GARDNER 6018 HALIFAX AVE N $117.59 Cycle 5 0311821220015 0043920007 SHIRLEE JOHANSON 6018 KYLE AVE N $309.06 Cycle 5 0111821210066 0093340000 INANG EFFIONG EKAH 6019 CAMDEN AVE N $605.99 Cycle 4 0311821220008 0043830008 JOHN NICKELL 6019 JUNE AVE N ` $682.45 Cycle 5 0311821210031 0041500009 ROBERTA OLSON 6019 PEARSON DR $746.29 Cycle 5 0111821210097 0091410003 GLENN KURKE 6021 BRYANT AVE N $465.55 Cycle 4 0111821220065 0088010006 TONG YANG 6021 FREMONT AVE N $176.21 Cycle 4 0111821220081 0087770006 BRAD ASHTON 6021 GIRARD AVE N $378.54 Cycle 4 0111821120031 0093970004 RENEE KLICK 6023 LYNDALE AVE N $778.78 Cycle 4 0111821210013 0090580004 JOSEPH PALM 6025 COLFAX AVE N $150.35 Cycle 4 0311821220007 0043840007 PATRICIA SEVERSON 6025 JUNE AVE N $441.65 Cycle 5 0111821220073 0087850006 RAY WARREN 6026 GIRARD AVE N $745.10 Cycle 4 0111821210087 0092040007 DIANA WHITAKER 6028 BRYANT AVE N $614.07 Cycle 4 0111821210094 0091400004 MAURICE ETA 6029 BRYANT AVE N $82.25 Cycle 4 0111821210124 0091080103 RUKAYAT OYEDELE-OLOGBONORI 6030 COLFAX AVE N $655.54 Cycle 4 0311821120015 0041090001 ROCKWELL INVESTMENTS LLC 6031 BROOKLYN BLVD $848.73 Cycle 5 0111821220074 0087860005 DUSTIN LEE 6032 GIRARD AVE N $742.86 Cycle 4 0111821210070 0092970005 JACK REED 6042 ALDRICH AVE N $168.39 Cycle 4 0111821210046 0090280001 KEAN STENBERG 6042 DUPONT AVE N $738.52 Cycle 4 0311821120085 0041140004 SEE XIONG 6042 EWING AVE N $611.52 Cycle 5 0111821210010 0090550007 JAMES C WHITE 6043 COLFAX AVE N $848.70 Cycle 4 01'11821220061 0087970002 JOHN RIEL 6045 FREMONT AVE N $164.74 Cycle 4 0111821130029 0094090000 SAM MUKHERJEE 605 59TH AVE N $742.57 Cycle 4 0111821220077 0087730000 MIKE MCILHERAN 6050 LILAC DR N $735.97 Cycle 4 3411921430047 0037980009 QUE VIET 6100 BROOKLYN BLVD $1,283.89 Cycle 5 3411921430050 0031950003 DOUA VANG 6101 BROOKLYN BLVD $214.19 Cycle 3 3611921330010 0087960003 ROMAN KAASA 6101 FREMONT AVE N $176.21 Cycle 4 3611921340023 0091100000 JOHN CUMMINGS 6106 COLFAX AVE N $900.00 Cycle 4 3611921340096 0092330002 MONICA SHOCKENCY 6107 ALDRICH AVE N $682.47 Cycle 4 3611921430023 0093890004 HONEY LOCKARD 6109 LYN DALE,AVE N $445.44 Cycle 4 3611921340012 0092090002 BILL KOLBE 6114 BRYANT AVE N $707.90 Cycle 4 3411921340017 0027190002 GABRIEL SAYEE 6121 FRANCE AVE N $893.46 Cycle 3 3611921340030 0090510001 LORETTA MAYSON-POJAH 6123 COLFAX AVE N $82.49 Cycle 4 3611921330029 0089600003 JOHN MORALES 6124 EMERSON AVE N $432.09 Cycle 4 3411921330099 0025400007 HOUA LEE 6124 LEE AVE N $553.08 Cycle 3 3611921430021 0093870006 KAREN HOLTER 6127 LYNDALE AVE N $556.43 Cycle 4 3611921340014 0092110008 KELLY KROGH 6130 BRYANT AVE N $526.24 Cycle 4 3611921340026 009113QO07 TRENT BOLDT 6130 COLFAX AVE N $386.64 Cycle 4 3311921430019 0017710009 PAUL A SAARI 6130 SCOTT AVE N $253.69 Cycle 3 3311921440058 0017940002 DEMARCUS BROWN 6136 REGENT AVE N $724.52 Cycle 3 3411921330032 0025930003 WILLIAM J SNYDER 6137 KYLE AVE N $132.92 Cycle 3 3311921430021 0017690003 ALVINA LOPEZ 6142 SCOTT AVE N $351.09 Cycle 3 3611921430036 0093180000 DON FETT 6200 CAMDEN AVE N $692.95 Cycle 4 3311921440017 0018180004 JACQUELINE BRAESCH 6200 QUAIL AVE N $285.86 Cycle 3 3411921430027 0037160008 MYRNA HJELLMING 6206 CHOWEN AVE N $110.43 Cycle 5 3411921430028 0037270005 HARRIET ISANKA 6207 CHOWEN AVE N $192.76 Cycle 5 3411921330051 0024260006 ROMEO GONO 6207 LEE AVE N $711.97 Cycle 3 3311921430024 0017660006 WILLIAM LORENTZ 6212 SCOTT AVE N $622.21 Cycle 3 3611921340045 0093050005 GERALDINE WILKIE 6215 CAMDEN AVE N $165.65 Cycle 4 3411921330065 0023790003 CHRISTOPHER HAGEN 6217 MAJOR AVE N $563.81 Cycle 3 3411921330060 0024000006 MICHAEL LUTZ 6218 MAJOR AVE N $160.52 Cycle 3 3311921440027 0018060008 OLUBUNMI OLABIYI 6219 QUAIL AVE N $717.05 Cycle 3 Y 3311921430010 0017800008 SCOTT ODEGAARD 6219 REGENT AVE N $113.23 Cycle 3 3611921340044 0093060004 ALFREDO HERNANDEZ 6221 CAMDEN AVE N $723.78 Cycle 4 3511921330052 0037790002 JOSIAH RASUGU 6223 BROOKLYN DR $160.37 Cycle 5 3411921330037 0025480009 CHRISTINE BROWN 6224 LEE AVE N $655.72 Cycle 3 3611921340049 0091270001 JUAN LOZANO 6225 BRYANT AVE N $692.67 Cycle 4 3611921340049 0091270001 RECIFE PROPERTIES INC 6225 BRYANT AVE N $775.96 Cycle 4 3411921340091 0027870009 JOSHUA KIDD 6225 FRANCE AVE N $779.30 Cycle 3 3411921330048 0024230009 TOM CRAMER 6225 LEE AVE N $142.52 Cycle 3 3511921330008 0035350007 ALYSSA WILSON 6228 BROOKLYN DR $772.23 Cycle 5 3411921330036 0025490008 JASON STANFORD 6230 LEE AVE N $734.66 Cycle 3 3411921340092 0027880008 GARY IVERSON 6231 FRANCE AVE N $121.74 Cycle 3 3611921340079 0092180001 LUIS QUINTUNA 6234 BRYANT AVE N $897.03 Cycle 4 3611921340061 0091220006 LOREN DEL CROWE 6234 LILAC DR N $157.73 Cycle 4 3411921430019 0037210001 KODJO 0 OYEGADE 6236 CHOWEN AVE N $60.18 Cycle 5 3411921330061 0023750007 JASON BLANSKI 6241 MAJOR AVE N $611.16 Cycle 3 3311921430002 0017610001 VICKI CHARLES 6242 SCOTT AVE N $610.27 Cycle 3 0111821130042 0093600007 LANETTE LAWVER 625 59TH AVE N $474.22 Cycle 4 3311921420116 0022210003 JOAN BOURASA 6300 UNITY AVE N $299.57 Cycle 3 3411921420007 0031820008 DONALD M BLOM 6301 BROOKLYN BLVD $516.52 Cycle 3 3411921310047 0028370009 JAMES HESTER 6301 INDIANA AVE N $712.19 Cycle 3 3411921420009 0031730009 PATTI LAUER 6306 FRANCE AVE N $592.30 Cycle 3 3411921310023 0031630001 KONG MOUA 6306 GRIMES AVE N $167.08 Cycle 3 3411921310099 0028390007 ROSALENE LEE 6306 INDIANA AVE N $128.00 Cycle 3 3411921320082 0025820006 CINDY WOODS 6307 KYLE AVE N $675.88 Cycle 3 3511921320085 0034080001 NICOLE STEWART 6309 BROOKLYN DR $757.30 Cycle 5 3411921410095 0033770008 DEBORAH GRAY 6312 BEARD AVE N $649.19 Cycle 5 3411921320081 0025810007 GILFORD SUNDEEN 6313 KYLE AVE N $138.92 Cycle 3 3311921410044 0022500007 WILLIAM A HILL 6313 ORCHARD AVE N $715.75 Cycle 3 3511921320052 0034350008 DENNIS SMALL 6319 BROOKLYN DR $678.97 Cycle 5 3311921410077 0020610006 ZOZANNE DIZAYEE 6319 PERRY AVE N $149.72 Cycle 3 3411921310096 0028420002 RESIDENT 6324 INDIANA AVE N $296:65 Cycle 3 3411921410034 0033160002 CHADROUTIE RAMDIN 6325 XERXES AVE N $858.51 Cycle 5 3311921420029 0021260009 BONNIE VARNESS 6327 REGENT AVE N $227.46 Cycle 3 3611921420020 0000930108 CROWN BRAWLEY LLC 6330 CAMDEN AVE N $2,359.27 Cycle 4 3411921320062 0026420004 ALAN MILLER 6331 JUNE AVE N $633.33 Cycle 3 3311921420071 0021800002 SUE XIONG 6331 SCOTT AVE N $309.13 Cycle 3 3311921410113 0021100007 MICHELLE MARES 6332 REGENT AVE N $635.26 Cycle 3 3311921420030 0021250000 TROY BAKER 6333 REGENT AVE N $698.09 Cycle 3 • 3311921410015 0022590008 ADAN C DOMINQUIZ 6336 ORCHARD AVE N $870.78 Cycle 3 3611921320002 0099750004 LUCAS CARPENTER 6337 DUPONT AVE N $592.46 Cycle 4 3611921320063 0099020002 TANYA HAYES 6337 GIRARD AVE N $110.97 Cycle 4 3611921410007 0001440008 CYNTHIA BLANC 6354 WILLOW LA N $161.69 Cycle 4 3611921320050 0099110001 ANGELA WUENSCH 6400 GIRARD AVE N $949.75 Cycle 4 3411921320010 0023080009 TOM HERRICK 6400 MAJOR AVE N $643.97 Cycle 3 3311921410017 0022610004 BEE YANG 6400 ORCHARD AVE N $526.52 Cycle 3 3311921410112 0021110006 TONG GE YANG _ 6400 REGENT AVE N $156.92 Cycle 3 3411921320008 0023220001 JOSEPH SCHORN 6401 LEE AVE N I $641.14 Cycle 3 3611921310004 0000060005 SHARI MANIER 6406 COLFAX AVE N $867.08 Cycle 4 3611921320029 0099370001 JOHN HEABERLIN-KIM 6406 FREMONT AVE N $22656 Cycle 4 3511921310013 0034690007 MOHAMED D HASSAN 6407 BROOKLYN DR $429.57 Cycle 5 3411921320114 0025740006 DENNIS WELLS 6407 KYLE AVE N $280.31 Cycle 3 3311921410055 0022320000 MARY ROONEY 6412 PERRY AVE N $622.89 Cycle 3 3611921320017 0099710008 PETER WOGBAH 6413 DUPONT AVE N $205.45 Cycle 4 3311921410006 0022740009 SUSAN BATES 6413 NOBLE AVE N $551.98 Cycle 3 3411921310106 0030150001 ARENA LEARNING CTR 6415 BROOKLYN BLVD $4,869.62 Cycle 3 3411921320005 0023190006 CHONG VUE 6419 LEE AVE N $179.42 Cycle 3 3411921310071 0028600009 JEREMY ZIEBARTH 6419 MARLIN DR $634.06 Cycle 3 3311921410108 0021140201 MICHAEL LAFAVE 6424 REGENT AVE N $678.89 Cycle 3 3611921310039 0099860001 JENNIFER BROWN 6430 DUPONT AVE N $155.09 Cycle 4 3611921320036 0099160006 ROB DARSOW 6430 GIRARD AVE N $785.37 Cycle 4 3611921320044 0098900006 TODD DOONAN 6430'HUMBOLDT AVE N $113.32 Cycle 4 3411921310061 0028190001 CECILIA WEAH 6430 JUNE AVE N $83.57 Cycle 3 3411921310089 0028500001 KENNETH OLSON 6430 MARLIN DR $684.08 Cycle 3 3411921320019 0022950004 JON L HUDLOW 6431 MAJOR AVE N $603.02 Cycle 3 3411921310079 0028680001 HARRY NARINE 6436 INDIANA AVE N $173.81 Cycle 3 3311921420011 0021590009 BERISSO BEKUTO 6436 SCOTT AVE N $165.32 Cycle 3 3411921320093 0026330005 TINA ROBINSON 6437 JUNE AVE N $409.98 Cycle 3 3611921410010 0001370007 JOANNE BERG 6440 WILLOW LA N $165.65 Cycle 4 3411921320107 0026310007 SERENA XEE YANG 6442 KYLE AVE N $323.59 Cycle 3 3611921320083 0099440002 MORPH LLC 6443 EMERSON AVE N $182.81 Cycle 3311921410001 0022690006 AYESHA BOBRAY 6443 NOBLE AVE N $355.63 Cycle 3 3311921410031 0022370005 KAOLEE YANG 6443 ORCHARD AVE N $148.52 Cycle 3 I • • • 3411921130084 0030370005 MAE PROPERTIES LLP 6500 BROOKLYN BLVD $2,109.59 Cycle 3 3411921130067 0031110004 ROBERT LOYD 6501 BEARD AVE N $117.96 Cycle 3 3511921310009 0035060002 MARK HACKETT 6501 BROOKLYN DR $651.34 Cycle 5 3411921130070 0031080009 SOLANGE DAVIS-RIVERA 6512 CHOWEN AVE N $365.23 Cycle 3 3411921130064 0031140001 JAY VAUGHAN 6519 BEARD AVE N $549.08 Cycle 3 3311921130014 0019870009 JED RANCOUR 6524 UNITY AVE N $728.01 Cycle 3 3411921130045 0030970002 EBRIMATOURAY 6537 CHOWEN AVE N $679.46 Cycle 3411921130060 0031180007 JANIS SALO 6543 BEARD AVE N $679.34 Cycle 3 3611921130128 0055430008 ABHISHEK MEHTA 6543 RIVERWOOD LA $738.16 Cycle 2 3611921130129 0055420009 LOURDES TALAN 6549 RIVERWOOD LA $225.98 Cycle 2 3611921130105 0056720209 LEROY MASSAQUOI 6601 CAMDEN DR $233.42 Cycle 2 3611921130103 0056710903 MAMBU DUNBAR 6605 CAMDEN DR $254.49 Cycle 2 3411921240056 0030480101 MIKE BELL 6607 FRANCE AVE N $143.72 Cycle 3 3511921230063 0016330209 KELLY HANSON-CARLSON 6608 XERXES PL N $130.00 Cycle 1 3611921130096 0056710200 JAMIE EDWARDS 6620 CAMDEN DR $621.01 Cycle 2 3611921240016 0058230009 TROY KOUBSKY 6626 BRYANT AVE N $734.26 Cycle 2 3511921230075 0016330902 TANYA E PETERSON 6633 XERXES PL N $149.81 Cycle 1 3611921130090 0056700508 WALTER TOGBA 6636 CAMDEN DR $656.31 Cycle 2 3611921240045 0059350004 ALYN EASTIN 6642 DUPONT AVE N $442.33 Cycle 2 3411921120017 0007650003 WILLY FRANKLYN 6700 EWING AVE N $787.23 Cycle 1 3311921110052 0001960002 MICHAEL BRAUN 6700 PERRY AVE N $268.08 Cycle 1 3311921110087 0001640000 DEBORAH SALITERMAN 6700 QUAIL AVE N $541.82 Cycle 1 3611921210075 0061050006 LATIN WORK REMODELING CORP 6701 BRYANT AVE N $62.35 Cycle 2 3411921210014 0007340001 SOONTAREE LIBEL 6701 FRANCE AVE N $250.88 Cycle 1 3511921110058 0060820300 LISA JOHNSON 6704 IRVING PL N $149.42 Cycle 2 3411921120026 0007950007 MICHELLE MURCH 6707 DREW AVE N $616.07 Cycled 3311921110078 0001360005 DARIUS GILES 6707 QUAIL AVE N $770.66 Cycle 1 3511921110057 0060820409 HIMIE FREEMAN 6708 IRVING PL N $480.08 Cycle 2 3311921120044 0000660009 STACY DAVIS 6712 TOLEDO AVE N $514,68 Cycle 1 3611921210049 0059060009 KENNETH KING 6713 COLFAX AVE N $847.25 Cycle 2 3311921120038 0000480002 RESIDENT 6713 TOLEDO AVE N $369.74 Cycle 1 3411921210017 0007100009 AGNES AUSTIN 6714 GRIMES AVE N $769.22 Cycle 1 3411921210012 0007320003 PAUL GALLUP 6715 FRANCE AVE N $364.19 Cycle 1 3311921110058 0001670007 LAURA LILLIGREN 6715 PERRY AVE N $285.69 Cycle 1 • • • 3611921210079 0061010000 TIMOTHY FRANKLIN 6718 BRYANT AVE N $734.44 Cycle 2 3411921120024 0007930009 NANCY XIONG 6719 DREW AVE N $161.69 Cycle 1 3611921120056 0056780005 KIM CARTIER 67215TH ST N $95.09 Cycle 2 3611921120015 0055100007 TERRANCE MAGAL15 6724 WILLOW LA N $717.51 Cycle 2 3311921120100 0001070000 KRISTEN SCHMITTOU 6725 REGENT AVE N $564.86 Cycle 1 3311921120075 0000970002 ROBERT N OLSON 6730 SCOTT AVE N $112.30 Cycle 1 3311921120099 0001080009 MICHAEL GEHRUNG 6731 REGENT AVE N $156.41 Cycle 1 3611921220035 0060050007 JOHN E LEE 6733 EMERSON AVE N $220.12 Cycle 2 3611921210037 0057720000 FRANCES AKINDELE 6736 COLFAX AVE N $172.25 Cycle 2 3311921120040 0000700003 KIMBERLY SYKES 6736 TOLEDO AVE N $920.77 Cycle 1 3611921210044 0059110002 JUDY HIGBEE 6743 COLFAX AVE N $87.13 Cycle 2 3311921120009 0000010007 WILLIAM REIN 6800 TOLEDO AVE N $471.95 Cycle 1 3411921120047 0007880006 MICHAEL MILLER 6801 DREW AVE N $843.00 Cycle 1 3311921120072 0000790004 KAREN EDEBURN 6801 SCOTT AVE N $719.66 Cycle 1 3611921220079 0060170102 DENNIS LONDON 6805 FREMONT PL N $193.49 Cycle 2 3411921110038 0009490002 EUGENE SUGGS 6806 BEARD AVE N $811.22 Cycle 1 3411921120033 0008060004 LINDATATUM 6806 DREW AVE N $161.69 Cycle 1 3411921120069 0007440009 RESIDENT 6806 FRANCE AVE N $679.30 Cycle 1 3311921110035 0001870003 LISA PARKER 6806 PERRY AVE N $181.98 Cycle 1 3411921120046 0007870007 CARMEN CATTLEDGE 6807 DREW AVE N $828.07 Cycle 1 3611921220008 0059650007 RESIDENT 6807 DUPONT AVE N $363.17 Cycle 2 3611921210030 0058090007 ARCHIE TART JR 6811 BRYANT AVE N $150.01 Cycle 2 3411921120050 0007750001 GEORGE MARSHALL 6812 EWING AVE N $686.34 Cycle 1 3311921110013 0002150009 RAUL ERICKSON 6812 ORCHARD AVE N $658.50 Cycle 1 3311921120062 0000920007 LANKIA LARTEY 6812 SCOTT AVE N $213.83 Cycle 1 3411921110061 0009290006 ELIZABETH PARADES PAULINO 6812 ZENITH AVE N $520.82 Cycle 1 3611921220022 0059760004 SALIMATU BUTLER 6818 EMERSON AVE N $1,474.18 Cycle 2 3411921120051 0007760000 LORRAINE SENESCALL 6818 EWING AVE N $458.67 Cycle 1 3311921110062 0001530003 JOEY C NIENABER 6818 QUAIL AVE N $737.89 Cycle 1 3311921120061 0000910008 KEVIN ERICKSON 6818 SCOTT AVE N $284.37 Cycle 1 3611921220031 0060090003 JOHN SOLOMON 6819 EMERSON AVE N $851.68 Cycle 2 3611921220106 0060171803 AMANDA HORKEY 6819 FREMONT PL N $69.64 Cycle 2 3311921120014 0000200004 DIANNA ANDERSON 6819 TOLEDO AVE N $427.52 Cycle 1 3611921220074 0060190704 JAMES EVERETT 6820 FREMONT PL N $205.91 Cycle 2 • • • 3611921210032 0058110003 LEMUEL PORTER 6823 BRYANT AVE N $783.34 Cycle 2 3411921110015 0016240507 JOEY L LASH 6831 YORK PL $128.80 Cycle 1 3611921220102 0060172207 AARICA COLEMAN 6835 FREMONT PL N $101.86 Cycle 2 3311921110009 0002110003 ROBERT SHAW 6836 ORCHARD'AVE N $785.37 Cycle 1 3311921120066 0000850006 JESSICA STEGBAUER 6837 SCOTT AVE N $641.81 Cycle 1 3611921220101 0060172306 KEVIN P GUSTAFSON 6839 FREMONT PL N $625.25 Cycle 2 3311921110038 0001790003 MICK MAGUIRE 6839 PERRY AVE N $796.81 Cycle 1 3611921220026 0059720008 MICHAEL P KHON 6842 EMERSON AVE N $176.21 Cycle 2 3611921210013 0059180005 JESENIA RUACHO 6843 COLFAX AVE N $342.11 Cycle 2 3311921120065 0000860005 SHARON BRACK -_6843 SCOTT AVE N $410.38 Cycle 1 3611921120061 0050120109 GREGORY CHILEEN 6857 DALLAS RD $627.65 Cycle 2 2611921430007 0011890006 CARL OSTERLUND 6900 MORGAN AVE N $143.21 Cycle 2 2811921430007 0006080004 TENG MOUA 6901 REGENT AVE N $177.00 Cycle 1 2811921430058 0006382004 JAMEY BAKKEN 6901 UNITY AVE N $325.58 Cycle 1 2711921330030 0004020002 SCOTT PHILLIPS 6906 MAJOR AVE N $159.05 Cycle 1 2811921430009 0006100000 PHILL SMOGER 6906 SCOTT AVE N $835.71 Cycle 1 2711921430102 0009960004 JOEL VANDENBOOM 6907 PALMER LAKE DR W $737.74 Cycle 1 2611921430009 0011870008 JAMES ANDERSON 6912 MORGAN AVE N $79.05 Cycle 2 2611921430016 0011280000 KIM BOIKE 6913 MORGAN AVE N $468.88 Cycle 2 2711921330042 0004060008 DAN DEMPSEY 6915 MAJOR AVE N $668.66 Cycle 1 2711921340037 0013110000 ANNE BYDLON 6918 HALIFAX AVE N $597.83 Cycle 1 2711921330013 0003800008 DEAN LITTLE 6927 BROOKLYN BLVD $381.09 Cycle 1 2711921340039 0013130008 SONYA HERR 6930 HALIFAX AVE N $617.37 Cycle 1 2711921340021 0014170003 PAUL ROWE 6930 INDIANA AVE N $310.64 Cycle 1 2611921430037 0010540008 MICHAEL RASMUSSEN 6930 OLIVER AVE N $143.21 Cycle 2 2511921430032 0050080006 MARIA RAJ 6931 DALLAS RD $216.28 Cycle 2 2811921440049 0005720006 NICOLE FINN 6931 QUAIL AVE N $493.61 Cycle 1 2611921430001 0011950008 MATTHEW JONES 6933 LOGAN AVE N $175.99 Cycle 2 2711921330039 0004090005 SEAN SULLIVAN 6933 MAJOR AVE N $422.63 Cycle 1 2711921330035 0003970009 JONATHAN EVARTS 6936 MAJOR AVE N $799.31 Cycle 1 2811921430067 0006381105 GERALD FOSTER 6937 UNITY AVE N $159.05 Cycle 1 2711921330102 0099992145 J & P INVESTMENTS LLC 6940 BROOKLYN BLVD $1,572.33 Cycle 1 2711921340073 0012550008 JOAN M PAVLIK 6942 GRIMES AVEN $287.01 Cycle 1 2711921430021 0010630000 JOHN,OTTO 6943 DREW AVE N $160.37 Cycle 1 • 2711921430093 0011000005 DAVID WYLIE 6943 PALMER LAKE DR W $743.14 Cycle 1 2511921330033 0021570002 EMMANUEL NKETAH 7001 EMERSON AVE N $605.92 Cycle 2 2811921440047 0005700008 MICHAEL BRADFORD 7001 QUAIL AVE N $889.16 Cycle 1 2711921430044 0010390001 KARI DRISTE 7007 EWING AVE N $675.66 Cycle 1 2611921430082 0010730005 LEIGH COLLIER 7007 NEWTON AVE N $706.48 Cycle 2 2711921430032 0010470001 ANNATHOMAS 7012 EWING AVE N $674.55 Cycle 1 2611921440021 0014020007 PAUL CAVALLARO 7013 KNOX AVE N $693.04 Cycle 2 2811921430114 0006382905 SL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC 7013 UNITY AVE N $161.69 Cycle 1 2811921430115 0006382806 BRENDA LTRAFTON 7017 UNITY AVE N $163.01 Cycle 1 2611921440056 0013230003 OMAR ADAMS 7018 IRVING AVE N $156.41 Cycle 2 2811921430079 0006382608 JOY REINHART 7020 UNITY AVE N $587.93 Cycle 1 2511921330038 0021510008 ANTHONY BROWN 7024 FREMONT AVE N $769.09 Cycle 2 2611921430093 0010460009 CARLOS VALDEZ 7024 OLIVER CIR $482.74 Cycle 2 2711921430016 0010580007 SHATARA LUNGELOW 7025 DREW AVE N $515.18 Cycle 1 2511921330061 0021130005 KELLY DAVIS 7025 FREMONT AVE N $744.01 Cycle 2 2611921440063 0013300004 LATRICE DAVIS 7025 HUMBOLDTAVE N $710.07 Cycle 2 2611921430042 0012020009 DR. CHIKE ONYEKABA 7025 LOGAN AVE N $679.77 Cycle 2 2611921430094 0010450000 PATRICIA MITCHELL 7028 OLIVER AVE N $301.25 Cycle 2 2711921330082 0014470007 ANDREA WALKER 7030 BROOKLYN BLVD $758.48 Cycle 1 2611921430074 0011120008 LAMAR WALKER 7030 NEWTON AVE N $426.28 Cycle 2 2511921330028 0021620005 AGHARESE AGHAYEDO 7031 EMERSON AVE N $649.98 Cycle 2 2611921440033 0013090001 ANNABELLE GREGORY 7031 JAMES AVE N $643.42 Cycle 2 2711921430002 0010750006 JEFFREY GRANDELL 7036 DREW AVE N $620.35 Cycle 1 2511921330024 0021960005 ROBERT SCOTT 7036 EMERSON AVE N $577.40 Cycle 2 2711921430014 0010560009 TIMOTHY J GRAHAM 7037 DREW AVE N $745.31 Cycle 1 2511921330059 0021150003 EDWINA MCGILL 7037 FREMONT AVE N $219.15 Cycle 2 2711921330084 0014480006 YA VANG 7038 BROOKLYN BLVD $1,003.46 Cycle 1 2711921430001 0010760005 SARAH DAVIS 7040 DREW AVE N $159.05 Cycle 1 2711921430061 0010180006 RACHEL GILBERT 7042 FRANCE AVE N $156.41 Cycle 1 2611921440004 0012370008 MARGARET GREEN 7042 LOGAN AVE N $659.10 Cycle 2 2711921330086 0014480204 VELMER PORTE 7046 BROOKLYN BLVD $808.99 Cycle 1 2511921320088 0021650002 DAVID FIEDLER 7049 EMERSON AVE N $923.15 Cycle 2 2711921420008 0010790002 SUSAN BRANSTROM 7052 DREW AVE N $455.93 Cycle 1 2711921420006 0010810008 SOOM XIONG 7060 DREW AVE N $166.31 Cycle 1 2811921430138 0006389207 SHARON WILSON 7065 UNITY AVE N $79.29 Cycle 1 2711921330091 0014510109 ALBRECHT LTD 7066 BROOKLYN BLVD $799.09 Cycle 1 2711921330093 0014500100 MACAULAYIGINIAMRE 7074 BROOKLYN BLVD $271.43 Cycle 1 2811921430141 0006388902 ROSIE TIMS 7077 UNITY AVE N $120.99 Cycle 1 2511921320064 0020160003 SUSANNAH K GUAH 7100 HUMBOLDT AVE N $182.75 Cycle 2 2711921320015 0015000001 ARNOLD OHOTTO 7100 LEE AVE N $507.09 Cycle 1 2511921320040 0020510009 JAMES PAJIBO 7101 GIRARD AVE N $537.35 Cycle 2 2511921420022 0050570006 MALINDA-MAE PENNINGTON PESCHONG 7106 DALLAS RD $67.52 Cycle 2 2611921420024 0012060005 JOSEPH KEENAN 7107 LOGAN AVE N $601.07 Cycle 2 2811921410023 0004180400 PATRICIA NAFSTAD 7108 PERRY PL $153.77 Cycle 1 2811921430133 0006387102 ANTRENISE RETIC 7108 UNITY AVE N $301.83 Cycle 1 2511921410020 0051160005 MRS. MARION CARLSON 7109 WILLOW LA N $571.13 Cycle 2 2811921410026 0004190409 DOROTHY C RUSSELL 7111 PERRY PL $158.69 Cycle 1 2711921310043 0013310006 SAIYID N RIZVI 7112 HALIFAX AVE N $496.55 Cycle 1 2711921320103 0015730003 BRETT ROBIDEAU 7112 JUNE AVE N $715.34 Cycle 1 2511921320038 0020530007 FLORA HILL 7113 GIRARD AVE N $686.57 Cycle 2 2711921320115 0015690009 BETH CARTER 7113 JUNE AVE N $725.38 Cycle 1 2711921420025 0010230009 STANLEY LEINO 7118 FRANCE AVE N $720.22 Cycle 1 2711921320013 0015260001 DELARNAS MCGHEE 7118 LEE AVE N $1,107.02 Cycle 1 2711921320035 0015050006 PA N VANG 7118 MAJOR AVE N $178.85 Cycle 1 2611921420047 0011070005 MARK EDSON 7118 NEWTON AVE N $542.44 Cycle 2 2711921310037 0012920003 YAI GBAMY 7119 GRIMES AVE N $287.50 Cycle 1 2511921320085 0021420000 LARRY LEAKS 7124 FREMONT AVE N $819.33 . Cycle 2 2711921310045 0013330004 ROBERTTHATCHER 7124 HALIFAX AVE N $678.74 Cycle 1 2711921310094 0015970005 YENENESH KIBRAT-PERRY 7124 INDIANA AVE N $263.00 Cycle 1 2711921420015 0010270005 ISIDRO SANTELLANES 7125 EWING AVE N $156.42 Cycle 1 0111821240035 0092650003 NATASHA L GUNDERSEN 713 58TH AVE N $746.84 Cycle 4 2711921320093 0015520008 BRETT CORBITT 7130 KYLE AVE N $693.05 Cycle 1 2711921310064 _0012710008 TONI JESINOSKI 7142 GRIMES AVE N $710.96 Cycle 1 2811921420037 0006394207 JULIE M SAMPSON 7176 UNITY AVE N $663.83 Cycled 2811921420097 0006400103 KIMBERLY CARPENTER 7189 UNITY AVE N $720.43 Cycle 1 2711921320048 0014590002 DEWEY R LEDIN 7200 NOBLE AVE N $862.08 Cycle 1 2711921310008 0012230007 TODD SCROLL 7201 FRANCE AVE N $160.37 Cycle 1 2611921420076 0010860000 MARY ZILKE 7201 NEWTON AVE N $717.94 Cycle 2 2811921410150 0004370308 FAIZA L KHAN 7201 PERRY CT E $469.71 Cycle 1 2811921410090 0004360309 BARBARA LATHAM 7204 PERRY CT E $759.16 Cycle 1 2511921320080 0021670000 SAMUEL WHITE 7207 EMERSON AVE N $700.78 Cycle 2 2711921410006 0011550009 ANDREW NEW 7207 PALMER LAKE DR W $152.45 Cycle 1 2811921410182 0004320105 TRINATAYLOR 7207 PERRY CT E $85.17 Cycled 2511921420039 0050420004 DAN WHITTENBURG 7211 DALLAS RD $864.35 Cycle 2 2511921310040 0023010007 KEVIN J O'HARA 7212 ALDRICH CT $820.63 Cycle 2 2511921320056 0020060005 WILLIAM CORWIN 7212 HUMBOLDT AVE N $295.45 Cycle 2 2511921320102 0022300003 ELLIOT 0 SUN DLEE 7213 DUPONT AVE N $664.30 Cycle 2 2711921310105 0015870007 STEPHEN LONG 7213 INDIANA AVE N $470.00 Cycle 1 2511921310083 0022920008 ALYATTU CAPEHART 7217 CAMDEN AVE N $408.97 Cycle 2 2511921320109 0021880005 JOHN A LITZAU 7218 EMERSON AVE N $913.39 Cycle 2 2511921310049 0023150001 RESIDENT 7219 BRYANT AVE N $403.08 Cycle 2 2511921310049 0023150001 BRADY COTTON 7219 BRYANT AVE N $158.07 Cycle 2 2511921320101 0022310002 LUCAS MADSEN 7219 DUPONT AVE N $383.69 Cycle 2 2511921320028 0020610007 MICHAEL HELLE 7219 GIRARD AVE N $282.14 Cycle 2 2711921310021 0012840003 JAMES EDWARDS 7219 GRIMES AVE N $111.39 Cycle 1 2611921420057 0011530008 JOSEPH YANG 7219 MORGAN AVE N $468.69 Cycle 2 2711921310004 0012190003 DAVID BWOCHORA 7225 FRANCE AVE N $75.14 Cycle 1 2711921310066 0013480007 AMY BERTRAM 7225 HALIFAX AVE N $579.37 Cycle 1 2511921420029 0050660005 LISA M CANNON-RATLIFF 7226 DALLAS RD $351.45 Cycle 2 2611921410014 0014500107 PAULA HASTINGS 7227 HUMBOLDT AVE N $254.59 Cycle 2 2711921310019 0012820005 CHONG MOUATHAO 7231 GRIMES AVE N $547.37 Cycled 2511921320052 0020020108 ADAM VERZALIK 7234 HUMBOLDTAVE N $779.09 Cycle 2 2611921420100 0010240005 LEROYCE WALKERFIELDS 7237 OLIVER AVE N $136.34 Cycle 2 2511921410039 0051020001 ALIRENA BROWN 7237 WILLOW LA N $654.94 Cycle 2 2811921410204 0004600050 MN CLN SVC INC 7240 BROOKLYN BLVD $2,972.10 Cycle 1 2511921420032 0050700009 LOUIS A SIMBANA PEDRO 7242 DALLAS RD $738.03 Cycle 2 2511921310045 0022790005 TREACY JEFFERSON 7243 BRYANT AVE N $153.77 Cycle 2 2711921310001 0012160006 KERRY GOVAN 7243 FRANCE AVE N $691.71 Cycle 1 2611921410101 0014190107 TODD BULLOCK 7243 KNOX AVE N $173.26 Cycle 2 2811921420372 0006378705 ESI NUAH 7270 UNITY AVE N $229.89 Cycle 1 2511921310075 0022900000 TIARRATOLIVER 731 WOODBINE LA $375.97 Cycle 0111821310006 0081040005 GERALD MELLESMOEN 80157TH AVE N $350.01 Cycle 6 3611921240013 0058200002 KATHY WILLIAMS 81167TH AVE N $687.61 Cycle 2 0111821240066 0094350008 RICKY L WASHINGTON 816 57TH AVE N $424.41 Cycle 4 2511921310011 0022680008 MICHAEL PRATT 824 WOODBINE LA $678.22 Cycle 2 0111821310084 0080870006 JULIE SUCKOW 827 57TH AVE N $586.57 Cycle 6 0111821340082 0083330008 ARIA LOVETT 904 53RD AVE N $147.32 Cycle 6 2511921310021 0022710003 LEE A WALKER 912 WOODBINE LA $564.35 Cycle 2 TOTAL COUNT=889 $462,366.32 D S/o(o It 2- 2,0(2— . 13cer,�.(�►� NEW Pending Assessment Pending No. SZ S PID Address Pended Amount 3`t-ttq- 21- tq - 002-9 nJ- 2(a0. V ot- tt - 2 - 31 - 00 1 55-00 i3r Ave-t\)- 1757.3( S- tt9 -2l- ti -0058 V70Lf I I/V(ALA PI j7• RS* 119- 2t- 43- onlso S33c)-(o2-"9 Aver-)- 8� 8 i Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CALLLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DELINQUENT PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICE ACCOUNTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that: . 1. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of September,2012,in City Hall at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard,to pass upon the proposed assessments for Delinquent Public Utility Service Accounts. 2. The City Clerk,with the assistance of the Director of Fiscal&Support Services, shall forthwith prepare assessment rolls for the above charges and shall keep them on file and open to inspection by any interested persons. 3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the Public Hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing. 4. The City lerk shall cause mailed notice to be iven to the owner of each parcel Y g • P described in such assessment rolls not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. August 13 2012 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • City Council Agenda Item No. 6f COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: August 13, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City >Manager V s FROM: Vickie Schleuning, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building&Community Standards SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring a Public Nuisance and Ordering the Removal of Diseased Trees Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council declare a public nuisance and order the removal of diseased trees for certain properties as listed in the resolution. Background: The attached resolution represents the official Council action required to expedite removal of diseased trees that were recently marked by the city tree inspector. The City of Brooklyn Center • has maintained a policy of removing and properly disposing of diseased trees in order to prevent tree diseases from spreading throughout the community. The removal of diseased trees is defined in City Ordinance Chapter 20-301to 20-306. Although the City has historically focused on Dutch Elm disease, other transmissible diseases and infestations are addressed as well. Property owners are given the opportunity to remove the diseased tree on their own or enter an agreement to allow the city to remove.the diseased tree. Where an agreement with the property owner is executed, a minimal administrative charge of$50 is applied to the costs associated with the tree removal. After a diseased tree is declared a public nuisance by the City Council, another Compliance Notice will be provided to the property owner allowing additional time, at least five days, for voluntary correction,again providing an option for an agreement with the City. If the property owner does not correct the violation or enter into an agreement,the City will remove the diseased tree. An administrative abatement service charge will be charged based on the cost of the abatement,with a minimum charge of$150. Budget Issues: The City's share of the cost of removal for diseased trees within the public right-of-way and on City property is included in the 2012 budget under the Public Works Forestry operating,budget. The cost of removal for diseased trees located on private property is the responsibility of the . respective property owner, and if unpaid, is specially assessed to the property. Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Council Goals: Strategic: 8. We will encourage citywide environmental sustainability efforts. Ongoing: 1. We will provide streamlined, cost effective, quality services with limited resources. • • Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE REMOVAL OF DISEASED TREES AT CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN BROOKLYN CENTER MINNESOTA WHEREAS, Brooklyn Center City Code Section 20-301 declares any diseased tree a public nuisance and provides for abatement by the City if not corrected by the property owner; and WHEREAS, removal of diseased trees and abatement of the public nuisances is necessary to prevent the spread of tree diseases and to protect the environmental quality and desirability of neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, a Notice to Abate Nuisance and a Diseased Tree Removal Agreement has been issued to the owners of certain properties in the City of Brooklyn Center allowing the owners twenty(20)days to remove diseased trees on the owners' roe and P p rtY WHEREAS,the City can expedite the removal of these diseased trees by declaring them a public nuisance. • NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center,Minnesota,that: 1. The diseased tree at the following address is hereby declared to be a public nuisance. Property Address Tree Type and No. 6035 Bryant Ave N Elm-72 5901 Halifax Ave N Elm—74 5348 Sailor Lane Elm—75 1612 69 Ave N Birch—77 7223 Brooklyn Blvd Elm—78 67 Ave N&Hwy 252(Vacant) Elm—79 7018 Brooklyn Blvd Birch—83 6007 Halifax PI Elm-82 5323 Brooklyn Blvd Birch—85 & 87 6113 Xerxes Ave N Elm—86 2. After twenty(20)days from the date of the initial notice,the property owner(s)will receive a second written notice providing five(5)business days in which to contest the determination of the City Council by requesting, in writing, a hearing. Said request shall be filed with the City Clerk. RESOLUTION NO. • 3. After five(5)days,if the property owner fails to request a hearing,the tree(s)shall be removed by the City. The cost of abatement shall be recorded and become the personal responsibility of the owner of record. If unpaid,the costs shall be specially assessed to the property in accordance with city codes and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. August 13,2012 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • City Council Agenda Item No. 6g 1 COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: August 7, 2012 TO: Curt Bo ane City g y, y FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer R SUBJECT: A Resolution Vacating Certain Easements Within Outlot One, Donnays Brook Lyn Gardens 5th Addition; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Maranatha Addition; and Part of Storm Sewer Easement 3211239, Hennepin County, Minnesota Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the resolution vacating certain easements as referenced above pertaining to the Maranatha site redevelopment in connection with the,final plat approval of MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION. Background: The City Council adopted the resolution granting final plat approval for the MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION development at its meeting on June 25, 2012. In connection with the final plat and easement dedication proceedings, the developer is requesting release and termination of easements that are either no longer needed or are being replaced by new easements. The following easements are proposed to be released and terminated as indicated: • All publicly dedicated drainage and utility easements as-shown on Outlot One, Donnays Brook Lyn Gardens 5th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and shown as crosshatched in the attached Exhibit A 1; and • All publicly dedicated drainage and utility easements as shown on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Maranatha Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and shown as crosshatched in the attached Exhibits A2 and A3; and • That part of Storm sewer easement Number 3211239, and shown as crosshatched in the attached Exhibit A4; and As part of the public hearing and notification process, affected entities with interests in said existing easements have been notified in accordance with City Ordinance and State Statute.All areas that need to retain permanent easement rights have been fully encompassed by rededicated easements as part of the project's final plat and should not negatively affect rights to public easements. We are unaware of any entity objecting to the proposed vacations. The attached easements and exhibits outline the release and termination of easements and show the locations of said existing easements. The City Attorney has reviewed the release and termination documents and concurs to the purpose and form of the documents. Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. !Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safi:,inclusive community that enhances the quality,of life fir alt people and Preserves the Public trust COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Council Goals: Strategic: 1. We will proceed aggressively with implementation of City's redevelopment plans Y p Ongoing: 1. We will provide streamlined, cost effective, quality services with limited resources Mission:Lnsuruug an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive conunuunity that enhances the quality of life .ft>r ail people and preserves the pultlic trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION VACATING CERTAIN EASEMENTS WITHIN OUTLOT ONE, DONNAYS BROOKLYN GARDENS 5T"ADDITION;LOTS 1 AND 2,BLOCK 1, MARANATHA ADDITION; AND PART OF STORM SEWER EASEMENT 3211239,HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the plat for MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION based on certain conditions as set forth in the City Council Resolutions Nos.2012-91 and 2012-92 and Planning ommission Resolution No. 2012-11• and g , WHEREAS, certain existing easements on existing properties are either no longer needed,or are being replaced by new easements pertaining to the properties contained within the plat for MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION; and WHEREAS,the easements proposed to be vacated are identified as follows and are hereafter referred to as "the Easements": All publicly dedicated drainage and utility easements as shown on Outlot One, D onna s Brook Lyn Gardens 5 to Addition Hennepin County,Minnesota,and shown as crosshatched in the attached Exhibit A1; and All publicly dedicated drainage and utility easements as' shown on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Maranatha Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and shown as crosshatched in the attached Exhibits A2 and A3; and That part of Storm sewer easement Number 3211239, and shown as crosshatched in the attached Exhibit A4; and WHEREAS,after due notice and public hearing,the City Council has determined that the Easements will be no longer needed, once the plat of MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION is recorded, and it is in the public interest to vacate the Easements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1. The City Council hereby approves the vacation of the Easements described above and depicted in the attached Exhibits Al through A4. The City Clerk is directed to prepare.a Notice of Completion of Vacation Proceedings and to record it with the Hennepin County Recorder or Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, as RESOLUTION NO. appropriate;provided,that this resolution will only take effect upon the release and filing of the final plat of MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION. August 13, 2012 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. EXHIBIT OF EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED /,// ' ��� EXHIBIT Al rrn_L_vrr LJ"1IVL ��80 /"� All/1/T//1A/ nL/L//I/-./ V , rM mewsr ,../. .;v P:.'; °7,i "0M cum or 11v.�' $ wam uc a nc K i/.i (589 5J50£J 6awMO ar scrna u r.iia u S89 5709'E 499.80 U iV/ n /�) r; /AV ^ T 77 ^ U U) v U Cti � A r Nhs / N V OO 1/l A ••? V R1�t J ,r a z1 a all N Q) '1 II : wz U O r C WOo — H•m W A !1 /l / T / /1• A/ z z Q !i LJ L/ IF l l V: /v 0$o U) aa� o N8915725"W 501.01 (N89-54,03"W) ll/lA/A/A\/^ "y/1n/' /./A/ /.A) SAVI / Alln/t//1A/ tw/v/vn/J Ch vv/( A_/lr vnh✓ ,:^ �••/T/!7 nti✓///v/v I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated t 7th day of A gust 012. SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. By. Drainage & Utility Easement per DONNAYS EASEMENT TO BE VACATED B �r �1� Mark S. Hanson, P.L.S. Minn. Lic. No 15480 tRevised LYN GARDENS 5TH ADDITION S UNDE 9001 East Bloomington Freeway 5420 •Suite 118 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420-3435 to show underlying plat MLS 08/07/2012 952-881-2455 (Fax: 952-888-9526) 5A003—ESMTVAC.dw g MLS 03/07/2012 LAND SURVEYING Www-sunde.com 015—A 593/38 T.119, R.21, S.33 EXHIBIT A2 - EXHIBIT OF EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED !nr l CR c' • 2A1 L/ nL/UlI/VIAY' lo+o..om 1[AI1H ll[4 M K t/a YTIM I t�Q S a¢in,s;r.ii5 ui 69 H n iP U�C' iiVR,'H S [S89'5J'50-E] 589 57'09£ 499.80 C7 C) ivi n /�) n 1A v � T r7/ n �i n CU v Di ri (G N V g o, q C) q 1 •q A, I �i 0 C) CJ II _ L U C j A !l /'l 1 T 1 n At n U U / / l V 1 V Q U (n N89'5725'W 501.01 [,V89 54'a5'MJ -AlA lA 1/(` /111 11/ /1A �ClrC` Af1n IT//.AI vv/Yl L��IV-K t.rr'Y' ,nlrt�uL/r.; -;[i nuv/llVr• I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated t 12 h da of une, 12. SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. EASEMENT TO BE VACATED By. - -- Mark S. Hanson, P.L.S. Minn. Lic. No. 15480 Drainage Easement per MARANATHA ADDITION. UNDE 9001 East Bloomington Freeway (350)• Suite 118 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420-3435 S 1 • 952-881-2455 (Fax: 952-888-9526) 2012015A003-EWTVACAwg MLS 03/07/2012 LAND SURVEYING www.sunde.com 2012-015-A 593/38 T.119, R.21, S.33 EXHIBIT A3 EXHIBIT OF EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED At 11 1 1 11E- f� m/LLL� ' IYMM Ih CaYOI O g 1 b.arrJlR tv., naro IO.O.1�ear 1H c.s;.rL ,..,. roc a:,•, �, a a rnl Iw.elp IOIIN 1!tf M IL I/t C I t.l 1t11a a aio a•Jn ul 69TH n i'P,iv£ 'vOR,H g [S89•u'ao e) g PM"W" CAW a 589'57'09'£ 499.80 i DRAINAGE&UTIUTY EASEMENT PER MARANATHA AD017ICN C� A' A ) A A/ A T / / A S� lV/ /--I n !V n / r7 n I I J 1 O A a�LT v V UU mV VZ Ch e tv q 00 I` q II I � q mc U C s� J A M /'1 I T / In A! 41 V I V LI U DRAINAGE& C<7 (n UnUTY EASEAENT Zg PER YARANATHA c ADOMO N I I i ,V89 5725'W SOL01 [Nes34bs'w) 5R7' A/l nnIT//1AI VV/YIYI'i/v VV LIMY 1.V9 (!L/Y... I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated t 12 h do of une, 12. SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. EASEMENT TO BE VACATED gY r Mark S. Hanson, P.L.S. Minn. Lic. No. 15480 Drainage & Utility Easements per MARANATHA ADDITION. SUNDE 9001 East Bloomington Freeway (350)•Suite 118 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420-3435 952-881-2455 (Fax: 952-888-9526) 2012015A003-ESMTVAC.dwg MLS 03/07/2012 JILAND SURYEFING Wes+.sunde.00m 2012-015-A 593/38 T.119, R.21, S_33 EXHIBIT A4 EXHIBIT OF EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED (N II.LL A! ("( r ( C- T !