Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997 08-14 PCM MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION AUGUST 14, 1997 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Tim Willson at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Tim Willson, Commissioners Graydon Boeck, Stephen Erdmann, Mark Holmes (arrived at 7:48 p.m.), and Dianne Reem were present. Commissioners Rex Newman and Brian Walker were excused from tonight's meeting. Also present were Secretary to the Planning Commission/Planning and Zoning Specialist Ronald Warren and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Carla Wirth. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JULY 17, 1997 There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Reem, to approve the minutes of the July 17, 1997 meeting, as submitted. The motion passed with Chair Willson abstaining from the vote. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Willson explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings,the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. APPLICATIONS NO 97010 97011 AND 97012 (HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES, INC.) Chair Willson introduced requests submitted by Holiday Stationstores,Inc. identified as Application No. 97010,for approval of a preliminary plat to subdivide two existing lots into three lots to allow redevelopment of a dental office and Holiday Stationstore at the northwest corner of T.H. 252 and 66th Avenue North; Application No. 97011,a request for a special use permit and site and building plan approval to construct a new 4,232 square foot Holiday Stationstore with an 1,080 square foot attached car wash located at the northwest corner of T.H. 252 and 66th Avenue North; and Application No. 97012, for approval of a site and building plan to demolish existing dental office and build an approximate 5,400 sq. ft. new dental clinic on the proposed Lot 2 that would be located west of the proposed Holiday Stationstore. Mr. Warren presented the staff reports using overhead transparencies. (See attached Planning Commission Application Information Sheet dated 8-14-97.) In response to Chair Willson, Mr. Warren stated it is correct that the City has no intention of extending 5th Street to the north through this property. 8-14-97 1 Commissioner Holmes arrived at 7:48 p.m. Mr. Warren indicated the preliminary plat is in order and reflects the proposed redevelopment outlined in subsequent Planning Commission applications. Appropriate cross access easements will need to be developed in a manner approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. He advised it is possible to recommend approval subject to four conditions as detailed in the staff report. With regard to the special use permit, Mr. Warren reviewed the standards required to be met in accordance with City Ordinance, Section 35-220. He noted the need to determine a finding with regard to Subsection(2d)"Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets." Mr. Warren noted the traffic conflict involving left-hand turning movements. He commented on Mr. Van Wormer's study and indication there may be a future need for a roadway median in this area. Mr. Warren stated he and the City Engineer recommend this issue be dealt with at this time rather than delaying until after the Holiday Stationstore is constructed. He explained the City could require the extension of the median past the access point which would result in prohibiting left-hand turning movements. Also, it may result in vehicles having to turn left and travel into the neighborhood in order to get turned around. Mr. Warren stated he would recommend this matter be tabled to allow time for discussion with representatives from Holiday Stationstores, Mr. Van Wormer, and City staff and determine whether the access points can be aligned across from each other or a median should be required. Mr. Warren advised the dentist office requested in Application No. 97012 is a permitted use in the C-2 zoning district,therefore,no public hearing is required with this application. However,notices were sent based on the Holiday Stationstore proposal and some persons residing in the Riverwood Townhomes may receive notices that have concerns or interest in the dentist office as well. He reiterated his recommendation to table consideration of Application No. 09012 following the public hearing and receiving input from the applicant. Chair Willson called for questions from the Commissioners. Commissioner Boeck addressed the traffic patterns at the intersection of Highway 252 and 66th Avenue N. and conflicting turning movements which currently exist. He stated his agreement that the right turn lane, as proposed, should be eliminated. Chair Willson stated his concurrence. Mr. Warren noted that one way to eliminate the left turning movement conflict is to extend the median. However, that results in causing several other issues such as traffic turning around in residential areas. Chair Willson noted the Planning Commission has strived to align access points across from each other. Mr. Warren pointed out the current location of the dental office property which is aligned with the access point to the south. 