HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 09-27 PCP 3 rof i TER
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
SEPTEMBER 27,2012
STUDY SESSION
1. Call to Order: 7:00 PM
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes— September 13, 2012 Regular Session
4. Chairperson's Explanation
The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to
hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes
recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these
matters.
5. Presentations—None
6. Planning Application Items (with public hearing)—None
7. Planning Application Items without public hearing) -None
8. Discussion Items
a) Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study Area — Land Use Opportunity Sites and Areas
(continuation from the Sept. 13, 2012 Regular Meeting)
b) Architectural Guidelines and Standards for the Commercial and Industrial Districts
9. Adjournment
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
SEPTEMBER 13, 2012
CALL TO ORDER
The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Rahn at 7:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chair Sean Rahn, Commissioners Kara Kuykendall, Carlos Morgan, Michael Parks, and Stephen
Schonning were present. Also present were Councilmember Carol Kleven, Planning Commission
Secretary Tim Benetti, Director of Business & Development Gary Eitel, and Planning
Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Scott Burfeind and Stan Leino were absent
and excused.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES —AUGUST 16, 2012
There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to
approve the minutes of the August 16, 2012 meeting as submitted. The motion passed.
CHAIR'S EXPLANATION
Chair Rahn explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the
Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings,
the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final
decisions in these matters.
PRESENTATION—BROOKLYN BOULEVARD STUDY UPDATE
Mr. Steve Lillehaug, City Engineer, provided a presentation of the Executive Summary of the
Brooklyn Boulevard Study. He stated that he would like to step thru the progress being made on
the Brooklyn Boulevard Study that is being done in cooperation with Hennepin County, MnDot
and Three Rivers Park District.
Mr. Lillehaug explained the goal is to revitalize the corridor improving transportation functions
of the road in an appealing and safe manner to create a more pedestrian friendly environment and
to also spur redevelopment. Mr. Lillehaug reviewed existing conditions along Brooklyn
Boulevard especially the existing non-compatible uses such as single family homes. He added
this study will set the ground work to establish funding once a specific plan is in place since no
funding is currently identified.
I
Commissioner Morgan arrived at 7:15 p.m.
Mr. Lillehaug reviewed some areas along Brooklyn Boulevard that need improvements and
noted recommended strategies and concepts that will be looked at throughout the study to allow
the vision and improvements to occur that will improve safety along the corridor and eliminate
direct access onto Brooklyn Boulevard.
Page 1
9-13-12
Chair Rahn asked about the implementation of the plan and cost estimates for the project.
Mr. Lillehaug replied that implementation will first be for manageable projects and the 1" phase
will be at Hwy 100 and Brooklyn Blvd since MnDot will be redecking the bridge in 2014. That
project will be what sets the tone for the next phase. He added that from a safety standpoint, the
area along Brooklyn Boulevard and 50`h Avenue near Malmborg's could be the next phase since
it is a high accident intersection. However, each phase of the project will be dependent on
funding and partnership with others.
Commissioner Parks asked if roundabouts have been considered for the corridor. Mr. Lillehaug
responded that he is an advocate of single lane roundabouts, however; only multi-lane
roundabouts could be utilized along Brooklyn Boulevard. He added they have been discussed;
however, controlled intersections seem to be a better solution in this corridor area with the
possibility of a roundabout north of Hwy 100.
APPLICATION NO. 2012-019 LOREN VAN DER SLIK/GATLIN DEVELOPMENT
Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-019, consideration of a Planned Unit Development
proposing Amendment No. 3 to the previously approved 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit
Development. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 9-13-12 for Application No.
2012-019.)
Mr. Benetti explained the requested amendments consist of:
• Replatting of Lots 12 and 13 into two new lots (Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Shingle Creek
Crossing 2❑d Addition) and which includes the revising original Building Site D from a
6,175 sq. ft. retail building to a new 8,400 sq. ft. building for mixed retail services and
restaurant use with a drive thru service window and lane.
• Replatting of Lots 15, 16 and 17 into four reconfigured lots (Outlot B, Lots 1, 2 and 3,
Block 2, Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition) and which includes replacing original
Building Site Q (35,660 sq. ft. junior box retail store) with two new mixed
retail/restaurant pad sites (new O and Q pad sites).
• The creation of a new Outlot B for future Shingle Creek day lighting features.
Mr. Benetti further described how the proposed amendments would affect the development on
the site. He stated that since this new Outlot was specifically created to accommodate additional
Shingle Creek day-lighting and since it will not be done this year, Staff suggested this specific
amendment item be denied, and the proposed outlot area incorporated into the adjacent
(proposed) Lots 2 and 3 of this proposed Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition plat. He added
staff does support the concept in allowing additional day-lighting of Shingle Creek in this same
"open area" in the future which can be done by placing a drainage and utility easement over
these lots. He added this revision will be addressed under the Planning Application No. 2012-
011,the request for Preliminary Plat of Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition.
Page 2
9-13-12
Mr. Benetti reviewed issues brought forward at the last Commission meeting regarding `eating
establishments' with drive-up windows and stated that convenience food restaurants with drive-
up windows are allowed by a special use permit under the C-2 (Commerce) district provided
they do not abut R1, R2, or R3 zoned properties.
Chair Rahn asked for clarification on the denial of Outlot B for future daylighting.
Mr. Benetti responded that with the costs involved with the daylighting, this allows a building to
stay where it is at and as the site starts to expand that they could use TIF dollars to benefit this
area to complete the daylighting features.
Mr. Eitel added Building Q is a restaurant pad and the pond will be built soon and with the
economic energy generated by this project, funds will become available to pay for the
daylighting.
PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-019
There was a motion by Commissioner Parks, seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to open
the public hearing on Application No. 2012-019, at p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
Chair Rahn called for comments from the public. No one came forward for the public hearing.
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
There was a motion by Commissioner Parks , seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to close
the public hearing on Application No. 2012-019. The motion passed unanimously.
The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners.
Commissioner Parks stated that he is not in favor of Buildings G, D and E and feels it is a very
suburban look and does not encourage pedestrian traffic with the layout of parking. He added it
is good for now but not for the future. He envisions businesses coming for a few years and then
leaving empty buildings. He added he feels we could have done better with the site.
Commissioner Schonning stated he traveled through the site today on a road that is a one way
and there was a lot of traffic to the Wal-Mart site. He feels there will be a lot of traffic into this
site which should be good for future businesses.
Commissioner Parks restated how important he feels the view and access from Hwy 100 is to the
success of this site. He also stated his direct concern is once someone is on the site, how does a
pedestrian get through the site if there is a fence around the site. Mr. Eitel responded that there
will be a fence along County Road 10 that will encourage pedestrians to enter the site at the
intersections and not cross over from County Road 10 to the site through the parking lot. He
added there is over a mile of interior walkways on the site for pedestrians to navigate.
Page 3
9-13-12
Commissioner Parks stated he feels the fence will keep people off the site rather than encourage
them to enter the site since the fence is located in a way that redirects them away from the site.
Mr. Eitel responded that the walkways are located to connect to the trailways and are designed to
encourage pedestrian safety.
Mr. Parks stated again that he feels there should not be a fence around the site but rather
walkways that direct pedestrians directly to the site.
ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
NO. 2012-18 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-020, SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER
SLIK/GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
AMENDMENT (NUMBER 3) TO THE 2011 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PUD
There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Chair Rahn, to approve Planning
Commission Resolution No. 2012-20.
There was continued discussion among the Commission regarding voting on approval or denial
of the application. Chair Rahn stated if it is the Commission's decision to deny the resolution,
they need to state their reasoning or basis for denial.
Commissioner Parks stated he objects to the decrease in the number of parking spaces on the site
with the increase to the building size; he feels the plans does not provide adequate pedestrian
access with the fence around the site; and he would like the building sites to have more green
space.
Commissioner Kuykendall stated she is not comfortable with additional drive-thru's on this site
and feels the city has adequate number of them already. She would be more comfortable with a
more specific plan for the building before allowing a drive thru. She added if the plan were
modified to approve without lot B, she would vote positively.
Commissioner Kuykendall made a friendly amendment to the motion on the floor to remove the
drive thru window in Building D.
Commissioner Schonning and Chair Rahn accepted the friendly amendment.
Commissioner Parks requested a second friendly amendment that a recommendation be added to
move the pedestrian walkways and increase the green space for Buildings D and E.
Commissioner Schonning stated he would not accept the motion because it is too vague to vote
on and in looking at the green space he feels green space has been added.
Commissioner Parks clarified his amendment requesting the Developer will improve pedestrian
access from Bass Lake Road (County Road 10), which would be reviewed as part of the final site
plan process.
Page 4
9-13-12
Commissioner Schonning, Kuykendall and Chair Rahn accepted the second friendly amendment.
Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Kuykendall, Morgan, Parks and Schonning
And the following voted against the same: None
The motion passed unanimously.
The Council will consider the application at its September 24, 2012 meeting. The applicant
must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission
will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration.
APPLICATION NO. 2012-011 LOREN VAN DER SLIK/GATLIN DEVELOPMENT
Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-011, consideration of proposed Preliminary Plat of
SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 2ND ADDITION, located in the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD
properties. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 9-13-12 for Application No.
2012-011.)
Mr. Benetti explained the final plat for Shingle Creek Crossing was approved on May 23, 2011.