� L 1 ��� V /Y V .. I//LLV/I LlIfYL �No l'�i �iY!/ nLl!l Vl"Y ,omf W cwe,a ,C 69TH A'YVivF A' RTH 27) Y '� R � I lafx, ea�a a ----- -STO SEWER EASEMENT �E PER DOC NO 3211239 589�5709£J RM 499.80 I C) i Q A / A 1 A A/ A T l / A `> IV/ /-I , /'I /v /I / r7 n STORM SEWER EASEMENT PER DOC NO 3211239 � q A, r w�w N �.O 24 14 ` 44 r J r m C] 91 a EASEMENT DESCRIPTION TO BE VACATED r� A permanent easement for storm sewer, over, under and across the Yi South 15 feet and the West 15 feet and the North 15 feet of the n tract of land described as the North-half (ND of the West 12 acres a � of the North-half of the Northeast quarter (NNE ) of Section 33, 00 Township 119, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying within the C� plot of MARANATHA ADDITION, together with the right to enter upon -i II said easement for the purpose of constructing, servicing and S� maintaining said storm sewer, and until such time as said storm sewer is constructed second party may enter upon said premises for the purpose of deepening, extending and maintaining the present existing ditch. Li_I ! /l A/ J /"1 U lJ / / l V /V Q U STORM SEWER EASEMENT PER DOC NO 3211239 N89 5725'W 501.01 [Neff 54'O5'W] DC;V,Vr, ;fi .;1:"1T1::' I I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated t 20th day:21une SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. FASFMENT TO BE VACATED By. ]� �''�- - Mark S. Hanson, P.L.S. Minn. Lic. No. 15480 Part of Storm Sewer Easement per Document No. 3211239. S 900���� 1 East Bloomington Freeway (350)•Suite 118 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420-3435 Revised 2012015A003-ESMTVAC.dwg MLS 03/20/2012 r 952-881-2455 (Fax: 952-888-9526 2012015A003-ESMTVAC.dw9 MLS 03/07/2012 l�tli��S11rRVEYIIVG www.sunde.com 2012-015-A 593/38 T.119, R.21, S.33 Member Kay Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2012-91 1 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 2012-007 - SUBMITTED BY MARANATHA CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST CARE, INC. FOR: PRELIMINARY PLAT TH APPROVAL OF MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION-LOCATED AT 5401-5415 69 AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012-007 submitted by Maranatha Conservative Baptist Care,Inc., requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat approval of a nd l o contiguous parcels subdivision to be titled MARANATHA 2 ADDITION which is a re plat of tw P g P l located and addressed as 5401 and 5415—69t`Avenue North(Subject Site);and WHEREAS, this plat is being requested to create one lot for the benefit of the existing Maranatha Care skilled nursing and assisted living facilities on the Subject Site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on May 31, 2012 at which time a staff report and public testimony regarding the preliminary plat of MARANATHA 2nd ADDITION were received;and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission also considered under the same public hearing I the proposed Final Plat of MARANATHA 2nd ADDITION; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined during its review of the preliminary plat and final plat of MARANATHA 2nd ADDITION, that said plat is in general conformance with City of Brooklyn Center's City Code Chapter 15—Platting,and that all conditions have been or will be met by the Applicant prior to release by the City of the final plat for recording purposes; and �} WHEREAS, on May 31,2012,the Planning Commission`recommended approval of Application No.2012-007 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012=11. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota,that Planning Application No. 2012-007 submitted by Maranatha Conservative Baptist. Care, Inc., requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat of a subdivision. to be titled MARANATHA 2nd ADDITION, is hereby approved based upon the following considerations: j1. All recommendations and conditions as noted in the City Engineer's review memorandum, dated May 25, 2012 (and those related to the PUD Development/Site and Building Plan review memo of April 9,2012)shall be complied with or completed as part of any final plat approvals; i I 4 - RESOLUTION NO. 2012-91 2. Any easements to be vacated under this platting process.must be considered under separate and formal City easement vacation process, with all documentations, descriptions,and exhibits singed by a licensed surveyor; 3, The final plat shall be subject.to review and final approvals'by the City Engineer,prior to release by the City for recording purposes. 4. The final plat shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 5. No building permits shall be issued for any new buildings until the final plat has been given final approval by the City Council and filed with Hennepin County. 6. If required or asked for by the City, and updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Attorney and City Engineer for review at the time of the final plat application(within 30 days of release of the final plat). June 25 2012 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption.of the foregoing resolution was,duly seconded by member Carol Kleven and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Tim Willson, Carol Kleven, Kay Lasman, Lin Myszkowski, and Dan Ryan; and the following voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Carol Kleven introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO.-201.2-52 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval for the preliminary plan and final plat for MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION based on certain conditions as set forth in the Planning Application No. 2012-07 and Planning Commission Resolution 2012-11; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for approval of the preliminary plan and final plat for MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION as required by City Code. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center,Minnesota that the final plat for MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION is hereby approved,subject to the following conditions: 1. Conditions as previously recommended by the Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-11, and/or as revised and amended by City Council actions taken on said development's Preliminary Plan approval. 2. The final plan must incorporate the conditions of approval as indicated in the .Preliminary and Final Plat Review Memorandum dated May 25, 2012, or as required and approved by the City Engineer. 3. Previously platted and dedicated public'easements that exist that are being granted on the final plat must be released and terminated. 4. Evidence of title satisfactory to the.City Attorney and City Engineer. 5. Any other conditions as established by Hennepin County for recording of said final plat. 6. Prior to release by the City of the final, approved plat, the owner must reimburse the City the full amount of legal. fees"incurred by the City in obtaining a review or opinion of title. June 25 2012 Dat Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Lin Myszkowski and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Tim Willson, Car ol-Kleven, Kay Lasman, Lin Myszkowski, and Dan Ryan; and the following voted against the same: none; Whereupon said resolution.was declared duly,passed and adopted. Commissioner Purfei nd introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-11 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-007, SUBMITTED BY MARANATHA CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST HOME, INC., A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT APPROVALS OF MARANATHA 2ND ADDITION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5401=5415 — 69TH AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS,Planning Commission Application No. 2012-007 submitted by Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living, Inc. (PHS), acting.on behalf of Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home, Inc.,requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat approvals of a subdivision to be titled MARANATHA 2nd ADDITION,which is a replat of two contiguous lots generally located and addressed 401 and 4 69 Avenue North Subject gu g y ssed as s 5 15 (Subject Site); and WHEREAS, this plat is requested to combine two separate lots into a single lot for the overall benefit of the Maranatha Care Center campus,located on the Subject Site; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission initially held a duly called public hearing on May 17,2012,whereby this matter was tabled to the May 31,2012 meeting;and WHEREAS,at the May 31 2012 meeting, the Planning Commission reconsidered Y � g� g this matter, at which time a staff report was presented,and the public hearing was reopened to allow for public testimony regarding the preliminary plat of MARANATHA 2 ADDITION,were received; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has determined during its review of the preliminary plat and final plat materials submitted with Planning Application No. 2012-007,that said plat is in general conformance with City of Brooklyn Center's City Code Chapter 15— Platting; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2012-007 as submitted by Presbyterian Homes Housing and Assisted Living,Inc. (PHS), acting on behalf of Maranatha Conservative Baptist Home, Inc., requesting Preliminary Plat and Final Plat consideration of a new subdivision to be titled MARANATHA 2nd ADDITION,be approved based upon the following conditions: 1. All recommendations and conditions as noted in the City Engineer's review memorandum, dated May 25, . 2012 (and those related to the PUD Development/Site and Building Plan review memo of April 9, 2012) shall be complied with or completed as part of any final plat approvals; 2. Any easements to be vacated under this platting process must be considered under separate and formal City easement vacation process, with all documentations, descriptions,and exhibits singed by a licensed surveyor; 3. The final plat shall be subject to review and final approvals by the City Engineer, prior to release by the City for recording purposes. 4. The final plat shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 5. No building permits shall be issued for any new buildings until the final plat has been given final approval by the City Council and filed with Hennepin County. 6. If required or asked for by the City, and updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Attorney and City Engineer for review at the time of the final plat application (within 30 days of release of the final plat). May 31,2012 Date Chair ATTEST• Secretary NJ The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kuykendal l and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof Chair Rahn ,Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall , Parks and Schonning. and the following voted against the same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • City Council Agenda Item No. 6h • • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: August 7, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer 1170-W SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Final Plat for EVANS.NORDBY ADDITION Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the resolution approving final plat for EVANS NORDBY ADDITION. Background: The Brooklyn Center City Council approved the proposed preliminary plat based upon certain conditions (see attached conditions of approval, City Council Resolution No. 2011-171). On June 25, 2012, the City granted a nine month extension for the final plat application deadline due to property issues discovered by the County surveyor that have subsequently been resolved. The attached final plat for EVANS NORDBY ADDITION was developed and would combine the following existing properties: Parts of Lot 40, Auditor Subdivision 216 (see attached final plat). The applicant is now seeking final plat approval from the City Council. The final plat is recommended for approval subject to the conditions established by the City Engineer, conditions established by the City Attorney based on a review of an updated title commitment provided by the applicant (within the past 30 days), conditions as previously approved by the City Council, and any conditions established by Hennepin County for recording of the plat documents. Budget Issues: The applicant has paid a final plat application fee of$125 and must reimburse the City for any additional engineering,administrative, legal or other fees associated with the filing and recording of the final plat. Council Goals: Strategic: 1. We will proceed aggressively with implementation of City's redevelopment plans Ongoing: 1. We will provide streamlined, cost effective, quality services with limited resources Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safi<,inclusire community that enhances the gnalio,of'life far all people anti preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR EVANS NORDBY ADDITION WHEREAS,the Planning Commission has recommended approval for the final plat for EVANS NORDBY ADDITION based on certain conditions as set forth in the Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-02; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for approval of the final plat for EVANS NORDBY ADDITION as required by City Code. WHEREAS,the City Council granted a nine month extension to the applicant to submit the final plat application for EVANS NORDBY ADDITION as required by City Code. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center,Minnesota that the final plat for EVANS NORDBY ADDITION is hereby approved,subject to the following conditions: 1. Conditions as previously recommended by the Planning Commission Resolution Nos.2011-14 and 2012-02,and/or as revised and amended by City Council actions taken on said development's Preliminary Plan approval in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 2011-171. 2. Property owner must provide an executed and certified recorded copy of a sidewalk easement in the southwest corner of Lotl, Block 1, EVANS NORDBY ADDITION. 3. Evidence of title satisfactory to the City Attorney and City Engineer. 4. Any other conditions as established by Hennepin.County for recording of said Final Plat. 5. Prior to release by the City of the final, approved plat, the owner must reimburse the City the full amount of legal fees incurred by the City in obtaining a review or opinion of title. August 13, 2012 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member carol Kleven introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2011-171 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE DISPOSITION AND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO."2011-019, A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF EVANS NORDBY ADDITION SUBMITTED BY THOMAS J. WEBER ON BEHALF OF T.J. WEBER PROPERTIES,LLC 'WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No.2011-019 submitted by Thomas L Weber on behalf of T.J.Weber Properties,LLC requesting approval of a Preliminary.Plat approval of a subdivision to be titled .Evans Nordby Addition, which is a replat of three contiguous parcels generally located and addressed as 6000 Brooklyn Boulevard;and WHEREAS, this plat is being requested to create one lot for the benefit of the existing Evans-Nordby Funeral Home business located at 6000 Brooklyn Boulevard;and WHEREAS; the.Planning Commission held a duly "called public hearing on November 17,2011 at which time a staff report and public testimony regarding the preliminaryplat of Evans Nordby Addition were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined `during its review of this preliminary plat submitted with Planning Application No. 2011-019, that said plat is in general., conformance with City of Brooklyn Center's City Code Chapter 15-Platting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No. 2011-019by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No.2011-14 on November17,2011;and WHEREAS, the City Council considered same Application No. 2014-019 at its November 28,2011 regular meeting;and in light of all testimony received the Planning Commission's recommendations. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center,Minnesota,that Planning Application No.2011-019 submitted by Thomas L Weber on behalf of T.J.Weber Properties, LLC requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat of a subdivision to be titled Evans Nordby Addition,is hereby approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The final plat shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. .2. The final plat shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. RESOLUTION NO. 2011-171 3. The Owner/Applicant shall provide an updated certified abstract or title or registered property report to the City Attorney and City Engineer for review at time of final plat application. 4. The Owner/Applicant shall provide a 10-foot drainage and utility easement on all exterior lot lines. 5. The Owner/Applicant shall provide an additional sidewalk easement as illustrated on the revised plan set prepared by K.K.Design,dated 12/05/2011. Said easement shall be dedicated on the final plat or provided for under separate recordable document. 6. The Owner/Applicant shall remove the bituminous driveway section as illustrated on the K.K. Design plans (dated 12/05/2011), and install the landscaping and sod as indicated. Until.the City repairs the sidewalk and removes the driveway apron in the right-of-way,the Owner/Applicant shall install a temporary barricade post with chain and/or planters to prevent vehicles from using the driveway access onto 60`h Avenue North near this location. December 12 2011 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the.adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Dan Ryan and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: , Tim Willson, Carol Kleven, .Kay Lasman, and Dan Ryan; and the following voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. E VANS NORDB Y ADDITION C,R. D0C. "°do IQiOW dLL PCR30N9 BY THESE PRESENTS: TheL Tl Febar Properties,LLC,a Minveadte limited lnbility comyeny,owner of lha fotiowfug ducribed P-P-ty I Rmk of Nenume ts,thet this plot t lea oomepottrepreepenWltan of the bounndary auivey athei ell maitRemetwel dote evdyleb..n-onrre<tly Geayneted on Th.North'18.64 Teat M the South 598.48 feet of Iat 40,.md the North 48.84 feet of the South 43984 feet of 1st 40 Auditors Subdivbion No.218; the plat.lbat ail.monuments depicted on the plat have been.or will ba<.rrecuy set to one leer:that ell water d thot lit and wet lends ae defined Nttmepb County,Ylnneaote measured along the Eaet line of saitl Lot and with the North end South lives parallel to the SOUth Ilne oI veld lnt. i Mi eeate 3Letutae.Section 50301,Subtl.3.es of the date of fhb certificate ereehaan end labeled ov the plat,end that dl public ways are shown BEC6PT eli Lhet yeM of the following described tract:The.North 15326 f..t of the South 53848 feM M Lot 40,Audiidr•e Subdtvulon No.St., end totaled on the plat. in—d on the Feel Une of sa/tl tot and with the North end South...parall i L th S th line of said lot.of five Sou.C-3 eriy of a line n pamllei with end dbtavt 42 feet Northeasterly of the fO1loMOg described tin ito point on the North line o[Se<tlon 3,Townahlp 116 North - — Range 2t WeA dbtant 174E 08 feet Weet of the Northeeat corner thereof,run South [ ly et art angle of 88 degree»Ol minutes fit 3 ucontle with Rick N BIOm ticenaed land Surveyor _n North sectlon tine for 104.54 feat:Lhenee dMIeM to the right et an angle of l7 d g sea 20 in—352 ltoonda for 63692 feet to the point of Yfn.—lac 1 No.21729 beginning of the lne to be dascnbed,thence rvn Nertbwasterly along the teat d Abed course foe 200 feet,thence deflect to the left on e 2 degree 00 minute curve(delta angle 17 degrees 20 mlvutee 96.2 eeconde)for 087.16 feat end thtte terminnting;together Mth a trtanguter pieoe edjom�ng end Hortheneterly of the above described strip and Sout0.wea+nrly of the folowing dweribed tiny.Beginning at n povR on the Northeasterly bwandary State of Nitmeaota,County of of the above deeertbed ttp.diatom 20 fut N"thwasterly.of Ito intersection 'th the South Nne of Lhe above deecFlDed traM;thence run -- Sovlheeeterly to e.point o eeid South tine.dirtavt EO feet Enaterly of avid intersection. Th..(n—bnoot was acknowledged before me on LNe___—_day of_�— ---•by Rick N.Blom. The North 76.64(eat of the South 613.12 feM of I.ot 40.Auditor's 9ubdiNMOrt No.218,-measured on the EeM Nne of ebid lot end Mth the North ___—__—_____,_—Signature end South lines pareilal to the South tine of eeid la: Prnted— Excepting therefrom that pert of uid tm t whioh yea Saulhwanterly Of n line run perMlel with end dbtant 42 feet Northeasterly of the following _—____County,Minnesota Notay Pubiie,____- tlesoribatl line From n point on Ne SblN line of Section 34,T—iimp 119 North,Range 21 Welt.d ,t 1741.08 feel West of the Southeast corner thereof.run My commission eapiroe:____---- Northwent-ly el m angb of 88 degre-01 minutes 62.3 uconds Mth eeid South..Uon tine for 432.98 teat to the point of beginning.f the tine to be described:thence run Southaarteriy slang the lest described<ouru for 100 feM:thence deflect to the right on a 2 degree 00 minute curve(delta - avgle'17 degree.20 minute 33.2...onto)for 88.1.18(vet end there termNeting. BROOKLYN CENTER,YINNRSOTA AND Thin plot of VMS NORDET ADDITTON wee nppr.d end accepted by Lhe City Conned of the City of Brooklyn Cent-,Ybneaeta el a regular meeting Wt 40.Auditors 9ubdivfalen No.218,lying North of the Sloth 813.12(-t thereof measured on the @sat Ill-of eMd tat; thereof hdd fhb tley a(_ _,20—__If applicable,.tba written comments snd reoomm.ndallo it of the lipt of h of Trane fhWdOn snd the County Highway Engineer have been rernivM by the City or the pr-mfbed 3(i day period five eloped wlthovt reMpt of such EzmpWe therefrom Lhet part M veld t_C which till Soulhweet-ly of a line run parallel with and--t 42 feel N-Lheesterly M the lollowin6 comet nts end reeommendntbna,ea provided by Yinn.9LStut-,8eMlon 505.03,gubd.S. deecrlbedd line: CITY COMM OF BROOELYN CSNTE'R.YRfNESOTA Pram a polvl on the South U.of 9eMlon U.Township 119 North.Range 21 Weal,diatom 1734.87 feM RM of Lhe South—earner thereof,run NoMhl.,ly el av.angle of 67 tape-Sfi mlvat-06 a—onds with Wd South a-UOn Ww I-434.8 feet-the l`—t of b"itining M the Ill-to be —•Yey- dii—lbed;thence run--ttloobi rly ably the Ill,dewribed course for loo feM;thevm dM1aM to the right on a 2 degree 00 minute Iona(delta by-------- angle 17 degrees 20 minutia 35.2 eeconde)for 867.18 teal sM there termiwMing. by Manes- . the dreinege end utility eueeman,ee oreet dtt-this PANS NORDBY ADDTTION end tloea hereby dedicate to the public for public uu the public way end l. TA AYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT,Hennepin County,Mill-lots in Mtneu whereof said TJ Weber Properties.LLC.a Mhmeeota limited liabiifty comp fine--d thee.preeente to be signed by ill proper officer fhb - 1 hereby certify that taxes payable in 20___end prior yeere Rave been paid(or lend described en this plat. Dated W.__—__day of ------day M----------- TJ WEBER PROPERTIES,LLC Nark V.Chapio,County Auditor by—___------—------ _D<P-ty Thomas d.Faber.Chlaf M neger------- SN3VEY DMSION H hePln'COUnty.Mymesote Pursvent to NWN.STAT.See.383R.686(1989).this plot hoe been approved fhb---day of SO—_ STATE OF MINNESOTA - COUNTY OR____—_—_____ .Willem P.Brown,County Surveyor by This 1nMiumevt wee acknowledged before me on Lhe------—__daY of__—________----•20----•by Thomas J.Weber,Chief Naneger of IN Weber Properties,L]•C.n.Ninn.sota ymited linbility company. COUNTY RECORDER.H—Pin County.Minne..to Signature i bereby-e Iy that the within plat of EYANS NORDSy ADDITION wm recorded in this office this_---day of o'clock--. Printed Name Notary Public,_--__ __County,Sitnnee— Rachel Smith,eotiM Covnty Recorder by --Deputy My oommbalen Oliver Surveying&Engineering,Ina SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS PDxTa�DxNx<--/� :$,DW.�DEDxMx° EVANS NOR'DBY ADDITION C.R. °°° "° /a JaT.P. sx 2 „n.� — aew _ --------------- ' ,G� ��s�H T 1 e wnx - co..<i cooi ren umxmml Y���nr w q as2J PART OF LOT Z57 TRACT A n0. 2"5 I R.L. 19' I 'J -------- -- — 589°56'21"E 315.25 \ GRAPHIC SCALE r__ ___________-______ 58426 1_ , j JO.OD \ I 30 0 15 30 80 v— I 1 xe a1 u1 a.a,at a 2 111 II$ I 1 I I s° I sa I �'L I �aA6 11 SCAU III FEET J I g I N'9'32'S9'E\ �1 x mRw or a.wm xx2 x 8.22v� I -- 1 o1 Lm uj wa1'sea_ L arTx11 21,I�Ne N.DCUSEO tl A I za` � I TWP.114 RNG 21,IS AssuxeD TO eEAE oIII 1I � Q�'1 1 a I t x ! N.191�>'oe•W..� Ij III I $ 11 'Y /\ii i rr«e1° - 1 aea nawws°i\` • Q 1 'C OO DENOTES A HEMNEPIN DDUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT T i'&� \ 0 ORWTES A I/2 INOH 9Y N INCH R MWiUAENT I / ietw aae`we NO.° p CJ I � 3\ WITH A PLASTIC PLUG STAMPED R.LS.21>29 I ' y _'92. / Lot a°,.wat✓.sma xo. 1 G Q w C3 , • DENOTES A EDUND RON PIPE I 1 Y m J 1 / sw xn O_ or Ln x° 9 e wat lire–�\ 47 °r I NJ•' ONANIAGE AN0 UTILITY EASEMENTS APE SHOWN I < i t CJ 1 I CJ THUS: $ o O 11 I�_ x g1, .. re r 1 __ s Eon H. _ 1 _ (NOT TO So" Ip D.•C EENIC 10 iEET IN WIDTH AND PDJOINIHG D. PoOHT-OF-WAY LINFS ALCO BEWD S r`EET IN 3 WIDTH AND SIC NTED,AST LINES,ON THE PLAT. III I i I 1 'E �' m.�Lm.��ze _� L o I IRL-.: f NA�4 J'Y! \ I , e1 ue EauT-- I I I o01 or — I III l a1�. x..21n 30.01 — I 56.1119W'i 262.81.or soea.,ae za– �'• `–E%LEPTON O II I ok, m TEEN' ADDITION ea x.21 ---- ---------- / re —————————--1 xnn•s= •E xrea�•2n<n•E Hx1 Oliver Surveying&Engineering,Inc. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS City Council Agenda Item No. 9a 1 • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM . DATE: August 13, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey,City Manager FROM: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist THROUGH: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development .'� ' SUBJECT: Resolution Regarding the Recommended Disposition of Planning Application No. 2012-010—Submitted by Loren Van Der Slik(Gatlin Development Company)for Approval of a Planned Unit Development(PUD) Amendment to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council, following consideration of this planning application item, adopt the Resolution Regarding the Recommended Disposition of Planning Application No. 2012-010— Submitted by Loren Van Der Slik(Gatlin Development Company)for Approval of a Planned Unit Development(PUD)Amendment to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. Background: • On August 2,2012 the Planning Commission considered Planning Commission Application No. 2012-010 submitted by Loren Van Der Slik (Gatlin Development Company) PUD Amendment approval (1300 Shingle Creek Crossing). Attached for review is the Planning Commission Report 2012-010 with certain maps and attachments related to this request item. Also attached is Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-16, in which the Commission provided a favorable recommendation (by 5-1 vote) of the PUD Amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing project. Excerpts from the August 2, 2012 Commission meeting minutes, as related to this consideration of this matter,are also attached. Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Council Goals: Strategic: 1. We will proceed aggressively with implementation of City's redevelopment plans. 4. We will improve the city's image. • Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-010 SUBMITTED BY ` LOREN VAN DER SLIK (FOR GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT TO THE 2011 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PUD. WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center adopted City Resolution No. 2011-85, dated June 13, 2011, which approved the establishment of the original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an approved Development/Master Plan and certain allowances and development standards that would govern over the PUD; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center subsequently adopted City Resolution No. 2011-127, dated September 12, 2011, which approved the first amendment to the original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company (Applicant)submitted Planning Application No. 2012-010, which proposes a second amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, by allowing certain changes to the • approved 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development;and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends additional adjustments not approved under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development and the related 2011 PUD Agreement,which are noted as follows: 1) Revise Building B (Lot 8, Block 1, SCC) from an original proposed bank/financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use, as new labeled Building C and 2) Reconfiguration of original labeled Building C (Lot 11, Block 1, SCC) from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food with drive thru service and retail uses, as new labeled Building G. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on August 2, 2012, whereby a staff report and public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development Amendment were received and considered by the Planning Commission;the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development Amendment request in light of all testimony received, including the guidelines for evaluating such amendments as contained in Section 35=355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan;and WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center • RESOLUTION NO i did determine that Planning Application No. 2012-010, as submitted by Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company, may be approved based upon the following findings and considerations: A. The Planned Unit Development Amendment is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. B. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. C. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's.Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. D. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this development can be considered . an asset to the community. E. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating Planned Unit Development Amendment as contained in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal 'is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-16, which provides a favorable recommendation to the City Council that Planning Application No. 2012-010, as submitted by Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company,requesting an Amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, by allowing certain changes to the approved 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, be approved based upon the following conditions: 1. Allow the revision of original Building B (Lot 8, Block 1 Shingle Creek Crossing), from the original proposed bank/financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use,to be relabeled as Building C. 2. Allow the reconfiguring original Building C (Lot 11; Block 1, SCC) from . a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food restaurant with drive thru service and retail use,to be relabeled as Building G. RESOLUTION NO. • 3. Allowances for these new Building C and G layouts are conditioned on the Applicant/Developer submitting a new plat (replat) of the new lot and block configurations, as illustrated on the June 28, 2012 PUD plan sets, and shall reflect in general conformance with the updated Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 3, dated June 2012. 4. The overall approval of the Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No, 3, dated June 2012, is not being recognized as an approved or final updated master plan at this time. The Applicant/Developer will be required to submit under a future PUD Amendment application request the acceptance and adoption of an updated master plan, which plan shall govern the planned and future redevelopment areas of this site. 5. The approval of these lot reconfigurations shall be made under separate plat application, with final plat approval by the City Engineer and City Council; 6. All existing provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall apply to these sites comprehended under this planning application (No. 2012-010) and all shall remain in effect for the entire Shingle Creek Crossing PUD project site. 7. Execution of a PUD Amendment agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center,Minnesota, that the findings and considerations to comprehend the approval of Planning Application No. 2012-010 as determined by the Planning Commission are hereby accepted, and the request for an Amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development by allowing certain changes to the approved 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, is also hereby approved and subject to the same conditions memorialized in this resolution. August 13, 2012 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk • • RESOLUTION NO. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • 2011 Master Plan (approved May 23, 2011) 014- - ��' �� �' �'•av'et"''rte �_,w.'S� ���" a � . .• � ,, m If IF 06 01 -` 'booQ� 000 0000 00 O0mW 0 000 0_ 1 OOJOOJ C 70 ' COUNTY ROAD Nd 10 ---------- - PROPOSED PYLON SIGN O� Q .� '`�., lS •+• •• '� —FRO POSEO PYLON SIGN �PROPOSED TAONUMENT ' SIGN "r.J . .- r—PROPOSED MONUIGEYT I -: ;o'; wo ..t W0,11, _ I / ! •• +.° 'y�.,m. ,�, wy ',� !� n e � ES ND WALL" !L' A A�j }'. Y. IMPROVFMFNTS' O ,.4 �PROPOSF.DSNIN[d. CREEK REGIUN/LLTIL IT '� R I 4 TN �', �,w �. . yFP ��• _ �-61RFCitrlNrJ I ` " '' ,t. ` +IV 40 _ _ 1 I 1 SHINGLE DOAYLIf,HTED - 4� �'- ..�� AA 1* y SHINGLE CREEK N +�y •�{ ' i _dam _ 'v+ - t,� KIN RAIN GAR OfN 7 Y (�. ,� (, ° TRAIL CONNECTION-`.�•,j; (TYP),�... • sa°a L TO F)OSi1NGRRIDGF 3 SIGN E=Teq � \ . - Walmart3;C \ d� - ST'OJS(I auzsm s Q aiao-saL.ra A IILI � � tH."3 S-(APPROL) ? .ate �' _! EXISTING Sill I¢LE . Q ,' CRFFKFIOK CULVERT ,. PROPOSFDFFIFFWAY ° - PYLON SIGN . klirannoN AREA mr, c.,sTS5 i 'It. �; ' o SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN ..ti -op , J ; t , MASTER PLAN TYa'i� ✓ - A PROPOSED rr.Eev;o MAY 2011 AVO PYL JN SIGNapy N o. 1 ////���_,, ` 14 �6' � �� � 0 2R 40 120 OFT W �yP 'k�S 'I 'I- ,� E.1 ' Kimley-Horn •+ GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and Associates, Inc. NOTE. ImamanMR, S— IMPROVFMFNTS TO STARS PARCFt IS NOT PART OF THIS PUD AND D.*—T-4701. ARE SUBJECT TOCRT APPROVAL Tel 613-L16-11 W Updated Master Plan (approved September 12, 2011) • �. .1 - � ' "+'•+rN'+nZ� O r . 77 �' '= ,'b 1? �r".�� Z'�.' .•'�QQ .r Ntw,m ,�. „rte^ COUNTY ROAD IdQ"f0 n r Q�•Q- r-fR Ytl3 f! rr_v_ . 'r .; :- _ a�+ �f�r+hsEUr••wr. f04 a ,r�ulrEa-----.� � _ _ - 1I ' •� ,/�p�°,� � �{y �• I`, ,.. Pfe.I'•]� '�KrY_..E� � ' . j` � 1wG ±y: ��� � � !�y i�•#1� w i f � �_.EErcrm�'xct."fcsr. '�� >, 1- y - 1'✓, ! ,� + '., ,�� ._ ( � —_nFCPU-EUA►•l ED s lQC^r mil` � �1 N �•`� ;TYPI ;,,� ,� - i t�• TG EiUST-rC SFrCti:f_ ` %' ir '10 _..lwT� 41kr'` fir. .� �� c�•w.. _ ` r r SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN MASTER PLAN '�,. y .• r' ' No. 2 Fucusi:.1r,t, 4 —11 KWey-Horn - a GATLIN DEVELOPMENT CONIPAW and Associates, Inc. 1- " • 1VA1_W%ffr-4-:1X95 FY.F.C_3 K-M,T f;1W,PXQV aebx rmnre ne. i ht'51A.1 C 1:Qf`!,/Nrr7Yll'. ar s.H;.rrrw Ark I 0000 w Cb tr Lu 00' _v - < 1• 1. nr,i\INI/'I/f.l\tgl.rr..n .. r� ' �0 000_0 O �_/nj l.A./�!• 2- . --_.-_._.. 000 _ ___..000 _ ..___ __ PYLON SIGN¢ Op�O' rY LO '-- CO NCS'70 - v •' —MONUMENT SIGN � �r •' •f�Jf. {�j'�'. PYLON SIGN MONUMENT SIGN -.-. -.--..-••�------ .+c--- ...mw� �_ • ' M NT SIGN �`wiy1, _ - _+J�-0--V - — _-- /'_ ._ �_- CT4 r .� � PROPOSED SHINGLE ��CC77 ` CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL •y am Y C . DIRECTIONAL PP / t'• 'SIGN .� I I t EXISTING.OAVLIGHTEO, w'i� ,+'�w SHINGLE CREEK �+p •t� ` •. , \ �/�e, fp - \` I: —TRAIL CONNECTION 'e N N`• /",. TO EXISTING OR IDGE / '.•�'` ¢y,. PVLO(1 SIGH _ f ��. ae• - �%/ .` r`\ �.•T I- / � PROPOSEDADDITIONAL I' t V r 'f SHINGLE+CRFeEK DAYLIGHTING*;. \ /�'b�S��Q Walmart /r : �• ` c ' �• ^ Iljy-- �+ EXISTING SHINS.LE CREEK BOX CUL1w, I rA •'1Q� C rfl I I II^-I f 1/{ FREEWAY PYLON SIGN„ EXISTING �f5!♦I''•�t �. �' . FILTRATION AREA(TYR) a 10— a�� �• `1 POTENTUI > SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SEPARATION'S .•�\ •`o G,rLGTA -•: .a BROOKLYN CENTER, MN M•, \ FREEWAY PYLON SIGN y MASTER PLAN r !� No 3 JUNE 2012 so 120 M IIIIIIIIIIII, �' - } t 7111► .iT /I�,IIr" :'• �SV I_ _, .• •" � .