8-14-97 2 Commissioner Boeck stated his concern with Ordinance Section 35-220 2(b). He asked if the extension of the median would result in a right in/out for the station to the south(SuperAmerica)and stated the Courts have ruled that as long as you provide access,the use has access. Mr. Warren stated if the use is a commercial development, as the City has zoned, it is basically allowed. However, the City must consider the traffic issue on public streets. Commissioner Boeck asked if staff is confident these traffic issues can be worked out between all parties. Mr. Warren stated he believes it is worth pursuing. In response to Commissioner Holmes,Mr. Warren reviewed the requirements of the Sign Ordinance and prohibition of internally illuminated fascia on freestanding canopies. Commissioner Reem inquired regarding the exterior siding. Mr. Warren stated it will be stained a natural color. PUBLIC HEARING (APPLICATIONS NO 97010 97011 AND 97012. HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES. INC.) There was a motion by Commissioner Holmes, seconded by Commissioner Boeck, to open the public hearing on Applications No. 97010, 97011 and 97012 at 8:37 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Mark Nelson, Holiday Stationstores, Inc., stated Mr. Warren's presentation was very detailed and he has nothing to add but is available for questions. In response to Commissioner Boeck, Mr. Nelson reviewed their efforts to acquire the adjacent easement property since it would allow better circulation and setbacks. Chair Willson asked if adding the abutting parcel will result in the need for another review. Mr. Warren stated this depends on the extent of revisions. If the revisions are minor, they will be presented to the Planning Commission for their review and comment. If it only involves an area for landscaping and circulation, a formal plan revision may not be required. Commissioner Reem inquired regarding the location of the dental office and why Lot 3 is being left vacant. Mr.Nelson explained the dental office would like to retain visibility from Highway 252 and 66th Avenue N. Mr.Warren noted the gasoline service station and car wash cannot abut the R-3 property to the north. He noted a conceptual plan for Lot 3 has been submitted. Lynn Torkildson,Manager of Riverwood Townhomes, stated they have met with the applicant and would like to request some additional landscaping. She advised of resident's concern about a 24- hour operation and stated their appreciation that the dental office will actually abut the Townhomes rather than the Holiday station. Ms. Torkildson stated their willingness to work with the City and applicant to resolve these concerns. 8-14-97 3 i Ms. Torkildson commented on their recent exterior improvements and presented photographs of the property which identified how close the proposed dental office will be located to the Riverwood Townhomes. She explained their interior roadways are not as wide as City streets and one building unit will look directly into the dental office. Ms. Torkildson reviewed problems they are currently experiencing with vehicle traffic on the sand trail which goes between the dental and townhome properties which included vehicle damage and theft. She offered their assistance in watering newly planted landscaping in the buffer area. Chair Willson explained that, if approved, an underground irrigation system will be required. Commissioner Boeck stated Ms.Torkildson is"painting"quite a dismal picture about problems with theft, drugs,trespass,vehicle damage, and asked if a fence will really help. Ms. Torkildson stated it will and reviewed improvements which have already occurred after fences on abutting properties were erected. She stated they are currently increasing the height of their back fence to eliminate cut- through traffic. Ms. Torkildson then presented a list of reasons why the City should support their demands, a listing of six demands, and a"wish list"of nine items. She stated their minimum demands are as follows: 1. Install a fence along the eastern side of the landscape buffer area(10 to 15 feet from the property line)to discourage foot and vehicle traffic. 2. Plant additional pines on the western side of the buffer area. 3. Change five maple trees to a species that does not shed leaves, seeds, etc. Ms. Torkildson reviewed the location of their pool and problems currently experienced because of trees that drop leaves into their pool. She requested a copy of the Ordinance standards discussed previously and the names of the trees included in the landscape plan. Ms. Torkildson asked if the plans will be shifted towards the east if Holiday Stationstore, Inc. acquires the Mn/DOT easement property. Chair Willson stated this was addressed previously and the application will need to be resubmitted if the building location is shifted. Ms.Torkildson commented on the current traffic congestion and concern that an additional store will cause further congestion. She stated they originally supported the median but, after further review, found it will also cause problems for their residents in getting back to the Townhomes. She stated they decided they will abide by the City's determination if the access points can be aligned but would prefer to be able to get through this area during rush hours as opposed to being able to get back home after visiting one of the stores. Ms. Torkildson pointed out that if the median is installed, it will severely reduce the traffic into the SuperAmerica business. Ms.Torkildson asked how she should proceed with their requests. Chair Willson stated the Planning Commission cannot tell the applicant they are required to work with the Townhouse but do need to address each of the five criteria identified in the Ordinance. 