Under this 2"d Addition,the Applicant is requesting to modify or add the following changes:
• Replat Lots 12 and 13, Shingle Creek Crossing into two new lots, Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,
Shingle Creek Crossing 2"d Addition.
• Replat Lots 15, 16 and 17 of Shingle Creek Crossing into four reconfigured lots, to be
known as Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2, Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition.
• Platting of a new Outlot B, Shingle Creek Crossing 2"d Addition.
He added replatting is necessary to accommodate individual parking needs for each reconfigured
building pad sites.
PUBLIC HEARING—APPLICATION NO. 2012-011
There was a motion by Commissioner Parks , seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to open
the public hearing on Application No. 2012-011, at 9:17p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
Chair Rahn called for comments from the public.
No one came forward for the public hearing on Application No. 2012-011.
CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
There was a motion by Commissioner Parks , seconded by Commissioner Kuykendall, to close
the public hearing on Application No. 2012-011. The motion passed unanimously.
The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners.
The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application
Page 5
9-13-12
ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
NO. 2012-21 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-011, SUBMITTED LOREN VAN DER SLIK (FOR
GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY) A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 2ND ADDITION
There was a motion by Commissioner Kuykendall, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to approve
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-21.
Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Kuykendall, Morgan, Parks and Schonning
And the following voted against the same: None
The motion passed unanimously.
The Council will consider the application at its September 24, 2012 meeting. The applicant must
be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will
require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration.
DISCUSSION ITEM - UPDATE ON REVISED SITE PLAN FOR SLIM'S PIZZA
Mr. Benetti provided an updated site plan for Slim's Pizza (6901 Brooklyn Boulevard) which
was brought to the Commission a few weeks ago. He stated that Staff has been working with the
applicant to realign their site plan and they are prepared to bring this new layout before Council.
It was the unanimous consensus of the Planning Commission members that this was a better plan
and meets their approval.
DISCUSSION ITEM — BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR LAND USE ISSUES AND
OPPORTUNITY AREAS
Staff asked the remaining Commissioners if they wished to continue the discussion of the
Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor land use issues and identification of certain "opportunity areas",
which were introduced previously after Mr. Lillehaug's presentation of the Brooklyn Boulevard
Corridor Study update.
Chair Rahn stated he would prefer to have a majority or full Commission in attendance and
recommended City Staff defer the presentation and discussion to a future meeting date.
The remaining Commissioners concurred.
There were no other discussion items.
Page 6
9-13-12
OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to adjourn
the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at
9:40 p.m.
Chair
Recorded and transcribed by:
Rebecca Crass
Page 7
9-13-12
City of Business and Development
Xprooldyn Center— wwDepartment
w.cityofbrooklyncenter.org
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway,Brooklyn Center,Minnesota 55430-2199
Phone 763.569.3300 TTY/Voice 711 Fax 763.569.3494
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chair Sean Rahn and Planning Commissioners
FROM: Gary Eitel, Business &Development Director
Tim Benetti, Planning & Zoning Specialist
DATE: September 21, 2012
RE: Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study Area — Land Use Opportunity Sites and Areas
(continuation from the Sept. 13, 2012 Regular Meeting)
Planning Commission Agenda—Discussion Item
As a continuation of the same topic and presentation made at the September 13`" meeting, Staff is
presenting for discussion a number of land use issues that we have identified for further study.
These issues include roadway layouts and preferences, along with potential opportunity areas
(redevelopment sites) due to the proposed acquisition and/or reconfiguration of certain properties
throughout this corridor. Most of these opportunity areas will be created by eliminating a
number of single-family uses along this corridor, primarily due to the City/County desire of
removing conflicting access points (driveways) onto Brooklyn Boulevard. Some of these
opportunity areas may also involve amending land use categories and rezoning for planned or
specific uses.
The main central segment of this corridor, where a majority of the roadways changes are
expected to take place, ranges in overall (ROW) widths between 84-ft. to 100-ft. in areas. The
Study has identified this same area to incorporate a new standard overall width of 109 feet. This
new design includes two lanes of travel (both directions); left-hand turn lanes; center medians;
10-foot boulevard/green-strips; a 10-ft. wide trail and 6-ft. sidewalk on either side of the
roadway; completed by 2-ft. "clear-zones"off the back-edge of the trails and walkways.
Due to the unknown and potential limitedness of future funds available to assist in these corridor
improvements, the City may be "ham-strung" in certain places where redevelopment may take
place. Although this Corridor serves as an important commercial/retail corridor base for the
community, the likelihood of replacing these residential areas with commercial, retail or office
uses may be limited or unlikely due to the availability of space, especially for on-site parking
needs. However, small scale (i.e. 2 to 2.5 story) multi-family or senior residential care facilities
may be ideal given the limitedness of redevelopment space once these areas are cleared or final
right-of-way limits have been determined.
Staff will have available for the Commissions' review an example of a redevelopment plan that
illustrates a typical or functional multi-family layout in these areas.
Please note there is no official action to be taken or public hearing scheduled for this study
session item. If you have any questions or comments prior to the meeting, feel free to call Gary
at (763) 569-3305 / email GEitel(j&i.brook]yn-center.mn.us or Tim at (763) 569-3319 /
'TBenetti!cr�ci.brookl�rn-center.mn.us).
Also, please let Rebecca or Tim know if you are unable to attend or need to miss next
Thursday night's meeting. Thank you.
BROOKLYN BOULEVARD
STUDY INFORMATION
VAR. R/W
i
CL S.B. BROOKLYN BLVD CLN.B. BROOKLYN BLVD
44.0'
6.0' 1 01- 14.0' 12.0' 10.0' 1 10.0' 12.0' 14.0' -B' 6.0'
WALK BLVD THRU THRU LEFT TUfRN LEFT TLRN THRU THRU BLVD WALK
I
i
I
2.0%_ VAR. -2.0% 0% VAR. 2.07.
��CIG8624 C40
BROOKLYN BLVD (EXISTING)
BASS LAKE RD - 65TH AVE
109.0' R/w
S.B. BROOKLYN BLVD rtN.B. BROOKLYN BLVD
43.0'
2.0' 10.0' 10.0' 13.0' 11.0' 1 12.0' 8.0' 12.0' 13.0' 10.0' 6.0' 2.0'
i TRAIL BLVD THRU THRU LT. TURN WED. THRU THRU BLVD WALK
j.0% VAR. 2.0% 2.OY. VAR. 2.OY.
8624 C6G B612 C6G 6612 C4G B624 C&G
BROOKLYN BLVD
I
59TH AVE - 65TH AVE
BROOKLYN BOULEVARD
STUDY INFORMATION
SEE INSET B FOR ALTERNATIVE
TPA i
" ----� a,
TWIN LAKES REGIO� :fiL i --
_-,
J
STARBUCKS
i
INSET B
- ... ' CJMPLE
N _
\ A
REVISE 55TH AVE/OSSEO RD FOR SEPAR '
_ ..`
BROOKLYN BLVD/55TH AVE INTERSECTIONrT nti Fl, . a
BROOKLYN BOULEVARD
STUDY INFORMATION
! f li !
" k
I�
ON
HEA TZ.,O I�
1 ' 104 .... HIEP TDELI
BBQ 6 DELI 9
t) �T7fI If j
EVANS, " - AL t
NORDBY +"r, BP GS ( Y CHIROPRACTIC
IT HOSAZY
LC:I_k. SSLAM[C CENTER ±.
fi
V} !tea
BEARD AVE r > ^*��... cost I Q
i
{ APARTLIENTS - �"'. !
X
lam' J`
SRO Ir •. � r� �"
AVE .;t y' / ►. aa%
y
51ST AVE - TH 100
�x
AL
Y
or.�, -
F�GURAT OND F F§EEMAY
,fff II pwvttnncc '
+( ` "" ✓� X ON 0 BR lYNLVD
To
BY F UR STUD,
,c
BROOKLYN BOULEVARD
STUDY INFORMATION
Proposed Admiral Lane Roadway Realignment
PaOf ESSJDNAL NO
BUILD GLDRY CHURCH Q e
OF
FAAG
pll-ft 7-7
LNG1 `
4
` .. �f � \\_J _•—`` ir: NORLE CAS
" i ,4 '�''••^,'! �R. y4 IRTC ME
Ar
LOGISMap Output Page
T ' 3 N
Northport Park,
�y NORTHPORT CSR I' 175
« t
I
101,378-sf 2.3 "
730-ft. of frontage
k - =
AW
�. t
3601 - - _ m
5401
36Og , •,�
•
#/�cmaf w•s•iA t11S t r..'3r:C1=QGlU U.�_ _.,-I.., �' �� ���®. i ni ,
http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=bc_logismap_ovsde&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True&Encode=False[9/13/2012 10:51:22 AM]
H
ar
t� 250 sf (160'
(200' x 50')
Q ..
r
r"`ice
y ;
-a
to
22p,
ira
EVANS
�NORDBY + n�,.. BP GAS
�► . : .. STATION
At
LOGISMap Output Page
22� � fie�2 '66'3 4ri'2 22�—`..22
66Gr 54!16 `"O7 5v=6 560? 66.6 66ar 66LK 6601
•t2 422n 42'8 n2'.2 42iifi d2CfJ 4"0 3YI.70 SP?3 sr5n 3660 36CG 3Y><1' 3— 3408 34rY1
88TH AVE N 88TH AVE N'
36]6 360' 35x.%7 3:51' 3404 6543
4125 42'9 42 13 4207 4X}• = 6544 3?0? 3/)'.