•��,;r;�y=- � � Kimley-Horn GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and Associates,Inc. �/�•''��///yyy�__`�_ I1�•, ' � f r � IOI SouN Mein Slrcct !"■ R �+t; 40 7 . w ry Ti:61n,Tenn104 37033 - ♦\, r 615.4&710 fex:613"446]I03 • • • ------ - - ------------- =4 COUNTY RD NO 101 BASS _LAKE RD� ------ ----- 11----�- -s� - ETAIL. ---------- REVISED BUILDING -AI IVE-THRE ------------- It ii%I --- ----- - % ftiii! NA EXISTING rom-s 'x L 52 0�a �AAL WINQI V\ 04\ \L U$ i,W-A A 41 x, SYMBOL LEGEND' -10 EXISTING BUILDING 169.555 Sr APPROXJ Lu EL D U. EXPANDED PARTIAL IN I DAYLIGHnNG SIGN LEGEN01. o LU i.- c) m p z Lu Clow 01 U)LU a) FP (L a W SITE DATA TABLE i 17 z k /POT04L loµ W cn U.1 Areas Covered by PUD Amendment z UJI uj L) W z �A Areas Not w/this< PUD Amendment C.) Areas to be Re-Platted in the future ........ F w >1 0 0 C �..W, 2- Zk IS fit ?x 3: z NORTH rn.4k/1 1 06/28/2012 'v mow _18M33Wl B TMNBER PILID AMENDMENT No.27 'A w , ur ✓ K ,�P-RD A p a - COUNTY RD NO 10 13A SS I AKF ROAD •r l_ — COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD_ 2 t// —�`- � II n� �r� ��1 \,�1A ^! ,�1 �` ►UQ woo �j a �' /� ��s F \ C��� ��1 1 t� � t N1 •� E � .'C'y/ ���y�\ \ ������\��"t.�a/�� � Qc�! APPLr BrI NG'-.( \. \ \ \ `\t` ' \ \ E � \ 11 IN R y ah IN /,' NE FEET j v CL LU �j /I r PHASING HATCH LEGEND: o w w I II U PHASE I— COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS LU O Q 2 W EL PHASE II d W i t I I L a •�%� PHASE III — FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS z z AREA NOT TO BE DISTURBED DURING / so CONSTRUCTION W 9�ORMNNTER � � �i` F z LLU v ';l \��. �;�' � ��� I It�b `,-'/ , f�•= ''',� = R �TMH� r R..ER �z 11L­A1111 1U1I—TA I t?, 1V+ �j 'a�.• '' � RBTR�q� ` ,/ � GOPHER STATE CALL ONE W Y NV►ART\GPTHiISU Y� ✓"f= N—FREE 800 253 1166 Z ynVC tl; (}^ 1`, ' ` 1 i .)i S ///v�/ f� TNNOEITY AREAfiSt��aSa 0002 C7 0 - u Q �;�,�•i'•�'\ 1��i C'r F-'i=1s`i�`\` \\`,` }\��`'•• I.Y�rl1t1�1f4,r•\���f�.I��if"�'r`.�j'�I,:1'�''t rC"y 1(1 l{h'`?f y.l'lJ�"'f\►//1'"/'////.�F"/--/�/,°//� e[aauanFa Bl V eS: /E EU1aFs U%w.ieho'rie m i 1e ALERT TO CONTRACTOR fwo 060 wr mC) ACTI 11 11 M11 14%A1 Aunurs T RE—E.— o� I'm of BROOA h' CFSTRR • Application Filed on 06/26/2012 City Council action should be Planning Commission Report taken by 08/25/12(60 Days) Meeting Date: August 2,2012 Application No. 2012-010 Applicant: Loren Van Der Slik- Gatlin Development Company Location: Shingle Creek Crossing Request: Planned Unit Development—Amendment No. 2 INTRODUCTION Gatlin Development Company is requesting a planned unit development (PUD) amendment to the previously approved Shingle Creek Crossing PUD redevelopment plans. The original (submitted) amendment consisted of a number of changes or additions (as noted on the attached public hearing notice), which were subsequently reduced at the request of the Applicant, to only consider the following two amendment items: 1) Revise Building B (Lot 8) from an original proposed bank/financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use (as new Bldg. C); and • 2) Reconfiguration of original Bldg. C from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food with drive thru service and retail use (as new Building G—Lot 1, Blk. 2), The original Shingle Creek Crossing PUD was approved on May 23, 2011, and was subsequently amended (Amendment No. 1) on September 12, 2011. These original and amended plans are attached as Master Plan No. 1, dated May 2011 and Master Plan No. 2, dated August 2011. An updated master plan, labeled Master Plan No. 3 and dated June 2012 is also included as part of this report and provides a general illustration of these proposed amendments. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (AMENDMENTS) I. Revise Bldg. B (Lot 8)from an original proposed bankTnancial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use (as new Bldg. C) The updated Plan No. 3 'provided by the Developer illustrates a change to the original Building B pad site to a new Building C layout. Building B was originally proposed as a 9,100 sq. ft. building, with a typical drive-thru lane service feature. Preliminary plans for this site were as a future bank or financial services type business. • App.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 1 ACCESS • a`TRAFFIC SIGNAL RO1�V DEDICATION 4Mt1,DTH V&RTES) y .r 20' BUILDING SETBACK 15' ROW DED 7i BUILDI ,1 DRIVE- RU li O�G♦ ETBP S '• 9,100sf 45.000sf `" 1 ` LOT 88 BLbCK 1 BLOCK - \�' / LOT 7, LOT 10;:- 1,410sf BLOCK BLOCK 1 _ iL��7 '1'•--- i `DIRECTi0-NAt-SJGN- SITE DATA TABLE BUILDING PARKING PARKING DESCRIPTION LEGAL LOT AREA BUILDING REQ'D PROVIDED RATIO • B Lot 8,Block 1 1.21 acres 9,100 sf. 41 spaces 41 spaces 4.51 The amendment requests a significant reduction of this building from 9,100 sf. retail/service use to a 2,488 sf. restaurant, along with a continuation of the drive-thru service lane. The lot size is also being reduced from 1.21 acres down to 0.85 acres. The restaurant site is also changing from its originally designed 41 spaces (ratio of 4.51 spaces per 1,000 s£ GFA) to only 27 spaces (ratio of 10.85 spaces per 1,000 GFA). Under the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreement, buildings are allowed to be reduced (from their original approved size indications) and all restaurants or eating establishments must attain or exceed 10 spaces per 1,000 sf. of GFA. The restaurant pad is also proposed to have a small outdoor patio area for its patrons. • App.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 2 I DRIVE-THRU - - 20' BUILDING SETBACK EXISTING SIDEWALK M -- Al 11,200sf SMALL O OCK RETAIL 38,000sf LOT 3, OT 5; - LOCK 1 SITE DATA TABLE BUILDING PARKING PARKING • DESCRIPTION LEGAL LOT AREA BUILDING REQ'D PROVIDED RATIO C Lot 4,Block 1 0.85 acres 2,488 sf. 25 spaces 27 spaces 10.85 Although "restaurants" were identified as an allowable use under the original PUD Agreement between Gatlin Development and the City, along with agreeable standards for parking areas, it was understood that most of these sites (i.e. Buildings A, E and M) were planned to be a "sit-down style" restaurants, and not necessarily a convenience-food type facility. Moreover, convenience food restaurants with drive-up facilities are allowed under the prevailing C-2 —Commerce district by means of a special use permit. In some cases, the PUD [amendment] application can substitute as the typical special use permit process. • App.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 3 i 2. Reconfiguration of original Bldg. C from a retail use to a new m&eduse of convenience • food with drive thru service and retail use (as new Building G—Lot 1, Blk. 2), Building C under the May/Sept. 2011 Master Plans indicate the proposed development as a 12,225 sf. single user/multi-tenant retail building, on a 1.44 acre lot, with 55 parking spaces or a 4.5 parking ratio. ACCESS COUNTY RD NO 10/BASS LAKE RD FFIC SIGNAL = ' PARRANG O; SETBACK WITH DECORATIVE 15' ROW DEDICATION FENCING I og�f 15' , ' .. BUILDI 1 SETBA K� (C `� 6,17 `a 12,225sf ' I LOT 11, BLOCK 1 _ LOT BLOC The proposed PUD amendment requests the building to be reduced to 8,420 sf. of mixed • restaurant/retail service use, with 63 parking spaces (7.48 ratio), while slightly increasing the lot to 1.45 acres. The amendment also requests the allowance of a new drive-thru service lane to the end-cap restaurant user. Staff has knowledge of this proposed restaurant user and has deemed this use to be a convenience food type restaurant use as well. DRIVE-THRU I O 8,420sf BLOCK 2 L K a • App.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 4 • ANALYSIS & FINDINGS If these two sites were individual or stand-alone developments under a typical C-2 Commerce district area, a special use permit would be needed in order to allow for such convenience food type uses. However, when determining the appropriateness of a convenience food restaurant under an existing or established PUD, the City may elect to ,allow or permit such uses under a typical PUD Amendment process, as is being done under this particular application. Moreover, the same standards used for determining or granting special use :permits may be considered, which are noted under Zoning Code Sect. 35-220; Subpar. 2. Standards for Special Use Permits, as follows: a. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. b. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. C. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. . d. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress and parking so designed as to minimize traffic con g estion in the public streets. e. The special use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. Since original Bldg. B was approved under the May 2011 and September 2011 PUD Plans as a use with a drive-thru lane, Staff does not object to continuing this feature or activity for the proposed restaurant use. For all intents and purposes, the transition of Bldg. B from a 9,100' sf. service use to a new Bldg. C, a much smaller 2,488 sf. convenience food restaurant use does still promote and enhances the general public welfare of this PUD, as it maintains and keeps the redevelopment activity of this site intact and ongoing, it reflects a current need or benefit to the Site as requested by the Developer, and this development will not be a detriment or danger to the public. Furthermore,the use should not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other uses in this PUD; should not impede the normal orderly development and proposed improvements of this PUD; adequate measures have or will be taken to provide suitable access to the site. Staff believes the final (future) site plan approval of this Bldg. C pad site will provide a feasible solution to any potential access issues, traffic and pedestrian circulation, and trash enclosure details. The transition of original Bldg. C to new Bldg. G is considerable. Bldg. C was approved • under the May 2011 and September 2011 PUD Plans as a stand-alone or multi-tenant retail APP.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 5 building use, with no drive-thru lanes. Even with these changes, Staff does not object to • allowing or permitting a drive thru feature as part of this proposed (amended) restaurant use. The transition of Bldg. G to a new 8,400 s£ mixed-use restaurant and retail use promotes and enhances the general public welfare of this PUD, as it maintains and keeps the redevelopment activity of this site intact and ongoing, it reflects a current need or benefit to the Site as requested by the Developer, and this development will not be a detriment or danger to the public. Furthermore, the use should not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other uses in this PUD; should not impede the normal orderly development and proposed improvements of this PUD; adequate measures have or will be taken to provide suitable access to the site. This Bldg. G is subject to separate Site Plan review and consideration following this application matter. A number of comments or issues related to access issues, traffic and pedestrian circulation, and trash enclosure details have been noted by city staff in this separate Site Plan report; and should not preclude the approvals of allowing Bldg. G as proposed under this new PUD Master Plan and amendment application. REPLATTING ISSUES The changes made to these two building pad sites will also include future modifications to the original platted property lines of these respective lots. The changes proposed under new Bldg. C affect the original lot lines (layouts) for original Lots 3, 4, 5 and 10, Block 1 of Shingle Creek Crossing. Similarly, the changes proposed under new Bldg. G will require slight modifications' to the original Lots 11, 12, and 13, Bock 1 of SCC. These specific lot changes and other lot • modifications to be made throughout this PUD site, are to be considered under a separate,future re-plat application by Gatlin Development. Under approvals comprehended herein, conditions will be added that relate to these plat changes, both preliminary and final plats, which must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No.2011-16,which comprehends the approval of Planning Application No. 2012-010,which proposes a Planned Unit Development(PUD)Amendment to allow changes to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, subject to the following conditions and allowances: L Allow the revision of original Building B (Lot 8, Block 1 Shingle Creek Crossing),from an original proposed bank/financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive- thru.service use,to be relabeled as Building C. 2. Allow the reconfiguring original Building C from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food restaurant with drive thru service and retail use, to be relabeled as Building G. 3. Allowances for these new Building C and G layouts are conditioned on the Applicant/Developer submitting a new plat (replat) of the new lot and block • App.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 6 configurations, as illustrated on the June 28, 2012 PUD plan sets, and shall reflect in • general conformance with the updated Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 3, dated June 2012. 4. The overall approval of the Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 3, dated June 2012, is not being recognized as an approved or final updated master plan at this time. The Applicant/Developer will be required to submit under a future PUD Amendment application request the acceptance and adoption of an updated master plan, which'plan ' shall govern the planned and future redevelopment areas of this site. 5. The approval of these lot reconfigurations shall be made under separate plat application, with final plat approval by the City Engineer and City Council, 6. All existing provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek gP p g Crossing PUD shall apply to these sites comprehended under this planning application (No. 2012-010) and all shall remain in effect for the entire Shingle Creek Crossing PUD project site: 7. Execution of a PUD Amendment agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. Attachments ■ Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 1 (May 2011) • _ Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No.2(August 2011) Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No.3 (June 2012) ■ June 28,2012 PUD Amendment Plan Set APP.No.2012-010 PC 08/02/2012 Page 7' • NOTICE OF HEARING ON PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held by the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center on the 2nd of August, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD)Amendment for the property described as follows: Legal Description: Lots 8, 11, 12, 13, 16 and 17, Block 1, Shingle Creek Crossing Addition This property is more commonly described as 1300 Shingle Creek Crossing. Said proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment has been submitted by Loren Van Der Slik to amend the previously approved Planned Unit Development for Shingle Creek Crossing(dated September 12,2011). This amendment includes the following changes: 1) revise Bldg. B (Lot 8) from an original proposed bank/financial use to anew convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use(as new Bldg. C); 2) replatting of Lots 11, 12 and 13 into four new lots (Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4,Block 2) • and which includes: a. reconfiguring original Bldg. C from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food with drive thru service and retail use (as new Building G— Lot 1, Blk. 2), b. reconfiguring original retail Bldg. D (Lot 11) into two new convenience food restaurants with drive thru services (new Buildings I and D - Lots 2 and 3, Blk. 2, respectively); and c. revise Bldg. E (Lot 13) from an original restaurant use to a new retail use (Bldg. E - Lot 4, Blk. 2); 3) replatting of Lots 16 and 17 into four new proposed lots(Lots 1,'2, 3 and 4, Block 3) and which includes: a. the reduction of original Bldg. Q from a 35,680 sf. retail store to a new 6,000 sf. restaurant use (Lot 3,Block 3) , b. the addition of new 7,500 sf. restaurant use(new Bldg. 0- Lot 2,Blk. 3), and c. the additional day-lighting of the Shingle Creek waterway and related features (Lot 4, Blk. 3). Dated: July 18, 2012 Tim Benetti Planning Commission Secretary • Member Leino introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 2012-16 RESOLUTION REGARDING RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-010 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK (FOR GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT TO THE 2011 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PUD WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center adopted City Resolution No. 2011-85, dated June 13, 2011, which approved the establishment of the original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development,and which included an approved Development/Master Plan and certain allowances and development standards that would govern over the PUD;and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center subsequently adopted City Resolution No. 2011-127, dated September 12, 2011, which approved the first amendment to the original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master'Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company (Applicant) submitted Planning Application No. 2012-010, which proposes a second amendment • to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, by allowing certain changes to the approved 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends additional adjustments not approved under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development and the related 2011 PUD Agreement,which are noted as follows: 1) Revise Building B (Lot 8, Block 1, SCC) from an original proposed bank/financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use, as new labeled Building C; and 2) Reconfiguration of original labeled Building C 11, Block 1, SCC) from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food with drive thru service and retail uses, as new labeled Building G. WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on August 2, 2012, whereby a'staff report and public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development Amendment were received and considered by the Planning Commission;the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development Amendment request in light of all testimony received, including the guidelines for evaluating such amendments as contained in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan;and • 1 WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center • did determine that Planning Application No. 2012-010, as submitted by Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company, may be approved based upon the following considerations: A. The Planned Unit Development Amendment is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. B. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. C. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. D. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this development can be considered an asset to the community. E. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for • evaluating Planned Unit Development Amendment as contained in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal is, therefore,in the best interest of the community. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2012-010 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. Allow the revision of original Building B (Lot 8, Block 1 Shingle Creek Crossing), from the original proposed bank/financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use, to be relabeled as Building C. 2. Allow the reconfiguring original Building C (Lot 11, Block 1, SCC) from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food restaurant with drive thru service and retail use,to be relabeled as Building G. 3. Allowances for these new Building C and G layouts are conditioned on the Applicant/Developer submitting a new plat (replat) of the new lot and block configurations, as illustrated on the June 28 2012 PUD plan sets, and shall reflect in general conformance with the updated Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 3, dated June 2012. 2 • 4. The overall approval of the Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 3, dated June 2012, is not being recognized as an approved or final updated master plan at this time. The Applicant/Developer will be required to submit under a future PUD Amendment application request the acceptance and adoption of an updated master plan, which plan shall govern the planned and future redevelopment areas of this site. 5. The approval of these lot reconfigurations shall be made under separate plat application, with final plat approval by the City Engineer and City' Council; 6. All existing provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall apply to these sites comprehended under this planning application (No. 2012-010) and all shall remain in effect for the entire Shingle Creek Crossing PUD project site, 7. Execution of a PUD Amendment agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. August 2, 2012 ~ . Date Chair ATTEST: Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Schonning and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Leino,Morgan,Parks,and Schonning and the following voted against the same: Kuykendall. whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 3 MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION • OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION AUGUST 2,2012 (EXCERPTS) CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Rahn at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Sean Rahn, Commissioners Kara Kuykendall, Stan Leino, Carlos Morgan, Michael Parks, and Stephen Schonning were present. Also present were Councilmember Carol Kleven, Secretary to the Planning Commission Tim Benetti, Director of Business& Development, Gary Eitel, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Scott Burfeind was absent and excused. APPLICATION NO.2012-010 LOREN VAN DER SLIK(GATLIN DEVELOPMENT) Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-010, consideration of a proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment (No. 2) to amend the previously approved 20111 Planned Unit Development for Shingle, Creek Crossing project (September 12, 2011). (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 8-2-12 for Application No. 2012-010.) Mr. Benetti explained that this application is to consider the following two amendments: • • Revise Building B (Lot 8, Block 1, SCC) from an original proposed bank/financial use to a new convenience food restaurant with drive-thru service use, as new labeled Building C; and • Reconfiguration of original labeled Building C (Lot 11, Block 1, SCC) from a retail use to a new mixed-use of convenience food with drive thru service and retail use, as new labeled Building G. He further explained the amendment requests a significant reduction of New Building C from 9,100 sf. retail/service use to a 2,488 sf. restaurant, along with a continuation of the drive-thru service lane. The lot size is also being reduced from 1.21 acres down to 0.85 acres. The restaurant site is also changing from its originally designed'41 spaces (ratio of 4.51 spaces per 1,000 sf. GFA) to only 27 spaces (ratio of 10.85 spaces per 1,000 GFA). Under the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD ,Agreement, buildings are allowed to be reduced (from their original approved size indications) and all restaurants or eating establishments must attain or exceed 10 spaces per 1,000 sf. of GFA. The restaurant pad is also proposed to have a small outdoor patio area for its patrons. He added that the proposed PUD amendment requests the New Building G to be reduced to 8,420 sf.. of mixed restaurant/retail service use,with 63 parking spaces (7.48 ratio), while slightly increasing the lot to 1.45 acres. The amendment also requests the allowance of a new drive-thru • PC 8-2-12 • service lane to the end-cap restaurant user. Staff has knowledge of this proposed restaurant user and has deemed this use to be a convenience food type restaurant use as well. Mr. Benetti pointed out that when determining the appropriateness of a convenience food restaurant under an existing or established PUD, the City may elect to allow or permit such uses under a typical PUD Amendment process, and the same standards used for determining or granting special use permits may be considered. Mr. Benetti further stated that changes to these two building pad sites,will include modifications to the original platted property lines which will be considered under a future re-plat application. Commissioner Parks asked about the possibility of an outdoor patio dining area on the fast food restaurant sites and the location and safety of pedestrian traffic on these sites. Mr. Benetti confirmed that safety issues for pedestrians have been adequately addressed on the site. He further explained that the various sites have been laid out to provide adequate parking and proper flow of pedestrian traffic. He added there are no plans on this site for outdoor patio areas. It was further explained by staff that there is a fence planned around the perimeter of the site to discourage pedestrian traffic from jaywalking across Bass Lake Road and to control access on the site. Further, walkways on the site do not continue out to the controlled intersection on Bass Lake Road due to the location of the fence. Commissioner Carlos Morgan arrived at 7:12 p.m. Chair Rahn stated that taking a look at the proposed changes indicates that with the trends in the market, we are shrinking the box stores and eliminating some of the proposed retail for more fast food. He feels that it may eliminate adding desired retail later on. He is concerned that the site is building boxes based on the market rather than waiting for what was initially planned. Mr. Benetti stated that those issues have been a concern for staff as well and they have had discussions with the developer regarding the direction the development is taking. It is anticipated that some retail as well as some sit down restaurants and a financial institution will be back on the plans in the future. Commissioner Kuykendall stated that this amendment does not complete the Commission's vision for what they hoped to see on this site. She is very disappointed and fearful regarding how much has changed from the original plan and if they approve this amendment, all that will be on this site will be fast food with drive thru windows. She added that approving this plan opens the gateway for fast foods that was not the intent of the original plan. Commissioner Parks stated that if you reduce the size of the buildings and add drive thrus, it does not create an atmosphere where people will stick around for a very long period of time and limits opportunities for businesses to be successful. Commissioner Kuykendall responded that this plan encourages people to get in and get out • without ever leaving their car and kind of fits what is expected. She added a Wal-Mart was PC 8-2-12 approved and now we will put in more fast food that will draw a certain type of clientele. This is not what she expected for this development. Commissioner Leino suggested that they could get some numbers from a business to analyze how much of the business is from drive thru and how much is sit down. Then it could be determined if there will be more pedestrian traffic versus vehicles. He added that he has a concern with the vision and how that has been affected by market trends which changed what was originally planned and approved.' Commissioner Schonning stated that Caribou does not build a store without a drive thru anymore. He added he is also concerned that the overall tone of the site stays with the original plan with more sit down restaurants. He also hopes that the sit down restaurants will be located along the creek to enhance the new day-lighting. Mr. Eitel stated when the applicant laid out the original site, they laid out the biggest box size possible so they would not have to go back to get approvals to increase any buildings. He added that they are merely reducing the footprint of some of the buildings proposed and there will be as much seating as the owner wants and will meet the parking requirements. He further stated that there will be full sit down restaurants along the creek but with current market trends, larger chains are not expanding, however, they are still looking for potential restaurants. Mr. Eitel added that he doesn't feel the original intent on the site has changed. Commissioner Kuykendall added that she feels this area is shaping up to look like a less desirable site than what she expected. • PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-010 There was a motion b Commissioner Leino seconded b Commissioner Parks to open the Y � Y p p ublic hearing on Application N o. 2 012-010, at 7:53 p. n. The motion passed un animousl y. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. Mr. Luke Payne consultant engineer with Kimley-Horn Associates and representing Gatlin Development, stated that development standards will be high and whatever goes in will be high quality. He added with the PUD amendment they trying to create some flexibility to enhance the ability to bring in quality tenants. Further, by adding drive thrus to the site gives them flexibility with future tenants. He added they will continue to provide good shopping experiences to add to Kohl's, Sear's and Wal-Mart. Mr. Payne explained they have a number of letters of intent from other retailers which they hope to finalize soon. He encouraged the Commission to keep in mind, by bringing in quality tenants it helps to secure other tenants in the development. Chair Rahn asked if there will be significant changes between Phase 2 and 3. Mr. Payne explained that the biggest changes will be to Buildings H, K and L, however, they don't have strong letters of intent yet. He added they usually don't develop on a site without letters of intent. PC 8-2-12 Commissioner Parks asked what is the driving force to put in less parking and provide more • green space or is it determined by the City. Mr. Payne stated that a PUD identifies certain requirements that must be maintained on the site. He added that the strong connectivity between walkways was intended. They are not strained by parking requirements but are meeting the needs of their tenants and have reached a nice balance between parking and landscaping. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Morgan,to close the public hearing on Application No. 2012-010. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION . NO. 201216 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-010 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK (FOR GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)AMENDMENT TO THE 2011 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PUD There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Schonning,to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-16. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners, Leino, Morgan,Parks and Schonning And the following voted against the same: Kuykendall • The motion passed. The Council will consider the application at its August 13,2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. • PC 8-2-12 • City Council Agenda Item No. 9b • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM • DATE: August 13 2012 TO Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist THROUGH: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development SUBJECT: Resolution Regarding the Recommended Disposition of Planning Application No. 2012-012—Submitted by Loren Van Der Slik(Gatlin Development Company) for Site and Building Plan Approval for Proposed Building G (Located at 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing). Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council, following consideration of this planning application item, adopt the Resolution Regarding the Recommended Disposition of Planning Application No. 2012-012 Submitted by Loren Van Der Slik (Gatlin Development Company) for Site and Building Plan Approval for Proposed Building G(Located at 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing). Background: On August 2,2012 the Planning Commission considered Planning Commission Application No. 2012-012 submitted by Loren Van Der Slik (Gatlin Development Company) for Site and Building Plan Approval for Proposed Building G(Located at 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing). Attached for review is the Planning. Commission Report 2012-012 with certain maps and attachments related to this request item. Also attached for review is Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-,17, in which the Commission provided a favorable and unanimous recommendation of the Site and Building Plan Approval for Proposed Building G (Located at 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing). Excerpts from the August 2, 2012 Commission meeting minutes, as related to this consideration of this matter are also attached. Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Council Goals: Strategic: 1. We will proceed aggressively with implementation of City's redevelopment plans. 4. We will improve the city's image. • llssion..Ensnaring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive conununity that enhances the duality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and • moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-012 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK (GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) APPROVING NEW SITE AND BUILDING PLAN FOR PROPOSED BUILDING G (LOCATED ON LOT 11, BLOCK 1, SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING ADDITION— 1180 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING) WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012-012 submitted by Loren Van Der Slik(for Gatlin Development Company)requesting approval of a new Site and Building Plan for proposed Building G, located on Lot 11, Block 1, Shingle Creek Crossing Addition, and addressed as 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing, which approval is in conjunction with the ongoing improvements constructed under the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held a public meeting on August 2, 2012,to fully consider Planning Commission Application No. 2012-012, and reviewed and received a planning report on the proposed new Site and Building Plans for proposed Building G and other related improvements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Site and Building plans are • consistent with the General Development Plans of the overall Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that the Site and Building Plan of proposed Building G, as comprehended under Planning Application No. 2012-012, be approved based upon the following findings and considerations: I. The Site and Building Plan is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance; 2. The Site and Building Plan, in relation to the Planned Unit Development proposed on the Subject Site, will facilitate the redevelopment and improvement of this site,will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land; 3. The improvements and utilization of the property as proposed under the planned redevelopment of this site is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with ordinance standards; RESOLUTION NO. 4. The Site and Building Plan proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city; 5. The Site and Building Plan proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this proposed development can be considered an asset to the community and 6. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating and approving a Site and Building Plan as contained in Section 35-230 (Plan Approval) of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the site proposal is,therefore,in the best interest of the community. WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-16, which provides a favorable recommendation to the City Council that Planning Application No. 2012-012, as submitted by Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company, requesting Site and Building Plan of proposed Building G,be approved based upon the following conditions: 1. Developer/Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer's Review memo, dated June 20, 2012, including (but not limited to): a. The two-way and one-way traffic transition in the southwest corner of the subject site need to be better channelized and delineated; and b. The trash enclosures must be better separated and protected from traffic (e.g. curb and gutters) 2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 3. The building and tenant spaces are to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing systems to meet NFPA standards and connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 4. The location or placement of any fire hydrants and other fire related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief. 5. Final grading,drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. • RESOLUTION NO • 6. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. The new trash enclosure with same building materials as those used to construct the principal building. 7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Site Plan approval is exclusive of all final signs on this site, including new wall (building) signs, which shall remain subject to Chapter 34 of the city ordinances, and subject to the approved Signage Plan of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreements. 9. 136-12 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 10. The Developer shall submit .an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee: • 11 All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center current Standard Specifications and Details. 12. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City's Engineering Department and applicant shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 13. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. 14. All other provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall remain in effect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the findings and considerations to comprehend the approval of Planning Application No. 2012-012, and as determined by the Planning Commission are hereby accepted and the request for Site and Building Plan of proposed Building G is also hereby approved and subject to the same conditions memorialized in this resolution. • RESOLUTION NO. August 13, 2012 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • • ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM 6IZ L.C. MI—W,MN 66`//1011 ra^61249-60 CD _ GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Key Plan �T N ITM ` � •• � ` -j r'S � 'I � i d � 'i MHrlr•.RenS�on/Issue D816 FLOOR PLAN ••m+^ I. A JUM 2 8 2012 _..TENANT TENANT .TENANT TENANT TENANT ° TENANT— _- _ TENANT I TENANT SHINGLE CREEK -I' 4 CROSSING •` SOUTH ELEVATION ^'P••^ L NORTH ELEVATION w•'••a BR001<DALE CENTER REDEVELOPMENT •.• BROOKLYN CENTER,MN TENANT TENANT .:f ,....... OUTLOT BUILDING G WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ^••r^' A6 A Consortium,L.L.C.2012 'y ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL - N 9o'"x�icix man ss u e'iP""aCW'a+i ww uEmo pUERT TO CONTRACTOR 6 _.'. ­­- am P H H S E L (» IT.Au4-R AxolxeF mss " t SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS s STORMWATER PLANNING AND ZONING E>a —T T xaw °aI ML (THE PRESENCE OT OR—IDNATER SH U)BE _ axlm. fax[P'uaRAr AN1RpPAlED ON IXIS PROJECT.�EIIITOIIS SMAII SIIEE{If1EIe QUE CIXi510ERAWON FYIfl PIE. BUILDING G ... ON)as>ex„ EFERENCE 711E CON51RUC110N BY 8070 COVER SHEEP PIRE PREVENTION HEALTH DEPT. BRAUN INTEA_ Al6R OVERALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION gMWNEssEx BuPN wMM pEWA1ERM0 PEOUIPEAIENIA s s xwawr AWxxM xaalx PwxEMA mxmPPrr ar xex.,x p 8020 CONTROL PLAN PHASE 1 Exvaax,arAt Meum wRPa FOR OVERALL EROSIONAND SEDIMENTATION gpd4 ioW aw PS,m "xa»M SwfEr f3 (ea,>)t 7 n,-an7 era. raacroas xrAer .. � 8027 CONTROL PLAN PHASE 2 ° 5 BUILDING DIVISION HENNEPIN COUNTY GOPHER STATE 11ftPNE 8U22 CONTROL DETAILS.MENTATION FDRE R­was Mm �A a _RYAREA�EHa R SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING wmale x ax xxx Erx caxx ovRw MR. 6030 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN n S 8040 OVERALL SITE PLAN Way "Im� 1e— 'at a LOCATED AT 8043 SITE PLAN $ �, 6050 1 OVERALL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN i II $. 5053 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN XERXES AVENUE NORTH AND COUNTY ROAD 10 6060 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN $ PROJECT TEAM BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 6083 UTILITY ER LL PH PLAN � 8080 OVERALL PNOTOMETRIC3 PLAN � .I g$ OWNERlDEVELOPER ARCHITECT 5083 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN g E 3 Innrx x.wx xx: xv AxD<rtsoxw E. BTOi OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN F SECTION 2,TOWNSHIP 118N,RANGE 21W ggg 9 aaruM OEVE dauPAxr wcxrremurtu aFwu xw x• eanA»s.wc. 8104 LAND.4CAPE PLAN i1ig� n »�P UaAP tvo r.m PwxdaxWAmemEtEPwTEa2o _rNwPERrTMAlIDEEwEET'WREmaM PARCEL ID#=03-118-21-41-0024,02-118-21-32-0009,02-118-21-32-0010 9y ry xOERONE,.1— EAPOM,.MwNE,0TA 6l W, PAw..NwxE_.., A EE`D_ rP.— Wr)..<» 02-118-21-31-0056,02-118-21-31-0055,02-118-21-32-0014 g s ft«µ�a)dOMaE1 FA%MIa EE1M6a FA%IESII6ClIm p E aEUm,w.,Pae»M AmP«xaaaa aEP A E LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 02-118-21-23-0023,02-118-21-32-0017,03-118-21-14-0021 lzC�S ei „: Aa,aa 6,.PM. 03-118-21-14-0032,02-118-21-32-0011,02-118-21-31-0049 ®®6 aOWT PoBLVD E u1a»,WTeANNUEMa»T.PUIrFxaM oSQI �� E EERITPAU.YWNENT PAM.D YwrtEBOTA 63», SSS a �Iaxa an, M 1 ry 4 aT z u, z o � 15 P GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER ENVIRONMENTAL/H RDOUS MATERIALS 4 g €" 59th AVE. B " EVE E ' PPAUNIxTEIIWi CORPOMTroq BM(IP INTMT! PP g ®® N f1lIyAY 45H1lt5VEW�.. ; 8 I e a ao rMu6 su M tM 5110 PROJECT LOCATION oR. A.�l_QAR .I fn 0EDII. m 5 7t Al.AV A, S $ SUROUES.LA. tW Up. tltltl s UTILITY RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX FOR THIS PROJECT ECKBER DR. ERIM w OR .� UTILITY/GOVERNMG J' z F CONTRACiOp RESPONSISNtt 01HERm RCSPONSIBILIWES U P• z 55th AVE. N. W B AGENCIES CONTACTS as uxwm ra:wa no S17-1-13-1 nE odaumaisaisTMiw°AE K �E ws P� 55th 3 55th W 8. cAS wxxEVwae aceR�wEE P""wWa....a aP:"M a°rRE cmwlnE �Ea� e""' � �5Ath AV.� 5atn< a (e IN I» V x 551E P4 N. LILAC O C w W IRE iEAAx Pm r� R. L $ a E a» Jao i IAii CWPA a fx na oc ' 53rd AVE.N. 53rd AVE 4 W A S BWILraU M Eep m waam� 1P aeESr 3 11'' > TM- § CABLE/ ME)uI-an aru weial P-x'sRrtOwf u Y z z Q OU. P TELEPHONE =­]­noFes, Ei r WuV kwFxs ,1y ¢ 52 nd AV E.N. 52 nd AVE.z z N 7 0 eua�nr+a. rAwrn s EPSa. ' rz PGA FM SxEmmm VICINITY a a 00wE amE. om Powr a ° uc uP m c ERE u »a uxA ` ElECTRic i»5)..x-,ax, r—ONEfl eea mP.0 N.T.S. .— a u w Nt W c. MIE�WaroEaPert Ao AE Pmm :AMr Arai am wce a Wu EE Z ,4wx a¢aaw sAWa Oro P wsrNt NI wunw w5 ruu EE PNO n1E uxxEaN y U' e a xw WA Pam. �.M E PREPARED BY: mu,O z cm PaoPrc Nw wmau,w m w m Axo Arvnw - a�as r ASSaa EE —PER P m P „T, a�R. Idm I HGm wo o 11 APrnu uM PNVArz soar '< 6 ..,,Y I uAruco°I pEO EA att d waa ❑III- and Aagodalee,Inc. V W J 9 E. SEWER (»)SAFSIwaawMP Y CI 15 rc r'Exa¢u aF rWmac ua a wuaxtWi"caw»a IIJ vnAE adEM»fM.r[MUtt PLW W Z m garr anowo: �sma .xa aewwo ARE Nxrt 3 M K : -"1 of % n Aw m axrzP Nm rIa aa.E°cerzwaKaAO.. °s 9a.W MN aYfCPICA WA RE PER 5 sa mr "wMAU J Nxaa aHm aM O 5 E WA ER ,E"wa GATUN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Z m a Ih e. aC0°RgXdxEa uro:a ao xceirn axxu - toj 5 MawaExEl°Pi¢ MN f ER NOTE. ro TRE FOt 140 REPwe DAX DEER. S1GPM. �]0 a SOp •.r s. SEMI Ma REWPEa V rteawN)x REOTECHN GPt eNUA ON ORT MA,1 PROJECT N0.MWX SEW rta0allTx CEV���WAME In �Mpv�gaPAAW� WeNf. REta°ENO IPPIIEA&F A4EMF4a ELE uP cVN1RNONPEPORT 180633001. OaJ)»P-5510 O N(i OATEa SHEET NUMBER F PMM REEK ROew RRlE 9. a MI5 P».a PAP,EM P Z WE M NS m uIET a ExaW,=A.WE a V n "�wrm NNES:aaaR a a� 6010 a I 1 2.... 3 4 8 6. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 DEVELOPE CITY OF BROOKLYN a R/OWNER.w CENTER rSce Saw rt s CONTRACTOR: COUNT 9 n NO 10. BASS LAKE ROAD -- =4-^-z N6'a BASS C ouMry RD N tnrc .. \ ,RD W610'BASSIAYE ROA 'I`T' `_ .�-.."-'- 1. __ y�•�- (i FLOOD ZONE NOTE Ol r 0 / L / \ aF mn2'Y rm ■ �E�€ o p j w "� y Q/ ' Iv , 1 LL GONraACTgla IT CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE LA MN TOLL FREE 1-a 2-1155 a • € 9 1' R6l.Y'� O {�\ �'qq / q.�� !. `� ` I \�'. �/, TNN�CITY�RREPA891-0 X00 L N a £F3 � 'rw� � �S;. � I,/ _ `/�o. `, ��� \ i i!t j t � r �•'.9�'' vw.s axnmw a,eamx, c �3�3 2{a gg�i9 N F I �, ar�sxK"�a'IT S.1 A e 1 \r SITE FEATURES £$ n •i` zs $[? G ft aw-Bxaw �IE6 Fl 7... r o maa H EXISTING SEARS �.. � l y rt aEV x --.20 Z W l9 s 1 o 15 fit ACREAGE SUMMARY-PROJECT EROSION DETAILS W W n. PHASE 11(AT TOTAL BUILD-OUT) J J w ® wu, aawxaxT66w,xa J W co i ' arc c W p_® U 5 rw.aSxaP OF s 0 6 . —w— w ul K c Bav aT Sxa i ® � Of Lu $ p ak 5x x TB aaN W \ /rte "'r m L. ` 1\` q� OFF-SITE MATERIAL AflEAt31 INFORMATCON f ® W O LL,> N6.ROx awFwrt.rexw.w a �.. _--f' Pvmxl,ar6 xBSaT tiBPec' ® ® 6x-am P,a to d z �M E Yl __.. mww„M,2Faw,rxwa BATE 6 — 24G P E x xw wa 4x5 v a Prz 06/2B/2012 o . aaaaw " PROJECT N0.. S 1 4� 60633001 >: f. parm.�5 wrtau�na H 9 _ ,) ccrvm RL w S OXLY 1 • '. wFaw xaOFn FM 566 FvA w6r xaMxar ran xnaxcl. SHEET NUMBER ;> � a.A,a• �w Sax w.,axaw<r• 6021 wN g £409 N tl3BW11N 133X5 j 'ON 103I'Otld x z10z/9z/90 mw« SM W wnWe rod oYS nY6�'«. s = se«urw,W rwun of Muuoa'lt.. 1 g-O W— awnx:om:w swan wn,o rn3 a:Y« oro: d �j 0 IOIN9�Nllpl9s tlL A mn Nw1 NIO]a9 '(( 1W1 / (n 0 m sxoN Y6 S9LL 1 ssYU1gtl 1SWY3NSN0«301p]NNOd3N�+ f N,r(A 9Nx as a o1pVnxno»v xo« ar'"e•woxs•}G�«ce /j y j �`� l Z) �. � C: n m Z ve snd awn ro±ur3vmxsr txnddn xs°W°Mt, wrm N / +'/ if , `\ / �.. g pp �.♦ +^ 3l8Hl V1H0311S - Z m 0 z Z 9srnw wtl ,d/ •� 'srws .m" u .w o t gg F w9 \ N9 z999-rsr-w9 r3tlr uio Nwi w xs Nlar '2 M.NOIIOOtll5NI10 360338 '' sW '. Co Ao3r. 9911-ZS2-009-1 33W TI01 NW / siumu°w`wi°0u9 Yr �" ram v NO 1'1V031V1S ii3HdOJ / ,/• / o� ls is.. 13r11p0 stlw� wi°`ais�30oE9M10Y""«Y« S310N NVld.3LS r \ Y3Swroa Al r 93saaotla ® �\ \\� +� ;,`1 \` ,\ \ 9 R $Ell N0` �ON30371 HO1VH 1N3W3AVd 0 3 11 9Np (9w Y):>nn p "� - i� �x0 s<wwNw" xi N msn oa"+eg4�s 3 9YA 1,smear O O «««A,2,9> 2x�av \`\l�90 1— 3-1 ol P O I NWRII AS (aW wA xoc aovrdxru+%Q.. e I�, ... . .. 9wssors Nruds9s3a N A3N 3115 C I U-1 W xAC 'I NN«Yra N9 Yd 9Yw d,9 n p —1 s - 2 ----- ---- g O a 0 ,u ^^ 1 36 OHi9NN A2 A n HLtlON -•.•. „� +.JV UJ`' DWI SSVU 01 ON � a.�2±NVN,pgtl9n)Opw}ra,_ „y ON30313115O OZ 61 9l L1 91 bl fl ZL 11 01 6. 9 L 9 S 4 f Z 1 '. 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 1 8 9 10 ii 12 13 ib 16 17 1 18 19 20 J 6 '^ ,i TmB Paoxtt ea cT°xs .: J E w< _ r _ — t�. caaannnmWn x.s. . w +zo CAD r!':)4-0_./;SASS LAKE RDAS)\ 1� ..... I� \ f e • ` y I s FEET .GOP E acra+S HLIST wx)ncr 11 q _ -`- caLB H R STATE CALL ONE. '�` •.�,e ate' ='°g`.'.�..,A_ '__ __ -a S, _ _ _ s -? /•�„ _ — _ _ - :. �. rTi `r MN air ARcasiR�s-OOW SITE KEY FA G \ �~ /1 F F E. BST:O / F.. ,,(( G 1 / / @yE r EKE F P.E \ /T-g c L M \ / 4S � /I F.F.E.'850. LEGEND p ma m. m°snme,xcr a ya+ � S C•--�>� `, soss . 0r� �. 'I �"l ? 'T. 1 i/J I,f+" ��1�1y�\. �' 1� 1-� -—_ �l �` • - ——� 'I \\\ �� \ \ -----... mmaWmE,ma,:mRa.tt .,<ePB ,c ,gym s � T F � .��\�Sr_•\ F.F.E..BSO.S \\ \. f j \\ / /'rl '\ I\ '� �\ C� \\ �� �•n � $63 d$ D � •:�f. �\\ \•\ \ I... / I �1 F.F'E..8/7.)3 ®\\\ � � t` C K M "z \ / I F•r 8 • - , r �"\ \ \\�ly,\\,\\\ r DRAINAGE SCHEDULE \f� STRUCTURE STRUCTURE RIM/ORN)E NVERT PI PE INVENT RPE PIPE Q'^ TYPE ELEVAl10N EU Amm 52E SLOPE ELEV M 53E ROPE NOTES' I:J. W OUT WT WT V W R I �•\. 18\ mE,nw .BBm Z(7 EPEE Kxl III :,• a Ex Q 0) b E r C7 \ \ I I 1 .} K y�// /� o W r, W Z� Lu$L. g. ' ;' \/ \\ L i1y . i//. IY Y N W In _: X / •i r / f w y e / 3 PROJECT x0. o �Jo� SHEET NUNRER N • • 6053 tt � 1 2 3 4 :.8 fi 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19. 20 1D N� 10 ASS LAKE ROAD 1 SITE KEY G:.89T UTILITY LEGEND �. .�. a f `�l$`�C•- �+ �.-. - ._�. 9-- - - .:•r"'.I _s\, ©=rsc�"°ws vrfi�rrvn�e- s` � # a \� — •,� I � .».,_ :EPm»5 ,6eA„�w6,aHA»6».r,e 8 /• r Pa=«.use , 1 1 gE 2 s,\ I `\ \ rar warnxc m suc,w mm»w a corw,s 1 \\ f `P V. g� A.OpALwFvei.'ry PoS, F vkw.x,gN ML ei ^^ESA K K g D. a � v= ^"^ l •« \ \\\ r�, �'-� .•Aw^, ;Poxes,•-•-•�':`��' �H�� \;1,\ Hp;fie s�eR ^.,..�.:>»�» �n� � « SANITARY SEWER BUILDING CONNECTION \s SANITARY MANHOLE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE (�z 55 W INVERT INVERT W STRUCTURE STRUCTURE RIM/GRATE ELEVATION ELEVATION : O F Z NO. .TYPE ELEVATION IN OUT \ R Z UL Z m B SANITARY CLEANOUT STRUCTURE SCHEDULE J O a YW s z $ assw^e=ro'sI TMen[rc STRUCTURE RNA/GRATE INVERT INVERT (7 _ 2 g T wi er e»Nx. ELEVATON: ELEVATION Z m 6 sa 00oi.0 N0. ELEVATION IN OUT 0- �� 9 a ewes s 6Axs6 DATE ALL—TRAC— nan­T Y tg GOPHER STATE CALL ONE P-EOT N9. 3 -IL GHEE I-600.252-1166 N T b OnR EA H 8510<5a�--0002 WEE N R Q 1 2 3 4 5 11 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD i { fi-_� _ _ '�-_ - -.f� 1 NORTH --- ---- r - - �f FEET �kj�.�• �' i rl �T �1 I }� ^�� 3RM sEY PHOTOMETRIC NOTES:IE TrT N.�E6°`N�e 0 _..wEOMR D ATI C �e � e.3R.,TeNON«�6eP6,R ❑ a 4}y .Q E a •\ �T\ ,...\ �'" 1 e. NWNTIRB mIXBT0F42FEET.VA�Tx.R•ai�xTURe a•aFI[ET mEr cur sxeen 8 fro n 3 0 ESE r� EXISTING PARKING LOT EXISTING PEDESTRIAN M� s LIGHTING LIGHTING H \ _ POLEB Z FU(lUPEB UGHTPOL88 a' f �\ , '1 I ... %/ \r eFC 1PGGT CPNOLES) FIXTURES d 8FI3 F. F. g �'` �• 1 ,}� -r PROPOSED PARKING LOT PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN p... LIGHTING LIGHTING D. S 1 s h! ow z C, Z 1; owc .�R w 0[O M4 09 Tom Tom iono Y J w 5 LL CR,TRI.CmFE WET CONTACT ' v m w ' GOPHER STATE CALL ONE J MN TOLL FREE 1-800-ZSZ-1166 -(3Y T z [ BEMRE CONSTRUCTON BEGINS ' ,nuw 41 TvnN.clTr ANEA 651-454-owz. rn�® .m.,'M•, Z 4..z. MOECT NO. w Mtt 16065]001 € SHEET HUMBER gS 6083. 9 10 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 1 18 1 17 18 19 1 20 N010 BASS _n�C�0 �TY GOPHER STATE CALL ON -.__ - ----- I i NORTH Cl� GMN TOaI FREE 1-ETON B-1166E CONSIRUC110ry EE0N3 1 1 Y _= j(/EASEMENT -------------- - T-�'T''�__�_y,�3 I _�/ ••,•,. 1mry ntt aREa sw-x3n-000z /� I _ If7 ______ y 1 J ___ ------ a _ } I_ I _ .• \\ ALERTTOCONTRACTOR A. Is 4i " fi j� w�wf"s.T. �wM'ra.w"E i °`o°s a':x�:,°�x�E :w . txxot xEaa ro Fxo�xf� RMt i y I \ ••. SITE KEY P T,onoaa Rfaxauum no aafmFCtoa o' C a � ,c S } gg .n a MENT !.; LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES m ,� 1.nAa a nFRt aa®ow Rxw.ow MEw ua nnxlHe x6a ;�. ;;. >.waraa6amuwsmu.me x�Mtl�a�au �,5 'S 11,200 F � �••• ,'\ \ ,/f� :}'. "4���;,�� (h,`�\ \ i�MeoxFi wwnw Swart,us NVU mr �8m RN ' III✓✓✓,,,\\l Frq ocr Fw H.wsc ew Rrtvxuaox uo 9 c :57'DRAINAGE rutamueow'wsimwwreowa.roR. �a ,d \AND UTILITY ! .�•� tw.ms'IVETUm 1i°Mt"'a.mxtnxaor,.nsu @66'e" g z !!@" I' •�\� >.\ 1 \€ASEMENT amww mw muaaT.x anew .u �°a5b a MM .'� $ _.� � . t,C� I `\ ✓ xev rax rNaxxius ts•aFr m6E a � � � 4y` � \q �. 3 sao fu�snMew uus�axn r,1a-rtxue sw 'erg Egg Be � ((� ' py v.aoo.aus Nxorto w,x no uaw me FU FEmM Sm 3`t° i S W w.H a ..�,.", �• i(j"7�'j \ r a LEGEND a. Lu c¢ Q p a �\� ✓ �- z I PHASE 2PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE \ - SYMBOL OTY I co-- SRE ROOT w- v° ---�,DiiAINAl'. Z Z Hw, UTY Q F K. a r ,� j (1)U 0 9 L_ I LU BE exaxeex 6 °/ / xwcco xwsreuxu n cart Z =O r,v U) rtx n axr. ,� axwmxxaxr ewucw n wxr. x auvixe wms 'n cam. OA. 06/23/]01] PROJEOi N0. f SwEfi wUMEfR N i 6104 a � " of BROL' OKE}lV' _ATER Application Filed on 06/26/2012 • City Council action should be taken by 08/25/12(60 Days) Planning Commission Report ----------------------------- --— --—� Meeting Date: August 2 2012 Application No. 2012-012 _ Applicant: Loren Van Der Slik- Gatlin Development Company Location: 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing Request: Site&Builidng Plan-Building G INTRODUCTION Gatlin Development Company is requesting review and consideration of a Site and Building Plan' approval for the new building labeled "G" as part of the approved Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD). This is one of fifteen new buildings proposed to be built within this PUD site. This site plan item does not require a public hearing, but can be considered under a standard public meeting review, whereby comments from the general public may be allowed or noted for the record. Written notices have been mailed to property owners within 350-feet of the site. • BACKGROUND On May 23, 2011 the City Council approved the original Shingle Creek Crossing PUD for the redevelopment of the former Brookdale Mall properties, with the exception of the Sears and Holiday station. The Shingle Creek Crossing;PUD site was originally zoned as PUD/C-2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce) district. This zoning remains in place and is not subject to any changes or modifications at this time. At the August 25, 2011 meeting, a new PUD Amendment was reviewed and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission, which was accepted and approved by the City Council on September 12, 2011. Approvals related to this PUD amendment included the separation of the former food court building from the Sears store building, along with the removal one future building pad site and the addition of an additional restaurant pad site, and other slight modifications. The Developer has requested (under separate application) a PUD Amendment to allow modifications to this site,which includes a change from the original designed multi-tenant retail building space to a new mixed-use multi-tenant retail building with allowance for a convenience food restaurant user and related drive-thru service lane. Other changes include a slight change to the original lot configuration. • • The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Master (Development) Plan was approved with a plan to build a new 182,000 sf. Wal-Mart retail store, the keeping and remodeling of the .old Brookdale Mall food court building, and fifteen new building pad sites, some of which were intended to be for typical retail uses (as either single users or multi-tenant spaces); restaurant pad sites or service uses. Construction work on the new Wal-Mart store and other site/utility improvements are nearing completion, and other areas of the PUD site are now being considered. The City recently approved the site and building plans for Buildings H, K, and L and work on those is anticipated to begin in the near future. ❖ SITE & BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS This proposed Building G was originally identified under the May/September 2011 PUD plans as Building C, which was intended to be a 12,225 sf. retail building on a 1.44 acre pad site (as illustrated on the diagram below—lower left). This pad site was also platted as Lot 11, Block 1, Shingle Creek Crossing. The new Bldg. G (lower right) is scheduled to be a smaller multi- tenant, mixed use building of 8,420 sf. with virtually same size lot of 1.45 acres. This lot and surrounding lots may undergo a replat in the future (but are not for consideration under this application). ------------------ ---------- -----U COUNTY ROAD .- 1_0------ • COUNTY ROAD NU-1-0 icamw I t -- _ - r .� 1 YLON SIGN PROPOSED MONUMENT 10NUMENT SIGN SIGN AOL 12.22W f Al 8 420sf _ { V� APPROVED PUD—SEPTEMBER 2011 PROPOSED PUD—AUGUST 2012 As part of the PUD Agreement between Gatlin Development and the City, the Developer is allowed to decrease final building sizes without the need for any PUD amendment or special approvals, but is not allowed to increase building sizes, except in certain cases where a 5% increase is allowed under City Zoning Code Section 35-355. Subdiv. 5.d. • App.No.2012-012 PC 08/02/12 II ❖ ACCESS & PARKING • �- FkSTI iG r.DNLA'ENT 9-N _10' UTILITY E .... ---�1---------- TRAS r 11 U ENCLOSURE The new Site and Building Plan for Building G is noted in the above diagram. Plans call for 64 parking spaces on this site, which calculates to a 7.48 parking ratio. The original pad layout (Bldg. C — shown below) was designed to accommodate 55 spaces, for a 4.5 parking ratio. The new parking area had to be adjusted to accommodate the added need for the convenience food space. DECORATIVE 15' ROW-DEDICATION FENCING....- _ -- :. 4V I �BUILDI Hai S.ETB� K I 12,225sf I : --LOT 11 _$LC,� B The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreement provided a parking standard reduction for retail uses from 5.5 spaces per 1,000 sf. of gross floor area(GFA) to areduced 4.5 spaces per 1,000 sf. of gross leaseable area(GLA). Restaurants were allowed to reduce from one space per two seats plus one per employee to a reduced 10 per 1,000 sf. of GLA, with an added provision that up to 20% of the GLA in a multi-tenant retail building may be a restaurant use without the need for additional parking. As noted in the floor plan(below)the total GLA for this Bldg. G is 8,314 sf. ga 2a sa-a^ -y ax-a se-o• r r � 4 9/J s �2 x 1. TENANT Tz"Ir iEtw TEIV+tT TP.VMT MOOT i i ua s-cz 4 10 W IM OF iaca 9 r�ao� ,moo W isaa or t .. FLGOR PLAN r.ma As indicated in this report,the proposed end-cap tenant space is reserved for a"convenience food restaurant" use with a drive-thru window service lane. This tenant space is shown with a 1,834 sf space, or 22% of the GLA. Even with the slight increase over the 20%o threshold, the site provides additional parking spaces and exceeds the original 4.5 ratio with a new 7.48 ratio. Even separating out the tenant space uses and applying the PUD approved parking standards,this site's parking could be calculated as follows: Restaurant Use: 1,834 sf. GLA= 1.834 x 10= 18.34, or 19 spaces required Retail Uses: 6,480 GLA=6.48 x 4.5 =29.16, or 30 spaces required. Based on these calculations, the site is providing 15 more spaces than required by the PUD. The additional parking on this site should easily accommodate this restaurant use and serve the other retail uses adequately. App.No.2012-012 PC 08/02/12 Access into this site is limited to the main access point off the east/west access road through the S PUD. Vehicles entering the site have two-way maneuvering to the parking areas along the east and south sides of this building site. The traffic is limited to one-way along the back(north) and west sides of this site, due to the limitations created by the inclusion of the drive-thru lane for the westerly end-cap user. Signage and striping of the lot will be key in keeping traffic free from any conflicts entering and exiting this site. The City Engineers have indicated some concerns of this in their review memo (attached hereto), and have asked the Developer to provide "...better channel[ization] and delineat[ion]"of this traffic in the southwest portion of this site. The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD was approved with an overall architectural [elevation] plan as part of the original approvals. All new buildings plan to incorporate 4-sided architecture in their designs, meaning all four elevations must provide a nice, consistent use of material on all four sides of the buildings, including rear elevations. As noted on the enclosed architectural plans, this Building is slated to receive a nice mix of stone veneers EIFS concrete brick veneers g � , integrally colored rock face block, spandrel glass and other materials. These proposed architectural materials are consistent with the previously approved Architectural Standards (including materials)the City called for under the original PUD Agreement. ❖ GRADING/DRAINAGE/UTILITIES The finished grades and drainage grades for this this site and adjacent building sites are intended to be constructed under a future land disturbance permit. The site plans and related attachment plans included separate grading and drainage plans for this and other sites. Most of these sites (and primarily the entire PUD site last year)have been or will be reviewed by the City Engineer for full compliance and acceptance. Since some of the overall PUD development site infrastructure has already been installed, there is not much room for need to depart from the original and approved grading/drainage plans. All areas of this site appear to drain properly or do not require any special drainage structures or modification prior to building approvals. ❖ LANDSCAPING The Applicant has submitted a landscape plan which appears to be consistent with the approved PUD Master Plan. Plans call for the installation of various deciduous trees (oaks, maples, hackberry, elms or honey locust) around the parking islands of this building site. A few evergreens (spruce,red pines or junipers) are planned for areas on the west side, north(rear)side of the building, and few inside the parking lot. The plan is completed with a small number of ornamental deciduous trees (birches, lilacs,or crabapples). All trees and landscaped areas will be irrigated. This lot is also improved with a small rain garden feature to the rear of this building. ❖ LIGHTING/TRASH The site plans for Bldg. G calls for two 39-ft. high single-headed light standards along the back parking area and one, dual headed lamp in the front parking lot area. The photometric plan illustrates the main front area of the building will be provided with suitable and adequate light coverage, with pedestrian lighting along the outer walkways. • APP.No.2012-012 PC 08/02/12 The plans illustrate two new outdoor trash enclosures for this site. The SCC Master Plan did not illustrate or indicate the placement of any trash enclosure areas within this PUD site. Staff assumed that most of these building sites may attempt or had planned to have all trash inside said buildings. It is not uncommon to see (or allow)this typical trash enclosures in retail/service uses such as this PUD site. The plans did not provide a "typical trash enclosure" detail; however, as the City did in the previous approvals of Bldgs. H, K. and L, these similar style structures shall be approved to be constructed with pre-colored rock faced block materials similar to the main buildings, with composite wood gates. These enclosures will be required to be well maintained and gates closed at all times (except during unloading times). City Engineers also requested better separation of these enclosures and protection from traffic,by means of curb and gutter sections.. Staff assumes the Developers engineering/design consultants will provide additional measures as noted by the City Engineers and address these items under the future building permit submittals: CITY ENGINEER REVIEW The City Engineer has provided a review and comments regarding this application in his July 20, 2012 memorandum to city planning staff, attached hereto. Most of these comments and conditions reflect the improvements approved under the PUD Plan amendment. Some of these conditions maybe applicable at time of future building permit review and approvals. • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No.2012-17,which comprehends the approval of Planning Application No. 2012-012, a Site and Building Plan for the proposed Building G,which is part of the approved Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit' Development, subject to the following conditions: 1. Developer/Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer's Review memo, dated June 20, 2012, including (but not limited to): a. The two-way and one-way traffic transition in the southwest corner of the subject site need to be better channelized and delineated; and b. The trash enclosures must be better separated and protected from traffic (e.g. curb and gutters). 2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 3. The building and tenant spaces are to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing systems to meet NFPA standards and connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 4. The location or placement of any fire hydrants and other fire related building code • items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief. App.No.2012-012 PC 08/02/12' 5. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion-control plans and any other site • engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 6. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. The new trash enclosure with same building materials as those used to construct the principal building. 7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Site Plan approval is exclusive of all final signs on this site, including new wall (building) signs, which shall remain subject to Chapter 34 of the city ordinances, and subject to the approved Signage Plan of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreements. 9. B6-12 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 10. The Developer shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 11. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center current Standard Specifications and Details. • 12. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City's Engineering Department and applicant shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 13. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. 14. All other provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall remain in effect. Attachments • Planning Commission Resolution No.2012-17 • City Engineer's Review Memo-dated 07120/2012 • Interior/Architectural Plan—Sheet A6 • Phase 2—Site Improvement Plans for Building G(06/28/2012) • Phase II-Conceptual Development Plans(06/28/2012) App.No.2012-012 PC 08/02/12 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 30, 2012 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning specialist FROM: Bruce Johnson,Engineering Technician Supervisor Steve Lillehaug,Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Works Review for Planning Application For Planned Unit Development amendment to-Shingle Creek Crossing Public Works Department staff reviewed the documents submitted for review for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Sites C and G dated June 28, 2012, and provides the following recommendations, comments and conditions for only those changes as shown on the provided plans for Sites C and G: 1. The following comments are contingent upon preliminary and final plat approval and final site plan and land alteration/building permit submittal and approval for Phase 2 of the Shingle Creek Crossing development. 2. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City of Brooklyn Center's standard specifications and details. The City's standard details must be included in the plans. 3. Upon project completion,the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures,and provide certified record drawings for any associated private and/or public improvements prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project. 4. Inspection for the site improvements must be performed by the design/project engineer. Upon project completion and in connection with the certified as-builts,the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer's immediate and direct supervision.The engineer must be certified in the state of Minnesota and must certify all required as-built drawings. 5. A subdivision agreement is required that includes all conditions of the project approval, subject to the final site plan approval by the City Engineer. 6. A fast food type drive thru is not consistent with the original approved PUD. 7. A site plan is required to be submitted as part of this application and review of the PUD Site Plan (Ordinance 35-355)that includes proper dimensioning of drive aisles,parking stalls, curve radii, and other typical site plan dimensioning. This must be provided for evaluation 8. Provide vehicle turning and tracking movement diagrams for delivery vehicles and garbage trucks for all revised sites. 9. The 2-way/ 1-way traffic transition in the SW corner of Pad G needs to be better channelized and delineated. Public Works Review for Planning Application For Page 2 Planned Unit Development amendment to-Shingle Creek Crossing July 30, 2012 • 10.No portion of the building or appurtenant structures may encroach on the City drainage and utility easement. 11.All new curb and gutter must be concrete B6-12 curb and gutter. 12.Provide better pedestrian connectivity to the internal Shingle Creek Crossing sidewalk network. 13.The trash enclosure must be better separated and protected from traffic (e.g. curb and gutter). Prior to Issuance of Land Alteration and Buildinu Permits: 14. Submit a recorded copy of the restrictive covenants(subdivision agreement). 15. Submit final site plans and specifications for review and approval by the City;Engineer in form and format as determined by the City. The final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan. 16. Submit a letter of credit or cash escrow for the land disturbance portion of the project in the amount of 100%of the estimated cost or in the amount determined by City staff to comply with the land alteration permit, site improvements and to restore the site. The developer may submit one itemized letter of credit, if approved by City staff. The City will not release or reduce the letter of credit or cash escrow until work has been completed according to the final site plans approved by the City. 17. A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general • construction activities and management provisions,traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions,tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions,definition of responsibility provisions,temporary parking provisions,overall site condition provisions and non- compliance provisions.The plan must be in a City approved format and must outline P P pp I p Y minimum site management ement practices and penalties for non-compliance. 18. Submit a separate cash escrow for the construction management plan elements as part of the non-compliance provision. This escrow must be accompanied by the agreement and signed by the developer and property owner. Through this document,the developer and property owner will acknowledge: a. The property will be brought into compliance within 24 hours of notification of a violation of the construction management plan,other conditions of approval or City code standards 19. If compliance is not achieved,the City will use any or all of the escrow dollars to correct any deficiency and/or issue. All items, recommendations and conditions are preliminary planned unit development review comments only and are meant to represent and guide the future planning and development of site plans and the corresponding revisions to the property plat and easements that are necessary. All conditions are subject to further review, revision and approval as part of any future re-platting and site plan review: Commissioner Kuykendall introduced the following resolution and moved its • adoption PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-17 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-012 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN -DER SLIK (GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY APPROVING NEW SITE AND BUILDING PLAN FOR PROPOSED BUILDING G (LOCATED ON LOT 11, BLOCK 1, SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING ADDITION— 1180 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012-012 submitted by Loren Van Der Slik (for Gatlin Development Company)requesting approval of a new Site and Building Plan for proposed Building G, located on Lot 11, Block 1, Shingle Creek Crossing Addition, and addressed as 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing, which approval is in conjunction with the ongoing improvements constructed under the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS,the Planning Commission held a public meeting on August 2,2012,to fully consider Planning Commission Application No. 2012-012, and reviewed and received a planning report on the proposed new Site and Building Plans for proposed.Building G and other related improvements;and • WHEREAS the Planning ommission finds that the Site and Building plans are g gp consistent with the General Development Plans of the overall Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that the Site and Building Plan of proposed Building G, as comprehended under Planning Application No. 2012-012, be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The Site and Building Plan is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance; 2. The Site and Building Plan, in relation to the Planned Unit Development . proposed on the Subject Site, will facilitate the redevelop ment and improvement of this site,will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land; 3. The improvements and utilization of the properly as proposed under the planned redevelopment of this site is considered'a reasonable use of the • property and will conform with ordinance standards; PC RESOLUTION NO.2012-17 4. The Site and Building Plan proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city; 5. The Site and Building Plan proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this proposed development can be considered an asset to the community; and 6. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating and approving a Site and Building Plan as contained in Section 35-230 (Plan Approval)of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the site proposal is,therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Planning Application No. 2012-012 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. Developer/Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer's Review memo, dated June 20, 2012, including(but not limited to): • The two-way and one-way traffic transition in the southwest corner a. Y Y of the subject site need to be better channelized and delineated;and I b. The trash enclosures must be better separated and protected from traffic(e.g. curb and gutters). 2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 3. The building and tenant spaces are to be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing systems to meet NFPA standards and connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 4. The location or placement of any fire hydrants and other fire related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief. 5. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 6. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. The new trash • 2 of 4 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-17 enclosure with same building materials as those used to construct the principal building. 7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Site Plan approval is exclusive of all final signs on this site, including new wall (building) signs, which shall remain subject to Chapter 34 of the city ordinances, and subject to the approved Signage Plan of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreements. 9 B6-12 c urb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 10. The Developer shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 11. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall • conform to the City of Brooklyn Center current Standard Specifications and Details. 12. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City's Engineering Department and applicant shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 13. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. 