HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996 10-17 PCM MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
OCTOBER 17, 1996
CALL TO ORDER
The Planning Commission met in a regular session called to order by Chair Willson at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chair Tim Willson, Commissioners Donald Booth,Rex Newman,Dianne Reem, and Brian Walker
were present. Also present were Secretary to the Planning Commission/Planning and Zoning
Specialist Ronald Warren and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Arlene Bergfalk.
Commissioners Graydon Boeck and Mark Holmes was excused.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 26, 1996
There was a motion by Commissioner Newman, seconded by Commissioner Reem, to approve the
minutes of the September 26, 1996 meeting as submitted. The motion passed unanimously.
Commissioners Booth and Walker abstained as they did not attend that meeting.
CHAIR'S EXPLANATION
Chair Willson explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the
Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings,the
Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final
decisions in these matters.
APPLICATION NOS. 96015 AND 96018 (LANDFORM ENGINEERING COMPANY)
Chair Willson introduced Application No. 96015,a request from Landform Engineering Company,
Wayzata MN, for preliminary plat approval to subdivide into two lots the property located at the
northeast corner of 63rd Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard, and Application No. 96018, a
request from Landform Engineering Company for a Special Use Permit for accessory off-site
parking located on the same property. The Commissioners agreed to consider these related
Applications together.
The Secretary explained that Application No. 96015 was tabled by the Commission on September
26 pending the applicant's submission of a Special Use Permit request(Application No. 96018)to
approve an off-site accessory parking arrangement related to this Application. Using overhead
transparencies,Mr. Warren briefly reviewed the location and proposed preliminary plat to divide the
subject property into two lots to provide for construction of a Walgreen pharmacy on Lot 1 and a
10-17-96 1
Rainbow food store and two other freestanding retail buildings on Lot 2. (See details in Planning
Commission Information Sheets for Application No.96015 dated 9-26-96 and dated 10-17-96 which
are attached.)
Mr. Warren stated that with subsequent approval of Application No. 96018, the preliminary. plat
(Application No. 96015) is in compliance, subject to 5 conditions outlined in the staff report. In
addition,the final plat requires cross parking and cross access agreements between the two lots and
dedication of a 30'roadway easement for Beard Avenue North, and the existing building on the site
must be demolished prior to final plat approval.
Mr. Warren presented the staff report for Application No. 96018 (companion to Application No.
96015). (See details in Planning Commission Information Sheet for Application No. 96018 dated
10-17-96 attached.) He explained that the property,when subdivided into two lots,provides more
than the required number of parking spaces. However, Lot 1 is short 19 parking spaces of the
minimum required for the pharmacy building under the City ordinance. The applicant chose to apply
provide for off-site accessory parking on Lot 2 encumbered for the sole
for a Special Use Permit to rY p g
p
p
use of Lot 1.
Using a overhead transparency of a drawing submitted by the Applicant,the Secretary described the
arrangement for 24 parking spaces lying easterly of the lot line separating Lots 1 and 2 to be
encumbered for the use of Lot 1 where the Walgreen store will be built. This off-site accessory
parking will meet the City's parking requirements for this Lot and the proposal is consistent with the
City's standards and requirements for special use permits. The ordinance requires filing a legal
encumbrance acknowledging the dedication of the required parking from the accessory off-site lot
to the principal lot.
Chair Willson called for questions from the Commissioners.
Commissioner Walker inquired how the accessory parking will function,i.e.,how will it affect users
of the parking areas for the retail businesses. Mr. Warren explained that users will not be affected
because the encumbrance is primarily for the purpose of ownership to legally and permanently verify
that the properties are in full compliance with City ordinances. Therefore,the legal designation will
be transparent to customers using the parking facilities on the property.
PUBLIC HEARING (APPLICATION NOS 96015 AND 96018 LANDFORM ENGINEERING
COMPANY)
There was a motion by Commissioner Booth, seconded by Commissioner Reem, to reopen the
public hearing on Application No. 96015 and to open the public hearing for Application No. 96018
at 7:50 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Darren Lazan, representing Landform Engineering Company, Wayzata MN, stated he had no
further comments to add to the Secretary's report, and Ms. Jenna Sellers, project architect, and he
are available to answer questions. Mr. Lazan indicated the Applications comply with the City's
criteria and requested favorable action on both Applications.
10-17-96 2
Chair Wilson inquired if anyone else wished to be heard. There being none, be called for a motion
to close the public hearing. Motion by Commissioner Reem, seconded by Commissioner Booth,
to close the public hearing at 7:51 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
The Commissioners interposed no objections to the Applications as submitted, subject to the
conditions outlined in the staff report.
ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NOS. 96015 AND 96018
(LANDFORM ENGINEERING COMPAN) Q
There was a motion by Commissioner Booth, seconded by Commissioner Walker, to recommend
to the Council that it approve Application No. 96015, preliminary plat, submitted by Landform
Engineering Company, subject to the following conditions:
1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.
2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances.
3. The existing building on the site shall be demolished prior to final plat approval.
4. Preliminary plat approval is subject to the approval of Planning Commission Application
No. 96018 for off-site accessory parking. An appropriate document legally encumbering
a minimum of 20 off-site parking spaces on the proposed Lot 2 for the sole use of the
proposed Lot 1 shall be approved by the City Attorney and filed with the final plat for
this property.
5. Appropriate cross access and parking agreements, as determined by the City Attorney,
shall be executed prior to final plat approval and be filled with Hennepin County as part
of this plat.
and to recommend to the Council that it approve Application No. 96018, special use permit,
submitted by Landform Engineering Company, subject to the following conditions:
1. The special use permit is granted to allow a minimum of 20 parking spaces on the
proposed Lot 2,Block 1 Rainbow's Garden City Addition to be legally encumbered for
the sole use of the proposed Lot 1, Block 1 Rainbow's Garden City Addition.
2. A legal encumbrance, in a form approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the
final plat comprehended under Planning Commission Application No. 96015.
Voting in favor: Chair Willson, Commissioners Booth,Newman, Reem, and Walker. The motion
passed unanimously.
10-17-96 3
The Council will consider the recommendation at its October 28, 1996 meeting. The applicant must
be present. Major changes to the applications as reviewed by the Commissioners will require that
the applications be returned to the Commission for re-consideration.
APPLICATION NO. 96017 (BROOKDALE MITSUBISHI)
Chair Willson introduced Application No. 96017,a request for rezoning and site and building plan
approval through the Planned Unit Development(PUD)process, from Brookdale Mitsubishi, 7223,
7227, 7231, and 7235 Brooklyn Boulevard.
The Secretary presented the staff report using overhead transparencies to show the location and site
and building plans for the proposed 18,000 sq. ft. automobile dealership on a 7.035 acre site on the
west side of Brooklyn Boulevard, northerly of Shingle Creek. (See Planning Commission
Information Sheet For Application No. 96017 dated 10-17-96 attached.)
Mr. Warren described the four parcels of the property located in Brooklyn Center and a small
triangular shaped parcel of land located in Brooklyn Park. The applicant has acquired all of the
parcels described and plans to demolish the vacated restaurant building to construct a automobile
showroom,office,and service center. In additional an existing building currently occupied by CEAP
will be converted to store automotive parts and for vehicle detailing and cleanup. CEAP will lease
that building for up to one year until its relocation is accomplished.
Mr. Warren explained the existing zoning of the various parcels and of adjacent properties. He
stated that automobile sales and service are special uses in the C-2 zoning district, are not
comprehended under the C-1 zoning district,and automobile repair is not allowed to abut R-1, R-2,
or R-3 zoned property at a street or property line. Because of these current conditions,the applicant
proposes to pursue its request through the PUD process and seek rezoning based on a site and
development plan to a Planned Unit Development/Commerce zoning designation that would allow
the proposed use through a development agreement.
Mr. Warren described the PUD process,the rules and regulations of the Zoning Ordinance, and the
policy and review guidelines for rezoning. He presented the staff review of the guidelines as they
related to the applicant's proposal. A letter dated September 19, 1996, from Mr. Theodore Terp,
Brookdale Mitsubishi, describes the benefits of the development to the City anticipated by the
applicant. According to Mr. Terp,benefits include redevelopment of the abandoned restaurant site
and a vacant site, elimination of an access road,realignment of the access curb cut to be directly
opposite an existing access on Brooklyn Boulevard,ponding areas to improve water quality and run-
off from the site. In addition,the applicant believes the redevelopment to be consistent and logical
with respect to other current uses in the surrounding area.
The Secretary reviewed the staff analysis of the site and building plan, access and parking, grading,
drainage, utilities, landscaping and screening plan, building exterior materials and design, and
lighting and trash requirements. The staff recommends modifications to the building plan and
additional information is requested with respect to landscaping, site lighting, trash containment,
provisions for screening, and storm sewer installation. A storm drainage and water management
10-17-96 4
plan must be submitted to the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission for review and
comment.
