Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 09-13 PCP XBJKT ER LYN PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SEPTEMBER 13,2012 STUDY SESSION 1. Call to Order: 7:00 PM 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes—August 16, Regular Session 4. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 5. Presentations a) Brooklyn Boulevard Study Update — Presentation of the Executive Summary (by City Engineer Steve Lillehaug) 6. Planning Application Items with public hearing) a) Loren Van Der Slik/Gatlin Development Planning App. No. 2012-019 PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment (No. 3) to amend the previously approved 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. b) Loren Van Der Slik/Gatlin Development Planning App. No. 2012-011 Consideration of a proposed Preliminary Plat of SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 2ND ADDITION, located in the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD properties. 7. Planning Application Items (without public hearing) - None 8. Discussion Items 9. Adjournment MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION AUGUST 16, 2012 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Rahn at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Sean Rahn, Commissioners Scott Burfeind, Kara Kuykendall, Stan Leino, Carlos Morgan, Michael Parks, and Stephen Schonning were present. Also present were Councilmember Carol Kleven, Director of Business & Development, Gary Eitel, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—AUGUST 2, 2012 There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to approve the minutes of the August 2, 2012 meeting as submitted. The motion passed. Commissioner Burfeind abstained as he was not at the meeting. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Rahn explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. APPLICATION NO. 2012-017 OMAR ABUISNAINEH Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-017, consideration of a Planned Unit Development proposing the rezoning of certain properties from C1 (Service/Office) District and C2 (Commerce) District to a new PUD/C2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce) District, along with Development/Site Plan approval of a parking lot expansion for a restaurant use, for the property addressed as 6901 and 6915 Brooklyn Boulevard. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 8-16-12 for Application No. 2012-017.) Mr. Eitel explained this property was the former Starbuck Coffee restaurant site, approved in 2006 and completed in 2007. The original intent of the building was to accommodate a new Starbucks coffee shop along with one or two other speculative retail/service tenants. These tenant spaces never materialized and the Starbucks closed down in 2010 after three years of business. The main parcel is 0.58 acres (25,414 sq. ft.) in area and is currently zoned C2 (Commerce). The adjacent 6915 Brooklyn Boulevard is a 0.22 acre (9,635 sq. ft.) lot, which used to contain a small residential dwelling and is zoned C 1 (Service-Office). He further explained the applicant is proposing a new "Slim's Pizza" restaurant with indoor seating and drive-thru service and is currently remodeling the building. In order to provide additional parking,the applicant acquired the property to the north of the subject site. Page 1 8-16-12 Mr. Eitel added the applicant is seeking approval to allow a less than 15 ft. parking setback and green-strip requirement along a public street and to allow a substantial reduction to the required 35-foot buffer requirements where a C2 development abuts an R1 district. He described other developments where less than 15 ft. green strip along Brooklyn Boulevard have been allowed along a major thoroughfare where decorative screen walls or other screening devices have been used. He further stated the benefit of this PUD will provide a new single zoning over the two parcels and provide flexibility for redevelopment/expansion of the site. The combining of these two parcels will be considered under separate application. Mr. Eitel stated the development plans call for leaving the main building intact and the primary improvements to be made include adding 25 new parking stalls on the newly acquired lot at 6915 Brooklyn Boulevard; extending and installing new screening fence and landscaping along the westerly and northerly perimeters of the site; and closing off the old driveway that served 6915 Brooklyn Boulevard creating 38 parking stalls to serve the site. Mr. Eitel explained vehicles entering the site from Brooklyn Boulevard will have the ability to go straight, left or right and locate a parking space. Vehicles using the drive-thru service lane will need to turn right, maneuver around the northerly parking drive-aisle and enter into the re- established drive-thru lane along the westerly boundary of the subject site. Vehicles that enter from the south will have no option but to turn right into the parking area. He added the drive-up lane will remain on the west side of the building and be maintained as a one-way drive. Carlos Morgan arrived at 7:20 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-017 There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2012-017, at 7:37 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. The applicant Omar Abuisnaineh, introduced himself to the Commission. Mr. Parks asked if the applicant had any concerns with access to the site. Mr. Abuisnaineh replied that he had a discussion with the County regarding access on the site and he has talked to the other property owners along Brooklyn Boulevard regarding possible acquisition of their properties. He added that he worked with the City to attain the proposed layout. He added that he has another restaurant in New Hope and does not plan for outdoor seating at this time. He also stated that they sell burgers, pizzas and specialize in sandwiches and he feels it is the right concept and right location for his business to be successful. Mr. Adam Ray, 6920 Lee Avenue North, stated he lives kiddie-corner to the home they are tearing down. He questions what the noise level will be with a parking lot in his backyard. He also has concerns with the driving access. He explained this lot has limited access back onto Page 2 8-16-12 Brooklyn Boulevard and he sees people making U-turns down his street and turning around on his block. He added that he and his neighbor had a conversation with the contractor and were told that a fence would be replaced immediately and it has been two weeks and there is no fence. He has now been told the fence will be the last thing put back on the site. He added he has also talked with City Planner Tim Benetti regarding the fence issues. He would also like to know the hours of operation and the expected timeline to open for business. Mr. Abuisnaineh apologized to the resident for any miscommunication regarding the fence. He stated there had been an issue with the County Engineers regarding water shut off which caused a delay in the removal of the house. However, they have applied for a demo permit and will check into getting a temporary fence installed. He also acknowledged potential issues with traffic on Lee Avenue. He added the hours of operation will be 11:00 a.m. to 10 p.m. and they hope to be ready to open end of September once the final plat is approved and the additional parking lot can be created. Mr. Eitel acknowledged there can be delays with a project when dealing with the contractors and permits to work within the County right-of-way. Commissioner Burfeind asked if there would be liquor served. Mr. Abuisnaineh stated this is a family business and no alcohol will be served. Commissioner Kuykendall asked if a temporary construction fence could be installed. Mr. Abuisnaineh replied that he would be happy to do that. There was further discussion regarding the traffic flow along Lee Avenue North going south once leaving the site to get back on to Brooklyn Boulevard heading north. It was suggested by the Commission that a sign be placed that would discourage traffic from going down Lee, north of 69th Avenue North, which is a dead end. Marty Bornholdt, 6939 Lee Avenue North, stated that they have concerns with safety and increased traffic on Lee Avenue North in their neighborhood. She stated she is in favor of the business opening up but would like to see the traffic issues addressed. Mr. Eitel responded that most of the parking will be to the north of the property and many people may find it easier to exit off Brooklyn Boulevard rather than 69th Avenue North. Commissioner Kuykendall stated that with limited ingress and egress to the site, it might be helpful to install directional signs to encourage people leaving the site to take the best route. Commissioner Burfeind suggested keeping all traffic leaving the site use Brooklyn Boulevard only. Mr. Eitel further explained the traffic layout and flow along both 69th Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard including clarifying both roads are County roads. Commissioner Leino stated that he doesn't see an easy solution to these issues but is in favor of moving this proposal forward. He added he agrees that it would be helpful to add signage to guide people back onto northbound Brooklyn Boulevard. Page 3 8-16-12 Mr. Abuisnaineh stated he will put up a temporary fence once the house is demoed and grading is complete until the permanent one can be installed in October. Mr. Gene Wright, 15100 Stone Road, Minnetonka, asked about the hours of operation and when the lights will be on. Mr. Abuisnaineh replied they plan to be open from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. and the lights will only be on when the restaurant is open. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Parks , seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2012-017. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. Commissioner Parks stated that they want the business to be conducive to the residents in the area and also to be successful. He added that he feels a traffic study would be a good idea for this site to keep the traffic off the residential streets. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-18 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-017, SUBMITTED BY_OMAR ABUISNAINEH TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6901 - 6915 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD FROM C-1 (SERVICE/OFFICE) AND C-2 (COMMERCE) TO PUD/C-2 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT—COMMERCE) DISTRICT AND APPROVE A NEW DEVELOPMENT/SITE PLAN There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-18. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners, Burfeind, Kuykendall, Leino, Morgan, Parks and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its August 27, 2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. APPLICATION NO. 2012-018 OMAR ABUISNAINEH Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-018, consideration of proposed Preliminary Plat of MONTY ADDITION, for the property located at the northwest corner of Brooklyn Boulevard and 69`h Avenue North, and addressed as 6901 and 6915 Brooklyn Boulevard. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 8-16-12 for Application No. 2012-018.) Page 4 8-16-12 Mr. Eitel explained the proposed preliminary plat is for the two properties located at the northwest corner of Brooklyn Boulevard and 691h Avenue North and they are identified as 6901 Brooklyn Boulevard and 6915 Brooklyn Boulevard. The plat proposes a new Lot 1, Block 1, MONTY ADDITION. He added the applicant acquired the residential property to the north (6915) of this site, for purposes of expanding the parking for the benefit of the new restaurant. Mr. Eitel described how the applicant was required to combine the two parcels as part of this redevelopment project. He added the main parcel (6901 Brooklyn Blvd) is the former Starbuck's and retail business building, consisting of 0.58 acres (or 25,414 sf.); and is currently situated in the C2 (Commerce) district. The adjacent 6915 Brooklyn Boulevard is a 0.22 acre (9,635 sf.) lot, which previously had a small residential dwelling, and is zoned C1 (Service-Office) district creating a combined area of 0.8 acres. PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-018 There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2012-018, at 8:30 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. No one came forward for the public hearing on Application No. 2012-018. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2012-018. The motion passed unanimously. The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-19 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-018 SUBMITTED BY OMAR ABUISNAINEH A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MONTY ADDITION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6901 AND 6915 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-19. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Kuykendall, Leino, Morgan, Parks and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its August 27, 2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. Page 5 8-16-12 DISCUSSION ITEM There were no discussion items. OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Leino, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:43 p.m. Chair Recorded and transcribed by: Rebecca Crass Page 6 8-16-12 Brooklyn Boulevard Study Project Summary Vision and Goals The Vision and Goals address five topic areas to guide the Brooklyn Boulevard Study: • Roadway functionality • Land Use,Community Character and Redevelopment • Transit • Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities • Implementation Existing Conditions An assessment of the conditions of the existing Brooklyn Boulevard corridor includes: Demographics: Predicted increases in population (17 percent), number of households (11 percent), and employment(58 percent increase in retail employment, 100 percent increase in non-retail employment)drive the need for transportation improvements in the corridor. Land Use: Single family homes directly on Brooklyn Boulevard are guided to other land uses in the City of Brooklyn Center's comprehensive plan.Redevelopment and reconfiguration of these parcels is recommended. Transit: Existing transit routes, service levels, and amenities are generally adequate. Transit effectiveness along the corridor is hindered by lack of pedestrian-oriented compact development that provides destinations for transit users. Trails and Sidewalks: Sidewalk is present throughout the corridor but has inadequate boulevards. Trails are not continuous and better east-west crossings for bicyclists and pedestrians are needed. Streetscaping improvements could provide visual amenities and establish an identity for the corridor. Traffic, Safety, and Access: Specific improvements are recommended such as turn lane modifications, access closures over time,and geometric changes to address safety and traffic operations issues. Environmental and Cultural Constraints:An inventory of existing conditions identifies issues for further study if environmental review is needed for project implementation. Recommended Concept The recommended concept addresses the issues identified in the Existing Conditions section of this report. The recommended concept summarized on the reverse page is a long term vision,with some portions to be phased in using interim concepts. Implementation Plan The planned improvements to Brooklyn Boulevard are to occur in phases over time as funding becomes available. Innovative funding sources may need to be identified for implementation of the overall corridor plan.Preliminary phased improvement projects have been identified as: • Bridge over Highway 100 re-decking and reconfiguration • Intersection,frontage road and access improvements between TH 100 and 65d'Avenue • Bass Lake Road Intersection Reconfiguration • Roadway reconstruction from Bass Lake Road to 650'Avenue • 63`d Avenue Reconstruction • TH 94 Off-ramp reconfiguration • Trail construction • Streetscaping and other aesthetic improvements 1-94 65th Ave N. V N" ;<, 63rd Ave N. P SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FUTURE CONCEPT q2 Corridor Character Segments _-- Segment A ® Segment B .. Segment C ..59th Ave N. Key Features •Trail along the west side throughout the corridor. Bass •Sidewalk along the east side throughout the corridor. Cakeroa Transit Center •10'minimum boulevards throughout(area between �/ the sidewalk and the road). Segment A •Access management. •Median to channelize traffic. Improved traffic operations on major side streets such as 63rd.Ave. Shingle Creek Crossing •Improved boulevard/sidewalk spacing. •Right turn lanes at major side streets. -Improved control of traffic entering from 1-94. 55th Ave N• •Land use change for improved business access. Segment B •Opportunities for streetscaping/amenities for new mall area. yaa •Realignment of frontage roads on west side to improve Brooklyn Boulevard operations. Intersection improvements to better control vehicle speeds. •Improved pedestrian and transit operations. Segment C Reconfigure bridge to accommodate a shoulder and 51 st Ave N. widened trail/sidewalk. •Revised three lane section to facilitate tight driveway spacing. •Improved sidewalk and trail for pedestrians and opportunity to connect with Minneapolis system. 49th Ave N. X*"Kt 3'N TER Application Filed on 08/13/12 City Council action should be taken by 10/12/12(60 Days) Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: September 13,2012 Application No. 2012-019 Applicant: Loren Van Der Slik- Gatlin Development Company Location: Shingle Creek Crossing Request: Planned Unit.Development—Amendment No. 3 INTRODUCTION Gatlin Development Company is requesting a planned unit development (PUD) amendment to the previously approved Shingle Creek Crossing PUD redevelopment plans. The requested amendments consist of a number of changes or additions, which are noted as follows: a. replatting of Lots 12 and 13 into two new lots (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition) and which includes the revising original Building Site D from a 6,175 sq. ft. retail building to a new 8,400 sq. ft. building for mixed retail services and restaurant use with a drive thru service window and lane; and b. replatting of Lots 15, 16 and 17 into four reconfigured lots (Outlot B, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2, Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition) and which includes replacing original Building Site Q (35,660 sq. ft. junior box retail store) with two new mixed retail/restaurant pad sites (new O and Q pad sites); and c. the creation of a new Outlot B for future Shingle Creek day lighting features. The original Shingle Creek Crossing PUD was approved on May 23, 2011, and was subsequently amended(Amendment No. 1) on September 12, 2011; followed by Amendment No. 2 on August 13,. 2012. An updated master plan, labeled Master Plan No. 3 and dated June 2012 is also included as part of this report and provides a general illustration of these proposed amendments. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (AMENDMENTS) 1. Revise original Building Site D from a 6,175 sq.ft. retail building to a new 8,400 sq.ft. building for mixed retail services and restaurant use with a drive thru service. The updated Master Plan —Amendment No. 3 provided by the Developer illustrates a change to the Building D pad site. Building D was originally proposed as a 6,175 sq. ft. retail building. App.No.2012-019 PC 09/13/2012 Page 1 DOSED MONUMENT ---MONUM 6.175sf -- :, ,. OW E D 7,890 r P 1 8 400sf NEENEW I( i The amendment requests a significant increase of this building from 6,175 sf. retail/service use to an 8,400 sf. mixed retail/restaurant use, with a drive-thru service lane for a future end- cap user. As part of the PUD Agreement between Gatlin Development and the City, the Developer is allowed to decrease final building sizes without the need for any PUD amendment or special approvals, but is not allowed to increase building sizes, except in certain cases where a 5% increase is allowed under City Zoning Code Section 35-355. Subdiv. 