14. All other provisions, standards and variations provided under the,2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall remain in effect. August 2,2012 Date Chair ATTEST: Secretary 3 of 4 PC RESOLUTION NO.2012-17 • The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Leino and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Chair Rahn,Commissioners Kuykendall, Leino;Morgan,Parks, and Schonning and the following voted against the same: None. whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • 4 of 4 • MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION AUGUST 2, 2012 (EXCERPTS) CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Rahn at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Sean Rahn,Commissioners Kara Kuykendall, Stan Leino,Carlos Morgan, Michael Parks, and Stephen Schonning were present. Also present were Councilmember Carol Kleven, S ecret ary to the Planning ing Commission Tim Benetti, Directo r of Business & Development, Gar y Eitel, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Scott Burfeind was absent and excused. APPLICATION NO. 2012-012 LOREN VAN DER SLIK(GATLIN DEVELOPMENT) Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-012, consideration of a proposed Site and Building plan approval related to the proposed "Building G",as illustrated and planned for under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Master Development Plan, located at 1180 Shingle Creek Crossing. Mr. Benetti explained the proposed Building G was originally identified under the May/September 2011 PUD plans as Building C, which was intended to be a 12,225 sf. retail building on a 1.44 acre pad site. The new Bldg. G is planned to be a smaller multi-tenant, mixed use building of 8,420 sf. with virtually same size lot of 1.45 acres. Benetti added that the original pad layout (Bldg._C) was designed to accommodate 55 spaces with a 4.5 parking ratio and the new parking area had to be adjusted to accommodate the added need for the convenience food space Mr. Benetti further explained that access to the site is limited to the main access point off the east/west access road and traffic is limited to one-way along the back (north) and west sides of this site due to the limitations created by the inclusion of the drive-thru lane for the westerly end cap user. He added that City Engineers have indicated some concerns of this in their review and have asked for better channelization and delineation of traffic in the southwest portion of this site. Mr. Benetti pointed out Building G is planned to be stone veneers, EIFS, concrete brick veneers, integrally colored rock face block, spandrel glass and other materials. These proposed architectural materials are consistent with the previously approved Architectural Standards (including materials)the City called for under the original PUD Agreement. Chair Rahn invited the applicant to come forward for questions. Mr. Luke Payne, consultant engineer with Kimley-Horn Associates and representing Gatlin Development again presented himself for questions. PC 8-2-12 Commissioner Kuykendall asked for clarification on the location of the trash enclosures. Mr. • Payne explained that with one way circulation, it was the best way to position them on the site. Commissioner Kuykendall stated that they appear to be skewed and look really awkward. She asked the applicant if he could take a look at them and find a better location on the site for the trash enclosures to keep them out of view. Commissioner Parks asked about the layout and direction of the building. Mr. Payne explained that the building is four sided architecture and while the customer side will face into the development site, all four sides look the same. Commissioner Parks feels the tenants will be more successful if the false building facades have lights in them. He added that he agrees the trash enclosures should be out of view and away from the building or indoors. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-17 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-012 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK (GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) APPROVING NEW SITE AND BUILDING PLAN FOR PROPOSED BUILDING G (LOCATED ON LOT 11 BLOCK 1 SHINGLE CREEK • CROSSING ADDITION—1180 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Leino, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-17. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners, Kuykendall, Leino, Morgan, Parks and Schonning And the following voted against the same None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its August 13, 2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration: DISCUSSION ITEM There were no discussion items. OTHER BUSINESS Chair Rahn shared highlights from the Shingle Creek/West Mississippi Watershed meeting which he and Commissioners Burfeind and Schonning attended. Commissioner Schonning also shared highlights from the meeting. PC 8-2-12 There was further discussion by the Commission regarding watershed issues, rain gardens and other issues related to water flow and infiltration. Commissioner Kuykendall stated she would like to address concerns with vacant commercial properties and how they are maintained at a future meeting. There was no other business. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall,to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:1O P.M. PC 8-2-12 • City Council Agenda Item No. 10a • • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: August 9, 2012 • TO: City Council FROM: Curt Boganey, City ManagA SUBJECT: Resolution receiving proposed charter amendment and calling a special election thereon Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval/adoption of the proposed resolution accepting the proposed charter amendment and calling a special meeting Tuesday November 6th 2012. Background: At the regular City Council Meeting of July 23rd, the Council adopted a motion directing staff to prepare a resolution accepting the Charter Commission recommendation and calling a special election thereon. (Minutes enclosed) The City has prepared the resolution as directed. In addition four election question alternatives as discussed at the July 23rd meeting. The Council must determine the wording for the election question. The Council is not limited to the four alternatives but the question should be consistent with State Statue as discussed in the Attorney memo. Budget Issues: The proposed election will be current with the previously scheduled general election. The additional cost will not be substantial. The current budget will absorb these costs. Council Goals: charteccommission.ward.resolution • Mission:Ensuring an attractive,,clean,safe,inclusive conununity that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust ELECTION QUESTION ALTERNATIVES 1. Shall the Brooklyn Center City Charter amendment be adopted? 2. Shall the Brooklyn Center City Charter amendment requiring election of all city council members by ward be adopted? 2a. Shall the Brooklyn Center City Charter amendment be adopted requiring election of all city council members by ward? 3. Shall the Brooklyn Center City Charter amendment establishing a ward system for city government be adopted? 4. Shall the Brooklyn Center City Charter amendment be adopted changing the form of city government to a ward system for the election of city council members? • • 408381v1 CLL BR291-7 • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION THEREON BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota("City")as follows: 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the Brooklyn Center Charter Commission has duly submitted a proposed amendment to the City's Charter,which amendment would require the election of Council Members by ward, all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12, and that therefore an election thereon shall be held as hereinafter provided. 2. The proposed charter amendment will be submitted to the voters of the City at the special election to be held(as part of the general election)on Tuesday,November 6, 2012. The election will be held and conducted in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota relating to municipal elections and the City's home rule charter. • 3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of election or sample ballot, or both, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A to be posted and published as required by law and as follows: (a) The notice of election, including the complete text of the proposed charter amendment, will be published in the official newspaper of the City once a week for two successive weeks prior to the election; (b) The notice of election and a sample ballot will be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least four days prior to the election and a sample ballot will be posted at each polling place on election day;and (c) The sample ballot will be published in the official newspaper at least one week prior to the election. (d) The City Clerk will provide written notice of the election to the Hennepin County Auditor at least 74 days before the election,including the date of the election and title and language for the ballot question. 4. The polling places, hours of election and the respective judges for the election will be those established by the City for general elections. The polls will be open from 7:00 a.m.until 8:00 p.m. 5. (a) The City Clerk is authorized and directed to prepare the ballot in substantially the following form, subject to the terms of Section 5(b)hereof- 4081090 CLL BP291-7 I • CITY QUESTION BALLOT SPECIAL ELECTION CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER November 6,2012 INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS: To vote for a question,fill in the oval next to the word"YES"for that question. To vote against a question,fill in the oval next to the word"NO"for that question. CITY QUESTION NO. 1: PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT Shall the City of Brooklyn Center City Charter amendment 9 O YES O NO • 4081090 CLL BR291-7 2 • (b) The City Clerk is authorized and directed to prepare ballots pursuant to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 206.61. The City Clerk will provide each polling place with at least two sample ballots which are facsimiles of the card to be voted on in that precinct, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 206.62. 6. The City Council shall meet in the City Hall on November 13, 2012, at 5:45 p.m., C.T.to canvass the results of the election and to declare the results thereof. By Order of the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center this day of ,2012. Tim Willson,Mayor ATTEST: Sharon Knutson,City Clerk • The motion for the adoption on of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. 4081090 CLL BR291-7 3 • EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF SPECIAL ELECTION CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special election will be held in and for the City of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota, on Tuesday, the 6t' day of November, 2012, at which the following proposition will be submitted to the voters of the City for their approval or rejection: PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT Shall the City of Brooklyn Center City Charter amendment The polling places for said election are as follows: Precinct 1 Earle Brown Elementary School, 1500 59th Ave N Precinct 2 Brooklyn Center High School, 6500 Humboldt Ave N • Precinct 3 Evergreen Park Elementary School,7020 Dupont Ave N Precinct 4 St.Alphonsus Church,7025 Halifax Ave N Precinct 5 Garden City Elementary School, 3501 65th Ave N Precinct 6 Brookdale Covenant Church, 5139 Brooklyn Blvd Precinct 7 Odyssey Academy Charter School, 6201 Noble Ave N The polls for said election will be open at 7:00 a.m. and will remain open until closing at 8:00 p.m. Any qualified registered voter of the City is entitled to vote at said election at the polling place for the precinct in which the voter resides, and any resident of the City not previously registered as a voter may register on election day. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL City Clerk i Dated: ,2012. 4081090 CLL BR291-7 4 • STATE OF MINNESOTA ) . COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ) I,the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on 2012, with the original thereof on file in my office and the same is a full, true and correct copy thereof, insofar as the same relates to the calling of a special election for a proposed amendment to the charter of the City. WITNESS My hand as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 2012. • City Clerk City of Brooklyn Center,Minnesota (SEAL) • 4081090 CLL BP291-7 5 • PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT REGARDING WARD SYSTEM Mr. Boganey introduced the item and described the proposed Charter amendments to Sections 2.02, Boards and Commissions; 2.03a, Elective Officers; 2.03b. Wards; and, 2.03c Redistrict Procedures. The Charter Commission has requested, in accordance with State Law, to place this question on the November 2012 ballot. Under State law, the City Council is required to adopt a resolution, set a date for the election, and determine the ballot question. That resolution will be presented to the City Council at its August 13, 2012,meeting. Mayor Willson referenced the Charter Commission meeting minutes and e-mail from a Charter Commissioner and asked whether the City Council had received proper notice from the Charter Commission. City specify y Attorney Charlie LeFevere advised that State Law does a procedure that an officer has to submit a certain document in a certain way. The City Manager has communicated with the Charter Commission to assure the City has the proper form of proposed Charter amendment approved by the Charter Commission and the meeting minutes show the vote that was taken. Mr. LeFevere advised the Charter Commission has substantially complied with the statutory requirements. Mr. LeFevere noted August 24, 2012, is the last date for the City Council to act to get notice to the Hennepin County Auditor for placement on the November 6, 2012, ballot. The Council is required by law to call the election and determine the form of ballot question on which the voters will act. Mr. LeFevere noted a Charter Commissioner had submitted a suggested form of . question he deemed appropriate but that is the decision of the City Council. The purpose of the question is not to educate or characterize the Charter amendment in any particular way. Mr. LeFevere advised the text of the amendment has to be published twice by the City and there may be other additional efforts to educate the public on the text. The intent is to identify the question clearly and differentiate it from other ballot questions at the same election. Mr. LeFevere offered one form of question: "Shall the proposed new Charter amendment be adopted?' Or, to make it clear that this amendment relates to the Brooklyn Center Charter amendment: "Shall the Brooklyn Center Chart_er amendment requiring election of all City Council Members by ward be adopted?' The Council discussed the proposed Charter amendments and noted there are actually two questions: election of City Council Members by ward; and, method that board and commission membership is determined. Mr. LeFevere noted to assure the question is not misleading, it may be better to state: "Should the Brooklyn Center Charter amendment be adoptedT' The Council discussed how the question should be worded and agreement was reached that the proposed Charter amendments all relate to a ward system change. It was noted that a Charter Commissioner was not in attendance to address the issue. Mayor Willson offered wording indicating: "Shall the Brooklyn Center Charter amendment establishing a ward system be add?" Councilmember Lasman supported using the word "change" to alert voters that the amendment under consideration it is a change to the current Charter. She suggested wording such as: "Shall • the Brooklyn Center Charter be changed to require all Council Members to be elected by a ward system?" Mayor Willson and each Councilmember stated their support for the current system that allowed those seeking office to campaign through the entire City, for the City's elected officials to represent all Brooklyn Center residents, and be concerned with issues impacting all of its citizens. It was noted a ward system may create an easier and less expensive process to campaign in only one-quarter of the City; however, it is of benefit to the City's residents to be represented by five members on the City Council as opposed to one ward member and an at- large Mayor. In addition, a ward system is more appropriate for larger cities/school districts where it is impossible to meet all of the residents and be aware of all issues of concern. The Council acknowledged that the City's Charter is to the City what the Constitution is to the United States of America so great care was appropriate when considering an amendment. It was pointed out that the option of a ward system had been discussed by the Charter Commission three times since 1973; however, the decision had been made each time that the current system was best for the residents of Brooklyn Center. The City Council indicated it has had virtually no input on the Charter Commission's consideration and while there has been no outcry from the community addressing this issue, the Charter Commission has the prerogative to place this question on the ballot and the public will have the final say in how it will be resolved. Councilmember Lasman moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to direct staff to prepare a • resolution accepting the Charter Commission recommendation and calling a special election thereon. Motion passed unanimously. • COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM • DATE: July 19,2012 TO: City Council FROM: Curt Boganey, City Manage SUBJECT: Charter Amendment-Wards Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider directing staff to prepare a resolution accepting a recommendation from the Charter Commission and setting an election date to consider the proposed Charter Amendment to establish a ward system in the City Of Brooklyn Center Background: On July 16th I received an email form Mr. Gary Brown indicating that the Charter Commission had approved recommended changes es to the City Charter per the minutes of June 28 th 2012.. I have enclosed a copy of the minutes of June 28th, June 13 th and May 10 th 2012 meetings,where this topic was discussed by the Commission. It appears that the Commission may have voted to approve amendments to Section 2.03a Elective Officers, Section 2.093b Wards, Section 2.03c • Redistricting Procedures, 2.03d Annual Meetings and Section 2.02 Boards and Commissions as described in the attachment to the June 13th 2012 meeting minutes. I have sent an email to Mr. Brown requesting clarification on the Commission's official action. As you will note there is nothing in the June 28th minutes that state what the commission actually voted on and approved. Hopefully this information will be available for the work session. This item has been placed on the worksession so that you will have an opportunity to review and understand what requirements and options are available to the Council. Assuming that we do receive the final language from the Commission, to meet the deadlines for the next general election an item will be placed on the next City Council meeting for action. The City Council will be asked to receive the recommendation, set the date for the election and to determine'the ballot question. The City Attorney is preparing information that in more detail describes 'the mandatory requirements,the process and the options available to the City Council. Policy Issues: Council Goals: charter.ward.amendment n?ission.Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive cortununity that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Curt Boganey �rom: gary-julie-brown @comcast.net ent: Monday,July 16, 2012 2:44 PM To: Sharon Knutson;Curt Boganey;Charlie LeFevere Cc: Stan Leino Subject: Re:Charter Commission Minutes for June 28,.2012 1 believe it is the intention of the Charter Commission that the question be something like the following; "Should the city charter be amended to require that all city council members be elected to represent wards rather than all council members and the Mayor being elected at- large?" Gary E Brown Cell: 763-464-1549 From: gary Julie-brown(cbcomcast.net To: "Sharon Knutson" <sknutson(a)ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us>,"Curt Boganey" cbog (a� anew ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us>, "Charlie LeFevere" <clefevere(,Ken nedy- �raven.com> Cc: "Stan Leino" <flyfinn7 rnsn.com> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 8:24:49 AM Subject: Charter Commission Minutes for June 28, 2012 Please note proposed changes to the Charter in the minutes. Gary E Brown Cell: 763-464-1549 1 (Draft) MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 2012 BROOKLYN CENTER CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING Called to order by Chairman Stan Leino at 6:30 PM. Roll Call: Secretary Gary Brown called roll: Gary Brown,Ellen Davis (arrived at 7:47), Mark Goodell, Stan Leino,Robert Marvin,Harold Middleton,Mary O'Connor, Eileen Oslund,Eric Pone,Bee Yang and Mark Yelich were present. Excused Absence: Gail Ebert Absent: Renita Whicker Consideration of Minutes: Motion by Yelich, seconded by Marvin to approve minutes of June 13,2012, approved unanimously 10=0. Old Business: Consideration of Amendment to Adopt Ward System for City Council Seats Chairman Leino invited residents who desired to address the charter commission to speak: Michael Parks, 3218 64"'Ave.N.,indicated he had a problem with the city's at-large council representation because he believed that the at-large representation was illegal according to previous federal court cases. Dan Ryan, 6442 Indiana Ave., (Council Member), indicated that Parks had made several allegations regarding the legality of the at-large system presently in place in Brooklyn Center as well as many S other cities, should be addressed by the city attorney. He indicated that he felt that the minorities were spread throughout the city and the premise of non representation was not founded. . Former Mayor Phil Cohen, 5501 Humboldt Avenue N., does not like the fact that if we changed to ward system he could only vote for 25% of the council. He believes that the demographics should be checked. He felt that Park's proposal dilutes the representation. Chairman Leino then closed the meeting for citizen input and opened commission discussion; Pone disagreed with all three citizens, against bi-polar government-African Americans are not invited to the table(to be elected),wants more people to believe they can run and be elected to the city council. Leino doesn't want to change for change sake but wants citizen's to decide. Goodell: How does at-large system create barriers to access to the council? Pone wants to make council bigger and representation more"local". Marvin wants council members more responsive to the citizens. Middleton is concerned about proximity of council members to each other. Marvin feels Parks' letter is not relevant. Brown stated that all of the townships in Minnesota and Wisconsin are elected at large,Parks' points are not valid. Oslund asked if we know if voters vote for people running for council in the same geographic area that they live in? Dan Ryan then added that lines on a map do not generate more people voting. Yelich passed around the updated proposed changes to the charter. He stated that he was concerned p p p p about the cost of making the changes,that this was a significant undertaking,household incomes were low in Brooklyn Center, and that it was hard to find enough time to run for council. He further pointed out the city's goal of cultural diversity and that many people do not vote for two • candidates even though they can to make sure their candidate is elected. Motion by Yelich that Charter Commission send the issue to the council for consideration. Brown offered a friendly amendment to the motion to pass a resolution asking the city council to put on the ballot this fall as we know what the city council's position is, seconded by Marvin. Pone does not feel the proposed changes go far enough. Motion fails 8-2 with O'Connor and Goodell opposing passage(requires two thirds of entire commission for passage). Eminent Domain: Dan Ryan asked why Charter Commission has this as an issue as he does not see a problem? Where is the mischief to be remedied? He then read a statement. Commissioner Brown asked Ryan if he would be willing to offer an ordinance to deal with the commission's concerns? Ryan indicated that he could not speak for the entire council but would be willing to offer the ordinance to the council for consideration. Mayor Cohen pointed out where the city council has made several good uses of eminent domain. Marvin did not agree that these were good uses. Commissioner Ellen Davis arrived to the meeting. Goodell asked the Chair to give an overview of the issue which the Chairman Leino did. Davis thinks that 60 days is more than enough time. Marvin does not like the indefinite length of time. O'Connor stated a concern that the city is forced to purchase the property within 90 days the way the current verbiage is written. Pone will not support any condemnation amendments and that elected officials are just presenting excuses. Oslund concerned about two issues going to the voters. Middleton stated that citizens cannot comprehend these complicated issues. Goodell there are many variables but he is not opposed to eminent domain. Chairman Leino asked for a motion. Yelich state that general public does not see eminent domain as a tool. Motion by Marvin, seconded by Pone,to consider amendments one by one. Motion passed 10-1 with Leino voting nay. Motion by Brown, seconded by Middleton to not make any changes to Chapter 9. Motion passed 10-1 with Yelich voting nay. Motion by Yelich, seconded by Marvin to amend Chapter 2 for Charter Changes that would allow Council Members to be elected by Ward versus At-large and pass onto Brooklyn Center City Council for a vote on the ballot this fall. Motion by Pone, seconded by Marvin,to call the question,passes 11-0. Original motion then voted on, and passes 9-2 with O'Connor and Goodell voting nay. Motion passes with required 2/3 majority. Future Meeting Dates: Next meeting.July 26, 2012. Adjournment: Motion to adjourn at 8:49 PM by Yelich seconded by Brown,passed 11.-0. Submitted for consideration, Gary E. Brown, Secretary (Draft) MINUTES OF JUNE 139 2012 BROOKLYN CENTER CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING Called to order by Chairman Stan Leino at 6:32 PM. Commissioner Lackner Removed: Chairman Leino announced that Secretary Brown had received a letter informing him that Commissioner Nathan Lackner had been removed as a Charter Commission member by the Chief Judge of the Fourth Judicial District,James T. Swenson,on June 8,2012,for lack of attendance. Roll Call: Secretary Gary Brown called roll; Gary Brown, Stan Leino, Gail Ebert,Robert Marvin(arrived at 6:40),Ed Nelson, Mary O'Connor,Eileen Oslund,Eric Pone,and Mark Yelich were present. Excused Absence: Harold Middleton, Renita Whicker Absent: Ellen Davis and Bee Yang Consideration of Minutes: Motion by Pone, seconded by Yelich to approve minutes of May 10,2012, approved unanimously 9-0. Old Business: Eminent Domain: City Attorney,Mr. Charlie LeFevere reported that the City Council did not approve the Commission's proposed changes to Chapter 9,Eminent Domain. He suggested that there may be some middle ground between the City Council's and Charter Commission's positions. He then listed a number of issues that the proposed changes might impact the City's Eminent Domain process (abatement of nuisances,partial takings and appraisals ahead of time). He suggested that the Commission could possibly follow the Federal guidelines as they relate to Uniform Relocation Act. He suggested that he could prepare a checklist of items for consideration by the Commission. A number of Commissioners asked questions of the City Attorney. Motion by Brown, seconded by Nelson,to direct the City Attorney to prepare a checklist for Charter Commission consideration at the next meeting,passed 8-1 with Pone voting nay. It was pointed out by the City Attorney that the City Council was obligated to phrase and put forward the question regarding Charter Commission's proposed changes related to Eminent Domain to the voters. Motion by O'Connor, seconded by Yelich to strike the last sentence of 9.04, several members spoke in opposition to the motion until the City Attorney's comments had been received. Motion to call the question by Yelich, seconded by Pone, approved unanimously 9-0. Motion was then voted on and was defeated 1-8 with O'Connor voting yea. Motion by Brown, seconded by Marvin to wait for City Attorney's checklist offering"middle ground", passed unanimously 9-0. Ward vs. At-large City Council Members: Several interested residents were then afforded time to speak to the issue by Chairman Leino: Former Mayor Phil Cohen, 5501 Humboldt Avenue N., suggested the Commission wait for more input and possibly hold a Public Hearing. Judy Thorbus, 6265 Brooklyn Drive,paper did not cover all of the issues, opposed to wards,likes the at-large system and thinks it works well. At-large is a safety net and she believes that City Council's open microphone"Open Mike" gives residents an opportunity to be heard about issues. Tim Franklin,6718 Bryant Ave.N.,thanked the commission for their work thus far on the Ward vs. At-large issue. Ruby.Dallas, 6419 Emerson Ave.N.,feels strongly that residents are not represented by the at-large form of Council. She expressed concerns about representation of the diverse community. City Attorney, Charlie LeFevere,listed many pros and cons for both ward Councils and at-large Councils. He did not believe that there were many ward Councils of cities the size of Brooklyn Center. He believed that ward Councils.were typically from larger communities. Commissioner Brown pointed out several communities that he had worked for that were considerably smaller than Brooklyn Center. LeFevere pointed out that a person running for City Council can finish second in an election and still be on the City Council. He did not believe that a ward system would have an impact upon the makeup of the City Council as demonstrated by an all female council just a few years ago. The City Attorney then informed the Charter Commission that any question being put before the voters had to be to the City Council by August 24,however the last City Council meeting prior to August 24 will be August 13,2012. City Council Member Dan Ryan, 6442 Indiana Ave.N.stated that he had overriding concerns that voters will not understand the issue and that this change to the charter would add unnecessary administrative detail. He also spoke about the Chapter 9 proposed changes and that State Law supersedes the charter and the ways that(land)takings get paid for,would be impacted. Commission Member and subcommittee member Yelich passed out a revised Chapter 2 Ward vs.At-Large • proposed Charter Changes which was then moved by Pone, seconded by Marvin for consideration. Yelich proposed a friendly amendment to remove Section 2.03d ANNUAL MEETINGS and then send to the City Council. Considerable discussion followed. Motion by Brown, seconded by Marvin,to call the question, motion passed unanimously 9-0. Original Motion was not carried as a result of 7 yeas and 2 nays (Nelson and O Connor). Motion by Yelich, seconded by Marvin,to place on next Charter Commission Agenda,7 yeas and 2 nays(Pone and O'Connor). Future Meeting Dates: Next Meeting June 28th at 6:30 PM and the meeting immediately after to be on July 26. Commissioner Nelson will no longer be on the Charter Commission as he has now served his last meeting since his tem ends on June 26,2012. Secretary Brown directed to check to see if there were any commissioners who have three unexcused meetings in a row. Adjournment: Motion by Marvin,seconded by Yelich to adjourn at 9:38, approved unanimously 9-0. Submitted for consideration, Gary E. Brown,Secretary • Chapter 2 Amendment Brooklyn Center City Charter June 13, 2012 Draft Section 2.03a ELECTIVE OFFICERS. The Counth'al omposed of a Mayor and four Council members who shall be registere`' voters of -;sboklyn Center. The Mayor and whe shall be elected at larg . q d each other Co .. jiJ member shall be elected from one each of four different o .,ra hic 61v wards.�� ,erson elected from a particular ward must reside in that d each Council NW- - shall serve for a term of four(4) yea ifi,' : Mayor sha I°nerve for a term of four(4) years. The Council shall be canva�er�s o"t:a electio 'of the Mayor and the Council members. 4 Section 2.03b WAI?eD. The yty shall bey. i ` ed into'four wards generally corresponding to t xhur geographic galw"drants of the city. A ward is composed of a compartand, tr�u cono stern :oru. CAcil members from two of the wards shall bJa ted t ::§ :`nears prior or tvo'� ea,rMter Council members from the othero wards. s , Section 2 I EDISTRICTIN,G PROD DURES. The boundaries of the wards are established by ordinance Tie population of the wards must be as equal as practical, with a var4ance oflo greater, or no less, than five percent of the equal_ number. If a federalcNeps ; .