8-14-97 4 Ms. Torkildson stated they are asking the Planning Commission to not approve the dental office without first meeting their demands. She asked if she should present a petition in support of their demands. Chair Willson explained the Planning Commission must assure that the application meets the requirements of the Code. Mr. Warren stated the Planning Commission should make a recommendation with regard to the appropriateness of the screening. Commissioner Holmes asked if this will be a 24 hour station. Mr. Warren stated it will. In response to Commissioner Holmes,Mr. Warren stated the driveway is on their property and there is no setback requirement for the driveway. Tom Kueppershaus, 6707 Fifth Street N., explained he commutes to downtown daily and addressed his traffic concerns. He reviewed the traffic conflicts which results in traffic stacking up. Mr. Kueppershaus stated he does not understand why another gas station is needed and suggested this be further studied, perhaps with traffic counters. Chair Willson stated traffic counters have been used and extensive traffic studies have been made of all traffic patterns throughout the City. He stated he also drives through this area and understands the traffic congestion concerns. Mr. Kueppershaus stated his property is impacted by the traffic and speaker noise from SuperAmerica. He agreed with the intention to address the traffic issue prior to construction. Evelyn Prokop, 6713 North Fifth Street,concurred with Mr. Kueppershaus' statements and need to close windows because of noise from the roadway and gas stations. She urged the Planning Commission to further study this proposal. Matthew Faber,6642 Camden Drive,Riverview Townhomes, stated he opposes this application and requested copies of the Ordinance standards. He stated the traffic is already congested and he is always fearful of getting"rear ended"when he turns into the Townhomes. Mr. Favor advised that his insurance rates increased when he moved into Brooklyn Center due to the high levels of traffic and crime. He stated the SuperAmerica is a very well known location and a prime spot for crime. Mr. Favor stated he can also hear the SuperAmerica speakers and radios from Police cars. He stated he believes the proposed Holiday Stationstore will result in a huge amount of additional traffic, especially because of the touchless car wash. Mr. Favor restated his concern about the high level of traffic and asked what has to be done to not approve this application. Chair Willson explained the Planning Commission and Council will look at the five standards that are required in the City Ordinance. Mr. Warren commented on the legal precedent already established behind the five standards. Ms. Prokop pointed out that a gas station was proposed for the other side of Highway 252 but it was defeated by that neighborhood. 8-14-97 5 Mr.Warren explained the gas station proposal on the other side of Highway 252 involved significant differences because the property needed to be rezoned. However on this side of the Highway,the land is zoned appropriately. Shama Wahlgren, lawyer representing SuperAmerica, stated they appreciate the recognition of the access issues. She expressed that SuperAmerica is concerned about a median,the impact it would have on their business,and potential exasperating effect it will have on traffic. She advised it is their position that limiting access and turning movements would have a devastating negative impact on their business. Ms. Wahlgren stated they welcome the opportunity to explore alternatives and discuss options which might be mutually beneficial to all interested properties. In response to Commissioner Boeck,Ms.Wahlgren stated she does not know much about the aspects relating to noise and crime since she is only involved in the real estate aspect. She stated this is a complicated situation involving the entire community and not something the company promotes. Ms. Wahlgren stated she is not prepared to respond to those issues. Mr. Nelson stated based on their discussion with the Townhome Association and what has been presented tonight,they agree to work with the Townhome Association on screening,plantings,fence, and other issues relating to lighting,etc. He stated they have worked on this project for quite some time but have not been able to meet with the traffic consultant yet. Mr. Nelson stated they have worked with City staff and will continue to do so. He requested approval subject to working out traffic issues with City staff and the traffic consultant. Commissioner Boeck asked if final plat action would still be needed if the preliminary plat is considered tonight. Mr. Warren stated this is correct. Commissioner Boeck noted the other approvals being requested including the special use permit and site plan approvals. Mr. Warren stated if there is no