5.d. The 2,225 sq. ft. difference represents a 36% increase in size. Building D under the May/Sept. 2011 Master Plan illustrated the proposed development on a 0.61 acre lot, with 31 parking spaces or a 5.1 parking ratio. The proposed PUD amendment requests the building to be increased to 8,400 sf. of mixed restaurant/retail service use, with 51 parking spaces (6.07 ratio), while increasing the lot to 1.0 acres. The amendment also provides for the allowance of a new drive-thru service lane to be reserved for the end-cap restaurant user only. As part of the new replatting of Lot 13, Block 1, the original Building E pad site is being reduced from 7,890 sq. ft. to 4,800 sq. ft. of new building. As mentioned previously, buildings are allowed to be reduced (from their original approved size indications) without the need for any PUD amendment or other approvals. App.No.2012-019 PC 09/13/2012 Page 2 OUNTY RD NO 10/BASS LAKE RD A NO 10 I BASS LAKE RD q 5'PARKING 10'Dom&U EASEMENT_ _rOM TY RO r 10'D&U EASEMENT SETBACK WITH —"— DECORATIVE 20'BUILDING NO.10 R.O. 20'BUILDING_ ATION FENCING SETBACK DEDICATI DRIVE-THRU SETBACK B _n _ , "" ... -- exisnNa soEwn.. !OUTLOT A — UTLOT O o— © O A C 8,1TSsf ? of 8 ba 4,/W 12.2250 LOT 11. I LOT 13, BLOCK 1 i BLOCK 1 78 — 8 42 8• *f 1 LOT 12. BLOCK 1 I a b m (L LOT 14, LOT 15. a\ 1 a 10,920sf BLOCK 1 BLOCK 1' �� / L 11 SITE DATA TABLE PARKING BUILDING DESCRIPTION LEGAL LOT AREA BUILDING PROVIDED RATIO D(existing) Lot 12,Block 1 0.67 acres 6,175 sf. 27 spaces 5.1 SCC Addn. D(proposed) Lot 1,Block 1 1.0 acres 8,400 sf. 51 spaces 6.07 SCC 2"°Addn. Although "restaurants" were identified as an allowable use under the original PUD Agreement between Gatlin Development and the City, along with agreeable standards for parking areas, it was understood that most of these sites (i.e. Buildings A, E and M) were planned to be a "sit-down style" restaurants, and not necessarily a convenience-food type facility. Moreover, convenience food restaurants with drive-up facilities are allowed under the prevailing C-2 —Commerce district by means of a special use permit. In some cases, the PUD [amendment] application can substitute as the typical special use permit process. The SCC-PUD Agreement provided a parking standard reduction for retail uses from 5.5 spaces per 1,000 sf. of gross floor area (GFA) to a reduced 4.5 spaces per 1,000 sf. of gross leaseable area(GLA). Restaurants were allowed to reduce from one space per two seats plus one per employee to a reduced 10 per 1,000 sf. of GLA, with an added provision that up to 20% of the GLA in a multi-tenant retail building may be a restaurant use without the need for additional parking. Z Replacing original Building Site Q (35,660 sq. ft. junior box retail store) with two new mixed retail/restaurant pad sites of 7,500 sq. ft. and 6,000 sq. ft. (new O and Q pads, respectively). The original May/September 2011 Master Plan illustrates a proposed 35,600 sq. ft. "junior box retail" store, which was tentatively identified for a proposed Best Buy store. App.No.2012-019 PC 09/13/2012 Page 3 IMPROVEMENTS' PROPOSED SHINGLE > ' ! CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL f PROPOSED DAYLIGHTED SHINGLE CREEK , TRAIL CONNECTION P � � TO EXISTING PRIP'.=E: ztla,crsr ® r to •Y ♦y aax.) s EXISTING SHI GLE CREEK BOX PROPOSED FREEV ) During construction of this Shingle Creek Crossing project, it was discovered by the Developer that this area where the large retail store would sit would be affected by a large pocket of unsuitable soils, which was deemed too costly to remediate and was therefore redesigned. The larger building has been removed and replaced with two new restaurant/retail pad sites as shown in the diagram below. PROPOSED SHI CREEK REGION 7,500sf q EXISTI SHINGL za0o� _b� "OW 1 TRAIL C TO EXI O 20.500 sf Ll Although the two new pad sites combined do not equal the size of the original 35,000 sq. ft. junior box retail they are replacing, these two sites will fit better against the new Shingle Creek day-lighting area and will accommodate two, sit-down style restaurant users with outdoor seating/patio areas. App.No.2012-019 PC 09/13/2012 Page 4 SHINGL --\ \ DAYLIG f \ (EXISTf .; 7' IN A EN . LO , TRAIL tq ti (WIDT ' mow e LOCK ;. S LOT 1; Q 00 LOCK 2 6,000sf 20,500 sf t OUTLOT B SITE DATA TABLE PARKING BUILDING DESCRIPTION LEGAL LOT AREA BUILDING PROVIDED RATIO O(proposed) Lot 2,Block 2 0.75 acres 7,500 sf. 41 spaces 5.47 SCC 2nd Addn. Q(proposed) Lot 3,Block 2 1.0 acres 6,000 sf. 66 spaces 11 SCC 2nd Addn. 3. The creation of a new Outlot B for future Shingle Creek day lighting features. During this same time of construction and redesign, City staff had been in discussions with the Developers in providing space to expand the planned Shingle Creek day lighting areas, specifically to the rear of this original 35,000 sf. building. A revised day-lighting concept was also designed by the Developer's consultants and submitted to the City, along with a revised Master Plan illustrating the removal of the larger junior box and replacing it with two new mixed restaurant/retail users. Unfortunately, there are limited funds to complete this added day-lighting, which is estimated to cost nearly $1 million to install. As part of this 3rd Amendment, the Developers chose to proceed with the request to create these two lots and new pad sites as shown in the following diagrams. App.No.2012-019 PC 09/13/2012 Page 5 PROPOSED SHINGLE r e\ TRAIL CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL Ly (WID <> sa LOCK• EXISTING DAYLI S ' +� ( SHINGLE CREEK LOT . - q Q arty �� A001f .j I .�. •AOOd � ' \ - \\� ` �� TRAILCONNECTI 2O i of ' TO EXISTING BRI rou T LOT i' N 6 EASE�IIENT i U �� � IL a FP,` �, EXISTINGSHI GLE �_ t w / CREEK BOX CU•Lb'ER1 1 —PROPERTY - Since this new Outlot was specifically created to accommodate this additional Shingle Creek day-lighting feature, and since this day-lighting will not be done this year, Staff suggested this specific amendment item be denied, and the proposed outlot area incorporated into the adjacent (proposed) Lots 2 and 3 of this proposed Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition plat. Staff does however, support the concept in allowing additional day-lighting of Shingle Creek in this same "open area" in the future, which we believe can be done under allowances made by a drainage and utility easement placed over these lots. This revision will be addressed more appropriately under the review and consideration of Planning Application No. 2012- 011,the request for Preliminary Plat of Shingle Creek Crossing 2"d Addition. ANALYSIS & FINDINGS Under a typical C-2 Commerce district areas, a special use permit is needed for convenience food restaurants with drive thru service windows. When determining the appropriateness of a convenience food restaurant under an existing or established PUD,the City may elect to allow or permit such uses under a typical PUD Amendment process, as is being done under this particular application. Moreover, the same standards used for determining or granting special use permits May be considered,which are noted under Zoning Code Sect. 35-220; Subpar. 2. Standards for Special Use Permits, as follows: a. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. b. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. c. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. d. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. e. The special use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the App.No.2012-019 PC 09/13/2012 Page 6 The transition of original Bldg. D to a new mixed use/restaurant user with a drive thru lane is the second type of request made by the Developers in this PUD. Under the original SCC PUD Agreements, eating establishments were designated for Lots 6 (Bldg. A), 13 (Bldg. E) and 15 (Bldg. M) of Shingle Creek Addition. There were no plans (at that time) to have any restaurant users with drive-up windows or lanes under this original PUD plan. At the previous August 2, 2012 PC meeting, the Commission approved a recommendation to the City Council to allow the addition of two more eating establishments on this site, with each building site allowed a drive thru service lane/pick-up window. One of these sites, Bldg. C, was originally planned to be a bank with drive-up window service lanes, while new Bldg. G was redesigned to accommodate a drive-up window lane for a proposed coffee shop on the end-cap of said building. New Bldg. D mimics this Bldg. G layout and size, with the drive-up window to serve only an end-cap user. At the August 2nd meeting, a few of the Planning Commissioners made comments and raised concerns of allowing more convenience food restaurants with drive-up windows inside this PUD site. The Developer is aware of these concerns raised by the PC, as well as reservations made by city staff in previous discussions regarding these types of improvement and amendments. However, the Developer has indicated that in the development and marketing of this site since the approval last May 2011, a majority of the businesses interested in developing or occupying this site have been convenience food type restaurants, which normally request or require drive-up windows. This is not to say all hope is lost on the possibility of having sit-down style restaurants operating inside this PUD, because the Developer continues to pursue eating establishments that do not require drive-up windows, and has specifically reserved four of these pad sites for such uses. The original PUD Plan to have only three "eating establishments" has now increased to possibly seven eating establishments, with three to have drive-up window/lanes as part of their service operations. At this time, only one building site (Bldg. C) has been targeted for a stand-alone eating establishments with a drive-up window/lane. The approved Bldg. G and this proposed Bldg. D intend to have end-cap users with drive-up window service lanes. The remaining four eating establishment sites (Bldgs. B, E, M and Q) are identified as either future stand-alone sites or mixed retail/restaurant uses, with outdoor patio/dining areas, and all without drive-up windows. Even with the changes comprehended under redesigned Bldg. D and the drive-up window lane, Staff does not object to allowing or permitting a drive-up window lane feature as part of this proposed (amended) restaurant use. Convenience food restaurants with drive-up windows are allowed by special use permit under the C2 (Commerce) District, which is the underlying and prevailing zoning of this PUD site. These types of restaurants however, are excluded from any C2 Zone if said use abuts an R1, R2 or R3 residential zoning district, which in this case is not a factor. Similar to the same findings Staff made under the previous consideration of Bldg. G (at the August 2nd PC report/presentations), the transition of Bldg. D to a new 8,400 sf. mixed-use restaurant and retail use may: App.No.2012-019 PC 09/13/2012 Page 7 a) promote and enhance the general public welfare of this PUD, as it maintains and keeps the redevelopment activity of this site intact and ongoing, b) reflect a current need or benefit to the Site as requested by the Developer, c) not be a detriment or danger to the public. d) not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other uses in this PUD; e) not impede the normal orderly development and proposed improvements of this PUD; and f) is shown to have adequate measures will be taken to provide suitable access to the site. The redesign of Bldg. Site Q with two new, smaller mixed use/restaurant users is also supported by the same findings noted above. The added Outlot D and additional day-lighting of Shingle Creek is notable, but is not able to be done at this time. Assuming additional funds may be secured in the near future, the Developer is amendable to providing additional day-lighting measures in this area targeted as Outlot B. The areas of said outlot will