>shows that a ward no longer meets this requirement the council must changthe ward boundaries to achieve compliance within the time period required by state law. If a ward boundary change places a ward council member's residence in a different ward the council member will continue in office until the next general municipal election, at which time the office must be filled for the remainder of that term. • Section 2.03d ANNUAL MEETINGS. Each ward council member shall hold at least two citizen meetings for their ward annually for purpose of receiving citizen input from ward residents. Section 2.02 BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. The e s ;all be no separate administrative board of health, library boar- k board-, or any other administrative board or commission, exctfor civil servicemmissions and boards and for the administrations of a ction jointly withbnother political subdivision. The Council shall itself be an d:. rformak:e duties andexercise the powers of such boards and co ° :: issions. Thjo i1 may, however;establish boards or commissions to adviset: e council with:.: S Ke*gto ct to any municipal function or activity, to investigate .ny su'b�et�.of inte the City, or to perform uasi-'udicial functo s• Such adviso: u boam `ions shall have its q 1 membership a ua.rh: :comd of at M a member nominated b each ward Council member an she May may noate the remaining members. '; ��x 4 114h, "x x, i MINUTES OF May 10, 2012 • BROOKLYN CENTER CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING Called to order by Chairman Stan Leino at 6:40 PM. Roll Call: Secretary Gary Brown called roll; Gary Brown, Stan Leino, Gail Ebert,Robert Marvin,Ed Nelson,Mary O'Connor,Eileen Oslund,Eric Pone, and Mark Yelich were present. Excused Absence: Harold Middleton Absent: Ellen Davis,Nathan Lackner,Renita Whicker, and Bee Yang Consideration of Minutes Motion by Marvin, seconded by Ebert to approve minutes of January 19,2012 and February 4,2012 (combining the two commission meetings),unanimously approved 9-0. Motion by Marvin and seconded by Pone to approve April 12, 2012,minutes as submitted,approved unanimously 9-0. Old Business: Attendance of Commissioner Lackner. Secretary Brown reported that he had sent a letter to Commissioner Nathan Lackner on April 16th regarding missing three consecutive meetings,but he did not receive a response by mail or by phone. Motion by Yelich, seconded by Pone to direct secretary Brown to contact District g diar Judge regarding absences of Commissioner Nathan Lackner,recommending that Commissioner g Lackner be removed from the Commission due to lack of attendance, approved unanimously 9-0. SProposed changes to Charter regarding Eminent Domain. After discussion by several commissioners, a motion by Marvin seconded by Yelich to ask City attorney prepare language to place on the ballot(if city council rejects proposed changes. Chairman Leino opened the floor to discussion and after all commissioners had an opportunity to speak a motion to call the question by Brown, seconded by Marvin, passed unanimously 9-0. The original motion was then voted'on and approved unanimously 9-0. Presentation by Michael Parks 3218 64th Ave.N.,Brooklyn Center. Mr. Parks spoke about the diverse community but lack of diversity on the City Council. He indicated that he felt that as a result of the entire City Council and Mayor being elected at-large that it was difficult to know who to talk about a problem. He stated that it required talking to all council members. He felt that the citizens needed better access to the council. He pointed out that council members seem to reside in the same area of the city. He expressed concern of the legality of at-large representation versus ward representation. He also spoke of the difficulty to run for council since you have to canvass the entire city not just one portion that you would represent. He felt it was expensive to run city wide and that people get discouraged. He felt an amendment to the charter calling for ward representation would make Brooklyn Center a better place to live. New Business: Council decision on Chapter 9 No action was taken after discussion. Subcommittee on At-lame vs.Ward Representation The subcommittee consisting of Yelich,Pone,Ebert,and Marvin,gave their report with recommendations to divide the city into 4 wards,maintaining the same number of council members,and with the Mayor still being elected at-large. They further presented language that included • having the council members having more influence on the appointments to various boards and commissions.Motion by Nelson,seconded by Yelich to accept the report,approved unanimously 9-0. The commission then worked on minor language changes to the proposed amendment to the Charter Section 2;Section 202 Boards and Commissions, 2.03a Elective Officers,203b Wards,203c Redistricting Procedures,and Section 203d Annual Meetings(see attached). • Future Meeting Dates: The next meeting will held on June 13 at 6:30 PM,with the Chairman given discretion to reschedule due to timing of possible charter question on the ballot. Adjournment: Motion by Brown,seconded by Yelich to adjourn at 8:55, approved unanimously 9-0. Submitted for consideration, Gary E. Brown, Secretary Chapter 2 Amendment Brooklyn Center City Charter Approved by Brooklyn Center Charter Commission June 28, 2012 Section 2.03a ELECTIVE OFFICERS. The Council shall be composed of a Mayor and four Council members who shall be registered voters of Brooklyn Center. The Mayor and shall be elected at large and each other Council member shall be elected from one each of four different geographic city wards A person elected from a particular ward must reside in that ward. Each Council member shall serve for a term of four(4) years. The Mayor shall serve for a term of four(4) years. The Council shall be canvassers of the election of the Mayor and the Council members. Section 2.03b WARDS The city shall be divided into four wards generally corresponding to the four geographic quadrants of the city. A ward is composed of a compact and contiguous territory. Council members from two of the wards shall be elected two years prior or two years after Council members from the other two wards. Section 2.03c REDISTRICTING PROCEDURES The boundaries of the wards are established by ordinance The population of the wards must be as equal as practical, with a variance of no greater, or no less, than five percent of the equal number. If a federal census shows that a ward no longer meets this requirement, the council must change the ward boundaries to achieve compliance within the time period required by state law. If a ward boundary change places a ward council member's residence in a different ward,the council member will continue in office until the next general municipal election, at which time the office must be filled for the remainder of that term. Section 2.02 BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. There shall be no separate administrative board of health, library board, park board, or any other administrative board or commission, except for civil service commissions and boards and for the administrations of a function jointly with another political subdivision. The Council shall itself be and perform the duties and exercise the powers of such boards and commissions. The Council may, however, establish boards or commissions to advise the Council with respect to any municipal function or activity,to investigate any subject of interest to the City, or to perform quasi-judicial functions. Such advisory boards or commissions shall have its membership equally composed of one or more members nominated by each ward Council member and the remaining members nominated by the Mayor. q Charles L.LeFevere • 470 US Bank Plaza t eg 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 ` (612)337-9215 telephone (612)337-9310 fax �l a clefevere@kennedy-graven.com http://www.kennedy-%raven.com CHARTERED MEMORANDUM ' Date: July 23,2012 To: Curt Boganey From: Charles LeFevere Re: CharterAmendment Question The last day for the city council to notify the county auditor of an election question is 72 days before the election,which,this year,would be August 24,2012. Therefore, at the first council meeting in August, the council should adopt a resolution setting the • election question and calling for a special election on the charter amendment,to be held at the same time as the general election in November. The form of the ballot question is set by the city council. The purpose of the ballot question is not to educate voters about the amendment. In the case of a new charter,the statute specifies the form of the question, which is simply: "Shall the proposed new charter be adopted?" The public is informed about the substance of the amendment by publishing the text of the proposed amendment at least twice in the official newspaper. Rather,the purpose of the question,as set forth in Minn. Stat. §410.12,Subd.4 is as follows: "The statement of the question on the ballot shall be sufficient to identify the amendment clearly and to distinguish the question from every other question on the ballot at the same time." There will be.several questions on the ballot this fall. Therefore,it seems to me that, at a minimum,the ballot question should make it clear that this question relates to the Brooklyn Center City Charter (as opposed, for example, to the Minnesota Constitution). A minimal question might be: "Shall the Brooklyn Center City Charter amendment be adopted?" A question providing some more detail to identify the question being voted on could be: "Shall the Brooklyn Center City Charter amendment requiring election of all city council members by ward be adopted?" The city council does not have to decide this issue until its first August meeting. At that time, it will be required to call the special election and to set the form of the question. A preliminary draft of that resolution and one form of ballot question is attached. However,this matter should be discussed by the . city council and proposed for adoption of a resolution on August 13,2012. Charlie 408101v1 CLL BR291-7 1 • Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION THEREON BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center,Hennepin County, Minnesota("City")as follows: 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the Brooklyn Center Charter Commission has duly submitted a proposed amendment to the City's Charter,which amendment would require the election of Council Members by ward, all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12, and that therefore an election thereon shall be held as hereinafter provided. 2. The proposed charter amendment will be submitted to the voters of the City at the special election to be held(as part of the general election)on Tuesday,November 6, 2012. The election will be held and conducted in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota relating to municipal elections and the City's home rule charter. • 3. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of election or sample ballot, or both, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A to be posted and published as required by law and as follows: (a) The notice of election, including the complete text of the proposed charter amendment, will be published in the official newspaper of the City once a week for two successive weeks prior to the election; (b) The notice of election and a sample ballot will be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least four days prior to the election and a sample ballot will be posted at each polling place on election day; and (c) The sample ballot will be published in the official newspaper at least one week prior to the election. (d) The City Clerk will provide written notice of the election to the Hennepin County Auditor at least 74 days before the election, including the date of the election and title and language for the ballot question. 4. The polling places, hours of election and the'respective judges for the election will be those established by the City for general elections. The polls will be open from 7:00 a.m.until 8:00 p.m. 5. (a) The City Clerk is authorized and directed to prepare the ballot in substantially the following form, subject to the terms of Section 5(b)hereof: 408109v1 CLLBR291-7 1 • CITY QUESTION BALLOT SPECIAL ELECTION CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER November 6,2012 INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS: To vote for a question, fill in the oval next to the word"YES"for To vote against a question,fill in the oval next to the word"NO"for that question. that question. g q , CITY QUESTION NO. 1: PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT Shall the City of Brooklyn Center Charter amendment requiring election of all city council members by ward be adopted? O YES O NO • 4081090 CLL BR291-7 2 • The City lerk is authorized and directed to prepare ballots pursuant to the ro) requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 206.61. The City Clerk will provide each polling place with at least two sample ballots which are facsimiles of the card to be voted on in that precinct, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 206.62. 6. The City Council shall meet in the City Hall on November, 2012, at p.m.,C.T.to canvass the results of the election and to declare the results thereof. By Order of the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center this day of ,2012. Tim Willson,Mayor ATTEST: Sharon Knutson,City Clerk • The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. • 408109v1 CLLBR291-7 3 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF SPECIAL ELECTION CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special election will be held in and for the City of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota, on Tuesday, the 6t' day of November, 2012, at which the following proposition will be submitted to the voters of the City for their approval or . rejection: PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT Shall the City of Brooklyn Center Charter amendment requiring election of all city council members by ward be adopted? The polling places for said election are as follows: The polls for said election will be open at 7:00 a.m. and will remain open until closing at 8:00 p.m. Any qualified registered voter of the City is entitled to vote at said election at the polling place for the precinct in which the voter resides, and any resident of the City not, previously registered as a voter may register on election day. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL City Clerk Dated: ,2012. • 408109v1 CLL BR291-7 4 . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ) I,the undersigned,being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on 2012, with the original thereof on file in my office and the same is a full,true and correct copy thereof, insofar as the same relates to the calling of.a special election for a proposed amendment to the charter of the City. WITNESS My hand as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of 2012. • City Clerk City of Brooklyn Center,Minnesota (SEAL) • 408109v1 CLLBM91-7 5 Work Session Agenda i . AGENDA CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION August 13, 2012 Immediately Following Regular City Council and EDA Meetings Which Start at 7:00 P.M. Council Chambers City Hall A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary. ACTIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS 1.Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study Update 2.Earle Brown and Opportunity Area Street Light Replacement Update 3.Environmental Response Funds Councilmember Lasman PENDING LIST FOR FUTURE WORK SESSIONS Later/Ongoing 1.National League of Cities Service Line Program 2.Sister City Update 3.Success Target Update Work Session Agenda Item No. 1 MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE: August 7, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City.Engineer. SUBJECT: Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study Update Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider and provide comment pertaining to the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study draft report memorandums. Background: On June 11, 2012, City Council directed staff to continue efforts. pertaining to the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study and supported conducting an open house for the corridor study. On June 19, 2012, the first public open house was held, and a summary of the comments received are available on the City's website that can be found under the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study project page. Subsequently, the study's consultant has updated and prepared drafts of the Vision and Goals and Existing Conditions Report dated July 2012, the Traffic Analysis Memorandum dated July 23, 2012, and the Future Recommended Concepts Report dated August 2012 for further review and consideration by the City and the technical advisory committee (TAC). These full documents are also available on the City's website. On August 15, 2012, the TAC will meet to review and provide comment to these documents. Attached for the Council's review and comment are the Vision and Goals p ortion and the Recommended Concepts Report. An overview of the draft documents will be presented to the City Council. The remaining project tasks generally include: cost estimating, developing an implementation plan, holding a second open house, special property owner meeting(s) as needed, continued TAC review, Planning Commission review, other miscellaneous measures to finalize the study and eventual final consideration by the City Council. Policy Issues: Are the City Council's expectations being met pertaining to project progress? Does the City Council have any comments pertaining to the draft documents? Council Goals: Strategic: 1. We will proceed aggressively with implementation of City's redevelopment plans 7. We will continue to maintain the city's infrastructure improvements i A ission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safes inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust i Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study Vision and Goals Existing Conditions Final Draft City of Brooklyn Center Prepared by: LI k'14 I Consulting Group,Inc. July 2012 SRF No.7589 Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................1 Vision...........................................................................................................................................2 Demographics.............................................................................................................................6 Context...................................................................................................................6 ExistingConditions................................................................................................6 LandUse......................................................................................................................................8 Context..........................................................................................................:........8 Existing.Conditions................................................................................................8 Transit........................................................................................................................................10 Context.................................................................................................................10 ExistingConditions..............................................................................................10 Trails and Sidewalks.................................................................................................................16 Context.................................................................................................................16 ExistingConditions..............................................................................................16 Traffic, Safety, and Access......................................................................................................24 Background..........................................................................................................24 Existing Traffic Volumes.....................................................................................24 Environmental and Cultural Constraints................................................................................32 Context.................................................................................................................32 ExistingConditions..............................................................................................32 BRooKLYN BOULEVARD STUDY SRF Consulting Group,Inc. Introduction Brooklyn Boulevard serves as a primary corridor within Brooklyn Center's "City Center"—the triangle formed by TH 100, Brooklyn Boulevard, and I-694. As a minor arterial, the Boulevard not only provides access from Highways 100 and I-694 to the Brookdale Mall site-a former regional shopping destination poised for redevelopment—and surrounding commercial areas, but also provides an alternative transportation connection between Minneapolis and its northern suburbs. Land uses adjoining Brooklyn Boulevard reflect the evolution of the community from the time Brookdale Center was constructed in 1962 until today: post-WWII housing that has remained in residential use, similar housing converted to commercial uses, smaller locally-owned commercial, national chain commercial, and offices. The quality and character of development along the corridor also varies significantly reflecting eras of prosperity and disinvestment. This incremental development of the past 50 years has resulted in a corridor that does not function at an optimal level;numerous driveways and access points create safety and operational concerns for motorists, a lack of good sidewalks and trails inhibit pedestrian and bicycle circulation, potentially incompatible adjacent land uses reduce quality of life for current occupants and dampen redevelopment opportunities, and transit facilities are not well integrated into the overall framework. Brooklyn Center's Comprehensive Plan identifies Brooklyn Boulevard as a critical element within the City Center, which merits focused efforts to renew, revitalize and redevelop. In keeping with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan,the City of Brooklyn Center is working toward a vision for the future of Brooklyn Boulevard with agency and community stakeholders. The purpose of this study is to create a visi on and future r ad way concepts for the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor that can become the foundation for identifying financial resources to fund preliminary engineering and construction, to be the basis to redevelop initiatives and review of redevelopment proposals. The Existing Conditions Study presents the Vision as articulated to date, as' well as an assessment of Existing Conditions in the corridor. The purpose of this report is to assemble and analyze data for the corridor to identify issues. Identification and mapping of corridor needs, deficiencies, constraints, and opportunities will assist in refining the.corridor vision and goals, as well as the future concepts for the corridor. BROOKLYN BOULEVARD STUDY 1 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. Vision The following statement is provided as the future vision guiding the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study. The vision addresses five topic areas: • Roadway functionality • Land Use,Community Character and Redevelopment • Transit • Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities • Implementation A vision statement is provided for each topic area, followed by specific goals to be accomplished as part of the Corridor Study. Vision for Roadway Functionality: In the future, the City and its project partners would like to see Brooklyn Boulevard effectively function as an A Minor Arterial on the regional system (CSAH 152), providing relief and support for Interstate 694 and Trunk Highway 100. Further, as an A Minor Arterial, the function of this roadway emphasizes mobility over parcel access, efficiently moving vehicular traffic through Brooklyn Center as well as providing regional access to 1-694 and Highway 100. The 1-694/Highway 100 interchange lacks accommodations for eastbound to southbound traffic and northbound to westbound traffic. Brooklyn Boulevard provides these connections. A plan for replacing direct parcel access from Brooklyn Boulevard with a system of frontage/backage roads or consolidating access through shared driveways where frontage/backage roads are not possible, should be developed and consistently implemented as opportunities arise from parcel acquisition or redevelopment. This access management plan will also address spacing of full-movement intersections with local streets, providing sufficient spacing between full-movement intersections to facilitate mobility where possible and meet the intentions of the Hennepin County access management plan. Intersections should be designed to accommodate forecast turning movements through 2030 [2040?] and sufficient right of way preserved to construct future roadway improvements, multi-modal needs, and provide sufficient set back°to adjacent land uses. Existing safety concerns should be addressed through geometric design, traffic controls and access management. BROOKLYN BOULEVARD STUDY 2 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. Corridor Study Goals: • Identify measures to improve roadway safety for all users where there are safety concerns. • Identify measures to improve traffic operations at critical intersections bofh under existing and 2030 forecast conditions. • Identify opportunities to eliminate or minimize access from Brooklyn Boulevard to private properties and minor side streets to enhance mobility and improve safety. Identify alternative access where needed. • Identify appropriate future typical cross sections for key segments of the corridor addressing all modal needs; assess available right of way and identify right of way preservation needs for these future cross sections. Vision for Land Use, Character,and Redevelopment In the future, land use types and scale of development should be appropriate to Brooklyn Boulevard's transportation function as an A Minor Arterial as well as its role as a community gateway. Appropriate setbacks from Brooklyn Boulevard should be provided. Single-family homes with access directly on Brooklyn Boulevard should be phased out and replaced with multi-family and/or commercial use as redevelopment occurs or property owners are willing to sell. Access to all land uses along the corridor should be provided via backage roads and/or the local network to facilitate mobility on Brooklyn Boulevard. Land uses fronting on Brooklyn Boulevard should also provide a transition to the single- family neighborhoods behind them through appropriate street design,building scale and buffering. The visual character of Brooklyn Boulevard should support quality land use by providing appropriate green and/or open space, streetscaping, lighting and landscaping. Stormwater treatment should be attractive as well as effective in improving water quality. The improved aesthetic character of Brooklyn Boulevard redevelopment will result in economic development for the City. Redevelopment opportunities should be appropriately sized to attract high quality development,provide appropriate site access, promote effective internal circulation and provide amenities which enhance the character of the corridor. Brooklyn Boulevard provides access from Highway 100 to the Shingle Creek Crossing redevelopment area. Brooklyn Boulevard should promote and enhance all modes of transportation in keeping with Complete Streets principles. Although there is no singular design prescription for Complete Streets; the Brooklyn Boulevard study will look at sidewalks, trails, boulevard widths, on-street bike lanes, shoulders, special bus accommodations, comfortable and accessible public transportation stops, frequent and safe crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, narrower travel lanes, and other treatments as appropriate. Corridor Study Goals: • Identify areas of land use not fully compatible with the transportation function of Brooklyn Boulevard. Recommend land use changes that would improve compatibility in terms of character, scale and access. BROOKt.r.%'hrwi.l:i,u+n.SruOr 3 SRFCwtsial m,Grump, Inc. • Identify measures to improve transitions from Brooklyn Boulevard land uses to adjacent single- family neighborhoods. • Develop a streetscape concept that relates to the character of other City Center public improvements. Identify appropriate opportunities for green space, open space and/or stormwater treatment. • Identify measures that will promote and enhance Complete Streets principles. Vision for Transit: Metro Transit strives to deliver environmentally sustainable transportation choices that link people,jobs, and community conveniently, consistently, and safely. The vision for transit along Brooklyn Boulevard will strive to meet this mission. Transit facilities along Brooklyn Boulevard should promote efficient flow of buses as well as attract and promote the comfort of transit users. Transit rider facilities (bus stops, shelters, park and ride lots etc.) should be provided in locations that promote personal safety and comfort for waiting riders; however, locational changes should be minimized to avoid rider confusion. Roadway enhancements (transit shoulders, etc.) should be designed to promote the efficient flow of transit vehicles and address roadway safety concerns. The future roadway should be able to be modified to incorporate longer term transit improvements(fixed route transit,etc.). Corridor Study Goals: • Identify opportunities to enhance transit rider safety and comfort in the corridor. • Identify measures to improve transit operations in the corridor. • Identify opportunities to support or enhance transit ridership in the corridor including transit supportive land use and good connections between transit facilities and rider origins and destinations. • Identify deficient pedestrian crossings to improve access to bus stops. Vision for Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities: Sidewalks and trails should provide continuous systems for walkers and bicyclists, connecting residential areas, transit facilities, recreational facilities, and shopping/employment areas. Sidewalks and trails should be offset a sufficient distance from Brooklyn Boulevard to provide a buffer from arterial traffic. All sidewalk and trail facilities should be ADA compliant, provide safe crossings of roadways and transit facilities, and be placed appropriately given the roadway function. Of particular concern is the proposed Twin Lakes Regional Trail which is planned to cross Brooklyn Boulevard near 55th Avenue. The network of on street and off street facilities should be compatible with surrounding roads such as facilities in Minneapolis(49th Avenue and Osseo Road). Corridor Study Goals: • Identify gaps in the current sidewalk and trail systems and recommend options for providing a continuous pedestrian and bicycle system. BROOKLYN BOULEVARD STUDY 4 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. • Identify measures to improve safety and comfort for walkers and bikers along Brooklyn Boulevard. • Identify appropriate pedestrian and bicycle facilities within future typical cross sections for Brooklyn Boulevard. • Identify appropriate pedestrian crossing enhancements that connect key destinations and other sidewalk and trail system routes across Brooklyn Boulevard. Vision for Implementation: The final Brooklyn Boulevard concept should be accompanied by an implementation plan that phases recommended improvements in appropriately-sized implementation pieces that can be funded and constructed in a reasonable manner. The Brooklyn Boulevard.Corridor Study should result in a long-term vision shared by the transportation stakeholders represented in the Corridor - the City of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Three Rivers Park District, Metro Transit and the Minnesota Department of Transportation—and cooperatively implemented over time. Corridor Study Goals: • Identify a comprehensive set of projects that will build toward the long-term vision identified in the corridor study. Projects should be appropriately sized for anticipated funding sources and appropriately defined to fall within participating agency authorities. • Identify potential funding sources,agency responsibilities and timelines for each project. • Identify appropriate sequencing and/or timelines for each project. • Identify measures to sustain long-term agency commitmext to the Corridor Study recommendations. • Identify funding source and operations/maintenance strategies for streetscape components. BRooKLYNBomEVARD STUDY $ SRF Consulting Group,Inc. • Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study Recommended Concept Report City of Brooklyn Center Prepared by: LI phki I Consulting Group,Inc. August 2012 Table of Contents ConceptOverview.........................................................................................................2 ConceptDescription........................................................................................................ 2 RoadwayConcept.........................................................................................................2 TrafficRecommendations ...............................................................................................2 ConceptDescription........................................................................................................ 5 LandUse Concept.........................................................................................................7 Proposed Land Use Transition Areas..............................................................................7 Trail and Sidewalk Concept..........................................................................................9 Proposed Trail and Sidewalk Enhancements..................................................................9 StreetscapingConcept...............................................................................................13 StreetscapeCharacter.................................................................................................. 13 TransitConcept...........................................................................................................17 • BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY I SRF Consulting Group,Inc. Concept Overview Concept Description P p The recommended concept addresses the issues identified in the Existing Conditions section of this report. The recommended concept described here is a long term vision, with some portions to be phased in using interim concepts. Roadway Concept t The roadway concept which follows includes recommended traffic, safety, and access improvements. Traffic Recommendations Year 2030 "Build" Traffic Analysis A year 2030 `Build" traffic analysis was completed using the same methodology as for the existing conditions. These improvements were identified to improve the operation and safety of the entire corridor for all modes of transportation. The improvements are identified in the recommendations section of this report.The HCS results of the analysis are shown Table 5. Table 1: Year 2030 "Build" Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results for Brooklyn Boulevard (CSAH 152) Level of Service INTERSECTION A.M.Peak P.M.Peak 65th Avenue North C C 63rd Avenue North B C Bass Lake Road(CSAH 10) C D 56th Avenue North* A/B A/B 55th Avenue North B C TH 100 North Ramp B B TH 100 South Ramp B C 51 st Avenue/Lilac* A/B A/C 50th Avenue North* ___ 49th Avenue North *Unsignalized intersection;Overall LOS/Worst Movement BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 2 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. These improvements have not been approved by any of the agencies having jurisdiction of the roadway. Additional analysis may be needed to gain these approvals, in particular at the TH 100 interchange. Recommendations Based on the crash analysis, safety review of the corridor, geometric review of the corridor, traffic analysis of the intersections under 20 year traffic projections, improvements for pedestrian and bicycle movements,we offer the following: Left and right-turn lanes for a 40 MPH roadway (turn-lanes maybe longer based on capacity needs or storage requirements): • Desired Standard: 315 feet (this includes full width turn-lane and taper) • Minimum Standard: 235 feet(this includes full width turn-lane and taper) The minimum standard length assumes an allowable 10 MPH deceleration in the through lane. Recommend that desired standard turn lanes be installed at a minimum. Consideration should be given to 10:1 or 5:1 tapers to provide more storage than taper length. I-94 South Ramp Intersection: • Modify the 1-94 off-ramp from a free channelized right-turn lane to a yield condition channelized right-turn lane, 65th Avenue North: • Add a northbound right-turn lane of desired standard length. • Revise the southbound right-turn lane from an auxiliary lane from the 1-94 ramp to a 300 to 500 foot right-turn lane(full width). 63rd Avenue North: • Provide right-turn lanes on the northbound and southbound approaches of desired standard length, although the southbound right-turn lane should start after the West Fire Station access. • Remove the split-phasing on the cross-street and replace with a permissive-only phase. Consider providing an eastbound leading left-turn phase (with 3rd car detection). With this being a signalized intersection, modify the eastbound approach to provide a left-turn lane, thru lane and a right-turn lane. Modify the westbound approach to provide a left- turn lane and thru-right lane. It would be desirable to provide an additional lane for the right-turn movement for westbound,but not imperative. BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 3 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. 62nd Avenue North, 61st Avenue North, 60th Avenue North/Admiral Lane and 59th Avenue North: • Provide right-turn lanes on the northbound and southbound approaches on a case-by-case basis and where space is available. Implementation could occur as right-of-way becomes available during redevelopment. • A future traffic signal may be warranted at 61st Avenue based on future redevelopment. Other factors to consider are pedestrian crossings of Brooklyn Boulevard and transit locations at this intersection. Bass Lake Road(CSAH 10): • Add a second southbound left-turn lane(300 feet in length). • Extend westbound left-turn lane from 125 feet to at least the standard length,which may require modification to the eastbound left-turn at the 3/4-access(Northway Drive). • Remove the northbound "auxiliary" lane from 56th Avenue North and replace with 300 to 500 foot right-turn lane. • Provide a right-turn lane into the Cub Foods/Wells Fargo access. Because of the intersection spacing between 56th Avenue North and this access, this right-turn lane will likely be shorter than the minimum standard length. • Extend eastbound turn lanes to provide 250 feet of storage (this will likely require purchase of home(s). Consider purchasing them as they become available on the south side of Bass Lake Road. • Remove all three channelized right-turn islands and provide a yield condition. 56th Avenue North: • Modify westbound right-turn lane to a yield condition with no add lane. • Extend southbound left-turn lane to 400 feet of full width with taper. • Consider a three-lane section on 56th Avenue North(may need-additional analysis). • Modify northbound right-turn channelized island to be a yield condition or modify the island (on the northside) to provide only one entering lane from the southbound left-turn movement(may need additional analysis). • Extend the northbound right turn lane to the desired standard length. 55th Avenue North: • Remove westbound and northbound channelized right-turn islands and provide a merge condition. • Extend northbound and southbound left-turn lanes to.provide desired standard length. BROOKLYNBOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 4 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. TH 100 North Ramp: • No`recommendations but need to consider auxiliary lane from the TH 100 South Ramp to 55th Avenue North. TH 100 South Ramp: • Modify off-ramp channelized right-turn lane to a merge condition and remove auxiliary lane to the north. • Modify the northbound channelized right-turn onto the freeway ion-ramp to tighter radius. • Add the fourth approach (eastbound) and provide access to North Lilac Drive. Remove this access from 51 st Avenue. • Signalize the intersection. • Add an additional right-turn lane to the off-ramp (dual right-turn lane). 51 st Avenue North: • Provide connection to the TH 100 south ramp via Lilac Drive. • Provide a southbound left-turn lane of desired standard length. 