6536 \
6538 m rh 6538 6539 q 6538 6531 6S3fi
a M
6530 5,. 65:31 m 6532 6533 0 6532 6533 6532 653' 6530
4224 42`8 42'.2 4206 4200 Z { �
6524 4020 6526 6521 rq 6526 652. 6524 6525 g 6524
WINCHESTER LN Cahlander Park 2
65'8 8520 652!t 36(:0 65!$ 6S'9
M
4225 4Y9 4213 4207 420' 65.2 65'2 65'3
Y . 6511
8810 .8507
bSCir q 6506 6501 6506
43W 141-8 42.2 42_6 4100
365}7
4''2 _ y� Garden City Park 6500 3500 3408
65TH AVE N 85TH AVE N
6441 420
5442 4<01 6449 4023 40'3
119,808-sf. (2.75 ac.)
6'Y e113 6142 435-ft. frontage
643(: 6437 �Z 1A
-24 6425 13 350:
3415 3409
6424 643'. 4.130 4C0' 613±
i 6a's 6'1.4
y•g 6425 5424 �pQ 22
64.4 6n13
4A'2 64'9 8 3907
6drti 610. 3413 34"
6106 {L
64'2 10 9 905-sf.
6342 6343
q141 6331 6:Y1' fi:Y15 6349 8353 '��
6336 6337 `_ 6333
Marlin Park
6329 6390
6330 6'3'3` 63. 6325
632
,�.
~.0 6324 6325 2 6324 •. Q' 6324 6325 6324 6300
6325 M D 637 P .Q
_ 5325
6 S4 3'8 63'9 5319 63.8
63'9 63'8 63'5 6 63'8 63
rVI^Y 4 8356 +k
63'3 63'.2 53'3 Y 63`2 6. �M 5312 63 5 6312 63 Ln
630b 631"_! 635.'6 22 6345 63016 63+:9 7, 63ce 5:J_�r 6y7ii
n35x m 63,1 70,015-sf. (1.61 ac.)
fl"i SKI 635% 6345 5XI) 6y}` z 631X 637' 6350 455-ft. frontage
83 RD AVE N
6243 �. 6236
42'9 •12'3 42Y'�. 42G" d4l 4'0. 4'0' 44.9 4013 4009 q00^ � Wu 6245 39'3 3907 350' 38'3 623' Z 82Lg .2 4'.rh .y. 6'23' C D
n<__ 4U,s m W
AO'.2 6225 Y
6215 4Cth's -0yYY? 39'2 35L"4 3900 38'2 6225
\1m axmiwz5A d16S Cm,^...yy,;C;_s:Y tS GtS 2:05 5h 62•y
Brooklyn Blvd. Upper Segment)
BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR
OPPORTUNITY AREA IDENTIFICATION MAPS
http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=bc_logismap_ovsde&Clientversion=4.0&Form=True&Encode=False[9/13/2012 10:43:40 AM]
e 1
r �t
bL
rRtl,
N
sk
f.+
i
IF �• y • ,�
xF
�q f
y 3rcr w. 's N. • i i
lo 435-ft. frontage
Ao
LOGISMap Output Page
9, -S .
NAOF
i
4"x
w
- "i 4 d '�
Mimi
9
. fa
i
10,015 sf. (1.61 ac.)
'° .
455-ft. frontage
tn-
i
S,r t4='r..y Ttt 10- t'
T
a�oo ao
t
93R6 pYE N
Y
3901 3813 � a
u�e�w,e,�ws.c�r�icrwmscasaros j..
http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=bc_logismap_ovsde&CIientVersion=4.0&Form=True&Encode=FaIse[9/13/2012 10:57:35 AM]
LOGISMap Output Page
Y 6316 63,2 6315 6312 6319 63'5 c3'2 3313 3307 3301 3219
6308 6303
6307 6306
3,312 3306 3300 3218 3212 3206
6X-D ' W 6300 8301 6360
C
m
153RD AVE N
z
6243 6245 3501 6236 340' 3319 3393 3307 3301 3219 3213
4013 4007 ,Kyy� 3973 3907 3901 3813 .,, 3207
6237 1 62� 173,214-sf. (3.98 ac.)
°231 z eg 700-ft. frontage t6 "12 3346 '3°° 3224 32tn
4012 4006 6225
4' 3912 3868 3900 13812
3800 6219 $ 6219 > 6218 6219 MUMFORp.RD
JOY", 62C�: rt, � 3319 3313 3307 3301
O 6234 6213 Y 6212 6213 3219
3213
40',3 4007 6206 6207 62+_7 62 J! 3207
4041 3913 3907 3941 3813 3807 360' 3318 3312 3306 3300 6201 6200 3500 3412 340(7 3224 3218
4012 3212
4006 g0pp 3912 3408 3906 3812 3808 3800 82ND AYE N
6942 3547 272,003-sf. (6.25 ac.)
62ND AVE N 620-ft. frontage 's 32,3
T 5'36
4013 q 3907 390'!36'3 3607 34i` 6136 3� 3207
6130
3224 18 6124 6,20 LAWRENCE RD
401 3908 3900 3812 3806 6721 3313
6118 330'
0 33,.
JANET LIN 61(7 6110 3303
6109 3219 3213
TTFFFR3807 6113 c 3349
6'0_• - 3307 3305
6107
Wangstad Park 2z
4412 4i3C6 4070 39'=.8 3912 3906 3900 3824 38'6 6100
3W6 66,,9 2 60008 108,404-sf. (2.5 ac.)
7 61 STAVE N 6043 6042 6' 760-ft. frontage
r 3701 V' 6(44
401_400740D1 b 39,9 35'3 3907 39V 3519 3813 mof 3W- 3113 3707 6031 }� 6025 664
2
b w
r �22 63'.5 60,9 w 6018
6047 ' 6036 3618 3842 :5806 3800 3718 3712 3706 3700 3618 3612 3606 � - C
8024 __�_ 22 6012 60',3 6012
6030 -- oO
COMMODORE DR 6006 60(7 to 1!-066018
6024 6025 3811, 380` 6018 3707 3701 3619 3673 3607 6013 6000 Eu70 i_O
a 60±2 2
6018 �� &1 6018 61013 -1 6012
n4 4 60TH AVE N
r
6012 O 62 6CO9 6006
01 O 5449 S47tl
6013 tr q " 5937 S41'. S 5949 5953 60ti' a 5956
6(7{)6
at 6006 600, 6f_'r•.7 `59W m 5413 5942
6r}! a. 6000 s9Y_,
6.00 6" f ADMIRAL LN N
59315 5931 5936
5936 5930 '�`-', 54y6 5940 594-0 5948 5952 5956
593 5930 54Y1 5431 5930
n1a,�namvl r,n ac8es Cm,-,ac;!':_.:,G�s Gts 2311, S9z5 , ' I ( -0 n
Brooklyn Blvd. (Middle Segment)
BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR
OPPORTUNITY AREA IDENTIFICATION MAPS
http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=bc_logismap_ovsde&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True&Encode=False[9/13/2012 10:42:37 AM]
LOGISMap Output Page
" •_ � B`'16`I'II
63R6AYE M
1 w
2 Ilr; e['�J 8231
t
F
9 ,r c
3 I �
F �
f
1 �
F
r
A •
173,214-sf. (3.98 ac.)
t
6;ZAVE N 700-ft. frontage
r � l
Myoaeaaiw,eMeds.Cw aF � ..�+ �► K"„rs! �+'._
http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=bc_logismap_ovsde&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True&Encode=False[9/13/2012 10:56:20 AM]
LOGISMap Output Page
40 62W 3UM
rn' *r :
i _ :, '• .. 92ND ADEN
IL
io
INS
Y
i
Y r3 i
44b Ago-
It
,
B
n
b
X7(1 f+ frnntgnp.
` I
http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=bc_logismap_ovsde&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True&Encode=FaIse[9/13/2012 10:55:39 AM]
LOGISMap Output Page
' i1
_A
1
a '
L 5
j
. r
4
.'.°.ADORE DRS
AM
I
f... I
as x
t'
�1 I
108,404-sf. (2.5 ac.;
760-ft. frontage i
-----
._�N N -
http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=bc_logismap_ovsde&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True&Encode=False[9/13/2012 10:54:55 AM]
LOGISMap Output Page
58TH AVE N 1�
36 513? 5136 5731 5)35
35.'.f 3!'S 3IG! 3635
57:10 CO,
36'1? 5f3' 5730 5f3' 5727 5740 '
k33 3624 5'25 5/l4 84,047-sf. (1.93 ac.)
> 5r2A 5725
36'5 < 5:r.n 556-ft frontage
5,'S M
2 5719 Sl"9
3812 3, 3909 51.2 5717
351'.+7 3S_�+ 35W
3u9
36'f 5704
ADMIRAL LN N 91Gti 3245
T MA 36'3 22
Try 36xFi 350•
3:75 35' 3EC6 360- MIN 35ti5 5fW 5701
R 3&Si 569'
57TH AVE N f 5655 57TH AVE N 29,366-sf. (0.67 ac.)