be incorporated into the abutting lots pro�osed under the Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition, which are Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 of said 2" Addition. For documentation sakes, this request for creating this Outlot B needs to be denied, but a supporting statement that this same area may be used for additional day-lighting of Shingle Creek is encouraged and approved. REPLATTING ISSUES The changes comprehended under this PUD Amendment request includes the reconfiguration of a few lot lines and creation of new lots to accommodate these individual building sites. These specific lot changes and other lot modifications to be made throughout this PUD site are to be considered under the separate preliminary plat of Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition, which is will be considered immediately following this matter. Under approvals comprehended herein, conditions will be added that relate to these plat changes, both preliminary and final plats, which must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2012-20, which comprehends the approval of Planning Application No. 2012-019, which proposes a Planned Unit Development(PUD)Amendment to allow changes to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, subject to the following conditions and allowances: 1. Allow the revision of original Building Site D from a 6,175 sq. ft. retail building to a new 8,400 sq. ft. building for mixed retail services and restaurant use with a drive thru service window and lane; App.No.2012-019 PC 09/13/2012 Page 8 2. Allow the replacing of original Building Site Q (35,660 sq. ft.junior box retail store) with two new mixed retail/restaurant pad sites of 7,500 sq. ft. and 6,000 sq. ft. (new O and Q pads, respectively). 3. Deny the creation of new Outlot B under proposed Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition, but instead allow the same area to be replatted or incorporated into the proposed abutting lots (Lot 1 and 2, Block 2 of Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition) and further allow for the future additional day-lighting of Shingle Creek in this same area; 4. The approval of these lot reconfigurations shall be made under separate plat application, with final plat approval by the City Engineer and City Council; 5. Unless amended otherwise or under separate, new agreement, all existing provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall apply to these sites comprehended under this planning application (No. 2012-019) and all shall remain in effect for the entire Shingle Creek Crossing PUD project site. 6. The overall approval of the Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan, labeled as "Amendment No. 3" and dated August 2012, shall be recognized as an approved and updated master plan of this Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. Any future PUD amendments or application requests will require the submittal and adoption (acceptance) of an updated master plan, which plan shall govern the planned and future redevelopment areas of this site. 7. Execution of a PUD Amendment agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. Attachments • Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan(May 2011) • Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan No. 3 (August 2012) • August 13, 2012 PUD Amendment Plan Set App.No.2012-019 PC 09/13/2012 Page 9 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-20 RESOLUTION REGARDING RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-019 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK (FOR GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (NUMBER 3) TO THE 2011 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PUD WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center adopted City Resolution No. 2011-85, dated June 13, 2011, which approved the establishment of the original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development,and which included an approved Development/Master Plan and certain allowances and development standards that would govern over the PUD; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center subsequently adopted City Resolution No. 2011-127, dated September 12, 2011, which approved the first amendment to the original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center subsequently adopted City Resolution No. 2012-106, dated August 13, 2012, which approved the second amendment to the original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company (Applicant) submitted Planning Application No. 2012-019, which proposes a third amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, by allowing certain changes to the approved 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends additional adjustments not approved under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development and the related 2011 PUD Agreement,which are noted as follows: 1. replatting of Lots 12 and 13 into two new lots (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition) and which includes the revising original Building Site D from a 6,175 sq. ft. retail building to a new 8,400 sq. ft. building for mixed retail services and restaurant use with a drive thru service window and lane; and 2. replatting of Lots 15, 16 and 17 into four reconfigured lots (Outlot B, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2, Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition) and which includes replacing original Building Site Q (35,660 sq. ft.junior box retail store) with two new mixed retail/restaurant pad sites (new O and Q pad sites); and 1 3. the creation of a new Outlot B for future Shingle Creek day lighting features. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on September 13, 2012, whereby a staff report and public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development Amendment were received and considered by the Planning Commission; the Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development Amendment request in light of all testimony received, including the guidelines for evaluating such amendments as contained in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center did determine that Planning Application No. 2012-019, as submitted by Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company, may be approved based upon the following considerations: A. The Planned Unit Development Amendment is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. B. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. C. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. D. The Planned Unit Development Amendment proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this development can be considered an asset to the community. E. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating Planned Unit Development Amendment as contained in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2012-019 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. Allow the revision of original Building Site D from a 6,175 sq. ft. retail building to a new 8,400 sq. ft. building for mixed retail services and restaurant use with a drive thru service window and lane; 2 2. Allow the replacing of original Building Site Q (35,660 sq. ft.junior box retail store) with two new mixed retail/restaurant pad sites of 7,500 sq. ft. and 6,000 sq. ft. (new O and Q pads,respectively). 3. Deny the creation of new Outlot B under proposed Shingle Creek Crossing 2"d Addition, but instead allow the same area to be replatted or incorporated into the proposed abutting lots (Lot 1 and 2, Block 2 of Shingle Creek Crossing 2"d Addition) and further allow for the future additional day-lighting of Shingle Creek in this same area; 4. The approval of these lot reconfigurations shall be made under separate plat application, with final plat approval by the City Engineer and City Council; 5. Unless amended otherwise or under separate, new agreement, all existing provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall apply to these sites comprehended under this planning application (No. 2012-019) and all shall remain in effect for the entire Shingle Creek Crossing PUD project site. 6. The overall approval of the Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan, labeled as "Amendment No. 3" and dated August 2012, shall be recognized as an approved and updated master plan of this Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. Any future PUD amendments or application requests will require the submittal and adoption (acceptance) of an updated master plan, which plan shall govern the planned and future redevelopment areas of this site. 7. Execution of a PUD Amendment agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. September 13, 2012 Date Chair ATTEST: Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the.following voted in favor thereof- 3 Chair, Commissioners and the following voted against the same: . whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 4 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 7, 2012 TO: Tim Benetti,Planning and Zoning specialist FROM: Bruce Johnson,Engineering Technician Supervisor Steve Lillehaug,Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Works Review of Planning Application for Planned Unit Development Amendment No. 3—Shingle Creek Crossing Public Works Department staff reviewed the documents submitted for review for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment for sites D, E, O, and Q dated August 13, 2012, and provides the following recommendations, comments and conditions: 1. The following comments are contingent upon preliminary and final plat approval and final site plan and land alteration/building permit submittal and approval for Phase 2 of the Shingle Creek Crossing development. Additionally, this review only includes a review of the revisions contained within sites D, E, O, and Q. Other site revisions are apparent on the drawings outside of these sites, are inconsistent with the previously approved PUD and amendments, and have not been included as part of this review. 2. Eliminate Outlot B as shown in the proposed PUD drawings. Outlot B property area should remain consistent with the originally approved plat for Shingle Creek Crossing and remain attached to the adjacent parcels. Plans should be updated to likewise include this area as being integrated and well designed with these adjacent lots. 3. Site D has been revised and now includes a drive-thru, which is not consistent with the originally approved PUD. 4. Provide trash enclosure area details and locations for proposed PUD amendment sites O and Q. 5. No portion of building or appurtenant structures may encroach on the City drainage and utility easement. 