Procedures for rezoning were detailed by the Secretary. He recommended following the
Commission's public hearing,that the rezoning proposal and site and building plan be referred to the
Northwest Neighborhood Advisory Group for review and comment. It was noted that State Statutes
allow only 60 days for City review and determination on zoning matters. While the applicant can
demand the matter be acted on by the Council within 60 days of the date of its filing, the time
limitation does not give the Commission adequate time to make its recommendation. Mr. Warren
stated the applicant has been requested to waive the 60 day time frame in lieu of the Commission's
review process. It is recommended that the Commission confirm the applicant's acknowledgment
of this waiver and assure that the application will be expedited.
Mr. Warren pointed out that the 4 parcels of land must also be platted into one single parcel and the
recommendations outlined in the staff report including a number of details not yet received from the
applicant must be incorporated into the proposal. The Secretary recommended that following the
Commission's consideration of the proposal and the public hearing, the application be tabled with
the consent and acknowledgment of the applicant, and the application be referred to the Northwest
Neighborhood Advisory Group for its review and comment.
Chair Willson called for comments from the Commissioners. Chair Willson noted that considerable
information is still required for this application and emphasized that the Commission be allowed
adequate time to consider this application. Mr. Warren explained the protection provided in City
ordinances and reviewed the time frame required to process this application. Commissioner Walker
inquired about the staff recommendation regarding installation of a screening fence on the property.
Mr. Warren recommended that an 8 foot high opaque fence or wall be installed along the parking
lot on this site to screen various adverse effects on the abutting residential property.
PUBLIC HEARING (APPLICATION NO. 96017 BROOKDALE MITSUBISHI)
There was a motion by Commissioner Booth, seconded by Commissioner Newman, to open the
public hearing on Application No. 96017, at 8:45 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr. John Baker, Baker Associates, Inc., Minneapolis, architect for the project, emphasized their
concern for the natural buffer zone between the commercial and residential and existing uses on
Brooklyn Boulevard, and indicated the design package and proposal are straight-forward.
Chair Willson inquired whether the applicant will waive the 60 day review and decision period. Mr.
Ted Terp,Brookdale Mitsubishi,Minneapolis,on behalf of the applicant,agreed to waive the 60 day
review and decision period allowed under State Statutes. The Commissioners acknowledged waiver
of the 60 day requirement by Brookdale Mitsubishi under Application No. 96017, and assured
expeditious handling of the application.
Commissioner Walker inquired what the hours of operation will be for the business. Mr. Terp stated
the service hours will be 7:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. Service hours will be expanded in the future based on
10-17-96 5
customer demand, however City criteria will be followed. The sales showroom for new and used
vehicles will be open 9 to 9 Monday-Thursday and 9-6 on Friday.
Chair Willson noted that landscaping,parking plans,lighting and trash enclosure are not defined and
that information must be provided to the Commission. Messrs.Baker and Terp indicated their intent
to comply with the requests for additional information on the Application.
The Commissioners inquired about various aspects of the proposal. Messrs. Baker and Terp
responded to their questions,described the components of the automobile dealership, and reiterated
that more information will be provided with respect to the Commissioners' concerns.
Mr. R. Duffy, 7215 Perry Court East, expressed concern about the effect of this proposal on the
property values of Creek Villa homeowners,the noise pollution created by public address paging
systems especially during the evening hours, extensive lighting and odorous fume pollution from
the property, increased traffic problems particularly with hazardous exit and entry to Creek Villa,
and unsightly operations of an automobile dealership. He noted the information presented is sketchy
with respect to concerns of the residents. Mr. Duffy explained that the Creek Villa neighborhood
owns and maintains its private streets and expressed concern regarding use of its streets for "test"
driving of vehicles. He stated the homeowners association has previously contacted the existing
Toyota dealership,with little success,to alleviate the current problems with test drivers (customers,
employees, and salesmen)using Creek Villa streets.
Ms. S. Bergfalk, 7209 Perry Court West, outlined opposition to the proposed rezoning and
development of Brookdale Mitsubishi. She pointed out that the plan is inconsistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and sacrifices residential quality of life for economic benefit. She expressed
concern regarding overall environmental impact of the proposal including the pollution of air,water,
soil, lighting, noise, and toxic materials created by an automobile dealership and noted that the
proposal does not address these concerns. Ms. Bergfalk recommended that the Planning
Commission carefully consider the mental health and physical well being of the Creek Villa
community, which is already enduring countless hazards from the existing car dealerships, be
protected through limited hours of operation, increased buffer zones, prevention of excessive
lighting, and elimination of the automobile repair aspect of the proposal.