5654 ---- 150-ft. frontage
y 5&15
:itl+56y5 5643 22
5942 i7
1620
56.31
BURQUE5T LN
39W 390' x
v 22
O
55'z a
3806 38i.{: °� 56". �h.4 M 22
Northport Park 5540
58TH AVE N 5'715
3801 3W,
6532
3ryr '3�Y
5525
ECKBERG DR
S55f1 q Qt
;us''s SS33 �'-t= Y 5524 'T`p
22
7Cq 7
152? 5530 _ 55'1
2
55,2
552' 552'5 y
w
m
$ �
15'3 K SS'G w5(,
SY5?
SS+i:) 3706 3700 36`2 3505�};
S'r?'
101,378-sf(2.32 ac.)
54Y 55TH AVE N 55bVT` 730-ft. of frontage
5444
54'0 3107 310'
54'.5 O
5476 , .., 5354
3606 Sao
5400 3712 V06 31W 3615 36'2 '!A 5155 5349
54 Y'
Arms—j—)VcIMS Cwrgr.!C:'-CQSCZ2G74 ^ 53'.77 S345 5:Yt2 Om 42S1t
Brooklyn Blvd. (Lower Segment)
BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR
OPPORTUNITY AREA IDENTIFICATION MAPS
http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=bc_logismap_ovsde&ClientVersion=4.0&Form=True&Encode=False[9/13/2012 10:41:27 AM]
LOGISMap Output Page
rcurm';o;,a�o -
d1D tp -
kl
1 ..J47 sf. (1.93 ac.)
7 II ;
I,� 556-ft. frontage
s y���3 •�+ 1 ��I �� y
yr*
• I
d 1
•'�rTF C7 E �T
-4
S . I`.i .,/ }.(_ ... ,.� .. ry '�� '5�,. III �� ���M1 ��•
e• I
� h 1
r.
rr �{
II-_ a----_--- +...
F,
T A'r E
41
North port Pars
http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=bc_logismap_ovsde&CIientVersion=4.0&Form=True&Encode=FaIse[9/13/2012 11:36:05 AM]
LOGISMap Output Page
. 1 lei
29,366-sf. (0.67 ac.)
.ti
57TH A, 150-ft. frontage
t
1
I —
yw[ ��� rte' } — +�yy' � • ��i.`Y�'/�L '� ..t� { � l
F
„ t..
lei
s
I
0
i
N.Hhr ort Fa k 6
is
• 4
Alm cmkrd—A,cMS Carr Tr.(C{LCGtSG52G05 .)
http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=bc_logismap_ovsde&CIientVersion=4.0&Form=True&Encode=FaIse[9/13/2012 10:52:26 AM]
City of Business and Development
BroojU Vn Center Department
d www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway,Brooklyn Center,Minnesota 55430-2199
Phone 763.569.3300 TTYNoice 711 Fax 763.569.3494
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chair Sean Rahn and Planning Commissioners
FROM: Gary Eitel, Business& Development Director
Tim Benetti, Planning & Zoning Specialist
DATE: September 21, 2012
RE: Review and Discussion of Architectural Guidelines and Standards [for Commercial
and Industrial Districts]
September 27, 2012 Planning Commission Agenda—Discussion Items
As part of Staff's ongoing work in providing information for the City's possible implementation
of architectural standards, we are presenting once again an updated list of select cities that have
architectural and/or design standards incorporated into their own City ordinances. Staff initially
presented a similar list of cities last May 2011, in response to the proposed architectural
standards approved under the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD (attached for reference).
Planning Staff is preparing a similar list of guidelines for the City to adopt, but in the meantime
we ask the PC to review these Shingle Creek and other Cities' guidelines and determine which
standards are more to your liking and what are not.
Please note there is no official action to be taken or public hearing scheduled for this study
session item. If you have any questions or comments prior to the meeting, feel free to call Gary
at (763) 569-3305 / email GEitelLi ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us or Tim at (763) 569-3319 /
TBenetti(a�ci.brookly��-center.mn.us).
Also, please let Rebecca or Tim know if you are unable to attend or need to miss next
Thursday night's meeting. Thank you.
Shingle Creek Crossing (Submitted 5111/11)
(Modified 5/23/11)
Architectural Design Guidelines Architectural Consortium LLC
The overall design concept is to create a cohesive master planned development
combining potential uses that may include anchor tenants, small shop retail, restaurants,
enclosed mall tenants, as well as open-air tenants. The architecture shall maintain a
uniform character and reflect a style that provides for a harmonious retail development
within the project. The aesthetics for key design elements shall be an abstraction of
Shingle Creek, and be found in the pallet of materials such as masonry, stone, and metal
accents that complement the established streetscape on Bass Lake Road/County Road 10.
BUILDING ORIENTATION
- Site planning concept of multiple buildings with a focus inward as well as
exposure toward Highway100, Bass Lake Road, and Xerxes Avenue as generally
depicted on the 05/11/2011 site plan submittal.
- The orientation of buildings should take advantage of available view sheds of
future development sites where possible.
- Building entrances shall have a direct relationship to convenient parking fields.
- Buildings along Bass Lake Road shall be located close to the road to create a
pedestrian/ urban environment with signage on the street and principal entrances
and signage facing internal communal parking and entry drives.
- Anchor tenants along Highway 100 shall take advantage of the highway visibility
by backing up to the property lines with loading docks and servicing and may
incorporate architectural elements that reflect some components of the front
facades such as signage features and raised parapets.
- Buildings along the day lighted Shingle Creek, as available to restaurants, shall
maximize opportunities for outdoor patios, pedestrian relationships and other
recreational interactions.
- Buildings containing restaurants adjacent to water features shall maximize
opportunities for outdoor patios and internal views of the water.
- Buildings along the major entry corridor shall locate in close proximity to the
street to form a"main street,"pedestrian friendly, environment.
- Tenants in the enclosed mall shall take advantage of internal shopping traffic as
well as external.
BUILDING DESIGN
Building Mass
- Varying scale of buildings shall be encouraged.
- Varying rooflines to create interest in design styles shall be encouraged.
- Maximum building coverage of the overall site shall not exceed 40%.
- Large expanses of blank and featureless wall facing public street frontage shall
incorporate architectural elements to mitigate the expanse.
Facade Design
- Colorful canopies, roofs, and accents are encouraged, however controlled to a
palette of selected colors pursuant to the color and material board submitted and
approved by the city.
- Architectural character shall be consistently contemporary (non-traditional) with
all buildings within master plan.
- Masonry detailing such as soldier coursing, plane changes, or patterning shall be
encouraged.
- The use of cornices, ornamental lights, graphics, Tenant blade signs, and other
architectural details shall be encouraged.
- Buildings that front Bass Lake Road, Xerxes Avenue, or main entry drives must
have four-sided architecture. The architecture shall reflect a two-story appearance
with the use of upper windows, roof forms, and undulated skylines. Storefront
glass shall dominate each facade. Where true, clear storefront glass is not feasible
due to tenant functions, the use of spandrel glass is acceptable.
- Multi-tenant buildings shall break up the rhythm of the facade for individuality of
shops to reinforce a"main street"theme of architecture.
- Elevations facing Highway 100 may incorporate signage features where visible
from the highway or not screened from landscaping.
Building Materials
- Materials shall be selected for suitability to the type of buildings and the design in
which they are used. Building walls are to be finished in aesthetically acceptable
tones and colors to be compatible with tones and colors of the approved palette.
- Materials shall be of a durable quality.
- All wood treatment shall be painted and weather proofed.
- Colors and specifications of masonry and stucco colors should be a consistent
range throughout the development
- Rear of buildings shall be in a color to match predominant front masonry colors.
- Existing buildings may be renovated to match new construction with the use of
paint colors or other applied surface treatments.
- Buildings A thru M shall have at least all four sides with at least 50% Class I and
remaining 50% Class II materials. Building N shall have its northerly and
easterly faces with at least 50% of Class I and remaining 50% Class II; with rear
and sides of 25% Class I and 75% Class II materials. Buildings P & Q shall have
their front facades with 50% of Class I and 50% of Class II, with all other faces
with at least 25% of Class I and 75% Class II materials.
- Class I materials shall include brick or acceptable brick-type material; marble,
granite, other natural stone or acceptable natural looking stone; textured cement
stucco; copper; porcelain; glass; architectural textured concrete pre-cast panels;
and other materials including masonry units with enhanced detailing such as
patterns, textures, color, dimension, banding, and brick inlay as approved by the
City Planning Commission and City Council.
Class II materials shall include exposed aggregate concrete panels; burnished
concrete block; integral colored split face (rock face) and exposed aggregate
concrete block; cast-in-place concrete; artificial stucco (E.I.F.S., Drivit); artificial
stone; fiber-reinforced cement board siding with a minimum thickness of 1/4 inch;
canvas or vinyl awnings; prefinished metal; and other materials not listed
elsewhere as approved by the City Planning Commission and City Council.
Doors and Windows
- Canopies shall be encouraged at entry ways.
- Window frame, material, and color to complement architectural style and be
consistent in color throughout development.
- Window openings may be modulated to scale and proportion that is compatible
with the architectural style. Maximize storefront and graphic opportunities to
avoid long expanses of blank and featureless walls at street fronts.
- A minimum of 8' clear space shall be provided from sidewalk elevation to the
lowest point of a canopy and or suspended sign.
- Window frames shall be constructed of prefinished metal.
- Window and doors shall be glazed in clear glass for retail buildings. Mirrored
windows shall be discouraged.
