HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 10-11 PCM There was a motion by Commissioner Burfeind, seconded by Commissioner Parks, to approve
the Final Plat of Monty Addition, 6901 and 6915 Brooklyn Boulevard.
Voting in favor: Chair Pro Tem Kuykendall, Commissioners Burfeind, Parks and
Schonning
And the following voted against the same: None
The motion passed unanimously.
The Council will consider the final plat for Application No. 2012-018 at its October 22, 2012
meeting.
Carlos Morgan arrived at 7:08 p.m.
BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY UPDATE
Mr. Benetti explained that staff prepared a draft resolution regarding the recommendation and
findings of the Planning Commission to the City Council regarding the 2012 Brooklyn
Boulevard Corridor Study, which affirms the Planning Commission's support to the overall
Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor improvements. He added that the resolution included specific
attachments, goals and visioning statements for areas throughout the corridor.
Mr. Benetti explained staff is looking for input from the Commission regarding the prepared
draft resolution to provide a working document to move forward with.
Chair Pro Tem Kuykendall asked if Minneapolis has been involved with the Brooklyn Boulevard
Study. Mr. Eitel responded that Minneapolis was invited to participate as a part of the Technical
Advisory Commission but did not respond. He added Minneapolis is also doing a study of
Osseo Road from Penn Avenue coming up to Brooklyn Center but since it is a County Road, the
County will ultimately determine how the Brooklyn Boulevard/Osseo Road improvements will
occur from Brooklyn Center into Minneapolis.
Commissioner Morgan asked if staff knew why Minneapolis did not respond. Mr. Eitel
responded that Minneapolis was involved with the trailways study but it is possible they felt it
wasn't pressing to discuss at the time since they were doing their own study.
Mr. Benetti displayed the various proposed considerations along Brooklyn Boulevard including
reviewing transit stops, the option of a tunnel under Brooklyn Boulevard, extension of the
regional trail, open space to Brooklyn Boulevard from Northport Elementary School, pros and
cons of additional access to Brooklyn Boulevard at the Northport Drive intersection, median
treatment and theme lights, and landscaping. There was also discussion regarding options for
residential properties along Brooklyn Boulevard and possible senior residential development.
Commissioner Parks asked about the possibility of purchasing additional properties on the west
side of Brooklyn Boulevard and also asked if the school district would be in partnership
regarding the properties adjoining the school district's property. Mr. Eitel responded that it
would be difficult to do much on the east side of Brooklyn Boulevard since the land is virtually
landlocked, however, there is room to work with on the west side including the frontage road and
Page 2
10-11-12
single family homes. He added that they hope to establish a partnership with the school district
to coordinate appropriate use of properties surrounding the school.
Commissioner Parks asked if Minneapolis is coordinating with Brooklyn Center on this project.
Mr. Eitel responded that Brooklyn Center is coordinating with Minneapolis regarding the overall
visions but will rely on the County to have a greater influence.
Commissioner Morgan asked staff if there are other partners with the City on these projects. Mr.
Eitel responded Metro Transit, MnDot, Hennepin County, Three River Park District and also
individual businesses in the area were contacted and invited to be involved. He added two public
meetings were held that invited input from the residents also.
Commissioner Morgan replied that many organizations are counting on the information being
relayed to them to be aware of what is happening in the City.
Commissioner Parks if the south side of the fire station is blocked. Mr. Benetti responded that
there is a break in the median to accommodate the fire truck's access to and from the station.
Commissioner Parks asked if Malmborg's was represented at any of the meetings. Mr. Eitel
responded Mr. Malmborg's was at the meeting and informed of potential plans to create a
turnaround at the intersection near the entrance to their property and the church next door which
would affect both properties.
Mr. Eitel further described how a partnership might occur between the City, Malmborg's and the
church to create a desirable intersection and access to properties along Lilac Drive.
Commissioner Parks asked if the end result will meet approval of Malmborg's. Mr. Eitel
responded the desired outcome would be to appease all parties involved.
Mr. Benetti stated if the Commission's is in agreement with the draft resolution, staff will
prepare it for formal approval at the Commission's October 25, 2012 meeting.
It was the consensus of the Commission to move forward with the Resolution at the next
meeting.
DISCUSSION ITEM—UPDATE ON SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PROJECT—SITE PLAN
REVIEW FOR LA/FITNESS
Mr. Benetti stated that there will be a site plan review for the LA Fitness building (northwest
portion of the site) at the October 11, 2012 meeting. He added the final plat for 4001 Lakebreeze
Ave will also be reviewed at the meeting.
Commissioner Burfeind stated that he is a member of LA Fitness in New Brighton and he feels
that it is the best looking building of all LA Fitness buildings since it is constructed with lots of
natural stone and brick rather than the precast, concrete look. He added he is excited LA Fitness
is coming to Brooklyn Center and he hopes the building will look similar to the one in New
Brighton.
Page 3
10-11-12
There was further discussion by the Commission regarding some desirable sit down restaurants
that they would like to see in the Shingle Creek Crossing development.
There were no other discussion items.
OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Commissioner Burfeind, seconded by Commissioner Parks, t adjourn
the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meetin j ed at
8:13 p.m.
Chair
Recorded and transcribed by:
Rebecca Crass
Page 4
10-11-12