Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 10-25 PCM MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION OCTOBER 25, 2012 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Rahn at 7:14 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Sean Rahn, Commissioners Scott Burfeind, Stan Leino, Carlos Morgan and Stephen Schonning were present. Also present were Councilmembers Carol Kleven, Secretary to the Planning Commission Tim Benetti, Director of Business & Development, Gary Eitel, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Kara Kuykendall and Michael Parks were absent and excused. Stan Leino arrived at 7:14 p.m. (Mr. Leino's presence created a quorum of the Commission and allowed the meeting to begin 14-minutes after the 7:00 p.m.posted meeting time). APPROVAL OF MINUTES—OCTOBER 11, 2012 There was a motion by Commissioner Burfeind, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to approve the minutes of the October 11, 2012 meeting as submitted. The motion passed. Chair Rahn abstained as he was not at the meeting. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Rahn explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. APPLICATION NO. 2012-021 LOREN VAN DER SLIK/GATLIN DEVELOPMENT Chair Rahn introduced Application No. 2012-021, consideration of a proposed Site and Building plan approval for a new LA/Fitness facility, proposed Building J, as illustrated and planned in the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Master Development Plan (1500 Shingle Creek Crossing). (See Planning Commission Information Sheet dated 10-25-12 for Application No. 2012-021.) Mr. Benetti explained Building J was originally planned to be 45,000 sf. building on a 3.5 acre pad site platted as Lot 7, Block 1, Shingle Creek Crossing. He added as part of the recent amendments No. 2 and 3, Building G site was re-labeled to Building J which will be a slightly smaller building (38,000 sq. ft.) with a slightly smaller lot size of 3.09 acres. Mr. Benetti further explained the new LA Fitness building footprint is approximately 160' x 216', or 34,500 sq. ft. and the interior mezzanine level of 3,500 sq. ft. increases this building size Page 1 10-25-12 to the 38,000 sq. ft. He added the PUD Agreement between Gatlin Development and the City allows the Developer to decrease final building sizes without the need for any PUD amendment or special approvals. Mr. Benetti stated the new site plan layout contains two minor changes including removal of a two-way drive aisle to the rear of the building to accommodate front row parking and a smaller connecting parking area to the east side of the building which is to be kept as green space and landscaped area. Mr. Benetti continued by stating the building is surrounded by 6-ft. sidewalks along the west, north and east sides, and a larger 15-ft. walkway along the front as well as connecting walkways between the two building sites to the west and east of this site. He pointed out the Planning Commission adopted a resolution that included an additional condition regarding improving pedestrian access on the site, however, this plan does not include any walkway connection to the trail/walkway along Bass Lake Road due to the existing decorative fencing along this existing trail. He added the City Council did not support the idea of allowing additional or multiple pedestrian access "cuts" in the Bass Lake Road fencing and felt the walkway connections offered by the Developer/Development was adequate and much safer. Therefore, there is no recommendation made to include any additional walkway to the Bass Lake Road segment. Mr. Benetti reviewed the exterior components of the building including the stone veneer and lighting on the buildings as well as the exterior sidewalks. He added they are suggesting that lighting be included on all four sides of the building since the walkway continues around the entire site. Mr. Benetti added that staff has also recommended that the developer install another drive aisle on the other side of the parking area. He pointed out the Phase II Land Disturbance permit has been approved on the site which accommodates Buildings H, K and L and part of the parking area and utility work is being handled under the building permit process. Therefore, staff is recommending the adoption of Resolution No. 2012-23. Chair Rahn asked if the landscaping is adequate as it relates to the city's landscape point system. Mr. Benetti responded that the overall landscaping plan was approved as part of the original PUD approval and went above and beyond what is required. He added even adjusting what is being accommodated in the back, they are still within what's required. Commissioner Leino asked if the building meets similar size and style requirements as other LA Fitness buildings. Mr. Benetti responded that typically a company will come in with prototype plan depending on what part of the county they are located in. He added this prototype contains more features that other LA Fitness facilities in the metro area and fits the city's architectural standards. Commissioner Morgan arrived at 7:25 p.m. Commissioner Burfeind asked if the stone veneer is similar to what was used on the Wal-Mart building. Mr. Benetti explained that it will look similar to and will blend in but will not mimic exactly. He added the city requested additional materials on the building to meet standards established with the Wal-Mart building. Mr. Burfeind stated he likes the proposed look of the building. Page 2 10-25-12 The Chair called for further discussion or questions from the Commissioners. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2012-021 SUBMITTED BY LOREN VAN DER SLIK OF GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY REQUESTING SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL OF BUILDING J IN THE SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS SCHEDULED TO BECOME THE NEW LA FITNESS FACILITY LOCATED AT 1500 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING There was a motion by Commissioner Leino, seconded by Commissioner Schonning to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-23. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Leino, Morgan, and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its November 13, 2012 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-24 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED FINAL PLAT OF FRANCE AVENUE BUSINESS PARK ADDITION LOCATED AT 4001 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE NORTH (PAUL HYDE—REAL ESTATE RECYCLING) APPLICATION NO. 2012-009 Mr. Benetti explained the preliminary plat was approved by the City Council with certain conditions on July 23, 2012. The final plat has been reviewed by staff and found to be in conformance with the approved preliminary plat and is recommended for approval. There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner Leino, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-24. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Leino, Morgan, and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its November 13, 2012 meeting. CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-25, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED FINAL PLAT OF SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 2ND ADDITION LOCATED IN THE SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO. 2012-011 Page 3 10-25-12 Mr. Benetti explained the preliminary plat was approved by the City Council with certain conditions on September 24, 2012. The final plat has been reviewed by staff and found to be in conformance with the approved preliminary plat and is recommended for approval. Chair Rahn asked about the easements located through Shingle Creek. Mr. Eitel responded that there is stagnant water throughout the creek and as the result of an obstruction in Minneapolis and the City will fix it so it flows again by gravity. There was a motion by Commissioner Burfeind, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2012-25. Voting in favor: Chair Rahn, Commissioners Burfeind, Leino, Morgan, and Schonning And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its November 13, 2012 meeting. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY'S PLANNING ADVISORY COMMISSION REGARDING THE 2012 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR PRELIMINARY LAYOUT Mr. Eitel explained that staff felt it important to add additional details to the resolution as various exhibits to outline in detail proposed changes to the corridor. He further described plans to create a more visible sign to better announce the entrance to the city at the entry of the city at 49th Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard as well as the preservation of the trees in the area. He also discussed the elimination of back up traffic unto Brooklyn Boulevard (a County Road) to create a safer environment for traffic and pedestrians. Mr. Eitel further explained proposals to create better access at intersections off Hwy 100 unto Brooklyn Boulevard by slowing down traffic. Commissioner Morgan asked about a recent comment made about a tunnel being located under Hwy 100. Mr. Eitel responded that he has engaged in conversations with the consultant regarding a tunnel under or possibly a pedestrian bridge over the Hwy 100 intersection. Commissioner Leino stated he would be more in favor of a bridge than a tunnel for safety reasons. Mr. Eitel responded there are tunnels on the regional trail-way and if it appears to be a safety issue, they will not pursue it. Commissioner Burfeind stated that the transit hub along this interchange does provide a pedestrian cross walk; however, it is not ADA compliant and appears to be dangerous for pedestrians. He asked if it is an option to do some landscaping similar to what occurred along County Road 10. Mr. Eitel responded it if is done properly, it could be done. Commissioner Burfeind suggested staff put a push on MnDOT to consider safer pedestrian routes along this intersection. Mr. Burfeind further stated he sees several options that would not be as expensive as what is proposed. Page 4 10-25-12 Mr. Eitel continued to review the areas of 56th and Brooklyn Boulevard, Bass Lake Road and Brooklyn Boulevard, and other intersections along the boulevard. Mr. Eitel suggested that the approval of the resolution could be delayed until the November 8, 2012 meeting if the Commission wished to review the changes to the resolution further. Chair Rahn stated he is in agreement that the Commission delay adopting the resolution until the entire Commission has an opportunity to provide input regarding the proposed additions to the resolution. It was the consensus of the Commission to delay approval of Resolution Regarding the Findings and Recommendations of the City's Planning Advisory Commission Regarding the 2012 Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Preliminary Layout until a future meeting. DISCUSSION ITEM There were no discussion items. OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Burfeind, seconded by Commissioner Leino, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. —2 x Z,—/ Chair Recorded and transcribed by: Rebecca Crass Page 5 10-25-12