6. Provide an updated major access routes exhibit for the entire development that includes defined truck routes to all sites(proposed and existing), and all loading dock areas(proposed and existing including Sears). All major routes that include truck traffic must be designed with a heavy duty pavement section. 7. The loading dock and truck turning/backing areas for site S/N must be fully separated from public customer parking areas on site Q and must not direct or invite public parking ingress/egress routes through loading dock and turning/backing areas. Final access routes and turning movements for all loading dock areas will be subject to final City review and approval conditions of the Preliminary Plan and Final Plat. All items, recommendations and conditions are preliminary planned unit development review comments only and are meant to represent and guide the future planning and development of site plans and the corresponding revisions to the property plat and easements that are necessary. All conditions are subject to further review, revision and approval as part of any future re-platting and site plan review. r ,• Or OIL Till In 0-0-0000w CL's O Q�JOJ4' / L) Q ' d - - - ---- J' } COUNTY ROAD N� �� PROPOSED PYLON SIGN �{ = PROPOSED PYLON SIGN PROPOSED MONUMENT G. -- +Ar * • t _ SIGN r ke Y PROPOSED MONU ENT' ' # SIGN �`�%' t?•7�t _ 'E} .; ' / JJ''J J JJ � � IF i s J - J _ T 1 ` 'As <1i •4. � �/ Fr ROHI'& f �! 'JJJJ f � J JJ J .° "air � ���-RIFFLES AND M.' 'IMPROVEMENTS ' J. A7Qd 4 PROPOSED SHINGLE '' J J 'G 4 CREEK L � �� ,r•,j fr ;.. , — / _ DIRECTIONAL I I J ' !/ .•7 ;"l�t _ #.�. ,� Y Y •e / r — 1 SIGN „ PROPOSED DAYLIGHTED J '" r ` - d .,. �• SHINGLE REEK SHI J - — A _40 - , RAIL CONNECTION RAIN GARDEN " • TO EXISTING BRIDGE ✓ � . — — (TYP.) Z — PROPPSE 1,7 PYLON SIGN t EXISTING *, r' BUILDING. 00 Walmart:f+r. STORE 45625.00 f' ti RETAIL ,y. 4 SHOPS GA 80-SGL-NO r G 181,943 S.F.(APPROX.) ! • \ �3z EXITING SHINGLE + " CREEK BOX CULVERT PROPOSED FREEWAY 6 !! PYLON SIGN 1 T / ` � • � ';� FIL RATION AREA TYP. y�, t EXISTING d , CONTRACT) 1(v�V i SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING OUTLO BROOKLYN CENTER, MN MAST >G ��Yr� _ • - 11 l _ =J ER PLAN PROPOSED PYON SIGN a1 " „< . -' J'` F` Au ust 20 PROPOSED FIR EWAY / J t k "\ �T PYLON SIGN / G��P ? 0 60 120 240 FT Kimley-Horn . ,•µ' - GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and Associates, Inc. j; J , ,,�'J j { IMPROVEMENTS TOSEARSPARCELISNOTPARTOFTHISPUDAND Tel 615-446-7104 t 37055 NOTE: 10I So� ,' Tennessee 37055 . ARE SUBJECTTO CITY APPROVAL. Fax:615-446-7105 4 i O4 ; 0, N 13 1 nlls ooa.. 000�c� -` rC�j- •' - - o00 0 COUNTY ROAD 7U �ww----------------- 00 0 _ PYLON SIGN -w ' ce o _ ONUMENT SIGN ) �1%f,�1%=- ° PYLON SIGN MONUMENT SIGN y ,. '�MONU E.�A PIT SIGN � �`r .p# ., — .�' _ f '°, • r , j Ai b 1',I log \ t: of X , I b i 1 a � G r \ ' O t 'ir! ! e,400ar -m ^ - .= '� - PROPOSED SHINGLE CREEK REGIONAL T IL f , - 1 t r Ff 7; r - ° ° DIRECTIONA. smr '_! � '�.,EXISTING DAYLIGHTED • j. �Fe E CREEK �€ �• - Jr / r. � - �1'i B13 r Qom. ,� it L, h LEB S bs J a 6I CONNECTION EXISTING BRIDGE U r PYLOY toG N ` EXISTING BUILDING ,t' { 769,555 S.P. (APPROX.) *ft„ Walmart `” EXISTING SHINPLE r LU x �t .CREEK BOX CUL ERT: r N- EEWAY PYLON SIGN , EXISTING FILTRATION '• - ent NO. 3 .AREA(TYP.),. Amendment POST NTIAL � Sears goo SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING It,Njl SEPARATIONS i .J i ! ► w v�� � �- BROOKLYN CENTER, MN -- 1 ; � � � MASTER PLAN t'j C\C�6x / FREEWAY PYLON SIGN AUGUST!! , %F- __�'11��t _ � I -�, '' ST 2012 Ile pin V !9 Q � f �t I 551 H AVENUE r /� \G 0 60 120 240 FT e ty a� vp ., 0 Kimley-Horn CATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and Associates, Inc. ,It `,� •. sro 101 South Main Street 2550 UNIWRSTY A , INNESO E SEST ,, SU '/ Dickson,Tennessee 37055 Si. a TEL NO. (651) 645-4197 i . i.,. Tel 615446-7104 FAX NO. (651)645-5116 1 ," ✓ - Fax 615-446-7105 DAYLIGHTED SHINGLE CREEK II PROPOSED SHINGLE \ �CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL i✓ r i PROPOSED BUILDING • E_TAINING WALL WITH / + RAILING(TYP.) +� + � PROPOSED EVERGREEN + TREE(TYP) a PATIO I + LIJ 9 BERM � _. � + co L . i. ,! / • - 1, PROPOSED ADDITIONAL t SHINGLE CREEK DAYLIGHTING 7 1 F • PROPOSED t. • H M-. • ,,. �� �� �� - - + i ORNAMENTAL T } 1, • �� _ TREE E(TYP.) �i SHRUB/PERENNIAL J • • • fit +, + BED(TYP.) - OVERLOOK& -' PROPOSED FREEWAY PROPOSED OVERSTORY PROPOSED SMALL SEATING AREA PYLON SIGN TREE(TYP.) TREE(TYP.) PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED WATERFALL TURF(TYP.) WITH RAILING(TYP.) --------WATER FEATURE ----------- PROPOSED ADDITIONAL SHINGLE CREEK DAY-LIGHITNG (OLITLOT B AREA) SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING Kimley-Horn GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and Associates,Inc, BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 0 10 20 40 FT AUGUST 2012 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE. WEST, SUITE 238N 101 South Main Street ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA 55114 Dickson,Tennessee 37055 'EL.NO. (651)645-4197 Tel 615-446-7104 FAX.NO.(651)645-5116 Fax 615-446-7105 m METRO TRANSIT STATION EXISTING EXISTING FULL EXISTING FULL o TRAFFIC ACCESS COUNTY RD NO 10/BASS LAKE RD ACCESS TRAFFIC SIG14AL TRAFFIC SIGNAL 10'D&U EASEMENT SIGNAL TOT x v DRIVE-THRU ( 20'BUILDING DRIVE-THRU - 20'BUILDING SETBACK DRIVE-THRU SETBACK 1 o. 1111 EXISTING SDEWALK EXISTING SDEWAL N _ _ EXISTING bI --- -- _— — —_— — — __—_ ---- _--_ ° 15'BUILDING — _- - - o- _ _ --�— - SETBACK --M -- _ — - F 40 / ® ® d 4 E UTL O OT A _ HARA C J e o-aoI / �GF / O a•eaosf 'PRIVE-T PUD 10'D&U /'' O O EASEMENT C O�S��F �\ d d 84 t s,aoobr -BOUNDARY / � 11,zoobt =' ' •- be \ s 14,0003r \ (TYP.) \\ O sq CK sN1ALL ---� LOT1, EXISTING 35'BUILDING / B as,000br -? a aEraL \ 4 a4 \ KOHL'S 1C b SETBACK / 8,500sf • OT 2, LOT 3, Y e T �\ \ :�c// \\ L \\\\\ 20',&U BLOCK 1 q \ 1 K \ \ \ r \\ \\\\ \EASEMENT /i m - a y ev 9,SOOsr \\ • �q !q I \ \ / RAINAGE& O v /� z I 7,s00gr -- UTILITY EASEMENT s L \\ (WIDTH VARIES) \\ //// Y m / A 11,200 0 \ --SHINGLE CREEK\ 8'400sf e q _ _— —_— / / DAYLIGHTING \ (EXISTING) \\ EASEMENT \\ \ T N O \ \\ // 11 O ° k�/i / s pR0 �\ / D ILI E LO \ \ /// ❑ \ TRAIL EASEMENT \\v// LOT 1, \�\g q (WIDTH VARIES) E BLOCKI �� A v e� LOCK o � LOTI, � W 7,400gr LOCK 2 4 6,ODDSr '/ _ / EXISTING / FULL / C\ 7 �EP \ PHASE I \\ O / �fp� - ACCES$/ �� ID \ IMPROVEMENTS-- \ �y 20,5003r (TYP.) \\ OUTLOT E E P� EASE ENT ' 35'D &U a II EXISTING BUILDING: \ EXISTING a�� EASEMENT /�\ 2 I / Q U) a 169,555 SF \ �\ Walmart.�. / h / // SYMBOL LEGEND: Z 9,555 S FPI ———— PROPERTY LINE 11 (APPROX.) PROPOSED LIGHT POLE(SEE LIGHTING PROPERTY •-"i ♦ PLAN FOR FIXTURE LEGEND) LU a PUD BOUNDARY — X LL LINE WATER FEATURE/STORMWATER Z LLI O ° TREATMENT AREA ZO w Z 1 `j \ \\ // / P � / // PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK U J w PROPOSED PATIO AREA O a LU LLJ 1Py� SIGN LEGEND: = w U p MONUMENT SIGN P PYLON SIGN a /� / / / // y�� 5 FP FREEWAY PYLON SIGN aK / EXISTING \\ / /// O\�G SEARS \ \ / / // �J\� SITE DATA TABLE Z Z SS ✓ \ o BUILDING DESIGNATION LOT AREA BUILDING PARKING PROVIDED RATIO Z o /POTENTIAL SEPARATION - / /// ✓ LPG�� EXISTING BUILDING LOT 1,BLOCK 1 14.83 ACRES 169,555 30.Fr. 733 SPACES 4.50 (n P`�P5 'A LOT 5.BLOCK 1 0.70 ACRES 3.400 30.Fr. 40 SPACES 4.76 O w ; 1 O' U \� •••g LOT 2.BLOCK 1 1.45 ACRES 8,500 50.Fr. 105 SPACES 1135 I jJ WI EA ENT \ % /'/ ^O`.�V •"C LOT 4.BLOCIK1 0.85 ACRES 2,488 so.Fr, 27 SPACES 10.65 0 EXISTING /J/ /// / ` "D LOT 1,BLOCK 100ACRES B,IW 30.FT. 51 SPACES 8.07 Z 8 / ST ORMWATER Y ° `I / PUD BOUNDARY(TYP.) FP //// / E LOT O19ACRES /,80030 Fr. 48 SPACES 4.50 LLI 'Z \ / /// 'F LOT I.BLOCK2 ,.,B ACRES /(00030.Fr. 63 SPACES 1.50 W U / •G LOT 11,BLOCK, 1.M ACRES 8,120 30.Fr. 87 SPACES 8.77 4 � Z t •••H LOT 5,BLOCK, 1.25 ACRES 11,2oo g0.Fr. 54 SPACES 4.82 f I���JJJ YYY��1 G 1 1 —i LOTS BLOCKI 3.09ACRES 3B.OLILI SO.Fr. 187 SPACES 4.92 ' 00 ° �\ // •K LOT 10,BLOOK 1 1.19 ACRES 9,50[1 SO Fr. 15 SPACES 4.74 J ui % \ /// •L LOT 14,BLOCK 1 1.19 ACRES 11,200 Sa.FT. 59 SPACES 5.27 J O 1 EXISTING / e •M LOT I5,BLOCKI 1.16ACRES 7,500 SO.Fr. WSPACES ,0.87 '^ Z fr FULL O v .1 LOTI,BLOCK2 2.49 ACRES 20,500 SO.Fr. 93 SPACES 4.54 V O Z c`2 u ACCESS 45'NSP -o LOT 2,BlACK2 0.75 ACRES 7,500 SO.Fr. 41 SPACES 5.17 Z W i oI` EASEMENT •'0 LOT 3,BLOCK2 0.99 ACRES 6.00050.Fr. 385PACE5 1,.00 = m z W f:�, ••g LOT 1,BLCCK2 - 7.400 SO.Fr. o NORTH VJ UI Y I "POTENRI�FVBUC OUTLOT8 1.35 ACRES - - DATE L, } TOTAL 35.63 ACRES 343,38330.FT. 1813 SPACES 5.28 06�1ATE " I 0 100 200 PROJECT NO. Y SEE SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING�ADDRION LOTS TO BE REPLATTED AS PART OF SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING-3RDAODRION 160633001 E 5 SCALE FEET SHEET NUMBER x 01 oa o € Drawing name: K:\IWC_LUEV\(;AILIN JLVtLUNMLNI\IjRUUKDALL UtNItK\I;AUU\Ynase L\tAHIC—\— - nAbl—LATVUI.awg Aug ..TOpm My. —....g- 11.tlooumenl.D,,.0 r.10 lNe conaeptp pM Eeplgr,prspsntetl Nerein,w-1-trument of psrvke.k Intentletl only fof th,pp 011,p p—ontl Client for whl,N It wac pre—d.Reuae of antl Improper rsllancw on tNic tl--rt witflout written a rn YY< v� pvE Q �ep A" ` r, D // f7I u � A \\ hJ ICY _�,�%�\ I I�✓rI I III �(it�.�.� X� I \v N. v �v ��zvV N, EE �q g\ \ O V \ KT-/ \/ m In 0 ", — i 1 CD 1, II I I I I I t � ��WO NO I 1 SI I g I Iq O SCALE DESIGN ENGINEER: O m SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PHASE II CONCEPTUAL DESIGNED BY WILLIAM D. MATZEK ��� nlAy-Hom and Associates,Inc. N w�N BROOKLYN CENTER, MN DEVELOPMENT PLANS DRAM By MINNESOTA REdS RA➢O NUMBER o C 2009 KIMLEY-HDFN AND ASSDCIATES.INC. � O Z 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE wES T,SUITE 23&1 ST.PAUL,NN 55114 PHASING EXHIBIT PHONE:651-645-4197 FAX 651-645-5116 A CHECKED By HENNEPIN MINNESOTA DATE: www.XNLEY-HDRN.caf No. REV1510NS DATE B )rowing name: K:\TWC—LDEV\GATLIN DEVELOPMENTNEROOKOALE CENTER\CAUU\Phase This document.together with the concepla-d tlesigm P--tetl herNn,man inatrumen!of aerv¢e,to intentletl only(w the apecifc purpose Pnd client for which it roa prepared.Reuse of-d improper-Ii—on this document without wrillen Puthorizptipn and pdppt,U-by—il H—and Associates.Inc,shall be without Iimbilily!o Kimley—H—and Assoc iptea.Inc. o \ �m m Cg C. rn 9 ti o �m NCO •a ♦• a YN T Q 852 p 1 ,�� ' • ass �'� 851 \\ • V - ♦yO 0 � � � ♦ .0 O •19 850 s ao N o 0'50 00 R j, 850 :__ S 1 ♦ s i, F q o 850 ♦�♦ 6a8 I ♦�♦ 849 —.� o I a ', ♦I... gAT �s , ♦♦.