Mr. P. Goldstein, 7212 Perry Court East, described the location and style of his home as it relates
to the proposed development which will be directly affected by the development of this proposal.
While foliage on the trees during the summer provide some relief from the pollution, an 8 ft. fence
would not be adequate for screening in his opinion. He reiterated and supported the concerns
previously expressed regarding noise and light pollution from the proposed development and invited
the Commissioners and the applicant to visit his home to view the sight lines.
Mr. R. Greenwood,4908 Wingard Place,reiterated and supported the concerns expressed regarding
noise pollution caused by loud speaker systems. He inquired about the need to rezone the small
portion of the property that lies on the Creek Villa/Shingle Creek(south) side of the property which
10-17-96 6
the developer does not intend to use. (Chair Willson responded that the City generally rejects "spot
zoning" to the benefit of any individual or business.)
Ms. J. Cole, 7220 Perry Court East, explained that the 3-level design of her home in Creek Villas
faces the adjacent property. While trees in full foliage during the summer months would deflect the
development, she pointed out that for 8 months of the year,the trees are bare and noise and lighting
from the existing Toyota dealership already create noise and lighting pollution. Ms. Cole requested
that the residents and quality of life of Creek Villa,who are primarily retired persons,and the Creek,
wildlife, and natural beauty of the area be protected and preserved through intense examination of
the proposal.
Mr. K. Wutschke, 7226 Perry Court East, described the proximity of his home to the proposed
development. He reiterated and supported the concerns expressed regarding noise/public address
system and light pollution. He described apprehension regarding the water run-off from the
blacktopped dealership given the porous soil conditions in the area and its effect on Shingle Creek.
(It was noted that the Watershed Management Commission must review the plans for this project.)
Mr. Wutschke questioned the value of an 8 foot fence in deterring noise and light pollution from the
development.
Mr. W. Sampson, 7208 Perry Court West,reiterated and supported the concerns expressed regarding
visual and auditory pollution. Noting that the deciduous trees in the area loose leaves early in the
year, Mr. Sampson suggested that large non-deciduous trees such as evergreens be planted in the
affected areas.
Ms. R. Andrescik, 7212 Perry Court East, expressed strong concern regarding the initial
establishment of operating hours of the dealership as stated by the applicant and indicated that
further discussion on this subject is imperative to the residents of the Creek Villa neighborhood.
The Commissioners, Mr. Warren, and the applicant's representatives, Messrs. Baker, and Terp
acknowledged the concerns expressed by the public. The applicants stated they are willing to work
with the neighborhood to address the problems cited and to reach mutual solutions. Mr. Terp
suggested that the small parcel of the property lying south of Shingle Creek could be donated to the
Creek Villa homeowners.
ACTION TO TABLE CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION NO. 96017 AND TO CONTINUE
PUBLIC HEARING(BROOKDALE MITSUBISHI)
At 9:30 p.m.,there was a motion by Commissioner Booth, seconded by Commissioner Walker,to
table action on Application No. 96017, to refer the Application to the Northwest Neighborhood
Advisory Group for review and comment, and to continue the public hearing.
Voting in favor: Chair Willson, Commissioners Booth,Newman, Reem, and Walker. The motion
passed unanimously.
10-17-96 7
A meeting of the Northwest Neighborhood Advisory Group will be scheduled as soon as possible
to expedite consideration and action on Application No. 96017. The applicant, the affected
residents, and Commissioners will be notified of the meeting date. Arlene Bergfalk agreed to act
as Recording Secretary for the neighborhood meeting.
Chair Willson recessed the meeting at 9:30 p.m. and reconvened at 9:40 p.m.
APPLICATION NO 96019 (T ANDFORM ENGINEERING COMPANY
Chair Willson introduced Application No. 96019, a request submitted by Landform Engineering
Company for preliminary plat approval to subdivide into 3 lots the 13.09 acre parcel of land located
on the north side of Freeway Boulevard,westerly of the Schmitt Music site.
Mr. Warren presented the staff report using overhead transparencies to show the site and location
of the property to be subdivided. (See Planning Commission Information Sheet for Application No.
96019 dated 10-17-96 attached.) The purpose of the subdivision is to create 3 legal lots based on
the 3 separate uses of the site. Adequate parking for each of the separate uses and proportionate
division of the wetland and flood plain area between the 3 properties is provided. Mr. Warren
distributed a revised Parking Summary provided by the Applicant reflecting the parking scheme
which meets zoning district standards and revised property lines. The subdivision will create Lot
1, 3.96 acres, site of the T.G.I. Friday's Restaurant;Lot 2, 5.30 acres, site of the 85 unit Country Inn
and Suites; and Lot 3, 3.82 acres, site of a 250 seat (yet undetermined) restaurant. These
developments were previously approved under Planning Commission Application No. 96012.