50th and 49th Avenue North: • Could consider three-lane section, but would need Minneapolis to continue a similar roadway section. Other Private Access: • Provide right-turn lanes to private access locations based on case-by-case basis. Higher volume driveways may need right-turn lanes to provide a safer intersection. Concept Description A geometric layout has been developed to incorporate and illustrate the various recommendations related to various issues reviewed as part of the study. Based on early coordination with Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County and MnDOT staff along with initial traffic operations review, it was determined the existing four-lane facility provides sufficient vehicular capacity and would not be expanded beyond four lanes. The existing posted speed of 40 mph north of TH 100 seems appropriate; however, the ultimate posted speed is typically determined based on a speed study. The 40 mph speed falls within the `low' speed regime of both MnDOT and Minnesota State Aid manuals for design of roadway facilities. The low speed regime allows for more flexibility with regards to lane widths and turn lane lengths on the roadway; and for more flexibility with clear zone requirements to fixed objects behind the curb. BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 5 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. The existing corridor includes four through lanes with turn lanes at,several intersections. Raised medians are present in limited areas; however none are currently in place between just north of 58th Avenue to just south of 63rd Avenue. The result in this area is an overall roadway width of 76 feet or more with no refuge for a pedestrian to cross. The existing sidewalks along Brooklyn Blvd are immediately adjacent to the curb or have minimal separation(3 feet to 5 feet) which leads to an uncomfortable feeling for pedestrians in this area. Between TH 100 and Bass Lake Road however, adequate boulevard widths exist and allow more separation between the vehicular traffic and pedestrians along the sidewalk. Between 49th Avenue and TH 100 is a slightly different character of roadway with a slightly lower posted speed limit of 35 mph and several single family residence accesses directly to Brooklyn Blvd. Traffic volumes in this area are markedly lower as well. This segment provides the connection to Minneapolis south of 49th Avenue. Perhaps most importantly, a reasonable balance between the required functions of an A minor arterial (mobility and access connecting I-694 to TH 100 as well as providing local access to ( tY ) g adjacent businesses and connected neighborhoods has been incorporated into the layout. The draft layout incorporates the review of multi-modal transportation needs, including vehicles, bicycles,pedestrians and transit as well as aesthetic components. On-street bike lanes were studied but are not recommended (see Trail and Sidewalk Concept) with the traffic volume and speed present in the corridor. An off-street shared use trail will provide a bicycle facility separated from traffic throughout the corridor. Input from bicyclist groups will be solicited for consideration related to this issue. Access points along the corridor have a significant effect on how the roadway operates and serves the public. As an A minor arterial, one purpose of this type of roadway is to provide mobility for vehicular traffic and connect other principal arterials such as TH 100 and I-694. Another purpose is to provide controlled access to parcels adjacent to the corridor. Existing P � P p J access points have been reviewed and compared with future land use plans. Direct access to Brooklyn Blvd is recommended to be consistent with Hennepin County's access spacing guidelines of full access every 1/4 mile and partial access every 1/8 mile. Various access points have been consolidated and/or eliminated for the future concepts. Future land use along Brooklyn Boulevard does not include single family residences, and therefore,those access points are recommended to be closed or consolidated. Other existing direct access points to businesses along the corridor may be limited to right in/right out only. The greatest impact to.access will be between 58th(Bass Lake Road) and 63rd,where no median exists today. Access revision will occur over time as land use changes, and consequently, the corridor will need to change over time as well. Several alternative geometric concepts for particular areas have been developed and are illustrated on the layout to demonstrate the implementation over time. The geometric layout developed for the project meets the intent of Hennepin County access guidelines and basically calls for a raised median throughout the corridor from TH 100 to I-694. Public roadway intersections,with minor exceptions, will have full access. Intersection geometry is based on traffic analysis at various intersections along the corridor. Turn lanes are set to accommodate future traffic projections as the area grows and redevelops. Dual left turn lanes at th 58 from Brooklyn Blvd are included to accommodate traffic moves to important destinations such as the Brooklyn Center Transit Center and the redevelopment of Brookdale Mall area. BwoKLYNBoumvARD CORRIDOR STUDY 6 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. The geometric layout incorporates 11-foot lanes to preserve the lower speed character of the roadway while also providing opportunity to increase amenities behind the curb such as widened boulevards, plantings, wider sidewalk/trail width, and transit amenities such as benches and/or shelters. Land Use Concept Proposed Land Use Transition Areas Over the years, Brooklyn Boulevard has evolved into an A Minor Arterial roadway with high traffic volumes. This, along with the need to improve safety along the corridor, created a situation where parcels with direct access to Brooklyn Boulevard are no longer desired. In addition, the existing roadway traffic volumes, higher travel speeds, and shallow house setbacks along Brooklyn Boulevard are typically not perceived by single-family households as a desirable environment. It is the City's long-term goal to redevelop single-family parcels along Brooklyn Boulevard to land uses better suited for this roadway, higher her traffic volumes g would be seen as a benefit,rather than a drawback,to the adjacent land use. As part of the future roadway reconstruction concept, direct access would be eliminated to Brooklyn Boulevard for several parcels along the corridor.These parcels would be considered as potential future land use transition areas and are located in the following five areas: • Intersection of 55th Avenue/Brooklyn Boulevard Service Road • South of Bass Lake Road • Admiral Lane to 61 st Avenue • 63rd Avenue to Halifax Drive • 61 st Avenue East of Brooklyn Boulevard The future land use transition areas were analyzed to determine preliminary parcel redevelopment parameters that might affect future redevelopment. For all of the land use transition areas, future land use change and access transition would be contingent upon willing sellers and private market demand. Since the existing parcels are configured for single-family use, these parcels would need to be assembled in order to create a parcel or parcels large enough to support an alternate land use that would be desirable along the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor. It is assumed that future redevelopment would comply with existing zoning setbacks and be buffered from the adjacent existing residential uses. Intersection of 55th Avenue/Brooklyn Boulevard Service Road As part of the roadway reconstruction concept, the service road west of 55th Avenue would be realigned west so the service road intersection is closer to Northport. Elementary School. BROOKLYNBOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 7 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. The conceptual service road realignment would significantly impact five parcels, such that these parcels would likely not be able to support future redevelopment. South of Bass Lake Road Service Road Access Option (see Figure 2) The proposed land use transition area south of Bass Lake Road is comprised of five parcels. These parcels would need to be assembled into one or two parcels to provide flexibility for future redevelopment. Access could occur from multiple points along the Brooklyn Boulevard Service Road or from 57th Avenue. The access drive on 57th Avenue would need to be setback 120 feet from the service road. The main internal circulation would most likely occur between 57th Avenue the service road cul-de-sac. Expanded Parcel Option To provide additional flexibility for redevelopment, an alternate option could potentially include abandoning the Brooklyn Boulevard service road north of 57th Avenue to the existing cul-de-sac and allowing this land to be absorbed into a new parcel assembly. The main access with this alternate option would be limited to 57th Avenue. However, internal circulation could potentially be more flexible and provide better opportunities for redevelopment. Admiral Lane to 61st Avenue(see Figure 3) The proposed land use transition area north of Admiral Lane is comprised of eight single-family residential parcels extending north to 61st Avenue. The shallow depth of the parcels would require the parcels to be assembled into one parcel to maximize redevelopment flexibility. Access drives could only occur off of Admiral Lane and 61st Avenue. The access drive off of Admiral Lane would require a minimum setback from Brooklyn Boulevard of 100 feet. The access drive off of 61st Avenue would require a minimum 120 foot setback from Brooklyn Boulevard. Main internal circulation would occur between the Admiral Lane and 61st Avenue access drives. North of 63rd Avenue(see Figure 4) The proposed land use transition area north of 63rd Avenue is comprised of five single-family residential parcels extending north to Halifax Drive. In order to provide maximum flexibility for redevelopment,these parcels would need to be assembled into one parcel. The access drive off of 63rd Avenue should be located west of existing Ewing Lane and be setback from Brooklyn Boulevard approximately 150 feet. The access drive off of Halifax Drive would require at least a 100 foot setback from Brooklyn Boulevard. Main internal circulation would occur between the 63rd Avenue and Halifax Drive access drives. 61st Avenue East of Brooklyn Boulevard(see Figure 5) The proposed land use transition area east of Brooklyn Boulevard and across from 61st Avenue is comprised of five commercial parcels and a portion of a multi-family residential parcel. The transition concept includes the extension of 61 st Avenue east of Brooklyn Boulevard and the BROOKLYNBomEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 8 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. creation of a new cul-de-sac. Three of the four existing commercial parcels could remain, with parcel access provided to the cul-de-sac. One commercial parcel would be significantly impacted by the new cul-de-sac. This parcel could potentially be redeveloped if could be combined with the remnant portion of the multi-family parcel directly south of it into a new parcel. Trail and Sidewalk Concept Proposed Trail and Sidewalk Enhancements Proposed Trail and Sidewalk Network While sidewalks already line both sides of Brooklyn Boulevard for a vast majority of the study area,the location of many of the sidewalks directly adjacent to the roadway, narrow sidewalk widths at several locations, and limited opportunities to safely cross Brooklyn Boulevard do not create an environment that is supportive of walking. The roadway also lacks bikeway facilities. Yet, there a number of destinations in close proximity to Brooklyn Boulevard that could be accessed via walking or biking if safe,comfortable, and convenient non-motorized facilities were available to potential users. Key Destinations Brooklyn Boulevard is situated next to several community destinations that city residents may wish to access by walking or bicycling. Two elementary schools (Garden City and Northport) and five neighborhood parks(Cahlander, Garden City, Wangstad,Northport, and Happy Hollow) are all located one block or less from Brooklyn Boulevard(see Figure 6,Trail/Sidewalk Network Concept). The commercial core of Brooklyn Center (Shingle Creek Crossing along with neighboring businesses and restaurants) abuts Brooklyn Boulevard. Finally, the Brooklyn Center Transit Station is located in close proximity to the corridor. Planned Bikeways in Adjacent Communities The City of Minneapolis is planning to construct several bikeways that would be easily accessed from a new bikeway along Brooklyn Boulevard. The City of Minneapolis Bicycle Master Plan shows planned off-street trails along Osseo Road and along 49th Avenue. At the time of this study, the City of Minneapolis has-not made a determination whether the planned trail would be located on the east or west side of Osseo Road. The City is also showing a planned signed bike route along Queen Avenue that will connect up with the Shingle Creek Regional Trail. These planned Minneapolis bikeways, Twin Lakes Regional Trail, and Shingle Creek Regional Trail, combined with a new bikeway along Brooklyn Boulevard will create a nice recreational loop trail.There are no other planned trails in other adjacent communities that would influence planned bikeways along Brooklyn Boulevard. BROOKLYNBoumvARD CORRIDOR STUDY 9 SRF Consulting Group,Inc., Bikeway Facility Alternatives and Evaluation On-street bike lane(or paved shoulder) The feasibility of providing on-street bicycle lanes or paved shoulders along Brooklyn Boulevard was evaluated as part of this study. The reconfiguration of travel lanes from four to three between 49th Avenue and the northbound TH 100 ramps would allow for the provision of an on- street facility without requiring additional right-of-way.This segment of Brooklyn Boulevard has lower existing and forecasted traffic volumes than Brooklyn Boulevard north of TH 100. The MnDOT Bikeway Facilities Design Manual recommends a 6-foot bike lane for Brooklyn Boulevard south of TH 100, based on a 30 mph vehicle speed and projected traffic volumes greater than 10,000 ADT on a two lane roadway. Figure 7, cross sections 1 and 2, depict Brooklyn Boulevard with the inclusion of a bike lane at two locations south of TH 100. Projected traffic volumes north of TH 100 are higher than projected traffic volumes south of TH 100.Planned travel lanes also increase to four lanes. The MnDOT Bikeway Facilities Design Manual recommends a 6-foot bike lane for Brooklyn Boulevard north of TH 100; based on a 30 mph vehicle speed and projected traffic volumes greater than 20,000 ADT on a four lane roadway. Given the proposed travel lanes for Brooklyn Boulevard included in this study, the provision of an on-street trail would require the City to acquire additional right-of-way. An analysis of the existing roadway network in this area indicates limited opportunities for on- street trail connections north to Brooklyn Park, due to the suburban street network and I-694. If an on-street bikeway was desired to make a connection to Brooklyn Park from northwest Brooklyn Center, it would likely need to occur on Brooklyn Boulevard. Cross section 4 (with bike lanes) on Figure 8 depicts Brooklyn Boulevard with the inclusion of a bike lane north of TH 100. Off-street multi-use trail An off-street multi-use trail could be located on either the east or west side of Brooklyn Boulevard. Locating the trail on the east side of Brooklyn Boulevard would provide convenient access to the City's commercial core, Garden City Park and Garden City Elementary School. Two small existing trail segments already exist along the west side of Brooklyn Boulevard. One segment extends north from the transit park and ride facility, under I-694 to 69th Avenue. A portion of the Twin Lakes Regional Trail extends along the west side of Brooklyn Boulevard between 52nd Avenue and 55th Avenue. A trail on the west side would provide convenient access to Northport Elementary School and four neighborhood parks. Proposed Bikeway Facilities Along Brooklyn Boulevard This study recommends that an off-street multi-use trail be located on the west side of Brooklyn Boulevard, extending the full length of the study area from 49th Avenue to I-694. The trail is recommended to be buffered from the roadway with a 10-foot boulevard to enhance user comfort and safety. Cross sections on Figures 7, 8 and 9 depict Brooklyn Boulevard with an off-street _ multi-use trail along the west side of the road. Placing the multi-use trail on the west side provides convenient access to four neighborhood parks and one elementary school. It also takes advantage of two existing trails along the west side of the roadway. A connection to the Twin Lakes Regional Trail will provide a continuous trail connection to another neighborhood BwoKLYNBOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 10 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. park, Twin Lakes Park and ultimately a connection to the City of Robbinsdale. A trail on west side also extends the existing trail north of I-694 further south to the Twin Lakes Regional Trail without making bicyclists cross Brooklyn Boulevard. When the Brooklyn Boulevard segment south of TH100 is reconstructed, the City of Brooklyn Center should coordinate with the City of Minneapolis to gain a current understanding of Minneapolis' plans associated with constructing multi-use trails along Osseo Road and 49th Avenue. While Brooklyn Boulevard is the most logical on-street connection to Brooklyn Park from northwest Brooklyn Center,the existing and projected traffic volumes along Brooklyn Boulevard between TH 100 and I-694 do not provide a comfortable bicycling environment. Community input received indicated support for an off-street trail, but did not indicate a desire for an on- street facility. Therefore, an on-street bike lane or paved shoulders are not included in the concept plan for the corridor. While traffic volumes would be more conducive to an on-street facility south of TH 100,the lack of existing and planned on-street connections in this area does not support the need for a designated on-street bike lane for this segment of Brooklyn Boulevard. Connecting to Brooklyn Boulevard The City of Brooklyn Center is starting to establish a network of bikeways throughout the community. Currently, 63rd Avenue is lined on both sides with sidewalks. 63rd Avenue provides a key east-west connection through the community. West of Brooklyn Boulevard, 63rd Avenue will provide a direct connection to a planned transit station along Bottineau Boulevard in Brooklyn Center. East of Brooklyn Boulevard, 63rd Avenue provides a direct connection to Centennial Park, City Hall and the Hennepin County Government Center complex.The City may want to consider converting one of the sidewalks along 63rd Avenue to a multi-use trail to better facilitate east-west bicycling across the city. Proposed Sidewalks Along Brooklyn Boulevard This study recommends that a sidewalk be located on the east side of Brooklyn Boulevard, extending the full length of the study area from 49th Avenue to I-694. The sidewalk is recommended to be buffered from the roadway with a 10-foot boulevard to enhance user comfort and safety. Locating the sidewalk along the east side of the road will provide convenient access to Garden City Park and Garden City Elementary School. It will also provide convenient access to the City's commercial core. Cross sections on Figures 7, 8 and 9 depict Brooklyn Boulevard with a sidewalk along the east side of the road. Connecting to Brooklyn Boulevard The City of Brooklyn Center has established a strong network of sidewalks throughout the community. This study includes a proposed realigned intersection at Admiral Lane/60th Avenue. The City may want to consider the construction of a sidewalk along Admiral Lane,60th Avenue, and a short segment of Vincent Avenue to make a convenient connection to Centennial Park (see Figure 6,Trail/Sidewalk Network Concept).The City may also want to consider including a sidewalk along the extension of 61st Avenue east of Brooklyn Boulevard and then a short off- street extension of the sidewalk east to Beard Avenue. BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 11 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. Proposed Intersection Safety Enhancements Median refuge islands In order to enhance pedestrian safety, the concept includes extending roadway median islands to intersection crosswalks. While traffic signals are typically timed to provide pedestrians adequate time to fully cross the roadway in one signal phase, at times pedestrians misjudge the time needed to cross. The extended median islands provide a safe refuge for pedestrians to wait until the next pedestrian crossing signal phase. Countdown timers Another intersection crossing approach that enhances pedestrian safety is the use of countdown timers at traffic signals. The countdown timers provide pedestrians with the remaining time on the pedestrian signal phase. This allows pedestrians to make better decisions whether there is enough time left to safely cross the intersection. Proposed future traffic signal at 61st Avenue/Brooklyn Boulevard intersection Pedestrians and bicyclists should cross Brooklyn Boulevard at signalized intersections. Currently, there is one stretch of Brooklyn Boulevard extending between Bass Lake Road and 63rd Avenue where there is not a traffic signal. Pedestrians prefer not to make a detour to cross at a signalized intersection.The lack of a signal in this roadway segment discourages pedestrian movement and likely encourages pedestrians to venture an unsafe crossing either mid-block or at an unsignalized intersection. Most of the east-west sidewalks in the City's sidewalk network intersect Brooklyn Boulevard at a signalized crossing.This is not the case at 61 st Avenue, where the sidewalk west of Brooklyn Boulevard leads pedestrians to an unsignalized intersection. 61st Avenue is located.between Bass Lake Road and 63rd Avenue and could fill the gap in the signal spacing. The City may want to investigate the feasibility of installing a signalized intersection at 61st Avenue to enhance pedestrian access and safety. 55th Avenue Regional Trail Crossing Analysis The Twin Lakes Regional Trail currently crosses Brooklyn Boulevard at grade on the south side of 55th Avenue at a signalized intersection. The crossing is at a point where the trail transitions from a lower traffic residential neighborhood on the west side of Brooklyn Boulevard to a busier commercial environment to the east. The existing trail route runs north-south along Brooklyn Boulevard, east-west along 55th Avenue, and north-south again along Xerxes Avenue.This route requires trail users to be observant and probably slow down to follow the route. Maintaining the at-grade crossing is an option in the future roadway redesign.Additionally, three alternatives for a grade-separated crossing were evaluated(see Figure 10). • Alternative A-pedestrian bridge at 55th Avenue • Alternative B -pedestrian bridge midway between 55th Avenue and THIN • Alternative C -underpass near TH 100 bridge Alternative Crossing Route A In Option A, the trail route would follow the east side of Brooklyn Boulevard as it does today to a pedestrian bridge crossing at the 55th Avenue intersection. In order to provide the required BRooKLYNBouLEmw CORRIDOR STUDY 12 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. vertical clearance for Brooklyn Boulevard beneath the bridge, the trail would climb a structured switchback in the median between Osseo Road and Brooklyn Boulevard on the west side. On the east side, the surrounding area is currently occupied by commercial properties. Acquisition of right-of-way in the southeast quadrant of the intersection would permit construction of a helix ramp to return the trail to grade. Alternative Crossing;Route B Instead of following Brooklyn Boulevard north all the wa to 55th Avenue as in Option A, the trail in Option B would begin to climb vertically near 53r Avenue permitting construction of a pedestrian bridge approximately midway between 55th Avenue and TH100. Two straight ramps would be necessary to ascend and descend on either side of Brooklyn Boulevard. The right-of- way on the east side would be narrow to accommodate both the ramp and a boulevard and sidewalk that is planned to parallel Brooklyn Boulevard for its entire length. Alternative Crossing;Route C In Option C,the trail route would cross the southbound entrance ramp to TH 100,make a loop as it descends grade and pass through a new culvert constructed through the embankment under Brooklyn Boulevard. This route would put trail users in close proximity to the high-speed freeway. The trail would than ascend again to cross the TH 100 exit ramp at grade heading north along Xerxes Avenue. Crossing Recommendation While the grade-separated crossing options considered would provide some additional degree of safety, an at-grade crossing at the signalized 55th Avenue intersection, as currently exists,would . provide adequate pedestrian and bicyclist accommodations for less cost and with fewer right-of- way and property impacts. The tight spatial constraints would restrict the geometries of the grade-separated crossings to low design speeds and thereby not afford a significant increase in the efficiency of the crossing. Lastly, any crossing at a location other than 55th Avenue, as in Routes B and C, would be counter to typical circulation patterns of crossing at an intersection and require trail users to backtrack a short distance before continuing on. For these reasons, the at-grade crossing option is recommended. Streetscaping Concept Streetscape Character Precedent Streetscape Treatments Streetscape elements proposed for Brooklyn Boulevard build upon recently constructed streetscapes on Bass Lake Road and Xerxes Avenue.Brooklyn Boulevard continues to reinforce the identity of this district as the community's commercial core. Streetscape elements such as street lights, maintenance strips, fencing and bus stops continue the vocabulary already established for the district. BROOKLYNBOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 13 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. Proposed new gateway monuments reference the character and forms of the City's existing gateway monument located at 49th Avenue, while also providing updated materials and expression of the original monument(see Figure 11, Gateway Concept Sketch). Community Gateways The experience of entering the City of Brooklyn Center occurs when drivers exit either 1-694 or TH 100 and turn onto Brooklyn Boulevard. Gateway monuments are proposed at these two key locations to announce visitors' and residents' arrival and entrance into the community (see Figure 12, Streetscape Opportunities). Community gateways start to establish the design vocabulary and unique character of the corridor. The TH 100 bridge is planned to be re-decked in the near future. The design of the new bridge deck, including associated bridgeheads,fencing and lighting could also function as a community gateway by using design elements common to the entire Brooklyn Boulevard corridor.A third monument is proposed for the southeast quadrant of the Bass Lake Road and Brooklyn Boulevard intersection as this marks the primary entrance to the commercial core from Brooklyn Boulevard. Character Segments In response to future land use character and future street character, the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor was defined as a series of three character segments that served as a guide through the corridor study to produce the preliminary streetscape concepts. The segments are labeled A through C starting from 49th Avenue and proceeding north to I-694 (see Figure 12). Segment A Segment A extends from 49th Avenue to TH 100. Future land use along this portion of the corridor will continue to be single-family and multi-family residential with a few light industrial and commercial parcels closer to TH 100. The area between 49th Avenue and 51s' Avenue is defined by a residential neighborhood. Driveway access points would remain and the roadway section would use a three lane configuration reinforcing the neighborhood street character of this portion of Segment A. The typical section between 49th Avenue and 51' Avenue also includes a 10-foot trail with a 10-foot turf boulevard on the west side and a 6-foot walk with a 10-foot turf boulevard on the east side.This proposed streetscape section would impact the existing right-of-way(see Figure 7, Cross Section 1). Between 51st and TH 100, land use transitions to light industrial and commercial with some multi-family housing. The roadway responds to the change widening to a four-lane road divided with a median. The typical section in this portion of Segment A also includes a 10-foot trail and 10-foot turf boulevard on the west side and a 6-foot walk and a 10-foot turf boulevard on the east side.This proposed streetscape section would stay within the existing right-of-way (see Figure 7, Cross Section 2). Streetscape design elements for Segment A would be minimal (see Figure 13, Streetscape Design Elements).The boulevard treatment would include: • Turf grass with street trees • • Maintenance strip BROOKLYNBOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 14 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. • Sidewalk or trail • Sidewalk access to bus stops Median treatment options would include: • Ornamental lighting without banners at intersections • Colored pavement in the narrow medians • Turf grass with street trees and a maintenance strip in wide medians Segment B Segment B extends from TH 100 to 59th Avenue: Future land use along this portion of the corridor will continue to be commercial along the east side Brooklyn Boulevard and a mixture of commercial, single-family and multi-family residential on the west side of Brooklyn Boulevard. This segment starts with a TH 100 overpass bridge. The TH 100 bridge is planned to be re- decked in the near future, which allows for the reallocation of space on the bridge deck between vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle users (see Figures 14, TH 1�� Overpass Bridge Re-decking). North of the TH 100 bridge, the typical section to 59th Avenue has two vehicle travel lanes in each direction separated by a median island of varying width.The typical section also includes a 10-foot trail with a 10-foot turf boulevard in a widened median island on the west side and a 6-foot walk with a 10-foot turf boulevard on the east side. This proposed streetscape section would not impact the existing right-of-way (See Figure 9, Cross Sections 3a and 3b).The wide median island on the west side of Brooklyn Boulevard provides additional opportunities to include additional street trees along the corridor, some topographic variation, meandering of the • multi-use trail and potential' stormwater treatment rain gardens. A representative layout of portion of Segment B near Bass Lake Road is depicted in Figure 11, Brooklyn.Boulevard/ Bass Lake Road Intersection Streetscape Concept. P p Streetscape design for Segment B would emphasize the commercial importance of this segment and include the highest concentration of Streetscape elements(see Figure 13, Streetscape Design Elements).The boulevard treatment would include: • Turf grass with street trees • Maintenance strip • Sidewalk or trail • Sidewalk access to bus stops • Ornamental lighting with banners Median treatment options would include: • Ornamental lighting with banners • Colored pavement and bollards in the narrow medians • Turf grass with street trees and a maintenance strip in wide medians • Landscape planting beds at the end of turf grass areas i BROOKLYNBOULEwD CORRIDOR STUDY 15 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. . Segment Segment C extends from 59th Avenue to I-694. Future land use along this portion of the corridor will continue to be predominantly commercial and office uses, interspersed with single-family and multi-family residential uses until these parcels transition to a new use. The typical section between 59th Avenue and I-694 has two vehicle travel lanes in each direction separated by a median island of varying width. The typical section also includes a 10-foot trail with a 10-foot turf boulevard on the west side and a 6-foot walk with a 10-foot turf boulevard on the east side. This proposed streetscape section would impact the existing right-of-way (see Figure 8,Cross Sections 4, Without Bike Lane). Streetscape design for Segment C would respond to the commercial nature of the corridor, but streetscape elements will not be as concentrated as Segment B. (see Figure 13 Streetscape Design Elements).The boulevard treatment would include: • Turf grass with street trees • Maintenance strip • Sidewalk or trail • Sidewalk access to bus stops • Ornamental lighting without banners Median treatment options would include: • • Ornamental lighting without banners • Colored pavement and bollards in the narrow medians • Turf grass with street trees and a maintenance strip in wide medians • Landscape planting beds at the end of turf grass areas Intersection Enhancements Intersections along Brooklyn Boulevard receive one of three different streetscape treatment types (primary, secondary and no treatment), based on their role in providing community gateways, wayfinding, and streetscape character(see Figure 2, Streetscape Opportunities). Primary intersections are located at community gateways to announce arrival and entrance to the City or arrival to the City's commercial core. Primary intersections receive the highest level of streetscape treatment and may include large gateway monuments, heightened landscape plantings, seating and trash receptacles, and fencing/screening of adjacent parking lots. An illustration of a representative primary intersection is found on Figure 11, Brooklyn Boulevard/Bass Lake Road Intersection Streetscape Concept. Secondary intersections are located at signalized intersections that are not primary intersections. These intersections include enhancements that create a pleasant environment for pedestrians as they wait to cross Brooklyn Boulevard. They also announce key cross streets for turning vehicles. Secondary intersections receive some streetscape treatment, but not to the same extent as primary intersections and may include small monuments and landscape plantings. BwoKLYNBOU miw CORRIDOR STUDY 16 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. Both primary and secondary intersections will have marked crosswalks at signalized . intersections with colored pavement at the intersections (see Figure 13, Streetscape Design Elements). Transit Concept Transit is an important component of the transportation infrastructure within the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor study area. A total of 10 bus routes operate on portions of Brooklyn Boulevard. Currently, there are no plans for increased transit service along Brooklyn Boulevard; however, the following sections describe recommended improvements to bus stops to encourage increased transit use. Bus Stop Spacing Currently, there are 45 bus stops within 1/4-mile of the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor. There are 18 bus stops directly on Brooklyn Boulevard. Metro Transit's current bus stop spacing policy is to provide one of the following options: 0 Eight stops per mile • One stop every long city block • One stop every two short city blocks Bus stop spacing in the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor is approximately eight stops per in This type of spacing provides the greatest amount of access to transit customers by minimizing the distance users need to travel to a bus stop. No additional bus stops are needed along Brooklyn Boulevard. As development occurs, consideration should be given to the placement of buildings closer to Brooklyn Boulevard and to the placement of parking farther from the roadway. Building in this manner provides better access for transit customers to adjacent land uses. Currently, no bus stops are located on Brooklyn Boulevard between Bass Lake Road and 55th Avenue because there is no bus service along this section of Brooklyn Boulevard. Bus service is provided along Xerxes Avenue between Bass Lake Road and 55th Avenue. Bus Stop Placement Bus stops can be located on the near-side of an intersection, the far-side after the bus has passed through an intersection, or at a mid-block location. Bus stop location is based on a number of factors. Some of these factors include adjacent land uses, impact on intersection operations, intersecting bus routes, physical roadside constraints (utilities, driveways, etc.), and traffic control devices. Along Brooklyn Boulevard, the majority of the bus stops are located at the near-side of an intersection; however, there are a few bus stops along the corridor that are at far-side and mid- block locations. Most of the existing bus stop locations along the corridor have been placed in BwoKLYNBOULBVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 17 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. appropriate locations; however, a few locations have been identified that suggest further analysis is needed to recommend a new bus stop location.These locations are: • Brooklyn Boulevard and Admiral Lane (southbound) - the existing bus stop is located at the near-side of the intersection, directly outside a residential property. Consider moving this bus stop to the far-side of the intersection so that it is located across from Cross of Glory Lutheran Church. • Brooklyn Boulevard and 51 st Avenue (southbound) - the existing bus stop is located at the far-side of the intersection, directly outside a residential property. Buses regularly stop to load/unload passengers, causing conflicts with mainline motorists. Further highlighting the problem is that as vehicles are waiting to turn left onto 51 st Avenue or Lilac Drive, there is the potential for a bus to be loading/unloading in the adjacent lane. This creates a complete stoppage of all motorists. The existing bus stop should be moved to another location to alleviate this issue. • Brooklyn Boulevard and TH 100 (northbound) - the existing bus stop is located at the middle of the block.Mid-block bus stops are not recommended unless they provide direct access to a destination, or there is no other location to place the bus stop. Mid-block bus stops encourage customers to jaywalk (cross mid-block, rather than at an intersection) which results in unsafe conditions. Consideration should be given to move this current bus stop location so that it is at an intersection with a cross-walk. Bus Pull-Outs A bus pull-out, or bus bay, is a specifically constructed area separated from the general travel lanes to provide for boarding and alighting of passengers. This design allows through traffic to flow freely without the obstruction of a stopped bus. Some of the advantages and disadvantages of pull outs are described in the following table. Table 2. Bus Pull-Out Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages Disadvantages • Allows transit customers to board and • Presents problems to bus drivers when alight out of the general travel lane attempting to merge into traffic,especially • Provides a protected area away from during periods of high roadway volumes moving vehicles for both the stopped bus • Is expensive to install compared to and transit customers curbside bus stops • Minimizes delay to through traffic • Is difficult and expensive to relocate Currently,there are three bus pull-outs on Brooklyn Boulevard.They are located at: • 61 st/62nd Avenue(northbound)-mid-block • 61st Avenue(southbound)-far-side of the intersection • 59th Avenue(northbound)-.far-side of the intersection BROOKLYNBonEwD CORRIDOR STUDY 18 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. In the future transit concept, it is recommended that the bus pull-outs on Brooklyn Boulevard be removed.This is recommended because removing the bus pull-outs and allowing buses to remain in the travel lane eliminates the need for buses to merge in and out of traffic. This provides for a faster travel time for transit customers. Also, as a part of the future roadway concept, a 10-foot boulevard is proposed between the edge of the roadway and the sidewalk. This boulevard along with the sidewalk width provide for an adequate pedestrian/transit patron distance from vehicles. Passenger Amenities at Bus Stops Passenger amenities at bus stop locations play a role in a person's decision to use transit. Passenger amenities are installed at select bus stop locations to improve passenger comfort and the attractiveness of transit as an alternative mode of transportation. A number of factors are considered when determining what type of passenger amenities should be included at a bus stop. These factors include: • Average daily boardings • Proximity to trip generators • Passenger transfer activity • Planned neighborhood improvements • Community requests Some of the main passenger amenities that are considered at bus stop locations include: • Passenger shelters • Benches • Trash receptacles • Lighting • Bicycle racks and/or Bicycle lockers • Intelligent transportation systems(ITS)features: — Real time signage — Emergency buttons or call boxes • Landscaping features Depending on the number of transit u stop and the amount of available ansit customers using a bus o a p g g P space, a bus stop may be as simple as a signpost along a sidewalk, or more complex with a large paved area with a bus shelter and other amenities. Metro Transit's standard for providing bus shelters is a minimum daily boarding of 25 customers for areas outside of Minneapolis and Saint Paul. Currently, the only bus stop with a Metro Transit shelter is at Brooklyn Boulevard and TH 100. Another location that currently meets Metro Transit's shelter threshold but does not have a shelter installed is at Brooklyn Boulevard and 51 st Avenue. BwoKLYNBo EVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 19 SPY Consulting Group,Inc. As a part of the future transit concept development, passenger amenities are recommended at all bus stop locations.Three levels of amenities were developed: 1. Low boarding locations(less than 10 average weekday boardings) 2. Medium boarding locations(between 10 and 25 average weekday boardings) 3. High boarding locations(greater than 25 average weekday boardings) Figure 15 shows the average weekday boardings at each bus stop location on Brooklyn Boulevard. The types of amenities included in the various levels are described in more detail in the following section. Low Boarding Locations At low boarding bus stop locations, a bench, trash receptacle, and landscaping elements are proposed as shown in Figure 16 and Figure 17. Medium Boarding Locations At medium boarding bus stop locations,two benches trash receptacle, and landscaping elements are proposed as shown in Figure 18 and Figure 19. High Boarding Locations At high boarding bus stop locations, a passenger shelter, a bench, trash receptacle, a bicycle locker and bicycle racks, and landscaping elements are proposed as shown in Figure 20. Lighting Lighting affects transit customers' perception of safety and security at a bus stop, as well as the use of the site by non-transit customers. Lighting can enhance a person's sense of comfort and security, especially in the evening and late-evening. Bus stops should be coordinated with existing street lights to provide a minimum level of lighting and security; however, if feasible, lighting should be incorporated at medium and high boarding locations. Regional Transitway Connections No transitways are being developed in the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor study area; however, a potential connection to the regional transitway network via the Chicago Avenue Arterial Bus. Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridor is being studied by Metro Transit as a follow-up to the Arterial Transitway Corridors Study (ATCS). The Chicago Avenue Corridor would potentially affect Brooklyn Boulevard between 49th Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. If arterial BRT stations are identified along this segment of Brooklyn Boulevard, the elements listed in the physical concept plans would be incorporated. The ATCS is described in more detail in the following section. Arterial Transitway Corridors Study Metro Transit completed the ATCS, a year-long study of improvements along some of the Twin Cities' most heavily traveled transit corridors. The purpose of the ATCS was to develop a facility and service plan to enhance efficiency, speed,reliability, customer experience,and transit market competitiveness on 11 high-demand urban corridors. Faster service is accomplished by reducing customer boarding and traffic signal delays and stopping at fewer locations. An improved customer experience is achieved by adding stations, BROOKLYNBOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY 20 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. using information technology, and improving service reliability and vehicle comfort. Physical concept plans were developed during the ATCS to define how the various characteristics of arterial BRT would be applied. The physical concept plans include the following: • Mixed-traffic runningways • Transit signal priority I • Roughly half-mile station spacing • Stations located at far-side of intersections where possible • Curb extensions on road segments with on-street parking; curbside stations where no parking is present today • Nine-inch raised curbs for"near-level"boarding • Premium vehicles with all-door boarding • Stations sized to match demand and fit site conditions • Modular station shelter design with a distinctive Rapid Bus brand • Off-board fare collection using ticket vending machines • Foundational transitway components at stations One of the 11 corridors that was studied in the ATCS was the Chicago Avenue Corridor. The primary route that operates in the Chicago Avenue Corridor is the Route 5.Route 5 begins at the Brooklyn Center Transit Center(BCTC).There are two primary weekday route patterns-one that runs between BCTC and 38th Street and one that runs between north Minneapolis and the Mall of America. e a. I The ATCS identified that further study of this corridor is needed to examine the potential to extend the Chicago Avenue arterial BRT to duplicate the Route 5;traveling on Emerson-Fremont through north Minneapolis and up to BCTC. Once Metro Transit has completed its analysis, coordination with the City and County would be necessary to incorporate the elements of the transitway at proposed stations and along Brooklyn Boulevard. BwonyNBOULmRD CORRIDOR STUDY 21 SRF Consulting Group,Inc. y. _ _ s i f� 'f}, �1� � 3 ,�� Irv • 2k, �� �' � __----._ _, :� r ,�! ii. �r..�• . . C 4 •y�'' rf' _ - � _:� r���L � 9�`�`.ry����-. ,,, �' '�m `f r Ate, � ;r( or e , 4 1 P44#5 2I r 1 LEGEND Ylflf?"I r \A A AAA/Scrrrn r+islinq bou+ln[I lrum lulurr � ,r � S ♦ __ -_ � V 1/V1rr1l APVPInpm.nt II ♦ _ ii rn • v Potential future ArvNOOmeM,xcess C If a chcuLitlnnuturc dcvcloprrknt m • x +�E . • �� J _ Cl d access pa wo nl ficon B4lyn (j i9 BoulevarA � ♦ _ �; ► L•�n,�us=•+nll nrrru trnnvttnn conuuU«nl upon w i�• •` Y•f♦ + 1 r r II�IIII)•,rIICr dnd Fin vnlr mwket demnrtd. 2 ^ Land Use and Access Transition Area (South of Bass Lake Road) Figure 2 Consulting Group,Inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center • 0 • • 0 • ....... .... T _ � w _ - VV~ R1►A/Ace1rr^teTplrnq huuslnq linen future PolCntraI(11111rC rICVN00ownf aCCMS Potential future dcvNopnknt U [h[ulatlon L m CkxJ access po.m frpm Brooklyn (� Boulevard r use nn Actr.sS 11.rnSilinn Ca^1 nWUltlt UpOIY`' tlling se�let antl{xivnte market demand. �� Land Use and Access Transition Area (Admiral Lane to 61st Avenue) Figure 3 Consulting Group,Inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study- Recommended Concept Report 7589 1 120731 City of Brooklyn Center Ow jag I LEGEND \A/� AAA/Scrrm canting humingh—ful- �._1�'—f_��i—%►.� I T V V 1�1[�• AevBlnpmanl `� l� r �� ♦ Potential future development access Polrnllal luture dcvclapmcnl L ' [inulatlan m x Ctoxd access Pont h[nn Brooklyn C7 ;lK tlaulxard J a - .ant utr nntl m r[yS Iramthpn rnntm9enl upon IlInU seller and privAle market demand. p Land Use and Access Transition Area (63rd Avenue to Halifax Drive) Figure 4 Consulting Group,Inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center i • • �' rte- --� `� +�,°l+► tl".'�; �s a n�►t t+1. � �'� T t , ;iA! W. * F `1 r .,/• . � LEGEND N .o PotcntW future devNopment access 1 ..... Potential future deWopment L co Cbsed xcesf pp"nt from Brooklyn boulevard On I n uw and ettes.%IranuGnn runt nyent upon'r illfny seller nnrl private market�Jtlm.rnd. a � Land Use and Access Transition Area (61st Avenue East of Brooklyn Boulevard) Figure 5 Consulting Group,Inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center f.. :;r 'ti 1 � � a. ' •I f.� ,.�i�' a .. ^..•.vI +II R,. t�. OfcAict'i�n�'iyt'tt� ' y, ', 1.1.1--r ,i v —•--* _- r to. •ttl 1 Lr .I• �1` 1•rI�^ v� Y b. . r1t. 'k •�_'�/►> r— "'•S - 1.r "t 'r �f P0. • _�![ r Yyj—ii it r P X1"'1 '�..-•�....J`—• t�+In L\k - P16 j 1 r�... . 1 rt t 1 •r .1 �' tL Ndrth P,iI4' 1p,;,'"e�4 ► ww lakr 1 v. f Y+ w - �E L l F 1I, E .1 y •''Ia� Rht vk - r '1. ♦ ` Twin Ldk! i, •'r :• F �fv! ?+ t'.Y L ..I' ' jy:{Sa l - 1 i t t !_,:.,,4 `_s rt-) - � ^.^i: `,7 ~• t et�nn1srulal• t�1"i�y�` �� r l n�\ 4�� r " ii � -' �l ` 1 L 1 r ' _ Jr'r. .,�,�r 1``t'-�.� � • f try�� � �` 1.� w F l �, .� =t ��}�` •j`{.'� ;tr �-�.,;s�. ,k �Il." � :'Y ,1�[ _ � F�rA /�2.1. 4'.rir 1•.,�f 4' + ! , ' >L.� a `iitt��4rr •.� ` �L�r}�w 1 `" _ t � �� � ..� , ;` ��' � i i �'�' i i.. S'f,f 1. —� t'��' �\�r1'4'Y` _ J�� � � � .� r.•lT s%t I ' f ._,1 f: ! \ }' °♦ (" 1.r' t k i f ate. T � a, t,•. '� `` ��i• '' \ '�' 1. 1!r 'f"�.ti�ty .J, r,.1r�k _-1 _._ w. - �• r y .L.� _ �u�Qil+'4alu i `, +�", r' tJ t� ' r Y r "; ,3 i 1`y l ".. � yr a11,r�'.f .1 � ` �j t 51 �` � < s. .tYY1r19\Idd 1 •\a ,�.��tj +� ' /"�,' :• Na�hpon Par{ - \. r+ � '' �r;1;<L�Park' N` !q' 't ,�� i.L r t t.� _ ' hrrol' - :�� L L�� �,��.4 �� 4��1•.i",-I. _ 1 r'�- .���', � •r',�` r1�,�i1�,� 10D f — �� _ _ I�21f^'\ !. P '�4�L��•^—i"./1LL f /�,1,�It a-c�1-7.k-.• M - "�� �t�'� �;�.1 n'�?j,T`•� '����t... i �"i�[��.t. � ,�-I ;.. r•_�TY1'�•�..t Ni'Ir•.11lau DY ' � y"J� 1 �-`.��(,r � l ',..f 7^ti r 4 �•�'�n].'�r x.� ..f1.11f111f7 - { I rt �ia't=.y' <.. 1". �'�,.-<� .l/! .r..� 1 1 f{rk y a r�T `:i r •. :+f i ��. ,� .�.s ia'i \ 7 1 Hti i�/' 'tti�� 4. '�.t ,. ;i .��J�//jj11j i •%: ,'�1 � .. `� �• � -+ �` s !i'Ltf '� �� a p L1y r l. +au. 1� } `�, u• L �i x �.. ..- •s—=-� � —r-: b�i�=I'yea I((.s j'� fr y�''i "T.w, r-•'�'t'r'1' - 1 r.- ���r.i ; • r� ..�,�',Y �L't•� r'Z' t�',�a t LECEND / 1 n _ `•`� IN ijae`si{- 1L:,'. a7..�\ C'r•n k"... 1• ,. r t,. �. :� (�� , bwmq —�T" rKr 1 ' s ',�1pz' rnrr•nn!n19•\i1 *�`�._.`rj�l�. :. t ..T �.r:r.(hr. 11 1.i..T�?.� _i'•�{ 1`�.i tt 4 i :'4; I a - ..,1,/ 1 • 1 i •• i1 . 1 / •• 1 �' / I'I 1 'I '11 1 1 : 11 Typical Streetscape Cross Sectlon 1 ' DECORATIVE ROADWAY LIGHTING AT INTERSECTIONS Residential Area Segment A Between 491h Ave.and _ bou t STst Ave.-LookingNorth 4 tV i4. z 11r lo' z' c !r _ !z' _ L1' V to, RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD 1111 TU BIKE T14RU [pNTINUDUStER 1NRU BIKE TURF WALK RESIDENTIAL RF RIVD IANE TURN LANE LANE BLVD BD' PROPOSED RIGIrt OF WAY POTENTIAL EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY POTENTIAL O 5 in RIGHT OF RIGHT OF WAY IMPACT WAY IMPACT v Typical Streetscape Cross Section 2 CORATIVE ROADWAY LIGNTING Interchange Area RD CANOPY TREES c Segment A Between S 1st Ave.and MEDIAN CANOPY TREES r } N TW 100-Looking North d <`s w C •* N + TUFT p CONCRETE MAINTENANCE STRIP- ar ro � i o _ uI •A& g c Q. m (Q7 J VARIES 10' ld 2 6' 11 12' 17 ]Y ll' 6' 10' b' ao FRONTAGE TURF DIV TRAII TURF BIKE THRU 7HRI1 MEDIAN 7HRU THRU BIKE TURF WALK � ROAD BLVD LANE LANE BLVD � VARIES 11)'with bike lanes(105'wilhoot blLe lanes) VARIES d 2 205'd- d EXISTING RIGI IT or WAY 2 Streetscape Cross Sections Figure 7 Consulting Group,Inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center Typical Streetscape Cross Section 4 nFrORnnVF RnAnWAY I AGHTING (With Bike Lanes) BOULEVARD CANOPY TREES Segment C Between 59th Ave.and L i -65th Ave.-Looking Norrh i • t­-A 1� EX.LMDSCAPI% _BLDG SETBACKS VARY 10' ld Y 6' 1P 11' lY tl' 11 11 6' 1OT 5' Y RLGG SETBACKS VARY �fOMMfRfIAI DRODflC7 TgAIL TURF BIKE THRU THRU LEFTTURN CONCRETE THRU THRU BIKE TURF WALK [OMMCRCIAI PROPCATY RIVO VANE MEDIAN IANr DIVA PHOPUSEU RIGHT UP WAY VARIES MOST COMMONLY HS' VA0.1E5 POTENTIAL RIGHT Or WAY EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY(VARICS 75'95'1 POTENTIAL IMPACT RIGHTOr WAY IMPACT ' Typical Streetscape Cross Section 4 0[CORATIVC RDADL':AY LIGHTING (Without Bike Lanes) —RDUI EVnao cnNOVr TREES Segment C Between 59rh Ave.and 65rh Ave.-Looking Norrh N I �I In m 0 a m � a EX LANDSCAPING C E U L - d 6 CQ7 BLDG SETBACKS VARY 1--L--.' ;ICY 11' 11' I!' B' 11' 13' 10' G 2' BLDG SCTBACYS VARY J LUMMLRCIAI PROPLRTY TRAIL T11Ri 7HR11 iHRtl IFFT 7110.11 CONCRFTf TNRII TMRII TURF SYAIX r(vAMi0.finl pNnr•F-n BLVD MEDIAN BLVD 107' PROPOSED RIGHt Or WAY VARIES MOST CGMMONIY RS' VARIFS NV.F.R number ct enemcnd cant 'p aICnO DrePegY IrplTeroe hyvnd EXISTING RIGIIr OF WAY(VARIES 75'95') POTFNTrA1 P(TTfNTIAI PACT OF WAY d the rXlht ul way shown hers IMPACT RIGHT OF WA'i IMPACT Streetscape Cross Sections 9 Fi ure 8 Consulting GTOA,p,Inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study- Recommended Concept Report 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center I I Typical Streetscape Cross Section 3a Adjacent City Center,Stormwater DMNGWvE ROADWAY Treatment Alternative 11GINf,141711 flANNCIK Segment B Between TN700and 59th MEDIAN CANOPY TREES j BOULEVARD CANOPY TREES Ave.-Looking North FARyI rnNrRrTr PIANTrR nlRn nttf11NG IN + CONCRFIt MAINTENANCE STRIP ,Yr K .Y{DCATIOKt� ALTERNATIVE MEDIAN SWAIE WPM4 MIE YMIES ld VMIES 6' i1' 12' 21' 12' It' 6' ld ]d f RONTAGE TURr 5TORMWAIER71EAIMENT TRAIL IURT BLVD SOLD THRU THNV MEDIAN IIIRU THflU SHOD BLVD WALK OIVO ROAD BLVD 205'-/- TO BLOG EXTENDS TO RESIDCN'fIAL FRONTAGE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY COO SETBACKS ERCI LSVAPY COMMERCIAL PROPERLY p 5 to N1� Typical Stteetscape Cross Section 3b v Adjacent City Center,Median Berm M' = Alternative M Segment B Between THE00 ond5901 0 ROADWAY r` I Ic"TING nNG w170 ml turnlERs N Ave.-Looking North BOULEVARD CANOPY TREES a _ DECORATIVE ROADWAY ,m HGMTING WITH BANNERS o. / d CONCREIEBULLINUS 7,L-L IN C ONCRETE MAINTENANCE STRIP NS 1 w U w6w L, _ Qd nS I E, g rVMI VAR16 30' VARIES 4' 11 11 _12' 10 _12' I1' B' 10' G' iA FRONTAGE TVRf BERM ANO LANDSCAPING TRNL TURF OLVD SHLD TNRU THRU LEFT TURrI M[DU1N THau TIIRU SAID TVPF WALK N ROAD RIVD LANE BLVD .0 +)__ _ EXTENDS TO RFSIDENDAI FRONTAGE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY BLDG SETBACKS VARYTO d COMMERCIAL 2 Streetscape Cross Sections Figure 9 Consulting Group,lnc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center t Osseo Rd. Sviitchback Ramp eroass -- 9 e —�i- Signalized -- fvd – •'r r tersectlon Signalized �, - _ Intersect n Helix 1J � lKRamp .1 � r -, Legend M M Existing Twin Lakes Regional Trail • • • • • Alternative Crossing Route A ar • • • • • Alternative Crossing Route B Xerxes Ave. a 6 • • s Alternative Crossing Route C 0 25' 50' 100' PION I Twin Lakes Regional Trail Grade Separated Crossing Options Figure 10 ['�nsulling Group,In< Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report 75891120731 City of Brooklyn Center ! ! i K ow Colored Connate Urcora,rvr Ballard —ArthltettomlPlanwWall,typ, Single Demative Roadway hMtPan.tyD. Grouping,lyry 10&lundrwusTrail EsdtiogCul de Sac landstapeirlartting bed.typ. light In Blvd.typ. D6t DKWOhr Hood wm landscape Planting Noghbothood Sklewalk Pmenddl Raln Garden 14pirl arhnod Sidewalk Detara:webannerMle- 1 fight In McNen,Wp. Bed IyR Connectian Connection OrnramMtat I'rner,ryP, Gmuping-tyP. r Ally SbUmbird _ p 1 r �* Innrwction ,v- --- _-- a i N Ml 4A I - 7 landWape Plantln98cd G'Standard Gray Concrato CD m Sidewalk.typ- l Pedcinian Plnza v � Turl6oulevxtd,tyR C - AIrMgKtwal t>>tcw,ly Llnnurnen' PMMIdan Rest SloDwith fuinhidngs tylk a l ( cr I �� i Colatet!ConeteCame, tP i tF t Gateway Concept Sketch r" (Southeast Corner) !Z 0 li 2 V 11CON Brooklyn Boulevard/Bass Lake Road Intersection Streetscape Concept 9 — Figure 11 Consulting Group,inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center ,�- °.r.yy' •.•+.r Tt .-,cT mil' fr�.: t4r: _c __ .r.. '► ;,� rrai,° :.,;,.�;1 F' ... -- a JT •,� ���f �.�•-+ .,-'~. r,' '� ,.Y 1w' 4 �� r r' �� . � �! �♦ ~-� �� tt 7� %:G � � t�•t` t � ' X{ .7r - s� `` �t -IO] "I!„/'1r♦,��: f� .,� �1+... +��.' �.,-' a '�71' tLf,.t T; }, r ' ` f ,� h i f. J -.•k _�.- �+ / .»ti u .£,., l 7 `L j � hun P n fz'L I .�- � - r1,• 1.L / rT\rY ._ P � S1 • ,S �. 1. L / L nog 4 it r. - 1f' r Al e'�:de•i t �� -?� t _ `� - T'.� .e.�h '�. T -f8 � � • ti'�R'trrr,Pr f • _ -.�{'f. t� `�„ ��f' �� _ � � ' 'i a ti..� rb 1 ., l•._ ''� f� -�a ' ,C, ,` N.kaI1�PLtlr� �� �,�--'° �y !� �'S1 !¢� � . 30 "'� �' r 6� _r �• '�T,.�•+r •'� ,G' �•.,Lt <� ' yt i— . - ... 1, -I+.F �a.L .,yam •pia r t' y sr+�lt4 .�/�� r - � ��. !' � \.S. � 1 : ►"t'r�,R!�y 1 �--.�" Y .. { rqr .,f' yi' .R "'1Y sir �r� 1,,,, y�• .(. ?`�"�., M r1w ~,ls�,• - - �' t /; •.r-L� ! •'t• a' 'i _ `+C� F r .i.• _ f: }•� , t Sti 4. � �- r. � �:t 1� :� � • f'' ` r'a{ �+s�lL (� . 1 � `:•rte .. +�.. ti,� .' s A,.�•1 '1 C .L � � }.+ i� ,`f __' �'� ,t! `.; Vr. � 1+. � r•. 1 t'll_`• eL C!: , '! 1 Ra ��� "`.. 'Y:�i - � rte'- `.��11� � •� �� +�.' L,s4 ' ��''' if ♦�r� :4 '�rtt '.� _ Streetscape Opportunities Brooklyn Boulevard . It . Recommended Concept Report 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center +R •Boulevard Treatment MAlflIPna11(V Strip , F,��l Turf grass with street trees •Sidewalk or had Sidewalk access to bus stops - SEGMENT A-Between 49th Ave.and r1 it 70 •Enhanced Intersections •Median Treatment •Llghtinq Without banners I u.1h mq without bantioi •Crosswalks at signalized .NARROW MEDIAN •Mnnumrnri .r Pl.mtln s WIDE MEDIAN •Maintenance stop •Crrlwrrl pnvwncnt Turf grass with sheet tree; r' •:+ ;. SEGMENT B-Between rs dnd 59th Ave. L a Enhanced Intersections •Median Treatment `~ a Uyltuuil wale heumo' W)hhnp with bzuuwr: Crosswalks at signalized .NARROW MFOIAN " mrersectrons o •Pavunient with turllards - N •Monuments trulllmly tit 01 tecortdaryl •WIDE MEDIAN _ mPlantings Maintenance stop rn Seaon q and trash IeC e tacMs l rf grass with street en s Ipumary l .Vegetated niedikn(shed) o •ColoredpavemeM. — a •SeIKI ornamental planting Q1 FenongrSerecrang Ipnmaryl areas ia.i..y SEGMENT C-Between 59th m j Ave.and 1.694/1-9,1 � •Enhanced Intersections •Median Treatment CL •Lighting without banners -I ightlug wdhnul banners Crosswalks at signalized NARROW MEDIAN ;E i g Intersections pavement with bollards } " Monuments(primary or .WIDE MEDIAN f secondaryi D plantings •Ma lntenence strip • Colored pavement •Turl grass Willi street frees d Select ornamental planting 'f ' 0 5 ' area5 _ {•:.u.S,y l:ii,i✓,u:�t,'Si,u n•-:.��.�I Io,nl ',,:..ir71.r11ltr:.rtvn Rlarr_r,n'1 dr d l'lintioll V ON I Streetscape Design Elements Figure 13 Consulting Group,Inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center more IN THE PROMSEU BRIDGE lit UECXING PRONCT EXISTING GIRDERS AND PIER SUPPORTS ARE FXPFr.TFD TO RFMAIN ADIIISTMFNIt TO THE GIRDER HEIGHTS MAY BE NECESSARY DEPENDING ON nit SELECTED CROSS SECTION PENDING MDSE MARIE)STRUCTURA1 ANAIYSIS I CHAINLINK FENCE cownrTr BARRIER 12'0" 12'0" 12'0" 6'-0" la'0" IS'0" WALK AUXILIARY THRU THRU LEFT TURN MEDIAN THRU THRU WALK FROM'TH100 2'-9" 2.-9.. LOG'-0" u Existing Bridge Approach-Looking North Existing Bridge Cross Section-Looking South = r 0 N OECONATIVE UGHTIE;G TO MATCH n ROADWAY m m _.• W COEtCRFTr MRRIFRAHD o �-,A'� "ti'-- _Y�f " •y r.ECORATIVE PFUESTRIAN RAILING RAISED CURB m - I U O J C N - L d g �' / i 1••0" 12'0' 13'0" 1110" 11'0" 12'-0" G'0" 12'-0" 11'0 WALK IIIRU THRU LEFT TURN MEDIAN 111HU 1111W IRAII FROM TH100 •1' 106'•0" N - 11 o Bridge Cross Section Alternative-Looking South g` Concept Sketch on Trail Looking North ',YIIh THIN)AuvillAry rntrnnrr 1 am RelalnCrl S V verpass TH 100 O Bridge Re-decking and Enhancement Options Figure 14 Consulting Group,Inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center • 0 • FD C~• 65th Ave and Brooklyn Blvd Park and Ride 0 65 Av N':•65 AV N 63 AV N 63AVN 52 Av N 61 Av 162 Av 61AVN 60 Av N Admiral Ln 59 Av N Brooklyn Center Transit Center 1�I a c Hwy 100 n 0 Hwy 100 �I m 5 _m 0 n 1AvN % 51 AV C% -/ weekday boardings 50 Av N SD Av N N a 49 Av N t° 49 Av N C) 0 1,000 2,000 r A�re than 25 Feet 2 2 • M;� Brooklyn Boulevard Weekday Ridership Figure 15 Consulting Group,he City of Brooklyn Center g 7589120731 ( _ Planting bed or paved area ---7r., _ Low fence 10, Entry path 5' 6' 14' 1 6' s'� Sidewalk/Trail 6-10' 36' Trash receptacle CO Bench I N UI _ • Planting bed r' Low fence cL g 'm 19' CO Low Boarding Location Concept A Figure 16 Consulting Group,Inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report 7589 1 120731 City of Brooklyn Center i ! i s Trash receptacle Bench Entry path 10' - . Low fence Planting bed 51 51 3' 6' 5' 6' S' CO 6-�0" 36' Sidewalk/Trail CL 0 N y UI 7 C; CL i �y N L l0 (7 g D, U) 1; a` x Vk!R I Low Boarding Location Concept B Consulting up, Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report Figure 17 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center i Planting bed or Paved area U Entry path 10' Low fence s' 6' 14' 6' s' Sidewalk/Trail 36' 6-10' Trash receptacle .- 0 Bench N W N C a .•r J � -q 21' " q, g 29' 10 x Medium Boarding Location Concept A Figure 18 Consulting Group,Inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center • s s Bike racks Trash receptacle i Benches J ,�• ; _ Entry path 10' Low fence Planting bed --,�- 6 5 - ' 5, 6' 5, 6-10' - 45 M Sidewalk/Trail r 0 N N N N Of N 'a c t� t 2 C7 g co a) Medium Boarding Location Concept B Consulting Group,Inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report Figure 19 7589 1120731 City of Brooklyn Center Bike locker Bike racks �. Bus shelter F Trash receptacle Bench 10, r"_ Low fence L Planting bed 1 10.5' 1 6' 14' 6' S 5 i 6-10' 51.5' Sidewalk/Trail M — r N Ull - � '.I - _ � �• y _ � � •i _. ,- .'• , � _ fir' ••• . �' � -� O .. f 4 I T L CL E g n a` x High Boarding Location Concept Figure 20 Consulting Group,Inc Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report 7589 1 120731 City of Brooklyn Center • 0 0 Work Session Agenda Item No. 2 1 MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE: August 7, 2012 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer(f' SUBJECT: Earle Brown and Opportunity Area Street Light Replacement Update Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council provide direction to staff regarding the proposed street light replacement project. Background: In December 2010, SEH performed a study of the existing lighting system in the Earle Brown and Opportunity Area (see attached map). The outcome of the study indicated that the existing street light poles have substantial corrosion and many are in need of immediate replacement. A CIP project was recommended and a project value of $232,000 was budgeted in 2012 to replace the street lighting, with the decorative node lighting being replaced at a future time. Including replacement of node lighting at this time would complete the overall lighting system; however, the node lighting was programmed later as they are not structurally failing (the street lighting poles are structurally failing and several have fallen down) and due to budget constraints in the Street Light Fund. The node lights are included in the CIP to be replaced in 2024 with an i estimated$75,000 budget. In June of 2012 the City hired Barr Engineering to perform a detailed analysis and design of the street lighting system (see attached memo). The street lighting options evaluated include decorative lighting� gh g fixtures, similar to those used on the Bass Lake Road and Xerxes projects,. and LED lights. Policy Issues: 1. Does the City Council support proceeding with LED lighting? 2. Does the City Council support proceeding with decorative lighting fixtures? Council Goals: Strategic: 7. We will continue to maintain the city's infrastructure improvements Ongoing: 1. We will provide streamlined, cost effective, quality services with limited resources Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Barr Engineering Company 4700 West 77th Street•Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 Phone:952-832-2600• Fax:952-832-2601 •www.barr.com An EEO Employer BARR Minneapolis, MN•Hibbing, MN•Duluth,MN•Ann Arbor,MI•Jefferson City, MO �g Memorandum Client: City of Brooklyn Center Date: August 3,2012 Project: Earle Brown Area Street Lighting Project By: Scott Hutchins, Barr Engineering Compan During our discussions on the street lighting project we have discussed an array of potential luminaires(light fixture to use in the street lighting project in the area of Earle Brown.The City has provided us with the information luminaires installed during the recent Bass Lake Road Streetscape project.This memorandum is intended to provide some order of magnitude costs to compare the 'decorative'fixture used in the Bass Lake Road Street Scape with more utilitarian or rectilinear ("Shoebox")style fixtures,similar to what presently exists except without the'drop dish' lens(Lens extends below the body of the luminaire)to accommodate cut-off issues and be more'night sky friendly. Further we discussed the downward spiral of the costs of L.E.D. luminaires and its relationship to energy costs and maintenance costs. The decorative fixtures(Lumec Domus Series) installed in the Bass Lake Road Streetscape project were 250w high pressure sodium (HPS) luminaires.This luminaire is available with an L.E.D.source, the 135w L.E.D.source has photometric values that are almost identical to the 250w HP S source. While the final spacing has yet to be determined for the sake of this memorandum we ran the photometry in a 70'x140'area and found the 250w high pressure sodium luminaire produced and average footcandle level of 1.1fc with an average:minimum uniformity ratio of 11:1 and the 135w L.E.D. luminaire produced and average footcandle level of 1.2fc with an average:minimum uniformity ratio of 5.5:1.Thus the L.E.D.source would provide better illuminance that the HPS source which equates to safer lighting.We should also note that the color of the L.E.D. source is `white' versus the orangish color of the HPS source. We offer the rough estimated contractor costs for the following luminaire styles for comparison purposes. 250wHigh Pressure Sodium: Lumec Domus Series $1200 Generic Rectilinear $750 (Medium-high quality) LED(250w HPS Equivalent): Lumec Domus Series $1700 Generic Rectilinear $1150 (Medium-high quality) Barr Engineering Company sill Thus we are observing a $500 to $600 premium/luminaire to go to L.E.D sources over the HPS . sources. This is a significant amount of cost for looking at L.E.D. sources. We offer the following based on a comparison of the Lumec Domus series luminaires: Energy Consumption/luminaire: HPS 250w with 295w input L.E.D. 135w with 138w input Life lamp/L.E.D. Driver: HPS lamp life is 24,000hrs L.E.D. life of 100,000hrs 138w This would equate to a 9-11 year simple payback just on energy (at$0.08/kWH) and reduced maintenance would bring the simple payback down to 4.5-6.5 years based on HPS lamp replacement at 5-years average for HPS systems. L.E.D. luminaires should under be consideration due to the an energy consumption of 47%as compared to HPS luminaires, better light quality, and reduced maintenance. If the City is considering any green initiatives it should also be noted that the L.E.D. system do not have a mercury impact on the environment. The downside is the initial cost of the luminaire. The Earle Brown Area street lighting is anticipated to have 43 pole locations which is an increase of 5 pole locations.The existing pole spacing ranges from 110' to 200' and we anticipate relocation of some pole locations to provide better uniformity for the lighting system. We anticipate retaining thirteen pole locations and associated concrete footings. The following is a summary of costs for Earle Brown Area street lighting based on luminaire and pole type: Installed system costs 250w HPS Domus (decorative luminaire and aluminum pole) $290,250 135w L.E.D. Domus (decorative luminaire and aluminum pole) $311,750 250w HPS rectilinear (Shoe Box luminaire and round straight steel pole) $204,250 140w L.E.D. rectilinear (Shoe Box luminaire and round straight steel pole) $232,200 The installed systems costs include engineering, prefabricated metal foundations, new circuitry, new control enclosures and demolition. We suggest an alternate bid for the L.E.D. lighting system as prices are in flux and many manufacturers want to have L.E.D. lighting in their references. We also suggest and alternate for the low level intersection lighting which we estimate to have an L.E.D. fixture value of$95,000. We have attempted to keep L.E.D./HPS comparison brief and not technically overwhelming, so please feel free to call should you have any further questions. • Barr Engineering Company i t� 1-43-164 Kim Lighting,Inc. -Products : Site/Roadway : The Archetype@ Page 1 of 1 i � 1 The Archetyl OPTICAL SYSTEM f or-Typ II,III, MicroE ' e •!`�� MlcmEmiHer-T ype[I,:, LIGHT SOURCES - L£D Light Emitting Dic P5',Pulse Start Metal 'ir'SHigh Pressure Sc c IF Induction Fluore: ei�" SIZES _ SAR-1T',AR-22" KIMNOW!QUICK SH. (0 KNSAR3l100F, )PMH,KN-AR3y40DPMH,KN-ARS140OPMH MOUNTING CONFlGI •„s. R- ........... Su Ie Coube D.uLIeL Triple Tnp.Y Jued "fell DISTRIBUTIONS N W 'lr , TYp'A Ty,*L Type 1 1 1 Typo 1 1 T'pal/ T+�a� /1/1/111'Nl1r(�r,l�►frr` llllllff� Illrw e211 or T "'III"' ag" LNyb Louele O�ubleL T!1•bT Tnpl9 La ".0 DISTRIBUTIONS 1TT1*h Type L Tyre III T,:pe li. TYN IV Type hq://vvww.kimlighting.com/products/the—archetype 8/4/2012 i 4 t i C r9t t i I I I I I I NY i sM Y John M rtin o. . t ?, STOP -� 4- At fib ' I i b u � 94 • CO v U� • O - W SUMMIT DR N cl� W ✓�y2,� 100 '9,QTi GQ ......... Legend • Existing Node Lights • Existing Street Lights Street Light Replacement Area Public Works - Engineering RROO�II'h' August 7,2012 (:F:VTFR Earle Brown and Opportunity Area a 125 2. moF.., Work Session Agenda Item No. 3 � 1 • MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION . DATE: August 9,2012 TO: City Council FROM: Curt Boganey, City Manager SUBJECT: August 13 Work Session Item No. 3 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider providing direction to staff regarding Environmental Response Funds. Background: Per the enclosed e-mail, Councilmember Lasman has suggested the Council consider if it wishes to take any action regarding funding for the Environmental Response Funds as discussed in the enclosed newspaper article. Policy Issues: . Council Goals: 1. We will proceed aggressively with implementation of City's redevelopment plans • Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Sharon Knutson From: Curt Boganey • Sent: Friday,August 03, 2012 11:46 AM To: Kay Lasman Cc: Sharon Knutson Subject: RE: article in Star and Trib I will have it added to the work session. From: Kay Lasman Sent: Friday,August 03, 2012 11:22 AM To: Curt Boganey Subject. article in Star and-Trib Hi Curt, At the next work session, I would like to discuss the article that was in the MPLS Star and Tribune today, concerning the lack of Environmental Response Funds (ERF) being available to developers, such as Paul Hyde,to redevelop former "brown sites", such as the Josyln Site and the new France Avenue Business Park IV. . I thought the City Council should consider"weighing in" on the negative impact of not having this tool available to developers to work with, in our City, and contact our legislators and other decision makers on reinstating it during the next legislative session. Thank you. Kay 1 StarTribune - Print Page Page 1 of 2 StarTribune • Brownfield development efforts set to lose key revenue source 2r Article by: DON JACOBSON Special to the Star Tribune August 2,2012-11:09 PM Those involved in the cleanup and return of polluted"brownfields" to productive use say they're preparing for the loss of a key tax revenue stream that has been used to pry loose millions of dollars for private investment in contaminated urban sites. But they are vowing to fight at the next state Legislature for its Paul Hyde,president of Real Estate Recycling,has tapped reinstatement,calling it a boon for metro-area cities as employers environmental response funds to build on formerly polluted and multifamily housing developers are increasingly seeking sites like this one in Brooklyn Center. convenient sites for their new buildings. Richard Tsong-1 aatarii,Star Tribune The tools consist of"environmental response funds"(ERF)administered by Hennepin and Ramsey counties. Since 2001,the money has come from mortgage registry and deed fees paid by buyers when properties are transferred or sold within the counties,amounting to 0.01 percent of the property's assessed value--about$15 for a$150,000 transaction. The funds are used to perform the costly cleanups of polluted sites before they can host new development. The fee had been renewed by the Legislature every four years--until the last session,when its renewal was opposed by the • Minnesota Association of Realtors.The group asserted it was an unfair burden on home buyers at a time when affordability was paramount in efforts to break the residential housing slump. The association won the argument,and as a result, Hennepin and Ramsey counties are preparing their last rounds of ERF grants to cities and developers, and leaders in the brownfields restoration movement are mourning its loss,which is set for Jan. 1. Paul Hyde, president of Minneapolis-based Real Estate Recyclers, says the ERF grants have been vital in his company's work to redevelop polluted sites in St. Louis Park, Brooklyn Center and Minneapolis and elsewhere into hundreds of thousands of square feet of new office and warehouse space. "It's so important because we've used it as local funding match,which is required to access the much larger pool of cleanup funds available from the state and Metropolitan Council,"Hyde said. He added that the group's latest project--the 90,000- square-foot France Avenue Business Park IV office-warehouse building on what was once a heavily polluted Superfund site in Brooklyn Center--wouldn't have been possible without the ERF program. "These cleanup efforts aren't getting any cheaper, so if you're going to create jobs,create tax base,and clean up the environment,you need this money,"he said."We have another project in Brooklyn Center,a 60,000-square-foot office- warehouse,which is approved but the site needs a$2.5 million cleanup. If the ERF is gone,we won't be able to leverage enough from the other funds to do it." Hennepin County officials say the nearly 300 grants totaling over$41 million awarded over the years has resulted in an increase of$433 million in property values. Ramsey County claims the$5.6 million it has distributed has helped produce 4,370 permanent jobs and 1,154 units of housing. • One of the users of the Ramsey County funds has been the St. Paul Port Authority,which tapped the ERF for its redevelopment of polluted former railroad shops in the city's North End into the Great Northern Business Parka Lorrie Louder, its director of business and intergovernmental affairs,said it was"critical"in the creation of hundreds of jobs there. htti)://www.startribune.com/l)rintarticle/?id=164800656 8/9/2012 StarTribune - Print Page Page 2 of 2 "We took land that was essentially vacant and we were able to attract four businesses that have invested$11.8 million in new buildings and nearly$500,000 in equipment,"she said."Every year those properties are paying almost$580,000 a year in property taxes." • Louder promised she and other members of the brownfields community would be back at the Legislature to push for its reinstatement. "I'm ready to roll for the next session,"she said."it has a lot of support from the commercial real estate industry,and the chambers of commerce.When you're looking at such a small amount of tax,the benefits far outweigh the modest costs." Don Jacobson is a St. Paul-based freelance writer. ©2011 Star Tribune i • • htttx//www.startribune.com/i)rintarticle/?id=164800656 8/9/2012