- Where appropriate, the use of spandrel glass may be incorporated to mimic
storefront glass.
- Graphic elements may be incorporated into wall areas to mimic storefronts.
I
SCREENING
- Loading areas shall be screened from public view with walls similar to adjacent
building material, fences, landscaping, or physical distance separation.
- Service and utility doors to be painted to match, or be compatible with,
surrounding colors.
- Drive — thru or service lanes shall be screened with berming, landscaping or
fencing.
- Rooftop units may be screened by parapets or wall/fencing materials, or paint to
match surrounding colors when visible from the public right of way.
FRANCHISE DESIGN
- The requirements of regional and national franchises shall be allowed to maintain
their corporate identity and design theme but shall be encouraged to utilize similar
materials, scale and style of these architectural standards.
LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
Landscape design
- Plant material is to be utilized within the master plan as an aid to provide
continuity within the site and provide a recognized definition of its boundaries.
- Thematic boulders and water elements shall be incorporated to reinforce the
branding of Shingle Creek as a site amenity
- Reference the 2010 Bass Lake Road landscaping as inspiration to both plant
varieties and theme.
- Overstory trees shall be utilized along external and internal roadways to reinforce
roadway pattern but, placed so as to not block visibility of commercial signage.
- Unity of design shall be achieved by repetition of certain plant varieties, planting
patterns, and other streetscape materials and by correlation with the approved
landscape plan.
- Entry points into the site are to be specially landscaped and are to be designed
with a common theme.
- Plant materials are to be utilized as a screening element for parking and building
utility areas.
- Plant materials are to be utilized within parking lot islands, grouped massing of
landscape is encouraged in parking lots versus individual planting to maximize
landscape impact and allow functional snow removal. Some islands may be
paved as pedestrian walk areas.
- Loading, service, utility and outdoor storage areas that are visible from public
roadways shall be predominantly screened with fencing, walls, landscaping or
berms. When natural materials are used as principal screening, 75% opacity must
be achieved year round through the use of evergreen trees.
- Plant materials shall be selected with regard to its interesting structure, texture,
color, seasonal interest, climate zone durability and its ultimate growth
characteristics.
- Where building sites limit planting, the placement of plant materials in planters,
pots, or within paved areas is encouraged.
- Perennial/shrub planting beds, trees and turf areas shall be irrigated with an
automatic irrigation system to provide optimal plant establishment and long-term
plant health.
Parking
- When determined appropriate, commercial buildings are to accommodate
bicycle/motorcycle parking areas and bike racks.
- Cross parking between building areas shall be permitted.
- Parking stalls to be a minimum of 9'x 18' and drive aisles to be 24' (60' bay
spacing) for two-way traffic and drive aisles to be 20' (56' bay spacing) for one-
way traffic. Parking stalls may be oriented at 60, 75, and 90 degree angles.
- Major drive aisles or truck routes may have increased aisle widths.
- Parking lot layout shall include clear, traffic movement for both pedestrian and
automobile.
- A minimum overall parking ratio of 4.5 /1000 shall be maintained
- Site impervious surface should be minimized to help preserve green space, yet
provide the necessary parking amount to support the development regardless of
uses.
Lighting
- Lighting shall provide continuity and consistency throughout the area. All
parking lot lights shall be metal halide or 2000-4000 kelvin LED and be uniform
in style, color, and height. Maximum pole height of 50' in parking areas and 28'
in entry drive areas and along property edges.
- Pedestrian lighting shall be of pedestrian scale height (12'-18') and be uniform in
style and color.
- Light poles, fixtures, and bases shall be a consistent dark color (i.e. bronze, black,
or brown).
- Exterior wall lighting shall be encouraged to enhance the building design and the
adjoining landscape.
- Lighting styles and building fixtures shall be of a design and scale compatible
with the building and adjacent areas. Shoe or hat box style fixtures are acceptable
for taller parking lot lighting. More detailed ornamental style fixtures shall be
encouraged for pedestrian impact.
- Light levels that promote a safe environment are required. Excessive brightness
shall be prohibited.
- Dark sky and cutoff style fixtures shall be used for safety purposes.
Pedestrian Connections
- Pedestrian connectivity shall be incorporated to link all buildings within the site
where feasible.
- Pedestrian connections shall be made to the existing public sidewalk system.
- Benches or seating shall be provided at appropriate areas for pedestrians.
- Striping of crosswalks shall be required at appropriate crossings.
- Outdoor seating areas and outdoor sales areas shall be incorporated where
appropriate. Such areas shall utilize a unified theme and approach to the defining
elements (structural elements, railings, shading, paving, lighting, landscaping) for
the creation of these exterior spaces.
Bicycle Connections
- Trail connections shall be maintained and connected to the existing overpass
system.
- Bike parking and resting areas shall be incorporated as an element of the Shingle
Creek waterway.
- The trail shall be designed to allow continuous flow of bicycle traffic as well as
areas of refuge.
- Pedestrian shopping sidewalks shall connect to the trail at appropriate
intersections.
ARCHITECTURAL/ BUILDING MATERIAL STANDARDS
FROM VARIOUS METRO CITIES
BROOKLYN PARK
Figure 152.392.01 Classes of Materials
Class 1 Class 2
1. Brick 1. Industrial grade concrete precast panels
2. Natural or cementious stone 2. Ceramic
3. Glass, whether block, windows, or opaque or 3. Wood
mirrored panels
4. Masonry stucco, or EFIS in conformance with 4. Tile (masonry, stone or clay)
the [CC ES report
5. Seamless metal panels (including copper) 5. Other materials not listed elsewhere as
approved by the City Manager
6. Specialty concrete block (including textured,
burnished block or rock faced block)
7. Architecturally textured concrete precast
panels
8. Other materials not listed elsewhere as
approved by the City Manager
(B) Required combination of materials. Buildings must incorporate classes of materials for each facade
in the following manner:
(1) Office, service, and retail buildings.
(a) Front facades and side and rear facades visible from public right(s)-of-way, the
public view from adjacent properties, parks, or residential uses or districts must be
composed of at least two or more Class 1 materials totaling 65% of the facade.
(b) Side and rear facades not visible from public right(s)-of-way, parks, public view
from adjacent properties or residential uses or districts may use any combination of Class
1 or 2 materials.
(c) Facades visible from public right(s)-of-way may include windows, doors, canopies
or other treatments that help mitigate the appearance of blank walls.
(2) Industrial and warehouse buildings, multi-tenant office/industrial/warehouse or
showroom/warehouse or other combinations.
(a) Front facades must be composed of at least two or more Class 1 materials totaling
65%.
(b) Side and rear facades visible from public right(s)-of-way, parks, public view from
adjacent properties, or residential uses or districts must be composed of at least two or
more Class 1 materials totaling 50%.
(c) Side and rear facades not visible from public right(s)-of-way, parks, public view
from adjacent properties or residential uses or districts may use any combination of Class
1 or 2 materials.
(3) Buildings for uses that do not conform to any of the above list of uses must conform to the
materials and proportion of office and retail buildings listed in subdivision (1), above.
Minnetonka
a) It is not the intent of the city to restrict design freedom unduly when reviewing project architecture in
connection with a site and building plan. However, it is in the best interest of the city to promote high
standards of architectural design and compatibility with surrounding structures and
neighborhoods. Architectural plans shall be prepared by an architect or other qualified person acceptable
to the director of planning and shall show the following:
1) elevations of all sides of the building;
2) type and color of exterior building materials;
3) a typical floor plan;
4) dimensions of all structures; and
5) the location of trash and recycling containers and of heating, ventilation and air conditioning
equipment.
b) Unadorned prestressed concrete panels, concrete block and unfinished metal shall not be permitted
as exterior materials for residential or non-residential buildings. This restriction shall apply to all principal
structures and to all accessory buildings except those accessory buildings not visible from any exterior
property line. The city may, at its discretion, allow architecturally enhanced block or concrete panels.
APPLE VALLEY
(A) The design of all building site and landscape plans shall be prepared by a professional skilled and
trained to perform these services. Buildings shall be designed to fit the particular site and shall
be harmonious with adjacent buildings, topography and natural surroundings and shall otherwise
meet the provisions of this chapter.
(B) In order to assure that new construction is compatible with existing structures and neighborhood
environments, it is necessary to establish minimum design and building material
standards. These standards will serve to prevent new development from de-stabilizing adjacent
neighborhoods by mitigating the intrinsic negative impacts associated with structures of greater
bulk and density. The following standards are established to accomplish these ends:
(1) Exterior vertical surface design. All exterior vertical surfaces of residential, multiple
residential, commercial, industrial and institutional structures of any type shall be treated
as a front and have an equally attractive or same fascia.
(2) Design of garages. Garages and other accessory buildings shall have a design and
appearance that will not detract from the main building(s) or adjacent buildings.
