HomeMy WebLinkAbout90-2 PCR Member Lowell Ainas introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-2
RESOLUTION REGARDING RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF
APPLICATION NO. 90022 SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF BROOKLYN
CENTER
WHEREAS, Application No. 90022 submitted by the City of
Brooklyn Center proposes rezoning from I-1 (Industrial Park) to C1A
(Service/Office six parcels of land lying between Summit Drive and
Interstate 94 and between Shingle Creek Parkway and Highway 100;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called
public hearing on August 16, 1990 when testimony regarding the
request was taken; and
WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning has been reviewed by the
Planning Commission in light of the recommendations of the
Comprehensive Plan the Guidelines for Evaluating Rezonings
contained in Section 35-208 of the Zoning Ordinance, and of the
existing pattern of development in the area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Brooklyn Center
Planning Advisory Commission to recommend to the City Council that
Application No. 90022, submitted by the City of Brooklyn Center, be
approved in consideration of the following:
1. The C1A zoning is consistent with the existing land
development in the area in question. The present
I-1 zoning allows for industrial uses which would
be inconsistent with other land uses in this area.
2 . All permitted uses in the C1A zoning district can
be contemplated for development of the subject
properties.
3 . Since the original I-1 zoning of this land, the
Shingle Creek Parkway interchange with the freeway
has been constructed which has improved access to
the area and made high density development more
desirable.
4. The City's interest in quality aesthetics and
increased tax base and keeping the character of the
area high-rise office will be served by the
proposed rezoning.
5. The subject properties will bear fully the
ordinance development restrictions for the C1A
district.
1
1
RESOLUTION NO. 90-2
6. The location of the six parcels contained in the
rezoning application is no longer suited to
industrial uses.
7. The rezoning will result in the expansion of a
zoning district which is warranted by a) the City's
Comprehensive Plan; b) the lack of developable
land in the C1A district; and c) the best
interests of the community.
8. The best long-term use of the parcels in question
is high-rise office.
9. In light of the above, it is felt that the proposed
rezoning is consistent with the Guidelines for
Evaluating Rezonings contained in Section 35-208 of
the Zoning Ordinance and is, therefore, in the best
interests of the community.
August 16, 1990
Date Chairperson
ATT / c, -�
Secretary
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member Ella Sander and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof: Molly Malecki, Wallace
Bernards, Lowell Ainas, Kristen Mann, Ella Sander and Mark Holmes
and the following voted against the same: none, whereupon said
resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
1
1