agreement in place regarding traffic, the only way he could recommend it proceed is to require the extension of the median down 66th Avenue to just east of Camden Court. Chair Willson stated he does not believe this application should be moved forward until the applicant has been allowed some time to work out these issues with City staff. Mr.Nelson stated this would be acceptable. Mr. Warren advised staff will resend notices to inform residents of the next meeting date. Ms. Torkildson requested the photographs be returned so she can present them to the Council. Chair Willson requested the Commissioners' input regarding how they would like to proceed. Commissioner Reem suggested the public hearing be closed, the applications be tabled, and the public hearing reopened when the application is presented again. 8-14-97 6 There being no further public comments, upon motion by Commissioner Reem, seconded by Commissioner Holmes,the public hearing on Applications No. 97010, 97011 and 97012 was closed at 8:38 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. ACTION RECOMMENDING TABLING OF APPLICATIONS NO. 97010. 97011, AND 97012 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES,. INC. There was a motion by Commissioner Reem, seconded by Commissioner Holmes to table consideration of Applications No. 97010, 97011, and 97012 as submitted by Holiday Stationstores, Inc. and to acknowledge that the applicant understands and agrees that the 60 day time limit imposed by State Statute is waived. Commissioner Boeck requested rationale to table be cited. Commissioner Reem stated she is moving to table to allow time for the applicant and City staff to meet and resolve concerns with traffic and access conflict. Commissioner Boeck suggested an amendment to require the parties to work together with SuperAmerica and Holiday Stationstore and City Staff in extending the existing divider from its existence westerly to a point east of Camden Court. Chair Willson clarified it is not within the Planning Commission's duties to recommend that individuals,who are not a part of the application process, meet. Rather,the Planning Commission must address the application and can encourage discussion and mediation, but cannot summarily move they get together to resolve the issues of concern as part of this application. Mr. Warren stated if discussion does not move ahead staff will bring the matter back at that time. He stated staff will discuss traffic access issues with all parties and attempt to reach a resolution. Commissioner Boeck asked if the Planning Commission also cannot request the additional landscaping, revised fence location, and different trees to prevent droppings into the pool. Mr. Warren stated these issues can be discussed during negotiations. Commissioner Boeck requested this be identified in the meeting minutes so the Council is aware of these concerns. Mr. Warren clarified that if tabled, the application will not be forwarded to the Council. He explained staff will present the outcome of the negotiations to the Planning Commission prior to the next meeting. Voting for: Chair Willson, Commissioners Erdmann, Holmes, and Reem. Abstaining: Commissioner Boeck. The motion passed. Chair Willson called for a recess at 9:45 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:55 p.m. APPLICATION NO. 97013 (TWIN LAKES PROPERTIES, LLP.) 8-14-97 7 Chair Willson introduced Application No. 97013, a request submitted by Twin Lakes Properties, LLP requesting approval of site and building plans to construct up to 130 garages at the Twin Lake Manor Apartments located at the southwest corner of 53rd Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard. Mr. Warren presented the staff report using overhead transparencies. (See attached Planning Commission Application Information Sheet dated 8-14-97.) Mr. Warren stated following discussion and consensus on the curb and gutter issue, approval of the application is recommended subject to five conditions outlined in the staff report. Chair Willson called for questions from the Commissioners. Commissioner Boeck asked when the units were built. Mr. Warren estimated in 1958 or 1959. Commissioner Boeck asked how often they have resurfaced the parking lot. Mr. Warren stated there have been numerous repairs and,perhaps, one resurfacing. Commissioner Erdmann asked if the applicants have provided information on what it would cost to include the recommended curb and gutter and extending the storm sewer onto the site. Mr. Warren suggested the applicant be asked to respond. Chair Willson noted the Planning Commission has,in the past,looked at issues of upgrading the site, held discussions on this particular curb issue,and taken the direction of requiring the curb and gutter to bring the property into compliance at that time. He noted there is not really any other time to take that action and this process is the "triggering" aspect that allows this consideration. In response to Commissioner Holmes, Mr. Warren reviewed past considerations and stated there have been some situations where there was no need to upgrade the parking lot so the curb and gutter were not required. However,this is a requirement and cost is not always an issue considered by the Planning Commission. In this case,the City Engineer feels there is a need for storm sewer and the installation of curb and gutter. Chair Willson noted that during road construction projects,the City is assessing costs for blacktop, curb and gutter improvements. Commissioner Boeck stated he believes they are only assessing a portion of the costs,not the entire cost. Mr. Warren stated the applicants have inquired about the possibility of allowing the curb and gutter to be staged at a later date. Commissioner Erdmann stated if staging the curb and gutter is approved,he would recommend the first stage include the parking areas closest to 53rd Avenue which are visible to the single-family residents. 