(3) Mechanical protrusions. All necessary mechanical protrusions visible to the exterior shall
be screened or handled in a manner such that they are not visually obvious and are
compatible with the surrounding development. For rooftop mechanical equipment,
satisfaction of this requirement shall require that the equipment be fully screened visually
by wether a parapet wall along the edge of the building or by a screen immediately
surrounding such equipment. The height of the parapet wall or screen shall be at least
the height of the equipment. Parapet walls must be an extension of the primary building
materials comprising the outside walls of the building; screens must be constructed of
durable, low- maintenance materials and be either a light, neutral color or the same color
as the primary building materials of the outside walls. Rooftop equipment shall be
setback from the edge of the roof a minimum of 20 feet. For ground mounted equipment,
satisfaction of this requirement shall require that the equipment be fully screened by
either a masonry wall or an opaque landscape screen. The height of the wall or
landscape screen shall be at least the height of the equipment. Masonry walls must be
constructed of the same materials and color s the primary materials comprising the
outside walls of the building; landscape screening must be of plant materials that are fully
opaque year-round. Equipment shall be painted a neutral earth-tone color. All
mechanical protrusions shall be pointed out on the site plan and elevations.
(4) Materials. Materials shall be those normally utilized in this part of the country for
permanent type construction, which are found in what is generally accepted as good
architectural design and which are found to be compatible with nearby existing
buildings. Required building materials shall depend upon the use of the building as
follows:
(a) Commercial buildings shall have a vertical exposed exterior finish of 100% non-
combustible, non-degradable and maintenance-free construction materials (such
as face brick or natural stone but excluding such construction materials as sheet or
corrugated aluminum, iron, or concrete block of any kind or similar). Exterior roof-
top finishes shall preclude the use of exposed or plated metal; any metal surface
shall be coated or anodized with a non- reflective, glare-free finish.
(b) Industrial buildings shall have a vertical exposed exterior finish of 100% non-
combustible, non-degradable and maintenance-free construction materials (such
as face brick, natural stone or decorative concrete block but excluding construction
materials as sheet or corrugated aluminum, iron, plain or painted plain concrete
block or similar). Any decorative concrete block shall be colored only by means of
a pigment impregnated throughout the entire block. Exterior roof-top finishes shall
preclude the use of exposed or plated metal; any metal surface shall be coated or
anodized with a non- reflective, glare-free finish.
EDINA
K. Building Design and Construction. In addition to the other restrictions of this Section and of Section
410 of this Code, the use, construction, alteration or enlargement of any building or structure within the
Planned Commercial District shall meet the following standards:
1. All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be one or a combination of the following:
a. face brick;
b. natural stone;
c. specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an
applied decorative material or texture;
d. factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction if the panel materials are any
of those noted above; or
e. glass or prefinished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron).
2. All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the
erection of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of the same materials as the
original building and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design
and general appearance.
MAPLE GROVE
Building exteriors. Within the central business district and within 800 feet of the right-of-way of any
freeway, all building exteriors shall be brick, stone or glass, or any combination thereof, except for trim
accessories and the roof. The exteriors of all other buildings located elsewhere in the B district shall
consist of brick, stone, or glass, or any combination thereof, or a decorative material approved by the city
council, including, but not limited to, decorative masonry, but not including such things as plain basement
block or metal.
EAGAN
Exterior surface materials of a newly constructed building shall be subject to the following requirements:
A. Classes of materials. Exterior building materials shall be divided into Class I, Class II, Class III,
Class IV and Class V categories as follows:
Class I
• Clay-based masonry units; brick (integrally colored)
• Natural stone
• Glass/spandrel glass
• Architectural metal panels which cover a wall (e.g. copper panels, composite metal panels)
• Other comparable or superior materials (as approved by the city council)
Class II
• Specialty concrete block such as textured, burnished block or rock faced block
• Masonry stucco
• Manufactured stone provided it replicates the appearance of natural stone, not concrete block
• Other comparable or superior materials (as approved by city council)
Class III
• Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS)
• Architecturally precast textured concrete panels
• Glass block
• Ornamental metal as an accent to the building
• Cement-based and architectural products (e.g. Quik-Brik and HardieBoard)
• Other comparable or superior materials (as approved by city council)
Class IV
• Smooth concrete block
• Smooth scored concrete block
• Smooth concrete tip up panels
• Ceramic
• Wood
• Other comparable or superior materials (as approved by city council)
Class V
• Steel, sheet or corrugated aluminum, or iron provided it is coated or anodized with a non-reflective,
glare-free finish)
• Any other material not within the standards set forth in paragraph b.i.
B. New constructed buildings shall incorporate the classes of materials as follows:
(1) Buildings within LB, NB, CSC, RD and BP zoning districts shall use at least two Class I
materials and the building must be finished with at least 65 percent Class I materials, not
more than 35 percent Class II or Class III materials, and not more than ten percent Class
IV materials.
(2) Buildings within GB, 1-1 and 1-2, zoning districts and located 800 feet or less from a
county, state or federal right-of-way shall use at least two different Class I or Class 11
materials and the building must be finished with at least 65 percent Class I or Class 11, not
more than 35 percent of Class III and Class IV materials; in no case shall Class IV
materials exceed ten percent.
(3) Buildings within 1-1, 1-2 or GB zoning districts and located more than 800 feet from a
county, state or federal right-of-way shall comply with the following:
a. Such buildings shall utilize at least 75 percent Class I, Class II or Class III
materials. Buildings shall be constructed of a vertical finish made of
noncombustible, non-degradable, and low maintenance construction material.
b. No more than 25 percent of the finish of the exterior, exposed walls of any newly
constructed building may be finished with Class IV and V materials.
BURNSVILLE
(A) Building Design And Materials: All buildings shall be designed to accomplish the goals and policies of
the comprehensive plan. Building materials shall be attractive in appearance, of a durable finish, and
be of a quality that is compatible and harmonious with adjacent structures. All buildings shall be of
good aesthetic and architectural quality to ensure they will maintain and enhance the property values
of neighboring properties and not adversely impact the community's public health, safety and general
welfare.
1. Design Elements: All new building fronts and refacing of existing buildings shall include a
minimum of three (3) of the following elements:
a. Accent materials;
b. A visually pleasing front entry that, in addition to doors, shall be accented a minimum of
one hundred fifty (150) square feet around the door entrance for single occupancy
buildings and a minimum of three hundred (300) square feet total for the front of multi-
tenant buildings (this area shall be counted as 1 element);
C. Twenty five percent(25%) window coverage on each front that faces a street;
d. Contrasting, yet complementary, material colors;
e. A combination of horizontal and vertical design features;
f. Irregular building shapes; or
g. Other architectural features in the overall architectural concept. If the applicant and the
development review committee (DRC) cannot agree on the proposed building exterior
elevations, the applicant shall be required to make an application for a conditional use
permit to prove compatibility.
2. Accent Materials: Accent materials shall be wrapped around walls visible from public view. Painting
shall not be substituted for visual relief, accenting, or a required element. No wall shall exceed one
hundred feet(100') in length without visual relief. "Visual relief' may be defined as the incorporation of
design features such as windows, horizontal and vertical patterns, contrasting material colors, or
varying wall depths. Use of fiber cement trim, soffit and fascia shall be allowed as accent materials.
3. Major Exterior Materials: Major exterior materials of all walls including face brick, stone, glass, stucco,
synthetic stucco, fiber cement vertical panel siding, architectural concrete and precast panels shall be
acceptable as the major exterior wall surface when they are incorporated into an overall design of the
building. Stucco, synthetic stucco or fiber cement vertical panel siding shall not be allowed within
twenty four inches (24") from grade. Use of rain screens, panelized systems, or curtain walls are
encouraged and will be verified for high quality design and materials through the development review
committee. Fiber cement seam lines shall be architecturally integrated into the building design so that
they are not visible. Seam lines can be filled, covered by other accent material or other method
thereby making the seam lines invisible. Color impregnated decorative block shall also be allowed as
a major exterior wall material, and shall be required to be sealed. All materials shall be color
impregnated with the exception of allowing architectural concrete precast panel systems and fiber
cement siding to be painted. Painting shall not be allowed on color impregnated, major exterior
materials. Request for approval of cast in place systems shall be through a conditional use permit or
planned unit development, whichever is deemed appropriate by city staff. If the architectural precast
panel systems are painted, they shall be properly prepared and maintained regularly to prevent
peeling, stripping, shading or any other form of deterioration or discoloration. Proof of manufacturer's
painting specifications shall be supplied prior to issuance of a building permit. This subsection (A)3
shall also apply to all exterior repairs, remodeling, or expansion of existing buildings that require a
building permit.
4. Restricted Exterior Materials: Unadorned prestressed concrete panels, whether smooth or raked,
nondecorative concrete block, sheet metal, corrugated metal or unfinished metal shall not be used as
exterior materials. This restriction shall apply to all principal structures and to all accessory buildings
except those accessory buildings not visible from any property line. No more than twenty five percent
(25%) of any exterior wall on a building shall be fiber cement siding, wood or metal accent material.
This twenty five percent(25%) limit may be exceeded when used in a panelized system that consists
of prefabricated, or factory manufactured, panels that form a structural envelope, and significantly
simplify on site framing, and request for approval shall be through a conditional use permit or planned
unit development.
5. Visual Relief: No wall shall exceed one hundred feet(100') in length without visual relief. "Visual relief'
may be defined as a varying design of the building by incorporating design features such as windows,
horizontal and vertical patterns, contrasting material colors or varying wall depths.
6. Roofs: Roofs which are exposed or an integral part of the building aesthetics shall be constructed only
of commercial grade asphalt shingles, wood shingles, standing seam metal, slate, tile, or copper. Flat
roofs, which are generally parallel with the first floor elevation, are not subject to these material
limitations.