♦ 84 Q 6 rt C 845 'A FIT rro GI m x o ` -I)-�> - e 8 z �0 V, •• \�i♦ 0 \ a CX6 lb I. aAg n m o ° i -0 PHASE II CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS m N o o 1> m Kimley-Hom m and Associates,Inc. N J g V) o m D m o m m rDp, :—G7 ° fTl o > D n ° D C D D o D N A p D m D D moy = g = pD� 2550 UNIVERSIIV AVENUE NEST.SUITE 236N Si.PAUL,NN 55114 ENUEYWST.SUITE n y g = Q 2 O ai c mF HENNEPIN MINNESOTA SHEET 3 OF 11 CHECKED BY �O PHONE:651-645-4197 FAX 651-645-5116 WWW.KINLEY—HORN.coM No. REVISIONS a OC n BY ■ 8A9 ■ ■ m ■ 848 ■ m 944 IN Z Z a m - i 0 m oo� SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PHASE II CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS SCALE DESIGNED BY DEStON ENGINEER: WILLIAM D. MATZEK Kimley-Hom m and Associates,Inc. _ (,� o BROOKLYN CENTER, MN EXISTING GRADING EXHIBIT DRANK BY MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NUMBER: ©2009 ASSOCIATES INC. m SZ 2550 UNIVERSIIV AVENUE NEST.SUITE 236N Si.PAUL,NN 55114 ENUEYWST.SUITE p 2 O ro HENNEPIN MINNESOTA SHEET 3 OF 11 CHECKED BY DATE: PHONE:651-645-4197 FAX 651-645-5116 WWW.KINLEY—HORN.coM No. REVISIONS DATE BY )rowing name: K:\TWC—LDEV\GATLIN DEVELOPMEN T\BROOKD ALE CENTER\CADO\Phase 2\EXHIHIIJ\u4 — Un UINUi KUIUJ U LATUUI.owg — AUy 1, 4111 .11PIll ly. .11-1--y—l- This document.la th with tha concepla and daai9na p eaented herNn,as an inatrumenl of aemce,�s intended only far the specific pu pose and client for which it was re arrld.Reuse otF d'm ops reliance on thin tlocument without written authorization and od,pi,b-by Kbnlay-HOrn on r r p p 852 �,r `r - 52 —«n- ,3 � J f v- -+.-' Z m v � m� V� v' v\ w � ; i o \ d � /A Al / / y / i�� 2,1 ♦ _ v �� ♦ S�_� �\� to Y rdt� ;A\ esa N � A �. ''; t \> 7 --850 850 I f yCo > p 850 m vvvv v vv vvv vev v z e) \\\ \ \0 yvvv �v v v vv r X oAv \ \ IJ N` m Z O 1 o Z M`8 i I m x II � O 6®� • � � � I , Z A pp� x x V C, C, O O C ti -t V y y vDi m O 4 N O O O O O O m0 p Z > Z Z s O p A A o C)m O Z () z z m A A m V N Z m � 0 4 c Z A A A y Z A m R g > A N O m 0 1 c m 0 n TIT t X �I / I' r I Ic II I . 55jJIff III ; ICI 8 , 111 II / 1 � \ i / 1 : e CA I m r O cn m bt ee m r t �`, W r. `p �u...w mex T pOS7 - m7 D DN z m r O �m m rai & I �m 8 A P v; am I ✓ \ i _ r I r m Y r i i Ia' �� 'z v vv m rl Lv Y v � 1 PHASE II CONCEPTUAL SCALE DESIGN ENGINEER: EM"m rnA °oo WILLIAM D. MATZEK Kimley-Hom O ono SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING DEVELOPMENT PLANS DESIGNED and Associates,lnc. m m (�y MINNESOTA REGISMA70N NUMBER: C o=o� BROOKLYN CENTER, MN PROPOSED GRADING EXHIBIT DRANK BY ©2009 KIN EY—HDRN AND ASSOCIATES,INC. 1550 UNIVERSITY AVENVE NEST,SUITE 2 N SIT.PAUL,NN 55114 m r O N CHECKED BY PHONE:651-645-4197 FAX 651-615-5118 n HENNEPIN MINNESOTA SHEET 4 OF 11 DATE: R—KIMLEY-HORN.CON No. REVISIONS DATE ]BY c D7 - o — oY p ._ __ - E4Z E51 --_ _ COUN Y ROAD NO. 10 x - - 15" '10, —� rt d 5(„ 10 11 ,. o 2'x4 s C' U \ e,400sr �I CULVERT RT 11,z0osf ` :G�.I. I. o _ /' �\✓ O \, �'$„`� E15” - E18 18" 1��� \\ j.E14ISTI � s 1 RE""`L 15 15 V E15,,, EXISTING ;,� , \ : — TORMCEPTOR - �,y/ :6 EX�STIN� 850OOsf -1,' i,,,' rE15"� ( KOHL'S / � E18" 1 " ,I `° � I �` z E �$ , - 9,500sf 15 E15 rr IT �� "<� t I i SMALL 'i \ RETAIL 7,5oosf DAY-LIGHTED E / /I E18'1 �I SHINGLE CREEK \ o fah w / /� 8,400sf 5 1 — �; \' 11.zoo I �' XISTING _ r � SSTORMCEPTOR 6�, \ 24 - - E24" 15,. Q '� Q- \ E o r �4 24' -E 15" �' It! sz W \ E15" ' E18" F.2� _° ti_ 5" E24 I�17.5ooE / \\ �i� �. El U I 36 � � EXISTING " E2.3' l V �` - SEDIMENT 0 D, 10I',\ CULVERT E23 X36 V" Im TRAP E15 ` - E12" / - 0 ' - r e• n�l" li�� .� \u 7.400sf 36 E42" a s.000sr a F5 e �. _ E [/FN E15° / EXISTING s 6 o .r E i E15' ,, 20,500 sr I� >� y/ STORMCEPTOR / � a e �E15 - �� E48 - \ lal 12" , o E18" V Ate' -E21" � � �� �� ' /co/ —�_ Q `I A EXISTING T�� �` 7 ) (W �' EXISTING BUILDING: �. / / . STORMCEPTOR j Lu` ; I 169,555 SF ` (APPROX.) La Vo\ � Ems' ( � � gz 1 E48" "' �6�\ `��, .,' NORTH LU L1.1 LL w 1 1 E15.. / Z �2 ` j' UZ � O >< 1 / \ ✓ /� O u7 a A9" \ / %/ o oa zoo U > LiJ f- �' 111 E8,� '�'`\ \ rt ".� — 0 co W o _ ' / SCALE FEET O w E48" ' LU U) t \ \� '� / anti+^� /' j LEGEND = > O c g LU �j k EXISTING PRIVATE STORM SEWER a � (n x z `. 1 1 1 `� - ✓° / '/ ,'/ � PROPOSED PRIVATE STORM SEWER EV a` � '�, 1 � \•' �� �, ,' /' n EXISTING X-INCH STORM SEWER Ur a X PROPOSED X-INCH STORM SEWER �Z,/n� CZC w Z PROPERTY LINE (n Y / WATER FEATURE/STORM WATER �J TREATMENT AREA J c 0 Y ! IY/ ` 1 \ / j ,��&�� 'ON-SITE STORM SEWER IS PRIVATE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE Y uJ 0 O p P RUNOFF RATES RATES 2-YR (CFS) 10-YR (CFS) 100-YR (CFS) U J o 111 _ _ i E%ISTING 166.58 249.24 342.64 UU Y i PROPOSED 94.16 140.01 204.93 J O O Z EXISTING N OFF VO 1 09 ME = m z o . CD z 1 PROPOSED 28.51 (Af) DATE 3 ; \ 08/13/2012 L PROJECT NO. Y q 160633001 E E /- SHEET NUMBER E / 05 09 o € D ___. ..1-1- 1-111-- n a.irinournlr\POnnvn Ale r- I?\renn\Phase. ?\FXHIRITS\(1r, - UTILITY-WATER LAYOUT.dwa O6 Auq 13, 2012 2:38pm by amanda.groh rcummt,together with the concepts Intl designs v esented herein.Ia an instrument of service, a intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was P-pared.Reuse of Ind irn0 op reliance this document without written authorizllian and adaptation by Ki 1l 14orn Ind A--igtes,Inc,shall tae without liability to Kimley-Horn Intl Associates,I� XEOES AVENUE NORTH _ -� V k CD . - m- �� y 0 G) ,_ Vv ✓, \ \ \ a m m Zf A� o 71 t0; ,� / �7 Z `\ \ '\ =�'N �t \ 2�� / �•-�� ;Fly m 00 � I ap J� 7 Cf � m • \ � m / Tm cP= i,o r m \ C7 Im p z 2 O� _ O \\ m mvo u f m n m �o �O O = = X X -4 Z Z7 �J X m X Z7 D ;u x O O cn O to m Z 9 m m Q O Z m � O ;0 N N O c- D cn OZ O m o x A < r x D D Z m I Z mp Z O� m TIT m x Z = D A = D S Z D CO A x r m A r Z D D Co D m m Z m Z1 O m Co D r' 3 O m D m x A Z m Z m -0 D C m A x Ln m O m -I m Co n m r m G) m z 0 \ ,T N rn z 0 x TIT ~ o m n -mn v 02 / m i f 'N6-- l U Ila 1 r I p� r i I I III r I \ m� T i N 1 I -- n Ila O =- C O 0 0 z 0 O I O D Cn rn m I � O C, 0 o \o Ila I ; 6> m V m -o X Cm Fn c W z Z p c� G7 W I v Z \� C I \ o ri � z M \ f \al X X ° a �V r -n 11 ui _ m 0) ; °o oi m oz O O �o W D � ' SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN HENNEPIN MINNESOTA PHASE II CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS WATER UTILITY EXHIBIT SHEET 6 OF 11 SCALE DESIGN ENGINEER: WILLIAM D. MATZEK ley-Ham ❑m andksedates,Inc. ©2009 EN E IMHORN AND ASS ST.P IN0 2550 UNINER5ITV AVDJUE NEST.SUITE 2J6N Si.PAUL NN 55114 PHONE:651-6A5-4192 FAX 651-645-5116 www.KIMEEY-NORNC- DESIGNED BY MINNESOTA RECISTRAnON NUMBER: DATE: DRANK BY d CHECKED BY No. REVISIONS DATE )rowing name: K:\TWC—LDEV\GATLIN DEVELOPMENT\BRQOKDALE GENFER\L;AUU\`M0Se Z\LANItJI—\ f —V This document,together with the..­t.and J..i,- ..n t-d herein,oa an instrument of service.i.'.t..d,d only for the specific­p—and OI-t for which A was p-p—d.Reuse f and improper relionce on bin document without written..th.ri—ti..and adaptation by—I­H—­d Associates.Inc,sM1all be without Ii.bility to KiH­H——d A-6.t- )(ep-)"Es AVENUE NORTH M 25 m Ito M C m z P Ila CPO °� (p A\ o p�G N tp '0 10 % Q I C- ip RI < Z rn Ila P, 0 C: z X n m 0 K:> m z L/) > C/)w 0 m q > G-) > C') m z --A 0 90 A., C) 10 CIO M N) M (4 > > 0� cf) 0 (q C/) m m 0 K 9./ M Z m cn > z ------- --I X > m Ila > v A \ �° � / z 10 �rm- cn 1 -0 x m -u -0 x m C �00 ;J0 �u ;u C-) 0 0 0 0 0 0 z -u TO m 0 0 0 �;O L/) C/) Cf) m m C)---i m (f) m > x F- m x C/) Lf) >z -0 2 1 z > > x m Z n Z Z < > C) M =n >m > C U) > U) z z m m 1- > C/") Lo C: m z m m ::E m > m 0 x 2E ZE 70 -, " z > -< m m z z C3 0 70 �u TO 0 0 m m z -q -0 TO 0 CIO 0 z6 M 0 m 70 m > 2L m n m m m \" j 1 C" r- z m > ;R m m m NZ ( SCALE DESIGN ENGINEER! PHASE 11 CONCEPTUAL r]=" Kimley-Hom DESIGNED BY WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6"' DEVELOPMENT PLANS and Asmdates,Inc. "' C, SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING .2 - M 14> MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NU L,0 DRAWN BY @2009 KIIALEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. --4C C�,'N-)I BROOKLYN CENTER, MN SANITARY SEWER EXHIBIT 2550 UNIVERSITY A VE NEST,WITE 2MN ST.PAUL,MN 55114 0, PHONE�651-645-4197–551-60-51le GG 25 CHECKED BY I DATE: —1---N.– So HENNEPIN MINNESOTA SHEET 7 OF 11 No REVISIONS DATE BY G, 0 ---------- u Z - -- -- -------- No 10 COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROA z -B S --------- 0 ---- -- ------------ - ---------------- --------- I -------------------- 5; -———-- —————— D IF • J E E AR -z F, Sz- WTI V� zS 0 PUD BOUNDARY\ > 'G E' /A z- C7 6� t E N PHOTOMETRIC NOTES: o A. CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE BASES WLL BE USED FOR Q Z LIGHT POLE BASE FOUNDATIONS. :� t: POLE BASE DESIGNS SHALL BE PROVIDED 0 ENGINEERING PERMITTING STAGE. 0 ARCH. 4, B. REFER TO PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING I LL -PUD BOUNDARY ELECTRICAL PLAN. ui C) F-- X 0 C. LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE METAL HALIDE. z LU Z w 00 02i (D LIGHT POLE& 0 z 0- LLI LIGHT POLE& 0 FIXTURES W FIXTURES U) LU (D U) 5 FC(FOOT CANDLES) < > 3 FC LU 10 FC(FOOT CAN a- DLE! 5 FC 1 FC 3 FC 1 FC z z 0 Z75 :E w-z Lij :2 0� z E PARKING LOT LIGHTING PEDESTRIAN TRAIL LIGHITNG 0 LIJ 2 z < overall Luminaire schedule Lu • s 0 Qty LLJ 0 Symbol A—ge—t De—iptim LLF L=ens/Lamp Lum. L—s wa�'t-. ui r 12 DISO GFR-540-I000-PSW-F 39- POLE 31 EASE 0.750 --o 173304 12160 Z 1 ROTATED 2 IN 90 39- POLE 31 EASE 0.750 I10000 999I5 0 11 SINGLE GFR-2-1000-PSW-F-3HSS 39- POLE 3- BASE 0.750 120000 45676 Ioso w > 3 0 90...-E. .--5.0-1000-PS--F 19• POLE 31 EASE 0.750 --oo- 259956 3140 (D -�-7-66 129 �.790 g000 SINGLE GB-5-100-�-F 16' POLE < \ 9 v ♦ 3 SINGLE GM-540-I000-PSW-F 391 POLE 3- BASE 0.750 120000 56652 loso T LLM Z z EXISTING LIGHT TO REMAIN U) w T 0 IDO 200 DATE EXISTING LIGHT C)B/1 3/2012 EXISTING LIGHT SCALE FEET PROJECT NO. EXISTING LIGHT 160633001 SHEET NUMBER c E 08 4 I RD COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD ————— — N010 BASS ------------------- M9 tr nnEE G f 11110 EXISTING KOHL'S 6 �s' L E o o o hz� E 7S z cc Z. PUD BOUNDARY(TYP.) 0 z E lz E L EXISTING EXISTING LEGEND E E- BUILDING: WALMART (NOT A- 169,555 SIF E; (APPROX.) IN CONTRACT) EXISTING TREES(TO REMAIN) PUD BOUNDARY(TYP.) e4 A U) < z EXISTING RAIN GARDEN/ STORMWATER AREA W >< LL LLJ o C) z UJ PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE z Lu rn G> 0 2i a- < C) LLJ 0 LU SYMBOL CITY COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT Lij N U) SWAMP WHITE OAK 2"CAL. B&B U) z < z COMMON HACKBERRY 2.5"CAL. B&B = W NEW HORIZON ELM 2.5"CAL. B&B OVERSTORY AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 2.5"CAL. B&B SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST w DECIDUOUS 2.5"CAL. B&B < EXISTING ONT. z z 0 STORMWATER QUAKINGASPEN #20 c U) BIRCH(SINGLE STEM&CLUMP) #20 CONT. u) z z a #20 CONT. IVORY SILK LILAC U) CRABAPPLE #20 CONT. 0 z E V, ORNAMENTAL LL] DECIDUOUS 6'HT B&B z BLACK HILLS SPRUCE �e Lu 6'HT B&B RED PINE W EN C) ' LLJ JUNIPER 6 HT B&B Z EVERGREEN CL VIBURNUM #3 CONT. NORTH __jl 0 DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #3 CONT. (D 0 DOGWOOD #3 CONT. z 0 100 200 z LILAC #3 CONT. 2! Co SCALE FEET SPIREA #3 CONT. DAYLILY #1 CONT. DATE OERSTER #1 CONT. 08/13/2012 KARL T NO. PROJECT EYED SUSAN #1 CONT. 160633001 SHRUB/PERENNIAL E SHEET NUMBER 09 9 1 I I )rowing name: K:\TWC—LDEV\GATLIN DEVELOPMENT\BROOKDALE CENTER\GAUD\FhaSe Z\LAHIUI—\IU — 611— 1-1 L-1 1—y I ...... This d--M,t.R.ih.,with the–­te-d J..i­presented herein,ps an i-tl—t of–vi–b,intended only for the specific P.1p,ll and di-t for which it was­p–d.Re–of and improper reliance an thie document without written..th-i-fl-and adaptation by K-­H–and Assoc isles.Inc,shall be without lidility to KVmJ­H–-d Assoc isles, m 0 5 8 03 m A X % z z -n 51)G)G) -v: V x IL j y r \\ A 'Al A 7?e J N ––––––-–––––– ––– ––––––– ––––– ––– 0 ––––––– C:) C m 0 (A I 0, 2 P 00 > -�'j 12 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, IVIN HENNEPIN MINNESOTA PHASE 11 CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS CIRCULATION EXHIBIT SHEET 10 OF 11 v DESIGN ENGINEER: WILLIAM D. MATZEK MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NUMBER: DATE: EIMFI Klmley-Flom and Associates,Inc. (g)2009 NIMLEY–HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC, 2�UNIVERSITY A�KST.SUITE�14 ST.