Appropriate cross access and parking agreements are required for inclusion in the final plat. Review
and approval of the site has been received from the Shingle Creek Watershed Management
Commission. The City Engineer may offer additional comments on the application.
Mr. Warren indicated the preliminary plat is in order and recommended approval subject to 3
conditions outlined in the staff report.
Chair Willson called for comments from the Commissioners. Chair Willson inquired whether the
sewer line on the property has been re-located. Mr. Warren explained that relocation to the street
line has been completed.
PUBLIC HEARING(APPLICATION NO 96019 LANDFORM ENGINEERING COMPAN) I
There was a motion by Commissioner Booth, seconded by Commissioner Reem,to open the public
hearing on Application No. 96019, at 9:50 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Darren Lazan, representing Landform Engineering Company, Wayzata MN, referred to the
revised parking summary submitted with revised lot lines to create the lots described by Mr. Warren
in his presentation,and indicated there were tight constraints on the property based on the real estate
agreements. Cross access and parking agreements will be prepared for the final plat documentation.
Mr.Lazan stated the subdivision is for legal separation of the properties based on their uses;however
10-17-96 8
all other previous site approvals remain the same. Favorable consideration and approval of the
preliminary plat subdivision was requested.
The design, construction and location of the cupolas on the buildings were reviewed. Mr. Lazan
stated that negotiations for occupancy of the second restaurant continue. Construction has begun
and it is anticipated that will continue through fall and winter with initial completion of T.G.I.
Fridays early in the spring.
There was a motion by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Newman,to close the
public hearing on Application No. 96019, at 9:55 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
The Commissioners interposed no objections to the Application as submitted subject to the
conditions outlined in the staff report.
_ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 96019 (LANDFORM
ENGINEERING COMPANY)
There was a motion by Commissioner Booth. seconded by Commissioner Walker,to recommend
to the Council that it approve Application No. 96018, submitted by Landform Engineering
Company, Wayzata, MN, subject to the following conditions:
1. The final plat is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.
2. The final plat is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the city ordinances.
3. Appropriate cross access and parking agreements, as determined by the City Attorney,
shall be executed prior to final plat approval and be filed with Hennepin County as part
of the final plat.
Voting for: Chair Willson,Commissioners Booth,Newman,Reem,and Walker. The motion passed
unanimously.
The Council will consider the recommendation at its October 28, 1996 meeting. The applicant must
be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Commissioner will require that the
application be returned to the Commission for re-consideration.
Commissioner Reem inquired about Landform Engineering Company's progress on the Rainbow
Food Store complex at 63rd and Brooklyn Boulevard. Mr. Lazan stated the asbestos abatement has
begun following approval of the procedure by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The
developer intends to complete demolition and begin construction yet this fall.
DISCUSSION - PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY DAKOTA HOSPITALITY
COMPANY
Mr. Warren reported that a preliminary site plan application has been filed today for a Planned Unit
Development at the northwest corner of Freeway Boulevard and Shingle Creek Parkway. This site
10-17-96 9
was originally approved for a Country Harvest restaurant,therefore the plan represents a revision
to the existing one which did not reach culmination. The developers requested that a preliminary
site plan be presented at this meeting. The formal application will be placed on the Commission's
November 14 meeting agenda.
Representatives of Dakota Hospitality Company, a North Dakota hospitality development and
management company, presented extensive information on its company, showed drawings and
models of its proposed Americinn Motel and Suites,proposed to be constructed on the site.
The Commissioners asked questions,made comments and suggestions,and participated in a general
discussion with the representatives. Details of the presentation are not included in these minutes
because this subject was presented only for preliminary discussion and the Commissioners took no
action. Details will be included in the minutes of the meeting at which the formal Application is
presented, considered, and acted upon by the Commission.
OTHER BUSINESS
The Commission's next meeting will be a joint meeting at 7:00 p.m. on October 30, 1996 with the
City Council members in Conference Room B, City Hall, to consider the plans and timetable to
update the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Warren reminded the Commissioners that the October
31 regular meeting is canceled.
ADJOURNMENT
There was a motion by Commissioner Booth, seconded by Commissioner Reem, to adjourn the
Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 10:25
p.m. -
Chair
Recorded and transcribed by:
Arlene Bergfalk
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial
10-17-96 10