7. Building And Roofing Materials: All building and roofing materials shall meet current accepted industry
standards and tolerances, and shall be subject to review and approval by the development review
committee for quality, durability, and aesthetic appeal. For all new buildings and building exterior
renovations, the applicant shall submit to the city product samples, color building elevations, and
associated drawings which illustrate the construction techniques to be used in the installation of such
materials. Building and roofing materials not specifically approved in this section may be allowed by a
conditional use permit or planned unit development only after it is demonstrated that the proposed
material is equal to or better than approved materials. The long range maintenance of the proposed
material shall be incorporated as a condition of the approval and filed on the property.
PLYMOUTH
Buildings shall comply with the following list of allowable and prohibited materials:
(1) Allowable Materials.
a. Easily maintained materials that are durable and attractive at close distances (e.g., from the
view of a pedestrian).
b. Materials that have an attractive pattern, texture, and quality detailing.
c. Brick, stone, or high-quality pre-cast concrete (colored and textured).
d. Metals with matt finish and with neutral or earth tone colors; metals that are used for exterior
walls should have visible corner moldings and trim.
e. Transparent glass.
f. Canvas awnings.
(2) Prohibited materials.
a. Non-durable siding materials such as plywood, corrugated metal or fiberglass, or other
materials that decay rapidly when exposed to the elements.
b. Materials that have no pattern or relief, especially when those materials are applied to large
wall surfaces.
c. Simulated brick or stone.
d. Wood, except as accent materials or in elements that are integrated with other—desiredll
materials.
e. Mirrored glass, especially mirrored glass that faces an active pedestrian street.
f. Materials that represent corporate colors, patterns, or trademarks.
g. Brightly colored metal roofing or canopies.
h. Concrete that is not enhanced as indicated under—Allowable Materialsll in (1) above,
especially pre-cast, tilt-up walls.
i. Synthetic awnings and awnings designed to be illuminated from within.
BLOOMINGTON
The following regulations apply to all primary and accessory buildings and additions in the following
(1) Exterior Wall Finish. Exterior wall surfaces of all buildings, excluding those portions of
foundation walls extending normally above finished grade, shall be faced with glass, exterior cement
plaster(stucco), natural stone, brick, architectural concrete, metal in accordance with adopted policies
and procedures set forth in the adopted Resolution, or an equivalent or better. Except for glass or metal,
all color shall be integral to the exterior wall finish material unless a colored and opaque coating for all or
some part of the exterior wall finish material is specifically approved by the City Council as part of a
development approval process and where the application has included:
(A) Certification by the coating manufacturer that the coating is appropriate for the intended purpose
and will not damage the exterior wall finish material to which it is to be applied; and
(B) Certification by the exterior wall finish material manufacturer that the coating to be applied is one
that is appropriate for the exterior wall finish material and that its use will not reduce or void the
exterior wall finish material warranty.
COON RAPIDS
(1) Building Appearance. The design of buildings and exterior building materials shall be consistent with
the following standards.
(a) Building Character. The design of buildings shall have a comparable, compatible and
complementary relationship to surrounding land uses. Buildings shall be designed with interesting
and varied exterior materials, setbacks and architectural features and details. All exterior wall
surfaces shall be of the same materials.
(b) Development Guidelines. Developments shall satisfy the following guidelines. Determination of
whether these guidelines are satisfied shall be made by the Planning Commission or by the City
Council after receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission.
i. Vary building massing, using methods including staggering building components, adding columns,
recessing doorways, creating interesting shapes and short, uneven facades
ii. Articulate building facades using techniques such as staggering, arcades, awnings, special
window treatments, ornamentation and unique details. Face primary entries to public or
private streets and orient doors for loading and unloading goods away from public or private
streets.
iii. Provide a variety of roof shapes using techniques including pitched, gable or hip roofs or
detailed parapets and cornices creating interesting roof profiles for flat roofs.
iv. Every building shall include a focal element or feature adding interest or distinction, using
techniques such as elevating parts of buildings, towers, or emphasizing a prominent part of
the building such as a corner or main entry or by using features such as canopies, porticoes,
overhangs, arcades, facade recesses and projections and peaked roofs or raised parapets
above doors or windows.
v. High quality, exterior building materials shall be used. Such materials include brick, natural
stone, textured pre-cast masonry, integrally colored, concrete masonry units, and similar
materials. Accent materials may include metal, glass block, EIFS and similar materials.
Exterior materials shall not include smooth-faced concrete block, pre-fabricated steel panels,
reflective glass or aluminum, fiberglass or vinyl siding.
vi. Exterior colors approved by the Planning Commission shall not be changed, at the time of
building construction or in the future, unless approved by the Commission.
vii. Where approved, the motor vehicle fuel pump canopy roof shall have the same shape,
materials and color as the roof of the principal building. Canopy supports shall be enclosed in
decorative masonry or metal columns.[Revised 1/2/96, Ordinance 15571
VADNAIS HEIGHTS
18.030 Architectural Guidelines and Requirements. The overall appearance and compatibility of individual
buildings to other site elements or to surrounding development will be given primary
consideration in the site plan approval process.
(1)All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be one or a combination of the following:
(a) face brick and brick accents.
(b) glass, when used in combinations with one or more of the other materials listed herein.
(c) natural stone.
(d) stucco and similar types of exterior finish systems.
(e) architectural-quality pre-finished metal panels when used as a secondary feature in
combination with one or more of the other materials listed above.
(f) "rock-face" or"split-face"concrete block only when used as a secondary, accent material in
combination with one or more of the materials listed above.
(2) Buildings throughout the City Center District shall reflect compatible and complementary colors and
materials. This includes brick materials and earthtone colors for building treatments and
earthtone or green roofs.
(3) Building rooflines should be articulated, through the use of arches or other appropriate detail.
(4)All ground mounted or roof mounted HVAC, utility meters and other such equipment shall be well-
screened from eye level view from adjacent streets, parking lots and entrances of
adjacent buildings.
(5) All subsequent additions, exterior alterations, and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of
an original building or buildings shall be constructed of the same materials as the original
building and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design
and general appearance, to the extent that such design and construction is compatible
with the City Center standards.
(6)Any exterior building wall adjacent to or visible from a public street, public open space, or abutting
property may not exceed sixty (60) feet in length without significant visual relief consisting
of one or more of the following:
(a) the facade shall be divided architecturally by means of significantly different materials
or textures, or;
(b) horizontal offsets of at least four 4) feet in depth, or;
(c) vertical offsets in the roof line of at least four(4)feet, or;
(d)windows at the first floor level which is either recessed or extending horizontally at
least one (1)foot from the fagade.
(7) No outdoor storage of goods or merchandise shall be permitted except as provided in 18.020(3)(4).
(8) Retail/service uses shall incorporate pedestrian amenities and design features to establish a village
type environment.
(9) No single purpose retail facility shall be constructed after September 1, 2006 that is in excess of
50,000 ground floor area square feet unless it is a multi-story building. Single purpose
retail shall mean that retail sale of goods and incidental services are the principal function
of the facility. The City Council may increase these limits based on an overall
comprehensive site development plan containing a special pedestrian scale building plan,
architectural fagade treatment and relief, connections to other retail and service uses and
surrounding development, imaginative pedestrian outdoor space design and
harmonizing, scale reducing parking area appearance treatment.
WOODBURY
Sec. 24-304. Exterior architectural standards for commercial, office, industrial, warehouse and similar
buildings in nonresidential zoning districts.
Sec. 24-307. Exterior design standards.
(a) Building exteriors shall be subject to the following standards:
(1) Classes of materials. For the purpose of this subsection, materials shall be divided into class
I, class II, class III and class IV categories as follows:
Class I
a. Brick.
b. Natural stone.
c. Glass.
d. Copper panels.
Class 11
a. Specialty concrete block such as textured, burnished block or rock faced block.
b. Architecturally precast textured concrete panels.
c. Masonry stucco.
d. Ceramic.
Class 111
a. Exterior insulation and finish system (EIFS).
b. Opaque panels.
c. Ornamental metal.
d. Fiber-cement exterior siding.
Class IV
a. Smooth concrete block.
b. Smooth scored concrete block.
c. Smooth concrete tip up panels.
d. Glass block.
e. Wood.
(2) Buildings shall incorporate classes of materials in the following manner:
a. Office, church, school, and commercial buildings must use at least three class I
materials and must be composed of at least 65 percent class I materials; not more
than 35 percent class II or class III material and not more than ten percent class IV
materials.
b. Industrial and warehouse buildings must use at least two different class I or II
materials and be composed of at least 65 percent class I or class II; not more than 35
percent of class III or class IV materials. Not more than ten percent of the building
shall be class IV materials.
c. Any nonresidential structure adjacent to an interstate highway, or any multi-tenant
office/warehouse or showroom/warehouse or other combinations shall be 65 percent
class I materials on primary exteriors. Exterior walls with limited public exposure may
use combinations of class II, III or IV materials.
d. Buildings in nonresidential zoning districts that are not office, commercial, industrial or
warehouse uses shall conform to the exterior finish materials and proportions of
office or commercial buildings unless otherwise approved by the city council as
meeting the purpose of this division.
e. The use of class II, III or IV materials shall be distributed throughout the exterior of a
building unless the city agrees that materials consolidated on more visible locations
provides the most positive architectural appeal to the general public.
f. Expansions of less than 50 percent of the floor area of the existing building may use
the same or superior materials as the existing structure.
g. A distinctively different color of brick may be considered as a second class I material.