—,M PHONE:S51-114111– 551-5-51le —IMLEY–H–COM DESIGNED By – — OWA*N By CHECKED By REVISIONS 0 0 BY m G) m 8 W GO > z --j m 0 > G7 i C C: C C) m 0 C m 0 (Z m 0 C m 0 X ON -C z G) C:) C m 0 (A I 0, 2 P 00 > -�'j 12 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, IVIN HENNEPIN MINNESOTA PHASE 11 CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS CIRCULATION EXHIBIT SHEET 10 OF 11 SCALE DESIGN ENGINEER: WILLIAM D. MATZEK MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NUMBER: DATE: EIMFI Klmley-Flom and Associates,Inc. (g)2009 NIMLEY–HORN AND ASSOCIATES,INC, 2�UNIVERSITY A�KST.SUITE�14 ST.—,M PHONE:S51-114111– 551-5-51le —IMLEY–H–COM DESIGNED By – — OWA*N By CHECKED By REVISIONS DATE BY Y ID COUNTY RD NO 10/BASS LAKE RD ---- -------- - -_ REVISED BUILDING - - - ADDED DRIVE-THRU -_- ----- " r AND SIZE INCREASED g - _ - - - - - - - - - z ----® ®------ - - - - - -- -------------------- o 4,800sf \ " r.= - 11 d d B 4005f 14,000sf \ / :8 4 L \\ O ba 112oo9r ---- .` d4 IIIIIIID \\ \ O -111 1 SMALL \ ` \ EXISTING 38,000Sf ,. d q b Lf KOHL'S _---------- _ _ V;m x ` \ < Po O \ \ °'^g REraL \ \ e4 500sr \ © A\ 11,200 \ SMALL RETAIL SHOPS ADDED\ // R N u �� € z.5DDSf _ RETAIL USE CHAFFED // ❑ TO RESTAURANT \\v / a / Q / 7,400Sf 84 6.0DOSf \ E' " O � 20,500 3t - a E E SYMBOL LEGEND: a w PROPERTY LINE ¢¢ Ci O U PROPOSED LIGHT POLE(SEE LIGHTING %m F� ♦ PLAN FOR FIXTURE LEGEND) I I EXISTING ---- PUD BOUNDARY Z BUILDING: \�/ / /) / WATER FEATURE/STORMWATER J Q " 169,555 SF \\ \\ Walmart/'� / // I // TREATMENT AREA if Z (APPROX.) PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED PATIO AREA € 1 v a a LLI Vr- I- D_ O U Z O / : <,O�C1� O M MONUMENT SIGN O Z W 5 , �� P PYLON SIGN W J O_ 2 y�0 FP FREEWAY PYLON SIGN w (\n U) PUO LIMITS OF REVISIONS TO PREVIOUS = /W UJ ul tn r £ eo /� a SITE DATA TABLE Z Z °G W \ ✓ , / ,' GO BUILDING DESIGNATION LOT AREA BUILDING PARKING PROADED RATIO Z a 1 /POTENTIAL SEPARATION - / / / / EXISTING BUILDING LOTI,BLOCKI I4AD ACRES 169,55550.FT. 783 SPACES e50 Z •A LOT S.BLOCK I 0.70 ACRES 8,100 30.FT. "SPACES 4.76 / \ /j •^B LOT 2,BLOCK 1 1.45 ACRES 8.500 SO FT 105 SPACES 12 O .35 �/ •-C LOT d,BLOCK 1 0.85 ACRES 2,485 SO.FT 27 SPACES 10.85 LL W EXISTING // //// ••D LOTI,BU3CK1 t00 ACRES 8,400 SO.FT. 51 SPACES 6.07 U Z STORMWATER / -E LOT 2,BLOCK 0.94 ACRES 4,800$O.FT. "SPACES low � \ •F LOT I,BLOK2 85PACE5 tt � 1 T ui o r / VVV 1. 'G LOT II,BLOCK 1.44ACRES 8,42030.FT 57 SPACES 6.77 11' w X LVJ y. \\ /�/ -H LOT 5,BLOCKI 1.25 ACRES 11,200 SO.Fr. 54 SPACES 4.82 aN• Z LOT 3,BLOCK 1 3.09 ACRES 38.000 SO FT. 187 SPACES 4.92 U • p n 'K LOT 10,BLOCK I 1.19 ACRES 9,500 30 FT "SPACES d.14 J o J /^, � �v �dn \ //// •L LOT 14,BLOCK 1 1.19 ACRES 11,200 SO Fr.. 59 SPACES 5.27 LH v WO Y" •M LOT 15,BLOCK 1 1.16 ACRES 7,500 SO.FT SO SPACES 1067 O 2 \ / ••N LOT 1,BLOCK 2 2.48 ACRES 20,500 SO.FT. 93 SPACES 4.54 fi F v "O LOT 2,BLOCK 2 0.75 ACRES 7,50)SO.FT. 41 SPACES 5.47 0 d 0.99 LOT 3,BLOCK2 ACRES 6,000 SO.FT. SS SPACES 11.00 �16� LJ 41,> o - � "8 LOT I,BLOCK2 - 7,100 SO.FT. 34 SPACES 4.59 2 W LJ r u `\ \ NORTH -POTENRALPUBUC OUTLOTB 1.35 ACRES - 3 �� _ TOTAL 35.63 ACRES 3",3G330.FT. 1813 SPACES 5.28 DATE SEE SHINGLECREEK CROSSING FINALPLAT 08/13/2012 Y \ 0 100 200 µ SEE SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING-2ND ADDITION PROJECT NO. r� ' hf LOTS TO BE REPLATTED AS PART OF SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING-3RD ADDITION 160633001 E FEET SCALE y SHEET NUMBER o € MEMORANDUM DATE: September 7, 2012 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Bruce Johnson, Engineering Technician Supervisor Steven L. Lillehaug, City Engineer/Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Public Works Review of Preliminary Plat Review SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 2ND ADDITION Public Works Department staff reviewed the Preliminary Plan (Site Plan and Preliminary Plat) submittals dated August 18, 2012, for the proposed SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 2ND ADDITION pertaining to sites D, E, O, and Q and provide the following recommendations, comments and conditions: General: 1. All recommendations and requirements approved as part of previous actions pertaining to all prior PUD/PUD amendment approvals,Preliminary Plan approvals and Final Plat approvals relative to this development and/or portions thereof are withstanding and must be incorporated into the final plans. 2. The following comments are contingent upon final plat approval, and final site plan and land alterationibuilding permit submittal and approval for Phase 2 of the Shingle Creek Crossing development. Additionally, this review only includes a review of the revisions contained within sites D, E, O, and Q. Other site revisions are apparent on the drawings outside of these sites, are inconsistent with the previously approved PUD and amendments, and have not been included as part of this review. 3. Replatting and terminating certain easements are required as part of this redevelopment. The formal vacation document must contain an easement vacation description and depiction exhibit signed by a professional surveyor. 4. An updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Engineer and City Attorney for review at the time of the preliminary plat application (within 30 days of preliminary plat application). Additionally,this will need to stay current and be updated through the approval process as required to maintain and be current within 30 days of release of the final plat. 5. The applicant is responsible for coordinating site development plans with Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, Qwest Communications and other private utility companies. Any further easements necessary to provide utility service to the proposed site development shall be dedicated to the public for public use with the final plat. 6. This development is required to be reviewed by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission. All City and Watershed storm drainage,treatment and infiltration standards are required to be met. 7. Upon project completion,the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures, and provide certified record Preliminary Plat Review Memo—Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition Page 2 September 7, 2012 drawings for any associated private and/or public improvements prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 8. Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer's design/project engineer. Upon project completion, the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer's immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the state of Minnesota and must certify all required as- built drawings. Preliminary Plat: 9. The following item(s) are required Preliminary Plan items that have not been provided and/or included with the application and drawings as required by Platting Ordinance 15- 104 and likewise have not been evaluated as required: a. Show proper dimensioning of drive aisles, parking stalls, curve radii, and other typical site plan dimensioning. 10. Revise plat to eliminate irregular short and skew lot lines where feasible. 11. Site G lot line was revised with the Phase 2 PUD amendment. Verify and update final property line between lots G and D for consistency. 12. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City of Brooklyn Center's standard specifications and details. The City's standard details must be included in the plans. 13. All curb and gutter must be concrete B6-12 curb and gutter. 14. Eliminate Outlot B as shown in the proposed PUD drawings. Outlot B property area should remain consistent with the originally approved plat for Shingle Creek Crossing and remain attached to the adjacent parcels. Plans should be updated to likewise include this area as being integrated and well designed with these adjacent lots. 15. Provide trash enclosure area details and locations for proposed PUD amendment sites O and Q. 16.No portion of building or appurtenant structures may encroach on the City drainage and utility easement. 17. Provide an updated major access routes exhibit for the entire development that includes defined truck routes to all sites (proposed and existing), and all loading dock areas (proposed and existing including Sears). All major routes that include truck traffic must be designed with a heavy duty pavement section. 18. Provide detailed vehicle turning and tracking movement diagrams for delivery vehicles and garbage trucks for all revised sites demonstrating specific and actual routes. 19. The loading dock and truck turning/backing areas for site S/N must be fully separated from public customer parking areas on site Q and must not direct or invite public parking ingress/egress routes through loading dock and turning/backing areas. Final access routes and turning movements for all loading dock areas will be subject to final City review and approval conditions of the Preliminary Plan and Final Plat. Final Plat: Preliminary Plat Review Memo—Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition Page 3 September 7, 2012 20. Provide a working drawing of the final plat with all proposed easements that includes an overlay of all ponds,retaining walls, all utilities (private and public, proposed and existing) and grading elevations for the City to use to verify adequacy.The drainage easements must encompass the ponds, overflow areas, and channels at or above the determined individual 100-yr flood elevations for those elements and areas. Prior to Issuance of Land Alteration and Building Permits: 21. Submit a recorded copy of the restrictive covenants(subdivision agreement). 