HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991 11-07 PCM MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
STUDY SESSION
NOVEMBER 7, 1991
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
The Planning Commission met in study session and was called to
order by Chairperson Molly Malecki at 7:32 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chairperson Molly Malecki, Commissioners Ella Sander, Wallace
Bernards, Bertil Johnson, Kristen Mann and Mark Holmes. Also
present were Director of Planning and Inspection Ronald Warren and
Planner Gary Shallcross. Chairperson Malecki noted that
Commissioner Ainas had called to say he would be unable to attend
and was excused.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - October 10, 1991
Motion by Commissioner Bernards seconded by Commissioner Holmes to
approve the minutes of the October 10, 1991 Planning Commission
meeting as submitted. Voting in favor: Chairperson Malecki,
Commissioners Bernards and Holmes. Voting against: none. Not
voting: Commissioners Sander, Johnson and Mann. The motion
passed. \
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - OCTOBER 17, 1991
Motion by Commissioner Mann seconded by Commissioner Sander to
approve the minutes of the October 17, 1991 joint Planning
Commission and City Council meeting as submitted. Voting in favor:
Chairperson Malecki, Commissioners Sander, Mann and Holmes. Voting
against: none. Not voting: Commissioners Bernards and Johnson.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
Following the Chairperson's explanation, the Secretary introduced
two ordinance amendments for the Planning Commission to consider.
The first ordinance amendment was a flood plain ordinance amendment
which made two technical changes, one to the date of the official
map and another a change to a statute cited.
ACTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE FLOOD PLAIN
ORDINANCE
Motion by Commissioner Mann seconded by Commissioner Sander to
recommend adoption of an amendment to the flood plain ordinance
relating to the map date and a statute citation. Voting in favor:
Chairperson Malecki, Commissioners Sander, Bernards, Johnson, Mann
and Holmes. Voting against: none. The motion passed.
I
I
11-7-91 1
HOURS OF OPERATION AT COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS NEAR RESIDENTIAL
AREAS
The second ordinance amendment that the Secretary introduced was an
ordinance amendment relating to 24 hour operations being separated
from R1, R2, and R3 zoned property. He explained that commercial
uses would not be prohibited from locating near R1, R2 and R3
property if they did not operate between 11: 00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
He went on to explain that the ordinance amendment would affect
some existing operations that are 24 hour operations near
residential property. He stated that if these uses were to lapse
in their present use, a similar use could not resume the operation
if discontinued for a period of two years. He stated that this
would be a nonconforming aspect to these operations. The Secretary
reviewed various locations of businesses that might be affected by
the limitation of hours adjacent to R1, R2 and R3 zoned property.
G Commissioner Bernards pointed out that the health club was open
past 11:00 p.m. The Secretary acknowledged this and that there may
be other conflicts with the proposed ordinance. He suggested that
' the Commission may want to change the limitation of hours to
between midnight and 6:00 a.m. In response to a question from
Commissioner Holmes, the Secretary stated that if the ordinance
were adopted, these existing operations would be allowed to
continue as a nonconforming use. Commissioner Bernards observed
that this ordinance would affect PDQ Food Stores which wished to
locate near a residential area. The Secretary explained that it
would not allow them to be a 24 hour operation, but that they could
operate between 6: 00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. Commissioner Bernards
noted that this limitation would affect the interest of other
buyers in that property. The Secretary acknowledged this. He went
on to say that staff would recommend that the ordinance allow
hospitals and other emergency medical services to locate in such an
area and not to be subject to the limitation on hours.
Commissioner Bernards asked whether the businesses that would be
affected by this ordinance would be notified of the ordinance
amendment. The Secretary stated that that could be done.
Commissioner Bernards asked whether the limitation could be changed
from 11:00 p.m. to midnight. The Secretary responded that was a
possibility if the Commission so desired. Commissioner Sander
stated that she would prefer to start out with tighter hours of
operation and loosen later if there is a problem. The Secretary
acknowledged that the City could be challenged on this ordinance.
Commissioner Holmes asked whether the City could supersede state
law with this kind of ordinance. The Secretary responded in the
affirmative. He stated that zoning ordinances always affect where
businesses can locate.
11-7-91 2
ACTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT RELATING TO
THE HOURS OF COMMERCIAL OPERATION ADJACENT TO R1, R2 AND R3 ZONED
PROPERTY
Motion by Commissioner Sander seconded by Commissioner Johnson to
recommend adoption of an amendment to the zoning ordinance relating
to the hours of commercial operations within 200 ft. of R1, R2 and
R3 zoned property. Voting in favor: Chairperson Malecki,
Commissioners Sander, Johnson, Mann and Holmes. Voting against:
Commissioner Bernards. The motion passed.
Commissioner Bernards stated that his opposition was because he
felt the hours were overly restrictive and not consistent with some
standard closing times.
SIGN ISSUES
The Secretary then referred the Commission's attention to a memo
regarding real estate signs and also some materials from the City
Manager on a requested sign by Marquette Bank. The Secretary
reviewed the Marquette Bank sign. He noted that the bank proposes
to have a freestanding sign and offered to take down all wall
signery in exchange for having the extra freestanding sign. The
Secretary pointed out that the ordinance presently allows up to 30%
of the wall area to be used in signery which is a very generous
limit. He pointed out that no one has 30% of their wall area in
signery.
The Secretary recommended to the Commission that it consider
scaling back the allowable area that can be used for wall signery
and that it perhaps look at some sort of tradeoff as has been
proposed between wall signs and an extra freestanding sign. The
Secretary also suggested that there may be merit in establishing a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) sort of provision in the sign
ordinance to allow a sign package to be considered by the Planning
Commission and City Council. He stated that such a package could
consider tradeoffs between different types of signs, but that
standards need to be in place to start with.
Commissioner Johnson stated that he felt inadequate to judge what
a sign ought to look like and asked that any ordinance amendment
developed systematically an idea of what signs should look like.
The Secretary stated that it was a matter of aesthetics, that signs
with the same size and message could look good or bad, depending
on the colors, lighting, etc. Commissioner Sander pointed out that
different types of businesses want different types of signs. She
asked what percent of wall area would be adequate for commercial
buildings. The Planner answered that between 15% and 20% would
probably be more than adequate. The Secretary stated that the
tradeoffs that could be pursued under a sign package might also
include provision for real estate signs. Commissioner Johnson
asked whether the ordinance differentiates between permanent signs
and real estate signs. The Secretary stated that permanent signs
require a permit.
11-7-91 3
Commissioner Bernards stated that he did not want to open up the
City to the charge of being arbitrary and capricious. The
Secretary stated that if a sign package were not approved, an
applicant would always have the alternative of simply living within
the ordinance.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Bernards seconded by Commissioner Mann to
adjourn the meeting of the Planning Commission. The motion passed
unanimously. The Planning Commission adjourned at 8:36 p.m.
Chairperson
11-7-91 4