Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-5 PCR Member Ella Sander introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-5 RESOLUTION REGARDING RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 91018 SUBMITTED BY PDQ FOOD STORES, INC. WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 91018 was submitted by PDQ Food Stores, Inc. , seeking site and building plan and special use permit approval to build a gas station/convenience store/car wash at the southeast quadrant of Highway 252 and 66th Avenue North; and WHEREAS, Section 35-220, Subdivision 2 of the Zoning Ordinance states that a special use permit may be granted by the City Council after demonstration by evidence that all of the five standards for Special Use Permits listed in said section of the Ordinance are met; and WHEREAS, the application was considered by the Commission at its September 12, 1991 regular meeting during which a public hearing was held and testimony regarding the request was received; and WHEREAS, the majority of the Planning Commission believes it is necessary to revise the plans submitted by PDQ Foods, Inc. in the following manner as a means of meeting the five standards for Special Use Permits: 1. Provide an access off the frontage road no closer to 66th Avenue North than the existing access serving the Atkins Mechanical site. 2 . Provide a site design that clearly leads patrons to exit the site via a shared access leading to the { existing median opening on 66th Avenue North. 3 . Consideration of site design that might lead to the elimination of some gasoline dispensing pumps which would lead to better circulation on the site. 4. Consideration of only one access point from the frontage road serving this site. 5. Modification to the plans for the canopy to provide recessed lights to avoid light glare to the neighboring property. 6. Elimination of the neon band on the canopy. I i r f I v i I RESOLUTION NO. 91-5 7. Modification to the plan to include a minimum 6' high masonry wall to provide appropriate screening of the site to the residential property to the east; and WHEREAS, the applicant, during the public hearing, indicated it was not willing to revise the site and building plans in accordance with the above recommendations; and WHEREAS, testimony taken from neighboring property owners raises concerns that the PDQ plan will not promote and enhance the general welfare and may be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort by citing recent problems experienced at a nearby convenience store/gasoline station; and WHEREAS, testimony taken from neighboring property owners also raises concerns that the PDQ plan will be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate area and may well lead to diminishing property values in the neighborhood and be an impediment to the upgrading of residential property in the immediate area; and WHEREAS, the Commission has considered the proposal in light of the staff report, testimony received, and the standards for a special use permit contained in Section 35-220.2 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Brooklyn Center { Planning Advisory Commission to recommend that Planning Commission ; Application No. 91018 be denied on the grounds that the applicant has not demonstrated by evidence that the standards for a special use permit contained in Section 35-220.2 have been met. Specifically, the Commission finds that the standards are not or will not be met on the basis of the following: 1. The arrangement of the access drives on the proposed site plan does not lead motorists to exit the site via the joint driveway to the median opening in 66th Avenue North. The result of this arrangement will be for many cars exiting the site onto the frontage road and creating traffic congestion at the intersection of the frontage road 1 and 66th Avenue North immediately east of Highway 252. This is deemed to pose an unacceptable risk of congestion affecting Highway 252. An appropriate access design for this site would have only one access onto the frontage road no closer to 66th Avenue North than the existing access to Atkins Mechanical. K i 'r i I RESOLUTION NO. 91-5 2. The establishment, maintenance and operation of a gas station/convenience store/car wash will not promote and enhance the general public welfare since there is already a gas station/convenience store at the same intersection across Highway 252. 3 . The presence of another 24 hour gas station/convenience store in the neighborhood may attract more crime in the area similar to what has been experienced recently at Superamerica across Highway 252. 4 . The lighting of the canopy and the noise and fumes from the service station will be injurious to the ; use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted. It is also believed that property 1 values in this area may suffer if the service station is built as proposed. 5. The establishment of the proposed gas station/convenience store/car wash will be a disincentive for property owners in the area to maintain and upgrade their properties because of its negative impact. Based on the foregoing, it is determined that the standards for a special use permit continued in Section 35-220.2 of the Zoning Ordinance are not met. Date Chdirperson ATTE / 4 Li Secretary The motion for the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Lowell Ainas , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chairperson Malecki, Commissioners Sander, Bernards, Ainas, Mann, and Holmes and the following voted against the same: none whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 1