8-14-97 8 Mr. Warren stated if staging is approved, staff would recommend a financial guarantee be held by the City to assure completion. Commissioner Holmes asked if land use availability is an issue. Mr. Warren stated it is not and will not impact drive lanes or traffic flow. George Van Fleet, applicant and majority owner of Twin Lake Manor, reviewed the improvements they have made and advised they have not taken any profit from these units for two and one-half years. He stated they have made many improvements and gotten rid of the problem tenants. He stated this property has great potential, is 100%occupied, and they are committed to upgrading the property. Eventually they would like to construct a club house with state-of-the art exercise equipment,etc. However,people from other neighborhoods are stealing cars,breaking into cars,etc. They have installed 30 additional spotlights to provide better security but to move forward with improving the property,they would like to have garages. Mr. Van Vleet explained that tenants are concerned about keeping their cars safe. He stated they also have economic realities since they have already put in one-half a million dollars into this project. He commented on the high level of landscaping that currently exists on this property and asked how many areas in the City have curb and gutter. Mr. Van Vleet pointed out some residents still have gravel driveways. He agreed to install the curb and gutter as soon as the other apartment owners do the same. Mr. Van Vleet stated another option is to change to low-income housing with government subsidy. However,he prefers to not go with that option. Mr. Van Vleet pointed out they put on nice siding, constructed new balconies,and made other quality improvements. He stated he is fi ustrated by what the City is requiring for this 30-year-old complex. Mr. Van Vleet stated he will guarantee he will not take any profit out of the project and will continue to make improvements. He welcomed the Planning Commission to view his properties in other communities and learn that they are happy with what he has done with them. He advised he is a long-term property owner. Commissioner Erdmann reviewed his background in accounting and financing and stated he is knowledgeable about economic realities and understands the magnitude of the undertaking in turning around properties that have deteriorated. He stated it is important to target investment dollars to where it is most urgently needed and taking care of the most critical areas first. Commissioner Erdmann stated the curb and gutter issue is way down on this list and, if financing is tight,he would rather see the money going into the buildings themselves at this point in time. He noted the building has existed for 30 years without curb and gutters and he thinks that could be delayed for several more years. He agreed this property has potential considering the surrounding amenities. He stated he does not want the curb and gutter improvement to derail the other planned improvements. Chair Willson asked when another time period would trigger requiring the installation of curb and gutter. Commissioner Erdmann agreed there is no foreseeable trigger unless it is the future addition to construct the club house. 8-14-97 9 Commissioner Holmes noted if it is a City-wide effort to require curb and gutter, it will eventually be extended to this property. He asked if private property is required to be upgraded. Mr. Warren stated the only time curb and gutter is addressed is with new construction or expansions of existing properties. Commissioner Holmes stated while he understands the importance of curbs and gutters,he concurs with Commissioner Erdmann about the cost of curb and gutter and need to upgrade the buildings. Chairman Willson pointed out there have been very few projects where the Planning Commission did not require curb and gutter or at least get a deferment. He noted the City Engineer's recommendation is for curb and gutter and to put the storm sewer in place. He pointed out this is the only opportunity to look at those issues. Commissioner Reem inquired whether there is a grandfather clause which can be considered. Chair Willson noted the ordinance requirement is to place curb and gutter. Mr. Warren stated this has become an issue because the parking lot is in dire need of repair and if there weren't those kinds of problems, staff would probably not recommend curb and gutter. He cautioned about the precedent that would be established if curb and gutter and storm drainage is not required at this time. Commissioner Boeck asked if the City inspects sites