22. Submit final site plans and specifications for review and approval by the City Engineer in form and format as determined by the City. The final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan. 23. Submit a letter of credit or cash escrow for the land disturbance portion of the project in the amount of 125%of the estimated cost(estimate provided by the developer)and/or in the amount determined by City staff to comply with the land alteration permit,private site improvements and to restore the site. 24.A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions,traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions,tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility provisions,temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non- compliance provisions.The plan must be in a City approved format and must outline minimum site management practices and penalties for non-compliance. 25. Submit a$5,000 separate cash escrow for the construction management plan elements as part of the non-compliance provision. This escrow must be accompanied by the agreement and signed by the developer and property owner.Through this document,the developer and property owner will acknowledge: a. The property will be brought into compliance within 24 hours of notification of a violation of the construction management plan,other conditions of approval or City code standards. b. If compliance is not achieved, the City will use any or all of the escrow dollars to correct any deficiency and/or issue. 26. Submit a$5,000 cash escrow for the costs associates with City performing inspections and SWPPP reviews. 27. Schedule and hold a preconstruction meeting with the City staff. All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. The Preliminary Plan(Site Plan and Preliminary Plat) and Final Plat must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions above. Subsequent approval of the Final Plat may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading, geometric design and other design elements as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-21 RESOLUTION REGARDING RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-011 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK (FOR GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2012-011 submitted by Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company, requesting aproval of a Preliminary Plat of a new subdivision to be titled SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 2° ADDITION, which is a replat of 6 lots generally located inside the new Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development project site, (Subject Site); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on September 13, 2012, whereby this item was given due consideration, a staff report was presented, and a public hearing was opened to allow for public testimony regarding the preliminary plat of SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 2nd ADDITION, which were received and noted for the record; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined during its review of the preliminary plat materials submitted with Planning Application No. 2012-011, that said plat is in general conformance with City of Brooklyn Center's City Code Chapter 15 —Platting; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2012-011 as submitted by Loren Van Der Slik, on behalf of Gatlin Development Company requesting Preliminary Plat consideration of a new subdivision to be titled SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 2nd ADDITION,be approved based upon the following conditions: 1. All recommendations and conditions as noted in the City Engineer's review memorandum, dated September 7, 2012 shall be complied with or completed as part of any final plat approvals. 2. Any easements that need to be vacated under this platting process as determined by the City Engineer, must be considered under separate and formal City easement vacation process, with all documentations, descriptions, and exhibits singed by a licensed surveyor. 3. The final plat shall be subject to review and final approvals by the City Engineer,prior to release by the City for recording purposes. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-21 4. The final plat shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 5. An updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Attorney and City Engineer for review at the time of the final plat application(within 30 days of release of the final plat). September 13 2012 Chair Date ATTEST: Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Chair , Commissioners and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 13 14 15 16 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 1 28 29 1 30 1 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ° m A 13 ° ° __ ... D 1 I „ Sze I E sELtwt•c •�` '&.,.5� ■ r %�`°k f ,1 �11` rye ce ¢ i E SRC.Ma,',e•sr DEVELOPERIOWNER 3 \ ti� t1 s'zD- .19 BLOCKI �C 'X� '� GATLIN DEVELOPMENT CO.,INC. A}Tfi'Y n '/ + 1 yy L \i ro:•F �„ e9 1r 888 E.OLAS BLVD.SUITE 600 F b I' -i \� .o., \15 Y(, 1 - \ _ \ 1 _ � --7 FORT LAUDE 3D LE,FL 33301 EIISTIN� p s \ KOHL'ji CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER z G dD +� _ � ^: ,'yrd'�a.� 5s 9 w>9 � \ ���: aNA r-szr 6&'.'J9 9 prro i zry,- P� n T�..m t f�y �•�/ sq 0} ' E t� /' ' Cl STEVE UL EHAUG.CPE. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Six, S 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY- N BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 554317 A ° ` /8 u!/ R alit __ _ ed r>` �'r�E rr J ^1�,. Y 1 .'�j'} ]6ER&P3340 N q H E ni f, 'E, _ � V� \ '¢ 's/zo a+arvnTP ��I D�Rmr�cx� Y q�s$ ° ss•Su - V - - P ^v'D ^'f DR� _ a uTlun "-< unUrY EnsEM R .-/i - / ENGINEER D PREPAT ER S p$e 77CC11J� ,j� ^° -''' Ulttl - 1� EASEMwT \ m "� J �j'S1y KIMLE55MORN AND ASSOCIATES.INC. M Y! '� Jg >R sJi`&TI \ J V• F\ }`" '`✓ /qb 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W y J E UODTYRE M yoo l^ \ in'�. �` -`� SJIIY` \\) ,� y� p 2'. �� ��''/� J1 SUITE 23BN ❑ A€ 1 j/ +•�2" '/. ST.PAUL.6 51-645-4197 1 -200Ys 4 CONTACT: TZEK,P.E. SURVEYOR " 3 K r 1., alt, ,%61 &w3�Qc ��v �, �rtfi=' -- ';-�= ;'� _• ( ) ,� !/! �l\�� \\\. I \ '4,,,� T 9001 EAST BDLOOMINGTDNRFREEWAY 35W ❑ A vFN...��_ Yi 1r ` ' �___ �G k I �.:' O■ I Y SUITE 118 �7 /t BLOOMINGTON,MN 55420-3435 4 0 �s Jas! lr C LOT 1 H 952-888-9526 a �`A \ _ ty BLO CONTACT.CK2 R \ .L T. MARK HANSON,PIES a 23 ti �\ �£K 791014 ao.S \ \Q 10'DRAINAGE T\I .\ [l Y G 51 +n t) Y O d D EXISTING EASEMENT ` '� N z g 4 BUILDING v 169555 ,.l SF (APPROX) P j NORTH LEGEND S m \ X A, \ 1_ •`\\ ) • MONUMENTa�3 J P, / w Q 1�. Y I SECTION LINE Frc � 3M E 11+G+ y , /�' N$ - `'\\` \i, � C'qP/�T 0 150 3DO ---- -- EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ' KALE?.UlIUtt \j S +10`$ \ \T \ /. -/` {' f Rw ypD� - PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE m S vNNi R r �A T�ET`' �� 61 \ {,4 ,. �j i ��IM ! SCALE FEET ---�--- EXISTING ROW LINE O E / �'\ / .fie 01 LDING/✓Y Ir!'..�IX'i --- PROPOSED SETBACK LINE o f!`I o V U E - f TTi t` 1 T •y,U / _�, P� ------ EXISTING EASEMENT LINE �1 (�i�}\ Cil,� b �,'d/�• 'r\6t' ------ PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE Z r I to Q T ' \I .0 4 \ ,' \� ( y�?`,YF' `l. �,� i .1�J I - --- - FLOOD PLAIN y(, V Ir,�Ly` s 1 \ �'j. \ /\�i\x\°'° Ar ' F : .l I WETLAND 1 GI � 1�= - � IN CROSSING ICJ BUILDING � U 0 4! � Y '� ''� � �\?� •� SH •--------------' EXISTING CURB LINE - GLE CREEK C LAiMwT 2ND ADDITION iREELINENE aV \ `t" . `S Y ,�' - SANITARY SEWER LINE } ° _ UTILITY PRELIMINARY PLAT w EASEMwT /" SECTION 2-T118N-R21W WATER LINE LL a �='- \ '` >--•-- STORM SEWER LINE LL Z "' ` _ BROOKLYN CENTER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA = = OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE �' U Q 1 7; \` R�/� �� / -un•- UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE X Z J / GAS LINE O n � n . ` , , /Ywy +''%f mr-1c- UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINE , Y ! %Y 1' d CURRENTZONING - coNTOUps �/ / / _® SANITARY MANHOLE W 2 N X �O SANITARY LIFT STATION Ix U) III Z Z s / / 7 d R - BUILDING DESIGNATION LOTAREA BUILDING PARKINGPROADED RAM A.r` �� �/ ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 0 HYDRANT \ FINAL PLAT DESCRIPTION N D LOT I,BLOL1(1 o..Acws e,4aosnFT. 515PACE3 e.OT .'\�� r -` z+r__ , ia GOPHER STATE CALL ONE - WATER VALUE E LOT 2.BLOIX1 0.91 ACRES 4.000 SQ Ff. it;sp; s tom ` \\v: i�`i` / ;l,ii \ - MN TOLL FREE 1-600-252-1166 Shilpe pe,k Gw,Fq 2na Addition AA \\\"` ;- / / 0 WATERMAIN MANHOLE o _ N LW 1,IUOatz zAIN-Wit M.60"SO.Pr. 9a SPACES a.54 .� ,. ' BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS FQ- r o LOT Z.eLOCKZ 0.T5ACRES T.sIDsa" 41 SPACES SAT y\\`�'- �':,f` TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 EXISTING PLAT DESCRIPTION ® STORM SEWER MANHOLE w N O LOT 3.OLOCK2 0.99 ACRES e."SQ Ff. 6e3PACES 11A0 '``` " %� o PROJECT LOCATION D - S LDT I,eLOCKO - T.I903Q FT. 345PACE3 0.59 / Outlot A and Lot,2.3.5.8,7.B,9.13.15.and 17. m® STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN l Z BE " POIENIIRL PUBIIC AREA OUTLOTB 1.35 ACRES - e;` `\ /'' Block 1.dl M ShMgle Oe1k C1wailq,Hennpin County. L w ° TOTAL TAeAWFS 54,000SQFT. 3333PAr><3 0.10 1 Minnesota ROOF DRAIN Z ? Y"�� ( `WfT U G �+q M OO LYN D FLARED END SECTION IQ CG E 1 G 01 pt �I O E N E pP RIP RAP O w2F V`S�,' L L LIGHT POLE of Z o J Mc Y V` `� ® GAS METER Y Y DD `/'' I, g © $ °p+ GAS VALVE m /'' L-----------� © i4wY pcV wauslcW w. W O W EE b Arrt a Q N 0 ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER W O k Y ,(1, m ELECTRIC MANHOLE N 2 STa Ay y `tY'\ �3) ELECTRIC HH U LmL 0 �+ i BUROUE LA S 00. ELECTRIC BOX W Z w b f � B MONITORING WELL J U O E OR v = TRAFFIC LIGHT Z COMMUNICATION d! GG(; San iN�. ° - uL MANHOLE T d U ° m i.NU Ay O` s� Hrrt i g4q i A10 1S COMMUNICATION BOX ^ Z w 5Sa fL IIIAC�N 0I s1 cT' CABLE TV BOX V I = HH I BENCHMARKS t,araa,l 33 a AML K s>a HB v E p c (Booed on 1929 Dalum) i0 _ y - SIGN DATE 3 s 1.)Top of top nut of fire hydrant;wSet.Ida of Xerxes Aw pt the southwest comer of the Site. I(E u n4.v E w, z J Ali i z k BOLLARD 06/13/2012 / II r Elevalim=853.13 feet Me YI Y 2.)Top of bdt;n r Best side of transmission to-,2nd tower scat of Xerxes Aw. pAK 3y. i i ��% VEGETATION PROJECT N0. Elewtlon.851.40 feet 8' Y 160633D01 E 3J Top of WE;northeast Side of tr-MiWw tower,nonhweet of pedestrion bridge. I N n SHEET NUMBER Elawtion-841 feel JJ E 4,Top of too wut of(IN,hydro,(;,a d.asl oerner of the Site. VICINITY MAP El-lion-851.58 feet NOT TO SCALE 1 of 1 o` €