However, minor blended color variations shall not be considered as a separate
material.
h. To be counted as a primary material, the product must comprise at least five percent
of the exterior wall.
(3) Buildings may be constructed primarily of one specific class I material provided the design is
obviously superior to the general intent of this division, provides variation in detailing, footprint of
the structure or deviations in long wall sections to provide visual interest.
(4) Garage doors, window trim, flashing accent items and the like, shall not constitute required
materials that make up the exterior of a building.
(5) As viewed from ground levels from all locations, all mechanical equipment located on the
roof or around the perimeter of a structure shall be hidden by a raised parapet or with materials
comparable and compatible with exterior building materials.
a. A raised parapet or other architectural feature that is an integral part(s) of the building
may be required as screening for rooftop mechanical equipment or to soften rooftop
views. If shown that rooftop units will be visible, an increased parapet height or
additional screening shall be required so that the rooftop equipment is hidden from
view.
b. The back of parapets that are visible must be finished with materials and colors
compatible with the front of the parapet.
c. Screening for rooftop mechanical equipment shall incorporate similar architectural
features of the building and/or be constructed of a material and color compatible with
other elements of the building.
d. Screening methods of incidental rooftop equipment deemed unnecessary to be
hidden from view by the community development director or a designee shall be
approved by the city.
e. Metal cabinets used to enclose and protect rooftop mechanical equipment shall not
substitute as screening.
f. Wood, wood fencing, and other materials requiring maintenance or that may become
unsightly, are not permitted.
(6) Exposed roof materials shall be similar to, or an architectural equivalent of a 300 pound or
better asphalt or fiberglass shingle, wooden shingle, standing seam metal roof or better.
(7) Garish or bright accent colors (i.e. orange, bright yellow, or fluorescent colors) for such
buildings such as cloth or metal awnings, trim, banding, walls, entries or any portion of the
building shall be minimized, but in no case shall such coloring exceed five percent of each wall
area.
(8) Brick shall mean the conventional molded rectangular block of baked clay, nominal four-inch
width. Thin brick veneer, faux brick, or decorative brick shall not be permitted as a building
material for nonresidential structures.
(9) Brick or stone exteriors shall not be painted during the life of the exterior materials.
(10) Equipment used for mechanical, processing, bulk storage tanks, or equipment used for
suppressing noise, odors and the like that protrudes from a side of a building or is located on the
ground adjacent to a building shall be hidden from public view with materials and designs
matching those used for the
City of Business and Development
Department
Xjurooklyll Center— www.cityojbrooklyncenter.org
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway,Brooklyn Center,Minnesota 55430-2199
Phone 763.569.3300 TTY/Voice 711 Fax 763.569.3494
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chair Sean Rahn and Planning Commissioners
FROM: Gary Eitel, Business &Development Director
Tim Benetti, Planning & Zoning Specialist
DATE: September 21, 2012
RE: Review and Consideration of Final Plat for Monty Addition
6901 and 6915 Brooklyn Boulevard(Slim's Pizza Restaurant)
Please see attached for the Planning Commission's review the proposed Final Plat of Monty
Addition. The preliminary plat was reviewed by the Planning Commission at the August 16,
2012 meeting, and was approved by the City Council (with certain conditions) at the August 27th
meeting.
Subject to the outcome of this review, this final plat is scheduled to be presented to the City
Council at either the October 8th or 22nd meeting for final consideration and approvals.
If you have any questions or comments prior to the meeting, feel free to call planning staff at
(763) 569-3335.
LNtA/NADE AND URLITYEASEAETITS ARE WORN THUS} M O NTY ADDITION C.R. ooc. No.
► ►
�—5 /WOW ALL PERSONS BY 71AFSE PRESENTS that Monty Recity,LLC a Mimrseata/knifed lWity oanpany,oener of the fd/owhg
dssorbed prWorty situated h Um Cbmty of HweNper,State of Mk nowata, to NL•
5 \ \ \ Par.2: fiatppaf ofLLot 1,Sioak 1I,C YYtAddffroir,l enWacW wimthyLot S,eBlodi f/SLnHt Manor.of
WO to di vi and ufrfy eoaanents as shoen on pat(aa to/and h Per 2)
\ \ Lot Z Block 1,Cady Addibou attending to ms recorded plot mereW.
J L — — \ Subyett to any eeaem.to msroof.
\\ \ \\
Has
fasw the Public wow to be tM aid tu�Ry soai+ail� m don phis hereby dedicate to Ms puMle for puMle use
(NOT Ri SCARE) \ \ IN N Monty Redfy LLC o Minnesota/knitod lic fb oornpory hoe caused Urser preaenfa to be signed by!ts
BEING 5 FEET M MOTH,AND ADJLINMG LOT LINES UNLESS \ proper of8aer into_day o{ 20
OTHERWSE SHOW,AND 10 FEET M NOTH,AND ADJOYNMG
NON OF WAY LINE%UNLESS OU ERWSE 5M*N ON IHE PLAT ^ \ Signed:Minty Realty,LLC
/' 8y: Chief Manager
\ " / STATE OF O i TA
COUNTY\ 4 1/rh instrument was acknowledged bolas ms on by Manly Realty,LLC.
Byc Chief Manager Notary pwib6
My Co—Ise/n Enpkw
l Nadmk SYrfw do horsby osrt/ry that mla plat roe=Pod by me--dw my direct auperWsian that/am a del
I wood Land SYrroyor h ms Stofs of Mkmsaofo,• that!kb plot kr o aaraet onw,er tv de o/Uis boundary aurrof; U of di
ELM set rimh IS ,:7-7.t recdy dasiprofed an fine doh Drat a8 monwnenfs dgok fed on fink pMf hove bear. or will
\ a poi os of ms dots of Ur (b ors shod one UrH pat dogbod In dproirotys SatrosNLa CoeSection Nab�Oon
K.ADIMW 57101WYER Lard Saraycr
\ Minnesota License Not 25103
Cowry OF AVWYUW
\ i` L`i`r \\ \ This inaburrwrrt now acbroNedged before me Uric
\ I,-. . \ \\ \ \ day o/ y
\ / \ \\ :* - 20�b Nodlmk 57riw
Notary PWI/q
Z� \ \ 't!:\ {} \:; \ My Canm/ssion E**w
BROafLW CWIM kW09SOTA
LOT 1 1 \ Thin ppl/ot o/MONTY ADD/RLW roe epprorod occptsd by ms afy caxrak o/BrooMY Center Minnesota of a rsgu
S \ \ meefing thnso/hsid thh�o,_.�� day or z0�a applicaWa the written tormentsyand recopm-endotions of
Ow I \ \\ \ perrod has wid w nesipf oend d ee mm ntsimd yiecormm�dab�arr�proms by M.Vatuba,SecUm 5OaG,T ay
aTY COIHYQ OF BWOO M CENWIL M904ESOTA
ar Mayor
\ By: City Monger
\ \ \ \ TMAA/ER SERMES DEPARTMENT
\ \ Hennepin County,Mknseato
-i \\ ,- `• `• •, \\ \ \\ I hasby co;/&'of taxer payable�� and prior)eorr have been paid for lard described on this plat dated mrs
Y \\ \ Y
Henneph County Audtor
�\ �" \\ By: DWwty
BLOCK1 \ \ SURVEY lywsm
HHmn County,Minnesota
Pant to ARM.STAr.Sea JBMW5(1989), this plat has been approved this day of
\ _P z�
when P.s own.Hennepin County Sl )vr
c��RECORDER Kota
2 \
�- --- - - - - - -- - - f- - - - -- -�
�� e�1: l hereby aerU/y that me eRhh pros of MONTY A0011aV was,red h me office a fin.Canty ReeoWer for Peale rreord an this
86GJ2 �� �Mg A� day of 20 of—a'dock AL and eTR ardy MW h Book of P/afa
6.95 Pap. as Downeat Number
N89 51'45"E 189.77 NA44 WE \\ Math McCarmink Adhg He neph Cwnty Recorder
— ———I——— I PERMANEENTPER EASEMENT FOR HHIWW Y / \ Bye Deputy
------ ---i-- -- --- --- ------ --- ------ -- -- -- --- - \ \
— — — — — — — — — — POINT asrANr 98Sn Fr FROM THE sw COP Ci� NOM THE BASS OF BEARING rs BASED ON 1HE
SOUTH LME OF DIE SW 1/4,SEC 27, TNP. /19,RNG 21 . .,::fC" ... . S.ytT < SODTHER LY LNE OF LOT 2 BLOCK 1. CADY
,l i.T: ,iT/' i.R/S 9�Ci372S�,, THE SW 1/4 ALONG THE Sty LOW DOW ADDMCNr ASAMED TO BEAR NORTH SO DECREES
< ...,.,. . 1 51 1NNUlES 45 SECONDS EAST.
A 0 10 20 30
� •tTBroTES r/Y Np/spar MOMAENr FO/AeD
0 DENOTES 1/2 NON BY 14 NO/AWN MONEINENT
SET Ave MARKED BY JNNNE IX LICENSE Ma 25105 SCALE IN FEET
———————————— ———— —————— ———————————— ———— ———————— ———— —
E1gMeBrlry 0eeyk 6 wrre�jdnp