to determine what is delinquent, such as painting garages, and if the inspector has been on this site and recommends the parking lot be reconstructed. Mr. Warren stated they have. Boeck asked if the inspector can require curb and gutter. Mr. Warren stated he cannot and if the garages are not constructed now, the parking lot would still need to be resurfaced. Commissioner Boeck asked how they can be required to install curb and gutter. Chair Willson explained they are applying for site improvements so they are being asked to bring the property up to Code which requires curb and gutter. Commissioner Boeck stated the Planning Commission has already established a precedent since they did not require the Cross of Glory Church to install curb and gutter. ACTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICATION NO. 97013, TWIN LAKES PROPERTIES,LLP There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Erdmann,to recommend to the Council that it approve Application No. 97013, a request submitted Twin Lakes Properties, LLP requesting approval of site and building plans to construct up to 130 garages at the Twin Lake Manor Apartments located at the southwest corner of 53rd Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard, subject to the following condition: 1. Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 8-14-97 10 Commissioner Holmes stated this is the first time a motion has been made that eliminates staff s recommended conditions. Mr. Warren explained the affect it will have is to allow the construction of the garages and not require other improvements. Mr. Warren stated Commissioner Boeck is correct that the Cross of Glory Church was not automatically required to do a wholesale revamping of their parking lot, except for where new construction areas required it. He clarified this will not effect new construction areas and the only precedent will be with redevelopment. Commissioner Boeck stated he felt there was an extreme need for concrete curb and gutter to serve its main purposes of controlling drainage and traffic, but it is obvious this site has operated for 30 years without curb and gutter. He stated he sees no purpose for it. Chair Willson noted the Ordinance requirement for curb and gutter and stated his view is that this ordinance is on the books for a reason and should be enforced. Commissioner Boeck stated he believes the requirement deals with a parking or driving area where the configuration is being changed. Chair Willson stated the Ordinance does not say that. Commissioner Boeck called for the question on the motion. Commissioner Erdmann noted this property will be assessed for curb and gutter when it is installed. Commissioner Holmes agreed there is a reason for requiring curb and gutter. Mr. Warren stated the reason is to assist in drainage,to convey storm water,provide traffic control,improve aesthetics and long-term maintenance. He stated this is not a"life or death"issue and has been waived, at times, though probably not to this extent. Mr. Warren noted the City will probably not get another opportunity to require curb and gutter in the future. He stated that not having curb and gutter for 30 years does not mean that it would not have been a better project if it had curb and gutter or that the curb and gutter was not needed. Commissioner Erdmann stated they may find, in the future,that curb and gutter should be installed for practical reasons to extend the life of the parking area and protect that investment. Commissioner Holmes stated he will not support the motion on the floor and suggested the option of phasing be considered. He agreed curb and gutter is an investment in the parking lot. Chair Willson agreed the parking lot is in dire need of improvement and the only opportunity to require this improvement is during this process. Therefore,working with the Ordinance is the only route he supports. Mr. Van Vleet stated he understands curb and gutter does prolong the life of the blacktop but it will probably cost substantially more than the blacktop work. He asked if the State didn't just pass legislation to restrict tax increases when apartment building owners improve their properties. 8-14-97 11 Voting for: Commissioners Boeck, Erdmann and Reem. Voting against: Chair Willson and Commissioner Holmes. The motion passed. OTHER BUSINESS Chair Willson announced the grand opening of Rainbow Foods which will be held on August 22, 1997. Mr. Warren noted the letter complimenting the City for their work with the Park 'N Ride, the Country Store-Builders Square, and Brooklyn Boulevard. Mr. Warren stated he will try to get the Holiday Stationstore information ready for the meeting in two weeks, but that may not be possible. If not, it will the September 11 will be considered p , 1997 meeting. Mr. Warren announced the next Task Force meeting will be on Tuesday, August 19, 1997. Commissioner Reem inquired regarding the pile of blacktop material on 63rd Avenue. She also reported the Toys `R Us parking lot and property is in need of inspection. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Boeck, seconded by Commissioner Reem, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 11:00 p.m. ' Chair Recorded and transcribed by: Carla Wirth Timesaver Off Site Secretarial 8-14-97 12